alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

 EXHIBIT 11.1

MECON, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                 September 30,            September 30,
                                            ----------------------------------------------
                                                 1998        1997         1998      1997
                                            ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>         <C>       <C>
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Weighted average common stock outstanding       6,233       6,061        6,223     6,034
                                            ----------------------------------------------

Net income (loss)                                $809        $375       $1,260     ($306)
                                            ----------------------------------------------

Basic earnings (loss) per share                 $0.13       $0.06        $0.20    ($0.05)
                                            ----------------------------------------------
                                            ----------------------------------------------


DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Weighted average common stock outstanding       6,233       6,061        6,223     6,034

Dilutive effect of options outstanding            344         201          409       -
                                            ----------------------------------------------

Weighted average common and dilutive
 potential common stock outstanding             6,577       6,262        6,632     6,034
                                            ----------------------------------------------

Net income (loss)                                $809        $375       $1,260     ($306)
                                            ----------------------------------------------

Diluted earnings (loss) per share               $0.12       $0.06        $0.19    ($0.05)
                                            ----------------------------------------------
                                            ----------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
 


                                                   20
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                          |  |                                   
|---------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. 
|                 |  |  |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
|                 |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  | By:                      |  | KESTREL HEAT LLC (General Partner)
|                 |  |  | 
|February 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                      |  | /s/ RICHARD F. AMBURY             
|                 |  |  |  |                          |  | Richard F. Ambury                 
|                 |  |  |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer           
|                 |  |  |  |                          |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.           
|                 |  |  |  |                          |  | Star Gas Finance Company
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against a Turbine Trip From 100% Power in the Vandellos II Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG/IA-0108,ICSP–V2–R100–R)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0108 (PDF 1.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** June 1993

**Prepared by:** C. Llopis/A. N. V. J. Perez, R. Mendizabal/C. S. N.

Asociacion Nuclear Vandellos (A. N. V.) Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (C. S. N.) Madrid, Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 cycle 36.04 against a turbine trip from 100% power in Vandellós II NPP (Spain) is presented. The work is inscribed in the framework of the spanish contribution to ICAP Project.

The model used in the simulation consists of a single loop, a steam generator and a steam line up to the steam header all of them enlarged on a scale of 3:1; and full-scaled reactor vessel and pressurizer.

The results of the calculations have been in reasonable agreement with plant measurements. An additional study has been performed, to check the ability of a model in which all the plant components are full-scaled to reproduce the transient. A second study has been performed using the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model in the pressurizer, trying to elucidate the influence of the velocity slip in the primary depressurization rate.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### In re E.K.P., INC., a Corporation, d/b/a Best Western Colony House, Debtor. ANNISTON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. E.K.P., INC., a Corporation, d/b/a Best Western Colony House, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 83-03261.

AP No. 83-1077.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama.

March 2, 1984.

Harry P. Long, Anniston, Ala., for plaintiff, Anniston Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n.

Thomas J. Knight, Anniston, Ala., Robert H. Adams, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-debtor, E.K.P., Inc.

*20ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

L. CHANDLER WATSON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The above-styled adversary proceeding is before the Court on the plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment on whether the automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) applies to the cosigners and guarantors of debts of the chapter 11 debtor. At a pre-trial conference in this proceeding on October 18, 1983, at Anniston, Alabama, the attorney for the plaintiff and the attorney for the defendant agreed to submit the matter to the Court on a motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff has now filed its’ motion for summary judgment and a brief in support of its motion. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint and filed a brief in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.

After having considered the respective motions, it is the opinion of the bankruptcy judge that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law as to Counts One and Two of its complaint. 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(a), 1301(a); *See, e.g., Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc.,*705 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1983); *Royal Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. Armadora, Etc.,*10 B.R. 488 (N.D.Ill.1981) The Court having determined that there is no stay imposed by § 362(a) against the cosigners and guarantors of the chapter 11 debtor, the plaintiff’s motion for relief from the stay to pursue its claims against the cosigners and guarantors of the debtor’s debt may be dismissed.

Therefore, it is ORDERED by the Court that the debtor’s motion to dismiss the complaint is denied, that the plaintiff, under Counts One and Two of its complaint is adjudged to have the right to pursue its claims against the cosigners .and guarantors of the debtor, that the motion for relief from the stay is dismissed out of court, and that a copy of this order shall be sent through the United States mails to each of the following (which shall be sufficient service and notice hereof): the debtor, its attorneys, the plaintiff’s attorney, and the United States trustee.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# NRC Authorizes USEC To Increase Uranium Enrichment at  Paducah, Kentucky, Plant

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5, TRACE and APROS Model Benchmark for the IAEA SPE-4 Experiment (NUREG/IA-0533)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0533 (PDF - 16.85 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2021**Date Published:**September 2022

**Prepared by:**R.Orosz, T. Varju, Á. Aranyosy, V. Holl, T. Hajas & A. Aszódi

Budapest University of Technology and EconomicsInstitute of Nuclear TechniquesMűegyetem rkp. 3.1111 Budapest, HungaryK.Tien, NRC Project ManagerDivision of Systems AnalysisOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Prepared as part ofThe Agreement on Research Participation and Technical ExchangeUnder the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 30, 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1604 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1604

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend to physician 
assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive payments for the adoption 
  and use of certified electronic health records, whether or not such 
  physician assistants practice at a rural health center or Federally 
                        qualified health center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2017

   Ms. Bass introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to extend to physician 
assistants eligibility for Medicaid incentive payments for the adoption 
  and use of certified electronic health records, whether or not such 
  physician assistants practice at a rural health center or Federally 
                        qualified health center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health IT Modernization for 
Underserved Communities Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID 
              ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(t)(3)(B)(v) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(t)(3)(B)(v)) is amended by striking ``insofar as 
the assistant is practicing in a rural health clinic that is led by a 
physician assistant or is practicing in a Federally qualified health 
center that is so led''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to payments made for calendar quarters beginning on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Championship Wrestling, Inc. ("Galaxy") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerome Jolly, President, Principal Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer of Galaxy certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Galaxy.

Date: April 6, 2004

/s/ Jerome Jolly

Jerome Jolly

President, Principal Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer











#
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# News Releases - 2020

Subscribe to receive our news releases by email.

JanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search News Releases

#### Related Information

            - Speeches
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), Vincent A Wasik and Edward W. Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Velocity Express Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter and nine months ended March 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of Velocity Express Corporation as of the dates presented and the results of operations of Velocity Express Corporation for the periods presented.



/s/ Vincent A. WasikVincent A. WasikChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
OfficerDate: May 19, 2008/s/ Edward W. StoneEdward W. StoneChief Financial OfficerDate: May 19, 2008


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Velocity Express Corporation and will be retained by Velocity Express
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Janet L. N. Ackerman, Appellant, v Don E. Ackerman, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 657]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered May 17, 1995, which denied plaintiff wife’s motion to enjoin defendant husband from prosecuting a divorce action he instituted in Connecticut, and granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the instant action to the extent of staying its prosecution pending the Connecticut action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

"The rule of comity forbids our courts from enjoining an action in a sister State 'unless it is clearly shown that the suit sought to be enjoined was brought in bad faith, motivated by fraud or an intent to harass the party seeking an injunction, or if its purpose was to evade the law of the domicile of the parties’ ” *(Chayes v Chayes,*180 AD2d 566, quoting *Hyman Constr. Co. v Precision Walls,*132 AD2d 523, 526; *see also, Vanneck v Vanneck,*49 NY2d 602, 608). No such showing was made here. There is no indication that plaintiff’s rights cannot be fully protected in Connecticut, that its courts will be unable to adjudicate fairly all issues relating to dissolution of the marriage and distribution of the parties’ property, or that defendant’s contacts with Connecticut during the marriage were so insubstantial as to render his post-separation residence there less than bona fide. We would also note that the Connecticut action was commenced first, and that a clear basis *516for jurisdiction in Connecticut exists under Connecticut General Statutes Annotated § 46b-44 (a), which provides that "[a] complaint for dissolution of a marriage or for legal separation may be filed at any time after either party has established residence in this state” *(cf., Vanneck v Vanneck, supra,*at 608-609). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
No: 19-018 April 4, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Seeks Public Comment on Draft Environmental Impact Statement

for Turkey Point Subsequent License Renewal

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Homestead, Fla., on May 1 to discuss the 

agency’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Florida Power & Light’s Subsequent License 

Renewal application for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Units 3 and 4. In its application, FP&L is 

seeking an additional 20 years of operation.

The NRC is interested in the public’s views on the draft conclusion that environmental 

issues would be minor ones, allowing the agency to issue the renewed license.

The meetings will be held at the Homestead City Hall, 100 Civic Court, in Homestead, from 

1-3 p.m., and 6-8 p.m. Staff presentations will describe the environmental review process and the 

draft findings. Each meeting’s presentations will be followed by a formal public comment period. 

The NRC has scheduled open-house events from noon-1 p.m., and 5-6 p.m., enabling members of 

the public to speak informally with agency staff.

To register in advance to comment at the meetings, or to identify an individual’s special 

needs for attending or presenting information at the meetings, contact William Burton at 

800-368-5642 x6332 or at william.burton@nrc.gov by April 23. Requests to speak on the day of the 

meetings require registration no later than 12:45 p.m., and 5:45 p.m., respectively. Individual 

comments could be limited as determined by the time available and the number of speakers.

NRC staff will also consider written comments on the draft EIS until May 20, following the 

publication of a notice in the Federal Register. Include Docket ID NRC-2018-0101 with the

comment via the regulations.gov website.

FP&L submitted the Turkey Point subsequent license renewal application on Jan. 30, 2018. 

The subsequent license renewal process determines whether an operating reactor can extend its 

license for an additional 20 years (initial license renewals add 20 years to a reactor’s original 

40-year license). The application, less proprietary details, is available on the NRC website. In 

addition, the following libraries will maintain a copy of the application’s draft EIS for public 

inspection: Homestead Branch Library at 700 N. Homestead Blvd., in Homestead; Naranja Branch 

Library at 14850 SW 280th St., in Homestead; South Dade Regional Library at 10750 SW 211th St.,

in Miami; and Miami-Dade Main Library at 101 W. Flagler St., in Miami.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# ICAP [International Code Assessment and Applications Program] Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2, Cycle 36.05 Against LOFT [Loss of Fluid Test] Small Break Experiment L3-7 (NUREG/IA-0031)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0031 (PDF 5.36 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 1990

**Prepared by:** Euy-Joon Lee, Bud-Dong Chung, Hho-Jung Kim

Nuclear Safety Center Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The LOFT small break (1 in-dia) experiment L3-7 has been analyzed using the reactor thermal hydraulic analysis code RELAP5/MODZ, Cycle 36.05.

The base calculation (Case A) was completed and compared with the experimental data. Three types of sensitivity studies (Cases B, C, and D) were carried out to investigate the effects of (1) break discharge coefficient Cd, (2) pump two-phase difference multiplier and (3) High Pressure Injection System (HPIS) capacity on major thermal and hydraulic (T/H) parameters. A nodalization study (Case E) was conducted to assess the phenomena with a simplified nodalization.

The results indicate that Cd of 0.9 and 0.1 fit to the single discharge flow rate of Test L3-7 best among the tried cases. The pump two-phase multiplier has little effects on the T/H parameters because of the low discharge flow rate and the early pump coast down in this smaller size SBLOCA. But HPIS capacity has a very strong influence on parameters such as pressure, flow and temperature. It is also shown that a simplified nodalization could accomodate the dominant T/H phenomena with the same degree of code accuracy and efficiency.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021