Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 4539 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 44740 

(August 1, 2014). 

2See Letter from the petitioners to the 

Department, dated August 27, 2014, at 1–2. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

58729 (September 30, 2014). 

4See Letter from the petitioners, dated December 

16, 2014, at 2. 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 43391 (July 25, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results). 

2See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2012–2013 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Phone Call with 

Counsel for Kangtai,’’ (July 30, 2014), denying 

Kangtai’s request for an additional questionnaire 

Continued 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1785. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2014, the Department 

published the notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on brass sheet 

and strip from Japan for the period of 

review August 1, 2013, through July 31, 

2014.1 On August 27, 2014, Global Brass 

and Copper Holdings, Inc., dba Olin 

Brass, Heyco Metals, Inc., Aurubis 

Buffalo, Inc., PMX Industries, Inc., and 

Revere Copper Products, Inc. 

(collectively, the petitioners) requested 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of the following 

22 exporters/producers: (1) Dowa Metals 

& Mining Co., Ltd.; (2) Fujisawa Co., 

Ltd.; (3) Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Harada Metal Industry; (5) Hitachi 

Alloy, Ltd., (6) Hitachi Cable, Ltd.; (7) 

JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corp.; (8) 

Kicho Shindosho Co., Ltd.; (9) Kitz 

Metal Works Corp.; (10) Kobe Steel, 

Ltd.; (11) Mitsubishi Electric Metecs 

Co., Ltd.; (12) Mitsubishi Materials 

Corp.; (13) Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., 

Ltd.; (14) Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., 

Ltd. (Mitsui Kinzoku); (15) Mitsui 

Sumitomo Metal Mining Brass & Copper 

Co., Ltd.; (16) NGK Insulators (NGK 

Metals); (17) Ohki Brass & Copper Co., 

Ltd.; (18) Sambo Copper Alloy Co., Ld.; 

(19) Sugino Metal Industry Co., Ltd.; 

(20) Sumitomo Metal Mining Brass & 

Copper Co., Ltd.; (21) Uji Copper & 

Alloy Co., Ltd.; and (22) YKK 

Corporation.2 Pursuant to this request, 

and in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department 

published a notice initiating an 

administrative review of the abovementioned companies.3 The petitioners 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review of all 22 

exporters/producers on December 16, 

2014.4

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the 

publication date of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. As 

noted above, the petitioners withdrew 

their request for review of the 22 

exporters/producers within 90 days of 

the publication date of the notice of 

initiation. No other parties requested an 

administrative review of the order. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review in its entirety. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of brass sheet and 

strip from Japan. Antidumping duties 

shall be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

rescission of administrative review. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under an APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 22, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01597 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 25, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

chlorinated isocyanurates (chloro isos) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC).1 The period of review (POR) is 

June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2013. 

This review covers five producers/

exporters: (1) Arch Chemicals (China) 

Co. Ltd. (Arch China); (2) Hebei Jiheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd.(Jiheng); (3) Heze 

Huayi Chemical Co. Ltd. (Heze); (4) 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Kangtai); and (5) Zhucheng Taisheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Zhucheng). Jiheng 

and Kangtai are the two producers/

exporters being individually examined 

as mandatory respondents. We invited 

parties to comment on our Preliminary 

Results. Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we made certain 

changes to our margin calculations for 

Jiheng and Kangtai. The final dumping 

margins for this review are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Cary, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3964 or (202) 482–0176, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 25, 2014, the Department 

published its Preliminary Results. On 

July 30, 2014, the Department extended 

the deadline for the filing of case and 

rebuttal briefs.2 On September 8 and 9, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

4540 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 

and directing interested parties to address this issue 

in their briefs. 

3See ‘‘Eighth Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Order on Chlorinated Isocyanurates 

From the People’s Republic of China: Case Brief of 

Clearon Corp. and Occidental Chemical 

Corporation,’’ (September 8, 2014) (Petitioners’ Case 

Brief); ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China (8th Administrative 

Review): Case Brief,’’ (September 8, 2014) (Jiheng’s 

Case Brief); and, ‘‘Certain Chlorinated Isocyanurates 

From the People’s Republic of China Case Brief,’’ 

(September 9, 2014)(Kangtai’s Case Brief). 

4See ‘‘Rebuttal Brief in the Administrative 

Review on Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ (September 18, 

2014)(Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief); ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China 

(8th Administrative Review): Rebuttal Brief,’’ 

(September 17, 2014)(Jiheng’s Rebuttal Brief); and, 

‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s 

Republic of China Rebuttal Brief,’’ (September 17, 

2014)(Kangtai’s Rebuttal Brief). 

5See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ 

(October 16, 2014). 

6See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ 

(December 8, 2014). 

7See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘Public Hearing in the 

Matter of: Administrative Review Under the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ (December 15, 2014). 

8See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s 

Republic of China; 2012–2013,’’ issued 

concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum) for a complete description of the 

scope of the Order. 

9On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

10See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

11See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 

2011–2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ (July 17, 2014) at 3– 

6. 

12See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2011–2012; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 79 FR 4875, 4876 (January 30, 2014) 

(Seventh Review). 

13See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

2014, Clearon Corporation and 

Occidental Chemical Corporation 

(collectively, Petitioners), Jiheng, and 

Kangtai each submitted a case brief.3 On 

September 18 and 19, 2014, Petitioners, 

Jiheng, and Kangtai each submitted a 

rebuttal brief.4

On August 25, 2014, Kangtai 

submitted a hearing request to address 

issues raised in their case and rebuttal 

briefs. On October 16, 2014, the 

Department extended the deadline for 

the final results in this administrative 

review until December 22, 2014.5 On 

December 8, 2014, we fully extended 

the deadline for these final results until 

January 21, 2015.6 We held a public 

hearing on December 4, 2014.7

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

chlorinated isos, which are derivatives 

of cyanuric acid, described as 

chlorinated s-triazine triones. 

Chlorinated isos are currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, 

2933.69.6050, 3808.40.50, 3808.50.40 

and 3808.94.5000 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

issues that parties raised and to which 

we responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum follows as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’).9 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and to all parties in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://trade.gov/

enforcement/frn/index.html. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we have made revisions to the 

margin calculations for Jiheng and 

Kangtai.10

Separate Rates 

In our Preliminary Results, we 

determined that Arch China, Heze, and 

Zhucheng each demonstrated their 

eligibility for separate rates status.11 We 

have not received any information since 

the issuance of the Preliminary Results 

that provides a basis for reconsideration 

of this determination. Therefore, the 

Department continues to find that Arch 

China, Heze, and Zhucheng are each 

eligible for separate rate status. 

Final Results 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percentage) 

Arch Chemicals 

(China) Co. Ltd.* ... 53.15 

Hebei Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd. .......... 0.00 

Juancheng Kangtai 

Chemical Co., Ltd. 0.00 

Heze Huayi Chemical 

Co. Ltd.* ................ 53.15 

Zhucheng Taisheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd.* 53.15 

* For these final results, we determine that 

the application of the separate rate from the 

Seventh Review to the non-examined separate rate respondents is consistent with our 

past practice and a reasonable method to determine the separate rate in the instant review 

because both of our mandatory respondents 

received zero margins and none of the separate rate companies has its own calculated 

rate from the segment immediately prior to the 

instant segment. Pursuant to this method, we 

are assigning the rate of 53.15 percent to the 

non-examined separate rate respondents in 

the instant review.12

Assessment Rates 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries covered by 

this review. The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of these 

final results of this review. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

we are calculating importer- (or 

customer-) specific assessment rates for 

the merchandise subject to this review. 

For any individually examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will 

calculate importer-specific assessment 

rates on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

importer’s examined sales and the total 

entered value of sales.13 We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate is above de 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Notices 4541 

14See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment in NME 

Antidumping Proceedings). 

15For an explanation on the derivation of the 

PRC-wide rate, see Notice of Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China, 

70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 37289 

(July 1, 2014). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

51548 (August 29, 2014) (Initiation Notice). 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

non-market economy (NME) cases. 

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of 

this practice, see Assessment in NME 

Antidumping Proceedings.14

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act): (1) For the exporter’s 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, a zero cash 

deposit rate will be required for that 

company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing producer/

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the PRC-wide rate of 285.63 

percent; 15 and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed regarding these final results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in this 

proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and that subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 21, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Selection of Surrogate Country 

Comment 2: Surrogate Value Selection 

A. Chlorine 

B. Hydrogen 

C. Financial Ratios 

Comment 3: Whether the Department Is 

Authorized by Law To Apply the 

Alternative Methodology Under Section 

777A(d)(1)(B) of the Act to Annual 

Reviews 

Comment 4: Methodological Issues 

A. Value-Added Tax (VAT) Adjustment for 

Kangtai’s and Jiheng’s U.S. Sales 

B. Downstream By-Product Offset for 

Ammonium Sulfate 

C. Recalculating Jiheng’s Hydrogen ByProduct Offset 

D. Calculation of Jiheng’s Electricity Rates 

Comment 5: Ministerial Errors 

A. Double-Counting of Chlorine Input 

B. Calculation of Jiheng’s Market Economy 

Brokerage and Handling Charges 

C. Double-Counting of Jiheng’s Market 

Economy Brokerage and Handling 

Charges in Both Domestic and 

International Movement Expenses 

[FR Doc. 2015–01604 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Hargett or George McMahon 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4161 or (202) 482–1167, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2014, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain pasta 

from Italy.1 Pursuant to requests from 

interested parties, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of initiation of this antidumping 

duty administrative review with respect 

to the following companies for the 

period July 1, 2013, through June 30, 

2014: Pastificio Andalini S.p.A. 

(Andalini), Dalla Costa Alimentare SRL. 

(Dalla Costa), Delverde Industrie 

Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde), La 

Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana), Rummo, 

S.p.A. (Rummo), and Pasta Lensi S.r.L. 

(Pasta Lensi).2 On October 10, 2014, and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES