alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH FORM 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          (43,813)
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,499,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                515,673
<PP&E>                                           39,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (26,569)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,975,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,468,819
<BONDS>                                         284,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,392
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,770,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,975,020
<SALES>                                         121,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                336,166
<CGS>                                            95,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                120,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 115,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    115,746
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .001



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Union Drilling, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), A.J. Verdecchia, Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ A.J. VerdecchiaName: Title:

A.J. Verdecchia Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer
and TreasurerDate:

March 12, 2009
#### Julian Kheel et al., Respondents, v Continental Baking Company, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 952]

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that Sanford Liebschutz, Esq., and the law firm of Chamberlain, D’Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield (Chamberlain firm) should be disqualified from further representation of defendant. Plaintiffs are part owners of premises leased to defendant since 1962. They commenced this action seeking judgment declaring that defendant breached the,lease by using the premises in violation of applicable zoning laws and regulations. Liebschutz represented plaintiffs in the negotiation and execution of the lease in 1962, personally drafting it. He continued to represent plaintiffs on various matters involving the leased property and interpretations of the lease until at least 1986, and he currently represents the Estate of Morris Rock, another part owner of the premises. In November 1994 Liebschutz joined the Chamberlain firm, which has represented defendant throughout the present dispute, and plaintiffs promptly moved to disqualify Liebschutz and the firm.

"If an attorney has represented a client in an earlier matter and then attempts to represent another in a substantially related matter which is adverse to the interests of the former client, the presumption of disqualification is irrebuttable” *(Solow v Grace & Co.,*83 NY2d 303, 313). Liebschutz’s prior representation of plaintiffs is substantially related to the interpretation and enforcement of the lease, the subject matter of the present litigation *(see, Matter of Salzler,*170 AD2d 1002). Thus, the court did not err in disqualifying Liebschutz without a hearing. The court also did not err in disqualifying the Chamberlain firm without a hearing; disqualification of the firm was required to avoid the appearance of impropriety *(see, Cardinale v Golinello,*43 NY2d 288). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Frazee, J. — Disqualification of Law Firm.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Glen Martinez, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 697]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, entered October 8, 2003 in Orleans County [James P Punch, A.J.]) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ordered that said proceeding be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Free v Coombe,*234 AD2d 996 [1996]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01440-CV

JAMES KIRBY, ET AL., Appellants

V.

UNITED TOWS, L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06767



### ORDER

We DENY as moot appellees’ December 10, 2014 mo tion to dismiss the appeal for lack

of appellate jurisdiction.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statments.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       2,498,799
<DEPRECIATION>                               (258,509)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,769,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      2,111,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,910<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,769,973
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,022
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (23,247)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01<F3>
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant does not report using a classified Balance Sheet.
<F2>Amount represents Partners' equity.
<F3>Amounts represent earnings per unit of partnership interest.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
No. 86-6169.

#### Thompson *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and certiorari granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1730 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1730

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the protection of 
 community centers with religious affiliation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Religiously Affiliated 
Institutions Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION.

    Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after ``threat of 
        force,'' the following: ``including by threat of force against 
        religious real property,'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (5); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) if damage to or destruction of property results from 
        the acts committed in violation of this section, which damage 
        to or destruction of such property is in an amount that exceeds 
        $5,000, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment 
        for not more than 3 years, or both; and''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, or real property owned or leased by 
        a nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
The HONORABLE MARK W. BENNETT, United States District Judge for the

*

Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

1

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 97-3598

______________

Mufid Al-Din, also known as *

Charles A. Parker, *

*

Petitioner-Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United

States

* District Court for the

Western

Michael Bowersox, et al., * District of Missouri

*

*

Respondents-Appellants. *

___________

Submitted: March 9, 1998

 Filed: April 3, 1998

___________

Before MCMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge. *

___________

BENNETT, District Judge.
2

Respondents appeals from the district court’s order denying their

motion to dismiss Mufid Al-Din’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as

untimely under the one-year time limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(1). This appeal presents the same issue decided today by our

opinion in Nichols v. Bowersox, No. 97-3639 (8th Cir. 1998). For the

reasons set forth in Nichols, we affirm the district court’s determination

that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was timely filed. We express

no opinion on the issue of equitable tolling.

FAGG, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissent in Nichols v. Bowersox, No. 97-3639 (8th Cir. Apr. 3 , 1998), I

decline to join the panel's opinion in this case. I would apply the court's decision in Allen v. Dowd, 964 F.2d 745

(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 902 (1992), reject Al-Din's habeas petition, and request en banc review.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18
U.S.C. § 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), Vincent A Wasik and Edward W. Stone,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Velocity Express Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Velocity Express
Corporation as of the dates presented and the results of operations of Velocity
Express Corporation for the periods presented.








/s/ VINCENT A. WASIKVincent A. WasikChairman of the Board
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Edward W. StoneEdward.
      W. StoneChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      May 12, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Velocity Express Corporation and will be retained by Velocity Express
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3 Version 5m5 Using Inadvertent Safety Injection Incident Data of Kori Unit 3 Plant (NUREG/IA-0105)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0105 (PDF 1.36 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1993

**Prepared by:**K. T. Kim, B. D. Chung, I. G. Kim, H. J. Kim

Korea Institute of Nuclear SafetyP. O. Box 16Daeduk-DanjiTaejon, Korea, 305–606

**Prepared as part of:**The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchangeunder the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessmentand Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An inadvertent safety injection incident occurred at Kori Unit 3 in September 6, 1990 was analyzed using the RELAP5/MOD3 code. The event was initiated by a closure of main feedwater control valve of one of three steam generators. High pressure safety injection system was actuated by the low pressure signal of main steam line.

The actual sequence of plant transient with the proper estimations of operator actions was investigated in the present calculation. The asymmetric loop behaviors of the plant was also considered by nodalizing the loops of the plant into three.

The calculational results are compared with the plant transient data. It is shown that the overall plant transient depends strongly on the auxiliary feedwater flowrate controlled by the operator and that the code gives an acceptable prediction of the plant behavior with the proper assumptions of the operator actions. The results also show that the solidification of pressurizer is not occurred and the liquid-vapor mixture does not flow out through pressurizer PORV. The behavior of primary pressure during pressurizer PORV actuation is poorly predicted because the actual behavior of pressurizer PORV could not be modelled in the present simulation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Transient Analysis of the Research Reactor MARIA MC Fuel Elements Using RELAP5 Mod 3.3

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0422 (PDF - 2.96 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2012**Date Published:** March 2013

**Prepared by:** M. Dabrowski, P. Domitr, E. Staron

Panstwowa Agencja Atomistyki (National Atomic Energy Agency) Krucza 36 00-522 Warszawa, POLAND

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The new fuel type in the Research Reactor ‘Maria’ is undergoing a test procedure. Thermalhydraulic calculations using RELAP have been applied in order to cross-check the results obtained using a specialized thermal-hydraulic ‘SN’ code. Nodalization of the fuel element has been developed and calculations have been performed. LOFA and RIA cases have been analysed and compared showing good agreement between the two codes.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         253,246
<SECURITIES>                                 6,215,417
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,136,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    660,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,509,396
<PP&E>                                       8,440,980
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,275,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,405,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,202,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,459
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,882,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,405,869
<SALES>                                      3,206,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,265,809
<CGS>                                        2,438,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,380,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,024,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,024,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,024,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
No. 90-6300.

#### Presley *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of Inadvertent Pressurizer Spray Valve Opening Real Transient with RELAP5/MOD3.2 (NUREG/IA-0194)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0194 (PDF 2.86 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** January 2001

**Prepared by:** J. Blanco, L. Rebollo, E. Moralo, J. Pindado, P. Moreno

UNESA C/ Francisco Gervas No. 3 28020 Madrid SPAIN

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents the comparison between the simulation results and the plant measurements of an actual event that took place in Jose Cabrera Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) in August 30, 1984. The event was originated by a continuous and inadvertent opening of the pressurizer spray valve.

Jose Cabrera NPP is a 510 Mwth single loop Westinghouse PWR owned by UNION ELECTRICA FENOSA, S.A. (UNION FENOSA), a Spanish utility that participates in the Code Application and Maintenance Project (CAMP) as a member of UNIDAD ELECTRICA, S.A. (UNESA). 

 The simulation has been carried out with the RELAP5/MOD3.2 code, running on a Digital AlphaServer 2000 4/200 computer under DIGITAL-UNIX operating system. 

 The main phenomena of the transient have been calculated correctly and some conclusions about the performance of new models and correlations incorporated in the MOD3.2 version, have been obtained. Several considerations about spray modelling in RELAP5/MOD3.2 are given. Additionally, a comparison with the MOD2.5 version results has shown some improvements and shortcomings of the new version. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 90-5309.

#### Mathews *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Byram and others, Receivers, Appellants, vs. Tax Commission of Wisconsin, Respondent.

*June 5*

June *24, 1929.*

For the appellants there were briefs by *Hoyt, Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Hoyt*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Ralph M. Hoyt.*

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Franklin E. Bump,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Bump.*

Rosenberry,'C. J.

This case is ruled by the companion case of *Chicago & Northwestern R. Co. v. Wisconsin Tax Comm.,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 368, 226 N. W. 293). The mandate in this case' is the same as in that case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.