alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:31 a.m. on Wednesday, January 21, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Jeremiah O. Norton (Appointive), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Comptroller of the Currency), Director Richard Cordray (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

 Dated: January 21, 2015.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01330 Filed 1-21-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
#### CONSOLIDATED MOTOR INNS, petitioner, v. BVA CREDIT CORPORATION.

No. 81-1988.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 21, 1982.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Former Fifth Circuit.

Denied.

Justice POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and How It Works (NUREG/BR-0256)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0256 (PDF - 733.15 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**August 2000

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001 

## Abstract

This brochure describes the programs used by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to fulfill its primary mission for the regulation of the Nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure the adequate protection of the public's health, safety, and environment. It will briefly provide some historical perspectives and legislative mandates, describe the major NRC programs as well as how the NRC goals are accomplished, and discuss the mechanisms by which NRC oversight is implemented. Finally, it will provide information on NRC's administrative and rulemaking processes as well as dicsuss participation opportunities available to the public that can assist NRC in its regulatory oversight mission. It has been developed for use by members of the public, licensees and certificate holders, and new NRC staff.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly Report of TJT, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terrence J. Sheldon,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. CodeSection 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Terrence J. Sheldon |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Terrence J. Sheldon     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 14, 2003            |

 

1

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  Commission Overview  (NUREG/BR-0099, Revision 14)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - NRC Mission

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0099, Revision 14 (PDF - 2.77 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2016**Date Published:** June 2016

Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## NRC Mission

The NRC licenses and regulates the Nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to protect public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment. Specifically, the NRC regulates commercial nuclear power plants; research, test and training reactors; nuclear fuel cycle facilities; and the use of radioactive materials in medical, academic and industrial settings.

The agency also regulates the transport, storage, and disposal of radioactive materials and waste, and licenses the import and export of radioactive materials. While the NRC only regulates industries within the United States, the agency works with agencies around the world to enhance global nuclear safety and security.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRadioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-2907)

# Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants: Annual Report 2015 (NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 21)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 21 (PDF – 1.96 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2018**Date Published:** April 2019

**Prepared by:** J. Davis

Oak Ridge Associated Universities 1299 Bethel Valley Road, SC-200, MS-21 Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Steven Garry, NRC Project Manager

Micheal Smith, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In 2015, there were 99 commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) licensed to operate on 61 sites in the United States (U.S.) regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each year, each power reactor sends a report to the NRC that identifies the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents discharged from the facility. In 2015, these effluent reports comprised about 10,000 pages of information, which described the radioactive materials discharged, as well as the resulting radiation doses to the general public. This report summarizes that information and presents the information in a format intended for both nuclear professionals and the general public.

The reader can use this report to quickly characterize the radioactive discharges from any U.S. NPP in 2015. The radioactive effluents from one reactor can be compared with other reactors. The results can also be compared with typical (or median) effluents for the industry, including short-term trends and long-term trends. 

Reference information is included so the reader can compare the doses from NPP effluents with the doses that the general public receives from other sources of radiation, such as medical procedures, industrial devices, and natural materials in the environment.

Although all operating NPPs released some radioactive materials in 2015, all effluents discharged were within the NRC's and the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) public dose limits, and NRC's "as low as is reasonably achievable" (ALARA) criteria. Additionally, the doses from radioactive effluents were much less than the doses from other sources of natural radiation that are commonly considered safe. This indicates radioactive effluents from NPPs in 2015 had no significant impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# The IG at the NRC (NUREG/BR-0146, Rev. 3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        -  NUREG/BR-0146, Rev. 3 (PDF - 1.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Office of the Inspector General 2003**

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Foreword

This fourth edition of "The IG at the NRC" is intended to serve as a stand alone reference of the policies, procedures and statutory authority of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Inspector General (OIG). In addition to excerpts from the IG Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App 3, it provides information about the OIG mission and functions and current policy and procedures.

Since my appointment as Inspector General for the NRC in July 1996, I have made education a priority. Maintaining this reference as a current source of information is an important part of this effort, both within the agency and for our other stakeholders. I request that you use this document so as to be better informed about the OIG. I also invite your questions and comments so that we may have a continuing dialogue on ways to combat and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2779

WILLIAM M. COYNE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION; K. C. LEUNG; THOMAS ULRICH; CHARLES ATHAS; THOMAS PARR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-1175-CCB) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William M. Coyne, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Howard Simpson, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order entering summary judgment in this action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coyne v. Computer Sciences Corp. , No. CA-95-1175-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Shih-Jye Cheng, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release Nos. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003), 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and 33-8545 (March
2, 2005)];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2006



/s/    SHIH-JYE
CHENGName: Shih-Jye Cheng Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 128 (Thursday, July 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15646]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 128 / Thursday, July 3, 2014 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 37963]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 429

[Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-NOC-0039]

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee: 
Cancellation of Open Meetings

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces the cancellation of 
open meetings for the Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group of 
the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee 
(ASRAC) scheduled for July 23 through July 25, 2014.

DATES: The open meetings scheduled for July 23, July 24, and July 25, 
2014 are cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Cymbalsky, ASRAC Designated 
Federal Officer, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, 
DC, 20024, (202) 287-1692. Email: asrac@ee.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE published a notice of open meetings for 
the Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group of the ASRAC to be 
held in June and July of 2014 (79 FR 2383, Jan. 14, 2014) and a second 
notice adding an extra day to both series of meetings (79 FR 29692, May 
23, 2014). Since that time, the working group has concluded its 
activities and determined the second series of meetings, scheduled for 
July 23 through July 25, is no longer necessary. Through this notice, 
DOE announces cancellation of those meetings.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 27, 2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2014-15646 Filed 7-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNRC Maps

# NRC Maps of Agreement States

*Some of the links on this page are to non-NRC servers and websites and are provided solely as a reference for the convenience of users. NRC cannot guarantee the authenticity of documents or the validity of information obtained at these non-NRC websites. See our Site Disclaimer for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, September 7, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement States
          - Decommissioning Sites
          - Emergency Preparedness Maps
          - Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)
          - NRC Regions
          - Nuclear Materials Facilities
          - Power Reactors
          - Radioactive Waste Sites
          - Research and Test Reactors
          - Uranium Recovery Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, September 7, 2023
No. 82-5972.

#### Cote *v.*Eagle Stores, Inc., et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




[Letterhead of The St. Joe Company]



January 12, 2011



Fairholme Funds, Inc.


4400 Biscayne Boulevard, 9th Floor


Miami, FL 33137


Attn: Bruce R. Berkowitz, President



Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C.


4400 Biscayne Boulevard, 9th Floor


Miami, FL 33137


Attn: Bruce R. Berkowitz, Managing Member



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to that certain letter agreement (the “Standstill Agreement”) dated as of
April 6, 2009, by and among The St. Joe Company, Fairholme Funds, Inc. and Fairholme Capital
Management, L.L.C. The St. Joe Company, Fairholme Funds, Inc. and Fairholme Capital Management,
L.L.C. hereby agree that the Standstill Agreement is terminated, effective immediately, and shall
have no further force or effect.



Very truly yours,



The St. Joe Company



By:  /s/ Wm. Britton Greene

Name: Wm. Britton Greene

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer





Confirmed and agreed to as of the date first written above:



Fairholme Funds, Inc.



By:  /s/ Bruce Berkowitz

Name: Bruce Berkowitz

Title: President





Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C.



By:  /s/ Bruce Berkowitz

Name: Bruce Berkowitz

Title: Managing Member
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Improvement of RELAP5/MOD3.3 Reflood Model Based on the Assessments against FLECHT-SEASET Tests (NUREG/IA-0251)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0251 (PDF - 4.94 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**February 2011

**Prepared by:** Tong-Soo Choi, Chang-Hwan Ban KEPCO Nuclear Fuel Daejeon, Korea

Dong-Gu Kang, Seung-Hoon Ahn Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety Daejeon, Korea

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Prepared as part of The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP) 

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The reflood model of RELAP5/MOD3.3 was assessed against eight selected FLECHT-SEASET tests. Comparisons of predicted and measured peak cladding temperatures and quench times indicated that the code predicts peak cladding temperatures relatively well. However, rod quenches were predicted to occur too early. To improve the predictability for quench times, we carefully reviewed and modified the wall-to-fluid heat transfer models for the film boiling regime. After the modifications, the same set of eight FLECHT-SEASET tests was simulated again to show that the modifications made in this study improve the code’s predictability not only for quench times but also for peak clad temperatures. The modifications reduced the RMS error in the prediction of peak clad temperatures and quench times from 48.3 to 36.7 K and 85.9 to 32.1 seconds, respectively.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021