alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Full Scale Loop Seal experiments with TRACE V5 Patch 1 (NUREG/IA-0403)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0403 (PDF - 612.18 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2009**Date Published:** December 2011

**Prepared by:** Seppo Hillberg

VTT – Technical Research Centre of Finland Nuclear Power Plant Modelling P.O.B. 1000 02044 VTT Finland

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Full scale loop seal experiments have been simulated with thermal hydraulic simulation code TRACE V5 Patch 1. Multiple nodalizations were created different geometric accuracy. The main interest in the simulations was the residual water level in the horizontal pipe. Also pressure behaviour during the air blow to the loop seal and effects of different maximum time steps and initial liquid levels were studied.

Simulations revealed differencies in results obtained with different nodalizations. Most of the nodalizations produced reasonable results except a simple 90° bend that used grav terms elevation option (namelist variable ielev=0). This model cleared too much water out of the loop seal. A very similar model using cell angle elevation option didn't suffer from this problem.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 2414** 

ADAM J. CIRALSKY , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. GEORGE J. TENET, individually and in his capacity as Director of Central Intelligence; LOUIS JOSEPH FREEH, in his capac ity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; ROBERT MCNAMARA, JR., individually and in his capacity as the General Counsel Central Intelligence Agency; JOHN DOE, individually and in his capacity as the Chief, Counterintelligence Center, CIA; EDW ARD CURRAN, individually and in his capacity as Chief, Counterintelligence Group, CIA; JOHN LEWIS, individually and in his capacity as Assistant Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; RICHARD CALDER, individually and in his capacity as Deputy Dir ector for Administration, CIA; DAWN EILENBERGER, individually and in her capacity as the Principal Deputy General Counsel, CIA; KATHLEEN MCGINN, individually and in her capacity as Complaints Attorney, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, CIA ,
Defen dants

– Appellees ,
and

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:10

- c v - 00 911

- LMB

- JFA )2 Submitted : August 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, Douglas N. Letter, Dana Kaersvang, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC E, Washington, D.C., for Appellee s
.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Adam J. Ciralsky appeals the district court ’ s judgment
dismissing his complaint alleging various causes of action under

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for violations of his constitutional rights

and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2006) . All of Ciralsky’s

claims arise from the revocation of his security clearance and

his subsequent terminat ion from federal employment

. The
district court dismissed Ciralsky’s complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, based
on qualified immunity, and as barred by the applicable statute

of limitations. Having thoroughly r eviewed the record, we

conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s judgment . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court a nd argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered June 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00685-CV

IN RE TRUE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, AND JEFFREY P. "BOOMER" 

CORNWELL, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-01046-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is relators’ June 16, 2015 unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for 

writ of mandamus. We GRANT the motion. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we 

DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER each party to bear its own costs.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOSEPH M. UMAN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 20-3004 (D.C. No. 2:06-CR-20122-KHV-JPO-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges. **

________________ _________________ This matter is before the court on the “Joint Motion for Summary Disposition/Affirmance.” The parties jointl y move for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment ba sed on this court’s recent published decision in United States v. Salazar, 987 F. 3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2021), en banc reh'g denied Apr. 12, 2021. The parties acknowledge that this court’s decision in Salazar resolves Defendant-Appellant Uman’s appeal in the government’s favor, but the parties note

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
** Because this matter is being d ecided on a joint motion for summary affirmance, the panel has de termined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the de termination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is ther efore submitted without oral argument. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 28, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court2 that Mr. Uman preserves the issue on appeal for review in the United States Supreme
Court. Accordingly, the joint motion for su mmary affirmance is GRANTED. Based on this court’s decision in Salazar, the j udgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
IB 

Union Calendar No. 410 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1778 

[Report No. 115–545] 

To provide that an order by the Secretary of the Interior imposing a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall not take effect unless a joint resolution 

of approval is enacted, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2017 

Ms. CHENEY (for herself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. MCKINLEY, and 

Mr. ROTHFUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GOSAR and Mr. JENKINS of West Virginia 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1778 RH

A BILL 

To provide that an order by the Secretary of the Interior 

imposing a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall 

not take effect unless a joint resolution of approval is 

enacted, and for other purposes. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1778 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FOR ORDER BY 

4 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR IMPOSING A 

5 MORATORIUM ON FEDERAL COAL LEASING. 

6 An order by the Secretary of the Interior imposing 

7 a moratorium on Federal coal leasing shall have no force 

8 or effect unless— 

9 (1) the Secretary submits to Congress the pro10 posed order; and 

11 (2) a joint resolution that approves the order is 

12 enacted within 30 legislative days after the proposed 

13 order is received by Congress. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 410 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1778 

[Report No. 115–545] 

A BILL 

To provide that an order by the Secretary of the 

poses. tion of approval is enacted, and for other purleasing shall not take effect unless a joint resoluInterior imposing a moratorium on Federal coal 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A.A., a minor, by and through his Guardian 

ad Litem, Lorena Arreola, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-55758 

D.C. No. 

3:15-cv-01244-H-WVG 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 11, 2018 

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and SIMON,** District 

Judge.

A.A. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the 

United States. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See United States v. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the 

District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

FILED

SEP 27 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Kwai Fun Wong, 135 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 (2015). Reviewing de novo, see Booth v. 

United States, 914 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir. 2019), we affirm.

“[A]n attorney’s filing by mail shortly before a deadline expires constitutes 

routine negligence.” Okafor v. United States, 846 F.3d 337, 340 (9th Cir. 2017). 

Even if the deadline would not have been missed but for the courier’s delivery 

delay, we “do not recognize run-of-the mill mistakes as grounds for equitable 

tolling” because they do not amount to an “extraordinary circumstance.” Id.

(quoting Luna v. Kernan, 784 F.3d 640, 646 (9th Cir. 2015)). That the U.S. Postal 

Service and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services are both branches 

of the federal government makes no difference. The Postal Service is “an 

independent establishment of the executive branch,” Currier v. Potter, 379 F.3d 

716, 725 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting 39 U.S.C. § 201), that is “run more like a 

business,” id. (quoting Franchise Tax Bd. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 467 U.S. 512, 519–

20 (1984)).

AFFIRMED.
null

2010-01-20

483.9982

eng - Argued: 2010-01-20. Docket number: 3-09-0389
# **Exhibit 99.2**

# **Certification**

I, Preston A. Miller, Executive Vice President andTreasurer of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certifythat:

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, andall reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed inrespect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofAmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2001-A;

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicing informationrequired to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale andservicing agreement is included in these reports;

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

5.               I have disclosed any significant deficiencies relatingto the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth inthe sale and servicing agreement to the registrant’s certified publicaccountants.

Date: January 29, 2003

/s/Preston A. MillerPreston A. MillerExecutive Vice President and Treasurer

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME, a/k/a Shorty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (4:10-cr-00053-RGD-FBS-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Asmar Nafis Newsome, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Cross, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Asmar Nafis Newsome appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) and denying his motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. See U.S Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 1B1.10(b)(2), p.s. (2014). Accordingly, we affirm. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., China Participate in Disaster Management Exchange

By Staff Sgt. Michael Behlin8th Theater Sustainment Command

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                          
|------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
|                   |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Testing, Verifying, and Validating SAPHIRE Versions 6.0 and 7.0 (NUREG/CR-6688)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6688 (PDF - 16.01 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2000**Date Published:** October 2000

**Prepared by:** C.L. Smith, S.T. Wood, K.L. Kvarfordt, P.H. McCabe, R.D. Fowler, C.L. Hoffman, KLD. Russell, INEEL E. Lois, NRC

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3129

E. Lois, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code L1429

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes a testing-based verification and validation (TV&V) process created for SAPHIRE (System Analysis Program for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluation), version 6.0 and subsequent versions. The TV&V process comprises a set of specially designed software models used to test each major version of SAPHIRE (such as versions 6.0 and 7.0) and individual interim releases (6.1, 6.2, etc.).

SAPHIRE is a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) software tool developed at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) for use by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). SAPHIRE was created to provide a means for depicting a nuclear power plant's response to an accident; evaluating and quantifying the risk represented by those models; and performing sensitivity analyses associated with the attributes of the models. SAPHIRE is best suited for quantifying sequences leading to core damage (Level 1 PRA); estimating radioactive releases to the environment (Level 2 PRA); and, to a limited degree, to quantify risk in terms of evaluating release consequences to the environment and the public (Level 3 PRA).

The TV&V process was engineered to provide a dynamic verification and validation process for testing all releases and versions of SAPHIRE. The process allows for an increase in the software quantification quality to a high level, as dictated by the nature of the testing models.

This document comprises a main report and three appendices. The main report presents an overall perspective on the TV&V approach; specifics on the testing, verification, and validation process; and the results of the TV&V process. Appendix A provides the background, including the history of SAPHIRE; prior verification and validation efforts; the SAPHIRE code development control process; and minimum PC requirements. Appendix B details the test reference descriptions. Appendix C presents test results from a sample case.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of A M Marketing,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: May 11, 2006                                     Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 471 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-454, K2025-451.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27930 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00190-CV

SHERICA REDRICK, Appellant

V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS AND ANDRES ARMANDO GARCIA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-12379

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on December 

18, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE