3880 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

1Standards for Business Practices and 

Communication Protocols for Public Utilities, 148 

FERC ¶ 61,205 (2014). 

2For example, in Docket Nos. RM05–5–024 and 

ER15–550–000, the New York Independent System 

Operator, Inc., has requested a time extension for 

compliance with the NAESB standards involving 

Public Key Infrastructure (WEQ–012) to allow a 24 

month compliance schedule. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

19, 2014. 

John Duncan, 

Director, Flight Standards Service. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 

CFR part 97) is amended by 

establishing, amending, suspending, or 

removing Standard Instrument 

Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle Departure 

Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the 

dates specified, as follows: 

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT 

APPROACH PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 97 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 

40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 

44719, 44721–44722. 

■ 2. Part 97 is amended to read as 

follows: 

Effective 5 February 2015 

Montauk, NY, Montauk, VOR RWY 6, Amdt 

4 

Cleveland, OH, Cuyahoga County, LOC/DME 

BC RWY 6, Amdt 13, CANCELED 

Waverly, OH, Pike County, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 7, Amdt 1 

Waverly, OH, Pike County, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 25, Amdt 1 

Waverly, OH, Pike County, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 

Effective 5 March 2015 

Napaskiak, AK, Napaskiak, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig 

Mammoth Lakes, CA, Mammoth Yosemite, 

NIKOL ONE, GRAPHIC DP 

Mammoth Lakes, CA, Mammoth Yosemite, 

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 

2 

Oakland, CA, Metropolitan Oakland Intl, ILS 

OR LOC RWY 12, ILS RWY 12 (SA CAT 

I), Amdt 8 

Effingham, IL, Effingham County Memorial, 

LOC RWY 29, Amdt 1E, CANCELED 

Alexandria, IN, Alexandria, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig, 

CANCELED 

Alexandria, IN, Alexandria, VOR OR GPS 

RWY 27, Amdt 8A, CANCELED 

Murray, KY, Kyle-Oakley Field, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 5, Amdt 1 

Murray, KY, Kyle-Oakley Field, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 23, Amdt 1 

De Quincy, LA, De Quincy Industrial 

Airpark, NDB RWY 15, Amdt 2, 

CANCELED 

De Quincy, LA, De Quincy Industrial 

Airpark, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 2 

De Quincy, LA, De Quincy Industrial 

Airpark, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Amdt 2 

De Quincy, LA, De Quincy Industrial 

Airpark, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle 

DP, Amdt 1 

De Quincy, LA, De Quincy Industrial 

Airpark, VOR/DME RWY 34, Amdt 3 

Muskegon, MI, Muskegon County, VOR/DME 

RWY 6, Amdt 11A, CANCELED 

Duluth, MN, Duluth Intl, RADAR–1, Amdt 

20A, CANCELED 

Cameron, MO, Cameron Memorial, NDB 

RWY 35, Amdt 3, CANCELED 

Loup City, NE., Loup City Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 16, Orig 

Loup City, NE., Loup City Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 34, Orig 

Van Wert, OH, Van Wert County, NDB RWY 

9, Amdt 3A, CANCELED 

Georgetown, TX, Georgetown Muni, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 

Greenville, TX, Majors, LOC BC RWY 35, 

Amdt 1B, CANCELED 

Houston, TX, William P. Hobby, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6A 

Lago Vista, TX, Lago Vista TX—Rusty Allen, 

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 

1 

Lakeway, TX, Lakeway Airpark, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3 

Lamesa, TX, Lamesa Muni, NDB RWY 16, 

Amdt 3, CANCELED 

Lamesa, TX, Lamesa Muni, NDB RWY 34, 

Amdt 4, CANCELED 

Levelland, TX, Levelland Muni, NDB RWY 

17, Amdt 3, CANCELED 

Levelland, TX, Levelland Muni, NDB RWY 

35, Amdt 2, CANCELED 

Taylor, TX, Taylor Muni, Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 

Blacksburg, VA, Virginia Tech/Montgomery 

Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Amdt 2 

[FR Doc. 2015–01028 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Parts 2 and 38 

[Docket No. RM05–5–024; Order No. 676– 

H] 

Standards for Business Practices and 

Communication Protocols for Public 

Utilities 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Final rule; notice of extension 

of time. 

SUMMARY: Order No. 676–H, published 

on September 14, 2014, requires public 

utilities to comply with the 

incorporated Version 003 business 

practice standards by February 2, 2015 

(former), with the exception of those 

standards related to the Network 

Integration Transmission Service (NITS) 

Open Access Same-Time Information 

System (OASIS) template, for which 

compliance is required by April 25, 

2016 (latter). This document extends the 

afore-mentioned deadline to comply 

with requirements not related to the 

NITS OASIS template from February 2, 

2015 to and including May 15, 2015. 

DATES: Effective date: This rule is 

effective January 26, 2015. 

Compliance date: Compliance with 

the Version 003 business practice 

standards not related to the NITS OASIS 

template, published in the rule of 

September 14, 2014 (79 FR 56939), is 

extended to and including May 15, 

2015, for all entities subject to the 

requirement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tony Dobbins (Technical Issues), Office 

of Energy Policy and Innovation, 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502– 

6630 

Gary D. Cohen (Legal Issues), Office of 

the General Counsel, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, 888 First 

Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

(202) 502–8321 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Order 

No. 676–H, the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (Commission) 

amended its regulations to incorporate 

by reference, with certain enumerated 

exceptions, the latest version (Version 

003) of the Standards for Business 

Practices and Communication Protocols 

for Public Utilities adopted by the 

Wholesale Electric Quadrant (WEQ) of 

the North American Energy Standards 

Board (NAESB) as mandatory 

enforceable requirements.1 Order No. 

676–H requires public utilities to 

comply with the incorporated Version 

003 business practice standards by 

February 2, 2015, with the exception of 

those standards related to the NITS 

OASIS template, for which compliance 

is required by April 25, 2016. Several 

entities have requested a time extension 

for compliance with the February 2, 

2015 implementation date. 

Upon consideration of these requests 

for extension of time, the Commission 

will extend the requirement for 

compliance with the Version 003 

business practice standards not related 

to the NITS OASIS template to and 

including May 15, 2015, for all entities 

subject to these requirements. All other 

compliance obligations set forth in 

Order No. 676–H remain in force. We 

will consider further requests for 

extension for particular standards in 

future orders.2


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 3881 

Dated: January 15, 2015. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01141 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket Number USCG–2014–0657] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulation; Clearwater 

Super Boat National Championship; 

Gulf of Mexico, Clearwater, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a special local regulation on 

the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the 

vicinity of Clearwater Beach, Florida 

during the Clearwater Super Boat 

National Championship. The race is 

scheduled to take place annually on the 

last Saturday and Sunday of September 

from approximately 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The special local regulation is necessary 

to protect the safety of race participants, 

participant vessels, spectators, and the 

general public on the navigable waters 

of the United States during the event. 

The special local regulation will restrict 

vessel traffic in the waters of the Gulf of 

Mexico in the vicinity of Clearwater, 

Florida. It will establish the following 

three areas: A race area, where all 

persons and vessels, except those 

persons and vessels participating in the 

high speed boat races, are prohibited 

from entering, transiting through, 

anchoring in, or remaining within; a 

spectator area, where all vessels must be 

anchored or operate at No Wake Speed; 

and an enforcement area where 

designated representatives may control 

vessel traffic as determined by the 

prevailing conditions. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 1, 

2015. This rule will be enforced 

annually on the last weekend in 

September from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT. 

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in 

this preamble are part of docket USCG– 

2014–0657. To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http://

www.regulations.gov, type the docket 

number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Marine Science Technician First 

Class Hector I. Fuentes, Sector Saint 

Petersburg Waterways Management 

Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 

(813) 228–2191, email 

Hector.I.Fuentes@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Barbara 

Hairston, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Regulatory History and Information 

The Coast Guard is establishing this 

Special Local Regulation on the waters 

of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of 

Clearwater Beach, Florida during the 

Clearwater Super Boat National 

Championship. On September 10, 2014, 

the Coast Guard published a notice 

proposing this final rule. One comment 

was received in favor of this regulation. 

The race is scheduled to take place 

annually from approximately 10 a.m. to 

5 p.m. during the last Saturday and 

Sunday of September. This rule is 

necessary to protect the safety of race 

participants, participant vessels, 

spectators, and the general public on the 

navigable waters of the United States 

during the event. 

B. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the rule is the 

Coast Guard’s authority to establish 

special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 

1233. 

The purpose of the rule is to provide 

for the safety of life on navigable waters 

of the United States during the 

Clearwater Super Boat National 

Championship. 

C. Comments, Changes and the Final 

Rule 

The Coast Guard received one 

comment related to this event during 

the comment period and there was no 

request for a public meeting made 

during the comment period. The one 

comment received was in support of the 

regulation. 

D. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 

or under section 1 of Executive Order 

13563. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under those 

Orders. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

the impact of this rule on small entities. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will 

not retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this rule or 

any policy or action of the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES