alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014292EN.01000301.xml

| 8.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 292/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 292/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1052/2014

of 2 October 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Jambon de Vendée (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Jambon de Vendée’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Jambon de Vendée’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jambon de Vendée’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Jambon de Vendée’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Jambon de Vendée’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 153, 21.5.2014, p. 14.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
No. 91-5835.

#### Reidt *v.*Department of Veterans Affairs,

*ante,*p. 948. Petition for rehearing denied.
Ex. 99.3

                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with the annual report of Stelmar Shipping Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.



/s/ Peter Goodfellow
--------------------
Peter Goodfellow

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer






02509.0004 #409589
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Workshop on Future Reactors, June 4 - 5, 2001 (NUREG/CP-0175)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0175            - Cover – Page 133 (PDF 3.3 MB)
          - Page 135 – Page 316 (PDF 3.3 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2001**Date Published:**December 2001

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains the information presented at the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Workshop on Future Reactors held at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, on June 4-5, 2001. Included are the subject matter summaries, followed by the presentation material and selected participants discussions.

The primary purpose of the workshop was to identify the regulatory challenges associated with future reactor designs. A list of such challenges was developed from the workshop notes, the various presentations, the panel discussions and the question and answer sessions. This list is included in the Introduction section of this document.

The titles of the papers and the names of the authors have been updated and may differ from those that appeared in the final workshop agenda.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 91-6317.

#### King *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.19
 Administrative Office2929 W. Main St., Suite G. Visalia, CA 93291P.O. Box 631, Visalia, CA 93279559.627.5050 FAX: 559.627.4728Farm Credit West
    
    Web: www.farmereditwest.com
  
   TERM REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT 
SECTION 16 Negative Covenants (A) Borrowings (iv).
 TERM REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT 
SECTION 17 Financial Covenants (B) Tangible Net Worth.
 TERM REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT 
SECTION 17 Financial Covenants (C) EBITDA.
  
 Farm Credit West, FLCAFarm Credit West, PCASubsidiaries of Farm Credit West, ACA
    
    The Farm Credit System
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analyses of KS Test Data on the Heated Rod Bundle Temperature Behavior in RBMK-1500 Core Model Under Stop and Recovery Flow Using RELAP5/MOD3.2 and RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 GAMMA (NUREG/IA-0202)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0202 (PDF 3.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 2001

**Prepared by:** V.A. Vinogradov, A.Y. Balykin Nuclear Reactor Institute, Russian Research Center Kurchatov Institute Kurchatov Square 1 123182, Moscow Russia

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report has been prepared as a part of the Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program.

KS experimental data on the behavior of the heated rod bundle temperature in the RBMK-1500 core model under stop and recovery flow conditions were simulated with RELAP5/MOD3.2 and RELAP5/MOD3.2.2GAMMA to assess the codes suitability. Especially calculations were performed to estimate differences in the code version predictions for processes/phenomena, which could occur under specific conditions of RBMK type reactor during LOCA with MCP's pressure header rupture and subsequent ECCS water injection.

This problem addresses phenomena of high importance to RBMK-1500 safety including water discharge, critical heat flux, post dryout heat transfer, reflood and propagation of rewetting front in the fuel channel during an accident.

The test have been carried out at KS semi-integral test facility (Russian Research Center Kurchatov Institute) represented RBMK primary circuit. The main purpose of the experiment was investigation of temperature conditions in the fuel assembly under high power value, inlet flow rate being decreased drastically up to complete stop of the flow followed by pressure header rupture. A subsequent flow rate resumption was also assumed, the fuel assembly power high level being unchanged.

First a study of the effect of the hydraulic nodalization to the code calculations was performed using different number of hydraulic volumes for the fuel channel model. After the choice of proper nodalization and maximum user-specified time step, base case calculations were done for the test.

Sensitivity studies were carried out to investigate the effects of modeling on the behavior of the rod simulator temperatures along the height of the fuel assembly model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 — Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 54)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 54, Final Report (PDF - 36.67 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2015**Date Published:** July 2015

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) has been prepared in response to an application submitted by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon), to renew the operating license for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 (Byron), for an additional 20 years.

This SEIS includes the analysis that evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action. Alternatives considered include: new nuclear generation, coal-integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC), combination (NGCC, wind, and solar generation), replacement power, and no renewal of the license (the no-action alternative).

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff’s recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for Byron are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. This recommendation is based on the following:
        - the analysis and findings in NUREG–1437, Volumes 1 and 2,  Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants ;
        - the Environmental Report submitted by Exelon;
        - consultation with Federal, state, local, and tribal government agencies;
        - the NRC's environmental review; and
        - consideration of public comments received during the scoping process and received on the draft SEIS.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Development of a Vandellòs II NPP Model using the TRACE Code:Application to an Actual Transient of Main Coolant Pumps Trip and Start-up (NUREG/IA-0243)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0243 (PDF - 1.32 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2009**Date Published:** February 2011

**Prepared by:** O. Lozano, C-P. Chiang, C. Llopis, L. Batet, F. Reventόs

Department of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Technical University of Catalonia ETSEIB, Av. Diagonal 647, Pav. C 08028 Barcelona Spain

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the International Code Assessment and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Thermal-Hydraulics Studies Group (GET) of the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) has developed a model of Vandellòs II NPP (CNV II) for TRACE using as a previous RELAP5 model of the plant. The model simulates the components of the primary and secondary circuits, along with the main heat structures (nuclear fuel, SG tubes and pressurizer heaters). Passive heat structures and neutron kinetics are not simulated in the model. The model includes some of the plant control systems.

The main predicted steady state nominal parameters successfully match plant and design values. A real loss of off-site power with the subsequent Reactor Coolant Pumps start-up sequence (occurred in August 24th of 1993) has been simulated. The asymmetric behaviour of the flows in the vessel has been useful in qualifying the 3D capabilities of the TRACE VESSEL component.

Mass flows of primary loops are among the most important parameters in the analyzed transient. The simulation results are very similar to the data recorded at the plant. The similarity of calculated and measured values is a guarantee of the validity of the model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Materials Behavior in HTGR Environments (NUREG/CR-6824, ANL-02/37)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6824 (PDF - 4.59 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**February 2003**Date Published:**July 2003

**Prepared by:** K. Natesan, A. Purohit, S.W. Tam Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

C.A. Greene, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6537 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The report reviews and evaluates data currently available on materials performance and long-term behavior in High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGRs), including the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) and the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR). As part of the evaluation, the report identifies the materials that have been used in HTGRs, their functions, and the environmental conditions under which they need to perform adequately. The report identifies the materials used for structural applications (such as pressure vessel and reactor primary circuit components, including internals) and for the power conversion system, with emphasis on gas-turbine-based HTGRs. The report examines the chemistry of the primary-circuit helium environment from the standpoint of type and concentration of impurities. A framework is presented for analyzing gas-solid interactions in single and bioxidant conditions, and the data on materials scaling behavior are compared from several research programs. This report discusses the available data on the mechanical properties (such as creep, fatigue, creep fatigue, and crack growth) of candidate materials in a helium environment. Available information on the carburization, decarburization, oxidation, and aging of structural materials and their effects on mechanical properties is summarized. From the materials standpoint, the report also discusses the role of particulate-laden gases in corrosion-erosion and the possible effects on materials from off-normal situations in the operation of the reactors. The report makes several recommendations to supplement the data on environmental effects on materials, on mechanical properties of structural and power conversion materials, and on alternative candidate alloys for application in HTGRs.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Welch Allyn, Inc., Respondent, v Vail Tool Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[631 NYS2d 972]

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly permitted the application of defendants’ attorney to withdraw to be made by cross motion rather than by order to show cause. Defendants’ and plaintiff’s counsel were aware of the application *(see,*CPLR 321 [b] [2]), were present during oral *825argument and did not object to the relief sought *(see, Piercy v Piercy,*97 AD2d 972). Because defendants’ attorneys demonstrated sufficient cause, the court properly granted that application *(see, Solomon v Solomon,*172 AD2d 1081).

The court erred, however, in simultaneously granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment rather than ordering a 30-day stay to enable defendants to obtain new counsel to oppose plaintiffs motion on the merits *(see,*CPLR 321 [c]). Defendants’ counsel affirmed that defendants had a meritorious defense. The 45-day stay of future proceedings granted by the court was of limited usefulness because the court had already determined plaintiffs motion with respect to liability; all that was left was an inquest on damages at which defendants were precluded from presenting evidence of any records relative to cost other than invoices previously produced pursuant to court order.

We vacate the award of dispositive relief to plaintiff contained in paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9 of the order without prejudice to renewal of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and other relief after the expiration of the statutory 30-day stay. In view of our determination, we have not considered the merits of plaintiffs motion. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
#### Jane Pedreira, Appellant, v Jorge Pedreira, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 851]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered July 2, 2002, unanimously dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as subsumed in the pending appeal from the final judgment of divorce, entered on or about December 10, 2003 *(see*M-241 decided simultaneously herewith). No opinion. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

FORM 10-QSB


Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996      

Commission File Number   33-98694-NY                                

                  BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.                 
(Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

  Nevada                                 
11-3276768                                        
(State or Other Jurisdiction of         (IRS Employer        Incorporation or 
Organization)         Identification No.)


       63 Wall Street, Suite 1801, New York, NY  10005       
     (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                       (212) 344-1600                        
     (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

                                                                  
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed
     Since Last Report)

     Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by 
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for 
such 
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and 
(2) 
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x     No      

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, as of June 30, 
1996 was: 16,500 

The purpose of this Amendment is to add a Financial Data 
Schedule.<PAGE>BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
June 30, 1996






INDEX


Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
               Financial Data Schedule
<PAGE> Item 6. Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule
<PAGE>


SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


               BUTTERFLY TECHNOLOGY, INC.


              By: Oleg Lagutenko                            
          
               Oleg Lagutenko, President
               



Dated: 2/27/97     Oleg Lagutenko                                 

               Oleg Lagutenko, President, Director


Dated: 2/27/97     Melvyn S. Aronoff                                
               Melvyn S. Aronoff, Secretary, Director
#### James Conner *v.*Gwin’s Ex's. A case in Equity.

A negro, whose life was forfeited to the public for murder, was sold „ under execution, without that fact being then known. A bill in liquify by the purchaser praying to stand, in the place of the judgment'credilors, for the amount of the purchase money was sustained by the Court.

The bill stated, that two executions being writs of *fi. fa.*issued from the County Courts of Mecklenburg• and Iredell, at the instance of different Plaintiffs, and were levied by the Sheriff' on the property of the testator in his lifetime, and particularly on a negro fellow named -1 and that the property was advertised for sale— that before the day of sale, this negro privately murdered the testator, and that on the. day of sale the perpetrator of the murder had not been discovered. That this negro was sold on that day, and purchased by the Plaintiff for a sum of money amounting to the judgments, which he paid in discharge of them. That afterwards it was discovered this negro had committed the murder, whereupon he was tried, condemned and executed} ami the bill prayed that as the life of the negro was in fact forfeited to the public, at and. before the day of sale ; and that as an action at. law could not be supported by the Plaintiff against the executors, that this Court would decree him to stand in the place of the judgment creditors, and to be considered in the light of purchaser of “the benefit of their judgments, so as to have the estate of the testator, as to the amount thereof, subject, in the same. manner it was at the time when the money was advanced by him. The Defendants demuned to this bill for want of equity, but agreed that if the opinion of the Court should be against them on this point, they would *141not further contend against the Plaintiff, as the stated in the bill were true, but would submit to such decree as the Court thought proper to make.

And now this cause came on to be tried, and the demurrer being argued :

*Per*curiam,

Judge Ashe and Judge Wíimams,

we are clearly of opinion that the facts stated are proper for the jurisdiction of this Court,/and if true, that the Plaintiff is entitled to relief agreeably to the prayer of this. bill. Whereupon a decree was entered accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DANNY D. DANIELS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 70 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21st day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File a Petition** 

**for Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**