alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Schaefer, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Rambo and others, Appellants.

*May 10*

June *20, 1932.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *D. J. Regan*and *Wengert & Moeller,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Eitgene Wengert.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Anderson, Donovan & Steinle,*and oral argument by *George H. Daum,*all of Milwaukee.

Owen, J.

This action was brought to recover damages resulting from the wrongful death of Fred Schaefer, deceased. The appellants do not question their liability. Two grounds of error are assigned. One such ground of error *422is based upon the admission in evidence of the American Experience Table of Mortality. It is not the contention of appellants that the jury should not have been permitted to consider this table, but rather that the court should have taken cognizance of the contents of the table and communicated the material information contained therein to the jury as a part of its charge.

It has long been settled that mortality tables are properly receivable in evidence. *Secord v. John Schroeder L. Co.*160 Wis. 1, 150 N. W. 971; 19 Ruling Case Law, p. 216. But whether a court should take judicial knowledge of their contents and instruct the jury with reference thereto as a matter of law, is a question not presented by the issues in this case, although the propriety thereof is strenuously urged by appellants’ counsel. It will be time enough to consider this question when it is presented. In the present case the tables were received in evidence, and that cannot be held to constitute error.

The other gro.und of error assigned relates to the damages. It is contended that the damages awarded ($8,700) are excessive. In this amount is included burial expenses, which leaves for the widow, for whose benefit this action is maintained, an amount slightly in excess of $8,000. The deceased was sixty-five years of age.' Plis life expectancy was 11.10 years according to the American Experience Table of Mortality. He and his wife had reared ten children. He had acquired a homestead of the value of $4,200. He was a grading contractor and did team work. His average earnings were $200 per month, all of which he turned over to his wife, who dispensed the same for the family benefit. The up-keep of the horses was approximately $425' per year. Under these circumstances we consider the award well supported by the evidence.

Appellants claim the damages are excessive when compared with the damages approved in *Rogers v. Lurye Furni*
      *423
      *ture Co.*193 Wis. 496, 211 N. W. 782, 215 N. W. 457. We do not agree. Rogers was five years older than plaintiff’s decedent. His earning capacity at the time of his death was no greater. The earning capacity of Rogers prior to his death had commenced to decline, a circumstance which does not appear from the evidence in this case with respect to decedent.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XVI,
L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas,
Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their
knowledge, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Registrant.

August 12, 2003

| |    |  |                                                                                                                                     
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant
|
| |    |  | /s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos
Capital Corp., General Partner of the Registrant                      

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAR 2 7 2014 

Eastern Region 

Regional Counsel 

Telephone: 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

FIRST CLASS MAL AND TELEF AX (301)294-2525 

Mr. Jared MAllen 

Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

RECEIVED 

APR - B 2314 

HEARING DOCKET 

RE: Wing Air, LLC, Docket No. FAA-2013-0849, Case No. 2012EA110052 

Dear iv!r. Allen: 

To avoid any procedural confusion that may arise from the fact that Agency, back in 

January 2014, served its first set of interrogatories, request for production of documents, 

and request for admissions (which to date have not been responded to) prior to the setting of 

the Order Setting Litigation Dates And Procedures dated March 18, 2014, 1 the Agency 

hereby withdraws (without prejudice) that discovery requests and files instead, on this date, 

a new first set of interrogatories, request for production of documents, and request for 

admission (enclosed). This "new" set of discovery is substantively with the first setoff 

1 Confusion as to when the responses are due and when a motion to compel would be due. 
discovery, only sets a new deadline for responding. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

Enclosure 

CC (via first class mail and telefax): Judge J.E. Sullivan, U.S. Administrative Law Judge, 

Office of Hearings, M-20, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avejnue, 

S.E. (Ell-310), Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 

CC (via first class mail): Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 

S.W., Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright 

Building, Suite 2W1000
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Coast Guard Welcomes New Commanding Officer to Helm of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Kimball 

By Chief Petty Officer Sara MuirU.S. Coast Guard District 14 Hawaii Pacific 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
AFS-11-117-E February 24, 2011 Exemption No. 8842B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26746

Mr. David L. Jones Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Dear Mr. Jones:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8842, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Decem ber 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aviation Institute of Ma intenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under Air Agency Certificate Q5VT572K) for an extension of Exemption No. 8842, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8842, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8842, as amended, to February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8842 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8842.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 64 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Farley 2 Docket (050- 00364)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA D - Emergency Planning S - Surveillance 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA G - Engineering G - Design 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical H - Health Physics 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 173 - Physical conditions LTA M - Mechanical H - Health Physics 

526

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

316

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR147 - Individual corrective action LTA E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA E - Electrical O - Control Room Ops 

211

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements D - Emergency Planning S - Surveillance 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering G - Design 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical H - Health Physics 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA I - Instrumentation & Control T - Testing 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

947

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                                           
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                                         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997                        
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997                        
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997                        
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                        
<CASH>                                          18,591                        
<SECURITIES>                                    40,935                        
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,294                        
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                        
<INVENTORY>                                          0                        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,589                        
<PP&E>                                          36,806                        
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,075)                        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,981                        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,156                        
<BONDS>                                              0                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                        
<PREFERRED>                                          0                        
<COMMON>                                            29                        
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,611                        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,981                        
<SALES>                                              0                        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,372                        
<CGS>                                                0                        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,522                        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 303                        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,477)                        
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,477)                        
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                        
<CHANGES>                                            0                        
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,477)                        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)                        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                        
                                                                              

</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0604 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2012 - SW - 110 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1362 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, 

the Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1362 RFS

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

3 PAGO PAGO, AMERICAN SAMOA. 

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs community5 based outpatient clinic in Pago Pago, American Samoa, 

6 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 

7 and designated as the ‘‘Faleomavaega Eni Fa’aua’a 

8 Hunkin VA Clinic’’. Any reference to such community9 based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, docu10 ment, record, or other paper of the United States shall 

11 be considered to be a reference to the Faleomavaega Eni 

12 Fa’aua’a Hunkin VA Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 7, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 90-6107.

#### Addleman *v.*Board of Prison Terms and Paroles et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 91-6219.

#### Vereb *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Decision approving the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs, adopted in Geneva on 2 July 1999

COM(2005) 687 final — 2005/0273 (CNS)

and the

Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 40/94 to give effect to the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs

COM(2005) 689 final — 2005/0274 (CNS)

(2006/C 309/07)

On 17 February 2006 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 308 and 300 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

On 14 February 2006 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 308 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and (EC) No 40/94 to give effect to the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs

COM(2005) 689 final — 2005/0274 (CNS).

The Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 31 May 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Bryan Cassidy.

At its 428th plenary session, held on 5 and 6 July 2006 (meeting of 5 July), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 155 votes to 3 with 2 abstentions.

1.   Executive summary of EESC conclusions and recommendations

The two Commission proposals are linked and will therefore be taken in one document for the purposes of the EESC's consideration.

The EESC fully supports the Commission proposals.

2.   Main elements of the Commission proposals

3.   Specific comments

4.   Costs

Brussels, 5 July 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  They are: Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain. The EU itself is not at present a member of the Hague system.

----