alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with Section 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on December 16-17, 2014.[1] 

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster maximum employment and price stability. In particular, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain such conditions. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and its policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency mortgage-backed securities transactions. The System Open Market Account manager and the secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, January 9, 2015.

William B. English,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on December 16-17, 2014, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual Report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-01008 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas M. Finn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Speedus Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004


By:    /s/ Thomas M. Finn
       ------------------
Name:  Thomas M. Finn
Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       18
#### Johnson and Others v. White’s Executors.

Monday, March 2, 1807.

continuance- Exceptions to Commissioner’s Report.*— A suit is not to be continued on the ground of exceptions to a commissioner's report, unless they ■were filed thirty days before the term, and good cause be shewn; but the Court will receive such exceptions at any time, provided the hearing of the cause be not thereby delayed.

Upon an appeal from a decree of Pitts-syl vania County Court.

In this cause, master commissioner Green-how made a report to the last term ; and, early in the present term, the decree of the court below was reversed, and a decree entered agreeably to the report of the commissioner, to which no exceptions were then filed; and now Mr. Wickham, counsel for the appellees, moved to set aside the decree, and to file exceptions to the report.

PER CURIAM.

The eighteenth rule of this Court requires that exceptions to reports should be filed thirty days before the term at which they may be acted upon ; but, notwithstanding this, the rule will not be construed as, at any time, to preclude a party from the benefit of exceptions ; but the hearing of the cause is not to be delayed on that account; nor, unless the exceptions are 1 filed within the time prescribed by the rule, and good cause be shewn.

The exceptions may now be filed; and the entry so amended, as to let it appear they have been overruled; the Court not perceiving in them any reasonable objections to the decree as it now stands.
No. 86-808.

#### Marchini *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00587-CV

IN RE Richard ALVAREZ, Petra Davina Trevino-Rodriguez, 

and Eliberto Roy Trevino

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 3, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On August 13, 2014, relators Richard Alvarez, Petra Davina Trevino-Rodriguez, and 

Eliberto Roy Trevino filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s ex parte 

temporary restraining order granted on August 12, 2014.

Respondent signed an ex parte temporary restraining order which prevented relators from 

engaging in their duties as mayor, city council member, and city manager for the City of Pearsall.

Relators commenced this original proceeding, challenging the restraining order as a void order 

issued without authority. Relators also requested emergency relief to temporarily stay the 

enforcement of the challenged order. On August 14, 2014, this court issued an order temporarily 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-08-00236-CVF, styled Concerned Citizens of Pearsall and Henry 

Martinez v. City of Pearsall, TX; Petra Davina Trevino-Rodriguez, Individually; Eliberto Roy Trevino, Individually; 

and Richard Alvarez, Individually, pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas, the Honorable 

Dick Alcala presiding.

 
04-14-00587-CV

staying the enforcement of the temporary restraining order and requesting a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus. Relators did not request that this court stay the expiration of the temporary 

restraining order, and we did not do so. The temporary restraining order expired by its own terms 

on August 26, 2014.

Ordinarily, the expiration of a temporary restraining order renders challenges to its issuance 

moot. See Hermann Hosp. v. Tran, 730 S.W.2d 56, 57 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, no 

writ). Because the temporary restraining order challenged in this proceeding has expired by its 

own terms, we conclude, without reaching the merits of the challenges asserted, that the petition 

for writ of mandamus has become moot and should be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition for 

writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. 

Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000) (holding that appellate courts have no jurisdiction to 

issue advisory opinions where issues raised in a pending matter have become moot).

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
L. Giordano, 

27 Shady Cove Ln., 

Noyac, Sag Harbor, NY 11963 

June 21, 2010 

FAA 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, 

Room W12-140, 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 

RE: The New York Nprth Shgye Heli(?Qpt^r I^Qttte (pQWmem IP F M 2Q»P-0?,P2-Q0Qt) 

Dear FAA: 

Please, please, please stop the helicopters, small planes, and jet planes from flying 

so noisily over our homes! 

Our sleep is disturbed and conversations are nullified by the sounds of the aircraft. 

It's getting almost impossible to even hear a child's cry! 

We live up "dn the ridge" in Noyac on Shady Cove Ln. 

They do not fly high enough to stop the "war zone noise". 

Help! From an aerial view, the tree canopy obscures the fact that we are 

residential, dense housing. 

Water, farmland, golf courses, and dumps are better fly ways. 

We spend time outdoors in the summer, that is why are "in the country" and we 

would like to appreciate the sounds of nature. 

HELP! 

Sincerely, 

L.Giordano 

631-725-7470 

fW-:
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the use of our name in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and to the incorporation by reference of our estimates of the proved reserves and future net revenues from proved reserves of
Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated as of December 31, 2006 into Transmeridian Exploration Incorporateds previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-132389, 333-129250, 333-127674, 333-120930, 333-135318,
333-135798 and 333-139923) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-105610, 333-105609 and 333-139232) and the related prospectuses.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
|                             
|RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.    
|                             
|Houston, Texas               
|March 7, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    1,689
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            40,653
<ALLOWANCES>                              1,340
<INVENTORY>                               6,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         51,601
<PP&E>                                    9,794
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           59,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    15,410
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     63
<OTHER-SE>                               43,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             59,460
<SALES>                                 134,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        134,012
<CGS>                                   108,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            23,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.21<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.20<F2>
        
<FN>
<F1>  The work "Primary" should be deleted and replaced with the word "Basic".

<F2>  This amount is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board
      Statement No. 128 and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      52,840,827              52,840,827
<SECURITIES>                                23,060,881              23,060,881
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,529,466              17,529,466
<ALLOWANCES>                               (4,247,590)             (4,247,590)
<INVENTORY>                                    573,497                 573,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,642,435              95,642,435
<PP&E>                                      22,497,125              22,497,125
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,208,747               4,208,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,696,985             125,696,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,393,753               7,393,753
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        42,678                  42,678
<OTHER-SE>                                 114,601,245             114,601,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,696,985             125,696,985
<SALES>                                     15,235,480              42,210,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,235,480              42,210,160
<CGS>                                        5,204,300              14,278,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,264,439              36,346,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,523                 414,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,902,310               7,921,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                   681,314               2,677,366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,220,996               5,243,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,220,996               5,243,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26                     .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25                     .64
        


</TABLE>
No. 91-616.

No. 91-635.

#### Diller v. Selvin & Weiner et al.; and Diller *v.*Selvin & Weiner.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
N OTE : This d isposition is n onprecedential.



# United **S tates**  **Court of** 

**A ppeals**  **for th e**  **Federal Circuit**

______________________
COMCAST CA BLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING L LC,

Appellee

KATHERINE K. VI DAL, U NDER S ECRETARY O F COMMERCE FO R I NTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF T HE UNI TED STATES PATENT AN D T RADEMARK O FFICE,

Intervenor

______________________
2020

- 2281

______________________ Appe al from the United States Patent and Trade mark Of fice, Patent Trial and Appe al Board in No s

. IP R2019 -0 0209, IPR2019 -0 1280.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J AMES L. D AY , J R ., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by D ANIEL C. C ALLAWAY , S USHILA C HANANA

. Case: 20-2281 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2022P HILIP W ANG , Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. J AY C HUNG , P AUL A NTHONY K ROEGER , R EZA M IRZAIE , J AMES S. T SUEI

.
W ILLIAM L A M ARCA , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by T HOMAS W. K RAUSE , M ONICA B ARNES L ATEEF , F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , P ROST , and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 15, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-2281 Document: 62 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2022
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00323-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.I., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 360-582890-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It 

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED: March 9, 2017

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2746-2747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Committee on Education and Human 
Resources (CEH), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the 
National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec.  1862n-5), 
and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. Sec.  552b), hereby 
gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction 
of National Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, January 23, 2:00-3:00 p.m., EST.

SUBJECT MATTER:  Chairman's remarks; discussion of Committee goals; and 
discussion of format for February meeting.

STATUS:  Open.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference. A public listening 
line will be available. Members of the public

[[Page 2747]]

must contact the Board Office (call 703-292-7000 or send an email 
message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1dfd0c5d8dedfd0ddc2d2d8d4dfd2d4d3c3d5f1dfc2d79fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="543a35203d3b3a353827373d313a3731362630143a27327a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>) at least 24 hours prior to the 
teleconference for the public listening number. Please refer to the 
National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional 
information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status 
of meeting) which may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. 
Point of contact for this meeting is Jacqueline Meszaros at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b61666e78716a79644b65786d256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670d0a02141d0615082709140149000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-00896 Filed 1-15-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10(a)


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
  by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 146 to Registration Statement
  No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our reports dated November 24, 2010, relating to
  the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock All-Cap Energy
  & Resources Portfolio, BlackRock Asset Allocation Portfolio, BlackRock Energy
  & Resources Portfolio, BlackRock Global Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock
  Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock International Opportunities
  Portfolio, BlackRock Small Cap Core Equity Portfolio, BlackRock Small Cap Growth
  Equity Portfolio, BlackRock Small/Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio, and BlackRock U.S.
  Opportunities Portfolio, each a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the
  Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds for the year ended September
  30, 2010, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights”
  in the Prospectuses, which are a part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte
& Touche LLP 

  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

  January 26, 2010
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00534-CR

Crystal I. MCBRIDE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-0539

Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 6, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). We grant the

motion and dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH