alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801 

To delay the effective date of the final rule of the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection titled ‘‘Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic Fund 

Transfer Act (Regulation E) and the Truth In Lending Act (Regulation 

Z)’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To delay the effective date of the final rule of the Bureau 

of Consumer Financial Protection titled ‘‘Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (Regulation E) and the Truth In Lending Act (Regulation Z)’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prepaid Account Com5 pliance and Extension Relief Act of 2017’’ or the 

6 ‘‘PACER Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1801 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF PREPAID CARD RULE. 

2 Notwithstanding any effective date set forth in the 

3 final rule of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

4 titled ‘‘Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic Fund 

5 Transfer Act (Regulation E) and the Truth In Lending 

6 Act (Regulation Z)’’ (published November 22, 2016; 81 

7 Fed. Reg. 83934), such final rule shall not take effect— 

8 (1) until October 1, 2018, with respect to the 

9 general effective date and any other effective date of 

10 October 1, 2017; and 

11 (2) until October 1, 2019, with respect to the 

12 effective date for issuers to submit prepaid account 

13 agreements to the Bureau and any other effective 

14 date of October 1, 2018. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Method for Performing Diversity and Defense-in-Depth Analyses of Reactor Protection Systems (NUREG/CR–6303, UCRL–ID–119239)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6303 (PDF - 2.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 1994**Date Published:** December 1994

**Prepared by:** G. G. Preckshot

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory University of California Livermore, CA 94551

**Prepared for:** Division of Reactor Controls and Human Factors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 NRC Job Code L1867

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The purpose of this NUREG is to describe a method for analyzing computer-based nuclear reactor protection systems that discovers design vulnerabilities to common-mode failure. The potential for common-mode failure has become an important issue as the software content of protection systems has increased. This potential was not present in earlier analog protection systems because it could usually be assumed that common-mode failure, if it did occur, was due to slow processes such as corrosion or premature wear-out. This assumption is no longer true for systems containing software. It is the purpose of the analysis method described here to determine points of a design for which credible common-mode failures are uncompensated either by diversity or defense-in-depth.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
2/26/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 

### TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 'CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

# [[ITDCJ Home 

# Offender Information Details I Retum to Search liill 

### SID Number: 07142820 

### TDCJ Number: 01652026 

### Name: DIAZ,ELOY GONZALES 

### Race: 

### B Gender: M 

### DOB: 1962-12-01 

### Maximum Sentence Date: 2017-05-30
. 

### Current Facility: RAMSEY I 

### Projected Release Date: 2017-05-30 

### Parole Eligibility Date: 2014-01-28 

### Offender Visitation Eligible: NO The offenderis temporarilyineligible for visitation. Please call the offender's unit for any additional information. The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times perday on visitation days.


### SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location:



# · Parole ReviewInformation Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearchloffenderDetail.action?sid=07142820 

### •

1/22/26/2015 TDCJ Offender Details Off ense 

### H" t 1s ory: Offense Offense Sentence County Case No. Sentence (YYDate Date MM-DD) 2003-02-15 INDECENCY W/CHILD CONTACT 2009-09-18 COLLIN 219-80280-04 7-00-00 2003-02-15 INDECENCY W/CHILD 2009-09-18 COLLIN 219-80280-04 7-00-00 EXPOSURE 2013-09-09 FAIL COMPLY SEX OFFEND 2014-03-07 HARRIS 140697001010 240 Days REGISTER [ Return to Search list 

# I

The Texas Department ofCriminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site maynot reflect the true current)location, status, scheduled termination date, orother information regarding an offender. For questions and comments, you maycontact the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice, at 

### (936) 295-6371 or webadmin@tdcj.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcement in the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminalprosecution. New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=07142820 2/2
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Soil and Groundwater Sample Characterization and Agricultural Practices for Assessing Food Chain Pathways in Biosphere Models (NUREG/CR-6881, PNNL-15244)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6881 (PDF - 3.49 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2005**Date Published:**August 2005

**Prepared by:** B.A. Napier, K.M. Krupka, M.M. Valenta, T.J. Gilmore Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352

P.R. Reed, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6469

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes work performed and summarizes observations to date on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s project *Assessment of Food Chain Pathway Parameters in Biosphere Models*, which was established to assess and evaluate a number of key parameters used in the food-chain models used in performance assessments of radioactive waste disposal facilities. Section 2 of this report describes activities undertaken to collect samples of soils and groundwater from three geographical regions of the United States, the Southeast, Northwest, and Southwest, and perform analyses to characterize their physical and chemical properties. Because the uptake and behavior of radionuclides in plant roots, plant leaves, and animal products depends on the chemistry of the water and soil coming in contact with plants and animals, water and soil samples collected from these regions on the United States are being used in ongoing experiments at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to determine radionuclide soil-to-plant concentration ratios, leaf interception and translocation factors. Crops and forage used in the experiments are grown in the soils, and long-lived radionuclides introduced into the groundwater provide the contaminated water used to water the grown plants. The radionuclide uptake results from this research study are expected to show how regional variations in water quality and soil chemistry affect radionuclide uptake. Section 3 summarizes information gathered regarding agricultural practices and common and unusual crops grown in each of these three areas. This type of information is directly useful in formulating inputs to radioecological and food-chain models used in performance assessments and other kinds of environmental assessment. This food-chain pathway data may be used by the NRC staff to assess dose to persons in the reference biosphere (e.g., persons who live and work in an area potentially affected by radionuclide releases) of waste disposal facilities and decommissioning sites.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| Dated: November 8, 2005  | /s/  DEBORAH DUNSIRE        |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |                                       |   |
|                          | Deborah Dunsire                       |   |
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          | (Principal executive officer)         |   |
|                          |                                  |   |

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Winternitz, Appellant, vs. Schmidt, Respondent.

*October 7*

October *26, 1915.*

*Judgment on cognovit: Reopening case: Discretion: Appeal from civil court: Costs.*

1. It was an abuse of discretion to refuse to reopen a case in which judgment had been entered on cognovit and permit defense to be made, where the moving papers included an answer setting forth a complete defense and showed that the judgment was suffered through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.”

2. The hearing of an appeal to the circuit court from the civil court of Milwaukee county is brought on by motion, and motion costs not exceeding $10 may be allowed thereon.

3. Under sec. 3069, Stats. 1913, as amended by sec. 9, ch. 219, Laws 1915, an order of the circuit court simply reversing an order of the civil court is not appealable.

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: Oscae M. Ebitz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Judgment on cognovit having been entered in the civil court of Milwaukee county in this action, that court denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and allow a defense to be interposed. On appeal to the circuit court this order was reversed with $10 costs, and the civil court was ordered to allow the proposed defense to be made on certain terms. From this latter order the plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Michael Levin.*

*F. H. Qugel,*for the respondent.

Winslow, C. J.

The order of the circuit court must be affirmed. The moving papers in the civil court included an answer setting forth a complete" defense and affidavits showing that the judgment had been suffered through “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Under these circumstances it is an abuse of discretion to refuse to reopen *422the case and allow the defense to be made. Sec. 2882, Stats.; *Bloor v.*Smith, 112 Wis. 340, 87 N. W. 870.

The court was entirely justified in imposing motion costs. Such costs, not exceeding $10, may be allowed on any motion. Sec. 2924, Stats. The hearing of an appeal from the civil court to the circuit court is brought on by motion. Sub. 4, sec. 28, ch. 549, Laws 1909.

Under the present statute regulating appeals to this court the order of the circuit court before us would not be appeal-able because it simply reverses an order of the civil court. Sec. 3069, Stats., as amended by sec. 9, ch. 219, Laws 1915.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,228
<SECURITIES>                                       501
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     37,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,780
<PP&E>                                         230,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 479,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,220
<BONDS>                                        254,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   479,638
<SALES>                                        183,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,213
<CGS>                                          137,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01330]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:31 a.m. on 
Wednesday, January 21, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Jeremiah O. Norton 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Comptroller of 
the Currency), Director Richard Cordray (Director, Consumer Financial 
Protection Bureau), and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the 
subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; 
that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public 
interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open 
to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the 
Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), c)(9)(A)(ii), 
(c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

     Dated: January 21, 2015.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01330 Filed 1-21-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Preparing NUREG-Series Publications, Revision 2 (NUREG-0650)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0650, Revision 2 (PDF - 4.72 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published**: January 1999

Office of the Chief information Officer Information Management Division U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The guidance in this publication is for the staff and contractors who prepare manuscripts to be published in the NUREG series for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This Revision 2 to NUREG-0650, "Publishing Documents in the NUREG Series," is retitled "Preparing NUREG-Series Publications." It gives more concise and up-to-date guidance, including certain Internet and World Wide Web addresses. It describes how to cite references to electronic information and, in addition, refers the NRC staff tobonline style guidance for Web site publishing.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2003, and for the period then ended.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Bryan Peery         
|Bryan Peery             
|Chief Accounting Officer



March
12, 2004



60
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Proposes $2,750 Fine Against Pennsylvania Firm for Gauge-Use Violations

----

----

I-99-61 July 14, 1999

 

**NRC PROPOSES $2,750 FINE AGAINST PENNSYLVANIA FIRM FOR GAUGE-USE VIOLATIONS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $2,750 fine against a Pennsylvania construction company for several violations of agency requirements involving the improper use and handling of a nuclear gauge.

At issue was whether a construction manager for Allan A. Myers Inc. of Worcester (Montgomery County), Pa., deliberately allowed an employee to use a portable gauge containing radioactive material (6.6 millicuries of cesium-137) at a construction site before the worker met several requirements.

Specifically, the employee should have completed a required training program; been designated as an authorized gauge user by the company's Radiation Safety Officer (RSO); been in the presence of the RSO; and worn dosimetry (radiation monitors) while using the device. (Nuclear gauges are used for various industrial and construction purposes, such as measuring moisture levels in soil.)

NRC has cited the company for three violations, based on an inspection last October at a road construction site in King of Prussia, Pa., as well as on a subsequent investigation by the agency's Office of Investigations (OI). The violations are 1) use of a portable gauge by an unauthorized individual without being in the presence of an authorized user and without necessary training; 2) use of the device without appropriate dosimetry; and 3) leaving the gauge unattended at the job site. The proposed $2,750 fine encompasses all of the violations.

In a June 17 letter, the company stated that the manager did not deliberately violate NRC requirements but instead experienced a lapse in judgment.

"Notwithstanding your contention," wrote Hubert J. Miller, NRC regional administrator, in a letter to the company, "the NRC maintains that the violations were deliberate in that the construction manager was aware of regulatory requirements, as he admitted in an interview with OI, but did not take action to assure that the regulatory requirements were met. Also, he had served as RSO at your facility for seven years."

The company has 30 days to contest all or part of the enforcement action.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements (NUREG-0737)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, July 22, 2021
#### State ex rel. Ennis and others, Appellants, vs. Longbotham, Respondent.

*November 20*

December *8, 1925.*

*State ex rel. Morgan v. Dornbrook,*ante, p. 426, followed.

Appeal from an order of the ciixuit court for Rock county: George Grimm, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Petition for a writ of *mandamus*to compel the defendant, as cpunty superintendent of schools of Rock county, to make *432an order detaching designated territory from the union free high school district of Orfordville, and parts of the towns of Spring Valley, Plymouth, and Avon joint school district of Rock county, pursuant to the provisions of ch. 251, Laws of 1925. If the designated territory were detached it would leave a district of much less than thirty-six sections in area. The court denied the petition, and the plaintiffs appealed.

For the appellants, the cause was submitted on the brief of *McGowan, Geffs & Fox*of Janesville.

*Nolan, Dougherty, Grubb & Ryan*of Janesville, for the respondent.

Vinje, C. J.

This case is governed by the case of *State ex rel. Morgan v. Dornbrook, ante,*p. 426, 206 N. W. 57.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.