alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00446

- CV

In re Mario

- Arnold : Yarrito

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Mario

- A rnoldo : Yarrito has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
complaining that the Travis County district clerk has failed to file certain documents in an
underlying proceeding. As an intermediate appellate court, this Court has no jurisdiction to issue
a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, see

Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221(a); In re Washington , 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.

— Houston

[1 st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding), and our jurisdiction is not implicated here

. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is dismisse d for want of jurisdiction.

____________ ______________________________ Gis ela D. Triana , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Filed: July 29 , 2022
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1487 

To prohibit use of Federal funds to apprehend, detain, or remove from 

the United States any alien who was granted deferred action under 

the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, if the alien lost 

their deferred action status solely as a direct or indirect result of any 

action taken by the President or another Federal official. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mrs. TORRES (for herself and Mr. O’ROURKE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit use of Federal funds to apprehend, detain, or 

remove from the United States any alien who was granted deferred action under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, if the alien lost their deferred 

action status solely as a direct or indirect result of any 

action taken by the President or another Federal official. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dreamer Protection 

5 Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1487 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

2 No Federal funds may be obligated or expended to 

3 apprehend, detain, or remove from the United States any 

4 alien who at any time was granted deferred action under 

5 the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program an6 nounced on June 15, 2012, if the alien lost their deferred 

7 action status solely as a direct or indirect result of any 

8 action taken by the President or any other Federal official 

9 with respect to such program, and not for any other rea10 son. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,275
<SECURITIES>                                       105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,666
<INVENTORY>                                     84,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,910
<PP&E>                                          56,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,106
<BONDS>                                         71,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,299)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,826
<SALES>                                        314,478
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,478
<CGS>                                          211,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               202,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (88)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (166,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (166,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (477)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,200
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,820)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.18)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,631
<SECURITIES>                                     4,819
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                       426
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,143
<PP&E>                                           1,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,803
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,085
<CGS>                                            2,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                       572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.17
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Karean HAILEY, Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-01950-BKC-TCB.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

Jan. 7, 1982.

Bernard Rappaport, Miami, Fla., for debtor.

Robert Roth, Miami, Fla., trustee.

*168ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION AND DISMISSING CASE

THOMAS <3. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This chapter 13 debtor is $1,580 in arrears on the first mortgage on her home, $1,140 in arrears on the second mortgage on her home and is $927 in arrears on the first mortgage on an investment duplex which she owns, but does not occupy. In addition, she owes one unsecured creditor $300.

Her plan is to maintain all current payments and cure the defaults on her home mortgages within the next 13 months. She then plans to cure the default on her investment property during the following eight months. Finally, she proposes to pay her unsecured creditor over a five month period beginning 20 months from now and ending some time in 1984.

She no longer holds the position she held when she filed this petition and presented her plan. She had held that position for one month. Her budget and her plan are based upon the continuation of the income she received when the petition was filed together with child support and rental income from the duplex, which together represent a third of her total income. She is supporting two children, one of which is in an institution.

I cannot confirm this plan because it does not comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(6). It would be totally unrealistic to assume that this debtor will be able to perform the plan she has presented.

Additionally, I do not consider that the proposal to cure the defaults on her three mortgages complies with the requirement of § 1322(b)(5), which permits provisions in the plan which:

> “... provide for the curing of any default within a reasonable time . . . ”.

I do not consider it reasonable to cure a default over a period greater than 12 months in mortgages such as the ones we have here. I consider that a reasonable time would ordinarily be between three and six months, and perhaps in extraordinary circumstances, nine or twelve months. This plan exceeds those maximum limits and, therefore, does not comply with the provisions of chapter 13. Accordingly, confirmation must also be denied under § 1325(a)(1).

No purpose would be served by granting this debtor additional time to file another plan or a- modification of this plan in view of the foregoing conclusions. This debtor has advised the court that she does not request conversion of this case to chapter 7. I find, therefore, that it would be in the best interest of creditors and the debtor to dismiss this case pursuant to § 1307(c)(4). Accordingly, this case is dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Lucille Ann D., Respondent, v David F. K., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[632 NYS2d 909]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner met her burden of establishing paternity "by 'clear and convincing’ evidence, evidence which is 'entirely satisfactory’ and creates a genuine belief that respondent is the father of the child” *(Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Patricia A.] v Philip De G.,*59 NY2d 137, 141-142). The combined red cell antigen and *875human leucocyte antigen (HLA) test, indicating a 99.7% probability of paternity, is entitled to great weight *(see, Matter of Stone v Ilardo,*191 AD2d 965). Issues of credibility are best determined by the trial court *(see, Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. [Kimmie W.] v Randy M.,*206 AD2d 878; *Matter of Harvey-Cook [Margaret W.] v Kevin X.,*204 AD2d 793, 794), and Family Court credited the testimony of petitioner that respondent was her exclusive sexual partner for the 11 months preceding the birth of the child *(see, Matter of Taiwana Y. v Benjamin Z.,*204 AD2d 790; *Fitzgerald v Tamola,*199 AD2d 122). In light of the proof that petitioner had sexual intercourse only with respondent, there was no need for medical testimony explaining the occurrence of regular menstrual periods after the apparent conception date *(see, Matter of Kaplan [Sandra LL.] v Andrew MM.,*217 AD2d 778; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. [Celia D.] v Hector S.,*216 AD2d 81; *Matter of Taiwana Y. v Benjamin Z., supra).*

The court properly granted petitioner’s objection to the order of the Hearing Examiner and awarded additional support based upon the amount of combined parental income exceeding $80,000. The court fully explained the reasons for its departure from the Hearing Examiner’s order, based upon its consideration of the factors set forth in Family Court Act § 413 (1) (f), and we find no basis to disturb the award of additional child support *(see,*Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [3]; *Matter of Cassano v Cassano,*85 NY2d 649, 655). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Morgan, J. — Child Support.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shant S. Hovnanian,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
May 15, 2006By:
/s/ Shant S.
  HovnanianName:
Shant S.
  HovnanianTitle:
Chairman of
  the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 21
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Lab Team Increases Capabilities, Postured for Future

By Senior Airman Samuel Colvin673d Air Base Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Scott & Howe Lumber Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and another, Respondents.

*May 9*

June *3, 1924.*

*Scott & Howe Lumber Co. v. Industrial Comm., ante,*p. 276, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Brown, Pradt & Genrich*of Wausau, and for the respondent *Industrial Commission*on that of the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer*Levitan, assistant attorney general.

Crownhart, J.

This case was tried before the *Industrial Commission*and the circuit court together with *Scott & Howe Lumber Co. v. Industrial Comm.,*decided herewith *{ante,*p. 276, 199 N. W. 159). The two cases were here submitted together. The facts of the two cases were substantially the same. This case is governed by the opinion in the above mentioned case.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court' is affirmed, the appellant to pay the clerk’s fees.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO OF ATARI, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atari, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Fremed, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                   By: /s/ David J. Fremed
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Name: David J. Fremed
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 13, 2003

                                    Page 38
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1362 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, 

the Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1362 EH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

3 PAGO PAGO, AMERICAN SAMOA. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs community5 based outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, 

6 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 

7 and designated as the ‘‘Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a 

8 Hunkin VA Clinic’’. Any reference to such community9 based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, docu10 ment, record, or other paper of the United States shall 

11 be considered to be a reference to the Faleomavaega Eni 

12 Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 7, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1362 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs comFa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. American Samoa, the Faleomavaega Eni munity-based outpatient clinic in Pago Pago,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          371628
<SECURITIES>                                   2571401
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38763
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                209557
<PP&E>                                           63566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   39511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3380615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           411799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         51533
<OTHER-SE>                                     2917283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3380615
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 62575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   809691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (720040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (724360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (724360)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN SCOTT BAIR

, SR.,

Petitioner :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: No. 199 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No. 86-5895.

#### Serrano-Tellez *v.*Young, Warden, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002666
<NAME> ASCENT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          18,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,166
<PP&E>                                         311,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          325,587
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,831
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               318,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
| May 10,  2010 | /s/  James S. Cox        |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
|               | James  S. Cox            |
|               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----