alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Hoverd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

 

Dated: November 9, 2005
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Balaton Power Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: May 31, 2012                                      | 
|------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                        | 
|*/s/ Michael Rosa*                                      | 
|Michael Rosa,
      President & Chief Executive Officer | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                           | 
|                                                        | 
|                                                        | 
|Date: May 31, 2012                                      | 
|                                                        | 
|*/s/ Paul E. Preston*                                   | 
|Paul E. Preston, Chief Financial Officer                | 
|(Principal Financial Officer)                           | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
NO. 07-07-0079-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 23, 2007

______________________________

 ERASMO GONZALES, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAM COUNTY;

NO. 3320-8; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Erasmo Gonzales, appellant, attempts to appeal from an order denying his “‘Petition

for Redress of Grievance’” and his “‘Motion for Nunc Pro Tunc.’” The court signed the

order on December 4, 2006. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal on March 5, 2007. We

dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
2

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day the trial

court enters an appealable order or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial

is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). No motion for new trial having been filed, appellant's

notice of appeal was due to be filed January 3, 2007. Because the record discloses that

appellant’s notice of appeal was received by this court on March 5, 2007, without seeking

an extension of the deadline, TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, the notice of appeal was late.

A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no

action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely

filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
#### Baker and another, Respondents, vs. Voss, Appellant.

*February 4*

March *5, 1935.*

*417The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *H. F. Morson*of Antigo, and for the respondents on that of *V. J. McHale*of Antigo.

Fowler, J.

The nature of the case is stated in the opening sentence of the preceding statement of facts.

The opinions of this court in *Angelo v. Railroad Comm.*194 Wis. 543, 217 N. W. 570, and *Bixby v. Parish,*148 Wis. 421, 134 N. W. 838, leave no doubt that by the law of this state non-meandered and meandered lakes are on the same footing as public waters, and that the title to the bed of every lake that is navigable is in the state. From this it follows that no one may erect a barrier in navigable waters that interferes with such navigation as they are capable of, and injunction lies to enjoin its continuance. *Attorney General ex rel. Becker v. Bay Boom W. R. & F. Co.*172 Wis. 363, 375, 178 N. W. 569. It is also the law of this state that no one may prevent the use of navigable waters by the public for fishing. *Ne-pee-nauk Club v. Wilson,*96 Wis. 290, 71 N. W. 661; *Diana Shooting Club v. Husting,*156 Wis. 261, 145 N. W. 816.

The only question left for consideration is whether the finding of fact by the trial court that the lakes involved are navigable is sustained by the evidence. The facts as to navigability detailed in the statement preceding the opinion are quite similar to those that were held to render waters navigable in the *Ne-pee-nauk Club Case, supra.*The only navigation there existing (see page 291) was by “small craft, like canoes or hunting skiffs, propelled by paddles or push poles.” And a lake is navigable that is a “shallow, muddy lake or marsh,” if boats may be used thereon. *Attorney General ex rel. Becker v. Bay Boom W. R. & F. Co.,*
      *418
      *supra.*So are any natural waters navigable that are usable for rowing or canoeing, and as such are open to the public for fishing or hunting. *Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Railroad Comm.*201 Wis. 40, 228 N. W. 144, 229 N. W. 631.

Much has been said upon the questions involved herein in the opinions in the cases above cited, and in the opinions of this court in the cases cited therein. There is no need to repeat what has been there said, and there is no need to say more. We are of opinion that the evidence supports the finding of navigability made by the trial judge.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the municipal court is affirmed.
Performance Guarantee (Sellers)



 Exhibit 10.1 
 10 January 2011 
  

			
	 Mr Gajendra Kumar Patni

42-A, Jolly Maker Apartments
 Cuff Parade,
Colaba
 Mumbai – 400 005, India
	  	 Mr Ashok Kumar Patni

22-A, Jolly Maker Apartments
 Cuff Parade,
Colaba
 Mumbai – 400 005, India

		
	 Mr Narendra Kumar Patni

2 Avery Street, Unit 34-C
 Boston MA,
02111
 United States of America
	  	

  

	1.	We refer to the Share Purchase Agreement dated 10 January 2011 (including any amendment thereof) (“Founders’ SPA”) entered into among the Pan
– Asia iGATE Solutions, a company existing under the laws of Mauritius (“iGATE Mauritius”), iGATE Global Solutions Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of India (“iGATE India”), Mr. Ashok Kumar
Patni, Mr. Gajendra Kumar Patni, Mr. Narendra Kumar Patni, and persons listed in Schedule 3 thereof (together, “Sellers”). 

