alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1323 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reduce unnecessary 

emergency room visits under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. COLLINS of New York (for himself and Mr. FLORES) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reduce 

unnecessary emergency room visits under the Medicaid 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Unnecessary 

5 Emergency Room Visits under Medicaid Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE OPTION TO IMPOSE HIGHER COST SHARING 

7 FOR NONEMERGENCY USE OF EMERGENCY 

8 ROOM SERVICES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1916 of the Social Secu10 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396o) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1323 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘up to 

2 twice the nominal amount’’ and inserting ‘‘up to 

3 $25’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘up to 

5 twice the nominal amount’’ and inserting ‘‘up to 

6 $25’’. 

7 (b) STATE OPTION FOR ALTERNATIVE PREMIUMS

8 AND COST SHARING.—Section 1916A(e)(2) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396o–1(e)(2)) is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘twice the 

11 amount determined to be nominal under section 

12 1916’’ and inserting ‘‘the amount specified in para13 graph (3) of subsection (a) or (b) (as applicable) of 

14 section 1916 with respect to non-emergency serv15 ices’’; and 

16 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘a nomi17 nal amount (as otherwise determined under section 

18 1916)’’ and inserting ‘‘the amount specified in para19 graph (3) of subsection (a) or (b) (as applicable) of 

20 section 1916 with respect to non-emergency serv21 ices’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply with respect to items and services 

24 furnished on or after October 1, 2017. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kensey Nash Corporation;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
February 9, 2005

/s/ Joseph W. KaufmannJoseph W. KaufmannChief Executive Officer
 
 ****
 ****
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94761-94762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28018]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-603-604 and 731-TA-1413-1415 (Review)]

Glycine From China, India, Japan, and Thailand;

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on glycine from 
India, Japan, and Thailand, and the countervailing duty orders on 
glycine from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on May 1, 2024 (89 FR 
35237) and determined on August 5, 2024, that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (89 FR 76507, September 18, 2024).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It

[[Page 94762]]

completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on November 22, 
2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 
5564 (November 2024), entitled Glycine from China, India, Japan, and 
Thailand: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-603-604 and 731-TA-1413-1415 
(Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 22, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-28018 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                      |  |                                                                                             
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE
COMPANY  By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |  |  | 
|March 15, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | By:                                                                                  |  | /s/    JOSEPH P.
CAVANAUGH                                                                  
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                      |  | Joseph P. Cavanaugh Chief Executive Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
[640 NYS2d 33]

#### In the Matter of Paul G. Reilly, Jr. (Admitted as Paul Gorman Reilly, Jr.), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

March 26, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Andral N. Bratton*of counsel *(Hal R. Lieberman,*attorney), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

*97OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

This is an application by petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee to disbar respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g).

Respondent Paul G. Reilly, Jr. was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on March 13, 1961 under the name Paul Gorman Reilly, Jr. At all times relevant to this proceeding he has maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.

By order entered May 23, 1995, this Court granted petitioner’s motion to suspend respondent from practice pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (2) and 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) based upon his failure to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation of allegations of professional misconduct. (211 AD2d 145.)

Respondent did not answer petitioner’s motion to suspend, which included the following: "please take further notice that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), an attorney who is suspended and who has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement for six months from the date of an order of suspension may be disbarred.” In addition, although more than six months have passed since the order of suspension, he has not appeared or applied in writing to the Committee or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement. Nor has he responded to the motion for disbarment. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g). *(See, Matter of Rubin,*208 AD2d 192.)

Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Williams, JJ., concur.

Motion granted, and respondent disbarred from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective March 26, 1996.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0576

SAT Date: 10/12/2012

Print Date: 5/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 32

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

MECH IRR-E,S

LUNG

ONCO

UNCERT MUTA

UNCERT IMMUNO

UNCERT DEVEL

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0576

FATE: 

 with MP > 800 C (M)
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes, based on anlogs. There is 

concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble respirable 

particles. There also are concerns for mechanical irritation to the eye and skin and for 

oncogenicity, as well as uncertain concerns for mutagenicity and immunotoxicity, based on 

analogs. There also is uncertain concern for developmental toxicity, based on the concern for 

oncogenicity and uncertain concern for mutagenicity.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for 

SAR chemical class = ; MW > 1,000,000 with 

unknown mp (P); pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs
SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
#### I. Fleischer & Sons, Respondent, vs. Goodrich & Martineau Company, Appellant.

*February 11*

March *9, 1926.*

*Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co., ante,*p. 406, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto county: W. B. Quinlan, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The appeal is from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Classon, Whitcomb & Kuzenski*of Oconto, and oral argument by *Walter F. Kuzenski*and *Allan V. Classon.*

*413For the respondent there was a brief by *Megan & Megan*of Oconto, and oral argument by *Giles Megan.*

Doerfler, J.

This case is ruled by the case of *Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co., ante,*p. 406, 207 N. W. 954.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in the *Mayfield Woolen Mills Case, supra.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7560
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GERALD PIERRE CARTER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-338-JFM, CA-96-1335-JFM) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Gerald Pierre Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Carmina Szunyog Hughes, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carter , Nos. CR-88-338-JFM; CA-96-1335-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No: 19-064 December 17, 2019

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

NRC to Issue Early Site Permit to Tennessee Valley Authority for Clinch River Site

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has authorized the issuance of an Early Site Permit for 

Tennessee Valley Authority’s Clinch River site near Oak Ridge, Tenn. The permit closes several siterelated issues, including many environmental impacts, for small modular reactors at the site.

The Commission authorized the agency’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation to issue the 

permit following a hearing on Aug. 14, 2019. The Commission found the staff’s review of TVA’s 

application adequate to make the necessary regulatory safety and environmental findings. The permit, 

which will be valid for up to 20 years from date of issuance, is expected to be issued in the next few 

days.

The permit does not authorize any NRC-regulated construction activities. TVA would need to 

apply separately for an NRC license to build and operate a reactor at the site. The permit includes 

additional provisions, including approved analysis methods, that deal with the NRC’s emergency 

preparedness regulations. This could allow a future license applicant at the Clinch River site to request

an emergency preparedness zone smaller than those found at current U.S. nuclear power plants.

The NRC staff’s technical review of TVA’s application also covered issues such as how the 

site’s characteristics could affect plant safety and environmental protection considerations. The staff 

published a final environmental impact statement for the permit on April 3, 2019, and a final safety 

evaluation on June 24, 2019. More information on the Clinch River ESP review is available on the 

NRC website.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Gavadin, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 351]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of Supreme Court entered October 20, 1994, resentencing him following a violation of probation to one year in the Erie County Correctional Facility. Defendant argues that he was improperly denied a restitution hearing before he was sentenced to a term of probation. The record on appeal contains a notice of appeal from only the judgment of October 20, 1994; nothing in the record indicates that defendant filed a notice of appeal from the original judgment of conviction. Under those circumstances, this Court may review only the propriety of the judgment resentencing defendant and cannot review defendant’s present challenge to the original judgment of conviction *(see,*CPL 450.30 [3]; *People v Dabbs,*178 AD2d 848, *lv denied*79 NY2d 946; *People v Lugo, 176*AD2d 177, 178). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 6, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00618

- CV

A. S. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUS TICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the o rder signed by the tr i a l cou rt on October 5, 2023

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Because appell ant is

indigent and u nable t o pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
No. 91-673.

#### Block, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, et al. *v.*Bouman.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 90-6049.

#### Steele *v.*County of Los Angeles.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT**
 **TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of AmeriChip International, Inc. .(the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2006, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Thomas
        Schwanitz ,
        Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
        that:
 
 The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        March 12, 2007
 
 /s/ Thomas
        Schwanitz
 Thomas
        Schwanitz ,
 Chief
        Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 31st MEU Hones Naval Integration Operations during Mission Rehearsals from Guam to Okinawa

By Capt. George McArthur31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News