alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# High Mobility Artillery Rocket Blasts Off

By Airman 1st Class Nick Emerick18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO SUCH  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
INCOME.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,658
<PP&E>                                             932
<DEPRECIATION>                                      30
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        287
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,009
<SALES>                                            108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   108
<CGS>                                              100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (10,823)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,355)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.20)

<FN>
Amounts  inapplicable  or not  disclosed as a separate  line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Statement of Operations are reported as -0- herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 93290-93291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27672]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion; Notice of Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic 
Inclusion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA), and after consultation with the General Services 
Administration, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation has determined that renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee 
on Economic Inclusion (the Committee) is in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the FDIC by law.

[[Page 93291]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Debra A. Decker, Committee 
Management Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898-8748 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee has been a successful 
undertaking by the FDIC and has provided valuable feedback to the 
agency on important initiatives focused on expanding access to banking 
services for underserved populations. The Committee will continue to 
provide advice and recommendations on initiatives to expand access to 
banking services for underserved populations. The Committee will 
continue to review various issues that may include, but not be limited 
to, basic retail financial services such as low-cost, sustainable 
transaction accounts, savings accounts, small dollar lending, prepaid 
cards, money orders, remittances, the use of new technologies, and 
other services to promote access to the mainstream banking system, 
asset accumulation, and financial stability. The structure and 
responsibilities of the Committee are unchanged from when it was 
originally established in November 2006. The Committee will continue to 
operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on November 21, 2024.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27672 Filed 11-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



             SECTION 906 -- CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and in connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Doane Pet Care Company for the quarter ended September 27, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer of Doane Pet Care Company hereby certifies
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Doane Pet Care Company.


Date: October 30, 2003




                                        /s/ Philip K. Woodlief
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Philip K. Woodlief
                                        Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                        Doane Pet Care Company
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Maui General
Store, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

May 13, 2005                         /s/ Richard H. Miller
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Richard H. Miller (Chief Executive
                                      Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices1997

# Change Notice 97-008

IM001

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL PIPB

 

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents issued with this change notice.

REMARKS:

**IMC 0303** (Inspection Follow-Up System) has been revised to require entry of noncited violations and nonconformances (vendor inspections only). These entries are no longer options. The instructions for treating escalated enforcement items has also been clarified.

**IP 40501** (Licensee Self-Assessment Related to Team Inspections) has been revised to correct an incorrect reference to an inspection manual chapter in addition to other minor editorial changes.

**IP 62003** (Inspection of Steel and Concrete Containments at Nuclear Power Plants) is issued. The Commission issued new inspection requirements for containment structures at nuclear power plants when it amended 10 CFR 50.55a, which endorses the 1991 Edition of the ASME Code, Subsections IWE and IWL. The Civil Engineering and Geosciences Branch prepared this new procedure to provide guidance to inspectors for inspecting the implementation of the new rule. The new rule became effective September 9, 1996, and requires licensees to complete the examinations required for the first period of the first ISI interval of ten years before September 9, 2001.

**IP 87103** (Inspection of Material Licensees Involved in an Incident or Bankruptcy Filing) has been revised to incorporate more implementation guidance and to include a new appendix providing guidance for inspection of materials licensees who have filed for bankruptcy.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 17, 2020
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

**** 

Date:  July 30, 2009                                                    /s/ Greg Wujek

                                                                                      Greg Wujek

                                                                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

----
No. 86-711.

#### Pecora et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Benjamin Bullock *v.*Edward Bullock *Ex’r. of*Micajah Bullock.

Where *non assumpsit*and the *statute of limitations*are pleaded, and the jury find the general issue for the defendant, this court will, not examine the charg-e of the judge on the plea of the statute.

The case of *Morisey v.. Bunting, (ante*1 *ml.*3,) approved.

This was an action of assumpsit, tried at Granville, on the last circuit, before Norwood, Judge.

*Pleas*— general *issue*.and the *statute of limitations.*The plaintiff excepted to the charge of the judge upon the plea of the statute of limitations. The jury returned the following verdict: *“*that the defendant’s testator did not assume.” Upon this verdict judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*Bevereux,*for the plaintiff.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

Ruepin, Judge.

The court is precluded from considering the judge’s charge by the verdjet on the general issue. It is found by the jury that the defendant’s testator did not assume *;*which puts the other issue, on the statute of limitations, and the instructions of the Superior Court on it out of the question. As the existence of the debt is negatived, the judgment must of course be affirmed: To this *Morisey*v. *Bunting, (ante*1 *vol.*3,) besides other cases, is a direct authority.

Per Curiam.--‘Judgment appirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAQUELINE MARITZA MARRON DE

AGUILAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71408

Agency No. A079-648-734

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jaqueline Maritza Marron de Aguilar, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing

her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and due process claims, and

FILED

SEP 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71408

for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Mohammed v. Gonzales,

400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Marron de

Aguilar participated in alien smuggling as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i). 

Her sworn statement reflects she assisted two Mexican nationals in an attempt to

enter the United States illegally. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) (an alien is

inadmissible if she has “knowingly encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided

any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law”).

Marron de Aguilar’s due process rights were not violated by the admission

of her sworn statement because the document was probative, and its admission was

not fundamentally unfair. See Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310-11 (9th Cir.

1995) (noting that “[t]he sole test for admission of evidence [in a deportation

proceeding] is whether the evidence is probative and its admission is

fundamentally fair”). Marron de Aguilar had the opportunity to cross examine the

preparer of her statement and she produced no probative evidence that cast doubt

on the document’s reliability. See id.

Marron de Aguilar’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Registrant.
  By
    /s/ Peter J. YoungerPeter J. Younger, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp., General Partner
of the Registrant /s/ Frank P. VaughanFrank P. Vaughan, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos
Capital Corp., General Partner of the Registrant A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

                    -----------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-KSB of AmeriChip International Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc
Walther, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 17, 2005

                                        /s/ Marc Walther
                                        ----------------
                                        Marc Walther, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

          - 12 CFR Part 1006

# AGENCY:

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

# ACTION:

Advisory opinion; revision of date of applicability.

# SUMMARY:

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is revising the date of applicability of the advisory opinion entitled “Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Deceptive and Unfair Collection of Medical Debt” to January 2, 2025.

# DATES:

This advisory opinion is applicable as of January 2, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George Karithanom, Regulatory Implementation & Guidance Program Analyst, Office of Regulations, at 202-435-7700 or at:                         *https://reginquiries.consumerfinance.gov/​.*                         If you require this a document in an alternative electronic format, please contact                         *CFPB_Accessibility@cfpb.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Bureau issued the advisory opinion entitled “Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Deceptive and Unfair Collection of Medical Debt” on its website on October 1, 2024 and published the advisory opinion in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 4, 2024. As issued and published, the advisory opinion stated that it was to be applicable as of December 3, 2024.                

To allow sufficient time to brief issues raised in pending litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the CFPB is revising the applicable date of the advisory opinion to January 2, 2025. The advisory opinion itself creates no binding legal obligations, and the revision of the applicable date does not affect regulated entities' responsibility to comply with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as enacted by Congress and described in the advisory opinion.

Rohit Chopra,

Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2024-27791 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P
No. 82-1058.

#### Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. *v.*Connecticut et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2413
KASANGISHA PAPY KABANGU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-282-521) Submitted: November 8, 2006 Decided: November 30, 2006 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION; Karen E. Torrent, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kasangisha Papy Kabangu, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s denial of his request for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kabangu , No. A96-282-521 (B.I.A. Nov. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED