alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# Prehearing Conference Scheduled on Shearon Harris Plant License Amendment

----

----

No. 99-92 May 3, 1999

**PREHEARING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ON SHEARON HARRIS PLANT LICENSE AMENDMENT**

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a prehearing conference May 13 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for parties in a proceeding involving a proposed license amendment for the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant.

Carolina Power & Light (CP&L) is seeking the license change to permit the use of two remaining spent fuel pools in the plant's fuel handling building, doubling storage capacity. The Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, has petitioned for a hearing on the CP&L request.

At the conference, the Licensing Board will hear arguments on the Board of Commissioners' standing as an intervenor and the admissibility of its contentions. The Licensing Board will issue an order later ruling on these questions. Other parties taking part will be CP&L and the NRC staff.

The prehearing conference was originally scheduled to be held in Rockville, Maryland, but was moved upon the request of the Commissioners of Orange County.

The conference will begin at 9:30 a.m., at the District Court of Orange County Courtroom located in the Chapel Hill Post Office Building, at 179 E. Franklin Street. If necessary, the conference will continue the following day.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1713 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1713

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the essential air 
                service program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2017

 Mr. Russell (for himself, Mr. Palmer, and Mr. McClintock) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the essential air 
                service program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Free Market Flights Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 41749. Termination of essential air service program
    ``(a) In General.--The authority of the Secretary of Transportation 
to carry out the essential air service program under this subchapter 
shall terminate on October 1, 2017.
    ``(b) Use of Fees for Deficit Reduction.--
            ``(1) In general.--For fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 2017, amounts credited to the account established 
        under section 45303 from overflight fees authorized under 
        section 45301(a)(1) that would otherwise be made available 
        under section 41742 for obligation and expenditure to carry out 
        the essential air service program under this subchapter shall 
        be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury and shall be 
        used for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
            ``(2) Statutory construction.--Paragraph (1) shall apply 
        notwithstanding any provision of section 45303(c) that directs 
        the amounts described in paragraph (1) to be made available for 
        expenditure for activities of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 417 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 41748 the following:

``41749. Termination of essential air service program.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Post-Test Analysis of PKL III Test H2.2 Run 2 (SBO) with TRACE (NUREG/IA-0545)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0545 (PDF - 2.80 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2022**Date Published:** March 2024

**Prepared by:**D.Blanco, C. Berna, L. Álvarez, J. L. Muñoz-Cobo, A. EscriváEscrivá Instituto de Ingeniería Energética Universitat Politècnica de València Camino de Vera 14, 46022 València SpainK.Tien, NRC Project Manager**Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ****Prepared as part of **The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP) 

**Published by:**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents and explains the main results obtained in the simulations performed with the TRACE consolidated thermal-hydraulic code in relation to the PKL III H2.2 Run 2 test. The H2.2 Run 2 test deals with a Station Blackout (SBO) in which three main phases take place. The first one in which the secondary circuit is depressurized, the second one in which the primary side is depressurized and the third one in which the emergency feedwater system (EFWS) is activated. The main goal is to analyze the capability of the TRACE V5.0 p4 code to accurately simulate the events and phenomena encountered throughout the studied transient. The activation of the different systems and the values of the main parameters will be used to assess the capabilities of the PKL model developed with the TRACE code.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 19, 2024
# L_2015175DE.01012601.xml

| 4.7.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 175/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 175/126

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1123/2014 der Kommission vom 22. Oktober 2014 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2008/38/EG mit dem Verzeichnis der Verwendungen von Futtermitteln für besondere Ernährungszwecke

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 23. Oktober 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 23. Oktober 2014

Seite 86, Anhang, Buchstabe f:

anstatt:

„Der Eintrag mit dem besonderen Ernährungszweck ‚Gewichtszunahme, Rekonvaleszenz‘, Tierart oder Tierkategorie: ‚Hunde‘, wird durch folgenden Wortlaut ersetzt:“

muss es heißen:

„Der Eintrag mit dem besonderen Ernährungszweck ‚Ernährungsphysiologische Wiederherstellung, Rekonvaleszenz‘, Tierart oder Tierkategorie: ‚Hunde‘, wird durch folgenden Wortlaut ersetzt:“.

---
#### John Russell WEBSTER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. The CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

No. 81-2007.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1984.

David L. Crawford, James K. Gardner, Timothy James, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Harvil & Hardy, Scott A. Sanes, G.P. Hardy, III, Houston, Tex., K. Michael Mayes, Conroe, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.

ON PETITION FOR EN BANC REHEARING

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGIN-BOTHAM, Circuit Judges.*

*

 Judge Henry A. Politz is recused. Judges W. Eugene Davis and Robert M. Hill were not members of the court when this case was submitted to the court en banc and did not participate in this decision.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellee John Russell Webster, et al., has petitioned for rehearing and, thereupon, that we limit the remand to the issue of damages. Upon reconsideration we conclude that the Websters should not be penalized, nor their attorneys or the trial judge faulted, for the jury instructions that lacked the refinements of our formulation to govern the imposition of municipal liability stated in. the prior en banc opinion of this case (735 F.2d 838, 841) and our recent writing in *Bennett v. City of Slidell,*728 F.2d 762 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc). From the proof made, this jury could have found liability under the instructions given.

For the above reasons, we grant rehearing to the following extent: (1) we affirm the judgment as to liability against the city; (2) we reverse .the judgment as to damages for the reasons given by the panel, 689 *994F.2d 1220, 1228; and (3) costs are adjudged against the City of Houston. In all other respects the petition for rehearing is denied. No further petition will be entertained and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07334

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07334\07334_Checklist_092810_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07334\07334_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07334\07334_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07334\07334_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07334\07334_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07334\07334_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

07334\Certification Statement Plant ID 07334.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07334\Supplemental Documents\07334_A5-2 Oneta Facility Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07334\Supplemental Documents\07334_A5-3 Pages from ON - Discharge Permit Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### The State *v.*William Aldridge & Celia Pool.

Under the act of 1805, *(Rev. c.*684.) an indictment must charge that the man and woman had not intermarried.

The defendants were convicted on the last fall circuit, at Lenoir, before his Honor Judge Doiseia, under the actof 1805, *(JRev.c.*684,) to prevent vice and immorality. The indictment was in thefollowing words: *“*Thejurors *“*&c. that W. A. late &c. unlawfully did take into his *“*house one C. P. and they did then and there have one *“*one or more children withoutparting&c. contrary &c.” After the verdict, the counsel for the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, which motion being granted, Mr, Solicitor Miller, for the state, appealed.

The *attorney*General, for the state.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

Ruuffin, Judge.'

Every indictment must allege every fact which enters into the constitution of a crime, and must also describe it either by "way of specific allegation or conclusion, as some crime known to the law. The general and large term “ unlawfully” is too indefinite to satisfy the court, unless it be used descriptively in a statute. *(Hawk.*6. 2, c. 25, s. 96). That epithet in the indictment is therefore insufficient. The charge is then one of a man and woman bedding and cohabiting together in his house, without an allegation that they had not intermarried, and without applying to such cohabitation the epithet *adulterovsly,*or concluding that thereby they committed the crime of adultery. The indictment ought certainly to have alleged such facts as would conclusively show, that the cohabitation charged is the cohabitation forbidden by the statute, namely, an adulterous one ; which I think can only be done by the express negative affirmation, that they thus cohabited, not being husband and wife, or not being joined together in matrimony ; or perhaps, by the application of the epithet *adulterously*to it. The indictment must always contain such averments, even beyond the words of the sta*332tute, as will bring the case within its true construction. But here the statute calls the crime adultery; which may well make that epithet necessary. But whether it or not, this indictment is substantially defective for the want of the averments of fact already mentioned.

Per Curiam. — Judgment aeeirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-632-000]


CID Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of CID Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is February 9, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f9bfbcabbab6979590979caa8c8989968b8db99f9c8b9ad79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41070413020e2f2d282f24123431312e333501272433226f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01494 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 93547-93548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27793]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of Advisory Committee Public Meeting

AGENCY: Agency for International Development (USAID).

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee public meeting and request for 
public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), notice 
is hereby given of Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA) 
public meeting on Thursday, December 12, 2024.

[[Page 93548]]

ADDRESSES: To view additional information related to ACVFA please visit 
https://www.usaid.gov/organization/advisory-committee.
    The meeting will feature remarks by the USAID Administrator and the 
ACVFA Chair, and two discussion panels featuring ACVFA members on (1) 
development and national security, and (2) ongoing challenges and 
opportunities for USAID policy and programming.
    You may submit comments regarding the work of ACVFA to 
[email protected]. Include ``Public Comment, ACVFA Meeting, December 12, 
2024'' in the subject line. All public comments and questions will be 
included in the official record of the meeting and posted publicly on 
the USAID website.
    American Sign Language interpretation will be provided during the 
public meeting. If you require a reasonable accommodation, please email 
[email protected]. Include ``Request for Reasonable 
Accommodation, ACVFA Meeting, December 12, 2024'' in the subject line.
    The entirety of this meeting is open to the public. You may 
register to watch the live public meeting at this link: https://usaid.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_JQF23hAxRFmqPNJZLt1ZfQ.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Vargas, Designated Federal 
Officer for ACVFA, at [email protected] or 202-705-5769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACVFA is USAID's external advisory 
committee, bringing together representatives from private voluntary 
organizations, nongovernmental organizations, academia, civil society, 
and the private sector to foster understanding, communication, and 
cooperation in the area of foreign aid.
    Pursuant to its charter, ACVFA is holding an annual public meeting 
on December 12, 2024, from 10:30 a.m.-12 p.m. ET. This meeting is free 
and open to the public. The Committee welcomes public participation and 
comment via the web and/or email addresses provided above.

Karen Vargas,
ACVFA Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-27793 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
```
#### In re HIGHWAY EXPRESS CO., Bankrupt.

Bankruptcy No. 79 B 590 (EJR).

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. New York.

July 14, 1982.

Silver & Tischler, New York City, for Trustee in Bankruptcy.

EDWARD J. RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On or about April 4, 1979, Highway Express Co. (“Highway Express”) filed a petition for an arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act. The case was converted to a liquidation proceeding and Highway Express was adjudged a bankrupt on February 2,1981. Norman R. Silver was thereafter approved as the duly elected trustee of the estate of the bankrupt.

By application dated March 15, 1982, the trustee sought court approval to remit $1,865 to the Teamsters Local 25 Federal Credit Union on behalf of certain of the bankrupt’s former employees. In a letter dated March 17, 1982, this court requested *826the trustee to supply authority for its application.

The three cases cited1 by the trustee as authority to permit the Credit Union to reclaim funds which were deducted from employees’ salaries but were not remitted to the Credit Union do not actually support such a position.

Each of the cases holds that there is a right to reclamation of goods by a seller which prevails over a trustee’s rights as a hypothetical lien creditor. Relying on § 2-702 of the Uniform Commercial Code and § 70 of the Bankruptcy Act, the courts have held that there is a right of reclamation of a credit seller which is superior to a right of an insolvent buyer’s trustee. A state-created statutory property interest prevails over the interest of the trustee.

The decisions in the aforementioned three cases deal specifically with a sale of goods by a seller to an insolvent buyer. In the instant situation, the trustee is attempting to analogize the reclamation of funds to that of goods. However, the cases cited narrowly hold that a seller of goods has a right to reclaim those goods according to statutory provisions. There is no language concerning the reclamation of money.

No authority has been cited for the reclamation of funds by a credit union in these circumstances. The application must be and it is denied.

It is so ordered.

1

. *In re Federal’s Inc.,*553 F.2d 509 (6th Cir. 1977); *In re Telemart Enterprises, Inc.,*524 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1975), *cert. denied*424 U.S. 969, 96 S.Ct. 1466, 47 L.Ed.2d 736 (1976); *In re PFA Farmers Mkt. Ass’n,*583 F.2d 992 (8th Cir. 1978).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Internal Control (NUREG/BR-0514, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0514, Revision 1 (PDF – 1.9 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**September 2019

Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

The OCFO Internal Control Team brochure describes the NRC's internal control system and how internal control and enterprise risk management are integrated.  The brochure is an educational tool to support: awareness of Federal requirements for internal control; the employee's role in internal control; and internal control's role in meeting the agency's mission. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
No: 19-009 February 25, 2019

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8205

NRC to Host Annual Regulatory Information Conference

with Focus on Transformation and Innovation

Several thousand people are expected to attend the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s largest 

public technical meeting – the 31st Annual Regulatory Information Conference to be held March 12-14 

in North Bethesda, Md.

The conference, which will be jointly hosted by NRC offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and 

Nuclear Regulatory Research, will focus primarily on innovation and transformation. Attendees will 

notice changes to the standard conference format, including the introduction of a mobile application for 

live polling and real-time feedback. The app for RIC 2019 also will allow participants to create a 

customized agenda, as well as view and download conference materials.

NRC Chairman Kristine L. Svinicki and Executive Director for Operations Margaret M. Doane 

will open the conference with an “armchair conversation” moderated by the Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation Director Ho K. Nieh, Jr., and the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Director Ray 

Furstenau. The conversation will focus on key topics facing the agency.

This year’s keynote speaker will be inventor and visionary Nathan Myhrvold, founder and chief 

executive officer of Intellectual Ventures, who is experienced in innovative and transformative 

technologies. Myhrvold will compare his experiences to NRC’s innovation and transformation 

initiatives as the agency adapts to the evolving nuclear industry and the future regulatory environment.

Attendees will hear from NRC Commissioners Jeff Baran, Stephen G. Burns, Annie Caputo and 

David Wright, who each will provide plenary remarks. Separately, Svinicki, Baran, Wright and Caputo 

will chair individual technical sessions, a change to the previous panel format.

The conference will bring together representatives from more than 30 countries, nuclear power 

plant owners and operators, nuclear materials users, other interested stakeholders and Congressional 

staffers.

The full conference program is available on the NRC’s website, including registration hours, 

badge protocol, parking and security. Information on how to obtain the app will also be available on the

website. The event is free and open to the public.

The conference will be held at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center,

5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda.