4312 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2All six Commissioners voted in the affirmative. 

alleged to be subsidized by the 

Governments of China and Indonesia. 

Unless the Department of Commerce 

extends the time for initiation pursuant 

to sections 702(c)(1)(B) or 732(c)(1)(B) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671a(c)(1)(B) or 

1673a(c)(1)(B)), the Commission must 

reach a preliminary determination in 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

investigations in 45 days, or in this case 

by Monday, March 9, 2015. The 

Commission’s views must be 

transmitted to Commerce within five 

business days thereafter, or by Monday, 

March 16, 2015. 

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these investigations and 

rules of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: Wednesday, 

January 21, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nathanael N. Comly ((202) 205–3174), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. These investigations are 

being instituted in response to a petition 

filed on Wednesday, January 21, 2015, 

by United Steel, Paper and Forestry, 

Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied 

Industrial and Service Workers 

International Union, Pittsburg, PA; 

Domtar Corporation, Ft. Mill, SC; Finch 

Paper LLC, Glen Falls, NY; P.H. 

Glatfelter Company, York, PA; and 

Packaging Corporation of America, Lake 

Forest, IL. 

Participation in the investigation and 

public service list. Persons (other than 

petitioners) wishing to participate in the 

investigations as parties must file an 

entry of appearance with the Secretary 

to the Commission, as provided in 

sections 201.11 and 207.10 of the 

Commission’s rules, not later than seven 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Industrial users 

and (if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level) 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping duty and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to these investigations 

upon the expiration of the period for 

filing entries of appearance. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list. Pursuant to section 

207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the 

Secretary will make BPI gathered in 

these investigations available to 

authorized applicants representing 

interested parties (as defined in 19 

U.S.C. 1677(9)) who are parties to the 

investigations under the APO issued in 

the investigations, provided that the 

application is made not later than seven 

days after the publication of this notice 

in the Federal Register. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Conference. The Commission’s 

Director of Investigations has scheduled 

a conference in connection with these 

investigations for 9:30 a.m. on 

Wednesday, February 11, 2015, at the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

Building, 500 E Street SW., Washington, 

DC. Requests to appear at the conference 

should be emailed to William.bishop@

usitc.gov and Sharon.bellamy@usitc.gov 

(DO NOT FILE ON EDIS) on or before 

Monday, February 9, 2015. Parties in 

support of the imposition of 

countervailing and antidumping duties 

in these investigations and parties in 

opposition to the imposition of such 

duties will each be collectively 

allocated one hour within which to 

make an oral presentation at the 

conference. A nonparty who has 

testimony that may aid the 

Commission’s deliberations may request 

permission to present a short statement 

at the conference. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

sections 201.8 and 207.15 of the 

Commission’s rules, any person may 

submit to the Commission on or before 

Tuesday, February 17, 2015, a written 

brief containing information and 

arguments pertinent to the subject 

matter of the investigations. Parties may 

file written testimony in connection 

with their presentation at the conference 

no later than three days before the 

conference. If briefs or written 

testimony contain BPI, they must 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. Please consult the 

Commission’s rules, as amended, 76 FR 

61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the 

Commission’s Handbook on Filing 

Procedures, 76 FR 62092 (Oct. 6, 2011), 

available on the Commission’s Web site 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the investigations 

must be served on all other parties to 

the investigations (as identified by 

either the public or BPI service list), and 

a certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Authority: These investigations are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.12 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 22, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01417 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–510 and 731– 

TA–1245 (Final)] 

Calcium Hypochlorite From China 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) 

and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (‘‘the Act’’), that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of calcium hypochlorite from China, 

provided for in subheadings 2828.10.00, 

3808.94.50, or 3808.99.95 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States, that have been found by 

the Department of Commerce to be sold 

in the United States at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’), and to be subsidized by 

the government(s) of China.2

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective December 18, 

2013, following receipt of a petition 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by Arch Chemicals, Inc., a 

Lonza Company, Atlanta, GA. The final 

phase of the investigations was 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4313 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of calcium hypochlorite from 

China were subsidized within the 

meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and dumped within the 

meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on August 

29, 2014 (79 FR 51605). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on November 

25, 2014, and all persons who requested 

the opportunity were permitted to 

appear in person or by counsel. 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determinations in these 

investigations on January 21, 2015. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 4515 (January 

2015), entitled Calcium Hypochlorite 

from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 

510 and 731–TA–1245 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 21, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01378 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–945] 

Certain Network Devices, Related 

Software and Components Thereof (II); 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 19, 2014, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems, 

Inc. of San Jose, California. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain network 

devices, related software and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,023,853 (‘‘the ’853 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 6,377,577 (‘‘the ’577 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,460,492 (‘‘the 

’492 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,061,875 

(‘‘the ’875 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,224,668 (‘‘the ’668 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 8,051,211 (‘‘the ’211 patent’’), 

and alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and a cease and 

desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Institution 

of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1337. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2014). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 20, 2015, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain network devices, 

related software and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 46–52, 54, 56, and 59– 

63 of the ’853 patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 7– 

10, 12–16, 18–22, 25, and 28–31 of the 

’577 patent; claims 1–4, 9–14, 17, and 

18 of the ’492 patent; claims 1–4, 10–13, 

and 15 of the ’875 patent; claims 1–10, 

12, 13, 15–28, 30, 31, 33–43, 45–49, 51– 

64, 66, 67, and 69–72 of the ’668 patent; 

and claims 1, 2, 6–9, 12, 13, and 17–20 

of the ’211 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Cisco 

Systems, Inc., 170 W Tasman Drive, San 

Jose, CA 95134. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Arista Networks, Inc., 5453 Great 

America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 

95054. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge, and the 

Chief Administrative Law Judge is 

authorized to consider whether to 

consolidate Inv. No. 337–TA–944 with 

Inv. No. 337–TA–945, and to 

consolidate them if he deems it 

appropriate. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES