alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tan Ho Chen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 23, 2008



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Tan Ho Chen                     
|Name:  |  | Tan Ho Chen                         
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3 Horizontal Off-Take Model for Application to Reactor Headers of CANDU Type Reactors (NUREG/IA-0238)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0238 (PDF - 109.MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2010**Date Published:**June 2010

**Prepared by:** Bub Dong Chung, Won Jae Lee, and Moonkyu Hwang /KAERI Young Seok Bang, In Goo Kim, and Seung Hoon Ahn /KINS

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) 150-1 Dukjin-Dong, Yuseong-Gu Daejeon, 305-353, Korea

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) 19 Gusung-Dong, Yuseong-Gu Daejeon, 305-338, Korea

Antony Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The RELAP5 liquid entrainment and vapor pull-through models of horizontal pipe have been extended for the better prediction of thermal hydraulics in reactor header of CANDU plant. The model of RELAP5 accounts for the phase separation phenomena and computes the flux of mass and energy through an off-take attached to a horizontal pipe when stratified conditions occur in the horizontal pipe. This model is sometimes referred to as the off-take model. The importance of predicting the fluid conditions through an off-take in a small-break LOCA has been well known. In CANDU reactor, off-take model becomes so important that it controls the coolant flow of 95 feeders connected to the reactor header component where the horizontal stratification occurs. The current RELAP5 model is able to treat the only 3 directions junctions; vertical upward, downward, and side oriented junctions, thus improvements for the off-take model is needed for modeling the exact angles. The RELAP5 off-take model has been modified and generalized by considering the geometric effect of branching angles. Verification calculations have been performed for a conceptual blowdown problem in a pipe with different connected angles of branch. The calculated void fraction and mass flow rate of different location of branches shows the validity of implemented model. Experimental works have been also suggested for the further verification and improvement of models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
AAM-11-423-E August 22, 2011

Exemption No. 10336 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0856

Mr. David Emerson

President DAE Aviation Enterprises Corporation

118 Kimball Road Gilford, NH 03249

Dear Mr. Emerson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 1, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of DAE Aviation Enterprises, Corp. (DAE) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow DAE to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DAE.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant DAE Aviation Enterprises, Corp. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow DAE to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of DAE Aviation Enterprises, Co rp. are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the DAE Aviation Enterprises, Corp. part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Exhibit 4.38



This Supplemental Deed of Assignment is made on May 14, 2004 between:



|(1) | ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC., a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of China (the Vendor); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD., a company organized under the laws of Bermuda (the Purchaser).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Whereas



|(A) | The Vendor and the Purchaser have entered into the Deed of Assignment dated as of December 17, 2003 (the Deed of Assignment), pursuant to which the Vendor assigned to
the Purchaser its entire interest in the Note.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(B) | This Supplemental Deed of Assignment is supplemental to the Deed of Assignment.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the parties hereto as follows:



|1 | Definitions
|- | -----------



Capitalised terms used in this Supplemental Deed of Assignment but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Deed of Assignment.



|2 | Incorporation by Reference
|- | --------------------------



Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms of the Deed of Assignment shall apply to this Supplemental Deed of Assignment as if they were set out
herein and the Deed of Assignment shall be read and construed as one document with this Supplemental Deed of Assignment.



|3 | Amendment to Deed of Assignment
|- | -------------------------------



Article 2 of the Deed of Assignment shall be deleted and replaced with the following:



The Purchase Price shall be paid in full no later than September 30, 2004 to the Vendor through wire transfer to the
bank account as designated by the Vendor.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Deed of Assignment has been executed as of the day and year first above set
forth.



|                                    |  |                   
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.          
|                                    | 
|By:                                 |  | /s/ Shih-Jye Cheng
|Name:                               |  | Shih-Jye Cheng    
|Title:                              |  | Chairman          
|                                   
|ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.
|                                    | 
|By:                                 |  | /s/ Hung-Chiu Hu  
|Name:                               |  | Hung-Chiu Hu      
|Title:                              |  | Chairman          



- 2 -
##### 



Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Company.



| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | By: /s/ Roberto Vivo-Chaneton
| |                              



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | Name: Roberto Vivo-Chaneton

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
**ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIM**  **E** Page 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23 - 0199 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: LYLE JAMES HEAVY RUNNER,

Deceased. **ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME**  On Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County

Cause No. DP - 21 - 56 and DP - 21 - 210 Before the Hon. John W. Parker Bradley J. Jones BULMAN JONES & COOK PLLC P.O. Box 8202 Missoula, MT 59807 - 8202 Tel: (406) 721 - 7744 Fa x: (406) 728 - 9362 staff@bulmanlaw.com Attorney for Appellant/Spouse and Competing Petitioner for Personal Representative Jason T. Holden Katie R. Ranta FAURE HOLDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.C. P.O. Box 2466 Great Falls, MT 59403 Tel: (405) 452 - 6500 Fa x: (406) 452 - 6503 jholden@faureholden.com kranta@faureholden.com Attorney s fo r Appellee/Personal Representative of the Estate of Lyle James Heavy Runner Upon consideration of Appellant ’s m oti on for extension of time pursuant to Rule 26 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, and good cause appearing therefrom, 05/25/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0199**ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIM**  **E** Page 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 5, 2023 to prepare, fil e and serve her opening brief. Electronically Signed Below

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 25 2023
No. 82-5943.

#### Keene *v.*Kansas.

Sup. Ct. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Transfer Factors for Contaminant Uptake by Fruit and Nut Trees (NUREG/CR-7174)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7174 (PDF - 2.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2013**Date Published:** July 2014

**Prepared by:** B. A. Napier R. J. Fellows L. D. Minc

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P. O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

P. R. Reed, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Codes N6455 and V6237

**Prepared for**: Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Transfer of radionuclides from soils into plants is one of the key mechanisms for longterm contamination of the human food chain. Plants absorb nutrients through their roots and transport them via the phloem to active portions of the plant. Nearly all computer models that address soil-to-plant uptake of radionuclides use empirically-derived transfer factors to address this process. Essentially all available soil-to-plant transfer factors are based on measurements in annual crops. Very few measurements are available for tree fruits.

In order to address this limitation, a sampling of various "standard" crops and fruit and nut trees from a single farm was made. This particular farm uses irrigation water from the local aquifer using surface irrigation (not overhead sprinklers) and is registered as an organic farm (no pesticides or refined fertilizers are used). Samples of alfalfa and oats (to compare with available transfer factors) and stems, leaves, and fruits and nuts of almond, apple, apricot, carob, fig, grape, nectarine, pecan, pistachio (natural and grafted), and pomegranate were collected, along with local surface soil. The samples were dried, ground, weighed, and analyzed for trace constituents through a combination of induction-coupled plasma mass spectrometry and instrumental neutron activation analysis for a wide range of naturally-occurring elements.

Analysis results are presented and converted to soil-to-plant transfer factors. These are compared to commonly used and internationally recommended values. Those determined for annual crops (e.g., alfalfa, grain (oats)) are very similar to commonly-used values; those determined for fruits and nuts differ from the generic recommendations in the literature. In most cases, the results of the transfer factors in fruits and nuts from this study are the only data available. Transfer factors for most macro- and micronutrients are slightly reduced in fruits from the generic recommendations; transfer factors for non-essential elements are reduced further. The results tend to support the use of chemical analogues for elements that are not homeostatically regulated (i.e., those for which internal levels are not regulated by the plant at optimal concentrations). These different findings may allow development of tree-fruit-specific transfer models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### Jarvis L. Parks *vs.*George W. Parks.

Aroostook County.

Decided March 16, 1922.

This is an appeal from a decree in equity. The'plaintiff, Jarvis L. Parks, is the owner of a lot of land in Fort Fairfield Village, bounded on the southerly side by a double track of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, on the northerly side by the Aroostook River, on the westerly side by land of the defendant, George W. Parks.

The defendant is the owner of a lot extending from Main Street in Fort Fairfield Village northerly to the Aroostook River. The plaintiff’s lot forms the easterly boundary of that portion of defendant’s lot which lies north of the Canadian Pacific Railway track. Plaintiff’s lot originally formed part of a larger lot extending, like defendant’s lot, from Main Street to the Aroostook River.

In 1883, the predecessors in title of both plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby each granted a strip of land *581from their adjoining'lots, plaintiff’s predecessor granting six feet, and defendant’s predecessor eight feet, extending from the Main Street to the Canadian Pacific Railroad right of way. The agreement provided, that “said space to be by both and their heirs and assigns, forever kept free for mutual use and convenience as a passage way.”

*O. L. Keyes,*for plaintiff.

*Powers & Guild,*for defendant.

The plaintiff claims a legal right to use the passageway, and to have the same unobstructed, by virtue of a deed from Jewell B. Williams, dated April 3, 1912, in which said Williams conveyed his interest “in a right of way from Main Street to the Aroostook River,” &c. The defendant denies that the plaintiff has a legal right of way over the above-described passageway from the Main Street to the railroad, because, as he alleges, the deed to Mr. Williams, plaintiff’s grantor, “did not convey in express terms any interest in the right of way to Williams.” The defendant denied as well all the allegations of the bill as to obstructing the way, and consequent damage.

The sitting Justice, after hearing the evidence, filed the following decree, viz.: “This cause was heard upon bill, answer and replication and proof. A question is raised as to the rights of the plaintiff in the passage way which have never been established. The interferences with such rights complained of are not continuous, nor the injuries resulting therefrom irreparable in their nature. We think the plaintiff should first establish his rights in an action at law which may remove all further complaints; if not this court sitting in equity will then protect him in the enjoyment of them. Bill dismissed with costs.”

Upon a careful reading of the case, we are of opinion that the decree of the sitting Justice is fully supported by the evidence. The decree points out the proper course if the plaintiff desires to insist on his claim. *Boynton*v. *Hall,*100 Maine, 131; *Sterling*v. *Littlefield,*97 Maine, 479; *Varney*v. *Pope,*60 Maine, 192; Bispham’s Principles of Equity, 8th Ed., Par. 440. Appeal dismissed with costs. Decree affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# NRC Meeting at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Postponed Due to Inclement Weather

----

----

**NRC MEETING AT SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR PLANT POSTPONED DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER**

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have announced postponement of a public meeting scheduled at 4:00 p.m. today at the San Onofre nuclear generating station (SONGS) due to inclement weather in Dallas, Texas, which has prevented NRC Region IV officials from flying to the California site.

The meeting had been scheduled at the request of SONGS officials to discuss the safety-conscious work environment at the site.

NRC officials at the agency's Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, said the meeting will be rescheduled, and another announcement will be issued. The public will be invited to observe, and NRC officials will be available at the conclusion of the rescheduled meeting to answer questions from interested observers.

EDITORS NOTE: The contacts for more information on this news release are listed at the NRC's Region II office in Atlanta. This is because the Region IV office at Arlington, Texas, is closed today due to weather.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of September 18, 2019 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-2, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| By:    | /s/ SANJIV YAJNIK |
|   |   |
| Name:  | Sanjiv Yajnik |
| Title: | President |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,107,263
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,107,263
<EQUITIES>                                       2,541
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,113,862
<CASH>                                          61,408
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             734,961
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          32,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,325,839
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,580,869
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            161,302
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                121,425
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                     332,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,325,839
<PREMIUMS>                                      83,230
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             20,793
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,030
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      59,029
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     36,143
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>