alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture Ltd (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe W. Forehand,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.

                                          /S/  JOE W. FOREHAND
                                         --------------------------------------
                                          Joe W. Forehand
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Dated: October 30, 2002
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 



RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY


P.O. Box 1241


Grass Valley, CA  95945


530-478-0321


January 26, 2011












Perry Leopold, CEO


North Bay Resources Inc.


P.O. Box 162


Skippack, PA  19474


215-661-1100







Option Amendment No. 1

















Dear Perry,







As per our discussions, this writing will be Option Amendment No. 1.  The following amended terms and conditions are hereby incorporated in and made a part of the Option Agreement and Option Addendum dated September 1, 2010, (herein collectively referred to as the “Option”) on property known as the Ruby Gold Mine Old Henness Pass.  North Bay Resources Inc. is referred to as “Optionee” or “North Bay” and Ruby Development Company is referred to as “Optionor”.







1.  The termination date of the warrants provided in Paragaph b of Section 2 ADDITIONAL OPTION CONSIDERATION of the Option Addendum is hereby extended to December 30, 2015.  North Bay shall prepare and deliver a revised warrant certificate to Optionor within THIRTY (30) days.












2.  The amount of the Option extension payment payable on or before February 1, 2011, as provided in Paragaph b of Section 5 ADDITIONAL OPTION CONSIDERATION of the Option Addendum, is hereby reduced to TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00).












3.  Paragaph c of Section 5 ADDITIONAL OPTION CONSIDERATION of the Option Addendum is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







"c.  Optionee shall pay additional Option extension payments totaling ONE HUNDRED FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($140,000.00) as follows:  TEN









  





  











  
















THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) payable on March 1, 2011, THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($30,000.00) payable on April 1, 2011, FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) payable on May 1, 2011, and FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) payable on June 1, 2011;"


 

 







The foregoing terms and conditions are hereby agreed to and the undersigned acknowledge receipt of a copy of this document.


 




	
Date:     January 26, 2011                

	
Date:      January 26, 2011             


	  	  
	  	  
	
Optionee

	
Optionor:


	
NORTH BAY RESOURCES INC.

	
RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
By:    /s/ Perry Leopold                    

	
By:        /s/ W.R. Frederking               


	
Perry Leopold, CEO

	
W. R. “Rick” Frederking, Partner
Washington Bancorp
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share

                                   Exhibit 11
<TABLE>

                                                                      For the three months ended September 30,
                                                                  1998         1997         1998         1997
                                                                  Basic        Basic       Diluted      Diluted
                                                                   EPS          EPS          EPS          EPS
                                                                 ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>  
Computation of weighted average                                               
     number of common shares
     outstanding:
Common shares outstanding
     at the beginning of the period ........................     651,133      651,133      651,133      651,133
Unreleased common shares held by the
     Employee Stock Ownership
     Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
     of the period .........................................     (42,313)     (46,333)     (42,313)     (46,333)
Weighted average common shares
     released by the ESOP during
     the period ............................................         522          483          522          483
Weighted average common shares
     outstanding - Stock Option Plan .......................         - -          - -       16,728       15,840
Weighted average common shares
     into treasury .........................................     (35,270)         - -      (35,270)          --
                                                               ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Total average shares outstanding ...........................     574,072      605,283      590,800      621,123
                                                               =========    =========    =========    =========

     Net income ............................................   $ 195,163    $ 157,220    $ 195,163    $ 157,220
                                                               =========    =========    =========    =========

     Net income per share ..................................   $    0.34    $    0.26    $    0.33    $    0.25
                                                               =========    =========    =========    ========= 
</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Large Scale Validation of a Methodology for Assessing Software Reliability (NUREG/CR-7042)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7042 (PDF - 4.41 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2010**Date Published:** July 2011

**Prepared by:** C.S. Smidts, Y. Shi, M. Li, W. Kong, J. Dai

Reliability and Risk Laboratory Nuclear Engineering Program The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio

**NRC Project Managers:** S. Arndt, N. Carte, R. Shaffer, and M. Waterman

NRC Job Codes Y6591, N6878

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes the results of a research program initiated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at the University of Maryland1 to validate a method for predicting software reliability. The method is termed the Reliability Prediction System (RePS). The RePS methodology was initially presented in NUREG/GR-0019, “Software Engineering Measures for Predicting Software Reliability in Safety Critical Digital Systems” and validated on a small control system application with a set of five RePSs in NUREG/CR-6848, “Validation of a Methodology for Assessing Software Quality.” The current effort is a validation of the RePS methodology with respect to its ability to predict software quality (measured in this report and in NUREG/GR-0019 in terms of software reliability) and, to a lesser extent, its usability when applied to safety-critical applications.

The application under validation, herein defined as APP, is based on a safety-related digital module typical of what might be used in a nuclear power plant. The APP module contains both discrete and high-level analog input and output circuits. These circuits read input signals from a plant and send outputs that can be used to provide trips or actuations of system equipment, control a process, or provide alarms and indications. The transfer functions performed between the inputs and outputs are dependent on the software that is installed in the module.

