alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This is a dditional i nformation p ertaining to Neptune Aviation ’s Request for Exemption from 14C FR § 2 1. 197(c)
Certification Procedures for Products , Articles, and Parts, Special Flight P ermits with a continuing authorization.

In addition to citing 14C FR § 2 1. 197(c) Certification Procedures for Products, Articles, and Parts, Special flight permits with a continuing authorization, Neptune Aviation also requests consideration of 14C FR Subpart K

– Fractional Ownership Operations under § 91

. 1017 Amending Program Manager’s Management Specifications as precedence for permitting a non

- air carrier certificate holder to have the continuing authorization

, and as a basis for amending Neptune’s 14 CFR Part 137 Agricultural Aircraft Operations Specifications , Subpart B

— C ertification Rules Sec. 137.17
Amendment of certifica te to allow for company issued Special Flight P ermits with a continuing authorization.

Neptune flew a total of 2,224 hours over the 2015 fire season in support of wildfire suppression in Alaska, Britis h Columbia, Alberta, and the western U nited States . Our flight operations fall under operational control of the U.S. Forest Service in support of the USFS, BLM, DOIA , State Governments, and other governmental agencies spread throughout a very large geogra phic area. Neptune’s Large Air Tanker (LAT) fleet of 14 aircraft is operated and maintained under a military style field deployment model that requires a very high degree of mobility and latitude to operate on very short

notice.

Having an exemption all owing the company to issue Special Flight Permits for our LAT fleet will be a valuable means for Neptune to safely move an aircraft to one of our two Certificated Repair Stations for critical maintenance that cannot be performed in field, especially when i t is determined the condition does require a much more capable and safe
environment for the maintenance . The majority of the times when it is determined the aircraft requires more extensive maintenance support occurs after the local FSDO closing time of 1 6:30 hours and we cannot obtain an SFP until the next day. This leaves a national resource unavailable for a much longer period of time than could be the case.

Neptune has the staff, infrastructure, processes, procedures , and experience to properly admin ister this responsibility and believes being granted this exemption is in the best interest of public safety.
Inorganic nitrates Case 4052 Docket NumberEPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1118 Proposed Interim RegistrationReview Decisionwww.regulations.govPesticide Re-evaluation Division26Appendix BIndexCounties with Proposed Gas Cartridge Endangered Species Protection BulletinsAlabama Counties:Baldwin, Choctaw, Clarke, Marengo, Mobile, Sumter, WashingtonArizona Counties:Graham, MohaveCalifornia Counties:Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa BarbaraLouisiana:Livingston, St. Helena, St.John the Baptist, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa, WashingtonMississippi:Amite, Clarke, Covington, Forrest, George, Greene, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson Davis, Jones, Lamar, Lauderdale,Lawrence, Marion, Newton, Pearl River,Perry, Pike, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Smith, Stone, Walthall, WayneNorth Carolina:Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay,Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, Macon, Madison, McDowell,Mitchell, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, YanceyInorganic nitrates Case 4052 Docket NumberEPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1118 Proposed Interim RegistrationReview Decisionwww.regulations.govPesticide Re-evaluation Division27Tennessee:Blount, Carter, Cocke, Greene, Johnson, Monroe, Sevier, Sullivan, UnicoiUtah:Beaver, Garfield, Iron, Kane,Millard, Piute, Sanpete,Sevier, Washington, WayneVirginia:Grayson, Russell, Smyth, Washington, Wythe
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1428 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1428

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2017

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

VINSON T. BLOCKER,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-16

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 18, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

Robert J. Egan, Judge.

Vinson T. Blocker, Sneads, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of all issues raised by Vinson T. Blocker 

(“Appellant”) in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 amended motion for 

postconviction relief, save one. Under the specific facts of this case, Appellant’s dual 

convictions for dealing in stolen property and petit theft are improper. See Hall v. State, 

826 So. 2d 268, 271 (Fla. 2002) (finding that section 812.025, Florida Statutes, prohibits 

a trial court from adjudicating a defendant guilty of both theft and dealing in stolen property 

in connection with one scheme or course of conduct); Shearer v. State, 582 So. 2d 28, 
2

29 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (concluding that the petit theft of a camera and the dealing in 

stolen property of the camera committed on the same day arose out of the same course 

of conduct or scheme).

We next address the remedy. Where, as here, the jury is properly instructed under 

section 812.025 but nevertheless returns dual guilty verdicts for both theft and dealing in 

stolen property that are contrary to section 812.025, we conclude that the appropriate 

remedy is to vacate the conviction for the lesser offense of petit theft. Cf. Blackmon v. 

State, 121 So. 3d 535, 548–49, 549 n.18 (Fla. 2013) (holding that where the jury was not

properly instructed under section 812.025 but the defendant failed to request a proper 

instruction or to otherwise preserve the error for appellate review and the jury returns dual 

guilty verdicts for both theft and dealing in stolen property that are contrary to section 

812.025, the proper remedy is vacating the conviction for the lesser offense).

Lastly, based upon the trial court’s findings in the denial order that it would have 

imposed the same sentences for Appellant’s other convictions regardless of the 

“negligible” change in the scoresheet resulting if the petit theft conviction were vacated,

we deny Appellant’s request to be resentenced on his other convictions. 

Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to vacate Appellant’s 

conviction and sentence for petit theft. We affirm the postconviction court’s order in all 

other respects.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions.

PALMER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/28/2014 17:22:59

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Docket (050- 00424)

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

218

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 197 - Self-check LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 197 - Self-check LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

655

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / LER173 - Physical conditions LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations B - Bal of Plant Ops 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER198 - Worker distracted / interrupted O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

19

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 11
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 21, 2000


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2000-A


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2000-A, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv M67
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         623,710
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,435,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,059,675
<PP&E>                                         154,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,213,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        3,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     453,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,213,831
<SALES>                                        465,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               465,066
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               45,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             434,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,254)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2016

s0919 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2016

152211

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152211

COA: 321000

Wayne CC: 13

- 009215

- FC

AKEI LEVORN CHAPMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
          FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND MARCH 29, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                THREE MONTHS        THREE MONTHS
                                                                                    ENDED              ENDED
                                                                               MARCH 28, 1998      MARCH 29, 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                              <C>                 <C>       
Net income ............................................................          $1,444,560          $1,179,293
                                                                                 ==========          ==========

Common and common equivalent shares:
      Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      during the period ...............................................           5,777,666           5,631,878

      Common shares issuable upon exercise
          of outstanding stock options
               Diluted ................................................             178,647             343,797
                                                                                 ----------          ----------

      Common and common equivalent shares
          outstanding during the period
               Diluted ................................................           5,956,313           5,975,675
                                                                                 ==========          ==========

Earnings per share data
      Net income per common and common
          equivalent shares
               Basic ..................................................          $     0.25          $     0.21
               Diluted ................................................          $     0.24          $     0.20
</TABLE>



                                       16
| **Exhibit                32.1**                                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **CERTIFICATION                OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**                                                 |
| **PURSUANT                TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906                OF** |
| **THE                SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**                                                           |
|                                                                                                        |   |
|                                                                                                        | I,                Farid Shouekani, Chief Executive Officer of Viper Networks, Inc.                (the                “Small Business Issuer”) do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 1350 of Chapter                63 of                Title 18 of the United States Code that: |
|                                                                               |   |   |
|                                                                                                        | (1)      | The                Small Business Issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended                December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) to which this statement is filed as an                exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|                                                                                                        |   |   |
|                                                                                                        | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Small                Business Issuer. |
|                                                                                                        |   |

| By:*/s/                Farid Shouekani*Farid                ShouekaniChief                Executive Officer |   |                                                                                       Date:  June 1,                2006 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1



PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Photon Dynamics, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey A. Hawthorne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard
Okumoto, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by
the Report.



Dated: August 16, 2004



|                                                           |  |                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE                                   |  | /s/ RICHARD OKUMOTO                                  
|Jeffrey A. Hawthorne President and Chief
Executive Officer |  | Richard Okumoto Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT
      23.2




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







Ames
      National Corporation


Ames,
      Iowa








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-89772 on Form S-8 related to our audits of the consolidated financial
      statements, of Ames National Corporation of our report, dated January 20, 2006
      appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ames National Corporation for
      the year ended December 31, 2006.








*/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen LLP*








Des
      Moines, Iowa


March
      15, 2007
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2225

___________

Brian True, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

State of Nebraska; Robert Houston, *

Director, Department of Correctional * Appeal from the United States

Services, an Agency of the State of * District Court for the 

Nebraska; Diane Sabatka-Rine, * District of Nebraska.

Warden, Lincoln Correctional Center; *

Robert Madsen, Deputy Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Lincoln Correctional Center, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 23, 2011

Filed: October 12, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a non-jury trial, the district court1

 dismissed Brian L. True’s suit for

violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. True v. Nebraska, 2011 WL 1791353

(D.Neb. May 11, 2011), remanded by 612 F. 3d 676, 683 n.5 (8th Cir. 2010). The

1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.
district court specifically found that community custody inmates “have unsupervised

access to the [prison] parking lot,” and thus the random search of True’s vehicle was

reasonable “to keep contraband out of the institution.” True appeals.

The judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not

clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-