alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# IJS Procedure for Converting Input Deck from RELAP5 to TRACE (NUREG/IA-0408)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0408 (PDF - 8.84 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2012**Date Published:** October 2012

**Prepared by:** A. Prošek, O.A. Berar, B. Mavko

Jožef Stefan Institute Jamova cesta 39 SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

A. Calvo, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Much of efforts have been done in the past to develop the RELAP5 input decks. The purpose of this study is to present the RELAP5 to TRACE conversion procedure, developed at Institut “Jožef Stefan” (IJS). For demonstrating the conversion procedure the ACHILLES and BETHSY input decks (IJS legacy) were used using SNAP. The RELAP5 input decks of ACHILLES rig and BETHSY facility were developed in the frame of participation to international standard problem no. 25 (ISP-25) and international standard problem no. 27 (ISP-27). These RELAP5 legacy input decks were used for demonstration of the developed IJS conversion methodology, consisting of eleven steps. Besides demonstration of the methodology also the comparison between RELAP5 and TRACE has been done. It can be concluded that calculated results obtained by TRACE are as good as the results by RELAP5, thus suggesting that IJS conversion procedure may be used for conversion of separate and integral effect test legacy RELAP5 input decks to TRACE input decks.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Jean
      Wilson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of XA,
      Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      XA,
      Inc.





*By:/s/
      Jean Wilson*


Jean
      Wilson


Principal
      Financial Officer





March
      30,
      2007
# L_2014283EN.01003101.xml

| 27.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/31

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1020/2014

of 25 September 2014

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Българско розово масло (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria's application to register the name ‘Българско розово масло’ (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo), was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria's application to register the name ‘Българско розово масло’ (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo), was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Българско розово масло’ (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Българско розово масло’ (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Българско розово масло’ (Bulgarsko rozovo maslo) (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.10 essential oils, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Neven MIMICA

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 122, 25.4.2014, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1334 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require U.S. Immigration 

and Customs Enforcement, upon the request of a law enforcement official, to make a prompt determination of whether to issue a detainer 

in the case of an alien arrested for a violation of Federal, State, or 

local law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BROOKS of 

Alabama, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. 

ROHRABACHER, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, 

Mr. ROUZER, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. OLSON, Mr. 

DESJARLAIS, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BABIN, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. YOHO, and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, upon the 

request of a law enforcement official, to make a prompt 

determination of whether to issue a detainer in the case 

of an alien arrested for a violation of Federal, State, 

or local law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1334 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assuring Law Enforce3 ment Requests Are Timely Evaluated by the Department 

4 of Homeland Security Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘ALERTED 

5 Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF ISSUANCE OF DETAINER. 

7 Section 287(d) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(d)) is amended in the matter pre9 ceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘relating to controlled 

10 substances’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Gerena, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 733]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered June 13, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and petit larceny, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 6 to 12 years imprisonment for buglary in the second degree, to run concurrently with an indeterminate term of *31!z*to 7 years imprisonment for sexual abuse in the first degree, and concurrently with the determinate term of 1 year imprisonment for petit larceny.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reduc*735ing the sentence imposed for buglary in the second degree to an indeterminate term of 4 to 8 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

At the plea proceeding on April 15, 1994, the court made a "conditional” promise to the defendant of an indeterminate term of 4 to 8 years imprisonment on the conviction of burglary in the second degree. The court, however, did not set forth any specific conditions of its sentencing promise. At the sentencing proceeding, the court refused to keep its promise, solely on the basis that the defendant professed his innocence of the charged crimes to the probation officer who prepared his presentence report. Even if the defendant asserted his innocence, as alleged, this fact alone does not warrant additional punishment. Therefore, the court improvidently exercised its discretion in imposing the enhanced sentence *(see, e.g., People v Stennett,*207 AD2d 847; *People v Raffaele,*199 AD2d 545; *People v Daniels,*132 AD2d 667; *People v Brunson,*131 AD2d 689). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 120 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palisades Docket (050- 00255)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content G - Engineering G - Design 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical T - Testing 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 

519

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 146 - Evaluation LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 148 - Action not yet started or untimely Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 148 - Action not yet started or untimely Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 148 - Action not yet started or untimely Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 

623

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical T - Testing 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 191 - Team interactions LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 121 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palisades Docket (050- 00255)

Work Planning & Practices / IR194 - Housekeeping LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

1454

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 26
No: I-19-019 July 15, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC Schedules Public Meeting for Comments on

Decommissioning Report for Three Mile Island 1 Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on July 23 in 

Harrisburg, Pa., to discuss the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report, or PSDAR, for 

the Three Mile Island 1 nuclear power plant. The public will have an opportunity to offer comments 

at the meeting.

The meeting will be held from 6-9 p.m. at the Sheraton Harrisburg Hershey Hotel, 

4650 Lindle Road, Harrisburg, Pa.

TMI 1 is a pressurized-water reactor in Londonderry Township (Dauphin County), Pa. 

Exelon, on June 20, 2017, notified the NRC that it intends to permanently close the plant no later 

than Sept. 30, 2019.

Exelon submitted the PSDAR for TMI 1 to the NRC on April 5, 2019. Written comments on 

the report can be submitted using Docket ID NRC-2019-0142 on the Regulations.gov website. 

Comments can also be submitted, using the Docket ID, via mail to: Office of Administration, Mail 

Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, 

ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.

The deadline for submitting comments on the report is Oct. 9, 2019.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-327-LR and 50-238-LR; ASLBP No. 13-927-01-LR-BD01]


Tennessee Valley Authority (Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 
2)

Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board in the above-captioned Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 
and 2 license renewal proceeding is hereby reconstituted by appointing 
Administrative Judge Paul S. Ryerson to serve as Chairman in place of 
Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin, and by appointing Administrative 
Judge Michael F. Kennedy to serve in place of Administrative Judge Paul 
B. Abramson.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue 
to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 
et seq.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of January 2015.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-01179 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00206-CR

Joel ALEJANDREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-CR-101

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted court reporter Dora Canizales’s first and second motions for extension 

of time to file the reporter’s record, we set the record due on October 3, 2019. See TEX. R. APP.

R. 35.3(c). After the twice-extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an 

extension of time to file the record until November 3, 2019, accompanied by a status report. The 

status report does not provide the information required by our September 9, 2019 order.

Nevertheless, the reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed 

with this court by November 4, 2019. See id.

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by November 4, 2019, any 

further request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written 

status report that provides the information specified below. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form. 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
___________________________________

Patricia Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL PARGA-ROSAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-76592

Agency No. A035-001-589

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Raul Parga-Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in

FILED

MAR 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KS/Research 2 05-76592

absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse

of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions of law.

Garcia v. INS, 222 F.3d 1208, 1209 (9th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). We deny the

petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Parga-Rosas’ motion to

reopen because the record reflects that notice of the February 3, 2005, hearing was

mailed to the address of record of Parga-Rosas’ counsel. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229(a)(2)(A) (notice may be served by mail on alien or alien’s counsel of

record); see also Garcia, 222 F.3d at 1209 (notice to counsel of record constitutes

notice to alien); Farhoud v. INS, 122 F.3d 794, 796 (9th Cir. 1997) (actual receipt

of notice by alien not required to satisfy due process).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
No. 90-6273.

#### Gibson *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Submitted on record and Briefs November 28,

affirmed without opinion December 3, 1973,

petition for rehearing denied January 3, petition for review denied February 20, 1974

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*WILLIAM WILFRED KRIEGER (No. 29420), *Appellant.*

516 P2d 92

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, for appellant.

Lee Johnson, Attorney General, W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foret and Thornton, Judges.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRACY ALLEN CALLIHAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00041-JPJ-6; 1:19-cv-81347-JPJ)

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Jones, DENNIS E. JONES & ASSOCIATES, PC, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Samuel Cagle Juhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tracy Allen Callihan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Callihan has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No.-.

#### Bullen *v.*Derego et al.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file the petition for writ of certiorari without an affidavit of indigency granted.