alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 6 23

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRIST I

- EDINBURG

AMBER NICOLE SORENSO N

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24 th District Court

of Jackson County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justice s Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appell ant ’s counsel, W.A. White , has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as

c ounsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him to withdraw

because he has accepted an offer of employment as an Assistant District Attorney for

Calhoun County, T exas to begin February 3, 2020

.2

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State , 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.

-- Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

ap pointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appell ant ’s court

- appointed

attorney should remain as appell ant 's counsel; and, if not, whether appell ant is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appell ant ’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be

appointed, th e name, address, email address

, telephone number, and state bar number

of the newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The

trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to

be fi led with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of ten days from the date

of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 1 0th

d ay of January , 20 20

.
No. 91-6234.

#### Prior *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development,
Inc. ("PPD") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Date: November 13, 2002

                                       /s/ Fredric N. Eshelman
                                   ---------------------------------
                                         Fredric N. Eshelman
                                       Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# An Analysis of Operational Experience During Low Power and Shutdown and a Plan for Addressing Human Reliability Assessment Issues (NUREG/CR-6093, BNL-NUREG-52388)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6093 (PDF - 11.34 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 1994**Date Published:** June 1994

**Prepared by:**M. Barriere, W. Luckas, Brookhaven National LaboratoryD. Whitehead, Sandia National LaboratoriesA. Ramey-Smith, Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ContributorsD. Bley1, M. Donovan2, W. Brown3, J. Forester4, S. Cooper5, P. Haas6, J. Wreathall7, G. Parry2

Brookhaven National LaboratoryUpton, NY 11973-5000

Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, NM 87185

**Prepared for:**Division of Safety Issue ResolutionOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001NRC FIN L2415, Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC02--76CH00016NRC FIN L2539, Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC04-76DP00789

----

1PLG, Inc., Newport Beach, CA 926602HALLIBURTON NUS Environmental Corp., Gaithersburg, MD 208783Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 119734Science Applications International Corp., Albuquerque, NM 871065Science Applications International Corp., Reston, VA 220906Concord Associates, Inc., Knoxville, TN 379327John Wreathall & Co., Dublin, OH 43017

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Recent nuclear power plant events (e.g., Chernobyl, Diablo Canyon, and Vogtle) and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reports (e.g., NUREG-1449) have led to concerns regarding human reliability during low power and shutdown (LP&S) conditions and limitations of human reliability analysis (HRA) methodologies in adequately representing the LP&S environment. As a result of these concerns, the NRC initiated two parallel research projects to assess the influence of LP&S conditions on human reliability through an analysis of operational experience at pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs). These research projects, performed by Brookhaven National Laboratory for PWRs, and Sandia National Laboratories for BWRs, identified unique aspects of human performance during LP&S conditions and provided a program plan for research and development necessary to improve existing HRA methodologies. This report documents the results of the analysis of LP&S operating experience and describes the improved HRA program plan.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Ex. 99.4

                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In  connection  with the annual  report of  Stelmar  Shipping  Ltd.  (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.



/s/ Stamatis Molaris
--------------------
Stamatis Molaris

Chief Financial Officer







02509.0004 #409590
Exhibit 10

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 27, 2010

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Tim Carew, P.Geo., do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled June 2010 Summary Report on the Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated June 25, 2010 in the Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 23, 2010.

I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 23, 2010.

| | By: | /s/  Timothy Carew       
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     | Timothy Carew, P.Geo.    
| |     | Professional Geoscientist
| |     | Reserva International LLC
| |     |
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRadioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-2907)

# Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants: Annual Report 2018 (NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 24)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 24 (PDF – 1.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2020**Date Published:** November 2020

**Prepared by:**J. Davis

Oak Ridge Associated Universities1299 Bethel Valley Road, SC-200, MS-21Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Steven Garry and Micheal Smith, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In 2018, there were 98 commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) licensed to operate on 59 sites in the United States (U.S.) regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each year, each power reactor sends a report to the NRC that identifies the radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents discharged from the facility. In 2018, these effluent reports comprised about 10,000 pages of information, which described the radioactive materials discharged, as well as the resulting radiation doses to the general public. This report summarizes that information and presents the information in a format intended for both nuclear professionals and the general public.

The reader can use this report to quickly characterize the radioactive discharges from any U.S. NPP in 2018. The radioactive effluents from one reactor can be compared with other reactors. The results can also be compared with typical (or median) effluents for the industry, including short-term trends and long-term trends.

Reference information is included so the reader can compare the doses from NPP effluents with the doses that the general public receives from other sources of radiation, such as medical procedures, industrial devices, and naturally occurring radioactive materials in the environment.

Although all operating NPPs released some radioactive materials in 2018, all effluents discharged were within the NRC's and the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) public dose limits, and NRC's "as low as is reasonably achievable" (ALARA) criteria. Additionally, the doses from radioactive effluents were much less than the doses from other sources of natural radiation that are commonly considered safe. This indicates radioactive effluents from NPPs in 2018 had no significant impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffNUREG-1885

# Report to Congress on the Security Inspection Program for Commercial Power Reactors and Category I Fuel Cycle Facilities: Results and Status Update - Annual Report for Calendar Year 2013 (NUREG-1885, Revision 7)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1885, Revision 7 (PDF - 822.53 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2014**Date Published:** July 2014

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report fulfills the requirements of Section 170D.e of Chapter 14 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. §2201d.e) as amended, which states, “not less often than once each year, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report, in classified form and unclassified form, that describes the results of each security response evaluation conducted and any relevant corrective action taken by a licensee during the previous year.” This is the ninth annual report, which covers calendar year 2013. In addition to information on the security response evaluation program (force-on-force inspections), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing additional information regarding the overall security performance of the commercial nuclear power industry and Category I fuel cycle facilities to keep Congress and the public informed of the NRC’s efforts to protect public health and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment through the effective regulation of the Nation’s commercial nuclear power facilities and strategic special nuclear material.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2015067EN.01003203.xml

| 12.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/32

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/215 of 10 February 2015 on the putting into effect of the provisions of the Schengen acquis on data protection and on the provisional putting into effect of parts of the provisions of the Schengen acquis on the Schengen Information System for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

acquis

acquis

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 36 of 12 February 2015
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 36 of 12 February 2015

On page 8, recital 7:

for:

| ‘(7) | ... allowing those provisions and their subsequent developments to be provisionally put into effect for the United Kingdom.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(7)

... allowing those provisions and their subsequent developments to be provisionally put into effect for the United Kingdom.’

,

read:

| ‘(7) | ... allowing those provisions and their subsequent developments to be put into effect for the United Kingdom.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(7)

... allowing those provisions and their subsequent developments to be put into effect for the United Kingdom.’

.

---
No. 90-6207.

#### Under Seal *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Louis D’Amico, Assessment Manager

Preliminary Materials for 

the IRIS Assessment of 

Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro1,3,5-triazine (RDX)

Office of Research and Development

National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System December 12, 2013
1

General Information

RDX is a white crystalline solid, produced at Army munition plants and used as a 

military explosive. It is not found naturally in the environment.

In May 2012, RDX was listed as a chemical of concern at 31 of the 33 U.S. EPA 

National Priorities List (NPL) sites at which the chemical has been detected in 

surface water, groundwater, sediment, or soil.

RDX has been included in the Office of Water’s Drinking Water Contaminant 

Candidate Lists (CCL) since the initial listing was published in 1998. The presence 

of a chemical on the list suggests that it is known or anticipated to occur in public 

water systems.

Exposure

Individuals working at military facilities where RDX is produced or used may be 

exposed.

General population exposures may occur if individuals are in or around military

facilities where RDX is produced or used, or in drinking water that is contaminated 

with RDX.
2
3

Preliminary Materials for the IRIS Assessment of RDX:

• Draft literature search strategy

• Draft literature search results

• Preliminary evidence tables

• Preliminary exposure-response arrays 

*These materials are available online at: 

http://www.epa.gov/iris/publicmeeting/iris_bimonthly-dec2013/mtg_docs.htm
4

Literature Search Strategy

• The literature search identified 

more than 900 studies for RDX.

• 272 references are being 

considered for the assessment 

after an initial screen for 

relevance.

Data Extraction to Evidence 

Tables

• 20 references directly informing 

hazard identification are 

described in evidence tables.

20 studies in 

evidence tables
5

Features of the RDX Database

Chronic Subchronic

Two-Gen 

Repro/Dev

MOA

Information PBPK

Oral     

Inhalation

• Human data on exposures to RDX consist of case reports and 4 occupational 

studies. 
6

Endpoints with Data for 

Evaluating Hazard 

• Neurological Effects

• Mortality

• Reproductive and 

Developmental Effects

• Liver Effects

• Kidney Effects

• Cancer

• Other Systemic Effects

Scientific Considerations

• Male reproductive toxicity 

– Suppurative prostatitis in male rats 

• Carcinogenicity

– Evidence for RDX-related tumors in 

the liver and lungs of female mice

• PBPK modeling

– Evaluation of PBPK models for 

RDX in rats and mice
7

EPA welcomes all comments, such as:

• Clarity and transparency of materials

• Additional approaches for identifying studies

• Selection of studies for data extraction

• Study quality considerations

• Additional studies that may inform the assessment
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27402]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID: USAF-2024-HQ-0009]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
23, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: DoD National Defense 
Science and Engineering Graduate Program; OMB Control Number 0701-0154.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3,971.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,971.
    Average Burden per Response: 12 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 47,652.
    Needs and Uses: The National Defense Science and Engineering 
Graduate Fellowships program provides 3-year fellowships to students 
enrolled in Ph.D. programs of interest to DoD. Awards are under the 
authority of 10 U.S.C. 2191. The request for applications is necessary 
to screen applicants and to evaluate and select students to award 
fellowships.
    Information is used by the American Society for Engineering 
Education, the contractor selected to administer the program, to down 
select the eligible applicants by means of a peer review panel. The 
information is also used by scientists of the Air Force, Army, and 
Navy, to make the final selection of awardees.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: November 19, 2024.
Stephanie J. Bost,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liason Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-27402 Filed 11-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40225

LARRY MICHAEL MAPLES ,
Petitioner

- Appellant

v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:17

- CV

- 560

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry Michael Maples, Texas prisoner # 1965775 , moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application challenging his conviction of capital murder. He contends that the district court erred by dismissing on the merits and without holding an evidentiary hearing on claims that (1) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by ( a ) failing to hire a ballistics expert or a medical expert and (b ) advising Maples

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court ha s determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 21, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40225 Document: 00515424912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/21/2020No. 19

- 40225

2 not to testify at trial, and (2) his trial and app ellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to mount a defense based on sudden passion. To obtain a COA with respect to the denial of a § 2254 application, a prisoner must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 483 (2000). If a district court has rejected a claim on its merits, the petitioner “must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack , 529 U.S. at 484. Maples fails to make the necessary showing. To the extent that he requests a COA regarding the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing, we construe his motion as a direct appeal of that issue, see Norman v. Stephens , 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm

. S ee Cullen v. Pinholster , 563 U.S. 170, 185

- 86 (2011). Accordingly, Maples ’s motion for a COA is DENIED, and the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-40225 Document: 00515424912 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/21/2020
ex10_4-f8k10102010.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 

 


LOAN AGREEMENT







Party A                      :           China INSOnline Corp.


Party B                      :           Liu Lu (刘璐)(Identity Card no.:130203197805150323)


 


 


Whereas Party A demand for operating cashflow and borrow a loan from Party B, both Party A and Party B agree the terms as below:


 


1.              Loan amount: USD One Hundred Thousand for settlement of legal fee.


 


    2.              Loan interest:  Annual rate at 3%, from the date of borrowing to repayment, both days inclusive.  For interest calculation, there is 360 days per year.  Loan interest is payable on the repayment of loan.


 


3.              Repayment:  On or before December 31, 2010.  If Party A could not repay in cash, Party B has right to request the same value of stock issued by Party A.  Any delay repayment is subject to late charges of 0.1% per day.




 


4.              This Agreement in duplicate and each party has one.


 







 



	
Party A:


 

	  	
Party B:


	
China INSOnline Corp.

	  	
Liu Lu (刘璐)


	
  


 


 

	  	  
	
/s/Wang Zhenyu


 

	  	
/s/ Liu Lu


	
October 16, 2010

	  	
October 16, 2010
No. 86-827.

#### Jain *v.*ITT Grinnell Corp.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.