alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011219EN.01001503.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2011 — Bamba v Council

(Case T-86/11) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons)

2011/C 219/21

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nadiany Bamba (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: P. Haïk and J. Laffont, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Cujo and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, in so far as they concern Ms Nadiany Bamba; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, in so far as they concern Ms Nadiany Bamba;

| 2. | Maintains the effects of Decision 2011/18 in respect of Ms Bamba until the annulment of Regulation No 25/2011 takes effect; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Maintains the effects of Decision 2011/18 in respect of Ms Bamba until the annulment of Regulation No 25/2011 takes effect;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Ms Bamba; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Ms Bamba;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# KENO3D Visualization Tool for KENO V.a and KENO-VI Geometry Models (NUREG/CR-6662)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6662 (PDF - 1.51 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2000**Date Published:** June 2000

**Prepared by:** J. E. Horwedel, S. M. Bowman

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6370

H. D. Felsher, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code B0304

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Criticality safety analyses often require detailed modeling of complex geometries. Effective visualization tools can enhance checking the accuracy of these models. This report describes the KENO3D visualization tool developed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to provide visualization of KENO V.a and KENO-VI criticality safety models. The development of KENO3D is part of the current efforts to enhance the SCALE (**S**tandardized **C**omputer **A**nalyses for **L**icensing **E**valuations) computer software system.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Human Performance Characterization in theReactor Oversight Process (NUREG/CR-6775, INEEL/EXT-01-01167)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6775 (PDF - 5.60 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2001**Date Published:**September 2002 

**Prepared by:** David I. Gertman, Bruce P. Hallbert, David A. Prawdzik Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-3129

Eugene A. Trager, NRC Program Manager J. Kramer, NRC Technical Monitor

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code E8238

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A review of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) and its characterization of human performance was performed by the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) to describe the means by which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) monitors, analyzes and feeds back information on human performance. Review of detailed human performance findings and trends observed in 37 operating events identified through the Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) program served as the sample of operating experience. All events reviewed had a conditional core damage probability of 1.0E-5 or greater and indicated the influence of human performance. Reviews also considered Individual Plant Examinations (IPEs) and Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) reports. These reviews were then compared to ROP source materials. The ROP source materials included SECY-99-007/007A, SECY-00-0049, NRC manual chapters and inspection procedures, inspection and supplementary inspection reports, plant issues matrices (PIMs) risk-informed inspection notebooks, and the Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Operator Requalification. Insights regarding the characterization of human performance in the ROP are presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 82-5986.

#### Pendarvis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product
Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



Date: November 10, 2003



| |  | /s/    Fredric N. Eshelman |  |                        
| |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
| |  |                            |  | Fredric N. Eshelman    
| |  |                            |  | Chief Executive Officer
# L_2015334DE.01006501.xml

| 22.12.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 334/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 334/65

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1302/2014 der Kommission vom 18. November 2014 über eine technische Spezifikation für die Interoperabilität des Teilsystems „Fahrzeuge — Lokomotiven und Personenwagen“ des Eisenbahnsystems in der Europäischen Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 356 vom 12. Dezember 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 356 vom 12. Dezember 2014

Seite 281, Anhang, Nummer 4.2.5.3:

Anstatt:

„Fahrgastnotruf“

muss es heißen:

„Fahrgastalarm“.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: November 7, 2007
i

Residential Furnaces and Boilers

Electricity Consumption

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U.S. DOE Workshop on Standards

for Residential Furnaces and Boilers

July 17, 2001

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
Electricity Consumption of

` Residential Furnaces and Boilers

• Currently, only gas/oil consumption is regulated

for gas/oil furnaces and boilers. However,

- electricity consumption is significant

- technologically feasible options exist

• DOE proposes to consider the electricity

consumption in this rulemaking

• Issues

- need an indicator of electricity consumption

- need to consider cooling impacts

1

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
Need an Indicator of Electricity

Consumption

• The indicator can be possibly based on the

Average Annual Auxiliary Electrical Energy

Consumption (EAE)

• Advantages

- covered within existing test procedure

- industry familiarity

• Need to address

- variation with burner capacity

- variation with circulating fan capacity

2

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
Need to Consider Cooling Impacts

• Efficiency gain on circulating fan will also

provide electricity savings during the cooling

season.

- same blower and motor used by air conditioner as

for furnace.

- life cycle cost analysis computes this benefit.

3

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
DOE Requests Input from

Stakeholders

Current standards for residential furnaces and boilers

are based on the AFUE only. What are the potential

benefits and drawbacks of supplementing it with an

electricity consumption indicator in this rulemaking?

The Department is seeking comment on the most

appropriate method to regulate this electricity use.

The Department is seeking comments on the best

approaches to address the cooling-side impacts.

4

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
Backup Slides

5

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
7-71T-77-7"'171- 7

Electricity Consumption

is Significant

Residential Furnaces

• Per household

- Average EAE = 849 kWh/yr

• For nation

- 56 M households w/ furnaces x 849 kWh/yr

- = 47.6 TWh/yr

6

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
Technologically Feasible Options Exist

Residential Furnaces

Technology Efficiency OEM cost Power (W)

(1993)

P S C motor

Forward curved blades

7% -$75 -700W

ECM DC motor

Backward curved blades

30% -$200 -165W

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Efficient and Effective Residential

Air Handling Devices, March 1993

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02II
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Finds Performance 'Acceptable' at Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Latest Review

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: No. III-99-17 April 1, 1999

 

**NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE 'ACCEPTABLE' AT DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION IN LATEST REVIEW**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains acceptable in the NRC's latest plant performance review at the Dresden nuclear power plant, located near Morris, Illinois.

The review covers the period April 1 of last year through January 31.

Geoffrey Grant, NRC Region III Division Director, in a letter to Commonwealth Edison Company, said:

"Overall, performance at Dresden was acceptable...Entering 1999, both units had been operating for extensive periods... Operator performance was good in responding to the several scrams in April through June and during planned power changes. Two significant problem areas which emerged were failures by operators to identify applicable Technical Specification requirements and fundamental errors committed by non-licensed operators. The licensee has taken actions to reverse these trends and recent improvements were noted."

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region III Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Coleman, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[632 NYS2d 907]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable. No particular litany is required to render a waiver voluntary, knowing and intelligent *(People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 283). Although Supreme Court asked defendant only once whether he was waiving his right to appeal, the record reveals that defendant discussed the waiver with his attorney and that the plea bargain was reasonable and beneficial to defendant. The facts and circumstances surrounding the waiver establish that it was voluntary, knowing and intelligent *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11). In any event, were we to reach the issue raised on appeal, we would conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Unauthorized Use Vehicle, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Multidisciplinary Framework for Human Reliability Analysis with an Application to Errors of Commission and Dependency (NUREG/CR-6265, BNL-NUREG-52431)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6265 (PDF – 9 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 1995**Date Published:** August 1995

**Prepared by:** M.T. Barriere, BNL, J. Wreathall, JW&Co., S.E. Cooper, SAlC, D.C. Bley, PLG, W.J. Luckas, Jr., BNL, A. Ramey-Smith, NRC

Contractor Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

Subcontractors John Wreathall and Company Dublin, OH 43017

Science Applications International Corporation Reston, VA 22090

PLG, Incorporated, Newport Beach, CA 92660

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 NRC Job Code L2415

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Since the early 1970s, human reliability analysis (HRA) has been considered to be an integral part of probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs). Nuclear power plant (NPP) events, from Three Mile Island through the mid-1980s, showed the importance of human performance to NPP risk. Recent events demonstrate that human performance continues to be a dominant source of risk. In light of these observations, the current limitations of existing HRA approaches become apparent when the role of humans is examined explicitly in the context of real NPP events. The development of new or improved HRA methodologies to more realistically represent human performance is recognized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a necessary means to increase the utility of PRAs. To accomplish this objective, an Improved HRA Project, sponsored by the NRC's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), was initiated in late February, 1992, at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) to develop an improved method for HRA that more realistically assesses the human contribution to plant risk and can be fully integrated with PRA. This report describes the research efforts including the development of a multidisciplinary HRA framework, the characterization and representation of errors of commission, and an approach for addressing human dependencies. The implications of the research and necessary requirements for further development also are discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kingdom Ventures Inc a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ending July
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Gene Jackson, Principal Accounting Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                 /s/ Gene Jackson
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Gene Jackson
                                                Principal Accounting Officer


August 03, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22284]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, September 11, 2013, 11:30 a.m. EDT

PLACE: Broadcasting Board of Governors, Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of Closed Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of 
Governors.
SUMMARY: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will 
meet in a special session, to be conducted telephonically, to discuss 
and approve a budget submission for Fiscal Year 2015. According to 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Section 22.1, all 
agency budgetary materials and data are considered confidential prior 
to the President submitting a budget to Congress. In accordance with 
section 22.5 of Circular A-11, the BBG has determined that its meeting 
should be closed to public observation pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B). In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act 
and BBG policies, the meeting will be recorded and a transcript of the 
proceedings, subject to the redaction of information protected by 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), will be made available to the public. The 
publicly-releasable transcript will be available for download at 
www.bbg.gov within 21 days of the date of the meeting.
    Information regarding member votes to close the meeting and 
expected attendees can also be found on the Agency's public Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-22284 Filed 9-10-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Lifts Restrictions on Radiological Work at Haddam Neck

----

----

I-98-51

May 5, 1998

**NRC LIFTS RESTRICTIONS ON RADIOLOGICAL WORK AT HADDAM NECK**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has lifted its restrictions on the conduct of radiological work at the Haddam Neck nuclear power plant in Haddam, Conn.

Based on numerous inspections of the radiological controls program, the NRC staff has found that all of the commitments listed in a confirmatory action letter the NRC sent to Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company in March 1997 have been met. In addition, the NRC -- after reviewing the company's performance during the repair of the plant refueling water storage tank and removal of a section of piping --found that the organization can effectively implement its radiation protection program and safely conduct significant radiological work.

Under the terms of the March 1997 confirmatory action letter, the company agreed to conduct only radiological work essential to the safe maintenance of the facility and to implement certain compensatory measures. Because of improvements that had been noted, the NRC staff modified some of those restrictions last November.

A letter sent to the company today removes any remaining restrictions and allows the company to resume performing major radiological work.

NOTE TO EDITORS: copies of the letter are available on the NRC's home page (http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports) or from this office.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021