alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1862 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1862

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2017

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of certain 
   definitions pertaining to unlawful sexual conduct, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Global Child Protection Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF ILLICIT SEXUAL CONDUCT.

    Section 2423(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``a sexual act (as defined in section 2246) 
        with'' and inserting ``any conduct involving''; and
            (2) by striking ``if the sexual act'' and inserting ``if 
        the conduct''.

SEC. 3. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF FEDERAL SEX OFFENSE.

    Section 3559 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(2)(A)--
                    (A) by inserting after ``2244(a)(1)'' the following 
                ``or 2244(a)(5)'';
                    (B) by striking the ``or'' before ``2423(a)'';
                    (C) by striking ``into prostitution''; and
                    (D) by inserting ``or 2423(c) (relating to illicit 
                sexual conduct)'' before the semicolon at the end; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ``or 2423(a)'' and 
        inserting ``, 2423(a), or 2423(c)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# FRAPTRAN: NRC's Computer Code (NUREG/CR-6739)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 86-972.

#### Hummel *v.*Hummel.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Rosa, Chief Executive Officer of Balaton Power Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Michael Rosa       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Michael Rosa           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | August 11, 2006        

This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice on letters of nomination of candidates.

# SUMMARY:

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) established the Health Information Technology Policy Committee (Health IT Policy Committee) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing 13 of its 20 members. As the result of terms ending in April 2015, GAO is accepting nominations of individuals for four openings on the committee in the following categories of representation or expertise required in ARRA: Advocate for patients or consumers, health care provider, representative of a health plan or third party payer, and expertise in health care quality measurement and reporting. For appointments to the HIT Policy committee to be made in April 2015 in these categories, I am announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted by February 27, 2015 to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees.

# ADDRESSES:

*Email: HITCommittee@gao.gov.*

*Mail:*                         ATTN: HITPC Appointments, U.S. GAO, 441 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20548.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 GAO Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800. 42 U.S.C. 300jj-12.

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2015-01837 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Reference for Regulatory Guidance Applicable to License Transfers (NUREG/BR-0276)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document 
        - NUREG/BR-0276 (PDF - 333.48 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 2000

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

Standard Review Plans (SRPs) are prepared to guide Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants; SRPs are "living documents" and are updated periodically to reflect changes in the regulatory environment such as Federal statutes, NRC and sister agency regulations, Commission policy and practices. SRPs and other regulatory guidance are made available to the public as part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) policy to inform the nuclear industry and the general public of regulatory procedures and policies. SRPs are not substitutes for regulatory guides or for the Commission's regulations, and compliance with them is not required. Safety SRP sections are keyed to the Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, Regulatory Guide 1. 70. Not all sections of the Regulatory Guide have corresponding review plans.

This document was compiled as an overarching document to assist NRC staff, license transfer applicants and the general public by directing attention toward relevant regulatory guidance necessary to complete the license transfer application process pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80; this guidance includes the SRPs and other NUREG publications. The major areas of concentration of these documents are:
        - Financial Qualification
        - Decommissioning Funding
        - Foreign Ownership
        - Antitrust
        - Nuclear Insurance
        - Human Factors
        - Technical Qualifications

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM) (NUREG-1575)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
# C_2015207EN.01000501.xml

| 24.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, Bulgaria and Italy

(2015/C 207/05)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 was adopted on 19 June 2015.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, on 19 June 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. REIRS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 69, 13.3.2015, p. 1.

2

---
#### In re SANPO LAND INDUSTRIAL (HAWAII), INC., a Hawaii corporation, nka Kalakaua International Center, Inc., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 82-00649.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii.

Aug 7 1984

Joseph T. Kiefer, Harrison P. Chung, Honolulu, Hawaii, for debtor.

Douglas S. Hasegawa, Honolulu, Hawaii, for MONY.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REINSTATE AUTOMATIC STAY WITH RESPECT TO THE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

j0N j CHINEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On March 27, 1984, on the eve of the trial on the Motion for Relief from Stay filed by first mortgagee, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York (hereafter “MONY”), a Stipulation for Order Granting Relief from Stay and Order thereon was entered herein, signed by counsel for *359MONY, counsel for debtor, and Masami Kato, as president and Chairman of the Board for debtor and, individually, as sole stockholder and a creditor of debtor. Said stipulation provided for relief from the stay for MONY as of March 26, 1984, and also provided that Mr. Kato would, pursuant to a schedule of payments laid out therein, purchase MONY’s secured interest, the final payment for $13,400,000.00, together with interest thereon at the rate of $4,405.48 per day from April 27, 1984, due at 4:00 o’clock p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time on July 27, 1984.

The final paragraph of the stipulation states:

> 6. The Debtor, Kato and MONY agree and stipulate that no appeal may be taken from this Stipulation and Order, and the Debtor, Kato and MONY waive any and all rights to seek reconsideration or modification of this Stipulation and Order.

On July 27, 1984, Debtor filed the instant Motion to Reinstate Automatic Stay with Respect to the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, wherein the Court is requested to extend for two months the automatic stay and the time period within which Mr. Kato is required to make the above-mentioned final payment to MONY, alleging that circumstances beyond Mr. Kato’s control precluded his ability to make the requisite final payment by July 27, 1984.

The Stipulation was freely entered by the signing parties and no acts of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct have been pled as grounds for the relief requested. Rather, one of the parties, currently unable to perform, wishes to extend the time for his performance after having the benefit of the other party’s restraint in pursuing relief from the stay for four months. Based on these considerations and the agreement by the parties that no modification of the Stipulation would be requested, the Motion to Reinstate Automatic Stay is hereby Denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Effect of Thermal Aging and Neutron Irradiation on Crack Growth Rate and Fracture Toughness of Cast Stainless Steels and Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds (NUREG/CR-7185)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7185 (PDF - 11.48 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2014**Date Published:** July 2015

**Prepared by:**Omesh K. Chopra

Argonne National LaboratoryArgonne, IL 60439

Appajosula S. Rao, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Cast austenitic stainless steel (CASS) materials and austenitic stainless steel (SS) welds, both of which have a duplex structure, are susceptible to thermal aging embrittlement during reactor service. In addition, prolonged exposure of these materials used in core support structure and reactor internals to neutron irradiation changes their microstructure and microchemistry, which further degrades their fracture properties. The core support structures and reactor internals also contain austenitic SS welds. The purpose of this effort was to review and evaluate the existing thermal aging and neutron irradiation embrittlement data on these materials to update the methodology developed earlier at Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) for estimating the degradation of mechanical properties of these materials during reactor service. The methodology developed earlier in NUREG/CR-4513 Rev. 1, 1994, to determine the kinetics and extent of thermal embrittlement from known material information as a function of time and temperature of service, has been reviewed and, where necessary, updated to incorporate recent data published after the NUREG/CR-4513 Rev.1 report was published. The updated methodology is used to estimate the fracture toughness J-R curve of thermally aged CASS materials as a function of time and temperature of service. The existing data on irradiated materials were also evaluated to define a threshold fluence level above which irradiation effects on materials properties are significant. This report also examines the combined effects of thermal and neutron embrittlement, which can degrade the fracture toughness of these materials more than predicted from either of the processes independently. Potential information gaps in the data needed to adequately address the effects of thermal aging and neutron irradiation on fracture properties of CASS materials and austenitic SS welds were identified.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

EX-32.2 5 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Edward W. Stone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Edward W. StoneEdward W. StoneChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2006
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60466 Summary Calendar

FRANK O’BRIEN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

WAL-MART STORES INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

(5:95-CV-26-Br-S)
December 23, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Wal-Mart Inc. appeals the adverse judgment against it entered

by the district court pursuant to the jury’s verdict in this slip

and fall case. Wal-Mart assigns three errors: (1) Exclusion of

evidence that Plaintiff failed to disclose prior related litigation

in answers to interrogatories; (2) refusal to give part of a charge

requested by Wal-Mart; (3) insufficiency of the evidence to support2

the amount of damages awarded by the jury. We affirm.

In answers to interrogatories Plaintiff failed to identify the

suit entitled State Life Insurance Co. v. O’Brien in which O’Brien

sought disability benefits resulting from injuries sustained in the

fall at Wal-Mart, and in which the court had found that O’Brien had

engaged in a scheme to defraud the insurance company by over

insuring himself to gain a profit. The parties do not make clear

whether Wal-Mart wished only to cross examine O’Brien about why he

had not declared this suit, or whether it also wanted to get before

the jury the court’s finding in that suit. The record indicates

both. Wal-Mart’s counsel admitted no prejudice from the failure to

disclose (because he became aware of the matter through other

means) and the district court ruled that the order and reasons in

that case were not material to the instant trial. We see no abuse

of discretion.

Wal-Mart argues that the court’s instruction to the jury did

not permit the jury to find that t he accident may have been

entirely the fault of Plaintiff. Technically, the instruction can

be read th at way. However, Appellant did not object to the

comparative negligence instruction given by the court (and indeed

it was a correct instruction) and, in the charge objected to, the

court was obviously trying to allow for the fact that Mississippi

has done a way with the “open and obvious” defense. We also note

that the jury did not assign any negligence at all to the

Plaintiff. The error in the instruction, if any, was therefore3

harmless.

Finally, Appellan t ’s contention that the damage award is

excessive is without merit. The record fully supports the amount

awarded. The fact that the verdict was general does not change

that result.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         439,299
<SECURITIES>                                   576,918
<RECEIVABLES>                                  652,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (39,899)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,688,784
<PP&E>                                       3,592,268
<DEPRECIATION>                               (767,871)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,137,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,475,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        250
<COMMON>                                         4,880
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,505,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,137,030
<SALES>                                        203,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,849,371
<CGS>                                          161,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,088,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,951,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,367,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,367,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,367,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.477)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.477)
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffEvidence Building Plan (NUREG-2252)

# Evidence Building Plan: Fiscal Year 2022 (NUREG-2252, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-2252, Volume 1 (PDF – 2.71 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**April 2022

Office of the Executive Director for OperationsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the agency) is an independent agency established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, which began operations in 1975 as a successor to the Atomic Energy Commission. The NRC is required by the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 to develop an agency evidence-building plan. An evidence-building plan is a systematic approach for identifying and addressing priority questions relevant to the agency’s programs, policies, and regulations. More broadly, it is a coordination tool to engage stakeholders in evidence planning and building to help achieve an agency’s mission. The evidence-building plan is intended to emphasize and foster an agency culture of learning and continuous improvement. Once an evidence-building plan is implemented, decisionmakers can use the resulting evidence to guide choices to improve the agency programs, policies, and regulations. The evidence-building plan includes nine priority questions to support agency needs and the fiscal years 2022 - 2026 strategic goals and objectives.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 29, 2023