alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Gwyther, Mike" <Mike.Gwyther@gdfsuezna.com> Date: 7/21/2010 12:17 PM Subject: Re: Request for extension: Mt Tom CWA ICR - Draft for comment Attachments: pic30581.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Mount Tom Generating company. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30581.gif)

From: "Gwyther, Mike" <Mike.Gwyther@gdfsuezna.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Harris, Milton" <Milton.Harris@gdfsuezna.com>, "Vodopivec, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Vodopivec@gdfsuezna.com>, "Merchant, Richard" <Richard.Merchant@gdfsuezna.com>, "Merchant, James" <James.Merchant@gdfsuezna.com>

Date: 07/02/2010 10:47 AM

Subject: Request for extension: Mt Tom CWA ICR - Draft for comment

Dear Ms. Alicea:

On June 18, 2010, Mount Tom Generating Company (Mt. Tom) received the information collection request (ICR) authorized by the Clean Water Act to develop effluent limitations and standards for Steam Electric Power Generating industry. We have reviewed the content of the 6 parts of the ICR (A,B,C,D, H, and I) to which we are required to respond. Our review indicates that the amount and the detailed nature of the information requested will require Mt. Tom to locate and hire outside technical help to assist in compiling a complete response. The proposed deadline for the 90-day response also comes at a time where Mt. Tom's resources have already been dedicated to other regulatory obligations.For these reasons, Mount Tom respec tfully requests that the EPA extend our 90-day response deadline to 120 days. This extra time will allow for a more accurate and thorough response to the ICR which will ultimately benefit the EPA in this data collection effort.

Best Regards,

Mike Gwyther Plant Manager Mt. Tom Generating Co., LLC 200 Northampton Street Holyoke, MA 01040 Ph: (413) 536-9562 Fx: (413) 536-9554 mike.gwyther@gdfsuezna.com
No. 82-1049.

#### Erwin *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 10th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1592 

To remove penalties for health insurers under the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2017 

Mr. YOHO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To remove penalties for health insurers under the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act and Health Care 

and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Holding Health Insur5 ers Harmless Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR FOR PRIVATE SECTOR HEALTH IN7 SURANCE PROVIDERS FROM ACA PENALTIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), no 

9 health insurance issuer offering health insurance coverage 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1592 IH

1 nor sponsor of a group health plan shall be penalized, 

2 fined, or otherwise punished by any agency or instrumen3 tality of the United States Government for a failure of 

4 such coverage or plan to comply with any of the applicable 

5 requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

6 Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconcili7 ation Act of 2010 (including under the amendments made 

8 by such Acts). 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with 

10 respect to the requirements under section 2704 and sec11 tion 2714 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 300gg–3 and 300gg–14), including the regulations pro13 mulgated pursuant to such sections. 

14 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

15 (1) The term ‘‘agency or instrumentality’’ 

16 means any department or independent agency of the 

17 United States Government that is tasked with en18 forcing applicable requirements of the Patient Pro19 tection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 

20 Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

21 (2) The terms ‘‘health insurance issuer offering 

22 health insurance coverage’’ and ‘‘sponsor of a group 

23 health plan’’ shall be construed as consistent with 

24 use of such terms for purposes of the Patient Pro25 tection and Affordable Care Act, and shall include 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1592 IH

1 any sole proprietorship, partnership, for-profit cor2 poration, nonprofit corporation, or any other non3 governmental entity that engages in the sale or dis4 tribution of health insurance products. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-134741) of Union Drilling, Inc. of our reports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Union Drilling, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Union Drilling, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                                |  |  |  |                  
|------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|                                |  |  |  | Ernst & Young LLP
|                                |  | 
|Fort Worth, TexasMarch 10, 2008 |  |  |  |
No. 90-6116.

#### Canterbury *v.*Kalisz.

Ct. App. Mich. Cer-tiorari denied.
Supplementary
Agreement of Investment Cooperation

     

    Party A:
Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd.

    Party B:
Ming Zhao

    Party C:
Jianping Gao

    


    Party A,
Party B and Party C (collectively, “Co-Investors”) entered into Investment
Cooperation Agreement on August 1, 2010.  After friendly negotiation,
the Co-investors hereby amend and supplement the Investment Cooperation
Agreement as follows:

    


    1, The
acquisition of physical mining assets and mining right of Pinglu County
Xiapincun Coal Mine (“Xiapincun Coal Mine”) will be included into Phase Two of
the Pinglu Project;

    


    2, The
entire mining assets of Xiapincun Coal Mine will be placed into Shanxi Pinglu
Dajinhe Anrui Coal Industry Co., Ltd.

    


    
      	
              Party
      A: Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd.

            	
              Party
      B: Ming Zhao

            	
              Party
      C: Jianping Gao

            
	
              Representative
      (Singature/Seal): /s/ Ming Zhao

            	
              Party
      B’s Signature: /s/ Ming Zhao

            	
              Party
      C’s Signature: /s/ Jianping Gao

            


    

    


    January
10, 2011
No: II-19-017 April 16, 2019

Contact: Roger Hannah, 404-997-4417

 Joey Ledford, 404-997-4416

NRC Schedules Open House to Discuss

Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant Performance

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for May 8 to provide 

information and answer questions regarding the safety performance of the Sequoyah nuclear power 

plant, including the recent annual assessment letter covering all of 2018.

The open house will run from 5-6 p.m. at the Sequoyah Training Center, 2600 Igou Ferry Rd., 

Soddy-Daisy, Tenn. NRC employees responsible for plant inspections, including the resident inspectors 

based full-time at the site, will be available at the open house.

The two-unit Sequoyah plant, operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority, is located near 

Soddy-Daisy, approximately 16 miles northeast of Chattanooga.

The NRC concluded that the Sequoyah plant operated safely during 2018. At the end of the 

year, all inspection findings and performance indicators were green or of low safety significance.

Earlier in 2018, the two Sequoyah units were under increased NRC oversight due to an 

inspection finding in the security area. An NRC inspection determined that TVA’s corrective actions 

were adequate and the plant returned to the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands 

of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or performance

indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC oversight.

Inspections are performed by the NRC resident inspectors and inspection specialists from the

NRC Region II office in Atlanta.

The annual assessment letter, which includes upcoming inspection plans for the plant, is 

available on the NRC website. Current performance information for Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 is also 

on the website and is updated on a quarterly basis.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 1, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00343

- CV

IN RE SATURNINO NIRA AND ASPHALT INC. L.L.C.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23616

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presidi ng



### O R D E R

Original Proceeding 1

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justi ce

Lori I

. Val enzuela, Justice

On August 17, 2021, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for stay

pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.  This court believes a serious

question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further considera tion. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b).  The respondents and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in

this cour t no later than September 21, 2021. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 52.4

.

Relators’ request for a stay is GRANTED.  The September 7, 2021 trial setting is

STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus

.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 23616, styled Alyson Lewis v. Saturnin Nira and Asphalt Inc.

LLC d/b/a Lone Star Paving , pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The orders at issue

in this original proceeding were si gned by the Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Presiding Judge of the 408th Judicial

District Court, Bexar County, Texas; the Honorable David Canales, Presiding Judge of the 73rd Judicial District

Court, Bexar County, Texas; the Honorable Tina Torres, Presiding J udge of the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas; and the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Presiding Judge of the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas.It is so ORDE RED September 1

, 202 1

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______ ____________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
No. 86-5736.

#### Burke *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0157

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

IOLA MAERRIEA JOHNSTON

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 16, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 10 2022

11/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0157
No: I-19-008 April 11, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss

2018 Performance of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the 2018 safety performance of Seabrook 

Station, operated by NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, during a public meeting on April 24 in 

Hampton, N.H. 

The meeting will be held at the Best Western Plus – The Inn at Hampton,

815 Lafayette Road, from 6-8 p.m. NRC staff responsible for plant inspections, including the

resident inspectors based full-time at the site, will be available to discuss its performance. NRC staff 

and a representative from the Federal Emergency Management Agency will also discuss each 

agency’s role in emergency planning at Seabrook and respond to questions.

Seabrook operated safely during 2018. At the end of the year, all inspection findings and 

performance indicators were of very low safety significance, or green. As a result, it remains under 

the NRC’s normal level of oversight, which entails thousands of hours of inspection each year.

The NRC Reactor Oversight Process uses color-coded inspection findings and indicators to 

measure plant performance. The colors start at green and increase to white, yellow or red, 

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. Inspection findings or 

performance indicators with more than very low safety significance trigger increased NRC 

oversight. 

Inspections are performed by two resident inspectors and specialist inspectors from the 

Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa. 

The annual assessment letter, as well as the meeting notice, are available on the NRC 

website. Information on Seabrook’s current performance is also available and is updated quarterly.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 50913 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Vincent Lamar Barnett, Jr.,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 566

- 1

Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Vincent Lamar Barnett, Jr. , has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barnett has filed a response. To the extent that Barnett

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion shoul d not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 5, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50913 Document: 00515849395 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2021No. 19

- 50913

2 argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of these claims; we therefore d ecline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014)

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Barnett ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 19-50913 Document: 00515849395 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2021
## Schaeffer, John

From: Sent: John Schaeffer <Schaeffer.John@epamail.epa.gov> Monday,July07, 20!4 10:24 AM 

### To: Schaeffer, John 

### Subject: Attachments: Fw: HPV3 CASRN 72162-15-3- Submission ofTest Plan 

### by Dover Chemicalfor EPA Review Sulfurized 1-Decene_EPA Submitai_Feb_2012.rsb.pdf

John Schaeffer Senior Biologist USEPA!OPPTICCD/CITB 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Mail Code: 7405M Phone: 202-564-8173

----- Fomarded by John Schaeffer/DC/USEPNUS on 07/07/201410.23 AM--

From: Bob Boethling/DG/USEPAIUS To: Chuantung lirliDC!USEPAIUS@EPA, Paul Campanella!DC/USEPAIUS@EPA Cc· Johr1 Schaeffer/DC/USEPA!US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA, TracyWilliamson/DCIUSEPAIUS@EPA, Myrta Christian/DCIUSEPAIUS@EPA Date: 02/24/2012 03:46PM Subject: Ra: HPV 3 CASRN 72162-15-3- Sllbmission of Test Plan by Dover Chemical for EPA Review

I agree with their test plan as regards biodegradation, but see below. Forwhat it's worth, I also agreewith Daniel re the p/chem props. 

### !can't remember what's in the HPV-3 rule re biodegradation; specifically, is 

### it ready or inherent biodegradationtesting? 

### ! believe HPV-1 had inherent testing and itthat's the case tor HPV-3, then there's still a needto test, since the subject chemical(s) mayshow degradation in this type oftest. But if HPV-3 has ready only, then yes, there's nota need to run it.

Here is their pdf butwith edits on pages 5 and 9, because even though I agree with the basic conclusion, there arefactual
errors in what they sayabout biodegradability. 

### (See attached file: Sulfurized 1-Decene_EPA Submital_F eb _2012.rsb.pdj) Robert Boethling, PhD Exposure Assessment Branch US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention andTaxies 1200 Pennsylvania

### Ave, NW (7406M) Washington, DC 20460 202-564-8533 (P) 202-564-8892 (F) 

### [EPI Suite] http://www.epa.gov/opptlntr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm

[FatePointer] http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/search.asp
Chuantung Lin---02/22/2012 "10:37:11 AM---Hi Paul, I have reviewed the proposedtest plan (the attached file} from Sponsor ofthis chemical (D

From: Chuantung lin/DC/USEPNUS To: Paul Campanella/OC/USEPNUS@EPA Cc: Bob Boethting/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA, John Schaeffar/DC/USEPNUS@EPA, Marcus Aguitar/DC/USEPNUS@EPA, TracyWilliamson/DC/USEPNUS@EPA, Myrta Chrislian/DCIUSEPNUS@EPA Date: 02122/2012 i 0:37AM Subject: Re: HPV 3 CASRN 72162-15-3 -Submission of Test Plan by DQverChemical for EPA Review

1
No: 19-050 October 21, 2019

CONTACT: David McIntyre, 301-415-8200

NRC Imposes $43,500 Civil Penalty on California Firm

for Unlicensed Importation and Distribution of Radioactive Material

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has imposed a $43,500 civil penalty on Solis Tek Inc. 

of Carson, Calif., for importing and distributing radioactive material without a proper license.

From 2014 through 2018, Solis Tek imported light bulbs containing krypton-85 and 

distributed them for sale in the United States. Certain halide bulbs contain small quantities of

krypton-85 gas as a starting aid in high-intensity lamps. While consumers do not need a license to 

possess or use such bulbs, a company that distributes them is required to have an “exempt 

distribution license” from the NRC. This license authorizes distribution to unlicensed wholesalers or 

retailers. 

Solis Tek did not have an exempt distribution license when it began importing and 

distributing the bulbs through its facilities in New Jersey and California. Despite several 

notifications from the NRC and New Jersey regulators regarding the need to obtain a license or

cease distribution of the krypton-85 bulbs, the company continued its activities. Solis Tek 

eventually received an NRC exempt distribution license in July 2017, which the NRC has now 

terminated at the company’s request. Solis Tek is no longer distributing krypton-85 bulbs.
No. 82-5624.

No. 82-5747.

#### Cabrera-Martinez *v.*United States; and Bautista *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 684 F. 2d 1286.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    MATZEL & MUMFORD AT APPLE RIDGE II, L.L.C.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 84,247
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           6,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         1,273,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,364,488
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,364,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,364,488
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,364,488
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0

        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2004, and for the period then ended.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ Glade M. Knight                    
|Glade M. Knight Chief Executive Officer
|                                       
|/s/ Bryan Peery                        
|Bryan Peery Chief Accounting Officer   



March 9, 2005
(September 14, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Russell J. Carbone, on Behalf of John Osorio, Petitioner, v Warden of Queens House of Detention, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 528]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 3849/95.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail on Queens County Indictment No. 3849/95 to the sum of $20,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum as a cash bail alternative. Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.