alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Wendy F. DiCicco, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kensey Nash
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  May 17, 2004               /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
                                  -------------------------
                                  Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA
                                  Chief Financial Officer







                                       31
No. 86-5963.

#### Taylor *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jeffrey A. Hawthorne
    
    /s/ Maureen L. LambJeffrey A. Hawthorne
    
    Maureen L. LambPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute On Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; GEMSSTAR.
    Date: February 23, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Isis S. Mikhail, MD, MPH, DRPH, National 
Institute On Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 
2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b161210131a1217121b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94d9dddfdcd5ddd8ddd4f9f5fdf8bafafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 15, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00928 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 91-6127.

#### In re Jersimski.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Argued and submitted May 25,

affirmed as modified September 7, 1983

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of WALLACE, *Appellant, and*WALLACE, *Respondent*

(D8107-65432; A25886)

668 P2d 1248

Herbert A. Trubo, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Cynthia A. Croft, Lincoln City, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Frederick J. Ronnau, and Kulla & Ronnau, P.C., Lincoln City.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Newman, Judges.

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

*486VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution decree. He contends that the trial court erred in awarding wife a $10,000judg-ment against him in recognition of her contribution to his education during the parties’ relationship. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The trial court denied wife’s request for spousal support. It ruled, however, that because wife was the “sole wage earner” during the parties’ relationship she was entitled to “recognition for her contributions” to husband’s education. The court awarded her a judgment for $10,000.

Assuming *arguendo*that husband’s potential for increased income resulting from his undergraduate degree is personal property subject to division pursuant to ORS 107.105(1), *but see Grove and Grove,*280 Or 341, 357, 571 P2d 477, *modified*280 Or 769, 572 P2d 1320 (1977), the record here contains *no*evidence of its value. The trial court specifically found that spousal support was not indicated. Therefore, the judgment cannot be sustained as spousal support needed for retraining or education pursuant to ORS 107.105(l)(c)(H). We conclude that the record here will not support the judgment.

We have considered husband’s remaining arguments: that the trial court erred in awarding certain assets to wife, in requiring husband to pay certain indebtedness and in awarding attorney fees to wife. We find no error.

Decree modified to delete $10,000 judgment against husband; affirmed as modified. Costs to husband.
**Exhibit 3.1.31**

 

**ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**

 

**OF**

 

**EQUINOX FITNESS SAN MATEO, INC.**

 

I.

 

Thename of this corporation is Equinox Fitness San Mateo, Inc.

 

II.

 

Thepurpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for whicha corporation may be organized under the GENERAL CORPORATION LAW of Californiaother than the banking business, the trust company business or the practice ofa profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code.

 

III.

 

Thename and address in the State of California of this corporation’s initial agentfor service of process is:

 

GKL Corporate/Search, Inc.

 

Thiscorporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares of stock; and thetotal number of shares which this corporation is authorized to issue is 200shares zero par value.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned hasexecuted these Articles of Incorporation of Equinox San Mateo, Inc. this 1st day of March, 2004.

 

 
|   | /s/ Jeffrey M. Weinhaus                                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jeffrey M. Weinhaus, Incorporator                                        |
|   | Rosen Weinhaus LLP  40 Wall Street, 32nd Floor  New York, New York 10005 |

 

----
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC Staff, Utility to Discuss Four Apparent Violations Involving DecommissioningProcedures at Haddam Neck

----

----

I-98-127

December 9, 1998

**NRC STAFF, UTILITY TO DISCUSS FOUR APPARENT VIOLATIONS INVOLVING DECOMMISSIONING PROCEDURES AT HADDAM NECK**

Four apparent violations of Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements at the Haddam Neck nuclear power plant involving decommissioning work will be the subject of a meeting between plant officials and agency staff on Wednesday, December 16.

The predecisional enforcement conference, scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, will be open to the public for observation.

Located in Haddam, Conn., and owned by the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Haddam Neck permanently ceased operations in December 1996. During inspections conducted at the facility from July 20 through September 11, NRC inspectors identified apparent violations related to inadequate procedures for decontamination of the reactor coolant system and related activities.

The apparent violations, which were detailed in an NRC inspection report issued on October 29, are:

Failure to adequately check for leaks in the reactor coolant system before commencing chemical flushing of the piping, which contributed to leakage inside plant buildings of about 1,200 gallons of contaminated water on July 27;

Failure to adequately anticipate and address problems that affected flow equipment during the July 27 decontamination work;

Failure to ensure that resins used to clean up contaminated water would not shift locations under high flow conditions during reactor coolant system decontamination work, as occurred on August 11; and

Failure to provide procedural guidance and worker training on how to rig a 5-ton pipe trench floor block so that it could be moved, contributing to a loss of control of the block on August 2. A rigging attachment failed, causing the block to fall two inches and strike another floor block, but no workers were injured and the structural integrity of the block that was struck was not compromised.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No: IV-19-011 May 3, 2019

Contact: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Issues Confirmatory Order to Idaho State University

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Idaho State 

University, which has agreed to a series of actions designed to improve its processes and procedures 

for the use of radioactive materials.

The Confirmatory Order is the result of the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution process, 

which was requested by the university to address violations identified by the NRC in a 

Jan. 10, 2019, inspection report. The process involves mediation facilitated by a neutral third party 

with no decision-making authority, who assists the NRC and a licensee in reaching agreement when 

there are differences regarding an enforcement action.

In the inspection report, NRC identified one apparent violation considered for escalated 

enforcement involving the failure to secure two portable gauges containing radioactive material to 

prevent unauthorized access or removal.

Following significant corrective actions taken by the university, the NRC has decided not to 

issue a Notice of Violation or civil penalty. Under terms of the Confirmatory Order, the university

has agreed to improve its handling of radioactive materials as identified by a third-party auditor.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-125518, 333-133357, 333-142844 and 333-150730) of XenoPort, Inc. pertaining to the 1999 Stock Plan, the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 2005Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the New Hire Option Agreement between Vincent J. Angotti and Registrant, and the New Hire Stock Unit Award Agreement between Vincent J. Angotti and Registrant of XenoPort, Inc., and Form S-3 (No. 333-156485)of our reports dated February 24, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of XenoPort, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of XenoPort, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2008. 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

Palo Alto, California 

February 24, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                   |  |                         |  | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  | /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann  |  | 
|                   |  | Joseph W. Kaufmann      |  | 
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-834V

UNPUBLISHED

LAURIE MAROWSKI on behalf of her

minor child, A.M.,

 Petitioners,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: November 2, 2021

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On February 1, 2021, Courtney and Christopher Counts filed a petition for 

compensation on behalf of their minor child, M.C., under the National Vaccine Injury 

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2 Petitioner alleged that 

A.M. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on February 1, 

2018. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On October 29, 2021, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw 

the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Philippine Navy Frigate BRP Antonio Luna Tests Firepower during RIMPAC 2022 Live-fire Exercise 

By Petty Officer 1st Class Jennifer Martinez and Kenny Turco

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1355

In re: VINCENT SHAMONT ROGERS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:08-cr-00216-MGL-2)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Shamont Rogers, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Shamont Rogers petitions for a writ of 

mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in 

ruling on his motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. We find that 

the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district 

court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the financial statements included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      3,024,013
<SECURITIES>                               12,896,200         
<RECEIVABLES>                              30,277,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                  330,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           64,282,389 
<PP&E>                                     63,009,856
<DEPRECIATION>                             12,161,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            148,632,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      17,546,664
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      252,199
<OTHER-SE>                                 92,592,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              148,632,042
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           26,350,565
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              24,758,748 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              536,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            755,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,055,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                  399,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           655,615
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  655,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02
        

</TABLE>