alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,119,782
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      991,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                       142,603
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,796,422
<PP&E>                                          19,640,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,814,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,305,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,257,266
<BONDS>                                          4,585,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           160,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,386,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,305,280
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,957,463
<CGS>                                              955,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,457,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   201,382
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,455,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,405,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,405,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        10960764
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5118522
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   79438248
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         8209455
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           8214943
<LOANS>                                      603851914
<ALLOWANCE>                                    4807054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               737450196
<DEPOSITS>                                   579463556
<SHORT-TERM>                                  48221000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            8258417
<LONG-TERM>                                    2000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       8658991
<OTHER-SE>                                    85919807
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               737450196
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               24118723
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3348728
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              27467451
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            14092566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            15627781
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         11839670
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   140000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               38847
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                6870028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6234657
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6234657
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4143792
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                       2622
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1146666
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               4757152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    40629
<RECOVERIES>                                       531
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4807054
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1210000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        3597054


</TABLE>
#### In re QUEEN CITY GRAIN, INC., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 1-82-01273.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

Dec. 13, 1982.

Jeffrey Marks, Steve Williams, William H. Eder, Jr., Charles M. Meyer, Cincinnati, Ohio, for debtor.

BURTON PERLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before this case was filed, debtor was represented by Charles M. Meyer, Esq. a member of the firm of Santen, Santen and Hughes, Co. L.P.A. William H. Eder, Jr., Esq. was elected trustee for the debtor. The trustee earlier in this case filed an application to require that debtor’s counsel turn over to the trustee his legal files. We granted the relief sought with respect to pre-filing documents.

The present application seeks relief directed at Mr. Meyer which goes a step further. That is, here the trustee seeks an order prohibiting Meyer from discussing the contents of those files with any person without the consent of the trustee. The concern of the trustee arises because the files in question include information concerning various transactions between debt- or and another entity which information might be used adversely to the interest of the trustee. Trustee says that Meyer is also counsel to such adverse interests.

At the time that the present application was filed we granted a temporary order restraining Meyer from discussing or disclosing the contents of his legal files until our final determination upon this application. In such order we stated the following:

> “At the hearing, we will expect the record to reveal with specificity the pertinent facts. Among these will be the identity of the parties represented by counsel; the dates of representation, and whether still continuing; the relationship of any individuals involved and their relationships to any involved corporation, as well as the dates of such relationship. The foregoing is not meant to be an exclusive itemization of facts which ought to be in the record.”

The matter came on for hearing. Notwithstanding the above quoted express admonition, trustee presented no testimony or other evidence v/hatever to support his position. Mr. Meyer was also present and made a professional statement that he represented and continued to represent the debtor. At the conclusion of the hearing we reserved decision.

Trustee asks us on this application to infer, notwithstanding Mr. Meyer’s statement, that Meyer does not represent the debtor corporation, but in fact is representing the individuals who control or are influential in the affairs of the debtor. We decline to make this inference in the absence of a factual record. The record before us, then, contains only Mr. Meyer’s statement that he represents the debtor.

Since the trustee is the one seeking relief, he has the burden of establishing his en*538titlement to the relief sought. He has failed to carry that burden since, so far as this record is concerned, Mr. Meyer is the attorney for debtor. There is no reason presented to us why he should not be able to engage in the normal intercourse between an attorney and the individuals active in his corporate client.

Trustee’s motion is denied. The stay contained in our Order entered October 13, 1982 is vacated.

SO ORDERED.
#### In the Matter of Charles Hili, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin, III, as Commissioner of Correctional Services of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 87]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting threats, impersonation, smuggling and lying as the result of an incident in which he sent a letter, signed by another inmate, to the local Social Security Administration office requesting information regarding the whereabouts of his estranged wife. At the hearing, there was testimony that petitioner previously had threatened to kill his estranged wife. This testimony, coupled with the testimony of the inmate who signed the letter, provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt. Finally, we have considered petitioner’s due process claim and find it to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Readiness in Korea Important to Diplomacy, Nominee Tells Senate Panel

DoD News, Defense Media

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
‘.ea

Hardesty 

724 07% 

J. 

Douglas 

J. 

J. 

August 12, 2014, or was mistakenly filed in this court rather than the 

district court such that the notice would be considered filed in the district 

court on the date that it was received in this court as provided in NRAP 

4(e); rather, a courtesy copy of the August 12, 2014, notice of appeal was 

sent to this court. Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we 

lack jurisdiction and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge 

Law Office of Lisa Rasmussen 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Walter Kaneeki Clark 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 44711D14)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E90]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    RECOGNIZING THE SERVICES OF JOHN DE LORENZO, COMMUNITY SERVICES 
            DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF FAIRFIELD IN CALIFORNIA

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. ELLEN O. TAUSCHER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, January 14, 2009

  Mrs. TAUSCHER. Madam Speaker, I rise to recognize John De Lorenzo as 
he retires after 18 years of public service with the city of Fairfield.
  Mr. De Lorenzo's career with Fairfield began when he was hired as the 
city's community services director in 1990. During his tenure, the 
Community Services Department was recognized with many State-wide, 
regional and national awards including two Helen Putnam Awards of 
Excellence from the League of California Cities.
  In addition to his outstanding service in Fairfield, Mr. De Lorenzo 
has also served as both the president and the administrators' 
representative of the California Park and Recreation Society, District 
1, and was a member of the Annual Conference Planning Committee for the 
California Park and Recreation Society. He has also served as a member 
of the League of California Cities Administrative Services Policy 
Committee, and also was a member of the Annual League Conference 
Planning Committee.
  The honors and awards Mr. De Lorenzo helped bring the Fairfield 
Community Services Department and his involvement with the numerous 
committees he has served on over the years are a testament to his hard 
work and dedication to local concerns.
  As John De Lorenzo retires from his position as the director of the 
Fairfield Community Services Department, I would like to thank him for 
his leadership and dedication to improving the quality of life for the 
residents of the city of Fairfield. I wish him the best of luck in his 
future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
 
                 PHARMACOPEIA, INC. 1994 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN

                                Amendment No. 3
                                ---------------

     Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 14 of the Pharmacopeia, 
Inc. 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), the Board of Directors 
of Pharmacopeia, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows:

     1.   The first sentence of Section 3(a) is hereby amended and restated to 
          read as follows:

          "Subject to the provisions of Section 12 of the Plan, the maximum
          aggregate number of shares under the Plan is 1,750,000 shares of
          Common Stock. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or
          reacquired Common Stock."

     2.   This Amendment No. 3 to the Plan shall be effective only after 
approval of a majority of the Company's stockholders as set forth in Section 14.

     To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 3, the Company has caused its 
authorized officers to affix its corporation name and seal this 9th day of May, 
1997.


CORPORATE SEAL                               PHARMACOPEIA, INC.



Attest: /s/ LEWIS J. SHUSTER                 By: /s/ JOSEPH A. MOLLICA
       ---------------------                    ----------------------
       Lewis J. Shuster,                        Joseph A. Mollica,
       Secretary                                Chairman, President, and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Galarza, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 519]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel Sullivan, J.), rendered August 19, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 121/2 to 25 years, 5 to 15 years, and 21/3 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied without a hearing. Defendant was afforded reasonable opportunity to present his contentions via his *pro se*application, his letter to the court, and the additional application for the same relief submitted by his attorney. The minutes of the plea proceeding establish that the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, belying defendant’s unsupported claims, *inter alia,*of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Jackson,*186 AD2d 389, *lv denied*81 NY2d 790; *People v Rivera,*191 AD2d 209, *lv denied*81 NY2d 975). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 8, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00234

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.J.Z., CHILDREN

,

From the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01562 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Notification of Late Clerk's Record is hereby NOTED. The clerk's record is deemed filed.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
|Exhibit 32


ACCELRYS, INC.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the Company) and I, John J. Hanlon,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
                    2004, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/Mark J. Emkjer
Mark J. EmkjerPresident and Chief Executive Officer


/s/John J. Hanlon
John J. HanlonExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer


August 6, 2004


A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


30
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40420

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

EDWARD D. GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 5:02-CR-693-ALL

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Garcia appeals his sentence, arguing thatit exceeds the statutory

maximum because itincludes a three-year term of supervised release in addition

to a two-year term of imprisonment. The government concedes error. The parUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-40420

2

ties request thatthis court modify the judgment by vacating the additional term

of supervised release and otherwise affirm the sentence.

A district court may revoke a term of supervised release and require a defendant to return to prison. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Where the offense that results in the term of supervised release is a class D felony, as was Garcia’s 2002

drug offense, the defendant may not be required to serve more than two years

in prison. Id.; see 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D).

Under the provision of § 3583(h), as that section provided at the time of

Garcia’s drug offense in 2002, the district court was also permitted to impose a

term of supervised release to be served after imprisonment, but only where the

term of imprisonment was less than the maximum term of imprisonment authorized under § 3583(e)(3). Although § 3583(h) has since been amended; the amendment will not be applied retroactively absent a plain statement that Congress

so intended. See Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 702-03 (2000).

The parties correctly argue that, because Garcia was sentenced to the

maximum term of imprisonment under § 3583(e)(3), the district court was prohibited under the applicable version of § 3583(h) from imposing a subsequent

term of supervised release. Accordingly, we MODIFY the judgment by

VACATING the three-year term of supervised release, and we AFFIRM the

judgment AS MODIFIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1073 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1073

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish a structure for 
visitor services on the Arlington Ridge tract, in the area of the U.S. 
           Marine Corps War Memorial, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2017

  Mr. Beyer (for himself and Mr. Cook) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish a structure for 
visitor services on the Arlington Ridge tract, in the area of the U.S. 
           Marine Corps War Memorial, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``Arlington Ridge tract'' means the parcel of 
Federal land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as the Nevius 
Tract and transferred to the Department of the Interior in 1953, that 
is bounded generally by--
            (1) Arlington Boulevard (United States Route 50) to the 
        north;
            (2) Jefferson Davis Highway (Virginia Route 110) to the 
        east;
            (3) Marshall Drive to the south; and
            (4) North Meade Street to the west.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF A VISITOR SERVICES FACILITY ON THE ARLINGTON 
              RIDGE TRACT.

    Notwithstanding section 2863(g) of Public Law 107-107, the 
Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct a structure for 
visitor services to include a public restroom facility on the Arlington 
Ridge tract in the area of the U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial.
                                 <all>
```