alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1719 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 acres 

of land in Martinez, California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2017 

Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. POLIS, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. MATSUI, 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. 

BEYER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. SPEIER, and 

Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 acres of land in Martinez, California, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Muir National 

5 Historic Site Expansion Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1719 IH

1 SEC. 2. JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE LAND ACQUI2 SITION. 

3 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

4 acquire by donation the approximately 44 acres of land, 

5 and interests in such land, that are identified on the map 

6 entitled ‘‘John Muir National Historic Site Proposed 

7 Boundary Expansion’’, numbered 426/127150, and dated 

8 November, 2014. 

9 (b) BOUNDARY.—Upon the acquisition of the land 

10 authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior 

11 shall adjust the boundaries of the John Muir Historic Site 

12 in Martinez, California, to include the land identified on 

13 the map referred to in subsection (a). 

14 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The land and interests in 

15 land acquired under subsection (a) shall be administered 

16 as part of the John Muir National Historic Site estab17 lished by the Act of August 31, 1964 (Public Law 88– 

18 547; 78 Stat. 753; 16 U.S.C. 461 note). 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Implementation of the Control Rod Movement Option by means of Control Variables in RELAP5/PARCS v2.7 Coupled Code (NUREG/IA-0402)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0402 (PDF - 1.18 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2013**Date Published:** July 2014

**Prepared by:** R. Miró1, P. Ana1, T. Barrachina1, J. C. Martínez-Murillo2, C. Pereira3, G. Verdú

1Institute for Industrial, Radiophysical and Environmental Safety (ISIRYM) Universitat Politècnica de València Camí de Vera, s/n 46022 Valencia, SPAIN

2Almaraz-Trillo AIE Av Manoteras 46Bis 28050 Madrid, SPAIN

3Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear Unversidade Federal de Mina Gerais Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, BRAZIL

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The objective of this work is to introduce an improvement in best estimate coupled neutronic thermalhydraulic 3D codes simulations, by adding a model for the control rod movement in the coupled code RELAP5/PARCS v2.7, by means of control variables, with the aim of being able to dynamically analyze asymmetric transient accidents, as the reactivity insertion accidents (RIA) in a nuclear reactor, reproducing all the reactors control systems.

The modification developed in this work permits the automatic movement of the control rods, activated by the RELAP5 code control system, and also they can depend on signals related to the reactor reactivity, like pressure, fuel temperature or moderator temperature, etc., improving the realism of the calculation and increasing the simulation capabilities.

This report was prepared by the Nuclear Engineering Group belonging to the Institute for Industrial, Radiophysical and Environmental Safety (ISIRYM) at the Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), which collaborates in the simulation area with the Spanish company Centrales Nucleares Almaraz-Trillo (CNAT). The Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA, Electric Industry Association of Spain), equivalent to the American EPRI sponsored this work.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adoptedpursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 5, 2006
EXHIBIT 99
                           ==========

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
---------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of eXmailit.com (Registrant)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
M. Kevin Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.


Date: March 27, 2003        /s/ M. Kevin Ryan
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer of
                              eXmailit.com, Registrant
#### In the Matter of Joy H. and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Broome County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Denise H., Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 200]

White, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered June 9, 1994, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to, *inter alia,*adjudicate respondent’s children to be permanently neglected, and terminated her parental rights.

Since October 21, 1990, respondent’s two children, then ages 27 months and *2lh*months, have been in petitioner’s custody. On January 6, 1994, respondent admitted many of the allegations set forth in the permanent neglect petition dated March 31, 1993, and stipulated to the entry of an order adjudicating the children permanently neglected. After a dispositional hearing, Family Court concluded that the best interests of the children required that they be freed for adoption and terminated respondent’s parental rights. Respondent appeals contending that petitioner had failed to make a diligent effort to assist, develop and encourage the parental relationship.

It was not improper for Family Court, within its fact-finding order, to rely upon respondent’s admissions and stipulations which specifically included that petitioner had made diligent efforts to assist, develop and encourage the parental relationship and itemized those efforts (see, *Matter of Noele D.,*209 AD2d 828, 829; *Matter of Patricia O.,*175 AD2d 870, 871; *see also, Matter of Geraldine Rose W.,*196 AD2d 313, 317). Contrary to respondent’s contention, the hearing held on March 30, 1994 was the beginning of the dispositional hearing and was not the fact-finding hearing.

Our review of the record discloses that respondent failed to complete her alcohol rehabilitation programs, failed to attend counseling sessions ordered by Family Court, missed half of her scheduled visitations with her children and failed to make plans for the return of the children, despite the diligent efforts of petitioner up to the dispositional determination. We find no basis to disturb the court’s determination to terminate respondent’s parental rights. Respondent has been unable or unwilling to take steps to correct the conditions which led to *762the removal of the children and to provide them with an adequate stable home *(see, Matter of Nathaniel T.,*67 NY2d 838).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Improvements and Validation of the System Code TRACE for Lead and Lead-Alloy Cooled Fast Reactors Safety-Related Investigations (NUREG/IA-0421)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0421 (PDF - 3.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** January 2013**Date Published:** February 2013

