alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pacific Partnership 2019 Completes Final Mission Stop in Thailand  

MC1 Nathan Carpenter, PP19 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

NO. 03-13-00579-CV

In re Elena Hutchins

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator’s motion for rehearing and amended petition for writ of mandamus are

denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), 52.9.

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Pemberton, Rose, and Goodwin

Filed: December 5, 2013
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Kallassy,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
            November
      16, 2009








By:
            /s/ John A.
      Kallassy


Title:
            Treasurer
      and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 13

- 00049

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 1001030

Style: Juan Jose Rojas

v Lilian Guardado

Date motion filed * : April 1, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to Extend Time to File Clerk's Record

Party filing motion: District clerk

Document to be filed: Clerk's Record

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: Feb ruary 11, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested: April 11, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: April 11, 2013

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , wa nt of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Michael Massengale

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: April 4, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John P. Howlett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |                                                                                                                                                        

| | /s/  John P. Howlett   
| | -----------------------
| | John P. Howlett        
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | July 14, 2005          
| |                        

---
#### In the Matter of Donald Hipp, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller, New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 446]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a Bay Constable for the Town of Hempstead in Nassau County, was injured when he slipped on ice while walking from the parking lot to his office at the start of his shift. Minutes prior to the accident, petitioner had punched in at work and he sustained his injuries while returning from his car to retrieve his eyeglasses. Respondent found that petitioner did not sustain his injuries in the course of performing his duties as a Bay Constable and, therefore, denied his application for accidental disability retirement benefits. Inasmuch as there is evidence in the record that petitioner was not in uniform and not actually performing his job duties at the time of the accident, we find that respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., *755concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
SUSANA MARTINEZ GOVERNOR JOHNA. SANCHEZ LIEUTENANTGOVERNOR

April 19, 2011 State of New Mexico 

### ENVIRONMENTDEPARTf!f{(t}lI:. (j- 

### SFU L. AirQualityBureau·ANN1NG 

### SEC 1301 SilerRoad, Building1lf

## APR 26 PH 5: 26 Santa Fe, NM 87507·3113 Telephone (505) 476·4300 Fax (505) 476·4375 www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb DAVEMARTIN CABINETSECRETARY

RAJ SOLOMON, PE DEPUTYSECRETARY

Mr. Guy Donaldson Chief, Air Planning Section Region VI (6PD-L) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
Dear Guy,
This letter serves to clarifythe State ofNew Mexico's priorletters ofcertification dated December 10, 2007 and March 3, 2008. In those letters, the State ofNew Mexico through the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) certified that it satisfied the State Implementation Plan (SIP) infrastructure requirements contained in Section IIO(a)(I) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 ozone NAAQS, but that it did not satisfy all the requirements contained in Section IIO(a)(I) and (2) for the PM2.5 NAAQS. This letter serves two purposes: 1.) Clarifies that the following portions ofthe December 10, 2007, March 3, 2008 and June II, 2009 submittals are, in part, the infrastructure SIP component in front ofEPA for action:
1997 Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS: The infrastructure SIP for implementation of the 1997 ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS as submitted to EPA now satisfythe infrastructure requirements contained in Section 11O(a)(I) and (2) ofthe CAA. Adequate Resources: The resources for portions ofthe PSD programrelated to greenhouse gases which are before EPA as part ofthe infrastructure SIP submittal, consisting of those portions which remained approved afterthe promulgation ofEPA's PSD SIP Narrowing Rule (See 75 FR 82536), are sufficientto satisfy the requirements ofsection 11O(a)(2)(E).
PSD and Visibility Protection: The portions ofthe PSD programrelated to greenhouse gases which are before EPA as part ofthe infrastructure SIP submittal, consisting of those portions which remained approved afterthe promulgation ofEPA's PSD SIP Narrowing Rule (See 75 FR 82536), satisfy the requirements ofsection 110(a)(2)(J).Mr. Guy Donaldson April 19, 2011 Page 2

2.) Clarifies that the following element is part ofthe infrastructure SIP submittal in front ofEPA for action: 

### Programs for Prevention of Significant Deterioration: The portions of the PSD program related to greenhouse gas permitting which remained approved after the promulgation ofEPA's PSD SIP Narrowing Rule (See 75 FR 82536) satisfy the requirements ofsection llO(a)(2)(C).
Sincerely,

# ~h~-Wcf Air Quality Bureau
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1684 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1684

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
    to provide technical assistance to common interest communities 
 regarding eligibility for disaster assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster Assistance Support for 
Communities and Homeowners Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Administrator of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency shall provide technical assistance to a 
common interest community that provides essential services of a 
governmental nature on actions that a common interest community may 
take in order to be eligible to receive reimbursement from a grantee 
that receives funds from the Agency for certain activities performed 
after an event that results in a disaster declaration.
    (b) Recommendations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall provide to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 
Senate a legislative proposal on how to provide eligibility for 
disaster assistance with respect to common areas of condominiums and 
housing cooperatives.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2119
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.M. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VTT MANAGEMENT INC.; VTT CHARLOTTE LLC; DEBBIE HICKS; CHRISTOPHER LOEBSACK; LATONYA CAMERON; BRITTANY BANKS; VICTOR JIMENEZ; MECKLENBURG COUNTY; MARTA CARSON, in her individual and official capacity; BECKY T. TIN, in her individual and official capacity; DONNIE HOOVER, in his individual and official ca pacity; ELIZABETH THORTON TROSCH, in her individual and official capacity; JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1

- 30 , Defendants

- Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00826

- RJC

- DSC )

Submitted : January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f); denying McDaniel’s motion fo r judgment as a matter of law; and denying as moot McDaniel’s motion for sanctions and motion in limine. We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, “drawing reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non

- moving party.” Butler v. Drive Auto. Indus. of Am., Inc. , 793 F.3d 404, 407 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Summary judgment is proper ‘if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a m atter of law.’” Id. at 408 (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). The relevant inquiry is whether the evidence “presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one

- sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law.” M cAirlaids, Inc. v. Kimberly

- Clark Corp. , 756 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). To survive summary judgment, “the nonmoving party must rely on more than conclusory allegations, mere speculation, the building of one inference upon another, or the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence.” Dash v. Mayweather , 731 F.3d 303, 311 (4th Cir. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McD aniel v. VTT Mgmt. Inc. ,3 No. 3:16

- cv - 00826

- RJC

- DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 781 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-482, K2025-479.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27957 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21
- 0050

_________________ IN RE: THE PARENTING OF: P.H.R. and P.H.R, Minor Children, MARLEN DELANO RUSSELL,

Petitioner and Appellee, and SARAH PATRICIA RUSSELL,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file his response brief and g ood cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee has until June 7, 2021, within which to file his response brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 19 2021

05/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0050
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

** **

Date:  November 5, 2009                                          /s/ Greg Wujek

                                                                                        Greg Wujek

                                                                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

----
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of INSIGNIA SOLUTIONS
PLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Michael Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/Michael MooreMichael
      MooreChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      14, 2009
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1476 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

individuals eligible for Indian Health Service assistance 

to qualify for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1476 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American 

3 Health Savings Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH SERV5 ICE ASSISTANCE NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM 

6 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS EL11 IGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER INDIAN

12 HEALTH SERVICE PROGRAMS.—For purposes of 

13 subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall not be 

14 treated as covered under a health plan de15 scribed in such subparagraph merely because 

16 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

17 services under a medical care program of the 

18 Indian Health Service or of a tribal organiza19 tion.’’. 
3 

•HR 1476 EH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2018. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1476 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

accounts. Service assistance to qualify for health savings permit individuals eligible for Indian Health
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1627 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1627

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reinstate the returning 
        worker exemption for H-2B visas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2017

  Mr. Bergman (for himself and Mr. Keating) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reinstate the returning 
        worker exemption for H-2B visas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Assistance Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended by striking 
``during fiscal year 2013, 2014, or 2015 shall not again be counted 
toward such limitation during fiscal year 2016'' and inserting the 
following: ``during fiscal year 2014, 2015, or 2016 shall not again be 
counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 2017''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if enacted on October 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```