alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Andersen’s B-52 Assists in Search and Rescue

By Staff Sgt. Divine Cox36th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements No. 333-74616 and No. 333-146214 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 12, 2008 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Sierra Bancorp and Subsidiary and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
|                                   
|Rancho Cucamonga, California       
|March 12, 2008
```

EXHIBIT 99.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Howard Cooper,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Teton Petroleum  Company (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
     31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2003

                                          /s/ Howard Cooper
                                          -----------------
                                          Name: Howard Cooper
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1403 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1403

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities in 
                              Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

    Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico (for herself, Mr. Curbelo of 
    Florida, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, and Mr. Serrano) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities in 
                              Puerto Rico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRODUCTION 
              ACTIVITIES IN PUERTO RICO MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 199(d)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking subparagraph (C).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S389]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
        Whitehouse, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
        Feingold, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. 
        Cantwell, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
        Udall, of New Mexico, Mr. Udall, of Colorado, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
        Lautenberg, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Menendez):
  S. 231. A bill to designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife 
Refuge as wilderness; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
  Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, this morning we introduced legislation 
to protect the coastal plains region of the Arctic National Wildlife 
Refuge from the threat of oil and gas exploration. S. 231 designates 
1.5 million acres of the Refuge as Wilderness to be included in the 
National Wilderness Preservation System. Bestowing Wilderness 
designation on this precious piece of national heritage will reaffirm 
the original intent of the Refuge: to provide habitat for Alaska's 
wildlife.
  As designated Wilderness, that land will become subject to specific 
management restrictions. Human activities will be restricted to non-
motorized recreation, scientific research, and other non-invasive 
activities. Logging, mining, road building, mechanized vehicles, and 
other forms of development are generally prohibited in designated 
Wilderness areas. However, since these particular lands are in Alaska, 
some public motorized uses will be permitted for subsistence and 
traditional use. For example, subsistence hunting as well as limited 
backpacking and hiking will be allowed.
  The Arctic Refuge is home to 250 species of wildlife. Drilling there 
would severely harm its abundant populations of polar bears, caribou, 
musk oxen, and snow geese, and the amount of commercially recoverable 
oil in the Refuge would satisfy only a very small percentage of our 
nation's need at any given time.
  The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a pristine natural treasure 
that must be preserved for future generations. We do not have to choose 
between conservation and exploration when it comes to our energy 
future; we can do both simultaneously while moving toward a sustainable 
and diverse national energy policy.
  I look forward to working with my colleagues to pass this important 
legislation.
                                 ______
```
June 13, 1952

Hon. Hartman Hooser County Attorney Howard County Big Spring, Texas

Dear Sir: OpinionNo. V-1459 Re: Legality of designation by two or more counties of the same person as commissionerto sell a tract of land inwhich each county owns an interest. Your request for an opinion of this office reads in part as follows:

9/hen two or more counties own an interest In a tract of land,may each county appoint the same commissionerto sell the respective interests of both? "TheCo,unties

of Howard, Martin, Midland and Ector each own an interest in thirty-fiveacres of land situated In Howard Co,unty,

which landwas purchased in 1925 for the purpose of obtaininggravel for road construction. The counties are now desiro,us

of selling this land and all want to appoint one man as the commlssioner to sell said land at public a,uction.' Section 1 of Article 1577,V.C.S., provides: "TheCommlssionersCourt may, by an order to be entered on itsminutes, appoint a commissionerto sell and dispose of any real estate of the county at public auction. The deed of such commissioner,made in conformity to such order for and in behalf of the county, duly acknowledgedand proven and recorded shall be sufficient to convey to the purchasersall the right, title, and interest and estatewhich the countymay have In and to the premises to be conveyed. Nothing contained in this article shall a,uthorlze any CommissionersCourt to dispose of any landsHan, Hartman Hooser, page 2 (V-1459)

given, donated or granted to such county for the purpose of education In anx othermanner than shall be directedby law, There is nothing in the above statute or any other law which prohibitsprocedure outlined in your request. The statute does not place any restriction on the commissioners'court in the appointment of a commissionerfor the purpose of selling real estate owned by the county. While it iswell settled that counties have only such powers as are either expressly or by necessary implicationgiven them by law, yet, once authority is vested in them, a reasonable construction of that authoritywill be given to effect its purpose, Commissioners'Court of Madison County v. Wallace, 118Tex. 27

9 commissioners'co,urts'are given broad discretion In making the appointment of a commissionerto sell real estatewith no restrictionas to whom they may appoint, we agreewith you thatwhen two or more counties own an interest in a tract of land the commissioners'co~urt of each countymay appoint the same commissioner to sell the respective interests of all. SUMMARY When two or more co,untles own an interest in a tract of land, the commissioners'court of each co,unty

may appoint the same commissioner to sell the respective interests of all. Art. 1577,V.C.S. Yours very truly, APPROVED: J. C. Davis, Jr, County AffairsDivision Mary K. Wall Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant PRICEDANIEL Attorney General

By B %en 4 &&4-* Assistant

BA:mh
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY

By: KESTREL HEAT, LLC (General Partner)



|            |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                         
|----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|            |  |  | 
|May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOSEPH P.
CAVANAUGH
|            |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Joseph P. Cavanaugh     
|            |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|            |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P. 
|            |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Star Gas Finance Company
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Dated:  May 9, 2007 | /s/ DEBORAH DUNSIRE                   |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Deborah Dunsire                       |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal executive officer)         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and willbe retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
June 13, 1952 

Hon. Hartman Hooser 

County Attorney 

Howard County 

Big Spring, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. V-1459 

Re: Legality of designation 

by two or more counties 

of the same person as 

commissioner to sell a 

tract of land in which 

each county owns an 

interest. 

Your request for an opinion of this office 

reads in part as follows: 

9/hen two or more counties own an 

interest In a tract of land, may each 

county appoint the same commissioner to 

sell the respective interests of both? 

"The Co,unties of Howard, Martin, 

Midland and Ector each own an interest in 

thirty-five acres of land situated In Howard Co,unty, which land was purchased in 

1925 for the purpose of obtaining gravel 

for road construction. The counties are 

now desiro,us of selling this land and all 

want to appoint one man as the commlssioner to sell said land at public a,uction.' 

Section 1 of Article 1577, V.C.S., provides: 

"The Commlssioners Court may, by an 

order to be entered on its minutes, appoint 

a commissioner to sell and dispose of any 

real estate of the county at public auction. 

The deed of such commissioner, made in conformity to such order for and in behalf of 

the county, duly acknowledged and proven and 

recorded shall be sufficient to convey to the 

purchasers all the right, title, and interest 

and estate which the county may have In and 

to the premises to be conveyed. Nothing contained in this article shall a,uthorlze any 

Commissioners Court to dispose of any lands 
Han, Hartman Hooser, page 2 (V-1459) 

given, donated or granted to such county for 

the purpose of education In anx other manner 

than shall be directed by law, 

There is nothing in the above statute or 

any other law which prohibits procedure outlined in 

your request. The statute does not place any restriction on the commissioners' court in the appointment 

of a commissioner for the purpose of selling real 

estate owned by the county. While it is well settled 

that counties have only such powers as are either expressly or by necessary implication given them by law, 

yet, once authority is vested in them, a reasonable 

construction of that authority will be given to effect 

its purpose, Commissioners' Court of Madison County v. 

Wallace, 118 Tex. 9 27 

commissioners' co,urts'are given broad discretion In 

making the appointment of a commissioner to sell real 

estate with no restriction as to whom they may appoint, 

we agree with you that when two or more counties own 

an interest in a tract of land the commissioners' co~urt 

of each county may appoint the same commissioner to 

sell the respective interests of all. 

SUMMARY 

When two or more co,untles own an interest 

in a tract of land, the commissioners' court of 

each co,unty may appoint the same commissioner 

to sell the respective interests of all. Art. 

1577, V.C.S. 

Yours very truly, 

APPROVED: 

J. C. Davis, Jr, 

County Affairs Division 

Mary K. Wall 

Reviewing Assistant 

Charles D. Mathews 

First Assistant 

PRICE DANIEL 

Attorney General 

By 4 B %en 

&&4-* 

Assistant 

BA:mh
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 210/24/2014 17:42:03

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Limerick 2 Docket (050- 00353)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

313

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR141 - Problem not properly classified or prioritized M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

141 - Problem not properly classified or prioritized H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering S - Surveillance 147 - Individual corrective action LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering G - Design 

1042

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA E - Electrical T - Testing 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical G - Design 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 2 of 210/24/2014 17:42:03

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Limerick 2 Docket (050- 00353)

Work Planning & Practices / IR189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA O - Control Room Ops 

O - Operations

1042

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 24
## NUMBER 13

- 2 3

- 00193

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

REINALDO E. AREVALO RAMOS

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 13

of Bexar County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

This cause is before the court on a ppellant ’s motion to dismiss th is appeal which

indicates appellant wishes to withdraw his appeal

. 1 O n August 17, 2023, this matter was

abated due to appellant ’s failure to file a brief and remanded to the trial court to determine

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket

equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001.2

whether the appeal had been abandoned

.

On October 3, 2023, c ounsel for a ppellant filed a signed letter indicating appellant

wishes to withdraw the appeal which we construe as a motion to dismiss. A ppellant signed

an attached affidavit confirming that it is his wish to withdraw the appeal and continue

probation

. We find the motion and affidavit together meet the requirement of Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). Accordingly, we reinstate the matter ;

wit hout passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the

appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

JAIME TIJERIN A

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the

26th day of October , 202 3

.
combustionsurvey - Fw: Additional Information and Data Related to CO Emissions - Biomass 

Stoker/Sloped Grate/Other Subcategory 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:37PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Pinkerton, John" <JPinkerton@NCASI.org> 

Date: 07/15/2011 04:36PM 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Hunt, Tim" <Tim_Hunt@afandpa.org>, "Jain, Ashok" 

<ajain@NCASI.org>, "Someshwar, Arun (SRC)" <ArunSomeshwar@NCASI.org> 

Subject: Additional Information and Data Related to CO Emissions - Biomass Stoker/Sloped 

Grate/Other Subcategory 

(See attached file: Shrager-July15.pdf) 

(See attached file: CO-Stoker Biomass 3-hr NCASI paper 7-15-11.pdf) 

(See attached file: CO-Stoker Biomass Alternative Limits- NCASI paper 7-15-11.pdf)

Brian,

Please see attached letter and associated documents. Should these also be submitted to the Boiler MACT 

docket or will EPA add them at some point?

Sincerely,

John Pinkerton 

John Pinkerton

NCASI

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.

P.O. Box 13318

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3318

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:38 PM

Subject:

 

Fw: Additional Information and Data Related to CO Emissions - Biomass Stoker/Sloped 

Grate/Other Subcategory

Attachments:

 

Shrager-July15.pdf; CO-Stoker Biomass 3-hr NCASI paper 7-15-11.pdf; CO-Stoker 

Biomass Alternative Limits- NCASI paper 7-15-11.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B05EDO... 8/2/2011
Telephone: 919-941-6406

Fax: 919-941-6401

Deliveries: 3106 East NC Highway 54, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Contact publications@ncasi.org if you do not want to receive future NCASI communications

 

= 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B05EDO... 8/2/2011