alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS America Departs Singapore after Holiday Visit 

By Mass Communication Seaman Daniel PastorUSS America Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the International Conference on Wire System Aging (NUREG/CP-0179)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG CP-0179, Cover - Page 200 (PDF - 9.09 MB) 
        - NUREG CP-0179, Page 201 - End (PDF - 10.4 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Held at:** DoubleTree Hotel Rockville, Maryland April 23-25, 2002

**Manuscript Completed:** June 2002**Date Published:** November 2002

**Compiled by:** R. J. Lofaro, Meeting Coordinator

J. Vora, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Proceedings prepared by:** Brookhaven National Laboratory

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document provides the proceedings of the International Conference on Wire System Aging held April 23-25, 2002 in Rockville, Maryland, USA. The conference had a three-fold purpose: 1) to review current practices and programs for understanding and managing wire system aging, 2) to exchange information on the current status of research related to the technical issues in this area, and 3) to identify additional technical issues and programs of interest related to wire system aging and safety for collaborative research. This conference was sponsored by the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Included herein are copies of the papers presented at the conference, as well as highlights from the audience discussion. In some cases, where a full paper was not written, copies of the presentations are included.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1922

DWAYNE MORRISON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.
R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:07-cv-00003-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: February 2, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Morrison appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his retaliation
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). * We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Morrison

v. Nicholson , No. 4:07-cv-00003-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 11,
2008; entered July 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although Morrison’s complaint also asserted that he was unlawfully terminated because of his race, Morrison withdrew this discrimination claim during the course of proceedings before the district court.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Material Transport Analysis for Accident-Induced Flow in Nuclear Facilities (NUREG/CR-3527,LA-9913-MS)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3527 (PDF - 3.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 1983**Date Published:**October 1983

**Prepared by:** R.A. Martin, P.K. Tang, A.P. Harper, J.D. Novat, W.S. Gregory Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 

**Prepared for:**Division of Risk Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN A-7029

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report is a summary of the material transport modeling procedures developed to support a family of accident analysis computer codes. The material transport modeling areas include transport initiation, convection, interaction, depletion, and filtration. Except for material interaction, these areas are developed in modular form in three Los Alamos National Laboratory computer codes: TORAC, EXPAC, and FIRAC. This family of codes was developed to provide improved methods of tornado, explosion, and fire accident consequence assessment, respectively, for the 'nuclear industry. Although the codes were designed to estimate accident-induced gas-dynamic, thermal, and material transport transient phenomena in nuclear fuel cycle facility ventilation systems, they are applicable to other facilities as well. Sample problems using TORAC have been provided to illustrate the current material transport capabilities for a simple system under tornado-induced accident conditions. Some suggestions for future improvements to some of these material transport models also are discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00028-CV

TERESA WARD COOPER, Appellant

V.

BLUE WATER SHORES PROPERTY 

OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law

of Hood County (C08913)

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Mike Wallach__________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      24,579,578              24,579,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,568,442               8,568,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,484,844               2,484,844
<INVENTORY>                                    138,895                 138,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,396,746              32,396,746
<PP&E>                                       4,499,677               4,499,677
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,364,525               1,364,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,659,722              35,659,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,584,295               1,584,295
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,501                  26,501
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,017,877              33,017,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,659,722              35,659,722
<SALES>                                      5,370,034              15,191,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,370,034              15,191,956
<CGS>                                        1,954,383               5,909,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,594,985              13,609,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,640,602               7,700,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               500,867               1,633,492
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,082                 231,829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,052,022               2,223,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                   449,671                 953,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            775,048               1,582,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   602,351               1,269,938  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11                    0.24
        


</TABLE>
No. 86-565.

#### Manson, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Corrections *v.*Alston et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             768 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,459 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,349 
<INVENTORY>                                      3,272 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,760 
<PP&E>                                          16,369 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,692 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,631 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,368 
<BONDS>                                         10,565 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                      4,025 
<COMMON>                                           149 
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,275 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,631 
<SALES>                                         17,438 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,318 
<CGS>                                            4,363 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,343 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,270 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,358 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (805)
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.61)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.61)   
                                               

<FN>
   Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported at -0- herein.

* Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for 
  doubtful account in the Statement of Financial Position. 
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Charles E. Hadley *vs.*Elden T. Garey.

Oxford County.

Decided February 6, 1922.

*Frederick R. Dyer,*for plaintiff.

*Alton C. Wheeler,*for defendant.

An action for damages caused by defendant’s automobile colliding with a heifer belonging to the plaintiff. It is alleged that the defendant was negligent in the operation of his automobile. The jury heard the evidence and found for the defendant. The case is before this court on a motion for a new trial on the usual grounds,, The issue was solely one of fact. An examination of the evidence does not satisfy us that the verdict of the jury is so manifestly wrong as to warrant interference by this court. Entry will be. Motion overruled.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 763 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-455, K2025-452.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27921 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7141

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH WAYNE CLONTZ, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-82-V-A, CA-96-70-1-V) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Wayne Clontz, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant’s actions were sufficient to support his guilty plea to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994). See Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before thecourt and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant’s motion to expedite is hereby denied as moot.

DISMISSED
MESSAGE TO INTERNET USERS: JANUARY 29, 1998 RE: 95-5224 FREUNDT-ALBERTI v. MERRILL, LYNCH

---------------------------------------------------------------------- The one page attachment referred to in the above opinion, does not appear in this text. It will, however, appear when loaded in approximately 10 days. Nancy Gilman, Opinions Clerk US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (404) 335-6151
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Grange, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date:November 3, 2009
#### Helen Smith et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Auburn Memorial Hospital, Respondent-Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1021]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The negligence of defendant and the cause of the injuries to Helen Smith (plaintiff) may be reasonably inferred from the circumstantial evidence adduced at trial *(see, Schneider v Kings Highway Hosp. Ctr.,*67 NY2d 743, 744; *Coluzzi v Korn,*209 AD2d 951, 951-952, *lv denied*85 NY2d 801; *Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*158 AD2d 194, 199-200, *lv dismissed*76 NY2d 934; *cf., Nyon Sook Lee v Shields,*188 AD2d 637). Supreme Court did not err in granting defendant a new trial on damages unless plaintiff agreed to a total verdict of $120,000. The jury’s award of $350,000 for future pain and suffering was excessive and differed materially from what would be reasonable compensation *(see,*CPLR 5501 [c]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — Set Aside Verdict.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Shih-Jye Cheng, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 4, 2009



/s/ Shih-Jye ChengName:

Shih-Jye ChengTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer