alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-20-1997
<CASH>                                             67,900
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      28,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        44,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  174,200
<PP&E>                                            670,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                    392,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    550,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             177,500
<BONDS>                                           407,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (95,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      550,200
<SALES>                                           555,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  555,700
<CGS>                                             160,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     537,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 18,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                          500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   800
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.02
        

</TABLE>
No. 91-679.

#### T. Harris Young & Associates, Inc. *v.*Marquette Electronics, Inc.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.1






UGI CORPORATION

DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

FOR

ROBERT C. FLEXON




Mr. Flexon has an oral compensation arrangement with UGI Corporation which includes the following
effective February 14, 2011:



Mr. Flexon:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	1.	 	 	 
	 	is entitled to an annual base salary, which for fiscal year 2011 is

$475,020;

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	2.	 	 	 
	 	participates in UGI Corporation’s annual bonus plan, with bonus

payable based on the achievement of pre-approved financial and/or

business performance objectives, which support business plans and

strategic goals;

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	3.	 	 	 
	 	participates in UGI Corporation’s long-term compensation plan, the

2004 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended, with annual

awards as determined by the Compensation and Management Development

Committee;

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	4.	 	 	 
	 	will receive cash benefits upon termination of his employment

without “cause” or if he terminates employment for “good reason”

following a change in control of UGI Corporation; and

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	5.	 	 	 
	 	participates in UGI Corporation’s benefit plans, including the

Senior Executive Employee Severance Plan and the 2009 Supplemental

Executive Retirement Plan for New Employees.
SERVED: JUNE 17, 2014 

·:-;J)~TMENT Or 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO:t;J?:!;!SPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS .. , '"··;.:-· C·;)-r. \ ..,.10' 'S 

In The Matter Of: 

LIBERTY 

FOUNDATION, INC. 

Respondent 

__,vr\1...1 Jl ttiPd ,'J 

WASIDNGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Zfill! JUN 18 A c;: 3~ 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0477 

Case No. 2011-GL-03-0070 

· ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES' 

JOINT PROPOSED CLOSING ARGUMENT SCHEDULE 

On April2, 2014 an Order Denying the FAA's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

and Declaring as Established Certain Undisputed Facts was filed. 

From April22, 2014 through April25, 2014 the parties presented testimony and other 

evidence at a scheduled Hearing in Atlanta, GA. 

On April 25, 2014, at the conclusion ofthe Hearing, the parties' joint motion to file a 

post-hearing closing argument schedule on or before June 11, 2014 was granted. 

On June 13, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Written Closing Argument Schedule. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(6), and after having reviewed all relevant caselaw, 

decisions, regulations, statutory authority, inot~ons, pleadings, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The parties' Joint Proposed Written Closing Argument Schedule is hereby adopted: 

a) June 30,2014: Deadline for filing FAA's closing argument 

b) August 8, 2014: Deadline for filing Respondent's closing argument 

c) September 8, 2~14: Deadline for filing FAA's closing rebuttal argument 

Attachment: Service List 
,-

• 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal _Aviation Administration 1 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 

Mr. Christopher Stevenson 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Stuart A. Goldstein 

Respondent's Counsel 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P .A. 

7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 

Miami, FL 33156 

TEL: 305-670-1222 

FAX: 305-400-0685 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation _ 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0477 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail.- For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Doc~et Clerk, AGC-430. 

Page 2 of2
#### Wainco Funding, Appellant, v First American Title Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 81]

*599In an action to recover under a title insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered December 22, 1993, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment in its favor.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The subject title insurance policy provided that in the event the insured failed to "promptly notify” the insurer of "any lien or encumbrance insured against”, the insurer’s liability would terminate, "provided that [the] failure to notify shall in no case prejudice the claim of any insured unless the [insurer] shall be actually prejudiced by such failure”. It is undisputed that the plaintiff mortgagee did not notify the defendant insurer of a tax lien foreclosure proceeding against the mortgaged premises until the plaintiff had unsuccessfully appealed from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, which was in favor of the City of Newburgh. Thus, notification did not occur until approximately 20 months after the plaintiff insured claims that it first learned of the proceeding. By depriving the defendant of the opportunity to participate in the tax lien proceeding in any way, the plaintiff’s failure to give notice actually prejudiced the defendant *(see, Hovdestad v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co.,*135 AD2d 783, 784). Because the plaintiff’s submissions were insufficient to raise an issue of fact in this regard, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562). Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
No. D-1042.

#### In re Disbarment of McLellan.

[For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 923.]

Disbarment entered.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: July 29, 2005
1

QUESTIONNAIRE

(Please include a copy of this form with each filing of your rule: Notice of Public Hearing or Comment Period; Proposed

Rule, and if needed, Emergency and Modified Rule.) 

DATE: 

TO: LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING REVIEW COMMITTEE 

FROM:(Agency Name, Address & Phone No.) 

LEGISLATIVE RULE TITLE: 

1. Authorizing statute(s) citation 

2. a. Date filed in State Register with Notice of Hearing or Public Comment Period:

b. What other notice, including advertising, did you give of the hearing?

c. Date of Public Hearing(s) or Public Comment Period ended:

d. Attach list of persons who appeared at hearing, comments received, amendments, reasons

for amendments.

Attached No comments received 
2

e. Date you filed in State Register the agency approved proposed Legislative Rule following

public hearing: (be exact)

f. Name, title, address and phone/fax/e-mail numbers of agency person(s) to receive

all written correspondence regarding this rule: (Please type)

g. IF DIFFERENT FROM ITEM ‘f’, please give Name, title, address and phone

number(s) of agency person(s) who wrote and/or has responsibility for the contents of this

rule: (Please type)

3. If the statute under which you promulgated the submitted rules requires certain findings and

determinations to be made as a condition precedent to their promulgation:

a. Give the date upon which you filed in the State Register a notice of the time and place

of a hearing for the taking of evidence and a general description of the issues to be

decided.
3

b. Date of hearing or comment period:

c. On what date did you file in the State Register the findings and determinations required

together with the reasons therefor?

d. Attach findings and determinations and reasons:

Attached
NEON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(formerly GLOBIX CORPORATION)

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEON Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kurt Van Wagenen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August
        9, 2007 |  |                                 | 
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | 
|                             |  | /s/ Kurt Van
        Wagenen    | 
|                             |  |                                 | 
|                             |  |                                 | 
|                             |  | Kurt Van Wagenen                | 
|                             |  | Chief Executive
        Officer | 

-35-

---
#### Arrington *v.*Battle.

¡>From Nash.

Question of costs. In an action of detinue, tlie parties refer the case to arbitration. The arbitrators award, that the Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff the slave sued for, and that the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant the purchase money for the slaves ; but were silent as to the costs of the suit. Held, that each party shall pay his own costs.

This was an application- for a writ of *supersedeas,*to set aside an execution for costs. Battle had instituted two suits against Arrington, one in detinue, and the other in trespass for false imprisonment. After issue joined, both causes were referred by the parties to arbitrators, who awarded that in the action of detinue, Ar-rington should return to Battle the negro woman sued for and her increase, and that Battle should pay to Ar-rington the purchase money. In the action of trespass, they awarded that Arrington should pay Battle *£2,50,*and costs, Arrington delivered the negro according to the award in the action of detinue, but refused to pay the costs, to obtain which, Battle issued an execution. It was the object of the present application to set aside this execution. The affidavit and certificate of two of the arbitrators were filed, in which they stated their intention to have been, that Arrington should pay the . costs in both actions.

Ham, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The only question that can arise here is with respect to the action of detinue. In that action, the arbitrators directed the negro to be delivered up by Arrington, and a certain sum of money to be paid by Battle. Thus the rights of the parties, n ith respect to the subject matter of the suit were settled. This court is not applied to, to set that award aside $ there is no law, which in a case situated as this is, *directs*that either party shall pay the \yhole cost,?. Upon legal principles then it will follow, *247that,each parly shall pay his own costs to the Clerk, as-for work and labor done. Those costs being ‘ascertained* . .. the Clerk is at liberty to issue an execution against each jiarty separately. In Ihe other action, Arrington mtet pay the costs, because thte arbitrators have said' so.
**Exhibit24**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

Each director of Pacifica Bancorp Inc. (the“Company”), whose signature appears below, hereby appoints Jeffery C. Low,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, as his attorney to sign, inhis name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, the Company’sconsolidated Form 10-KSB and Annual Report (the “Annual Report”), andlikewise to sign any and all amendments and other documents relating thereto,each such person hereby granting to such attorney power to act with or withoutthe other and full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifyingall that such attorney or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

 

This Power of Attorney has been signed by thefollowing persons in the capacities indicated, on March 12, 2002.

 
| **Signature**      |                      | **Title** |   |   |
|--------------------|---------------------------|-----------|--------|--------|
|               |                      |      |
| /s/ Jeffery C. Low |                      |      |   |
| Jeffery C. Low     | Chairman                  |      |
|               |                      |      |
| /s/ Yi-Heng Lee    |                      |      |   |
| Yi-Heng Lee        | Director                  |      |
|               |                      |      |
|               | /s/ Mark P. Levy          |      |   |   |
|               | Mark P. Levy              | Director  |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ Robert E. Peterson    |      | r      |   |
|               | Robert E. Peterson        | Directo   |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ George J. Pool        |      |   |   |
|               | George J. Pool            | Director  |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ Lyle K. Snyder        |      |   |   |
|               | Lyle K. Snyder            | Director  |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ Fannie Kuei-Fang Tsai |      |   |   |
|               | Fannie Kuei-Fang Tsai     | Director  |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ Mark W. Weber         |      |   |   |
|               | Mark W. Weber             | Director  |   |
|               |                      |      |   |
|               | /s/ Edwin R. Young        |      |   |
|               | Edwin R. Young            | Director  |
|                    |                           |           |        |        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001002813
 
<NAME>                        Dignity Partners, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         18,517,258
<SECURITIES>                                    4,139,711
<RECEIVABLES>                                     305,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                              
<INVENTORY>                                    42,383,819 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  839,806
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 66,185,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,201,546
<BONDS>                                        39,084,011 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           42,918
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,857,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   66,185,709
<SALES>                                           184,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,993,422
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  894,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                938,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   160,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               160,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   934,693
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,095,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.27  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0

<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND PURCHASED LIFEINSURANCE POLICY.
<F2>REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY. 

</FN>
 
        

</TABLE>
MK

EPA base m8

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek 43 15 44 11 51 24 46 17 39%

Hercules-Glades 198 295 199 227 39%

Upper Buffalo 31 15 28 15 42 14 34 15 26%

Wichita Mountains 24 10 23

9 30 17 26 12 23%

LNB

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek 25

4 216 38 11 287

Hercules-Glades 134 164 126 145

Upper Buffalo 25

9 196 319 258

Wichita Mountains 18

5 188 238 207

DFGD

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek

10106130

Hercules-Glades10110010

Upper Buffalo

30212020

Wichita Mountains

10302020

SO

EPA base 1ppb m8

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek 15

4 132 133 143 63%

Hercules-Glades 124619092 67%

Upper Buffalo 15

471 111 112 55%

Wichita Mountains 34 17 38 14 43 23 38 18 36%

LNB

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average
Caney Creek

81215251

Hercules-Glades51202030

Upper Buffalo

72404151

Wichita Mountains 22

9 227 30 13 25 10

DFGD

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek

00000000

Hercules-Glades00000000

Upper Buffalo

00000000

Wichita Mountains

40105231

NE

EPA base 1ppb m8

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek 29 11 31

8 31 11 30 10 45%

Hercules-Glades 237 125 177 176 38%

Upper Buffalo 26 11 17

4 218 218 45%

Wichita Mountains 20 10 17

5 34 17 24 11 32%

LNB

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek 18

7 165 167 176

Hercules-Glades 13572 125 114

Upper Buffalo 15

561 146 124

Wichita Mountains 14

591 25 14 167

DFGD

0.51 0.51 0.51 >0.5 >1

Caney Creek

20100010

Hercules-Glades10000000

Upper Buffalo

20000010

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average

2001 2002 2003 average
Wichita Mountains 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0
58%

36%

45%

42%

56%

80%

50%

46%
37%

37%

48%

38%
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended  December 31, 2003 (the  "Report") of SMI Products,  Inc., as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James Charuk,  Chief Executive Officer of SMI Products,  Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.


Dated: March 30, 2004                           /s/ JAMES CHARUK
                                               _________________________________
                                                    James Charuk
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO SMI PRODUCTS,  INC.,  AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY SMI PRODUCTS,  INC.,  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.