alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Dennis George KING, Debtor. Hamilton BANK, Plaintiff, v. John W. THOMPSON, Jr., Esquire, Trustee for the Estate of Dennis George King and Dennis George King, Individually, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 1-81-00183.

Adv. No. 1-81-0271.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 24, 1981.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THOMAS WOOD, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiff seeks release from the automatic stay of lien enforcement imposed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. The lien concerned is one obtained by entry of a judgment prior to the filing of the debtor’s voluntary bankruptcy petition. The property involved is real estate owned by the debtor and his wife as tenants by the entir-eties. The debtor has claimed an exemption under the law of Pennsylvania as to his interest in the property. As a consequence, the debtor’s interest in the property is no longer property of the estate. See Code section 522(b). The debtor’s discharge was granted July 15, 1981.

The plaintiff based its claim for relief from the automatic stay on the provisions of Code 362(d). We consider that there is at this time another clear basis for relief. It is our judgment that the automatic stay *549which became effective when the debtor’s bankruptcy petition was filed has been terminated by operation of law under the provisions of Code section 362(c). The trustee’s right to stay protection as to the property terminated when the debtor exempted the property from the estate under the authority of Code section 522(b). The debtor’s right to stay protection terminated when his bankruptcy discharge was granted. Code section 362(c)(2)(C) so provides.

The valid liens that were in existence at the time of the filing of the bankruptcy petition may now be enforced unless they have been avoided, or are avoided hereafter. See Collier on Bankruptcy, 15th Edition, para. 524.01. Such being the case, the plaintiff’s claim for relief under Code section 362(d) is moot, now being without legal significance.

ORDER

The automatic stay provided by Bankruptcy Code Section 362 as to enforcement of the plaintiff’s lien against the subject property interest of the debtor is declared to be terminated by operation of law. The plaintiff may proceed with lien enforcement.
NovaGold Resources Inc.: Exhibit 4.8 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






CONSENT OF KIRK HANSON 

In connection with NovaGold Resources Inc.’s take-over bid
circular dated January 18, 2011 (the “Offer and Circular”) and registration
statement on Form F-8 originally dated January 18, 2011, and any amendments
thereto and any registration statements filed pursuant to Rule 429 under the
United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any documents incorporated
by reference therein (the “Registration Statement”), I, Kirk Hanson, hereby
consent to references to my name and to my involvement in the preparation of a
technical report entitled “Donlin Creek Gold Project, Alaska, USA NI 43-101
Technical Report” dated April 1, 2009 (the “Technical Report”) in the
Registration Statement and the Offer and Circular, and to the inclusion and
incorporation by reference of information derived from the Technical Report in
the Registration Statement and the Offer and Circular. 

DATED: January 18, 2011 

/s/ Kirk Hanson 
Name: Kirk Hanson
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590

REPLY TO THE AITENTION OF: 

### AT-I8J
Terry Sweitzer Illinois EPA, Division ofAir Pollution Control 1021 North Grand Avenue East P.O. Box 19276 Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

Dear Mr. Sweitzer,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reviewed and approved Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Annual Air MonitoringNetwork Plan. This plan encompassedthe monitoring network maintained by IEPA as well as Cook County Department of Environmental Quality. We expectthatthis plan will be in effectthroughout the 2008 calendar year. Ifunanticipated events arise that require any change, please notify and consultwith Region 

### 5 priorto implementing changes to the monitoring network. Region 

### 5 acknowledges the planning and resources ittook to compile, produce, seek comment, and submitthis plan. We appreciate the opportunity for Region 5to provide feedback on your plan, and we are pleasedto seethat our comments were addressed in the final draft.

IEPA's 2008 network plan indicates that the auto gas chromatography measurements in Chicago (Site ID 170310072) and Northbrook (Site ID 170314201). While the minimum required PAMS monitoring locations and frequencies (Table D-6 ofAppendix D to Part 58) are being met by IEPA, EPA encourages IEPA to continue the auto gas chromatography measurements during the PAMs season atthe Northbrookmonitoring site. EPA is currently performing a national-scale PAMs network assessment, the results ofwhich should be considered priorto making changes in the speciated VOC measurements.

As you are aware, Region 

### 5provided an extension ofthe deadline for submittingthe annual network plan in 2007. To be consistent with EPA's otherregional offices; the 2008 plans must be submitted to Region 5 by July 1,2008. Ifyou have any questions orconcerns, please contact LorettaLehrman at 312-886-5482. 

# q;;;:e--

LorettaLehrman, Section Chief Air Monitoring and Analysis Section

cc: Kevin Givens CookCounty Department ofEnvironmental Control 69 West Washington Street Ste 1900 Chicago, IL 60602

Recycled/Recyclable· Printed willl Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (50% Postcol1sumer)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01385]



[[Page 3951]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Briefing notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Date and Time: Friday, January 30, 2015; 9 a.m.-4 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Place: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Suite 1150, Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public 
Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the briefing and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84f7ede3eae8e5eae3f1e5e3e1c4f1f7e7e7f6aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee9d878980828f80899b8f898bae9b9d8d8d9cc0898198">[email protected]</span></a> at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: The State of Civil Rights at Immigration Detention 
Facilities
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman Castro
II. Issue Panel I--9:05 a.m.-10:35 a.m.: Federal Agency Guidelines and 
Standards of Care
    Speakers' Remarks and Questions from Commissioners
III. Issue Panel II--10:35 a.m.-12 p.m.: Private Detention Facilities & 
Standards of Care
    Speakers' Remarks and Questions from Commissioners
IV. LUNCH -- 12 p.m.-1 p.m.
V. Issue Panel III--1 p.m.-2:30 p.m.: Legal Challenges Associated with 
Immigration Detention Facilities
    Speakers' Remarks and Questions from Commissioners
VI. Issue Panel IV--2:30 p.m.-4 p.m.: Civil Rights Concerns Associated 
with Immigration Detention Facilities
    Speakers' Remarks and Questions from Commissioners
VII. Adjourn Briefing

     Dated: January 22, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015-01385 Filed 1-22-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D.,

CHILDREN,

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D22-2308

LT Case No. 2020-DP-000137

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed January 12, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Citrus County, 

Daniel B. Merritt, Sr., Judge.

Joseph Anthony Manzo, Largo, for

Appellant. 

Andrew Allen Feigenbaum, of 

Children's Legal Services, West 

Palm Beach, and Rachel Batten, 

of Children’s Legal Services,

Brooksville, for Appellee. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide 

Director of Appeas and Amanda 

Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of 

Statewide Guardian ad Litem 

Office, Tallahassee, and Ryan C. 

Tyler and Brooke M. Mesner, of
2 

Defending Best Interests Project, 

Ratzan, Weissman & Boldt, Boca 

Raton, for Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
No. 85-1480.

#### United States *v.*Merchants National Bank of Mobile.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Jersey Shore State Bank*v. *United States, ante,*p. 442.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cirond Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nicholas Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ NICHOLAS MILLER
------------------------------------
Nicholas Miller
Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1355** 

In re: VINCENT SHAMONT ROGERS ,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 7 :08

- cr - 00216

- MGL

- 2 )

Submitted : May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Vincent Shamont Rogers , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Vincent Shamont Rogers petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record d oes not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3579-3580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator or Foreign 
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Binghamton BOP LLC.....................  EG15-1-000
Lost Hills Solar, LLC..................  EG15-2-000
Blackwell Solar, LLC...................  EG15-3-000
Mesquite Creek Wind, LLC...............  EG15-4-000
Sky Global Power One, LLC..............  EG15-5-000
Heritage Stoney Corners Wind Farm I,     EG15-6-000
 LLC.
Western Antelope Blue Sky Ranch A, LLC.  EG15-7-000
Duke Energy Miami Fort, LLC............  EG15-8-000
Duke Energy Zimmer, LLC................  EG15-9-000
Spanish Town Estate Solar 1, LLC.......  EG15-10-000
Diageo USVI Inc........................  FC15-1-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of December 2014, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a).


[[Page 3580]]


    Dated: January 15, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01043 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 82-908.

#### Redhead, Co-Executrix of the Estate of Redhead, et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNRC Maps

# NRC Maps of Decommissioning Sites

On this page:
        - Locations of NRC-Regulated Sites Undergoing Decommissioning
        - Power Reactors Decommissioning Status
        - Sites and Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning

## Locations of NRC-Regulated Sites Undergoing Decommissioning

## Power Reactors Decommissioning Status

## Sites and Facilities Undergoing Decommissioning

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 15, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement States
          - Decommissioning Sites
          - Emergency Preparedness Maps
          - Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)
          - NRC Regions
          - Nuclear Materials Facilities
          - Power Reactors
          - Radioactive Waste Sites
          - Research and Test Reactors
          - Uranium Recovery Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 15, 2023
No: III-19-008 April 24, 2019

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663

NRC to Hold Open House to Discuss

2018 Performance of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of the Quad 

Cities nuclear power plant during an open house on May 2 in Port Byron, Ill.

The open house, to be held at the River Valley District Library, 214 S. Main St., will run 

from 5-6 p.m. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss the plant’s performance.

The two-unit Quad Cities plant, operated by Exelon Generation Co., LLC, is located 

approximately 20 miles northeast of Moline, Ill.

Quad Cities operated safely during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection findings and 

performance indicators were of very low safety significance. As a result, it remains under the 

NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight.

Inspections are performed by two NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from 

the Region III office located in Lisle, Ill.

The annual assessment letter for Quad Cities, as well as the notice for the open house, are 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also

available.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

KENNETH MISZLER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 259 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
No. 90-5193.

#### Mu’Min *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 894.] Motion of National Jury Project for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27176]

[[Page 92192]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 704 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-381, K2025-379.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27176 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### STATE v. GUS. GRAHAM.

A partial exchange of circuits between two of the Judges of the Superior Court, with the approval of the Governor, is legal.

*{State*v. *Watson,*at this term, cited and approved.)

Indictment for *Larceny,*tried before Schenck, J., at Spring Term, 1876, of Anson Superior Court.

The case was decided upon appeal in this Court at January Term, 1876, and is reported in 74 N. 0. Rep.

The cause coming on to be heard upon the certificate of this Court, at Spring Term, 1876, the prisoner’s counsel moved the Court to arrest the judgment upon the ground that his Honor Judge Schencio had no authority to hold that term of the Court. That the law does not authorize the exchange of two counties of a district unless the two counties constitute the entire district.

The motion was overruled and the prisoner appealed.

*Attorney General Hargrove*and *R. H. Rattle, Jr.,*for the State.

No counsel for the prisoner in this Court.

"Bynum, J.

The question raised here has been settled at the present term of this Court, in the case of the *State*v. *Watson.*It is there held that a partial exchange of circuits between two Judges, with the approval of the Governor, as here, is legal. Judge Sohencic, therefore, had jurisdiction and the right to pronounce sentence upon the defendant.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  EXHIBIT 4.2    
    

 






 



					
	Number

B-

	 	Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware	 	Shares

-0-

Cusip No.




 

  
 

  LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC.
  
    Series B Splitco Capital Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
  
    Specimen Certificate    
    


        This Certifies that
                                         
                                        is the owner
of
                                         
                                        FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES B SPLITCO CAPITAL COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC. (hereinafter called the "Corporation") transferable on
the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by
the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


        Witness,
the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

 










					
	Dated:	 	 	 	 
	

 	
 	
Liberty Splitco, Inc.

[Corporate Seal]	
 	

 
	






  President	 	 	 	






  Secretary




 

 








QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.2


LIBERTY SPLITCO, INC. Series B Splitco Capital Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Specimen Certificate
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ulises Acosta, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 518]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered October 27, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of *21⁄2*to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and bearing in mind that credibility is a matter to be determined by the jury *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932), there was sufficient corroboration of the child’s unsworn testimony.

Defendant’s claims relating to the integrity of the Grand Jury presentation are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find them without merit *(People v Darby,*75 NY2d 449, 455). We specifically note that there is nothing in the record before this Court to suggest that the translation provided by the Grand Jury interpreter was defective in any respect.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.