alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum to the Docket

From: Ross Elliott, U.S. EPA, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Subject: Personal Communication with Doug McCurrey , Vice President Marketing and

Business Development, Kinder Morgan Date: 14 June 2011
On 21 July, 2010, Kathryn Caballero of U.S. EPA’s Office of Civil Enforcement spoke with Mr. Doug McCurrey , Vice

- President for Marketing and Business Development , Kinder Morgan CO 2 Development Company. Ms. Caballero asked Mr. McCurrey how Kinder Morgan tests their CO 2 pipelines to ensure that no undesirable contaminants are added or transported. Mr. McCurrey

responded that they

take a supercritical sample from the pipeline, gasify it, and run it through the gas chromatograph t o identify organic impurities. He also s tated that Kinder Morgan's greatest concerns are for CO 2 water content, which they monitor closely . They

are also concerned about inert materials in the CO2 supply stream, not only because they

reduce the effectiveness of CO 2 transport, but because they t end to take up needed space

.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CAROLYN GOODEN, * No. 12-596V

Petitioner, * Special Master Moran

*

v. * Filed: July 29, 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

Respondent. * respondent does not object.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lawrence R. Cohan, Esq., Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for 

Petitioner;

Melonie J. McCall, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On July 28, 2014, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, on July 22, 

2014, petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs seeking an award 

of $44,328.88. In informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain 

items of petitioner’s application. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner 

amended her application to request $42,000.00, an amount to which respondent 

does not object. The Court awards this amount.

On September 13, 2012, Carolyn Gooden filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which she received on 

February 24, 2010, caused her to suffer chronic inflammatory demyelinating 

polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Petitioner received compensation based upon the 

parties’ stipulation. Decision, filed June 16, 2014. Because petitioner received 

compensation, she is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(e). 

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Petitioner seeks a total of $42,000.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for her 

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states 

that she incurred no out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. 

Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $42,000.00 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Lawrence R. Cohan, for attorneys’ 

fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, John A. Kennedy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pacifica Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 17, 2005 

 

/s/ John A. Kennedy 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert M.
Dennerlein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Date: May 7, 2004

                                              /s/  Robert M. Dennerlein
                                              -------------------------
                                              Robert M. Dennerlein
                                              Chief Financial Officer



                                       26
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

*Conference proceeding prepared by either the NRC staff or a contractor. Other Conference Proceedings may be available in ADAMS.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 30, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 30, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 763 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-455, K2025-452.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27921 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ANDREW P. GLUSHKO,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 501 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
No. 82-5999.

#### Scarborough *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
November 24, 2014

Mr. Matthew Gerlitzki

P.O. Box 61

Muldraugh, KY 40155

Dear Mr. Gerlitzki:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 121.436 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your November 10, 2014, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA2014-0945), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send 

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michelle Ferritto

Acting Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# L_2015110EN.01001301.xml

| 29.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 110/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 110/13

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/665

of 21 April 2015

on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUMAM RCA) (EUMAM RCA/2/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/78 of 19 January 2015 on a European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUMAM RCA) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/78, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/78, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following a recommendation on the contribution offers of the Republic of Moldova ('Moldova') and Georgia by the EU Mission Commander of EUMAM RCA and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, those offers should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following a recommendation on the contribution offers of the Republic of Moldova ('Moldova') and Georgia by the EU Mission Commander of EUMAM RCA and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, those offers should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution offers of Moldova and Georgia to the European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUMAM RCA) are accepted and are considered to be significant.

2.   Moldova and Georgia are exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUMAM RCA.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 13, 20.1.2015, p. 8.

1

---
No: I-19-010 April 18, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns Two New Resident Inspectors to Salem Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Justin 

Hawkins as the new senior resident inspector and Matthew Hardgrove as resident inspector at the 

Salem nuclear plant in Hancocks Bridge, N.J. The two units are operated by PSEG Nuclear.

Hawkins was the senior resident inspector at the adjacent Hope Creek 

nuclear plant prior to accepting the position at Salem. He joined the agency in 

2007 as a reactor engineer in Region I. He also has worked as a resident inspector 

at the Limerick plant in Pennsylvania. Hawkins joined the NRC after serving in 

the United States Navy aboard fast-attack submarines for six years. He earned a 

bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the United States Naval Academy and 

a master’s in nuclear engineering business management at Old Dominion 

University.

Hardgrove joined the agency at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md., in 

2012, and is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development 

Program. Most recently, Hardgrove was a project engineer based in Region I. He 

holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in nuclear engineering from Penn State 

University.

Each operating U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two 

NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, 

conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting with plant 

workers and the public. Inspectors can serve for up to seven years at any one site.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

      In connection with the report on Form 10-K/A of Janel World Trade, Ltd.
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the registrant certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

Dated: November 23, 2005                     /s/ James N. Jannello
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             James N. Jannello, Executive Vice
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer

Dated: November 23, 2005                     /s/Stephan P. Cesarski
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             President and Chief
                                             Operating Officer

Dated: November 23, 2005                     /s/Linda Bieler
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Controller and Chief Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes of
complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: April 25, 2014



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Overview of Nuclear Data Uncertainty in Scale and Application to Light Water Reactor Uncertainty Analysis (NUREG/CR-7249, ORNL/TM-2017/706)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7249 (PDF – 5.77 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2017**Date Published:** December 2018

**Prepared by:** W. Wieselquist M. Williams D. Wiarda M. Pigni U. Mertyurek

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Bethel Valley Road Oak Ridge, TN 37831

Mourad Aissa, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the current state of the art in SCALE for nuclear data uncertainty analysis capability, and it provides an overview of the uncertainty in multigroup cross sections, fission product yields, and decay data. The effect of nuclear data uncertainty is demonstrated for a typical light water reactor (LWR) depletion analysis problem involving a Combustion Engineering 14 × 14 assembly irradiated in Calvert Cliffs Unit 1. A single fuel rod from assembly D047, designated as MKP109, has been subjected to destructive radiochemical assay to measure the isotopic contents.

The 95% range width (difference between the 97.5th and 2.5th percentiles) is used in this study to assess the calculation uncertainty. This approach uses the actual distribution of the data and does not make any assumptions about the normality of the distributions. If the distribution were normal, then the 95% range width would correspond to 4-sigma range, or +/- 2 sigma. 

The calculation uncertainty determined in nuclide concentrations for the MKP109 rod ranges from a few percent to 50%. The power factor for this fuel rod shows a very low uncertainty of less than 0.5%. 

Uncertainties in the macroscopic cross sections, reactivity, and power distributions are generally low, in the few percent range. The effective delayed neutron fraction, *βeƒƒ*, shows higher uncertainty of 20–100%.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021