3218 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 14 / Thursday, January 22, 2015 / Notices 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

1See Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, 

Consol. Court No. 07–377, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/remands/ (Final Second 

Remand). 

2Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, 

Germany, Japan, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the 

United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of 

Review in Part, 72 FR 58053 (October 12, 2007) 

(AFBs 17). 

3See Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, 

JTEKT Corporation, et al. v. United States, Consol. 

Court No. 07–00377 (CIT September 2, 2009), dated 

December 4, 2009 (Final First Remand). 

4See JTEKT Corp. v. United States, 768 F. Supp. 

2d 1333 (2011). 

5See Final Second Remand. 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total quantity entered by that importer. 

Then, we will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this new shipper 

review. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Pursuant to a refinement in the 

Department’s practice, for entries that 

were not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by Dezhou Kaihang 

for this new shipper review, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide 

rate.11

The final results of this new shipper 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

new shipper review for shipments of the 

subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

merchandise produced by Shandong 

Fengyu Edible Fungus Co., Ltd. and 

exported by Dezhou Kaihang, the cash 

deposit rate will be that established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is zero or de minimis, then 

zero cash deposit will be required); (2) 

for subject merchandise exported by 

Dezhou Kaihang but not produced by 

Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Co. 

Ltd., the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate for the PRC-wide entity; and (3) for 

subject merchandise produced by 

Shandong Fengyu Edible Fungus Co., 

Ltd. but not exported by Dezhou 

Kaihang, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate applicable to the exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these preliminary results in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 14, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

a. Bona Fide Sale Analysis 

b. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

c. Separate Rates 

d. Separate Rate Recipient 

e. Surrogate Country 

V. Fair Value Comparisons 

VI. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis 

VII. Date of Sale 

VIII. U.S. Price 

IX. Normal Value 

X. Factor Valuations 

XI. Currency Conversions 

XII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–01052 Filed 1–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–804] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From 

Japan: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony With the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Notice of Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2005–2006 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 24, 2014, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (CIT or Court) issued final 

judgment in JTEKT Corp. v. United 

States, Consol. Court No. 07–377 (JTEKT 

Corp.), affirming the Department of 

Commerce’s (the Department) final 

results of redetermination pursuant to 

remand.1

Consistent with the decision of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. 

United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 

1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond 

Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(Diamond Sawblades), the Department 

is notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with the Department’s final results of 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from Japan covering 

the period May 1, 2005 through April 

30, 2006, and is amending the final 

results with respect to Aisin Seiki Co., 

Ltd. 

DATES: Effective January 3, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3477. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 12, 2007, the Department 

published AFBs 17.2 Aisin Seiki Co., 

Ltd. (Aisin) and other parties appealed 

AFBs 17 to the CIT and on September 

3, 2009, the CIT granted the 

Department’s request for a voluntary 

remand to examine its calculation of 

constructed export price (CEP) for 

certain U.S. sales made by Aisin. After 

reexamining Aisin’s CEP calculation, 

the Department determined it 

appropriate to recalculate Aisin’s 

dumping margin.3 On May 5, 2011, the 

CIT affirmed, in part, the Department’s 

first remand, which resulted in a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

1.13 percent for Aisin.4 The Court 

remanded issues regarding other 

respondent companies, relating to the 

Department’s use of zeroing and model 

match methodology. In Final Second 

Remand, the Department further 

explained these issues but did not 

recalculate the dumping margins for any 

other respondents in the litigation.5 The 

Court affirmed the Department’s second 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 14 / Thursday, January 22, 2015 / Notices 3219 

6See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan 

and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset 

Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014). 

1See Melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China and Trinidad and Tobago: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigations, 79 FR 73030 

(December 9, 2014). 

2See Letters from Petitioner titled ‘‘Melamine 

From The People’s Republic Of China: Request For 

Postponement Of The Preliminary Determination’’ 

and ‘‘Melamine From Trinidad and Tobago: Request 

For Postponement Of The Preliminary 

Determination,’’ dated January 9, 2015. 

3See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next 

Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative 

Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act 

of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

remand in its entirety on December 24, 

2014, and entered judgment. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 

341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, 

the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 

516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), the Department 

must publish a notice of a court 

decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with 

a Department determination and must 

suspend liquidation of entries pending 

a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

December 24, 2014, judgment affirming 

the Final Second Remand constitutes a 

final decision of that court that is not in 

harmony with AFBs 17. This notice is 

published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, the Department is amending 

AFBs 17 with respect to Aisin’s 

weighted-average dumping margin as 

redetermined in the Final First Remand. 

The revised weighted-average dumping 

margin for the period May 1, 2005, to 

April 30, 2006, for Aisin is 1.13%. 

Accordingly, the Department will 

continue the suspension of liquidation 

of the subject merchandise pending the 

expiration of the period of appeal or, if 

appealed, pending a final and 

conclusive court decision. In the event 

the Court’s ruling is not appealed, or if 

appealed and upheld by the Federal 

Circuit, the Department will instruct 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on 

entries of the subject merchandise 

exported by Aisin using the revised 

assessment rate calculated by the 

Department in the Final First Remand 

and listed above. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because we revoked the antidumping 

duty order on ball bearings and parts 

thereof from Japan effective September 

15, 2011, no cash deposits for estimated 

antidumping duties on future entries of 

subject merchandise will be required.6

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 15, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01053 Filed 1–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–021, C–274–807] 

Melamine From the People’s Republic 

of China and Trinidad and Tobago: 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determinations of Countervailing Duty 

Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

DATES: Effective January 22, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4987. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 2, 2014, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) initiated 

countervailing duty investigations on 

melamine from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) and Trinidad and 

Tobago.1 The current deadline for the 

preliminary determinations of these 

investigations is no later than February 

5, 2015. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), requires 

the Department to issue the preliminary 

determination in a countervailing duty 

investigation within 65 days after the 

date on which the Department initiated 

the investigation. However, section 

703(c)(1)(B) of the Act permits the 

Department to postpone making the 

preliminary determination until no later 

than 130 days after the date on which 

it initiated the investigation if, among 

other reasons, the petitioner makes a 

timely request for a postponement, or 

the Department concludes that the 

parties concerned are cooperating and 

determines that the investigation is 

extraordinarily complicated. On January 

9, 2015, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.205(b)(2), Cornerstone Chemical 

Company (‘‘Petitioner’’) made timely 

requests to postpone the preliminary 

countervailing duty determinations.2

Therefore, in accordance with section 

703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is hereby postponing the preliminary 

countervailing duty determinations by 

65 days to no later than April 11, 2015. 

However, because April 11, 2015, falls 

on a Saturday, the preliminary 

determinations are now due no later 

than April 13, 2015.3

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: January 15, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01050 Filed 1–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Renewable Energy and Energy 

Efficiency Business Directory Survey 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Opportunity to participate in 

business directory app. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Departments of 

State, Commerce, and Energy (the 

‘‘Interagency Team’’) announce an 

opportunity for U.S.-based suppliers 

and providers of clean energy, smart 

grid, and energy efficiency solutions to 

participate in the pilot phase of an 

interactive directory of renewable 

energy and energy efficiency solutions. 

The Interagency Team is currently 

developing an interactive app to serve 

as a mobile business directory for U.S. 

clean energy exporters. The app will 

highlight sustainability improvements at 

U.S. diplomatic missions and provide 

potential business partners globally 

with a searchable interface to find 

information on potential U.S. 

technology and service providers. The 

app will showcase a diverse array of 

clean energy goods and services, 

including renewable energy equipment 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES