alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP/MOD2 Calculations of OECD-LOFT Test LP-SB-01 (NUREG/IA-0012)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0012 (PDF 1.26 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** January 1990

**Prepared by:** P.C. Hall, G. Brown

Central Electricity Generating Board Barnwood, Gloucester GL4 7RS United Kingdom

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

To assist CEGB in assessing the capabilities and status of RELAP5/MOD2, the code has been used to simulate SBLOCA test LP-SB-O1 carried out in the LOFT experimental reactor under the OECD LOFT programme. This test simulated a 1.0% hot leg break in a PWR, withi.early tripping of the primary coolant circulating pumps. This report compares the results of the RELAP5/MOD2 analysis with experimental measurements.

Comparison of the present calculation with earlier RELAP5/MOD1 calculations shows that significant improvements have been made. Most notably, the horizontal stratification model in MOD2 was found to enable improved calculation of fluid density close to the break in this test. In addition mass conservation errors, numerical stability and the computer run time were all greatly improved, compared with an earlier CEGB analysis using MODi.

The major difference between the RELAP5/MOD2 results and the experimental data is in the critical discharge flow rate. It is concluded that!-the error arises from thermal disequilibrium effects in thei discharge nozzle which are not modelled in the code. However, the discrepancies are not considered unduly significant for safety analysis of small break loss of coolant accidents in nuclear power plants, since in this application such effects would normally be allowed for by performing sensitivity studies to break size, orientation, etc.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project (NUREG/CR-7110)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 86-883.

#### Nescco, Inc., et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 4.3
                                   -----------



                               [LETTERHEAD OF BNS]


                                                              April 29, 2003
Hemosol, Inc.
2585 Meadowpine Blvd.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 8H9

Attention:  Mr. L. Hartwell, Chief Financial Officer

Dear Sirs:

           The Bank of Nova Scotia (the "Bank") hereby refers to the letter from
the Bank to Hemosol Inc. (the "Borrower") dated October 25, 2002, and accepted
by the Borrower on October 25, 2002 (the "Commitment Letter").

           Subject to your acceptance hereunder, the Commitment Letter is hereby
amended as follows:

CREDIT NUMBER 01
----------------

Delete:
-------

DRAWDOWN

           $10,000,000 of the Credit is to be drawn down by February 28, 2003
           and the Credit is to be fully drawn down by April 30, 2003. The
           Bank's obligation to advance the Credit shall be terminated to the
           extent it is not drawn on April 30, 2003.

           Advances are to be made in minimum multiples of $5,000,000

Add:
----

           $10,000,000 of the Credit is to be drawn down by February 28, 2003
           and the Credit is to be fully drawn down by August 31, 2003. The
           Bank's obligation to advance the Credit shall be terminated to the
           extent it is not drawn on August 31, 2003.

           Advances are to be made in minimum multiples of $2,000,000

<PAGE>
FEE

           An Extension Fee of $15,000 is payable upon acceptance of this
           Letter.

CREDIT NUMBER 02
----------------

           The Credit is cancelled.

           In all other respects, the Commitment Letter remains unchanged.

           If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign the enclosed copy
of this letter in the space indicated below and return the letter to us by close
of business on April 30, 2003.

                                                 Yours very truly,


/s/ J. Zelikovitz                              /s/ A.M. Eastman
------------------------------                 --------------------------------
J. Zelikovitz                                  A.M. Eastman
Senior Relationship Manager                    Vice President
                                               Commercial Banking


           The arrangements set out above are hereby acknowledged and accepted
by:

                                               GUARANTOR

HEMOSOL, INC.                                  MDS INC.
Name:                                          Name:

By: /s/ Lee Hartwell                           By: /s/ Peter Winkley
    --------------------------                     ----------------------------
Title:VP/CFO                                       Title Peter Winkley
                                                         Vice President, Finance


By: /s/ Dirk Alkema                            By:
    --------------------------                     ----------------------------
Title:V.P. Operations                              Title

Date: April 30, 2003                               Date: 30/4/03
Exhibit
23.2
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Nile
Therapeutics, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-152283) and Form S-3 (File No.
333-161339) of our report dated March 10, 2009, on the financial statements
of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and for the year then
ended (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes and
explanatory paragraph relating to Nile Therapeutics, Inc.’s ability to continue
as a going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nile
Therapeutics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
  /s/
Hays & Company LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 March 2,
2010
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Publications Available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

*Reports or brochures on regulatory decisions, results of research, results of incident investigations, and other technical and administrative information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, January 11, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, January 11, 2024
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of certain 

definitions pertaining to unlawful sexual conduct, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2017 

Mrs. ROBY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope 

of certain definitions pertaining to unlawful sexual conduct, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Child Protec5 tion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF ILLICIT SEXUAL 

7 CONDUCT. 

8 Section 2423(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

9 is amended— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1862 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘a sexual act (as defined in sec2 tion 2246) with’’ and inserting ‘‘any conduct involv3 ing’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘if the sexual act’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘if the conduct’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF FEDERAL SEX OF7 FENSE. 

8 Section 3559 of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (e)(2)(A)— 

11 (A) by inserting after ‘‘2244(a)(1)’’ the 

12 following ‘‘or 2244(a)(5)’’; 

13 (B) by striking the ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘2423(a)’’; 

14 (C) by striking ‘‘into prostitution’’; and 

15 (D) by inserting ‘‘or 2423(c) (relating to 

16 illicit sexual conduct)’’ before the semicolon at 

17 the end; and 

18 (2) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ‘‘or 

19 2423(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘, 2423(a), or 2423(c)’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2790

LAURIE B. FOOTE; IRA T. FOOTE, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus DONALD H. BARTON; DAWSON HOESED; LANDON DEAL; PEGGY SINGLETON; EDDIE LANCE; MIKE THORPE; DAVID BABB; KELVIN PHILLIPS; RICHARD WORLEY; PAUL AVERETTE; TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-98-117-1) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laurie B. Foote, Ira T. Foote, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. Ronald G. Blanchard, Hendersonville, North Carolina; Cynthia Stubbs Lopez, ROBERTS & STEVENS, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina; Grady Michael Barnhill, Patrick T. Gillen, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Laurie and Ira Foote appeal the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983; 42 U.S.C.A. § 1985; and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1986 (West Supp. 1998), and dismissing without prejudice any state supplemental claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foote v. Barton , No. CA-98-117-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1998). In addition, we have reviewed the record and find the pleadings do not set forth a claim for denial of equal protection. See Sylvia Dev. Corp. v. Calvert County, Md. , 48 F.3d 810, 819 (4th Cir. 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

464441521

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jul 10, 2013 08:56 AM EDT 162

Total Attended

27

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Karim Amrane US 2111 Wilson Blvd, #500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

ashley armstrong US 1000 Indepdendence Ave Washington DC DOE 20585

Jeff Bauman US 539 Dunksferry Rd. Bensalem PA National Refrigeration & Air Conditioning 19020

John Bean US 801 Corporate Centre Drive O'fallon MO Schneider 63368

Rodney Beever US 491 E. princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

Kevin Eicher US 10001 reunion place suite 500 San ANtonio TX Friedrich A/C 78216

Jeremiah Freeman US DOE Washington DC New West 20585

Kevin Grundy CA 54117 Best LIne Aylmer ON Change'Air Products N5H2R3

Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VA AHRI 23834

Dave Kelley US 1050 Dearborn Dr. Columbus OH Emerson Network Power 43085

Greg Kohler US 1500 Dekoven Ave Racine WI Modine Manufacturing Company 53403

Michael Kojak US 8932 Cedar Breaks Drive Plano TX UL 75025

Yan Lu US 755 College Rd. East Princeton NJ research 08540

Ted Marwitz US 230 W. Blueridge Ave. Orange CA Data Aire Inc 92865

David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 19020

George Morehouse US 99 Washington Ave. Albany NY NYS Dept. of State, Codes Division 12231

Vincent Mucciola US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Comfort Products 19020

Wes Roan US 1914 Randolph Drive Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

Carl Roberts US 110 N. Oakridge Dr North Prairie WI Zero Zone, Inc 53153

Alicia Simonsson US 202 S. Walnut Fairmount IN Solar Retrofit & Restoration 46928

Knute Svenson US 1200 19th St NW Washington DC Navigant Consulting 20001

Matt Thornblad US 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington DC United Technologies Corporation 20004

Yoolanda Williams US AP2-121, Appliance Park Louisville KY General Electric 40225

Dave Winningham US 215 Metropolitan Drive West Columbia SC Allied Air Enterprises 29072

Bruce Womack US 1725 Venice Circle Stockton CA Brucesgreengardener.com 95206

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

Frank Xu US 1998 FM 2011 Longview TX National Coil Company 75603

General Information
No. 91-6168.

#### Davis *v.*Harris, Superintendent, Greene Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the
Company) dated March 14, 2003 containing the
audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Dennis J. Pauls, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted, certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
|  
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | By: /s/ DENNIS J. PAULS
| |                        
| | Dennis J. Pauls        
| | Chief Financial Officer

March 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 3461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01283]



[[Page 3459]]

Vol. 80

Thursday,

No. 14

January 22, 2015

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of January 21, 2015--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace 
Process


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 80 , No. 14 / Thursday, January 22, 2015 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 3461]]

                Notice of January 21, 2015

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the 
                Middle East Peace Process

                On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security, foreign policy, and 
                economy of the United States constituted by grave acts 
                of violence committed by foreign terrorists that 
                disrupt the Middle East peace process. On August 20, 
                1998, by Executive Order 13099, the President modified 
                the Annex to Executive Order 12947 to identify four 
                additional persons who threaten to disrupt the Middle 
                East peace process. On February 16, 2005, by Executive 
                Order 13372, the President clarified the steps taken in 
                Executive Order 12947.

                These terrorist activities continue to threaten the 
                Middle East peace process and to pose an unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 
                policy, and economy of the United States. For this 
                reason, the national emergency declared on January 23, 
                1995, and the measures adopted to deal with that 
                emergency must continue in effect beyond January 23, 
                2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of 
                the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency with 
                respect to foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt 
                the Middle East peace process.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    January 21, 2015.

[FR Doc. 2015-01283
Filed 1-21-15; 12:15 pm]
Billing code 3295-F5
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffGeneric  Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants  (NUREG-1437)

# Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station — Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 43)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1437, Supplement 43, Final Report (PDF 11.02 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2010**Date Published:**January 2011

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This final supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) has been prepared in response to an application submitted by Arizona Public Service Company (APS) to renew the operating license for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station for an additional 20 years.

This final SEIS includes the analysis that evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action. Alternatives considered include replacement power from new supercritical coal-fired generation; natural gas combined-cycle generation; new nuclear generation; a combination of alternatives that includes natural gas combined-cycle generation, energy conservation, and solar; and not renewing the license (the no-action alternative).

The recommendation is that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission determined that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for PVNGS are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy-planning decision makers would be unreasonable. This recommendation is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the GEIS; (2) the Environmental Report submitted by APS; (3) consultation with Federal, State, and local agencies; (4) the NRC staff’s own independent review; and (5) the NRC staff’s consideration of public comments received during the scoping process.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Suppression Pool Temperature Limits for BWR Containments (Generic Technical Activity A-39) (NUREG-0783)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-0783 (PDF - 3.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1981**Date Published:**November 1981

T. M. Su

Division of Safety Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Boiling water reactor (BWR) plants are equipped with safety/relief valves (SRVs) to protect the reactor from overpressurization. Plant operational transients, such as turbine trips, will actuate the SRV. Once the SRV opens, steam released from the reactor is discharged through SRV lines to the suppression pool in the primary containment. Steam is then condensed in the suppression pool in a stable condition. Extended steam blowdown into the pool, however, will heat the pool to a level where the condensation process may become unstable. This instability of steam condensation may cause severe vibratory loads on containment structures. Current practice in dealing with this phenomenon restricts the allowable operating temperature envelope of the pool in the Technical Specifications so that this instability will not occur. This restriction is referred to as the pool temperature limit. Task Action Plan (TAP) A-39, 11 Determination of Safety/Relief Valve (SRV) Pool Dynamic Loads and Temperature Limits for BWR Containment, 11 was established to resolve, among other things, the concern about steam condensation behavior for the Mark I, II, and III containments. This report presents the resolution of this issue and includes: (1) the acceptance criteria related to the suppression pool temperature limits; (2) events for which a suppression pool temperature response analysis is required; (3) assumptions used for the analysis; and (4) requirements for the suppression pool temperature monitoring system. This report completes the subtask related to the suppression pool temperature limit in TAP A-39.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021