alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex41.htm


EXHIBIT 4.1







 


 


AHIMSA CAPITAL CORP.


 


A FLORIDA CORPORATION


 


100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE












This certifies that _________________________________________________ is hereby issued ____________________________________________________ fully paid and non-assessable Shares of Common Stock of Ahimsa Capital Corp., transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.







In Witness Whereof, Ahimsa Capital Corp. has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed as of this ______ day of __________________ 20_____.


 


 




____________________________                                                                            __________________________________


President                                                                                                                             Secretary
No. 91-6098.

#### Toro Aristizabal *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Jerome Stallone, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Corrections, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 96]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting threats, harassment and refusal of a direct order as a result of his disorderly behavior during a prison disciplinary hearing on unrelated charges. Petitioner contends, *inter alia,*that no misconduct occurred and that respondent failed to abide by applicable rules and regulations in conducting the hearing. Initially, we do not find any procedural infirmities in the manner in which the hearing was conducted. Moreover, we find that the misbehavior report prepared by the Hearing Officer who conducted the hearing, as well as the testimony of the Hearing Officer and a correction officer who was summoned to remove petitioner from the hearing room, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt. We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             764
<SECURITIES>                                    10,854
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                       229
<INVENTORY>                                      1,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,138
<PP&E>                                           1,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                     667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               74
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,202
<SALES>                                          2,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,685
<CGS>                                            1,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,092)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,092)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             59,873
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       1,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     4,439,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,500,550
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,500,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,521,304
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (20,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,500,550
<SALES>                                         9,153,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,160,230
<CGS>                                           8,240,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,240,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  380,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   539,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               539,806
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      539,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Denver Thompson, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 689]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elbert Hinkson, J.), rendered June 8, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence at the suppression hearing was that two uniformed police officers responded to a radio call from a foot patrol officer of shots fired from the roof of a nearby building, that upon arrival there minutes later they were met by the officer as well as four civilians who also heard the shots, that the officers searched the building and encountered defendant on the top floor landing, that defendant appeared very nervous and made gestures and adjustments to his waistband area even after he had been specifically told to stop, and that the officers grabbed defendant’s hand and seized from his waistband area a loaded semiautomatic pistol. There is no merit to defendant’s claim that the suppression court erred in crediting this -testimony of the two officers, and in concluding, upon the basis of it, that they possessed sufficient information to justify their seizure of the gun *(People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267, 271; *People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# Note to Editors: ACRS Meetings Scheduled

----

----

No. 99-66 April 5, 1999

**NOTE TO EDITORS:**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has scheduled meetings of four of its subcommittees in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittees on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment and on regulatory policies and practices will meet jointly on April 21.

The subcommittee on plant license renewal will meet on April 28-29, followed by a meeting of the subcommittee on severe accident management on April 30.

At the first joint subcommittee meeting, members will discuss staff reconciliation of public comments on performance-based initiatives and the plan for pursuing those initiatives. Also to be discussed is NUREG/CR-5393, "Elements of an Approach to Performance-Based Regulatory Oversight."

At the plant license renewal subcommittee meeting, members will review the NRC staff's safety evaluation report concerning the Calvert Cliffs plant license renewal application.

At the severe accident management subcommittee meeting, members will discuss the Westinghouse Owners Group's proposed revisions to the core damage assessment guidelines and the post accident sampling system requirements for Westinghouse Electric Company nuclear plants.

All meetings will be held in room T-2B3 of the agency's Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The first meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and last until the conclusion of business. The second meeting (on April 28) will begin at 1:00 and the third and fourth meetings will begin at 8:30 a.m.

Other aspects of the meetings, including opportunities for comment, will be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                  747,087
<SECURITIES>                                                          1,471,674
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         2,164,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                              57,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      4,862,111
<PP&E>                                                                  329,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        7,878,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 2,977,199
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                  6,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            4,492,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          7,878,843
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      9,968,019
<CGS>                                                                 5,075,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      4,198,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         769,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            273,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     380,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            380,868
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .07


</TABLE>
fp0002383_agencyagt4.htm


 



Agreement No.__________









 


Agency Agreement

















Shaanxi Baishui Dukang Brand Management Co., Ltd.









  





  











  






 


AGENCY AGREEMENT







Party A: Shaanxi Baishui Dukang Brand Management Co., Ltd.


Party B: Ms. Xue,  Aixian   ID card No.:   612101195412020826


 


In view of that Party B agrees to renewal the nationwide franchise buyout of the products of Party A — “Baishui Dukang · Refined Liquor” which has already circulated in the market, Party A and B have reached an agreement through friendly consultation to conclude the following contract:








	
1.  

	
Party B buy out the nationwide franchise of the products of Party A — “Baishui Dukang · Refined Liquor” which has already circulated in the market.








	
2.  

	
The term of the buyout is from October. 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. When the agreement terminates and Party B is willing to renewal it, Party B owns the rights to first renew the agreement.








	
3.  

	
The fee for the buyout is for RMB 700,000 (RMB seven hundred thousand yuan), 50% of the fee shall be paid before Nov. 30, the remaining 50% of it shall be paid before March 15, otherwise there shall be an overdue fine for 5‰ per day.








	
4.  

	
During the period of the buyout, Party A shall guarantee the requirements of Party B for products and ensure that the product quality should meet the national quality standards.








	
5.  

	
During the period of the buyout, Party B shall in charge of the product sales network of Party A, and Party A can not sell any of the buyout products.








	
6.  

	
Party B assures of completing the sales target for RMB 5,000,000 during the period of the buyout, or each 10 percent decrease on the uncompleted sales target will result in 5 percent increase on the buyout fee.








	
7.  

	
The Agreement is in duplicate with the equal legal effect and each party holds one copy.














  





  











  






 



	
Party A:

	
Party B:


	
Shaanxi Baishui Dukang Brand Management Co., Ltd.

	
Ms. Xue, Aixian


	  	  
	  	  
	
Date: Sept. 28, 2009

	
Date: Sept. 28, 2009
No. 90-716.

#### Krain *v.*Johnson et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Thomas Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                    /s/ P. Thomas Jenkins
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    P. Thomas Jenkins
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 13, 2002
* The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999. He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

** The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2159

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * John J. Brestogianis, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 20, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, * Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and BOGUE, ** District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. John J. Brestogianis appeals his sentence for possession of an unregistered pipe bomb. We conclude that an extended discussion of the issues presented by this appeal willserve no useful purpose. We have carefully considered Brestogianis's contentions-2-

andfind them to be without merit. We thus affirm Brestogianis's sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1625 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to include severe forms of trafficking in persons 

within the definition of transnational organized crime 

for purposes of the rewards program of the Department 

of State, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1625 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Targeted Rewards for 

3 the Global Eradication of Human Trafficking’’ or the 

4 ‘‘TARGET Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

6 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

7 (1) Trafficking in persons is a major 

8 transnational crime that threatens United States na9 tional security and humanitarian interests. 

10 (2) Trafficking in persons is increasingly per11 petrated by organized, sophisticated criminal enter12 prises. 

13 (3) Combating trafficking in persons requires a 

14 global approach to identifying and apprehending the 

15 world’s worst human trafficking rings. 

16 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con17 gress that the Department of State’s rewards program is 

18 a powerful tool in combating sophisticated international 

19 crime and that the Department of State and Federal law 

20 enforcement should work in concert to offer rewards that 

21 target human traffickers who threaten United States na22 tional security and humanitarian interests by preying on 

23 the most vulnerable people around the world. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1625 RFS 

1 SEC. 3. REWARDS FOR JUSTICE. 

2 Paragraph (5) of section 36(k) of the State Depart3 ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(k)) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

6 by striking ‘‘means’’; 

7 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

8 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and moving 

9 such clauses, as so redesignated, two ems to the 

10 right; 

11 (3) by inserting before clause (i), as so redesig12 nated, the following: 

13 ‘‘(A) means—’’; 

14 (4) in clause (ii), as so redesignated, by striking 

15 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (5) by adding at the end following new subpara17 graph: 

18 ‘‘(B) includes severe forms of trafficking in 

19 persons, as such term is defined in section 103 

20 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

21 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection Manual

# Temporary Instruction

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 09, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE 
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002577
<NAME> T.J.T. INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              26
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,279
<PP&E>                                           2,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                     981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,671
<SALES>                                         24,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,595
<CGS>                                           20,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    670
<INCOME-TAX>                                       295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                375
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       375
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>