alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony D. Squeglia,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                            |  |                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    Anthony D. Squeglia
|               |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Anthony D. Squeglia                                                 
|               |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
No. 91-6146.

#### Shumate *v.*Signet Bank.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**ORDER**

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22

- 0 573 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. VALERIE SUE DOGTAKINGGUN GRANT ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

o f time to and including October 2 3 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve h er opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0573
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of  LONE MOUNTAIN GOLD CORP.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Kevin
Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: April
16, 2008
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:26:46

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Surry 2 Docket (050- 00281)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 144 - Audit / self-assessment / effectiveness review LTA S - Specialized task force W - Assessment 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA S - Specialized task force W - Assessment 147 - Individual corrective action LTA G - Engineering G - Design 147 - Individual corrective action LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 148 - Action not yet started or untimely S - Specialized task force W - Assessment 

835

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Training / IR102 - Individual knowledge LTA G - Engineering G - Design 102 - Individual knowledge LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

29

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements S - Specialized task force W - Assessment 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making D - Emergency Drill 

D - Emergency Planning

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:26:46

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Surry 2 Docket (050- 00281)

Work Planning & Practices / IR194 - Housekeeping LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

1252

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 23
#### City of Fond du Lac, Respondent, vs. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, Appellant.

*February 25*

March *17, 1914.*

*Appeal: Prior decisions adhered to: Municipal corporations: Illegal contract: Jiidgment, upon, whom, binding: Recovery of money paid on void Contract: Laches.*

1. Prior decisions of this court to tbe effect that defendant’s paving contract with the plaintiff city was vitiated by fraud, and that the judgment in an action -to restrain the city from making such contract was binding on defendant, which appeared in such action by counsel, are adhered to upon prac- • ticaliy the same record.

2. The fact that an action by a city to recover money paid by it on an illegal contract was not brought until more than two years after the payment did not necessarily show laches precluding a recovery, it not appearing that the delay operated in any way to defendant’s disadvantage.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eond du Lac county: Cuestes A. Eowlee., Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action to recover money paid hy the city for a pavement under a void and fraudulent contract. Eurther facts appear in *McMillan v. Fond du Lac,*139 Wis. 367, 120 N. W. 240, and in *McMillan v. Barber A. P. Go.*151 Wis. 48, 138 N. W. 94. ■ The trial court held the plaintiff was entitled to recover, and from a judgment entered accordingly the defendant appealed.

*Frank M. Hoyt,*for the appellant.

Eor the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *L. F. Lurvey,*city attorney, and *H. F. 8wett,*of counsel.

Vin.te, J.

Defendant again argues the absence of fraud in its contract with the city, though this court has twice held to the contrary. *McMillan v. Fond du Lac,*139 Wis. 367, 120 N. W. 240, and *McMillan v. Barber A. P. Co.*151 Wis. 48, 138 N. W. 94. That the hardship imposed upon it hy *472the ruling in tbe latter case was necessitated by its own conduct was clearly shown by the opinion of the court therein, and the grounds therefor need not be restated. The way of transgressors is still hard.

It is also urged that the defendant is not concluded by the judgment in the case of *McMillan v. Fond du*Lac, 139 Wis. 367, 120 N. W. 240, because, while it appeared by counsel in that case, it did not have control of the litigation. The same contention was made in *McMillan v. Barber A. P. Co.*151 Wis. 48, 138 N. W. 94, upon practically the same record, and was disposed of adversely to the defendant. We are satisfied the ruling was correct.

Plaintiff paid the money sought to be recovered in January, 1909, and this action was begun in March, 1911. It is claimed the city has been guilty of such laches as to preclude a recovery. It does not appear that the delay has in any way operated to the disadvantage of the defendant. So, irrespective of the correctness of the claim of the plaintiff that it' required about two years to elect officials who would prosecute the action, it cannot be held that the trial court erred in finding there was no laches.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Staff Proposes $88,000 Fine Against Northeast Nuclear for Discriminatory Action Against Two Employees at Millstone

----

----

I-99-18 March 9, 1999

 

**NRC STAFF PROPOSES $88,000 FINE AGAINST NORTHEAST NUCLEAR FOR DISCRIMINATORY ACTION AGAINST 2 EMPLOYEES AT MILLSTONE**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed an $88,000 fine against Northeast Nuclear Energy Company for discriminating against two contract employees in 1997 at Millstone Station in Waterford, Conn.

Investigations by the NRC, the utility and a third-party organization (Little Harbor Consultants) all concluded that both workers lost their jobs after raising concerns about the adequacy of the plant's motor-operated valve program manual.

NRC has further confirmed that the firings were recommended by the employees' supervisor and supported by the manager of the motor-operated valve department in which the employees and the supervisory officials then worked. Both the supervisor and manager also were contractor employees.

Furthermore, NRC investigators found, the recommendation for dismissal was neither questioned nor objected to by the plant recovery officer involved with management oversight of the MOV program activities. Neither was the action questioned by the contracts or legal departments, which reviewed it.

As the result of its own investigation and one by Little Harbor Consultants -- which monitored Millstone's safety conscious work environment -- the company rescinded the terminations and offered to reinstate the two individuals. 

In a letter to the company, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said the NRC recognizes that Northeast took appropriate actions to ensure that a work environment exists at Millstone in which employees feel free to raise concerns. But, he said these dismissals "resulted in a significant violation of the employee protection standards" of NRC because of the involvement of officials above the level of first-line supervisor. As a result, NRC characterized the violations as a Severity Level II problem, the second highest in the agency's enforcement policy.

Although the company identified the violation and took corrective actions, Mr. Miller said a civil penalty is warranted given that: 1) the then recovery officer and legal and contracts departments failed to question the termination recommendation; 2) senior managers failed to identify and correct the management problems in the motor-operated valve department in sufficient time to prevent the terminations and were slow to recognize and respond to the indications of retaliation; 3) management failed to train its contractor supervisors in the NRC's employee protection regulation, despite the Commission's October 1996 order calling for a safety conscious work environment; and, 4) the past history of violations involving discrimination at Millstone Station. The NRC issued three civil penalties for such violations between 1993 and 1996.

Northeast has 30 days to respond to the enforcement action.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No. 82-5904.

#### McFadden *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Warren County. Certiorari denied.
Order filed September 28, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00348-CV

____________

GILCHRIST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Appellant

V.

COUNTY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0076026

O R D E R

Our review has determined that relevant items have been omitted from the 

clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain an Order 

signed July 21, 2017 and Agreed Final Judgment signed August 21, 2017.

The Galveston County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

on or before October 13, 2017, containing an Order signed July 21, 2017 and Agreed 

Final Judgment signed August 21, 2017.
If the omitted items are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

items are not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/24/2014 17:58:54

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Oconee 2 Docket (050- 00270)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

113

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

338

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 183 - Pre-job activities LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - M - Mechanical Maintenance / Repair 

450

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
     FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS 
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
              
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,662,962
<SECURITIES>                                     2,090,871
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,566,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0                                   
<INVENTORY>                                     47,449,071 <F1> 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   880,473
<PP&E>                                             105,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (105,038)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,649,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              660,822    
<BONDS>                                         42,396,219 <F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0                   
<COMMON>                                            42,918
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,549,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,649,843 
<SALES>                                          4,855,022 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,775,333
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0                                  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,552,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,254,687
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,040,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,072,481) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       525,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,546,770)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (2.49) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 

<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES PURCHASED LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES.
<F2> REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process

On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by grave acts of violence committed by foreign terrorists that disrupt the Middle East peace process. On August 20, 1998, by Executive Order 13099, the President modified the Annex to Executive Order 12947 to identify four additional persons who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process. On February 16, 2005, by Executive Order 13372, the President clarified the steps taken in Executive Order 12947.

These terrorist activities continue to threaten the Middle East peace process and to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on January 23, 1995, and the measures adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond January 23, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2015-01283

Billing code 3295-F5
No. 90-6319.

#### Bright *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### GLEN CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. O. C. ASSOCIATES, et al.

No. 82-106.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 4, 1982.

The motion of Continental Mortgage Investors, Debtor, for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean Warren, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1002]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Cicoria, J. — Attempted Assault, *8732nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# EPR Medium Break LOCA Benchmarking Exercise Using RELAP5 and CATHARE (NUREG/IA-0459)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0459 (PDF - 1.64 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2015**Date Published:** December 2015

**Prepared by:** Sebastian Gurgacz, Michał Pawluczyk, Piotr Mazgaj, Piotr Darnowski, Kacper Samul, Maciej Skrzypek

Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Heat Engineering, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Thermal-hydraulic analyses are a key part in support of regulatory work for new and existing nuclear power plant design and operation. This paper describes the approach to model the Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) in a Light Water Reactor as part of the "Safety Analysis Report in Warsaw University of Technology" (SARWUT) project and the framework of the "Familiarization with the calculation codes application" program.

The RELAP5 model of the European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) has been developed on the basis of an available CATHARE-2 input. Both thermal-hydraulic codes, RELAP5 and CATHARE-2, are used for the safety analysis of the NPP. The purpose of this report is to present the intermediate (6-inch) cold leg break calculations performed within the benchmark exercise using both RELAP5 and CATHARE-2 codes.

The results received are satisfactory, however as presented, the calculations performed with the use of both computer codes, at the early-stage give low cladding temperature but differ in the transient characteristics. The discrepancies in the values of chosen safety related parameters are analyzed in detail for understanding and future work.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyers transit Taiwan Strait

By 7th Fleet Public Affairs7th Fleet

                Taiwan Strait   –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More  News