alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended  December 31, 2005 (the  "Report") of SMI  Products,  Inc.,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, James Charuk,  Chief  Financial  Officer of SMI  Products,  Inc.,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.


Dated: March 30, 2006                        /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                             ___________________________
                                                 James Charuk
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Operating Experience Assessment — Effects of Grid Events on Nuclear Power Plant Performance (NUREG-1784)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1784 (PDF - 7.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2003**Date Published:**December 2003

**Prepared by:** W.S. Raughley, G.F. Lanik

Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Deregulation of the electrical industry has resulted in major changes to the structure of the industry over the past few years. Whereas before, electric utilities produced the electricity and operated the transmission and distribution system, that is no longer the case. In many states, the electric utilities have split into separate generating companies, and transmission and distribution companies. Most nuclear power plant (NPP) operators no longer have control of the transmission and distribution system operations. NPPs rely on outside entities to maintain adequate reactive and voltage support for NPP operation. An assessment was completed by the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) to identify changes to grid performance relative to NPPs which could impact safety. The assessment also provides some numerical measures to characterize grid performance before and after deregulation — in particular, those related to loss of offsite power (LOOP).

The information gathered1 provides a baseline of grid performance to gauge the impact of deregulation and changes in grid operation. The period 1985—1996 was considered "before deregulation" and 1997—2001 "after deregulation." The assessment found that major changes related to LOOPs after deregulation compared to before include the following: (1) the frequency of LOOP events at NPPs has decreased; (2) the average duration of LOOP events has increased; (3) where before LOOPs occurred more or less randomly throughout the year, for 1997—2001, most LOOP events occurred during the summer; and (4) the probability of a LOOP as a consequence of a reactor trip has increased.

The assessment re-enforces the need for NPP licensees and NRC to understand the condition of the grid throughout the year to assure that the risk due to potential grid conditions remains acceptable.

1 This work was completed prior to the August 14, 2003, blackout that affected several states and Canada.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Cardinal Publishing Company, Appellant, vs. City of Madison, Respondent. [Two cases.]

*May 12*

June *20, 1932.*

*519For the appellant there was a brief by Sanborn, *Blake & Aberg*of Madison, and oral argument by *John B. Sanborn.*

*Theodore G. Lewis,*city attorney, for the respondent.

RosenberRY, C. J.

It appears from the findings of the court that twenty per cent, of the printing income of the plaintiff in the year 1928 was derived from printing the East Side News and the West Side News. For the year 1929 the plaintiff’s printing income from the same sources was 7.5 per cent, of its gross income, to which might be added the printing of the Central High School Mirror, 3.2 per cent., which would make its income from activities not' associated with the University equal to 10.7 per cent, of its total income.

It is not considered necessary to again review the law which was declared when the matter was here on the former appeal. It is evident that the use made by the plaintiff of its property for non-exempt purposes cannot be claimed as incidental, negligible, or inconsequential. It is clearly substantial. ;

It is sought here to justify the plaintiff’s position upon the theory ;thát the property used for the non-exempt pur*520poses was property which was necessarily employed by the plaintiff for purposes which are exempt and that the use of the property when not employed for purposes which are exempt should not destroy the exemption. This construction would create an entirely new exemption statute. If the plaintiff wishes to claim the benefit of the exemption it should keep itself within the field prescribed by the legislature. Whether it goes out of that field or not is a matter of choice. It may stay in and receive the exemption. It may depart from it and pay its taxes. It has chosen to depart, therefore its property is subject to taxation.

*By the Court.*— Judgment in each case is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF GLOBIX CORPORATION

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 of Globix Corporation ("the Company").

         I, Robert M. Dennerlein, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify that:

                  (iii)    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
                           Section 780(d) ); and

                  (iv)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003

                                                     /s/ Robert M. Dennerlein
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Name:  Robert M. Dennerlein

                                       25
No. 91-6087.

#### Sides *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2015191EN.01000401.xml

| 9.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 June 2015

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2015/C 191/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Greek government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for Greece on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Mr Dimitrios SKIADAS. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for Greece on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Mr Dimitrios SKIADAS.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2015,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following persons are hereby appointed as members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES:

| GREECE | Mr Dimitrios CHASAPIS |
| --- | --- |

GREECE

Mr Dimitrios CHASAPIS

Done at Luxembourg, 8 June 2015.

For the Council

The President

D. REIZNIECE-OZOLA

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1967 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 to authorize 

pumped storage hydropower development utilizing multiple Bureau of Reclamation reservoirs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1967 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Reclamation 

3 Pumped Storage Hydropower Development Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR PUMPED STORAGE HYDROPOWER 

5 DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING MULTIPLE BU6 REAU OF RECLAMATION RESERVOIRS. 

7 Section 9(c)(1) of the Reclamation Project Act of 

8 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)(1)) is amended by inserting 

9 ‘‘and pumped storage hydropower development exclusively 

10 utilizing Bureau of Reclamation reservoirs’’ after ‘‘includ11 ing small conduit hydropower development’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Available in Adams

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) – 2019

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1980-1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COREY A. McDOWELL BEY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4764

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 27, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge. 

Corey A. McDowell Bey, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7945** 

CHRISTOPHER J. WITCHER , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. FRANK BISHOP, Warden N.B.C.I.; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 03385

- RWT )

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher J. Witcher, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher J. Witcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a c ircuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When t he district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debata ble claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Witcher has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to pro ceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1





Independent Auditors Consent





To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of


Accenture Ltd:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-100116) and Form S-8 (No. 333-65376) of Accenture Ltd of our report dated October 10, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Accenture Ltd as of August 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the August 31, 2002 annual report on Form
10-K of Accenture Ltd.





/S/    KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois


November 7, 2002
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1911 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor 

and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. VEASEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Envoy to Mon5 itor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

7 Congress finds that since the Global Anti-Semitism 

8 Review Act of 2004 was enacted, in many foreign coun9 tries acts of anti-Semitism have been frequent and wide 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1911 IH

1 in scope, the perpetrators and variety of threats to Jewish 

2 communities and their institutions have proliferated, and 

3 in some countries anti-Semitic attacks have increased in 

4 frequency, scope, violence, and deadliness. 

5 SEC. 3. MONITORING AND COMBATING ANTI-SEMITISM. 

6 Subsection (a) of section 59 of the State Department 

7 Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2731) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

10 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

11 (i) by inserting before the period at 

12 the end the following: ‘‘, who shall be ap13 pointed by the President, by and with the 

14 advice and consent of the Senate’’; and 

15 (ii) by adding at the end the following 

16 new sentence: ‘‘The Special Envoy shall re17 port directly to the Secretary.’’; and 

18 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

19 (i) by striking the first sentence; and 

20 (ii) in the third sentence, by striking 

21 ‘‘The Secretary may allow such officer or 

22 employee to retain the position (and the 

23 responsibilities associated with such posi24 tion)’’ and inserting ‘‘Such officer or em25 ployee may not retain the position (or the 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1911 IH

1 responsibilities associated with such posi2 tion)’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraphs: 

5 ‘‘(3) DUTIES.—The Special Envoy shall serve 

6 as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts 

7 across, the United States Government relating to 

8 monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti9 Semitic incitement that occur in foreign countries. 

10 ‘‘(4) RANK AND STATUS OF AMBASSADOR.— 

11 The Special Envoy shall have the rank of ambas12 sador. 

13 ‘‘(5) QUALIFICATIONS.—The Special Envoy 

14 should be a person of recognized distinction in the 

15 field of— 

16 ‘‘(A) combating anti-Semitism; or 

17 ‘‘(B) religious freedom.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2


Form
      10-KSB


Ogden
      Golf Co. Corporation


File
      No.
      333-105075











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Ogden
      Golf Co. Corporation (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
      year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
      or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
      and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
      Code.





I,
      Robert
      R. Peterson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:





1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Ogden Golf Co.
      Corporation.








Dated:
                October 31, 2006
            By:
                /s/ Robert R. PetersonRobert
                R. PetersonPrincipal
                Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jack M. Rapport, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Zanett, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have;

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this annual report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to
          adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Jack M. Rapport
------------------------------
Name: Jack M. Rapport
Title: Chief Financial Officer