alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Clark N. CONNER and Doretha S. Conner, Debtors. Clark N. CONNER and Doretha S. Conner, Plaintiffs, v. MOUNT CARMEL COUNTRY ESTATES, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 82-00437A.

Adv. No. 82-0325A.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

July 13, 1982.

*617Paul C. Parker, Decatur, Ga., for plaintiffs.

Ron Parnell, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.

ORDER

W. HOMER DRAKE, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment arising out of plaintiffs’ Complaint to Avoid Transfer of Property. The debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition on February 2, 1982. On January 4, 1982, the defendant received $415.18 from the Clerk of the State Court of Gwinnett County in execution of Garnishment Case No. MD-12195. This sum had been deducted from the debtor’s wages and paid into the court pursuant to a garnishment summons issued on a debt owed to the defendant. This transfer was within the statutory preference period of ninety days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. 11 U.S.C. § 547(b)(4)(A).

The issue before the Court is whether or not a debtor may avoid the transfer of garnishment funds to a creditor within the preference period under 11 U.S.C. § 547.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b)(4)(A), the trustee may avoid any transfer of property of the debtor made within ninety days before the date of the filing of the petition if certain other conditions are met. Under Georgia law, title to property that is the subject of a garnishment does not vest in the plaintiffs in the garnishment proceeding, but rather remains property “belonging to defendant.” *Ga.Code*§§ 46-605(b) and 46-709(b). *In re Evans,*16 B.R. 731, 8 B.C.D. 799 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1982). Thus, the transfer of garnishment funds is clearly the transfer of property of the debtor within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(40) and 547. *Id.*

The defendant contends that it must be shown that the funds transferred within the preference period of 11 U.S.C. § 547 were also earned within this ninety-day period prior to the filing of the petition. This contention is without merit. 11 U.S.C. § 547 contemplates transfer of property of the debtor. Thus, no matter when the debtor acquires an interest in property, any transfer of property of the debtor during the ninety-day preference period may be a voidable preference. 11 U.S.C. § 547. See also *In the Matter of Alford,*Adversary No. 81-2105A (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga., April 21, 1982). The Court finds that the transfer from the State Court of Gwinnett County to the defendant was a preferential transfer within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(40) and 547(b). Under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b), such a transfer of the property of the debtor may be avoided by the debtor.

Therefore, for the above-stated reasons, the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Judgment shall be awarded the plaintiffs in the amount of $415.18.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1998

# Note to Editors: NRC Postpones Meetings on Indian Point I Decommissioning

----

----

I-98-114

October 6, 1998

NOTE TO EDITORS:

**NRC POSTPONES MEETINGS ON INDIAN POINT I DECOMMISSIONING**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has postponed a meeting planned for tomorrow night regarding the decommissioning of Indian Point 1 nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y. The meeting had been scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Cortlandt Town Hall in Cortlandt, N.Y.

There was a conflict in the arrangements for a meeting hall.

A second meeting on decommissioning scheduled for October 21 at the Buchanan Village Hall has also been postponed.

A meeting on decommissioning will be scheduled at a later date.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gordon Quick, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Daleen Technologies, Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect, the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.                                                         /s/ GORDON QUICK  Date: May 17, 2004 Gordon Quick   President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| Dated: May 10, 2004  | /s/  MARK J. LEVIN            |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |                                         |   |
|                      | Mark J. Levin                           |   |
|                      | Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                      | (Principal executive officer)           |   |
|                      |                                    |   |

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MillenniumPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices

# Change Notices for 1995

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12581]

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation has renewed its charter for a period of two years.

# DATES:

The Charter was renewed on October 31, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions concerning the Committee, and the renewal of its Charter should be directed to Adam M. Howard, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, 2300 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20372 (Navy Potomac Annex), telephone (202) 955-0214; email                         *history@state.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Committee consists of nine members drawn from among historians, political scientists, archivists, international lawyers, and other social scientists who are distinguished in the field of U.S. foreign relations. This Advisory Committee will continue to make recommendations to the Historian and the Department of State on all aspects of the Department's program to publish the Foreign Relations of the United States series as well as on the Department's responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351,                     *et seq.*) to open its 25-year-old and older records for public review at the National Archives and Records Administration.                

Adam M. Howard,

Executive Secretary, Office of the Historian, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-27113 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-34-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,083
<PP&E>                                           4,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,983
<SALES>                                            213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   213
<CGS>                                              385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      22
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,761)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>
No. 82-5809.

#### Cunningham *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Wirch, Respondent, vs. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company and Byram and others, as Receivers, Appellants.

*November 5*

December *4, 1928.*

*318For the appellants there was a brief by *H. J. Killilea*and *Rodger M. Trump,*both of Milwaukee, and *Barber & Keefe*of Oshkosh, and oral argument by *Mr. Trump.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Wilbur E. Hurlbut*of Omro.

Eschweiler, J.

We can find no proper legal support for this judgment. The car was ordered by the shippers, Callieri Brothers, and it was delivered to and held at Omro station subject to their orders for an interstate shipment. The plaintiff cannot be considered as occupying the relationship of shipper so far as the railroad was concerned. Callieri Brothers al©ne had the lawful right to have the hay shipped and to require the defendant railroad company, under its duty towards shippers, to make out the bill of lading as it did and forward .the car according to their instructions. Contracts of this kind are no longer matters of private contract between carrier and shipper except on the prescribed forms. *Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. J. I. Case Plow Works,*173 Wis. 237, 240, 180 N. W. 846.

Even conceding that there vjas a sufficient consideration to support the claimed agreement between plaintiff and the station agent on behalf of defendants, a point upon which we express no opinion, nevertheless the defendants could not make a lawful contract with the plaintiff, an outsider, to in *319any way interrupt or interfere with their statutory and common-law duties as common carriers towards shippers. As against the rights of shippers the defendants could not contract to assume the inconsistent responsibility of aiding a third person, dealing with the shippers, or of substituting its aid for the remedies the law gives to such third person. The plaintiff therefore has no right to recover on any theory of a contract between him and the common carrier as to the shipment of this hay.

Neither can we sustain the judgment in this case as for a tort because of violation by defendants of any duty or obligation they or it owed or could lawfully assume to or towards the plaintiff.

*By the Coitrt.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the action.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:07:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Ginna Docket (050- 00244)

Oversight / IR130 - Inadequate suprevision / command and control P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 131 - Management expectations or directions LTA P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

29

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA I - Instrumentation & Control S - Surveillance 147 - Individual corrective action LTA G - Engineering G - Design 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency I - Instrumentation & Control S - Surveillance 

418

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Training / IR100 - Training LTA D - Emergency Planning D - Emergency Drill 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 185 - Procedural adherence LTA I - Instrumentation & Control S - Surveillance 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements D - Emergency Planning D - Emergency Drill 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering F - Modification 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

194 - Housekeeping LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

1255

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content I - Instrumentation & Control M - Maintenance / Repair 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:07:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Ginna Docket (050- 00244)

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

29

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 22
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Kallassy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesvExchange of 1934, amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thevfinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
May 14, 2010By:
/s/ John A. KallassyTitle:
Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.A., A.M.V., N.A.V., J.A.V., children

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00709

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 02310J

Trial court: 313th Distri ct Court of Harris County

This appeal involves the termination of the parent

- child relationship

. Ap pellant , R.M.,

has filed a n unopposed motion to exten d time to file his brief . The motion is GRAN TED

. Appe llant ’ s brief is due on Decembe r 28, 2020

.

B eca use this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final disp osition within 180 days of the date of the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R

. J UD

. A D MI N

. 6. 2 , reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T C OD E A NN

. , ti t. 2, subtit. F app. For this reason, no additional extensions of time to file a brief will b e gra nted absent

extraor dinary circumstances

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signat ure:

___________ /s/ Ju lie Countiss

_____ ______________ Acting individually

Date: December 10, 2020
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2000

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, March 16, 2020
null

2013-09-11

368.45383

eng - Argued: 2013-09-11. Docket number: 4-12-1032WC