alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20732 and #20733; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20014]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated October 5, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Helene.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 1, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         September 23, 2024 through October 7, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         December 4, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         July 7, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Florida, dated October 5, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Collier, Lee, Marion, Sumter.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-27569 Filed 11-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 82-839.

#### Americana Healthcare Corp. et al. *v.*Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 3 37 A 1 7 Filed 6 April 2018

THOMAS JACKSON and KORLETTER HORNE JACKSON

v. CENTURY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the unpublished decision of a
divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 80 3 S.E.2d 868 (20 1 7 ),
affirming a n order of summary judgment entered on 3 Ju ne 201 6 by Judge Susan E.
Bray in Superior Court, Forsyth County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 March

2018

.

Botros Law, PLLC, by Tony S. Botros , for plaintiff

- appellants

. Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP, by Susan K. Burkhart, for defendant

appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Frank Cable Visits Visakhapatnam, India

By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Jonathan TrejoUSS Frank Cable (AS 40) Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Butler, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 736]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), rendered November 16, 1993, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*732The defendant contends that the prosecution’s witnesses, because of their delay in identifying him, should not have been believed by the jury. However, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1428 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to authorize COPS grantees to use grant 

funds to hire veterans as career law enforcement officers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1428 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Law En3 forcement Heroes Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VET5 ERANS. 

6 Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

7 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

8 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including by 

9 prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as defined 

10 in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)’’ after ‘‘Na11 tion’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
No. 82-5833.

#### Bell *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Accepting Comment on Maine Yankee Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report

----

----

I-97-127

September 23, 1997

**NRC ACCEPTING COMMENT ON MAINE YANKEE POST-SHUTDOWN DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES REPORT**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available for public comment the post-shutdown decommissioning activities report for the Maine Yankee nuclear plant in Wiscasset, Maine, filed with NRC on August 27.

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, which operated the plant, has selected the DECON alternative for decommissioning the site. DECON is the alternative in which the equipment, structures and portions of the facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after operations cease.

The licensee intends to complete the decontamination and dismantlement of the majority of plant structures within approximately seven years of cessation of operations. The licensee intends to construct an independent facility to store the spent fuel on site until the fuel can be permanently transferred offsite to a Department of Energy facility.

 The report is available for public inspection at the local public document room at the Wiscasset Public Library, on High Street in Wiscasset. A copy is also available on the NRC's web site.

Comments should be submitted in writing to Singh Bajwa (ssb1@nrc.gov), Mail Stop 11-B 20, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, by October 12.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
No. 90-6136.

#### Greene *v.*Dutch Point Credit Union.

App. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

July 10, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries

     1). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290) 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to Certain Directors and
Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan

Ladies and gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated July 10, 1997 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries for
the three months and six months ended June 28, 1997 and included within
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement referred to above.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not
be considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                       20
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Excelligence Learning Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Ronald Elliott     
|                      |  | Ronald Elliott         
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
### MCELROY,DEUTSCH,MULVANEY 

## & CARPENTER, LLP

ALBERT J. PUCCIARELLI Direct dial: (201) 493-3718 apucciarelli@mdmc-law.com
U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 ATrORNEYSAT LAW 40West Ridgewood Avenue Ridgewood, NJ 07450 (201) 445-6722 FACSIMILE (201) 445-5376
April 23, 2015 . ,, ' 

## - ·_; ,.. __ -3 -. '-"

Re: Amendmentto ExemptionNo. 11311 issued pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1055 Dear Sirs/Madams: Next Generation was issued Exemption number 11311 (hereinafterthe "Exemption") using the DJI S1 000+ Premium Unmanned Aircraft System. At this time, Next Generation respectfully requests that the Exemption be amended to permit its use ofan additional unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") platform, specifically, the DJI Inspire 1model T600quadcopter. The DJI Inspire 1model T600 falls within all the operating limitations in our approved Exemption and therefore Next Generation will also be using the same Operations and Safety Manual submitted as confidential documents underthe original approved Exemption. Attached hereto and submitted as aconfidential document is the Inspire 1 User Manual that will be used in conjunction with Next Generation's Operations and Safety Manual to maintain full compliance with the terms ofthe Exemption. As this is an amendmentto an existing-exemption, it is Next Generation's position that good cause for the amendment exists and that notice ofthe requested amendment does not have to be published in theFederal Register. All operations ofthe additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms ofthe Exemption.

AJP:gdm Cc: Frank R. Galella, III

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT MASSACHUSETIS COLORADO DELAWARE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2017

jam

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2017

155566 (13)

In re BROOKS

_________________________________________

TERRY BROOKS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 155566

COA: 336912

INGHAM CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
### The Honorab le H. Franklin Waters, Chief Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-2333

___________ Janice Tackett, Individually and * as Administratrix of the Estate * of Laurie Taffner, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Arkansas. * Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 1997 Filed: January 17, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jan ice Tackett appeals from the District Court's order grantin g 1 summaryjudgment to Farmers Insurance Company in her breach of contrac t action. Having caref ully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the dis trict court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 110/09/2008 15:27:05

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Susquehanna 1 Docket (050- 00387)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

17

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

429

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 183 - Pre-job activities LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

536

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Oversight / LER130 - Inadequate suprevision / command and control O - Operations T - Testing 

17

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER183 - Pre-job activities LTA O - Operations T - Testing 196 - Independent verification / plant tours LTA O - Operations T - Testing 197 - Self-check LTA O - Operations T - Testing 

321

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 14
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

JEROME RAHEEM SIMPSON

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 24

- 1265

August 14 , 202 4

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Pinellas County; Julie Lyn Sercus , Judge.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6001** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. TORRANCE JONES, a/k/a Tube , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:96

- cr - 00079

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge , and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit J udges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Torrance Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Torrance Jones appeals the district court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jones , No. 5:96

- cr - 00079

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME D
No. 82-5842.

#### Walker *v.*Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              74
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                        71
<INVENTORY>                                      3,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,514
<PP&E>                                           3,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,799
<SALES>                                         16,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,947
<CGS>                                           14,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    33
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (58)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (72)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (72)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>