alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1814 

To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum available for 

use by rural and smaller carriers in order to expand wireless coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. KINZINGER (for himself and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum 

available for use by rural and smaller carriers in order 

to expand wireless coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Spectrum Acces5 sibility Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF LICENSES. 

7 Section 307 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

8 U.S.C. 307) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(g) EXTENSION OF LICENSES.— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1814 IH

1 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this 

3 subsection— 

4 ‘‘(i) the term ‘rural area’ means any 

5 area other than— 

6 ‘‘(I) an area described in clause 

7 (i) or (ii) of section 343(a)(13)(A) of 

8 the Consolidated Farm and Rural De9 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 

10 1991(a)(13)(A)); and 

11 ‘‘(II) a city, town, or incor12 porated area that has a population of 

13 greater than 20,000 inhabitants; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) the term ‘small carrier’ means a 

15 carrier with not more than 1,500 employ16 ees. 

17 ‘‘(B) CALCULATION OF NUMBER OF EM18 PLOYEES.—For purposes of subparagraph 

19 (A)(ii), the number of employees of a carrier 

20 shall be determined in accordance with section 

21 121.106 of title 13, Code of Federal Regula22 tions, or any successor thereto. 

23 ‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—Not later 

24 than 90 days after the date of enactment of the 

25 Rural Spectrum Accessibility Act of 2017, the ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:27 Apr 04, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1814.IH H1814

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1814 IH

1 mission shall establish a program under which a car2 rier that receives a license under this section may 

3 partition or disaggregate the license in order to 

4 make unused spectrum available to small carriers or 

5 carriers to serve rural areas. 

6 ‘‘(3) EXTENSION OF LICENSE TERM.—Any car7 rier that receives a license under this section and 

8 participates in the program established under para9 graph (2) shall receive a 3-year extension of the li10 cense granted under this section.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Fire Environment Determination in the LaSalle Nuclear Power Plant Control Room (NUREG/CR-5037, BNL-NUREG-52106)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5037 (PDF - 1.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1987**Date Published:**October 1987 

**Prepared by:** John L. Usher and John L. Boccio Reliability and Physical Analysis Group Department of Nuclear Energy Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973 Under Contract No. DE-AC02-76CH00016

**Prepared for:** Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC FIN A-3252

Availability Notice

## Abstract

One of the objectives of the Fire Protection Research Program (FPRP) of the U.S. NRC is to improve the modeling of environments caused by fires in typical nuclear power plant enclosures. A three-dimensional fluid dynamics computer code (PHOENICS) has been adapted as a field-model fire code (SAFFIRE) for this purpose. The model has been applied to simulate two distinct fires in the control room of the LaSalle County power plant. The environments determined illustrate hazardous potential for both personnel and equipment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1128 

CA 13-00511 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

ANDREW PRESTIGIACOMO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUNE N. AMES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

BARBARA SPRINGER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

 

MOYER AND RUSSI, P.C., WEBSTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (CURTIS A. JOHNSON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig

J. Doran, A.J.), entered August 3, 2012. The order granted the motion

of a group of defendants, who are identified as the “Canandaigua Lake

Rights Defendants,” to dismiss the complaint against them and denied

the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this action to quiet title in connection with an

easement, plaintiff appeals from an order that granted the motion of a

group of defendants, who are identified as the “Canandaigua Lake

Rights Defendants” (defendants), to dismiss the complaint against them

and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. Contrary to

plaintiff’s contention, we conclude that Supreme Court properly

granted defendants’ motion inasmuch as it was based on documentary

evidence, i.e., a deed, conclusively establishing a defense to

plaintiff’s complaint as a matter of law (see CPLR 3211 [a] [1];

Thirty One Dev., LLC v Cohen, 104 AD3d 1195, 1196; see generally

Camperlino v Town of Manlius Mun. Corp., 78 AD3d 1674, 1676, lv

dismissed 17 NY3d 734; Blangiardo v Horstmann, 32 AD3d 876, 879, lv

dismissed 8 NY3d 939). In opposition, plaintiff failed to assert any

ground to defeat defendants’ motion. In particular, plaintiff failed

to raise a question of fact that the language of the deed with respect

to the easement contains conditions subsequent that resulted in

reversion or forfeiture of the grant of the easement (see Stratis v

Doyle, 176 AD2d 1096, 1098; Koshian v Kirchner, 139 AD2d 942, 943;

Fausett v Guisewhite, 16 AD2d 82, 86-87). Plaintiff’s cross motion

for summary judgment seeking a ruling that the easement is, inter

alia, “no longer legally valid” was premature (see CPLR 3212 [a]) and, 
-2- 1128 

CA 13-00511 

in any event, lacked merit.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 82-6016.

#### Heaton *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,431,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       177,000
<INVENTORY>                                     16,439,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,845,000
<PP&E>                                           4,854,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,273,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,194,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,915,000
<BONDS>                                         19,074,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           372,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,833,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,194,000
<SALES>                                         10,727,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,727,000
<CGS>                                            7,657,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,657,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,581,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,356,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,867,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,871,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,871,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.75)


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1920 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 

customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 

the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2017 

Mr. UPTON (for himself, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. SHIMKUS, Ms. 

DEGETTE, and Mr. TIBERI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to exclude customary prompt pay discounts from 

manufacturers to wholesalers from the average sales 

price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1920 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CUSTOMARY PROMPT PAY DIS2 COUNTS FROM MANUFACTURERS TO WHOLE3 SALERS FROM THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE 

4 FOR MEDICARE PAYMENTS FOR DRUGS AND 

5 BIOLOGICALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1847A(c)(3) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3a(c)(3)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘(other 

9 than customary prompt pay discounts extended to 

10 wholesalers)’’ after ‘‘prompt pay discounts’’; and 

11 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘(other 

12 than customary prompt pay discounts extended to 

13 wholesalers)’’ after ‘‘other price concessions’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to the calculation of the average 

16 sales price for calendar quarters beginning more than 90 

17 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4 (NUREG-1759)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No: I-19-023 September 5, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Schedules Conference on Spent Nuclear Fuel Management

An NRC conference on spent nuclear fuel management topics will be held Sept. 17-18 in 

King of Prussia, Pa. The conference will be open to the public.

More than 200 participants are expected to attend the gathering, which will take place at the 

Crowne Plaza Philadelphia Hotel, 260 Mall Blvd. The conference will run from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. on 

Sept. 17, and from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Sept. 18. On Sept. 16, the NRC will also hold an open 

house for attendees from 6-8 p.m. in the lobby of the NRC Region I Office, 2100 Renaissance 

Blvd., King of Prussia.

The NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards’ Division of Spent Fuel 

Management is organizing the conference. It is the division’s annual engagement with the public 

and industry to share the latest developments in the area of spent nuclear fuel and to hear from 

stakeholders regarding the future of spent fuel management.

Topics will include spent fuel licensing, aging management, extended storage and 

transportation, stakeholder perspectives, inspections, and operating experiences.

Those interested in attending the conference can register on the NRC’s website. The 

preliminary agenda is also available.
Ex. 99.4

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     In connection with the annual report of Stelmar Shipping Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.



/s/ Stamatis Molaris
--------------------
Stamatis Molaris

Chief Financial Officer







02509.0004 #491153
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
              Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gordon Quick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Daleen Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)      the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2003
         (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

(2)      the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2003




/s/ GORDON QUICK
-------------------------------------
Gordon Quick
President and Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having
been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Foothills Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) that:
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  April 30, 2007 |   | By:         /s/ Dennis B. Tower                          

Name:   Dennis B. TowerTitle:     Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District 

Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 4, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro 

Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s 

margin order denying his motion for lack of personal 

jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Computer-Based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance (NUREG/CR-6634)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6634 (PDF - 8.69 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2000**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** J. M. O'Hara, J. C. Higgins, W. F. Stubler/BNL J. Kramer/NRC

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

J. Kramer, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J6012

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Plant procedures are instructions to guide operators in monitoring, decision making, and controlling nuclear power plants. While plant procedures historically have been paper-based, computer-based procedures (CBPs) are being developed to support procedure use. CBPs have a range of capabilities that may support operators and reduce demands associated with paper procedures. The objective of this study was to establish human factors review guidance for CBP systems based on a technically valid methodology. While the study mainly addressed emergency operating procedures, much of the guidance developed applies to other types of procedures. First, a CBP characterization was developed for describing their key design features including both procedure representation and functionality. Then, the research on CBPs and related areas was reviewed. This information provided the technical basis on which the guidelines for design review were developed. The review guidelines address both the design process and the implementation of CBP systems. For some aspects of CBPs the technical basis was insufficient to develop guidance; these aspects were identified as issues to be addressed in future research.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
ex10_8f8k09162010.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 



LOAN EXTENSION AGREEMENT







Party A            :           Liu Lu (刘璐)(Identity Card no.:130203197805150323)


Party B            :           China INSOnline Corp.


Party C            :           Ever Trend Investment Limited(德祥投资有限公司)


 


Whereas Ever Trend Investment Limited is 100% owned subsidiary of China INSOnline Corp.;


 


Whereas Party B and Party C have borrowed a series of loans in total amount of USD374,445 from Party A during the period from September 16, 2010 to December 20, 2010, which are summarized as below:


 



	
Date of borrowing

	
Borrower

	
Amount of loan

	
Due date


	
Sep 16, 2010

	
Ever Trend Investment Limited

	
USD100,500

	
Dec 31, 2010


	
Oct 10, 2010

	
Ever Trend Investment Limited

	
USD40,000

	
Dec 31, 2010


	
Oct 16, 2010

	
China INSOnline Corp.

	
USD100,000

	
Dec 31, 2010


	
Nov 04, 2010

	
China INSOnline Corp.

	
USD98,623

	
Dec 31, 2010


	
Dec 01, 2010

	
China INSOnline Corp.

	
USD10,000

	
Dec 31, 2010


	
Dec 20, 2010

	
China INSOnline Corp.

	
USD25,322

	
Jun 30, 2011







 


In consideration of friendly negotiation, all Party A, Party B and Party C agree the terms as below:







 


1.              Due date of the repayment of all loans extend to June 30, 2011;


 


2.              All other terms of original agreements of above loans have no change;


 


3.              If there is any discrepancy with the loan agreements between Party A and Party B, and/or between Party A and Party C, this Agreement prevail;


 


4.              This Agreement is in triplicate and each party has one.


 


5.              This Agreement is effective from the date of execution.


 







 


Party A:


 


Liu Lu (刘璐)


 







 


/s/ Liu Lu


 







 


Party B:


 


China INSOnline Corp.


 







 


/s/Wang Zhenyu


 







 


Party C:


 


Ever Trend Investment Limited


 


(德祥投资有限公司)


 







 


/s/Wang Zhenyu


 







 


December 23, 2010
AAM-10-324-E Jul 15 2010

Exemption No. 9782A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0710

Mr. Dale Woods Designated Employer Representative JAARS, Inc.

P.O. Box 248 Waxhaw, NC 28173

Dear Mr. Woods:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9782. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 1, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of JAARS, Inc. (JAARS), for an extension of Exemption No. 9782. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows JAARS which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to JAARS.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9782 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of JAARS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the JAARS part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9782 to November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9782 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9782.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon