October 15, 2015

Kenneth Sides

7119 Labrador Ln

Mechanicsville, VA 23111

757.761.1329

kside001@gmail.com

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 1200 New 

Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 

C.F.R. §§ Part 21; 45.23(b); 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.151(a); 

91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (1) (2); 91.417(a)&(b) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I, Kenneth Sides, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, Kenneth Sides, an owner and 

operator of small unmanned aircrafts, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(“FARs”) listed below so that I, Kenneth Sides may operate my small lightweight unmanned 

aircraft system (“UAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration 

(“FAA”). 

I, Kenneth Sides, have over fifteen years of digital photography experience as well as over fifteen

years of experience in the field of Remote Controlled Aircraft. Using the DJI Phantom 3

1

, I, Kenneth 

Sides, intend to provide aerial video and photography services in the areas of building inspections, real 

estate, site surveys, aerial mapping, and special events to include but not limited to weddings, private 

or public parties/events, environmental studies, and other outdoor recreational facilities and 

landscapes. 

1 

Attachment – DJI Phantom 3 Advanced Specifications

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 1 
I, Kenneth Sides, am committed to safety with each flight. My exemption request would permit 

operation of a UAS(s) in areas away from the general public, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic for 

community videos, and within property boundaries for individual homeowner real estate listing 

videos/photos or videos/photos of other similar events. 

I. Contact Information: 

Kenneth Sides

7119 Labrador Lane

Mechanicsville, VA 23111

757.761.1329

kside001@gmail.com

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From Which Kenneth 

Sides Requests Exemption are: 

III. The Extent of Relief Kenneth Sides Seeks and the Reason He Seeks Such Relief: 

I, Kenneth Sides, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the 

procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to request that I, Kenneth Sides, an owner and operator of 

small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below so 

that I may operate my small light weight unmanned aircraft system (“UAS”) commercially in airspace 

regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for 

such integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the 

public’s interest to do so. My, Kenneth Sides’, light-weight UAS meets the definition of “small 

unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the (next page)

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 2 
integration of my lightweight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. The Reform Act guides 

the Secretary in determining the types of UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspace 

system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the UAS's, whether 

the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, whether the UAS will be 

operated by line of sight 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of these items reflect in favor of an exemption for 

me, Kenneth Sides. My UAS utilizes four (4) counter-rotating propellers for balance, control and 

stability and is equipped with a GPS and auto return safety technology. Weighing less than five (5) 

pounds (far below the maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. 

I, Kenneth Sides, will operate the Phantom 3 in a safe manner, using the following checklists as 

well as operating procedures to determine that the aircraft is physically and electronically ready for 

safe flight and that permission from the property owner/representative is received when 

applicable.

Pre-flight Checklist: 

 Survey the property for hazards, such as trees, utility poles/lines and other elements that might 

compromise safe flight including dense vehicular traffic or crowds. If the location is not deemed 

safe, the flight will be aborted immediately.

 Check the weather for wind speed, cloud cover, and any forecast changes that might adversely 

affect flight safety and performance. 

 Closely examine the aircraft, - verifying connections and searching for cracks and loose parts. 

 Verify the electronic elements are performing correctly (receiving 6 or more GPS signals along 

with calibration of the magnetic compass). 

o Determine that the barometric altimeter reflects approximately 0 feet AGL. (Phantom 3 

only)

o Following takeoff, hover at an altitude of approximately 10 feet to assure that the Home 

Point is correctly located. Then exercise all controls to confirm their functionality, if any 

of the controls is not functioning, the flight will be terminated immediately.

 During Flight, the pilot will always:

 Give right-of-way to any manned aircraft

 Stay clear of FAA controlled airspace at airports (generally a five nautical mile 

radius) as well as restricted and prohibited zones. 

 Fly no higher than 400' and no further than 1000' from the Home Point, recognizing that the 

primary responsibility is to safely keep the aircraft safely within VLOS. 

 Stay clear of clouds and fog (500' vertically and 2,000' horizontally).

Post-flight Checklist: 

 Inspect the UAS to determine its physical and electronic condition. Examine the 

aircraft-looking at connections and searching for cracks and loose parts. 

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 3 
IV. How Kenneth Sides’ Request Will Benefit the Public as A Whole: 

Aerial videography and photography has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing 

aircraft and helicopters. For small budget companies and individuals, the expense of such aerial 

videography and photography is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high-income individuals 

can afford to absorb such expense. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the public through potential 

catastrophic crashes resulting in a potential loss of life. My, Kenneth Sides’, UAS poses no such 

threat since size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates any potential threat to the public. Congress 

has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS’ into the 

national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. My, Kenneth Sides, light-weight 

UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. 

V. Reasons Why Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Will Not Adversely Affect Safety Or How the 

Exemption Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To Existing Rule: 

My, Kenneth Sides’, exemption will not adversely affect safety for the following reasons:

 My UAS weighs less than 5 pounds complete with a small light-weight high definition (HD) 

camera. I only operate my UAS below 400 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling 

set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012).

 I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power.

 I pilot my UAS through remote control/FPV only by line of sight.

 My UAS has GPS with a flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if 

communication with the remote control pilot is lost.

 I only operate in reasonably safe environments that are strictly controlled, are away from 

power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas.

 I conduct extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol, during which safety carries primary 

importance.

 I always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operation. 

VI. A Summary the FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: 

A. 14 C.F.R. § 21, 14 C.F.R. § 91 and 91.151: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like 

14 C.F.R. § 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for 

procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a) (1). The 

size, weight and enclosed operational area of my, Kenneth Sides’, UAS permits exemption 

from Part 21 because my UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level of safety pursuant to 

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness 

certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness 

certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, 

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 4 
speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My, 

Kenneth Sides’, current and projected UAS’ meet or exceed each of the elements. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. 

As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation 

is inapplicable. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on 

board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS, this Regulation is inapplicable. An 

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight manual delineating 

areas of where safety can be defined. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this 

regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 

10602, 10700 and 32827. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS utilizes 

electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) with the condition that the PIC does not begin a flight unless (considering 

wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly to the first point of intended 

landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, land the UA with 30% battery power remaining. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carrying of civil aircraft certifications and 

registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent 

level of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and 

registrations by me, Kenneth Sides. 

B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of the Aircraft Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require 

aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. My, Kenneth Sides, UAS is, by definition, 

unmanned. Therefore does not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain 

words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft with 

dimensions smaller that minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, I, Kenneth Sides, will mark the 

UAS in the largest possible lettering by placing the word “EXPERIMENTAL” on its fuselage as 

required by 14 C.F.R. § 45.29 (f) so that I, Kenneth Sides, the pilot, will see the markings. The FAA 

has previously issued exemptions to this regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 

10167A and 10700. 

C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 

61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to noncommercial operations. I, Kenneth Sides, can 

achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because my UAS does 

not carry any 

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 5 
pilots or passengers. Further, while helpful, a pilot license will not ensure remote control 

piloting skills. The risks attended to the operation of my UAS is far less than the risk levels 

inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, et seq. Thus, allowing me, 

Kenneth Sides, to operate my UAS in a manner that meets and exceeds current safety levels 

in relation to 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b). 

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the 

operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. 

My UAS will never operate at an altitude greater than 400 AGL; safely below the standard of 400 

AGL. I, Kenneth Sides, will however operate my UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, 

providing a level of safety at least equivalent to or below those in relation to minimum safe 

altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher 

level of safety will be achieved. 

E. 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (1) & (2); 417 (a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections The 

above-cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to have the 

aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, 

except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in 

part 43 of this chapter. 

These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not, 

therefore, apply to my, Kenneth Sides’, UAS. However, as a safety precaution, I, Kenneth 

Sides, inspect my UAS before and after each flight. 

A Summary the FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 

. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled 

Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness 

certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my 

UAS permit exemption from Part 21 because my, Kenneth Sides’, UAS meets an equivalent level of 

safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the 

airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS’ from the airworthiness certificate 

requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such 

as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. § 

91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate 

will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 

. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or 

passengers, and given the size of the UAS’, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of 

safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this

regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 6 
9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software updates and 

curative measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be 

achieved. 

In summary, Kenneth Sides seeks an exemption from the following Regulations: 

14 C.F.R. § 21, Subpart H; 14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 

C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103 (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 

91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b); 14 C.F.R. § 

91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a) (1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a) (2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 

(a) (1); and, 14 C.F.R. § 91.417 (a) & (b) 

I, Kenneth Sides, am requesting this exemption for the purposes of aerial photography, 

cinematography, videography, inspections and other flight operations. The reason for such a general 

and broad based request is that I, Kenneth Sides, wish to utilize a business strategy that capitalizes 

on opportunities as they may arise in the future. My, Kenneth Sides’, business model is based on the 

idea of offering ad hoc small UAS services to individuals or companies who wish to employ these 

services as a safe, effective, and legal option to enhance their business. 

Granting my, Kenneth Sides’, request for exemption will reduce current risk levels and thereby 

enhance safety. My UAS craft does not contain potentially explosive fuel, is smaller, lighter and more 

maneuverable than conventional video and photographic aircraft. Further, I operate at lower altitudes 

and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to and from established air fields. 

There are no personnel on board my, Kenneth Sides’, UAS and therefore the likelihood of death or 

serious bodily injury is significantly diminished. My, Kenneth Sides’, operation of my UAS, weighing 

less than 5 pounds and travelling at lower speeds within limited areas will provide an equivalent level 

of safety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly I, Kenneth Sides, respectfully request that 

the FAA grant my exemption. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kenneth Sides

Attachments: DJI Phantom 3 Advanced Specifications

Kenneth Sides’ Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Page 7 
54 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Appendix

Appendix

Specifications

Aircraft

Weight (Battery & 

Propellers Included) 1280 g

Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s

Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m

Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS

Gimbal 

Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30°

Vision Positioning

Velocity Range < 8 m/s (2 m above ground)

Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces

Camera

Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens FOV 94° 20mm(35mm format equivalent ) f/2.8

ISO Range 100-3200(video) 100-1600(photo)

Electronic Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s

Image Max. Size 4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single shot

Burst shooting: 3/5/7 frames

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 

Bracketed frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max. capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Video Recording Modes

UHD : 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30 

FHD:1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 

HD:1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Max. Bitrate Of Video 

Storage 60 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature 

Range

0°C to 40°C
© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 55

Appendix

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

Remote Controller 

Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Transmitting Distance 2000 m (Outdoor And Unobstructed)

Video Output Port USB

Operating Temperature Range 0°C- 40°C

Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder Tablets and smartphones 

Transmitter Power(EIRP) FCC: 20 dbm; CE:16 dbm

Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V

Charger

Voltage 17.4 V

Rated Power 100 W 

Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-4480 mAh-15.2 V )

Capacity 4480 mAh

Voltage 15.2 V

Battery Type LiPo 4S

Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g

Operating Temperature -10°C- 40°C

Max. Charging Power 100 W

Aircraft Status Indicator Description

Normal

 Red, Green and Yellow Flash 

Alternatively Turning on and Self-Diagnostics

 Green and Yellow Flash Alternatively Aircraft Warming Up

 Green Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (P-mode with GPS and Vision Positioning)

X2 Green Flashes Twice Safe to Fly (P-mode with Vision Positioning but without GPS)

 Yellow Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (A-mode but No GPS and Vision Positioning)

Warning

 Fast Yellow Flashing Remote Controller Signal Lost

 Slow Red Flashing Low Battery Warning

 Fast Red Flashing Critical Battery Warning

 Red Flashing Alternatively IMU Error 

— Solid Red Critical Error 

 Red and Yellow Flash Alternatively Compass Calibration Required
56 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Appendix

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

Intelligent Flight Mode 

Intelligent Flight mode includes Course Lock, Home Lock, Point of Interest (POI), Follow Me and 

Waypoints features to assist users to create professional shoots during the flight. Course Lock and Home 

Point lock helps to lock the orientation of aircraft so that the user can focus more on other operations. 

Point of Interest, Follow Me and Waypoints mode enable aircraft to fly automatically according to the 

pre-set flight maneuvers.

Course Lock Lock the current nose direction as the aircraft’s forward direction. The aircraft will 

move in the locked directions regardless of its orientation (yaw angle). 

Home Lock Pull the pitch stick backward to move the aircraft toward its recorderd Home Point. 

Point of Interest The aircraft will orbit around the subject automatically to allow the operator can be 

more focus on framing their shoot on the subject in Point of Interest.

Follow Me 

A virtual tether is created between the aircraft and the mobile device so that the 

aircraft can track your movement as you move. Note that Follow Me performance is 

subject to the GPS accuracy on the mobile device. 

Waypoints

Record a flight path, then the aircraft will fly along the same path repeatedly while 

you control the camera and orientation. The flight path can be saved and re-apply 

in the future.

Enable Multiple Flight Mode by launching the DJI GO app > Camera View > > Advanced Settings > 

Mulitple Flight Mode before using the Intelligent Flight Mode for the first time.
© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 57

Appendix

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

FCC Compliance

FCC Compliance

This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions:

(1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and

(2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired 

operation.

Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the 

user's authority to operate the equipment.

Compliance Information

FCC Warning Message

Any changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void 

the user’s authority to operate the equipment. 

This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 

(1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference 

received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.

FCC Radiation Exposure Statement: 

This equipment complies with FCC radiation exposure limits set forth for an uncontrolled environment. 

This equipment should be installed and operated with minimum distance 20cm between the radiator& 

your body. This transmitter must not be co-located or operating in conjunction with any other antenna or 

transmitter. 

Note: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, 

pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against 

harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates uses and can radiate radio 

frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful 

interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in 

a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, 

which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct 

the interference by one or more of the following measures: 

—Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. 

—Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. 

—Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. 

—Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help. 

IC RSS warning

This device complies with Industry Canada licence-exempt RSS standard (s). Operation is subject to the 

following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause interference, and (2) this device must accept any 

interference, including interference that may cause undesired operation of the device.

Le présent areil est conforme aux CNR d'Industrie Canada licables aux areils radio exempts de licence.

L'exploitation est autorisée aux deux conditions suivantes:

(1) l'areil ne doit pas produire de brouillage, et

(2) l'utilisateur de l'areil doit accepter tout brouillage radioélectrique subi, même si le brouillage est 
58 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Appendix

Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

susceptible d'en compromettre le fonctionnement.

IC Radiation Exposure Statement:

This equipment complies with IC RF radiation exposure limits set forth for an uncontrolled environment. 

This transmitter must not be co-located or operating in conjunction with any other antenna or transmitter.

This equipment should be installed and operated with minimum distance 20cm between the radiator& 

your body.

Any Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could 

void the user’s authority to operate the equipment.

KCC Warning Message

“해당무선설비는 운용 중 전파혼신 가능성이 있으므로 인명안전과 관련된 서비스는 할 수 없습니다 .” 

“해당 무선설비는 운용 중 전파혼신 가능성이 있음”

NCC Warning Message

低功率電波輻射性電機管理辦法

第十二條經型式認證合格之低功率射頻電機,非經許可,公司、商號或使用者均不得擅自變更頻率、加

大功率或變更原設計之特性及功能。

第十四條低功率射頻電機之使用不得影響飛航安全及干擾合法通信;經發現有干擾現象時,應改善至無

干擾時方得繼續使用。前項合法通信,指依電信法規定作業之無線電通信。低功率射頻電機須忍受合法

通信或工業、科學及醫療用電波輻射性電機設備之干擾。
© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

The content is subject to change.

Download the latest version from

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3

If you have any questions about this document, please contact DJI by 

sending a message to DocSupport@dji.com.