alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.02**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Sadia S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Welson TeixeiraJúnior, Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)                             the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                            the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Welson  Teixeira Júnior |                        |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Name:                            | Welson Teixeira Júnior |   |
| Title:                           | Chief Financial Officer     |   |
|                                  |                             |        |  |

 

June 27, 2007

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SadiaS.A. and will be retained by Sadia S.A. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### In the Matter of Mary Ann Reszel, Appellant, v Lucille L. Britt, Constituting the Niagara County Board of Elections, *795et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 990]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Koshian, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Election Law.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Wesley, JJ. (Filed Aug. 23, 1995.)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DESRON 15 Conducts Bilateral Training with Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force

Commander, Task Force 71/Destroyer Squadron 15 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00258

- CV

THIRTY

- EIGHT TH OUSAND FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($38,400.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI00346 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s amended brief was due September 14, 2018. On September 17, 2018, appellant filed a motion to abate the appeal, requesting this court abate the appeal to allow him to file a response to the underlying summary judgment proceeding. In his motion, appellant outlines what fact issues he would have raised in his response. However, as we indicated in our prior order, legal argumen ts setting out what errors were allegedly committed by the trial court should be presented in an appellate brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38. Accordingly, appellant’s

motion to abate is DENIED

. Appellant is reminded his amended brief is past due, and appell ant
is ORDERED to file his amended brief on or before November 5, 2018.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 785 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-488, K2025-485.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27961 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

June 12, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the period ended December 31, 2005, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Earl W. McNiel,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Earl W. McNiel                                       
|Earl W. McNiel Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,994
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,787
<PP&E>                                           1,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,977
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,172
<SALES>                                          4,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,081
<CGS>                                            2,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.21)
        

</TABLE>
Argued and submitted March 31,

affirmed June 23, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DAVID JAMES REARDON, *Appellant.*

(C91-11-35720; CA A74243)

853 P2d 1372

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

J. Dean Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*424PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in a five-count indictment. He pled guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and the state dismissed the other counts pursuant to plea negotiations. Defendant challenges the departure sentences imposed. The sentences resulted from the plea agreement, and, under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. *State v. Adams,*315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); *State v. Kilborn,*120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); *State v. Johnston,*120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsInspection ManualChange Notices2000

# Change Notice 00-005

Issue Date: 04/04/00

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

 

----

 

END

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, July 16, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          53,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                       761
<INVENTORY>                                     30,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,463
<PP&E>                                         150,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,981
<BONDS>                                         87,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,519
<SALES>                                         62,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,070
<CGS>                                           45,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
AFS-11-117-E 

February 24, 2011 

 Exemption No. 8842B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26746 

Mr. David L. Jones 

Corporate Aviation Education Director 

Aviation Institute of Maintenance 

4455 South Boulevard 

Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Dear Mr. Jones: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8842, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Aviation Institute of Maintenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under 

Air Agency Certificate Q5VT572K) for an extension of Exemption No. 8842, as amended. 

That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation 

Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately 

following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the 

experience requirements of § 65.77. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute. 
2 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8842, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8842, as amended, to 

February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8842 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8842. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephanie G. DiMarco, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advent Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Advent Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ Stephanie G. DiMarcoName:

Stephanie G. DiMarcoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer and President




I, Graham V.
Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advent Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Advent
Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ Graham V. SmithName:

Graham V. SmithTitle:

Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: November 14, 2003
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, Bruno Bonnell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2004, of Atari, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004       By: /s/ Bruno Bonnell     Name: Bruno Bonnell Title: Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1**  **792**

MR. JOHN MALCOLM DICKSON, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General of the United States of America; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, For the Eastern District of Virginia , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv - 0 0253

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : February 19 , 201 5 Decided: April 2, 2015

Before THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and William L. OSTEEN, Jr., Chief United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John M. Dickson, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM: John Malcolm Dickson, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s
order d ismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickson v. United

States , No. 2:13

- cv - 00253

- AWA

- DEM (E.D. Va. June 10, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED