alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1,333,622
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           79,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                            508,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,921,704
<PP&E>                                               2,054,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (1,044,778)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,931,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  302,308
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                             17,822
<COMMON>                                                19,919
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,558,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,931,445
<SALES>                                                124,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       124,476
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       626,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      21,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (604,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (604,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (607,839)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      43,110,067
<SECURITIES>                                19,326,559
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,342,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                   435,000
<INVENTORY>                                    326,584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,738,516
<PP&E>                                      45,356,259
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,917,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             184,901,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,883,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,401
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,792,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               184,901,297
<SALES>                                      5,928,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,928,650
<CGS>                                        3,702,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,774,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,973,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,818,870)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,818,870)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,818,870)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.89)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0187. DAVID MCCLURE v. CHRIS MCCURRY, et al. 

On November 10, 2014, the trial court entered an order granting Defendants

Riverstone Professional Building, LLC and Chris McCurry’s motion for OCGA § 9-

15-14 attorney fees. Thirty-one days later, on December 11, 2014, David McClure

filed this application for discretionary appeal, seeking review of that order. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420

SE2d 393) (1992). The filing date of an application for discretionary appeal is

calculated from the date of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-

6-35 (a).Accordingly, McClure’s application for discretionary appeal is untimely and

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/19/2014

December 19, 2014
Exhibit 10(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 142 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305
on Form N-1A of our report dated November 24, 2010, relating to the financial
statements and financials highlights of BlackRock Asset Allocation Portfolio, a
series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of
BlackRock Funds for the year ended September 30, 2010, and to the references to
us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and  “Financial
Statements” in the Statement of Additional Information,  which are part of such
Registration Statement. 

 

/s/Deloitte
& Touche LLP 

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania  

    January
26, 2011
#### John D. Niles, Appellant, v Shue Roofing Company, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. J. V. Sgroi, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 464]

Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered September 30, 1994 in Madison County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiff was employed as a sheetrock finisher by third-party defendant, a subcontractor on a project at Cazenovia College in the Town of Cazenovia, Madison County. Defendant was the general contractor. Plaintiff, who was required to work at an elevated location on a ladder stationed on a jerry-rigged scaffold made of ladders, suffered injuries in an unwitnessed fall. He commenced this action alleging, *inter alia,*that his injuries resulted from violations of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of Labor Law § 240 (1) liability. Relying on *Carlos v Rochester Gen. Hosp.*(163 AD2d 894), Supreme Court denied the motion on the basis that the accident was unwitnessed and plaintiff’s accounts were not entirely consistent.

The fact that an accident was unwitnessed does not preclude summary judgment *(Morris v Mark IV Constr. Co.,*203 AD2d 922, 923; *Halkias v Hamburg Cent. School Dist.,*186 AD2d 1040, 1041). Plaintiff’s account of the accident was never challenged. The submissions made in opposition to the motion merely criticize plaintiff’s account as unwitnessed and unsubstantiated by independent sources. Hence, based upon the record before us, we find that defendant and third-party defendant have failed to set forth an articulable basis to disbelieve plaintiff *(see, Halkias v Hamburg Cent. School Dist., supra; Walsh v Baker,*172 AD2d 1038, 1040).

As to the issue of liability, Labor Law § 240 (1) requires that scaffolding and ladders "be so constructed, placed and operated as to give proper protection”. The proof establishes that the ladder fell while plaintiff was using it in the performance of elevated work resulting in his injuries. A college official, who *786arrived at the accident scene shortly after the occurrence, found planking and a stepladder on the floor in a manner suggestive of a collapse. Accordingly, we find that a prima facia showing has been made establishing a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) and that such violation was the proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries *(see, Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co.,*78 NY2d 509). As defendant and third-party defendant failed to thereafter make a showing sufficient to raise a triable issue *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557), we find that plaintiff should have been granted partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim *(see, Place v Grand Union Co.,*184 AD2d 817).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion granted and plaintiff is awarded partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# An Assessment of Fire Vulnerability for Aged Electrical Relays (NUREG/CR-6220,  SAND94-0769)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6220 (PDF - 2.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 1994****Date Published:****March 1995

**Prepared by:** R.A. Vigil (SEA) S.P. Nowlen (SNL)

Science and Engineering Associates, Inc. (SEA) 6100 Uptown Blvd, NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110-0737

Under Contract to: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-5800 Operated by Sandia Corporation

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC Job Code A1833

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report details testing to assess the impact of aging on the fire vulnerability of Agastat and General Electric relays. Both aged and unaged relays were tested. Aged relays were subjected to operational cycling under rated load and thermally aged for sixty days. All relays were exposed to one of three different fire temperature profiles in the Severe Combined Environments Test Chamber located at Sandia National Laboratories. The ability to operate properly in the given fire environment was monitored. Results for the aged and unaged relays were examined to determine the impact of aging on the relays' ability to sustain operation under the test conditions. Overall results indicated that the aged relays' performance was not significantly different from that of the unaged relays.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1730 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the 

protection of community centers with religious affiliation, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1730 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Religiously 

3 Affiliated Institutions Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELI5 GIOUS AFFILIATION. 

6 Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after 

9 ‘‘threat of force,’’ the following: ‘‘including by threat 

10 of force against religious real property,’’; 

11 (2) in subsection (d)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

13 the end; 

14 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

15 paragraph (5); and 

16 (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

17 following: 

18 ‘‘(4) if damage to or destruction of property re19 sults from the acts committed in violation of this 

20 section, which damage to or destruction of such 

21 property is in an amount that exceeds $5,000, a fine 

22 in accordance with this title and imprisonment for 

23 not more than 3 years, or both; and’’; and 

24 (3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the pe25 riod at the end the following: ‘‘, or real property 
3 

•HR 1730 EH

1 owned or leased by a nonprofit, religiously affiliated 

2 organization’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1730 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide 

gious affiliation, and for other purposes. for the protection of community centers with reli-
II 

Calendar No. 172 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1719 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2017 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 acres of land in Martinez, California, for inclusion in the John Muir National Historic Site, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Muir National 

5 Historic Site Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) HISTORIC SITE.—The term ‘‘Historic Site’’ 

9 means the John Muir National Historic Site in MarVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:59 Jul 13, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1719.PCS H1719

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1719 PCS

1 tinez, California, established by Public Law 88–547 

2 (78 Stat. 753). 

3 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en4 titled ‘‘John Muir National Historic Site Proposed 

5 Boundary Expansion’’, numbered 426/127150, and 

6 dated November 2014. 

7 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

8 the Secretary of the Interior. 

9 SEC. 3. JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE LAND ACQUI10 SITION. 

11 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may acquire by do12 nation the approximately 44 acres of land and any inter13 ests in the land that is identified on the map. 

14 (b) BOUNDARY.—On the acquisition of the land au15 thorized under subsection (a), the Secretary shall adjust 

16 the boundaries of the Historic Site to include the acquired 

17 land. 

18 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The land and any interests in 

19 land acquired under subsection (a) shall be administered 

20 as part of the National Historic Site. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 172 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1719 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to actional Historic Site, and for other purposes. California, for inclusion in the John Muir Na- quire approximately 44 acres of land in Martinez, 

JULY 13, 2017 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and planning meeting of the Montana Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. (MDT) on Thursday, February 12, 2015, in the Community Room of the Billings Public Library, 510 North Broadway, Billings, MT 59101. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to inform the newly appointed Committee members about the rules of operation of Federal advisory committees and to select additional officers, as determined by the Committee. The purpose of the planning meeting is to discuss potential topics that the Committee may wish to study.

                    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 13-201, Denver, CO 80294, phone 303-866-1040 and fax 303-866-1050, or email to Evelyn Bohor at                     *ebohor@usccr.gov.*

Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the word of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the above phone number, email or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provision of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated: January 22, 2015.

David Mussatt, 

Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2015-01386 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Guidelines for Inservice Testing at Nuclear Power Plants  (NUREG-1482)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USNS Mercy Arrives in Sri Lanka for Pacific Partnership 

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kelsey L. AdamsPacific Partnership Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
EXHIBIT
      32.2





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
      Dennis
      Harkins, President and Chief Financial Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the “Company”),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of the Company
      for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 (“the Company Form 10- K”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained
      in
      the Company Form 10- K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Dennis Harkins
              Dennis
                Harkins - President and Chief Financial Officer
            March
                31, 2008
                Date
#### Shefelker, Respondent, vs. First National Bank of Marion, Appellant.

*March 8*

April *5, 1932.*

*511The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *B. E. Meyer*of Marion and *Goggins, Brazeau & Graves*of Wisconsin Rapids, and for the respondent on that of *Eberlein & Larson*of Shawano.

Rosenberry, C. J.

Sec. 300.07 (5), Stats., provides:

> “Every justice of the peace shall keep a docket in which he shall enter in each case to which they relate: . . .

> “(5) Every adjournment, stating at whose request and to what time and place.”

.From *Roberts v.*Warren, 3 Wis. *736, 646, decided at the June term, 1854, down to the present time, it has been held by this court that failure of the justice of the peace to state the place to which adjournment is taken results in a loss of jurisdiction. In this case a very persuasive and moving argument is made that this long line of decisions should be overruled and that it should be held that, in the absence of any other place being stated, it should be conclusively presumed the adjournment is to the place named in the summons. The rule so long adhered to seems archaic and en*512tirely inconsistent with the liberal procedure in actions in court. We were prompted upon first consideration to yield to the defendant’s appeal, but upon reflection it is considered that a rule so long established and relied upon by the profession in general and by the plaintiff in this case ought not to be changed by decision. The rule is clearly established and is admittedly applicable to the facts in this case. Counsel for plaintiff, in reliance upon it, declined to participate. Had counsel for the defendant in this action, who was the plaintiff in the unlawful detainer action, accepted the situation and commenced over, there could have been only a short delay. Attempt of counsel for the defendant to create a situation which results in considerable hardship, great loss of time, and considerable financial loss cannot be a basis of an appeal here because it is a situation of its own creation. The equities in the case stand as they were when the plaintiff here declined to appear in the unlawful detainer action. Undoubtedly it would be in the interest of the administration of justice if the rule were changed, but it should be changed by legislative enactment. If we were at liberty to change it and have the change take effect only at the date of the decision and not in pending and in prior cases, we should do so. That, however, is beyond our power. The legislature may well retort that the rule is good as it stands but the construction placed upon it by the court is wrong. However, having been acquiesced in for nearly eighty years, the change should be made by the legislature without regard to who was at fault in the beginning for the reason indicated.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.