alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the
Statement of Income for the nine months ended March 31, 1997 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          21,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,777
<PP&E>                                          18,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,313,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          826,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,705,693
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,413,600
<SALES>                                        154,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,690
<CGS>                                        1,016,274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,016,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (861,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
No. 85-6642.

#### Allen *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Griffith*v. *Kentucky, ante,*p. 314.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0461

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NICOLE ABENICIA NOLI,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILE

SEP 2 3 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana • ORDER.

Nicole Abenicia Noli moves this Court to appoint the Office of the State Public

Defender, pursuant to § 47-1-104(4)(c), MCA. As grounds, Noli states that she retained

counsel in her underlying crirninal case with her parents' financial assistance and that she

does not have such assistance for this appeal. She further states that she cannot afford an

attorney to represent her on appeal. Noli adds that she contemporaneously submitted a

financial application to the Office of the State Public Defender.

Noli includes a copy of the July 20, 2020 Judgment and Order Deferring Sentence

from the Seventh Judicial District Court, Dawson County. Noli entered guilty pleas to

felony criminal possession of dangerous drugs (rnethamphetarnine) and misdemeanor

criminal possession of drug paraphernalia. The District Court deferred imposition of the

three-year term and imposed a suspended, six-month jail term for the misdemeanor. Noli

has a recent felony conviction, and she rnay be entitled to appointment of counsel in this

appeal. Section 46-8-103(1), MCA. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Noli's Motion for Appointrnent of Counsel is GRANTED.

The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date of this Order

within which to file either a Notice of Appearance or a Motion to Rescind this Order

appointing counsel. In the event the Appellant qualifies for appointed counsel, the

Appellate Defender Division shall immediately order transcripts.

09/24/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0461
The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the

Appellate Defender Division, to counsel of record, and to Nicole Abenicia Noli personally.

le- GI DATED this e. —day of September, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice
### High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint [6/15/2011 10:50:54 AM] You are here: EPA Home Prevention, Pesticides & Toxic Substances Pollution Prevention & Toxics High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Submission Report 

# High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS)

Contact Us 

### Search: All EPA This Area


# Submission Report

Submission Information
Submission ID : 25419329 Submission Name : 56-40-6 - Glycine AR Number :


## Chemical Information
CAS Number : 56-40-6 Ninth Collective Index Name : Glycine



## Submitter Information
Submitter's Name : Orphan Address : City : State : VA ZIP/Postal Code : Country : Type of Submitter : Company 

## Technical Point of Contact Information
Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address : 

## Additional Technical Point of Contact Information
Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address : 

## Sponsor Information Sponsor's Name : Orphan Chemical Address : City : State : VA ZIP/Postal Code : Country : US Phone Number : Fax Number : Share

### High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint [6/15/2011 10:50:54 AM] EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint Print As-Is Last updated on Wednesday, June 15, 2011 E-Mail Address : Type of Sponsor : Company 

## Technical Point of Contact Information
Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address :
No: 19-015 March 13, 2019

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

John W. Lubinski Named Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

John W. Lubinski has been selected as the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. He will transition into the position later this 

month. He succeeds Marc Dapas, who retired in February 2019.

“John Lubinski is a proven leader with a wide range of experience at the NRC, having 

served in a variety of key roles across the agency for nearly 29 years,” said NRC Executive Director 

for Operations Margaret M. Doane. “His dedication and commitment to ensuring public health and 

safety in his regulatory capacity makes him a superb choice for this important position.”

Lubinski began his career at NRC as a mechanical engineer in NMSS in May 1990 serving 

in a number of high profile positions, including Senior Enforcement Specialist, Office of 

Enforcement; Chief, Inspection Section; and Chief, Fuel Manufacturing Section in NMSS. He held 

several other key positions in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, including Director, 

Division of Engineering. Most recently, he served as Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Security 

and Incident Response.

Lubinski is a graduate of the NRC Senior Executive Service Candidate Development 

Program and Leadership Potential Program. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical

Engineering from the University of Maryland.
Exhibit 23.1




               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-25795) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of Adage, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2002 (except for Note 19,
as to which the date is March 22, 2002), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of RELM Wireless Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Jacksonville, Florida
April 8, 2003
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and in their related prospectuses of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc., as listed below, of our
reports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc., Apple Hospitality Two, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



|                          |  |                                                                                     
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RegistrationStatement No. |  | Description                                                                         
|333-112981                |  | Form S-3D, pertaining to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan



/s/
Ernst & Young LLP



Richmond, Virginia

March 10, 2005
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shant S. Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
        November 14, 2008
  By:
        /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
 Name:
        Shant S. Hovnanian
 Title:
        Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
   23
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Note to Editors: NRC Meetings Scheduled with Millstone Station

----

----

I-98-20

February 25, 1998

**Note to Editors:**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled the following upcoming meetings on Millstone Station in Waterford, Conn.:

On Tuesday, March 3, at 9:00 a.m., the NRC's Special Projects Office staff will meet with Northeast Utilities officials and representatives of Sargent & Lundy, and Parsons Power Group to discuss the status of the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program at Millstone Units 2 & 3. The meeting is open to the public for observation and will be held in the Leland F. Sillin Training Center at the Millstone site.

On March 3 at 1:00 p.m., officials from the NRC, NU and Little Harbor Consultants will meet to discuss the Millstone Employee Concerns Program, the Safety Conscious Work Environment. Little Harbor will present its findings and recommendations. This meeting, at the Training Center, is open to the public for observation only.

On Wednesday, March 4, at 9:00 a.m., the Special Projects Office staff will meet with NU to discuss the status of restart activities at Millstone. The meeting will be held at the Training Center. It is open to the public for observation.

On Wednesday evening, March 4, the NRC staff will meet with the public to provide an update on the status of the Millstone recovery efforts. The meeting, which begins at 7:00 p.m., will be held at the East Lyme Community Center.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND JUNE 29, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                THREE MONTHS      THREE MONTHS       SIX MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                    ENDED             ENDED             ENDED             ENDED
                                                JUNE 28, 1997     JUNE 29, 1996     JUNE 28, 1997     JUNE 29, 1996  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>               <C>                <C>
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   $2,033,461        $1,611,917        $3,212,754         $2,569,666
                                                 ==========        ==========        ==========         ========== 
Common and common equivalent shares:
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      during the period  . . . . . . . . . . .    5,676,862         5,445,610         5,654,543          5,444,708
 
      Common shares issuable upon exercise
          of outstanding stock options
               Primary . . . . . . . . . . . .      265,583           495,957           303,304            458,815
               Fully diluted . . . . . . . . .      287,381           495,957           306,623            493,595

      Common and common equivalent shares
          outstanding during the period
               Primary . . . . . . . . . . . .    5,942,445         5,941,567         5,957,847          5,903,523
                                                 ==========        ==========        ==========         ========== 
               Fully diluted . . . . . . . . .    5,964,243         5,941,567         5,961,166          5,938,303
                                                 ==========        ==========        ==========         ========== 
Earnings per share data
      Net income per common and common
          equivalent shares
               Primary . . . . . . . . . . . .     $   0.34          $   0.27          $   0.54           $   0.44
               Fully diluted . . . . . . . . .     $   0.34          $   0.27          $   0.54           $   0.43
</TABLE>


                                       19
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10074

Conference Calendar

NICANDRO P UCCIFERRI,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

RODNEY CHANDLER, Warden Big Spring Federal Correctional Institution,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:08-CV-131

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nicandro P. Ucciferri, federal prisoner # 10339-018, appeals the dismissal

for lack of jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his sentence

for maintaining a building for the purpose of manufacturing marijuana.

Ucciferri argues that he is actually innocent, having been convicted of conduct

that did not constitute a federal criminal offense. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-10074

2

Ucciferri may bring this claim in a § 2241 proceeding only by

demonstrating under the “savings clause” that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy

would be “inadequate or ineffective.” Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d

893, 900 (5th Cir. 2001). “[T]he savings clause of § 2255 applies to a claim

(i) that is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which

established that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense

and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should

have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” Id. at

904. Conceding that his actual innocence claim meets neither prong of the

Reyes-Requena test, Ucciferri nevertheless urges us to hold the savings clause

inapplicable under the facts of his case. The Reyes-Requena actual innocence

test, however, is binding precedent in this circuit. See Wesson v. U.S.

Penitentiary Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir. 2002); see also In re

Brown, 457 F.3d 392, 394 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                          
|----------------- |  | -------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008 |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
|                  |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA    
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P08-0512

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1 3

KEYWORDS:

AQUATOX-C

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE:

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 E C (E)

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

HEALTH: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction
( ) is poor all routes based on physical/chemical properties. No significant health

concerns. , but the SAT members could not see how that is possible for the PMN material so the concern expressed for irritation in the past (SAT meeting on 7/15/08) based on the pH is no longer supported. *CEB HEALTH: Low concern (No exposures needed). XB: No testing desired.

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 = * P daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P green algal 96-h EC50 = * P

fish chronic value = 0.001 P daphnid ChV = 0.003 P algal ChV = 0.010 P Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals;

SAR chemical class =); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as

CaCO3; and high concern for chronic toxicity only;

assessment factor =

Becky Jones 564-8919
No. 90-6256.

#### Santana *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Finds Performance 'Acceptable' in Latest Review of Catawba

----

----

No: II-99-25 April 5, 1999

 

**NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE 'ACCEPTABLE' IN LATEST REVIEW OF CATAWBA**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains acceptable in the NRC's latest plant performance review at the Catawba nuclear power plant, operated by Duke Power Company near York, South Carolina.

In a letter to Duke Power outlining the results of the performance review, NRC official Charles R. Ogle said that "overall performance at Catawba was acceptable" and that both units operated for the most part at 100 percent power for the last six months. However, he said that engineering performance, while continuing to be acceptable, declined during the evaluation period, which ran from April 1997 through January 1999. He said that, in addition to the normal inspection program, additional inspections would be conducted in the areas of engineering and fire protection. Additionally, a previously scheduled inspection to assess performance in the areas of maintenance, testing and operation of a plant system will be performed.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region II Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used by the NRC as an interim measure to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of a Reactor Coolant Pump Trip for TRILLO NPP with RELAP5/MOD3.2 (NUREG/IA-0177)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0177 (PDF 2.15 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 2000

**Prepared by:** M. F. Lozano, P. Moreno, PMSA A. L. Cedillo, M. N. Sanjurjo, C. N. TRILLO

PMSA Sector Embarcaciones (Bloque 4°), 17, 1°D 28760 Tres Cantos – Madrid SPAIN

C.N. TRILLO Plaza Carlos Trias Bertran, 7, planta 7° 28020 Madrid SPAIN

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents the comparison between the simulation results and the plant measurements during a Reactor Coolant Pump Trip in C. Trillo Nuclear Power Plant in different burnup conditions.

This work is part of the Spanish contribution to the Code Assessment and Maintenance Program (CAMP) as a member of UNIDAD ELÉCTRICA, S.A. (UNESA).

C. Trillo is a 3010 MWth three loop PWR Nuclear Power Plant designed by Siemens-KWU. Commercial operation started in August 1988, currently the Plant is running the 11th annual cycle.

The simulation has been carried out with the RELAP5/MOD3.2 code, running on a HP 715/50 work-station.

The transient main parameters have been correctly assessed, however predictions at the beginning of transient are more difficult as the reactor remains at a high power level after pump trip.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021