alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.2 Post Test Analysis and Accuracy Quantification of SPES Test SP-SB-03 (NUREG/IA-0154)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0154 (PDF 5.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 1999

**Prepared by:** F. D'Auria M. Frogheri* W. Giannotti

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The present document deals with the Relap5/Mod3.2 analysis of the Small Break LOCA experiment SP-SB-03 performed in SPES facility.

SPES is a PWR simulator (Integral Test Facility) installed at SIET center in Piacenza (I). Volume scaling and core power scaling factors are 1/427, with respect to the Westinghouse 900 MWe standard reactor.

The experiment is originated by a small break in the cold leg (2" equivalent break area in the plant) without the actuation of the high pressure injection system. Low pressure injection system actuation occurs after core dry-out.

The Relap5 code has been extensively used at University of Pisa; the nodalization of SPES facility has been qualified through the application of the version Relap5/Mod2 to the same experiment and another test performed in the same facility.

Sensitivity analyses have been addressed to the influence of several parameters (like discharge break coefficient, time of accumulators start etc.) upon the predicted transient evolution. Qualitative and quantitative code calculation accuracy evaluation has been performed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### In the Matter of Maurice Ingram, Petitioner, v Louis Mann, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 191]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

As the result of an incident in which petitioner failed to terminate a telephone call and return to his cell before it was locked, petitioner was found guilty of being out of place and violating count procedures. He contends that the determination of guilt is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. We disagree. The evidence against petitioner consisted of a misbehavior report authored by a correction officer who witnessed the incident. This, coupled with petitioner’s admission that he did not arrive at his cell until after the doors had *744been locked, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination. We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### Home Insurance Company, Appellant, v Olympia & York Maiden Lane Company et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 158]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered January 3, 1995, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The lease at issue expressly stated that the annual Operating Statements forwarded by the landlord would become "conclusive and binding” on the tenant in absence of timely dispute within 60 days of receipt thereof and, where no immediate settlement could be reached, in absence of a demand for arbitration within 120 days of receipt. The landlord was entitled to rely upon the express terms of the lease *(see, Matter of New York Plaza Bldg. Co. [Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.],*103 AD2d 203, 208-209). Plaintiff concedes that it never disputed the Operating Statements for the years in question, nor demanded arbitration with respect thereto. Accordingly, plaintiffs claims are precluded, and the complaint properly was dismissed. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of VitaCubeSystems Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Earnest Mathis, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ *Earnest  Mathis, Jr.* |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Earnest Mathis, Jr.        |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
|                            |
| March 31, 2006             |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE FRENO PRICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-6539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE FRENO PRICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00048-jlk)

Submitted: June 6, 2008 Decided: June 26, 2008

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Freno Price, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Willie Freno Price appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)

(motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the

district court”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Standard Technical Specifications — Babcock and Wilcox  Plants (NUREG-1430,  Revision 5)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, December 06, 2021
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of LCA-Vision Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
such officer’s knowledge, that:





This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      July 27, 2010
            /s/ David L. ThomasDavid
      L. ThomasChief
      Operating OfficerDate:
      July 27, 2010
            /s/ Michael J.
CelebrezzeMichael
      J. CelebrezzeSenior
      Vice President of Finance,Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer
# L_2015184EN.01001601.xml

| 11.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/16

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/1128

of 7 July 2015

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (EU BAM Rafah/1/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP of 12 December 2005 on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point, EU BAM Rafah (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 29 May 2015, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Ms Natalina CEA as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 29 May 2015, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Ms Natalina CEA as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.

| (3) | Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1065 (2) extended the duration of EU BAM Rafah until 30 June 2016, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1065 (2) extended the duration of EU BAM Rafah until 30 June 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Natalina CEA is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of EU BAM Rafah for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 July 2015.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 327, 14.12.2005, p. 28.

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1065 of 2 July 2015 amending Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (OJ L 174, 3.7.2015, p. 23).

2

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Application of Automated Analysis Software to Eddy Current Inspection Data from Steam Generator Tube Bundle Mock-up (NUREG/CR-7217, ANL-11/60)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7217 (PDF – 4.47 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2012**Date Published:** September 2016

**Prepared by:** S. Bakhtiari, W.J. Shack and T.W. Elmer Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439

M. Rossi, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code Y6582

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents the results of evaluations of computerized data screening software used for analyzing eddy current data obtained during the inspection of steam generator tubes. The work was performed at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) as part of on-going activities under the International Steam Generator Tube Integrity Program (ISG-TIP) sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Following the initial review of the available literature, a software-based tool widely used by industry for in-service inspection applications was acquired and used to automatically analyze bobbin probe data collected previously from the ANL-NRC steam generator tube bundle mock-up. A subset of that data was initially used to establish data screening parameters. The results of those tests were used to iteratively adjust the data screening parameters to further evaluate their influence on the detection and classification of signals. Alternative configurations of the data screening parameters for different regions of the SG mock-up were further examined. The detection probability and false call rate were evaluated to help determine the influence of selected data screening parameters on the performance of automated data analysis software. The data in each chosen configuration was sorted out using special-purpose algorithms generated at Argonne with standard spreadsheet software. The results of analyses performed on eddy current inspection data from different elevations of the SG mock-up are discussed in this report. Comparisons are made between the detection probability results based on automated analysis with that based on manual analysis of data from a previous round-robin exercise. Some general remarks are finally provided regarding advantages and limitations of conventional automated data analysis programs for inservice inspection of steam generator tubes based on bobbin probe examinations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 20(b)

                    ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


                          Officer's Certificate
                          ---------------------

     I, George E. Borst, President and Chief Executive Officer of Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation ("TMCC"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  a review of the activities of TMCC as Servicer under the Sale and
          Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated August 1, 2001 among
          TMCC, Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC as Seller, and
          U.S. Bank as Trustee, for the period from August 1, 2001 through
          March 31, 2002 and of the performance of the Servicer under the
          Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (b)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
          period.



Date:  April 10, 2002                         /S/ GEORGE E. BORST
                                        ------------------------------------
                                                  George E. Borst
                                                   President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
_____________

No. 95-3939SD

_____________

David R. Bradley, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of South Dakota.

Pat Lichty, P.H.S. Director at *

South Dakota State Penitentiary;* [UNPUBLISHED]

Joe Class, Warden; Dr. Schaffer,*

S.D.S.P.; Kay Paa, Nurse, *

S.D.S.P., *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

Submitted: December 13, 1995

 Filed: January 2, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

David R. Bradley appeals the district court's dismissal of

Bradley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Our decision is guided by

this court's recent decision in Wiedermann v. Lichty, No. 95-3339

(8th Cir. Dec. 12, 1995). For the reasons given in Wiedermann, we

reverse and remand for further proceedings.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 90-5932.

No. 90-6044.

No. 90-6111.

#### Miller *v.*California. Baxter *v.*Kemp, Warden. Correll *v.*Thompson, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Cal.;

Sup. Ct. Ga.; and

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 90-5932, 50 Cal. 3d 954, 790 P. 2d 1289; No. 90-6044, 260 Ga. 184, 391 S. E. 2d 754.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, *Gregg*v. *Georgia,*428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,370
<SECURITIES>                                     3,548
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,956
<PP&E>                                           1,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,379
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,916
<CGS>                                            1,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    603
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

April 26, 2013

The Board of Directors

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

No. 1, R & D Road 1

Hsinchu Science
Park

Hsinchu City, 30076

Republic
of China

Attention: Mr. S.J. Cheng

Dear Sirs,

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130230 on Form F-3 and Registration Statements Nos.
333- 176935, 333-137838, 333-116670 and 333-85290 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the Company), and the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report). We also consent to the inclusion of our report in the
Annual Report.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Moore Stephens

Certified Public
Accountants

Hong Kong
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. MICHELLE B. CASTILLO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 50254
D.C. No. 3:20

- cr - 00180

- LAB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2021 * *
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. Michelle B. Castillo appeal s from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 78

- month sentence imposed following her guilty

- plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 17 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 50254

Castillo contends that the district court erred by denying her request for a minor

- role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2

. We review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and its application of the Guidelines for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Diaz , 884 F.3d 911, 914 (9th Cir. 2018)

. Contrary to Castil lo’s claim s , the record reflects that the district court identified and applied the correct legal standard , recognized its obligation to compare Castillo’s conduct to that of other known or likely participants in her criminal scheme , and considered each of the guideline
factors

. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C); Diaz , 884 F.3d at 916

- 17

. Given the totality of the circumstances, t he court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that C astillo was not “substantially less culpable than the average participant

. ” See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) ; United States v. Quintero

- Leyva , 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016) ( sentencing court may d eny a minor

- role adjustment “even if some of the factors weigh in favor” of granting it).
Castillo also cont ends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable

. The
district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The significantly below

- Guideline sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, including the circumstances of Castillo’s offense. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51. Moreover, contrary to Castillo’s assertion , the record reflects that the court3 20

- 50254

considered her m itigating arguments and the section 3553(a) factors

. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.