alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

NIOSH gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from the Westinghouse Electric Corp. in Bloomfield, New Jersey, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Westinghouse Electric Corp.                    

*Location:*                         Bloomfield, New Jersey.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees who worked in any plant production area.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1950 through March 1, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2015-01056 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1406 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the slaughter of dogs and 

cats for human consumption. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. TROTT, and Mr. BRENDAN

F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the slaughter 

of dogs and cats for human consumption. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dog and Cat Meat 

5 Trade Prohibition Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SLAUGHTER OF DOGS AND CATS 

7 FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. 

8 The Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1406 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 30. PROHIBITION OF SLAUGHTER OF DOGS AND CATS 

2 FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. 

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No person may— 

4 ‘‘(1) knowingly slaughter a dog or cat for 

5 human consumption; or 

6 ‘‘(2) knowingly ship, transport, move, deliver, 

7 receive, possess, purchase, sell, or donate— 

8 ‘‘(A) a dog or cat to be slaughtered for 

9 human consumption; or 

10 ‘‘(B) dog or cat parts for human consump11 tion. 

12 ‘‘(b) PENALTY.—Any person who violates this section 

13 shall be subject to imprisonment for not more than 1 year, 

14 or a fine of not more than $2,500, or both. 

15 ‘‘(c) SCOPE.—Subsection (a) shall apply only with re16 spect to conduct in or affecting interstate or foreign com17 merce or within the special maritime and territorial juris18 diction of the United States. 

19 ‘‘(d) CONFLICT WITH STATE LAW.—This section 

20 shall not be construed to limit any State or local law or 

21 regulations protecting the welfare of animals or to prevent 

22 a State or local governing body from adopting and enforc23 ing animal welfare laws and regulations that are more 

24 stringent than this section.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-41309 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE LUIS RICO-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-883-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public D e fender appointed to represent Jose Luis Rico-Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rico-Rivera has not f i l e d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the app e al p r e s e n t s n o n o nf rivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-41309 Document: 00511640606 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-41309

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-41309 Document: 00511640606 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Felix-Simao Kiloso 

6942 Hazeltine Avenue, Apt. 7 

Van Nuys, CA 91405 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

May 13,2015 

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

Air travel is already too expensive, and for no discernible reason. I travel between the United States, 

Africa, and Europe on a regular basis for business, and the cost of flights can sometimes be 

overwhelming. If the Open Skies agreements that the United States entered into with foreign nations are 

modified to disallow international airlines from competing in the free market, travelers can expect prices 

to go up and service to go down even further. 

In the 1980's, there was an airline called People Express that offered flights from Los Angeles to Brussels 

for $200. They proved to be too competitive in price, and the big airlines broke People Express until it 

had to go out of business. Now, the same flight costs $1,500. In comparison, a flight from Brussels to 

Kinshasa in the Congo costs only $300. If the United States airline industry convinces the federal 

government to alter Open Skies to solely favor its own economic interests, ticket prices could rise so high 

that they may preclude many people from engaging in international business. 

Anybody who flies internationally on a frequent basis already knows that flights can be uncomfortable 

because airlines pack as many people into a plane as they can. The service is often discourteous, as well. 

By preventing competition between carriers, and by freezing foreign airlines out of the market altogether, 

a change in the Open Skies agreements will allow a few American carriers to control the skies and 

international flights. The agreements work, and the government should not intervene in air travel on a few 

companies' behalf. 

s 10-150519-024 
Felix-Simao Kiloso 

6942 Hazeltine Avenue, Apt 7 

Van Nuys, CA 91405 

s 10-150519-024 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

ATTN: Docket Center 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

20S9C: '1111 J I JJ 1

1111 )11~1/i ~1 ulll'1'' /J 111J I',J 1 ill'''''' 1'' 111'' 1 i~ii
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC to Meet with Fansteel Inc. on Reprocessing Residual Material at Muskogee Plant

----

----

RIV: 99-22 May 25, 1999

 

**NRC TO MEET WITH FANSTEEL INC. ON REPROCESSING RESIDUAL MATERIAL AT MUSKOGEE PLANT**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Fansteel, Inc. Thursday, May 27 to discuss the company's readiness to begin reprocessing residual material at its site in Muskogee, Oklahoma.

The meeting will be held at Fansteel offices located at Number Ten Tantalum Place, Muskogee, at 4:30 p.m., and will be open for public observation. NRC officials will be available afterward to talk with reporters or members of the public.

Fansteel plans to extract radioactive materials and rare earth metals from residue left over from prior operations at the Muskogee site. The company was previously authorized to process ore and extract rare earth metals including tantalum, niobium and scandium, which are used in industrial products such as semiconductors. The new process to be applied to the residue requires the use of hazardous chemicals. The NRC is responsible for approving Fansteel's plans and monitoring the process for radiation safety.

Representatives of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, the U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Muskogee County, and the City of Muskogee have been invited to attend.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No. 82-5687.

#### Linam *v.*Griffin, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
PMN Sanitized file Process Diagram Itaconix XDP
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of PWR Steam Generator Modelling in RELAP5/MOD2 (NUREG/IA-0106, TEC/L/0471/R91)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Summary

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0106 (PDF 6.62 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** June 1993

**Prepared by:** J. M. Putney, R. J. Preece

National Power Technology and Environmental Centre Kelvin Avenue Leatherhead Surrey, KT22 7SE United Kingdom

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Summary

An assessment of Steam Generator (SG) modelling in the PWR thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD2 is presented. The assessment is based on a review of code assessment calculations performed in the UK and elsewhere, detailed calculations against a series of commissioning tests carried out on the Wolf Creek PWR and analytical investigations of the phenomena involved in normal and abnormal SG operation. A number of modelling deficiencies are identified and their implications for PWR safety analysis are discussed - including methods for compensating for the deficiencies through changes to the input deck. Consideration is also given as to whether the deficiencies will still be present in the successor code RELAP5/MOD3.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Opinion issued May 22, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 3
- 0 734
- CV

——————————— JERRELL SCOTT , Appellant

V. DAVID ELMERS , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1032832

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Jerrell Scott , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1; see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court2

and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2 007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 , 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings , Higley, and Sharp

.
No: III-19-002 February 7, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Byron Nuclear Power Plant

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Diana BetancourtRoldán as the new senior resident inspector at the Byron nuclear power plant. The 

two-unit plant is located in Byron, Ill., 17 miles southwest of Rockford. 

Betancourt-Roldán joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in Region III in 

2006. She has served as a resident inspector at the Braidwood nuclear power plant 

and as an acting senior resident inspector at the Point Beach nuclear power plant. 

She earned a bachelor’s of chemical engineering degree from the University of 

Puerto Rico and also holds a master’s of mechanical engineering degree from the 

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 

Each commercial nuclear power plant site in the United States has at least two resident 

inspectors who monitor day-to-day operations. Betancourt-Roldán joins NRC resident inspector 

Christopher Hunt at the Byron facility. They will serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, 

conducting inspections and monitoring significant work projects.

The NRC resident inspectors can be reached at (630) 829-9507.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1496 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1496

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4040 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                      ``Marvin Gaye Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2017

 Ms. Bass (for herself, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Lee, Ms. Plaskett, Mrs. 
 Napolitano, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Moore, 
   Mr. Evans, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Costa, Ms. 
 Brownley of California, Mr. Takano, and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4040 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                      ``Marvin Gaye Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARVIN GAYE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4040 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Marvin Gaye Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marvin 
Gaye Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Schneider, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   August 11, 2008 | /s/ Karl  Schneider                 |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                               | Karl Schneider                      |
|                               | Senior Vice  President, Finance and |
|                               | Chief Financial  Officer            |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Kallassy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesvExchange of 1934, amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thevfinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
February 14, 2011By:
/s/ John A. KallassyTitle:
Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

%I c’ Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 COPY FOR YOUR

I FORMATION

NOV 13 George Aburn, Jr., Director

Air and Radiation Management Administration

Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Mr. Abum:

This letter is in.reference to two StateImplernentation Plan (SIP) revisions that

the State of Maryland submitted to the EnvirOnmentalProtection Agency (EPA) on June4, 2007. The SIP revisions are entitled (1) “Baltimore Nonattainment Area 8-Hour

Ozone State Implementation Plan and Base Year Inventory (SIP # 07-04)” and (2) “Cecil

County, Maryland 8Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan and Base Year Inventory (SIP #07-05).” These SIP revision submittals are dated June 15,2007.

The June 4, 2007 sübrnittals consist of SIP revisions addressing four elements

required by Sections 172(c) and 182 ofthe Clean Air Act as implemented by Subpart X

of 40 CFR part 51 fór moderate and above 8-hour ozOne nonattainment areas. Theseelements are (1) the 2002 base year emissions inventory, (2). the 15 percent reasonable

further progress plan (RFP plan), (3) the attainment demonstration, and (4) contingency

measures. .

. .

EPA requests that by. December 5,2008, Maryland identify which sections ofits

SIP subrñittals address the RFP plan and related elements, including the2002 base year

• emissions inventory. We ask that you identify each component of each ofthese four

elements by its associated sectiOns, subsections, or if warranted, paragraph of the relevantsubrnittal,.including any related appendices.or relevant.cbiments/responses. We are

•requestingthât you provideus this very specific inforrñatioii sothat we can propose

rulemaking on any elements ofthese submittäls that we may determine to be severable

from the attainment demonstrations themselves.

Should you have any questions regarding this request, please do not

hesitate to contact me, or have your staff person contact Maria Pino of my staff at

(2 5)8 14-2 18 1.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2007

January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September  • October • November • December

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021