alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00096

- CV

REV. LEO GRAVES, Appellant
V. CITY OF CARTHAGE, AND BRENDA SAMFORD, CITY MANAGER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 123rd District Court Panola County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- 304

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### ORDER
Gerald J. Smith, counsel for the appellant, Rev. Leo Graves, has filed a motion to extend time to file the appellant’s brief. The brief was due October 1, 2013. In his motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time. This Court interprets Rule 10.5(b) (2) of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure as requiring counsel to provide the Court with specific information to justify the requested extension, including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials, how lon g those trials are expected to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the
rule. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(2).
All future motions to extend time must contain case

- specific information adequate to justify the request, or they will be denied. In this instance, we grant the motion for an extension, for a period of twenty

- one days, making appellant’s brief now due October 22, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: October 2, 2013
#### Aric CARNEGIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 80-9001

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1982.

Marilyn S. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

*483Karen Fagin White, Macey & Zusmann, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Before HILL, KRAVITCH and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to discharge, through bankruptcy proceedings, an indebtedness resulting from a student loan. The bank handling the loan, Adel Banking Co. filed a timely proof of claim. The claim subsequently was transferred to appellee Georgia Higher Education Assistance Corp. (GHEAC). Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 302(d), the bankruptcy court approved the transfer to GHEAC. The bankruptcy court also entered an order holding appellant’s student loan to be dischargeable. On appeal, the district court, 6 B.R. 1011, reversed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that the loan was dischargeable but affirmed approval of the transfer from Adel to GHEAC. We affirm both actions of the district court.

Appellant’s argument that his student loan is dischargeable fails under the decision of the former Fifth Circuit in *In re Williamson,*665 F.2d 683 (5th Cir. 1982) (Unit B).1 Similarly unavailing is appellant’s charge that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in approving the transfer of claim from Adel to GHEAC. Although GHEAC’s proof of claim did not become official until after the applicable time period had elapsed, this filing did not create a new claim. Rather, it constituted a substitution of parties with no change in the nature of the claim against appellant. Accordingly, GHEAC’s filing related back in time to the original filing by Adel and therefore was not untimely. *See*Fed.R. Civ.P. 15(c); *Fidelity & Deposit Co.*v. *Fitzgerald,*272 F.2d 121, 129 (10th Cir. 1959), *cert. denied,*362 U.S. 919, 80 S.Ct. 669, 4 L.Ed.2d 738 (1960); *In re Whicker,*47 F.2d 106, 108 (5th Cir. 1931). *See generally*Advisory Committee’s Note to Bankruptcy Rule 302. In light of the circumstances giving rise to the tardy claim by GHEAC, we cannot say that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in allowing the claim. *Cf. Adams v. Evans,*642 F.2d 173 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding abuse of discretion as the standard of review for a bankruptcy court’s decision on whether to allow claims). Because the district court properly upheld this approval of transfer, its judgment is

AFFIRMED.

1

. *Williamson*is adopted as the law of this circuit. *Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.,*667 F.2d 33, 34 (11th Cir. 1982).
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Owners of Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6500, ORNL/TM-13297/R2, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6500, Revision 2 (PDF - 277 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**September 2001**Date Published:**March 2002

**Prepared by:** R.L. Reid, V.S. White Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2009 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-8051 Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC

R. Wood, NRC Technical Monitor

**Prepared for:** Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code J2436 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Commercial nuclear power plants in this country can be owned by a number of separate entities, each with varying ownership proportions. Each of these owners may, in turn, have a parent/subsidiary relationship to other companies. In addition, the operator of the plant may be a different entity as well. This report provides a compilation on the owners/operators for all commercial power reactors in the United States. While the utility industry is currently experiencing changes in organizational structure which may affect nuclear plant ownership, the data in this report is current as of August 2001. The report is divided into sections representing different aspects of nuclear plant ownership:
        - Nuclear Power Plant Percentage Ownership Ordered by Plant Name
        - Nuclear Power Plant Percentage Ownership Ordered by Utility Name
        - Utility/Company Relationships Ordered by Parent/Holding Company
        - Utility/Company Relationships Ordered by Subsidiary
        - Nuclear Power Plants Listed by Operator
        - Nuclear Power Plants Listed by Plant Name
        - Nuclear Power Plants Listed by State 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1502 

To terminate the EB–5 program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate the EB–5 program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF EB–5 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) REPEAL OF PROVISIONS.—Effective on the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, the following provisions are 

6 repealed: 

7 (1) Section 203(b)(5) of the Immigration and 

8 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)). 

9 (2) Section 204(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration 

10 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(H)). 

11 (3) Section 216A of the Immigration and Na12 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1186b). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1502 IH

1 (4) Section 610 of the Departments of Com2 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Re3 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (8 U.S.C. 

4 1153 note). 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Beginning on the date of the 

6 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Secu7 rity— 

8 (1) shall cease to accept petitions and applica9 tions under any authority repealed under subsection 

10 (a); and 

11 (2) shall dismiss all pending petitions and appli12 cations described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# A Review of the Limerick Generating Station SevereAccident Risk Assessment: Review of Core-Melt Frequency (NUREG/CR-3493, BNL-NUREG-51711)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-3493 (PDF - 7.26 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 1984 **Date Published:**July 1984

**Prepared by:** M.A. Azarm, R.A. Bari, J.L. Boccio, N. Hanan, I.A. Papazoglou, C. Ruger, K. Shiu, Department of Nuclear Energy  Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973

J. Reed, M. McCann Jack R. Benjamin Associates, Inc.

A. Kafka Boston College 

**Prepared for:** Division of Safety Technology Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC FIN A-3393

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A limited review is performed of the Severe Accident Risk Assessment for the Limerick Generating Station. The review considers the impact on the core-melt frequency of seismic- and fire-initiating events. An evaluation is performed of methodologies used for determining the event frequencies and their impacts on the plant components and structures. Particular attention is given to uncertainties and critical assumptions. Limited requantification is performed for selected core-melt accident sequences in order to illustrate sensitivities of the results to the underlying assumptions.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### Breckenridge and others, Respondents, vs. City of Watertown, Appellant.

*May 12*

October *13, 1931.*

*432For the appellant there were briefs by *R. W. Lueck*of Watertown, city attorney, and *Olin & Butler*of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by *R. M. Rieser*of Madison.

*W. N. Powers*of Beaver Dam, for the respondents.

The following opinion was filed June 12, 1931:

Nelson, J.

This case is ruled by the decision announced this day in *Christoph v. City of Chilton, ante,*p. 418, 237 N. W. 134, wherein it is held that sec. 62.075, Stats., as enacted by ch. 353 o.f the Laws of 1929, is unconstitutional, void, and of no effect.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson county is reversed, with directions to dismiss the petition.

Owen, Fritz, and Wickhem, JJ., dissent.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on October 13, 1931.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 Gamma Assessment For Down To Top Reflooding Process At VVER Like 37-Rod Bundle (NUREG/IA-0207)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0207 (PDF 10.37 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** July 2002

**Prepared by:** A.S. Devkin

Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute" Kurchatov Square 1 123182, Moscow, Russia

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.2.2 Gamma for down to top reflooding at VVER like 37-rod bundle is presented. The experiment have been performed at IPPE test facility at the following parameters: upper plenum pressure- 0,246 MPa, cooling water temperature- 51°C, water velocity- 4.91 sm/s, average linear heat flux density at maximal heat production zone before water supply-1,77 kWt/m. RELAP5/MOD3.2.2Gamma assessment showed that code gives satisfactory results for all parameters behavior. The main discrepancies were get for cladding temperature behavior at level H-2.7m, where the calculated cladding temperatures exceed experimental data approximately on 75 K. Computed quenching time for this level are much higher experimental ones. For other levels accordance between experimental and RELAP data is rather good.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Laraby, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 355]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that the verdict is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). We further conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion by its *Sandoval*ruling that defendant could be cross-examined with respect to his prior sexual abuse, rape and robbery convictions, but not with respect to five prior acts of misconduct, including two uncharged rapes and assaults. The record shows that the court, in making its *Sandoval*ruling, carefully balanced the probative value of the acts of misconduct against the potential for undue prejudice. The fact that the prior convictions of defendant for sexual abuse and rape are similar to the crimes presently charged does not preclude their use on cross-examination *(see, People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292; *People v Cowell,*170 AD2d 343, *lv denied*77 NY2d 993; *People v Cain,*167 AD2d 131, 133, *lv denied*77 NY2d 836).

We reject the contention of defendant that prosecutorial misconduct on summation mandates reversal. Although the prosecutor on summation made inflammatory comments and improperly elicited sympathy for the complainant *(see, People v Grice,*100 AD2d 419, 422; *People v Ivey,*83 AD2d 788, 789), reversal is not mandated because those comments did not deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v Roopchand,*107 AD2d 35, 36, *affd*65 NY2d 837).

We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Davis, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7056

RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT KELLY, Sergeant, HRRJ; OFFICER GOVIA, Officer, HRRJ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00889-CO-TCB)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, 

Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7056 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Sergeant Kelly 

and Officer Govia summary judgment on Lassiter’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7056 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 91-6285.

#### Poteet *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2530

_____________________________
L ITECRETE , I NC ./S UMMIT C ONSULTING , LLC
, Appellant s ,

v.

E DGAR Z AMBRANO , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margret G. Kerr , Judge

.
Date of Accident: April 19, 2014.

March 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 H. George Kagan of H. George Kagan, P.A., Gulf Stream
, for Appellant s

. Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale
, for Appellee.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# COMPBRN III: A Computer Code for Modeling Compartment Fires (NUREG/CR-4566, ORNL/TM-10005)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-4566 (PDF - 5.75 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 1985**Date Published:**July 1986

**Prepared by:** Vincent Ho, Nathan Siu, George Apostolakis Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles  Los Angeles, California 90024 Under ORNL Subcontract No. 19X-22270 George F. Flanagan, ORNL Program Manager and Principal Investigator Engineering Physics and Mathematics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box X Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy  Under Contract No. DE-AC05-84OR21400

Ben Buchbinder, NRC Monitor

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Analysis and Operations Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Under Interagency Agreement DOE 40-550-75

NRC FIN B-0493 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The computer code COMPBRN III deterministically models the behavior of compartment fires. This code is an improvement of the original COMPBRN codes. It employs a different air entrainment model and numerical scheme to estimate properties of the ceiling hot gas layer model. Moreover, COMPBRN III incorporates a number of improvements in shape factor calculations and error checking, which distinguish it from the COMPBRN II code. This report presents the ceiling hot gas layer model employed by COMPBRN III as well as several other modifications. Information necessary to run COMPBRN III, including descriptions of required input and resulting output, are also presented. Simulation of experiments and a sample problem are included to demonstrate the usage of the code.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
ex10_7f8k09162010.htm


Exhibit 10.7


 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 




 


Party A                     :           China INSOnline Corp.


 


PartyB                      :           Liu Lu (刘璐)(Identity Card no.:130203197805150323)


 


 


 


Whereas Party A demand for operating cashflow and borrow a loan from Party B, both Party A and Party B agree the terms as below:







 


1.              Loan amount: USD Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty-Two Only for settlement of NOBO list, printer and relevant expenses.


 







 


2.              Loan interest: Annual rate at 3%, from the date of borrowing to repayment, both days inclusive.  For interest calculation, there is 360 days per year.  Loan interest is payable on the repayment of loan.


 







 


3.              Repayment: Before June 30, 2011.  If Party A could not repay in cash, Party B has right to request the same value of stock issued by Party A.  Any delay repayment is subject to late charges of 0.1% per day.


 







 


4.              This Agreement in duplicate and each party has one.


 







 


Party A:                                                                           Party B:


 


China INSOnline Corp.                                                      Liu Lu (刘璐)


 







 







 







 


/s/Wang Zhenyu                                                                 /s/ Liu Lu


 


December 20, 2010                                                            December 20, 2010
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against ECN-Reflood Experiments (NUREG/IA-0112, ECN–C—92–008)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0112 (PDF 2.05 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** July 1993

**Prepared by:** A. Woudstra, J. P. A. Van De Bogaard, P. M. Stoop

Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN Service Unit General Services P. O. Box 1, NL-1755 ZG Petten The Netherlands

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As part of the ICAP (International Code Assessment and Applications Program) agreement between ECN (Netherlands Energy Research Foundation) and USNRC, ECN has performed a number of assessment calculations with the computer program RELAP5.

This report describes the results as obtained by ECN from the assessment of the thermohydraulic computer program RELAP5/MOD2/CY 36.05 versus a series of reflood experiments in a bundle geometry. A total number of seven selected experiments have been analyzed, from the reflood experimental program as previously conducted by ECN under contract of the Commission of the European Communities (CEC). In this document, the results of the analyses are presented and a comparison with the experimental data is provided.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC to Meet with Public to Discuss License Termination Plans for Trojan Nuclear Plant

----

----

RIV: 99-41 December 2, 1999

 

**NRC to Meet with Public to Discuss License Termination Plans for Trojan Nuclear Plant**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public to hear comments and answer questions on the plan for terminating the commercial operating license of the Trojan Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, held by Portland General Electric Company.

The meeting will be Tuesday, December 7 from 7-9 p.m. at the Best Western -- Oak Meadows, 585 S. Columbia River Highway, St. Helens, Oregon.

All interested citizens are invited to attend and ask questions or comment on the license termination plan as submitted to the NRC by PGE on August 5. PGE officials will make a short presentation on the details of the plan, and NRC officials will discuss applicable regulations.

A copy of the termination plan is available for review at the Branford Price Millar Library, Portland State University, 934 S.W. Harrison, Portland, OR, 97207; and at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L St. N.W., Washington, D.C., 20037.

The Trojan Nuclear Plant began commercial operation in May 1976 and was shutdown permanently in January, 1993. The plant currently is being dismantled and decontaminated. The reactor vessel, which represented 99.9 percent of the remaining radioactive material, excluding the spent fuel, was removed from the site in August. Spent fuel will be stored in a dry cask storage facility at the site until a permanent U.S. repository is available.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 15, 2014
Dustin Fife, San Juan County Library Director Blanding Library, San Juan County 25 West 300 South Blanding, UT 84511 Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Blanding Library for public inspection Dear Mr. Fife: The purpose ofthis letter is to requestthatthe Blanding Library retain the enclosed documents atthe library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision forthe proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration amendment permitforthe McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or keIly.shaheerah(li~epa.gov ifyou have any questions. Sincerely,

Shaheerah “elly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures