alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM A BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          53,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,039
<PP&E>                                          80,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,549
<BONDS>                                         70,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           465
<OTHER-SE>                                    (35,635)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,379
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (197,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Wolf Creek Generating Station (NUREG-1915)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1915 (PDF - 47.98 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed: ** October 2008**Date Published: ** October 2008

 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS), Unit 1, license renewal application (LRA) by the United States (US) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (the staff). By letter dated September 27, 2006, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC or the applicant) submitted the LRA in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, of the *Code of Federal Regulations*, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." WCNOC requests renewal of the WCGS operating license (Facility Operating License Number NPF-42) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration at midnight March 11, 2025.

WCGS is located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of Burlington, Kansas. The NRC issued the construction permit for WCGS on May 31, 1977, and operating license on June 4, 1985. WCGS Unit 1 is of a PWR design. Westinghouse Electric Corporation supplied the nuclear steam supply system and Daniel International originally designed and constructed the balance of the plant with the assistance of its agent, Bechtel. The WCGS Unit 1 licensed power output is 3565 megawatt thermal with a gross electrical output of approximately 1228 megawatt electric.

This SER presents the staff's review of information submitted through August 1, 2008, the cutoff date for consideration in the SER, and the final conclusion on the LRA review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffOffice of Investigations Annual Report (NUREG-1830)

# Office of Investigations FY 2015 Annual Report (NUREG-1830, Volume 12)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract 

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1830, Volume 12 (PDF - 5.83 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: February 2016

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission with an overview of the Office of Investigations' (OI's) activities, mission, and purpose, along with the framework of case inventory with highlights of significant cases that OI completed during fiscal year 2015 (reference Staff Requirements Memorandum COMJC-89-8, dated June 30, 1989). This is the 27th OI annual report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6959

WENDELL DAVID GRIFFIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK SIZER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-3669-CCB)

Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell David Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Griffin v. Sizer, No. CA-97-3669-CCB (D. Md. June 11,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7772]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length 
Painting,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Frick Collection, New York, New York, from on or about February 7, 
2012, until on or about May 13, 2012, the subsequent exhibition of two 
of the objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts, from 
on or about May 28, 2012, until on or about September 2, 2012, in an 
exhibition titled ``Visiting Masterpieces: Renoir,'' and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 12, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-1265 Filed 1-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Janel World Trade Ltd.
150-14 132nd Avenue
Jamaica, New York 11434

Gentlemen:

We have issued our report dated  November 22, 2004  accompanying  the  financial
statements of Janel World Trade Ltd. and subsidiaries contained in the Form 10-K
under the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We consent to the use of
the aforementioned  report in the Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  as  amended,  and to the use of our name as it  appears in Item 9 of Form
10-K.

                                                    /S/   PARITZ & COMPANY, P.A.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                          Paritz & Company, P.A.

Hackensack, New Jersey
December 28, 2004
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report. |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 24, 2012 | /s/ Charles C. Mottley  |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                               | Charles C. Mottley      |
|                               | Chief Executive Officer |

|   | /s/ John F. Stapleton   |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | John F. Stapleton       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 14.1

UNITEDGLOBALCOM, INC. GROUP OF COMPANIES

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior
Financial Officers

Amended and Restated March 11, 2004

UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. and its affiliates as defined in Rule 144(a)(1) of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 ("the Company") is committed to conducting
our business with honesty and integrity. Our Code of Business Conduct is intended to help all employees focus on the duty owed to each other, to the Company's stockholders and to others with whom the
Company does business and to conduct themselves honestly and ethically.

The
Company's Code of Business Conduct applies to all directors and employees of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Principal Accounting
Officer and other senior financial officers. In addition to being bound by the Code of Business Conduct's provisions about ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with law, the Company
has adopted the following Code of Ethics specifically for its Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers ("Senior Officers")

The
Company's Senior Officers will:

The
Senior Officers shall not take any action, directly or indirectly, to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead the Company or its subsidiaries' independent public
auditors for the purpose of rendering the financial statements of the Company or its subsidiaries misleading.

The
Senior Officers will be held accountable for adherence to this Code of Ethics. The failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics may result in disciplinary action, up to and
including termination of employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of law and may result in civil and criminal penalties. If a Senior Officer has any questions
regarding the best course of action in a particular situation, he/she should promptly contact the General Counsel. A Senior Officer may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible violation
of this Code of Ethics.

---

QuickLinks
#### Benjamin H. Martin v. John W. Williams ad'mr. of Alexander Latham,

*From Beaufort.*

An agent, who has given a receipt for a judgment and collected the amount of it, may be subjected in Assumpsit for money had and re*, ceived, without producing the judgment on the trial.

The Plaintiff declared in Assumpsit for money had and received, and on the trial, produced an accountable receipt given to hint by the Defendant’s intestate, for a Justice’s judgment against one *Bowen.*He. then proved by one *Judkins,*that the amount of ihe judgment liad been collected from *Buwen,*and paid to the Defendant’s intestate. The witness was ask' d what had become of the judgment, and answered that it had been delivered to *Bowen.*The Plaintiff’s Counsel admitted that he could not produce (he judgment, and that no attempt had been made to enable him todo so; whereupon bis honor Judge Strange, ruled that *Judkins’*testimony could not. go to the Jury in the absence of the judgment, unless that ah-*387sence was accounted for, and directed a iiousuit, from which the Plaintiff appealed.

*Hogg,*for the Plaintiff.

*Gaston,*contra.

Per Curiam

The substantial justice of the case is, that the Defendant’s intestate received the money claimed by the Plaintiff, and received it to his use; it was also received on account of the judgment against *Bowen,*a fact which could not be more satisfactorily established by the production of the judgment.’ But we cannot be ignorant of a very prevailing custom in the country, of surrendering magistrates’judgments to the debtor, upon their being paid *;*and in most cases it would be impossible ever to obtain possession of them again. Besides the Defendant ought not to insist upon the. production of it, after he had acknowledged the receipt of it, and must consequently have put it into *Judkins’*possession.

Let the judgment below be reversed.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00256-CR

CLAYTON EUGENE TURNER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F45450

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Clayton Eugene Turner pled guilty to the felony 

offense of assault-family violence, enhanced and sentenced to 10 years in prison. See

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(2)(A) (West 2011). His sentence was suspended and 

he was placed on community supervision for five years. After Turner committed new 

offenses and was unsuccessfully discharged from an intermediate sanction facility, the 

trial court revoked Turner’s community supervision and sentenced him to 10 years in 
Turner v. State Page 2

prison. Because Turner’s issues are not preserved for review, we affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

In two issues, Turner complains that the trial court’s sentence of 10 years violates 

the 8th Amendment’s prohibition to cruel and unusual punishments because it was 

grossly disproportionate to the crime (issue one) and the 14th Amendment’s due 

process provision because the trial court failed to consider the full range of punishment 

and assessed a predetermined sentence on revocation (issue two). See U.S. CONST. 

amends. VIII & XIV. However, Turner never objected to the sentence he received nor 

did he file a motion for new trial on the basis that his sentence violated the 8th or 14th

Amendments. Accordingly, we find that Turner’s complaints were not presented to the 

trial court and are not preserved for our review. TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 

State, 71 S.W.3d 346, 349 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Broxton v. State, 909 S.W.2d 912, 918 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (reviewing court will not consider errors, even of constitutional 

magnitude, not called to the trial court's attention). See also Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 

113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that complaint relating to constitutional 

prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment was waived when no objection on 

this basis was made in trial court); Hull v. State, 67 S.W.3d 215, 216-218 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2002) (same regarding due process complaint). Because Turner’s issues are not 

preserved, they are overruled. 
Turner v. State Page 3

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed September 12, 2013

Do not publish

[CR25]
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Literature Review and Assessment of Plant and Animal Transfer Factors Used in Performance Assessment Modeling (NUREG/CR-6825, PNNL-14321)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6825 (PDF - 13.1 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 2003**Date Published:**August 2003 

**Prepared by:** D.E. Robertson, D.A. Cataldo, B.A. Napier, K.M. Krupka, L.B. Sasser Pacific Northwest National Laboratory  P.O. Box 999 Richland, Washington 99352 

P.R. Reed, NRC Project Manager 

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6469 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A literature review and assessment was conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to update information on plant and animal radionuclide transfer factors used in performance-assessment modeling. A group of 15 radionuclides was included in this review and assessment. The review is composed of four main sections, not including the Introduction. Section 2.0 provides a review of the critically important issue of physicochemical speciation and geochemistry of the radionuclides in natural soil-water systems as it relates to the bioavailability of the radionuclides. Section 3.0 provides an updated review of the parameters of importance in the uptake of radionuclides by plants, including root uptake via the soil-groundwater system and foliar uptake due to overhead irrigation. Section 3.0 also provides a compilation of concentration ratios (CRs) for soil-to-plant uptake for the 15 selected radionuclides. Section 4.0 provides an updated review on radionuclide uptake data for animal products related to absorption, homeostatic control, approach to equilibration, chemical and physical form, diet, and age. Compiled transfer coefficients are provided for cows milk, sheeps milk, goats milk, beef, goat meat, pork, poultry, and eggs. Section 5.0 discusses the use of transfer coefficients in soil, plant, and animal modeling using regulatory models for evaluating radioactive waste disposal or decommissioned sites. Each section makes specific suggestions for future research in its area.

A compact disk (CD) is supplied with this report. The CD contains an electronic copy of this report in portable document format (PDF). The figures in this report have been printed in black and white; color versions of the figures are provided on the CD.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Stay America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  November 6, 2002                    /s/ GEORGE D. JOHNSON, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            George D. Johnson, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                    
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Levy Gerzberg                        
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer