alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the “Company”) and I, David M. Sankaran,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Mark J. Emkjer                     |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Mark J. Emkjer                         |
|   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/David M. Sankaran                   |   |
|   | David M. Sankaran                      |
|   | Senior Vice President                  |
|   | and Chief Financial  Officer           |
|   |                                   |
|   |                                   |
|   | August 4, 2005                         |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff Issues Order to Former Farley Nuclear Plant Employee ProhibitingInvolvement in NRC-Licensed Activities

----

----

No: II-98-14

February 24, 1998

**NRC STAFF ISSUES ORDER TO FORMER FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEE PROHIBITING INVOLVEMENT IN NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an Order to a former employee at Southern Nuclear Operating Company's Farley nuclear power plant which prohibits involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a three-year period and requires notification to the NRC of the person's first involvement in NRC-licensed activities for an additional year after the prohibition expires. The order is effective immediately.

NRC officials sent notification to Julian H. McGriff on February 23, informing him of the action. The agency issued the order because McGriff deliberately falsified inventories of emergency equipment from April 1996 to January 1997. An audit by the plant staff and a subsequent NRC investigation found that on a number of occasions, McGriff's entries on the inventory checklist documentation did not match plant access data.

McGriff was terminated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company in March 1997 and his three-year prohibition began at that time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gordon Quick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Daleen Technologies,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ GORDON QUICK  
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having
been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
# o

U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n 

# Memorandu m

Subject : ACTION : Docke t

OST-2011-0159 : Exemptio n fromth e Tarif

f Filin g Requirement s Date : Octobe r 14 , 201 1

From : To : Pau l L . Gretc h Director , Offic e o f

Internationa l Aviation , X-4 0 Rene e Wrigh t ProgramManager , Docket s Managemen t Repl y t o Deli aE . Davi s Attn , of : ^202 ) 366-243 2

Pleas e issu e an dclose . Attachmen t

C J Z' O -v ^ -''— , O -^> '" n u o

# e

U L & Departmen t o f - IQ^Of ) lAJlO' ^ 120 0 Ne w Jerse

yAvenue , S

E TVamportatio n .-. ; • • T OFl^ R •\l'!G"-^i3^^^'''S'^" ' ^ ^059 0 Of f ic e o f th e Secrelor y o f Transportatio n . _. r, . i o Octobe r 14 , 201 1 Mr . MoffettB . Rolle r Rolle r & Bauer , PLL C Washingto n Dulle s Internationa l Airport 4500 5 Aviatio n Driv e Suit e 20 0 Dulles , V A 2016 6 Dea r Mr . Roller : Thi s lette r

confirm s th e Octobe r

13 , 201 1 ora l approva l o f you r applicatio n for

a30-da y exemptio n fro mprovision s o f 4 9 U.S.C . 4150 4 an dPart 22 1 o f th e Department' s Regulations , t o th e exten t necessary t o permi t

AB C Aerolineas , S.A . d e C.V . d/b/ aInterjet , t o advertis e an dsel l ai r transportatio n o n it s authorize dservic e betwee n Mexic o an dth e Unite dState s withou t benefi t o f afile dtariff

. B y Orde r

2008-10-30 , effectiv e Octobe r 29 , 2008 , th e Departmen t grante d Interje t aforeig n ai r

carrie r permi t tha t authorize dInterje t

t o operat e schedule dservic e betwee n Toluca , Mexico , an dSan Antonio , Texas ; an db y Notic e o f Actio n Take n o n Augus t 31 , 2011 , th e Departmen t

grante dInterje t

an exemptio n t o engag e i n schedule dforeig n service s betwee n Mexic o City , Mexico , o n th e on e han dan dSa n Antonia , Texas ; New York , Ne w York ; an d Miami , Florida , o n th e othe r han di n Docke t

OST-2011-0159 . Interje t ha s indicate dthat

the y ar e currentl y workui g with th e Airlin e Tarif f Publishin g Compan y t o prepar e Interjet' s genera l rule s an dfare s tariff , an dhope s tha t

th e tarif f can b e file dan d approve dwithi n 3 0 days . W e fin dth e reason s state di n you r applicatio n generall y conformwith th e criteri aw e hav e previousl y foun dnecessary t o approv e thi s typ e o f authorization , an dthat

approval i s consisten t withth e publi c interest . W e wil l gran t exemptio n fromth e tarif f filin g requiremen t

throug h Novembe r

13,2011 , o r

unti l suc h tim e a s tariff

s ar e approve db y th e Department , whicheve r occur s first . Thi s actio n i s take n unde r authority dul y assigne db y th e Department' s Regulation , 1 4 CF R385.13 . Person s entitle dt o petitio n for revie w o f

thi s actio n unde r

th e Department' s Regulations , 1 4 CF R385.30 , may fil e apetitio n withu i seve n day s afte r th e dat e o f

thi s letter .Thi s actio n i s effectiv e immediately , an dth e filin g o f apetitio n for

revie w shal l no t

alter it s effectiveness . Sincerely , ^y^^Pau l L . Gretc h y ' Durector Offic e o f Internationa l Aviatio n
#### JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, (Debtor in Possession, Bankruptcy Chapter XI), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Captain A. J. Gildea, U. S. Navy, Commander, Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80-5622.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 9, 1982.

Decided Oct. 20, 1982.

Roy G. Weatherup, Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel, Santa Monica, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard A. Olderman, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Johns-Manville Sales Corporation1 (hereafter “Johns-Manville”) attempted to sue the United States in District Court for the Central District of California, to obtain a determination, at this time, that it is entitled to indemnification under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq.) for any judgments that may eventually become final against it, in certain state court actions brought by plaintiffs, not parties to this action, who assert that they have suffered damages from exposure to asbestos. One claim of the complaint also seeks man*722damus to require compliance with certain safety standards at the Naval Shipyard at Long Beach, California, for which there must be some underlying independent jurisdiction.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of all claims of the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Federal Tort Claims Act is an historic departure from the rule of sovereign immunity and the administrative claims procedures, specified in that Act, have not been exhausted in this case. Appellant has sued the United States directly; these are not claims asserted by third party complaint, cross-claim, or counterclaim. The claims procedure is thus prerequisite to a proper exercise of district court jurisdiction.

We do not hold that Johns-Manville can never recover anything; we express no views as to that. Whatever right Johns-Manville may have against the United States, we hold: not yet.

Affirmed.

1

. Based on representations of counsel that federal judicial records would show that Johns-Manville Sales Corporation is one of several subsidiaries of the Manville Corporation, that both Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and the Manville Corporation are in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, that they are debtors in possession, and that certain stay orders do not preclude the debtors in possession from proceeding to collect their assets, it is the implied holding of this opinion that Johns-Manville Corporation is entitled to be heard, no trustee yet having been appointed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 1637

WILSON OCHAR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:24

- cv - 00928

- CMH

- WBP )

Submitted : September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Wilson Ochar, Appellant Pro Se. John Bell Williams, III, ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1637 Doc: 50 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Wilson Ochar seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice and permitting him 21 days to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Ochar seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Bri tt v. DeJoy , 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (“ When a district court grants a plaintiff leave to amend but [] he chooses not to do so, ” the court’s decision is “not .

. . final and, thus, not appealable.”). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, we deny each of Ochar’s pending motions. W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1637 Doc: 50 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1604 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend to physician assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive payments for the adoption and 

use of certified electronic health records, whether or not such physician 

assistants practice at a rural health center or Federally qualified health 

center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2017 

Ms. BASS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend 

to physician assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive 

payments for the adoption and use of certified electronic 

health records, whether or not such physician assistants 

practice at a rural health center or Federally qualified 

health center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health IT Moderniza5 tion for Underserved Communities Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1604 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT ELIGIBILITY 

2 FOR MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH 

3 RECORD INCENTIVE PAYMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(t)(3)(B)(v) of the 

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(t)(3)(B)(v)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘insofar as the assistant is practicing 

7 in a rural health clinic that is led by a physician assistant 

8 or is practicing in a Federally qualified health center that 

9 is so led’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments made 

12 for calendar quarters beginning on or after the date of 

13 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 12.1

                Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Lee Hartwell, as Chief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer
of Hemosol Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
         fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S.
         Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  June 30, 2003

                             /s/ LEE HARTWELL
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Lee Hartwell
                             Chief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Executive
                             Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **A** | **C** | **I** | **ARMANDO C. IBARRA****Certified Public Accountants A Professional Corporation** |
|-------|-------|-------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

****
| Armando C. Ibarra, C.P.A.                                                               | Members of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants                                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Armando Ibarra, Jr., C.P.A., JD                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | Members of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board                                                   |

April 21, 2005

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Armando C. Ibarra, Certified Public Accountants, APC consents to the inclusion of our report of April 14, 2004, on the audited consolidated financial statements of Viper Networks, Inc. and Subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2004, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

  /s/ Armando C. Ibarra, C.P.A.            ARMANDO C. IBARRA, C.P.A.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 273RD DISTRICT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 29th

day of August, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JOHN KEELY BATTLES, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00060-CR; Trial Court No. 10CR18,060

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 21st day of May, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff to Discuss Apparent Violations at Main Yankee; Regional Administrator to Hold Quarterly Press Conference

----

----

I-97-18

March 4, 1997

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT MAINE YANKEE; REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR TO HOLD QUARTERLY PRESS CONFERENCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company on Tuesday, March 11, to discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements at the Maine Yankee nuclear plant in Wiscassett. The predecisional enforcement conference, which is open to the public for observation only, will begin at 9 a.m. in the Media Center at the site.

Immediately following the predecisional enforcement conference, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller will hold a press conference to discuss agency activities concerning Maine Yankee. NRC regional officials hold these news conferences on a quarterly basis to discuss events at regulated nuclear facilities and answer reporters' questions on these subjects.

The apparent violations at Maine Yankee were found during a special NRC inspection conducted in December and January to review safety concerns raised by an NRC Independent Safety Assessment Team (ISAT) which examined conditions at Maine Yankee from July 15 through August 23. The follow-up inspection also verified actions taken by the licensee in response to issues which the ISAT raised. As a result of this inspection, the NRC has identified apparent violations of NRC requirements in five major categories. They include inoperability of safety-related equipment, as well as inadequacies in testing, safety review, procedures and corrective actions.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions. No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

We consent to the reference ofour report on the consolidated balance sheets of  Transmeridian Exploration,Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows foreach of the years in the three year period ended  December 31, 2004, which report appears inthe December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transmeridian Exploration,Inc. annual report on Form 10-K of Transmeridian Exploration, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ John A. Braden &  Company, P.C.. |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |   |
| Houston, Texas  March 15, 2005           |

 

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Euticals, Inc. applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Euticals, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of those controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated June 10, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 17, 2014, 79 FR 34554, Euticals, Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Euticals, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Controlled Substance
ScheduleMethadone (9250)
IIOripavine (9330)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution and sale to its customers. Dated: January 9, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-01307 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P