alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.2 Post Test Analysis and Accuracy Quantification of SPES Test SP-SB-04 (NUREG/IA-0155)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0155 (PDF 6.18 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 1999

**Prepared by:** F. D'Auria M. Frogheri* W. Giannotti

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The present document deals with the Relap5/Mod3.2 analysis of the small break LOCA experiment SP-SB-04 performed in SPES facility.

SPES is a PWR simulator (Integral Test Facility) installed at SIET center in Piacenza (IT). Volume scaling and core power scaling factors are 1/427, with respect to the Westinghouse 900 MWe standard reactor.

The experiment is originated by a small break in the cold leg (2» equivalent break area in the plant) without the actuation of the high pressure injection system. The test starts from full power and is the counterpart of the test SP-SB-03, that started at an initial power roughly equal to 10% of nominal power. Low pressure injection system actuation occurs after core dry-out.

The Relap5 code has been extensively used at University of Pisa; the nodalization of SPES facility has, been qualified through the application of the version Relap5/Mod2 to the same experiment and another test performed in the same facility.

Sensitivity analyses have been addressed to the influence of several parameters (like discharge break coefficient, time of accumulators start etc.) upon the predicted transient evolution.

Qualitative and quantitative code calculation accuracy evaluation has been performed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. D-575.

#### In re Disbarment of Sickmen.

[For earlier order herein, see 478 U. S. 1038.]

Disbarment entered.
1

 
     (b) This Agreement constitutes the valid and binding obligations of Borrower, enforceableagainst Borrower in accordance with its respective terms, except as enforceability may be subjectto applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws now or hereafter ineffect relating to creditors’ rights, and to general principles of equity (regardless of whetherenforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law).     (c) After giving effect to this Agreement, no Event of Default, or event which with the lapseof time, the giving of notice or both, would constitute an Event of Default has occurred and iscontinuing, and after giving effect to this Agreement, the representations and warranties ofBorrower contained in the Business Loan Agreement and the other loan documents delivered pursuantthereto are true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof as if made on the datehereof.     Section 7. Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in anynumber of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which whenso executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original with the same effect as if all thesignatures were on the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of the signature pageto this Agreement by telecopier shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpartof this Agreement. Any party delivering an executed counterpart of the signature page to thisAgreement by telecopier shall thereafter promptly deliver a manually executed counterpart of thisAgreement, but the failure to deliver such manually executed counterpart shall not affect thevalidity, enforceability, and binding effect of this Agreement.     Section 8. Governing Law, Submission to Jurisdiction, and Waiver of JuryTrial/Arbitration.THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATEOF CALIFORNIA AND IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9.4 OF THE BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT,RELATING TO ARBITRATION AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL, THE PROVISIONS OF WHICH ARE BY THIS REFERENCEHEREBY INCORPORATED HEREIN IN FULL.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by theirrespective authorized signatories as of the date first above written.       BORROWER: CALAVO GROWERS, INC.           By: /s/ Scott H. Runge            /s/ James Snyder           Name: SCOTT H. RUNGE         JAMES SNYDER    Title: TREASURER                  CONTROLLER         BANK: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.           By: /s/ Christine Young           Name: Christine Young    Title: Sr. Credit Products Analyst  
2
#### State, Appellant, vs. Benz, Respondent.

*October 11, 1940*

January *7, 1941.*

*391The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Fred M. Wylie*of Madison, and for the respondent on that of *Minahan<& Bassett,*attorneys, and *Robert C. Bassett*of counsel, all of Green Bay.

Rosenberry, C. J.

What is really sought in this case is an overruling of the holding in *State ex rel. Attorney General v. Manske*(1939), 231 Wis. 16, 285 N. W. 378. In that case in a similar action it was held that whether a court should issue a temporary restraining order pending judgment is a matter resting in the sound judicial discretion of the trial court. Under the circumstances we are not disposed at this time to review this question. The injunction not having been issued, there has been no violation, and “standards” having been held to be invalid, the question is now moot.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

March 16, 2007

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Certification Required Under Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Earl W. McNiel, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Earl W. McNiel                        
|Earl W. McNiel                            
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC to Hold Informal Public Hearing on Petition to Revoke, Modify or Suspend Operating License for D.C. Cook Plant

----

----

No. 98-124

July 23, 1998

**NRC TO HOLD INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING ON PETITION TO REVOKE,MODIFY OR SUSPEND OPERATING LICENSE FOR D.C. COOK PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold an informal public hearing August 19 in Rockville, Maryland, on a petition that asks NRC to revoke, modify or suspend the operating license of the D.C. Cook nuclear power plant, Units 1 and 2. The plant is located near Benton Harbor, Michigan.

The hearing will be held at 9 a.m. on August 19 in Rooms T-09A1-T-09F5 at the NRC headquarters at theTwo White Flint North building , 11545 Rockville Pike.

The hearing will be held in response to a petition filed October 9, 1997 by the Union of Concerned Scientists regarding safety problems with the ice condenser containment at the D.C. Cook plant. The system uses thousands of pounds of ice to absorb heat energy released during certain accident conditions. The petition was amended January 12, presenting additional information on six other concerns at the plant. It seeks revocation, modification or suspension of the D.C. Cook operating license until NRC has reasonable assurance that the plant meets the design commitments made when the license was issued.

The hearing is intended to provide additional information from the petitioner, the licensee, Indiana/Michigan Power Company, and the public for NRC staff to evaluate the petition. Members of the public who are interested in making presentations should contact John Stang of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation at (301) 415-1345.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### In re Raymond (NMN) HAMA, Jr., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00156-N.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E. D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

Jan. 19, 1982.

*731Ashton H. Pully, Jr., Virginia Beach, Va., for debtor.

Stuart D. Glasser, Glasser & Glasser, Norfolk, Va., for Virginia Nat. Bank.

A PRACTICAL OPINION AND ORDER

HAL J. BONNEY, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

What happens when a debtor has made payments under a section 524(c) agreement which the Court will not approve?

When Raymond Hama, Jr., filed bankruptcy on February 6, 1981, he possessed a 1979 Ford Thunderbird motor vehicle for which he was indebted to the secured creditor, Virginia National Bank, in the sum of $8,354.62. Since he desired to retain the vehicle, he entered into an agreement with the bank to do so pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 524(c). This was on March 31st.

Since a debtor must attend a discharge hearing, 11 U.S.C. 524(d), the Court usually sets at the same time the hearing for consideration of approval of any agreements between a holder of a claim and the debtor. 11 U.S.C. 524(c). At said hearing on June 22nd, the Court refused to approve the agreement finding it was not in the debtor’s best interest so to do. 11 U.S.C. 524(c)(4)(A)(ii).

The debtor returned the vehicle to the bank on July 1st.

In the interim, since the filing of his bankruptcy, the debtor continued to make the monthly payments of $230.1 These payments were made by military allotment which the debtor continued to facilitate the agreement entered into with the bank.

Since the Court did not approve the agreement, the debtor has now filed an application for full return of the funds paid in the interim.2

The Court finds that $230 is a just and reasonable monthly rental charge for use of a 1979 Thunderbird and the application for return of funds is denied.

A creditor is entitled to reasonable compensation for the use of the vehicle and for the probable decrease in the value of its collateral.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. In seminars conducted for attorneys and for creditors just prior to the effective date of the Bankruptcy Code, October 1, 1979, the question was often asked as to what would be done with the funds should an agreement not be approved.

The Court advised that since considerable time would probably lapse between entering into the agreement and its consideration by the Court, *and*since most such agreements would by their very nature be approved, the terms of the agreement might be applied upon signing with an adjustment by the Court in the instances where disapproval resulted.

This practical approach has worked well and this is the first of thousands of cases to present the issue.

2

. The bank refunded those funds received subsequent to surrender of the vehicle on July 1st.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K of Hub International Limited (the "Company") dated February 25, 2007 containing the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Martin P. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                         |  |                        
|---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By:                                      |  | /S/    MARTIN P. HUGHES
|Martin P. Hughes Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 25, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of  LONE MOUNTAIN GOLD CORP.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB /A, 1st Amendment , for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Kevin
Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date:  September
5, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; SBIR--Review of Novel Methods for Protein 
Delivery.
    Date: February 19, 2015.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7196, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Stephanie J. Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0291 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6d5d2c3d6cec7c8cfc388d1c3c4c4e6c8cfce88c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55262130253d343b3c307b22303737153b3c3d7b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01365 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Long-Term Research Program (NUREG/BR-0506)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Background

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0506 (PDF - 1.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** December 2012

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Background

The Long-Term Research Program (LTRP) supports anticipated future (beyond 5 years) NRC regulatory needs1 by providing fundamental insights and information to address potential technical issues or identified gaps in the NRC’s regulations or infrastructure. The program is managed by the Accident Analysis Branch in the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES). Staff in the NRC’s program offices (e.g., reactor or materials oversight) offer proposals for long-term research.

LTRP projects generally last 1 to 2 years and are feasibility or scoping studies that assess whether future research on the topic should be pursued as part of the NRC’s normal planning and budgeting process.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the Radon Barriers Workshop (NUREG/CP-0312)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG CP-0312 (PDF – 20.22 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2019**Date Published:** August 2019

**Prepared by:** Prepared by: Mark Fuhrmann1, Craig Benson2, Jody Waugh3, Morgan Williams4, and Hans Arlt1

1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission2 University of Virginia3 Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc.4 University of California Berkeley

Mark Fuhrmann, NRC Project Manager

 Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The "Radon Barriers Project" is a research program to study the effects of changes in the properties of in-service engineered earthen covers over uranium mill tailings as these covers age. Field studies were conducted at four mill tailing disposal sites: Falls City in Texas, Bluewater in New Mexico, Shirley Basin South in Wyoming, and Lakeview in Oregon. Small areas on these sites were excavated, radon fluxes were measured, numerous observations were made, and samples were taken for a variety of parameters, such as saturated hydraulic conductivity, root counts, moisture, density, lead-210 concentrations, soil texture, structure, chemistry, and nematode counts.

On July 25–26, 2018, a one-and-a-half-day workshop took place at NRC Headquarters to discuss findings from the project with regard to the current state of the barriers and comparison to their as-built condition and natural analog sites, prediction of long-term evolution, monitoring approaches, and long-term implications. Presentations included detailed background and project findings on the following:
        -  NRC and DOE/LM activities that led to the Radon Barriers Project 
        -  radon fluxes and their variability, radon diffusion coefficients, and radon travel times through the covers 
        -  hydraulic conductivity of the barriers at various depths and comparisons to hydraulic conductivity at nearby natural analog sites 
        -  ecological evolution of covers and the impact of vegetation on cover properties, especially on water percolation, radon flux, and evapotranspiration 
        -  soil architecture observations, including soil structure, biology, and chemistry 
        -  potential use of lead-210 as a long-term indicator of radon transport within barriers 

A facilitated discussion followed each presentation to discuss long-term evolution of the sites as suggested by the project findings, use of the findings for maintenance and prediction, future information needs, and policy implications.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 31.1Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.(the “Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005   /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ     Dennis J. Tietz  President of CCC  (Chief Executive Officer)
No. 91-6332.

#### Bender *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.