alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Data Base on the Behavior of High Burnup Fuel Rods with Zr-1%Nb Cladding and U0 2  Fuel (VVER Type) under Reactivity Accident Conditions (NUREG/IA-0156)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
$OWKRXJK WKH FDSWLRQ RI WKH FD

32XU *DUDJH ́ WKURXJKRXW WKH FRXUVH RI QDPH LQ IDFW LV 32XUV *DUDJH ́ :H ZLOO *DUDJH ́



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


	




85 $5$*( $1' 5(&.(5

	(59,&( 2:,1* 

(&29(5< 662&,$7,21 2)

+,2

	





,7< 2) 2/80%86 $9,',/621 2%%,( ($9(56

	


 !"#$%&'(!
)*'!+	'

$%'(!	.'(!%)*,'%*-'$

0!%1!	

%1.!+32.)!4

!-*+!+")+*#!+32

!$%!36
7

2.+1!,
5 



  !"









 
  	.,")  ,(/%9 7
8
	 
::;	  #.&/., (* $%  !##")'"<*+  !%%*, 7
7 =  8
=:#.&/.,(*$% !##!!2"&!,.%9("%+'
:77=8#!+(*$%&*-.,.%*"!







7
 8 7 *%-.*' 2.+1!  =#"*)'*$$,

 !##!!,.%,"%"1!")+%!-9!%	!%<*-!
)->?.%,@A")(*-% %"'*) !%"'*)1"'B*)1/.,*)!,,*)'(!*'C$#.&/.,")+'(!B*)1")+!-<!%C,,-*"'*)$(*>?@A"'%"+!",,-*"'*)$'B'%.-9 !%"'%,/%.1(',.*'"1"*),''(!*'C$#.&/.,>'(!?*'C@A")+-!%'"*)$*',$$*-*"#,'!)D*)!)$%-!&!)'$(" '!%E$'(!#.&/.,*'C+!>'(!?'B*)1%+*)")-!@AB(*-(%!1.#"'!,-),!),."#'B*)1 !%"'*),	 !-*$*-"##C.%,")+"##!1!+'("''(!
)'!%,'"'!&&!%-!-'>?
@A 
	 F E>-A>A %!!& ', '(! 'B*)1 %+*)")-!B(*-("&)1'(!%'(*)1,%!G.*%!,'(!B)!%,")+ !%"'%,$ 'B '%.-9, ' /'"*) " #*-!),! $%& '(! *'C &"*)'"*)*),.%")-!")+-& #CB*'('(!% %!1.#"'%C %!G.*%!&!)',  ,7< 2) 2/80%86 +,2 2'( -( E

>A)-%,,&'*),$%,.&&"%CD.+1&!)''(!+*,'%*-'-.%' %.#!+ *) $"<% $ .%, ")+  ")+ !%&")!)'#C!)D*)!+'(!*'C$%&!)$%-*)1'(!'B*)1%+*)")-!(*," !"#$##B!+


) #  5H+EIEEEEEIEEH

>H'( *% 5A B! (!#+ '("' '(! 
 +!, )' %!!& '&.)*-* "##*-!),*)1")+,"$!'C%!1.#"'*)$))-),!),."#'B*)1  !%"'*), B(!) " &.)*-* "#*'C "-', ", " &"%9!'

 



 "%'*-* ")' /.' +!, %!!& ' '(B*'(*)'(*,)"%%B!J-! '*))'("'-)'%#,'(!+*, ,*'*)B! "$$*%& '(! D.+1&!)' $ '(! +!)D*)*)1'(!*'C;,!)$%-!&!)'
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

______________________ 

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC,

Appellee

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2020-2281

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

IPR2019-00209, IPR2019-01280. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San 

Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

DANIEL C. CALLAWAY, SUSHILA CHANANA. 

Case: 20-2281 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2022
 PHILIP WANG, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by C. JAY CHUNG,

PAUL ANTHONY KROEGER, REZA MIRZAIE, JAMES S. TSUEI. 

 WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE,

MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 15, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-2281 Document: 62 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2022
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Finds Performance 'Acceptable' at River Bend in Latest Review

----

----

RIV: 99-19 April 8, 1999

 

**NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE 'ACCEPTABLE' AT RIVER BEND IN LATEST REVIEW**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains acceptable in the NRC's latest plant performance review at River Bend Station, a nuclear power plant near St. Francisville, Louisiana.

Officials of NRC and Entergy Operations Inc. will discuss the review during a meeting set for Tuesday, April 20, at 1 p.m. in the plant training center auditorium. The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials, and members of the public.

In a letter to Entergy Vice President Randall K. Edington NRC Branch Chief Charles S. Marschall said, "Overall, performance of the River Bend staff during the assessment period was acceptable." Operators displayed skill during routine plant maneuvers, and good maintenance practices were responsible for the generally good material condition of the plant. While Engineering and Plant Support areas were generally effective, deficiencies were noted in the radiation work permit program. There were some inconsistencies in individual performance in all areas, and these are the focus of the plant's corrective action program. Performance during this period does not warrant any additional inspection effort above the core inspection program except for a regional initiative inspection to look at the radiation work permit program.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region IV Office of Public Affairs and the NRC web site.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight plants beginning in June and, if found acceptable, will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Review and Prioritization of Technical Issues Related to Burnup Credit for BWR Fuel (NUREG/CR-7158, ORNL/TM-2012/261)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7158 (PDF - 3.94 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2012**Date Published:** February 2013

**Prepared by:**D. E. Mueller, S. M. Bowman, W. J. Marshall,and J. M. Scaglione

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryManaged by UT-Battelle, LLCOak Ridge, TN 37831-6170

M. Aissa, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code V6061

**Prepared for**:Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report has been prepared to support technical discussion of and planning for future research supporting implementation of burnup credit for boiling-water reactor (BWR) spent fuel storage in spent fuel pools and storage and transport cask applications. The review and discussion in this report are based on knowledge and experience gained from work performed in the United States and other countries, including experience with burnup credit for pressurized-water reactor (PWR) spent fuel. Relevant physics and analysis phenomena are identified, and an assessment of their importance to burnup credit implementation is given. Results from sensitivity studies of some of the key phenomena are presented.

The work presented in this report is primarily a sensitivity study designed to identify and rank phenomena and parameters important to BWR burnup credit methodology. This work is an extension of the work reported in NUREG/CR-7157, *Computational Benchmark for Estimated Reactivity Margin from Fission Products and Minor Actinides in BWR Burnup Credit*, which defines the baseline BWR spent fuel cask model used in this report and provides estimates for the reactivity margin associated with fission products and minor actinides. All calculations supporting this work were performed using the SCALE 6.1 code system with the 238-neutron energy group ENDF/B-VII-based nuclear data library.

Discussion of and recommendations for future work supporting implementation of BWR burnup credit beyond the currently used peak reactivity method are provided. A high priority is recommended for development of guidance for identification and use of axial burnup distribution data, for treatment of axial moderator density distributions, and for treatment of control blade usage during depletion calculations. In addition to these higher priority items, several medium and lower priority items are identified and discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope 

of certain definitions pertaining to unlawful sexual conduct, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1862 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Child Protec3 tion Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF ILLICIT SEXUAL 

5 CONDUCT. 

6 Section 2423(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘a sexual act (as defined in sec9 tion 2246) with’’ and inserting ‘‘any conduct involv10 ing’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘if the sexual act’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘if the conduct’’. 

13 SEC. 3. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF FEDERAL SEX OF14 FENSE. 

15 Section 3559 of title 18, United States Code, is 

16 amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (e)(2)(A)— 

18 (A) by inserting after ‘‘2244(a)(1)’’ the 

19 following ‘‘or 2244(a)(5)’’; 

20 (B) by striking the ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘2423(a)’’; 

21 (C) by striking ‘‘into prostitution’’; and 

22 (D) by inserting ‘‘or 2423(c) (relating to 

23 illicit sexual conduct)’’ before the semicolon at 

24 the end; and 
3 

•HR 1862 EH

1 (2) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ‘‘or 

2 2423(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘, 2423(a), or 2423(c)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1862 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand 

lawful sexual conduct, and for other purposes. the scope of certain definitions pertaining to un-
Exhibit 23.2 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333 – 85290 of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. on Form S-8 of our report dated April24, 2002, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the reconciliation to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-Fof ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD. for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Deloitte& Touche 

 

*T N Soong & Co andDeloitte & Touche (Taiwan) established Deloitte & Touche effective June 1, 2003*

 

Taipei, Taiwan 

The Republic of China 

 

July 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irik P. Sevin, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                      |  |                                                                                       
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |  | 
|April 29, 2004 |  |  |  | By:                                                                                 |  | /s/    Irik P. Sevin
|               |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                      |  | Irik P. Sevin Chief Executive Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 175 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 

Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

AMASH, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. STEWART, Mr. JODY B. HICE of 

Georgia, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

SANFORD, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. OLSON, Mr. BABIN, 

Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. ADERHOLT, and Mr. DUNCAN

of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, Natural Resources, 

the Judiciary, House Administration, Rules, and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 175 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ObamaCare Repeal 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AF5 FORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE HEALTH 

6 CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT 

7 OF 2010. 

8 (a) PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE

9 ACT.—Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Pro10 tection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), 

11 such Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended 

12 or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such 

13 Act had not been enacted. 

14 (b) HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILI15 ATION ACT OF 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of 

16 the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 

17 (Public Law 111–152), such Act is repealed, and the pro18 visions of law amended or repealed by such Act are re19 stored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter K.
Stevenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date:  January 14, 2005

                                                      /S/ Peter K. Stevenson
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Peter K. Stevenson
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Improvements of RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 Models for the CANDU Plant Analysis (NUREG/IA-0189)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0189 (PDF 2.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** October 2000

**Prepared by:** B.D. Chung, W.J. Lee, KAERI Y.S. Bang, KINS

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute P.O. Box 105 Yusung, Daejon, 305-600 KOREA

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety P.O. Box 114 Yuseong-Gu, Taejon, 305-600 KOREA

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to develop a thermal hydraulic auditing analysis code For CANDU reactor by extending the model of current RELAP5/MOD3, which have been used for a long time as an auditing analysis tool of Light Water Reactors (LWR). The major thermal hydraulic phenomena for the key CANDU events and the modeling limitation of the current RELAP5/MOD3 for CANDU applications are based on the previous study oil the applicability of RELAP5 code to the CANDU-type plants. The seven models are improved: the CANDU fuel channel heat transfer model; the horizontal flow regime model; the digital control model; ANS94-4 decay heat model; Moody critical model; motor operative valve model; and pressurizer spray model. The models are improved and developed on generic base, thus, they also could be applicable to PWR. Especially, the plutonium contribution to decay heat can be considered by the ANS94-4 decay heat model. The Moody critical flow model using a heavy water property can provide an additional capability to evaluate the conservative break flow in CANDU system. Simulation of different rate of opening and closing the motor valve is now possible when calculating the liquid relief vale behavior during transient. And the new pressurizer spray model can be used for evaluating the droplet size effect on the condensation. All of those improvements are verified through some assessments with simple conceptual problems and Marviken critical flow test. The new code is based on the RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 gamma version, and written in FORTRAN90 language.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Instructions for Completing Nuclear MaterialTransaction Reports: (DOE/NRCForms 741 and 740M) (NUREG/BR-0006)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
# L_2014271EN.01001401.xml

| 12.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 271/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 271/14

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 962/2014

of 29 August 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pescabivona (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pescabivona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Pescabivona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pescabivona’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pescabivona’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pescabivona’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 August 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Tonio BORG

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 103, 8.4.2014, p. 13.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---