alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 172

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CR-14-683

ALBERT W. LIDDELL

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered March 11, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-2011-1018]

HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR.,

JUDGE

MOTION DENIED; 

REBRIEFING ORDERED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

In July 2011, Albert W. Liddell pleaded guilty to theft of property and was sentenced

to eight years’ probation. In March 2014, the State filed a petition to revoke probation based

upon allegations that Liddell had violated written conditions of the probation. A revocation

hearing was held in the circuit court on April 30, 2014. The circuit court, upon finding that

Liddell had inexcusably violated several conditions, revoked probation and sentenced him to

thirty-six months’ imprisonment and thirty-six months’ suspended imposition of sentence. 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-

3(k)(1), Liddell’s counsel has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw asserting that

there are no nonfrivolous arguments that would support an appeal. Liddell was notified of

his right to file a list of pro se points for reversal, but he has not done so. 

We order rebriefing because counsel’s brief does not comply with our rule’s

requirements. A request to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 172

shall be accompanied by a brief with an argument section containing “a list of all rulings

adverse to the defendant . . . on all objections, motions and requests made by either party with

an explanation as to why each ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal.” Ark. Sup. Ct.

R. 4-3(k)(1) (2014). The brief’s abstract shall contain “material parts” of the transcripts,

including information “essential for the appellate court to . . . decide the issues on appeal.” 

Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(5) (2014). In appeals from criminal convictions, a no-merit brief that

omits even a single adverse ruling requires rebriefing. Sartin v. State, 2010 Ark. 16, 362

S.W.3d 877.

 The only adverse rulings listed in counsel’s brief are an evidentiary ruling and the

circuit court’s decision to revoke probation. Our review of the record reveals at least one

additional adverse ruling, which occurred when the circuit court pronounced sentence at the

conclusion of the hearing. This was in contravention of Liddell’s request that probation be

left intact or that sentencing be deferred to a later date. We also note a factual error in

counsel’s brief: the statement of the case indicates that the State filed its petition to revoke a

year before Liddell was put on probation. 

We order counsel to file a substituted brief, abstract, and addendum within fifteen days

from the date of this opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2014). We encourage counsel,

before rebriefing, to review our rules and the record to ensure that no additional deficiencies

are present. 

Motion denied; rebriefing ordered. 

VIRDEN and GLOVER, JJ., agree. 

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

No response.

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                      |  |                                                                                           
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE
COMPANY  By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |  |  | 
|March 15, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | By:                                                                                  |  | /s/    RICHARD F.
AMBURY                                                                  
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                      |  | Richard F. Ambury Chief Financial Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, P. Thomas Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Open Text Corporation and will be retained by Open Text Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    P. THOMAS JENKINSP. Thomas JenkinsChief Executive Officer




Dated: May 14,
2003
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Chairman Jackson to Tour Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant, Conduct Press  Conference at Facility on Tuesday, August 18

----

----

I-98-94

August 13, 1998

**NRC CHAIRMAN JACKSON TO TOUR THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR PLANT,CONDUCT PRESS CONFERENCE AT FACILITY ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 18**

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will hold a press conference at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant on Tuesday, August 18, in conjunction with her tour of the Middletown, Pa., facility that day.

The press conference is scheduled to begin at 2:45 p.m. in the auditorium at the plant's training center, which is located on Route 441, behind the visitors center. It will last approximately a half-hour. Questions will be restricted to members of the working press.

Dr. Jackson is traveling to TMI for a routine information-gathering visit.

EDITOR'S NOTE: A file biography of Dr. Jackson is available upon request.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alfred Mancuso, Appellant, v Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 1022]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Dadd, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
V 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1527 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and 

Vania Simeonova. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2017 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SIMEON 

4 SIMEONOV, STELA SIMEONOVA, STOYAN 

5 SIMEONOV, AND VANIA SIMEONOVA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

9 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall each be eligible for 

10 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1527 IH

1 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi2 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi3 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

4 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Simeon Simeonov, 

6 Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, or Vania Simeonova 

7 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci8 fied in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 

9 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi10 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

21 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova, the Secretary of State 

22 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the 

23 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

24 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

25 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1527 IH

1 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

2 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

3 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

4 202(e) of such Act. 

5 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

6 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

7 parents, brothers, and sisters of Simeon Simeonov, Stela 

8 Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall 

9 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

10 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

11 Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN CHRISTOPHER BUZZELL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2570

[ August 20, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey J. Colbath , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2018

- CF

011460

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , M AY and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 13.2


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Prana Biotechnology Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathryn Andrews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kathryn Andrews*
Kathryn Andrews

Chief Financial Officer




August 26, 2015





* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 203/16/2015 17:36:20

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palo Verde 1 Docket (050- 00528)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content G - Engineering G - Design 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

212

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering G - Design 

318

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 183 - Pre-job activities LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

1059

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 2 of 203/16/2015 17:36:20

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Palo Verde 1 Docket (050- 00528)

Problem Identification & Resolution / LER142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 17
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1124 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1124

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of 
 the Federal Reserve System from providing bailouts or other financial 
   assistance to a pension plan of a State or political subdivision 
                    thereof, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

  Mr. Babin (for himself and Mr. McClintock) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for 
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of 
 the Federal Reserve System from providing bailouts or other financial 
   assistance to a pension plan of a State or political subdivision 
                    thereof, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Pensions 
Accountability and Security Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON BAILOUTS FOR STATE AND LOCAL PENSION FUNDS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the 
Federal Reserve System may not provide any loan, grant, or other form 
of financial assistance--
            (1) to a pension plan (as defined under section 3 of the 
        Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 
        1002)) established or maintained by the government of any State 
        or political subdivision thereof, or by any agency or 
        instrumentality of such a State or political subdivision; or
            (2) to the government of any State or political subdivision 
        thereof, or by any agency or instrumentality of such a State or 
        political subdivision, unless such government, agency, or 
        instrumentality certifies that the financial assistance will 
        not be used, directly or indirectly, to fund such a pension 
        plan.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 754 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-443, K2025-440.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27899 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 2011

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 1362

Harold M. Hoffman,

i ndividually and on behalf of those similarly situated,

Appellant

v.

Nordic Naturals, Inc.

( D.N.J . No. 2

- 14

- cv

- 03291 )

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, t he opinion filed on September 14, 2016, is amended to

correct footnote 41. The footnote should read:

We recently discussed this issue in Chavez v. Dole Food Co., Inc.

, --- F.3d

--- , 2016 WL 4578641 , at *18 n.130 (3d Cir. Sept. 2, 2016) (en banc).

For the Court,

s/ Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: September 15, 2016

CLW/cc: Harold M. Hoffman, Esq.

Michael R. McDonald, Esq.

Jennifer M. Thibodaux, Esq.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 531 4

_____________________________
J AMES G ILLISPIE , Appellant,

v.

J O HN C OLE B AKKER , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Jack R. Heflin , Judge

. October 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and W OLF and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Glenn M. Swiatek, Shalimar
, for Appellant.2 Jo hn Cole Bakker , pro se , for Appellee.