alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1892 

AN ACT 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the 

flying of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death 

of a first responder in the line of duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1892 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Hometown 

3 Heroes Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF5 STAFF IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF A 

6 FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 

7 DUTY. 

8 (a) AMENDMENT.—The sixth sentence of section 

9 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘possession of the 

11 United States’’ and inserting a comma; 

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘or the death of a first re13 sponder working in any State, territory, or posses14 sion who dies while serving in the line of duty,’’ 

15 after ‘‘while serving on active duty,’’; 

16 (3) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘former officials of 

17 the District of Columbia’’ and inserting a comma; 

18 and 

19 (4) by inserting before the period the following: 

20 ‘‘, and first responders working in the District of 

21 Columbia’’. 

22 (b) FIRST RESPONDER DEFINED.—Such subsection 

23 is further amended— 

24 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, United 

25 States Code; and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 
3 

•HR 1892 EH

1 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(4) the term ‘first responder’ means a ‘public 

6 safety officer’ as defined in section 1204 of the Om7 nibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 

8 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this Act shall apply with respect to deaths of first respond11 ers occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 

12 Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1892 

AN ACT 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide 

duty. of the death of a first responder in the line of for the flying of the flag at half-staff in the event
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Tactical Training Reference Manual (NUREG/CR-5172, BMI-2166)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5172 (PDF – 40.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 1988**Date Published:** April 1989

**Prepared by:** W.D. Telfair, D.A. Moul, J.W. Klingelhoefer, K.M. Jurjevich, W.R. Leonard

Battelle Columbus Division 505 King Avenue Columbus, OH 43201-2693

**Prepared for:** Division of Safeguards and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 NRC FIN D2055

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This Manual provides training information for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensees to assist in implementation of the Tuctical Response Team (TRT) training and exercise requirements of the revised portions of 10 CPR Part 73, which requires that licensees possessing formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material establish TRTs and conduct tactical response exercises to enhance the capabilities of security forces in protecting NRC licensed fuel facilities from potential adversaries postulated in the design basis threat. Step-by-step illustrated instructional material is provided concerning both individual and team tactics and skills appropriate to meeting these requirements. The Manual consists of two parts. Part One addresses adversary attributes and essential tactical skills that each TRT member should master to assure personal safety and effective response to adversary actions. Part Two discusses more advanced tactics, command, control, and orders.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
!
"










 
   
  
   



#

$%&
' 
 
 
 
 !   
!



   
 (   
  )
*

*!




"

'



!



*

+*



!



(

,-(



!



 
 !  + 
 -./.-0. -(-.123 

 , -( 
  
  



7KH +RQRUDEOH :LOOLDP - +D\QHV -U 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW -XGJHIRU WKH 0LGGOH 'LVWULFW RI 7HQQHVVHH VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ45(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

		56-) .07) -8)9999999999999999981,7('07$7(6 2)20(5,&$	$1&<:2-(%0$11		;	2
803

.3)<!=%%%>%?)
< 
3:
2
@24$%%%35@2

$$%%%A@1.--))328< )-.B
:
C2B.03:
99999999999999999  3! 5  5.3.-2, 3.5.3.-0.-/.0 65 .20).- )..00.. 
 )  2  3 - 0
$	

		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
)  2  
  3! 5 5.3.-2, 3.5.3.- 0.-/.0 65 .20).-)..00..
)23 - 0
 2000)2) 8).3 0)2).02))6-.B:
)21.--))
:
3:-


!$480DDE4#&

)
!
-


*
$%














$%2



!
(*

,-


-$$ 
 #$E   E 
&  +

 



-(


!$E	%
-





,-(






40

	>$80$$=#4&


		

	=6





* 

 
    
   
   

 
 
*



+


"

480DE4!







'




   
 
  
 *
  $%   
     +
 
 

  
   -!
 
'










 !-!


!


F

 !A

! 




*


-*




!
2


"
*





(


G

G!

     
     





.
80DE4!






!





'



!)


!



'F

)
'F
!


'


!




'





480DE4

'





6




'


	

		 
 G   
 
 
!   
   #

  (

( (

(&(
(G$%	2     

 



   
    '
 

 !



FG




#





&G$%E5




G

   (( 
 
(

(

!



((G$%E)


	

0

!




:
"
 
 GHI
 "
 

 2 
 


!'



     
  F G   
 4$% 0 $	E $	>> #$%%%&!

!

 
 
 "
     
G(

3
J

5
2'


0*
2  #
 
  !& 
  
*
     
  
   
   '
  !  
(G$	>>#"
>$80$E	&)





 GG  G G



(





!'
$	>		

	






!    
 
 
  
!A



"
0


   
 
 
 
  

5   

 ! 
 !(


!




+






  
 
  
!  
 ,-( 
   
  
 
  
!



 
!    
 
     
  , -  
 

  
   
 ! 
 
)
*

,-(


!




 








-(






F
!
"
)










!





!
!



!



 
 , -( 
  
  

(


,(-


**







,-(

(

 !  
   	 >$ 80 $$=#4&
0






 'F 
 4 80 D $44 ! 





E	

		 !  

 
 
 

 
   
 "
  '

2
!





  

 
 !  
     ! 
 


 

 

  
!
>$80$	$	)




!




!"
!)


! 
    
 
 
  K 
  !

'



'
"
 )
"



 
   
   


!



!

"



 
!2



G

G!!!
"


"

)







  

  
 
 

 
!
(   
   !  0

	
	4$%0$%%#$%%%&
4$%0$	E#$%%%&


)
'F


480D$44!


!






!


F!  
 4>    




!
		

	>
'


$>





)
0



F





'








3
J
5
2
'

 
 0*
 2  )
 
  
 

!
!


G#

!&

*
    
  
  
 
'
!
G 
>$ 80  $E	     
 
     
   
 



G'
       *
 4>

 '
 
G
>$80$EE	
   	 4$% 0 $%% #$%%%&
0
 
   
 
  
GG

(

'


!



A

480 D $E#& 
 
    

 



!

>

 
   
 

  
 

!!



)



'


!


F


G
G
!
 


 

 * 
  
  

  
 





GG

GG
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0995

_____________________________

TIMOTHY L. WALDEN,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary of the

Florida Department of

Corrections,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See 

Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Timothy L. Walden, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
#### In the Matter of Michael J. PIETROCOLA and Nelma A. Pietrocola, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 80-01404A.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Oct. 13, 1981.

Michael J. and Nelma A. Pietrocola, pro se.

Bruce S. Kaufman, Daytona Beach, Fla., for Prestige Development Corp.

ORDER

A. D. KAHN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The creditor, Prestige Development Corporation, objected to the Debtors’ motion to dissolve its judgment lien encumbering certain real property in Volusia County, Florida. The basis of its objection was that the *720property subject to the lien was not the homestead of the Debtors and presumably that the lien could not be avoided pursuant to Section 522(f) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (the “Code”).

This objection is without merit. The homestead exemption law in Georgia provides in part:

> ... any debtor who is a natural person may exempt, pursuant to this Chapter, for purposes of bankruptcy, the following property:

> (1) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $5,000 in value, in real property or personal property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, .. . and (6) *The debtor's aggregate interest,*not to exceed $400.00 in value *plus any unused amount of the exemption provided under paragraph (1) of this subsection, in any*property; .... (emphasis added)

*Ga.Gode Ann.*§ 51-1301.1 (Supp.1981).

The Debtors’ schedules show that they claimed as exempt personalty valued at $1,000.00, and $6,000.00 in equity in the Florida real estate. Under Georgia law the Debtors are entitled to exempt $10,000 in value in any property. *Ga.Code Ann.*§ 51-1301.1(6) (Supp.1981). The debtors may exempt up to $10,000 of their equity in the Florida realty. Because Prestige’s judicial lien, which resulted from its final judgment of $2,072.87 against the Debtors, impairs the Debtors’ exemption in the Florida property, the Debtors may avoid the lien. 11 U.S.C. § 522(f).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the objection of Prestige Development Company to the Debtors’ exemption and their motion to dissolve levy be, and the same is, OVERRULED; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Prestige’s judicial lien be, and the same is, hereby AVOIDED, and Prestige Development Corporation shall take those steps necessary to effectuate this Order.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4312-4313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-510 and 731-TA-1245 (Final)]


Calcium Hypochlorite From China

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigations, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) 
(``the Act''), that an industry in the United States is materially 
injured by reason of imports of calcium hypochlorite from China, 
provided for in subheadings 2828.10.00, 3808.94.50, or 3808.99.95 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been 
found by the Department of Commerce to be sold in the United States at 
less than fair value (``LTFV''), and to be subsidized by the 
government(s) of China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these investigations effective December 
18, 2013, following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and 
Commerce by Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Lonza Company, Atlanta, GA. The 
final phase of the investigations was

[[Page 4313]]

scheduled by the Commission following notification of preliminary 
determinations by Commerce that imports of calcium hypochlorite from 
China were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and dumped within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of 
the Commission's investigations and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
August 29, 2014 (79 FR 51605). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, 
on November 25, 2014, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these 
investigations on January 21, 2015. The views of the Commission are 
contained in USITC Publication 4515 (January 2015), entitled Calcium 
Hypochlorite from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-510 and 731-TA-1245 
(Final).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 21, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-01378 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### DANIEL G. FOWLE v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH. DANIEL G. FOWLE v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH.

In the absence of fraud or collusion, the price agreed upon by the parties to a contract must he presumed to he fair.

tForthe other points decided, see the case of *Tuekerv., (Kty of Raleigh,*next preceding.)

Ciyil Action, tried before Watts, J., at January Term., 1876, of Wake Superior Court.

The points raised by this case were decided in the case of *W. H.*& *R. S. TucJcer*v. *1 he Oity of Raleigh, ante.*

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

*Busbee &*Busbee, for the appellant.

*Haywood, Fowle*and *Snow,*contra.

Reade, J.

All the points in this case are covered by the case of *Tucker*v. *City of Raleigh,*at this term, except that in *274this case the defendant denies that the price of the services rendered was reasonable.

In the absence' of fraud or collusion, the price agreed on by the parties must be taken to be fair.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, Envirocare to Hold Open Meeting at the Conclusion of Facility Inspection

----

----

RIV: 97-07

January 27, 1997

NRC, ENVIROCARE TO HOLD OPEN MEETING

AT THE CONCLUSION OF FACILITY INSPECTION

**Media and interested citizens invited to attend.**

Officials of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Envirocare of Utah, Inc. will hold an open public meeting Thursday, January 30 at which they will discuss the results of a routine inspection of the facility conducted by the NRC. Members of the press and the public are invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available afterwards to answer questions. The NRC typically opens such meetings when officials anticipate public interest.

The meeting will begin at 4 p.m. at Envirocare's low-level waste disposal facility near Clive, Utah.

The inspection being conducted January 27-30 is part of the NRC's routine, periodic inspection program. The inspection is a follow up to a November 1996 inspection and is concerned with ensuring that the facility is operating in compliance with NRC regulations and Envirocare's NRC license.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6087
KEVIN TRACY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NURSE MURPHY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-745-R) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Tracy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Tracy, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Tracy v. Murphy , No. CA-98-745-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 4. 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No: I-19-004 March 19, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss

2018 Performance of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of the 

Pilgrim nuclear power plant, operated by Entergy Nuclear, during a public meeting on March 26 in 

Plymouth, Mass. 

The meeting, to be held in the Regency Ballroom at the Hotel 1620 Plymouth Harbor,

180 Water Street, will begin at 6 p.m. NRC staff responsible for plant inspections, including the 

resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss its performance.

Pilgrim was in Column 4 (repetitive degraded cornerstone) of the NRC’s Action Matrix and, 

therefore, was under heightened oversight from 2015 through 2018. In a March 4, 2019, letter 

documenting the NRC’s overall assessment of Pilgrim’s performance, the staff noted that the plant 

has demonstrated sustained improvement throughout 2018, and that Entergy had addressed all of 

the issues that led to its placement in Column 4. These actions allowed the NRC to move the plant 

to Column 1, or a normal level of oversight.

The change was based on detailed inspections performed by the NRC from the fourth 

quarter of 2017 through the final quarter of 2018, as well as routine daily inspections. The 

inspections that led the agency to conclude areas in need of attention were addressed, which led to 

sustained safety performance improvement at the plant. In addition, at the end of the year, all 

inspection findings and performance indicators were of very low safety significance. As a result, 

Pilgrim is under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of 

inspection each year.

The annual assessment letter for Pilgrim, as well as the meeting notice, are available on the 

NRC website. Current performance information is also available.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Eric J. Sandman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2006

| |  |                          
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | /s/ Eric J.
  Sandman    
| |  |                          
| |  | Eric J.
  Sandman        
| |  | Chief
  Financial Officer

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Mitigative Techniques for Ground-Water Contamination Associated With Severe Nuclear Accidents (NUREG/CR-4251/PNL-5461)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
45 F. (2d) 915

#### Skookum Packers Association *v.*Pacific Northwest Canning Co.

(No. 2523)

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,

December 19, 1930

*Eugene E. Stevens (Edward D. Jones*and *Albert L. Jacobs*by counsel) for appellant.

*George 0. Shoemaker*and *Harry F. Riley*for appellee.

[Oral argument November 14, 1930, by Mr. Stevens and Mr. Riley]

Before Graham, Presiding Judge, and Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, and Lenroot, -Associate Judges

Lenroot, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding. The Commissioner of Patents held that appellant was estopped to oppose *798the registration sought by appellee, and reversed the decision of the-examiner of trade-mark interferences, which sustained the- notice of' opposition and adjudged that appellee was not entitled to the registration sought by its application. From this decision of the commissioner appellant takes this appeal.

The issues involved herein are substantially the same as those-involved in the case between the same parties, Patent Appeal No. 2522, decided this day, 18 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 792, and by stipulation of the parties the record in said last-named case became the-record in the case at bar.

For the reasons given in our decision in said Patent Appeal No.. 2522, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is *reversed.*