alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          294,398
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       1,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                297,751
<PP&E>                                          189,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  503,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,273
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                      493,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    503,525
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,913
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                        966
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .04
        
                                  


</TABLE>
[4910-13-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-++++; Directorate Identifier 2010-l\TJ\1-018-ADl

RIN 2120-AA64

Ain\'orthiness Directives; Transport Category Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Depaliment of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

paper or linen waste receptacles. The existing AD currently requires installation of

placards prohibiting smoking in the lavatory and disposal of cigarettes in the lavatory

waste receptacles; establishment of a procedure to announce to airplane occupants that

smoking is prohibited in the lavatories; installation of ashtrays at certain locations; and ",,!iT'NC5Y"BO~

repetitive inspections to ensure that lavatory waste receptacle doors operate correctly. l~m~ISS'GM~;UI\"

This proposed revision to the AD would extend the time an airplane may be operated a .•n

with certain missing ashtrays. Thjs proposed reVision to the AD was prompted by the

detennillation that certain compliance times required by the existing AD could be

extended and still address fires occurring in lav'atories caused by among other things th

improper disposal of smoking materials in lavatory waste receptacles. The proposed

revision to the AD would continue to prevent p'ossible fires that could result from

smoking materials being dropped into lavatory paper or linen waste receptacles.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

I gnH'O~

Nfi-too

'r~~

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY

* U.S.aro, 1g9O-{l·7tI8·012120 '0'
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board's                     *ad hoc*                     Working Group on Administrative Burdens (AB), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. § 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:                

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, January 23, 12:00-1:00 p.m., EST.

# SUBJECT MATTER:

Chairman's remarks; update on NSF implementation of Uniform Guidance and Administrative Burdens Task Force recommendations; and draft comments on proposed National Institutes of Health multisite Institutional Review Board policy.

# STATUS:

Open.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference. A public listening line will be available. Members of the public must contact the Board Office (call 703-292-7000 or send an email message to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*) at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference for the public listening number. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) which may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*                         Point of contact for this meeting is Jacqueline Meszaros at                         *jmeszaro@nsf.gov.*

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-00894 Filed 1-15-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
No: 19-037 August 15, 2019

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

NRC and CNSC Sign Historic Memorandum to 

Enhance Technical Reviews of Advanced/Small Modular Reactor Technologies

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission today 

signed an historic Memorandum of Cooperation for both agencies to increase regulatory effectiveness 

through collaborative work on the technical reviews of advanced reactor and small modular reactor 

technologies.

The memorandum represents a uniquely important step in both countries’ strong commitment to 

a more effective, efficient, and timely analysis of next-generation technologies, and both agencies’

safety and security mission. The NRC and CNSC are building on the joint Memorandum of 

Understanding signed in August 2017, accelerating efforts to realize innovation in the review of 

advanced reactor and small modular reactor technology concepts.

“Today’s signing of this memorandum further shapes our commitment to open and 

transformative thinking with our Canadian partners, enhancing our willingness to work together on 

matters of advanced nuclear power safety developments while increasing regulatory effectiveness,” said 

NRC Chairman Kristine L. Svinicki. “Advanced technologies are emerging at a rapid pace, demanding 

that regulators keep in step with modernization initiatives and the technologies of the future.”

“Globally, interest and advances in small modular and advanced reactors are growing rapidly. 

The CNSC and the U.S. NRC are working together as regulatory leaders to ensure the development and 

deployment of these innovative technologies are done safely and efficiently,” said CNSC President and 

Chief Executive Officer Rumina Velshi. “The signing of this memorandum further strengthens our 

long-standing history of collaboration with our U.S. counterparts and ensures the effectiveness and 

efficiency of our regulatory oversight for the future.”

The MOC is the first of its kind between the U.S. and Canadian regulators on matters involving 

nuclear power development. Svinicki and Velshi announced in June that the two agencies would begin 

exploring enhanced bilateral cooperation through joint regulatory reviews of developing nuclear 

technologies, to include advanced reactors and small modular reactors.

According to the MOC, both the NRC and CNSC will work under the previously established 

steering committee to immediately begin developing the infrastructure needed to share and evaluate 

cooperative opportunities and best practices in the analysis of advanced reactor and small modular 

reactor designs. The MOC underscores the readiness of the U.S. NRC and CNSC to increase 

collaboration and facilitate joint technical reviews of advanced reactor and small modular reactor 

designs to ensure safety and support each agency’s regulatory decisions.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6266

JESSIE L. CREDLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-754-2)

Submitted: June 4, 1996 Decided: June 19, 1996

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie L. Credle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted an appeal from a magistrate judge's report and

recommendation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the report is not an appealable order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**NRC INSPECTION MANUAL**NSIR/DSO

INSPECTION MANUAL CHAPTER 2200, APPENDIX A

SECURITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROGRAM

Effective Date:  01/29/2019

2200-01	PURPOSE

This Appendix lists the inspectable areas within the Security Cornerstone and inspection procedures (IPs) to be used when reviewing the licensee construction programs, as outlined in Section 08.01 of Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2504, “Construction Inspection Program:  Inspection of Construction and Operational Programs.”  The purpose of these inspections is to verify that the licensee has programs established and implemented to:

1. Control security activities at the site;

2. Identify problems and resolve them;

3. Report deficiencies and identify failures;

4. Ensure design requirements are translated to construction documentation; and,

5. Ensure the adequacy of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) determination packages for submittal to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

2200-02	OBJECTIVES

02.01	To gather information to determine whether a licensee is meeting the security programs for construction inspection and operations cornerstone (Construction Reactor Oversight Process (cROP) Security Cornerstone).

02.02	To verify and assess the adequate implementation of licensee security construction and operational programs.

02.03	To identify those significant issues that may have generic applicability or cross-cutting applicability to other cROP cornerstones.

2200-03	APPLICABILITY

The program described in this IMC is applicable to all power reactors under construction that are subject to oversight under the NRC’s cROP.  The guidance in this IMC applies to all NRC personnel with responsibilities for oversight of security operations and programs at power reactors under construction.

2200-04	DEFINITIONS

Applicable definitions are found in IMC 2506, “Construction Reactor Oversight Process General Guidance and Basis Document.”

2200-05	RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES

Applicable responsibilities and authorities are found in IMC 2200, “Security Inspection Program for Construction.”

2200-06	REQUIREMENTS

Inspectable Areas within the Security Cornerstone.

The NRC’s security construction inspection program requires the inspectable areas below to be reviewed at each NRC-licensed power reactor under construction.  The inspectable areas verify aspects of key attributes of the construction security cornerstone in the safeguards strategic performance area.

2201-07	GUIDANCE

Security Construction Cornerstone Inspection — Annualized Grand Total — 913 DIE

2201-07	REFERENCES

IMC 2200, “Security Inspection Program for Construction”

IMC 2504, “Construction Inspection Program:  Inspection of Construction and Operational Programs”

IMC 2506, “Construction Reactor Oversight Process General Guidance and Basis Document”

END

Issue Date:  01/29/19	1	2200, Appendix A

ATTACHMENT 1 – Revision History for IMC 2200, Appendix A, “Security Construction Inspection Program”

Issue Date:  01/29/19	Att1-1	2200, Appendix A
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00834-CV

Life Care Centers of America, Inc., Appellant

v.

Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN403160, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 17, 2006
#### In the Matter of Angel Rodriguez, Appellant, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 347]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination of guilt for possession of contraband following a Tier II inmate disciplinary hearing. He contends that he was deprived of his due process right to notice that the materials he possessed, paperwork concerning the "Latin Kings” gang, would be deemed contraband. Petitioner failed to file an administrative appeal raising that issue. Therefore, he has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to that issue and this Court has no discretionary power to reach it *(see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin,*188 AD2d 1071, *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 834; *see also, Matter of Guyton v Coughlin*[proceeding No. 1], 214 AD2d 1043). Were that issue properly before us, we would conclude that it lacks merit *(see, Matter of Aballe v Coughlin,*216 AD2d 949). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 9:29 PM To: Hutson, Nick; Fruh, Steve; Culligan, Kevin; Harvey, Reid Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Revised RIA for 111(b) Attachments: SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) Ne w-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_ 7282105.docx



### Attached please find a summary of interagency comme nts in response to the latest revised version of th e RIA for the draft final 111(b) rule for EGUs.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any quest ions.

Nathan
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1994

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
No. 90-823.

#### Albert *v.*United States.

Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied.
Summary
of Lease Agreement between Micromet AG and KFV


Immobilienverwaltungs
GmbH, dated 11/4/2009





Effective as of February 1, 2010,
Micromet AG (“Micromet”) has leased an area of 850 square meters, or
approximately 9,150 square feet, for a fixed term of 5 years, in a building next
to its R&D headquarters from KFV Immobilienverwaltungs GmbH
(“KFV”).  Under the lease agreement, Micromet has the option to extend
the term for an additional fixed period of 5 years.





Currently, regular monthly payments are
equal to (i) EUR 9,817.50, or approximately $14,070.44, for rentable area
and parking places, and (ii) EUR 1,700.00, or approximately $2,436.44, for
ancillary expenses (similar to operating expenses reimbursed to commercial
lessors in the United States), plus Germany’s Value Added Tax (“VAT”), currently
at the rate of 19%.  The lease payments are subject to regular
increases based upon the German General Price Index (similar to the U.S.
Consumer Price Index) and the ancillary expenses are subject to increases based
on Micromet’s consumption.





Micromet will pay to KFV the sum of EUR
100,000.00 (including VAT), or approximately $143,320.00 for structural
improvements to the leased space requested by Micromet.  Micromet has
the option to terminate the lease with 6 months prior written notice on January
31, 2013.  In the event Micromet elects to terminate the lease,
Micromet will reimburse KFV for the structural improvements in the amount of EUR
50,000, or approximately $71,660.00 (including VAT).  Micromet will
also deliver a security deposit equal to 3 months’ net rent, which will be
refunded to Micromet upon the expiration of the lease agreement less any amounts
are withheld to cover renovation costs of KFV.





***Euro/Dollar
conversion rate is 1.4332 as quoted by Oanda as of December 31,
2009***
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1730 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the 

protection of community centers with religious affiliation, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1730 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Religiously 

3 Affiliated Institutions Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELI5 GIOUS AFFILIATION. 

6 Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after 

9 ‘‘threat of force,’’ the following: ‘‘including by threat 

10 of force against religious real property,’’; 

11 (2) in subsection (d)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

13 the end; 

14 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

15 paragraph (5); and 

16 (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

17 following: 

18 ‘‘(4) if damage to or destruction of property re19 sults from the acts committed in violation of this 

20 section, which damage to or destruction of such 

21 property is in an amount that exceeds $5,000, a fine 

22 in accordance with this title and imprisonment for 

23 not more than 3 years, or both; and’’; and 

24 (3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the pe25 riod at the end the following: ‘‘, or real property 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1730 RFS 

1 owned or leased by a nonprofit, religiously affiliated 

2 organization’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Order filed June 2 0 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00348

- CV

___________ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF DAVID A LLEN GARZA AND BRITTANY GARZA

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 320200300

O R D E R
No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 300th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On May 6 , 2019 , the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporte r’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
No. 91-5623.

#### Beringer *v.*Peters, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.