### 31886 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices

Item Estimated time for response (hours) Estimated annual

responses Estimated annual burden hours

Application to Extend Patent Term Under 35 U.S.C. 156 .......................................................... 25 60 1,500 Request for Interim Extension Under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) ......................................................... 1 10 10 Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision Under 37 CFR 1.750 .............................................. 25 3 75 Initial Application for Interim Extension Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ........................................... 20 3 60 Subsequent Application for Interim Extension Under 37 CFR 1.790 ......................................... 1 1 1 Response to Requirement to Elect ............................................................................................. 1 10 10 Response to Request to Identify Holder of Regulatory Approval ............................................... 2 1 2 Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term ................................................. 2 1 2 Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination .................................... 3 1,850 5,550 Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ............................................... 4 10 40 Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application Under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a

Patent Term .................................................................................................................... ......... 2 1 2

Totals ......................................................................................................................... ........... ........................ 1,950 7,252

Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $90. There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection. However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage costs.

There are fees associated with the requirements for patent term extension and patent term adjustment. These fees are covered under OMB control number
0651–0072. The fees are listed in the accompanying table for reference butwill not be included in the annual (nonhour) cost burden for this collection.

Item Fee amount

Application To Extend Patent Term Under 35 U.S.C. 156 .......................................................................... ....................... $1,120.00. Request for Interim Extension Under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) ........................................................................ ........................ $0.00. Petition To Review Final Eligibility Decision Under 37 CFR 1.750 ............................................................... ..................... $0.00. Initial Application for Interim Extension Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ............................................................ ....................... $420.00. Subsequent Application for Interim Extension Under 37 CFR 1.790 ................................................................ ................. $220.00. Response to Requirement To Elect ............................................................................................... ..................................... $0.00. Response to Request to Identify Holder of Regulatory Approval .................................................................. .................... $0.00. Declaration To Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term ................................................................... .................... $0.00. Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination ........................................................... ................. $200.00. Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ................................................................... ................... $400.00. Petition To Accord a Filing Date to an Application Under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term ....................... (large entity) $400.00. (small entity) $200.00. (micro entity) $100.00.

Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO expects that the Application to
Extend Patent Term Under 35 U.S.C. 156, the Initial Application for Interim Extension Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5), and approximately 7% of the other responses for this collection will be submitted by mail. The USPTO estimates that the average first-class postage cost for a mailed submission will be 46 cents and that up to 195
submissions will be mailed to the USPTO per year, for a total estimated postage cost of $90 per year.

The total annual (non-hour) respondent cost burden for this
collection is estimated to be approximately $90 per year.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. The USPTO is soliciting public comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the burden

of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses. Dated: May 22, 2013.

Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2013–12620 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–16–P**

**COMMITTEE FOR THE**
**IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE**
**AGREEMENTS**

**[Docket #: 130430427–3427–01; OMB Control #: 0625–0274 (Expiration:**  **04/30/2016)]**

**RIN 0625–XC006**

**Interim Procedures for Considering Requests From the Public for Textile**  **and Apparel Safeguard Actions on Imports From Panama** 

**AGENCY :**  The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.

**ACTION :**  Notice of interim procedures and request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice sets forth the interim procedures the Committee for


### 31887 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices

the Implementation of Textile Agreements (‘‘CITA’’) will follow in implementing certain provisions of the
United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement (‘‘US-Panama TPA’’). Title III, Subtitle B, Section 321 through
Section 328 of the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (‘‘Implementation Act’’) [Pub. L. 112–43] authorizes the President to consider requests from the public for textile and apparel safeguard actions. The President has delegated to CITA the authority to determine whether imports of a Panamanian textile or apparel article are causing serious damage, or actual threat thereof, to a domestic industry producing an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the imported article. CITA hereby gives
notice to interested entities of the procedures CITA will follow in considering such requests and solicits public written comments on these interim procedures.

**DATES :**  As of May 28, 2013, CITA intends to use these interim procedures to process requests from the public. CITA solicits public written comments on the interim procedures. Comments must be received no later than June 27, 2013 in either hard copy or electronically.

**ADDRESSES :**  If submitting comments in hard copy, an original, signed document must be submitted to the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements, Room 30003, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. If submitting comments electronically, the electronic copy must be submitted to

OTEXA

_PANAMA@trade.gov. All submitted comments will be posted for public review on the Web site dedicated to U.S.-Panama TPA textile and apparel safeguard proceedings. The Web site is located on the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s Office of Textile and Apparel Web site ( http:// otexa.ita.doc.gov ), under ‘‘Panama TPA’’/‘‘Safeguards.’’ Additional instructions regarding the submission of comments may be found at the end of
this notice.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Robert Carrigg, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482–3400.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Legal Authority: Section 321 through Section 328 of the Implementation Act and Proclamation No. 8894, 77 FR 66507 (November 5, 2012). Background

Title III, Subtitle B, Section 321 through Section 328 of the Implementation Act implements the textile and apparel safeguard provisions,provided for in Article 3.24 of the USPanama TPA. The safeguard mechanism applies when, as a result of the elimination of a customs duty under the US-Panama TPA, a Panamanian textile or apparel article is being imported into
the United States in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to the domestic market for that article,
and under such conditions as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof to a U.S. industry producing a like or directly competitive article. In these circumstances, Article 3.24 permits the
United States to increase duties on the imported article from Panama to a level
that does not exceed the lesser of the prevailing U.S. most-favored-nation (MFN) duty rate for the article or the U.S. MFN duty rate in effect on the day
the US-Panama TPA enters into force.

The import tariff relief is effective beginning on the date that CITA
determines that a ‘‘Panamanian textile or apparel article,’’ as defined in Section 301(2) of the Implementation Act, is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities, in absolute
terms or relative to the domestic market for that article, and under such conditions that imports of the article cause serious damage, or actual threat thereof, to a U.S. industry producing an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the imported article. Consistent with Section 323(a) of the Implementation Act, the maximum period of import tariff relief, as set forth in Section 3 of this notice, shall be three years. Consistent with Section 323(b) of the Implementation Act, if the initial period of import relief is applied for less than three years, CITA may extend it up to the three year maximum if CITA
determines that the continuation is necessary to remedy or prevent serious damage or actual threat thereof and to facilitate adjustment by the domestic industry to import competition, and
there is evidence that the domestic industry is, in fact, making a positive adjustment to import competition. Import tariff relief may not be applied
to the same article at the same time under these procedures if relief previously has been granted with respect to that article under: (1) These procedures; (2) Subtitle A to Title III of the Implementation Act; or (3) Chapter 1 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.).

Authority to provide import tariff relief with respect to a Panamanian textile or apparel article will expire fiveyears after the date on which the USPanama TPA enters into force.

Under Article 3.24.6 of the USPanama TPA, if the United States provides relief to a domestic industry under the textile and apparel safeguard, it must provide Panama ‘‘mutually agreed trade liberalizing compensation in the form of concessions having substantially equivalent trade effects or equivalent to the value of the additional duties expected to result from the textile safeguard measure.’’ Such concessions shall be limited to textile and apparel products, unless the United States and Panama agree otherwise. If the United States and Panama are unable to agree on trade liberalizing compensation, Panama may increase customs duties equivalently on U.S. products. The obligation to provide compensation terminates upon termination of the safeguard relief. Section 327 of the Implementation Act extends the President’s authority to provide compensation under Section 123 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2133), as amended, to measures taken pursuant to
the US-Panama TPA’s textile and apparel safeguard provisions.

Procedures for Requesting Textile and Apparel Safeguard Actions

1. Requirements for Requests. Pursuant to Section 321(a) of the Implementation Act and Paragraph (7)
of Presidential Proclamation 8894 of November 5, 2012, an interested party may file a request for a textile and apparel safeguard action with CITA. CITA will review requests from an interested party sent to the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements, Room 3100, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Ten copies of any such request must be provided. As provided in Section 328 of the Implementation Act, CITA will protect from disclosure any business confidential information
that is marked ‘‘business confidential’’ to the full extent permitted by law. To
the extent that business confidential information is provided, two copies of
a non-confidential version must also be provided, that is identical to the
business confidential version with the exception that any business confidential information is summarized or, if necessary, deleted. At the conclusion of the request, an interested party must
attest that ‘‘all information contained in the request is complete and accurate and no false claims, statements, or representations have been made.’’ Consistent with Section 321(a), CITA will review a request initially to


### 31888 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices

determine whether to commence consideration of the request on its merits. Within 15 working days of receipt of a request, CITA will consider
the criteria set forth below to determine whether the request provides the information necessary for CITA to consider the request. If the request does not provide the necessary information, CITA will promptly notify the requester
of the reasons for this determination and the request will not be considered. However, CITA will reevaluate any request that is resubmitted with
additional information.

Consistent with longstanding CITA practice in considering textile safeguard actions, CITA will consider an interested party to be an entity (which may be a trade association, firm, certified or recognized union, or group of workers) that is representative of either: (A) A domestic producer or producers of an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the subject Panamanian textile or apparel article; or (B) a domestic producer or producers of a component used in the production of an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the subject Panamanian textile or apparel article.

A request will only be considered if the request includes the specific information set forth below in support of a claim that a textile or apparel article from Panama is being imported into the
United States in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to the domestic market for that article,
and under such conditions as to cause serious damage, or actual threat thereof, to a U.S. industry producing an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the imported article.

A. Product description. Name and description of the imported article concerned, including the category or categories or part thereof of the U.S. Textile and Apparel Category System (see ‘‘Textile Correlation’’ at http:// otexa.ita.doc.gov/corr.htm ) under which such article is classified, the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States subheading(s) under which such article is classified, and the name and description of the like or directly competitive domestic article
concerned.

B. Import data. The following data, in quantity by category unit (see ‘‘Textile Correlation’’), on total imports of the subject article into the United States and imports from Panama into the United

States:

* Annual data for the most recent three full calendar years for which such data are available;

* Quarterly data for the most recent year for which such data are partially available, and quarterly data for the same quarter(s) of the previous year (e.g., January–March 2011, April–June 2011 and January–March 2010, April– June 2010).

The data should demonstrate that imports of a Panamanian-origin textile or apparel article that is like, or directly competitive with, the article produced by the domestic industry concerned are increasing in absolute terms or relative
to the domestic market for that article.

C. Production data. The following data, in quantity by category unit (see ‘‘Textile Correlation’’), on U.S. domestic production of the like or directly competitive article of U.S. origin indicating the nature and extent of the serious damage or actual threat thereof:

* Annual data for the most recent three full calendar years for which such data are available;

* Quarterly data for the most recent year for which such data are partially available, and quarterly data for the same quarter(s) of the previous year (e.g., January–March 2011, April–June 2011 and January–March 2010, April– June 2010).

The requester must provide a complete listing of all sources from
which the data were obtained and an
affirmation that to the best of the requester’s knowledge, the data represent substantially all of the domestic production of the like or directly competitive article(s) of U.S. origin. In such cases, data should be reported in the first unit of quantity in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ( http://www.usitc.gov/
tata/hts ) for the Panamanian textile and/ or apparel articles and the like or directly competitive articles of U.S. origin.

D. Market Share Data. The following data, in quantity by category unit (see ‘‘Textile Correlation’’), on imports from Panama as a percentage of the domestic market (defined as the sum of domestic production of the like or directly competitive article and total imports of the subject article); on total imports as a percentage of the domestic market; and on domestic production of like or directly competitive articles as a percentage of the domestic market:

* Annual data for the most recent three full calendar years for which such data are available;

* Quarterly data for the most recent year for which such data are partially available, and quarterly data for the same quarter(s) of the previous year (e.g., January–March 2011, April–June 2011 and January–March 2010, April– June 2010).

E. Additional data showing serious damage or actual threat thereof. All data available to the requester showing changes in productivity, utilization of capacity, inventories, exports, wages, employment, domestic prices, profits, and investment, and any other information, relating to the existence of serious damage, or actual threat thereof, caused by imports from Panama to the industry producing the like or directly competitive article that is the subject of the request. To the extent that such information is not available, the requester should provide best estimates
and the basis therefore:

* Annual data for the most recent three full calendar years for which such data are available;

* Quarterly data for the most recent year for which such data are partially available, and quarterly data for the same quarter(s) of the previous year (e.g., January–March 2011, April–June 2011 and January–March 2010, April– June 2010).

2. Consideration of Requests. Consistent with Section 321(b) of the Implementation Act, if CITA determines that the request provides the information necessary for it to be considered, CITA will publish in the Federal Register a notice seeking public comments regarding the request, which will include a summary of the request and the date by which comments must
be received. The Federal Register notice and the request, with the exception of
information marked ‘‘business confidential,’’ will be posted by the Department of Commerce’s Office of Textiles and Apparel (‘‘OTEXA’’) on the Internet ( http://otexa.ita.doc.gov ). The comment period shall be 30 calendar days. To the extent business confidential information is provided, a
non-confidential version must also be provided, that is identical to the
business confidential version with the exception that any business confidential information is summarized or, if necessary, deleted. At the conclusion of its submission of such public comments, an interested party must
attest that ‘‘all information contained in the comments is complete and accurate and no false claims, statements, or representations have been made.’’ Comments received, with the exception
of information marked ‘‘business confidential,’’ will also be on the Internet ( http://otexa.ita.doc.gov ) for review by the public. If a comment alleges that there is no serious damage or actual threat thereof, or that the subject imports are not the cause of the serious damage or actual threat thereof, CITA will closely review any supporting information and documentation, such as information about domestic production or prices of like or directly competitive


### 31889 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices

articles. In the case of requests submitted by entities that are not the actual producers of a like or directly competitive article, particular consideration will be given to comments representing the views of actual producers in the United States of a like or directly competitive article.

Any interested party may submit information to rebut, clarify, or correct public comments submitted by any other interested party at any time prior to the deadline provided in this section for submission of such public comments. If public comments are submitted less than 10 days before, or on, the applicable deadline for submission of such public comments, an interested party may submit information to rebut, clarify, or correct the public comments no later than 10 days after the applicable deadline for submission of public comments.

With respect to any request considered by CITA, CITA will make a determination within 60 calendar days of the close of the comment period. If
CITA is unable to make a determination within 60 calendar days, it will publish
a notice in the Federal Register and include the date by which it will make
a determination. If CITA makes a negative determination, it will publish
this determination and the reasons
therefore in the Federal Register

.

3. Determination and Provision of Relief. CITA shall determine whether, as
a result of the reduction or elimination of a duty under the US-Panama TPA, Panama’s textile or apparel article is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities, in absolute
terms or relative to the domestic market for that article, and under such conditions as to cause serious damage, or actual threat thereof, to a domestic industry producing an article that is like, or directly competitive with, the imported article. In making this determination, CITA: (1) Shall examine the effect of increased imports on the domestic industry as reflected in such relevant economic factors as output, productivity, utilization of capacity, inventories, market share, exports, wages, employment, domestic prices, profits, and investment, none of which is necessarily decisive; and (2) shall not consider changes in technology or consumer preference as factors supporting a determination of serious damage or actual threat thereof. CITA, without delay, will provide written
notice of its decision to the Government
of Panama and will consult with said party upon its request.

If a determination under this section is affirmative, CITA may provide import tariff relief to a U.S. industry to the extent necessary to remedy or prevent the serious damage or actual threat thereof and to facilitate adjustment by the domestic industry to import competition. Such relief may consist of an increase in duties to the lower of: (1) The Normal Trade Relations (NTR)/ Most Favored Nation (MFN) duty rate in place for the textile or apparel article at the time the relief is granted; or (2) the NTR/MFN duty rate for that article on the day the US-Panama TPA enters into
force.

The import tariff relief is effective beginning on the date that CITA’s affirmative determination is published
in the Federal Register . The maximum period of import tariff relief shall be three years. However, if the initial period for import relief is less than three years, CITA may extend the period of import relief to the maximum three-year period if CITA determines that the continuation is necessary to remedy or prevent serious damage or actual threat thereof by the domestic industry to import competition, and that the domestic industry is, in fact, making a positive adjustment to import competition. Import tariff relief may not be imposed for an aggregate period greater than three years. Import tariff relief may not be applied to the same
article at the same time under these procedures if relief previously has been granted with respect to that article under: (1) These procedures; (2) Subtitle A to Title III of the Implementation Act; or (3) Chapter 1 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.).

Authority to provide import tariff relief for a textile or apparel article from Panama that is being imported into the
United States in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to the domestic market for that article,
and under such conditions as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof to a U.S. industry producing a like or directly competitive article, will expire five years after the date on which the
US-Panama TPA enters into force.

4. Self Initiation. CITA may, on its own initiative, consider whether imports of a textile or apparel article from Panama are being imported into
the United States in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to the domestic market for that article,
and under such conditions as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof to a U.S. industry producing a like or directly competitive article. In such considerations, CITA will follow procedures consistent with those set forth in Section 2 of this notice, including the publishing of a notice in
the Federal Register seeking public comment regarding the action it is considering.

5. Record Keeping and Business Confidential Information. The Office of Textiles and Apparel (OTEXA) will
maintain an official record for each request on behalf of CITA. The official
record will include all factual information, written argument, or other material developed by, presented to, or obtained by OTEXA regarding the request, as well as other material provided to the Department of Commerce by other government agencies for inclusion in the official
record. The official record will include CITA memoranda pertaining to the request, memoranda of CITA meetings, meetings between OTEXA staff and the public, determinations, and notices published in the Federal Register . The
official record will contain material which is public, business confidential, privileged, and classified, but will not include pre-decisional inter-agency or intra-agency communications. If CITA decides it is appropriate to consider materials submitted in an untimely manner, such materials will be
maintained in the official record. Otherwise, such material will be
returned to the submitter and will not be maintained as part of the official
record. OTEXA will make the official record public except for business confidential information, privileged information, classified information, and
other information the disclosure of which is prohibited by U.S. law.

The public record will be made available for public inspection at the Office of Textiles and Apparel, Room 30003, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on business days.

Information designated by the
submitter as business confidential will normally be considered to be business confidential unless it is publicly available. CITA will protect from disclosure any business confidential
information that is marked ‘‘business
confidential’’ to the full extent permitted by law. To the extent that
business confidential information isprovided, two copies of a nonconfidential version must also be provided, that is identical to the
business confidential version with the exception that any business confidential information is summarized or, if necessary, deleted. CITA will make available to the public non-confidential versions of the request that is being considered, non-confidential versions of any public comments received with respect to a request, and, in the event


### 31890 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices

1 See Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). The text of the DoddFrank Act may be accessed at http://www.cftc.gov./ LawRegulation/OTCDERIVATIVES/index.htm.

2 Pursuant to section 701 of the Dodd-Frank Act, Title VII may be cited as the ‘‘Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010.’’

3 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. 4 7 U.S.C. 4(a)(6). At this time, the Commission is only providing interpretive guidance on the disruptive trading, practices, or conduct discussed
herein. The Commission does not foreclose subsequent promulgation of rules and regulations pursuant to CEA section 4c(a)(6). The Commissionalso notes that new CEA section 4c(a)(5) is selfeffectuating. consultations are requested, the

statement of the reasons and justifications for the determination subsequent to the delivery of the

statement to Panama.

Request for Comment on the Interim

Procedures

Comments must be received no later than June 27, 2013, and in the following

format:

(1) Comments must be in English.

(2) Comments must be submitted electronically or in hard copy, with original signatures.

(3) Comments submitted electronically, via email, must be either in PDF or Word format, and sent to the following email address:

OTEXA

_PANAMA@trade.gov. The

email version of the comments must include an original electronic signature. Further, the comments must have a bolded heading stating ‘‘Public Version’’, and no business confidential information may be included. The email version of the comments will be posted for public review on the Panama TPA Safeguard Web site.

(4) Comments submitted in hard copy must include original signatures and must be mailed to the Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements, Room 30003, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. All comments submitted in hard copy will be made available for public inspection at the Office of Textiles and Apparel, Room 30003, U.S. Department of Commerce,

14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on business days. In addition, comments submitted in hard copy will also be posted for public review on the Panama TPA Safeguard Web site.

(5) Any business confidential information upon which an interested person wishes to rely may only be included in a hard copy version of the comments. Brackets must be placed

around all business confidential information. Comments containing

business confidential information must have a bolded heading stating

‘‘Confidential Version.’’ Attachments

considered business confidential information must have a heading stating

‘‘Business Confidential Information’’. The Committee will protect from disclosure any business confidential

information that is marked ‘‘Business Confidential Information’’ to the full extent permitted by law.

Janet E. Heinzen, Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc. 2013–12630 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING**
**COMMISSION**

**RIN 3038–AD96**

**Antidisruptive Practices Authority**

**AGENCY :**  Commodity Futures Trading

Commission.

**ACTION :**  Interpretive guidance and policy

statement.

**SUMMARY :**  The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CFTC’’) is issuing this interpretive guidance and policy statement (‘‘interpretive statement’’) to provide guidance on section 747 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform andConsumer Protection Act (the ‘‘DoddFrank Act’’), which prohibits certain disruptive trading, practices, or conduct as set forth in new section 4c(a)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the ‘‘CEA’’). This interpretive statement will provide market participants and the public with guidance on the scope and application of the statutory prohibitions set forth in CEA section 4c(a)(5).

**DATES :**  This interpretive statement will become effective May 28, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  David Meister, Director, Division of Enforcement, dmeister@cftc.gov, Vincent McGonagle, Senior Deputy Director, Division of Enforcement, vmcgonagle@cftc.gov or Robert Pease, Counsel to the Director of Enforcement,

202–418–5863, rpease@cftc.gov; Three Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Prohibition of Disruptive Practices

I. Statutory and Regulatory Authorities

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’). 1 Title VII of the
Dodd-Frank Act 2 amended the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) 3 to establish a comprehensive new regulatory framework for swaps and security-based swaps. The legislation was enacted to reduce risk, increase transparency, and promote market integrity within the financial system by doing, among other things, the following: (1) Providing for the registration and comprehensive regulation of swap dealers and major swap participants; (2) imposing clearing and trade execution requirements on standardized derivative products; (3)creating robust recordkeeping and realtime reporting regimes; and (4) enhancing the Commission’s rulemaking and enforcement authorities with respect to, among others, all registered entities and intermediaries subject to the Commission’s oversight.

Section 747 of the Dodd-Frank Act amends section 4c(a) of the CEA (‘‘Prohibited Transactions’’) to add a new section entitled ‘‘Disruptive Practices.’’ New CEA section 4c(a)(5) makes it unlawful for any person to engage in any trading, practice, or conduct on or subject to the rules of a registered entity that—(A) violates bids or offers; (B) demonstrates intentional or reckless disregard for the orderly execution of transactions during the closing period; or (C) is, is of the character of, or is commonly known to the trade as, ‘‘spoofing’’ (bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution).

Dodd-Frank Act section 747 also amends section 4c(a) of the CEA by granting the Commission authority under new section 4c(a)(6) of the CEA to promulgate such ‘‘rules and regulations as, in the judgment of the Commission, are reasonably necessary to prohibit the trading practices’’ enumerated therein ‘‘and any other trading practice that is disruptive of fair and equitable trading.’’ 4

The Commission is issuing this interpretive guidance and policy statement (‘‘interpretive statement’’) to provide market participants and the public with guidance on the manner in which it intends to apply the statutory prohibitions set forth in section 4c(a)(5) of the CEA. The public has the ability to present facts and circumstances that would inform the application of these policies.