alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, asadopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 7, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by HASCO Medical, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Mark B. Lucky Name: Mark B. Lucky Title: Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer  Dated:  March 30, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Gregory R. Moxley, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extended StayAmerica, Inc. (the “Company”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.

 
| November 12, 2003                            |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/  GREGORY R. MOXLEY                       |   |
| Gregory R. Moxley                                 |
| Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# A Day in the Life of an NRC Resident Inspector (NUREG/BR-0512)

On this page:
        - Publication Information

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0512 (PDF - 6.43 MB)
        - NUREG/BR-0512 - Supplement 1 (PDF - 4.28 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published: **
Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Cofrentes NPP (BWR/6) ATWS (MSIVC) Analysis with TRAC-BF1: 1D vs. Point Kinetics and Containment Response (NUREG/IA-0178)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0178 (PDF 1.50 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** A. Escrivá, M.D. Bovea, G. Verdú, J. L. Muñoz Cobo, UPV, F. Castrillo, ID

Universidad Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) Departmento de Ingenieria Quimica y Nuclear Camino de Vera 14 46021 VALENCIA SPAIN

IBRDROLA (ID) Hermosilla, 3 28001 MADRID SPAIN

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) are considered as events which might produce a severe accident in a boiling water reactor (BWR). It has been selected the most unfavourable of the different scenarios that could lead to an ATWS accident: an inadvertent closure of the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs).

To mitigate this accident, a borated water solution is injected. This action is an alternative way to shutdown the reactor quickly and effectively. This event has been analyzed using the TRAC-BF1 computer program.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Staff to Meet with Commonwealth Edison Officials to Discuss Performance at Dresden Nuclear Power Plant

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-37 June 8, 1999

 

**NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH COMMONWEALTH EDISON OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Tuesday, June 15, with Commonwealth Edison Company officials to discuss the recent Plant Performance Review of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station. The plant is located Morris, Illinois.

The meeting will be at 1:30 p.m. (CDT) in the Training Building at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, 6500 N. Dresden Road, Morris. (Dresden Road intersects Pine Bluff/Lorenzo Road east of Morris.) The meeting is open to public observation. NRC officials will be available after the meeting for questions and comments from members of the public and the news media.

[The Plant Plant Performance Review assessment of Dresden was previously covered in News Announcement RIII-99-17, issued on April 1.]

In a March 26 letter to Commonwealth Edison, which operates the plant, Geoffrey Grant, Division Director in the NRC's Region III Office, said, "Overall, performance at Dresden was acceptable."

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region III Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site. The review covered the time period from April 1998 through January 31.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is using to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months. A new inspection and assessment program is being developed for use next year.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-01-2015]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Diane Finver at                         *Diane.Finver@trade.gov*                         (202) 482-1367.                    

Dated: January 16, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-01337 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50807 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. PAULINA ESCARSEGA-DIAZ, also known as Paulina Leonor Escarcega-Diaz Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2110-ALL Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Paulina Escarsega-Diaz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50807

2 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Houston, Also Known as Tyrone Black, Appellant.

*674[631 NYS2d 406]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered June 16, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the hearing court’s determination that the complainant had an independent source for her in-court identification *(see, United States v Crews,*445 US 463; *People v Pleasant,*54 NY2d 972, *cert denied*455 US 924; *People v Brnja,*50 NY2d 366, 369, n 1; *People v Hyatt,*162 AD2d 713). Additionally, the complainant’s testimony at trial regarding her negative identification of another individual did not improperly bolster her identification of the defendant *(see, People v Bolden,*58 NY2d 741; *People v Jones,*200 AD2d 764; *People v Rodriguez,*193 AD2d 633).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 91-663.

#### Clark *v.*Clark, Executor of the Estate of Clark.

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.
No: 19-054 October 28, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement

for Turkey Point Subsequent License Renewal

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued the agency’s Final Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement regarding the Florida Power & Light application to operate the 

Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 3 and 4 for an additional 20 years. The units are

located approximately 20 miles south of Miami.

The EIS documents the NRC staff’s evaluation and conclusion that the environmental impacts 

of renewing the Turkey Point licenses are so limited that preserving the renewal option for energyplanning decisionmakers would not be unreasonable.

The final statement was developed in cooperation with the U.S. National Park Service, 

Southeast Region, and is available on the NRC website.

FPL submitted the Turkey Point subsequent license renewal application on Jan. 30, 2018. The 

subsequent license renewal process determines whether an operating reactors’ license can be extended

for an additional 20 years of operation (from 60 to 80 years). The application, less proprietary details, 

is available on the NRC website. In addition, the following libraries maintain a copy of the 

application’s final SEIS for public inspection: Homestead Branch Library at 700 N. Homestead Blvd.,

in Homestead; Naranja Branch Library at 14850 SW 280th St., in Homestead; South Dade Regional 

Library at 10750 SW 211th St., in Miami; and Miami-Dade Main Library at 101 W. Flagler St., in 

Miami.

The NRC held meetings in Homestead in May 2018 to collect comments from the surrounding 

community regarding issues to include in the environmental review, with additional meetings held in 

Homestead in March 2019. The final statement includes the staff’s consideration of comments 

submitted during the review from the public and federal, state, local and tribal agencies.

The NRC’s final decision on the Turkey Point subsequent license renewal application will 

also take into account the staff’s July 2019 final Safety Evaluation Report regarding the application. 

The NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has also concluded there is no basis to hold a hearing 

on the renewal application; the Board’s decision can be appealed to the full Commission.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 11, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robin Owsley at 1-888-912-1227 or (317) 685-7627.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Wednesday, February 11, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Robin Owsley. For more information please contact: Robin Owsley at 1-888-912-1227 or (317) 685-7627or write: TAP Office, 575 N. Pennsylvania, Indianapolis, IN 46204 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to the Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

Dated: January 21, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-01480 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>






                                                                     EXHIBIT 15




May 13, 2003


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:       Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

     1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290 and Registration No. 333-83007)
1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted
to Certain Directors and Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

     2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907 and Registration No. 333-55470)
1998 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 15, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three month period ended March 29, 2003 and included in the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to above.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



                                       36
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

ZORAN CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:   May 14, 2004 |                                   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Levy  Gerzberg                     |   |
|                       | Levy  Gerzberg                         |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7615

MARVIN LOVEJOY, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-03-3553-8-24BI) Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin Lovejoy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Marvin Lovejoy, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lovejoy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Lovejoy’s motions to amend judgment and to set aside his sentence and conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED