alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1117 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 

submit a report regarding certain plans regarding assistance to applicants and 

grantees during the response to an emergency or disaster. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ACTION PLAN TO IMPROVE FIELD TRANSITION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) shall report to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 

and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs of the Senate regarding the plans the agency will undertake 

to provide the following: 

(1) Consistent guidance to applicants on FEMA disaster 

funding procedures during the response to an emergency or 

disaster. 

(2) Appropriate record maintenance and transfer of documents to new teams during staff transitions. 

(3) Accurate assistance to applicants and grantees to ease 

the administrative burden throughout the process of obtaining 

and monitoring assistance. 

(b) MAINTAINING RECORDS.—The report shall also include a 

plan for implementing operating procedures and document retention 

requirements to ensure the maintenance of appropriate records 

throughout the lifecycle of the emergency or disaster. 

(c) NEW TECHNOLOGIES.—Finally, the report shall identify new 

technologies that further aid the disaster workforce in partnering 

with State, local, and tribal governments and private nonprofits 

in the wake of a disaster or emergency to educate, assist, and 

inform applicants on the status of their emergency or disaster 

assistance applications and projects. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 82-975.

#### Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles et al. *v.*Taxpayers for Vincent et al.

Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6651

KEITH JEROME WHITE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-382-2) Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Jerome White, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Keith Jerome White seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Angelone , No. CA-01-382- 2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shant S. Hovnanian, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange of 1934, amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   February 14, 2011




By:
/s/ Shant S. HovnanianName:
Shant S. HovnanianTitle:
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.18**

 

**[LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]**

February 2, 2006 

 

Star Gas Partners, L.P. 

2187 Atlantic Street 

Stamford, Connecticut 06902 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

We have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Star Gas Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for thethree months ended December 31, 2005, and have read the Partnership’s statements contained in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 3, the Partnership changed its method of accounting foraccounting for inventory to the weighted average cost method from the first-in, first-out method and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it reflects a more accurate correlation betweenrevenues and product costs experienced in the Partnership’s business environment by normalizing the carrying cost of heating oil and other fuels given the increasing short-term volatility in the marketplace for these products. In accordancewith your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Partnership officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based. 

 

We have not audited any financial statements of the Partnership as of any date or for anyperiod subsequent to September 30, 2005, nor have we audited the information set forth in the aforementioned Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual informationcontained therein. 

 

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change,authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Partnership’s compliance with the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter. 

 

Based onour review and discussion, with reliance on management’s business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Partnership’s circumstances. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

**[Graphic appears here]**
No. 90-25.

#### Dillon, Commissioner of the Department of Insurance of Indiana, et al. *v.*Combs et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofT.J.T., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Larry B. Prescott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

                (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| /s/Larry B. Prescott    |
|-------------------------|
| Larry B. Prescott       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 14, 2005       |

 

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

1

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 93606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27857]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pursuant to Public Law 92-
463. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--CE25-021, Research Grants for 
Preventing Violence and Violence Related Injury.
    Dates: February 19-20, 2025.
    Times: 10 a.m.-5 p.m., EST.
    Place: Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Carlisha Gentles, Pharm.D., 
B.C.P.S., C.D.C.E.S., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for 
Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341. Telephone: (770) 488-1504; Email: [email protected].
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-27857 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         657,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,060,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,032
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,060,746
<SALES>                                        205,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,866
<CGS>                                          182,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 14, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 14, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0445. ROY LATIMORE v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 12SC110732
No. 82-1120.

#### Toraason *v.*Burkart.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

DOMINIC MUSOLINO 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2185-98-1 PER CURIAM 

 MAY 4, 1999 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 

 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 

A. Bonwill Shockley, Judge 

(Robert L. Samuel, Jr.; Michelle A. Hughes; 

Clark & Stant, P.C., on brief), for 

appellant. 

(Mark L. Earley, Attorney General; Ashley L. 

Taylor, Jr., Deputy Attorney General; 

Siran S. Faulders, Senior Assistant Attorney 

General; Daniel J. Poynor, Assistant 

Attorney General; Cheryl A. Wilkerson, 

Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 Dominic Musolino appeals the decision of the circuit court 

affirming the determination by the Virginia Department of Social 

Services (DSS) that allegations of sexual abuse, level one, by 

Musolino were founded. On appeal, Musolino contends that the 

trial court erred by determining that there was substantial 

evidence in the agency’s record to support the finding by clear 

and convincing evidence. Upon reviewing the record and briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, 

this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 -

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial 

court. See Rule 5A:27. 

 The standard of review of an agency's factual findings on 

appeal to a circuit court is limited to determining whether 

substantial evidence in the agency record supports its decision. 

See Code § 9-6.14:17; Turner v. Jackson, 14 Va. App. 423, 

429-30, 417 S.E.2d 881, 886 (1992). On appeal, we do not 

disturb factual findings if credible evidence supports them. 

See James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 

S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). "The reviewing court may reject the 

agency's findings of fact only if, considering the record as a 

whole, a reasonable mind would necessarily come to a different 

conclusion." Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231, 

242, 369 S.E.2d 1, 7 (1988). 

 DSS found, among other things, that, beginning the morning 

after the alleged sexual abuse incident, the child’s mother 

observed a red mark on the child’s cheek; the child displayed 

regressive behavior; the child told her mother that Musolino 

forced his penis into her mouth and told her to suck it, then 

struck her when she refused; and the child “consistently related 

the sexual abuse.” The record supports the agency’s finding 

that the four-year-old child described the incident consistently 

to her mother, the DSS worker, and a detective. The limited 

physical evidence and the mother’s testimony were also 
- 3 -

consistent with the child’s description of events. At no time 

did the child suggest that someone other than Musolino was the 

perpetrator. Therefore, because the record does not necessarily 

lead to a conclusion different than that found by the agency, we 

affirm the decision of the circuit court denying Musolino’s 

petition for review. 

 Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily 

affirmed. 

Affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 155 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording 

and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Worksite Reporting 

5 Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 155 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPATIONAL 

2 INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall 

5 revise the regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of 

6 Federal Regulations, concerning the recording and report7 ing of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occu8 pational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 

9 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a site 

10 log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring 

11 among all employees on the particular site, whether such 

12 employees are employed directly by the site-controlling em13 ployer or are employed by contractors or temporary help 

14 or employee leasing services. 

15 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

16 ‘‘site-controlling employer’’ means the employer that has 

17 primary control over the work on a particular work site 

18 and supervises the employees on a day-to-day basis on a 

19 particular work site. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Order entered November I, 2012

In The

NO. 05-12-00595-CV

BILLY AND CANDACE SCHOPPE, Appellants

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-I0731

ORDER

The Court has before it appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for

Morgan Stanley Loan Trust 2005-7’s October 24, 2012 unopposed motion to extend time to file

its brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the brief tendered by appellee on

October 24, 2012 be timely filed as of today’s date.

MOLLY

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.6








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Stantec Inc. (the "Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  I, Daniel J. Lefaivre, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
  Date:  February 24, 2011
/s/ Daniel J. Lefaivre

DANIEL J. LEFAIVRE, CMA

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 16 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Browns Ferry 2 Docket (050- 00260)

Oversight / IR131 - Management expectations or directions LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 143 - Tracking / trending LTA X - Site-wide X - Site-wide 143 - Tracking / trending LTA X - Site-wide X - Site-wide 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 146 - Evaluation LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

744

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA G - Engineering G - Design 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering G - Design 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA H - Health Physics 

H - Health Physics

850

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 16
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER SPENCE,

 Defendant Below, 

 Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

 Plaintiff Below, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 400, 2019

Court Below: Superior Court 

of the State of Delaware

ID. No. 1208011625A (N)

Submitted: March 18, 2020

Decided: April 9, 2020

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 9th day of April 2020, the Court having considered this on the briefs filed 

by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Superior Court should 

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its 

order dated August 20, 2019.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice