alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1863 

To designate the area between the intersections of Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest and Davis Street, Northwest and Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest 

and Edmunds Street, Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, 

as ‘‘Boris Nemtsov Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2017 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the area between the intersections of Wisconsin 

Avenue, Northwest and Davis Street, Northwest and 

Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest and Edmunds Street, 

Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, as 

‘‘Boris Nemtsov Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BORIS NEMTSOV PLAZA. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The area between the inter6 sections of Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest and Davis 

7 Street, Northwest and Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1863 IH

1 and Edmunds Street, Northwest in Washington, 

2 District of Columbia, shall be known and designated 

3 as ‘‘Boris Nemtsov Plaza’’. 

4 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

5 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

6 the United States to the area referred to in para7 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to Boris 

8 Nemtsov Plaza. 

9 (b) DESIGNATION OF ADDRESS.— 

10 (1) DESIGNATION.—The address of 2650 Wis11 consin Avenue, Northwest, Washington, District of 

12 Columbia, shall be redesignated as 1 Boris Nemtsov 

13 Plaza. 

14 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

15 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

16 the United States to the address referred to in para17 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 1 

18 Boris Nemtsov Plaza. 

19 (c) SIGNS.—The Administrator of General Services 

20 shall construct street signs that shall— 

21 (1) contain the phrase ‘‘Boris Nemtsov Plaza’’; 

22 (2) be similar in design to the signs used by 

23 Washington, District of Columbia, to designate the 

24 location of Metro stations; and 

25 (3) be placed on— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1863 IH

1 (A) the parcel of Federal property that is 

2 closest to 1 Boris Nemtsov Plaza (as redesig3 nated by subsection (b)(1)); and 

4 (B) the street corners of Wisconsin Ave5 nue, Northwest and Davis Street, Northwest 

6 and Wisconsin Avenue, Northwest and 

7 Edmunds Street, Northwest in Washington, 

8 District of Columbia. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-QSB/A

 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 
OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE EXCHANGE ACTFor the transition period from______ to ______

Commission file number 0-27736

 

POINT WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)****
 
**Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of    incorporation or organization)**94-3165263(IRS Employer    Identification No.)**1700 Montgomery Street,    Suite 250    San Francisco, California 94111(Address of principal executive offices)**(415) 394-9467(Issuer’s telephone number)
 

At April 30, 2002, there were 3,352,624 shares of the issuer’s CommonStock outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No[X]

 

 

 

                   This Form 10-QSB/A is being filed for the purpose of correcting errors in the Edgarversion of the consolidated statements of operations contained in the consolidatedfinancial statement included in the Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,2002 of Point West Capital Corporation (the "Original Form 10-QSB").  Thepage number reflected in the 10-QSB/A replaces the same indicated page number included inthe Original Form 10-QSB.  All capitalized terms used in this Form 10-QSB/A and notdefined are used as defined in the Original Form 10-QSB.

 

 

POINT WEST    CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED    STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSFor the Three Months EndedMarch 31,20022001
(unaudited)Revenues:     Interest income$810,177$975,536     Net gain (loss) on    securities5,647(3,407,865)     Other125,378149,363                                         Total revenues941,202(2,282,966)Expenses:     Interest expense760,499823,596     Compensation and    benefits229,754381,126     Other general and    administrative expenses266,663542,648     Amortization--24,150     Depreciation7,5116,024                                Total expenses1,264,4271,777,544                     Loss before income taxes(323,225)(4,060,510)Income tax expense--(18,170)     Net loss$(323,225)$(4,078,680)Loss per share-basic and diluted:$(0.10)$(1.22)Weighted-average    number of shares of common stock     outstanding3,352,6243,352,624Weighted-average number of shares of common    stock     and common stock    equivalents outstanding3,352,6243,352,624
See accompanying    condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
 

 

**SIGNATURES**

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrantcaused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto dulyauthorized.

 

POINT WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION
Dated:    May 22, 2002
/s/ John Ward RotterJohn Ward Rotter
Chief Executive Officer
(Authorized Officer)
Dated:    May 22, 2002
/s/ Joanna L. ZesigerJoanna L. ZesigerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 ********
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1650

# The United States of America National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety: Fourth National Report, September 2007 (NUREG-1650, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1650, Revision 2, September 2007 (PDF - 2.21 MB) 
        - Convention Report, entitled "The Role of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations in Supporting the United States Commercial Nuclear Electric Utility Industry's Focus on Nuclear Safety" (PDF - 8.50 MB)
        - Addendum 3, "Answers to Questions from the Peer Review by Contracting Parties," April 2008 (PDF - 555 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: September 2007**Date Published**: September 2007

**Date Published (Addendum 3):**April 2008

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

> 
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission has Updated NUREG-1650, Rev. 1, "The United States Third National Report for the Convention on Nuclear Safety," issued September 2004, and will submit this report for peer review at the fourth review meeting of the Convention on Nuclear Safety at the International Atomic Energy Agency in April 2008. This report addresses the safety of land-based commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S. It demonstrates how the U.S. Government achieves and maintains a high level of nuclear safety worldwide by enhancing national measures and international cooperation, and by meeting the obligations of all the articles established by the Convention. These articles address the safety of existing nuclear installations, the legislative and regulatory framework, the regulatory body, responsibility of the licensee, priority to safety, financial and human resources, human factors, quality assurance, assessment and verification of safety, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, siting, design and construction, and operation. New to this update is a contribution by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) describing work done by the U.S. nuclear industry to ensure safety. Since the prime responsibility for the safety of a nuclear installation rests with the license holder, it was decided to involve the nuclear industry collectively through INPO, in explaining how the nuclear industry maintains and improves nuclear safety.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Environmental Assessment of Major Revision of 10 CFR Part 71, Final Rule (NUREG/CR-6711)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6711 (PDF 872.86 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2003**Date Published:** 2004

**Prepared by:** D. Hammer, K. Blake

ICF Consulting, Inc. 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031-1207

N. Tanious, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J5236

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the environmental assessment of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC or Commission) rulemaking that modifies 10 CFR Part 71 requirements pertaining to the packaging and transport of radioactive materials, including fissile materials. The rulemaking is intended to: (1) harmonize transportation regulations found in 10 CFR Part 71 with the most recent transportation standards established by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) requirements at 49 CFR; and (2) address the Commission’s goals for risk-informed regulations and eliminating inconsistencies between Part 71 and other parts of 10 CFR. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the potential environmental, health, and safety impacts associated with the regulatory changes as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This report includes: (1) a summary of the findings, (2) a discussion of the regulatory options analyzed, (3) an assessment of the estimated values and impacts identified for each regulatory option, (4) a rationale for the determination of the preferred option, and (5) supplementary information and analyses used in the development of this report. Based on this analysis, none of the 19 potential changes evaluated are expected to result in significant environmental impact.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.15

                 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                            HEART HOSPITAL, IV, L.P.

         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Agreement of Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") of Heart Hospital, IV, L.P. (the
"Partnership") is made and entered pursuant to Section 11.2 of the Partnership
Agreement.

                                    RECITALS

         WHEREAS, the Partners desire to amend the Partnership Agreement in
accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency which is hereby acknowledged, the Partners agree as follows:

         1.       The following provision is hereby inserted as the fourth
paragraph of Section 8.4 of the Partnership Agreement:


                  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event
         that no later than December 31, 2001 MedCath Holdings, Inc. ("MHI") or
         one of MHI's Affiliates conducts an underwritten public offering of the
         common stock of MHI or its Affiliate pursuant to an effective
         registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as then in
         effect, and MHI or MHI's Affiliate offers shares of its common stock or
         cash to any Partner in exchange for such Partner's Partnership Interest
         or a portion thereof (the "Exchange"), MHI and its Affiliates and the
         Partner may, notwithstanding the terms of this Agreement, engage in
         such Exchange upon such terms as the Partner and MHI or MHI's Affiliate
         may mutually agree, and the Exchange shall not be subject to any
         restrictions on the transfer of Partnership Interests or rights of
         first refusal of the Partnership or of any other Partner set forth in
         this Agreement, including, but not limited to, those restrictions set
         forth in this Section 8.4.

         2.       All terms not defined herein shall have the meaning provided
therefor in the Partnership Agreement.

         3.       Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions
of the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         4.       This Amendment shall be effective when approved by the
Partners in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Partnership Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have approved and consented to this
Amendment as of the 30th day of March, 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1962]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15                           ( print page 3552)                        CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones;                

*Whereas,*                     the Cleveland Cuyahoga County Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 40, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-70-2014, docketed 10/1/2014) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to include Lake County, Ohio, as described in the application, adjacent to the Cleveland, Ohio Customs and Border Protection port of entry;                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (79 FR 61050, 10/9/2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize FTZ 40 to expand the service area under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of January 2015.

Paul Piquado,

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01230 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 24.1

UNITEDGLOBALCOM, INC.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Frederick G. Westerman III and/or Valerie L. Cover his or
her attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc.
(the 'Company'), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'Commission'), and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and the documents in
connection therewith, with the Commission; granting unto said attorneys-in-fact full power and authority to perform any other act on behalf of the undersigned required to be done in the premises,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact may lawfully do or cause to be done on behalf of the Company by virtue hereof.

|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/GENE W. SCHNEIDERGene W. Schneider,Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
    and Director
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/ROBERT R. BENNETTRobert R. Bennett,Director                                          
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/ALBERT M. CAROLLOAlbert M. Carollo,Director                                          
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/JOHN P. COLE, JR.John P. Cole, Jr.,Director                                          
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/VALERIE L. COVERValerie L. Cover,Controller                                          
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/MICHAEL T. FRIESMichael T. Fries,President, Chief Operating Officer
    and Director 
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/GARY S. HOWARDGary S. Howard,Director                                                
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/JOHN C. MALONEJohn C. Malone,Director                                                
|               |  |                                                                                         

---

|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/JOHN F. RIORDANJohn F. Riordan,Director                                     
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/CURTIS W. ROCHELLECurtis W. Rochelle,Director                               
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/MARK L. SCHNEIDERMark L. Schneider,Director                                 
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/FREDERICK G. WESTERMAN IIIFrederick G. Westerman III,Chief Financial Officer
|March 27, 2002 |  | /s/TINA M. WILDESTina M. Wildes,Director                                       

---

QuickLinks
No. 82-5991.

#### Klayer *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Husker Ag, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2008.



|    |  |                                                           
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Mike Kinney                                           
|    |  | Mike Kinney, Chairman of the Board, President and Director
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                             
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Robert E. Brummels                                    
|    |  | Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer and Director                
|    |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                             



91
#### Edna Ausderan, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 512]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered on or about June 21, 1994, which *563denied defendant New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A common carrier "is under a duty to provide a prospective passenger with a reasonably safe, direct entrance onto the vehicle, clear of any dangerous obstruction or defect which would impede that entrance” *(Blye v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*124 AD2d 106, 111, *affd*72 NY2d 888). A breach of this duty can depend on whether the carrier did anything to "compel or even suggest” *(supra,*at 114) that the passenger walk across a defective path or whether the passenger "chose her dangerous path without the guidance or discretion of the [carrier]” *(supra,*at 113, *and see,*at 112-114, explaining *MacKenzie v Union Ry. Co.,*82 App Div 124, 128, *affd*178 NY 638). Accepting as true plaintiff’s assertion that she tripped over a protruding metal signpost base in the sidewalk grating after being told by an employee of defendant to board the bus only in the back, an issue of fact exists whether defendant "suggested” a path that required plaintiff to navigate a dangerously defective condition, and even it if did not, whether plaintiff had the choice of a path that was safe and direct.

Plaintiff’s second contention is that the defendant made a special use of the sidewalk where plaintiff tripped and accordingly owed a duty to the public to maintain it in a safe condition *(see, D’Ambrosio v City of New York,*55 NY2d 454, 463). Responsibility for conditions created by a special use is most commonly addressed with respect to abutting property owners, however, special benefit users are not limited to abutting owners. Any entity that installs an object onto the sidewalk or roadway with the permission of the municipality should be deemed a special benefit user (see, *Giaccotto v New York City Tr. Auth.,*150 Misc 2d 164, 168, *revd on other grounds 184*AD2d 355). Here, a clear issue exists whether defendant enjoyed a special use of the sidewalk, since the purpose of the pole that was affixed to the hazardous metal base was to display a sign for a bus route. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.