alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC, PECO to Discuss Apparent Violations at Peach Bottom Plant

----

----

I-98-57

May 15, 1998

**NRC, PECO TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT PEACH BOTTOM PLANT**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of PECO Energy Company on Thursday, May 21, to discuss three apparent violations of agency requirements at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant. PECO owns and operates Peach Bottom, located in Delta, Pa., and home to twin boiling-water reactors.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for observation.

Two of the apparent violations stem from problems that affected a Unit 3 core spray pump. The component is part of the unit's core spray system, which would be used to keep the reactor core covered and cooled during a loss-of-coolant accident.

On March 24, PECO determined that foreign material had entered and was impeding the performance of a core spray pump. Upon further investigation, the utility learned that fibrous material -- apparently from protective padding that had been used on rigging employed to move equipment during modification work -- had become wrapped around parts of the pump's impeller. (The modification work involved the installation of expanded strainers, or screens, for the facility's emergency core cooling systems.)

The NRC has found that the failure to maintain the pump in a fully operable condition constitutes an apparent violation, as does the failure to carry out the modification work with instructions and procedures in place to prevent the introduction of foreign material into the core spray system.

Another apparent violation involves a failure by PECO to maintain a high-water level trip, or automatic shutdown, function on a Unit 2 reactor feedwater pump. Driven by variable-speed, steam-powered turbines, feedwater pumps provide a flow of water to the reactor, where it is heated and converted into steam, which in turn is used to produce electricity.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

          - [CPCLO Order No. 001-2015]

# AGENCY:

Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of termination of two systems of records.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the United States Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, is terminating the systems of records entitled “Office of Legal Counsel Attorney Assignment Reports, JUSTICE/OLC-001” and “Office of Legal Counsel Central File, JUSTICE/OLC-003.” The Department is eliminating the Attorney Assignment Reports system because the reports no longer exist and have been destroyed. The Department is eliminating the Central File system because the 5 x 7 card index no longer exists and the records maintained in the Central File are not retrieved by the name of individuals or by other identifying information assigned to individuals.

                        Accordingly, the Privacy Act system of records notices last published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 4, 1985, 50 FR 35878, 35879, are removed from the Department's compilation of Privacy Act systems.                    

Dated: January 8, 2015.

Erika Brown Lee,

Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-01211 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-23-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2001

January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
No. 82-5896.

#### Schreiber *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 86-6093.

#### Presser *v.*Montgomery Ward *&*Co., Inc.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 16, 1987, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Stevens,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in *Brown*v. *Herald Co.,*464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed *in forma pauperis.*
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1665 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1665

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ensure that Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
    considers severe local impact in making a recommendation to the 
              President for a major disaster declaration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster Declaration Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LOCAL IMPACT.

    In making recommendations to the President regarding a major 
disaster declaration, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall give greater weight and consideration to severe 
local impact or recent multiple disasters. Further, the Administrator 
shall make corresponding adjustments to the Agency's policies and 
regulations regarding such consideration. Not later than 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall report 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs of the Senate on the changes made to regulations and policies 
and the number of declarations that have been declared based on the new 
criteria.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vincent A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Vincent A. Wasik
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Vincent A. Wasik
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 17, 2003
fs1a3ex10xiii_eliteenergy.htm


 



Exhibit 10.13














UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


 



	Principle US$5,000.00	 December 27, 2010





 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ELITE ENERGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to the order of        Tony Lee                      (the “Lender”), the principal sum of Five Thousand Dollars (US $5,000.00) exactly, together with interest on the outstanding principal hereof from the date hereof at the annual percentage rate of Seven percent (7%) per annum, subject to the terms and conditions of this Promissory Note (this “Note”).







THIS NOTE IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS, TO WHICH THE HOLDER HEREOF, BY ACCEPTANCE HEREOF, AGREES:







1.     Method of Payment.  Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by mail to the address of Lender specified from time to time, currently being                                                          .




2.     Payment.  The outstanding principal hereof and accrued interest shall be due and payable in one singular payment of Five Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars (USD $5,350.00) by December 27, 2011.  The payoff payment shall be paid to Lender via US Postal Certified Mail or other form of courier services and no later than five days from the scheduled payment date.  A fifty dollars (USD $50.00) late payment interest penalty shall be accessed and added to the amount due for each and every month thereof.  Shall the Company failed to deliver the payoff payment for more than a period of three consecutive months, the Lender shall have the right to consider the Company as in default on it promise and call the remaining balance due and payable within a thirty (30) days period after written notice is served to the Company.







3.     Prepayment.  The Company shall have the right to prepay at any time without penalty any amounts outstanding hereunder.  Payment received shall first be applied to the payment of accrued interest and then to the repayment of principal.







4.     Professional Fees.  In the event that this Note is not paid when due, then the Company shall pay to the Lender all costs and expenses incurred by the Lender in enforcing this Note and collecting amounts due hereunder, including reasonable attorneys’ and accountants’ fees.







5.     Governing Law.  This Note shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of California.  The Company and the Lender hereby consent to the jurisdiction of all federal and state courts in California, and agree that venue shall lie exclusively in Santa Clara County, California.







Executed at Santa Clara County, California, effective as of the date first set forth above.







ELITE ENERGIES INC., a Delaware corporation


 




	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:  /s/ Spencer Luo                                              

	 	 	
By: /s/ Stephen Wan                                                   

	 
	
Name: Spencer Luo

	 	 	
Name: Stephen Wan

	 
	
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	
Title: Chief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.3 analysis of steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) accident for NPP Krško (NUREG/IA-0442)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0442 (PDF - 7.88 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2013**Date Published:** March 2014

**Prepared by:** V. Benčik, D. Grgić

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing Unska 3 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) event leads to contamination of the secondary side due to leakage of the radioactive coolant from the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) through the broken Steam Generator (SG) tube(s). Unlike other loss of coolant accidents, an early operator action is necessary to prevent radiological release to environment. The authors have analyzed SGTR for NPP Krško (NEK) using RELAP5/MOD3.3 code for two basic scenarios; i.e. with and without offsite power available. The plant model has been updated taking into account the Resistance Temperature Detector Bypass Elimination (RTDBE) project realized during the 2013 outage. The actions from the standard Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) were modelled and the efficiency of operator actions to prevent radiological release to environment was evaluated. The time of the start of the operator action was selected as a critical parameter influencing occurrence of the release of the contaminated inventory (steam and liquid). In order to stop the steam release from the ruptured SG for the scenario with offsite power available the operator action has to be taken 15 minutes after transient begin, whereas the liquid solid condition and the liquid discharge can be prevented for operator action performed not later than 45 minutes after transient begin. For the scenario with offsite power not available the operator action has to be performed not later than 20 minutes to prevent the broken SG liquid solid condition and the liquid discharge. For both cases the operator action successfully stops the primary to secondary leakage and the inventory release to the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections  552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; SBIR—Review of Novel Methods for Protein Delivery.                    

*Date:*                         February 19, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Stephanie J. Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0291                         *stephanie.webb@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-01365 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 91-6153.

#### Turner *v.*McCarthy et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Michael DeMuro, Respondent, v Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District, Appellant, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District, Appellant, v Yonkers Civil Service Commission, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[631 NYS2d 749]

In two consolidated proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) to review a determination of the Yonkers Civil Service Commission, dated April 19,1993, which found that there was insufficient evidence to warrant terminating Michael DeMuro’s employment, and (2) to compel the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District to reinstate Michael DeMuro to his position, the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered January 14, 1994, which granted Michael DeMuro’s petition to compel the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District to reinstate him to his position and denied the petition of the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District to set aside the determination of the Yonkers Civil Service Commission dated April 19, 1993, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered April 28, 1994, as, upon, in effect, granting the branch of the motion of the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District which was for reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the order entered April 28, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the judgment is vacated, Michael De-Muro’s petition is denied, the petition of the Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District is granted, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the Yonkers Civil Service Commission for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Civil Service Law § 76 (2) provides that where an appeal is taken to a municipal commission, "such commission shall review the record of the disciplinary proceeding and the transcript of the hearing, and shall determine such appeal on the basis of such record and transcript and such oral or written argument as the commission may determine”. In this case, the record reveals that the Yonkers Civil Service Commission (hereinafter the Commission) solicited information and evidence not included in the record of the disciplinary proceeding. *717Therefore, the Commission acted in excess of its statutory authority *(see, Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn.,*78 NY2d 318). Accordingly, this matter is remitted to the Commission to determine the appeal in accordance with the provisions of Civil Service Law § 76.

We have considered Michael DeMuro’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit *(see,*CPLR 217). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.