alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4800 South 188th Street

SeaTac, WA 98188-8605 City Hall: 206.973.4800 Fax: 206.973.4809 TDD: 206.973.4808

Mayor Terry**Annipr~(1n** Deputy Mayor Gene Fisher
Coun2i1members Rick Forschler Tony Anderson Ralph Shape Pam Fernald Mia Gregerson

Interim City Manager Todd Cutts City Attorney Mary Mirante Bartolo City Clerk Kristina March 17,2010

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
Reference: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018
Dear Secretary LaHood:
On behalfofthe City ofSeaTac, I am writing to express our enthusiastic support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new, nonstop service between Seattle an<!T**<:l~!l_aneda** Internatiogal**Airpo~H** Seattle and Washington State has been an extremely important U.S. gateway for Japan with strong historical, cultural, and business ties. Itis also a hub ofthe entire Pacific Northwestregion, fueled by our hometown carriers Alaska and Horizon Air, which provide connections to 55 US cities for the proposed Tokyo-Haneda route. Delta's service from Seattle to Asia has long been successful and Seattle's enplanements show stronger growththan peer airports in recent years. Service between Seattle and Haneda is a natural addition for Delta's West Coast gateway. Washington State is already the most trade-dependent state in the country. Delta's new service to Hanedawill create direct and immediate economic benefits for ourregion. Delta currently employs over 1,400 in our state and we expect the numberto grow as they develop theirpresence in Seattle.
Ourregion's business travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtownHaneda airport, without having to transitto Los Angeles, San Francisco, or Vancouver, BC. The Departmenthas the opportunity to ensure**_._._._th~t** Seattle cOlltinues to grow as an important international gateway and should approve the frequencies proposed by Deltato serve Haneda.
We respectfully ask the Department ofTransportation for its consideration of DeltaAir Lines' request.

C: City Council TAA:lke The Hospitality City
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7220

MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE SHINAULT; JACK LEE; LIEUTENANT MCCLANAHAN; SERGEANT VANDYKE; SERGEANT HORTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FIELDS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

MCNERLIN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SANDSTROM; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

RIFE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LOONEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-504-7)

Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Eury v. Shinault, No. CA-99-

504-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      23.3




December
      31 2007




El
      Capitan Precious Metals Inc.


Suite
      276


1325
      Airmotive Way


Reno,
      NV
      89502




Gentlemen:




The
      undersigned hereby consents to the reference to the undersigned in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. for the year ended
      September 30, 2007 (the “Annual Report”), including without limitation
      references in Item 2, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission.




I
      also
      confirm that I have read each of the references to me in the Annual Report
      and
      concur with such statements. In giving this consent, the undersigned does not
      admit that he is within the category of persons whose consent is required by
      Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
      regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Sincerely,/s/
                Michael J. WendellMichael
                J. Wendell
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Antonio R. Alvarez, the Chief Executive Officer of Leadis Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this
15th day of March, 2006.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/s/    ANTONIO R.
ALVAREZAntonio R.
Alvarez
|Chief Executive Officer                    



This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Leadis Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 23.1
– consent of independent registered public accounting firm



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-146574) of Medicure Inc. of our report dated April 26, 2017, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Medicure Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year
ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|Winnipeg,
    Canada, |                                   
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------
|April 26, 2017        | Chartered Professional Accountants
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ COT'N WASH INC., BIG 3 PACKAGING LLC, Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

SUN PRODUCTS CORPORA TION, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2014

- 1805

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12

- cv

- 00651

- SLR, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

______________________
JU DGMENT

______________________
S TEVEN M OLO , MoloLamken LLP, New York, NY, a rgued for plaintiffs

- appellants. Also represented by B ENOIT Q UARMBY ; E RIC R ICHARD N ITZ , R OBERT K ELSEY K RY , Washington, DC.

E RROL T AYLOR , Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by F REDRICK Z ULLOW , A NNA B ROOK

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , M OORE , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 4, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
No. 90-6308.

#### Gray *v.*Board of County Commissioners for the County of El Paso, Colorado, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# TRAC-M/F77, Version 5.5 Developmental Assessment Manual (NUREG/CR-6730)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6730            - Volume 1 - Assessments              - Cover – Page 4.7-40 (PDF 9.93 MB)
            - Page 4.8-1 – Page 5.4-30 (PDF 10.53 MB) 
          - Volume 2 - Appendices              - Cover – Page 4.7-40 (PDF 12.57 MB)
            - Appendix L – Appendix S-48 (PDF 9.77 MB)
            - Appendix T – End (PDF 8.36 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2001**Date Published:** July 2001

**Prepared by:** B.E. Boyack, J.F. Lime, D.A. Pimentel, J.W. Spore, J.L. Steiner

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545

F. Odar, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code K6892

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Los Alamos National Laboratory has developed the Transient Reactor Analysis Code (TRAC) to provide advanced, best-estimate simulations of real and postulated transients in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and for many related thermal-hydraulic facilities. The modernized TRACM/F77, Version 5.5, is the latest release version. The previous release code, TRAC-PF1/MOD2, Version 5.4, was modified by removing nonstandard FORTRAN constructs to produce a standard FORTRAN 77 (F77) code. In the process, a more uniform programming style was established. TRAC-M/F77 (1) is more portable and maintainable than Version 5.4; (2) retains TRAC's essential features, a one- and/or threedimensional, two-fluid treatment for the thermal hydraulics; (3) has other necessary modeling capabilities to model a reactor system; and (4) has a newly enhanced reflood model.

This Developmental Assessment Manual describes the TRAC-M/F77, Version 5.5, assessment calculations that were compared with analytical calculations and experimental data. The manual is issued in two volumes. Volume I contains the assessment sections, and Volume II contains the appendices. The appendices to the manual include the input listings of the assessment problems, and code-data comparision of assessments exercised with different reflood, grid spacer, and noding modeling options. The comparisons were performed to determine the accuracy and applicability of TRAC-M/F77. Based on these assessments against analytical solutions, separate-effects tests, and integral tests, we believe that TRAC-M/F77 is a viable calculational tool for analyzing PWRs during a loss-of-coolant accident and operational transients. In addition, the developmental assessment calculations demonstrate that TRACM/F77 is applicable to a wide range of test facilities and is accurate in terms of predicting major trends.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2015260EN.01003001.xml

| 7.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 260/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 260/30

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1793

of 6 October 2015

amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/389/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/389/CFSP (1).

1

| (2) | On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/485/CFSP (2) amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP and extending the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) until 12 December 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/485/CFSP (2) amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP and extending the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) until 12 December 2016.

2

| (3) | Decision 2012/389/CFSP should be amended to extend the period covered by the financial reference amount until 15 December 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2012/389/CFSP should be amended to extend the period covered by the financial reference amount until 15 December 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 13(1) and (2) of Decision 2012/389/CFSP are replaced as follows:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR from 16 July 2012 to 15 November 2013 shall be EUR 22 880 000.

The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 November 2013 to 15 October 2014 shall be EUR 11 950 000.

The financial reference amount to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP NESTOR for the period from 16 October 2014 to 15 December 2015 shall be EUR 17 900 000.

2.   All expenditure shall be managed in accordance with the rules and procedures applicable to the general budget of the Union. Participation of natural and legal persons in the award of procurement contracts by EUCAP NESTOR shall be open without limitations. Moreover, no rule of origin for the goods purchased by EUCAP NESTOR shall apply.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 6 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

P. GRAMEGNA

---

(1)  Council Decision 2012/389/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 40).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2014/485/CFSP of 22 July 2014 amending Decision 2012/389/CFSP on the European Union Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP NESTOR) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 39).

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Todd M. Hornbeck, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Todd M. Hornbeck                           
|                     |  |  |  | Todd M. Hornbeck                               
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000905 07-NOV-2014 09:46 AM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Baltimore Tunnel Fire Scenario (NUREG/CR-6886)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00696-CR

John Robert Welch, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 58681, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 8, 2007

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Dennis
Harkins, President and Chief Financial Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the ”Company”),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of the Company
for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (“the Company Form 10- K”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the Company Form 10- K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Dennis Harkins
            
            March
      31, 2009Dennis
      Harkins – President and Chief Financial Officer
            
            Date
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: May 2, 2005
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                   |                                 |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                              |                              |                            |
| DATE:                November 14, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Robert                Krebs |
|                                   | Robert                Krebs            |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

June 6, 2008

The Board of
Directors

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

No. 1, R
& D Road 1

Hsinchu Science Park

Hsinchu City, 30076

Republic of China

Attention: Mr. S.J. Cheng

Dear Sirs,

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130230 on Form F-3 and Registration
Statements Nos. 333-137838, 333-116670 and 333-85290 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 18, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual
Report). We also consent to the inclusion of our report in the Annual Report.

Yours faithfully,



/s/ Moore Stephens

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7**  **3 3**  **2**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. FERNANDO ROCHO FUENTES, a/k/a Fernando Ortega Fuentes, a/k/a Fernando Fuentes Ortega , Defen d a nt

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 5 :0 7

- c r - 0 0012

- sgw - mfu

- 2 )

Submitted : August 31, 2010 Decided: September 1 3 , 2010

Before GREGORY and AGEE, C i rcuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Fernando Rocho Fuentes , Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fernando Rocho Fuentes seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 225 5 ( West Supp. 20 1 0) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . When the district court den i e s relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong
. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); s ee Mille r - El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds , the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denia l of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85
. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Fuentes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D