alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 10, 2015. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291: 

                    1.                     *Thomas Lee Loonan,*                     Easton, Minnesota; to acquire voting shares of Easton Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of State Bank of Easton, both in Easton, Minnesota.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 21, 2015. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-01270 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 15

April 10, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:   Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

      1).  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

Ladies and gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated April 10, 1997 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries for
the three-month period ended March 29, 1997 and included within the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by
reference in the registration statement referred to above. Pursuant to Rule
436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


                                       17
No. 86-98.

#### Rivera *v.*Minnich.

Sup. Ct. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, *ante,*p. 960.] Motion of Oregon for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument denied.
#### In re Joseph Clifton GAINEY, Jr., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00572-MN.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E. D. Virginia, Newport News Division.

Feb. 10, 1982.

*398Richard W. Hudgins, Hudgins & Neale, Newport News, Va., for debtor.

E. Ralph James, James, Richardson, James, Sawyer & Quinn, Hampton, Va., for First Peninsula Bank & Trust Co.

. MEMORANDUM ORDER

HAL J. BONNEY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor, Joseph Clifton Gainey, Jr., seeks confirmation of his Chapter 13 plan. While no written objection was filed, none is required. Counsel for the First Peninsula Bank & Trust Co. appeared and argued that confirmation was not proper.

Gainey, you see, filed a Chapter 7 [straight] bankruptcy petition on July 22, 1981, and was even granted his discharge on October 30th. The bank, as a mortgage holder on the debtor’s home, was active in that case since Gainey was several months in arrears in his mortgage payments. During the pendency of that case, the bank filed a complaint for relief from stay on August 26th so that it might pursue its rights under the contract. This was settled and dismissed by an order of October 30th wherein Gainey agreed to certain terms to cure the situation.

He did not abide by these.

Indeed, on November 23, 1981, he filed this Chapter 13 petition bringing the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 into play once more.

The Court understands that a debtor has “one[-time] absolute right of conversion of a liquidation case to a reorganization or individual repayment plan case.” 11 U.S.C. § 706(a), Legislative History. However, the Court may not confirm a Chapter 13 plan unless it finds, among other criteria, that it was proposed in good faith. 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(3).

Clearly, the debtor is attempting to put off the creditor and is using bankruptcy law in an effort to do so. He is far behind in both his first and second mortgages. This is abuse of process. It is not good faith. He has received his Chapter 7 discharge and made peace with the bank upon terms to which he agreed. He has paid nothing. He cannot expect to enjoy the property carte blanche.

It is ORDERED that confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan be, and it hereby is, denied, with prejudice.
## EPA Reg. No. 10466-31
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff, vs. The State, Defendant.

*November 13, 1926*

March *9, 1927.*

This case is ruled by *New York Life Ins. Co. v. State, ante,*p. 404.

This is an original action against the State brought by the *Mutual Life Insurance Company of Nezy York*to recover a portion of the license fees paid by it as a foreign corporation in order to secure a license,to do business in Wisconsin. Plaintiff made a motion for judgment on the pleadings and on an agreed state of facts.

*Motion denied.*

For the plaintiff there was a brief by *Miller, Mack & Fairchild*of Milwaukee, attorneys, ánd *Frederick L. Allen*of New York City', of counsel, and a reply brief by *Miller, Mack & Fairchild,*and oral argument by /. *G. Hard grove*of Milwaukee.

For the defendant there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *T. L. McIntosh,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. McIntosh.*

The following opinion was filed December 7, 1926:

Stevens, J.

While the facts in this case are not identical with those presented in the case of *New York Life Insurance Co. v. State, ante,*p. 404, 211 N. W. 288, the case presents identically the same questions of law that were held to be controlling in that case.

*By the Court.*— The motion of the plaintiff for judgment is denied without costs. The plaintiff to pay the fees of the clerk of this court.

Eschweiler, J., dissents in part.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, ■ on March 9, 1927. ■ ■
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 779 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-480, K2025-477.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27955 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32

Exhibit 32  Certification of Periodic Financial Report

James C. Holly and Kenneth R. Taylor
hereby certify as follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Sierra Bancorp.

2. The Form 10-K of Sierra Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2008 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Bancorp.



|               |  |                                                   
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|March 12, 2009 |  | /s/ James C. Holly                                
|Date           |  | James C. Holly                                    
|               |  | President & Chief Executive Officer               
|               | 
|March 12, 2009 |  | /s/ Kenneth R. Taylor                             
|Date           |  | Kenneth R. Taylor                                 
|               |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC, Vermont Yankee to Discuss Apparent Violations Found by Special Inspectionof Plant's Design, Configuration

----

----

I-98-21

February 26, 1998

**NRC, VERMONT YANKEE TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS FOUND BY SPECIAL INSPECTION OF PLANT'S DESIGN, CONFIGURATION**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant on Monday, March 2, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements involving, among other things, a failure to promptly and adequately address problems at the Vernon, Vt., facility.

The predecisional enforcement conference is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region 1 office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for observation.

An NRC architect/engineer team conducted a special inspection between September 29 and November 20 at the plant, which is owned and operated by the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation. The objective was to review the plant's design and configuration, as well as its conformance with the utility's safety analysis report.

Based on that inspection, the NRC found multiple apparent infractions, including: several examples of failure to maintain control of the plant's design process; inadequate corrective actions to deal with conditions adverse to quality; and a failure to report to the NRC when the facility was being run in a manner contrary to the plant's operational blueprint.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

NICHOLE E. HUMES, A/K/A

NICHOLE ELIZABETH TULISZEWSKI :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 30 48 D isciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 53 DB 2024

(Supreme Court of Illinois, M.R. 032079)

Attorney Registration No. 203709

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of July , 2024

, having failed to respond to a Notice and

Order directing her to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline,

Nichole E. Humes, a/k/a Nichole Elizabeth Tuliszewski, is suspended from the practice

of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvani a for a period of six months . She shall comply

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Karl Schneider, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2003 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      | /s/ Karl Schneider |   |
|                      | Karl Schneider |
|                      | Vice President, Finance and |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Stantec Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the
Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Daniel J. Lefaivre, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                         |  |  |  |                                                    |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:  February 26, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel J. Lefaivre                             |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | DANIEL J. LEFAIVRE, FCMA                           |  | 
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of A M Marketing,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 15, 2005                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3 Subcooled Boiling Model Assessment (NUREG/IA-0025)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0025 (PDF 1.81 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1998

**Prepared by:** A.S. Devkin and A.S. Podosenov

Nuclear Safety Institute Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" Kurchatov Square, 1 123182, Moscow Russia

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the assessment of the RELAP5/Mod3 (5m5 version) code subcooled boiling process model, which is based on a variety of experiments. The accuracy of the model is confirmed for a wide range of regime parameters for the case of uniform heating along the channel. The condensation rate is rather underpredicted, which may lead to considerable errors in void fraction behavior prediction in subcooled boiling regimes for nonuniformly or unheated channels.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Order filed July 30, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00506-CV

____________

MICHAEL REEVES, Appellant

V.

CENTRAL HOUSTON NISSAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-55206

O R D E R

The reporter’s record has not been filed. The court reporter notified this court 

that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and 

is not appealing as indigent.

When he filed his original petition in the trial court, appellant also filed a 

statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. “A party who files a 

Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay 

costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). 

“Costs” includes fees charged by the court reporter for preparation of the appellate 
2

record. Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(c). 

No contest to appellant’s statement appears in the clerk’s record, and we have 

not received an order requiring appellant to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. 

Appellant is therefore permitted to proceed without payment of costs in the trial 

court.

Accordingly, the official court reporter for the 113th District Court is ordered 

to file the reporter’s record by August 30, 2019. 

PER CURIAM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against a 10% Load Rejection Transient from 75% Steady State in the Vandellós II Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG/IA-0109, UNID–91–08)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0109 (PDF 1.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1993

**Prepared by:** C. Llopis, Asociación Nuclear Vandellós J. Perez, Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear A. Casals, Asociación Nuclear Vandellós R. Mendizabal, Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear

Asociación Nuclear Vandellós c/Travesera de Les Corts 39–43.–08028 Barcelona Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear c/Justo Dorado 11.–28040–Madrid

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN) and the Asociación Nuclear Vandellós have developed a model of Vandellos II Nuclear Power Plant. The ANV collaboration consisted in the supply of design and actual data, the cooperation in the simulation of the control systems and other model components, as well as in the results analysis.

The obtained model has been assessed against the following transients occurred in plant:
> 
 - A trip from the 100% power level (CSN) - A load rejection from 100% to 50% (CSN) - A load rejection from 75% to 65% (ANV) - A feedwater turbopump trip (ANV) 

This copy is a report of the load rejection from 75% to 65% transient simulation. This transient was one of the tests carried out in Vandellós II NPP during the startup tests.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021