alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2003, and for the period then ended.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Glade M. Knight                              
|Glade M. Knight                                  
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



March
22, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2015

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Morse, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*May 7*—

September *13, 1927.*

*Appeal and error: Affirmance by divided court.*

Where the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved in an appeal, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Error to review a judgment of the circuit court for Grant county: S. E. Smarley, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Criminal prosecution against *J. W. Morse,*who was adjudged guilty of intoxication in a public place.

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by *Walker & Christenson*of Lancaster, and oral argument by *O. F. Christenson.*

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, J. E. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, and *R. M. Orchard,*district attorney of Grant county, and oral argument by *Mr. Orchard*and *Mr. Messerschmidt.*

Stevens, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje did not participate in the consideration and decision of the case in this court. The members of the court participating are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved upon this appeal. Mr. Justice Eschweiler, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and Mr. Justice Crownhart are of the opinion that the judgment *496appealed from should be reversed. Mr. Justice Rosen-berry, Mr. Justice Owen, and the writer are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Under the established rule it follows that the judgment appealed from is affirmed. *Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm.*189 Wis. 626, 628, 208 N. W. 266.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





In connection with the report on Form
10-K of Janel World Trade, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers of the registrant certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the registrant.





Dated:
      July 23, 2009
              
              /s/ James N. JannelloJames
      N. Jannello, Executive
                Vice
      President and Chief
                Executive
      OfficerDated:
      July 23, 2009
              
              /s/Linda BielerController
      and Chief
                Financial
      and Accounting
                Officer
No. 82-5998.

#### Paul *v.*Maggio, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.2
                                 ------------



                                       13
<PAGE>


               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S
               -------------------------------------------------
           ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS
           --------------------------------------------------------
            SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
            -------------------------------------------------------
                               MORTGAGE BANKERS
                               ----------------



Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion about Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL) ("the Company") compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of
and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying
management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc., and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CHL) complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the ten months ended December 31, 2001 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 7, 2002


                                       14
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Pharmaceutical Product Development Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement
of Operations included within this Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         38,168
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                   960
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,374
<PP&E>                                         95,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                 49,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          81,078
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,453
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,495
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               69,610
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (125)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.25
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Cato, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 548]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), rendered October 15, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application to review the personnel files of a police officer witness since he failed to present “some factual predicate” supporting such disclosure *(People v Gissendanner,*48 NY2d 543, 550 [1979]; *see People v Andino,*291 AD2d 242 [2002]; *People v Davis,*203 AD2d 300 [1994]; *People v Valentine,*160 AD2d 325 [1990]; Civil Rights Law § 50-a). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly curtailed the defendant’s cross-examination of that witness regarding his motive to falsify. The Supreme Court has broad discretion to limit cross-examination when questions are repetitive, irrelevant or only marginally relevant, concern collateral issues, or threaten to mislead the jury *(see Delaware v Van Arsdall,*475 US 673, 679 [1986]; *People v Sul,*234 AD2d 563 [1996]; *People v Turner,*243 AD2d 742 [1997]; *People v De Jesus,*189 AD2d 774 [1993]).

Further, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in considering the defendant’s presentence investigation report wherein the defendant denied possessing drugs as a factor in imposing a higher sentence. It is evident from the record that the Supreme Court considered the statement indicative of the defendant’s lack of remorse and unwillingness to accept responsibility for his crime *(see People v Burk,*220 AD2d 891 [1995]; *People v Barnes,*219 AD2d 527, 528 [1995]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit *(see*
      *395
      *People v Ali,*301 AD2d 609 [2003]; *People v Mojica,*239 AD2d 609 [1997]; *People v Marchese,*224 AD2d 341 [1996]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Tan Ho Chen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company), and Joseph C. P. Shieh, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: April 23, 2007



By:

/s/    TAN HO
CHENName:

Tan Ho ChenTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/    JOSEPH C.P. SHIEHName:

Joseph C.P. ShiehTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
No. 86-6011.

No. 86-6111.

No. 86-6123.

#### In re Grisso; In re Seitu; and In re Johl.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kingdom Ventures Inc a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ending July
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Gene Jackson, President & CEO, of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my
knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                 /s/ Gene Jackson
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Gene Jackson
                                                President & CEO


August 03, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of TX Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jose Fuentes,
Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my
knowledge:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Jose Fuentes


Jose
Fuentes


Chief
Financial Officer


: January
8, 2010





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TX Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by TX Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         5373293
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        13144043
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   60240598
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        24219434
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          24479426
<LOANS>                                      416177549
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3586150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               531027968
<DEPOSITS>                                   437965580
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           10018454
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7682791
<OTHER-SE>                                    75362143
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               531027968
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               16959927
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3077874
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              20037801
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            10985459
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            10985459
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          9052342
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   180000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              305161
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 698652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6108215
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6108215
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4039119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.00
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3406150
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3586150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            839750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2746400
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation 
Research Committee.
    Date: February 26-27, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton--Silver Spring, Cypress Ballroom, 8777 Georgia 
Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: James T. Snyder, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities/NIAID, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892-7616, 240-669-6050, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a707b777f69346974637e7f685a747372347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="345e555951471a475a4d505146745a5d5c1a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 26, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01717 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsCable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIFIRE) (NUREG/CR-7

# Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIFIRE), Phase 2: Vertical Shafts and Corridors (NUREG/CR-7010, Volume 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7010, Volume 2 (PDF - 21.36 MB)

For information about how the NRC handles your comments, see our Privacy Policy.

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2013**Date Published:** December 2013

**Prepared by:** Kevin McGrattan Scott Bareham

National Institute of Standards and Technology Building and Fire Research Laboratory Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8663

David Stroup, NRC Project Manager

 NRC Job Code N6983

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the second phase of a multi-year program called CHRISTIFIRE (Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations during Fire). The overall goal of the program is to quantify the burning characteristics of grouped electrical cables. This second phase of the program involved bench-scale and large-scale experiments. Bench-scale experiments were performed using a cone calorimeter in which 10 cm (4 in) by 10 cm (4 in) cable segments were exposed to a relatively high heat flux to determine their burning rate, heat of combustion, and other properties. The large scale experiments consisted of loaded cable trays situated in vertical and horizontal configurations. For the vertical experiments, two cable trays were positioned either in the open air, or in a vertical shaft that was open at the top and bottom. For the horizontal experiments, from one to four loaded cable trays were positioned horizontally with a 30 cm (1 ft) separation from the ceiling and tray to tray. The purpose of both sets of fullscale experiments was to determine the heat release and spread rates of burning cables in a variety of realistic configurations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04920

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04920\04920_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04920\04920_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04920\04920_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04920\04920_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04920\Certification Statement Plant ID 04920.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04920\04920_Calc Sheet_incomplete.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 04920\04920_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04920\04920_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.