  

	2.	iGATE Mauritius and iGATE India (“Subsidiaries”) are subsidiaries of iGATE Corporation (“We”, which expression shall include iGATE
Corporation’s successors and permitted assigns). In consideration of the Sellers entering into the Founders’ SPA with the Subsidiaries, We hereby irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee, without any recourse or reference to any person
(including the Subsidiaries), to the Sellers the performance by the Subsidiaries of their respective obligations under the Founders’ SPA. 

  

	3.	This letter shall be effective from the date hereof, and shall continue and shall remain in full force until the earlier of: (a) Completion and
(b) termination of the Founders’ SPA in accordance with its terms, save and except to the extent of any surviving provisions in respect of which this letter shall terminate when such surviving provisions terminate.


  

	4.	This letter shall be governed by the laws of India. 

  

	5.	Capitalised terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as ascribed to such terms in the Founders SPA and Clause 1.2 (Interpretation), Clause 13
(Governing Law, Disputes and Submission to Jurisdiction) and Clause 14 (Miscellaneous) of the Founders’ SPA shall apply mutatis mutandis to this letter. 


For and on behalf of iGATE Corporation 
  

	
	 /s/ Sujit Sircar

	Name: Sujit Sircar
	Title: Chief Financial Officer


  
 1 | 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             764 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,378 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,420 
<INVENTORY>                                      3,365 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,772 
<PP&E>                                          15,889 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,195 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,627 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,532 
<BONDS>                                         10,856 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                      4,025 
<COMMON>                                           147 
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,179 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,627 
<SALES>                                         11,299 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,378 
<CGS>                                            2,854 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,637 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,780 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,027 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (805)
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.35)
<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported at -0- herein.

* Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
doubtful account in the Statement of Financial Position.
</FN>
                                               


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHARLES W. COOK, III,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D20-741

LT Case No. 2014-CF-000195

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 30, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for St. Johns County,

Howard M. Maltz, Judge.

Charles W. Cook, III, Blountstown, 

pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Holds Change of Command Ceremony

By U.S. Pacific Command

**CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii -- **

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

868 

KA 11-00188 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

LESTER P. IRVING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (PATRICK J. MARTHAGE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M.

Donalty, J.), rendered December 2, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated criminal contempt and

assault in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-02-1997
<CASH>                                          15,322
<SECURITIES>                                    29,161
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                       945
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,787
<PP&E>                                           4,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,474
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,052
<SALES>                                         23,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,563
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                       226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
FILED

March 29, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

ROBERT ALLEN FAHEY, )

 )

Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appeal No.

 ) M1999-00500-COA-R3-CV

v. )

 ) Wilson County Circuit Court

FABIEN ELDRIDGE and ) No. 10389

ELDRIDGE AUTO SALES, INC., )

 )

Defendants/Appellants. )

APPEAL FROM THE WILSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

AT LEBANON, TENNESSEE

THE HONORABLE CLARA BYRD, JUDGE

William Edward Farmer, Lebanon, Tennessee, Attorney for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Chantel M. Eldridge and Samuel J. Harris, Cookeville, Tennessee, Attorneys for

Defendants/Appellants.

AFFIRMED

 INMAN, Sr. J.

Concur:

CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.

LILLARD, J.
-2-

I

A jury awarded the plaintiff substantial compensatory and punitive damages for personal

injuries sustained by him during a violent altercation with the defendant Fabien Eldridge, whose

employer, Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc. was also held liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Both defendants appeal, and present various issues for review, none of which we may consider

because the motions for a new trial do not specify the grounds relied upon.

II

The prolix motion of the defendant, Fabien Eldridge, styled “Offers of Proof and Motion for

New Trial”, purports to be a factual history of the case, argumentative in nature, with no grounds for

a new trial specified.

The motion of the defendant corporation is reproduced:

Defendant Eldridge Auto Sales, Inc. hereby submits its motion for a

new trial and joins in Defendant Fabien Eldridge’s Offers of Proof

and Motion for a New Trial and Notice of Filing of Enumerated

Documents in support of said motion and the Motion to Intervene and

Request to File an Amicus Brief on behalf of Morrison Lowe.

DefendantEldridge Auto Sales hereby incorporates thesemotions and

supporting documents into its motion for a new trial as through said

documents were set forth herein in full.

III

Rule 3(e), T. R. A. P. provides that

 “ . . . in all cases tried by a jury no issue presented for review shall be

predicated upon error . . . occurring during the trial . . . unless the

same was specifically stated in a motion for a new trial.”

The trial judge focused the issue by observing that “it [the motion for a new trial] is not
-3-

properly presented to the court. Certainly, it does not have the assignments of error that is required

for a judge to be able to rule.”

We agree with the appellee that the issues presented for review have been waived since they

were not specifically stated in the motion for a new trial, see, Cortez v Alutech, Inc., ACPC., 941

S.W.2d 891, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996), and the plaintiff did not file a post-trial motion for a directed

verdict.

The judgment is affirmed at the cost of the appellants.

____________________________________

INMAN, Sr. J.

CONCUR:

____________________________________

CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.

____________________________________

LILLARD, J.
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.
Joint Application of DELTA AIR LINES, INC., and Docket DOT-OST-2011-0065 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIMITED for Statements of Authorization and Blanket Exemptions (U.S.-China Codesharing)

NOTICE OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC., AND CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIMITED

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: Evelyn D. Sahr Beth A. FitzPatrick ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC 1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 12th Floor Washington D.C. 20006 (202) 659-6622 esahr@eckertseamans.com bfitzpatrick@eckertseamans.com for CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIMITED September 5, 2014 Alexander Van der Bellen, Managing Director, Government Affairs and Associate General Counsel Christopher Walker Regional Director, Regulatory and International Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 1212 New York Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha. vanderbellen@delta. comBEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.
Joint Application of DELTA AIR LINES, INC., and Docket DOT-OST-2011-0065 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIMITED for Statements of Authorization and Blanket Exemptions (U.S.-China Codesharing)

NOTICE OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC., AND CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIMITED

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted in the captioned docket, Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta") and China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited ("China Eastern") (together, the "Joint Applicants") hereby notify the Department that, beginning no earlier than 30 days from the date of this notice, the Joint Applicants plan to add the following codesharing service: • the display of Delta/Delta Connection's designator code on flights operated by
China Eastern between : New York (JFK) — Fuzhou (FOC)Respectfully Submitted,

~ /s/ Evelyn D. Sahr Evelyn D. Sahr Alexander Van der Bellen For CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES For DELTA AIR LINES, INC CORPORATION LIMITED

197469

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice for Delta and China Eastern was served by electronic mail this 5th day of September 2014 on the following:

TO COMPANY E-MAIL Thomas S. Engle U.S. Department of englets@state.gov State John S. Duncan Federal Aviation john.s.duncan@faa.gov Administration Sascha Van der Bellen Delta Airlines Sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com Christopher Walker Chris.walker@delta.com Robert Wirick American Airlines robert.wirick@aa.com Howard Kass Inc. howard.kass@aa.com Dan Weiss United Air Lines, dan.weiss@united.com Steve Morrissey Inc. steve.morrissey@united.com Abby Bried abby.bried united.com Jonathan Hill Hawaiian Airlines jhill@cooley.com Parker Erkmann perkmann cooley.com Kevin Mont omery Polar Air Cargo kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com Russell E. Pommer Atlas Air, Inc. rpommer@atlasair.com Bailey Leopard Federal Express gbleopard@fedex.com Nancy S arks nssparks@fedex.com Anita Mosner Holland 

### & Knight anita.mosner@hklaw.com Jennifer Nowak (United Parcel jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com Service) Frank Avent Airline Info 

# I info@airlineinfo.com

Beth FitzPatrick

tN0197441.1 }