Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices 3989 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 

823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 

1301.33, the above-named company is 

granted registration as a bulk 

manufacturer of the basic classes of 

controlled substances listed: 

Controlled 

substance Schedule 

Marihuana (7360) ......................... I 

Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) ..... I 

Cocaine (9041) ............................. II 

The company will manufacture 

marihuana and cocaine derivatives for 

use by their customers in analytical kits, 

reagents, and reference standards as 

directed by the National Institute on 

Drug Abuse. 

Dated: January 9, 2015. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01301 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. DEA–392] 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances Registration: Noramco, 

Inc. 

ACTION: Notice of registration. 

SUMMARY: Noramco, Inc. applied to be 

registered as a manufacturer of certain 

basic classes of controlled substances. 

The DEA grants Noramco, Inc. 

registration as a manufacturer of those 

controlled substances. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

By notice dated January 14, 2014, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

January 22, 2014, 79 FR 3627, Noramco, 

Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801–4417, 

applied to be registered as a 

manufacturer of certain basic classes of 

controlled substances. No comments or 

objections were submitted to this notice. 

The Drug Enforcement Administration 

(DEA) has considered the factors in 21 

U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the 

registration of Noramco, Inc. to 

manufacture the basic classes of 

controlled substances is consistent with 

the public interest and with United 

States obligations under international 

treaties, conventions, or protocols in 

effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA 

investigated the company’s maintenance 

of effective controls against diversion by 

inspecting and testing the company’s 

physical security systems, verifying the 

company’s compliance with state and 

local laws, and reviewing the company’s 

background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 

823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 

1301.33, the above-named company is 

granted registration as a bulk 

manufacturer of the basic classes of 

controlled substances listed: 

Controlled substance Schedule 

Codeine-N-oxide (9053) ............... I 

I=≥01≥≤Dihydromorphine (9145) .. I 

Morphine-N-oxide (9307) ............. I 

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II 

Phenylacetone (8501) .................. II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Oripavine (9330) ........................... II 

Thebaine (9333) ........................... II 

Opium extracts (9610) .................. II 

Opium fluid extract (9620) ............ II 

Opium tincture (9630) .................. II 

Opium, powdered (9639) ............. II 

Opium, granulated (9640) ............ II 

Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II 

Noroxymorphone (9668) .............. II 

Tapentadol (9780) ........................ II 

The company plans to manufacture 

the listed controlled substances in bulk 

for distribution to its customers. 

Dated: January 9, 2015. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01303 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1680] 

Offender Tracking Systems Market 

Survey 

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, 

DOJ. 

ACTION: Notice of Request for 

Information. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) is soliciting information in 

relation to the upcoming National 

Criminal Justice Research, Test, and 

Evaluation Center (NIJ RT&E Center) 

‘‘Market Survey of Location-based 

Offender Tracking Technologies.’’ This 

market survey will be published by NIJ 

to assist prospective agencies in their 

assessment of relevant information on 

commercially available offender 

tracking systems (OTS) marketed for use 

by the criminal justice community, prior 

to making purchasing decisions. The NIJ 

RT&E Center invites comments with 

regard to the market survey, including 

which categories of information are 

appropriate for comparison. Vendors of 

such technology are also invited to 

provide promotional material (e.g., slick 

sheet) and images of the technology 

(e.g., a print-quality photograph). 

DATES: Responses to this request will be 

accepted through 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on February 25, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Responses to this request 

may be submitted electronically in the 

body of or as an attachment to an email 

sent to administrator@nijrtecenter.org 

with the recommended subject line 

‘‘OTS Federal Register Response’’. 

Questions and responses may also be 

sent by mail (please allow additional 

time for processing) to the address: 

National Criminal Justice Research, Test 

and Evaluation Center, ATTN: OTS 

Federal Register Response, Johns 

Hopkins University Applied Physics 

Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, 

Mail Stop 17N444, Laurel, MD 20723– 

6099. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

more information on this request for 

information contact Steven Taylor (NIJ 

RT&E Center) at (443) 778–9348 or 

administrator@nijrtecenter.org. For 

more information on the NIJ RT&E 

Center, visit http://nij.gov/funding/

awards/Pages/awarddetail.aspx?award=2013-MU-CX-K111 

and view the description or contact Jack 

Harne, by telephone at 202–616–2911 or 

by email at Jack.Harne@usdoj.gov. 

Please note that these are not toll-free 

telephone numbers. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Information Sought: The NIJ RT&E 

Center seeks input to its upcoming 

‘‘Market Survey of Location-based 

Offender Tracking Technologies.’’ This 

technology, consisting of hardware and 

software component, is designed to 

determine and report at programmed 

intervals the geographic location at a 

particular time of an individual who is 

subject to criminal justice system 

supervision. Whether an agency faces a 

mandate to track domestic violence or 

sex offenders, has a need to more 

closely monitor higher risk offenders, or 

is looking for confinement alternatives 

for low-risk offenders, this technology 

can often be a practical tool for 

supervising and managing select 

individuals. 

This market survey will be published 

by NIJ to assist prospective agencies in 

their assessment of relevant information 

on commercially available OTS 

marketed for use by the criminal justice 

community, prior to making purchasing 

decisions. Vendors who respond to this 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3990 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices 

request for information are invited to 

provide general comments with regard 

to the market survey for the NIJ RT&E 

Center to consider, including which 

categories of information are 

appropriate for comparison, as well as 

promotional material (e.g., slick sheet) 

and images of the technology (e.g., a 

print-quality photograph). 

The NIJ RT&E Center intends to 

include, at a minimum, the following 

categories of information for each 

vendor and OTS model, service, or 

product: 

1. Vendor Information 

a. Name 

b. Years your company has been in 

business 

2. Product Information 

a. Types of equipment or products 

that are offered (e.g., new, used, 

refurbished, leased, etc.) 

b. Name and model number (e.g., 

device, monitoring software 

application, home monitoring unit, 

etc.) 

c. Multi-piece or one-piece 

configuration 

d. Physical dimensions (height X 

width X depth, in inches) of device 

(with strap, and included battery) or 

component 

e. Weight (in ounces) of device with 

strap and included battery 

f. Depth to which device is waterproof 

(in feet) 

g. Type of tracking (e.g., active, 

passive, or hybrid) 

h. Location where system stores zone 

and schedule information (e.g., 

onboard or monitoring software 

application) 

i. Location on the body where the 

device is worn 

j. Battery discharge time (hours of 

continuous operation before 

needing a charge) 

k. Battery shelf life (in months) 

l. Battery recharge time (hours 

required to fully charge battery after 

complete discharge) 

m. Battery replacement procedure and 

where it must be done (e.g., field or 

factory) 

n. Availability of supplemental 

charger for emergency battery 

charging (e.g., hand crank, backup 

battery, solar, etc.) 

o. Onboard memory storage (quantity 

of data that can be stored on device 

in number of files/alerts/days 

activity) 

p. Frequencies on which the device 

components operate (cite FCC part 

number) 

q. Type(s) of technology used to geolocate the offender (e.g., GPS, WiFi, 

RF, cellular triangulation, etc.) 

r. Mechanism by which data is 

transmitted to the monitoring 

software (e.g., cellular, WiFi, 

landline, etc.) 

s. Auxiliary equipment (e.g., car 

chargers, emergency chargers, 

beacons, etc.) 

t. Manufacturer suggested retail price, 

without optional features, 

accessories or service plans 

u. Type and duration of warranty 

provided on the device(s) that you 

offer (e.g., what is covered in a 

standard warranty vs. what is 

covered in an optional or extended 

warranty) 

v. Means and frequency of monitoring 

center and monitoring software 

application backup 

w. Length of time data is retained in 

archives (in years) 

x. Any additional information not 

covered above 

3. Usability 

a. Types of processes used to ensure 

usability of hardware and software 

products (e.g., requirements 

gathering, observation, task 

analysis, interaction design, 

usability testing, ergonomics, etc.) 

b. Types of data gathered from the 

user community (e.g., interviews, 

observations during hands-on 

training, survey, satisfaction 

surveys, repeat customers, etc.) to 

evaluate your products, and how 

often it is collected 

c. Types of user-group meetings and 

frequency of their occurrence 

d. Types of embedded templates 

supported by software (e.g., new 

offender, alert types, etc.) 

e. Hours of technology support and 

location (e.g., telephone or at 

agency) 

f. Hours of operation of monitoring 

center 

g. Hours and type of training provided 

(e.g., on-site, web-based, prerecorded, play environment etc.) 

h. Types of post-training help and 

tutorials available 

4. Features and Functions 

a. Maximum number of tracking 

devices that can be concurrently 

monitored by the monitoring/

tracking software 

b. Number of data points per minute 

at which data: 

i. Is collected by the device 

ii. Is reported to the monitoring 

software 

c. Type of interoperability embedded 

in the design of the data and device 

output (e.g., other vendor software, 

other vendor devices, data 

standards with which the output is 

compliant, etc.) 

d. Types of alerts (e.g., exclusion zone 

or schedule violations, strap tamper 

or bracelet removal, low battery, 

loss of signal, communication 

failure, etc.) and way they are 

differentiated (e.g., do all alerts 

come up ‘‘Alert’’ or ‘‘Cause + 

Alert’’) 

e. Types of communication alerts to 

offenders (e.g., light, vibration, twoway communication, etc.) 

f. Single or multiple mechanisms for 

tamper detection of device or strap 

circumvention 

g. Types of acknowledgement by 

offender of an alert (e.g., one-way/ 

two-way communications for 

offender, telephone, etc.) 

h. Ability to notify/alert victims of 

domestic violence 

i. Types of mobile monitoring 

software applications to transmit 

alerts to personnel in the field 

j. Types of analytical capabilities to 

check tracking (e.g., crime-scene 

correlation, offender congregation, 

time and duration differentiators, 

etc.) 

k. Types of real-time monitoring 

features (e.g., monitored offender’s 

location can be ascertained on 

demand) 

l. Types of reports that are available 

(e.g., standard information 

examples, extent that reports are 

customizable, inclusion of maps, 

etc.) 

m. Types of on-demand custom 

reports 

n. Other unique features not covered 

above 

5. Performance and Security 

a. Average time to install and activate 

device (in minutes) 

b. Range in performance of locational 

accuracy indoor and outdoor (in 

feet) 

c. False positive (alert generated when 

it should not have been) and false 

negative (alert was not generated 

when it should have been) rates 

d. Mean time to failure 

e. Minimum data collection rate (e.g., 

once/minute) 

f. Minimum number of data storage, 

in days, (e.g., seven, ten, or fourteen 

days) 

g. Mean length of time from alert to 

notification 

h. Security mechanisms against GPS 

or communication channel 

jamming, shielding, interception, or 

spoofing 

i. Data protection mechanism while in 

transit and during storage (e.g., SSL, 

encryption, password strength, etc.) 

j. Types of database change record 

maintenance practices for historical 

data 

k. Mechanism for maintaining 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices 3991 

confidentiality of personally 

identifiable information about the 

individual being monitored 

William J. Sabol, 

Acting Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics 

and National Institute of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2015–01235 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0125] 

On-site Consultation Programs; 

Extension of the Office of Management 

and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of 

Information Collection (Paperwork) 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Request for public comments. 

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public 

comments concerning its proposal to 

extend OMB approval of the 

information collection requirements 

contained in the Standard addressing 

On-site Consultation Programs (29 CFR 

part 1908). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

(postmarked, sent, or received) by 

March 27, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: 

Electronically: You may submit 

comments and attachments 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

instructions online for submitting 

comments. 

Facsimile: If your comments, 

including attachments, are not longer 

than 10 pages you may fax them to the 

OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: When 

using this method, you must submit 

your comments and attachments to the 

OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. 

OSHA–2011–0125, Occupational Safety 

and Health Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Room N–2625, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries 

(hand, express mail, messenger, and 

courier service) are accepted during the 

Department of Labor’s and Docket 

Office’s normal business hours, 8:15 

a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include the Agency name and the OSHA 

docket number (OSHA–2011–0125) for 

the Information Collection Request 

(ICR). All comments, including any 

personal information you provide, are 

placed in the public docket without 

change, and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

For further information on submitting 

comments see the ‘‘Public 

Participation’’ heading in the section of 

this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

Docket: To read or download 

comments or other material in the 

docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov 

or the OSHA Docket Office at the 

address above. All documents in the 

docket (including this Federal Register 

notice) are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index; however, 

some information (e.g., copyrighted 

material) is not publicly available to 

read or download from the Web site. All 

submissions, including copyrighted 

material, are available for inspection 

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. 

You may also contact Patrick Showalter 

at the address below to obtain a copy of 

the ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Showalter, Director, Office of 

Small Business Assistance, Directorate 

of Cooperative and State Programs, 

OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 

N–3660, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 

693–2220. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Department of Labor, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, 

conducts a preclearance process to 

provide the public with an opportunity 

to comment on proposed and 

continuing information collection 

requirements in accord with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This 

program ensures that information is in 

the desired format, reporting burden 

(time and costs) is minimal, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

OSHA’s estimate of the information 

collection burden is accurate. The 

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 

1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et 

seq.) authorizes information collection 

by employers as necessary or 

appropriate for enforcement of the OSH 

Act or for developing information 

regarding the causes and prevention of 

occupational injuries, illnesses, and 

accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act 

also requires that OSHA obtain such 

information with minimum burden 

upon employers, especially those 

operating small businesses, and to 

reduce to the maximum extent feasible 

unnecessary duplication of efforts in 

obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657). 

Section 7(c)(1) of the OSH Act 

authorizes the Secretary of Labor to, 

‘‘with the consent of any State or 

political subdivision thereof, accept and 

use the services, facilities, and 

personnel of any agency of such State or 

subdivision with reimbursement.’’ 

Section 21(c) of the OSH Act authorizes 

the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) to, 

‘‘consult with and advise employers and 

employees . . . as to effective means of 

preventing occupational illnesses and 

injuries.’’ 

Additionally, Section 21(d) of the 

OSH Act instructs the Secretary to 

‘‘establish and support cooperative 

agreements with the States under which 

employers subject to the Act may 

consult with State personnel with 

respect to the application of 

occupational safety and health 

requirements under the Act or under 

State plans approved under section 18 

of the Act.’’ This gives the Secretary 

authority to enter into agreements with 

the States to provide on-site 

consultation services, and establish 

rules under which employers may 

qualify for an inspection exemption. To 

satisfy the intent of these and other 

sections of the OSH Act, OSHA codified 

the terms that govern cooperative 

agreements between OSHA and State 

governments whereby State agencies 

provide on-site consultation services to 

private employers to assist them in 

complying with the requirements of the 

OSH Act. The terms were codified as 

the Consultation Program regulations 

(29 CFR part 1908). 

The On-site Consultation Program 

regulations specify services to be 

provided, and practices and procedures 

to be followed by the State On-site 

Consultation Programs. Information 

collection requirements set forth in the 

On-site Consultation Program 

regulations are in two categories: State 

Responsibilities and Employer 

Responsibilities. Eight regulatory 

provisions require information 

collection activities by the State. The 

Federal government provides 90 percent 

of the funds for on-site consultation 

services delivered by the States, which 

result in the information collection. 

Four requirements apply to employers 

and specify conditions for receiving the 

free consultation services. 

II. Special Issues for Comment 

OSHA has a particular interest in 

comments on the following issues: 

• Whether the proposed information 

collection requirements are necessary 

for the proper performance of the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES