alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Guarantee Letter



 Exhibit 10.72 

 

 

  
 Guarantee
Letter Regarding the Purchasing of the Land and the Buildings between MFC and WGSZ 
 2011 

1 6 
 00046543 (2004) 
 20901 32,313,566.00 

Whereas, Wearnes Global (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (WGSZ) and Mflex Suzhou Co., Ltd. (MFC) signed the AGREEMENT FOR SALES OF
BUILDINGS IN STOCK and a Supplement Agreement, and the FUND TRUSTEESHIP AGREEMENT (“Agreements”) on January 6, 2011. WGSZ sold the building and land (Building Property Right Certificate Number: Wuzhong 00046543; Land Certificate Number:
Wuzhong 2004-20901) located at South Yuehu Rd., Puzhuang Town, Wuzhong District, Suzhou at the price of RMB 32,313,566.00 (“Purchase Price”) to MFC; furthermore, according to the Agreements, the Purchase Price shall be deposited into the
account of and kept by Lin Hu Real Estate Bureau (“Management Center”) which is entrusted by the parties. The Purchase Price shall be transferred to WGSZ when MFC has received the certificates of both the land and the building. 

Therefore, based on the above mentioned Agreements, WGSZ hereby makes further commitments to MFC as follows regarding the
trusteeship and transfer of the Purchase Price: 
 WGSZ and MFC entrusts the Management Center for managing the
Purchase Price. WGSZ agrees that it is subject to MFC’s approval that the Purchase Price is deposited into WGSZ’s account after MFC has received the new Land Certificate and the Building Certificate reflecting the transfer herein. WGSZ
shall apply for the Purchase Price transfer together with MFC. 
 (4) 

However, notwithstanding the Agreements, if due to reasons not attributable to MFC that MFC is unable to obtain the
Building Certificate and/or the Land Certificate within Four (4) months after the execution of the Agreements, WGSZ shall refund the Purchase Price to MFC. At that time, MFC is entitled to applying for such refund in the Management Center upon
a unilateral written notice. If any other requirement by the Management Center, WGSZ shall cooperate with MFC and the Management Center in an active manner to get the Purchase Price returned to MFC. 








 

 

  
 When the
Purchase Price is refunded to MFC by the Management Center due the reason as above, the parties may opt to terminate the Agreements or continuously perform the Agreements. If WGSZ decides to sell the buildings and lands herein to a third party, it
shall give MFC a 6 months written notice in prior. 
 Wearnes Global (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Date: 2011.1.6
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1919 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1919

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify eligibility for 
                         the child tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

  Mr. Ferguson (for himself, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Barton, Mr. 
  Grothman, and Mr. Franks of Arizona) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify eligibility for 
                         the child tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Tax Credit Protection Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 24(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``under this section to a taxpayer'' and 
all that follows and inserting ``under this section to any taxpayer 
unless--
            ``(1) such taxpayer includes the taxpayer's valid 
        identification number (and, in the case of a joint return, the 
        valid identification number of the taxpayer's spouse) on the 
        return of tax for the taxable year, and
            ``(2) with respect to any qualifying child, the taxpayer 
        includes the name and taxpayer identification number of such 
        qualifying child on such return of tax.''.
    (b) Valid Identification Number.--Section 24(e) of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Valid identification number.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `valid identification number' means a 
        social security number issued to an individual by the Social 
        Security Administration. Such term shall not include a TIN 
        issued by the Internal Revenue Service.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Release of Radionuclides and Chelating Agents from Full-System Decontamination Ion-Exchange Resins (NUREG/CR-6766,INEEL/EXT-01-01681)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6766 (PDF - 2.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2001**Date Published:**March 2002

**Prepared by:** Douglas W. Akers

 Nuclear and Radiological Physics Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-3129

P.R. Reed, NRC Project Manager 

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code A6359 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As part of a study being performed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), small-scale waste specimens were collected following an AP/CAN-DEREM full-system decontamination of the reactor vessel of the Indian Point 2 reactor vessel in March 1995. CAN-DEREM is a modified version of a reduction process developed by Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. for that country's heavy-water CANDU reactors. The INEEL research was undertaken to support licensing needs for reviewing radiological and chemical data and information to address uncertainties associated with disposal of low-level radioactive decontamination waste in performance assessment modeling. This report presents information on radionuclide and chelate characteristics of decontamination radwaste on ion-exchange resins. The information is expected to reduce uncertainties associated with developing radionuclide inventories for the performance assessment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: August 2, 2006 /s/ Craig P. R. Joffe   Craig P. R. Joffe   Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Edward W. Stone, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007, of VelocityExpress Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation, and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 13, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to VelocityExpress Corporation and will be retained by Velocity Express Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
AMERALINK, INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# A Comparative Analysis of LWR Fuel Designs (NUREG-1754)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1754 (PDF 5.97 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2001**Date Published:** December 2001

**Prepared by:** G. M. O'Donnell, H. H. Scott, R. 0. Meyer

Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In 1980, NRC published a comparative analysis of LWR fuel designs, and that report served as a handy reference for typical design and operating parameters for all types of fuel then in operation in U.S. power reactors. During the past twenty years, significant changes have been made in fuel designs, burnups, and analytical computer codes. The present report is an update of the earlier report. Typical fuel design parameters are tabulated for almost all fuel types in current operation, from BWR 8x8 bundles to PWR 17x17 assemblies. Cross-section diagrams are given for BWR fuel bundles and PWR fuel assemblies. Calculated values are plotted for thirteen operating parameters including fuel centerline temperature, cladding O.D. temperature, gap conductance, rod internal gas pressure, and cladding hoop stress. The calculated values are plotted as a function of fuel burnup to 65 GWd/t for a variety of power histories, covering a range from low to high linear heat ratings, which are constant early in life but decline later in a realistic manner.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# A Nonparametric Statistical Methodology for the Design and Analysis of Final Status Decommissioning Surveys - Interim Draft Report for Comment and Use (NUREG-1505, Revision 1)

This NUREG-series publication was issued as a draft report for public comment and interim use, and the comment period is now closed.

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1505, Revision 1 - Interim Draft Report for Comment and Use (PDF - 12.6 MB)

For information about how the NRC handles your comments, see our Privacy Policy.

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 1998**Date Published:** June 1998

**Prepared by:**C.V. Gogolak*, G.E. Powers, A.M. Huffert

*Environmental Measurements LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy201 Varick Street, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10014

Division of Regulatory ApplicationsOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes a nonparametric statistical methodology for the design and analysis of final status decommissioning surveys in support of the final rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the Federal Register on July 21, 1997. The techniques described are expected to be applicable to a broad range of circumstances, but do not preclude the use of alternative methods as particular situations may warrant. Nonparametric statistical methods for testing compliance with decommissioning criteria are provided both for the case in which the radionuclides of concern occur in background and also for the case in which they do not occur in background. The tests described are the Sign test, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, and a Quantile test. These tests are performed in conjunction with an Elevated Measurement Comparison to provide confidence that the radiological criteria specified for license termination are met. The Data Quality Objectives process is used for the planning of final site surveys. This includes methods for determining the number of samples needed to obtain statistically valid comparisons with decommissioning criteria and the methods for conducting the statistical tests with the resulting sample data.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 31.1**
Rule 13a – 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Christian L. Allison, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TollgradeCommunications, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2004 /s/ Christian L. AllisonName: Christian L. AllisonTitle: Chief Executive Officer
39
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Environmental Monitoring of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (NUREG-1388)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1388 (PDF – 9.65 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 1989**Date Published:** December 1989

E. Y. Shum, R. J. Starmer, M. H. Young

Division of Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This branch technical position (BTP) paper on the environmental monitoring program for a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility provides general guidance on what is required by Section 61.53 of Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) of applicants submitting a license application for such a facility. In general, the environmental monitoring program consists of three phases: preoperational, operational, and postoperational. Each phase of the monitoring program should be designed to fulfill the specific objectives defined in the BTP paper. During the preoperational phase, the objectives of the program are to provide site characterization information, to demonstrate site suitability and acceptability, to obtain background or baseline information, and to provide a record for public information. During the operational phase, the emphasis on measurement shifts. Monitoring data are obtained to provide early warning of releases and to document compliance with regulations, the dose limits of 10 CFR Part 61, or applicable standards of the U S. Environmental Protection Agency. Data are also used to update important pathway parameters to improve predictions of site performance and to provide a record of performance for public information. The postoperational environmental monitoring program emphasizes measurements to demonstrate compliance with the site-closure requirements and continued compliance with the performance objective in regard to the release of radionuclides to the environment. The data are used to support evaluation of long-term effects on the general public and for public information. Guidance is also provided in the BTP paper on the choice of which constituents to measure, setting action levels, relating measurements to appropriate actions in a corrective action plan, and quality assurance.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Miller, Respondent, vs. Melin, Defendant: Barger and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Geo. W. Taylor*of Kenosha'.

For the respondent: *Olwell & Brady*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Orders affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


	To:	China Health Resource, Inc.
	 	343 Sui Zhou Zhong Road
	 	Suining City, Sichuan Province
	 	People’s Republic of China
	 	 
	Date:	January 26, 2011
	 	 
	Re:	Resignation


 


 


To the Board of Directors:


 


It has been a pleasure to serve as member of
the Board of Directors for China Health Resource, Inc. (“Company”). I hereby respectfully, submit my resignation to
depart as a member of the Board of Directors, effective immediately. There are no disagreements between the parties.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Gewei Wang


Gewei Wang