alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Z: \ data \ SIP \ Connecticut \ 8 hour Ozone Redesignation \ MARAMA 2025 Appendices

Name Size Type Last Modified

marama_2025_appendices.zip 4,200KB WinZip File 1/10/2013 10:57 AM

Appendix A1 AEO2010 New England.xls 274KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A2 AEO2010 Mid Atlantic.xls 277KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A3 AEO2010 South Atlantic.xls 281KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A4 AEO2011 New England.xlsx 32KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A5 AEO2011 Mid Atlantic.xlsx 33KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A6 AEO2011 South Atlantic.xlsx 34KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix A7 AEO2010 vs AEO2011 Comparison.docx 1,110KB Microsoft Office Word Document 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix B Population_Factors.xls 2,449KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix C Employment_Factors.xls 3,001KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix D VMT GF Nonattainment Counties.xlsx 23KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix E EPA2020 Res Wood.xls 41KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix F AEO2011-Electricity_Generation_by_EMM.xlsx 185KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix G UAF NEEDS Control FileMASTER92211.xls 1,544KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM

Appendix H MAR Growth and Control.xls 550KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:46 AM
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 463 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-406, K2025-404.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27205 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1547 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1547

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2017

  Ms. McSally (for herself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Franks of 
   Arizona, Mr. Biggs, Ms. Sinema, Mr. O'Halleran, and Mr. Gallego) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Udall Park Land Exchange Completion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Tucson, 
        Arizona.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 172.8-acre parcel of City land identified in 
        the patent numbered 02-90-0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and 
        more particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S\1/2\NW\1/4\, 
        sec. 5, T.14S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN LAND LOCATED IN 
              TUCSON, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, the 
reversionary interests of the United States in and to the non-Federal 
land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land 
to enable economic development of the non-Federal land.
    (b) Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the exact legal descriptions of the non-Federal 
land shall be determined in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions to the conveyance under subsection 
(a), consistent with that subsection, as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Costs.--The City shall pay all costs associated with the 
conveyance under subsection (a), consistent with that subsection, 
including the costs of any surveys, recording costs, and other 
reasonable costs.
                                 <all>
```
No. 82-5619.

#### Bancroft *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melvin DeJesus, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 659]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered May 19, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 121/2 to 25 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce the sentences *517on the convictions to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, and otherwise affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The trial court properly declined to charge entrapment, since defendant failed to set forth evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to him, to support that affirmative defense sufficiently. As stated in *People v Brown*(82 NY2d 869, 871), defendant had the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that "(1) he was actively induced or encouraged to commit the offense by a public official; and (2) such inducement or encouragement created a 'substantial risk’ that the offense would be committed by defendant who was not otherwise disposed to commit it”. While defendant’s testimony, in diverging from the People’s version of the event, created an issue of fact for the jury with respect to the first branch of the required showing *(see, People v Speros,*186 AD2d 434; *People v Fuller,*130 AD2d 840; *cf., People v Vina,*193 AD2d 770, *lv denied*82 NY2d 760), he failed to present *any*evidence to show his lack of a predisposition to commit the crimes charged. Indeed, defendant’s admitted drug use is a circumstance that has been found relevant to the willingness to participate in a drug transaction *(see, People v Caballero,*160 AD2d 810, *lv denied*76 NY2d 785, *vacated on other grounds*217 AD2d 704).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, *People v Torres*(185 AD2d 257, *lv denied*80 NY2d 977) does not suggest a different result. In *Torres,*which was a prosecution for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, there was testimony from both detectives on the case that they had never before heard either that defendant was a drug seller or that he possessed large quantities of drugs; in addition, there was detailed testimony that defendant had purchased small amounts for his personal use only.

Where the third degree possession count for which defendant was convicted is not a lesser included offense of the sale count for which he was convicted, dismissal of the possession count is not required.

Under the circumstances herein, the sentences were excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
#### Neuser, Edward (Edmund), Appellant, vs. Thelen, Respondent.

*September 12*

October *11, 1932.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *N. H. Roden*of Port Washington, attorney, and *Rouiller & Dougherty*of Milwaukee of counsel, and oral argument by *C. F. Rouiller.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Olwell & Brady, George A. Gessner,*and *John H. Schlints,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Gessner.*

*272Fowler, J.

This is a companion case to that of Theresa Neuser v. Peter Thelen and Edward Thelen, decided herewith (a*nte,*p. 262, 244 N. W. 801). The two cases involve the same collision and were tried together. This case is ruled by the opinion in the other.

*By the Court.*— The judgmént of the circuit court is affirmed.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:09:05

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Hatch 2 Docket (050- 00366)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR110 - No procedure / reference documents M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical F - Modification 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations G - Design 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations T - Testing 

417

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical F - Modification 146 - Evaluation LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

625

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical F - Modification 

182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA G - Engineering T - Testing 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering T - Testing 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical T - Testing 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering S - Surveillance 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

1042

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Oversight / LER130 - Inadequate suprevision / command and control M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:09:05

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Hatch 2 Docket (050- 00366)

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / LER147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering F - Modification 

28

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 24
In The Matter Of: COMAIR, INC. Respondent 

### SERVED: OCTOBER 1, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0318 CaseNo. 2011S0271015

ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnAugust 14, 2014, an Order Setting Rule 16litigation Scheduling Conference and Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. This Order setthe Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. Easterntime, and set October 1, 2014, as the deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan. · On September 30, 2014, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing and Answer, stating that the parties have reached a settlement and requesting thatthis proceedingbe dismissed withprejudice. Afterhaving reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant case law, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, andbeing fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 1, 2014 deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery planis cancelled. 2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for October 8, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. Easterntime is cancelled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, and this proceeding is dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service List ·. i'SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

· Federal AviationAdministration

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 ONE COPY

Federal AviationAdministration, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Robert P. Silverberg 

### Respondent's Counsel llOl 30th Street, N.W. Suite 120 Washington, DC 20007 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0318 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC--430.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1441 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1441

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to eliminate the sequestration for the revised security category under 
      section 251 and to eliminate the section 251A reduction in 
   discretionary appropriations and direct spending accounts within 
                        function 050 (defense).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2017

  Mr. Turner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
to eliminate the sequestration for the revised security category under 
      section 251 and to eliminate the section 251A reduction in 
   discretionary appropriations and direct spending accounts within 
                        function 050 (defense).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal Sequestration for Defense 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SEQUESTRATION UNDER THE REVISED SECURITY 
              CATEGORY.

    Section 251(c)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 is amended by striking each subparagraph (A) for 
fiscal years 2014 through 2021 and by redesignating each subparagraph 
(B) as subparagraph (A).

SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SECTION 251A REDUCTION IN DISCRETIONARY 
              APPROPRIATIONS AND DIRECT SPENDING ACCOUNTS FOR DEFENSE.

    Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended as follows:
            (1) In paragraph (1)(D), strike ``9'' and insert ``18''.
            (2) In paragraph (2), strike everything after ``section 
        254(c),'' and insert the following: ``OMB shall allocate the 
        total reduction calculated pursuant to paragraph (1) for that 
        year to discretionary appropriations and direct spending 
        accounts except for function 050 (defense function).''.
            (3) Strike paragraph (3).
            (4) In paragraph (5)(B), strike the dash after ``limit'', 
        strike clause (i), and strike ``(ii)'' and move that text 2 ems 
        to the left.
            (5) In paragraph (6)(A), strike ``paragraphs (3) and (4)'' 
        and insert ``paragraph (4)''.
            (6) In paragraph (6)(B), strike the dash after ``that'', 
        strike clause (i), and strike ``(ii)'' and move that text 2 ems 
        to the left.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lih-Shyng Tsai, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 28, 2015



By:

/s/ LIH-SHYNG TSAI


Name:

Lih-Shyng TsaiTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1209 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 901 N. Francisco Avenue, Mission, Texas, as the ``Mission Veterans 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MISSION VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 901 N. Francisco Avenue, Mission, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mission Veterans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mission 
Veterans Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1209

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 901 N. Francisco Avenue, Mission, Texas, as the ``Mission Veterans 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
[639 NYS2d 240]

#### In the Matter of W. Joseph Embser, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

March 8, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gerard M. LaRusso,*Buffalo *(Roderick Quebral*of counsel), for petitioner.

*David M. Franz,*Olean, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on December 3, 1962, and maintains an office in Wellsville.

The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with misappropriating estate funds and neglecting a legal matter. Respondent filed an answer and a Referee was appointed to conduct a trial and make findings of fact. The Referee has filed a report that petitioner now moves to confirm.

*157The Referee found that respondent was retained to represent the executrix of an estate and issued 50 checks against estate funds, payable to himself, for amounts totaling $399,320. Respondent signed many of those checks using a general power of attorney, including checks signed after the death of the executrix totaling over $118,000. Respondent did not enter into a retainer agreement with the executrix and did not submit any billing statements to her for his legal services. Additionally, he neither discussed with the executrix the issuance of checks payable to himself nor sought court approval for the advance payment of attorney’s fees or commissions for his services as executor of her estate for those checks issued following her death. The Referee also found that, after the executrix had died, respondent neglected the settlement of the estate of which she was executrix and benefitted from that neglect by continuing to issue checks against the estate funds, payable to himself.

We confirm the report of the Referee and reject respondent’s affirmative defense that the executrix intended to permit respondent to make unlimited payments of the estate funds to himself because of their past friendship.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (A) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]) — engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;

DR 1-102 (A) (8) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [8]) — engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law; and

DR 6-101 (A) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30 [a] [3]) — neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him.

We have considered the matters in mitigation submitted by respondent and conclude that he should be disbarred (see, *Matter of Contino,*205 AD2d 1). We also direct that respondent make restitution in the amount found by the Referee.

Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ., concur.

Order of disbarment entered.