alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Terry Rouse, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 46]

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The detailed misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer who observed the incident and cosigned by another correction officer who also observed the incident, constitutes substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]), prohibiting the possession of contraband that may be classified as a weapon *(see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin,*76 NY2d 964, 966; *Matter of Perez v Wilmot,*67 NY2d 615, 616-617). Petitioner’s denial of the charge presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer *(see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, supra,*at 966; *Matter of Perez v Wilmot, supra,*at 617). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
No. 82-5633.

#### Kunitake *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2
Cronos Global Income Fund XVI, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATIONS
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cronos GlobalIncome Fund XVI, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ JOHN KALLASJohn KallasVice President andChief Financial Officer of CCC
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/02 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark B. Hoffman, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of Commerce One,Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2004

/s/ Mark B.Hoffman
#### National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, v Accadia Enterprises, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 999]

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in severing separately numbered claims alleged in plaintiff’s amended complaint *(see,*CPLR 603; *County of Chenango Indus. Dev. Agency v Lockwood Greene Engrs.,*111 AD2d 508) and removing them to several town courts *(see,*CPLR 325 [d]; 22 NYCRR 202.13 [e]). Those claims are related and involve similar legal issues. Additionally, severance and removal of those claims would increase the amount of litigation and place an unnecessary burden on the several town courts by requiring multiple trials instead of one trial *(see, Shanley v Callanan Indus.,*54 NY2d 52, 57; *see also,*Siegel, NY Prac § 127, at 193 [2d ed]).

By failing to brief the issue, plaintiff abandoned its appeal from that part of the order that denied without prejudice to renew defendant’s cross motion for a protective order. Furthermore, by failing to brief the issue, defendant abandoned its cross appeal from that part of the order that denied its cross motion for a protective order.

We have reviewed the remaining contentions advanced by the parties and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Therefore, we modify the order on appeal by deleting the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth ordering paragraphs and we deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and for sanctions and costs. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Severance and Transfer.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 20(b)

                    ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


                          Officer's Certificate
                          ---------------------

     I, George E. Borst, President and Chief Executive Officer of Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation ("TMCC"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  a review of the activities of TMCC as Servicer under the Sale and
          Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated April 1, 2001 among
          TMCC, Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC as Seller, and
          Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. as Trustee, for the period from
          April 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002 and of the performance of the
          Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (b)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
          period.



Date:  April 10, 2002                         /S/ GEORGE E. BORST
                                        ------------------------------------
                                                  George E. Borst
                                                   President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Lara, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 526]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), rendered September 29, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation *(see, People v Flores,*84 NY2d 184, 187; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147).

Further, the sentence imposed upon the defendant was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
OMB Control No. 2070-0054; EPA ICR No. 0586.12

Attachment B

Display Related to OMB Control #2070-0054

Listings of Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1.
Display Related to OMB Control #2070-0054 - Listings of 

Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1

As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of 

Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 

27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control 

number for the following regulations:

Program Title 40 CFR citation

Chemical Information Rules.....................................................................................................712.5

 ........................................................................................................712.7

 ......................................................................................................712.20

 .....................................................................................................712.28

 ....................................................................................................712.30

Dibenzo-para-dioxin/Dibenzofurans............................................................................. 766.35(b)(1)

........................................................................... 766.35(b)(2)

..................................................................... 766.35(b)(4)(iii)

........................................................................766.35(c)(1)(i)

.......................................................................766.35(c)(1)(ii)

.....................................................................................766.38

Good Laboratory Practice Standards................................................................................... Part 792
##### 



Exhibit 4.1




---



##### 



MICROMET, INC.
    TEN COM-
TEN ENT-
    
    as tenants in common
as tenants by the entiretiesJT TEN-
    
    as joint tenants with right ofsurvivorship and not as tenantsin commonCOM PROP-
    
    as community property
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    
    
    (Minor)under Uniform Gifts to MinorsAct(State)
 UNIF TRF MIN ACT-
    
    
    
    Custodian (until age
    
    )(Cust)under Uniform Transfers(Minor)to Minors Act(State)
  
  
 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
     IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)
 
 
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint _______________________________________________________________________________________attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.
  NOTICE:
    THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
  WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.


|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Signature Guaranteed                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | 
|THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. | 
|
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for August 2023 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 17 

2. Cases Added to Docket 3 

The Penta Building Group, LLC 

21-0575 

Direction for Review on August 10, 2023 

East West Seafoods LLD, dba F/V Pacific Producer 

23-0236 

Direction for Review on August 22, 2023 

Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. 

20-0306 

Direction for Review on August 29, 2023 

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket 0 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 20
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick W. McTaggart, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Frederick W. McTaggartFrederick W. McTaggartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# RED FLAG-Alaska 22-3: 3rd Operations Support Squadron Weather Flight Clears the Skies

By Senior Airman Jack LaymanJBER Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Thomas O. Dwyer *v.*Henry G. Cutler.

From Hertford.

A single Magistrate has no jurisdiction of actions, founded upon *a*covenant of guaranty.

This action was originally commenced by a warrant, and was founded upon the following instrument:

*“*I llave 111 i.r; day transferred to *Thomas 0. Dwyer,*a note of *Arthur Lawrence*for ninety-five dollars, dated the 30th day of August last, and payable the 5tti of September, 1826, which note I guarantee unto the said *Thomas O. Dwyer,*or his assigns, for value received. Wit» ness my hand and seal, October 12,1826.

*“*HENRY 6. CUTLER.”

On the trial, it was objected on the part of the Defendant, that a Justice of the Peace had no jurisdiction of the subject. The objection was overruled by his honor Judge Martin, and a verdict being returned for the Plaintiff, and judgment entered accordingly, the Defen-dent apdealed.

The case was submitted without argument *by Gaston,*for the Plaintiff. No Counsel appeared for the Defendant

*313Tati,or, Chief-Justice,

The act of 1820, extending the jurisdiction of Justices to one hundred dollars, does not embrace this case. The words are, “ bonds, notes and liquidated accounts.” There is a guaranty under seal, on which the sole, remedy is by an action of cove* want, in which damages would be recovered for the nonperformance of the guaranty.

It was certainly not the design of the act, that Magistrates should have jurisdiction of a case, in which questions are likely to arise, which it would be difficul» for them to settle. The construction of a guaranty, the extent of the obligation imposed by it, and the degree of diligence which, under the circumstances of the case, the Plaintiff' is bound to use, require the consideration of a Jury, aided by a Court qualified to instruct them.

There ought to be a new trial.

Per Curiam.* — -Judgment reversed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 05, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 05, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1473. AYAZ, INC. v. PREMIER PETROLEUM, INC..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>          0000928447
<NAME>         G/O INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                              <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997               
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997               
<CASH>                             11,677                   
<SECURITIES>                       0                        
<RECEIVABLES>                      60,000                        
<ALLOWANCES>                       0                        
<INVENTORY>                        0                           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   71,677               
<PP&E>                             0                        
<DEPRECIATION>                     0                        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     123,817                    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              67,631                       
<BONDS>                            0                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0                        
<PREFERRED>                        0                                  
<COMMON>                           60,354                    
<OTHER-SE>                        (83,332)                    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       123,817                   
<SALES>                            60,000                       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   60,000                       
<CGS>                              41,770                       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      41,770                  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   33,885                
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0                       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 627                       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (627)                    
<INCOME-TAX>                       0                       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0                           
<DISCONTINUED>                     0                       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0                       
<CHANGES>                          0                       
<NET-INCOME>                      (10,780)                    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.00)                  
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.00)                  
                        

</TABLE>