alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stanton M. Cagney, Respondent, v Evelyne J. Blaikie, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 514]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 3, 1994, *484which, upon a verdict on the issue of damages only, awarded plaintiff $350,000 for past pain and suffering and $805,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, to the extent of vacating the judgment in favor of plaintiff and ordering a new trial on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to reductions of the awards for past pain and suffering to $230,000 and for future pain and suffering to $520,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, in which case the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed.

The award for past and future pain and suffering materially deviates from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]) and we reduce it accordingly. We have considered the defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Approves Transfer of Pilgrim Plant Operating License from Boston Edison to Entergy Nuclear

----

----

No. 99-93 May 3, 1999

**NRC APPROVES TRANSFER OF PILGRIM PLANT OPERATING LICENSE FROM BOSTON EDISON TO ENTERGY NUCLEAR**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the transfer of the operating license for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station near Plymouth, Mass., from Boston Edison Co. to Entergy Nuclear Generation Co.

Entergy Nuclear is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Corp. of New Orleans. Boston Edison is a wholly owned subsidiary of BEC Energy, a Massachusetts business trust with headquarters in Boston. The two companies applied for the license transfer in December after reaching agreement for Entergy Nuclear to buy the Pilgrim plant.

The NRC order consenting to the transfer requires that Entergy Nuclear provide and maintain a decommissioning fund for the plant of at least $396 million. Entergy Nuclear must further provide a special trust fund of $70 million, primarily to pay any taxes which may be due as the result of the decommissioning fund transfer from Boston Edison.

In addition, Entergy Nuclear is required to have access to a contingency fund of at least $50 million. This money is to be available, if needed, to pay Pilgrim operating and maintenance expenses, and costs to transition to a decommissioning status if the unit is permanently shut down, as well as the decommissioning costs themselves. The order also requires that Entergy Nuclear obtain the required amount of insurance to cover public liability claims in case of a severe nuclear accident.

During its review of the Entergy Nuclear application, the NRC staff considered comments filed by municipalities which purchase power from Pilgrim and by Citizens Urging Responsible Energy. In response to a Federal Register notice concerning the proposed license transfer, the NRC received requests for a hearing from the Massachusetts attorney general and two labor unions which represent workers at Pilgrim. Both requests were later withdrawn.

The Order has been posted on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Rim of the Pacific 2020 Participants Conduct Sinking Exercise

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Lawrence D. Flowers, Plaintiff, v KG Land New York Corporation et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. LaQuila Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 257]

Motion by the appellants on appeals from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 21, 1993, and (2) an order of the same court, dated March 11, 1994, to strike all portions of the respondent’s brief which refer to documents not contained in the record on appeal from the order and judgment. By decision and order dated October 7, 1994, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Bench that determined the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic.

The documents at issue were part of the record on appeal from the order dated March 11, 1994, and therefore were properly before the court. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.
Amendment to Index License Agreement for Funds, dated as of October 27, 2009



 Exhibit 10.15 
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT GRANTED. *********** INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN GRANTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

 AMENDMENT 

Date of Amendment: October 27, 2009 
 AMENDMENT to the Index License Agreement for Funds (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 18, 2000, by and between MSCI Inc. (f/k/a/ Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc.)
(“MSCI”) and Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (“Licensee”), as previously amended. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Agreement. 

 

	1.	Exhibit A of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the MSCI *********** Index, MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI *********** Index and MSCI USA Minimum
Volatility Index. 

 For the avoidance of doubt, the license fees set forth in the Agreement, as amended, shall
apply with respect to all Funds based on the MSCI *********** Index, MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI *********** Index and MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. 
  

	 	•	 	 The *********** per Fund. The *********** per Fund. 


  


	2.	This Amendment is intended to amend and operate in conjunction with the Agreement and together this Amendment and the Agreement constitute the complete and exclusive
statement of the agreement between the parties and supersede in full all prior proposals and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. To the extent that any terms of this Amendment conflict with any terms of the
Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will control. No right or license of any kind is granted to Licensee except as expressly provided in the Agreement or this Amendment. 


 

	3.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict or choice of laws principles.


  

									
	LICENSEE: Barclays Global Investors	 		 	MSCI Inc.
					
	By	 	   /s/ Greg Friedman
	 		 	By	 	   /s/ Paul Friedman

					
	Name	 	   Greg Friedman
	 		 	Name	 	   Paul Friedman

		 	  (printed)	 		 		 	  (printed)
					
	Title	 	   Managing Director
	 		 	Title	 	   Vice President

				
	LICENSEE: Barclays Global Investors	 		 		 	
					
	By	 	   /s/ Elaine Orr
	 		 		 	
					
	Name	 	   Elaine Orr
	 		 		 	
		 	  (printed)	 		 		 	
					
	Title	 	   Principal
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# 25th Annual NRC Water Reactor Safety Meeting to Be Held October 20-22 in Bethesda, MD

----

----

No. 97-124

August 26, 1997

25TH ANNUAL NRC WATER REACTOR SAFETY MEETING TO BE HELD OCTOBER 20-22 IN BETHESDA, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 25th annual Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting, featuring presentations and discussions on a number of leading technical topics, will be held October 20-22 at the Bethesda, Md., Marriott Hotel.

Participants will include representatives from the NRC, U.S. government laboratories, private contractors, universities, the Electric Power Research Institute, reactor vendors, and a number of foreign agencies.

NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will deliver the keynote speech at 9:00 a.m. Monday, October 20, at the opening plenary session. A panel discussion on risk-informed regulation will be held on Tuesday at 8:30 a.m. Dr. Herbert J.C. Kouts, a member of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, will speak after lunch on Wednesday.

During the three-day meeting, presentations will be made in 12 technical areas - pressure vessel research, boiling water reactor strainer blockage and other generic safety issues; environmentally assisted degradation of light water reactor components; update on severe accident code improvements and applications; human reliability analysis and human performance evaluation; technical isues related to rulemakings; risk-informed, performance-based initiatives; high burnup fuel; thermal-hydraulic research and codes (two sessions); digital instrumentation; and control and structural performance.

Those wishing to attend are asked to register with the meeting coordinator, Susan Monteleone of Brookhaven National Laboratory, Building 130, Upton, N.Y., 11973. The telephone number is (516) 344-7235; or Christine Bonsby, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, telephone (301) 415-5838.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2019-1





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of May 30, 2019 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 25 th day of March, 2022.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 2, 2010 

0330 

Order 

 

April 2, 2010 

139310 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139310 

 COA: 290746 

Wayne CC: 92-004271; 

WILMOT MOORE, 92-004272; 92-004273 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

 HATHAWAY, J. (not participating). In his application, defendant alleges 

ineffective assistance of trial counsel. I will not be participating in this case because I 

have a close personal relationship with defendant’s trial counsel and his family.
#### J. H. WILSON, Jr., and wife v. O. J. LINEBERGER.

*Rehearing.*

Applications for a rehearing under Rule 12, 8£T N. G., 606, are based only upon alleged errors in law and newly discovered evidence, and, therefore, such proceeding is not the proper mode of asserting a claim to uncollected assets not included in the former account of the party to be charged.

PjdtitioN by plaintiffs to rehear filed November 12th, 1883, and heard at February Term, 1884, of The Supreme Court.

*181*Messrs. Wilson*<fe Son, for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Jones & Johnston*and *N. Dumont,*for defendant.

SMITH, C. J.

The error assigned consists in onr overlooking the evidence of the solvency of L. A. Mason, a debtor to the partnership, against whom judgments had been recovered, furnished in his returns of taxable property, when passing upon the defendant’s responsibility for the entire indebtedness, which, if well founded, cannot be corrected in this method of proceeding. Applications for a rehearing are confined to alleged errors in law, or are sustained on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Rule 12, 89 N. C., 606.

In the former opinion (88 N. C., 416), the defendant was to be held liable for so much only of the judgments against this debtor as had been collected by the defendant, and of course exonerating him from personal accountability for the residue, since it did not appear that any detriment had come to the firm ■from the omission to collect that. The fund did not thereby become his, but continued to belong to the firm as before, and future collections made would inure to the common benefit of all the partners. We merely determined that the defendant should not *then*and in that account be charged with uncollected sums still due, having reference to the time of the rendering the account by the commissioner.

The judgment disposes of the defendant’s administration of copartnership matters and his personal accountability for the results of acts and omissions entailing loss or harm to the associate members, but leaves the uncollected assets, from which moneys might' thereaftor be realized, to be distributed among them. Our ruling is that which ought to have been made by the judge and originally by the commissioner, upon the facts then existing and the evidence before him.

There is no obstacle to a further accounting for moneys of the firm subsequently collected by the defendant and for which he has not been already made responsible, but the present is not the appropriate mode of reaching them.

*182The decree heretofore made will, if necessary, be so modified as not to conclude the plaintiffs, from asserting their claims to such further moneys derived from the partnership resources and not included in the account, as may have come or may come into the hands of the defendant. In all other respects the judgment must be affirmed.

Modified.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 04 12 IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF: T.A., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 27, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court December 17 2020

12/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0412
Argued and submitted January 29,

affirmed July 7,

reconsideration denied September 15,

petition for review denied October 26, 1993 (318 Or 26)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*LEONARD LEE LEWIS, *Appellant.*

(90-07-33549; CA A72528)

854 P2d 1009

Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

*495DEITS, P. J.

*496DEITS, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for two counts of dealing in depictions of sexual conduct involving a child, ORS 163.673, and the conditions of probation imposed as a result of the convictions. We affirm.

Defendant was found to have developed and possessed with intent to print a photograph of a child in an act of “sexually explicit conduct,” which ORS 163.665(2)(f) defines as “[l]ewd exhibition of the genitals or anus.” Although he did not demur to the indictment, defendant here contends that the statutes under which he was convicted are unconstitutional and that we should reach the error as apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 5.45(2). Specifically, defendant claims that the statutes are void for vagueness and over-breadth. The same issue was decided adversely to defendant in *State v. Meyer,*120 Or App 319, 852 P2d 879 (1993).

Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in imposing special conditions of probation relating to pedophile offenders. Defendant’s probation was revoked on March 19, 1992, for his failure to comply with the terms of probation. He was sentenced to 84 days in the county jail. The state appealed the trial court’s disposition of defendant’s sentence after the court revoked probation. In that appeal, we held that, after revoking probation, the trial court erred in failing to sentence defendant to a prison term pursuant to OAR 253-10-002; we remanded for resentencing. *State v. Lewis,*119 Or App 362, 850 P2d 409, *rev den*317 Or 163 (1993). Accordingly, the conditions of defendant’s probation are no longer at issue, and his claim of error is moot.

Affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldier Voluntarily Teach English and Learn Japanese: Win-win Opportunity

By Noriko KudoU.S. Army Garrison Japan Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNMSS Procedures

# NMSS Rescinded Procedures (RP)

**Note:** The Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) merged with NMSS on October 5, 2014. All previously issued FSME and Office of State and Tribal Program (STP) procedures are considered effectively NMSS procedures and remain in effect until they are reviewed and reissued. These procedures can be referenced as NMSS procedures even though the procedures still have FSME or STP titles and references.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 15, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Background Procedures
          - State Agreement Procedures
          - State Liaison Procedures
          - Administrative Support Procedures
          - Temporary Instructions
          - Tribal Procedures
          - Management Directives (select)
          - Rescinded Procedures

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 15, 2023
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities (NUREG-1496)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021