alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection with the Annual Report of Georgian Bancorporation, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gordon
R.  Teel,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  and Philip Ekern, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, respectively, do each certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Gordon R. Teel
------------------------------------
Gordon R. Teel
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2004


/s/ Philip Ekern
------------------------------------
Philip Ekern
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2004


<PAGE>
### FAA MCAI INFORMATION FORM **To: Airworthiness Authority of ___________________** In support of the FAA’s actions to address your country’s mandatory continued airw orthiness information (MCAI) in the United States, please provide the items highlighted below by _________________, IF not contained in the referenced airw orthiness directive (AD) or service information. **Aircraft Manufacturer/Model ECAA AD/Revision No./Date**  **Service Bulletin/Revision No./Date**  HP 137 Mk1 & Series 200 , EASA AD 2013

- 0208 SB 32

- A

-JA851226 Revision 5 Jetstream 3100 & 3200 Series dated 10 September 2013 Date d 30 April 2013 Aircraft 1.1. Describe the unsafe condition, AND its root cause. Include description of how the p roblem could affect the safe operation of the airplane. MLG collapse was caused by cracking of the forward yoke pintle, which was the result of corrosion pits leading to stress corrosion at the top outer edge of the forward yoke pintle and extended along the top of the yoke pintle. The yoke pintle mate rial was identified as DTD 5094, which is susceptible to stress corrosion

. After MLG collapse, the aircraft departed the runway, which prompts the risk classification to be Hazardous. 

### 2. Provide the number and description of occurrences, which prompted the AD

. Stress corrosion cracking of DTD 5094 standard ML G yoke pintles is a known issue and has previously occurred in

- service on the HP 137 Jetstream 31, Series 200 and Jetstream 31 Series aircraft. 

### 3. What is the compliance time and consequences if extended? What would be considered an appropriate grace period for compliance? The compliance time remains the same as the previous revision of the bulletin; w ithin 12 months or 1,200 landings, whichever is th e sooner (the next NDT inspection). 

### 4. Cost of parts and/or installation workhours for the owner/operator (data from the manufacturer and their supplier, if applicable). It will take approximately 14 workhours to carry out the inspection task

. 

### 5. If parts are required, are they available for all aircraft? No parts are required. 

### 6. What category

best describes the unsafe condition: __X__Design Problem _____Quality Control Problem _____Operational _____Maintenance _____Unapproved Parts _____Other (Speci fy) 7. Should a ferry

flight be permitted? If no, why not? ____Yes

__

X__No For the inspection, the aircraft should already be in the possession of a competent MRO. 

### 8. Number of aircraft affected, b y model designation and serial number (U.S. regi stered and worldwide). 44 US registered Jetstream 31 series aircraft 22 US registered Jetstream 32 series aircraft Including the US registered aircraft, approximately 255 Jetstream 31 & 32 series aircraft are in service worldwide. 

### 9. Is further action ant icipated to be necessary t o correct this unsafe condition? I f so, please provide description and recommended compliance time. No further action required. 

### 10. Other: Copy of the referenced SB attached. 

### Date: 18/09 / 2013 **Ai rcraft Certification Service**  **Federal A**

**viation A dministration**
<PAGE>

                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-QSB/A

    (X)  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
       For the Quarterly period ended   July 31, 1996

                                          OR

    ( )  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1939

         For the transition period from __________________ To _________________
    Commission File Number: 0-28514
                            -------

                             TREASURY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

            DELAWARE                          98-0160284
--------------------------------         ---------------------
(State or other jurisdiction             (I.R.S. Employer 
of incorporation or organization         identification number)

1181 Finch Ave. West, Unit 21, North York, Ontario  M3J 2V8
-----------------------------------------------------------
            (Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer's telephone number, including area code:  416-663-4194 Check whether 
                                                 ------------
the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) 
of the exchange act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period 
that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been 
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                    Yes                No  X
                        ------            ---

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of 
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, par value
$.0001 per share                            13,973,690
-----------------------                --------------------
       Class

<PAGE>
                                  SIGNATURES

      In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereinto 
duly authorized.

Dated: December 4, 1996               TREASURY INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                              BY /s/ JAMES HAL
                                              ----------------------------
                                              James Hal, President

                                              BY /s/ HOWARD HALPERN
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Howard Halpern, Principal
                                              Financial Officer

                                       2

<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX
                                 -------------

Exhibit No.                      Description
-----------                      -----------

    27                           Financial Data Schedule
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 6, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00813

- CV

Yevgenia Shockome, Appellant

v.

Robert Brendel, Barbara Trevino

- Kuvet, Stratos Apostolou, Mary F. Iverson,

Randolph V. Gonzalez, Cary Street Pa rtners, Riverstone Wealth Management,

Kyle Coward, Beth Layman, First Clearing, Tara Randle, River Del Llano,

Amber Vasquez Bode, Erin Lemaster, Noelle Davis, Timothy Shockome, and

Does 1 through 20, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS C OUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE LLY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLEE S ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on October 24, 2019

.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having reviewed the record , the Court

agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court gra nts the motion and dismisses

the appeal. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### Rice B. Pierce *v.*Edmund Myrick,

From Halifax.

In trespass for killing a slave, an outrage by the. slave less than a threat- ' eoed felony, will justify the killing.

In such an action, evidence of the slave’s good character is admissible, to repel the presumption of his improper conduct..

In trespass, where not guilty, and a justification are pleaded, and the *Jury find the*first issue for the Defendant, the rejection of admissible testimony pertinent to the latter only, is not ground for a new trial.

Trespass for killing the negro of the Plaintiff. The Defendant picad Not Guilty, and a Justification,

On the trial, before Dahiei, Judge,' after giving in evidence circumstances from which the killing by the Defendant might be interred, the Plaintiff offered evidence of the peaceable and submissive character of the slave, in order to rebut the presumption of such ill conduct in him, us would justify the Defendant in killing him, if the Jury should infer tiiat he was killed by the Defendant. This evidence was objected to by the Defendant, and rejected by the Judge.

His Honor instructed the Jury, that if thecircumstan-ces in proof before thorn, rendered it probable to their minds, that the Defendant killed the negro, they should find fur the Plaintiff, unless they collected from those circumstances, a reasonable inference that the slave was killed by the Defendant, to defend his person or property from some threatened- felpny. s

The entry of the verdict was, <£ the Jury find ail the issues in favor of the Defendant, and the Defendant not guilty.”

A rule for a new trial being discharged, the Piaiutiff appealed.

No Counsel appeared for the *Plaintiff.£adger,*for the Defendant, submitted the case without argument.

*346Henderson, Judge.

The Plaintiff has certainly nt> ground to complain of the charge of the Judge, for it left ° „ , *n*° the Deiendant very narrow grounds, on which to rest his justification — too narrow, in the case of an outrage attempted by a slave1.

As to the evidence of tiie genera! good character, and orderly deportment of tiie slave offered by the Plaintiff, and rejected by the. Judge, 1 think it should have been received, to repel tiie presumption, relied on by the Defendant as a justification, it was relevant, as it tended in the absence of positive prool, to throw light upon the subject, and aid the Jury in arriving at the most probable conclusion, as to the circumstances under which the act was committed by the Defendant, if in fact it was committed by him. But the Plaintiff is not entitled to a new trial on that ground, because the Jury having found the Defendant *not guilty,*the justification could not have been passed on by them. Although they have found all the issues in favor of the Deiendant, (which is a very improper way of entering a verdict, as the facts in issue should be either affirmed or disaffirmed,) yet they also find the Defendant *not guilty.*We cannot impute to the, Jury the absurdity of saying, that the Deiendant was justified in an act, which they at the same time say he did not commit.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
#### CORN BELT BANK, petitioner, v. Bernard ARMSTRONG.

No. 87-432.

Supreme Court of the United States.

*288Nov. 2, 1987.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Denied.
Order entered October 31, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00961-CV

THE CITY OF BLUE RIDGE, Appellant

V.

FRANK RAPPOLD AND OLGA RAPPOLD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND 

OF K.R., A MINOR CHILD, AND OF F.R., JR., A MINOR CHILD, AND LINDA 

RAPPOLD, Appellees

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-05678-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ October 29, 2019 motion to extend time to file their 

response brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time for appellees to file their response 

brief to December 2, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gordon Quick, President and Chief Executive Officer of Daleen Technologies,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004
(the Form 10-Q) fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 17, 2004 /s/ GORDON QUICK  
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q and shall not be treated as having
been filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
# C_2011219EN.01000802.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland), lodged on 13 May 2011 — BGŻ Leasing Sp. z o. o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

(Case C-224/11)

2011/C 219/11

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: BGŻ Leasing Sp. z o. o.

Applicant and appellant:

Defendant and respondent: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

Defendant and respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (a) | Must Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as meaning that the service providing insurance for a leased item and the leasing service are to be treated as separate services or as one single, comprehensive, composite leasing service? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Must Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as meaning that the service providing insurance for a leased item and the leasing service are to be treated as separate services or as one single, comprehensive, composite leasing service?

1

| (b) | If the answer to the first question is that the service providing insurance for a leased item and the leasing service are to be treated as separate services, must Article 135(1)(a) of Directive 2006/112, in conjunction with Article 28 thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the service providing insurance for a leased item is to be exempt in the case where the lessor insures that item and charges the costs of that insurance to the lessee? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

If the answer to the first question is that the service providing insurance for a leased item and the leasing service are to be treated as separate services, must Article 135(1)(a) of Directive 2006/112, in conjunction with Article 28 thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the service providing insurance for a leased item is to be exempt in the case where the lessor insures that item and charges the costs of that insurance to the lessee?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   NOV-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                 21,625
<SECURITIES>                           17,263
<RECEIVABLES>                          44,387
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,771
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       93,173
<PP&E>                                  5,735
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        141,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  40,918
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   15
<OTHER-SE>                             99,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          141,402
<SALES>                                71,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       71,998
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          65,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         6,896
<INCOME-TAX>                            2,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     4,011
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            4,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           $0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                           $0.25

         

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                           AGREEMENT OF INTERPRETATION
                         REGARDING EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                                       OF
                                 DAVID B. COREY

         WHEREAS, David B. Corey (the "Executive" herein) and Daleen
Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company" herein) have previously
entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 31, 1998 (the "Employment
Agreement"), which was subsequently amended by an "Amendment to Exhibit B of
Employment Agreement" dated September 10, 2001; and

         WHEREAS, the parties to the Employment Agreement wish to set forth
their interpretation of certain actions to be taken by the Company with respect
to its employment of Executive;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

                                       1.

         Effective as of October 1, 2001 (the "Effective Date"), the parties
agree that the duties and responsibilities of the Executive under the Employment
Agreement shall be temporarily (for a period of 3 months from the Effective
Date) modified so that the Executive shall accept primary responsibility for
sales and marketing efforts of the Company in the Asia Pacific region. The
length of the temporary assignment may be extended only with the mutual consent
of both the Executive and the Company. The parties agree that this modification
of the duties and responsibilities of the Executive would otherwise be a
significant diminution of duties as defined by the Employment Agreement however,
the parties have agreed upon an exception to the Executive's duties as set forth
in Section 13 of the Employment Agreement only for the 3 month period as set
forth herein. As a result, the parties agree that this modification of the
duties of the Executive by the Company for the 3 month period does not result in
a "constructive discharge" of the Executive under Sections 4.A.1. and 4.D.4. of
Exhibit B of the Employment Agreement. Executives agreement to the terms herein
does not constitute a waiver of any terms of the Employment Agreement by the
Executive except as expressly set forth herin for his change of duties during
the 3 months period.

                                       2.

         The parties hereto agree that the Executive's title is not being
modified by reason of the modification of the duties and responsibilities of the
Executive described under paragraph 1 above.

EXECUTIVE:                                 COMPANY:

                                           Daleen Technologies, Inc.



/s/ David B. Corey                         By: /s/ James Daleen
-------------------------------------          ---------------------------------
David B. Corey
Date: October 23, 2001                     Its: Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: October 23, 2001
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  March 31, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                    |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | By:    | /s/                  *Jenifer                  Osterwalder          * |
|                                  |   | Jenifer                  Osterwalder                                                                                    |
|                                  |   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                |

----