alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Marvin O. Schlanger, Chief Executive Officer, certify that
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Resolution PerformanceProducts LLC and RPP Capital Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrants’ as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants’ and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrants, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylike to adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 16, 2004   By    /s/ Marvin O. Schlanger  Marvin O. Schlanger, Chief Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNRC Maps

# NRC Maps of Power Reactors

On this page:
        - Decommissioning Power Reactors
        - New Power Reactors
        - Operating Power Reactors

## Decommissioning Power Reactors

## New Power Reactors

## Operating Power Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 28, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Agreement States
          - Decommissioning Sites
          - Emergency Preparedness Maps
          - Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)
          - NRC Regions
          - Nuclear Materials Facilities
          - Power Reactors
          - Radioactive Waste Sites
          - Research and Test Reactors
          - Uranium Recovery Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, February 28, 2023
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A.A., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Lorena Arreola,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 55758

D.C. No.

3:15

- cv

- 01244

- H

- WVG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 11, 2018

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and SIMON, ** District Judge.

A.A. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the

United States. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See United States v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Nin th Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

SEP 27 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Kwai Fun Wong , 135 S. Ct. 1625, 1629 (2015). Reviewing de novo, see Booth v.

United States , 914 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir. 2019) , we affirm.

“ [A] n attorney’s filing by mail shortly before a deadline expires constitutes

routine negligence.” Okafor v. United States , 846 F.3d 337, 340 (9th Cir. 2017)

.

Even if the deadline would not have been missed but for the courier’s delivery

delay, we “do not re cognize run

- of

- the mill mistakes as grounds for equitable

tolling” because they do not amount to an “extraordinary circumstance.” Id.

(quoting Luna v. Kernan , 784 F.3d 640, 646 (9th Cir. 2015) ). That the U.S. Postal

Service and the U.S. Department of Hea lth and Human Services are both branches

of the federal government makes no difference. The Postal Service is “an

independent establishment of the executive branch,” Currier v. Potter , 379 F.3d

716, 725 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting 39 U.S.C. § 201 ), that is “run more like a

business,” id. (quoting Franchise Tax Bd. v. U

. S

. Postal Serv. , 467 U.S. 512, 519

–

20 (1984) )

.

AFFIRMED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 2022

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 3, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 3, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| Dated: August 8, 2005  | /s/  DEBORAH DUNSIRE        |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |                                       |   |
|                        | Deborah Dunsire                       |   |
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                        | (Principal executive officer)         |   |
|                        |                                  |   |

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 82-5583.

#### Cunningham *v.*Novak.

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.
#### In re VERCO INDUSTRIES, a California corporation, Debtor. SPARTAN PLASTICS, a Partnership, Claimant-Appellant, v. VERCO INDUSTRIES, a California corporation, Debtor-in-Possession, Debtor-Appellee.

BAP No. CC-81-1212-VGH.

Bankruptcy No. SA-80-01923-PE.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panels of the Ninth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 21, 1982.

Decided March 8, 1982.

George F. Hemingway, Jeffrey H. Herman, Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Alison & Tucker, Los Angeles, Cal., for claimant-appellant.

Alan D. Pedlar, Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for debtor-appel-lee.

Before VOLINN, GEORGE and HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judges.

OPINION

VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:

The facts are not disputed. Verco Industries, the debtor-in-possession, leased a building owned by Spartan Plastics. Verco owes Spartan rent for the period between July 23 and September 15, 1980. The trial court found this to be an administrative expense allowable under 11 U.S.C. § 503 in the amount of $10,791.1

Noting that “Spartan Plastics owes the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate of Verco Industries the sum of $37,110 plus interest and attorneys’ fees as a result of the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit” the trial court granted Verco a stay of payment of the administrative expense. This stay is to continue in effect until such time as the outstanding debt of Spartan Plastics is paid in full, or until Spartan Plastics obtains a reversal on appeal of the above-mentioned decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Spartan asserts that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 503 and 507, it is entitled to *665*immediate*payment of its administrative claim. The determination of when an administrative expense is to be paid is within the discretion of the trial court. *In re Standard Furniture Co.,*3 B.R. 527, 6 B.C.D. 270, 2 C.B.C.2d 274 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Cal.1980); See also 3 *Collier on Bankruptcy,*¶ 503.01, at p. 503-3 (15th ed. 1981).

Presently, Yerco Industries holds a valid and enforceable judgment against Spartan Plastics in the amount of $37,110 while Vereo owes Spartan Plastics $10,791 as an administrative expense. The stay preserves the status quo pending Spartan Plastics’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Spartan Plastics has failed to show an abuse of discretion. The order staying payment of the administrative expense is affirmed.

Yerco asserts that the present appeal is frivolous and requestions attorneys’ fees and costs. We decline to award fees and costs in this case.

The decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED and the appellee’s request for attorneys’ fees is hereby DENIED.

1

. In compliance with a prior court order, Verco paid Spartan $202 per day for rent from September 15, 1980 until it vacated the premises.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Drones of the Water

By Petty Officer 3rd Class Kylie Jagiello U.S. 3rd Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 90-788.

#### Halas *v.*Department of Energy.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3/12 Participates in Central Training Area High Mobility Artillery Rocket System Field Training Exercise 

By Cpl. Josue Marquez3rd Marine Division

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
breslownote110310.htm






  





  











  













 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$300,000                                                                           Date:  November 3, 2010


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($300,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.












/s/ Melvin Gagerman


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated:  November 3, 2010
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T.J.T., Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Terrence J. Sheldon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Terrence J. Sheldon  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Terrence J. Sheldon     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| February 13, 2004  |

 

----
#### In re James NICHOLS, Debtor. James NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; University of California at Davis, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 181-00014.

Adv. No. 181-0066.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine.

Nov. 10, 1981.

*209Jane Orbeton, Smith, Stein & Bernota-vicz, Hallowell, Me., for debtor.

Donald L. Reidhaar, Martha M. Chase, Berkeley, Cal., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FREDERICK A. JOHNSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff seeks a determination that his debt to the Regents of the University of California for three outstanding student loans in the aggregate amount of $5,467.32 imposes an undue hardship on him and should be discharged. Ordinarily educational loans are not discharged in bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(8), unless the debtor, through proof of extraordinary circumstances, demonstrates that this status unreasonably hinders his fresh start, *In re Densmore,*8 B.R. 308, 7 BCD 271, 272 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1980); 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(8)(B). Mere inconvenience, an austere budget, financial adversity and a poor, present employment situation are not grounds for including such debts among those discharged in bankruptcy. *See In re Johnson,*5 BCD 532, 536 (E.D.Penn.B.J. 1979); *In re Kohn,*5 BCD 419, 424 (S.D.N. Y.B.J.1979); H.Rep. No. 137 part 2, 93rd Cong., 1st Sess., 1973, 140-41.

Initial examination of the Debtor revealed a well educated and articulate individual whose prospects should be encouraging. However, the Debtor has been unable to obtain or retain suitable employment because of a history of psychiatric disorders and related problems with alcohol.

In an effort to help himself he is presently enrolled in a two year program with the Kennebec Valley Comprehensive Alcoholism Treatment Program at Waterville, Maine. The Debtor has completed the inpatient portion of the program and has abstained from the use of alcohol for nine months. He is active in alcoholics anonymous.

In spite of his efforts the Debtor will be unable to function at more than a subsis-tance level for a substantial period and perhaps for the rest of his life. He is unable to cope with a stressful job or situation.

In view of the unique facts of this case the Court must find that excepting his educational loan from discharge will impose an *210undue hardship on the Debtor within the intent of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B).

An appropriate order will be entered.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                         SECTION 13 OF THE HILLS, L.L.C.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                125,301
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         5,579,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    5,805,065
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      5,805,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,974,384
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                           (169,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        5,805,065
<SALES>                                             3,043,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,046,639
<CGS>                                               2,946,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       2,946,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      100,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            69
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        69
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                               69
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0

        


</TABLE>
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1488 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To retitle Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore as Indiana 

Dunes National Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1488 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indiana Dunes Na3 tional Park Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE RETITLED 

5 AS INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL PARK. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 

7 460u et seq.) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘National Lakeshore’’ and ‘‘na9 tional lakeshore’’ each place it appears and inserting 

10 ‘‘National Park’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘lakeshore’’ each place it ap12 pears and inserting ‘‘Park’’. 

13 (b) NONAPPLICATION.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to the title of the map 

15 referred to in the first section of Public Law 89–761 (16 

16 U.S.C. 460u), or to the title of the maps referred to in 

17 section 4 of Public Law 89–761 (16 U.S.C. 460u–3). 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1488 RFS 

1 SEC. 3. PAUL H. DOUGLAS TRAIL. 

2 The 1.6 mile trail within the Indiana Dunes National 

3 Park designated the ‘‘Miller-Woods Trail’’ is hereby redes4 ignated as the ‘‘Paul H. Douglas Trail’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 1, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS