alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# NationalArchives andRecordsAdministration Office oftheFederal Register FEBI 3 2007
Ms. Nancy Molitor Regulations Division' (AGC-200) Office ofthe Chief Counsel Federal Aviation A-dministrat.ion;-ribT 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Ms. Molitor: The matenallisted In the attachment IS approved forincorporation by reference in 14CFR Part 39. This approval iscontingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publicarion(s) is effective on the effective date aryour final rule. Ifyon wish to enforce some other edition ofthepublication(s) approved, you must: 1. Publish notice ofthe change in theFederal Register, and amend the Code ofFederal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that acopy ofthat edition is on file atthe Office ofthe Federal Register; and 3. Notify me inwriting ofthe change. Sincerely, 

### R MONDA.MOSLEY Director ofthe Federal Register Federal Register Attorney: ~ 

### Attachment



## .

u.s. mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 21J740.Q()()1 Offic~ location: 800North Capitol SLIeet,NW, Suite 700,Washington, 

### rx: 200024244 Federal Register web sites: http://wl..IT\.Il.(lJchives.gov/federal-register and http://,vww.gpoi1CCess.gov/niUaIncorporation byReference

Docket No. FAA-2006-24036; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-04-AD; Amdl. 39-14947; AD 2007-04-15
Sicma Aero Seal Service Bulletin No. 90- Issue 2 25-005 and Annex 1, Issue 1 dated March 31,1999 dated March 31,1999 Docket No. FAA-2006-25470; DireclorateJdelllijier 2006-NM-090-AD; Amdl. 39-14942; AD 2007-04-10 Boeing Alert Service BulleUn 747-25A3353 dOlled December 9, 2004 Docket No. FAA-2006-25637; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-43-AD; Amelt. 39-14939; AD 2007-04-08
EADS SOCATA T6M Aira<llt Mandatory Service Bulletin S8 7(}-131, ATA No. 53 dated July 2005 Docket No. FAA-2006-25892; Directorate Identijier 2006-NM-120-AD; Amdt. 39-14941; AD 2007-04-09
EMBRAER EMBAAER Service Bulletin 145·30- Revision 2 0043 Service Bulletin 145LEG-30-0013 dOlled May 25, 2006 dated June 28, 2005 Docket No. FAA.-2006-25926; Directorate Identifier 2000-CE-17-AD; Amdl. 39-14946; AD 2003-17-05 R/
Shorts Service Bulletin No. 51- Revision NO.8 51 dated July 5, 2006 Docket No. FAA-2006-26235; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-65-AD; Amelf. 39-14945,- AD 2007-04-13
EADS SOCATA T8M Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin S8 7(}-130, ATA No. 32 dOlled January 2006 Docket No. FAA-2007-27/74.- Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-006-AD; Amdl. 39-14944; AD 2007-04-/2 Gippsland Aeronautics

Printed 11912007 Mandalory Service Issue 4 Bullelin SB-GA8-2002- 02 dOlledJanuary 4, 2007

Pagclofl
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Operating Commercial Power Reactors and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update - Annual Report for Calendar Year 2022 (NUREG-1885, Revision 16)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 16 (PDF – 3.11 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2023**Date Published:** September 2023

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D.e of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210 d.(e)), as amended, which states, "not less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year." Additionally, Section 170D.a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2210 d.(a)), as amended, grants the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) the authority to determine which licensed facilities must under go these security evaluations. The NRC is reporting the security response evaluation results for the Nation's fleet of operating commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) and Category I (CAT I) fuel cycle facilities, given the significance of the nature, form, and quantity of nuclear material at these facilities. With respect to NPPs, the scope of this report includes those undergoing decommissioning but not yet transitioned to a dry-storage independent spent fuel storage installation due to the continued implementation of Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 73, "Physical Protection of Plants and Materials." This report includes a comprehensive overview of the combined results of the security programs for calendar year (CY) 2022. To aid in understanding the context of how the NRC conducts evaluations, this report also provides a description of relevant security programs, including the reactor oversight process (ROP); physical and cyber security baseline inspection programs for NPPs; a force-on-force (FOF) evaluation description; and CAT I fuel cycle facility security oversight program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 10, 2023
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-40690 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HECTOR RIVERA-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-123-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hector Rivera-Rivera was convicted of illegal reentry and was sentenced to 21 months of impriso n m e n t a nd two years of supervised release. RiveraRivera now appeals, asserting that the written judgment contains a special condition of supervised release that was not orally pronounc e d b y t h e district court at senten c i n g a n d arguing that this court should remand his case to the di s t rict court with an order to conform the written judgment to the o r a l pronouncement. The written special condition which he seeks to have stricken U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 27 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40690 Document: 00511647605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2011No. 10-40690

provides, “Within 72 hours of being placed on supervised release or upon comp l e t i o n of the custody sentence, the defendant shall surrender to a duly authorized immigration official.” We are required to raise the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1 9 8 7 ) ; s e e also Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding that mootness must be raised sua sponte). This case fails to satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement because there is no concrete and continuing injury to the appellant. See Spencer

v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1 , 7 ( 1 9 9 8)

. On July 29, 2011, Rivera-River a was released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, commenced his t e rm of supervised release, and was removed from the United States. The triggerin g t i m e of the requirement that Rivera-Rivera surrender to immigration of f ici als, i.e., 72 hours from his release from custody or his placement on supervise d release, has already transpired. Therefore, any argument relating to this special condition is moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis , 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007). The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

2 Case: 10-40690 Document: 00511647605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report.



|                  |  |                         |  | 
|----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 2, 2007 |  |                         |  | 
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | /s/ Fredric N. Eshelman |  | 
|                  |  | Fredric N. Eshelman     |  | 
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldiers from All Over Pacific Participate in Best Medic Competition

By Pfc. Ethan Valetski 5th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In the Matter of Lenny L. Jacobs, Respondent, v County of Nassau, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 610]

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered January 8, 2003, as amended by order entered August 12, 2003, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, with costs.

The granting of the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a provident exercise of discretion *(see Rosas v 397 Broadway Corp.,*309 AD2d 913 [2003]; *Medley v Cichon,*305 AD2d 643 [2003]). Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Goldstein and Crane, *JJ.,*concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TONYA L. RANDLEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FIRELANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2024-1813

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Ohio in No. 3:24-cv-00760-JJH, Judge 

Jeffrey J. Helmick.

______________________

Before PROST, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

The court considers the parties’ responses to the May 

23, 2024 order to show cause.

Firelands Habitat for Humanity filed a foreclosure action against Ms. Randleman in a state court in Ohio. Ms. 

Randleman removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, but that court 

later issued an order remanding the case to state court, explaining the court “lacks original jurisdiction over the 

Case: 24-1813 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 07/22/2024
2 RANDLEMAN v. FIRELANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC.

foreclosure action” because “[t]he foreclosure action filed by 

Firelands Habitat for Humanity in state court was based 

on state law” and Ms. Randleman’s “[f]ederal counterclaims and defenses are inadequate to confer federal jurisdiction.” ECF No. 1-2 at 9–10 (citation omitted). 

Our jurisdiction to review decisions of federal district 

courts generally extends only to cases arising under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review 

to the district court from the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cases 

involving certain damages claims against the United 

States “not exceeding $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1346(a)(2); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292(c)(1). This case is outside of that limited subject 

matter jurisdiction. 

Though Firelands Habitat for Humanity urges dismissal, we deem it the better course to transfer pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Sixth Circuit, which can address Firelands Habitat for Humanity’s contentions regarding delay and whether appellate review is precluded under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal and all its filings are transferred to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631.

July 22, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

Case: 24-1813 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 07/22/2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50376 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS BRIONEZ-VILLELA, also known as Jesus Villela-Villela Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-CR-34-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Brionez-Villela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brionez-Villela has not filed a response. Our independent reviewofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Gregoire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Taleo Corporation on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Taleo Corporation.



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    Michael Gregoire             
|Name:  |  | Michael Gregoire                    
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | February 28, 2011                   

I, Douglas C. Jeffries, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Taleo Corporation on Form
10-K for year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Taleo Corporation.



|       |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    Douglas C. Jeffries                          
|Name:  |  | Douglas C. Jeffries                                 
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | February 28, 2011
No. 91-401.

#### Holtzman *v.*Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.
Board of
Directors

    22nd Century
Group, Inc. (f/k/a Touchstone Mining Limited)

    11923 SW
37 Terrace

    Miami, FL
33175

     


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Loan
      Forgiveness

            


    

     


    Gentlemen:

     


    On
February 10,2010 Paramount Strategy Corp. made a $32,327 loan (the “Loan”) to
22nd
Century Group, Inc. (formerly known as Touchstone Mining Limited) (the
“Company”) which is represented by a 10% Convertible Promissory Note in the
principal amount for $32,327 made by the Company in favor of Paramount Strategy
Corp. (the “Note”).

    


    Pursuant
to the tenn of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization by
and among Company, 22nd Century
Acquisition Subsidiary, LLC and 22nd Century
Limited, LLC, and in consideration of the transactions contemplated thereby (the
“Merger”), and for other good and valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby
agrees to make a capital contribution of the Note to the Company and in so doing
forgives the entire principal balance of the Loan and the Note, together with
all accrued and unpaid interest thereon. Such contribution and associated
forgiveness shall be effective immediately prior to the closing of the
Merger.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    PARAMOUNT
STRATEGY CORP.

    


    
      
        
          	
                  By:

                	/s/
      Andrew Meacle  	 
	
                  Name:
      Andrew Meacle

                	 
	
                  Title:
      Director

                	 


        

      

    

    


    Date:
December 21, 2010
VIAE-MAIL 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Jessica Fernandez 

Registration Manager 

Bayer Crop Science LP 

Research Triangle Park, NC 

27709 

Subject: Fenamidone Data Call-In (DCI) Package for Registration Review 

Dear Ms. Fernandez: 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated the registration review for fenamidone in 

March 2014 with the opening of a docket and publication of a preliminary work plan. The final 

work plan was issued in September 2014. Both of these documents, and supporting materials, may 

be found in docket number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0048. The Agency is now issuing a DCI to require 

submission of data for use in the registration review of fenamidone. You must respond to this DCI 

within 90 days of receipt. Further instructions are provided in the attached DCI package. 

When initially scoping the registration review for fenamidone, EPA did not identify the need for any 

additional studies to evaluate potential effects on pollinators. However, since the issuance of the 

June 2014 Guidance for Assessing Pesticide Risks to Bees\ EPA has begun to require these data where 

applicable. Therefore, the final work plan for fenamidone contained pollinator studies not listed in 

the initial work plan. Three additional studies have been added to the fenamidone DCI to ensure 

that EPA has the entire suite of pollinator studies listed in the guidance document. For fenamidone, 

the additional pollinator study requirements are included in Table 1 below. 

Table 1. Pollinator Data Requirements for Fenamidone 

Guideline# Study 

850.3040** Field testing for pollinators 

Non-Guideline** Residues in pollen and nectar/ field residue analysis 

Non-Guideline** (OECD 75) Semi-field testing for pollinators (tunnel or colony feeding studies) 

**Tier 2 and 3 (Semi-field and full field colony-level studies) The need for a higher tier test for pollinators will 

be determined based upon lower-tiered tests and/ or other lines of data and the need for a refined pollinator 

risk assessment. 

1 http://www2.epa.gov/sites/productionlfiles/2014-6/documents/pollinator risk assessment guidance 06 19 14.pdf 
Further instructions for responding to the DCI are enclosed. If you have any questions about this 

letter, the fenamidone registration review, or the generic DCis for fenamidone, please contact 

Christina Scheltema of my staff at (703)308-2201 or scheltema.christina@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Kelly Sherman, Chief 

Risk Mitigation and Implementation Branch III 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

cc: Tony Kish, Product Manager, Registration Division
Working
Capital Loan Agreement

     

    Borrower : Shanghai Vomart
Auto Parts Co.,  Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Party
A)

     

    Lender : YBM Group China
Co.,  Ltd.  ( hereinafter referred to as
Party B)

     

    In order
to clarify responsibility and to maintain good credit, Party A and Party B,
through mutual consultations, hereby have entered the following contract
(“Contract”):

     

    Article
I  Loan amount and usage

     

    Party A,
currently in its marketing development and expansion period, lacks sufficient
funds, and hereby A applies for loan from Party B. Party B agrees to provide
Party A with loans with a total amount no more than RMB 50 million as Party A’s
working capital turnover.

     

    Article
II. Term of loan

     

    The term
of loan in this contract is three years.

     

    Article
III  Loan method

     

    Party A
shall file an application for each loan. Upon Party B’s examination and
approval, Party B shall transfer the loan amount to Party A’s designated
account.

     

    Article
IV  Loan  interest

     

    All loans
under the Contract  are interest-free.

     

    This
contract shall take effect after being signed or sealed by both parties. It
shall expire automatically upon being paid off by Party A.

     

    This
contract is in duplicate. One for Party A and one for Party B.

     

    Borrower
(seal): Shanghai Vomart Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

     

    Date: May
10, 2008

     

    Lender
(seal): YBM Group China Co., Ltd.

     

    Date: May
10, 2008
Third Amendment to The Progressive Corporation 2003 Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO 

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2003 INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation 2003
Incentive Plan, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”) is currently in effect; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
believes that it is desirable to further amend the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 6(d), entitled “Buyout Provisions,” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 


 

	 	2.	Except as expressly modified hereby, the terms of the Plan shall be unchanged.