FAQ
    
    AGREEMENT STATES
    
    Facility Locator
    
    What's New
    
    Site Help
    
    Index A-Z
    
    Contact Us
    
    Email Updates
      
      
      
      
       
      Report a Safety Concern
                  Search
        Nuclear Reactors
  
  Power Reactors
Research & Test ReactorsOperating Reactors
New ReactorsOperator Licensing
Research ActivitiesNuclear Reactor Quick LinksNuclear Materials
  
  Types of Nuclear Materials
Fuel Cycle Facilities
Medical, Industrial, & Academic UsesUranium Recovery
Materials TransportationMaterials Environmental Reviews
National Materials ProgramNuclear Materials Quick LinksRadioactive Waste
  
  Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
Low-Level Waste
Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
High-Level WasteUranium Mill Tailings
Low-Level Waste Disposal
High-Level Waste DisposalStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Research ActivitiesRadioactive Waste Quick LinksNuclear Security
  
  Domestic Safeguards
Information Security
Radioactive Material SecurityRequired Reporting for Clearance Holders
Insider Threat Program for Licensees
CybersecurityCriminal History & Firearms Checks
Contact UsPublic Meetings & Involvement
  
  The NRC Approach to Open Government
About Meetings Open to the Public
Conferences & SymposiaDocuments for Comment
NRC Rules and Petitions
Facilitating Stakeholder InvolvementNRC Information Quality Guidelines
Subscribe to E-mail UpdatesCommission Schedule
Public Meeting ScheduleAdjudications (Hearings)
Adjudicatory SubmissionsNRC Library
  
  Basic References
Document Collections
ADAMS Public Documents
Public Document Room
LSN LibraryFOIA & Privacy Act
Photos & Videos
Records Management
Training CoursesFAQ Index
Get Copies of Documents
Withholding of Sensitive Information
Controlled Unclassified Information Program (CUI)Electronic Hearing DocketAbout NRC
  
  The Commission
Organization & Functions
Governing Legislation
Plans, Budget, & Performance
Locations
History
Values
Direction-Setting & Policymaking
Research Activities
Radiation ProtectionFire Protection
Safety Culture
How We Regulate
Emergency Preparedness & Response
Public Affairs
Congressional Affairs
Enforcement
International Programs
State & Tribal ProgramsAlternative Dispute Resolution Programs
Privacy Program
Civil Rights Program
Contact Us
Career Opportunities
Contracting Opportunities
Small Businesses
Grant Opportunities
Generic SchedulesOther Links
  
  FAQ
Glossary
Facility Locator
What's NewSite Help
Index A-Z
Contact Us
Email UpdatesNRC Facebook
NRC Twitter Feed
NRC Linkedin
NRC Youtube Channel
NRC Flickr Gallery
NRC Blog Archived
NRC Email Subscriptions - GovDelivery Home
          NRC Library  Document Collections  NUREG-Series Publications  Publications Prepared by NRC ContractorsResults of Field Studies at the Maricopa Environmental Monitoring Site, Arizona (NUREG/CR-5694)

On this page: Publication Information AbstractDownload complete document NUREG/CR-5694 (PDF - 10.5 MB)Publication Information **Manuscript Completed:**May 1999**Date Published:**June 1999 **Prepared by:** M.H. Young*, P.J. Wierenga, A.W. Warrick, L.L. Hofmann S.A. Musil, M. Yao, C.J. Mai, Z. Zou Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 B.R. Scanlon (Subcontractor) Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713 T.J. Nicholson, NRC Project Manager * Currently at School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0512 **Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 NRC Job Code W6151 Availability Notice Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate issues related to alternative monitoring strategies for sites containing low level radioactive wastes. The study consisted of a theoretical evaluation of monitoring strategies and field studies. This NUREG reports on the field activities and the results of the field experiments. A field site, located at the Maricopa Agricultural Center (Maricopa, AZ) was designed for conducting controlled water flow and solute transport studies, and for testing the strengths and weaknesses of four monitoring strategies designated as 1) Monitoring Trench, 2) Monitoring Island, 3) Borehole Monitoring, and 4) Geophysical Monitoring. Field instrumentation was extensive, and designed to support alternative monitoring strategies. Two experiments were conducted at the site covering the time frame from Spring 1997 through Summer 1998. During Experiment 1, water was applied at an average flux of 1.85 cm d-1 to the 50 m by 50 m field plot for 24 days, with bromide tracer added for the first 15 days. The water application period was followed by a redistribution period of 69 days. During Experiment 2, water was applied at an average rate of 1.97 cm d-1 for 33 days with a redistribution period of 177 days. Field experiments ended officially on July 1, 1998. Water movement across the plot was spatially variable during Experiment 1, due mostly to variability in the initial water content, and thus, the soil's hydraulic properties. The results of intrusive and non-intrusive instruments showed that 1) water movement in the western portion of the site was faster than the eastern portion; 2) a zone of more rapid water flow was observed near the northern and central areas of the plot, as confirmed using several types of instruments; and 3) the variability of water movement, as measured using a neutron probe, decreased with increasing depth. During Experiment 2, spatial variability of water movement was significantly reduced in surface soils (< 1.5 m), from a CV ≈ 41.8 % to 4.7 % between Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. The reduced variability was observed because the flux-controlled water application led to more uniform hydraulic property fields, and thus, more uniform water movement. Most of the monitoring systems performed well during the field experiments. Though some data were lost (or considered unreliable) due to electrical problems with the AC power supply and corrosion of electrical connections, an extensive data set was compiled and found useful for comparing monitoring strategies. 
      
      Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021  Home
NEWS RELEASES

EVENT REPORTS

ADAMS

OPEN GOV

DIGITAL GOVERNMENT

THE STUDENT CORNER

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

FOR DEVELOPERS
        About Us
STRATEGIC PLAN

BUDGET & PERFORMANCE

AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT

LICENSE FEES

HISTORY OF THE NRC

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES

NRC ETHICS

AGENCY STATUS

CONTACT US
        Popular Documents
INFO DIGEST

FACT SHEETS & BROCHURES

FORMS

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTALS APPLICATION

ADJUDICATORY SUBMISSIONS

NRC REPORTS - NUREG

NRC REGULATIONS - 10-CFR

INSPECTION REPORTS

PLAIN WRITING

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

RULEMAKING

GLOSSARY
        Stay Connected
    
    
    
    
    United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    
    
    
    
    Regulations.gov

USA.gov

FOIA

Whistleblower Protection

No Fear EEO

Inspector General

Site Map

Accessibility

Privacy Policy

Site Disclaimer

For Employees