alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015037EN.01002401.xml

| 13.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 37/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 37/24

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 1351/2014 of 18 December 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 365 of 19 December 2014
  )

Page 48, point (2) of Article 1, new Article 2d(4):

for:

‘4.   The prohibitions in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to the execution of an obligation arising from a contract or an ancillary contract concluded before 20 December 2014, or ...’

read:

‘4.   The prohibitions in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to the execution until 21 March 2015 of an obligation arising from a contract or an ancillary contract concluded before 20 December 2014, or ...’

---
No. 82-5858.

#### Tarr *v.*Maggio, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Makes Available Staff Recommendations for Proposed Rule on Certain Uranium and Plutonium Facilities

----

----

No. 99-115 June 2, 1999

**NRC MAKES AVAILABLE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPOSED RULE ON CERTAIN URANIUM AND PLUTONIUM FACILITIES**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making available for public information staff recommendations for draft revised regulations for some licensed facilities that possess and process large quantities of certain types of uranium and plutonium.

As envisioned by the staff, the regulations (Part 70) would apply to licensees that are authorized to possess a "critical mass" of "special nuclear material" and that are engaged in one of the following activities:

-- Enriched uranium processing,

-- Fabrication of uranium fuel or fuel assemblies,

-- Uranium enrichment,

-- Enriched uranium hexafluoride conversion,

-- Plutonium processing,

-- Fabrication of mixed-oxide fuel or fuel assemblies,

-- Scrap recovery of special nuclear material, or

-- Any other activity involving a critical mass of special nuclear material that the Commission determines could significantly affect public health and safety.

The Commission is presently reviewing these recommendations. It has not yet approved publication of a proposed rule.

The Commission plans to hold a public meeting June 14 at 2:00 p.m. in the Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, to discuss the subject.

The Commission is making the staff recommendations available now to enable all stakeholders to have preliminary access to the document. Once the Commission approves a proposed rule, it will be published in the Federal Register for formal public comment and announced in a press release.

Interested persons may obtain a copy of the staff recommendations from the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone: 202/634-3273.

A copy of the recommendations may also be obtained electronically as document 042-113 at the following Website address: http://techconf.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/library?source=*&library=dom_lic_lib.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6266
JESSIE L. CREDLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-754-2) Submitted: June 4, 1996 Decided: June 19, 1996 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessie L. Credle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted an appeal from a magistrate judge's report and recommendat ion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the report is not an appealable order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60089 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY LEE QUINN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95-CR-83-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - October 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Lee Quinn appeals his jury conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and the 120-month sentence imposed by the district court. Quinn argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that theNo. 96-60089 - 2 - evidence presented at the trial established Quinn was guilty of the firearm offense beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Resio-Trejo , 45 F.3d 907, 910 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Martinez , 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 943 (1993). Quinn argues that the district court clearly erred in finding that he obstructed justice and in imposing a two-level increase in his offense level pursuant to § 3C1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Because Quinn did not present any rebuttal evidence to refute the facts set forth in the Presentence Report (PSR) concerning the obstruction of justice enhancement, the district court did not clearly err in adopting the facts in the PSR and increasing Quinn’s offense level for obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1 of the Guidelines. See United States v. Sherbak , 950 F.2d 1095, 1099-1100 (5th Cir. 1992). Quinn argues that the district court clearly erred in finding that the firearm was stolen and in increasing his offense level under § 2K2.1(b)(4) of the Guidelines. Because Quinn did not present rebuttal evidence to refute the facts in the PSR concerning whether the firearm was stolen, the district court did not clearly err in adopting the facts in the PSR and increasing Quinn’s offense level because the firearm was stolen pursuant to § 2K2.1(b)(4) of the Guidelines. See Sherbak , 950 F.2d at 1099- 1100.No. 96-60089 - 3 -
AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs 25 CFR Part 256
[K00103 12/13 A3A10; 134D0102DR-DS5A300000-DR.5A311.IA000113; BIA-2014-0004]
RIN 1076-AF22
 AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
 ACTION: Proposed rule; correction; tribal consultation session information.
 SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) published a proposed rule in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         of January 2, 2015, announcing proposed revisions to update the Housing Improvement Program. This document provides updates to the dates and locations of tribal consultation sessions.
 DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by March 6, 2015. See  the 
                        **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**
                         section of this document for dates of tribal consultation sessions.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of 
                        ( print page 4521)
                        Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680; 
                        *elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Tribal consultation sessions on the proposed rule published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of January 2, 2015 (80 FR 13) will be held at the following dates and locations: Date
Time
LocationTuesday, February 3, 2015, *NOTE: The session will be held February 3, not February 4.
1 p.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time)
(in conjunction with the National American Indian Housing Council legislative conference), Mayflower Renaissance Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20036.Wednesday, February 11, 2015
1 p.m.- 5 p.m.  (Alaska Standard Time)
Frontier Building, 3601 C Street, Room 896, Anchorage, AK 99503.Wednesday, February 18, 2015
1 p.m.- 4 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time)
Teleconference Call-In Number: (888) 455-0045;  passcode 1185469.Thursday, February 26, 2015
1 p.m.-5 p.m.  (Eastern Standard Time)
(following the National Congress of American Indian Executive Council Winter Session), Capital Hilton, Room Federal A, 1001 16th Street NW., Washington, DC 20036.
 These dates supersede the dates listed in the January 2, 2015, 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Please visit the following Web site for additional updates: 
                    *http://www.bia.gov/​WhoWeAre/​AS-IA/​ORM/​HIP/​index.htm.* Dated: January 14, 2015. Kevin K. Washburn, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.


[FR Doc. 2015-01582 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 12, 2017

Order 

Clerk

May 12, 2017

153413(83)

NEXTEER AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153413

v COA: 324463

Saginaw CC: 13-021401-CK

MANDO AMERICA CORPORATION, TONY

DODAK, THEODORE G. SEEGER, TOMY

SEBASTIAN, CHRISTIAN ROSS, KEVIN

ROSS, ABRAHAM GEBREGERIS,

RAMAKRISHNAN RAJA

VENKITASUBRAMONY, TROY STRIETER,

JEREMY J. WARMBIER, and SCOTT

WENDLING,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 31, 

2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.

WILDER, J., took no part in this decision.
#### In re F. A. POTTS & COMPANY. G.M.P. LAND COMPANY v. Frederick A. LARK, et al.

Civ. A. Nos. 82-1615, 82-1616.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April 19, 1982.

*664Horace A. Stern, Wexler, Weisman, For-man & Shapiro, Philadelphia, Pa., for appel-lees.

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Appellees move to dismiss these bankruptcy appeals for lack of appellate jurisdiction. For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied.

Appellees contend that this court lacks jurisdiction because the notices of appeal are untimely. The order appealed from was announced orally on March 1, 1982. Notices of appeal were filed on March 9th. The bankruptcy court entered its written order on March 15th. Appellees point out that a judgment must be set forth on a separate document. Bankruptcy Rule 921(a); *see*Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 58. They argue therefore that no appealable judgment existed until March 15th, and that no notice of appeal was filed “within 10 days of the date of the entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” Bankruptcy Rule 802(a).

I agree that no appealable order existed prior to March 15th. *See, e.g., Gregson & Associates Architects v. Virgin Islands,*675 F.2d 589 at 591-93 (3d Cir. 1982). I note, however, that “a notice of appeal filed after the announcement of a decision or order but before the entry of the judgment or order shall be treated as filed after such entry and on the day thereof.” Fed.R.App.Pro. 4(a)(2). Although the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure do not in terms apply to appeals to the district court, *see*Fed.R.App. Pro. 1(a), the principles that they codify should be used for guidance when the Bankruptcy Rules are silent. Rule 4(a)(2) “recognize[s] the practice,” previously recognized in criminal cases, *see id.*4(b), “designed to avoid the loss of the right to appeal by filing the notice of appeal prematurely.” *Id.*4(a)(2) advisory committee note of 1979, *reprinted in, e.g.,*9 J. Moore, B. Ward & J. D. Lucas, *Moores’ Federal Practice*¶ 204.01[4], at 4-9 (2d ed. 1982); *see, e.g., Hodge v. Hodge,*507 F.2d 87, 89 (3d Cir. 1975) (appellate court should hear appeal prematurely noticed, “[s]o long as the order is an appealable one and the non-appealing party is not prejudiced by the prematurity”); 15 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. Cooper, *Federal Practice & Procedure*§ 3915, at 599-600 (1976 & Supp.1982); 16 *id.*§ 3950 (Supp.1982).

No reason exists in this case for ignoring the principle of Fed.R.App.Pro. 4(a)(2).1 Therefore, the notices of appeal are deemed filed on March 15th, after the filing of the order. Thus, the appeals are timely, and the motion is denied.

1

. Appellee cites cases dealing with the need for a separately documented written order. These cases are inapposite because such an order exists here.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC to Hold Press Briefing on Decommissioning of Maine Yankee

----

----

I-97-126

September 23, 1997

NRC TO HOLD PRESS BRIEFING ON DECOMMISSIONING OF MAINE YANKEE

Officials from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a press briefing on Tuesday, September 30, regarding the decommissioning of the Maine Yankee nuclear power plant. The briefing will begin at 2 p.m. in the corporate office building in Brunswick, Maine.

Among the topics will be NRC regulations for decommissioning a nuclear power plant, agency oversight provided during such work and issues specific to the shutdown and dismantlement of Maine Yankee.

The press briefing will be a prelude to an October 7 public meeting regarding the Maine Yankee decommissioning process. That session will begin at 7 p.m. at the Wiscasset Middle School.

In early August, the plant's owners voted to permanently close the 810-megawatt reactor. Later that month, the plant submitted to the NRC, as required, a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report. It calls for major decommissioning activities at the plant to be completed approximately three and a half years after the cessation of operations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### SERVED: AUGUST 20, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE**MATT~R** OF

.**-·-~]** SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKET NO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0868
NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

### 17 

### 2: Db

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM060073) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Counsel Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 

### ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLaw Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (EU-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0868 (Civil Penalty Action)



# ..

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01244]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Board of Directors Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Board of Directors meeting.

DATES: Friday, January 23, 2015 (10 a.m.-4 p.m.).

ADDRESSES: 2301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denson Staples, Assistant to the Board 
Liaison, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7115020510011d140231040218015f1e0316"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690d1a1d0819050c1a291c1a001947061b0e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Status: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection 
(c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.
    Agenda: January 23, 2015 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the 
One Hundred Fifty-Third Meeting (October 20, 2014) of the Board of 
Directors; Welcome New President Nancy Lindborg; Chairman's Report; 
Acting President's Report; Strategic Plan Evaluation Update; Impact 
Initiative; Project Updates; Other General Issues.

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Michael Graham,
Senior Vice President for Management and Chief Financial Officer, 
United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 2015-01244 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 86-5825.

#### Francis *v.*Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 92 ) IV-C-5

8 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 92 of 232P. 2 

# 0-87-^: 1

* ' A \ UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIONAGENC Y | KMT > 5 UNITE D STATE S bI NV 1K.UP

IOTILli I AI Jrn. u i | \Vp^

- " WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Joe l Hefle y Unite d State s Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Hefley : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Januar y21 , 198 8 lette r relayin g th e concern s o f you r constituent , Mr . JayCimino , regardin g EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refuelin g emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hyou r response , I hav e enclose d a copyo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposin g onboar d controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f th e Standard s Developmen t an

d Suppor t Branc ho f th e Emissio n Contro l TechnologyDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , Ann Arbor , Michiga n 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Thank yo u fo r you r letter . W e wil l plac e th e lette r fro mMr . Cimin o i n ou r publi c docke t an d full yconside r hi s comment s i n th e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemakin g process . Sincerel yyours , 

### f » L SJT

O B Y' Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic eo f Mobil eSource s Enclosur e c c : Docke tA-87-1 1 bcc : Regio n0 8 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n Prepare dby : FormLetter:sal:2/l/88:AL8806 5 - ECTD , AnnArbor , M I
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Note to Editors: Discussion on Recent Event at Haddam Neck

----

----

I-98-89

July 30, 1998

**NOTE TO EDITORS:**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company on Monday afternoon, August 3, to discuss a recent event during the reactor system decontamination at the Haddam Neck nuclear plant in Haddam, Conn.

The event involved a spill of approximately 1,000 gallons of water and chemical agents used for decontamination onto the floor of the Primary Auxiliary Building and into the floor drain system. The company will discuss the root causes of the event, the corrective actions it has taken, and its readiness to proceed with the next phase of the decontamination of the permanently shutdown facility.

The meeting at the Connecticut Yankee Energy Information Center, 362 Injun Hollow Road in East Hampton, Conn., begins at 2:00 p.m. It is open to the public for observation.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# General Says U.S.-South Korea Alliance Is Ironclad

By  xxxDAVID VERGUNDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 82-5913.

#### Dillard *v.*Wayne County Prosecutor.

Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.