Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 4313 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of calcium hypochlorite from 

China were subsidized within the 

meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and dumped within the 

meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on August 

29, 2014 (79 FR 51605). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on November 

25, 2014, and all persons who requested 

the opportunity were permitted to 

appear in person or by counsel. 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determinations in these 

investigations on January 21, 2015. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 4515 (January 

2015), entitled Calcium Hypochlorite 

from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 

510 and 731–TA–1245 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 21, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01378 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–945] 

Certain Network Devices, Related 

Software and Components Thereof (II); 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 19, 2014, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems, 

Inc. of San Jose, California. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain network 

devices, related software and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,023,853 (‘‘the ’853 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 6,377,577 (‘‘the ’577 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,460,492 (‘‘the 

’492 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,061,875 

(‘‘the ’875 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,224,668 (‘‘the ’668 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 8,051,211 (‘‘the ’211 patent’’), 

and alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and a cease and 

desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Institution 

of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1337. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2014). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 20, 2015, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain network devices, 

related software and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 46–52, 54, 56, and 59– 

63 of the ’853 patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 7– 

10, 12–16, 18–22, 25, and 28–31 of the 

’577 patent; claims 1–4, 9–14, 17, and 

18 of the ’492 patent; claims 1–4, 10–13, 

and 15 of the ’875 patent; claims 1–10, 

12, 13, 15–28, 30, 31, 33–43, 45–49, 51– 

64, 66, 67, and 69–72 of the ’668 patent; 

and claims 1, 2, 6–9, 12, 13, and 17–20 

of the ’211 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Cisco 

Systems, Inc., 170 W Tasman Drive, San 

Jose, CA 95134. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Arista Networks, Inc., 5453 Great 

America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 

95054. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge, and the 

Chief Administrative Law Judge is 

authorized to consider whether to 

consolidate Inv. No. 337–TA–944 with 

Inv. No. 337–TA–945, and to 

consolidate them if he deems it 

appropriate. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4314 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: January 21, 2015. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01349 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–944] 

Certain Network Devices, Related 

Software and Components Thereof (I) 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 19, 2014, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems, 

Inc. of San Jose, California. A 

supplement was filed on January 8, 

2015. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain network devices, related 

software and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent No. 7,162,537 (‘‘the ’537 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,356,296 (‘‘the 

’296 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,290,164 

(‘‘the ’164 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,340,597 (‘‘the ’597 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 6,741,592 (‘‘the ’592 patent’’); 

and U.S. Patent No. 7,200,145 (‘‘the ’145 

patent’’), and alleges that an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and a cease and 

desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2014). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 20, 2015, Ordered That— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain network devices, 

related software and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 1, 2, 8–11, and 17–19 

of the ’537 patent; claims 1, 6, and 12 

of the ’296 patent; claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and 

18 of the ’164 patent; claims 1, 14, 15, 

29, 39–42, 63, 64, 71–73, and 84–86 of 

the ’597 patent; claims 6–10, 17, 18, 20, 

21, 23, and 24 of the ’592 patent; claims 

1, 3, 5, 7–11, 13, 15–29, 33–37, and 39– 

46 of the ’145 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Cisco 

Systems, Inc., 170 W Tasman Drive, San 

Jose, CA 95134. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Arista Networks, Inc., 5453 Great 

America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 

95054. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge, and the 

Chief Administrative Law Judge is 

authorized to consider whether to 

consolidate Inv. No. 337–TA–944 with 

Inv. No. 337–TA–945, and to 

consolidate them if he deems it 

appropriate. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 21, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01347 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–946] 

Certain Ink Cartridges and 

Components Thereof: Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 23, 2014, under section 337 of 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES