alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Value/Impact Analyses of Accident Preventive and Mitigative Options for Spent Fuel Pools (NUREG/CR-5281, BNL-NUREG-52180)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5281 (PDF - 6.21 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1989**Date Published:**March 1989

**Prepared by:** J.H. Jo, P.F. Rose, S.D. Unwin, V.L. Sailor,  K.R. Perkins, A.G. Tingle Reliability and Physical Analysis Group Department of Nuclear Energy Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

**Prepared for:**Division of Safety Issue Resolution Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC FIN A-3963 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A series of value/impact studies were performed for accident preventive and mitigative options intended to reduce the risks posed by the storage of spent fuel at nuclear power plants in spent fuel storage pools. Options studied included limited low-density reracking of spent fuel, installation of water sprays above the spent fuel pool, and the installation of redundant cooling and/or makeup systems. The results of these studies indicated that the measures were in general not likely to be cost effective. The reason for this is due to both the low likelihood of a spent fuel pool accident that could result in a significant radiological release and the high cost of proposed modifications. These insights are largely contingent upon compliance with guidelines developed for licensees to assure the safe handling of heavy loads in the vicinity of spent fuel pools thus reducing the likelihood of the structural failure of the pool and rapid loss of water inventory due to a cask drop event.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

AMENDMENTS TO THE

ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2010

GLOBAL STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

ADOPTED JANUARY 12, 2011

 

1.              Section 2(g) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(g) “Committee” shall mean the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board or any successor committee or subcommittee of the Board, which committee is comprised solely of two or more persons who are outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C)(i) of the Code and the applicable regulations and nonemployee directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act.

 

2.              Section 2(h) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(h) “Company” shall mean Tyco Electronics Ltd., a Swiss company, or any successor thereto.

 

3.              Section 2(k) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(k) “Eligible Person” shall mean any employee, officer or non-employee Director providing services to the Company or an Affiliate whom the Committee determines to be an Eligible Person; provided however, that any employee, officer or non-employee Director who was employed by or providing services to Tyco Electronics Ltd. or an Affiliate immediately prior to the close of the tender offer made by Tyco Electronics Ltd. to purchase the outstanding shares of common stock of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. shall be excluded from consideration as an Eligible Person hereunder.  An Eligible Person must be a natural person.

 

4.              Section 2(m) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(m) “Fair Market Value” of a Share shall mean the closing sales price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date as of which the determination of Fair Market Value is being made or, if no sale is reported for such day, on the next preceding day on which a sale of Shares was reported.

 

1











 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Fair Market Value of a Share will in no event be determined to be less than par value.

 

5.              Section 2(cc) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(cc) “Shares” shall mean shares of common stock of the Company or such other securities or property as may become subject to Awards pursuant to an adjustment made under Section 4(c) of the Plan.

 

6.              Section 9(f) of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

(f) Governing Law.  The Plan and all determinations made and actions taken under the Plan will be governed by the law of Switzerland and construed accordingly.

 

2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before March 30, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart, R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on May 20, 2014, Mallinckrodt LLC, 3600 North Second Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
ILisdexamfetamine (1205)
II
 The company plans to manufacturer bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for distribution and product development to its customers. Dated: January 21, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01576 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56864-56865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23546]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7583]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Caravaggio and His Followers in Rome''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of

[[Page 56865]]

October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Caravaggio and His Followers in Rome,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Kimbell Art 
Museum, Fort Worth, Texas, from on or about October 16, 2011, until on 
or about January 8, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 8, 2011.
Lee A. Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-23546 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00821-CV

Larry LANGSTON,

Appellant

v.

Tom HAYDEN and Shirley Hayden,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CV-0211

Honorable Bill Squires, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 29, 2020

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by February 6, 2020. Neither the brief nor a motion 

for extension of time was filed. By order dated March 11, 2020, appellant was ordered to show 

cause in writing by March 26, 2020, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to this court’s order. Because 

appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.1


 


Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers of Tompkins Financial Corporation


 


The three major components of the Company’s executive officer compensation are (i) base salary, (ii) annual bonus and (iii) long-term, equity based incentive awards. Following is a description of the compensation arrangements that were approved by the Independent Directors at the January 25, 2011, meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, for the Company’s Named Executive Officers, which officers were determined by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A, filed April 7, 2010..


 


Annual Bonus


 


Cash award bonus payments for performance in fiscal 2010:


 



	
Stephen S. Romaine

	 	$	165,000.00	 
	
James W. Fulmer

	 	$	80,400.00	 
	
Francis M. Fetsko

	 	$	68,000.00	 
	
Gerald J. Klein, Jr.

	 	$	57,600.00	 
	
Gregory J. Hartz

	 	$	61,500.00	 





 


The foregoing bonuses will be paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Compensation Committee considers a number of quantitative and qualitative performance factors to evaluate the performance of its Named Executive Officers. These performance factors include, but are not limited to: (i) achievement of individual goals; (ii) contribution to business unit results; and (iii) contribution to corporate results measured by (a) the Company’s net income as compared to the Company’s internal targets, (b) increases in earnings per share of the Company’s common stock for the latest 12 months, (c) the Company’s return on assets, as ranked in the Federal Reserve Bank Holding Company Performance Report (Peer Group Percentile), (d) increases in the Company’s stock price over 12 months, and (e) the Company’s return on equity, as ranked in the Federal Reserve Bank Holding Company Performance Report (Peer Group percentile).
DENY and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00435-CV IN RE BRENDA L. CADDELL, Relator Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-13738 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek In her May 6, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relato r Brenda Caddell challenges the trial court’s (1) ruling sust aining the denial of her objection to the visiting judge, and (2) refusal to reconsider the enforcement motion that the visiting judge had denied. Entitlement to mandamus re lief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she l acks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc ., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)).–2– Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a).

Schenck, J., dissenting.
220435F.P05 /Amanda L. Reichek / AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1990

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International AgreementsExperimental Study of Narrow Pulse Effects on the Behavior of High Burnup Fuel Rods with Zr-1%Nb Cla

# Experimental Study of Narrow Pulse Effects onthe Behavior of High Burnup Fuel Rods with Zr-1%Nb Cladding and UO 2Fuel (VVER Type) under Reactivity-Initiated Accident Conditions: Program Approach andAnalysis of Results (NUREG/IA-0213, Volume 1, IRSN/DPAM 2005-275, NSI RRC KI-3230)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0213, Volume1 (PDF - 22.8 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**May 2006 

**Prepared by:** L. Yegorova, K. Lioutov, N. Jouravkova Nuclear Safety Institute of Russian Research Centre, "Kurchatov Institute" Kurchatov Square 1 Moscow 123182, Russian Federation

O. Nechaeva, A. Salatov A.A. Bochvar All-Russian Research Institute of Inorganic Materials Rogov Street 5 Moscow 123182, Russian Federation

V. Smirnov, A. Goryachev State Research Centre, "Research Institute of Atomic Reactors" Dimitrovgrad 433510, Russian Federation

 V. Ustinenko, I. Smirnov Russian Federal Nuclear Centre, "All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics" Sarov 607200, Russian Federation

**Prepared for:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (United States) Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (France) Joint Stock Company "TVEL" (Russian Federation)

**Published by:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Twelve pulse tests of fuel rods with UO2 high burnup fuel and Zr-1%Nb cladding were performed in the Russian research reactor, BIGR. Fuel rods were refabricated from Russian VVER pressurized water reactor commercial fuel elements with burnups of 47–49 MWd/kg U and 60 MWd/kg U. The reactor pulse tests were carried out to validate the behavior of high burnup fuel rods under reactivity-initiated-accident conditions. This experimental program, compared to previous investigations, was focused on the determining the sensitivity of the failure mechanisms and the failure thresholds of high burnup fuel to such effects as the narrow pulse (2.5–3.1 ms), ductile Zr-1%Nb cladding, fuel burnup with relatively small rim layer effects (47–49 MWd/kg U) and with relatively significant ones (60 MWd/kg U).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 36167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7472]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(a)(2), the Department of State announces 
a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take 
place on July 12, 2011, at the Department of State, Washington, DC.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that 
this Board meeting will be closed to the public in the interest of 
national defense and foreign policy because the Board will be reviewing 
and discussing matters classified in accordance with Executive Order 
13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with a 
continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms control, 
disarmament, political-military affairs, and international security and 
related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will 
include classified discussions related to the Board's ongoing studies 
on current U.S. policy and issues regarding arms control, international 
security, nuclear proliferation, and diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: June 13, 2011.
Richard W. Hartman, II.,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-15457 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
No. 90-6249.

#### Berry *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. D-607.

#### In re Disbarment of Eimers.

It is ordered that Robert F. Eimers, of Coconut Grove, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 33,976 4 BENJAMIN DIMAS, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Ross C. Sanchez, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Law Offices of the Public Defender 12 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VANZI, Judge. 192 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

__________________________________ 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_________________________________ 9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 12
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert Krebs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of TelePlus Enterprises, Inc.

Date:  March 31, 2005

                                        By:/s/ Robert Krebs
                                        --------------------------
                                               Robert Krebs
                                               Chief Financial Officer