Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4301 

maintenance costs). The comments that 

are submitted will be summarized and 

included in the CBP request for OMB 

approval. All comments will become a 

matter of public record. In this 

document, CBP is soliciting comments 

concerning the following information 

collection: 

Title: Lien Notice. 

OMB Number: 1651–0012. 

Form Number: 3485. 

Abstract: Section 564, Tariff Act of 19, 

as amended (19 U.S.C. 1564) provides 

that the claimant of a lien for freight can 

notify CBP in writing of the existence of 

a lien, and CBP shall not permit 

delivery of the merchandise from a 

public store or a bonded warehouse 

until the lien is satisfied or discharged. 

The claimant shall file the notification 

of a lien on CBP Form 3485, Lien 

Notice. This form is usually prepared 

and submitted to CBP by carriers, 

cartmen and similar persons or firms. 

The data collected on this form is used 

by CBP to ensure that liens have been 

satisfied or discharged before delivery of 

the freight from public stores or bonded 

warehouses, and to ensure that proceeds 

from public auction sales are distributed 

to the lienholder. CBP Form 3485 is 

provided for by 19 CFR 141.112, and is 

accessible at http://forms.cbp.gov/pdf/

CBP_Form_3485.pdf. 

Current Actions: This submission is 

being made to extend the expiration 

date with no change to the burden 

hours. There are no changes to the 

information collected or to Form 3485. 

Type of Review: Extension (without 

change). 

Affected Public: Businesses. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

112,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 15 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 28,000. 

Dated: January 21, 2015. 

Tracey Denning, 

Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01476 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Notice of Revocation of Customs 

Broker’s License 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, Department of Homeland 

Security. 

ACTION: Customs broker’s license 

revocation. 

SUMMARY: This document provides 

notice of the revocation of a customs 

broker’s license. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document provides notice that, 

pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (codified at 19 U.S. 

Code 1641), and section 111.30(d) of 

title 19 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (19 CFR 111.30(d)), the 

following customs broker’s license is 

revoked by operation of law without 

prejudice for failure to file a triennial 

status report. 

Company name License No. Port of issuance 

Brian D. Stacy .............................................................................................................................................. 21354 Seattle 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Brenda Smith, 

Assistant Commissioner, Office of 

International Trade. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01439 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–HQ–MB–2015–N019; 

FXMB37660900000–14X–FF09M12000] 

Information Collection Request Sent to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for Approval; Migratory Birds 

and Wetlands Conservation Grant 

Programs 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: We (U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service) have sent an Information 

Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for 

review and approval. We summarize the 

ICR below and describe the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. This information collection is 

scheduled to expire on January 31, 

2015. We may not conduct or sponsor 

and a person is not required to respond 

to a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. However, under OMB 

regulations, we may continue to 

conduct or sponsor this information 

collection while it is pending at OMB. 

DATES: You must submit comments on 

or before February 26, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Send your comments and 

suggestions on this information 

collection to the Desk Officer for the 

Department of the Interior at OMB– 

OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or OIRA_

Submission@omb.eop.gov (email). 

Please provide a copy of your comments 

to the Information Collection Clearance 

Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 

MS BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls 

Church, VA 22041–3803 (mail), or 

hope_grey@fws.gov (email). Please 

include ‘‘1018–0100’’ in the subject line 

of your comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request additional information about 

this ICR, contact Hope Grey at hope_

grey@fws.gov (email) or 703–358–2482 

(telephone). You may review the ICR 

online at http://www.reginfo.gov. Follow 

the instructions to review Department of 

the Interior collections under review by 

OMB. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Information Collection Request 

OMB Control Number: 1018–0100. 

Title: Migratory Birds and Wetlands 

Conservation Grant Programs. 

Service Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Description of Respondents: Domestic 

and foreign individuals, businesses, and 

other for-profit organizations; 

educational organizations; not-for-profit 

institutions; and Federal, State, tribal 

and local governments 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain a benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Activity Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses 

Completion 

time per 

response 

(hours) 

Total annual 

burden hours 

NAWCA Small Grants—Applications ............................................................... 71 71 40 2,840 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4302 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 

Activity Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses 

Completion 

time per 

response 

(hours) 

Total annual 

burden hours 

NAWCA Small Grants—Reports ..................................................................... 99 99 33 3,267 

NAWCA U.S. Standard Grants—Applications ................................................. 69 69 203 14,007 

NAWCA Canadian and Mexican Standard Grants—Applications ................... 27 27 80 2,160 

NAWCA Standard Grants—Reports ................................................................ 177 177 30 5,310 

NMBCA Grant Applications ............................................................................. 84 84 60 5,040 

NMBCA Reports .............................................................................................. 71 71 40 2,840 

Totals ........................................................................................................ 598 598 ........................ 35,464 

Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden 

Cost: None. 

Abstract: The Division of Bird Habitat 

Conservation administers grant 

programs associated with the North 

American Wetlands Conservation Act 

(NAWCA), Public Law 101–233, and the 

Neotropical Migratory Bird 

Conservation Act (NMBCA), Public Law 

106–247. 

North American Wetlands 

Conservation Act Grants 

NAWCA provides matching grants to 

organizations and individuals who have 

developed partnerships to carry out 

wetlands conservation projects in the 

United States, Canada, and Mexico for 

the benefit of wetlands-associated 

migratory birds and other wildlife. 

There is a Standard and a Small Grants 

Program. Both are competitive grants 

programs and require that grant requests 

be matched by partner contributions at 

no less than a 1-to-1 ratio. Funds from 

U.S. Federal sources may contribute to 

a project, but are not eligible as a match. 

The Standard Grants Program 

supports projects in Canada, the United 

States, and Mexico that involve longterm protection, restoration, and 

enhancement of wetlands and 

associated uplands habitats. In Mexico, 

partners may also conduct projects 

involving technical training, 

environmental education and outreach, 

organizational infrastructure 

development, and sustainable-use 

studies. 

The Small Grants Program operates 

only in the United States. It supports the 

same types of projects and adheres to 

the same selection criteria and 

administrative guidelines as the U.S. 

Standard Grants Program. However, 

project activities are usually smaller in 

scope and involve fewer project dollars. 

Grant requests may not exceed $75,000, 

and funding priority is given to grantees 

or partners new to the NAWCA Grants 

Program. 

We publish notices of funding 

availability on Grants.gov (http://

www.grants.gov), as well as in the 

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

(https://www.cfda.gov). To compete for 

grant funds, partnerships submit 

applications that describe in substantial 

detail project locations, project 

resources, future benefits, and other 

characteristics that meet the standards 

established by the North American 

Wetlands Conservation Council and the 

requirements of NAWCA. Materials that 

describe the program and assist 

applicants in formulating project 

proposals are available on our Web site 

at http://www.fws.gov/birdhabitat/

Grants/NAWCA. Persons who do not 

have access to the Internet may obtain 

instructional materials by mail. We have 

not made any major changes in the 

scope and general nature of the 

instructions since OMB first approved 

the information collection in 1999. 

Neotropical Migratory Bird 

Conservation Act 

NMBCA establishes a matching grant 

program to fund projects that promote 

the long-term conservation of 

neotropical migratory birds and their 

habitats in the United States, Canada, 

Latin America, and the Caribbean. 

Principal conservation actions 

supported are: 

• Protection and management of 

populations. 

• Maintenance, management, 

protection, and restoration of habitat. 

• Research and monitoring. 

• Law enforcement. 

• Community outreach and 

education. 

We publish notices of funding 

availability on Grants.gov as well as in 

the Catalog of Federal Domestic 

Assistance. To compete for grant funds, 

partnerships submit applications that 

describe in substantial detail project 

locations, project resources, future 

benefits, and other characteristics that 

meet the standards established by the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the 

requirements of NMBCA. 

Materials that describe the program 

and assist applicants in formulating 

project proposals for consideration are 

available on our Web site at http://

www.fws.gov/birdhabitat/Grants/

NMBCA. Persons who do not have 

access to the Internet may obtain 

instructional materials by mail. We have 

not made any major changes in the 

scope and general nature of the 

instructions since OMB first approved 

the information collection in 2002. 

Comments Received and Our Responses 

Comments: On October 22, 2014, we 

published in the Federal Register (79 

FR 63159) a notice of our intent to 

request that OMB renew approval for 

this information collection. In that 

notice, we solicited comments for 60 

days, ending on December 22, 2014. We 

received one comment. The commenter 

objected to the grant programs, but did 

not address the information collection 

requirements. We have not made any 

changes to the information collection. 

Request for Public Comments 

We again invite comments concerning 

this information collection on: 

• Whether or not the collection of 

information is necessary, including 

whether or not the information will 

have practical utility; 

• The accuracy of our estimate of the 

burden for this collection of 

information; 

• Ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on 

respondents. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment, including your personal 

identifying information, may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask OMB in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that it will be done. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4303 

Dated: January 21, 2015. 

Tina A. Campbell, 

Chief, Division of Policy and Directives 

Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01341 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R7–R–2012–N207; 

FXRS1265070000S3–134–FF07R06000] 

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska; 

Revised Comprehensive Conservation 

Plan and Final Environmental Impact 

Statement 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 

availability of a revised comprehensive 

conservation plan (plan/CCP) and final 

environmental impact statement (EIS) 

for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 

(refuge, NWR) for a 30-day public 

review. In this revised plan and final 

EIS, we describe how we propose to 

manage the refuge for the next 15 years. 

DATES: The review period will end 

February 26, 2015. We are not soliciting 

comments on the plan during this 

review period. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit questions 

or requests for more information by any 

one of the following methods: 

• Email: ArcticRefugeCCP@fws.gov. 

Include ‘‘Arctic National Wildlife 

Refuge Revised CCP and Final EIS’’ in 

the subject line of the message. 

• Fax: Attention: Arctic CCP, 

Planning Team Leader, Arctic National 

Wildlife Refuge, (907) 456–0428. 

• U.S. Mail: Attention: Stephanie 

Brady, Arctic CCP, Arctic National 

Wildlife Refuge, 101 12th Ave., Rm. 

236, Fairbanks, AK 99701. 

• In-Person Drop Off: You may drop 

off questions during regular business 

hours at the above addresses. 

You will find the plan and EIS, as 

well as information about the planning 

process and a summary of the revised 

plan, on the planning Web site: http:// 

arctic.fws.gov/ccp.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Brady, (907) 306–7448. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction 

With this notice, we continue the 

comprehensive conservation planning 

process for Arctic National Wildlife 

Refuge, which we began by publishing 

a notice of intent in the Federal Register 

(75 FR 17763) on April 7, 2010. For 

more about the initial process and the 

history of this refuge, see that notice. 

Background 

The Alaska National Interest Lands 

Conservation Act (ANILCA) requires us 

to develop a CCP for each national 

wildlife refuge in Alaska. The purpose 

of developing a CCP is to provide refuge 

managers with a strategy for achieving 

refuge purposes and contributing 

toward the mission of the National 

Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), 

consistent with sound principles of fish 

and wildlife management, conservation, 

legal mandates, and Service policies. In 

addition to outlining broad management 

direction for conserving wildlife and 

their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities 

available to the public, including 

opportunities for hunting, fishing, 

wildlife observation and photography, 

and environmental education and 

interpretation. In general, we review 

and update CCPs in Alaska every 15 to 

20 years. 

ANILCA lists specific purposes for 

each refuge in Alaska. These purposes 

provide the foundation for developing 

and prioritizing the management goals 

and objectives for each Alaskan refuge. 

The planning process is a way for us 

and the public to evaluate management 

goals and objectives that will ensure the 

best possible approach to wildlife, 

plant, and habitat conservation while 

providing for wildlife-dependent 

recreation opportunities that are 

compatible with each refuge’s 

establishing purposes and the mission 

of the NWRS. 

Additional Information 

The revised plan may be found at 

http://arctic.fws.gov/ccp.htm. The 

document incorporates an EIS, prepared 

in accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (43 

U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Alternatives Considered 

The revised plan and final EIS 

includes detailed information about the 

refuge, planning process, issues, and 

management alternatives considered. 

The final EIS includes discussions of six 

alternatives for refuge management. All 

six alternatives address three significant 

issues: Wilderness recommendations, 

Wild and Scenic River 

recommendations, and Kongakut River 

visitor use management. The Service’s 

preferred alternative is described in the 

revised Plan and final EIS. 

Alternative A: Current Management 

(No Action) 

This alternative reflects the current 

management direction of Arctic NWR. It 

provides the baseline against which to 

compare other alternatives. Under 

Alternative A, the refuge would 

continue to be managed according to the 

direction included in the 1988 plan. 

Current goals and objectives would not 

be changed. 

• Wilderness—No new areas would 

be recommended for Wilderness 

designation. 

• Wild and Scenic Rivers—No new 

rivers would be recommended for 

inclusion in the Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System. 

• Kongakut River Visitor Use 

Management—Managers would 

continue to manage visitors using the 

following practices: Group size limits 

for guided groups (7 hikers, 10 floaters); 

and No group size limits for non-guided 

groups, although we recommend using 

commercial limits; Information on lowimpact camping and other best practices 

would continue to be available on the 

Refuge Web site. Commercial service 

providers would continue to have 

special use permits with occasional 

compliance checks by the Service. 

Monitoring of physical and social 

conditions and visitor impacts would 

continue to occur occasionally. Air 

operator permit holders would be 

required to land on non-vegetated 

surfaces and asked to follow all Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) 

advisories during flight operations. The 

Service would prepare a Public Use 

Management Plan (as required by the 

1988 plan). 

Alternative B 

• Wilderness—Recommend the 

Brooks Range Wilderness Study Area to 

Congress for Wilderness designation. 

• Wild and Scenic Rivers— 

Recommend the Hulahula, Kongakut, 

and Marsh Fork Canning Rivers to 

Congress for inclusion into the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

• Kongakut River Visitor Use 

Management—Under this alternative, 

and immediately upon plan approval, 

we would proceed with two concurrent 

step-down plans: A Visitor Use 

Management Plan (VUMP) and a 

Wilderness Stewardship Plan (WSP). In 

addition to the practices identified 

under Alternative A, we would 

implement interim measures. The refuge 

would expand monitoring of degraded 

sites, work with guides to reduce visitor 

volume, work with air operators to 

disperse flights over high-use areas, 

publish a schedule of when guides will 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES