alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0604 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-110-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CLEMENTE-ALONSO and

CECILIA SAGUILLAN-MARROQUIN,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71079

Agency Nos. A095-198-840

A095-198-841

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Juan Clemente-Alonso and Cecilia Saguillan-Marroquin, husband and wife

and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.

FILED

JUL 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71079

We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s denial of petitioners’ motion to

reopen based on further evidence of hardship. See Fernandez v. Gonzales,

439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars

jurisdiction when question presented in motion to reopen is essentially the same

hardship ground originally decided); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (explaining that

motion to reopen shall not be granted unless evidence is material and was not

available or discoverable at the hearing).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
No. 75-1743.

#### Doyle et al. *v.*Sheehan.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:General Electric Company exemption.  Docket ID FAA-2009-0772.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2530

_____________________________

LITECRETE, INC./SUMMIT 

CONSULTING, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

EDGAR ZAMBRANO,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Margret G. Kerr, Judge.

Date of Accident: April 19, 2014.

March 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

H. George Kagan of H. George Kagan, P.A., Gulf Stream, for 

Appellants.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for 

Appellee.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Bill I. Pennington, certify that:1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Teton Energy Corporation; 2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date:March 19, 2007           /s/ Bill I. Pennington     Bill I. Pennington    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5105-5106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13994-002]


Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County; Notice of 
Technical Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: Hancock Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 
13994.
    b. Date and Time of Meeting: February 5, 2015; 3:30 p.m. Eastern 
Time (12:30 p.m. Pacific Time).
    c. Place: Telephone conference with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service (FWS) and the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County 
(Snohomish PUD).
    d. FERC Contact: Kelly Wolcott, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7dcd2dbdbce99c0d8dbd4d8c3c3f7d1d2c5d499d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="28434d444451065f47444b475c5c684e4d5a4b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 
502-6480.
    e. Purpose of Meeting: To discuss the endangered species 
consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act relative to 
the northern spotted owl; specifically, whether Snohomish PUD's 
comments on the environmental assessment and the Commission's 
recommendation for blasting restrictions to protect the northern 
spotted owl require additional consultation with FWS. Discussion 
pertaining to this topic will be limited to Commission staff, Snohomish 
PUD, and FWS. Other participants may listen in and provide any germane 
information related to this topic.
    f. A summary of the meeting will be prepared and placed in the 
project's record.
    g. All local, State, and Federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact 
Kelly Wolcott at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79121c151500570e16151a160d0d391f1c0b1a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9698919184d38a92919e928989bd9b988f9ed39a928b">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 502-6480 by close of 
business Tuesday, February 2, 2015, to RSVP and to receive specific 
instructions on how to participate.


[[Page 5106]]


    Dated: January 22, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01729 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30582 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-289-1-A

- - - - - - - - - - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charles Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson was advised of the motion and served with a copy of counsel’s brief, but has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 03-30582 -2- responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Development of Quantitative Software Reliability Models for Digital Protection Systems of Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-7044)

This NUREG publication has been issued for public comment. The comment period is now closed.

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7044 (PDF - 8.79 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2011**Date Published:** July 2011

**Prepared by:** Tsong-Lun Chu Meng Yue Gerardo Martinez-Guridi John Lehner

Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973

Alan Kuritzky, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code N6919

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently performing research on the development of probabilistic models for digital instrumentation and control systems for inclusion in nuclear power plant (NPP) probabilistic risk assessments. As part of this research, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) is exploring the inclusion of software failures into digital system reliability models. A previous BNL technical report, entitled "Review of Quantitative Software Reliability Methods," BNL-94047-2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102240566), documented a review of currently available quantitative software reliability methods (QSRMs) that can be used to quantify software failure rates and probabilities of digital systems at NPPs and identified a set of desirable characteristics for QSRMs. In the current report, two candidate QSRMs are selected based on a structured comparison of the previously-identified QSRMs against the set of desirable characteristics. Each selected method is further developed in preparation to be applied in a case study. This report also identifies an example digital protection system for use in the case studies. The actual case studies will be documented in separate reports. Completion of the case studies is expected to provide a much better understanding of the existing capabilities and limitations in treating software failure in digital system reliability models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management

# WASH-1400 – The Reactor Safety Study – The Introduction of Risk Assessment to the Regulation of Nuclear Reactors (NUREG/KM-0010)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Preface

Download complete document
        - NUREG/KM-0010 (PDF - 2.84 MB)
        - NUREG/KM-0010, Errata (PDF - 121 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2016**Date Published:**August 2016

**Prepared by:** Reynold Bartel

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Preface

This NUREG incorporates information from the November 9, 2015, presentation titled "WASH-1400 and the Origins of Probabilistic Risk Assessment in the Nuclear Industry," by Drs. Thomas Wellock and Robert Budnitz, at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Headquarters in Rockville, MD. Felix Gonzalez and Dr. Nathan Siu from the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and Christine Steger, a member of the knowledge management staff in the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, who had the vision to produce this program in support of the NRC's Knowledge Management Program. A video of the lecture is available (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15348A211). The intended audience for this NUREG is anyone who has an interest in either the technical topic or the history of the use of risk analysis tools at the NRC. The lecture on November 9 featured both historical knowledge from Dr. Wellock and primary source information from Dr. Budnitz, who participated in the review of WASH-1400 in the mid 1970s. For completeness, the preparer expanded on the material presented on November 9 to ensure sufficient context for readers who may not be familiar with the topic.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
First 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2014

No. 04-13-00531-CV

Roger L. LOTT,

Appellant

v.

FIRST BANK,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 372518

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant Roger L. Lott’s brief was originally due October 18, 2013. After multiple 

extensions of time, Lott filed a pro se brief on January 8, 2014. The court concluded the brief 

flagrantly violated Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and on January 13, 

2014, we ordered the brief redrawn so as to correct the specified deficiencies. We ordered the 

redrawn brief filed by January 28, 2014, and notified appellant that his failure to comply with the 

order could result in the appeal being dismissed. 

Lott has not filed a redrawn brief. Instead, on January 28, attorney Michael R. Beliveau 

entered an appearance as counsel for Lott and moved for a fourteen day extension of time to file 

the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant’s redrawn brief filed by February 11, 2014.

The court will not entertain any further motions for extensions of time. If an appellant’s 

brief complying with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and correcting the deficiencies 

identified in our January 13, 2014 order is not filed by the date ordered, we will dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); see id. R. 38.9(a).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Stanley A. Smyczynski, Appellant, v Genesis Marketing Group of America, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d *8391014]

Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Doyle, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Seawright Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Joel Sens


Joel Sens,


Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer, and principal financial and accounting officer)





Date:  June 15, 2011
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of the Turbine Trip Transient in Santa María de Garoña Nuclear Power Plant with TRACE version 4.16 (NUREG/IA-0226)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0226 (PDF - 1.73 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 2008**Date Published:**April 2010

**Prepared by:** P. Corcuera, E. Rodriguez, and G. Villescas

University of Cantabria ETSIIT Av. De los Castros s/n 39005 Santander, SPAIN

Antony Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the results of the assessment of the TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) code, version 4.16, using the model of the Santa María de Garoña Nuclear Power Plant to simulate the transient that occurred on June 23, 1992, when a false high-level signal in the moisture separator caused an automatic trip of the main turbine.

The steady state was adjusted by connecting submodels of portions of the system previously tuned to the desired conditions.

The results show a good agreement with data for all the compared variables. The results of the calculations were in reasonable agreement with plant measurements. The simulations were run on a Pentium IV 3.4 megahertz under Windows XP with 32 bits executable.

This report was prepared by the Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Group belonging to the Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Department of the University of Cantabria, which collaborates in the area of simulation with the company Nuclenor S.A., owner of the nuclear power station Santa María de Garoña. The Asociación Espanola de la Industria Eléctrica (Electric Industry Association of Spain) and Nuclenor S.A. sponsored this work.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 91-6298.

#### Hall *v.*Jabe, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Meath, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1014]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (Penal Law § 195.05). Defendant’s "acts constituted a knowing, physical interference with and disruption of the official function * * * being performed by [the officer]” *(People v Tarver,*188 AD2d 938, *lv denied*81 NY2d 893; *see, People v Case,*42 NY2d 98, 102; *People v Ravizee,*146 Misc 2d 679, 682-683).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Sirkin, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Reevaluation of Station Blackout Risk at Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6890)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6890            - Vol. 1, Analysis of Loss of Offsite Power Events: 1986-2004 (PDF - 10.97 MB)
          - Vol. 2, Analysis of Station Blackout Risk (PDF - 5.93 MB)
          - Vol. 3, Resolution of Comments (PDF - 3.87 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2005**Published:** December 2005

**Prepared by:** S.A. Eide, C.D. Gentillon, T.E. Wierman, INL D.M. Rasmuson, NRC

Idaho National Laboratory Risk, Reliability, and NRC Programs Department Idaho Falls, ID 83415

Anne-Marie Grady, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

 NRC Job Code Y6546

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report is an update of previous reports analyzing loss of offsite power (LOOP) events and the associated station blackout (SBO) core damage risk at U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. LOOP data for 1986–2004 were collected and analyzed. Frequency and duration estimates for critical and shutdown operations were generated for four categories of LOOPs: plant centered, switchyard centered, grid related, and weather related. Overall, LOOP frequencies during critical operation have decreased significantly in recent years, while LOOP durations have increased. Various additional topics of interest are also addressed, including comparisons with results from other studies, seasonal impacts on LOOP frequencies, and consequential LOOPs. Finally, additional engineering analyses of the LOOP data were performed. To obtain SBO results, updated LOOP frequencies and offsite power nonrecovery curves were input into standardized plant analysis risk (SPAR) models covering the 103 operating commercial nuclear power plants. Core damage frequency results indicating contributions from SBO and other LOOP-initiated scenarios are presented for each of the 103 plants, along with plant class and industry averages. In addition, a comprehensive review of emergency diesel generator performance was performed to obtain current estimates for the SPAR models. Overall, SPAR results indicate that core damage frequencies for LOOP and SBO are lower than previous estimates. Improvements in emergency diesel generator performance contribute to this risk reduction.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021