FAQ
    
    AGREEMENT STATES
    
    Facility Locator
    
    What's New
    
    Site Help
    
    Index A-Z
    
    Contact Us
    
    Email Updates
      
      
      
      
       
      Report a Safety Concern
                  Search
        Nuclear Reactors
  
  Power Reactors
Research & Test ReactorsOperating Reactors
New ReactorsOperator Licensing
Research ActivitiesNuclear Reactor Quick LinksNuclear Materials
  
  Types of Nuclear Materials
Fuel Cycle Facilities
Medical, Industrial, & Academic UsesUranium Recovery
Materials TransportationMaterials Environmental Reviews
National Materials ProgramNuclear Materials Quick LinksRadioactive Waste
  
  Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
Low-Level Waste
Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
High-Level WasteUranium Mill Tailings
Low-Level Waste Disposal
High-Level Waste DisposalStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Research ActivitiesRadioactive Waste Quick LinksNuclear Security
  
  Domestic Safeguards
Information Security
Radioactive Material SecurityRequired Reporting for Clearance Holders
Insider Threat Program for Licensees
CybersecurityCriminal History & Firearms Checks
Contact UsPublic Meetings & Involvement
  
  The NRC Approach to Open Government
About Meetings Open to the Public
Conferences & SymposiaDocuments for Comment
NRC Rules and Petitions
Facilitating Stakeholder InvolvementNRC Information Quality Guidelines
Subscribe to E-mail UpdatesCommission Schedule
Public Meeting ScheduleAdjudications (Hearings)
Adjudicatory SubmissionsNRC Library
  
  Basic References
Document Collections
ADAMS Public Documents
Public Document Room
LSN LibraryFOIA & Privacy Act
Photos & Videos
Records Management
Training CoursesFAQ Index
Get Copies of Documents
Withholding of Sensitive Information
Controlled Unclassified Information Program (CUI)Electronic Hearing DocketAbout NRC
  
  The Commission
Organization & Functions
Governing Legislation
Plans, Budget, & Performance
Locations
History
Values
Direction-Setting & Policymaking
Research Activities
Radiation ProtectionFire Protection
Safety Culture
How We Regulate
Emergency Preparedness & Response
Public Affairs
Congressional Affairs
Enforcement
International Programs
State & Tribal ProgramsAlternative Dispute Resolution Programs
Privacy Program
Civil Rights Program
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Contracting Opportunities
Small Businesses
Grant Opportunities
Generic SchedulesOther Links
  
  FAQ
Glossary
Facility Locator
What's NewSite Help
Index A-Z
Contact Us
Email UpdatesNRC Facebook
NRC Twitter Feed
NRC Linkedin
NRC Youtube Channel
NRC Flickr Gallery
NRC Blog Archived
NRC Email Subscriptions - GovDelivery Home
          NRC Library  Document Collections  NUREG-Series Publications  Publications Prepared by NRC ContractorsEvaluating Flaw Detectability Under Limited-Coverage Conditions (NUREG/CR-7304, PNNL-34367)

On this page:

Publication Information
	AbstractDownload complete document

NUREG/CR-7304 (PDF – 14.11 MB)Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2023**Published:** October 2023

**Prepared by:**
J. Harrison
R. Jacob
M. Prowant
A. Holmes
C. Hutchinson
A. Diaz

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
902 Battelle Blvd, Richland, WA 99354

Carol Nove, NRC Contracting Officer Representative (COR)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

Abstract

Assessing the structural integrity of welded piping components in the U.S. nuclear power fleet ensures safety to the public and environment. When conditions such as outside surface contours, physical obstructions from nearby structures or equipment, or different component metallurgical composition limit the ability to fully examine greater than 90% of a weldment's required examination volume, licensees must request regulatory relief from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Determining the impact on flaw detectability caused by an examination limitation can be complicated for both the licensee in evaluating the extent of examination coverage and for the NRC in determining the potential impact of the area unable to be examined.

To address the limited-coverage condition, the NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) directed the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to assess the ability of nondestructive examination (NDE) techniques to detect flaws when part of a weld is uninspectable due to limited-coverage conditions. The assessment included a review of submitted relief requests to better understand how incomplete weld coverage affects flaw detectability as well as the examination of select piping specimens with actual and simulated limiting conditions. The specimens contained flaws with varying lengths and through-wall depths and contained geometric conditions and flaw orientations known to complicate detectability. In addition, to support an understanding of limited coverage, selected empirical data were modeled and compared to simulation results.

The empirical and theoretical assessments in this report were conducted to aid development of a technical foundation that can be used to assist NRC Staff in the process of reviewing licensee requests for relief related to limited coverage.

This study identified that shallow flaws were the most susceptible to missed detection. The exact definition of "shallow" is difficult to specifically define, although in most cases these flaws were less than 30% through-wall depth. Additionally, a flaw may extend from an uninspectable region into an inspectable region and therefore be only partially insonified during a limitedcoverage exam. Definitively determining how far a flaw must extend into an inspectable region to be detected is not possible due to several variables, including the extent of the limiting condition, the propagating characteristics of the flaw (such as the length and orientation), and human factors (such as the complexity of the exam, examiner knowledge and experience, and time pressure).

This research identifies key considerations for limited-coverage UT examinations that may be implemented to increase the probability of detection. Phased-array techniques that use multiple beam angles and an imaging display of the results provide a significant analysis advantage over conventional techniques and equipment. When forward probe movement is restricted, removal of the weld crown is the most important action that can be taken as well as fully investigating any UT response that may appear outside the Code-required examination volume to discriminate between embedded responses and surface-connected flaws.

      
      Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 18, 2023  Home
NEWS RELEASES

EVENT REPORTS

ADAMS

OPEN GOV

DIGITAL GOVERNMENT

THE STUDENT CORNER

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

FOR DEVELOPERS
        About Us
STRATEGIC PLAN

BUDGET & PERFORMANCE

AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT

LICENSE FEES

HISTORY OF THE NRC

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

NRC ETHICS

AGENCY STATUS

CONTACT US
        Popular Documents
INFO DIGEST

FACT SHEETS & BROCHURES

FORMS

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS APPLICATION

ADJUDICATORY SUBMISSIONS

NRC REPORTS - NUREG

NRC REGULATIONS - 10-CFR

INSPECTION REPORTS

PLAIN WRITING

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

RULEMAKING

GLOSSARY
        Stay Connected
    
    
    
    
    United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    
    
    
    
    Regulations.gov

USA.gov

FOIA

Whistleblower Protection

No Fear EEO

Inspector General

Site Map

Accessibility

Privacy Policy

Site Disclaimer

For Employees