alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>





                                   EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and
Officers of Mykrolis Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and
appoint C. William Zadel, Jean-Marc Pandraud, Bertrand Loy and Peter W. Walcott
and each of them individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to
execute on behalf of the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of the
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and all such amendments
or additional instruments related thereto which such attorneys and agents may
deem to be necessary and desirable to enable the Corporation to comply with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any
regulations, orders, or other requirements of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of
said documents, including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing,
power and authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on
his behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form
10-K Annual Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in
connection with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be
done by virtue thereof.

SIGNATURE                                   TITLE                    DATE

   /s/ C. WILLIAM ZADEL           Chairman, Chief Executive    February 7, 2002
--------------------------         Officer and Director
     C. William Zadel


  /s/  MICHAEL A. BRADLEY         Director                     February 7, 2002
--------------------------
     Michael A. Bradley


  /s/  ROBERT E. CALDWELL         Director                     February 7, 2002
--------------------------
    Robert E. Caldwell


 /s/  MICHAEL P.C. CARNS          Director                     February 7, 2002
--------------------------
    Michael P.C. Carns


 /s/ DANIEL W. CHRISTMAN          Director                     February 7, 2002
--------------------------
   Daniel W. Christman


 /s/   THOMAS O. PYLE             Director                     February 7, 2002
--------------------------
     Thomas O. Pyle
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 273RD DISTRIC T COURT OF SHELBY CO UNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 2 9th

day of August, 2014 , the cau se upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JOHN KEELY BATTLES , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00060

- CR; Trial Court No. 10CR18,060

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its or der in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that the re was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texa s in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler , this the 21 st day of May , 201 5

.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30276 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES ARNOLD, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-207-1-F

January 14, 2002 Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Arnold, III, wishes to appeal the sentence imposed

f ollowing his plea of guilty to one count of bank rob bery in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). His notice of appeal was filed

late and the district court denied his motion for leave to file a

late notice of appeal.

Arnold argues that the district court e rred in denying his2

motion to file a la te notice of appeal because it conducted an

incomplete inquiry into whether the delay was caused by excusable

n eglect. Arnold seeks only to challenge the district court’s

application of the Sentencing Guidelines and the resultant

sentence.

Arnold in his signed written plea agreement made an express,

informed and knowing waiver of his right to appeal except in the

case where the sentence imposed exceeded the statutory maximum or

where the sentence “constitutes an upward depar ture from the

Guideline range deemed most applicable by the sentencing court.”

This was also fully explained to him by the district court at the

Rule 11 hearing. Because neither of the two stated conditions are

implicated by the sentence imposed by the district court, this

court is precluded from reviewing this issue. S ee United States v.

Gonzalez

, 259 F.3d 355, 358 (5th Cir. 2001). Because the issue he

seeks to raise on appeal is precluded from review, remand for

consideration of the timeline ss of the appeal notice would be

futile. S ee United States v. Alvarez

, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.

2000).

APPEAL DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Edward W. Stone, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, of Velocity ExpressCorporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation, and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Dennis
Harkins, President and Chief Financial Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the ”Company”),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of the Company
for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (“the Company Form 10- K”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the Company Form 10- K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dennis Harkins
              
              March 31, 2010Dennis
      Harkins – President and Chief Financial Officer
              
              Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          53,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    534,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               597,341
<PP&E>                                       5,023,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,367,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,055,097
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,343
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,287,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,367,370
<SALES>                                      1,886,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,886,769
<CGS>                                        1,475,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,898,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             364,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,371,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,372,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (913,350)
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,286,228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)


</TABLE>
No. 86-243.

#### City of Houston, Texas *v.*Hill.

C. A. 5th

Cir. [Probable jurisdiction noted, *ante,*p. 811.] Motion of Na*1080tional Institute of Municipal Law Officers for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*out of time denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Review of Radiation-Induced Concrete Degradation and Potential Implications for Structures Exposed to High Long-Term Radiation Levels in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-7280, ANL/EVS-20/8)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7280 (PDF – 14.27 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2020**Date Published:** July 2021

**Prepared by:**B. Biwer1D. Ma1Y. Xi2Y. Jing2Environmental Science Division1Argonne National LaboratoryLemont, IL 60439Department of Civil, Environmental2  and Architectural Engineering,University of ColoradoBoulder, CO 80309-0428M.SircarTechnical Lead, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

*Aging of Concrete and Civil Structures*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 19, 2021
Exhibit
32
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Ameralink, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
Freiheit, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Robert
Freiheit
  Robert
Freiheit
 Chief
Executive Officer
 and Chief
Financial Officer
 
 April 14,
2009
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The Employment of Empirical Data and Bayesian Methods in Human Reliability Analysis: A Feasibility Study (NUREG/CR-6949)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6949, (PDF - 825 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2007**Date Published:** December 2007 

**Edited by:** B. Hallbert, INL A. Kolaczkowski, SAIC

Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID 83415

Science Applications International Corporation 10260 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121

E. Lois, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6496

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is addressing issues related to the quality of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), including issues related to human reliability analysis (HRA) performed as part of PRA. Among the issues of concern is an inadequate use of human performance data in the estimation of human error probabilities (HEPs), as well as in testing or otherwise validating underlying models used in HRA to predict human performance under cognitively demanding conditions. In order to address issues related to the use of human performance data in HRA, the NRC is developing the Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) database (NUREG/CR-6903). In addition, in August 2005, the NRC hosted an expert workshop on the use of Bayesian and other quantitative formalisms in conjunction with empirical data, such as that available in HERA, to improve both the estimation of human error probabilities and the underlying assumptions and quantitative algorithms employed by different HRA methods.

This report contains a collection of papers that were produced as a result of the workshop. It also summarizes the peer review comments of a draft version of this report, includes conclusions about the feasibility of using empirical data and quantitative methods for HRA, and provides suggestions on how to proceed to address the issues under consideration.

**Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**

This NUREG does not contain information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

**Public Protection Notification**

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Technical Report on Material Selection and Processing Guidelines for BWR Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping (NUREG-0313, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0313 (PDF - 2.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1987**Date Published:** January 1988

**Prepared by:**W. S. Hazelton, W. H. Koo

Division of Engineering and Systems Technology			Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation			U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission			Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report updates and supersedes the technical recommendations of NUREG-0313,"Technical Report on Material Selection and Processing Guidelines for BWRCoolant Pressure Boundary Piping," published in July 1977, and its subsequentrevision published in July 1980.

This report provides the technical bases for the NRC staff's revised recommendedmethods to control the intergranular stress corrosion cracking susceptibilityof BWR piping. For piping that does not fully comply with the materialselection, testing, and processing guideline combinations of this document,varying degrees of augmented inservice inspection are recommended. Thisrevision also includes guidance and NRC staff recommendations (not requirements)regarding crack evaluation and weld overlay repair methods for long-termoperation or for continuing interim operation of plants until a more permanentsolution is implemented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, April 27, 2022
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In Re: Texas State Silica Products Liability Litigation

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00251

- CV

Trial court case number: 2004

- 70000

Trial court: 333rd District Cou rt of Harris County

The Court REQUESTS a response from appellees to appellant’s Motion to Extend Time

to File Notice of Appeal. The response, if any, is due within fifteen (15) days of the date of this

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 31, 2015
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Shou-Kang Chen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 26, 2012



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shih-Jye Cheng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda)
LTD. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes
of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: April 18, 2016



/s/ Shih-Jye ChengName:

Shih-Jye ChengTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer