alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,640
<SECURITIES>                                       105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,845
<INVENTORY>                                     67,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               299,999
<PP&E>                                          15,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,963
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           664
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,607
<SALES>                                         93,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,381
<CGS>                                           57,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   387
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Navy, Partner Nation Navies Conclude Submarine-Tracking Exercise

Petty Officer 1st Class Glenn Slaughter

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In the Matter of Herman Bonilla, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 674]

Determination of respondent New York State Department of Social Services dated December 22, 1994, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed the determination of the New York City Department of Social Services to terminate petitioner’s Home Relief, Medical Assistance and Food Stamp benefits based upon his failure to comply with the Home Relief Job Search Program, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Richard Lowe, III, J.], entered March 1, 1995) dismissed, without costs.

There is no issue in this case with respect to whether or not petitioner was "employable” within the meaning of Social Services Law § 158-b (1). The agency was required to make that determination at the time of his certification or recertification for benefits (Social Services Law § 158-b [1]), and the issue was, in any event, conceded by petitioner in correspondence and a resume that he forwarded to the agency on or about April 15, 1994 in an attempt to argue that he was not then "ready” to participate in the employment program.

Petitioner admitted upon the record of the December 16, 1994 proceeding that he received the notice dated October 11, 1994, requesting his appearance at the offices of respondent Human Resources Administration to discuss his job readiness or the reasons why he believed he was not ready to participate in the program at that time. He also admitted, in his petition, that he received the November 3, 1994 Notice of Conciliation, requesting that he appear for conciliation on or before November 17, 1994. There is no dispute that petitioner failed to appear at either the conference or for conciliation. This *527Court will not second-guess the agency’s determination that petitioner’s forgetfulness did not provide good cause or an adequate excuse for his failure to appear for either of the two scheduled appointments *(see, Matter of Corripio v Blum,*74 AD2d 555). Moreover, while petitioner’s purported medical disability may have provided a basis for a determination that petitioner was not "job ready” had he appeared for the scheduled appointment or conciliation, he forfeited his right to present that argument before the agency by failing to appear on or before the scheduled dates. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive Officer

I, John Brian Nichols, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of First American Scientific Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: May 10, 2005 | /s/ John Brian Nichols                   
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                   | John Brian Nichols                       
|                   | President and Principal Executive Officer



---
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Primer on Lean Six Sigma (NUREG/BR-0470)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG BR-0470 (PDF - 545.25 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** January 2010

Office of Executive Director for Operations

## Abstract

In 2007, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) launched an initiative to develop Lean Six Sigma capability at the NRC. The agency deployed a Lean Six Sigma program to improve the quality and timeliness of products and services, increase efficiency, and improve operational effectiveness.

This primer is part of an effort to communicate Lean Six Sigma knowledge throughout the NRC. It provides readers with basic information about Lean Six Sigma and the Lean Six Sigma program activities at the agency. The primer is organized into the following three parts:
        - Part 1 presents an overview of Lean Six Sigma, including its benefits and implementation difficulties.
        - Part 2 provides a general practice guide for Lean Six Sigma.
        - Part 3 describes the Lean Six Sigma infrastructure, internal resources, and potential applications at the NRC.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6011

PHILLIP CLINE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

D. J. HARMON, Acting Warden; MIKE SNOW, Unit Manager; MR. 

THOMPSON; DR. DOMINICK MCLAIN, D.O.; FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

PRISONS, All in their official and individual capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, 

District Judge. (5:11-cv-00870)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Cline appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on Cline’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Cline v. Harmon, No. 5:11-cv-00870 (S.D.W. Va. 

Dec. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# NRC To Discuss Performance at Fitzpatrick Nuclear Plant

----

----

**NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR PLANT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, June 6, to discuss the NRC Reactor Oversight Program Annual Assessment for the New York Power Authority's James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will be held at 10:00 a.m. in the FitzPatrick Training Center Auditorium, at the plant site in Scriba, NY. At its conclusion, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from interested observers.

Issuance of the reviews was announced in NRC news release No.00-085 - www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/nrarcv/00-085.html. The Assessment Letter can be found on the agency's web site: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/fitz2000.html.

FitzPatrick was one of 13 nuclear power plants that participated in a six-month pilot evaluation of the NRC's revised reactor oversight program. No significant performance problems were identified at any of the 13 plants. 

All commercial nuclear power plants (with the exception of the two D.C. Cook plants, due to their extended shutdown) are now being evaluated under the revised reactor oversight process initiated on April 2. The NRC expects to make additional refinements to the program during its first year of implementation. 

As part of the new program, each plant will receive an assessment letter every six months which will include a 12-month inspection plan that may be updated periodically to reflect changes in nuclear power plant performance and NRC resource allocations. Updated information on plant performance is being posted to the NRC web site every quarter at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

I, Larry B. Prescott, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of T.J.T., Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisQuarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this Quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisQuarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)                                      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation, and

 

c)                                      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)                                      all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)                                     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.

 

 

 
| /s/Larry B. Prescott    |
|-------------------------|
| Larry B. Prescott       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 14, 2004       |

 

1

----
# - dep

west virginia department of environmental protection 

# SIGN-IN SHEET

Public Hearing on the Division of Air Quality Rules 45CSR8

, 45CSR14, 45CSR16, 45CSR18

, 45CSR19, 45CSR25, 45CSR30

, 45CSR34

, 45CSR35

and 45CSR42

July 11

, 201 1

, 6:00p

. m.

The Department of Env ironmental Protection asks for the information b elow so that agency staff may provide responses and information about

decision s to you. The information you voluntarily provide on thi s s heet becomes part ofthe public record related to this topic and may b e released if requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

Name (please print)

# fcJ~ 

# _ _J \

# Ke~ I:

.. l

# '{/~ {\ )

# ~**)( ~**  _"\ 

# fJo VI 

### V 

# A t1 11 

### '<- 

# f1

e<_u ( 

# .....-./ v

. ) lr A1 ' c;, 

## 7\-

_ , ,..,..
M I 

### Kt 

## tv\'\ Y'l'-ltOQ.. (\ '(\ '-1

( I 

## f I 

### JohV\.. 

## C!A v rs e'\Se"' 

# I !"Q £,,:>£ :.

# ~**~** L R. t-1-1,) 

# d E (_

DaN C,/J < PZ;"' e. Address Or ganization Phone E-mail Comment



### YIN

"Z. b330 

### £T'-

## IJI?**~** <..J.z7

## c.-Jo**\.Uv oul** **·** ....

## 1~**)** b c.ttlz'Z-,.-.,n. l

## R.t,.s**.-...~ "fA** **~R Cb··** **·· d**  f/

# J'tJ!ff~~~§l?-§~t 1-\l'j**'r'<f4~~.€... ,1-v~'l**  f{o;JP

fvt. 

### cA..c...A rv 'f

.. o/tV 

### ev-., U5(;J

## fR.} 3 C>o \ Z-VZ**G__ h**  ..... 

### v..-v**?..k ~s'-1** 



### 5t z_ S**T<>"""<-~** <-1 C K 

### te.**.** M**J~~-rC.n** N**s~f....d** G w v z 5'fo"2..

At\JI. :L,I.{"\

### ~ "l. '{ 

### 0 

# ve.JAk.**~** 

# -\--**t"'to ,j\** **to~** vN

7 

# U)- J 

# -TJ!!P ,/)UC- I

Jp

### Mvy~hlt.~l<..-**~** 

## /""',**Of-.Jf..J~ 61** **v~ £1/~** **~** 

# y

>r 

## &;rf.4 

# ctttj 

# I 

# Jot-J-1r ;f 'J"Ko!'C';" P,Jwr/'1

, 

# '/**!4 ~~.k~**  

## 1 017 -o3 l q 

# I**u.. """'{P.~** **~~,** .... 

### .,!

## ~"f**k,o** )O'i- 

# I**I~** 

### u 

# (- c O'-'"-'C t L 1 7 

## s"'**-~so5 --.~**  c.'-< R£@.

### y~l'tVtl. 

## c 1 ""' AJ

WV 

### 4 MoM 

## I**.!o~"'.l** Sl.75 l

### C~"'t-L~,**~7 (.'f'\~••** **fC"'l •**  •



### 'f 

### f<

, -1- U.J 1 1r 

### J r g..,. c.w- 1!5.-cfUx.- r

.. 

## l u**co. ~,/&n** **~13.** 

### 3 

## 7{/**~** '-:? 

## y

Promoting a healthy environment

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0120 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACOB JON IDLAND,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2023

01/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0120
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Orders Payment of $900,000 Fine from Thermal Science for Violations of NRC Requirements

----

----

No. 99-94 May 4, 1999

**NRC ORDERS PAYMENT OF $900,000 FINE FROM THERMAL SCIENCE FOR VIOLATIONS OF NRC REQUIREMENTS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff, rejecting a company protest, has issued an order requiring Thermal Science, Inc., (TSI) of St. Louis, to pay a $900,000 fine proposed in 1996 for misrepresentations made to the NRC concerning its Thermo-Lag fire barrier products.

The order is the latest in a series of measures NRC has taken since the agency began considering enforcement action against TSI in 1995 after an investigation determined that the company misrepresented the level of involvement of a test laboratory, Industrial Testing Laboratories, Inc., (ITL), in fire barrier and other tests.

Investigators also found that Thermal Science misrepresented the respective levels of involvement of the company and of test laboratories, including ITL, in the testing of Thermo-Lag products when it provided test reports and other documents, knowing that they contained inaccurate and/or incomplete information.

Results of the NRC investigation were forwarded to the U.S. Department of Justice, which presented the matter to a grand jury that indicted TSI and its president on charges of conspiracy and making false statements to the NRC. Both the company and its president were acquitted of all charges following a criminal trial that ended in August 1995.

In 1996, the NRC proceeded with civil action, citing TSI for nine violations of its regulations. Each violation consisted of one or more statements made to the NRC which were either knowingly "inaccurate or incomplete." The NRC staff informed TSI that it intended to impose a fine of $100,000 for each violation, for a total proposed penalty of $900,000. By law, the company had 30 days to pay the fine or protest it.

TSI responded by filing a motion in U.S. District Court challenging the legality of the fine on the grounds that (1) it constituted double jeopardy, and (2) NRC lacks authority to fine non-licensees. The District Court dismissed TSI's suit last year. TSI has appealed, but the appeals court has denied a motion for a stay of NRC's administrative process.

After the District Court ruling, TSI filed an answer to the NRC's enforcement action, denying all of the violations. The NRC staff has reviewed this and found the arguments to be without merit. Accordingly, the staff has issued an order imposing the civil penalty.

Thermal Science has 30 days to pay the fine or request a hearing.

A copy of this enforcement action is available upon request from the NRC's Office of Public Affairs. It also has also been posted on the Internet.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021