alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


I, Gene Jackson, certify that;

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Kingdom
Ventures Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registration as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
         6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                         /s/ Gene Jackson
                                        -------------------------
                                        Gene Jackson
                                        Principal Accounting Officer
August 03, 2005
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Resulting from International Agreements

# Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 Against Critical Flow Data From Marviken Tests JIT 11 and CFT 21 (NUREG/IA-0007)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/IA-0007 (PDF 1.84 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** September 1986

**Prepared by:** 0. Rosdahl, D. Caraher

Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate P.O. Box 27106 S102 #52 Stockholm, Sweden

**Prepared as part of:** The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)

**Published by:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

## Abstract

RELAP5/ MOD2 simulations of the critical flow of saturated steam are reported together with simulations of the critical flow of subcooled liquid and a low quality two-phase mixture. The experiments which were simulated used nozzle diameters of 0.3 m and 0.5 m. RELAP5 overpredicted the experimental flow rates by 10 to 25 percent unless discharge coefficients were applied.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
No. 82-5723.

#### Anderson *v.*New Jersey.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph W. Kaufmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 17, 2004          /s/ Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Joseph W. Kaufmann
                                 Chief Executive Officer



                                       40
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906
     of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  ----------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of eXmailit.com (Registrant)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert Gardner, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bet of my
knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of Registrant.



Date: March 27, 2003    /s/ Robert Gardner
                          ---------------------------------------------
                          Chief Financial Officer of
			        Registrant
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 153 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 153

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor the work of Dr. 
  Michael Ellis DeBakey, who helped develop the mobile army surgical 
                   hospital, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

Mr. Al Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor the work of Dr. 
  Michael Ellis DeBakey, who helped develop the mobile army surgical 
                   hospital, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Michael E. DeBakey Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) Dr. Michael E. DeBakey was widely considered to be one 
        of the greatest surgeons ever, according to the Journal of the 
        American Medical Association;
            (2) his surgical inventions, such as the roller pump, which 
        is a component of the heart-lung machine used in open-heart 
        surgery, continue to save countless lives;
            (3) Dr. DeBakey's surgical innovations, for example the use 
        of Dacron grafts for damaged arteries, revolutionized the 
        practice of medicine nationally and globally;
            (4) his commitment to military medicine helped shape the 
        creation of the mobile army surgical hospital or MASH unit, and 
        a medical program for returning veterans; and
            (5) Dr. DeBakey was consulted regarding the health of 
        several world leaders, including President Boris N. Yeltsin 
        during the cold war.

SEC. 3. MICHAEL E. DEBAKEY STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to honor the work of Dr. Michael Ellis 
DeBakey, who helped develop the mobile army surgical hospital, the 
Postmaster General shall provide for the issuance of a forever stamp 
suitable for that purpose that depicts Dr. Michael E. DeBakey.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``forever 
stamp'' means a definitive stamp which meets the postage required for 
first-class mail up to one ounce in weight, and which retains full 
validity for that purpose even if the rate of that postage is later 
increased.
    (c) Effective Date.--The stamp described in subsection (a) shall be 
issued beginning as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### *C. W.*OLDHAM and wife v. THE MECHANICS' BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION.

(See the Syllabus in the preceding case.)

Civil actioN, for the cancellation of a mortgage and for an account, and also praying for an injunction, heard before *Kerr,*</., at Chambers in the county of New' HaNoveb, on the 6th day of March, 1875.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the ease of *Smith and wife*v. *The Mechanics' Building da Loan*
      *379
      *Association,*(the same defendant,) and the same orders were made by bis Honor, the presiding Judge.

From the order, vacating the restraining the order and refusing to grant the injunction prayed for, the plaintiff appealed.

*Strange, London*and *French,*for appellant.

*Smith di Strong, Fowle*and *Batchelor,*contra.

PeaesoN, O. J.

Same opinion as in *Smith*v. Mechanics’ *Building & Loan Association.*

Error, and judgment according to that opinion, which will be certified.

Per Curiam.

Order reversed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Shackleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/S/ JOHN SHACKLETONJohn ShackletonPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: February 3, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

|
|



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the
Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irik P. Sevin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                      |  |                                                                                       
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|                 |  |  | 
|January 29, 2004 |  |  |  | By:                                                                                 |  | /s/    Irik P. Sevin
|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                      | 
|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                     |  |                      |  | Irik P. Sevin Chief Executive Officer Star Gas Partners, L.P. Star Gas Finance Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 6/26/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                       9,666,494
<SECURITIES>                                12,073,738
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,028,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                   198,801
<INVENTORY>                                 14,875,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,091,953
<PP&E>                                       7,613,021
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,088,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,408,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,702,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,192,013
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,504,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,408,726
<SALES>                                     14,269,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,269,719
<CGS>                                        5,902,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,902,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,713,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,339,855
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,373,179
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
#### In re PLASTIC DYNAMICS CORP., Debtor. GURIT A. G., Plaintiff, v. PLASTIC DYNAMICS CORP., and William C. Miller, Jr., Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 81-03349 T.

Adv. No. 81-1430.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 16, 1982.

Dale E. Lapp, Lancaster, Pa., for plaintiff.

Jacques Geisenberger, Jr., Lancaster, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case is before us on debtor’s objections to creditor’s notice of voluntary dismissal of a complaint. For reasons hereinafter given, we will dismiss the debtor’s objections and allow the creditor to voluntarily dismiss its complaint.1

On July 29, 1981, the creditor, Gurit A.G. (hereinafter, Gurit), filed an action against the debtor, Plastic Dynamics Corporation (hereinafter, Plastic Dynamics) and its stock holder, William C. Miller, Jr., in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. On August 21, 1981, Plastic Dynamics filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, listing Gurit as a creditor. William C. Miller filed preliminary objections to the state court proceeding. Plastic Dynamics filed a notice of removal of the action from the Lancaster County Court to this Court on September 21, 1981. On October 9, 1981, Gurit filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action. *343Gurit also filed a proof of claim in the amount of four hundred thousand, two hundred twenty dollars ($400,220.00). Plastic Dynamics filed an application for a hearing to determine the effects of the notice of dismissal and the issue was submitted to the Court on briefs.

This case is governed by Bankruptcy Rule 741 and Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 741 provides that Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies to the dismissal of adversary proceedings Rule 41(a)(1) states in pertinent part:

> [An] action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of Court (1) by filing a Notice of Dismissal at any time before service by the adversary party of an Answer or of a Motion for Summary Judgment, whichever first occurs. . . Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1)

In the case before us, Gurit gave notice of dismissal before any responsive pleading had been filed by Plastic Dynamics. The fact that the co-defendant, William C. Miller, Jr., did file preliminary objections does not join the issue as between Gurit and Plastic Dynamics. Gurit has an absolute right to file a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) until a responsive pleading by Plastic Dynamics, in effect, locks it into the litigation. Plastic Dynamics has indicated that it wishes to assert counter claims to Gurit’s complaint and is opposing the dismissal for this reason only. We note that Gurit has submitted itself to the jurisdiction of this Court by filing a proof of claim against Plastic Dynamics. Plastic Dynamics may initiate adversary proceedings against Gurit before us by filing its own complaint.

For these reasons, we deny Plastic Dynamics’ application and allow the voluntary dismissal of Gurit’s complaint.

1

. This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 752 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
                        TO POINT WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION
                   AMENDED AND RESTATED 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN


A.       The first  sentence  of Section  3(a) of the Plan is amended to read in
         its entirety as follows:

                  Subject to Section  6, the number of Common  Shares  issued or
                  transferred  upon  exercise  of  Options,  plus the  number of
                  Common Shares covered by outstanding Options, shall not in the
                  aggregate exceed 1,070,000 Common Shares,  which may be Common
                  Shares of original  issuance or Common Shares held in treasury
                  or a combination thereof.


         A new  subsection  (c) shall be added to  Section 3 of the Plan,  which
         subsection shall read in its entirety as follows:

                  (c)  Notwithstanding  anything in this Section 3 or, elsewhere
                  in this Plan to the  contrary  and  subject to  adjustment  as
                  provided  in Section 6, no Optionee  shall be granted  Options
                  for more than 100,000 Common Shares during any calendar year.
Exhibit 10.85

LOGO

Delivered in Person

February 25, 2009

John Tran

Dear John:

As you know, given the macro economic climate and resulting impact on company operations, many corporations have scaled back and even
eliminated 2008 bonus programs as was the decision by Anesivas Board of Directors. However, in recognition of the continued commitment of its people to the success of the company, the Board has adopted a retention bonus plan for 2009. Anesiva,
Inc. (the Company) is pleased to offer you an initial bonus payment in the amount equal to Sixteen Thousand Dollars ($16,000.00) to be earned and payable on March 1, 2009. Additional stay bonuses are planned for May and June under
similar terms subject to subsequent Board approval.

In the event that you voluntarily resign from employment with the Company before
May 1, 2009, you agree that you will repay to the Company this retention bonus amount paid to you pursuant to this letter. Any repayment under this paragraph must be repaid within thirty (30) days following your last date of employment
with the Company. In the event that you are involuntarily terminated from employment with the Company, you will not be liable for repayment of the retention bonus.

As a reminder, your employment with the Company continues to be at will, as described in your original Offer Letter. This retention bonus and letter does not change any other terms of your Offer Letter.

We hope that you find the foregoing terms acceptable. Please indicate your agreement with these terms by signing and dating below.



Sincerely,/s/ Michael L. KrandaMichael L. Kranda President and Chief Executive
Officer


I have read, accept and agree to, the terms of this agreement.



|                 |  |  |  |        
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------
|/s/ John H. Tran |  |  |  | 2/25/09
|Name             |  |  |  | Date   

HEADQUARTERS:

650 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080  PHONE (650) 624-9600  FAX (650) 624-7540

WWW.ANESIVA.COM
No. 82-5579.

#### Matthews *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

p1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145461

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145461

COA: 309642 

Calhoun CC: 2011-002872-FH

JUSTIN ESTEL REDMOND,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.