alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMC, INC. FILED FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,714
<PP&E>                                         338,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                 142,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,516
<BONDS>                                        167,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,173
<OTHER-SE>                                    (129,440)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,537
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   183
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First American Scientific Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, John Brian Nichols, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of May, 2006.



| | JOHN BRIAN NICHOLS     
| | -----------------------
| | John Brian Nichols     
| | Chief Executive Officer





















---
#### CONSOLIDATED SERVICE CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Robert ROBINSON, etc., et al.

No. 82-658.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 10, 1983.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Soldiers Ensure Overseas Training, Readiness Continue Amid Pandemic

By Joseph LacdanArmy News Service

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Judy A. Prunchak et al., Appellants, v Anthony M. Palumbo et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 1007]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict of no cause of action in favor of defendants. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence and is supported by legally sufficient evidence *(see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 498). Plaintiff’s contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to instruct the jury regarding the 1964 New York State Building Code was not properly preserved for our review by objection to the charge as given *(see, Bichler v Lilly & Co.,*55 NY2d 571, 583). The court’s refusal to charge the jury that a person may assume that the sidewalk over which he or she is travelling is in a safe condition does not require reversal. The jury found that defendant was not negligent and thus never reached the issue of comparative negligence.

We have reviewed the remaining contentions raised by plaintiff and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Sprague, J. — Negligence.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00038-CR

RONNY JOE STANDIFER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-122-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronny Joe Standifer was convicted of aggravated assault causing serious bodily 

injury which was enhanced to a first degree felony because of a prior felony conviction. 

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. 22.02 (West 2011). He was sentenced to life in prison. 

Because error, if any, has not been preserved, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The victim of the crime died of cancer before trial. 

Standifer contends the State was allowed to ask improper commitment 

questions. In his sole issue, Standifer complains that the trial court erred in permitting 
Standifer v. State Page 2

“the prosecution to ask the voir dire panel what evidence the panel wanted at trial 

when the alleged victim would not testify.” 

During voir dire, the State asked, “[h]ow would you prove something without 

the victim – the person that was actually there who was injured?” Standifer objected to 

the question as an improper commitment question. That objection was overruled. The 

State did not, however, press the question with the voir dire panel and obtain an 

answer. Rather, the State moved on and when the State rephrased the question, two 

questions later, and asked, “What [type of evidence] would you want to see,” Standifer 

did not object. 

A colloquy followed that ended with the State and prospective jurors discussing 

other types of evidence to prove the crime other than testimony of the victim. But no 

objections were made after the State rephrased the question and moved on to the 

discussion. Accordingly, error, if any, is not preserved. TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1.

Standifer’s sole issue is overruled. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed September 10, 2015

Do not publish 

[CRPM]
#### 68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, *ET AL.,*PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued April 26, 1977

Decided May 13, 1977.

Before Judges Lynch, Milmed and Antell.

*Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr.*argued the cause for appellant *(Messrs. Gigante & Aslanian,*attorneys).

*Mr. Howard M. Nashel*argued the cause for respondents *(Messrs. Platoff, Heftler, Harker & Nashel,*attorneys).

*48Per Curiam.

The portions of the order for judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion reported at 142 *N. J. Super.*546 (Law Div. 1976).
No. 82-5772.

#### Shaffer et al. *v.*Board of School Directors of the Albert Gallatin Area School District et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 90-754.

#### Perkins *v.*Farm Credit Bank of Wichita et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 5

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590

REPLY TO THE AITENTION OF:

AT-I8J

Terry Sweitzer

Illinois EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control

1021 North Grand Avenue East

P.O. Box 19276

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

Dear Mr. Sweitzer,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reviewed and approved Illinois

Environmental Protection Agency's Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan. This plan

encompassed the monitoring network maintained by IEPA as well as Cook County Department of

Environmental Quality. We expect that this plan will be in effect throughout the 2008 calendar

year. If unanticipated events arise that require any change, please notify and consult with Region

5 prior to implementing changes to the monitoring network. Region 5 acknowledges the planning

and resources it took to compile, produce, seek comment, and submit this plan. We appreciate

the opportunity for Region 5 to provide feedback on your plan, and we are pleased to see that our

comments were addressed in the final draft.

IEPA's 2008 network plan indicates that the auto gas chromatography measurements in Chicago

(Site ID 170310072) and Northbrook (Site ID 170314201). While the minimum required PAMS

monitoring locations and frequencies (Table D-6 of Appendix D to Part 58) are being met by

IEPA, EPA encourages IEPA to continue the auto gas chromatography measurements during the

PAMs season at the Northbrook monitoring site. EPA is currently performing a national-scale

PAMs network assessment, the results of which should be considered prior to making changes in

the speciated VOC measurements.

