alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.3 RELEASE Pre & Postprocessor (NUREG/IA-0433)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0433 (PDF - 1.92 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2013**Date Published:** December 2013

**Prepared by:** Dr. W. Tietsch

Westinghouse Electric Germany GmbH Dudenstrasse 44 68167 Mannheim Germany

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Since the introduction of the 32-Bit Windows Operating System technology for Personal Computers with INTEL CPU architecture Relap has been migrated from mainframe computers and UNIX workstations to the desktop personal computers. Due to the general structure of Relap the user interface however did not change in the course of this migration. Relap running on PCs still is command line driven and does not take advantage of the benefits of the windows environments. Inputs to the program and outputs have the same structure as the UNIX or mainframe versions. Therefore the classic way of performing analyses with Relap which consist of several, mostly iterative and consecutive steps did not change with PC installations of the program.

Westinghouse Reaktor mid of the 90th developed several tools running on the PC to support the analysts retrieving and documenting results of Relap analyses. Based on these tools and using the power of the object oriented technology and third party functionality for the graphics generation a Graphical Users Interface has been developed by Westinghouse Reaktor which integrates all steps of a typical Relap analysis process. This Pre & Postprocessor has been designed to run in all known Windows environments (Windows95/98, ME, NT4, 2000 and XP). It has the feel and look of typical Windows software and an intuitive users interface which only requires a minimum of training. The actual version 3.3.0 of the Pre & Postprocessor cooperates with the Intel Relap5Mod3.3Release version

The present report describes the general features of the Pre & Postprocessor, the installation, the typical analysis process including restarts and strip cases and the data retrieval and visualization process. Additionally the Restart Postprocessor, which is a FORTRAN program with command line control, which is used by the Pre & Postprocessor running in the background is described and a source code listing of this program is added.

The Pre & Postprocessor currently is used at Westinghouse Reaktor GmbH as a standard tool and has proven to support the Relap analysis process and to enhance the efficiency of the analysts.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Hall, Special Administratrix, Respondent, vs. McDonald, Appellant.

*November 10*

December *6, 1938.*

*473
      *C. L. Baldzvin*of La Crosse and *D. M. Perry*of Black River Falls, for the appellant.

*E. S. Jedney*and *Ralph S. Lund,*both of Black River Falls, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

McDonald’s employee was engaged in securing wood from a wood lot outside the city of Black River Falls. On the way he invited Richard Halverson, a fourteen-year-old boy, to accompany him. When the employee asked Halverson if he would like to drive, the boy replied that he did not know how to shift gears in a truck. Nevertheless the employee and the boy exchanged places and Richard drove. When he saw the Hall car approaching, he lost control of the *474truck and it turned across the road directly in front of Hall, whose car struck the right side of the truck. The road was thirty feet wide, and the circumstances disclosed by the record clearly indicate that the accident occurred because the truck was in the hands of an incompetent driver.

The fact that McDonald’s employee in charge of the truck was not authorized to permit another to drive does not relieve McDonald from liability for the negligence of his own driver in permitting an incompetent person tO' take the wheel. Restatement, Agency, § 241. The increased risk of harm to others from such a procedure is plain. The employee was under a duty tO' supervise and control the truck, and the liability of the owner does not depend upon whether the substitute driver became an agent of the owner.

If the authorized driver places at the wheel an incompetent substitute, the employer is not less liable than he would be if the driver left the car on an incline without sufficiently applying the brakes. *Grant v. Knepper*(1927), 245 N. Y. 158, 156 N. E. 650. Nor is the employer relieved from liability because the employee had no legitimate reason for making the substitution. The act of an employee may be within the scope of his employment although done in part tO' serve the purposes of the servant or of a third person. *Le Sage v. Le Sage*(1937), 224 Wis. 57, 271 N. W. 369; *Thomas v. Lockwood Oil Co.*(1921) 174 Wis. 486, 182 N. W. 841.

As to the question raised by the motion to^ review, we are of the opinion that the amount allowed for pain and suffering, while not large, is within reason, and that there does not exist a sufficient cause for changing that answer. The order dismissing the cross complaint of McDonald against the county is not seriously challenged on this appeal. It appears that the ruling of the trial court, based upon an absence of any showing of a defect in the highway, was correct.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Americans with Disabilities Act: A Guide for People with Disabilities Seeking Employment (NUREG/BR-0462)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0462 (PDF - 326.34 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**September 2009 

 Office of Small Business and Civil Rights U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

There are more opportunities now than ever before for people who are receiving SSDI and SSI benefits to learn job skills and find permanent employment. If you are seeking a job or are new to the workforce, you should become familiar with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), a Federal civil rights law designed to prevent discrimination and enable individuals with disabilities to participate fully in all aspects of society. One fundamental principle of the ADA is that individuals with disabilities who want to work and are qualified to work must have an equal opportunity to work. Toward that end, this brochure answers the following questions about employment rights under the ADA:
        - How do I know if I am protected by the ADA?
        - What are my rights under the ADA?
        - What is a "reasonable accommodation"?
        - What should I do if I think I might need a reasonable accommodation?
        - How do I request a reasonable accommodation?
        - What happens after I make a request for a reasonable accommodation?
        - What should I do if I think my ADA rights have been violated?
        - Is there any cost to file a charge?
        - Do I need a lawyer to file a charge?
        - What happens after I file a charge with the EEOC?

For related information, see Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination Complaint Process. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 of
CABLE NET, INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
-------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CFO
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1993

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 759 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-450, K2025-447.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27917 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Eighth Army Chaplain Directorate celebrates 110 years of religious affairs specialist MOS

By Kenji Thuloweit8th Army

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More  News
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Darren Bloom, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Darren Bloom
-----------------------------
Darren Bloom
Chief Financial Officer
January 20, 2006

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TX Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TX Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00946

- CR

GERRON BENARD SIMMONS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13CR0784

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute a
controlled substance

. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief i n which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim.2

App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 81 3 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was provided to him. On July 5, 2016 , appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s response, and ag ree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim
raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Wise. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of A M Marketing,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: March 15, 2005                                  Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Order filed July 30, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00506

- CV

____________ MICHAEL REEVES , Appellant

V.
CENTRAL HOUSTON NISS AN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 55206



### O R D E R The reporter’s record has not been filed. The court reporter notified this court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and is not appealing as indigent.

When he filed his original petition in the trial court, appellant also filed a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. “A party who files a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). “Costs” includes fees charged by the court reporter for preparation of the appellate2

record. Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(c). No contest to appellant’s statement appears in the clerk’s record, and we hav e not received an order requiring appellant to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. Appellant is therefore permitted to proceed without payment of costs in the trial

court. Accordingly, the official court reporter for the 113th District Court is ordered
to file the reporter’s record by August 30, 2019

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 23.2**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-75378and No. 333-132175 of our report dated January 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated  statements ofincome, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cashflows  of Calavo Growers, Inc. for the year endedOctober 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule as listed inItem 15 of this Form10-K for  the year ended October 31, 2005, which report appears inthe October 31, 2007, annual report on Form 10-K of Calavo Growers, Inc.        /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP      Los Angeles, California
No. 82-5979.

#### Crabtree *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.