alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to
my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.

STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY

By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)



|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                                                           
|---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  |    
|                 |  |  | 
|February 6, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    RICHARD F.
AMBURY
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Richard F. Ambury Chief Financial Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25443]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

SES Performance Review Board; Appointment of Members

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the 
Performance Review Board of the Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa M. Williams, Chief Human Capital 
Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the Performance Review Board 
(PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews 
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance 
by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with 
respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments and performance 
awards.
    The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to 
serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, 
which begins on October 22, 2012.

PRB Chair

    Mr. Reuben Daniels, Director, Charlotte District Office, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission.

Members

    Mr. Kevin J. Berry, Director, New York District Office, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission;
    Ms. Katherine E. Bissell, Deputy Solicitor for Regional 
Enforcement, Department of Labor;
    Ms. Kathryn A. Ellis, Assistant General Counsel, Division of 
Educational Equity and Research, and Agency Dispute Resolution 
Specialist, Department of Education;
    Mr. James L. Lee, Deputy General Counsel, Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission;
    Mr. Webster N. Smith, Director, Indianapolis District Office, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission.

Alternate

    Mr. Dexter R. Brooks, Director, Federal Sector Programs, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission.

    Dated: October 11, 2012.

    By the direction of the Commission.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2012-25443 Filed 10-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
No: I-19-002 January 8, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

NRC to Hold Public Meeting for Comments

on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Activities Report

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Jan. 15 in Plymouth, 

Mass., to discuss a decommissioning roadmap report for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant. Attendees 

will be able to provide comments at the meeting.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m., at Hotel 1620, located at 180 Water St., in 

Plymouth.

Entergy, which owns the single-reactor Plymouth facility, submitted its Pilgrim Post-Shutdown 

Decommissioning Activities Report to the NRC on Nov. 16. Among other details, it describes the 

company’s plans to put the plant into SAFSTOR, or long-term storage, prior to beginning 

dismantlement work.

Holtec, which plans to acquire Pilgrim and decommission it in an expedited manner, has 

submitted its own PSDAR for the plant. Since an application to transfer the plant’s NRC license from 

Entergy to Holtec remains under review, the report is currently being handled as a supplement to the 

application.

Public comments on the Pilgrim PSDAR will be taken until March 21. A Federal Register

notice provides information on how to submit comments in writing.

Pilgrim is scheduled to permanently cease operations by June 1, 2019.
#### In re D. Lee DE SHONG, Debtor. BANK OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. D. Lee DE SHONG and Patrick Scanlon, Trustee, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 80-355.

Adv. No. 80-87.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

Sept. 22, 1981.

Eric M. Doroshow, Wilmington, Del., for debtor.

*180Patrick Scanlon, Dover, Del., trustee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BALICK, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment. The parties have stipulated to the following facts: On October 1, 1980 the debtor executed a contract to purchase a 1978 Mustang from Van Chevrolet; the contract was assigned to Bank of Delaware; the debtor filed his petition in bankruptcy on October 7, 1980; the Bank perfected its lien on October 30,1980; and the lien can be avoided by the trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) (the preference section). The record reflects the additional fact that the debtor filed an amended Schedule B-4 to claim as exempt property under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(1) and (5) a 1978 Mustang valued at $4,050.

The only issue presently before the court is “who gets the vehicle — debtor or trustee?” The pertinent sections of the Code are 522(b), (d) and (g), 541, 544, 547 and 551.

The commencement of a bankruptcy case creates an estate composed of all property of the debtor (§ 541). From this estate, a debtor is permitted under § 522(b) to exempt certain property. This debtor had the choice of selecting the federal or the state exemptions and selected the federal exemptions of § 522(d). Subsections (1) and (5) provide that only the value of debtor’s interest may be exempted.

By virtue of § 544 the trustee takes property before an unperfected secured party. The Bank failed to perfect its security interest before debtor filed his bankruptcy petition and has further agreed that its subsequent perfection is avoidable by the trustee under § 547. Section 551 provides for an automatic preservation of an avoided transfer. So, the security interest given by the debtor to the Bank has been retained for the benefit of the estate.

Under § 522(g)(1) and (2) a debtor is entitled to exempt property recovered by a trustee under § 551 only if certain conditions are met. The debtor cannot meet either of those conditions. First, his purchase of the automobile and the giving of the security interest was a voluntary transfer. Second, he cannot avoid under 522(f)(2) a purchase-money security interest in an automobile.

Thus, the trustee is entitled to the 1978 Mustang subject to the debtor’s equity, if any.
Exhibit 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas M. Finn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Speedus Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:    May 14, 2004

By:      /s/ Thomas M. Finn
         ----------------------
Name:    Thomas M. Finn
Title:   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       18
Exhibit 32


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                           HORIZON FINANCIAL CORP.
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Horizon Financial Corp. (the "Company") and in connection with this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A ("Report"), that:

      1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
           and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
           operations, as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
           financial statements included in the Report.



/s/ Richard P. Jacobson                  /s/ Greg B. Spear
-----------------------------            ----------------------------
Richard P. Jacobson                      Greg B. Spear
Chief Executive Officer                  Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  August 10, 2009


<PAGE>
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1512 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the reissuance of Social Security account numbers 

to young children in cases where confidentiality has been 

compromised. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1512 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Child 

3 Protection Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUM5 BERS TO YOUNG CHILDREN IN CASES WHERE 

6 CONFIDENTIALITY HAS BEEN COMPROMISED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social 

8 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(B)) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); 

10 and 

11 (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following 

12 new clause: 

13 ‘‘(iii) In any case in which a Social Security account 

14 number has been issued to a child who has not attained 

15 the age of 14 pursuant to subclause (IV) or (V) of clause 

16 (i) and it is demonstrated by evidence, as determined by 

17 the Commissioner of Social Security, and submitted under 

18 penalty of perjury to the Commissioner by a parent or 

19 guardian of the child that in the course of transmission 

20 of the social security card to the child, the confidentiality 

21 of such number has been compromised by reason of theft 

22 of such social security card, the Commissioner shall issue 

23 a new Social Security account number to such child and 

24 make note in the records maintained with respect to such 

25 child of the pertinent information received by the Commis26 sioner regarding the theft of the social security card.’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1512 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 180 

3 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Bryce Marine, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v Rinker Boat Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[633 NYS2d 1021]

Appeal unanimously dismissed *(see, Matter of Laborers Intl. Union v Shevlin-Manning, Inc.,*147 AD2d 977) and cross appeal dismissed without costs *(see, Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*45 NY2d 482, 488; *Matter of Brown v Starkweather,*197 AD2d 840, 841, *lv denied*82 NY2d 653). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — Permanent Injunction.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Argued November 19,

reversed and remanded November 26, 1973

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DAVID J. STERLING (No. 14-823), *Appellant.*

516 P2d 86

*Robert G. Cannon,*Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With, him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

*Thomas H. Denney,*Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded. *See, State v. Wardius,*6 Or App 391, 487 P2d 1380, Sup Ct *review denied*(1971), *reversed cmd remanded*412 US 470, 93 S Ct 2208, 37 L Ed 2d 82 (1973), decided by the United States Supreme Court after the trial of this case.
No. 82-1239.

#### Deneen *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Yongqi Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of Claremont Technologies Corp. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: December 30, 2006 /s/ Yongqi Zhu Name: Yongqi Zhu Title: Chief Executive Officer
LADON M. GREEN

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THER EOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 581

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 25, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

.
Ladon M. Green, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, and Kenneth S. Steely, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL
, RAY

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 85204 

FILE 

SEP 09 2022 

LEIDIANNE L. BAUTISTA; AND 

CONSTANTINE S. NACAR, 

Appellants, 

VS. 

NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, 

INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION; AND 

SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 10449 

FORKED RUN, A NEVADA LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, 

Res i ondents. 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK a F S 1PREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CLERK 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(0) 1947 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This appeal was docketed on August 23, 2022, without payment 

of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued 

a notice directing appellants to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate 

compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to 

comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants 

have not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. 

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(0(2). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge 

Senior Counsel, LLC 

Brandon E. Wood 

Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STAR GAS
PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE INTERIM PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001002590
<NAME> STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                       358
<INVENTORY>                                      5,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,989
<PP&E>                                         130,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 179,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,514
<BONDS>                                         96,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,485<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                         398<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   179,451
<SALES>                                         40,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,844
<CGS>                                           21,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<FN>
<F1>COMMON STOCK - REPRESENTS LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS WHICH CONSISTS OF COMMON
AND SUBORDINATED UNITS. THESE UNITS ARE CONSIDERED TO POSSESS THE
CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMON STOCK AND ARE BOTH INCLUDED IN THE DETERMINATION OF
EPS.
<F2>OTHER SE - REPRESENTS THE GENERAL PARTNER'S INTEREST IN THE PARTNERSHIP AND
IS CLASSIFIED HERE SINCE IT DOES NOT POSSESS THE RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF
EITHER COMMON OR PREFERRED STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>