alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 128

  To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to remove the 
  authority of the United States Postal Service to issue semipostals 
 except as provided for by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to remove the 
  authority of the United States Postal Service to issue semipostals 
 except as provided for by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Semipostal Stamp Clarification Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SEMIPOSTAL STAMP 
              AUTHORITY.

    Section 416 of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Limited Authority.--The Postal Service may issue and sell 
semipostals under this section only for such purposes or causes as 
provided for by an Act of Congress.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``appropriate agency or 
                        agencies'' and inserting ``appropriate agency 
                        or entity, as provided for by an Act of 
                        Congress pursuant to subsection (b),''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``such agency'' and 
                        inserting ``such agency or entity'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (2);
            (3) by striking subsection (e); and
            (4) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (e) and (f), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
#### Merchants National Bank, Respondent, vs. Lynch and another, Appellants.

*May 2*

May *23, 1916.*

*Gharles A. Stichney Go. v. Lynch, ante,*p. 353, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix county: George Thompson, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action to recover on a $318 promissory note alleged to have been made by defendants January 24, 1913, payable to the order of Charles A. Stickney Company, a Minnesota corporation, on or before January 24, 1915, and before maturity, for value, assigned to plaintiff. The complaint was in the usual form. The note was given under the same circumstances as the one sued on in the case of *Gharles A. Stichney Go. v. Lynch, ante,*p. 353, 158 N. W. 85, and is the second note mentioned in the pleadings in such case. The defendants an*359swered, putting in issue the alleged ownership of the note and otherwise substantially, as in the *Stickney Case,*and, in addition, alleging that the Stickney Company, after defendants returned the property represented by said note, and upon their demand, agreed to return the particular note; but later refused to do so, that the note is without consideration and should be delivered up to be canceled; and demanded judgment' dismissing the complaint with costs.

The court found the facts as in the *Stickney' Oase*and, in addition, that plaintiff became owner of the note for value before due, as alleged in the complaint. Judgment was rendered accordingly.

For the appellants there was a brief by *McNally & Boar,*and oral argument by *W. F. McNally*and *W. T. Boar.*

*Spencer Haven,*for the respondent.

Marshall, J.

This case is ruled in respondent’s favor by the result in the case of *Charles A. Stickney Co. v. Lynch, ante,*p. 353, 158 N. W. 85.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1(i)

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.  1994 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN    Amendment No. 9

Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 14 of the Pharmacopeia, Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), the Board of
Directors of Pharmacopeia, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows:







To
record the adoption of this Amendment No. 9, Pharmacopeia has caused its authorized officers to affix its corporation name and seal as of this 2nd day of April,
2002.

|CORPORATE SEAL |  | PHARMACOPEIA, INC.           
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------
|               |  |                              
|               |  |                              
|Attest:        |  | /s/MICHAEL G. LENAHAN        
|               |  |                              
|               |  | Michael G. Lenahan,
Secretary

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

October 10, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:   Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

         1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

Ladies and gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated October 10, 1997 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries for
the three months and nine months ended September 27, 1997 and included within
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement referred to above.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



                                       38
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                      MATZEL & MUMFORD AT FREEHOLD, LLC
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   312,759
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            172,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                           13,057,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      13,542,169
<PP&E>                                                     4,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        13,547,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 13,394,568
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                               152,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          13,547,079
<SALES>                                                7,887,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       7,891,950
<CGS>                                                  7,140,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          7,140,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         658,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           93,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       93,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              93,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
                                                     


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1441 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 

to eliminate the sequestration for the revised security category under 

section 251 and to eliminate the section 251A reduction in discretionary 

appropriations and direct spending accounts within function 050 (defense). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to eliminate the sequestration for the 

revised security category under section 251 and to eliminate the section 251A reduction in discretionary appropriations and direct spending accounts within function 

050 (defense). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal Sequestration 

5 for Defense Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1441 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SEQUESTRATION UNDER THE RE2 VISED SECURITY CATEGORY. 

3 Section 251(c)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emer4 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by striking 

5 each subparagraph (A) for fiscal years 2014 through 2021 

6 and by redesignating each subparagraph (B) as subpara7 graph (A). 

8 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SECTION 251A REDUCTION IN DIS9 CRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS AND DIRECT 

10 SPENDING ACCOUNTS FOR DEFENSE. 

11 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer12 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended as follows: 

13 (1) In paragraph (1)(D), strike ‘‘9’’ and insert 

14 ‘‘18’’. 

15 (2) In paragraph (2), strike everything after 

16 ‘‘section 254(c),’’ and insert the following: ‘‘OMB 

17 shall allocate the total reduction calculated pursuant 

18 to paragraph (1) for that year to discretionary ap19 propriations and direct spending accounts except for 

20 function 050 (defense function).’’. 

21 (3) Strike paragraph (3). 

22 (4) In paragraph (5)(B), strike the dash after 

23 ‘‘limit’’, strike clause (i), and strike ‘‘(ii)’’ and move 

24 that text 2 ems to the left. 

25 (5) In paragraph (6)(A), strike ‘‘paragraphs (3) 

26 and (4)’’ and insert ‘‘paragraph (4)’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1441 IH

1 (6) In paragraph (6)(B), strike the dash after 

2 ‘‘that’’, strike clause (i), and strike ‘‘(ii)’’ and move 

3 that text 2 ems to the left. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irik P. Sevin, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. By:  STAR GAS LLC (General
Partner)January 21, 2003



By:

/S/    IRIK P.
SEVINIrik P. SevinChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE IN SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,059
<SECURITIES>                                    64,423
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,007
<PP&E>                                          10,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,216)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,979
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sean McLaughlin, Appellant, v Richard J. Pisciotti, as Sheriff of the County of Wayne, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 1000]

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see, Kassebaum v al-Rahman,*212 AD2d 482). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Sir kin, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Hank Han-Chao Wang, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 23, 2005
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                  |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                  |   |
|   |   | /s/ Peter Lee                         |   |
|   |   | Peter James Lee                       |   |
|   |   | Secretary and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)         |   |
No: I-19-007 April 9, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

New NRC Senior Resident Inspector Assigned to Hope Creek Nuclear Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, 

Pa., have selected Adam Ziedonis as the new senior resident inspector 

at the Hope Creek Generating Station in Hancock’s Bridge, N.J. He 

joins NRC Resident Inspector Sherlyn Haney at the site operated by 

PSEG Nuclear.

Most recently, Ziedonis was the resident inspector at the Salem 

nuclear power plant, which is adjacent to Hope Creek. He has also 

served as a resident inspector at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power 

Station in Delta, Pa., and as a region-based reactor inspector. 

Ziedonis joined the agency’s Region I office in 2004 after earning his bachelor’s and 

master’s degree in mechanical engineering from Drexel University in Philadelphia. He is a graduate 

of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors who 

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors are assigned to a site 

for up to seven years.
Summary of Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
Adopted October 19, 2009
   
    
    A retainer of $20,000, payable in cash;
    
    Restricted stock under Companys 2006 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the
2006 Plan) having a market value of $35,000 on the date of grant, based on the fair
market value (as defined in the 2006 Plan) of a share of the Companys stock on such
date, subject to a one-year period of restriction; and
    
    Retainers of $10,000 and $7,500, respectively, for the Chairperson of the Audit and
Compensation Committees, payable in cash, and a retainer of $5,000 for the Chairperson
of each of the Corporate Governance and Investment Committees.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01089]



[[Page 3613]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Rare Disease.
    Date: March 16-17, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d4e5c5c4b58594f4f7d535453594e13535455135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="becddfdfc8dbdaccccfed0d7d0dacd90d0d7d690d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01089 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EJSCREEN COMPARISON CHARTS

Table 1 . Demographic Indicators (3 Mile Radius Centered at Facility).

Indicator Veolia Heritage Ross

Minority Population 66% 6% 16%

Low Income Population (< 2x Poverty Line) 56% 46% 22%

Households Earning < $15,000/year (2000) 33% 2 6 % 8%

Population Under 5 years of age 8% 7% 4%

Population over 64 years of age 9% 17% 13%

## Veolia

Heritage

Ross

Figure 1 . EJSCREEN Report: 3

- Mile R adius Centered at Facility.