UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                              FORM 10-KSB

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                       FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED:  September 30, 2003

                       COMMISSION FILE NO.:   000-50240

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                       FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____ TO _____

                        CLAREMONT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
          -------------------------------------------------
           (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

            Nevada                            98-0338263
-----------------------------------    -----------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of              (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)               Identification No.)


1374 Cartier Place,
Vancouver, BC                                     V6P 2W9
-----------------------------------------    -----------------------
(Address of principle executive offices)        ( Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number:  (604) 647-3447
                            -----------------------

Former Name and Address:

         Suite 2120, 1066 West Hastings Street
         Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada  V6E 3X3

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:  None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

         Common Stock, $0.001 par value
         ------------------------------------
          (Title of Class)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed
By Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.            YES [x]    NO [ ]

Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.   [ ]

Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year is NIL.

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-
affiliates of the Registrant as of January 26, 2004 is $9,955,200.
At January 26, 2003 our stock's closing price was $0.61 per share.
This price, however, is an inter-dealer price without retail mark-
up, mark-down or commission and may not represent an actual
transaction.

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

24,800,000 SHARES OF $0.001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK ARE ISSUED AS OF
FEBRUARY 2, 2004 AND 16,320,000 ARE OUTSTANDING.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
                                                    Yes [ ] No [ x ]

<PAGE>

PART 1

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-KSB constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933,as amended (the "Securities Act"), and
Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements, identified by
words such as "plan", "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "should,"
"expect" and similar expressions, include our expectations and
objectives regarding our future financial position, operating
results and business strategy. These statements reflect the current
views of management with respect to future events and are subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be
materially different from those described in the forward-looking
statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth
under the captions "Description of Business", "Management's
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" and elsewhere in this
Form 10-KSB. We do not intend to update the forward-looking
information to reflect actual results or changes in the factors
affecting such forward-looking information.

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Background

We were incorporated on September 14, 1999 under the laws of the
state of Nevada. At our incorporation, we were engaged in the
business of developing an internet computer software program known
as Clear Switch; a program that processes submission of internet web
page information to major internet search engines.  Subject to the
necessary funding for development and completion of its software,
Claremont anticipated that the development of the first tool of its
proprietary software, Clear Switch Manager, to be completed by
October 2003. The Company's plans were to integrate the software
with the website, so it can be sold immediately after completion.
Subsequent products including the Clear Switch Repeater, the Clear
Switch Bridge, the Clear Switch Router, and the Clear Switch Complex
were to be developed and released at a rate of one tool per quarter,
depending on sales and financing, until all four tools in the
Claremont suite of products had been completed.  Although we
attempted to develop this software program, we suspended these
efforts due to our insufficient cash flow and inability to obtain
financing to conduct further development of this software program.

In July 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 3.2
for 1 split of its common stock.  The stock split was effected by
way of a stock dividend to the Company's shareholders of record as
at July 28, 2003. Each shareholder of record was issued 2.2
additional shares of the Company's common stock for each 1 share
held on the payment date of July 28, 2003.  The Company's common
stock was traded on a post-split (ex-dividend) basis on July 29,
2003.  As of July 29, 2003, the total issued and outstanding shares
of the Company 16,320,000 common shares.

On August 22, 2003, a share exchange agreement between Claremont
Technologies Corp. and the shareholders of Safe Cell Tab, Inc.("SCT"),
was executed so the Company can acquire 100% of the shares of Safe Cell
Tab Inc. making it a wholly owned subsidiary. As of February 2, 2004
the share exchange agreement has not been completed.

GENERAL

The share exchange agreement of Safe Cell Tab, Inc. was undertaken
as a means of complimenting, augmenting and extending the early stage
activities and business plans of the Company.  The SCT share exchange
agreement will result in the addition of gross revenues to the
consolidated balance sheet of the Company, as a result of sales from
the Safe Cell Tab products, and the acquisition of a master distributor
Wi-Fi License which had been acquired and paid for by Safe Cell Tab,
Inc.

The Safe Cell tab is a small, thin, oval shaped device designed
specifically to help protect the users of cell phones, cordless
phones, laptops, microwaves and any other hand held devices such as
palm pilots from the potentially harmful and damaging effects of
electromagnetic radiation (electromagnetic frequencies or "EMF")
which is emitted from these and other electrical devices. The Safe
Cell tab simply adheres to the back of the cell phone or electronic
device where the waves are absorbed by a conductive fibrous material
called 'Shieldron'. The product is designed to reduce the biological
effects of long term exposure to EMF.

The Safe Cell tab was designed and patented by a South Korean
manufacturing company named Milae Electronics [Korean Patent
#094419] and is now distributed under a world wide exclusive
distribution and supply agreement by Safe Cell Tab, Inc.  The Safe
Cell tab product is made from a superconductive polyester fiber.
This conductive material blocks EMF waves. Shieldron is manufactured
by EM Solutions, Inc. of Soeul, Korea. Conductive fibers were
originally developed by NASA (National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Agency) to address the hazards associated with
radiation from electromagnetic waves in outer space.  EM Solutions
has taken this technology and/or concept and developed Shieldron.
Today, the Shieldron technology is mass produced and the
manufacturer, EM Solutions, Inc., carries the Korean NT mark (new
technology small and medium business administration), KT mark
(ministry of science and technology), and UL mark (standards, tests,
and authentication of electrical and electronics industry) of
quality assurance and quality control. This technology is used in a
wide range of industries to not only help protect humans but also to
prevent malfunctioning of devices and damaging effects of EMF
radiation.

The Company received two independent laboratory reports testing the
Safe Cell tab product. The efficiency tests conducted were performed
to US ASTM standards (American Society for Testing and Materials).
One report came from the Korea Research Institute of Standards and
Science dated July 12, 1993.  The other report is from the Kansai
Electronic Industry Development Center of Japan dated October 4,
1999. The tests indicated almost no electromagnetic waves remained
after filtering through the Shieldron layer. The absorbed
electromagnetic waves changed into heat energy and dissipated. The
tests were specific to test shielding effectiveness of frequencies
up to a range of 1.5 GHz. The tests do not address all of the safety
problems associated with its use.  The shielding effectiveness is
determined by the conductivity of the metal used for the coating.
Accordingly, metals such as gold, silver or aluminum will conduct
and provide better effect of shielding EMF emissions than that of
nickel. The Safe Cell tab product uses aluminum for its coating.
Better conductive material will have a better shielding effect.

Recently, SCT acquired the sales, marketing and distribution
rights to a new completely 'mobile' Wi-Fi [802.11b] (Wireless
Fidelity) distributed wide area network ["DWAN"] system, which
utilizes the proven hardware and software commercially viable
capabilities of a Wi-Fi system called 'Brilan'. Softhill
Technologies, Ltd. developed the Brilan products and partially
branded for SCT.  The Brilan technology provides connectivity and
supporting transmission of data and analog, as well as digital
voice.  It enables digital and analog phones to be accessed in hard
to reach places. To assist in the commercial roll out of the
Brilan's technology, the Company may enlist services of other Wi-Fi
companies. SCT's latest 802.11b Wi-Fi technology license is
also consistent with the Company's mid to long term goals and
mandate of establishing itself as a vertically integrated wireless
communications company, capable of offering a unique value added
series of products and services to its customers.

On October 1 2003, the Company received a letter of interest in
becoming an exclusive distributor for the Mobius mobile phone,
a unique disposable, battery operated cell phone.  This disposable
phone attempts to function as an emergency phone and is aimed at the
entry level of the consumer cellular phone market. The Company plans
to equip the phone with its own Safe Cell tab and proposes to offer
the feature to make collect calls without the need for air time or a
calling card.  Mobius will be ideal for users who don't want long
term commitments. Mobius operates solely on three AA batteries which
are included with the phone and does not have to be pre-charged. No
contract is required. Mobius will be priced reasonably and will be
an affordable item for those with either a limited budget or who want
security at an economical price.

The Company hopes to be in a position to establish more cost
effective and differentiated business solutions for its various
products and services throughout the upcoming fiscal 2004 fiscal
year. Our ability to continue with the business plan is contingent
upon our obtaining additional capital to assist in developing the
concept and the new operational plan. We currently have minimal cash
reserves and a significant working capital deficit.  Accordingly,
our ability to pursue our plan of operations is contingent on our
being able to obtain funding for the development and
commercialization of our products and services.  We plan to commence
an offering in the form of equity financing from the sale of our
common stock in the principal amount of up to $500,000 to persons
who are "accredited investors" in private placement transactions.
There is no assurance we will be able to raise any funds through
this offering.

SUBSIDIARIES

We entered into a share exchange agreement with the shareholders of
Safe Cell Tab, Inc.  The acquisition of Safe Cell Tab makes it a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  With the acquisition of
Safe Cell Tab, Inc., the Company can further evaluate, develop,
manage, fund and exploit the commercialization, sub-license and
commercial sale of these assets. As of February 2, 2004, the share
exchange agreement has not been completed.

PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS

As of the fiscal year end September 30, 2003, we do not legally own
any patents or trademarks.  However, we do currently own the
internet domain of www.claremont-technologies.com.

AGREEMENTS

On October 1 2003, the Company received a letter of interest from
Forward Path LLC in becoming an exclusive distributor for the
disposable phones called Mobius. The letter outlined an initial plan
for a five year period provided that the Company sells a minimum of
50,000 units within its first year and maintaining a minimum market
penetration of 2,500 locations. The Company, in good faith, made an
initial payment of $60,000 to acquire 12,500 units of Mobius phones
on October 27, 2003. To date, the Company has not taken possession of
these Mobius phones as the process of FCC testing and full scale
production has been delayed by Forward Path.  The Company is in
discussions with Forward Path and expects to resolve these issues
immediately.

On December 11, 2003 and with the prior written permission from Safe
Cell Tab, Inc., the Company entered into a master sales and distribution
agreement for the Safe Cell tab products with a company named Innovative
Inventions, Inc. ("I3").  I3 was additionally appointed as both the
Company's and SCT's exclusive e-commerce partner.  I3 is now responsible
for managing the e-commerce sales which have just started to occur via
the Company's web site at www.claremont-technologies.com and at SCT's
website, www.safecelltab.com. The initial two year term of this agreement
requires I3 to purchase a minimum of two hundred thousand (200,000) Safe
Cell tab units with a pre-agreed revenue splitting arrangement.  The
term of this contract may be extended by both parties.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES

As of September 30, 2003 the Company has expended no further monies
on either the research and or development of its various products.
However, the company loaned $25,000 to SCT to help SCT develop
the Safe Cell Tab business.

The company has also undertaken certain development costs which
relate to the creation and maintenance of the corporate web site.
This process is not yet complete and is still ongoing.  The Company
anticipates that this ongoing costs will not exceed $3,750 and
expects ongoing internet maintenance and support costs to be
approximately $300 per month.

In October 2003, the Company expended $60,000 to a company named
Forward Path LLC of Overland Park, Kansas as a partial up-front cash
payment to acquire a stocking inventory of the Mobius phone along
with the exclusive rights to market and sell Mobius phones into
various vertical channel markets and retailers associated with the
US electronics market.

COMPETITION

The markets and industries defined by the Company's various products
and services are new, rapidly evolving and intensely competitive.
Claremont expects competition to intensify in the future.
Additionally, these markets are highly fragmented, with no clear
dominant leader and the barriers to entry are fairly minimal as
current and new competitors can commercialize products and services
at a relatively low cost and in a fairly short period of time.

The Company anticipates that its major competitors can be divided
into the following two groups:

i) Competitors for the Company's Wi-Fi products

- various manufacturers of Wi-Fi hardware and software components;
- distributors of Wi-Fi products and services who mainly re-sell
components to specific groups of end users interested in
establishing their own Virtual Private Networks; and
- network systems integrators and consultants who have the ability
to influence the purchasing decisions of their various end user
clients and who represent or promote only select or specific
products.

ii) Competitors for the Companies Safe Cell Tab and Mobius phone
products

- distributors and re-sellers of cell phones and accessories;
- online retailers of cell phones;
- independent online retailers specializing in cellular phone
accessories and alternative health products;
- mail-order and catalog retailers of cellular phone accessories,
some of which have already developed online retail outlets;
- direct sales organizations;
- electronic stores specializing in communications and computer
equipment;
- merchants and mass market retail chains; and
- manufacturers and resellers of pre paid local and long distance
cellular phone cards.

Many of the Company's potential competitors have longer operating
histories, larger customer or user bases, greater brand recognition
and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources
than Claremont currently has.  In addition, an online retailer may
be acquired by, receive investments from, or enter into other
commercial relationships with, larger, well-established and well-
financed companies as use of the internet and other electronic
services increases. Competitors have and may continue to adopt
aggressive pricing or inventory availability policies and devote
substantially more resources to website and systems development than
the Company does. Increased competition may result in reduced
operating margins and loss of market share.

The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in its
market are:

1. the ability to attract and retain customers;
2. the breadth of product selection;
3. the product pricing;
4. the ability to customize products and labeling;
5. the quality and responsiveness of customer service.

The Company believes that it can compete favorably on these factors.
However, the Company will have no control over how successful its
competitors are in addressing these factors. In addition, with
little difficulty, the Company's online competitors can duplicate
many of the products or services offered on the Company's website.
The Company believes that its competitors also face several
challenges in succeeding:

1. Lack of convenience and personalized service. Traditional
retailers have limited store hours and locations. Traditional
retailers are also unable to provide consumers with product advice
tailored to their particular situation.
2. Limited product assortment. The capital and real estate intensive
nature of store-based retailers limit the product selection that can
be - economically offered in each store location.
3. Lack of Customer Loyalty. Although the larger traditional
retailers often attract customers, many of these customers are only
one-time users. People are often attracted to the name brands, but
find the products too expensive. It is understood that these are
quality products and have value, but the multilevel structure of
marketing often employed by large retailers mandate high prices.

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

The manufacturing, processing, packaging, labeling and advertising
of the products that Claremont sells may be subject to regulation by
one or more U.S. federal agencies, including the Federal Trade
Commission, and or the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC").
These activities also may be regulated by various agencies of the
states, localities and foreign countries in which consumers reside.
The Federal Communications Commission, in particular, regulates the
manufacture, labeling and distribution of electronic communication
devices and related ancillary products, including cellular phones,
computer equipment and other electromagnetic frequency emitting
devices and products.

Currently the Company is in the process of marketing several
electronic communication devices in the United States of America.
Some of these devices such as the Mobius phone product
require the manufacturer of the Mobius phone to have the prior
approval of the FCC before we can market in the United States. In
the case of the Mobius phone product, this product requires a series
of tests to be performed on a fully functional Mobius phone device
by an FCC authorized/recognized testing laboratory in order to
demonstrate that this electromagnetic emitting device does not
exceed certain pre-set radiation exposure limits for analog and
digital phones.  For cell phones of this type, the FCC has set a
maximum SAR limit of 1.6 watts/kg (2.21 lb) which these cellular
phones must not exceed.

Certain other devices such as the Wi-Fi divsion's Brilan 802.11b
hardware device, must be "FCC Compliant" prior to being marketed
in the United States. This requires the Company and its manufacturer
to have test data on file which demonstrates that their devices
are compliant with the appropriate FCC guidelines for that
particular device.  As of September 30, 2003, all of the Company's
products have been either FCC approved or are FCC compliant.  The
company is relying upon information in this regard which it has
received from its various device manufacturers as to the validity
of these claims.

The FCC may undertake enforcement actions against companies
marketing either unapproved, or "adulterated" or "misbranded"
products. Various remedies are available to the FCC to either deter
and or prosecute suspected offender or violators and may include:
criminal prosecution; an injunction to stop the sale of a company's
products; seizure of products; adverse publicity; and "voluntary"
recalls and labeling changes. FCC regulations require that certain
informational labeling be presented in a prescribed manner on
certain classes and types of communication products and that these
products not be "misbranded". A product may be deemed as unapproved
and "misbranded" if it bears improper claims or improper labeling.

In addition to the regulatory scrutiny of the FCC, the advertising
and promotion of the Company's products are subject to scrutiny by
the Federal Trade Commission. The Federal Trade Commission Act
prohibits "unfair or deceptive" advertising or marketing practices,
and the Federal Trade Commission has pursued numerous manufacturers
and retailers of electronic communications equipment for deceptive
advertising or failure to substantiate promotional claims,
including, in many instances, claims made via the Internet. The
Federal Trade Commission has the power to seek administrative or
judicial relief prohibiting a wide variety of claims, to enjoin
future advertising, to seek redress or restitution payments and to
seek a consent order and seek monetary penalties for the violation
of a consent order. In general, existing laws and regulations apply
fully to transactions and other activity on the Internet. The
Federal Trade Commission is in the process of reviewing its policies
regarding the applicability of its rules and its consumer protection
guides to the Internet and other electronic media. The Federal Trade
Commission has already undertaken a new monitoring and enforcement
initiative "Operation Cure-All," targeting allegedly bogus health
claims for products and treatments offered for sale on the Internet.
Many states impose their own labeling or safety requirements that
differ from or add to existing federal requirements.

The Company cannot predict the nature of any future U.S. laws,
regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can it determine
what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative
orders, when and if promulgated, would have on its business in the
future. Although the regulation of electronic equipment and or
devices is less restrictive than certain other devices, the Company
cannot assure you that the current statutory scheme and regulations
applicable to its products will remain less restrictive. Further,
Claremont cannot assure you that, under existing laws and
regulations, or if more stringent statutes are enacted, regulations
are promulgated or enforcement policies are adopted, it is or will
be in compliance with these existing or new statutes, regulations or
enforcement policies without incurring material expenses or
adjusting its business strategy. Any laws, regulations, enforcement
policies, interpretations or applications applicable to Claremont's
business could require the reformulation of certain products to meet
new standards, the recall or discontinuance of certain products not
capable of reformulation, additional record keeping, expanded
documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or
different labeling or scientific substantiation. Finally, Claremont
is not aware of any environmental laws that are applicable to the
operation of its business.

REGULATION OF THE INTERNET

In general, existing laws and regulations apply to transactions and
other activity on the internet; however, the precise applicability
of these laws and regulations to the internet is sometimes
uncertain. The vast majority of such laws were adopted prior to the
advent of the internet and, as a result, do not contemplate or
address the unique issues of the internet or electronic commerce.
Nevertheless, numerous federal and state government agencies have
already demonstrated significant activity in promoting consumer
protection and enforcing other regulatory and disclosure statutes on
the internet. Additionally, due to the increasing use of the
internet as a medium for commerce and communication, it is possible
that new laws and regulations may be enacted with respect to the
internet and electronic commerce covering issues such as user
privacy, freedom of expression, advertising, pricing, content and
quality of products and services, taxation, intellectual property
rights and information security. The adoption of such laws or
regulations and the applicability of existing laws and regulations
to the internet may impair the growth of internet use and result in
a decline in the Company's sales.

A number of legislative proposals have been made at the federal,
state and local level, and by foreign governments, that would impose
additional taxes on the sale of goods and services over the
internet, and certain states have taken measures to tax Internet-
related activities. Although Congress recently placed a three-year
moratorium on new state and local taxes on internet access or on
discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce, existing state or local
laws were expressly excepted from this moratorium. Further, once
this moratorium is lifted, some type of federal and/or state taxes
may be imposed upon internet commerce. Such legislation or other
attempts at regulating commerce over the Internet may substantially
impair the growth of commerce on the internet and, as a result,
adversely affect the Company's opportunity to derive financial
benefit from such activities.

EMPLOYEES

Claremont is a development stage company that currently has one
employee. The Company is currently managed by Mr. Dan Steer,
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Steer is a part-time employee. As soon as
time and finances permit, the Company plans to hire additional
employees for its US based operations especially in the areas of
finance, sales, marketing and investor/public relations.  To ensure
that the most appropriate and qualified employees are hired, the
Company anticipates either hiring a qualified human resources person
or outsourcing this responsibility to a qualified third party who is
qualified to aid in this selection process.  Claremont may also
choose to outsource some of its marketing roles by utilizing a
series of independent contractors based on the projected size of the
market and the compensation necessary to retain qualified employees.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Company's head offices are located at 1374 Cartier Place,
Vancouver, BC, V6P 2W9 Canada. The Company's phone number is 604-
647-3447. We are currently sharing office space with Safe Cell Tab,
Inc.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

To the knowledge of the board of directors of Claremont, the Company
is not currently party to any legal proceeding or litigation and
none of our property is the subject of a pending legal proceeding.
We know of no other threatened legal proceeding against the Company.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTER TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003, the majority
stockholders approved a 3.2:1 forward stock split.

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Prior to February 2003, there was no trading market for our common
stock.  We obtained a trading symbol of "CTTG" and began trading on
the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board in February 2003.
Although we have a listing on the Bulletin Board, there is no
assurance that an active, liquid market for our common stock will
develop or that a trading market will continue.

Our common stock is quoted on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin
Board at the present time.  At January 26, 2004, our stock's closing
price was $0.61 per share.  This price, however, is an inter-dealer
price without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not
represent an actual transaction.  The high and low trades for our
shares for each quarter of actual trading were:

<table>
                                                 HIGH              LOW
                                               ---------        ---------

                                           <c>              <c>
     2003*

     Second Quarter                            $  0.00          $  0.00
     Third Quarter                             $  0.00          $  0.00
     Fourth Quarter                            $  0.99          $  0.00

</table>

* The prices are all "closing" prices and appear as approximate
figures and retroactively reflect the 3.2 for one stock split in
July 2003.

The Security and Exchange Commission has adopted a Rule that defines
a "penny stock" for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity
security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or
with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to
certain exceptions. Our common stock is presently considered a
"penny stock" and is subject to such market rules.  The penny stock
rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny
stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared
by the Commission, that: (a) contains a description of the nature
and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public
offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the
broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and
remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to
such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; (c) contains
a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including
bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the
spread between the bid and ask price; (d)contains a toll-free
telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines
terms that are significant in the disclosure document or in the
conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other
information  and is in such form, including language, type, size and
format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation. The
broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction
in a penny stock, the customer with: (a) bid and offer quotations
for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the  broker-dealer and
its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the  number of shares to
which such bid and ask prices apply or other  comparable information
relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock;
and (d) a monthly  account statements showing the market value of
each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the
penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must
make a special written determination that the penny stock is a
suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's
written acknowledgement of the receipt of a risk disclosure
statement, a written agreement of transactions involving penny stock
and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.
These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the
trading activity in the secondary market for our stock.

Holders of Common Stock

There are 24,800,000 outstanding common shares as of February 2,
2004 held by approximately 49 registered stockholders of our common
stock. Based on the information received from brokers and others in
fiduciary capacities, we estimate that the total number of
shareholders of our common stock does not exceed 200. Our shares of
common stock are currently traded on the Over-the-Counters Bulletin
Board under the symbol "CTTG".

Stock Option Grants

To date, we have not granted any stock options.

Dividends

Since our inception, no dividends have been paid on the Company's
common stock. The Company intends to retain any earnings for use in
its business activities, so it is not expected that any dividends on
the common stock will be declared and paid in the foreseeable
future. There are no restrictions in our Articles of Incorporation
or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends. The Nevada
Revised Statutes, however, prohibit us from declaring dividends
where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

i)  we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the
usual course of business;  or

ii)  our total assets would be less than the sum of our total
liabilities, plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the
rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to
those receiving the distribution.

We have neither declared nor paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Our current policy is to retain any earnings in order to
finance the expansion of our operations. Our board of directors will
determine future declaration and payment of dividends, if any, in
light of the then-current conditions they deem relevant and in
accordance with the Nevada Revised Statutes.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On August 22, 2003 we entered into a share exchange agreement with
the shareholders of Safe Cell Tab, Inc.  The acquisition of Safe Cell
Tab makes it a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As of February
2, 2004, the share exchange agreement has not been completed due to
certain conditions precedent which had not been satisfied. The Company
is required to issue 1,000 shares of its common stock for each common
share of Safe Cell Tab's shares of shareholders on record as at August
22, 2003.  A total of 8,480,000 common shares were recently issued and
not outstanding to shareholders of Safe Cell Tab Inc.  The shares
issued constituted restricted securities under the United States
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") and were issued pursuant to
an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. None
of the securities issued were registered.

On September 26, 2000, we completed an offering of 100,000 shares of
our Common stock at a price of $0.20 per share to a total of 20
purchasers. The total amount we received form this offering was
$20,000.  We completed the offering pursuant to Regulation S of the
Securities Act. Each purchaser represented to us that he (she) was a
non-US person as defined in Regulation S.  We did not engage in a
distribution of this offering in the United States.  Each purchaser
represented his (her) intention to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with a view toward distribution. The shares
issued constituted restricted securities under the United States
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") and were issued pursuant to
an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act.
None of the securities issued were registered.

On August 31, 2000, we completed an offering of 3,000,000 shares of
our Common stock at a price of $0.01 per share to a total of 14
purchasers. The total amount we received form this offering was
$30,000.  We completed the offering pursuant to Regulation S of the
Securities Act. Each purchaser represented to us that he (she) was a
non-US person as defined in Regulation S.  We did not engage in a
distribution of this offering in the United States.  Each purchaser
represented his (her) intention to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with a view toward distribution. The shares
issued constituted restricted securities under the United States
Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") and were issued pursuant to
an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act.
None of the securities issued were registered.

On July 28, 2000, we completed an offering of 2,000,000 shares of
our Common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to a total of one
director. The total amount we received form this offering was
$2,000.  We completed the offering pursuant to Regulation S of the
Securities Act. The director represented to us that he was a non-US
person as defined in Regulation S.  We did not engage in a
distribution of this offering in the United States.  The director
represented his intention to acquire the securities for investment
only and not with a view toward distribution.  The shares issued
constituted restricted securities under the United States Securities
Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") and were issued pursuant to an
exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. None
of the securities issued were registered.

ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this annual report for the year ended September 30,
2003. This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements
and the Company's future operating results could differ materially
from those discussed herein. Certain statements contained in this
Report, including, without limitation, statements containing the
words "believes," "anticipates," "expects" and the like, constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors which may cause the actual results, performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such
factors or to announce publicly the results of any revisions of the
forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference
herein to reflect future events or developments.

STATUS OF OPERATIONS

During the period up to September 30, 2003, the Company was
primarily engaged in the execution of the share exchange with the
Safe Cell Tab business. This exchange was effectuated on August 22,
2003.  Since this time, the Company devoted efforts to establish a
new business. Numerous organizational and re-structuring activities
have occurred along with a significant shift in the company's current
business focus.

For at least the first two quarters of the current fiscal 2004 year,
the Company anticipates incurring further losses as a result of
organizational expenses associated with setting up a company
structure which is capable of implementing its new business plan
which amongst other things, includes the completion of the share
exchange agreement and the operating and managing of the SCT.  The
Company anticipates that until these procedures are completed, it will
not generate revenues, and may continue to operate at a loss thereafter,
depending upon the performance of the business.

Subsequent to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003, the Company
entered into material business arrangements in an attempt to further
promote its newly acquired business combinations and activities. If
the Company either raises additional capital or engages in a business
combination transaction that implicitly increases the value of the
Company, shareholders may not personally recognize the increase in
value. For example, if the Company raises additional capital in the
future at $0.03 per share, even if there is a market for the Company's
stock, it may not support enough volume to permit a shareholder to
liquidate shares at a profit. Similarly, a business combination
transaction could result in any consideration being paid either to
the Company or a significant shareholder such as Dan Steer, and
minority shareholders would simply continue to own shares in the
resulting business.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company remains in the development stage and since inception,
has experienced no significant change in liquidity or capital
resources or shareholders' equity. Up until September 30, 2003 the
company had not managed to generate any additional revenues or
funding.  The Company estimates that it will need additional capital
investment through private placement funding of approximately
$500,000 in order to generate positive cash flow from its operations
and to carry out its business plan. As of September 30, the company
has not secured any of these additional funds. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that any additional funds will be available on
terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

If Claremont was able to raise the additional funding of $500,000 in
private placement transactions over the next twelve months to cover
its minimum cash requirements to persons who are "accredited
investors", it would be allocated as follows:

$ 300,000 to engage further managers and staff in the sales,
          marketing and investor relations departments of our US
          offices;
$  50,000 for outsourced advertising, graphic artwork and printing
          of marketing materials;
$  75,000 for operational infrastructure costs including rent,
          communications, consumable supplies and travel;
$  75,000 to acquire additional product inventory.

In the process of carrying out its business plan, the Company may
determine that it cannot raise sufficient capital to support any of
its business divisions on acceptable terms, or at all. The Company's
board of directors has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests
of the corporation and its shareholders. The board of directors may
decide that it is in the best interests of the corporation and its
shareholders to liquidate the business, enter into a new line of
business or engage in a business combination with another business.

Other than those rights and assets which may enured to the Company as
a result of the share exchange agreement with Safe Cell Tab, Inc. on
August 22, 2003, the Company was not party to any contracts, letters
of intent, commitments or agreements and is not currently engaged in
active negotiations with respect to any acquisitions other than
those which have been otherwise described on its current websites.
Although the Company does not presently intend to enter into a new
line of business or business combination other than those which will
occur as a result of the SCT share exchange, it reserves the right to
change its mind in an attempt to either complement or accentuate its
current business initiatives.

The Company's financial statements are presented on a going concern
basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  At
September 30, 2003 we have been unsuccessful in our efforts to raise
additional capital to meet our plan of operations. Our cash position
as of September 30, 2003 was $1,850.  Since inception, we have
recognized no revenue.  We have accumulated operating losses of
$187,208  and we have a working capital deficiency of $135,208.  At
the present time, and over the next twelve months, our primary focus
will be to develop our new initiatives and operational plan, to
establish sales and to explore various methods for raising
additional funds.

We are presently in the development and promotional stages of our
business and we can provide no assurance that we will be successful
with our efforts to establish any revenue.  All required
administrative expenses are currently being paid by directors of the
Company subject to reimbursement. In order to pursue our existing
operational plan, we are dependent upon the continuing financial
support of creditors and stockholders until such time when we are
successful in raising equity capital to finance the operations and
capital requirements of the Company or until such time that we can
generate our own revenue from our various divisions.

RISK FACTORS

Dependence upon external financing

It is imperative that we raise additional capital to complete our
operational plan to promote and commercialize our newly acquired
business combinations and activities. We will also require funds to
sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning
revenues from our various divisions. We estimate that we would
require additional funding of $500,000 to pursue our business
strategy. If we are unable to obtain equity financing upon terms
that our management deems sufficiently favourable, or at all, it
would have a material adverse impact upon our ability to expand our
current operational plan. Any sale of share capital will result in
dilution to existing shareholders.

Dependence on key management

Our success is highly dependent upon the continued services of Mr.
Dan Steer, our Chief Executive Officer. If Mr. Steer were to leave us,
it could have a materially adverse effect upon our business and
operations.  We anticipate entering into employment contract with
Mr. Steer but can provide no assurance that we will come to terms
for such employment agreements.

Dependence on market penetration of our products

Our internal market analysis has determined that there is a market
for our products within the electronics industry and related
cellular phone industry.  These markets are defined by a specific
customer demographic. If the Company's market analysis proves to be
incorrect and or inaccurate, this could have an adverse effect on
the Company's ability to successfully commercialize on its various
products and achieves its anticipated profitability. If we are
unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most
likely fail.

We are in our early stages of development and face a risk of
business failure

We are in our early stages of development and have just engaged a
few companies to market, sell and distribute our products. We have
no way to evaluate the likelihood that we will be able to operate
the business successfully.  The likelihood of success must be
considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, and
complications and delays encountered in connection with the
technology industry. We recognize that if we are unable to generate
significant revenues from our various divisions, we will not be able
to earn profits or continue operations. There is no history upon
which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove
successful, and we can provide investors with no assurance that we
will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable
operations. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our
business will most likely fail.

We may not be able to sell our products

In the event that our products are successful, we may be unable to
sell our products.  There can be no assurance that we will be able
to sell our products at all, or enough at prices to maintain
operations.

We may suffer product liability from manufacturing defects

In the event that our products are successful, we may suffer
substantial product liability from mass manufacturing due to
defects. There can be no assurance that all products will function
properly. We do not currently maintain insurance for our products
and product liability resulting from manufacturing defects. Our
manufacturers agreed to replace all defective products at their
expense.

If there is a market for our common stock, our stock price may be
volatile

If there's a market for our common stock, we anticipate that the
market price of our common stock will be subject to wide
fluctuations in response to several factors, including:

1)   actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
2)   our ability or inability to generate new revenues;
3)   increased competition; and
4)   conditions and trends in the technology industry.

Further, because our common stock is traded on the NASD over-the-
counters bulletin board, our stock price may be impacted by factors
that are unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance.
These market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political
and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rates or
international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.

Our shares constitute as penny stock

The shares of our common stock constitute penny stock under the
Securities and Exchange Act.  The shares will remain penny stock for
the foreseeable future. The classification of penny stock makes it
more difficult for a broker-dealer to sell the stock into a
secondary market, which makes it more difficult for a purchaser to
liquidate his or her investment. Any broker-dealer engaged by the
purchaser for the purpose of selling his or her shares in Claremont
Technologies Corp will be subject to rules 15g-1 through 15g-10 of
the Securities and Exchange Act. Rather than creating a need to
comply with those rules, some broker-dealers will refuse to attempt
to sell penny stock.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are
prepared in accordance with the United States generally accepted
accounting principles. The audited financials statements ended
September 30, 2003, the independent auditor's report, and the notes
to the financial statements are attached as Exhibit 13 with this
filing.


Index to Financial Statements:

1.     Independent Auditors' Report;

2.     Audited Financial Statements

a.   Balance Sheets as at September 30, 2003 and 2002;
b.   Statements of Changes in Capital Deficit for the
     period from September 14, 1999 (inception) to September 30,
     2003;
c.   Statements of Operations for the years ended
     September 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the cumulative period from
     September 14, 1999 (inception)to  September 30, 2003
d.   Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
     September 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the cumulative period from
     September 14, 1999 (inception) to September 30, 2003;
e.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
f.   Notes to Financial Statements.


ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
         AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

ITEM 8A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our chief
executive officer and our principal financial officer, after
evaluating the effectiveness of the Company's "disclosure controls
and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"), has concluded that
as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures
were adequate and designed to ensure that material information
relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known
to him by others within those entities.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were
no significant changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.

PART III

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
         PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Board of Director Members:

As of September 30, 2003 the Company's Board of Directors was
comprised of the following five (5) board members:

Mr. Daniel J Steer - Chairman
Mr. John Morita - Director -  Resigned December 01, 2003
Dr. Andrew J.M. Willoughby - Resigned January 31, 2004
Dr. Graham M. Willoughby - Resigned December 01, 2003
Mr. Donald G. Walker - Resigned December 01, 2003

On January 31, 2004, Dr. Andrew Willoughby resigned his position
as Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. As
of February 3, 2004 the Company currently has two directors.

On December 01, 2003 Mr. John Morita resigned his position as
Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Mr. Donald
Walker and Dr. Graham Willoughby resigned as Directors of the Company
on December 01, 2003.

On August 22, 2003, and as a condition to the execution of
Claremont's share exchange agreement with Safe Cell Tab Inc., Mr.
Brian Kejser submitted his resignation as Claremont's Secretary,
Treasurer and director and Mr. Dan Steer joined Mr. John Morita as
Claremont's second board member. The Company's new board of
directors then passed the following board resolutions:

i) appointment of Dan Steer as Claremont's new Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief Executive Officer and appointment of John Morita as the
Chief Financial Officer;

ii) to increase the number of Board member seats from two to
five and the appointment of Dr. Graham Willoughby, Dr. Andrew
Willoughby and Mr. Don Walker as the three additional Board of
Director members of Claremont;

iii) Dr. Andrew Willoughby was then further appointed as President
and Chief Operating Officer of Claremont Technologies.

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of
the current directors and executive officers of Claremont at January
27, 2004:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                     Age  Position
--------------------------------------------------------------------

                      <c>  <c>
Mr. Daniel J. Steer 	  70   Chief Executive Officer, Chairman

</table>

Mr. Daniel J. Steer - Chairman & CEO.   Over the past forty years,
Mr. Steer has been actively involved in almost every aspect of the
sales and marketing business - as a result of which, Mr. Steer has
created and managed literally dozens of sales and marketing programs for
companies ranging in size from  small enterprising private businesses to
much larger multinational conglomerates.  Mr. Steer started his career
in the Wholesale Lumber business, working very quickly up to National
Sales Manager (1954) for one of the largest lumber wholesalers in the
Pacific Northwest and then moved up to become General Manager of the
third largest wholesaler in North America. As a relentless entrepreneur,
Mr. Steer has created, founded, developed, managed and funded many, many
companies, spanning a wide range of industries that include mining,
lumber, high tech wireless communications, on-line debit card programs,
healthcare and sports related operations.  In 1989 Mr. Steer formed D J
Modern Mill Consultants, Inc. which to this very day still provides a
wide range of Consulting & Financing services to the secondary lumber
and mining industry.  From 1991 to 2002 Mr. Steer raised over Four (4)
Million USD for various projects and clients. As Founder of Safe Cell
Tab Inc., and now Chairman and CEO of Claremont, Mr. Steer clearly
understands just how critically important a strong management team is to
the overall success of any business initiative.  It is for this reason
that Mr. Steer has made a career out of surrounding himself with
dedicated professionals who have the requisite expertise.

TERM OF OFFICE

Our officers are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the
next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from
office in accordance with our bylaws.  Our officers are appointed by our
board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

SECTION  16(a)  BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

As of September 30, 2003 there were no officers or directors of the
company which had failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified
reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most
recent fiscal  year:
<table>
<caption>

                            Number   Transactions   Known Failures
                            Of late   Not Timely      To File a
Name and principal position Reports    Reported     Required Form
--------------------------  -------  -------------- -------------

                         <c>      <c>            <c>
Daniel Steer
Chairman                     0             0               0
& CEO

Dr. Andrew Willoughby*       0             0               0
President and COO
Director

Dr. Graham Willoughby*       0             0               0
Director

Donald Walker *
Exec.VP Sales                0             0               0
and Licensing
Director

John Morita*
CFO                          0             0               0
Director

</table>

* John Morita resigned as Director and CFO effective December 1, 2003
and Donald Walker and Graham Willoughby resigned as Directors effective
December 01, 2003.  Andrew Willoughby resigned as Director, President
and Chief Operating Officer effective January 31, 2004.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by,
or paid to our executive officers by any person for all services
rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2003.  No officers or directors received annual compensation in
excess of $100,000 during the last two complete fiscal years.

               Fiscal Year 2003 Officers Annual Compensation Table
<table>
<caption>
                           Annual  Compensation         Long  Term  Compensation
                           --------------------         ------------------------
                                                Other
All
                                                Annual
Other
                                                Compen  Restricted
Com-
                                                sation  Stock    Options/  LTIP
pen-
Name            Title     Year  Salary   Bonus  (stock) Awarded  SARs (#)  payouts ($)
sation
------------  ----------  ----  -------  -----  ------  -------  --------  ----------- ------
<S>          <C>          <C>  <C>         <C>    <C>    <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>

Daniel       Chairman,    2003  $0 (1)      0      0      0        0            0      0
J. Steer     CEO

Dr. Andrew   President
Willoughby   & COO
	     Director     2003  $0 (2)      0      0      0        0            0      0

John         CFO          2003  $12,000 (3) 0      0      0        0            0      0
Morita       Director

Donald       Director,    2003  $0 (5)      0      0       0       0            0      0
Walker       VP Channel
             Market &
             Licensing

Graham       Director     2003  $0          0      0       0       0            0      0
Willoughby

</table>

(1) During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, Mr. Daniel Steer
received $3,500 cash remuneration from Claremont's wholly owned
subsidiary Safe Cell Tab, Inc., which was paid to Mr. Steer's company -
DJ Modern Mill Consultants, Inc.

(2) During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, Dr. Andrew
Willoughby received $4,500 cash remuneration from Claremont's wholly
owned subsidiary Safe Cell Tab, Inc.

(3) Mr. Morita was the Company's former president and chief executive
officer.  Mr. Morita has not received any of this $12,000 shown as a
salary. This amount has been deferred due to the financial constraints
of the Company.

Note:  Due to the financial constraints of the company none of the
officers or directors received any form salary during the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2003, except as noted on (1),(2) and (3)

Employment/Consulting agreements

We do not have an employment or consultant agreement with Mr. Dan
Steer, our Chief executive officer and a director.  Mr. Steer
provides his services to us on a part-time basis.  Effective October
1, 2003, the Company began paying Mr. Steer a management fee in the
amount of $1,000 per month.   Due to the Company's financial
condition, Mr. Steer's management fees have not been paid and
instead have been accrued as an expense.

We have an executive consulting agreement with Mr. John Morita,
former president of the Company and former chief financial officer
and director of the Company. The Company began paying Mr. Morita an
executive consulting fee in the amount of $1,000 per month since the
inception of the Company.  Due to the Company's financial condition,
Mr. Morita's fees have not been paid and instead have been accrued
as an expense. As of September 30, 2003, the Company owes Mr. Morita
$19,800. Mr. Morita recently tendered his resignation.

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension,
retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers,
except that our directors and executive officers may receive stock
options at the discretion of our board of directors.  We do not have
any material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or
non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or
executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at
the discretion of our board of directors.

Committees of the Board

We do not have an audit or compensation committee at this time.

Director Compensation

We do not have a compensation committee.  We may reimburse our
directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board
meetings but did not pay director's fees or other cash compensation
for services rendered as a director in the year ended September 30,
2003.

We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their
service in their capacity as directors.  The board of directors may
award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special
services on behalf of our company other than services ordinarily
required of a director.  No director received and/or accrued any
compensation for his or her services as a director, including
committee participation and or past assignments.

The Company did not adopt any compensation committee or compensation
policies. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
Other than as detailed above, the Company has no stock option,
retirement, incentive, defined benefit, actuarial, pension or
profit-sharing programs for the benefit of directors, officers or
other employees, but the Board of Directors may recommend adoption
of one or more such programs in the future.

ITEM 11. SECURTIY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
         MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2003, Claremont's
outstanding common stock owned of record or beneficially by each
executive officer and director and by each person who owned of
record, or was known by the Company to own beneficially, more than 5%
of its common stock, and the shareholdings of all Executive Officers
and Directors as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment
power with respect to the shares shown.

As of September 30, 2003 the total number of issued and outstanding
common shares in the Company was 16,320,000.  5% of which equals
816,000 shares. As at February 2, 2004, the total number of issued
common shares in the Company was 24,800,000 of which 16,320,000 are
outstanding. The common shares of 8,480,000 in connection to the SCT
share exchange agreement has not been released. Below represent the
share positions of all officers and directors of the Company as of
February 2, 2004 in anticipation of the completion of the SCT share
exchange agreement:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

CURRENT  OFFICERS  AND  DIRECTORS

                <c>                               <c>                 <c>
Common Stock       Dan Steer   (1)                           Nil shares    Nil%
                   Director, Secretary/Treasurer
		       Chief Executive Officer
                   1374 Cartier Place,
                   Vancouver, BC V6P 2W9

                                                         -------------    -------
                                                             Nil shares    Nil%
Total combined share position of all executive
Officers and directors as a group consists of two
(2) persons                                                  Nil shares    Nil%.

FORMER OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Common Stock       John Morita                          6,400,000 shares   25.81%
                   former Director and
                   former President and
                   former Chief Financial Officer
                   145, West 44th Avenue
                   Vancouver, BC  V5Y 2V3

Common Stock       Mr. Donald G Walker                       Nil shares    Nil%
		   former Director
                   133 Ward St
                   Larkspur, CA USA 94939

Common Stock	   Dr. Graham Willoughby   (2)	             Nil shares    Nil%
		   former Director
	           Suite 123, 8415 Granville St.
		   Vancouver, BC V6P 4Z9

Common Stock       Dr. Andrew Willoughby	             Nil shares    Nil%
                   former Director and
                   former President and
		   former Chief Operating Officer
                   Suite 123, 8415 Granville St.
		   Vancouver, BC V6P 4Z9

Common Stock       Brian Kejser                              Nil  Shares    Nil%
                   former Director and
                   former Secretary and
                   former Treasurer
                   1818 Draycott Road
                   North Vancouver, BC V7J 1V3

 5%  STOCKHOLDERS

Common Stock       DJ Modern Mill Consultants Inc.   1,973,000 Shares (1)   7.9%
                   1374 Cartier Place,
                   Vancouver, BC V6P 2W9
</table>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(1)	DJ Modern Mill Consultants Inc. is owned and operated by Mr.
Dan Steer, President, whom is the sole controlling shareholder of DJ
Modern Mill Consultants Inc.  DJ Modern Mill Consultants Inc., holds
a 7.9% interest of Common stock in Claremont Technologies.

(2) Dr. Graham Willoughby is the beneficial owner of 212,625 shares
of the company's common stock because of his 43.75% equity ownership
in CIBRON Corporation which became a shareholder of the company's
stock as a result of the share exchange with Safe Cell Tab, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Except as otherwise noted, it is believed by us that all persons
have full voting and investment power with respect to the shares
indicated. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a
"beneficial owner" of a security if he or she, directly or
indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting
of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the
disposition of such security.  Accordingly, more than one person may
be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security.  A person
is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security, which that
person has the right to acquire within 60 days, such as options or
warrants to purchase the common stock of Claremont.  There were no
rights outstanding as of February 2, 2004 entitling owners to
acquire our common stock within 60 days.

Mr. John Morita entered into an agreement with a current and several
past members of the board of directors of the Company to sell
6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. Certain conditions
were not met and the agreement has not been completed at this time.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

No director, executive officer or nominee for election as a director
of the Company and no owner of five percent or more of Claremont's
outstanding shares or any member of their immediate family has
entered into or proposed any transaction in which the amount involved
exceeds $60,000 except as noted above.

In October 2003, the Company secured financing in the amount of
$60,000, from a third party to be advanced to the Company as an
unsecured demand loan.  The advances will bear interest at the rate
of 12% and interest will be payable annually.  There is no repayment
schedule at this time.

In August 2003, the Company secured financing in the amount of
$72,000 from a third party to be advanced to the Company as an
unsecured demand loan.  The advances will bear interest at the rate
of 12% and interest will be payable annually. There is no repayment
schedule at this time.

The services of John Morita were provided to us pursuant to an
executive consulting agreement between Mr. Morita and the Company.
We paid Mr. Morita a consulting fee of $1,000 per month in
consideration for his providing management and administration
services to us.  The management agreement was for a term commencing
September 14, 1999 and it expired November 30, 2003 when Mr. Morita
tendered his resignation.

Mr. Morita advanced to the Company the amount of $56,000 as a
shareholder's loan during the year ended September 30, 2003.  The
loan was unsecured and did not have any fixed terms of repayment.

ITEM 13.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)     Exhibits  and  Index  of  Exhibits

<table>
  Exhibit
  Number                         Description of Exhibit
--------------     -------------------------------------------------

                <c>
 10.1                Share Exchange Agreement between the Company and
                     the Safe Cell Tab, Inc. (1)
 13.1                Audited Financials Statements for the year ended
                     September 30, 2003 (2)
 31.1                Certification 302, CEO (2)
 32.1                Certification 906, CEO (2)
 --------------     -------------------------------------------------
</table>
(1)     Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
 as an exhibit to the Form 8-K dated September 4 and December 4, 2003.
(2)     Attached as exhibit to the current Form 10-KSB


(b)     Reports  on  Form  8-K.

On August 6, 2003, we reported with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission that the Company effected a forward split of 3.2 shares
for 1 split of its common stock.  The stock split was effected by
way of a stock dividend to the Company's shareholders of record on
July 28, 2003.  Each shareholder of record was issued 2.2 additional
shares of the Company's common stock for each 1 share held on the
payment date of July 28, 2003.

On September 4 and December 4, 2003, we reported with the US
Securities and Exchange Commission that we had entered into a Share
Exchange Agreement between the shareholders of the Safe Cell Tab,
Inc. and the Company.  The subsequent filing reported the audited
financial information of the Safe Cell Tab, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary.  The Safe Cell Tab, Inc. provided an audited financials
as well as a proforma unaudited financials as of September 30, 2002,
as if the transaction was completed and all obligations had been
assumed as of September 30, 2002.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees billed for each of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002 for professional services rendered by the
principal accountant for the audit of Claremont's annual financial
statements and review of the financial statements included in the
registrant's Form 10-QSB or services that are normally provided by
the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements for those fiscal years were estimated at $5,000 and
$4,200 respectively.

AUDIT RELATED FEES

None

TAX FEES

None

ALL OTHER FEES

None


<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES



In  accordance  with  Section  13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


CLAREMONT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.


By:  /s/  Dan Steer
     ___________________________________
     Dan Steer, Chief Executive Officer and Director
     Date:     February 3, 2004


In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


By:  /s/ DAN STEER
     ___________________________________
     DAN STEER, Principal Executive Officer
     Principal Accounting Officer, director


     Date:     February 3, 2004