NAIMA / U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Johns Manville International 

Willows Plant 

5916 County Road 49 

Willows, California 95988 

Project No. 10-3990.18 

January 27, 2011 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070
Johns Manville Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 133 Melter located at 

the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) Complex in Willows, California: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol emission 

rates from four exhaust stacks at the Willows Complex. The four exhaust stacks that were 

evaluated for formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol emission rates are as follows: 

• Line 133 Forming and Collection (three stacks) 

• Line 133 Cooling & Curing Oven (one stack) 

Testing was performed with the assistance of Delta Air Quality Services (Delta AQS) of Orange, 

California on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies 

were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Tables I 

and II on the following pages summarize the overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

ii

Table I 

Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 3.9 x 10-2 3.4 x 10-1

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 2.8 x 10-1 2.4 x 100

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 1.5 x 10 0 1.3 x 10+1

Stack 27 October 13 

& 14, 2010 

Total PM2.5 < 1.9 x 10 0

 1.6 x 10+1

Filterable 

Particulate < 6.7 x 10-2 6.7 x 10-1

Antimony < 2.0 x 10-5 2.0 x 10-4

Arsenic 4.8 x 10-1 4.8 x 10-3

Beryllium < 5.0 x 10-6 5.0 x 10-5

Cadmium 2.1 x 10-5 2.1 x 10-4

Chromium 2.7 x 10-5 2.7 x 10-4

Cobalt < 5.0 x 10-6 5.0 x 10-5

Lead < 1.9 x 10-5 1.9 x 10-4

Manganese < 3.8 x 10-5 3.7 x 10-4

Nickel < 2.7 x 10-5 2.7 x 10-4

Stack 27 October 20, 

2010 

Selenium 5.8 x 10-4 5.7 x 10-3

Stack 27 October 13, 

2010 Mercury 3.7 x 10-4 3.3 x 10-3

Stack 27 October 14 

& 15, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 1.2 x 10-5 1.2 x 10-4

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 1.6 x 10-2 1.6 x 10-1

Stack 27 October 14 

& 15, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 1.6 x 10-2 1.6 x 10-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Johns Manville Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

iii

Table II 

Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 6.6 x 10-2 3.5 x 10-1

Methanol 3.3 x 10-3 1.8 x 10 Stack 28 -2 October 11, 

2010 

Phenol < 9.1 x 10-4 5.0 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 5.6 x 10-2 2.8 x 10-1

Methanol 2.2 x 10-3 1.1 x 10-2 Stack 29 October 11, 

2010 

Phenol < 6.8 x 10-4 3.4 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 4.8 x 10-2 2.4 x 10-1

Methanol 3.0 x 10-3 1.5 x 10-2 Stack 30 October 12, 

2010 

Phenol < 1.1 x 10-3 5.8 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 3.1 x 10-1 3.4 x 100

Methanol 2.4 x 10-3 2.6 x 10-2 Stack 31 October 12, 

2010 

Phenol < 3.9 x 10-4 4.2 x 10-3

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Johns Manville Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 3

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 3 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 4 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 4 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 5 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 5 

3.7 HCOH, PHENOL, AND MEOH CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ........................... 5 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 6

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

(Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions) 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Line 133 Curing & Cooling 

Figure 2 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Line 133 Forming & Collection 

Figure 3 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram – Line 133 Melter 

Figure 4 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 8 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 9 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 10 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Production Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack associated with the Line 133 Melter located at 

the Johns Manville International (Johns Manville) Complex in Willows, California: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

In addition, NAIMA retained BTEC to evaluate formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol 

emission rates from four exhaust stacks at the Willows Complex. The four exhaust stacks that 

were evaluated for formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol emission rates are as follows: 

• Line 133 Forming and Collection (three stacks) 

• Line 133 Cooling & Curing Oven (one stack) 

Testing was performed with the assistance of Delta Air Quality Services (Delta AQS) of Orange, 

California on behalf of BTEC. Reference test methods used and test program methodologies 

were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The 

emissions test program was conducted on October 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 20, 2010. The test 

program consisted of triplicate emission tests at each location for each parameter. The field 

sampling portion of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Barry Boulianne BTEC 

Arlene Bell Delta AQS 

Shannon Scrugham Delta AQS 

John Peterson Delta AQS 

Dave McCune Delta AQS 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 

4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

2

2.0 Process Description

The exhaust stacks to be evaluated by this emissions test program are: (1) one exhaust stack 

(Stack 27) associated with the Line 133 Melter Furnace, (2) three exhaust stacks (Stack 28, 29 

and 30) associated with the Line 133 Curing and Cooling process and (3) one exhaust stack 

(Stack 31) associated with the Line 133 Forming and Collection process. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, Line 133 was operated under normal conditions. Process 

production data is available in Appendix B. Other process and control equipment data will be 

available to U.S. EPA on request. 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

3

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into 

seven categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates; 

(7) Measurement of exhaust gas formaldehyde, methanol, and phenol concentrations and 

emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.7, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figures 1-3 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube 

with a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used 

to measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing a evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

4

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 4. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined gravimetrically. 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system 

consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a PM2.5 particle 

sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a glass 

recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of sample 

line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of HPLC 

water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 5. The total filterable PM faction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system 

consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a heated 

quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a 

Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to 

each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid (HNO3)/10% 

hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals sampling train 

is provided as Figure 6. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using a Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon tubing, (4) 

three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty as a water 

knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica gel 

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 7. 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

5

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe 

liner, (3) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (4) five GS impingers, (5) a length of sample 

line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a calibrated 

orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two 

were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling 

train is provided as Figure 8. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 9 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 

3.7 HCOH, Phenol, and MeOH Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were conducted 

using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 316 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM98.01. HCOH, phenol, and MeOH concentrations and emission rates were be measured using 

Metco’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted 

of (1) a steel nozzle, (2) a heated probe with a glass probe liner, (3) four GS impingers, (4) a 

length of sample line, and (5) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first three impingers were filled with high purity water,

and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic 

drawing of the Method 316 sampling train is provided as Figure 10. 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

6

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Tables 2 and 3. 

Table 2 

Line 133 Melter Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 < 3.9 x 10-2 3.4 x 10-1

Organic 

Condensible PM2.5

 2.8 x 10-1 2.4 x 100

Inorganic 

Condensible PM2.5

 1.5 x 10 0 1.3 x 10+1

Stack 27 October 13 

& 14, 2010 

Total PM2.5 < 1.9 x 10 0

 1.6 x 10+1

Filterable 

Particulate < 6.7 x 10-2 6.7 x 10-1

Antimony < 2.0 x 10-5 2.0 x 10-4

Arsenic 4.8 x 10-1 4.8 x 10-3

Beryllium < 5.0 x 10-6 5.0 x 10-5

Cadmium 2.1 x 10-5 2.1 x 10-4

Chromium 2.7 x 10-5 2.7 x 10-4

Cobalt < 5.0 x 10-6 5.0 x 10-5

Lead < 1.9 x 10-5 1.9 x 10-4

Manganese < 3.8 x 10-5 3.7 x 10-4

Nickel < 2.7 x 10-5 2.7 x 10-4

Stack 27 October 20, 

2010 

Selenium 5.8 x 10-4 5.7 x 10-3

Stack 27 October 13, 

2010 Mercury 3.7 x 10-4 3.3 x 10-3

Stack 27 October 14 

& 15, 2010 

Hexavalent 

Chromium < 1.2 x 10-5 1.2 x 10-4

Hydrogen 

Chloride < 1.6 x 10-2 1.6 x 10-1

Stack 27 October 14 

& 15, 2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 1.6 x 10-2 1.6 x 10-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the 

method detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or 

more of the sample fractions. 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

7

Table 3 

Line 133 EPA Method 316 Emissions Test Program Results Summary 

Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol Emissions 

Source Test 

Date(s) Pollutant MDL used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Formaldehyde 6.6 x 10-2 3.5 x 10-1

Methanol 3.3 x 10-3 1.8 x 10 Stack 28 -2 October 11, 

2010 

Phenol < 9.1 x 10-4 5.0 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 5.6 x 10-2 2.8 x 10-1

Methanol 2.2 x 10-3 1.1 x 10-2 Stack 29 October 11, 

2010 

Phenol < 6.8 x 10-4 3.4 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 4.8 x 10-2 2.4 x 10-1

Methanol 3.0 x 10-3 1.5 x 10-2 Stack 30 October 12, 

2010 

Phenol < 1.1 x 10-3 5.8 x 10-3

Formaldehyde 3.1 x 10-1 3.4 x 100

Methanol 2.4 x 10-3 2.6 x 10-2 Stack 31 October 12, 

2010 

Phenol < 3.9 x 10-4 4.2 x 10-3

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test run are summarized in Appendix A. Process 

production data is included in Appendix B. Field and computer-generated data sheets are 

included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents and Appendix E includes 

laboratory analytical reports. 
Johns Manville, Willows, California BTEC Project No. 10-3990.18 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report January 27, 2011 

8

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Johns Manville International. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without NAIMA’s 

consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent 

performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with 

the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential 

damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

David Center 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
FIGURES 
Stack Dimensions: 60.5" X 60.5"

Points Distance "

1 6.05

2 18.15

3 30.25

4 42.35

5 54.45

Site: Sampling Dates:

Johns Manville October 11 & 12, 2010

Willows, CA

Line 133 Curing & Cooling

Figure No. 1

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

> 1 Diameter

> 2 Diameters
Diameter:

47.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.0

11 3.2

10 5.6

9 8.4

8 11.9

7 16.9

6 30.6

5 35.6

4 39.1

3 41.9

2 44.3

1 46.5

Site:

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133 Forming and Collecting

Figure 2

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Diameter:

58.50 in

Points Distance "

12 1.2

11 3.9

10 6.9

9 10.4

8 14.6

7 20.8

6 37.7

5 43.9

4 48.1

3 51.6

2 54.6

1 57.3

Site:

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133 Forming and Collecting

Figure 3

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

<0.5 diameters

 <2 diameters
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 4

Site:

USEPA Method 3A

Johns Manville

Willows, CA

Line 133

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Site:

USEPA OTM27/28Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133

BT Environmen

2615 

Ferndale

Figure 5

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 6

Site:USEPA Method 29Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133

BT Environmen

2615 

Ferndale

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 7

Site:USEPA Method 30B Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133

BT Environm

26

Ferndale

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 8

Site:USEPA Method 0061Johns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133

BT Environm

26

Fern

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empty

Site:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainJohns ManvilleWillows, CALine 133

BT Environm

2615 Wolcott 

Figure 9

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 100 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
Site:

USEPA Method 316Johns Manville InternationalWillows, CALine 133

BT Environmen

2615 

Ferndale M

Figure 10

100 ml Ultrafiltered H Silica gel 2O

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off -+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
APPENDIX A 

Detailed Test Run Results 
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/13/2010 10/13/2010 10/14/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:30:45 10:30:45 8:10:00

Run Finish Time 14:13:42 14:13:42 11:33:20

Net Traversing Points 12 12 12

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 200.13 200.13 199.64 200

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 29.80 29.80 29.80

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 75.547 75.547 73.269 74.788

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 90.38 90.38 76.50 85.75

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 72.621 72.621 72.253 72.498

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 19 36.8 31.6 29.1

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 0.89 1.73 1.49 1.37

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.2 2.3 2.0 1.9

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.988 0.977 0.980 0.981

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.23 0.23 0.15 0.2

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.6 20.1 20.4

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.17 79.17 79.75 79.4

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.86 28.86 28.83 28.85

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.73 28.61 28.61 28.65

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.63 -0.63 -0.63 -0.63

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.75 29.75 29.75 29.75

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 129 129 120 126

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.278 0.278 0.276 0.278

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 31.3 31.3 31.0 31.2

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 30,618 30,902 30,873 30,798

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 35,156 35,082 34,810 35,016

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 84.8 85.6 84.7 85.0

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 0.90 0.60 0.60 0.70

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 4.4E-01 2.9E-01 2.9E-01 3.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.1E-02 3.3E-02 3.4E-02 3.9E-02

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E+00 2.9E+00 2.0E+00 2.4E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-01 3.3E-01 2.3E-01 2.8E-01

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 31.0 19.0 32.0 27.3

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E+01 9.2E+00 1.6E+01 1.3E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.7E+00 1.1E+00 1.8E+00 1.5E+00

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 36.9 25.6 36.6 33.0

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E+01 1.2E+01 1.8E+01 1.6E+01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.1E+00 1.4E+00 2.1E+00 1.9E+00

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, Ca

Source Stack #27

Personnel JP
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 10/20/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:20:00 10:55:00 14:16:00

Run Finish Time 10:36:00 14:06:00 17:26:00

Net Traversing Points 25 25 25

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 188 188 188 188

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.315 0.313 0.315 0.314

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.65 29.65 29.65 29.65

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.82 1.80 1.80 1.81

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 144.620 143.150 143.500 143.757

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 60.14 80.70 88.57 76.47

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 146.870 139.840 138.170 141.627

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 66.8 85.3 74.8 75.6

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 3.14 4.02 3.52 3.56

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.1 2.8 2.5 2.5

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.979 0.972 0.975 0.975

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.1

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.8 20.83 20.83 20.8

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.06 79.06 79.06 79.1

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.85 28.85 28.85 28.85

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.62 28.55 28.58 28.58

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.61 29.61 29.61 29.61

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 111 120 126 119

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.210 0.212 0.207 0.210

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 27.0 27.4 27.2 27.2

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 26,919 27,147 26,531 26,865

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 30,764 30,283 30,529 30,525

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.5 96.8 95.8 97.4

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 2.2 2.7 3.1 2.7

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.07

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04 2.0E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E-05 2.0E-05 2.0E-05 2.0E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 16.5 19.5 21.2 19.1

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 4.0E-03 4.9E-03 5.4E-03 4.8E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.0E-04 5.0E-04 5.4E-04 4.8E-04

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-06 5.1E-06 5.1E-06 5.0E-06

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.83

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.3E-04 3.6E-04 2.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.4E-05 1.3E-05 3.6E-05 2.1E-05

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.72 0.72 1.83 1.09

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.7E-04 1.8E-04 4.7E-04 2.7E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-05 1.8E-05 4.6E-05 2.7E-05

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-05 5.1E-05 5.1E-05 5.0E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.9E-06 5.1E-06 5.1E-06 5.0E-06

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.4 1.4 0.8

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.1E-04 1.0E-04 3.7E-04 1.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-05 1.0E-05 3.7E-05 1.9E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-04 3.8E-04 3.8E-04 3.7E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.7E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05 3.8E-05

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 2.6E-04 2.5E-04 2.8E-04 2.7E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.7E-05 2.5E-05 2.8E-05 2.7E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 19.5 23.9 25.5 23.0

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 4.7E-03 6.0E-03 6.5E-03 5.7E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.8E-04 6.1E-04 6.5E-04 5.8E-04

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, CA

Source 27

Personnel SS
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDJohns Manville Willows CA California 027 Melter Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data F

BDL

1 10/13/2010 10:20 10/13/2010 12:20 3.61E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 2 10/13/2010 12:46 10/13/2010 14:46 2.99E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 3 10/13/2010 15:04 10/13/2010 17:04 3.19E-03 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B 

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Em

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

 QA/QC Documentation

Process 

Production Rate

(tons glass/hr)

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/ton)

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volum

Differenc

2.2 0.2 20.61 34,795 30,649 131

flow and moisture from OTM27/28 run 1 10:42 - 13:56 R1, A 532 0.1 532.1 0 532.1 0.15 

2.2 0.2 20.61 34,795 30,649 134

flow and moisture from OTM27/28 run 1 10:42 - 13:56 R2, A 436 0.2 436.2 0 436.2 0.15 

2.2 0.2 20.61 34,868 30,368 136

flow and moisture from OTM27/28 run 2 14:39 - 18:00 R3, A 461 0.7 461.7 0 461.7 0.14 

Trap #1

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Concentration 

(μg/dscm) Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C

3.61

R1, B 531.0 0.60 531.60 20 511.6 0.14 6% 0

3.7

0.1 1 

2.99

R2, B 449.0 0.40 449.40 20 429.4 0.15 1% 0

2.9

0.1 1 

3.19

R3, B 449.0 0.40 449.40 20 429.4 0.15 1% 0

2.9

0.3 4 

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) 

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 

μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1 

μg/dscm

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing - 0061

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/14/2010 10/15/2010 10/15/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:18:00 7:58:00 11:49:00

Run Finish Time 15:35:00 11:18:00 15:05:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.283 0.283 0.283 0.283

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 30.00 30.00 29.93

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.20

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 125.695 121.726 123.400 123.607

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 96.76 76.58 96.47 89.94

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 119.687 121.055 118.319 119.687

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 52.12 61.4 77.1 63.5

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.45 2.89 3.63 2.99

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.0 2.3 3.0 2.4

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.980 0.977 0.970 0.976

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.1

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.1 20.16 20.2 20.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.72 79.71 79.71 79.7

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.61 28.57 28.50 28.56

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.76 29.96 29.96 29.89

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 134 120 133 129

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.218 0.209 0.196 0.208

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 27.9 26.9 26.4 27.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 26,931 27,181 25,661 26,591

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 30,235 31,352 29,676 30,421

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 98.3 100.3 102.9 100.5

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 1.2E-05 1.1E-05 1.2E-05

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

JM 10-3990.18

Willows, CA

Source 027 melter

Personnel JP
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing - 26A

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/14/2010 10/15/2010 10/15/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:20:00 8:07:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 14:38:00 10:24:00 12:26:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.282 0.281 0.282 0.282

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.80 30.00 30.00 29.93

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.38 1.23 1.18 1.26

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 49.300 47.180 46.090 47.523

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 91.02 72.23 91.00 84.75

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 46.503 46.366 43.746 45.538

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 22.5 21.1 19.6 21.1

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.06 0.99 0.92 0.99

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.978 0.979 0.979 0.979

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.1

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.13 20.16 20.16 20.2

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.7134 79.7054 79.7054 79.7

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.59 28.60 28.60 28.60

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.6 -0.60 -0.60 -0.60

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.76 29.96 29.96 29.89

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 132 118 127 126

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.225 0.206 0.194 0.208

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 28.4 26.8 26.2 27.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 26,874 27,659 25,912 26,815

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 30,034 31,881 29,386 30,434

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.9 104.2 101.1 102.1

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.6E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 1.6E-02

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 200 200 200 200

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.6E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-02 1.5E-02 1.6E-02 1.6E-02

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

JM 10-3990.18

Willows

Source #27

Personnel SS
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/11/2010 10/11/2010 10/11/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:25:00 13:20:00 16:15:00

Run Finish Time 12:36:00 15:05:00 17:38:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 125

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.71 29.71 29.71 29.71

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.94 0.83 0.80 0.85

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 69.681 66.673 52.585 62.980

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 81.34 88.26 94.02 87.87

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 67.982 64.209 50.111 60.767

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 42.2 38.6 33.2 38.0

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.99 1.82 1.56 1.79

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.9

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.972 0.972 0.970 0.971

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.09

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.24 20.16 20.10 20.17

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.64 79.76 79.83 79.74

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.83 28.82 28.82 28.82

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.52 28.52 28.49 28.51

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.49 -0.50 -0.50

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.67 29.67 29.67 29.67

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 111 115 112 113

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.406 0.382 0.375 0.387

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.3 36.3 35.8 36.5

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 49,049 50,674 48,437 49,386

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 55,335 56,855 54,605 55,599

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.6 102.7 101.4 101.9

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 690 630 510 610

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 3.6E-01 3.5E-01 3.6E-01 3.5E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.8E-02 6.4E-02 6.5E-02 6.6E-02

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 29 27 33 30

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-02 1.5E-02 2.3E-02 1.8E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.9E-03 2.7E-03 4.2E-03 3.3E-03

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 6 12 8

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-03 3.3E-03 8.5E-03 5.0E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.9E-04 6.1E-04 1.5E-03 9.1E-04

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, CA

Stack Stack #28

Personnel JP
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/11/2010 10/11/2010 10/11/2010

Start Run Start Time 10:25:00 13:20:00 16:20:00

Run Finish Time 12:44:00 15:16:00 17:49:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 125 125 125 125

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.218 0.218 0.218 0.218

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.71 29.71 29.71 29.71

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.03

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 71.755 72.815 58.173 67.581

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 83.58 89.56 93.76 88.97

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 68.347 68.604 54.386 63.779

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 45.1 43.6 36 41.6

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.12 2.05 1.69 1.96

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.970 0.971 0.970 0.970

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.08 20.01 20.03 20.04

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.84 79.91 79.90 79.88

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.82 28.81 28.81 28.81

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.49 28.50 28.49 28.49

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.50 -0.50 -0.50

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.67 29.67 29.67 29.67

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 109 113 114 112

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.470 0.462 0.451 0.461

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 40.1 39.9 39.5 39.8

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 54,022 54,556 53,281 53,953

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 60,895 61,127 60,249 60,757

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.0 96.7 100.7 98.8

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 510 540 440 497

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 2.6E-01 2.8E-01 2.9E-01 2.8E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.4E-02 5.6E-02 5.7E-02 5.6E-02

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 19 16 23 19

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 9.8E-03 8.2E-03 1.5E-02 1.1E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.0E-03 1.7E-03 3.0E-03 2.2E-03

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 6 6 6

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 3.1E-03 3.1E-03 3.9E-03 3.4E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.3E-04 6.2E-04 7.8E-04 6.8E-04

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, Ca

Stack Stack #29

Personnel DM
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/11/2010 10/12/2010

Start Run Start Time 9:30:00 11:35:00 14:15:00

Run Finish Time 10:57:00 12:42:00 15:40:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 75 75 75 75

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.245 0.245 0.245 0.245

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.77 29.77 29.77 29.77

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.53 1.25 1.61 1.46

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 51.378 49.200 56.015 52.198

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 78.78 86.10 93.40 86.09

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 49.532 46.764 52.586 49.628

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 31.6 34.1 38.7 34.8

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.49 1.61 1.82 1.64

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.2

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.971 0.967 0.967 0.968

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.94 79.94 79.94 79.94

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.81 28.81 28.81 28.81

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.49 28.45 28.45 28.46

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.67 -0.67 -0.67 -0.67

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.72 29.72 29.72 29.72

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 104 108 108 107

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.466 0.380 0.477 0.441

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 39.5 36.2 40.3 38.7

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 49,281 54,349 54,899 52,843

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 55,225 60,173 61,517 58,972

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 94.7 99.1 99.5 97.7

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 320 350 360 343

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 2.3E-01 2.6E-01 2.4E-01 2.4E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-02 4.9E-02 5.0E-02 4.8E-02

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 19 25 20 21.3

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 1.4E-02 1.9E-02 1.3E-02 1.5E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.8E-03 3.5E-03 2.8E-03 3.0E-03

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6 12 6 8.0

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 4.3E-03 9.1E-03 4.0E-03 5.8E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 8.7E-04 1.7E-03 8.3E-04 1.1E-03

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, CA

Stack Stack #30

Personnel DM
Plant Job #

Location HCOH, MeOH, Phenol Testing

 Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 2 3 4 Average

Date Test Date 10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/12/2010

Start Run Start Time 12:38:00 14:05:00 15:30:00

Run Finish Time 13:51:00 15:06:00 16:31:00

Net Traversing Points 20 20 20

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72 72

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.254 0.251 0.254 0.253

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.77 29.77 29.77 29.77

∆H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.55 1.65 1.61 1.60

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 51.830 52.733 52.435 52.333

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 88.56 92.21 92.06 90.94

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 50.076 50.624 50.347 50.349

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 48.9 48.8 62.7 53.5

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.30 2.30 2.95 2.52

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.4 4.3 5.5 4.8

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.956 0.957 0.945 0.952

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.06 0.39 0.39 0.28

%O2 Oxygen, % 19.57 19.44 19.38 19.46

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.37 80.18 80.23 80.26

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.79 28.84 28.84 28.82

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.32 28.37 28.24 28.31

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.29 -0.20 -0.23 -0.24

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.75 29.76 29.75 29.75

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 130 131 132 131

∆Pavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.410 0.455 0.424 0.430

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 38.5 40.5 39.2 39.4

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 25,420 24,177 24,264 24,620

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 29,896 28,432 28,951 29,093

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 99.2 101.0 100.3

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Formaldehyde Catch Weight, μg 4800 4700 5000 4833

Cmg/dscm Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm 3.4E+00 3.3E+00 3.5E+00 3.4E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Formaldehyde Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.1E-01 3.1E-01 3.2E-01 3.1E-01

Elb/ton product Formaldehyde Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Methanol Catch Weight, μg 36 40 35 37

Cmg/dscm Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm 2.5E-02 2.8E-02 2.5E-02 2.6E-02

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Methanol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.3E-03 2.7E-03 2.2E-03 2.4E-03

Elb/ton product Methanol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Phenol Catch Weight, μg 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Cmg/dscm Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Phenol Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-04 4.0E-04 3.8E-04 3.9E-04

Elb/ton product Phenol Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Johns Manville 10-3990.18

Willows, CA

Stack Stack #31

Personnel JP
APPENDIX B 

Production Data 
APPENDIX C 

Field and ComputerGenerated Data Sheets and 

Notes 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 10:00 10:01 316.95 31

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 16.68 @ 

Source Stack #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.72 Date 10/13/10 Time/reading 16.68

Operator JP Bws (%) 1.22 # of Ports 2 Total Run min 200.13Filter Number 10081630 Condensate Volume 0.5 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18.5 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.63 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.60 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.23 Md 28.86 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.73 Act. Flow (cfm) 35,082 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 72.43 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 31,283

Moisture % 1.22 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 30,902

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 18.8 10:30 317.01 0.35 123 82 80 0.74 0.43 2

2 18.8 37.6 10:49 323.96 0.35 125 85 83 0.74 0.42 23 37.6 55.6 11:08 331.09 0.32 126 85 87 0.68 0.42 24 55.6 72.7 11:26 337.91 0.29 127 88 87 0.61 0.42 25 72.7 88.0 11:43 344.46 0.23 127 87 86 0.49 0.42 26 88.0 102.2 11:58 350.20 0.20 127 87 86 0.42 0.42 21 102.2 119.9 12:35 355.67 0.31 128 89 88 0.66 0.42 22 119.9 138.4 12:53 362.30 0.34 132 93 90 0.72 0.42 23 138.4 155.8 13:11 369.29 0.30 132 97 93 0.64 0.42 24 155.8 172.1 13:29 375.83 0.26 134 100 95 0.55 0.42 25 172.1 185.9 13:45 382.01 0.19 133 102 97 0.40 0.42 26 185.9 200.1 13:59 387.18 0.20 132 104 98 0.42 0.42 2

200.1 14:13 392.56

Average: 75.55 0.28 128.8 91.6 89.2 0.59 0.42 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 14:30 14:31 0.00 

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 16.7

Source Stack #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 10/13/10 Time/reading 16.7 18:01 18:01 0.00 

Operator JP Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 200.1

Filter Number 1008162 Condensate Volume 13.8 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 23 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.63 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.23 Md 28.86 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.61 Act. Flow (cfm) 35,156 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 72.43 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 31,349

Moisture % 2.34 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 30,618

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 18.8 10:30 317.01 0.35 123 82 80 0.73 0.42 2

2 18.8 37.6 10:49 323.96 0.35 125 85 83 0.73 0.42 23 37.6 55.6 11:08 331.09 0.32 126 85 87 0.67 0.42 24 55.6 72.7 11:26 337.91 0.29 127 88 87 0.60 0.42 25 72.7 88.0 11:43 344.46 0.23 127 87 86 0.48 0.42 26 88.0 102.2 11:58 350.20 0.20 127 87 86 0.42 0.42 21 102.2 119.9 12:35 355.67 0.31 128 89 88 0.64 0.42 22 119.9 138.4 12:53 362.30 0.34 132 93 90 0.71 0.42 23 138.4 155.8 13:11 369.29 0.30 132 97 93 0.62 0.42 24 155.8 172.1 13:29 375.83 0.26 134 100 95 0.54 0.42 25 172.1 185.9 13:45 382.01 0.19 133 102 97 0.39 0.42 26 185.9 200.1 13:59 387.18 0.20 132 104 98 0.42 0.42 2

200.1 14:13 392.56

Average: 75.55 0.28 128.8 91.6 89.2 0.58 0.42 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #30 Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 6 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12wcs Method OTM27/28 Total Points 12 8:00 8:01 472.209 47

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 16.6 11:35 11:36 545.528 54

Source Stack #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 10/14/10 Time/reading 16.6

Operator JP Bws (%) 2.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 199.6Filter Number 10010728 Condensate Volume 12.2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 19.4 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.63 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.1 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.15 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.61 Act. Flow (cfm) 34,810 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 72.07 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 31,509

Moisture % 2.02 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 30,873

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 17.7 8:10 472.31 0.31 112 56 54 0.64 0.42 2

2 17.7 36.5 8:27 478.47 0.35 115 61 58 0.72 0.42 23 36.5 55.3 8:46 485.40 0.35 116 63 61 0.72 0.42 24 55.3 72.1 9:05 491.98 0.28 117 70 65 0.58 0.42 25 72.1 87.1 9:22 498.00 0.22 114 75 71 0.45 0.42 26 87.1 102.3 9:37 503.39 0.23 114 81 77 0.48 0.42 21 102.3 119.1 9:56 508.91 0.28 123 85 83 0.58 0.42 22 119.1 136.8 10:12 515.16 0.31 126 89 88 0.64 0.42 23 136.8 153.3 10:30 522.09 0.27 127 88 88 0.56 0.42 24 153.3 170.2 10:47 528.15 0.28 126 87 87 0.58 0.42 25 170.2 184.7 11:03 534.43 0.21 126 88 87 0.43 0.42 26 184.7 199.6 11:18 539.90 0.22 125 87 87 0.45 0.42 2

199.6 11:33 545.58

Average: 73.27 0.28 120.1 77.5 75.5 0.57 0.42 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 29 Total Points 24

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0 7:00 7:01 0.002 @ 10"Source 27 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 20-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0 10:48 10:49 0.002 @ 10"Operator SS Bws (%) 2.10 # of Ports 2 Total Run 188.0Filter Number 83UP-535 Condensate Volume 44 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.61Barometric 29.65 Silica Gel Weight Gain 22.8 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.65 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.315 O2 (%) 20.83 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00054 CO2 (%) 0.11 Md 28.85 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.62 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,283 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 145.99 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 141.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,728

Moisture % 2.11 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 27,147

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 7:20 923.930 0.20 108 50 50 1.77 1.82 250 

1 4.0 8.0 7:24 927.080 0.20 108 50 50 1.77 1.82 250 2 8.0 12.0 7:28 930.200 0.22 109 53 53 1.95 2.01 259 2 12.0 16.0 7:32 933.380 0.22 109 53 53 1.95 2.01 259 3 16.0 20.0 7:36 936.495 0.21 109 59 54 1.86 1.84 250 3 20.0 24.0 7:40 939.590 0.21 109 59 54 1.86 1.84 250 4 24.0 28.0 7:44 942.700 0.21 109 59 54 1.86 1.82 250 4 28.0 32.0 7:48 945.800 0.21 109 59 54 1.86 1.82 250 5 32.0 36.0 7:52 948.910 0.22 109 59 53 1.95 1.9 258 5 36.0 40.0 7:56 952.100 0.22 109 59 53 1.95 1.9 258 6 40.0 44.0 8:00 955.320 0.22 109 59 53 1.95 1.88 258 6 44.0 48.0 8:04 958.440 0.22 109 58 53 1.95 1.88 258 7 48.0 52.0 8:08 961.650 0.22 107 58 53 1.95 1.88 258 7 52.0 56.0 8:12 964.620 0.22 107 60 53 1.95 1.88 258 8 56.0 60.0 8:16 967.670 0.21 107 60 53 1.86 1.79 255 8 60.0 64.0 8:20 970.700 0.21 107 60 53 1.86 1.79 250 9 64.0 68.0 8:24 973.800 0.20 108 60 53 1.77 1.7 250 9 68.0 72.0 8:28 976.780 0.20 108 60 53 1.77 1.7 250 

10 72.0 76.0 8:32 979.790 0.21 108 60 53 1.86 1.78 250 10 76.0 80.0 8:36 982.750 0.21 108 60 53 1.86 1.78 250 11 80.0 84.0 8:40 985.780 0.21 109 58 54 1.86 1.78 252 11 84.0 88.0 8:44 988.850 0.21 109 58 54 1.86 1.78 252 12 88.0 92.0 8:48 991.950 0.20 111 58 54 1.77 1.78 252 12 92.0 96.0 8:52 994.950 0.20 110 58 54 1.77 1.78 252 

1 96.0 100.0 9:04 997.960 0.22 110 58 54 1.95 1.9 252 1 100.0 104.0 9:08 1001.100 0.22 110 58 54 1.95 1.9 252 2 104.0 108.0 9:12 1004.200 0.22 110 59 54 1.95 1.9 250 2 108.0 112.0 9:16 1007.320 0.22 110 59 54 1.95 1.9 250 3 112.0 116.0 9:20 1010.450 0.21 110 66 60 1.86 1.8 255 3 116.0 120.0 9:24 1013.520 0.21 110 66 60 1.86 1.8 255 4 120.0 124.0 9:28 1016.550 0.21 110 66 60 1.86 1.8 255 4 124.0 128.0 9:32 1019.600 0.21 110 66 60 1.86 1.8 255 5 128.0 132.0 9:36 1022.670 0.20 113 67 63 1.77 1.8 259 5 132.0 136.0 9:40 1025.680 0.20 113 67 63 1.77 1.8 259 6 136.0 140.0 9:44 1028.680 0.20 113 67 63 1.77 1.8 259 6 140.0 144.0 9:48 1031.690 0.20 113 67 63 1.77 1.8 259 7 144.0 148.0 9:52 1034.680 0.22 113 68 65 1.95 1.8 253 7 148.0 152.0 9:56 1037.870 0.22 114 68 65 1.95 1.8 253 8 152.0 156.0 10:00 1041.000 0.21 114 68 65 1.86 1.8 253 8 156.0 160.0 10:04 1044.060 0.21 114 68 65 1.86 1.8 253 9 160.0 164.0 10:08 1047.150 0.20 114 72 67 1.77 1.8 250 9 164.0 168.0 10:12 1050.150 0.20 115 72 67 1.77 1.8 250 

10 168.0 172.0 10:16 1053.150 0.21 115 73 68 1.86 1.8 250 10 172.0 176.0 10:20 1056.350 0.21 115 73 68 1.86 1.8 250 11 176.0 180.0 10:24 1059.500 0.20 115 74 68 1.77 1.8 252 11 180.0 184.0 10:28 1062.500 0.20 116 74 68 1.77 1.8 252 12 184.0 188.0 10:32 1065.495 0.20 116 74 68 1.77 1.8 252 

188.0 10:36 1068.550

Average: 144.62 0.21 110.6 62.5 57.8 1.85 1.82 253 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #090 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12wcs Method 29 Total Points 24

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.76 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0 10:48 10:49 0.001 @ 10"

Source 27 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 20-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0 14:08 14:09 0.001 @ 10"

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.8 # of Ports 2 Total Run 188.0Filter Number 83UP-536 Condensate Volume 51.8 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.61Barometric 29.65 Silica Gel Weight Gain 33.5 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.65 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.313 O2 (%) 20.83 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00053 CO2 (%) 0.11 Md 28.85 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.55 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,764 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 139.01 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 142.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,692

Moisture % 2.81 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 26,919

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 10:55 71.800 0.23 116 74 70 2.00 1.8 250 

1 4.0 8.0 10:59 74.990 0.23 116 74 70 2.00 1.8 250 2 8.0 12.0 11:03 78.180 0.22 117 75 73 1.92 1.8 250 2 12.0 16.0 11:07 81.300 0.22 117 75 73 1.92 1.8 250 3 16.0 20.0 11:11 84.380 0.22 117 75 73 1.92 1.8 250 3 20.0 24.0 11:15 87.515 0.22 117 75 73 1.92 1.8 250 4 24.0 28.0 11:19 90.610 0.20 116 75 73 1.74 1.8 260 4 28.0 32.0 11:23 93.690 0.20 116 75 73 1.74 1.8 260 5 32.0 36.0 11:27 96.595 0.22 118 76 74 1.92 1.8 258 5 36.0 40.0 11:31 99.730 0.22 118 76 74 1.92 1.8 258 6 40.0 44.0 11:35 102.850 0.22 118 76 74 1.92 1.8 258 6 44.0 48.0 11:39 105.950 0.22 118 76 74 1.92 1.8 258 7 48.0 52.0 11:43 109.000 0.21 119 77 74 1.83 1.8 255 7 52.0 56.0 11:47 112.000 0.21 119 77 74 1.83 1.8 255 8 56.0 60.0 11:51 115.000 0.21 119 77 74 1.83 1.8 255 8 60.0 64.0 11:55 118.000 0.21 119 77 74 1.83 1.8 255 9 64.0 68.0 11:59 120.995 0.22 120 83 78 1.92 1.8 257 9 68.0 72.0 12:03 124.050 0.22 120 83 78 1.92 1.8 257 

10 72.0 76.0 12:07 127.200 0.22 120 83 78 1.92 1.8 257 10 76.0 80.0 12:11 130.300 0.22 120 83 78 1.92 1.8 257 11 80.0 84.0 12:15 133.460 0.20 120 83 78 1.74 1.8 255 11 84.0 88.0 12:19 134.390 0.20 120 83 78 1.74 1.8 255 12 88.0 92.0 12:23 139.400 0.20 120 83 78 1.74 1.8 255 12 92.0 96.0 12:27 142.395 0.20 120 83 78 1.74 1.8 255 

1 96.0 100.0 12:34 145.400 0.20 120 82 81 1.74 1.8 261 1 100.0 104.0 12:38 148.395 0.20 120 82 81 1.74 1.8 261 2 104.0 108.0 12:42 151.385 0.20 120 82 81 1.74 1.8 261 2 108.0 112.0 12:46 154.375 0.20 120 82 81 1.74 1.8 261 3 112.0 116.0 12:50 157.365 0.22 122 88 84 1.92 1.8 259 3 116.0 120.0 12:54 160.450 0.22 122 88 84 1.92 1.8 259 4 120.0 124.0 12:58 163.450 0.22 122 88 84 1.92 1.8 259 4 124.0 128.0 13:02 166.490 0.22 122 88 84 1.92 1.8 259 5 128.0 132.0 13:06 169.590 0.23 123 86 84 2.00 1.8 257 5 132.0 136.0 13:10 172.750 0.23 123 86 84 2.00 1.8 257 6 136.0 140.0 13:14 175.910 0.23 123 86 84 2.00 1.8 257 6 140.0 144.0 13:18 179.060 0.23 123 86 84 2.00 1.8 257 7 144.0 148.0 13:22 182.220 0.21 123 88 84 1.83 1.8 254 7 148.0 152.0 13:26 185.240 0.21 123 88 84 1.83 1.8 254 8 152.0 156.0 13:30 188.275 0.21 123 88 84 1.83 1.8 254 8 156.0 160.0 13:34 191.300 0.21 123 88 84 1.83 1.8 254 9 160.0 164.0 13:38 194.320 0.20 124 88 84 1.74 1.8 254 9 164.0 168.0 13:42 197.250 0.20 124 88 84 1.74 1.8 254 

10 168.0 172.0 13:46 200.190 0.20 124 88 84 1.74 1.8 254 10 172.0 176.0 13:50 203.120 0.20 124 88 84 1.74 1.8 254 11 176.0 180.0 13:54 206.060 0.20 124 89 85 1.74 1.8 255 11 180.0 184.0 13:58 209.010 0.20 124 89 85 1.74 1.8 255 12 184.0 188.0 14:02 212.950 0.20 124 89 85 1.74 1.8 255 

188.0 14:06 214.950

Average: 143.15 0.21 120.4 82.3 79.1 1.85 1.80 255.9 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant METALS Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12wcs Method 29 Total Points 24 14:15 14:16 0.001 @ 10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.76 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 27 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 20-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator SS Bws (%) 2.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 188.0Filter Number 83UP-537 Condensate Volume 45.3 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.61 17:28 17:29 0.001 @ 10"Barometric 29.65 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29.5 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.65 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.315 O2 (%) 20.83 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00054 CO2 (%) 0.11 Md 28.85 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.58 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,529 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 137.35 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 142.9 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,207

Moisture % 2.50 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 26,531

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 14:16 215.400 0.20 123 87 85 1.80 1.8 257 

1 4.0 8.0 14:20 218.380 0.20 123 87 85 1.80 1.8 257 2 8.0 12.0 14:24 221.360 0.20 123 87 85 1.80 1.8 257 2 12.0 16.0 14:28 224.450 0.20 123 87 85 1.80 1.8 257 3 16.0 20.0 14:32 227.510 0.22 124 88 84 1.98 1.8 254 3 20.0 24.0 14:36 230.640 0.22 124 88 84 1.98 1.8 254 4 24.0 28.0 14:40 233.770 0.22 124 88 84 1.98 1.8 254 4 28.0 32.0 14:44 237.000 0.22 124 88 84 1.98 1.8 254 5 32.0 36.0 14:48 240.135 0.21 124 88 86 1.89 1.8 249 5 36.0 40.0 14:52 243.310 0.21 124 88 86 1.89 1.8 249 6 40.0 44.0 14:56 246.365 0.21 124 88 86 1.89 1.8 249 6 44.0 48.0 15:00 249.410 0.21 125 88 86 1.89 1.8 249 7 48.0 52.0 15:04 252.470 0.20 125 90 89 1.80 1.8 248 7 52.0 56.0 15:08 255.450 0.20 125 90 89 1.80 1.8 248 8 56.0 60.0 15:12 258.410 0.20 125 90 89 1.80 1.8 248 8 60.0 64.0 15:16 261.400 0.20 125 90 89 1.80 1.8 248 9 64.0 68.0 15:20 264.390 0.22 125 92 87 1.98 1.8 248 9 68.0 72.0 15:24 267.530 0.22 125 92 87 1.98 1.8 248 

10 72.0 76.0 15:28 270.650 0.22 125 92 87 1.98 1.8 248 10 76.0 80.0 15:32 273.710 0.22 125 92 87 1.98 1.8 248 11 80.0 84.0 15:36 276.810 0.20 126 94 90 1.80 1.8 256 11 84.0 88.0 15:40 279.800 0.20 126 94 90 1.80 1.8 256 12 88.0 92.0 15:44 282.890 0.20 126 94 90 1.80 1.8 256 12 92.0 96.0 15:48 285.880 0.20 126 94 90 1.81 1.8 256 

1 96.0 100.0 15:54 288.880 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 1 100.0 104.0 15:58 291.870 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 2 104.0 108.0 16:02 294.860 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 2 108.0 112.0 16:06 297.890 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 3 112.0 116.0 16:10 300.890 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 3 116.0 120.0 16:14 304.000 0.20 125 95 90 1.80 1.8 252 4 120.0 124.0 16:18 307.010 0.20 127 97 90 1.80 1.8 254 4 124.0 128.0 16:22 310.000 0.20 127 93 89 1.80 1.8 254 5 128.0 132.0 16:26 313.000 0.20 127 93 89 1.80 1.8 254 5 132.0 136.0 16:30 315.980 0.20 127 93 89 1.80 1.8 254 6 136.0 140.0 16:34 318.980 0.22 129 90 89 1.98 1.8 255 6 140.0 144.0 16:38 322.110 0.22 129 90 88 1.98 1.8 255 7 144.0 148.0 16:42 325.240 0.23 128 89 88 2.07 1.8 255 7 148.0 152.0 16:46 328.430 0.23 128 89 87 2.07 1.8 255 8 152.0 156.0 16:50 331.630 0.21 132 86 87 1.89 1.8 255 8 156.0 160.0 16:54 334.720 0.21 132 86 85 1.89 1.8 255 9 160.0 164.0 16:58 337.820 0.21 132 86 85 1.89 1.8 255 9 164.0 168.0 17:02 341.000 0.21 132 86 85 1.89 1.8 255 

10 168.0 172.0 17:06 344.100 0.20 129 86 85 1.80 1.8 258 10 172.0 176.0 17:10 347.060 0.20 129 86 83 1.80 1.8 258 11 176.0 180.0 17:14 350.020 0.20 129 86 83 1.80 1.8 258 11 180.0 184.0 17:18 352.980 0.20 129 86 83 1.80 1.8 258 12 184.0 188.0 17:22 355.940 0.20 129 86 83 1.80 1.8 250 

188.0 17:26 358.900

Average: 143.50 0.21 126.3 90.1 87.1 1.87 1.80 253.1 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Willows CA Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) 2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.85Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) 0.63 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.61 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 18.70379 CO2 (%) 0.23 Md 28.86 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.63 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

10:20 0.0 126 254 253 1.1 1.1 5 5 0.00 0 86 86 10:25 5.0 127 258 258 1.1 1.1 5 5 6.63 6.346 86 8710:30 10.0 127 258 258 1.1 1.1 5 6 13.35 12.95 86 8710:35 15.0 126 254 256 1.1 1.1 5 6 19.80 19.25 88 8910:40 20.0 216 255 256 1.1 1.1 5 6 26.20 25.5 88 8910:45 25.0 127 254 256 1.0 1.1 5 6 32.62 31.5 89 9010:50 30.0 127 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 6 38.78 37.95 90 9110:55 35.0 127 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 5 44.40 43.2 91 9211:00 40.0 128 256 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 50.14 49.6 92 9311:05 45.0 128 254 255 1.0 1.0 5 5 55.60 54.12 94 9511:10 50.0 128 255 256 1.0 1.0 4 5 61.80 60.4 94 9611:15 55.0 128 255 254 1.0 1.0 4 5 68.40 66.5 96 9711:20 60.0 127 255 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 74.09 71.95 98 9911:25 65.0 127 255 256 1.0 1.0 5 5 80.61 77.89 98 9911:30 70.0 127 256 257 1.0 1.0 5 6 87.21 84.16 99 10011:35 75.0 128 256 256 1.0 1.0 5 6 94.00 91 100 10111:40 80.0 127 255 257 1.0 1.0 5 6 102.31 98.01 100 10111:45 85.0 127 256 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 107.15 103.57 100 10111:50 90.0 127 256 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 113.54 110.15 101 10211:55 95.0 127 254 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 120.62 117.62 101 10212:00 100.0 127 254 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 126.81 123.85 101 10212:05 105.0 127 254 258 1.0 1.05 5 6 132.61 125.95 101 10212:10 110.0 128 253 256 1.0 1.05 5 6 138.94 135.85 99 9912:15 115.0 128 253 257 1.0 1.05 5 6 145.29 142.01 99 9812:20 120.0 151.294 148.899 

