alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Joseph D.Keegan, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Molecular Devices Corporation(the “Company”), and Timothy A. Harkness, the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2006, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the10th day of May, 2006       /s/ Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.   /s/ Timothy A. Harkness         Joseph D. Keegan, Ph.D.   Timothy A. Harkness  President and Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice      President Finance and Operations  “This Certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of Molecular Devices Corporationunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

51) ll-E-11 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet 51 of 264 
P.2 

#>/ - '/ 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

Date Company 

9-22-93 Structural North America 

Description: 

Contact 

Ken Ziernicky 

Phone 

(216) 286-4116 

Structural uses a water-based resin for spraying a binder for 

fabricated preforms. The company makes water tanks and hazardous waste 

tanks. This resin has been used for 2 or 3 years very successfully 

according to Structural. One half of the plant uses this process, the 

other half uses styrene-based resins; the facility does not intend to 

switch entirely to water-based resins. The reason for switching was to 

meet the Ohio EPA 8 lb/hr, 40 lb/day VOC limit. 

The process description and two suppliers of water based resins are 

in the PES CBI file (CN-N027-10). dc 

I °Tl 91995 l l 
P.3 

Docket No. 

Category <$ ~g 

The following infonnation is located in the confidential files of the 

Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, 

North Carolina 27711. This information is confidential pending final 

determination by the Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

<f//fcon: D. C'^S/jfmes, -/o k. Z><r>.'ek/t SA^AW 7 

/l/otih A">J<*')'o, dofft^ S>sp't*yr.t>/r-.ZZ).l142>. 

77?/ $ fsdrcen d*y./*;»s J)n]o^rr.a4>yOr1 a ho a/ Jy/?,s 

~f*lS feUo S*,ff*4>x*«t oJ /*i* U/*/*nr bAS^sf^Y^srtns, *f/r* ' ro#f/^'Ort/af 

I
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended  December 31, 2003 (the  "Report") of SMI Products,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James Charuk,  Chief Financial Officer of SMI Products,  Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.


Dated: March 30, 2004                           /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                               _________________________________
                                                    James Charuk
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO SMI PRODUCTS,  INC.,  AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY SMI PRODUCTS,  INC.,  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
No. 86-873.

#### Mazza *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

s0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146236 & (24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146236

COA: 308197

Calhoun CC: 2007-002155-FH

ANTHONY CLIFFORD GATES, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick G. Westerman III, Co-Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: April 28, 2005 |  | /s/FREDERICK G. WESTERMAN IIIFrederick G. Westerman III
Co-Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1760 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1760

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to eliminate the authority 
    of the Secretary of Agriculture to grant a waiver from the work 
requirements for participation in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
   program on account of an area's high unemployment rate or limited 
    employment availability for individuals who reside in the area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2017

 Mr. Grothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to eliminate the authority 
    of the Secretary of Agriculture to grant a waiver from the work 
requirements for participation in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
   program on account of an area's high unemployment rate or limited 
    employment availability for individuals who reside in the area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORK REQUIREMENTS BASED ON 
              UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OR JOB AVAILABILITY.

    (a) Elimination of Waiver Authority.--Section 6(o) of the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015(o)) is amended by striking 
paragraph (4).
    (b) Conforming Regulatory Change.--Not later than 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 
implement the amendment made by subsection (a) by revising section 
273.24 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, to remove subsection 
(f).
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Nonproliferation Considerations in the Licensing of Enrichment and Reprocessing Facilities (NUREG/BR-0519)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0519 (PDF – 1.42 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**May 2014

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Boil-Off Experiments with the EIR-NEPTUN Facility: Analysis and Code Assessment Overview Report (NUREG/IA-0040)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0040 (PDF 1.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 1992

**Prepared by:** S.N. Aksan, F. Stierli, G. Th. Analytis

Laboratory for Thermal-Hydraulics Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) 5232-Villigen PSI Switzerland

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The NEPTUN data discussed in this report are from core uncovery (boil-off) experiments designed to investigate the mixture level decrease and the heat up of the fuel rod simulators above the mixture level for conditions simulating core boil-off for a nuclear reactor under small break loss-of-coolant accident conditions.

The first series of experiments performed in the NEPTUN test facility consisted of ten boil-off (uncovery) and one adiabatic heat-up tests. In these tests three parameters were varied: rod power, system pressure and initial coolant subcooling. The repeatability of the experiments was also demonstrated.

The NEPTUN experiments showed that the external surface thermocouples do not cause a significant cooling influence in the rods to which they are attached under boil-off conditions. The reflooding tests performed later on indicated that the external surface thermocouples have some effect during reflooding for NEPTUN electrically heated rod bundle. Peak cladding temperatures are reduced by about 30-40°C and quench times occur 20-70 seconds earlier than rods with embedded thermocouples[1]. Additionally, the external surface-thermocouples give readings up to 20 K lower than those obtained with internal surface thermocouples (in the absence of external thermocouples) in the peak cladding temperature zone.

Some of the boil-off data obtained from the NEPTUN test facility are used for the assessment of the thermal-hydraulic transient computer codes. These calculations were performed extensively using the frozen version of TRAC-BD1/MOD1 (version 22). A limited number of assessment calculations were also done with RELAP5/MOD2 (version 36.02). In this report the main results and conclusions of these calculations are presented with the identification of problem areas in relation to the models relevant to boil-off phenomena. On the basis of further analysis and calculations done, changing some of the models such as the bubbly/slug flow interfacial friction correlation which eliminate some of the problems are recommended.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Gregoire, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Taleo Corporation on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Taleo Corporation.



|    |  |                                             |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Gregoire                       
|    |  | Name: Michael Gregoire                     
|    |  | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | Date: October 27, 2009                     

I, Katy Murray, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Taleo Corporation on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Taleo Corporation.



|    |  |                                                             |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Katy Murray                                            
|    |  | Name: Katy Murray                                          
|    |  | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | Date: October 27, 2009
#### John Findley, County Trustee, &c. v. William W. Erwin, Clerk, &c.

J>From Burke,

The removal of a prosecution from one county to another for trial, does not affect the right of the county in which the prosecution originated, to the fine imposed upon the defendant in case of conviction. For fines were given to the county to *defray*the expenses pf prosecution in cases of acquittal; and it necessarily follows, that the county which on an acquittal would have to pay the costs, shall nil a conviction have the fine.

A prosecution for a conspiracy was commenced in *the*Superior Court of Wilkes, and removed for trial to the county of Burke, where the defendants were convicted and fined £100, which sum was paid into the office of *245ilie Superior Court of law for Burke. This action was brought by the county Trustee of Wilkes, to recover the money for the use of that county.

IÍENDRiisoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

As the law is silent in the case of a prosecution removed from one county to another, in respect to the county entitled to the fine which may be imposed, we must have recourse to reason and construction, in order to decide the question. No doubt the fines were given to the county, to defray the expenses of those prosecutions, to which it was made liable in certain cases of acquittal, If that be correct, it follows that the county which would have been chargeable, in case of an acquittal, is entitled to the fine on conviction $ and that is the county in-which the offence was committed and in which the prosecution w-as commenced- Policy as well as justice seems to dictate this : policy, because it will make it the interest of a county, to suppress offences j justice, because those who originate a groundless prosecution ought to bear the cusís. The removal of the case to another county for trial cannot destroy that liability. We are, therefore, of opinion, that as the county of Wilkes, where'the prosecution was commenced would have been subject to the paymeñt of the costs of prosecution, if the defendants had been acquitted, it should have the fine imposed on their conviction.
No. D-1063.

#### In re Disbarment of Weiss.

It is ordered that Paul A. Weiss, of Garden City, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<PAGE>   1

                         [MOLECULAR DEVICES LETTERHEAD]

July 25, 2000

Patricia C. Sharp
320 Harding Avenue
Los Gatos, California 95032

Dear Pat:

Molecular Devices Corporation is pleased to confirm our verbal offer for the
salaried, exempt position of Vice President of Human Resources. In this position
you will report directly to me. This offer is contingent upon the successful
completion of professional references and background check.

Your base salary will be $15,416.66 per month ($185,000.00 per annum) payable
semi-monthly on the 15th and last day of each month. In addition, upon your
start date with MDC you will receive a bonus of $25,000. Upon the completion of
six (6) months satisfactory performance you will receive an additional $25,000.
You will also receive all the employment benefits available to regular full-time
employees of Molecular Devices.

As a member of the management staff, you will be eligible to participate in the
2000 MDC Executive Bonus Plan (bonus at Plan 40% prorated from time in
position).

You will be eligible to receive 47,500 Incentive Stock Options subject to the
approval of the Molecular Devices Board of Directors. These options will vest in
accordance with the Company's vesting schedule over a period of four (4) years,
and will be subject to the provisions of the Company's 1995 Stock Option Plan as
amended. In addition, you will receive 2,500 Restricted Options, which will vest
over two (2) years.

Upon your start date, as a condition of employment, you will be required to sign
an Employee Confidentiality and Inventions Agreement (copy of agreement
attached). Please review this agreement carefully; if you have any questions
regarding this agreement, please feel free to call me.

This offer is made contingent upon your ability to provide proof of
identification and authorization to work in the United States. Upon employment
at Molecular Devices, you will be required to furnish such documentation as
described in the enclosed materials.

<PAGE>   2

Page two
July 25, 2000


Additionally, this written offer constitutes all conditions and agreements of
Molecular Devices Corporation. Upon acceptance of this offer, please sign, date,
indicate your start date, and return this letter and the enclosed Application
Form to the Human Resources Department. However, if you have not responded to
this offer within five (5) days of receipt the offer will be withdrawn.

Pat, Molecular Devices Corporation is facing many exciting challenges as we
continue to grow. Your experience and talents will be strong additions to our
company and the Leadership Team. We are looking forward to having you join our
team.

Sincerely,

MOLECULAR DEVICES CORPORATION


/s/ JOSEPH D. KEEGAN
-------------------------------------
Joseph D. Keegan
President and Chief Executive Officer



Attachments

Accepted: /s/ PATRICIA SHARP
         ----------------------------
Date: 7/30/00
     --------------------------------
Start Date: 9/5/00
           --------------------------

JK/jd
#### In re DAVID-HODOSH CO., INC., Bankrupt.

Bankruptcy No. 78-408.

United States Bankruptcy Court, Rhode Island.

July 30, 1984.

ORDER

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

In this “Old Act” case Allan M. Shine, Esq., the trustee, has collected, and either has distributed or will distribute approximately $59,000 to creditors. Of this amount, $50,736 has been paid to secured or priority creditors. Compensation has previously been awarded to Mr. Shine in this case as follows:

> Receiver’s Commission $ 41Y.04 (Allan M. Shine, Esq.)

> Attorney for Receiver 4,540.00 (Allan M. Shine, Esq.)

> Trustee’s Commission 1,301.20 (Allan M. Shine, Esq.)

> Attorney for Trustee 7,580.00 (Allan M. Shine, Esq.)

> plus expenses 588.08

> State Court Receiver 4,300.00 (Allan M. Shine, Esq.)

> TOTAL FEES AND EXPENSES AWARDED TO ALLAN M. SHINE, ESQ.: $18,726.32

General creditors, whose claims total $881,746, have received nothing yet, and will receive a first and final dividend of 0.84% if the single remaining fee application is allowed as requested. Obviously, not much can be done for general creditors at this stage of the case, with a pending fee application of only $1,875 at the end of this old case, and although the amounts presently under consideration are not significant or large, we write this to emphasize and remind counsel that the size of the estate and the result for creditors are factors that should not be overlooked in the preparation of fee applications.

The prior awards in this ease are disproportionate to the size of the estate or to the dividend to general creditors, and have some unfortunate similarities to those in *National Finance Corporation,*another “Old Act” case in which this Court has recently discussed the criteria for the award of fees in such circumstances. *See*Decision on Application for Fees, *In re National Finance Corp.,*41 B.R. 329 (Bankr. D.R.I.1984), dealing at length with size of the estate, and benefit to creditors.

The reasons for reducing the requested compensation in this case are similar to those stated in *National Finance Corporation,*and need not be reiterated here. The Court would add only the comment that in this District future applications for interim fees should provide specific projections vis-a-vis the anticipated fate of creditors at the conclusion of the case, with sufficient detail to support said projections. In the absence of such information the Court cannot, and therefore will not, *334attempt to determine whether, or in what amount, interim compensation should be awarded.

For the reasons stated here and in *National Finance Corporation,*it is ORDERED that compensation is allowed as follows:

> Attorney for the trustee Requested: $1,875.00

> Allowed: 875.00

> Attorney for the trustee — expenses Requested: $ 117.50

> Allowed: ■ 117.50

> Trustee’s Maximum Statutory Allowance: $ 97.58

> Allowed: 97.58
No. 830, Misc.

*David Kanner*for petitioners. *W. Laird Stabler, Jr.,*Deputy Attorney General of Delaware, fur respondent.

#### Schaffer et al. *v.*Delaware.

Supreme Court of Delaware. Certiorari denied.