alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 755 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-445, K2025-442.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27889 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS**

We hereby consent to the use of our name in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and to the incorporation by reference of our estimates of the proved reserves and future net revenues from proved reserves ofTransmeridian Exploration Incorporated as of December 31, 2005 into Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-****132389, 333-129250, 333-127674 and 333-120930) and onForm S-8 (File Nos. 333-105610 and 333-105609) and the related prospectuses. 

/s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P. 

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. 

Houston, Texas 

March 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                     MECON, INC.
                                           
                STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE DATA)
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                           



FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,                    1997      1996
-----------------------------------                    ----      ----

Weighted average shares of common stock               6,002     5,886
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents               0       483
Shares used in per share calculation                  6,002     6,369
Net income (Loss)                                      (682)      313

Net income (loss) per share                          $(0.11)    $0.05
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, asadopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 9, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Wash. Guardsman Helps Strengthen Partnership with Kingdom of Thailand 

By Joseph SiemandelWashington National Guard

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### UNITED STATES, appellant, v. MARATHON PIPE LINE CO., et al.

No. 81-546.

Oct. 4, 1982.

Upon consideration of the motion of the Solicitor General to extend stay of judgment, and the responses thereto, it is ordered that the Clerk shall further stay the sending of the certified copy of the judgment to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota to and including December 24,1982.
### -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

32 34 36 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/08 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                                 September 30,        September 30,
                                               ------------------   -----------------
                                                 1999      1998      1999      1998
                                                 ----      ----      ----      ----
<S>                                            <C>        <C>       <C>      <C>
Net Income                                     $ 26,730    51,236    61,695    94,051
                                               ========   =======   =======   =======

Weighted average shares outstanding             219,221   222,703   220,836   223,372

Reduction for common shares not yet
 released by Employee Stock Ownership Plan       11,841    13,392    12,043    13,575
                                               --------   -------   -------   -------

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation              207,380   209,311   208,793   209,797
                                               ========   =======   =======   =======

Basic earnings per share                       $    .13       .25       .30       .45
                                               ========   =======   =======   =======

Total weighted average common shares
 outstanding for basic computation              207,380   209,311   208,793   209,797

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect of stock options                          2,643     4,028     2,796     3,838
                                               --------   -------   -------   -------

Total weighted average common shares and
 equivalents outstanding
 for diluted computation                        210,023   213,339   211,589   213,635
                                               ========   =======   =======   =======

Diluted earnings per share                     $    .13       .24       .29       .44
                                               ========   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1471 

To suspend assistance to countries denying or delaying accepting aliens 

ordered removed from the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To suspend assistance to countries denying or delaying accepting aliens ordered removed from the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF ASSISTANCE TO COUNTRIES 

4 DENYING OR DELAYING ACCEPTING ALIENS 

5 ORDERED REMOVED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall suspend the 

7 provision of assistance under any provision of law with re8 spect to each country on the list required by subsection 

9 (b). 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1471 IH

1 (b) LIST OF COUNTRIES.—Not later than 180 days 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 

3 thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub4 mit to Congress a list of each country that the Secretary 

5 determines denies or unreasonably delays accepting an 

6 alien who is a citizen, subject, national, or resident of that 

7 country after the Secretary asks whether the government 

8 will accept the alien under section 241 of the Immigration 

9 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1251). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1488 

AN ACT 

To retitle Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore as Indiana 

Dunes National Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1488 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indiana Dunes Na3 tional Park Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE RETITLED 

5 AS INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL PARK. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 

7 460u et seq.) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘National Lakeshore’’ and ‘‘na9 tional lakeshore’’ each place it appears and inserting 

10 ‘‘National Park’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘lakeshore’’ each place it ap12 pears and inserting ‘‘Park’’. 

13 (b) NONAPPLICATION.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to the title of the map 

15 referred to in the first section of Public Law 89–761 (16 

16 U.S.C. 460u), or to the title of the maps referred to in 

17 section 4 of Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 460u–3). 
3 

•HR 1488 EH

1 SEC. 3. PAUL H. DOUGLAS TRAIL. 

2 The 1.6 mile trail within the Indiana Dunes National 

3 Park designated the ‘‘Miller-Woods Trail’’ is hereby redes4 ignated as the ‘‘Paul H. Douglas Trail’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1488 

AN ACT 

To retitle Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore as Inposes. diana Dunes National Park, and for other pur-
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC to Hold Workshop May 17-20 near Philadelphia on New Oversight Processes for Nuclear Power Plants

----

----

No. 99-99 May 13, 1999

**NRC TO HOLD WORKSHOP MAY 17-20 NEAR PHILADELPHIAON NEW OVERSIGHT PROCESSES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public workshop Monday, May 17, through Thursday, May 20, near Philadelphia on the agency's new regulatory oversight program for nuclear power plants.

This workshop is intended to familiarize participants with the processes of performance indicator reporting, inspection, assessment and enforcement the NRC plans to use to monitor power plant licensees.

Participating in the workshop will be NRC staff members, representatives of the nuclear industry, state officials and other interested parties.

Sessions, all of which will be open to the public, will be held at the Philadelphia Airport Ramada Inn. Registration will take place from 10 a.m. to noon the first day. The workshop itself will begin thereafter and will continue until 5 p.m. Sessions will run from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. The program Thursday afternoon will be an overview structured specifically for licensee managers and others who cannot attend the entire workshop.

NRC has revamped its inspection and oversight process to utilize its resources more effectively and efficiently, in part because of improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over the past 20 years.

The program will be tested, beginning next month, on a pilot basis at nine power plant sites -- Hope Creek and Salem in New Jersey, FitzPatrick in New York, Prairie Island in Minnesota, Quad Cities in Illinois, Shearon Harris in North Carolina, Sequoyah in Tennessee, and Fort Calhoun and Cooper in Nebraska.

The plan is to apply it to all nuclear power plants after the pilot program has been evaluated and any necessary adjustments made.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

to the

WALGREEN CO. 2011 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     Effective January 1, 2011, the Walgreen Co. 2011 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the
“Plan”) is amended by adding the following language to the end of Section 4(A):



     “Notwithstanding the foregoing, executives who were eligible to participate or were
participating as of September 30, 2010 in the Walgreen Co. Profit-Sharing Restoration Plan may
elect to defer up to 15% of their base salary as of January 1, 2011.”
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carmen Lotito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


/s/ CARMEN J. LOTITO
--------------------------------------
Carmen J. Lotito
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1


                    Certification Pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Million Dollar Saloon, Inc. (Company)
on Form 10-QSB (Report) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Nick Mehmeti, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Nick Mehmeti
----------------
Nick Mehmeti
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 13, 2003
       ------------
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices2000

# Change Notice 00-010

Issue Date: 05/22/00

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

 

----

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

 

----

 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 17, 2020
Exhibit 4.3


 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We consent to the reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus and to the use of our report dated January 12, 2011, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-171480) of Smart Trust, Tax-Advantaged Growth & Income Trust (2011 Series A).

		
	 	 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
	 	 GRANT THORNTON LLP




 Chicago, Illinois


January 12, 2011
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Brian P. Alessi, certify that:

 

| 1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Emerging Vision, Inc.; |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; 

 

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date:       May 15, 2006 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Brian P. Alessi     |
|-------------------------|
| Brian P. Alessi         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
#### In re Ronnie Dale GOLDEN, Debtor. Ronnie Dale GOLDEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee.

No. 5:96CV392-RH.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida.

Dec. 17, 1996.

David L. Fleming, Gulf Breeze, FL, for Ronnie Dale Golden.

Marika Lancaster, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Internal Revenue Service.

Leigh D. Hart, Tallahassee, FL, trustee.

*ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL*

HINKLE, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the bankruptcy court overruling the objections of the debtor, Ronnie Dale Golden, to the claim of the Internal Revenue Service. The order provides that “the claim of the IRS is allowed in its entirety.”

The bankruptcy court has not entered a separate final judgment on the IRS’s claim. Nor has the court explicitly set forth the amount of the judgment it intends to enter. Determining the amount of the judgment may require more than simply consulting the claim itself; the IRS may, for example, be entitled to interest from the date of the claim forward, as well as to pre-claim interest as set forth in the claim itself. Moreover, Mr. Golden asserts he paid some or all of the amount the IRS claims; it is not completely clear whether the bankruptcy court has finally rejected this assertion.1

*253In the absence of a separate final judgment, the bankruptcy court’s order is not a final, appealable order. *See, e.g.,*Bankr.R. 9021; *see also In re Southeast Bank Corp.,*97 F.3d 476, 478 n. 4 (11th Cir.1996) (recognizing that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 is made applicable to bankruptcy proceedings by Bankruptcy Rule 9021). The parties have treated the order as appealable without raising this issue, and I therefore could do likewise, overlooking the technical requirement of a separate judgment. *See, e.g., Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis,*435 U.S. 381, 383-88, 98 S.Ct. 1117, 1119-22, 55 L.Ed.2d 357 (1978). Here, however, in light of the lack of definiteness regarding the precise amount of the judgment to be entered and the uncertainty regarding whether the bankruptcy court has finally rejected Mr. Golden’s payment defense, the better course is not to ignore the absence of a final judgment. *See, e.g., In re Behrens,*900 F.2d 97, 100 (7th Cir.1990). The order from which Mr. Golden has appealed is not a final judgment and is not otherwise appealable.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

1

. Mr. Golden asserts that the IRS's claim was in effect paid through the assignment of certain *253receivables to the IRS. Mr. Golden failed to prove this contention at the evidentiary hearing that led to entry of the bankruptcy court’s order. It is not completely clear whether the bankruptcy court intended the hearing to address this issue or instead intended the hearing to address only the IRS's claim without reaching the payment defense.