alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 FOR BERTHEL FISHER & COMPANY LEASING, INC., AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   151,041
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,268,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (83,825)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,335,547
<PP&E>                                       3,277,733
<DEPRECIATION>                               (887,217)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,726,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     14,342,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,621,422
<COMMON>                                       301,060
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,301,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,726,063
<SALES>                                        707,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               707,749
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               385,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             362,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,563)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (128,611)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
No. 65,

Orig.

#### Texas *v.*New Mexico.

[For earlier order herein, see, *e. g., ante,*p. 806.]

Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master are set for oral argument in due course.
H. R. 1211 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 400 N. 

Main Street, Encinal, Texas, as the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ENCINAL VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 400 N. Main Street, Encinal, Texas, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Encinal Veterans Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at September 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and the
Statement of Income for the three months ende September 30, 1999 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,540
<SECURITIES>                                     1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,722
<PP&E>                                       1,589,519
<DEPRECIATION>                               (327,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,272,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          738,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,146
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,467,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,272,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (52,235)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (52,235)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent
A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                             /s/ Vincent A. Wasik
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Vincent A. Wasik
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             May 17, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,400
<PP&E>                                       2,036,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,958,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,585
<BONDS>                                        882,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           954
<OTHER-SE>                                     921,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,958,209
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,521
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,282
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27960]

[[Page 94771]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 784 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-487, K2025-484.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27960 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### In re William W. WHITE, Sr. and Gloria F. White, Debtors. William W. WHITE, Sr. and Gloria F. White, Plaintiffs, v. BANKERS MORTGAGE CORPORATION, formerly known as NCNB Mortgage Corporation, a corporation of the State of North Carolina, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 81-97.

Adv. No. 82-38.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

June 10, 1982.

Michael P. Reynolds, Wilson & Whitting-ton, P. A., Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

William W. White, Sr., Gloria F. White, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HELEN S. BALICK, Bankruptcy Judge.

The parties to this action were reversed in an earlier adversary proceeding. Bankers Mortgage Corporation had sought relief from the automatic stay for the purpose of proceeding with a mortgage foreclosure sale on the Whites’ residential real estate. On February 17, 1982 before the conclusion of the trial, the Whites together with their counsel, counsel for Bankers Mortgage Corporation, and the trustee stipulated to a termination of the stay.

On May 7, the Whites filed a *pro se*motion for the issuance of a preliminary injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 105 to stop the sheriff’s sale of their residential real estate scheduled for May 11 at the suit of Bankers Mortgage Corporation because they believe they now have a confirmable plan which is scheduled for hearing before this court on May 26. Consequently, we must look at that plan preliminarily to see if there is a *543likelihood that it will be confirmed. The plan attempts to cure the default and reinstate Bankers Mortgage Corporation’s mortgage.

On February 22 of this year, this court held that there could be no cure and reinstatement of a mortgage after a judgment of foreclosure had been entered because under Delaware law the mortgage is merged in that judgment. Although that holding was in a Chapter 11 case, the same result would ensue in a Chapter 13 where a judgment of foreclosure had been entered. The policy reasons for such a conclusion as stated by Judge Goetz in *In re: Pearson,*Bkrtcy. 10 B.R. 189, cannot be improved upon and I adopt them in this instance.

Thus, any Chapter 13 plan which attempts to cure and reinstate a mortgage following the entry of a judgment of foreclosure cannot be confirmed. In such a situation the plan would have to deal with payment of the full amount of the judgment within the time period of the plan.

Bankruptcy courts do have the power to grant an injunction under § 105 if the evidence so warrants. But, where relief has been granted from the automatic stay, whether after trial or by agreement, § 105 should not be used to force a creditor back into a Chapter 13 situation. Consequently, the motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 00028

- CV

T ERESA W ARD C OOPER

, Appellant

V

.

B LUE W ATER S HORES P ROPERTY

O WNERS ’ A SSOCIATION , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the County Court at

Law

of Hood County ( C08913 )

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ / s/ Mike Wallach

__________________ Justice Mike Wallach
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**HARDWIRED INTERACTIVE INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hardwired Interactive, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph C. Passlaqua, Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joseph C. Passlaqua and will be retained by Hardwired Interactive, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date:  September 28, 2011

*/s/ Joseph C. Passalaqua*

 Joseph C. Passalaqua

President

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
No. 91-6136.

#### Byers *v.*Armontrout, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFROMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FORM 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,108
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,261
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,534
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,517
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,131
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,131
<LOANS>                                         68,902
<ALLOWANCE>                                        415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,049
<DEPOSITS>                                      73,266
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                663
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 101,049
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,496
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  328
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,824
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,030
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              794
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       22
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    335
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         195
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.54
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       328
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   388
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  415
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               415
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00200 - CV ESTATE OF WILLIAM L. HASTINGS, DECEASED On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 1

Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 28,773 - 1, Honorable W. F. (Corky) Roberts, Presiding



### October 30 , 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant Laura Ponder has filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of this appeal. The Court finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be enti tled. Accordingly, and a s no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. See Tex. R. App. P.2

42.1(a)(1). The parties have not presented an agreement for taxation of costs. Therefore, costs are taxed against appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). James T. Campbell Justice
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Hogan, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 405]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered February 21, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his conviction of murder in the second degree cannot stand because the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to cause the victim’s death. At trial, one witness testified that the defendant turned and shot at him several times while no more than several yards away. Three other witnesses testified that they heard at least two shots fired.

The defendant’s intent to cause the death of another person *(see,*Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), is manifest in his act of repeatedly shooting at the witnesses at close range *(see, People v Horton,*18 NY2d 355, 359, *cert denied*387 US 934; *see also, People v Culpepper,*118 AD2d 866; *People v Milea,*112 AD2d 1011, 1013). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

*673Viewing the representation afforded to the defendant in light of the evidence, the law, and the circumstances presented here, we find that the defendant received meaningful assistance from his trial counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *see also, People v Stahl,*53 NY2d 1048; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245) or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, we have determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent, except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 97-20917

____________ In the Matter Of: MBM INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE LP;

MATZ REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC; INTERMARQUE AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS INCORPORATED,
Debtors.

----------------------------------------- STEWART A. FELDMAN; MARLA B MATZ, D.D.S.,

Appellants,

versus NIEL MORGAN, Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-96-CV-2489) December 11, 1998 Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellants, Stewart Feldman and Marla Matz (the “Feldmans”), appeal t he district court’s
denial of their motion to vacate pursuant to F ED R. C IV

. P. 60(b). This appeal involves the second
Rule 60(b) motion filed by the Feldmans. The district court denied their first Rule 60(b) motion, and

we affirmed that decision in an unpublished opinion. S ee Feldman v. MBM In v estment , No. 97- 20098 (5 th Cir. Dec. 10, 1998). In their second motion, the Feldmans raise no new arguments, nor
do they set forth any new basis for relief. Accordingly, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying their second Rule 60(b) motion. AFFIRMED.-2-