alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### To: TerryLogee, USDOE

From: Jim McMahon,Jiang Lin, Barbara Atkinson, Isaac Turiel, LBNL Date: August 7, 1996 Re: EUIs in Table 5.6 of 1996 Draft Report on Ballasts In a May 17th telephone communication with Isaac Turiel of LBNL, Bob Wisbey of NEMA questioned the reported trend in commercial sector EUIs, specifically, the upturn at the end of the forecast period. (This issue was referred to as Question 7 in LBNL's May 20th letter to NEMA.) This memo presents a replacement table and an explanation. In the attached table, Energy Intensity (EI) replaces Energy Utilization Index (EUI) in Table 5.6 in the February 1996 Draft Report. Both EUI and El were calculated in the COMMEND 4.0 model, but EUI was reported. As defined in COMMEND Detailed Lighting Module, EUI reflects only changes in equipment efficacy over time. El is a more complete measure of kilowatt-hours per square foot per year, since El includes changes in efficacy as well as in annual lighting hours and in footcandle levels. El in year y = EUI in year y

* (Annual operating hours in year y / Annual operating hours in base year) * (Footcandles in year y / Footcandles in base year) In the old table, EUI increased slightly in later years of the forecast because of the change in the share of total lumens contributed by fluorescent lighting. The lumens are used as weights to calculate the overall average efficacy (which is reflected in the EUI) each year. Over time, T8 and T12/ES lamps replace T12 lamps in existing buildings, decreasing lumens per fixture (and footcandle levels as lumens per square foot). As a result of two factors, 1) lower lumens from fluorescent lighting (in contrast to constant lumens assumed from non-fluorescent lighting), and 2) decreased share of fluorescent lighting in new compared to existing buildings, fluorescent lighting delivers a smaller share of all lighting over time. As efficacy of fluorescent lighting increases, EUI decreases. But then decreasingsharesof fluorescent lighting (as a share of total lumens) cause EUI to increase slightly after 2010. The new table (attached) presents Energy Intensity (EI), which includes the changes in efficacy, in footcandle levels, and in annual lighting hours. As described above, efficacy increases over of forecast period, footcandles decrease, and annual lighting hours also decrease slightly (as consumer behavior responds to projected increased electricity prices). El consistently shows a decline in kilowatt-hours per square foot per year.

### Interior Lighting Energy Intensity kWh/sq. ft/year

1992 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 

### Commercial Sector Basecase 3.61 3.24 2.87 2.76 2.67 2.61 2.55 2.50 2.45 Level 1 2.86 2.70 2.61 2.55 2.49 2.45 2.41 Level 2 2.86 2.67 2.57 2.51 2.46 2.42 2.38 Level 3 2.85 2.66 2.55 2.50 2.45 2.41 2.37 Level 4 2.85 2.66 2.55 2.49 2.44 2.40 2.36



### Industrial Sector Basecase 3.80 3.61 3.34 3.19 3.13 3.09 3.06 3.03 3.01 Level 1 3.33 3.14 3.06 3.03 3.00 2.98 2.97 Level 2 3.31 3.07 2.93 2.92 2.91 2.90 2.89 Level 3 3.30 3.05 2.91 2.89 2.88 2.88 2.87 Level 4 3.30 3.05 2.91 2.89 2.88 2.88 2.87
#### CATALYTIC, INC., Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner.

No. 82-7357

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 15, 1984.

John Richard Carrigan, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner, cross-respondent.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner.

*541ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, JOHNSON and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States dated April 30, 1984, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2164, 80 L.Ed.2d 548, vacating the judgment of this Court, 714 F.2d 158, and remanding this case, we REMAND the case to the National Labor Relations Board for further consideration in light of *Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc.,*268 NLRB No. 173 (Feb. 22, 1984).
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Balaton Power Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 25, 2010                                                                            
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|/s/ Michael RosaMichael Rosa, President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Date: June 25, 2010                                                                            
|                                                                                               
|/s/ Paul E. PrestonPaul E. Preston, Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)     
|
|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 469 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-444, K2025-441.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27900 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of CCFL Model of RELAP5/MOD3 Against Simple Vertical Tubes and Rod Bundle Tests (NUREG/IA-0100)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0100 (PDF 3.43 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** June 1993

**Prepared by:** S. Cho, N. Arne, Korea Electric Power Corporation, Research Center B. D. Chung, H. J. Kim, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety

Korea Electric Power Corporation, Research Center 117–15 Yongjeon–Dong Dong–Gu Taejon, Korea

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety P. O. Box 16 Daeduk–Danji Taejon, Korea, 305–353

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The CCFL model used in RELAP5/MOD3 version 5m5 has been assessed against simple vertical tubes and rod bundle tests performed at a facility of Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute.

The effect of changes in tube diameter and nodalization of tube section were investigated. The roles of interfacial drags on the flooding characteristics are discussed. Differences between the calculation and the experiment are also discussed.

A comparison between model assessment results and the test data showed that the calculated value lay well on the experimental flooding curve specified by user, but the pressure jump before onset of flooding was not calculated.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff GPU Nuclear To Discuss Apparent Violations At TMI

----

----

I-97-90

July 22, 1997

**NRC STAFF, GPU NUCLEAR TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT TMI**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of GPU Nuclear Corporation on Friday, July 25, to discuss two apparent violations of agency requirements at GPU's Three Mile Island nuclear plant, in Middletown, Pa. The predecisional enforcement conference, which is open to the public for observation, will be held at 10 a.m. in the NRC's Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa.

Identified during the March 5 full participation emergency exercise at the plant, the apparent violations are: a failure to recognize a general emergency and a failure to assess the need for protective action beyond the 10-mile emergency planning zone.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2

to the

WALGREEN CO. PROFIT-SHARING RESTORATION PLAN




I.


Effective for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2011, the following Section 4.7 shall be
added after Section 4.6 (Effect of Payment):



4.7 Frozen Plan. No contributions to the Secular Trust shall be permitted under the Plan for Plan
Years beginning on and after January 1, 2011. Participants who have a phantom account under the
Secular Trust prior to such date, however, may continue to maintain such account.”
```

EXHIBIT 99.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Howard Cooper,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Teton Petroleum  Company (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
     31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 10, 2003

                                          /s/ Howard Cooper
                                          -----------------
                                          Name: Howard Cooper
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
```
No: III-19-001 January 8, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Resident Inspector at Fermi Nuclear Power Station

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Thomas Taylor as 

the new resident inspector at the Fermi nuclear power plant. The single-unit plant 

is located in Newport, Mich., 25 miles northeast of Toledo, Ohio.

Taylor joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in Region III in 2007. He has 

served as a resident inspector at the Palisades and D.C. Cook nuclear power 

plants. Before joining the NRC, he enlisted in the U.S. Navy and received a 

bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the U.S. Naval Academy. He then served on 

the USS Kentucky as a nuclear submarine officer. He also earned a master’s of 

engineering management degree from Old Dominion University.

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations. Taylor joins NRC senior resident inspector Tom Briley 

at the Fermi facility. They will serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting 

inspections and monitoring significant work projects.

The NRC resident inspectors can be reached at (630) 829-9595.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of The KingThomason Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, T.E. King III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
 April 16, 2008





/s/ Thomas E. King
III


T.E. King III


Chief Executive Officer








The above certification is furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit
      21.1





Subsidiaries
      of Viper Networks, Inc.


a
      Nevada
      corporation


as
      of
      December 31, 2005











The
      following subsidiaries are wholly owned by the Company:





Viper
      Networks, Inc., a California corporation





Coliance
      Communications, Inc., a California corporation





Mid-Atlantic
      International, Inc., a Michigan corporation





Viper
      International, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation (formerly Adoria
      Communications, LLC)








The
      Company’s ownership of Nextphase Wireless, Inc. (formerly NextPhase
      Technologies, Inc.) was 1,898,733 shares of Common Stock or approximately 8.5%
      of the shares reported by Nextphase Wireless as issued and outstanding on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005.
#### Drachenberg, Respondent, vs. Hustisford State Bank and another, Appellants.

*February 8*

March *6, 1928.*

Companion case to *Bischoff v. Hustisford, State Bank, ante,*p. 312.

Appeals from an order of the circuit court for Dodge county: C. M. Davison, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed upon both appeals.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Skinner & Thauer*of Watertown and *Clark & Lueck*of Beaver Dam, and for the respondent on that of *Hoyt, Bender, McIntyre & Hoyt,*attorneys, and *Werner J. Trimborn,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

Rosenberry, J.

This is a companion case to *Bischoff v. Hustisford State Bank,*decided herewith *{ante,*p. 312, 218 N. W. 353). The mandate in this case will be the same as in that case for the reasons there stated.

*By the Court.*— Upon the appeal of the defendants that part of the order appealed from is reversed. Upon plaintiff’s appeal the order sustaining the demurrer to the complaint is reversed. The cause is remitted with directions to overrule the demurrer and for the disposition of the case by the trial court as indicated in this opinion; no costs to be taxed by either party, the appellants to pay the clerk’s fees in this court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: May 5, 2009
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**
 
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wendy F. DiCicco,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:
      May 10, 2005
    /s/
      Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
      Wendy
      F. DiCicco, CPA
      Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Balance Sheet and Statements of Income for the 3 months ended March
31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         148,652
<SECURITIES>                                   250,477
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,720,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (426,210)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,692,920
<PP&E>                                       1,079,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,340,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,821,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    686,760
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (614,612)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,340,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               760,374
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               313,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             409,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (88,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (32,678)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 02 8 . MI ONA MCBRI D E v . CHARLES W I LLI A MS.

Th e A p p el lan t ’ s M o t i o n t i t l ed W i t h d rawal o f Ap p eal , fi l ed i n t h e ab o v e-s t y l ed

cas e, i s h ereb y

GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## February 06, 2018

02/06/2018
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff Postpones February 5 Predecisional Enforcement Conference with Centerior Service Company

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT 

February 3, 1997

No. 97-11-III

******************************************************************************

NOTE TO EDITORS: MEETING POSTPONED

******************************************************************************

NRC STAFF POSTPONES FEBRUARY 5 PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

WITH CENTERIOR SERVICE COMPANY

The predecisional enforcement conference between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and Centerior Service Company officials, planned for Wednesday (February 5) in the NRC Region III Office, Lisle, Illinois, has been postponed.

The conference will be rescheduled later.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021