##### Table of Contents

---

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1



---



|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission file number: 333-60580



---

HUSKER AG, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |  |  |                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|Nebraska                                                       |  |  |  | 47-0836953                       
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  |  |  | (IRS Employer Identification No.)

54048 Highway 20

Plainview, Nebraska 68769

(402) 582-4446

(Address and telephone number of Issuers principal executive offices)



---

Securities registered under
Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Membership Units ($1,000 per unit)

(Title of class)



---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES ̈NO  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES ̈NO  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer
and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated
filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    YES ̈NO  x

The aggregate market value of the membership units held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 31, 2005,
was $26,637,521, based on the average price of certain membership units sold through the registrants Trading System during the year. Membership units held by each executive officer and director of the registrant have been excluded in that such
persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of March 29, 2006, the Company had 15,318 membership units issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.





---



---

##### Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Husker Ag, LLC (the Company) is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) to amend Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006 (the Original Report). This Amendment No. 1 includes the information that was to be incorporated by reference from the
Companys definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the filing of this Amendment No. 1, the Company also is including as exhibits certain currently dated
certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

For convenience and ease of reference, this Amendment No. 1
sets forth the Annual Report on Form 10-K in its entirety with the applicable changes. This Amendment No. 1 only reflects the changes discussed above, and does not amend, update, or change any other items or disclosures contained in the Original
Report.



---

##### Table of Contents

HUSKER AG, LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|           |  |                                                                                                         |  |   
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|PART I     |  |                                                                                                         |  |   
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 1.    |  | BUSINESS                                                                                                |  | 1 
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 1A.   |  | RISK FACTORS                                                                                            |  | 9 
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 1B.   |  | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS                                                                               |  | 13
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 2.    |  | PROPERTY                                                                                                |  | 13
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 3.    |  | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS                                                                                       |  | 13
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 4.    |  | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS                                                     |  | 13
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|PART II    |  |                                                                                                         |  |   
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 5.    |  | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED MEMBER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |  | 13
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 6     |  | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA                                                                                 |  | 16
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 7.    |  | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS                   |  | 16
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 7A.   |  | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK                                              |  | 30
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 8.    |  | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA                                                             |  | 33
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 9.    |  | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE                    |  | 49
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 9A.   |  | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES                                                                                 |  | 49
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 9B.   |  | OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                       |  | 50
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|PART III   |  |                                                                                                         |  |   
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 10.   |  | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT                                                      |  | 50
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 11.   |  | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION                                                                                  |  | 54
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 12.   |  | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED MEMBER MATTERS               |  | 56
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 13.   |  | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS                                                          |  | 58
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 14.   |  | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES                                                                  |  | 59
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|PART IV    |  |                                                                                                         |  |   
|           |  |                                                                                                        
|ITEM 15.   |  | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES                                                              |  | 60
|           | 
|SIGNATURES |  | 63                                                                                                     



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General Overview

Husker Ag, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company f/k/a Husker Ag Processing, LLC (Husker Ag or the Company), was organized on August 29, 2000 to construct and operate an ethanol plant
located near Plainview, Nebraska. The Company completed construction of its plant and began operating in early 2003. Husker Ag is managed by a thirteen member Board of Directors.

Husker Ags ethanol plant converts, on an annual basis, roughly nine million bushels of corn into approximately 25 million gallons of ethanol per year. The ethanol plant also produces over 160,000 tons
annually of animal feed known as distillers grain, which may be sold as distillers dried grain with solubles, distillers modified wet grain and distillers wet grain. These types of distillers grain are the principal co-products of the ethanol
production process. The Company currently produces and sells only modified wet distillers grain.

General Developments

Investment in Val-E Ethanol, LLC

On
December 28, 2005, Husker Ag executed a Subscription Agreement to purchase a minority membership interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company which will construct, own, and operate a 45-million gallon per year ethanol
plant located near Ord, Nebraska. Husker Ag purchased 1,200 units for $5,000 per unit, for an aggregate total of $6,000,000 subject to the terms and conditions of the Subscription Agreement dated December 28, 2005. Husker Ag borrowed $4,500,000
for the purchase of this interest resulting in a 24.1% interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below under Item 7 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding this loan.

In December 2005, Val-E Ethanol, LLC broke ground on the ethanol plant. The estimated date of completion is March 2007, and when construction is complete, the facility
is expected to use 16 million bushels of corn each year and produce 97,000 tons of dry distillers grains and 95,000 tons of wet distillers grains. Husker Ag has the right to appoint two managers to the nine-member Board of Managers but will not
be capable of exercising control over Val-E Ethanol, LLC. At December 31, 2005, Platte Valley Fuel Ethanol, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, was majority owner of Val-E Ethanol, LLC and it also controlled the Board of Managers. Platte
Valley Fuel Ethanol was then controlled by Ron and Diane Fagen. Ron Fagen and his family own the controlling interest in Fagen, Inc.

On February 16,
2006, US BioEnergy Corporation, a Brookings, South Dakota based company (US BioEnergy), announced that it was acquiring Platte Valley Fuel Ethanol.

US BioEnergy is currently a privately held corporation controlled by Fagen, Inc. and/or its affiliates. O. Wayne Mitchell, a member of the Husker Ag Board of Directors, is a Senior Vice President for Fagen, Inc.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

and is also a member of the US BioEnergy Board of Directors. More information about US BioEnergy is available on its website at www.USbioenergy.net.

The Companys investment in Val-E Ethanol, LLC is a long-term, illiquid investment. Val-E Ethanol, LLC is not expected to be able to make
distributions to its members before it is operational; and there is no assurance of payment of dividends to Husker Ag in the future.

Possible Expansion of Plant

On February 28, 2006, the Husker Ag Board of Directors approved a plan to proceed
with a plant expansion project (the Plant Expansion Project) at the current Husker Ag location near Plainview, Nebraska, subject to member approval at the upcoming Husker Ag annual meeting.

On March 28, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved a Letter of Intent with ICM, Inc., an ethanol plant design build contractor located in Colwich,
Kansas. The Letter of Intent sets forth our understanding with ICM for the design, construction and start-up of a plant expansion project that would add 40 million gallons per year of ethanol production capacity to the Companys existing
operations. This proposed expansion would result in the Companys total plant capacity exceeding 60 million gallons per year.

Except for certain
provisions, the Letter of Intent is not a binding or legally enforceable agreement pending the negotiation and signing of a binding definitive agreement between Husker Ag and ICM. This transaction is subject to approval of the Husker Ag members as
well as the Companys bank. Although these non-binding terms are subject to change, the Letter of Intent contemplates (a) a contract price in the amount of $45,500,000 for the cost of the plant expansion; and (b) a commencement date
of March 15, 2007. One of the binding provisions of the Letter of Intent requires the Company to pay ICM a down payment in the amount of 10% of the contract price with the payment required in installments as follows: (i) $2 million is due
upon the signing of the Letter of Intent; (ii) another $2 million is due on or before the later of the date that the definitive agreement is signed or nine days after the Companys annual meeting of members; and (iii) the remaining
balance of the down payment is due when Husker Ag delivers its notice to proceed to ICM under the definitive agreement. Under certain circumstances, the down payment is refundable  except to the extent that ICM is required to use any portion
of the down payment for costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with any preliminary work on the project requested or approved by the Company in writing.

As indicated in greater detail in the Companys press release issued on March 29, 2006, the Company intends to pursue a rights offering to help finance this proposed expansion.

Description of Dry Mill Process

The Companys ethanol plant
produces ethanol by processing corn. The corn is delivered, weighed and then unloaded in a receiving building. It is then transported to a scalper to remove rocks and debris before it is conveyed to storage bins. Thereafter, the corn is transported
to a hammermill or grinder where it is ground into flour and conveyed into a tank for processing. Water, heat and enzymes are added to break down the starch in the ground corn. The resulting slurry is heat sterilized and pumped to a tank where
additional enzymes are added to further breakdown the starch. Next, the mash is pumped into fermenters, where other enzymes and yeast are added, to begin a batch fermentation process. A distillation process divides the alcohol from the corn beer.
The alcohol, which exits the distillation process, is then further dried using a molecular sieve. The resulting 200 proof alcohol is then pumped to farm shift tanks and blended with five percent gasoline denaturant as it is pumped into storage
tanks.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

Stillage from the distillation process is then pumped into one of several centrifuges and water from the centrifuges is
evaporated into a thick syrup. The solids that exit the centrifuge are called wet cake and may be conveyed to a dryer for drying. Syrup may be added to the wet cake as it enters the dryer, where moisture will be removed. This process produces
distillers dried grain with solubles, which may be used as animal feed. The wet grain and syrup may be combined and sold as animal feed without drying or with only partial drying.

Principal Products

Ethanol

Ethanol is ethyl alcohol, a fuel component made primarily from corn and various other grains, and can be used as: (a) an octane enhancer in fuels; (b) an
oxygenated fuel additive that can reduce ozone and carbon monoxide vehicle emissions; and (c) a non-petroleum-based gasoline extender. Ethanol has important applications and is used primarily as a high quality octane enhancer and an oxygenate
capable of reducing air pollution and improving automobile performance. The overwhelming majority of all ethanol is used in its primary form for blending with unleaded gasoline and other fuel products. As a fuel additive, the demand for ethanol is
derived from the overall demand for gasoline, as well as the competition of ethanol versus competing oxygenate products and technologies. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, ethanol sales comprised 81.1%, 74.2% and 64.5%,
respectively, of the Companys total net sales.

Distillers Grain

A principal co-product of the ethanol production process is distillers grain, a high protein, high-energy animal feed supplement primarily marketed to the dairy and beef
industry. Dry mill ethanol processing may create three forms of distillers grain: distillers wet grain, distillers modified wet grain, and distillers dried grain. Distillers wet grain is processed corn mash that contains approximately 70% moisture.
It has a shelf life of approximately 3 summer days (5 winter days). Distillers modified wet grain is similar except that it has been dried to approximately 50% moisture. It has a slightly longer shelf life of approximately two to three weeks and is
often sold to nearby markets. Dried distillers grain is corn mash that has been dried to 10% moisture. It has an almost indefinite shelf life and may be sold and shipped to any market regardless of its vicinity to an ethanol plant. The Company is
currently producing almost entirely distillers modified wet grain which is sold to nearby markets. The Company could switch to dried distillers grain if there were a significant change in local demand or a material change in market conditions for
the Companys current modified wet grain product. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, distillers grain sales comprised 12.9%, 15.3% and 14.0%, respectively, of the Companys total net sales.

Customers

Management does not consider the Companys business
to be dependent on a single customer or a few customers, and the loss of any of our customers would not have a material adverse effect on our results. However, as of December 31, 2005, the Company had receivables from Eco-Energy, Inc.
(Eco-Energy) amounting to 50% of the total trade receivables. Eco-Energy is a re-seller of ethanol and therefore its customers are indirectly a part of the Companys customer base. While the Company acknowledges the potential credit
risk from this large customer, the Company currently has sufficient demand for its products and Management would expect to find other customers should Eco-Energys purchases from the Company decrease for any reason. See the section entitled
Marketing and Distribution Methods  Ethanol below for information regarding the Companys agreement with Eco-Energy.

Ethanol
Industry

Fuel ethanol is sold primarily to oil refiners and gasoline distributors for blending with gasoline. By extending fuel supplies, enhancing
fuel octane, and serving as an oxygenate for meeting environmental standards, fuel ethanol provides a strategic benefit to marketers of gasoline. Fuel grade ethanol prices traditionally have varied directly with the wholesale price of gasoline.
Historically, fuel grade ethanol prices have also reflected a premium due to the oxygenate and octane enhancing properties of this motor fuel additive. However, given the large amount of ethanol production coming on line in the foreseeable future,
ethanol prices may be driven down regardless of whether the wholesale price of gasoline continues to rise. See sections below entitled Competition and Risk Factors for further discussion of this issue.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

According to the Renewable Fuels Association, the fuel ethanol industry has been growing in terms of gallons produced at
a compound annual growth rate of 13.2% since 1980. This growth has been the result of strong underlying economic demand and public support for fuel ethanol, which has been driven by a variety of factors. One of the most important factors is the
strategic benefit gasoline suppliers receive from using fuel ethanol as an octane enhancer and as an extender of gasoline supplies. Another significant factor has been the environmental benefits of fuel ethanol as an oxygenate, which has made it
attractive to gasoline suppliers for marketing purposes and for meeting environmental standards.

The ethanol industry has
been dependent on several governmental economic incentives.

Federal Ethanol Supports

In order to address two distinct pollution problems, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 created two programs mandating changes in fuel composition: the Federal Oxygen
Program aimed at carbon monoxide; and the Reformulated Gasoline Program targeted at smog-forming emissions. These programs created a market for ethanol as an oxygenate.

The Federal Oxygen Program became effective November 1, 1992, and had the largest effect on ethanol sales. This program requires the sale of oxygenated motor fuels during the fall and winter months in certain
major metropolitan areas to reduce carbon monoxide pollution. The Reformulated Gasoline Program became effective January 1, 1995. This program requires the sale of reformulated gasoline in certain major urban areas to reduce pollutants,
including those that contribute to ground level ozone (i.e., smog).

In August 2005, President George W. Bush signed into law the Energy Policy Act of
2005. The Energy Policy Act contains numerous provisions that are expected to favorably impact the ethanol industry. The new legislation created the first-ever nationwide Renewable Fuels Standard (the RFS) in federal law, requiring
that at least 4 billion gallons of ethanol and biodiesel be used in 2006, increasing approximately 700 million gallons per year until it reaches a requirement of 7.5 billion gallons in 2012.

The RFS is a mandate requiring fuel refiners to use a certain minimum amount of renewable fuel blends in our nations fuel supply. It is anticipated that the vast
majority of the renewable fuel used will be ethanol. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, the Energy Policy Act is expected to double the domestic ethanol industry in the next 6 years.

Since current national ethanol production capacity exceeds the 2006 RFS requirement of 4 billion gallons, the RFS requirements may not impact the demand for and the
resulting price for ethanol in the short-term. However, it is possible that the increased RFS requirement of 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuel by 2012 may help support ethanol prices in the long-term.

In addition, the Energy Policy Act includes a tax credit that allows taxpayers to claim a 30% federal income tax credit (up to $30,000) for the cost of installing
clean-fuel refueling infrastructure to be used in a trade or business or installed at the principal residence of the taxpayer. Under the provision, clean fuels include any fuel at least 85% of the volume of which consists of ethanol, natural
gas, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and/or hydrogen as well as certain mixtures of diesel fuel and biodiesel. The tax credit is effective for equipment placed in service between December 31, 2005,
and January 1, 2010. This credit will not likely materially affect the demand for ethanol in the short term, but it may help increase consumer awareness of E85 fuel (85% ethanol 15% gasoline) which could eventually marginally increase
demand for ethanol.

The use of ethanol as an oxygenate to blend with fuel to comply with federal mandates also has been aided by federal tax policy.

Husker Ag has received and expects to continue to receive benefits from economic incentives to produce ethanol. The primary federal incentive is the
exemption of 10% ethanol blends from 5.2 cents per gallon federal gas tax during 2004. This exemption was reduced to 5.1 cents per gallon in 2005. Because the exemption generally applies to 10% blends, it amounts to an effective subsidy of 51 cents
per gallon of pure ethanol (5.1 cents / 10%).



4



---

##### Table of Contents

On October 22, 2004, President Bush signed H.R. 4520 into law which contained the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax
Credit (VEETC) and amended the federal excise tax structure effective as of January 1, 2005. The VEETC replaced the exemption described above with a new volumetric ethanol excise tax credit of 51 cents per gallon of ethanol blended
through December 31, 2010. Unlike the previous exemption described above, the tax credit under the VEETC is from general revenues and does not impact the highway trust fund, and thus the VEETC removes a disincentive for states to use ethanol.

Husker Ag has also received the benefits of the federal small producers credit which is a $.10 per gallon of ethanol tax credit available for
ethanol produced at plants with 60 million gallons or less of annual capacity. Ethanol producers that qualify can deduct from their federal income tax $.10 per gallon on the first 15 million gallons produced annually. The small producer
tax credit is scheduled to sunset December 31, 2010. With the passing of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the definition of a small producer was increased from 30 million to 60 million gallons. The pass-through nature of Husker
Ags partnership taxation structure applies to any small producer tax credit received. The credit, if any, received by Husker Ag, will be passed through to its members; however, the amount of any such credit received by a member must also be
included in the gross income of the member, which could result in the taxation of the amount of the credit distributed to the member.

On February 28,
2006, the Company announced its tentative plans to commence a 40 million gallon plant expansion. If the Company completes the expansion as presently proposed, Husker Ag will no longer qualify as a small producer and the small producer tax
credit will end for Husker Ag members in the year that the Companys total production capacity surpasses the 60 million gallon limit.

The
Company has also received ethanol producer credits from the United States Department of Agriculture Commodity Credit Corporations Bioenergy Program. Cash payments to eligible ethanol producers are based on the increase in gallons of ethanol
produced from the prior federal fiscal year (which is an October 1 to September 30 fiscal year) and the market price of corn at the end of each quarter, with a more favorable calculation structure used for producers who generate less than
65 million gallons of ethanol annually. In 2004, the Company received approximately $2.2 million under this program. However, because the Company operated at nearly full capacity during 2004, the Company received no benefits under this program
in 2005. The Company does not anticipate receiving any significant payments under this program in 2006 or in the foreseeable future.

State Ethanol Supports

Husker Ag has also received and anticipates continuing to receive economic benefits to
produce ethanol at the state level. The State of Nebraska established a production tax credit of $.18 per gallon of ethanol produced during a 96 consecutive month period by newly constructed ethanol facilities in production prior to June 30,
2004. The tax credit is only available to offset Nebraska motor fuels excise taxes. The tax credit is transferable and therefore Husker Ag transfers credits received to a Nebraska gasoline retailer who then reimburses Husker Ag for the face value of
the credit amount less a handling fee. Under current Nebraska law, no producer can receive tax credits for more than 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol produced in one year and no producer can receive tax credits for more than 125 million gallons of
ethanol produced over a consecutive 96 month period. The minimum production level to qualify for credits is 100,000 gallons of ethanol annually. Assuming Husker Ag continues to produce at least 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol in a year, this producer
tax credit could result in payments of up to $2,812,500 to Husker Ag annually; subject to the statutory maximum limit. The production incentive is scheduled to expire June 30, 2012. See Risk Factors below.

Marketing and Distribution Methods

Ethanol

Commencing June 1, 2005, the Company entered into the Risk Management and Ethanol Marketing Contract (the
2005 Marketing Agreement) with FCStone, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company



5



---

##### Table of Contents

(FCStone), and Eco-Energy, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (Eco-Energy) pursuant to which FCStone provides the Company with a full
service price risk management program, and Eco-Energy purchases the Companys entire output of ethanol in good faith at fair market rates for the term of the agreement. The current term of the 2005 Marketing Agreement expires on
September 30, 2006, and it will be automatically renewed unless the Company provides notice of termination prior to June 1, 2006.

The Company
has had an on-going relationship with Eco-Energy and FCStone since 2002 when the parties executed the Risk Management and Ethanol Marketing Contract dated November 27, 2002 (the 2002 Marketing Agreement). The 2005 Marketing
Agreement amended and superseded the 2002 Marketing Agreement. The 2002 Marketing Agreement otherwise would have expired in September 2005. The agreement was primarily amended as to the terms of delivery of ethanol. Otherwise, the terms and
conditions of the 2002 Marketing Agreement are substantially similar to the terms and conditions of the 2005 Marketing Agreement in all material respects.

Under the 2005 Marketing Agreement, Eco-Energy markets ethanol for an agreed-upon fee, which includes the cost of the rail shipment and collects the sales amount from the ultimate customers, remitting the net sales price to the Company
within three business days after the sale.

As a re-seller of ethanol, Eco-Energys customers are indirectly a part of the Companys customer
base. Eco-Energy markets and sells most of its ethanol throughout the United States, primarily by rail. The target market area for the ethanol produced at the Companys ethanol plant includes local, regional and national markets. The local and
regional markets include the State of Nebraska, as well as markets in South Dakota, Kansas, Missouri, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, Iowa, California, New Mexico and Oregon.

Distillers Grain

The dry milling
process that produces ethanol also produces distillers grain, which are primarily used as a high protein animal feed. The price of distillers grain generally varies with grain prices, so that increases in grain costs are partially offset by
increases in distillers grain prices. Husker Ag is currently producing almost entirely distillers modified wet grain which is marketed and sold primarily to feedlots, cattle feeders and dairies within a 120-mile radius of the ethanol plant.

On January 25, 2004, the Husker Ag Board of Directors adopted a Policy on Marketing which, among other things, provides that commencing April 1,
2004, no employee of Husker Ag, no member of the Board of Directors, and no person performing marketing functions for the Company, shall haul or have any ownership interest in trucks or entities which haul the Companys products. During 2004,
Husker Ag hired a full-time employee to undertake primary responsibility for the sale and marketing of distillers grain.

Competition

Husker Ag is in direct competition with numerous other ethanol producers, many of whom have greater resources than the Company does. The Company expects that additional
ethanol producers will enter the market if the demand for ethanol continues to increase. Husker Ags ethanol plant will compete with other ethanol producers on the basis of price and, to a lesser extent, delivery service.

During the last twenty years, ethanol production capacity in the United States has grown from almost nothing to more than 4.4 billion gallons at the end of 2005. Based
upon information provided by the Renewable Fuels Association (the RFA), 95 ethanol plants located in 20 states produced a record of nearly 4 billion gallons of ethanol in 2005, an increase of 17% from 2004 and 126% since 2001. Fourteen
new facilities combined with expansions at existing plants, increased the industrys annual production capacity by a record 779 million gallons according to the RFA. The RFA reported that 29 plants and nine major expansions were under
construction at the end of 2005 which would increase production capacity by approximately 1.5 billion gallons per year. This increase in capacity is expected to continue in the near future. Husker Ag cannot determine the effect of this type of an
increase upon the demand or price of ethanol, although such plants may compete with the Company in the sale of ethanol and related products.

The ethanol
industry has grown to nearly 95 production facilities in the United States. Industry authorities estimate that these facilities, along with approximately 33 facilities and six major expansions currently



6



---

##### Table of Contents

under construction, are capable of producing in excess of 6.5 billion gallons of ethanol per year. The largest ethanol producers include Archer Daniels
Midland, Cargill, New Energy Corp., MGP Ingredients, Inc., VeraSun Energy Corporation and Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc., all of which are capable of producing much more ethanol than the Company expects to produce. In addition, there are several
regional entities recently formed, or in the process of formation, of a similar size and with similar resources to those of Husker Ag.

In addition to the
plants under construction, plans to construct additional new plants or to expand existing plants have been announced which would further increase the ethanol production capacity of the Companys competitors. Husker Ag is unable to determine the
number and production capacity of plants that ultimately may be constructed, the timing of such construction or the effect of resulting production upon the demand for or price of the Companys ethanol. However, it is possible that the
plant-building boom will create a market glut for ethanol thereby driving ethanol prices, along with the Companys revenues, down due to the increasing supply.

Raw Materials and Other Inputs

The principal costs associated with the operation of the plant are employment costs,
utilities, purchase of corn inventory, purchase of enzymes, chemicals and other materials necessary to operate the plant, interest on indebtedness and general and administrative expenses. Increases in the price of corn and/or other inputs such as
natural gas may have a material impact on the profitability of the Company.

Corn Supply and Corn Prices

The Husker Ag ethanol plant needs between approximately 8.5 and 9.5 million bushels of corn per year or approximately 26,000 bushels per day as
the feedstock for its dry milling process. The grain supply for the ethanol plant is obtained primarily from local markets. During the five year period between 1996 to 2000, corn production averaged 94 million bushels annually in the five
county area surrounding the plant. Since 2000, the corn production has increased somewhat in this five county area. Management believes that the average annual corn production is this area should generally remain consistent in the near future.

The price and availability of corn are subject to significant fluctuations depending upon a number of factors which affect commodity prices in general,
including crop conditions, weather, governmental programs and foreign purchases. Because the market price of ethanol is not related to grain prices, ethanol producers are generally not able to compensate for increases in the cost of grain feedstock
through adjustments in prices charged for their ethanol. Therefore, the Companys profitability will be negatively impacted during periods of high grain prices.

The Company has also retained Husker Trading, Inc. to originate and acquire corn for plant usage rather than hiring an on-site commodities manager. As part of its responsibilities, Husker Trading, Inc. will ensure the
consistent scheduling of grain deliveries and to establish and fill forward contracts through grain elevators and will coordinate grain deliveries between the railroad, participating elevators and producers, as well as negotiate price protection
with hedging specialists.

Options and Futures Contracts  Hedging

In an attempt to minimize the effects of the volatility of corn and natural gas costs and other inputs on operating profits, Husker Ag has taken hedging positions in corn and natural gas futures and option markets.
Similarly, in an attempt to minimize the effects of market volatility of the Companys gas-plus forward contracts for the sale of ethanol, Husker Ag has taken hedging positions in unleaded gas futures and options markets.

Hedging means protecting the price at which the Company buys corn and natural gas and the price at which it will sell its products in the future. It is a way to attempt
to reduce the risk caused by price fluctuation. The effectiveness of hedging activities is dependent upon, among other things, the cost of corn, natural gas and unleaded gas as well as Husker Ags ability to sell sufficient amounts of ethanol
and distillers grain to utilize all of the commodities subject to the option and futures contracts. Hedging activities can result in costs to the Company because price movements in grain, natural gas and unleaded gas contracts are highly volatile
and are influenced by many factors which are beyond the Companys control.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

The Company uses natural gas as its main source of energy. Natural gas prices have historically fluctuated significantly.
Increases in the price of natural gas would harm the Company by increasing its energy costs. An increase in the price of natural gas has a direct impact on the Companys costs to produce ethanol. For this reason, the Company began purchasing
option and futures contracts on natural gas for the first time in January 2005.

A relatively small percentage of the Companys forward contracts for
the sale of ethanol are priced as gas-plus contracts where the Company receives a price per gallon of ethanol sold equal to the then average unleaded gas price per gallon plus a fixed amount. Since unleaded gas prices fluctuate,
decreases in gasoline prices cause the Companys revenues on these gas-plus contracts to decrease. Therefore, as part of its hedging strategy, the Company also began purchasing option and futures contracts on unleaded gas for the first time in
January 2005.

The Company enters into option and futures contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of corn and natural gas projected
to be used in the manufacturing process and ethanol expected to be sold. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the exposure to price risk related to corn and natural gas purchases and ethanol sales. The Company currently does
not meet the requirements for cash flow hedging under FASB 133. See Note 7 to the Companys Financial Statements included below for additional information.

As noted above, the Company has entered into a risk management agreement with FCStone, LLC (FCStone), a commodities risk management firm, under which FCStone provides the Company with advice, assistance and a price risk
management program for corn products necessary for the operation of the plant.

In February 2004, the Husker Ag Board of Directors adopted a Risk
Management Policy, which establishes a Risk Management Committee to serve as the liaison between management and Board regarding forward pricing and risk management issues. The Risk Management Committee is currently comprised of General Manager Seth
Harder, and Board members Mike Kinney, Stanley Gyberg, Leonard Wostrel and David Stearns. The Risk Management Policy also establishes position limits and forward pricing guidelines with respect to risk exposure for corn, distillers grain, ethanol,
denaturant and natural gas, as well as approval procedures for management and the Risk Management Committee, approved commodity transaction instruments, and reporting and accounting function verification requirements.

Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

The operations of
Husker Ag are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations with respect to environmental matters, including air and water quality and underground fuel storage tanks. Husker Ag believes it is currently in substantial compliance
with environmental laws and regulations. Protection of the environment requires Husker Ag to incur expenditures for equipment, processes and permitting. If Husker Ag were found to have violated federal, state or local environmental regulations, the
Company could incur liability for cleanup costs, damage claims from third parties and civil or criminal penalties that could materially adversely affect its business.

The Company filed an application with the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (the NDEQ) for its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPEDS) waste water permit on August 2, 2002,
and received its waste water permit from the NDEQ and such permit was effective February 26, 2003. As of December 31, 2005, the NDEQ had not yet issued Husker Ag its Air Quality Operating Permit. Therefore, the Company has been subject to
its Construction Permit which was issued in January 2002. This permit limits production at the plant to 25,000,000 gallons of denatured alcohol.

Because
Husker Ag elected to purchase a thermal oxidizer rather than use a boiler, the NDEQ determined that the Husker Ag Air Quality Operating Permit needed modification to include the impact of the thermal oxidizer on the plants dispersion modeling.
The Company completed stack testing as required under the NDEQ regulations and submitted the results of such testing on October 24, 2003. The submission also



8



---

##### Table of Contents

included a request to increase the ethanol production permitted under the permit to approximately 27,000,000 gallons of denatured alcohol per year. The Air
Quality Operating Permit was submitted to the NDEQ on March 3, 2004. The NDEQ required the Company to comply with certain conditions including the paving of the plant roadways. This paving was completed in April 2005.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, Husker Ag produced more than 25,000,000 gallons of denatured alcohol, which exceeded its Construction Permit limit.
The Company informed the NDEQ of this matter. The Company does not expect any penalty for exceeding its limit in 2004. During 2005, prior to receiving its modified permit, Husker Ag operated its plant at a rate of 25,000,000 gallons, or less, of
denatured alcohol per year. On February 25, 2005, the Company submitted a modification to the construction permit application requesting a limit of approximately 32,000,000 gallons per year and the Company received approval for the modified Air
Permit from the NDEQ on June 13, 2005. This modified permit allowed the Company to increase its production.

During October and November 2005, Husker
Ag conducted compliance testing as required by the NDEQ to determine whether it was operating in compliance with its modified Air Permit issued June 13, 2005. The Company submitted the final results of such testing in December 2005. The
preliminary results from this test were favorable and indicated that the plant is in compliance with the limits of its modified Air Permit issued June 13, 2005. The Company currently anticipates that it will have a resolution to its operating
permit application during the second quarter of 2006. In the meantime, Husker Ag believes that it can increase its production and still comply with its modified Air Permit.

Employees

As of March 29, 2006, Husker Ag had a total of 35 employees managing and operating the ethanol plant
facility. Husker Ag is not subject to any collective bargaining agreements and has not experienced any work stoppages. Husker Ag management considers its relationship with its employees to be good.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Husker Ags business is not diversified and this could
reduce the value of the membership units.

Husker Ags success depends largely upon its ability to timely complete and profitably operate its
ethanol business. Husker Ag does not have any other lines of business or other sources of revenue if it is unable to manufacture ethanol and distillers grain. If economic or political factors adversely affect the market for ethanol, the value of its
membership units could decline because the Company has no other line of business to fall back on if the ethanol business declines. Husker Ags business would also be significantly harmed if its ethanol plant could not operate at full capacity
for any extended period of time.

Husker Ag is operating in an intensely competitive industry and competing with larger, better financed entities which
could impact its ability to operate profitably.

There is significant competition among ethanol producers. Husker Ag faces a competitive challenge from
larger ethanol plants, from plants that can produce a wider range of products than it can, and from other plants similar to its proposed ethanol plant. Husker Ags ethanol plant is in direct competition with other ethanol producers, many of
which have greater resources than Husker Ag currently has. Large ethanol producers such as Archer Daniels Midlands and Cargill, among others, are capable of producing a significantly greater amount of ethanol than Husker Ag currently expects to
produce. In addition, there are several Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota and other Midwest regional ethanol producers which have recently formed, are in the process of forming, or are under consideration, which are or would be of
a similar size and have similar resources to Husker Ag.

Husker Ags ethanol plant also competes with producers of other gasoline additives made from
raw materials other than corn having similar octane and oxygenate values as ethanol, such as producers of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). MTBE is a petrochemical derived from methanol which generally costs less to produce than ethanol. Many
major oil companies produce MTBE and strongly favor its use because it is petroleum-based. Alternative fuels, gasoline oxygenates and alternative ethanol production methods are also continually under development. The major oil companies have
significantly greater



9



---

##### Table of Contents

resources than Husker Ag has to market MTBE, to develop alternative products, and to influence legislation and public perception of MTBE and ethanol. These
companies also have significant resources to begin production of ethanol should they choose to do so.

The rapid growth of production capacity in the
ethanol industry creates some market uncertainly for the ethanol industry.

At the end of 2005, existing construction at new and expanding ethanol
plants were predicted to increase ethanol production capacity by approximately 1.5 billion gallons per year. This would increase the existing nationwide production capacity by approximately 34%. This increase in capacity is expected to continue in
the near future. Husker Ag cannot determine what effect this increase in production will have upon the demand or price of ethanol. At a minimum, this increased capacity creates some uncertainty for the ethanol industry.

Although the Company believes that there will be an increase in the demand for ethanol in the future as a result of the phase out of MTBE, Husker Ag cannot provide any
assurance or guarantee that there will be any material or significant increases in the demand for ethanol. If the production of ethanol exceeds either the demand for ethanol or the petroleum industrys ability to blend ethanol with gasoline,
then the price of ethanol would be expected to fall, and such fall in ethanol prices could be significant. In that case, the Companys revenues would decrease accordingly.

The increased production of ethanol could have other adverse effects as well. For example, the increased production will also lead to increased supplies of co-products from the production of ethanol, such as
distillers grain. Those increased supplies could lead to lower prices for those co-products. Also, the increased production of ethanol could result in increased demand for corn which could in turn lead to higher prices for corn, resulting in higher
costs of production and lower profits.

Changes in the supply and demand, and production and price with respect to corn could make it more expensive to
produce ethanol which could decrease Husker Ags profits.

Ethanol production will require substantial amounts of corn. Corn, as with most other
crops, is affected by weather, governmental policy, disease and other conditions. A significant reduction in the quantity of corn harvested due to adverse weather conditions such as drought, farmer planting decisions, domestic and foreign government
farm programs and policies, global demand and supply or other factors could result in increased corn costs which would increase Husker Ags cost to produce ethanol. The significance and relative impact of these factors on the price of corn is
difficult to predict. Significant variations in actual growing conditions from normal growing conditions also may adversely affect Husker Ags ability to procure corn for the proposed plant. Any events that tend to negatively impact the supply
of corn will tend to increase prices and harm Husker Ags business.

Rising corn prices produce lower profit margins for the production of ethanol and
therefore, represent unfavorable market conditions. This is especially true when market conditions do not allow Husker Ag to pass along increased corn costs to its customers. The price of corn has fluctuated significantly in the past and may
fluctuate significantly in the future. Substantial increases in the price of corn in 1996 caused some ethanol plants to temporarily cease production or lose money. Husker Ag cannot assure you that it will be able to offset any increase in the price
of corn by increasing the price of its products. If Husker Ag cannot offset increases in the price of corn, its financial performance may be materially and adversely affected.

Husker Ag purchases corn from local producers but Husker Ag does not currently have any definitive agreements with any corn producers or grain elevators to provide corn to its ethanol plant. The Company also attempts
to reduce the risks related to corn price volatility through the futures and option markets.

Federal regulations
concerning tax incentives could expire or change which could reduce Husker Ags revenues.

Congress currently provides certain federal tax
incentives for oxygenated fuel producers and marketers, including those who purchase ethanol to blend with gasoline in order to meet federally mandated oxygenated fuel requirements. These tax incentives include, generally, a excise tax credit for
gasoline



10



---

##### Table of Contents

blended with at least 10 percent, 7.7 percent, or 5.7 percent ethanol, and income tax credits for blenders of ethanol mixtures and small ethanol producers.
Gasoline marketers pay a reduced tax on gasoline that they sell that contains ethanol.

The ethanol industry and Husker Ags business depend on
continuation of the federal ethanol excise tax credit. This credit has supported a market for ethanol that might disappear without the credit. The federal excise tax credit is scheduled to expire December 31, 2010. These tax incentives to the
ethanol industry may not continue beyond their scheduled expiration date or, if they continue, the incentives may not be at the same level. The revocation or amendment of any one or more of those laws, regulations or programs could adversely affect
the future use of ethanol in a material way, and Husker Ag cannot guarantee that any of those laws, regulations or programs will be continued. The elimination or reduction of federal subsidy and tax incentives to the ethanol industry would have a
material adverse impact on Husker Ags business by making it more costly or difficult for it to produce and sell ethanol. If the federal ethanol tax incentives are eliminated or sharply curtailed, Husker Ag believes that a decreased demand for
ethanol will result.

Nebraska state producer incentives may be unavailable or could be modified which could reduce
Husker Ags revenues.

In 2001, LB 536 became law and established a production tax credit of 18¢ per gallon of ethanol produced during a
96 consecutive month period by newly constructed ethanol facilities in production prior to June 30, 2004. The tax credit is only available to offset Nebraska motor fuels excise taxes. The tax credit is transferable and therefore Husker Ag
transfers credits received to a Nebraska gasoline retailer who then reimburses Husker Ag for the face value of the credit amount less a handling fee. No producer can receive tax credits for more than 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol produced in one
year and no producer will receive tax credits for more than 125 million gallons of ethanol produced over the consecutive 96 month period. The minimum production level for a plant to qualify for credits is 100,000 gallons of ethanol annually.
Husker Ag has entered into a written agreement with the Tax Commissioner on behalf of the State of Nebraska pursuant to which Husker Ag agreed to produce ethanol at its designated facility and the State of Nebraska agreed to furnish the producer tax
credits in accordance with the terms of the new law.

In 2003, 2004 and 2005, because of State of Nebraska budget shortfalls, various tax credit provisions
in effect in Nebraska, including LB 536, came under increased scrutiny from the Nebraska Unicameral. As a result there can be no assurance that the Nebraska legislature will not in subsequent legislative sessions enact new legislation which would
revise LB 536, or otherwise adversely impact ethanol plants, such as Husker Ags plant, which are to benefit from LB 536.

Husker Ag believes there
are a number of existing projects in Nebraska that could compete with the Company for payments which may require legislature to increase funding for the producer incentive program through either an increase in general fund appropriation or other
sources such as the grain check-off program. Despite the Companys written agreement with the State of Nebraska, the Nebraska legislature could reduce or eliminate the producer tax credits at any time; however, a reduction or elimination would
constitute a breach of the contract by the State of Nebraska. The State of Nebraska could also impose taxes on the ethanol plants to provide additional funds for the ethanol production incentive fund. If the State of Nebraska established such a tax,
Husker Ag could be for example, required to pay taxes on the distillers grain it produces, which could have a material adverse impact on Husker Ags net income from the production incentive.

On February 6, 2004, the Nebraska Attorney General issued an opinion concerning certain proposed legislation (LB 479, as amended by AM0852) before the Nebraska
Unicameral, in which the Attorney General concluded that because LB 479 alters the definition of a new ethanol production facility eligible for ethanol tax credits under the Nebraska Ethanol Development Act (the Act), and
attempts to retroactively change vested rights of producers that have entered into agreements with the State of Nebraska, it likely created an unconstitutional impairment of contracts between the State of Nebraska and producers that have
been executed under existing law. The opinion further states that [T]he statute authorizing execution of these agreements specifically binds the State to provide such [ethanol tax] credits under the law in effect at the time of execution of
the agreements.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag has entered into an Ethanol Production Credit Agreement with the State of Nebraska (the EPC
Agreement) for the provision of ethanol tax credits as provided by the statutory provisions of the Act in effect on the date of the EPC Agreement (September 5, 2001). Under the EPC Agreement, Husker Ag is to be paid tax credits equal to
18¢ per gallon of ethanol, up to 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol produced in one year (up to $2,812,500 annually), and subject to a maximum payment of tax credits based on production of 125 million gallons over a consecutive 96 month
period. In the opinion of Husker Ag, the Attorney General opinion provides support for Husker Ags position that it is important that the State of Nebraska continue to meet its obligations in accordance with the terms of the EPC Agreement. The
text of the entire Attorney General Opinion (Opinion 04005, dated February 6, 2004) is available on-line at the Nebraska Attorney General website, www.ago.state.ne.us.

In the 2004 Nebraska Unicameral legislative session which ended April 15, 2004, the Nebraska legislature passed a funding mechanism to fully fund four ethanol plants in Nebraska that are currently qualified under
LB 536. However, LB 536 provided that any ethanol plants that were qualified by June 30, 2004, were accepted into the program. The Company believes that up to seven additional plants were qualified by that date, and to the extent payments are
made by the State of Nebraska to these additional plants, the funding for available credits could be reduced for the existing qualified plants, including Husker Ag, unless the Nebraska legislature would provide additional funding for the program.

Update for 2006 Legislative Session:

The 2006
Nebraska Unicameral legislative session is scheduled to end on or about April 12, 2006. The legislature is currently considering funding mechanisms to help ensure that LB 536 remains funded. However, none of the applicable legislative bills
have come to a final vote by the legislature as of March 27, 2006. The legislature is expected to continue to debate, and possibly vote on, one or more ethanol related bills during this session.

Husker Ag is subject to extensive environmental regulation and operational safety regulations that could result in higher than expected compliance costs and
liabilities.

The Company may be subject to regulations on emissions from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Further, EPA and
Nebraskas environmental regulations are subject to change and often such changes are not favorable to industry. Consequently, even if Husker Ag has the proper permits now, the Company may be required to invest or spend considerable resources
to comply with future environmental regulations.

The Companys failure to comply or the need to respond to threatened actions involving environmental
laws and regulations may adversely affect its business, operating results or financial condition. As an operational company, Husker Ag has developed procedures for the proper handling, storage, and transportation of finished products and materials
used in the production process and for the disposal of waste products. In addition, state or local requirements may also restrict the Companys production and distribution operations. Husker Ag could incur significant costs to comply with
applicable laws and regulations as production and distribution activity increases. Protection of the environment will require Husker Ag to incur expenditures for equipment or processes.

Husker Ag could also be subject to environmental nuisance or related claims by employees, property owners or residents near the proposed ethanol plant arising from air or water discharges. Ethanol production has been
known to produce an odor to which surrounding residents could object. If odors become a problem, Husker Ag may be subject to fines and could be forced to take costly curative measures. Environmental litigation or increased environmental compliance
costs could increase its operating costs.

Members may be required to pay taxes on their share of Husker Ags
income even if it makes no distributions to members.

Husker Ag expects to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes unless there is a
change of law or trading in the membership units is sufficient to classify Husker Ag as a publicly traded partnership. This means that Husker Ag will pay no income tax and all profits and losses will pass-



12



---

##### Table of Contents

through to its members who will pay tax on their share of Husker Ags profits. Husker Ags members may receive allocations of taxable income
that exceed any cash distributions made, if any. This may occur because of various factors, including but not limited to, accounting methodology, lending covenants that restrict Husker Ags ability to pay cash distributions, or its decision to
retain or use the cash generated by the business to fund its operating activities and obligations. Accordingly, members may be required to pay income tax on the allocated share of Husker Ags taxable income with personal funds, even if the
members receive little or no cash distributions from the Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

The Company is not an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer or well-known
seasoned issuer and has received no written comments regarding its periodic or current reports from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of its 2005 fiscal year and that remain
unresolved.

ITEM 2. PROPERTY

The Companys corporate offices are located at the plant site in the administrative building at
54048 Highway 20, Plainview, Nebraska 68769, phone number (402) 582-4446. The administrative building consists of approximately 5,700 square feet. The Husker Ag ethanol plant is on 47 acres of real property located 31/2miles east of Plainview, Nebraska between the railroad and US Highway 20 located in Pierce County, Nebraska. The
ethanol plant and plant site are subject to real estate mortgage liens granted to the Companys primarily lender, Union Bank & Trust Company, as described below under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. Husker Ags management believes the properties and facilities of Husker Ag are adequate to support Husker Ags ethanol business operations. The Companys ethanol plant currently has the capacity to produce
approximately 25 million gallons of ethanol per year. As noted above in Item 1, the Company currently intends to pursue a possible plant expansion that would add 40 million or more gallons per year of ethanol production capacity to
its existing operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Husker Ag has not been informed of any legal matters that would have a material adverse effect
on its financial condition, results of operation or cash flow.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of members during the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2005.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED MEMBER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There is no established trading market for Husker Ags membership units. To maintain its partnership tax status,
members of Husker Ag may not trade the membership units on an established securities market or readily trade the membership units on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof). All transfers are subject to a determination that the
transfer will not cause Husker Ag to be deemed a publicly traded partnership.

Husker Ag restricted the ability of members to transfer membership units in
its Operating Agreement. To help ensure that a secondary market does not develop, Husker Ags Operating Agreement prohibits transfers without the approval of its Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will not approve transfers unless they
fall within safe harbors contained in the publicly-traded partnership rules under the tax code, which include: (a) transfers by gift, (b) transfer upon death of a member, (c) transfers between family members, and
(d) transfers that comply with the qualifying matching services requirements. Any transfers of membership units in violation of the publicly traded partnership rules or without the prior consent of the Board will be invalid.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Under the Internal Revenue Code and the related rules and regulations (the Tax Code), a matching service is
qualified only if it meets a number of specified requirements, including: (1) it consists of a computerized or printed system that lists customers bid and/or ask prices in order to match members who want to sell with persons who want to
buy, (2) matching occurs either by matching the list of interested buyers with the list of interested sellers or through a bid and ask process that allows interested buyers to bid on the listed interest, (3) the seller cannot enter into a
binding agreement to sell the interest until the 15thcalendar day after his interest is listed (which date must be
confirmable by maintenance of contemporaneous records), (4) the closing of a sale effected through the matching service does not occur prior to the 45thcalendar day after the interest is listed, (5) the matching service displays only quotes that do not commit any person to buy or sell an interest at the quoted price (non firm price quotes) or
quotes that express an interest in acquiring an interest without an accompanying price (nonbinding indications of interest) and does not display quotes at which any person is committed to buy or sell a interest at the quoted price (firm quotes),
(6) the sellers information is removed within 120 days of its listing and is not reentered into the system for at least 60 days after its deletion, and (7) the sum of the percentage interests transferred during the entitys tax
year (excluding private transfers) cannot exceed 10% of the total interests in partnership capital or profits. The Husker Ag Trading System described below has incorporated these Tax Code requirements into its rules and procedures required to be
followed by those using the system.

On October 15, 2004, the Company received approval from the Nebraska Department to operate its own trading system
(the Trading System) limited to trading in membership units of Husker Ag. As a result of this approval, the Company commenced operation of its Trading System on December 1, 2004. The Trading System operates on a trimester basis
commencing December 1, April 1 and September 1 of each year. In accordance with Section 10.9(b) of the Husker Ag Operating Agreement, the Husker Ag Board has established the trimester period as an interim transfer
period with respect to transfers affected through the Trading System.

The Trading System is intended to match a list of interested buyers with a
list of interested sellers, along with their non-firm price quotes. The Trading System does not automatically affect matches between potential sellers and buyers and it is the sole responsibility of sellers and buyers to contact each other to make a
determination as to whether an agreement to transfer Husker Ag membership units may be reached. There are detailed timelines that must be followed under the Trading System Rules and Procedures with respect to offers and sales of membership units.
All transactions must comply with the Husker Ag Trading Systems Rules and Procedures, the Husker Ag Operating Agreement, and are subject to approval by the Husker Ag Board of Directors.

The Husker Ag Trading System has been designed to comply with federal tax laws and IRS regulations establishing a qualified matching service, as well as state and federal securities laws. As a result,
transfers of Husker Ag membership units are strictly regulated, and the Nebraska Departments approval is based on representations made to the Nebraska Department concerning the operation of the Trading System, including the Husker Ag Trading
System Rules and Procedures. The Husker Ag Trading System Rules and Procedures are filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K, and are also available on the Husker Ag website, www.huskerag.com.

The Husker Ag Board of Directors has adopted a policy that the Trading System is intended to be the exclusive method of trading membership units for value in
transactions which would otherwise be applied against the Trading Systems 10% maximum annual limitation, except in extraordinary circumstances as determined by the Board in its sole discretion. Transfers such as bona fide gifts and transfers
upon death which are not included in the 10% annual maximum limitation are not included in the policy.

Holders

As of March 29, 2006, there were approximately 558 unit holders of the Companys membership units determined by an examination of the Companys transfer
book.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

Distributions

Effective September 17, 2003, the Husker Ag Board of Directors adopted the following policy with respect to the announcement of any future distributions to be made by Husker Ag to its members, in order to provide members, and any
persons considering the purchase of Husker Ag membership units, adequate prior notice of such distributions:

The Company will make a public
announcement of any distribution to members which has been approved by the Husker Ag Board of Directors within the 60 day period prior to the commencement of the calendar trimester in which the record date for the distribution would occur. The
calendar trimester commencement dates are December 1, April 1, and September 1, and the announcement by Husker Ag would include both the future record date for the distribution and the amount per membership unit of such
distribution.

The Company has declared and paid the following distributions since its inception through December 31, 2005:



|                  |  |                       |  |                 |       
|----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------- | ------
|Declaration Date  |  | Approximate Date Paid |  | Amount Per Unit
|December 23, 2003 |  | February 2, 2004      |  | $               | 150.00
|                  |  |                       |  |                 |       
|                  |  | Total for 2003        |  | $               | 150.00
|                  |  |                      
|April 20, 2004    |  | June 1, 2004          |  | $               | 200.00
|August 13, 2004   |  | September 15, 2004    |  | $               | 150.00
|November 12, 2004 |  | January 7, 2005       |  | $               | 100.00
|                  |  |                       |  |                 |       
|                  |  | Total for 2004        |  | $               | 450.00
|                  |  |                      
|March 29, 2005    |  | May 6, 2005           |  | $               | 100.00
|August 23, 2005   |  | September 16, 2005    |  | $               | 150.00
|November 22, 2005 |  | December 20, 2005     |  | $               | 200.00
|                  |  |                       |  |                 |       
|                  |  | Total for 2005        |  | $               | 450.00

The Companys lender, Union Bank and Trust Company (Union Bank) and former lender, Stearns Bank,
N.A. (Stearns Bank), approved each of these distributions as required under the Companys existing loan agreements with Union Bank and Stearns Bank, respectively.

Any distributions are payable at the discretion of the Husker Ag Board of Directors, subject to the provisions of the Nebraska Limited Liability Company Act, and the Husker Ag Operating Agreement. The Board of
Directors has no obligation to distribute profits, if any, to members, and there can be no assurance as to the ability of Husker Ag to declare or pay distributions in the future. In addition, the terms of the permanent debt financing agreements
entered into by Husker Ag with Union Bank place certain restrictions on the Companys ability to makes distributions.

First, the Company must be in
compliance with all of its loan covenants with Union Bank prior to making any distributions in the future. In addition, any distributions in excess of 35% of the Companys net income require prior approval from Union Bank.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Husker Ag currently has no equity compensation plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from
Unregistered Securities

Husker Ag had no unregistered sales of securities during the past three fiscal years.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Husker Ag

None.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(In thousands, except per membership unit amounts)



|                                                |  |      |          |     |      |   |          |  |         |          |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -------- | --- | ---- | - | -------- |  | ------- | -------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                |  | 2005 |          |     | 2004 |   | 2003(1)  |  | 2002(2) |         
|Net sales                                       |  | $    | 47,224   |     |      | $ | 47,785   |  | $       | 34,337   |  | $ |        |  
|Net income (loss)                               |  | $    | 10,092   |     |      | $ | 9,768    |  | $       | 7,996    |  | $ | (1,543  | )
|Earnings (loss) per membership unit             |  | $    | 658.86   |     |      | $ | 637.70   |  | $       | 522.01   |  | $ | (100.76 | )
|Cash distributions declared per membership unit |  | $    | 450.00   |     |      | $ | 450.00   |  | $       | 150.00   |  | $ |        |  
|Book value per membership unit(3)               |  | $    | 1,607.19 |     |      | $ | 1,398.33 |  | $       | 1,210.63 |  | $ | 837.40  |  
|Total assets                                    |  | $    | 40,145   | (4) |      | $ | 42,307   |  | $       | 42,282   |  | $ | 25,721  |  
|Total debt (current and long-term)              |  | $    | 13,575   | (5) |      | $ | 16,107   |  | $       | 19,862   |  | $ | 10,192  |  
|Members equity                                 |  | $    | 24,619   |     |      | $ | 21,420   |  | $       | 18,544   |  | $ | 12,847  |  

---

|(1) |  Fiscal year 2003 represents only a partial year of operating because the Company did not begin production of ethanol until March 2003 and did not reach
name-plate capacity until the second quarter of 2003.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  The Company was in start-up phase during 2002 and therefore had no operating revenue during fiscal year 2002.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) |  Members equity divided by membership units outstanding as of the end of the period.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) |  Total assets went down by approximately $2.2 million from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2005 primarily due to the Companys use of cash to
pay down long-term debt by over $7 million. This reduction in debt was offset by other factors (such as the Companys net income less distributions) that are set forth in more detail in the Companys financial statements included below
under Item 8.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) |  Includes subscription payable.
|--- | --------------------------------

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking
Statements

Husker Ag and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements made in
this report, that represent Husker Ags expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including statements regarding future sales, future profits and other results of operations, the continuation of historical trends, the sufficiency of
cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for Husker Ags future liquidity and capital resource needs, and the effects of any regulatory changes. Such statements are forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Husker Ag cautions you that any forward-looking statements made by Husker Ag in this report, in other reports filed by Husker Ag with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in
other announcements by Husker Ag are qualified by certain risks and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and factors include, but are not limited to,
the risk factors set forth in the section above entitled RISK FACTORS.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Overview

The Company
owns and operates an ethanol plant located near Plainview, Nebraska. Husker Ags business consists of the production of ethanol and an ethanol co-product, distillers grains. The Company began grinding corn and producing ethanol in March 2003.
Currently the ethanol plant converts roughly nine million bushels of corn into approximately 25 million gallons of ethanol per year. The ethanol plant also currently produces and sells over 160,000 tons of modified wet distillers grain on an
annual basis.

Husker Ags operating results are largely driven by the prices at which it sells ethanol and distillers grain and the costs related to
its production. The price of ethanol and distillers grain is influenced by factors such as supply and demand, prices of unleaded gasoline and substitute products, weather, government policies and programs, and foreign trade. Although federal and
state government support programs have been a significant source of revenue and income since Husker Ag began production in March of 2003, the federal program is now much less significant because of the means by which the program structures, funds,
and conditions the payments (see Energy Production Credits under Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 below for further discussion of this issue). With respect to the various costs in the
production process, the two most significant are the costs of corn and natural gas. The cost of natural gas and corn is affected by factors such as supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs, foreign trade, and the risk management
or hedging strategy used to protect against the price volatility of these commodities. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk below for additional information.

Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

The following table shows sales and revenues, cost of sales, loss on options, operating expenses and other items as a percentage of total sales and revenues as derived from the Companys Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. This table should be read in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and accompanying notes under Item 8 of this Form 10-K:



|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ---- | ----- | -- |  | - | ----------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                              |  | 2005 |             |   | 2004 |      
|Sales and revenues                            |  | $    | 47,224,468  |   |      | 100.0 | %  |  | $ | 47,785,060  |   |  | 100.0 | % 
|Cost of sales                                 |  |      | (32,692,390 | ) |      | (69.2 | )% |  |   | (34,190,792 | ) |  | (71.6 | )%
|Loss on options                               |  |      | (1,807,964  | ) |      | (3.8  | )% |  |   | (1,612,429  | ) |  | (3.4  | )%
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Gross profit                                  |  |      | 12,724,114  |   |      | 27.0  | %  |  |   | 11,981,839  |   |  | 25.0  | % 
|Selling, general and administrative expenses  |  |      | (2,266,188  | ) |      | (4.8  | )% |  |   | (1,571,628  | ) |  | (3.3  | )%
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Operating income                              |  |      | 10,457,926  |   |      | 22.2  | %  |  |   | 10,410,211  |   |  | 21.7  | % 
|Interest expense                              |  |      | (668,533    | ) |      | (1.4  | )% |  |   | (1,010,846  | ) |  | (2.1  | )%
|Interest and other income                     |  |      | 328,406     |   |      | 0.7   | %  |  |   | 368,982     |   |  | 0.8   | % 
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Income before equity in net loss of affiliate |  |      | 10,117,799  |   |      | 21.5  | %  |  |   | 9,768,347   |   |  | 20.4  | % 
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Equity in net loss of affiliate               |  |      | (25,362     | ) |      | (0.1  | )% |  |   |            |   |  |      |   
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Net income                                    |  | $    | 10,092,437  |   |      | 21.4  | %  |  | $ | 9,768,347   |   |  | 20.4  | % 
|                                              |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Sales and Revenues

The Companys sales and revenues are divided into three main categories including ethanol sales, distillers grain sales and energy production credits. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, ethanol
sales comprised 81.1% and 74.2%, respectively, of total net sales. Distillers grain sales comprised 12.9% and 15.3% of the Companys total net sales for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively; while federal and state
energy production credits make up the remaining 6.0% and 10.5% of the Companys total net sales for 2005 and 2004, respectively. If energy production credits are excluded, ethanol sales represent 86.3% and 82.9%, and distillers grain sales
represent 13.7% and 17.1%, of the total revenue of the Company from the sales of its products for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Net
sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 decreased by approximately $561,000, or 1.2% over the prior year. This decrease in net sales in 2005 compared to 2004 resulted from decreases in distiller grain sales of approximately $1.2 million and
energy production credits of approximately $2.2 million, partially offset by an increase in ethanol sales of approximately $2.9 million. These individual categories of net sales are discussed further below.

Ethanol Sales

Ethanol sales for
calendar year 2005 increased by 8.1% over the prior year. This is primarily due to an increase of 10.2% in the average price received per gallon for 2005 over 2004.

The vast majority of ethanol sold during 2005 was sold pursuant to a forward contract. At December 31, 2005, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of approximately 19.9 million gallons of ethanol
with fixed prices ranging from $1.20 to $2.10 per gallon and 1.7 million gallons at variable prices to be delivered through December 2006.

Distillers Grain Sales

Sales of distillers grain decreased by $1.2 million, or 16.7% for 2005 compared to 2004.
Since the price of distillers grain has a close relationship to the price of corn, this decrease in distillers grain sales resulted from a decrease in corn prices. The Companys average price of corn decreased by over 9.4% for 2005 compared to
2004. By comparison, the Companys average sales price per ton of distillers grain decreased by 16.9% from 2004 to 2005, which accounted for the Companys decrease in distillers grain sales.

Energy Production Credits

Net sales
included approximately $2.8 million of energy production credits for the year ended December 31, 2005, which is approximately $2.2 million less than the net production credits earned in 2004. This reduction is entirely due to a decrease in
federal production credits earned. As explained further below, this decrease in federal credits is due to the Company operating at or near full production for both years with only minimal increases in ethanol production in 2005 compared to the prior
year.

Energy production credits for 2005 are nearly exclusively from the State of Nebraska, offset by a very small net adjustment for federal credits.
Credits earned from the State of Nebraska during both 2005 and 2004 were approximately $2,812,000. The Companys net income for 2005 without the energy production credits included in net sales would have been approximately $7.3 million
(compared to actual net income of approximately $10.1 million).

While the producer credits from the State of Nebraska should remain relatively consistent
for 2006 (subject to appropriate financing by the Nebraska Legislature; see Risk Factors above), the Company expects calendar year 2006 revenues from the federal program to be insignificant. The Company therefore anticipates that, as
compared to 2003 and 2004, its sales of ethanol and distillers grain will continue to constitute a larger percentage of the Companys total net sales during 2006 and beyond.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Energy Credits  Federal Program. The ethanol producer credits from the federal government have in the past
included incentive revenue from the United States Department of Agricultures Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) under its Bioenergy Program. Under this program, the CCC makes payments to eligible bioenergy producers to encourage
increased purchases of agricultural commodities, such as corn, for the purpose of expanding production of bioenergy and to encourage the construction of new production capacity. Cash payments to eligible ethanol producers are based on the increase
in gallons of ethanol produced from the prior federal fiscal year (which is an October 1 to September 30 fiscal year) and the market price of corn at the end of each quarter, with a more favorable calculation structure used for producers
who generate less than 65 million gallons of ethanol annually.

Since the plant was operating at nearly full capacity for all of 2004, there was only
a minimal increase in production during 2005. Accordingly, the Company did not earn any federal ethanol producer credits during calendar year 2005. The Company does not anticipate receiving any payment from this program in the foreseeable future.

Energy Credits  Nebraska Program. In addition to Bioenergy Program cash incentives, LB 536, a State of Nebraska legislative bill which came
into law on May 31, 2001, established a production tax credit of 18¢ per gallon of ethanol produced during a 96 consecutive month period by newly constructed ethanol facilities in production prior to June 30, 2004. The tax credit
is only available to offset Nebraska motor fuels excise taxes. The tax credit is transferable and therefore Husker Ag transfers credits received to a Nebraska gasoline retailer who then reimburses Husker Ag for the face value of the credit amount
less a handling fee. On March 24, 2003, Husker Ag entered into an agreement with Rite Way Oil & Gas Co., Inc. (Rite Way) pursuant to which Husker Ag may transfer up to $500,000 in ethanol production credits to Rite Way per
month. Rite Way then pays Husker Ag the credit amount less a handling fee. No producer can receive tax credits for more than 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol produced in one year and no producer will receive tax credits for more than 125 million
gallons of ethanol produced over the consecutive 96 month period. The minimum production level for a plant to qualify for credits is 100,000 gallons of ethanol annually. The production incentive is scheduled to expire June 30, 2012. Assuming
the Company continues to produce at least 15,625,000 gallons of ethanol annually, this producer tax credit could result in payments of up to $2,812,500 to the Company annually, subject to the statutory maximum limit. Any changes to existing state
law, regulations or programs could have an adverse effect on the Companys revenue. See Risk Factors above.

This program may not have
sufficient funds to cover the allocations to eligible producers in future years. Husker Ag is currently unable to predict whether there may be a funding shortfall and what the effect such a shortfall would have on the Companys allocation.

Loss on Option and Futures Contracts

In an attempt to minimize the effects of the volatility of corn and natural gas costs and other inputs on operating profits, Husker Ag has taken hedging positions in corn and natural gas futures and option markets.
Similarly, in an attempt to minimize the effects of market volatility of the Companys gas-plus forward contracts for the sale of ethanol, Husker Ag has taken hedging positions in unleaded gas futures and options markets.

Hedging means protecting the price at which the Company buys corn and natural gas and the price at which it will sell its products in the future. It is a way to attempt
to reduce the risk caused by price fluctuation. The effectiveness of hedging activities is dependent upon, among other things, the cost of corn, natural gas and unleaded gas as well as Husker Ags ability to sell sufficient amounts of ethanol
and distillers grain to utilize all of the commodities subject to the option and futures contracts. Hedging activities can result in costs to the Company because price movements in grain, natural gas and unleaded gas contracts are highly volatile
and are influenced by many factors which are beyond the Companys control.

The Company enters into option and futures contracts, which are designated
as hedges of specific volumes of corn and natural gas projected to be used in the manufacturing process and ethanol expected to be sold. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the exposure to price risk related to corn and
natural gas purchases and ethanol sales. The Company currently does not meet the



19



---

##### Table of Contents

requirements for cash flow hedging under FASB 133. The Company has entered into a risk management agreement with FCStone, LLC (FCStone), a
commodities risk management firm, under which FCStone provides the Company with advice, assistance and a price risk management program for corn products necessary for the operation of the plant. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had
purchased put options on approximately 500,000 bushels of corn inventory. These put options were intended to protect against a price decline on the corn that was purchased using futures contracts. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had open
long positions for 40,000 bushels of price protection ranging from $2.20 to $2.40 per bushel and open futures positions of 450,000 bushels of price protection ranging from $2.32 to $2.36 per bushel. The Company has recorded these positions at their
fair value. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk below for additional information.

The Company has also retained
Husker Trading, Inc. to originate and acquire corn for plant usage rather than hiring an on-site commodities manager. Husker Trading, Inc. is responsible for the consistent scheduling of grain deliveries and to establish and fill forward contracts
through grain elevators. It also coordinates grain deliveries between the railroad, participating elevators and producers, as well as negotiates price protection with hedging specialists.

In February 2004, the Husker Ag Board of Directors adopted a Risk Management Policy, which established a Risk Management Committee to serve as the liaison between
management and Board regarding forward pricing and risk management issues. The Risk Management Committee is currently comprised of General Manager Seth Harder, and Board members Stanley Gyberg, Mike Kinney, David Stearns and Leonard Wostrel. The
Risk Management Policy also establishes position limits and forward pricing guidelines with respect to risk exposure for corn, distillers grain, denaturant and natural gas, as well as approval procedures for management and the Risk Management
Committee, approved commodity transaction instruments, and reporting and accounting function verification requirements.

The Company uses natural gas as
its main source of energy. Natural gas prices have historically fluctuated significantly. Increases in the price of natural gas would harm the Company by increasing its energy costs. An increase in the price of natural gas has a direct impact on the
Companys costs to produce ethanol. For this reason, the Company began purchasing option and futures contracts on natural gas for the first time in January 2005.

A relatively small percentage of the Companys forward contracts for the sale of ethanol are priced as gas-plus contracts where the Company receives a price per gallon of ethanol sold equal to the
then average unleaded gas price per gallon plus a fixed amount. Since unleaded gas prices fluctuate, decreases in gasoline prices cause the Companys revenues on these gas-plus contracts to decrease. Therefore, as part of its hedging strategy,
the Company also began purchasing option and futures contracts on unleaded gas for the first time in January 2005.

The Companys net income for the
year ended December 31, 2005, included net realized and unrealized loss on option and futures contracts in the amount of $1,807,964. This amount consists of a loss on contracts on corn of $1,510,945 and a loss of $297,019 on natural and
unleaded gas contracts.

Market conditions during 2005 were relatively unfavorable for the Companys option and futures contracts on corn and natural
and unleaded gas. Unless these conditions begin to change, the Company may expect to realize additional losses on option and futures contracts in the future.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company reported a loss on option and futures contracts in the amount of $1,612,429 comprised solely by corn hedging. This loss generally resulted from falling corn prices during the year.

Cost of Sales

Husker
Ags cost of sales includes production expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Companys cost of sales, as a percentage of total net sales, was 69.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In actual dollars, cost of sales
decreased by 4.4 percent in 2005 compared to 2004.

Cost of sales primarily consists of purchases of corn and both natural gas and natural gasoline.
Natural gas is used in the production process while natural gasoline is used as a denaturant. Corn costs



20



---

##### Table of Contents

comprised 59.67% and 63.2% of total cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively. Natural gas and the denaturant made up
18.4% and 16.6% of cost of sales for the years of 2005 and 2004, respectively. The average price of corn for 2004 was $2.34 per bushel compared to $2.12 in 2005, a decrease of approximately 9.4%. This resulted in a savings of over $2.1 million in
corn purchases during 2005 compared to the prior year. However, this savings was partially offset by an increase of nearly $575,000 in natural gas purchases due to increased energy costs.

Depending upon the corn and gas markets, the Company expects to continue to experience efficiencies in the operation of its plant during 2006. However, the
Companys cost of sales is largely dependent upon the corn and gas markets.

Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses

For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Companys selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total
net sales excluding energy production credits, were 5.1% and 3.7%, respectively. The Companys selling, general and administrative expenses increased by over $690,000 or 44.2% for 2005 compared to 2004. This large increase was due to
(i) the Companys refinancing of its long term debt in February, 2005 which resulted in prepayment penalties in the amount of approximately $310,000; and (ii) the write-off of the Companys remaining unamortized debt origination
costs from its initial financing with Stearns Bank in the approximate amount of $560,000 which were being amortized over the life of the original loan. After accounting for these expenses, the Companys selling, general and administrative
expenses for 2005 decreased from 2004. For 2006, Husker Ag anticipates that selling, general and administrative expenses will remain in a range consistent with prior years as a percentage of the Companys net sales excluding energy production
credits.

Equity in Net Loss of Affiliate

On December 28, 2005, the Company signed a subscription agreement to invest $6 million for a 24.1% equity interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company with a principal place of business in
Ord, Nebraska (Val-E). Val-E is currently building a 45 million gallon ethanol plant in Ord, Nebraska. The Company was required to make a deposit in the amount of $1.5 million when it signed the subscription agreement. The Company
recorded the remaining $4.5 million due under the subscription agreement as a subscription payable on its December 31, 2005, balance sheet. This debt was subsequently refinanced on January 4, 2006 as a five year term note with Union Bank
and Trust Company. For additional information regarding this investment, see General Developments above under Item 1 of this Form 10-K, along with Note 4 of the Companys Financial Statements included under Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income for the year ended December 31, 2005, consisted of $210,201 of interest income and $118,205 of other income. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company had interest income of
$128,462 and other income of $240,520. Interest income was slightly higher in 2005 primarily due to higher interest rates and the Companys investment of some of its available cash in short-term certificates of deposit. The substantial decrease
in other income is due to a one time USDA-Value Added Grant of $226,850 that was received in 2004.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005, was $668,533 compared to $1,010,846 for the year ended December 31, 2004. This
decrease is due to the refinancing of the long-term debt during the first quarter of 2005 (see the section entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources below) which decreased the interest rate on, and the amount of, the principal portion of
long-term debt.

Net Income

Net income for Husker Ag for 2005 was approximately $10 million, consisting mostly of income from operations of approximately $10.4 million, along with approximately $118,000 of other income and $210,000 of interest income, and partially
offset by approximately $669,000 of interest expense and an



21



---

##### Table of Contents

equity loss of roughly $25,000 from the Companys partial ownership of Val-E Ethanol, LLC (referred to as equity in net loss of an affiliate
for accounting purposes). Income from operations for 2005 included an approximate $1.8 million loss on option and futures contracts, which includes both the actual net losses on option and futures contracts closed during 2005 and the change during
the twelve months in the market value of option and futures contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. As noted above, the Companys net income for 2005 without the state and federal production credits included would have been
approximately $7.3 million. As explained further above, Husker Ags net income in 2006 is expected to include significantly less production credits than what the Company received two years ago in 2004 because the Company reported essentially no
income from federal producer credits for calendar year 2005 compared to over $2.2 million in 2004.

By comparison, the Company experienced net income for
2004 in the approximate amount of $9.8 million, largely due to income from operations of approximately $10.4 million, and approximately $241,000 of other income and $128,000 of interest income partially offset by interest expense in the approximate
amount of $1 million. Income from operations for 2004 included an approximate $1.6 million loss on option and futures contracts.

For the reasons set forth
above, the Companys net income for 2005 was approximately $324,000 more than in 2004.

Results of Operations for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003

The following table shows sales and revenues, cost of sales, loss on options, operating expenses and other items as a percentage of total
sales and revenues as derived from the Companys Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. This table should be read in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and accompanying notes under
Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company did not begin operating at name plate capacity until the second quarter of 2003. Accordingly, the
Companys income, production and sales data for 2003 represents less than a full year of operations, and any comparisons between fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2004 should be reviewed with this important distinction in mind.



|                                             |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ---- | ----- | -- |  | - | ----------- | - |  | ----- | --
|                                             |  | 2004 |             |   | 2003 |      
|Sales and revenues                           |  | $    | 47,785,060  |   |      | 100.0 | %  |  | $ | 34,337,034  |   |  | 100.0 | % 
|Cost of sales                                |  |      | (34,190,792 | ) |      | (71.6 | )% |  |   | (24,715,318 | ) |  | (72.0 | )%
|Gain (loss) on options                       |  |      | (1,612,429  | ) |      | (3.4  | )% |  |   | 159,238     |   |  | 0.5   | % 
|                                             |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Gross profit                                 |  |      | 11,981,839  |   |      | 25.0  | %  |  |   | 9,780,954   |   |  | 28.5  | % 
|Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |      | (1,571,628  | ) |      | (3.3  | )% |  |   | (1,098,188  | ) |  | (3.2  | )%
|                                             |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Operating income                             |  |      | 10,410,211  |   |      | 21.7  | %  |  |   | 8,682,766   |   |  | 25.3  | % 
|Interest expense                             |  |      | (1,010,846  | ) |      | (2.1  | )% |  |   | (724,001    | ) |  | (2.1  | )%
|Interest and other income                    |  |      | 368,982     |   |      | 0.8   | %  |  |   | 37,378      |   |  | 0.1   | % 
|                                             |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   
|Net income                                   |  | $    | 9,768,347   |   |      | 20.4  | %  |  | $ | 7,996,143   |   |  | 23.3  | % 
|                                             |  |      |             |   |      |       |    |  |   |             |   |  |       |   

Sales and Revenues

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, ethanol sales comprised 74.2% and 64.5%, respectively, of total net sales. Distillers grain sales comprised 15.3% and
14.0% of the Companys total net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively; while federal and state energy production credits make up the remaining 10.5% and 21.5% of the Companys total net sales for the years
of 2004 and 2003, respectively. If energy production credits are excluded, ethanol sales represent 82.9% and 82.2%, and distillers grain sales represent 17.1% and 17.8%, of the total revenue of the Company from the sales of its products for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Ethanol Sales

Ethanol sales for 2004 increased by 59.9% over the prior year. This was primarily due to an approximate 33% increase in the production of ethanol or 6.5 million gallons over 2003. Production did not begin until
March of 2003; therefore, 2004 production numbers have two additional months of production for comparison purposes.

Distillers Grain Sales

Sales of distillers grain increased by over $2.5 million, or 52.4% for 2004 compared to 2003. This sales increase is
largely due to an increase of production of over 41.2% or approximately 50,000 tons from 2003 to 2004.

Energy
Production Credits

Net sales included approximately $5.0 million of energy production credits for the year ended December 31, 2004, which compares
to net production credits earned during 2003 of roughly $7.4 million. Credits from the State of Nebraska remained relatively consistent for 2004 compared to 2003. However, for reasons explained above, federal credits for 2004 decreased by
approximately $2.4 million over the prior year.

The Companys net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 without the energy production
credits included in net sales would have been approximately $4.8 million (compared to actual net income of approximately $9.8 million). Both federal and Nebraska credits are discussed in detail above.

Gain or Loss on Option and Futures Contracts

The Companys net income for 2004 included net realized and unrealized losses on option and futures contracts in the amount of $1,612,429. Market conditions for corn during 2004 were very unfavorable for the Companys option and
futures contracts creating the majority of this loss.

For 2003, the Company reported a gain on option and futures contracts in the amount of $159,238
comprised solely from corn hedging. This hedging gain was due to a significant increase in corn contract prices during the third and fourth quarters of 2003.

Cost of Sales

For the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Companys cost of sales, as a percentage of total net sales, was 71.6% and 72.0%, respectively. After excluding energy production credits from the Companys net sales for both 2004 and 2003, the
Companys cost of sales as a percentage of such adjusted net sales decreased by 12.8% from 2003 to 2004. In actual dollars, cost of sales increased by 38.3% from the 2004 compared to 2003. Corn costs comprised 63.2% and 62.1% of total cost of
sales for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. Natural gas and the denaturant made up 16.7% and 15.6% of cost of sales for 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company experienced an increase in costs of approximately $6.3 million in the cost of corn purchased for year ended December 31, 2004, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase in
expenses was primarily a result of having two additional months of production in 2004 over 2003. The Company also experienced an increase in cost of sales in other miscellaneous costs due to the additional production during 2004.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Companys selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total net sales excluding energy production credits, were 3.7% and 4.1%, respectively. Excluding
ethanol supports, the Companys net sales increased by approximately $15.8



23



---

##### Table of Contents

million or 58.6% from 2003 to 2004, while the Companys selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $473,000 or 43.1%. This
increase is generally due to the additional expenses incurred due to the plant being fully operational during all of 2004 and is consistent with the Companys corresponding increase in its net sales.

Interest and Other Income

Interest
and other income for the year ended December 31, 2004, consisted of $128,462 of interest income and $240,520 of other income. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company had interest income of $21,024 and other income of $16,354.
Interest income was much higher in 2004 due to large amounts of cash equivalents held by the Company during the year, especially near the end of the year. Other income for 2004 consisted primarily of a grant from the USDA in the amount of $226,850.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, was $1,010,846 compared to $724,001 for the prior year ended December 31, 2003. This increase is due to general increases in the interest rates on the Companys long term
debt during 2003 and 2004 as well as the Companys pre-production capitalized interest. These increases were offset somewhat by the declining balance of the Companys long-term debt.

Before the Company began producing ethanol in March 2003, all of the interest accrued on its outstanding long-term debt was capitalized. Therefore, nearly three months
of the interest accrued during 2003 was not included in interest expense. The increases in the Companys interest rates stem from a gradual increase during the past two calendar years in the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate to which the
Companys long-term debt has been tied. In addition, in late 2003, the Companys then primary lender, Stearns Bank, increased the interest rates on its loans from 0.50% over the Prime Rate to 1.25% over the Prime Rate.

Net Income

Net income for Husker Ag
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $9.8 million, consisting of income from operations of approximately $10.4 million, and approximately $241,000 of other income and $128,000 of interest income offset by approximately $1.0
million of interest expense. Net income from operations for 2004 included an approximate $1.6 million loss on option and futures contracts, which includes both the actual net loss on option and futures contracts closed during 2004 and the change
during the year in the market value on option and futures contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. As noted above, the Companys net income for 2004 without the state and federal production credits included would have been
approximately $4.8 million.

The net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $8 million, consisting of income from operations of
approximately $8.7 million, along with approximately $16,000 of other income and $21,000 of interest income offset by approximately $724,000 of interest expense. Net income from operations for 2003 included a gain on option and futures contracts in
the approximate amount of $159,000.

Despite the fact that federal and state production credits were approximately $2.4 million less in 2004 than the prior
year, the Companys net income for 2004 increased by approximately $1.8 million over 2003. This was primarily due to the fact that the Company operated at or near full capacity for all of 2004 compared to less than nine months of optimal
operations in 2003. Moreover, conditions for the ethanol plant were very good in 2004; including relatively high ethanol prices coupled with moderate corn prices.

Trends that may Impact the Companys Future Operating Results

Demand and Prices for Ethanol
Products

Demand and the corresponding prices for ethanol products can vary significantly over time and decreases in price levels could adversely affect
Husker Ags profitability and viability. The price for ethanol has some relation to the price for gasoline. The price of ethanol tends to increase as the price of gasoline increases, and the price of ethanol tends to decrease as the price of
gasoline decreases. Any lowering of gasoline prices may also lead to lower prices for ethanol and adversely affect the Companys operating results.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2005, high oil prices and continued MTBE bans resulted in strong ethanol demand and record high ethanol prices.
However, because the ethanol industry has been dependent upon government supports, and more importantly, because the production capacity for ethanol is increasing so rapidly, there can be no assurance that the demand for ethanol will keep up with
its supply in the near future  regardless of what happens to the price of gasoline.

Government supports

As discussed above, current federal law is favorable to ethanol because it mandates certain oxygenate blending. In addition, as noted above in Item 1, the Renewable
Fuels Standard (RFS) established by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 mandates that fuel refiners use a certain minimum amount of ethanol and biodiesel. While the RFS may not have an immediate impact on the ethanol market since current
national ethanol production capacity exceeds the 2006 RFS requirement of 4 billion gallons, it is possible that the increased RFS requirement of 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuel by 2012 may help support the ethanol industry in the long-term.

MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether) remains ethanols major competitor as the oxygenate most used for gasoline. MTBE continues to come under scrutiny
because of ground water contamination and perceived health effects on humans. Currently 20 states have enacted legislation that bans or restricts the use of MTBE, including California, New York and Connecticut which each instituted a ban on MTBE
effective January 1, 2004. Several other states are considering MTBE bans.

If federal law is not changed in this regard and if MTBE usage continues
to be reduced, the ethanol industry should see stronger demand. On the other hand, the elimination of the oxygen requirement in gasoline without adopting a similar incentive for ethanol blending, could have a significantly negative impact on both
ethanol demand and pricing.

Production of ethanol

As
noted above, with the new ethanol plants and plant expansions currently under construction along with new construction expected in the near future, the nationwide production capacity for ethanol is expected to increase dramatically in the next
couple of years. Experts in the ethanol industry have differing views as to whether this increased production will create a surplus in the ethanol market. At a minimum, this increased capacity creates some uncertainty for the ethanol industry.
Although the Company believes that there will be an increase in the demand for ethanol as a result of the phase out of MTBE, Husker Ag cannot provide any assurance or guarantee that there will be any material or significant increases in the demand
for ethanol. If the production of ethanol exceeds either the demand for ethanol or the petroleum industrys ability to blend ethanol with gasoline, then the price of ethanol would be expected to fall, and such fall in ethanol prices could be
significant. In that case, the Companys revenues would decrease accordingly.

The increased production of ethanol could have other adverse effects as
well. For example, the increased production will also lead to increased supplies of co-products from the production of ethanol, such as distillers grain/solubles. Those increased supplies could lead to lower prices for those co-products. Also, the
increased production of ethanol could result in increased demand for corn which could in turn lead to higher prices for corn, resulting in higher costs of production and lower profits.

Inputs

Corn

The Company uses corn as its primary feedstock. Rising corn prices produce lower profit margins for the production of ethanol and therefore, represent unfavorable market
conditions. Similarly, decreases in the price of corn may increase revenues to the Company and therefore, would increase the profitability of the Company. The corn market is dependent upon a variety of factors unrelated to the ethanol market. The



25



---

##### Table of Contents

price of corn is generally dependent upon the regional and international grain supplies, which can be very volatile. Corn supplies and the resultant prices
are affected by weather, governmental policy, disease and other conditions.

Grain markets were somewhat unstable during much of 2004. During 2004, corn
prices started the year at recent highs. However, after the record U.S. crop was harvested later in the year, corn prices moderated significantly and ended the year at relatively low levels. Corn prices remained moderate throughout 2005. Management
expects corn prices to remain moderate to higher for the first half of 2006. However, after that corn prices will be largely dependent on the corn crop grown during the summer of 2006. A significant reduction in the quantity of corn harvested could
result in increased corn costs which would increase the Companys cost to produce ethanol. See section entitled Risk Factors above.

Utilities

Changes in the cost of utilities may also have a material impact on the profitability of the Company. Ethanol production requires
a constant and consistent supply of energy. If there is any interruption in Husker Ags supply of energy for whatever reason, such as supply, delivery or mechanical problems, the Company may be required to halt production. Increases in the
price of natural gas would harm Husker Ags business by increasing its energy costs. During 2004 and 2005, the price of natural gas was above its historical average, increasing the cost to the Company to produce ethanol. While natural gas
prices have historically fluctuated significantly, Husker Ag expects that natural gas prices will remain high throughout the remainder of 2006, especially in the winter months.

The Company also needs to purchase significant amounts of electricity to operate the plant. The prices which Husker Ag is required to pay for electrical power will have a direct impact on its costs of producing
ethanol and its financial results.

Other

In addition
to general market fluctuations and economic conditions, Husker Ag could experience significant cost increases associated with the on-going operation of the plant caused by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond the Companys control.
Labor costs can increase over time, particularly if there is any shortage of labor, or shortage of persons with the skills necessary to operate the ethanol plant. Changes in price, operation and availability of truck and rail transportation may
affect the Companys profitability with respect to the transportation of ethanol and other products to its customers. In addition, the operation of the ethanol plant is subject to ongoing compliance with all applicable governmental regulations,
such as those regulations governing pollution control, ethanol production, grain purchasing and other matters. If any of these regulations were to change, it could cost Husker Ag significantly more to comply with them. Further, other regulations may
arise in future years regarding the operation of the ethanol plant, including the possibility of required additional permits and licenses. Husker Ag might have difficulty obtaining any such additional permits or licenses, and they could involve
significant unanticipated costs. Husker Ag will be subject to all of those regulations whether or not the operation of the ethanol plant is profitable.

Books and Records

Husker Ag currently relies on its internal staff for the maintenance of its books and records. Husker Ag has employed an
internal accountant, who is primarily responsible for the maintenance of its accounting books and records. Such person is assisted by full time office administrative personnel, all of whom are responsible for compliance with the rules and
regulations promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 concerning the maintenance of accurate books and records.

Liquidity and Capital
Resources

The Companys liquidity and capital resources will be affected in the short-term by its planned plant expansion which is discussed in
detail above. See General Developments above under Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion on this proposed expansion.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had current assets of approximately $8.6 million, including cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $5.1 million and the Company had total assets of approximately $40 million. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had current liabilities totaling approximately $4.2 million. As of December 31, 2005, the
Companys ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.06 to one, compared to 2.09 to one as of December 31, 2004.

As of
December 31, 2005, the Company had total members equity of approximately $24.6 million, or $1,607.19 per unit. This represents an increase of 14.9% when compared to total members equity of approximately $21.4 million, or $1,398.33
per unit as of December 31, 2004. Total members equity was approximately $18.5 million, or $1,210.63 per unit as of December 31, 2003. Members equity increased by $3,199,337 during 2005 due to net income for the period in the
amount of $10,092,437 offset by distributions declared in the amount of $6,893,100.

Cash Flow from Operating Activities. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company generated cash flow from operations of approximately $12.4 million, consisting, among several other material items, of net income from operations before depreciation and amortization in the amount of approximately
$12.3 million. The operating activities of Husker Ag for the year ended December 31, 2004, generated approximately $15.2 million of net cash flow, which primarily included net income from operations before depreciation and amortization of
approximately $12 million.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash used for investing
activities totaled approximately $3.5 million which included $805,000 to purchase property and equipment, $1,500,000 payment on the purchase of an interest in an equity method investee (Val-E Ethanol, LLC), and $1.5 million to purchase certificates
of deposit. This was offset by $9,000 received from the sale of equipment and a $345,000 sales tax refund on equipment. This use of cash in 2005 for investing activities compares to approximately $651,000 of cash used for investing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2004, all of which was used to purchase property and equipment.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities. Cash used for
financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005, totaled approximately $15.5 million, consisting of distributions paid to members ($8,424,900) and net payments on long-term debt including debt origination costs ($17,071,604). As
discussed in detail below, these payments were offset by a loan to the Company in the amount of $10,000,000. This compares to the cash used for financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2004, in the amount of approximately $11.8
million, consisting primarily of distributions paid to members ($7,659,000) and payments on the construction loan and other long-term debt including debt origination costs ($4,168,550).

Primary Company Debt. Prior to February 23, 2005, the senior and primary lender for Husker Ag was Stearns Bank, N.A., St. Cloud, Minnesota (Stearns Bank). The Company financed the construction
of its ethanol plant through Stearns Bank. From October 3, 2002 through December 31, 2003, the Company borrowed a total of $19,827,860 from Stearns Bank under its construction loan. On January 20, 2004, the Company converted its
construction loan into three permanent loans. In June 2004, the Company paid off the smallest of the three loans (original principal amount of $1,505,900).

On February 22, 2005, the Company signed a Commercial Loan Agreement with Union Bank and Trust Company, Lincoln, Nebraska (Union Bank) and Midwest Bank National Association, Plainview, Nebraska (Midwest Bank),
whereby Union Bank and Midwest Bank agreed to loan Husker Ag the funds necessary to refinance the Companys outstanding obligations with Stearns Bank and to provide the Company with a revolving line of credit. On February 23, 2005, Husker
Ag used the proceeds from its new loan with Union Bank, along with approximately $5.8 million of its cash reserves, to pay off its obligation to Stearns Bank in full. The total payoff was approximately $15.8 million which included a prepayment
penalty of approximately $310,000.

Union Bank and Midwest Bank made the following loans to Husker Ag on February 23, 2005, pursuant to the Commercial
Loan Agreement and the resultant promissory notes (collectively the New Loans):

1. Union Bank  single advance term loan
in the amount of $10,000,000. This term note is amortized over a seven year period with a final maturity on February 22, 2012. This note is payable in equal monthly installments of $119,050 plus interest. The interest rate on this note is fixed
at 6.20% for the first five years. Thereafter, the interest rate will be the then 2-year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate plus 3.00%.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

2. Midwest Bank  multiple advance revolving line of credit loan with maximum borrowings of
$5,000,000. Interest is due monthly on this revolving line of credit and principal is due annually. This note will accrue interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 0.75% adjusted monthly (the WSJ Prime Rate was 7.50% at March 1, 2006,
with a resultant interest rate of 8.25% through March 31, , 2006). Husker Ag intends to utilize this line of credit when needed for operating purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Company executed an Extension Agreement with Midwest Bank,
whereby Midwest Bank agreed to extend the Companys revolving line of credit until April 30, 2006. Other than this extension, there were no changes to the material terms and conditions of the revolving line of credit. As of March 29,
2006, the Company had not borrowed any money from Midwest Bank pursuant to this line of credit.

The New Loans are secured by a first mortgage on the
Companys real estate and plant, as well as a first security interest on all accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, fixtures, and on all personal property and general intangibles. The Commercial Loan Agreement also required Husker Ag to pay
loan fees and related expenses of $39,656. The term loan with Union Bank is subject to a 3% prepayment penalty if it is refinanced with another lender. Otherwise, the Company may pay off either or both of the New Loans without penalty.

Loan for Investment in Val-E, Ethanol, LLC. On December 28, 2005, Husker Ag executed a new Commercial Loan Agreement and related promissory note with
Union Bank and Trust Company for a single advance term loan in the amount of $4,500,000 (the Val-E Loan). This Val-E Loan provided Husker Ag the funds necessary to purchase a 24.1% equity interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC. See General
Developments above under Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion on this investment. The proceeds from the Val-E Loan were wired to Husker Ag on or about January 4, 2006. This term note is amortized over a sixty
(60) month period commencing February 4, 2006, with a final maturity date of January 4, 2011. The interest rate is fixed at 6.85% per year for the term of the note. On January 31, 2006, Husker Ag used the proceeds from this
term loan for the balance of its purchase of its membership interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC; the Company had also paid $1,500,000 of its own cash for this investment.

This Val-E Loan is secured by Husker Ags real estate and plant as well as all accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, fixtures, and personal property and general intangibles pursuant to a pre-existing
Security Agreement and Deed of Trust dated February 22, 2005. The Val-E Loan is subject to a 3% prepayment penalty if it is refinanced with another lender. Otherwise, Husker Ag may pay off the loan without penalty. The Commercial Loan Agreement
for the Val-E Loan imposes a number of covenants, which currently are imposed by pre-existing loan agreements, and which are discussed below.

Loan
Covenants. Both the original Commercial Loan Agreement and the Commercial Loan Agreement for the Val-E Loan require lender approval prior to making distributions to Husker Ag members in excess of 35% of the Companys net income determined
on both a year-to-date and annual basis. Distributions may be made up to this 35% limitation without lender approval so long as Husker Ag complies with certain conditions including compliance with all financial loan covenants determined after giving
effect to such distribution. In addition, Husker Ag must obtain prior approval from both Union Bank and Midwest Bank for any capital improvements in excess of $1,050,000. The Commercial Loan Agreements also impose a number of other covenants,
stating that Husker Ag must maintain: (i) a minimum tangible net worth of $20,500,000; (ii) working capital of not less than $2,500,000; and (iii) a debt coverage ratio of 1.2:1 measured at the end of each year (ratio is defined as
net income plus depreciation plus interest on term debt divided by principal plus interest on term debt).



28



---

##### Table of Contents

The future annual maturities of all long-term debt not including the subscription payable of Husker Ag by fiscal year are
as follows (as of December 31, 2005):



|                                |  |   |          
|------------------------------- |  | - | ---------
|2006:                           |  | $ | 1,459,466
|2007:                           |  | $ | 1,460,764
|2008:                           |  | $ | 1,462,117
|2009:                           |  | $ | 1,463,527
|2010:                           |  | $ | 1,464,996
|2011 and thereafter: $1,764,329 |  |   |          

Management believes that its cash reserves and cash from operations are adequate to meet its operational expenses
and short and long-term debt repayment obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2005, the Company did not have any arrangements which meet the definition of an off-balance sheet arrangement as provided in the SEC regulations. However, other off-balance sheet arrangements are
disclosed in Notes 3 and 5 to the Companys audited financial statements.

Contractual Obligations

The Company has the following contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005:

Payments Due By Period



|                                                |  |       |           |                  |   |           |  |           |           |              |   |           |  |   |          
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | --------- | ---------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | --------- | ------------ | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|Contractual Obligations                         |  | Total |           | Less than 1 Year |   | 1-3 Years |  | 4-5 Years |           | Over 5 Years
|Long-Term debt, including current maturities(1) |  | $     | 9,075,199 |                  | $ | 1,459,466 |  | $         | 2,922,881 |              | $ | 2,928,523 |  | $ | 1,764,329
|Capital Lease Obligations                       |  |       |          |                  |   |          |  |           |          |              |   |          |  |   |         
|Operating Lease Obligations                     |  |       |          |                  |   |          |  |           |          |              |   |          |  |   |         
|Purchase Obligations                            |  |       |          |                  |   |          |  |           |          |              |   |          |  |   |         
|TOTALS                                          |  | $     | 9,075,199 |                  | $ | 1,459,466 |  | $         | 2,922,881 |              | $ | 2,928,523 |  | $ | 1,764,329

---

|(1) |  These amounts do not include the amount due under the Companys Subscription Agreement dated December 28, 2005 to purchase a 24.1% interest in Val-E
Ethanol, LLC. See discussion above under Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information regarding this Subscription Agreement.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Critical Accounting Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) recently issued
disclosure guidance for critical accounting policies. The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that require application of managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of
the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to customers. If necessary, the Company will provide an allowance
for doubtful accounts, which is based upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of raw materials, work-in-progress and
finished goods are determined using last cost and average cost under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of the Companys products is recognized when title passes based on delivery or shipping terms. The Company records revenue from federal and state incentive programs related to the production
of ethanol when the Company has produced the ethanol and completed all the requirements of the applicable incentive program.

Derivative Instruments

The Company enters into option and futures contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of corn
expected to be used in the manufacturing process. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the exposure to price risk related to corn purchases. The Company does not typically enter into derivative instruments for any reason other
than cash flow hedging purposes. The option and futures contracts are recorded on the Companys balance sheet at fair value. On the date that the contract is entered into, the Company designates the option or contract as a hedge of variable
cash flows of certain forecasted purchases of corn used in the manufacturing process (a cash flow hedge). The Company formally documents relationships between the option and futures contracts, which serve as the hedging instruments, and
the hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. When it is determined that an option or futures contract is not highly effective as a hedge or has ceased to be a highly effective
hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. Changes in the fair value of option and futures contracts that are highly effective and that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive loss.
Gains and losses that are realized will be recognized in the statement of income when the related corn purchased is recognized in cost of sales.

Currently, option and futures contracts on corn purchased by the Company do not meet the requirements for cash flow hedging treatment. As a result, changes in the market value of option and futures contracts are recorded on the income
statement in gain/loss on option and futures contracts.

ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk represents the potential loss arising
from adverse changes in market rates and prices. Certain market risks are inherent in the ethanol business with respect to commodity prices, from both an input (corn, natural gas, etc.) and output (ethanol and distillers grain) perspective. The
Company is also exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates.

Commodity Price Risk

Husker Ag uses derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk. It uses forward, option and futures contracts to hedge changes to
the commodity prices of ethanol, corn, natural gas and unleaded gas. The Company does not typically enter into derivative instruments for any reason other than cash flow hedging purposes; it does not enter into these derivative financial instruments
for trading or speculative purposes. (For additional information, see Options and Futures Contracts  Hedging above under Item 1 of this Form 10-K, as well as Note 7 to the Companys financial statements included below
under Item 8 of this Form 10-K).

Husker Ag produces ethanol and its co-product, distillers grain, from corn, and as such is sensitive to changes in
the price of corn. The price and availability of corn are subject to significant fluctuations depending upon a number of factors which affect commodity prices in general, including crop conditions, weather, governmental programs and foreign
purchases. Because the market price of ethanol is not related to grain prices, ethanol producers are generally not able to compensate for increases in the cost of corn through adjustments in prices charged for their ethanol.

Husker Ag also uses natural gas and unleaded gas in the production process, and as such is sensitive to changes in the price of both natural gas and unleaded gas. The
price of natural gas and unleaded gas is influenced by a variety of factors including political events, OPEC actions, weather factors as well as general market supply and demand.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

The Company attempts to reduce the market risk associated with fluctuations in the price of corn and natural gas by
employing a variety of risk management strategies. Strategies include the use of derivative financial instruments such as futures and options initiated on the Chicago Board of Trade and/or the New York Mercantile Exchange, as well as incorporating
the use of forward cash contracts or basis contracts. While the Company does not currently own any option or futures contracts for the purpose of hedging its unleaded gas needs, it does own such contracts for the purposes of hedging its gas-plus
ethanol contracts as discussed further below.

Although Husker Ag believes that its hedge positions accomplish an economic hedge against future purchases,
they do not qualify for hedge accounting, which would match the gain or loss on the Companys hedge positions to the specific commodity purchase or sale being hedged. Husker Ag is using fair value accounting for its hedge positions, which means
as the current market price of the Companys hedge positions changes, the gains and losses are immediately recognized on the Companys income statement as gain or loss on option and futures contracts. Based on long and short positions on
corn held by the Company at December 31, 2005, a 10% increase or decrease in the cash price of corn would impact the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments by approximately $100,000.

The Companys immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value
of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged. As of December 31, 2005, the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments for corn, natural gas and unleaded gas is a net asset in the amount
of $140,403. There are several variables that could affect the extent to which the Companys derivative instruments are impacted by price fluctuations in the cost of corn, natural gas or unleaded gas. However, commodity cash prices will likely
have the greatest impact on the derivatives instruments with delivery dates nearest the current cash price.

To manage corn price risk, the Companys
hedging strategy is generally designed to establish a price ceiling and floor for its corn purchases. The upper limit of loss on the Companys futures contracts is the difference between the contract price and the cash market price of corn at
the time of the execution of the contract. The upper limit of loss on the Companys exchange traded and over-the-counter option contracts is limited to the amount of the premium that the Company paid for the options.

The Company estimates that its expected corn usage is approximately nine million bushels per year for the production of approximately 25 million gallons of ethanol.
As of December 31, 2005, Husker Ag had cash, futures, and option contract price protection in place for approximately 46% of the Companys expected corn usage through September 2006; and as of December 31, 2005, Husker Ag also had
approximately 32% of its expected corn usage protected by cash purchase contracts through January 2007. As corn prices move in reaction to market trends, Husker Ags income statement may be affected depending on the impact such market movements
have on the value of the Companys derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop prospects and weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects but they are undertaken with the purpose of producing
long-term positive results for the Company.

To help manage the Companys natural gas price risk, as of December 31, 2005, Husker Ag has 100% of
its expected natural gas needs through March 31, 2006 purchased through the Cornerstone management procurement fund.

The Company is also exposed to
market risk from changes in ethanol prices. To manage this risk, the Company has entered into ethanol sale agreements with its customers to provide ethanol in the future at a fixed price. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had forward
contracts in place for the sale of approximately 21,579,000 gallons of ethanol with prices ranging from $1.20 to $2.10 per gallon to be delivered through December 2006. Husker Ag may continue to sell ethanol into 2007 to attempt to further reduce
the Companys risk for price decreases. See Risk Factors above for additional information regarding this price risk.

In addition, the
Company has purchased option and futures contracts on unleaded gas to hedge its outstanding gas-plus contracts for the sale of ethanol. The purpose of these contracts is to partially offset any losses recognized on such unleaded gas contracts with a
corresponding increase in the value of the Companys then outstanding gas-plus forward contracts for the sale of ethanol. See Options and Futures



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Contracts  Hedging above under Item 1 of this Form 10-K, as well as Loss on Option and Futures Contracts under Results of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 above under Item 7 of this Form 10-K for further discussion on the Companys gas-plus contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

The Companys interest rate risk exposure pertains primarily to its long-term debt and its
line of credit. As of December 31, 2005, Husker Ag has approximately $7.7 million outstanding in long-term debt with Union Bank and Trust Company. The interest rate on this debt is fixed at 6.2% through February 2010, at which time the interest
rate will be adjusted to the then 2-year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate plus 3.00%. The Companys revolving line of credit, which has not been used as of March 29, 2006, is with Midwest Bank National Association, and carries a variable
rate of interest equal to the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 0.75% adjusted monthly. Husker Ag manages its interest rate risk by monitoring the effects of market changes on interest rates and using fixed rate debt. In February 2005, the Company
refinanced its variable rate debt with the aforementioned loan with a fixed rate for five years. See Liquidity and Capital Resources above under Item 7 of Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Companys debt.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial Statements

Husker Ag, LLC

December 31,
2005 and 2004



|                                                        |  |   
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|Contents                                                |  |   
|                                                        | 
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  | 34
|                                                        | 
|Financial Statements                                    |  |   
|                                                        | 
|Balance Sheets                                          |  | 35
|                                                        | 
|Statements of Income                                    |  | 36
|                                                        | 
|Statements of Members Equity                           |  | 37
|                                                        | 
|Statements of Cash Flows                                |  | 38
|                                                        | 
|Notes to Financial Statements                           |  | 40



33



---

##### Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Members

Husker Ag, LLC

Plainview, Nebraska

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Husker Ag, LLC as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of income, members equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conduct our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Husker Ag, LLC as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Lincoln, Nebraska

February 1, 2006

See Notes to Financial Statements



34



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Balance Sheets

December 31, 2005 and 2004



|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                                                                                                        |  | 2005 |            | 2004
|Assets                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Current Assets                                                                                          |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Cash                                                                                                    |  | $    | 124,781    |      | $ | 2,406,010 
|Restricted cash                                                                                         |  |      | 370,320    |      |   | 393,060   
|Repurchase agreement                                                                                    |  |      | 4,632,681  |      |   | 8,894,027 
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total cash and cash equivalents                                                                         |  |      | 5,127,782  |      |   | 11,693,097
|                                                                                                        |  |     
|Certificates of deposit                                                                                 |  |      | 1,525,589  |      |   |          
|Accounts receivable                                                                                     |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Trade                                                                                                   |  |      | 754,530    |      |   | 398,651   
|Incentives                                                                                              |  |      |           |      |   | 74,651    
|Inventories                                                                                             |  |      | 753,403    |      |   | 1,671,610 
|Margin account                                                                                          |  |      | 201,427    |      |   | 249,755   
|Option and futures contracts                                                                            |  |      | 6,081      |      |   | 77,813    
|Prepaid expenses                                                                                        |  |      | 276,556    |      |   | 299,138   
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total current assets                                                                                    |  |      | 8,645,368  |      |   | 14,464,715
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Property and Equipment,at cost                                                                          |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Land                                                                                                    |  |      | 84,318     |      |   | 84,318    
|Plant buildings and equipment                                                                           |  |      | 30,825,884 |      |   | 30,488,254
|Other equipment                                                                                         |  |      | 473,484    |      |   | 418,779   
|Office building                                                                                         |  |      | 215,673    |      |   | 215,673   
|Vehicles                                                                                                |  |      | 35,523     |      |   | 22,200    
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|                                                                                                        |  |      | 31,634,882 |      |   | 31,229,224
|Less accumulated depreciation                                                                           |  |      | 6,144,431  |      |   | 3,963,275 
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|                                                                                                        |  |      | 25,490,451 |      |   | 27,265,949
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Investment in Affiliate                                                                                 |  |      | 5,974,638  |      |   |          
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Other Assets                                                                                            |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Debt origination costs, net of accumulated amortization; December 31, 2005 - $4,858 and 2004 - $128,838 |  |      | 34,798     |      |   | 576,742   
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|                                                                                                        |  | $    | 40,145,255 |      | $ | 42,307,406
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Liabilities and Members Equity                                                                         |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Current Liabilities                                                                                     |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Accounts payable                                                                                        |  | $    | 1,374,429  |      | $ | 1,910,726 
|Current maturities of long-term debt                                                                    |  |      | 1,459,466  |      |   | 2,141,171 
|Subscription payable                                                                                    |  |      | 786,312    |      |   |          
|Option and futures contracts                                                                            |  |      | 67,105     |      |   | 259,025   
|Accrued property taxes                                                                                  |  |      | 313,514    |      |   | 368,294   
|Accrued expenses                                                                                        |  |      | 196,005    |      |   | 172,271   
|Deferred revenue                                                                                        |  |      |           |      |   | 538,477   
|Distributions payable                                                                                   |  |      |           |      |   | 1,531,800 
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total current liabilities                                                                               |  |      | 4,196,831  |      |   | 6,921,764 
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Long-term Debt                                                                                          |  |      | 7,615,733  |      |   | 13,965,976
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Subscription Payable                                                                                    |  |      | 3,713,688  |      |   |          
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Members Equity 15,318 Units                                                                           |  |      | 24,619,003 |      |   | 21,419,666
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           
|                                                                                                        |  | $    | 40,145,255 |      | $ | 42,307,406
|                                                                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |           

See Notes to Financial Statements



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                               |  | 2005 |            |   | 2004 |   |            | 2003 | 
|Net Sales                                      |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Ethanol sales                                  |  | $    | 38,319,167 |   |      | $ | 35,446,018 |      |  | $ | 22,160,427 |  
|Distillers grain sales                         |  |      | 6,100,110  |   |      |   | 7,325,651  |      |  |   | 4,807,870  |  
|Energy production credits                      |  |      | 2,805,191  |   |      |   | 5,013,391  |      |  |   | 7,368,737  |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|                                               |  |      | 47,224,468 |   |      |   | 47,785,060 |      |  |   | 34,337,034 |  
|                                               |  |      |           
|Cost of Sales                                  |  |      | 29,775,868 |   |      |   | 29,033,578 |      |  |   | 19,482,627 |  
|Cost of Sales-Related Parties                  |  |      | 2,916,522  |   |      |   | 5,157,214  |      |  |   | 5,232,691  |  
|Gain (Loss) on Option and Futures Contracts    |  |      | (1,807,964 | ) |      |   | (1,612,429 | )    |  |   | 159,238    |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Gross Profit                                   |  |      | 12,724,114 |   |      |   | 11,981,839 |      |  |   | 9,780,954  |  
|Selling, General and Administrative Expenses   |  |      | 2,266,188  |   |      |   | 1,571,628  |      |  |   | 1,098,188  |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Income from Operations                         |  |      | 10,457,926 |   |      |   | 10,410,211 |      |  |   | 8,682,766  |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Other Income (Expense)                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Other income                                   |  |      | 118,205    |   |      |   | 240,520    |      |  |   | 16,354     |  
|Interest expense                               |  |      | (668,533   | ) |      |   | (1,010,846 | )    |  |   | (724,001   | )
|Interest income                                |  |      | 210,201    |   |      |   | 128,462    |      |  |   | 21,024     |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|                                               |  |      | (340,127   | ) |      |   | (641,864   | )    |  |   | (686,623   | )
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Income before Equity in Net Loss of Affiliate  |  |      | 10,117,799 |   |      |   | 9,768,347  |      |  |   | 7,996,143  |  
|Equity in Net Loss of Affiliate                |  |      | (25,362    | ) |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net Income                                     |  | $    | 10,092,437 |   |      | $ | 9,768,347  |      |  | $ | 7,996,143  |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Membership Unit |  | $    | 658.86     |   |      | $ | 637.70     |      |  | $ | 522.01     |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Weighted Average Units Outstanding             |  |      | 15,318     |   |      |   | 15,318     |      |  |   | 15,318     |  
|                                               |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  

See Notes to Financial Statements



36



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Statements of Members Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



|                                                           |  |                  |  |                                |            |  |                 |            |   |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ---------- |  | --------------- | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                           |  | Membership Units |  | Accumulated Earnings (Deficit) |            |  | Members Equity |           
|                                                           |  | Number           |  | Amount                         |            | 
|Balance, January 1, 2003                                   |  | 15,318           |  | $                              | 14,531,162 |  | $               | (1,683,917 | ) |  | $ | 12,847,245 |  
|Distributions paid for state taxes of out-of-state members |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | (1,269     | ) |  |   | (1,269     | )
|Distributions declared, $150 per membership unit           |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | (2,297,700 | ) |  |   | (2,297,700 | )
|Net income                                                 |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | 7,996,143  |   |  |   | 7,996,143  |  
|                                                           |  |                  |  |                                |            |  |                 |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                                 |  | 15,318           |  |                                | 14,531,162 |  |                 | 4,013,257  |   |  |   | 18,544,419 |  
|Distributions declared, $450 per membership unit           |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | (6,893,100 | ) |  |   | (6,893,100 | )
|Net income                                                 |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | 9,768,347  |   |  |   | 9,768,347  |  
|                                                           |  |                  |  |                                |            |  |                 |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2004                                 |  | 15,318           |  |                                | 14,531,162 |  |                 | 6,888,504  |   |  |   | 21,419,666 |  
|Distributions declared, $450 per membership unit           |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | (6,893,100 | ) |  |   | (6,893,100 | )
|Net income                                                 |  |                 |  |                                |           |  |                 | 10,092,437 |   |  |   | 10,092,437 |  
|                                                           |  |                  |  |                                |            |  |                 |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2005                                 |  | 15,318           |  | $                              | 14,531,162 |  | $               | 10,087,841 |   |  | $ | 24,619,003 |  
|                                                           |  |                  |  |                                |            |  |                 |            |   |  |   |            |  

See Notes to Financial Statements



37



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                       |  | 2005 |             |   | 2004 |   |             | 2003 | 
|Operating Activities                                   |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net income                                             |  | $    | 10,092,437  |   |      | $ | 9,768,347   |      |  | $ | 7,996,143  |  
|Items not requiring (providing) cash                   |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Depreciation and amortization expense                  |  |      | 2,245,772   |   |      |   | 2,270,429   |      |  |   | 1,818,561  |  
|Write-off of debt origination costs                    |  |      | 562,442     |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Gain on sale of property and equipment                 |  |      | (819        | ) |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Equity in net loss of affiliate                        |  |      | 25,362      |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Unrealized loss (gain) on option and futures contracts |  |      | (120,188    | ) |      |   | 393,175     |      |  |   | (896,988   | )
|Changes in                                             |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Accounts receivable                                    |  |      | (281,228    | ) |      |   | 1,647,417   |      |  |   | (2,120,719 | )
|Inventories                                            |  |      | 918,207     |   |      |   | (779,402    | )    |  |   | (892,208   | )
|Margin account                                         |  |      | 48,328      |   |      |   | 185,447     |      |  |   | (113,252   | )
|Prepaid expenses                                       |  |      | 22,582      |   |      |   | (80,472     | )    |  |   | (196,821   | )
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                  |  |      | (567,343    | ) |      |   | 1,221,629   |      |  |   | 1,092,173  |  
|Deferred revenue                                       |  |      | (538,477    | ) |      |   | 538,477     |      |  |   |           |  
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities              |  |      | 12,407,075  |   |      |   | 15,165,047  |      |  |   | 6,686,889  |  
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Investing Activities                                   |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Purchase of certificates of deposit                    |  |      | (1,525,589  | ) |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Proceeds from sale of property and equipment           |  |      | 9,000       |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Proceeds from sales tax refund on equipment            |  |      | 345,218     |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Payment for purchase of investment in affiliate        |  |      | (1,500,000  | ) |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Purchases of property and equipment                    |  |      | (804,515    | ) |      |   | (651,001    | )    |  |   | (7,115,167 | )
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                  |  |      | (3,475,886  | ) |      |   | (651,001    | )    |  |   | (7,115,167 | )
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Financing Activities                                   |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of long-term debt                             |  |      | 10,000,000  |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           |  
|Advances on construction loan                          |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   | 9,635,745  |  
|Payments on construction loan                          |  |      |            |   |      |   | (152,643    | )    |  |   | (494,717   | )
|Payments on long-term debt                             |  |      | (17,031,948 | ) |      |   | (3,755,413  | )    |  |   | (11,200    | )
|Payment of debt origination costs                      |  |      | (39,656     | ) |      |   | (260,494    | )    |  |   |           |  
|Distributions paid                                     |  |      | (8,424,900  | ) |      |   | (7,659,000  | )    |  |   | (1,269     | )
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities    |  |      | (15,496,504 | ) |      |   | (11,827,550 | )    |  |   | 9,128,559  |  
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents       |  |      | (6,565,315  | ) |      |   | 2,686,496   |      |  |   | 8,700,281  |  
|                                                       |  |      |            
|Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year           |  |      | 11,693,097  |   |      |   | 9,006,601   |      |  |   | 306,320    |  
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year                 |  | $    | 5,127,782   |   |      | $ | 11,693,097  |      |  | $ | 9,006,601  |  
|                                                       |  |      |             |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  

See Notes to Financial Statements



38



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Statements of Cash Flows - Continued

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



|                                                                                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                            |  | 2005 |           | 2004 |   |           | 2003 | 
|Supplemental Cash Flows Information                                                         |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |            |  
|Net decrease in accounts payable incurred for site development and construction in progress |  | $    |          |      | $ | (100,000  | )    |  | $ | (1,428,120 | )
|Long-term debt incurred for plant buildings and equipment                                   |  | $    |          |      | $ |          |      |  | $ | 693,260    |  
|Interest paid (net of amount capitalized)                                                   |  | $    | 683,613   |      | $ | 982,142   |      |  | $ | 724,001    |  
|Distributions payable                                                                       |  | $    |          |      | $ | 1,531,800 |      |  | $ | 2,297,700  |  
|Subscription payable for investment in affiliate                                            |  | $    | 4,500,000 |      | $ |          |      |  | $ |           |  
|Construction loan payable refinanced to long-term debt                                      |  | $    |          |      | $ |          |      |  | $ | 19,180,500 |  

See Notes to Financial Statements



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Husker
Ag, LLC (the Company), a Nebraska Limited Liability Company, was formed August 29, 2000 and is located in Plainview, Nebraska. Prior to formation of the LLC, the Company operated as a partnership. The Company was organized to obtain equity
investors and debt financing to construct, own and operate an ethanol plant with an annual production capacity of approximately 24 million gallons. Construction began in 2001 and operations commenced in March 2003. The Companys products
include fuel grade ethanol sold in limited markets throughout the United States and distillers grain sold in surrounding counties in Nebraska. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers, with credit extended to one customer of
approximately 50% of trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. Substantially all ethanol sales are made to one broker.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash
Equivalents

The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, cash equivalents consisted primarily of a retail repurchase agreement and mutual fund.

The Company
maintains its cash accounts primarily at two financial institutions. At times throughout the periods and at December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Companys cash and certificate of deposit balances at individual institutions exceeded federally
insured limits. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash. The Company is required by a bank to maintain certain cash reserves to secure letter of credit obligations.

The Company maintains cash in a retail repurchase agreement at a financial institution and the financial institution pledges securities as collateral to
secure the balance held under the agreement.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to customers. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company believes all receivables are fully
collectible. If necessary, the Company will provide an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is based upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. Accounts receivable are ordinarily
due in 3 business days for ethanol and 15 days after the issuance of the invoice for distillers grain. Accounts that are unpaid after 30 days bear interest at 18%. Accounts past due more than 120 days are considered delinquent. Interest ceases to
accrue on delinquent accounts and does not resume until the account is no longer classified as delinquent. Delinquent receivables are written off based on individual credit evaluation and specific circumstances of the customer.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued

Inventories

Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost on raw materials is determined using last cost and average cost under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Cost on finished goods is determined using average cost under the FIFO method. Inventories were
comprised of the following at December 31:



|                                     |  |      |         |      |   |          
|------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                     |  | 2005 |         | 2004
|Raw materials, enzymes and additives |  | $    | 375,082 |      | $ | 412,634  
|Work-in-progress                     |  |      | 155,913 |      |   | 167,307  
|Finished goods                       |  |      | 222,408 |      |   | 1,091,669
|                                     |  |      |         |      |   |          
|                                     |  | $    | 753,403 |      | $ | 1,671,610
|                                     |  |      |         |      |   |          

Debt Origination Costs

On January 20, 2004 the Company refinanced its construction loan requiring the payment of loan origination costs and other fees, including a UDSA
guarantee fee, totaling $260,494. On February 23, 2005 the Company refinanced its long-term debt requiring loan origination costs totaling $39,656 to be capitalized and unamortized costs totaling $562,442 related to the repaid debt to be
written off as of that date. The remaining debt origination costs have been deferred and are amortized over approximately seven years (the life of the loan) using the straight-line method. Debt origination costs, net of accumulated amortization,
amounted to $34,798 and $576,742 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $19,157, $95,456, and $33,382 respectively.

Income Taxes

The
Companys members have elected to have the Companys income taxed as a partnership under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and a similar section of the Nebraska income tax law. Therefore, taxable income or loss is reported to the
individual members for inclusion in their respective tax returns and no provision for federal and state income taxes is included in these statements.

Investment in Affiliate

The investment in a 24.1% owned affiliate is stated at cost less
equity in the affiliates net loss since acquisition (see Note 4).

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of the Companys products is recognized when products are shipped to customers and title passes. The Company records revenue
from federal and state incentive programs related to the production of ethanol when the Company has produced the ethanol and completed all the requirements of the applicable incentive program.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are depreciated over the estimated useful life of each asset which ranges from 3 to 30 years. Annual depreciation is primarily computed using the straight-line method.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 1: Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued

The Company capitalized interest costs as a component of construction in progress, based on the weighted-average rates paid for short-term borrowing.
Total interest incurred each year was:



|                                  |  |      |         |      |   |           |  |   |        
|--------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | -------
|                                  |  | 2005 |         | 2004 |   | 2003     
|Interest costs capitalized        |  | $    |        |      | $ |          |  | $ | 117,551
|Interest costs charged to expense |  |      | 668,533 |      |   | 1,010,846 |  |   | 724,001
|                                  |  |      |         |      |   |           |  |   |        
|Total interest incurred           |  | $    | 668,533 |      | $ | 1,010,846 |  | $ | 841,552
|                                  |  |      |         |      |   |           |  |   |        

Grant Income

In September 2004, the Company received a $226,850 Value-Added Agricultural Product Market Development grant from the United States Department of
Agriculture to assist the Company in paying for employee salaries and corn purchases. The Company recognized this amount as income upon meeting the conditions of the grant. The amount is included in other income in 2004 in the accompanying financial
statements.

Earnings Per Membership Unit

For purposes of calculating basic earnings per membership unit, units subscribed and issued by the Company are considered outstanding on the effective date of issue. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per
membership unit, units subscribed for but not issued by the Company are also included in the computation of outstanding membership units.

Note 2:
Members Equity

In November 2004, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash distribution of $100 per membership unit
to all members of record as of November 30, 2004 payable in January, 2005. A distribution payable in the amount of $1,531,800 was recorded by the Company as of December 31, 2004 by a charge to members equity.

There are significant transfer restrictions on transferability of membership units. The Companys Operating Agreement, as well as relevant portions
of the Nebraska Limited Liability Company Act and regulations of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) significantly restrict the transfer of the membership units. Unit holders cannot assign or transfer a membership unit without approval from the
Companys Board of Directors and the transfer or assignment must comply with applicable Nebraska laws and IRS regulations. Members are not personally liable for any debts or losses of the Company beyond their respective capital contribution.

The Board of Directors will not approve transfers if the Board determines the transfer would cause the Company to be treated as a
publicly traded partnership. Any transfers of membership units in violation of the publicly traded partnership rules or without the prior consent of the Board of Directors will be null and void.

Note 3: Commitments and Related Parties

On
August 29, 2002, the Company entered into a natural gas distribution agreement under which the distributor has agreed to transport a minimum of 35 million therms of natural gas at a fixed price over a five-year initial term expiring in
February 2008. The agreement is renewable at the end of the initial term for an additional five-year period.

On June 1, 2005, the Company
renewed an ethanol marketing agreement with Eco-Energy, Inc. to market ethanol for an agreed-upon fee, which includes the cost of the rail shipment. Eco-



42



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 3: Commitments and Related Parties - Continued

Energy, Inc. also collects the sales amount from the ultimate customers and remits the net sales price to the Company within three business days after the
sale. The marketing agreement expires September 30, 2006.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had entered into agreements to
purchase 3,104,024 bushels of corn at an average price of $2.02 per bushel to be delivered between January 2006 and July 2007. Forty-five contracts totaling 610,376 bushels are with related parties.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had contracts for the sale of approximately 19,897,000 gallons of ethanol with prices ranging from $1.20 to $2.10
per gallon and 1,682,000 gallons at variable prices to be delivered in 2006.

The Company has committed to purchase various equipment
related to a beer well expansion. The cost of the expansion is estimated to range from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000.

Note 4: Investment in Affiliate

On December 28, 2005, the Company purchased a 24.1% ownership interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC, a development stage company for
$6,000,000. The investment is recorded at an amount equal to the Companys equity in Val-E Ethanol, LLCs net assets as of the acquisition date less the Companys equity in its affiliates net losses from the acquisition date.
Financial position and results of operations of the affiliate are summarized below:



|                                    |  |      |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------
|                                    |  | 2005
|Current assets                      |  | $    | 4,932,310
|Property and other long-term assets |  |      | 1,007,264
|                                    |  |      |          
|Total assets                        |  |      | 5,939,575
|Current liabilities                 |  |      | 258,250  
|                                    |  |      |          
|Net assets                          |  | $    | 5,681,325
|                                    |  |      |          
|Net sales                           |  | $    |         
|                                    |  |      |          
|Net loss                            |  | $    | 105,238  
|                                    |  |      |          

Subscriptions receivable have not been recorded by Val-E Ethanol, LLC for membership units sold but
for which no payments have yet been received. Upon receipt of the subscriptions, net assets will increase by approximately $19,113,000.

Note 5:
Long-term Debt

On January 20, 2004 the Company converted its construction loan into permanent financing. As part of the
conversion, the Company made a principal payment in the amount of $152,643 and entered into three term loans, two of which were outstanding at December 31, 2004. Terms of the notes are described below and the notes were paid in full in February
2005.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 5: Long-term Debt - Continued

On February 23, 2005, the Company refinanced its term loans with Union Bank and Trust Company. As a part of the refinancing, the Company made an
additional principal payment in the amount of $5,793,445, paid a pre-payment penalty of $309,616 and entered into a $10,000,000 term loan, $8,809,500 of which remains outstanding at December 31, 2005. The term loan and a line of credit are
subject to certain restrictive covenants, which among other things require prior lender approval for distributions above 35% of current year net income and the maintenance of minimum levels of tangible net worth, working capital and debt coverage
and restricts the annual amount of capital improvements. At December 31, 2005 the Company received a waiver of noncompliance with the distribution limitation covenant.

On December 28, 2005, a subscription agreement in the amount of $6,000,000 for the purchase of a 24.1% interest in Val-E Ethanol, LLC was accepted
(see Note 4). As a result, a 25% installment payment of $1,500,000 was made on December 29, 2005. In order to fund the remaining amount due under the subscription agreement, the Company entered into a note payable with Union Bank and Trust
Company for $4,500,000 of long-term debt. The note was signed December 28, 2005; however, no advance was made on the note until January 4, 2006.

The note bears interest at 6.85% and is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest of $89,497. The note is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company and a first deed of trust on real
property. The subscription payable on the balance sheet reflects the current and long-term portions of the note.

Long-term debt consists
of the following as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      |           |      |   |          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 2005 |           | 2004
|Note payable to Stearns Bank due in monthly installments of principal and interest of $125,633. The note accrued interest at a variable rate
of Wall Street Journal Prime plus 1.25% (6.0% at December 31, 2004), adjusted quarterly. The note was collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company, a first deed of trust on real property and a 70% USDA guarantee. The note was paid
in full in February 2005.                                          |  | $    |          |      | $ | 7,905,914
|Note payable to Stearns Bank due in monthly installments of principal and interest of $125,633. The note accrued interest at a variable rate
of Wall Street Journal Prime plus 1.25% (6.0% at December 31, 2004), adjusted quarterly. The note was collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company and a first deed of trust on real property. The note was paid in full in February
2005.                                                                |  |      |          |      |   | 7,905,914
|Note payable to Union Bank and Trust Company due in monthly principal installments of $119,050 plus accrued interest. The note bears interest
at a fixed rate of 6.2% for five years. On February 22, 2010 the interest will be adjusted to a fixed rate of 3% above the Treasury 2 year Constant Maturity Rate. The note matures on February 22, 2012 and is collateralized by substantially
all assets of the Company and a first deed of trust on real property. |  |      | 8,809,500 |      |   |         



44



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 5: Long-term Debt - Continued



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | --------- |  | - | ----------
|Note payable to Northeast Nebraska Public Power District due in monthly installments of $3,438 through June 2013. The note bears interest at a
fixed rate of 4.127%. The note is collateralized by a letter of credit in the amount of $295,320 expiring March 7, 2006. The letter of credit requires the Company to maintain cash at the bank in an amount equal to the letter of
credit. |  |   | 265,699   |  |   | 295,319   
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |           
|Total long-term debt                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |   | 9,075,199 |  |   | 16,107,147
|Less current maturities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |   | 1,459,466 |  |   | 2,141,171 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |           
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  | $ | 7,615,733 |  | $ | 13,965,976
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |   |           |  |   |           

The Company has a line of credit, with maximum borrowings of $5,000,000, expiring
February 22, 2006. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no borrowings against the line. The line is collateralized by a security agreement dated February 22, 2005 and a first deed of trust on real property. The line bears
interest at 8.25% through April 1, 2005 and at a variable interest rate of Wall Street Journal Prime plus 0.75% thereafter. Interest is payable monthly.

The Company also has a letter of credit with Midwest Bank N.A. in the amount of $75,000, expiring March 7, 2006, to be used to serve the Companys natural gas obligations. The letter of credit requires the
Company to maintain cash at the bank in an amount equal to the letter of credit.

Future annual maturities of long-term debt and the
subscription payable as of December 31, 2005 are as follows:



|                         |  |               |           |                     |   |          
|------------------------ |  | ------------- | --------- | ------------------- | - | ---------
|Year Ending December 31, |  | Long-TermDebt |           | SubscriptionPayable
|2006                     |  | $             | 1,459,466 |                     | $ | 786,312  
|2007                     |  |               | 1,460,764 |                     |   | 842,695  
|2008                     |  |               | 1,462,117 |                     |   | 902,556  
|2009                     |  |               | 1,463,527 |                     |   | 967,838  
|2010                     |  |               | 1,464,996 |                     |   | 1,000,599
|Thereafter               |  |               | 1,764,329 |                     |   |         
|                         |  |               |           |                     |   |          
|                         |  | $             | 9,075,199 |                     | $ | 4,500,000
|                         |  |               |           |                     |   |          

Note 6: Retirement Plan

On January 12, 2004, the Company implemented a retirement plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches employee contributions up to a maximum of 3% of employee compensation. Company
contributions to the plan were $45,682 and $37,322 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively.

Note 7: Derivative Instruments

The Company enters into option and futures contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of corn and natural gas
expected to be used in the manufacturing process and ethanol expected to be sold. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the



45



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 7: Derivative Instruments - Continued

exposure to price risk related to corn and natural gas purchases and ethanol sales. The Company does not typically enter into derivative instruments for
any reason other than cash flow hedging purposes.

The option and futures contracts presented on the December 31, 2005 and 2004 balance
sheets are recorded at fair value. On the date that the contract is entered into, the Company designates the option or contract as a hedge of variable cash flows of certain forecasted purchases of corn and natural gas used in and forecasted sales of
ethanol produced by the manufacturing process (a cash flow hedge).

In order for these open contracts to qualify for cash flow
hedging treatment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company must formally document relationships between the option and futures
contracts, which serve as the hedging instruments, and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. When it is determined that an option or futures contract is not highly
effective as a hedge or has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company must discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. Changes in the fair value of option and futures contracts that are highly effective and that are designated and qualify
as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income or loss.

Gains and losses that are realized will be recognized in the
statement of income when the related corn and natural gas purchased is recognized in cost of sales or when the related sale of ethanol is recognized in sales.

Currently, option and futures contracts on corn and natural gas purchased and ethanol sold by the Company do not meet the requirements for cash flow hedging treatment. As a result, changes in market value of option
and futures contracts are recorded on the statements of income in gain/loss on option and futures contracts.

Note 8: Related Party Transactions

The Company has transactions in the normal course of business with various members. Significant related party transactions affecting
the financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31 are approximately as follows:



|                       |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|---------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                       |  | 2005 |           | 2004 |   |          
|Balance Sheets         |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Accounts receivable    |  | $    | 52,000    |      | $ | 34,000    |  |   |          
|Accounts payable       |  |      | 174,000   |      |   | 345,000   |  |   |          
|                       |  |      |          
|                       |  | 2005 |           | 2004 |   | 2003     
|Statements of Income   |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Distillers grain sales |  | $    | 790,000   |      | $ | 1,028,000 |  | $ | 1,307,000
|Corn purchases         |  |      | 2,917,000 |      |   | 5,157,000 |  |   | 5,233,000

Note 9: Disclosure Regarding Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair
value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Companys various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are
based on estimates using discounted expected cash flows or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value
estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair



46



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 9: Disclosure Regarding Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Continued

value amounts may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company. The Companys financial instruments are comprised of cash and
cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, commodity margin accounts, accounts receivable, accounts payable, option and futures contracts and long-term debt. At December 31, 2005 the carrying value of long-term debt exceeds its fair value by
approximately $185,000. The fair value of the remaining 2005 financial instruments and all 2004 financial instruments approximate the amounts recorded in the Companys financial statements due primarily to their short-term nature or variable
interest rate terms.

Note 10: Energy Production Incentive Credits and Significant Estimates

The Company is currently participating in a state energy production credit program. Under this program, the Company earns a credit of $0.18 per gallon of
ethanol produced, not to exceed 15,625,000 gallons annually and no more than 125,000,000 gallons over a consecutive 96-month period. The program expires June 30, 2012. Credits earned annually under this program for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $2,812,500.

The Company is also participating in a federal production credit program. Credits
earned under this program are based on the increased utilization of corn in the production of ethanol. As of December 31, 2004, accounts receivable related to this program were approximately $75,000. Credits earned were approximately $2,201,000
and $4,556,000 for the years ended December 31 2004 and 2003, respectively. Since the Company began operations in March 2003 and credits earned under this program are based on the increased utilization of corn, the majority of the revenue
generated under this program was realized within the first 12 months of operations. As a result, substantially no credits were earned during the year ended December 31, 2005.

Credits earned under the aforementioned state and federal energy production programs are included in net sales in the accompanying statements of income.

Note 11: Repurchase Agreement

In
order to perfect the security interest of the Company in securities that act as collateral under the repurchase agreement, Midwest Bank, N.A. (the Bank) has transferred such securities to a third party custodian. The custodian is the Companys
agent for the purposes of possessing and perfecting the Companys security interest in said securities at December 31, 2005. To the extent that the market value of the securities used as collateral falls below the outstanding amount of
repurchase obligation, the Company may become an unsecured creditor of the Bank. The market value of securities pledged as collateral exceeds the carrying amount of the repurchase agreement and the agreement has a weighted average maturity of one
day as of December 31, 2005.

Note 12: Contingencies

Husker Ag, LLC is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern emissions of air pollutants; discharges or water pollutants; and generation, handling, storage and disposal
of hazardous substances. The Company is also subject to potential liabilities arising under state laws that require responsible parties to remediate releases of hazardous or solid waste constituents into the environment associated with past or
present activities. The Company continues to operate under an amended construction air permit. Emission test results are currently under review by Nebraska DEQ for consideration of an operating air permit.

Note 13: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. The Statement generally provides that the cost of share-



47



---

##### Table of Contents

Husker Ag, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



Note 13: Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Continued

based payments be recognized over the service period based on the fair value of the option or other instruments at the date of grant. The grant date fair
value should be estimated using an option-pricing model adjusted for the unique characteristics of the options or other instruments granted. The Company does not have any outstanding options at December 31, 2005 or 2004. With respect to any
future grants, the Company may elect to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model or may elect to determine the grant date fair value using an alternative method. This Statement will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2006.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.
This Statement clarifies that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs should be classified as a current-period charge. The Statement also requires the allocation of fixed production overhead to
inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.
Opinion No. 29 generally provides that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged subject to certain exceptions to the general rule. The Statement amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate
the exception for exchanges involving similar productive assets with a general exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. This Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges in periods beginning after June 15, 2005.

The implementation of these pronouncements is not expected to have a significant effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

Supplementary Financial Information

Quarterly Information (unaudited)

The following is an unaudited summary of the Companys quarterly operating results for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:



|                                               |  |           |            |         |   |            |         |  |         |            |  |   |           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------- | ---------- | ------- | - | ---------- | ------- |  | ------- | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                                               |  | Quarterly
|                                               |  | 1st Qtr   |            | 2nd Qtr |   |            | 3rd Qtr |  | 4th Qtr
|Year ended December 31, 2005                   |  |           |            |         |   |            |         |  |         |            |  |   |           
|Net Sales                                      |  | $         | 10,817,630 |         | $ | 12,678,945 |         |  | $       | 13,261,297 |  | $ | 10,466,596
|Gross Profit                                   |  |           | 2,502,875  |         |   | 4,026,121  |         |  |         | 3,308,100  |  |   | 2,887,018 
|Net Income                                     |  |           | 1,203,072  |         |   | 3,504,167  |         |  |         | 2,945,136  |  |   | 2,440,062 
|Net income per unit  basic and diluted        |  | $         | 78.54      |         | $ | 228.76     |         |  | $       | 192.27     |  | $ | 159.29    
|                                               | 
|                                               |  | Quarterly
|                                               |  | 1st Qtr   |            | 2nd Qtr |   |            | 3rd Qtr |  | 4th Qtr
|Year ended December 31, 2004                   |  |           |            |         |   |            |         |  |         |            |  |   |           
|Net Sales                                      |  | $         | 13,313,299 |         | $ | 11,313,108 |         |  | $       | 12,298,481 |  | $ | 10,860,172
|Gross Profit                                   |  |           | 7,220,862  |         |   | 210,495    |         |  |         | 1,789,261  |  |   | 2,761,221 
|Net Income (loss)                              |  |           | 6,567,301  |         |   | (509,900   | )       |  |         | 1,429,132  |  |   | 2,281,814 
|Net income (loss) per unit  basic and diluted |  | $         | 428.73     |         | $ | (33.29     | )       |  | $       | 93.30      |  | $ | 148.96    

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, except for the material weaknesses disclosed in the following
paragraph, our disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and
communicated to Company management (including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Security and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms.

The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Company has material
weaknesses in its controls over the financial reporting processes including the accurate reporting and disclosure of amounts and other disclosure items in our financial statements. In addition, these officers have concluded that the Company has a
material weakness in both its lack of segregation of duties for its accounting functions and in its failure to establish adequate monitoring controls to insure that information generated for financial reporting purposes is complete and accurate. In
light of the foregoing, management is in the process of developing additional procedures to help address these issues. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and objectives.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls: During the Companys fourth fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2005, there have not been any significant changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

During the fourth quarter of 2005, no information was required to be disclosed in a report on
Form 8-K, but not reported.

PART III



|ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|-------- | --------------------------------------------------

The executive
officers and directors of Husker Ag and their respective ages and positions as of the date of this report are as follows:



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                  |  |                            |  |                     
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Name                |  | Age |  | Position                                                         |  | Year First Became Director |  | Director TermExpires
|Fredrick J. Knievel |  | 64  |  | Class III Director, Chairman of the Board and President          |  | 2000                       |  | 2007                
|Mike Kinney         |  | 48  |  | Class II Director, Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President |  | 2000                       |  | 2006                
|Leonard Wostrel     |  | 67  |  | Class III Director, Secretary                                    |  | 2004                       |  | 2007                
|Robert E. Brummels  |  | 55  |  | Class I Director, Treasurer                                      |  | 2004                       |  | 2008                
|Stanley Gyberg      |  | 62  |  | Class II Director                                                |  | 2003                       |  | 2006                
|J. Alex Thramer     |  | 77  |  | Class II Director                                                |  | 2000                       |  | 2006                
|David Kolsrud1      |  | 57  |  | Class II Director                                                |  | 2002                       |  | 2006                
|Gary Kuester        |  | 60  |  | Class III Director                                               |  | 2000                       |  | 2007                
|David Stearns       |  | 58  |  | Class III Director                                               |  | 2004                       |  | 2007                
|Ronald A. Fick      |  | 51  |  | Class I Director                                                 |  | 2002                       |  | 2008                
|Kent A. Friedrich   |  | 43  |  | Class I Director                                                 |  | 2005                       |  | 2008                
|James Hall          |  | 61  |  | Class I Director                                                 |  | 2001                       |  | 2008                
|O. Wayne Mitchell   |  | 47  |  | Class I Director                                                 |  | 2001                       |  | 2008                
|Gerald Winter1      |  | 68  |  | Class II Nominee                                                 |  |                           |  |                    



|1- | David A. Kolsrud, a current Class II director, elected not to seek re-election for his Class II director seat. At its meeting held April 4, 2006, the Companys Nominating
Committee nominated Mr. Winter for election at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Members as a Class II director.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fredrick J.
Knievel is the President and co-owner of Knievel Farms, Inc. which is a farming operation located near Clearwater, Nebraska engaged in the production of corn, soybeans, hay and cattle. Mr. Knievel has been associated with Knievel Farms, Inc.
since 1978. Mr. Knievel has served as Chairman of the Board and President of Husker Ag since June 2004.

Mike Kinney has been
employed by Kinney, Inc., which is a family farm corporation located near Elgin, Nebraska since 1974. He is currently serving as Vice President of Kinney, Inc. Mr. Kinney is also a partner in Kinney Bros., a farming operation. Mr. Kinney has served
as Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President of Husker Ag since June 2004.

Leonard Wostrelis a resident of Creighton,
Nebraska, where he currently farms 1500 acres raising corn and soybeans in Pierce, Knox and Antelope Counties. Mr. Wostrel has been in the farming business for over 40 years. Mr. Wostrel is very interested in renewable fuels and has taken two trips
with the



50



---

##### Table of Contents

Business Advisory Council to Washington, D.C. to lobby for renewable fuel legislation. Mr. Wostrel has served as Secretary of Husker Ag since June 2004.

Robert E. Brummels, of Coleridge, Nebraska, is a lifelong resident of Cedar County, Nebraska. He and his wife currently operate a
farm northeast of Coleridge where they raise corn, soybeans and alfalfa and own a cow-calf herd. Prior to his current farming operation, Mr. Brummels was in the dairy business from 1974 through 1986 and in the hog business from 1987 through 1998. In
1973 Mr. Brummels graduated from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Agriculture with a Bachelor of Science degree in animal science. Mr. Brummels has served as Treasurer of Husker Ag since June 2004.

Stanley Gybergis a self-employed farmer and has been actively engaged in farming for 38 years and currently operates an 800 acre farm with a corn
and soybean rotation. Mr. Gyberg currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of CORN-er Stone Farmers Co-op. Since 1980, Mr. Gyberg has served as the Clerk of the Kanaranzi Township. Mr. Gyberg is also currently the Chairman of the
Southwest Minnesota Farmers Co-op Elevator, a full service grain, agronomy and feed cooperative with sales between $30-40 million per year. The Southwest Minnesota Farmers Co-op Elevator is located in Luverne, Minnesotaand has over
500 members. Mr. Gyberg has served as a member of the Board of the Southwest Minnesota Farmers Co-op Elevatorfor 14 years and has served as the Chairman for the past 10 years. Mr. Gyberg has been married to his wife Irene for 40 years and
they have 3 grown children.

J. Alex Thramer is self-employed in the irrigation sales and services industry by Thramer Irrigation
located near Ewing, Nebraska which has been in operation for over 30 years.

David Kolsrud is the General Manager and a member of
the Board of Directors of CORN-er Stone Farmers Cooperative, which was formed in 1995 and served as Chairman until 2000. Mr. Kolsrud also continues to work as a self-employed farmer, an occupation he has had since 1973. He also serves as Chairman of
the Valley Springs Farmers Cooperative, a farm supply co-op in Valley Springs, South Dakota. He has served on that Valley Springs Board for 15 years and has served as Chairman for the past 12 years. Mr. Kolsrud formerly served as the Chairman of the
Minnesota Coalition for Ethanol. He also served on the Board of Governors of AGRI-Energy, LLC (a 12 million gallon a year ethanol plant in Luverne, Minnesota). He has served on the AGRI-Energy Board since 1997 and served as its Vice President until
1999.

Gary Kuester is the owner of Kuester Hay, a company that buys and sells alfalfa and grass hay located near Stanton, Nebraska.
Kuester Hay has been in business since 1979. Mr. Kuester has been involved in ethanol production for many years through a small ethanol production facility located on his family farm and has been licensed to produce ethanol since 1992.

David Stearnscurrently resides in Luverne, Minnesota, where he was born and raised. Mr. Stearns has been employed as a DDG Marketer with
Agri-Energy, L.P. a 12-million gallon per year ethanol plant located in Luverne, Minnesota, since August 1998. Mr. Stearns duties with Agri-Energy, L.P. include the selling and scheduling of sales of distiller grains, and management of the
scale office for all inbound and outbound commodities.

Ronald A. Fick, of Luverne, Minnesota,is self-employed and has
operated a corn and soybean grain farming operation (Harvest Farms) since 1973. He is also co-owner of a gravel and rock extraction business. Mr. Ficks operations are located just to the southwest of Luverne, Minnesota. Mr. Fick served on the
Sioux Valley Southwestern Electric Advisory Board for 11 years. He has served on the Rock County Fair Board of Directors for over 20 years, 3 years as President.

Kent A. Friedrich, of Plainview, Nebraska, has worked as an investment representative for an Edward Jones investment office in Norfolk, Nebraska, since 2002. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Friedrich worked as an
investment representative for Heritage Financial. He has previously served as an Associate Director for Battle Creek Farmers Co-op and on the nominating committee for Farm Credit Services. Mr. Friedrich and his wife Denise, along with their three
children, have been lifelong residents of Plainview, Nebraska. Mr. Friedrich and his wife have also operated a farming operation for over 20 years in the Plainview area.

James Hall, of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, is currently a director of Agri-Energy, L.P. Mr. Hall has been a farmer for 42 years in Southeast South Dakota. Mr. Hall is also currently President of the Lincoln
County Farm Bureau and the Lincoln County Soybean Association.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

O. Wayne Mitchell, of Willmar, Minnesota, is currently Senior Vice President, Technology and
Business Development for Fagen, Inc. and he has been employed by Fagen since June 2000. Fagen, Inc. is a design-build contractor specializing in the construction of ethanol plants. Prior to joining Fagen, he served as Process Team Leader from May
1998 to June 2000 for Reilly Industries, Inc., where he directed multidisciplinary teams engaged in chemical process research and development. From March 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Mitchell was President and owner of Solid Rock Consulting, LLC, a
private company providing consulting services to the ethanol industry. Solid Rock Consulting, LLC is currently inactive. From May 1996 to May 1998, he worked as Plant Manager and Quality Assurance Manager for Micronutrients, LLC, an animal feed
supplement manufacturer. Prior to joining Micronutrients, from January 1993 to May 1996, he served as the Design Engineer for Broin and Associates, Inc. where he performed detailed process design and start-up of dry grind ethanol plants. From August
1991 to January 1993, he served as senior environmental project engineer for Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. where he was involved in environmental consulting and project management at major oil refineries. Prior to that, Mr. Mitchell served
as an area manager for Ethyl Corporation. Mr. Mitchell serves on the Board of Directors of six ethanol plants, Badger State Ethanol, LLC, in Monroe, Wisconsin, Husker Ag, LLC, in Plainview, Nebraska, Platte Valley Fuel Ethanol, LLC in Central City,
Nebraska, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC in Friesland, Wisconsin, Western Wisconsin Energy, LLC in Boyceville, Wisconsin, and Bushmills Ethanol, LLC in Atwater, Minnesota. Both Badger State Ethanol, LLC, and United Wisconsin Grain Producers,
LLC, are SEC registered companies. Mr. Mitchell also serves on the Board of US BioEnergy Corporation which has an ethanol plant under construction in Albert City, Iowa. Mr. Mitchell has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison.

Gerald Winter, Class II nominee, of Luverne, Minnesota, is a lifelong resident of Rock County, Minnesota. He and
his family have been farming since 1960. He has served on numerous boards including as Chairman of the Rock County Rural Board and in the capacity of President of the congregation of his church. Mr. Winter has also been actively involved with
Agri-Energy, L.L.C., of Luverne, Minnesota from the time of its inception.

All officers have been elected to serve until the next succeeding annual
meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

Management

The Companys day to day affairs are managed by Seth Harder, General Manager and its executive officers who are appointed for one year terms, subject to oversight and supervision by its Board of Directors. In
January, 2006, Seth Harder was appointed General Manager by the Board of Directors, replacing Allen H. Sievertsen, who resigned effective December 31, 2005. Executive officers of the Company, and other significant employees of the Company, are
listed below:



|                        |  |                                                                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name and Age            |  | Current Position and Business History                              
|Fredrick Knievel (64)   |  | Chairman of the Board and President since June 29, 2004.1          
|                        | 
|Mike Kinney (48)        |  | Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President since June 29, 2004.2
|                        | 
|Leonard Wostrel (67)    |  | Secretary of the Company since June 29, 2004.                      
|                        | 
|Robert E. Brummels (55) |  | Treasurer of the Company since June 29, 2004.                      
|                        | 
|Seth Harder (27)        |  | General Manager since January 2006.3                               



|1 | - Fredrick Knievel was elected Chairman of the Board and President on June 29, 2004, replacing Gary Kuester who had been elected Chairman of the Board and President on March 24,
2003.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | - Mike Kinney was elected Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President on June 29, 2004, replacing former director Scott Carpenter who had been elected Vice Chairman of the
Board and Vice President on March 24, 2003 when Gary Kuester was elected Chairman and President.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3 | - Seth Harder was appointed as General Manager in January 2006, replacing Allen Sievertsen who left the Company on December 31, 2005.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



52



---

##### Table of Contents

Seth Harder, age 27, has been General Manager for Husker Ag since January 2006. Prior to this
appointment, Mr. Harder served as the Companys Plant Manager from September 2004 through December 2005. Prior to joining Husker Ag, Mr. Harder was an ethanol trainer and plant startup specialist from April 2004 through September 2004 for ICM,
Inc. Mr. Harder was the Production Manager from November 2002 until April 2004 for Husker Ag. From December 2001 through November 2002, Mr. Harder managed a small ethanol plant for Kuester Ag, LLC, which is owned by Gary Kuester, member of the Board
of Directors for Husker Ag.

Shaun Waldow, age 33, has been Plant Manager since January 2006. Prior to this position, Mr. Waldow had been
Production Manager since May 2004, and he was an operator for the Company from January 2003 to May 2004. Prior to working for Husker Ag, Mr. Waldow worked as a farm and livestock manager for Warren Wortman from 1992 until January 2003.

Kristine Wacker, age 31, has been Husker Ags Controller since January 2006. Prior to this position, Ms. Wacker has worked as the Companys
plant accountant since June 2004. Prior to her work for Husker Ag, Ms. Wacker worked as an accountant and reimbursement analyst for Faith Regional Health Services, from April 1999 through June 2004. From December 1996 through April 1999, Ms. Wacker
was a staff accountant for Auten, Sehi, Pruss and Beckmann, P.C.

Audit Committee

On January 8, 2002, Husker Ag adopted an Audit Committee Charter in compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and established an audit committee. On
November 12, 2004, Husker Ag amended the written charter of the Audit Committee and a copy of the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter is attached as an appendix to the Companys 2005 Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 29,
2005. The Audit Committee reviews the services provided by the Companys independent auditors, consults with the independent auditors and reviews the need for internal auditing procedures and the adequacy of internal controls. The Audit
Committee currently consists of Robert E. Brummels, who serves as the chairman of the committee, Kent Friedrich, Gary Kuester and Fredrick J. Knievel. There are no Audit Committee financial experts on the Husker Ag Board and Audit Committee. There
are a limited number of persons meeting the SEC requirements for an Audit Committee financial expert located in the Northeastern Nebraska communities in which the Company transacts business, or among investors in Husker Ag, who comprise the likely
base for persons serving on the Husker Ag Board. The Nominating Committee of Husker Ag will consider whether any nominees may have such expertise in reviewing and recommending candidates for the Board of Directors.

The Company has established an audit committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act and believes that the members of the Audit Committee
are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the National Association of Securities Dealers, the operators of The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Audit Committee held nine regularly scheduled or special meetings during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), requires the Companys officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of
the Companys equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners are required by SEC
regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a review of the copies of the Section 16(a) reports
and amendments thereto furnished to the Company and on written representations that no Form 5 reports were required, the Company believes that during fiscal year 2005, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, officers and
greater than 10% members were complied with.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

The Companys Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and principal accounting officer or other persons performing similar functions, including the General Manager, are required to comply with the Companys Code
of Ethics, adopted by the Company Board of Directors. The purpose of the Code of Ethics is to deter wrongdoing and to promote, among other things, honest and ethical conduct and to ensure that the Companys business is conducted in a
consistently legal and ethical manner. Concerns or complaints regarding ethical issues are treated on a confidential basis.

The Company will provide
without charge to any person requesting a copy of its Code of Ethics. A written request for such report should be directed to Fredrick J. Knievel, Chairman of the Board and President, Husker Ag, LLC, 54048 Highway 20, Plainview, Nebraska 68769. The
Companys Code of Ethics was also filed as an Exhibit to the 2003 Form 10-KSB which was filed with the SEC on March 30, 2004, and which is available through the SECs web site (www.sec.gov).



|ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|-------- | ----------------------

The following table sets forth all
compensation paid or payable by the Company during the past three fiscal years to the Companys President and Vice President and to the Companys General Manager who were serving in such capacities during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Annual Compensation



|                                                                                     |  |      |  |        |         |                        |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- |  | ------ | ------- | ---------------------- | - | ------
|Name and Principal Position                                                          |  | Year |  | Salary |         | All Other Compensation
|Fredrick J. Knievel1, Chairman of the Board and President since June 29, 2004        |  | 2005 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 4,9504
|                                                                                     |  | 2004 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 3,2004
|                                                                                     |  | 2003 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 2,1504
|Mike Kinney2, Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President since June 29, 2004      |  | 2005 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 4,1004
|                                                                                     |  | 2004 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 2,6504
|                                                                                     |  | 2003 |  | $      | 0       |                        | $ | 1,8004
|Allen H. Sievertsen3, General Manager from August 10, 2001 through December 31, 2005 |  | 2005 |  | $      | 122,202 |                        | $ | 2,2575
|                                                                                     |  | 2004 |  | $      | 103,333 |                        | $ | 2,2635
|                                                                                     |  | 2003 |  | $      | 101,000 |                        | $ | 1,3425



|1 | - Fredrick Knievel was elected Chairman of the Board and President on June 29, 2004, replacing Gary Kuester who had been elected Chairman of the Board and President on March 24,
2003. None of the individuals serving as Chairman of the Board and President received any salary or compensation for his services other than directors and committee meeting fees.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | - Mike Kinney was elected Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President on June 29, 2004, replacing former director Scott Carpenter who had been elected Vice Chairman of the
Board and Vice President on March 24, 2003 when Gary Kuester was elected Chairman and President. None of the individuals serving as Vice Chairman of the Board and Vice President received any salary or compensation for his services other than
directors and committee meeting fees.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3 | - Allen H. Sievertsen offered his resignation from the Company in December 2005. In January 20006, Seth Harder was appointed General Manager replacing Mr. Sievertsen.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4 | - Represents directors and committee meeting fees received for Board of Directors and committee meetings in accordance with the Companys policy regarding the payment
of directors fees.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5 | - Represents reimbursement of mileage expenses.
|- | -----------------------------------------------

Fredrick J.
Knievel is currently serving as the Companys President and Mike Kinney is currently serving as its Vice President. Neither Mr. Knievel nor Mr. Kinney is under any written contract to provide services to the Company, and neither has received
any compensation from the Company other than payment of directors fees. The Company has no written employment agreements with any officer or director. The Company reimburses its officers for expenses incurred relating to services rendered on
its behalf.

In December 2003, the Company revised the Board compensation policy, to provide that commencing January 1, 2004, directors will be paid $200
per meeting, if the director is present for the meeting through adjournment; otherwise the meeting fee remained at $100 per meeting. Then on December 22, 2005, the Company revised the Board compensation policy, commencing January 1, 2006, by
increasing the per meeting fee paid to directors for attendance at any Board meetings if the director is present in person at the



54



---

##### Table of Contents

meeting through adjournment to $300 per meeting for each director and to $400 per meeting for the Board Chairman; otherwise, the director is paid $100 per
meeting attended. The Company also pays each director $100 per committee meeting attended in person and $50 per committee meeting attended via telephone conference. In addition, directors are reimbursed at $0.445 per mile (as of January 1, 2006) for
mileage reimbursement for travel to and from meetings.

The Company does not have any compensatory security option plan for its executive officers and
directors. None of the directors or officers of the Company have any options, warrants or other similar rights to purchase securities of the Company.

Board Executive Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Companys executive officers have always been
members of the Board of Directors; and none of the Companys executive officers have ever been an employee of the Company. Like all other members of the board, the executive officers receive only directors fees for attendance at the board
and committee meetings. Until January 1, 2006, the Companys executive officers received the same per meeting directors fee as the other board members. However, as of January 1, 2006, the Chairman of the Board now receives $400 per
meeting attended in person, which compares to $300 per meeting for all other directors, including all other executive officers.

For purposes of
determining the Companys director fees, i.e., executive compensation, the entire Board of Directors serves as the de facto compensation committee. Because of the nature of the director fees paid to the Companys executive
officers, the Company believes that the board compensation committee report on executive compensation required by Item 402(k) of Regulation S-K is not applicable for Husker Ag.

As noted above, the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing the compensation and related benefits for the Companys employees, which includes the General Manager. Subject to
review and oversight by the Board of Directors, the General Manager is the manager of the Companys operations and he is not considered an executive officer. It has been the Boards policy to disclose the General Managers
compensation only if and when such annual compensation exceeds $100,000.

Executive Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As noted above, the entire Board of Directors serves as the executive compensation committee for purposes of determining the director fees to be
paid to board members, including the executive officers. All of the executive officers of the Company were members of the Board of Directors during 2005, including Fredrick Knievel, Chairman of the Board, Mike Kinney, Vice Chairman of the Board,
Leonard Wostrel, Secretary, and Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer. None of the members of the Board of Directors during 2005 or as of the date of this Form 10-K/A is or has been an employee of the Company. There were no transactions between any member
of the Board of Directors and the Company that occurred during 2005 which would require disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED MEMBER MATTERS
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table presents information regarding beneficial ownership of Membership Units of Husker Ag as of April 10, 2006 by (1) each member known by Husker Ag to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its
outstanding Membership Units and (2) each director of Husker Ag and each named executive officer and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. Based on information furnished by the owners, except as otherwise noted, management believes
that the members listed below have sole investment and voting power regarding their Membership Units, except that co-trustees share investment and voting power. (* = Less than 1% of the class of Membership Units).



|                                     |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------- | --- |  | ------------------ | -
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |  | UnitsBeneficiallyOwned |     |  | Percentageof Class |  
|Gary Kuester                         |  | 2                      |     |  | *                  |  
|56723 835 Road                       |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Stanton, NE 68779                    |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Fredrick J. Knievel                  |  | 60                     | (1) |  | *                  |  
|51272 846 Rd.                        |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Clearwater, NE 68726                 |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Mike Kinney                          |  | 110                    | (2) |  | *                  |  
|51100 836 Road                       |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Elgin, NE 68636                      |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|J. Alex Thramer                      |  | 50                     | (3) |  | *                  |  
|Box 278                              |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Ewing, NE 68735                      |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|James Hall                           |  | 2,120                  | (4) |  | 13.83              | %
|26941 480thAve.                      |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Sioux Falls, SD 57108                |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|David A. Kolsrud                     |  | 300                    | (5) |  | 1.96               | %
|203 81stStreet                       |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Beaver Creek, MN 56116               |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Ronald A. Fick                       |  | 610                    | (6) |  | 3.98               | %
|1159 101stStreet                     |  |                        |     |  |                    |  
|Luverne, MN 56156                    |  |                        |     |  |                    |  

---

|(1) | Includes 30 Membership Units held by him and his wife as joint tenants with respect to which Mr. Knievel may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive
power.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Includes 10 Membership Units held by him and his wife as joint tenants with respect to which Mr. Kinney may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive power
and also includes 100 Membership Units held by Kinney, Inc. for which Mr. Kinney has shared voting and dispositive power.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Includes 20 Membership Units held by him and his wife as joint tenants with respect to which Mr. Thramer may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive
power.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Includes 110 Membership Units owned by Mr. Hall individually and 510 membership units held indirectly by him as a member of The Better Energy Company, LLC. This
amount also includes 1,500 membership units of Agri-Energy, L.P. of which Mr. Hall is a director, with respect to which Mr. Hall may be regarded as having sole voting and dispositive power.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(5) | Includes 170 Membership Units held indirectly by him as a member of The Better Energy Company, LLC. This amount does not include Membership Units of Agri-Energy,
L.P. of which Mr. Kolsrud is a partner.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(6) | Includes 510 membership units held indirectly by Mr. Fick as a member of The Better Energy Company, LLC.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



56



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                     |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------- | ---- |  | ------------------ | -
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |  | UnitsBeneficiallyOwned |      |  | Percentageof Class |  
|O. Wayne Mitchell                    |  | -0-                    |      |  | -0-                |  
|2001 Country Club Drive NE           |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Willmar, MN 56201                    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Stanley A. Gyberg                    |  | 90                     | (7)  |  | *                  |  
|676 150 Avenue                       |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Luverne, MN 56156                    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Robert E. Brummels                   |  | 400                    | (8)  |  | 2.61               | %
|56849 876 Road                       |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Coleridge, NE 68727                  |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|David Stearns                        |  | 105                    | (9)  |  | *                  |  
|1110 N. Kniss                        |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Luverne, MN 56156                    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Leonard Wostrel                      |  | -0-                    |      |  | -0-                |  
|86752 Highway 13                     |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Creighton, NE 68729                  |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Kent A. Friedrich                    |  | 150                    | (10) |  | *                  |  
|53695 865 Road                       |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Plainview, NE 68769                  |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Seth Harder                          |  | -0-                    |      |  | -0-                |  
|410 N Main Street                    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Osmond, NE 68765                     |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Class II Nominee                     |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Gerald Winter                        |  | 190                    | (11) |  | 1.24               | %
|678 90thAvenue                       |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Luverne, MN 56156                    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Beneficial Owners of More than 5%    |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|The Better Energy Company, LLC       |  | 3,060                  |      |  | 19.98              | %
|638 51stStreet                       |  |                        |      |  |                    |  
|Hills, Minnesota 56138               |  |                        |      |  |                    |  

---

|(7) | This amount does not include the 3,060 membership units owned by the Better Energy Company,
LLC of which Mr. Gyberg owns 5.62%, nor any membership units of Agri-Energy, L.P., of which Mr. Gyberg is a partner and Mr. Gyberg disclaims beneficial ownership of such membership units.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(8) | These units are owned by a revocable trust in which Mr. Brummels and his wife are trustees
and beneficial owners, with respect to which Mr. Brummels may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive power.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(9) | These units are owned by Mr. Stearns and his wife as joint tenants with respect to which Mr.
Stearns may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive power.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(10) | These units are owned by Mr. Friedrich and his wife as tenants in common with respect to
which Mr. Friedrich may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive power.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(11) | Includes 20 Membership Units held by Mr. Winter and his wife as joint tenants with respect to
which Mr. Winter may be regarded as having shared voting and dispositive power. This amount also includes 170 Membership Units held indirectly by him as a member of The Better Energy Company, LLC.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



57



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                     |  |                        |  |                    |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------ | -
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |  | UnitsBeneficiallyOwned |  | Percentageof Class |  
|Miltona Bay, LLC                     |  | 940                    |  | 6.14               | %
|108 Miller Circle                    |  |                        |  |                    |  
|Granite Falls, Minnesota 56241       |  |                        |  |                    |  
|                                     |  |                       
|Agri-Energy, L.P.                    |  | 1,500                  |  | 9.79               | %
|502 South Walnut Ave.                |  |                        |  |                    |  
|Luverne, Minnesota 56156             |  |                        |  |                    |  

The following table sets forth certain information as to the Membership Units beneficially owned by all executive
officers and directors of the Company, including in this case the General Manager, as a group (14 persons) as of April 10, 2006:



|                 |  |                                           |  |                 
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Title of Class   |  | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |  | Percent of Class
|Membership Units |  | 3,9971                                    |  | 26.1%           



|1 | - Includes 815 Membership Units with respect to which members of the group may be regarded as having shared voting power and/or shared investment power.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------

Conflicts of
interest may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between and among its members, officers, directors and their affiliates, although its officers and directors have fiduciary duties to Husker Ag. Husker Ag does not have a committee of
independent directors or members or an otherwise disinterested body to consider transactions or arrangements that result from conflicts of interest. The Companys Operating Agreement permits Husker Ag to enter into agreements with directors,
officers, members and their affiliates, provided that any such transactions are on terms no more favorable to the directors, officers, members (or their affiliates) than generally afforded to non-affiliated parties in a similar transaction.

The Company has adopted an Affiliated Transactions Policy, which provides as follows concerning transactions with affiliated persons or entities:

All material affiliated transactions and loans will be made or entered into on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than those
that can be obtained from unaffiliated third parties, and that all material affiliated transactions and loans, or any forgiveness of loans must:

(a) be approved by a majority of the Companys independent directors who do not have an interest in the transaction(s); or

(b) be approved by the affirmative vote of members holding a majority of the outstanding membership interests, excluding the membership
interests of members having an interest in the transaction(s); or

(c) be established to have been fair to the Company when
the transaction is judged according to the circumstances at the time of the commitment.

Notwithstanding anything in the Affiliated
Transaction Policy to the contrary, all sales of corn and other feedstock by directors, officers, members or other affiliated parties to the Company, and all



58



---

##### Table of Contents

purchases of ethanol, distillers grains and other co-products by directors, officers, members or other affiliated parties from the Company, shall not
require any of the approvals described above, provided, the purchase or sale price is equal to the then current market price and the transaction is on terms no less favorable than those that can be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

In the normal course of business the Company sells to and purchases from its board of directors, members and key employees under normal terms and
conditions and in accordance with the Companys Affiliated Transactions Policy. See Notes 3 and 8 to the Condensed Financial Statements for additional information on related party transactions.

On January 25, 2004, the Husker Ag Board of Directors adopted a Policy on Marketing which, among other things, provides that commencing April 1, 2004, no employee of
Husker Ag, no member of the Board of Directors, and no person performing marketing functions for the Company, shall haul or have any ownership interest in trucks or entities which haul the Companys products.

On December 16, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to enter into a SIMPLE IRA retirement plan with American Funds for its employees.
Edward Jones is the Companys authorized broker dealer for its employees investment in the retirement plan with American Funds. Kent Friedrich, elected to the Companys Board of Directors in 2005, is Edward Jones investment
representative working with the Company. Edward Jones and Mr. Friedrich are compensated based upon the amount of employee contributions made to the retirement plan. While this arrangement was entered into before Mr. Friedrich submitted his
nomination to the Board, it complies with the Companys Affiliated Transaction Policy. On April 26, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors ratified the Companys arrangement with American Funds and Edward Jones.

Except for the SIMPLE IRA retirement plan with Mr. Friedrich and certain transactions in the ordinary course of business referred to above, the Company had not entered
into any such agreements with any of its directors, officers, members or their affiliates.



|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|-------- | --------------------------------------

BKD, LLP, the
Companys independent certified public accountants for the three year period ended December 31, 2005, performed various audit, audit-related, tax and other services for Husker Ag. The following table represents fees for professional audit
services rendered by BKD, LLP for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and fees for other services rendered by BKD, LLP during those periods:



|                    |  |      |         |      |   |        
|------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|Type of Service     |  | 2005 |         | 2004
|Audit Fees1         |  | $    | 80,055  |      | $ | 85,400 
|Audit-Related Fees2 |  |      | 5,596   |      |   | 30,830 
|Tax Fees3           |  |      | 16,800  |      |   | 24,845 
|Reimbursed Expenses |  |      | 12,083  |      |   | 8,813  
|All Other Fees      |  |      | -0-     |      |   | -0-    
|                    |  |      |         |      |   |        
|Total               |  | $    | 114,534 |      | $ | 149,888



|1 | - Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit and reviews of the Companys quarterly financial statements included in the reports on Forms 10-Q and
10-QSB and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2 | - Principally accounting consultation.
|- | --------------------------------------



|3 | - Includes $14,000 in 2005 and $13,000 in 2004 for tax preparation, and $2,800 in 2005 and $11,845 in 2004 for tax compliance, advice, and planning.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. In accordance with Section 10(A)(i) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Company Audit Committee
approves the engagement of our independent accountants to render audit and non-audit services before those services are rendered, considering, among other things, whether the proposed engagement would impact the independence of the auditors. All of
the fees of BKD, LLP reflected above were approved by the Audit Committee.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following exhibits and financial statements are filed as part
of, or are incorporated by reference into, this report:

(1) Financial Statements  An index to the Companys financial statements
is located above on page 33 of this report. The financial statements appear on page 34 through page 48 of this report.

(2) Financial
Statement Schedules  The Companys unaudited quarterly financial information is located on page 49 above under Item 8  Supplementary Financial Information. All other supplemental schedules are omitted because of the absence of
conditions under which they are required or because the information shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits
 The exhibits we have filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein are set forth on the attached Exhibit Index.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|              |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                          
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                            |  | Method of Filing                                                                                                                                                                         
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|3.1           |  | Articles of Organization, as amended                                                                                                   |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 filed on August 14, 2002.                                                                      
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|3.2           |  | Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Company, dated as of August 31, 2005, and including Amendment Nos. 1 through 11 |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 filed on November 14, 2005.                                                                 
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.1          |  | Agreement with the Nebraska Department of Agriculture                                                                                  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (SEC Registration No. 333-60580, as amended (the 1933 Act Registration Statement) filed on May 10,
2001.
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.2          |  | Contract Labor Agreement with Allen Sievertsen                                                                                         |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (SEC Registration No. 333-60580, as amended (the 1933 Act Registration Statement) filed on May 10,
2001.
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.3          |  | Design Build Contract with Fagen, Inc. and ICM, Inc. dated November 30, 2001                                                           |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 filed on March 29, 2002.                                                              
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.4          |  | Contract Change Order to the Design Build Contract dated August 7, 2002 between the Company and Fagen, Inc.                            |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 filed on November 14, 2002.                                                               
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.5          |  | Track Agreement dated August 29, 2002 between the Company and Nebraska Northeastern Railroad Company                                   |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 filed on November 14, 2002.                                                               
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.6          |  | Promissory Note, dated January 20, 2004, to Stearns Bank, National Association (Loan No. 57748)                                        |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004.                                                                  
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.7          |  | Promissory Note, dated January 20, 2004, to Stearns Bank, National Association (Loan No. 57749)                                        |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004.                                                                  
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.8          |  | Promissory Note, dated January 20, 2004 to Stearns Bank, National Association (Loan No. 57750)                                         |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004.                                                                  
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.9          |  | Business Loan Agreement, dated January 20, 2004 with Stearns Bank, National Association                                                |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004.                                                                  
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.10         |  | Commercial Loan Agreement with Union Bank and Midwest Bank, dated February 22, 2005                                                    |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2005.                                                                                                          
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.11         |  | Promissory Note dated February 22, 2005 to Union Bank for a single advance term loan                                                   |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2005.                                                                                                          
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.12         |  | Promissory Note dated February 22, 2005 to Midwest Bank for a revolving line of credit                                                 |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2005.                                                                                                          
|              |  |                                                                                                                                       
|10.13         |  | Commercial Security Agreement with Union Bank and Midwest Bank, dated February 22, 2005                                                |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2005.                                                                                                          



61



---

##### Table of Contents

|              |  |                                                                                                                                         |  |                                                                                                                        
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description                                                                                                                             |  | Method of Filing                                                                                                       
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.14         |  | Real Estate Deed of Trust dated February 22, 2005 in favor of Union Bank and Midwest Bank                                               |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2005.                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.15         |  | Agreement dated March 24, 2003, between the Company and Rite Way Oil & Gas Co., Inc.*                                                   |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005.
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.16         |  | Ethanol Production Credit Agreement dated September 5, 2001, between the Company and the State of Nebraska                              |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005.
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.17         |  | Risk Management and Ethanol Marketing Contract dated May 31, 2005, by and among the Company, FCStone, LLC, and Eco-Energy, Inc.*        |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 filed on August 15, 2005.      
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.18         |  | Subscription Agreement dated December 28, 2005, with Val-E Ethanol, LLC                                                                 |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2005.                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.19         |  | Commercial Loan Agreement with Union Bank, dated December 28, 2005                                                                      |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2005.                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.20         |  | Promissory Note dated December 28, 2005 to Union Bank for a single advance term loan                                                    |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2005.                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|10.21         |  | Extension Agreement dated February 22, 2006 with Midwest Bank, N.A.                                                                     |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2006.                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|14.1          |  | Husker Ag, LLC Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers adopted by the Board of Directors on March 26, 2004 |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 30, 2004.
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|99.1          |  | Companys Trading System Rules and Procedures approved by the Board of Directors on January 22, 2005 and amended as of August 31, 2005  |  | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2005.                                          
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|31(i).1       |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)                                                   |  | Filed herewith.                                                                                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|31(i).2       |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)                                                   |  | Filed herewith.                                                                                                        
|              |  |                                                                                                                                        
|32.1          |  | Section 1350 Certifications, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                              |  | Filed herewith.                                                                                                        

---

|* | - Material has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and such materials have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



62



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto authorized.



|                      |  |                |  |                                                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | HUSKER AG, LLC
|                      |  |               
|Date: April 28, 2006. |  | By:            |  | /s/ Fredrick J. Knievel                                                                         
|                      |  |                |  | Fredrick J. Knievel, Chairman of the Board, President
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|                      |  |               
|Date: April 28, 2006. |  | By:            |  | /s/ Robert E. Brummels                                                                          
|                      |  |                |  | Robert E. Brummels, Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)                        



63