alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10112 Summary Calendar

MATIAS MONTEMAYOR DE LA PAZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-344-Y

-------------------- December 11, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Matias Montemayor De La Paz, federal prisoner # 14272-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. De La Paz was convicted by a jury of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE) in conjunction with numerous drug-related offenses. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. See Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because De La Paz has failed to file an amendedNo. 02-10112 -2- notice of appeal from the district court’s amended judgment of dismissal, we lack jurisdiction over his appeal. F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Shou-Kang Chen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 4, 2010



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Dresden Nuclear Power Plant

----

----

February 2, 2000

**NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Dresden Nuclear Power Plant**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of Desiree Smith as the agency's Senior Resident Inspector at the Dresden Nuclear Power Plant in Morris, Illinois.

Smith, a NRC employee since 1987, began her new duties at Dresden Jan. 31.

Since joining the NRC, she has held a number of positions within the agency, the latest one being that of examiner trainee in which she conducted operator licensing examinations. She earned a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago.

Smith, her husband Derek and daughter live in Maywood, Illinois.

Smith joins resident inspectors David Roth and Billy Dickson Jr. at Dresden. They can be reached at the Dresden plant at (815) 942-9267.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Development of Horizontal Off-Take Model for Application to Reactor Headers of CANDU Type Reactors (NUREG/IA-0239)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0239 (PDF - 1.48 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2010**Date Published:**June 2010

**Prepared by:** Yong Jin Cho, Seung-Hoon Ahn, In-Goo Kim/KINS

Gyoo Dong Jeon/HYU

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) 19 Gusung-Dong, Yuseong-Gu Daejeon, 305-338, Korea

Hanyang University 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu Seoul, 133-791, Korea

Antony Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In the CANDU accident analysis the header is one of the important components to be well modeled, because it has great impact on the fuel channel behavior during some accidents. The feeder void fraction, affected by thermal-hydraulic behavior in the headers, may affect the fuel bundle coolability. The liquid entrainment and vapor pull-through (off-take) phenomena in the header are considered highly important, in case where horizontal stratification is achieved inside the header.

To generalize the model for application to various branch angles, a critical height correlation was reconstructed by using the point skin method, and then the constants were determined so the correlation can fit well with the previous large number of experimental data. The new model considers the effects of different branch angles on the off-take, and tested against the experimental data of various branch angles in a Separate Effect Test (SET).

The verification analysis results in a conceptual blowdown problem showed that the new model gives better accuracy than the original. The new model also provided an enhancement in prediction of the experimental data selected for validation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-0800

# Operational Radiation Protection Program  (NUREG-0800, Section 12.5 Rev.3) Draft Report for Comment

This NUREG publication has been issued for public comment. Comment period is now closed.

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download Complete Document
        - NUREG-0800, Section 12.5 Draft Rev.3 

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**December 2005

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

The revision updates the Revision 1 July 1981 version of NUREG-0800, Chapter 12, section 12.5, Operational Radiation Protection Program, to the Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants. The changes consist mostly of revising the references to 10 CFR 20; assigning different responsibilities to the primary and secondary branches because of office reorganizations; editorial and formatting changes as part of the SRP update effort; and updating the references to several guidance documents and industry standards. The revision also adds standard paragraphs to extend application of the updated SRP section to the design certification reviews as well as to extend implementation of this section to submittals by applicants pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or 10 CFR Part 52.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffStrategic Plan (NUREG-1614)

# Strategic  Plan: FY 2004 – FY 2009 (NUREG-1614, Volume 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - A Message from the Chairman

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1614, Volume 3 (PDF - 442.85 KB)            - Strategic Plan At-A-Glance 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: August 2004**Date Published**: August 2004

Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## A Message from the Chairman

My fellow Commissioners and I are pleased to present the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2004 to 2009. The plan describes how we intend to accomplish our mission. In particular, it establishes our strategic direction by defining the agency vision, goals, outcomes, and strategies that we intend to pursue.

The new Strategic Plan incorporates a number of revisions in order to address a changing environment. The events of September 11, 2001, brought to this country a new recognition of the importance of physical security and emergency preparedness. We recognize that safety, security, and emergency preparedness are integrated activities, and we have revised the plan to reflect this new reality. The Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2004-2009 gives prominence to the value of openness in our regulatory processes as essential for ensuring that the NRC remains a strong, fair, predictable, and credible regulator. We continue to believe that our actions must be effective, efficient, realistic, and timely. Management excellence is also essential for successful implementation of our mission and goals.

