alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The U.S. and Vietnam Celebrate 30th Anniversary of Sustained Operations to Account for Americans Missing from War

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2011
    
    /s/ Spiro Rombotis

Spiro RombotisPresident & Chief Executive Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 120 

To reduce the amount of foreign assistance to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, 

and El Salvador based on the number of unaccompanied alien children 

who are nationals or citizens of such countries and who in the preceding 

fiscal year are placed in Federal custody by reason of their immigration 

status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To reduce the amount of foreign assistance to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador based on the number 

of unaccompanied alien children who are nationals or 

citizens of such countries and who in the preceding fiscal 

year are placed in Federal custody by reason of their 

immigration status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unaccompanied Alien 

5 Children Assistance Control Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 120 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF AMOUNT OF FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 

2 TO MEXICO, GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, AND 

3 EL SALVADOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall reduce from 

5 amounts made available under the Foreign Assistance Act 

6 of 1961 or any other Act and allocated for a covered coun7 try for a fiscal year an amount equal to— 

8 (1) the number of unaccompanied alien children 

9 who— 

10 (A) are nationals or citizens of the covered 

11 country, and 

12 (B) in the preceding fiscal year are placed 

13 in Federal custody by reason of their immigra14 tion status, multiplied by 

15 (2) $15,000. 

16 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

17 (1) the term ‘‘covered country’’ means Mexico, 

18 Guatemala, Honduras, or El Salvador; and 

19 (2) the term ‘‘unaccompanied alien child’’ has 

20 the meaning given the term in section 462(g)(2) of 

21 the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 

22 279(g)(2)). 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act takes effect on the 

24 date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect 

25 to amounts made available under the Foreign Assistance 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 120 IH

1 Act of 1961 or any other Act for fiscal year 2017 and 

2 each subsequent fiscal year. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
  By
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Rodney Lozinski, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DRAVCO MINING INC.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|/s/
Rodney Lozinski         | Date:  March 30, 2004
|--------------------------- | ---------------------
|Rodney Lozinski             |                      
|Principal Executive Officer |                      
|Principal Financial Officer |
**EXHIBIT12.1**

 

**EQUINOXHOLDINGS, INC.**

**Computationof Earnings to Fixed Charges**

**AllFigures in Thousands, Except Ratios**

 
| ** **                                        | ** ** | **Year ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                        | ** ** | **2004**                    | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
| ** **                                        | ** ** | ** **                  | ** ** | **(Restated)** | ** ** | **(Restated)** | ** ** | **(Restated)** | ** ** | **(Restated)** | ** ** |
| Earnings available for fixed charges              |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income (loss) before income taxes                 |       | $                           | (342       | ) | $ | (14,679 | ) | $ | 3,572 |   | $ | 4,614 |   | $ | 2,527 |   |
| Add: Fixed charges before preferred  dividends    |       | 20,881                      |       | 37,175 |   | 15,258 |   | 15,496 |   | 4,415 |   |
| **Total earnings available for fixed charges**    | ** ** | **$**                       | **20,539** | ** ** | **$** | **22,496** | ** ** | **$** | **18,830** | ** ** | **$** | **20,110** | ** ** | **$** | **6,942** | ** ** |
|                                              |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges                                     |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                  |       | $                           | 16,622     |   | $ | 33,791 |   | $ | 12,747 |   | $ | 13,310 |   | $ | 2,423 |   |
| Rental and occupancy expense                      |       | 4,259                       |       | 3,384 |   | 2,511 |   | 2,186 |   | 1,992 |   |
| Total fixed charges before preferred  dividends   |       | 20,881                      |       | 37,175 |   | 15,258 |   | 15,496 |   | 4,415 |   |
| Preferred dividends                               |       | —                      |       | 82 |   | 335 |   | 157 |   | — |   |
| **Total fixed charges**                           | ** ** | **$**                       | **20,881** | ** ** | **$** | **37,257** | ** ** | **$** | **15,593** | ** ** | **$** | **15,653** | ** ** | **$** | **4,415** | ** ** |
| ** **                                        | ** ** | ** **                  | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| **Coverage (deficit) earnings to fixed  charges** | ** ** | **$**                       | **(342**   | **)** | **$** | **(14,761** | **)** | **1.21** | ** ** | **1.28** | ** ** | **1.57** | ** ** |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S181]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, following leader remarks, there will be a 
period of morning business with Senators allowed to speak for up to 10 
minutes each. All Senators are invited to gather in the Senate Chamber 
at 12:45 p.m. to proceed to the Hall of the House for the counting of 
electoral ballots. The joint session will commence at 1 p.m. The Senate 
will recess from 3:30 until 4:45 to allow for a special Democratic 
caucus meeting. If none have been to the counting of the electoral 
ballots, it is quite historic and interesting, and people should 
consider going to that.

                          ____________________
```
#### Henneman and others, Appellants, vs. Finnegan, Attorney General, and others, Respondents.

*December 7, 1934*

March *5, 1935.*

For the appellant Henneman there was a brief by *W. H. Stafford*and *Harold E. Stafford,*both of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by *Harold E. Stafford.*

*J. C. Doerfer*of West Allis, for the appellants Edwards Motor Company, Bailey Motor Company, and King-Braeger Company.

For the respondents James E. Finnegan and Lawrence C. Whittet there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Joseph G. Hirschberg,*deputy attorney general, and *C. G. Mathys*of Madison, special counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Hirschberg*and *Mr. Mathys.*

For the respondents L. D. Frint and Jesse A. Smith there was a brief by *Harry E. White, George A. Schutt,*and *Rix, Barney & Kuelthau,*attorneys, and *Carl B. Rix*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Rix.*

A brief was also filed by *Emily W. Thomann*of Madison, on behalf of the consumer, as *amicus curice.*

*By the Court.*

Judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Martin, J., took no part.
NASA Comments, Draft IRIS Revised Toxicological Review of Benzo(a)Pyrene, June 28, 2012

NASA thanks EPA for the opportunity to review and comment on the revised draft assessment of 

Benzo(a)Pyrene. We reviewed the document in light of the technical content and also considering EPA’s 

commitment to clarity, transparency, and responsiveness, in light of the NAS recommendations for 

improvements in the IRIS process.

NASA notes that the revised draft provides a clearer, concise format and discussion of the assessment 

process. NASA also found that several significant technical issues identified in the previous interagency 

review of the draft assessment were integrated into the expanded set of charge questions, thereby 

increasing the strength and depth of the planned peer review of the document. EPA’s consolidation of 

key studies and findings into a separate summary also serves as a significant improvement over the 

previous version. Overall, these improvements supported a more accessible, easily read document, 

especially when compared to the previous version. NASA commends EPA for taking these basic steps, 

mirroring some of the specific recommendations identified in previous interagency reviews, as well as, 

the NAS Report on Formaldehyde.

Below are the summaries of NASA’s outstanding issues:

The revised draft, as in the previous draft, does not provide clear explanation of why 

Benzo(a)Pyrene serves as the appropriate index chemical for the entire group of chemicals 

defined as Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons or PAHs. EPA continues to use references to studies or 

results on Benzo(a)Pyrene (BAP) interchangeably with discussion of the general group of PAHs. 

Previous assessments or EPA guidance identifying the rational as to why BAP merits being the 

index chemical should be referenced for both completeness and consistency. As BAP is most 

often associated with human exposure through cigarette smoking and eating of charred meats, 

EPA needs to clarify why this one chemical is the best choice as the index chemical for a diverse 

set of chemicals in the environment.

With the extensive body of literature and studies on BAP in recent years, EPA’s choice of specific 

studies with UF of 300 and 3000 continues to raise significant questions as to the 

appropriateness of the chosen studies as the basis of defined action levels. Documentation of 

impacts due to inhalation of cigarette smoke, a significant source of humor exposure of BAP, do 

not factor into this assessment and the RfC is based on a study with the maximum amount of 

UF generally used at 3000 highlights ongoing questions with EPA’s choice of studies as the basis 

of RfDs and RfCs.

Again, NASA thanks EPA for the opportunity to review and comment on the revised draft. EPA has 

improved the format, clarity and presentation of data, as well as, including specific outstanding technical 

and scientific issues into the proposed draft charge questions for peer review. NASA notes that 

significant technical issues, including the reliance on individual studies that result in very high UF, remain 

an ongoing concern.
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Emerging Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: | August 15, 2005 |
|-------|-----------------|

 

| /s/ Christopher G. Payan |
|--------------------------|

Christopher G. Payan

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

| /s/ Brian P. Alessi |
|---------------------|

Brian P. Alessi

Chief Financial Officer 

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

 

 

1
#### In the Matter of Maria Elizabeth A., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. St. Vincent’s Services, Inc., Respondent; Elizabeth G., Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 334]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered December 13, 1993, which, insofar as appealed from, terminated respondent’s parental rights following a fact-finding determination that she had permanently neglected the subject child, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner child care agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption by the child’s foster parents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the Family Court that adoption by the child’s foster parents is in her best interests. Contrary to respondent’s *504contention, for dispositional purposes no presumption favors the child’s aunt or any other member of what respondent calls the child’s "natural extended family” *(see, Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147-148; *see also, Matter of Netfa P.,*115 AD2d 390, 392; *Matter of Michael W.,*191 AD2d 287). Nor did the court err in denying respondent a second adjournment of the dispositional hearing so that she might contact the child’s aunt and present her as a possible resource for the child, respondent having failed to explain why she did not take advantage of the two-month adjournment already given her for that purpose, and the aunt having expressed to petitioner agency no interest in becoming a permanent resource for the child. Respondent’s argument that her constitutional rights were violated by permitting petitioner agency rather than the probation department to prepare a report pursuant to Family Court Act § 625 (b) is moot, since no such report was prepared. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
R2 = 0.0124

R2 = 0.7015

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

Reported Formaldehyde Emissions (ppm @ 7% O2)

Reported Carbon Monoxide Emissions (ppm @ 7% O2)

Chart H-1a: Reported Formaldehyde Emissions vs. Reported CO 

Emissions - All Data

0-150 ppm CO

150+ ppm CO

Linear (0-150 ppm CO)

Linear (150+ ppm CO)
y = 1E-05x2 - 0.0029x + 0.2586

R2 = 0.0669

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 100 200 300 400

Reported Formaldehyde Emissions (ppm @ 7% O2)

Reported Carbon Monoxide Emissions (ppm @ 7% O2)

Chart 4: Reported Formaldehyde Emissions vs. Reported CO Emissions -

All Data 0 to 1000 ppm CO @ 7% O2 (Quadratic)

0-1000 ppm CO

Poly. (0-1000 ppm CO)

Minimum Values on Quadratic 

Polynomial Regression Line:

Formaldehyde: 0.095 ppm @ 7% O2

CO: 196 ppm @ 7% O2
H. R. 1301 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

Making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2017, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SEC. 101. The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (division 

D of Public Law 115–56) is further amended by inserting after 

section 165 the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 166. (a) Employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

in appropriations which begins on or about February 9, 2018, shall 

be compensated at their standard rate of compensation, for the 

period of such lapse in appropriations, as soon as practicable after 

such lapse in appropriations ends. 

‘‘(b) For purposes of this section, ‘employee’ means: 

‘‘(1) a Federal employee; 

‘‘(2) an employee of the District of Columbia Courts; 

‘‘(3) an employee of the Public Defender Service for the 

District of Columbia; or 

‘‘(4) a District of Columbia Government employee. 

‘‘(c) All obligations incurred in anticipation of the appropriations 

made and authority granted by this division for the purposes of 

maintaining the essential level of activity to protect life and property and bringing about orderly termination of Government functions, and for purposes as otherwise authorized by law, are hereby 

ratified and approved if otherwise in accord with the provisions 

of this division.’’. 

SEC. 102. For the purposes of division D of Public Law 115– 

56, the time covered by such division shall be considered to include 

the period which began on or about February 9, 2018, during 

which there occurred a lapse in appropriations. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Appropriations 

Amendments Act, 2018’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
-r--; zJ0-03 -·. ' , ' ' . 

~~~~~~~~~~---~~·b.·q,_~\~ ' ' 

.. --=-.ffil-_·e~XCLws\iL,_Qu(. ____ ~-:--- . -

==--.I-a--,-_e~~~o.ltr ___ ·~ :t__ ____ roo~e.jj=mn~ · 

--.\._-~_-~----_ l-~ ~-_ i-~~-~~-~. --~.- OOUJU ~EGE~VE~~N~-- OF CRIMINAL APPEAlS ' ' 

FEB 17 2015 

_- __ ---;-\ ~S Ab3t.Acosta,-Cierk---

.• ~~~~~· _· -·~~s-ts= _____ _ 

~---,------,--~1 -- -- -~~-1~,1-: -~ 

------'-----c--.l ~-u 5:: ~_,___·. ~ --~---~--~~·~\~~~-----_· ---

~--~~-----~-----~.-~·.,:-, ~ 

.. :