alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Use of Computerized Microtomography to Examine the Relationships of Sorption Sites in Alluvial Soils to Iron and Pore Space Distributions (NUREG/CR-6784)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6784 (PDF - 1.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 2002**Date Published:**July 2002

**Prepared by:** A.A. McLain1, SJ. Altman1, M.L.Rivers2, and R.T. Cygan3

1Geohydrology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0735 2CARS, University of Chicago, 5640 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 3Geochemistry Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0750

Sandia National Laboratories  Albuquerque, NM 87185-0750

E. O'Donnell, NRC Technical Monitor

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness  Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6811

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents results from computerized microtomographic (CMT) imaging of soils from Naturita, Colorado, a Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) site. The objective is to better understand the mineralogical and morphological controls of the sorption of uranium in the sediment. The samples were prepared and imaged with three goals in mind: 1) to visualize iron-rich mineral distribution in fine-grained materials (<355 μm grain size) and aggregate grains, 2) to visualize pore space in the aggregates, and 3) to visualize cesium sorption sites as a proxy for uranium. Two sets of images were obtained with voxel sizes of 6.7 μm and 3.3 μm on a side, respectively. Bright rims with a thickness of 4 to 15 μm were observed on fine-grained materials and aggregate grains. Porous, iron-rich interstitial material was also observed within the aggregates. It is speculated that these interstitial materials are clay minerals closely associated with some iron oxyhydroxide phases or iron oxyhydroxides that are porous at the sub-micron scale. However, to verify this identification, the CMT data needs to be post-processed using calibration materials to minimize noise and error. A subtraction technique using images obtained just above and below the X-ray absorption edges of iodine and cesium successfully illustrates the pore space distribution in the KI-saturated samples and sorption sites in CsCl-treated samples. The cesium sorption sites appear to be associated with accessible pore space observed in the untreated and KI-saturated samples. The cesium sorption sites are also associated with iron-rich areas both as exterior coatings and in the interstitial areas of the aggregate grains.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         564,594
<SECURITIES>                                 8,418,573
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,890,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    552,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,773,284
<PP&E>                                      10,671,556
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,117,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,351,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,973,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,472
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,413,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,351,375
<SALES>                                      2,363,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,819,120
<CGS>                                        1,428,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,284,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                643,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            643,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   643,141
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# Haddam Neck Meeting January 15, 1997

----

----

I-97-1

January 8, 1996 

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public on Wednesday evening, January 15, to discuss the decommissioning of the Haddam Neck nuclear power plant. The meeting, which begins at 7 p.m., will be held in the Haddam Killingworth High School cafeteria. It will be chaired by Marjorie DeBold, First Selectman of the Town of Haddam.

The agenda includes a presentation by the licensee, Northeast Utilities, describing its plans to decommission the plant, followed by an NRC presentation on decommissioning regulations and future plant oversight. The public will have an opportunity to question both the licensee and the NRC staff.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00462

- CV
Joshua Chubasco LIRA , Appellant

v. Evangeline S. SAMUDIO , Appellee
From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 07757 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 2, 2015
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant Joshua Chubasco Lira filed a notice of appeal on July 24, 2015. He was required to pay $1 9 5.00 in filing fee s to this court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. 1 Appellant did not timely pay the required fee s . Accordingl y, when the fee s remained unpaid, on August 14, 2015, this court
ordered A ppellant to provide written proof to this court not later than August 24, 2015, that the

1 See also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 51.207(b)(1) (filing fee $100.00) (West Supp. 2015); id. §§ 51.0051 , .208 (additional fee $50.00); id. § 51. 851(b) (electronic filing fee $20.00); id. § 51.941(a) (services for indigents fee $25.00) ; Texas Supreme Cour t Order Regarding Fees Charged i n Civil Cases in t he Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

– 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) , reprinted in T EX

. R. A PP

. P. app. A § B.l.(a).04

- 15

- 00462

- CV

- 2

- filing fees ha ve been paid

. See id. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond as ord ered, the appeal could be dismissed. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C. , No. 04

- 05

- 00532

- CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). To date, Appellant has not paid the fees or filed any response with this court

. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shant S. Hovnanian,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  Date:

May 15, 2008By:

/s/ Shant S. HovnanianName:

Shant S. HovnanianTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
  Officer 21
Exhibit 10.6
                                                                    ------------


           Amendment No. 1 to MR3 Systems Metals Extraction Agreement
                    Dated October 23, 2002 (the "Agreement")
                                     between
                            MR3 Systems, Inc. ("MR3")
                                       and
         Consolidated Empire Gold, Inc., Transcontinental Minerals, Inc.
    Consolidated Empire Mines, Ltd., and Empire Gold LLC (collectively "CEG")


Effective this 1st day of May, 2003, MR3 and CEG hereby agree to amend certain
Sections of the Agreement, as follows:

         1.       The date set forth in Section 3.1(b) is changed from December
                  31, 2002, to December 31, 2003; and

         2.       The date set forth in Section 3.1(d) is changed from March 31,
                  2003, to March 31, 2004; and

         3.       The date set forth in Section 3.1(e) is changed from December
                  31, 2003, to June 30, 2004; and

         4.       Pursuant to Section 10, the parties agree that MR3 may assign
                  the Agreement to its majority-owned subsidiary TechMining,
                  LLC, a Colorado LLC; provided, however that MR3 shall continue
                  to be legally bound by and to all the terms and conditions of
                  the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement to be executed on the date first written above by their duly
authorized representatives.

MR3 Systems, Inc.


By: /s/ RANDALL S. REIS
    ---------------------------------
    Randall S. Reis, Chairman and CEO


Consolidated Empire Gold, Inc.
Operator - Grace Mining Project


By: /s/ RAYMOND P. HEON
    ---------------------------------
    Raymond P. Heon, President


Transcontinental Minerals, Inc.


By: /s/ RAYMOND P. HEON
    ---------------------------------
    Raymond P. Heon, President


Consolidated Empire Mines, Ltd.


By: /s/ RAYMOND P. HEON
    ---------------------------------
    Raymond P. Heon, President, Marquette Minerals, Inc., General Partner


Empire Gold LLC

By: Consolidated Empire Gold, Inc., its Operator


    /s/ RAYMOND P. HEON
    ---------------------------------
    Raymond P. Heon, President
No. 82-5951.

#### Doroshow *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 of
CABLE NET, INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO
No: III-19-011 May 21, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Open House to Discuss

2018 Performance of Byron Nuclear Power Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of the Byron 

nuclear power station, operated by Exelon Generation Co., during an open house on May 28, in 

Byron, Ill.

The open house, to be held at the Jarrett Prairie Center, 7993 North River Road, will run 

from 6-7 p.m. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss the plant’s performance.

Byron operated safely during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection findings and 

performance indicators were of very low safety significance. As a result, it remains under the 

NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from 

the Region III office located in Lisle, Ill. 

The annual assessment letter for Byron as well as the notice for the open house, are available 

on the NRC website. Current performance information is also available for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
# .PULASKI

Dedicated to your success

www.pulaskitech.edu Tecnntcat cuttege

September 17,**201~ ,·~**  U.S. Department qf.

### Transpprt~tion Docket Operations,'M-30··· West Building ground floor Room W12-14o· 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, PC 20590**~** '.

SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. Exemption No: 10168 Docket Number FAA-2002-13291
De.ar Sir. or Madarn,

..

. 

### . . ' 

## JE:fJARTMENTOF 1 

## R/-.NSPORTAT!ON



## ·**;'j:~'KET**

## OPERATIONS

ZUt

### l 

## SEP 25 

# P I: 3'l

I am writing inresponse ofthe notice that my exemption for FAAtesting will expire November 30,**201~.** , , .. . . ; :'i ._.**'·~** '· I request that an extehsion of

### th~ exemption be approved for my organization. The ability to test students upon the completion oftraining has greatly benefited their ability to succeed in their pursuit of FAA mechanics certification. In the past a student had to complete 12 months oftraining before being evaluated on the first 3 months ofthat training.
Since the approval ofthis exemption the completion rate of our curriculum has increased. The number ofstudents completing the entire maintenance training program has also increased.
With the implantation ofthis exemption students are more confident and self reliant as to their ability to succeed in the program. It has benefited this program immensely.
I hope to have our exemption extended another 2 years. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely,

# ~~ Steven 

### L. Hotle, Director Pulaski Technical College

- Aviation Technology Center PH: (501) 835-5420 FX: (501) 834-7859

Aviation Maintenance Technology Center 16oo West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock. AR 72120 Phone ')01·835·5420 ·fax 501-834·7859Date: 04/26/2012 Exemption No: 10168 from 14 CFR (FAP Section)- Part: 65.75 (a) will expire on 11/30/2012. Ifappropriate, please submit your request to extend this exemption (including the docket number FAA-2002-13291) within 30 days ofthe date ofthis notice. Otherwise, the FAA may notbeable to process your request for extension before the expiration date. You may either submit your request electronically through the internet using the Docket Management System web site at: http://Regulations.gov/or mail your request to:
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Steve Hotle Director Pulaski Technical College 1600 West MarylandAvenue North Little Rock, AR 72120

Submission to other locations may delay processing. Any requestforextension must meetthe requirements of 14 CFR part 11. Ifyou have already requested an extension for this exemption or no longer need this exemption, please ignore this noticj. \ 

### li l Ill Ill \\ II II\ 1\ Ill j IIIII 11 \1 Ill II I IIIII I Ill I II I II Ill llllll



# 1
#### William Thompson *v.*Edward Morris.

S-Frorn Burke,

’Uie terns of a sale were, that persons purchasing to the amount *oí*20s. or upwards, should have a credit of twelve months; that they should give bond with approved security; and those not complying with these terms, should pay four shillings in the pound for disappointing the sale, and return the goods before sunset. A mare was put up for sale, and struck off to A. at the price of *£SQ*6. The mare was delivered to him, but he failed to give bond and security, and he did not offer to return the mare for several days, wheii B. refused to receive her ; and immediately brought an action of *in-debitatus assumpsit,*for the price. Held, that the action affirmed the sale, and therefore could not be sustained before the term of credit expired. An action for breach of contract in not giving bond with security, or for notreturning the mare, would have been the proper remedy. ,

In this case, the Plaintiff declared in *indebitatus, as-' spmpsit,*for the price of a marc sold and delivered to the *Defendant;*and on the trial he proved that ata pub-*249He vendue made by him on the 25th August 1808, con1ducted according to certain terms then publicly proclaimed and made known to the Defendant, the mare was put up and struck off' to the Defendant, at the price of 4250 6s. he being the highest bidder; that the property was delivered to him, but he omitted to give bond and security for the sum bid, on that day or at any other time, nor did lie return or tender the mare oh the day of sale,; that a few days afterwards, the Plaintiff called on the Defendant for his bond and security, which he did not give, and then for the first time offered to return the mare, which the Plaintiff refused to accept. The suit was commenced in October, 1808.

Part of the terms of sale were, that those who purchased to the amount of tweuty shillings or upwards, should have a credit of twelve months; that persons purchasing should give bond with sufficient security; and that those who did not comply with the terms of sale, should pay four shillings in the pound, for disappointing the sale, and return the goods before sunset. Tiie case was submitted, ^nd

HendersoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

v It is clear from the authorities, that the present action affirms the sale; therefore, it cannot be sustained before the term of credit expires. An action for the breach of .contract, in not giving the bond, or for not returning the tnare, would have been the proper remedy. The principles which govern this case are well established and clearly laid down, in 4 *East,*147, and 3 *Bos.*& *Pull.*582. As, therefore, tins action was commenced before the cause of action occurred, a nonsuit must be entered.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1679 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1679

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2017

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To ensure that the Federal Emergency Management Agency's current 
  efforts to modernize its grant management system includes applicant 
        accessibility and transparency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FEMA Accountability, Modernization 
and Transparency Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall ensure the ongoing modernization of the grant 
systems for the administration of assistance under the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 
et seq.) includes the following:
            (1) An online interface, including online assistance, for 
        applicants to complete application forms, submit materials, and 
        access the status of applications.
            (2) Mechanisms to eliminate duplication of benefits.
            (3) If appropriate, enable the sharing of information among 
        agencies and with State, local, and tribal governments, to 
        eliminate the need to file multiple applications and speed 
        disaster recovery.
            (4) Any additional tools the Administrator determines will 
        improve the implementation of this section.
    (b) Implementation.--To the extent practicable, the Administrator 
shall deliver the system capabilities described in subsection (a) in 
increments or iterations as working components for applicant use.

SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts 
otherwise authorized.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```