alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015156EN.01002401.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/24

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2015/958

of 17 June 2015

on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED) (EUNAVFOR MED/1/2015)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/778 of 18 May 2015 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED) (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/778, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for EUNAVFOR MED. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/778, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for EUNAVFOR MED.

| (2) | The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Rear Admiral Andrea GUEGLIO as the EU Force Commander for EUNAVFOR MED. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Rear Admiral Andrea GUEGLIO as the EU Force Commander for EUNAVFOR MED.

| (3) | The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation.

| (4) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Rear Admiral Andrea GUEGLIO is hereby appointed EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2015.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 122, 19.5.2015, p. 31.

1

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Fuel Qualification for Molten Salt Reactors (NUREG/CR-7299, ORNL/TM-2022/2754)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7299 (PDF – 1.07 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2022**Date Published:** December 2022**Prepared by:**D. HolcombW. Poore (Retired)G. Flanagan

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryP.O. Box 2008Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6283

Christopher Van Wert, NRC Technical LeadRichard Rivera, NRC Project ManagerStewart Magruder, NRC Project Manager (Retired)

**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report supports the development and review of an efficient methodology or process for liquid salt fuel system qualification. The report describes the technical issues encountered when developing an adequate understanding of the fuel salt’s chemical and physical behavior under both normal and accident conditions. The concepts presented in this report align with the fundamental safety functions (FSFs) approach of the more general non-light water reactor (non-LWR) fuel qualification guidance provided in NUREG-2246. However, because liquid salt fuel has substantial technical differences from solid fuels, this report describes tailored approaches for achieving the common safety intents when using liquid salt.

The purpose of this report is to illustrate how variations in fuel salt properties impact achievement of FSFs at liquid-salt fueled molten salt reactors (MSRs). The focus on FSFs supports methodology compatibility with both current and developing licensing processes. Customized fuel qualification guidance for liquid salt–fueled Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) are also provided in this report to supplement the generic non-LWR guidance recently developed by the NRC. As with the broader non-LWR fuel qualification, this report focuses on identification and understanding of fuel life-limiting failure and fuel salt property degradation mechanisms that occur as a result of irradiation during reactor operation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 06, 2022
P.1 

OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

18) ll-B-72 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:19 AM Sheet 18 of 95 
A-90-19 

ll-B-72 

P.2 

PENDING CONFIDENTIAL 

The following information is located in the ^Cu\'iL"IifeiHilfflypKET 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, January 1991, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/n-Butyl Acrylate. 56 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-72.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1541 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1541

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE LUNETTE BLAIR.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to authorize establishment of the Fort 
Scott National Historic Site, Kansas, and for other purposes.'', 
approved October 19, 1978 (Public Law 95-484) is amended--
            (1) in the first section--
                    (A) by inserting ``only'' after ``donation''; and
                    (B) by striking ``: Provided, that the buildings so 
                acquired shall not include the structure known as 
                `Lunette Blair'''; and
            (2) in section 2--
                    (A) by striking ``When the site of'' and inserting 
                ``(a) When the site of''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The boundary of the Fort Scott National Historic Site 
established under subsection (a) is modified as generally depicted on 
the map referred to as `Fort Scott National Historic Site Proposed 
Boundary Modification', numbered 471/80,057C, and dated February 
2017.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1541

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
                       as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Omega Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence Hartman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




Dated: July 17, 2006                         /s/ Lawrence Hartman
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Lawrence Hartman, Chief Executive
                                             Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Carmella Astuto, Appellant, v Michael Hogan, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 761]

In an action to recover damages for medi*693cal malpractice, etc., the plaintiff appeals from of judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered May 14, 1993, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s contention that the trial court’s charge on the cause of action for lack of informed consent as it relates to proximate cause was erroneous is without merit. The trial court correctly informed the jury several times, in both its initial charge and its supplemental instructions, that in order to find in favor of the plaintiff the jury had to conclude that the operation which was allegedly performed on her without her informed consent was the proximate cause of her injuries *(see, Flores v Flushing Hosp. & Med. Ctr.,*109 AD2d 198). Moreover, while the interrogatory which dealt with proximate cause and lack of informed consent may have been imprecise, that interrogatory was never considered by the jury, which concluded that the defendant did not depart from good and accepted medical practice in failing to obtain the informed consent of the plaintiff. Finally, the trial court’s supplemental charge on lack of informed consent properly left determination of the issue of what information should reasonably be disclosed in order to obtain informed consent to the jury *(see, Hylick v Halweil,*112 AD2d 400; *Lipsius v White,*91 AD2d 271).

Also without merit is the plaintiff’s contention that her motion for judgment during trial should have been granted. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the defendant, it is clear that the trier of fact had a rational basis for finding in favor of the defendant *(see, Lipsius v White,*91 AD2d 271, *supra).*Thus, the trial court properly left the question of malpractice to the jury’s determination.

We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20161

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAM AHMAD KHEIR,

Defendant-Appellant

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-4258 & H-90-CR-121-1

- - - - - - - - - -

November 1, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sam Ahmad Kheir, # 52978-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his motion to

vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Kheir’s arguments on appeal

differ from those he presented to the district court. Kheir’s district court arguments are deemed

abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). Kheir’s appellate arguments that were not raised below are reviewed for plain error. 
2

Highlands Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire, 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied,

115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). Having reviewed the record and Kheir’s appellate arguments regarding his

claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, we find that any errors that may have existed did not

cause prejudice sufficient to warrant relief under § 2255. See United States v. Smith, 915 F.2d

959, 963 (5th Cir. 1990). Certainly, they do not rise to the level of plain error.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             9,172
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     11,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  34,238
<PP&E>                                             7,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                     3,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    49,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             18,538
<BONDS>                                           15,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                              22
<OTHER-SE>                                         8,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      49,818
<SALES>                                            3,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  18,948
<CGS>                                              4,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      4,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  12,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (3,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  211
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (1,823)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,612)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.12)


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Test Facility Description (NUREG/CR-6976)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6976, (PDF - 11.74 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2008**Date Published:** July 2010

**Prepared by:** E.R. Rosal, T.F. Lin, I.S. McClellan, R.C. Brewer

The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6855

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes the Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) Test Facility which is designed to conduct systematic separate effects tests under well-controlled laboratory conditions in order to generate fundamental rod bundle heat transfer data from single phase cooling tests, low flow boiling tests, steam flow tests with and without droplets injection, inverted annular film boiling tests, and dispersed flow film boiling heat transfer tests in rod bundles. The facility is capable of operating in steady state forced and variable reflood modes covering a wide range of flow and heat transfer conditions at pressures from 0.134 to 0.402 MPa (20 to 60 psia). The RBHT Test Facility is a unique facility which will provide new data for the fundamental development of best estimate computer codes to enhance our understanding of the complex two-phase phenomena, which are modeled for the reflood transient.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3974

_____________________________

LEAH SIMMS, TERRI LEIGH 

JONES, TONYA SUE CHAVIS, and

LESLIE ANDERSON-ADAMS,

Appellants,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT 

OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL 

REGULATION and JONATHAN 

ZACHEM, Secretary, in his 

official capacity, and

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, and DMS Secretary,

ERIN ROCK, in her official 

capacity,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

July 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Gary Lee Printy of Law Office of Gary Lee Printy, Tallahassee, for 

Appellants.

Ross Marshman, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Alison A. Parker, 

Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Department 

of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for 

Appellees Department of Business and Professional Regulation 

and Jonathan Zachem, Secretary.

Richard C. Swank and James J. Parry, Assistant General 

Counsels, Office of General Counsel, Department of Management 

Services, Tallahassee, for Appellees Department of Management 

Services, and DMS Secretary, Erin Rock.
No. 86-931.

#### Machleder *v.*CBS Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
TABLE 30. SHEEP FRESH MANURE CHARACTERISTICS *

==================================================================================

Parameter Unitsa Total Parameter Concentration Parameter Mass

No of ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------lb/day/-----------

Observ minimum maximum median mean std dev head 1000 lb

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manureb lb/60 lb/day 29 1.4 4.3 2.2 2.4 0.65 2.4 40

Urine %manure 10 20 50 38 37 8.6 0.87 15

Density lb/ft3 11 59 65 62 62 2.1 - -

TS %wb 39 15 46 26 28 6.9 0.67 11

TSS %db 1 80 80 80 80 - 0.54 9.0

VS %db 12 75 86 82 82 3.2 0.55 9.1

BOD5 mg/kg 8 16421 47784 27937 27938 11317 0.067 1.1

COD mg/kg 33 162126 351691 268961 264002 48491 0.63 11

TOC mg/kg 2 29955 41025 35490 35490 5535 0.085 1.4

TKN lb/ton 38 12 31 20 21 5.7 0.025 0.42

NH3N %tkn 1 28 28 28 28 - 0.0069 0.12

P2O5 lb/ton 36 5.1 18 9.2 9.4 2.8 0.011 0.19

PO4 %p2o5 3 20 58 33 37 16 0.0042 0.069

K2O lb/ton 37 6.7 31 19 19 6.3 0.023 0.38

B lb/ton 2 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.00010 0.000024 0.00040

Ca lb/ton 7 3.4 21 12 12 5.0 0.014 0.23

Cd lb/ton 1 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 - 0.00000043 0.0000072

Cl lb/ton 1 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 - 0.0053 0.089

Cr lb/ton 1 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 - 0.0000017 0.000029

Cu lb/ton 6 0.0072 0.015 0.0098 0.010 0.0023 0.000012 0.00020

Fe lb/ton 5 0.27 0.48 0.32 0.34 0.072 0.00041 0.0068

Mg lb/ton 7 1.4 3.7 2.6 2.8 0.86 0.0033 0.056

Mn lb/ton 4 0.020 0.051 0.036 0.036 0.016 0.000042 0.00071

Mo lb/ton 4 0.00033 0.046 0.0020 0.012 0.019 0.000015 0.00025

Na lb/ton 4 1.8 5.5 4.1 3.9 1.3 0.0047 0.078

Ni lb/ton estc - - - 0.013 - 0.000016 0.00026

Pb lb/ton 1 0.0042 0.0042 0.0042 0.0042 - 0.0000050 0.000084

S lb/ton 4 1.6 2.0 1.8 1.8 0.14 0.0021 0.035

Zn lb/ton 5 0.038 0.11 0.050 0.058 0.026 0.000070 0.0012

ADF %db 2 49 64 57 57 7.5 0.38 6.3

CF %db 1 33 33 33 33 - 0.22 3.7

CP %db 3 13 17 16 15 1.7 0.10 1.7

EE %db 1 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 - 0.019 0.32

NDF %db 2 59 72 66 66 6.5 0.44 7.3

EC cols/100 gm 2 6.30E+07 9.40E+08 5.02E+08 5.02E+08 4.40E+08 5.45E+09 9.09E+10

FC cols/100 gm 3 1.60E+08 1.60E+09 1.60E+09 1.12E+09 6.80E+08 1.21E+10 2.02E+11

FS cols/100 gm 5 3.50E+07 3.80E+09 9.10E+07 1.56E+09 1.83E+09 1.69E+10 2.82E+11

TC cols/100 gm 4 4.50E+07 1.60E+09 1.73E+08 4.98E+08 6.39E+08 5.40E+09 9.00E+10

==================================================================================

* References:Biological & Agricultural Engineering Dept, North Carolina State University, Jan 1994.

Agronomic Division, North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services.

a

 All concentrations as is or wet basis (wb) except as noted dry matter basis (db); all mass values wb.

b

 Feces and urine as voided.

c

 Mean value extrapolated from other data; measured values not available.

Sheep-Fresh Manure file:///G:/Share/EMRAD 2007-2011/2011/4-30/References/Biomass - M...

1 of 1 1/13/2011 11:55 AM
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on    its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized and the    undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that    (1) this Report complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in    this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/  RALPH    BARTEL    Ralph Bartel*Chairman of the Board and**Chief Executive Officer*     Date: March 17, 2008     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as    part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
\

---

Exhibit 99.13

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I, Chris
Puchner, CPG, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure
regarding the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the
Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form
40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form
of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ Chris Puchner                        
| | --- | -----------------------------------------
| |     | Chris Puchner, CPG                       
| |     | Chief Geologist                          
| |     | International Tower Hill Mines
      Ltd.

---