alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           880,565
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    362,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                      89,809
<INVENTORY>                                      520,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,027,356
<PP&E>                                           702,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                   149,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,368,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            646,211
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,250,500
<COMMON>                                             338
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,406,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,368,401
<SALES>                                        1,470,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,470,631
<CGS>                                            966,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    966,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  64,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 6,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (179,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (35,877)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (143,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (143,505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 98-2191

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

FRANKLYN RIVERA-SANTIAGO,

a/k/a FRANKY,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Chief Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Selya, Circuit Judge.

Evelyn Quinones Carrasquillo on brief for appellant.

June 6, 2001
-2-

Per Curiam. Franklyn Rivera Santiago appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty plea to various narcoticsrelated offenses. Counsel for Rivera has submitted an Anders

brief and a motion to withdraw, asserting that there are no

meritorious issues to be raised on appeal. See Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738; 1st Cir. Loc. R. 46.4(a)(4). Rivera

has not filed a separate brief, although he has been informed of

his right to do so. After carefully reviewing the Anders brief

and transcripts of the plea colloquy and sentencing hearing, we

agree with counsel that the appeal presents no issue having an

arguable basis in law or fact. 

Rivera was initially tried and convicted along with a

co-defendant, Edwin Alamo. Those convictions were reversed on

appeal by this court, and prior to a second trial, Rivera pled

guilty to one count of attempting to possess narcotics with

intent to distribute. The district court, noting Rivera's

status as a police officer, sentenced Rivera at the high end of

the applicable guideline imprisonment range. In contrast,

Alamo, who also pled guilty and who was assigned the same baseoffense level as Rivera, was apparently sentenced at the low end

of the guideline range. On appeal, Rivera contends that since

he was less culpable than Alamo, he also should have been
-3-

sentenced at the low end of the guideline range. It is well

settled, however, that we have no jurisdiction to review a

sentence within the applicable guideline range. United States

v. Brennan, 994 F.2d 918, 929-30 (1st Cir. 1993).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant S.
Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                     By: /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
                                         -------------------------------------
                                     Name: Shant S. Hovnanian
                                     Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                     Date: August 14, 2002
Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002-2066 1 st

. Court of Appeals 01

- 15 -00464- CV

To Honorable Justices of Court I am requesting an extension on filing my brief. My request are twofold, one I have had a flair up from my injuries and have been having severe back and leg pain and I had to obtain funds in order to pay for Documents that will be requested from Post Judgment Department of the District Court.

Andrew Patterson, Pro Se, /s/ Andrew Patterson, Pro Se 6207 Fondren Road Houston, Texas 77036 832 276 1712

CC Vaughan E. Waters vwaters@thorntonfirm.com ACCEPTED 01-15-00464-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/21/2015 3:59:41 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002506
<NAME> CASTLE & COOKE
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         683,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,066,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,239
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,634
<SALES>                                         63,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,687
<CGS>                                           55,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Morris Sheriff *vs.*George D. Murray.

Cumberland County.

Decided October 10, 1922.

*Harry S. Judelshon and Edward J. Harrigan,*for plaintiff.

*Frederic J. Laughlin and Albert E. Anderson,*for defendant.

An action to recover one half of the amount of the commissions received or due the defendant by reason of the sale of a certain parcel of real estate. Both parties are real estate brokers. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant promised to pay him one half the commission resulting from the sale of the property if he would assist in interesting his brother in the pruchase óf it. The brother of the plaintiff purchased or traded for the property, but the defendant denied there was any agreement to pay the plaintiff one half the commission or that the plaintiff materially aided in the consummation of the negotiations.

The issue was solely one of fact, and depended upon the veracity of the witnesses. The jury heard and saw them and found for the defendant. It would clearly be usurping the province of the jury for this court to set aside their verdict in this case, arrived at without bias or prejudice so far as the evidence shows. Motion overruled.
---

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER
63 OFTITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Medicure Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for
the year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") that, to the best of their
knowledge:

(1) the Form 20-F fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in
the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 27, 2008 | /s/ Albert D. Friesen                     
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                       | -----------------------------------       
|                       | Albert D. Friesen, Chief Executive Officer
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)             
|                       |                                           
|                       |                                           
|Dated: August 27, 2008 | /s/ Dwayne Henley                         
|                       | -----------------------------------       
|                       | Dwayne Henley, Chief Financial Officer    
|                       | (Principal Financial Officer)             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 91-323.

#### Feldman et al. *v.*California.

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., Orange County. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>



<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         10,645,911
<SECURITIES>                                   19,940,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,389,741 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    31,861,707 <F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,207,960
<PP&E>                                             44,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (10,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 95,079,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,938,870
<BONDS>                                        66,163,914 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           43,891
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,932,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   95,079,121
<SALES>                                           187,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,399,178
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,893,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,520,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,985,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                      564,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,420,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,420,878
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.49


<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES MATURED POLICIES RECEIVABLE AND LOANS RECEIVABLE.
<F2> INCLUDES PURCHASED LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES.
<F3> REPRESENTS LONG TERM BORROWINGS OF THE COMPANY.
</FN>



</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC, Utility to Discuss Shipment of Haddam Neck Reactor Vessel

----

----

I-98-100

August 27, 1998

**NRC, UTILITY TO DISCUSS SHIPMENT OF HADDAM NECK REACTOR VESSEL**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Electric Company on Wednesday, September 2, to discuss the eventual shipment of the reactor vessel from the Haddam Neck nuclear power plant, which is undergoing decommissioning. Located in Haddam, Conn., the plant was permanently shut down in December 1996.

The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. in Room 6-B-11 at NRC Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. It will be open to the public for observation.

Connecticut Yankee is exercising the DECON option for the decommissioning of Haddam Neck, a pressurized-water reactor that began operating in 1968. DECON is the alternative in which the equipment, structures and portions of the facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after operations cease.

Once the reactor vessel's highly radioactive internal components have been removed, it will be shipped it to a landfill that accepts low-level radioactive waste. The September 2 meeting will be a preliminary discussion regarding vessel transport plans.

The decontamination and removal of all structures and systems, except the spent fuel storage building, is scheduled for completion by the end of 2002.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No: 19-039 August 21, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Announces Public Meetings Dates and Venues for

Community Advisory Boards Near Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the dates and locations for public 

meetings to be held this summer and fall to receive input regarding best practices for community 

advisory boards associated with decommissioning nuclear power plants.

The Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act, signed into law in January, included 

a requirement that the NRC submit a report to Congress on best practices for community advisory 

boards associated with nuclear power plants. The act requires the NRC to hold a minimum of 10 

public meetings in locations that ensure geographic diversity across the United States, with priority 

given to states that request a public meeting and have a nuclear power reactor currently undergoing 

the decommissioning process. The NRC staff sought public comment in March on where to hold 

these meetings.

The dates and locations have been scheduled for meetings near the following plants. The 

hyperlinks provide additional information regarding the individual meeting notices.

• Palisades, Aug. 21, Benton Harbor, Mich.

• Humboldt Bay, Aug. 26, Eureka, Calif.

• Diablo Canyon, Aug. 27, San Luis Obispo, Calif.

• San Onofre, Aug. 29, San Juan Capistrano, Calif.

• Vermont Yankee, Sept. 10, Brattleboro, Vt.

• Pilgrim, Sept. 11, Plymouth, Mass.

• Kewaunee, Sept. 24, Kewaunee, Wis.

• Zion, Sept. 26, Waukegan, Ill.

• Indian Point, Oct. 2, Cortlandt, N.Y.

• Oyster Creek, Oct. 3, Manahawkin, N.J.

• Crystal River, Oct. 10, Crystal River, Fla.

More information about the public meetings and the best practices report is available on the 

NRC’s webpage dedicated to this project. The staff conducted a webinar Aug. 8 to provide people 
Page | 2

living in other parts of the country an opportunity to provide comments. The webinar presentation 

slides are available on the NRC website.

The results of these meetings, along with any data received as a result of the NRC’s other 

information collection activities, will be captured in a best practice report to be submitted to 

Congress by July 14, 2020.
##### 



Exhibit 32 Rule 13a  14(b)
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned officers of Tollgrade
Communications, Inc. (the Corporation), hereby certify that the Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. Dated: August 5, 2004/s/ Christian L. AllisonName: Christian L. AllisonTitle: Chief Executive Officer/s/ Samuel C. KnochName: Samuel C. KnochTitle: Chief Financial Officer
 45
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of Latesha Nicole M. and Another, Infants. St. Vincent’s Services, Inc., Respondent; Dorothy McC., Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 669]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered March 17, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, terminated respondent-appellant’s parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the two subject children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption by their respective foster parents, following a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court applied the correct standard at the dispositional hearing. Once permanent neglect has been established, here by respondent’s own in-court admission, "the court in the dispositional hearing must be concerned only with the best interests of the child” *(Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147-148). There is no presumption that those interests, which must be established by a preponderance of the evidence, will be served best by return to the natural parent *(supra; Matter of Celeste M.,*180 AD2d *522437, 438). On the evidence presented here, the court properly concluded that the best interests of these special needs children required termination of respondent’s parental rights and transfer of their guardianship and custody for the purposes of adoption. Despite respondent’s recent efforts at rehabilitation, her situation remains unsettled, "[t]he children had bonded with the foster parents and there was no evidence of a positive, meaningful relationship with respondent to warrant a suspended judgment” *(Matter of Amanda R.,*215 AD2d 220, citing *Matter of Michael B.,*80 NY2d 299, 311). Concur — Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nárdelli and Tom, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27956]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 780 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-481, K2025-478.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27956 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                           |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA     |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   |  |