alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Douglas J. Cahill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doane Pet Care Company, herebycertify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Doane Pet Care Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 16, 2006     /s/ DOUGLAS J. CAHILL     Douglas J. Cahill  President and Chief Executive Officer  Doane Pet Care Company
32
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Air Force Kicks Off Participation in Exercise Pitch Black 2018

8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/05 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Australia co-hosts 2022 Indo-Pacific Chiefs of Defense conference

Australia Government Defence

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Xochytl Greer v. Wesley Michael Melcher

Appellate case number: 01-19-00287-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-41808

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Xochytl Greer, has filed a motion for review of the trial court’s order 

sustaining the court reporter’s contest to appellant’s statement of inability to pay costs. 

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(1). Accordingly, we direct the trial court clerk to prepare and 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing:

• Order on Contest to Petitioner’s Statement of Inability to Pay Costs, signed 

on May 3, 2019.

And, we direct court reporter, Douglas Faulin, (or the official or substitute court reporter)

to prepare and file a reporter’s record of the May 3, 2019 hearing on the contest to 

appellant’s statement of inability to pay costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(3). 

 The supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the May 3, 2019 hearing 

shall be prepared and filed without charge to appellant. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(3). 

The supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the May 3, 2019 hearing 

are due to be filed in this Court no later than 14 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __May 21, 2019__
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1588 

To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to prohibit the nonconsensual 

distribution of private sexual images. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2017 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, 

Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. HIMES, Ms. KUSTER of 

New Hampshire, Ms. NORTON, Ms. ROSEN, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. 

WALZ, Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. O’HALLERAN, and Ms. 

FRANKEL of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to prohibit 

the nonconsensual distribution of private sexual images. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Inti5 mate Privacy Protection Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1588 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NONCONSENSUAL DISTRIBUTION 

2 OF PRIVATE SEXUAL IMAGES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 920c of title 10, United 

4 States Code (article 120c of the Uniform Code of Military 

5 Justice), is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub7 section (e); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol9 lowing new subsection (d): 

10 ‘‘(d) NONCONSENSUAL DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE

11 SEXUAL IMAGES.—Any person subject to this chapter 

12 who— 

13 ‘‘(1) knowingly broadcasts or distributes a vis14 ual image of another person who— 

15 ‘‘(A) is at least 18 years of age; 

16 ‘‘(B) is identifiable from the image itself or 

17 from information displayed in connection with 

18 the image; and 

19 ‘‘(C) is engaged in a sexual act or exposes 

20 a private area; 

21 ‘‘(2) obtained the image under circumstances in 

22 which a reasonable person would know or under23 stand that the image was to remain private; and 

24 ‘‘(3) knows or reasonably should have known 

25 that the person depicted in the image has not con26 sented to the broadcast or distribution, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1588 IH

1 is guilty of nonconsensual distribution of private sexual 

2 images and shall be punished as a court-martial may di3 rect.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply to offenses committed on or 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 20-13044

Non-Argument Calendar

_____________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-20060-FAM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FREDERIK BARBIERI,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_____________________

(April 26, 2021)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-13044 Date Filed: 04/26/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Frederick Barbieri appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for 

compassionate release under the First Step Act, Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. 

Contrary to the position it took in the district court, the government now concedes—

based on recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control – that Mr. Barbieri’s 

medical conditions constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason for release. 

Those conditions (coronary artery disease, ischemia, high blood pressure, and 

diabetes) are serious medical conditions which according to the CDC put Mr. 

Barbieri at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection.

Given that the district court denied relief to Mr. Barbieri on the ground that 

he had not shown an extraordinary and compelling reason for release, and that the 

government has since changed its position on that issue, we agree that vacatur and 

remand is appropriate. See, e.g., Griekspoor v. United States, 511 F. 2d 137, 138 

(5th Cir. 1975). On remand the district court shall re-evaluate Mr. Barbieri’s motion 

after receiving supplemental briefing from the parties.

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

* Mr. Barbieri’s motion to file supplemental materials is granted.

USCA11 Case: 20-13044 Date Filed: 04/26/2021 Page: 2 of 2
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

October 8, 2015

John Bennett

Attorney at Law

P. O. Box 19144

Amarillo, TX 79114

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Warren L. Clark

Kristy Wright

Asst. Criminal District Attorney

Randall County Justice Center

2309 Russell Long Blvd., Suite 120

Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00181-CR, 07-15-00182-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 18,607-B, 18,608-B

Style: Michael Don Denton v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court this day issued an opinion and judgment in the captioned cause. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.

In addition, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(b)(2), exhibits on

file with this Court, if any

, will be destroyed three years after final disposition of the case

or at an earlier date if ordered by the Court.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable John B. Board (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Honorable Ron Enns (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Jo Carter (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
1

... Relator asserts this matter arises from proceedings in Bexar County, but he does not identify the trial court

or provide a cause number. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00652-CR

IN RE Delfino GONZALEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 1, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Delfino Gonzalez seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Universal City Municipal Court

“to set aside and quash or dismiss outstanding warrant order.” This court’s mandamus jurisdiction

is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code, which expressly limits the mandamus

jurisdiction of our court to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in our

district; and (2) all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221

(Vernon 2004). Thus, this court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a municipal

court judge unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Dockery, No. 04-07-0013-CV,

2007 WL 595057, *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio February 28, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Relator does not argue that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction. 
04-08-00652-CR

-2-

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Carrier Strike Group 1, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Conduct Bilateral Operations 

By Carrier Strike Group 1 Public Affairs 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
EXHIBIT
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







Ames
      National Corporation


Ames,
      Iowa








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-89772 on Form S-8 of Ames National Corporation of our reports, dated
      February 27, 2007 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
      statements, and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in
      this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ames National Corporation for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.








*/s/
      Clifton Gunderson LLP*








West
      Des
      Moines, Iowa


March
      15,
      2007
#### In the Matter of Jorge Borda, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 36]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because respondent’s determination was made in accordance with statutory requirements, it is not subject to judicial review *(see, Matter of Gaithor v Russi,*186 AD2d 1048). We reject petitioner’s argument that respondent considered only the seriousness of petitioner’s offense in reaching its determination, and we conclude that it considered only the relevant guidelines *(cf., Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole,*83 NY2d 788, 790-791). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
June 11, 2015

Mr. James Duisenberg James Duisenberg d/b/a Tap Productions

495 Tabor Drive Unit #3 Scotts Valley, CA 95066

Dear Mr. Duisenberg:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1892), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
# THEATTORNEYGENERAI, 0F TEXAS

September 15, 1977

Honorable Joe Resweber County Attorney Harris County Courthouse Houston, Texas 77002 Opinion No. H-1054 Re: Whether a sheriff or constable can recover the cost ofpostage incurred when service of citation is bymail. Dear Mr. Resweber: You have requested our opinion concerning whether a sheriff or constable can recover the cost of postage incurred when service of citation isbymail. Article 3933a, V.T.C.S., provides inpart: Sheriffs and Constables shall receive the following fees: For each person, corporation or legal entity, onwhom service of citation, subpoena, summons, or process not otherwise provided for, isperformed and return made, including mileage, ifany, a fee of (a)Small Claims Courts $4.00 (b)All other Courts $8.00 Rule 106, Tex. R. Civ. P., provides forpersonal service, substituted service, service bymail, "or inany other manner which will be reasonably effective to give the defendant notice of the suit." Rule 116, Tex. R. Civ. P., provides for citation by publication. In Cook v. Jones, 521 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ. App.
-- Dallas 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.), the court stated indicta that the sheriff or constable could normally recover the costs of publication "as hemay charge a fee for serving other citations." 521 S.W.Zd at 338. Apparently the court viewed Rule 116 asproviding for service not contemplated under article 3933a. However, article 3933a was clearly intended to apply topersonal service, and service bymail isprovided for by the sameRule 106.

p. 4332Honorable JoeResweber -Page 2 (H-1054)

InAttorney General stated: Opinion S-87 (1953)at 2 this office

Fee statutes are strictly construed and fees are not permitted by implication. Binford v. Robinson, 112 Tex. 86, 244S.W. 807 (1922);McCalla v. City of Rockdale, 112Tex. 209, 246 S.W. 654 (1922). In light of the general rule noted in S-87 and the provision for personal service and service bymail in the same rule, in our opinion article 3933a was intended to apply to service bymail. Accordingly, a sheriff or constable may receive only the fees specified in article 3933a for service of citation by mail; hemay not recover the cost of postage. SUMMARY The fee for service of citation bymail isgoverned by article 3933a, V.T.C.S. A sheriff or constable may not recover the costs ofpostage in addition to the fees authorized by article 3933a.

/Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

Opinion Committee jst

p. 4333