alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Seyed Ebrahim HEJAZI, Debtor. Robert LA CHANCE, Appellant, v. Seyed Ebrahim HEJAZI, Appellee.

BAP No. NC-81-1239 EVK.

Bankruptcy No. 580-03748-M.

Adv. No. 810091.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panels of the Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1982.

Before ELLIOTT, VOLINN and KATZ, Bankruptcy Judges:

ORDER

The appellant petitions for rehearing of our dismissal of his appeal. Our dismissal was based upon appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 9 of the Ninth Circuit Appellate Panel Rules, specifically his failure to include in the excerpts of the trial record the complaint and answer, the pre-trial order, if any, the judgment or order from *609which the appeal is taken, any supporting opinion or findings of fact and conclusions of law, etc.

Appellant claims to have been mislead by *A Manual For Litigants and Their Attorneys,*furnished by the clerk’s office of the Appellate Panel. At Page 5 of the Manual, it is pointed out that counsel, in lieu of the clerk of the trial court, is required to prepare and furnish excerpts of the record that are relevant to appellant’s case. The statement is made in the Manual that “You decide what is needed by the appellate panel judges to understand your position and to rule in your favor.” Examples are given on the same page. “Four copies of all relevant pleadings, memoranda, findings, orders, judgments and other documents that you want the panel to consider must be filed.”

We are mystified by counsel’s apparent belief that the appellate panel can review an order or judgment of the ■ trial court without having before it, at a minimum, the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and the judgment and order appealed from.

In any event, at Page 8 of the Manual the parties and their attorneys are advised that appeals to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panels are governed by:

> a. Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, R801-814.

> b. Interim Bankruptcy Rules, R 8001-8007.

> c. Local Rules of the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panels of the Ninth Circuit.

Rule 9 of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Rules states that the appellant *shall*include the following documents, among others, in appellant’s excerpts of the record: complaint and answer, the judgment or order appealed from, any supporting opinion, findings of fact and conclusions of law. The specific requirements of rules of court control over any generalized description of practice and procedure. It is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
No. 82-5753.

#### McCruiston *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 86-6106.

#### Chapman *v.*South Carolina Tax Commission et al.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. S. C. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
No. 90-6065.

#### Richardson *v.*City of South Euclid, Ohio, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

######  National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAMS Small Grant Program for New Investigators (R03).                    

*Date:*                         February 18-19, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Xincheng Zheng, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4838,                         *xincheng.zheng@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 16, 2015.

Carolyn Baum, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-01084 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7699
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAY LEE CASON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00005-LHT; 1:06-cv-00301) Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 23, 2008 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ray Lee Cason, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ray Lee Cason seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). AccordBowles v. Russell , 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 25, 2007. In a September 11, 2007, order, the court reopened the time for filing an appeal for fourteen days following the entry of the order. The notice of appeal was filed on November 19, 2007, after the reopened appeal period expired. Because Cason failed to file a timely notice of appeal and no authority permits the court to further extend or reopen the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.(the “Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ Dennis J Tietz  President of CCC  (Chief Executive Officer)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM THE 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS WNTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-1997               
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1997               
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1997               
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,487,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,561,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,085,257
<PP&E>                                         4,329,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,084,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,414,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,421,400
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,565
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,248,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,414,321
<SALES>                                        1,849,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          1,512,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,025,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             55,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (591,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (688,764)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# (^^^^u^i^-' ^ \^5f^^ , e ^ ^<-^^. c

S-^G , Mayo r an d Counci l Member s Chery l Viegas-Walke r Efrai n Silv a Sedali aSander s Jo n A . Edne y Benjami n Jame s Solomo n II I

% 

### i l Octobe r

19 , 201 0 Denni s J . IDeVan

y Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAve , S E Waslilngton , D.C . 2059 0 — (



### ' 0 e n ^-—

^ o 1 m^jnT *

Dea rMr . DeVany : Than k yo u fo ryou rlette rdate d Septembe r23 , 201 0 regardin g th e result s o f essentia l ai rservice proposal s receive d fo rE l Centro/Imperial , California . A t it s meetin g o n Octobe r5 , th e E l Centr o Cit yCounci l unanimousl y expresse d it s suppor

t o f th e proposa l submitte d b ySkyWest . Comment

s by counci l member

s indicate d a preference fo rai rtrave l to/fro m Lo s Angele s rathe rtha n San Diego . There was als o som e concer n regardin g th e siz e o f th e aircraft propose d bySeaPor t Th e Cit yo f E l Centr

o value s th e availabl e ai rservice s a t th e Imperia l Count y Airpor t an d appreciate s th e opportunityt o commen t o n th e proposals . I f yo u have an yquestion , pleas e 6 o no t hesitat e t o giv e m e a call . Sincerely , 

### ^ *^«,^^-*^sC::ci§5«->s . Chery l Viegas

^ Mayo r



### E l Centr o Cit

y Hal l 127 5 Mai n Street , E l Centro , C A 9224 3 (760 ) 337-454 0 Fa x (760 ) 352-617 7
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1678 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1678

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act concerning the statute of limitations for actions to 
   recover disaster or emergency assistance payments, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2017

    Ms. Frankel of Florida (for herself and Mr. Webster of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
  Assistance Act concerning the statute of limitations for actions to 
   recover disaster or emergency assistance payments, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 705(a)(1) of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5205(a)(1)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Except'' and inserting ``Notwithstanding 
        section 3716(e) of title 31, United States Code, and except''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``report for the disaster or emergency'' 
        and inserting ``report for project completion as certified by 
        the grantee''.
    (b) Applicability.--
            (1) In general.--With respect to disaster or emergency 
        assistance provided to a State or local government on or after 
        January 1, 2004--
                    (A) no administrative action may be taken to 
                recover a payment of such assistance after the date of 
                enactment of this Act if the action is prohibited under 
                section 705(a)(1) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
                5205(a)(1)), as amended by subsection (a); and
                    (B) any administrative action to recover a payment 
                of such assistance that is pending on such date of 
                enactment shall be terminated if the action is 
                prohibited under section 705(a)(1) of that Act, as 
                amended by subsection (a).
            (2) Limitation.--This section, including the amendments 
        made by this section, may not be construed to invalidate or 
        otherwise affect any administration action completed before the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Garrett, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 530]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered November 4, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s complaints with respect to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 399).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit *(see, People v Rua,*198 AD2d 311, 312; *People v Gaines,*212 AD2d 727). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5828-N-04]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 402-3970; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: January 15, 2015.

Brian P. Fitzmaurice,

Director, Division of Community Assistance, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 2015-00890 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DOD Officials Unveil COVID-Related Personnel, Move Guidance

By Jim GaramoneDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News