alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 27, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                       8,201,373
<SECURITIES>                                13,227,968
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,755,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,886
<INVENTORY>                                 14,435,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,486,979
<PP&E>                                       7,534,844
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,096,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,913,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,452,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,186,913
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,264,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,913,793
<SALES>                                     11,120,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,120,345
<CGS>                                        4,751,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,751,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,317,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                   831,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,486,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00185

- CR

G ORDON R AY L EWIS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 355th District

Court

of Hood County ( CR12234 )

March 21, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opin ion

Concurring Memo randum O pinion by

Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECO ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Note to Editors: NRC's ACRS Meeting Scheduled on February 3

----

----

No. 98-05

January 12, 1998

**NOTE TO EDITORS:**

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a meeting on February 3 in Rockville, Maryland, to continue its review of proposed improvements to the senior management meeting process.

The meeting of the Subcommittee on Plant Operations, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/28/2014 17:22:43

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vermont Yankee Docket (050- 00271)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

117

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

117

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

467

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 6
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01518]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy 
Rules Hearing, February 6, 2015, in Pasadena, California. Announcements 
for this meeting were previously published in 79 FR 48250 and 79 FR 
72702.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief 
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of 
the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-
1820.

    Dated: January 22, 2015.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01518 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Mitigating Strategies: Safely Responding to Extreme Events (NUREG/BR-0523)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Overview

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0523 (PDF - 6.89 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**April 2015

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Overview

The March 2011 Fukushima accident underscored how important prior planning is when it comes to safely handling extreme events at a nuclear reactor. The NRC continues to conclude U.S. plants can survive many scenarios, such as loss of offsite power or flooding. After Fukushima, however, the NRC ordered every U.S. commercial reactor to have strategies for dealing with the long-term loss of normal safety systems. Instead of figuring out which events might happen, the order focused on significantly improving the plants' flexibility and diversity in responding to extreme natural phenomena, such as severe flooding and earthquakes.

The plants' strategies must protect or restore key safety functions indefinitely in the case of an accident. The strategies focus on keeping the reactor core cool, preserving the containment's barrier that prevents or controls radiation releases, and cooling the spent fuel pool. Plants with more than one reactor must be able to do this for every reactor on the site at the same time.

The strategies must protect the plant indefinitely, so plants may need to bring in additional equipment or resources. The order reflects this by having three phases with different requirements.

The plants have all submitted a plan for what they intend to do and use in each of these phases. The plans must also explain how the plants will have everything in place by the end of 2016. The NRC reviewed those plans and has issued interim staff evaluations, which let the licensee know whether the NRC thinks the plants are on the right track. The NRC will inspect the plants throughout this process to ensure the strategies will get the job done. The agency website's Japan Lessons Learned section has more information about the mitigating strategy requirements and related guidance.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Pressure and Leak-Rate Tests and Models for Predicting Failure of Flawed Steam Generator Tubes (NUREG/CR-6664)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6664 (PDF - 6.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2000**Date Published:** August 2000

**Prepared by:** S. Majumdar, K. Kasza, J. Franklin

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

J. Muscara, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6487

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes the models used for predicting failure pressures and leak rates in unrepaired steam generator tubes with axial and circumferential cracks that developed under normal operation and design-basis accident conditions. These models are first validated with failure and leak rate tests at room temperature and at 282°C on tubes with well-characterized rectangular EDM notches and are then applied to the failure and leak rate tests conducted on tubes with laboratory-generated outer-diameter stress corrosion cracks (ODSCC), which have highly complex morphology. A procedure for defining equivalent rectangular cracks for SCC cracks on the basis of Eddy Current +PointTM data is presented. Except for tests that exhibited time-dependent initiation and increase of leak rates, the model predictions are in reasonable agreement with test results. In the second half of the report, a model is presented for predicting failure during severe accidents of Electrosleeved* steam generator tubes with axial cracks in the parent tubes. The model is refined on the basis of high-temperature failure test results on Electrosleeved tubes with electro-discharge-machined notches. It is then used to predict failure of Electrosleeved tubes with cracks subjected to postulated severe accident transients.

----

* Electrosleeve is a trademark of Ontario Hydro Technologies, Inc.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of Maanshan Station Blackout Accident and Rescue Procedures under Different Tube Plugging Situations with TRACE (NUREG/IA-0517)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0517 (PDF – 2.50 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2019**Date Published:** January 2020

**Prepared by:** Jung-Hua Yang, Tsung-I Shen, Shao-Wen Chen, Jong-Rong Wang, Chunkuan Shih National Tsing Hua University and Nuclear and New Energy Education and Research Foundation 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., HsinChu, Taiwan

K.Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This research focused on the analysis of URG (Ultimate Response Guideline) procedure and the FLEX (Flexible and Diverse Coping Strategies) strategy after one and four hours when Maanshan nuclear power plant is under station blackout (SBO) accident by using TRACE code. This research then explores the influence on heat transfer between primary side and secondary side when there is a plugged tube in the steam generators of the power plant. The NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute) had proposed a FLEX strategy [1-3] and Taiwan Power Company also has developed URG procedure [4, 5], in order to maintain the safety of plant during a severe disaster. The equipment of plant will become old and deteriorative as time passes by. If there are any problems with the tubes of steam generators, operators will plug the defective tube during outage inspection to prevent them from leaking or bursting. This research uses TRACE to analyze under 2%, 5% and 10% of tube plugging, the effectiveness of the URG procedure and the FLEX strategy used during the SBO accident of Maanshan nuclear power plant. The result shows that even under 10% of tube plugging, the URG procedure and the FLEX strategy won’t be affected by tube plugging and still can bring the plant back to safety.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,103
<SECURITIES>                                    12,240
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,412
<PP&E>                                          11,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,056
<SALES>                                         20,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,523
<CGS>                                           10,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                       332
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51407

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

URIEL SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, also known

as Rafael Diaz-Medina,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1102-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Uriel SanchezSanchez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


     Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the
undersigned, Stephen L. Kibblehouse, the Chief Executive Officer of Highlands
Insurance Group, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

1.   The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2002
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   August 14, 2002                  /s/ Stephen L. Kibblehouse
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Stephen L. Kibblehouse
                                          Chief Executive Officer
No. 91-6311.

#### Tyler *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 86-279.

#### Basic Inc. et al. *v.*Levinson et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.

The Chief Justice took no part *1084in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Federally Assisted Programs (NUREG/BR-0460)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0460 (PDF - 302.27 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**September 2009 

 Office of Small Business and Civil Rights U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

This brochure explains the requirements of various statutes that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in programs that receive Federal financial assistance, and describes how individuals can file complaints of discrimination when they believe their rights under these laws have been violated. In particular, this brochure answers the following questions:
        - What are the civil rights statutes that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in federally assisted programs?
        - What do the terms "Federal financial assistance" and "federally assisted education programs" mean?
        - Because Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex only in federally assisted education programs, does Title IX apply only to educational institutions?
        - What kinds of sex discrimination does Title IX prohibit?
        - Is employment discrimination on the basis of sex also prohibited in federally assisted programs?
        - How can I file a complaint of discrimination on the basis of sex?
        - What will the Federal agency do with my complaint?
        - What if someone retaliates against me for filing a complaint?

For related information, see Civil Rights and Outreach Coordination and Compliance Program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1850 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 1850 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DONNA SAUERS BESKO POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake 

4 Odessa, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS REO, LLC** 

**v.**

**MARIANNE MEHALSHICK AND**

**MICHAEL MEHALSHICK**

**PETITION OF: MARIANNE MEHALSHICK :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 465 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS REO, LLC** 

**v.**

**MARIANNE MEHALSHICK AND**

**MICHAEL MEHALSHICK**

**PETITION OF: MARIANNE**

**MEHALSHICK :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 466 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015028EN.01004802.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 28/48 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1287/2014 of 28 November 2014 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 348 of 4 December 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_348_R_TOC)
)

On page 15, Annex II, point (8), in the table in point 3:

for:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘China | CN-BO-154 | x | X | x | x | x | x’ |

read:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘China | CN-BIO-154 | x | x | x | x | x | x’ |

On page 21, Annex II, point (14)(a), in the table in point 3:

for:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘Argentina | AR-BIO-135 | — | — | x | — | — | —’ |

read:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘Argentina | AR-BIO-135 | — | — | x | x | — | —’ |

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134467 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134467 COA: 277850 Missaukee CC: 05-002022-FC DAVID WILLIAM EDMUNDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk