alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      33,245,797
<SECURITIES>                                25,305,837
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,947,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                   177,811
<INVENTORY>                                 26,130,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           109,204,905
<PP&E>                                      11,557,845
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,622,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,237,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,840,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,651,606
<OTHER-SE>                                 108,735,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,237,614
<SALES>                                     29,787,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,787,819
<CGS>                                       10,840,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,840,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,399,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,104,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,295,541
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 223 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1679 

[Report No. 115–159] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To ensure that the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s current efforts to modernize its grant management 

system includes applicant accessibility and transparency, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FEMA Accountability, 

5 Modernization and Transparency Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1679 RS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Federal 

3 Emergency Management Agency shall ensure the ongoing 

4 modernization of the grant systems for the administration 

5 of assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

6 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) 

7 includes the following: 

8 (1) An online interface, including online assist9 ance, for applicants to complete application forms, 

10 submit materials, and access the status of applica11 tions. 

12 (2) Mechanisms to eliminate duplication of ben13 efits. 

14 (3) If appropriate, enable the sharing of infor15 mation among agencies and with State, local, and 

16 tribal governments, to eliminate the need to file mul17 tiple applications and speed disaster recovery. 

18 (4) Any additional tools the Administrator de19 termines will improve the implementation of this sec20 tion. 

21 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—To the extent practicable, 

22 the Administrator shall deliver the system capabilities de23 scribed in subsection (a) in increments or iterations as 

24 working components for applicant use. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1679 RS

1 SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 No additional funds are authorized to carry out the 

3 requirements of this Act. Such requirements shall be car4 ried out using amounts otherwise authorized. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 223 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1679 

[Report No. 115–159] 

AN ACT 

To ensure that the Federal Emergency Manageposes. cessibility and transparency, and for other pur- grant management system includes applicant ac- ment Agency’s current efforts to modernize its 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH BORIS ZINNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 268 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
fs1a4ex4i_empire.htm


Exhibit 4.1







SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE







[________]NUMBER







SHARES[________]







AUTHORIZED  COMMON STOCK; 100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER  AGENT  INCORPORATED  UNDER  THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA Common stock CUSIP THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF SHARES OF EMPIRE GLOBAL GAMING, INC.’S COMMON STOCK TRANSFERABLE ON  THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY  UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.







THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR.







Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.







Dated:







[SEAL OF Empire Global Gaming, Inc.]







/s/ Nicholas M. Sorge


Nicholas M. Sorge, President







/s/ Dolores Marsh


Dolores Marsh, Secretary                                                                            

















By:  Patrick Day


       American Registrar and Transfer Company


       Salt Lake City, UT 84107












This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.







NOTICE:  Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust company.







The following abbreviation, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:







TEN COM - as tenants in common


UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ____Custodian____


TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties


 




  





  











  






 


(Cust) (Minor) JT TEN - as joint tenants with right under Uniform Gifts to Minors of survivorship and not as Act


________________________ tenants in common.


   (State)







Additional abbreviation may also be used though not in above list.







FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE -


-------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________________________


______  ___ _________ (Please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of assignee)


________________________________________________________ ______


_______________________________________________________________


______ ___  _________  Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________________________________________________  Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of


substitution in the premises.







Dated:







NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                         |  |                         
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|               |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.                
|               |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY               
|               | 
|               |  | By: KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |                                        
|August 9, 2006 |  | By:                                     |  | /s/ JOSEPH P. CAVANAUGH 
|               |  |                                         |  | Joseph P. Cavanaugh     
|               |  |                                         |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|               |  |                                         |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P. 
|               |  |                                         |  | Star Gas Finance Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,727,237
<SECURITIES>                                 8,250,907
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,734,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (390,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,151,087
<PP&E>                                       1,619,309
<DEPRECIATION>                               (654,242)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,301,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,640,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,916,620
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,301,507
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,280,003
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (10,525,546)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (590,298)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (3,246,726)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,917,433
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,485,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,432,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,432,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 696 -CR Jo hn R obe r t W e lc h , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 5868 1 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ap p e ll ant’ s mo ti o nto d is mi s s th is a p p e a l is g rante d. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.2(a) . The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 8, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Calvin Kantonen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First American Scientific Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Calvin Kantonen
Calvin Kantonen
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------



---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 12th day of February, 2007.



| | JOHN BRIAN NICHOLS     
| | -----------------------
| | John Brian Nichols     
| | Chief Executive Officer

















---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1686 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the limitation on 

the carryover of excess corporate charitable contributions by regulated 

public utilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the limitation on the carryover of excess corporate charitable contributions by regulated public utilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON CARRYOVER OF 

4 EXCESS CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS BY 

5 REGULATED PUBLIC UTILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(d)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1686 IH

1 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR REGULATED PUB2 LIC UTILITIES.—In the case of a corporation 

3 that is a regulated public utility (as defined in 

4 section 7701(a)(33)), or an affiliated group of 

5 which such a regulated public utility is a part, 

6 subparagraph (A) shall be applied by sub7 stituting ‘20 succeeding taxable years’ for ‘5 

8 succeeding taxable years’ and by substituting 

9 ‘each of the second through twentieth’ for ‘the 

10 second, third, fourth, or fifth’.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to excess contributions which are 

13 deductible under section 170(d)(2)(A) of such Code in suc14 ceeding taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 98-21141

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ENRIQUE SUAREZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

(H-97-CR-50-1) 

_________________________________________________________________

October 26, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Enrique Suarez contends that his 72-month sentence

(increased on remand from 60 months) for possession of cocaine with

intent to distribute is the product of judicial vindictiveness and

based on attorney-client communications; that his counsel was

ineffective by disclosing to the court that Suarez refused to

identify his coconspirators for fear of retaliation; and that the
- 2 -

Government committed prosecutorial misconduct during his

arraignment.

Because, at sentencing, Suarez did not object regarding

judicial vindictiveness, our review is limited to plain error. See

United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en

banc). Although Suarez’s sentence on remand was higher than his

original sentence, thus raising a presumption of vindictiveness,

“objective information in the record justif[ied] the increased

sentence”. United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 67 (5th Cir.

1997) (quoting Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 565 (1984)).

Nor was Suarez’s sentence based on counsel’s disclosure of

attorney-client communications. In sum, there was no plain error.

Generally, we decline, on direct appeal, to review ineffective

assistance of counsel claims, see, United States v. Gibson, 55 F.3d

173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995); the exception is “in rare cases where the

record allow[s]” a fair evaluation of the merits. United States v.

Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Here, no further facts

need to be developed for the claim to be suitable for review.

Because the district court did not arrive at the sentence by

relying on counsel’s disclosure of attorney-client communications,

Suarez has failed to show that he was prejudiced by the disclosure.

See Spriggs v. Collins, 993 F.2d 85, 88 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Finally, Suarez’s prosecutorial-misconduct claim, also

reviewed for plain error because he did not make a contemporaneous
- 3 -

objection, see United States v. Binker, 795 F.2d 1218, 1227 (5th

Cir. 1986), fails because it is not supported by the record. See

United States v. Rocha, 916 F.2d 219, 234 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED