Lexter Kennon Kossie#700661

William McConnell Unit

3001 South Emily Drive

Beeville, Texas 78102

February 27, 2015

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. BOX 12308, Capital Station

Austin, Texas 78711

lo,9i$-3&

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MR 04 2015

RE: FILING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ACCOMPANYING WRIT

OF MANDAMUS

Dear Clerk:

Please find enclosed for filing and bringing to

the Court's attention the original Motion For Leave To

File Accompanying Original Petition For Writ of Mandamus

as soon as your time will permit.

Thank you.

cc: File

cc: 14th Court of Appeals,Respondent

Sincerely,

Lext'er Kennon Kossie

Pro se Movant/Relator
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

LEXTER KENNON KOSSIE, Relator,

CASE NO.14-94-01171-CR

THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS,

Respondent.;

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ACCOMPANYING ORIGINAL

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITH THIS COURT

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Comes now, LEXTER KENNON KOSSIE, relator, pro se,

herein, and files this petition under the authority of Tex.

Const, art.; I, §§ 13 and 27 requesting this Court to issue

a writ of mandamus against respondent compelling respondent

to rule on relator's Motion To Recall Mandate and will show

unto the Court the following:

I.

This Court have authority to issue writs of mandamus

in criminal law matters pursuant to Tex. Const, art. V, § 5

and Tex. Code Crim. Proc.art. 4.04, § 1.

II.

Relator, LEXTER KENNON KOSSIE, is a prisoner of the

State of Texas in the custody of the Texas Department of Crim

inal Justice Correctional Institutions Division. Relator is

currently confined at the William McConnell Unit addressed:

3001 South Emily Drive; Beeville, Texas 78102.

Respondent, THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, is the

court of appeals whereas relator's direct appeal was filed.

The address of the principal office of respondent is : 301

Fannin, Suite; Houston, Texas 77002.
III.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The standard of this Court is to review whether

relator has demonstrated that the act sought to be compelled

is ministerial. See State ex rel. Healey v. McMeans, 884 S.jW.]

2d 772 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994), citing Braxton v. Dunn, 803 S.W.

2d 318, 320 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).

.IV-!

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On or about the 20th day of October, 2014, relator

file his Motion To Recall Mandate with the 14th court of

appeals in which the court has wholly refused to rule on said

motion. On or about the 9th day of February, 2015, relator

wrote the court inquiring about the status of said motion in

which the court has also refused to respond to.

V.

ARGUMENTS

Relator contends that the respondent is required to

rule on motions p resented to the court in a reasonable time.

When a motion is properly filed and pending before a court,

the act of giving consideration to and ruling upon that motion

is a ministerial act, and mandamus may issue to compel the

court to act. See In re Ramirez, 994 S.jW.j 2d 682, 683 (Tex.App.-

San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); see also Saftey-Kleen Corp

V. Garcia, 945 S.;W.2d 268, 269) Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, orig.

proceeding). If a motion has been properly filed and brought to

the attention of the court, this court may direct the court to

consider and rule upon the motion: however, this court may not

tell the court what ruling it should make. See Ramirez, 994

S.;W.;2d at 684. Relator contends that the act sought to be com

pelled is ministerial, as opposed to discretionary and relator

do not have an adequate remedy at law therefore he has met the

two prerequisites,that must be met before a writ of mandamus

will issue. See Ordunez v. Bean, 579 S.W.2d 911. 913 (Tex.Crim.

App. 1979).

(2)
WHEREFORE, PREMISES ARE CONSIDERED, Relator

prays this Court will grant him leave to file the accom

panying original petition for a writ of mandamus thereafter,

issue a writ of mandamus compelling respondent to rule on

relator's pending motion to recall mandate in re Cause No.

679887 and appeal case no. 14-94-01171-Cr.

INMATE'S DECLARATION

I, LEXTER KENNON KOSSIE#700661, being presently

incarcerated at the McConnell Unit in Beeville, Texas, de

clare pursuant to Tex. Civ.Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 132.001)a),

132.002, and 132.003 that, according to my belief, the

allegations made in this motion are true and correct.

SIGNED ON THISj^7_day of <JjM/ ' ,2015.

/S//

Lexter Kennon Kossie

Pro se Movant/Relator

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, LEXTER KENNON KOSSIE, do hereby certify that on

this the (X7 day ofjjW72015, a true and correct copy of

the above and foregoing motion was sent to respondent cia U.S.]

Postal Mail, postage prepaid, at THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF

APPEALS; .301 Fannin/Suite, 245; Houston, Texas 77002.

(3)

zsz(^^)Uh "M9^

Lexter Kennon Kossie

Pro se Movant/Relator