Average 120.0 130.9 254.9 256.1 94.875 95.75

Volume 151.294 148.899 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

0.000 @ 12" 0.002 @ 12" 0.005 @ 1

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Willows CA Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) 2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.63 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.61 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 18.70379 CO2 (%) 0.23 Md 28.86 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.63 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

12:46 0.0 131 236 237 1 1 5 5 0.00 0 97 98 12:51 5.0 130 254 254 1 1 4 5 6.12 5.87 97 9712:56 10.0 130 253 254 1 1 5 5 11.89 11.05 97 9713:01 15.0 131 255 251 1 1 5 6 17.56 16.41 97 9813:06 20.0 133 255 251 1 1 5 5 23.42 22.41 97 9613:11 25.0 133 255 253 1 1 5 5 29.29 28.64 97 9613:16 30.0 132 255 256 1 1 5 6 35.70 35.32 97 9713:21 35.0 133 256 253 1 1 5 6 42.61 42.3 97 9713:26 40.0 132 255 254 1 1 5 5 47.91 47.36 97 9813:31 45.0 134 257 254 1 1 5 5 54.44 53.55 97 9813:36 50.0 134 256 256 1 1 5 5 61.25 60.03 97 9813:41 55.0 134 257 256 1 1 5 5 67.35 66.95 97 9813:46 60.0 134 256 253 1 1 5 5 73.58 73.15 98 9913:51 65.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 80.58 79.95 99 10013:56 70.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 88.00 86.41 99 10014:01 75.0 134 254 253 1 1 5 5 94.31 92.51 99 10014:06 80.0 135 255 253 1 1 5 5 101.56 98.82 99 10014:11 85.0 135 255 254 1 1 5 5 105.21 105.32 99 10014:16 90.0 136 254 251 1 1 5 5 114.91 111.89 99 10014:21 95.0 136 255 253 1 1 5 5 121.45 118.95 99 10114:26 100.0 135 254 252 1 1 5 5 127.85 124.95 99 10114:31 105.0 135 253 251 1 1 5 5 134.16 131.36 99 10114:36 110.0 135 254 252 1 1 5 5 141.59 138.15 99 10114:41 115.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 144.82 143.75 99 10114:46 120.0 150.735 149.483 

Average 120.0 133.5 254.0 252.5 97.95833333 98.83

Volume 150.735 149.483 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Trap/ Probe Temp

0.004 @ 1

Pre Tes

0.002 @ 12" 0.002 @ 8" 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Johns Manville DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Willows CA Rate (L/m) 1 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/A

Source 027 Melter Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 13-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator BB Bws (%) 2.15 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.63 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.61 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 18.70379 CO2 (%) 0.23 Md 28.86 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.63 Act. Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 120.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #REF!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B A B A B 

15:04 0.0 133 251 252 1 1 4 4 0.00 0 104 104 15:09 5.0 133 252 252 1 1 4 4 6.12 5.85 104 10415:14 10.0 131 251 252 1 1 4 5 12.21 11.59 104 10515:19 15.0 130 250 251 1 1 5 5 17.68 18.05 105 10615:24 20.0 133 250 254 1 1 5 5 23.95 24.27 104 10515:29 25.0 135 251 251 1 1 5 5 30.15 30.26 105 10515:34 30.0 135 251 252 1 1 5 5 36.45 36.54 105 10615:39 35.0 135 251 254 1 1 5 5 42.81 42.81 105 10615:44 40.0 135 250 251 1 1 5 5 48.99 48.96 106 10615:49 45.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 56.55 56.31 106 10515:54 50.0 133 253 253 1 1 5 5 62.91 62.81 106 10615:59 55.0 134 253 253 1 1 5 5 69.19 68.66 106 10616:04 60.0 135 254 254 1 1 5 5 74.19 73.66 105 10616:09 65.0 133 251 254 1 1 5 5 80.89 80.62 105 10616:14 70.0 137 251 252 1 1 5 5 86.56 86.21 105 10516:19 75.0 138 250 252 1 1 5 5 93.25 93.15 105 10616:24 80.0 138 253 251 1 1 5 5 99.82 99.75 106 10616:29 85.0 140 253 250 1 1 5 5 105.71 105.68 106 10516:34 90.0 141 252 251 1 1 5 5 111.75 111.85 106 10516:39 95.0 140 251 251 1 1 5 5 118.43 118.41 106 10516:44 100.0 141 251 250 1 1 5 5 124.85 121.81 105 10516:49 105.0 142 252 252 1 1 5 5 131.68 131.59 106 10516:54 110.0 142 251 251 1 1 5 6 138.15 137.91 105 10516:59 115.0 142 251 251 1 1 5 6 144.52 144.23 105 10517:04 120.0 150.981 150.525 

Average 120.0 136.3 251.5 252.0 105.2083333 105.33

Volume 150.981 150.525 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Leak 

Pre Test Post Test Pre Tes

0.002 @ 17" 0.002 @10" 0.005 @1

Trap/ Probe Temp 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # 90 Pollutant Cr6 Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 12 wcs Method 61 Total Points 24 12:15 12:16 547.99 547.991

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 027 melter Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 14-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 2.01 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 20.52 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.76Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 31.6 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.283 O2 (%) 20.13 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00044 CO2 (%) 0.15 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.61 Act. Flow (cfm) 31,352 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 119.14 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,738

Moisture % 2.02 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 27,181

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 12:18 548.07 0.22 131 91 91 1.31 1.26 

1 4.0 8.0 12:22 550.486 0.22 131 88 90 1.31 1.26 2 8.0 12.0 12:26 552.995 0.22 130 89 90 1.31 1.26 2 12.0 16.0 12:30 555.405 0.22 130 90 90 1.31 1.26 3 16.0 20.0 12:34 557.901 0.22 131 90 90 1.31 1.26 3 20.0 24.0 12:38 560.4 0.22 131 91 90 1.31 1.26 4 24.0 28.0 12:42 562.854 0.25 131 92 90 1.49 1.43 4 28.0 32.0 12:46 565.47 0.25 131 92 90 1.49 1.43 5 32.0 36.0 12:50 567.999 0.23 132 93 90 1.37 1.31 5 36.0 40.0 12:54 570.70 0.23 132 93 91 1.37 1.31 6 40.0 44.0 12:58 573.365 0.21 132 94 91 1.25 1.28 6 44.0 48.0 13:02 575.925 0.21 132 94 92 1.25 1.28 7 48.0 52.0 13:06 578.654 0.20 134 96 92 1.19 1.14 7 52.0 56.0 13:10 581 0.20 133 96 92 1.19 1.14 8 56.0 60.0 13:14 583.652 0.20 133 97 93 1.19 1.14 8 60.0 64.0 13:18 586.09 0.20 133 98 93 1.19 1.14 9 64.0 68.0 13:22 588.65 0.19 133 99 94 1.13 1.09 9 68.0 72.0 13:26 591.18 0.19 134 100 95 1.13 1.09 

10 72.0 76.0 13:30 593.701 0.19 133 100 96 1.13 1.09 10 76.0 80.0 13:34 596.25 0.19 134 101 96 1.13 1.09 11 80.0 84.0 13:38 598.901 0.23 134 101 97 1.37 1.32 11 84.0 88.0 13:42 601.4 0.23 134 101 97 1.37 1.32 12 88.0 92.0 13:46 604.169 0.19 134 102 97 1.13 1.09 12 92.0 96.0 13:50 606.562 0.19 134 103 98 1.13 1.09 

1 96.0 100.0 13:59 609.20 0.16 131 103 100 0.95 0.92 1 100.0 104.0 14:03 611.46 0.16 131 103 100 0.95 0.92 2 104.0 108.0 14:07 613.754 0.16 131 103 100 0.95 0.92 2 108.0 112.0 14:11 616.00 0.16 131 103 100 0.95 0.92 3 112.0 116.0 14:15 618.22 0.20 134 103 102 1.19 1.15 3 116.0 120.0 14:19 620.958 0.20 134 103 101 1.19 1.15 4 120.0 124.0 14:23 623.581 0.24 135 102 101 1.43 1.38 4 124.0 128.0 14:27 626.251 0.24 135 103 101 1.43 1.38 5 128.0 132.0 14:31 628.96 0.23 135 103 101 1.37 1.32 5 132.0 136.0 14:35 631.76 0.23 135 102 100 1.37 1.32 6 136.0 140.0 14:39 634.425 0.24 135 101 100 1.43 1.38 6 140.0 144.0 14:43 637.195 0.24 135 101 100 1.43 1.38 7 144.0 148.0 14:47 640.025 0.25 135 101 99 1.49 1.44 7 148.0 152.0 14:51 642.995 0.25 136 101 99 1.49 1.44 8 152.0 156.0 14:55 645.951 0.25 136 101 98 1.49 1.44 8 156.0 160.0 14:59 649.023 0.25 136 101 98 1.49 1.44 9 160.0 164.0 15:03 652.003 0.25 136 98 97 1.49 1.44 9 164.0 168.0 15:07 654.9 0.25 136 98 97 1.49 1.44 

10 168.0 172.0 15:11 657.86 0.24 136 98 96 1.43 1.38 10 172.0 176.0 15:15 660.645 0.24 135 98 96 1.43 1.38 11 176.0 180.0 15:19 663.209 0.22 136 97 95 1.31 1.27 11 180.0 184.0 15:23 665.60 0.22 136 96 95 1.31 1.27 12 184.0 188.0 15:27 668.23 0.24 136 95 94 1.43 1.38 12 188.0 192.0 15:31 671 0.24 136 95 94 1.43 1.38 

192.0 15:35 673.769

Average: 125.70 0.22 133.5 97.9 95.6 1.30 1.25 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # 90 Pollutant Cr6 Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 12 wcs Method 61 Total Points 24 12:15 12:16 547.99 547.991

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 027 melter Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 32.3 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96 13:57 13:58 609.300 609.300Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 29.1 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.283 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00044 CO2 (%) 0.13 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.57 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,235 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 120.52 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,574

Moisture % 2.34 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 26,931

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3010 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 7:58 674.40 0.19 112 59 56 1.11 1.07 

1 4.0 8.0 8:02 676.632 0.19 112 59 56 1.11 1.10 2 8.0 12.0 8:06 678.95 0.23 112 59 56 1.34 1.33 2 12.0 16.0 8:10 681.55 0.23 113 59 56 1.34 1.33 3 16.0 20.0 8:14 684.213 0.25 114 62 59 1.46 1.44 3 20.0 24.0 8:18 687.023 0.25 115 64 58 1.46 1.44 4 24.0 28.0 8:22 689.521 0.24 115 65 59 1.40 1.39 4 28.0 32.0 8:26 691.995 0.24 115 66 59 1.40 1.39 5 32.0 36.0 8:30 694.421 0.25 115 66 60 1.46 1.44 5 36.0 40.0 8:34 697.02 0.25 116 68 61 1.46 1.44 6 40.0 44.0 8:38 699.645 0.24 116 69 61 1.40 1.39 6 44.0 48.0 8:42 702.3 0.24 116 71 70 1.40 1.39 7 48.0 52.0 8:46 704.975 0.24 116 71 64 1.40 1.39 7 52.0 56.0 8:50 707.67 0.24 117 73 65 1.40 1.39 8 56.0 60.0 8:54 710.352 0.22 117 74 66 1.28 1.27 8 60.0 64.0 8:58 712.92 0.22 117 74 66 1.28 1.27 9 64.0 68.0 9:02 715.49 0.22 118 75 68 1.28 1.27 9 68.0 72.0 9:06 718.04 0.22 118 76 69 1.28 1.27 

10 72.0 76.0 9:10 720.601 0.20 118 77 70 1.17 1.15 10 76.0 80.0 9:14 723.106 0.20 119 78 71 1.17 1.15 11 80.0 84.0 9:18 725.801 0.19 119 79 72 1.11 1.10 11 84.0 88.0 9:22 728.301 0.19 119 78 73 1.11 1.10 12 88.0 92.0 9:26 730.506 0.20 119 79 73 1.17 1.15 12 92.0 96.0 9:30 733.205 0.20 119 79 74 1.17 1.16 

1 96.0 100.0 9:42 735.85 0.15 118 77 75 0.88 0.87 1 100.0 104.0 9:46 737.85 0.15 118 77 75 0.88 0.87 2 104.0 108.0 9:50 739.895 0.15 118 77 75 0.88 0.87 2 108.0 112.0 9:54 741.90 0.15 120 82 78 0.88 0.87 3 112.0 116.0 9:58 744.10 0.18 120 84 78 1.05 1.04 3 116.0 120.0 10:02 746.521 0.18 121 85 80 1.05 1.04 4 120.0 124.0 10:06 748.952 0.18 121 86 80 1.05 1.04 4 124.0 128.0 10:10 751.4 0.18 123 86 81 1.05 1.04 5 128.0 132.0 10:14 753.79 0.20 123 87 82 1.17 1.15 5 132.0 136.0 10:18 756.45 0.20 123 87 82 1.17 1.15 6 136.0 140.0 10:22 759.003 0.21 123 88 83 1.23 1.21 6 140.0 144.0 10:26 761.6 0.21 124 89 84 1.23 1.21 7 144.0 148.0 10:30 764.2 0.21 124 90 84 1.23 1.21 7 148.0 152.0 10:34 766.93 0.21 124 90 85 1.23 1.21 8 152.0 156.0 10:38 769.624 0.21 124 91 86 1.23 1.21 8 156.0 160.0 10:42 772.253 0.21 124 91 86 1.23 1.21 9 160.0 164.0 10:46 774.821 0.22 125 92 87 1.28 1.27 9 164.0 168.0 10:50 777.551 0.22 128 94 88 1.28 1.27 

10 168.0 172.0 10:54 780.30 0.21 125 94 88 1.23 1.21 10 172.0 176.0 10:58 783.029 0.21 126 98 88 1.23 1.21 11 176.0 180.0 11:02 785.581 0.21 126 95 90 1.23 1.21 11 180.0 184.0 11:06 788.25 0.21 126 95 90 1.23 1.21 12 184.0 188.0 11:10 790.698 0.21 126 95 90 1.23 1.21 12 188.0 192.0 11:14 793.5 0.21 126 95 90 1.23 1.21 

192.0 11:18 796.1255

Average: 121.73 0.21 119.6 79.3 73.9 1.22 1.20 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # 90 Pollutant Cr6+ Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 12wcs Method 0061 Total Points 24 11:45 11:46 799.400 799.400

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 027 melter Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 44.6 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96 15:06 15:07 922.950 922.950Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 32.5 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.283 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00044 CO2 (%) 0.13 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.50 Act. Flow (cfm) 29,676 Must delete extra zeros in 

Vmnstd 117.81 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 26,449

Moisture % 2.99 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 25,661

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3018 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

1 0.0 4.0 11:49 799.50 0.17 128 96 96 0.99 1 

1 4.0 8.0 11:53 802.002 0.17 128 96 96 0.99 1.00 2 8.0 12.0 11:57 804.421 0.17 130 96 96 0.99 1.00 2 12.0 16.0 12:01 806.89 0.17 130 99 97 0.99 1.00 3 16.0 20.0 12:05 809.105 0.17 130 99 97 0.99 1.00 3 20.0 24.0 12:09 811.553 0.17 130 99 97 0.99 1.00 4 24.0 28.0 12:13 813.954 0.20 130 99 97 1.17 1.17 4 28.0 32.0 12:17 816.636 0.20 131 100 97 1.17 1.17 5 32.0 36.0 12:21 819.2 0.22 131 99 97 1.29 1.29 5 36.0 40.0 12:25 821.86 0.22 131 98 97 1.29 1.29 6 40.0 44.0 12:29 824.676 0.20 131 98 97 1.17 1.17 6 44.0 48.0 12:33 827.345 0.20 131 98 96 1.17 1.17 7 48.0 52.0 12:37 830.005 0.21 131 98 96 1.23 1.23 7 52.0 56.0 12:41 832.804 0.21 132 98 96 1.23 1.23 8 56.0 60.0 12:45 835.56 0.23 131 98 96 1.35 1.35 8 60.0 64.0 12:49 838.30 0.23 131 98 97 1.35 1.35 9 64.0 68.0 12:53 841.20 0.24 131 98 97 1.40 1.41 9 68.0 72.0 12:57 844.02 0.24 132 98 97 1.40 1.41 

10 72.0 76.0 13:01 846.678 0.22 132 99 97 1.29 1.29 10 76.0 80.0 13:05 849.2 0.22 132 99 97 1.29 1.29 11 80.0 84.0 13:09 851.83 0.21 133 97 97 1.23 1.23 11 84.0 88.0 13:13 854.645 0.21 133 98 97 1.23 1.23 12 88.0 92.0 13:17 857.201 0.21 133 97 97 1.23 1.23 12 92.0 96.0 13:21 859.888 0.21 133 97 96 1.23 1.23 

1 96.0 100.0 13:29 862.56 0.21 134 95 95 1.23 1.23 1 100.0 104.0 13:33 865.34 0.21 134 95 95 1.23 1.23 2 104.0 108.0 13:37 867.775 0.21 134 96 95 1.23 1.23 2 108.0 112.0 13:41 870.60 0.21 134 96 95 1.23 1.23 3 112.0 116.0 13:45 873.00 0.15 134 97 95 0.88 0.88 3 116.0 120.0 13:49 875.201 0.15 134 96 95 0.88 0.88 4 120.0 124.0 13:53 877.412 0.16 134 97 96 0.94 0.94 4 124.0 128.0 13:57 879.8 0.16 134 96 96 0.94 0.94 5 128.0 132.0 14:01 882.13 0.18 135 96 96 1.05 1.05 5 132.0 136.0 14:05 884.68 0.18 135 96 96 1.05 1.05 6 136.0 140.0 14:09 887.143 0.18 135 96 96 1.05 1.05 6 140.0 144.0 14:13 889.77 0.18 135 95 95 1.05 1.05 7 144.0 148.0 14:17 892.199 0.19 136 96 95 1.11 1.11 7 148.0 152.0 14:21 894.723 0.19 136 96 95 1.11 1.11 8 152.0 156.0 14:25 897.345 0.20 136 97 96 1.17 1.17 8 156.0 160.0 14:29 899.945 0.20 136 97 96 1.17 1.17 9 160.0 164.0 14:33 902.612 0.20 136 97 96 1.17 1.17 9 164.0 168.0 14:37 905.195 0.20 136 97 96 1.17 1.17 

10 168.0 172.0 14:41 907.73 0.19 136 96 96 1.11 1.11 10 172.0 176.0 14:45 910.345 0.19 136 95 95 1.11 1.11 11 176.0 180.0 14:49 913.009 0.19 137 95 95 1.11 1.11 11 180.0 184.0 14:53 915.43 0.19 136 95 95 1.11 1.11 12 184.0 188.0 14:57 917.905 0.19 136 94 94 1.11 1.11 12 188.0 192.0 15:01 920.513 0.19 137 95 94 1.11 1.11 

192.0 15:05 922.9

Average: 123.40 0.20 133.1 96.9 96.0 1.15 1.15 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method M26A Total Points 24 12:09 12:10 .002 @ 7"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 3.0 14:43 14:44 .002 @ 10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 14-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.21 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 5.6 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96

Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 16.9 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.282 O2 (%) 20.13 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.2 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.59 Act. Flow (cfm) 31,774 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 46.59 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 28,383

Moisture % 2.22 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 27,755

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3009 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 12:20 919.11 0.20 127 85 85 1.23 1.3 250 250 60 4

2 3.0 6.0 12:23 921.05 0.20 127 85 85 1.23 1.3 250 250 60 4

3 6.0 9.0 12:26 923.00 0.21 127 85 85 1.29 1.4 250 250 60 4

4 9.0 12.0 12:29 924.90 0.21 130 86 86 1.29 1.4 250 250 60 4

5 12.0 15.0 12:32 926.85 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

6 15.0 18.0 12:35 928.80 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

7 18.0 21.0 12:38 930.80 0.22 130 86 86 1.35 1.4 250 250 60 4

8 21.0 24.0 12:41 932.75 0.25 130 87 87 1.54 1.5 250 249 60 4

9 24.0 27.0 12:44 934.86 0.25 130 87 87 1.54 1.5 250 249 60 4

10 27.0 30.0 12:47 936.90 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

11 30.0 33.0 12:50 938.80 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

12 33.0 36.0 12:53 940.75 0.22 130 87 87 1.35 1.3 250 246 63 4

1 36.0 39.0 14:02 944.68 0.22 133 92 92 1.35 1.3 250 250 65 4

2 39.0 42.0 14:05 946.65 0.25 133 92 92 1.54 1.5 250 250 65 4

3 42.0 45.0 14:08 948.72 0.25 133 92 92 1.54 1.5 250 250 65 4

4 45.0 48.0 14:11 950.81 0.25 134 95 95 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

5 48.0 51.0 14:14 952.90 0.25 134 95 95 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

6 51.0 54.0 14:17 954.90 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 248 65 4

7 54.0 57.0 14:20 956.90 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 254 65 4

8 57.0 60.0 14:23 958.92 0.25 135 98 97 1.54 1.5 250 254 65 4

9 60.0 63.0 14:26 961.00 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

10 63.0 66.0 14:29 962.85 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

11 66.0 69.0 14:32 964.71 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

12 69.0 72.0 14:35 966.56 0.20 135 98 98 1.23 1.2 250 251 65 4

72.0 14:38 968.41

Average: 49.30 0.23 131.8 91.1 91.0 1.39 1.38 250 250 62.875 4

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant HCl & HF Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method M26A Total Points 24 8:00 8:01 0.0 @ 10"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0 10:25 10:26 0.0 @10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 11.4 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.96

Barometric 30.00 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.7 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 30.00 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.281 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 30,034 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 46.16 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 27,449

Moisture % 2.11 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.1 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 26,874

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3007 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 8:07 969.82 0.20 115 60 60 1.20 1.2 250 250 60 3

2 3.0 6.0 8:10 971.60 0.20 115 59 59 1.20 1.2 250 248 45 3

3 6.0 9.0 8:13 973.41 0.20 115 59 59 1.20 1.2 250 252 45 3

4 9.0 12.0 8:16 975.25 0.20 116 65 60 1.20 1.2 250 249 47 3

5 12.0 15.0 8:19 977.09 0.20 116 65 60 1.20 1.2 250 249 47 3

6 15.0 18.0 8:22 979.00 0.22 116 68 61 1.32 1.3 251 251 48 3

7 18.0 21.0 8:25 980.83 0.22 116 68 61 1.32 1.3 251 251 48 3

8 21.0 24.0 8:28 982.75 0.22 116 69 63 1.32 1.3 249 250 49 3

9 24.0 27.0 8:31 984.69 0.22 116 69 63 1.32 1.3 249 250 49 3

10 27.0 30.0 8:34 986.62 0.20 116 69 63 1.20 1.2 249 250 49 3

11 30.0 33.0 8:37 988.46 0.20 116 73 65 1.20 1.2 250 253 50 3

12 33.0 36.0 8:40 990.35 0.20 116 73 65 1.20 1.2 250 253 50 3

1 36.0 39.0 9:48 994.13 0.20 119 74 75 1.20 1.2 248 247 50 3

2 39.0 42.0 9:51 996.00 0.20 120 77 75 1.20 1.2 248 247 54 3

3 42.0 45.0 9:54 997.90 0.20 120 77 75 1.20 1.2 250 251 54 3

4 45.0 48.0 9:57 999.75 0.20 121 82 77 1.20 1.2 250 246 53 3

5 48.0 51.0 10:00 1001.63 0.20 121 82 78 1.20 1.2 252 250 54 3

6 51.0 54.0 10:03 1003.52 0.20 121 84 79 1.20 1.2 248 244 56 3

7 54.0 57.0 10:06 1005.40 0.22 121 84 80 1.32 1.3 248 253 57 3

8 57.0 60.0 10:09 1007.36 0.22 122 84 80 1.32 1.3 251 244 57 3

9 60.0 63.0 10:12 1009.34 0.22 122 84 80 1.32 1.3 247 252 57 3

10 63.0 66.0 10:15 1011.33 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.2 248 251 57 3

11 66.0 69.0 10:18 1013.22 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.20 248 251 57 3

12 69.0 72.0 10:21 1015.10 0.20 122 86 82 1.20 1.2 248 251 57 3

72.0 10:24 1017.00

Average: 47.18 0.21 118.4 74.3 70.2 1.24 1.23 249.4 249.7 52.1 3

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre Post

Company JM DGM # 19WCS Method 29 Total Points 24 10:45 10:46 0.002 @10"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0 12:28 12:29 0.002 @ 10"

Source #27 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 15-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0

Operator SS Bws (%) 2.1 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0

Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 6.3 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.76

Barometric 29.80 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13.3 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.80 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.6 Actual Dn (in) 0.282 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 4.88 An (ft^2) 0.00043 CO2 (%) 0.1 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 18.70

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 29,485 Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity column

Vmnstd 43.26 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.22 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 26,371

Moisture % 2.09 Preliminary Ts (oF) 138 Est. Us (ft/s) 28.2 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 25,822

Preliminary Tm (oF) 90 Theor Dn (in) 0.3002 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not Touch"

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp. 

(*F)

Filter Temp 

(*F)

Imp temp. 

(*F) Pump Vac.

1 0.0 3.0 10:50 1018.60 0.20 124 86 87 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

2 3.0 6.0 10:53 1020.40 0.20 124 86 87 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

3 6.0 9.0 10:56 1022.23 0.20 124 88 87 1.24 1.2 250 248 65 3

4 9.0 12.0 10:59 1024.05 0.20 125 88 88 1.24 1.2 250 254 65 3

5 12.0 15.0 11:02 1025.92 0.20 124 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 254 65 3

6 15.0 18.0 11:05 1027.82 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 250 65 3

7 18.0 21.0 11:08 1029.72 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 250 252 65 3

8 21.0 24.0 11:11 1031.63 0.20 125 90 88 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

9 24.0 27.0 11:14 1033.51 0.20 126 90 88 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

10 27.0 30.0 11:17 1035.39 0.20 126 90 89 1.24 1.2 251 251 65 3

11 30.0 33.0 11:20 1037.25 0.20 126 90 89 1.24 1.2 247 241 65 3

12 33.0 36.0 11:23 1039.11 0.20 126 91 89 1.24 1.2 251 255 65 3

1 36.0 39.0 11:50 1042.80 0.18 128 91 90 1.12 1.12 253 255 65 3

2 39.0 42.0 11:53 1044.60 0.18 128 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 252 65 3

3 42.0 45.0 11:56 1046.40 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 251 250 63 3

4 45.0 48.0 11:59 1048.20 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

5 48.0 51.0 12:02 1049.98 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

6 51.0 54.0 12:05 1051.75 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 250 250 63 3

7 54.0 57.0 12:08 1053.50 0.18 129 93 94 1.12 1.12 252 248 63 3

8 57.0 60.0 12:11 1055.30 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

9 60.0 63.0 12:14 1057.13 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

10 63.0 66.0 12:17 1059.01 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 247 247 64 3

11 66.0 69.0 12:20 1060.90 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 250 250 64 3

12 69.0 72.0 12:23 1062.78 0.20 130 95 93 1.24 1.2 250 250 64 3

72.0 12:26 1064.69

Average: 46.09 0.19 127.1 91.4 90.6 1.21 1.18 249.9 250.1 64.375 3.0

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 10:20 10:21 0.00@15"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0 12:40 12:21 0.0Source #28 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JP Bws (%) 2.84 # of Ports 5 Total Run 125.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 28.9 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13.3 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.222 O2 (%) 20.24 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00027 CO2 (%) 0.11 Md 28.83 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.52 Act. Flow (cfm) 56,855 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 67.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 93.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 52,154

Moisture % 2.85 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 50,674

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2490 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Prob

5 0.0 5.0 10:25 912.02 0.25 110 78 77 0.56 0.58 

4 5.0 10.0 10:30 914.10 0.42 109 78 77 0.94 0.97 3 10.0 15.0 10:35 917.00 0.40 109 79 77 0.90 0.93 2 15.0 20.0 10:40 919.90 0.31 109 79 78 0.70 0.72 1 20.0 25.0 10:45 922.40 0.26 109 80 78 0.58 0.6 5 25.0 30.0 10:50 924.68 0.25 111 79 78 0.56 0.58 4 30.0 35.0 10:57 927.00 0.48 110 80 78 1.08 1.11 3 35.0 40.0 11:02 930.00 0.57 110 81 79 1.28 1.32 2 40.0 45.0 11:07 933.10 0.55 111 81 79 1.24 1.27 1 45.0 50.0 11:12 937.20 0.50 110 82 79 1.12 1.16 5 50.0 55.0 11:17 939.49 0.36 112 81 80 0.81 0.82 4 55.0 60.0 11:24 941.50 0.36 112 82 80 0.81 0.82 3 60.0 65.0 11:29 944.50 0.55 111 82 80 1.24 1.26 2 65.0 70.0 11:34 947.50 0.49 110 83 81 1.11 1.12 1 70.0 75.0 11:39 950.40 0.49 111 84 82 1.11 1.13 5 75.0 80.0 11:44 953.94 0.44 112 84 82 1.00 1.01 4 80.0 85.0 11:50 957.00 0.51 112 74 83 1.16 1.17 3 85.0 90.0 11:55 959.90 0.51 112 75 83 1.16 1.17 2 90.0 95.0 12:00 963.00 0.45 111 76 84 1.02 1.04 1 95.0 100.0 12:05 966.20 0.32 111 87 84 0.73 0.74 5 100.0 105.0 12:10 968.81 0.32 112 87 85 0.73 0.74 4 105.0 110.0 12:16 971.20 0.32 112 87 85 0.73 0.74 3 110.0 115.0 12:21 974.20 0.32 112 87 86 0.73 0.74 2 115.0 120.0 12:26 976.40 0.35 112 87 86 0.80 0.81 1 120.0 125.0 12:31 979.40 0.36 111 87 86 0.82 0.87 

125.0 12:36 981.70

Average: 69.68 0.41 110.8 81.6 81.1 0.92 0.94 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #89 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 13:15 13:16 0.000 @ 10"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0 15:34 15:35 0.00Source #28 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator JP Bws (%) 2.75 # of Ports 5 Total Run 125.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 25.5 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 13.1 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.49 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.16 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.08 Md 28.82 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.52 Act. Flow (cfm) 55,335 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 994.80 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 93.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 50,437

Moisture % 0.18 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 49,049

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2489 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Prob

5 0.0 5.0 13:20 982.27 0.25 114 86 87 0.53 0.58 

4 5.0 10.0 13:25 984.40 0.35 114 87 87 0.74 0.81 3 10.0 15.0 13:30 988.50 0.30 114 87 87 0.63 0.65 2 15.0 20.0 13:35 990.30 0.30 113 87 87 0.63 0.65 1 20.0 25.0 13:40 992.00 0.25 113 87 87 0.53 0.58 5 25.0 30.0 13:45 994.16 0.25 114 87 87 0.53 0.58 4 30.0 35.0 13:51 996.50 0.25 114 87 87 0.53 0.58 3 35.0 40.0 13:56 998.50 0.55 114 87 87 1.16 1.19 2 40.0 45.0 14:01 1001.50 0.55 114 87 87 1.16 1.19 1 45.0 50.0 14:06 1005.00 0.48 114 88 88 1.01 1.03 5 50.0 55.0 14:11 1007.85 0.32 115 88 88 0.67 0.69 4 55.0 60.0 14:17 1010.00 0.32 115 88 88 0.68 0.69 3 60.0 65.0 14:22 1012.60 0.52 115 89 88 1.10 1.12 2 65.0 70.0 14:27 1015.60 0.52 115 89 88 1.10 1.12 1 70.0 75.0 14:32 1018.60 0.41 114 89 89 0.87 0.88 5 75.0 80.0 14:37 1020.56 0.40 116 89 89 0.85 0.86 4 80.0 85.0 14:45 1024.50 0.40 115 89 89 0.85 0.86 3 85.0 90.0 14:50 1027.60 0.50 115 89 89 1.06 1.08 2 90.0 95.0 14:55 1030.50 0.50 115 89 90 1.06 1.08 1 95.0 100.0 15:00 1033.50 0.38 114 89 90 0.81 0.82 5 100.0 105.0 15:05 1036.26 0.35 115 89 90 0.75 0.75 4 105.0 110.0 15:11 1038.70 0.35 115 89 90 0.75 0.75 3 110.0 115.0 15:16 1041.90 0.35 115 89 90 0.75 0.75 2 115.0 120.0 15:21 1043.80 0.35 115 89 90 0.75 0.75 1 120.0 125.0 15:26 1046.40 0.35 116 89 91 0.75 0.75 

125.0 15:31 1048.94

Average: 66.67 0.38 114.5 88.1 88.4 0.81 0.83 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company JM DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 16:00 16:01 0.000 @ 15"

Location Willows Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0 18:00 18:01 .000 Source #28 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 3.02 # of Ports 5 Total Run 100.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 22.1 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.1 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.10 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.08 Md 28.82 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.49 Act. Flow (cfm) 54,605 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 89.48 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 75.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 49,947

Moisture % 1.72 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 48,437

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2492 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 4.0 16:15 49.34 0.25 113 93 97 0.53 0.53 2

4 4.0 8.0 16:19 50.90 0.25 113 93 97 0.53 0.53 23 8.0 12.0 16:23 52.70 0.25 113 93 97 0.53 0.53 22 12.0 16.0 16:27 54.50 0.25 112 93 97 0.53 0.53 21 16.0 20.0 16:31 56.10 0.30 112 92 97 0.64 0.64 25 20.0 24.0 16:35 58.09 0.25 113 93 92 0.53 0.53 24 24.0 28.0 16:40 59.80 0.25 113 93 95 0.53 0.53 23 28.0 32.0 16:44 61.60 0.55 113 93 97 1.17 1.17 22 32.0 36.0 16:48 64.00 0.55 113 93 97 1.17 1.17 21 36.0 40.0 16:52 66.30 0.52 113 92 97 1.11 1.1 25 40.0 44.0 16:56 68.93 0.35 112 91 97 0.74 0.74 24 44.0 48.0 17:01 70.90 0.35 113 92 97 0.75 0.74 23 48.0 52.0 17:05 72.90 0.55 111 91 97 1.17 1.17 22 52.0 56.0 17:09 75.30 0.55 112 91 97 1.17 1.17 21 56.0 60.0 17:13 78.50 0.40 112 92 97 0.86 0.85 25 60.0 64.0 17:17 80.67 0.40 113 92 97 0.86 0.85 24 64.0 68.0 17:22 82.90 0.40 113 92 97 0.86 0.85 23 68.0 72.0 17:26 85.20 0.50 112 91 96 1.07 1.06 22 72.0 76.0 17:30 87.90 0.50 112 91 96 1.07 1.06 21 76.0 80.0 17:34 90.20 0.39 113 91 96 0.84 0.83 25 80.0 84.0 17:38 92.41 0.30 112 91 95 0.65 0.64 24 84.0 88.0 17:43 94.20 0.30 112 92 96 0.65 0.64 23 88.0 92.0 17:47 96.00 0.32 112 90 95 0.69 0.68 22 92.0 96.0 17:51 97.90 0.32 112 90 95 0.69 0.68 21 96.0 100.0 17:55 99.90 0.32 113 90 95 0.69 0.68 2

100.0 17:59 101.92

Average: 52.59 0.37 112.5 91.8 96.2 0.80 0.80 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #72 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 19WCS Method 316 Total Points 25 10:20 10:21 0.00@10"

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 5.0 12:40 12:21 0.0Source #29 Delta ∆H@ 1.827 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator DM Bws (%) 3.01 # of Ports 5 Total Run 125.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 28.7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 16.4 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.08 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.08 Md 28.82 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.49 Act. Flow (cfm) 61,127 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 68.09 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 93.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 56,251

Moisture % 3.02 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 54,556

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2492 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 5.0 10:25 180.55 0.33 108 79 78 0.74 0.73 1

4 5.0 10.0 10:30 183.11 0.45 108 80 79 1.00 0.99 13 10.0 15.0 10:35 185.89 0.45 108 80 79 1.00 0.99 12 15.0 20.0 10:40 188.70 0.40 108 81 79 0.89 0.89 11 20.0 25.0 10:45 191.40 0.35 108 81 79 0.78 0.78 15 25.0 30.0 10:50 193.99 0.35 109 81 80 0.78 0.78 14 30.0 35.0 11:00 196.50 0.55 109 81 80 1.23 1.23 13 35.0 40.0 11:05 199.45 0.55 108 82 80 1.23 1.23 12 40.0 45.0 11:10 202.63 0.55 108 83 80 1.23 1.23 11 45.0 50.0 11:15 205.78 0.37 108 83 82 0.83 0.82 15 50.0 55.0 11:20 208.50 0.35 110 83 82 0.78 0.78 14 55.0 60.0 11:28 211.03 0.55 109 83 82 1.23 1.23 13 60.0 65.0 11:32 213.53 0.67 109 83 82 1.50 1.48 12 65.0 70.0 11:38 216.58 0.60 109 85 83 1.35 1.33 11 70.0 75.0 11:43 219.85 0.37 109 86 85 0.83 0.82 15 75.0 80.0 11:48 222.64 0.35 109 86 85 0.79 0.78 14 80.0 85.0 11:56 225.14 0.60 109 87 86 1.35 1.33 13 85.0 90.0 12:01 228.21 0.67 111 88 86 1.51 1.48 12 90.0 95.0 12:06 231.55 0.60 110 88 87 1.35 1.33 11 95.0 100.0 12:11 234.69 0.33 109 88 87 0.75 0.78 15 100.0 105.0 12:16 237.88 0.35 109 88 86 0.79 0.78 14 105.0 110.0 12:24 240.15 0.50 111 88 86 1.13 1.11 13 110.0 115.0 12:29 243.05 0.55 110 88 86 1.25 1.23 12 115.0 120.0 12:34 246.04 0.55 110 88 86 1.25 1.23 11 120.0 125.0 12:39 249.18 0.35 110 88 86 0.80 0.78 1

125.0 12:44 252.31

Average: 71.76 0.47 109.0 84.3 82.8 1.05 1.05 1

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 19WCS Method 316 Total Points 25 13:15 13:16 0.000 @ 9"

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 5.0 15:34 15:35 0.00Source #29 Delta ∆H@ 1.827 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator DM Bws (%) 2.9 # of Ports 5 Total Run 125.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 29.1 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 14.5 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.222 O2 (%) 20.01 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00027 CO2 (%) 0.08 Md 28.81 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.50 Act. Flow (cfm) 60,895 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 294.12 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 93.8 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 55,638

Moisture % 0.69 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 54,022

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2490 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 5.0 13:20 252.60 0.35 112 88 88 0.84 0.8 2

4 5.0 10.0 13:25 255.27 0.40 112 88 88 0.97 0.91 23 10.0 15.0 13:30 257.95 0.45 112 88 88 1.09 1.02 22 15.0 20.0 13:35 260.75 0.45 112 88 88 1.09 1.02 21 20.0 25.0 13:40 263.64 0.35 112 88 88 0.84 0.8 25 25.0 30.0 13:45 266.52 0.35 114 88 88 0.84 0.8 24 30.0 35.0 13:57 269.05 0.50 114 88 89 1.21 1.14 23 35.0 40.0 14:02 271.95 0.55 113 89 89 1.33 1.25 22 40.0 45.0 14:07 275.04 0.50 112 89 89 1.21 1.14 21 45.0 50.0 14:12 278.12 0.35 113 90 89 0.84 0.8 25 50.0 55.0 14:17 280.83 0.35 114 90 89 0.85 0.8 24 55.0 60.0 14:26 283.30 0.55 114 90 89 1.33 1.25 23 60.0 65.0 14:31 286.08 0.65 113 90 90 1.57 1.48 22 65.0 70.0 14:36 289.38 0.60 113 90 90 1.46 1.37 21 70.0 75.0 14:41 292.69 0.35 113 90 90 0.85 0.8 25 75.0 80.0 14:46 295.39 0.35 113 90 90 0.85 0.8 24 80.0 85.0 14:56 298.90 0.65 113 90 90 1.58 1.48 23 85.0 90.0 15:01 301.89 0.65 115 91 90 1.58 1.48 22 90.0 95.0 15:06 305.30 0.55 114 91 90 1.34 1.25 21 95.0 100.0 15:11 308.41 0.35 114 91 90 0.85 0.8 25 100.0 105.0 15:16 311.23 0.40 114 91 90 0.98 0.91 24 105.0 110.0 15:25 313.91 0.50 114 90 91 1.22 1.14 23 110.0 115.0 15:30 316.84 0.50 113 91 91 1.23 1.14 22 115.0 120.0 15:35 319.83 0.50 113 91 91 1.23 1.14 21 120.0 125.0 15:40 322.84 0.35 112 92 91 0.86 0.8 2

125.0 15:45 325.42

Average: 72.82 0.46 113.1 89.7 89.4 1.12 1.05 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #89 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 19WCS Method 316 Total Points 25 16:00 16:01 0.000 @ 7"

Location Willows, Ca Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 4.0 18:00 18:01 .000 Source #29 Delta ∆H@ 1.827 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator DM Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 5 Total Run 100.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 25.2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.67Barometric 29.71 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10.8 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.71 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.5 Actual Dn (in) 0.218 O2 (%) 20.03 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00026 CO2 (%) 0.07 Md 28.81 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.49 Act. Flow (cfm) 60,249 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 352.04 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 75.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 54,941

Moisture % 0.48 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 53,281

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2492 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 4.0 16:20 325.98 0.35 114 96 96 0.79 0.78 2

4 4.0 8.0 16:24 328.03 0.40 114 96 96 0.90 0.89 23 8.0 12.0 16:28 330.18 0.40 114 99 96 0.90 0.89 22 12.0 16.0 16:32 332.34 0.40 114 96 96 0.90 0.89 21 16.0 20.0 16:36 334.53 0.35 114 96 96 0.79 0.78 25 20.0 24.0 16:40 336.57 0.35 114 96 96 0.79 0.78 24 24.0 28.0 16:47 338.59 0.50 114 96 96 1.13 1.11 23 28.0 32.0 16:51 341.03 0.50 114 96 96 1.13 1.11 22 32.0 36.0 16:55 343.55 0.50 114 96 96 1.13 1.11 21 36.0 40.0 16:59 346.07 0.35 115 95 95 0.79 0.78 25 40.0 44.0 17:03 349.12 0.35 114 94 95 0.79 0.78 24 44.0 48.0 17:10 351.14 0.55 114 94 94 1.24 1.22 23 48.0 52.0 17:14 353.28 0.65 116 94 94 1.47 1.44 22 52.0 56.0 17:18 356.02 0.55 115 94 94 1.25 1.22 21 56.0 60.0 17:22 358.55 0.35 114 94 93 0.79 0.78 25 60.0 64.0 17:26 360.66 0.45 114 94 93 1.02 1 24 64.0 68.0 17:33 363.02 0.60 114 92 93 1.36 1.33 23 68.0 72.0 17:37 365.42 0.67 114 95 92 1.52 1.48 22 72.0 76.0 17:41 368.14 0.55 114 92 92 1.25 1.22 21 76.0 80.0 17:45 370.71 0.35 114 92 91 0.80 0.78 25 80.0 84.0 17:49 373.21 0.40 113 92 91 0.91 0.89 24 84.0 88.0 17:55 375.39 0.40 115 90 90 0.91 0.89 23 88.0 92.0 17:59 377.54 0.40 115 90 90 0.92 0.89 22 92.0 96.0 18:03 379.70 0.55 115 90 90 1.26 1.22 21 96.0 100.0 18:07 382.10 0.35 114 89 89 0.80 0.78 2

100.0 18:11 384.15

Average: 58.17 0.45 114.2 93.9 93.6 1.02 1.00 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 0.015 @12"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 3.0 0.0Source #30 Delta ∆H@ 1.822 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator DM Bws (%) 2.92 # of Ports 5 Total Run 75.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 19.2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.72Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 12.4 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.67 Actual Dn (in) 0.245 O2 (%) 20.00 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00033 CO2 (%) 0.06 Md 28.81 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.49 Act. Flow (cfm) 60,173 Must delete extra z

49.26 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 56.3 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 55,981

Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.4 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 54,349Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2491 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 3.0 9:30 385.537 0.25 104 75 74 0.89 0.81 2

4 3.0 6.0 9:33 387.180 0.35 102 75 74 1.24 1.14 23 6.0 9.0 9:36 388.990 0.32 102 75 74 1.14 1.05 22 9.0 12.0 9:39 390.750 0.45 104 77 74 1.60 1.47 21 12.0 15.0 9:42 392.720 0.33 103 77 75 1.17 1.08 25 15.0 18.0 9:49 394.450 0.35 103 77 76 1.24 1.14 24 18.0 21.0 9:52 396.280 0.55 103 77 78 1.95 1.8 23 21.0 24.0 9:55 398.450 0.67 103 77 78 2.38 2.18 22 24.0 27.0 9:58 400.950 0.67 104 77 78 2.38 2.18 21 27.0 30.0 10:01 403.350 0.43 104 79 77 1.53 1.41 25 30.0 33.0 10:06 405.275 0.25 103 80 76 0.89 0.82 24 33.0 36.0 10:09 406.850 0.55 103 80 78 1.96 1.8 23 36.0 39.0 10:12 409.150 0.80 104 80 75 2.85 2.62 22 39.0 42.0 10:15 411.630 0.67 103 81 80 2.39 2.2 21 42.0 45.0 10:18 414.030 0.30 103 81 79 1.07 0.98 25 45.0 48.0 10:25 415.715 0.33 105 82 79 1.18 1.08 24 48.0 51.0 10:28 417.490 0.57 105 82 80 2.04 1.87 23 51.0 54.0 10:31 419.750 0.70 104 82 80 2.51 2.3 22 54.0 57.0 10:34 422.385 0.65 103 82 80 2.33 2.14 21 57.0 60.0 10:37 424.760 0.35 103 82 81 1.26 1.15 25 60.0 63.0 10:45 426.577 0.35 106 82 81 1.26 1.15 24 63.0 66.0 10:48 428.000 0.47 105 82 81 1.69 1.54 23 66.0 69.0 10:51 430.720 0.47 105 82 81 1.70 1.54 22 69.0 72.0 10:54 432.890 0.47 105 82 81 1.70 1.54 21 72.0 75.0 10:57 434.915 0.35 105 82 81 1.27 1.15 2

75.0 436.915

Average: 51.38 0.47 103.8 79.5 78.0 1.66 1.53 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 11:30 11:31 0.002 @ 10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0 12:47 11:48 0.00Source #30 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 11-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator DM Bws (%) 3.3 # of Ports 5 Total Run 75.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 22.4 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.72Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11.7 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.67 Actual Dn (in) 0.244 O2 (%) 20.00 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00032 CO2 (%) 0.06 Md 28.81 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.45 Act. Flow (cfm) 55,225 Must delete extra z

451.74 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 56.3 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 50,972

Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 49,281Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2496 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 3.0 11:35 437.00 0.35 107 83 83 1.15 1.15 2

4 3.0 6.0 11:38 438.90 0.45 107 83 83 1.48 1.5 23 6.0 9.0 11:41 441.05 0.45 107 83 83 1.48 1.5 22 9.0 12.0 11:44 443.21 0.48 108 109 83 1.58 1.6 21 12.0 15.0 11:47 445.49 0.35 109 84 84 1.15 1.16 25 15.0 18.0 11:52 447.40 0.25 109 83 84 0.82 0.85 24 18.0 21.0 11:55 449.00 0.35 109 83 85 1.15 1.16 23 21.0 24.0 11:58 450.90 0.38 109 83 85 1.25 1.25 22 24.0 27.0 12:01 452.88 0.41 108 85 85 1.35 1.35 21 27.0 30.0 12:04 454.95 0.38 108 85 85 1.25 1.25 25 30.0 33.0 12:09 456.95 0.41 107 85 86 1.35 1.35 24 33.0 36.0 12:12 459.03 0.35 107 86 86 1.15 1.16 23 36.0 39.0 12:15 460.94 0.32 107 86 86 1.06 1.06 22 39.0 42.0 12:18 462.75 0.40 108 86 86 1.32 1.32 21 42.0 45.0 12:21 464.79 0.46 108 86 86 1.52 1.52 25 45.0 48.0 12:26 466.93 0.43 108 86 86 1.43 1.42 24 48.0 51.0 12:29 469.00 0.39 108 87 87 1.29 1.42 23 51.0 54.0 12:32 471.00 0.35 109 87 88 1.16 1.16 22 54.0 57.0 12:35 472.87 0.34 109 87 88 1.13 1.12 21 57.0 60.0 12:38 474.72 0.36 109 87 88 1.20 1.12 25 60.0 63.0 12:42 476.73 0.40 109 87 88 1.33 1.12 24 63.0 66.0 12:45 478.75 0.37 109 87 88 1.24 1.12 23 66.0 69.0 12:48 480.69 0.35 109 87 88 1.17 1.16 22 69.0 72.0 12:51 482.60 0.37 109 87 88 1.24 1.22 21 72.0 75.0 12:54 484.54 0.35 109 87 87 1.17 1.14 2

75.0 12:57 486.20

Average: 49.20 0.38 108.2 86.4 85.8 1.26 1.25 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #90 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 5 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 25 14:15 14:16 0.002 @ 10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0 15:56 15:57 .002 Source #30 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator DM Bws (%) 3.3 # of Ports 5 Total Run 75.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 28.2 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.72Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10.5 DGM Y 0.985 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.67 Actual Dn (in) 0.245 O2 (%) 20.00 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 60.5 X 60.5 An (ft^2) 0.00033 CO2 (%) 0.06 Md 28.81 Stack Area (sf) 25.42

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.45 Act. Flow (cfm) 61,517 Must delete extra zPreliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 56.3 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 56,800Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 54,899Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2496 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

5 0.0 3.0 14:15 488.860 0.30 107 93 93 1.02 1.01 2

4 3.0 6.0 14:18 490.660 0.40 107 93 94 1.35 1.34 23 6.0 9.0 14:21 492.740 0.50 107 93 94 1.69 1.68 22 9.0 12.0 14:24 494.845 0.51 107 94 94 1.73 1.71 21 12.0 15.0 14:27 497.200 0.51 107 94 94 1.73 1.71 25 15.0 18.0 14:33 499.600 0.35 109 92 92 1.19 1.17 24 18.0 21.0 14:36 501.540 0.38 109 92 92 1.29 1.27 23 21.0 24.0 14:39 503.550 0.38 109 92 92 1.29 1.27 22 24.0 27.0 14:42 505.565 0.46 109 92 92 1.56 1.54 21 27.0 30.0 14:45 507.780 0.58 107 92 92 1.96 1.94 25 30.0 33.0 14:54 510.270 0.55 107 92 92 1.87 1.84 24 33.0 36.0 14:57 512.695 0.57 107 92 93 1.94 1.91 23 36.0 39.0 15:00 515.170 0.58 107 92 93 1.97 1.94 22 39.0 42.0 15:03 517.650 0.61 107 92 93 2.08 2.04 21 42.0 45.0 15:06 520.208 0.65 107 92 93 2.21 2.18 25 45.0 48.0 15:18 522.880 0.31 109 94 94 1.06 1.04 24 48.0 51.0 15:21 524.705 0.57 109 94 94 1.95 1.91 23 51.0 54.0 15:24 527.100 0.68 109 94 94 2.33 2.28 22 54.0 57.0 15:27 529.650 0.65 109 94 94 2.23 2.18 21 57.0 60.0 15:30 532.120 0.31 107 94 94 1.06 1.04 25 60.0 63.0 15:40 534.200 0.31 109 96 94 1.06 1.1 24 63.0 66.0 15:43 536.030 0.50 109 96 94 1.72 1.7 23 66.0 69.0 15:46 538.300 0.40 109 96 94 1.38 1.4 22 69.0 72.0 15:49 540.495 0.42 109 96 94 1.45 1.5 21 72.0 75.0 15:52 542.635 0.44 109 96 94 1.52 1.5 2

75.0 15:55 544.875

Average: 56.02 0.48 108.0 93.5 93.3 1.62 1.61 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #15 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 24 11:00 11:01 0.000 @10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 3.0 13:52 13:12 0.001 @10"Source #31 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator JP Bws (%) 4.39 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 39.5 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9.4 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.29 Actual Dn (in) 0.254 O2 (%) 19.57 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2) 0.00035 CO2 (%) 0.06 Md 28.79 Stack Area (sf) 12.32

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.32 Act. Flow (cfm) 28,432 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 49.85 Preliminary dP (in H20) 0.46 Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 25,288

Moisture % 4.41 Preliminary Ts (oF) 100 Est. Us (ft/s) 39.5 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 24,177

Preliminary Tm (oF) 80 Theor Dn (in) 0.2507 Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 3.0 12:38 155.078 0.42 128 86 86 1.54 1.59 2

2 3.0 6.0 12:41 157.260 0.39 130 86 86 1.43 1.47 23 6.0 9.0 12:44 159.420 0.39 130 88 87 1.43 1.47 24 9.0 12.0 12:47 161.563 0.40 130 88 87 1.47 1.51 25 12.0 15.0 12:50 163.730 0.38 130 89 87 1.40 1.44 26 15.0 18.0 12:53 165.829 0.39 130 89 87 1.43 1.47 27 18.0 21.0 12:56 167.930 0.39 131 89 87 1.43 1.47 28 21.0 24.0 12:59 170.120 0.41 131 89 87 1.51 1.55 29 24.0 27.0 13:02 172.165 0.41 131 89 87 1.51 1.55 2

10 27.0 30.0 13:05 174.345 0.41 131 89 88 1.51 1.55 211 30.0 33.0 13:08 176.520 0.39 130 90 88 1.43 1.47 212 33.0 36.0 13:11 178.625 0.39 130 90 88 1.44 1.47 2

1 36.0 39.0 13:15 180.711 0.41 131 90 88 1.51 1.55 22 39.0 42.0 13:18 182.850 0.41 131 90 88 1.51 1.55 23 42.0 45.0 13:21 185.040 0.41 130 90 88 1.51 1.55 24 45.0 48.0 13:24 187.229 0.43 131 90 88 1.59 1.63 25 48.0 51.0 13:27 189.601 0.43 131 90 88 1.59 1.63 26 51.0 54.0 13:30 191.560 0.45 131 91 88 1.67 1.7 27 54.0 57.0 13:33 193.830 0.45 131 91 89 1.67 1.7 28 57.0 60.0 13:36 196.060 0.45 131 91 89 1.67 1.7 29 60.0 63.0 13:39 198.325 0.45 130 91 89 1.67 1.7 2

10 63.0 66.0 13:42 200.580 0.42 130 91 80 1.56 1.59 211 66.0 69.0 13:45 202.750 0.38 129 92 90 1.42 1.44 212 69.0 72.0 13:48 204.879 0.38 128 92 90 1.42 1.44 2

72.0 13:51 206.908

Average: 51.83 0.41 130.3 89.6 87.5 1.51 1.55 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # #57 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12 wcs Method 316 Total Points 60 14:03 14:04 0.0@10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 3.0 15:19 15:20 0.0@10"Source #31 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator JP Bws (%) 4.3 # of Ports 5 Total Run 180.0Filter Number NA Condensate Volume 38.7 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.76Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10.1 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.20 Actual Dn (in) 0.251 O2 (%) 19.44 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2) 0.00034 CO2 (%) 0.39 Md 28.84 Stack Area (sf) 12.32

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.37 Act. Flow (cfm) 29,896 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 241.81 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 135.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 26,574

Moisture % 0.94 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 25,420

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 3.0 14:05 207.039 0.45 131 91 92 1.59 1.62 2

2 3.0 6.0 14:08 209.390 0.45 130 92 92 1.59 1.62 23 6.0 9.0 14:11 211.440 0.45 130 93 92 1.59 1.62 24 9.0 12.0 14:14 213.668 0.45 130 92 92 1.59 1.62 25 12.0 15.0 14:17 215.805 0.48 130 92 92 1.69 1.73 26 15.0 18.0 14:20 218.070 0.48 131 93 92 1.69 1.73 27 18.0 21.0 14:23 220.379 0.48 131 94 92 1.69 1.93 28 21.0 24.0 14:26 222.660 0.50 131 94 93 1.76 1.8 29 24.0 27.0 14:29 224.925 0.50 130 94 93 1.76 1.8 2

10 27.0 30.0 14:32 227.220 0.50 131 93 93 1.76 1.8 211 30.0 33.0 14:35 229.460 0.39 130 92 92 1.38 1.4 212 33.0 36.0 14:38 231.540 0.39 130 92 92 1.38 1.4 2

1 36.0 39.0 14:42 233.542 0.39 131 92 92 1.38 1.4 22 39.0 42.0 14:45 235.550 0.39 131 92 92 1.38 1.4 23 42.0 45.0 14:48 237.630 0.39 131 93 92 1.38 1.4 24 45.0 48.0 14:51 239.675 0.39 132 93 92 1.38 1.4 25 48.0 51.0 14:54 241.750 0.39 132 92 92 1.39 1.4 26 51.0 54.0 14:57 243.871 0.40 132 92 91 1.42 1.44 27 54.0 57.0 15:00 245.900 0.55 131 92 91 1.96 1.98 28 57.0 60.0 15:03 248.365 0.55 131 92 91 1.96 1.98 29 60.0 63.0 15:06 250.765 0.50 131 93 91 1.79 1.80 2

10 63.0 66.0 15:09 252.940 0.50 131 93 91 1.79 1.80 211 66.0 69.0 15:12 255.309 0.50 130 93 91 1.79 1.80 212 69.0 72.0 15:15 257.632 0.45 130 93 91 1.61 1.62 2

72.0 15:18 259.772

Average: 52.73 0.46 130.8 92.6 91.8 1.61 1.65 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.18 Probe # 15 Pollutant FormaldehydePoints/Port 12 Start Finish Pre P

Company Johns Manville DGM # 12WCS Method 316 Total Points 24 15:25 15:26 0.0@10"

Location Willows, CA Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 4 Time/pt (min) 3.0 16:44 16:45 0.0@10"Source #31 Delta ∆H@ 1.717 Date 12-Oct-10 Time/reading 3.0Operator VP Bws (%) 5.5 # of Ports 2 Total Run 72.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 52.4 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.75Barometric 29.77 Silica Gel Weight Gain 10.3 DGM Y 1.005 Pm (in Hg) 29.77 Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O) -0.23 Actual Dn (in) 0.254 O2 (%) 19.38 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.96 An (ft^2) 0.00035 CO2 (%) 0.39 Md 28.84 Stack Area (sf) 12.32

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.24 Act. Flow (cfm) 28,951 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 292.29 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 54.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 25,686

Moisture % 1.00 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 24,264

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

1 0.0 3.0 15:30 260.25 0.35 132 91 91 1.26 1.32 2

2 3.0 6.0 15:33 262.14 0.35 132 91 91 1.26 1.32 23 6.0 9.0 15:36 264.18 0.38 133 92 91 1.37 1.44 24 9.0 12.0 15:39 266.20 0.38 132 92 91 1.37 1.44 25 12.0 15.0 15:42 268.44 0.38 133 92 91 1.37 1.44 26 15.0 18.0 15:45 270.53 0.38 133 93 91 1.37 1.44 27 18.0 21.0 15:48 272.64 0.42 133 93 91 1.52 1.59 28 21.0 24.0 15:51 274.79 0.53 132 94 92 1.92 2 29 24.0 27.0 15:54 277.11 0.50 131 93 91 1.81 1.89 2

10 27.0 30.0 15:57 279.42 0.50 131 92 91 1.81 1.89 211 30.0 33.0 16:00 281.83 0.42 130 92 91 1.52 1.59 212 33.0 36.0 16:03 284.10 0.42 130 93 91 1.52 1.59 2

1 36.0 39.0 16:07 286.19 0.42 132 93 92 1.52 1.59 22 39.0 42.0 16:10 288.40 0.42 132 93 92 1.52 1.59 23 42.0 45.0 16:13 290.53 0.45 132 93 92 1.64 1.7 24 45.0 48.0 16:16 292.71 0.45 132 94 92 1.64 1.7 25 48.0 51.0 16:19 294.95 0.42 132 93 92 1.53 1.59 26 51.0 54.0 16:22 297.17 0.42 132 94 92 1.53 1.59 27 54.0 57.0 16:25 299.36 0.42 132 94 92 1.53 1.59 28 57.0 60.0 16:28 301.55 0.42 132 93 92 1.54 1.59 29 60.0 63.0 16:31 303.75 0.42 132 93 91 1.54 1.59 2

10 63.0 66.0 16:34 306.04 0.38 132 93 92 1.39 1.55 211 66.0 69.0 16:37 308.07 0.49 131 92 91 1.80 1.85 212 69.0 72.0 16:40 310.39 0.45 130 92 91 1.65 1.7 2

72.0 16:43 312.68

Average: 52.44 0.42 131.8 92.7 91.4 1.54 1.61 2

Leak Check



























































































APPENDIX D 

Equipment Calibration 

Documents 

































APPENDIX E 

Laboratory Analytical 

Reports 

























Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

(mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Filterable 

PM2.5 Catch 

Weight (mg)

Organic 

PM2.5 Cat

Weight (m

Run 1 13 0.5 0.60 4.7 33 0.90 5 Run 2 14 ND 0.30 6 21 0.60 6 Run 3 16 0.5 0.30 4.2 34 0.60 4 

Blank: 20 0.50 0.30 ND 1.8

RDL: 1 0.3 0.50

Corrected

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results Blank Correction

Johns-Manville

Willows, California - Stack 27

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Sampling Date: October 18-19, 2010

OTM27 OTM28
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight (mg)

Run 1 97 1.9 ND 1.9 2.2

Run 2 93 2.4 0.30 2.4 2.7

Run 3 96 2.8 ND 2.8 3.1

Blank 98 ND

RDL 1 0.5 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Date: October 19, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Willows, California - Stack 27

Johns-Manville
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

RDL 

(μg)

R1 

Result

(μg)

R2 

Result

(μg)

R3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit (RDL)

(μg)

R1

(μg)

R2 

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 0.80 0.80 

Arsenic 0.47 0.40 17.0 20.0 21.7 0.80 16.5 19.5 

Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Cadmium ND 0.10 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.20 0.56 0.53 

Chromium 0.92 0.30 1.64 1.64 2.75 0.60 0.72 0.72 

Cobalt ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 0.20 0.20 

Lead 1.65 0.20 2.12 1.48 3.09 0.40 0.47 0.40 

Manganese ND 0.75 ND ND ND 1.5 1.5 1.5 

Nickel 0.94 0.50 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 

Selenium ND 1.0 19.5 23.9 25.5 2.0 19.5 23.9 

Johns-Manville

Method 29 Lab Results Blank Correction

Corrected

Sampling Date: October 19, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Willows, California - Stack 27
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Run 1 810 300 1.2 0.4 0.40

Run 2 810 300 0.9 0.4 0.40 

Run 3 880 300 1.2 0.4 0.40

Blank H2O 97 ND 0.05

Blank KOH 300 0.80 0.20

Method 0061 Lab Results Blank Correction

Sampling Date: October 18, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Willows, California - Stack 27

Johns-Manville
Volume (mL)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrofluoric 

Acid (μg)

Hydrochloric 

Acid (μg)

Hyd

Ac

Run 1 320 ND ND 200 Run 2 310 ND ND 200 Run 3 290 ND ND 200 

Blank H20 100 ND ND

Blank H2SO4 200 ND ND

RDL 200 200

Corrected

Method 26A Lab Results Blank Correction

Johns-Manville

Willows, California - Stack 27

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Sampling Date: October 14 & 15, 2010
Volume 

[ml]

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Methanol 

[μg] RDL

Phenol 

[μg] RDL

Formaldehyde 

[μg]

Metha

[μg

Blank UFDI 300 ND - -

Run 1 470 690 29 4 ND 6 690 29 

Run 2 450 630 27 4 ND 6 630 27 Run 3 440 510 33 4 19 6 510 33 Run 1 550 510 19 4 ND 6 510 19 Run 2 500 540 16 4 ND 6 540 16 Run 3 470 440 23 4 ND 6 440 23 Run 1 430 320 19 4 ND 6 320 19 Run 2 480 350 25 4 12 6 350 25 Run 3 440 360 20 4 ND 6 360 20 

Run 1 470 4800 36 4 ND 6 4800 36 Run 2 440 4700 40 4 ND 6 4700 40 Run 3 460 5000 35 4 ND 6 5000 35 

Method 316 Lab Results Blank Correction

Corre

Sampling Date: October 11 & 12, 2010

BTEC job # 10-3990.18

Willows, California - Stack 27

Johns-Manville

Stack 28Stack 29Stack 30Stack 31
Site: JM WILLOWS

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/22

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1917

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/17 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/11/13 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/11/13 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 1 2 H V 0 3 1 3 H V 0 3 1 4 H V 0 3 1 5 H V 0 3 1 8

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14 2010/10/14

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN R1-OTM28 R2-OTM28 R3-OTM28 TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.5 0.5 2327442

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 0.30 2328288

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 20 1 2327445

Weight g 120 170 160 180 0.1 2327902

DCM Weight g 270 190 220 160 0.1 2327899

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.8 33 21 34 0.50 2332125

Organic Condensible PM mg ND 4.7 6.0 4.2 1.0 2327894

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 1 9 H V 0 3 2 0 H V 0 3 2 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/13 2010/10/13 2010/10/14

COC Number

 U n i t s R1-OTM27 R2-OTM27 R3-OTM27 RDL QC Batch

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.5 ND 0.5 0.5 2327442

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.60 0.30 0.30 0.30 2328288

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 13 14 16 1 2327445

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0312 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0313 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0314 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0315 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID R3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2327894 2010/11/13 2010/11/13 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2332125 2010/11/17 2010/11/17 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2327899 N/A 2010/11/13 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2327902 N/A 2010/11/13 FMO

Maxxam ID HV0318 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0319 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0320 Collected 2010/10/13

Sample ID R2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0321 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID R3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2328288 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2327442 2010/11/11 2010/11/22 NUA

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327445 N/A 2010/11/17 NUA

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1917

Report Date: 2010/11/22 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HV0312-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0313-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0314-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HV0315-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Brownish yellow oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish residue found in aluminum dish.

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0318-01RNormal

HV0319-01RFT

HV0320-01RNormal

HV0321-01RDE/LFT

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

DE Edges of the filter are frayed

FT Filter torn

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1917

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327442 NUA Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/11/22 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2327894 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 92 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 95 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 2.7 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/11/13 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2332125 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/11/17 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6
Site: JM WILLOWS

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/23

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0G1932

Received: 2010/11/10, 12:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/11/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/11/16 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 9 7 H V 0 3 9 8 H V 0 4 0 0 H V 0 4 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 1.9 2.4 2.8 0.5 2327435

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg ND ND 0.30 ND 0.30 2328304

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 98 97 93 96 1 2327436

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H V 0 3 9 7 H V 0 3 9 8 H V 0 4 0 0 H V 0 4 0 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20 2010/10/20

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND 0.80 2334727

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.47 0.40 17.0 20.0 21.7 0.80 2334727

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 0.56 0.53 1.41 0.20 2334727

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.92 0.30 1.64 1.64 2.75 0.60 2334727

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.20 2334727

Total Lead (Pb) ug 1.65 0.20 2.12 1.48 3.09 0.40 2334727

Total Manganese (Mn) ug ND 0.75 ND ND ND 1.5 2334727

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.94 0.50 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.0 2334727

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 19.5 23.9 25.5 2.0 2334727

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HV0397 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0398 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0400 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Maxxam ID HV0401 Collected 2010/10/20

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/11/10

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2334727 2010/11/19 2010/11/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2327435 2010/11/11 2010/11/18 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2328304 N/A 2010/11/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2327436 N/A 2010/11/16 NUA

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0G1932

Report Date: 2010/11/23 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Maxxam # Filter Condition

HV0397-01RNormal

HV0398-01RLFT

HV0400-01RNormal

HV0401-01RNormal

Normal Filters received in normal condition

LFT Loose filter material in the petri dish

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 2x or 5x dilution was required for all samples except HV0283, HV0397 and HV1280, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HV1281.

Trace level As was observed in the Processed Blank.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1932

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2327435 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/11/18 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2334727 N_R Matrix Spike Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 93 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 2.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 1.0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 4.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 96 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 3.1 % 20

Matrix Spike Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 94 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 1.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 0.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 0.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 98 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 0.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 96 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 95 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 0.5 % 20

Page 6 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0G1932

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2334727 N_R Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 0.07 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.63, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 0.65, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/11/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 7
Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental110210 Report 1 (2 of 2)

Date

Contact Name Phone

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

80487 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 532 0.1 10/13/2010 Run 1, Trap A

80427 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 531 0.6 20 10/13/2010 Run 1, Trap B

80477 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 436 0.2 10/13/2010 Run 2, Trap A

80431 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 449 0.4 20 10/13/2010 Run 2, Trap B

80488 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 461 0.7 10/14/2010 Run 3, Trap A

80397 027 Melter 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 499 0.4 20 10/14/2010 Run 3, Trap B

80495 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 0.6 0.5 Blank

80457 11/1/2010 Veronica Bucks 20 0.5 20 Blank

Variability +- 10%

Plant/Source JM Willows 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

11/2/2010

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .52 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Calibration Report Available

(248)-548-8072 
Site: JM WILLOWS

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/12/01

This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8439

Received: 2010/10/20, 11:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/11/01 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/23 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 2 H O 1 6 0 3 H O 1 6 0 4 H O 1 6 0 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/15 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/14

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 100 200 320 1 2316213

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2316215

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2316215

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 5 H O 1 6 0 6 H O 1 6 0 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 2010/10/14

COC Number N/A N/A

 U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 310 290 2316213 97 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.05 2307267

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND 2316215 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2316215 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 6 0 8 H O 1 6 0 9 H O 1 6 0 9 H O 1 6 1 0 H O 1 6 1 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 2010/10/15 2010/10/15

COC Number

 U n i t s BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 300 1 810 810 880 1 2307272

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.8 0.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.4 2307267

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1602 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1603 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1604 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1604 D u p Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1605 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Maxxam ID HO1606 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2316215 2010/11/01 2010/11/01 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2316213 N/A 2010/11/01 A_S

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1607 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1608 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1609 Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1609 D u p Collected 2010/10/14

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HO1610 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1611 Collected 2010/10/15

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2307267 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2307272 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8439

Report Date: 2010/12/01 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL COMMENTS

Temperature of samples upon receipt >6°C.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8439

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307267 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1609) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 106 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 105 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/23 NC % 20

2316215 A_S Matrix Spike

(HO1604) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 101 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 103 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 99 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 101 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/11/01 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/11/01 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6
Site: JM WILLOWS

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/11/05

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0E8493

Received: 2010/10/20, 23:30

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 26

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Formaldehylde (M316) 13 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 BRL SOP-00113 EPA 316 

Final Volume of Impinger 13 N/A 2010/10/23 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) (1 ) 13 N/A 2010/10/25 BRL SOP-00211 NCASI WP99.01mod 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) C

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 5 1 H O 1 8 5 2 H O 1 8 5 2 H O 1 8 5 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

 U n i t s RB-H2O-M316 RDL R1-FORM-28-M316 R1-FORM-28-M316 RDL R2-FORM-28-M316 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Formaldehyde ug ND 7.5 690 690 23 630 11 2307269

Volume ml 300 1 470 1 450 1 2307270

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 6 4 H O 1 8 6 5 H O 1 8 6 6 H O 1 8 6 7

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

 U n i t s R3-FORM-28-M316 RDL R1-FORM-29-M316 RDL R2-FORM-29-M316 RDL R3-FORM-29-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 510 11 510 14 540 13 440 12 2307269

Volume ml 440 1 550 1 500 1 470 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 6 8 H O 1 8 6 9 H O 1 8 7 0 H O 1 8 7 1

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

 U n i t s R1-FORM-30-M316 RDL R2-FORM-30-M316 RDL R3-FORM-30-M316 RDL R2-FORM-31-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 320 11 350 12 360 11 4800 59 2307269

Volume ml 430 1 480 1 440 1 470 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 7 2 H O 1 8 7 3

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

 U n i t s R3-FORM-31-M316 RDL R4-FORM-31-M316 RDL QC Batch

Formaldehyde ug 4700 55 5000 58 2307269

Volume ml 440 1 460 1 2307270

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

MISCELLANEOUS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 3 0 H O 1 8 3 2 H O 1 8 3 2 H O 1 8 3 3 H O 1 8 3 4

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11

 U n i t s RB-DI VOA R1-FORM-28-VOA R1-FORM-28-VOA R2-FORM-28-VOA R3-FORM-28-VOA RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Methanol ug ND 29 26 27 33 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 19 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 3 5 H O 1 8 3 6 H O 1 8 3 7 H O 1 8 3 8 H O 1 8 3 9

Sampling Date 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

 U n i t s R1-FORM-29-VOA R2-FORM-29-VOA R3-FORM-29-VOA R1-FORM-30-VOA R2-FORM-30-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 19 16 23 19 25 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 12 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H O 1 8 4 0 H O 1 8 4 1 H O 1 8 4 5 H O 1 8 4 6

Sampling Date 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12 2010/10/12

 U n i t s R3-FORM-30-VOA R2-FORM-31-VOA R3-FORM-31-VOA R4-FORM-31-VOA RDL QC Batch

Methanol ug 20 36 40 35 4 2307386

Phenol ug ND ND ND ND 6 2307386

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1830 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID RB-DI VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1832 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1832 D u p Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1833 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1834 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-28-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1835 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1836 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Page 4 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1837 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-29-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1838 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R1-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1839 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1840 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-30-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1841 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1845 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Maxxam ID HO1846 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R4-FORM-31-VOA Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NCASI WP99.01) GC/FID 2307386 N/A 2010/10/25 LTO

Page 5 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1851 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID RB-H2O-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1852 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1852 D u p Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Maxxam ID HO1854 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1864 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-28-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1865 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R1-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 6 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1866 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R2-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1867 Collected 2010/10/11

Sample ID R3-FORM-29-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1868 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R1-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1869 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1870 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-30-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1871 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R2-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 7 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HO1872 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R3-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Maxxam ID HO1873 Collected 2010/10/12

Sample ID R4-FORM-31-M316 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/20

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Formaldehylde (M316) /SPEC 2307269 2010/10/23 2010/10/23 LLE

Final Volume of Impinger 2307270 N/A 2010/10/23 FMO

Page 8 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0E8493

Report Date: 2010/11/05 Project name: JM WILLOWS

GENERAL COMMENTS

Sample HO1830-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1832-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1833-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1834-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1835-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1836-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1837-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1838-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1839-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1840-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1841-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1845-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Sample HO1846-01: MDLs adjusted for volume received. V=43 ml

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 9 of 10
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #:

P.O. #:

Project name: JM WILLOWS

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0E8493

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2307269 LLE Matrix Spike

(HO1852) Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 99 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 99 % 91 - 107

Method Blank Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 ND, RDL=7.5 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Formaldehyde 2010/10/23 0.9 % 20

2307386 LTO Matrix Spike Methanol 2010/10/25 80 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 93 % N/A

Spiked Blank Methanol 2010/10/25 85 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 92 % N/A

Method Blank Methanol 2010/10/25 ND, RDL=50 ug

Phenol 2010/10/25 ND, RDL=6 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Methanol 2010/10/25 10.9 % N/A

Phenol 2010/10/25 NC % 50

N/A = Not Applicable

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 10 of 10