FAQ
    
    AGREEMENT STATES
    
    Facility Locator
    
    What's New
    
    Site Help
    
    Index A-Z
    
    Contact Us
    
    Email Updates
      
      
      
      
       
      Report a Safety Concern
                  Search
        Nuclear Reactors
  
  Power Reactors
Research & Test ReactorsOperating Reactors
New ReactorsOperator Licensing
Research ActivitiesNuclear Reactor Quick LinksNuclear Materials
  
  Types of Nuclear Materials
Fuel Cycle Facilities
Medical, Industrial, & Academic UsesUranium Recovery
Materials TransportationMaterials Environmental Reviews
National Materials ProgramNuclear Materials Quick LinksRadioactive Waste
  
  Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
Low-Level Waste
Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
High-Level WasteUranium Mill Tailings
Low-Level Waste Disposal
High-Level Waste DisposalStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Research ActivitiesRadioactive Waste Quick LinksNuclear Security
  
  Domestic Safeguards
Information Security
Radioactive Material SecurityRequired Reporting for Clearance Holders
Insider Threat Program for Licensees
CybersecurityCriminal History & Firearms Checks
Contact UsPublic Meetings & Involvement
  
  The NRC Approach to Open Government
About Meetings Open to the Public
Conferences & SymposiaDocuments for Comment
NRC Rules and Petitions
Facilitating Stakeholder InvolvementNRC Information Quality Guidelines
Subscribe to E-mail UpdatesCommission Schedule
Public Meeting ScheduleAdjudications (Hearings)
Adjudicatory SubmissionsNRC Library
  
  Basic References
Document Collections
ADAMS Public Documents
Public Document Room
LSN LibraryFOIA & Privacy Act
Photos & Videos
Records Management
Training CoursesFAQ Index
Get Copies of Documents
Withholding of Sensitive Information
Controlled Unclassified Information Program (CUI)Electronic Hearing DocketAbout NRC
  
  The Commission
Organization & Functions
Governing Legislation
Plans, Budget, & Performance
Locations
History
Values
Direction-Setting & Policymaking
Research Activities
Radiation ProtectionFire Protection
Safety Culture
How We Regulate
Emergency Preparedness & Response
Public Affairs
Congressional Affairs
Enforcement
International Programs
State & Tribal ProgramsAlternative Dispute Resolution Programs
Privacy Program
Civil Rights Program
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Contracting Opportunities
Small Businesses
Grant Opportunities
Generic SchedulesOther Links
  
  FAQ
Glossary
Facility Locator
What's NewSite Help
Index A-Z
Contact Us
Email UpdatesNRC Facebook
NRC Twitter Feed
NRC Linkedin
NRC Youtube Channel
NRC Flickr Gallery
NRC Blog Archived
NRC Email Subscriptions - GovDelivery Home
          NRC Library  Document Collections  NUREG-Series Publications  Publications Prepared by NRC ContractorsExperimental Measurement of Suppression Pool Void Distribution During Blowdown in Support of Generic Issue 193 (NUREG/CR-7186)

On this page: Publication Information AbstractDownload complete document NUREG/CR-7186 (PDF - 14.49 MB)Publication Information **Manuscript Completed:** March 2011**Date Published:** September 2014 **Prepared by:** M. Ishii, T. Hibiki, S. Rassame, M. Griffiths, D. Y. Lee, P. Ju, J. Yang, S. L. Sharma, and S. W. Choi Purdue University School of Nuclear Engineering West Lafayette, IN 47907 A. Ireland, NRC Project Manager A. Velazquez-Lozada, NRC Technical Monitor Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 Availability Notice Abstract The possible failure of an Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) train due to a large amount of entrained gas in the ECCS pump suction piping during a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is one of the potential engineering problems faced in a Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) power plant. The void fraction distribution and void penetration in the Suppression Pool (SP) during blowdown from a LOCA are key parameters necessary to analyze potential gas intrusion into the ECCS pump suction piping. To study void fraction distribution and void penetration in the Suppression Pool (SP) during blowdown, two sets of experiments, namely steady state tests and transient tests, were conducted using the Purdue University Multi-Dimensional Integral Test Assembly for ESBWR applications (PUMA-E) facility. The design of the test apparatus used is based on a scaling analysis from a prototypical BWR containment (Mark I) with consideration of downcomer size, SP water level and downcomer water submergence depth. Several instruments were installed to obtain the required experimental data such as the gas volumetric flow, void fraction, pressure, and temperature. For the steady state tests, the air was injected through a downcomer pipe in the SP. Sixteen tests with various air volumetric flow rates, downcomer void conditions, and air velocity ramp rates were performed. Two periods of the experiment, namely, the initial air injection period and the quasi-steady period are observed. The initial air injection period gives the maximum void penetration depth. The quasi-steady period provides less void penetration, but with oscillation in the void penetration. It was found that the air volumetric flow rate has a minor effect on the void fraction distribution and void penetration during the initial air injection period in the range of high air volumetric flow rate conditions while it strongly impacts the void fraction distribution and void penetration during the quasi-steady state for the entire range of air flow rate conditions. The initial downcomer void conditions were found to strongly affect the void fraction distribution and void penetration during the initial period. The air velocity ramp rates were found to have a minor impact on the void distribution and penetration in both periods. For the transient tests, sequential flows of air, steam-air mixtures, and pure steam with the various flow rate conditions were injected from the Drywell (DW) through a downcomer pipe in the SP. Eight tests were conducted at various gas volumetric fluxes at the downcomer, two different downcomer sizes, and two different initial air concentration conditions in the DW. Three periods of the experiment, namely, initial period, quasi-steady period, and chugging period are observed. The void penetration depth was maximum in the initial period and reduced in the quasi-steady period. The penetration of noncondensable gases during the chugging period, which occurs at the end of the transient, reached depths similar to those observed during the initial period. It was determined that the void distribution and area of void penetration in the SP is governed by the gas volumetric flux at the downcomer and by air concentration in the downcomer. It is noted that the transient conditions were well scaled for the initial period but not necessarily well scaled to simulate the chugging phenomena. Chugging is a complex phenomenon that depends primarily on periodic sudden condensation of steam into colder water, but also depends on gas volumetric flux, noncondensable gas concentration, frequency of the phenomenon, heat transfer, and subcooling, as well as the downcomer and suppression pool geometry. The rudimentary scaling methods used here are not suitable for use with such complex phenomenon. Instead, more specific and advanced scaling techniques would be needed. 
      
      Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021  Home
NEWS RELEASES

EVENT REPORTS

ADAMS

OPEN GOV

DIGITAL GOVERNMENT

THE STUDENT CORNER

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

FOR DEVELOPERS
        About Us
STRATEGIC PLAN

BUDGET & PERFORMANCE

AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT

LICENSE FEES

HISTORY OF THE NRC

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

NRC ETHICS

AGENCY STATUS

CONTACT US
        Popular Documents
INFO DIGEST

FACT SHEETS & BROCHURES

FORMS

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS APPLICATION

ADJUDICATORY SUBMISSIONS

NRC REPORTS - NUREG

NRC REGULATIONS - 10-CFR

INSPECTION REPORTS

PLAIN WRITING

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

RULEMAKING

GLOSSARY
        Stay Connected
    
    
    
    
    United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    
    
    
    
    Regulations.gov

USA.gov

FOIA

Whistleblower Protection

No Fear EEO

Inspector General

Site Map

Accessibility

Privacy Policy

Site Disclaimer

For Employees