alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3265-3266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine 
Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES: Thursday, February 5, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.; and Friday, 
February 6, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

[[Page 3266]]


PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: Thursday, February 5 at 10:00 a.m.--Closed; Friday, February 6 
at 8:30 a.m.--Open; and Friday, February 6 at 10:30 a.m.--Closed. (Via 
notational voting, the Temporary Committee of the Board of Governors of 
the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public 
observation its meeting scheduled for February 5 and a portion of the 
meeting scheduled for February 6, 2015, in Washington, DC).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, February 5, at 10:00 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Pricing.
    3. Financial Matters.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board governance.

Friday, February 6, at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Temporary Emergency Committee.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    3. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    4. Committee Reports and Assignments.
    5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.
    6. Quarterly Service Performance Report.
    7. Tentative Agenda for the April 13 and 14 Meeting.

Friday, February 6, at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Continuation of Thursday's closed session agenda.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. 
Moore, at 202-268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary, Board of Governors.
[FR Doc. 2015-01091 Filed 1-20-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I,
Peter G. Traber, M.D., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Galectin Therapeutics, Inc.; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2017

/s/ Peter G. Traber

Peter G. Traber, M.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive
Officer)
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 25, 2022


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pharmaceutical ProductDevelopment, Inc. (“PPD”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Baddour, Chief Financial Officer of PPD, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPD as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

 

Date: November 7, 2005
No. 82-5854.

#### Morgan *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Stay America, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, andSecretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

 

(1)                   the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 12, 2003 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|                          | /s/ GREGORY R. MOXLEY |   |
|                          | Gregory R. Moxley |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2008

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10th day of November, 2004.



| | /s/ Calvin L. Kantonen 
Calvin L. Kantonen
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1707 

To apologize for the treatment of Italian Americans during World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Ms. LOFGREN (for herself and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To apologize for the treatment of Italian Americans during 

World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ITALIAN 

4 AMERICANS DURING WORLD WAR II. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Over 15 million Italians have immigrated to 

7 the United States since 1852. 

8 (2) Italian immigrants have provided a culture 

9 and heritage that has enriched American life. 

10 (3) The treatment of Italian Americans during 

11 World War II was authorized by the Act of July 6, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1707 IH

1 1798 (Chapter 66, Sec. 1; 1 Stat. 577; 50 U.S.C. 

2 21; commonly known as the Alien Enemies Act). 

3 (4) Additional authority for the treatment of 

4 Italian Americans during World War II was based 

5 on Executive Order 9066 (7 Fed. Reg. 1407) and 

6 Executive Order 9102 (7 Fed. Reg. 2165). 

7 (5) These orders required Italian-born citizens 

8 and their families to carry identification cards, face 

9 travel restrictions, and obey curfews. 

10 (6) These orders authorized the seizure of per11 sonal property. 

12 (7) 10,000 Italian Americans living on the West 

13 Coast were forced to leave their homes and were 

14 prohibited from entering coastal zones during World 

15 War II. 

16 (8) Thousands of Italian American immigrants 

17 were arrested and hundreds were interned in mili18 tary camps during World War II. 

19 (9) The treatment of Italian Americans during 

20 World War II needs to be acknowledged in order to 

21 remember those whose lives were unjustly disrupted 

22 and whose freedoms were violated. 

23 (10) Acknowledging and apologizing for the 

24 treatment of Italian Americans during World War II 

25 would help repair the Italian American community 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1707 IH

1 and would discourage the occurrence of similar in2 justices and violations of civil liberties in the future. 

3 (b) STATEMENT OF CONGRESS.—For these funda4 mental violations of the basic civil liberties and constitu5 tional rights of Italian Americans during World War II, 

6 Congress apologizes on behalf of the Nation. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Argued and submitted September 14,

affirmed December 10, 1979

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JAMES EDWARD MARQUARDT, *Appellant.*

(No. 24540, CA 14367)

603 P2d 1198

Warren John West, Bend, argued the cause for jellant. With him on the brief were Forcum, West & jck, and Leonard C. Parker, Bend.

W. Benny Won, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, lied the cause for respondent. With him on the brief re James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.

*516Before Tanzer, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Campbell, Judges.

THORNTON, J.

*517THORNTON, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of possession of a ntrolled substance (ORS 475.992(4)) and assigns as ror the denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of search of his house on the ground that the affidavit rming the basis for the issuance of the warrant Lowed on its face that the information contained in e affidavit was stale. The warrant was sought and sued on February 3, 1979. The allegations of the ■fidavit came largely from personal observations ade at the same house on the alleged date of "Februy 03, *1978.*”

Relying on the rule that probable cause must be termined from the "four corners” of the affidavit, the information properly before the magistrate, fendant contends the information was stale as a atter of law and the warrant invalid. This argument without merit. It hardly seems likely that the af-tnt would wait exactly one year from the date he tained his information and then seek a warrant at p.m. Based on this circumstance, the magistrate, if noticed the error at all, could properly conclude that was a clerical error and that the date referred to was bruary 3, 1979. There is no contention that the 'idavit was otherwise insufficient to establish probable cause. The error was a result of the haste of minal investigation and to treat it in any other inner is to apply a hypertechnical standard of review disapproved by the United States Supreme Court. *United States v. Ventresca,*380 US 102, 108, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965). *See also State v. Diaz,*29 Or App 523, 528, n 3, 564 P2d 1066 (1977).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         5092317
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         7505295
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   61768983
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        21417420
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          21747033
<LOANS>                                      425087043
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3586150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               532767328
<DEPOSITS>                                   438560352
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            9349084
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7703337
<OTHER-SE>                                    77154555
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               532767328
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               25845461
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4564166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              30409627
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            16664730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            16664730
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         13744897
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   180000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              186415
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1038133 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9247200
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     9247200
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6112859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3406150
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3586150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            914750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2671400
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41266 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS MARTINEZ, also known as Jesus Martinez-Leanos, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-535-1

-------------------- October 17, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jesus Martinez appeals following his conviction of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. His sole argument on appeal is the he was denied his right to allocution at the sentencing hearing when the district court refused to consider a letter from Martinez’s ex-wife which purportedly discussed hardships the family would suffer due to Martinez’s incarceration. Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32, the district court, before imposing sentence, must “address the defendant personally andNo. 99-41266 -2- determine whether the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(C). To comply with this rule, there must be some type of interaction between the sentencing court and the defendant demonstrating that the defendant understood that he had the right to speak on any subject before being sentenced. United States v. Myers , 150 F.3d 459, 462 (5th Cir. 1998). The record illustrates not only that Martinez was afforded his right to allocution at sentencing but also that he addressed the court and that the district court considered the information Martinez presented. AFFIRMED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNRC Maps

# NRC Maps of Radioactive Waste Sites

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement States
          - Decommissioning Sites
          - Emergency Preparedness Maps
          - Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)
          - NRC Regions
          - Nuclear Materials Facilities
          - Power Reactors
          - Radioactive Waste Sites
          - Research and Test Reactors
          - Uranium Recovery Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
July 6, 2015

Mr. Michael Sleeper

255 Silver Road

Bangor, ME 04401

Dear Mr. Sleeper:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1513) on 

May 7, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 82-1102.

#### Grey *v.*City of Philadelphia et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.