alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1624 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to treat 

certain municipal obligations as no lower than level 2B 

liquid assets, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1624 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Municipal Finance 

3 Support Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA5 TIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 18 of the Federal Deposit 

7 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828) is amended— 

8 (1) by moving subsection (z) so that it appears 

9 after subsection (y); and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(aa) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL OBLIGA12 TIONS.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the final 

14 rule titled ‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk 

15 Measurement Standards; Final Rule’ (79 Fed. Reg. 

16 61439; published October 10, 2014) (the ‘Final 

17 Rule’) and any other regulation which incorporates 

18 a definition of the term ‘high-quality liquid asset’, 

19 the appropriate Federal banking agencies shall treat 

20 a municipal obligation that is both liquid and readily 

21 marketable (as defined in the Final Rule) and in22 vestment grade as of the calculation date as a high23 quality liquid asset that is no lower than a level 2B 

24 liquid asset. 

25 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub26 section: 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1624 RFS

1 ‘‘(A) INVESTMENT GRADE.—With respect 

2 to an obligation, the term ‘investment grade’ 

3 has the meaning given that term under part 1 

4 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations. 

5 ‘‘(B) MUNICIPAL OBLIGATION.—The term 

6 ‘municipal obligation’ means an obligation of a 

7 State or any political subdivision thereof, or any 

8 agency or instrumentality of a State or any po9 litical subdivision thereof.’’. 

10 (b) AMENDMENT TO LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO

11 REGULATIONS.—Not later than the end of the 3-month 

12 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

13 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Board of 

14 Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Comp15 troller of the Currency shall amend the final rule titled 

16 ‘‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement 

17 Standards; Final Rule’’ (79 Fed. Reg. 61439; published 

18 October 10, 2014) to implement the amendments made 

19 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  0
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.000
        


</TABLE>
No: II-19-034 September 24, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Names New Senior Resident Inspector at Oconee Nuclear Power Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta 

have selected Jared Nadel as the NRC Senior Resident 

Inspector at the Oconee Nuclear Power Station near Seneca, 

S.C., located approximately 30 miles west of Greenville.

Nadel joins Resident Inspectors Adam Ruh and Jason 

Parent at the three-unit plant, which is operated by Duke 

Energy.

Nadel received a Bachelor of Science degree in 

Nuclear Engineering and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Physics from North Carolina State University 

in 2003. While at the university and for one year following graduation, he worked as an 

NRC-licensed operator at the North Carolina State University PULSTAR research reactor.

Nadel joined the NRC in 2004 as a reactor inspector in the Region IV office in Arlington, 

Texas. While in Region IV, he worked as an engineering inspector at multiple reactor sites in the 

western U.S. In 2008, Nadel was assigned as the resident inspector at the Surry Power Station in 

eastern Virginia. In 2014, he was promoted to senior resident inspector at the Watts Bar nuclear 

plant in Tennessee, where he oversaw the startup and transition to the commercial operation of 

Watts Bar Unit 2, the first new nuclear reactor brought online in the U.S. in the 21st century.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Oconee resident inspectors can be reached at 404-997-5210.
#### Owen Williams *et al. v.*John C. Ehringhaus *et al.*

Bonds intended to be official, but which are not in conformity to the statute, may be declared on as voluntary bonds at common law.

The case of the *Governor*v. Mellan, (2 *I,aw hep. 460.)*and tire *Go-. ventor v. Witherspoon,*(3 *Hawks*42,) approved..

After the new trial granted in this case, ( *ante*2 *vot.*511) the cause was tried again on the last circuit, before his Honor, Judge Martin, at Pasquotank. The. only question made in the case was, whether the County Court had a right to take the following bond : “ Whenr- *“*ever the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions for the “ county of &c. shall require, we the undersigned, joint- *“*ly and severally, promise to pay to the justices of said ‘4 court or their order, the sum of Ac. In witness where-44 of we have &c.”

The suit was brought in the names of the survivors of those justices, who were in office when the bond was executed.

*298. , , A bono, payable to the justices of a court has the same validity, as if it de-geesby name^1"

His Honor being of opinion for the plaintiffs, a verdict was taken accordingly, and the defendant appealed.

*Iredell,*for the plaintiff.

*Kinney,*for the defendants.

Ruffin, Judge.

It was not expected, after the frequent decisions that bonds intended to be official, which had not that character because of some want of conformity to the statute, were not void, but would be supported as good voluntary bonds at common law, that any question would be again made upon it. *The Governor*v. *Meilan,*(2 *Law*Rep. 460) was the first case upon the subject. *The Governor*v. *Witherspoon,*(3 *Hawks*42) and many others have followed it. And in *the Justices of Cumberland*v. *Armstrong,*it is plainly declared to be the opinion of the court, that a bond payable to the justices of a particular county is not void; for the obli-gees arc sufficiently identified by that description. It follows, that the present bond is valid.

It is said however, that the County Court has no capacity to take such an obligation. Admit it: and what is the consequence ? This bond is not taken to be given 1 ° to the justices, as constituting a court, but given to them ns individuals by the description of their office, instead of their names. That is the ground of all the decisions 0,1 the subject down to that of *Branch*v. *Elliott, (ante*86), Unless, therefore, it is void at common law for uncertainty, it must be supported j and that it is not void for that reason has been settled in those cases. The bond directed by a statute must be taken according to it, to be proceeded on under the statute. But to take such a bond as the present, there is no necessity for a special authority. The distinction is between taking a bond without such an authority, and taking it when forbidden *;*as in the case of bail bonds.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KAREEM OLIVER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 4 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of May , 2022, the “Petition for Review (In the Nature of a

Complaint in Mandamus)” and the “Application for Special Relief (In the Nature of

Peremptory Judgment)” are DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BAM! Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ Raymond C. Musci
---------------------------------------------
Raymond C. Musci
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
September 5, 2002



/s/ Stephen M. Ambler
---------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Ambler
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
September 5, 2002
No. 91-455.

#### Crude Co. *v.*Department of Energy et al.

Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.
#### Hans BOTHKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLUOR ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., et al., Defendants, and W.J. Terry, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 81-5457.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 3, 1984.

Hans Bothke, in pro. per.

Jonathan S. Cohen, John Dudeck, Jr., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Following our opinion in *Bothke v. Fluor Engineers, et al. and W.J. Terry,*713 F.2d 1405, certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3566, 82 L.Ed.2d 867. On July 2, 1984, that Court vacated the judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of *Davis v. Scherer,*468 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3012, 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984).

The cause is now remanded to the district court for the purpose of determining whether Terry is qualifiedly immune in accordance with the standards set forth in *Davis v. Scherer.*

Unless plaintiff-appellant Bothke can meet the burden of showing a violation of constitutional rights that were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue, the district court will enter a judgment of dismissal.
No. 82-1061.

#### Begassat *v.*Cosmopolitan National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust No. 13199, et al.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD2 Post-Test Calculation of the OECD LOFT Experiment LP-SB-1 (NUREG/IA-0074, ICSP–LP–SB–1–R)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0074 (PDF 2.13 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 1992

**Prepared by:** J. Perez, R. Mendizabal

Consejo de Seguaridad Nuclear Justo Dorado, 44 28040 Madrid, Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents the analysis of the OECD LOFT LP-SB-1 experiment performed by the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear of Spain working group making use of RELAP5/MOD2 in the frame of the Spanish LOFT Project.

LP-SB-1 experiment studies the effect of an early pump trip in a small break LOCA scenario with a 3 inches equivalent diameter break in the hot leg of a commercial PWR.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant S.
Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Shant S. Hovnanian
    ----------------------

Name: Shant S. Hovnanian
Title: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 15, 2003


                                       19
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Approves B&W's Request to Dismantle Building at Pennsylvania Site

----

----

No. 99-68 April 7, 1999

**NRC APPROVES B&W'S REQUEST TO DISMANTLE BUILDING AT PENNSYLVANIA SITE**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved B&W Technologies, Inc.'s request to dismantle a structure known as Building B at its Parks Township, Pennsylvania, facility.

B&W has removed most of the building's residual radioactive material contamination. However, the company's final survey report accompanying the dismantlement request showed that contamination in some areas exceeds NRC limits for unrestricted use. Plans therefore call for such material to be disposed of off-site as radioactive waste.

The company's request to dismantle the building, submitted last November, included a commitment to carry out appropriate radiological and dust controls during dismantlement operations.

NRC staff reviewed the request and supplemental information and coordinated the review and approval with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

B&W conducted licensed operations at the Parks Township site from the late 1950's until the present. These operations included the processing of nuclear material and the decontamination of equipment from other nuclear facilities.

The company has been decommissioning above-ground structures at the site in accordance with an NRC-approved plan since 1995.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1545 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1545

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the authority of the 
 Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose certain patient information 
   to State controlled substance monitoring programs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Prescription Data Accountability 
Act 2017''.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS DISCLOSURE OF PATIENT INFORMATION 
              TO STATE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE MONITORING PROGRAMS.

    Section 5701(l) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Under'';
            (2) by striking ``a veteran or the dependent of a veteran'' 
        and inserting ``a covered individual''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) In this subsection, a `covered individual' is an individual 
who is dispensed medication prescribed by an employee of the Department 
or by a non-Department provider authorized to prescribe such medication 
by the Department.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 111/19/2014 09:23:51

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Limerick 2 Docket (050- 00353)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT I - Instrumentation & Control T - Testing 

113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

218

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 143 - Tracking / trending LTA X - Site-wide X - Site-wide 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

436

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - M - Mechanical Maintenance / Repair 

327

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER187 - Action implementation LTA P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 11
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JA SON A. STANTON , Appel lant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1797 LT C ase No. 20 21- CF -0 00712

STATE O F F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed January 3, 2023 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt f or Herna ndo County. Daniel B

. M erritt , Jr. , Judge. Matthew J. M etz, Public Defender, a nd Joseph Chloupek , A ssis tant Public Defender, D aytona B each, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d L. Charlene Matthews , A ssistant A ttorney General, D aytona Beach, f or Appellee. PER CUR IAM. AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, WALLIS and HARRIS , JJ. , concur.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1961]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 238 Under Alternative Site 
Framework, Dublin, Virginia

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the New River Valley Economic Development Alliance, Inc., 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 238, submitted an application to the 
Board (FTZ Docket B-19-2014, docketed 02-26-2014) for authority to 
reorganize under the ASF with a service area including the Counties of 
Alleghany, Amherst, Bedford, Bland, Botetourt, Campbell, Carroll, 
Craig, Floyd, Franklin, Giles, Grayson, Henry, Montgomery, Patrick, 
Pittsylvania, Pulaski, Roanoke, Rockbridge, Smyth, Tazewell and Wythe, 
and the Cities of Bedford, Buena Vista, Covington, Danville, Galax, 
Lynchburg, Martinsville, Radford, Roanoke and Salem, Virginia, within 
and adjacent to the New River Valley Airport Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, and FTZ 238's existing Sites 1 and 2 would be 
categorized as magnet sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (79 FR 12149-12150, 03-04-2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 238 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Site 2 if not activated within five years from 
the month of approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of January 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01231 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 90-6161.

#### Ivery *v.*Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PERMICO ROYALTIES, LLC and ALDEN 

OESTREICH,

Appellants,

v.

BARRON PROPERTIES LTD, 

KNACKWURST PROPERTIES LLC, and E. 

DON POAGE

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00168-CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Ward County, Texas

(TC# 21-09-25858-CVW)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order and render judgment that the Rodgers Deed 

reserved a floating 1/2 royalty interest. 

We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee the appellate costs incurred by 

Appellant and all costs incurred in the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision 

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.