alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          90,196
<SECURITIES>                                       489
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,493
<INVENTORY>                                      3,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,119
<PP&E>                                          49,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,787
<BONDS>                                         13,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          149,079
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       113,728
<OTHER-SE>                                     281,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,473
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
No. 91-6277.

#### Marinez *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Baby A., an Infant, by Mother A., His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v Robert L. M. et al., Defendants. New York State Department of Health et al., Appellants.

[632 NYS2d 1017]

Order affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Frazee, J. All concur, Wesley, J., not participating. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Frazee, J.— Discovery.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis,
#### Angelos P. Romas, Appellant, v George Arena et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[632 NYS2d 992]

Appeal unani*816mously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Laborers Intl. Union v Shevlin-Manning, Inc.,*147 AD2d 977). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.— Dismiss Complaint.) Present — Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas
Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                        |  |                         
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                 |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.               
|                 |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY              
|                 | 
|                 |  | By: KESTREL HEAT LLC (General Partner)
|                 |  |                                       
|February 3, 2010 |  | By:                                    |  | /S/ RICHARD F.
AMBURY   
|                 |  |                                        |  | Richard F. Ambury       
|                 |  |                                        |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|                 |  |                                        |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P. 
|                 |  |                                        |  | Star Gas Finance Company
#### UNITED STATES, appellant, v. MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., et al.

No. 81-546.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Dec. 23, 1982.

The application of the Solicitor General to further extend the stay of the judgment is denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 93389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27688]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20856 and #20857; SEMINOLE TRIBE of FLORIDA 
Disaster Number FL-20017]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Seminole Tribe of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-4844-DR), dated 
November 5, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Milton.

DATES: Issued on November 20, 2024.
    Incident Period: October 5, 2024 through November 2, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: January 6, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: August 5, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Seminole Tribe of Florida, dated November 5, 2024, 
is hereby amended to update the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning October 5, 2024, and continuing through November 2, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-27688 Filed 11-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40226

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN FRANCISCO MATAMOROS-LARA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. V-03-CR-35-2

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Francisco Matamoros-Lara appeals the sentence imposed

under the United States Sentencing Guidelines following his

conviction of concealing and transporting illegal aliens in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. For the first time on appeal,

Matamoros-Lara argues that he was sentenced in violation of his

Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, as set out in Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 04-40226

-2-

Matamoros-Lara’s argument is foreclosed by this court’s

decision in United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th

Cir. 2004)(holding that Blakely does not apply to the federal

sentencing guidelines), petition for cert. filed (July 14, 2004)

(No. 04-5263). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED. Matamoros-Lara’s motion to abate the proceedings in

his case is DENIED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
#### ROBERT POSTEN *vs.*ROBERT HENRY.

A purchaser of land is a privy in estate with the bargainor, and has the right, where necessary, to use the name of the bargainor to effect a recovery in ejectment, and, also, to take possession in his name.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Buncombe County, Special Term, July 1851, his Honor Judge Bailey presiding.

This was trespass for mesne profits. The plaintiff read in evidence the record of a recovery in ejectment.— The declaration contained three .counts upon the several demises of the plaintiff, of Rebecca Posten, and of George W. Jones. At the trial, the issue on the demise of the plaintiff was alone submitted to the jury. The writ of possession recited a recovery on the demise of the plaintiff. — • Under it the sheriff put George *W.*Jones in possession; and afterwards this action was brought. To show a privity of estate between the plaintiff and said Jones, and that the latter had authoi'ity to take possession in the name of the plaintiff, a judgment, execution, and sheriff’s deed were read in evidence, from which it appeared, that the land had been sold by the sheriff, as the property of Posten, and was bought by, and conveyed to, the said Jones. The sale was made in 1844. The deed was executed in 1847.

A deed from the plaintiff to Jones, executed in 1834, was also read in evidence. It is an ordinary deed of bargain and sale, for the consideration of six hundred dollars. At the foot of this deed is a memorandum, that Jones is to have “ full possession” at the death of Rebecca Posten.

The Court was of opinion, that the plaintiff had not made out his case, because there was no evidence of an entry by *340him after the recovery in ejectment. The plaintiff submitted to a non-suit, and appealed.

*N. W. Woodfin,*for the plaintiff.

*J. Baxter*and *Henry,*for the defendant.

Pearson, J.

When this case was before us at August Term, 1850, it was decided against the plaintiff, upon the ground, that no connection had been shown between him and Jones. We think that objection is now fully met by the two deeds, which were read in evidence. By them Jones is made a privy in estate with the plaintiff; and this case is the ordinary one of a purchaser, who brings ejectment, on the demise of the bargainor, to obviate an objection, on account of an adverse possession at the execution of the deed.

The bargainee is a privy in estate, and has the right to use- the name of the bargainor to effect a recovery, and to take possession in his name.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed, and *venire de*novo.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Legend International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report"), the undersigned, Peter James Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

          (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2005

                                            /s/ Peter James Lee
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Peter James Lee
                                            Secretary and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)




                                       36
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1678 

AN ACT 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act concerning the statute of limitations for actions to recover disaster or emergency assistance payments, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1678 EH

1 SECTION 1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 705 of the Robert T. 

3 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 5205) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘Except’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3716(e) of title 31, 

8 United States Code, and except’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘report for the disaster or 

10 emergency’’ and inserting ‘‘report for project 

11 completion as certified by the grantee’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (b)— 

13 (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘report 

14 for the disaster or emergency’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘report for project completion as certified by 

16 the grantee’’; and 

17 (B) in paragraph (3) by inserting ‘‘for 

18 project completion as certified by the grantee’’ 

19 after ‘‘final expenditure report’’. 

20 (b) APPLICABILITY.— 

21 (1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to disaster or 

22 emergency assistance provided to a State or local 

23 government on or after January 1, 2004— 

24 (A) no administrative action may be taken 

25 to recover a payment of such assistance after 

26 the date of enactment of this Act if the action 
3 

•HR 1678 EH

1 is prohibited under section 705(a)(1) of the 

2 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer3 gency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5205(a)(1)), 

4 as amended by subsection (a); and 

5 (B) any administrative action to recover a 

6 payment of such assistance that is pending on 

7 such date of enactment shall be terminated if 

8 the action is prohibited under section 705(a)(1) 

9 of that Act, as amended by subsection (a). 

10 (2) LIMITATION.—This section, including the 

11 amendments made by this section, may not be con12 strued to invalidate or otherwise affect any adminis13 tration action completed before the date of enact14 ment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1678 

AN ACT 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

other purposes. aster or emergency assistance payments, and for statute of limitations for actions to recover disand Emergency Assistance Act concerning the
China Green Energy Industries, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






EXHIBIT 10.1 

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT 

Party A: Jiangsu Best Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. 
Party
B: Changzhou Benshen Bike Co., Ltd. 


Party A has the agreement with Party B based on following
terms:

1. Consider Party B possess over 350 retail stores and annual
sales of 200,000 bikes nationwide, Party A pays Party B RMB 20 million as
compensation: the first RMB 10 million is due on Jan 25, 2011 and the rest is
due on Jan 25, 2012. The compensation covers certain fixed assets and intangible
assets, exclude land and property. 

2. Party A hires Aiguo Zhou as the general manager of its LEV
business sector with RMB 250,000 compensation annually and he will be
responsible for the LEV operations.

3. The deadline for the transaction is Jan 28.

4. The whole liabilities from Party B will be undertaken by
Party B. 

/s/ Jianliang Shi 
____________________ 
On behalf of
Jiangsu Best Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. 


/s/ Aiguo Zhou 
___________________ 
On behalf of
Changzhou Benshen Bike Co., Ltd.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1999

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
Ms. Judith A. EnckRegional AdministratorUnited States Environmental

Protection Agency - Region 2

290 Broadw ay, 26lh Floor

New York, NY 10007-1866Dear Ms. Enck:On October 13,2011 , the Department of Environmental Conservation submitted aninfrastructure assessment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead,

This assessment was required by Clean Air Act sections 1 I 0(a)( I ) and (2) for the October 1 5,

2008 revision to the lead NAAQS. It affirmed that New Yqrk State's air program has thecapability and authority to irnplernent, maintain, and enforce the revised NAAQS.

Because of the non-controversial nature of this State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision and theinability to schedule public hearings before the deadline for submittal, DEC, at the time,

requested parallel processing. Public hearings for this SIP revision were subsequently held onJanuary 17, 18 and 19, 2012, in Long Island City, Albany, and Avon, respectively. Nocomments were presented at any of the hearings, nor were any submitted in writing to DEC.DEC hereby requests approval of the New York State infrastructure assessment for lead.

Enclosed with this letter is the hearing report fbr the three public hearings, as well as proof of

publication of the public notices for these hearings.

Please call me at (51 8) 402-8540 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Enclosures

w/enclosuresR. Werner, EPA, Region 2R. Ruvo, EPA, Region 2

J
No. 91-6218.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Servingthe counties ofClarion:Crawford, Erie, Forest,Lawrence, Mercer, Venango, and Warren

June 13,2014 

# o N 

## COMMISS 

# Northwest

Mr. Michael D. Gormas United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis 1200New Jersey Ave. S.E. Washington, DC 20590 I,,~'
Dear Mr. Gormas: As the Planning Partner for the Northwest Rural Transportation Organization, we support the bid for Essential Air Service that was submitted by Sun Air on May 27,2014 for the Venango County Regional Airport. The poor service and reliability from the current carrier has resulted in a significant number ofpassengers to cease flying from Venango Regional. This is now being exacerbated by the negative press and uncertainly ofthe status ofthe current service. The unreliable service from our current carrier has negatively impacted the ability to maintain or attract business customers. Alarge percentage ofthe market isforced to use other more reliable airports, most notably Pittsburgh. Reliable commercial air.service is an economic driver that is desperately needed 

# inour rt;giop and werespe(;tfully ~~questthat lJSDOT favorably consider Sun Air's proposal. We are confident that the proposed service and the cooperative relationship with Pittsburgh International Airport and the Commonwealth's Bureau,of Aviation i,sapr"lctical solution toincreasing passengi:rJevt;lsabove EASm"inimums'to provide our region with access tothe nation's air, '

. '. .:" .'.' '.

- . - .. .. .. . transportation system. Sincerely,

Sue ,Smith Regional Planning Manager .....

395 Seneca Street 

## I Oil City, PA 16301 

## I p: 814.677.4800 

## I f: 814.677.7663 

## I northwestpa.org
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 757 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-448, K2025-445.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27906 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00113-CV

STEVEN DENNY, Appellant

V.

THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE M.

‘LARRY’ DOSS, JUSTICE, 7TH COURT OF 

APPEALS, PLACE 4, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 251st District Court

of Potter County (109,616-C-CV)

April 30, 2020

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Steven Denny must pay all costs of this 

appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr