alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO OF ATARI, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atari, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, James Caparro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By:
    /s/  James CaparroName:
    James CaparroTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer Date: February 9, 2005 Page 46
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15



August 14, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:       Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

         1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

         2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907) 1998 Employee Incentive
Compensation Plan


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 10, 2000, except for the last
paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is August 14, 2001 on our review of
interim financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of and for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2000
and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
then ended is incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred
to above.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAMS 
Small Grant Program for New Investigators (R03).
    Date: February 18-19, 2015.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Xincheng Zheng, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Arthritis, 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, 
Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f28a9b9c919a979c95dc889a979c95b29c9b9adc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f38b9a9d909b969d94dd899b969d94b39d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01084 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

ZORAN CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2005 |   |                                  |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                               |   | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                     |   |
|                               |   | Levy Gerzberg                         |
|                               |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order filed November 25, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00891

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF Z .S., C.S

- T., T.S

- T., T.S

- T., T.S

- T., CHI LDREN , Appellant

V.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIV E SERVICES, Appel lee

On Appeal from the 306th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17CP0118



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 12, 2019 . Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.
3 4.5(c). The record does not contain the Order appointing J. Elizabeth Spears as appellate counsel for appellant S.S.The Galveston County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental

clerk’s record on or before December 2, 2019, containing the Order appoint ing J. Elizabeth Spears as appellate counsel for appellant S.S

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff Sets Enforcement Conference with CP&L to Discuss Regulatory  Concerns at Robinson

----

----

No: II-98-09

February 13, 1998

**NRC STAFF SETS ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH CP&L TO DISCUSS REGULATORY CONCERNS AT ROBINSON**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement conference with Carolina Power & Light Company in Atlanta on February 19 to discuss regulatory concerns associated with the Robinson Nuclear Plant's design control process and the plant's safety injection pumps.

During an NRC inspection in April and May of 1997 and another follow-up inspection in early January 1998, the NRC staff identified two apparent violations which will be discussed at the enforcement conference.

The first apparent violation involves a number of calculation deficiencies which appear to indicate a programmatic problem in the plant's design control process. Nuclear plants use thousands of engineering calculations in the plant design, and the data in those calculations are then used in many of the plant's operating procedures and safety analyses. The NRC inspections found that numerous calculations at the Robinson plant contained errors. While the inspectors concluded that the safety significance of each individual calculation error was minor, the large number of deficiencies suggest an apparent broader problem in the design control program.

The second apparent violation resulted from a modification made to safety injection pumps in 1988. The plant's safety injection pumps are designed to provide water during accident situations, but the NRC inspectors found that in certain situations, the modification may not provide adequate water supply to allow the pumps to operate properly.

The conference will be held at 1:30 p.m. in the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, S. W. The meeting is open to observation by members of the public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order filed January 31, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00054-CR

____________

DARRYL WAYNE LINDSEY, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-12-14947

ORDER

 Appellant’s brief discloses the name of a child victim of sexual assault 

under the age of 17. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 57.02(h); Tex. R. App. P. 

9.10(b). Accordingly, the brief is STRICKEN. 

Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with Tex. Code Crim. Proc. 

art. 57.02 and Tex. R. App. P. 9.10 by February 11, 2019.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------


We have issued our report dated March 20, 2003 and December 1, 2003 accompanying
the financial statements of MR3 Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for
the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, which is included in this
Registration Statement. We consent to the inclusion of our report in this
Registration Statement.


/s/ Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Co.

Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Co., LLP

San Francisco, California
February 9, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Withdraws $110,000 Fine Against Entergy's Waterford 3 Nuclear Power Plant

----

----

RIV: 99-23 May 25, 1999

 

**NRC WITHDRAWS $110,000 FINE AGAINST ENTERGY'S WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has withdrawn a $110,000 civil penalty it proposed in June 1998 against Entergy Operations, Inc.'s Waterford 3 nuclear power plant near Taft, Louisiana.

The NRC made the decision to rescind its action after considering new information submitted by Entergy in response to the enforcement action. The original civil penalty cited Waterford 3 for four violations associated with the testing of cooling water flow in the high pressure safety injection system (HPSI). The NRC has dropped two of these violations and re-classified the remaining two as Severity Level IV, which have no civil penalty.

The original fine was proposed because, in December 1997, NRC determined that the design analysis of the HPSI system for Waterford did not account for uncertainties in the instrumentation used and therefore did not demonstrate that the flow of cooling water would be sufficient to cool the nuclear core during certain accidents. Subsequent analysis using improved methods has shown that the cooling water flow is currently and has always been adequate to assure the safety of the plant. Nevertheless, the NRC held that this problem should have been discovered and handled more promptly, and that the regulations thus violated were serious enough to warrant a civil penalty.

The NRC maintains that the facts of its June 1998 action are correct, but, after reconsideration, concluded it had inappropriately applied its regulations to the issues and that violation of requirements warranting a civil penalty had not occurred.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Review of the Three Mile Island-1 Probabilistic Risk Assessment (NUREG/CR-5457, EGG-2572)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5457 (PDF - 6.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 1989**Date Published:**November 1989

**Prepared by:** H.J. Reilly1, D.L Schurman1, H.J. Welland1, R.C. Bertucio2, S.A. Eide3, P.R. Davis4, S.E. Mays5, A.J. Buslik6, N.C. Chokshi6

1 EG&G Idaho, Inc. P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415

2 EI International, Inc. (presently with NUS Corporation)3 EI International, Inc.4 PRD Consulting5 Tenera6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

for Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-761D01570

**Prepared for:**Division of Systems Research Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC FIN A-6892

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Level I Probabilistic Risk Assessment that was prepared by Pickard, Lowe and Garrick for GPU Nuclear, and forwarded to NRC, was reviewed. The review included both plant internal events and three kinds of external events: plant fires, seismic events and river flooding. At the close of the review, the authors estimated the frequencies the core damage sequences would have if the recommended corrections were made to the data and assumptions. It was concluded that the recommended corrections would have a major on the estimated risk profile of TMI-1, including major increases in some sequence frequencies and major decreases in others.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED JULY 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TREASURY INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  717,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    456,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,205,579
<PP&E>                                         646,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,688,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,743,035
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,878
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,677,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,688,123
<SALES>                                        1,357,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,357,829
<CGS>                                          1,310,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,310,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (188,964)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,715,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (262,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 1,977,738
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,715,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.104
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.104
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Felix, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 517]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the People, the trial testimony of the detectives who participated in the buy-and-bust operation that resulted in defendant’s arrest establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932). The inconsistencies in their testimony were minor and properly placed before the jury whose evaluation and resolution of same cannot be held to be "manifestly erroneous” *(People v Corporan,*169 AD2d 643). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-563

In Re: ROBERT RONALD SCITTARELLI,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-127-1)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Ronald Scittarelli, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Scittarelli has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking an order compelling the Clerk of Court of the Middle District of North Carolina to provide him with information regarding

whether the defendants in a pending case were admitted to that

court’s bar. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426

U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there

are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. See

In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The party seeking

mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no

other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his

right to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem.

Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980) (citations omitted).

Scittarelli has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny

Scittarelli’s mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: August 6, 2007
# Open Archives Initiative (OAI)

**Harvest OAI-PMH records (XML format) for U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and development reports.**

****OSTI has established an OAI (Open Archives Initiative) server (see OAI Repository Manual) to allow harvesting of metadata for full-text DOE research and development reports contained in OSTI.GOV.  Included are reports in physics, chemistry, materials, biology, environmental sciences, energy technologies, engineering, computer and information science, renewable energy, and other topics.  These reports are produced by DOE, the DOE national laboratories, and DOE contractors and grantees primarily from 1991 forward. Additional legacy documents are included as they become available in electronic format.

As an OAI data provider, OSTI exposes structured metadata via OAI-PMH to service providers who can harvest the metadata.  Additional information on the OAI may be found at the Open Archives Initiative website.  If you have questions about the OSTI OAI server, contact OAIrecords@osti.gov.

                                - Persistent Identifier Services
                                - API Documentation
                                - DOE MARC Records System
                                - Open Archives Initiatives
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, P. Thomas Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    P. Thomas JenkinsP. Thomas JenkinsChief Executive Officer




Dated: November 17, 2003