The research described in this report provides evidence that twelve selected software engineering measures in the form of RePSs can be used (with different degrees of accuracy) to predict the reliability of software in safety-critical applications. These twelve measures are ranked based on their prediction ability. The rankings are then compared with those obtained through an expert opinion elicitation effort, as described in NUREG/GR-0019, and with those obtained through a small-scale validation, as described in NUREG/CR-6848.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6830

TERRY LEE DAVIS,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT STEVENSON, III,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(9:10-cv-00719-HFF)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on March 31, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on June 8, 

2011.*

 *

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).

Because Davis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses Applied to Criticality Safety Validation (NUREG/CR-6655)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### W. H. & R. S. TUCKER v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH.

(Por the Syllabus, see case between the two parties, *ante,*page 267.)

Civil ActioN, heard before Watts, J., at January Term, 1876, of Wake Superior Court.

The facts are substantially the same as in the preceding case between the same parties.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff according to the prayer of the complaint, and the defendant appealed.

*273*Busbee & Busbee,*for the appellant.

*Haywood, Fowle*and *Snow,*contra.

Reade, J.

An alternative, and not a peremptory *man-damns,*is the proper judgment. See opinion filed in a case, between same parties at this term. No error.

Per, Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of CancerVax Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
F. Hale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 29, 2004                           /s/ David F. Hale
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                     David F. Hale
                                                Chief Executive Officer

      In connection with the Annual Report of CancerVax Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
R. LaRue, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   March 29, 2004                            /s/ William R. LaRue
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                     William R. LaRue
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5117-5118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns ``Epi-Centers for the 
Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial 
Resistance and Adverse Events-Multicenter Expansion of Current 
Investigation'', Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CK11-
0010501SUPP15, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m., February 23, 2015 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters For Discussion: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Epi-Centers for the Prevention of Healthcare-
Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Adverse Events-
Multicenter Expansion of Current Investigation'', FOA CK11-
0010501SUPP15''.
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 718-8833. The 
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and

[[Page 5118]]

Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-01768 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### DOE ON DEMISE OF ISAAC LYERLY *vs.*CLAUDIUS B. WHEELER.

The date of a deed or other writing is *prima facie*evidence of the time of its execution, upon the principle, that the acts of every person, in transacting ■business, are presumed to be consistent with truth, in the absence of any motive for falsehood.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Rowan County, Spring Term 1851, his Honor Judge Battle presiding.

This was an action of ejectment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*Craig*and *Osborne,*for the plaintiff.

*Boyden,*for the defendant.

*291Pearson, J.

The lessor claimed title under a sheriff’s sale and deed. The demise was on the 6th of November 1848. The deed was dated on the same day.

The defendant contended, that the date of the deed was no evidence that it was executed on that day, and the plaintiff could not recover without proving, that it was executed on the day it bore date.

The Court charged, that the date of the deed was *prima facie*evidence of the time of its execution. To this, the defendant excepts; which is the only point made in the case.

There is no error. The date of the deed or other writing is *prima facie*evidence of theiime of its execution, upon the general principle, that the acts of every person, in transacting business, are presumed to f^ggJ^fesjfSj^ith truth, in the absence of any motive for

Per Curiam. fut1* kmed. LIBEAEf.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zeolite Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Alan Brandys, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 24th day of September, 2003.

| | /s/ Alan Brandys
Alan Brandys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------









---
# C_2015070EN.01000401.xml

| 27.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 17 February 2015

appointing the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

(2015/C 70/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 235/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

1

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Having regard to the approval of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 January 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/42/EU (2) appointing Mr Thomas WIESER as the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a period of 3 years from 23 March 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 January 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/42/EU (2) appointing Mr Thomas WIESER as the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a period of 3 years from 23 March 2012.

2

| (2) | It is therefore necessary to appoint a new Chairperson to take office upon expiry of the term of office which began on 23 March 2012. In order to harmonise the terms of office of all new board members, the term of office of the new Chairperson should begin on 1 February 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is therefore necessary to appoint a new Chairperson to take office upon expiry of the term of office which began on 23 March 2012. In order to harmonise the terms of office of all new board members, the term of office of the new Chairperson should begin on 1 February 2015.

| (3) | Article 3(3) in Decision No 235/2008/EC provides that the Chairperson is not to be a current member of either a National Statistical Office or the Commission, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 3(3) in Decision No 235/2008/EC provides that the Chairperson is not to be a current member of either a National Statistical Office or the Commission,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Martti HETEMÄKI is hereby appointed Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a period of 3 years from 1 February 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. REIRS

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 17.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2012/42/EU of 24 January 2012 appointing the Chairperson of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (OJ L 24, 27.1.2012, p. 11).

2

---
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: October 30, 2007/s/ Steven C. Straus   Steven C. Straus   Chief Executive Officer      Date: October 30, 2007/s/ Alan H. Buckey   Alan H. Buckey   Chief Financial Officer   
28