FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 4, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 8- 16 18 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 00 00 8- CR-6 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us KELVIN MAURICE BEASLEY, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Jun e 4 , 20 09 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, BLACK andBARKETT, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: The di stric t co urt s en te nc edKelv in Mauric e Bea sl ey to pri so n fo r a t erm

of 21 8 m on th s o n apl ea o f gu il ty, m ad e p ur su an t t o apl ea ag reem en t, t o o ne co un t o f co ns pi racy to p os se ss with i nt en t t o d is tri bu te fiv e g ram s o r m or e o f cra ckco cai ne an d c oc ai ne hydro ch lo rid e invi ol at io n o f 21 U.S.C. §§ 84 1( a). See 21 U.S.C. §84 6. He ap pe al s t he sen te nc e, arg ui ng th atitis (1) pro cedur al ly unr eas on ab le

be cau se th e d is tri ctco urt fa il edto co ns id er h is m in orrol e inth e o ffen se an d im pe rm is si bl y

to okin to acco un t a g un an d b od y arm orfou ndat h is ho m e, an d (2 ) subs ta nt iv el y

un reas on ab le be cau se hi s ro le in th e cri m e was les s t han t ha t o f hi s co -co ns pi rat or . 1 Ourreas on ab le ne ss rev ie ws co ns is t o f two st ep s. Un it edSta te s v . Pug h, 5 15 F.3 d 1 17 9, 1 19 0 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 8) . Firs t, we d et erm in e whe th er the di st ric t co urt co m m it te d asi gn ifi can t p ro cedur al erro r, su ch as f ai li ng to cal cu la te (orim

pr op erl y cal cu la ti ng ) th e Gui de li ne s s en te nc e ran ge , tre at in g the Gui de li ne s as m an da to ry , fai li ng to co ns id er the sen te nc in g fa ct or s o f 18 U.S.C. § 3 55 3( a), s el ect in g a se nt en ce b as edoncle arl y erro ne ou s fa ct s, o r fai li ng to ad equa te ly exp la in th e ch os ensen te nc e, in cl ud in g a n e xp la na ti on foran y de vi at io n fr om

th e Gui de li ne s se nt en ce rang e. Id . (qu ot in g Gal l v . Uni te d S ta te s, 5 52 U.S. ----, 1 28 S.Ct . 58 6, 59 7, 1 69 L.Ed.2d44 5 (2 00 7) ). Seco nd , if the di stric t co urt d idno t co m m ita pr oc edur al erro r, we co ns id er th e “ subs tant iv e rea so nabl en es s o f th e se nt en ce i m po se d und er an ab us e-o f-d is cret io n s ta nd ard ,” ba se d o n t he “ to ta li ty of th e ci rcu m st an ces .” Id . Be asley does not expressly

argue in his brief tha

t his sentence w as ca lculated 1 improperly

or that he w as improperly denied a minor or minimal role reduc tion. Accordingly , we deem a ny claim in this respec t to be waived. United States v. J ernig an, 341 F .3d 1273, 1283 n. 8 (11th Cir. 2003). 2(quo ti ng Gall , 55 2 U.S. at—, 1 28 S.Ct . at 5 97 ). W e “ m ay fin d tha t a d is tri ctco urt ha s ab us edit s co ns id erab le di sc ret io n i f itha s wei gh edth e fac to rs in a m an ne r th at de m on st rab ly yie ld s an un reas on ab le sen te nc e.” Pu gh , 51 5 F .3dat 1 19 1. In ot he r wor ds , if the di st ric t co urt m ad e a cl ear e rro r injud gm en t i n wei gh in g t he se nt en ci ng fact or s, we re m an d t he cas e fo r res en te nc in g. Id . W hi le a se nt en ce withi n t he Gui de li ne s s en te nc e ran ge is no t en ti tl edto a pr es um pt io n o f reas on ab le ne ss , we "o rd in ari ly w ou ldex pe cta se nt en ce wi th inth e Gui de li ne s ran ge to be reas on ab le ." Uni te d S ta te s v . Tall ey , 43 1 F .3d78 4, 7 88 (11 th Cir . 20 05 ). The di stric t co urt d idno t ab us e it s d is cret io n i n i m po si ng th e se nt en ce i n t hi s cas e. It c orrect ly app li edth e se nt en ci ng pro cedur es an d d idno t co ns id er an y im pe rm is si bl e fac to rs . Furt he r, itga ve du e co ns id erat io n t o t he ch arac te ris ti cs of th e o ffen se an d t he de fen da nt ’s st atus as acare er o ffen de r an d thu s i m po se d a subs ta nt iv el y

reas on ab le sen te nc e. AFFIR MED.

3