alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.28



[English Translation]



No. 0R 0058



Joint Engagement Letter



ULTIMA ELECTRONIC CORP. and ChinpMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (jointly as Engaging Parties) hereby engage SUN-FUND SECURITIES LTD. (the Engaged Party) to conduct an evaluation of Ultima (Jiangsu) Electronic Co. Ltd.



|I. |  | Evaluation Period shall start from the initiation of evaluation through the completion of the evaluation, and it can only be adjusted upon further communication and agreement by the
three parties.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|I |  | Payment Method:
|- |  | ---------------



| | A. |  | The Engaged Party shall specify in its Payment Notice the breakdown of the expenses.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. |  | Advanced payment: the Engaged Parties shall pay travel, postage and facsimile expenses in full amount as incurred.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. |  | Evaluation fee shall be divided between the Engaging Parties pursuant to their written agreement, and the Engaged Party shall invoice each Engaging Party accordingly.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|II |  | Miscellaneous
|-- |  | -------------



| | A. |  | If the Engaged Party cannot complete evaluation due to the Engaging Parties fault, notice shall be given to the Engaging Parties to terminate this engagement and Engaged Party
shall be entitled to its fees.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. |  | Each of the three copies of this Joint Engagement Letter is held by each of the Engaging Parties and the Engaged Party.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. |  | The Civil Law and relevant laws and regulations shall govern any issues that have not been specified in this Letter.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Engaging party: ULTIMA ELECTRONIC CORP.

Representative: Shanhsi Wang

Address: 6/F, No. 100 Lide Street, Chonghe

Tel: (02) 22256300

Unicode: 34589696



Engaging party: ChinpMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Representative: Hung-Chiu Hu

Address: 1, R & D Road 1, Hsinchu
Science-Based Industrial Park

Tel: (03) 577-0055

Unicode:
16130042



Trustee: SUN-FUND SECURITIES LTD.

Representative: Mali Hu Sun

Address: No. 14, 2/F, No. 508, Section 5,
Chonghsiao East Road, Taipei

Tel: (02) 23466277

Unicode:
70480565
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Experimental Results Pertaining to the Performance of Thermal Igniters (NUREG/CR-5079, SAND87-3139)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5079 (PDF - 2.59 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 1989**Date Published:**October 1989

**Prepared by:**Michael K. CarmelSandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, New Mexico 87185

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering and Systems TechnologyOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN A-1301

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes the results of various experimental programs regarding the performance of thermal igniters for the deliberate ignition of hydrogen in light water reactors. Experiments involving both premixed combustion and combustion with continuous hydrogen injection are reviewed. Combustion characteristics examined include flammability limits of hydrogen:air and hydrogen:air:steam mixtures, combustion pressure rises, combustion completeness, flame speeds, and heat transfer aspects. Comparisons of igniter type and igniter reliability under simulated reactor accident conditions are included. The results of the research programs provide a broad data base covering nearly all aspects of hydrogen combustion related to the performance of deliberate ignition systems.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Digital Systems Software Requirements Guidelines (NUREG/CR-6734)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6734            - Volume 1 - Guidelines (PDF 3.75 MB)
          - Volume 2 - Failure Descriptions (PDF 3.11 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2001**Date Published:** August 2001

**Prepared by:** M. Hecht, H. Hecht

SoHaR Incorporated 8421 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 201 Beverly Hills, CA 90211

R. Shaffer, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6231

Availability Notice

## Abstract

**Volume 1**

This document identifies guidelines that review high-integrity software requirements documents in nuclear power plants and addresses item 4 (Adequacy of System Functions and Commitments) of the seven review requirements for digital systems listed in NUREG-0800. The framework used for developing the guidelines was taken from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan, as well as Branch Technical Positions applicable to software-based digital systems. The topic areas include accuracy, functionality, reliability, robustness, maintainability, security, timing, and human-computer interaction. Checklists in accordance with IEEE Std 830 for use during software requirements reviews are also discussed.

**Volume 2**

This document provides descriptions of 45 failures that are linked to software requirements review guidelines listed in Volume I prepared under Contract NRC-00-037. The failure descriptions are "lessons learned" illustrating why specific software requirements guidelines are needed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# 0
U.S. Department of Transportation 

### Federal Aviation Adm ini stration Apr il 2 1 , 20 1 5 G.R. Lowe Ill 

### CEO Aviation Fabricators , ln c. 80 5 Nort h Fourth Street C linto n , MO 64735 D ear G.R. Lowe: Small Airplane Directorate 90 I L ocust Street Kansas City, Mis sour i 64 1 06

Th i s lette r i s to inform you that we ha ve received and begun pro cess ing your p e tition for exemption. It ac kn ow ledges receipt of the p e ti ti o n and describes how we will pr ocess it. 

### We Have the Petition We hav e rece ived your March 23,2015, p e tition o n behalf of Av iation Fabricators (AVFAB) for an exe mption from§ 23.56 1(a)(b)(c) of Title 14 , Code of F e deral R eg ul at ion s (14 CFR). This exemption, i f gran ted , would allow A VF AB to in s t a ll 

### PIN 62-0428 stretc h er assembly f o r a h orizo nt a l medical p asse nger wit h out dynamic seat testin g on Pilatus Mo de l s PC-12 , PC12/45 , P C- 1 2/4 7 , and PC-12/ 47£ airplanes. We hav e a dded your p e tition to the publi c docket (No. FAA- 2 015-0782) and we are proce ss in g it. We will contact yo u if we nee d additional inf o rmation

. 

### How We Will Process the Petition A p etition for an exemption , according to 

### § 11.63( d) , mu s t be se nt to the FAA at least 120 day s before th e propo se d e ffective d a te of the exemption. I n addit ion , we publish a summary of the petition in the Fed e ral Register for public comme nt unle ss, according to 

### § 11 .87 , we de termine that goo d cause exis t s f or not publi s hing it.We w ill a d v i se yo u of th e age n cy's fina l d ecis ion on your petition as soon as possib le. If yo u have any quest io n s in the meantime , you may contact Mr. Robert Stegeman at (816) 329-4 140. S i ncerely ,



# w~ Earl Lawre nce Manager , Small A i rp lane Directorate A ir c raft Ce rti ficat io n Se r vice 2
Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, B. John Lindeman, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2018 (the “report”) of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the “regirstrant”);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 

| . JK                      |                                            |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  April 1, 2019 | /s/  B. John Lindeman                 |
|                      | B. John Lindeman                                |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary |
|                      | (Principal Financial Officer)                   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: May 5, 2006
2 / 2 5 / 2 0 1 5 P r o d u c t i o n M e n u

h t t p : / / w o g c c

. s t a t e

. w y

. u s / g r o u p t r p M e n u

. c f m 1 / 1 

# W y o m i n g O i l a n d G a s

C o n s e r v a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n

D o w n l o a d P r o d u c t i o n

P r o d u c t i o n B y W e l l P r o d u c t i o n B y G r o u p N o

.

P r o d u c t i o n F r o m U p l o a d e d F i l e T r a c k P r o d u c t i o n B y W e l l

T w p & R g e ( D i s p l a y s P r o d u c t i o n ) S t a t e S t a t s a n d G r a p h s

D o w n l o a d b y C o u n t y a n d Y e a r ( *

. x l s )

N o W a r r a n t y i s m a d e b y t h e W

y o m i n g O i l a n d G a s C o n s e r v a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n f o r t h e

u s e o f t h i s d a t a

. A n y u s e o f t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n t o a n y s p e c i f i c a p p l i c a t i o n s h o u l d b e

b a s e d o n i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n a n d v e r i f i c a t i o n

. T h o s e m a k i n g u s e o f

, o r r e l y i n g

o n , t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a s s u m e a l l r i s k s a n d l i a b i l i t y a r i s i n g f r o m s u c h u s e o r r

e l i a n c e
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus OBED HOYTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-93-10) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Obed Hoyte, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In his informal brief, Hoyte states he filed an amendment to his § 2255 motion prior to the district court’s decision in this matter which was not considered by the district judge rendering the decision on the original § 2255 motion, but rather by a different judge who construed it as a new § 2255 motion and dismissed it as untimely. Because it is clear that the additional claims Hoyte sought to raise by way of amendment were, like the claims raised in the original motion, clearly barred by the one-year statute of limitations in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132 , § § 105, 110 Stat. 1214, 1220 (amending 28 U.S.C. § 2255), the fact the judge in this matter failed to consider those claims as part of this matter does not constitute error. 2 PER CURIAM: Obed Hoyte seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoyte , No. CR-93-10 (W.D. Va. May 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Plans and Schedules for Implementation of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Responsibilities under the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Amendments Act of 1985 (P.L. 99-240) (NUREG-1213, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1213, Revision 1 (PDF – 6.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 1987**Date Published:** August 1987

M. M. Dunkelman

Division of Low-Level Waste Management and DecommissioningOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The purpose of this document is to make available to the States and other interested parties, the plans and schedules for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) implementation of its responsibilities under Public Law 99-240, the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 (LLRWPAA). This document identifies the provisions of the LLRWPAA that affect the programs of the NRC, identifies what the NRC must do to fulfill each of its requirements under the LLRWPAA, and establishes schedules for carrying out I these requirements. Revision 1 of this document includes the accomplishments and schedule revisions made by NRC since July 1986.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Financial Officer

I, Calvin L. Kantonen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of First American Scientific Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: May 10, 2005 | /s/ Calvin L.  Kantonen                  
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                   | Calvin L. Kantonen                       
|                   | President and Principal Executive Officer



---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or ContractorsProceedings of the NRC/ASME Symposium on Valves, Pumps and Inservice Testing (NUREG/CP-0152)

# Proceedings of the Ninth NRC/ASME Symposium onValves, Pumps and Inservice Testing: Held at L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, Washington,DC, July 17–19, 2006 (NUREG/CP-0152, Volume 6)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0152, Volume 6 (PDF - 13.8 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2007 **Date Published:**August 2007

**Proceedings****edited by:** Thomas G. Scarbrough Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

**Symposium sponsored by:** Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Board of Nuclear Codes and Standards American Society of Mechanical Engineers Three Park Avenue New York, NY 10016-5990

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The 2006 Symposium on Valves, Pumps and Inservice Testing, jointly sponsored by the Board of Nuclear Codes and Standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, provides a forum for exchanging information on technical, programmatic and regulatory issues associated with inservice testing programs at nuclear power plants, including the design, operation and testing of valves and pumps. The symposium provides an opportunity to discuss improvements in design, operation and testing of valves and pumps that help to ensure their reliable performance. The participation of industry representatives, regulatory personnel, and consultants ensures the presentatation of a broad spectrum of ideas and perspectives to be discussed regarding the improvement of testing programs and methods for valves and pumps at nuclear power plants.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No: III-19-013 June 13, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Open House to Discuss

2018 Performance of Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of the 

Prairie Island nuclear power plant during an open house on June 25 in Red Wing, Minn.

The open house, to be held at the Red Wing Public Library, Foot Room, 225 East Ave., will 

run from 4-6 p.m. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident 

inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss the plant’s performance.

The two-unit facility, operated by Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, is located in 

Welch, Minn., approximately 28 miles southeast of Minneapolis.

Prairie Island operated safely during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection findings and 

performance indicators were of very low safety significance. As a result, it remains under the 

NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from 

the Region III office located in Lisle, Ill.

The annual assessment letter for Prairie Island, as well as the notice for the open house, are 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also 

available.
#### HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY and National Indemnity Company, petitioners, v. Douglas W. OESTERLE.

No. 81-1360.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 24, 1982.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Denied.
No. 90-6361.

#### Dawson *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Anderson, Appellant, vs. Nelson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *M. J. McDonald*and *Beznor, McDonald & Beznor,*attorneys, and *Lee K. Beznor*of counsel, all of Balsam Lake.

For the respondent: *Nelton ■& McGinnis*of Balsam Lake, attorneys, and *G. Burgess Ela*of Madison of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
No. 07-15-00270-CR

Dwayne McGowan

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the 52nd District Court 

 of Coryell County

November 9, 2016

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 9, 2016, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is modified as set forth in the 

opinion and affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o