alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Emergency Preparedness & Incident Response (NUREG/BR-0342, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Mission

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0342, Revision 2 (PDF - 1.26 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** January 2011

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

## Mission

The mission of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is to license and regulate the Nation's civilian use of nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
OZ+Z.CS OF TZ-ZE ATI-ORNEY GENE@AL OF’TEXA5 

. 

>.i ., 

AUSTiM . 

t 

Qarrocnuad 

m- 2’ 2: : 

. j. (a 

- - _.: 
‘. . 

i 

. . 

S8tlat6 Bill Xo. 398; bh. 242, Ganoral t12Ir.l 

‘. 

Speeie.1.. Laws, 4.7th T&g;. , provides in part: 

"'SoctI;ion 1.A -- 

of 3ny incxqorated 

Thnt the p;ovsmir~ b&y 

city In $hio Stats my 1~542~ 

celva tkrou~h &Xi or dodicoki.or, snA is hereby 

oilp0X;islMl to acquire, by purchoso %it!lGUt eon- . 

dunmtion or by pumhaso throu,$ co:r0amH,ion 

plracrwx35qs, sod there&tar mlntnin onC operate 

8s an strport, or 1ea?sc, or salX, to tho Ycdoral 

bovarment, -tracto of lc;rd e5.thor nithin 02 

without; t&6 ‘corpo2ats lfrdtn of such city and 

within the county in urhich ouch city Is situated., 

ml Shci Cotiseioner~~ Conrt of. any county nay 

lUwifiso ucquuirc, fialntcln .and operate for like 

purpose tracts of lend withia the btiits OS tha 

COWlI;~. 

. IttB -- .That’ she (loveming body of any 

5Jlcorporatca csty in t&ii3 state R3y reoo5.vc 

wtJmx~& gift oz1 &aicatLon, and is hereby mpo+ 

cred to acquire, b~r.purchme without cordazuation,,. 

end thereaSter xisintein ruM operate as ah, atiport, 

0s 3ease; 02 sell to the~‘T&iIeral GoVornmnt, 

tracts of ~&ml :dthoMi tha county in rd&-h such ~lty~ ~. 

is oitu3tsb, p+3m0a c&i triscts zwe not with;tn~., ‘, .‘~, 

rive (~).&len bf ano%her inoorporatad oity that ,’ 

has a populatio?l of mro~than SiSteen huGi?od (1500) ~ 

people, eccdr6igg to the. Iwt precadirg Faderal 

'Cen3c3,~~* - 

._ 

: 

. 

. 

_. 
. . 

. 

. 

Prior to ths anactmxt Of s. B. 398, c&es 

h>& 5KtJiOrity t0 3Ci&ro Ull& CQXZc?t5 5b~Ol$E! Uild&‘~ 

Ii. S.'l6(r, 41st Leg., but such authority extcnds8 ozlly 

t3 the coqM.sition of airports r;ituatoC wholly dthin 

t.>e county in With the city wss loaatd. T&u mod for 

futhority for cities to acquire airport land outside 

the couaty xvi3 the basis or" the ener@enaoy cleaso of 

3, ii. 392. The diffxwum neda bet-.vean counties onil 

citice quits cviitently vies a c~neoioue one on the 

pri of the Legislatnre. 

57hU.e S. 33. 433, Ch. Il.&?, Ganeral ena Special 

Lsv1.3, 47th Lug., psobsbly Is xot appl.i.cftblo, as it is, 

onsctod to proviCe for tfie ac#sition.+T 1enCrs VOX 

the USC of the P&ml Govmment~~. it is notsd that Zt 

6180 provides that the land so aoquixe8 by (1 ooaty nust 

lie r;itMll the J&lits or ouch covnty. 

Bintin~ no otatute ox codstitntiosal p~ovIsioa 

0xqrBssly giving authorSt,u to a county tcJ acqusre litnO 

oid3ido it23 bounilsries for nlrport pllQOSG8, nor froa6hiuh the po-aer could bo rortsombLy tiplied, -88 am 

ccxpullql to anums you- quorstion in the negative. 

.
No. 99-50681 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50681 Summary Calendar

ROBERT A. CHICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus W.K. BALDRIDGE; W.L. BAYS; HOWARD L. SUBLETT; SHERRI ADELSTEIN, District Clerk, 16th Judicial District, Denton County, Texas; JIM WILLETT, SR., Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-173-SS

-------------------- May 10, 2000 Before POLITZ, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Former Texas state prisoner Robert A. Chick seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim based upon Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Even were Chick able to show that Heck requirements do not bar his claim, his appeal would lack arguable merit because it would be time-barred. See Henson-El v. Rogers , 923 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir. 1991). We find that Chick’sNo. 99-50681 -2- contention that he only discovered in 1998 that fraud had been committed in connection with his 1948 conviction to be without arguable merit. We also find Chick’s argument that the time bar and Heck doctrine do not apply to him because he is proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1655 and/or Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 to be without arguable merit. Chick’s motion to supplement the record, to the extent that it requests introduction of evidence outside the record is DENIED. Because Chick’s appeal lacks arguable merit, it is frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Chick’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is therefore DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OTHER OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Nonradiological Health Consequences from Evacuation and Relocation (NUREG/CR-7285)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7285 (PDF - 15.83 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2021**Date Published:**September 2021

**Prepared by:**T. Adams1L. MacMillan1R. Casagrande1M. Osborn1A. Huff1T. Smith21Gryphon Scientific, LLC6930 Carroll Ave, Suite 810Takoma Park, MD 209122U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555Todd Smith, NRC Technical MonitorAmy Sharp, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 05, 2021
Washington Bancorp
      Computation of Earnings per Common
      Share
      Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
                                                      For the three months                          For the six months
                                                       ended  December 31,                          ended December 31,
                                              ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
                                                2000      1999      2000        1999       2000        1999      2000       1999
                                                Basic .. Basic     Diluted     Diluted     Basic      Basic     Diluted    Diluted
                                                 EPS      EPS        EPS         EPS        EPS        EPS        EPS       EPS
                                              ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
Computation of weighted average
  number of common shares
  outstanding:

Common shares outstanding
      at the beginning of the period............651,133   651,133   651,133     651,133     651,133     651,133    651,133  651,133

Unreleased common shares held by the
      Employee Stock Ownership
      Plan (ESOP) at the beginning
      of the period ............................(32,066)  (36,845)  (32,066)    (36,845)    (33,283)    (37,972)   (33,283) (37,972)
Weighted average common shares
      released by the ESOP during
      the period ...............................    609       564       609         564       1,218       1,127      1,218    1,127
Weighted average common shares
      outstanding - Stock Option Plan .........       -         -     7,219       7,736           -           -      7,302    9,425
Weighted average common shares
      into treasury                            (119,962)  (54,526) (119,962)    (54,526)   (114,864)    (53,220)  (114,864) (53,220)
                                              ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
Total average shares outstanding                499,714   560,326   506,933     568,062     504,204     561,068    511,506  570,493
                                              =========================================== ==========================================
Net income                                    $ 241,510 $ 278,511 $ 241,510   $ 278,511   $ 503,406  $  501,276   $503,406 $501,276
                                              =========================================== ==========================================

Net income per share .......................  $    0.48 $    0.50 $    0.48   $    0.49   $    1.00  $     0.89   $   0.98  $  0.88
                                              =========================================== ==========================================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.19
 CHANGE IN CONTROL /
SEVERANCE / RETENTION AGREEMENT
 Effective Date Foothills Employee
 RECITALS
 Board
    1. TERM OF AGREEMENT Term
 2. DEFINITIONS
 Accrued Compensation
 Base Amount
 Cause




---



##### 



Change in Control
 Exchange Act
  Prior Shareholders
  Company
 Disability




---



##### 



Notice of Termination
 Successors and Assigns
 Termination
     Termination for Other Reason




---



##### 



Section 2.10(b)
 Voluntary Termination
 3. PAYMENTS
 Termination for Cause, Disability, Death, or a Voluntary Termination
 Change in Control or Termination Payment
 Section 3.2(b) Section 3.2(b)(1) Section 3.2(b)(2) Section 3.2(a)




---



##### 



Section 3.2(a)
    Retention Payment
 Mitigation of Payments
 Tax Withholding Section 3
 Exclusivity of Payments Section 3
 4. Notice of Termination Provided by Company




---



##### 



Section 2.3
 5. SUCCESSORS; BINDING AGREEMENT
   6. NOTICE
 7. NON-EXCLUSIVITY OF RIGHTS Section 3.6 Section 3.6
 8. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS Section 3.5




---



##### 



9. MISCELLANEOUS
 10. GOVERNING LAW
 11. SEVERABILITY
 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT




---



##### 



EMPLOYEE
 /s/ Michael L. Moustakis
 FOOTHILLS RESOURCES, INC.
 /s/ Dennis B. Tower
October 24, 2014

Mr. Brian Burkett 5430 Lauby Road C/O McKinley Air FBO North Canton, OH 44720

Dear Mr. Burkett:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 135.152 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your October 14, 2014, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2014- 0853), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michelle Ferritto Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3

Project No.: AXX-xx-xxx-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-104:TAdams:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx ARM-1/100/104:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[ Insert Stylewriter Score Here ]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Condensed  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  as  of  March  31,  1999  and  the
     Consolidated Statement of Income  for the three months ended March 31, 1999
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         33,947
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                      325
<INVENTORY>                                     4,573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               54,186
<PP&E>                                          7,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                  5,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,338
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            9
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,460
<SALES>                                        13,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,507
<CGS>                                           5,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.20
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Prana Biotechnology Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Revelins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


      /s/ Richard Revelins*
      ------------------------
      Richard Revelins
      Chief Financial Officer

      September 24, 2004

      * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc E. Bruner, President (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


/s/ MARC E. BRUNER
-------------------------------------
Marc E. Bruner
President (Chief Executive Officer)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.2 Against a Main Steam Isolation Valve Closure at TRILLO I Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG/IA-0172)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0172 (PDF 1.51 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2000

**Prepared by:** A. de Lucas, R. L. Perezagua Empresarios Agrupados, AIE Spain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report includes an assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.2 against a main steam line isolation at 99% power in Trillo I NPP (PWR, KWU-Siemens, 1040 MWe).

The results used are those obtained during test D-100-306 (Ref. 3), performed August 19, 1988 at Trillo I NPP.

The three plant cooling loops are simulated to take into account:
        - A single loop containing a valve in which the disturbance occurs
        - The remaining two loops are simulated using two separate model loops

The Trillo I model used comprises 273 control volumes, 297 junctions, 101 heat structures and 252 control variables. 

From this study it can be concluded that the post-test calculation shows a reasonable agreement with the actual plant data.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JAMIT XAVIER DELGADO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 162 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulations Handbook (NUREG/BR-0053, Revision 6)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has discontinued publication of the NRC Regulations Handbook, NUREG-0053.  You may find the most current information on the Rulemaking Process at the NRC at "The Rulemaking Process" and in Management Directive 6.3, The Rulemaking Process (MD 6.3).

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0053, Revision 6 (PDF - 1.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** September 2005**Date Published:** September 2005

Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

## Abstract

This document is designed to assist NRC staff in drafting, preparing, and reviewing rulemaking documents for publication in the Federal Register. It is intended to serve as a guidance tool, and provides information relevant to each step in the rulemaking process. This revision reflects changes resulting from the consolidation of rulemaking policy matters into Management Directive 6.3, "The Rulemaking Process," and the placement of sample documents and some procedures on the NRC Rulemaker web site. This revision reflects various other changes that have occurred in the rulemaking process and in NRC procedures since the last complete revision of this document in 2001.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
ex10_6-f8k10102010.htm


Exhibit 10.6






 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 







Party A                      :           China INSOnline Corp.


Party B                      :           Liu Lu (刘璐)(Identity Card no.:130203197805150323)


 


 


Whereas Party A demand for operating cashflow and borrow a loan from Party B, both Party A and Party B agree the terms as below:


 


1.              Loan amount: USD Ten Thousand for settlement of legal fee.




 


2.              Loan interest:  Annual rate at 3%, from the date of borrowing to repayment, both days inclusive.  For interest calculation, there is 360 days per year.  Loan interest is payable on the repayment of loan.




 


3.              Repayment:  On or before December 31, 2010.  If Party A could not repay in cash, Party B has right to request the same value of stock issued by Party A.  Any delay repayment is subject to late charges of 0.1% per day.




 


4.              This Agreement in duplicate and each party has one.


 







 



	
Party A:


 

	  	
Party B:


	
China INSOnline Corp.

	  	
Liu Lu (刘璐)


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/s/Wang Zhenyu


 

	  	
/s/ Liu Lu


	
December 1, 2010

	  	
December 1, 2010
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Sets Enforcement Conference on Apparent Violations of NRC Radiation Protection Requirements at Zion Station

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-30

March 17, 1997

**NRC SETS ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE ON APPARENT VIOLATIONSOF NRC RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AT ZION STATION**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet March 19 with representatives of Commonwealth Edison Company for a predecisional enforcement conference on apparent violations at the Zion Nuclear Power Station. The facility is at Zion, Illinois.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. The meeting is open to public observation.

The meeting will focus on apparent violations of NRC shipping and radiation protection requirements which were identified during an NRC inspection in December and January.

The apparent violations include: using an outdated shipping procedure for radioactive materials; shipping radioactive material that exceeded radiation limits for that type of shipment; failing to measure representative samples of water treatment resins; failing to train two individuals adequately in procedures for shipping radioactive material; and removing equipment from a radiologically controlled area without surveying it first for contamination.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decisions on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021