alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SAMUEL RUFFIN and others v. C. B. HARRISON and others.

*Modification of Judgment*— Rehearing.

A rehearing will not be granted upon a summary motion to modiiy a final judgment of this court. See *ante,*76.

*{Moore*v. *Hinnant,*90 N. 0., 163, cited and approved.)

MotioN- to modify judgment, heard at October Term, 1884, of The Supreme Court.

*Messrs. Reade, Busbee & Busbee*and *J. B. Batchelor,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Fuller & Snow*and *E. 0. Smith,*for defendants.

Merrimon, J.

At this term of the court the defendants Ellis and wife and Penelope Egerton, filed their petition to rehear, and they prayed therein that an injunction be granted restraining the collection of the execution heretofore issued in this case against them, pending the application to rehear. We denied the motion for an injunction, and our opinion- in that respect *(ante,*76) was taken as a strong intimation that the application to rehear would Be denied upon the final hearing upon the merits.

The same parties then filed their other petition alleging that the defendant M. F. Harrison is liable for, and ought in equity to be required to pay, for their exoneration, the sum of money they are required by the final decree in this action to pay ; and they pray that the court will amend and modify its decree entered at the last, term, so as to give the relief demanded.

We need not consider now, whether or not the petitioners might have the relief they demand in a proper action for • that purpose : or whether they might have litigated their *399rights as against the defendant M. F. Harrison and had any measure of relief in this action before the final decree; because, the court has no power to amend or modify the final decree, entered at the last term, upon an application like this. *

After final judgment, the court cannot disturb it, unlessupon an application to rehear, or for fraud, accident or mistake alleged in an independent action; or, perhaps, in some cases, a party might be relieved against a “judgment, order or other proceeding taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” within a year after the entry of the same. The Code, §274; *Moore*v. *Hinnant,*90 N. C., 163. This of course does not imply that the court has not power to correct the entry of its orders, judgments and decrees so as to make them conform to the truth of what the court did in granting them,or to set aside an irregular judgment in a proper case.

The practical effect of granting the prayer of the petitioners would be to give them the benefit of a rehearing, upon a summary application to change the final decree at a term of the court subsequent to that at which it was granted. We are not aware of any rule of procedure or practice that warrants such action. The application must be denied,and the petition in this respect dismissed. It is so ordered.

Petition dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Church Street Building: Parking And Transportation Services (NUREG/BR-0451)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0451 (PDF - 731.41 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2011

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24

- 0137 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID WARREN LAMBERT ,

Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0137
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 210/24/2014 17:31:41

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Fermi 2 Docket (050- 00341)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

315

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical T - Testing 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

420

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical T - Testing 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical T - Testing 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical T - Testing 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - M - Mechanical Maintenance / Repair 

193 - Non-conservative action L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 2 of 210/24/2014 17:31:41

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Fermi 2 Docket (050- 00341)

Work Planning & Practices / IR197 - Self-check LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

1155

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 20
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 14, 2003 |                                   |   |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | /s/ Levy  Gerzberg                     |   |   |
|                            | Levy  Gerzberg                         |   |
|                            | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |                                        |        |  |

 

----
PBT Profiler_ PMN TETA TOFA Imid Sanitized
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1846 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 

Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ (for herself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against 

Children Task Force Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Resources, 

5 Officers, and Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to 

6 Our Children Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘PROTECT Our Chil7 dren Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1846 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET 

2 CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 

5 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et seq.) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by 

7 striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’; and 

8 (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 

9 17617(a)(10)), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2018’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.79

LOGO

November 17, 2008

William
C. Houghton

Dear Bill:

Anesiva, Inc. (the
Company) is pleased to offer you an amendment (the Amendment) to your employment terms, as set forth in the offer letter between you and the Company, dated July 9, 2008 (the Offer Letter). The employment
terms set forth in this Amendment are effective as of November 17, 2008 (the Amendment Date). Unless this Amendment specifically states that it supersedes a term in the Offer Letter, the terms of the Offer Letter shall remain
binding and in full force and effect.

1. Retention Bonus.You will be eligible to receive a Retention Bonus in an amount equal to
two (2) months of your base salary currently in effect, to be earned and payable on the following schedule: (i) 50% of the bonus on November 17, 2008, (ii) 25% of the bonus on November 26, 2008, and (iii) 25% of the
bonus on December 15, 2008.

In the event that you resign from employment with the Company for any reason before February 9,
2009, you agree that you will repay to the Company this Retention Bonus amount paid to you (Retention Repayment Amount) pursuant to this Section. Any Retention Repayment Amount that must be repaid pursuant to this paragraph will be paid
within thirty (30) days following your last date of employment with the Company.

In the event that you are involuntarily terminated
from employment with the Company, you will not be liable for repayment of the Retention Bonus.

2. Employment Relationship.
Your employment with the Company is and continues to be at will as described in Section 12 of your Offer Letter.

3.
Supersedes. This Amendment supersedes and replaces any prior agreements, representations or understandings, whether written, oral or implied, between you and the Company regarding this subject matter described herein, provided that unless
specifically superseded by this Amendment, the terms of the Offer Letter remain in full force and effect.

We hope that you find the
forgoing terms acceptable. You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this Amendment by signing and dating the Amendment and returning it to me.



Very truly yours,ANESIVA, INC.By:

/s/ Jean-Frederic ViretJean-Frederic Viret Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer


I have read, and accept and agree to, the terms of this Amendment to my Offer Letter:



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ William C. Houghton
|William C. Houghton    

Dated: 11-19-08
No: II-19-010 April 2, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Names Senior Resident Inspector at BWXT Nuclear Fuel Facility in Lynchburg 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the NRC’s 

Region II office in Atlanta have selected Alejandro Alen as the 

new senior resident inspector at the BWX Technologies 

nuclear fuel facility in Lynchburg, Va.

Alen joined the NRC in 2008. After completing the 

agency’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, 

he was qualified as a reactor inspector in 2010 and worked in 

the Region II Division of Reactor Safety, conducting 

engineering team inspections at operating nuclear power plants. 

He also served as the acting resident inspector at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant in Florida in 

2011, and later became a project engineer in the Region II Division of Reactor Projects. Alen was 

the resident inspector for the two operating units at the Vogtle nuclear power plant in Georgia from 

2014 until his selection as the senior resident inspector at BWXT.

Alen earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Puerto 

Rico.

The NRC has resident inspectors at two fuel facilities (BWXT and Nuclear Fuel Services in 

Erwin, Tenn.) and at all commercial nuclear power plants. They conduct inspections, monitor major 

work projects and interact with plant workers and the public.
No: II-19-019 April 17, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant

Performance and Construction Inspection of New Units

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 25 to 

provide information and answer questions about the 2018 safety performance of the Vogtle nuclear 

power plant, as well as the agency’s assessment of the two units under construction.

The open house will run from 6-7 p.m. at the Augusta Technical College’s Waynesboro 

campus, 216 Highway 24 South, in Waynesboro, Ga. NRC employees responsible for operating 

plant and construction inspections, including the resident inspectors based full-time at both sites, 

will be available at the open house.

The plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., is located near Waynesboro, 

approximately 26 miles southeast of Augusta.

The NRC concluded that the Vogtle units operated safely during 2018. At the end of the 

year, all inspection findings and performance indicators were green or of low safety significance. 

Likewise, the NRC found that the two units under construction met all inspection health and safety 

objectives. As a result, the operating units and the construction units remain under the NRC’s 

normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process and the Construction Reactor Oversight Process both 

use color-coded inspection findings and indicators to measure plant performance. The colors start at 

green and increase to white, yellow or red, commensurate with the safety significance of the issues 

involved. Inspection findings or performance indicators with more than very low safety significance 

trigger increased NRC oversight.

Inspections are performed by the NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from 

the NRC Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter for the two operating units, which includes upcoming 

inspection plans for the plant, and the construction oversight letter are both available on the NRC 

website. Current performance information for Vogtle Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also on the website and is 

updated on a quarterly basis.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report.



|                  |  |                         |  | 
|----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 2, 2007 |  |                         |  | 
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | /s/ Linda Baddour       |  | 
|                  |  | Linda Baddour           |  | 
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,111,526
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,111,526
<EQUITIES>                                      22,932
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,138,602
<CASH>                                         124,395
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             679,492
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          34,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,364,670
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,643,507
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            196,556
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                120,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,364,670
<PREMIUMS>                                     108,390
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             31,285
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,104
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      94,330
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     40,777
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    728
<INCOME-TAX>                                        39
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------








                                      11


<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-2
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-2


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicers
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
# L_2015115DE.01004302.xml

| 6.5.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 115/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 115/43

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1367/2014 des Rates vom 15. Dezember 2014 zur Festsetzung der Fangmöglichkeiten von Fischereifahrzeugen der Union für bestimmte Bestände von Tiefseearten (2015 und 2016)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 366 vom 20. Dezember 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 366 vom 20. Dezember 2014

Seite 10, Art: Rundnasen-Grenadier und Nordatlantik-Grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris und Macrourus berglax, Gebiet: Unionsgewässer und internationale Gewässer der Gebiete VIII, IX, X, XII und XIV (RNG/8X14-) für Rundnasen-Grenadier (2), (RHG/8X14-) für Nordatlantik-Grenadier, Fußnote 1 (berichtigt durch Berichtigung in ABl. L 57 vom 28.2.2015, S. 18):

2

anstatt:

| „(1) | In den Unionsgewässern und internationalen Gewässern der Gebiete VIII, IX, X, XII und XIV (RNG/*8X14- für Rundnasen-Grenadier; RHG/*8X14- für Nordatlantik-Grenadier) dürfen höchstens 10 % jeder Quote gefischt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(1)

In den Unionsgewässern und internationalen Gewässern der Gebiete VIII, IX, X, XII und XIV (RNG/*8X14- für Rundnasen-Grenadier; RHG/*8X14- für Nordatlantik-Grenadier) dürfen höchstens 10 % jeder Quote gefischt werden.“

muss es heißen:

| „(1) | In den Unionsgewässern und internationalen Gewässern der Gebiete Vb, VI und VII (RNG/*5B67- für Rundnasen-Grenadier; RHG/*5B67- für Nordatlantik-Grenadier) dürfen höchstens 10 % jeder Quote gefischt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(1)

In den Unionsgewässern und internationalen Gewässern der Gebiete Vb, VI und VII (RNG/*5B67- für Rundnasen-Grenadier; RHG/*5B67- für Nordatlantik-Grenadier) dürfen höchstens 10 % jeder Quote gefischt werden.“

---