**Prepared by:** Wadim Jaeger, Victor Hugo Sanchez Espinoza

Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report deals with the validation of the system code TRACE related to lead and lead-alloy cooled nuclear systems. This validation process made in necessary to revise routines of the TRACE source code in order to make lead as a coolant available, and to add functions for heat transfer in bundles cooled with liquid metals. Several experimental as well as theoretical benchmarks were selected to test, on the one hand side, the existing physical models related to liquid metals, and, on the other hand side, the new implemented functions and routines. The results for the different investigations are in good agreement to the experimental data or the other codes. The present analysis showed that the revision of the TRACE models was necessary and that the changes yield better results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3982-3983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Lin Zhi 
International, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Lin Zhi International, Inc., applied to be registered as a 
manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA 
grants Lin Zhi International, Inc. registration as a manufacturer of 
those controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated May 28, 2014, and published 
in the Federal Register on June 4, 2014, 79 FR 32321, Lin Zhi 
International, Inc., 670 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94085, 
applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of 
controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this 
notice.
    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Lin 
Zhi International, Inc. to manufacture the basic classes of controlled

[[Page 3983]]

substances is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's 
maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and 
testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the 
company's background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
as bulk reagents for use in drug abuse testing.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01305 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC to Hold Three Additional Public Meetings in Nevada on Proposed Regulations for Yucca Mountain

----

----

No. 99-108 May 24, 1999

**NRC TO HOLD THREE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC MEETINGS IN NEVADA ON PROPOSED REGULATIONS FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold three public meetings in Nevada next month to provide an additional opportunity for comment on its proposed new regulations for making a decision on whether or not to license a possible future high-level radioactive waste repository that the Department of Energy (DOE) may seek to develop at Yucca Mountain.

The proposed regulations were issued on February 22, with comments requested by May 10. The NRC held two public meetings in Nevada on March 23 and 25 to discuss the proposal. In response to comments at those meetings, and written comments, the agency extended the public comment period until June 30.

Details of the new series of public meetings are:

-- Tuesday, June 15, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at the Amargosa Valley Community Center in Amargosa Valley.

-- Wednesday, June 16, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at the Richard Tam Alumni Center of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

-- Thursday, June 17, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Caliente City Hall, Caliente.

The meetings will open with an NRC presentation on the proposed rule, which would establish the criteria and standards against which NRC would evaluate a possible future DOE license application for a repository at Yucca Mountain.

This presentation will be followed by public discussion, facilitated by Francis X. Cameron, NRC Counsel for Public Liaison.

The NRC will consider comments received at the meeting in developing the final version of the proposed rule. Interested persons are also invited to send written comments on the proposed rule by June 30 to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Alternatively, comments may be submitted via the NRC's interactive rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1997 FORM 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             243
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,875
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,678
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         49,622
<ALLOWANCE>                                        222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,068
<DEPOSITS>                                      47,999
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                557
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  65,068
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,038
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  683
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,722
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,896
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,825
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    604
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         376
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.85
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       143
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  222
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 1998
(Unaudited) and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine months
ended March 31, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,271
<PP&E>                                       2,463,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,837,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,084,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,985,695
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,231,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,837,995
<SALES>                                        645,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,133
<CGS>                                          260,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,069,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (424,767)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (424,767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.009)
        

</TABLE>
On petitioner’s petition for reconsideration of order dismissing appeal filed April 15, 1983, motion to dismiss filed December 28,1982 and allowed March 16,1983,

petition for reconsideration granted, former order withdrawn and motion to dismiss denied September 14, 1983

#### PACIFIC CITY SANITARY DISTRICT, *Respondent, v.*McKEE, *Appellant.*

(21-278; CA A25169)

669 P2d 330

John H. Tuthill, Johnson, Hantke & Tuthill, Tillamook, for petition.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.

WARDEN, J.

*502WARDEN, J.

Defendant petitions this court for reconsideration of the order dismissing his appeal. ORAP 10.10. Plaintiff brought this action, alleging that defendant had failed to connect a building sewage facility to plaintiff’s public sewer system. Plaintiff sought damages, declaratory and injunctive relief and attorney fees, and obtained a default judgment, which was entered December 4,1981.

Defendant moved to set aside the default judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. That motion was denied on April 20,1982. Defendant did not appeal the denial. Defendant then moved to set aside the judgment on the ground of “surprise” under former ORS 18.160.1 The second motion was denied June 11,1982.

Defendant appealed the denial of the second motion. He contended that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to set aside the default judgment. Plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that the June 11,1982, order was not an appealable order under ORS 19.010, because the order of April 20, 1982, barred defendant’s second motion to set the judgment aside under the principle of *res judicata.*This court, by order dated March 16,1983, allowed the motion to dismiss.

We allow the petition for reconsideration to consider what appears to be a question of first impression in Oregon: Did the trial court’s denial of defendant’s first motion to set aside the judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction have a *res judicata*effect on defendant’s second motion based on “surprise”? We conclude that it did not.

In *Office Services Corp. v. CAS Systems, Inc.,*63 Or App 842, 845, 666 P2d 297 (1983), we said:

> “* * * [T]he bar of *res judicata*applies to subsequent lawsuits and not to *separate claims*within the same lawsuit. We need not decide whether there can be exceptions to that general rule, because defendant has not demonstrated why this case might be an exception.”

That language applies in this case, even though it is the plaintiff who has not demonstrated why this case is an exception.

Petition for reconsideration granted; former order withdrawn; motion to dismiss appeal denied.