[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4911-4912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (Supplement 2) for the Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the 
Gulf of Mexico, Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana, New 
Industrial Canal Lock and Connecting Channels Project, New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), New Orleans District 
intends to prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS), integrated with a General Reevaluation Report, for the 
Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico Mississippi River-
Gulf Outlet, Louisiana New Industrial Canal Lock and Connecting 
Channels Project, hereinafter referred to as ``the Project''. This 
project is sometimes referred to as the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal 
(IHNC) Lock Replacement Project. This will be the second supplemental 
EIS prepared for this project.

DATES: A public scoping meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 4, 
2015. An open house will be held at 6:00 p.m. followed by the scoping 
meeting at 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting will be held at Dr. Martin Luther King 
Jr. Charter School for Science and Technology, 1617 Caffin Avenue, New 
Orleans, LA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the Project and the 
supplemental EIS should be addressed to: Mr. Richard Boe or Mr. Mark 
Lahare, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Compliance Branch, 
P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA 70160-0267, by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c89aa1aba0a9baace6ade6aaa7ad88bdbba9abade6a9baa5b1e6a5a1a4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14467d777c7566703a713a767b715461677577713a7566796d3a797d78">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88c5e9fae3a6e0a6e4e9e0e9faedc8fdfbe9ebeda6e9fae5f1a6e5e1e4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8b5998a93d690d6949990998a9db88d8b999b9dd6998a9581d6959194">[email protected]</span></a>, or by 
telephone at (504) 862-1505 or (504) 862-1344.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. Project Background and Authorization. The existing Industrial 
Canal Lock, hereinafter referred to as the ``existing lock'', located 
in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, connects the Mississippi River to Lake 
Pontchartrain, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), and the remaining 
authorized six miles of the Mississippi River--Gulf Outlet (MRGO) 
between the Industrial Canal and the Michoud Slip. The existing lock, 
located between the St. Claude and Claiborne Avenue (Judge Seeber) 
Bridges in New Orleans, was commissioned and constructed by non-federal 
interests in 1923 to allow vessel traffic from the Mississippi River to 
Lake Pontchartrain and to permit industrial development away from the 
river. The federal government purchased the existing lock at a later 
date.
    The Project was authorized by an act of Congress entitled ``AN ACT 
to authorize construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet [sic]'', 
approved on March 29, 1956, as Chapter 112 of Public Law 455, of the 
84th Congress as an amendment to the existing Mississippi River, Baton 
Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico to provide for the construction of the 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet substantially in accordance with the 
report and recommendation of the Chief of Engineers in House Document 
No. 245 of the 82nd Congress, and to authorize the Chief of Engineers, 
when economically justified by the obsolescence of the existing 
industrial canal lock or by increased traffic, to replace the existing 
lock or an additional lock in the vicinity of Meraux, Louisiana, 
together with suitable connecting channels, said replacement lock and 
connecting channels to be constructed in accordance with the type, 
dimensions, and cost estimates approved by the Chief of Engineers. The 
1956 authorization was later amended by Section 844 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, and Section 326 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Public Law 104-303.
    The original EIS and project evaluation report for the Project was 
finalized in March 1998. A Record of Decision was signed on December 
18, 1998, selecting a construction method and location for a 
replacement lock north of the Claiborne Avenue Bridge, replacement of 
the St. Claude Avenue Bridge, modification of the Claiborne Avenue 
Bridge, extension of the Mississippi River flood protection levees and 
floodwalls, a community impact mitigation plan, and a fish and wildlife 
mitigation plan.
    In 2003, the Corps' decision to construct a new lock was challenged 
in United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (Case 
No. 2:03-cv-00370). In October 2006, the Court enjoined the Corps from 
continuing with the Project until additional compliance with the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was completed.
    In accordance with the provisions of Section 7013 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007, Public Law 110-114, that portion of 
the MRGO from Mile 60 on the southern bank of the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway to the Gulf of Mexico was deauthorized effective upon the June 
5, 2008 submittal by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) 
to Congress of the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 29, 
2008 recommending partial deauthorization of the MRGO. In July 2009, in 
accordance with the 2008 MRGO Chief's Report, the Corps completed 
construction of a rock closure structure on the MRGO at Bayou LaLoutre. 
Aids to navigation have been removed.
    In 2007, the Corps initiated preparation of a Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Project to address 
changes in the existing conditions after Hurricane Katrina, further 
analyze anticipated impacts associated with construction of the new 
lock and determine if any significant changes to the previously-
recommended plan were necessary. The final SEIS considered three deep-
draft lock alternatives and the no-action alternative (i.e., continued 
operation and maintenance of the existing lock), two dredging 
alternatives for the excavation that would be necessary for the 
construction of a new deep-draft lock, and three disposal alternatives 
for the dredged sediment. On May 20, 2009, a Record of Decision was 
signed,

[[Page 4912]]

recommending the float-in-place plan for construction of the lock, the 
hydraulic dredging method for excavation of sediment from the canal, 
and a dredged material disposal plan that included three locations for 
disposal of excavated sediments.
    In 2010, the Corps' decision to construct a new lock was again 
challenged in United States District Court, Eastern District of 
Louisiana in a case that was subsequently consolidated with the 2003 
case. On September 9, 2011, the Court found that the 2009 SEIS failed 
to sufficiently consider the impact of the closure of the MRGO to deep-
draft traffic and the effect of that closure on the depth of the new 
lock and potentially how that depth may affect dredging and disposal 
alternatives for the Project.
    2. Proposed Action. The purpose of the General Reevaluation Report 
and SEIS is to determine if construction of a more efficient 
navigational lock to replace the existing lock is economically 
justified and environmentally acceptable. The need for the Project 
arises from long navigation delays in passage through the Industrial 
Canal due to an increase in volume of vessel traffic and the small size 
and inefficiencies of the current lock. This supplemental EIS will 
evaluate (and/or reevaluate, as appropriate) existing conditions, 
alternative lock designs, and provide environmental analysis of 
anticipated project impacts associated with lock construction, dredging 
and disposal alternatives. The analyses associated with the handling of 
dredged material generated during project construction, the engineering 
design of confined disposal areas, and several other aspects of the 
Project, evaluated in the original 1998 EIS and the 2009 SEIS, will 
also be updated as appropriate.
    3. Alternatives. An evaluation of alternatives, including a no 
action alternative will be included. In this supplemental EIS, the no 
action alternative will be the continued operation and maintenance of 
the existing lock. Other alternatives will be determined through 
scoping, but are anticipated to include shallow-draft versus deep-draft 
lock alternatives. Previous evaluations of alternative dredging 
methods, dredged material handling and disposal alternatives, and 
construction of the lock by a cast-in-place method versus a float-in 
construction method evaluated in the 1998 EIS and 2009 SEIS will also 
be updated and/or re-evaluated as appropriate.
    4. Scoping. The Council on Environmental Quality regulations at 40 
CFR 1501.7 require an early and open process for determining the scope 
of an EIS and for identifying significant issues related to the 
proposed action. The public will be involved in the scoping and 
evaluation process through advertisements, notices, and other means. 
Federal, state and local agencies, and other interested groups will 
also be involved. Meetings to address discrete issues or parts or 
functions of the Project may be held. All parties are invited to 
participate in the scoping process by identifying any additional 
concerns on issues, studies needed, alternatives, procedures, and other 
matters related to the scope of this supplemental EIS.
    A. The Corps will provide additional notification of the public 
scoping meeting time and location through newspaper advertisements and 
other means (see DATES). Following a short presentation, verbal and 
written comments on the scope of this supplemental EIS will be 
accepted. A transcript of verbal comments will be generated to ensure 
accuracy.
    B. Issues. Issues identified for the Project include, but are not 
limited to the level of existing and forecasted vessel traffic through 
the existing lock, changes in socio-economics (i.e., property values, 
population, land use, public/community facilities and services) since 
the 2009 SEIS, evaluation of direct and indirect social and cultural 
impacts of the Project on certain Congressionally identified affected 
communities and the appropriate and practicable mitigation measures to 
address those impacts, lock construction methods (i.e., cast-in-place 
versus float-in), lock depth, and re-evaluation of reasonable dredging 
and disposal alternatives and associated impacts. This list is 
preliminary and is intended to facilitate public comment on the scope 
of the SEIS. Concurrent with the NEPA process, the Corps will ensure 
that compliance will be achieved and/or maintained with all applicable 
environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders governing issues 
such as Federally-listed threatened and endangered species, essential 
fish habitats, health and safety, general environmental concerns, 
wetlands and other aquatic resources, historic properties, fish and 
wildlife values, flood hazards, navigation, recreation, water quality, 
and environmental justice. In making its decision, the Corps will 
consider, in general, the needs and welfare of the community, the 
effect of the closure of the MRGO on existing conditions and the 
alternatives under evaluation, and other issues identified through 
scoping, public involvement, stakeholder views, and interagency 
coordination. The Corps expects to better define the issues of concern 
and define the methods that will be used to evaluate those issues 
through the scoping process.
    C. Environmental Review and Consultation. The proposed action will 
involve an evaluation for compliance with all applicable guidelines 
pursuant to section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. This review will 
involve a detailed reevaluation of all practicable alternatives to the 
handling and disposal of the dredged material generated from the 
Project. The Corps will provide extensive information on the resources 
to be impacted, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Although the 
Corps does not plan to invite any Federal agencies to be cooperating 
agencies, we expect to receive input and critical information from the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service and other Federal, state, and local agencies.
    5. Public Scoping Meeting Special Accommodations. The public 
scoping meeting place is physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Mark Lahare, (504) 862-1344 
(voice), or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#175a76657c397f397b767f7665725762647674723976657a6e397a7e7b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="024f6370692c6a2c6e636a6370674277716361672c63706f7b2c6f6b6e">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 5 business 
days prior to the meeting date.
    6. Estimated Date of Availability. It is estimated that this draft 
supplemental EIS will be available to the public in June 2016. At least 
one public hearing will be held at that time, during which the public 
will be provided the opportunity to comment on the draft supplemental 
EIS before it becomes final.

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Richard L. Hansen,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander.
[FR Doc. 2015-01674 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>