alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/28/201 0 10:1 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A ^ OM S 0001/00 3

^ U.S

. Deportrnen t o t Tronsporlotio n Federa l Aviaiio n Administratio n Southwes t Regio n Arkansas , Louisiana , Ne w Mexico , Oklahom a Texa s Ma y 20 , 201 0 Vi aCertifie dMail
. Return Receip t Requeste d Hearin g Docke t Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 800 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0 Washingto n D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 a Re
. I n f

h e Matte r o f LM l Painting , L

J C FA A Cas e No
. 2009SW70020 8 rAA-2010-001 7 • •.i-iw'-.xj' A Oftic e o f Regiona l Counse l 260 1 Meacha m Boulevar d fo n Worth , T

X 78137-429 8 (61)7 ) 222-509 9 (817 ) 222-5945/609 2 FA X


# tmS\Anoi)z^/<soiO-(jv/' ]

Oi l Februar y 16 , 2010 , LMI Painting , LLC (LMl ) withdrew it s reques t fo r ahearin g in th e above

captjonc dmaner . However , when w e reviewe dDocke t FAA-2010-0017 , thai reques t wa s no t in the docket folder
. Accordingly , w e ar e forwardin g LMI' s reques t an done copy t

o th e Docke t

an dt o th e Administrativ e Judge , wh o i s no l yet assigned
. Sincerely , LYNETT K WOR D Regiona l Counse l SouthweKORegio

n

EiKlb&ijJ.e; JwM

J Painting , LJ.- C withdra-wa l of It s reques t

fo r ahearin g - origina l an don e cop y

cc ; Lanc e Murphy , President/Owne r LMI Paintiiig , LL C 523 8 Briltmoor

e Roa d Houston , TX 7704 105/28/201 0 10:1 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S 12002/00 3 

# LTv n

PftltJTINC.WAnCOvtaiNlj.lHLCIa l ro/sflNlj'

. L.ivi.t

. :i2-j 8 BriUiiioovf

t l'i.(')a d Hoii.^Loii , TPXM S 7704 1 Phone : {-jy} ) H5(i.87r\ 7 F<ix;(7i;j)tf56.eiaf >

Hearin g Docke t Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbur Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W ] 00 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0

LM I Paintin g i s requestin g l o withdraw our reques t for ahearing
. LM l i s sendin g acop y thi s lette r bot h t o th e FAA attorne y wh o signe dth e Notic e an dto th e Hearin g Docket
.

Addres55 : '^'^-^' ^ '^n^-mDort

- Ro< M Telephone : 11 1 -'^^1 , -'^'l^ n Date ; ^ - I0

> ~ 1 0 Cas e No : JOO^ l SWIQO^D^ ' Ta x I D Number : 7 6 CSO O ^^ H
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel P. Donovan, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                          |  |                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. 
|               |  |  |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | By:                      |  | KESTREL HEAT LLC (General Partner)   
|               |  |  | 
|August 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                      |  | /s/ DANIEL P. DONOVAN                
|               |  |  |  |                          |  | Daniel P. Donovan                    
|               |  |  |  |                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|               |  |  |  |                          |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.              
|               |  |  |  |                          |  | Star Gas Finance Company
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.














In connection with the ANNUAL Report of AMERICHIP INTERNATIONAL, INC..(the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Marc Walther, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 12, 2007





/s/
      Marc Walther


Marc
      Walther,


Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ami Trauber, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|               |  |  |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | 
|              
|               |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | 
|April 30, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |
No. 82-863.

#### Hastings, United States District Judge *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0905. CORNELIUS TODD v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N. A. AS TRUSTEE

FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST.

This dispossessory proceeding originated in magistrate court, and the parties

consented to the transfer of the case to superior court. On September 11, 2020, the

superior court entered its “Order Regarding Eviction,” but noted that evictions were

temporarily halted by an order of the Centers for Disease Control. Defendant

Cornelius Todd, represented by attorney GradyRoberts,

1

filed a notice of appealfrom

the superior court’s order. Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust filed a motion to dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

As a general rule, a right of direct appeal lies from a final judgment; that is,

where the case is no longer pending below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Here, the

“Order Regarding Eviction” did not resolve the action, which remains pending in the

superior court.

2 Accordingly, Todd was required to comply with the interlocutory

appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) in order to obtain appellate review. See

Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assoc., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828)

(1994). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly,

U.S. Bank Trust’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is

1 On February 15, 2017, this Court issued an order revoking attorney Grady

Alexander Roberts’s permission to practice law before the Court of Appeals.

2 U.S. Bank Trust filed its application for a writ of possession on January 21,

2021, but the record on appeal contains no indication that trial court has ruled on the

application.

February 26, 2021
DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/26/2021
Exhibit 32.1



PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey A. Hawthorne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard Okumoto, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.



Dated: May 14, 2004



|                                                           |  |  |  |                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                                                           |  | 
|/s/ JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                                   |  |  |  | /s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO                                  
|                                                           |  |  |  |                                                      
|Jeffrey A. Hawthorne President and Chief
Executive Officer |  |  |  | Richard Okumoto Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-50913

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Vincent Lamar Barnett, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-566-1

Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Vincent Lamar Barnett, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Barnett has filed a response. To the extent that Barnett 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-50913 Document: 00515849395 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
No. 19-50913

2

argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the record is not 

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of these claims; 

we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral 

review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Barnett’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-50913 Document: 00515849395 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
EXHIBIT 14.1

                          AmeriChip International Inc.

                            CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT

Integrity and ethics play a significant role in the way we conduct business at
AmeriChip International Inc. (the "Company"). Operating with a strong sense of
integrity is critical to maintaining trust and credibility with our clients,
employees, and investors.

Our code embodies rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well
as responsibilities to our clients, employees, shareholders and the public. This
Code includes:

      o     Prohibiting conflicts of interest

      o     Protecting the Company's confidential and proprietary information
            and that of our clients and other business partners

      o     Treating the Company's employees, clients and competitors fairly

      o     Protection and proper use of Company assets

      o     Compliance with laws, rules and regulations (including insider
            trading laws)

      o     Encouraging the reporting of any unlawful or unethical behavior

Overview of Business Ethics

The collection of policies and guidelines established in the Code of Business
Conduct applies to all Company employees (including those of our subsidiaries)
and members of our Board of Directors. We believe that long-term, trusting
business relationships are built by being honest, open and fair. We promise to
uphold the highest professional standards in all business operations. We also
expect that those with whom we do business will adhere to the standards set by
our Code of Business Conduct.

Outstanding employees are key to our success. Everyone is part of the Company
team, and each of us deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. In
addition, every employee is responsible for his/her own conduct. No one has the
authority to make another employee violate our Code of Business Conduct, and any
attempt to direct or otherwise influence someone else to commit a violation is
unacceptable.

We require all those covered by this Code of Business Conduct to know and
understand its terms. This Code states general principles and does not supersede
the specific policies and procedures set forth in the Company's Administrative
Policies and Procedures handbook or in separate specific policy statements,
including those concerning trading in the Company's stock.

The fundamental principle that underlies the way we do business is sound
judgment. An understanding of our legal and ethical parameters enhances that
judgment. We have a responsibility to pay constant attention to all legal
boundaries and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations in all of our
operations. For everyone at the Company, this means following the spirit of the
law and doing the right, ethical thing even when the law is not specific.

Although we realize that no two situations are alike, we aim for consistency and
balance when encountering ethical issues. It is essential that we all remain
watchful for possible infringements of our business ethics. Employees who have
questions regarding business conduct or possible violations should contact their
manager or the Company's legal counsel.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

TROPICAL AVIATION GROUND 

SERVICES, INC. and AIR SUNSHINE, 

INC. 

Complainant, 

v. 

BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 

Respondent. 

Docket No.16-12-15 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules of 

Practice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to 

on or before October 14, 2014. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

JUl 22 2014 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July J:2- , 2014, I placed in the United States mail (first class, 

postage paid), a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Ronnie Adili, Esq., P.A. 

5645 Coral Ridge Drive, #292 

Coral Springs, FL 33076 

Robert A. Sweetapple 

Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkas, P.L. 

165 East Boca Raton Road 

Boca Raton, FL 33432 

Counsel for Complainants 

Joni Armstrong Coffey 

Broward County Attorney 

Government Center, Suite 423 

115 South Andrews A venue 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

Counsel for Respondent 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

Southern Region Airports Division, AS0-600 

Orlando Airports District Office 

~~ Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) as adopted pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Lorrie T. Olivier, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29,
2008



/s/ Lorrie T. OlivierLorrie T. Olivier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6873
TRUMAN SCOTT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TRACY JOHN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02182-H) Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Truman Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Truman Scott, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. John , No. 5:07-hc-02182-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | /s/MARSHA H. FANUCCIMarsha H. Fanucci
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer)
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
                        Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                   Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
<CAPTION>
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED                 NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                              SEPTEMBER 30,                     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                          1996             1995             1996            1995
                                      --------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>              <C>              <C>              <C> 
Average common stock outstanding       23,837,703        3,161,814       21,749,426        3,161,814
Assumed conversion of Convertible
  Preferred Stock                              --       12,109,721               --       12,109,721
Common stock equivalents                       --        3,879,160               --        3,879,160
                                      --------------------------------------------------------------
     Total                             23,837,703       19,150,695       21,749,426       19,150,695
                                      ============================================================== 

Net loss                              $  (724,241)     $(2,396,354)     $(4,995,894)     $(7,522,299)
                                      ==============================================================

Net loss per share                    $     (0.03)     $     (0.13)     $     (0.23)     $     (0.39)
                                      ==============================================================

</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.