alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
Cable Net, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 05 9- CV IN THE I NT ER EST OF B.I . , et al., Children Fr om the 225th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-PA-02085 Honora ble Charles E. Montema

y or, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: May 20, 2009 DI SMI SSED This is an appea l from a judg ment terminating appellan t’s pare ntal rig hts. The trial cour t found the points on which appe llant states s h e i ntends to appea l to be frivolous. See T EX . F AM . C ODE ANN . § 2 6 3
. 4 0 5 ( c ) , ( d ) ( 3 )
. T h e tr ia l c o u rt a ls o f o u n d th a t a p p e ll a n t i s n o t i n d ig e n t. We order ed appe llant to file a brief on the issue of whe ther the a ppeal is f ri v o l o us by

Marc h 4, 2009. Se e id
. § 263.405(d). We f urther or dere d appellant to provide proof that the f iling fe e in the amount of $175 wa s paid by

Marc h 23, 2009. After appellant f

ailed to respond to either of our orde rs, we or dere d appellant to: (1) f ile an appe llant’s brief c halleng ing the trial court’ s finding that her a ppeal is fr ivolous; and (2) file a n04
- 09
- 00 05 9- CV

- 2- appellant’ s brief c halleng ing the trial court’ s fin ding that she is not indigent or pa y the filing fee
. Our orde r stated that if a

ppellant fa iled to r es p o n d t o our orde r no later than April 13, 2009, the appea l would be dis missed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 42.3(c)
. Appellant did not respond. The a ppeal is dismi ssed. PER C URI AM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRadioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-2907)

# Radioactive Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants: Annual Report 2013 (NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 19)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-2907, Volume 19 (PDF – 1.65 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** April 2018**Date Published:** September 2018

**Prepared by:** J. Davis

Oak Ridge Associated Universities 1299 Bethel Valley Road, SC-200, MS-21 Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Steven Garry and Micheal Smith, NRC Project Managers

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

There are 104 commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) licensed to operate on 65 sites in the United States (U.S.) regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each year, each power reactor sends a report to the NRC that identifies the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents discharged from the facility. In 2013, these effluent reports comprised about 10,000 pages of information, which described the radioactive materials discharged, as well as the resulting radiation doses to the general public. This report summarizes that information and presents the information in a format intended for both nuclear professionals and the general public.

The reader can use this report to quickly characterize the radioactive discharges from any U.S. NPP in 2013. The radioactive effluents from one reactor can be compared with other reactors. The results can also be compared with typical (or median) effluents for the industry, including short-term trends and long-term trends.

Reference information is included so the reader can compare the doses from NPP effluents with the doses the general public receives from other sources of radiation, such as medical procedures, industrial devices, and natural materials in the environment.

Although all operating NPPs released some radioactive materials in 2013, all effluents discharged were within the NRC's and the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) public dose limits, and NRC "as low as is reasonably achievable" (ALARA) criteria. Additionally, the doses from radioactive effluents were much less than the doses from other sources of natural radiation that are commonly considered safe. This indicates radioactive effluents from NPPs in 2013 had no significant impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Assessment of Reactivity Margins and Loading Curves for PWR Burnup-Credit Cask Designs (NUREG/CR-6800)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6800 (PDF - 3.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** November 2002**Date Published:** March 2003

**Prepared by:** J.C. Wagner, C.E. Sanders

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6370

R.Y. Lee, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code W6479

**Prepared for**: Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents studies to assess reactivity margins and loading curves for pressurized water reactor (PWR) burnup-credit criticality safety evaluations. The studies are based on a generic high-density 32-assembly cask and systematically vary individual calculational (depletion and criticality) assumptions to demonstrate the impact on the predicted effective neutron multiplication factor, keff, and burnup-credit loading curves. The purpose of this report is to provide a greater understanding of the importance of input parameter variations and quantify the impact of calculational assumptions on the outcome of a burnup-credit evaluation. This study should provide guidance to regulators and industry on the technical areas where improved information will most enhance the estimation of accurate subcritical margins. Based on these studies, areas where future work may provide the most benefit are identified. The report also includes an evaluation of the degree of burnup credit needed for high-density casks to transport the current spent nuclear fuel inventory. By comparing PWR discharge data to actinide-only based loading curves and determining the number of assemblies that meet the loading criteria, this evaluation finds that additional negative reactivity (through either increased credit for fuel burnup or cask design/utilization modifications) is necessary to accommodate the majority of current spent fuel assemblies in high-capacity casks. Assemblies that are not acceptable for loading in the prototypic high-capacity cask may be stored or transported by other means (e.g., lower capacity casks that utilize flux traps and/or increased fixed poison concentrations or high-capacity casks with design/utilization modifications).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 86-914.

#### Mihalcik *v.*Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Revolving Credit Note



 Exhibit 10.4 
 REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE 
  

					
	 $12,500,000
	  	 	January 21, 2011	  


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GTRADE”), and each Person joined as a Borrower from time to time (each a “Borrower”, and collectively, the “Borrowers”), hereby promise to pay, jointly and severally, to
the order of U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), at the office of Agent (as defined below) at the address set forth in the Loan Agreement (as defined below) or at such other place as Agent may from time to time designate to any
Borrower in writing: (i) at the end of the Term or (ii) earlier as provided in the Loan Agreement, the lesser of the principal sum of Twelve Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($12,500,000) or such lesser sum which then represents such
Lender’s Commitment Percentage of the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Revolving Advances made or extended to any Borrower by U.S. Bank pursuant to Section 2.1(a) of the Loan Agreement, in lawful money of the United States of
America in immediately available funds, together with interest on the principal hereunder remaining unpaid form time to time, at the rate or rates from time to time in effect under the Loan Agreement. 

THIS REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE is executed and delivered under and pursuant to the terms of that certain Amended and
Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), by and among the Borrowers, the various
financial institutions named therein or which hereafter become a party thereto as lenders and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as agent for Lenders (in such capacity, “Agent”) and in its capacity as a Lender. Capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Loan Agreement. 

Each Borrower hereby waives diligence, presentment, demand, protest and notice of any kind whatsoever as further set
forth in the Loan Agreement. 
 This Revolving Credit Note is one of the Notes referred to in the Loan
Agreement, which among other things, contains provisions for the acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain events, for optional and mandatory prepayments of the principal hereof prior to the maturity hereof and for the
amendment or waiver of certain terms and conditions therein specified. 
 THIS REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE SHALL BE
GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS APPLIED TO CONTRACTS TO BE PERFORMED WHOLLY WITHIN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Note the day and year
first written above intending to be legally bound hereby. 
  

			
	GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP LLC
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jerry L. Peters

	 Name:
	 	 Jerry L. Peters

	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer



 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE- U.S. BANK] 

  
 2
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Models for Estimation of Service Life of Concrete Barriers in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal (NUREG/CR-5542, EGG-2597)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5542 (PDF – 2.32 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 1990**Date Published:** September 1990

**Prepared by:** J. C. Walton, L. E. Plansky, R. W. Smith

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Managed by the U.S. Department or Energy

EG&G Idaho, Inc. P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 NRC FIN A6858

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Concrete barriers will be used as intimate parts of systems for isolation of low-level radioactive wastes subsequent to disposal. This work reviews mathematical models for estimating the degradation rate of concrete in typical service environments. The models considered cover sulfate attack, reinforcement corrosion, calcium hydroxide leaching, carbonation, freeze/thaw, and cracking. Additionally, fluid flow, mass transport, and geochemical properties of concrete are briefly reviewed. Example calculations included illustrate the types of predictions expected of the models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                   MATZEL & MUMFORD AT SOUTH BRUNSWICK, LLC
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 313,512 
<SECURITIES>                                                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0 
<INVENTORY>                                         10,278,844 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,592,356 
<PP&E>                                                       0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      10,592,356 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               10,506,615 
<BONDS>                                                      0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0 
<PREFERRED>                                                  0 
<COMMON>                                                     0 
<OTHER-SE>                                              85,741 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        10,592,356 
<SALES>                                              5,452,102 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,458,540 
<CGS>                                                4,986,985 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,986,985 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       394,034 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         77,521 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     77,521 
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0 
<CHANGES>                                                    0 
<NET-INCOME>                                            77,521 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0 
                                                    
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1541 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1541

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2017

Ms. Jenkins of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE LUNETTE BLAIR.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to authorize establishment of the Fort 
Scott National Historic Site, Kansas, and for other purposes.'', 
approved October 19, 1978 (Public Law 95-484) is amended--
            (1) in the first section--
                    (A) by inserting ``only'' after ``donation''; and
                    (B) by striking ``: Provided, that the buildings so 
                acquired shall not include the structure known as 
                `Lunette Blair'''; and
            (2) in section 2--
                    (A) by striking ``When the site of'' and inserting 
                ``(a) When the site of''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The boundary of the Fort Scott National Historic Site 
established under subsection (a) is modified as generally depicted on 
the map referred to as `Fort Scott National Historic Site Proposed 
Boundary Modification', numbered 471/80,057C, and dated February 
2017.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 86-741.

#### Binker, aka Manolo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
November 4, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BARBI DENISE BROWN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00831

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARTIN HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 287 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
No. D-1059.

#### In re Disbarment of Marquardt.

It is ordered that Philip Walter Marquardt, of Phoenix, Ariz., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Opinion issued June 27 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00245
- CV

——————————— RACINE JONES , Appella nt

V. TARA FILLA JONES , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2011
- 20915

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Racine Jones , has neither established indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence) , 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault) ; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T2

C ODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial
Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 1 5

- 91 58 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015)

. Appellant failed to respond to our notice of August 22, 2022, concerning the failure to pay for the clerk’s record. In that notice, the Court advised appellant that failure to pay the fee for the clerk’s record could result in dismissal of this appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule) , 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if

no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault) , 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice. We dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly , Hightower, and Countiss

.