alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Publications Resulting from International Agreements

*Publications resulting from international agreements and overseen by NRC staff. Other International Agreements may be available in ADAMS.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, April 01, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, April 01, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Express Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Vincent A. WasikVincent A. WasikChief Executive OfficerJanuary 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          88,292                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    22,500                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,893                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,685                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,023,649                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,056                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,143,278                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,059                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,425                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,625,809                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,143,278                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,390                   1,188
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,238                  72,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (296,848)                (70,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                      24
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (296,848)                (71,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (296,848)                (71,022)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mildred Bart, Respondent, v John Bart, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 542]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, John Bart appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated August 13, 1993, which upon a fact-finding order of the same court also dated August 13, 1993, made after a hearing, excluded him from the petitioner’s home until August 13,1994. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated August 13, 1993.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In this case the order of protection has expired and the determination of this appeal would have no direct effect upon the parties. Further, we find that the issuance of the order of protection in this case did not constitute a " ' "permanent and significant stigma” which might indirectly affect the appellant’s status in potential future proceedings’ ” *(Matter of Brown v Brown,*185 AD2d 812; *Matter of McClure v McClure,*176 AD2d 325, 326). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as academic.

In any event, if we were to review the merits of the appeal, we would conclude that there is no basis to disturb the Family Court’s determination. The question of whether the appellant committed acts of disorderly conduct and harassment in the second degree was a disputed factual issue for the court to resolve. As the trier of fact, the Family Court’s determination regarding the credibility of the witnesses is entitled to great weight *(see, Matter of Croce v Tsombanis,*209 AD2d 516). Therefore the order of protection excluding the appellant from *711his mother’s home was not improper. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.
No: 19-003 January 11, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to Hold Oral Arguments in Albuquerque

on Holtec Spent Fuel Storage Application

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral 

arguments in Albuquerque, N.M., in late January on petitions to hold an adjudicatory hearing 

concerning an application by Holtec International to construct and operate a consolidated interim spent 

fuel storage facility in the state.

The arguments will be heard Jan. 23 beginning at 9 a.m., and, if necessary, Jan. 24, at the State 

Bar of New Mexico, 5121 Masthead St. NE, in Albuquerque. The arguments will address the standing 

of petitioners and the admissibility of their proposed contentions. The three administrative judges on 

the Board will hear arguments from counsel for the following eight groups: Beyond Nuclear; Sierra 

Club; Alliance for Environmental Strategies; a coalition of Don’t Waste Michigan, Citizens’ 

Environmental Coalition, Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination, Nuclear Energy 

Information Service, Public Citizen, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, and Nuclear Issues Study 

Group; NAC International; Fasken Land and Minerals and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners; 

Holtec International; and the NRC staff.

The Board will also reserve time for comments from a single representative from each of five 

interested local government petitioners: the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, the city of Carlsbad, 

Lea County, Eddy County, and the city of Hobbs.

The hearings will be open to the public. Signs, banners, posters, demonstrations and displays 

will not be permitted by NRC policy.

The Board is composed of three administrative judges from the NRC’s Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel. Boards may conduct adjudicative hearings on major licensing actions by the 

NRC, and are independent of the NRC staff. A Board’s rulings may be appealed to the Commission, 

the five-member body that sets NRC policy.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Goldman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify to my knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Star Gas Partners, L.P. and will be retained by
Star Gas Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |                         |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
|                     |  |  |  | By:                     |  | KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)  
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 1, 2014 |  |  |  | By:                     |  | /s/ Steven J. Goldman                
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | Steven J. Goldman                    
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  |                         |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Arctic Anvil Executes Multi-domain Operations on a Large-scale

By Airman Aaron Guerrisky354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the yearly report of Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Daniel G. Darazsdi, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report. 

Date: August 7, 2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01357]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Support for 
Conferences and Scientific Meeting (R13).
    Date: February 26, 2015.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hui Chen, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 
National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7784, [email protected].

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01357 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Smith, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 683]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered September 8, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence that he intentionally aided his accomplices by steering an undercover *534officer to them for the purchase of drugs, directing one accomplice to provide him with drugs, acting as a lookout during the sale, and by remaining with the accomplices after the sale was completed *(see, People v Kearse,*215 AD2d 104, *lv denied*86 NY2d 797). The testimony adduced at trial established "that defendant’s interest in promoting the transaction and involvement therein went beyond being a mere extension of the buyer’ ” *(supra,*at 105, quoting *People v Tention,*162 AD2d 355, 356, *lv denied*76 NY2d 991).

By raising an agency defense during his testimony, defendant opened the door to cross-examination concerning his prior crimes in order to promote the jury’s consideration of the issue whether he was a seller or merely doing a favor for a friend *(see, People v Castaneda,*173 AD2d 349, *lv denied*78 NY2d 963).

Defendant’s contention that suppression of a statement he made to his accomplices was required due to the People’s failure to provide notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (a) is unpreserved (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Guerrero,*69 NY2d 628, *revg on dissenting opn*111 AD2d 350, 355-356), and without merit. The People were not required to provide such notice since defendant’s accomplices were not "public servants” *(see, People v Rivera,*210 AD2d 178, *lv denied*85 NY2d 865). Moreover, such statement did not have to be specified in the People’s bill of particulars (CPL 200.95 [1]; *see, People v Bignall,*195 AD2d 997, *lv denied*82 NY2d 891). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
- 931 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

303 Nebraska Report

STATE v. McGIN

Cite as 303 Neb. 931

State of Nebraska, appellee, v.

Danny J. McGinn, ap

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 23, 2019. No. S-18-744.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Holt County, Mark D

Kozisek, Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for

Holt County, Kale B. Burdick, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overru

Forrest F. Peetz, of Peetz Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Nathan A. Liss, 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller‐Lerman, Cassel, Stac

Papik, and Freudenberg,

Per Curiam

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. 

McGinn.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion 

as follows:

In the analysis section, we withdraw the last paragraph2 and 

substitute the following:

1 State v. McGinn, ante p. 224, 928 N.W.2d 391 (2019).

2 Id. at 234, 928 N.W.2d at 398.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

09/27/2019 09:09 AM CDT
- 932 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

303 Nebraska Report

STATE v. McGIN

Cite as 303 Neb. 931

In this matter, because we consider all evidence admitted by the trial court, erroneously or not, we consider the 

breath test in our double jeopardy analysis. Considering 

the breath test, the evidence was sufficient to sustain 

a guilty verdict for a violation of § 60-6,196(1)(c) as 

charged. As such, double jeopardy does not forbid a 

remand for a new trial. Therefore, in consideration of 

all of the above, we reverse the district court’s decision 

affirming the county court’s conviction and remand the 

cause to the district court with directions to remand the 

matter to the county court for a new trial.

In the sole paragraph of the conclusion section, we withdraw 

the last sentence3 and substitute the following: “Accordingly, 

we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county 

court’s conviction, but determine double jeopardy does not 

require dismissal of this action.”

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modifi

 Motion for rehearing overr

3 Id.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, February 04, 2015, 9 
a.m. to February 05, 2015, 2 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on January 09, 2015, 80 FR 1427.
    The meeting notice is amended to reflect that that the open session 
of the meeting will be available via http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=15490&bhcp=1. The meeting is partially closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 21, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01370 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P