alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries



|                                               |  |                                
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation  
|Analogic Limited                               |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANALOGIC FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION             |  | U.S. Virgin Islands            
|Analogic China Holding Limited                 |  | Hong Kong                      
|Analogic Holding Luxembourg S.a.r.l.           |  | Luxembourg                     
|Analogic Japan KK                              |  | Japan                          
|Analogic Medical Equipment (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                          
|ANALOGIC SECURITIES CORPORATION                |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE II CORPORATION                     |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANA/DVENTURE 3 CORPORATION                     |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE DELAWARE, INC.                     |  | Delaware                       
|ANRAD CORPORATION                              |  | Province of Nova Scotia, Canada
|B-K Medical Holding ApS                        |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical ApS                                |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical AB                                 |  | Sweden                         
|B-K Medical Benelux NV/SA                      |  | Belgium                        
|B-K Medical Medizinische Systeme GmbH          |  | Germany                        
|B-K Medicale S.r.L                             |  | Italy                          
|B-K Medical Systems, Inc.                      |  | Massachusetts                  
|Copley Motion Systems, LLC                     |  | Delaware                       
|FTNI Inc.                                      |  | Province of Quebec, Canada     
|Sound Technology, Inc.                         |  | Pennsylvania
#### Weymouth, Appellant, vs. Gray and others, Respondents.

*March 6*

April *3, 1918.*

*Vendor and purchaser: Nature of vendor’s title under will: Defeasi-ble fee.*

A widow who, under her husband’s will, took the absolute title to real property subject to be defeated by her remarriage, and was not given the power of disposition, cannot convey a good and marketable title in fee simple.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Douglas county: EbaNK A. Eoss, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *D. E. Roberts*of Superior, and for the respondents on that of *Grace & Fridley*of Superior.

WiNSLow, C. J.

This is an action brought by the vendor for specific performance of a contract to sell and convey land. The plaintiff appeals from an order overruling a general demurrer to the answer. The question raised is whether, under the allegations of the answer, the plaintiff can convey a good and marketable title in fee simple to the land.

Plaintiff’s title is derived from the will of her deceased husband, Daniel A. Weymouth, by which the testator directed that all of his property should go to the plaintiff “so long as she shall remain singlein case of her marriage she to have the homestead and one third of all other property, the balance to go to the testator’s brothers and sisters. The will was construed by this court in the case of *Will of Wey*mouth, 165 Wis. 455, 161 N. W. 373, and it was held that it gave to the plaintiff absolute title to the property (other than the homestead), subject to be defeated by breach of the limitation in the will. The property in question here is a part of the property other than the homestead. We think it very plain that the plaintiff cannot convey an absolute fee *219simple. . It is not necessary to ’ bestow any name upon- ber title. We are paying less regard to tbe technical names of estates and the refined distinctions which were the joy of the ancient real-estate lawyers every year. The testator was entitled to give the plaintiff jnst snch an interest as he chose in the property, providing it was not forbidden by or contrary to the statute. He chose to give her an estate which wonld terminate (as to two thirds of the property) if she married again. He intended his brothers and sisters to take the two thirds upon the happening of that event. Manifestly he did not intend that the plaintiff should have the power to defeat the claim of his brothers and sisters simply by making a conveyance of the property. There is nothing in the statutes contrary to such a disposition of. real property; in fact the statute seems to contemplate it favorably. Secs. 2051, 2056, and 2059. The will does not invest the plaintiff with the power of disposition, in addition to the estate granted, as in *Roberts v.*Lewis, 153 U. S. 367, 14 Sup. Ct. 945. No words in the will indicate the wish of the testator to invest the plaintiff with that power.

*By the Oourt.*— Order affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Philippines Cut the Ribbon on Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement Project

U.S. Embassy In the Philippines

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
No. 91-6092.

#### Dennis *v.*Dowdle, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Casino Journal
Publishing Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2002

/s/ Glenn Fine Glenn Fine,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Casino Journal
Publishing Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2002

 /s/ Alan R. Woinski
Alan R. Woinski, President and Chief Financial
Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 5th Air Force Vice Commander Visits Misawa Air Base

By Airman 1st Class China M. Shock35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to Mission India Staff

U.S. Embassy & Consulates in India

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### M A N D A T E

TO THE 198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 22, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Kristi Rene Nix, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04

- 13

- 00569

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. B11614

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Any other pending motions for relief are DENIED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 29, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS America Completes Integrated Industrial Firefighting Drill 

By Lt. John StevensUSS America Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DOANE
PRODUCTS COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (93)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,614
<PP&E>                                         118,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,455)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,412
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,277
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,728
<SALES>                                        140,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,191
<CGS>                                          119,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1,547
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7441

MCRAE DEMETRICE RIDDICK,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JIM O’SULLIVAN, Sheriff,

 Respondent - Appellee,

and

UNKNOWN; CHESAPEAKE CITY JAIL,

 Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00094-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: March 16, 2020 Decided: March 26, 2020

Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

McRae Demetrice Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

McRae Demetrice Riddick seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Riddick has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED
LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,208
<SECURITIES>                                    10,229
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                       236
<INVENTORY>                                     20,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,922
<PP&E>                                          37,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,529
<BONDS>                                         22,952
<COMMON>                                            13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,320
<SALES>                                         22,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,334
<CGS>                                           11,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,074
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,882
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001002577
<NAME> T.J.T. INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              75
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                      3,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,091
<PP&E>                                           3,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,320
<SALES>                                         26,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,305
<CGS>                                           21,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    44
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     61
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (14)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>