alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                          16,974
<SECURITIES>                                   136,221
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                       261
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,318
<PP&E>                                          33,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,652
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,903
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                     374
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,742
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 6, 2024

NO. 03-23-00618-CV

A. S., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on October 5, 2023. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

          - [File No. P085405]

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 4, 2024, concerning its proposal to extend for an additional three years the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) clearance for information collection requirements contained in the rules and regulations under the Pay-Per-Call Rule. Shortly after publication, Commission staff learned the document contained an incorrect date. The Commission issues this correction to reflect the corrected date. The current information collection clearance expires on January 31, 2025, not January 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        P. Connell McNulty, Attorney, Division of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, (202) 326-2061,                         *pmcnulty@ftc.gov.*
      ( print page 93603)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice document submitted by Commission staff for publication contained a typographical error; specifically, the expiration date for the current OMB clearance was off by one year in the SUMMARY.

## Correction

                    In notice FR Doc. 2024-25559 appearing at 89 FR 87575 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Monday, November 4, 2024, make the following correction. On page 87576, in the last sentence of the                     **SUMMARY**                     section, the date of “January 30, 2024” is corrected to read “January 31, 2025”.                

Dated: November 20, 2024.

April J. Tabor,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-27794 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
NO. 07-11-0267-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL B AUGUST 4, 2011

__________________ ____________ ROSHELLE RENE HOUSER a/k/a ROSHELL RENEA JONES, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________ _____________ FROM THE 264th DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY; NO. 66,191; HON. MARTHA J. TRUDO, PRESIDING

__________________ _____________ ABATEMENT AND REMAND

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Roshelle Rene Houser a/k/a Roshe ll Renea Jones, appellant, appeals her conviction for forgery by passing. Appellant timely perfected her appeal. The clerk’s record was filed on June 14, 2011, and no reporte r’s record was taken. Appellant’s brief was due on July 14, 2011. The brief was not f iled by that date and on July 22, 2011, the court notified counsel that he ha d until August 1, 2011, to either file appellant’s brief or file an extension motion. To date, neither a brief nor an extension motion have been received by the court.2 Those convicted of criminal acts are entitled to effectiv e assistance of counsel on appeal. The failure of counsel to timely prosecute an appeal falls short of rendering such assistance. Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 46th District Court of Bell County (t rial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be gi ven and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine 1) whether appellant desires to prosec ute this appeal, 2) whether appellant is indigent and ent itled to appointed counsel, and 3) whether appellant’s current attorney was appointed or retained. The trial court is ordered to execute pertinent findings of fact on these matters. S hould it be found that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigen t, and her current legal couns el was appointed, then the trial court is ordered to remove appellant’s cu rrent legal counsel and appoint another to zealously represent appellant ’s interest on appeal. T he name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar num ber of the new attorney mu st also be included in the court's findings of fact and conclu sions of law. Lastly, the tr ial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter's reco rd transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the afor ementioned hearing. The foregoi ng supplemental clerk's and reporter’s records must be filed by the trial court with the cler k of this court on or before September 2, 2011. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before September 2, 2011. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
H. R. 1362 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in Pago Pago, American Samoa, the Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, PAGO PAGO, AMERICAN SAMOA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, shall after the date 

of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 

‘‘Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic’’. Any reference 

to such community-based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, 

map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall 

be considered to be a reference to the Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a 

Hunkin VA Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1446 

To amend section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 

State and local officers and employees from performing immigration 

officer functions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. MOORE, Mr. SOTO, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. CORREA, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, and Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to prohibit State and local officers and employees 

from performing immigration officer functions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No State Resources 

5 for Immigration Enforcement (NSRIE) Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1446 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PERFORMANCE OF IMMIGRATION 

2 OFFICER FUNCTIONS BY STATE AND LOCAL 

3 OFFICIALS. 

4 Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(g) The Secretary of Homeland Security may not 

7 enter into a written agreement with a State, or any polit8 ical subdivision of a State, pursuant to which any officer 

9 or employee of the State or subdivision is authorized to 

10 carry out a function of an immigration officer in relation 

11 to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens 

12 in the United States (including the transportation of such 

13 aliens across State lines to detention centers).’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT NESTOR SANTIAGO M ALLARI, Pe titioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-73670 Age n c y No. A086-924-473 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ne stor Sa ntia go M a lla

ri, a native and c itiz e n of the Philippine s, pe t itions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing him a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, and re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture (“ C AT” ). Our jurisdic tion is 

# FIL ED JAN 26 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).gove rne d

by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w de novo que s tions of la w a nd for substa ntia l e vide nc e fa c tua l findings. Tamang v . Holde r , 598 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th C ir. 2010). W e dismiss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w. The a ge n c y

found tha

t M a lla ri did not e sta

blish c ha nge d or e xtra ordina

ry c irc um s ta nc e s to e xc use the untim e ly filing of his a sy lum a

pplic at ion. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re v ie w this finding be c a use the unde rly ing fa c t s a re dispute d. Se e Gasparyan v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1130, 1134 (9th C ir. 2013). Thus, we dismiss the pe tition a s to M a lla

ri’ s a sy lum

c la im . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de te rm ination tha t M a lla ri fa ile d to e s ta b lish tha t the Ne w Pe ople ’ s Arm

y would bem o tiva

te d to ha rm him on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. Se eIN S v . Elias-Zac arias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992); se ealso Ayala v . Holde r , 640 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th C ir. 2011) (m istre atm e nt m o tiva

te d by re tribution doe s not be ar a ne xus to a prote c te d ground). Thus, his withholding of re m ova l c la im

fa i ls. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of M a l la ri’ s C AT c la im be c a use he fa ile d to e s ta

blish tha t it is more like ly tha

n not tha t he would be torture d by

or at the instiga

tion of or with the

c onse nt or a c quie s c e nc e of the gove rnm e nt if re turne d to thePhilippine s. S e e Santos-Le mus v . Muk

ase y , 542 F.3d

1 3 - 7 3 6 7 0 2738, 747-48 (9th C ir. 2008), abrogated on othe r grounds by He nrique z-Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t and DE NIE D in par t.

1 3 - 7 3 6 7 0 3
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT FRANCISCO CALVO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-638 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed December 14, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Francisco Calvo appeals his judgment and two consecutive life sentences for sexual battery on a child less than twelve. Calvo contends that his sentencing forms contain scrivener's errors which fail to credit him 985 days of jail time served. Notwithstanding his consecutive life sentences, Calvo is still entitled to credit for time served on the first life sentence. See Steadman v. State, 23 S o. 3d 811, 813 (Fla. 2d- 2 - DCA 2009). However, because the trial court made no oral prono uncement awarding credit for time served, we affirm the sentences without prejudi ce to Calvo filing a motion pursuant Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm t he remaining issues raised on appeal without comment. Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
                                    
<S>                              <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                   682
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         29,020
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,277
<INVENTORY>                            3,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      16,816
<PP&E>                                14,347
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        50,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  6,557
<BONDS>                               13,624
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 137
<OTHER-SE>                            30,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          50,531
<SALES>                               17,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      28,064
<CGS>                                  4,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         28,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         293
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           31
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       31
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                              31
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.03)
                                    

<FN>
*Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
 doubtful account in the Statement of Financial Position.

Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line o n the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported at -0- herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC to Hold Predecisional Enforcement Conference with B. P. Chemicals, Lima, Ohio, on Apparent Violations

----

----

RIII-97-97

November 14, 1997

**NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH B.P. CHEMICALS, LIMA, OHIO, ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet November 19 with representatives of B.P. Chemicals, Lima, Ohio, for a predecisional enforcement conference on apparent violations of NRC requirements for decommissioning activities at its chemical production facility.

The meeting will start at 9:30 a.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. It is open to public observation. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from the news media and other interested observers.

The discussion will focus on B.P. Chemicals' apparent failure to oversee decommissioning activities adequately to assure compliance with federal regulations.

From 1964 to 1971 the company used depleted uranium as catalyst material for chemical production. Some of the resulting contaminated waste was placed into settling ponds and other localized places on site. Remediation of the facility began in 1991. Final decommissioning activities now under way include permanent on-site disposal of the low level contaminated sludge and soil in specially designed cells.

Violations to be discussed at the enforcement conference were found by NRC inspectors in September and October. These include having inspections done by contractors instead of by company personnel; inadequate oversight by company engineers; lack of the required daily log information and signatures; failure to collect and analyze certain required duplicate samples; failure to keep a set of project records off site; and failure to follow a specified contractor's laboratory procedures.

In response to NRC's inspection findings, B. P. Chemicals stopped decommissioning work and implemented immediate corrective measures. After reviewing the company's actions, NRC authorized the company to resume decommissioning.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


August 10, 1999


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


RE:  Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

          1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

          2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907) 1998 Employee Incentive
Compensation Plan


Ladies and gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated July 13, 1999 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
three-month and six month periods ended June 26, 1999 and included within the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement referred to above.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


Very truly yours,


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
THERMACELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                      Computation of Loss Per Common Share

                                                For the Three Months Ended
                                                       December 31,
                                          ------------------------------------
                                                1998                1997
                                          ----------------    ----------------
                                             (unaudited)         (unaudited)

Shares  outstanding:                          7,206,325           3,067,709
Weighted average shares outstanding           5,730,568           3,024,761

Net loss                                  $    (222,078)      $     (52,054)
                                          ----------------    ----------------
        
Net loss per common share                 $       (0.04)      $       (0.02)