alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Information on Hydrologic Conceptual Models, Parameters, Uncertainty Analysis, and Data Sources for Dose Assessments at Decommissioning Sites (NUREG/CR-6656, PNNL-13091)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6656 (PDF - 3.51 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 1999**Date Published:**December 1999

**Prepared by:**P.D. Meyer, G.W. GeePacific Northwest National LaboratoryP.O. Box 999Richland, Washington 99352

T.J. Nicholson, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Risk Analysis and ApplicationsOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6933

Availability Notice

## Introduction

This report addresses issues related to the analysis of uncertainty in dose assessments conducted as part of decommissioning analyses. The analysis is limited to the hydrologic aspects of the exposure pathway involving infiltration of water at the ground surface, leaching of contaminants, and transport of contaminants through the groundwater to a point of exposure. The basic conceptual models and mathematical implementations of three dose assessment codes are outlined along with the site-specific conditions under which the codes may provide inaccurate, potentially nonconservative results. In addition, the hydrologic parameters of the codes are identified and compared. A methodology for parameter uncertainty assessment is outlined that considers the potential data limitations and modeling needs of decommissioning analyses. This methodology uses generic parameter distributions based on national or regional databases, sensitivity analysis, probabilistic modeling, and Bayesian updating to incorporate site-specific information. Data sources for best-estimate parameter values and parameter uncertainty information are also reviewed. A follow-on report will illustrate the uncertainty assessment methodology using decommissioning test cases.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Investigations of the VVER-1000 Coolant Transient Benchmark I with the Coupled Code System RELAP5/PARCS (NUREG/IA-0217)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0217 (PDF - 2.65 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**December 2009

**Prepared by:** V. Sánchez-Espinoza Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen Germany

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the investigations performed to validate the coupled code RELAP5/PARCS using data of a pump restart-up test carried out at the Kozloduy nuclear power plant (KNPP). An integral plant model—including the relevant primary and secondary systems as well as a detailed model of the reactor pressure vessel and of the core—was developed for RELAP5 and PARCS to simulate the pump restart-up test. From the comparison of the thermal-hydraulic data obtained during the tests with the code's predictions, it can be stated that the overall trends of most plant parameters are in a reasonable agreement with the experimental data. The investigations have shown some limitations of 1D thermal-hydraulic coarse models of the downcomer, lower, and upper plenum. Hence, multidimensional thermal-hydraulic models are needed for a more realistic description of the coolant mixing phenomena within the reactor pressure vessel.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit
10.24**
 
 **Husker
Ag, LLC**
 **Director
Compensation Policy**
 
 
 The
Husker Ag, LLC Board of Directors has adopted a Board compensation policy,
pursuant to which directors are paid $200 per meeting, if the director is
present in person at the meeting through adjournment, otherwise the director is
paid $100 per meeting attended. Directors are paid $100 per committee meeting
attended in person and $50 per committee meeting attended via telephone
conference. Directors are also reimbursed at $0.405 per mile (as of January 1,
2005) for mileage reimbursement for travel to and from meetings.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Eric J. Sandman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

Date: May 10, 2006 

|   |                                                                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Eric J. Sandman                                                                   |   |
|   |  

 

Eric J. Sandman

 

 

Principal Financial Officer 

  |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1807 

To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 

certain water transfers between any of the States of Texas, Arkansas, 

and Louisiana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. GOHMERT (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

WESTERMAN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. RATCLIFFE, Mr. HIGGINS of 

Louisiana, Mr. BABIN, and Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain water transfers between any of 

the States of Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Water Supply 

5 Invasive Species Compliance Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1807 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WATER TRANSFERS FROM 

2 THE LACEY ACT AND THE LACEY ACT AMEND3 MENTS OF 1981. 

4 (a) EXEMPTION.—Section 42 of title 18, United 

5 States Code (popularly known as the Lacey Act), and the 

6 Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) 

7 shall not apply with respect to any covered water transfer, 

8 if— 

9 (1)(A) all prohibited species in the water trans10 ferred are located in both of the public water sup11 plies between which the water is transferred; and 

12 (B) the water is transferred directly between 

13 such public water supplies; or 

14 (2) the water is transferred in a closed convey15 ance system directly to treatment facilities where all 

16 prohibited species contained in the water transferred 

17 will be extirpated. 

18 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

19 (1) COVERED WATER TRANSFER.—The term 

20 ‘‘covered water transfer’’ means a transfer between 

21 public water supplies located on, along, or across the 

22 State boundaries between any of Texas, Arkansas, 

23 and Louisiana, of water containing a prohibited spe24 cies. 

25 (2) PROHIBITED SPECIES.—The term ‘‘prohib26 ited species’’ means any species— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1807 IH

1 (A) the shipment of which is otherwise 

2 prohibited by section 42 of title 18, United 

3 States Code; or 

4 (B) the transfer of which is otherwise pro5 hibited by the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 

6 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.). 

7 (3) PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY.—The term ‘‘public 

8 water supply’’ means any body of water, including 

9 any river, lake, or stream, the water of which is 

10 available or made available to the public. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Claudio M. Guazzoni, Chief Executive Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (“the Company Form 10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Company Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Claudio M. Guazzoni

May 2, 2011Claudio M. Guazzoni – Chief Executive Officer

Date
No. 90-489.

#### Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, et al. *v.*Crank.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Marius Silvasan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc.

Date:  March 31, 2005

                                        By:/s/ Marius Silvasan
                                        --------------------------
                                               Marius Silvasan
                                               Chief Executive Officer
No. 90-6616.

#### Stringer *v.*Black, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. [Certio-*1012rari granted, 500 U. S. 915.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Kenneth J. Rose, Esq., of Durham, N. C., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.
----

| Subsidiaries                (1)                                               | Percentage                of Ownership |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |                                   |
| First                National Bank, Ames, Iowa, a National Bank               | 100%                                   |
| Boone                Bank and Trust Co., Boone, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank      | 100%                                   |
| State                Bank & Trust Co., Nevada, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank   | 100%                                   |
| Randall-Story                State Bank, Story City, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank | 100%                                   |
| United                Bank & Trust NA, a National Bank                    | 100%                                   |

| (1) | The                operation of Ames National Corporation’s five wholly owned subsidiaries                are included in the financial statements set forth in this Form                10-K. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
No. 91-633.

#### Principal Financial Group, aka Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. *v.*Thomas.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Motion of American Council of Life Insurance et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED JULY 31, 1997  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF TREASURY
INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   689020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     457737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1193038
<PP&E>                                          662002
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5050815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2483048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1688
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2053347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5050815
<SALES>                                        1732035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1732035
<CGS>                                          1503933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1503933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                343149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               31333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (146380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (146380)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (2296204)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2442584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.148)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.148)

        

</TABLE>
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:12:11

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Millstone 2 Docket (050- 00336)

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering S - Surveillance 146 - Evaluation LTA S - Specialized task force W - Assessment 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

735

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR183 - Pre-job activities LTA O - Operations S - Surveillance 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA C - Chemistry Z - Other / Unknown 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations S - Surveillance 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations S - Surveillance 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

196 - Independent verification / plant tours LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 197 - Self-check LTA O - Operations S - Surveillance 

1155

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content I - Instrumentation & Control C - Calibration 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:12:11

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Millstone 2 Docket (050- 00336)

Work Planning & Practices / LER183 - Pre-job activities LTA I - Instrumentation & Control C - Calibration 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 20
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The Human Performance Evaluation Process: A Resource for Reviewing the Identification and Resolution of Human Performance Problems (NUREG/CR-6751)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6751 (PDF - 9.79 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript completed:** September 2001****Date Published:**** March 2002

**Prepared by:** Valerie E. Barnes, Brian C. Haagensen Performance, Safety and Health Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 30 Boalsburg, Pennsylvania 16827

John M. O'Hara (Contributing Author) Human Factors and Performance Analysis Group Energy Sciences and Technology Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 11973-5000

Isabelle Schoenfeld and Eugene A. Trager, NRC Project Managers

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6528

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Human Performance Evaluation Process (HPEP) is a resource for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors to use when reviewing licensee problem identification and resolution programs with regard to human performance. Part I provides a step-by-step process for reviewing licensee effectiveness in identifying, analyzing and resolving human performance problems. Part I also addresses the challenges in identifying and investigating human performance problems, describes three root cause analysis techniques, and discusses characteristics of effective corrective action plans. Part II is comprised of the HPEP Cause Tree and Modules. The Cause Tree is a screening tool for identifying the range of possible causes for a human performance problem. The Modules describe frequently identified causes for human performance problems and provide examples. Part II is intended to support the evaluation of licensee root cause analyses for human performance problems identified in Part I.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent the use of our reports dated March 14, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (“Oncolytics”), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Oncolytics, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”).


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-167250) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-171625) of our reports dated March 14, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of  Oncolytics, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting of Oncolytics, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC.





Calgary, CanadaSigned “Ernst & Young LLP”March 23, 2012Chartered Accountants
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Public Information Circular For Shipments of Irradiated Reactor Fuel (NUREG-0725,  Revision 15)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0725, Revision 15 (PDF - 1.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2010**Date Published:** May 2010

**Prepared by:** A.G. Garrett, S.L. Garrett, and R.G. Ostler

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

K. Jamgochian, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code N4104

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Security and .Incident Response U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides information on the shipment of irradiated reactor fuel (spent fuel) subject to regulation by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It briefly describes spent fuel shipment safety and safeguards requirements of general interest, summarizes data for highway and railway shipments from 1979 - 2007, and lists, by State, recent highway and railway shipment routes. This circular does not include Department of Defense and Department of Energy spent fuel shipments.

The enclosed route information reflects specific NRC approvals that the agency has granted in response to requests for shipments of spent fuel. This publication does not constitute authority for carriers or other persons to use the routes to ship spent fuel, other categories of nuclear waste, or other materials.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021