alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 2nd Meeting (NUREG/CP-0173)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0173 (PDF 7.86 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2001**Date Published:**July 2001

**Proceedings prepared by:** R. Bertrand, IPSN M. Dey, NRC

**Hosted by:** Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety 77-83, avenue du General-de-Gaulle -92140 Clamart B.P. 6 -92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex France

Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The 2nd meeting of the International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications was hosted by the Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety (IPSN) and held in the IPSN offices at Fontenay-aux-Roses, France on June 19 and 20, 2000. The Organizing Committee for the meeting included Remy Bertrand from the IPSN (France), and Moni Dey from the U.S. NRC. Eighteen experts from five countries attended this international meeting.

The purpose of the 2nd meeting was mainly to finalize the definition of a benchmark exercise to evaluate zone and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) fire models for application in nuclear power plants. This exercise was identified as the first task of the project and was aimed at evaluating the capability of fire models for simulating cable tray fires of redundant safety trains in nuclear power plants. The discussions at the meeting resulted in three main issues regarding input parameters for the scenarios in the benchmark exercise: (1) specification of the fire source; (2) modeling of the target; and (3) value for the lower oxygen limit. The specification of the fire source is fundamental to the input for fire models, and can significantly affect the predicted thermal environment. A consensus was reached on the characterization of the HRRs for the scenarios in the benchmark exercise. Although agreement was reached on the specification and values for the target model and lower oxygen limit to be used for the benchmark exercise, participants did not reach a consensus on the most appropriate specification that could be recommended for model users. The specification of the above three parameters could lead to "user effects," and are the largest sources of uncertainty in the predicted results from the input parameter specification process for the types of scenarios examined in the benchmark exercise.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Houston, Also Known as Tyrone Black, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 529]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered June 16, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People demonstrated that the challenged identification procedures were sufficiently attenuated from his unlawful arrest *(see, People v*Pleasant, 54 NY2d 972, *cert denied*455 US 924). Nor is there any merit to the defendant’s contention that the photographic array was unduly suggestive *(see, People v Devonish,*165 AD2d 723).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, issues of credibility and reliability of identification testimony are primarily questions of fact for the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84; *People v Androvett,*135 AD2d 640; *People v Rosa,*125 AD2d 345; *People v Caldwell,*125 AD2d 402). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
# L_2015058EN.01007401.xml

| 3.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/74

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/333

of 2 March 2015

appointing an Italian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the death of Mr Corrado ROSSITTO, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the death of Mr Corrado ROSSITTO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Flora GOLINI, Vicepresidente nonché Membro della Giunta esecutiva confederale della CIU (Confederazione Italiana di Unione delle professioni), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 2 March 2015.

For the Council

The President

D. REIZNIECE-OZOLA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Mustangs, Wolfpack Defenders Sharpen Skills through Iron Sights

By Airman 1st Class Gwendalyn Smith and Airman Daniel Garcia51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Report of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wayne R. Hellman, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to
my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: January 21, 2005 /s/ Wayne R. Hellman
Wayne R. Hellman
Chief Executive Officer
# L_2015062EN.01002401.xml

| 6.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/363

of 5 March 2015

concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 and Article 31(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 January 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/71/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1), which provided for an extension of the validity of their national permits for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Council Common Position 2002/400/CFSP (2) for a further period of 12 months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 January 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/71/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1), which provided for an extension of the validity of their national permits for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Council Common Position 2002/400/CFSP (2) for a further period of 12 months.

1

2

| (2) | On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 24 months, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 24 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Member States referred to in Article 2 of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP shall extend the validity of national permits for entry and stay granted pursuant to Article 3 of that Common Position for a further period of 24 months, starting from 31 January 2014.

Article 2

The Council shall evaluate the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP within six months of the adoption of this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2015.

For the Council

The President

D. REIZNIECE-OZOLA

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/71/CFSP of 31 January 2013 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (OJ L 32, 1.2.2013, p. 19).

1

(2)  Council Common Position 2002/400/CFSP of 21 May 2002 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (OJ L 138, 28.5.2002, p. 33).

2

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick G. Westerman III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: April 10, 2003 |  | /s/FREDERICK G. WESTERMAN IIIFrederick G. Westerman III
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Benchmark Implementation of Two Dynamic Methodologies for the Reliability Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems (NUREG/CR-6985)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6985, (PDF - 17.11 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2008**Date Published:** February 2009

**Prepared by:** T. Aldemir1, S. Guarro2, J. Kirschenbaum3, D. Mandelli1, L.A. Mangan1, P. Bucci3, M. Yau2, B. Johnson4, C. Elks4, E. Ekici5, M.P. Stovsky1, D.W. Miller1, X. Sun1, S.A. Arndt6, Q. Nguyen6, J, Dion7

1The Ohio State University, Nuclear Engineering Program, Columbus, OH 43210

2ASCA, Inc., 1720 S. Catalina Avenue, Suite 220, Redondo Beach, CA 90277-5501

3The Ohio State University, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Columbus, OH 43210

4University of Virginia, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Charlottesville, VA 22904

5The Ohio State University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Columbus, OH 43210

6U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

7Sandia National Laboratories, Department of Risk and Reliability Analysis, Albuquerque, NM 87185

S.A. Arndt and Q. Nguyen, NRC Project Managers

NRC Job Code K6472

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Two dynamic methodologies, dynamic flowgraph methodology (DFM) and the Markov/Cell-to-cell mapping technique (CCMT), are implemented on the benchmark Digital Feedwater Control System (DFWCS) specified in NUREG-6942, “Dynamic Reliability Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems for Nuclear Reactor Probabilistic Risk Assessments,” to demonstrate how an existing nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) can incorporate a digital upgrade of the instrumentation and control system. The results obtained from the DFM and Markov/CCMT models of the DFWCS failure modes are compared, and the impact of scenarios directly related to the hypothetical digital upgrade on the core damage frequency (CDF) is assessed on a demonstrative basis, using a plant PRA from NUREG-1150, “Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants.” The study shows that a DFWCS similar to that of an operating plant can be modeled using dynamic methodologies and that the results can be incorporated into an existing PRA to quantify the impact of a digital upgrade on the plant CDF.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard S., Respondent, v Erdogan Tekben, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 524]

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sherwood, J.), dated March 2, 1994, which directed the transfer of the petitioner, pursuant to CPL 330.20 (11), from a secure facility to a nonsecure facility.

*610Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Sherwood at the Supreme Court. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
No. 82-6002.

#### Colvin *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01206]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the 
Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William ``Todd'' Cole, Director, 
Office of Human Resources, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North 
Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20573.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sec. 4314(c)(1) through (5) of title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the 
initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.

Mario Cordero,
Chairman.

    The Members of the Performance Review Board Are:

1. Rebecca F. Dye, Commissioner
2. Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr., Commissioner
3. Michael A. Khouri, Commissioner
4. William P. Doyle, Commissioner
5. Clay G. Guthridge, Administrative Law Judge
6. Erin M. Wirth, Administrative Law Judge
7. Florence A. Carr, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis
8. Rebecca A. Fenneman, Director, office of Consumer Affairs & Dispute 
Resolution Services
9. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary
10. Vern W. Hill, Director, Managing Director
11. Peter J. King, Director, Bureau of Enforcement
12. Sandra L. Kusumoto, Bureau of Certification and Licensing

[FR Doc. 2015-01206 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIX HUMBERTO SARAVIA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72218 

Agency No. A070-955-456 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Felix Humberto Saravia, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo 

questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72218 

We deny the petition for review.

Our jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen 

proceedings sua sponte is limited to “reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions 

for legal or constitutional error.” See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 

2016). 

The BIA did not err in determining this court’s decision in Ceron v. Holder, 

747 F.3d 773 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc) does not constitute a material change in 

law. Id. (remanding to the BIA to consider whether conviction under California 

Penal Code § 245(a)(1) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude).

Contrary to Saravia’s contentions, the BIA did not err in its interpretation of 

Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder, 636 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2010), and determination that

it was proper to apply the aggravated felony definition to Saravia’s June 1986 

conviction for purposes of whether he was statutorily eligible for relief. See id. at 

1065 (recognizing that the classification of a crime as an aggravated felony is a 

separate issue from removability for that crime and leaving intact settled circuit 

law that a conviction prior to November 1988 may be considered an “aggravated 

felony” under current immigration law); see also Becker v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 

1000, 1002-03 (9th Cir. 2007).

Saravia contends he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel,

based upon prior counsel’s alleged failure to raise an argument under Ledezma-
3 14-72218 

Galicia, 636 F.3d 1059, before the agency, and failure to timely file a petition for 

review of the BIA’s order dismissing his appeal so that it would have been pending 

when Ceron, 747 F.3d 773, was decided. The BIA did not err in determining that

Saravia failed to establish prejudice from this alleged ineffective assistance. See 

Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826-27 (9th Cir. 2003) (requiring 

prejudice to state a valid claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, and explaining 

the presumption of prejudice for failing to file an appeal is rebutted when petitioner 

does not show plausible grounds for relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Argued and submitted October 8,

affirmed December 10, 1979,

reconsideration denied January 17,

petition for review denied February 20, 1980 (288 Or 571)

#### QUAST, *Appellant, v.*CITY OF ONTARIO, *Respondent.*

(No. 15,262-L, CA 13856)

603 P2d 1210

Max S. Taggart, II, Ontario, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Taggart and Taggart, Ontario.

Cliff S. Bentz, Ontario, argued and cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Yturri, Rose & Burnham, Ontario.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Lee and Richardson, Judges.

RICHARDSON, J.

*559RICHARDSON, J.,

In this action for false arrest plaintiff appeals from summary judgment for defendant granted on the basis of judicial immunity. The sole issue presented here is whether a municipal judge is immune from civil liability when he issues an arrest warrant in the good faith mistaken belief that a traffic fine was not paid.

In 1977 plaintiff was issued a traffic citation for a signal violation in Ontario, Oregon. On the day of his scheduled appearance in court, he posted bail and forfeited it as payment of a fine. Payment was noted on the citation by signature of the municipal court judge. Three months later, without further notice to plaintiff, the same judge issued a warrant of arrest for plaintiff. Plaintiff was arrested in the evening at his home in the presence of guests. In an affidavit filed with defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this case, the municipal judge stated that he had issued the warrant in the good faith belief that the traffic fine had not been paid. The warrant was issued on the basis of municipal court records indicating plaintiff had failed to post the required bail.

Plaintiff concedes that the judge had subject matter jurisdiction over the traffic offense, but he argues that once the fine had been paid, personal jurisdiction was thereafter lacking, and hence the judge was acting "wholly outside the jurisdiction of the court.” *Utley v. City of Independence,*240 Or 384, 387, 402 P2d 91 (1965). But *Utley*also clothes a judicial officer with immunity if the action complained of is one "within the colorable jurisdiction of the court.” Immunity applies "unless a clear absence of jurisdiction is at once apparent to the ordinary understanding.” *Utley, supra*at 386, citing *Cottam v. Oregon City,*98 F 570 (CC D Or 1899). A reasonable belief of the municipal judge that the fine had not been paid would be sufficient to render him immune from any liability, under *Utley.*Since the judge was immune from liability the defendant is immune as well, *Higgins v. Redding,*34 Or App 1029, 580 P2d 580*rev den*284 Or 80a (1978).

Affirmed.