alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Changes in Tech, Strategy Drive Missile Defense

By Jim GaramoneDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Heather Clement TessmerAppellee /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 1, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00153

- CV

Tina M. Allen SOUZA

, Appellant

v.

Heather Clement TESSMER

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 15319 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal, A ppellant ’ s brief wa s due to be filed with this court on April 27, 2015

. On the due date, A ppellant filed a first motion for extension of time to file A ppellant ’ s brief until May 27, 2015, or in the alternative, May 18, 2015

— for an extension of twenty days.

Appellant ’ s motion for a twenty

- day extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief
is due on May 18, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

_______________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME  STATEMENT OF OMNIPOINT  CORPORATION  AS OF AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001002532
<NAME>                                         OMNIPOINT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         84,913
<SECURITIES>                                   22,053
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,938)
<INVENTORY>                                    19,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,511
<PP&E>                                         521,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (34,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,652,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,089
<BONDS>                                        477,915
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       516
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,652,579
<SALES>                                        23,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28,278
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             59,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (201,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (201,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (201,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (3.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (3.92)
        


</TABLE>
No. 90-6094.

#### Wilken *v.*Whitley, Warden, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 121 

Making supplemental appropriations for the Army Corps of Engineers for 

flood control projects and storm damage reduction projects in areas 

affected by flooding in the city of Houston, Texas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

Making supplemental appropriations for the Army Corps of 

Engineers for flood control projects and storm damage 

reduction projects in areas affected by flooding in the 

city of Houston, Texas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any 

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the 

5 fiscal year ending September 30, 2017: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 121 IH

1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

2 CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL

3 CONSTRUCTION

4 For an additional amount for ‘‘Construction’’ for 

5 flood control projects and storm damage reduction 

6 projects in areas affected by flooding in the city of Hous7 ton, Texas, that have received a major disaster declaration 

8 pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

9 Emergency Assistance Act, $311,000,000, to remain 

10 available through fiscal year 2026: Provided, That such 

11 amount is designated by the Congress as being for disaster 

12 relief pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(D) of the Balanced 

13 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

14 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Flood Con15 trol Supplemental Funding Act of 2017’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Staff to Hold Performance Review Meeting for Peach Bottom Plant

----

----

**NRC STAFF TO HOLD PERFORMANCE REVIEW MEETING FOR PEACH BOTTOM PLANT**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant on Thursday, August 12, to discuss the results of the agency's latest Plant Performance Review for the facility. PECO Nuclear Corp. operates the twin-reactor plant, which is located in Delta, Pa.

Results of the review are contained in NRC news release I-99-37, which was issued on April 13. That press release can be found on the agency's web site.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Muddy Run Information Center, 172 Bethesda Church Road West in Holtwood, Pa. The meeting will be open to the public for observation. At its conclusion, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from interested observers and to meet with state and local officials.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, GPU to Discuss Apparent Violations at TMI Plant

----

----

I-97-56

May 19, 1997

**NRC, GPU NUCLEAR TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT TMI PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with GPU Nuclear Corporation officials on Thursday, May 22, to discuss apparent violations of agency guidelines at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Middletown, Pa. Seven of the violations pertain to weaknesses in the performance and control of design basis calculations. Four others involve the downgrading of equipment classifications at the plant.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 9 a.m. in the public meeting room at NRC Region 1 offices in King of Prussia. It will be open to the public for observation only.

Regarding the design basis calculation violations, during inspections conducted late last year and earlier this year, the NRC evaluated, among other things, the capability of several key plant systems to perform their required safety functions. The inspectors identified several weaknesses, in particular the use of non-conservative inputs and assumptions in the analysis for a switchover from the borated water storage tank to the reactor building sump under post-accident conditions. Such a switchover, had it been implemented using instrument setpoints and procedures in effect at the time, had the potential to result in the entrapment of air in the emergency core cooling system, which could have rendered the pumps inoperable.

In the course of other inspections performed earlier this year, the NRC found that GPU Nuclear had downgraded the classification of a number of components from safety-related to a lower tier without appropriate safety evaluations. Meanwhile, other component classifications were downgraded without the necessary supporting engineering documentation.

An NRC decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference does not mean the agency has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point any errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit
      13.2**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Prana Biotechnology Limited (the “Company”)
      on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Revelins,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Richard Revelins*Richard
                      Revelins
                    Chief
                      Financial Officer






September
      27, 2007




*  The
      originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
      Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Shanahan Asks All DoD Personnel to Read, Internalize New Defense Strategy

By Jim GaramoneDoD News, Defense Media Activity

**Foundational for Future Budgets**

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In the Matter of Cedric Reid, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 92]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner is an inmate who was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting extortion, forgery and impersonation as the result of his attempt to have a mail-order catalogue company pay him for merchandise he claimed to have ordered but never received. Although the transcribed testimony of the mail-order company representative is omitted from the record, as are portions of the testimony of a correction counselor and a correspondence clerk, we do not find such missing information material to the determination or so significant as to preclude meaningful review *(see, Matter of Rodriguez v Coughlin,*167 AD2d 671).

Indeed, the letters to the mail-order company, in which petitioner threatened to commence litigation if his money was not refunded, were admitted into evidence and petitioner conceded that the handwriting in those letters was his. In addition, petitioner wrote a letter to a representative of the Consumer Protection Department complaining about the alleged fraud perpetrated upon him by the mail-order company. Moreover, there was evidence that petitioner submitted authorizations signed by fictitious correction officers to the mail-order company in connection with his request for a refund and that his monthly inmate account statements did not reveal a disbursement in the amount of the alleged order. In view of the foregoing, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt. Lastly, we have considered petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer was biased and find it to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS PREPARED FOR USE BY THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION ONLY, AND IS UNAUDITED.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          92,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,954<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       5,226,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,989,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,555,123
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       283,394
<OTHER-SE>                                          10
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,683,384<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,640
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,795)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE STATED NET OF ALLOWANCES AND ALSO INCLUDE ACCRUED REVENUES.
<F2>THE COMPANY DOES NOT REPORT USING A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F3>INCLUDES LIMITED PARTNERS' INTEREST IN SPG OPERATING PARTNERSHIP OF $645,472.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Converted by EDGARwiz


FINANCIAL   AGREEMENT




This Financial Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made by and between China Venture II Incorporation (the “INC”) and Andrew Chien, collectively the “Parties”, on January 15, 2011.




Whereas the “INC” is a Nevada registered stock incorporation, a blank check company with the purpose as a vehicle for business combination, and Andrew Chien who is the owner of “INC”.




Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:




Andrew Chien agrees to personally pay for expenses incurred by the “INC” for business combination. The financing is no amount and time limitation until the amendment or another agreement being reached between parties. 




Agreed to and accepted as of January 15, 2011 by:







China Venture II Inc.                            Individual









       /s/ Andrew Chien                          /s/ Andrew Chien
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 1996

January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
No: II-19-035 September 24, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta 

have selected Wesley Deschaine as the NRC Senior 

Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant 

near Spring City, Tenn., located approximately 60 miles 

southwest of Knoxville. 

Deschaine joins Resident Inspector Jeff Hamman at 

the two-unit plant, which is operated by the Tennessee 

Valley Authority.

Deschaine joined the NRC in 2007 as a reliability and risk analyst in the agency’s Office of 

New Reactors in Rockville, Md. He transferred to the Region II office in Atlanta in 2009 as a 

project engineer for the TVA projects branch and worked as a resident inspector at TVA’s 

Sequoyah nuclear plant from 2011 to 2018. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Deschaine worked as a reliability engineer for Lockheed Martin’s 

Missiles and Fire Control Division in Orlando, Fla. Deschaine earned Bachelor of Science and 

Master of Science degrees, both in electrical engineering from the University of Central Florida.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Watts Bar resident inspectors can be reached at 404-997-5300.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, Utility to Discuss Haddam Neck Radiological Controls

----

----

I-97-135

October 16, 1997

NRC, UTILITY TO DISCUSS HADDAM NECK RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Northeast Utilities on Thursday, October 23, to discuss the radiological controls program at the Haddam Neck nuclear power plant in Haddam, Conn.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. in the Upper Merion Township Building, 175 West Valley Forge Road, King of Prussia, Pa. The municipal building is located at the intersection of Route 23 and Henderson Road. It will be open to the public for observation.

Last March, the NRC issued a letter to plant owner Northeast Utilities confirming it had agreed to take several steps aimed at improving the Haddam Neck radiological controls program. The commitments were prompted by several problems indicating continuing weakness in the management and control of radiological work at the facility.

At the October 23 meeting, NU will describe improvements, both achieved and planned. Such a meeting is required prior to the utility eliminating any of the interim compensatory measures, including radiological work restraints, that were previously put in place as the result of NRC-identified weaknesses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021