2824 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

matter shall provide to the affected 

member of the news media notice of the 

order or warrant as soon as it is 

determined that such notice will no 

longer pose a clear and substantial 

threat to the integrity of the 

investigation, risk grave harm to 

national security, or present an 

imminent risk of death or serious bodily 

harm. In any event, such notice shall 

occur within 45 days of the 

government’s receipt of any return made 

pursuant to the subpoena, court order, 

or warrant, except that the Attorney 

General may authorize delay of notice 

for an additional 45 days if he or she 

determines that, for compelling reasons, 

such notice would pose a clear and 

substantial threat to the integrity of the 

investigation, risk grave harm to 

national security, or present an 

imminent risk of death or serious bodily 

harm. No further delays may be sought 

beyond the 90-day period. 

(4) The United States Attorney or 

Assistant Attorney General responsible 

for the matter shall provide to the 

Director of the Office of Public Affairs 

and to the Director of the Criminal 

Division’s Office of Enforcement 

Operations a copy of any notice to be 

provided to a member of the news 

media whose communications records 

or business records were sought or 

obtained at least 10 business days before 

such notice is provided to the affected 

member of the news media, and 

immediately after such notice is, in fact, 

provided to the affected member of the 

news media. 

(f) Questioning, arresting, or charging 

members of the news media. (1) No 

member of the Department shall subject 

a member of the news media to 

questioning as to any offense that he or 

she is suspected of having committed in 

the course of, or arising out of, 

newsgathering activities without first 

providing notice to the Director of the 

Office of Public Affairs and obtaining 

the express authorization of the 

Attorney General. The government need 

not view the member of the news media 

as a subject or target of an investigation, 

or have the intent to prosecute the 

member of the news media, to trigger 

the requirement that the Attorney 

General must authorize such 

questioning. 

(2) No member of the Department 

shall seek a warrant for an arrest, or 

conduct an arrest, of a member of the 

news media for any offense that he or 

she is suspected of having committed in 

the course of, or arising out of, 

newsgathering activities without first 

providing notice to the Director of the 

Office of Public Affairs and obtaining 

the express authorization of the 

Attorney General. 

(3) No member of the Department 

shall present information to a grand jury 

seeking a bill of indictment, or file an 

information, against a member of the 

news media for any offense that he or 

she is suspected of having committed in 

the course of, or arising out of 

newsgathering activities, without first 

providing notice to the Director of the 

Office of Public Affairs and obtaining 

the express authorization of the 

Attorney General. 

(4) In requesting the Attorney 

General’s authorization to question, to 

seek an arrest warrant for or to arrest, or 

to present information to a grand jury 

seeking an indictment or to file an 

information against, a member of the 

news media as provided in paragraphs 

(f)(1) through (3) of this section, 

members of the Department shall 

provide all facts necessary for a 

determination by the Attorney General. 

(5) In determining whether to grant a 

request for authorization to question, to 

seek an arrest warrant for or to arrest, or 

to present information to a grand jury 

seeking an indictment or to file an 

information against, a member of the 

news media, the Attorney General 

should take into account the 

considerations reflected in the 

Statement of Principles in paragraph (a) 

of this section. 

(g) Exigent circumstances. (1)(i) A 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General for 

the Criminal Division may authorize the 

use of a subpoena or court order, as 

described in paragraph (c) of this 

section, or the questioning, arrest, or 

charging of a member of the news 

media, as described in paragraph (f) of 

this section, if he or she determines that 

the exigent use of such law enforcement 

tool or technique is necessary to prevent 

or mitigate an act of terrorism; other acts 

that are reasonably likely to cause 

significant and articulable harm to 

national security; death; kidnapping; 

substantial bodily harm; conduct that 

constitutes a specified offense against a 

minor (for example, as those terms are 

defined in section 111 of the Adam 

Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act 

of 2006, 42 U.S.C. 16911), or an attempt 

or conspiracy to commit such a criminal 

offense; or incapacitation or destruction 

of critical infrastructure (for example, as 

defined in section 1016(e) of the USA 

PATRIOT Act, 42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)). 

(ii) A Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General for the Criminal Division may 

authorize an application for a warrant, 

as described in paragraph (d) of this 

section, if there is reason to believe that 

the immediate seizure of the materials at 

issue is necessary to prevent the death 

of, or serious bodily injury to, a human 

being, as provided in 42 U.S.C. 

2000aa(a)(2) and (b)(2). 

(2) Within 10 business days of the 

approval by a Deputy Assistant Attorney 

General for the Criminal Division of a 

request under paragraph (g) of this 

section, the United States Attorney or 

Assistant Attorney General responsible 

for the matter shall provide to the 

Attorney General and to the Director of 

the Office of Public Affairs a statement 

containing the information that would 

have been provided in a request for 

prior authorization. 

(h) Safeguarding. Any information or 

records obtained from members of the 

news media or from third parties 

pursuant to this policy shall be closely 

held so as to prevent disclosure of the 

information to unauthorized persons or 

for improper purposes. Members of the 

Department should consult the United 

States Attorneys’ Manual for specific 

guidance regarding the safeguarding of 

information or records obtained from 

members of the news media or from 

third parties pursuant to this policy. 

(i) Failure to comply with policy. 

Failure to obtain the prior approval of 

the Attorney General, as required by this 

policy, may constitute grounds for an 

administrative reprimand or other 

appropriate disciplinary action. 

(j) General provision. This policy is 

not intended to, and does not, create 

any right or benefit, substantive or 

procedural, enforceable at law or in 

equity by any party against the United 

States, its departments, agencies, or 

entities, its officers, employees, or 

agents, or any other person. 

Dated: January 14, 2015. 

Eric H. Holder, Jr., 

Attorney General. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00919 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2013–0654] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; SFOBB Demolition Safety 

Zone, San Francisco, CA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone in 

the navigable waters of the San 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 2825 

Francisco Bay near Yerba Buena Island, 

CA in support of the San FranciscoOakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) 

Demolition Safety Zone from December 

31, 2014 through December 30, 2015. 

An earlier temporary safety zone was 

established in this same area from 

September 1, 2013 through December 

30, 2014 to protect mariners transiting 

the area from the dangers associated 

with over-head demolition and debris 

removal operations of the SFOBB. 

Extended demolition efforts necessitate 

a new temporary safety zone in the area. 

Unauthorized persons or vessels are 

prohibited from entering into, transiting 

through, or remaining in the safety zone 

without permission of the Captain of the 

Port or their designated representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective without 

actual notice from January 21, 2015 

until December 30, 2015. For the 

purposes of enforcement, actual notice 

will be used from December 31, 2014 

until January 21, 2015. This rule will be 

enforced from 6 a.m. until 7 p.m. daily 

on the dates mentioned above. 

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in 

this preamble are part of docket USCG– 

2013–0654. To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, type the docket 

number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua 

Dykman, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San 

Francisco; telephone (415) 399–3585 or 

email at D11-PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

(202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

CALTRANS California Department of 

Transportation 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

SFOBB San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge 

A. Regulatory History and Information 

On September 3, 2013, the Coast 

Guard published a temporary final rule 

entitled, ‘‘Safety Zone; SFOBB 

Demolition Safety Zone, San Francisco, 

CA’’ (78 FR 54171) establishing a safety 

zone in the navigable waters of the San 

Francisco Bay near Yerba Buena Island, 

CA. The purpose of the safety zone was 

to provide for the safety of mariners 

from dangers posed by over-head 

demolition and debris removal 

operations of the San Francisco-Oakland 

Bay Bridge (SFOBB) demolition project. 

On November 6, 2014, the California 

Department of Transportation 

(CALTRANS) submitted a request to 

extend the safety zone for an additional 

year due to an extension of the 

demolition project. 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary final rule without prior 

notice and opportunity to comment 

pursuant to authority under section 4(a) 

of the Administrative Procedure Act 

(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

not publishing a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this 

rule because publishing an NPRM 

would be impractical and contrary to 

the public interest. CALTRANS 

submitted its request to extend the 

safety zone on November 6, 2014, and 

the demolition project extension began 

before the rulemaking process would be 

completed. Because of the dangers 

posed by over-head demolition and 

debris removal operations of the 

SFOBB, the safety zone is necessary to 

provide for the safety of mariners 

transiting the area. For the safety 

concerns noted, it is in the public 

interest to have this safety zone in effect 

during the event. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same 

reasons stated above, the Coast Guard 

finds that good cause exists for making 

this rule effective less than 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register. 

B. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the proposed rule 

is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 

701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 

CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; 

Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; 

Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1, which 

collectively authorize the Coast Guard 

to establish safety zones. 

CALTRANS will sponsor the SFOBB 

Demolition Safety Zone from December 

31, 2014 through December 30, 2015, in 

the navigable waters of the San 

Francisco Bay near Yerba Buena Island, 

CA. Demolition and debris removal 

operations are scheduled to take place 

from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily beginning on 

December 31, 2014 and ending on 

December 30, 2015. The safety zone will 

encompass the navigable waters of the 

San Francisco Bay within 100 yards of 

the SFOBB from Yerba Buena Island to 

the ‘‘I’’ Pier, also known as ‘‘E4’’ Pier. 

The demolition project is necessary to 

facilitate the completion of the Bay 

Bridge project. The safety zone is issued 

to establish a temporary limited access 

area on the waters surrounding the 

demolition operation. The safety zone is 

necessary to protect mariners transiting 

the area from the dangers associated 

with over-head debris removal. 

C. Discussion of the Final Rule 

The Coast Guard will enforce a safety 

zone in navigable waters around and 

under the SFOBB within 100 yards of 

the bridge beginning at Yerba Buena 

Island and ending at the ‘‘I’’ Pier for the 

demolition and debris removal of the 

Yerba Buena Island Detour and the 

Cantilever Truss segment of the SFOBB. 

Demolition and debris removal is 

scheduled to take place from 6 a.m. to 

7 p.m. daily beginning on December 31, 

2014 and ending on December 30, 2015. 

At the conclusion of the demolition 

operations the safety zone shall 

terminate. 

The effect of the temporary safety 

zone will be to restrict navigation in the 

vicinity of the demolition and debris 

removal operations. Except for persons 

or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard 

Patrol Commander, no person or vessel 

may enter or remain in the restricted 

area. This safety zone is needed to 

protect public safety by keeping 

mariners and vessels away from the 

immediate vicinity of the construction 

operation. The maritime public will be 

advised in advance of this safety zone 

via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

D. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes and executive 

orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
2826 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

12866 or under section 1 of Executive 

Order 13563. The Office of Management 

and Budget has not reviewed it under 

those Orders. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this rule will not rise to the level of 

necessitating a full Regulatory 

Evaluation. The safety zone is limited in 

duration, and is limited to a narrowly 

tailored geographic area. In addition, 

although this rule restricts access to the 

waters encompassed by the safety zone, 

the effect of this rule will not be 

significant because the local waterway 

users will be notified via public 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure 

the safety zone will result in minimum 

impact. The entities most likely to be 

affected are waterfront facilities, 

commercial vessels, and pleasure craft 

engaged in recreational activities. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule may affect the following 

entities, some of which may be small 

entities: Owners and operators of 

waterfront facilities, commercial 

vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in 

recreational activities and sightseeing, if 

these facilities or vessels are in the 

vicinity of the safety zone at times when 

this zone is being enforced. This rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities for the following reasons: (i) 

This rule will encompass only a small 

portion of the waterway for a limited 

period of time, (ii) vessel traffic can 

transit safely around the safety zone, 

and (iii) the maritime public will be 

advised in advance of this safety zone 

via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a safety 

zone of limited size and duration. This 

rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 2827 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add temporary § 165.T11–589 to 

read as follows: 

§ 165.T11–589 Safety zone; SFOBB 

Demolition Safety Zone, San Francisco, CA. 

(a) Location. This temporary safety 

zone is established in the navigable 

waters of the San Francisco Bay near 

Yerba Buena Island, California as 

depicted in National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 

Chart 18650. The safety zone will 

encompass the navigable waters around 

the SFOBB within 100 yards beginning 

at Yerba Buena Island and ending at the 

‘‘I’’ Pier. 

(b) Enforcement period. The zone 

described in paragraph (a) of this 

section will be in effect from 6 a.m. to 

7 p.m. daily from December 31, 2014 

until December 30, 2015. The Captain of 

the Port San Francisco (COTP) will 

notify the maritime community of 

periods during which this zone will be 

enforced via Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 

165.7. 

(c) Definitions. As used in this 

section, ‘‘designated representative’’ 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal, 

State, or local officer designated by or 

assisting the COTP in the enforcement 

of the safety zone. 

(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart 

C, entry into, transiting or anchoring 

within this safety zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the COTP or a 

designated representative. 

(2) The safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the COTP or a designated 

representative. 

(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone must 

contact the COTP or a designated 

representative to obtain permission to 

do so. Vessel operators given permission 

to enter or operate in the safety zone 

must comply with all directions given to 

them by the COTP or a designated 

representative. Persons and vessels may 

request permission to enter the safety 

zone on VHF–23A or through the 24- 

hour Command Center at telephone 

(415) 399–3547. 

Dated: December 16, 2014. 

Gregory G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00915 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0814; FRL–9921–54- 

Region 8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; State of 

Colorado; Second Ten-Year PM10

Maintenance Plan for Steamboat 

Springs 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action 

approving State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) revisions submitted by the State of 

Colorado. On May 11, 2012, the 

designee of the Governor of Colorado 

submitted to EPA a revised maintenance 

plan for the Steamboat Springs area for 

the National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) for particulate 

matter with an aerodynamic diameter 

less than or equal to 10 microns (PM10). 

The SIP was adopted by the State on 

December 15, 2011. As required by 

Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A, this 

revised maintenance plan addresses 

maintenance of the PM10 standard for a 

second 10-year period beyond the area’s 

original redesignation to attainment for 

the PM10 NAAQS. In addition, EPA is 

approving the revised maintenance 

plan’s 2024 transportation conformity 

motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB) 

for PM10. This action is being taken 

under sections 110 and 175A of the 

CAA. 

DATES: This rule is effective on March 

23, 2015 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by 

February 20, 2015. If adverse comment 

is received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– 

OAR–2013–0814, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert 

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing 

comments). 

• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air 

Program, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– 

AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129. 

• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director, 

Air Program, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 

Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Such 

deliveries are only accepted Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

excluding federal holidays. Special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2013– 

0814. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA, without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES