02/03/201 1 17:2 4 FA X202493514 2 FA A * DM S 0001/04 2

50001/004 2

Michae l Selig . MD . FACC , CFI- H 281 6 0refi©l d Roa d Allentown . PA . 1810 4 

## ' cPARTMEN TO F :'IASPORTATIO N - > ! OPERATION S ••01 ! FES- u A9:0 0 U.S . DEPARTMFN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O P HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Adminisfrotlo n Cynthi a Dominik , Lour o Panto , Latony o William s Complainant s M & R Heticopters , LLC . Responden t Honorobl e Judg e Ronni e Yodo t P«dora i Dockel . No : 2010-1?1 1

RESPONPgNr S REPL

YT O ^AOT^Q N TO DISM(S S TRUTHS O F ADMISSION S AN D NOW . come s respondent , MICHAE LB , SELIG . MD , FACC , CFI-H , principl e to rM & R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ] (non-operationa l ,^inc e 2007 ) vvho m aver s an d file s th e followin g Repl yt o Complainant s Responsf tt o th e Motio n t o Dismis s -Truth s o fAdmi-LSion , 1 . Complainant s alleg e tha tthe yhov e responde d t o a vas tmajorit yo f Respondent s allegations , 2 . Responden t allege s tha tcomplainant s hav e responde d t o wha tIs convenien t fo rIhe m 1 o annv^rer , bu thav e no tresponde d t o man yitem s tha t ma ysho wth e complainant s i n ba d ligh to rsho wmalfeasance . 1 -r* A+ DM S 01002/04 2 02/03/201 1 n:2 4 FA X_202493514 2 FA A^^^^^^^^^ ^

3 . Complainant s clai m the ydi d no tfil e a lat e respons e t o Respondent s Motio n fo r-Judamen ft o Dism'S' ! -Failur e t o Respon d o rMee tFilin g Deadlines . Thi s documen t wa s sen t T o complainonl s o n Decembe r6 , 2010 , Acombine d respons e include d wit h a rcspon.i e t o Respondent s Motio n to rJudgmen tl o Dismis s 4 . wa s receive d b ycertifie d mal l o n Decembe r23 , 2010,1 5 day s late . 5 . Responden t aore« s complainan tdi d fil e a respons e t o Respondent s Motio n fo rJudamen t t o Dismi.ss - Follur e t o properl yrespon d o rmee tfilin g deadline s o n th e deadlin e dot e o fJanuar y3 , 2010 . 6 . Th e Respondent s Motio n t o Quash , Strik e o rDismis s Comploint , wit h associate d brie fwa s faxe d l o M s Panto s departmen to n Novembe r29 , 2010 , sen t b ymai l o n Novembe r30 , 2010 . Th e du e dat e wa s Decembe r9 , 2010 . A n objectio n o rrespons e wo s no treceive d o rserve a unti l Decembe r13 , 2010 , exceedin g Th e tim e allolte d unde r§ Rul e I3.2l8(d ] (Exhibit s previousl y presente d i n th e Respondent s Repl yt o Complainant s Respons e t o Judgmen tt o Dismiss , Faxe d 1-18-11) . 7 . O n Novembe r30 , 2010 , respondent s Motio n t o .Strike Allegatio n wa s faxe d an d sen t t o M s Ponte s departmen tt o whic h n o objectio n o ranswe rwa s receive d wiThi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e pursuan tt o § Rul e 13.218(d) . Alat e answe r wa s ols o provide d i n th ^ collaborativ e correspondenc e receive d o n Decembe r 13,2010 . 6 . M S Poni o faile d t o presen tan yrequeste d evidenc e c s t o wha n th e^ nM ^ 01003/04 2 02/03/201 1 I.V.^IFA XJ02493514 2 FA A^goOoS/ooas

respons e wa s octuall yreceive d i n he rrespons e t o thi s matter . Th e subiectiv e draf t dat e indicate d o n th e documen titsel fdoe s no trepresen ta n actua l dat e o fservic e an d a signe d authorizatio n o freceipt . 8 . M s Domin)l < fro m th e FA Aenforcemen tdivisio n o fth e chie fcounse l calle d respondent;persona l cel l ohon e admittin g tha i th e complainant s coul d no t fil e response s v>/ithi n th e 1 0 da ydeadlin e period , woul d b e i n breoc h o fIhi. i regulntion , t o wj t sh e requeste d responden tnran tcomploinqnt s a continuance . 9 . Arevie wo fth e EI R als o show s inconsistencie s regordin g th e dol e o n th e documents , a s wel l a s th e dat e o fdocumen twa s actuall yreceived . Exhibi t on e show s a lette rdraf t dat e o fAugus t14 , 200 9 an d a Certifie d mai l retur n receip t requeste d confirmatio n day s S day s loter . Notwithstanding , thi s warrant s stric t proo fo fth e repeatedl yrequeste d signe d certifie d retur n mai l receipt s validatin g bot h signatur e an d actua l serve d dates , instea d o fhearsay . 10 . Complainant s reference d |i3.2n(d)-Dat e o fService . Ther e ar e severo l method s listed . B

ydefinition , sinc e th e complainan tselecte d signator ydeliver y confirmation , b ymeon s o fsigne d retur n receipt , thi s represent s th e mos t accepted , reliabl e an d mos tobjectiv e dat e o fservice . Complainant s wen tt o extr a taxpayer s expens e a ttripl e th e cos tt o clearl yvalidat e an d ensur e th e tru e deliver ydate , thi s supersede s othe rsubjectiv e method s Tha trelie s o n hearsny . Base d o n th e abov e discrepancies , th e state d date s o n th e document s b yth e complainant s canno t b e truste d an d th e requeste d strictproo fb e provided ,* DM S 0004/04 2 02/03/201 1 1T:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA A^000^/00. 2



### 11 . Concernin g th e possibl e "misplaced " 2 yea rstatu e o flimitations , a simila rcas e .scenari o appears . Dat e o fdraf t document s vs . confirme d date s o f service . Complainant s ave rth e allege d violatio n just squeake d in , b yThe ski n o n thei rteet h b ya credible ? ON E DA Yan d therefor e valid . Th e requeste d proo fo f th e objectiv e dat e o fservic e has stil l bee n rvqde d an d Taile d t o b e produced . 12 . Aviolatio n dat e ofJul y24 , 20D8 wa s sited , allege d servic e dat e o fJul y 23 , 2010 . Again , th e complainant s serve d th e respondent , requirin g respondent' ^ signatur e fo rdeliveryafte rth e 2 yea rperio d o n Jul y27 , 2010 , herei n afte rth e statu e o flimitations , 13 . I t appear s Ms William s forgo t o rwa s unnbl e t o complet e he rdu e diligenc e t o ascertai n tha t M rBake rwa s e n o monitorin g program , becaus e sh e just barel ygo t th e violatio n i n as i t was , withi n th R propose d 1 da ybefor e th e 2 yea rth e statu e o flimitations , i findee d tha t wil l prov e t o b e accurate . Since sh e acte d unde rfals e fundamenta l premises , sh e shifte d th e caus e o factio n onc e sh e realize d M rBake rwa s alway s employe d b ylarg e companie s an d o n o progrnm . 14 . Complainant s hav e faile d t o plea d t o specifi cnumbere d allegations . B

yfailur e t o addres s th e specifi cpleading s an d thereb yevadin g an d circumventin g respondent' s specifi callegations , complainant s hov e indubitabl yan d injuriousl ypropagate d redundan t an d iterat e pleading s fo ra casf t tha tappeare d voi d a b initto . Whil e the yma yhav e complie d wit h th e admlni<;trotiv e la wcod© / I tobviousl yhas bee n confusin g an d inadequat e i n Ihi^;+ DM S 01005/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA A350005/004 2

cas e an d non-complian t wit h highe rcourt s o rFedera l cour tRul e 10(b) , limitin g eac h numbere d pamgrap h t o on e circumstonc e t o "promot e clarity" . Complainant s referenc e t o § 13.208(c ] pertain s t o th e origina l complaint , no t th e natur e o fth e subsequen tpleodir^gs ,

15 . Complainan t refer s t o § 13,208(f) , whil e n o suc h cod e exists . 16 . Judicia l Estoppel s a s define d i n Black s Lega l dictionary : Fstoppel s tha tprevent s a part yfro m contradictin g previou s declaration s mod e durin g th e sam e o rearlie r proceedin g I fth e chong e i n positio n woul d adversel y offec fth e precedin g o rconstitut e a frau d o n th e court . 17 . Th e complainant s hav e admitte d t o formall yreleasin g th e prio rl A mechani cfoun d t o b e o n hi s ful l tim e employer s Drug/Alcoho l progra m b yM s William s lette ro fSeptembe r23 , 2010 , thereb ycomplainant s shoul d follo wsui t wit h lega l consistenc yb yreleasin g E d Bake rwh o wa s als o o n hi s ful l tim e employer s drug/alcoho l program , voidin g th e legitimac yo fth e complaint . Th e underlyin g circumstance s fo rth e 2 mechanic s ar e identical , 18 . Th e sol e an d primar ypremis e fo rthi s violation , clearl ydocumente d i n M s Vi/illiam s Inspecto rStatemen tlO P 9 record , wa s M s William s inabilit yt o volidat e FA Aapprove d dru g an d olcoho l testin g progra m informolio n fo rM r Baker . 19 . M s William s wa s give n evidenc e tha tM rBake rwo s o n a monitorin g progra m hu t selecte d no t t o pursu e primar / sourc e verificatio n and/o r confirmatio n o fthes e fact s pursuan tt o §1^.224 , fo rth e reaso n that'sh e wn s i n a rus h t o ge t he rallege d civi l penalt yout , 1 Ho ybefor e th e statut e o tlimitation? .a * DM S 0JOOG/O4 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA Aa,O0Q/O04 2 -U' l Of ,

20 . Onc e M s William s confirme d tha tM rBake rwa s alway s o n a monitorin g progra m unde rhi s disclose d ful l tim e employer , sh e the n shifte d th e fundamenta l boii s on d caus e o foctio n o fth e violatio n t o M rBake rno tbein g o n MRH s ow n companie s monitorin g program , despit e alread yreleasin g th e othe r Mechanic/I Afro m thos e regulations . 21 . I Tbecam e obviou s tha tth e revise d regulation s o fth e drug/alcohol s program s ne wdefinitio n o femploye rtha twor e no tevident , disclosed , o reve n know n b ya prio rFA ADruo/Alcoho l auditor , M R Vincen tRooh , d^.irin g hi s audi t o rMR H i n Marc h 200 4 an d thereb ycoul d no tinfor m responden to fth e change . 22 . I t becam e obviou s tha tth e revise d regulotion s o fth e drug/olcohol s program s ne wdefinitio n o femploye rtha twer e no tevident , disclosed , n reve n know n b yMRH s FAAoperoHon a an d molrrtenanc e Inspector s o rth e Allentow n FSD O manager . 22 . Agai n anothe rexampl e o fho wcomplainant s cho- wt o evad e an d circumven t thi s Issu e completel ydespit e responden trepeatedl ypresentin g a lette rfro m M rRoot s dote d Apri l 2004 , afte rTh e regulatio n chano « occurre d tha t n o on e kne wabout , 23 . Tha t th e comploinant s ar e tryin g t o hol d th e responden tliabl e fo r regulation s tha t eve n it s ow n FA Aofficer s wer e no tawar e ot , performe d safet y Inspection s fo ryear s t o promot e saf e operotlons . 24 . Th e complalrtctnf s ar e therefor e tryin g t o hol d th e responden tt o a highe rstandar d tha n thei row n FAAofficers .+ DM S 1007/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA A^^^^^^^^^ ^ v.-«>L»o" i \ ' f\r ,

2^ . Thi s basi s alon e warrant s voidin g th e legitimac yo fth e complain t an d demonstrote s maliciou s prosecution . 26 . Ther e wer e i n addition , severa l foctor s cloudin g th e clarit yan d ful l disclosur e o fthes e regulations , sinc e regulation s the ywer e no tclearl y contained , listed , Spelle d ou to ri n a forthrigh tmanne reviden twithi n th e signe d of fcomplianc e statemen t an d operationa l specifications , Thereb yhidden , conceale d an d encouragin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e i n th e spiri t o fsafety . 27 . Ther e wer e severa l matter s concernin g clearnes s an d interpretatio n o f fh e languag e an d meanin g containe d withi n th e signe d of fcomplianc e statemen t an d operationa l specifications , thereb yencouragin g violation , rattie r the n effecliv e complianc e i n th e spiri to fsnffit yan d contrar yt o standar d prnrtice s I n Administratio n law .

I n Administrativ e Lo w"i n ih e interpretatio n o ffh e languag e o freguh^ions , wher e doub texist s a s t o fh e infen fo fth e meonin g o fth e languag e writte n an d enacte d b ya governin g body , fh e languag e shal l b e Interprete d i n favo ro ffh e Part yon d agains tan yirnpiie d exreos/o n o fa rexfnction" . 25 . Complainant s hov e als o trie d t o hol d MR H liabl e fo rno thavin g M r Bake ro n Its ow n companie s monitorin g program , durin g th e tim e whe n responden t recognize d I n goo d judgmen tt o withdra wal l operation s o tMR H an d i n accordanc e t o regulation s i n orde rt o no l impos e ris k l o th e public .

- ; •c* . ^ DM S 01008/04 2 02/03/201 1 11-25_FAX^

_202493514 2 FA A0OOO8..OO4 2

26 , Th e othe ranimadversio n is tha tth e violation s cite d b ycomplainant s wer e conducte d b yinnocen tbystande rM rBaker , offe rMR H terminate d operotlon s an d wa s n o longe rperformin g flight s fo rhumo n facto rreason s affectin g th e singl e pilo t operato ri n goo d foit h on d i n complianc e with ;

119.6 9 Managemen tPersonne l Require d fo rOperation s Conducte d unde rPart13 5 o fthi s Chapter , (o j D R Helicopters , LLC mus thov e sufficien tqualifie d managemen t an d technica l personne l t o ensur e th e safet yo fit

s operallon.'s . OR Helicopters , LL C mus t hav e qualifie d personne l servin g i n th e followin g o requivalen tpositions : [ 1 ) Directo ro f Operations . (2 ) Chie fPilot . (3 ) Directo ro F Maintenance , Re.spDnden t wa s th e Directo ro fOperotlons , Chie fPilo tan d th e Maintenonc e Schedule rdu e t o th e huma n factor s o fo litigiou s tragi cdivorce , suicid e ris k

o fmino rchild , custod ybattle , tim e on d responsibilit yrestraint s o fhi s cardiolog ypractice , responden ti n goo d judgmen tan d i n accordanc e t o th e obov e regulation , stoppe d Operations . 4 . I n summary , is i 1 obundantl ydeo rtha tth e conduc tb ycomplainant s represent s procedura l an d prosecutoria l overreaching . a . Tha t th e complainant s or e tryin g t o hol d th e responden tT o a highe r standar d tha n Thei row n official s i n regar d t o regulation s tha twer e no teviden to r known . b . Ther e ar e Issues o fjudicia l estoppels , lego l inconsistenc yan d procedura l defects . - 8 -d ^ DM S 0)009/04 2 02/03/201 1 T?-2 5 FAX , 202493514 2 FA A^0006^004 2

c . Tha t inappropriat e actio n ha s bee n toke n agains ta smal l singl e pilo t operatio n tha t ha s bee n operatin g i n th e re d fo ryear s an d ha d lon g stoppe d operatin g i n du e diligence , goo d judgmen tan d goo d faith , accordin g t o regulation s du e t o huma n factor s o fa trogi cdivorc e cas e scenari o i n orde rt o no f expos e th e publi ct o undu e risk . d . i^apidl yinitiate d th e oppropriot e change s onc e responden tbecam e awar e i n goo d faith , despit e no tperformin g operation s fo ryeor s prior . e . Tha t preciou s scarc e judicia l resource s ar e bein g squandere d o n o cos e tha t appear s frivolous , trivial , withou tmerit , whil e representin g a n aggressiv e prosecutoria l pursui t tha t lack s prope riniti o tive , perspectiv e o rgoo d judgment . f . Th e lega l pursui t i

s no twort h th e cos ta tth e ta xpayer' s expens e o rfo r judicia l economy . g . Th e statu e o flimitation s wa. s exceede d .

WHRREFORE , Th e responden tpray s tho l thi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gran tth e Motio n fo rjudgmen t t o dismis s thi s cn-^e i n effort s o fjudicia l economy . Respectfull y.Submitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . CFI- H NJ^ O Dot e , .02/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X 202493514 2 FA A ^ DM S

.- . s^viri M I ft A 

# O U.S . Dijporman f o fTronspcrlatto n F«d«ia i Aviatio r Arimlnlstrntlo n 12)010/04 2 iaOOlO/004 2

170 1 Columbi a Avenu e Colleg © Park , G A3033 7 Augus t 14 . 200 9 Certifie d Mai l - Rntur n Receip tRequeste d Fil e Number : 2OO9SO06O43 4 Dr . Michae l B . Seli g Presiden t M an d R Helicopter s LL C 204 5 Westgat d Driv e Bethlehem . P A1801 7 Dea rDr . Selig ; O n Jul y2 1 an d 23 , 2009 , w e inapecte d M an d R Helloopter a LLC' a dru g an d alcoho l tottin g program s t o determin e complianc e wit h 4 9 CF R par t4 0 an d 1 4 CF R part 12 0 (formerl y1 4 CF R part 121 , appendice s I an d J) , A s a reagi to fthi s inspection , th e followin g apparerj t violation s wer e discovered : 1 , M an d R Helicopter s LL C di d no tdotarmin o tha tEugen e Melntost i an d Edwar d Bake r(contractors ) vwer e covere d unde ra FAA-mandate d dru g testin g progra m 3n d a n alcoho l misus e praventlo n progra m prio rt o usin g thei rservices . 2 . M an d R Helicopter s LL C di d no tconduc tpre-emplnyment.dru g test s an d receiv e verifie d negativ e ten tresult s prio rt o hirin g Eugen ? Mcintos h an d Edwar d Bake rt o perfor m safety-sensitiv e functions . Thi s lette ri s t o infor m yo u tha tthes e matter s r^r e unde rinvestigatio n b yth e F/\A . Yo u ma ydiacu.s s thes e matter s wit h m e o rsubmi ta writte n statement , o rboth , withi n 1 0 day s o freceivin g thi s letter . Pleas e contac tm e a t(404 ) 306-617 5 i fyo u hav e question s abou t the.'^« ! matters . Awritte n statemen tshoulrtInclud e al l pertinen t fact s an d mitigatin g circumstance s tha tyo u believ e ma yhav e a bearin g o n thos e matters . Sen d you rwritte n statemen tto : Attention ; Latony a Williams , AAM-86 2 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o fAerospac e Medicin e Dru g Abatemen t Divisio n 170 1 Coljmbi a Avenu e Colleg e Park . Q A3033 7 AAM-rtii V ia i ttaijTirJQ K-^pul .

SU7T3a»*73Sr "

OTt"



# raifSfnClALUS

E ONLY ' Publi cavQilQbllil yt o b e determine d unde r5 US C 55 2 i ^ LwuiBm s

tUTT " AnOT'M a kvtJ90 L

UkAiiTli^, : :;v<.i«» L PPTIT ;

nOUT1M< l AVUttO L tr«7ruj.£jd b

10L1TTU C CrMl»C>< - msc ^

tourMo«rME<C L lUTiU^.^. I02/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA A DM S 1^011/04 2

10O11/Q04 2

itNDEH ; CiVivif-iM rIMI S S , •Comptot a It4ffl » 1 , a , an d 3 . Alt o eamplat o iie m 4 i rnsilrleiM I 0*llM< yM <re«|rad . •Pfln i yco rnam e ar o oooreB B o n i M ravaix^ s o «h « yr « can rertum s wcar cra yiJu . * Attac h <hl « car d «

o * •bnc Ko fth e mallpise© , o ro r\h « frontI ffpaa a Parmlti , 1 . A(t/d»M«*i««d» ; Dr . Michae l B . Seli g Praaid«n t M an d R Hsiicoptar s LL C 204 5 Westgat s Driv e 

### Bethlehem , P

AIfl0l 7

2 . AniaaNunw r ntvata i m m »»\K » M6B O p a For m 3811 , Fwruar y>f«la . * jgmrioaiypo BlQertlllMMa U Q Inwre d Mi l •EKiMeakrid '

D N«ru m nacalpt fa rMttcAordl M BuMau d DiJNwy

J (Eii ^ / ^ O v a 7Q0 7 un a DDOS 375 4 «?SSH - I Doiruii E nrtur n ftooolpt 10MJ»<n,M.lBU l

UNIT6 D STATr^

POSTA LSCRVIC e 

# -"'"-^''^^^^^«^-^-.,,,,,, , .i;;^;;:;;;;;;; ^

^''d^i^^ t Aviatio nAdmini^uiion - - • ^"ff^fru g &Akoho lProgram , CollegePark

G A3033 7 •ilTH : AAM.363/Laionv a mHiam s ''^'''"—''".li.ln,J.,i,[i,„in,li.j„ ) iJiiii i



## FO R OFFICIA LUS

E ONL Y Publi covoilabilll yt o b e determine d unde r5 USC 55 202/03/201 1 17:2 5 FA X202493514 2 FA A+ DM S 21012/04 2

aooii/oo-i s ^ fji.tfi.\ j I

*** " IJ.S . DspcKtmen tOfflc o o fAviatio n MwJlcln « BO O Inciapondeiio * AVU, . s w . orTr<anjpOft«lH<w > Wnshlnslon , P.C , 2089 1 Fedaira i Av)a\le, n Adminietfafio n AP R 2 2C0 4

ra. . Certlfled-RBtijr n Racelp t Fi b Number : aOO-ilEAeiqCT S Dr . MIohae l Selig , CE O M an d R HellcoDtar

s LL C 20A 6 WeBtgat « Drive . SuM

e 10 1 Bethlaham . P

A1801 7 Daa rDr , S«l g O n Marc h 3 , 2004. , yo u \^e,r m Informe d ttiatth o Federa l Aviatlc n Adminlslratb n (FAA i wa s Invnstlgatln g ailags a violatlon a o r4 9 GFR Par t 4 0 an d 1 4 CP R Piar

t I2i , App&ndlce s i an d J . Aftu rneviawin g th e evidsrc © compllft d durin g tJn

a Inspectio n ofM an o R Helicopters LL C o n Februar y26 , 200 4 an d th e documentatio n svJbmiUe d i n you rrespons e data d Marc h 1ft , 2004 , I t appafl m ths t M an d R Helicopters LLC di d not compl ywit h al l provision s o r th e Antldrj g an d AJooho l Miaua * Prfsvendo n Program s a $ detaile a oeiow : 1 . M an d R H«|lcoptor « LLC© specime n collectio n prflr.miurn n d o no t mee t ih » raq«Jremane « o f4 9 CF R Part 40 . .SpaciflcallV' . I Wan d R Hellooptera LLC' s collnr.to r(Oanss e Wllllar/CH S 02 ) Tailed t o complet e Ste p 1 ite m E , Vest t o B e Performed , o n tl>6 Federa l Dru g Testin g Custod yen d Contro l Form , C9rj:eclivaj°).ct|o] rAtth o inspectio n outbrieflng . M an d R Holicoptera LLC agree d to ensure Ih e colletno rwoui a complet e sto p 1 o n th e Federa l Dru g Testin g Custod yan d Contro l Form , i n th e reBpons © date d Marc h 19 , 2004 , M an d R Helicoptsrs LLC ajbmttteo a copyo fa n Erro r Correctio n Trainin g Chackils t fro m cimioa l Laboratorlee . Inc . documentlns i trainin g fo rOenoso Miller . 2 . M an d R Hnllcoptari t LLC' s bre«t h alcoho l leetln g prooeduce e d o no t irieetth o requ)t'6mont e o f4 9 CF R Port 40 . 3pecificBlly : M pind R Helicopter * LLC' e Breat h Alcoho l Technicia n (Denes e Miller/CH S 02 ) faile d t n complet e Ste p 1 Ite m C , th o Deslgnata d Employia rRepresentative , o n th e Ocpartrnen Lo r TrenoportaUo n AlDoh m Testin g Form . Corraeciv e Action : A

t th e Inspectio n oulbriofing , M an d R Heilr:Dpt:f>r« ; LL C agrae a t o immadiatel yensur e tha t th e Brear h Alcono l Technicia n woul d complet e Ste p 1 ofth e Alcoho l Testin g Farm , ( n th a respons e date d Marc h 18 , 2004 , M an d R Helicoptars LLC aubmltto d a cop yo fa n Erro rCorreotlor i Trolnin cChecklist fro m Clinica l Laboratories , irc . documemln g trainin g fo rOenes e Milter . 

## 6^.^/ 1^ DM S 0013/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 6 FA X202493514 2 FA A^ooV3/OOi i

3 . Wan d R HellcoptftrvLL C faile d t o malntBl n recojho s a s require d b y4 9 CF R Part 40 . Specirioally : I Wan d R Hallcoptors LLC' s (aborator'yraile d transmi t th e employw rspecifi caggregat e etetbtica l summar

ytor200 3 t o th e employe ro n a semi-annua l baels , C(;>rrecHv e Ac^jpn . A

t th e Inapoctlc n outbrieflng , M en d R HeHcop\ar & LL C agree d t o immsdialal yansura th e la b wil l sisn d statistica l sumnnarie B fo r2003 . I n th e reepons o date d iviorc h 18 , 2004 , M an d R Helicopters LL C submitte d a copiB B ofaggregat e etatietica l aummarle s fn r200 3 fro m LabCorp . Thi e I s t o confir m that yo u have cattafectorll ycorrscte d th a abov^ e iosuee . v^

e ha^ o glvs n conslderntio n to al l avullabl e fact s an d conclude d Tha t thoe s leeae s d o not warran t lega l enforcemen t actio n I n lie u o fsjc h action , w e are lesuin g thi s jpttsr , whic h wil l b e med e a maMo rofrecord . W

& ej^pecttha l i n th e futur e M an d R Helicopters LLC' s Antidru g an d Alcoho l MIBU9 6 Preventio n Progrem a wil l b ^ m cnmpilanco w(t h a^ppllcabl e regulation s Sincerely , Vincen t O . Root a Inepeotor . Complianc e an d Enforoemen t02/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S I L ^ I I o ^1n m rA A 11014/04 2 @0014/00il 2

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281 6 0refiel d Roa d Allentovvn , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTAAEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHIN(STON , D.C . Fodftra l Aviaiio n Adminisfrntio n Laur a Ponfo , Lotony a William s Complainant s M < LR Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 7010'121 1

RESPONDENT

S REPL YTO COMPLAINANT S RESPONS E TO TH E MOTIO N TO HAV E TH E HEARIN G LOCATIO N A TTHt : U, S DISTRIC

TCOURT , ALLENTOWN . PA . AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH | (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Repl yt o Complainont s Respons e t o th e Motio n To rHearin g a t th R U.S . Distric t Court , Allentown , PA , 1 . O n Octobe r1 , 2D10 , a n th e informn i hearin g wa s hel d wit h M s Pont o a t whic h tim e I t wa s discusse d a cour i locatio n fo ra futur e hearin g i n Allentown , PA , o fth e U S Distric t Court . 2 . I t is respondent s positio n tha tth e mos tappropriat e an d reasonabl e I o f4c, 6 * DM S 0015/04 2 02/03/201 1 17-2 6 FA X202493514 2 FA A00015/004 2

hearin g locotio n I s Allentown , sinc e Iho ti s wher e th e violatio n wa s investigated , initiate d on d generate d b yM s Williams , requirin g 2 visit s (specificall yt o th e join t cardiology/ai rcharte roffice] , tl> e sit e o fth e allege d violatio n occurre d i n Allentow n whereb yi t woul d onl yfollo wsuit e tha tth e hearin g locatio n shoul d thereb yals o b e hel d i n th e Allentow n location , th e plac e o forigi n an d origina l jurisdiction .

3 . Complainant s no wstat e tha tt o com e f o Allentow n "woul d b e o tremHRdou s Inconvenienc e an d expense" . 4 . I t appear s i t wa s no to tnemendou s inconvonlenc e an d expens e t o com e t o Allentow n t o Initiate , fin d an d impos e thi s frivolou s allege d civi l penoltv , oullin n D rSall o awg yfo rhour s fror n h b privat e cardloloci vproctice , bu tnovyis a n incrinvenienc e t o appea rt o •tt/bstantlnt e an d defen d he rpositions , 5 . Th e complainant s hov e evade d an d circumvente d th e mai n reaso n fo rrespondent s reques t to rth e Allentow n location , whic h a s state d i n respondent' s lette ro fNovembe r24 , 2010 , tha th e a solo , priva+ e proctic e I.ehig h Communit ycardiologi'j f(fo rIh e las t2 3 years ) wit h hospito l an d outpatien t responsibilities . T o leov e th e are a woul d pos e undu e hardshi p t o hi s patients . I t woul d no t b e prope ro rreasonabl e t o burde n o rinconvenienc e neutra l part ypatient s an d a physicia n fo ra n allege d violatio n tha th e di d no l initiate , ha s cause d n o harm , lock s lega l meri tan d o n ver yweo k grounds . 6 . 1 1 woul d no t b e proper , reasonabl e o rmorall yo rethicall y appropriatel yt o compromis e a physician s clinica l responsibilitie s i n hi. s offic e o ri n 2ot 4• > HM- ^ 01016/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 6 FA X202493514 2 FA A^ooic/oo^ ^ I I L » , wTni M rft A

th e hospifo l i n a manne rtha twoul d delay , interrup tcontinuit yo fcar e o r compromis e patien t car e an d potentioll yincreas e liabilitie s o rris k t o hi m o rhi s patient s i n hi s rol e o fprovidin g emergent , acut e an d chroni cpubli cheat h car e service s t o th e community . 7 . I t woul d b e mos toppropriat« , prope ran d reasonabl e tha tsinc e th e violnfio n occurred , investigated , initiote d an d generate d b ycomin g t o th e Allentow n Location , requirin g 2 visit s (specificall yl o th e Join tcardiology/ai r charte roffice ) Ihe n i t woul d onl yfollo wsui ttho thearin g thereb yb e hel d i n th e Allentow n location , wher e th e allege d violatio n occurre d an d th e locatio n o f th e originatin g jurisdiction . 8 . Responden t disagree s wit h M s Ponfo s statemen ttha tth e Allentow n locatio n wa s neve rdiscusse d i n th e informn i conference . 9 . As discusse d I n respondent s lette rt o Judg e Voder , th e tim e M s Pont o mentione d tha t Philadelphi a i s onl y1 hou ran d 1 5 minute s away , i s incorrect - n s i tis close rt o 2 hour s a t of fhours , bu tcn n b e severa l hour s additiona l i n hol d u p tim e durin g busines s hour s du e t o th e insurmountabl e traffi co n Th e Schuylkil l Expresswa y an d i n th e downtow n area . Ther e i s a s wel l heav yai rtraffi can d continuou s delay s i n Philadelphi a airpor t are a o s compare d t o th e eas yacces s t o Allentow n bul h i n ai ran d groun d traffic . Th e cost s woul d als o b e greate ri n th e Philadelphi a area . 10 . I fth e complainant s ar e conceme d wit h conservin g governmen tfunds , th e mos t effectiv e effor t i s t o dismis s thi s cas e now , befor e an yfurthe rtime , expense s o rpotentia l appeal s squande reve n furthe rresources . 3 o f4a . • > DM S @l017/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 6 FA X202493514 2 FA A^0017^ 2

, K - ^-^O WIrt

rt

11 , Th e responden t hereb ypropose s fh e following ; assumin g th e prio r sugoft'ite d date s wer e mean tt o appl yt o 2011 , a tthe : U S Distric t Cour t 50 4 Hamilto n .Street Allentown , PA . 1810 1 12 . Responden t woul d b e le d t o believ e tha i th e Honorabl e Judg e Vode r woul d nee d t o se t u p th e hearing.-s , unles s otherwis e notified . WHEREFORE , Ih e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gran tth e Hearin g locatio n i n Allentown , PA , th e originatin g locatio n an d jurisdictio n o tIh e atlftoe d violation . Respectfull ySubmittRd , Michae l B , Selig , MD , FACC . Dat e

4 o f402/03/201 1 17:2 6 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S I < j ^/^o m rn A 1018/04 2 50O19/004 2

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281AOrefieldRoa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a PonIo , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responrien t v . Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 2010-121 1

RESPONDENT

S REPL YTO COMPLAINANT S RESPONS E T O TH E MOTIONS : DEPOSITIO N O F LATONYAWILLIAM S DEPOSITIO N O P CYNTHI ADOMINI K

AN D TH E PRE-TRIA LCONFERNC E A TGALLAGHE R REPORTING , ALLENTOWN . PA . AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LR. .SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters . LLC , (MRH | (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m over s on d file s th e followln o Repl yt o Complainant s Respons e f o th e abov e Motions :

1 . O n Decembe r1 , 2010 , responden tfaxe d an d file d a Motio n fo r Depositio n o fLatony o William s t o M s Ponto , t o tak e piec e i n Allentown , PA . 2 . I n complainont s respons e date d Decembe r20 . 2010 , complainan t agree d l o mak e avoilobl e M s William s fo rDepositio n an d cite d erre d date s o f I* DM S 1019/04 2

availabilit yfo rth e pre-trio l depositio n o f"Januar y28 , 2010 , Febnjor y1-4 , 2010 , Februar y8-11 , 201 0 o rFebruar y15-17 , 2010" . 3 , I n complainant' s typica l metho d o fevadin g an d circumventin g th e pleadings , a s wel l o s no t respondin g t o enumerate d paragraphs , complainant s hav e faile d t o confir m I fth e abov e dote s the yprovide d or e stil l available . 4 , O n Decembe r21 , 2010 , responden tfile d a motio n t o specificall y reques t fh e depositio n t o b e I n th e Allentow n Location . 5 . O n Jonurjr y13 . 2011 , complainant s serve d thei rrespons e 1 3 day s later , i n tha t reply . Miami , Florid a wa s mentio n a s a suggeste d location , whic h ols o I S unacceptabl e t o th e respondent . 6 . Complainant s no wslat e tha tt o com e t o Allentow n "woul d b e a Tremendou s inconvenienc e an d expense" , 7 . I t Qirar^eor

s i t wa s no ta tremendoti s inconvenienc e an d expens e fo r M s William s t o com e t o Allentow n t o Initiate , fin d an d iminns e thi s frivolou s a 1 1 e oe d civi l pennlt/ . pullin g D rSel l a awa vfp rhour s fro m hi s privat e cardiolog y practice , bu t no wis a n inconvenienc e t o appea rt o .•^ubstantiot e an d defen d he rposition.' ; 8 , Th e complainant s agai n evade d on d circumvente d th e mai n reaso n fo rrespondent s reques t fo rth e Allentow n location , n s state d I n hi s lette ro f Novembe r24 . 2010 , namel yth e respondent s primor Yrol e i n th e Lehig h Communit ya s a solo , privat e practic e cardiologis t(fo rth e las t2 3 years ) wit h hospita l an d outpatien t responsibilities . To leov e th e are o woul d pos e undu e - 2 '+ DM S 0020/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 6 FA X202493514 2 FA A0oo2O/OO. 2

J I I I M I O /

^

hardshi p t o hi s patients . I I woul d no tb e prope ro rreasonabl e l o burde n o r inconvenienc e neutra l part ypatient s an d o physicia n fo ra n allege d violatio n fha t h e di d no t initiate , wa s a n innocen tbystande rto , ha s cause d n o harm , lock s lega l meri t an d o n ver ywea k grounds . 9 . I t woul d no t b e proper , reasonable , morall yethica l c^oppropnot e t o compromis e a physician s clinica l responsibilitie s i n hi s offic e o ri n th e hospiin l i n a manne rtha t woul d delay , interrup tcontinuit yo fcar e o rcompromis e poi'K^n f car e an d potentiall yincreas e liabilitie s o rris k t o hi m o rhi s patient s i n hi< : rol e o f providin g emergent , acut e an d chroni cpubli cheat h cor e service s t o th e community .

10 . I t woul d b e mos treasonoble , prope ran d appropriat e sinc e th e violatio n occurre d i n Allentow n t n hov e M s William s retur n to rdepositio n t n th e plac e wher e he rorigina l investigotio n an d initiatio n o factio n occurred , namel y th e Allentown ; th e originatin g jurisdiction ,

11 . Responden t disagree s wit h M s Ponte s statemen ttha tth e Allentow n locatio n wa s neve rdiscu-r^e d i n th e Informa l conference .

12 . As discusse d i n respondent s lette rt o Judg e Yoder , th e tim e M s Pont o mentione d tha t Philadelphi a is onl y1 hou ran d 1 5 minute s away , i s incorrect , a s i tis close rt o 2 hour s a t of fhours , bu tca n b e severa l hour s additiona l i n hol d u p tim e durin g busines s hour s du e t o th e insurmountabl e traffi co n th e .Schuylki KExpresswg y an d I n th e downtow n area . Ther e i s a s wel l heav yai rtraffi can d continuou s delay s i n th e Philadelphi a Airpor t are a a s compare d t o th e eas yacces s t o Allentow n^ DM S 0021/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 6 FAX202493514 2 FAA^0021/00. 2 L « . Vjni n rr

\ A

bot h I n ai ran d groun d troffic . Th e cast^ woul d als o b e greate ri n th e Philadelphi a areo . 13 . I fth e complainant s ar e concerne d wit h conservin g governmen tfunds , th e mos t effectiv e effor t is t o dismis s thi s cos © now , befor e an yfurthe rtim e o r expense s ar e expended , 14 . Responden t agree s tho tther e wa s onl ya pleadin g discussio n i n regar d t o th e deposition , bu t mentione d durin g th e informa l conferenc e conr.-.f?rnin g th e hearin g locotion . 15 . M s Wllllom s state d t o th e responden ttha tsh e "travel s al l ove ro.s par i o f he rjob " an d als o mentione d th e reo.sn n sh e wa s delaye d i n som e o fth e follow-u p dncumenToTlon , wo s sh e wg s traveling . \6 . Th e responden thereb ypropose s th e following ; Assumin g fh e prio r suggeste d dote s wer e mean tt o oppl yt o 2011 , usin g a tim e o f1 0 am . M s Willia m ca n chos e th e dat e mos t fittin g t o he rschedul e t o appea ra tth e Allentow n locatio n namel yat : Golioghe rReportin g an d Video , LLC . 160 0 Lehig h Parkwa yEast , Sui t1 H Allenrown , P A1810 3 Onc e th e dat e i s selecte d tha tbes tsuit s he rschedul e fo rtfi e pre-tria l deposition , responden t wil l fir m u p th e othe rdetails .

12 . Responden t agree s t o cove rth e cost s pertainin g t o th e meetin g roo m an d cour t reporte rdirectl ywit h Gallaghe rReporting .

13 . I fM s Domini k

i s unwillin g t o provid e th e prio rrequeste d slolemen to f

4 .02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A^ DM S 0022/04 2 I I L f. \i>jr\v \

{"H A I210022,'00-1 2

truth , the n thi s tim e an d locolio n ca n h e utilize d fo rhe rdepositio n a s well .

U . Afte rth e abov e i s completed , a pre-tria l conferenc e co n b e held . WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gron i fh e deposition s o fLatony o Williams , M s Domini k an d th e pretria l conferenc e i n Allentown , FA , th e originatin g locatio n an d jurisdictio n o fth e allege d violation . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC , Dot e

- 5 -02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A + DM S 0023/04 2

I3Opil3/0O4L '

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 28l 6 0refleidRoa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l AviaHo n Adm/nrstraHo n Cynfhi o Dominik , Laur a Ponfo , Latony o WillFom s Complainant s M & R Helicopters . LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Federa l Docket . No : 2010-121 1

RESPONDENT

S REPL YT O MOTIO N FO R JUDGMEN TTO DISMIS S JUDICIA Le.STOPPELS , LCGA LINCONSISTENC Y AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAF L9 . SEDG , MD , FACC , CFI-H , principl e fo rM & R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ] who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Repl yT O Complainant s Re.^pons e t o th e Motio n fo r Judgmen t t o Dismis s base d o n judicia l Estoppel. s an d Lega l Inconsistenc y

1 . Th e complainont s hav e continue d t o foi l f o plea d t o specifi cnumbe r paraaraphs , P yfailur e t o addres s fh e specifi cpleading s an d thereb yevadin g an d ctrcumventfn g responaent' s specifi callegations .^ DM S 0024/04 2 02/03/201 1 11-2 J FA X202493514 2 FA A^O02vo04 2

2 . Th e complainant s hav e admitte d t o formall yreleosin g th e prio rl A mechani cfoun d t o b e o n hi s ful l tim e employer s Drug/Alcoho l progra m b yM s William s lette ro fSeptembe r23 . 2010 . 3 . Thi s releas e pertaine d a s wel l t o claim s tha tth e Mechnnic/l Awa s no t o n a drug/alcoho l monitorin g progra m specificall yunde rMRH , 4 . M s William s wa s convenientl yavailabl e t o inspec tth e primar yplac e n femploymen t o fth e Mechanic / lA , t o easil yaffir m hi s credibility , credential s an d tha t h e wa s o n a monitorin g program . 5 . M s William s wa s unwillin g t o affir m tha tM rBake rwa s o n o monitorin g program , sinc e hi s plac e o femploymen twa s no tnearby , 6 . Th e sol e an d primar ypremis e fo rthi s violatio n the n shifte d 0 5 documente d i n M s William s Inspecto rStatemen tlO P 9 record , t o M s William s inabilit yt o validat e an yFAAopprove d dru g an d olcoho l testin g progra m informatio n fo rM rBaker . 7 . M S Williom s wa.' ? give n evidenc e tha tM rBake rwa s o n o program , bu t chos e no t t o pursu e primer / sourc e verificatio n and/o rconfirmatio n o fthes e fact s pursuan t t o §13.224 . befor e sh e rushe d l o judgmen tt o affir m he rviolatio n wa s entered , onl yon e do yprio rt o th e 2 yea rstatut e o flimitations . 8 . I n M s William s n.i5 h t o Judgmen tan d pus h t o ge the rpropose d civi l penall yentere d jus t unde rth e wir e fo rth e statut e o flimitations , >ih e faile d t o se e tha t th e allege d violation s cite d b ycomplainant s wer e performe d b yM rBaker ,

# «-»--" . .):-,"L--^=" ^ " * *° " «o..,r"" "

otle rMR H terminate d operation s an d wa s n o longe rperformin g flight s fo r huma n facto rreoson s affectin g th e singl e pilo toperato ri n goo d fait h on d i n complianc e with :

119.6 9 Miihii||;einca

TPersonne lRequire dfo r Opci'ikti<>n! < Conducte dunde r

Far t 13 5 o f thJ s Chapter , (ti) D R nelicopt«j;a , LT,

C mus t huv esufficient

qualifie d niiinagciTitnt

andtochnictilpcrionn« lto rnsun c ch e«iitfot y o f its ; operacioiiK. D Rlielicoptera , LL C mus t li3V « quali.(ial pcr.sciniTe lservin g inTh

efollowin g o r

equivalen t

po.sitions : (1 ) Directo r

nreoperations . (2 ) ChlofPito L(3 ) Diivvto r o f Maintenance . Responden t wa s th e Directo ro tOperations , Chie fPilo tan d th e Maintenanc e Schedule rdu e t o th e huma n factor s o ta litigiou s divorce , suicid e ris k o fa mino rchild , custod ybattle , tim e an d responsibilit yrestrolnt s o thi s cardiolog ypractice , responden tI n goo d judgmen tan d i n accordanc e t o th e abov e regulation , stoppe d operations , 7 . Onc e M s William s confirme d tha tM rBake rwa s continuousl y(withou t break ) o n a monitorin g progra m unde rhi s disclose d ful l tim e employer , sh e the n agai n thifte d th e basi s o fth e violatio n t o M rBake rno tbein g o n MRH s ow n companie s monitorin g progrom , despit e alread yreleasin g th e othe r Mechanlc/l Afo rfh e sam e coun to fthos e regulation s tha twer e no tevident , disclosed , o reve n know n b ya prio rFAADrug/Alcoho l auditor , M rVincen tRoot<; . MRH s FAAoperation s an d maintenanc e Inspector s o rth e Allentow n FSD O manager , 8 . i n addition , ther e wer e severa l factor s concernin g fh e ambiguit y - 3 -02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A^ DM S 0026/04 2 I , £.-,1 1 ij.von p rft A laocias/ooti: ; regardin g disclosur e o fregi.ilotions , regulation s tha twer e no tclearl ycontained , listed , spelle d ou t o ri n a forthrigh tmanne reviden twithi n th e signe d of f complianc e statemen t an d operationa l specifications , thereb yhidden , conceale d an d encouragin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e I n th e spiri t o fsafety . 9 . Ther e wer e severa l factor s concernin g unclea ran d dispute d interpretatio n o fth e languag e an d meanin g containe d withi n th e signe d of f complianc e .statemen t an d operationa l specifications , thereb yencourogin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e i n th e spiri to fsafet yon d contrar yf o standar d practice s i n Administratio n law .

I n Admini-vtrntiv e La w"I n th e interpretatio n o fth e langijngf ? o fregulations , wher e doub tex/st s a s f o th e inten t o fth e meanin g o fth e languag e writte n an d enacte d h ya governin g body , th e languag e shal l b e interprete d i n favo ro fth e Part yan d agains tan yimplie d exfens/'o n o fa restriction" . ID . M s William s a s wel l ha s trie d t o hol d MR H liabl e fo rno thavin g M r Bake ro n it s ow n companie s monitorin g program , despit e M rPake rbein g o n hi s ful l tim e employer s monitorin g program , durin g th e tim e whe n responden t recognize d i n goo d judgmen tt o withdra wal l operation s o fMR H on d i n accordanc e t o regulation s I n orde rt o no timpos e ris k t o th e public . 11 . B ywa yo fJudicia l Estoppel s an d f o b e legoll yconsistent , complainant.' ! shoul d follo wsui tb yreleasin g E d Bake rwh o wa s als o o n hi s ful l

• 4 -- > DM S 0027/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FAA30027/00* 2 > I I u . wkjnii i for ,

tim e employer' s drug/alcoho l program , jus ta s th e mechanic/l Av\^ns formall y release d fro m thos e violation.^ , thereb yvoidin g th e legifimoc yo fth e complaint . 12 . I t woul d appea rinappropriat e fo ra goliat h actio n t o b e take n agains t a smal l singl e pilo t operatio n wh o ha d lon g stoppe d operatin g i n du e diligence , goo d Judgmen t an d goo d faith , accordin g t o regulation ? du e t o huma n factor s o f a Tragi cdivorc e cos e scenari o an d cardiolog ypractic e tim e constraint s I n orde r t o r»o t expos e th e publif : t o undu e risk . 13 . I t woul d appea rInappropriate , trivio l an d frivolou s fo ractio n t o b e take n agains t a smal l singl e pilo t operatio n wh o ha d don e n o harm , wa s a n Innocen t bystander , tha t ho s bee n operatin g i n th e re d fo ryear^ . ho d close d al l financia l account s an d ha s n o assets . 14 . I t woul d appea rinappropriat e fo ractio n t o b e toke n whe n change s wer e rapidl yinitiated , onc e responden tbecam e awar e i n goo d faith , despit e no t performin g operation s to ryear s prior . 15 . I t woul d appea rinappropriat e t o tak e octio n agains tresponden twhe n th e cos e appeare d pas t fh e statut e o flimitation s an d tim e barred . 18 , I t appear s tha t preciou s scarc e judicia l resource s ar e bein g squandere d o n a cos e tha t appear s frivolous , trivial , withou tmerit , whil e representin g a n aggressiv e prosecutoria l pursui ttha tlack s prope rinitiative , perspectiv e o rgoo d judgment , 19 . I n goo d judgmen tan d wit h prope rperspectiv e i twoul d appea rthi s lega l pursui t i s no t wort h th e cos ta tth e ta xpayer' s expense , sinc e n o har m- > DM S 0028/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2_

7 FA X_ 2024^935142 FA A^0026/004 2

occurre d an d whe n operation s wer e bein g preforme d prio rt o th e violation , the y wer e don e goo d faith , i n accordanc e t o th e clos e guidanc e an d supervisio n o f th e routin e FA AInspectors , therefor e i n th e ligh to feffort s o fjudicia l economy , fh e cos e shoul d b e dismissed . 20 . I fwoul d appea rcomplainant s ar e causin g mor e har m on d ris k b y takin g th e responden t concentrotio n awa yfro m hi s cardiolog yservlcp s h e render s t o th e community . 21 . Complainant s stol e tha tth e agenc yonl yt ^ precede d wit h on e violatio n eve n thoug h ther e wer e 2 , du e t o evidentiar yreasons . I tno wappear s tha t ther e ar e evidentiar yreason s wh yth e remainin g allegatio n I s als o Insufficient . WHEREFORE , th e responden tprny s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour l wil l gran tth e Motio n fo rjudgmen t t o dismis s thi s cas e o n th e ground s o fJudicio l Estoppels , Lega l Inconsistenc yon d I n effort s fo rjudicia l economy . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l & . Selig , MD , FACC , CFl- H Dal e02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FA A ^ DM S 0029/04 2

i2lDC23/0Qa 2

Michae l Seilg , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown , PA , 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters . LLC , Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket ; 2010-121 1

RESPONDENT

S REPL YTO COMPLAINAf^ S RESPONS E TO TH E MOTIO N FO R MOR E

DEFINIT E STATEMENT ORDE R AN D SETTLEMEN T AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE Lft, -StLlG , MD , FACC , principl e to rM R Helicopters , LLC , jMRH ) (non-operotiono l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s on d file s th e followin g Repl yt o th e Complainant s Respons e t o th e Motio n fo rmor e definit e statemen t i n repl yf o complainant s filin g receive d Januar y10 , 2011 , Complainant' s Respons e t o Orde ro fChie fAdministrativ e La wJudg e Establishin g Procedures . 1 . T o dat e responden tha s no tye tbee n sen/e d wit h a n orde rfro m th e

- 1p . , . DM S 0030/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FAABl0O3O,.o04 2

Administrativ e Judg e concernin g a definit e procedura l schedule , 2 . I n complainant s abov e pleading , responden tdisagree d wit h complainont s statemer> l tha tcomploinon * ha s mod e reasonabl e effort s fo r settlemen t on d t o resolv e thi s cas e a tth e informa l stage . A tth e informa l stage . Th e cous e o factio n cite d b ycomplninants , wa s o n incorrec tallege d claim s Iho t innocen t bystande rM rBaker , wo s o n N O monitorin g progra m whii R performin g safet ysensitiv e function s o n MR H aircraf ti n 2008 , 3 . I n th e steadfast , unyieldin g position , complainant s hav e refuse d t o addre.*i 3 thi s flawe d fundamenta l foc tan d shifte d th e primar ycaus e o factio n o f thei rcomplain t fro m M rBake rno tbein g o n an yMonitorin g progra m (confirme d tha t h e was) , t o M rbake rno tbein g o n MRH s ow n employer s i n existen t monitorin g program , despit e unde rJudicia l Estoppel s an d wit h Lega l inconsistency , complainant s ho d alread yrelease d th e Mechan)c/l Awh o wa s als o foun d t o b e o n o monitorin g progra m b yhi s tul l tim e employer . Se e Motio n to rJudamen t t o Dismiss-Judioa l fatopgels. Lega l Inconsistency . 4 . Therefore , quit e t o th e contrary , complainant s hav e bee n Unreasonabl e an d egregiousl ychange d thei rcomplain tbosi s t o pursu e a violatio n b ywhateve rmean s neede d t o warran tthei rfrivolou s violatio n i n a movin g targe t o fchangin g on d inconsisten tcolo ro fla worgumenU . 5 . Complainant' s hav e mad e n o additiona l conflrmotio n o raddition s t o th e abov e statements .

, " 5 .02/03/201 1 17:2 7 FA X202493514 2 FAA+ DM S 0031/04 2 •-, - ..... . rr. . 00031/004 2

WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray ^ tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twill : 1 . Hov e complainant s confir m tha tthe yagre e tha tM rBake rwa s o n a Drug/Alcoho l progra m durin g th e dote s cite d i n th e complain t/o r 3 . T o dismis s thi s cas e i n th e effor to fjudicio l economy . Respectfull ySubmitted , 

# •V i*-\i i / Michae l B . Selig . MD , FAC C Dot e _02/03/201 1 17:2 9 FAX202493514 2 FA A • > DM S 1032/04 2 aoC32/!)04 2

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFl- H 281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO P TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHlN«5TON , D.C . Federa l Avfah'o n Administratio n Laur a PonIo , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R HelEcoptert , LLCResponden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket' . 2010-121 1

RESPONDENT' S REPI YT O COMPLAINANT S ANSWERS T O TH F MOTIO N T O CpMP^ L DISCOVERYAN D NEWMAHg R AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . .SELIG . MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-existen t.sinc e 2009 ) who m over s an d Tiles th e followin g repl yt o MOTIO N t o COMPE LDISCOVER Yo fInformatio n requeste d o fLotony o William s an d Laur a Ponia , Esg . pos tth e 3 0 da yperio d accordin g t o Rul e 13.22 0 (d) ,

1 . Comploinant s hav e no tprovide d an yo fth e discoverie s requeste d i n prio rdocuments . 2 . Responden t ho s requeste d forma l evidenc e fo rdate s o fservice , sinc e i t ha s alread ybee n ^show n tha tdraf tdate s o n document s a s usuall y

•1r. A* DM S 0033/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 3 FA X202493514 2 FA A3,0033/004 2

severa l day s earlie rfro m actuo l servic e dates , canno Tb e truste d on d therefor e objectiv e signe d date s o fservic e nr e required , 3 . Arevie wo fth e EI R ols o show s inconsistencie s o fth e dat e o n fh e document s on d th e dot e o fdocumen twa s actuall yreceived . Exhibi ton e show s M s William' s lette rdraf tdat e o fAugus t14 , 200 9 on d o Certifie d Mai l retur n receip t requeste d confirmatio n day s 5 day s later . Thi s wa s th e onl ymoi l outhorlzotlo n provided . Thi s therefor e warrant s releas e o fth e repeatedl y requeste d objectiv e certifie d mai l receipt s o fsigne d validatio n o factua l serve d dates , Instea d o fusin g othe rsubjectiv e Information . 4 , Complainant s reference d 513.211{d)-Dot e o fService , Ther e are . severa l method s listed . 6 ydefinition , .sinc e complainan tselecte d signator ydeliver y confirmation , b ymean s o fsigne d retur n receipt , thi s represent s th e mos i accepted , reliabl e an d mos tobjectiv e dat e o fservice . Complainant s wen tt o extr o taxpayers ' expens e a ttripl e th e cos tt o clearl yvalidat e an d ensur e th e tru e deliver / date ; thi s supersede s othe rsubjectiv e metho d tha trelie s o n hearsay Base d o n th e obov e discreponcies , th e state d dote s o n th e document s b yth e complainant s canno t t^e truste d an d th e requeste d stric tproo fb e provided . 5 . Complainont s argu e tha tprovidin g reference d document s I s no t standar d practice , howeve rstandar d practic e include s ^am e for m o fsummai v o rquotation s o fpertinen t section s t o b e provided . .Sometime s larg e section s o f discussion s ar e provided . Complainant s hov e mod e n o o rscan teffor tt o provid e an yproo fo fevidenc e an d appeo ronl yconcerne d wit h evasiv e an d+ DM S 0034/04 2

conclus'ionar yInrfics . 6 . I n regar d t o M s Ponto' s spoliotio n on d redactio n o faltere d documents , no t eve n a referenc e t o th e kin d o fwithholdin g wa s provide- d an d thereb yquestioned . Bein g i tis he rdeportmen ttha tacte d i n Ihi.' i manner , i ti s to r he rt o provid e th e proo ft o substantiat e tha tthi s spoliatio n i s worronte d whe n questioned .

7 . Therefore , I n th e lette ro tOctobe r27 . 2010 ; i two s requeste d t o provid e th e referenc e o fJordo n vDeportmen to fJustic e tha tM s Pont o cite d i n he rcorrespondence . fi. f n th e lette ro fOctobe r27 , 2010 , H wa s requo.<;te d t o provid e th e referenc e fo rpolicie s o n alsclosur e restrictions . 9 . I n th e lette ro fNovembe r24 , 2010 . th e abov e item s wer e regueste d a secon d time . WHEREFORE , Ih e responden tpray s thn tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l eithe rdismis s th e cos e o n fh e basi s o fviolatin g Rul e 13.22 0 (d ) o rcompe l th e partie s Latony o Williom s an d Lour a PonI o t o produc e th e requeste d documerits . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . Dat e

3 -02/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X 202493514 2 

### FA A + DM S 

# Q

U.S . Departmen t o t Trorspcrtorto n Pmavc t AvloHo n A.amlnl»freino n 

### 0035/04 2 12)0035/004 2

170 1 Columbi a Ave.r,u a Collegf l Park . G A3033 7 Augus t 14 , 200 9 Certifie d Mai l ^ Retur n Receip tRequnitts d Fil e Numbe r2009SO9.'5043 4 Dr , Micha* ! B . Seli g 

## Presiden t M an d R Hcllwipler s LL C 204 5 Weetgat e Driv e Bethlehem , P A1801 7 Dea rDr . Selig : O n Jul y2 1 an d 23 , 2009 , w a inspecte d M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s dru g an d alcoho l testin g program s t o determin e complianc e wit h 4 9 CF R par t4 0 anr i 1 4 CF R part 12 0 (formerl y1 4 CF R par t 121 , appendice s I an d J) , A s a resul to fthi s Jn-spection , th e followin o apparen t violation s wer e discovered : 1 , M en d R Helicopter s LL C di d no tdetsrmln s tha tEugen e f\/lclntoa h nn d Edwar d BaKe r(contractors ) wer e covere d unde ra FAA-rnandate d dru g testin g progra m an d a n alcoho l misus e preventio n progra m prio rt o usin g thei reeivicas , 2 . M an d R Helicopter s LL C di d no tconduc tpre-employment.dru g test s an d receiv e verifie d negativ e tes treauit a prio rt o tiirin g Eugen e Mcintos h an d Edwar d Bake rt o perfor m safety-sensitiv e functions . Thi s lette ri s t o infor m yo u tha ttt->es e matter s ar e unde rinvestigatio n b yth e F/\A . Yn u ma ydiscus s thee e matter * wit h m o o rsubmi ta writte n statement , o rboth , withi n 1 0 day s o freceivin g thi a letter . Pleas e contac tm e a t(404 ) 305-617 5 I fyo u hav e question s abou t ttiae e matters . Awritte n statemen tshoul d includ e al l pertinen t fact s an d mitigatin g circumstance s tha tyo u believ e ma yhav e a bearin g o n thes e matters . Sen d you rwritte n statemen tto : Attention : Latony a Williams , MM-BS a Fedora ! Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o fAerospac e K/Jedlcln e Dru g /\batemer\t Divisio n 170 1 Columbi a Avenu e CDlleg e Park . G A3033 7 rnhKifriBUhCB * A*,M-9C 2

SlilllW * n'.L .

flSwnBSHTJTu i

fSiTCnTSBT "

hup://wwvk'.faa.qov/eboLrt/offlce ora/headquarters offlcss/avc/offloe5/aafn/druji_«lcohol / 

## FO R OTFICIAUIS E ONLY ' Publi cavallabllltyt o b e deteritilne d unde r5 USC 55 2 LWlUlBlTn ,

<our<is a vTMBU L llri'rML»'/Al g

WUTWf l STfuBo L

nwT»S(^UB6 L i>l(ni^LlirUI Q S/Vti "

•^Wi^TlNOaCKiOl ,02/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X202493514 2 FA A vOor trrt A • * DM S 0036/04 2

l3003S/00i) 2 ?:EMt)tii ! ^or.ifLFt e Til l a •Oampi»i»'ii*m s 1 , ',>. an d a . AI« Acompl«( a V» m * t fntfitrlola d Ociiv«r

yi s dsslrod . •Prin tyou rnam * an d addni u o() l/ wravws ^ t » tha t M'

a eo n ntu m tti « car d n ydu. ' •AtUd h (hi t«ac d ( « (h « bM k ar^ 9 malMaca , o ro n ih » Ifen ti t «pac « p«rml(a . -I . AtriClaAddranetflo ; Dr . Michaa J B , Seli g Prasiden i M an d f^-HoHcopfer s LL C 204 5 Waatgat e Driv e BatriBhem . P A1801 7 OAgtn l

e>. ' b dal|v«>

T•ddi«M^'M(i(ii))69fiirwi! '

. I fvea , «ib9r^l|X^^m » bfJaui ;

iS^niRB d Mal l n ^nfSBs ^ US i , •RgQinti M DR*tumR«>MlptWM9re/)an4I« « ; •wufi a M«i

i •e.0.0 . ^ 1 A . Reotilatc

d Drilvsry Trsrv a fM I av a I . Arllgl « Numba r (n»tttltrtr> m u/ytettwil ) P C For m 3911 , robruat y200 4 7DD 7 IM^ U 0^D_Da__37£ U _^5£4 _

. 1 •OIMWl s P4lu m fl<aal«l IM5»MJ-M-1« 0 (

UwTcp ST,*TI: S POSTA LSeFivic c 

# I I PCcbCiat * Mal i I Parmr t No , Q-f o * f?^*"'^'^^^ ^

prin t you rname , addreea , an d ZIP+4 m tW e box•

\< y "••. s •/^orfar,!/ Aviiuio nAdn^inistntio n• ' • JWColumbi aAvenu e" ' Co;% j Pai-k, O

A3033 7 jfi ATTM ' AAK{.4^2/Latonv amUhm s u >



### "il'il-m,)lniliLl,J,.i,ii,„),„i),)„j)i,„„.)|i, ]



## FO R OFFICIA LUS

E ONL Y Publi cavcllabllll vt o b e determlnfl d unde r5 USC 55 202/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S 1037/04 2 I u . V0 n I' l r^

A !a0O3T>0C4 2

Michae l Selig . MD , FACC , CFl- H 281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown . PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTNVtN TO P TRANSPORTATIO M

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Admlnfstratlo n Laur a Ponto , Lotony o William s Ccmplcilnant s Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : ?010-121 1 

# L M & R Helicopters . LLC . Responden t

RESPONDENT S REPL YT O MOTIO N T O DISMIS S COMPLAINAIMT S PROPOSE D PROCEDURA LSCHEDUL E AN D NOW , comesre^ipondenl , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD . FACC , principl R fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operaflono l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e follov^ln g Repl yf o th e Complainant s Respons e t o th e Motln n 1 o DISMIS S Complciinant s propose d dale s fo rsrfiedulin g deodlines . 1 . Th e violation s cite d b ycomplainant s snoul d b e render<? d moo ta s allege d act s conducte d b yinnocen tbystande rM rBaker , occurrin a befor e 2008 , afte rMR H tenminaie d operation s an d wa s n o longe rperformin g flight s fo r huma n facto rreason s affectin g th e singl e pilo toperato ri n goo d fait h an d i n complianc e with ; 

### 1r. * + DM S 0038/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X202493514 2 FA AUH b U ^ Wf^U I 1 AA

119.6 9 Mana0«mea t

Personne lRequire dfo r Operation s Conduce dunde r

Par t 13 5 o f thi s Chapter , (a) D R Helicopters , LL C rnus i hav esufficionlquaUflod managcineii i an dtechntcalpersonnall o ensur eili esafel y o f it s opcration.s . D RHalkc>pler.>i, LL C muiilliuvequalifie d pei-Bonne lservin g i nih o followin g o r equivalfer^

t f osilioris . (I ) Directo r

o f Operations . (2. ) Chie f

Pilot . (3 ) Directo r ofMaintemuico , Responden t wa s th e Directo ro fOperation^; , Chie fPilo tan d th e Maintenonc * Schedule rdu e t o th e fiuma n factor s o fa litigiou s tragi cdivorce , suicid e risk

o fmino rchild , tim e an d responsibilit yrestraint s o fhi s cardiolog y practice . rftTiponden l I n goo d )ud.gmen tan d i n cccordonc e t o th e abov e regulofion , stoppe d operations . 2 , Complainant s I n ba d fait h refuse d t o addres s an d continu e t o ovad e an d circumven t th e fac t tha tMR H wa s no toperationa l durin g th e cite d allege d violaiions , whil e i n accordanc e t o th e abov e r«oulatio n 119.69 , becaus e thi s woul d b e admittin g tha t th e Civi l Penolt ywoul d b e detective . 3 , M s Pont o averre d tha tth e violotin n wa s vali d a s I twa s admitte d tha t th e violatio n wa s 1 da ywithi n o fth e 2 yea rjfotut e o flimitatfons . Th e dat e o f servic e howeve rwa s 3 day s afte rth e stotut e o flimitation s an d Therefor e time bcirred . 4 , Comploinant s hav e shifte d th e primar ycaus e o factio n o fthei r complain t fro m M rBoke rno tbein g o n an yMonitorin g progra m (confirme d tha t h e wa.'s] , t o M rBake rno t bein g e n MRH s employe e monitorin g program , despit e unde r.Judicia l Estoppel s an d wit h Lega l inconMstency , complainant s ha dalread yrelease d th e Mechanic/I Awh o wa s ols o foun d t o b e o n a monitorin g progro m b yhi s ful l tim e employer . Se e Motio n fo rJudgmen tt o Dismiss-Judicia l Estopoels . Lega l inconsistency . 5 , Th e Complainont s als o refus e t o addres s th e fac ttha tn o FAAofftciaL s wer e informe d o fth e regulatio n chang e regardin g th e definitio n o femploye ro r appendi xI an d J , includin g thei row n FA ADrug/Alcoho l in,<;pecto rVincen tRoot s on d al l loca l FSD O FAAOfficial s performin g frequen tinspection s o fMR H record" ! an d aircraft , therefore , representin g entrapmen to n th e par to fcomplainant.f . 6 , I n th e proceeding s o fthi s case , complainant s hav e continue d t o fai l t n plea d t o specifi c©numerate d paragraph s a s i s commo n standar d practice , thereb yfailin g t o addres s th e specifi cpleoding s i n a succinc tmanner , choosin g who t matte rthe ywan t t o addres s an d theretj yevadin g an d circumventin g respondent' s specifi callegafion.s , whe n complainant s di d choos e t o respond , the ydi d s o i n a short , scant , impermissibl yvagu e an d conclusionar ymanner . Tti U conduc t b ycomplainant s ho s indubitabl yan d injuriousl ypropagate d redundan t an d iterat e pleadings . 7 , I t appear s i n thi s proces s M s William s an d M s Pont o ar e malfeo.^ont . hav e abuse d thei rdiscretion , or e i n breac h o fdut yan d conduc tt o caus e harm , ar e i n abus e o fprocess , havin g n o legall ycognizabl e caus e o faction , attemptin g t o migrat e an d cobblin g togethe rcolorabl e changin g argument ? t o mak e thei rallege d violatio n appeo rwarranted , whil e holdin g steodfos ta tal l cost s an d withou t humility , dignity , mora l o rethica l appropriat e behavior s an d i n• yDM S @l040/04 2 02/03/201 1 17:2 8 FA X202493514 2 FA Aaoodo/ood s

a n unconscionabl e manner . 6 , I n fh e sfieodfast , unyieldin g positio n o fcomplainant s t o thi s violation , preciou s scarc e judicia l resource s or e bein g .-squandere d o n a cas e tho t appear s frivolous , trivial , withou tmerit , whil e repr^asentin g aggressiv e prosecutorio l overr«ar.hin g an d pursui ttha tlock s prope rinltlollve , perspectiv e o rgoo d judgment , no t i n th e spiri to fgovernmenln l fun d conservation , a s th e litigatio n cost s o fth e complainant s wil l fa rexcee d fh e fine , assumin g arguend o fh e fin e wil l b e foun d t o hov e an yrneri fo rtha tther e ar e an yasset s wit h whic h t o pa ya n eve n reduce d fine . WHEREFORE , fh e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twill : a . eithe rdismis s thi s frivolou." ! r.ris e i n th e effor to fjudicia l econom y/o r b . grant s tho fth e Schedulin g deadlin e remoi n ope n o fthi s time , t o allo wfurthe r discovery , deposition s an d pre-tria ) conference , Respectfull ySubmitted , MIchOe l a . Selig , MO , FACC . \ Dot e

- 4 -02/03/201 1 17:2 9 FA X202493514 2 u i/<:4yi 0 n HioVA KFA X FAA * DM S 1041/04 2 [goOiii/Qoa s

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N ^ediro i Aviatio n X^minlitratlo n Cyr^thl a Dominik , Laur a Ponlo . LOTony a William i Cornplalnant s M L R Holicopteri , LLC . Rasponden t ,, . .__.. _ Honorabl e Judg d Ronni a Vod« i Docket : 2010-121 1 CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I HEREB YCERTIF

Yiha l 1 hav e thi s da yserve d th e foregoin g entriefa) : RESPQMDENT' 3 REPL

YT O MOTIO N T O DISMIS S TRUTH S O F ADMIS.SION S RESPONDENTS KCPL

YT O CQMPIAINAN H RESPONS E T O TH g MOTIO N T O HAV E TH E HEARIN G LOCATIO N A TtH E US DISTRICTCOURT . ALLEWTOWN . PA . RBSPQNDENTS «EPL

YT O COMPLAINANT S RESPONS E TO TH E MOTIONS : PePOSITlO N O F LATONY AWILLIA>^5 DEPOSmO N O F CYNTHI ADOMINI K

AN D A TGALLA<:;HF R RFPOBTING , ALLENTOWN . PA . gEtPONDENr S REPL

YT O MOTIO N FO R JUDGMEN TT O DISMIS S JUDICIA LE5TOPPI:l.,S , LEGA LINCONSISTENC Y RCSPONDENTS REPL

YT O COMPLAINAMT 5 RPSPONS E T O TH E MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E

STATEMEN T ORDE R AN D SETTLEMF.N T REaPONDENT. ^

REPL YT O MOTIO N T O DISMU S COMPLAINANT S PftOPOitP n PRQCEDUKA LSCHEDUL E RESPONDENT S REPL

YT O COMPLAINANT S ANSWER S TO TH E MOTIO N T O COMPE LDISCOVER YAN D NE WMAHE W R KPONDENT S REPL

YT O MOTIO N T O DISMIS S COMPUINANT S PR O POSE D PROCBDURA l SCHEDUL E

MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E STATEMEN T FAILIN G T O MEE TFILIN G DtAPUNE S MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEPINIT E STATEMEN T 119.6 9 SHUTDOW N AN D HUMA N FACTOR S MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E aTATBMEN T CHANGIN G TH E FUNDAMENTA LCAU-Sf : O F ACTIO N MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E STATEMBN T FAIUN G r o Mbl- l FILIN G DEADLINE S02/03/201 1 17:2 9 FA X202493514 2 01/24/201 1 9.0TA M FA X FAA • » DM S 0042/04 2

0OOa-2/OOJ 2

upo n aS parrid s o frecor d i n thi s proceeding , i n accordanc e wlf h th e requirsment s o fRul e 2 9 pursuan i t o 2 8 U . S , C , ^ \74 6 , Servic e b vfirsl-qkit s mnil . Dosioa e preoqid , oddresse d O S toUo^vj : Fpfciflra l Avloilo n Adrninislrofio n ao o Ind6p©ndcr\c e Avmnus . S W Wilbu rWrigh TAvenue-Suit e 2WI0C1 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Atl - Hearin g Docke tClwk , AGC-43 0 FA X20 2 49 3 5)4 2 Lour a Ponto . Esq , enfofcremen tDlvis:on/AGC-30 0 Offic e o fth e Chie fCoun.sB l F A A 80 0 Independence - Avenue , SW Woshinoton , D C 20S9 } FA X2022^ 7 5)0 6 Th e Honorabl e Ror^ni e A . Vode r U S Dopartmen t 0 ( Tran.'jnortaHQ n Offic e o fHaoringi , M-20 , Roo m El2-32 0 ]20 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue . S. E Washington . D C 2059 0 FAX20 2 36 6 753 6 By; . Michae l 6 . Selig , MD . FACC , 2dlA0rflfIeldfi:'oQ d Allentown , Po . 1810 4 6)036 0 S'.^ ^ Date : . 

### JA N 

### 2 4 Z01 1