alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Maine Yankee to Brief NRC on Decommissioning Work on Nov. 9

----

----

I-98-122

November 4, 1998

**MAINE YANKEE TO BRIEF NRC ON DECOMMISSIONING WORK ON NOV. 9**

Representatives of the Maine Yankee nuclear power plant will provide Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff with an updated overview of decommissioning work at the permanently shutdown facility on Monday, November 9.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. in the former Energy Information Center at the Wiscasset, Maine, plant. It will be open to the public for observation. Among the topics to be discussed will be a proposed schedule for the completion of the work.

The plant's owner, the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, voted on August 6, 1997, to permanently cease operations at the pressurized-water reactor. Subsequently, in accordance with NRC regulations, the company submitted a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report to the agency outlining plans for terminating the facility and cleaning up the site.

Since then, Maine Yankee has hired Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. to handle the decommissioning project.

Maine Yankee has decided to use the DECON option for decommissioning the site. DECON is the alternative under which the equipment, structures and portions of the facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use once the removal/cleanup work is finished. Maine Yankee intends to complete the decontamination and dismantlement of the majority of plant structures within approximately seven years of the cessation of operations.

Members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC and Maine Yankee at the end of the meeting.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40714

Conference Calendar

__________________

CHARLES KENNETH NELSON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

OSCAR SOLIZ, DISTRICT CLERK

OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-93-CV-329

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Kenneth Nelson appeals an order of the district

court denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) relief from a judgment

dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous. He argues that

Soliz deprived him of his constitutional rights by failing to

provide the record and transcripts of his state court conviction

for his habeas corpus proceedings. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. 
No. 95-40714

-2-

Nelson has not alleged the deprivation of a federal

constitutional right.

 On appeal, Nelson can present no legal points arguable on

their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution

Nelson that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Nelson

is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have

been previously decided by this court.

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Report of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Piping Review Committee (NUREG-1061, Volume 4)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1061, Volume 4 (PDF - 16.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 1984**Date Published:** December 1984

**Prepared by:** The Other Dynamic Loads and Load Combinations Task Group

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report deals with six topical areas: Event Combinations, Response Combinations, Stress Limits and Dynamic Allowables, Water Hamer Loadings, Relief Valve Opening and Closing Loads and Piping Vibration Loads. Recommendations prepared by the staff were based on consultant position papers and industry comments and treat revisions to present NRC requirements and directions for future research. Foreign information was obtained from sources in Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Sweden and the Federal Republic of Germany. In addition, the report contains qualitative value impacts for the proposed recommendations. This report was developed over a period of approximately one year, and partially fulfills and complies with the requirements of the July 13, 1983 memorandum from the Directors of the Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Regulatory Research to NRC's Executive Director for Operations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### Thurow, Respondent, vs. Hustisford State Bank and another, Appellants.

*February 8*

March *6, 1928.*

Companion case to *Bischoff v. Hustisford State Bank, ante,*p. 312.

Appeals from an order of the circuit court for Dodge county: C. M. Davison, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed upon both appeals.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Skinner & Thauer*of Watertown and *Clark & Lueck*of Beaver Dam, and for the respondent on that of *Hoyt, Bender, McIntyre & Hoyt,*attorneys, and *Werner J. Trimborn,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

Rosenberry, J.

This is a companion case to *Bischoff v. Hustisford State Bank,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 312, 218 N. W. 353). The mandate in this case will be the same as in that case for the reasons there stated.

*By the Court.*— Upon the appeal of the defendants that part of the order appealed from is reversed. Upon plaintiff’s appeal the order sustaining the demurrer to the complaint is reversed. The cause is remitted with directions to overrule the demurrer and for the disposition of the case by the trial court as indicated in this opinion; no costs to be taxed by either party, the appellants to pay the clerk’s fees in this court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,097,712
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,097,712
<EQUITIES>                                       3,687
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,104,610
<CASH>                                          57,713
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             748,669
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          33,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,305,686
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,591,270
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            153,984
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                121,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,305,686
<PREMIUMS>                                     168,882
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             39,683
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,450
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                     140,561
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     72,238
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,412)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Ex. 99.2

I, Stamatis Molaris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Stelmar Shipping Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 16, 2003


/s/ Stamatis Molaris
--------------------
Stamatis Molaris
Chief Financial Officer

02509.0004 #409608
Exhibit 13.2

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented
in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes of
complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: April 18, 2016



/s/ Shou-Kang ChenName:

Shou-Kang ChenTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TERRY ALLEN JR., DC#C00076, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3714

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 16, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. 

Terry Allen, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ SMARTEN LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2018

- 1802

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:17

- cv

- 01381

- LMB

IDD, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.

______________________

JU DGMENT

______________________

R OBERT V ANDERHYE , McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff

appellant.

R ICHARD L. R AINEY , Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by R OBERT J ASON F OWLER , K EVIN R ICHARDS

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , W ALLACH , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 12, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Spent Fuel Pool Project Phase 1: Pre-Ignition and Ignition Testing of a Single Commercial 17x17 Pressurized Water Reactor Spent Fuel Assembly under Complete Loss of Coolant Accident Conditions (NUREG/CR-7215)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7215 (PDF – 4.69 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2013**Date Published:** April 2016

**Prepared by:** S.G. Durbin, E.R. Lindgren and A.S. Goldmann Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185

M. Zavisca, Z. Yuan, R. Karimi, A. Krall, and M. Khatib-Rahbar Energy Research, Inc. Rockville, MD 20847-2034

G. A. Zigh, NRC Technical Monitor A. Velazquez-Lozada, NRC Project Manager S. Gonzalez, NRC Project Manager 

NRC Job Code N6777

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), in collaboration with the Organization for Economic Corporation and Development (OECD), and 12 international partners, conducted an experimental program to obtain experimental data for the characterization of hydraulic and ignition phenomena of prototypic light water reactor fuel assemblies in a spent fuel pool under complete loss of coolant accidents for validation of the MELCOR severe accident computer code. MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code whose primary purpose is to model the progression of postulated accidents in light water reactors as well as non-reactor systems (e.g., spent fuel pool and dry cask). The experimental program, were conducted in two phases at Sandia National Laboratories. The first phase, described in this NUREG, focused on axial heating and zirconium fire propagation in a single 17x17 PWR fuel assembly. The results from the first phase of the experiments demonstrate that the MELCOR computer code can accurately simulate ignition timing and burn propagation in a single 17x17 PWR assembly under complete loss of coolant conditions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order entered November 2, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01273-CR

ANTONIO (TONY) RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 331st District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-84-075577

ORDER

On October 30, 2018, the Court received notification of substitution of counsel. We 

DIRECT the Clerk to REMOVE Don Morehart and LIST Shannon Hooks as counsel for 

appellant. All future correspondence should be sent to Shannon Hooks, 6910 Hart Lane #510, 

Austin, Texas 78731. 

The record has been filed. Appellant’s brief is due November 26, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A182
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsState-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project (NUREG/CR-7110)

# State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project Volume 1: Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis (NUREG/CR-7110, Volume 1, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7110, Volume 1, Revision 1 (PDF - 18.85 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2013**Date Published:** May 2013

**Prepared by:** Nathan Bixler, Randall Gauntt, Joseph Jones, Mark Leonard (dycoda LLC)

Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy

NRC Job Code N6306

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The evaluation of accident phenomena and the offsite consequences of severe reactor accidents has been the subject of considerable research by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) over the last several decades. As a consequence of this research focus, analyses of severe accidents at nuclear power reactors are more detailed, integrated, and realistic than at any time in the past. A desire to leverage this capability to address conservative aspects of previous reactor accident analysis efforts was a major motivating factor in the genesis of the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) project. By applying modern analysis tools and techniques, the SOARCA project developed a body of knowledge regarding the realistic outcomes of severe reactor accidents. To accomplish this objective, the SOARCA project used integrated modeling of accident progression and offsite consequences using both state-of-the-art computational analysis tools and best modeling practices drawn from the collective wisdom of the severe accident analysis community. This study focused on providing a realistic evaluation of accident progression, source term, and offsite consequences for the Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Station. By using the most current emergency preparedness practices, plant capabilities, and best available modeling, these analyses are more detailed, integrated, and realistic than past analyses. These analyses also consider all mitigative measures, contributing to a more realistic evaluation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 177

   To bar Supreme Court decisions in certain Patient Protection and 
                Affordable Care Act cases from citation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. King of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To bar Supreme Court decisions in certain Patient Protection and 
                Affordable Care Act cases from citation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BARRING PPACA SUPREME COURT CASES FROM CITATION.

    Under Article 3, Section 2, which allows Congress to provide 
exceptions and regulations for Supreme Court consideration of cases and 
controversies, the following cases are barred from citation for the 
purpose of precedence in all future cases after enactment: Nat'l Fed'n 
of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566, 2573, 183 L. Ed. 2d 450 
(2012) and King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 2480, 2485, 192 L. Ed. 2d 483 
(2015) and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751, 2782, 
189 L. Ed. 2d 675 (2014).
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffConsolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses (NUREG-1556)

# ConsolidatedGuidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Licenses Authorizing Distribution to General Licensees – Final Report (NUREG-1556, Volume 16, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1556, Volume 16, Revision 1 (PDF – 3.61 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2018**Date Published:**July 2018

**Prepared by:**U.S. BhachuG.C ComfortV. CoxF.C. GaskinsR.G. GattoneC. MattsenM. Shober

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This technical report contains information intended to provide program-specific guidance and assist applicants and licensees in preparing applications for materials licenses. In particular, it describes the types of information needed to complete U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Form 313, "Application for Materials License." This document describes both the methods acceptable to the NRC license reviewers in implementing the regulations and the techniques used by the reviewers in evaluating the application to determine if the proposed activities are acceptable for licensing purposes.

In addition to providing guidance on the distribution of generally licensed (GL) products containing byproduct material regulated under Title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) Part 31, "General Domestic Licenses for Byproduct Material," and 10 CFR Part 32, "Specific Domestic Licenses to Manufacture or Transfer Certain Items Containing Byproduct Material," the agency has revised this document to include guidance on the distribution of GL source material amended under 10 CFR Part 40, "Domestic Licensing of Source Material," and of GL special nuclear materials regulated under 10 CFR Part 70, "Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material."

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021