alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FOR ROCKY MOUNTAIN
INTERNET, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         730,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,105,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                   205,248
<INVENTORY>                                     57,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,842,445
<PP&E>                                       4,853,733
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,833,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,721,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,275,133
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,990
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,735,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,952,556
<SALES>                                        265,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,506,366
<CGS>                                          202,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,121,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,146,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             232,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,328,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,328,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,328,360)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.9





Exhibit 10.9




			
	 	 	 
	North America Reseller Agreement Acknowledgment
	 	






North America Reseller Agreement Acknowledgment






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	XETA Technologies
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	Reseller Name
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	1814 West Tacoma
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	Address
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Broken Arrow OK 74012

	 	 	 	 	 	918-664-8200	 	 
	 
	City

	 	State
	 	Zip
	 	Telephone
	 	Fax






As of the 27th  day of September, 2010 (“Effective Date”) the
Reseller identified above (“Reseller”) hereby agrees to the terms and conditions (including those
contained in any exhibits thereto) of the ShoreTel, Inc. (“ShoreTel”) North America Reseller
Agreement (“Reseller Agreement”) posted at http://partners.shoretel.com/manage/.



Reseller agrees that ShoreTel may amend the terms and conditions of the Reseller Agreement from
time to time and that the terms and conditions applicable to Reseller and its relationship with
ShoreTel and any purchase orders placed by Reseller at any given time will be those in effect on
the web page at such time.



Reseller agrees that Exhibit A hereto shall be incorporated into and made part of the
Reseller Agreement.



Reseller further agrees that by executing this Acknowledgment any existing reseller contracts
between ShoreTel and Reseller are terminated and that this Reseller Agreement supersedes all
previous reseller contracts between ShoreTel and Reseller.



Reseller certifies that it has read and agreed to the provisions set forth in this Acknowledgment
and to the terms and conditions posted at http://partners.shoretel.com/manage/ and the undersigned
is duly authorized to sign this Acknowledgment.



Reseller Acknowledgement of Agreement




	 	 	 	 	 
	Reseller:

	 	XETA Technologies	 	 
	 
	Signature:

	 	/s/ Robert B. Wagner
 

	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	Robert B. Wagner	 	 
	Title:

	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	Date:

	 	September 27, 2010	 	 






Effective 10/01/2008 -Confidential and Proprietary-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1846 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1846

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

 Ms. Wasserman Schultz (for herself and Mr. Smith of Texas) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2017'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 
              CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM.

    Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by striking 
        ``2016'' and inserting ``2022''; and
            (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 17617(a)(10)), by 
        striking ``fiscal year 2018'' and inserting ``each of fiscal 
        years 2018 through 2022''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JUSTIN BEGANDY,

Petitioner

v.

CLERK OF COURTS OF ALLEGHENY 

COUNTY, AND CAROL A. EDDINS, 

COURT ADMINISTRATION, CRIMINAL 

DIVISION, ALLEGHENY COUNTY 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 27 WM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2019, the “Petition for Review in Mandamus” 

and the Application for Relief are DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [AAK6006201 156A2100DD AOR3030.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is extending the public scoping  period for the Aiya Solar Project on the Moapa River Indian Reservation.

# DATES:

Scoping comments are due on January 30, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Chip Lewis at (602) 379-6782; email:                         *chip.lewis@bia.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The BIA published a Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 21, 2014 (79 FR 69522) and provided for a 30-day scoping comment period. The BIA is extending the comment period from December 22, 2014, to January 30, 2015. Please refer to the November 21, 2014 (79 FR 69522) Notice of Intent for project details and commenting instructions.                

Dated: January 14, 2015.

Kevin K. Washburn,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2015-01583 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-2A-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffStrategic Plan (NUREG-1614)

# Strategic  Plan: Fiscal Years  2014-2018 (NUREG-1614, Volume 6)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1614, Volume 6 (PDF - 1.90 MB)
        FY 2014-2018 Strategic Plan Comment Resolution Matrix (PDF - 2.90 KB)
Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2014-2018 At-A-Glance (PDF - 446.27 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: August 2014

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or agency) is an independent agency established by the *Energy Reorganization Act of 1974* that began operations in 1975 as a successor to the Atomic Energy Commission. The agency's mission is to license and regulate the Nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to protect public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment. This strategic plan, covering the period 2014–2018, describes how the NRC plans to achieve its two strategic goals: (1) to ensure the safe use of radioactive materials and (2) to ensure the secure use of radioactive materials. The plan provides an overview of the NRC's responsibilities, describes how stakeholders participated in plan development, summarizes key challenges the agency will face during the planning period, and lays out the objectives, strategies, and key activities that will be used to achieve the agency's goals.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Yucca Mountain Review Plan (NUREG-1804, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download Complete Document
        - NUREG-1804, Revision 2 (PDF - 1.56 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2003**Date Published:**July 2003

**Prepared by:** Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, TX 78228-0510

Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

J.A. Ciocco, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Waste Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Yucca Mountain Review Plan provides guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff to evaluate a U.S. Department of Energy license application for a geologic repository. It is not a regulation and does not impose regulatory requirements. The licensing criteria are contained in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10, Part 63 (10 CFR Part 63), "Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada." The Secretary of Energy has recommended the Yucca Mountain site to the President for the development of a Yucca Mountain repository. The President has notified Congress that he considers the Yucca Mountain site qualified for application for a construction authorization for a repository. Nevada filed a notice of disapproval of the President's recommendation; however, Congress later approved the site recommendation. The U.S. Department of Energy may now submit a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The principal purpose of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan is to ensure the quality, uniformity, and consistency of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff reviews of the license application and any requested amendments. The Yucca Mountain Review Plan has separate sections for reviews of general information, repository safety before permanent closure, repository safety after permanent closure, the research and development program to resolve safety questions, the performance confirmation program, and administrative and programmatic requirements. Each section addresses determining compliance with specific regulatory requirements from 10 CFR Part 63. The regulations and the Yucca Mountain Review Plan are risk-informed, performance-based to the extent practical.

Draft Revision 2 of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan was made available for public comment in March 2002. This Final Revision 2 reflects revisions to address those comments, as appropriate.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 86-826.

#### Thomas et al. *v.*United States; Ivy *v.*United States; Smith *v.*United States; Thompson *v.*United States; Defibaugh *v.*United States; McCallum *v.*United States; Holmes *v.*United States; Schlote *v.*United States; and Shepherd *v.*United States.

Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 M. J. 388 (first case); 23 M. J. 153 (second case); 23 M. J. 163 (third case); 23 *1086M. J. 153 (fourth case); 23 M. J. 180 (fifth case); 23 M. J. 156 (sixth case); 23 M. J. 152 (seventh case); 23 M. J. 155 (eighth case); 23 M. J. 155 (ninth case).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Fire Barrier Penetration Seals in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-1552)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5 Analysis of Mitigation Strategy for Extended Blackout Power Condition in PWR (NUREG/IA-0467)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0467 (PDF - 9.82 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2015**Date Published:** May 2016

**Prepared by:** Andrej Prošek, Andrija Volkanovski

Jožef Stefan Institute Jamova cesta 39 Sl-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** Prepared as part of The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A set of measures have been proposed and currently implemented in response of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Those measures include diverse and flexible mitigation strategies that increase the defense-in-depth for beyond-design-basis scenarios. Mitigation strategies are based on the utilization of the portable equipment to provide power and water to the nuclear power plants in order to maintain or restore key safety functions. The verification of the proposed measures with the plant specific safety analyses is endorsed in the mitigation strategies. The purpose of the study was to investigate the application of the deterministic safety analysis for mitigation strategy of the extended station blackout (SBO). A methodology for the assessment of flowrates for steam generator makeup using portable pump is proposed. The aim is to fill steam generator without available information on level in such a way that makeup is sufficient and that at the same time the steam generators are not overfilled. The RELAP5/MOD3.3 computer code and input model of a two-loop pressurized water reactor is used for analyses, assuming different injection start times, flowrates and reactor coolant system losses. The calculated results show effectiveness of the proposed extended SBO mitigation strategy. The applicability of the developed method on operational power plant is validated.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of The  KingThomason
Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31,  2005 (the  "Report"),  I, T.E.  King III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 19, 2006


                                                        /s/ Thomas E. King III
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        T.E. King III
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


     The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
[641 NYS2d 540]

#### In the Matter of Ralph M. Gutstein, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

April 25, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Deborah A. Scalise*of counsel *(Hal R. Lieberman,*attorney), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Ralph M. Gutstein was admitted to the practice *331of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 19, 1978. At all relevant times, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the Committee) moves for an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), disbarring respondent on the ground that he has been suspended under the provisions of 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) for a period exceeding six months and has not appeared or applied in writing for a hearing or reinstatement. The Committee’s previous motion, which sought and obtained respondent’s suspension, contained the following notice: "please take further notice that pursuant to 22 N.Y.C.R.R. § 603.4 (g), an attorney who is suspended and who has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement for six months from the date of the order or suspension, may be disbarred without further notice.”

Accordingly, since respondent has neither appeared nor applied in writing, to the Committee or the Court, for a hearing or reinstatement, the Committee’s motion is granted, respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ., concur.

Motion granted, and respondent disbarred from the practice of law, effective April 25, 1996.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1948 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small bank holding 

company policy statement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mrs. LOVE (for herself and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small 

bank holding company policy statement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Bank Holding 

5 Company Relief Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1948 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHANGES REQUIRED TO SMALL BANK HOLDING 

2 COMPANY POLICY STATEMENT ON ASSESS3 MENT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGERIAL FAC4 TORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 6-month pe6 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

7 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

8 shall revise the Small Bank Holding Company Policy 

9 Statement on Assessment of Financial and Managerial 

10 Factors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C) to raise the 

11 consolidated asset threshold under such policy statement 

12 from $1,000,000,000 (as adjusted by Public Law 113– 

13 250) to $10,000,000,000. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (C) 

15 of section 171(b)(5) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re16 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

17 5371(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(C) any bank holding company or savings 

19 and loan holding company that is subject to the 

20 application of the Small Bank Holding Com21 pany Policy Statement on Assessment of Finan22 cial and Managerial Factors of the Board of 

23 Governors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C).’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:12 PM

To: 'Joe@skycammedia.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additioanl Information - SkyCam Media

Dear Mr. Doran:  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

1240).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).  

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed‐set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/8/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
No. 86-877.

#### United States *v.*Owens.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*and certiorari granted.