alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff to Discuss Inspection Findings November 19 at Palisades Nuclear Power Station

----

----

News Release III-97-98

November 17, 1997

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS INSPECTION FINDINGS NOVEMBER 19 AT PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Wednesday, November 19, with Consumers Energy Company officials to discuss the findings of a recent special inspection at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. The inspection covered an October 17 incident in which the entire reactor control rod drive system was taken out of service for maintenance of one control rod drive while the plant was in operation.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the training building at the Palisades plant. The plant is located on Blue Star Highway south of South Haven, Michigan. The meeting is open to public observation.

In the October 17 incident, maintenance was planned on one of 45 control rod drives. The drives move the control rods in the reactor to increase or decrease the reactor power level. A separate system is used to quickly shut down the reactor by fully inserting all control rods.

In preparation for the maintenance, the plant staff used a procedure that was intended for use while the plant was shut down. This procedure blocked the electric power to all 45 control rod drives.

The correct procedure would have shut off the electric power to only the drive involved in the maintenance.

The control rod drives were disabled for about 3 hours while the maintenance was performed. During that time, the reactor could have been shut down if necessary by inserting all the control rods in an automatic or manual reactor trip. However, the control rods could not have been moved individually to adjust reactor power level.

There was no need to move the control rods while the maintenance was underway. The use of the incorrect procedure was discovered by the utility during a review of the maintenance activity on October 20.

The maintenance procedure was subsequently reviewed by the NRC resident inspectors, and a special NRC inspection was later conducted into the incident. The November 19 meeting will present the results of that special inspection to utility management.

Note: The schedule of NRC meetings open to public observation is available on the NRC's internet web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
No. 85-6350.

#### Podborny *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pau-peris*and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Griffith*v. *Kentucky, ante,*p. 314.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# MELCOR – DAKOTA Coupling for Uncertainty Analyses, in a SNAP Environment/Architecture (NUREG/IA-0532)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0532 (PDF – 20.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2022**Date Published:** April 2023

**Prepared by:**Fulvio Mascari*, Andrea Bersano*, Giuseppe Agnello**, Michela Angelucci***, Jesse Phillips****, David Luxat****

*ENEA, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna, 40129, Italy**University of Palermo, Department of Engineering, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 6, 90128, Palermo, Italy***University of Pisa, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering (DICI), Via Diotisalvi 2, Pisa Italy****Sandia National Laboratories, 1515 Eubank SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87123

H. Hossein, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP)

**Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Uncertainty estimation to assess figure-of-merits characterizing evolution of a severe accident transient is a topic of current investigation in development of best-estimate plus uncertainty methodology. The probabilistic method to propagate input uncertainty is one of the methodologies used to develop Uncertainty Analyses (UAs). Using this methodology, UAs are performed by sampling probability distributions that describe the range of possible values that computer simulation model inputs can have. For each sample (or realization) of a set of uncertain input parameters, a computer simulation is performed. From the range of code simulation results obtained for each input realization, a distribution of code results is obtained. In this process, the distribution of input uncertainties is *propagated* to obtain a distribution of possible code results (i.e., the code output uncertainty). This probabilistic methodology is facilitated using Uncertainty Tools (UTs), which can be coupled with the accident analysis computer code to perform an UA. One of the UTs currently available is DAKOTA, developed by Sandia National Laboratories. DAKOTA is also provided as a SNAP plug-in. SNAP is a graphical user interface designed to support the use of USNRC codes. This report demonstrates the workflow within SNAP to assist other interested analysts with their applications given they are members of the USNRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP). Two sample applications are shown.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 18, 2023
Due to the Christmas holiday t here is no Nebraska Court of Appeals release for the week of December 24 , 201 8

.
Exhibit 10.43


 


TWENTY FIRST AMENDMENT TO


GENERAL CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


(A Fifteenth Amendment does not exist)


 


THIS
AGREEMENT, dated and effective as of November 28, 2007, between SPECTRUM
Commercial Services Company, a Minnesota Corporation, having its mailing
address and principal place of business at Two Appletree Square, Suite 415,
Bloomington, Minnesota 55425 (herein called “Lender” or “SCS”), and Appliance
Recycling Centers of America, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, having the
mailing address and principal place of business at 7400 Excelsior Boulevard,
Minneapolis, MN 55426, (herein called “Borrower”), amends that certain General
Credit and Security Agreement dated August 30, 1996, (“Credit Agreement”)
as amended.  Where the provisions of this
Agreement conflict with the Credit Agreement, the intent of this Agreement
shall control.


 


1.               The definition of “Maximum
Principal Amount” under paragraph 2 of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted
and replaced with the following:


 


Maximum Principal Amount shall mean:


 


As of the date hereof, Sixteen Million and No/100ths Dollars
($16,000,000), less Eighty percent (80%) of the amount of issued but unpaid
financing authorizations issued by Lender in favor of Whirlpool Corporation,
less Fifty percent (50%) of the amount of issued but unpaid financing
authorizations issued by Lender in favor of General Electric Company, GE
Appliances or any other company; and


 


Effective on January 27, 2008, Fourteen Million and No/100ths
Dollars ($14,000,000), less Eighty percent (80%) of the amount of issued but
unpaid financing authorizations issued by Lender in favor of Whirlpool
Corporation, less Fifty percent (50%) of the amount of issued but unpaid
financing authorizations issued by Lender in favor of General Electric Company,
GE Appliances or any other company.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


 


	
  SPECTRUM
  COMMERCIAL SERVICES COMPANY

  	
   

  	
  APPLIANCE
  RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  
	
  Steven
  I. Lowenthal, Co-CEO

  	
   

  	
  Edward
  R. Cameron, CEO

  
					



 


REAFFIRMATION


Of Edward R. Cameron


 


The
undersigned, Edward R. “Jack” Cameron, hereby reaffirms all of the terms of the
Support Agreement issued by him in favor of SPECTRUM Commercial Services
Company (including its participants and assigns) and dated as of December 29,
2004, and acknowledges that such agreement is in full force and effect
according to its terms.  The undersigned
understands and acknowledges that this Reaffirmation is required by SPECTRUM
Commercial Services Company as a condition to the execution of the Twentieth
Amendment to the General Credit and Security Agreement between Appliance
Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and SPECTRUM Commercial Services
Company.


 


 


	
  Dated
  as of:
                                   
  , 2007

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Edward
  R. Cameron

  



 


1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001002813
 
<NAME>                        Point West Capital Corporation
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         18,247,437
<SECURITIES>                                    5,750,508 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     146,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                              
<INVENTORY>                                    37,586,356 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  724,854
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 62,455,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,426,647
<BONDS>                                        38,804,107 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           42,918
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,181,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   62,455,155
<SALES>                                           377,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,489,545
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,386,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,721,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,617,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,617,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 2,827,594
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,209,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.33  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0

<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND PURCHASED LIFE INSURANCE POLICY.
<F2>REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY. 

</FN>
 
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2017

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3983-3984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Ampac Fine 
Chemicals, LLC

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: AMPAC Fine Chemicals, LLC applied to be registered as a 
manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA 
grants AMPAC Fine Chemicals, LLC registration as a manufacturer of the 
controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated June 10, 2014, and published 
in the Federal Register on June 17, 2014, 79 FR 34553, AMPAC Fine 
Chemicals LLC, Highway 50 and Hazel Avenue, Building 05001, Rancho 
Cordova, California 95670, applied to be registered as a manufacturer 
of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or 
objections were submitted to this notice.
    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
AMPAC Fine Chemicals, LLC to manufacture the basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with

[[Page 3984]]

the public interest and with United States obligations under 
international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 
1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective 
controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's 
physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with 
state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and 
history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methylphenidate (1724).......................................         II
Thebaine (9333)..............................................         II
Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670)...............................         II
Tapentadol (9780)............................................         II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company is a contract manufacturer. In reference to poppy straw 
concentrate the company will manufacture thebaine intermediates for 
sale to its customers for further manufacture. No other activity for 
this drug code is authorized for this registration.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01296 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
No. 90-6258.

#### Pierre *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 90-6159.

#### Martin et al. *v.*Marriner et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 93
 EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 93
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 44 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 45 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 46 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 47 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 48 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 49 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 50 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 51 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 52 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 53 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 54 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 55 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 56 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 57 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 58 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 59 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 60 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 61 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 62 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 63 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 64 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 65 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 66 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 67 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 68 of 93
EPA SANITIZED 

Page 69 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 70 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 71 of 93
 EPA SANITIZED Page 72 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 73 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 74 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 75 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 76 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 77 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 78 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 79 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 80 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 81 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 82 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 83 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 84 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 85 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 86 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 87 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 88 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 89 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 90 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 91 of 93
EPA SANITIZED Page 92 of 93
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 93 of 93
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff Withdraws Proposed Civil Penalty Against TVA at Sequoyah Nuclear Power  Plant

----

----

No: II-98-07

February 10, 1998

**NRC STAFF WITHDRAWS PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST TVA AT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has notified the Tennessee Valley Authority that a $55,000 civil penalty, proposed by the NRC last December 8 for violations at the Sequoyah nuclear power plant near Chattanooga, is being withdrawn.

In a February 5 letter to TVA, James Lieberman, director of the NRC's Office of Enforcement, said the agency had reconsidered the proposed enforcement action at TVA's request and concluded that no civil penalty was appropriate in this case.

In July of last year, a senior reactor operator at Sequoyah failed to properly align a spare vital direct current battery to its board, resulting in its being inoperable for about 30 hours. Direct current batteries provide backup power to some safety equipment when the plant loses both offsite and emergency diesel power.

TVA agreed that the cited violations occurred but asked that the NRC reconsider imposition of the fine because TVA personnel eventually identified and corrected the problem.

Lieberman's letter said that, although TVA missed previous opportunities to identify and correct the violations, the NRC felt that it was appropriate in this case to credit TVA for the factor of identification to "recognize the diligence of the TVA training instructor whodiscovered the vital battery problem and took prompt action to ensure system operability."

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED F. M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D. , CHILDREN , Appel lant ,
v. Case No. 5D22

- 2308 LT C ase No. 2020

- DP

- 000137
DEPARTMENT O F CHI LDREN AND FAMILIES ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed January 12, 2023 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Citrus County , Daniel B. Merritt, Sr. , Ju dge. Joseph Anthony M anzo , Lar go , for Appellant

. Andrew Allen Feigenbaum, of Children's Legal Services, W est Palm B each, an d Rachel B atten, of Children’s Legal S ervices , Brooksville , f or Appell ee

. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, S tatewide Director of

A ppeas and Ama nda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of S tatewide Guardian ad Litem Office, T allahassee, and Ryan C. T yler and Brooke M. Mesner, of2

D efending Best I nteres ts Project, R atzan, W eissman & B oldt, B oca Raton, for Statewide Guardian ad Litem

. P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

EV A NDE R , E DWARDS and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6484
SELVYN TILLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES OWENS, Correctional Officer; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; EUGENE NUTH, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-2784-DKC) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Selvyn Tillett, Appellant Pro Se. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tillett v. Owens , No. CA-96-2784-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED