alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 749 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-438, K2025-435.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27894 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
No. 82-5826.

#### Foster *v.*Wainwright.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick R. Russ, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 350]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree brings up for review a decision denying defendant’s motion to suppress crack cocaine found in a car in which defendant was riding. As limited by his brief, the sole contention of defendant is that there was no basis for the stop of the vehicle.

A vehicle stop is lawful provided that there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity *(see, People v Sobotker,*43 NY2d 559; *People v Ingle,*36 NY2d 413). Here, the officers had reason to suspect that a passenger, whom they knew and believed to be younger than 21, had made an illegal purchase of alcohol *(see generally,*Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §§ 65, 65-a, 65-b) and that the alcohol purchased was in the vehicle occupied by three other apparently underage individuals. The officers’ observations gave rise to reasonable suspicion justifying the stop of the vehicle. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          49,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,484
<PP&E>                                         294,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,650
<BONDS>                                        352,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,657
<SALES>                                         70,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,012)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,123)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 19, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 1784 Lower Tribunal No. 18

- 36911

________________ 

### Joseph P. Klock, Jr., et al

. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Citibank, N.A., etc. , Appellee.

An Appeal from a non - final order from the Circuit Court for Miami

Dade County, Mark Blumstein , Judge. Obront Corey, PLLC, and Michael James Corey; Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., Susan E. Klock and Juan Carlos Antorcha , for appellant s

. Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee), William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), and Eric M. Levine (West Palm Beach) , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ , L I NDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.2 PER CURIAM

. Joseph P. Klock, Jr., and Susan M. Klock appeal from a nonfinal order denying their motion s to disqualify Akerman LLP from representing Citibank in this foreclosure action. Based on the contested allegations presented, the trial court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing

. Joseph and Susan M. both filed affidavits which create an issue (or issues) of fact material to the propriety of Akerman’s disqualification

. Josep h’s affidavit avers that he discussed the legal and factual matters underlying this case with his sister, Kathy Klock, an attorney who has been a partner at Akerman since 2014 . Joseph relies on the facts as presented in his affidavit to claim an attorney

- client relationship with his sister Kathy and a resulting irreconcilable conflict with Akerman’s representation of Citibank in this case

. Kathy’s affidavit , on the other hand, explains that no conversations occurred between her and her brothe r Joseph related to this case or previous foreclosure cases involving the same property, either before or after her arrival at Akerman, that could constitute an attorney

client relationship or otherwise give rise to a disqualification of the entire firm

. Th e current judge who will be tasked with making the ultimate determinations of fact abused his discretion in not conducting an3 evidentiary hearing under these circumstances. See Krumholz v. Guardianship of HK , 114 So. 3d 341 , 343 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ( citing Alvord v. Alvord , 572 So. 2d 925, 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Moore v. Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. , 664 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ). A trial judge may not rely on the record of an evidentiary hearing before a predecessor judge when the cu rrent judge will be required, as here, to make factual findings and assessments of credibility. See id

. Accordingly, we quash the order on appeal and remand to the trial court to conduct the requisite evidentiary hearing

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard F. Ambury, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                    |  |                         
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|               |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P.           
|               |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY          
|               |  | By: STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|               |  |                                   
|August 8, 2005 |  | By:                                |  | /s/ Richard F. Ambury   
|               |  |                                    |  | Richard F. Ambury       
|               |  |                                    |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|               |  |                                    |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P. 
|               |  |                                    |  | Star Gas Finance Company
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro to Visit Thailand July 23-25, 2022 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 468 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 94776)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-434, K2025-431.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27887 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
> CERTIFICATIONS



I, Richard Burdett, Chief Executive Officer of Balaton Power Inc., certify that;



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Balaton Power Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   	July 14, 2004



/s/ Richard Burdett
___________________________________

By:     Richard Burdett

Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel Exploratory Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions for NCCAM High Priority Research Topics (R34).                    

*Date:*                         February 27, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd. NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Deborah Ismond, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, NCCIH, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301.594.2704,                         *ismonddr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 16, 2015.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-01083 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27945]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 480 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-479, K2025-476.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27945 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
No. 86-5956.

#### Epps *v.*New York.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAMON E. JACKSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. K. SISTO, Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17331

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02502-FCDCMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011** 

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Lamon E. Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

FILED

OCT 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-17331

district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust, and for clear error its factual

determinations. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Jackson’s failure to

submit a timely inmate grievance appeal as to his failure-to-protect claim did not

constitute proper exhaustion. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 83-84, 93 (2006)

(“[P]roper exhaustion” is mandatory and cannot be satisfied by filing an

administrative grievance that is properly rejected as “untimely or otherwise

procedurally defective[.]”); see also Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 734 (2001)

(an inmate seeking only money damages must complete a prison administrative

process capable of addressing his complaint and providing some form of relief,

even if the process does not provide for the recovery of monetary relief).

We construe the dismissal of Jackson’s claims to be without prejudice. See

Wyatt, 315 F.3d at 1120 (explaining that if the court concludes that a prisoner has

failed to exhaust, the proper remedy is dismissal without prejudice).

Jackson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
EO 12866/13563 Interagency Comments - Methyl Bromide CUE proposed

rule

Frey, Nathan J. to: Jeremy Arling 07/28/2011 12:03 PM

Cc: Drusilla Hufford, JohnB Chamberlin, Diane McConkey, David

Donaldson

History: This message has been forwarded.

Attached please find interagency comments under EO 12866/13563 for the Methyl Bromide Critical Use

Exemption proposed rule (2060-AQ83). Please let me know if you have any questions.

EO12866MethylBromideCUE2060-AQ83NPRM20110615_Summary of Interagency Comments.docx