alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-88,720-01 & WR-88,720-02

EX P ARTE JASON EARL WHI TE, App licant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W10077-1 & W8888-1 IN THE 335 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HOOD COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for wr i t s o f h ab ea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). I n Cause No. CR10077, Applicant was convicted of three counts of ag g ravat ed sexual assault, one count of indece ncy with a child by contac t, and three counts of indec ency with a child by exposure and sentenced to six ty -five year s’ imprisonment, twenty y ear s’ imprisonment, and eig ht y ear s’ imprisonment, respe ctively
. I n Cause No. 8888, Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual as s au l t of a child and sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant’s convictions wer e aff irmed by the Second Court of Appea ls. W hite

v. State , Nos. 02-07-00089- CR & 02-07-00090- CR (Tex
. Ap p . — For t Worth May 29, 2008) (not2

desig nated f

or publication). The Court re m an d ed these writ applications for response s and finding s addre ssing one of Applicant’s ineffe ctive assistance of counsel claims and for a finding conce rning the status of a pending motion for judgme nt nunc pro tunc . After an independe nt r eview of the entire rec ord and the trial court’ s finding s, we find that Applicant' s ineffe ctive assistanc e of c ounsel claim is without merit. There fore , we de ny relief
. Applicant’s claim for pre- sentenc e jail time cre dit is dismiss ed. Ex parte Florence , 319 S.W .3d 695 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex parte Ybar ra , 149 S.W .3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
Filed: January

30, 2019 Do not publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27905]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 750 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-439, K2025-436.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27905 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena to Meet in Rockville, Maryland, on November 13-14

----

----

**ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON THERMAL-HYDRAULIC PHENOMENA TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON NOVEMBER 13-14**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena on November 13-14 in Rockville, Maryland.

Most of the meeting on November 13, which will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency's Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, will be closed to the public to discuss proprietary information pertinent to General Electric (GE) Nuclear Energy. The meeting will be open to the public on November 14. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. 

During the meeting, the subcommittee will begin review of GE Nuclear Energy's "TRACG" thermal-hydraulic code. It also will continue its review of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research's thermal hydraulic research program as it relates to the ACRS' annual report to the Commission on the agency's safety research. In addition, the subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of GE Nuclear Energy, the agency staff and other interested parties. 

For additional information contact Paul Boehnert, at 301-415-8065. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annual Report of A M Marketing, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April
              23, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Kevin
              EricksteenKevin
              EricksteenTitle:
              Chief
              Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

CONTACT:Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

I-96-76

November 22, 1996 

Contact: Diane Screnci

Neil A. Sheehan 

LOCAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT ROOM FOR THREE MILE ISLAND AND PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR PLANTS IS REOPENED

The entire section of the Harrisburg branch of the Pennsylvania State library housing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 

local public document room for the Three Mile Island and Peach Bottom nuclear power plants has now been reopened to the 

public. A project to remove lead from the building led to the temporary closure. The work began last fall.

Requests for records also may be addressed to the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), 2120 L Street NW, Lower Level, 

Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, or by calling the PDR at (800) 397-4209.

#
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of Andrew D. Ory and Keith Seidman hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, respectively of Acme Packet, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ANDREW D. ORYAndrew D. Ory President and Chief
Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/KEITH SEIDMANKeith Seidman Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report, and "accompanies" such Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report to which it relates), notwithstanding any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Manufactured Housing energy efficiency standards – Draft proposal:

Using 2 product types 

to balance affordability and efficiency objectives

Term sheet will include four parts:

1. Technical requirements for Product Type FO (Full Options)

a. Efficiency level: Maximize cost-effectiveness to all owners over a home’s life

b. Cost effectiveness assumptions: Based on “weighted average case” in term sheet 

framework document

c. Physical characteristics: All manufactured homes that are not Type LO 

d. Compliance path: Includes prescriptive, UA and Uo options, as in IECC

2. Technical requirements for Product Type LO (Limited Options) with lower first 

cost and lower efficiency

a. Efficiency Level: Maximize cost-effectiveness to first owner

b. Cost-effectiveness assumptions: Based on “worst case” as defined in term sheet 

framework document

c. Physical characteristics: Window / wall area ratio < 11% (?)

d. Compliance path: Includes prescriptive, UA and Uo options (?)

e. Production limit: Up to 30%(?) of a manufacturer’s annual production

Notes: The physical characteristics should be chosen to reasonably represent the 

lowest-cost homes that provide affordable housing for buyers with the least 

financial resources. Production limit should be as unconstraining as possible, 

subject to ensuring a sufficient volume of Type FO homes to achieve economies of 

scale. Nothing in this approach would preclude a manufacturer from seeking 

further exception through the regular DOE OHA process.

3. Updated ENERGY STAR criteria 

a. To include those measures in the Technical Requirements that exceed current 

ENERGY STAR criteria

Note: Updated criteria will be of particular use for utility and other energy 

efficiency programs. While this is not clearly part of WG charter, our work brings 

directly relevant information that should be explicitly incorporated. 

4. Energy label with clear consumer energy cost information

Note: Permanently affixed energy labeling with energy and energy cost information 

will facilitate informed consumer choice by both initial and resale buyers. Ideally this 

label will be included as part of HUD labeling. While not explicitly part of WG charter, 

the two-type approach makes labeling particularly important.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   May 12, 2008 |   | /s/ Levy  Gerzberg                     |
|---------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                            |   | Levy Gerzberg                          |
|                            |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1709 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a definition of the 

term ‘‘State’’ and to include territories therein, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a 

definition of the term ‘‘State’’ and to include territories 

therein, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THE TERM ‘‘STATE’’ TO INCLUDE TERRITORIES 

4 FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL LAW. 

5 (a) THE TERM ‘‘STATE’’ TO INCLUDE TERRI6 TORIES.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 9. Rule of construction regarding the term ‘State’ 

9 ‘‘In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, 

10 or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the varVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:48 Mar 29, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1709.IH H1709

lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1709 IH

1 ious administrative bureaus and agencies of the United 

2 States, the term ‘State’ shall include any territory of the 

3 United States, unless the statute, rule, regulation, or in4 terpretation explicitly excludes the territories from the def5 inition of the term or otherwise precludes their inclusion.’’. 

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

7 for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

‘‘9. Rule of construction regarding the term ‘State’.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

----

|  Date:  September 27, 2013                     |   /s/ Albert Friesen————————————————————— |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |  Albert D. Friesen Ph D., Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                    |  (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                               |
|                                                                    |                                                                                                                                                                              |
|  Date:  September 27, 2013      |   /s/ James Kinley—————————————————————   |
|                                                                    |  James F. Kinley CA, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                    |  (Principal Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                               |

----

----
Exhibit 10(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 143 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305
on Form N-1A of our reports dated November 24, 2010, relating to the financial
statements and financials highlights of BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity
Portfolio, BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Equity Portfolio, BlackRock Small Cap Core
Equity Portfolio, BlackRock Small Cap Growth Equity Portfolio and BlackRock Small/Mid-Cap
Growth Portfolio, each a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual
Reports on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds for the year ended September 30, 2010,
and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the
Prospectuses and “Financial Statements” in the Statement of Additional
Information,  which are part of such Registration Statement. 

 

/s/Deloitte
& Touche LLP 

    Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania  

    January
26, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3988-3989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Research 
Triangle Institute

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Research Triangle Institute applied to be registered as a 
manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA 
grants Research Triangle Institute registration as a manufacturer of 
those controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated July 2, 2014, and published 
in the Federal Register on July 14, 2014, 79 FR 40781, Research 
Triangle Institute, Kenneth S. Rehder, Ph.D., Hermann Building East 
Institute Drive, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 
27709, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic 
classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were 
submitted to this notice.
    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Research Triangle Institute to manufacture the basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with 
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's 
maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and 
testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the 
company's background and history.

[[Page 3989]]

    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company will manufacture marihuana and cocaine derivatives for 
use by their customers in analytical kits, reagents, and reference 
standards as directed by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-01301 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
No: 19-045 September 12, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Proposes $232,000 Civil Penalty for Florida Power & Light,

Bans Former Executive for Discrimination at St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $232,000 fine against Florida Power & 

Light and has barred a former FP&L executive from NRC-licensed activities for five years, for 

retaliating against a contract employee who raised a safety concern while working at the St. Lucie 

Nuclear Power Plant near Fort Pierce, Fla.

The NRC concluded FP&L and its contractor, Framatome, cancelled the employee’s work 

assignment after the individual filed a concern in St. Lucie’s corrective action program during a 

refueling outage in 2017. The NRC concluded Framatome played a minor role in the retaliation; given 

the company’s corrective actions, the NRC has issued Framatome a Notice of Violation. 

The NRC concluded the former executive deliberately submitted incomplete and inaccurate 

information while the agency investigated the cancelled work assignment. The executive voluntarily 

left FP&L during the investigation. In addition to the five-year ban, the former executive must also 

notify the NRC of the first NRC-licensed company he works for after the ban expires.

The NRC held separate pre-decisional enforcement conferences with FP&L and Framatome in 

early February 2019, and with the former executive in February and July 2019, to discuss the 

violations. FP&L and Framatome have the option to deny the violations and to seek mediation under 

the NRC’s alternative dispute resolution program. The companies and the executive must provide 

written responses to NRC’s notices of violation.
#### In the Matter of Neighbors Together Homeowners & Tenants Association et al., Appellants, v David Neufeld, as Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 428]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck dated April 1, 1993, which, after a hearing, granted the application of My Sisters’ Place, Inc., to convert an existing nonconforming use to a shelter for battered women and children, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered March 4, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The subject property is a two-family dwelling existing as a prior, nonconforming use. My Sisters’ Place, Inc., sought to convert the premises from a nonconforming two-family dwelling to a shelter for battered women and their children. Its application was denied by the Building Inspector of the Village of Mamaroneck and an appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mamaroneck (hereinafter the Zoning Board) followed.

Pursuant to the Village of Mamaroneck’s Zoning Code, the Zoning Board could grant the application if the evidence showed that the change of use was a less nonconforming one. After an extensive public hearing and in consideration of the many documents both in support of and in opposition to the proposed use, the Zoning Board passed a resolution finding that the proposed use would in fact be a less nonconforming one and one that would be more harmonious with the surrounding area. The Board took notice that the nature of the proposed use is extremely regulated and restricted to an extent far beyond that of any normal use as a two-family house or *655under a conforming use for the location. We find that the Board’s determination was supported by substantial evidence on the record and that it was not arbitrary, capricious, illegal, or an abuse of discretion *(see,*CPLR 7803 [3]; *Matter of Budget Estates v Roth,*203 AD2d 287).

We also find that under these particular circumstances the proposed use of the premises is an exempt action and not subject to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act *(see,*ECL 8-0105 [4]) and the associated regulations of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation *(see,*6 NYCRR 617.2 [q]). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.