alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 152 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to recognize the historical 

importance of Prince Hall Freemasonry, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to recognize 

the historical importance of Prince Hall Freemasonry, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prince Hall Free5 masonry Stamp Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) Prince Hall Freemasonry was founded by 

9 Prince Hall on March 6, 1775; 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 152 IH

1 (2) Hall and fourteen other men of color were 

2 rejected by colonial Freemasonry due to their race; 

3 (3) the group was later initiated into Masonry 

4 through a military lodge created during the Amer5 ican Revolutionary War, but were later denied ad6 mission to Lodges in the United States after the 

7 war; 

8 (4) Prince Hall Freemasonry was founded on 

9 ideals of equality, liberty and peace; and 

10 (5) Prince Hall Masons are the oldest and larg11 est group of Masons of African origin in the world. 

12 SEC. 3. PRINCE HALL FREEMASONRY STAMP. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to the recognize the his14 torical importance of Prince Hall Freemasonry, the Post15 master General shall provide for the issuance of a forever 

16 stamp suitable for that purpose that depicts the logo of 

17 Prince Hall Freemasonry. 

18 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

19 ‘‘forever stamp’’ means a definitive stamp which meets the 

20 postage required for first-class mail up to one ounce in 

21 weight, and which retains full validity for that purpose 

22 even if the rate of that postage is later increased. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 152 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The stamp described in sub2 section (a) shall be issued beginning as soon as practicable 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
PLANET ZANETT, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
EXHIBIT 21.1

                   Subsidiaries of Planet Zanett, Inc.

The following list includes all consolidated subsidiaries of Planet
Zanett, Inc. as of December 31, 2002.


                                                State of Incorporation
                                                ----------------------
Back Bay Technologies, Inc.                            Delaware
Brandywine Computer Group, Inc.                        Delaware
Planet Zanett Corporate Incubator, Inc.                Delaware
Planet Zanett Asset Management, Inc.                   Delaware
GlobeDrive.com, Inc.                                   Delaware
Planet Zanett Angel Fund, LLP                          Delaware
#### In the Matter of Vincent S. Tracy, an Attorney.

[632 NYS2d 991]

Order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f). Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ. (Filed Sept. 27, 1995.)
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1743 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a candidate 

for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from 

accepting contributions from any political committee other than an authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership 

PAC. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself and Mr. KHANNA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit a candidate for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from accepting contributions from any political committee other than an 

authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership PAC. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No PAC Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1743 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 

2 FROM PACS BY CANDIDATES FOR REP3 RESENTATIVE OR SENATOR. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 315 of the Federal Elec5 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(k) PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN POLIT8 ICAL COMMITTEES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM

10 PACS.—A candidate for election for the office of 

11 Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi12 dent Commissioner to, the Congress, may not accept 

13 a contribution with respect to the election from any 

14 political committee other than an authorized com15 mittee of the candidate. 

16 ‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF LEADERSHIP PAC.—A 

17 candidate for election for the office of Senator or 

18 Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis19 sioner to, the Congress may not establish a leader20 ship PAC (as defined in subparagraph (B) of section 

21 304(i)(8)).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur24 ring after 2018. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Argued and submitted March 31, judgment vacated;

appeal dismissed June 23, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RICHARD C. PATTERSON, *Appellant.*

(90P-3095; CA A72409)

854 P2d 1006

Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*422PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he was resentenced. Defendant originally pled guilty to a charge of delivery of a controlled substance as part of a drug delivery scheme, ORS 475.992, and was sentenced according to grid block 8-H. He abandoned his appeal from the conviction and filed a petition for *habeas corpus*relief on the ground that the “scheme or network” conviction was invalid. The *habeas corpus*court granted the petition, vacated the original sentence and remanded for resentencing. The state appealed that ruling. While the state’s appeal was pending, defendant was resentenced by the original trial court according to grid block 4-H and filed this appeal.

The state’s appeal from the *habeas corpus*judgment deprived the trial court of jurisdiction. Because the amended judgment was entered when the trial court had no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal.

Judgment vacated; appeal dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Reexamination of Spent Fuel Shipment Risk Estimates – Main Report (NUREG/CR-6672)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6672 (PDF - 19.91 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2000**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** J.L. Sprung, D.J. Ammerman, N.L. Breivik, R.J. Dukart, F.L. Kanipe, J.A. Koski, G.S. Mills, K.S. Neuhauser, H.D. Radloff, R.F. Weiner, H.R. Yoshimura

Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-0744

**Prepared for:** Spent Fuel Project Office Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J5160

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The risks associated with the transport of spent nuclear fuel by truck and rail are reexamined and compared to results published in NUREG-0170 and the Modal Study. The reexamination considers transport by truck and rail in four generic Type B spent fuel casks. Cask and spent fuel response to collision impacts and fires are evaluated by performing three-dimensional finite element and one-dimensional heat transport calculations. Accident release fractions are developed by critical review of literature data. Accident severity fractions are developed from Modal Study truck and rail accident event trees, modified to reflect the frequency of occurrence of hard and soft rock wayside route surfaces as determined by analysis of geographic data. Incident-free population doses and the population dose risks associated with the accidents that might occur during transport are calculated using the RADTRAN 5 transportation risk code. The calculated incident-free doses are compared to those published in NUREG-0 170. The calculated accident dose risks are compared to dose risks calculated using NUREG-0170 and Modal Study accident source terms. The comparisons demonstrate that both of these studies made a number of very conservative assumptions about spent fuel and cask response to accident conditions, which caused their estimates of accident source terms, accident frequencies, and accident consequences to also be very conservative. The results of this study and the previous studies demonstrate that the risks associated with the shipment of spent fuel by truck or rail are very small.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Eufaula Municipal Aiport, Eufaula, Oklahoma, Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA published a document in the Federal Register of 
December 5, 2014, concerning request for comments on the release of 
land at Eufaula Municipal Airport under the provisions of Section 125 
of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for the 21st 
Century (AIR 21). The document contained the incorrect state.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Franklin, 817-222-5634

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 5, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-28562, 
on page 1, in the Notice title, correct the Notice title to read: 
Notice of Intent to Rule on Request to Release Airport Property at 
Eufaula Municipal Airport, EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.

    Dated: January 8, 2015,
Edward N. Agnew,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-00996 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Licensing Support Network forDocuments Relating to the Yucca Mountain Licensing Proceeding Conducted by theU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/BR-0301, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Overview

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0301, Revision 1 (PDF - 903.44 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**June 2004

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Overview

The Licensing Support Network (LSN) is an electronic system, which was established by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and is operated by the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel. Its purpose is to provide free Internet access to documents that may be used as evidence in the NRC's review process and associated licensing proceedings associated with the application that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted to seek authorization to construct a high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. As such, the LSN is the single place where the parties and potential parties to the licensing hearing can search for materials from any/all of the parties' documentary collections in a uniform way.

This brochure provides an overview of the LSN and answers related questions, including who may enter documents, who may use the LSN, how to use the system, where access to the LSN is available. In addition, this brochure presents several additional sources of help in navigating and using the LSN; obtaining copies of documents; and reporting problems, making recommendations, or offering comments. The NRC also encourages interested parties to visit the LSN Web site at www.lsnnet.gov, and welcomes ideas for improving that site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 86-1025.

#### In re Polyak.

C. A. 6th Cir. Petition for writ of common-law certiorari denied.
SEI~VED AUGUST 22, 2012 

,. --··· · RP ln1T OF · . '.i:J 1

/\ '1 i lV Ct~ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT~QN\!SPOHTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' \ .. ,!<IT OPERAT!Ol\)S 

WASHINGTON, DC 

_____________ :UJ.IDJl 23 ;.'\ CJ: IS 

IN THE MATTER OF 

KALITTA AIR, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012-0782 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011GL230099) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

.,\ p.. 

./. 

·-<'' onnie A. Yoder 

ChiefAdministrative Law 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration , 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

George W. Kelsey, Respondent's Counsel · 

Kalitta Air, LLC 

2395 S. Huron Parkway, Suite 200 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

TEL: 734-973-1222 

FAX: 734-973-1223 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 600 18-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S:E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 · 

. TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0782 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or; by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · · 

-2-
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZoranCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| Dated:  August 9, 2007 |   | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                     |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   | Levy Gerzberg                         |   |   |
|                        |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                             |        |                                       |        |        |  |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Dock A. Mack, Petitioner, v D. Ryan, as Lieutenant of Southport Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 546]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order .of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating disciplinary rules prohibiting the refusal of a direct order, verbal interference with an employee, the refusal of staff directions relating to movement and the misuse of State property as the result of an incident in which he was uncooperative with correction officers who were attempting to escort him to recreation. We reject petitioner’s argument that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. The misbehavior report, prepared by the correction officer who had difficulty with petitioner, as well as the testimony of another correction officer who witnessed the event, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination. Accordingly, the determination is confirmed.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Engineering Characterization of Ground Motion: Task II: Summary Report (NUREG/CR-3805, Volume 5)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3805, Volume 5 (PDF - 5.23 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 1986**Date Published:** August 1986

**Prepared by:** M.S. Power, C.-Y. Chang, I.M. Idriss, Woodward-Clyde Consultants R.P. Kennedy, Structural Mechanics Associates, Inc.

Woodward-Clyde Consultants Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Structural Mechanics Associates, Inc. Newport Beach, CA 92660

 NRC Job Code B6680

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the results of part of a two-task study on the engineering characterization of earthquake ground motion for nuclear power plant design. The overall objective of this research program sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) is to develop recommendations for methods for selecting design response spectra or acceleration time histories to be used to characterize motion at the foundation level of nuclear power plants.

Task I of the study, which is presented in Vol. 1 of NUREG/CR-3805, developed a basis for selecting design response spectra taking into account the characteristics of free-field ground motion found to be significant in causing structural damage. Task II incorporates additional considerations of effects of spatial variations of ground motions and soil-structure interaction on foundation motions and strutural response. The results of Task II are presented in Vols. 2 through 5 of NUREG/CR-3805 as follows: Vol. 2, effects of ground motion characteristics on structural response considering localized structural nonlinearities and soil-structure interaction effects; Vol. 3, observational data on spatial variations of earthquake ground motions; Vol. 4, soil-structure interaction effects on structural response; and Vol. 5, summary based on Tasks I and II studies. This report presents the results of the Vol. 5 studies.

This study was conducted under Contract No. NRC 04-80-192 with the USNRC. Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC) was the prime contractor for the project. Project Subcontractors were Structural Mechanics Associates, Newport Beach, California, Structural and Earthquake Engineering Consultants, Inc., Sierra Madre, California, Interpacific Technology, Inc., Oakland, California, and NCT Engineering, Inc., Lafayette, California.

Project Consultants, W. 3. Hall of the University of Illinois, Champaign, J. E. Luco of the University of California, San Diego, J. M. Roesset of the University of Texas, Austin, H. B. Seed of the University of California, Berkeley, and N. C. Tsai of NCT Engineering, Inc., Lafayette, California, provided a detailed review of a draft of the report:and made many valuable comments. J. F. Costello provided overall technical guidance and review as the technical representative of the USNRC for this research project.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices1998

# Change Notice 98-013

Issue Date: 09/14/98IM001

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL PIPB

 

----

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 17, 2020
No. 91-6347.

#### Perez Bustillo *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 90-6172.

#### Wakelin et al. *v.*Gulino.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: May 2 , 2005