alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0137

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID WARREN LAMBERT,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 9, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0137
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInterim Staff Guidance

# Interim Staff Guidance Associated with Nuclear Security

Additional guidance is being issued in the following document(s) to:  1) provide updated information on topics addressed in existing guidance, or 2) clarify or address topics not discussed in existing guidance; for use by NRC staff, licensees, and applicants.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, September 21, 2020
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20037

NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Successor Indenture Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-94-CV-882) January 5, 1998

Before WISDOM, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
We have reviewed t he briefs and the record. We have heard the arguments of counsel regarding this appeal. The district court committed no reversible error. The judgment is
AFFIRMED.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

January 28, 2016

ERRATUM

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2015-1415

MORTGAGE GRADER, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FIRST CHOICE LOAN SERVICES INC., NYLX, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees 

Decided: January 20, 2016

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

On page 1, replace the sentence 

Decided: January 20, 2015

with the following sentence:

Decided: January 20, 2016
ex101.htm


LOAN AGREEMENT







This Loan Agreement ("Agreement") is dated March 26, 2008








	
BETWEEN:

	
Green Shoe Inc. (the "Lender")


















	
AND:

	
Sunberta Resources Inc. (the "Borrower")












1.           Promise to Pay







Borrower promises to pay to Lender the sum of US$50,000, and interest and other charges stated below (altogether, the "Loan").







2.           Breakdown of Loan







Amount of Loan:                 US$50,000








	
Annual Rate:

	
10% annual interest compounded monthly on the last day of each month, with interest accruing from April 1, 2008.












3.           Repayment







Borrower will repay the amount of the Loan upon demand.







4.           Prepayment







Borrower has the right to repay the whole outstanding amount at any time.







5.           Collection fees







If this note is placed with an attorney for collection, then Borrower agree to pay an attorney's fee of 20% of the unpaid balance. This fee will be added to the unpaid balance of the loan.


 



	
LENDER

	
BORROWER


	
GREEN SHOE INC. 

	
SUNBERTA RESOURCES INC.


	  	  
	
(signed)

	
(signed)


	  	  
	
Authorized Signature

	
Authorized Signature














  





-1-
#### Davis, Appellant, vs. Davis, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Olin & Btitler*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Hall, Baker & Hall*of Madison.

*By the Court.*—

Order affirmed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                                                              May 20, 1998


                           FOURTEEN HILL CAPITAL, L.P.
                           ---------------------------
                       ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER FINANCINGS
                       ----------------------------------


SAN  FRANCISCO-(May 20, 1998)  Fourteen  Hill Capital,  L.P., a majority  owned

affiliate of Point West Capital  Corporation  (which  trades on NASDAQ under the

symbol PWCC) today announced  that,  during the first quarter of 1998, it closed

four financings in the aggregate amount of $3,445,000.


Fourteen Hill provided a $795,000  working  capital loan for the benefit of KIWI

International  Holdings, Inc. KIWI International Holdings is the holding company

for KIWI  International Air Lines, which operates primarily on the east coast of

the United States.


Fourteen  Hill  received  a  redemption  notice for  warrants  it owned in First

Priority  Group,  Inc.,  and exercised such warrants by pruchasing an additional

$1,000,000 of the common stock of First Priority Group.  First Priority Group is

engaged in automotive fleet management and  administration of automotive repairs

for  businesses,  insurance  companies  and  members of affinity  groups.  First

Priority Group trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol FPGP.


Fourteen Hill purchaed $750,000 of 5% convertible preferred stock of AMNEX, Inc.

AMNEX,   Inc.  is  a  fully   integrated   pay  phone  and   operator   services

telecommunications company. AMNEX trades on NASDAQ under the symbol AMXI.



<PAGE>


Fourteen Hill purchased $900,000 of 7% convertible  preferred stock of WorldPort

Communications,  Inc.  WorldPort is an  international  facilities-based  carrier

seeking   to   become   a   leading   worldwide    provider   of   international

telecommunications  services.  WorldPort  trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under

the symbol WRDP.


Fourteen  Hill is  licensed  by the  Small  Business  Administration  as a small

business investment company.  Fourteen Hill provides capital to small businesses

(generally  businesses  whose tangible net worth does not exceed $18 million and

whose average net  income  during  the  preceding  two  years did not  exceed $6

million) whose primary businesses are located in the United States.


Commenting  on the  financings,  Alan  Perper,  President  of Fourteen Hill 

Capital ,  said,  "We  are  very  pleased  with  these  transactions, and are

continuing to seek financing opportunities in telecom,  e-commerce,  and related

businesses."


(KEYWORD CALIFORNIA AND INDUSTRY KEYWORD: Venture Capital).

CONTACTS:  FOURTEEN HILL CAPITAL, SAN FRANCISCO.
                  CHRIS RODSKOG, 415/394-9467
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Handbook of Parameter Estimation for Probabilistic Risk Assessment (NUREG/CR-6823,  SAND2003-3348P)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6823 (PDF - 20.5 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2002**Date Published:**September 2003

**Prepared by:** Corwin L. Atwood1, Jeffrey L. LaChance2, Harry F. Martz3, Dennis J. Anderson2, Max Englehardt4, Donnie Whitehead2, Tim Wheeler2

1Statwood Consulting Silver Spring, Maryland 20910

2Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0748

3Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

4Formerly with Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory  Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415

Arthur D. Salomon, NRC Technical Monitor

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC Job Code W6970

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is a mature technology that can provide a quantitative assessment of the risk from accidents in nuclear power plants. It involves the development of models that delineate the response of systems and operators to accident-initiating events. Additional models are generated to identify the component failure modes required to cause the accident-mitigating systems to fail. Each component failure mode is represented as an individual "basic event" in the systems models. Estimates of risk are obtained by propagating the uncertainty distributions for each of the parameters through the PRA models.

The data analysis portion of a nuclear power plant PRA provides estimates of the parameters used to determine the frequencies and probabilities of the various events modeled in a PRA. This handbook provides guidance on sources of information and methods for estimating the parameters used in PRA models and for quantifying the uncertainties in the estimates. This includes determination of both plant-specific and generic estimates for initiating event frequencies, component failure rates and unavailabilities, and equipment non-recovery probabilities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2007

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1959 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1959

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
            for employer-provided dependent care assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

    Ms. Sinema (for herself and Ms. Herrera Beutler) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
            for employer-provided dependent care assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child and Dependent Care FSA 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED DEPENDENT CARE 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 129(a)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$5,000 ($2,500'' and inserting 
``$7,500 (half such dollar amount''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 129(a)(2) of such Code is 
amended by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and by 
inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2016, 
                the $7,500 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be 
                increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins, 
                        determined by substituting `calendar year 2015' 
                        for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                Any increase determined under the preceding sentence 
                shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,218
<SECURITIES>                                       105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,588)
<INVENTORY>                                    109,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               324,779
<PP&E>                                          49,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           681
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   400,154
<SALES>                                        116,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,151
<CGS>                                           55,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   692
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (789)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
Form 10-KSB/A
Ogden Golf Co. Corporation
File No. 333-105075



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
the Ogden Golf Co. Corporation (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

I, Robert R. Petersen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

          1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ogden
Golf Co. Corporation.


Dated: September 14, 2007            By: /s/ Robert R. Petersen
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                              Robert R. Petersen
                                              Principal Financial Officer
#### Beers, Respondent, vs. Atlas Assurance Company, Ltd., and others, Appellants.

*October 11*

November *5, 1935.*

*473For the appellants there was a brief by *Wolfe & Hart,*attorneys for all appellants except the Western Fire Insurance Company, and *Bender, Trump & McIntyre,*attorneys for the Western Fire Insurance Company, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Herbert 0. Wolfe.*

*William G. Wheeler*of Janesville, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The court held upon the first appeal that the complaint did not state a cause of action for fraud, but that a cause of action for breach of contract could be spelled out of the complaint. Without in any way disaffirm-ing the contract, the plaintiff, by his amended complaint, again seeks to recover damages for the alleged fraud. So considered the case is ruled by the decision on the former appeal and for the reasons there stated. All the allegations, however much characterization may accompany them, come down merely to the proposition that the plaintiff was induced to enter into a contract which was fraudulent, because the defendants, at the time the contract was made, did not intend to perform it. That was the identical question dealt with on the former appeal, and for the reason therein stated we adhere to the prior decision. Despite the fact that neither the trial court nor the plaintiff concurs in the views of this court, the former decision is the law of this case.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant
S. Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2004


By:    /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
       ----------------------
Name:  Shant S. Hovnanian
Title: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       19
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

August 30, 2010

Dave Brown

Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.

19794 Riverside Avenue

Redding , CA 9 6049

- 6028

Re: Sierra Pacific Industries

– Loyalton (SPI

- Loyalton) PSD Permit Revision

Dear Mr. Brown :

In accordance with provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401

et seq.), the Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the application submitted by

SPI

- Loyalton t o revise its existing PSD permit for operation of a 20 megawatt

cogeneration facility in Sierra County , California . The proposed revision consists of

increasing NO X and CO emissions limits for its biomass

- fueled boiler

.

A request for public comment reg arding EPA's proposed action on the above

application was published on March 19 , 2010. EPA received several comments on this

proposed action. After consideration of the pertinent f ederal statutes and regulations, the

EPA hereby issues a modified PSD perm it for the facility described above. This

amendment to the PSD permit shall take effect immediately upon receipt by Sierra

Pacific Industries, Inc.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Manny Aquitania

of our Permits Office at (415) 972

- 3 977

.

Sincerely,

original signed by Elizabeth Adams for

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

Enclosure

cc: Jim Turner, SPI

Gretchen Bennitt

, NSAQMD

Mike Tollstrup, CARB
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Evaluation of Aging and Environmental Qualification Practices for Power Cables Used in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6794)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6794 (PDF - 4.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 2002**Date Published:**January 2003

**Prepared by:** M. Villaran, R. Lofaro

**Contributors:** E. Grove, P. Soo

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

S. K. Aggarwal, NRC Program Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6822

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An aging assessment of safety-related power cables used in commercial nuclear power plants has been performed to determine the effects of aging degradation. This study is based on the review and analysis of past operating experience, as reported in the Licensee Event Report, Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and Equipment Information and Performance Exchange databases. In addition, documents prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that identify significant issues or concerns related to power cables have been reviewed. Based on the results of the aforementioned reviews, predominant aging characteristics are identified and potential condition monitoring techniques are evaluated. The results of the aging assessment were then used to evaluate environmental qualification practices for power cables to determine if all significant aging mechanisms are appropriately addressed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021