alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Destroyer Transits Taiwan Strait

U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Submitted on record and briefs April 22,

reversed and remanded June 23, 1993

#### RAYMOND JOY WRIGHT, *Appellant, v.*Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(92C-10153; CA A75171)

854 P2d 1009

John E. Storkel, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *Boone v. Wright,*314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992).
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1336 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States with flexibility 

in providing choice of coverage through managed care under Medicaid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Mr. MULLIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

States with flexibility in providing choice of coverage 

through managed care under Medicaid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE FLEXIBILITY TO PROVIDE CHOICE OF 

4 COVERAGE IN MANAGED CARE. 

5 Paragraph (3) of section 1932(a) of the Social Secu6 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u–2(a)) is amended to read as 

7 follows: 

8 ‘‘(3) CHOICE OF COVERAGE.—A State may, at 

9 its option, permit an individual to choose a managed 

10 care entity from two or more such entities that meet 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1336 IH

1 the applicable requirements of this section, and of 

2 section 1903(m) or section 1905(t).’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.



|             |  |                                                                
|------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                            
|             |  | Graham V. Smith                                                
|             |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

p0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

147955

RANDY BERKSHIRE,

Plaintiff

- Appell ant,

v SC: 147955

COA: 314467

Ingham CC: 12

- 000277

- AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne**, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photon Dynamics, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ Jeffrey A. Hawthorne   **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne**   **President and Chief Executive Officer**   Date: August 9, 2005
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(iii)A(82)



AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into on the dates set forth below by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and Barry R. Goldman (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Change in Control Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2018 (“CIC Agreement”), providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the CIC Agreement); and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the CIC Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the CIC Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 3.1(b) is amended by adding a new subparagraph 3.1(b)(6) as follows:


(6) Any benefit payable in accordance with the terms of the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2019, except as otherwise noted (the “SERP”); provided that if Executive’s Termination Date occurs prior to the date that Executive has three (3) Years of Credited Service (as defined in the SERP), Executive shall be deemed to have earned three (3) Years of Credited Service thereunder. 
		
	2.
	This Amendment to the CIC Agreement shall be effective on August 20, 2019.  Except as hereby modified, the CIC Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date(s) written below.
	
				
	 
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
	 
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

	/s/ Barry R. Goldman
	 
	By:  
	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel

	Barry R. Goldman
	 
	 
	VERNON J. NAGEL

	 
	 
	 
	Chairman, President and CEO

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:________________________________
	 
	Date:_______________________________
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
24  LLC  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB  for  the  period  ended
December  31,  2006,  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008
**Exhibit
      13.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Prana Biotechnology Limited (the “Company”)
      on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoffrey P.
      Kempler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/Geoffrey
      P. Kempler *


Geoffrey
      P. Kempler


Chief
      Executive Officer




December
      21, 2005




*  The
      originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
      Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 26, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 26, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0444. LUCY BEDELLE NIX v. FRANK EUGENE SCARBROUGH.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SPDR201901152
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 3 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

KAYLENE MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SHEILA E. WIDNALL, Secretary of

the U.S. Department of the Air Force,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6150

(D.C. No. CIV-95-402-A)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on her

claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-16. In

the course of her employment with the United States Air Force as a mechanic,

plaintiff filed several administrative complaints alleging discriminatory treatment. 

In this action, she does not complain of discrimination, but of retaliation for her

numerous administrative complaints.

We review summary judgment orders de novo and apply the same standard

as did the district court. See Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 968

F.2d 1022, 1024 (10th Cir. 1992). Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no

genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a

matter of law. See id. “We view the evidence and draw any inferences in a light

most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment, but that party must

identify sufficient evidence which would require submission of the case to a

jury.” Id.

With regard to administrative complaint 92-067, the district court found

that plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case of reprisal because the conduct

identified by plaintiff fell short of creating a hostile work environment and was,

therefore, not actionable. See Purrington v. University of Utah, 996 F.2d 1025,

1033 (10th Cir. 1993) (holding that prima facie case of retaliation requires proof

of protected activity, adverse action by employer, and causal relationship between
-3-

protected activity and adverse employment action). In a separate order, the

district court found failure to establish a prima facie case on administrative

complaint 93-289. It found that plaintiff’s 1993 performance appraisal was not a

negative evaluation and, therefore, did not constitute adverse employer action.

After review of the record, we affirm the district court’s thorough orders of

August 21, 1995, and February 28, 1996, for substantially the same reasons as set

forth therein. The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western

District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
#### H. Holzinger et al. v. James H. Gilbert.

1. Bill of Sale—By *a Husband to his Wife Acknowledged before a Notary Public,*Void.—A bill of sale of personal property, made by a husband to his wife (they living together), acknowledged before a notary public, is void.

Replevin.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 22, 1896.

M. L. Thackaberry, attorney for appellants.

Johnson *&*Morrill, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of replevin, the question presented *97being as to the validity of a bill of sale of personal property made by a husband to his wife, they living together, the same being acknowledged before a notary public.

Section 9 of the chapter of the statutes relating to husband and wife, is as follows: “ Provided, that where husband and wife shall be living together, no transfer or conveyance of goods and chattels between such husband and wife shall be valid as against the rights and interests of any third person, unless such transfer or conveyance be in writing, and be acknowledged and recorded in the same manner as chattel mortgages are required to be acknowledged and recorded by the laws of this State, in cases where the possession of the property is to remain with the mortgagor.”

The statutory direction in regard to the acknowledgment of chattel mortgages is (section 2 of chapter 95): *“*Such instrument shall be acknowledged before a justice of the peace of the town or precinct where the mortgagor resides, or if there be no acting justice in the town or precinct,” etc.

The judgment of the Superior Court, holding the bill of sale invalid as against the rights of an execution creditor of the husband, is affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 28th Bomb Wing Airmen, B-1s Support Valiant Shield

By Staff Sgt. Nicolas Z. Erwin28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 500

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Wayne R. Hellman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation: and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter on the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: January 21, 2005
/s/ Wayne R. Hellman