alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF OMNIPOINT CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         214,602
<SECURITIES>                                    25,778
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,382
<INVENTORY>                                     35,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,782
<PP&E>                                       1,302,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                (229,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,158,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          428,799
<BONDS>                                        612,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    491,658
<COMMON>                                           534
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,232,685)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,158,676
<SALES>                                        157,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,317
<CGS>                                          150,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               242,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (126,490)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (370,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (370,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (370,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (6.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.97)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0685

DIAMOND V. CORPORATION, INC., a 

Montana corporation, GRANT KUBESH, 

MARY KUBESH, ZACH RUBESH and 

BARBARA KUBESH,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

BUCKHORN ENERGY OAKS

DISPOSAL SERVICES, LLC, a foreign 

limited liability company, and

DAWSON COUNTY, a political 

subdivision of the STATE OF 

MONTANA,

 Defendants and Appellees.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Daniela E. Pavuk, whose name appears next on the list 

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

01/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0685
_ 

DATED this January 27, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jordan Walter FitzGerald, Jordan.fitzgerald@moultonbellingham.com

Adam Tunning, adam.tunning@moultonbellingham.com

Benjamin J. Alke, balke@cristlaw.com

Harlan B. Krogh, hkrogh@cristlaw.com

Ben T. Sather, ben@satherlawfirm.com

Daniela E. Pavuk, dpavuk@pafuklaw.com
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Welcomes Sri Lanka's Contribution to Security in the Indo-Asia- Pacific Region

By U.S. Embassy Colombo

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Adm. Harry Harris, Commander, U.S. Pacific Command - Galle Dialogue

----

USS Somerset Supports 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit Exchange with Sri Lanka Marines

----

US Marines, Sailors Work with Sri Lanka Navy, Newly-Minted Marine Corps

More News
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

INFINITY SELECT INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Petitioner

v.

TARRIE FLEMING, IVY SHELBY PATE,

STEVEN L. PATE AND DUAN WILLIAMS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 37 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|   | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      17, 2008 |                               |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                 |                               |
|                                 |                               |
|                                 |                               |
|                                 |                               |
|                                 | Peter      James Lee               |
|                                 | Secretary      and                 |
|                                 | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                                 | (Principal      Financial Officer) |
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices1998

# Change Notice 98-019

Issue Date: 12/11/98

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

 

 

----

 

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 17, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1545 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1545

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the authority of the 
 Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose certain patient information 
   to State controlled substance monitoring programs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Prescription Data Accountability 
Act 2017''.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS DISCLOSURE OF PATIENT INFORMATION 
              TO STATE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE MONITORING PROGRAMS.

    Section 5701(l) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Under'';
            (2) by striking ``a veteran or the dependent of a veteran'' 
        and inserting ``a covered individual''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) In this subsection, a `covered individual' is an individual 
who is dispensed medication prescribed by an employee of the Department 
or by a non-Department provider authorized to prescribe such medication 
by the Department.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1545

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the authority of the 
 Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose certain patient information 
   to State controlled substance monitoring programs, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Wyllie, Chief Financial Officer of Balaton Power Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|By:    | /s/ Robert Wyllie      
|------ | -----------------------
|Name:  | Robert Wyllie          
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  | July 15, 2004          





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	President Obama Visits Marine Corps Base Hawaii to Thank Troops
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">President Obama Visits Marine Corps Base Hawaii to Thank Troops</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By DoD News</b> <span class="date">/ Published Dec. 27, 2016</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    WASHINGTON, Dec. 25, 2016 — While speaking to service members today, Dec. 25, 2016, at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, President Barack Obama said, “it has been the privilege of my life to serve as your commander in chief.”<br /><br />The president said he and Michelle know how it feels to stand alongside military families and veterans, according to remarks released by the White House today.<br /><br />“This is one of our favorite things to do, because it's one of those circumstances where we get a chance to not just say thank you to our incredible men and women in uniform but, oftentimes, we also get a chance to see some families,” the soon to be outgoing commander in chief said.<br /><br />The president said he is thankful for the “unbelievable service” service members have rendered the country.<br /><br />“Yesterday, I called -- as I do every Christmas -- some of our folks that are stationed overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan and some in some very remote spots; some of them who, as we speak, are carrying out missions to defeat ISIL, carrying out missions to protect us from all manner of threat,” the president said.<br /><br />"As tough as it is to be deployed, the people here in America, back home, understand that every single day that you're serving, you're fighting for our freedom and fighting to keep us safe and fighting to maintain our way of life,” the president said. “It's impossible for us to fully repay what you've done and the sacrifices you make. But at least it's important to hear from us that what you do matters, and that we know about it, and that we're grateful, and that we'll stay grateful even when many of you end up being out of uniform and are veterans, and that we make sure that we're serving you as well you served us.”<br /><br />“And although this will be my last time addressing you as President, I want you to know that, as a citizen, my gratitude will remain and our commitment to standing by you every step of the way -- that won't stop,” the president said.<br /><br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
#### In re Stanley John McGRAY d/b/a Stan’s Gas, Debtor. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Stanley J. McGRAY d/b/a Stan’s Gas and Harvey Putterbaugh, Trustee, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 181-00161.

Adv. No. 182-0060.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine.

July 8, 1982.

*588Charles H. Veilleux, Skowhegan, Me., for debtor.

Harvey J. Putterbaugh, Portland, Me., trustee.

Robert E. Sutcliffe, Rudman & Winchell, Bangor, Me., for plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JAMES A. GOODMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiff, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, has filed a complaint for relief from the injunction imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2) in order to foreclose upon the debtor’s 1978 Dodge Ramcharger motor vehicle. Following a pre-trial conference, the parties stipulated to the following facts.

The plaintiff holds a valid, properly perfected security interest created in April, 1980 in the debtor’s motor vehicle. The debtor filed his petition in bankruptcy on May 21, 1981, and received his discharge on February 3, 1982. The parties did not reaffirm the debt, the debtor did not redeem the vehicle, and the plaintiff did not seek relief from the automatic stay prior to discharge. The trustee has abandoned the vehicle.

The sole issue before the court is whether or not the plaintiff’s security interest in personal property survives the debtor’s discharge. If so, the parties agree that the plaintiff is entitled to relief from the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2).

Legislative history makes it clear that Congress intended that valid liens should survive bankruptcy discharge. H.Rep.No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 361 (1977); S.Rep.No.95-989, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 76 (1978), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, p. 5787. The debtor argues that, while liens upon real estate may survive discharge, security interests in personal property do not. This Court disagrees. *See, e.g., In re Sawyer,*18 B.R. 661, 663, 8 B.C.D. 1168, 1169 (Bkrtcy.D.Idaho 1982); *In re Krahn,*10 B.R. 770, 771, 7 B.C.D. 767, 768, 4 C.B.C.2d 461, 462 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Wis.1981); *In re Bell,*8 B.R. 549, 550, 7 B.C.D. 219, 220, 4 C.B.C.2d 285, 286 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Mich.) *rev’d on other grounds*15 B.R. 859, 8 B.C.D. 127 (E.D.Mich.1981); *In re Williams,*7 B.R. 234, 239, 3 C.B.C.2d 409, 414 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Ga.1980). *But see In re Williams,*9 B.R. 228, 7 B.C.D. 388, 4 C.B.C.2d 95 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.1981). The plaintiff is granted relief from the discharge injunction to proceed upon its security interest in the debtor’s 1978 Dodge Ramcharger motor vehicle in accordance with state law.
##### 



Exhibit 10.30
 MICROMET, INC.
2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
 ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE
 1.1
 ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
 2.1
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (1)
 1.




---



##### 



(A)
 (B)
 (C)
  (2)
 (3)
 (A)
 2.




---



##### 



(B)
 (4)
  (f)
 (g)
 (h)
 (i)
 (j)
 (k)
 (l)
 (m)
 (n)
 (1)
 3.




---



##### 



(2)
 (3)
 (o)
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
 (4)
 (5)
 (6)
 4.




---



##### 



(p)
 (q)
 (r)
 (s)
 (t)
 (u)
 (v)
 (w) 5.
        (x)
 (y)
 (z)
 (aa)
 (bb)
 (cc)
 (dd)
 (ee)
 (ff)
 (gg)
 6.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
 3.1
 (a) **
 (b)
 (c)
 3.2
 3.3 **
 ARTICLE 4
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
 4.1
 (a)
 (b)
 
 **
    
    This plan was assumed in the merger with
CancerVax Corporation, and as a result of the exchange ratio in the merger, the
aggregate number of shares of Micromet, Inc. common stock available for
issuance under the plan became 1,922,971 shares. 7.




---



##### 



4.2
 ARTICLE 5
STOCK OPTIONS
 5.1
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 8.




---



##### 



(d)
 5.2
 (a)
 (b)
 (1)
 (2)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 9.




---



##### 



(g)
 ARTICLE 6
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
 6.1
 6.2
 6.3
 6.4
 ARTICLE 7
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
 7.1
 10.




---



##### 



7.2
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 7.3
 (a)
 (b)
 7.4
 (a)
 (b)
 11.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 8
 OTHER TYPES OF AWARDS
 8.1
 8.2
 (a)
 (b)
 8.3
 8.4
 8.5
 8.6
 12.




---



##### 



8.7
 8.8
 8.9
 ARTICLE 9
PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
 9.1
 9.2
 9.3
 13.




---



##### 



9.4
 9.5
 ARTICLE 10
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS
 10.1
 10.2
 14.




---



##### 



10.3
 10.4
 10.5
 15.




---



##### 



ARTICLE 11
CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE
 11.1
 11.2
 11.3
 16.




---



##### 



11.4
 11.5
 11.6
 ARTICLE 12
ADMINISTRATION
 12.1
 17.




---



##### 



12.2
 12.3
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e) 18.
        (f)
 (g)
 (h)
 (i)
 (j)
 12.4
 ARTICLE 13
EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATE
 13.1
 13.2
 ARTICLE 14
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION
 14.1
 19.




---



##### 



14.2
 ARTICLE 15
 GENERAL PROVISIONS
 15.1
 15.2
 15.3
 15.4
 15.5
 20.




---



##### 



15.6
 15.7
 15.8
 15.9
 15.10
 15.11
 15.12
 21.




---



##### 



15.13
 15.14
 22.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pamela Maye, Also Known as Donna Esterine, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 726]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered February 25, 1994, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sole contention raised by the defendant on appeal is that the trial court improperly accepted the prosecutor’s reasons for exercising peremptory challenges against four prospective black jurors. The reasons proffered by the prosecutor for excusing those four prospective jurors were race-neutral on their face, specific, and trial-related. The defendant did not challenge those reasons as pretextual in the trial court. Therefore, the question of whether the trial court properly credited the prosecutor’s reasons is not before us *(see, People v Allen,*86 NY2d 101).

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Gibbons

2

SUPREME COURT

OF
NEVADA

(0) 1947A this case is responsible for the error at his first trial and instead faults the

system that allows for jurors to ask questions, but submits that because the problem is caused by a procedure it should be attributed to the prosecutor. We find this argument unpersuasive, and conclude that double jeopardy is not implicated because Sangster consented to the mistrial and the error was not caused by the State.

Second, Sangster argues that the district court erred by instructing the jury that he was innocent "until" proven guilty as opposed to innocent "unless" proven guilty. Sangster asserts that using the word "until" implies that the jury should inevitably find him guilty, nullifying the presumption of innocence. However, the instruction also stated that the State had a burden of proving the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and that Sangster was entitled to a verdict of not guilty if the jury had a reasonable doubt as to his guilt. Other instructions also emphasized the State's burden. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by giving the instruction. See Blake v. State, 121 Nev. 779, 799, 121 P.3d 567, 580 (2005) (instruction stating that the defendant was innocent until proven guilty plainly implied that guilt might not be proven).

Having considered Sangster's contentions and concluded that they are without merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF
NEVADA

(0) 1947A 3