alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Instrumentation and Controls in Nuclear Power Plants: An Emerging Technologies Update (NUREG/CR-6992)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6992, (PDF - 2.08 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2008**Date Published:** October 2009

**Prepared by:** K. Korsaha, D.E. Holcomba, M.D. Muhlheima, J.A. Mullensa, A. Loebla, M. Bobreka, M.K. Howladera,  S.M. Killougha, M.R. Moorea, P.D. Ewinga, M. Sharpeb, A.A. Shourbajia, S.M. Cetinera, T.L. Wilson, Jr.a, R.A. Kisnera

aOak Ridge National Laboratory 1 Bethel Valley Road Oak Ridge, TN 37831

bUniversity of Tennessee 315 Pasqua Engineering Building Knoxville, TN 37996-2300

K. Nguyen and T. Govan, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report is a summary of advances in eight instrumentation and controls (I&C) technology focus areas that have applications in nuclear power plant digital upgrades as well as in new plants. The review includes I&C architectures for selected Gen III+ plants. This report is the third in a series of planned update reports in a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored emerging technologies study. The first in the series was NUREG/CR-6812,1 and the second was NUREG/CR-6888.2 The study is designed to provide advance information that will enable NRC to be better prepared to make regulatory decisions in these areas.

Compilation of this report generally follows the pattern established in the two previous series reports of reviewing advances in several technology focus areas. However, based on the results of the program review in FY 2006, in which the focus of the study was redirected to include digital I&C in new plants, the focus areas were slightly modified to include I&C architectures in new plants. Thus, the following are the focus areas used for this third NUREG/CR in the series: (1) sensors and measurement systems, (2) communications media and networking, (3) microprocessors and other integrated circuits, (4) computational platforms, (5) surveillance, diagnostics, and prognostics, (6) human-system interactions, (7) high-integrity software, and (8) I&C architectures in new plants. This report documents findings from the study of these focus areas.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1767 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1767

   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discontinue certain 
        administrative cost allowances, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2017

 Mr. Russell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discontinue certain 
        administrative cost allowances, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE COST ALLOWANCES.

    Section 489(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1096(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking the first sentence; and
            (2) by striking ``In addition, an'' and inserting ``An''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed August 3, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00378-CR

____________

EX PARTE TAMARA CHERYL BARLOTTA-WOOD

On Appeal from the 458th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-DCR-083468B

ORDER

Appellant is appealing the denial of her application for a writ of habeas 

corpus. On July 12, 2021, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which did 

not contain a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(a)(2), 34.5(a)(12); see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R. 

App. P. 25.2(d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure instructs the trial court to enter a certificate of the defendant’s 

right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (emphasis added). This includes the entry of an order on 

a defendant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Vazquez, No. 3-
19-00885-CR, 2019 WL 6972681 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 20, 2019, no pet.)

(order).

We order the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal and direct the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the certification with this court within 30 days of the date of this 

order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), 37.1, 44.4; Vazquez, 2019 WL 6972681 at 

*1.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.
ex4_4.htm


Exhibit 4.4



INCREASE IN EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT ADDENDUM


 


This Increase in Equity Line of Credit (the “Increase LOC”) is made as of this 28 day of December 2010 by and between Penny Auction Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Kodiak Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Investor”) with respect to the following facts:


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor have entered into that certain Investment Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “IA”), and that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “RRA” and collectively, with the IA, the “Agreements”).


 


WHEREAS, under the RRA, the Company is required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as soon as practicable, a registration statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”), covering the sale and resale of all of the shares of common stock to be issued to the Investor upon exercise of the “put right” by the Company as described in the IA.


 


WHEREAS, the terms used in this Increase LOC will have the meanings ascribed to them in the IA and RRA unless otherwise defined herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:


 


1.           Increase LOC.


 


The WHEREAS clause on page of the Investment Agreement identifying the initial LOC of $10,000,000 has been amended and restated as follows:


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained herein, the Investor shall invest up to twenty five million dollars ($25,000,000)  to purchase the Company's Common Stock, at no par value per share (the "Common Stock"); and


 


2.           Stock Commitment Fee


 


The stock commitment fee is 4.9 million shares rather than 2% of the outstanding stock of the company.


 


3.           Ownership Limitation


 


The investors 9.9% ownership limit will be calculated based on the company’s outstanding shares calculated on an as converted basis.


 



4.          Effect of Increase LOC.




 


The Agreements will remain in full force and effect except as specifically modified by this Increase LOC.  In the event of any conflict between the Increase LOC and the Agreements, the terms of this Increase LOC will govern.


 




  





-1-











  






 



5.          Counterparts.




 


This Increase LOC may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counterparts will be deemed to be an original and such counterparts will constitute but one and the same instrument.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Increase LOC is executed as of the date first above written.


 



	
PENNY AUCTION SOLUTIONS, INC.

	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
By:

	  	  
	 	
Corey Park, President

	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
KODIAK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC

	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
By:

	  	  
	 	
Ryan Hodson, Managing Director

	  





 


 


 


 


 


-2-
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1760 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to eliminate the authority 

of the Secretary of Agriculture to grant a waiver from the work requirements for participation in the supplemental nutrition assistance program 

on account of an area’s high unemployment rate or limited employment 

availability for individuals who reside in the area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2017 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to eliminate 

the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to grant 

a waiver from the work requirements for participation 

in the supplemental nutrition assistance program on account of an area’s high unemployment rate or limited 

employment availability for individuals who reside in the 

area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1760 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE SUP2 PLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PRO3 GRAM WORK REQUIREMENTS BASED ON UN4 EMPLOYMENT RATE OR JOB AVAILABILITY. 

5 (a) ELIMINATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Section 

6 6(o) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

7 2015(o)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

8 (b) CONFORMING REGULATORY CHANGE.—Not later 

9 than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

10 the Secretary of Agriculture shall implement the amend11 ment made by subsection (a) by revising section 273.24 

12 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, to remove sub13 section (f). 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael T. Fries, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/MICHAEL T. FRIESMichael T. Fries Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
f8k013111ex4vi_bigstring.htm


EXHIBIT 4.6


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Convertible Note (this “Amendment”) is made this 31st day of January, 2011, by and between BigString Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited (the “Holder”), and amends that certain Convertible Note dated June 23, 2009 in the principal amount of $75,000 issued by the Borrower to the Holder (the “Note”).  The Borrower and the Holder are each occasionally referred to herein as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of that certain Agreement and Release of even date herewith by and between the Borrower and the Holder (the “Agreement and Release”) and in exchange for the consideration described therein, the Parties have agreed to amend the Note on the terms set forth in this Amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and other agreements contained in the Agreement and Release, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.           The introductory paragraph of the Note is amended in its entirety as follows:


 


“For value received, BigString Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited (the “Holder”), without demand, the sum of $75,000, with simple and unpaid interest thereon, on June 23, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”), if not paid sooner.”


 


2.           Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.           This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and acknowledged this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


 





	 	
BIGSTRING CORPORATION

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Darin Myman	 
	 	Name:	Darin Myman	 
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 







 



	 	
WHALEHAVEN CAPITAL FUND LIMITED

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Eric Weisblum as attorney-in-fact for Arthur Jones	 
	 	Name:	Arthur Jones	 
	 	Title:	Director
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 786 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-489, K2025-486.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27962 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
No. 91-860.

#### United States Department of Commerce et al. *v.*Montana et al.

Appeal from D. C. Mont. Probable jurisdiction noted. Motion of appellees for expedited briefing schedule and oral argument granted. Opening brief for appellants is to be filed with the Clerk on or before January 15, 1992. Brief for appellees is to be filed with the Clerk on or before February 12, 1992. Reply brief for appellants is to be filed with the Clerk on or before February 21, 1992. Case set for oral argument during the session beginning February 24, 1992.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of AMERALINK,  INC. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin  Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 15, 2004                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Coupling the RELAP Code with External Calculation Programs (Shared Memory Version) (NUREG/IA-0405)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0405 (PDF - 708.18 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2011**Date Published:** October 2011

**Prepared by:** Felix Maciel

Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica Centro Atómico Bariloche San Carlos de Bariloche R8402AGP, Argentina

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A communication library has been developed for the connection of external calculation programs to the RELAP code using shared memory techniques. Modifications to the RELAP program have been introduced in order to implement these facilities.

A portable (non multi-platform) version of the communication library has been achieved, producing a reliable, good performance coupling.

This permits exporting variables from RELAP, operating with them in an external program, and transferring them back to RELAP, working in a synchronized way.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul Molini, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 459]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.), rendered December 14, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

*781Defendant challenges the adequacy of his plea allocution contending that it was not intelligently and knowingly made, and that he did not comprehend the possibility of a fine. Inasmuch as defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate his judgment of conviction, these issues, raised for the first time on this appeal, have not been preserved for appellate review *(see, People v Brandon,*213 AD2d 902; *People v Aloisi,*177 AD2d 491). Moreover, a review of the plea allocution demonstrates that defendant was carefully and fully advised of his rights by County Court, intelligently waived those rights, including the right of appeal, and knowingly pleaded guilty.

Similarly without merit are defendant’s contentions that his attorney was less than effective and that his sentence was excessive. Given the strong case against him and the four prior driving while intoxicated convictions, two as felonies, defendant’s attorney procured an eminently favorable plea bargain, thus limiting defendant’s sentence exposure. Under the circumstances, we are of the opinion that defendant was represented in a competent and meaningful manner *(see, People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146). Moreover, the bargained-for sentence was significantly less than defendant’s maximum exposure, and in light of his past criminal history it clearly cannot be described as excessive. We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian Nichols, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First American Scientific Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Brian Nichols
Brian Nichols
Principal Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------







---