alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J. S11031/19 

### NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
PENNYMAC CORP. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LUN DES GARRETT, No. 1553 EDA 2018 Appellant 

### Appeal from the Order, April 23, 2018, in the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County Civil Division at No. 8505 -CV -2016
BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., MURRAY, J., AND FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: 

### FILED JULY 16, 2019 Lundes Garrett appeals from the April 23, 2018 order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County denying the following: (1) 

### Defendant June Garrett's Petition to Strike Summary Judgment and Sheriff's Sale; (2) Defendant 

### June Garrett's Petition to Intervene, Stay, and Set Aside Writ of Possession as to Non -Judgment Debtor Property; (3) Defendants Lundes Garrett and June Garrett's Petiton to Open and/or Strike Summary 

### Judgment and Sheriff's sale, and New Matter; and (4) Defendant Lundes Garrett's Motion for Reconsideration. 

### Trial court statement, 7/13/18 at 1 n.1. For the following reasons, we dismiss appellant's appeal. 

### The record

### reflects that following the entering of the trialcourt's 

### April 23, 2018 order, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal to this court on 

### May 21, 2018. On May 25, 2018, the trial court ordered appellant to file aJ. S11031/19
concise 

### statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). 

### Appellant timely complied on June 12, 2018. The trial court filed a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) on July 13, 2018. 

### In the present appeal, appellant raises 15 issues for our review. (See 

### appellant's brief at 12-14.) Appellant devotes a majority of his argument to assail the mortgage foreclosure executed on the property at issue-a matter 

### that has already been litigated before, and adjudicated by this court. See 

### .7P Morgan Chase Bank v.

### Garrett, 105 A.3d 791 (Pa.Super. 2014) (unpublished memorandum). 

### We will not allocate any additional further judicial time or resources for appellant to continue to repeat arguments that have already been addressed by this court. 

### Additionally, we bar appellant 

### from continuing to raise either the same or related claims without leave of court. Pa.R.Civ.P. 233.1(c). 

### We, therefore, dismiss appellant's appeal without prejudice to appellee 

### to seek relief from the trial court relating to costs incurred in defending this appeal. Appeal dismissed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Prothonotary 

### Date: 7/16/19


## -2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00185-CR

GORDON RAY LEWIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District 

Court

of Hood County (CR12234)

March 21, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Concurring Memorandum Opinion by 

Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41579 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ERNESTO ROJAS

- MACIAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15

- CR

- 1489

- 1

Before JOLLY , HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto Rojas

Macias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas

- Macias h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41579 Document: 00514121875 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 41579

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41579 Document: 00514121875 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
# C_2015345EN.01000101.xml

| 18.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/1

---

COUNCIL DECLARATION

(2015/C 345/01)

The Council notes that the commitment to lift all EU nuclear-related sanctions in accordance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is without prejudice to the dispute resolution mechanism specified in the JCPOA and to the reintroduction of EU sanctions in case of significant non-performance by Iran of its commitments under the JCPOA.

The Council commits to reintroduce without delay all EU nuclear-related sanctions that have been suspended and/or terminated in case of significant non-performance by Iran of its commitments under the JCPOA upon joint recommendation to the Council by the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

---
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, that:
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen N. Joffe /s/ Alan Buckey Stephen N. Joffe Alan BuckeyChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DALEEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          36,363
<SECURITIES>                                     3,376
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,572
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,842
<PP&E>                                          12,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,838
<SALES>                                         20,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,444
<CGS>                                            6,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,507)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,507)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.81)


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALE R. STEIN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

G. WOODS, DDS; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16968

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-01243-JSW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Dale R. Stein, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious dental needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

FILED

FEB 2 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Stein failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his dental problems and associated pain. See id. at 1057-

58 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and

disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety; negligence and a

mere difference in medical opinion are insufficient); Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d

330, 332 (9th Cir. 1996) (to establish that a difference of opinion amounted to

deliberate indifference, a prisoner “must show that the course of treatment the

doctors chose was medically unacceptable under the circumstances” and “that they

chose this course in conscious disregard of an excessive risk to [the prisoner’s]

health”); see also Peralta v. Dillard, 744 F.3d 1076, 1086-88 (9th Cir. 2014) (en

banc) (official whose only role was reviewing internal appeal does not act with

deliberate indifference absent knowledge of a substantial risk of serious harm).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-16968
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Cyber Security Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Power Reactors (NUREG/CR-7141)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7141 (PDF - 1.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2014**Date Published:** November 2014

**Prepared by:** C. Chenoweth J. Green T. Shaw M. Shinn G. Simonds

MAR, Incorporated 1803 Research Boulevard Suite #204 Rockville, MD 20850-6106

Jonah Pezeshki, Security Specialist (Cyber)

