alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM 

TO: File 

FROM: George Faison 

SUBECT: Presentation to NESCAUM 

A presentation was made on May 13, 2010 to the Northeast States for Coordinated Air 

Use Management to provide an overview of the proposed rule Identification of NonHazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes. The presentation focused on the 

following topics: 

• Background and Purpose of the Rule 

• Overview of the January 2, 2009 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

• Proposed approaches in the proposed rulemaking 

• Next Steps
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Lecil E. Cole, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2018 (the “report”) of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 

|                      |                                |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Date:  April 1, 2019 | /s/  Lecil E. Cole        |
|                      | Lecil E. Cole                       |
|                      | Chairman of the Board of Directors, |
|                      | and Chief Executive Officer         |

 

----
#### Masiakowski, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Fons, Stoecker, Mietus & Fendryk*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *John E. Martin,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondents Schneider Fuel & Supply Company and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company: *Charles H. Gorman*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of the Turbine Trip Transient in Cofrentes NPP with TRAC–BF1 (NUREG/IA-0120, EST–SIAN–22)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0120 (PDF 1.49 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** June 1993

**Prepared by:** F. Castrillo/Hidroelectrica Espanola (H.E.) A. Gomez/Union Iberoamericana De Tecnologia (UITESA) I. Gallego/Union Iberoamericana De Tecnologia (UITESA)

Unidad Electrica, S.A. c/Francisco Gervas, 3 28020–Madrid, Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Foreword

This report has been prepared by Hidroeléctrica Española in the framework of the ICAP-UNESA Project.

The report represents one of the application calculations submitted in fulfilment of the bilateral agreement for cooperation in thermalhydraulic activities between the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear of Spain (CSN) and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) in the form of Spanish contribution to the International Code Assessment and Applications Program (ICAP) of the USNRC whose main purpose is the validation of the TRAC and RELAP system codes.

The Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear has promoted a coordinated Spanish Nuclear Industry effort (ICAP-SPAIN) aiming to satisfy the requirements of this agreement and to improve the quality of the technical support groups at the Spanish Utilities, Spanish Research Establishments, Regulatory Staff and Engineering Companies, for safety purposes.

This ICAP-SPAIN national program includes agreements between CSN and each of the following organizations: 
>  - Unidad Eléctrica (UNESA) - Unión Iberoamericana de Tecnología Eléctrica (UITESA) - Empresa Nacional del Uranio (ENUSA) - TECNATOM - Empresarios Agrupados - LOFT-ESPAÑA

The program is executed by 12 working groups and a generic code review group and is coordinated by the "Comité de Coordinación". This committee has approved the distribution of this document for ICAP purposes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### John R. BYRNE, Jr., Appellant, v. Robert H. SAUER and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation.

No. 14903.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 19, 1965.

Decided April 28, 1965.

Sanford S. Finder, Washington, Pa., for appellant.

Richard T. Wentley, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appel-lee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find that the court’s charge, taking it in context, contains no substantial error. The trial transcript justifies the reference by defense counsel in his summation to plaintiff’s chiropractic treatments. There is evidence in the record to support the verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee. «

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11

                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                 (In thousands, except share and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended April 30,
                                                                 1996           1997
                                                                 ----           ----
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>         
Net income for primary income per common share               $       256    $      (745)
                                                             ===========    ===========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    during the year                                            2,126,532      2,814,992

Add common equivalent shares (determined using the
    treasury stock method) representing shares issuable
    upon exercise of incentive stock options and warrants         88,402        503,060
                                                             -----------    -----------

Weighted average number of shares used in calculation
    of primary earnings per share                              2,214,934      3,318,052
                                                             ===========    ===========

Primary earnings per share                                           .12           (.22)
                                                             ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
Opinion issued August 2 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 1 9 - 0 0 4 5 7 - CV

——————————— KAWTHER KATEE B , Appellant

V. SUGARLAND /FORT BEND REAL ESTA TE, INC. D/B/A RE/MA X SOUTHWEST INC., HPW INVESTMENTS, INC., A IDA YOUNIS SAMAD

AND IQBAL IKE SAMAD , Appellee s

O n Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17 - DCV - 243453

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appell ees , Sugarland /Fort Bend Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a RE/MAX Southwest Inc., HPW Investments, Inc., Aida Younis Samad and Iqbal Ike Samad, filed a joint letter

- motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that all parties have reached a settlement2

as to all claims and that appellant wishes to dismiss her appeal

. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). Although appell ee s ’ joint letter

- motion does not contain a certificate of conference and ten days has not yet passed, w e c on c l u d e th a t g oo d c a u s e e x i s t s t o

s us p e n d t h e normal o p era ti on of Rule s 10.1 and 10.3 and construe appell ees ’ letter

motion as an unopposed appellant’s motion to dismiss

. S e e T EX . R. A PP . P. 2, 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1)

. N o other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant appellant’s m otion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley

.
No. 91-671.

#### Sanders et al. *v.*City of Brady, Texas.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00499-CR

Rudy Gutierrez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-5235-07-D(2)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 31, 2019
HomeNRC LibraryDocument Collections

# News Releases

Information released to the press and other media

***To stay informed of news releases, Subscribe to Email Updates or RSS Feeds.***

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 05, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes
          - Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials
          - Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
          - Agreement State Action Items
          - Agreement State Communications
          - ASLBP
          - Commission Documents
          - Congressional Documents
          - Electronic Government (E-Gov) Documents
          - Enforcement Documents
          - Enforcement Petition (2.206)
          - Events, Reports Associated with
          - Fact Sheets & Brochures
          - Federal Register Notices (NRC)
          - Forms (NRC)
          - For the Record
          - Generic Communications
          - Generic Issues
          - Government Information Locator Service (GILS)
          - Human Factors Information System
          - Inspection Manual
          - OIG Reports
          - IMPEP Reviews of NRC Programs
          - Interim Staff Guidance
          - Management Directives
          - Memoranda of Understanding
          - News Releases
          - NMSS Procedures
          - NRC Datasets
          - NRC Infographics
          - NRC Maps
          - NUREG-Series Publications
          - OMB Exhibit 300s
          - Personal Identity Verification
          - Previous Site Additions
          - Regulations (NRC, 10 CFR)
          - Regulatory Guides (by Division)
          - Research Information Letters
          - Rulemaking Documents
          - Technical Letter Reports

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, January 05, 2024
No. 91-6359.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 99.12

CONSENT OF EXPERT

August 26, 2011

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: International Tower Hill Mines Ltd.

I,
Russell Myers, CPG, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure
regarding the technical report entitled August 2011 Summary Report on the
Livengood Project, Tolovana District, Alaska dated August 25, 2011 in the Form
40-F Annual Report, and any amendments thereto, and the Annual Information Form
of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. (the Company) dated August 26, 2011.

I also
consent to the use of my name in the Companys Form 40-F Annual Report, and any
amendments thereto, and Annual Information Form dated August 26, 2011.

| | By: | /s/ Russell Myers 
| | --- | ------------------
| |     | Russell Myers, CPG
| |     | President         
| |     | Corvus Gold
  Inc.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7175** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DONALD ELBERT LEWIS, a/k/a Peptone , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 4:12

- cr - 00068

- FL

- 2; 4:13

- cv - 00182

- FL )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donald Elbert Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Augustus D. Willis, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Elbert Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and denying his motion for reconsid eration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling i s debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lewis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

a c ertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Lewis’ motions to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) and for a mental and emotional evaluation. We dispense3 with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 99

Midwest Generation, LLCOne Financial Place,
440 South La Salle Street, Suite 3500
Chicago, Illinois 60605

March 25,
2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

This
will confirm that Midwest Generation, LLC (the "Company") has received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") with respect to Arthur Andersen's audit of the Company's
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001. Arthur Andersen's letter certifies that the audit was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, and that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel
working on the audit, availability of national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very
truly yours,

|/s/ Kevin M. SmithKevin M. Smith Manager, Vice President and Treasurer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Uncertainties in Predicted Isotopic Compositions for High Burnup PWR Spent Nuclear Fuel (NUREG/CR-7012, ORNL/TM-2010/41)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7012 (PDF - 22.22 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2010**Date Published:** January 2011

**Prepared by:** I.C. Gauld, G. Ilas, and G. Radulescu

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

 NRC Job Code N6540

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Experimental isotopic assay data for 51 spent fuel samples acquired from domestic and international programs have been compiled to provide a database to validate computational predictions of spent fuel isotopic compositions important to criticality safety (burnup credit), reactor physics, spent fuel storage and transportation, and waste management applications. The data were selected on the basis that they include extensive actinide and fission product isotopic assay measurements. The experimental data were acquired for fuels irradiated in six different pressurized water reactors: the Three Mile Island 1 and Calvert Cliffs 1 reactors operated in the United States, the Takahama-3 reactor in Japan, the Gösgen reactor in Switzerland, the GKN II reactor in Germany, and the Vandellós II reactor in Spain. The fuel samples cover enrichments from 2.6 to 4.7 wt % 235U, and a wide burnup range, from 9 to 78 GWd/MTU. In this report, spent fuel isotopic compositions calculated using two-dimensional isotope depletion models and ENDF/B-V–based cross section libraries in the SCALE 5 code system are benchmarked against the experimental isotopic data to validate the code and nuclear data libraries and provide estimates of isotopic bias and uncertainty for nuclides of highest importance to safety and licensing applications. The procedures used to evaluate the experimental data and assess the results are described.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. PF15-1-000]
 On January 13, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued a 
                    *Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned PennEast Pipeline Project, Requests for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings.*
                     The notice solicited comments on the potential environmental impacts of the planned project and announced the time and location of five public scoping meetings being held for the environmental proceeding. The close of the public comment period in that notice is listed as February 12, 2015. Due to a limited printing delay in the mailing of the notice, we are extending the comment period. Please note that the scoping period will now close on February 27, 2015. In addition to extending the scoping period, the Commission staff has provided further clarification on its scoping meeting locations. The table below now lists the name of the building or hall at each meeting location. Please note that signage will be placed upon the entry of the meeting venues for your assistance. Date and time
LocationJanuary 27, 2015, 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time
College of New Jersey, Kendall Hall, Performance Theater, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, NJ 08628.January 28, 2015, 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Bucks County Community College, Kevin and Sima Zlock Performing Arts Center, Gateway Auditorium, 275 Swamp Road, Newtown, PA 18940.February 10, 2015, 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Northampton Community College, Main Campus, Kopecek Hall, Lipkin Theater, 3835 Green Pond Rd, Bethlehem, PA 18020.February 11, 2015, 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Penn's Peak, Main Concert Hall, 325 Maury Road, Jim Thorpe, PA 18229.February 12, 2015, 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Best Western Hotel & Conference Center, Empress Ballroom, 77 E Market Street, Wilkes-Barre, PA.
 Dated: January 21, 2015. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2015-01475 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Field Investigations for Foundations of Nuclear Power Facilities (NUREG/CR-5738)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5738 (PDF - 8.64 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 1999**Date Published:** November 1999

**Prepared by:** N. Torres, J. P. Koester, J. L. Llopis

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199

E. G. Zurflueh, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6453

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document provides a technical basis for revision of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.132, Site Investigations for Foundations of Nuclear Power Facilities, reflecting current and state-of-the-art techniques related to field site investigations. The report summarizes the processes of acquiring geological, geophysical, geotechnical, and other kinds of relevant information that may affect the construction or performance of a building or other engineered structure at selected sites. Guidance is presented for in situ site studies during the various stages of site characterization. Topics range from initial information gathering, literature review, and site reconnaissance investigations, to on-site testing and the collection and management of samples for laboratory testing. Specific laboratory tests and techniques for the engineering analyses of soils and specific requirements for liquefaction analysis are not addressed in this document but are covered in companion technical basis documents.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hittite Microwave Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William W. Boecke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my
best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated: February 27, 2009

/s/ WILLIAM W. BOECKE William W. Boecke Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hittite Microwave Corporation and will be retained by Hittite Microwave Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks