alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

THIS
  AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made as of the 1st day of October,
  2003.

BETWEEN:

Albert Friesen, 
  (hereinafter called the "Consultant"),

OF THE FIRST PART,

A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd., 
  (hereinafter called "Enterprises"),

OF THE SECOND PART.

- and -

Medicure Inc., 
  (hereinafter called the "Corporation"),

OF THE THIRD PART.

WHEREAS
  the Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation have entered into a Consulting
  Services Agreement (the "Consulting Agreement") made as of the 1st
  day of October, 2001;

NOW
  THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH that for the sum of $1.00 and other
  good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
  acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation
  covenant and agree with each other as follows:

1. All
  parties to the Consulting Agreement namely the Consultant, Enterprises and the
  Corporation agree to amend section 4 of the Consulting Agreement such that,
  effective October 1, 2003, the Corporation shall pay to Enterprises a fee of
  $14,583.33 per month plus applicable goods and services tax for services provided
  by the Consultant. The Consultant shall also be eligible to receive a performance
  bonus of up to 30 percent of his annual salary. This agreement is subject to
  a two-year term ending on September 30, 2005.

---

2. Other
  than as amended herein all other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement
  continue in full force and effect.

3. This
  Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding on the parties
  hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

4. This
  Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Manitoba.

5. The
  preamble hereto forms an integral part of this Agreement.

6. This
  Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and all such counterparts
  shall for all purposes constitute one instrument binding on the parties hereto
  even though all the parties are not signatories to the same counterpart.

IN
  WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the Consultant, Enterprises
  and the Corporation as of the day and the year first above written.



**Albert Friesen**



Per: "Albert D. Friesen"

A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.



Per: "Albert D. Friesen"

Medicure Inc.

Per: "Derek G. Reimer"




---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1821 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the standard 

charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals to elderly, disabled, frail, 

and at-risk individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. BARTON (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the standard charitable mileage rate for delivery of meals 

to elderly, disabled, frail, and at-risk individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Delivering Elderly 

5 Lunches and Increasing Volunteer Engagement and Reim6 bursements Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘DELIVER Act of 

7 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1821 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR DE2 LIVERY OF MEALS TO ELDERLY, DISABLED, 

3 FRAIL, AND AT-RISK INDIVIDUALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: ‘‘In the case of use of such an 

7 automobile for the delivery of meals to homebound individ8 uals who are elderly, disabled, frail, or at risk, the mileage 

9 rate used shall be the standard business mileage rate spec10 ified by the Internal Revenue Service for the taxable year 

11 in which such miles are driven.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply to miles driven on or after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1547 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Udall Park Land Exchange Completion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Tucson, 
        Arizona.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 172.8-acre parcel of City land identified in 
        the patent numbered 02-90-0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and 
        more particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S\1/2\NW\1/4\, 
        sec. 5, T.14S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN LAND LOCATED IN 
              TUCSON, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, the 
reversionary interests of the United States in and to the non-Federal 
land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land 
to enable economic development of the non-Federal land.
    (b) Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the exact legal descriptions of the non-Federal 
land shall be determined in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions to the conveyance under subsection 
(a), consistent with that subsection, as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Costs.--The City shall pay all costs associated with the 
conveyance under subsection (a), consistent with that subsection, 
including the costs of any surveys, recording costs, and other 
reasonable costs.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.
```
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 115 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Oconee 2 Docket (050- 00270)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 173 - Physical conditions LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

218

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content G - Engineering G - Design 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA G - Engineering G - Design 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making G - Design 

G - Engineering

197 - Self-check LTA M - Mechanical T - Testing 

764

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 11
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# The Individual Development Plan (IDP) Process: An Employee’s Guide for Individual Development Career Planning (NUREG/BR-0086, Revision 5)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document 
        - NUREG/BR-0086, Revision 5 (PDF - 2.73 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** October 2008

Human Resources Training & Development U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

The NRC Training and Development Strategic Plan lists as its first goal:
> 
*'Individual Performance — Ensure that training and development opportunities enhance individual performance and support continuous learning at all levels.'*

It also identifies the following as one strategy for reaching that goal:
> 
*'Encourage the use of individual development plans (IDPs) to guide individual training and development activities.'*

The IDP Guide supports both this goal and strategy by providing information to both employees and their supervisors on the importance of the Individual Development Plan process to employee career growth, development and performance as well as long-term agency effectiveness. It also provides step-by-step instructions on how to prepare an IDP as well as additional resources, tools and tips designed to ensure the development of a meaningful IDP; one that supports an employee’s career goals and aspirations as well as the agency’s mission.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
CONCLUSION As set forth herein, BRIAN MORSON seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 § 11.61 and Section 333 ofthe FAAModernization and Reform Act of2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation ofthe DJI PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography over certain areas ofthe United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate oftheFAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, while also advancing the interests ofthe public, by allowing BRIAN MORSON to safely, efficiently, and economically operate theDJI PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL and DJ UASs commercially within theNAS. WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, Section 333, BRIAN MORSON respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.15l(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permitLeading Edge to operate the DJI PHANTOM 3, PROFESSIONAL UAS commerciallyfor the purpose ofconducting aerial video and photography over certain areas ofthe United States. Dated: July 27, 2015

Page 34 of35Respectfully submitted, BRIANMORSON
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 FORM 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,812
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,001
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,810
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,672
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,130
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,130
<LOANS>                                         68,924
<ALLOWANCE>                                        440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,390
<DEPOSITS>                                      75,785
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                764
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,082
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              145
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 102,390
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,987
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  728
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,714
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,706
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,162
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,553
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       56
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    590
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         368
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.31
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       463
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   388
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  444
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               444
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shant S. Hovnanian,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
  The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and(2)
  The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
  August 15,
  2005By:
  /s/ Shant S.
  HovnanianName:
  Shant S.
  HovnanianTitle:
  Chairman of
  the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 20
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 of
AMERALINK, INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# Note to Editors: Public Comment on Sunshine Act Rule

----

----

No. 99-97 May 12, 1999

**NOTE TO EDITORS: PUBLIC COMMENT ON SUNSHINE ACT RULE**

**(NOTE DATE CORRECTION)**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published and issued for comment its intent to implement a regulation that allows certain meetings of three or more of the five Commissioners to be held in private.

The rule -- which implements the Government in the Sunshine Act -- was first issued and made effective in 1985. The NRC is providing an opportunity at this time for public comment on its intent to implement the rule because of the time that has passed since the Commission last addressed this issue.

Comments should be submitted by June 9. Unless the Commission takes further action, the private meetings may be held beginning July 1 (erroneously reported as June 1 in the May 10 edition of the Federal Register, which has more details about this matter. A revised Federal Register notice is expected to be published shortly).

NRC issued a press release on this subject March 1.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No: 19-016 March 18, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Announces Hearing Opportunity on Proposed License Amendment

to the Church Rock Mill Site in New Mexico

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request an 

adjudicatory hearing on United Nuclear Corp.’s proposal to move mine waste onto the Church Rock 

mill site in northwestern New Mexico.

The hearing opportunity was announced in a Federal Register notice published March 13. 

The notice provides detailed instructions on how to file a request, including requirements for 

demonstrating standing and submitting specific contentions admissible in a hearing. Hearing 

requests are due by May 13. 

United Nuclear, a subsidiary of General Electric, is seeking an amendment to its NRC 

license that would authorize the transfer of approximately 1 million cubic yards of contaminated 

soil, known as “mine spoils,” from the North East Church Rock mine to the nearby Church Rock 

uranium mill site for disposal at the mill’s waste facility, called a “tailings impoundment.” The mill 

is located about 17 miles northeast of Church Rock, N.M., adjacent to the Navajo Reservation.

In a Federal Register notice published Feb. 8, the NRC announced its intention to prepare an 

environmental impact statement on the proposed transfer. The agency staff is seeking public 

comments to help define the scope of the environmental review. The Federal Register notice 

provides detailed instructions for submitting comments, which will be accepted through April 19. 

The Church Rock uranium mill operated from 1977 to 1982, processing uranium ore from 

the Northeast Church Rock Mine under a state of New Mexico license. Since 1988, the mill has 

been under dual regulatory oversight of the NRC and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

under a Memorandum of Understanding between the two agencies. The NRC is the lead agency 

regulating surface reclamation and closure activities at the site under an NRC license and the

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. The EPA is the lead agency regulating 

cleanup of the mine.

UNC’s proposal to dispose of the mine spoils at the mill site is part of a broader cleanup 

action by the EPA under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 

process. Stakeholders involved in this action include the NRC, EPA, the Navajo Nation 

Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Energy and the New Mexico 

Environment Department.