alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.
| Dated: April 19, 2007 | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                     |   |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Levy Gerzberg                         |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff Proposes $55,000 Fine Against U.S. Enrichment Corporation for Violation at Portsmouth Plant

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-44

July 16, 1998

**NRC STAFF PROPOSES $55,000 FINE AGAINST U.S. ENRICHMENT CORPORATIONFOR VIOLATION AT PORTSMOUTH PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $55,000 fine against the U.S. Enrichment Corporation (USEC) for an inadequate maintenance and testing program for safety-related valves at its Portsmouth, Ohio, gaseous diffusion plant.

The Portsmouth facility processes uranium for use in fuel for commercial nuclear power plants.

In April, NRC inspectors, during an inspection of the plant's autoclave system, questioned the lack of testing for autoclave containment isolation valves, which are operated by compressed air. Inspectors noted that these valves were not routinely tested for conditions resulting from low pressure within the plant's compressed air system.

The autoclave is similar to a large oven where a cylinder containing solid uranium hexafluoride (UF6) is heated to convert it to a gas. The plant's autoclaves have high pressure containment system valves which are opened by compressed air and closed either by use of compressed air or by a spring. During certain accident conditions, these valves prevent the release of UF6 to the environment by closing the lines used during normal operations. The air-operated valves normally use the plant's compressed air system. But they also have air reserve tanks to close the valves in the event of a loss of normal plant air pressure.

As a result of the NRC inspectors' concern, the plant staff initially tested 25 containment valves, seven of which failed to meet the test criteria for closing.

In a letter to the corporation, NRC Acting Regional Administrator Carl J. Paperiello said there was no actual safety consequence in this event. The autoclave containment isolation systems typically have a back-up spring-operated valve available, which would have closed if a loss of air pressure occurred.

He told the corporation, however, that the violation "is a significant safety concern" because of an increased potential for a release of UF6 if there were both a loss of plant air and a catastrophic rupture of a UF6 cylinder.

He added that the root cause of the violation indicated a "lack of fundamental understanding of the importance of demonstrating that safety system components will perform their intended safety functions over the full range of operating conditions."

The corporation has implemented numerous corrective actions, including an operability evaluation of the valves and the establishment of testing and repair criteria.

USEC has until August 13 to pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the corporation may request a hearing.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Travelzoo Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-121076 and 333-119700) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-116093) of Travelzoo Inc. of our report dated
January 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Travelzoo Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Travelzoo Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Mountain View, California
March 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-6310 ANTHONY D. HAWKS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-94-206-S, CA-97-61-S) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Anthony D. Hawks, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Anthony D. Hawks appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. Finding no reversible error, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss. Hawks contends on appeal that the district court improperly denied his motion to amend his § 2255 motion. We disagree. Our review of the record discloses that although the court denied this motion, it treated it as a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 or Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. As such, the court reviewed all claims contained therein and properly found none to survive summary dismissal under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Pro ceedings. We agree with the district court's conclusion. Hawks also asserts that his federal trial, following an alleged acquittal of the charges in state court, violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. Hawks did not raise this argument below and therefore maynot assert it for the first time on appeal absent plain error or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). B ecause successive charges of this type are permitted under the dual sovereignty doctrine, Hawks fails to demonstrate either of these prerequisites. See Abbate v. United States , 359 U.S. 187 (1959). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. We also deny Hawks' motion to proceed informa pauperis and his motion to amend and supplement his pleadings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1592 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1592

 To remove penalties for health insurers under the Patient Protection 
 and Affordable Care Act and Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2017

   Mr. Yoho introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove penalties for health insurers under the Patient Protection 
 and Affordable Care Act and Health Care and Education Reconciliation 
                              Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Holding Health Insurers Harmless 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR FOR PRIVATE SECTOR HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDERS FROM 
              ACA PENALTIES.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), no health insurance 
issuer offering health insurance coverage nor sponsor of a group health 
plan shall be penalized, fined, or otherwise punished by any agency or 
instrumentality of the United States Government for a failure of such 
coverage or plan to comply with any of the applicable requirements 
under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (including under the 
amendments made by such Acts).
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the 
requirements under section 2704 and section 2714 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-3 and 300gg-14), including the regulations 
promulgated pursuant to such sections.
    (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            (1) The term ``agency or instrumentality'' means any 
        department or independent agency of the United States 
        Government that is tasked with enforcing applicable 
        requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
        and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
            (2) The terms ``health insurance issuer offering health 
        insurance coverage'' and ``sponsor of a group health plan'' 
        shall be construed as consistent with use of such terms for 
        purposes of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and 
        shall include any sole proprietorship, partnership, for-profit 
        corporation, nonprofit corporation, or any other 
        nongovernmental entity that engages in the sale or distribution 
        of health insurance products.
                                 <all>
```
### -82 -80 -78 -76

38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
No. 82-5855.

#### Walker *v.*Kentucky.

Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Forward Area Refueling Point Tryouts Test Airmen for Special Operations

By Staff Sgt. Peter Reft18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Jim EDGAR, Secretary of State of Illinois, petitioner, v. McVEY TRUCKING CO.

No. 86-1847.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 13, 1987.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Denied.
Converted by EDGARwiz


FINANCIAL   AGREEMENT




This Financial Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made by and between China Venture I Incorporation (the “INC”) and Andrew Chien, collectively the “Parties”, on January 15, 2011.




Whereas the “INC” is a Nevada registered stock incorporation, a blank check company with the purpose as a vehicle for business combination, and Andrew Chien who is the owner of “INC”.




Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:




Andrew Chien agrees to personally pay for expenses incurred by the “INC” for business combination. The financing is no amount and time limitation until the amendment or another agreement being reached between parties. 




Agreed to and accepted as of January 15, 2011 by:







China Venture I Inc.                            Individual









       /s/ Andrew Chien                          /s/ Andrew Chien
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of Han Logistics, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Amee Lombardi, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:April 15, 2010By:/s/Amee LombardiAmee Lombardi, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27226]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 728 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-410, K2025-408.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27226 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
U.S. Department of Transportation July 22, 2015

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Griffin Aerial, LLC

Section 333 Petition to Operate Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Addendum: Adding an additional airframe

Prepared by:

Reed Frick

CEO Griffin Aerial, LLC

182 W Rock Ave

New Haven, CT 06515

978-994-5448

reed.frick@gmail.com
Addendum: Adding an additional airframe

The Petitioner would like to add another airframe and has supplied the following additional 

information:

3D Robotics Solo Operation Manual and Flight Checklist

Additional Unmanned Aircraft Systems requested to operate under this request:

3D Robotics Solo

The petitioner states that the unmanned aircraft (UA) to be operated under this request are less

than 55 lbs. fully loaded, fly at a speed of no more than 50 knots, carry neither a pilot nor

passenger, carry no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operate exclusively within 

a secured area as set out in the POHs. 

The Solo is a four-rotor manufactured by 3D Robotics. The VTOL quadrotor-type design has four 

motors, GPS, full autonomous autopilot capabilities, telemetry and manual ground control. In 

addition, the craft has integrated safety features built into the design of the UAS, as described in 

the Operation Manual, to ensure the safety of persons and property within and surrounding the 

limited operating area. The petitioner further describes that, in the event the UAS loses 

communications or its GPS signal, the UA will have the capability to return to a pre-determined 

location within the Security Perimeter and land. It will also have the capability to abort a flight in 

the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

This	airframe	was	released	to	the market	after	the	initial	Petition	was	filed	and	the	

Petitioner,	Griffin	Aerial	LLC,	wishes	to	include	the	airframe	as	part	of	the	original	request.

Reed	Frick

CEO	Griffin	Aerial,	LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
         Registrant's unaudited interim Financial Statements
         included in the Registrant's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
         period ended March 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
         reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         11,352
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                   81
<INVENTORY>                                    750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,117
<PP&E>                                         2,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,545
<BONDS>                                        115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,727
<SALES>                                        15,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,296
<CGS>                                          13,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                961
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (32)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            993
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   993
<EPS-PRIMARY><F1>                              0.28<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.28<F2>
        

<FN>
<F1>  The word "Primary" should be deleted and replaced with the word "Basic".

<F2>  This amount was restated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
      Board Statement No. 128 and Staff Accounting Bulleting No. 98.
</FN>

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff Identifies Nuclear Power Plants Warranting Increased Regulatory Attention

----

----

No. 97-095

June 25, 1997

**NRC STAFF IDENTIFIES NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS WARRANTING INCREASED REGULATORY ATTENTION**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff advised the Commission today that it has identified 13 nuclear power plants that warrant increased NRC regulatory attention.

No additional plants were added to the NRC watch list; one plant - Indian Point 3, operated by the New York Power Authority near Buchanan, New York - was removed after correcting problems and demonstrating improved performance. The plant was first placed on the NRC watch list in June 1993. NRC staff will continue to monitor the plant's performance to ensure improvements are sustained.

Thirteen plants remain on the NRC watch list. They were identified earlier this month at a meeting during which senior NRC managers conducted their semi-annual review of the performance of operating nuclear power plants and fuel cycle facilities.

The plants are:

Crystal River Unit 3, operated by Florida Power Corp. near Crystal River, Florida (listed in January).

Dresden Units 2 and 3, operated by Commonwealth Edison Co. near Morris, Illinois (first listed in June 1987, removed in December 1988, and added again in January 1992);

LaSalle Units 1 and 2, operated by Commonwealth Edison near Ottawa, Illinois (listed in January);

Maine Yankee, operated by Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co., near Bath, Maine (listed in January);

Millstone Units 1, 2 and 3, operated by Northeast Utilities Service Co. at Waterford, Connecticut (listed in January 1996);

Salem Units 1 and 2, operated by Public Service Electric and Gas Co. near Salem, New Jersey (listed in January); and

Zion Units 1 and 2, operated by Commonwealth Edison 40 miles north of Chicago (first listed in January 1991, removed in January 1993 and relisted in January).

 EDITORS: Texts of letters to utilities with plants on the watch list or which have been removed from the list, will be available on the NRC's Internet home page.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021