Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Personnel Management 5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AN15
 AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
 ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of the Jacksonville, FL; Savannah, GA; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; and Roanoke, VA, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. The proposed rule would redefine Brantley, Glynn, and Pierce Counties, GA, from the Jacksonville wage area to the Savannah wage area; Greene County, VA, from the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg wage area to the Richmond wage area; and Nelson County, VA, from the Roanoke wage area to the Richmond wage area. These changes are based on recent consensus recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC) to best match the counties proposed for redefinition to a nearby FWS survey area.
 DATES: We must receive comments on or before March 4, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by “RIN 3206-AN15,” using any of the following methods: *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.*
                         Follow the instructions for submitting comments. *Mail:*
                         Brenda L. Roberts, Deputy Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200. *Email: pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.*
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; email 
                        *pay-leave-policy@opm.gov;*
                         or FAX: (202) 606-4264.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is issuing a proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of the Jacksonville, FL; Savannah, GA; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; and Roanoke, VA, appropriated fund FWS wage areas. The proposed rule would redefine Brantley and Glynn Counties, GA, from the Jacksonville wage area to the Savannah wage area; Greene County, VA, from the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg wage area to the Richmond wage area; and Nelson County, VA, from the Roanoke wage area to the Richmond wage area. OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS wage area boundaries: (i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; (ii) Commuting patterns; and (iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances. OPM recently completed reviews of the definitions of the Brunswick, GA and Charlottesville, VA MSAs and, based on analyses of the regulatory criteria for defining wage areas, is proposing the changes described below. FPRAC, the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, recommended these changes by consensus. These changes would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations. Brunswick, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area Brantley, Glynn, and McIntosh Counties, GA, comprise the Brunswick, GA MSA. The Brunswick MSA is currently split between the Jacksonville, FL, and Savannah, GA, wage areas. Brantley and Glynn Counties are part of the area of application of the Jacksonville wage area and McIntosh County is part of the area of application of the Savannah wage area. Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for Glynn County, the core county in the Brunswick MSA, we recommend that the entire Brunswick MSA be defined to the Savannah area of application. When measuring to cities, the distance criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. When measuring to host installations, the distance criterion favors the Savannah wage area more than the Jacksonville wage area. The commuting patterns criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. Glynn County does not resemble one survey area more than another survey area in terms of the overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criteria. Based on this analysis, we find that Glynn County would be more appropriately defined to the Savannah wage area. Since there appear to be no unusual circumstances that would permit splitting the Brunswick MSA, OPM proposes to redefine Brantley and Glynn Counties to the Savannah wage area so that the entire Brunswick MSA is in one wage area. The remaining county in the Brunswick MSA, McIntosh County, is already defined to the Savannah wage area. There are currently no FWS employees working in Brantley County. There are currently 45 FWS employees working in Glynn County. Because Pierce County, GA, borders Brantley County to the northwest and is located  in-between the Brunswick MSA and the Albany, GA, and Savannah wage areas, Pierce County would also be redefined from the Jacksonville wage area to the Savannah wage area. When measuring to cities, the distance criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. When measuring to host installations, the distance criterion favors the Savannah wage area more than the Albany wage area. The commuting patterns criterion does not favor one wage area more than another. Pierce County does not favor one survey area more than another survey area in terms of the overall population and employment and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criteria.
                    ( print page 5488) Based on this analysis, we find that Pierce County would be more appropriately defined to the Savannah wage area. There are currently no FWS employees working in Pierce County. Charlottesville, VA Metropolitan Statistical Area Charlottesville City, VA, and Albemarle, Buckingham, Fluvanna, Greene, and Nelson Counties, VA, comprise the Charlottesville, VA MSA. The Charlottesville MSA is split between the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, Richmond, VA, and Roanoke, VA, wage areas. Greene County is part of the area of application of the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg wage area. Charlottesville City and Albemarle, Buckingham, and Fluvanna Counties are part of the area of application of the Richmond wage area. Nelson County is part of the area of application of the Roanoke wage area. Based on an analysis of the regulatory criteria for Greene County, the core county in the Charlottesville MSA, the entire Charlottesville MSA would be defined to the Richmond wage area. The distance criterion favors the Richmond wage area. The commuting patterns criterion slightly favors the Richmond wage area. The overall population and employment and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments criteria do not favor one wage area more than another. Based on this analysis, we find that Greene County would be more appropriately defined to the Richmond wage area. Since there appear to be no unusual circumstances that would permit splitting the Charlottesville MSA, OPM proposes to redefine Greene and Nelson Counties to the Richmond wage area so that the entire Charlottesville MSA is in one wage area. The remaining city and counties in the Charlottesville MSA, Charlottesville City and Albemarle, Buckingham, and Fluvanna Counties, are already defined to the Richmond wage area. There are currently three FWS employees working in Greene County. There are currently no FWS employees working in Nelson County. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure
Freedom of information
Government employees
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Wages
 U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Katherine Archuleta, Director.
 Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
 1.The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                    5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 2.Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listings for the Jacksonville, FL; Savannah, GA; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; and Roanoke, VA, wage areas to read as follows: Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 
 **FLORIDA***    *    *    *    ***Jacksonville***Survey Area*Florida:AlachuaBakerClayDuvalNassauSt. Johns*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Florida:BradfordCitrusColumbiaDixieFlaglerGilchristHamiltonLafayetteLakeLevyMadisonMarionOrangeOsceolaPutnamSeminoleSumterSuwanneeTaylorUnionVolusiaGeorgia:CamdenCharlton*    *    *    *    ***GEORGIA***    *    *    *    ***Savannah***Survey Area*Georgia:BryanChathamEffinghamLiberty*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Georgia:ApplingBaconBrantleyBullochCandlerEvansGlynnJeff DavisLongMcIntoshPierceScrevenTattnallToombsWayneSouth Carolina:Beaufort (the portion south of Broad River)HamptonJasper*    *    *    *    ***MARYLAND***    *    *    *    ***Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg***Survey Area*Maryland:WashingtonPennsylvania:FranklinWest Virginia:Berkeley*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Maryland:AlleganyGarrettPennsylvania:FultonVirginia (cities):HarrisonburgWinchesterVirginia (counties):FrederickMadisonPageRockinghamShenandoahWest Virginia:HampshireHardyMineralMorgan*    *    *    *    ***VIRGINIA***    *    *    *    ***Richmond***Survey Area*Virginia (cities):Colonial Heights( print page 5489)HopewellPetersburgRichmondVirginia (counties):Charles CityChesterfieldDinwiddieGoochlandHanoverHenricoNew KentPowhatanPrince George*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Virginia (cities):CharlottesvilleEmporiaVirginia (counties):AlbemarleAmeliaBrunswickBuckinghamCarolineCharlotteCumberlandEssexFluvannaGreeneGreensvilleKing and QueenKing WilliamLancasterLouisaLunenburgMecklenburgMiddlesexNelsonNorthumberlandNottowayOrangePrince EdwardRichmondSussexWestmoreland**Roanoke***Survey Area*Virginia (cities):RadfordRoanokeSalemVirginia (counties):BotetourtCraigMontgomeryRoanoke*Area of Application. Survey area plus:*Virginia (cities):BedfordBuena VistaClifton ForgeCovingtonDanvilleGalaxLexingtonLynchburgMartinsvilleSouth BostonStauntonWaynesboroVirginia (counties):AlleghanyAmherstAppomattoxAugustaBathBedfordBlandCampbellCarrollFloydFranklinGilesHalifaxHenryHighlandPatrickPittsylvaniaPulaskiRockbridgeWythe*    *    *    *    *


[FR Doc. 2015-01937 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325-39-P