alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: II-19-013 April 12, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 23 to 

provide information and answer questions regarding the safety performance of the Browns Ferry

nuclear power plant, including the recent annual assessment letter covering all of 2018.

The open house will run from 5-6 p.m., at the Athens City Hall Council Chambers, 

200 Hobbs St. West, Athens, Ala. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the 

resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available at the open house.

The three-unit Browns Ferry plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located 

near Athens, approximately 32 miles west of Huntsville.

The NRC concluded that the Browns Ferry plant operated safely during 2018. At the end of 

the year, all inspection findings and performance indicators were green or of low safety 

significance. As a result, the three Browns Ferry units remain under the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

Inspections are performed by the NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from 

the NRC Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter, which includes upcoming inspection plans for the plant, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Browns Ferry Unit 1, Unit 2

and Unit 3 is also on the website and is updated on a quarterly basis.
#### In the Matter of Isaac M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Niagara County Attorney, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 49]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports Family Court’s finding that respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]). Evidence that the victim experienced "a lot” of pain after respondent struck him with a skateboard and that stitches were required to close the cut beside the victim’s eye is sufficient to establish physical injury *(see, People v Fallen,*194 AD2d 928, *lv denied*82 NY2d 753; *People v*
      *806
      *Beaton,*152 AD2d 992, *lv denied*74 NY2d 845; *People v Ruttenbur,*112 AD2d 13).

We have examined respondent’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Crapsi, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Alan Fuhrman, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 of Ambit Biosciences Corporation; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
|   | /s/   ALAN FUHRMAN              |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Alan   Fuhrman                  |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal   Financial Officer) |

 

Date: August 8, 2014

 

----
No. 82-5953.

#### Cockrell *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report of The KingThomason
Group,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2003  (the  "Report"), I, T.E. King III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  June  10,  2004

                              /s/  Thomas  E.  King  III
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              T.E.  King  III
                              Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-KSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.







                                                                      EXHIBIT 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Order to Washington Public Power Supply System Confirms Agreement toComplete Fire Barrier Corrective Actions

----

----

No. 98-43

March 26, 1998

**NRC ORDER TO WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMCONFIRMS AGREEMENT TO COMPLETE FIRE BARRIER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a confirmatory order to the Washington Public Power Supply System confirming the utility's commitment to complete Thermo-Lag fire barrier corrective actions at its Washington Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2) power plant near Richland, Washington, by Spring 1999.

In a letter to Supply System officials, Sam Collins, Director of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, said the order was issued because of concern "that some licensees may not be making adequate progress toward resolving the plant-specific issues, and that some implementation schedules may either be too tenuous or too protracted."

Thermo-Lag is a fire barrier material manufactured and supplied by Thermal Science, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, and has been used to provide fire-resistance to wiring and equipment at nuclear plants. The NRC staff has been concerned that Thermo-Lag 330-1 fire barrier systems installed by some of its licensees may not provide the intended level of fire protection and that licensees using them may not be meeting regulatory requirements. Between 1992 and 1994, the NRC staff issued letters to all nuclear utilities asking licensees to submit plans and schedules for resolving the issue. All licensees with Thermo-Lag fire barriers have implemented around-the-clock "fire watches," using workers to patrol vital plant areas on a regular basis to watch for signs of fire until corrective actions are completed.

In his letter to Supply System officials, Collins noted that NRC staff have been meeting with licensees to review their progress in completing implementation of their fire barrier programs, but have been concerned with slow progress on resolution of the issue at certain plants.

The Washington Public Power Supply System was one of the licensees with which NRC staff has periodically held meetings. At these meetings, the NRC staff reviewed the Supply System's schedule for Thermo-Lag corrective actions--submitted to the NRC in 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1997--and concluded they are reasonable. The Supply System on March 12 formally agreed to the terms of the confirmatory order.

Other utilities are expected to receive similar orders in the coming months.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3 Against Twenty-Five Post-Dryout Experiments Performed at the Royal Institute of Technology (NUREG/IA-0094, STUDSVIK/NS–90/93)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0094 (PDF 2.99 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1993

**Prepared by:** Lars Nilsson

Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate 6-61182 Nykoping Sweden

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 has been made against various experimental data, among others data from twenty-five post-dryout experiments conducted at the Royal Institute of Technology (RIT) in Stockholm. As the MOD3 version of RELAP5 has now been released, incorporating a different method of calculating critical heat flux compared to RELAP5/MOD2, it seemed justified to make another assessment against the same RIT-data.

The results show that the axial dryout position is generally better predicted by the MOD3 than by the MOD2 version. The prediction is, however, still nonconservative, i.e. the calculated dryout position falls in most cases downstream the actual measured point. While the pre-dryout heat transfer 'seems to be equal for MOD2 and MOD3, both versions giving slightly higher wall temperatures than the experiments, there is a considerable difference in the post-dryout heat transfer. The results of the RIT data comparison indicate that MOD3 underpredicts the post-dryout wall temperatures remarkably while MOD2 gave reasonable agreement. In this respect RELAP5/MOD3 shows no improvement over RELAP5/MOD2.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC to Hold Public Meeting in Cleveland on Recent Inspection at Advanced Medical  Systems

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-13

February 11, 1998

**NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING IN CLEVELAND ON RECENT INSPECTION AT ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on February 26 to discuss recent inspection findings at Advanced Medical Systems (AMS), Inc., in Cleveland, Ohio, and other issues related to the facility. The inspection included radiation surveys of the neighborhood surrounding the facility.

The meeting will start at 7:00 p.m. in the Holy Redeemer School, 15720 Kipling Avenue, in Cleveland.

The NRC staff will present an update on the facility, discuss the results of its recent inspection, and respond to questions.

AMS, located at 1020 London Road in Cleveland, formerly manufactured sealed cobalt-60 sources for medical uses, an activity now discontinued. Currently, AMS is authorized only to handle sealed cobalt-60 sources and to perform routine radiation protection activities, including decommissioning work.

A special NRC inspection in December found no radioactive contamination outside the AMS property and no radiation levels above normal background radiation at nearby neighborhood locations. At the perimeter of the fence on the south side of the facility, radiation readings were approximately twice the local background readings, but this is well below the NRC limit for an unrestricted area.

NRC conducted the inspection in response to concerns expressed by Cleveland city officials and neighborhood residents. Inspectors reviewed the facility's fire detection and security systems and the storage of radioactive waste. They also performed radiation surveys and collected environmental samples at AMS, at surrounding residences, at a nearby industrial site, and at a neighborhood park. The Ohio Department of Health and the City of Cleveland Fire Department participated in portions of the NRC inspection.

There have been other special radiological inspections at the facility and the neighboring residential areas. In 1985, Oak Ridge Associated Universities and NRC staff collected facility and environmental samples. No cobalt-60 contamination was detected outside of the AMS property.

In response to concerns from the Cleveland City Council, NRC conducted a special radiological survey with the Ohio Department of Health in 1993 of the residential, public and commercial properties surrounding AMS. No cobalt-60 contamination was detected. Radiation levels were consistent with the natural local background levels, except for the brush line between the AMS property and the rail road tracks which was just slightly above the normal local background level, yet below NRC limits for an unrestricted area.

A written report on the December inspection will be issued in a few weeks, and will be available to the public.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 4 Page 1 of 1 8/22/08 

### AD Title: Rolls
- Roy ce Propeller Shafts Docket No. FAA
- 2009
- 0082 Directorate Identifier: 2008
- NE
- 42
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work
h ours Labo r cost ( @ $80/hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U
. S
. Fleet Nacelle removal/installation from A/C 14.0 $ 1,120.00 $ 1,120.00 659 $ 738,080 Engine/PGB removal/installation from nacelle 6.0 $ 480.00 $ 480.00 659 $ 316,320 Disassemble, inspect and reassemble PGB 50.0 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 659 $ 2,636,000 Rework prop shaft 14.0 $ 1,120.00 $ 1,120.00 659 $ 738,080 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U
. S
. fleet: $ 4,428,480



### Costs covered under warranty **Special considerations for Econom**  **ic Analysis :**  

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO **DOT Regulatory Policie s and Procedures:**  Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain belo w NO **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
THE LISENBY FIRM, P.C. A Professional Corporation of Attorneys and Counselors at Law

P.O. Box 101236

Fort Worth, Texas 76185

Telephone: (817) 615-9505 Facsimile: (866) 381-4215

January 26, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk VIA: E-File

Third Court of Appeals

Price Daniel Sr. Building

209 West 14th Street, Room 101

Austin, Texas 78701

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-14-00385-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-1-GN-09-001874

Sunset Transportation, Inc. and MEL Transport, Inc. d/b/a Magnum Transportation, Inc.

v. The Texas Department of Transportation, and Amadeo Saenz, Jr., in his Official 

Capacity as Director of Texas Department of Transportation

Dear Clerk of the Court:

Pursuant to your letter dated January 21, 2015, Appellants intend to argue this case before 

the Court on February 25, 2015.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Desiree Lewis

Desiree Lewis

Paralegal to KENT J. LISENBY

/dl

cc: Amy Kovar

ACCEPTED

03-14-00385-CV

3894561

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/26/2015 11:30:36 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/26/2015 11:30:36 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
No. 90-6295.

#### King *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2021-1





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of October 27, 2021 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 26 th day of March, 2024.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President, Financial Services
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 30, 2015 

TO: File / Public Docket EPA–R09–OAR–2015-0432 

FROM: Rory Mays, EPA Region 9, Air Quality Analysis Office 

RE: Call with California Air Resources Board regarding VOC and ammonia emissions 

inventory 

In reviewing the 2015 San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Plan it was not clear whether the 

emissions inventory presented in Appendix B of the Plan reflected reductions in ammonia 

emissions resulting from three San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (or “District”) 

rules: Rule 4570 (“Confined Animal Facilities”), Rule 4565 (“Biosolids, Animal Manure, and 

Poultry Litter Operations”), and Rule 4566 (“Organic Material Composting Operations”). 

On a July 31, 2015 phone call, Webster Tasat, California Air Resources Board (CARB), 

affirmed that the emissions inventory in the 2015 San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Plan reflected 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) and ammonia emission reductions from Rule 4570 and VOC 

emission reductions from Rules 4565 and 4566. In other words, the ammonia emission 

reductions from Rules 4565 and 4566 have not been reflected in the emissions inventory.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Instructions for Completing NRC's Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest (NUREG/BR-0204)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Daleen Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeanne
Prayther, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jeanne T. Prayther
------------------------
Jeanne T. Prayther
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, “Human Immunology Project Consortium (U19)”.                    

*Date:*                         February 18-20, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                              ( print page 3972)    

*Agenda:*                         To review grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lakshmi Ramachandra, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5061,                         *ramachandral@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 20, 2015.

David Clary, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-01227 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P