alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 130 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 

Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED. 

4 (a) REAFFIRMATION.—Section 19 of the Act of June 

5 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

6 Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), is amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 130 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

3 term’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

5 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in6 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian tribe’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

9 the following: ‘‘In said sections, the term ‘Indian 

10 tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, 

11 band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the 

12 Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an 

13 Indian tribe.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall take effect as if included in the Act of 

16 June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorga17 nization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of enactment 

18 of that Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Excellence Mortgage, /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 25, 2014

No. 04-13-00106-CV

Barry BROOKS, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez 

Benavides,

Appellants

v.

EXCELLENCE MORTGAGE, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-01173

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee Excellence Mortgage’s Motion to Strike Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is 

DENIED. Appellants’ Motion for Leave to Exceed Word Limit is hereby GRANTED.

Additionally, Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file a response to Appellants’ Motion 

for Rehearing is GRANTED. Appellee’s response is due to be filed no later than October 20, 

2014.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,916                   5,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,067                  11,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,352                   4,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,580                  21,580
<PP&E>                                           1,196                   1,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,382                  23,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,632                   6,632
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        39,506                  39,506
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,382                  23,382
<SALES>                                          9,391                  20,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,391                  20,699
<CGS>                                            5,263                  12,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,263                  12,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,126                   8,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2                       3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,052                   (418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50                      52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,002                   (470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,002                   (470)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12                  (0.06)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1512 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1512

    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
  reissuance of Social Security account numbers to young children in 
           cases where confidentiality has been compromised.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2017

Mr. Marchant (for himself, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Smith of Missouri, and Mr. 
 Blumenauer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
  reissuance of Social Security account numbers to young children in 
           cases where confidentiality has been compromised.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Child Protection Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS TO YOUNG CHILDREN 
              IN CASES WHERE CONFIDENTIALITY HAS BEEN COMPROMISED.

    Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
405(c)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new 
        clause:
    ``(iii) In any case in which a Social Security account number has 
been issued to a child who has not attained the age of 14 pursuant to 
subclause (IV) or (V) of clause (i) and it is demonstrated by evidence, 
as determined by the Commissioner of Social Security, and submitted 
under penalty of perjury to the Commissioner by a parent or guardian of 
the child that in the course of transmission of documentation of such 
number to the child, the confidentiality of such number has been 
compromised by reason of theft of such documentation, the Commissioner 
shall issue a new Social Security account number to such child and make 
note in the records maintained with respect to such child of the 
pertinent information received by the Commissioner regarding the theft 
of the documentation of the original number.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1662 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1662

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking in any 
facility of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2017

 Mr. Wenstrup introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking in any 
facility of the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN FACILITIES OF THE VETERANS HEALTH 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 1715 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans 
              Health Administration
    ``(a) Prohibition.--(1) No person may smoke indoors in any facility 
of the Veterans Health Administration.
    ``(2) No person may smoke outdoors in any facility of the Veterans 
Health Administration on or after October 1, 2022.
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) The term `smoke' includes the smoking of cigarettes 
        (including e-cigarettes or electronic cigarettes), cigars, 
        pipes, and any other combustion of tobacco.
            ``(2) The term `facility of the Veterans Health 
        Administration' means any land or building (including any 
        medical center, nursing home, domiciliary facility, outpatient 
        clinic, or center that provides readjustment counseling) that 
        is--
                    ``(A) under the jurisdiction of the Department of 
                Veterans Affairs;
                    ``(B) under the control of the Veterans Health 
                Administration; and
                    ``(C) not under the control of the General Services 
                Administration.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 17 of 
        such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 
        1715 and inserting the following:

``1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.''.
            (2) Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 
        (Public Law 102-585) is repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
In The Matter Of: 

COMAIR, INC. 

Respondent 

SERVED: OCTOBER 1, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DocketNo. FAA-2014-0318 

Case No. 2011S0271015 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On August 14, 2014, an Order Setting Rule 16litigation Scheduling Conference and 

Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. This Order set the Rule 16 Litigation 

Scheduling Conference for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time, and set October 1, 2014, 

as the deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan. · 

On September 30, 2014, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal of Request for Hearing and 

Answer, stating that the parties have reached a settlement and requesting that this proceeding be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant case law, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The October 1, 2014 deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan is 

cancelled. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 

·. i' 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

· Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Robert P. Silverberg 

Respondent's Counsel 

llOl 30th Street, N.W. Suite 120 

Washington, DC 20007 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0318 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL QUARTER TO MARCH 31, 1997 AS PRESENTED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          1,541,142
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,065,175
<ALLOWANCES>                       71,913
<INVENTORY>                     2,816,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,077,211
<PP&E>                          1,156,916
<DEPRECIATION>                    428,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,935,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,568,774
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                            25
<COMMON>                              847
<OTHER-SE>                      5,366,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,935,493
<SALES>                         4,487,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,487,535
<CGS>                           3,259,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   6,563,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  125,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,950,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,950,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,950,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-11065 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAROLD ELLSWORTH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CR-30-1-Y

--------------------

April 10, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Darold Ellsworth appeals his sentence of 139 months’

imprisonment and three years’ supervised release after pleading

guilty to possession of Ephedrin with intent to manufacture

methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred by

increasing his offense level based on the quantity of drugs and

his possession of a weapon.

This court specifically rejected Ellsworth’s argument that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) rendered 21 U.S.C. 
No. 01-11065

-2-

§ 841(b) facially unconstitutional. United States v. Slaughter,

238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). Apprendi is not authority for

invalidating Ellsworth’s sentence for the additional reason that

Ellsworth’s sentence of 139 months’ imprisonment and three years’

supervised release does not exceed the statutory maximum of

twenty years provided in 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(1). United States v.

Keith, 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000) (“[A] fact used in

sentencing that does not increase a penalty beyond the statutory

maximum need not be alleged in the indictment and proved to a

jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”)

As the Government correctly points out, Ellsworth’s sentence

was not determined based on drug quantity and weapon possession

as he contends. Ellsworth was determined to be a career

offender, and his offense level was determined based on the

career offender provisions of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, making

Ellsworth’s arguments on appeal irrelevant.

AFFIRMED.
No. D-595.

#### In re Disbarment of Hartman.

Ronald L. Hartman, of Encino, Cal., having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The rule to show cause, heretofore issued on January 12, 1987 *[ante,*p. 1025], is hereby discharged.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 103/16/2015 17:42:43

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Peach Bottom 3 Docket (050- 00278)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 

160 - No communication / information not communicated A - Administrative Support A - Administrative 

211

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

146 - Evaluation LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

317

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements E - Electrical G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical G - Design 197 - Self-check LTA Z - Other / Unknown R - Refueling 

1267

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 18
Order entered December 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01041-CV

No. 05-15-01042-CV

No. 05-15-01043-CV

No. 05-15-01044-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D.W., Z.J.W., J.Q.W., J.W., AND M.I.B.

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. DF-10-13224-U; DF-13-18933-U; DF-14-10757-U; DF-13-18931-U

ORDER

The State’s December 7, 2015 motion to extend the time for filing a brief is GRANTED, 

and the time is extended until December 18, 2015.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report") by Ames National Corporation (the "Company"),
the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 13th
day of March, 2009.
 
 
 /s/JohnP.NelsonJohn
      P. Nelson, Vice President(Principal
      Financial
Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00525

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF F.A.M., JR

. , a Child

From the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA01301

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal

because she qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.

SIGNED June 9, 2021.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Tu Nguyen V. Bank of America, N.A.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00587-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-64308

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: December 14, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting for the Court’s panel

Panel consists of: Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd 

A majority of the panel voted to deny the motion for rehearing.

Date: December 22, 2016