alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerging Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

| Date:       August 14, 2006 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|

 

| /s/ Christopher G. Payan    Christopher G. PayanChief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| /s/ Brian P. Alessi                               Brian P. AlessiChief Financial Officer |
Appendix 1 to IAI Document 4412/CERT/004Appendix 3 to IAI Document 4412/CERT/004
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50542 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PURNELL ELLIOTT WILLIAMS, also known as Pernell Elliott Williams , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 237

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Purnell Elliott Williams appeals his conviction, fo llowing a jury trial, for possessing a firearm following a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. In his sole appellate argument, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) because the Government failed to prove the requisite domestic relationship between him and the victim of his 2010 Texas assault. Although proof of a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50542 Document: 00514374129 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2018No. 17

- 50542

2 domestic relationship is necessary for the federal firearm conviction, the underlying misdemeanor offense need not have a domestic relationship as an
element. United States v. Hayes , 555 U.S. 415, 418, 421

- 29 (2009). The record contains sufficient evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude
th at Ronnessa Williams, the assault victim, was Williams’s wife at the time of
the incident. See United States v. Mitchell , 484 F.3d 762, 768 (5th Cir. 2007); 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-50542 Document: 00514374129 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                       741
<INVENTORY>                                      4,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,228
<PP&E>                                           2,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,405
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,318
<SALES>                                          6,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,821
<CGS>                                            3,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     44
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Order entered December 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00476-CR

JIMMY JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-15371-R

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s November 30, 2020 second motion for an 

extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s 

brief due by December 29, 2020.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
No. 86-6150.

#### Popescu *v.*New Jersey.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Evaluation Team Uses Non-destructive Testing on JBER Airfields 

By Airman 1st Class Crystal A. JenkinsJBER Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Harry V. Pettit, IV, Appellant, v Seneca Wire & Manufacturing Company et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 1022]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Nicholson, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 11.1

                             MECON INC.
       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                            September 30,                   September 30,
                                                         -------------------              -----------------
                                                           1995        1996               1995       1996
                                                           ----         ----              ----       ----
<S>                                                     <C>            <C>               <C>        <C>
Weighted average shares of common stock                   3,329         5,916              3,408      5,906
Cashless exercise of warrants                                57             0                 57          0
Conversion of Series C preferred stock                      480             0                480          0
Dilutive effect of options outstanding                        0           450                  0        469
Options subject to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83         315             0                315          0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares used in per share calculation                      4,181         6,366              4,260      6,375
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders    $ (133)       $  746             $ (933)    $1,059

Earnings per share                                       $(0.03)       $ 0.12             $(0.22)    $ 0.17

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| Dated: August 13, 2002  | /s/  MARK J. LEVIN                       |   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                                                    |   |
|                         | Mark J. Levin                                      |   |
|                         | Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer            |   |
|                         | (Principal executive officer)                      |   |
|                         |                                               |   |
|                         |                                               |   |
| Dated: August 13, 2002  | /s/  KEVIN P. STARR                      |   |
|                         |                                                    |   |
|                         | Kevin P. Starr                                     |   |
|                         | Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer |   |
|                         | (Principal financial officer)                      |   |
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of G/O Business Solutions, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Brian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.    Date:April 16, 2010By:/s/Brian E. RodriguezBrian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer, and Director
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Resin Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Schaefer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Robert SchaeferRobert Schaefer
Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                              PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elwood H.
Spedden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard
Okumoto, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
         32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
         the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the
         Company for the periods covered by the Report.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

/s/ ELWOOD H. SPEDDEN                      /s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO
---------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
Elwood H. Spedden                          Richard Okumoto
President and Chief Executive Officer      Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Photon Dynamics and will be retained by Photon Dynamics and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       42
No. 86-1031.

#### Ewing et al. *v.*Lindley, Tax Commissioner of Ohio.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable Robert M. Summers 

Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment 

1800 Washington Boulevard 

Baltimore, Maryland 21230 

Dear Secretary Summers: 

JAN 0 2 2013 

On December 31,2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision was submitted to 

address infrastructure elements (A)-(M) of Section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which 

are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) in Mmyland. EPA has determined that the submittal is complete for these 

elements. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, 

Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191. 

Sincerely, 

Diana 

l~ClEsher, Director ~ 

Air Protection Division 

cc: George (Tad) S. Abum, Jr., Director, Air And Radiation Management Administration 

Diana Franks, Manager, Air Quality Planning Program 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. Under Contract No. NOOO 19-05-D-0008 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ASBCA No. 60746 ) ) Karen L. Manos, Esq. Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Robert L. Duecaster, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthis appeal having been settled, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 23 May 2017

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60746, Appeal ofL-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Robert Wilson, Respondent, v New York Power Authority, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1003]

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for an order directing plaintiff to submit to a psychological examination *(see,*CPLR 3121 [a]). Plaintiff has not sought damages for psychological injury or otherwise placed his mental condition in controversy *(see, Zimmer v Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. Paul,*204 AD2d 538; *cf., LaBossiere v Hudson,*187 AD2d 411; *Starling v Warshowski,*148 AD2d 441). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K/A of Transmeridian Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Earl W. McNiel, Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: April 20, 2005 |   |                                        |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                        |
|                      |   |                                        |
|                      | By:    | /s/ Earl W. McNiel                          |   |
|                      |   | Earl W. McNiel                              |
|                      |   | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
----

----

| 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 28, 2008 |   |                                                                                                                                    |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | By:    | /s/      Jenifer      Osterwalder                  |
|                      |   | Jenifer      Osterwalder                                                                                                                |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                            |

----
No. D-584.

#### In re Disbarment of Fawell.

[For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 927.]

Disbarment entered.
#### In the Matter of Lester I. Crandall, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York *856State Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 1008]

Proceeding unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see, Matter of Rampino v Irvin,*207 AD2d 1025). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILNER SALOMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2499

[March 4, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562009CF004066A.

Wilner Salomon, Cross City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.