alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC StaffThe Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (NUREG/BR-0249)

# The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (NUREG/BR-0249, Revision 4)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0249, Revision 4 (PDF - 331 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** December 2013

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

Through the Atomic Energy Act, Congress made it possible for the public to receive a full and fair hearing on civilian nuclear matters. Individuals who are directly affected by any licensing action involving a facility producing or utilizing nuclear materials can participate in a hearing before independent judges of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (ASLBP or the Panel).

The ASLBP is the independent trial-level adjudicatory body of the NRC. Acting on behalf of the Commission, individual Licensing Boards conduct (1) public hearings concerning contested issues that arise in the course of licensing and enforcement proceedings regarding nuclear reactors and the civilian use of nuclear materials in the United States; and (2) uncontested hearings regarding matters such as the construction of uranium enrichment facilities. As such, the ASLBP fulfills both the NRC's obligation to afford the public and those subject to agency enforcement actions an opportunity to challenge proposed licensing and enforcement activities as required by Section 189(a) of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) and its responsibility under AEA Sections 189(a) and 193 to conduct a public hearing regarding the construction of certain types of facilities, even if there is not a challenge by any affected person or entity. These hearings are conducted in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act and the Commission's implementing regulations, set forth at 10 CFR Part 2.

A unique feature of the ASLBP that distinguishes it from similar federal regulatory or administrative tribunals is that each Licensing Board ordinarily is comprised of three administrative judges, usually consisting of one attorney skilled in the conduct of administrative hearings and two experts in scientific or technical areas relevant to the subject matter of the dispute. This scientific enhancement of the adjudicatory function is statutorily mandated by Section 191 of the AEA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Prevention Insurance.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Alan P.
Donenfeld, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
August 19, 2008.






/s/
Alan P. Donenfeld


Alan P.
Donenfeld
PARKER & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
200-2560 Simpson Road
Richmond, B.C. Canada V6X 2P9
Tel: (604) 276-9920     Fax:  (604) 276-2415

March 28, 2003


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  U.S.A. 20549


Reference:  eXmailit.com
            Audited Financial Statements
            For the Years Ended 31 December 2002 and 2001

Dear Sirs:

We refer to the US Securities and Exchange Commissions Form 10-KSB, Annual
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 for eXmailit.com dated 31 December 2002.

We consent to the use in the above mentioned Form of our report dated 21
March 2003 to the stockholders' of eXmailit.com on the following financial
statements:

   Statement of financial position as at 31 December 2002 and 2001;
   Statements of results of operations and cash flows for the years
     ended 31 December 2002 and 2001; and
   Statement of changes in stockholders' equity from inception,
   6 April 2000 to 31 December 2002.

We report that we have read the Form 10-KSB for submission to the US
Securities and Exchange Commission and have no reason to believe that there
are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is
derived from the financial statements which we have reported on or that is
within our knowledge as a result of our audit of such financial statements.

This letter is provided to the US Securities and Exchange Commission to
which it is addressed pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and not for any other purpose.

Yours truly

/s/ Parker & Co.
    Chartered Accountants
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Morris Business Development Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 14, 2010





/s/ George Morris


George Morris


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Morris Business Development Company and will be retained by Morris Business Development Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2015127EN.01001901.xml

| 22.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 127/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 127/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/798

of 11 May 2015

authorising the European Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the European Union, amendments to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192(1) and Article 218(3) and (4) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,

Whereas the Commission should be authorised to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, amendments to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1) and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (2),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Commission is hereby authorised to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, as regards matters falling within the Union's competence and in respect of which the Union has adopted rules, amendments to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer at the Conference of the Parties to that Convention and at the Meetings of the Parties to that Protocol in 2015 and 2016.

Article 2

1.   The negotiations shall be conducted by the Commission in consultation with the special committee designated by the Council, and in accordance with the negotiating directives of the Council set out in the Addendum to this Decision.

2.   The Council may review those negotiating directives at any time. To that effect, the Commission shall report to the Council on the outcome of the negotiations after each negotiating session and, where appropriate, on any problem that may arise during the negotiations.

Article 3

To the extent that the subject matter of the amendments referred to in Article 1 falls within the shared competence of the Union and of the Member States, the Commission and the Member States should cooperate closely during the negotiating process, with a view to ensuring unity in the international representation of the Union and its Member States.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Commission.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. DŪKLAVS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 297, 31.10.1988, p. 10.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 297, 31.10.1988, p. 21.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffry
J. Parell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Jeffry J. Parell
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jeffry J. Parell
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        July 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-18-1999
<CASH>                                          33,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,600
<INVENTORY>                                     41,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,900
<PP&E>                                         777,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 438,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 590,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,800
<BONDS>                                        407,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (72,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   590,900
<SALES>                                        658,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               658,900
<CGS>                                          191,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  636,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (700)
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05



</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Post-Test Analysis of Hot Leg 2x25% Break at PSB-VVER Facility Using TRACE V5.0 Code (NUREG/IA-0248)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0248 (PDF - 2.01 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**February 2011

**Prepared by:** P. Heralecky, M. Blaha

TES Ltd Prazska 597 674 01 Trebic, Czech Republic

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The best estimate thermo-hydraulic computer code TRACE V5.0 has been assessed using Hot Leg 2x25% break experiment at the large-scale test facility PSB VVER. The PSB-VVER facility is a 1:3000 volume scaled model of VVER 1000 NPP located in Electrogorsk, Russia. An extensive TRACE input deck of PSB-VVER facility was developed including all important components of the PSB-VVER facility: reactor, 4 separated loops, pressurizer, break unit, main circulation pumps, steam generators, break section and important parts of secondary circuit. The TRACE (TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine) is the latest in a series of advanced, best-estimate reactor systems codes developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in frame of CAMP (Code Application and Maintenance Program). The TRACE code is a component-oriented reactor systems analysis code designed to analyze light water reactor transients up to the point of significant fuel damage. The original validation of the TRACE code was mainly based on experiments performed on experimental facilities of typical PWR design. There are some different features of VVER design comparing to PWR. Therefore the validation of the thermo-hydraulic codes for VVER types of reactors is required by regulators. The purpose of performed analysis is to extend the validation of the TRACE code focused on VVER type of NPP′s. This work was performed in the frame of R&D project sponsored by The Ministry of Industry and Trade of Czech Republic.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the Company)
dated March 16, 2005 containing the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Martin P. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. By:
    /s/ Martin P. HughesMartin P. HughesChief Executive Officer March 16, 2005
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Void Swelling and Microstructure of Austenitic Stainless Steels Irradiated in the BOR-60 Reactor (NUREG/CR-7128)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7128 (PDF - 29.20 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2011**Date Published:** November 2012

**Prepared by:** Y. Chen,1 Y. Yang,2 Y. Huang,2 T. Allen,2 B. Alexandreanu,1 and K. Natesan1

1Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439

2University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706

NRC Project Manager, A. S. Rao

NRC Job Code N6519

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As nuclear power plants age and neutron fluence increases, detrimental effects resulting from radiation damage have become an increasingly important issue for the operational safety and structural integrity of core internal components. In this study, irradiated specimens of reactor core internal components were characterized by transmission electron microscopy. The specimens had been irradiated to 5.5-45 dpa in the BOR-60 reactor at a dose rate close to 10-6 dpa/s and temperature of about 320°C. No voids were observed in the austenitic stainless steels and nickel alloys at all doses. Despite the possibility that fine voids below the TEM resolution limit may be present, it was clear that void swelling was insignificant in all examined alloys up to 45 dpa. Irradiated microstructures of the studied alloys were dominated by a high density of Frank loops. The mean size and density of the Frank loops varied from one material to another, but saturated with increasing dose above  ̃10 dpa. While no irradiation-induced precipitations were present below 24.5 dpa, fine precipitates were evident in several alloys at 45 dpa.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff Rates TMI "Superior" in Operations and Maintenance, "Good" in Plant Support and "Adequate" in Engineering

----

----

I-98-23

March 2, 1998

**NRC STAFF RATES TMI "SUPERIOR" IN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, "GOOD" IN PLANT SUPPORT AND "ADEQUATE" IN ENGINEERING**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has rated performance at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant as "superior" in operations and maintenance, "good" in plant support and "adequate" in engineering, the four areas of review in the NRC's latest Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP). The plant is operated by GPU Nuclear, Inc.

The NRC issues SALP reports for the nation's commercial nuclear power plants about once every 18 months. Three levels of ratings are used in the reports: Category 1 ("superior"), Category 2 ("good"), and Category 3 ("acceptable").

The latest TMI SALP covers the period from August 5, 1996, through January 24 of this year.

In a letter to the utility, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller wrote that performance during the assessment period was "mixed." He recognized the superior performance ratings in operations and maintenance, and also noted that senior management of in-plant activities was "usually a strength with a generally good focus on problem identification and resolution."

However, he said the performance decline in the engineering area was the second consecutive assessment in which a decline was noted, "indicating that previous efforts to improve performance in that area were not effective." Significant problems were noted in many engineering program areas, including in-service testing, motor-operated valve programs, the technical classification list process and technical support. By contrast, Mr. Miller said, "system engineering provided generally good support to address emergent issues. The procurement engineering program was excellent and had good management oversight."

The NRC staff will meet with utility officials at 2:00 p.m., on March 18 at the TMI Nuclear Training Center (Route 441 South) in Middletown, Pa. The meeting is open to the public for observation.

NOTE: SALP reports are available on the NRC's internet web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of  International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Pontius, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December 21, 2006



/s/ Jeffrey A. Pontius

Jeffrey A. Pontius
Chief Executive Officer
I-1

LCC IC

OC

r

t

t

= +

+

∑

( ) 1

(5.1)

APPENDIX I: ERRATA APPENDIX

I.1 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 4

page 4-12:

Table 4.8 Revised Reverse Engineering Production Cost Multipliers for 3-ton Unitary

Equipment

Efficiency

Level

(SEER)

Split Air

Conditioner

(cased coil)

Split Air

Conditioner

(fancoil)

Split Heat Pump Packaged Air

Conditioner

Packaged Heat

Pump

Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised

10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

11 1.12 1.12 1.21 1.16 -- 1.05 -- 1.09 -- 1.08

12 1.28 1.28 -- 1.25 1.11 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.10 1.13

13 1.44 1.44 1.66 1.42 1.35 1.30 1.47 1.43 -- 1.38

14 1.60 1.60 1.76 1.82 1.63 1.79 -- 1.74 -- 1.74

15 -- -- 1.96 1.99 1.84 1.94 -- 1.87 -- 1.86

page 4-23: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following:

The highest efficiency level that is “technologically feasible” is known as “Max Tech.”

page 4-36: Replace last sentence, first paragraph with the following:

However, along with other potential drawbacks, not being applicable to indoor coil and heat pump

applications limits its potential use to cooling-only condensers.

I.2 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 5

page 5-9:

 EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 311
I-2

U year age U year age

U

U

movals tired

movals

age

tired

age

Re Re

Re

Re

( , ) ( = , ) ⋅

∑

∑

=

=

1

30

1

30 (6.6)

( )

( )

PBP years Rebutt

$2510 $2243

$355 $310 = .

−

−

= 58

[ ( )]

Prob

Price-PWF*OS) Income

=

+

− + ⋅

1

1

a b e(

(6.24)

page 5-65: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following:

The assumed annualized repair cost for baseline efficiency centralair-conditioning and heat pump

equipment (i.e., the cost the consumer pays annually for repairing equipment) and equipment with

efficiencies greater than 13 SEER are based on the following expression:

page 5-111:

I.3 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 6

page 6-9:

page 6-23:

 EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 311