alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 19-030 June 28, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Announces Locations for Public Meetings on Community Advisory Boards

Associated with Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the general locations for public 

meetings to be held this summer and fall to receive public input regarding best practices for 

community advisory boards associated with decommissioning nuclear power plants. Additional 

details about each meeting, including dates and specific locations, will be announced at a later time.

The Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act, signed into law in January, 

included, among other things, a requirement that the NRC submit a report to Congress on best 

practices for community advisory boards associated with nuclear power plants. The act requires the 

NRC to hold a minimum of 10 public meetings in locations that ensure geographic diversity across 

the United States, with priority given to states that request a public meeting and have a nuclear 

power reactor currently decommissioning. The NRC staff sought public comment in March on 

where to hold these meetings.

The meetings will be held near the following 11 nuclear power plants, listed alphabetically; 

Crystal River (Florida), Diablo Canyon (California), Humboldt Bay (California), Indian Point (New 

York), Kewaunee (Wisconsin), Oyster Creek (New Jersey), Palisades (Michigan), Pilgrim 

(Massachusetts), San Onofre (California), Vermont Yankee (Vermont) and Zion (Illinois). The staff 

will also conduct a webinar for people in other parts of the country to provide comments. The 

meetings will be held from August through October.

The results of these meetings, along with data received as a result of the NRC’s other 

information collection activities, will be summarized in a best practices report to be submitted to 

Congress by July 14, 2020. The contents of this report will include:

• A description of topics that could be brought before a community advisory board; 

• How a board’s input might inform the decision-making process of stakeholders for 

various decommissioning activities; 

• How a board might interact with the NRC and other federal agencies to promote 

dialogue between the licensee and affected stakeholders; 

• How a board might offer opportunities for public engagement throughout all phases of 

decommissioning;
Page | 2

• A discussion of the composition of community advisory boards; and

• Best practices relating to the establishment and operation of such boards, including 

logistical considerations, frequency of meetings, the process for the selection of board 

members, etc.

More information about the meetings, including dates and venues, will be posted on the 

NRC’s website and published in the Federal Register.
No: II-19-009 March 26, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Performance of Oconee Nuclear Power Station 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 4 to provide 

information and answer questions about the safety performance of the Oconee nuclear power plant,

including the recent annual assessment letter covering all of 2018.

The open house will run from 6-7 p.m. at the Oconee plant’s World of Energy, 

7812 Rochester Highway, Seneca, S.C. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the 

resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available at the open house.

The three-unit Oconee plant, operated by Duke Energy, is about 30 miles west of Greenville, 

S.C.

The NRC concluded that the Oconee plant operated in a manner that preserved public health 

and safety during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection findings and performance indicators were 

green or of low safety significance. As a result, the three Oconee units remain under the NRC’s normal 

level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance

indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight.

Inspections are performed by the NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from the

NRC Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter, which includes upcoming inspection plans for the plant, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Oconee Unit 1, Unit 2, and Unit 3

is also on the website and is updated on a quarterly basis.
Exhibit 13

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Tan Ho Chen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company), and Hank Han-Chao Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 26, 2006



By:

/s/ Tan Ho ChenName:

Tan Ho ChenTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Hank Han-Chao WangName:

Hank Han-Chao WangTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 90-6425.

#### Mathews *v.*United States.

C. A. *5th*Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee: Notice 
of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Healthcare Infection Control 
Practices Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Human Services, 
has been renewed for a 2-year period through January 19, 2017.
    For information, contact Jeffrey Hageman, M.H.S., Executive 
Secretary, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, 
Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Mailstop A35, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-4951 or fax 
404/639-2647.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-01381 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# Millstone 1 Owner to Update NRC on Search for Missing Spent Fuel Rods

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
#### Aaron Marshall, *v.*Jesse Lester.

From Surry.

judgment given by a Justice of the Peace, or other inferior trii,,... nal, from which an appeal hath been prayed and granted, rcuabit no longer a judgment, and cannot be sued on as such.

This was an action of debt founded on two judgments recovered before a Justice of the Peace, from which the Defendant had appealed to the County Court, and given security as the act of Assembly directs, for prosecuting the *appeals;*but the appeal# had not been returned to the County Court. On the trial, the Court nonsuited the. Plaintiff, and he appealed.

Haxu, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The question is whether two judgments rendered by a Justice of the Peace really liad that character at tin-time thus action was commenced. Tliclaw gives to every person the right of appealing from the judgment of a tain in their possession the negro which they liad taken, *228Justice, upon praying it and giving security. This wap done in the case of these two judgments, and from that moment, they ceased to be judgments. Alter an appeal |¡)e case goes *t0*|;iie c0Unty Court, where there is *a,*new trial and a new judgment given *;*and it is the duty of the Justice to transmit it to the County Court for that purpose. The laws feited of suits brought on judgments, after writs of error obtained, tip not apply. The casein too plain for a doubt. The rule for setting aside the nonsuit must be discharged.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing, February 6, 2015, in Pasadena, California. Announcements for this meeting were previously published in 79 FR 48250 and 79 FR 72702.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: January 22, 2015.

Jonathan C. Rose,

Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01518 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
# L_2014292EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 292/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1051/2014

of 2 October 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pomelo de Corse (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Pomelo de Corse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Pomelo de Corse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (2).

Official Journal of the European Union

2

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pomelo de Corse’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pomelo de Corse’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pomelo de Corse’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

3

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 125, 26.4.2014, p. 15.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Marinette County Highway Committee, Respondent, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Defendants: West, Appellant.

*March 18*—

April *12, 1938.*

*561For the appellant there was a brief by *Evrard & Evrard*of Green Bay, and oral argument by *Raymond E. Evrard*and *Francis L. Evrard.*

*S. E. Eastman,*special assistant to the district attorney of Marinette county, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

We agree with the learned trial court that the evidence does not show who was the employer of defendant West at the time of his injury. The method of payment for his services does somewhat obscure the controlling entity, described as employer. There was apparently some interchange between the county of Marinette and the state involving West’s services. But in the proceedings before the commission, neither the state nor the county, either of which may or may not have been the employer, was a party and neither is here a party to the record. This doubtless accounts for failure to litigate the important issue of whose employee West was at the time of injury.

Defendant, acting without advice of counsel, made his claim against a committee of the county. Simple as these matters are intended to be, the provisions of law to protect municipal corporations against improper claims cannot be brushed aside, and it is necessary also under the Workmen’s *562Compensation Act to keep within the bounds fixed by the legislature in conducting proceedings which may result in placing heavy financial responsibilities upon an employer. The legislature has included as an employer “the state, each county, . . . and other public or quasi-public corporations therein,” subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, sec. 102.04, Stats. This leaves no room or excuse for an attempt to' reach the employer, whether the state or the county, by proceedings against a mere- committee of such employer. In view of the section of the act referred to and the further provision of sec. 102.17 authorizing the commission upon the filing of an application such as here involved to bring in additional parties by service of a copy of the application, we are of the opinion that a proper procedure under the case now presented is to remand the cause with instructions to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings in accordance with law. *Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial Comm.*208 Wis. 270, 242 N. W. 191; *Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Comm.*222 Wis. 439, 267 N. W. 905.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to remand the case to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings in accordance with law.
1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1729

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * DeAngelo Singletary, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 5, 2010 Filed: August 6, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DeAngelo Singletary appeals following the district court’s 1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a revocati on sentence of 11 months in prison. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking supervised release, see United States v. Edwards , 400 F.3d 591, 592 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam); and we also concl ude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), because the court properly considered relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1) (considerations include history-2- and characteristics of defe ndant), (a)(2)(D) (need to provide treatment in most effective manner), (a)(4)(B) (applicable Guidelines policy statements); see also United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (specific findings on § 3553(a) factors are not needed; all generally required is evidence that district court was aware of relevant factors). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has dulycaused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized and theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that (1) this Report complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.        Date: March 14, 2007 /s/ WAYNE LEE   Wayne Lee   *Chief Financial Officer*        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos Division de Derechos Cililes (Your Rights Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) (NUREG/BR-0458)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0458 (PDF - 302.47 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 2009

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for July 2017

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 26

2. Cases Added to Docket 1

Evergreen Environmental Services, LLC

No. 16-1295

Direction for Review 7/17/17

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 27
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Euticals, 
Inc.

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Euticals, Inc. applied to be registered as a manufacturer of 
certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants 
Euticals, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of those controlled 
substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated June 10, 2014, and published 
in the Federal Register on June 17, 2014, 79 FR 34554, Euticals, Inc., 
2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, applied to be 
registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled 
substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice.
    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Euticals, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled 
substances is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's 
maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and 
testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the 
company's background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled Substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Oripavine (9330)...........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution and sale to its customers.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01307 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
No. 86-781.

No. 86-793.

#### Kansas Gas & Electric Co. *v.*State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al.; and Kansas City Power & Light Co. *v.*State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al.

Appeals from Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of Edison Electric Institute for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.

Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these cases.

Reported below: 239 Kan. 483, 720 P. 2d 1063.