alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0728

_________________

GBSB HOLDING, LLC,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 

COMMISSIONERS AND FLATHEAD 

COUNTY, MONTANA; WHITEFISH VILLAGE, 

LLC; WILLIAM F. OSWALD AND JULIANA 

M. OSWALD, Co-Trustees of the Oswald Family 

Trust dated May 23, 2016; SHAWN PATRICK 

JAMES AND KRISTIN PATRICIA BELL; 

WHITEFISH HILLS VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, INC.; and JOHN DOES 1 AND 

2,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time to and 

including May 17, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 11 2024

04/11/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0728
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             76,924
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,940,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,017,036
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,248,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              30,950
<BONDS>                                         3,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              10,000
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        457,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,248,135
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  230,817
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   21,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                241,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (32,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (32,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (32,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report of The  KingThomason
Group,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31,  2005 (the  "Report"),  I, T.E.  King III,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 19, 2006

                                                        /s/ Thomas E. King III
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        T.E. King III
                                                        Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1721 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1721

 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate at least one 
   city in the United States each year as an ``American World War II 
                    City'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2017

  Mr. Rouzer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate at least one 
   city in the United States each year as an ``American World War II 
                    City'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF AMERICAN WORLD WAR II CITIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall designate 
at least one city in the United States each year as an ``American World 
War II City''.
    (b) Criteria for Designation.--After the designation made under 
subsection (c), the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Defense, shall make each designation under subsection (a) based on the 
following criteria:
            (1) Contributions by a city to the war effort during World 
        War II, including those related to defense manufacturing, bond 
        drives, service in the Armed Forces, and the presence of 
        military facilities within the city.
            (2) Efforts by a city to preserve the history of the city's 
        contributions during World War II, including through the 
        establishment of preservation organizations or museums, 
        restoration of World War II facilities, and recognition of 
        World War II veterans.
    (c) First American World War II City.--The city of Wilmington, 
North Carolina, is designated as an ``American World War II City''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melvin Terry, Also Known as Terry Melvin, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 677]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered July 19, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion for a mistrial based upon a violation of the trial court’s *Sandoval*ruling was properly denied. Defendant correctly asserts that the prosecutor’s question about whether he had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge was a direct violation of the *Sandoval*ruling. However, the granting of a mistrial was not required, since defendant was not unduly prejudiced: he never answered the question, which was stricken, and the court promptly instructed the jury that a question never constitutes evidence *(see, People v Brown,*195 AD2d 419, 420, *lv denied*82 NY2d 804). Moreover, the prior assault conviction mentioned by the prosecutor was not similar to the charge for which defendant was on trial.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find they do not warrant corrective action. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 10, 2016

Order 

June 10, 2016

153394(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

SOFRONZO ERIC HORNE,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 153394

COA: 330188

Livingston CC: 14-021751-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on June 6, 2016, is accepted for 

filing.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3971-3972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ``Human Immunology Project 
Consortium (U19)''.
    Date: February 18-20, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[[Page 3972]]

    Agenda: To review grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lakshmi Ramachandra, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5061, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2153404c404249404f4553404d614f484048450f4f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd8f9c909c9e959c93998f9c91bd93949c9499d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 20, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-01227 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62326-62327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24472]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8500]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Toulouse-Lautrec and La Vie Moderne: Paris 1880-
1910''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.

[[Page 62327]]

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Toulouse-Lautrec and La Vie Moderne: Paris 1880-1910,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Nevada Museum 
of Art, Reno, Nevada, from on or about November 2, 2013, until on or 
about January 19, 2014, the Columbus Museum of Art, Columbus, Ohio, 
from on or about February 8, 2014, until on or about May 18, 2014, the 
Foothills Art Center, Golden, Colorado, from on or about June 7, 2014, 
until on or about August 17, 2014, the Society of the Four Arts, Palm 
Beach, Florida, from on or about December 5, 2014, until on or about 
January 11, 2015, the Crocker Art Museum, Sacramento, California, from 
on or about January 31, 2015, until on or about April 26, 2015, the 
Louisiana State University Museum of Art, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, from 
on or about September 5, 2015, until on or about November 15, 2015, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 4, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-24472 Filed 10-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Han Logistics, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Amee Han Lombardi, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: 4/15/2008 /s/Amee Han Lombardi Amee Han Lombardi, President/Secretary/Treasurer
#### In re STONECIPHER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. HS 81-86.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division.

Feb. 3, 1987.

*950C. Richard Crockett, Little Rock, Ark., for debtor.

J. Michael Fitzhugh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ft. Smith, Ark., for U.S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT F. FUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

*Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law*

Now before the Court for decision is the issue of whether pre-petition interest due and owing the United States on unpaid taxes subject to priority pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7)1 should also be afforded priority status.

The Bankruptcy Code accords priority status to certain “allowed secured *claims*of governmental units.” 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7) (emphasis added). “Claim,” as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(4), means a “right to payment.” This Court now concludes that the broad definition of “claim” includes a right to payment for the interest due. *See, e.g., Matter of Keller & Katkowsky, P.C.,*55 B.R. 155, 156 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Mich.1985); *In re Treister,*52 B.R. 735, 737 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1985); *In re Coleman,*26 B.R. 825, 831 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.1985) (debtor concedes priority claim under § 507(a)(6) [which is now § 507(a)(7) ] includes any interest that accrued on the claim pre-petition). *See also In re Hernando Appliances, Inc.,*41 B.R. 24 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Miss.1983) (discussing tax penalties as well as interest). *Contra In re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co.,*45 B.R. 917 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Ark.1984). Thus, interest on the pre-petition priority tax claim of the United States is entitled to the same priority status as the tax claim under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(7). In reaching its holding, the Court specifically overrules its opinion in *In re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co.,*45 B.R. at 924, as to its prior determination.

This opinion is to be applied prospectively only.

A separate Order in accordance with this opinion will be entered.

1

. Section 507(a)(7) was designated as 507(a)(6) prior to the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60156 Summary Calendar

__________________ ARTURO YANEZ-PENALOZA, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A35-933-046

- - - - - - - - - - December 13, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mexican citizen Arturo Yanez-Penaloza appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) deportation order and its denial of his motion for reconsideration and to reopen his deportation proceedings seeking readjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) (§ 245(i) of the Act) and 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (§ 212(c) of the Act). Yanez-Penaloza argues that the Board erred in basing its deportation decision on evidence presented during theNo. 95-60156 -2- relief stage of his proceedings. He also argues that the Board abused its discretion in denying his motion to reconsider or reopen by deciding that he was no longer eligible for § 212(c) relief after the final order of deportation. This court does not have jurisdiction to review the underlying deportation order because the petition for review was not filed within 90 days. See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(1); Stone v. I.N.S. , 115 S. Ct. 1537, 1542 (1995). Regarding the motion for reconsideration or to reopen, we have reviewed the record and the BIA's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION DISMISSED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, September 20, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Examinations, and Enforcement 
Matters. In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-20113 Filed 8-14-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur A. Harper, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 548]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered May 31, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree as the result of an incident in which he allegedly stole and used a credit card belonging to someone else. He was sentenced to a term of l1/2 to 41/2 years in prison. Initially, we reject defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not undertake certain tactical maneuvers. Upon review of the record, we find that his attorney provided meaningful representation under the circumstances presented. In addition, in view of the nature of the crime and defendant’s prior criminal conviction, we do not find that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### WM. D. MAHN and wife *v.*THE MECHANICS’ BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION.

(The Syllabus in this case is the same as in the preceding case of *Smith and wife*v. *The Mechanics' Building and Loan*Association, page 372.)

This was a civil actioN, similar to the two proceding against the same defendant, heard at the same time by his Honor, *Kerr, J.,*at Chambers in the county of New Hakover.

For the facts, and the orders made in the Court below, from which the plaintiff appealed — see the case of *Smith and wife*against the 6ame defendant, *ante*page 372.

*Strange, London*and *French,*for appellant.

*Smith <& Strong, Fowle*and *Batchelor,*contra.

*380Pearson, C. J.

Same opinion as in *Smith*v. *Mechanics’’ Building*c§ *Loan Association.*

Error, and judgment according to that opinion, which will be certified.

Per Curiam.

Order reveised.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shyue-Ching Lu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 22, 2009



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /S/    SHYUE-CHING
LU               
|Name:  |  | Shyue-Ching Lu                      
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer