alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 86-864.

#### Akers et ux. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Modelling of ROCOM Mixing Test 2.2 with TRACE v5.0 Patch 3 (NUREG/IA-0454)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0454 (PDF - 1.45 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2015**Date Published:** August 2015

**Prepared by:** VTT – Technical Research Centre of Finland Nuclear Power Plant Modelling P.O.B. 1000 02044 VTT Finland

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Experimental data on non-uniform flows in reactor pressure vessel downcomer has been recently produced at the ROCOM test facility at Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, within the framework of the OECD/PKL2 project. This data can be used for validation of three-dimensional thermal-hydraulic codes.

The transient ROCOM test 2.2 is calculated with the system-code TRACE v 5.0 Patch 3, using the new vessel junction component in order to produce local calculation grid refinement within the lower plenum.

The simulation results obtained with TRACE are qualitatively in good agreement with the experimental measurements, but quantitatively there is more diffusion in the calculated temperature distributions and some bias from the outlet boundary condition utilized in the simulation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence

      ( print page 4592)    

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

April 17, 2015.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Fordham University, School of Law, 150 West 62nd Street, New York, New York 10023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonathan C. Rose, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: January 23, 2015.

Jonathan C. Rose,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01565 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7184
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, a/k/a Slider, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-7266
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, a/k/a Slider, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-87- 371-HM, CA-96-261-L, CA-96-941-L)2 Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. No. 97-7184 dismissed and No. 97-7266 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Vincent Geise, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Lloyd George Maxwell appeals from the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West1994 & Supp. 1997) motion, his motion for a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and his motion to reconsider both of those orders. We dismiss No. 97-7184 as untimely and affirm the district court's orders in No. 97-7266. The district court denied Maxwell's § 2255 motion on November 8, 1996 and denied a timely motion for reconsideration on December 12, 1996. On July 29, 228 days after denial of the motion for reconsideration, Maxwell noted an appeal, No. 97-7184. When an appellant claims no notice of an entry of judgment, he has 180 days from the entry of judgment to move for an extension of the appeal period. See Fed. R. App. 4(a)(6). Maxwell filed a notice of appeal, unaccompanied by a motion for an extension, more than 180 days after entry of judgment. The district court therefore lacked the authority to extend the appeal period, and we thus lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. For that reason, we dismiss No. 97-7184 as untimely. As for Maxwell's appeal from the district court's denial of his motion for a certificate of appealability, No. 97-7266, we note that Maxwell's § 2255 motion was filed in the district court priorto the April 1996 effective date of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which requires such certificates in § 2255 appeals. Since no certificate of appealability is necessary in this appeal, we affirm the district court's denial.4 Finally, Maxwell has moved for appointment of counsel to assist in a petition for rehearing unrelated to either of these appeals. For that reason, we deny it. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 97-7184 - DISMISSED No. 97-7266 - AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2023

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, January 08, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, January 08, 2024
#### Drach, Appellant, vs. Hornig and wife, Respondents.

*April 27*

June *2, 1936.*

*576The cause was submitted on the record and printed case, and the brief of *Orth &■ Orth*of Milwaukee., attorneys for the appellant, and the letter of *Martin Schottler*of Milwaukee, attorney for the respondents.

Martin, J.

The sole question presented here has been passed upon by this court several times. *Big Bay Realty Co. v. Rosenberg,*218 Wis. 318, 259 N. W. 735; *Weimer v. Uthus, 217*Wis. 56, 258 N. W. 358; *Kremer v. Rule,*216 Wis. 331, 257 N. W. 166; *Swing State Bank v. Giese,*210 Wis. 489, 246 N. W. 556; *Buel v. Austin,*219 Wis. 397, 263 N. W. 82. Under the foregoing decisions, the trial court might have refused to confirm the sale in question and ordered a resale, but having confirmed the sale, it could only render judgment for the deficiency appearing in the report of sale.

*577Ch. 449, Laws of 1935 (now sec. 278.105), has no1 application here, since it did not become a law until its publication on September 13, 1935. In any event, if the sale be confirmed, the legal consequences prescribed by the statute must follow. It follows that that portion of the order appealed from must be reversed and a deficiency judgment directed in' favor of the plaintiff and against the respondents, C. Arthur Hornig and Emma Hornig, for the sum of $1,914.82.

*By the Court.*— That part of the order appealed from is reversed, and the record remanded, with directions that a deficiency judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, C. Arthur Hornig and Emma Hornig,. in the sum of $1,914.82, with costs.
No. 86-6066.

#### Wrenn *v.*Christian Hospital NE-NW et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 16, 1987, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in *Brown*v. *Herald Co.,*464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari *1082without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed *in forma pauperis.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE FRENO PRICE, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-6539
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIE FRENO PRICE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00048-jlk) Submitted: June 6, 2008 Decided: June 26, 2008 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Freno Price, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Willie Freno Price appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

Calendar No. 526 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1547 

[Report No. 115–307] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 3, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

JULY 23, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal 

land owned by the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes 

of economic development by conveyance of the Federal 

reversionary interest to the City. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Udall Park Land Ex5 change Completion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1547 RS

1 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

2 Tucson, Arizona. 

3 (2) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘non-Fed4 eral land’’ means the approximately 172.8-acre par5 cel of City land identified in the patent numbered 

6 02–90–0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and more 

particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S1⁄2NW1 7 ⁄4, 

8 sec. 5, T.14S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Merid9 ian, Arizona. 

10 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of the Interior. 

12 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTER13 EST IN LAND LOCATED IN TUCSON, ARIZONA. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, the Secretary shall convey to the City, without 

16 consideration, the reversionary interests of the United 

17 States in and to the non-Federal land for the purpose of 

18 unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land to enable 

19 economic development of the non-Federal land. 

20 (b) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—As soon as practicable 

21 after the date of enactment of this Act, the exact legal 

22 descriptions of the non-Federal land shall be determined 

23 in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary. 

24 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

25 Secretary may require such additional terms and condiVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:05 Jul 23, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1547.RS H1547

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1547 RS

1 tions to the conveyance under subsection (a), consistent 

2 with that subsection, as the Secretary considers appro3 priate to protect the interests of the United States. 

4 (d) COSTS.—The City shall pay all costs associated 

5 with the conveyance under subsection (a), consistent with 

6 that subsection, including the costs of any surveys, record7 ing costs, and other reasonable costs. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 526 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1547 

[Report No. 115–307] 

AN ACT 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to nonto the City. conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest zona, for purposes of economic development by Federal land owned by the city of Tucson, AriJULY 23, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1810 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1810

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2017

Mr. Curbelo of Florida (for himself and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow deductions and 
  credits relating to expenditures in connection with marijuana sales 
                conducted in compliance with State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Tax Equity Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS RELATING TO EXPENDITURES IN 
              CONNECTION WITH MARIJUANA SALES CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE 
              WITH STATE LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
unless such trade or business consists of marijuana sales conducted in 
compliance with State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Effects of Environmental Conditions on Manual Actions for Flood Protection and Mitigation (NUREG/CR-7256)

| File     | Title                                                                |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Volume 1 | Identifying Conditions, Characterizing Actions and Assessing Impacts |
| Volume 2 | Review of the Research Literature                                    |

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Fire Modeling of the Heiss Dampf Reaktor  Containment (NUREG/CR-6017,  SAND93-0528)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6017 (PDF - 5.27 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 1995**Date Published:**September 1995

**Prepared by:** V.F. Nicolette Sandia National Laboratories  Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0835 Operated by Sandia Corporation

K.T. Yang (Subcontractor) University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556

W. Gleaves, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code L1330

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes Sandia National Laboratories' participation in the fire modeling activities for the German Heiss Dampf Reaktor (HDR) containment building, under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The purpose of this report is twofold: 1) to summarize Sandia's participation in the HDR fire modeling efforts, and 2) to summarize the results of the international fire modeling community involved in modeling the HDR fire tests.

Calculations were conducted for an HDR oil fire test using the COMPBRN zone model, and the University of Notre Dame fire field model. COMPBRN had difficulty simulating the fire environment beyond the first 4 minutes following ignition due to instabilities resulting from high wall, ceiling, and hot gas layer temperatures. The Notre Dame fire model results indicate reasonable (and, in some cases, excellent) agreement with the experimental data. Discrepancies between calculation and experiment are explainable in terms of leakage around the doorway of the fire room.

Calculations were also conducted for an HDR cable fire test using the COMPBRN model. Results were obtained for the first 9 minutes of the fire (up to the point at which the door to the fire room was opened in the test). The strengths of COMPBRN are seen to be its ability to model the transient ignition and burning of cable tray fires in preflashover compartments. 

Additional comments on the state of fire modeling and trends in the international fire modeling community are also included. It is noted that although the trend internationally in fire modeling is toward the development of the more complex fire field models, each type of fire model has something to contribute to the understanding of fires in nuclear power plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 10.1
    

    
      8.        Voting;
      Dividends; Adjustments.  The Employee shall be
      entitled (provided that the obligation set forth in Section 6 hereof has
      been satisfied) to exercise all voting rights with respect to the
      Restricted Shares and, upon vesting, to receive all dividends accrued
      with respect thereto.  All previously declared dividends shall be
      accrued with respect to such Restricted Shares and shall be paid upon
      vesting of such shares in accordance with the preceding sentence,
      together with interest thereon at the rate of 5% per year, calculated
      from the payment date of such dividend to the vesting date.  
    

    
      In the event that the outstanding securities of any class then
      comprising the Restricted Shares are increased, decreased or exchanged
      for or converted into cash, property and/or a different number or kind
      of securities, or cash, property and/or securities are distributed in
      respect of such outstanding securities, in either case as a result of a
      recapitalization, reclassification, dividend (other than a regular,
      quarterly cash dividend) or other distribution, stock split, reverse
      stock split or the like, then, unless the Company shall determine
      otherwise, the term "Restricted Shares" shall, from and after the date
      of such event, include such cash, property and/or securities so
      distributed in respect of the Restricted Shares, or into or for which
      the Restricted Shares are so increased, decreased, exchanged or
      converted.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1716 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1716

    To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting the Environmental 
                           Protection Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2017

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Soto, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. McCollum, Ms. 
Jackson Lee, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
 Huffman, Mr. McGovern, and Mr. Cohen) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting the Environmental 
                           Protection Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING FREEZE FROM AFFECTING ENVIRONMENTAL 
              PROTECTION AGENCY.

    The memorandum titled ``Presidential Memorandum Regarding the 
Hiring Freeze'' published on January 23, 2017, or any other 
substantially similar memorandum, Executive order, or other action by 
the President to prevent a department or agency of the Federal 
Government from filling vacant Federal civilian employee positions or 
creating new such positions, shall have no force or effect with respect 
to positions within the Environmental Protection Agency.
                                 <all>
```