alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### CASE NO. 01-15-003 35

- CV

_________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

__________________________________
CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC

APPELLANTS

V.

5433 WESTHEIMER, LP; 5433 WESTHEIMER, GP LLC; and SONGY5433

WESTHEIMER,

APPELLEES

__________________________________

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE CLERK’S RECORD

_________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:



### COMES NOW, CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRI C, LLC

Appellants herein, and move this Court to extend the File Clerk’s Record Tex. R.

App. P. 5

. ACCEPTED 01-01-15-0035-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 10:05:28 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKIn support thereof, Appellants would show as follows:

I

The Appellant did not pay for the District Clerk’s record

. There was a

misunderstanding and Appe llant was under the impression that all monetary requirements

had been met. Appellant understands that there were several notifications issued by the

Court; however, Appellant did not open an e

- mail and the postcards were never brought

to his attention.

II

On April 14, 2015 , Appellants filed a Notice of Appeal was assigned to the First

Court of Appeals. In error, Appellant did not request either Record until the first week in

May; when the error was discovered, Appellant requested both records immediate ly.

III.

A reasonable period should be allowed prior to the filing of the records,

Appellants asks that this Court allow an additional thirty (30) days to allow time for the

Clerk’s record to be filed

. Appellant filed the credit card information for the cost of the

clerk’s record on November 11, 2015. The payment or request is not showing in the

clerk’s on line record. Appellant will call the Harris County District Clerk’s office for a

status update and will contact this Court if there are any problems. Further, Appellant

has not received a receipt for payment and that will be part of the conversation with the

Clerk’s office.PRAYER

WHEREFORE, THESE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants pray that this

Court extend the time for the filing of Clerk’s record for thirty (30) da ys and to grant

such other and further relief to which Appellant s may show themselves justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

OPPEL & GOLDBERG, P.L.L.C.

_____ /s/

_ Jeffrey Wells Oppel

________________ Jeffrey We lls Oppel TSBN 15291800 1010 Lamar, Suite 1420 Houston, Texas 77002 713

- 659

- 9200 (Phone) 713

- 659

- 9300 (Fax) joppel@ogs

- law.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that in compliance with Rule 21a, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, a copy of the foregoing instrument was properly served via Electronic Filing on this the 1 st day of December

, 20 15 , on the attorney

- of

- record as follows:

Lansford O. Ireson, Jr. I RESON & W EIZEL , PLLC 9720 C ypresswood Dr., Suite 238 Houston Texas 77070 (713) 228

- 1160 (713) 228

- 1161

__ /s/

_ Jeffrey Wells Oppel

________ Jeffrey Wells Oppel
No. 91-6187.

#### Webb *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Military Medical Assistance to Vietnam

U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Vietnam

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 15300-001]

                    Take notice that BOST1 Hydroelectric LLC., permittee for the proposed Heard County Pumped Storage Project, has requested that its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on October 19, 2023,[1]                                          and would have expired on September 30, 2027. The project would have been located approximately 1.8 miles west of the City of Enon Grove, Heard County, Georgia.                

                    The preliminary permit for Project No. 15300 will remain in effect until the close of business, December 20, 2024. But, if the Commission is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.[2]                                          New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the permit surrender is effective.                

Dated: November 20, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             185 FERC ¶ 61,041 (2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2024).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-27768 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1636 

To reauthorize the matching grant program for school security in the 

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2017 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. COFFMAN, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, and Ms. DELBENE) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the matching grant program for school security in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Safety Act of 

5 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1636 IH

1 SEC. 2. MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL SECU2 RITY. 

3 Part AA of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

4 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797a et seq.) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in section 2701— 

7 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and 

8 other deterrent measures’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

9 other deterrent measures, and emergency notifi10 cation and response technologies’’; and 

11 (B) in subsection (b)— 

12 (i) by redesignating paragraph (5) as 

13 paragraph (6); and 

14 (ii) by inserting after paragraph (4) 

15 the following: 

16 ‘‘(5) Acquisition and installation of technology 

17 for expedited notification of local law enforcement 

18 during an emergency.’’; and 

19 (2) in section 2705, by striking ‘‘fiscal years 

20 2001 through 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

21 2018 through 2022’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, asadopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: February 8, 2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Singapore, Thailand Wrap Up field Training Exercise 

By Capt. Lauren LinscottPacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Appendix B. Legal Description for Northern Ada County 

PM10 Maintenance Area
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.
Appendix B. Legal Description for Northern Ada County 

PM10 Maintenance Area

The legal description of the Northern Ada County PM10 area boundaries is as follows:

Beginning at a point in the center of the channel of the Boise River where the section line 

between Sections 15 and 16 of Township 3 North, Range 4 East, crosses the Boise River.

Northern Boundary

Thence down the center of the channel of the Boise River to a point opposite the mouth of 

Mores Creek.

Thence in a straight-line going 44 degrees north and 38 minutes west until said line intersects 

the north line of Township 5 North in Range 1 East.

Thence west to the northwest corner of Section 6, Township 5 North, Range 1 West.

Western Boundary

Thence south to the northwest corner of Section 6, Township 3 North, Range 1 West.

Thence east to the northeast corner of Section 5, Township3 North, Range 1 West.

Thence south to the southeast corner of Section 32, Township 2 North, Range 1 West.

Thence west to the northwest corner of Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 1 West.

Thence south to the southwest corner of Section 31, Township 1 North, Range 1 West.

Southern Boundary

Thence east to the southeast corner of Section 33, Township 1 North, Range 4 East.

Eastern Boundary

Thence north to the point of beginning.
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Michael D. Bornak

Name: Michael D. BornakTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1541 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 171
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1541

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE LUNETTE BLAIR.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to authorize establishment of the Fort 
Scott National Historic Site, Kansas, and for other purposes.'', 
approved October 19, 1978 (Public Law 95-484) is amended--
            (1) in the first section--
                    (A) by inserting ``only'' after ``donation''; and
                    (B) by striking ``: Provided, that the buildings so 
                acquired shall not include the structure known as 
                `Lunette Blair'''; and
            (2) in section 2--
                    (A) by striking ``When the site of'' and inserting 
                ``(a) When the site of''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The boundary of the Fort Scott National Historic Site 
established under subsection (a) is modified as generally depicted on 
the map referred to as `Fort Scott National Historic Site Proposed 
Boundary Modification', numbered 471/80,057C, and dated February 
2017.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 171

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1541

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain property 
related to the Fort Scott National Historic Site in Fort Scott, Kansas, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 12, 2017

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6558

CURTIS NIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WOLFE, Officer, Defendant - Appellee, and CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-192) Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Nixon, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Nixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nixon v. Wolfe , No. CA-00-192 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
================================================================================
================================================================================
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

 
                                                OMNIPOINT CORPORATION

                                      STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

                                        ( In thousands, except per share data)



                                                Three Months Ended September 30,         Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                                               (unaudited)                             (unaudited)
                                                ----------------------------------       ---------------------------------
                                                     1997               1996                  1997              1996
                                                ---------------     --------------       ---------------   ---------------
     Calculation of primary loss per share:
       <S>                                      <C>                 <C>                  <C>                <C>           
       Net loss                                 $     (81,161)      $     (27,851)       $     (201,830)    $     (65,264)
                                                ===============     ==============       ===============   ===============          
   
       Common shares outstanding                        51,587             50,278                51,440            45,458

                                                ---------------     --------------       ---------------   ---------------
            Total shares - primary
                                                        51,587             50,278                51,440            45,458
                                                ===============     ==============       ===============   ===============
     Primary loss per share:
       Net loss per share                       $       (1.57)      $      (0.55)         $      (3.92)    $       (1.44)
                                                ===============     ==============       ===============   ===============








Note:     The computation of fully diluted earnings per share is identical to that of primary earnings per share for
          the periods presented above and therefore is not included separately herein.

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
J

- A16041

- 17

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

S.M.B.,

Appellee

v.

J.M.K.,

Appellant : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

: PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 1810 WDA 2016

Appeal from the Order Entered October 31, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County, Domestic Relations, at No(s): Docket Number: 00420 DR 2016

PACSES Case Number 651109912

BEFORE: STABILE, J., FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., and STRASS BURGER ,* J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 7, 2017

J.M.K. (Father) appeals from the October 31, 2016 order 1 that denied

his objection to the registration in Mercer County of an order for child

support entered by the trial court in L awrence County in favor of S.M.B.

(Mother). Because Appellant failed to appear for oral argument before this

Court despite having acknowledged that he received notice of its scheduled

date and time, we dismiss this appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 2314 (“If appella nt or

the moving party is not ready to proceed when a case is called for oral

argument, the matter may be dismissed as of course.”).

Appeal dismissed.

1 The order is dated October 28, 2016, but was not filed until October 31, 2016. We have amended the appeal paragraph accordingly.J

- A16041

- 17

- 2

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 9/7/2017