alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Maietta, Anthony

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:32 PM

To: Sutton, Lisa; Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Portanova, Mary; Blakley, Pamela

Subject: FW: Minnesota: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Anthony Maietta

EPA Region 5

maietta.anthony@epa.gov

(312) 353‐8777

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:30 PM

To: Portanova, Mary; Maietta, Anthony

Subject: FW: Minnesota: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:18 PM

To: 'Thornton, J. David (MPCA)'

Subject: Minnesota: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

David:

This message is a follow‐up to my recent phone call notifying you about the final action the EPA Administrator signed

today to ensure States have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is

operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are

treated in State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action,

EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 States, including Minnesota, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure

consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  You will have 18 months to submit revisions of

your State plan to EPA. Your revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.  

As part of our notification to your State about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the EPA’s

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action,

including the specific SIP provisions your State needs to address, we have posted a pre‐publication version of the

action on our website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.  

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible.  If you or

your staff have questions, please contact Mary Portanova, portanova.mary@epa.gov, (312) 353‐5954.
2

                                                                                                                                                                              

George  

Attachment
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Knowledge and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators: Boiling Water Reactors (NUREG-1123)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Ambassador Berry Meets with Prime Minister Oli to Discuss Biden Priorities 

U.S. Embassy in Nepal

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Multi-Mechanism Flood Hazard Assessment: Critical Review of Current Practice and Approaches and Example Use Studies (NUREG/CR-7296)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7196 (PDF – 22.59 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2022**Date Published:** October 2022**Prepared by:**Michelle Bensi, Somayeh MohammadiUniversity of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park, MD 20742Shih-Chieh Kao, Scott T. DeNealeOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak Ridge, TN 37831-6038Elena Yegorova, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Flooding of nuclear power plants and other infrastructure can occur because of events involving one or multiple coincident or correlated flood mechanisms. Existing approaches for probabilistic flood hazard assessment (PFHA) focus primarily on the occurrence of a single flood hazard mechanism. However, multi-mechanism flood (MMF) events may result in flooding with severity, duration, characteristics, and extent of impacts that differ from the effects of floods involving a single mechanism. Moreover, the estimated frequency of occurrence of flood severity metrics (e.g., flood elevation or depth) may change (increase) when considering the enhanced impacts of MMF events. Thus, to have a comprehensive estimate of flood hazards for our critical infrastructures, events involving both single and multiple flood mechanisms must be considered.

To extend the state of practice of MMF analysis, this study focuses on the identification of existing research and development of new methods to probabilistically assess hazards associated with MMF events. This research project is funded by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission PFHA Research Program with an intent to support the development of future guidance on PFHA. This report provides an overview of project research activities focusing on identification of existing approaches for probabilistically assessing MMF events and provides a critique and gap assessment of the current state of practice. It further discusses options for leveraging and extending approaches that show promise (with or without modifications) to support probabilistic assessment of MMF hazards associated with the range of return periods of relevance to nuclear power plants and other critical infrastructure. Two case studies are included to demonstrate the implementation of MMF methods in practice.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 17, 2022
No. 82-5823.

#### Lee *v.*New York.

Ct. App. N. Y. Cer-tiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1093

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHN J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property

and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

HARRY I. MOATZ, Director of Office of Enrollment and Discipline,

and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case no. 07-

CV-1719, Judge Richard W. Roberts.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish submits a brief in reply to the court's April 21, 2009

order. The court considers whether Cornish's submission should be treated as his reply

brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1)	Cornish's May 5, 2009 submission is treated as a reply brief.
(2)	A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to

decide this case.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 18 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk ustilaartor

cc:	Cornell D.M. Cornish

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

s17

MAY 1 8 2009

CLERK
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Shih-Jye Cheng, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 3, 2011



/s/ Shih-Jye ChengName:

Shih-Jye ChengTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6989

NATHANIEL SIMMONS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHARLES WILLIAMS; THOMAS ROBERTSON; ALYSON GLADWELL; STEPHANIE MARSHALL; STANLEY TERRY; CLARISSA JONES; JUANITA MOSS; BELL; MYERS; BEARD; WILLIE F. SMITH; SHERMAN L. ANDERSON; JENNIFER FRANKLIN; SHAKIRA WILLIAMS; MICHELLE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Michelle Chamber; TIM E. ROGERS; DEBORAH RICHTER; VICTORIA NORMAN; ASHLEY MADDOX; CYNTHIA DARDEN; KENNARD DUBOSE; BRYAN P. STIRLING , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 0:19

- cv
- 00317

- HMH )

Submitted : November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Nathaniel Simmons , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Simmons appeals the district court’s order s adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil action for failure
to state a clai m, denying his motion to amend , and denying h is Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Williams , No. 0:19

- cv
- 00317

- HMH (D.S.C. Ju ne 4 & 24, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1251 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-CE-044-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 91-6164.

#### Ortiz *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: August 7, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel Meetings

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two 
meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held by teleconference from the National Endowment for the 
Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW., Washington, DC 20506 as 
follows (all meetings are Eastern time and ending times are 
approximate):
    State & Regional (review of National Services Agreement): This 
meeting will be open.
    Dates: February 12, 2015 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    State & Regional (review of Regional Arts Organization Partnership 
Agreements): This meeting will be open.
    Dates: February 12, 2015 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    State & Regional (review of Regional Arts Organization Partnership 
Agreements): This meeting will be open.
    Dates: February 18, 2015 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Andi Mathis, Partnership 
Division National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98f5f9ecf0f1ebf9d8f9eaecebb6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97faf6e3fffee4f6d7f6e5e3e4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 202/682-5430.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015-01126 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 January 24, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010 July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010 and December 17, 2010 and January 10, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which the Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.                                       The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “February 7, 2011.”

 

2.                                       Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
PRECISION   OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By
    	
/s/   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Richard E. Forkey
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
SPECIAL   SITUATIONS PRIVATE EQUITY FUND, L.P.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   David Greenhouse
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   David Greenhouse
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   General Partner
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by BBC Graphics of Palm Beach, Inc. (the Company) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Druzak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  November 7, 2008 By:
        /s/ Robert Druzak
 Robert Druzak Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.