alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [DA 15-54]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice serves as final opportunity for ACT Telecommunications, Inc. (ACT) to respond to the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security (Agencies) request that the Commission terminate and declare null, void and no longer in effect, the international 214 authorization issued to ACT by the Commission. The Agencies state that ACT has failed to comply with commitments and undertakings with these Agencies, which is a condition on the 214 authorization issued by the Commission. The FCC now provides final notice to ACT that it intends to declare ACT's international 214 authorization terminated for failure to comply with conditions of its authorization.

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before February 11, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

                        ACT should address its response to the Chief, International Bureau and file it in File No. ITC-214-20081201-00519 via IBFS at                         *http://licensing.fcc.gov/​myibfs/​pleading.do.*                         It should also copy the Associate Chief of the Policy Division, International Bureau at                         *David.Krech@fcc.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David Krech, Policy Division, International Bureau, at (202) 418-7443 or                         *David.Krech@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proceeding in this Notice is treated as a “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.

Federal Communications Commission.

Howard Griboff,

Acting Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2015-01441 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2015420EN.01000101.xml

| 16.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/1

---

DECISION

(2015/C 420/01)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

| — | Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (2) and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (3), in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (2) and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (3), in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

1

2

3

| — | Having regard to the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment, |
| --- | --- |

—

Having regard to the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment,

| — | Having regard to the expiry date of 31 December 2015 set for the following European Parliament reserve lists:






  — | AD/1/12, PE/96/S, PE/106/S, PE/110/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/154/S, AST/4/11 and AST/5/11, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Having regard to the expiry date of 31 December 2015 set for the following European Parliament reserve lists:

—

AD/1/12, PE/96/S, PE/106/S, PE/110/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/154/S, AST/4/11 and AST/5/11,

| — | Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 28 October 2015, |
| --- | --- |

—

Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 28 October 2015,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

| | AD/1/12, PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11 and AST/5/11 |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/12, PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11 and AST/5/11

shall be extended until 31 December 2016.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

| | PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S and PE/154/S |
| --- | --- |

PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S and PE/154/S

shall not be extended.

Done at Luxembourg, 13 November 2015.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Culture Common Language (NUREG-2165)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2165 (PDF – 621.28 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2014**Date Published:** March 2014

**Prepared by:** Molly Keefe1, Ronald Frahm1, Kamishan Martin1, Rebecca Sigmon1, Undine Shoop1, Stephanie Morrow2, Diane Sieracki2, Ray Powell3, Scott Shaeffer4, Jack Rutkowski5, and Eric Ruesch61Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation2Office of Enforcement3Region I4Region II5Region III6Region IV

Molly Keefe, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The importance of a healthy nuclear safety culture has been demonstrated by a number of significant events in the United States and throughout the world. Use of consistent definitions and terms to describe a model safety culture is a first step in ensuring consistent development, implementation, and monitoring of safety culture. This report documents the outcomes of public workshops to develop a common language to describe safety culture in the nuclear industry. These workshops, held in December 2011, April 2012, November 2012, and January 2013, included panelists from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the nuclear power industry, and the public. This report presents a suggested common language, agreed upon by NRC staff and the nuclear industry for classifying and grouping traits and attributes of a healthy nuclear safety culture.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
P.1 

OAR Box 1313 

Prepped by LaTeia Shed 

Document Number: 

76) ll-B-50 

Docket Number: 

A-88-02 

Printed 6/12/2008 9:03:30 AM Sheet 76 of 99 
P.2 

"TX - 6 - SO 

A-88-02 

Information on health or risk assessment was removed from the 

docket. This information was compiled before the Clean Air 

A ct Amendments (1990) but was not used in the development of 

t he chromium NESHAP. 

,, o, \ 

f8° 

# 

A

1 

\\%5 5 '/>^
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Delores Reynolds, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 339]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered May 20, 1993, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminally negligent homicide, and sentencing her to intermittent incarceration for four weekends and to 100 hours of community service, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s boyfriend, the victim, arrived at defendant’s apartment with a gun, a .380 semiautomatic. Defendant, who lacked any experience with guns, told police that she removed the ammunition magazine from the gun and placed the magazine and the gun in her closet for safekeeping. Later, when returning the gun to the victim, defendant cautioned him to leave the gun unloaded, as she thought she had. She then pointed the gun at the victim and pulled the trigger, causing the gun to discharge killing him. Such evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), was legally sufficient to establish that defendant failed to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death to the victim and that her actions constituted a gross deviation from the standard that a reasonable person would have observed in the same situation (Penal Law § 15.05 [4]). Nor was the verdict against the weight of the evidence. "It is obvious that one who fails to perceive the possible danger inherent in holding a gun to another when he has no intention of pulling a trigger is at least negligent.” *(People v Stanfield,*44 AD2d 780, 781, *affd*36 NY2d 467.) Here, defendant pointed the gun and pulled the trigger, but, because of her inexperience with guns, did not realize that she had not completely disarmed the gun. This lack of knowledge about how the gun operated does not negate defendant’s guilt. On the contrary, the evidence showed that a reasonable person inexperienced with guns would not have presumed to disarm a gun of this type and would have perceived a substantial risk of death in pointing and pulling the trigger *(see, People v Rosario,*78 AD2d 864). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED 
 Amendment No. 1
to the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Harman
International Industries, Incorporated Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of December 8, 2010. 
 1. Section 3(a) of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10 of this Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued or transferred (i) upon the exercise of Option Rights or
Appreciation Rights, (ii) as Restricted Shares and released from substantial risks of forfeiture thereof, (iii) as Restricted Share Units, (iv) in payment of Performance Units that have been earned, (v) as awards to Non-Officer
Directors or (vi) in payment of dividend equivalents paid with respect to awards made under this Plan, shall not exceed in the aggregate 7,860,000 shares of Common Stock. Such shares of Common Stock may be shares of original issuance or
treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing.” 
 2. Section 3(c) of the Plan shall be amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows: 
 “(c) Notwithstanding anything in this Section 3, or elsewhere in
this Plan, to the contrary and subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10 of this Plan, (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock actually issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options
shall not exceed 7,100,000 shares of Common Stock; (ii) no Eligible Participant shall be granted Option Rights and Appreciation Rights, in the aggregate, for more than 750,000 shares of Common Stock during any calendar year;
(iii) non-option awards denominated in shares of Common Stock (including, without limitation, awards of Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units) shall not exceed 2,883,333 shares of Common Stock, in the aggregate; and (iv) no Eligible
Participant shall be granted during any calendar year non-option awards denominated in shares of Common Stock (including, without limitation, awards of Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units) representing more than 750,000 shares of Common
Stock, in the aggregate.” 
 IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the undersigned Secretary of Harman International Industries,
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), certifies that the foregoing amendment to the Harman International Industries, Incorporated Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan was duly adopted by the Board
of Directors of the Company on September 26, 2003 and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation on December 8, 2010. 







 
	
	 /s/ Todd A. Suko

	Todd A. Suko,
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of A M Marketing,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 15, 2004                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics; Meeting 
Standards Subcommittee

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory 
committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) 
Subcommittee on Standards
    Time and Date: February 26, 2015, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. EST
    Place: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health 
Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Auditorium A and B, Hyattsville, 
Maryland 20782, (301) 458-4524.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The purpose of this hearing is to review and discuss 
the current status of selected administrative simplification topics 
of interest to the National Committee on Vital and Health 
Statistics.
    The objectives of this hearing will be to (1) review, discuss 
and consider for recommendations the operating rules presented for 
adoption for four HIPAA transactions--Health Care Claims, 
Enrollment/Disenrollment, Premium Payment, and Prior Authorization; 
and (2) discuss and consider suggestions of the Review Committee 
evaluation criteria for existing standards, code sets, identifiers, 
and operating rules.
    Contact Person for More Information: Debbie M. Jackson, Acting 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 
2339, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4614 or Terri 
Deutsch, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of E-
Health Standards and Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, 
Maryland 21244, telephone (410) 786-9462. Program information as 
well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members are 
available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further information including an agenda 
will be posted when available.
    Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the 
CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) 
as soon as possible.

    Dated: January 22, 2015.
James Scanlon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (Science and 
Data Policy), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2015-01537 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-05-P
Argued November 28,

affirmed December 10, 1973

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*BOYD ROBERT BURNS and RICHARD LEE SUNDQUIST (No. 20435), *Respondents.*

516 P2d 479

*John Hunnicutt,*Deputy District Attorney, St. Helens, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

*Robert P. VanNatta,*St. Helens, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were VanNatta & Petersen, St. Helens.

*591Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and ThorNTON, Judges.

FOLEY, J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order of the trial court suppressing evidence. It appears from the order allowing the motion to suppress that a hearing on the motion was held at which testimony was produced by the state. However, the state in its designation of record designated from the transcript only that portion'in which the court gave its reasons for allowing the motion to suppress. Thus we do not have before us the facts1 from which to determine the correctness of the court’s ruling.

 The state concedes in its brief that this was a warrantless search and that

> “[t]he law is clear that a warrantless search is prima facie unreasonable. *State v. Keith,*2 Or App 133, 140-41; 465 P2d 724 (1970). Furthermore, the State carries the burden, when the search is challenged by a Motion to Suppress, to show that there is some circumstance that would be sufficiently strong in the eyes of the law to overcome the constitutional guarantees against warrantless searches and seizures. Oreg. Const. Art. I, Sec. 9; U. S. Const. Amend. IV.”

> In ruling on the motion to suppress the court said:

> <£# * ***pm satisfied * * * there was not * * * probable cause, to go ahead and search the motor vehicle or ask for consent to go ahead and search.

This statement is erroneous. There is no requirement *592that an. officer have probable cause to search before asking for consent to search. The state contends that the court’s erroneous statement is ground for reversal. But to sustain the state’s position and reverse the trial court, it is necessary to have before us facts from which it can be ascertained that valid consent to search was, in fact, given by defendants. Without a record which discloses these facts, we are unable to make this determination. Although the reason given by the court for its decision was erroneous, we cannot condude the ruling was incorrect because the state failed to carry its burden of furnishing sufficient record to demonstrate otherwise.

Affirmed.

1

 The state in its brief purports to set forth the facts surrounding the seizure but they are disputed by defendant and not supported by any record.
Exhibit 32.4





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Anthony J. Bergmann, the Principal Financial Officer of Capricor
Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(1) the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered
by the Report.



Date: April 1, 2019



|/s/ Anthony J. Bergmann                                        | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name: Anthony J. Bergmann                                      | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann  |  | 
|                       |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann      |  | 
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016115DE.01005001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 29.4.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 115/50 |

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1393/2014 der Kommission vom 20. Oktober 2014 zur Erstellung eines Rückwurfplans für bestimmte Fischereien auf pelagische Arten in den nordwestlichen Gewässern

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 370 vom 30. Dezember 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_370_R_TOC)
)

Seite 27, Artikel 3 Buchstabe d:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „d) | bei Eberfisch (Caproidae) bis zu 1 % (2015) bzw. bis zu 0,75 % (2016) in der Fischerei auf Stöcker (Trachurus spp.) mit pelagische Schleppnetze einsetzenden pelagischen Frosttrawlern in den ICES-Gebieten VI und VII.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „d) | bei Eberfisch (Caproidae) bis zu 1 % (2015) bzw. bis zu 0,75 % (2016) der zulässigen Gesamtfangmenge (TAC) in der Fischerei auf Stöcker (Trachurus spp.) mit pelagische Schleppnetze einsetzenden pelagischen Frosttrawlern in den ICES-Gebieten VI und VII.“ |

---