Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 100
          - [Docket Number USCG-2014-0905]
          - RIN 1625-AA08

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation on the waters of the Manatee River in Bradenton, Florida, during the Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta. The event is scheduled to take place annually from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on the first Saturday of February. The special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the event. The special local regulation will restrict vessel traffic in the waters of the Manatee River in the vicinity of Bradenton, Florida. It will establish the following two areas: Enforcement areas #1 and #2, where all persons and vessels, except those persons and vessels participating in the high speed boat races and those vessels enforcing the areas, are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within.

# DATES:

This rule is effective February 1, 2015. This rule will be enforced annually on the first Saturday of February from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket USCG-2014-0905. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to                         *http://www.regulations.gov,*                         type the docket number in the “SEARCH” box and click “SEARCH.” Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this rule, call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Hector I. Fuentes, Sector Saint Petersburg Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228-2191, email                         *Hector.I.Fuentes@uscg.mil*. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security

                        FR                         **Federal Register**

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

## A. Regulatory History and Information

The Coast Guard is establishing this Special Local Regulation on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Manatee River, Florida during the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta. On November 26, 2014, the Coast Guard published a notice proposing this final rule. No comments were received.

                    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the                     **Federal Register**                     because immediate action is needed to minimize potential danger to the public during this event and the rule will have minimal impact on the public and waterway users. The comment period on this rule ended on December 26, 2014 and the Coast Guard did not have sufficient time to publish notice of this rule. This event has been well publicized by the City of Bradenton and local media outlets. Any delay in the effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest because this rule is needed to minimize potential danger to the public during the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta and fireworks display.                

## B. Basis and Purpose

The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

The purpose of the rule is to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters of the United States during the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta.

## C. Comments and Changes to the Final Rule

The Coast Guard received no comments related to this event during the comment period. This rule makes one change to the proposed regulation. In the NPRM, the special local regulation exclusion areas would be enforced from 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. However, the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta includes a fireworks display. To ensure the safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public on the navigable waters of the United States during the fireworks display, the Coast Guard is extending the enforcement period for the special local regulation until 7:30 p.m. Because the fireworks display will take place in the race area, the geographic area of the proposed enforcement zones remains unchanged in this rule. Additional notice and opportunity to comment on this change is unnecessary because extending the enforcement period a few hours is a logical outgrowth of the the NPRM. The fireworks display has always been part of the schedule of events, publicized by the City of Bradenton and local media. Furthermore, the additional impact of the extended enforcement period is minimal. The enforcement areas will be restricted for three extra hours once per year.

## D. Regulatory Analyses

We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

### 1. Regulatory Planning and Review

                    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory                           ( print page 4498)                        Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.                

### 2. Impact on Small Entities

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have considered the impact of this rule on small entities. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

                    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    ) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it.                

### 3. Assistance for Small Entities

                    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    , above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.                

### 4. Collection of Information

This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

### 5. Federalism

A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

### 6. Protest Activities

                    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.                

### 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

### 8. Taking of Private Property

This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.

### 9. Civil Justice Reform

This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

### 10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children.

### 11. Indian Tribal Governments

This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

### 12. Energy Effects

This rule is not a “significant energy action” under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

### 13. Technical Standards

This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

### 14. Environment

                    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under                     **ADDRESSES**                    .                

# List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

      - Marine safety
      - Navigation (water)
      - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
      - Waterways

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

# PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:33 U.S.C. 1233.

2. Add § 100.722 to read as follows: 

§ 100.722 

                            (a)                             *Regulated Areas.*                             The following regulated areas are established as special local regulations. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.                        

                            (1)                             *Enforcement Area #1.*                             All waters of the Manatee River between the Green Bridge and the CSX Train Trestle contained within the following points: 27°30.73′ N, 82°34.37′ W, thence to position 27°30.73′ N, 82°34.13′ W, thence to position 27°29.97′ N, 82°34.27′ W, thence to position 27°29.59′ N, 82°34.07′ W, thence back to the original position, 27°30.73′ N, 82°34.37′ W.                        

                            (2)                             *Enforcement Area #2.*                             All waters of the Manatee River contained within the following points: 27°30.58′ N, 82°34.62′ W, thence to position 27°30.58′ N, 82°34.43′ W, thence to position 27°30.43′ N, 82°34.43′ W, thence to                                   ( print page 4499)                                position 27°30.43′ N, 82°34.62′ W, thence back to the original position, 27°30.58′ N, 82°34.62′ W.                        

                            (b)                             *Definition.*                             The term “designated representative” means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated areas.                        

                            (c)                             *Regulations.*                             (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated areas unless an authorized race participant.                        

(2) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic throughout the regulated areas as determined by the prevailing conditions.

(3) Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated areas by contacting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7506, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.

                            (d)                             *Enforcement Date.*                             This section will be enforced annually from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on the first Saturday of February.                        

Dated: January 8, 2015.

G.D. Case,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.

[FR Doc. 2015-01620 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P