alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.81

LOGO

November 17, 2008

Jean-Frederic Viret

Dear Jean:

Anesiva, Inc. (the Company) is pleased to offer you an amendment (the Amendment) to your employment terms, as set forth in the offer letter between you and the Company, dated November 21, 2002 (the Offer
Letter). The employment terms set forth in this Amendment are effective as of November 17, 2008 (the Amendment Date). Unless this Amendment specifically states that it supersedes a term in the Offer Letter, the terms of the
Offer Letter shall remain binding and in full force and effect.

1. Retention Bonus.You will be eligible to receive a Retention
Bonus in an amount equal to two (2) months of your base salary currently in effect, to be earned and payable on the following schedule: (i) 50% of the bonus on November 17, 2008, (ii) 25% of the bonus on November 26, 2008,
and (iii) 25% of the bonus on December 15, 2008.

In the event that you resign from employment with the Company for any reason
before February 9, 2009, you agree that you will repay to the Company this Retention Bonus amount paid to you (Retention Repayment Amount) pursuant to this Section. Any Retention Repayment Amount that must be repaid pursuant to this
paragraph will be paid within thirty (30) days following your last date of employment with the Company.

In the event that you are
involuntarily terminated from employment with the Company, you will not be liable for repayment of the Retention Bonus.

2. Employment
Relationship. Your employment with the Company is and continues to be at will as described in your Offer Letter.

3. Supersedes. This Amendment supersedes and replaces any prior agreements, representations or understandings, whether written, oral or implied, between you and the Company regarding this subject matter described herein, provided
that unless specifically superseded by this Amendment, the terms of the Offer Letter remain in full force and effect.

We hope that you
find the forgoing terms acceptable. You may indicate your agreement with these terms and accept this Amendment by signing and dating the Amendment and returning it to me.



Very truly yours,ANESIVA, INC.By:

/s/ Michael L. KrandaMichael L. KrandaPresident & Chief Executive Officer


I have read, and accept and agree to, the terms of this Amendment to my Offer Letter:



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jean-Frederic Viret
|Jean-Frederic Viret    

Dated: 11-18-08
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD.

# ACTION:

Termination of Federal Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing this notice to announce that it is terminating the Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel, effective July 27, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jim Freeman, Advisory Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-692-5952.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This committee is being terminated under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 41 CFR 102-3.55, and the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b), effective September 30, 2014.

Dated: January 26, 2015.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2015-01659 Filed 1-28-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```

[Federal Register: March 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 52)]
[Notices]               
[Page 13134-13135]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr10-80]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and

[[Page 13135]]

Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Medical Liability and Safety 
Innovation Projects (R21) applications are to be reviewed and discussed 
at this meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-
cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: Medical Liability and Safety Innovation Projects 
(R2l)
    Date: April 2, 2010 (Open on April 2 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Doubletree Bethesda Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Conference Room TBD, Bethesda, Maryland 
20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.
    This notice is published less than 15 days in advance of the 
meeting date due to logistical difficulties.

    Dated: March 8, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-5744 Filed 3-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Survey and Evaluation of System Interaction Events and Sources (NUREG/CR-3922, ORNL/NOAC-224)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Jack W. Callicutt, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Galectin Therapeutics, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016

/s/ Jack W. Callicutt

Jack W. Callicutt

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 86-834.

#### New Jersey District Court Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*Supreme Court of New Jersey et al.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Index of Risk Exposure and Risk Acceptance Criteria (NUREG/CR-1930, BNL-NUREG-51339)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-1930 (PDF - 4.38 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1981**Date Published:**February 1981

**Prepared by:** B. Miller and R.E. Hall Risk Assessment and Engineering Analysis Group Department of Nuclear Energy  Brookhaven National Laboratory  Upton, NY 11973 

**Prepared for:** Methodology and Data Branch  Division of Systems and Reliability Research  Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC FIN A-3222

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains abstracts of articles which address various aspects of quantitative risk analysis, covering the subjects of numerical risk criteria, methodology and data. The articles were published primarily from 1976 to date in technical journals, reports, papers, etc. The articles selected for this report were judged to have relevance to nuclear power plant risk evaluations and to the possible establishment of the acceptability (or unacceptability) of calculated nuclear power plant risks. A matrix of the various risk criteria proposed is presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF OMNIPOINT CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         235,700
<SECURITIES>                                    45,848
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,816
<INVENTORY>                                     26,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,810
<PP&E>                                         954,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (86,574)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,984,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,740
<BONDS>                                        478,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    265,732
<COMMON>                                           527
<OTHER-SE>                                    (497,962)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,984,355
<SALES>                                         73,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,257
<CGS>                                          113,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              92,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (294,019)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (11,115)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (305,134)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (5.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.88)


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Assigns New Senior Resident Inspector to Seabrook

----

----

I-97-163

December 30, 1997

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO SEABROOK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Region 1 Office has announced the assignment of a new senior resident inspector for the Seabrook nuclear power plant, in Seabrook, N.H. Raymond K. Lorson was a resident inspector at the Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey before coming to Seabrook.

Mr. Lorson also has experience as a resident inspector at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania, and prior to that worked as a reactor engineer for the Division of Reactor Projects at the Region 1 Office in King of Prussia, Pa.

From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Lorson served as a nuclear submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. He is a graduate of the University of Pittsburgh, with a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,821
<SECURITIES>                                    13,352
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,055
<INVENTORY>                                      1,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,833
<PP&E>                                          10,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,107
<SALES>                                         21,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,906
<CGS>                                           10,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                       852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,556
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), Vincent A Wasik and Edward W. Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Velocity Express Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Velocity Express Corporation.



/s/ Vincent A. WasikVincent A. WasikChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2007/s/ Edward W. StoneEdward. W. StoneChief Financial OfficerDate: May 15, 2007
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Generalized Procedure for Generating Flaw-Related Inputs for the FAVOR Code (NUREG/CR-6817, Rev. 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6817, Rev. 1 (PDF - 9.52 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2013**Date Published:** August 2013

**Prepared by:** F. A. Simonen, S. R. Doctor, G. J. Schuster, and P. G. Heasler

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

D. Jackson and W. E. Norris, NRC Project Managers

NRC Job Code Y6604 and N6398

**Prepared for**: Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) supported research to re-evaluate the technical basis for Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50.61, "Fracture toughness requirements for protection against pressurized thermal shock events." During plant operation, the walls of reactor pressure vessels (RPV) are exposed to neutron radiation, resulting in a localized embrittlement of the vessel steel and weld materials in the core area. If an embrittled RPV had an existing flaw of critical size and certain severe system transients were to occur, this flaw could very rapidly propagate through the vessel, resulting in a through-wall crack that could challenge the integrity of the RPV. The severe transients of concern, known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS), are characterized by a rapid cooling (i.e., thermal shock) of the internal reactor pressure vessel surface in combination with re-pressurization of the RPV.

Specifically, the crack-like flaws of concern are those near the inner vessel surface. This report documents research performed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to assess fabrication flaws in RPVs. The research generated data on flaws in RPVs in terms of flaw densities, flaw locations, and flaw sizes (through-wall depth dimensions and lengths). This report describes data from the research, results from an expert judgment elicitation on RPV fabrication practices, and probabilistic models that characterize flaws that may exist in RPVs. A procedure is described for generating flaw-related parameters for use as inputs to probabilistic fracture mechanics calculations. The report addresses the treatment of welding flaws using the flaws per unit area concept and describes additional details of the flaw model used in the FAVOR(a) probabilistic fracture mechanics code.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### In the Matter of Hershel Lee LOVETT and Margie Ann Lovett, Debtors. Hershel Lee LOVETT and Margie Ann Lovett, Appellants, v. BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO., Appellee.

Bankruptcy No. 80-01729-SJ.

No. 81-6007-CV-SJ.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, St. Joseph Division.

Oct. 8, 1982.

Hugh A. Miner, St. Joseph, Mo., for appellants.

Steven C. Effertz, Stoup & Bohm, Kansas City, for appellee.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, VACATING DECISION AND ALLOWING LIEN AVOIDANCE

SACHS, District Judge.

The Court has heretofore affirmed the final judgment of Bankruptcy Judge Stewart denying the complaint of plaintiffs (debtors) for lien avoidance. *Matter of Lovett,*11 B.R. 123 (D.C.W.D.Mo.1981). The theory of the Court was that the security interest vested prior to the date of enactment of the Bankruptcy Code could not constitutionally be made subject to the new lien avoidance provisions. *Rodrock v. Security Industrial Bank,*642 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir. 1981), prob. juris, noted, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 969, 71 L.Ed.2d 108 (1981).

Debtors moved for reconsideration, contending that there was a refinancing on March 25, 1980, subsequent to the passage and effective date of the Code, which allows the lien avoidance provisions of the Code to be given effect. The facts are not in controversy. While there is significant carefully ruled authority to the contrary *(Matter of Chambell,*17 B.R. 597 (Bkrtcy, W.D.Mo. 1982); *In re Gibson,*16 B.R. 257 (Bkrtcy., D.Kan. 1981)), the considerable weight of recent authority clearly favors holding that a creditor who renews or refinances a loan subsequent to the date of the Code subjects itself to the lien avoidance provisions of the Code. *Matter of Ward,*14 B.R. 549 (D.C.S.D.Ga.1981) (and cases cited therein); *Matter of Hitts,*21 B.R. 158, 160 (Bkrtcy, W.D.Mich.1982); *In re Slater,*19 B.R. 954, 955, 9 B.C.D. 205 (Bkrtcy, D.Md.1982); *In re Schneider,*18 B.R. 274, 276, 8 B.C.D. 1084 (Bkrtcy, D.N.D. 1982); *In re Averhoff,*18 B.R. 198, 202 (Bkrtcy, N.D.Iowa 1982); *In re Hobdy,*18 B.R. 70, 74 (Bkrtcy, W.D.Ky.1982). Whatever may be the status and effect of security interests in other contexts upon renewal or refinancing of a loan, it appears that the Bankruptcy Code is being construed generally in favor of lien avoidance under circumstances such as those here presented.

*761It is therefore ORDERED that the Court’s order of March 17, 1981, denying plaintiffs’ complaint for lien avoidance is reconsidered, and vacated, and lien avoidance is hereby granted in accordance with plaintiffs’ complaint.