alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
     I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd (the“Registrant”), certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accenture Ltd (this“Annual Report”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this AnnualReport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and
          c) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.              /s/ William D. Green   Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd   (principal executive officer)   
Dated: November 4, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1

Financial Statement Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

I, David M. McCarthy, Chief Executive Officer of Zanett, Inc., hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-KSB of  Zanett, Inc., for
the annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Zanett, Inc. Form 10-KSB"),
which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)) and information contained in the Zanett, Inc. Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Zanett, Inc.



/s/ David M. McCarthy                                   April 15, 2003
-------------------------------------------              --------------
David M. McCarthy - Chief Executive Officer             Date
























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Zanett, Inc. and will be retained by Zanett, Inc. and furnished
to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1806 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1806

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the expensing of 
                              race horses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mr. Barr introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the expensing of 
                              race horses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTION TO EXPENSE RACE HORSES.

    (a) In General.--Part VI of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after section 
179E the following new section:

``SEC. 179F. ELECTION TO EXPENSE RACE HORSES.

    ``A taxpayer may elect to treat the cost of any race horse as an 
expense which is not chargeable to capital account. Any cost so treated 
shall be allowed as a deduction for the taxable year in which the race 
horse is placed in service.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part VI of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 179E the 
following new item:

``Sec. 179F. Election to expense race horses.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Latest NRC Assessment Rates Dresden "Acceptable" in Engineering and "Good" inOperations, Maintenance, and Plant Support

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-02 

January 6, 1998

**LATEST NRC ASSESSMENT RATES DRESDEN "ACCEPTABLE" IN ENGINEERINGAND "GOOD" IN OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND PLANT SUPPORT**

 In its latest assessment of plant performance, the NRC staff noted improved performance at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station with an improved rating of "good" in maintenance, continued "good" ratings in operations and plant support, and a continued "acceptable" rating in engineering.

The NRC staff will discuss the review, called the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP), in a meeting at 1 p.m., January 16, in the Training Building at the Dresden plant. The plant is located north of Lorenzo Road in Grundy County, Illinois. The meeting will be open to public observation.

NRC SALP reports evaluate utilities in four functional areas -- plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support -- and assign ratings of Category 1,2, or 3 depending on whether their performance in those areas is superior, good or acceptable. The report on Dresden gives the plant a "Category 2" rating -- indicating good performance -- in operations, maintenance, and plant support and a "Category 3" rating -- indicating acceptable performance -- in engineering.

The report covers the period December 29, 1996, through November 22 of last year.

In notifying the utility of the SALP findings, Regional Administrator A. Bill Beach stated, "Good performance in the conduct of plant operations and strong management support of a conservative operating philosophy were evident throughout this operating period."

"We noted that substantial improvement was made in the material condition of the plant," he continued. "This was significant because during past rating periods operators were frequently challenged by equipment problems that unexpectedly affected plant performance."

Beach added, "Although performance in the area of engineering continued to improve, sustained improvement remains to be demonstrated." The utility was directed to provide the NRC with its plans to improve performance in the engineering area.

SALP Report Results:

Note: SALP reports are available for review on the NRC's internet web site at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Soft Controls: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance (NUREG/CR-6635)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6635 (PDF - 7.23 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2000**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** W. F. Stubler, J. M. O'Hara/BNL J. Kramer/NRC

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

J. Kramer, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J6012

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In conventional control rooms, the predominant means for providing control input is via hard-wired, spatially dedicated control devices that have fixed functions. However, in human-system interfaces featuring computerbased technologies, the operator may interact via "soft" controls – devices having connections with control and display systems that are mediated by software rather than direct physical connections. Soft controls can have functions that are variable and context dependent rather than statically defined. For example, a particular action may produce different results based on the currently active mode of the control device. Also, device locations may be virtual rather than spatially dedicated. That is, personnel may be able to access a particular soft control from multiple locations within a display system. These characteristics provide new opportunities for operator errors and may affect operator response during time-critical tasks. The objective of this study was to develop human factors review guidance for soft control systems. A methodology for developing technically valid guidance was used. To support this objective, we developed a characterization framework for describing key design characteristics of soft control systems including: display devices, input devices, and methods of interaction. Then, we examined research in the following, areas (1) human error in soft control use, (2) general design approaches for error tolerance, and (3) human performance considerations associated with specific control actions. This research provided the technical basis upon which design review guidelines were developed for the following: display devices, input devices, information displays, and interaction methods. There were aspects of soft controls for which the technical basis was insufficient to support development of the guidance. These were identified as issues to be addressed in future research.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 10.8
                                                                    ------------


                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                                       TO
                      MR3 TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION AGREEMENT


         The Technology Acquisition Agreement ("Agreement") executed the 10th
day of April, 2002 ("Effective Date"), by and between Linsa Associates, Ltd.,
and MR3 Systems, Inc., is hereby amended, retroactive to this Effective Date, to
include the country of Canada on the attached Exhibit B list as a Restricted
Area.


         WHEREAS, the parties have executed this Amendment Number One in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, as of October 28, 2002.


LINSA ASSOCIATES, LTD.                     MR3 SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ ROBIN BOLLI
    ---------------------------------

By: /s/ FRANCESCO CASTELLAZZI              By: /s/ RANDALL S. REIS
    ---------------------------------          ---------------------------------
                                               Randall S. Reis, Chairman and CEO
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT B


Restricted Areas is defined as the following countries:

         Canada
         Taiwan
         China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Mongolia)
         Korea (except any transaction with Korea Zinc Co., Ltd.)
         Japan
         Australia
         Bahrain
         Brunei
         Cambodia
         Egypt
         Federated States of Micronesia
         Iran
         Iraq
         Jordan
         Kuwait
         Lebanon
         India
         Indonesia
         Israel
         Laos
         Malaysia
         Maldives
         Myanmar
         Nepal
         New Zealand
         North Korea
         Oman
         Pakistan
         Saudi Arabia
         Singapore
         Sri Lanka
         Syria
         Thailand
         The Philippines
         United Arab Emirates
         Vietnam
         Yemen

                                                                               2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

          - [NPS-SER-CONG-17094; PPSECONGS0/PPMPSPD1Z.YM00000]

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Congaree National Park in South Carolina plans to collect expanded amenity recreation fees at the Longleaf Campground and Bluff Campground beginning in early 2015. Revenue will be used to cover the cost of collections at the campground and for deferred maintenance in the park.

# DATES:

We will begin collecting fees on July 28, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lauren Gurniewicz, Chief of Interpretation, Congaree National Park, 100 National Park Road, Hopkins, SC 29061; telephone (803) 647-3969; or by email at                         *lauren_gurniewicz@nps.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is to comply with Section 804 of the Federal Lands Recration Enhancement Act of 2004 (Pub.L. 108-447). The act requires agencies to give the public 6 months advance notice of the establishment of a new recreation fee area.

Rates at Longleaf Campground will be $10 per night for an individual tent only site with no hook-ups; $20 per night for a group tent only site with no hook-ups. Rates at Bluff Campground will be $5 per night for an individual tent only site with no hook-ups. These fees were determined through a comparability study of similar sites in the area at Federal, state, and private recreation areas and will only be charged at the Longleaf and Bluff campgrounds. In accordance with NPS public involvement guidelines, the park engaged numerous individuals, organizations, and local, state, and Federal government representatives while planning for the implementation of this fee.

Dated: November 21, 2014.

Lena McDowall,

Associate Director, Business Services.

[FR Doc. 2015-01678 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JD-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Legend International Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the
undersigned, Peter James Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  March
25, 2009





graphicPeter
      James LeeSecretary
      andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)




70
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
NCO Portfolio Management, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying
the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To the best of his knowledge, the
undersigned, in his capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


         /s/ MICHAEL J. BARRIST
         ---------------------------
         Chief Executive Officer
         Date: March 13, 2003
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Excelligence Learning Corporation: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-107917, 333-75602, 333-64762, 333-64764 and 333-64766) on Form S-8 of Excelligence Learning Corporation (formerly LearningStar Corp.) of our report dated February 13, 2004, relatingto the consolidated balance sheets of Excelligence Learning Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Excelligence Learning Corporation. 

 

Our report refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill andOther Intangible Assets.” 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

San Francisco, CA 

March 4, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Probabilistic Liquefaction Analysis (NUREG/CR-6622)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6622 (PDF - 2.89 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 1999**Date Published:** November 1999

**Prepared by:** M. E. Hynes

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199

E. G. Zurflueh, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6246

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document provides a technical basis for formulating probabilistic approaches to liquefaction evaluation. The three basic elements of probabilistic liquefaction analysis are described: (1) uncertainty in the earthquake load, (2) uncertainty in the available resistance, and (3) uncertainty in the method of analysis. The probabilistic approach is built from the steps in a deterministic liquefaction analysis; however, the input parameters, such as penetration resistance, site stratigraphy, acceleration, and magnitude, are treated as random variables and the accuracy of the method of analysis is factored in as part of a capacity-demand model. Uncertainty in the earthquake load is generally treated with a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis which introduces time as a parameter. The site stratigraphy and engineering properties are generally treated as one-, two-, or three-dimensional random fields. Uncertainty in the method of analysis is generally estimated with logit regression analysis of the field performance data base. It is assumed that the reader has a working knowledge of probability theory, stochastic processes, liquefaction evaluation, and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis calculations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
---

Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 16, 2012

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, William J. Pennstrom, Jr., M.A., do hereby
consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report
entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the Livengood Project, Tolovana
District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form of International Tower Hill
Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated March 16, 2012.

I also consent to the use of my name in the
Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and Annual
Information Form dated March 16, 2012, and to the incorporation by reference of
this Annual Report on Form 40-F in the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement
(SEC File No. 333-158533).

| | By: | /s/ William Pennstrom Jr.
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     | William J. Pennstrom, Jr.
| |     | QPMMSA, SME              
| |     | Pennstrom Consulting Inc.

---