alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2004

January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
May 9 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIMOTHY CASTRO , JR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 01087

- CV V.

MARGARET CASTRO , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of ap pellee, Margaret Castro, signed September 16, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to (1) delete the clause providing that Timothy’s obligation for Matthew and Stephanie’s expenses is non

- dischargeable under section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code and (2) award Margaret’s attorney’s fees directly to Mar garet rather than to her attorney. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment. We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance

.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of February, 2005.

| | /s/ Calvin L. Kantonen 
Calvin L. Kantonen
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS PREPARED FOR USE BY THE UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ONLY, AND IS UNAUDITED.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          44,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,095<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,392,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,683,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      2,136,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           99,923<F3>     
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,553<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,683,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,596    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,795)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70<F5>
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE STATED NET OF ALLOWANCES AND INCLUDE ACCRUED REVENUES ALSO.
<F2>THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP DOES NOT USE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F3>INDICATES PREFERRED UNITS.
<F4>THE REGISTRANT IS A PARTNERSHIP.  THE AMOUNT REPORTED IS PARTNERS' EQUITY.
<F5>AMOUNTS ARE ACTUALLY EARNINGS PER UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# Note to Editors: ACRS Reports Received

----

----

No. 99-91 April 30, 1999

**NOTE TO EDITORS:**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received two reports from its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the Committee's meeting April 7-10. The reports provide comments on:
        - Proposed revisions to the NRC generic communications process; and
        - Status of resolution of steam generator tube integrity issues.

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC's Office of Public Affairs, the NRC's homepage.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
October 15, 2015

Exemption No. 11390A Regulatory Docket No

. FAA− 2014

– 1025

Mr. Craig Byrom

21234 Branford Hills Lane Katy, TX 77450

Dear Mr. Byrom :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the docket August 12, 2015 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from
§§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform

aerial data collection

. You requested an amendment to conduct closed

- set motion pictur e and television filming to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

u nmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11390 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add closed

- set motion picture and television filming to its UAS operations.2

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11390 remain in effect exc ept
as follows. Condition No. 2 has been update d to permit closed

- set motion picture and television filming

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

2. Operations for the pur pose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming

are permitted.

T his exemption terminates on April 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
#### Coogan and others, Respondents, vs. City of Watertown, Appellant.

*May 12*

October *13, 1931.*

*431For the appellant there was a brief by *R. W. Lueck*of Watertown, city attorney, and *Olin & Butler*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *R. M. Rieser*of Madison.

*W. N. Powers*of Beaver Dam, for the respondents.

The following opinion was filed June 12, 1931:

Nelson, J.

This case is ruled by the decision announced this day in *Christoph v. City of Chilton, ante,*p. 418, 237 N. W. 134, wherein it is held that sec. 62.075, Stats., as enacted by ch. 353 of the Laws of 1929, is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county is reversed, with directions to dismiss the petition.

Owen, Fritz, and Wickhem, JJ., dissent.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on October 13, 1931.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Markenzy Momperusse, Also Known as Mark Watson, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 526]

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), both rendered January 6, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1464/92 and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 7474/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

*609We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.4 Page 1 of 1

8/22/08

AD Title: Rolls-Royce Propeller Shafts

Docket No. FAA-2009-0082 Directorate Identifier: 2008-NE-42-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Nacelle 

removal/installation 

from A/C 

14.0 $1,120.00 $1,120.00 659 $738,080

Engine/PGB 

removal/installation 

from nacelle

6.0 $ 480.00 $ 480.00 659 $316,320

Disassemble, inspect 

and reassemble PGB 50.0 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 659 $2,636,000

Rework prop shaft 14.0 $1,120.00 $1,120.00 659 $738,080

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $4,428,480

Costs covered under warranty

Special considerations for Economic Analysis:

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# NRC Names New Resident Inspector at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

----

----

**NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT THE PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of Steve Caudill as an NRC Resident Inspector at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio.

The plant, which processes uranium for its use as fuel in commercial nuclear power plants, is operated by the U.S. Enrichment Corporation and owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. The NRC has two full-time resident inspectors at the plant.

Caudill, an NRC employee since 1991, began his duties at the plant December 18. Before his recent assignment, he worked in the NRC's headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland, as a nuclear material control and accounting inspector.

Prior to joining the NRC, Caudill worked in the Engineering Department at Browning Manufacturing in Maysville, Kentucky. He earned a bachelor's degree in physics from Georgetown College. Caudill and his wife Usha live in Portsmouth, Ohio.

Caudill joins Senior Resident Inspector David Hartland at the Portsmouth plant. They can be reached at (740) 289-3353.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of CABLE NET INC. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Marasco,
      President of the Company and Maria Marasco, Secretary Treasurer of the Company
      ,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March
      15,
      2007


/s/ Maria
              Marasco
            
            
            /s/ Frank
              MarascoName:
              Maria
              MarascoTitle: Secretary Treasurer
            
            
            Name:
              Frank
              MarascoTitle: President
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1550 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1550

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters 
                   and emergency medical responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2017

 Mr. Reichert (for himself, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Meehan, Mr. 
Kind, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Renacci, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Lance, 
Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. DeFazio, Ms. 
 Pingree, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. 
 Swalwell of California, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. King of New 
York, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Bost, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. 
  Kilmer, Mr. Cole, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Courtney, Mr. 
Goodlatte, Ms. Esty, and Mrs. Walorski) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters 
                   and emergency medical responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Responder Incentive 
Protection Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY 
              MEDICAL RESPONDERS.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation on Qualified Payments.--
Subparagraph (B) of section 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$30'' and inserting ``$50''.
    (b) Reimplementing and Making Permanent Benefits.--
            (1) In general.--Section 139B of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (d).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by this subsection 
        shall apply with respect to taxable years beginning after 
        December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
EXTENDED STAY AMERICA INC.
 
EXHIBIT 11 --  Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
 
 
                                                 Three Month Period Ended
                                              ------------------------------
                                              March 31, 1997  March 31, 1996
                                              --------------  --------------
                                                                   (1)
PRIMARY:  
  Average shares outstanding..............            75,239          44,262
  Net effect of dilutive stock options - 
    based on the treasury stock method 
    using the average market price........             1,774             673
                                              --------------  --------------
                TOTAL.....................            77,013          44,935
                                              ==============  ==============
 
  Net income (loss).......................           $ 1,422            (429)
                                              ==============  ==============

  Net income (loss) per share.............           $  0.02           (0.01)
                                              ==============  ==============
 
FULLY DILUTED
  Average shares outstanding..............            75,239          44,262
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -- 
     based on the treasury stock method 
     using the greater of ending or                    1,774             673 
     average market price.................
 
 
                                              --------------  --------------
                TOTAL.....................            77,013          44,935
                                              ==============  ==============
 
Net income (loss).........................           $ 1,422            (429)
                                              ==============  ==============
 
Net income (loss) per share...............           $  0.02           (0.01)
                                              ==============  ==============

(1) Amounts are restated to reflect the 2-for-1 stock split effected in July
    1996.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Seawright Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Joel Sens





Joel Sens,


Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer, and principal financial and accounting officer)





Date:  October 7, 2011
#### People v Marvin Pitsley, Defendant.

[632 NYS2d 374]

Motion to extend time to move for leave to appeal denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: Defendant’s time to make an application seeking leave to appeal does not begin to run until defendant is served with a copy of the order sought to be appealed *(see,*CPL 460.10 [4] [a]). Present — Green, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
No. 86-863.

#### Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services *v.*Kizer, Director of California Department of Health Services, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.
**Exhibit 10.2****Seventh Extension Agreement**This Seventh Extension Agreement is dated as of September 29, 2005 between TollgradeCommunications, Inc., having an address at 493 Nixon Road, Cheswick, PA 15024 (“Tollgrade”) andDictaphone Corporation, acting through its Electronic Manufacturing Services Division, with anaddress at 3900 W. Sarno Rd., Melbourne, FL 32934 (“Dictaphone”).**WHEREAS**, Tollgrade (as successor in interest to Acterna Corporation) and Dictaphone areparties to a Supply Agreement dated July 25, 2002, which sets forth the terms pursuant to whichDictaphone manufactures and supplies to Tollgrade, and Tollgrade purchases from Dictaphone, certainproducts (the “Supply Agreement”);**WHEREAS**, the Supply Agreement was initially scheduled to expire on July 24, 2004, and has beensuccessively extended through September 30, 2005;**WHEREAS**, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to replace the Supply Agreement with a new supplyagreement, but have not yet completed negotiations with respect to such new supply agreement; and**WHEREAS**, Tollgrade and Dictaphone desire to further extend the term of the Supply Agreementthrough December 31, 2005 or until a new supply agreement is executed, if sooner;**NOW THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises contained herein and for other good andvaluable consideration, the parties agree as follows:**1. ****Extension of Supply Agreement****.**The parties hereby agree that the Supply Agreementis hereby extended through December 31, 2005 or until such time as the parties execute a new supplyagreement, if sooner.**2. ****Miscellaneous****.**Except as extended hereby, the provisions of the Supply Agreementshall remain in full force and effect. This Seventh Extension Agreement will be governed in allrespects by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without reference to any choice of lawprovisions. This Seventh Extension Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and bythe different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall bedeemed an original, but all such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the date first above written.           **TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**   **DICTAPHONE CORPORATION**             By: /s/ Jennifer M. Reinke   By: /s/ James Davis             Name: Jennifer M. Reinke   Name: James Davis  Title: Assistant Secretary   Title: Sr. V.P., Operations  
46
No. 90-6237.

#### Flakes *v.*Wisconsin.

Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.