alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Louise ISAACS, Debtor. THOMSON-MACCONNELL CADILLAC, INC., Plaintiff, v. Louise ISAACS, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 1-81-00143.

Adv. No. 1-81-186.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

Nov. 12, 1981.

Ronald A. Lipez, Cincinnati, Ohio, for debtor-defendant.

David S. Levine, Cincinnati, Ohio, for creditor-plaintiff.

ORDER DETERMINING DEBT TO BE DISCHARGEABLE

L. C. GARTNER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This cause came on to be heard upon the complaint filed by a creditor, Thomson-Mac-Connell Cadillac, Inc., on June 12, 1981 to determine the dischargeability of a debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523; upon the answer of the debtor, Louise Isaacs, filed on July 1, 1981; upon the testimony, evidence and the law.

Debtor’s petition for relief lists an unsecured debt to creditor in the amount of $2,000.00. Such debt arose from a transaction entered into in May, 1980 by the parties herein, whereby creditor leased to debt- or a 1980 Cadillac automobile. Creditor contends that the debtor obtained the lease by submitting a materially false financial statement upon which creditor reasonably relied and therefore seeks to have such debt determined to be nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B).

The standard of proof of each of the required elements in this section is by clear and convincing evidence. *In Re Campbell,*No. 56018 (S.D.Ohio, 1972). In this instance, the creditor does not meet the challenge to support such a conclusion.

Creditor herein has not demonstrated effective and reasonable reliance merely by showing that the application for the lease and financial statement (Plaintiff Ex. 1) was partially used to support creditor’s action. See, *In Re Whiting,*10 B.R. 687, 4 C.B.C. 543 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Penn.1981). Actually, the document form itself is somewhat confusing, so that it is difficult to determine if it is a financial statement. The financial information must be the backbone of the issuance of credit, even though the creditor makes other independent credit inquiries.

*211The disclosure of Mrs. Isaacs was sketchy, but the lessor suggested that it had other means of gathering data — hence, the subject was not heavily emphasized. Before granting the lease, creditor ran a credit check through G.M.A.C.

In addition, plaintiff has not demonstrated that defendant possessed an intent to deceive. Creditor contends that defendant’s failure to list a $40,000.00 tax liability on the lease application supports a determination of non-dischargeability. Creditor’s application requests only a listing of credit references and installment obligations. No guidelines existed nor did plaintiff request that tax liabilities or any other kind of liability be listed.

From debtor’s point of view, the tax assessment is not in the same category of debts as those requested and there was a good question of her responsibility for it. Her understanding (unrefuted) of such liability is that it is mostly her husband’s.

Accordingly, the debt of Louise Isaacs to Thomson-MacConnell Cadillac, Inc. in the amount of $2,000.00 is determined to be dischargeable.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Zoran Corporation (the “Company”) for theperiod ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Levy Gerzberg, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   August 11, 2008 | /s/ Levy  Gerzberg                     |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                               | Levy Gerzberg                          |
|                               | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 94777)    

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 790 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-495, K2025-493.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-28014 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 91-6247.

#### Fonder *v.*Wisconsin.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





I, Thomas A. Feil, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association.





Date: March 24, 2023


By:/s/ THOMAS A. FEILName:*Thomas A. FeilTitle:PresidentCapital One Auto Receivables, LLC* Thomas A. Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Finds Performance 'Acceptable' at San Onofre in Latest Review

----

----

RIV: 99-18 April 8, 1999

 

**NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE 'ACCEPTABLE' AT SAN ONOFRE IN LATEST REVIEW**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains acceptable in the NRC's latest plant performance review at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station located near San Clemente, California.

Officials of NRC and Southern California Edison (SCE) will discuss the review during a meeting set for Thursday, April 22, at 1 p.m. in the Training & Education Center at the plant site. The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials, and members of the public.

In a letter to SCE Executive Vice President Harold B. Ray NRC Branch Chief Linda J. Smith said, "Overall, performance was acceptable." Operating performance was characterized by effective operator responses to both normal and transient conditions, and engineering programs effectively supported operations and maintenance activities. Field maintenance and surveillance testing were conducted well. Plant Support performance was generally effective. The review identified some performance weaknesses in each functional area that are being addressed by SCE's corrective action program. The performance during this period does not warrant any additional inspection effort above the core inspection program except for a regional initiative inspection to assess compensatory measures in security that were specified in the previous PPR.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region IV Office of Public Affairs and the NRC web site.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight plants beginning in June and, if found acceptable, will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92892-92893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27581]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-205-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone 220; Application for Subzone; Wurth 
Electronics Midcom, Inc.; Watertown, South Dakota

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Sioux Falls Development Foundation, grantee of FTZ 220, 
requesting subzone status for the facility of Wurth Electronics Midcom, 
Inc., located in Watertown, South Dakota. The application was submitted 
pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 
400). It was formally docketed on November 20, 2024.

[[Page 92893]]

    The proposed subzone (8.03 acres) is located at 121 Airport Drive, 
Watertown, South Dakota. No authorization for production activity has 
been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to 
the existing activation limit of FTZ 220.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
[email protected]. The closing period for their receipt is January 6, 2025. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted through January 21, 2025.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Camille Evans at 
[email protected].

    Dated: November 20, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27581 Filed 11-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
Exhibit 31.2



I, Richard Okumoto, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photon Dynamics, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO                                  
|                                                     
|Richard Okumoto Secretary and Chief
Financial Officer
|Date: May 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Union Drilling, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Christopher D. Strong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Christopher D. StrongName:

Christopher D. StrongTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 6, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32



                                 Certification
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS
  (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Instinet Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:


      The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:      March 12, 2004                        /s/ Edward J. Nicoll
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Edward J. Nicoll
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                                   /s/ John F. Fay
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John F. Fay
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Record ofDiscussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Evans, Maynard J 8/18/2014 Concur. 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

Other/ Additional Information: 

10
#### Hanson, Appellant, vs. Nelson, Respondent.

For the appellant: *M. J. McDonald*and *Beznor, McDonald & Beznor,*attorneys, and *Lee K. Beznor*of counsel, all of Balsam Lake.

For the respondent: *Nelton & McGinnis*of Balsam Lake, attorneys, and *G. Burgess Ela*of Madison of counsel.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-268   -      -CV

IN RE InN rReE RoOnNaAlLdD J. HoOlLlLeEmMaAnN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  :   GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  August 201, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Scipio M. Carnecchia, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the Company) and I, Rick E. Russo, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by this Report.



/s/ Scipio M. CarnecchiaScipio M. CarnecchiaPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Rick E. RussoRick E. RussoSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)Date: November 6, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange of 1934, as
amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph C. P. Shieh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 22, 2009



|       |  |                          
|------ |  | -------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /S/    JOSEPH C. P. SHIEH
|Name:  |  | Joseph C. P. Shieh       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA - 2012 - 0803 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM214AD

777 - 55A0015, R1 --- 1/31/08 777 - 55A0015, R2 --- 12/4/08 777 - 55A0015 IN 01 --- 1/14/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008