alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP,Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Forms S-8 Nos. 333-104307 and 333-64932) pertaining to the Amended and Restated1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1999 DirectorOption Plan, the VEO Systems, Inc. Option Plan, the CommerceBid.com, Inc. 1999Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Mergent Systems, Inc. Stock Option Plan, the1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, theAppnet Systems, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Appnet Systems,Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Internet Outfitters, Inc. 1996 IncentiveStock Option Plan, the Appnet e-Business Technology and Integration, Inc.Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Exterprise, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan and theRegistration Statements (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-108144 and 333-114183) of CommerceOne, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 27, 2003,with respect to the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements and scheduleof Commerce One, Inc included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the yearended December 31, 2003.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP            

Walnut Creek, California
#### Robert C. Burnett, petitioner for writ of habeas corpus, *vs.*A. S. Barrett.

Cumberland County.

Decided December 13, 1911.

(No record received by the reporter.) The rescript says : "The entries made in this case at the law court held in Portland on the 4th Tuesday of June, 1911 were as follows :

"Case and plaintiff’s brief in. 30 days for respondent to file brief. 15 days for plaintiff’s reply or petition dismissed. As no brief has been filed by the respondent, and the time in which his brief and the reply were to have been filed, having long since elapsed, the entry must be, dismissed for want of prosecution.”
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4554-4555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 2618-020-ME; 2660-024-ME]


Woodland Pulp LLC; Notice of Availability of Final Environmental 
Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the applications for new licenses for 
the West Branch Project (FERC Project No. 2618) and the Forest City 
Project (FERC Project No. 2660). The West Branch Project is located on 
the West Branch of the St. Croix River in Penobscot, Washington, and 
Hancock Counties, Maine. The Forest City Project is located on the East 
Branch of the St. Croix River in Washington and Aroostook Counties, 
Maine.
    Staff prepared a multi-project final environmental assessment (EA), 
which

[[Page 4555]]

analyzes the potential environmental effects of licensing the projects, 
and concludes that licensing the projects, with appropriate 
environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major federal 
action that would significantly affect the quality of the human 
environment.
    A copy of the final EA is on file with the Commission and is 
available for public inspection. The final EA may also be viewed on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits, in the 
docket number field, to access documents. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3f5f6e1f0fcdddfdaddd6e0c6c3c3dcc1c7f3d5d6c1d09dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-
3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659. You may also register online at 
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via 
email of new filings and issuances related to these or other pending 
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    For further information, contact Amy Chang at (202) 502-8250 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef8e8296c18c878e8188af898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ffef2e6b1fcf7fef1f8dff9faedfcb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01496 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Capabilities and Practices of Offsite Response Organizations for Protective Actions in the Intermediate Phase of a Radiological Emergency Response (NUREG/CR-7248)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7248 (PDF – 1.34 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2017**Date Published:** June 2018

**Prepared by:** T. Park D. Hoell M. Denneny

The Cadmus Group LLC 1776 Eye Street NW, 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006

Todd Smith, NRC Technical Monitor Sergio Gonzalez and Lindsey Cooke, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the results of a study conducted to better understand the capabilities and practices of offsite response organizations (OROs) for protective actions in the intermediate phase of a radiological emergency response. The research consisted of:
        - Interviews with state OROs regarding protective action decisions (PADs) and capabilities.
        - Review of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) after action reports (AARs) from the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program ingestion pathway exercises.
        - Review of a sample of state radiological emergency response plans.

Nine states voluntarily participated in the interview process, including at least one state from eight of the nine FEMA regions with nuclear power plants. State practices were largely consistent in several areas, including using Federal guidelines and scientific procedures to inform protective action decision-making; working within and across various levels of government to develop and implement PADs; and utilizing resources from the Federal Government or mutual aid sources as needed.

The review of AARs yielded 35 with relevant information from 25 states. This review, combined with the review of 23 state radiological emergency response plans from 21 states, augmented the interview results. Results from the interviews and the documentary reviews may be used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to inform modeling assumptions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Software Reliability and Safety in Nuclear Reactor Protection Systems (NUREG/CR–6101, UCRL–ID–114839)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6101 (PDF - 630.93 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 11, 1993

**Prepared by:** J. Dennis Lawrence

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Planning the development, use and regulation of computer systems in nuclear reactor protection systems in such a way as to enhance reliability and safety is a complex issue. This report is one of a series of reports from the Computer Safety and Reliability Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, that investigates different aspects of computer software in reactor protection systems. There are two central themes in the report. First, software considerations cannot be fully understood in isolation from computer hardware and application considerations. Second, the process of engineering reliability and safety into a computer system requires activities to be carried out throughout the software life cycle. The report discusses the many activities that can be carried out during the software life cycle to improve the safety and reliability of the resulting product. The viewpoint is primarily that of the assessor, or auditor.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15



August 14, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:       Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

     1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290, Registration No. 333-83007 and
Registration No. 333-65502) 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and
Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and Employees Prior to the
Adoption of the Plan

     2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907 and Registration No. 333-55470)
1998 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 14, 2001, on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three- month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and included
in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to above.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-19-1998
<CASH>                                          53,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,100
<INVENTORY>                                     42,100 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,100
<PP&E>                                         707,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 415,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,300
<BONDS>                                        407,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537,600
<SALES>                                        599,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               599,900
<CGS>                                          177,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Atom Probe Tomography Characterization of the Solute Distributions in a Neutron-Irradiated and Annealed Pressure Vessel Steel Weld (NUREG/CR-6629)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6629 (PDF - 1.78 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 1999**Date Published:** November 2000

**Prepared by:** M. K. Miller, K. F. Russell, R. E. Stoller, P. Pareige*

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Co. Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6151

*Groupe de Métallurgie Physique, UMR-6634 CNRS Faculté des Sciences de l ́ Université de Rouen 76821 Mont Saint AIGNAN, France

C. J. Fairbanks, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6953

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A combined atom probe tomography and atom probe field ion microscopy study has been performed on a submerged arc weld irradiated to high fluence in the Heavy-Section Steel Irradiation (HSSI) fifth irradiation series (Weld 73W). The composition of this weld is Fe -0.27 at. % Cu, 1.58% Mn, 0.57% Ni, 0.34% Mo, 0.27% Cr, 0.58% Si, 0.003% V, 0.45% C, 0.009% P, and 0.009% S. The material was examined after five conditions: after a typical stress relief treatment of 40 h at 607°C, after neutron irradiation to a fluence of 2 x 1023 n m-2 (E > 1 MeV), and after irradiation and isothermal anneals of 0.5, 1, and 168 h at 454°C. This report describes the matrix composition and the size, composition, and number density of the ultrafine copper-enriched precipitates that formed under neutron irradiation and the change in these parameters with post-irradiation annealing treatments.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
North Highlands Bog Marsh Report 2005

– Part 3

Remember, these are just some of the places to see wetlands. Virtuall y every state park in Minnesota has at least some kind of wetland to experience. From floodplain forests along river bottoms to the Lake Su

perior shoreline to streams and waterfalls to the compelling story of groundwater in M ys tery

Cave, each park has a unique story to tell y ou about the value of wetlands.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of CABLE NET INC. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Marasco,
President of the Company and Maria Marasco, Secretary, Treasurer of the Company
, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 25,
2008





/s/ Maria
      Marasco
            
            
            /s/ Frank
      MarascoName:
      Maria Marasco
              Title:
      Secretary Treasurer
            
            
            Name:
      Frank Marasco
              Title:
      President
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

s0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141286

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141286 COA: 287895 Saginaw CC: 07-030108-FH JAMES STEPHAN ZIMMERMANN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
February 7, 2014

MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0694, Finding of Failure to Submit State Implementation Plans 

Required for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

SUBJECT: Status of Attainment State Implementation Plans (SIPS) for the 2008 Lead National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards Due on June 30, 2012 

FROM: Mia South, Air Quality Policy Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, State and 

Local Programs Group, Lead Manager

A total of 16 areas were designated nonattainment for the 2008 lead national ambient air quality 

standard, effective December 31, 2010. Attainment SIPs for these areas were due June 30, 2012, and 

EPA is taking final action finding a failure to submit attainment SIPs for three areas in Pennsylvania. This 

memorandum explains the basis for EPA’s decision not to issue a finding of failure to submit for the 

remaining 13 areas that were designated nonattainment in 2010. 

Two of the areas received clean data determinations (CDDs) which, as described in more detail in the 

notices published in the Federal Register, suspend certain planning requirements, including the 

requirement to submit an attainment demonstration. The two lead nonattainment areas with CDDs are 

Bristol in Sullivan County, TN (77 FR 52232, August 29, 2012) and Bellefontaine in Logan County, OH (78 

FR 66280, November 5, 2013).

1

EPA determined that attainment SIP submissions for two lead nonattainment areas were complete. One 

determination is for Granite City in Madison County, Illinois, by letter dated January 22, 2014. The other 

determination is for Herculaneum in Jefferson County, Missouri, by letter dated July 8, 2013. 

The remaining nine areas designated nonattainment for lead in 2010 submitted attainment SIPs that 

were deemed complete by operation of law (six months after the SIP was submitted). See CAA section 

110(k)(1)(B). The dates on which the SIPs were submitted, as well as the dates on which they were 

deemed complete, are presented in the chart below.

 1

 A clean data determination does not suspend the requirement to submit an emissions inventory. EPA 

has approved the emissions inventory submitted for Bristol, TN (79 FR 1593, Jan. 9, 2014), and has 

determined the emissions inventory submitted for Bellefontaine, OH is complete, by letter dated Feb. 6, 

2014.
EPA 

Region Area Name State Designation 

Date

SIP 

Element 

Deadline

SIP 

Submission 

Date

SIP Completeness

Date

4 Tampa FL 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/29/2012 12/29/2012

4 Troy AL 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 11/9/2012 5/9/2013

5 Cleveland OH 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/25/2012 12/25/2012

5 Delta OH 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/25/2012 12/25/2012

5 Eagan MN 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/11/2012 12/11/2012

5 Muncie IN 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 3/14/2013 9/14/2013

6 Frisco TX 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 10/17/2012 4/17/2013

7 Iron, Dent, and 

Reynolds Counties

MO 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 4/18/2013 10/18/13

9 Los Angeles CountySouth Coast Air BasinCA 12/31/2010 6/30/2012 6/20/2012 12/20/2012
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Predictive Bias and Sensitivity in NRC Fuel Performance Codes (NUREG/CR-7001)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7001 (PDF - 1.34 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2009**Date Published:** October 2009

**Prepared by:** K.J. Geelhood, W.G. Luscher, C.E. Beyer, D.J. Senor, and M.E. Cunningham, D.D. Lanning, H.E. Adkins

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

 NRC Job Code N6326

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The latest versions of the fuel performance codes, FRAPCON-3 and FRAPTRAN were examined to ensure best estimate behavior of the codes and to ensure (to the extent possible that unintentional bias has been eliminated. Each individual model and type of code prediction was examined and compared to the data that was used to develop the model. In addition, a brief literature search was performed to determine if more recent data have become available since the original model development for model comparison. If new data were discovered, these data were compared to the models and code predictions in FRAPCON-3.3 and FRAPTRAN-1.3 in order to determine if the model is biased. Models or integral effect prediction found to be biased relative to the data were updated and corrected in the upcoming versions of the codes, FRAPCON-3.4 and FRAPTRAN 1.4. Areas where modeling may be lacking were noted for further model development. The details of the updated models are provided in this report. 

Subsequently, a sensitivity study was performed on the steady-state code, FRAPCON-3.3 to determine the effects of uncertainty in model predictions, manufacturing parameters and power history on the code outputs of regulatory interest.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# > w

# 2%$) ll-EE

- ^r^33)ll-E-19 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM

Sheet 233 of 264 

# iP. 2

OC T 1 6 '9 8 09:0 1 NORTH " END ' COMPOSITE S riv,- » Ki r « c P. 1 Ig l 00 2 

# T~ e- 

# • 19 3 Contac t Repor t From : Date : Contact : Company : Shaw n McKee , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Octobe r 12,199 8 Mr . Jonatha

n Spaulding Nort h En d Composites , Inc . 

## r

•-» * AII'i'OCT T Telephon e Number : (207 ) 594-882 1 Fa x Number : (207 ) 594-104 9 Contac t Summary : Mr . Jonatha

n Spaulding wa s contacted t o clarif y astatemen

t made at th e Soptembe

r 11 , 199 8 Smal l Busines s Ope

n Molding Outreac

h Meeting fo

r the Reinforce d Plastic s MAC T Standar d regardin g th e recommendation o f ge l coat s made b y Coo

k Composite s an d Polymer s (CCP) . I n respons e t o m

y question s Mr . Spaulding indicate d th e following : Mr . Spaulding indicate d tha t h e mean t hi s statemen

t meeting indicatin g tha

t ge l coa l supplier s ar

e not actively encouraging customers to switch t o th e newer , lo w HA P ge l coats . Nort h End Composites , Inc . use s RPawr-Associate s a s it s supplie r fo r CC P ge l coats . KP^af Associate s ha s no t

discourage d Nort

h En d Composites . Inc . fro

mpurchasin g an d usin g CC P gel coat s containin g lowe

r amounts o f

monomers tha

t ar e hazardou s air

pollutant s (HAP) . RP-_e d Associate s ha s als o no t

actively encouraged Nort

h End Composites , Inc . t o purchas e an d us e a lowe r HAP ge l coat . Mr . Spaulding adde d tha

t Nort h En d Composites, . Inc . woul d no t b e oppose d t o tryin g a lo w HA P ge l coat , bu t

they ar e hesitan t to d o s o withou

t seeing th e result s o f

trad e studie s showing tha

t th e lo w HA

P ge l coat s hav e simila

r propertie s t o th e higher

HA P gel cwats . 

# i$ [ 

# %£ 4o

h. WoeJ /

*7 \ oxr c or\ 

# W CfQVMJC

-Tl< £ <,£ > 

# J

INFORMATION I S ACCURAT E