alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Karl Schneider, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with a respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)           allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport information; and

 

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Dated:  May 14, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Karl  Schneider                 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Karl  Schneider                     |
|   | Senior Vice  President, Finance and |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer            |

 

1

----
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T08:39:49Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:39:50Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:39:50Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="14219">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T08:39:49Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION lo- 7463 WAS NEVER ISSUED OH 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Nickel-Base Alloys(NUREG/CR-7103)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HENRY FREDERICK KRIZANOVIC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-04-124)

Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: March 1, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Harry L.

Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Henry Frederick Krizanovic pled guilty to bank robbery

and was sentenced to forty-six months of imprisonment. On appeal,

counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), alleging that there are no meritorious claims on appeal but

raising the following issues: whether (1) the district court erred

by failing to grant a downward departure for diminished capacity

under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.13 (2004), p.s., and,

(2) the sentence was reasonable under United States v. Booker, 125

S. Ct. 738 (2005). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

First, a district court’s failure to grant a downward

departure is not reviewable unless a district court was under the

mistaken impression that it lacked the authority to depart. United

States v. Matthews, 209 F.3d 338, 352 (4th Cir. 2000). Here there

is no indication in the record that the district court

misunderstood its authority. Second, we find that Krizanovic’s

forty-six month sentence, imposed at the bottom of his properly

calculated Guideline range, and after the court considered the

factors in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005), was

reasonable. See United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th

Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Shannon, 414 F.3d 921, 924

(8th Cir. 2005) (stating that a “sentence imposed . . . consistent

with the now-advisory guidelines . . . is generally indicative of

reasonableness.”). 
- 3 -

We have examined the entire record in this case in

accordance with the requirements of Anders, and find no meritorious

issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires

that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to

petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review.

If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel

believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may

move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation.

Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the

client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") by Ames National Corporation (the "Company"), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 10th day of March, 2010.
  /s/ Thomas H. PohlmanThomas H. Pohlman, President(Principal Executive Officer)
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended & Restated Employment Agmt  - Moses Grader



 Exhibit 10.33 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT 
 AGREEMENT

 This Amendment is effective as of December 31, 2010 and extends and amends an Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement among the employee listed on the signature page attached hereto (“Employee”) and Aveon Management L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”) dated as of October 29, 2010 (the
“Employment Agreement”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Employment Agreement, if a “Capitalization Transaction” (as defined in the Employment Agreement) has not closed on or prior to December 31, 2010, then the
Employment Agreement is void and of no further force and effect; and 
 WHEREAS, in order to secure Employee’s further
services, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the period during which a Capitalization Transaction may occur before the Employment Agreement becomes void and of no further force or effect. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound
hereby, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1.    Effective December 31, 2010, Section IA.
of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace December 31, 2010, each place it occurs therein with “February 15, 2011”. 
 2.    The Company and Employee hereby reaffirm all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement not expressly amended herein and agree that such terms and conditions shall
otherwise remain in place. 
 3.    The Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the
entire agreement and understanding among the Company and Employee concerning the matters addressed by the Employment Agreement, and supersedes any and all previous agreements or understandings, whether written or oral, between or among the Company
and Employee concerning the same. The Company and Employee agree and acknowledge that there are no restrictions, promises, representations, warranties, covenants or undertakings, other than those expressly set forth or referred to herein or therein.

 4.    This Amendment is effective December 31, 2010. 

5.    This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be deemed one and the same
agreement and shall be deemed delivered by the Company and Employee when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the Company and Employee. 







 6.    This amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions or the conflict of laws provisions of any other jurisdiction which would cause the application of any law other than that of the State of Delaware. 

[signature page follows] 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has executed this Amendment as of December 31,
2010. 
  
  

					
	EMPLOYEE
		
	 /s/ Moses Grader
	 	
	Moses Grader
	
	AVEON MANAGEMENT L.L.C.
			
	By:	 	 /s/ John J. Hassett
	 	
		 	        Name: John J. Hassett
		 	        Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



  
 3
Unassociated Document


    AMENDMENT
TO DIVERSIFIED SECURE VENTURES CORP AND 

    MINERAL
RESOURCES AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING, INC 

    AGREEMENT
DATED APRIL 27, 2010.

     

    By mutual
consent, both parties agree to amend its April 27, 2010 agreement whereby Secure
Runway Systems (now legally named Diversified Secure Ventures Corp) was to
receive a thirty-five percent interest in MRTC (26,250,000 shares of MRTC common
stock) and its future acquisition of prospective mining properties in exchange
for the sum of $250,000.00USD and 500,000 shares of SRWY common stock. Terms
amended as follows:

    
      	
               
      

            	
              (a)

            	
              MRTC
      shall issue its common stock to Diversified Secure Ventures on a quarterly
      basis consistent with the dollar amount Diversified has invested into
      MRTC.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              (b)

            	
              Diversified
      shall be entitled to sell any portion of its authorized shares both issued
      and/or unissued to a third party entity for the purpose of increasing its
      investments in MRTC.

            


    

    
      	
               
      

            	
              (c)

            	
              MRTC
      grants Diversified the right of refuse any investment offer MRTC receives
      from an interested third party in respect to this
    agreement.

            


    

    The above
reflects the full text and content of this amendment.

     

    The
foregoing is agreed to by the following authorized parties effective this
29th
day of July, 2010.

    
      
        	 	 	 	 	 
	
                ``Edward
      Minnema``

              	 	 	
                



              	 
	
                Edward
      Minnema    July 29,
      2010  

              	 	 	
                Robert
      L. Hawkins    July 29,
      2010

              	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                 

              	 
	President/CEO   	 	 	President/CEO	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Diversified
      Secure Ventures  	 	 	Mineral
      Resources & Technical Consulting
I . 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eoonorable Geo. H, Sheppard $ e 

comptroller of Fublio accounts 

Austin, Texas 

war m. Sheppard: 

the 

Your requeskfor 

above sub jeot-matter is 

opinion conoerni.ng 

Control. The 

o approve the aourchase contract 

ues t by your o&ion 

ssed your opinion upon 

contention between the prison 

rd of Control. with reference 

the 

uired to approve thi’s account since 

contract was based primarily on the issue of 

installation antI not on the purchas.e of the artiale, 

WThe Prison System contends that sinoe the 

contract calls for the installation of the 

maohinery that the Board of Control would not 

.* 
Hon. Gee. H. Sheppard, page 2. 

be reqtired to ay,prove the estimates or vouchers before this department would be authorize& 

to issue warrants in payment thereof..* 

written 

Your request npbn which Opinion No. O-2595 ozas 

stated: 

to 

IlO 

We did, 

tion as 

*The Stat8 I?oard of Control has refused 

approve this aooount for the reason that 

purchase contraot was let by them.n 

. 

therefore, confine our snswer to the specifio quespresented. 

Cameron 

& examfnstion of the si&ed ccntract betzveen 

Can Gachlnery Company and the Texas prison System 

. _ . _ ._ _ shozs that the purchase of the machznery contemplated and 

required the installation of the same. If the contraot had 

been for installation alone, it might not come within the 

exqlusivo province of thr Board of Control under Article 

634 of the statutes, but the contraot as a whole is one for 

the purchase of machinery, such maohinery to bc duly installed, Since the contract embraces a purchase within the 

meaning of Article 634, Revised Civil Statutes, it was one 

which could not be let without tho approval of the Board of 

Control, the installation of such machinery being sn incident to the contract of purchase, but of course an integral 

part of the one and only oontraot entered into. Ihis form 

of oontroct for purchase obviously is the one favored by 

the Iexas prison System, for it was executed by the Cystem. 

From what vte have said, it follows that the contlYlOt Of FUXhEGU, although it carried with it an e.grecment 

for installation of the maohinery purchased, should have 

been made by the Board of Control instead of by the Texas 

Prison System. 

Since the purchase including the installment of 

the machinery as we have held, was exclusively the provinoe 

of the Board of Control and since said purchase presumably 

is one that should have been made upon competitive bids Fn 

aooordanoe with the statutes (Article 634, et seq.), the 

hoard of Control would have no power to impart validity to 

the seller’s claim by an approval of tho audit at this time. 

. . 
Eon*. Gee* H. Sheppard, page 3, 

por a full discussion of this question see our Opi’$on 

-ho. O-2612, a copy of which aoconpanies this reply.. 

The clain should not be passed f?r payment. 

Yours very truly 

mu" 

We sp k er 

Assistant
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1625 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     February 28, 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1625) entitled ``An Act to amend the State Department Basic Authorities 
Act of 1956 to include severe forms of trafficking in persons within 
the definition of transnational organized crime for purposes of the 
rewards program of the Department of State, and for other purposes.'', 
do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Targeted Rewards for the Global 
Eradication of Human Trafficking'' or the ``TARGET Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) Trafficking in persons is a major transnational crime, 
        as recognized by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 
        (22 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; division A of Public Law 106-386).
            (2) Trafficking in persons is increasingly perpetrated by 
        organized, sophisticated criminal enterprises.
            (3) Combating trafficking in persons requires a global 
        approach to identifying and apprehending the world's worst 
        human trafficking rings.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
Department of State's rewards program is a powerful tool in combating 
sophisticated international crime and that the Department of State and 
Federal law enforcement should work in concert to offer rewards that 
target human traffickers who prey on the most vulnerable people around 
the world.

SEC. 3. REWARDS FOR JUSTICE.

    Section 36(k)(5) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 
1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(k)(5)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``means'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses 
        (i) and (ii), respectively, and moving such clauses, as 
        redesignated, 2 ems to the right;
            (3) by inserting before clause (i), as redesignated, the 
        following:
                    ``(A) means--'';
            (4) in clause (ii), as redesignated, by striking the period 
        at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
            (5) by adding at the end following:
                    ``(B) includes severe forms of trafficking in 
                persons (as defined in section 103 of the Trafficking 
                Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102)) 
                involving at least 1 jurisdiction outside of the United 
                States.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1625

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of LONF ATWS for Mananshan PWR Using TRACE Code (NUREG/IA-0436)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0436 (PDF - 1.83 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2013**Date Published:** February 2014

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Che-Hao Chen*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd. Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, Taiwan

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science National Tsing Hua University 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd. HsinChu, Taiwan

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objective of this study is to utilize TRACE code to analyze the reactor coolant system (RCS) pressure transients under LONF (Loss of Normal Feedwater) ATWS (Anticipated Transient Without Scram) for Maanshan PWR. TRACE is an advanced thermal hydraulic code for nuclear power plant safety analysis which is developed by U.S. NRC. Maanshan nuclear power plant (NPP) is a Westinghouse three-loop PWR in Taiwan. The rated core thermal power of Maanshan with MUR-PU (Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate) is 2822 MWt. According to Westinghouse anticipated transients without trip report, LONF ATWS was regarded as the most severe plant condition. The ASME Code Level C service limit criteria of 22.06 MPa (3200 psig) was assumed to be an unacceptable plant condition in SECY-83-293.

In order to conform to 10 CFR 50.62, Maanshan NPP has set up AMSAC that is diverse from reactor trip system to automatically initiate the auxiliary feedwater system and initiate a turbine trip under conditions indicative of an ATWS. Since the ATWS analysis is not specified in the FSAR, we use TRACE code to assess the RCS pressure for Maanshan NPP. The results indicate that RCS pressure could keep within 22.06 MPa with sufficient negative moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) and normal work of AMSAC and valves.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Web-Based Public Access to ADAMS (NUREG/BR-0299)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0299 (PDF - 251 KB)  |  Spanish Translation (PDF - 27.1 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**November 2002

Public Document Room U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

**ADAMS** stands for the **A**gencywide **D**ocuments **A**ccess and **M**anagement **S**ystem. It is through ADAMS that the public obtains access to current, publicly available NRC documents. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has developed a Web-based search interface that allows access to ADAMS. Documents are now available at the NRC Web site using this new search interface through a link on the NRC Library page.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021