alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby                           ( print page 94781)                        gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 478 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-477, K2025-474.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27943 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
   1. Employment:
 Service as President and Chief Executive Officer
 Service on Boards of Directors
 2. Term:
 3. Full Time Employment:




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
   4. Compensation:
 Base Salary:
 Annual Incentive Bonus:
   2




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
   Long-Term Incentive:
   5. Expenses:
 6. Benefits:
 General
 Life Insurance
 Directors and Officers Insurance
 3




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  7. Place of Employment:
 8. Executives Covenants:
 Confidential Information
 Existence of Confidential Information
 Protection of Confidential Information
 Confidentiality Obligations to Third Parities
 4




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
 Required Disclosures
 Assistance with Regard to Intellectual Property Rights
 Delivery of Records, Etc
 Non-Solicitation/Non-Hire
 Non-Competition
 5




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  9. Intellectual Property Developed by Executive.
 Ownership of Intellectual Property
 Waiver of Credit
 10. Non-Disparagement:
 6




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  11. Termination:
 Death of Executive
 Disability of the Executive
 7




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
 
 Termination for Cause:
        8




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
    Termination by Company Without Cause or by Executive for Good
Reason
   9




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
           10




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  Resignation of Executive without Good Reason
 Sole Compensation to Executive because of Termination
 11




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  12. Effect of Change of Control
 13. Governing Law.
 Governing Law
 Arbitration
 Claims not Subject to Arbitration
 12




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
 Right
to Injunction
 14. Benefit
of the Agreement
 15. Assignment:
 The
Company
 The
Executive
 16. Miscellaneous:
 No
Conflict
 Legal
Fees
 Cooperation
   13




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
  Entire Agreement:
 Amendment:
 Severability:
 Construction:
 Notices:
 14




---



##### 



(ATARI LOGO)
    
    Execution Copy
 Insurance and Indemnification:
   Counterparts:
 ATARI, INC.By:
    
    (-s- BRUNO BONNELL)
    
    
    
    9/1/2006Bruno  Bonnell
    
    
    
    DateChairman of the Board &Chief Creative OfficerACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:By:
    
    (-s- DAVID PIERCE)
    
    
    
    9/1/2006David Pierce
    
    
    
    Date
 15
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZoranCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Karl Schneider, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.
| Dated:  August 9, 2007 |   | /s/ Karl Schneider                 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | Karl Schneider                     |
|                        |   | Senior Vice President, Finance and |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer            |

 

----
Specimen Common Stock certificate.



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

 

 

  
 INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
  
 No. 
 Shares 

 
 SAGENT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share 

 
 SEE REVERSE OF THIS CERTIFICATE FOR
RESTRICTIVE LEGENDS 
  

SAGENT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (HEREINAFTER
CALLED THE “COMPANY”), TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE COMPANY IN
PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY, UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE
PROPERLY ENDORSED. THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY, ARE ISSUED
AND SHALL BE HELD SUBJECT TO ALL OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, AS AMENDED, AND THE BYLAWS, AS AMENDED, OF
THE COMPANY (COPIES OF WHICH ARE ON FILE WITH THE COMPANY AND
WITH THE TRANSFER AGENT), TO ALL OF WHICH EACH HOLDER, BY ACCEPTANCE
HEREOF, ASSENTS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED
BY THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR. 
  

DAY MONTH Year 

 
 , SECRETARY ,
PRESIDENT
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of the Propagation of Pressure Waves in Piping Systems with RELAP5/MOD 3.2.2: Comparison of Computed and Measured Results (NUREG/IA-0206)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0206 (PDF - 2.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**June 2007

**Prepared by:**Jürgen Perlia, Wolfgang MünchTÜV SÜDSection Thermo- and FluiddynamicsWestendstraße 199D-80686 Munich, Germany

M.B. Rubin, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as Part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the International Code Assessment and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by**:Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The present paper demonstrates the suitability of the computer code RELAP5/MOD 3.2.2 to describe the propagation of pressure waves in piping systems.

First of all a pressure wave in a simple straight pipe was analyzed with RELAP5. The results of the computation were compared with the outcomes we obtained with the computer code DWELL. DWELL is an in-house development based on the method of characteristics. The results of both codes showed a very good agreement.

Further we analyzed the following two transients for a 1200 MWe PWR-plant:
> 
• turbine trip• shutting down of a feed water pump

In both cases, pressure versus time was recorded at several positions of the piping system concerned. The measured pressure signal curves were compared with the results of post test calculations performed with RELAP5.

A comparison of the results showed a good agreement and proved that RELAP5 is able to solve pressure wave problems.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 153 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor the work of Dr. 

Michael Ellis DeBakey, who helped develop the mobile army surgical 

hospital, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor 

the work of Dr. Michael Ellis DeBakey, who helped 

develop the mobile army surgical hospital, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michael E. DeBakey 

5 Stamp Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 153 IH

1 (1) Dr. Michael E. DeBakey was widely consid2 ered to be one of the greatest surgeons ever, accord3 ing to the Journal of the American Medical Associa4 tion; 

5 (2) his surgical inventions, such as the roller 

6 pump, which is a component of the heart-lung ma7 chine used in open-heart surgery, continue to save 

8 countless lives; 

9 (3) Dr. DeBakey’s surgical innovations, for ex10 ample the use of Dacron grafts for damaged arte11 ries, revolutionized the practice of medicine nation12 ally and globally; 

13 (4) his commitment to military medicine helped 

14 shape the creation of the mobile army surgical hos15 pital or MASH unit, and a medical program for re16 turning veterans; and 

17 (5) Dr. DeBakey was consulted regarding the 

18 health of several world leaders, including President 

19 Boris N. Yeltsin during the cold war. 

20 SEC. 3. MICHAEL E. DEBAKEY STAMP. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to honor the work of Dr. 

22 Michael Ellis DeBakey, who helped develop the mobile 

23 army surgical hospital, the Postmaster General shall pro24 vide for the issuance of a forever stamp suitable for that 

25 purpose that depicts Dr. Michael E. DeBakey. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 153 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

2 ‘‘forever stamp’’ means a definitive stamp which meets the 

3 postage required for first-class mail up to one ounce in 

4 weight, and which retains full validity for that purpose 

5 even if the rate of that postage is later increased. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The stamp described in sub7 section (a) shall be issued beginning as soon as practicable 

8 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2006

January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
FIRST DIVISION

BARNES, P. J.,

MERCIER and BROWN, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN

THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES.

August 20, 2021

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A19A0689. QUYNN v. HULSEY et al.

MERCIER, Judge.

In Quynn v. Hulsey, 310 Ga. 473 (850 SE2d 725) (2020), the Supreme Court

of Georgia reversed Division 3 of our unpublished opinion in Quynn v. Hulsey, 350

Ga. App. XXVI (Case No. A19A0689) (June 21, 2019). Accordingly, we vacate

Division 3 of our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own,

and reverse the trial court’s grant of partialsummary judgment to TriEst on the claims

of negligent entrustment, hiring, retention and supervision. Divisions 1 and 2 of our

opinion were not affected by the Supreme Court’s decision and thus remain in effect.

See Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563-564 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001).

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Barnes, P. J., and Brown, J.,

concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,491
<SECURITIES>                                    12,908
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,025
<INVENTORY>                                        736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,769
<PP&E>                                           9,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,244
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,726
<SALES>                                         12,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,319
<CGS>                                            6,004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                       564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-10915 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

GARY L. POTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS
THE COUNTY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,
Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1124-H)

______________________________________________________ January 6, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for

the reasons stated in the district court's careful memorandum
opinion and order of June 24, 1998.

AFFIRMED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Correlation of Seismic Performance in Similar SSCs (Structures, Systems, and Components) (NUREG/CR-7237)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7237 (PDF – 2.95 MB)  *

* Appendix D refers to MATHCAD and PDF attachments with sample calculations.  Those desiring the files with those sample calculations can order the CD by contacting: DISTRIBUTION.Resource@nrc.gov.

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2015**Date Published:** December 2017

**Prepared by:** Robert J. Budnitz1, Gregory S. Hardy2, David L. Moore3, and M. K. Ravindra4

1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Energy Geosciences Division University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

2 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger 4695 MacArthur Court Newport Beach, CA 92660

3 David L. Moore Consulting 9721 SE 43rd Street Mercer Island, WA 98040

4 MK Ravindra Consulting 15 Fortuna West Irvine, CA 92620

Jose Pires, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes an improved and more refined and insightful methodology for analysis of correlation or dependency as part of the overall methodology of seismic PRA (SPRA) for nuclear power plants. The focus is on those classes of structures, systems, or components (SSCs) for which the way correlations or dependencies are analyzed in SPRA makes an important difference to the SPRA results or to the safety insights derived from those results. The fundamental question is what is the joint probability of seismic-caused failure of two or more SSCs conditional on the occurrence of an earthquake of a given size, and how and why that joint probability may be different from the situation in which those failures are essentially independent. An improved and more refined and insightful methodology is identified and presented, its rationale is explained, and examples are provided to demonstrate how the methodology can be used in practice.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
_.- . -. L OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

### aue8fe?ram8uBlulsFyltBftoexoeeu

moo.ooPer~~ xuwtablutoflnueny 8peouiO rtetuteulrootirsg

.a0 psysmat

to the l'Il8triat 

### Attorney otherchrn

laUiart.U

in the above gmteU Arttab. I do iSaul, hcuovor, YoPy QJoclfio

ia8truotlauwith lafdbremce to tho pWnm3at

of tlm dirtdab WSmrnay io cowitier of 355,000



### or war, 08 provi&uS by Artiole 39lsb,sec. 1. %t&r the pr8aost ayaoa~u set ap by our mulltcr,trur

orldnal dirtr~at

rttomey

~~~~~~~~~~~ aa&leef&lliaDIPLItlIutLtw8lubepa8ulble Artlo ~lR&l, V*mon’r Awmteeu 65*231 Rt8tlate8 INma a8 iollum,--APPROVmm 21, 1941 . AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Aging Assessment of Safety-Related Fuses Used in Low- and Medium- Voltage Applications in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6763)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6763 (PDF 4.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2002**Date Published:** March 2002

**Prepared by:** R. Lofaro, M. Villaran

Brookhaven National Laboratory Energy Sciences and Technology Department Upton, NY 11973-5000

D. Nguyen, NRC Technical Monitor

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J2831

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An aging assessment of safety-related fuses used in commercial nuclear power plants has been performed to determine if aging degradation is a concern for these components in older nuclear power plants. This study is based on the review and analysis of past operating experience, as reported in the Licensee Event Report database, the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and the Equipment Performance and Information Exchange System database. In addition, documents prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that identify significant issues or concerns related to fuses have been reviewed, and one fuse manufacturer was visited to obtain their insights. Based on the results of the aforementioned reviews, predominant aging characteristics are identified and potential condition monitoring techniques are discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 91-757.

#### B. E. Rock Corp., dba Rainbow *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.