alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




LOOPNET, INC.




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT



     This Amendment No. 1 to Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Amendment No. 1”)
is made and entered into effective as of February 2, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), by and
between (the “Executive”) and LoopNet, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 1 but not
defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to them in that certain Change of Control Severance
Agreement dated as of ______________, by and between the Executive and the Company (the
“Agreement”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company previously entered into the Agreement, which is
scheduled to expire on December 18, 2011;



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) reviewed the terms of the
Agreement in connection with its annual review of executive compensation;



     WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders to extend the term of the Agreement in order to provide select members of Company
management, including Executive, with incentive to continue employment with the Company without
distraction in light of the possibility of a Change in Control and to motivate them to maximize the
value of the Company for the benefit of its stockholders;



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided below;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the
Company and the Executive hereby amend the Agreement and agree as follows.



ARTICLES




     1. Section 2. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety:




     “2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective until the earlier of the date
that (i) this Agreement is modified pursuant to Section 9(b), (ii) this Agreement is
terminated by mutual agreement of the Company and the Executive, and (iii) all of the
obligations of the parties hereto with respect to this Agreement have been satisfied.”



     2. Effect of Amendment. Except as and to the extent expressly modified by this Amendment No.
1, the Agreement and any exhibits thereto shall remain in full force and effect in all respects.



     3. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and
year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LoopNet, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	[Name of Executive] 	 
	 




2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Eric J. Sandman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 8, 2007

| |  | /s/ Eric J. Sandman        
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  |                            
| |  |                            
| |  | Eric J. Sandman            
| |  | Principal Financial Officer

---
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: February 23, 2011 | /s/ James N. Jannello                                           |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | James N. Jannello                                               |
|                     | Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer            |
|                     | (principal executive officer)                                   |
|                     |                                                            |
|                     |                                                            |
|                     | /s/ William J. Lally                                            |
|                     | William J. Lally                                                |
|                     | President and Chief Operating Officer                           |
|                     | (principal executive officer)                                   |
|                     |                                                            |
|                     |                                                            |
|                     | /s/ Philip J. Dubato                                            |
|                     | Philip J. Dubato                                                |
|                     | Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     | (principal financial officer)                                   |

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on 10-K/A-1 of DRAVCO MINING INC. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodney Lozinski,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
the financial condition and results of operations of all the
Company.











RODNEY
LOZINSKI


Rodney
Lozinski


Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer


August
10, 2009
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, that:
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen N. Joffe /s/ Alan Buckey   Stephen N. Joffe Alan BuckeyChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Review Plan for the Review of a License Application for the Tank Waste Remediation System Privatization (TWRS-P) Project (NUREG-1702, Final Report)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1702, Final Report (PDF 14.43 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2000**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** Tank Waste Remediation System Section Special Projects Branch

****Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This NUREG provides guidance to the NRC staff reviewers in the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards for the performance of safety and environmental reviews of a Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Facility under 10 CFR Part 701, as revised. The standard review plan (SRP) presented in this NUREG ensures the quality, uniformity, stability, and predictability of staff reviews. It presents a defined basis from which to evaluate proposed changes in the scope and requirements of the staff reviews. The SRP makes information about review acceptance criteria readily available to interested members of the public and the regulated industry. Each SRP section addresses the regulations pertinent to specific technical matters, the acceptance criteria used by the staff, how the review is accomplished, and the conclusions that are appropriate for the Safety Evaluation Report (SER).

----

1Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S.) Washington, D.C. "Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material (10 CFR Part 70)." *Federal Register*: Vol. 64, No. 146. pp. 41338-41357. July 30, 1999.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes of
complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: April 26, 2013



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFirst American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 9thday of May, 2007.

CALVIN L. KANTONENCalvin L. KantonenChief Financial Officer


































---
No. A-372.

#### Vasquez, Warden *v.*Harris.

Application to vacate the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granting a stay of mandate, presented to Justice O’Connor, and by her referred to the Court, denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2682
BARBARA HOFFMANN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL HOFFMANN; JOSEPH ROUSE; PAT BELL, States Attorney; STATE OF MARYLAND; JUDGE MANAK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 3031-AMD) Submitted: January 21, 1997 Decided: February 6, 1997 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Hoffmann, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L.No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321,Appellant's personal injury claim and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, weaffirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoffmann v. Hoffmann , No. CA-96-3031-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 21 and Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Millar, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellant, vs. Waukegan National Bank, imp., Respondent.

*February 9*

March *8, 1927.*

This case is ruled by *First State Bank of Harvard v. Harrington, ante,*p. 293.

Appeal from an order and a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha county: E. B. Belden, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action by a trustee in bankruptcy to vacate a judgment of foreclosure of a real-estate mortgage on the ground that the mortgagee was a foreign corporation that had not complied with the provisions of sec. 226.02, Stats. It was stipulated in this court that the complaint be held to allege that the loaning of the money and the delivery of the mortgage in question took place at Waukegan, Illinois.

The defendant demurred to the complaint. From an order sustaining the demurrer the plaintiff appealed.

*297For the appellant there were briefs by *Alfred C. Boehm*and *Buckmaster & Hammond,*all of Kenosha, and oral argument by *Mr. W. W. Hammond*and *Mr. Boehm.*

For the respondent there were briefs by *Clarence J. Fisher*and *Roy S. Stephenson,*both of Kenosha, and oral argument by *Mr. Stephenson.*

Vinje, C. J.

Assuming, but not deciding, that such an action will lie by the trustee in bankruptcy, the case is ruled by that of *First State Bank of Harvard v. Harrington, ante,*p. 293, 212 N. W. 665.

*By the Court.*— Order and judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

YAACOV BENAROSH AND BATYA 

BENAROSH,

Petitioners

v.

MICHAEL AXELROD AND JOAN 

AXELROD, INDIVIDUALLY, HIS HEIRS 

AND ASSIGNS, AND AS TRUSTEES OF 

THE MICHAEL AXELROD 2012 

IRREVOCABLE TRUST, TRIAD REALTY, 

MARLENE ZARRETT AND BARE FEET 

SHOES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 48 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2010 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann  |  | 
|                       |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann      |  | 
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInterim Staff Guidance

# Interim Staff Guidance Associated with Digital Instrumentation & Controls

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2023
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1713 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the essential air service 

program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. PALMER, and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the 

essential air service program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Market Flights 

5 Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE PRO7 GRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 417 of 

9 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1713 IH

1 ‘‘§ 41749. Termination of essential air service pro2 gram 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The authority of the Secretary 

4 of Transportation to carry out the essential air service 

5 program under this subchapter shall terminate on October 

6 1, 2017. 

7 ‘‘(b) USE OF FEES FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For fiscal years beginning 

9 after September 30, 2017, amounts credited to the 

10 account established under section 45303 from over11 flight fees authorized under section 45301(a)(1) that 

12 would otherwise be made available under section 

13 41742 for obligation and expenditure to carry out 

14 the essential air service program under this sub15 chapter shall be deposited in the general fund of the 

16 Treasury and shall be used for the sole purpose of 

17 deficit reduction. 

18 ‘‘(2) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Paragraph 

19 (1) shall apply notwithstanding any provision of sec20 tion 45303(c) that directs the amounts described in 

21 paragraph (1) to be made available for expenditure 

22 for activities of the Federal Aviation Administra23 tion.’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap25 ter 417 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1713 IH

1 inserting after the item relating to section 41748 the fol2 lowing: 

‘‘41749. Termination of essential air service program.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

|CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS  | 1100  1177 West Hastings Street | 
|--------------------- | -------------------------------- | 
|Vancouver, BC V6E 4T5
|Tel: (604) 687-4511  
|                      | Fax: (604) 687-5805              | 
|MacKay LLP            | Toll Free: 1-800-351-0426        | 
|                      | www.MacKayLLP.ca                 | 

Exhibit 99.8

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F of our audit report dated August 26, 2011 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the
Company) for each of years in the three year period ended May 31, 2011 and to
the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report on Form 40-F, together with
our audit report contained herein, in the Companys Form S-8 Registration
Statement (SEC File No. 333-158533).

/s/ MacKayLLP

Chartered Accountants Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  August 26, 2011

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOHN B . R

AM IREZ, a

ka Johnny R

hondo, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, JUANDA K. ANDER SON; PR O B USINESS C OAC H, INC ., Pe titioners - Appe lla nts, v. UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, R

e sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 14-56604

D.C . No. 8:14-c v-00581-JLS-AN M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Jose phine L. Staton, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, C ALLAHAN, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. 

# F IL ED MAY19 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).John B . R am ire z , ak a Johnny R hondo, a nd Jua nda K. Ande rson a

ppe a l pro se from the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing for lac k of jurisdic tion the i r am e nde d pe tition to qua sh Inte rna l R e ve n ue Se rvic e (IR S) sum

m onse s issue d to third-pa rty fina nc ia l institutions. W

e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo, Se rra v . Lappin , 600 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d the pe tition for lac k of jurisdic t ion be c a use Appe lla

nts fa ile d to m a il the ir pe t ition to the sum m one d fina

nc ia l institutions. S

e e26 U.S.C . § 7609(b)(2)(B ) (any pe rson who brings a

proc e e ding to qua sh a

sum m ons “ sha ll m a il by

re giste re d

or c e rtifie d m a il a

c opy of the pe tition to the

pe rson sum

m o ne d” ); 26 C .F.R . § 301.7609–4(b)(3) (“ If a pe rson e ntitle d to notic e of the sum m ons fa ils to give

prope r and tim e l y notic e to e ithe r the sum m one d pe rson or the IR S . . . , tha t pe rson ha s fa ile d to institute a proc e e ding to qua sh a nd the distric t c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion to he ar the proc e e ding.” ); Mollison v. Unite d State s , 568 F.3d 1073, 1075 (9th C ir. 2009) (§ 7609(b)(2) is the gove rnm e nt’ s c o nse nt to wa ive sove re ign im m unity , a n d the gove rnm e nt’ s c onditions on c onse nt m

ust bestric tly

obse rve d; c ourts la c k jurisdic tion unle ss c la im s m e e t te rm s of wa ive r). W e re je c t Appe lla

nts’ c onte ntions tha

t the y we re im prope rly se rve d with the

1 4 - 5 6 6 0 4 2sum

m onse s, a nd tha t the distric t c ourt should ha v e c onduc te d a

n e vide ntia

ry he aring. W e do not c onside r argum e nts a n d a l le gations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). Appe lla nts’ m o t ion to c onsolida

te , se t forth in the ir ope n ing brie f, is de nie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 6 6 0 4 3