alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Serne, Jim (Raleigh,NC-US)" <JSerne@trcsolutions.com>

To: Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/21/2010 10:28 AM

Subject: Secondary Aluminum Tests

Peter,

The target compound list for Secondary Aluminum includes 1,2-Dichloropropane and 1,3-Dichloropropene on the 

VOST list, but the lab reported 1,2-Dichloropropane and 1,3-Dichloropropane.

The lab normally looks for 1,3-Dichloropropane, not 1,3-Dichloropropene.

Does EPA want emissions data for 1,3-Dichloropropene or was that possibly a typo on the EPA target list??

The lab didn’t calibrate for 1,3-Dichloropropene, but they said that they can go back and report it as a TIC.

The results for 1,3-Dichloropropane were all Non Detects.

Jim Serne, PE, QSTI

TRC Environmental Corporation

5540 Centerview Drive

Raleigh, NC 27606

(919) 256-6231

(919) 302-2520 (cell)

(919) 838-9661 (fax)
##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 
 Mr. Gregor Mirow
Schlossstr. 4
Rißtissen
Germany
    
    Micromet, Inc.
2110 Rutherford Road
Carlsbad, California 92008Phone: (760) 494-4200
Fax: (760) 431-9980
E-mail: info@micromet-inc.com
Internet: www.micromet-inc.com
  Re: Separation Agreement
   1. Separation.
 2. Severance Benefits.




---



##### 




  provided, however,
 3. No Other Compensation or Benefits.
 4. Expense Reimbursements.
 5. Return of Company Property.
 2




---



##### 



6. Proprietary Information and Other Continuing Obligations.
 7. Confidentiality. provided, however,
 8. Nondisparagement.
 9. Resignation and Release.
 10. Cooperation.
 3




---



##### 



provided, however, provided
further,
 11. Breach.
 12. Miscellaneous.
 4




---



##### 



Micromet, Inc.By:
    /s/ Christian ItinName:
    Christian ItinTitle:
    President and CEOAgreed to and Accepted:/s/ Gregor K. MirowGregor Mirow 5




---



##### 



CONSIDERATION PERIOD
  Agreed:/s/ Gregor K. MirowExecutive Employee SignatureJanuary 9, 2007Date 6




---



##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 
 Exhibit A
 Employee Invention Assignment and Confidentiality Agreement




---



##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 
 Exhibit B
 Form of Release
 RELEASE AGREEMENT
 1. Consideration.
 2. General Release. known or reasonably
knowable known and unknown (a) (b) (c) (d)




---



##### 



3. ADEA Waiver.
 4. Section 1542 Waiver.
 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to
exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have
materially affected his settlement with the debtor.
  Agreed:Micromet, Inc.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:Christian ItinPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:Gregor Mirow
The primary objective of the data analysis is to estimate the overall (or ‘mean’) level of bite

protection and associated 95% confidence interval for different ‘treatments’ (i.e., different combinations of fabric type, number of washes, and mosquito species). The statistical validity of the design and analysis after reviewing the statistical design, analysis methods and submitted SAS code are given below: The numbers of blood

-fed and total female mosquitoes found with treated and control fabric for each subject was analyzed as binomial distributed data in a generalized linear model using SAS GENMOD procedure using a log link. Use of the log link makes it possible to obtain an estimate and confidence interval for the ratio of the treatment and control bite

-through rates. However, the subject term was treated as a fixed effect in the GENMOD model to adjust for subject

subject differences. If this treatment of fixed subjects is a valid assumption then the presented analysis is appropriate. However, if the fixed subject treatment is not appropriate and the subjects used in this study should be treated as a random effect then the SAS procedure GLIMMIX is a better approach over GENMOD to accommodate mixed effects (both fixed and random effect)

.
Please see the SAS output below: (SAS GLIMMIX when treating subjects as RANDOM)


### Examination of T and GLiM CIs with 8 Subjects**– Using SAS GLIMMIX**  **Subject -** **Subject Background Variation (Logit SD) = 0.3 Subject** **- Subject Protection Variation (Lo** **git SD) = 0 NrSims = 5000, Seed = 98135183** 

**Overall Bkg**  **Rate,% True**  **% Prot**  **Mean %**  **Prot T**  **HalfWidth**

**T CI**  **Coverage**

**T CI**  **Mean %**  **Prot GLiM**  **HalfWidth**

**GLiM CI**  **Coverage**

**GLiM CI**  **10** 70 68.3 12.3 95 69.6 14.0 99 85 84.2 8.2 95 84.7 8.7 98 95 94.8 4.3 94 94.9 4.6 99 98 97.9 4.2 93 97.9 3.3 98**Overall Bkg**  **Rate,% True**  **% Prot**  **Mean %**  **Prot T**  **HalfWidth**

**T CI**  **Coverage**

**T CI**  **Mean %**  **Prot GLiM**  **HalfWidth**

**GLiM CI**  **Coverage**

**GLiM CI**  **25** 70 69.5 7.0 94 69.8 9.6 99 85 84.7 4.8 95 84.8 5.8 99 95 94.9 2.7 94 94.9 2.9 99 98 98.0 1.6 94 98.0 1.8 98

**Overall Bkg**  **Rate,% True**  **% Prot**  **Mean %**  **Prot T**  **HalfWidth**

**T CI**  **Coverage**

**T CI**  **Mean %**  **Prot GLiM**  **HalfWidth**

**GLiM CI**  **Coverage**

**GLiM CI**  **50** 70 69.9 4.5 95 70.0 6.3 100 85 84.9 3.2 95 84.9 3.8 99 95 95.0 1.8 95 95.0 1.9 98 98 98.0 1.2 94 98.0 1.2 98

**Overall Bkg**  **Rate,% True**  **% Prot**  **Mean %**  **Prot T**  **HalfWidth**

**T CI**  **Coverage**

**T CI**  **Mean %**  **Prot GLiM**  **HalfWidth**

**GLiM CI**  **Coverage**

**GLiM CI**  **75** 70 69.9 3.4 96 70.0 4.1 99 85 85.0 2.5 95 85.0 2.7 98 95 95.0 1.5 95 95.0 1.4 98 98 98.0 0.9 94 98.0 0.9 97
ex10_1.htm





 





	  	  	Exhibit 10.1
	  	
January 13, 2011

	  























VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS



	
Vernon Associates, LLC


12540 Beatrice Street, Suite #203


Los Angeles, California 90066


Attn: Mr. Ed Elsner and Mr. William D. Feldman

	  











	
           Re:

	
Notice of Exercising Option to Renew Lease – Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease —Net dated January 1, 2002 (as amended, the “Lease”) by and between Vernon Associates, LLC ("Lessor") and Overhill Farms, Inc. ("Lessee") covering premises located at 2727 and 1657 E. Vernon Avenue, Vernon, California (the “Premises”)







 


Dear Messrs. Elsner and Feldman:


 


Lessee is pleased to inform you that it is exercising its option to renew the Lease for an additional five (5) year period pursuant to the terms of Section 3.1 of the Addendum to the Lease.  We look forward to meeting with you in the near future to discuss a fair market value rental rate for the Premises during such extension term.  Please contact us to set a time to meet as soon as possible.


 


                                                                                                                                                                                          








	 	
Sincerely,


 


 

	 
	 	OVERHILL FARMS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Tracy Quinn	 
	 	 	Tracy Quinn	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation July 2 2 , 2015

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590



## Griffi n Aerial

, LLC

Section 333 Petition to Operate Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Addendum: Adding an additional airframe

Prepared by:

Reed Frick

CEO Griffi n Aerial

, LLC

182 W Rock Ave

New Haven, CT 06515

978

- 994

- 5448

reed.frick@gmail.comAddendum : Adding an additional airframe

The Petitioner would like to add another airframe and has s upplied the following additional

i nformat ion:

3D Robotics Solo Op eration Manual and Flight Check list

Additional Unmanned Aircraft System s requested to operate under this request:

3D Robotics Solo

The petitioner states that the unmanned aircraft (UA) to b e operated under this request are less

than 55 lbs. fully loaded, fly at a speed of no more than 50 knots, carry neither a pilot nor

passenger, carry no explosive materials or flam mable liquid fuels, and operate exclusively within

a secured area as set out in the POH s

.

The Solo is a four

- rotor manufactured by 3D Robotics. The VTOL quadrotor

- type design has four

motors, GPS, full autonomous autopilot capabilities, telemetry and manual ground control. In

addition, the craft has integrated safety features built into the design of the UAS, as described in

the Operation Manual , to ensure the safety of persons and property within and surrounding the

limited operating area. The petitioner further describes that, in the event the UAS loses

communications or its GPS signal, the UA will have the capability to return to a pre

- determined

location within the Security Perimeter and land. It will also have the capability to abort a flight in

the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

This	airframe	was	released to	the market	after	the	initial	Petition	was	filed	and	the

Petitioner,	Griffin	Aerial	LLC,	wishes	to	include	the	airframe	as	part	of	the original request.

Reed	Frick

CEO	G riffin	Aerial,	LLC
Document

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE 
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC.
2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES
(SECOND AMENDMENT and RESTATEMENT EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018)


    Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (Second Amendment and Restatement Effective as of January 1, 2018) (the “Plan”), effective as of August 1, 2020.
    Section 5.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Section 5.2.  Security For Benefits.  Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.1, nothing in this Plan shall preclude the Corporation from setting aside amounts in trust (the “Trust”) pursuant to one (1) or more trust agreements between a trustee and the Corporation.  However, no Participant or Beneficiary shall have any secured interest or claim in any assets or property of the Corporation or the Trust and all funds contained in the Trust shall remain subject to the claims of the Corporation’s general creditors.  In furtherance of the foregoing, in the event of a Potential Change in Control or a Change in Control (as such terms are defined in the Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. Rabbi Trust Agreement by and between the Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (or its successor trustee) effective as of August 1, 2020 (or any successor trust agreement to the foregoing agreement) (the “Trust Agreement”)) or upon any other event specified in the Trust Agreement, the Corporation shall contribute (or cause to be contributed) to the Trust established thereunder assets in the amounts, and in accordance with the terms and conditions, as set forth in the Trust Agreement, provided that any such contribution would not result in a transfer of property within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code as contemplated by Sections 409A(b)(2) or (3) of the Code.”
































        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed on this 21st day of July, 2020.




LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC.






By:  /s/ Michele R. Kuhrt    


Name:   Michele R. Kuhrt


Title:     Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer


    -2-
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInterim Staff Guidance

# Interim Staff Guidance Associated with Japan Lessons Learned

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 02, 2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALD PIERRE CARTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-88-338-JFM, CA-96-1335-JFM)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Pierre Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Carmina Szunyog Hughes, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carter, Nos.

CR-88-338-JFM; CA-96-1335-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Mark B. Hoffman, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
May 27, 2004

| |  | /s/ Mark B. HoffmanMark B. Hoffman Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Charles Boynton, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
May 27, 2004

| |  | /s/ Charles BoyntonCharles Boynton Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2740

LT Case No. 2021-CF-012227-A

_____________________________

GENE ALEXANDER FREEMAN, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Louis A. Rossi, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Miranda L. Butson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

December 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
EPA SANITIZED 

STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 07/20/07 

CASE NUMBER: P07-0553

RELATED CASES: 

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS 

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX 

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 1 

KEYWORDS: LUNG OVERLOAD 

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT 

FATE: Solid 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 EC (E) 

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E) 

BP > 400 EC (E) 

H < 1.00E-8 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo 

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong 

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

HEALTH: Absorption is nil all routes (pchem). Concern for lung 

toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble 

particles (D50 = 1 - 2 μm; D90 = 5 - 6.5 μm). 

 *CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Inhalation) 

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are: 

fish 96-h LC50 = * P 

daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P 

green algal 96-h EC50 = * P 

fish Chronic Value (ChV) = * P 

daphnid ChV = * P 

algal ChV = * P 

based on SARs for surface-treated ; SAR chemical class = 

particle - ; NavgMW >100,000 with 0% < 1000; hardness <150.0 

mg/L as CaCO3, ECs based on 100% active ingredients and nominal 

concentrations, and TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

low concern for toxicity; 

assessment factor = 10.0 

concern concentration (CC) = * mg/L 

*CEB ECOTOX: No releases to water 

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 564-8916
TransAKT Ltd.: Exhibit 4.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com




Panasonic

Yearly sales contract

2010 communication product dealer Taiwan Halee CORP. ( 8M17+8M18+8M19+ 8M20
  ) yearly sales contract

Contract number: SE-8M17-2010-0401

Taiwan Halee CORP. ( Hereinafter called A )

  Panasonic Taiwan Co., Ltd. SE SECT. ( Hereinafter called B )

	1. 	Period: 2010/04/01 – 2011/03/31
	 	 
	2.	 Target: During the contract period,A should purchase from B for the following
      target amount:




	 	Amount	Achievement rebate
	2010 target	NTD 320,000,000	0.40%
	2010 challenge target	NTD 380,000,000	0.5%




	1.	The 1st, 2nd half year target should be set up between A and B.
	 	 
	2.	The rebate should be calculated base on the actual sales amount.
	 	 
	3.	Reward: In the end of the contract period, if A can achieve the yearly
      target, B have to follow this contract to give achievement rebate to A 




	NOTE:	1.	The period of validity for this contract from 2010/04/01 to 2011/03/31
	 	 	 
	 	2.	The above amount is including 5% selling tax.


 

	/s/Taiwan Halee CORP.	/s/Panasonic Taiwan Co., Ltd.
	(executed by corporate seal)	(executed by corporate seal)
No. 07

- 15

- 00270

- CR

Dwayne McGowan Appellant

v. The State of Texas Appellee § § § § From the 52nd District Court of Coryell County November 9, 2016 Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 9, 2016 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the j udgment of the trial court is modified as set forth in the opinion and affirmed.
Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below fo r observance.

o O o
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03509

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Wing Support Squadron-171 Sponsors Yahata Gakuen Orphanage Christmas Party

By Lance Cpl Muriah KingMarine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
No. 82-1082.

#### Rupe *v.*Blake et al.

Sup. Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNRC Maps

# NRC Maps of Fuel Cycle Facilities

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement States
          - Decommissioning Sites
          - Emergency Preparedness Maps
          - Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)
          - NRC Regions
          - Nuclear Materials Facilities
          - Power Reactors
          - Radioactive Waste Sites
          - Research and Test Reactors
          - Uranium Recovery Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 31.2Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATIONS     I, John Kallas, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.(the “Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 11, 2005   /s/ JOHN KALLAS   John Kallas  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of CCC