Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices 5781 

1This and the subsequent notices mentioned in 

this notice, as well as comments received, 

supporting and related materials, and other 

documents can be viewed at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/ 

main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS–2007–0044. 

of § 340.6 describe the form that a 

petition for a determination of 

nonregulated status must take and the 

information that must be included in 

the petition. 

In a notice published in the Federal 

Register on June 27, 2005 (70 FR 36917– 

36919, Docket No. 04–085–3), APHIS 

advised the public of its determination, 

effective June 14, 2005, that the 

Monsanto and Forage Genetics 

International GE glyphosate-tolerant 

alfalfa lines designated as events J101 

and J163 were no longer considered 

regulated articles under the regulations 

governing the introduction of certain GE 

organisms. That determination was 

subsequently challenged in the United 

States District Court for the Northern 

District of California by the Center for 

Food Safety, other associations, and 

several organic alfalfa growers. The 

lawsuit alleged that APHIS’ decision to 

deregulate the GE alfalfa events J101 

and J163 violated the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the 

Endangered Species Act, and the Plant 

Protection Act. 

On February 13, 2007, the court in 

that case issued its memorandum and 

order in which it determined that 

APHIS had violated NEPA by not 

preparing an EIS in connection with its 

deregulation determination. The court 

ruled that the environmental assessment 

prepared by APHIS for its deregulation 

determination failed to adequately 

consider certain environmental impacts 

in violation of NEPA. The deregulation 

determination was vacated and APHIS 

was directed by the court to prepare an 

EIS in connection with making a new 

determination on the regulated status of 

the GE alfalfa. 

On December 18, 2009, the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register (74 FR 67206–67207, Docket 

No. ER–FRL–8986–6) announcing the 

availability of a draft EIS in connection 

with making a determination on the 

regulated status of the GE alfalfa. 

Comments on the draft EIS were to have 

been received on or before February 16, 

2010. APHIS subsequently published a 

notice 1 in the Federal Register on 

February 24, 2010 (75 FR 8299–8300, 

Docket No. APHIS–2007–0044), 

extending the comment period through 

March 3, 2010. 

In December 2010, APHIS published 

and distributed the final EIS, which 

included discussion of the public 

comments received on the draft EIS. On 

December 23, 2010, the Environmental 

Protection Agency published a notice in 

the Federal Register (75 FR 80807– 

80808, Docket No. ER–FRL–8994–3) 

announcing the availability of the final 

EIS. The NEPA implementing 

regulations in 40 CFR 1506.10 require a 

30-day review period between the time 

a final EIS is published and the time an 

agency makes a decision on an action 

covered by the EIS. APHIS received 

more than 16,000 comments on the final 

EIS by the time this review period 

ended on January 24, 2011. 

APHIS has reviewed the final EIS and 

has concluded that it has fully analyzed 

the issues covered by the draft EIS and 

those comments and suggestions 

submitted by commenters. APHIS has 

now prepared a record of decision based 

on the final EIS and is making that 

record available to the public. The 

record of decision and the final EIS on 

which the record of decision is based 

may be viewed on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/ 

component/ 

main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2007-0044. Copies of those documents 

may also be obtained from the person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

The record of decision has been 

prepared in accordance with: (1) NEPA, 

(2) regulations of the Council on 

Environmental Quality for 

implementing the procedural provisions 

of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3) 

USDA regulations implementing NEPA 

(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA 

Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 

372). 

Done in Washington, DC, this January 27, 

2011. 

Kevin Shea, 

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2268 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–34–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest 

Resource Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Uinta-Wasatch-Cache 

National Forest Resource Advisory 

Committee will conduct a meeting in 

Salt Lake City, Utah. The committee is 

meeting as authorized under the Secure 

Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343) 

and in compliance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 

is to continue the review of project 

submittals. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

February 17, 2011, from 3 p.m. to 5:30 

p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Salt Lake County Government 

Center, Room S1002, 2001 South State 

Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. Written 

comments should be sent to Loyal Clark, 

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 

88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601. 

Comments may also be sent via e-mail 

to lfclark@fs.fed.us, via facsimile to 

801–342–5144. 

All comments, including names and 

addresses when provided, are placed in 

the record and are available for 

inspection and copying. The public may 

inspect comments received at the UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest, 88 West 

100 North, Provo, Utah 84601. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Loyal Clark, RAC Coordinator, USDA, 

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 

88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601; 

801–342–5117; lfclark@fs.fed.us. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting is open to the public. The 

following business will be conducted: 

(1) review Forest Service project 

approval letter, and (2) review new 

proposals. Persons who wish to bring 

related matters to the attention of the 

Committee may file written statements 

with the Committee staff before or after 

the meeting. 

Dated: January 21, 2011. 

Cheryl Probert, 

Deputy Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2163 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting 

of the Texas Advisory Committee 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 

the provisions of the rules and 

regulations of the U.S. Commission on 

Civil Rights (Commission), and the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), that a planning meeting of the 

Texas Advisory Committee to the 

Commission will convene by conference 

call at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 

approximately 12 noon on Wednesday, 

February 23, 2011 at 2300 E. University 

Drive, Denton, TX, 76206. The purpose 

of this meeting is to discuss the 

Committee’s civil rights project on 

human trafficking. 

Members of the public are entitled to 

submit written comments; the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
5782 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices 

comments must be received in the 

regional office by March 23, 2011. The 

address is 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 

2010, Los Angeles, California 90012. 

Persons wishing to e-mail their 

comments or who desire additional 

information should contact Angelica 

Trevino, Administrative Assistant, at 

(213) 894–3437 or (800) 877–8339 for 

individuals who are deaf, hearing 

impaired, and/or have speech 

disabilities or by e-mail to: 

atrevino@usccr.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons who wish 

to submit written comments and require 

the services of a sign language 

interpreter should contact the Regional 

Office at least ten (10) working days 

before the scheduled date of the 

meeting. 

Records generated from this meeting 

may be inspected and reproduced at the 

Western Regional Office, as they become 

available, both before and after the 

meeting. Persons interested in the work 

of this advisory committee are advised 

to go to the Commission’s Web site, 

http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the 

Western Regional Office at the above email or street address. 

The meeting will be conducted 

pursuant to the provisions of the rules 

and regulations of the Commission and 

FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, January 27, 

2011. 

Peter Minarik, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs 

Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2213 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: Tag Recapture Card. 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0259. 

Form Number(s): NA. 

Type of Request: Regular submission. 

Number of Respondents: 240. 

Average Hours per Response: 2 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 8. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for 

the renewal of a currently approved 

information collection. 

The Cooperative Game Fish Tagging 

Program (CGFTP) was initiated in 1954 

by Woods Hole Oceanographic 

Institution (WHOI). In 1973 the CGFTP 

became a cooperative effort between 

WHOI and the National Marine 

Fisheries (NMFS) as part of a 

comprehensive research program 

resulting from passage of the Migratory 

Game Fish Study Act of 1959 (Pub. L. 

86–359) and other legislative acts under 

which the NMFS operates. In 1980 sole 

control of the CGFTP was handed over 

to the NMFS. The CGFTP was later 

renamed the Cooperative Tagging Center 

(CTC). The CTC attempts to determine 

the migratory patterns and other 

biological information of billfish, tunas, 

and swordfish by having fishermen tag 

and release their catch, so that fish can 

be subsequently recaptured. 

The primary objectives of a tagging 

program are to obtain scientific 

information on fish growth and 

movements necessary to assist in stock 

assessment and management. This is 

accomplished by the random recapture 

of tagged fish by fishermen and the 

subsequent voluntary submission of the 

appropriate data. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Diana Hynek, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

dHynek@doc.gov). 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Dated: January 28, 2011. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–2232 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–853] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From Canada: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a timely 

request by one manufacturer/exporter, 

Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL 

Canada), the Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on citric acid 

and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from 

Canada with respect to JBL Canada. The 

review covers the period November 20, 

2008, through May 19, 2009, and May 

29, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We 

preliminarily determine that JBL Canada 

made sales below normal value (NV). 

If the preliminary results are adopted 

in our final results of the administrative 

review, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 

4929, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In response to a timely request by JBL 

Canada, on June 30, 2010, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on citric acid 

from Canada with respect to JBL Canada 

covering the period November 20, 2008, 

through May 19, 2009, and May 29, 

2009, through April 30, 2010. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). 

Also on June 30, 2010, we issued the 

antidumping duty questionnaire to JBL 

Canada. In August 2010, we received 

responses to sections A (i.e., the section 

covering general information about the 

company), B (i.e., the section covering 

comparison-market sales), C (i.e., the 

section covering U.S. sales), and D (the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES