alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ami Trauber, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. By: STAR GAS LLC (General
Partner)January 21, 2002





By:

/s/    AMI TRAUBERAmi Trauber Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1719 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1719

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire approximately 44 
 acres of land in Martinez, California, for inclusion in the John Muir 
             National Historic Site, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``John Muir National Historic Site 
Expansion Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
    In this Act:
        (1) Historic site.--The term ``Historic Site'' means the John 
    Muir National Historic Site in Martinez, California, established by 
    Public Law 88-547 (78 Stat. 753).
        (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``John Muir 
    National Historic Site Proposed Boundary Expansion'', numbered 426/
    127150, and dated November 2014.
        (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior.
SEC. 3. JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE LAND ACQUISITION.
    (a) Acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire by donation the 
approximately 44 acres of land and any interests in the land that is 
identified on the map.
    (b) Boundary.--On the acquisition of the land authorized under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall adjust the boundaries of the 
Historic Site to include the acquired land.
    (c) Administration.--The land and any interests in land acquired 
under subsection (a) shall be administered as part of the National 
Historic Site.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
 
 
 Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, John L. Petersen, chief accounting officer of Win or Lose Acquisition Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:
 
 The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ John L. Petersen
 John L. Petersen, Chief Accounting Officer Dated: March 29, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases

# NRC To Meet With USEC Officials April 26 To Discuss Shutdown of Enrichment Operations at the Portsmouth Plant

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, February 04, 2021
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1403 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto 

Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico (for herself, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO 

4 DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES IN 

5 PUERTO RICO MADE PERMANENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 199(d)(8) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara8 graph (C). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1403 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NEXRF CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PLAYTIKA LTD., PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP., 

CAESARS INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2021-2147

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Nevada in No. 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB, Judge 

Miranda M. Du.

---------------------------------------------------

NEXRF CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD., 

PRODUCT MADNESS INC, BIG FISH GAMES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2021-2219

Case: 21-2147 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 05/13/2022
______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Nevada in No. 2:21-cv-00798-RSM, Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

EUGENE LEDONNE, Haug Partners LLP, New York, 

NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant NexRF Corp. Also represented by JONATHAN HERSTOFF; CHRISTOPHER GOSSELIN, 

Washington, DC. 

 ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett 

& Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp. also represented by FORREST 

ALEXANDER JONES, ANDREA GRACE KLOCK MILLS, GERSON 

PANITCH, CHRISTINA JI-HYE YANG. 

 RICARDO BONILLA, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, 

for defendant-appellee Caesars Interactive Entertainment. 

Also represented by NEIL J. MCNABNAY, LANCE E. WYATT,

JR. 

 RICHARD L. RAINEY, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Aristocrat International Pty. Ltd., Product Madness Inc, Big Fish Games, Inc. 

Also represented by GARY RUBMAN, PETER ANDREW 

SWANSON. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 21-2147 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 05/13/2022
 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

May 13, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2147 Document: 55 Page: 3 Filed: 05/13/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO OF ATARI, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atari, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruno Bonnell,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                          By: /s/ Bruno Bonnell
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Bruno Bonnell
                                          Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 8, 2003

                                     Page 33
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Cycle 36.04, Against the Loviisa–2 Stuck-Open Turbine By-Pass Valve Transient on September 1, 1981 (NUREG/IA–0047)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA–0047 (PDF 4.67 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 1992

**Prepared by:** Vesa Yrjola

Technical Research Centre of Finland Nuclear Engineering Laboratory P.O. Box 169 SF–00181 Helsinki, Finland

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An overcooling type transient that took place in the LOVIISA Unit 2 has been analyzed using the RELAP5/MOD2 code. The code version was cycle 36.04.

The Loviisa Power Plant consists of two Soviet VVER-440 type pressurized water reactors having a net electric output of 445 MWe each. In VVER-440 reactors, the primary circuit comprises six parallel loops, each with a horizontal steam generator, a main circulation pump and main loop isolation gate valves. The reactor has significant differences compared to a typical western PWR, such as loop seals both in the hot and cold leg and horizontal steam generators.

The transient that occurred on September 1, 1981 was initiated from full power by a reactor trip. Incorrect operation of the level gauges in four steam generators caused the trip signal. An associated stuck-open failure of one turbine by-pass valve caused a fast cool-down. The high pressure safety injection started to operate, but was quickly turned off by the operator. The downcomer temperature decreased from 265 °C to 215 °C in fifteen minutes. The cooling down ceased when the operator closed the shut-off valve of the open by-pass line.

Although the plant data are not gathered as comprehensively as those from the extensively instrumented test facilities, the real plant transients are important in order to verify the scaling capability of the current one-dimensional codes to large three-dimensional power plants. The transient data together with the start-up commissioning tests also form a good data base when the applicability of the nodalization model for accident analysis is tested.

This work was performed at the Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) in co-operation with the utility Imatran Voima Oy (IVO), which owns and operates these plants. Many people in both organizations have contributed to the work and their support and assistance is acknowledged.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO RODRIGUEZ DELOYA; IRMA

RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71120

Agency Nos. A096-344-306

 A096-344-307

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Rodriguez Deloya and Irma Rodriguez, both natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is

FILED

SEP 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71120

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial

of a motion to reopen and for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual determinations

made in the course of the decision. Nehad v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 962, 966-67

(9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen, where petitioners filed the motion more than five years after issuance of

the BIA’s final order of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), and petitioners

did not demonstrate that they had received ineffective assistance of counsel during

their appeal to the BIA such as would warrant equitable tolling of the filing

deadline applicable to motions to reopen, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889,

898 (9th Cir. 2003) (holding that “equitable tolling is available” only if “the

ineffective performance” of an alien’s attorney caused “an essential action in her

client’s case to be undertaken ineffectively, out of time, or not at all”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ contentions that their case

warrants a favorable exercise of prosecutorial discretion, see Vilchiz-Soto v.

Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order), and that the BIA abused its

discretion by declining to reopen their case sua sponte, see Mejia-Hernandez v.

Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011).
3 11-71120

To the extent petitioners contend that the BIA failed to provide a reasoned

explanation for its denial of their motion, the contention is unpersuasive because

the BIA identified specific, cogent reasons for its decision. See Movsisian v.

Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005).

Finally, because the foregoing determinations are dispositive of the present

petition for review, we decline to consider Rodriguez Deloya’s contention that an

intervening change in the law has rendered him statutorily eligible for cancellation

of removal. See Mendez-Alcaraz v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 842, 844 (9th Cir. 2006)

(declining to reach nondispositive challenges to a BIA order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Finds Performance 'Acceptable' at Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant in Latest Review

----

----

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: No. III-99-12 March 31, 1999

 

**NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE 'ACCEPTABLE' AT PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN LATEST REVIEW**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains acceptable in the NRC's latest plant performance review at the Prairie Island nuclear power plant, located in Red Wing, Minnesota.

The review covers March 28 of last year through January 31.

Geoffrey Grant, NRC Region III Division Director, in a letter to Northern States Power Company, said:

"Overall, performance at the Prairie Island Nuclear Plant was acceptable...Maintenance and surveillance testing activities were generally conducted in an appropriate manner, but procedure adherence and work control problems persist from the previous assessment period...In the area of engineering, except for degraded control rod drive cables on the Unit 1 reactor head, equipment material condition remained excellent and safety system reliability/availability remained very high...In the area of operations, performance was consistent. Operator performance in response to several reactor transients (including four reactor trips) and during a refueling outage was very good."

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region III Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.’s 333-119633,333-110292 and S-8 (No.’s 333-121376, 333-98911, 333-84676, 333-84678) of Mykrolis Corporation of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

**/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**

Boston, Massachusetts 

**April 13, 2005**
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Analysis of LOBI Test BLO2 (Three Percent Cold Leg Break) with RELAP5 Code (NUREG/IA-0036)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0036 (PDF 2.57 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** March 1992

**Prepared by:** A.H. Scriven

Central Electricity Generating Board Technology Planning and Research Division Central Electricity Research Laboratories Kelvin Avenue Leatherhead Surrey KT2275E United Kingdom

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The test BL02 was a UK specified test conducted on the electrically heated 2 loop test system at Ispra, North Italy as part of the LOBI 'B' series of tests sponsored by the Joint European Research Commission.

The pretest calculations for this test were performed with the RELAP5 MOD1 code, and the post-test analysis was carried out using RELAP5 MOD2. Comparisons between the codes predictions and the test data are given, and for the case of the post-test MOD2 calculation, detailed studies of the codes performance in a number of areas are included.

Of particular note in this test is the stratified break offtake condition for part of the test, the sensitivity to accurate bypass modelling and the clearance of both loop seals early in the transient. The correct modelling of these inter-related effects is a good test for the code.

This test also benefits from a reliable and accurate break mass flow measurement system, installed since the International Standard Problem (ISP18) test, which enables better determination of the boundary conditions of the test.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94778-94779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 477 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 94779]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-469, K2025-466.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27936 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9009]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Staging the Ukrainian Avant-Garde of the 1910s and 
1920s'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Staging the Ukrainian Avant-Garde of the 
1910s and 1920s,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Ukrainian Museum, New York, NY, from on or about 
February 7, 2015, until on or about September 13, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-00899 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P