alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Z: \**  **data \**  **SIP \**  **Connecticut \**  **8 hour Ozone Redesignation \**  **MARAMA 2025 Appendices**

Name Size Type La st Modified marama_2025_appendices.zip 4,200KB WinZip File 1/10/2013 10:57 AM Appendix A1 AEO2010 New England.xls 274KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A2 AEO2010 Mid Atlantic.xls 277KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A3 AEO2010 South Atlantic.xls 281KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A4 AEO2011 New England.xlsx 32KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A5 AEO2011 Mid Atlantic.xlsx 33KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A6 AEO2011 South Atlantic.xlsx 34KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix A7 AEO2010 vs AEO2011 Comparison.docx 1,110KB Microsoft Office Word Document 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix B Population_Factors.xls 2,449KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix C Employment_Factors.xls 3,001KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix D VMT GF Nonattainment Counties.xlsx 23KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix E EPA2020 Res Wood.xls 41KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8 /2012 10:46 AM Appendix F AEO2011 - Electricity_Generation_by_EMM.xlsx 185KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix G UAF NEEDS Control FileMASTER92211.xls 1,544KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM Appendix H MAR Growth and Control.xls 550KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# TRACE (V 5.0 Patch 2) Validation Based on the RELAP5-Calculation of FIX-III LOCA Experiments NO. 5052, 4011, 3051 (NUREG/IA-0415)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0415 (PDF - 10.15 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2013**Date Published:** October 2014

**Prepared by:** S. ChunHong Sheng

Studsvik Nuclear AB SE-61182 Nyköping Sweden

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The purpose of this project is to (i) evaluate the functionality of the SNAP capability to convert RELAP5 input files to corresponding TRACE input, and (ii) to validate the TRACE code against selected FIX-II experiments where the blowdown phase of large and small break LOCA is the main focus.

More specifically, the TRACE Version 5.0 Patch 2 code is validated against the FIX-II experiments, where the input is obtained by converting a legacy RELAP5 FIX-II model by means of SNAP, possibly accompanied by additional manual adjustments. All FIX-II components in the RELAP5 model are retained after being converted to TRACE. Three transients (FIX 5052, 4011 and 3051) are analyzed. The TRACE analysis results are compared with experimental data and with previously obtained results from analyses made with the RELAP5/MOD3.3 Patch 03 model.

This work has been performed with financial support from the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/15/2014 18:27:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Beaver Valley 2 Docket (050- 00412)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR173 - Physical conditions LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR143 - Tracking / trending LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

433

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

650

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 12
#### Reuben M'Clenahan *v*. John Thomas.

^From ltedell.

¡Sueing *in forma-.pauperis*— The true- meaning of the act of 1787 *is,*that all such persons shall give security for costs, as would he liable for coste, if they fail in their suit. It does not render anyperson 3iable-fbr costs, who was not so before. The Statute of 23d Henry-VITcih. 15, excuses paupers from the payment of costs. This Statute and the act of 1787, are compatible & in *pari materia,*and should be construed together. Persons may therefore sue in this State in *forma pauperis,*upon satisfying the Court that they have a reasonable ground of action, and from extreme poverty are unable to procure security.

This was an application to the court for leave to sue in *forma pauperis,*founded upon an affidavit of the plaintiff, that he was not worth five pounds sterling, and had no property except such as the law allows insolvent detr tors to *retain;*and that he verily believes, he had good title to the lands for which he wished to institute suit.

The only question in the case was, whether in this state, a person can sue in *forma pauperis.*The question was submitted without argument, and,

TayxoR, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The act of 1787, does not demand a construction -which would necessarily deprive a portion of the community of ail means of having their claims investigated in a court of justice; And unless necessity required it, we are not disposed to put such a construction upon it. The true meaning of the 1 w seems to be, to require all *248such persons;to give security previously, to taking out a writ, as would have been liable for the payment of costs in the event of failing in the suit. But it does not ren* der any person liable to the payment of costs, who was-not so, before. Now the statute of 23 *Henry VIL ch. 15,*excuses paupers from payment of costs. And a law founded «pon principles of such obvious justice,, ought to bo repealed by express words or necessary implication, before the court hastens to-that conclusion. For, indeed, the two statutes are perfectly compatible, and being in *pari materia,*should both have operation, and may be construed together. On this ground, we think that persons may sue in this state, in *form a pauperis,*upon satisfying the court that they have a reasonable ground of action, and from their extreme poverty are unable to procure security.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,398,998
<SECURITIES>                                 7,633,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,441,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,137,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,221,413
<PP&E>                                      11,768,988
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,729,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,148,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,704,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,492
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,572,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,148,228
<SALES>                                      9,075,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,763,440
<CGS>                                        5,088,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,203,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             350,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,831,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,831,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,831,975
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Union Drilling, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Christopher D. Strong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to his knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Christopher D. StrongName:

Christopher D. StrongTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 4, 2011
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against 25 Dryout Experiments Conducted at the Royal Institute of Technology (NUREG/IA-0009)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0009 (PDF 2.12 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** October 1986

**Prepared by:** A. Sjoberg, D. Caraher

Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate S-102 52 Stockholm, Sweden

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

RELAP5/MOD2 simulations of post-dryout heat transfer in a 7 m long, 1.5 cm diameter heated tube are reported. The Biasi critical heat flux correlation is shown to be inadequate for predicting the experimental dryout. RELAP5 accurately predicted the measured temperatures downstream of the dryout once it was forced to predict dryout at the experimentally measured location.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Sept. 29, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>We are aware of the two ballistic missile launches and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.3






Exhibit 10.3


Summary of Amended Reimbursement
Arrangement Between

Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. and Each of Roberts
Properties, Inc. and

Roberts Properties Construction, Inc. (effective
January 1, 2011)


Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. will
reimburse each of Roberts Properties, Inc. (“Roberts Properties”)
and Roberts Properties Construction, Inc. (“Roberts Construction”)
the cost of providing consulting services in an amount equal to an appropriate
hourly billing rate for an employee multiplied by the number of hours that the
employee provided services to Roberts Realty. For the purpose of this
arrangement, the appropriate billing rate is calculated by multiplying an
hourly cost rate for an employee (which is defined as the employee’s
salary, plus benefits paid by Roberts Properties or Roberts Construction,
divided by 2,080 annual hours) by a factor of 1.7, or 1.8 for Roberts Properties’
Chief Financial Officer.





6
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 17, 2004          /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
                                 Chief Financial Officer



                                       41
No: 19-041 August 23, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Approves License Transfer for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the transfer of the Pilgrim Nuclear 

Power Station license from Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc., to Holtec International, as owner, and 

Holtec Decommissioning International, as decommissioning operator. 

The three companies requested the license transfer in November 2018. Once the purchase is 

finalized, Holtec and HDI have announced plans to expedite decommissioning and dismantling of 

the plant. The license transfer includes the dry cask spent fuel storage installation at Pilgrim. The 

NRC order approving the license transfer is effective immediately, but the license transfer will not 

be finalized until the successful completion of the transaction between Entergy, Holtec and HDI. At 

that point, the NRC will issue a license amendment reflecting completion of the transfer. 

Pilgrim is a boiling water reactor located in Plymouth, Mass., approximately 38 miles 

southeast of Boston. It permanently ceased operations in May.

In reviewing the license transfer application, the NRC staff considered the Holtec and HDI 

technical and financial qualifications, the adequacy of Pilgrim’s decommissioning trust funds to 

complete the radiological decommissioning of the plant, and the adequacy of plans to manage the 

onsite storage of spent nuclear fuel until it can be removed for storage or disposal elsewhere. The 

staff concluded that Holtec and HDI met the regulatory, legal, technical and financial requirements 

necessary to qualify as licensees.

The NRC order approving the transfer was issued Aug. 22. The order and other documents

related to the review are available through the NRC ADAMS online documents database.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Advanced NDE for Steam Generator Tubing (NUREG/CR-6638)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6638 (PDF - 3.80 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 1999**Date Published:** January 2000

**Prepared by:** S. Bakhtiari, D. S. Kupperman

Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439

J. Muscara, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6487

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report provides an assessment of various advanced nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques for inservice inspection of steam generator tubing. Selected results are presented on the application of data processing and visualization techniques; data analysis, including depth sizing and the development of correlations between eddy current signals and tube failure pressure by multivariate regression and neural networks; inspection of sleeved tubes; applications of ultrasonic NDE; and related work on emerging NDE technology.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit 13.1

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shih-Jye Cheng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda)
LTD. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being
furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: December 31, 2014



/s/ Shih-Jye
ChengName:

Shih-Jye ChengTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Nuclide Importance to Criticality Safety, Decay Heating, and Source Terms Related to Transport and Interim Storage of High-Burnup LWR Fuel (NUREG/CR-6700)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6700 (PDF - 3.30 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2000**Date Published:** January 2001

**Prepared by:** I.C. Gauld, J.C. Ryman

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6370

D.D. Ebert, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6479

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report investigates trends in the radiological decay properties and changes in relative nuclide importance associated with increasing enrichments and burnup for spent LWR fuel as they affect the areas of criticality safety, thermal analysis (decay heat), and shielding analysis of spent fuel transport and storage casks. To facilitate identifying the changes in the spent fuel compositions that most directly impact these application areas, the dominant nuclides in each area have been identified and ranked by importance. The importance is investigated as a function of increasing burnup to assist in identifying the key changes in spent fuel characteristics between conventional- and extended-burnup regimes. Studies involving both pressurized water-reactor (PWR) fuel assemblies and boiling-water-reactor (BWR) assemblies are included. This study is seen to be a necessary first step in identifying the high-burnup spent fuel characteristics that may adversely affect the accuracy of current computational methods and data, assess the potential impact on previous guidance on isotopic source terms and decay-heat values, and thus help identify areas for methods and data improvement. Finally, several recommendations on the direction of possible future code validation efforts for high-burnup spent fuel predictions are presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6558

CURTIS NIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WOLFE, Officer,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-192)

Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Nixon, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III,

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Nixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Nixon v. Wolfe, No. CA-00-192 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14,

2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED