alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Illinois Surety Company, Appellant, vs. Maguire, Respondent.

*September 18*

October *8, 1912.*

*Contracts: Construction: Indemnity against liability.*

A -written contract to protect and indemnify another against loss, damage, or expense which he may sustain “or become liable for” in consequence of a certain act, is an agreement to protect against liability as well as damage, where the words quoted are not controlled by any other provisions of the contract.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Wauke-sha county: Mastín L. Lueck, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

*545The cause was submitted for'tbe appellant on tbe brief of *Holt &*Goombs, and for the respondent on that of Merton, *Newbury & Jacobson.*-- '

Winslow, O. J.

In this case, one question is presented by demurrer to the complaint, and that is the question whether a written agreement to protect and indemnify another against loss, damage, or expense which he may sustain “or become liable for” in consequence of a certain-act, is an agreement to indemnify against actual damage alone, or to indemnify against liability as well. We can entertain no doubt that it must be construed as an agreement-to protest against liability as well as damage. *Hoven v. Employers’ L. A. Corp.*93 Wis. 201, *67*N. W. 46. To hold otherwise would be to eliminate the words “or become liable for” from the contract. This cannot'be done: the words are apt and unmistakable. They are not controlled by any other provisions of the contract, and must receive their natural meaning. It follows that the judgment appealed from was erroneous.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and action remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer, to-the complaint, and for further proceedings according to law.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gladys B. Gomez, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 196]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 17, 1995, which ruled that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely.

The evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusion that he lacked the authority to hear claimant’s case because she failed to timely request a hearing. Claimant admitted that she received copies of the decisions of the local unemployment insurance office finding that she was ineligible to receive benefits and that she understood that she had 30 days to request a hearing. Her request for a hearing was, however, made after the expiration of that time period. Although claimant contended that the late filing was due to her being ill, she admitted that she was not in bed or in the hospital. The record also reveals that claimant continued to perform most of her daily activities. Claimant’s remaining arguments have been considered and rejected for lack of merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### Horicon State Bank, Respondent, vs. Seering and others, Appellants.

For the appellants : *John W. Culbertson*and *Lawrence F. O’Brien,*both of Madison.

For the respondent: *Sawyer & Gehl*of Hartford.

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
#### Braun, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*November 14*—

December *8, 1931.*

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by *Nohl, Nohl, Petrie & Blume*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Henry M. Blume.*

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *John P. Donnelly,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *A. J. Beyer,*deputy district attorney.

Wickhem, J.

This case was argued and submitted with *Miswald v. State,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 309, 239 N. W. 418), and is ruled in all respects by the opinion in that case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to discharge the plaintiff in error.

Fairchild, J., took no part.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis with TRACE Code of PKL III Tests G1.1 & G1.1a. Study on Heat Transfer Mechanisms in the SG in Presence of Nitrogen, Steam and Water as a Function of the Primary Coolant Inventory in Single Loop Operation (NUREG/IA-0530)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0530 (PDF - 6.35 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 2022**Date Published:**April 2022

**Prepared by:**C. Berna, A. Escrivá & J.L. Muñoz-Cobo

Instituto de Ingeniería EnergéticaUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaCamino de Vera 14, 46022, València, Spain

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Prepared as part ofThe Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The goal of this report is to explain the main results obtained in the simulations performed with the consolidated thermal-hydraulic code TRACE regarding tests PKL III G1.1 and G1.1a. The G1 test series focused on the occurrence of boron dilution processes following the loss of Residual Heat Removal System (RHRS) during ¾-loop operation (primary circuit still closed). Main objective was to provide a data basis for thermal-hydraulics codes for a better understanding of the heat transfer mechanisms in the Steam Generator in presence of Nitrogen, steam and water in the U-tubes and of the coolant transport phenomena observed inside the U-tubes. The main goal of this report is to analyse the capacity of TRACE V5.0p2 code to precisely simulate thermal stratification and natural circulation of both single and biphasic fluxes inside the whole primary circuit.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 14, 2022
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Dry Cask Storage Characterization Project - Phase 1: CASTOR V/21 Cask Opening and Examination (NUREG/CR-6745)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6745 (PDF 20.50 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** August 2001**Date Published:** September 2001

**Prepared by:** W.C. Bare, L.D. Torgerson

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3114

R.M. Kenneally, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6038

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report documents visual examination and testing conducted in 1999 and early 2000 at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) on a Gesellschaft fUr Nuklear Service (GNS) CASTOR V/21 pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent fuel dry storage cask. The purpose of the examination and testing is to develop a technical basis for renewal of licenses and Certificates of Compliance for dry storage systems for spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste at independent spent fuel storage installation sites. The examination and testing was conducted to assess the condition of the cask internal and external surfaces, cask contents consisting of 21 Westinghouse PWR spent fuel assemblies from Dominion's (formerly named Virginia Power) Surry Power Station and cask concrete storage pad. The assemblies have been continuously stored in the CASTOR cask since 1985. Cask exterior surface and selected fuel assembly temperatures, and cask surface gamma and neutron dose rates were measured. Cask externallinternal surfaces, fuel basket components including accessible weldments, fuel assembly exteriors, and primary lid seals were visually examined. Selected fuel rods were removed from one fuel assembly, visually examined, and then shipped to Argonne National Laboratory for nondestructive, destructive, and mechanical examination. Cask interior crud samples and helium cover gas samples were collected and analyzed. The results of the examination and testing indicate the concrete storage pad, CASTOR V/21 cask, and cask contents exhibited sound structural and seal integrity and that long-term storage has not caused detectable degradation of the spent fuel cladding or the release of gaseous fission products between 1985 and 1999.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### Carl Singh et al., Respondents, v Jacob Ofir et al., Appellants.

[771 NYS2d 914]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated December 31, 2002, which granted the motion of the plaintiff Carl Singh for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Carl Singh established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim and the defendants failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1211 [a]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1788 

To extend the Vietnam Service Medal to veterans of the Armed Forces 

who participated in the S.S. Mayaguez rescue operation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2017 

Mr. MEADOWS (for himself and Ms. GABBARD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To extend the Vietnam Service Medal to veterans of the 

Armed Forces who participated in the S.S. Mayaguez 

rescue operation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recognizing Mayaguez 

5 Veterans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AWARD OF VIETNAM SERVICE MEDAL TO VETERANS 

7 WHO PARTICIPATED IN MAYAGUEZ RESCUE 

8 OPERATION. 

9 (a) AWARD AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the 

10 military department concerned shall, upon the application 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1788 IH

1 by or on behalf of an individual who is an eligible veteran, 

2 award that individual the Vietnam Service Medal, notwith3 standing any otherwise applicable requirements for the 

4 award of that medal. Any such award shall be made in 

5 lieu of any Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal awarded 

6 the individual for the individual’s participation in the Ma7 yaguez rescue operation. 

8 (b) TREATMENT OF DECEASED VETERANS.—In the 

9 case of a veteran who is deceased, the application de10 scribed in subsection (a) may be submitted by the next 

11 of kin of the veteran. 

12 (c) ELIGIBLE VETERAN.—For purposes of this sec13 tion, the term ‘‘eligible veteran’’ means a veteran of the 

14 Armed Forces— 

15 (1) who was awarded the Armed Forces Expe16 ditionary Medal for participation in military oper17 ations known as the Mayaguez rescue operation of 

18 May 12–15, 1975; or 

19 (2) who participated in such operation. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of LOFT Test L5–1 Using RELAP5/MOD2 (NUREG/IA-0118, TD/SPB/REP/0130)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Summary

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0118 (PDF 1.60 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** May 1993

**Prepared by:** S. Cooper

Nuclear Electric Barnett Way Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 7RS

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Summary

RELAP5/MOD2 is being used by Technology Division for the calculation of certain small break loss-of coolant accidents (SBLOCA) and pressurised transients in the Sizewell 'B' PWR.

To assist in validating RELAP5/MOD2 for the above application, the code is being used to model a number of small LOCA ind pressurised fault simulation experiments carried out in integral test facilities. The present report describes a RELAP5/MOD2 analysis of an intermediate break LOCA test in the LOFT facility. This test was designed to simulate the rupture of a single 14 inch diameter accumulator injection line in a commercial PWR with a 25% break in the broken loop cold leg. Early in the transient the pumps were tripped and the HPIS injection initiated; towards the end of the transient, accumulator and LPIS injection began.

RELAP5/MOD2 gave reasonably accurate predictions of the system thermal hydraulic behaviour but failed to accurately calculate the core dryout which occurred due to boil-off prior to accumulator injection. The error is due to the failure to calculate the correct core void distribution during this period of the transient. A separate calculction using the RELPIN code using hydraulic data from the RELAP5 analysis gave significantly improved predictions of the core dryout. However, the peak clad temperature was underpredicted, it is believed that the error is due to the fact that the core liquid inventory in this boildown was overpredicted in the RELAP5/MOD2 calculation.

A sensitivity calculation showed that when the core void distribution and core inventory were well predicted, both RELAP and RELPIN accurately predict fuel clad temperatures.

The work in this report was carried out on behalf of PPG and HSD under Agreement TSPBSW2001, PPG Task G212(22G).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 91-6217.

#### Shupe *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No: III-19-020 October 2, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Clinton Nuclear Power Station

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Jim 

Beavers as the new senior resident inspector at the Clinton Nuclear 

Power Station. The plant is located in Clinton, Ill., 23 miles south of 

Bloomington. 

Beavers joined the NRC in 2009 as an emergency preparedness 

inspector in Region II. He served as a resident inspector and as an acting 

senior resident inspector at the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant. He 

has also been an acting resident inspector at the Davis-Besse, LaSalle and 

Perry nuclear power plants. 

Beavers served six years in the United States Navy aboard the 

USS Tecumseh in various roles, including as submarine propulsion plant 

supervisor. Afterwards, Beavers worked as an NRC-licensed reactor 

operator at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant and as a senior reactor operator instructor at the Perry 

nuclear power plant. He has also worked with the International Atomic Energy Agency as an 

emergency preparedness and response officer.

He holds a bachelor’s degree in applied science and technology from Thomas Edison State 

College (now known as Thomas Edison State University).

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations. Beavers joins NRC resident inspector Dan Sargis at the 

Clinton facility. They will serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections 

and monitoring significant work projects.
#### Dakota Brewing Company, Plaintiff, vs. Lakeside Bridge & Steel Company, Respondent: Brant & Nielsen, Inc., Interpleaded Defendant and Appellant.

For the appellant: *Seher & Seher*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Olwell & Brady*of Milwaukee,

*By the Court.*

— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent
A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Vincent A. Wasik
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Vincent A. Wasik
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        February 14, 2005
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Eagle Soars for 50th Year

By Senior Airman Yosselin Perla18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

ALY TAM B OUR

A, Pe titione r - Appe lla nt,
v. R OB ER T L. AYER S, Jr., W arde n, Re sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 11-17243 D.C . No. 5:08-c v-01143-JF M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Je re m y D. Foge l, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d an d Subm i tte d De c e m be r 3, 2013 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : GOULD a

nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s, a nd HUFF, Distric t Judge
. **



# FIL ED D EC 23 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble M arily

n L. Huff, Unite d

Stat e s Distric t Judge for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia , sitting by de signa tion.Pe titione r Aly Tam boura (“ Pe titione r” ) a

ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of his pe tition for writ of ha

be a s c orpus. Ta

m b oura c onte nds tha

t the sta te tria l c ourt viola te d his due proc e ss right to a n im pa rtia l de c isionm ake r a t his proba t ion
re voc ation he aring. W e have jurisdic tion to re vie w the fina l orde r of the distric t c ourt pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . §§ 1291 a

nd 2253. W e re vie w the unde rly ing sta te c ourt ruling pursua

nt to the Anti-Te rrorism

and Effe c tive De ath Pe na l ty Ac t of 1996 (“ AEDPA” ), 28 U.S.C . § 2254. The tria l c ourt judgec onduc te d a n in-de pth proba

tion re voc ation he aring to
e xplore whe the r Pe t itione r viola te d the c onditions of his proba t ion a nd whe the r those viola

tions we re willful. Afte r de te rm ining tha t Pe titione r’ s c onduc t c onstitute d a

willful viola

tion by a pre ponde ran c e of the e vide nc e , se e Pe ople v. R odrigue z , 795 P.2d 783, 789 (C a l. 1990), thetria l c o urt judge im pose d the suspe n de d se nte nc e . Pe titione r ha s not de m onstra te d tha t the tria l c ourt judgepre de te rm ine d the
re sult of theprobation re voc a tion he a ring. The tria l c o urt judge ’ s sta te m e nts during theproc e e dings did not displa y the ty pe of de e p-se ate d a

n ta gonism

tha t would m ake fa ir judgm e n t im possible . Se e Lite ky

v. Unite d State s, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (“ [J] u dic i a l re m arks during thec ourse of a tria l tha t a re c ritic a l or 2disa

pproving of, or e ve n hostileto, c ounse l, the pa rtie s , or the ir c a s e s, ordina rily do not support a

bia s or pa

rtia lity c ha l le nge .” ). On the ba sis of there c ord, a nd ta k ing into a c c ount thehigh de gre e of de fe re nc e tha

t the c o urt m

ust a fford to thefindings of the sta t e a p pe lla te c ourt, se e Hibble r v. B e ne de tti, 693 F.3d 1140, 1146 (9th C ir. 2012), c e rt de nie d, 133 S. C t. 1262 (U.S. 2013), wea ffirm the distric t

c o urt’ s de nia l of the pe tition.

AFFIRM E D.

3
## NUMBER 13
- 2 1
- 00 113
- C V
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

YISEL RODRIGUEZ , Appellant,

v.
RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ & WIFE NINFA RODRIGUEZ , Appellee s
.

On a ppeal from the 206th District Court o f Hidalgo County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

This is an interlocutory appeal of a temporary injunction in a trespass to try title

case. The order on appeal, dated April 13, 2021 , provides in relevant part that a ppellant Yisel Rodriguez and her family must vacate the subject property within forty

- five days

.2 Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal , stating that the parties have reached an agreement allowing appellant to stay on the property until July 1, 20 21. The motion states that appellees Rafael Rodriguez and Ninfa Rodriguez are unopposed to the
motion. This Court, h aving considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that
the motion to dismiss should be granted. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42. 1(a)(1). Costs will be taxed against appellant

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”)

. Because the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will i ssue forthwith.
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
D elivered and filed on the 3rd day of June , 202 1

.