4538 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 

non-market economy entity will not be under 

review unless a party specifically requests, or the 

Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. 

Because no party requested a review of the entity, 

the entity is not under review and the entity’s rate 

is not subject to change. 

11See Implementation of Determinations Under 

Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular 

Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated 

Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 

and Tube From the People’s Republic of China, 77 

FR 52683, 52688 (August 30, 2012). 

12See also 19 CFR 351.303 for filing 

requirements. 

13For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011) (‘‘NME Assessment 2011’’). 

14 Id. 

established for the PRC-wide entity in 

this proceeding is 47.64 percent.11

Public Comment 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results 

and submit written arguments or case 

briefs within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

otherwise notified by the Department 

(see 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii)). Parties are 

reminded that they should not submit 

new factual information in written 

arguments or case briefs. Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs, will be due five days later (see 19 

CFR 351.309(d)). Parties who submit 

case or rebuttal briefs are requested to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; and (2) a brief 

summary of the argument. Parties are 

also requested to provide a summary of 

the arguments not to exceed five pages 

and a table of statutes, regulations, and 

cases cited (see 19 CFR 351.309).12

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, filed 

electronically using ACCESS (see 19 

CFR 351.310(c)). An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by the Department’s 

electronic records system, ACCESS, by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. Requests should contain the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number, the number of participants, and 

a list of the issues to be discussed. If a 

request for a hearing is made, the 

Department will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing which 

will be held at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at 

a time and location to be determined. 

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

date, time, and location of the hearing. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of our 

analysis of issues raised in the written 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register (see section 

751(a)(3)(A) and the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1)). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review (see 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1)). The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

review. For the final results, if we 

continue to treat the nine companies 

upon which the review was initiated as 

part of the PRC-wide entity, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 47.64 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were produced and/or 

exported by those companies. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases.13

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported by 

companies examined during this 

review, the Department will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

NME-wide rate.14

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by 

sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate 

(including those companies identified 

above upon which this review was 

initiated), the cash deposit rate will be 

that for the PRC-wide entity; and (3) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to the importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of Methodology 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–01588 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–704] 

Brass Sheet and Strip From Japan: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on brass sheet 

and strip from Japan for the period of 

review August 1, 2013, through July 31, 

2014, based on the timely withdrawal of 

the request for review. 

DATES: Effective January 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 4539 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 44740 

(August 1, 2014). 

2See Letter from the petitioners to the 

Department, dated August 27, 2014, at 1–2. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

58729 (September 30, 2014). 

4See Letter from the petitioners, dated December 

16, 2014, at 2. 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 43391 (July 25, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2012–2013 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Phone Call with 

Counsel for Kangtai,’’ (July 30, 2014), denying 

Kangtai’s request for an additional questionnaire 

Continued 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1785. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2014, the Department 

published the notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on brass sheet 

and strip from Japan for the period of 

review August 1, 2013, through July 31, 

2014.1 On August 27, 2014, Global Brass 

and Copper Holdings, Inc., dba Olin 

Brass, Heyco Metals, Inc., Aurubis 

Buffalo, Inc., PMX Industries, Inc., and 

Revere Copper Products, Inc. 

(collectively, the petitioners) requested 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of the following 

22 exporters/producers: (1) Dowa Metals 

& Mining Co., Ltd.; (2) Fujisawa Co., 

Ltd.; (3) Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Harada Metal Industry; (5) Hitachi 

Alloy, Ltd., (6) Hitachi Cable, Ltd.; (7) 

JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corp.; (8) 

Kicho Shindosho Co., Ltd.; (9) Kitz 

Metal Works Corp.; (10) Kobe Steel, 

Ltd.; (11) Mitsubishi Electric Metecs 

Co., Ltd.; (12) Mitsubishi Materials 

Corp.; (13) Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., 

Ltd.; (14) Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., 

Ltd. (Mitsui Kinzoku); (15) Mitsui 

Sumitomo Metal Mining Brass & Copper 

Co., Ltd.; (16) NGK Insulators (NGK 

Metals); (17) Ohki Brass & Copper Co., 

Ltd.; (18) Sambo Copper Alloy Co., Ld.; 

(19) Sugino Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; 

(20) Sumitomo Metal Mining Brass & 

Copper Co., Ltd.; (21) Uji Copper & 

Alloy Co., Ltd.; and (22) YKK 

Corporation.2 Pursuant to this request, 

and in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department 

published a notice initiating an 

administrative review of the abovementioned companies.3 The petitioners 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review of all 22 

exporters/producers on December 16, 

2014.4

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the 

publication date of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. As 

noted above, the petitioners withdrew 

their request for review of the 22 

exporters/producers within 90 days of 

the publication date of the notice of 

initiation. No other parties requested an 

administrative review of the order. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review in its entirety. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of brass sheet and 

strip from Japan. Antidumping duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

rescission of administrative review. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under an APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01597 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 25, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

chlorinated isocyanurates (chloro isos) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC).1 The period of review (POR) is 

June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2013. 

This review covers five producers/

exporters: (1) Arch Chemicals (China) 

Co. Ltd. (Arch China); (2) Hebei Jiheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd.(Jiheng); (3) Heze 

Huayi Chemical Co. Ltd. (Heze); (4) 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Kangtai); and (5) Zhucheng Taisheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Zhucheng). Jiheng 

and Kangtai are the two producers/

exporters being individually examined 

as mandatory respondents. We invited 

parties to comment on our Preliminary 

Results. Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made certain 

changes to our margin calculations for 

Jiheng and Kangtai. The final dumping 

margins for this review are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Cary, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3964 or (202) 482–0176, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 25, 2014, the Department 

published its Preliminary Results. On 

July 30, 2014, the Department extended 

the deadline for the filing of case and 

rebuttal briefs.2 On September 8 and 9, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES