OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 1 of 4

COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT – 140

March 30, 1990

Jean Backs

Division of Reclamation

Ohio Department of Natural Resources

4383 Fountain Square Court

Building B-3

Columbus, Ohio 43224

TOPIC: STATE SURFACE COAL MINE REGULATIONS PRE-SMCRA

INQUIRY: Which states had statutes and rules in force to regulate surface coal mining prior to 

the passage of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977? Please locate any 

information available on pre-SMCRA laws and regulations. 

SEARCH RESULTS: Using the COALEX Library, a 1977 Committee Print was identified 

which contains the results of a survey conducted by the Congressional Research Service of the 

Library of Congress. The survey compared the proposed federal legislation with existing state 

laws and regulations. A brief description of the survey and its findings is provided below. A copy 

of the Committee Print is attached. 

"State Surface Mining Laws: A Survey, A Comparison with the Proposed Federal Legislation, 

and Background Information", Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Publication 

No 95-25, 95th Cong, 1st Sess (June 1977).

BACKGROUND

In November, 1976, a questionnaire was sent out by the Senate Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources (formerly the Interior and Insular Affairs Committee) to 39 states that had 

surface mining laws for coal or other minerals. The purpose of survey was to: "gather 

information concerning State laws and regulations governing surface effects of coal mining, 

together with information regarding enforcement of those laws, as compared with the 

requirements of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1976 (H.R. 13950 - 94th 

Congress)." [NOTE: HR 13950 was replaced by HR 2.] Committee Print, p. 29.

Copies of proposed sections 515 and 516 were enclosed with the questionnaire.

The results of the survey, reported as the Committee Print, were "designed to assist the 

Committee in determining whether or not Federal legislation to regulate surface mining [was] 

necessary and, if it [was], what that legislation might contain." Committee Print, p. 4.

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 2 of 4

The amount of detail provided in responses to the questionnaire differed widely; however, the 

results "suggest[ed]" that "most requirements of the State laws [were] far less stringent than the 

proposed Federal regulations in H.R. 13950 would be" and enforcement was "extremely lenient 

or even non-existent".

Some of the findings are as follows:

1. Permitting. 

Virtually all of the states which have surface mining laws required that mine operators 

first obtain permits before engaging in active mining. Procedures for obtaining permits in 

H.R. 13850 were more detailed than those of the states, with the exception of Ohio. Ohio 

mining law was similar to the federal. 

2. Abandoned Lands Reclamation.

Only a few states had "implemented any programs of reclaiming land which was mined 

prior to the passage of the State mining laws." Kentucky and Virginia had appropriated or 

procured money for reclamation. Some of the other states had "initiated programs to 

reclaim abandoned lands by using the proceeds from fines for noncompliance or from 

permit application fees." 

3. Mine Inspectors.

In general, there was "an inadequate number of mine inspectors for the number of mining 

operations under permit in the state" and the mine inspectors were inadequately trained. 

4. Citizens Complaints.

"Many State mining laws [did] not have adequate mechanisms for the filing, 

consideration, and disposition of citizen complaints related to coal surface mining." 

5. Enforcement.

"[E]ven when violations [were] discovered in a State, fines assessed against the operators 

were small in size and in number. Kentucky, Montana, Ohio, and Virginia were among 

the few States which [had] actually assessed fines against mine operators for noncompliance with the law." 

6. Bonding.

"[T]he most serious shortcoming of the state surface-mining laws seems to be that of not 

requiring an adequate amount of performance bond to insure reclamation in the event of 

forfeiture by the operator." 

Committee Print, pp. 25-28.

RESULTS OF THE SURVEY

According to the survey, the following states had laws in existence in 1977 to regulate surface 

mining of coal: 

• Alaska: had only one operation at the time of the survey. 

• California: operations were regulated on the county or local level. 

• Georgia 

• Idaho 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 3 of 4

• Illinois 

• Indiana 

• Iowa 

• Kansas 

• Kentucky 

• Michigan 

• Missouri 

• Montana 

• Ohio 

• Pennsylvania

• South Dakota 

• Tennessee 

• Texas 

• Virginia 

• Washington: had two active mine operations 

• West Virginia 

The following states had laws regulating underground mining but not surface mining of coal:

• North Carolina: last mining was conducted in 1950's. 

These states had laws regulating other minerals, ores, etc. but not coal:

• Hawaii: laws were enacted to mine bauxite. 

• Maine: enacted regulations for non-coal mining and reclamation. 

• Minnesota: had laws re mining and reclamation of metallic ores. 

• New Jersey: rules for stone quarries and sand pits, only. 

• New York: laws for mining minerals other than coal. 

• North Carolina: laws regulating non-metallic minerals. 

• Rhode Island: sand and gravel operations were regulated on the local level, only. 

• South Carolina 

• Vermont: had some laws pertaining to mineral development. 

• Wisconsin: laws for metallic mining.

These states reported that they had no surface mining statutes:

• Arizona 

• Connecticut 

• Delaware 

• Florida 

• Massachusetts 

• Mississippi 

• Nebraska 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 4 of 4

Specific comparisons between the state regulations and the proposed federal statute are discussed 

in the Print. A table version of the findings is also a part of the Print. The table, entitled "matrix", 

is included as part of the attachment; however, it was reproduced from the computer database 

and is difficult to read.

ATTACHMENTS

A. "State Surface Mining Laws: A Survey, A Comparison with the Proposed Federal 

Legislation, and Background Information", Senate Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources, Publication No 95-25, 95th Cong, 1st Sess (June 1977).