alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[AAK6006201 156A2100DD AOR3030.999900]


Extending Public Scoping Period for the Snow Mountain Solar 
Project on the Las Vegas Paiute Indian Reservation, Clark County, NV.

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is extending the public 
scoping period for the Snow Mountain Solar Project on the Las Vegas 
Paiute River Indian Reservation.

DATES: Scoping comments are due on January 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chip Lewis at (602) 379-6782; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6858e8f96c88a83918f95a6848f87c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="12717a7b623c7e77657b6152707b733c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BIA published a Notice of Intent to 
Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal Register on 
November 19, 2014 (79 FR 68909) and provided for a 30-day scoping 
comment period. The BIA is extending the comment period from December 
19, 2014, to January 30, 2015 and will accept any comments received 
prior to January 30, 2015. Please refer to the November 19, 2014 (79 FR 
68909) Notice of Intent for project details and commenting 
instructions.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-01585 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-2A-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### State ex rel. Union Free High School District of the City of Crandon, etc., Respondent, vs. Robbins, Town Clerk, Appellant.

*October 11*

November *8, 1922.*

*State ex rel. Union Free High School Dist. v. Chaney, ante,*p. 585, followed.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Forest county: W. B. Quinlan, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Eastman & Goldman*of Marinette.

For the respondent there was a brief by *John F. Hooper*of Crandon and *Eberlein & Larson*of Shawano, and oral argument by *Mr-. Albert S. Larson*and *Mr. Hooper.*

Vinje, C. J.

This case is identical in its facts so far as the appeal is concerned with that of *State ex rel. Union Free High School District v. Chaney,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 585, 190 N. W. 353), and is governed by that decision.

*By the Court.-*— Order affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6405

RENARD WHEELER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-3407-CCB) Submitted: October 6, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Renard Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, AnnNorman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wheeler v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-3407-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
|                       |  |  |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA    
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2022-1





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of May 4, 2022 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 24 th day of March, 2023.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President, Financial Services
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsPacific Northwest National Laboratory Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Nickel-Base Allo

# Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Nickel-Base Alloys: Stress Corrosion Cracking of Cold Worked Alloy 690 (NUREG/CR-7103, Volume 3, PNNL-24647)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7103, Volume 3 (PDF - 20.06 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2015**Date Published:**July 2016

**Prepared by:** M.B. Toloczko, N.R. Overman, M.J. Olszta, and S.M. Bruemmer

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland, Washington 99352

Greg Oberson NRC Contracting Officer's Representative

NRC Job Code Number N6925

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The report summarizes the results of a testing program to evaluate the effects of cold work, including rolling, forging, and tensile straining, on the primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) susceptibility of alloy 690. Alloy 690 is a high-chromium, nickel-base material used in reactor pressure vessel head penetration nozzles, steam generator divider plates, and other components. Prior testing indicated that an increase in the amount of cold work increases the crack growth rate in alloy 690, but the relationships between the degree of cold work, the material microstructure, and the cracking behavior were not systematically investigated. For this study, PWSCC growth rates were measured for a total of 37 different alloy 690 specimens in simulated primary water reactor environments. The alloy 690 test materials included six different heats of extruded control-rod-drive mechanism (CRDM) tubing and five plate/bar heats with variations in the degree of cold work, from no cold work to cold work greater than 30%. In addition, different thermo-mechanical treatments were applied to some heats of material before cold working, thereby altering properties such as the grain boundary carbide morphology, to assess how this would affect the PWSCC response. Materials were examined by optical microscopy, electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, and other characterization techniques to devise a mechanistic explanation for the test results and to identify the key parameters that control the PWSCC susceptibility.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Detonation Calculations Using a Modified Version of CSQII: Examples for Hydrogen-Air Mixtures (NUREG/CR-3719,SAND83-2624)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3719 (PDF - 1.74 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed**: March 1984 **Date Published:**August 1984

**Prepared by:** R.K. Byers Division 6444 Sandia National Laboratories  Albuquerque. New Mexico 87185 Operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC04-76DP00789 

**Prepared for:** Severe Accident Assessment Branch Division of Accident Evaluation Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

Under Memorandum of Understanding DOE 40-550-75

NRC FIN A-1246

Availability Notice

## Abstract

 CSQ is a well-tested and versatile wave propagation computer program, a modified version of which has been used to perform a number of USNRC-supported analyses of detonations of hydrogen-air mixtures in nuclear reactor containment buildings. The modifications, from a user's viewpoint, are fairly minor, and this version of CSQ is being prepared for release to interested organizations. This report documents the use of CSQ in this form. as well as certain codes which aid in performing the detonation calculations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1850 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, as the ‘‘Donna Sauers 

Besko Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2017 

Mr. AMASH (for himself, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. HUIZENGA, 

Mr. KILDEE, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. MITCHELL, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. LEVIN, 

Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. TROTT, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, Mr. CONYERS, 

and Mr. UPTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake Odessa, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DONNA SAUERS BESKO POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 907 Fourth Avenue in Lake 

6 Odessa, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko Post Office’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1850 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Donna Sauers Besko 

5 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
H. R. 1733 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the energy 

and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL. 

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with the Administrator 

of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget, shall— 

(1) review and update the report prepared pursuant to 

section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005; 

(2) after consultation with relevant Federal, State, and 

local agencies and affected industry and stakeholder groups, 

update data that was used in preparing that report; and 

(3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordinated Federal 

strategy to increase the beneficial reuse of used lubricating 

oil, that— 

(A) is consistent with national policy as established 

pursuant to section 2 of the Used Oil Recycling Act of 

1980 (Public Law 96–463); and 

(B) addresses measures needed to— 

(i) increase the responsible collection of used oil; 

(ii) disseminate public information concerning 

sustainable reuse options for used oil; and 

(iii) promote sustainable reuse of used oil by Federal agencies, recipients of Federal grant funds, entities 

contracting with the Federal Government, and the general public. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

No. 98-1894

Darnell Tinker,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Craig Hanks,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. No. 1:97 CV 230 AS--Allen Sharp, Judge.

Submitted June 13, 2001--Decided June 28, 2001

Before Posner, Easterbrook, and Kanne, Circuit Judges.

Posner, Circuit Judge. A state prisoner who seeks federal habeas corpus relief must with immaterial exceptions institute his habeas corpus proceeding within a year of when his conviction became final. 28 U.S.C. sec. 2244(d)(1)(A). But this period is tolled while "a properly filed application" for state postconviction review is pending. sec. 2244(d)(2). When last this case was before us, we held that an application for permission to file a second state postconviction proceeding is not a "properly filed application" for state postconviction relief, and so the district court was correct to hold that the petitioner’s federal habeas corpus proceeding was untimely. 172 F.3d 990 (7th Cir. 1999). The Supreme Court vacated our decision
and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 121 S. Ct. 361 (2000). 121 S. Ct. 476 (2000).

Artuz holds that an application for state postconviction relief is "properly filed" even if there are good defenses to it, the requisite propriety having to do not with the merits of the application but with whether it conforms to purely formal requirements such as "the form of the document, the time limits upon itsdelivery, the court and office in which

it must be lodged, and the requisite filing fee," id. at 364 (footnote omitted)--but also "preconditions imposed on particular abusive filers." The Court illustrated by quoting with pregnant emphases 28 U.S.C. sec. 2244(b)(3)(A), a model prefiling provision: "Before a second or successive application permitted by this section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application." 121 S. Ct. at 364 (emphases in original). And elsewhere the Court’s opinion remarks "a condition to filing, as opposed to a condition to obtaining relief." Id. at
365.

This case involves the former, a filing precondition, rather than the latter, a relief precondition. To prevent abusive repetitive filings by its prisoners, Indiana courts, much like federal courts by virtue of section 2244(b)(3)(A), quoted in the preceding paragraph, require the would-be applicant for postconviction relief to ask leave of court to file a second or other successive application for postconviction relief. Ind. Post-Conviction R. 1(12); Indiana ex rel. Woodford v. Marion Superior Court, 655 N.E.2d 63, 65-66 (Ind. 1995). That is a prefiling requirement. It is the nonpecuniary equivalent of a stiff filing fee--an alternative of limited utility in dealing with prisoners. Our decision conforms to the Supreme Court’s ruling, and we therefore reinstate it.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFirst American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 19thday of November, 2007.                                                                                                                
|   

JOHN BRIAN NICHOLSJohn Brian Nichols, President and ChiefExecutive Officer

















---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01591]

[[Page 4619]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9017]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rembrandt: A Decade of Brilliance (1648-1658)''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 28, 2014, notice was published on page 70913 of 
the Federal Register (volume 79, number 229) of determinations made by 
the Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Rembrandt: A 
Decade of Brilliance (1648-1658).'' The referenced notice is corrected 
here to include additional objects as part of the exhibition. Notice is 
hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority 
vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, 
as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Rembrandt: A Decade of Brilliance (1648-1658),'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The additional objects are imported pursuant to 
a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the University 
of San Diego's University Galleries, from on or about March 21, 2015, 
until on or about May 22, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: January 22, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-01591 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2011

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
No. 82-5889.

#### Presley *v.*Kentucky.

Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0624

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

KENNETH WAYNE DALY,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John W. Larson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2023

06/07/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0624