alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC

EXHIBITS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Cingular Wireless LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter A. Ritcher, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        By: /s/ Peter A. Ritcher
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Peter A. Ritcher
                                            Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 24, 2006
Exhibit 15.2

April 18, 2016

The Board of Directors

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

No. 1, R & D Road 1

Hsinchu Science Park

Hsinchu City, 30076

Republic of China

Attention:
Mr. Shih-Jye Cheng

Dear Sirs,

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-130230 on Form F-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-176935, 333-137838, 333-116670 and 333-85290 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and for each of two years in the period ended December 31, 2014, which appeared in ChipMOS
TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTDs annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Annual Report). We also consent to the inclusion of our report in the Annual Report.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Yours faithfully,             
|                              
|/s/ Moore Stephens CPA Limited
|Certified Public Accountants  
|                              
|Hong Kong
Order entered December 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01499-CV

IN RE THE HONORABLE SUZANNE WOOTEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from 

Collin County, Texas

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, andEvans

Before the Court are relator’s December 6, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus and 

emergency motion for temporary relief. Based on the Court’s memorandum opinion of this date, 

we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

PRESIDING JUSTICE
# L_2015192EN.01001901.xml

| 18.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/19

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/1182

of 17 July 2015

approving the adjustment programme of Greece

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the strengthening of economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability (1), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

1

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 sets rules for the approval of a macro-economic adjustment programme for a Member State in receipt of financial assistance, including from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). These rules need to be consistent with the provisions of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 (2) establishing the EFSM. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 sets rules for the approval of a macro-economic adjustment programme for a Member State in receipt of financial assistance, including from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). These rules need to be consistent with the provisions of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 (2) establishing the EFSM.

2

| (2) | Greece has been granted financial assistance from the EFSM by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181 (3) on granting short-term Union financial assistance to Greece. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Greece has been granted financial assistance from the EFSM by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181 (3) on granting short-term Union financial assistance to Greece.

3

| (3) | For reasons of consistency, the approval of the macroeconomic adjustment programme for Greece under Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 should be done by reference to the relevant provisions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

For reasons of consistency, the approval of the macroeconomic adjustment programme for Greece under Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 should be done by reference to the relevant provisions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measures specified in Article 3(3) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1181 to be taken by Greece as part of its adjustment programme are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect upon the date of its notification.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  OJ L 140, 27.5.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1).

2

(3)  See page 15 of this Official Journal.

3

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 57)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 57, Final Report (PDF – 38.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2016**Date Published:** August 2016

Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) has been prepared in response to an application submitted by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon), to renew the operating licenses for LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 (LSCS) for an additional 20 years.

This SEIS includes the analysis that evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action. Alternatives considered include: (1) new nuclear power generation, (2) coal-integrated gasification combined-cycle, (3) natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC), (4) a combination of NGCC, wind, and solar generation, (5) purchased power, and (6) the no-action alternative (i.e., no renewal of the licenses).

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for LSCS are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. The NRC staff based its recommendation on the following factors:
        - the analysis and findings in NUREG–1437, Volumes 1 and 2,  Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants;
        - the Environmental Report submitted by Exelon;
        - consultation with Federal, State, local, and Tribal government agencies;
        - the NRC staff's independent environmental review; and
        - consideration of public comments received during the scoping process and received on the draft SEIS.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# L_2014341EN.01003101.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/31

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 938/2014 of 2 September 2014 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not, and making such imports subject to registration

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 263 of 3 September 2014
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 263 of 3 September 2014

On page 5, recital 3:

for:

‘... falling within CN codes 8712 00 30 and ex 8712 00 70 and originating in the People's Republic of China (“the product concerned”).’,

read:

‘... falling within CN codes ex 8712 00 30 and ex 8712 00 70 and originating in the People's Republic of China (“the product concerned”).’.

---
#### Kazmierczak and wife, Respondents, vs. Kokot, Appellant.

*October 8*

October *28, 1913.*

*Special verdict: Defects: New trial: Terms: Negligence: Burning of property. .*

1. A special verdict to the effect tkat a fire set by defendant on bis own land spread to plaintiff’s land and burned and injured his timber; that the setting of such fire was an act of ordinary care and prudence; that defendant used ordinary care and prudence in preventing the fire from getting upon plaintiff’s land; that the fire was the proximate cause of the burning of plaintiff’s property; and that plaintiff might, by ordinary care, have saved his property or some part of it and prevented the same from being burned after he knew of the danger, is *heló,*to be defective.

2. A new trial granted in such case upon the court’s own motion, on the ground that the verdict was inconsistent and contrary to law and the evidence, was properly granted without costs, to either party.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Forest county: W. B. QuiNLAN, 'Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The appeal is from an order granting a new trial.

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Goodrich & Goodrich.*

*John F.*Hooper, for the respondents.

TimliN, J.

After a special verdict a new trial was granted without costs on the ground that the special verdict was “inconsistent” and contrary to the law and the evidence *600and not sustained by the evidence. The verdict found for the defendant upon the question of his alleged negligence in setting a fire on his land which spread to the adjoining land of the plaintiff and that the defendant used ordinary care and prudence in managing said fire and in preventing it from escaping and getting on plaintiff’s land. The fire did burn and damage plaintiff’s wood, timber, trees, and fence, and the fire was the proximate cause of the burning of plaintiff’s property. The plaintiff in the exercise of ordinary care could have saved his property *or some part of it*and prevented the same from being burned after he saw or knew there was danger of its destruction. There was evidence for and against these findings.

“Inconsistent” may not be the right word to describe the defects in the verdict, but the verdict was certainly defective. The sixth question finds only the very obvious and irrelevant truth that “the fire so set by defendant” was “the proximate cause of the burning;” while the seventh question finds that the plaintiff by the exercise of ordinary care might have saved his property or some part of it. The new trial granted upon both grounds above stated might well have been granted without costs. We perceive no error in the order appealed from.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Balaton Power Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 22, 2011                                                                          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|"Michael Rosa"Michael Rosa, President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Date: June 22, 2011                                                                          
|                                                                                             
|"Paul Preston"Paul E. Preston, Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)        
|
|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No: II-19-023 April 22, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for May 9 to provide 

information and answer questions regarding the safety performance of the Watts Bar nuclear power 

plant, including the recent annual assessment letter covering all of 2018.

The open house will run from 5-6 p.m. in the Spring City Municipal Building, 229 Front St.,

Spring City, Tenn. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available at the open house.

The two-unit Watts Bar plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located near 

Spring City, approximately 60 miles southwest of Knoxville.

The NRC concluded that the Watts Bar plant operated safely during 2018. However, Unit 2 

received increased oversight during 2018 resulting from a white performance indicator for the number 

of unplanned reactor shutdowns. A recently issued violation associated with a white inspection finding 

related to the plant’s emergency plan and improperly calibrated radiation monitors led to increased 

oversight. TVA has taken corrective actions in both areas.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance

indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight.

Inspections are performed by the NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from the

NRC Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter, which includes upcoming inspection plans for the plant, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also on the 

website and is updated on a quarterly basis.
$OWKRXJK WKH FDSWLRQ RI WKH FDVH KDV LGHQWLILHG WKH SODLQWLII DV32XU *DUDJH ́ WKURXJKRXW WKH FRXUVH RI WKLV OLWLJDWLRQ WKHFRPSDQ\¶VQDPH LQ IDFW LV 32XUV*DUDJH ́ :H ZLOO UHIHU WR WKH FRPSDQ\ DV 32XUV*DUDJH ́5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

			



85$5$*( $1'5(&.(5(59,&( 2:,1*(&29(5<662&,$7,21 2)+,2	
,7< 2)2/80%86 $9,',/621 2%%,(($9(56	
 !"#$%&'(!
)*'!+	'"'!,*,'%*-'.%'$%'(!	.'(!%)*,'%*-'$(*"'#.&/.,0!%1!	&*'(*,'%*-'2.+1!%1.!+32.)!45!-*+!+")+*#!+32.)!5!$%!36
7")+8*%-.*'2.+1!,5
  !"
 
  	.,")  ,(/%9 7
8
	 
::;	  #.&/., (* $%  !##")'"<*+  !%%*, 7
7 =  8
=:#.&/.,(*$% !##!!2"&!,.%9("%+'
:77=8#!+(*$%&*-.,.%*"!7
 8 7 *%-.*' 2.+1!  =#"*)'*$$, !##!!,.%,"%"1!")+%!-9!%	!%<*-!
)->?.%,@A")(*-% %"'*) !%"'*)1"'B*)1/.,*)!,,*)'(!*'C$#.&/.,")+'(!B*)1")+!-<!%C,,-*"'*)$(*>?@A"'%"+!",,-*"'*)$'B'%.-9 !%"'%,/%.1(',.*'"1"*),''(!*'C$#.&/.,>'(!?*'C@A")+-!%'"*)$*',$$*-*"#,'!)D*)!)$%-!&!)'$(" '!%E$'(!#.&/.,*'C+!>'(!?'B*)1%+*)")-!@AB(*-(%!1.#"'!,-),!),."#'B*)1 !%"'*),	 !-*$*-"##C.%,")+"##!1!+'("''(!
)'!%,'"'!&&!%-!-'>?
@A 
	 F E>-A>A %!!& ', '(! 'B*)1 %+*)")-!B(*-("&)1'(!%'(*)1,%!G.*%!,'(!B)!%,")+ !%"'%,$ 'B '%.-9, ' /'"*) " #*-!),! $%& '(! *'C &"*)'"*)*),.%")-!")+-& #CB*'('(!% %!1.#"'%C %!G.*%!&!)', ,7< 2)2/80%86 +,22'( -( E>A)-%,,&'*),$%,.&&"%CD.+1&!)''(!+*,'%*-'-.%' %.#!+ *) $"<% $ .%, ")+  ")+ !%&")!)'#C!)D*)!+'(!*'C$%&!)$%-*)1'(!'B*)1%+*)")-!(*," !"#$##B!+) # 5H+EIEEEEEIEEH>H'( *% 5A B! (!#+ '("' '(! 
 +!, )' %!!& '&.)*-* "##*-!),*)1")+,"$!'C%!1.#"'*)$))-),!),."#'B*)1  !%"'*), B(!) " &.)*-* "#*'C "-', ", " &"%9!'
  !"
"%'*-* ")' /.' +!, %!!& ' '(!% %!1.#"'*) )' $"##*)1B*'(*)'(*,)"%%B!J-! '*))" !"#'(!*'C-)-!+!,'("'-)'%#,'(!+*, ,*'*)$'(*,-",!--%+*)1#CB! "$$*%& '(! D.+1&!)' $ '(! +*,'%*-' -.%' !%&")!)'#C!)D*)*)1'(!*'C;,!)$%-!&!)'$'(!,!'B*)1 %<*,*),
# L_2015236EN.01000701.xml

| 10.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 236/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 236/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1509

of 4 September 2015

appointing an Italian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

1

2

3

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Clodovaldo RUFFATO, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Clodovaldo RUFFATO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Eros BREGA, Consigliere della Regione Umbria |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Eros BREGA, Consigliere della Regione Umbria

Consigliere della Regione Umbria

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2015.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(2)  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.

2

(3)  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01678]



[[Page 4939]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-SER-CONG-17094; PPSECONGS0/PPMPSPD1Z.YM00000]


Establishment of a New Fee Area at Congaree National Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Congaree National Park in South Carolina plans to collect 
expanded amenity recreation fees at the Longleaf Campground and Bluff 
Campground beginning in early 2015. Revenue will be used to cover the 
cost of collections at the campground and for deferred maintenance in 
the park.

DATES: We will begin collecting fees on July 28, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren Gurniewicz, Chief of 
Interpretation, Congaree National Park, 100 National Park Road, 
Hopkins, SC 29061; telephone (803) 647-3969; or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f19d908483949fae9684839f98948698928bb19f8182df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1975786c6b7c77467e6c6b77707c6e707a635977696a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to comply with Section 804 of 
the Federal Lands Recration Enhancement Act of 2004 (Pub.L. 108-447). 
The act requires agencies to give the public 6 months advance notice of 
the establishment of a new recreation fee area.
    Rates at Longleaf Campground will be $10 per night for an 
individual tent only site with no hook-ups; $20 per night for a group 
tent only site with no hook-ups. Rates at Bluff Campground will be $5 
per night for an individual tent only site with no hook-ups. These fees 
were determined through a comparability study of similar sites in the 
area at Federal, state, and private recreation areas and will only be 
charged at the Longleaf and Bluff campgrounds. In accordance with NPS 
public involvement guidelines, the park engaged numerous individuals, 
organizations, and local, state, and Federal government representatives 
while planning for the implementation of this fee.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Lena McDowall,
Associate Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-01678 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JD-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>