alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 163 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 163

 To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
 Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in 
                        Federal or State court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. Hastings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the provisions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
 Act prohibiting the bringing of qualified civil liability actions in 
                        Federal or State court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Manufacturers Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON BRINGING QUALIFIED CIVIL LIABILITY 
              ACTIONS IN FEDERAL OR STATE COURT.

    Sections 2 through 4 of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms 
Act (15 U.S.C. 7901-7903; Public Law 109-92) are hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 27, 1998 AND JUNE 28, 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     THREE MONTHS      THREE MONTHS       SIX MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                        ENDED             ENDED             ENDED             ENDED
                                                    JUNE 27, 1998     JUNE 28, 1997     JUNE 27, 1998     JUNE 28, 1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>       
Net income .........................................   $2,643,135       $2,033,461       $4,087,695       $3,212,754
                                                       ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
                                                       
Common and common equivalent shares:                   
      Weighted average number of                       
      common shares outstanding                        
      during the period ............................    5,855,207        5,676,862        5,816,867        5,654,543
                                                       
      Common shares issuable upon exercise             
          of outstanding stock options                 
               Diluted .............................      152,387          265,583          165,312          303,304
                                                       
      Common and common equivalent shares              
          outstanding during the period                
               Diluted .............................    6,007,594        5,942,445        5,982,179        5,957,847
                                                       ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
                                                       
Earnings per share data                                
      Net income per common and common                 
          equivalent shares                            
               Basic ...............................      $  0.45          $  0.36          $  0.70          $  0.57
               Diluted .............................      $  0.44          $  0.34          $  0.68          $  0.54
</TABLE>
                                                    



                                       19
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**
I, Charles Boynton, certify that: 
- I have reviewed this Amendment No. 4 to the annual report on Form 10-K ofCommerce One, Inc.;
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: June 9, 2004

/s/ Charles Boynton
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,217
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,141
<PP&E>                                         324,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,435
<BONDS>                                        207,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,963
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    772
<INCOME-TAX>                                       301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS West Virginia Sailor Accounted For From World War II (Garcia, C.)

DoD Release

WASHINGTON -- The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that Navy Shipfitter 2nd Class Claude R. Garcia, 25, killed during World War II, was accounted for on May 12, 2022.On Dec. 7, 1941, Garcia was assigned to the battleship USS West Virginia, which was moored at Ford Island, Pearl Harbor, when the ship was attacked by Japanese aircraft.The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced today that Navy Shipfitter 2nd Class Claude R. Garcia, 25, killed during World War II, was accounted for on May 12, 2022.On Dec. 7, 1941, Garcia was assigned to the battleship USS West Virginia, which was moored at Ford Island, Pearl Harbor, when the ship was attacked by Japanese aircraft. The USS West Virginia sustained multiple torpedo hits, but timely counter-flooding measures taken by the crew prevented it from capsizing, and it came to rest on the shallow harbor floor. The attack on the ship resulted in the deaths of 106 crewmen, including Garcia.For additional information on the Defense Department’s mission to account for Americans who went missing while serving our country, visit the DPAA website at www.dpaa.mil or find us on social media at www.facebook.com/dodpaa or https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-pow-mia-accounting-agency.Garcia’s personnel profile can be viewed at https://dpaa.secure.force.com/dpaaProfile?id=a0Jt000000BbK3DEAV.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-4762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANITA LAVON WILLIAMS, a/k/a Lavon Williams, a/k/a Sylvia 

Hayes, a/k/a Akeen Lewis, a/k/a Betty Davis, a/k/a Stacy 

Meadows, a/k/a Keith Chase, a/k/a April Shoulders, a/k/a 

Beverly Purdue,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00010-CCE-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Sandra J. 

Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anita Lavon Williams pled guilty to one count of mail 

fraud, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341 (West Supp. 2011), and was sentenced 

to an above-Guidelines term of fifty-four months imprisonment. 

Williams appeals her sentence, arguing that it was unreasonably 

high and an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

Williams had fifteen criminal history points, which 

placed her in criminal history category VI. Her advisory 

Guidelines range was 37-46 months. The district court 

characterized its decision to sentence Williams above the 

Guidelines range as both a departure pursuant to U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual § 4A1.3, p.s. (2010), and a variance pursuant 

to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006). The court considered Williams’ 

long record of fraud offenses, including ten worthless check 

convictions which were not counted in her criminal history 

score, see USSG § 4A1.3 cmt. n.8, and the fact that she 

attempted to extort money from the victim after her arrest. The 

district court decided that a one-level departure was 

insufficient and a two-level departure was necessary to achieve 

a sentence that took into account Williams’ past criminal 

conduct, reflected the seriousness of the offense, promoted 

respect for the law, and served to protect the public. 

We review a sentence, including a sentence outside the 

Guidelines range, for procedural and substantive reasonableness. 
3

United States v. Gall, 552 U.S. 38, 46, 51 (2007); United 

States v. Diosdado-Star, 630 F.3d 359, 363 (4th Cir.), cert. 

denied, 131 S. Ct. 2946 (2011). Here, after review of the 

record, we conclude that the sentence was both procedurally and 

substantively reasonable. The court had a reasoned basis for 

its decision to impose a sentence above the Guidelines range and 

made an individualized statement explaining its decision.

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Issue Date: 01/01/84 - 1 - 61728

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DQASIP

INSPECTION PROCEDURE 61728

INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT OF RCS LEAK RATES FOR A PWR

PROGRAM APPLICABILITY: 2515

61728-01 INSPECTION OBJECTIVES

01.01 Independently verify that the reactor cooling system (RCS)

leak rates for a PWR are within the limiting conditions for

operation (LCOs).

01.02 Verify that the licensee's calculational technique for

determining RCS leaks rates is adequate.

61728-02 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS

02.01 Create or update the plant parameter list needed for

independent calculation of identified and unidentified RCS leak

rates for a PWR.

02.02 Run the RCSLK8 option for calculating leak rates.

02.03 Where the intent is to verify the adequacy of the

licensee's calculational technique, compare the results obtained in

Section 02.02, above, to the results of the licensee's analysis when

applied to the same set of data. If the inspector's and the

licensee's identified and unidentified leaks rates differ by more

than 0.2 gpm, determine the cause and take appropriate action.

61728-03 INSPECTION GUIDANCE

03.01 Hardware and software needed to accomplish this inspection are:

a. Osborne 1 portable computer and double density drives,

b. Prowriter printer or equivalent (optional),

c. RCSLK8 PROGRAM diskette.

Before running the program, the inspector should assure that the

plant parameter list is correct. When running the program for the
61728 - 2 - Issue Date: 01/01/84

first time for a specific reactor, the inspector will have to create

a plant parameter list file using the option in RCSLK8 for storing

plant parameters. Values of plant parameters can be corrected by

running the option in RCSLK8 which was written for that purpose.

For additional guidance, see NUREG-0986, "RCSLK8 User's Guide."
Issue Date: 01/01/84 - 3 - 61728

03.02 LCOs in standard technical specifications require that

identified and unidentified leak rates be limited to less than 10

gpm and 1 gpm, respectively. The corresponding surveillance

specification requires (during steady state operation) that these

leak rates be determined at intervals of 72 hours or less by using

the water inventory method. Monitoring and limiting the unidentified leak rate provides assurance that a through-wall crack would

be detected and the reactor would be shut down before the crack

grows to the critical length.

03.03 RCSLK8 can be run:

a. Simultaneously with a test being performed by the licensee,

b. Independently using operating data read from plant instrumentation by the inspector, and

c. Independently using operating data from the licensee's

records.

END
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Calvin L. Kantonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 17th day of May, 2010.








CALVIN KANTONENCalvin L. KantonenChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            121,117
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     2,133,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,254,215
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,254,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,254,215
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,254,215
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
Opinion issued May 2 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 13
- 00400
- CV

——————————— IN RE KATHERINE LOUS IE KING , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Kath erine Louise King, has filed a motion to dismiss her petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus asserted that the trial court had failed to rule on her challenge to its subject

- matter jurisdiction while “entertain[ing] and deci d[ing] substantive matters in the case, despite repeated requests from Relator for a ruling on her amended plea to the jurisdiction.” 1

1 The underlying case is In the Matter of Marriage of Katherine Loui se King and Christopher Michael King and In the Interest of R.A.K., a Child, No. 2011

- 23444,2 Relator states in her motion to dismiss that she has now received a written order from the trial court denying her plea to the jurisdiction. Accordingly, we grant Relator’s motion and dismiss her petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

in the 311th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Deborah Pratt presiding

.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# NRC to Meet with Public on Peach Bottom 1 Decommissioning

----

----

I-98-73

June 23, 1998

**NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC ON PEACH BOTTOM 1 DECOMMISSIONING**

The public is invited to a meeting on Monday evening, June 29, to discuss PECO Energy Company's plans to decommission the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 1, in Delta, Pa.

Peach Bottom 1 was shut down in 1974. It is currently in "safstor" -- a method of decommissioning in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in such a condition that it can be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit release for unrestricted use.

The meeting at the Delta Area Community Senior Center will begin at 7 p.m. The Center is located in the Delta Community Building, 5 Pendyrus Street, Suite 1, in Delta.

The agenda includes a presentation by the NRC staff on the decommissioning process and NRC oversight of that process, and a presentation by PECO on the status of the facility and its plans for decommissioning. There also will be an opportunity for members of the public to ask questions and make comments related to Peach Bottom Unit 1 decommssioning.

A copy of PECO's updated final safety analysis report is available for public inspection at the NRC's local public document room at the Government Publications Section, State Library of Pennsylvania (Regional Depository), in the Education Building (Walnut and Commonwealth Avenue) in Harrisburg.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021