alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1733 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update 

a report on the energy and environmental benefits of 

the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1733 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL. 

2 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with 

4 the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agen5 cy and the Director of the Office of Management and 

6 Budget, shall— 

7 (1) review and update the report prepared pur8 suant to section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 

9 2005; 

10 (2) after consultation with relevant Federal, 

11 State, and local agencies and affected industry and 

12 stakeholder groups, update data that was used in 

13 preparing that report; and 

14 (3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordi15 nated Federal strategy to increase the beneficial 

16 reuse of used lubricating oil, that— 

17 (A) is consistent with national policy as es18 tablished pursuant to section 2 of the Used Oil 

19 Recycling Act of 1980 (Public Law 96–463); 

20 and 

21 (B) addresses measures needed to— 

22 (i) increase the responsible collection 

23 of used oil; 

24 (ii) disseminate public information 

25 concerning sustainable reuse options for 

26 used oil; and 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1733 RFS 

1 (iii) promote sustainable reuse of used 

2 oil by Federal agencies, recipients of Fed3 eral grant funds, entities contracting with 

4 the Federal Government, and the general 

5 public. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-116629 and 333-109893 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2010 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatoryparagraphs relating to the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as discussed in Note 1 and the change in the manner in which the Company accounts for certain warrants as discussed in Note 8), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Caturano and Company, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 12, 2010
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3 Analysis of BETHSY Test 6.9c: Loss of RHRS: SG Manway Open (NUREG/IA-0187)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0187 (PDF 2.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** August 2000

**Prepared by:** G. R. Kimber, M. A. George

AEA Technology A32 Winfrith Dorchester, Dorset DT28DH UNITED KINGDOM

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Accidents associated with a loss of the Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS) during PWR shutdown operation have received attention in recent years. Typically such events occur at low pressure and low core power.

A series of tests, 6-9a-d, has been performed in the BETHSY Integral Test Facility at Grenoble, France, to address the safety issues posed in this type of incident. The data from Tests 6.9a,c & d are available to the AEA Technology through its membership of the BETHSY Club.

Tests 6.9a & d have been analyzed in previous years. Test 6.9c, the subject of this report differs from previous tests as it simulates plant conditions following a loss of RHRS when the primary circuit is open in two places; one at the pressuriser manway and the other at the steam generator outlet plenum. There is thus the potential for a large inventory loss from the primary circuit and a deep core uncovery. This did in fact occur. The analysis of this test is directly relevant to PWR thermal hydraulics safety issues associated with loss of RHRS.

The analysis has been performed using the latest release version of RELAP5, i.e. MOD3.2. The main phenomena occurring during this rest are well represented by the calculation. The calculated primary circuit peak pressure matches the experimental value. The reduction in pressure following the peak is, however, delayed due to water draining from the steam generator and being entrained into the pressuriser.

The cladding temperature rise is delayed and the start of the gravity feed is about 150s late. Ultimately, however, the experimental peak clad temperature is matched to within 15°C. The mass error associated with the calculation is less than 10% for most of the transient.

It is concluded that the broad characteristics of the transient would be experienced in a similar scenario for PWR plant. The analysis will also form the UK submission for the International Standard Problem 38 being hosted by AEA Technology at Winfrith.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 91-6353.

#### King *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 11

PACIFICA BANCORP, INC.

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

|                                                            |                                                                              | Years Ended December 31, |          
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------
|
|Net income (loss)                                           |                                                                              | $                        | 878,018  
|Computation of average shares outstanding                   |                                                                              |                          |          
|                                                            | Shares outstanding at beginning of the year                                  |                          |          
|                                                            | Additional shares deemed outstanding because of stock dividends              |                          |          
|                                                            | Additional shares deemed outstanding because of stock splits                 |                          |          
|                                                            | Shares redeemed under stock repurchase program                               |                          |          
|                                                            | Shares issued during the year times average time outstanding during the year |                          |          
|                                                            |                                                                              |                          |          
|Average basic shares outstanding                            |                                                                              |                          | 1,616,632
|Average number of dilutive shares assumed to be outstanding |                                                                              |                          | 187,302  
|                                                            |                                                                              |                          |          
|Average diluted shares outstanding                          |                                                                              |                          | 1,803,934
|                                                            |                                                                              |                          |          
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                             |                                                                              | $                        | 0.54     
|Diluted earnings (loss) per share                           |                                                                              | $                        | 0.49     

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1892 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1892

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Hometown Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF IN THE EVENT OF 
              THE DEATH OF A FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 
              DUTY.

    (a) Amendment.--The sixth sentence of section 7(m) of title 4, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``possession of the United 
        States'' and inserting a comma;
            (2) by inserting ``or the death of a first responder 
        working in any State, territory, or possession who dies while 
        serving in the line of duty,'' after ``while serving on active 
        duty,'';
            (3) by striking ``and'' after ``former officials of the 
        District of Columbia'' and inserting a comma; and
            (4) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        first responders working in the District of Columbia''.
    (b) First Responder Defined.--Such subsection is further amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``, United States Code; 
        and'' and inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) the term `first responder' means a `public safety 
        officer' as defined in section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime 
        Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1892

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# International HRA Empirical Study (NUREG/IA-0216)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 90-6349.

#### Colbert *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**CONSENT
        OF
        INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 
 We
        consent to the
        incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-120275,
        333-126310, 333-130391 and 333-142150 on Form S-3 of Galaxy Energy Corporation
        (“Galaxy”) of our report dated March 14, 2007, except for the period from
        inception (June 18, 2002) to November 30, 2006, for which the date is November
        12, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements,
        included in and incorporated by reference in the amended Annual Report on
        Form
        10-K of Galaxy for the year ended November 30, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
        HEIN
& ASSOCIATES LLP
 
 ***HEIN**&
ASSOCIATES
        LLP*
 
 Denver,
        Colorado
 November
        30,
        2007
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors

*Documentation of technical, regulatory, or administrative information about NRC programs or activities prepared by a contractor. Other contractor reports may be available in ADAMS.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 15, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 15, 2024
No. 91-594.

#### American National Red Cross *v.*S. G. et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 976.] Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
# L_2014277EN.01000901.xml

| 19.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 277/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 277/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 986/2014

of 18 September 2014

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2014 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 188 thereof,

1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

2

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

3

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2014 for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2014 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2014 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 September 2014.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2014-31.12.2014
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,240327 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,243729 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,268779 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,903674 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,973717 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2014-31.12.2014

(%)

1

09.4410

0,240327

2

09.4411

0,243729

3

09.4412

0,268779

4

09.4420

0,903674

6

09.4422

0,973717

---
#### CALEB OSBORNE vs. JOHN BALLEW.

An entry, under a deed, into a part of a tract of land, shall, as against a filero wrongdoer, be considered an entry into the whole — át not appearing that any olle else has possession of any part.

The Case of *Myrielc*v. *Bishop, 1*Hawks 485¡ cited and approved;

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Wilkes County, Spring Term 1851, his Honor Judge Battue presiding.

The action is *quaré clausum frágil,*and the plea, not guilty. On the trial the plaintiff gave in evidence a deed to himself) covering the *locus in (quo.*Tie also gave in evidence a grant to another person,- which likewise covered the *locus in quo ;*but he was unable to deduce title from the grantee to his bargainor. Upon taking his deed, the plaintiff went to reside in a house situate on the land and cultivated a field that was enclosed ; and soon afterwards the defendant committed the alleged trespass on an unenclosed part of the -wood land included in the plaintiff’s deed.

The counsel for the defendant moved the Court to instruct the jury, that the action could not be maintained, because the plaintiff had not shown himself to be in posses-; sion of the *locus in quo*by having it enclosed, or otherwise in his actual occupation, or by having a title for it against all the world. But the Court refused to give the instruction, and directed the jury, that the plaintiff’s actual entry under his deed into a part of the land covered by the deed *-w&s, prima facie,*sufficient to maintain trespass against the defendant, who set up no claim to the *locus in quo,*and was a mere wrong doer — no other person appearing to be' in possession of another part of the land under a conveyance, also covering the *locus in*quo.

*374
      *Qúion-,*for the plaintiff;

*Btsydert,*far the defendant.

llnrriN, íb .T.

Although, as between (wo persons clairri-ing under deeds which interfere,, the possession be with the better title, unless the other party have an actual possession within the disputed part, yet, as applied to the case of a mere wrong-doer, the instructions conform to our adjudications, and seetn, indeed, to follow from the doctrine of constructive possession, which is indispensable, in the present state of the country, to the protection of peaceable posses-' sors and claimants against lawless intrusions. The case of *Wyrick*v. *Bishop,*1 Hawks 485, is in point, and gives yery satisfactory reasons, why ail entf^ under a deed into a part'of a tract of larid should, .as against a mere wrongdoer, be considered an entry into the wnole-^-it not appear® ing that any one else has possession of any part.

Feu *Cvíxiáúj*Jüdgméiit affirmed,-
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VELLIYUR NOTT MALLIKARJU RAO, ALLEN CAPRON SIEVERT, Appellants

v.

JOHN W. SMITH, CLAIRE MCGUINESS, ANDREW

P. SHARRATT, Appellees

______________________

2020

- 1411

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,099.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D IPU A. D OSHI

, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by M EGAN R. W OOD ; J AY P HILIP L ESSLER , New York, NY.

B LAIR A. S ILVER

, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC, argued for appellees. A lso represented by J OSEPH J.

B ERGHAMMER

, K EVIN D AM

, E RIC J. H AMP

, M ICHAEL L.

K RASHIN

, Chicago, IL.

______________________ Case: 20-1411 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 01/12/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge

, C LEVENGER and

D YK

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 12, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 20-1411 Document: 68 Page: 2 Filed: 01/12/2021
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the
period ended  December 31, 2005 (the  "Report") of SMI Products,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James Charuk,  Chief Financial Officer of SMI Products,  Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated: May 10, 2006                          /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                             ___________________________
                                                 James Charuk
                                                 Chief Financial Officer