alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bode, Respondent, vs. Jensen, Appellant.

*November 8*

December *4, 1928.*

For the appellant there was a brief- by *James E. Coleman,*attorney, and *William J. McCauley,*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Coleman.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Robert V. Baker,*attorney, and *Robert V. Baker, Jr.,*of counsel, both of Kenosha.

Rosenberry, J.

In his answer the defendant denied that he was the owner of the Hudson automobile, denied that it was being operated by his chauffeur; admitted that he was an occupant of the automobile, but alleged that he was in no manner responsible for the acts of the driver. We find it necessary to consider only the question raised by these allegations in the answer.

*357The defendant established as conclusively as it is possible to establish the fact that the Hudson sedan in which he was riding was bought, paid for, owned, maintained, and operated by the Chicago District Council of Carpenters and was being driven at the time of the accident by a chauffeur employed and paid for by them. At the time of the accident the chauffeur was driving the Hudson sedan to Milwaukee on business of the Chicago District Council of Carpenters, taking the president, the defendant Jensen, and two delegates from a labor union in Germany to visit and inspect the Matthews Brothers woodworking plant in Milwaukee. The only evidence to contradict the documentary evidence offered by the defendant was the statement of certain persons that at or about the time of the accident Jensen said he was the owner of the car. If mere casual statements from which a bystander drew the inference that Jensen was the owner of the car constitute proof of title — a very doubtful proposition to say the least, — it was wholly overcome by proof offered by the defendant. The fact that the name on the list of automobile licenses issued by the secretary of state of Illinois appears as “Carpenters District Council of Chicago —Harry Jensen,” Jensen being the president of the council, was without significance in view of the proof as to. ownership offered by the defendant.

The plaintiff having failed to establish that the defendant was the owner of or responsible for the movements of the automobile at the time in question, judgment must be reversed, with directions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint.

*By the Court,*— It is so ordered,
#### The MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF MOBILE, Plaintiff, v. Robert H. CHING, Jr., as Trustee, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 80-0813-P.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D.

Nov. 2, 1982.

ORDER

PITTMAN, District Judge.

This cause originated in United States Bankruptcy Court in this district. A judgment was entered in that court and it was appealed to the district court. At the same time, the bankruptcy court entered an order removing a stay of proceedings in the Eastern District of Virginia against the Merchants National Bank of Mobile thereby permitting the bank to proceed, with a provision that the Trustee should be permitted to intervene, its claims in that court.

Pending appeal, the case in the Eastern District of Virginia proceeded to judgment. On August 6, 1982, 681 F.2d 1383, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a judgment affirming this court save and except this court’s decision interpreting rework as a general intangible and held that this claim came against the defendant as an “account” under Ala.Code § 7-9-106 (1975) and stated, “Accordingly, we remand to the district court with instructions to enter judgment for Merchants National Bank on the rework claim.” Part of the litigation in the Eastern District of Virginia in this cause involved the rework claim.

This case is remanded to the United States Bankruptcy Court of this district for further proceedings pursuant to the instructions of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER        
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Rosa, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Balaton Power Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    |                                      
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Michael Rosa                     
| | Name:  | Michael Rosa                         
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | July 16, 2007                        

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
[640 NYS2d 788]

#### In the Matter of Richard A. Shepard (Admitted as Richard Alexander Shepard), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

April 8, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert H. Straus,*Brooklyn *(David C. Y. Cheung*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

By order of the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey, dated July 10, 1995, the respondent was suspended from the *154practice of law in New Jersey for a period of one year, effective August 1, 1995, until further order of that court, for gross neglect, abandonment of his client, failure to communicate with his client, misrepresentation regarding the status of a litigation matter, and persistent failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities.

On October 13, 1995, a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 Ob) was mailed to the respondent, informing him of his right to impose certain enumerated defenses to the imposition of discipline in New York. By letter dated October 21, 1995, the respondent’s wife requested an extension of time to respond based upon the assertion that the respondent is currently a resident of Russia and has been for more than a year. Although she planned to obtain the documentation underlying the New Jersey action and to forward that, along with this Court’s notice, to her husband, his extensive travel throughout Russia made communications difficult. To date, there has been no further communication from either the respondent or his wife since the adjourned return date of the petitioner’s notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3.

Under the circumstances of this case, the respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State for one year based upon his suspension in New Jersey.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Balletta, Rosenblatt and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, the respondent, Richard A. Shepard, is suspended from the practice of law in New York for a period of one year, effective May 20, 1996, and continuing until further order of this Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall promptly comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and until the further order of this Court, the respondent, Richard A. Shepard, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) giving *155to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§1350), Michael L. Kranda, President and Chief Executive Officer of Anesiva, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:**

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32.1 (the “***Annual Report***”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 25th day of March 2009.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Anesiva, Inc. and will be retained by Anesiva, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofAnesiva, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# Note to Editors: ACRS Meetings at Two Separate Locations

----

----

No. 99-102 May 18, 1999

**NOTE TO EDITORS: ACRS MEETINGS AT TWO SEPARATE LOCATIONS**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled meetings of three of its subcommittees at two separate locations.

The subcommittee on planning and procedures will meet on June 1 in Rockville, Maryland. The subcommittees on plant operations and on fire protection will meet jointly on June 23 in King of Prussia, Pennslyvania, at the agency's Region I office.

The planning and procedures subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and the status of a new appointment to the committee. The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in room T-2B1 of the agency's Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike.

The subcommittees on plant operations and on fire protection will meet on June 23 to discuss plant performance reviews and challenges posed by the revised NRC reactor oversight program, as well as results of the fire protection functional inspections. The meeting in Region I will be held at 8:30 a.m., at 475 Allendale Road, in the Public Meeting Room.

Other aspects of the meetings, including opportunities for public comment, will be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

Questions regarding scheduling, or presentation of oral statements for the subcommittee meeting on planning and procedures at headquarters should be referred to Dr. John Larkins, at 301-415-7360. Questions regarding the subcommittee meeting on plant operations and on fire protection in Region I should be referred to Amarjit Singh, at 301-415-6899.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
EXHIBIT 31





RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS





I, John R. Ayling, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LD Holdings, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15(d-15(e)for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statement for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and





c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date:  April 15, 2011
/s/  John R. AylingJohn R. Ayling, ChiefExecutive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kensey Nash Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wendy F. DiCicco, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |  |  |                                              
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                          |  | 
|Date:    February 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA                    
|                          |  |  |  | Wendy F. DiCicco, CPA Chief Financial Officer
Canyon Copper Corp. - Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






PROMISSORY NOTE

	EXECUTED BY: 	CANYON COPPER CORP. 
	  	(the "Borrower") 
	 	 
	IN FAVOUR OF: 	ANTHONY R. HARVEY 
	  	(the "Lender") 
	 	 
	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: 	$75,000 (CDN) 
	 	 
	DATE OF EXECUTION: 	January 19, 2011 
	 	 
	PLACE OF EXECUTION: 	Vancouver, British Columbia



FOR VALUE RECEIVED the Borrower hereby promises to pay
to or to the order of the Lender on July 1, 2012, the principal sum of $75,000
(CDN), together with interest thereon at the rate of 15% per annum, calculated
and compounded annually, both before and after maturity from the date
hereof.

The Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and
notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory
Note.

The Borrower agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated,
assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Lender and in every case payment will be
made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Lender upon notice
being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory
Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the
Lender or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Lender and
will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory
Note held by him.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 19th
day of January, 2011 

CANYON COPPER CORP.
by its authorized
signatory:


/s/ Kurt Bordian
KURT BORDIAN
----

----

| 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                                    |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      March 28, 2008 |   |                                                                                    |
|                      | By:    | /s/      Jenifer      Osterwalder          |
|                      |   | Jenifer      Osterwalder                                                                |
|                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                            |

----
No. 82-5906.

#### Shaw *v.*Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
31.2**  **Certification**
 
 
 I,
Patrick A. Quinn, certify that:
 
 1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Teton Petroleum
Company;
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 
 /s/
Patrick A. Quinn
 Patrick
A. Quinn
 Chief
Financial Officer