alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE RALEIGH GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH.

The proper judgment in an action against a city or town, upon a recovery for necessary expenses is an Alternative, and not a *Peremptory Mandamus.*(The other points decided are the same as those in *Tuclcer*v. *The Oity of*Raleigh, ante, page —. See Syllabus thereto.)

Civil *Action,*tried before Watts, J., at January Term, 1876, of Wake Superior Court.

The same points were involved in the case of *Tuclcer*v. *The Oity of Raleigh, ante.*

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, according to the prayer of the complaint, and the defendant appealed.

*Busbee & Busbee,*for the appellant.

*Haywood, Towle*and *Snow,*contra.

Reade, J.

The only point in this case is covered by *Tucker*v. *The City of Raleigh,*at this term. It is there decided that the Funding Act of February, 1875, did not require the sanction of the popular vote.

We think, however, that the judgment ought to have been an *alternative mandamus,*as the City may show cause, as that it prefers to pay the debt rather than fund, &c.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,029,275
<SECURITIES>                                 3,663,074
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,229,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    824,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,105,323
<PP&E>                                       6,129,618
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,177,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,567,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          551,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,215
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,592,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,567,898
<SALES>                                        534,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,565,290
<CGS>                                          816,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,365,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (679,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (679,680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (679,680)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2015221EN.01000701.xml

| 22.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/7

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2014 of 20 November 2014 laying down rules pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund with regard to the information to be sent by Member States, as well as on data needs and synergies between potential data sources

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 334 of 21 November 2014
  )

In Annex I, Part C, Field 14, column ‘Data needs and synergies’:

for:

‘Data field 53 of Annex III to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014’,

read:

‘Data field 80 of Annex III to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014’.

In Annex I, Part C, Field 15, column ‘Data needs and synergies’:

for:

‘Data field 54 of Annex III to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014’,

read:

‘Data field 81 of Annex III to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014’.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Alan HoverdAlan HoverdChief Financial Officer




Dated: February 13, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of Loss of Feedwater Heater Transients for Lungmen ABWR by TRACE/PARCS (NUREG/IA-0429)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0429 (PDF - 2.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2013**Date Published:** September 2013

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Tsung-Sheng Feng*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, TAIWAN

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The TRACE/PARCS model of Lungmen ABWR was used to evaluate the loss of feedwater heater (LOFH) transient of the Lungmen startup tests. The Loss of Feedwater heater transient is an anticipated operational occurrence (AOO) event. Identifications of the responses of the Lungmen models and verification of the plant vendor's analysis results are crucial in the plant licensing analysis. PARCS, a three-dimensional neutronics simulator, is capable of performing detail transient three-dimensional core power distributions and can be coupled with TRACE for thermal hydraulic feedback analysis. The feedwater enthalpy entering the RPV in this event is modeled as a 30 seconds time constant decay curve. When feedwater temperature drops approximately 37°C, the feedwater control system (FWCS) triggers reactor internal pump (RIP) runback and selected control rod run in (SCRRI) immediately. The colder feedwater temperature collapses the voids, which leads to the void reactivity increase and decreases RPV water level. SCRRI can reduce the core reactivity and core temperature which then increase the Doppler reactivity. The water level would fluctuate between L3 and L8, having enough safety margins to avoid either low or high water level scram setpoints. On the other hand, we have also simulated another case without RIP runback and SCRRI. The sensitivity studies of this transient include different time constants, SCRRI delay times, RIP runback rates and RIP runback delay times. Furthermore, the study of 18 CHANs model and 206 CHANs model performance with TRACE/PARCS has been evaluated. The SNAP animation model can show three dimensional visualized results of different core parameters.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 90-6208.

#### Collins *v.*Halcott et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No: II-19-027 April 29, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Public Meeting to Discuss

Safety Performance of Westinghouse Columbia Fuel Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for May 7 to 

discuss the results of an NRC regulatory safety performance review of the Westinghouse nuclear 

fuel fabrication facility in Columbia, S.C.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the South Carolina State Museum’s Gervais 

Street Room, 301 Gervais St. in Columbia. The public can observe the meeting and the NRC staff 

will be available to answer questions or provide additional information following the formal 

presentations.

The NRC review concluded that the facility operated safely in 2018. The review evaluated 

the areas of safety operations, radiological controls, facility support, safeguards and other areas,

identifying no areas requiring improvement. However, the facility remains under increased 

inspection and oversight due to a Confirmatory Order issued in 2017 following a safety-significant 

event related to an unexpected accumulation of uranium found in a process scrubber.

The NRC plans to conduct the core inspection program for nuclear fuel facilities of this type 

during the current review period, which ends Dec. 31, 2020.

The NRC letter discussing the licensee performance review for the Westinghouse facility is 

available on the NRC website.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFROMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 2000 FORM 10-QSB OF WASHINGTON BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,133
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,556
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,801
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             974
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               974
<LOANS>                                         81,182
<ALLOWANCE>                                        503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,345
<DEPOSITS>                                      73,609
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,650
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                881
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              224
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 114,345
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,914
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,040
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   119
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,073
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,499
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,421
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,652
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       71
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,290
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         787
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       787
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       810
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   472
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       43
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  503
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               503
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Commissioner Merrifield to Hold Press Briefing at TMI

----

----

I-99-20 March 22, 1999

 

**NRC COMMISSIONER MERRIFIELD TO HOLD PRESS BRIEFING AT TMI**

Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with reporters on Monday, March 29, during a visit to the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant. The press briefing is scheduled to begin at 3:30 p.m. in the auditorium at the plant's training center, which is located on Route 441, behind the TMI Visitors Center. Route 441 is the road adjacent to the Middletown, Pa., plant.

Questions will be restricted to members of the working press.

The Commissioner is traveling to Three Mile Island to tour the facility and meet with representatives of plant operator GPU Nuclear Inc., NRC resident inspector staff and the press. Dr. William D. Travers, the NRC's Executive Director for Operations, will accompany the Commissioner.

Commissioner Merrifield, one of five members of the Commission, began his duties last October.

EDITORS: A biographical sketch of Commissioner Merrifield is available on the NRC Internet site at www.nrc.gov.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (747)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,343
<PP&E>                                          16,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,061)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,098
<SALES>                                         40,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,727
<CGS>                                           19,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
# u.s. DEPARTMENT OF



# TRANSPORTATI~

# Fr;

# E

# I 

# v ED OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## DEC

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Complainant
Vs. PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPT. Respondent 

## 292016 HLo.,'iiNG DOCKET

Docket No. FAA-2013-1086 FAA Case No. 2011S0190181
JudgeJ. E. Sullivan MOTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME 

### Hereby appears Respondent, Puerto Rico Police Department, represented by the subscribing counsel, and states, alleges and requests as follows: 1. 

### On November 9, 2016 Respondent received bycertified mail FAA's first Discovery Request ofInterrogatories, Request for Production ofDocumentsand Requestfor Admission. 2. The hereby appearing party has been compiling the pertinent information to respond to the above. Nevertheless, as of this date, there is still certain information that Respondent is verifying. 3. In order to responsibly provide all relevant information and documents, in accordance with Rule 6 (b) of the Rules of Federal Procedures, we are respectfully requesting an extension of 20 days to answer FAA's First Discovery Requests.Page 2 of2 Respectfully submitted this 7 day of December 2016.



# \,~ll{)d **~t4f7y~}** 

# .

**Nazih:c{~~i:lrahman** Soler [__-- Attorney Office of Legal Affairs PO Box 71200 San Juan, PR 00936 Phone 787-793-1234 ext. 3067, 2203 Fax. 787-781-7993
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Motion Requesting Extension ofTime has been sent by the following methods: Original and one copy via certified mail on December 7, 2016: FederalAviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue SW WilburWright Building Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 One copyvia certified mailon December 7, 2016: Christopher R. Stevenson Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337
Honorable JudgeJ.E. Sullivan Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 10, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10605

Summary Calendar

 

SU-INN HO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES MILLER, Chairman of Board of Regents

The University of Texas System; ROBERT E. WITT,

President The University of Texas at Arlington;

PHILIP COHEN, dean of the Graduate School The

University of Texas at Arlington; RICHARD B. 

TIMMONS, Chairman of the Department of Chemistry

Department Professor of the Chemistry Department

The University of Texas at Arlington; KRISHNAN

RAJESHWAR, Professor of the Chemistry Department

The University of Texas at Arlington; REED J. BLAU,

Assistant Professor of the Chemistry Department The

University of Texas at Arlington a resident of Cache

County, Utah,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CV-85-A

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Su-Inn Ho appeals the summary judgment in favor of the

defendants on her civil rights action dismissing her civil rights
No. 03-10605

-2-

** Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923);

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462

(1983).

and tort claims regarding her dismissal from the doctoral

chemistry program at the University of Texas at Arlington and the

misdeeds of the individual defendants during a prior state

lawsuit challenging her failure to obtain her doctoral degree. 

To the extent that Ho is challenging the proceedings in the prior

state court action, those claims are “inextricably intertwined”

with the state court’s judgment, and the district court lacked

jurisdiction to consider the allegations under the RookerFeldman** doctrine. Ho’s attempts to challenge the propriety of

the ruling in her first civil action by the federal district

court is also improper. To the extent that Ho is repeating her

challenges to her dismissal from the university’s doctoral

program, her claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. 

See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-66 (1985); Nilsen v.

City of Moss Point, Miss., 701 F.2d 556, 560 (5th Cir.1983)(en

banc). The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
No. 90-6209.

#### Gomez *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[AAK6006201 156A2100DD AOR3030.999900]


Extending Public Scoping Period for the Aiya Solar Project on the 
Moapa River Indian Reservation, Clark County, NV

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is extending the public 
scoping period for the Aiya Solar Project on the Moapa River Indian 
Reservation.

DATES: Scoping comments are due on January 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chip Lewis at (602) 379-6782; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1c2c9c8d18fcdc4d6c8d2e1c3c8c08fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c7f74756c3270796b756f5c7e757d327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BIA published a Notice of Intent to 
Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal Register on 
November 21, 2014 (79 FR 69522) and provided for a 30-day scoping 
comment period. The BIA is extending the comment period from December 
22, 2014, to January 30, 2015. Please refer to the November 21, 2014 
(79 FR 69522) Notice of Intent for project details and commenting 
instructions.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-01583 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-2A-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 90-6306.

#### Pineda *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.