4244 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 

2See Lightweight Thermal Paper From Germany: 

Notice of Final Results of the First Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 22078 (April 20, 

2011) (Final Results). 

3 Id. 

4See Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United 

States, Court No. 11–00147. 

5See 19 CFR 351.401(c) and 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(38). 

6See Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United 

States, 971 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 1250–59 (CIT 2014). 

7See Remand Redetermination at 4–5. 

8 Id. 

9See Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United 

States, Court No. 11–000147, Slip Op. 14–160 (CIT 

December 31, 2014). 

10See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

11See Lightweight Thermal Paper From Germany: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 34719 (June 18, 2014). 

1See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 42758 (July 23, 2014) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

the period of review (POR) November 

20, 2008, through October 31, 2009,2

and is amending the Final Results with 

respect to the weighted-average 

dumping margin assigned to 

Papierfabrik August Koehler AG 

(Koehler). 

DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Moore or George McMahon, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3692 and (202) 482–1167, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 20, 2011, the Department 

published its Final Results in which it 

assigned Koehler a weighted-average 

dumping margin of 3.77 percent.3 At the 

CIT, Koehler challenged the 

Department’s determination to deny 

Koehler’s claimed adjustment for certain 

home market rebates in the Final 

Results.4 Upon review, the CIT 

remanded the Final Results, holding 

that the Department’s decision to 

disallow an adjustment to Koehler’s 

normal value for its monthly home 

market rebates (monatsbonus) was 

unsupported by law because the 

governing regulations 5 did not give the 

Department the discretion not to allow 

for such an adjustment.6 On remand, the 

Department reconsidered its findings 

and determined, under protest, that the 

court’s interpretation of the relevant 

regulations resulted in no alternative 

but to alter the Final Results by granting 

the home market rebate price 

adjustment claimed by Koehler.7 The 

resulting recalculated rate for Koehler is 

0.03 percent, which is de minimis.8 On 

December 31, 2014, the CIT entered 

final judgment affirming the Remand 

Redetermination.9

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 

341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, 

the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 

516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), the Department 

must publish a notice of a court 

decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with 

a Department determination and must 

suspend liquidation of entries pending 

a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

December 31, 2014 judgment affirming 

the Department’s Remand 

Redetermination with respect to Koehler 

constitutes a final decision of the Court 

that is not in harmony with the 

Department’s Final Results. This notice 

is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, we are amending the Final 

Results with respect to Koehler’s margin 

for the period November 20, 2008, 

through October 31, 2009. The revised 

weighted-average dumping margin is as 

follows: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Papierfabrik August 

Koehler AG.

0.03 (de minimis.) 

Accordingly, the Department will 

continue the suspension of liquidation 

of the subject merchandise pending the 

expiration of the period of appeal, or, if 

appealed, pending a final and 

conclusive court decision. In the event 

the CIT’s final judgment is not appealed, 

or if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, the 

Department will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to liquidate 

unliquidated entries of the subject 

merchandise exported by Koehler 

during the POR without regard to duties 

because Koehler’s revised rate, as 

determined in the Remand 

Redetermination, is de minimis.10

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Since the Final Results, the 

Department has established a new cash 

deposit rate for Koehler. Therefore, 

Koehler’s cash deposit rate does not 

need to be updated as a result of these 

amended final results. The cash deposit 

rate for Koehler will remain the 

company-specific rate established for 

the most recent period during which the 

respondent was reviewed, which is 0.00 

percent.11

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 21, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01505 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Results of the New Shipper Review; 

2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 23, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results and partial rescission of the 26th 

administrative review and the 

preliminary results of one new shipper 

review (NSR) of the antidumping duty 

order on tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof, finished and unfinished 

(TRBs), from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC).1 The period of review 

(POR) is June 1, 2012, through May 31, 

2013. Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

certain changes in the margin 

calculations. Therefore, the final results 

differ from the preliminary results. The 

final weighted-average dumping 

margins for the reviewed firms are listed 

below in the section entitled ‘‘Final 

Results of the Reviews.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: January 27, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Blaine Wiltse or Steve Bailey, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office II, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6345 or (202) 482– 

0193, respectively. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4245 

2This review originally covered four exporters. 

However, the Department rescinded the review 

with respect to Xiangyang Automobile Bearing Co., 

Ltd. and GGB Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., 

Ltd. in the Preliminary Results. See Preliminary 

Results, 79 FR at 42758–59. 3See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, from Blaine 

Wiltse, Senior International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office II, Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Operations, entitled, ‘‘Tapered Roller Bearings 

and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from 

the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New Shipper Review,’’ 

dated October 27, 2014. 

4See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or 

Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China, 

52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987) (Order). 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum 

for the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 

and New Shipper Review (2012–2013): Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 

Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary 

for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

dated concurrently with, and adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memo). 

6See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 42759, and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

at 4–7. 

7See, e.g., Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review and 

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review, 73 FR 

8273, 8279 (February 13, 2008) (unchanged in 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper 

Review, 73 FR 49162 (August 20, 2008)). 

8See, e.g., Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010– 

2011, 78 FR 3396, 3397 (January 16, 2013). 

9On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

Background 

These final results of administrative 

review cover two exporters 2 of the 

subject merchandise, of which the 

Department selected Changshan Peer 

Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/SKF) as a 

mandatory respondent for individual 

examination. The respondent which 

was not selected for individual 

examination, Zhejiang Zhaofeng 

Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd. 

(Zhaofeng), is listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Reviews’’ section of this 

notice. The NSR covers entries 

produced and exported by Shanghai 

Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Tainai). 

On July 23, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. In 

August 2014, we received case and 

rebuttal briefs from the Timken 

Company (the petitioner) and CPZ/SKF. 

In August 2014, we also received a 

rebuttal brief from Tainai. In September 

2014, the Department held a public 

hearing at the request of the petitioner. 

On October 27, 2014, the Department 

extended the final results in these 

reviews to no later than January 20, 

2015.3

The Department has conducted these 

reviews in accordance with section 751 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order 4 includes tapered roller bearings 

tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished and unfinished, from the PRC; 

flange, take up cartridge, and hanger 

units incorporating tapered roller 

bearings; and tapered roller housings 

(except pillow blocks) incorporating 

tapered rollers, with or without 

spindles, whether or not for automotive 

use. These products are currently 

classifiable under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers 8482.20.00, 

8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 

8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 

8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 

8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. 

Although the HTSUS item numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive.5

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that evidence provided by CPZ/SKF, 

Tainai, and Zhaofeng supported finding 

an absence of both de jure and de facto 

government control, and, therefore, we 

preliminarily granted a separate rate to 

each of these companies.6 We have 

received no information since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results that 

provides a basis for reconsidering these 

determinations. Therefore, for the final 

results, we continue to find that CPZ/

SKF, Tainai, and Zhaofeng are eligible 

for a separate rate. 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for 

the Non-Examined, Separate-Rate 

Company 

For the exporters subject to a review 

that are determined to be eligible for a 

separate rate, but are not selected as 

individually examined respondents, the 

Department generally weight averages 

the rates calculated for the individually 

examined respondents, excluding any 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.7 In this 

administrative review, the only 

individually-examined company is 

CPZ/SKF, which has a rate that is not 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. Accordingly, consistent 

with the Department’s practice,8 we 

have determined that the weightedaverage dumping margin to be assigned 

to the separate rate respondent not 

individually examined (i.e., Zhaofeng) 

should be the weighted-average 

dumping margin calculated for the 

mandatory respondent, CPZ/SKF. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues which have been raised in 

the case briefs by parties to this 

administrative review and this NSR are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memo. A list of the issues which parties 

raised and to which we respond in the 

Issues and Decision Memo is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. The Issues 

and Decision Memo is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).9 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/

index.html. The signed Issues and 

Decision Memo and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memo are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made changes 

in the margin calculations for CPZ/SKF 

and Tainai. These changes are discussed 

in the relevant sections of the Issues and 

Decision Memo and company-specific 

analysis memoranda, as appropriate. 

Period of Review 

The POR is June 1, 2012, through May 

31, 2013. 

Final Results of the Reviews 

Regarding the administrative review, 

we are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2013: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4246 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 

10See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

11See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

12See e.g., Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 

2011–2012, 78 FR 33341, 33342 (June 4, 2013). 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 0.65 

Zhejiang Zhaofeng Mechanical and Electronic Co., Ltd * ........................................................................................................... 0.65 

* This company demonstrated eligibility for a separate rate in this administrative review. As discussed above, the rate for this company is the 

calculated weighted-average dumping margin for CPZ/SKF. 

Regarding the NSR, we are assigning 

the following weighted-average 

dumping margin to the exporter/

producer combination listed below for 

the period June 1, 2012, through May 

31, 2013: 

Exporter Producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd .......................................... Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd .......................................... 0.00 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the 

Department has determined, and 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise, where applicable, in 

accordance with the final results of 

these reviews. The Department intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

15 days after the date of publication of 

these final results of reviews. 

For each individually-examined 

respondent (either the exporter or 

producer and exporter combination 

specified above) whose weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), 

we calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates for entries subject to 

these reviews. For entries of subject 

merchandise exported by CPZ/SKF and 

for entries of subject merchandise 

produced and exported by Tainai, we 

calculated an ad valorem rate for each 

importer by dividing the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales by the total entered 

values associated with those sales, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

For duty assessment rates calculated on 

this basis, we will direct CBP to assess 

the resulting ad valorem rate against the 

entered customs values for the subject 

merchandise. We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review where an importer-specific 

assessment rate is not zero or de 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.10

For Zhaofeng, the ad valorem 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

assigned above in the final results of 

review. 

On October 24, 2011, the Department 

announced a refinement to its 

assessment practice in NME cases. 

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by the 

company individually examined during 

this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the rate applicable to the PRC-wide 

entity (i.e., 92.84 percent).11

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that 

currently have separate a rate, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the exporter received 

that separate rate; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, 

92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. 

With respect to the NSR, consistent 

with the Department’s practice,12 the 

Department has established a producer/ 

exporter combination cash deposit rate 

for Tainai as follows: (1) For subject 

merchandise exported and produced by 

Tainai, the cash deposit rate will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin for Tainai in the final results of 

this review; (2) for subject merchandise 

exported by Tainai but not produced by 

Tainai, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate for the PRC-wide entity, 92.84 

percent; (3) for subject merchandise 

produced by Tainai but not exported by 

Tainai, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to that exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notifications to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4247 

1See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Intent To 

Rescind Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 

2012–2013, 79 FR 58743 (September 30, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Rescission’’). 

2Petitioner is Elkay Manufacturing Company. 

3See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, re: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of New Shipper Review 

of Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s 

Republic of China, dated December 12, 2014. 

4See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the 

People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 

(‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’) and hereby 

adopted by this notice, for a complete description 

of the Scope of the Order. 5See Memorandum to Melissa Skinner, Director, 

Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, through Erin Begnal, Program Manager, 

Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, from Joy Zhang, International Trade 

Analyst, titled ‘‘Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review of Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Bona Fide Sales 

Analysis for Hubei Foshan Success Imp. & Exp. Co., 

Ltd.,’’ dated September 23, 2014. 

6On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of review in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 20, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memo 

1. Surrogate Value for Truck Freight 

2. Using the Sigma Cap and Unreported 

Affiliate Distances 

3. By-Products Offsets 

CPZ/SKF Issues 

4. Collapsing of Shanghai General Bearing 

Co., Ltd. and CPZ/SKF 

5. Adverse Facts Available for CPZ/SKF 

6. Market Economy Purchases of Steel 

7. Calculation of Input Freight 

8. Including Certain Fees in International 

Freight Expenses 

9. Treatment of Value Added Tax 

Tainai Issues 

10. AFA for Tainai 

[FR Doc. 2015–01489 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–983] 

Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement of Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 30, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published its 

preliminary intent to rescind the new 

shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the 

antidumping duty order on drawn 

stainless steel sinks (‘‘drawn sinks’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) of October 4, 2012 through 

October 14, 2013 for Hubei Foshan 

Success Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. (‘‘Foshan 

Success’’).1 Based on our analysis of 

comments received subsequent to the 

Preliminary Rescission, the Department 

continues to find that Foshan Success’ 

sale was not bona fide. As a result, the 

Department is rescinding this NSR. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 27, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang or Erin Begnal, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482– 

1442, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 30, 2014, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Rescission. On October 22, 2014, Foshan 

Success submitted a case brief. On 

November 4, 2014, Petitioner 2

submitted a rebuttal brief. On December 

12, 2014, the Department extended the 

time period for issuing the final results 

by 30 days until January 21, 2015.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the scope of 

the order are drawn stainless steel sinks 

with single or multiple drawn bowls, 

with or without drain boards, whether 

finished or unfinished, regardless of 

type of finish, gauge, or grade of 

stainless steel. The products covered by 

this order are currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under 

statistical reporting numbers 

7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.00.10. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope is dispositive.4

Final Rescission of New Shipper 

Review 

As we explain in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum and in the 

proprietary Foshan Success Bona Fides 

Memorandum 5 issued with the 

Preliminary Rescission, due to the 

totality of circumstances, including the 

price and quantity of Foshan Success’ 

single sale and the importer’s failure to 

provide evidence that the subject 

merchandise was resold at a profit, we 

continue to find that Foshan Success’ 

sale is not bona fide. As a result, we are 

rescinding the new shipper review of 

Foshan Success. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

which is dated concurrently and is 

hereby adopted by this notice. A list of 

the issues raised in the briefs and 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s centralized electronic 

service system (‘‘ACCESS’’).6 ACCESS is 

available to registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and in the 

Department’s Central Records Unit, 

Room 7064 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and electronic versions of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Effective upon publication of the final 

rescission of the NSR of Foshan 

Success, the Department will instruct 

CBP to discontinue the option of posting 

a bond or security in lieu of a cash 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES