alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1424 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1424

 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2017

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Ms. Moore, Mr. Grothman, and Mr. Kind) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 
 National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Scenic Trails Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third and fourth sentences and 
inserting ``The trail shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as a unit of the National Park System.''.

SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting ``as a unit 
of the National Park System,'' after ``administer the trail''.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0600 -- Incorporation by 

Reference of Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0008 and EPA-HQ-OAR2002-0010, and Legacy Dockets A-88-02 and A-95-43 

DATE: September 13, 2010 

FROM: Mary Kissell, EPA/OAQPS 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0600 

The following dockets are incorporated by reference into Docket EPAHQ-OAR-2010-0600 (docket for National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Hard and Decorative Chromium 

Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; Group I Polymers and 

Resins; Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals 

Production; The Printing and Publishing Industry; and Steel Pickling--

HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants). 

Docket Number Rules Associated with Docket 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0008 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutant Emissions: Group I Polymers and 

Resins (Epichlorohydrin Elastomers Production, 

HypalonTM Production, Nitrile Butadiene Rubber 

Production, Polybutadiene Rubber Production, 

and Styrene Butadiene Rubber and Latex 

Production); Marine Vessel Loading Operations; 

Mineral Wool Production; Pharmaceuticals 

Production; and Printing and Publishing Industry 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0010 

National Emission Standards for Chromium 

Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium 

Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks 

A-88-02 

National Emission Standards for Chromium 

Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium 

Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks 

A-95-43 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Steel 

Pickling—HCl Process Facilities and 

Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 443 HEALTH §

SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, §

ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL §

CONSTRUCTION PENSION PLAN, §

ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL §

CONSTRUCTION WORKERS §

SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION §

PLAN (2014 RESTATEMENT) and §

RETIREMENT MEDICAL §

FUNDING PLAN FOR THE ST. §

PAUL ELECTRICAL WORKERS, §

§ No. 5, 2024

P laintiffs Below, §

Appellant s

, § Court Below

— Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 2019

- 0816

CENCORA, INC. (f/k/a §

AmerisourceBergen Corporation), §

§

Nominal Defendant B elow §

Appellee, §

§

v. §

DENNIS M. NALLY, as the Special §

Litigation Committee of the Board of §

Directors of Cencora, Inc., (f/k/a §

AmerisourceBergen Corporation), §

§

Interested Party B elow, §

Appellee. §

Argued : September 11, 2024

Decided: September 20 , 2024

Before SEITZ

, Chief Justice; VA LIHURA

, TRAYNOR

, LeGROW , and

GRIFFITHS

, Justices , constituting the Court en B anc.2 ORDER

This 20 th day of September , 2024 , after consideration of the parties’ briefs , the

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its November 17, 2023 Memorandum Opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chan c ery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
From: "Backfisch Don (NORALNM)" <BackfisD@noralnm.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Kisner Jeff (NORALNM)" <KisnerJ@noralnm.com>

Date: 02/01/2011 03:52 PM

Subject: FW: Noranda New Madrid, MO Emission Point Coordinates

I added some of the emission points that were left blank on the spreadsheet you provided and I 

believe that everything has been matched. The only exceptions are the emission units with the 

ID of 14750. I don’t know what these units are, but they may be building ventilation fans that 

aren’t associated with any process. I have been working on matching the ID’s with the 

spreadsheets you had sent earlier as well. I have attached the spreadsheets that I updated with 

the corresponding ID’s.

Don Backfisch

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:04 PM

To: Backfisch Don (NORALNM); Skoda, Charles (NORALINC); Kisner Jeff (NORALNM)

Subject: Fw: Noranda New Madrid, MO Emission Point Coordinates

The attached spreadsheet will contain the Id Nos. for the emission points we were able to match. Hope 

this helps.

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
No. 82-991.

#### National Association of Home Health Agencies et al. *v.*Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1428 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 

law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. HURD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to authorize COPS grantees to use grant 

funds to hire veterans as career law enforcement officers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Law En5 forcement Heroes Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with Bills
2 

•HR 1428 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VET2 ERANS. 

3 Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

4 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

5 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including by 

6 prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as defined 

7 in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)’’ after ‘‘Na8 tion’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with Bills
#### Raabe, Respondent, vs. Brzoskowski, Appellant.

*March 9*

April *7, 1931.*

*D. J. Regan*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

*Harry V. Meissner*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The facts involved in this case are the same as those involved in the case of *Raabe v. Brzoskowski (ante,*p. 319, 236 N. W. 133), and for the reasons there stated the mandate is the same.

*By the*Court.-r-Judgment affirmed.
H. R. 1417 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to allow the Museum to 

acquire, receive, possess, collect, ship, transport, import, and display firearms, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Law Enforcement 

Museum Exhibits Act’’. 

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM TO 

ACQUIRE, RECEIVE, POSSESS, COLLECT, SHIP, TRANSPORT, 

IMPORT, AND DISPLAY FIREARMS. 

The National Law Enforcement Museum Act (Public Law 106– 

492) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘SEC. 5. AUTHORITY OF MUSEUM TO ACQUIRE, RECEIVE, POSSESS, 

COLLECT, SHIP, TRANSPORT, IMPORT, AND DISPLAY FIREARMS. 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, or any law or any rule or regulations of a State or 

any political subdivision thereof, the Museum may acquire, receive, 

possess, collect, ship, transport, import, and display firearms (as 

defined in section 921(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, or 

section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) in fulfilling 

the purposes of the Museum. 

‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF STATE.—In subsection (a), the term ‘State’ 

means the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, 

the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of 

the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the possessions of the United States.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6779

GEORGE GOINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK

JACKSON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-1119)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate

judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge’s* order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the magistrate judge. Goins v. Attorney General of North Carolina,

No. CA-97-1119 (M.D.N.C. May 18, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 751 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-440, K2025-437.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27908 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Mark E. McMillan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insignia Solutionsplc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238.];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004                                           /s/ MARK E. MCMILLAN   Mark E. McMillan   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S44]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
        Begich, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
        Bingaman, Mr. Casey, Mr. Lautenberg, Ms. Stabenow, Mrs. 
        McCaskill, Ms. Klobuchar, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Schumer, and Ms. 
        Mikulski):
  S. 3. A bill to to protect homeowners and consumers by reducing 
foreclosures, ensuring the availability of credit for homeowners, 
businesses, and consumers, and reforming the financial regulatory 
system, and for other purposes; read the first time.
  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the 
bill be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                  S. 3

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowner Protection and 
     Wall Street Accountability Act of 2009''.

     SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

       It is the sense of Congress that Congress should enact, and 
     the President should sign, legislation--
       (1) to stabilize the housing market and assist homeowners 
     by imposing a temporary moratorium on foreclosures, removing 
     impediments to the modification of distressed mortgages, 
     creating tax and other incentives to help prevent 
     foreclosures and encourage refinancing into affordable and 
     sustainable mortgage solutions, and pursuing other 
     foreclosure-prevention policies through the Troubled Asset 
     Relief Program or other programs;
       (2) to ensure the safety and soundness of the United States 
     financial system for investors by reforming the financial-
     regulatory system, strengthening systemic-risk regulation, 
     enhancing market transparency, and increasing consumer 
     protections in financial regulation to prevent predatory 
     lending practices;
       (3) to ensure credit-card accountability, responsibility 
     and disclosure; and
       (4) to stabilize credit markets for small-business lenders 
     to enhance their ability to make loans to small firms, and 
     stimulate the small-business loan markets by temporarily 
     streamlining and investing in the loan programs of the Small 
     Business Administration.
                                 ______
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# From the Tundra to the Tropics, F-35As Make Their Debut in Cope North 21

By Senior Airman Jonathan Valdes Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2007-27223

Directorate Identifier: 2006NM224AD

767-56A0010, R2 --- 6/18/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### William Filgo *v.*William Penny.

From Johnston.

A. having by mistake paid to B. a fifty dollar banlc note, for a five dollar bank note, cannot maintain *assumpsit*to recover back forty-five dollars. A bank note is not money, and a delivery by mistake of any tiling except money, does not pass the property in the thing delivered, and cannot raise an implied promise to pay money.

This case commenced by a warrant before a Justice of the Peace, in which the Plaintiff claimed the sum of forty-five dollars, “ a balance due to him on exchange of some bank notes.” The Plaintiff declared upon a special agreement, and for money liad and received, for money paid to the Defendant by mistake, &c. There was no evidence of any special agreement, and the only evidence to maintain the other counts was, that the Plaintiff had, by mistake, paid to the Defendant, a fifty *183dollar bank note, for a five dollar bank note. No promise, either express or implied, was proved, unless the payment of the bank note as aforesaid, implied a promise to pay money. The Defendant relied upon the plea of <£ non-assumpsit.” The Jury found a verdict for the Plaintiff, under the charge of the Court; and a rule for a new trial being obtained,, the same was sent to this Court.

Harris, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The case states, that there was no evidence of a special agreement, and the only evidence to support the money counts was, that the Plaintiff had, by mistake, paid to the Defendant a fifty dollar bank note for a five dollar bank note. A bank note is not money, and does not differ in its nature from any other promissory note payable to bearer. A delivery by mistake of any thing, except money, does not pass the property in the thing delivered, and cannot raise an implied promise to pay-money. Let the rule for a new trial be made absolute.