alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1766 

To prohibit conditioning health care provider licensure on participation in 

a health plan or the meaningful use of electronic health records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2017 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit conditioning health care provider licensure on 

participation in a health plan or the meaningful use 

of electronic health records. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Practice Free5 dom Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1766 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEALTH CARE PROVIDER LICENSURE CANNOT BE 

2 CONDITIONED ON PARTICIPATION IN A 

3 HEALTH PLAN OR THE MEANINGFUL USE OF 

4 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

6 Human Services and any State (as a condition of receiving 

7 Federal financial participation under title XIX of the So8 cial Security Act) may not require any health care pro9 vider, as a condition of licensure of the provider in any 

10 State— 

11 (1) to participate in any health plan; or 

12 (2) to comply with any requirements relating to 

13 the meaningful use of electronic health records (in14 cluding under part 170 of title 45, Code of Federal 

15 Regulations). 

16 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

17 (1) HEALTH PLAN.—The term ‘‘health plan’’ 

18 has the meaning given such term in section 1171(5) 

19 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d(5)), 

20 and includes a basic health program established 

21 under section 1331 of the Patient Protection and 

22 Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18051), a qualified 

23 health plan offered by a qualified nonprofit health 

24 insurance issuer under the Consumer Operated and 

25 Oriented Plan (CO–OP) program under section 

26 1322 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 18042), a qualified 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1766 IH

1 health plan offered under a health care choice com2 pact under section 1333 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 18053), a multi-State qualified health plan offered 

4 under section 1334 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 18054), 

5 or other health plan offered under title I of such 

6 Act. 

7 (2) HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.—The term 

8 ‘‘health care provider’’ means any person or entity 

9 that is required by State or Federal laws or regula10 tions to be licensed, registered, or certified to pro11 vide health care services and is so licensed, reg12 istered, or certified, or exempted from such require13 ment by other statute or regulation. 

14 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ has the mean15 ing given such term for purposes of title XIX of the 

16 Social Security Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, on Behalf of Nicholas A. and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused, Respondent, v Abigail A., Respondent, and Adrian L., Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 528]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Adrian L. appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings *653County (Pearce, J.), dated January 25, 1990, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 26, 1989, made after a hearing finding, *inter alia,*that he had abused Abigail A.’s children, placed three of the children in the custody of the Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order dated June 26, 1989.

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 163 

To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 

Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in Federal 

or State court. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. HASTINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified 

civil liability actions in Federal or State court. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Manufacturers 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 163 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON BRINGING QUALIFIED 

2 CIVIL LIABILITY ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR 

3 STATE COURT. 

4 Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful 

5 Commerce in Arms Act (15 U.S.C. 7901–7903; Public 

6 Law 109–92) are hereby repealed. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14213 and #14214]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Mississippi dated 01/20/2015. *Incident:*
                         Severe Weather and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         12/23/2014. *Effective Date:*
                         01/20/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/23/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/20/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Marion. Contiguous Counties: Mississippi, Jefferson Davis, Lamar, Lawrence, Pearl River, Walthall. Louisiana, Washington. The Interest Rates are: For Physical Damage:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.938Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14213 C and for economic injury is 14214 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Mississippi Louisiana (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: January 20, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01632 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-60047 Summary Calendar

SUE H. PATE

Plaintiff-Appellant

VERSUS

REGENCY SUBARU, INC.

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-309-BN) October 2, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant appeals the dismissal of her sex discrimination suit

against her former employer. The district court dismissed the

action under Rule 37 for numerous discovery abuses after repeated

warnings and the imposition of lesser sanctions. Our review of the

record and the parties’ briefs convinces us that the district court2

has not abused its discretion. Accordingly, essentially for the

reasons stated by the district court in its Opinion and Order filed

November 14, 1996, we AFFIRM.
Block Flow Handling of NCS by Formulators

10 (c)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARGARET F. SPENCER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-75, CA-96-56-2)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Margaret F. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. David Glenn Barger, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Spencer, Nos. CR-94-75; CA-96-56-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2014358EN.01005001.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/50

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 352 of 9 December 2014
  )

On page 13, Article 8(5), third subparagraph:

for:

‘
  31 March 2015
  ’,

read:

‘
  31 March 2016
  ’.

---
No. 82-5983.

#### Gadson *v.*Melleby et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Natural Circulation Assessment of a PWR Loss of Off-site Power with RELAP5/MOD 3.2 (NUREG/IA-0538)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0538 (PDF – 1.87 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2021**Date Published:** February 2023

**Prepared by:**R. Martí, O. Parera

IDOMAv. de la Fama, 11-15Cornellà de Llobregat 08940, Spain

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The work presented corresponds to the assessment of a PWR Loss of Off-Site Power with RELAP5 [1]. The RELAP5 input deck has been obtained from the existing RELAP5 input deck with some modifications. The calculated results were compared against the plant data. The results show that RELAP5 is capable of reproducing the phenomena with a good level of satisfaction. However, some discrepancies between the predicted variables and the plant data suggest further investigation of the RELAP model.

The simulations were prepared by IDOM Nuclear Services. A Spanish NPP provided the input model, the plant data, and transient available data and associated information.

The report is focused on the transient calculations and the modifications and conclusions obtained from them. The purpose of this work is to detect possible errors in the existing plant model and provide the modifications for the input model.

The work to which this report refers, falls within the framework of the CAMP/SPAIN Project. The objectives being those referred to in the CAMP Program itself, in particular, achievement of the capacity required to apply calculation tools supporting the quantitative analysis of transients and operation procedures, as well as joint participation in the international efforts aimed to validate and experience the use of appropriate calculation codes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 02, 2023
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Annual  Fuel Cycle Information Exchange (FCIX) Program (NUREG/BR-0352)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
1

Filed 10/21/14 In re J.S. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

----

In re J.S. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile
Court Law.

YOLO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Q.S.,

Defendant and Appellant. C075882

(Super. Ct. No s . JV12441, JV12443)

Father appeals from a juvenile court order terminating dependency jurisdiction

over the minor children, and exit orders granting mother sole legal and physical custody

of the children and limiting father to supervised visitation. Father notes this appeal is a

“ protective appeal ” intended to preserve issues raised in a prior appeal pending before

this court. Rather than write a new opening brief, father incorporates by reference the

opening and reply briefs he filed in that related appeal . (Rules of Court , rule

8.200(a)(5).)

Father ’ s sole contention in this appeal is that the orders from which he appeals are

“ legally unsupportable because the factual basis for those orders, and the subsequent2

orders, which removed the children from his legal and physica l custody, denied

reunification services to him, and allowed only supervised visits between him and his

children, were not supported by substantial evidence and/or were an abuse of discretion,

for the reasons specified in his opening and reply briefs in th e related appeal C074723. ”

I n our opinion in In re J.S. et al

. ( Oct

. 17 , 2014, C074723 ) [nonpub. opn.]), we concluded

(1) substantial evidence supports the juvenile court orders removing the children from

father’s custody and denying father reunification services , and (2) father forfeited his

claim that the juvenile court abused its discretion in reducing his visitation. Based on our

opinion in the related appeal, w e affirm the juvenile court orders terminating dependency

jur isdiction and the exit orders granting mother sole legal and physical custody and

limiting father to supervised visitation

.

DISPOSITION

The orders of the juvenile court are affirmed.

HOCH , J.

We concur:

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

NICHOLSON , J.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Initial Review Group; Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and 
Skin Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: February 26-27, 2015.
    Time: 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, 1750 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 814, Bethesda, MD 20817, 
301-594-4956, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#274b4e494f16674a464e4b09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="264a4f484e17664b474f4a08484f4e08414950">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01082 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before March 27, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA 
                        **Federal Register**
                         Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR pt. 0, subpart. R, App. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on November 19, 2014, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Attn: RA, 100 GBC Drive, Mailstop 514, Newark, Delaware 19702, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IEcgonine (9180)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
II
 The company plans to produce the listed controlled substances in bulk to be used in the manufacture of reagents and drug calibrator controls which are DEA exempt products. In reference to drug code 7370 the company plans to bulk manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. Dated: January 9, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01315 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P