alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1942 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Comptroller General 

of the United States to periodically conduct an audit of the Veterans 

Health Administration budget, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Comptroller General of the United States to periodically conduct an audit of the Veterans Health Administration 

budget, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPTROLLER GENERAL AUDIT OF BUDGET 

4 OF VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 73 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new section: 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1942 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 7330C. COMPTROLLER GENERAL AUDIT OF VHA 

2 BUDGET. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the 

4 United States shall periodically conduct an audit of ele5 ments of the budget of the Veterans Health Administra6 tion, including the budget formulation, execution, alloca7 tion, and use of funds. 

8 ‘‘(b) SELECTION OF ELEMENTS.—(1) In selecting 

9 elements of the budget of the Veterans Health Administra10 tion for purposes of an audit under subsection (a), the 

11 Comptroller General shall take into consideration— 

12 ‘‘(A) knowledge of the programs of the Vet13 erans Health Administration; 

14 ‘‘(B) current issues; 

15 ‘‘(C) national priorities; and 

16 ‘‘(D) priorities expressed by the appropriate 

17 congressional committees. 

18 ‘‘(2) Not later than 30 days before conducting an 

19 audit under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall 

20 submit to the appropriate congressional committees notice 

21 of the elements selected by the Comptroller General for 

22 purposes of the audit. 

23 ‘‘(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.— 

24 In this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional com25 mittees’ means— 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1942 IH

1 ‘‘(1) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the 

2 Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on 

3 the Budget of the Senate; and 

4 ‘‘(2) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the 

5 Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on 

6 the Budget of the House of Representatives.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

9 after the item relating to section 7330B the following new 

10 item: 

‘‘7330C. Comptroller General audit of VHA budget.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
No: 19-033 July 17, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Regulatory Basis 

for Greater-Than-Class C Waste Disposal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a draft regulatory basis 

for potential new regulations governing the near-surface disposal of certain low-level radioactive 

waste.

The NRC classifies low-level radioactive waste based on its potential hazards and has 

specified disposal and waste requirements for three classes of waste with progressively higher 

concentrations of radioactive material. Class A is the least hazardous and Class C the most 

hazardous. However, a fourth type of low-level radioactive waste, called “greater-than-Class-C,” 

contains radionuclides exceeding the concentration limits for Class C. GTCC waste is typically 

activated metals from power reactors, sealed sources, and waste material from medical isotopes, but 

it may also contain special nuclear material such as enriched uranium or plutonium.

Currently, there are no facilities licensed to dispose of GTCC waste, so it is being stored at 

nuclear power plants or at interim storage sites. The draft regulatory basis evaluates whether certain 

GTCC waste could be safely disposed in a near-surface disposal facility. It also evaluates whether 

regulatory changes would need to be considered to permit such action, and whether the NRC or 

certain states should regulate such disposal.

The draft regulatory basis is being made publicly available through the NRC’s ADAMS 

online database under accession number ML19059A403. A notice will be published shortly in the 

Federal Register, which will initiate a 60-day public comment period. Comments may be submitted 

via the federal government’s rulemaking website, www.regulations.gov, using Docket ID NRC2017-0081.

The NRC will hold a public meeting Aug. 27 in Austin, Texas, to present the draft 

regulatory basis and receive public comments. Details on that meeting will be published at a later 

date.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Regarding the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Volume 1 and 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Volume 1, Final Report (PDF - 5.47 MB)
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 52, Volume 2, Appendices (PDF - 38.71 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2015**Date Published:** April 2015

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) has been prepared in response to an application submitted by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) to renew the operating license for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1, (Davis-Besse) for an additional 20 years.

This SEIS includes the analysis that evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action. Alternatives considered include replacement power from a new, natural-gas-fired combined-cycle (NGCC) power plant; combination alternative of NGCC, solar, wind, and compressed air energy storage; a coal-fired power plant; and not renewing the license (the no-action alternative).

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Davis-Besse are not great enough to deny the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers. This recommendation is based on the following:
        - analysis and findings in the generic environmental impact statement,
        - the Environmental Report submitted by FENOC,
        - consultation with Federal, state, Tribal, and local agencies,
        - NRC staff's own independent review,
        - NRC staff's consideration of public comments received during the scoping process, and
        - NRC staff's consideration of public comments received during the draft SEIS comment period.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Exhibit 32.1







SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Mission Community Bancorp (“the Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, I, James W. Lokey, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           This Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  March 31, 2011








By:         /s/ James W. Lokey


James W. Lokey


Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Seismic Design Standards and  Calculational Methods in the United States and Japan (NUREG/CR-7230)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7230 (PDF – 3.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2013**Date Published:** May 2017

**Prepared by:** James J. Johnson1, Aybars Gürpinar1, Robert D. Campbell1, and Annie Kammerer2

1James J. Johnson and Associates2United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Richard Rivera-Lugo and Scott Stovall, NRC Technical Monitors

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Over the years, a number of nuclear power plants (NPPs) in Japan have experienced earthquake shaking and some have experienced shaking in multiple earthquakes. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified a need to better understand the seismic performance of Japanese NPPs and to determine if any important lessons should be applied to NPPs in the United States (U.S.). Meeting that goal requires an understanding of the design criteria used in Japan, and the differences between the practices employed in the two countries.

This report provides information on current and past U.S. and Japanese seismic design standards, calculational methods, and load combinations used for the design of new and currently operating NPPs. This report documents the relative conservatism of the U.S. and Japan seismic analysis, design, and qualification inputs and processes. Both countries generally employ techniques that provide significant margin against the earthquake shaking levels used for design. This report covers various timeframes of interest for both countries.

This report provides information in the areas of seismic hazard assessment, classification categories, soil-structure interaction analyses, structural design, subsystem analysis and design, beyond-design-basis events, and seismic instrumentation. The report provides an assessment of the conservatisms in both the U.S. and Japanese approaches.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Managing PWSCC in Butt Welds by Mitigation and Inspection(NUREG/CR-7187)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7187 (PDF - 10.26 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2014**Date Published:** November 2014

**Prepared by:** E. J. Sullivan and M. T. Anderson

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

W. E. Norris, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Codes V6085/V6411

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Operating experience has shown that Alloy 82/182/600 materials exposed to primary coolant water (or steam) under the normal operating conditions of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) are susceptible to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). These materials were widely used in the original construction of domestic PWR reactor coolant systems (RCS). Cracking typically initiates at the inside surface of these materials when exposed to reactor coolant and in the presence of high tensile residual stresses introduced by welding. The locations in which PWSCC has been identified include partial penetration nozzles, nozzle welds, and piping butt welds. PWSCC increases the probability of a loss-of-coolant accident. This NUREG/CR pertains to managing PWSCC in Alloy 82/182 butt welds.

In response to this degradation mechanism, the nuclear industry and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) undertook a variety of actions. These actions included conducting crack growth rate studies for Alloy 82/182/600 materials, developing augmented inspection programs for varied component configurations, and establishing an improved regulatory environment for addressing PWSCC. In Alloy 82/182 butt welds, the nuclear industry began implementing mitigation strategies for the most susceptible of these welds.

This report provides a summary of the operating experience with PWSCC in Alloy 82/182 butt welds and an overview of industry and regulatory activities to address the safety concern. This report describes the strategies being used to manage potential PWSCC in butt welds, the basic design and regulatory requirements of each strategy/mitigation technique, and an assessment of the issues that may impact the effectiveness of each management strategy. This report also summarizes the NRC regulatory requirements, ASME Code Cases, and the regulatory status of ASME Code Cases related to management of PWSCC in Alloy 82/182 butt welds. A historical summary and timeline of the major events, activities, and decision processes is provided in an appendix.

The effectiveness of the mitigation and inspection strategies being used is evaluated and issues that could affect the reliability of inspections that are required to be performed are also discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit 31.2**
Rule 13a – 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Samuel C. Knoch, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TollgradeCommunications, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2004 /s/ Samuel C. KnochName: Samuel C. KnochTitle: Chief Financial Officer
40
No. 91-6005.

#### Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                       5,621,098
<SECURITIES>                                14,028,996
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,905,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,300,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,493,034
<PP&E>                                       6,473,907
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,068,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,874,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,851,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,176,272
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,500,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,874,542
<SALES>                                     14,025,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,025,024
<CGS>                                        5,919,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,919,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,218,135
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,575,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,643,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Stronghold
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Christopher J. Carey, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   April 14, 2004

                                        /s/ Christopher J. Carey
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Christopher J. Carey
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer*

*     A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has
      been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Melanie S. Meinders, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of Nevada Holding Group, Inc.
(the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"). The undersigned
hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of March 2003.


       /s/  Melanie S. Meinders
----------------------------------------------
Melanie S. Meinders
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Individual Plant Examination: Submittal Guidance  (NUREG-1335)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1335 (PDF - 4.77 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1989 **Date Published:**August 1989 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Based on a Policy Statement on Severe Accidents Regarding Future Designs and Existing Plants, the performance of a plant examination is requested from the licensee of each nuclear power plant. The plant examination looks for vulnerabilities to severe accidents and cost-effective safety improvements that reduce or eliminate the important vulnerabilities. This document delineates the guidance for reporting the results of that plant examination.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter M. Strumph, Chief Executive Officer Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Peter StrumphPeter M. Strumph Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)  Dated: April 23, 2009


THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE REPORT, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SEC AND IS NOT TO BE
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING OF THE COMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (WHETHER MADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE REPORT), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERAL
INCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.