alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Joint Statement by Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Director of Nat’l Intelligence 

By Secretary of State

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
0032939  of  Viper  Networks,  Inc.  pertaining  to  the  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Viper  Networks,  Inc.'s
management's  assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Viper  Network,  Inc.,  included in this Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Armando C. Ibarra
__________________________
ARMANDO C. IBARRA, CPA
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
March 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 2.2

                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO FORECLOSURE SALE AGREEMENT









<PAGE>

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           FORECLOSURE SALE AGREEMENT

This First Amendment to Foreclosure  Sale Agreement is entered into as of May 8,
2006 (the "AMENDMENT"), by and between SAND HILL FINANCE, LLC ("SHF"), BSGL, LLC
("BSGL"),  SERVGATE  TECHNOLOGIES,   INC.  ("Company")  and  CIROND  CORPORATION
("Purchaser").

                                    RECITALS

The undersigned are parties to a Foreclosure Sale Agreement dated as of April 4,
2006 (the "AGREEMENT").  The parties desire to amend the Agreement in accordance
with the terms of this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1.   Section  2  on  Schedule  B of the Agreement is amended to read as
follows:

         Secured obligations  owed to SHF not to exceed $2,100,000. Payments and
distributions to SHF are summarized as follows:

         a.  $150,000  by  April 7, 2006  -  SHF  acknowledges timely receipt of
payment

         b.  $100,000 by May 15, 2006

         c.  $500,000 by June 30, 2006

         d.  $500,000 by September 30, 2006

         e.  Outstanding balance by December 31, 2006

         f.  25.0% of proceeds from any OEM agreement and 15% of proceeds of any
sale  or  issuance of  equity or debt securities over $3,000,000 before December
31, 2006.

         2.   Unless otherwise defined, all initially capitalized terms in  this
Amendment  shall be as  defined  in the  Agreement.  The  Agreement,  as amended
hereby,  shall be and  remain in full force and  effect in  accordance  with its
respective terms and hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects. Except as
expressly set forth herein,  the execution,  delivery,  and  performance of this
Amendment  shall not operate as a waiver of, or as an  amendment  of, any right,
power,  or remedy of any party under the  Agreement,  as in effect  prior to the
date hereof. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original,  but all of which together  shall  constitute
one instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the first
date above written.

                                   CIROND CORPORATION


                                   By:    /s/ NICHOLAS MILLER
                                      ------------------------------------------

                                   Title:    PRESIDENT & C.E.O.
                                         ---------------------------------------
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Recirculation Suction Large Break LOCA Analysis of the Santa Maria De Garoña Nuclear Power Plant Using TRAC–BF1 (G1J1) (NUREG/IA-0067, ICSP–GA–LOCA–T)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Foreword

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0067 (PDF 1.40 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** August 1992

**Prepared by:** J. V. López, J. Blanco, Polytechnical University of Madrid J. L. Crespo, University of Cantabria R. A. Fernández, Nuclenor, S. A.

Polytechnical University of Madrid c/José Abascal, 2 28006-MadridSpain

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Foreword

This document presents a recirculation suction large break loss of coolant accident analysis of Santa Maria de Garoña Nuclear Power Plant.

The plant is a General Electric Boiling Water Reactor 3, containment type Mark I. It Is operated by NUCLENOR, S.A. and was connected to the grid in 1971.

The analysis has been performed by the Chair of Nuclear Technology from the Polytechnical University of Madrid, the Applied Physics Department from the University of Cantabria and the Analysis and Operation Section from NUCLENOR, S.A. as a part of an agreedment for developing an engineering simulator of operational transients and accidents for Santa Maria de Garoña Power Plant.

The analysis was performed using the frozen version of TRAC-BF1 (G1J1) code and is the first of two NUCLENOR contributions to the International Code Applications and Assessment Program (ICAP).

The code was run in a CDC Cyber 830 with operating system NOS 2.6, property of NUCLENOR, S.A. Additionally the code was updated into a CDC Cyber 932 operating system NOS VE, in order to solve the problems related to central memory limitations found at early stages of the work. A programming effort was carried out in order to provide suitable graphics capabilities to the code.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
2011 Executive Compensation Information



 Exhibit 10.45 
 Named Executive Officer Compensation Information – 2011 Salaries and Target Bonus Percentages 
 The table below provides information regarding the annual base salaries and target bonus percentages for the Company’s 2010 named executive officers currently employed by the Company for the 2011
performance period: 
  

					
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	2011 Annual Base Salary	  	2011 Target Bonus
Percentage
(1)
	 Ronald W. Barrett, PhD
 Chief Executive Officer
	  	$458,522	  	90%
	 William G. Harris

Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$351,405	  	40%
	 Vincent J. Angotti

Senior Vice President, Chief Commercialization Officer
	  	$405,863	  	40%

  

	(1)	Represents a percentage of 2011 annual base salary pursuant to the terms and conditions of the XenoPort, Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# Note to Editors -- News Media Briefing on Big Rock Point Decommissioning Process

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-19

February 24, 1997

**NOTE TO EDITORS -- NEWS MEDIA BRIEFING ON BIG ROCK POINT DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a briefing for the news media on March 3 on the decommissioning regulatory process. It will begin at 3 p.m. in the Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Station Annex.

NRC decommissioning project staff from the NRC Headquarters Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Rockville, Maryland, will brief news media in preparation for the next day's public meeting on the decommissioning of Big Rock Point. The March 4 public meeting is at 7 p.m. in the Charlevoix Township Hall (Stroud Hall), 12491 Waller Road in Charlevoix.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT
23
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 Ames
National Corporation
 Ames,
Iowa
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-146844 on Form S-8 of Ames National Corporation of our reports, dated
February 23, 2009 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
statements, and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ames National Corporation for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
 
 
 /s/
Clifton Gunderson LLP
 
 
 West Des
Moines, Iowa
 March 13,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY STEVEN AUSTIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CR-93-131, CA-95-177-2)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Steven Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a district court order adopting a magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1988) motion. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal.

Appellant raised four claims in his habeas motion, that his

counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to investigate defenses;

(2) failing to move for suppression of evidence; (3) failing to

file a motion for discovery; and (4) coercing Appellant to plead

guilty. The first and fourth allegations directly contradict Appellant's sworn statements in court during the criminal prosecution.

Those sworn statements conclusively foreclose these two claims

because the record contains no compelling circumstances that would

dictate a contrary result. Via v. Superintendent, Powhatan Correctional Ctr., 643 F.2d 167, 171 (4th Cir. 1981). The second and

third allegations state non-jurisdictional claims antecedent to the

guilty plea. They were waived by the guilty plea. Tollett v.

Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973).

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant's motion

for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 744 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-432, K2025-429.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27907 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-112735, 333-122016, 333-130402 and 333-131060)pertaining to the Corgentech Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Non-Plan Option Grants of our report dated March 24, 2006 with respect tothe consolidated financial statements of Corgentech Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Palo Alto, California 

March 29, 2006
No. 90-6073.

#### Crockett *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Allen Parish *v.*Jacob Fite.

From Mecklenburg;.

Practice. — The Court may in its discretion, permit new witnesses icr be introduced and examined before the Jury, after the argument of counsel are dosed and even after the Jury hare retired and come into Court to ask for further information. But the rule which forbids witnesses to be'introduced after the argument of the case has commenced, ought not to be departed-from, except for good rear sons, shewn to the Court.

Rule to shew cause why a new trial should not be granted, because after the Jury had retired under the charge, of the Court, they came into Court and requested that further evidence- might be heard by them , when the Court permitted two witnesses to be examined, who had not bce-n previously introduced.

The facts of the case were, that the Plaintiff had brought two actions of the same nature against the Defendant, and during the examination of the witnesses in the second,, and whilst the Jury were out deliberating on the first, two new witnesses appeared in tire secondj who deposed to facts which, in the opinion of the Court, were important, and whose evidence would have been equally important in the first. After the Jury in the second case had retired, the Jury kr the first came info Court, and stated that they were not likely to agree,-and wanted some further information, upon which the counsel for the Plaintiff moved for leave to introduce the two witnesses examined in the second case. The Court granted the leave, and there was a verdict for the Plaintiff.

Locke, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is certainly the regular and proper practice, never to suffer witnessed to be introduced after the first examination, particularly after the arguments of counsel are closed. Yet we are of opinion that the discretion of the Judge must govern this rule of practice} the rule is found-*259ei! on the temptation, which a departure from.it would hold out for-committing the crime of perjury. Where a Case has been argued and the party discovers the points ■on which it rests, the Coui;t will not permit him to support the weak parts of his case, by a re-examination of it, and this rule ought never to be departed from, unless the Court discover the necessity of a re-examination, and that it will not produce the evil, which it is the object of the rule to prevent. In this case, the Jury were in great doubt, and the evidence was sought for and asked by them. To satisfy them anil relieve them from, diffi- ' cully, the evidence w'as permitted to go to them. , The evidence was properly admitted and the rule must be discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL QUARTER TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 AS PRESENTED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              643,638
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,502,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                        418,692
<INVENTORY>                                       2,741,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,572,805
<PP&E>                                            1,243,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                      664,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,250,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,700,719
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              24
<COMMON>                                                847
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,548,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,250,484
<SALES>                                           5,501,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5,501,900
<CGS>                                             3,555,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,936,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     14,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (449,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (449,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (449,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        

</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# RELAP5/MOD2 Assessment, OECD-LOFT Small Break Experiment LP-SB-03 (NUREG/IA-0018)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0018 (PDF 2.73 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** April 1990

**Prepared by:** S. Guntay

Paul Scherrer Institute CH-5303 Wurenlingen, Switzerland

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An analysis of the experimental results and oost-test calculations using RELAP5/MOD2 carried out for OECD-LOFT small break experiment LP-SB-3 are presented. Experiment LP-SB-3 was conducted on March 5, 1984 in the.Loss-of -Fluid Test (LOFT) facility located at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). The experiment simulated a small cold leg break, with concurrent loss of high pressure injection system, and cooldown and recovery by feed and bleed of the steam generator secondary side and accumulator injection, respectively.

The analysis was under taken as a part of a program at EIR aimed at developing experience in using the latest generation of best estimate Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) analysis computer codes, and to improve understanding of Small Break LOCA transients and as well as a part of a program aimed at assessing the RELAP5/MOD2 code. The latest available version (Cycle 33 to 36.1) of the code was used. The particular test selected for the analysis included several phenomena potentially relevant to any PWR plant operating in Switzerland.

This report documents a short post-test analysis of the experiment emphasizing the results of additional analysis prerformed during the course of this task. RELAPS/MOD2 input model and results of the post-test calculation are documented. Included in the report is the results of a sensitivity analysis which show the predicted thermal-hydraulic response to a different input model.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the quarterly Report ofTJT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Terrence J. Sheldon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ Terrence J. Sheldon |
|-------------------------|
| Terrence J. Sheldon     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| February 14, 2003       |

 

----
No. 82-5888.

#### Phillips *v.*Washington.

Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.