alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES:

Thursday, February 5, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.; and Friday, February 6, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

      ( print page 3266)    

# PLACE:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# STATUS:

Thursday, February 5 at 10:00 a.m.—Closed; Friday, February 6 at 8:30 a.m.—Open; and Friday, February 6 at 10:30 a.m.—Closed. (Via notational voting, the Temporary Committee of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting scheduled for February 5 and a portion of the meeting scheduled for February 6, 2015, in Washington, DC).

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

### Thursday, February 5, at 10:00 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Pricing.

3. Financial Matters.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board governance.

### Friday, February 6, at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Temporary Emergency Committee.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.

3. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.

4. Committee Reports and Assignments.

5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.

6. Quarterly Service Performance Report.

7. Tentative Agenda for the April 13 and 14 Meeting.

### Friday, February 6, at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)

1. Continuation of Thursday's closed session agenda.

# GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION:

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at 202-268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary, Board of Governors.

[FR Doc. 2015-01091 Filed 1-20-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE P
4800 South 188th Street 

SeaTac, WA 98188-8605 

City Hall: 206.973.4800 

Fax: 206.973.4809 

TDD: 206.973.4808 

Mayor 

Terry Annipr~(1n 

Deputy Mayor 

Gene Fisher 

Coun2i1members 

Rick Forschler 

Tony Anderson 

Ralph Shape 

Pam Fernald 

Mia Gregerson 

Interim City Manager 

Todd Cutts 

City Attorney 

Mary Mirante Bartolo 

City Clerk 

Kristina 

March 17,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 


United States Department ofTransportation 


1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 


Washington, DC 20590 


Reference: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf ofthe City of SeaTac, I am writing to express our enthusiastic 

support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new, nonstop service between 

Seattle an<!T <:l~!l_aneda Internatiogal Airpo~H 

Seattle and Washington State has been an extremely important U.S. gateway for 

Japan with strong historical, cultural, and business ties. It is also a hub ofthe 

entire Pacific Northwest region, fueled by our hometown carriers Alaska and 

Horizon Air, which provide connections to 55 US cities for the proposed 

Tokyo-Haneda route. Delta's service from Seattle to Asia has long been 

successful and Seattle's enplanements show stronger growth than peer airports 

in recent years. Service between Seattle and Haneda is a natural addition for 

Delta's West Coast gateway. 

Washington State is already the most trade-dependent state in the country. 

Delta's new service to Haneda will create direct and immediate economic 

benefits for our region. Delta currently employs over 1,400 in our state and we 

expect the number to grow as they develop their presence in Seattle. 

Our region's business travelers look to the convenience of flying into Tokyo's 

downtown Haneda airport, without having to transit to Los Angeles, San 

Francisco, or Vancouver, BC. The Department has the opportunity to ensure 

_._._._th~t Seattle cOlltinues to grow as an important international gateway and should 

approve the frequencies proposed by Delta to serve Haneda. 

We respectfully ask the Department ofTransportation for its consideration of 

Delta Air Lines' request. 

C: City Council 

TAA:lke 

The Hospitality City
#### CHRISTINE PURNELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE CITY OF BRIDGETON; ELMER BRIGGS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF WELFARE FOR THE CITY OF BRIDGETON; AND DOROTHY DAVIS, AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF WELFARE FOR THE CITY OF BRIDGETON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Submitted March 22, 1977

Decided June 21, 1977.

Before Judges Matthews, Seidman and Horn.

*532
      *Ms. Linda G. Rosenzweig,*Camden Regional Legal Services, Inc., attorney for appellant *(Mr. Michael S. Berger,*Farmworkers Rights Project Civil Liberties Education and Action Fund of the American Civil Liberties Union, of counsel).

*Mr. Allan H. Harbert,*attorney for defendants-respondents.

*Mr. William F. Hyland,*Attorney General, attorney for intervenor-respondent Department of Institutions and Agencies, Division of Public Welfare *(Mr. Stephen Skillman,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; *Mr. Richard M. Hluckan,*Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Testa’s reported opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      35,303,000
<SECURITIES>                                37,370,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,577,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            79,417,000
<PP&E>                                      41,641,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,413,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,533,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,109,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,820,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,533,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,650,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,263,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             410,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,902,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,902,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,902,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**8/11/10 Draft Cost Analyses**

Please note that these are draft works in progress , and the anal ys es will continue to be draft until the rules are proposed in June 2011. We will have better information by the 8/25 /10 outreach meeting and better information after that. We are still gathering information from individual companies. We will consider additional cost and other information that the SERs, OMB, and SBA provide. As described in the plan for the cost and economic anal ys es, we look not only at costs per model , but also at the combined costs and econ o mi c impacts for companies that have multiple model lines and multiple products categories, e.g., wood stoves, pellet stoves, and fireplaces. To help with this endeavor, we will appreciate review of the updated combined list of certified products.

**Some G**  **eneral O**  **bservations:** There is no apparent relationship between the retail price of today ’s wood stoves and the emissions performance. Looks and size are more important factors. We are interested in addition al information on this market phenomenon. There does appear to be a significant difference in retail price between old design , inefficient hydronic heaters and those that have qualified for Phase 2 of the EPA voluntary program or better . This initial pri ce difference for the consumer appears to be quickl y recovered b y the lower fuel costs for the much greater efficiency of the qualified models. However, retail demand for the qualified models still trails that of the less efficient designs. We are interest ed in additional information on this market phenomenon. Fireplace uncontrolled model retail prices are quite different for manufactured fireplaces versus site

- built fireplaces. The consumer choice of a manufactured fireplace versus a site

- built model appe ars to be independent of emission considerations. The differences in retail price for models that have qualified for the EPA voluntary program differ widel y, depending greatl y upon their looks and intended buyer category , e.g., overall cost of the home. W e are interested in better ways to characterize this phenomenon. Several SERs have suggested that development of a significantly new model costs greater than $250,000. We are also interested in the estimates from other SERs.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ryan D. Lake, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                  |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Ryan D. Lake, CPA                                            |  | 
|                       |  | Ryan D. Lake, CPA                                                |  | 
|                       |  | Director of Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ralph Bartel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Travelzoo Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;
and c. disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants fourth quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting; 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. TRAVELZOO INC.By:     /s/ Ralph BartelRalph BartelChairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, and
Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 30, 2005
Felix-Simao Kiloso 6942 Hazeltine Avenue, Apt. 7 Van Nuys, CA 91405

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary ofTransportation United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Secretary Foxx, May 13,2015

Re: DocketNo. DOT-OST-2015-0082

Airtravel is already too expensive, and for no discernible reason. Itravel between the United States, Africa, and Europe on a regular basis for business, and the cost offlights can sometimes be overwhelming. Ifthe Open Skies agreements that the United States entered into with foreign nations are modified to disallow international airlines from competing in the free market, travelers can expect prices to go up and service to go down even further.

In the 1980's, there was an airline called People Express that offered flights from Los Angeles to Brussels for $200. They proved to be too competitive in price, and the big airlines broke People Express until it had to go out ofbusiness. Now, the same flight costs $1,500. In comparison, a flight from Brussels to Kinshasa in the Congo costs only $300. Ifthe United States airline industry convinces the federal government to alter Open Skies to solely favor its own economic interests, ticket prices could rise so high that they may preclude many people from engaging in international business. Anybody who flies internationally on a frequent basis already knows that flights can be uncomfortable because airlines pack as many people into a plane as they can. The service is often discourteous, as well. By preventing competition between carriers, and by freezing foreign airlines out ofthe market altogether,
a change in the Open Skies agreements will allow a few American carriers to control the skies and international flights. The agreements work, and the government should not intervene in airtravel on a few companies' behalf.



# s 10-150519-024Felix-Simao Kiloso 6942 HazeltineAvenue, Apt 7 Van Nuys, CA 91405



# s 10-150519-024 The HonorableAnthony Foxx Secretary ofTransportation United States Department ofTransportation ATTN: Docket Center Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
20S9C: 

### '1111

## J I JJ 1

### 1111

### )11~1/i**~1**

## ulll'1 '' /J 11

## 1JI',J

### 1 

## ill''''''

## 1'' 1

## 11''1

### i~ii
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06037]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8238]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient 
Times'' Formerly Titled ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in 
Biblical Times''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 12, 2011, notice was published on page 63341 of the 
Federal Register (volume 76, number 197) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``The Dead Sea 
Scrolls: Life and Faith in Biblical Times.'' The referenced notice was 
corrected on October 19, 2012, by a notice published on pages 64373-
64374 of the Federal Register (volume 77, number 203) to change the 
exhibition name to ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient 
Times'' and to include additional objects as part of the exhibition. 
Today's notice is being issued to include an additional object in the 
exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that an additional object to 
be included in the exhibition ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in 
Ancient Times,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, is of cultural significance. The additional object 
is imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
additional exhibit object at the Cincinnati Museum Center, Cincinnati, 
OH, from on or about March 18, 2013, until on or about April 13, 2013, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 8, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-06037 Filed 3-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISMAEL SOLIS

- VILLEDA, AKA Ismael Solis, AKA Ismael Villeda Solis,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 18

- 70316 Agency No. A205

- 711

- 939

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2021 * *

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges

. Ismael Solis

- Villeda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application s for cancellation
of removal and adjustment of status

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 70316

We review de novo questions of law

. Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.
The IJ did not err in reopening the record of proceedings, where in petition

No. 15

- 70696 , this court granted the government’s motion to remand, in part, to
further develop the record concerning Solis

- Villeda’s conviction, and Solis

- Villeda did not petition for rehearing of that decision. See Olivas

- Motta v. Whitaker , 910 F.3d 1271, 1280 (9th Cir. 2018) (“an administrative agency may not deviate from a supervising court’s remand order”). The BIA did not err in concluding that California Health and Safety Code (“ CHSC ”) § 11377 (a) is divisible and in ap plying the modified categorial approach
to determine that Solis

- Villeda’s conviction is a controlled substance offense that renders him ineligible for cancellation of removal and adjustment of status

. See
8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 1229b(b)(1)(C) , 1255(i)(2)(A) ; Coronado v.
Holder , 759 F.3d 977, 984

- 85 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding CHSC § 11377(a) is divisible with regard to substance and subject to the modified categorical approach).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
.