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report, NUREG/CR-7141, "the U.S. NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Power Reactors" is a knowledge management product that provides an overview of, and historic perspective of the development of Regulatory Guide (RG) 5.71, "Cyber Security Programs for Nuclear Facilities." Further, this report provides a comparative analysis between the programmatic guidance contained within RG 5.71 and both the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Risk Management Framework found in NIST Special Publication 800-37, "Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems," Revision 1, and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards. This framework correlates the high baseline security controls published by NIST in Special Publication 800-53, "Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations," Revision 3, to those contained in Appendices B and C of RG 5.71 ("Technical Security Controls" and "Operational and Management Security Controls", respectively). This report is not regulatory guidance and does not supersede policy decisions made by the NRC on behalf of security programs defined in the NRC's regulations, or rules. Nor does this report impose any new requirements or interpretations of NRC regulations that could be used for complying with a license's approved cyber security plan, as defined in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 73.54, "Protection of Digital Computer and Communication Systems and Networks" (10 CFR 73.54).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# NRC To Meet With Public To Discuss Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel at San Onofre

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS), National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH or Institute)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting.
    Times and Dates:
8 a.m.-5 p.m., February 18, 2015 (Closed)
8 a.m.-5 p.m., February 19, 2015 (Closed)
8 a.m.-5 p.m., February 20, 2015 (Closed)
    Place: Embassy Suites, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, Virginia 
22314, Telephone: 703-684-5900, Fax: 703-684-0653.
    Purpose: The Safety and Occupational Health Study Section will 
review, discuss, and evaluate grant application(s) received in response 
to the Institute's standard grants review and funding cycles pertaining 
to research issues in occupational safety and health, and allied areas.
    It is the intent of NIOSH to support broad-based research endeavors 
in keeping with the Institute's program goals. This will lead to 
improved understanding and appreciation for the magnitude of the 
aggregate health burden associated with occupational injuries and 
illnesses, as well as to support more focused research projects, which 
will lead to improvements in the delivery of occupational safety and 
health services, and the prevention of work-related injury and illness. 
It is anticipated that research funded will promote these program 
goals.
    Matters for Discussion: The meeting will convene to address matters 
related to the conduct of Study Section business and for the study 
section to consider safety and occupational health-related grant 
applications.
    These portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, pursuant to Section 10(d) Public Law 92-463.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person For More Information: Price Connor, Ph.D., NIOSH 
Health Scientist, CDC, 2400 Executive Parkway, Mailstop E-20, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30345, Telephone: (404) 498-2511, Fax: (404) 498-2571.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-01379 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1812 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1812

    To provide that the Executive order entitled ``Promoting Energy 
  Independence and Economic Growth'' (March 28, 2017), shall have no 
 force or effect, to prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the 
                Executive order, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mr. Schneider (for himself, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Crist, Mr. 
Beyer, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Delaney, Mr. 
Garamendi, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Hanabusa, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Lee, 
 Mr. Lipinski, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. McNerney, Mrs. 
 Murphy of Florida, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Peters, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Polis, Mr. 
  Perlmutter, Mr. Quigley, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. 
Suozzi, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Clay, 
Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Price of North Carolina, 
Mr. Hastings, and Mr. Cartwright) introduced the following bill; which 
 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 
 to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, the Judiciary, 
 and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that the Executive order entitled ``Promoting Energy 
  Independence and Economic Growth'' (March 28, 2017), shall have no 
 force or effect, to prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce the 
                Executive order, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Leadership In 
Mitigating Administration Threats to the Earth Act'' or the ``CLIMATE 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER TO HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT.

    Beginning on March 28, 2017, the Executive order entitled 
``Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth'' (March 28, 2017), 
is null and void, shall have no force or effect, and may not be 
implemented, administered, or enforced.

SEC. 3. NO FUNDS AVAILABLE.

    No Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce 
(including through the issuance of any regulations) the Executive order 
entitled ``Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth'' (March 
28, 2017).

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on March 28, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                              OF GLOBIX CORPORATION

       This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended December
31, 2002 of Globix Corporation (the "Company").

       I, John D. McCarthy, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify that:

              (i)    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
                     Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                     Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d));
                     and

              (ii)   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2003.

                                                   /s/ John D. McCarthy
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       Name: John D. McCarthy
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |                                     |      |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------|
| DATE:                April                2, 2007 | By:                            | /s/  |
|                                              | Marius                  Silvasan         |
|                                              | Chief                  Executive Officer |

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   May 12, 2008 | /s/ Karl  Schneider                 |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                            | Karl Schneider                      |
|                            | Senior Vice  President, Finance and |
|                            | Chief Financial  Officer            |

 

----