alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, J. Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 22nd  day of February, 2011.








J. BRIAN NICHOLSJ. Brian NicholsChief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1665 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To ensure that Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency considers severe local impact in 

making a recommendation to the President for a major 

disaster declaration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1665 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Declaration 

3 Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LOCAL IMPACT. 

5 In making recommendations to the President regard6 ing a major disaster declaration, the Administrator of the 

7 Federal Emergency Management Agency shall give great8 er weight and consideration to severe local impact or re9 cent multiple disasters. Further, the Administrator shall 

10 make corresponding adjustments to the Agency’s policies 

11 and regulations regarding such consideration. Not later 

12 than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, 

13 the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Trans14 portation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa15 tives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Gov16 ernmental Affairs of the Senate on the changes made to 

17 regulations and policies and the number of declarations 

18 that have been declared based on the new criteria. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SRADOVICH on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1999

# NRC Staff Sets Enforcement Conference with Duke Energy to Discuss Apparent Violation at Catawba Nuclear Station

----

----

No: II-99-38 June 24, 1999

 

**NRC STAFF SETS ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH DUKE ENERGY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION AT CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement conference in Atlanta on Monday, July 12, to discuss with Duke Energy Corporation an apparent violation of NRC requirements related to the potential inoperability of the Standby Shutdown System at the Catawba Nuclear Station near York, South Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. at the NRC's Region II office, located in the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street on the 24th floor. It is open to observation by interested members of the public and news media representatives. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the apparent violation resulted from two Standby Shutdown System circuit breakers being placed in the wrong position following maintenance work on December 16, 1998. Those circuit beakers remained in the wrong position until Duke personnel discovered the error on December 29, at which time the breakers were re-positioned and the Standby Shutdown System was restored to operable status. However, from December 16 until December 29, the system may have been unable to perform its intended function without operator action.

The Standby Shutdown System provides alternate and independent methods of maintaining one or both units in a hot standby condition following certain events that might take normal systems out of service.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violation, its causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports; and to enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsMemoranda of Understanding

# Memoranda of Understanding - 2020

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 6, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2013
          - 2011
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
          - 1995
          - 1994
          - 1993
          - 1992
          - 1991
          - 1990
          - 1989
          - 1988
          - 1987
          - 1986
          - 1985
          - 1984

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, May 6, 2022
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27925]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 767 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-461, K2025-458.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27925 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### Johnson, Appellant, vs. Brown and another, Respondents.

*October 12*

November *7, 1939.*

*643For the appellant there was a brief by *Eberlein & McCarthy,*attorneys, and *F. J. Grogan*of counsel, all of Shawano, and oral argument by *Mr. Grogan.*

*Giles H. Putnam*of New London, for the respondents.

Wickhem, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. In November, 1936, plaintiff was a farmer who supplemented his income on the farm by working in the woods. At that date he entered into a contract with defendants for cutting logs and cordwood. He was to- be paid a specified rate per thousand feet for the logs and cordwood, and at a piece rate for posts. He employed and paid a crew of men to' help with the operations. Plaintiff and his crew worked in the woods for defendants until he was hurt on the 15th of February. Before starting to work, plaintiff inquired of defendant Brown whether he and his men were insured under the compensation act, and was told that they were. At a later date Brown informed plaintiff that the insurance was going to expire on a certain date and asked him to try to complete his work by that date. A day or so afterwards Brown informed plaintiff that he was renewing the insurance. On the 15th of February, while running a saw, plaintiff slipped and was thrown against the saw, sustaining injuries to his left foot. Brown does not dispute plaintiff’s testimony. He supposed that his insurance covered plaintiff and his men, and so informed him. After his injury plaintiff made application under the compensation act, but it was held by the industrial commission that he was an independent contractor and not an employee, and compensation was refused. Upon the basis of these facts, plaintiff claims a right to recover upon an express contract.

We conclude that the trial court properly disposed of this case. The evidence warrants findings of the court that there was no separate contract to insure plaintiff or his men, and that no such an agreement was incorporated into' the principal contract. There was simply a representation, innocently *644made on the part of Brown, to the effect that his compensation insurance covered plaintiff. This was not based on mistake of fact because Brown had compensation insurance. It was based upon the assumption of both Brown and plaintiff that plaintiff was an employee of defendants and not an independent contractor. There being no misapprehension as to the facts, the mistake was one of law, one having to do with the legal effect of the principal contract. *Larson v. Industrial Comm.*224 Wis. 294, 271 N. W. 835. The complaint being grounded upon an express contract containing an agreement by defendants to effect or provide insurance to cover plaintiff and his men, it is evident that the proof does not sustain the complaint. Plaintiff stands upon the express contract, and the court found upon sufficient evidence that the contract contained no such agreement. Under these circumstances there is a failure of proof, and judgment dismissing the complaint was properly entered. See sec. 263.31, Stats.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul McFeeters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, asadopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: April 30, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Richard P. Powers, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Corgentech Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:

The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
"Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 21st day of March 2005.

| |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD P. POWERSRichard P. Powers
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Corgentech Inc. and will be ret ained by Corgentech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Corgentech Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
July 3, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JANTE LANGAN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01134

- CV V.

ERIC SCOTT LANGAN , Appellee

__________________________ ______ This cause, an appeal from the Final Decree of Divorce , signed September 13, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the Final Decree of Divorce . We order the Final Decree of Divorce of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Jante Langan , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1538 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission to minimize infringement on the exercise and enjoyment 

of property rights in issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mr. GRIFFITH (for himself, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. MULLIN, 

and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission to minimize infringement 

on the exercise and enjoyment of property rights in 

issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Home 

5 Owner Rights Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HYDROPOWER LICENSES. 

7 (a) LICENSES.—Section 4(e) of the Federal Power 

8 Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)) is amended— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1538 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘recreational oppor2 tunities,’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and minimizing infringement 

4 on the useful exercise and enjoyment of property 

5 rights held by nonlicensees’’ after ‘‘aspects of envi6 ronmental quality’’. 

7 (b) PRIVATE LANDOWNERSHIP.—Section 10 of the 

8 Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘, includ10 ing minimizing infringement on the useful exercise 

11 and enjoyment of property rights held by non12 licensees’’ after ‘‘section 4(e)’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(k) PRIVATE LANDOWNERSHIP.—In developing any 

15 recreational resource within the project boundary, the li16 censee shall consider private landownership as a means to 

17 encourage and facilitate— 

18 ‘‘(1) private investment; and 

19 ‘‘(2) increased tourism and recreational use.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Galaxy  Energy  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Marc E. Bruner,  President  (Chief Executive  Officer) of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ MARC E. BRUNER
----------------------------------------
Marc E. Bruner
President (Chief Executive Officer)
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/29 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) and
Star Gas Finance Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Cavanaugh, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership and Star Gas Finance Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                          |  |                               
|---------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|                 |  | STAR GAS PARTNERS, L.P. 
|                 |  | STAR GAS FINANCE COMPANY
|                 |  |                         
|                 |  | By:                      |  | STAR GAS LLC (General Partner)
|                 |  |                         
|February 9, 2007 |  | By:                      |  | /s/ JOSEPH P. CAVANAUGH       
|                 |  |                          |  | Joseph P. Cavanaugh           
|                 |  |                          |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|                 |  |                          |  | Star Gas Partners, L.P.       
|                 |  |                          |  | Star Gas Finance Company
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q  for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Finn, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange of 1934, amended; and  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
        November 14, 2008
  By:
        /s/ Thomas M. Finn
 Name:
        Thomas M. Finn
 Title:
        Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
   24
##### 



Exhibit 15 May 5, 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549 RE: Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries 1)
S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290 and Registration No. 333-83007) 1995
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and Individual Stock Options Granted to
Certain Directors and Employees Prior to the Adoption of the Plan 2). Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907 and Registration No. 333-55470)
1998 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan Commissioners: We are aware that our report dated April 15, 2004 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three month period ended March 27, 2004 and included in the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to above. Very truly yours, /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 38
Exhibit 32


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                           HORIZON FINANCIAL CORP.
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Horizon Financial Corp. (the "Company") and in connection with this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Report"), that:

      1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
           and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
           operations, as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
           financial statements included in the Report.



/s/ Richard P. Jacobson                  /s/ Greg B. Spear
-----------------------------            ----------------------------
Richard P. Jacobson                      Greg B. Spear
Chief Executive Officer                  Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  August 7, 2009


<PAGE>
No. 82-1136.

#### Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. *v.*Government Employees Credit Union et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.