alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Boehringer Ingelheim Chemical, Inc. applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Boehringer Ingelheim Chemical, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of the controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated May 28, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 4, 2014, 79 FR 32321, Boehringer Ingelheim Chemical, Inc., 2820 N. Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 23805-9372, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Boehringer Ingelheim Chemical, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone Intermediate (9254)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers for formulation into finished pharmaceuticals. In reference to methadone intermediate (9254) the company plans to produce methadone HCL active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for sale to its customers. Dated: January 9, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01289 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will 
reflect the change in the number of judgeships authorized by subsection 
(a), such table is amended by striking the item relating to Idaho and 
inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
#### West Chicago Street Railroad Company v. Joseph Walz.

1. Ordinary *Care—Question of*Fact.—As to *whether the*plaintiff, at the time of the accident in question, was in the exercise of ordinary care, is a question of fact.

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. George F. Blanks, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 22, 1896.

Statement oe the Case.

This is an action by Joseph Walz to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the West Chicago Street Railroad Company.

The plaintiff claims that on the morning of October 9, 1891, he attempted to get on one of the defendant’s east bound 18th street cars at Paulina street, but through the carelessness and negligence of the defendant’s servants, the car was started suddenly while the plaintiff was, with due care and diligence, attempting to get on, thereby throwing him to the ground in such a way that the car passed over his left hand.

*444Iiis middle finger was cut off at the second joint, and the ends of the first'and third fingers were crushed.

At the trial the jury returned' a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for one thousand dollars, and judgment was entered thereon.

The defendant appeals.

Egbert Jamieson and John A. Rose, attorneys for appellant.

Goldier & Rodgers, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered 'the opinion of the Court.

The decision of this cause rests upon the proper determination of a question of fact, viz., whether the appellee was in the exercise of ordinary care at the time he was struck and injured by a car run "by appellant.

We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the conclusion of the jury in this regard, sanctioned, as it has been, by the action of the court below.

The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

February 14, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00007

- CV

AKF GROUP LLC

, Appellant

v.

Keath GARRISON and Kassie Garrison, Individually and as Next Friend of Karrah Garrison and Maycie Garrison, Minors; Haela Garrison; Ernest D. Copelin, Individually and as Represent ative of the Estate of Roper T. Nathon Copelin, Deceased' and Tangela M. Copelin, Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI00853 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee s ’ brief s are due on February 18, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b). Before the
due date, Appellee s filed opposed motion s for a thirty

- day extension of time to file Appellee s ’

brief s until March 19

, 2020

. Appellee s ’ motion s are GRANTED. Appellee s ’ brief s are due on March 19, 2020.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ Michael A . Cruz

, Clerk of Court
*October 8, 1940.*

#### Swendsen, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Larsen and another, Defendants and Respondents: Wyrwas and another, Defendants and Appellants.

For the appellants : *Classon & Ball-man*of Green Bay, and *James R. Durfee*of Antigo.

For the plaintiff-respondent: *A. H. Eberlein*of Wausau, arid *Lehner & Lehner*and *Adolph P. Lehner,*all of Oconto Fails.

For the defendants-respondents : *Bird, Smith, Okoneski & Puchner,*attorneys, and *Charles F. Smith*of counsel, all of Wausau.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Using the Test Data of REWET-II Reflooding Experiment SGI/R (NUREG/IA-0090)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0090 (PDF 1.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1993

**Prepared by:** A. Hämäläinen

Technical Research Centre of Finland Nuclear Engineering Laboratory P.O. Box 169 SF-00181 Helsinki, Finland

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An analyses of a reflooding experiment with RELAP5/MOD2 cycle 36.04 is presented. The experiment had been carried out in the REWET-II facility simulating the reactor core with a bundle of 19 electrically heated rods. On the basis of the results of two calculations recommendations for the core nodalization are presented, and a modification to the code is proposed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Form for Performance Share Amendment



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Dated Effective: September 22, 2010 
 [Name] 

1195 NW Compton Drive 
 Beaverton, OR 97006

  

	Re:	Amendment to Performance Shares 

 Dear
[Name]: 
 As you are already aware, on September 9, 2010 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Planar Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved the amendment of your outstanding performance shares listed below (the “Award(s)”) so that the shares set forth below (the “Amended Award(s)”) will no longer vest and become payable based on the
achievement of certain stock price-based performance goals for the original performance period as set forth on the applicable Performance Share Agreement and Notice of Grant, but will instead vest based on the achievement of new performance goals
during a new performance period, both of which will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion upon approval by the Company’s Board of Directors of a three- to five-year Strategic Plan during the first half of fiscal year 2011. You
will be notified of these performance goals and the new performance period in writing as soon as practicable after the Committee determines them. 
  

					
	 Grant Date
	  	Target Number
of
Performance
Shares	  	Original
Performance 
Period
	 October 10, 2008
	  	403,333	  	FY 2009 through FY 2010

 To acknowledge your agreement with this amendment, please sign and deliver to me the Acknowledgment contained in the extra copy of this letter provided for that purpose confirming your agreement to the
amendment and the terms of this letter. 
 Please do not hesitate to contact me at 503-748-1100 if you have any questions regarding this matter.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	  

	Gerald Perkel
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	 ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:



			
		
	By:	 	  



			
	Name:	 	  



			
	Date:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 4.3    
    

 






 



					
	Number

A-

	 	Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware	 	Shares

-0-

Cusip No.




 

  
 

  LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC.
  
    Series A Splitco Starz Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
  
    Specimen Certificate    
    


        This Certifies that
                                         
                                        is the owner
of
                                         
                                        FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A SPLITCO STARZ COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC. (hereinafter called the "Corporation") transferable on the
books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the
Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


        Witness,
the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

 










					
	Dated:	 	 	 	 
	

 	
 	
Liberty Splitco, Inc.

[Corporate Seal]	
 	

 
	






  President	 	 	 	






  Secretary




 

 








QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.3


LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC. Series A Splitco Starz Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Specimen Certificate
Exhibit 13.1

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shih-Jye Cheng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2008



/s/ Shih-Jye ChengName: Shih-Jye ChengTitle:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                      MATZEL & MUMFORD AT FREEHOLL, LLC
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                          391,731
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   735,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                  11,561,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             12,689,110
<PP&E>                                                           11,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               12,700,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        12,700,895
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 12,700,895
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

K.M., the father

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 19

- 3036

[ February 26, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert B. Meadows , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562018DP000089

.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children ’ s Le gal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children & Families.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem

.

P ER C UR IAM

.

The Department removed the child, O.M., from the mother based entirely on injuries sustained by O.M.’s half

- sibling, A.M. After the trial court denied termination of parental rights as to the half

- sibling, the trial court dismissed the dependency proceedings against O.M. and returned the child to the mother. On appeal, O.M. ’s father, K.M., claims that his due process rights were violated. We disagree and find that n o violation of due process occurred. K.M. was notified of all hearings and participated in the proceedings below. Further, O.M. was taken from the mother and

n ot K.M., who lived out

- of

- state. However, we agree that remand is necessary to correct a scrivener’s error in the amended final judgment,2 which incorrectly named M.M. , rather than K.M., as O.M.’s father. 1

Affirmed and remanded

.

L EVINE
, C.J., G ROSS an d D AMOOR G IAN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 Our affirmance in no way prejudices or prejudges K.M.’s rights as a father to

O.M.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (NUREG-1865)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1865 (PDF - 39.7 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2006**Date Published:**October 2006

**Prepared by:** Daniel J. Merzke

Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This safety evaluation report (SER) documents the technical review of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) license renewal application (LRA) by the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). By letter dated March 16, 2005, Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC or the applicant), submitted the LRA for MNGP in accordance with Title 10, Part 54, "Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants," of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 54). NMC is requesting renewal of the operating license for MNGP (Facility Operating License Number DPR-22) for a period of 20 years beyond the current expiration date of midnight September 8, 2010.

MNGP is located approximately 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The NRC issued the construction permit for MNGP on June 19, 1967. The NRC issued the operating license for MNGP on January 9, 1981. MNGP is a single-cycle, forced circulation, General Electric BWR-3, a boiling-water reactor producing steam for direct use in a steam turbine. General Electric Corporation supplied the nuclear steam supply system and Bechtel Corporation originally designed and constructed the balance of the plant. MNGP operates at a licensed power output of 1775 megawatt thermal (MWt), with a gross electrical output of approximately 600 megawatt electric (MWe).

The staff reviewed the MNGP LRA in accordance with Commission regulations and NUREG-1800, "Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants," dated July 2001. Section 6 of this SER provides the staff's conclusion of its review of the MNGP LRA.

The NRC license renewal project manager is Mr. Daniel Merzke. Mr. Merzke may be reached at (301) 415-3777. Written correspondence should be addressed to the Division of License Renewal, Mail Stop 0-11 F1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Schedule of parties to Indemnification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1.1 

 
 LIST OF INDEMNITEES 

Each of the individuals identified below is party to an indemnification agreement with GEOTAG INC. in the form attached as Exhibit 10.1
to GEOTAG’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-170565), originally filed with the Commission on November 12, 2010: 
 Antony Norris 
 John Veenstra 

Ira Kirschner 

Lawrence Howorth
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Han Logistics, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Amee Han Lombardi, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: 4/10/2007 /s/Amee Han Lombardi Amee Han Lombardi, President/Secretary/Treasurer
Order filed August 3 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00378

- CR

____________ EX PARTE TAMARA CHERYL BARLOTTA

- WOOD

On Appeal from the 458th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18

- DCR

- 083468 B



### ORDER
Appellant is appealing the den ial of her application for a writ of habeas

c orpus. On July 12 , 20 2 1 , the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which did not contain a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2 ), 34.5(a)(12); see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. An appeal must be dism issed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Dears , 15 4 S.W.3d at 613. Rule 25 .2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure instructs the trial court to enter a cer ti ficate of the defendant ’ s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of gui lt or other appealable order

. Tex. R. Ap p. P. 25. 2(a)(2) (em p hasis added). This includes the entry of an order on a defen d ant ’ s application for writ of ha beas c orpus. See Ex parte Vazquez , No. 3

-19

- 00885

- CR, 2019 WL 6972681 (Tex. App.

— Austin Dec. 20, 2019, no pet.) (order ).

We order the trial court to execu te a ce r tification of appellant’ s right to appeal and dire ct the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification with this court within 30 days of the date o f this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), 37.1, 44.4; Vazquez , 2019 WL 6972681 at

* 1.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain.