alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Finn,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  August 16, 2004


By:    /s/ Thomas M. Finn
       ------------------
Name:  Thomas M. Finn
Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       20
#### State ex rel. Perry and others, Appellants, vs. Board of Supervisors of Milwaukee County and others, Respondents.

*April 10*

May *9, 1933.*

*420
      *Albert B. Houghton*of Milwaukee, for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by *William A. Zabel,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *Oliver L. O’Boyle,*corporation counsel, and *C. Stanley Perry,*assistant corporation counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. O’Boyle*and *Mr. Perry.*

Wickhem, J.

The legal questions involved in this appeal are identical with those dealt with in *State ex rel. Milwaukee Sewerage Commission v. Board of Supervisors of Milwaukee County, ante,*p. 412, 248 N. W. 454, and the disposition of that case governs this appeal, and compels a reversal of the order.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed, and cause remanded with directions to- sustain the demurrer to the return, and for further proceedings according to law.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of TRACE 5.0 Against ROSA-2 Test 5, Main Steam Line Break with Steam Generator Tube Rupture (NUREG/IA-0505)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,457,065
<SECURITIES>                                11,611,967
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,845,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,128,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,507,687
<PP&E>                                      12,569,215
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,011,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,525,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,943,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,459
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,544,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,525,342
<SALES>                                      2,584,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,583,566
<CGS>                                        1,714,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,868,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,128,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,128,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,128,065
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 13.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER
63 OF 
  TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Medicure Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for
the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1) the Form 20-F fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 28, 2011 | /s/
      Albert Friesen                              
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Albert D. Friesen Ph D., Chief Executive
      Officer
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)                         
|                         |                                                       
|                         |                                                       
|Date: September 28, 2011 | /s/
      James Kinley                                
|                         | James F. Kinley CA, Chief Financial Officer           
|                         | (Principal Financial Officer)                         



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Washington Bancorp
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
<TABLE>

              Exhibit   11                                For the three months                          For the six months
                                                           ended December 31,                           ended December 31,
                                                    1998     1997      1998     1997     1998       1997       1998       1997
                                                    Basic    Basic    Diluted   Diluted   Basic      Basic    Diluted     Diluted
Computation of weighted average                      EPS      EPS       EPS       EPS      EPS        EPS       EPS         EPS
       number of common shares
       outstanding:                    
<S>                                                <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>    
Common shares outstanding
       at the beginning of the
       period ................................     651,133   651,133   651,133  651,133   651,133    651,133    651,133     651,133
Unreleased common shares held by
       the Employee Stock Ownership
       Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
       of the period .........................     (41,270)  (45,367)  (41,270) (45,367)  (42,313)  (46,333)    (42,313)    (46,333)
Weighted average common shares
       released by the ESOP during
       the period ............................         522       483       522      483     1,044       966       1,044         966
Weighted average common shares
       outstanding - Stock Option
       Plan ..................................          --        --    15,823   17,779        --        --      16,517      16,838
Weighted average common shares
       into treasury .........................     (53,127)       --   (53,127)      --   (44,269)       --     (44,269)         --
                                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total average shares outstanding .............     557,258   606,249   573,081  624,028   565,595   605,766     582,112     622,604
                                                   ================================================================================

Net income ...................................    $172,425  $199,230   172,425  199,230   367,588   356,450    $367,588    $356,450
                                                  =================================================================================

Net income per share .........................    $   0.31  $   0.33  $   0.30 $   0.32  $   0.65  $   0.59    $   0.63    $   0.57
                                                  =================================================================================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Boynton, certify that: 

1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of Commerce One,Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: April 29, 2004

/s/ CharlesBoynton
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Detonability of H2-Air-Diluent Mixtures  (NUREG/CR-4905,  SAND85-1263)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-4905 (PDF - 11.8 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 1987**Date Published:**June 1987

**Prepared by:** Sheldon R. Tieszen, Martin P. Sherman William B. Benedick, Marshall Berman Reactor Safety Research Department Severe Accident Containment Response Division Sandia National Laboratories  P.O. Box 5800 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 Operated by Sandia Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC04-76DP00789

**Prepared for:** Accident Evaluation Branch Division of Reactor System Safety Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Under Memorandum of Understanding DOE 40-550-75

NRC FIN A-1246

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes the Heated Detonation Tube (HDT). Detonation cell width and velocity results are presented for H2-air mixtures, undiluted and diluted with CO2 and H22O for a range of H2 concentration, initial temperature and pressure. The results show that the addition of either CO2 or H2O significantly increases the detonation cell width and hence reduces the detonability of the mixture. The results also show that the detonation cell width is reduced (detonability is increased) for increased initial temperature and/or pressure.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 774 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-472, K2025-469.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27950 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

FLEET NATIONAL BANK

FLEET HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2003-1

----

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Fleet National Bank("FNB"), pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as ofApril 15, 2003 (the "Agreement"), among Fleet Home Equity Loan Trust2003-1, a Delaware statutory trust (the "Trust"), Fleet NationalBank, a national banking association, as seller (in such capacity, the"Seller") and as servicer (in such capacity, the"Servicer"), Fleet Home Equity Loan, LLC, a Delaware limitedliability company, as depositor (the "Depositor"), and U.S. BankNational Association, a national banking association, as indenture trustee onbehalf of the Class A Noteholders (in such capacity, the "Indenture Trustee"),does hereby certify that:

1. FNB is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorizedpursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate tothe Trustee.

3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscalyear ended March 31, 2005, and of its performance under the Agreement, wasconducted under my supervision.

4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of myknowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under theAgreement throughout the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 and no default in theperformance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as setforth in paragraph 5 below.

5. The following is a description of each default in theperformance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreementknown to me to have been made by the Servicer during the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2005 which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default,(ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and(iii) the current status of each such default:

None

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this20th day of May 2005.

 

FLEET NATIONAL BANKas Servicer, 

By: /s/Gretchen Hefner      Gretchen Hefner      Senior Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott McDaniel, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d. 957]

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in directing him to make restitution to the victim of his assault in the amount of $2,822.33. Specifically, he contends that it was error to direct him to make restitution for the cost of medical care paid by the victim’s insurer and for the sick leave borne by the victim’s employer. We disagree with defendant that he should not be required to pay those sums. We agree, however, that, in the particular circumstances presented, those sums should not be paid to the victim of the assault. Payment of those sums to the victim would result in a windfall not envisioned by the restitution statutes *(see, People v Turco,*130 AD2d 785, 786-787), but restitution may be directed to be made to those other than the direct victim of a crime *(see, e.g., People v Cruz,*81 NY2d 996, *affg*184 AD2d 521; *People v Hall-Wilson,*69 NY2d 154; *People v Chery,*126 AD2d 659). Here, the victim’s insurer paid $341 for medical expenses incurred by the victim as a result of the *862assault. The victim’s employer paid the victim $544.16 for sick leave used by the victim as a result of the assault. The insurer and the employer are " 'victim[s] in their own right’ ” *(People v Hall-Wilson, supra,*at 158). Therefore, we modify the judgment by providing that restitution be paid as follows: the sum of $341 to the victim’s insurer; the sum of $544.16 to the victim’s employer; and the remaining sum of $1,892.17 to the victim. The manner of payment and amount of restitution directed by the court is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J. — Assault, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Coupled RELAP/PARCS Full Plant Model – Assessment of a Cooling Transient in Trillo Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG/IA-0255)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0255 (PDF - 17 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2010**Date Published:** August 2011

**Prepared by:** J. C. Martínez-Murillo1, M. Novo1, R. Miró2, T. Barrachina2, and G. Verdú2

1Almaraz-Trillo AIE Av Manoteras 46Bis, 28050 Madrid SPAIN

2 Institute for Industrial, Radiophysical and Environmental Safety (ISIRYM) Universitat Politècnica de València Camí de Vera, s/n 46022 Valencia, SPAINM

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The agreement on technical exchange and cooperation between the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN) of Spain and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the field of nuclear safety research.

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the methodology to change from a 0-D kinetics core in a RELAP5/Mod3.3 full plant model of Trillo NPP to a coupled RELAP5/PARCS 3-D core. The coupled plant model is assessed against a real cooling transient that deformed the core power axial profile.

The coupled steady state core model was adjusted to a CASMO/SIMULATE calculation by condensing the cross-sections with the SIMTAB methodology. The need of information exchange between RELAP and PARCS during the transient was the reason for two modifications of the coupling between both codes.
        - The CASMO/SIMULATE calculation of the initial core conditions correspondent to the date of the transient was performed by Iberdrola Ingeniería. 
        - The SIMTAB methodology used to build the PARCS input file, the automated tools for core input files mapping and the RELAP/PARCS modifications of control rod and boron content were performed by the Nuclear Engineering Group belonging to the Institute for Industrial, Radiophysical and Environmental Safety (ISIRYM) at the Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV). 
        - The modifications to the RELAP5 full plant model to couple the 3-D PARCS core, the steady-state adjustments of PDDs, and the transient calculation and analysis were performed by the Thermo-Hydraulic group of Almaraz-Trillo NPPs.

The results of the transient show an almost perfect agreement with plant data for all the compared variables. The comparison of in-core parameters evolution with plant data is also very good and the 3-D simulation allows to perform a more detailed analysis of core behaviour.

This report was prepared by the Thermo-Hydraulic group of Almaraz-Trillo NPPs (CNAT), with the help of the Polytechnic University of Valencia.

The Asociación Española de la Industria Eléctrica (UNESA, Electric Industry Association of Spain) and Almaraz-Trillo NPPs AIE sponsored this work.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit
32.2 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Finn,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  Date:
May 15, 2007By:
/s/ Thomas M. FinnName:
Thomas M. FinnTitle:
Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer 20