alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Naval Facilities Engineering Command Visits NMCB-5 Seabees during INDOPACOM Deployment 

By Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Stephane BelcherNaval Mobile Construction Battalion 5

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 216 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Docket (050- 00424)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA C - Chemistry M - Maintenance / Repair 

170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA I - Instrumentation & Control T - Testing 

212

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content C - Chemistry M - Maintenance / Repair 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content I - Instrumentation & Control T - Testing 113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT G - Engineering G - Design 

318

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR147 - Individual corrective action LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA T - Testing 

I - Instrumentation & Control

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making T - Testing 

I - Instrumentation & Control

847

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER181 - Inadequate staffing / task allocation W - Work Control / Scheduling Outage Pla A - Administrative 182 - Work package quality LTA E - Electrical T - Testing 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 217 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Docket (050- 00424)

Work Planning & Practices / LER190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making T - Testing 

E - Electrical

318

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 17
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40768

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-152-2

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and PRADO and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Rodriguez appeals from the sentence imposed following his 

guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to manufacture and 

distribute methamphetamine. The district court imposed a within-guidelines 

sentence, sentencing Rodriguez to 136 months of imprisonment and five years 

of supervised release.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40768 Document: 00512741452 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2014
No. 13-40768

At sentencing, the Government withheld an additional one-level 

reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) for pretrial acceptance of responsibility 

solely because Rodriguez refused to waive his right to appeal. Rodriguez

objected, thus preserving the error for appeal; the district court denied the 

objection and sentenced him without the one-level reduction. Now on appeal, 

Rodriguez renews his claim that he should have been awarded the additional 

one-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to § 3E1.1(b). 

As we held recently in United States v. Palacios, __ F.3d __, No. 13-40153, 

2014 WL 2119096, at *1 (5th Cir. May 21, 2014), the amended version of 

§ 3E1.1 is applicable in a case such as this. Pursuant to the amended § 3E1.1, 

the Government may not withhold a § 3E1.1(b) motion because the defendant 

refuses to waive his right to appeal, as it did in this case. Thus, there was a 

procedural error during Rodriguez’s sentencing. The Government has not 

shown that this procedural error was harmless as to the imposed sentence. See 

United States v. Delgado-Martinez, 564 F.3d 750, 752-53 (5th Cir. 2009). 

Accordingly, Rodriguez’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED 

to the district court for resentencing consistent with this opinion.

2

 Case: 13-40768 Document: 00512741452 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2014
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mero Cedeno, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1016]

Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees and sentencing him to concurrent terms of incarceration of 25 years to life and *81h*to 25 years. The contention that the evidence is insufficient to prove defendant’s knowledge of the weight of the drugs has not been properly preserved by a motion to dismiss " 'specifically directed’ ” at that alleged defect in the proof *(People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19, quoting *People v Cona,*49 NY2d 26, 33, n 2). Similarly, defendant has failed to preserve his contentions concerning the adequacy of the Grand Jury instructions and the alleged repugnancy of the verdict. In any event, those contentions are without merit. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree is unduly severe and must be modified. Therefore, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; *People v Thompson,*60 NY2d 513, 519), we reduce that sentence from 25 years to life to 15 years to life. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/24/2014 17:58:43

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Oconee 1 Docket (050- 00269)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 

120

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content I - Instrumentation & Control M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

360

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Training / LER100 - Training LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

120

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 5
Order filed July 5, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-15-00986-CR

____________

BRETTON JAMES FOX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14CR0687

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s Exhibit 4 and 

State’s Exhibit 6.

The exhibit clerk of the 10th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk 

of this court the original of State’s Exhibit 4 and State’s Exhibit 6, on or before 

July 15, 2016. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep 

safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State’s 

Exhibit 4 and State’s Exhibit 6, to the clerk of the 10th District Court.

PER CURIAM
# C_2011219EN.01002101.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/21

---

Order of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v ECHA

(Case T-542/08) (1)

1

2011/C 219/33

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2785

___________

In re: Tommy F. Robinson; *

Carolyn Robinson, *

*

Debtors, *

-------------------------------------- *

Tommy F. Robinson; *

Carolyn Robinson, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Wildlife Farms II, LLC, also known *

as Mallard Pointe Lodge and Reserve * [UNPUBLISHED]

LLC; Bill Thompson; Boyd Rothwell, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: January 13, 2011

Filed: January 19, 2011

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

2

The Honorable James G. Mixon, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Tommy and Carolyn Robinson appeal the district court’s1

 affirmance of the

bankruptcy court’s2

 order restraining them from pursuing certain claims and defenses

in state court, on the ground that those claims and defenses are property of their

bankruptcy estates. After carefully reviewing the record, see In re Reynolds, 425 F.3d

526, 531 (8th Cir. 2005) (like district court, appellate court reviews bankruptcy court’s

fact findings for clear error and conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the

bankruptcy court’s order is enforceable for the reasons discussed by the district court,

see 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (bankruptcy court may issue any order necessary or

appropriate to carry out provisions of title). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B. 

______________________________
----

| Subsidiaries (1)                                                     |   | Percentage of Ownership |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                 |   |                    |   |
| First      National Bank, Ames, Iowa, a National Bank                |   |                    | 100    | % |
| Boone      Bank and Trust Co., Boone, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank       |   |                    | 100    | % |
| State      Bank & Trust Co., Nevada, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank    |   |                    | 100    | % |
| Randall-Story      State Bank, Story City, Iowa, an Iowa State Bank  |   |                    | 100    | % |
| United      Bank & Trust NA, Marshalltown, Iowa, a National Bank |   |                    | 100    | % |

| (1) | The      operation of Ames National Corporation’s five wholly owned subsidiaries      are included in the financial statements set forth in this Form      10-K. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
E-103
<PAGE>
The  Company promises to pay the prepayment premium amounts in the circumstances
and  on  the  terms  set  forth  in  Sections 2.5 and 2.6 of the Loan Agreement.
                                     --------------------

The  Company  promises  to  pay interest, to the extent permitted by law, on the
principal  balance  of  this Convertible Debenture at the rates per annum and on
the  terms  specified  in  Sections  2.3  and  2.4  of  the  Loan  Agreement.
                           -------------       ---

The  Company  agrees  to  make  mandatory  prepayment  of  the  principal amount
outstanding and any accrued but unpaid interest to the Lender in accordance with
Section  2.5  of  the  Loan  Agreement.
------------

The  Company  agrees  to  make payments due hereunder without deduction for tax,
pursuant  to  the  terms  of  Sections  2.9  and  2.11  of  the  Loan Agreement.
                              -------------       ----

All  payments  of  the principal of and premium and interest on this Convertible
Debenture  shall be made in the lawful currency of the United States of America,
by transfer of immediately available funds into a bank account designated by the
Lender  in  writing  to  the  Company.

The  Company  agrees  to pay, upon demand, all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
(including,  without  limitation, the reasonable fees and disbursements of legal
counsel  to  the Lender) associated with the waiver, enforcement or modification
of  the  Loan  Agreement  or  this  Convertible  Debenture.

The  Company hereby waives diligence, presentment, demand, protest and notice of
any  kind  whatsoever.  The  non-exercise  by  the  Lender  of any of its rights
hereunder  in  any  particular instance shall not constitute a waiver thereof in
that  or  any  subsequent  instance.

This  Convertible Debenture is the Convertible Debenture referred to in the Loan
Agreement, which Loan Agreement, among other things, contains provisions for the
acceleration  of  the  maturity hereof upon the happening of certain events, and
for the amendment or waiver of certain provisions of the Loan Agreement and this
Convertible  Debenture, all upon the terms and conditions therein specified.  In
the  event  of  any  conflict  between  the provisions of this Note and the Loan
Agreement,  the  provisions  of  the  Loan  Agreement  shall  govern.


                                      E-104
<PAGE>
THIS CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY
THE  LAWS  OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK.

                            *     *     *     *     *




                                      E-105
<PAGE>
IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Company  has caused this Convertible Debenture to be
signed  on its behalf by its duly authorized directors and to be dated as of the
day  and  year  first  above  written.


VI  Group  plc



By:     _____________________________
Name:  Elliot  I.  Miller
Title:  Deputy  Chairman



By:     _____________________________
Name:
Title:


                                      E-106
<PAGE>
No. 91-6203.

#### Guerra *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03509
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2247

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Eddie Johnson, also known as * Eddie Muldrew, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Eddie Mudrew, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 7, 2004 Filed: January 15, 2004

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Eddie Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), and 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- The district court 1 sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal Johnson’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is too long. We reject this argument, because the sentence is within both the statutory range and the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, and Johnson agreed in a written plea agreement that his prison term would be at least 121 months. See21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii) (penalty of 10 years to life imprisonment); United States v. Smotherman , 326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (district court’s exercise of discretion in setting defendant’s sentence within properly determined Guidelines range is nonreviewable), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 293 (2003); United States v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who voluntarily subjects himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal). Upon careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

              In  connection  with the Annual Report of Winsted  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Mark Ellis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

              1. The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

              A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section
906 has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         Date: April 28, 2006
                                          /s/  Mark Ellis
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Mark Ellis, Chief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01577**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01577\01577_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01577\01577_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01577\01577_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01577\01577_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01577\01577_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01577\01577_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01577\01577_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01577\01577_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01577\Certification Statement Plant ID_01577.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01577\Quest01577.doc questions on survey response



### 01577\Supporting Documentation\01577_Ash system diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01577\Supporting Documentation\01577_EIA _860 Aquila 2007 Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01577\Supporting Documentation\01577_EIA_860 Aquila 2007 schedule 6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01577\Supporting Documentation\01577_WNC SIte map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01577\Supporting Documentation\WNC Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\Ash handling.pdf reference for followup questions x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\Copy of Survey Part A_1.xls 01 31 11.xls reference for followup questions x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\Copy of Survey Part C.xls reference for followup questions x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\RE Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow-up 01577.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\RE Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow-up 01577_2.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 01577\Telecon Documents\Survey Part A.xls reference for followup questions

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

AMANI NIA BELL, 

Appellant, 

v. Case Nos. 5D22-575 

 5D22-576 

LT Case Nos. 2020-CF-424 

2021-CF-000600-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed March 7, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Citrus County, 

Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and

Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.