alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                      MATZEL & MUMFORD AT WEST WINDSOR, LLC
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                           27,621
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    56,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                   4,038,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              4,122,977
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                4,122,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         4,140,289
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (17,312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  4,122,977
<SALES>                                                         592,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                592,786
<CGS>                                                           578,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   578,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 23,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (9,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (9,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (9,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: File

FROM: George Faison

SUBECT: Presentation to NESCAUM

A presentation was made on May 13, 2010 to th e Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management to provide an overview ofthe proposed rule Identification of NonHazardous Secondary Materials that are Soli d Wastes. The presentation focused on the following topics:

• Background and Purpose of the Rule

• Overview of the January 2, 2009 Adva nce Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

• Proposed approaches in the proposed rulemaking

• Next Steps
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
David A. Steinberg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of InPhonic, Inc. (the Registrant), certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the Report), that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. SteinbergName:

David A. SteinbergDate:

March 16, 2006
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 1986

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, June 9, 2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Edgar Prue, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 347]

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: The People appeal from an order dismissing counts one through six of the indictment. Counts one and two of the indictment charge defendant with assault in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 120.05 (2). County Court erred in dismissing those counts upon the ground that the People failed to present evidence legally sufficient to establish that, in the manner in which they were used, a belt and wall constituted dangerous instruments *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [13]). Testimony that defendant struck his 12-year-old son six or seven times, and perhaps as many as 10 times, in a whipping motion with the leather belt he usually wore with his police uniform was legally sufficient, if unexplained and uncontradicted, to establish that, in the manner in which it was used, the belt constituted a dangerous instrument *(see, People v Rozanski,*209 AD2d 1018, *lv denied*84 NY2d 1038; *People v White,*167 AD2d 870, *lv denied*77 NY2d 845; *People v Rollins,*120 AD2d 896, *lv denied*68 NY2d 773). Similarly, testimony that defendant struck the back of his son’s head against a wall in the family home several times with sufficient force to crack the wall is legally sufficient to permit the Grand Jury to find that the wall was used as a dangerous instrument *(see, People v Galvin,*65 NY2d 761; *People v O’Hagan,*176 AD2d 179).

The court also erred in dismissing counts one through six of the indictment charging assault in the second and third degrees upon the ground that the prosecutor erroneously instructed the Grand Jury on the defense of justification. The prosecutor instructed the jury that Penal Law § 35.10 (1) "in no way [permits] the cruel beating of children” and that "the law recognizes that a parent may use some physical force in disciplining their children, but it has to be reasonable and in no way gives them permission to cruelly beat their children.” That instruction regarding the extent of force one may reasonably believe to be necessary is consistent with case law *(see, Matter of M. Children,*91 AD2d 612, 613, *appeal dismissed*58 NY2d 1046) and was not so erroneous or misleading as to impair the integrity of the Grand Jury proceeding or to render it defective *(see, People v Caracciola,*78 NY2d 1021, 1022; *People v Goetz,*68 NY2d 96, 115-116; *People v Calbud, Inc.,*49 *874NY2d 389, 396). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Court, Brandt, J. — Dismiss Indictment.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Calvin Kantonen                    
| | ---------------------------------------
| | Calvin Kantonen
Chief Financial Officer

















---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Post-Test Calculation of the PKL-2 Test G7.1 Using RELAP5/MOD3.3  (NUREG/IA-0499)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0499 (PDF – 1.18 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2017**Date Published:** February 2019

**Prepared by:** V Martinez-Quiroga, F. Reventos, and C. Pretel

Institute of Energy Technologies Technical University of Catalonia ETSEIB, Av. Diagonal 647, Pav. C  08028 Barcelona Spain 

Kirk Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP) 

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Thermalhydraulic Studies Group of Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) holds a large background in nuclear safety studies in the field of Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) code simulators. This report analyzes with RELAP5mod3.3 the G7.1 PKL Test. This experiment is part of a Counterpart Test performed in LSTF and PKL Test Facilities within the framework of the OECD/NEA ROSA-2 and PKL-2 projects. Detailed core nodalizations and Pseudo 3D modeling have been object of study as well as the capabilities of the code for reproducing the correlation between the Core Exit Temperature (CET) and the Peak Cladding Temperature (PCT).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1763** 

In R e: CHRISTOPHER EARL COTTRELL , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 3:16

- cv - 00200

- HEH

- RCY )

Submitted : October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher Earl Cottrell , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Earl Cottrell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his in forma pauperis application and his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)
. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court granted Cottrell leave to proceed in forma pauperis and denied his § 2254 petition , we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proc eed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would n ot aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
[639 NYS2d 242]

#### In the Matter of Nicholas Capobianco, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Seventh Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

March 8, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gerard, M. LaRusso,*Buffalo *(Daniel Drake*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Lawrence J. Andolina*of counsel, Rochester *(Harris, Beach & Wilcox),*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court *180on February 7, 1986 and maintains an office in Rochester. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent’s answer denied material allegations of the petition and a Referee was appointed to conduct a trial on the issues of fact raised by the pleadings. The Referee filed a report that petitioner moves to confirm and respondent moves to reject.

The Referee found that respondent consistently failed to preserve and identify client funds in his attorney-client trust account, commingled his personal funds with his client funds in the trust account, used the trust account to pay for personal and business expenses, failed to maintain a running balance of his trust account activity and failed to maintain individual client ledger sheets reconciled with his trust account obligations.

We confirm the report of the Referee and conclude that respondent has violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (A) (5) and (8) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5], [8])— engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice and that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law; and

DR 9-102 (A), (B) and (C) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [a], [b], [c])— failing to maintain and preserve client funds and to keep records related to client funds entrusted to him.

We have considered the matters in mitigation, including the fact that no client sustained a financial loss as a result of respondent’s misconduct. Therefore, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from practice for one year and until further order of the Court.

Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Fallon and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.
No. 91-6099.

#### Burton, aka Johnson *v.*Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No: 19-011 March 8, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC’s Felix Gonzalez Honored as a 2019 NSPE Federal Engineer of the Year

Felix Gonzalez, a reliability and risk engineer at the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, has been chosen by the National Society of 

Professional Engineers as one of the top 32 professional engineers in the 

federal government. Gonzalez received the honor in late February, during the 

NSPE’s 40th annual ceremony at the National Press Club in Washington, 

D.C.

Gonzalez is chief of the Performance and Reliability Branch in the 

NRC’s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. He was recognized for 

exceptional leadership contributions to the agency’s safety mission while in 

that office’s Risk and External Hazards Analysis Branch. Gonzalez headed a 

multidisciplinary team examining the risks of moving and storing spent nuclear fuel in dry casks. 

This work evaluated both human performance and equipment design risks associated with dry cask 

storage. The project provided the basis for a risk-informed licensing approach aimed at reducing 

risk and prioritizing industry and NRC resources. 

The NSPE, which serves more than 26,000 licensed professional engineers of all disciplines, 

promotes the ethical and competent practice of engineering. Federal agencies employing at least 50 

engineers may nominate candidates for the Federal Engineer of the Year award. Top candidates are 

honored each year and the society names a single winner at the ceremony. Recent NRC honorees 

include Gabriel Taylor (2015) and David Stroup (2014), both with the Office of Nuclear Regulatory 

Research.

Gonzalez earned a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Puerto 

Rico at Mayaguez and a master’s degree in reliability engineering from the University of Maryland. 

He holds a Professional Engineer license with the state of Maryland.
Exhibit 21.1

Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated

List of Subsidiaries

As of March 1, 2006



|                                        |  |                             
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                    |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|                                        | 
|Bramex Management, Inc.                 |  | British Virgin Islands      
|                                        | 
|JSC Caspi Neft TME                      |  | Republic of Kazakhstan      
|                                        | 
|Transmeridian Caspian Petroleum LLP     |  | Republic of Kazakhstan      
|                                        | 
|Transmeridian (Kazakhstan) Incorporated |  | British Virgin Islands      
|                                        | 
|Emba-Trans LLP                          |  | Republic of Kazakhstan      
|                                        | 
|Transmeridian Exploration Inc.          |  | British Virgin Islands      
|                                        | 
|TMEI Operating, Inc.                    |  | Texas
No. 90-6236.

#### Dorani *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

s0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

150480

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150480

COA: 323619

Kent CC: 08-012557-FC

JOSE ALBERTO VEGA, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
---

EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors Medicure Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-8 of Medicure Inc., filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) (File No. 333- 146574) of our report dated
September 27, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Medicure
Inc. as of May 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity (deficiency) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2010 which
report appears in the May 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Medicure Inc.

Our report dated September 27, 2010 contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that the Company has experienced operating losses and cash
outflows from operations since incorporation and has significant debt servicing
obligations that it does not have the ability to repay that raise significant
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.

Our report dated September 27, 2010 refers to a change in
accounting policy for the Company adopting the new recommendations of CICA
Handbook Section 3064, which replaces Section 3062, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets and Section 3450, Research and Development Costs. The effect
of those changes is discussed in note 2(r) to the consolidated financial
statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants

Winnipeg, Canada September 28, 2010

---
(September 25, 1995)

#### Alert Medical Personnel, Respondent, v Philip Rera et al., Appellants.

[631 NYS2d 433]

In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated April 4, 1994, which granted the plaintiffs motion, *inter alia,*to dismiss their counterclaim and imposed sanctions of $500 against their attorney.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs motion is denied, and the sanctions are vacated.

Under the court’s conditional order of preclusion, the defendants had 60 days from service of a copy of the order with notice of entry to comply with the plaintiffs discovery demands. The order was served by mail on August 31, 1993, giving the defendants until November 4, 1993 to serve their responses *(see,*CPLR 2103 [b] [2]; *see also, Sultana v Nassau Hosp.,*188 AD2d 647). The defendants complied with the court’s order by serving their responses on November 1, 1993. Accordingly, the defendants’ counterclaim should not have been dismissed and sanctions should not have been imposed. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE PRIME AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2022-1





Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1


c/o Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-B


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement dated as of May 4, 2022 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1, as Issuer, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 26 th day of March, 2024.





CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ SANJIV YAJNIKName:Sanjiv YajnikTitle:President, Financial Services