alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan E. Steigerwald, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Union Drilling, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Union Drilling, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Union Drilling, Inc.

|        |  |  |        |  |  |                                                                        |
|--------|--|--|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | By:    |  |  | /s/ Dan E. Steigerwald         |
|   |  |  | Name:  |  |  | Dan E. Steigerwald                                                     |
|   |  |  | Title: |  |  | Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary       |
|   |  |  | Date:  |  |  | March  15,  2007                                                       |
|        |

----
#### In the Matter of Larry CALVERT and Janet Calvert, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 81-02069-SJ-13.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W. D. Missouri, St. Joseph Division.

Dec. 29, 1981.

James H. Thompson, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for debtors.

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF PLAN OF ARRANGEMENT UNDER CHAPTER 13 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

DENNIS J. STEWART, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter of confirmation of the debt- or’s plan of arrangement under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code came on for hearing in St. Joseph, Missouri, on November 20, 1981. At that time, the debtor appeared personally and by counsel, James H. Thompson, Jr., Esquire. The objecting creditor, Morris Plan, appeared by Denise Bartles, its counsel.

Counsel for the debtor then announced that the matter of the objection to the plan of arrangement had been fully settled by amendment of the plan to provide for full payment of the objecting creditor’s claim before payment to any other creditor. Upon effectation of this amendment, presumably, the objection of the creditor would be voluntarily withdrawn.

This proposed amendment amounts to a classification of creditors under the plan whereby the objecting creditor would enjoy priority classification above all other creditors. At the same time, although an explicit opportunity for a hearing has been granted, no justification for such a classification has been stated or shown. And no justification readily appears from the files and records in this case. It must therefore be concluded that the plan as amended is viola-tive of so much of § 1322(b)(1) of the Code which prohibits unfair discrimination against any class of claims.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that confirmation of the plan of arrangement, as orally amended on No*508vember 20, 1981, be, and it is hereby, de^ nied.
26:(52657,

 :DVKLQJWRQ'&



NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site***0D\

CLINCH RIVER CORPORATION Harriman, Tennessee

Roane County



Site Location:

7KH &OLQFK 5LYHU &RUSRUDWLRQ VLWH FRQVLVWV RI DSSUR[LPDWHO\ D FUHV DQG LV ORFDWHG RQW KH EDQNV RI WKH (PRU\

5LYHU:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLULQ+DUULPDQ7HQQHVVHH



Site History:

&OLQFK5LYHU&RUSRUDWLRQRSHUDWHGDVDSXOSDQGSDSHUPLOOIURPXQWLO%\SURGXFWVRIWKHPDQXIDFWXULQJ

SURFHVVLQFOXGHVSHQWSURFHVVLQJOLTXLGV3EODFNOLTXRU ́FRDOWDUFRQVWLWXHQWVSRO\QXFOHDUDURPDWLFK\GURFDUERQVRU

3$+VDQGSLOHVRIZDVWHSDSHU



Site Contamination/Contaminants:

+LVWRULFDOLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDWWKHVLWHKDYHUHYHDOHGH[WHQVLYHFRQWDPLQDWLRQLQVXUIDFHDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLODQGVKDOORZ

JURXQGZDWHU&RQWDPLQDWLRQLQFOXGHVHOHYDWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRIVLWHUHODWHGKD]DUGRXVVXEVWDQFHVLQFOXGLQJGLR[LQV

IXUDQV3$+VSRO\FKORULQDWHGELSKHQ\OV3&%VDQGYDULRXVPHWDOVLQVXUIDFHDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLO,QDGGLWLRQVLWH

UHODWHGFRQWDPLQDQWVKDYHEHHQIRXQGLQVHGLPHQWDQGILVKWLVVXHZLWKLQWKH(PRU\5LYHU:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLU



Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

5HFHQW LQYHVWLJDWLRQV VXJJHVW WKDW RIIVLWH PLJUDWLRQ IURP FRQWDPLQDWHG VRXUFH DUHDV RI GLR[LQV IXUDQV 3$+V DQG

VHYHUDOPHWDOVLQWR:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLUPD\KDYHDIIHFWHGWKHILVKHU\7KH(PRU\5LYHU:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLULV

XVHG IRU UHFUHDWLRQDO DQG VXEVLVWHQFH ILVKLQJ $Q HVWLPDWHG SRX QGV RI ILVK DUH KDUYHVWHG DQQXDOO\ IURP WKH

:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLU ,QDGGLWLRQWKH(PRU\5LYHU:DWWV%DUU5HVHUYRLULVD KDELWDW IRUWKUHH IHGHUDOO\ GHVLJQDWHG

HQGDQJHUHGPXVVHOVSHFLHVLQFOXGLQJWKH)LQHUD\HGSLJWRHPXVVHO3XUSOHEHDQPXVVHODQGWKH$ODEDPDODPSPXVVHO



Response Activities (to date):

,Q6HSWHPEHUWKH(3$FRQGXFWHGDQHPHUJHQF\UHPRYDODWWKHVLWH7KH(3$UHPRYHGGUXPVRIKD]DUGRXV

PDWHULDOFRQWDPLQDWHGVRLOIURPWKHGUXPVWRUDJHDUHDDQGJDOORQVRIEODFNOLTXRUIURPWKHVLWH



Need for NPL Listing:

7KH VWDWH RI7HQQHVVHH UHIHUUHGWKH VLWHWRWKH(3$WRDOORZ IRUDFRPSUHKHQVLYHFOHDQXSWRDGGUHVVDOOWKH KXPDQ

KHDOWKDQGHQYLURQPHQWDOULVNVSRVHGE\WKHVLWH2WKHUIHGHUDODQGVWDWHFOHDQXSSURJUDPVZHUHHYDOXDWHGEXWDUHQRW

YLDEOHDWWKLVWLPH7KH(3$UHFHLYHGDOHWWHURIVXSSRUWIRUSODFLQJWKLVVLWHRQWKH13/IURPWKHVWDWH



[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]



)RUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHKD]DUGRXVVXEVWDQFHVLGHQWLILHGLQWKLVQDUUDWLYHVXPPDU\LQFOXGLQJJHQHUDOLQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJWKHHIIHFWVRIH[SRVXUHWR

WKHVHVXEVWDQFHVRQKXPDQKHDOWKSOHDVHVHHWKH$JHQF\IRU7R[LF6XEVWDQFHVDQG'LVHDVH5HJLVWU\$76'57R[)$4V$76'57R[)$4VFDQEHIRXQGRQ

WKH,QWHUQHWDWKWWSZZZDWVGUFGFJRYWR[IDTVLQGH[DVSRUE\WHOHSKRQHDW$76'5RU
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2000   AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH FORM 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                    128,753
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,337,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                849,666
<PP&E>                                           58,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (37,427)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,960,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           514,302
<BONDS>                                         477,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,179
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,711,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,960,695
<SALES>                                          57,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 57,410
<CGS>                                            46,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                222,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (222,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (222,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .00



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                          |  |                                   
|----------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|            |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. 
|            |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
|            |  |                         
|            |  | By:                      |  | KESTREL HEAT LLC (General Partner)
|            |  |                         
|May 7, 2008 |  | By:                      |  | /s/ RICHARD F. AMBURY             
|            |  |                          |  | Richard F. Ambury                 
|            |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer           
|            |  |                          |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.           
|            |  |                          |  | Star Gas Finance Company
No. 91-6056.

#### Hill *v.*Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,720-01 & WR-88,720-02

EX PARTE JASON EARL WHITE, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W10077-1 & W8888-1 IN THE 335 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). In Cause No. CR10077, Applicant was

convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault, one count of indecency with a child by

contact, and three counts of indecency with a child by exposure and sentenced to sixty-five years’

imprisonment, twenty years’ imprisonment, and eight years’ imprisonment, respectively. In Cause

No. 8888, Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to forty

years’ imprisonment. Applicant’s convictions were affirmed by the Second Court of Appeals. White

v. State, Nos. 02-07-00089-CR & 02-07-00090-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 29, 2008) (not
2

designated for publication). 

The Court remanded these writ applications for responses and findings addressing one of

Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and for a finding concerning the status of a

pending motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. 

After an independent review of the entire record and the trial court’s findings, we find that

Applicant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit. Therefore, we deny relief.

Applicant’s claim for pre-sentence jail time credit is dismissed. Ex parte Florence, 319

S.W.3d 695 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 

Filed: January 30, 2019

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         38,021                         0
<SECURITIES>                                        0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,505                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         0                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               58,710                         0
<PP&E>                                      1,207,879                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 40,572                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,245,734                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          81,565                         0
<BONDS>                                       300,000                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                         0
<COMMON>                                          958                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                    841,033                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,245,734                         0
<SALES>                                             0                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,231                    19,763
<CGS>                                               0                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,282                    10,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,823                     9,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,122                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 8,004                     4,103
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,202                     1,633
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,802                     2,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                         0
<CHANGES>                                           0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,802                     2,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.05                      0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.05                      0.03
        


</TABLE>
No. 82-5914.

#### Combs *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### Margaret Divjak, as Administratrix of the Estate of Emily Winkler, Deceased, Appellant, v New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 758]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff *696appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an amended order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 28, 1994, which adhered to a prior determination of the same court contained in an order dated January 6, 1994, granting the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the amended order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

On July 8, 1993, the defendant served the plaintiff with notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 to serve and file a note of issue within 90 days. By notice of motion dated September 27, 1993, the defendant cross-moved to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. Since the cross motion to dismiss was served before the expiration of the 90-day period, the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the cross motion *(see, Lyons v Butler,*134 AD2d 576; *Genovese v Kogel Materials Corp.,*61 AD2d 820). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred by granting the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Coper tino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of Berthel Fisher & Company Leasing, Inc. as of
June 30, 2000, and the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         452,555
<SECURITIES>                                 1,502,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,009,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (469,754)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         444,024
<DEPRECIATION>                               (281,721)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,979,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          338,988
<BONDS>                                      5,650,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,621,422
<COMMON>                                       884,705
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,516,125)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,979,146
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               737,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               583,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,556
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (45,652)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (81,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,304,525               5,461,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,676                  50,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,635                  57,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,560,836               5,568,729
<PP&E>                                       5,685,139               4,936,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 526,191                 332,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,719,784              10,172,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,225                 959,734
<BONDS>                                      3,000,000               3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        22,800                  22,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,457,899              13,457,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,719,784              10,172,494
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,538                  60,392
<CGS>                                          293,788                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,788                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,053,153                 712,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,518                 170,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,054,921)               (822,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,073                     915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,505,994)               (823,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0               (729,658)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,505,994)             (1,553,111)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 2023

- 3354

_____________________________ J EFFERY G REENE , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 7, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. See Jordan v. State , 549 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (holding that access to a prison law library is not “necessary to prepare and transmit a simple notice of appeal” and lack of that access did not demonstrate “a right to [a] belated appeal”).

B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jeffery Greene, pro se , Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.