In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-1139V

Filed: June 24, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LARRY THOMPSON, *

*

Petitioner, *

v. *

* Attorney Fees and Costs; Stipulation

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

William Cochran, Esq., Black, McLaren, Jones, Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN for 

petitioner.

Lara Englund, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On November 24, 2014, Larry Thompson filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that he developed a “shoulder injury 

related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral arthritis, 

and shoulder pain resulting from adverse effects of a [tetanus, diphtheria, acellular 

pertussis] TDaP vaccination administer on January 27, 2014.” Petition at 1. On April

28, 2015, I issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on

respondent’s proffer.

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend 

to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 

U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify 

and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted 

invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will 

redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

On June 22, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Regarding Final 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties agree upon an 

award of $17,250.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order 

#9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 

U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). I find the proposed amount to be reasonable.

Accordingly, I award the total $17,250.003 as a lump sum in the form of a 

check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel William Cochran.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Denise K. Vowell 

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master

 

3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all 

charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. 

Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including 

costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924 

F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 

See Vaccine Rule 11(a).