As you are aware, Region 5 provided an extension ofthe deadline for submitting the annual

network plan in 2007. To be consistent with EPA's other regional offices; the 2008 plans must be

submitted to Region 5 by July 1,2008. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact

Loretta Lehrman at 312-886-5482.

q;;;:e-- Loretta Lehrman, Section Chief

Air Monitoring and Analysis Section

cc:

Kevin Givens

Cook County Department of Environmental Control

69 West Washington Street Ste 1900

Chicago, IL 60602

Recycled/Recyclable· Printed willl Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (50% Postcol1sumer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

 Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation on Thursday January 15, 2015 at the conclusion of the Open Meeting.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

## Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement—80 FR 1030 (January 8, 2015)

This meeting will be continued on February 10, 2015.

* * * * *

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2015-00905 Filed 1-15-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNews Releases1997

# NRC, SCE Officials to Discuss Apparent Violation at San Onofre

----

----

RIV-5597

September 26, 1997

**NRC, SCE OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION AT SAN ONOFRE**

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference next week with officials of the Southern California Edison Co. to discuss an apparent violation of NRC requirements at the San Onofre nuclear power plant.

The conference will begin at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 30, at the NRC Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. SCE operates the San Onofre plant near San Clemente, California. The meeting will be open to the public for observation; NRC officials will be available afterwards for questions.

An NRC inspection conducted on various dates in June through September of this year found an apparent violation in SCE's failure to take corrective actions to prevent recurrence of cracking in instrumentation nozzles on the reactor coolant system. Cracks have been observed in nozzles manufactured in one particular batch. SCE's approach has been to replace the nozzles as cracks are detected, rather than replacing nozzles from the batch in question as a preventive measure.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC has made a final determination that a violation did occur or that enforcement action, such as a monetary fine, will be taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violation, its cause and safety significance; to provide SCE an opportunity to challenge or correct portions of the NRC inspection report; and for the licensee to outline its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any enforcement action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made later by senior NRC officials.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Order filed April 15, 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 20

- 00837

- CR

____________

EX PARTE ANDRE BAILEY , Appellant

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 3

Harris County, Texa s

Trial Court Cause No. 2324058



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 23, 2020. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Be cause the reporter’s reco rd

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days

of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, a nd Hassan.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27946]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 481 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-483, K2025-480.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27946 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
North Highlands Bog Marsh Report 2005 – Part 3

Remember, these are just some of the places to see wetlands. Virtually every state park in 

Minnesota has at least some kind of wetland to experience. From floodplain forests along river 

bottoms to the Lake Superior shoreline to streams and waterfalls to the compelling story of 

groundwater in Mystery Cave, each park has a unique story to tell you about the value of 

wetlands.
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM





Janel
World Trade Ltd.


150-14
132nd
Avenue


Jamaica,
New York 11434





Gentlemen:





We have
issued our report dated December 29, 2008 accompanying the financial statements
of Janel World Trade Ltd. and subsidiaries contained in the Form 10-K under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  We consent to the use of
the aforementioned report in the Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.





/S/   PARITZ & COMPANY,
      P.A.Paritz
      & Company, P.A.





Hackensack,
New Jersey


January
14, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

                       
                        
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                                 3473
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1663756
<ALLOWANCES>                         (20000)       
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1658166
<PP&E>                              2601056
<DEPRECIATION>                     (1293275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      2970848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1422673
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              62625
<OTHER-SE>                          1414277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        2970848
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2687365
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2423364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      10000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     6478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      258103
<INCOME-TAX>                          99000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  159103
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         159103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .025
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .024
        


</TABLE>
No: I-19-021 July 29, 2019

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, 610-337-5331

New NRC Resident Inspector Assigned to Millstone Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected Eben Allen as the new resident inspector at Millstone Station in 

Waterford, Conn. He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Justin Fuller and 

Resident Inspector Chris Highley at the site, operated by Dominion Nuclear.

Allen joined the agency at NRC headquarters in 2013, where he 

worked as a project manager for spent fuels in the Office of Nuclear 

Materials Safety and Safeguards, and as a project manager for research and 

test reactors in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Allen has worked 

as a reactor engineer in Region I since 2017.

He served for six years in the United States Navy as a machinist mate aboard the 

USS Alaska. He holds a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering technology from Thomas Edison 

State University, a master’s degree in nuclear engineering with an emphasis in health physics, and a 

graduate certificate in nuclear security and safeguards from the University of Missouri. He was an 

NRC-licensed reactor operator at the University of Missouri’s Research Reactor

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can be assigned to any one 

site for up to seven years.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized and each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that (1) this Report complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the registrant. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 9-6 has been provided to Travelzoo Inc.
and will be retained by Travelzoo Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission on request.



| |               
| | --------------
| | TRAVELZOO INC.



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ RALPH BARTEL

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| |                             
| | Ralph Bartel                
| | Chairman of the Board,      
| | Chief Executive Officer, and
| | Chief Financial Officer     

Date: March 29, 2004