alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: 19-005 January 24, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC To Issue Final Rule for Mitigating Severe Events at U.S. Reactors

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed agency staff to publish a rule based on 

lessons learned from the March 2011 accident at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi plant. The rule builds on 

Orders the NRC issued in March 2012.

The Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events rule, which will be published in the Federal 

Register in spring 2019, applies to operating commercial nuclear power plants and power reactor 

license applicants. The rule’s primary impact lies in requiring U.S. commercial reactors to:

• Maintain resources and procedures to cool a reactor’s core and spent fuel pool, as well as 

preserve the reactor’s containment, following an event that disables all of a site’s normal 

and emergency a/c electrical power sources, as well as the site’s ability to safely transfer 

heat to the environment;

• Maintain equipment that can reliably measure spent fuel pool water levels following a 

severe event; 

• Preserve the resources needed to protect the core, containment and spent fuel pool from 

external hazards.

Most U.S. nuclear power plants must comply with the rule’s requirements within two years and 

30 days of the rule’s publication in the Federal Register. Those plants subject to the NRC’s 

Containment Venting Order of March 2013 must comply with the rule within three years and 30 days 

of the rule’s publication.

The rule applies more broadly than either the venting or Mitigation Strategies Order (issued in 

2012) or conditions included in new reactor licenses issued since 2012. The rule therefore includes 

language that ends the Orders and license conditions once the rule’s requirements are in place. The rule 

also lays out the process for ending the requirements for a plant that has permanently shut down.

The NRC staff responded to public comments on the draft rule by removing, reorganizing, 

clarifying and enhancing several sections. The rule also resolves five petitions for rulemaking 

submitted in July 2011, and the rule partially resolves a sixth petition submitted in May 2011.

The NRC and its nuclear power plant licensees will continue post-Fukushima efforts outside of 

the rulemaking context, including analyses of whether additional safety improvements are necessary in 

response to updated site-specific seismic and flooding risk assessments.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Connie S. Farris, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of
Conrex International Financial, Inc. d/b/a Global Express Capital Mortgage, the
manager of Global Express Capital Real Estate Investment Fund I, LLC (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, (the "Report") which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 8, 2003                /s/ Connie S. Farris
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Connie S. Farris
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    President and Secretary

<PAGE>

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Lou Ann Kicker, Chief Financial Officer of Conrex International
Financial, Inc. d/b/a Global Express Capital Mortgage, the manager of Global
Express Capital Real Estate Investment Fund I, LLC (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, 2002 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 8, 2003                          /s/ Lou Ann Kicker
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Lou Ann Kicker,
                                          Chief Financial Officer


                                       2
<PAGE>
 
EXTENDED STAY AMERICA INC.

EXHIBIT 11 --  Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED        NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
                                          ----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                          SEPTEMBER 30,  SEPTEMBER 30,   SEPTEMBER 30,  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                              1996            1995           1996            1995
                                          -------------  -------------   -------------  -------------
<S>                                       <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
                                                     (In thousands, except per share data)
PRIMARY:
     Average shares outstanding                  67,571         21,712          54,655         21,712
     Net effect of dilutive stock
      options - based on the
      treasury stock method using the
      average market price................        1,494          1,266           1,253          1,265
                                                -------        -------         -------        -------
        TOTAL.............................       69,065         22,978          55,908         22,978
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======

     Net income (loss)....................      $ 2,293        $  (491)        $ 2,279        $(1,253)
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======

     Net income (loss) per share..........      $  0.03        $ (0.02)        $  0.04        $ (0.05)
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======

FULLY DILUTED
     Average shares outstanding...........       67,571         21,712          54,655         21,712
     Net effect of dilutive stock
      options -- based on the
      treasury stock method using the
      greater of ending
      or average market price.............        1,897          1,266           1,736          1,266
                                                -------        -------         -------        -------
        TOTAL.............................       69,468         22,978          56,391         22,978
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======

Net income (loss).........................      $ 2,293        $  (491)        $ 2,279        $(1,253)
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======

Net income (loss) per share...............      $  0.03        $ (0.02)        $  0.04        $ (0.05)
                                                =======        =======         =======        =======
</TABLE>
Motion granted; Order filed November 29, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00429-CR

____________

CRISTIAN YOSELI MARQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1433052

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court her desire 

to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant’s motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 174th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that 

the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before December 14, 2016; that 
2

the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 

appellant is made; and that appellant file her pro se brief with this court within thirty days 

of that date.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 18, 2016

a1115 

# Order

Clerk November 18, 2016

152802 & (18) (22)(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152802

COA: 328557

Genesee CC: 11

- 028915

- FC

GARY DUANE FRISBY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of Court, the motion by defendant

- appellant to dismiss his application

for leave to appeal and the prosecutor’s acquiescenc e in the motion are considered. The

motion to dismiss is granted, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BERTHEL FISHER & COMPANY LEASING, INC. AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         318,703
<SECURITIES>                                 1,481,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,732,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (406,990)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         310,410
<DEPRECIATION>                               (179,489)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,343,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,816
<BONDS>                                      5,392,422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,621,422
<COMMON>                                       884,705
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,866,623)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,343,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,200,082
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               854,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                46,598
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             383,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (84,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   228,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (313,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (313,013)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.92)


</TABLE>
No. 90-5731.

#### Chase *v.*Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
# UNITED TACONITE FLOW SHEET No. 2: REV 1 (EXTERNAL) MINE

### CO~RSE ORE 

## FINES CRUSHER 5000T SURGE 

# f 600,000T SURGE UNLOADING 

### 1

- - ---j·r=C=O=A-R_S_E _O_R_E_S_U_R G-E--,1 POCrET :

## ~ I #1 CONV. #2 CONV. ,-- #3 lOOOT SURGE 

# f <AL TERNA TD 

# t : '-------__j 

### I 3rd STAGE SURGE 

### J
___ 

# j CONV.
#7 CONV.**I,--~** #8 CONV. 2700T SURGE
STAGE CRUSHING 

## I**.----~** #6 CONV. 

## I 4th STAGE SURGE 

## I

14th STAGE CRUSHING 

## I 2 DECK D'SIZE SCREENS

### r---~#Sc CONV U'SIZE 

# f #Sf**CONV~_D_'S_IZ_E-----1** 2 DECK SCREENS #9c CONV U'SIZE
#9ct**CONVr-------11~•#9f** CONV**r-----------~#** 10 CONV,

SEE FLO'v/ SHEETS 3 

## & 4 lBO,OOOT SURGE ,------L----, FINE ORE SURGE
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Residual Radioactive Contamination From Decommissioning:User's Manual DandD Version 2.1 (NUREG/CR-5512, Volume 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5512, Volume 2 (PDF 7.89 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2001**Date Published:** April 2001

**Prepared by:** K. McFadden, Sigma Software LLC D.A. Brosseau, W.E. Beyeler, Sandia National Laboratories C.D. Updegraff, Gram, Inc.

Under Contract to Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185

R- Cady, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6804

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Decommissioning and Decontamination (DandD) software package developed by Sandia National Laboratories for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) provides a user-friendly analytical tool to address the technical dose criteria contained in NRC's Radiological Criteria for License Termination rule (10 CFR Part 20 Subpart E). Specifically, DandD embodies the NRC's screening methodology to allow licensees to convert residual radioactivity contamination levels at their site to annual dose, in a way consistent with both 10 CFR Part 20 and the corresponding implementation guidance currently under development by NRC. The screening methodology and DandD are part of a larger decision framework that allows and encourages licensees to optimize decisions regarding alternative actions at their site, including the collection of additional data and information. The screening methodology employs reasonably conservative scenarios, fate and transport models, and default parameter values and parameter distributions to allow the NRC to quantitatively estimate the risk of terminating a license given only information about the level of contamination. A licensee has the option of specifying only the level of contamination and running the code with the default parameters or, if site-specific information is available, modifying scenario pathways or providing site-specific parameter distributions and then calculating dose. The original draft of Volume 2 of the NUREG/CR-5512 series documented a User's Manual for the deterministic Version 1.0 of the DandD software. This final version of Volume 2 provides an entirely new User's Manual for the Version 2.1 release of DandD, thus superceding and replacing DandD Version 1.0 and its draft User's Manual. The latest version of the software allows probabilistic (Monte Carlo) dose assessments and incorporates a new and improved Microsoft® Windows® standard user interface.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
---

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the
Agreement) made as of the 1st day of October, 2006.

|BETWEEN:                               
|---------------------------------------
|Albert Friesen,                        
|(hereinafter called the Consultant), 
|OF THE FIRST PART,                     
|                                       
|A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.,         
|(hereinafter called Enterprises),    
|OF THE SECOND PART.                    
|                                       
|- and -                                
|                                       
|Medicure Inc.,                         
|(hereinafter called the Corporation),
|OF THE THIRD PART.                     

WHEREAS the Consultant,
Enterprises and the Corporation have entered into a Consulting Services
Agreement (the Consulting Agreement) made as of the 1st day of
October, 2001 and subsequently amended on the 1st day of October,
2003 and 1st day of October, 2005;

NOW THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE
WITNESSETH that for the sum of $1.00 and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by
the parties hereto, the Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation covenant and
agree with each other as follows:

1. All parties to the Consulting Agreement namely the
Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation agree to amend section 4 of the
Consulting Agreement such that, effective October 1, 2006, the Corporation shall
pay to Enterprises a fee of $20,833.33 per month plus applicable goods and
services tax for services provided by the Consultant. The Consultant shall also
be eligible to receive a

---

performance bonus of up to 30 percent of his annual salary.
This agreement is subject to a two-year term ending on September 30, 2008.

2. Other than as amended herein all other terms and conditions
of the Consulting Agreement continue in full force and effect.

3. This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be
binding on the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

4. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of Manitoba.

5. The preamble hereto forms an integral part of this
Agreement.

6. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, and all such counterparts shall for all purposes constitute one
instrument binding on the parties hereto even though all the parties are not
signatories to the same counterpart.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this
Agreement has been executed by the Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation
as of the day and the year first above written.

| | Albert Friesen               
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | Per:                         
| |                              
| | A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.
| |                              
| | Per:                         
| |                              
| | Medicure Inc.                
| |                              
| | Per:                         

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Acquisition University Board of Visitors; Notice of 
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition University, DoD.

ACTION: Meeting notice; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 (80 FR 1627-1628), the Department 
of Defense published a notice announcing a meeting of the Defense 
Acquisition University Board of Visitors. The Department of Defense is 
publishing this notice to announce the cancellation of this meeting, 
which was scheduled for Wednesday, January 28, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 
12:00 p.m.

DATES: The meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 28, 2015, from 9:00 
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. has been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caren Hergenroeder, Protocol Director, 
DAU. Phone: 703-805-5134. Fax: 703-805-5940. Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0e0c1f08034305081f0a08031f020809081f2d090c1843000401"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="761517041318581e130411131804191312130436121703581b1f1a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to difficulties beyond the control of 
the Department of Defense, the Designated Federal Officer was unable to 
submit the Federal Register notice pertaining to cancelling the Defense 
Acquisition University Board of Visitors' meeting, scheduled for 
January 28, 2015, that ensured compliance with the requirements of 41 
CFR 102-3.150(a). Accordingly, the Advisory Committee Management 
Officer for the Department of Defense, waives the 15-calendar day 
notification requirement pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150(b).

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015-01134 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,338,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,077,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                   151,676
<INVENTORY>                                    962,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,335,341
<PP&E>                                       4,185,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                 871,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,291,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,899,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,485
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,464,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,291,425
<SALES>                                     13,868,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,868,965
<CGS>                                       10,802,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,372,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,540,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,540,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,540,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.51)

        


</TABLE>