alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of Total Loss of Feedwater LOFT LP-FW-1 Test using RELAP5/MOD3.3 (NUREG/IA-0526)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0526 (PDF - 4.37 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2020**Date Published:**August 2021

**Prepared by:**Andrej ProšekJožef Stefan InstituteJamova cesta 39SI-1000, Ljubljana, SloveniaK. Tien, NRC Project ManagerDivision of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001Prepared as part of The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Availability Notice

## Abstract

After Fukushima-Daiichi in the Europe the design extension conditions (DEC) were introduced as preferred method for giving due consideration to the complex sequences and severe accidents without including them in the design basis conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the latest RELAP5/MOD3.3 Patch 05 computer code for the simulation of such DEC. The LP-FW-01 test performed in 1983 on the Loss of Fluid Test Facility (LOFT) has been used for simulation. The LP-FW-01 test represents a fault sequence in which a total loss of feedwater to the steam generator is followed by recovery by primary system feed-and-bleed. The RELAP5/MOD3 steady state input deck available from literature has been adapted to RELAP5/MOD3.3 Patch 05, while transient input deck to simulate LP-FW-01 test has been newly developed. The simulation results for short term response (0-300 s) and long term response (0-7000 s) are presented in the report. The results suggest that in the short term simulation of LP-FW-1 test the simulated results matches the major events very good. In the long term the simulation results suggest that the entrainment to the surge line is important for the correct results.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, August 30, 2021
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 28
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1701 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1701

    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 
     portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2017

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Bridenstine, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Jones, 
  Mr. Lance, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Olson, and Mr. Rice of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on 
House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the costs of painting 
     portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Government-funded Oil-
painting Act'' or the ``EGO Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PORTRAITS.

    (a) Prohibition.--No funds appropriated or otherwise made available 
to the Federal Government may be used to pay for the painting of a 
portrait of an officer or employee of the Federal Government, including 
the President, the Vice President, a Member of Congress, the head of an 
executive agency, or the head of an office of the legislative branch.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``executive agency'' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 133 of title 41, United States Code; and
            (2) the term ``Member of Congress'' includes a Delegate or 
        Resident Commissioner to Congress.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Burn Mode Analysis of Horizontal Cable Tray Fires (NUREG/CR-2431, SAND81-0079)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2431 (PDF - 2.45 MB)
        Revised Summary and Conclusions (PDF - 103 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**February 1982

**Prepared by:** Fritz R. Krause (Los Alamos National Laboratory) Willard H. Schmidt Systems Safety Technology Division Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy 

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology  Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research****U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Under Memorandum of Understanding DOE 40-550-75

NRC FIN A-1010

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Electrical cables constitute a serious fire hazard for nuclear power plants because the plastic insulation material is combustible and large quantities of cables are used in the plants. Nuclear power plant fires often continue to burn in the presence of smoke, whereas building fires usually burn in the presence of clear air, since smoke escapes through windows and doors before descending to the fuel. Fire growth classifications (realms) by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) thus may not be completely applicable for fire hazards analyses of nuclear power plants.

Electrical cable fire tests have been conducted at the Sandia Fire Research Facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in order to evaluate cable tray fire safety criteria for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. A burn mode concept was developed in order to describe and classify the thermodynamic phenomena which occur in the presence of smoke and to compare the fire growth and recession of different cable types under otherwise unchanged fire test conditions. The importance of deep seated fires in cable trays from the standpoint of propagation, detection, and suppression is emphasized. The cable tray fire tests demonstrate that fire recession and deep seated fires can result from a descending smoke layer and that reignition and secondary fire growth is possible by readmission of fresh air.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order filed July 5, 2016

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 15

- 00986

- CR

____________ BRETTON JAMES FOX , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Co urt Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14CR0687



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State ’ s Exhibit 4 and
State ’ s Exhibit 6

.
The exhibit clerk of the 10th District Court is direc ted to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State ’ s Exhibit 4 and State ’ s Exhibit 6 , on or before July 15, 2016

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State ’ s Exhibit 4 and State ’ s Exhibit 6 , to the clerk of the 10th District Court.

PER CURIAM
No. 90-6129.

#### Peters *v.*Runda et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Martin Whitmore, Appellant, v Raul Russi, as Chairman of New York State Division of Parole, et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 1014]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Dadd, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Johnson, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 667]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered May 25, *5201993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of *41⁄2*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to establish defendant’s guilt of possession of drugs with intent to sell them. The evidence of the codefendant’s completed sale to the undercover officer in defendant’s presence and of defendant’s subsequent reprimand of the codefendant for having sold to someone who might be a police officer was properly admitted, since it was "inextricably interwoven’’ with the testimony concerning the negotiations between defendant and the undercover *(People v Vails,*43 NY2d 364, 368), and its prejudicial impact as proof of an uncharged crime was outweighed by its probative value in proving that defendant possessed drugs with the intent to sell them *(see, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 242). The courtroom was properly closed during the testimony of the undercover officer based on her *Hinton*hearing testimony that she was involved in numerous ongoing long-term investigations in the area of defendant’s arrest and had been threatened on prior occasions by buy subjects *(People v Martinez,*82 NY2d 436; *People v Mason,*216 AD2d 149). Concur — Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Vincent A. WasikVincent A. Wasik Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer February 17, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                       8,305,683
<SECURITIES>                                15,748,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,608,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                   198,801
<INVENTORY>                                 17,942,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,640,788
<PP&E>                                       8,068,136
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,411,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,548,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,757,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,194,097
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,601,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,548,301
<SALES>                                     13,402,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,402,653
<CGS>                                        6,039,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,039,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,030,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,092,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,938,333
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Indiginet, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Ellis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         Date: March 30, 2004.

                                            /s/ Mark Ellis
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Mark Ellis, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (PPD) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 3, 2010



/s/ Daniel G. DarazsdiDaniel G. DarazsdiChief Financial Officer
#### Kahre-Richardes Family Foundation, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Village of Baldwinsville et al., Respondents.

(Ap*827peal No. 2.)

[632 NYS2d 993]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs, judgment ordered imposing sanction and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with same Memorandum as in *Kahre-Richardes Family Found, v Village of Baldwinsville*(219 AD2d 826 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — Sanctions.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Kensey Nash
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



               Dated: November 14, 2002           /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jean
Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of XA,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of XA,
Inc.





By:/s/ Jean
Wilson


Jean
Wilson


Chief
Accounting Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)





April 15,
2008
No: II-22-003 March 18, 2022

Contact: Dave Gasperson, 404-997-4417

NRC to Hold Virtual Meeting to Discuss Performance of the

Catawba, McGuire, and Oconee Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2021 safety performance of the 

Catawba, McGuire, and Oconee nuclear power plants during a virtual meeting to be held on 

March 23.

The event will begin at 5 p.m., Eastern time, led by the NRC staff responsible for 

conducting plant inspections. The public and the media will be able to access the meeting via

Teams. For those without access to Teams, the telephone conference number is (301) 576-2978, 

passcode 4923795#.

Duke Energy operates the three plants. The two-unit Catawba and three-unit Oconee plants 

are located in South Carolina, and the two-unit McGuire plant is in North Carolina. 

NRC resident inspectors and other inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta 

performed inspections at the three sites. They found that the Catawba, McGuire, and Oconee plants 

operated safely during 2021. All three plants are currently under the NRC’s normal level of 

oversight.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow, or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

The annual assessment letters for the Catawba plant, the McGuire plant, and the Oconee 

plant, including upcoming inspection plans for the plants, are available on the NRC website.

Current performance information for the plants is available and updated quarterly.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30444

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID LEE HILL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DON HATHAWAY, Sheriff,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-492

- - - - - - - - - -

January 17, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Lee Hill, Louisiana inmate #42520, appeals the

district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant. We

have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. 

For essentially the same reasons upon which the district court

relied, though its adoption of the magistrate judge’s report, we

conclude that the court did not err in granting judgment for the

defendant and dismissing the suit. See Little v. Liquid Air
No. 96-30444

- 2 -

Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Hill’s pending motions before this court are without merit

and are DENIED.

AFFIRMED. MOTIONS DENIED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 1998

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 INSIGNIA SOLUTIONS PLC CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Insignia Solutions plc (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Mark E. McMillan, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Mark E. McMillanMark E. McMillanChief Executive OfficerPrincipal
Accounting Officer andPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 16, 2005