alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1450 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1450

  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2017

  Mr. Issa (for himself, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. 
   Curbelo of Florida, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, and Mr. Deutch) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Stolen Trademarks Honored in 
America Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION.

    Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of division A 
of Public Law 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-88) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``by a designated national''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``that was used 
                in connection with a business or assets that were 
                confiscated unless the original owner of the mark, 
                trade name, or commercial name, or the bonafide 
                successor-in-interest has expressly consented'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``by a designated 
        national or its successor-in-interest'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
            (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only 
if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason to know 
at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights asserted that 
the mark, trade name, or commercial name was the same as or 
substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name that 
was used in connection with a business or assets that were 
confiscated.''; and
            (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``In 
        this section:'' and all that follows through ``(2) The term'' 
        and inserting ``In this section, the term''.
                                 <all>
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,141-01

EX P ARTE EVER RICARDO MA RTINEZ, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W366-84380-2019-HC IN THE 366T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to forty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. He filed th i s ap p l i cation for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to an appea l beca use counsel failed to timely file a n otice of appea l. The trial court has found that Applicant was denied his right to appea l throug h no fault of his own. This finding is supported by the rec ord, which shows that trial counsel failed to file an appea l on Applicant’s behalf , despite Applicant expressly reque sting them to do so. Relief is g rante d. Ex parte Ax el , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appea l of his conviction2

in cause number 366-84380-2019 from the 366th District Court of Colli n County

. Wit hin ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him on direc t appea l. Should Applica nt de cide to appea l, he must file a written notice of appe al in the trial cour t within thi rty

day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Co p ie s o f this o p in io n shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre cti o n a l Institut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 3, 2021 Do not publish
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27919]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 761 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-452, K2025-449.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27919 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
No. 91-5771.

#### Wade *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         165,068
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    10,990,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,309,402
<PP&E>                                         3,437
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,312,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,838,361
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     474,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,312,889
<SALES>                                        15,722,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,730,966
<CGS>                                          14,039,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,039,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,276,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                415,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            415,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   415,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases2000

# NRC to Meet With USEC Officials November 13 to Discuss Planned Portsmouth Plant Closure

----

----

**NRC TO MEET WITH USEC OFFICIALS NOVEMBER 13 TO DISCUSS PLANNED PORTSMOUTH PLANT CLOSURE**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with U.S. Enrichment Corporation officials November 13 in Piketon, Ohio, to discuss the company's plans for shutting down uranium enrichment activities at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant by June 2001. Officials also will discuss the company's progress concerning gas centrifuge enrichment technology.

NRC and company officials have been meeting periodically to discuss the projected closure.

The meeting will be at 2 p.m. EST at the XT-801 South Office Building at the plant in room 123. The plant is located at 3930 U.S. Route 23 in Piketon. The meeting is open for public observation, although participation is limited to the NRC and USEC management personnel. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting for questions and comments from members of the public.

USEC announced in June that production would continue at both the Portsmouth plant and the Paducah, Kentucky, Gaseous Diffusion Plant until June 2001. By that date, USEC anticipates it will cease enrichment operations at the Portsmouth plant, after having upgraded the Paducah plant to produce enriched uranium for use as fuel in nuclear power plants. The NRC staff is currently reviewing the proposed Paducah upgrade. 

NRC staff, including the resident inspectors at the Portsmouth plant, will continue to monitor plant safety activities until regulatory oversight is transferred from the NRC to the Department of Energy. USEC officials have said they anticipated that transfer would occur by June 2002. USEC would continue to operate the Portsmouth product transfer facility over the next four or five years until a similar facility would become available at Paducah.

Directions to the plant:

From the north: Take 23 south to 32 east. Travel about two miles to Shyville Road. Turn south (right) on Shyville and travel to the Perimeter Road surrounding the plant (about two miles). Turn left onto Perimeter Road. Do NOT take the exit ramp to the Administration Building. Continue south to the second right, turn right on Hewes Street. The XT-801 building is the first building on the left. Please enter at the south door.

From the south: Take 23 north to the Wakefield exit. Turn right next to the abandoned rest stop. Take the second road to the right (Big Run Road). Travel until it ends at the Perimeter Road which surrounds the plant (about two miles). Turn right onto Perimeter Road, and take the first left (Hewes Street). The XT-801 building is the first building on the left. Please enter at the south door.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002506
<NAME> CASTLE & COOKE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         630,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,041,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       511,998
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,041,077
<SALES>                                        126,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,730
<CGS>                                          113,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Spectral Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Spalding, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Stephen SpaldingDate:   February 23, 2011
Stephen Spalding

Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15





November 13, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:       Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

         1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

         2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907) 1998 Employee Incentive
Compensation Plan


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated October 10, 2000 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three month and nine month period ended September 30, 2000 and
included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then
ended is incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to
above.

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shu Yeh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 20, 2012

 
|   | By:        | /S/ SHU YEH              |
|--------|------------|-------------------------------|
|   | **Name:**  | **Shu Yeh**                   |
|   | **Title:** | **Chief Financial   Officer** |

 

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: KEVIN SUNLIN WANG,

Appellant

______________________ 

2022-1510, 2022-1518

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 14/967,301, 

15/717,594.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KEVIN S. WANG, Law Office of Wood Wang & Associates, PLLC, Flushing, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID JOHN WOOD, I; DAVID AKER, Ohlandt, 

Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLP, Stamford, CT. 

 MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by 

ROBERT MCBRIDE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN 

RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 22-1510 Document: 116 Page: 1 Filed: 09/04/2024
 PER CURIAM (DYK, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 4, 2024

Date

Case: 22-1510 Document: 116 Page: 2 Filed: 09/04/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO OF ATARI, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atari, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Fremed, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                           By: /s/ David J. Fremed
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name: David J. Fremed
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 8, 2003

                                     Page 34
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 203/16/2015 17:34:36

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Oyster Creek Docket (050- 00219)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 160 - No communication / information not communicated L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

212

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

212

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

318

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR180 - Scheduling and planning LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA O - Control Room Ops 

O - Operations

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making O - Control Room Ops 

O - Operations

191 - Team interactions LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 2 of 203/16/2015 17:34:36

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Oyster Creek Docket (050- 00219)

Work Planning & Practices / IR192 - Work untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

953

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 17
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2018

a0523 

# Order

Clerk May 30, 2018

156409

In re Estate of EDWARD SADORSKI, SR.,

Deceased.

____________________________________

ANN SADORSKI,

Appellant,

v SC: 156409

COA: 332416

Macomb Probate Court:

KAREN MAHER, EDWARD SADORSKI, JR., 2014

- 214780

- DE

KENNETH SADORSKI, and

ESTELLE SADORSKI,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the appl ication for leave to appeal the July 20, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.