alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re GRANITE APPAREL, INC., Bankrupt.

Bankruptcy No. 78-16.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.

Sept. 22, 1981.

Joseph T. Little, East Providence, R. I., trustee.

Everett C. Sammartino, Asst. U.S. Atty., Providence, R. I., for I.R.S.

*172ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue in this proceeding is whether, under § 57(n) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 App.U.S.C. § 93(n), the six-month period within which claims must be filed, commences on the date initially scheduled for the first meeting of creditors, or on the date that the first meeting is actually held.

The Bankrupt filed a voluntary petition in this Court on January 19, 1978,1 and notice was mailed to creditors that the first meeting of creditors was scheduled for February 7, 1978 at 2:30 p. m. Blizzard conditions throughout the northeastern United States, however, caused a cancellation of the meeting, which was rescheduled and held on February 28 at 11:00 a. m., pursuant to a second notice mailed on February 14, 1978.

The Internal Revenue Service filed its claim for delinquent taxes on August 15, 1978. The Trustee objects to this claim because it was filed more than six months after February 7. The IRS, contending that the six-month filing period did not commence until February 28 when the first meeting of creditors was actually held, argues that its claim is timely.

Section 57(n) provides, in part, that “[cjlaims which are not filed within six months after the first date set for the first meeting of creditors shall not be allowed.” The phrase “the first date set” contemplates the date on which the first meeting of creditors is *originally scheduled,*even if it is not actually held until a later date. No other reading of this phrase is possible.

The Trustee’s objection to the claim of the I.R.S. is sustained.

1

. Since the petition in this case was filed prior to the October 1, 1979 effective date of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1878 are controlling.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E103-E104]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      SGI PRESIDENT DAISAKU IKEDA

                                 ______
                                 

                  HON. HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 15, 2009

  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Madam Speaker,
  Whereas, SGI President Dr. Daisaku Ikeda visited Chicago in 1960, 
witnessed the discriminatory mistreatment of an African-American boy in 
Lincoln Park, and made a vow in his heart, ``I promise you that I will 
build a society truly worthy of your love and pride!''; and
  Whereas, this year marks 49 years of Dr. Ikeda's dedication to the 
peace and happiness of all humanity through peace, culture and 
education; and pledge to construct a peaceful world where individuals 
from all walks of life feel safe and secure while developing their 
fullest potential for the sake of their families and the greater good 
of society; and
  Whereas, on January 19th we honor and celebrate a noble and heroic 
life of Martin Luther King Jr., whose legacy was to secure not

[[Page E104]]

only civil rights but human moral rights for all people as expressed in 
his own words, ``Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere''
  Whereas, 40 years after the passing of Dr. King, we witness on this 
day the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama as 44th President of the 
United States, filled with confidence in the dream of Martin Luther 
King, Jr., and the prayers and efforts of countless ordinary heroes who 
believed that this day would one day be possible, expressed in 
President Obama's words, ``This is your victory!''
  Whereas, in my capacity as a member of the United States Congress, I 
would like to acknowledge these behind the scenes efforts of one such 
extra-ordinary hero by recognizing, SGI President Daisaku Ikeda, as an 
Emissary of Peace and Justice.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
                             ------------

                            CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2008, I, Andrew C. Plummer, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
       of the Company.


Date: July 17, 2008              /s/ Andrew C. Plummer
                                 -------------------------
                                 Title: Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
### The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-3883

___________ Carol Colligan, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Trans World Airlines, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 28, 1996 Filed: July 5, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ca rol Colligan appeals from the district court's dismissal of he r 1 diversity action for negligence, based on Colorado's statute o f limitations. After d e novo review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court's dismissal was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Marines with Task Force Koa Moana 22 Continue Improvements on the Joint Range Complex

By Lance Cpl. Gadiel ZaragozaI Marine Expeditionary Force

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Gebaj, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*May 10*

June 3, *1924.*

*Criminal law: Intoxicating liquors: Evidence: Sufficiency.*

In a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor, the fact that the bottles of beer used in evidence, and admitted to contain whatever alcoholic content the chemist’s labels showed, were not shown to have remained sealed from the time of seizure until analyzed, did not render the evidence insufficient for a conviction. p. 290.

Error to review a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*A. W. Richter*of Milwaukee, for the plaintiff in error.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, George A. Shcmghnessy,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *John P. Donnelly,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Donnelly.*

Rosenberry, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor and sentenced to the house of correction of Milwaukee county.

The sole question raised upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. It appears that four bottles of beer were seized on July 13, 1923. Upon the preliminary examination one of the bottles was offered in evidence and it was admitted that the alcoholic content of the bottle was in excess of one half of one per cent. At the beginning of the trial in circuit court, counsel for the defendant stipulated that the alcoholic content of the liquor purchased was whatever Mr. Huebner, the chemist, put on the labels on the three remaining bottles.' The bottles were received in evidence without objection, and upon the label on the bottles was the following:

> “Health Department. Alcohol 5.40 % by weight.

> “E. Huebner Analysis,

> “Chemical Laboratory Division.”

*290In the face of this record it is contended that, because it was not shown that the bottles remained sealed during the period intervening between the time they were seized and the time they were analyzed, the evidence was insufficient to show that the liquor had a greater alcoholic content than one half of one per cent, at the time of seizure. This contention is without a shadow of merit. The time of counsel, to say nothing of that of this court, might be better occupied than discussing a . question so flimsy and obviously without merit as is that presented by .the record in this case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
ex10-41.htm


Exhibit 10.4(i)


 


AMENDMENT TO THE PURCHASE ORDER FINANCING AGREEMENT


 


Amendment, effective as of January 17, 2008 (this "Amendment"), by and between Tulare Frozen Foods, LLC (the "Debtor") and Capstone Capital Group I, LLC (the "Secured Party").


 


WHEREAS, Debtor and Secured Party are parties to that certain Purchase Order Financing Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2008 (the "P.O. Agreement"), which provides for certain financing to the Debtor upon the terms and conditions contained therein;


 


WHEREAS, Debtor and Secured Party have agreed in good faith to amend certain definitions in the P.O. Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Debtor and Secured Party agree as follows:


 


1. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all terms used and capitalized in this Amendment, but which are not defined herein, shall be deemed to have the respective meanings set forth in the P.O. Agreement.


 


2. Article 1. Definitions, Section 1.1, the defined teem "Cash Advance Guarantee Fee" is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following definition:


 


" `Cash Advance Guarantee Fee' means 2.5% for the first thirty days (or part thereof) that each Purchase Money Advance is outstanding and 1.25% for every fourteen days (or part thereof) thereafter that Purchase Money Advance remains outstanding."


 


3. Except as amended hereby, the P.O Agreement, and the terms and provisions thereof, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. This Amendment, to the extent signed and delivered by means of a facsimile machine or other electronic transmission, shall be treated in all manner and respects and for all purposes as an original agreement or instrument and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.


 


 


[Signature page, follows.]






  





  











  











 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


Debtor:


 


TULARE FROZEN FOODS, LLC


a California Limited Liability Company


 








	
By: /s/____________________________

	  
	
Name:

	  
	
Title:

	  
	  	  
	
Secured Party:

	  





 


CAPSTONE CAPITAL GROUP I, LLC, a


Delaware Limited Liability Company




 








	
By: /s/____________________________

	  
	
Name:

	  
	
Title:
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:20:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Saint Lucie 2 Docket (050- 00389)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content G - Engineering G - Design 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

417

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

730

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations S - Surveillance 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical T - Testing 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:20:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Saint Lucie 2 Docket (050- 00389)

Work Planning & Practices / IR187 - Action implementation LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

1252

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 23
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ali Daood, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1012]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40193

 Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS OVIEDO-MEDINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1615-ALL 

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Carlos Oviedo-Medina appeals his sentence under

8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegal reentry into the United States after

having been deported. Oviedo-Medina asserts that the district

court erred in concluding that his prior state felony conviction

for simple possession of cocaine was an “aggravated felony” for

purposes of § 1326(b). Oviedo-Medina’s argument is foreclosed by

circuit precedent. See United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310,
No. 05-40193

-2-

312-13 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 30 F.3d

691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Oviedo-Medina also argues that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. This

challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Oviedo-Medina contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). OviedoMedina properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light

of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here

to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00414-CV

IN RE A. J. K. P., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the

201st District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-FM-11-000589

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 24, 2014
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quest Minerals & Mining Corp., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr.
------------------------------------------------
Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
April 21, 2004
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00306

- CR

Quintin Montgomery v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Cause No. S

- 20

- 3016CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 19, 2020
JTF-Red Hill Organizational Structure

COS

SecDef

COM

USINDOPACOM

Planning & 

Training 

Director

Operations 

Director

HQs Spt

EPA/DOH Sync

CJTF 

Red Hill

Response 

Director

PA, LA & 

Comm. 

Relations

Safety Comptroller 

& Audit Legal

Quality 

Assurance 

Director

Operational 

& Occup. 

Safety

Contract 

Oversight

Commander’s Oversight Group

Advises CDR on regulatory and legal matters and 

coordinates external communication

Environ.

Compliance

Spill 

Response

Fire & Safety 

Response

Deputy 

CDR 

• Conducts continuous planning

to safely and expeditiously 

defuel RHBFSF.

• Coordinates with all 

stakeholders for rehearsals 

prior to execution milestones.

• Oversees access control & 

surveillance of RHBFSF.

• Coordinates operational and 

occupational safety training 

for all JTF-RH personnel 

working at RHBFSF.

• Coordinates fire/spill response 

drills for JTF personnel with 

required emergency 

management stakeholders.

• Assesses all aspects of JTFRH to ensure optimal quality.

• Inspects facilities and safety 

equipment to identify/correct 

potential hazards.

• Audits drafted/awarded 

contracts to ensure the highest 

quality of work performance.

• Conducts pipeline unpacking/ 

repacking to support repairs.

• Controls all tank defueling ops, 

to include control room/AFHE, 

fuel movement/transfer, and

operator maintenance actions.

• Provides on-site monitoring of 

system and infrastructure.

• Conduct Recurring Maint & 

Minor Repairs (RMMR).

• Coordinate execution and lead 

oversight for fuel system and 

facility repair projects.

• Conduct add’l QC/QA thru 

indep. 3rd party of all repairs.

• Safety Surveillance & Control

• Oversees facility fire safety.

• Conducts immediate fire/spill 

response (w/ Qualified Indiv).

• Coordinates emergency 

response for CJTF-RH ICW mil 

and civ authorities.

• Ensures compliance with 

environment regulatory bodies.

Legend Regulatory Organizations

Strategic 

Engagement

Defueling Information 

Sharing Forum

Oversees inter-agency 

coordination, community 

and media engagement

EPA DOH

Oversees all aspects of 

defueling, both planning 

and execution

CAPT (S) Kevin McCormick, USN COL Letsy Perez-Marsden, 

USA

CAPT Steven Stasick, USN CAPT Shawn Triggs, USN CAPT Michael Obeirne, USN

VADM John Wade, USN

BG Michelle Link, USA BG Lance Okamura, USA

COL Jason Wingeart, USA

Contact JTF-RH at https://www.pacom.mil/JTF-Red-Hill/Joint-Task-Force-Red-Hill/

Defueling Coordination 

& 

De-confliction 

Working Group

Coordinates all other 

plans / ops related 

to Red Hill Facility

Repair & 

Maintenance

Director

Defuel 

Operations

Holds JTF to Federal and 

State standards; provides 

oversight

Brings local community 

members, elected 

representatives and other 

stakeholders together w/ 

JTF leadership to discuss 

defueling and to provide 

critical community 

feedback

Military 

Engineering 

Escorts

Repair

Projects

Preventive

Maintenance

As of 20 December 2023

Rehearsals

Planning Access Control 

Point Guards

Site Safety 

Training

Response 

Training

FLC Rovers
Manas Petroleum Corp.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com



















































	[Ort], Datum	[Ort], Datum
	 	 
	Horgen, 27/09/2010	Windisch
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Unterschrift Schenker	Unterschrift Schenker
	 	 
	/s/ Heinz Scholz                
    	/s/ Eric Herlyn             
    
	Heinz Scholz	Eric Herlyn