alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Keith Gerrard of Resin Systems Inc., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Resin Systems Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this annual report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: | February 27, 2004                             
|----- | ----------------------------------------------
|By:   | /s/ Keith Gerrard                             
|      | Name: Keith Gerrard                           
|      | Title:Controller (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.4

 

ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.
 New York, New York
 January 10, 2011

 

The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010 and December 17, 2010 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Arnold Schumsky (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $50,000 and to which this Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:

 

1.             The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “January 24, 2011.”

 

2.             Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

	
 
  	
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
  
	
 
  	
 
  	
 
  
	
 
  	
By
  	
/s/ Richard E. Forkey
  
	
 
  	
 
  	
 
  
	
 
  	
 
  	
Name: Richard E. Forkey
  
	
 
  	
 
  	
Title: Chief Executive Officer
  


 

	
Accepted:
  	
 
  
	
 
  	
 
  
	
/s/ Arnold Schumsky
  	
 
  
	
 
  	
 
  
	
Arnold Schumsky
No. 90-710.

#### St. Paul Fire *&*Marine Insurance Co. *v.*Superior Court of California for the City and County of San Francisco (Jones et al., Real Parties in Interest).

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

2009EA700446 

CPlOEA0006 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

'-

:::: 

-F. 

.- l 

:!5 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b),that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows: 

Jeanine Gotimer 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718553-3272 

Facsimile: 718995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Ir. 

Regional Counsel 

By: ~e~2timer 

Attorney 

Dated: t! 'r" ( 11 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

u.s. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

David Harrison, President 

Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

106 Wells Cove Road 

POBox98 

Grasonville, MD 21638 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Date: ! . 5 -/ / , 7n4W~~ Marianna Perero 

e~ 

Paralegal Specialist 

F ederal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 127

 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to urbanized area 
                formula grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

Mr. Al Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to urbanized area 
                formula grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation for Heroes Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. URBANIZED AREA FORMULA GRANTS.

    Section 5307(c)(1)(D) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (iii) by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon at the end; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) veteran (as such term is defined in 
                        section 101 of title 38);''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41159 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
BALDEMAR SAMBRANO VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(No. 91-CR-4) August 7, 2002 Before JOLLY, DAVIS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Court’s August 1, 2002 opinion dismissing for lack of jurisdiction is hereby WITHDRAWN. The clerk of court is instructed to REASSIGN Defendant-Appellant’s appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to unseal certain records. OPINION WITHDRAWN; CASE REASSIGNED.
WILLIAM C. BOND, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.,

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action 10-1617 (RCL)

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated by the Court in its memorandum docketed this same day, it is

hereby 

ORDERED that Bond’s motions to strike [Dkt. ##13, 25] are DENIED, 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that defendants’ motions to dismiss [Dkt. ##10, 24] are

GRANTED, and it is further 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Bond’s motion for leave to file a second amended

complaint [Dkt. #26], is DENIED. 

This case now stands DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This is a final and appealable

order. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).

Signed on December 6, 2011 by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-10907

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

DONTE GLOSTER, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

WARDEN FDC MIAMI, 

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 9:21-cv-82053-DMM

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-10907 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/28/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10907

Before GRANT, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Federal prisoner Donte Gloster appeals the district court’s 

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. 

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the factual and procedural 

background, the issues raised on appeal, and the applicable law. 

Gloster argues that the Bureau of Prisons was required to credit 

time he spent in prison as part of his sentence for drug and firearm 

offenses toward the new term of imprisonment he received on revocation of supervised release. We conclude that for purposes of 

calculating credit for prior custody under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), the 

“offense” for which Gloster’s 30-month revocation sentence was 

imposed was his violation of the conditions of his supervised release, not the drug and firearm crimes for which his original 262-

month term of imprisonment (later reduced to 188 months) was 

imposed. We therefore affirm.

 AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 22-10907 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 12/28/2022 Page: 2 of 2
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices1996

# Change Notice 96-022

IM001

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL PIPB

ASME Sec III & XI ASME Sec III & XI

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents issued with this change notice.

REMARKS: 

**IMC 1301** (Response to Radioactive Material Incidents That Do Not Require Activation of the NRC Incident Response Plan) is revised to include additional guidance for situations involving intakes of radioactive materials. The revision is prompted by experience gained from investigation of incidents at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) involving ingestion of radioactive phosphorus (P-32). An additional criterion, based on the magnitude of the intake, for immediate dispatch of one or more regional inspectors for follow-up, was also added.

**IMC 2605** (Decommissioning Procedures For Fuel Cycle and Materials Licensees) is issued to establish policies and procedures for decommissioning fuel cycle and materials licensees.

**9900 Technical Guidance** (ASME Sections III & XI) has been revised to reflect minor editorial changes.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, July 02, 2015
## CYCLONIC FLOW DATA

SAMPLE LOCATION: 0~\.\ \ 

### 8~c' UNIT NO.: ~

# 'L TEST NO: ('~

## Yc:.L£::>~~ C

## ,'P-~ CL~LI.~ SARO. PRESS. (in.Hg):_-z:_q_-_"5_~

_ ASS. STATIC PRESS. INSTACK (in.H20): PS DATE: 

### 'is1"'-;;>::7?I.-z:a..~

### -= DATA TAK~~~' -,.-\ 

## -~-""'\'Q..,-,---- ~ \~ TEST OESCRIPTION:

_ PITOT TUSE COEFFICIENT:

_ PITOT 10:

_ Vs= 2.90 Cp -VtlPTs -V29.92 X 28.95 Ps MW 

# A.16 £. 

# c
~ 

# V- I 

# .- 

# s 5' 'V 

# q L-j 

### 2-, t-I '-:J- "'6 

# b ;3 <b, '2._ I I 

# 5 2 

# + I 

# 1 1 Lf ( 

## '-f

-. 

### Q:, I 

### ~ {~ 

# 0 -6

{"2- 

### ,-- 

## cr 

# 'D <g to> '-{ 

# ;3 ~. 

# .- 'b 

# 3 ~3 

# 3 b z. 0., 

## z. 

# -3 

# I I I 

# G f 

## I
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The First Marine Division Returns to Australia, as Blue Diamond 6 Visits MRF-D

By Capt. Joseph DiPietro Marine Rotational Force - Darwin

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.



|               |  |  |  |                     |  |                                                                                 |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|August 9, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Graham V. Smith
|               |  |  |  |                     |  | Graham V. Smith Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equ ipment Costs:

Tanks

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of purchased equipment cost equations for tanks by

documenting EPA's communication with a vendor regarding purchas e costs and information for tanks used in

the Steam Electric cost model.Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam

/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 06/28/2011 Time: 7:30 am PDT

Company Name: Bendel Tank & Heat Exchanger Corporation Contact Name: Vince Petrucci

Phone No : (704)-596-5112

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for carbon steel sho p-built tanks for a chemical precipitation wastewater treat ment system.



## TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 28, 2011 at 7:30 am I contacted Mr. Vince Petrucci. I explained to Mr. Petrucci that we are working

on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to treat FGD (flue gas

desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part of this project we are trying to

collect cost information on different components or unit s of a chemical precipitation system.

I told Mr. Petrucci that we are interested in shop-built carbon steel tanks. I requested information such as

purchase cost, cost for ancillary equipments and power consumption (if applicable). Mr. Petrucci stated that th e

maximum tank size they offer is approximately 70,000 gallons, w hich corresponds to a tank diameter of 15 feet

and height of 60 feet. Mr. Petrucci indicated that he wo uld provide cost information via email.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 467 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2025-431, K2025-428.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27893 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 1387, Misc.

*Edward O. Spotts*for. petitioner. *Charles E. Pledger, Jr.*and *Justin L. Edgerton*for respondent.

#### Zilka *v.*Sanctis Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      13.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Prana Biotechnology Limited (the “Company”)
      on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoffrey P.
      Kempler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.






/s/
      Geoffrey P.
      Kempler *


Geoffrey
      P. Kempler


Chief
      Executive Officer




September
      29, 2006




*  The
      originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
      Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
Exhibit
      23.1




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
      333-136355 and 333-122609 on Form S-8 of Emtec, Inc. of our report dated
      November 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
      Emtec, Inc. for year ended August 31, 2008, included in this Annual Report
      (Form
      10-K) for the year ended August 31, 2008.





/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Blue
      Bell, Pennsylvania


November
      26, 2008
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
ALW IN C ARPENTER , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC , De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-17585 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-01495-PM PGW F
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Philip M . Pro, Se nior Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d an d Subm i tte d De c e m be r 9, 2015 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : KOZINSKI, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc u it Judge s. The distric t c ourt a

b use d its disc re tion by awarding Ale ssi & Koe nig, LLC (“ Ale ssi” ) $5,843.75 in a

ttorne y ’ s fe e s. 1. Ale ssi c o nstitute s a

la w firm re t a ine d by

its c lie nts to c olle c t de b ts in the
usua l c ourse of its pra c tic e . Se e Ne v. R e v. Stat. § 649.020(2)(g). As such , it is 

# FIL ED D EC 14 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.e xe m

pte d from the re quire m e nt tha

t it obta in a

lic e nse from

the State of Ne va da be fore c olle c ting c la im s on be ha lf of its c lie n ts. Id. § 649.075; se e also Ne v . De p’ t of B us. & Indus., Fin. Insts. Div., Advisory Opinion Re ga

rding Attorne y s Ac ting
a s C olle c tion Age n c ie s (2012). 1 2. Howe ve r, give n the am biguity of the “ c onduc ting c olle c tion a ge nc ie s” la ngua ge in § 649.020(2) a

nd tha t c l arify ing guida

n c e from the State wa s not
a va ila ble until se ve ra l m onths a fte r C arpe n te r file d suit a ga inst Ale ssi, C arpe nte r’ s c la im wa s not brought “

without re a sona

ble ground.” Ne v. R e v. Stat. § 18.010(2)(b). 3. Additional l y , the distric t c ourt’ s orde r a warding fe e s to Ale ssi did not
c onta in the m andate d “ find[ings] ” ne c e ssa ry to support its de c ision. Id. ; se e also Riv e ro v . Riv e ro , 216 P.3d 213, 234 (Nev . 2009). RE V E RSE D.

1 Av ailable at

http://fid.sta

te .nv.us/Advisory Opinion/2012/2012-03-22_ OPINION_Attorne yAc tingAsC olle c t ionAge nc y .pdf.
No. 82-872.

#### Legner *v.*Union Pacific Railroad Co.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.