alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL JUAREZ-ROMERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73552

Agency No. A093-469-440

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 5, 2009

Seattle, Washington

Before: ALARCÓN, KLEINFELD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Juarez-Romero petitions for review of the dismissal by the Board of

Immigration Appeals of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s order of removal

based on his November 2006 conviction for identity theft in the first degree. See

WASH. REV. CODE. § 9.35.020 (1) and (2) (2006). We deny his petition for review.

FILED

DEC 02 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Juarez asserts that the BIA erred by concluding that his statute of conviction

was a crime involving moral turpitude. We conclude that Juarez’s statute of

conviction categorically describes a crime involving moral turpitude and therefore

deny his petition for review.

A crime involving fraud is a crime involving moral turpitude. NavarroLopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063, 1074 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). Washington’s

identity theft statute describes a form of fraud, specifically the knowing use of

another person’s identification to obtain something of value (in excess of $1,500 of

value) with the intent to commit (or to aid and abet) any crime. Although the

intent required by the statute is “the intent to commit a crime” rather than the intent

to defraud, petitioner has failed to identify any application of the statute that would

not constitute fraud. See Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183, 193 (2002). 

We have not found any. See e.g. State v. Leyda, 157 Wash. 2d 335, 138 P.3d 610

(Wash. 2006); State v. Acrey, 135 Wash. App 938, 146 P.3d 1215 (Wash. App.

Div. 1, 2006). Thus, the BIA did not err when it determined that Juarez’s statute of

conviction was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude and dismissed his

appeal.

PETITION DENIED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Spent Fuel Decay Heat Measurements Performed at the Swedish Central Interim Storage Facility (NUREG/CR-6971)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6971 (PDF - 9.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2009**Date Published:** February 2010

**Prepared by:** B.D. Murphy and I.C. Gauld

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6517

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Calorimeter measurements of full-length spent fuel assemblies have been performed at the Swedish Central Interim Storage Facility for Spent Fuel (CLAB) located in Oskarshamn, Sweden. These measurements provide an important and unique database for the validation of computer code predictions of decay heat for modern fuel types and assembly designs. The measured assemblies include boilingwater reactor 8 × 8, 9 × 9, SVEA-64, and SVEA-100 assemblies, and pressurized-water reactor 15 × 15 and 17 × 17 assemblies. This report compiles the assembly design and fuel data, reactor operating history data, reactor conditions, and the results of the decay heat measurements that have been performed for intact spent fuel assemblies. The data are presented in sufficient detail to allow independent code validation studies to be performed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Effect of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials (NUREG/CR-6909)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed   Consolidated  Balance  sheet  as  of  September  30,  1998  and  the
Consolidated  Statement of Income for the nine months ended  September  30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         30,810
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                      235
<INVENTORY>                                     3,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               48,178
<PP&E>                                          6,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                  5,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,327
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,220
<SALES>                                        34,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               34,114
<CGS>                                          12,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   55
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,589
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.48
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2020-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 24, 2023


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
Dlssm TRAVEL SERVICE (U.S.A.), INC. +­

We Service the World. 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

~- On benalfDrNisshi Travel Services(Los-Angeles-.t3ranchj;I anlwriting to~~express 

our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between 

Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely 

on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created 

demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience 

offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can 

support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong 

Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to 

Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request. 

Nissin Travel Service (U.S.A.)Inc. 


Los Angeles Branch 


?~==~~>=.:::::=:-:::..::::::::.. 

Hiroshi Tanno 


Branch Manager 


1540 WEST 190TH STREET. TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90501 • PH: (310) 782-1151. FAX: (310) 782-9316. 1-800-783-6477
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 834 V

UNPUBLISHED

LAUR IE MAROWSKI on behalf of her
minor child, A.M.,

Petitioner s

,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 2 , 2021

Withdrawal of petition ; Order concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On February 1, 2021

, Courtney and Christopher Counts filed a petition for compensation on behalf of their minor child, M.C., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d that

A.M. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on February 1,

2018

. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g )

. O n October 29 , 2021

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw

the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk ’s Office.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE LCA-VISION INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001003130
<NAME> LCA-VISION INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                       293
<INVENTORY>                                         81
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10645
<PP&E>                                           20459
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5409
<BONDS>                                           3470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      11930
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                       11521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32429
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16228
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of Claxson Interactive Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose Antonio Ituarte, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 14, 2003

                                                       /s/ Jose Antonio Ituarte
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Jose Antonio Ituarte
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Jul 12 2010 

Mr. Randy Hansen 

Government Relations Director 

Experimental Aircraft Association 

P.O. Box 3086 

Oshkosh, WI 54903 

Dear Mr. Hansen: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for reconsideration for 

an exemption from §§ 91.315, 91.319(a)(2), 119.5(g), 119.21(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request, gives you some 

important information about how we have handled similar requests, and tells you what you 

should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your September 29, 2009, exemption request for the Experimental Aircraft 

Association, Inc. (EAA), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR § 11.101. For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

• Significant additional fact(s) and why you did not present it in your original petition; 

• Important factual error(s) were made by the FAA in the denial of your original 

petition; or 

• Law(s), regulation(s), or precedent(s) were misinterpreted by the FAA in the decision 

to deny your original petition. 

How We Have Handled Similar Requests 

Your request for exemption concerns permitting the Consolidated PT-3, N31PT, experimental 

amateur-built aircraft to be used for the purpose of carrying passengers for compensation or 

hire on local flights for educational and historical purposes. 
2 

It is important for you to know that an exemption from aviation safety regulations is not 

routinely granted if the proposed operation can be performed in full compliance with the rules. 

More specifically, the FAA has determined that the issuance of a living history flight 

experience exemption applies only when an aircraft’s certification prohibits compliance with 

the applicable parts of the CFR and when the proposed operation cannot be conducted in a 

standard category aircraft. Unless your proposed operation could not be conducted in a 

standard category aircraft, there is little reason to believe that we would grant your petition for 

reconsideration. 

What You Should Do 

• You must tell us how the facts and circumstances of your particular situation are 

significantly different from the previous facts you provided; and 

• Send the information we requested earlier in this letter that will enable us to process your 

request. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without further 

consideration. 

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
sl 

## ieloWd; Douglas petition in Docket No. 66961 does not articulate a basis for relief, we are not persuaded by his argument in Docket No. 66848 that his constitutional rights were violated by being required to attend the status conference in person.' Accordingly, we deny the writ petition in Docket No. 66961. It is so ORDERED. , J. Hardesty , J.
,J.
cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Russell Demetras & O'Neill Washoe District Court Clerk

'Russell's writ petition in Docket No. 66961 also appears to take issue with the district court's decision to not strike a document filed by the defendant. A review of the November 7, 2014, order, however, reveals no discussion or ruling on such an issue. Accordingly, we decline to further consider that issue. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (requiring the petitioner to provide this court with the documentation necessary to understand the matters set forth in the writ petition).

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A 

## e
# L_2015258EN.01001001.xml

| 3.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 258/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 258/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1774

of 1 October 2015

appointing a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Emilio DEL RÍO SANZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Emilio DEL RÍO SANZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Dña Begoña MARTÍNEZ ARREGUI, Consejera de Presidencia, Relaciones Institucionales y Acción Exterior del Gobierno de la Rioja. |
| --- | --- |

—

Dña Begoña MARTÍNEZ ARREGUI, Consejera de Presidencia, Relaciones Institucionales y Acción Exterior del Gobierno de la Rioja.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 1 October 2015.

For the Council

The President

E. SCHNEIDER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70

3

---