alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(i).2

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

I, Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer and Principal Financial
Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Husker Ag, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006.



|    |  |                                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert E. Brummels                                                  
|    |  | Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 188 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 188

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2027 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to extend 
   to 2027 the production certificate program that allows refunds of 
     duties on certain articles produced in United States insular 
                              possessions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PRODUCTION CERTIFICATE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN 
              PRODUCTS OF UNITED STATES INSULAR POSSESSIONS.

    Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting ``and 2017 
through 2027'' after ``2015''.
                                 <all>
```
Written Description of the employment arrangement with Dennis Nelson



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Description of Employment Agreement with Dennis Nelson 
 The following is a
description of the material terms of the employment arrangement with Dennis Nelson. Mr. Nelson is the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc., (the “Company”). His employment arrangement is not contained
in any formal document. Mr. Nelson’s employment with the Company provides for standard employee benefits and an annual base salary of $175,000 and a performance-based bonus as prescribed by the Compensation Committee—under the
Company’s 2010 Cash Bonus Plan. 
 Mr. Nelson is an “at will” employee, and we can terminate his employment
at any time, with or without cause. Similarly, Mr. Nelson may terminate his employment at any time. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a “change in control” benefit for
Mr. Nelson which provides that if the Company terminates Mr. Nelson’s employment other than for cause in connection with a “change of control,” the Company is obligated to pay him 6 months of salary continuation and
benefits.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

REGINALD BREW,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00105

- CR

Appeal from the

272nd District Court

of Brazos County, Texas

(TC# 13

- 01423

- CRF

- 272)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore

dismiss the appeal We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Review of Large-Scale Fracture Experiments Relevant to Pressure Vessel Integrity Under Pressurized Thermal Shock Conditions (NUREG/CR-6699)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6699 (PDF - 2.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2000**Date Published:** January 2001

**Prepared by:** C.E. Pugh, B.R. Bass

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8063

S.N. Malik, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6479

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Numerous large-scale fracture experiments have been performed over the past thirty years to advance fracture mechanics methodologies applicable to thick-wall pressure vessels. This report first identifies major factors important to nuclear reactor pressure vessel (RPV) integrity under pressurized thermal shock (PTS) conditions. It then covers 20 key experiments that have contributed to identifying fracture behavior of RPVs and to validating applicable assessment methodologies. The experiments are categorized according to four types of specimens: (1) cylindrical specimens, (2) pressurized vessels, (3) large plate specimens, and (4) thick beam specimens. These experiments were performed in laboratories in six different countries. This report serves as a summary of those experiments, and provides a guide to references for detailed information.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27892]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 752 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-441, K2025-438.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27892 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

July 29, 2010

Ms. Karen Magliano, Manager

Air Quality Data Branch

Planning and Technical Support Division

Air Resources Board

California Environm ental Protection Agency

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Ms. Magliano:

Thank you for your submission of the Exceptional Events Demonstration for High Ozone

in the Sacramento Regional Nonattainment Area Due to Wildfires, dated September 17, 2009.

This demonstration requests the exclusion of twenty

- three 1

- hour ozone exceedances (covering

five different monitors and six different days) due to influence of wildfire emissions. We

appreciate the effort you, your staff, and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management

District ( AQMD ) have invested in developing an approach to document flagged exceedances in

accordance with the Exceptional Events Rule (EER), and we look forward to working with you

to further develop this approach to meet the requi rements of the EER while also making effective

use of our collective resources.

Th e documentation you have provided contain s information that is useful supporting

evidence that the wildfires caused these exceedances, but does not yet fully meet the

requ irements of the EER under 40 CFR Part 50.14. Our primary concerns include the following:

1. The documentation focuses on fire’s effect on smoke and on PM 2.5 at the monitors

more than on ozone, the object of the request. For example, we would expect your

doc umentation to include a unifying conceptual model of the ozone episode that

relates the exceptional event (wildfire) to the monitored exceedance (high ozone)

. Both this qualitative explanation of the general causal relationship and supporting

data from th e site ( e.g. pollutant ratios and diurnal pattern comparisons) are

necessary.

2. The demonstration should compare and contrast the exceedance days with similar

days, typical high ozone days not affected by fires, and perhaps even other non

exceeding nearby monitors to provide evidence that the fire was an exceptional

cause of the ozone exceedance, more likely than other scenarios.Enclosed with this letter are EPA’s comments on the exceptional event package,

including requests for specific information that would address the concerns and work towards

satisfying the rule requirements

. We look forward to discussing these comments and other

aspects of this review with you and your staff in person on August 17.

We appreciate your willingness to work closely with us on this challenging issue. If you

have any questions regarding this letter in the meantime, please feel free to contact me at (415)

972

- 3851 or Kate Hoag of my staff at (415) 972

- 3970.

Sincerely,

/s/

Matthew Lakin

Manager , Air Quality Analysis Office

Enclosure

cc: Gayle Sweigert, California ARB

Brigette Tollstrup , Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Drug-Free Workplace Program (NUREG/BR-0135, Revision 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0135, Revision 3 (PDF - 564.97 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**April 2003

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

Achieving a drug-free America is one of our nation's highest priorities. President Reagan directed the Federal government to work toward a drug-free workplace and signed an Executive Order to assist in that effort. As a result of our national security and public health and safety responsibilities and the sensitive nature of our work, we at the NRC have a compelling obligation to detect and eliminate illegal drug use from our workplace. We can achieve that objective by increasing our understanding of the impact the use of illegal drugs will have on ourselves and our families, and by maintaining our commitment to counseling and rehabilitation. In this way, we uphold our responsibilities to ensure a drug-free workplace while protecting the rights and the dignity of the individual employee.

NRC developed a comprehensive Drug-Free Workplace Plan that includes extensive awareness and education opportunities for all employees, drug testing, counseling, and provisions for rehabilitation for employees who use illegal drugs. This brochure has been developed to provide general information and answer common questions employees may have regarding this plan. If you have any questions not addressed in this brochure, please obtain a copy of the NRC Drug-Free Workplace Plan (NUREG/BR-0134, Rev. 1) or call the Division of Facilities and Security, Office of Administration at 301-415-6546.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      16,881,412
<SECURITIES>                                48,997,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,308,558
<PP&E>                                      16,227,783
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,900,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,782,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,101,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        23,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,799,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,782,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,240,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,115,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             624,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,995,894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,995,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,995,894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-1139

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Lamonte Dior Dickens

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ 

Submitted: October 16, 2023

Filed: November 13, 2023

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

The district court1 sentenced Lamonte Dickens to 46 months in prison after 

he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1). He argues that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. 

1

The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of Iowa. 
-2- 

We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Harris, 960 F.3d 1103, 1106 

(8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Callaway, 

762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (stating that a within-Guidelines sentence is 

presumed reasonable). The record establishes that the district court sufficiently 

considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on 

an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. 

Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461–62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). In doing so, the court

specifically discussed several mitigating factors, but ultimately placed greater

weight on Dickens’s criminal history and resistance to rehabilitation. There was no 

abuse of discretion, see United States v. Keating, 579 F.3d 891, 893–94 (8th Cir. 

2009), so we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

______________________________
H. R. 1850 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 907 Fourth 

Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, as the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DONNA SAUERS BESKO POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# A Study of the Dispersed Flow Interfacial Heat Transfer Model of RELAP5/MOD2.5 and RELAP5/MOD3 (NUREG/IA-0163)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0163 (PDF 3.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 1999

**Prepared by:** M. Andreani* G. Th. Analytis S. N. Aksan

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In this work, the model of interfacial heat transfer for the dispersed flow regime used in the RELAP5 computer code is investigated. The validity of the 1-D approach used for calculating the heat exchange between the droplets and the vapour in the dispersed flow region above a quench front was shown to be questionable for conditions of low quality at the quench front and low mass flux. Under such conditions, the interfacial heat transfer calculated assuming a uniform distribution of droplets over the cross-sectional area of the channel is necessarily overpredicted, and the vapour superheat is strongly underpredicted. The purpose of the present paper is to show that the limitations of the 1-D approach, obtained from the steady-stare anlyses of slow reflooding experiments, has some impact on the performance of the 1-D transient computer codes like RELAP5/MOD2.5 and RELAP5/MOD3. As an example, the transient analysis of a low flooding rate experiment in a tube was performed. An early completion of the quench process and a fast desuperheating of the vapour at the tube exit was obtained by both codes. The too high quench front velocity (four times higher than in the experiment) could not, however, be put univocally in relation to the underprediction of the vapour temperature, and the consequent increase of the precursory cooling, as many coupled thermal and hydraulic transient effects prevailed. Quasi steady-state anlyses of two runs, where the boundary conditions for the the post-dryout region could be better controlled for a predetermined position of the quench front, were thus performed. These analyses show that the vapour superheat at the tube exit is strongly underpredicted, confirming the limitations of the 1-D model for interfacial heat transfer in the dispersed flow region.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021