alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,655
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,639,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 345,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,501,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,062,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,501,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               547,597
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   247,972
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.26


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. 7th Fleet Task Forces 71, 75, 76 form SAG in the South China Sea

By Lt. Lauren ChatmasCommand Destroyer Squadron 7 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3259-3260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00989]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:


[[Page 3260]]


    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Yale University by the Division of 
Materials Research (DMR) #1203.

    Dates & Times:
February 18, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

February 19, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.

February 20, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: Yale University, New Haven, CT.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division 
of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Yale University.
    Agenda:

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed-Briefing of panel

Thursday, February 19, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open-Review of the MRSEC
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed-Executive Session
6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open-Dinner

Friday, February 20, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed-Executive Session
9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed-Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These 
matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 15, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00989 Filed 1-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Thomas, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J., at unavailability hearing; Bruce Allen, J., at trial and sentence), rendered July 27, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The unavailability of two witnesses who had testified against defendant at his first trial was established by proof adequate to *550show that they had moved to unknown addresses in foreign countries, and, accordingly, that prior testimony was properly received into evidence (CPL 670.10 [1]; *Mancusi v Stubbs,*408 US 204; *People v Tumerman,*133 AD2d 714, *lv denied 70*NY2d 938, *cert denied*485 US 969). There is no merit to defendant’s claim that such testimony, given at a prior trial of the same charge and subjected to full cross-examination (196 AD2d 462, *lv denied*82 NY2d 904), is unreliable *(see, People v Arroyo,*54 NY2d 567, *cert denied*456 US 979). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.
|Exhibit 99.4
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|In connection with the Annual Report of Prana
Biotechnology Limited (the  "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June
30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Colin  Masters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002,  that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the  Company.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Colin Masters *
      Colin Masters 
      Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------



|January 6, 2003
|---------------

|* |  | The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the  Company's
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Travis Peterkin, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1015]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted *(see, People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 166

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               BALATON POWER INC.


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 20F for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by Balaton Power Inc. ("Registrant"),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to their knowledge:


         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.


         August 6, 2003                            /s/ Richard Burdett
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Richard Burdett
                                                   Chief Executive Officer



         August 6, 2003                            /s/ Robert Wyllie
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Robert Wyllie
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SECOND QUARTER ENDED JULY 1, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002531
<NAME> TOLLGRADE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                      20,773,332
<SECURITIES>                                24,666,179
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,677,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                   177,811
<INVENTORY>                                 21,635,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,667,884
<PP&E>                                      11,294,917
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,586,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,021,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,256,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,606,112
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,148,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,021,437
<SALES>                                     29,666,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,666,710
<CGS>                                       11,413,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,413,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,177,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,024,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,153,879
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
exh10-4.htm


 










Exhibit 10.4



[This document has been translated from Chinese to English]




 


Lease Agreement







Lessor (Party A):                                Shaoxing Red Green Blue Trading Co. Ltd.



	
Address:

	
1788 Keqiao Lake Road East, Shaoxing County, Zhejiang Province.







Legal Representative: Guotong Chen







Lessee (Party B):   Shaoxing China Textile City High School



	
Address:

	
1788 Keqiao Lake Road East, Shaoxing County, Zhejiang Province.







Legal Representative: Guotong Chen


 

 


Through consultation, the above parties reached lease agreement as follows







I           Property for rent:Located at 1788 Keqiao Lake Road East, Shaoxing County, Zhejiang Province.








	
1、  

	
Land size 31,171.3 square meters(Land use certificate Shaoxing County Guoyong (2005) # 12-39) including all structures and buildings on this land, and the buildings identified in Shao Keqiao Real Estate License #38221, #38219, #38220 comprising approximately 18486.50 square meters of space.













	
2、  

	
Land size 71548.7 Square meters (Land use certificate Shaoxing County Guoyong (2005) # 12-38),including all structures and buildings on this land, and the buildings identified in Shao Keqiao Real Estate License #38217, #38218, #38222 comprising approximately 21728.71 square meters of space.。












II           Rent Term:from 1 / 1 / 2011 to 12 / 31 / 2020.







III           Purpose of Rent:Party B promised that all rental housing are used for educational purposes, Including student classrooms, laboratories, sports field, cafeteria, etc. that are used for educational purpose.







IV           Rent: RMB 30,000,000/ ten years, covers from 1 / 1 / 2011 to 12 / 31 / 2020, which is RMB 3,000,000/year.  Rent payment method: within one year after this Agreement is signed, Party B shall pay 10 years’ rent to Party A in one payment, which is RMB 30,000,000. Party A confirms receipt of the rent paid by Party B for the full 10 year term.







V           This rent is Party A’s net income, all relevant taxes are Party B’s responsibility.


 


VI   Maintenance: in case maintenance needed, Party B shall issue written report 15 days ahead of time, upon Party A’s approval, Party A will assign maintenance staff, the fees are paid by Party B.




VII   Party B is responsible for the safety of all rented housing, with rational use, it shall not damage the construction structure within the term. If Party B plans to renew the lease upon the expiration of the Agreement, it shall notify Part A within three month before the expiration date of the Agreement, under the same conditions, Party B has the priority to lease the properties.








 


VIII   Such agreement becomes valid once is signed and stamped by both parties. This agreement is in two copies, each party holds one









	
  

	
Party A: Shaoxing Red Green Blue Trading Co., Ltd. (Seal)








	
  

	
Signed by:/s/ Guotong Chen








	
  

	
Date: 11/12/2010













	
  

	
Party B: Shaoxing China Textile City High School (Seal)








	
  

	
Signed by: /s/ Guotong Chen








	
  

	
Date: 11/12/2010
#### Narob Development Corp. et al., Respondents, v Insurance Company of North America, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 155]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 26, 1994, after jury trial, in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $187,695, with interest from April 4, 1992, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint dismissed, without costs.

The policy exclusion at issue barred recovery by plaintiffs, and the trial court erred in denying defendant a directed verdict. After finding that the evidence presented at trial established that the retaining wall collapsed due to plaintiffs’ defective workmanship and that the first sentence of "Exclusion 9” of the insurance policy barred recovery by plaintiffs, the trial court misinterpreted the second sentence, which provides an exception to the exclusion and reads as follows: "Workmanship or Materials We won’t cover any loss caused by or resulting from error, omission or deficiency in workmanship or materials as respects the cost of making good such error, omission or deficiency. However, we will cover *resulting*physical *loss caused by or to*the Covered Property.” (Emphasis added.)

Where a property insurance policy contains an exclusion with an exception for ensuing loss, courts have sought to assure that the exception does not supersede the exclusion by disallowing coverage for ensuing loss directly related to the original excluded risk (see, *Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Yates,*344 F2d 939; *80 Broad St. Co. v United States Fire Ins. Co.,*88 Misc 2d 706, 707, *affd*54 AD2d 888; *Acme Galvanizing Co. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co.,*221 Cal App 3d 170, 270 Cal Rptr 405). Here, inasmuch as there was no collateral or subsequent damage or loss as a result of the collapse of the free-standing retaining wall, the exception should not have been at issue. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                     EXHIBIT 15





May 11, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         RE:  Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries
              -----------------------------------------------

     1).  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4290 and Registration No. 333-83007)
          1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and Individual Stock
          Options Granted to Certain Directors and Employees Prior to the
          Adoption of the Plan

     2).  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-52907 and Registration No. 333-55470)
          1998 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 11, 2001 on our review of interim
financial information of Tollgrade Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
and for the three month period ended March 31, 2001 and included in the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements referred to above.


Very truly yours,


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
No. 90-6197.

#### Estrada *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
aske8kex1011.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 






1






 






2






 






3






 






4






 






5






 






6






 






7






 






8






 






9






 






10






 






11






 






12






 






13






 






14






 






15






 






16






 






17
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Stellar
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Schmidt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Richard A Schmidt
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Richard A. Schmidt
                                               Chief Executive Officer
November 2, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We  consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-102796  of  Georgian  Bancorporation,  Inc.  on Form S-8 of our report dated
January  30,  2003  that  is  contained  in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Georgian  Bancorporation,  Inc.  for the year ended December 31, 2003 and to all
references  to  our  firm  and  to  such  opinion  as  are  contained  therein.



/s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC
Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2004


<PAGE>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, TMI to Discuss Emergency Exercise Deficiencies

----

----

I-97-46

April 28, 1997

NRC, TMI TO DISCUSS EMERGENCY EXERCISE DEFICIENCIES

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with managers of the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant on Wednesday, April 30, to discuss the plant's root cause analysis of weaknesses found during a March 5 emergency preparedness drill at the Middletown, Pa., facility. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. at NRC Region 1 offices in King of Prussia, Pa.

It will be open to the public for observation only.

An NRC team which evaluated the TMI exercise determined there were four areas of weakness: 1.) during the drill, the emergency response organization did not recognize conditions at the facility had degraded to the point that it was necessary to declare a "general emergency"; 2.) initially, the response organization incorrectly evaluated steam generator tube leakage; 3.) the technical analysis of the simulated accident conditions provided to response organization managers by the technical support staff was inadequate; and 4.) the response organization staff did not assess the need for protective action recommendations to off-site officials when dose projections appeared to indicate protective action guidelines would be exceeded beyond the 10-mile emergency planning zone.

The NRC sent a confirmatory action letter to plant operator GPU Nuclear Corporation in March to confirm commitments by the company to deal with the weaknesses, including a root cause analysis. Agency staff also met with plant managers at the site on March 17 to discuss the deficiencies.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021