alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 203/16/2015 17:37:57

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palo Verde 2 Docket (050- 00529)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

160 - No communication / information not communicated L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

160 - No communication / information not communicated O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

313

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content G - Engineering G - Design 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

313

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

417

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

183 - Pre-job activities LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 183 - Pre-job activities LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

1043

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 2 of 203/16/2015 17:37:57

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palo Verde 2 Docket (050- 00529)

Procedures & Reference Document / LER112 - Procedure / reference document contains human factors deficienc T - Testing 

O - Operations

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER183 - Pre-job activities LTA O - Operations T - Testing 

196 - Independent verification / plant tours LTA O - Operations T - Testing 

29

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 23
No: II-19-038 November 20, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Proposes $145,000 Civil Penalty to Tennessee Valley Authority

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed the assessment of a $145,000 civil 

penalty to the Tennessee Valley Authority for submitting incomplete and inaccurate information to 

the NRC that was material in a licensing decision at the Watts Bar nuclear plant.

TVA has admitted to the Severity Level III violation but can contest the assessment of the 

civil penalty through alternative dispute resolution, involving an independent mediator, if it 

chooses.

An NRC inspection completed on Aug. 1, 2019, concluded that TVA, on multiple occasions 

as part of the licensing of Watts Bar Unit 2, and also as part of a license amendment request for 

Watts Bar Unit 1, submitted incomplete and inaccurate information to the NRC regarding the 

adequacy of an offsite electric power system.

TVA inaccurately reported to the NRC from July 2010 to January 2015 that two common 

service station transformers could be counted on as qualified sources of offsite power to be used for 

accident mitigation. An NRC inspection team identified that the transformers lacked adequate 

capacity to provide power to safety-related equipment in certain accident scenarios.

The violation did not result in any negative consequences, and TVA has since instituted 

corrective actions to prevent a recurrence of the violation.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0005595

29-JAN-2015

07:46 AM
# L_2015275EN.01006801.xml

| 20.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/68

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2014 of 8 September 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 271 of 12 September 2014
  )

On page 9, Annex, entry No 4 concerning Gennadiy Nikolaiovych TSYPKALOV, column headed ‘Identifying information’:

for:

‘Born on 6.21.1973’,

read:

‘Born on 21.6.1973
  ’.

---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Protection of Safeguards Information: Requirements for Tribes Participating in the Advance Notification of Irradiated Reactor Fuel Shipments (NUREG/BR-0362)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - General Requirement

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0362 (PDF - 710.56 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published: October 2012**

Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## General Requirement

Information and material that meets the criteria set forth in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 73.21, "Protection of Safeguards Information: Performance Requirements," must be protected from unauthorized disclosure. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has determined that the information contained in the advance notification for shipments of irradiated reactor fuel and certain nuclear wastes is designated as Safeguards Information (SGI) due to its security significance. Each person who produces, receives, or acquires SGI shall ensure that it is protected against unauthorized disclosure. To meet this requirement, organizations and persons shall establish, implement, and maintain a system to protect SGI consistent with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR 73.21.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### JOHN DOUGHERTY *v.*WILLIAM STEPP.

Every unauthorised intrusion into the land of another, is a sufficient trespass to support an action for *breaking the*close, whether the land he actually enclosed or not. And from every such entry the law infers some damage; if nothing more, the treading down the grass or shrubbery.

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, tried at Buncombe on the last Circuit, before his Honor Judge Martin. The only proof introduced by the plaintiff to establish an act of trespass, was, that the defendant had entered on the unenclosed land of the plaintiff, with a surveyor and chain carriers, and actually surveyed a part of it, claiming it as his own, but without marking trees or cutting bushes. This, his Honor held not to be a trespass, and the jury under his instructions, found a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Mendenhall*for the plaintiff, contended, that every unwarrantable entry on another man’s soil, is considered a trespass by *breaking his close;*for that in contemplation of law, every man’s land, is separated and set apart from his neighbour’s, by either a material, or invisible and ideal boundary; and that every entry carries with it some damage, if no other, the treading down and bruising the herbage and shrubbery. That whenever a man has a *right to enclose his estate,*by a real substantial fence, the law regards it as already enclosed against the unauthor-ised intrusion of his neighbour. In illustration and support of these positions, he cited 3 Bla. Com. 209. 6 Bac. Ab 581, title Trespass. *MKinzie’s Executors*v. *Hidet,*N. C. Term Rep. 181. Hammond’s N. Prius, 151, J52. I)y;er, 225, *b.*pi. 40. '

••Mb counsel appeared for the defendant.

*372Ruffin, Chief Justice.

— In the opinion of the Court, there is error in the instructions given to the jury. The amount of damages may depend on the acts done on the land, and the extent of injury to it therefrom. But it is an elementary principle, that every unauthorised, and therefore unlawful entry, into the close of another, is a trespass. From every such entry against the will of the possessor, the law infers some damage; if nothing more, the treading down the grass or the herbage, or as here, the shrubbery. Had the *locus in quo*been under cultivation or enclosed, there would, have been no doubt of the plaintiff’s right to recover. Now our Courts have *for*a long time past held, that if there be no adverse possession, the title makes the land the owner’s *dose.*Making the survey and marking trees,' or making it without marking, differ only in the degree, and not in the nature of the injury. It is the entry that constitutes the trespass. There is no statute, nor rule of reason, that will make a wilful entry into the land of another, upon an unfounded claim of right, innocent, .which one, who sat up no title to the land, could not justify or excuse. On the contrary, the pretended ownership aggravates the wrong. Let the judgment be reversed, and a new trial granted.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2001

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
No. 82-5884.

#### Smith *v.*General Motors Acceptance Corp.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 172 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 172

 To restore the Free Speech and First Amendment rights of churches and 
     exempt organizations by repealing the 1954 Johnson Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restore the Free Speech and First Amendment rights of churches and 
     exempt organizations by repealing the 1954 Johnson Amendment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE 1954 JOHNSON AMENDMENT BANNING THE FREE SPEECH 
              AND FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CHURCHES AND EXEMPT 
              ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 501(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to list of exempt organizations) is 
amended by striking ``, and which does not participate in, or intervene 
in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any 
political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for 
public office''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Campaign Finance Laws Unaffected.--The amendments made by this 
section shall not invalidate or limit any provision of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1428 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1428

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
```
TO: Docket: EPA action on Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan 

FROM: Ann Lyons 

DATE: September 27, 2011 

RE: Meeting with Sierra Club Stop Coal Campaign Representatives 

Participants: 

 Bruce Nilles, Sierra Club 

 Suma Peesapati, Earthjustice 

 Deborah Jordan, EPA Region Air Division Director 

 Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9 Office of Regional Counsel 

 

Bruce Nilles requested the meeting. EPA indicated we would place a memorandum of the 

meeting in the open docket on EPA’s approval of the Nevada Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan submittal. 

Sierra Club indicated that the coal fired power plant fleet in the US is being shutdown and 

cleaned up, citing examples in Oregon and Washington States that have announced retirement. 

Sierra Club also indicated that the EPA regional office in region 6 has been more rigorous 

regarding Best Available Retrofit Technology than Region 9 proposed to approve as Nevada 

Division of Environmental Protection’s BART determination for the Reid Gardner Generating 

Station. Deborah Jordan pointed out the distinction between promulgating a Federal 

Implementation Plan and approving a State’s submittal of a State Implementation Plan. 

The meeting ended after approximately 30 minutes.
No. 90-6217.

#### Robbins *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel R. DeFazio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Daniel R. DeFazioDaniel R. DeFazio Chief Financial Officer November 21, 2005
#### Village of Shorewood, Respondent, vs. City of Milwaukee and another, Appellants.

*April 4*

May *1, 1923.*

See *West Allis v. Milwaukee, ante,*p. 512.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *John M. Niven,*city at*520torney, and *Walter. J. Mattison,*assistant city attorney, and opal argument by *Mr. Mattison.*

*Charles B. Hammersley*of Milwaukee, village attorney, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, J.

The appeal in this case presents a-situation substantially similar to that in *City of West Allis v. City of Milwaukee, ante,*p. 512, 193 N. W. 362, decided herewith, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from will be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.
No. 82-980.

#### Sadlak *v.*Celeste, Governor of Ohio, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered December 3 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00476
- CR JIMMY JONES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 16
- 15371
- R

O RDER
Before the Court is the S tate ’ s November 30, 2020 second motion for an
extension o f time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State ’ s brief due by December 29 , 2020

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
No. 86-763.

#### Spurlock *v.*Wren.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 82-5960.

#### Smart *v.*Allsbrook, Superintendent, Odom Complex, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (NUREG/BR-0466)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0466 (PDF - 363.63 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2010

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Introduction

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 provided the framework for the widespread use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. The 1954 Act created the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission to both regulate nuclear power and to encourage the use of nuclear energy.

In 1974, the Energy Reorganization Act split the two functions of the Atomic Energy Commission. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was created to regulate the safe operation of commercial nuclear power and began operation on January 19, 1975. Initially, the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) was created to manage energy research and development, nuclear weapons, and naval reactors programs. In 1977, ERDA was combined with the Federal Energy Administration to form the U.S. Department of Energy.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         134,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    124,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,161
<PP&E>                                       5,797,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,890,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          703,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,642
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,630,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,890,284
<SALES>                                        413,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               413,174
<CGS>                                          390,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  829,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (537,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (537,391)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (281,676)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (819,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product
Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



Date: August 6, 2003



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Linda Baddour                    
|Linda Baddour Chief Financial Officer
No. 82-5923.

#### Wise *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
No. 82-5976.

#### Jenkins *v.*Jago et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.