alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No: I-19-013 June 10, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC to Hold Public Meeting on

2018 Performance at Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of the Indian 

Point nuclear power plant, operated by Entergy Nuclear, during a public meeting in Tarrytown, N.Y., 

on June 20.

The meeting, to be held at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, 455 South Broadway in Tarrytown, 

will run from 7-9 p.m. NRC staff responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss its performance.

Indian Point Units 2 and 3 operated safely in 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection 

findings and performance indicators were of very low safety significance, or green. As a result, both 

units remain under the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection 

annually.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance 

indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight.

Inspections at Indian Point are performed by three NRC resident inspectors and specialist 

inspectors from the Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa. 

The Indian Point annual assessment letter, as well as the meeting notice, are available on the 

NRC website. Current performance information for Indian Point Unit 2 and Unit 3 is also available and 

updated quarterly.
Exhibit 10.1

 

Greg Hanson

General Manager & Chief Operating Officer

 

January 28, 2011

 

Dear Greg:

 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your efforts in 2010 for TREE.COM, INC. (“Tree”) and its Related Companies.  In recognition of those efforts, Tree.com BU Holding Company, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby awards to you fifty (50) shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in this letter and the attached Standard Terms and Conditions (the “Restricted Shares”).  All capitalized terms used in this letter that are not otherwise defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Standard Terms and Conditions.  In the event of any conflict between the terms of this letter and the Standard Terms and Conditions, the terms set forth in this letter shall govern.

 

The “Grant Date” of your Restricted Shares shall be January 28, 2011 and you will become 100% vested in the Restricted Shares on the third anniversary of the Grant Date (the “Vesting Date”) provided that you are continuously employed by Tree or its Related Companies through the Vesting Date, as described in the Standard Terms and Conditions.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Standard Terms and Conditions, the Company Repurchase Right and your Sale Right (as described under the applicable sections of the Standard Terms and Conditions) shall first become effective following the Vesting Date.  As such, the Fair Value of your Restricted Shares shall be determined following the Vesting Date in the manner described in the Standard Terms and Conditions.  For purposes of clarity, upon the happening of an Early Vesting Event, the Fair Value of your vested Restricted Shares shall not be determined prior to the Vesting Date and the Company Repurchase Right and your Sale Right shall not become effective until after the Vesting Date.  Upon becoming effective, the Company Repurchase Right and your Sale Right shall be governed by the applicable sections of the Standard Terms and Conditions.

 

For purposes of determining Fair Value in connection with the Company Repurchase Right and your Sale Right, it is anticipated that the Company’s EBITDA will be that which is directly attributable to the www.tree.com website. EBITDA directly attributable to the assets acquired by Tree from morefocus group, inc. shall also be included in the calculation of the Company’s EBITDA.

 

Please note that your employment by Tree and its Related Companies is on an “at will” basis.  Neither this letter nor the Standard Terms and Conditions create an employment contract or affect the right of Tree to terminate your employment, or change the terms and conditions of such employment, at any time without notice.

 

Please sign below to acknowledge your acceptance of this award of Restricted Shares and the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in this letter and in the attached Standard Terms and Conditions.

 

 

	
 
    	
ACCEPTED   AND AGREED
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Greg   Hanson
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

InPhonic, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-123601 and No. 333-133859) on Forms S-8 of InPhonic, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated March 8, 2005, except as to note 1(c) and note 4, which are as of
March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated statement of operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.



|                 |  |  |  |             
|---------------- |  |  |  | ------------
|                 |  |  |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|                 |  | 
|McLean, Virginia |  |  |  |             
|June 4, 2007     |  |  |  |
No. 90-6246.

#### Phillippi *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014363EN.01018501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 363/185 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1078/2014 of 7 August 2014 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 297 of 15 October 2014](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2014_297_R_TOC)
)

On page 5, in point 2(d) of the Annex, in the amendments to Part 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012:

for:

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(d) | the following entries are added: | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Chemical | CAS No | Einecs No | CN code | Category (\*) | Use limitation (\*\*) | | “Azocyclotin | 41083-11-8 | 255-209-1 | 2933 99 80 | p | | | Bitertanol | 55179-31-2 | 259-513-5 | 2933 99 80 | p | | | Cinidon-ethyl | 142891-20-1 | n.a. | 2925 19 95 | p | | | Cyclanilide | 113136-77-9 | 419-150-7 | 2924 29 98 | p | | | Cyhexatin | 13121-70-5 | 236-049-1 | 2931 90 90 | p | | | Ethoxysulfuron | 126801-58-9 | n.a. | 2933 59 95 | p | | | Oxadiargyl | 39807-15-3 | 254-637-6 | 2934 99 90 | p | | | Rotenone | 83-79-4 | 201-501-9 | 2932 99 00 | P”’ | | |

read:

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(d) | the following entries are added: | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Chemical | CAS No | Einecs No | CN code | Category (\*) | Use limitation (\*\*) | | “Azocyclotin | 41083-11-8 | 255-209-1 | 2933 99 80 | p | b | | Bitertanol | 55179-31-2 | 259-513-5 | 2933 99 80 | p | b | | Cinidon-ethyl | 142891-20-1 | n.a. | 2925 19 95 | p | b | | Cyclanilide | 113136-77-9 | 419-150-7 | 2924 29 98 | p | b | | Cyhexatin | 13121-70-5 | 236-049-1 | 2931 90 90 | p | b | | Ethoxysulfuron | 126801-58-9 | n.a. | 2933 59 95 | p | b | | Oxadiargyl | 39807-15-3 | 254-637-6 | 2934 99 90 | p | b | | Rotenone | 83-79-4 | 201-501-9 | 2932 99 00 | p | sr”’ | |

---
#### Olmsted, Appellant, vs. Town of Greenfield, Respondent.

*December 11, 1913*

January *13, 1914.*

*Highways: Defects: Injury to automobile: Contributory negligence.*

A verdict finding plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence is supported by evidence tbat, while driving an automobile at the rate of twelve miles per hour, he left the main track of a country road, and that the under part of his car struck and was damaged by a stump ten inches high which was in the middle of the traveled sidetrack and, though partially concealed, was visible for a distance of fifty to seventy-five feet.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Monroe county: E. C. Higbee, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor tbe appellant there was a brief by *Mindhm ■& Mina-han,*and oral argument by *E. B. Minahan.*

For tbe respondent tbe cause was submitted on tbe brief of *Thorwald*P. *Abel.*

TimliN, J.

Where there is evidence tending to show tbat in tbe center of a traveled sidetrack of a country road there is an oak stump ten inches high partially concealed by green oak sprouts about two feet high and by weeds, but visible to one approaching from tbe west for a distance of fifty to seventy-five feet, and tbe plaintiff going east in an automobile'at tbe rate of twelve miles per hour left' tbe main traveled track and took tbis sidetrack, and tbe under part *453of his automobile struck. this stump aud was damaged, a verdict finding plaintiff guilty of-contributory negligence is not without evidence to support it.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann 
|                   |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann     
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer



47
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Validation on Failure & Leak-Rate Correlations for Stress Corrosion Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes (NUREG/CR-6774)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6774 (PDF 4.30 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2001**Date Published:** May 2002

**Prepared by:**S. Majumdar, S. BakhtiariK. Kasza, J. Y. Park

Energy Technology DivisionArgonne National Laboratory9700 South Cass AvenueArgonne, IL 60439

J. Muscara, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering TechnologyOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6041

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report summarizes models for the prediction of failure pressures and leak rates under normal operation and design-basis accident conditions in steam generator tubes with axial and circumferential cracks. These models were first validated through failure and leak rate tests at room temperature and at 282°C on tubes with rectangular, triangular, and trapezoidal notches fabricated by electrodischarge machining. They were then compared with failure and leak rate tests conducted on tubes with laboratory-generated outer-diameter stress corrosion cracks and steam generator tubes with field-induced stress corrosion cracks, which have highly complex morphology. Complex crack profiles are addressed using a model based on the concept of equivalent rectangular cracks. The predictions of the models are in reasonable agreement with test results, the time-dependent initiation and increase of leak rates observed in some tests cannot be predicted by the model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1637

WILSON OCHAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MORTGAGE INVESTORS GROUP,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:24-cv-00928-CMH-WBP)

Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilson Ochar, Appellant Pro Se. John Bell Williams, III, ORRICK, HERRINGTON & 

SUTCLIFFE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1637 Doc: 50 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Wilson Ochar seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action 

without prejudice and permitting him 21 days to file an amended complaint. This court 

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Ochar seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 

796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (“When a district court grants a plaintiff leave to amend but 

[]he chooses not to do so,” the court’s decision is “not . . . final and, thus, not appealable.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, we deny 

each of Ochar’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1637 Doc: 50 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Sweet, Respondent, vs. Underwriters Casualty Company and another, Appellants.

*December 8, 193*1

January *12, 1932.*

From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor entered on the 25th day of April, 1931, the defendants appealed.

For the appellants there was a brief by Fiedler, *Gctrrigcm & Grimm*of Beloit, and oral argument by *E. C. Fiedler.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Nolan, Dough-erty, Grubb & Ryan*of Janesville, and oral argument by *W. H. Dougherty.*

Nelson, J.

This action grew out of the same accident involved in *Sweet v. Underwriters Casualty Co. (ante,*p. 447, 240 N. W. 199). It was tried at the same time and, by stipulation, was heard at the same time on appeal. It is in all respects ruled by the decision in the *Sweet Case*except as to the question of damages. The jury assessed the plaintiff’s damages at the sum of $500. Appellants contend that such damages are excessive. It appears from the testimony of the plaintiff that she sustained a hard blow on her head which resulted in a cut on the top of her head. The right side of her face from the eye down was cut by glass. Her *456knees and arm were hurt and her chest bruised. Her face also was somewhat bruised. She was unconscious for a short period of time and remained in bed as a result of her injuries for three weeks. The cut on her face healed up in two or three weeks but the cut on her head did not heal up for about five weeks. The pain in her head continued for some time thereafter. The accident proved to be quite a shock to her and nervously unsettled her, resulting in her inability to sleep at night for five or six weeks. As a result of her disability much of her garden stuff went to waste which otherwise would have been sold.

Under all of the circumstances, we cannot say that the amount of the damages found by the jury, which received the approval of the trial court, is excessive.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Review of the Effects of Radiation on Microstructure and Properties of Concretes Used in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-7171)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7171 (PDF - 7.63 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:****Date Published:**
**Prepared by:** Kaspar William University of Houston Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Houston, TX 77204-4003

Yunping Xi University of Colorado Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering Boulder, CO 80309-0428

Dan Naus Oak Ridge National Laboratory Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6069

Herman L. Graves, III, NRC Technical Monitor

NRC Job Code N6978

**Prepared for**: Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No: I-19-027 October 30, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Assigns New Senior Resident Inspector at Nine Mile Point

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of 

Prussia, Pa., have selected Gregory Stock as the new senior 

resident inspector at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The 

two-unit site is located in Scriba, N.Y.

Since joining the agency in 2013, Stock has worked as a 

reactor engineer in the NRC Region I office and as a resident 

inspector at Nine Mile Point. Most recently, he was a resident 

inspector at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant. Prior to 

joining the NRC, Stock worked at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard, 

specializing in propulsion machinery. He earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering 

from Penn State University. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Stock joins Resident Inspectors 

Beth Sienel and Jacob Dolecki at Nine Mile Point.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRadioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-2907)

# Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants: Annual Report 2012 (NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 18)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 18 (PDF – 1.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2018**Date Published:** September 2018

**Prepared by:** J. Davis

Oak Ridge Associated Universities 1299 Bethel Valley Road, SC-200, MS-21 Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Steven Garry and Micheal Smith, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

There are 104 commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) licensed to operate on 65 sites in the United States (U.S.) regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each year, each power reactor sends a report to the NRC that identifies the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents discharged from the facility. In 2012, these effluent reports comprised about 10,000 pages of information, which described the radioactive materials discharged, as well as the resulting radiation doses to the general public. This report summarizes that information and presents the information in a format intended for both nuclear professionals and the general public.

The reader can use this report to quickly characterize the radioactive discharges from any U.S. NPP in 2012. The radioactive effluents from one reactor can be compared with other reactors. The results can also be compared with typical (or median) effluents for the industry, including short-term trends and long-term trends.

Reference information is included so the reader can compare the doses from NPP effluents with the doses the general public receives from other sources of radiation, such as medical procedures, industrial devices, and natural materials in the environment.

Although all operating NPPs released some radioactive materials in 2012, all effluents discharged were within the NRC's and the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) public dose limits, and NRC "as low as is reasonably achievable" (ALARA) criteria. Additionally, the doses from radioactive effluents were much less than the doses from other sources of natural radiation that are commonly considered safe. This indicates radioactive effluents from NPPs in 2012 had no significant impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021