alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Best Practices for Behavioral Observation Programs at Operating Power Reactors and Power Reactor Construction Sites (NUREG/CR-7183)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7183 (PDF - 807.11 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2014**Date Published:** June 2014

**Prepared by:** J. R. Crockett S. S. Wagner D. B. Greenhalgh

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831

J. R. Crockett, Principal Investigator

P. Harris, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code: N4116

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This NUREG report discusses a research and comparative study sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and conducted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The report identifies best practices associated with behavioral observation programs (BOPs) used by a cross section of Federal agencies and private entities, discusses the need for effective BOPs at power reactors, and power reactor construction sites, and presents insights and recommendations to improve BOP performance.

The observations and recommendations identified in this report will inform the NRC’s regulatory inspection, licensing, and oversight of activities at NRC-licensed facilities during the application, construction, and operational phases. The results will also help inform applicants and licensees of best practices for BOPs. As a result, applicants and licensees have an opportunity to implement enhanced policies, procedures, and training to improve their identification of personnel unfit for duty or behaving in a manner that warrants additional attention and to efficiently and effectively conduct behavioral observations without undue burden. The outcome of this report contributes to reasonable assurance that NRC licensee facility operation and construction activities will not be inimical to public health and safety or the common defense and security.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
---

EXHIBIT 13.1 -CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
CHAPTER 63 OFTITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Medicure Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for
the year ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1) the
Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 1, 2009 | /s/
      Albert D. Friesen               
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------
|                         | Albert D. Friesen, Chief Executive Officer
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)             
|                         |                                           
|                         |                                           
|Dated: September 1, 2009 | /s/ Dwayne Henley                         
|                         | Dwayne Henley, Chief Financial Officer    
|                         | (Principal Financial Officer)             



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 86-881.

#### Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al. *v.*Kraftco, Inc., dba Sealtest Foods Division.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Flynn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William J. FlynnWilliam J. FlynnPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 30, 2014
#### James Hughley, Respondent, v Eugenie Gillespie et al., Appellants.

[631 NYS2d 374]

In an action to recover interest paid to obtain a satisfaction of mortgage, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hart, J.), dated December 27, 1993, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination dated January 5, *5851993, finding that the defendants were precluded from recovering unearned interest, granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and directed entry of a judgment in his favor in the sum of $27,683.12 together with interest and attorneys’ fees, and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and, upon reargument, the plaintiffs motion is denied, the defendants’ cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Pursuant to the specific terms of his purchase money mortgage, the plaintiff had no right to prepay the mortgage. Consequently, the defendants’ request for interest calculated to the maturity date of the mortgage note in consideration for their acceptance of prepayment and execution of a satisfaction of mortgage was not unlawful *(see, Lyons v National Sav. Bank,*280 App Div 339; *Feldman v Kings Highway Sav. Bank,*278 App Div 589, *affd*303 NY 675).

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, Real Property Law § 254-a is inapplicable to this case. That statute prohibits a mortgagee from collecting a prepayment fee from a mortgagor who sells his or her home when the mortgagee necessitates prepayment by refusing to consent to a request that the purchasers assume the mortgage or take title subject to the mortgage. Here, the defendants did not refuse to consent to the assumption of the mortgage by the plaintiff’s prospective purchasers or to their taking title to the property subject to the mortgage. No such request was ever made and, in fact, the terms of the proposed sale required the plaintiff to satisfy the mortgage.

Consequently, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of GLOBAL  NATIONAL  COMMUNICATIONS  CORP.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date here of (the "report"),
I, Wang Hanquing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in this  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated this 13th day of January, 2005.
                                                          /s/ Wang Hanquing
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Wang Hanquing
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00139-CV

____________________

FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant

V.

KEVIN GOATS, LORI GOATS AND AFSHIN "SEAN" FARSHAD, 

Appellees

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-198,294

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On June 27, 2018, we abated this accelerated appeal and remanded the case 

to the trial court for further proceedings to effectuate the parties’ settlement 

agreement. On July 19, 2018, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, and Kevin Goats, 

Lori Goats and Afshin “Sean” Farshad, Appellees, filed a joint motion to reinstate 

and dismiss the appeal in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.
2

We grant the parties’ joint motion, reinstate the appeal, and dismiss the 

accelerated appeal in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on August 15, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 16, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
No. 90-6412.

#### Galindo *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Will of Valley: Smits, Respondent, vs. Valley, Appellant.

*October 14*

November *11, 1930.*

*436For the appellant there was a brief by *Smith & Smith*of De Pere, attorneys, and *Robert A. Kaftan*of Green Bay of counsel, and oral argument by *Herbert J. Smith.*

*Edward M. Goemans*of De Pere, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

The findings of fact are as favorable to the mental competency of the deceased as Could be made. In the trial court’s opinion he said of the deceased: “He was cared for all of his life by his parents or his sister; he did not have sufficient mentality to do any business; could not rent a house or collect rent; could not bargain for his services or collect wages except to take what was handed him; had no conception of the value of his property;” and recites that when told, he comprehended that he owned the house, recognized relatives; could do simple manual labor as directed; small errands; could speak and understand French and a few simple words in English, and continued: . . . “I agree . . . that testator did not have sufficient mental force, without prompting, to form a resolve, to make a will according to his wishes and carry the business through to completion; that if his property was large and complex and his obligations varied he could not make a valid will, and that this will emanated from Tom and Flora.”

*437From the findings of fact made by the court supplemented by the opinion of the county judge we reach the conclusion that the deceased did not have sufficient capacity to comprehend sufficiently the condition of his property; his relation to the persons who were or might have been the objects of his bounty; and that he did not have an appreciation of the scope and bearing of the provisions of his will.

From the evidence in the case we must hold that the deceased -“did not have sufficient active memory to collect in his mind without prompting,the particulars or elements of the business to be transacted and to hold them in his mind a sufficient length of time to perceive at least their obvious relations to each other and be able to form some rational judgment in relation to them.” *Delafield v. Parish,*25 N. Y. 9. The language just quoted has been repeatedly approved by this court as a measure of testamentary capacity. *Will of Blakely,*48 Wis. 294, 300, 4 N. W. 337; *Will of Lewis,*51 Wis. 101, 7 N. W. 829; *Will of Butler,*110 Wis. 70, 85 N. W. 678; *Will of Downing,*118 Wis. 581, 95 N. W. 876. While it is possible to find some reason for one of normal mental capacity making such a will as this, it seems to be conclusively established that neither the provisions of the will nor the substance of its provisions emanated from the mind of the testator, but, as said in *Will of Downing, supra,*“on the contrary, those provisions- must haye emanated from others, and, when stated to him or read to him, he, in his weakened and passive condition of mind, merely assented by nodding.”

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law. It is ordered that the taxable costs of both parties be paid out of the estate.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# SCDAP/RELAP5 Thermal-Hydraulic Evaluations of the Potential for Containment Bypass During Extended Station Blackout Severe Accident Sequences in a Westinghouse Four-Loop PWR (NUREG/CR-6995)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6995 (PDF - 12.1 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2010 **Date Published:** March 2010

**Prepared by:** C.D. Fletcher, R.M. Beaton, V. V. Palazov, and D.L. Caraher R.W. Shumway (Consultant)

Information Systems Laboratories, Inc. 10070 Barnes Canyon Road San Diego, CA 92121

C. Boyd, NRC Point of Contact

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6198

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been conducting studies to evaluate the risk associated with steam generator tube failure during low probability severe accidents in pressurized-water reactors (PWRs) employing U-tube-type steam generators as part of the agency's Steam Generator Action Plan (ML 011300073). The evaluations focus on station blackout events that include a series of unlikely events and conditions that result in a "high-dry-low" plant condition. The high-dry-low condition refers to high primary side pressure along with a dried-out steam generator that is at low pressure. Failures of hot leg piping, pressurizer surge-line piping, and the reactor vessel lead to discharge of fission products into the containment. Failure of steam generator tubes prior to the failure of one of these other components leads to discharge of some fission products into the steam generator secondary system from where they may be discharged to the environment through the pressure-relief valves. This latter sequence is potentially more risk-significant since it involves a containment bypass scenario. The relative timing of these structural failures therefore affects the event sequence and whether the containment is bypassed.

This report summarizes thermal-hydraulic evaluations performed using the SCDAP/RELAP5 systems analysis code and a model representing a Westinghouse four-loop PWR. An assessment is made of the SCDAP/RELAP5 capabilities for predicting the phenomena and behavior important for this application. The plant model has benefitted from (1) extensive iterative comparisons with evaluations of natural circulation flows and turbulent mixing using a computational fluid dynamics code and (2) from comparison with experimental data for pertinent fluid-mixing behavior. This report documents the recent history of SCDAP/RELAP5 model improvements for this application, numerous sensitivity evaluations, estimates of the uncertainties in the calculated results, analyses of extended station blackout accident event sequences in a Westinghouse four-loop PWR, and a categorization of those event sequences based on containment bypass outcome.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

NICHOLE E. HUMES, A/K/A 

NICHOLE ELIZABETH TULISZEWSKI

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 3048 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 53 DB 2024

(Supreme Court of Illinois, M.R. 032079)

Attorney Registration No. 203709

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2024, having failed to respond to a Notice and 

Order directing her to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline, 

Nichole E. Humes, a/k/a Nichole Elizabeth Tuliszewski, is suspended from the practice 

of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of six months. She shall comply 

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
### -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 

## ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/30 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
---

Exhibit 99.12

CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 16, 2012

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Russell Myers, CPG, do hereby consent to the
filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled August
2011 Summary Report on the Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated
August 25, 2011 in the Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and
the Annual Information Form of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the
Company) dated March 16, 2012.

I also consent to the use of my name in the Companys
Form 40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form
dated March 16, 2012, and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual
Report on Form 40-F in the Companys Form S-8 Registration Statement (SEC File
No. 333-158533).

| | By: | /s/ Russell Myers 
| | --- | ------------------
| |     | Russell Myers, CPG
| |     | President         
| |     | Corvus Gold Inc.  

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
 /s/ Steve TiradoSteve TiradoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)August 9, 2005
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 4, 2009



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Regulatory Analysis for the Resolution of Generic Safety Issue 106: Piping and the Use of Highly Combustible Gases in Vital Areas (NUREG-1364)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1364 (PDF - 3.03 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 1993**Date Published:**June 1993

C. C. Graves 

Division of Safety Issue Resolution Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Highly combustible gases such as hydrogen, propane, and acetylene are used at all nuclear power plants. Hydrogen is of particular importance because it is stored in large quantities and is distributed and used continuously in buildings containing safety-related equipment. Large hydrogen releases at the hydrogen storage facilities or in these buildings could lead to fires or explosions that might result in loss of safety-related equipment. This report gives the regulatory analysis for the resolution of Generic Safety Issue 106, "Piping and the Use of Highly Combustible Gases in Vital Areas." Scopirig analyses showed that the risk associated with the storage and distribution of hydrogen for cooling electric generators at boiling-water reactors (BWRs), the off-gas system at BWRs, the waste gas system at pressurized-water reactors (PWRs), and station battery rooms and portable bottles of combustible gas used for maintenance at PWRs and BWRs is small. On the basis of generic evaluations, the NRC staff has concluded that several possible methods to reduce risk could provide cost-effective safety benefits at some plants. However, in view of the observed large differences in plant-specific characteristics affecting the risk associated with the use of hydrogen, and the marginal generic safety benefit that can be achieved in a cost-effective manner, it is recommended that this generic issue be resolved simply by making these results available in a generic letter. This information may help licensees in their plant evaluations recommended by Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, "Individual Plant Examination of External Events for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities," June 28, 1991.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
---

Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of International Tower
Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended May 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James J. Komadina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)      The information contained in this Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

| | Date:   August 26, 2011 | /s/
      James J. Komadina             
| | ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------
| |                         |                                         
| |                         | Name:   James J. Komadina               
| |                         | Title:     Chief Executive
      Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. and will be
retained by International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---