alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME  STATEMENT  OF  OMNIPOINT  CORPORATION  AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS  ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         198,370
<SECURITIES>                                   44,112
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (46)
<INVENTORY>                                    33,728
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,717
<PP&E>                                         273,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,547)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,434,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,265
<BONDS>                                        477,606 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       513
<OTHER-SE>                                     82,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,434,272
<SALES>                                        3,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,587
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               46,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (52,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (52,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.02)
                                                      


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Historical Case Analysis of Uranium Plume Attenuation (NUREG/CR-6705)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6705 (PDF - 2.79 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2001**Date Published:** February 2001

**Prepared by:** C.F. Jove Colon, P.V. Brady, M.D. Siegel, E.R. Lindgren

Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-0750

E. O'Donnell, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Regulatory Applications and Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6811

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Groundwater plumes containing dissolved uranium at levels above natural background exist adjacent to uranium ore bodies at uranium mines, milling locations, and at a number of explosive test facilities. Public health concerns require that some assessment of the potential for further plume movement in the future be made. Reaction-transport models, which might conceivably be used to predict plume movement, require extensive data inputs that are often uncertain. Many of the site-specific inputs are physical parameters that can vary spatially and with time. Limitations in data availability and accuracy mean that reaction-transport predictions can rarely provide more than order-of-magnitude bounding estimates of contaminant movement in the subsurface. A more direct means for establishing the limits of contaminant transport is to examine actual plumes to determine if, collectively, they spread and attenuate in a reasonably consistent and characteristic fashion. Here a number of U plumes from ore bodies and contaminated sites were critically examined to identify characteristics of U plume movement.

The magnitude of the original contaminant source, the geologic setting, and the hydrologic regime were rarely similar from site to site. Plumes also spanned a vast range of ages and no complete set of time-series plume analyses exist for a particular site. Despite the accumulated uncertainties and variabilities, the plume data set gave a clear and reasonably consistent picture of U plume behavior. Specifically, uranium plumes:
        - Appear to reach steady-state, that is, they quit spreading rapidly (within a few years).
        - Exceed roughly 2 km in length only in special cases e.g. where in situ leaching has been carried out. The majority is much smaller.
        - Exhibit very similar U chemistry between sites. This implies analogous contaminant attenuation mechanisms despite their location.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LO UIS EUGENE PAYTON , Appel lant ,
v. Cas e No. 5D 23 -4 4 LT Cas e No s

. 16 -2 017 -C F -6 923 -A XX X

16 -2 017 -C F -6 922 -A XXX

STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 27, 2023 3. 850 Appeal from t he Circuit Court for Duval County , Lester Bass, Ju dge. Louis E ugene Payton, Liv e Oak, p r o se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristie Regan , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. P ER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

WALLIS , KILBANE and MACIV ER , JJ., concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Public Involvement in the Nuclear Regulatory Process (NUREG/BR-0215, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0215, Revision 2 (PDF - 951 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**October 2004

Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

## Introduction

Public involvement in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's activities is a cornerstone of strong, fair regulation of the nuclear industry. The NRC recognizes the public's interest in the proper regulation of nuclear activities and provides opportunities for citizens to make their opinions known. The NRC seeks to elicit public involvement early in the regulatory process so that safety concerns that may affect a community can be resolved in a timely and practical manner. This process is considered vital to assuring the public that the NRC is making sound, balanced decisions about nuclear safety.

This booklet briefly describes various ways you can learn about and participate in the NRC's regulatory process. Anyone may provide comments or voice concerns at critical junctures in the development of safety rules, including decisions about (1) where to locate and whether to license a nuclear facility, (2) ongoing issues about a facility's operation or termination, and (3) a facility's impact on the environment.

Notices of opportunities for involvement are published in the *Federal Register*, and sometimes on the Internet. The *Federal Register* is a daily publication announcing rules, policies, and other important actions of the Federal Government. Copies are available at many local libraries, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) in Rockville, Maryland, and on the internet. For major actions, the NRC issues press releases, which reach the public through local newspaper articles, mailings, and the Internet.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0995

_____________________________
T IMOTHY L. W ALDEN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

J ULIE L. J ONES , S ecretary o f t he F lorida D epartment of C orrections
, Respondent

.

______________ _______________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

May 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is d ismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

W ETHERELL , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_

____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Timothy L. Walden, pro se
, Petitioner

. No appearance for Respondent

.
# C_2011219EN.01001402.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — V v Commission

(Case T-510/09) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Recruitment - Refusal of appointment on grounds of failure to meet physical fitness requirements necessary for the performance of the functions - Duty on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)

2011/C 219/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: V (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curral and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission ECR II-0000 seeking the annulment of that judgment.

V

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission to the extent that the Civil Service Tribunal omitted to rule on a plea in law raised by Ms V at the hearing, alleging that the president of the medical committee was not enrolled in the Belgian Medical Association; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission to the extent that the Civil Service Tribunal omitted to rule on a plea in law raised by Ms V at the hearing, alleging that the president of the medical committee was not enrolled in the Belgian Medical Association;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

| 3. | Dismisses the action brought by Ms V before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-33/08; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action brought by Ms V before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-33/08;

| 4. | Orders Ms V to bear her own costs and those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance. Further orders the costs incurred at first instance, in the case which gave rise to the judgment in V v Commission, to be borne in accordance with the ruling given in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the operative part thereof. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ms V to bear her own costs and those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance. Further orders the costs incurred at first instance, in the case which gave rise to the judgment in V v Commission, to be borne in accordance with the ruling given in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the operative part thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.20



|     |  |                                                                |  |                                       
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 115 Sansome Street, Suite #310 San Francisco, California 94104 |  | (415) 415-7880 Tel. (415) 875-7075 Fax

10 March 2009

Jane Moffitt

460 Nimitz Avenue

Redwood City, CA
94061



|Re: | Amendment to Offer Letter
|--- | -------------------------

Dear Jane:

Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) is pleased to offer an amendment to your current terms of employment as set forth in that offer letter
dated April 25, 2008, as amended to date (the Existing Offer Letter). Effective upon your agreement with the terms of this letter, the paragraph in the Existing Offer Letter beginning with For purposes of this letter, a
Change in Control shall mean . . . shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

For purposes of this
letter, a Change in Control shall mean a transaction or series of transactions (other than an offering of the Companys stock to the general public through a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
whereby any person or related group of persons (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) (other than the Company, any
of its subsidiaries, an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or any of its subsidiaries or a person that, prior to such transaction, directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the
Company) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of securities of the Company possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the Companys securities
outstanding immediately after such acquisition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no transaction shall be considered a Change of Control for the purposes of this letter: (A) if the stockholders existing prior to such transaction(s) hold in the
aggregate more than fifty percent (50%) of the securities or assets of the surviving or resulting company; or (B) in connection with a private placement of equity securities of the Company in connection with a financing of the
Companys on-going operations.

While the Existing Offer Letter with be amended and restated as set forth above, the remainder of your
Existing Offer Letter shall otherwise remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Please indicate your agreement with these terms by signing and dating the enclosed duplicated original of this letter agreement and returning it to me.



Sincerely,Nile Therapeutics, Inc.By:

/s/ Peter StrumphPeter StrumphChief Executive Officer


I have read and accept this amendment to my Existing Offer Letter:



|                    |  |  |  |                 
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------
|Date: 10 March 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Jane Moffitt



Page 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann 
|                   |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann     
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
No: 19-048 September 30, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

Vermont Becomes 39th NRC Agreement State

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Kristine L. Svinicki and Vermont Gov. Philip B. 

Scott have signed an agreement to give Vermont regulatory authority over certain radioactive materials 

in the state. Vermont is the 39th state to sign such an agreement with the NRC.

Under the agreement, effective today, Vermont assumes responsibility for licensing, 

rulemaking, inspection and enforcement activities related to the industrial, medical and academic uses 

of radioactive material. The NRC is transferring 36 academic, commercial and medical licenses for 

radioactive material to Vermont’s jurisdiction.

NRC retains jurisdiction over the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, which is currently 

decommissioning, as well as federal agencies using certain nuclear material in the state. 

Before entering into the agreement, the NRC determined that Vermont’s radiation control 

program is adequate to protect public health and safety and is compatible with the NRC’s regulations. 

The proposed agreement was published in the Federal Register for four consecutive weeks for public 

comment.

More information about the Agreement State program, including a list of Agreement States, is 

available on the NRC’s website.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Large-Scale VibrationTests of Main Steam and Feedwater Piping Systems With Conventional andEnergy-Absorbing Supports (NUREG/CR-6559, BNL-NUREG-52532)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6559 (PDF - 36.82 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 1998**Date Published:** August 1998

**Prepared by:** Y. J. Park, G. DeGrassi, P. Bezler, and C. H. Hofmayer

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

Upton, NY 11973-5000

NRC Job Code W6081

**Prepared for**: Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As part of collaborative efforts between the United States and Japan, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) and Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) participated in the Seismic Proving Test program of main steam and feedwater systems (MS) conducted by the Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation (NUPEC) for the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) of Japan. Scaled models of main steam piping for a typical PWR plant and feedwater piping for a BWR plant were fabricated by NUPEC and subjected to a large number of earthquake motions at NUPEC's Tadotsu Engineering Laboratory. Initially, the piping systems were supported by conventional snubbers and subjected to design level earthquakes as well as excitations beyond the design level. Then the snubbers were replaced by energy absorbing devices, and tests at various excitation levels up to the deformation limits of the energy absorbers were performed. This report describes the evaluation of the test results and BNL's post-test analyses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# C_2015375EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 November 2015

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2015

(2015/C 375/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 was adopted on 10 November 2015.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2015.

For the Council

The President

P. GRAMEGNA

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 69, 13.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
# L_2015057EN.01001801.xml

| 28.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 57/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 57/18

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 1367/2014 of 15 December 2014 fixing for 2015 and 2016 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 366 of 20 December 2014
  )

On page 10, Annex, Part 2, Species: Roundnose grenadier and roughhead grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris and Macrourus berglax, Zone: Union and international waters of Vb, VI and VII (RNG/5B67-) for roundnose grenadier; (3) (RHG/5B67-) for roughhead grenadier, footnote 1:

Coryphaenoides rupestris

Macrourus berglax

3

for:

| ‘(1) | A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV (RNG/*8X14-).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

read:

| ‘(1) | A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV (RNG/*8X14- for roundnose grenadier; RHG/*8X14- for roughhead grenadier).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

on page 10, Annex, Part 2, Species: Roundnose grenadier and roughhead grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris and Macrourus berglax, Zone: Union and international waters of VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV (RNG/8X14-) for roundnose (2) grenadier; (RHG/8X14-) for roughhead grenadier, footnote 1:

Coryphaenoides rupestris

Macrourus berglax

2

for:

| ‘(1) | A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of Vb, VI, VII (RNG/*5B67-).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

read:

| ‘(1) | A maximum of 10 % of each quota may be fished in Union and international waters of Vb, VI, VII (RNG/*5B67- for roundnose grenadier; RHG/*5B67- for roughhead grenadier).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-03-2015]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Diane Finver at                         *Diane.Finver@trade.gov*                         or (202) 482-1367.                    

Dated: January 22, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01700 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P