alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1665 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1665

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ensure that Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
    considers severe local impact in making a recommendation to the 
              President for a major disaster declaration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster Declaration Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LOCAL IMPACT.

    In making recommendations to the President regarding a major 
disaster declaration, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall give greater weight and consideration to severe 
local impact or recent multiple disasters. Further, the Administrator 
shall make corresponding adjustments to the Agency's policies and 
regulations regarding such consideration. Not later than 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall report 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs of the Senate on the changes made to regulations and policies 
and the number of declarations that have been declared based on the new 
criteria.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1665

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To ensure that Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
    considers severe local impact in making a recommendation to the 
              President for a major disaster declaration.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                    |  |                                 |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                    |  | PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                    |  |                                 |  |                                        
|Date:  May 11, 2006 |  | By:                             |  | /s/ Harmel S. Rayat                    
|                    |  |                                 |  | Harmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
VERNON LAUGHTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5723

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

Vernon Laughter, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

 WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE JASSO ACOSTA

,

Petitioner,

v.

M ERRICK B. G ARLAND

, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 21

- 533

Agency No. A077

- 971

- 888

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2023 ** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, FORREST, and H.A. THOMAS , Circuit Judges

.

Jose Guadalupe Jasso Acosta petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from the denial by an

immigration judge (IJ) of his applications for withholding of removal and relief

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 8 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. CO URT OF APPEALS2 21

- 533

1. The IJ and BIA relied on the appropriate fact or s and proper

evidence in determining that Jasso is ineligible for withholding of removal

because he was convicted of a parti cularly serious crime. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii); Bare v. Barr , 975 F.3d 952, 961 (9th Cir. 2020). Jasso

argues that the agency erred in failing to consider his mental condition at the

time of the crime. See Gomez

- Sanchez v. Sessions , 892 F.3d 985, 99 6 (9th Cir.

2018)

. But Jasso did not provide the IJ with any evidence about his mental state

or health, and

, b ecause Jasso was represented by counsel , the IJ had no

independent duty to develop the record. See Zamorano v. Garland , 2 F.4th

1213, 1226 (9th Cir. 2021) ; see also Benedicto v. Garland , 12 F.4th 1049, 1062

(9th Cir. 2021) (“ Gomez

- Sanchez did not impose a new standard that the IJ must

always reference a petitioner’s mental health in a ‘particularly serious crime’

determination.”). The BIA thus did not abuse its discretion in adopting the IJ’s

analysis. See Bare , 975 F.3d at 961; see generally Matter of Burbano , 20 I

. &

N

. Dec. 872, 874 ( BIA 1994 ) (articulating standard of review)

.

2. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Jasso’s CAT

cla im. As Jasso concedes, there is no evidence of past torture in the record. Nor

did Jasso’s testimony about two encounters with cartel members establish a

likelihood of future torture with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.

See Mairena v. Barr , 9 17 F.3d 11 19 , 11 26 (9th Cir. 20 19 ). As to the articles

Jasso provided , e vidence of generalized violence and crime that is not particular

to the petitioner is insufficient to establish eligibility for CAT relief. See, e.g.

,3 21

- 533

Delgado

- Ortiz v. Holder , 600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION DENIED. 1

1 Accordingly, we also deny the motion to stay removal (Dkt. No. 8) as moot

.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Spatial Effects and Uncertainty Analysis for Rod Ejection Accidents in a PWR (NUREG/IA-0215)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0215 (PDF - 463.98 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 2007

**Prepared by:** A. Avvakumov, V. Malofeev, V. Sidorov

Nuclear Safety Institute Russian Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute" 1, Kurchatov Sq., Moscow 123182 Russia

H. H. Scott, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety (France), and Ministry of Science and Technologies of the Russian Federation

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A rod ejection accident is a design-basis event for a pressurized water reactor. It is well known that spatial effects play a very important role in this accident. In this study four cases using a model of Three Mile Island Unit 1 are considered: ejection of the central or peripheral control rod at the end of cycle or the beginning of cycle. Calculations were carried out using the BARS neutronic code coupled with the RELAP5/MOD3.2 thermal hydraulic code. This coupled code allows three-dimensional pin-by-pin neutronics and assembly-by-assembly thermal-hydraulics simulation of a transient. The results showed that the major parameters of the accident (the peak power and core energy deposition) were a function of spatial effects. Analysis of the dependence of the peak local fuel enthalpy on spatial effects was performed. Uncertainty analysis was carried out for the central control rod ejection accident at hot zero power conditions. The analysis of uncertainties was performed for the following parameters: local fuel enthalpy, maximum core power, and power pulse width. Calculated results showed that the uncertainty in key safety parameters would be determined to a great extent by the uncertainty in the control rod worth. The effect of initial core power on the above parameters was analyzed using a rod ejection accident starting from 33% of rated power.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the
Company) dated March 14, 2003 containing the
audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Martin P. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted, certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | By: /s/ MARTIN P. HUGHES
| |                         
| | Martin P. Hughes        
| | Chief Executive Officer 

March 14, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark B. Hoffman, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Commerce One,Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

Date: March 19, 2004

/s/ Mark B.Hoffman
MEMORANDUM

To: Margaret Sheppard, U.S. EPA

CC: Bella Maranion, Monica Shimamura, and Melissa Fifer, U.S. EPA

From: Jenny Tanphanich, Kara Altshuler, and Mark Wagner, ICF International 

Date: March 8, 2010

Re: Evaluation of Lithium Bromide Toxicity

(EPA Contract Number EP-W-06-008 Task Order 038, Task 06)

This memorandum presents ICF’s evaluation, from a toxicological and exposure 

standpoint, of the following statement for use in the development of an exposure limit for 

the Significant New Alternatives Program.

"Water/lithium bromide absorption exhibits low toxicity. Lithium bromide has a 

24-hour CEGL [Continuous Exposure Guidance Level] value of 1 mg/m3."

Please contact Mark Wagner at 202-862-1155 with any questions or comments.

ICF has conducted a brief review of recent lithium bromide (LiBr) production and use 

data, as well as information regarding toxicity of lithium containing compounds and 

potential exposure data for LiBr in its potential use in absorption-style chillers. Based on 

this review, we believe the following statement is valid: “Water/lithium bromide 

absorption exhibits low toxicity. Lithium bromide has a 24-hour CEGL [Continuous 

Exposure Guidance Level] value of 1 mg/m3.” The CEGL is appropriate as a foundation 

for development of an exposure limit for SNAP use. It is based on an estimated 

concentration of LiBr that would be necessary to achieve a therapeutic dose of lithium in 

the bloodstream (using a known therapeutic dose of lithium carbonate), with appropriate 

conversions to account for inhalation exposure and clear and appropriate application of 

uncertainty factors. The CEGL value is based on a 24-hour, 90-day exposure duration. 

When used for occupational workers, it could be adjusted to reflect an 8-hour exposure, 

which would give an exposure limit of 3 mg/m3for 90 days.

Dermal uptake of water/lithium bromide slurry (the expected form of LiBr formulations 

used as a secondary refrigerant) is expected to be minimal. A default dermal 

permeability factor (Kp) of 1E-03 is assumed based on EPA’s RAGS, Part E and Dermal 

Exposure Assessment guidance documents. Oral uptake of LiBr powder or LiBr/water 

slurry is also expected to be insignificant in an occupational environment. The 3 mg/m3

exposure limit can be used to control potential inhalation exposures. Appropriate 

personal protective equipment (e.g. masks, etc.) should be used by any occupational 

worker responsible for handling LiBr powder.

1

 

1

See 

http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owastand.display_standard_group?p_toc_level=1&p_part_number=1910

#1910_Subpart_I for full list of OSHA personal protective equipment standards.
Written Description of the employment arrangement with Russell Hall



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Description of Employment Arrangement with Russell Hall 
 The following is
a description of the material terms of the employment arrangement with Russell Hall. Mr. Hall served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Phoenix Footwear Group, Inc., (the “Company”) from February 12, 2009 until his
resignation on September 20, 2010. Mr. Hall was an “at will” employee. His employment arrangement was not contained in any formal document. Mr. Hall’s employment with the Company provided for standard employee benefits
and an annual base salary of $340,000 and a performance-based bonus as prescribed by the Compensation Committee—under the Company’s 2010 Cash Bonus Plan. 
 In March 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a “change in control” benefit for Mr. Hall which provided that if the Company terminated
Mr. Hall’s employment other than for cause in connection with a “change of control,” the Company would be obligated to pay him 18 months of salary continuation and benefits.
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of International Travel CD's Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald T. Harrington, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

A.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

B.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:     November  14,  2002     By:   /s/ Gerald  T.  Harrington
                                        ------------------------------
                                            Gerald  T.  Harrington.,
                                            Chief  Executive  Officer and
                                            Chief  Financial  Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Connor, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 402]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered February 16, 1993, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the "abduct[ion]” element of kidnapping in the second degree which requires proof of restraint by either secreting or holding the victim in a place where he or she is not likely to be found (Penal Law § 135.00 [2] [a]) or by using or threatening to use deadly physical force (Penal Law § 135.00 [2] [b]). The People concede on appeal that there was no evidence of deadly physical force, therefore the element of abduction as defined in Penal Law § 135.00 (2) (b) was not established. The defendant’s contention that the evidence was also legally insufficient to establish the element of abduction as defined by Penal Law § 135.00 (2) (a) is unpreserved for appellate review as this argument was not raised in the trial court *(see, People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In his motion to dismiss at the end of the People’s case, the defendant argued only that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the abduction was accomplished by the use or threatened use of deadly physical force. In any event, we find that there was legally sufficient evidence to establish that the victim was secreted or held in a place where she was not likely *665to be found *(see, e.g., People v Salimi,*159 AD2d 658; *People v Valero,*134 AD2d 635).

The defendant further contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence because, *inter alia,*the eyewitness’ testimony, including her identification of him, was incredible. Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of A M Marketing,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: March 27, 2006                                  Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant S.
Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:    May 14, 2004

By:      /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
         ----------------------
Name:    Shant S. Hovnanian
Title:   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       19