alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Martelli et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 369]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated December 17, 1992, as denied that branch of their post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, a new trial on their cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial, was properly denied. There is plainly a rational view of the trial evidence that supports the jury’s verdict *(see, Campbell v City of Elmira,*84 NY2d 505; *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493). Moreover, the jury’s verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129).

High-speed auto chases by the police are specifically authorized by the Vehicle and Traffic Law *(see,*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 [b] [3]), notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180. Under the circumstances, the jury could have found that the officers’ brief pursuit of the fleeing vehicle, after being alerted by a police radio report that *587the occupants were robbery suspects who had already eluded another police unit, was in conformity with the procedures for high-speed auto pursuits as set forth in the New York City Police Department Patrol Guide (hereinafter Patrol Guide).

We note that the City’s contention that a violation of a Patrol Guide procedure cannot serve as a predicate for a claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e is without merit *(see, Galapo v City of New York,*219 AD2d 581 [decided herewith]; *Desmond v City of New York,*219 AD2d 576 [decided herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# TRACE Simulation of SBO Accident and Mitigation Strategy in Maanshan PWR (NUREG/IA-0430)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0430 (PDF - 2.11 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2013**Date Published:** September 2013

**Prepared by:** Jong-Rong Wang, Kai-Chun Huang*, Hao-Tzu Lin, Chunkuan Shih*

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Atomic Energy Council, R.O.C. 1000, Wenhua Rd., Chiaan Village, Lungtan, Taoyuan, 325, TAIWAN

*Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, 101 Section 2, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Maanshan Nuclear Power Station is a two-unit Westinghouse three-loop PWR power station. This research studies the simulation of Maanshan SBO accident happened on 18th March, 2001, and thermal-hydraulic phenomena of the plant during station blackout with and without mitigation strategies. The modeling and simulation works were done by using TRACE code, which is a best-estimate thermal-hydraulic system code developed by US NRC. The purpose of using the mitigation strategy during SBO is to cool down NSSS as soon as possible, to keep the fuel covered by water, and not to let peak cladding temperature (PCT) higher than 1088K (1500°F), which is the temperature that metal-water reaction can self-sustain. Actions that considered such as operation of auxiliary feedwater system, depressurization of steam generators (SG), and line-up the alternate water sources such as sea water when regular systems aren't available.

The simulations of mitigation strategies start from normal operation at 100% power then an earthquake is assumed to happen, tsunami strike the site 20 minutes later, and failure of turbine driven auxiliary feedwater is assumed in base cases. Two different basic mitigation strategies were simulated, include (1) SG controlled-depressurization at the time that SBO happen and SG alternate injection after 1 hour of SBO, (2) SG depressurization at the time after 1 hour of SBO that injection is ready. In addition, alternate injection preparation time is further extended to find the longest acceptable value. Reactor coolant pump shaft seal leakage is also considered in all cases.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Completes Evaluation of Department of Energy Report on Tritium Production

----

----

No. 99-109 May 26, 1999

**NRC COMPLETES EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REPORT ON TRITIUM PRODUCTION**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concluded that a special Department of Energy (DOE) technical report has satisfactorily addressed many of the technical issues involved in the use of a commercial nuclear power plant for production of tritium, a material essential to the U.S. nuclear weapon arsenal.

The DOE report was submitted to NRC last July. Known as "Tritium Production Core Topical Report," it evaluates the effect of tritium production on the many technical areas NRC reviews during the nuclear power plant licensing process. It is expected to be referenced by licensees seeking authority to produce tritium in a power reactor. The unclassified version of the report has been placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

NRC also has found that, because of the variety of plant designs in the U.S. -- and since the DOE report did not include plant-specific analyses -- 17 areas will need to be analyzed further in a plant-specific license amendment request by any licensee seeking to produce tritium in a commercial plant. These issues include such matters as reactor vessel integrity, control room habitability, spent fuel storage, and the spent fuel pool cooling system. NRC findings are contained in a safety evaluation of the DOE report. The NRC evaluation also spells out changes that will need to be made in license technical specifications.

DOE announced in December that it had chosen the Tennessee Valley Authority's Watts Bar and Sequoyah plants in Tennessee for its commercial light water reactor tritium production program. As a result, NRC anticipates license amendment requests for that purpose from TVA next year.

Because of the importance of this program to U.S. national security, the Commission will assign high priority to the requests. It also will follow the normal process for considering such amendments, which includes the opportunity for a hearing. NRC further plans to hold public meetings in the vicinity of each plant before tritium production can begin.

The NRC safety evaluation, NUREG-1672, will be available for purchase from the Government Printing Office and also will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room, for copying and inspection. The full text of the report will be posted on the NRC Internet web site.

Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that is essential for the effective functioning of nuclear weapons in the U.S. arsenal. The United States has not produced tritium since 1988.

Because tritium decays at the rate of about five percent per year, DOE concluded that the U.S. will need new production by 2005. Current, short-term tritium needs are being met by recycling tritium from dismantled nuclear weapons.

TVA has conducted a small scale test of tritium production at the Watts Bar Unit 1. NRC approved a license amendment in September 1997 for that purpose.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No. 91-6130.

#### Lord *v.*Attorney General of New York et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# HSM-51 Sailors, Coast Guard, and Guam Fire Department Rescue Capsized Crew

By Petty Officer 1st Class Benjamin Lewis 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 86-1079.

#### Koczak et al. *v.*Dixon et al.

Appeal from C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of National Legal Foundation and Center for Judicial Studies for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
#### Stoffle and wife, Appellants, vs. Hilker and another, Respondents.

*February 11*

March 9, *1926.*

Judgment reversed in accordance with the opinion in *Stoffle v. Hilker, ante,*p. 414, tried herewith.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine- county: E. B. Belden, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed, zvith directions.*

For the appellants there were briefs by *John T. Boos*of Chicago and *McGovern, Lyons, Czvrtis, Devos & Reiss*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *F. E. McGovern.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Thompson, Harvey & Monk,*attorneys, and *John B. Simmons,*of counsel, all of Racine, •and a separate brief by *John B. Simmons;*and the cause was argued orally by *Mr. Fulton Thompson*and *Mr. Simmons.*

CrowNHArt, J.

This case was tried with the case of *Katherine Stoffle v. Fred C. Hilker*and *James Hilker,*and was presented on the same bill of exceptions. It presents substantially the same questions. The claim here was for the damages suffered by the parents of the injured child. The jury rendered one verdict, found for plaintiffs, and assessed their damages at $2,500.

The court set aside the answers of the jury finding defendants guilty of negligence, and rendered judgment in favor of defendants dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs appeal. The case is governed by the decision in *Katherine Stoffle v. Fred C. Hilker*and *James Hilker, ante,*p. 414, 207 N. W. 685.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is.reversed, with directions to the circuit, court to restore the answers of the jury to the third and fourth questions’ in the verdict, and to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the verdict of the jury.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsManagement Directives

# Volume 9 - NRC Organization and Functions

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Volume 1
          - Volume 2
          - Volume 3
          - Volume 4
          - Volume 5
          - Volume 6
          - Volume 7
          - Volume 8
          - Volume 9
          - Volume 10
          - Volume 11
          - Volume 12
          - Volume 13
          - Volume 14

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 26, 2024
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

ZORAN CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zoran Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Levy Gerzberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 9, 2004 |   |                                  |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                             |   |                                  |
|                             |   | /s/ Levy Gerzberg                     |   |
|                             |   | Levy Gerzberg                         |
|                             |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2006.



| | CALVIN KANTONEN        
| | -----------------------
| | Calvin L. Kantonen     
| | Chief Financial Officer

















---
EXHIBIT 10.2



14 August 2003

The Directors
BresaGen Limited
38 Wmwood Street
Thebarton SA 5031

Dear Sirs:



CONSENT TO BE NAMED IN SEC FORM 20-F


Acuity Technoloy Management Pty Ltd consents to the incorporation by reference
in the consolidated financial statements of BresaGen Limited and its controlled
entities included in the Annual Financial Report (Form 20-F) for the year ending
June 30, 2002 of our following reports:

o    Report dated October 2000 with respect to the valuation of
     intellectual property acquired by BresaGen from CytoGenesis. Inc;
     and

o    Report dated June 29, 2001 with respect to the carrying value of all
     BresaGen's intellectual property at that time.




Yours sincerely


/s/D.H. RANDERSON
D.H. RANDERSON
Managing Director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fredric N. Eshelman, Chief Executive Officer of PPD, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: May 5, 2004
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and DISease Registry Atlanta GA 30333 September29, 2010 The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 

### 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Ms. Jackson: This letter is regarding 

### a Public Health Advisory for hexavalent chromium exposures associated with the 

### E.e. Electroplating site 

### in Garfield, New Jersey. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)

### has evaluated the available ;monmation for the E.C. Electroplating site. We consider the site a serious threat to human health under exposure scenarios related to the infiltrationofgroundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium. In accordance with Section 104(iX6)(H) ofthe Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), we are notifying you ofourpositiononthe E.e. Electroplating site and requesting that you place the site on the National Priorities List. Enclosed is the Public Health Advisory that expresses ourconcerns and addresses measures to eliminate or mitigate the risk to human health. The Directorofthe National Center for Environmental HealthlATSDR has notified the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Administrator and the New Jersey Department ofHealth and Senior Services about this Advisory. Sincerely,

# ~~ Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention, and Administrator, ATSDR Enclosure

cc: NewJersey Department ofHealth and Senior Services EPA Administrator, Region II
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# ACRS Action: FY 2005–FY 2008 Plan (NUREG/BR-0286, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0286, Revision 1 (PDF - 942 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**November 2004

**Prepared by:** Maggalean W. Weston

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001 

## Introduction

This plan provides guidance and direction for the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) for the years 2005–2008 to focus the Committee on the issues that are most important to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in carrying out its mission to protect public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment. It also defines the mission, goals, objectives, and priorities of the ACRS, consistent with the NRC's Strategic Plan. In addition, this plan provides ACRS as well as the criteria that the ACRS uses to select issues for review.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Motion s Denied; Petition s for Writ of Mandamus , Injunction and Prohibition

Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 19 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 12
- 00868
- CV NO. 14
- 12
- 00869
- CV NO. 14
- 12
- 00870
- CV

IN RE ROBERT H. BURR OUGHS , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS WRIT OF INJUNCTION WRIT OF PROHIBITION On Appeal from the Probate Court No 4

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 396,576
- 401
MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 21, 2012, relator, Robert H. Burroughs, filed a petition for writ of

m andamus , writ of injunction, writ of prohibition and motion for emergency relief in this C ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App

. P. 52. On October 5, 2012, relator filed an amended motion for temporary relief. R elator ask s this Court to enjoin t he Honorable Judge Christine Butts , presiding judge of the Probate2

Court No

. 4 of Harris C ounty , from enforcing her o rder of August 2 2 , 2012 and interfering with appeal number 14

- 12

- 00627

- CV in this court

. In a probate proceeding, an order is final and appealable if it disposes of all parties or issues in a particular phase. See DeAyala v. Mackie , 193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006); In re Estate of Byrom , 2011 WL 590588 Tex. App.

-- Tyler 2011, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (found order of removal final and appealable). The trial court’s order does not address the request for attorney fees and does not include language i ndicating that it was den ying relief not expressly granted

. In the absence of language of finality, a trial court's failure to dispose of a pending attorney's fees claim renders a judgment interlocutory. See McNally v. Guevara, 52 S.W.3d 195, 196 (Tex. 2001)

. Upon entry of a fi nal order, relator has an adequate remedy by appeal.
R elator has not established that he is entitled to relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus , writ of injunction, writ of prohibition , motion for emergency relief and amended motion for temporary relief

.

PER CURIAM

Pa nel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, Jamison.

.
Exhibit 32
      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Michael E. DeHaan,  Chairman,  President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Karen
M. Wirth,  Treasurer,  of Chesterfield  Financial Corp. (the "Corporation") each
certify in his or her capacity as an officer of the  Corporation  that he or she
has reviewed the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form
10-K  for the  year  ended  June  30,  2004  and  that to the best of his or her
knowledge:

     1.  the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Corporation.



October 28, 2004                /s/ Michael E. DeHaan
                                ------------------------------------
                                Michael E. DeHaan
                                Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer


October 28, 2004                /s/ Karen M. Wirth
                                -----------------------------------
                                Karen M. Wirth
                                Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  Chesterfield  Financial  Corp. and will be retained by Chesterfield
Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.