alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
44 F. (2d) 427

#### In re Artie Carlson

(No. 2561)

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,

December 1, 1930

*N. S. Amstutz*for appellant.

*T. A. Hostetler (Howard S. Miller,*of counsel) for the Commissioner of Patents.

[Oral argument November 21, 1930, by Mr. Miller]

Before Graham, presiding judge, and Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, and Lenboot, associate judges

GaRREtt, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellant seeks patent for a design for a toy airplane. The application was rejected by both the examiner and the Board of Appeals on the ground that the claimed design shows nothing patentable over prior art as illustrated in patent to Keely, design *755No. 59898, of December 6, 1921. Appeal was taken from the board’s decision to this court.

Both designs show wheeled toys constructed somewhat in airplane form. The Keely design follows the biplane structure, and shows four wheels; that of appellant represents a monoplane and has three wheels. There are differences of configuration in the bodies of the toys.

We do not, however, find in these differences anything of an inventive nature on the part of appellant. Appellant is not a pioneer in this field of toy designing and the modifications of the Keely structure shown in appellant’s structure do not involve invention. Invention must be present in a design in order to render it patentable.

The authorities sustain the action of the Patent Office tribunals. *White*v. *Converse,*20 F. (2d) 311; 365 O. G. 4; *Elite Mfg. Co.*v. *Ashland Mfg. Co.,*235 Fed. 893, 895; *Chas. Boldt Co.*v. *Nivison-Weiskopf Co.,*194 Fed. 871; *King Ventilating Co.*v. *St. James Ventilating Co.,*26 F. (2d) 357, 359; *Straus Gas Iron Co.*v. *William M. Crane Co.,*235 Fed. 126.

The decision of the Board of Appeals is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lih-Shyng Tsai, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2016



By:

/s/ LIH-SHYNG TSAI


Name:

Lih-Shyng TsaiTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




1
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Human Factors Considerations with Respect to Emerging Technology in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6947)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6947, (PDF 4.80 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2008**Date Published:**October 2008

**Prepared by:**1J.M. O’Hara, J.C. Higgins, W.S. Brown2R. Fink3J. Persensky, P.Lewis, J. Kramer, A. Szabo

1Brookhaven National Laboratory Energy Sciences and Technology Department Upton, NY 11973-5000

2CDF Services, Inc. Fayetteville, AR 72701

3U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

M.A. Boggi, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6529

Availability Notice

## Abstract

 This Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored study has identified human performance research that may be needed to support the review of a licensee’s implementation of new technology in nuclear power plants. To identify the research issues, current industry developments and trends were evaluated in the areas of reactor technology, instrumentation and control technology, human-system integration technology, and human factors engineering (HFE) methods and tools. The issues were organized into seven high-level HFE topic areas: Role of Personnel and Automation, Staffing and Training, Normal Operations Management, Disturbance and Emergency Management, Maintenance and Change Management, Plant Design and Construction, and HFE Methods and Tools. The research issues were then prioritized into four categories using a “Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table” methodology based on evaluations provided by 14 independent subject matter experts. The subject matter experts were knowledgeable in a variety of disciplines. Vendors, utilities, research organizations and regulators all participated. Twenty issues were categorized into the top priority category. This report contains a summary of the high-level topic areas and the issues in each. It also identifies the priority of each issue and the rationale for those in the top priority category. A companion Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) technical report provides additional details on the study methodology, issue analysis, and results. The information gathered in this project can serve as input to the development of a long-term strategy and plan for addressing human performance in these areas through regulatory research. Addressing human performance issues will provide the technical basis from which regulatory review guidance can be developed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation (Committee), 
previously scheduled to be held at the U.S. Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 720, Washington, DC, on January 
26-28, 2015 has been cancelled.
    For more information, please contact Ms. Nancy Copeland, Designated 
Federal Officer at (202) 461-9684 or via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a98689849ec9a48897828b868983a79186c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="054b646b667c2b466a756069646b614573642b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 26, 2015.
Rebecca Schiller,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01694 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: July 31, 2007 /s/ Steven C. Straus   Steven C. Straus   Chief Executive Officer      Date: July 31, 2007 /s/ Alan Buckey   Alan Buckey   Chief Financial Officer   
27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0644 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAITLYN DAWN POLICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 14 2022

11/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0644
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ENRIQUEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 32 3

- C R

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 20110D04189 )

O R D E R

The Court has considered the agreed motion to consolidate, and concludes the motion

should be GRANTED. T he above styled and numbered cause shall be consolidated with cause

number ’ s 08

- 15

- 00322

- CR, 08

- 15

- 00324

- CR, and 08

- 15

- 00325

- CR , Styled Jose Angel Enr iquez

v. The State of Texas, for purposes briefing and oral argument only

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29 th day of June, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez

, and Hughes, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 2015

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Radiological Assessment: A Textbook on Environmental Dose Analyses (NUREG/CR-3332, ORNL-5968)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3332 (PDF – 31.26 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 1983

**Edited by:** John E. Till Radiological Assessments Corporation Neeses, South Carolina

and

H. Robert Meyer Health and Safety Research Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Integration Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 NRC FIN B0766

Availability Notice

## Foreword

It has often been said that we know more about radiation than any other pollutant known to man. We are at this vantage point now because of an early concern for radiation protection when nuclear programs were developing at U.S. Government and university laboratories. Indeed, the protection of man and his environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation came to be known as the field of health physics and benefited from considerable previous experience in medical physics and a vigorous program in radiation biology. To properly appreciate where we are now in our ability to assess radionuclide releases, it is necessary to trace the path of development.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sandrella Lakay Hill a/k/a * From the 441st District

Sandrella Spraglin, Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR39090.

Vs. No. 11-12-00068-CR * March 31, 2014

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error 

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNMSS Procedures

# NMSS State Liaison (SL) Procedures

**Note:** The Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) merged with NMSS on October 5, 2014. All previously issued FSME and Office of State and Tribal Program (STP) procedures are considered effectively NMSS procedures and remain in effect until they are reviewed and reissued. These procedures can be referenced as NMSS procedures even though the procedures still have FSME or STP titles and references.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 11, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Background Procedures
          - State Agreement Procedures
          - State Liaison Procedures
          - Administrative Support Procedures
          - Temporary Instructions
          - Tribal Procedures
          - Management Directives (select)
          - Rescinded Procedures

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 11, 2022
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 13a0032n.06

No. 12-5456

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN PAGAN-APONTE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary of the

Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Before: GUY, SUTTON, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. In this race-based employment discrimination and retaliation action, Edwin

Pagan-Aponte appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant Secretary

of the Army on Pagan-Aponte’s two separate non-selections for promotion. He also appeals the 1

lower court’s order barring expert testimony about the Army’s promotion procedures. Having

determined that the district court thoroughly and correctly set out the undisputed facts and governing

law, this court’s issuance of a full opinion would be duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose.

We AFFIRM the district court’s judgment on the basis of its May 10, 2011 order granting

defendant’s motion to exclude and its April 5, 2012 grant of summary judgment to the Army.

John McHugh became Secretary of the Army after Pagan-Aponte filed his lawsuit. Federal

1

Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) automatically designates Mr. McHugh as the proper defendant.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a) on or before February 27, 2015. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 on or before February 27, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Comments and requests for hearings on applications to import narcotic raw materials are not appropriate. 72 FR 3417 (January 25, 2007).


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on May 15, 2014, Cambrex Charles City, 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:
                    ( print page 4593) Controlled substance
Schedule4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICocaine (9041)
IIOpium, raw (9600)
IIPoppy Straw Concentrate (9670)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances for internal use, and to manufacture bulk intermediates for sale to its customers. Dated: January 21, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01587 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Fire Protection Action Plan: Status Summary Report, Volume 1, No. 1  (NUREG-0298)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0298, Volume 1, No. 1 (PDF - 5.61 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**February 1978

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Foreword

This management report, "Fire Protection Action Plan: Status Summary Report," was established by the Executive Director for Operations, to provide information for monitoring and displaying the progress of NRC activities related to fire prevention and protection.

It utilizes data pertaining to project plans, schedules, and status, which have been integrated into a network-based management information system. As part of this system's initial development, information has been collected and analyzed by the Office of Planning and Analysis from the Offices of Standards Development Inspection and Enforcement, Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Regulatory Research, and International and State Programs.

The purpose of this publication is to provide a vehicle for review of the current status and overall progress of the fire protection action plan from a managerial point of view. Thus, this report is a vehicle for consolidating multiple office plans and programs into a single integrated management plan for the use of office directors in coordinating their activities as well as for an overview for the Executive Director and the Commission.

Several other mechanisms exist for the coordination of fire protection efforts being performed by various NRC offices. Three of them are listed below:
        - A "Coordinating Committee"  with members representing each of the offices involved meets periodically (at least quarterly) to identify and discuss interface problems which are then resolved through normal management channels.
        - A Fire Protection Review Group  with members from the Division of Operating Reactors (DOR) and the Division of Systems Safety (DSS) assures that the fire protection evaluations being performed by various branches of these two divisions are of similar depth and are consistent with NRC requirements. This group also identifies and discusses interface problems and new concerns which may arise. Meetings are as frequent as necessary; issues are resolved through normal management channels.
        - The Electrical Standards and Fire Protection Review Group,  with members representing the Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Research, Inspection and Enforcement, and Standards Development, provides guidance for fire protection research programs to assure that they are designed to meet the needs of the various user offices. The group meets as necessary.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-6-1996
<CASH>                                             99,600
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      31,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        40,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  197,600
<PP&E>                                            632,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                    357,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    579,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             225,200
<BONDS>                                           407,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (105,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      579,800
<SALES>                                           885,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  885,200
<CGS>                                             267,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     800,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   35,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 27,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    23,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                        9,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                13,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       13,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .38
        

</TABLE>