alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Workshop on Frameworks for Developing a Safety Goal (NUREG/CP-0018)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG CP-0018 (PDF - 2.4 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** June 1981**Date Published:** June 1981

**Sponsored by:** Office of Policy Evaluation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

**Proceedings prepared by:** Brookhaven National Laboratory  Upton, NY 11973

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The "Workshop on Frameworks for Developing a Safety Goal" was designed to help in pointing to directions for narrowing safety goal options for further consideration. The topics addressed included both quantitative and qualitative elements and economic, ethical, social and political issues. It was a discussion workshop, involving invited, knowledgeable persons representing a broad range of viewpoints, drawn from technical, social and humane disciplines. The general objective of the Workshop was to develop an information base on specific topics related to the formulation of a safety goal. "Toward a Safety Goal: Discussion of Preliminary Policy Considerations" (NUREG-0764) was used as a principal basis of discussion at the Workshop, but discussion was not limited to the content or scope of that document. "An Approach to Quantitative Safety Goal" (NUREG-0739), a study prepared by the NRC's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), was used in the discussions as one example of a concrete application of concepts discussed and as a point of reference for comments.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
January 28 , 2016

ERRATUM

______________________

Appeal No. 201 5- 1415

MORTGAGE GRADER, INC
., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

FIRST CHOICE LOAN SE RVICES INC., NYLX, I NC.
, Defendants

- Appellee s

Decided: January 20, 2016 Precedential Opinion

______________________
Please make the following change:

On page 1, replace the sentence

Decided: January 20, 2015

w ith the following sentence:

Decided: January 20, 2016
No. 91-5884.

#### Towe *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1158

_____________________________
D ELTRAS L ADON J OHNSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

. February 12, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Mo ody , Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Davis-Besse Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Degradation: Overview, Lessons Learned, and NRC Actions Based on Lessons Learned (NUREG/BR-0353, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Background

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0353, Revision 1 (PDF - 2.64 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**August 2008

Office of Public Affairs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Background

The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) heads of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) have penetrations for control rod drive mechanisms (CRDMs) and instrumentation systems made from nickel-based alloys (e.g., Alloy 600) and related weld metals (Figure 1). Primary coolant and the operating conditions of PWR plants can cause cracking of these nickel-based alloys and weldments through a process called primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). In response to the detection of PWSCC at several plants, the NRC issued NRC Bulletin 2001-01, “Circumferential Cracking of Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles,” which requested information related to licensees’ programs for inspection of vessel head penetration (VHP) nozzles.

On February 16, 2002, in response to Bulletin 2001-01, the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS), located in Oak Harbor, Ohio, began a refueling outage with the intent to perform work that included remotely inspecting the VHP nozzles from underneath the head focusing on the CRDMs. The licensee found that three CRDM nozzles had indications of through-wall axial cracking. Specifically, the licensee found these indications in CRDM nozzles 1, 2, and 3, which are located near the top of the RPV head.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Loan
Agreement

     

    Lender:  YU  Anming

     

    Borrower:  Shanghai
Vomart Auto Parts Co.,  Ltd.,  Nanjing Branch

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              1

            	
              Loan
      amount: RMB 477,220.  This loan is
  interest-free.

            


    

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              2

            	
              Term
      of Repayment: the loan amount shall be paid off within two years from the
      date of signing this Agreement.

            


    

     

    This
Agreement shall take effect after being signed or sealed by both parties. It
shall expire automatically upon being paid off by the borrower.

     

    This
Agreement is in duplicate. One for the lender and one for the
borrower.

     

    
      
        	
                Lender
      (seal): YU  Anming

              	
                Borrower
      (seal):

              	
                Shanghai
      Vomart Auto Parts Co. Ltd.,

                Nanjing
      Branch

              
	 
      	 
      
	
                Date:
      May 1, 2009

              	
                Date:
      May 1, 2009
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: May 5, 2009
#### Thomas R. Van Neil, Respondent, v Joseph H. Berger et al., Appellants.

[632 NYS2d 48]

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted in part and third cause of action dismissed. Memorandum: A cause of action for fraud or misrepresentation must state in detail the circumstances constituting the wrong (CPLR 3016 [b]). A cause of action for fraud is not stated where the only fraud alleged relates to a breach of contract *(Sparka Travel v Hamza,*182 AD2d 1067,1067-1068). Because plaintiff s third cause of action neither alleges a breach of a duty distinct from the contractual duty between the parties, nor states specific claims of fraud or misrepresentation, Supreme Court should have dismissed it *(see, Edwil Indus. v Stroba Instruments Corp.,*131 AD2d 425). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J. — Dismiss Cause of Action.) Present — Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard P. Powers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corgentech Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006



/s/    RICHARD P.
POWERS Richard P. Powers Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             620
<SECURITIES>                                     6,748
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                       221
<INVENTORY>                                        685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,432
<PP&E>                                           1,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                     929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,271
<SALES>                                          1,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,887
<CGS>                                              673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,412
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

COT'N WASH INC., BIG 3 PACKAGING LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

SUN PRODUCTS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2014-1805

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00651-SLR, Judge Sue 

L. Robinson.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STEVEN MOLO, MoloLamken LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by BENOIT 

QUARMBY; ERIC RICHARD NITZ, ROBERT KELSEY KRY, 

Washington, DC. 

ERROL TAYLOR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 

LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by FREDRICK ZULLOW, ANNA BROOK.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 June 4, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27951]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 775 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-473, K2025-470.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27951 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (333-110292) and S-8(No.’s 333-98911, 333-84676, 333-84678) of Mykrolis Corporation of our report dated February 25, 2004 except for Note 20, as to which the date is March 5, 2004 relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements and financialstatement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 15, 2004
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment. Pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 
                    *et seq.*), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of these firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm's workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. List of Petitions Received by Eda for Certification Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[12/29/2014 through 1/20/2015]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for 
                             investigation
Product(s)Linemaster Switch Corporation
29 Plaine Hill Road, Woodstock, CT 06281

The firm manufactures electronic and mechanical foot controls, replacement parts and accessories.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: January 20, 2015. Michael S. DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner.


[FR Doc. 2015-01266 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-24-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Ties, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                       /s/ Mark E. Ties
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Mark E. Ties
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       February 10, 2004
exhibit10-5_1.htm




TORTOISE CAPITAL RESOURCES CORPORATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CUSTODY AGREEMENT 


 


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT dated as of the 24th day of May, 2010, to the Custody Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2005 (the "Agreement"), is entered into by and between TORTOISE CAPITAL RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation (the "Company” or “Fund”) and U.S. BANK, N.A., a national banking association (the "Custodian"). 


 


RECITALS 


 


WHEREAS, the parties have entered into the Agreement; and 


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Custodian desire to amend the fees of the Agreement; and 


 


WHEREAS, Article XIV, Section 14.4 of the Agreement allows for its amendment by a written instrument executed by both parties. 


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 


 


Exhibit C of the Agreement is hereby superseded and replaced with Amended Exhibit C attached hereto. 


 


Except to the extent amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


 


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more counterparts as of the date and year first written above. 


 



	TORTOISE CAPITAL RESOURCES CORPORATION	      	U.S. BANK, N.A.
	  	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:  	 
	 	 	 
	Name:  	 	 	Name: Michael R. McVoy
	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 	Title: Vice President







1


 





 






Amended Exhibit C 


 


to the Custody Agreement – Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation


 


 



	
DOMESTIC CUSTODY SERVICES

ANNUAL FEE SCHEDULE effective May 1, 2010 


	


Annual fee based upon market value per fund:

..4 basis points

 


 


Portfolio Transaction Fees

$ 7.50 per disbursement wire 

$ 5.50 per incoming wire

$ 5.50 per US Bank repurchase agreement transaction

$ 4.00 per book entry security (depository or Federal Reserve system) and non-US Bank repurchase agrmt

$30.00 per portfolio transaction processed through our New York custodian definitive security (physical)

$ 4.00 per principal paydown

$ 8.00 per option/future contract written, exercised or expired

$50.00 per Cedel/Euroclear transaction

$15.00 per mutual fund trade

$15.00 per margin variation Fed wire

$ 6.00 per short sale

$150.00 per segregated account per year 


 


A transaction is a purchase/sale of a security, free receipt/free delivery, maturity, tender or exchange. 


 


No charge for the initial conversion free receipt. 


 


Overdrafts – charged to the account at prime interest rate plus 2. 


 


Plus out-of-pocket expenses, and extraordinary expenses based upon complexity, including items such as shipping fees or transfer fees. 


 


Fees are billed monthly. 







 


2