alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF ERIC C. WAREHAM FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

### APR 06 2021
Bovveri Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Stet.. nf Mnrlana ORDER

Eric C.Wareham has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuantto Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The BarAdmissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Wareham has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Eric C. Wareham may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this day ofApril,2021. 04/06/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005

# ~

~-~A Jtistices
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                   |                                    |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                              |                              |                               |
| DATE:                November 14, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Marius                Silvasan |
|                                   | Marius                Silvasan         |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
#### Estate of Cawker: First Wisconsin Trust Company, Executor, Appellant, vs. Estate of Cawker, Respondent.

*January 18*

February *13, 1940.*

*651For the appellant there was a brief by *Bender, Trump & McIntyre,*attorneys, and *Kneeland A. Godfrey*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Godfrey.*

*H. K. Curtis*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

Claimant filed claims for amounts due upon notes which were liabilities of the Cawker estate. Filing of these claims was the virtual equivalent of commencing an ordinary action upon the notes, and such actions may be *652prosecuted independently of the foreclosure of the security. While the matter of deficiency might have been litigated in the foreclosure proceedings in the circuit court, it was not necessary to do so. The claimant could seek first foreclosure of the mortgages only, leaving recovery of the balances due upon the notes to the proceedings which have been initiated by the filing of the claims in the county court. *White Eagle Building & Loan Asso. v.*Freyer, 231 Wis. 563, 286 N. W. 32; *Cavadini v. Larson,*211 Wis. 200, 248 N. W. 209.

The objections to the allowance of the claims in the county court involved the contentions: (a) That evidence was not produced which shows that the fair value of the mortgaged premises was obtained upon the foreclosure sale, and (b) that the Koeffler estate has lost its rights to insist upon the recovery of a deficiency against the Cawker estate at least as to one of the notes by reason of the failure to make a representative of the mortgagor a party to the foreclosure action, or to serve upon him notice of its application for confirmation of the sheriff’s sale. These objections are without force in this case. As to the foreclosure action in which the mortgagor was made a party, it is clear that the latter is conclusively bound by the finding of the circuit court in the foreclosure proceeding that a fair price was realized upon the foreclosure sale. But the contentions have no merit apart from this. This proceeding does not constitute a direct attack upon the foreclosure judgments which have been entered, and questions as to defects of parties in those proceedings or the propriety of notice to mortgagors who are not parties, is wholly immaterial here. The claims being equivalent to actions upon the promissory notes secured by the mortgage, production of the notes created a *prima facie*case of liability, and the burden of establishing payment of the notes, whether in whole or in part, rested throughout upon the representatives of the Cawker estate.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to allow the claims.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jeffrey A. Pontius, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  

4.

The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 21, 2006
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Glade M. Knight, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 22, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT                                                                          
|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                              
|                     |  |  |  | Glade M. Knight Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer Apple Hospitality Two, Inc.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1868 

To provide that providers of broadband Internet access service shall be subject 

to the privacy rules adopted by the Federal Communications Commission 

on October 27, 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2017 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. PALLONE, and Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide that providers of broadband Internet access service shall be subject to the privacy rules adopted by the 

Federal Communications Commission on October 27, 

2016. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring American 

5 Privacy Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1868 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTING THE PRIVACY OF BROADBAND CUS2 TOMERS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a pro4 vider of broadband Internet access service (as defined in 

5 section 8.2 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) shall 

6 be subject to— 

7 (1) the Report and Order in the matter of pro8 tecting the privacy of customers of broadband and 

9 other telecommunications services that was adopted 

10 by the Federal Communications Commission on Oc11 tober 27, 2016 (FCC 16–148); and 

12 (2) the rules adopted in such Report and Order. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 21.1



List of Subsidiaries



|                                   |  |                                              
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Entity:                            |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                   | 
|Instinet Group, Incorporated       |  | Delaware                                     
|Instinet, LLC                      |  | Delaware                                     
|Lynch, Jones and Ryan, Inc.        |  | Delaware                                     
|Inet ATS, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                                     
|Instinet Clearing Services, Inc.   |  | Delaware                                     
|Instinet International Corporation |  | Delaware                                     
|Instinet Group, LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|Instinet Europe Limited            |  | United Kingdom                               
|Instinet Global Services Limited   |  | United Kingdom
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2015-1-16) Docket DOT-OST-2014-0114.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not deny the application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail to Aerodynamics Incorporated, and revoke its certificates to conduct interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than February 5, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0114 and addressed to the Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Catherine O'Toole, Air Carrier Fitness Division, (X-56, Office W86-469), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

Dated: January 16, 2015.

Brandon M. Belford,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2015-01656 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsState-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project (NUREG/CR-7110)

# State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project Volume 2: Surry Integrated Analysis (NUREG/CR-7110, Volume 2, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7110, Volume 2, Revision 1 (PDF - 23.36 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2012**Date Published:** August 2013

**Prepared by:** Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy

NRC Job Code N6306

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The evaluation of accident phenomena and the offsite consequences of severe reactor accidents has been the subject of considerable research by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) over the last several decades. As a consequence of this research focus, analyses of severe accidents at nuclear power reactors are more detailed, integrated, and realistic than at any time in the past. A desire to leverage this capability to address conservative aspects of previous reactor accident analysis efforts was a major motivating factor in the genesis of the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) project. By applying modern analysis tools and techniques, the SOARCA project developed a body of knowledge regarding the realistic outcomes of severe nuclear reactor accidents. To accomplish this objective, the SOARCA project used integrated modeling of accident progression and offsite consequences using both state-of-the-art computational analysis tools and best modeling practices drawn from the collective wisdom of the severe accident analysis community. This study has focused on providing a realistic evaluation of accident progression, source term, and offsite consequences for the Surry Nuclear Power Station. By using the most current emergency preparedness practices, plant capabilities, and best available modeling, these analyses are more detailed, integrated, and realistic than past analyses. These analyses also consider all mitigative measures, contributing to a more realistic evaluation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick G. Westerman III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: November 14, 2003 | /s/ Frederick G. Westerman IIIFrederick G. Westerman III Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/s/ Kirk A. Benson                 
|Kirk A. Benson                     
|Chief Executive Officer May 6,
2008
|                                   
|/s/ Steven G. Stewart              
|Steven G. Stewart                  
|Chief Financial Officer May 6,
2008
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Development of a Coupled TRACE/PARCS Model for KKL and Benchmark Against the Turbine Trip Test (NUREG/IA-0469)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0469 (PDF – 3.15 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2016**Date Published:** April 2017

**Prepared by:** P. Papadopoulos, A. Sekhri

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Nuclear Power Plant of Leibstadt (KKL) is a participating member of the Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP) of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) to validate the TRACE code for BWR/6 transient analysis. The application of TRACE for the safety assessment of BWRs requires a throughout verification and validation using experimental data from tests but also plant data for the modelling. The purpose of this work is the review of the KKL TRACE/PARCS model, the benchmark of the model against plant data recorded during a turbine trip test and an investigation of the core lumping effect on the turbine trip test.

A coupled TRACE/PARCS model has been developed to analyze fast transients in KKL. The first benchmark against a turbine trip test has shown differences between the test data and the results predicted by TRACE/PARCS such as the total core power and the dome pressure. This is mainly due to unstable steady-state conditions during the initialization process and modelling issues. The improvements introduced in this work to the TRACE model are including but not limited to the geometry of the reactor internals, the redesign of the main steam lines and the implementation of a rudimentary control system. Furthermore, the PARCS input model has been updated with the turbine trip test corresponding cross sections. The new designed coupled TRACE/PARCS model was eventually benchmarked against the same turbine trip plant data.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**EXHIBIT
      32**





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





In
      connection with the report on Form 10-K/A of Janel World Trade, Ltd. for the
      fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the registrant certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.





Dated:
                January
                17, 2008
            /s/
                James N. JannelloJames
                N. Jannello, Executive
              Vice
                President and Chief
              Executive
                Officer




Dated:
                  January
                  17, 2008
            /s/Stephan
                P. CesarskiPresident
                and Chief
              Operating
                Officer





Dated:
                  January
                  17, 2008
            /s/Linda
                BielerController
                and Chief
              Financial
                and Accounting
              Officer
# L_2015015EN.01010602.xml

| 22.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 15/106 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 15/106

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1361/2014 of 18 December 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Financial Reporting Standards 3 and 13 and International Accounting Standard 40

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 365 of 19 December 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 365 of 19 December 2014

On page 121, Article 2:

for:

‘Article 2

Each company shall apply the amendments referred to in Article 1(1), at the latest, as from the commencement date of its first financial year starting on or after [set the first day of the month following the date of entry into force of this Regulation].’

,

read:

‘Article 2

Each company shall apply the amendments referred to in Article 1(1), at the latest, as from the commencement date of its first financial year starting on or after 1 January 2015.’

---