alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 Hub International Limited
Subsidiaries as of 12/31/04 798676 Alberta Ltd.
    
    Alberta, Canada805977 Alberta Ltd.
    
    Alberta, CanadaAdvanced Benefit Resources, Corp.
    
    DelawareAg Specialty Group, LLC
    
    ColoradoAmerican Coverage Administrators, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeacon Underwriting Ltd.
    
    British Columbia, CanadaBlais Assurance & Gestion de Risques Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaBurnham Stewart Reinsurance Ltd.
    
    Turks & CaicosBush, Cotton & Scott, LLC
    
    WashingtonClaims Administration Corporation
    
    DelawareCross Border Underwriting Services Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaEBC, Inc.
    
    NevadaErnst-Roy Hobbs Inc.
    
    Quebec, CanadaGecko Reinsurance Company, Ltd.
    
    BermudaHub 724 Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareHub 724.com, Inc.
    
    DelawareHub Capital Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaHub Financial Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaHub Gibraltar
    
    GibraltarHub Hungary Liquidity Management Limited Liability Company
    
    HungaryHub Insurance Partners
    
    MassachusettsHub
International Barton Limited (Name changed
from Barton Insurance Brokers Ltd. effective
January 1, 2005)
    
    British Columbia, CanadaHub International (Brentwood) Ltd.
    
    British Columbia, CanadaHub International Group Northeast, Inc.
    
    DelawareHub International Limited
    
    Ontario, CanadaHub International New England, LLC
    
    MassachusettsHub International New England II, LLC
    
    MassachusettsHub International New England III, LLC
    
    MassachusettsHub International Northeast Limited
    
    DelawareHub International of California, Inc.
    
    DelawareHub International of Illinois Limited
    
    IllinoisHub International of Indiana Limited
    
    IndianaHub International Ontario Limited
    
    Ontario, CanadaHub International Quebec Limited (Name changed
from Martin Assurance & Gestion de Risques Inc.
effective January 1, 2005)
    
    Quebec, CanadaHub International (Richmond Auto Mall) Ltd.
    
    British Columbia, CanadaHub International TOS Limited
    
    British Columbia, CanadaHub Luxemburg
    
    LuxemburgHub U.S. Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareHubacq Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaMBA/BIG Management Partners LLC
    
    MichiganMichigan Bankers Insurance Center LLC
    
    MichiganPark Brokerage, Ltd.
    
    BermudaPension Services, Inc.
    
    New MexicoProgram Brokerage Corporation
    
    DelawareSatellite Acquisition Corporation
    
    WashingtonSpectrum Financial Services, Inc.
    
    MassachusettsTalbot Agency, Inc.
    
    New Mexico




---



##### 



Talbot Agency of Arizona, Inc.
    
    ArizonaTalbot  BHJ Insurance, Inc.
    
    WyomingTalbot Financial Corporation
    
    WashingtonTalbot Financial Services, Inc.
    
    WashingtonTalbot Financial Services of Hawaii, Inc.
    
    HawaiiTalbot Insurance Agency, Inc.
    
    WashingtonTalbot Insurance and Financial Services, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaTalbot  Northern New Mexico Insurance Agency, Inc.
    
    New MexicoThe Wholesale Insurance Group Inc.
    
    Ontario, Canada
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2022

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 04, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 04, 2023
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Commissioner Nils Diaz to Hold News Briefing Aug. 12 Following Visit to Dresden Nuclear Power Station

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-74

August 8, 1997

**NRC COMMISSIONER NILS DIAZ TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING AUG. 12 FOLLOWING VISIT TO DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION**

Commissioner Nil J. Diaz of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a briefing for news media representatives on Tuesday, August 12, following his visit to the Dresden Nuclear Power Station near Morris, Illinois.

The news briefing will be at 1:30 p.m. in the Training Facility at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station. The plant is located on Dresden Road north of Lorenzo Road in Grundy County, Illinois.

During his visit to the Dresden Station, Commissioner Diaz will meet with NRC regional staff members and the NRC resident inspectors, meet with plant management and staff, and tour the facility.

Dr. Diaz has been a member of the Commission since August of last year. He previously was a professor of nuclear engineering at the University of Florida and director of the Innovative Nuclear Space Power and Propulsion Institute, a national consortium of universities and industry.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             296
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,103
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         47,523
<ALLOWANCE>                                        217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,661
<DEPOSITS>                                      45,648
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                681
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  64,661
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,979
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  478
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,457
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,268
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,189
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    258
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       177
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   212
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  217
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               217
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XD660

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        NMFS published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 23, 2014, concerning an application from Point Blue Conservation Science (Point Blue) requesting an Incidental Harassment Authorization (Authorization) to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to conducting proposed seabird research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, Año Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central California from January 2015 through January 2016. The December 23, 2014 notice did not contain an ending date for the public comment period. This notice correctly identifies the end of the public comment period as January 23, 2015.                    

# DATES:

Comments must be received by January 23, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeannine Cody, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS (301) 427-8401.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 23, 2014, FR Doc. 2014-29991, on page 76975, in the second column, the                     **DATES**                     section was omitted and this correction has added it to inform the public of the comment end date.                

Dated: January 12, 2015.

Donna S. Wieting,

Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2015-01136 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1890

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to strengthen equal pay 
                             requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2017

Mr. Knight (for himself, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, and Mr. Young of Iowa) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to strengthen equal pay 
                             requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workplace Advancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT OF EQUAL PAY ACT REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 15(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
215(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; or''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) to discharge or in any other manner retaliate against 
        any employee because such employee has inquired about, 
        discussed, or disclosed comparative compensation information 
        for the purpose of determining whether the employer is 
        compensating an employee in a manner that provides equal pay 
        for equal work, except that this paragraph shall not apply to 
        instances in which an employee who has access to the wage 
        information of other employees as a part of such employee's job 
        functions discloses the wages of such other employees to an 
        individual who does not otherwise have access to such 
        information, unless such disclosure is in response to a charge 
        or complaint or in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, 
        hearing, or action under section 6(d), including an 
        investigation conducted by the employer.
Nothing in paragraph (6) shall be construed to limit the rights of an 
employee provided under any other provision of law.''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) gender-based discrimination in wages or compensation 
        violates existing law; and
            (2) Congress recommits itself to the principles of equal 
        pay for equal work as enshrined in section 6(d) of the Fair 
        Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d); commonly 
        referred to as the ``Equal Pay Act of 1963'') and title VII of 
        the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1821 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1821

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, 
                    frail, and at-risk individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mr. Barton (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 
  charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, 
                    frail, and at-risk individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Delivering Elderly Lunches and 
Increasing Volunteer Engagement and Reimbursements Act of 2017'' or the 
``DELIVER Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR DELIVERY OF MEALS TO 
              ELDERLY, DISABLED, FRAIL, AND AT-RISK INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``In the case of use of such an automobile for the delivery of meals to 
homebound individuals who are elderly, disabled, frail, or at risk, the 
mileage rate used shall be the standard business mileage rate specified 
by the Internal Revenue Service for the taxable year in which such 
miles are driven.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to miles driven on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ken$Carlson$

October$29,$2014$

Applying(Cost-Effective(Technology(

and(Strategies(For(Reusing(High(

TDS(Water(for(Hydraulic(Fracturing(
Treatment(Objectives(

5 Solids$removal$

5 Divalent$cation$removal$

5 Organic$compound$removal$

5 TDS$reduction$

Produced/Flowback(

Water(Quality(

5 Al,$Fe$

5 Ca,$Mg,$Ba,$Sr$

5 Na,$K$

5 Cl,$HCO3,$SO4$

5 TOC$

5 BTEX$

5 Bacteria$

Water(Quality((

Requirements(

5 Frac$water$use$

5 Agricultural$use$

5 Natural$water$

discharge$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Processes$

• Coagulation/settling/filtration$

• Softening/precipitation$

• Aerobic$degradation$

• Reverse$osmosis/distillation$

Treatment Process Objectives 

Usually choose beneficial use 

with lowest treatment $$ ? 
Generic Flow Schematic Water Management Logistics 

Minimum$$$$to$achieve$beneficial$reuse$of$water$

Pipelines$

Injection$ Storage$

Mobile$vs.$Fixed$
Flowback$Water$Reuse$Limitations$

QUANTITY$

Water$Demand$>$Water$Produced$

QUALITY$

Fresh/Recycle$Blend$WQ$<$Frac$Fluid$Requirement$

Water Systems Optimization 

Noble Energy/Colorado State University Modeling
0 

50 

100 

150 

200 

250 

0 

250 

500 

750 

1000 

1250 

1500 

1750 

2000 

2250 

2500 

2750 

3000 

3250 

3500 

3750 

4000 

0:00:00 0:05:00 0:10:00 0:15:00 0:20:00 0:25:00 0:30:00 0:35:00 0:40:00 0:45:00 

Viscosity. cP @ 40/sec 

Temperature, °F 

Elapsed Time, hr:min 

Water Quality Limits of Frac Fluids 

Noble Energy/Halliburton/CSU Testing

Sulfate$

0 

50 

100 

150 

200 

250 

0 

250 

500 

750 

1000 

1250 

1500 

1750 

2000 

2250 

2500 

2750 

3000 

3250 

3500 

3750 

4000 

0:00:00 0:05:00 0:10:00 0:15:00 0:20:00 0:25:00 0:30:00 0:35:00 0:40:00 0:45:00 

Viscosity. cP @ 40/sec 

Temperature, °F 

Elapsed Time, hr:min 

TDS$
Generic Flow Schematic Water Management Logistics 
Summary 

WQFrac 

Fresh Source 

Water 

Flowback$volume$(VFB)$

Flowback$water$quality$$

(WQFB)$

VFB 

WQFB 

Drilling/ 

Fracturing 

Injection 

Disposal well

Flowback

Water 

Treatment

VFrac 

WQFrac 

Frac$Volume$(VFrac)$

Adjust frac fluid and 

treatment for minimum 

$$$ 
• TDS$reduction$is$most$costly$treatment$objective$

• Strategies$exist$to$manage$TDS$during$reuse$in$DJ$

5 Dilution$

5 Frac$fluid$characterization$/$optimization$

• When$TDS$reduction$is$required,$RO$is$most$cost$

effective$for$DJ$(<35,000$mg/L)$

Summary
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-50016

AGAPE METRO HOUSING, INC; DOMICILE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC; PEPPERIDGE PARTNERS, LP

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(01-CV-978)

December 11, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :

Appellants Agape Metro Housing, Inc., Domicile Property

Management, Inc. and Pepperidge Partners, L.P. (collectively

“Agape”) filed suit in Texas state court against General Star

Indemnity Co. (“General Star”) alleging breach of contract, breach

of good faith, and violations of the Texas Insurance Code Articles2 G:\opin\02-50016.opn.hrd.wpd 21.21 and 21.55. The complaint stemmed from an insurance policy

issued by General Star to Agape for apartments located in San

Antonio, Texas. General Star removed the action to federal court

and Agape sought to remand the action back to state court pursuant

to a “service of suit” clause contained in the insurance policy.

The district court denied the motion to remand and sua sponte

dismissed the action on res judicata grounds because a federal

court had already entered a declaratory judgment as t o the

applicability of the insurance policy at issue as to Agape. Agape

now appeals.

Having carefully reviewed the record of this case and the

parties’ respective briefing, we conclude that the district court

did not err in denying Agape’s motion to remand to state court

and did not err in dismissing Agape’s claims sua sponte based on

res judicata. We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s decision.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 8.1



List of Subsidiaries



|Name                                     |  | Place of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.                |  | Republic of China     
|                                         | 
|ChipMOS Japan Inc.                       |  | Japan                 
|                                         | 
|ChipMOS USA Inc.                         |  | California, U.S.A.    
|                                         | 
|PlusMOS Technologies Inc                 |  | Republic of China     
|                                         | 
|ThaiLin Semiconductor Corp.              |  | Republic of China     
|                                         | 
|CHANTEK ELECTRONIC CO. LTD.              |  | Republic of China     
|                                         | 
|Advanced Micro Chip Technology Co., Ltd. |  | Republic of China
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50170 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELEUTERIO ZUBIA-MELENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-95-CR-37

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eleuterio Zubia-Melendez appeals the sentence he received subsequent to a guilty plea for reentry into the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Having reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, we find that the district court did not commit plain error in making its upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Rodriguez-Guzman , 56 F.3d 18, 20-21 (5th Cir. 1995).No. - 2 -
AFFIRMED.