alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cancer Capital Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 27, 2007 /s/ John W. Peters John W. Peters Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         32,848 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,003 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41,309       
<PP&E>                                        842,981      
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                893,243      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52,050    
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          954 
<OTHER-SE>                                    827,556       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  828,510         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               87,564          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  94,008          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,436       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,415      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (979)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (979) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01) 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Mykrolis Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, C. William Zadel, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bertrand Loy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ C. William
Zadel

C. William Zadel

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2004





/s/
Bertrand Loy

Bertrand Loy

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe  date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnJ. Hanlon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ John J.  Hanlon          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| John J.  Hanlon              |
| Executive  Vice President    |
| and Chief  Financial Officer |
|                         |
| May 10, 2004                 |

 

----
Exhibit 10.18

LOGO

February 2, 2006

Star Gas Partners, L.P.

2187 Atlantic Street

Stamford, Connecticut 06902

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We
have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, and have read the Partnerships statements contained in Note 3 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 3, the Partnership changed its method of accounting for accounting for inventory to the weighted average cost method from the first-in, first-out method and states
that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it reflects a more accurate correlation between revenues and product costs experienced in the Partnerships business environment by normalizing the carrying
cost of heating oil and other fuels given the increasing short-term volatility in the marketplace for these products. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Partnership officials the circumstances and business judgment
and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial
statements of the Partnership as of any date or for any period subsequent to September 30, 2005, nor have we audited the information set forth in the aforementioned Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do
not express an opinion concerning the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change,
authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Partnerships compliance with the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements
business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Partnerships circumstances.

Very truly yours,

LOGO
#### First National Bank of Fort Atkinson, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Tax Commission, Respondent.

*October 13*

November *11, 1930.*

*426For the appellant there was a brief by *Clarence R. Hicks*of Madison, attorney, and *M. W. Sweet*of Madison and *Weed & Hollister*of Oshkosh of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Sweet*and *Mr. Hicks.*

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *A. L. Hougen*of Manitowoc, special counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Hougen.*

Fairchild, J.

One having under protest turned his money over in payment of an invalid tax and followed his protest with suits to recover the amount, has preserved his title to the fund. If the law under which the assessment is made, or the assessment itself, is in fact invalid, the money remains his property. In regaining possession of it he does not obtain gain or income. When the property is restored to him at the end of litigation or under a compromise, he *427gets back what he originally had. The law contemplates the return of taxes illegally exacted, and a compromise under the circumstances existing in this case must be recognized and dealt with as fixing the rights of the respective parties.

The respondent contends that the appellant has not paid any income tax for the years 1923, 1924, or 1925, and that according to the provisions of the law if the bank contended this tax was invalid it should have made return of its net income and tendered payment under the income-tax plan. In the settlement made between the bank and the city the bank yielded to the city $7,907.88. Just what this may cover in the matter of claims by the city for taxes which might have accrued under the income-tax method is not to be determined here. But in this case we are controlled by the assumption which must persist until explained away, that the claims of both parties to the controversy were considered and adjusted in the settlement agreement.

In 1926 the bank did report in its return of income as a disbursement the local taxes paid in that year on bank stock, and claimed as a deduction the $3,264.47 so paid. One half of this amount was returned to the bank in 1927 and should have been reported there as a taxable receipt. A reasonable construction of the settlement above referred to, under the circumstances, would require the reporting of this $1,632.23 refund, as this would be proper procedure under the receipts and disbursements basis of accounting, the bank having claimed as a deduction the tax first paid and its claim having been allowed.

It follows that the only amount of this refund to be considered as properly a part of the income report is the sum of $1,632.23.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC Proposes $8,000 Fine Against Pennsylvania Steel Company for Discrimination Against Worker Who Gave Agency Information

----

----

I-97-28

March 21, 1997

**NRC PROPOSES $8,000 FINE AGAINST PENNSYLVANIA STEEL COMPANY FOR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WORKER WHO GAVE AGENCY INFORMATION**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $8,000 civil penalty against a Pennsylvania company for discriminating against an employee who provided information to the federal agency last year. The fine was based on the findings of an investigation conducted by the NRC's Office of Investigations.

Specifically, the NRC has determined that Koppel Steel Corporation, in Beaver Falls, Pa., fired its radiation safety officer after the worker gave an NRC official information during an inspection of the facility on April 23, 1996.

In part because of the information supplied, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to Koppel Steel a month later, for five breaches of agency requirements identified during the inspection. The violations dealt with radiation safety program deficiencies.

Koppel Steel has maintained it dismissed the worker on June 14 because he misrepresented to the NRC during the inspection that he was not the radiation safety officer. However, the NRC has concluded, based on its investigation, this did not take place and that this explanation was merely a pretext for the real reason behind the termination, namely the employee's communications with the agency.

"The NRC considers this violation very significant since all employees must feel free to raise safety concerns, either to the NRC, or to their management and supervision, without fear of retaliation," NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller wrote to the company. "At Koppel Steel, that did not occur, and this violation creates the potential for a chilling effect on other Koppel employees feeling free to raise safety concerns."

NRC regulations prohibit discrimination by an agency license-holder against an employee for engaging in certain "protected activities." These activities include providing the NRC with information pertaining to possible violations of agency requirements.

Koppel Steel is required to submit a written statement or explanation for the alleged violation to the NRC within 30 days. The response must include corrective steps that have and/or will be taken to avoid further violations and the date when full compliance will be achieved. Within the same time frame, the company must either pay the proposed fine or request in writing that all or part of it be withdrawn.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 95101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27387]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 922

[Docket No. 240829-0230]
RIN 0648-BL31

Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary

AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Ocean Service, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notification of effective date of final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is 
providing notice that the final rule published on October 16, 2024, to 
designate Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary (CHNMS), is 
effective on November 30, 2024.

DATES: The final rule to designate CHNMS, which was published in the 
Federal Register (89 FR 83554) on October 16, 2024, is effective 
November 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Ingulsrud, West Coast Regional 
Policy Analyst, 99 Pacific Street, Suite 100F, Monterey, CA 93940, 831-
647-6450, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 304(b) of the National 
Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1434(b)), NOAA published in 
the Federal Register notification of the designation of CHNMS and final 
regulations to implement the designation on October 16, 2024 (89 FR 
83554). As required by the NMSA, the designation and regulations would 
become effective following the close of a review period of 45 days of 
continuous session of Congress beginning on the date of publication (16 
U.S.C. 1434(b)(1)). The regulations are effective as of November 30, 
2024.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922

    Administrative practice and procedure, Coastal zone, Cultural 
resources, Historic preservation, Marine protected areas, Marine 
resources, National marine sanctuaries, Recreation and recreation 
areas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Shipwrecks.

John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Ocean 
Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-27387 Filed 11-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                            ZORAN CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                               (UNAUDITED)


                                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            MARCH 31,
                                                      --------------------
                                                        1997        1996
                                                      --------    --------
Weighted average common shares outstanding              9,103       8,702
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants 
  based on the treasury stock method                    1,967       1,473
                                                      -------     -------

Weighted average common shares and equivalents         11,070      10,175
                                                      -------     -------
                                                      -------     -------

Net income                                            $   677     $   661
                                                      -------     -------
                                                      -------     -------

Net income per share                                  $  0.06     $  0.06
                                                      -------     -------
                                                      -------     -------
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1618 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that caregivers for veterans 

with serious illnesses are eligible for assistance and support services 

provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2017 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that caregivers for veterans with serious illnesses are eligible for 

assistance and support services provided by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support our Services 

5 to Veterans Caregivers Act’’ or the ‘‘S.O.S. Veterans 

6 Caregivers Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1618 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARE2 GIVERS OF VETERANS. 

3 (a) CAREGIVERS OF VETERANS WITH SERIOUS ILL4 NESSES.—Paragraph (2)(B) of section 1720G(a) of title 

5 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘illness 

6 or’’ after ‘‘serious’’. 

7 (b) ASSESSING CAREGIVER AND VETERAN BURDEN

8 AND SATISFACTION.— 

9 (1) SURVEY.—Paragraph (3)(A)(ii) of such sec10 tion is amended— 

11 (A) in subclause (IV), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

12 and inserting a semicolon; 

13 (B) in subclause (V), by striking the period 

14 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

16 subclause: 

17 ‘‘(VI) not less than annually, a multi18 dimensional assessment to measure, in both ob19 jective and subjective terms, the burden and 

20 strain felt by the family caregiver.’’. 

21 (2) REPORTS.—Section 101(c)(2)(B) of the 

22 Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services 

23 Act of 2010 (38 U.S.C. 1720G note) is amended— 

24 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

25 inserting a semicolon; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1618 IH

1 (B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

4 clause: 

5 ‘‘(iii) a description of the satisfaction 

6 experienced by caregivers and veterans 

7 with respect to such program, including 

8 any findings regarding whether such pro9 gram reduces the burden and strain felt by 

10 caregivers.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to services provided 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS