alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 169 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf off the 

coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. 

TED LIEU of California, Ms. LEE, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Ms. 

MATSUI, Mr. KILMER, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. THOMPSON of California, 

Ms. SPEIER, Mr. PETERS, Mr. GARAMENDI, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Coast Ocean Pro5 tection Act of 2017’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 169 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE 

2 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF THE COAST 

3 OF CALIFORNIA, OREGON, AND WASHINGTON. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil or natural gas in any area of the outer Continental 

13 Shelf off the coast of the State of California, Oregon, or 

14 Washington.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
TV 1 TV 2

40" LED Backlit 15" CCFL

Pstandby-passive_no_connections (Watts) 0.10 0.62

Pstandby-passive_HDMI_only (Watts) 0.06 0.61

Pstandby-active_low_cable (Watts) 0.05 0.83

Pstandby-active_low_ethernet (Watts) 0.10 N/A

Pstandby-active_low_wireless (Watts) N/A N/A

N/A

-

The Television Internet Standby Data is comprised of data indicating the energy consumption when TVs are in sta

connected to various external sources including HDMI, cable, Ethernet, and wireless internet. DOE conducted pow

according to the ENERGY STAR standby test procedure while alternating the specific internet connections present 

Television Standby Mode

 = Calculated Data

 = Raw Data

 = Not Applicable

 = No Data Available
TV 3 TV 4 TV 5 TV 6

23" LED Edgelit 22" CCFL 19" LED Edgelit 55" LED Backlit

0.47 0.11 0.54 0.07

0.46 0.11 0.54 0.07

N/A 0.11 0.54 0.07

N/A N/A N/A 0.07

N/A N/A N/A N/A

consumption when TVs are in standby mode and 

less internet. DOE conducted power consumption testing 

cific internet connections present on the TV. 
TV 7 TV 8 TV 9 TV 10

47" LED Edgelit 46" CCFL 42" LED Backlit 22" CCFL

0.82 0.14 0.20 0.64

0.86 0.14 0.20 0.63

0.83 0.14 0.21 0.63

0.82 N/A N/A N/A

0.82 N/A N/A N/A
TV 11 TV 12 TV 13 TV 14

63" Plasma 42" Plasma 23" LED Backlit 60" LED Edgelit

0.11 0.39 0.16 0.16

0.11 0.38 0.16 0.16

0.11 0.38 N/A 0.16

0.11 N/A N/A 0.16

N/A N/A N/A N/A
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual Report of CABLE NET, INC. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kevin  Ericksteen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: March 15, 2004                                  Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Final Results of the Hydrogen Igniter Experimental Program (NUREG/CR-2486)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2486 (PDF - 2.97 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: November 1981 **Date Published**: February 1982

**Prepared by**: W. E. Lowry (Principal Investigator), B. R. Bowman, LLNL, B. W. Davis, Northern Arizona University

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550

**Prepared for**: Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 NRC FIN No. A0418

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Thermal igniters proposed by the Tennessee Valley Authority for intentional ignition of hydrogen in nuclear reactor containments have been tested in mixtures of air, hydrogen, and steam. The igniters, conventional diesel engine glow plugs, were tested in a 10.6 ft 3 pressure vessel with dry hydrogen concentrations from 4% to 29% hydrogen, and in steam fractions of up to 50%. Dry tests indicated complete combustion between 8% and 9% H2, and no combustion for concentrations below 5%. Steam tests were done with hydrogen volume fractions of 8%, 10%, and 12%. Steam concentrations of up to 30% consistently resulted in ignition. Most of the 40% steam fraction tests resulted in combustion. In a few isolated cases the 50% steam fraction tests indicated a pressure rise. Circulation of the mixture improved combustion in both the dry and the steam tests, most notably at low H2 concentrations. An analysis of the high steam fraction test data showed a high probability for the presence of small, suspended, water droplets in the test mixture. The suppressive influence of this condensation-generated fog on combustion is evaluated.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit
31.1**  **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Karl
F. Arleth certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Teton Petroleum
Company;
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 
 /s/
Karl F. Arleth
 Karl F.
Arleth
 Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, the undersigned officer of Tollgrade
Communications, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies that the
Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Dated:  May 13, 2003

/s/ Samuel C. Knoch
-------------------
Name:  Samuel C. Knoch
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PETRACOM HOLDINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                       601
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,294
<PP&E>                                          18,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,543
<BONDS>                                         98,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,269
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (32,895)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,509
<SALES>                                         21,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    31
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Development and Verification of Fire Tests for Cable Systems and System Components: Quarterly Reports 2 and 3, September 1, 1977 – February 28, 1978 (NUREG/CR-0152, UL-USNC-75Q2-3)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-0152 (PDF - 1.17 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1978 **Date Published:**June 1978

**Prepared by:** L. Przybyla, W.J. Christian Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, IL 60062

**Prepared for:** Division of Reactor Safety Research  Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Under Contract No. NRC-04-77-122

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Experiments were performed to define the effects of a cnumber of test parameters on the results of vertical flame tests of tray-mounted cables in a configuration similar to that specified by IEEE Standard 383. Parameters considered were fuel input rate, fuel-air ratio, burner location, and test cell configuration. In order to reduce time and material costs for the experiments, the parameters were first investigated with an inert instrumented board to simulate a full cable tray. Measurements of temperatures and heat flux along the board were used to define the-range of parameters to be used in experiments with actual cables. Full cable trays, 8 ft long, were used in these experiments; and observations were made of the flame travel distances and air temperatures on both faces of the tray, as well as temperature distribution along the jacket of one cable in each tray. Two burners of the type specified in IEEE 383, one at each tray face, provided the ignition source. Experiments with one cable type produced results which were extremely variable because of random movements of the cable bundle during burning. Since measures to remove this variability by permanently fixing cable positions would remove realism from the test, experimentation with full cable trays was discontinued. Measurements of jacket temperature distribution obtained in these experiments indicated that it may be possible to determine the upward progression of cable damage in that way. Future experiments to study the effects of test parameters on the IEEE 383 standard test are outlined.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92193-92194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27200]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 717 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 92194]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-397, K2025-395.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27200 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7**  **685**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. ERIC MARTIN VAN BUREN , Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville
. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 3 : 0 0

- cr - 000 66

- NKM

- 1 ; 3 :12

- cv - 806 20

- NKM )

Submitted : February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges
.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Eric Martin Van Buren , Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson , Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottes ville, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Martin Van Buren seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge iss ues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies re lief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Van Buren has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Van Buren’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal
.3 Additionally, we construe Van Buren ’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successi ve § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence that
. . . would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court , that was previously unavailable
. 28 U.S.C. § 22 55(h ) (2012)
. Van Buren ’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authori zation to fi le a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          54,520
<SECURITIES>                                   111,951
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,236
<PP&E>                                          12,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 269,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,402
<SALES>                                          4,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,882
<CGS>                                            3,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (741)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION 
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF 
  TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
  Code), each of the undersigned officers of Medicure Inc. (the "Company"),
  does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form
  20-F for the year ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") that, to the best
  of their knowledge:

(1)
  the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
  the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 19, 2005 | /s/ Albert D. Friesen                     
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                       | Albert D. Friesen, Chief Executive Officer
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)             
|                       |                                           
|                       |                                           
|Dated: August 19, 2005 | /s/ Derek Reimer                          
|                       | Derek Reimer, Chief Financial Officer     
|                       | (Principal Financial Officer)             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) (17 CFR 240.13a -14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit to the Report.

---