alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jeffrey A. Hawthorne, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photon Dynamics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                                  
|Jeffrey A. Hawthorne President and Chief
Executive Officer
|                                                          
|Date: August 16, 2004
#### Baumgartner and wife, Appellants, vs. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, Respondent.

*May 1*

June *4, 1935.*

*Harold J. McGrath*of Milwaukee, for the appellants.

*George A. Gessner*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Fairchild, J.

The appellants here were defendants in another action in the circuit court wherein Dorothea Arndt was the plaintiff. That action grew out of a dispute over a broker’s commission. The appellants recovered judgment on their counterclaim, and thereafter instituted supplementary proceedings against Dorothea Arndt in an effort to collect that judgment. On the day when the examination of Dorothea Arndt was to take place, the attorney for Arndt advised appellants that his client intended to appeal from the judgment and would give the usual undertaking to secure stay *443of execution. Upon this representation the supplementary proceedings were held open without date, and the matter permitted to rest there. The following day an undertaking signed by the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the respondent in this action, together with a notice of appeal, was served upon the attorney for the appellants. No notice thereof was served upon the other parties to the action, and the undertaking was never filed with the clerk of the circuit court for Milwaukee county as required, in order to perfect the appeal.

The appellants yielded up an advantage without securing its equivalent or guarding against the very thing that occurred, the failure to take the appeal. There had been a promise of giving a sufficient undertaking to stay the execution of the judgment. No inquiry was made as to whether the undertaking had been filed and the appeal perfected. In reviewing the matter upon the appeal from the civil court, Judge Aarons noted that “the docket entries do not show the serving on or filing with the clerk of any notice of appeal or undertaking on appeal.” It appears that the promise to perfect the appeal and furnish the undertaking was made on May 14, 1930; that on July 30, 1931, a motion was made to require the filing of the original notice of appeal and undertaking ; and that this motion was denied. The undertaking recites that “the above named plaintiff feeling aggrieved . . . intends to appeal ... to the supreme court of the state of Wisconsin.” It is there stipulated, in substance, that, if the said judgment so appealed from is affirmed, the appealing party will pay the amount directed by the judgment to be paid, and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company became surety therefor to the extent, of $250. No liability on the part of the surety company could arise unless and until the appeal was actually taken. That event never happened. We agree with the decision of the trial court, and are *444also of the opinion that this case is ruled by *Mueller v. Rice,*149 Wis. 548, 136 N. W. 146. The appeal never having been taken in the case in which appellants had judgment, this court never acquired jurisdiction, and the stipulation of the undertaking never came to be an effective liability.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-102338, 333-13259, 333-05795, 333-05797,
333-53842, 333-69717, 333-27927, 333-27929, 333-09257, and 333-91801) and Form
S-3 (Nos. 033-61903 and 333-89836) of American Science and Engineering,
Inc. of our report dated May 21, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 29, 2003
No. 85-1663.

#### Tolliver *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Griffith*v. *Kentucky, ante,*p. 314.
#### STATE v. WARREN PATRICK.

An appeal to the Supreme Court will be dismissed, when the defendant files no appeal bond, and there is no order allowing him to appeal without, granted upon the usual affidavits of inability, &c.

Indictment, larceny, tried before *miliard, J.,*at the Fall Term, 1874, of Pitt Superior Court.

The defendant was convicted on the trial below and appealed. No bond accompanied the record nor was there an order allowing the defendant to appeal without the usual security.

On the calling of the case in this Court, on motion of the-Attorney-General the appeal was dismissed.

No counsel in this Court, for defendant.

*Attorney-General Hargrove,*for the State.

Pee CuRIám.

Appeal dismissed for want of appeal bond, or affidavit of inability.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Shant S.
 Hovnanian, certify that:1.
I have
 reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Speedus Corp.;2.
Based on my
 knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
 fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
 in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my
 knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
 in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
 for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The
 registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
 Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
Designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
 and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
 information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
 subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
Evaluated
 the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
 presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
 this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in
 this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
 reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
 (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
 has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
 registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
The
 registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
 recent evaluation of  internal
 control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
 committee of the registrants  board
 of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
All significant
 deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
 control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
 affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
 financial information; and(b)
Any fraud,
 whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
 a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
 reporting.  Date:
August 14,
 2007By:
/s/ Shant S.
 HovnanianName:
Shant S.
 HovnanianTitle:
Chairman of
 the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 18
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**HARDWIRED INTERACTIVE INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hardwired Interactive, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph C. Passlaqua, Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Joseph C. Passlaqua and will be retained by Hardwired Interactive, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date:  October 6, 2011

*/s/ Joseph C. Passalaqua*

 Joseph C. Passalaqua

President

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(iii)A(86)









AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
ACUITY BRANDS, INC. 
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of October 24, 2019, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and Barry R. Goldman (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2019 (“Severance Agreement”) and amended as of May 28, 2019 and August 20, 2019, providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “55%” from clause (i) and substituting “75%” in lieu thereof.


		
	2.
	This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date(s) written below.


	
				
	 
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
	 
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

	/s/ Barry R. Goldman
	 
	By:  
	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel

	Barry R. Goldman
	 
	 
	VERNON J. NAGEL

	 
	 
	 
	Chairman and CEO
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 771 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-466, K2025-463.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27929 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                       7,035,725
<SECURITIES>                                13,556,808
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,954,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,289,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,292,680
<PP&E>                                       4,805,490
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,946,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,321,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,664,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,138,309
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,349,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,321,258
<SALES>                                     20,534,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,734,431
<CGS>                                        9,222,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,243,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,117,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,904,252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,212,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation
(the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Open Text Corporation and will be retained by Open Text Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    ALAN HOVERDAlan HoverdChief Financial Officer


Dated: May 14, 2003
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 156 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 

initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the 

arbitration of initial contract negotiation disputes, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations First 

5 Contract Negotiations Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES. 

7 Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 158) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new subsection: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 156 IH

1 ‘‘(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certifi2 cation of a new representative of employees for the pur3 pose of collective bargaining, the employer of the employ4 ees and the representative have not reached a collective 

5 bargaining agreement with respect to the terms and condi6 tions of employment, the employer and the representative 

7 shall jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on 

8 which the employer and the representative cannot agree. 

9 ‘‘(2) If the employer and the representative are un10 able to agree upon a mediator, either party may request 

11 the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to select 

12 a mediator and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation 

13 Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 

14 mediator. 

15 ‘‘(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the 

16 selection of a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the 

17 employer and the representative have not reached an 

18 agreement, the employer or the representative may trans19 fer the matters remaining in controversy to the Federal 

20 Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitra21 tion.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Sergey Boyer, Appellant, v Mary Pacifico, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 609]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated September 11, 2002, which denied his motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue his prior cross motion to restore the action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, was not based on new facts which were unavailable to him at the time of the defendant’s motion to dismiss and his prior cross motion to restore the case to the trial calendar. Therefore, the motion was, in effect, one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable *(see Ali v Tip Top Tows,*304 AD2d 683 [2003]; *Tittman v Rappaport,*287 AD2d 709 [2001]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, *JJ.,*concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, P. Thomas Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/    P. THOMAS
JENKINSP. Thomas JenkinsChief Executive Officer




Dated: May 17, 2004