alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Simulation of PKL Loss of RHRS Experiment E3.1 with RELAP5 and TRACE Codes – Application to a PWR NPP Model (NUREG/IA-0256)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0256 (PDF - 741.69 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 2011**Date Published:** September 2011

**Prepared by:** César Queral1, Alberto Concejal1, Antonio Expósito1, and Issac González1,

1 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Alenza 4. 28003 Madrid SPAIN

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An analysis of PKL midloop test E3,1 has been performed with TRACE and RELAP5/MOD3 codes. This test, included within the OECD/PKL project, tries to analyze the phenomenology and different accident management actions after a loss of RHRS at midloop conditions with primary side closed. The comparison between the results obtained with both codes shows that, in general, the main phenomena are well reproduced. However, there are still a few phenomena that are not well predicted, like pressurizer level. The good results obtained simulating another similar test (PKL test F2.2 run2) enables to confirm that the modelling methodology is adequate for this kind of transients. This modelling methodology has been also applied to a TRACE model of a Spanish PWR, Westinghouse design, simulating a similar transient to test E3.1, obtaining similar results than in PKL models.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Staff Issues Letters to Commonwealth Edison Co. on Actions to Be Taken Prior to Startup of Zion and LaSalle Nuclear Plants

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-39

April 17, 1997

CONTACT:

Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

**NRC STAFF ISSUES LETTERS TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. ON ACTIONSTO BE TAKEN PRIOR TO STARTUP OF ZION AND LASALLE NUCLEAR PLANTS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued Confirmatory Action Letters to Commonwealth Edison Company on the utility's commitments to submit its plans to address performance deficiencies at the LaSalle and Zion Nuclear Power Stations and to meet with the NRC staff prior to resuming operations of the two plants.

The two-unit LaSalle Station is near Seneca, Illinois, and the two-unit Zion Station is at Zion, Illinois.

The letters document the utility's agreement to:
        -  Develop plans to address corrective actions for the various performance deficiencies at Zion and LaSalle and submit the plans to the NRC. The plans will include the utility's criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the corrective actions. 
        -  Keep the NRC staff informed to the projected startup dates for the two plants. 
        -  Meet with the NRC periodically to discuss the status of the corrective action plans. 
        -  Meet with the NRC following the completion of the evaluation and training programs for reactor operators at the two plants to discuss the results of the training activities. 
        -  Meet with the NRC to discuss the readiness of the initial unit at each site to resume operations once the utility has determined that the unit is ready for restart. 

The meetings between the NRC staff and the utility will be open to public observation.

The LaSalle units have been shut down since last September. Unit 2 was shut down for refueling, and Unit 1 shut down for mainteance.

Zion Unit 2 was also shut down for refueling in September of last year. Unit 1 was shut down February 21 because of an inoperable safety system pump.

The two plants were put on the NRC's "Watch List" in January because of declining performance.

Copies of the two Confirmatory Action letters are available from the Region III Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC's internet web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Washington Bancorp
Computation of Earnings per Common
Share

Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
                                                   For the three months ended March 31,    For the nine months ended March 31,
                                                   ------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
                                                    2002      2001      2002     2001      2002      2001       2002     2001
                                                    Basic     Basic    Diluted  Diluted    Basic     Basic    Diluted   Diluted
                                                     EPS       EPS       EPS      EPS       EPS       EPS       EPS       EPS
                                                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>      <C>      <C>        <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Computation of weighted average
  number of common shares
  outstanding:

Common shares outstanding
  at the beginning of the period ..............    651,133   651,133    651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133   651,133     651,133
Unreleased common shares held by the
  Employee Stock Ownership
  Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
  of the period ...............................    (24,880)  (30,848)   (24,880)  (30,848)  (26,195)  (33,283)  (26,195)    (33,283)
Weighted average common shares
  released by the ESOP during
  the period ..................................        710       657        710       657     2,024      1,875     2,024      1,875
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding - Stock Option Plan .............        - -       - -     13,067     8,173       - -        - -    12,238      7,013
Weighted average common shares
  into treasury ...............................    (143,895) (136,162) (143,895) (136,162) (138,659)  (121,903) (138,959)  (121,903)
                                                  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total average shares outstanding ..............     483,068   484,780   496,135   492,953   488,303    497,822   500,541    504,835
                                                  =================================================================================

Net income ....................................   $ 205,414  $281,808  $205,414  $281,808  $833,085   $785,215  $833,085   $785,215
                                                  =================================================================================

Net income per share ..........................   $    0.43  $   0.58  $   0.41  $   0.57  $   1.71   $   1.58  $   1.66   $   1.56
                                                  =================================================================================

                                        1
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Economic Analysis


Meeting of Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economics and Statistics 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 
as amended by Pub. L. 94-409, Pub. L. 96-523, Pub. L. 97-375 and Pub. 
L. 105-153), we are announcing a meeting of the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting will address ways in which the 
national economic accounts can be presented more effectively for 
current economic analysis and recent statistical developments in 
national accounting.

DATES: Friday, May 8, the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn 
at 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis at 1441 L St. NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gianna Marrone, Program Analyst, 
Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9633.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. Because 
of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must 
contact Gianna Marrone of BEA at (202) 606-9633 in advance. The meeting 
is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for 
foreign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to Gianna Marrone at (202) 606-9633.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established September 2, 
1999. The Committee advises the Director of BEA on matters related to 
the development and improvement of BEA's national, regional, industry, 
and international economic accounts, especially in areas of new and 
rapidly growing economic activities arising from innovative and 
advancing technologies, and provides recommendations from the 
perspectives of the economics profession, business, and government. 
This will be the Committee's twenty-eighth meeting.

    Dated: January 7, 2015.
Brian C. Moyer,
Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2015-00900 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

(as of April 21, 2009)



|                                                  |  |                                     
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|NAME OF ENTITY                                    |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION       
|Chunghwa International Yellow Pages Co., Ltd.     |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Chunghwa System Integration Co., Ltd.             |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Light Era Development Co., Ltd.                   |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Chief Telecom Inc.                                |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Spring House Entertainment Inc.                   |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Senao International Co., Ltd.                     |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|Unigate Telecom Inc.                              |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|InfoExplorer Co., Ltd.                            |  | Taiwan, R.O.C.                      
|                                                  | 
|New Prospect Investments Holdings Ltd.            |  | British Virgin Islands              
|                                                  | 
|Prime Asia Investments Group Ltd.                 |  | British Virgin Islands              
|                                                  | 
|Concord Technology Co., Ltd.                      |  | Brunei                              
|                                                  | 
|Chief Telecom (Hong Kong) Limited                 |  | Hong Kong                           
|                                                  | 
|Donghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.                         |  | Hong Kong                           
|                                                  | 
|Chunghwa Telecom Japan Co., Ltd.                  |  | Japan                               
|                                                  | 
|Chief International Corp.                         |  | Samoa Islands                       
|                                                  | 
|Glory Network System Service (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |  | Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
|                                                  | 
|Chunghwa Telecom Singapore Pte, Ltd.              |  | Singapore                           
|                                                  | 
|Chunghwa Telecom Global, Inc.                     |  | United States of America
44 F. (2d) 859

#### In re Royce L. Beers

(No. 2558)

*731United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,

December 1, 1930

*Whittemore, Hulbert, Whittemore & Belknap (Lawrence J. Whittemore*and *William H. Gross*of counsel) for appellant.

*T.*A. *Hostetler (Howard S. Miller*of counsel) for the Commissioner of Patents. .

[Oral argument November 20, 1930, Mr. Gross and Mr. Miller]

Before Geaham, Presiding Judge, and Bland, Hattteld, Gakbett, and Leneoot, Associate Judges

Bland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an ex parte appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, refusing to allow claims 3 to 8, inclusive, upon the construction of a stoker or fuel feeding device. Claim 3, which is illustrative, reads as follows:

> 3. In a stoker, the combination with a retort, and an ash receiver spaced laterally therefrom, of a flooring for fuel between said retort and ash receiver, including a tuySre bar, an imperforate part and means for removably supporting each floor portion independently of the other.

The references relied upon are:

> Blackburn et al., 1326906, January 6, 1920.

> Skelly, 1522918, January 13, 1925.

> Helander (Swedish), 45889, May 19, 1917. •

Appellant has provided, as part of the fuel bed' of the stoker, tuyere bars and dead plates formed separately and mounted independently, and it is claimed that the advantage of his claimed invention chiefly rests in the facility of the removing of the parts.

The sole question in the case is whether or not the references anticipated appellant’s claimed invention.

It is not necessary for us to discuss all the references. They are discussed in the opinion of the board, and we think aptly. It is at once apparent that in Helander, *supra,*substantially the same parts are made in one piece, which can be removed. It is held that constructing the same element in two parts, in view of the disclosures of Blackburn, *supra,*and Skelly, *supra,*does not constitute invention. ;.

We agree with the decision of the Board of Appeals and the same is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                                       11
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER

                                  CWMBS, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2001-1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-1


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicers
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR


                                      12
_____________ No. 95-4016SI

_____________ John Barry Davis, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Thomas E. Hundley, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: May 17, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. John Barry Davis appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Davis contends the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions for burglary and theft. He also contends his trial counse l provid ed ineffective assistance. Discussion of the issues presented by this appeal will serve no useful purpose. We have carefully considere d Davis's contentions and find them to be without merit. We thus affir m Davis's convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Nuclear Regulatory Authority Experimental Program to Characterize and Understand High Energy Arcing Fault (HEAF) Phenomena (NUREG/IA-0470)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 01, 2021
#### OTHO *V.*POOL v. J. B. TREXLER and wife.

*Braining Wet Lands*— *Constitutionality of Aet.*

The Act concerning “Draining wet lands” (Battle’s Revisal, Ch. 39) is constitutional.

(Bynum, J. *Dissenting.)*

*{Brown*v. *Keener,*74 N. 0. 714, cited and approved )

This was a PROCEEDING under the Act concerning “Draining Wet Lands” (Bat. Rev. ch. 39.) heard at Pali Term,. 1876, of Rowan Superior Court, before *Cloud, J.*

The action was instituted before the County Commissioners and brought by appeal to the Superior Court.

The defendant insisted that said Aet authorizing the assessment, &c. was unconstitutional, in that; private property was taken for private uses without compensation to the owner thereof.

His Honor sustained the position taken by defendant and gave judgment accordingly. Appeal by plaintiff.

*Mr. J. E.*Kerr, for plaintiff.

, *Mr. J. M. MeCorkle,*for defendant.

Pearson, C. J.

Every citizen holds his land subservient' to such “police regulations” as the General Assembly may in its wisdom enact in order to promote the general welfare. *Brown*v. *Keener,*74 N. C. 714.

I take this proposition to be settled and will not attempt to make “a rehash” of the cases set out by Cooley, ch. 16,. “Constitutional Limitations.”

If the General Assembly has power to make regulations for draining a swamp containing 10,000 acres it has the same *298power in regard to a swamp containing 1,000 acres. So of 100 acres, so of 1 acre.

There is no distinction in the principle; the only differ•ence is in regard to the degree.

We declare our opinion to be that the police power of the General Assembly authorized it to pass the Act under which this action is brought, to-wit; the Act entitled “Draining wet lands.” Bat. Rev. ch. 39.

It is said the General Assembly has no power to take one acre of the land of A and give it to B, on the ground that B is the better farmer of the two and will make the one acre produce more. That proposition is granted except when “the power of eminent domain” is exerted for public purposes ; as when land is taken for a railroad. These two powers “eminent domain” and “police regulations” are distinct .and yet they are frequently confounded. By the one, the property of A is given to B. By the other, the property of A is left in him, but is made subservient to the general welfare. “Cart ways,” Bat. Rev. ch. 104, § 38, furnishes an .analogy. Under the power to make “police regulations” the land of A is made subservient to the land of B for the purposes of a road. After some contestation the question of the power of the General Assembly was yielded. So in our ■case the power of the General Assembly to make the land of A ■•subservient to the land of B for the purpose of drainage must also be yielded upon the authorities and upon the reason of the Bring.

Error.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed, and *procedendo.*
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Indian Point 2 Safety Assessment to Be Discussed on May 27

----

----

I-98-59

May 20, 1998

**INDIAN POINT 2 SAFETY ASSESSMENT TO BE DISCUSSED ON MAY 27**

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission meeting to discuss the results of a safety assessment of the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant -- performed by an independent team hired by the unit's owner -- will be held on Wednesday, May 27, at the Buchanan, N.Y., facility.

Scheduled to begin at 2 p.m., the session will take place in the Energy Education Center and will be open to the public for observation.

Consolidated Edison Company of New York operates Indian Point 2. The utility shut down the pressurized-water reactor last October after experiencing recurring problems with safety-related electrical breakers.

Earlier this year, the NRC expressed concern about equipment problems and weaknesses in human performance and plant processes at Indian Point 2. Con Ed subsequently informed the agency that in response to the NRC's desire for an Operational Safety Team Inspection at the site, it would conduct its own comprehensive review, called an Independent Safety Assessment (ISA). This review, involving a team of a dozen independent evaluators performing two weeks of on-site observation, was designed to provide a better understanding of the extent of problems and weaknesses at the facility.

A report summarizing the ISA's findings was submitted to the NRC on May 4.

At the meeting on May 27, Con Ed will present its planned corrective actions in response to the results of the ISA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Navy Provides Medical Care to Sailors of USS Kidd, Disinfects Ship

Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News