In developing our Strategic Plan, we benefited from input from the public, those we regulate, and those interested in the effectiveness of regulation. We thank all our stakeholders who shaped the Strategic Plan, especially the NRC staff that has worked diligently to produce a Strategic Plan that we believe is comprehensive, clear, and can be readily understood. The Strategic Plan for 2004-2009 will serve as a guide for how we will discharge our responsibilities to serve the American public.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Computational Benchmark for Estimated Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in BWR Burnup Credit (NUREG/CR-7157, ORNL/TM-2012/96)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7157 (PDF - 2.35 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2012**Date Published:** February 2013

**Prepared by:** D. E. Mueller, J. M. Scaglione, J. C. Wagner, and S. M. Bowman

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code V6061

**Prepared for**: Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report proposes and documents a computational benchmark for the estimation of the additional reactivity margin available in spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from fission products and minor actinides in a burnup-credit storage/transport environment, relative to SNF compositions containing only the major actinides. The benchmark problem/configuration is a generic burnup-credit cask designed to hold 68 boiling water reactor (BWR) spent nuclear fuel assemblies. The purpose of this computational benchmark is to provide a reference configuration for the estimation of the additional reactivity margin for partial burnup credit (ISG-8) and document reference estimations of the additional reactivity margin as a function of initial enrichment, burnup, and cooling time. This benchmark model will also be used as the base case in future sensitivity studies, to be documented in a companion NUREG/CR. The geometry and material specifications are provided in sufficient detail to enable independent evaluations. Estimates of additional reactivity margin for this reference configuration may be compared to those of similar burnup-credit casks to provide an indication of the validity of design-specific estimates of fission-product margin. The reference solutions were generated with the SCALE 6.1 package. The SCALE depletion and criticality sequences have been extensively validated elsewhere for a variety of applications, including light water reactor fuel. Note that the reference solutions presented in this report are not directly or indirectly based on experimental results. Consequently, this computational benchmark cannot be used to satisfy the ANS 8.1, 8.24, and 8.27 requirements for validation of calculational methods and is not intended to be used to establish biases and bias uncertainties for burnup-credit analyses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Access Control Systems: Technical Information for NRC Licensees (NUREG-1964)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1964 (PDF - 19.52 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2011**Date Published:** April 2011

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides technical details applicable to access control methods and technologies commonly used to protect facilities licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It contains information on the application, use, function, installation, maintenance, and testing parameters for access control and search equipment and the implementation of protective measures that support access control. This information is intended to assist licensees in designing, installing, employing, and maintaining access control systems at their facilities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# An Assessment of TRACE V5 RC1 Code Separator Model with the Westinghouse Model Boiler 2 Experiments (NUREG/IA-0224)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0224 (PDF - 541 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**April 2010

**Prepared by:**S. Hillberg

VTT—Technical Research Centre of FinlandNuclear Power Plant ModelingP.O.B. 100002044 VTTFinland

Antony Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) model of the Model Boiler 2 test facility has been built as part of the International Code Assessment and Maintenance Program (CAMP) validation case. Simulation cases with 100-percent and 50-percent power levels were run, and the results were compared to tests that were performed in the facility in the early 1980s. Because the main interest was in the functionality of the primary separator, the model includes no steam dryer assembly. The only heat structures built into the model were the primary-secondary heat transfer elements, since the model was run in a steady state and therefore the heat capacities of the structures had little effect on the results.

The Model Boiler 2 test facility failed to achieve the intended primary separator efficiencies in an oscillation-free system. Primary separator drain conditions had a major effect on the stability of the system and on the efficiency of the separation. A bigger drain area resulted in separation levels that were closer to the set value, but the system drifted easily into heavy oscillation. When the drain area was smaller, the separation levels were not achieved, but the system became more stable.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 82-5928.

#### Elenes-Cazares *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Consideration of amicus participation; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 22, 2015.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01519 Filed 1-23-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Estate of Ullrich: Ullrich and wife, Claimants, Appellants, vs. Schiltz, Executrix, Respondent.

For the appellants: *Joseph Witmer,*attorney, and *Albert H. Krugmeier*of counsel, both of Appleton.

For the respondent: *Sigman & Sigman*of Appleton.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D., certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Molecular
Devices Corporation;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

      4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

            b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

      5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------

Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer