alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Figueroa, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 331]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered October 15, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the essential elements of the second degree burglary charge were proven beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932). The complainant, who undisputedly knew defendant as an acquaintance from the neighborhood, testified that defendant was the intruder in the complainant’s apartment with whom he briefly struggled, and that the complainant’s stereo equipment had been relocated to the sofa and tied up in a sheet as an apparent prelude to its removal. The complainant’s sister testified that, although she initially had stayed in the hallway as her brother kicked open the bolted door, she entered in time to see *502the struggle with defendant, whom she also recognized from the neighborhood, and observed the stereo equipment tied up in a sheet. The jurors’ evaluation of the complainant’s and his sister’s testimony as credible is entitled to great deference *(People v Corporan,*169 AD2d 643, *lv denied*77 NY2d 959). Moreover, defendant’s statement to the police that he had been viewing a certain film in another part of town at the time of the burglary was controverted by the testimony of a movie theater usher that the film had not been shown that night at the theater defendant claimed to have visited. We have examined defendant’s alternative contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and find it to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
#### Peale *v.*Folsome.

At the pleading term, the Defendant pleaded *non est factum,*and conditions performed ; and afterwards at another term, the insolvent debtor’s act. *Mr. Hay*insisted, that, was intended as a plea *puis darrein continuance,*and that it was a waiver of the preceding pleas. Iv. was insisted on the other side, that it was not a plea *puis dar-rein continuance,*not having been so pleaded, nor entered on the reeoid as such. *Per curiam,*were it a plea *puis darrein continuance,*the plea of *non est factum*would he thereby waived, and you would have u« need to prove the execution of the. bond *;*but mil s« the other side will concede it to be a pica *puis darrein continuance,*the court cannot take it to be so. I( docs not purport in it self, nor by the entry of it on the record, to-be a plea of some new mat ter. arisen since the last continuance. It might Stave been, and probably was a plea added to the others by motion to the court, or by consent of the opposite party, as an original plea — a juror was withdrawn by consent.

*Note.*— Vide *Greer*v. *Sheppard, ante 96.*
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1916 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1916

     To ensure the ballistic missile defense capacity of the Army.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2017

 Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Austin Scott of 
 Georgia, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Turner, Mr. Moulton, 
 and Ms. Tsongas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To ensure the ballistic missile defense capacity of the Army.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patriot Inventory Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPACITY OF THE 
              ARMY.

    (a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2018 or any fiscal year 
thereafter for the Army may be obligated or expended to demilitarize 
any GEM-T interceptor or remove any such interceptor from the 
operational inventory of the Army until the date on which the Secretary 
of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees the 
evaluation conducted under subsection (b).
    (b) Evaluation.--The Secretary and the Chief of Staff of the Army 
shall jointly conduct an evaluation of the ability of the Army to meet 
warfighter requirements and operational needs if GEM-T interceptors are 
removed from the operational inventory of the Army. In conducting such 
evaluation, the Secretary and the Chief of Staff shall evaluate whether 
the Army can maintain an inventory of interceptors necessary to retain 
the capability provided by GEM-T interceptors and to meet such 
operational needs by either--
            (1) recertifying GEM-T interceptors (either with or without 
        modification); or
            (2) developing, testing, and fielding a new low-cost 
        interceptor that can be placed on the operational inventory of 
        the Army prior to the retirement of GEM-T interceptors.
    (c) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to 
activities that the Secretary determines are critical to the safety of 
GEM-T interceptors.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``congressional defense committees'' has the 
        meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, 
        United States Code.
            (2) The term ``GEM-T interceptor'' means the Patriot 
        guidance enhanced missile TBM.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,776
<SECURITIES>                                     8,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,755
<PP&E>                                          81,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,254
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,211
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,312
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,211
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1786 

To reduce the rate of pay for Members of Congress by 10 percent and 

to eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2017 

Mr. LOEBSACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce the rate of pay for Members of Congress by 

10 percent and to eliminate automatic pay adjustments 

for Members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Halt in 

5 Pay Increases and Cut Congressional Pay Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1786 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN PAY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a) of the Legislative 

3 Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501) is amended 

4 to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 601. (a) Effective as of the beginning of the 

6 first applicable pay period commencing after the date on 

7 which is held the next regularly scheduled general election 

8 for Federal office following the date of the enactment of 

9 the Congressional Halt in Pay Increases and Cut Congres10 sional Pay Act, the annual rate of pay for— 

11 ‘‘(1) each Senator, Member of the House of 

12 Representatives, and Delegate to the House of Rep13 resentatives, and the Resident Commissioner from 

14 Puerto Rico, 

15 ‘‘(2) the President pro tempore of the Senate, 

16 the majority leader and the minority leader of the 

17 Senate, and the majority leader and the minority 

18 leader of the House of Representatives, and 

19 ‘‘(3) the Speaker of the House of Representa20 tives, 

21 shall be equal to the annual rate of pay for that position 

22 as of the date on which such general election is held, re23 duced by 10 percent.’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef25 fect as of the date on which is held the next regularly 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1786 IH

1 scheduled general election for Federal office following the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 9, 2019

NO. 03-18-00538-CV

Language People, Inc. and Deaf Nation Enterprises, Inc., Appellants

v.

Joel Barish, Jed Barish, and DeafNation, Inc., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE;

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 17, 2018. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellants shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# PAVAN: An Atmospheric-Dispersion Program for Evaluating Design-Basis Accidental Releases of Radioactive Materials from Nuclear Power Stations (NUREG/CR-2858)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2858 (PDF - 1.49 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 1982**Data Published:** November 1982

**Prepared by:** T. J. Bander

Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

NRC FIN B2367

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems integration Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides a user's guide for the NRC computer program, PAVAN, which is a program used by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to estimate downwind ground-level air concentrations for potential accidental releases of radioactive material from nuclear facilities. Such an assessment is required by 10 CFR Part 100 and 10 CFR Part 50. The program implements the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.145, "Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Potential Accident Consequence Assessments at Nuclear Power Plants."

Using joint frequency distributions of wind direction and wind speed by atmospheric stability, the program provides relative air concentration (X/Q) values as functions of direction for various time periods at the exclusion area boundary (EAB) and the outer boundary of the low population zone (LPZ). Calculations of X/Q values can be made for assumed ground-level releases (e.g., through building penetrations and vents) or elevated releases from free-standing stacks.

Various options may be selected by the user. They can account for variation in the location of release points, additional plume dispersion due to building wakes, plume meander under low wind speed conditions, and adjustments to consider non-straight trajectories. It computes an effective plume height using the physical release height which can be reduced by inputted terrain features. It cannot handle multiple emission sources.

A description of the main program and all subroutines is provided. Also included as appendices are a complete listing of the program and two test cases with the required data inputs and the resulting program outputs.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Glass, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Megan, Trustee, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Sheldon & Freytag*of Elkhorn, attorneys, and *Laurence W. Hall*of Madison of counsel.

For the respondent: *John F. Baker*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Production and Testing of the VITAMIN-B7 Fine-Group and BUGLE-B7 Broad-Group Coupled Neutron/Gamma Cross-Section Libraries Derived from ENDF/B-VII.0 Nuclear Data (NUREG/CR-7045, ORNL/TM-2011/12)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7045 (PDF - 4.61 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2011**Date Published:** September 2011

**Prepared by:** J. M. Risner, D. Wiarda, M. E. Dunn, T. M. Miller D. E. Peplow, and B. W. Patton

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

Bernard L. Grenier, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code J4234

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

New coupled neutron-gamma cross-section libraries have been developed for use in light water reactor (LWR) shielding applications, including pressure vessel dosimetry calculations. The libraries, which were generated using Evaluated Nuclear Data File/B Version VII Release (ENDF/B-VII.0), use the same fine-group and broad-group energy structures as the VITAMIN-B6 and BUGLE-96 libraries. The processing methodology used to generate both libraries is based on the methods used to develop VITAMIN-B6 and BUGLE-96 and is consistent with ANSI/ANS 6.1.2. The ENDF data were first processed into the fine-group pseudo-problem-independent VITAMIN-B7 library and then collapsed into the broad-group BUGLE-B7 library. The VITAMIN-B7 library contains data for 391 nuclides. This represents a significant increase compared to the VITAMIN-B6 library, which contained data for 120 nuclides. The BUGLE-B7 library contains data for the same nuclides as BUGLE-96, and maintains the same numeric IDs for those nuclides. The broad-group data includes nuclides which are infinitely dilute and group collapsed using a concrete weighting spectrum, as well as nuclides which are self-shielded and group collapsed using weighting spectra representative of important regions of LWRs. The verification and validation of the new libraries includes a set of critical benchmark experiments, a set of regression tests that are used to evaluate multigroup cross-section libraries in the SCALE code system, and three pressure vessel dosimetry benchmarks. Results of these tests confirm that the new libraries are appropriate for use in LWR shielding analyses and meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.190.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Exhibit 32.2

Form 10-KSB 

Ogden Golf Co. Corporation

File No. 333-105075

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Ogden Golf Co. Corporation (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

I, Robert R. Petersen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

 

1.         the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ogden Golf Co. Corporation.

 

 

| Dated: December 1, 2007 | By: /s/ Robert R. Petersen  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                    | Robert R. Petersen          |
|                    | Principal Financial Officer |
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Proposed Approach for Reviewing Changes to Risk-Important Human Actions (NUREG/CR-6689)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6689 (PDF - 4.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2000**Date Published:** October 2000

**Prepared by:** J.C. Higgins, J.M. O'Hara

Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000

P. Lewis, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6022

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is addressing the human performance aspects of changes to operator actions that are credited for safety, especially those involving changes in the licensing basis of the plant; e.g., use of manual action in place of an automatic action for safety system operations. This report proposes risk-informed guidance and acceptance criteria for the review of licensee proposals addressing such modifications. The review method uses a graded, risk-informed approach and provides guidance for reviewing the human performance aspects of changes to plant systems and operations. The evaluation method uses a two-phase approach. The first phase is a screening analysis of the plant modification and the affected human actions (HAs) to determine their risk importance. Three risk regions are defined: high, medium, and lower risk regions. In the second phase, HAs are reviewed using human factors engineering criteria to ensure the proposed HA can be reliably performed when called upon in the plant. HAs in the high-risk region receive a detailed review and those in the medium-risk region receive a less detailed review that is commensurate with their risk. For HAs falling into the lower-risk region, no human factors review is performed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of KS-1 Experimental Data on the Behavior of the Heated Rod Temperatures in the Partially Uncovered VVER Core Model Using RELAP5/MOD3.2 (NUREG/IA-0169)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0169 (PDF 5.11 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** November 1999

**Prepared by:** V A. Vinogradov, A. Y. Balykin

Nuclear Safety Institute Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" 123182, Moscow Russia

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report has been prepared as a part of the Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program.

KS-1 Test 35-1 data on the behaviour of the heated rod temperatures in the partially uncovered VVER Core model were simulated with RELAP5/MOD3.2 to assess the code, especially its nonequilibrium (unequal phase temperatures) heat transfer models for modeling phenomena in partially uncovered core under Small Break LOCA conditions.

The test has been carried out at experimental section KS-1 of the test facility KS (RRC KI) in 1991. KS-1 experimental section (VVER Loop model) includes models of all main elements of VVER type reactor, loop hot leg model and cold leg simulator, and also horizontal SG tube bundle simulator with passive heat removal. Core model consists of 19 electrically heated rod simulators with diameter 9 mm and height 2.5 m.

Test 35-1 models thermal and hydraulic processes during reflux condenser mode in primary circuit with low mixture level in partially uncovered VVER core under conditions of small residual heat power, middle pressure and counter current flow in the core.

First a study of the effect of the hydraulic nodalization to the code calculations was performed using different number of hydraulic volumes for Core model. After the choice of proper nodalization and maximum user-specified time step, base case calculations were done for the test. The differences between code predictions for behavior of rod simulator temperatures along the height of Core model and test data are described and analyzed.

Sensitivity studies were carried out to investigate the effects of modeling on the behavior of the rod simulator temperatures along the height of Core model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No: II-19-026 April 29, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Robinson Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have

named Matt Fannon as the agency’s senior resident inspector at 

Duke Energy’s Robinson nuclear power plant, located near 

Hartsville, S.C., approximately 26 miles northwest of Florence.

Fannon joined the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, 

Pa., in June 2013 after graduating from the University of Tennessee 

with a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering. He was a reactor 

engineer in the Region I Division of Reactor Projects until he 

became a resident inspector at the Limerick nuclear plant in 

Pennsylvania in 2015.

Fannon is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program and 

has completed a rigorous inspector qualification program. He also served in the U.S. Navy nuclear 

propulsion program for six years.

He joins NRC Resident Inspector Amy Beasten at the Robinson site.

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public.