alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Preliminary Assessment of PWR Steam Generator Modelling in RELAP5/MOD3 (NUREG/IA-0113)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Summary

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0113 (PDF 1.08 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** July 1993

**Prepared by:** R. J. Preece, J. M. Putney

National Power Technology and Environmental Centre Kelvin Avenue Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7SE, United Kingdom

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Summary

A preliminary assessment of Steam Generator (SG) modelling in the PWR thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD3 is presented. The study is based on calculations against a series of steady-state commissioning tests carried out on the Wolf Creek PWR over a range of load conditions. Data from the tests are used to assess the modelling of primary to secondary side heat transfer and, in particular, to examine the effect of reverting to the standard form of the Chen heat transfer correlation in place of the modified form applied in RELAP5/MOD2. Comparisons between the two versions of the code are also used to show how the new interphase drag model in RELAP5/MOD3 affects the calculation of SG liquid inventory and the void fraction profile in the riser.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No: 19-013 March 12, 2019

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200

NRC Renews Seabrook Station Operating License

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating license of Seabrook Station for 

an additional 20 years.

Seabrook’s license will now expire March 15, 2050. The single pressurized-water reactor is 

located in Seabrook, N.H., about 13 miles south of Portsmouth. The operator, NextEra Energy 

Seabrook, submitted the renewal application in May 2010.

The NRC’s review of the application proceeded on two tracks. A safety evaluation report was 

issued in September 2018, and a final supplemental environmental impact statement was issued in 

July 2015. These documents, as well as other information regarding the Seabrook license renewal 

application, are available on the NRC website. 

The renewal review accounted for the discovery of a rare concrete degradation issue, 

“alkali-silica reaction” at Seabrook. NextEra applied in August 2016 to amend Seabrook’s license for 

appropriate analysis of ASR-affected components. The NRC approved the amendment on March 11. 

More information on the ASR issue is available on the NRC website. The NRC’s Advisory Committee 

on Reactor Safeguards also reviewed the staff’s work on the license renewal application and 

recommended its approval.

With the renewal of the Seabrook operating license, 94 commercial nuclear power reactors have 

received renewed licenses (four of those have since permanently shut down). Three applications for 

subsequent license renewal are currently under review. Information about reactor license renewal is 

available on the NRC website.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsConference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors

# Proceedings of the 2002 Nuclear Safety Research Conference, Held at Marriott Hotel at Metro Center Washington, DC, October 28-30, 2002 (NUREG/CP-0180)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CP-0180

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2003**Date Published:**March 2003

**Compiled by:** S. Monteleone, Meeting Coordinator

S. Nesmith, NRC Project Manager

**Proceedings prepared by:** Brookhaven National Laboratory

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report contains papers presented at the 2002 Nuclear Safety Research Conference at the Marriott Hotel at Metro Center in Washington, DC, October 28–30, 2002. The papers were presented in each of the conference's seven breakout sessions over the course of the three days. They describe progress and results of programs in nuclear safety research conducted in this country and abroad. International participation in the meeting included papers presented by researchers from France, Japan, Norway and Russia. The titles of the papers and the names of the authors have been updated and may differ from those that appeared in the final program of the meeting.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
NO. 07-07-0079-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C MARCH 23, 2007

______________________________ ERASMO GON ZALES, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 69 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F DALLAM CO UNTY; NO. 3320-8; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ. ErasmoGonzales, appellant, attempts to appeal from an order denying his “‘Petitio n for Redress of Gr ievance’”and his “‘M otion for Nunc Pr o Tunc.’” The cou rt s igned the order on December 4, 20 06. Appellant then fi l e d a n o t i c e o f a p p e a l o n M a r c h 5 , 2 0 0 7
. We dismiss for w

ant of jurisdic

tion.2

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day the tri al court enters an appeal able order or within 90 days after t hat date if a motion for new trial is filed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a). No motion for ne w trial having been filed, appellant's notice of appeal was d ue to be filed Januar y 3, 2007. Bec

ause the recor

d discloses that appellant’s notice of appeal was r eceived by

this court on March 5, 2007 , without seeking an extension of the deadline, T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3, the notic e of appeal was late. Atimely fil ed notice of appeal i s essential to invoke ou r appellate j urisdicti on. Olivo v . Sta te , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1996). If it is untimely , we can tak e no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id . at 523. Appellant's notice be ing untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dism iss the appeal. Accordingl y, appellant ’s appeal isdismissed. Brian Quinn Chi ef Justice Do not publish
.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Claudio M. Guazzoni, Chief Executive Officer of Zanett, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (“the Company Form 10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Company Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Claudio M. Guazzoni

June 8, 2011Claudio M. Guazzoni – Chief Executive Officer

Date
No. 86-5921.

#### Ruta *v.*Massachusetts.

App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      8,850,602
<SECURITIES>                               24,963,036 
<RECEIVABLES>                              17,757,404 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           59,055,615       
<PP&E>                                     42,967,836      
<DEPRECIATION>                             10,194,525    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            117,901,874      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      14,020,091    
<BONDS>                                    21,593,185  
<COMMON>                                      250,022 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 83,335,420       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              117,901,874         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           21,228,730          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              17,138,350          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              272,777       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,817,603       
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,450,900      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                2,366,703 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .09 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .09 
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Customization of XTV Graphics Output in TRACE v5.0 Patches 5, 4 & 3 (NUREG/IA-0514)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0514 (PDF – 5.06 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** February 2019**Date Published:** August 2019

**Prepared by:** O. Zerkak and I. Clifford

Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland

K. Tien, NRC Project Manager

Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange Under the Thermal-Hydraulic Code Applications and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

**Published by:** U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report describes a developmental patch applicable to TRACE v5.0 that provides the user with additional flexibility in using the existing option graphlevel to specify the list of variables to be included in the graphics output file (XTV). This option is activated from the TRACE input model using newly added Namelist option lists graphCustId and graphCustVar.

This capability, referred to as the XTV-Customize option, is particularly indicated to optimize storage space and/or post-processing memory space for production studies that require large input models, and for research studies that include sensitivity analysis or uncertainty quantification involving very large number of TRACE simulations of a same input file.

The XTV-Customize option is provided in the form of three separate code installation patches applicable to versions v5.0p5, v5.0p4 and v5.0p3 of the TRACE code, respectively.

The developed patch has been verified on the LCLRS Linux 64-bit servers of PSI for a representative sample of test cases, and for the two different TRACE output graphics file formats, namely XTV and DMX. This patch should nevertheless be still considered as developmental. Some recommendations for improvement of the implementation are provided at the end of the report.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 82-5973.

#### Cook *v.*Florida Parole and Probation Commission.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
sl ieloWd; 

Douglas 

petition in Docket No. 66961 does not articulate a basis for relief, we are 

not persuaded by his argument in Docket No. 66848 that his 

constitutional rights were violated by being required to attend the status 

conference in person.' Accordingly, we deny the writ petition in Docket 

No. 66961. 

It is so ORDERED. 

, J. 

Hardesty 

, J. 

,J. 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Russell 

Demetras & O'Neill 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

'Russell's writ petition in Docket No. 66961 also appears to take 

issue with the district court's decision to not strike a document filed by the 

defendant. A review of the November 7, 2014, order, however, reveals no 

discussion or ruling on such an issue. Accordingly, we decline to further 

consider that issue. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (requiring the petitioner to provide 

this court with the documentation necessary to understand the matters 

set forth in the writ petition). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 24

                                Power of Attorney

<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Directors and Officers
of Mykrolis Corporation (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and appoint C.
William Zadel, Jean-Marc Pandraud, Bertrand Loy and Peter W. Walcott and each of
them individually, their true and lawful attorneys and agents to execute on
behalf of the Corporation the Form 10-K Annual Report of the Corporation for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all such amendments or additional
instruments related thereto which such attorneys and agents may deem to be
necessary and desirable to enable the Corporation to comply with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any
regulations, orders, or other requirements of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission thereunder in connection with the preparation and filing of
said documents, including specifically, but without limitation of the foregoing,
power and authority to sign the names of each of such Directors and Officers on
his behalf, as such Director or Officer, as indicated below to the said Form
10-K Annual Report or documents filed or to be filed as a part of or in
connection with such Form 10-K Annual Report; and each of the undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be
done by virtue thereof.

     SIGNATURE                            TITLE                      DATE
     ---------                            -----                      ----

    /s/ C. William Zadel           Chairman, Chief Executive  February 27, 2003
  --------------------------         Officer and Director
    C. William Zadel

    /s/ Richard A. Aurelio              Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Richard A. Aurelio

    /s/ Michael A. Bradley              Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Michael A. Bradley

    /s/ Robert E. Caldwell              Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Robert E. Caldwell

    /s/ Michael P.C. Carns              Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Michael P.C. Carns

    /s/ Daniel W. Christman             Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Daniel W. Christman

    /s/ Thomas O. Pyle                  Director              February 27, 2003
  --------------------------
    Thomas O. Pyle
No. 90-659.

#### Gollust et al. *v.*Mendell et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
No: IV-19-007 March 25, 2019

Contact: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Proposes $116,000 Civil Penalty to Southern California Edison

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $116,000 civil penalty to Southern 

California Edison Co. for two violations of NRC requirements related to an Aug. 3 fuel-loading 

incident. The San Clemente, Calif., plant, owned by Southern California Edison, permanently 

ceased operations in 2013.

The violations related to the failure to ensure the availability of important safety equipment 

to provide redundant drop protection for a spent fuel canister during downloading operations into a 

storage vault. The violations also included failure to make a timely notification to the NRC 

Operations Center following the incident. The violations are described in an NRC special inspection 

report dated Dec. 19, 2018.

NRC held a pre-decisional enforcement conference on Jan. 24 in Arlington, Texas, to 

discuss preliminary findings identified by the special inspection team. The event was open to public 

observation and available via a webcast. A letter sent to the company provided details about the 

proposed civil penalty.

Southern California Edison has 30 days to dispute the fine or request involvement of a 

neutral third-party mediator to resolve the issues. The company has committed not to resume fuel 

loading without NRC approval.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/23/2010 09:28 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |07/02/2010 02:13 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |SI RICE population and control cost information | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Cortney, Attached is the information on the population breakdown for existing SI RICE and the cost of controls that you asked about during our briefing yesterday. Note that our information from engine manufacturers and landfill gas engine operators is that there are no landfill gas engines smaller than 500 HP so our estimates reflect that. I'm also attaching a memo that breaks down the HAP emissions into the different pollutants, see the sheet for "Natural Gas" on the next to last page of the pdf file. Please let me know if you need anything further. Have a nice weekend. (See attached file: Existing SI RICE population and cost info for OMB 7-2- 10.xls)(See attached file: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0030-0009 HAP EF for small engines.pdf) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
II 

Calendar No. 318 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1858 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4514 Williamson Trail in Liberty, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT RYAN SCOTT OSTROM POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 4514 Williamson Trail in Lib7 erty, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom Post Office’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1858 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Ryan 

5 Scott Ostrom Post Office’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 318 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1858 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRyan Scott Ostrom Post Office’’. Liberty, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant al Service located at 4514 Williamson Trail in 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20037

NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. and

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Successor Indenture Trustee,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-882)

 January 5, 1998

Before WISDOM, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs and the record. We have heard the arguments of counsel

regarding this appeal. The district court committed no reversible error. The judgment is

AFFIRMED.
ex41.htm


 



	
NUMBER


     00

	
SHARES







 


Advanced Credit Technologies, Inc.


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA


Authorized to Issue 100,000,000 Shares Common Stock At $.001 Par Value


 


This Certifies That ____________________________________ is hereby issued __________________________________________fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the Stock of the above named Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


 


In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer and its Corporate Seal to be hereunder affixed this ______ day of _________A.D._______.


 


 



	
_________________________


Secretary

	
_________________________


President