alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1805 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1805

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the holding period 
 used to determine whether horses are section 1231 assets to 12 months.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mr. Barr introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the holding period 
 used to determine whether horses are section 1231 assets to 12 months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equine Tax Parity Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF HOLDING PERIOD TO 12 MONTHS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING WHETHER HORSES ARE SECTION 1231 ASSETS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1231(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``and horses''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffPerformance and Accountability Report (NUREG-1542)

# Performance and Accountability Report — Fiscal Year 2004 (NUREG-1542, Volume 10)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1542, Volume 10 (PDF- 9.48 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: November 2004

Resource Management and Support Staff Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Performance and Accountability Report provides performance results and audited financial statements that enable Congress, the President, and the public to assess the performance of the agency in achieving its mission and stewardship of its resources. The report contains a concise overview, management's discussion and analysis, as well as performance and financial sections. Additional details of performance results and program evaluations can be found in the appendices.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Relating to the License Renewal of James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG-1905)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1905 (PDF - 47.33 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: ** April 2008**Date Published: ** April 2008

 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of License Renewal  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP) license renewal application (LRA) by the United States (US) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (the staff). By letter dated July 31, 2006, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO or the applicant) submitted the LRA in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants," of the Code of Federal Regulations. ENO requests renewal of the JAFNPP operating license (Facility Operating License Number DPR-59) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration at midnight October 17, 2014.

JAFNPP is located approximately 7 miles northeast of Oswego, New York. The NRC issued the JAFNPP construction permit on May 20, 1970, and operating license on October 17, 1974. JAFNPP is of a Mark 1, General Electric (GE) 4, boiling water reactor design. GE supplied the nuclear steam supply system and Stone and Webster originally designed and constructed the balance of the plant. The JAFNPP licensed power output is 2536 megawatt thermal with a gross electrical output of approximately 881 megawatt electric.

This SER presents the status of the staff's review of information submitted through November 05, 2007, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER. On July 31, 2007, the staff issued a draft SER which identified two open items that had to be resolved before the staff makes a final determination on the application. The two open items have now been resolved and SER Section 1.5 summarizes these items and its resolutions. SER Section 6 provides the staffs final conclusion on the review of the July 31, 2006, JAFNPP LRA, and all its subsequent amendment letters as listed in SER Appendix B.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Comprehensive Diversity Management Plan (NUREG/BR-0316, Rev. 5)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0316, Rev. 5 (PDF - 113 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**October 2010

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

It is the policy of the NRC to foster equal opportunity for all employees and to promote principles of diversity management that will enhance the level of effectiveness and efficiency of its programs. The concept of diversity management is a strategic business objective that seeks to increase organizational capacity in a workplace where the contributions of all employees are recognized and valued. NRC's goal is to build a high-performing, diverse workforce based on mutual acceptance and trust. It is also NRC's policy to select the best-qualified applicant for the job, regardless of race, national origin, gender, age, color, disability, religion, sexual orientation, or any other non-merit factor.

The Commission and senior management continue to support the Comprehensive Development Management Plan to guide individual behaviors, decisions, and diversity management initiatives that gauge how well the agency is achieving its diversity management objective. The Comprehensive Diversity Management Plan represents a structured approach to ensure continued progress in reaching its diversity management goals, promoting a discrimination-free work environment, and providing opportunities for all employees to use their diverse talents to support the agency's mission.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation (Committee), previously scheduled to be held at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 720, Washington, DC, on January 26-28, 2015                     *has been cancelled.*

                    For more information, please contact Ms. Nancy Copeland, Designated Federal Officer at (202) 461-9684 or via email at                     *Nancy.Copeland@va.gov.*

Dated: January 26, 2015.

Rebecca Schiller,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01694 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### In the Matter of Tanya P., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Barbara F., Appellant; Chautauqua County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 950]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that, despite diligent efforts by petitioner to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship, respondent failed to plan for the future of her child for a period of more than one year following the child’s placement with petitioner although physically and financially able to do so *(see,*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *Matter of Gregory B.,*74 NY2d 77, 86-87; *Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 142-143; *Matter of Raymond B.,*219 AD2d 800 [decided herewith]; *Matter of Matthew Thomas H.,*216 AD2d 882). Petitioner engaged in meaningful efforts to assist respondent in planning for the return of the child by making arrangements for weekly visitation and counseling and mental health evaluations for respondent and the child, and by meeting monthly with respondent to assess her progress in meeting goals that were set to permit the return of the child. Petitioner identified the problems facing respondent and made "affirmative, repeated, and meaningful efforts” to assist respondent in overcoming them *(Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 385; *see, Matter of Shannon U.,*210 AD2d 752, 754, *lv denied*85 NY2d 807). Although respondent maintained regular contact with *850the child and generally cooperated with petitioner’s caseworkers, there is clear and convincing evidence in the record that the progress of respondent was minimal and superficial and that she failed to avail herself of the continuing opportunities to allow her to reunite with the child. The fact that respondent suffers from some emotional impairment does not preclude a finding of permanent neglect *(see, Matter of Dixie Lu EE.,*142 AD2d 747, 749). Respondent’s mental or emotional disability is not the equivalent of physical inability for purposes of Social Services Law § 384-b (7) *(see, Matter of Candie Lee W.,*91 AD2d 1106, 1107). The record establishes that respondent has failed to take the " 'steps [necessary] to correct the conditions that led to the removal of the child from the * * * home’ ” *(Matter of Nathaniel T.,*67 NY2d 838, 840).

Lastly, the record supports the court’s determination that termination of respondent’s parental rights is in the child’s best interests *(see, Matter of Star Leslie W., supra,*at 147-148; *Matter of Tiffany D.,*217 AD2d 968). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Ward, J. — Permanent Neglect.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
#### JOHN BLACKWELDER *vs.*JOHN FISHER.

If the subscribing witness toaninstrumentbecom.es interested and a party to a cause, even though be does so voluntarily, he cannot be examined as a witness. In such case the adverse party, if he wish to prove the instrument, may prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness; and if that cannot be done, proof of the handwriting of the person who executed the instrument, is admissible. If proof of neither can be obtained by disinterested witnesses, the party must resort to his bill of discovery in equity.

This was an action of trover for a horse. Plea — not guilty. Upon the trial at Rowan, on the last circuit, before his honor Judge Nash, the plaintiff set up title to the horse on the grounds: *First,*that his father was owner of the dam, and agreed with him, that if he would pay the price of putting the mare to the horse, he should have the foal, and that *205he had done so: Secondly, that after the mare had foaled, his father made a parol gift of the colt to him. The .... .1 G. .. , , , ant, admitting the conversion of the property, denied the plaintiff’s title, stating that the father of the plaintiff was in insolvent circumstances at the time of the gift, and had subsequently made an assignment of all his property, by deed, to the defendant and others, to satisfy his debts, and that the horse in question wás included in the deed of assignment. The plaintiff was the subscribing witness to the deed, and on the trial the defendant called on him as a witness. The evidence was objected to, but admitted by the Court. The defendant had a verdict and judgment, and the plaintiff appealed.

June 1839

*Boyden*for the plaintiff.

*D. F. Caldiuell*and *Barringer*for the defendant.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the case as above, proceeded as follows: It is a general rule of law, that a party to a suit cannot be a witness in it. This rule is not founded merely on the consideration of his interest.. The rule is partly, at least, founded on a principle of policy for the prevention of perjury, 2 Stack. Ev. 580. If the attesting witness to an instrument has become interested and a party to a cause, even though he disqualify himself voluntarily, still, if his adversary wishes to prove the instrument, the handwriting of the subscribing witness may be proved; and if that cannot be done, proof of the handwriting of the person who executed the instrument is admissible. If proof of neither can be obtained by disinterested witnesses, the party must resort to his bill of discovery in equity: The answer then is evidence as an admission, 1 Stark. Ev. 5 (American edition) 325, 326; and the cases there referred to. There must be a new trial.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
#### Leigh R. HARLOW and Evelyn D. Harlow, petitioners, v. John B. SARGENT and Frederic D. Sargent.

No. 81-1570.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 19, 1982.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Denied.
# L_2015064EN.01003701.xml

| 7.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 64/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/37

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/381

of 17 February 2015

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (EUPOL COPPS/1/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP of 3 July 2013 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories, EUPOL COPPS (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 5 February 2015, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 16 February 2015 to 30 June 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 5 February 2015, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Rodolphe MAUGET as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 16 February 2015 to 30 June 2015.

| (3) | Council Decision 2014/447/CFSP (2) extended the duration of EUPOL COPPS until 30 June 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Council Decision 2014/447/CFSP (2) extended the duration of EUPOL COPPS until 30 June 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Rodolphe MAUGET is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS for the period from 16 February 2015 to 30 June 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 16 February 2015.

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 12.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2014/447/CFSP of 9 July 2014 amending Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (OJ L 201, 10.7.2014, p. 28).

2

---
Diflubenzuron Focus Meeting Summary

August 22, 2012 

1:00 – 2:00 pm

Objective

The purpose of the meeting was for members of the Environmental Protection Agency Office of 

Pesticide Programs’ Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (PRD), Environmental Fate and Effects 

Division (EFED), Health Effects Division (HED), Biological and Economic Analysis Division 

(BEAD), and Registration Division (RD) to meet with Chemtura Corporation (Chemtura), a 

technical registrant for diflubenzuron, to get a better understanding of the need for and scope of a 

residential exposure assessment during registration review. 

Attendees

Chemtura (via conference call): Kevin Donovan, Judy Ball

EPA: Steven Snyderman (PRD), Avivah Jakob (PRD), Tracy Perry (PRD), John Hebert (RD), 

Autumn Metzger (RD), Sue Hummel (HED), James Miller (HED), Don Atwood (BEAD), John 

Faulkner (BEAD), Faruque Khan (EFED)

Discussion

In response to Agency questions regarding its diflubenzuron products, Chemtura detailed specific 

use information and gave a broader understanding of total U.S. usage of these non-agricultural 

products. The discussion covered: 1) non-agricultural uses, including better characterization of 

outdoor forest lands, standing water, tree shrub, recreational area, and ornamental plant uses (i.e.,

application rates, number of applications, acres treated, and timing of applications); and 2) the 

general usage of residential products registered for use on bird ponds, pool tarps, and as an 

impregnated wood termiticide. Of particular value was the applicator information on the residential 

uses for the EPA Reg. No. 400-543 label (i.e., bird ponds, fountains, small water gardens, pool tarps, 

and impregnated wood termite use). In addition, Chemtura explained its minor use products, 

including registered feed-through cattle labels.

Follow-up

Based on the discussion, the Agency concluded that a residential handler and post-application 

exposure assessment is needed in registration review. EPA will continue to work with Chemtura and 

other diflubenzuron registrants to clarify labels.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 182 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from using any 

type of fee collected to advertise or market Exchanges established under 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. MULLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from using any type of fee collected to advertise or 

market Exchanges established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Obamacare Spam 

5 Act of 2017’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 182 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF USE OF FEES TO ADVERTISE OR 

2 MARKET EXCHANGES UNDER PPACA. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act the Secretary 

5 of Health and Human Services may not use any fees col6 lected, including assessments and fees charged under sec7 tion 1311(d)(5)(A) of the Patient Protection and Afford8 able Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(d)(5)(A)), to advertise 

9 or otherwise market Exchanges established under such 

10 Act, including advertising or marketing qualified health 

11 plans offered through such Exchanges. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1

                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Omega Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence Hartman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Lawrence Hartman
Dated: April 4, 2003                            ----------------------------
                                                Lawrence Hartman
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
No. 86-968.

#### Geneva County Board of Education *v.*Hidle.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.