alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,763
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   765
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,636
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             820
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               820
<LOANS>                                         76,757
<ALLOWANCE>                                        495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,798
<DEPOSITS>                                      77,705
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,042
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                599
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              180
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 108,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,586
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  351
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,938
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 845
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,086
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              852
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       22
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    356
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         223
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       223
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.46
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       332
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   472
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  495
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               495
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# MACCS (MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System) (NUREG/BR-0527)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0527 (PDF – 4.70 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 2017

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

MACCS is a fully integrated, engineering-level severe accident consequence computer code developed to analyze the offsite consequences of a hypothetical release of radioactive material to the environment. Sandia National Laboratories developed the code for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) primarily as a probabilistic risk assessment tool. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUTHER J. MCLOYD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (4:94-cr-00070-BO-16)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther J. McLoyd, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luther J. McLoyd appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction 

in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and hold 

the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the 

relief McLoyd sought. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 

187 (4th Cir. 2010) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, 

we affirm the denial of McLoyd’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. See

United States v. McLoyd, No. 4:94–cr–00070–BO-16 (E.D.N.C. filed 

May 2, 2013 & entered May 3, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1832 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1832

  To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on 
              firearms safety or gun violence prevention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Kelly 
 of Illinois, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Speier, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Lee, Mr. Cohen, 
     Mr. Lynch, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Adams, Ms. Brownley of 
   California, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. 
 Blumenauer, and Ms. Tsongas) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on 
              firearms safety or gun violence prevention.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIREARMS SAFETY OR GUN 
              VIOLENCE PREVENTION.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 
through 2023 for the purpose of conducting or supporting research on 
firearms safety or gun violence prevention under the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be 
appropriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any other 
amounts authorized to be appropriated for such purpose.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Husker Ag, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 29, 2006.



|    |  |                                                                                                 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Fredrick J. Knievel                                                                         
|    |  | Fredrick J. Knievel, Chairman of the Board, President
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Robert E. Brummels                                                                          
|    |  | Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
Order entered February 26, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01440-CV 

JAMES KIRBY, ET AL., Appellants 

V. 

UNITED TOWS, L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06767 

ORDER 

We DENY as moot appellees’ December 10, 2014 motion to dismiss the appeal for lack 

of appellate jurisdiction. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - [Docket No. DEA-392]

# ACTION:

Notice of registration.

# SUMMARY:

Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. applied to be registered as a manufacturer of a basic class of controlled substance. The DEA grants Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of this controlled substance.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    By notice dated May 28, 2014, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 3, 2014, 79 FR 31985, Wildlife Laboratories, Inc., 1230 W. Ash Street, Suite D, Windsor, Colorado 80550, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of a certain basic class of controlled substance. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice.                

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. to manufacture the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history.

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of Carfentanil (9743), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to manufacture the above listed controlled substance for sale to veterinary pharmacies, zoos, and other animal and wildlife applications.

Dated: January 9, 2015.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2015-01294 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
No: I-19-009 April 15, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC to Meet with Connecticut Nuclear Energy Advisory Council

to Discuss 2018 Millstone Station Performance

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss 2018 safety performance of the Millstone 

nuclear power plant, operated by Dominion Nuclear, during a meeting of the Connecticut Nuclear 

Energy Advisory Council on April 24 in Waterford, Conn.

The NEAC meeting will be held at the Waterford Public Library, 49 Rope Ferry Road, from 

6-8 p.m. Following a presentation, NRC staff, including the resident inspectors based full-time at 

the site, will respond to questions from NEAC members and the public on plant performance and 

NRC’s oversight.

Both Millstone units operated safely during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection

findings and performance indicators were of very low safety significance (green). As a result, both 

units remain under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of 

inspection each year. 

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

At Millstone, inspections are performed by three NRC resident inspectors, and specialist 

inspectors from the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. 

The Millstone annual assessment letter, as well as the meeting notice, are available on the

NRC website. Current performance information for Millstone 2 and Millstone 3 is also available

and is updated quarterly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout: Australia, Japan, U.S. Trilateral Engagement

U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 86-735.

No. 86-736.

No. 86-942.

#### Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. *v.*Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.; Metropolitan Transportation Authority *v.*Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.; and Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission et al. *v.*Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 796 F. 2d 584.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 14, 2011


/s/ Joshua KazamJoshua KazamTitle: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.11


                  PROMISSORY NOTES TO AMBER TIGER HOLDINGS INC.
                       FROM CIROND NETWORKS (CANADA) INC.



<PAGE>

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$10,000.00                                              Date: August 31, 2005


For Value Received, the undersigned, Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc. At Suite
101B, 4185 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby promises to pay to the order of Amber
Tiger Holdings Inc. the principal amount of $10,000.00 together with interest at
2% per month.



/s/ Nicholas Miller                          /s/ Nicholas Miller
--------------------------                   -----------------------------------
Amber Tiger Holdings Inc.                    Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc.




<PAGE>

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$5,000.00                                               Date: Sept 15, 2005


For Value Received, the undersigned, Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc. At Suite
101B, 4185 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby promises to pay to the order of Amber
Tiger Holdings Inc. the principal amount of $5,000.00 together with interest at
2% per month.



/s/ Nicholas Miller                           /s/ Nicholas Miller
--------------------------                    ----------------------------------
Amber Tiger Holdings Inc.                     Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc.




<PAGE>


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$5,000.00                                             Date: October 31, 2005


For Value Received, the undersigned, Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc. At Suite
101B, 4185 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby promises to pay to the order of Amber
Tiger Holdings Inc. the principal amount of $5,000.00 together with interest at
2% per month.



/s/ Nicholas Miller                             /s/ Nicholas Miller
--------------------------                      --------------------------------
Amber Tiger Holdings Inc.                       Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc.




<PAGE>


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$7,500.00                                            Date: December 1, 2005


For Value Received, the undersigned, Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc. At Suite
101B, 4185 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby promises to pay to the order of Amber
Tiger Holdings Inc. the principal amount of $7,500.00 together with interest at
2% per month.



/s/ Nicholas Miller                            /s/ Nicholas Miller
--------------------------                     ---------------------------------
Amber Tiger Holdings Inc.                      Cirond Networks (Canada) Inc.
No: 19-026 June 18, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Completes Safety Review of Early Site Permit for Clinch River Nuclear Site

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its Final Safety Evaluation Report

for an Early Site Permit application from Tennessee Valley Authority for the Clinch River Nuclear 

Site. The report concludes there are no safety aspects that would preclude issuing the permit for the 

site, approximately five miles southwest of Oak Ridge, Tenn.

The approximately 600-page report describes the agency's review of the application, and 

incorporates comments from the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The NRC staff 

reviewed information on topics including:

• site seismology, geology, meteorology and hydrology;

• risks from potential accidents resulting from operation of a nuclear plant at the site; and

• the major features of the emergency plan TVA would implement if a reactor was built at the 

site.

The report also reviewed unique aspects of the application. These included requests for 

exemptions from some offsite emergency planning requirements, including the plume exposure 

pathway emergency planning zone, as well as a proposed plume exposure planning zone size 

methodology. A future reactor license applicant could use the sizing methodology to determine an 

appropriate planning zone for the application’s specific reactor type.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental 

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. TVA 

submitted the application on May 12, 2016. More information on the ESP process is available on 

the NRC website. 

The staff will provide the report on the application to the Commission for a mandatory 

hearing on the permit later this year. The staff issued its Environmental Impact Statement on the 

application in April 2019. The Commission will conduct the hearing to determine whether the 

staff’s review supports the findings necessary to issue the permit.
#### Douglass, Respondent, vs. Ransom, Appellant.

*March 4*

April 2, *1929.*

*446
      *Edwin B. Stillman,*attorney, and *Austin J. Baird,*of counsel, both of Waukesha, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Salen & Brenner*of Waukesha, and oral argument by *L. L. Brenner*and *Herman R. Salen.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The principal contention of the defendant here is that if the plaintiff found the title unsatisfactory he could do one of three things:

> “(a) Elect to perform the contract arid take a conveyance relying on the covenant in the deed as security against any defects in the title.

> “(b) Elect to refuse to perform the contract and receive back the earnest money.

> “(c) Elect to have an amount abated from the purchase price for the deficiency of title.”

The principal argument of the defendant is directed to the proposition that a court of equity will not require a de*447fendant to furnish a marketable title where it would be inequitable and unjust so to do. The difficulty with the defendant’s position in this case is that the defendant seeks to support her demurrer by anticipating possible defenses which might be urged upon the trial. It nowhere appears that the defendant cannot furnish a merchantable title. If she has a merchantable title or can make it by reasonable effort, the court may very properly require her to comply with the terms of her contract. The contract recites that $1,000 was paid down as earnest money. It is urged that the complaint does not allege that- it was not returned. This is a specious but untenable argument. There is a clear allegation in the com-, plaint that the earnest money was paid. If it was not paid, that fact may be shown upon the trial. It cannot be considered upon a demurrer to the complaint. If the plaintiff has asked for more relief than he is entitled to, that does not vitiate his complaint. *Williams v. Oconomowoc,*167 Wis. 281, 166 N. W. 322.

*By the Court.*— The order is affirmed.