alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 49026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20003]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Arts Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one 
meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, as follows (ending times are approximate):
    Literature (application review): In room 716. This meeting will be 
closed.

DATES: September 11-13, 2012. September 11th--9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. EDT; 
September 12th and 13th, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. EDT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: August 10, 2012.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2012-20003 Filed 8-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3235-3236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f98d8b989d9c98979895808a908ab99f949ad79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f38781929796929d929f8a809a80b3959e90dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 012064-005.
    Title: Hapag-Lloyd/NYK Mexico-Dominican Republic Slot Charter 
Agreement.
    Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street, 
NW; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes the U.S. East Coast from the 
geographic scope and deletes Hapag-Lloyd's GCS service from the 
agreement.

    Agreement No.: 012233-002.
    Title: CSCL/UASC/YMUK/CMA CGM/PIL Vessel Sharing and Slot Exchange 
Agreement--Asia and US/Canada West Coast Services.
    Parties: China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd. and China 
Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. (acting as a single 
party); United Arab Shipping Company (S.A.G.); Yang Ming (UK) LTD.; CMA 
CGM S.A.; and Pacific International Lines (Pte) Ltd.
    Filing Party: Patricia M. O'Neill; Blank & Rome LLP; 600 New 
Hampshire Ave NW., Washington DC, 20037.
    Synopsis: The amendment adds two additional slot exchange 
arrangements in the agreement trade between China Shipping and Yang 
Ming, and between CMA and Yang Ming.

    Agreement No.: 012314.
    Title: COSCON/CSCL Slot Charter Agreement.
    Parties: COSCO Container Lines Company, Limited; China Shipping 
Container Lines Co., Ltd and China Shipping Container Lines (Hong Kong) 
Co., Ltd. (acting as a single party).
    Filing Party: Eric. C. Jeffrey, Esq.; Nixon Peabody LLP; 401 9th 
Street NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20004.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes China Shipping to charter space 
to COSCON in the trade from France, Italy, Morocco, and Spain, on the 
one hand, to the U.S. East Coast, on the other hand.


[[Page 3236]]


    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-01033 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2247

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Eddie Johnson, also known as *

Eddie Muldrew, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Eddie Mudrew, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 7, 2004

Filed: January 15, 2004

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent

to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), and 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska.

-2-

The district court1

 sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised

release. On appeal Johnson’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is too long.

We reject this argument, because the sentence is within both the statutory range

and the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, and Johnson agreed in a written plea

agreement that his prison term would be at least 121 months. See 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(A)(iii) (penalty of 10 years to life imprisonment); United States v.

Smotherman, 326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (district court’s exercise of

discretion in setting defendant’s sentence within properly determined Guidelines

range is nonreviewable), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 293 (2003); United States v. Nguyen,

46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who voluntarily subjects himself to

specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal).

Upon careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly we affirm, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1482 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1482

   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or replace 
certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at 
             Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2017

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or replace 
certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at 
             Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES AT 
              SMITH GULCH.

    The authorization of the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or 
replace facilities or structures for commercial recreation services at 
Smith Gulch under section 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(24)(D))--
            (1) may include improvements or replacements that the 
        Secretary of Agriculture determines--
                    (A) are consistent with section 9(b) of the Central 
                Idaho Wilderness Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C. 1281 note; 
                Public Law 96-312); and
                    (B) would reduce the impact of the commercial 
                recreation facilities or services on wilderness or wild 
                and scenic river resources and values; and
            (2) authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to consider 
        including, as appropriate--
                    (A) hydroelectric generators and associated 
                electrical transmission facilities;
                    (B) water pumps for fire suppression;
                    (C) transitions from propane to electrical 
                lighting;
                    (D) solar energy systems;
                    (E) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for power 
                storage; and
                    (F) other improvements or replacements which are 
                consistent with this section that the Secretary of 
                Agriculture determines appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
M A N D A T E

TO THE 197TH DISTRICT COURT of WILLACY COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 25th day of

November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Juan Garza, Appellant,

v.

Geronimo Galvan, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00298-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-CV-0488-A)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 19th day of February, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK

FILE COPY
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Stantec Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I,
Robert J. Gomes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        |  |  |  |                                     |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 20, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert J. Gomes                 |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | ROBERT J. GOMES, P. ENG             |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer |  |
#### In the Matter of Murray Landsman, a Disbarred Attorney.

[632 NYS2d 461]

Application for reinstatement granted only insofar as to refer this matter for a hearing as indicated. No opinion. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
No. 91-397.

#### Citizens Against Burlington, Inc., et al. *v.*Busey, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4120]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee for 2011.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact: Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-
3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4120 Filed 2-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
```
No. 91-6235.

#### Yovev *v.*Northrop Corp.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6059

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMETRIUS DARRELL WHITEHEAD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00213-F-1; 5:14-cv-00349-F)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Darrell Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Denise Walker, Seth 

Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Darrell Whitehead seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Whitehead has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
---

---

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

|/x/ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001

or

|/ / | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission File Number: 0-27118

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | 33-0557266(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------

CN 5350, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5350(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(609) 452-3600(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes /x/  No / /

Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

|ClassCommon Stock, $.0001 par value | Outstanding at August 2, 200123,832,083
|----------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------

---

Explanatory Note

This Form 10-Q/A amends the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2001 to correct the number of shares outstanding at
August 2, 2001 listed on the cover page.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.

| |  | PHARMACOPEIA, INC.
| |  | ------------------
| |  | By:               

Date:
August 20, 2001

---

QuickLinks
# C_2011219EN.01001602.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/16

---

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Nuova Agricast v Commission

(Case T-373/08) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Aid scheme under Italian legislation - Scheme declared compatible with the common market - Transitional measure - Exclusion of certain undertakings - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Absence - Clear lack of jurisdiction - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2011/C 219/23

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nuova Agricast Srl (Cerignola, Italy) (represented by: M.A. Calabrese, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for non-contractual liability seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s adopting the decision of 12 July 2000 not to raise objections to a State aid scheme in the form of aid for investment in disadvantaged regions of Italy (Aid No 715/99 — Italy (SG 2000 D/105754) and by reason of the Commission’s conduct prior to the adoption of that decision.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Nuova Agricast Srl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Nuova Agricast Srl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27933]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 474 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-465, K2025-462.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27933 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM ZEPEDA,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-71452

Tax Ct. No. 9552-11

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

William Zepeda appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order and decision

granting the Commissioner’s motion for entry of decision regarding a federal tax

lien. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. 

Charlotte’s Office Boutique, Inc. v. Comm’r, 425 F.3d 1203, 1211 (9th Cir. 2005). 

FILED

NOV 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We affirm.

The Tax Court properly granted the Commissioner’s motion for entry of

decision, sustaining in part a federal tax lien regarding tax liability for the years

2005 and 2006, because Zepeda failed to raise the underlying tax liability in a

collection due process (“CDP”) hearing. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6330-1(f)(2) Q &

A F3 (when a taxpayer disagrees with a notice of determination, the taxpayer may

ask the Tax Court to consider the issues that were properly raised in the CDP

hearing); Giamelli v. Comm’r, 129 T.C. 107, 115 (2007) (Tax Court does not have

authority to consider challenges to underlying tax liability that were not properly

raised before the appeals office). 

We reject Zepeda’s contentions that the Tax Court erred by sustaining the

notice of determination or improperly denied him a trial.

The Commissioner’s motion for an exemption, filed October 19, 2015, is

granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-71452
No. 82-850.

#### Gordon *v.*Terry et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.