U.S. EPA Data Request 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Johns Manville 

Cleburne Plant 

200 West Industrial Boulevard

Cleburne, Texas 76031 

Project No. 11-4191.02 

February 22, 2012 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

4949 Fernlee Avenue 

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073 

(248) 548-8070 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

i

Executive Summary 

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standard under Section 7412 of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to require that persons who operate any emission source 

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at 

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”. 

Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has required that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions 

for the purpose of providing residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing1. 

To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was 

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack 

associated with the Line 91 Melter Dust Collector located at Johns Manville in Cleburne, Texas: 

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29 

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) using SW-846 Method 0061 

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061 

Table I on the following page summarizes the overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

ii

Table I 

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary 

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector 

Test Dates: January 24th and 25th, 2012 

Test Methods Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm) 

USEPA 

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 9.4 x 10-2 1.0 

USEPA 

Method 29 

Filterable Chromium 

(FCr) < 1.5 x 10-5 1.6 x 10-4

Vaporous Chromium 

(VCr) 3.2 x 10-5 3.5 x 10-4

Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.7 x 10-5 5.1 x 10-4

USEPA 

Method 0061 

Hexavalent Chromium 

(Cr+6) 4.4 x 10-4 4.7 x 10-3

Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.8 x 10-3 1.9 x 10-2

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES .............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2

3.2 PM, FCR, VCR, AND TCR CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ................................. 3

3.3 CR+6 AND TCR CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ................................................... 3

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 4

TABLES 

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Overall Emission Test Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary 

FIGURES 

Figure 1 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – Method 5/29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES 

Appendix A – Field and Computer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes 

Appendix B – Process Data 

Appendix C – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix D – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

1

1.0 Introduction 

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standard under Section 7412 of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to require that persons who operate any emission source 

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at 

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”. 

Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has required that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions 

for the purpose of providing residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. 

To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was 

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack 

associated with the Line 91 Melter Dust Collector located at Johns Manville in Cleburne, Texas: 

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29 

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) using SW-846 Method 0061 

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061 

The emissions test program was conducted on January 24 and 25, 2012. The test program 

consisted of triplicate 240-minute emission tests for each parameter. The field sampling portion 

of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Barry Boulianne BTEC 

Matthew Young BTEC 

Shane Lee METCO Environmental 

Matthew Gillen METCO Environmental 

Shane Rennick METCO Environmental 

Ricardo Santos Johns Manville 

 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

2

2.0 Process Description

Glass batch is fed to two electric melters which flow to a forehearth, from there it flows through 

four spinner modules where the binder is added to form fiberglass. The two melters exhaust to a 

single dust collector. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

Process and control equipment data collected during the emissions test program includes the 

following: 

(1) Total Melter's Pull Rate (lbs/hr) 

(2) Melter Dust Collector Pressure Drop (inches H2O) 

Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control equipment data will be available to 

U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into 

three categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates 

using Methods 5/29; and 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas CR+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates using 

Method 0061. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.3, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content were conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Molecular Weight of Dry Stack 

Gas”(Integrated tedlar bags)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies. 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

3

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A, “Determination of Oxygen 

and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources”. The O2 content of 

the exhaust gas was measured using an M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer and the CO2

content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments (CAI) 600 

Series CO2 gas analyzer. A sample of the gas stream was drawn through an insulated stainlesssteel probe into a sample conditioner to remove the moisture from the sample before it entered 

the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition 

software. 

 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined gravimetrically. 

3.2 PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures 

of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 5 and 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission 

rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe 

w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of four GS impingers, (5) a 

length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% 

nitric acid (HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the 

fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the 

PM/metals sampling train is provided as Figure 3. 

3.3 Cr+6 and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of Cr+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using the 

procedures Method 0061. Cr+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using 

BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted 

of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a 

recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech® control 

case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first 

impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N 

KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel 

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

4

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary 

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector 

Test Methods Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm) 

USEPA 

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 9.4 x 10-2 1.0 

USEPA 

Method 29 

Filterable Chromium 

(FCr) < 1.5 x 10-5 1.6 x 10-4

Vaporous Chromium 

(VCr) 3.2 x 10-5 3.5 x 10-4

Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.7 x 10-5 5.1 x 10-4

USEPA 

Method 0061 

Hexavalent Chromium 

(Cr+6) 4.4 x 10-4 4.7 x 10-3

Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.8 x 10-3 1.9 x 10-2

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Field and 

computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix A. Process data associated with the 

emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Equipment calibration documents are 

provided in Appendix C. Laboratory analytical results are available in Appendix D. 
Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

5

Limitations 

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by Johns Manville. 

BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without Johns Manville’s consent except as 

required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent performance of 

its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with the normal 

standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

Brandon Chase 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
Tables 
Table 3

Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM cleburne

Source Designation L91 MBH

Test Date 1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 65.3 69.5 60.5 65.1

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 29.3 29.2 29.2 29.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 142.2 141.8 143.1 142.4

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 140.9 139.0 142.7 140.9

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 3.99 3.94 4.04 3.99

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 2.805 3.296 3.423 3.175

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0739 0.0739 0.0739 0.0739

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 10.63 10.51 10.80 10.64

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 10.50 10.36 10.64 10.50

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000357 0.000357 0.000357 0.000357

Isokinetic Variation - I 98.5 99.3 100.1 99.3

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 163.9 164.6 141.7 156.7

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.988 0.987 0.987 0.987

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.95 2.32 2.34 2.20

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0195 0.0232 0.0234 0.0220

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 27.9 27.8 27.8 27.8

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.0 35.5 34.8 35.4

Area of Stack (ft2) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft3

(Actual) 31,796 31,381 30,797 31,325

Flowrate ft3

 (Standard Wet) 25,083 24,642 25,103 24,943

Flowrate ft3

 (Standard Dry) 24,594 24,071 24,515 24,393

Flowrate m3

 (standard dry) 696 682 694 691

Total Particulate Weights (mg)

Acetone Rinse 4.0 1.7 5.7 3.8

Filter < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.3

Total < 4.3 < 2.0 < 6.0 4.1

Total Particulate Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 8.9E-04 < 4.2E-04 < 1.2E-03 8.5E-04

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 9.0E-04 < 4.3E-04 < 1.2E-03 8.6E-04

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.1E+00 < 5.1E-01 < 1.5E+00 1.0E+00

gr/dscf < 4.7E-04 < 2.2E-04 < 6.5E-04 4.5E-04

Total Particulate Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 1.0E-01 < 4.6E-02 < 1.4E-01 9.4E-02

 lb/ ton product

Filterable Chromium Weights (ug)

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) < 0.60 < 0.60 0.71 0.64

Filterable Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.2E-07 < 1.3E-07 1.4E-07 1.3E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 1.3E-07 < 1.3E-07 1.5E-07 1.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.5E-04 < 1.5E-04 1.8E-04 1.6E-04

gr/dscf < 6.6E-08 < 6.7E-08 7.7E-08 7.0E-08

Filterable Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 1.4E-05 < 1.4E-05 1.6E-05 1.5E-05

 lb/ ton product

Vaporous Chromium Weights (ug)

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 1.99 0.60 1.60 1.40

Vaporous Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) 4.1E-07 1.3E-07 3.3E-07 2.9E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) 4.2E-07 1.3E-07 3.3E-07 2.9E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 5.0E-04 1.5E-04 4.0E-04 3.5E-04

gr/dscf 2.2E-07 6.7E-08 1.7E-07 1.5E-07

Vaporous Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr 4.6E-05 1.4E-05 3.6E-05 3.2E-05

 lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weights (ug)

Total Chromium < 2.59 < 1.20 2.31 2.03

Total Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 5.4E-07 < 2.5E-07 4.7E-07 4.2E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 5.4E-07 < 2.6E-07 4.8E-07 4.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 6.5E-04 < 3.0E-04 5.7E-04 5.1E-04

gr/dscf < 2.8E-07 < 1.3E-07 2.5E-07 2.2E-07

Total Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 6.0E-05 < 2.8E-05 5.3E-05 4.7E-05

 lb/ ton product
Table 4

Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company Johns Mansville

Source Designation L91-MBH

Test Date 1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 62.2 66.1 58.4 62.2

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 29.3 29.2 29.2 29.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 143.3 138.6 146.0 142.6

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 140.9 134.8 144.2 140.0

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 3.99 3.82 4.08 3.96

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 2.508 2.475 3.117 2.700

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0742 0.0741 0.0739 0.0741

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0746 0.0746 0.0745 0.0746

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 10.64 10.18 10.88 10.57

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 10.52 10.06 10.74 10.44

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000349 0.000349 0.000349 0.000349

Isokinetic Variation - I 100.3 99.2 100.1 99.9

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 168.4 167.7 142.5 159.5

Oxygen Concentration (%) 20.0 20.0 20.2

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.9 28.9 28.8 28.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.7 28.7 28.6 28.7

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.991 0.990 0.987 0.990

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.75 1.80 2.12 1.89

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0175 0.0180 0.0212 0.0189

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 27.9 27.8 27.8 27.8

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.3 35.2 36.0 35.8

Area of Stack (ft2) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft3

(Actual) 32,113 31,148 31,798 31,686

Flowrate ft3

 (Standard Wet) 25,152 24,337 25,884 25,124

Flowrate ft3

 (Standard Dry) 24,712 23,898 25,336 24,649

Flowrate m3

 (standard dry) 700 677 717 698

Total Hexavalent Chromium Weight (ug)

Hexavalent Chromium 1.68 2.75 52.30 18.91

Total Hexavalent Chromium Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) 3.5E-07 6.0E-07 1.1E-05 3.8E-06

 lb/1000 lb (dry) 3.5E-07 6.0E-07 1.1E-05 3.9E-06

mg/dscm (dry) 4.2E-04 7.2E-04 1.3E-02 4.7E-03

Total Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr 3.9E-05 6.5E-05 1.2E-03 4.4E-04

 lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weight (ug)

Back Half Chromium < 4.00 < 3.00 190.00 65.67

Rinse Chromium 1.00 8.00 31.00 13.33

Total Chromium < 5.00 < 11.00 221.00 79.00

Total Chromium Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.0E-06 < 2.4E-06 4.5E-05 1.6E-05

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 1.0E-06 < 2.4E-06 4.5E-05 1.6E-05

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.3E-03 < 2.9E-03 5.4E-02 1.9E-02

Total Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 1.2E-04 < 2.6E-04 5.2E-03 1.8E-03

 lb/ ton product
Figures 
diameter = 52"

Points Distance "

8 1.7

7 5.5

6 10.1

5 16.8

4 35.2

3 41.9

2 46.5

1 50.3

Figure 1

Site: Sampling Dates:

Johns Manville January 25-26, 2012

Cleburne, Texas

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan

Not to Scale 

 

 > 2 diameter 

 > 8 diameter 
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site: Sampling Dates:

USEPA Method 3A January 24-25, 2012

Johns Manville

Cleburne, Texas

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan

Data Acquisition System 

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip) 

 

Environics Gas 

Dilution System 

M&C Model 100-L 

O2 Analyzer 

CAI Series 600 

CO2 Analyzer 

pump 

tedlar 

bag 
Figure 3

Site: Sampling Dates:USEPA Methods 5/29 January 24-25, 2012Johns ManvilleCleburne, Texas

BT Environmental Consult

4949 Fernlee Avenue Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

Silica gel 

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box 

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple 

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle 

Meter Rig 

Temp. 

ProbeFilter 

On 

Off

-

+

00:00 

1 2 3 4 5 
Figure 4

Site: Sampling Dates:USEPA Method 0061 January 24-25, 2012Johns ManvilleCleburn, Texas

BT Environmental Cons4949 Fernlee AvenueRoyal Oak, Michigan

Meter Rig 

Temp. 

Probe Filter 

On 

Off 

-

+ 

00:00 

1 2 3 4 5 

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel 

Perastaltic pump 

Teflon tee 

75 mL 0.1 N KOH 
Appendix A 

Field and Computer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes 
Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results Summary

Johns Manville - Cleburne, Texas

BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

Sampling Dates: 1/24/12-1/25/12

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Test Run Date 1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012Test Time 8:39-12:38 13:36-17:36 7:31-11:45Oxygen concentration (%) 20.20 20.11 20.15 20.15

Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 7E) 19.85 20.14 20.13 20.04Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.10

Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 7E) 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.12CO2 Correction O2 Corr

1 23 

Co -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 Co 

Cma 10.90 10.90 10.90 Cma 

Cm 10.80 11.15 10.88 Cm 

Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases
Company JM cleburne

Source Designation L91 MBHTest Date 1/24/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 3

Test Number Mtls-Run 1 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 33.6Operator BB Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 25.9Filter Number 11112520 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.20 Leak Rate Initial 0.002@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.002@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.806Pitot Tube Number 51-5-6 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.008Meter Number T6-2 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) - CO2 0.1Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 19.85

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (

1 0 8:35 5 142 0.40 1.23 1.25 609.38 66 66 55 250 254 2 5 5 165 0.42 1.29 1.28 612.94 66 65 49 249 256 3 10 5 157 0.42 1.29 1.28 616.13 66 65 49 250 256 4 15 5 157 0.42 1.29 1.24 619.50 64 63 42 250 256 5 20 4 164 0.39 1.20 1.10 622.70 66 63 42 251 255 6 25 4 165 0.30 0.92 0.90 625.92 66 63 42 250 251 7 30 4 161 0.32 0.98 0.92 628.74 66 63 42 250 251 8 35 4 161 0.30 0.92 0.90 631.51 65 63 41 251 250 9 40 5 161 0.44 1.35 1.30 634.20 65 63 42 251 252 

10 45 4 159 0.35 1.07 1.03 637.45 65 64 42 252 258 11 50 4 166 0.28 0.86 0.83 640.37 64 63 42 251 254 12 55 4 170 0.22 0.67 0.65 643.01 64 63 42 251 255 13 60 4 166 0.25 0.77 0.74 645.32 63 63 48 250 251 14 65 5 170 0.34 1.04 1.00 647.76 65 64 50 247 252 15 70 5 164 0.35 1.07 1.00 650.70 65 64 50 248 252 16 75 4 166 0.35 1.07 1.00 653.61 65 64 49 247 250 17 80 4 167 0.32 0.98 0.95 656.61 65 63 51 248 251 18 85 4 170 0.25 0.77 0.74 659.40 65 64 51 247 250 19 90 5 142 0.43 1.32 1.28 661.99 65 64 50 249 256 20 95 5 132 0.44 1.35 1.32 665.24 65 64 52 249 258 21 100 5 166 0.43 1.32 1.30 668.54 63 63 53 251 257 22 105 5 165 0.44 1.35 1.30 671.75 64 63 54 251 257 23 110 4 169 0.27 0.83 0.80 675.00 64 65 53 250 257 24 115 4 162 0.26 0.80 0.77 677.59 63 65 53 251 258 

120 10:35 679.97

1 120 10:46 4 150 0.26 0.80 0.82 680.09 65 66 56 248 256 2 125 4 165 0.36 1.10 1.10 682.75 65 66 57 250 255 3 130 5 169 0.33 1.01 1.00 685.76 66 66 56 250 254 4 135 5 160 0.30 0.92 0.95 688.70 66 65 57 251 254 5 140 5 170 0.33 1.01 1.05 691.47 66 65 58 252 253 6 145 5 166 0.36 1.10 1.14 694.40 66 65 59 251 254 7 150 5 166 0.39 1.20 1.24 697.43 66 67 60 250 254 8 155 4 168 0.33 1.01 1.00 700.58 65 67 60 251 252 9 160 4 170 0.28 0.86 0.90 703.37 64 66 59 250 252 

10 165 5 170 0.34 1.04 1.08 706.08 66 67 54 250 256 11 170 5 173 0.34 1.04 1.08 709.02 66 66 53 251 256 12 175 4 176 0.26 0.80 0.83 711.92 67 66 54 250 255 13 180 5 169 0.38 1.16 1.20 714.60 67 65 54 251 256 14 185 5 169 0.40 1.23 1.25 717.71 67 66 55 252 254 15 190 5 173 0.36 1.11 1.10 720.80 67 64 53 251 255 16 195 5 162 0.40 1.23 1.20 723.80 66 65 52 250 257 17 200 5 174 0.40 1.23 1.20 727.11 67 65 52 250 257 18 205 5 164 0.50 1.54 1.60 730.26 67 66 53 251 258 19 210 5 165 0.45 1.39 1.44 733.63 67 67 54 251 256 20 215 4 165 0.33 1.02 1.06 737.02 68 67 54 251 254 21 220 4 165 0.30 0.93 0.97 739.96 67 68 54 250 257 22 225 4 165 0.32 0.99 1.00 742.82 67 68 54 254 253 23 230 4 164 0.30 0.93 0.98 745.68 68 68 54 252 254 24 235 5 163 0.44 1.37 1.40 748.46 68 67 54 251 253 

240 12:46 751.65

Average 240 163.9 0.35 1.08 1.07 142.150 65.6 65.0 51.5 250.3 254.4 

65.28
Company JM cleburn

Source Designation L91 MBHTest Date 1/24/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 3Test Number Mtls-Run 2 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 45.8Operator BB Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 24.1Filter Number 11112519 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.10 Leak Rate Initial 0.001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.001@12"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.806

Pitot Tube Number 51-5-6 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.008Meter Number T6-2 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.11

Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20.14

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Exp

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DG

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (cubi

1 0 13:35 4 156 0.33 1.02 1.00 752.80 69 69 62 248 256 7552 5 4 169 0.30 0.93 0.92 755.79 68 69 62 250 257 753 10 4 167 0.35 1.08 1.10 758.60 70 69 61 251 253 764 15 5 169 0.47 1.46 1.45 761.65 70 70 60 252 257 7655 20 5 170 0.45 1.40 1.40 765.15 70 70 60 251 256 766 25 5 171 0.33 1.02 1.00 768.56 71 70 61 251 255 777 30 4 170 0.29 0.90 0.90 771.48 70 70 61 251 257 7748 35 4 173 0.30 0.93 0.93 774.28 71 70 60 252 257 7779 40 5 166 0.50 1.56 1.50 777.05 69 71 61 251 256 780

10 45 5 168 0.48 1.50 1.50 780.61 70 70 57 252 255 78411 50 5 165 0.35 1.09 1.09 784.10 71 70 58 252 253 78712 55 5 164 0.35 1.09 1.09 787.12 71 70 56 251 253 79013 60 4 169 0.30 0.94 0.93 789.99 70 70 55 251 253 79214 65 4 169 0.33 1.03 1.00 792.77 70 71 54 252 253 79515 70 4 165 0.40 1.25 1.25 795.74 70 72 55 251 253 7916 75 5 165 0.41 1.29 1.28 798.95 71 72 56 250 254 80217 80 5 165 0.40 1.26 1.25 802.19 70 72 55 250 251 80518 85 4 165 0.29 0.91 0.91 805.41 69 72 55 251 252 8019 90 4 165 0.30 0.95 0.94 808.15 69 71 55 250 251 81020 95 4 162 0.33 1.04 1.04 810.93 69 71 54 252 249 8121 100 4 161 0.28 0.88 0.88 813.94 68 70 53 251 248 8122 105 4 162 0.29 0.92 0.91 816.64 68 70 55 251 250 81923 110 4 162 0.28 0.89 0.88 819.36 68 70 55 250 256 82224 115 4 161 0.30 0.95 0.95 822.06 69 70 55 251 256 824

120 15:35 824.60

1 120 15:45 4 161 0.35 1.11 1.10 824.91 68 70 56 250 255 8272 125 4 162 0.30 0.95 0.95 827.93 70 71 56 250 255 8303 130 4 161 0.29 0.92 0.92 830.73 69 70 55 251 254 834 135 4 161 0.25 0.80 0.80 833.40 69 71 56 251 254 8355 140 4 161 0.30 0.96 0.96 835.90 68 70 56 250 255 836 145 4 160 0.25 0.80 0.80 838.71 68 70 56 251 253 847 150 4 161 0.39 1.25 1.25 841.30 69 70 56 250 255 8448 155 4 164 0.39 1.25 1.25 844.48 70 71 55 251 253 8479 160 4 167 0.35 1.12 1.12 847.57 70 71 56 254 254 850

10 165 4 170 0.29 0.93 0.93 850.60 70 71 55 250 257 8511 170 4 166 0.29 0.93 0.93 853.34 70 71 55 252 256 8512 175 4 166 0.25 0.80 0.80 856.08 70 71 55 251 256 8513 180 4 179 0.39 1.26 1.25 858.64 71 72 56 252 257 8614 185 5 162 0.45 1.45 1.45 861.82 68 69 57 251 254 86515 190 5 161 0.42 1.36 1.35 865.25 68 68 57 251 254 8616 195 5 160 0.35 1.13 1.13 868.50 67 69 57 254 254 8717 200 4 164 0.32 1.04 1.03 871.52 67 69 57 248 258 87418 205 4 170 0.30 0.97 0.98 874.41 68 67 56 247 255 87719 210 5 161 0.41 1.33 1.30 877.25 68 68 55 248 249 88020 215 4 160 0.35 1.14 1.13 880.51 68 69 56 248 250 8821 220 4 160 0.30 0.98 0.97 883.56 67 68 54 248 252 8822 225 4 161 0.30 0.98 0.97 886.35 67 68 55 250 251 88923 230 4 161 0.31 1.01 1.00 889.14 67 68 55 251 252 8924 235 4 161 0.30 0.98 0.98 892.06 66 68 56 250 252 894

240 17:45 894.95

Average 240 164.6 0.34 1.08 1.07 141.840 69 70 57 251 254 8

69.51
Company JM cleburn

Source Designation L91 MBHTest Date 1/25/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 3Test Number Mtls-Run 3 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 44.7Operator BB Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 27.9Filter Number 11112519 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.10 Leak Rate Initial 0.00@13"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.00@7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.806

Pitot Tube Number 51-5-6 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.008Meter Number T6-2 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.14

Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20.13

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Exp

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DG

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (cubi

1 0 7:30 4 161 0.35 1.10 1.00 906.63 58 57 48 252 252 9092 5 4 137 0.25 0.79 0.77 909.47 57 58 46 253 259 9123 10 5 139 0.35 1.10 1.09 912.05 58 58 45 251 257 9154 15 4 132 0.25 0.79 0.78 915.16 58 58 44 252 259 9175 20 4 138 0.30 0.94 0.94 917.86 58 58 45 251 255 9206 25 5 135 0.47 1.48 1.48 920.70 59 58 44 251 256 9247 30 4 134 0.30 0.94 0.95 924.28 59 58 43 252 259 9278 35 4 141 0.29 0.91 0.92 927.13 59 58 43 252 259 9299 40 4 142 0.29 0.91 0.92 930.00 59 60 44 253 249 932

10 45 4 141 0.33 1.04 1.05 932.74 59 60 43 246 253 93511 50 4 136 0.33 1.04 1.05 935.66 59 60 43 242 259 9312 55 5 137 0.45 1.42 1.43 938.60 59 60 43 241 254 94213 60 4 135 0.26 0.82 0.83 942.06 60 61 44 253 256 94414 65 4 143 0.27 0.85 0.86 944.79 60 61 44 251 258 94715 70 4 146 0.30 0.94 0.96 947.49 60 61 44 251 255 95016 75 4 145 0.30 0.94 0.96 950.20 60 61 44 247 259 95217 80 4 138 0.30 0.94 0.96 952.90 60 62 44 249 254 95518 85 5 138 0.45 1.42 1.44 955.60 60 62 44 249 254 95919 90 5 136 0.34 1.07 1.09 959.00 60 62 44 251 254 9620 95 4 141 0.24 0.76 0.77 962.02 60 62 44 251 256 96421 100 4 131 0.30 0.94 0.97 964.49 60 62 46 252 258 96722 105 4 140 0.24 0.76 0.77 967.32 60 61 45 252 257 96923 110 5 135 0.40 1.26 1.29 969.87 60 61 45 251 253 9724 115 5 137 0.45 1.42 1.46 973.12 59 61 46 249 254 97

120 9:30 976.52

1 120 9:43 5 140 0.35 1.10 1.10 976.95 60 61 44 245 263 9792 125 5 136 0.32 1.01 1.00 979.95 60 61 43 244 262 9823 130 5 137 0.45 1.42 1.45 982.91 60 59 44 250 257 984 135 5 137 0.45 1.42 1.46 986.34 59 61 46 251 253 9895 140 4 144 0.28 0.88 0.91 989.55 59 61 46 248 255 9926 145 4 144 0.28 0.88 0.91 992.36 59 61 46 253 258 9957 150 4 135 0.32 1.01 1.04 995.11 60 61 46 249 257 998 155 4 145 0.30 0.94 0.98 997.90 60 61 47 254 256 1009 160 5 140 0.50 1.57 1.64 1000.70 60 61 49 252 256 100

10 165 5 141 0.48 1.51 1.57 1004.15 60 62 52 250 259 10011 170 4 144 0.31 0.98 1.02 1007.78 60 62 54 251 261 10112 175 4 149 0.28 0.88 0.92 1010.70 61 62 55 253 256 10113 180 5 139 0.33 1.04 1.08 1013.45 61 62 55 251 252 10114 185 5 148 0.33 1.04 1.08 1016.23 61 62 55 252 255 10115 190 5 143 0.48 1.51 1.58 1019.15 61 63 55 252 257 10216 195 5 143 0.40 1.26 1.32 1022.76 61 63 57 252 252 10217 200 5 147 0.30 0.95 0.99 1026.01 61 63 59 252 255 10218 205 5 153 0.29 0.92 0.96 1028.98 61 63 60 252 254 10319 210 5 137 0.35 1.11 1.16 1031.72 61 63 59 251 255 10320 215 5 154 0.28 0.89 0.93 1034.76 61 63 60 251 258 10321 220 5 146 0.45 1.43 1.49 1037.56 62 63 60 251 257 10422 225 5 149 0.44 1.40 1.46 1041.06 62 63 60 252 259 10423 230 5 154 0.30 0.96 0.99 1044.55 62 64 62 252 257 10424 235 5 158 0.28 0.89 0.93 1047.50 62 64 63 249 259 105

240 11:43 1050.19

Average 240 141.7 0.34 1.07 1.10 143.130 59.9 61.0 48.8 250.4 256.3 97

60.46
Company Johns Mansville Cleburne

Source Designation L91-MBHTest Date 1/24/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2

Test Number 0061-Run 1 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 10.4Operator M. Gillen Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 42.8Filter Number NA Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.20 Leak Rate Initial 0.003@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.005@18"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.808Pitot Tube Number T6-5-2 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 0.994Meter Number 51-4 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.5Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box E

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperatu

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 8:35 5 161 0.39 1.15 1.25 930.58 59 63 60 NA NA NA 2 5 8:40 5 161 0.46 1.36 1.40 933.68 59 63 60 NA NA NA 3 10 8:45 5 158 0.45 1.33 1.40 937.09 59 63 62 NA NA NA 4 15 8:50 5 151 0.42 1.24 1.30 940.27 59 63 66 NA NA NA 5 20 8:55 5 167 0.28 0.83 0.87 943.51 59 62 64 NA NA NA 6 25 9:00 5.5 157 0.30 0.88 0.94 947.09 60 62 62 NA NA NA 7 30 9:05 5 168 0.32 0.94 1.00 950.62 60 62 59 NA NA NA 8 35 9:10 5 163 0.40 1.18 1.25 952.14 60 62 57 NA NA NA 9 40 9:15 5 161 0.41 1.21 1.30 955.02 60 62 57 NA NA NA 

10 45 9:20 5 161 0.28 0.83 0.88 957.92 60 61 56 NA NA NA 11 50 9:25 5 168 0.24 0.71 0.75 961.32 60 61 57 NA NA NA 12 55 9:30 5 164 0.27 0.80 0.85 964.31 60 61 57 NA NA NA 13 60 9:35 5 168 0.25 0.74 0.79 967.82 60 61 60 NA NA NA 14 65 9:40 4 173 0.35 1.03 1.10 970.86 60 61 57 NA NA NA 15 70 9:45 4 167 0.40 1.18 1.25 973.27 60 61 57 NA NA NA 16 75 9:50 4 167 0.42 1.24 1.30 976.30 60 61 57 NA NA NA 17 80 9:55 5 170 0.32 0.94 1.00 979.39 60 61 57 NA NA NA 18 85 10:00 5 173 0.30 0.88 0.90 982.16 60 61 58 NA NA NA 19 90 10:05 5 169 0.30 0.88 0.90 984.91 60 61 57 NA NA NA 20 95 10:10 4.5 172 0.40 1.18 1.20 987.62 61 61 57 NA NA NA 21 100 10:15 4.5 164 0.36 1.06 1.10 990.72 61 61 58 NA NA NA 22 105 10:20 4.5 164 0.45 1.33 1.35 993.68 61 61 58 NA NA NA 23 110 10:25 5 167 0.28 0.83 0.85 997.02 61 61 58 NA NA NA 24 115 10:30 4.5 171 0.30 0.88 0.90 999.61 61 61 58 NA NA NA 

120 10:30 1002.38

1 120 10:46 4 163 0.31 0.91 0.94 1002.73 62 62 53 NA NA NA 2 125 10:51 4 169 0.29 0.86 0.88 1005.48 62 62 54 NA NA NA 3 130 10:56 4 173 0.28 0.83 0.85 1008.22 62 62 54 NA NA NA 4 135 11:01 4 176 0.34 1.00 1.05 1010.82 62 62 55 NA NA NA 5 140 11:06 4 173 0.30 0.88 0.92 1013.70 63 62 56 NA NA NA 6 145 11:11 4.5 176 0.45 1.33 1.40 1016.49 63 63 57 NA NA NA 7 150 11:16 5 171 0.47 1.39 1.45 1019.82 63 63 58 NA NA NA 8 155 11:21 5 171 0.30 0.88 0.92 1023.20 63 63 60 NA NA NA 9 160 11:26 5 176 0.28 0.83 0.86 1025.91 63 63 61 NA NA NA 

10 165 11:31 5 175 0.37 1.09 1.15 1028.56 64 63 61 NA NA NA 11 170 11:36 4.5 174 0.32 0.94 0.98 1031.61 64 63 61 NA NA NA 12 175 11:41 4.5 178 0.49 1.45 1.50 1034.38 64 64 61 NA NA NA 13 180 11:46 5 171 0.38 1.12 1.20 1037.82 64 64 63 NA NA NA 14 185 11:51 4.5 170 0.36 1.06 1.10 1041.01 64 64 65 NA NA NA 15 190 11:56 4.5 174 0.28 0.83 0.86 1044.01 64 64 60 NA NA NA 16 195 12:01 4.5 163 0.36 1.07 1.10 1046.68 64 64 58 NA NA NA 17 200 12:06 4 174 0.29 0.86 0.90 1049.72 64 64 57 NA NA NA 18 205 12:11 4 178 0.47 1.39 1.45 1052.43 64 64 56 NA NA NA 19 210 12:16 5 169 0.45 1.34 1.40 1055.76 65 65 56 NA NA NA 20 215 12:21 5 170 0.45 1.34 1.40 1059.11 65 65 56 NA NA NA 21 220 12:26 4 173 0.30 0.89 0.93 1062.49 65 65 56 NA NA NA 22 225 12:31 4.5 162 0.35 1.04 1.10 1065.23 65 65 54 NA NA NA 23 230 12:36 4.5 173 0.30 0.90 0.93 1068.18 65 65 55 NA NA NA 24 235 12:41 5 167 0.52 1.55 1.60 1070.91 65 65 55 NA NA NA 

240 12:46 1074.23

Average 240 168.4 0.36 1.05 1.10 143.303 61.9 62.6 58.1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

62.21
Company JM- Cleaburn

Source Designation L91-MBHTest Date 1/24/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2Test Number 0061-Run 2 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 12.3Operator M.Gillen Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 40.2Filter Number NA Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.10 Leak Rate Initial 0.006@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.004@13"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.808

Pitot Tube Number T6-5-2 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 0.994Meter Number 51-4 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.5

Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 13:35 9 170 0.28 0.83 0.83 76.72 66 67 62 NA NA NA 2 5 13:40 9 176 0.26 0.77 0.77 79.42 66 67 58 NA NA NA 3 10 13:45 10 169 0.32 0.95 0.95 81.97 66 67 57 NA NA NA 4 15 13:50 10 169 0.46 1.37 1.35 84.78 66 67 57 NA NA NA 5 20 13:55 10 172 0.28 0.84 0.83 88.11 66 67 58 NA NA NA 6 25 14:00 10 174 0.26 0.78 0.77 90.76 67 67 60 NA NA NA 7 30 14:05 10 168 0.27 0.81 0.81 93.21 67 67 62 NA NA NA 8 35 14:10 10 176 0.30 0.90 0.89 95.82 67 68 60 NA NA NA 9 40 14:15 10 169 0.42 1.26 1.25 98.63 67 68 55 NA NA NA 

10 45 14:20 10 169 0.47 1.41 1.40 101.81 67 68 55 NA NA NA 11 50 14:25 10 173 0.32 0.96 0.96 105.12 67 68 55 NA NA NA 12 55 14:30 10 175 0.35 1.05 1.05 107.89 67 68 56 NA NA NA 13 60 14:35 10 168 0.32 0.97 0.96 110.82 67 68 58 NA NA NA 14 65 14:40 10 175 0.28 0.85 0.84 113.66 67 68 58 NA NA NA 15 70 14:45 10 166 0.36 1.09 1.10 116.20 67 68 55 NA NA NA 16 75 14:50 10 167 0.49 1.48 1.50 119.24 66 68 55 NA NA NA 17 80 14:55 10 171 0.30 0.91 0.90 122.76 66 68 55 NA NA NA 18 85 15:00 10 172 0.38 1.15 1.15 125.55 66 68 57 NA NA NA 19 90 15:05 10 167 0.30 0.91 0.91 128.58 66 68 57 NA NA NA 20 95 15:10 10 170 0.31 0.94 0.94 131.34 66 68 55 NA NA NA 21 100 15:15 10 166 0.47 1.43 1.40 134.11 66 68 55 NA NA NA 22 105 15:20 10 168 0.49 1.49 1.50 137.62 66 68 55 NA NA NA 23 110 15:25 10 172 0.29 0.89 0.88 141.09 66 67 57 NA NA NA 24 115 15:30 10 175 0.24 0.73 0.73 143.91 66 67 56 NA NA NA 

120 15:35 146.47

1 120 15:45 10 155 0.31 0.95 0.95 147.13 66 67 54 NA NA NA 2 125 15:50 10 161 0.43 1.32 1.30 149.78 66 67 52 NA NA NA 3 130 15:55 10 159 0.26 0.80 0.80 153.10 65 67 49 NA NA NA 4 135 16:00 10 157 0.32 0.98 0.98 155.79 65 67 48 NA NA NA 5 140 16:05 10 165 0.28 0.86 0.86 158.62 65 67 50 NA NA NA 6 145 16:10 10 170 0.29 0.89 0.89 161.29 65 67 50 NA NA NA 7 150 16:15 10 166 0.39 1.20 1.20 164.08 65 67 50 NA NA NA 8 155 16:20 10 165 0.47 1.45 1.45 167.29 65 67 50 NA NA NA 9 160 16:25 10 170 0.31 0.96 0.96 170.72 65 66 51 NA NA NA 

10 165 16:30 10 173 0.29 0.90 0.90 173.50 65 66 52 NA NA NA 11 170 16:35 10 169 0.31 0.96 0.96 176.19 65 66 55 NA NA NA 12 175 16:40 10 165 0.42 1.30 1.30 179.01 65 66 55 NA NA NA 13 180 16:45 10 162 0.28 0.87 0.87 182.20 64 66 56 NA NA NA 14 185 16:50 10 164 0.43 1.34 1.35 184.90 64 66 56 NA NA NA 15 190 16:55 10 165 0.26 0.81 0.81 188.21 64 66 58 NA NA NA 16 195 17:00 10 167 0.29 0.90 0.90 190.78 63 65 58 NA NA NA 17 200 17:05 10 166 0.26 0.81 0.81 193.52 63 65 57 NA NA NA 18 205 17:10 10 172 0.29 0.91 0.90 196.13 63 65 58 NA NA NA 19 210 17:15 10 165 0.37 1.16 1.15 198.86 63 65 56 NA NA NA 20 215 17:20 10 163 0.29 0.91 0.91 201.88 63 65 56 NA NA NA 21 220 17:25 10 163 0.31 0.97 0.97 204.63 63 65 55 NA NA NA 22 225 17:30 10 166 0.32 1.00 1.00 207.41 63 65 55 NA NA NA 23 230 17:35 10 161 0.29 0.91 0.91 210.28 63 65 54 NA NA NA 24 235 17:40 10 163 0.32 1.01 1.00 213.04 63 65 55 NA NA NA 

240 17:45 215.94

Average 240 167.7 0.33 1.02 1.02 138.565 65 67 55 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

66.05
Company JM- Cleaburn

Source Designation L91-MBHTest Date 1/25/2012 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2Test Number 0061-Run 3 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 27.5Operator M.Gillen Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 38.6Filter Number NA Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb) 29.10 Leak Rate Initial 0.002@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -17.8 Leak Rate Final 0.003@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 52 Traverse points 16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.808

Pitot Tube Number T6-5-2 Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 0.994Meter Number 51-4 Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.1

Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20.2

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 7:30 6 136 0.28 0.85 0.86 238.80 54 57 49 NA NA NA 2 5 7:35 5 139 0.26 0.79 0.80 241.46 54 57 47 NA NA NA 3 10 7:40 5 131 0.33 1.01 1.00 244.08 55 57 47 NA NA NA 4 15 7:45 5 132 0.39 1.19 1.20 247.06 55 57 47 NA NA NA 5 20 7:50 5 134 0.32 0.98 0.99 250.27 55 57 48 NA NA NA 6 25 7:55 5 137 0.39 1.19 1.20 253.11 55 57 48 NA NA NA 7 30 8:00 5 135 0.28 0.85 0.87 256.24 55 57 49 NA NA NA 8 35 8:05 5 137 0.27 0.82 0.84 258.90 55 57 50 NA NA NA 9 40 8:10 5 139 0.34 1.04 1.05 261.52 55 57 50 NA NA NA 

10 45 8:15 5 132 0.28 0.85 0.87 264.44 56 57 49 NA NA NA 11 50 8:20 6 146 0.37 1.13 1.15 267.13 56 57 50 NA NA NA 12 55 8:25 6 139 0.44 1.34 1.35 270.17 56 58 50 NA NA NA 13 60 8:30 6 138 0.40 1.22 1.25 273.51 56 58 52 NA NA NA 14 65 8:35 6 144 0.31 0.95 0.96 276.75 56 58 50 NA NA NA 15 70 8:40 6 147 0.36 1.10 1.10 279.51 56 58 50 NA NA NA 16 75 8:45 6.5 144 0.34 1.04 1.05 282.59 57 58 50 NA NA NA 17 80 8:50 6.5 137 0.42 1.28 1.30 285.54 57 58 50 NA NA NA 18 85 8:55 6.5 138 0.51 1.56 1.60 288.91 57 58 52 NA NA NA 19 90 9:00 6.5 137 0.35 1.07 1.10 292.58 56 58 53 NA NA NA 20 95 9:05 6.5 142 0.31 0.95 0.97 295.63 56 28 52 NA NA NA 21 100 9:10 6 142 0.30 0.92 0.94 298.35 56 58 51 NA NA NA 22 105 9:15 6 138 0.31 0.95 0.97 301.15 56 58 51 NA NA NA 23 110 9:20 6 136 0.54 1.65 1.70 304.01 57 58 51 NA NA NA 24 115 9:25 6.5 137 0.51 1.56 1.60 307.74 57 58 51 NA NA NA 

120 9:30 311.36

1 120 9:43 6.5 138 0.27 0.82 0.85 311.91 59 59 49 NA NA NA 2 125 9:48 5 148 0.28 0.85 0.88 314.49 58 59 50 NA NA NA 3 130 9:53 6 141 0.51 1.56 1.60 317.21 58 59 50 NA NA NA 4 135 9:58 6 143 0.46 1.40 1.45 320.82 59 60 53 NA NA NA 5 140 10:03 6 148 0.28 0.85 0.88 324.29 59 60 53 NA NA NA 6 145 10:08 6 150 0.27 0.82 0.85 326.97 59 60 54 NA NA NA 7 150 10:13 6 140 0.28 0.85 0.89 329.64 59 60 53 NA NA NA 8 155 10:18 6 149 0.26 0.79 0.82 332.31 59 60 54 NA NA NA 9 160 10:23 5 143 0.47 1.43 1.50 334.92 60 61 54 NA NA NA 

10 165 10:28 6 143 0.48 1.47 1.50 338.51 60 61 55 NA NA NA 11 170 10:33 6.5 148 0.30 0.92 0.95 341.98 60 61 56 NA NA NA 12 175 10:38 6 152 0.28 0.85 0.89 344.79 61 62 55 NA NA NA 13 180 10:43 6 147 0.32 0.98 1.00 347.51 61 62 55 NA NA NA 14 185 10:48 6 151 0.29 0.89 0.92 350.41 61 62 55 NA NA NA 15 190 10:53 6 142 0.52 1.59 1.65 353.20 61 62 55 NA NA NA 16 195 10:58 6 145 0.51 1.56 1.65 356.88 61 62 56 NA NA NA 17 200 11:03 6 145 0.32 0.98 1.00 360.50 61 62 57 NA NA NA 18 205 11:08 6 145 0.38 1.17 1.20 363.44 62 63 57 NA NA NA 19 210 11:13 6 145 0.35 1.08 1.10 366.63 62 63 58 NA NA NA 20 215 11:18 6 150 0.36 1.11 1.15 369.60 61 63 57 NA NA NA 21 220 11:23 6 148 0.50 1.54 1.60 372.66 61 63 58 NA NA NA 22 225 11:28 6 150 0.46 1.42 1.50 376.28 61 63 58 NA NA NA 23 230 11:33 6 153 0.33 1.02 1.05 379.70 61 63 58 NA NA NA 24 235 11:38 6.5 159 0.29 0.90 0.93 382.61 61 63 58 NA NA NA 

240 11:43 385.33

Average 240 142.5 0.36 1.11 1.14 145.981 58.0 58.8 52.4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

58.41






















Appendix B 

 Process Data 
Appendix C 

Equipment Calibration Documents 

























Appendix D 

Laboratory Analytical Results 
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight 

(mg)

Run 1 92 4.0 0.06 4.0 4.3

Run 2 82 1.7 0.06 1.7 2.0

Run 3 89 5.7 0.06 5.7 6.0

Blank 72 0.2 0.06

Note: Run detection limits of 0.3 mg on the filter were used in placeof the corrected values listed above

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Corrected

Sampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012

BTEC job #11-4191.02

Cleburne, Texas

Johns Manville
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Blank 

Filter 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Filter 

blank 

Correction

Acetone 

Blank 

Correction

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 1.16 0.15 3.15 1.76 2.76 0.15 1.16 0.00 

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 1.46 0.30 1.64 1.85 2.17 0.60 1.46 0.00 

Note: For Runs 1 and 2, the test run detection limit of 0.6 μg was used for the front half result.

Johns Manville

Method 29 Lab Results

Sampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012

BTEC job #11-4191.02

Cleburne, Texas
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Run 1 815 615 2.30 0.30 1.68Run 2 739 549 3.30 0.30 2.75Run 3 854 694 53.00 2.00 52.30

Blank KOH 299 0.30 0.20

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger 

KOH (ml)

Back Half 

Chromium 

(μg)

Back Half 

RDL

Rinse 

Chromium 

(μg)

Rins

RDL

Run 1 815 615 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 

Run 2 739 549 2.00 3.00 8.00 1.00 

Run 3 854 694 190.00 4.00 31.00 0.90 

Blank KOH 299 1.00 2.00 0.50 1.00

Method 0061 Lab Results

Sampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012

BTEC job #11-4191.02

Cleburne, Texas

Johns Manville
Your Project #: 12-41 

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/08

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B212459

Received: 2012/01/26, 12:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) 4 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 BRL SOP-00103 / BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) 4 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) 4 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) 4 N/A 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00109 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M I 9 8 8 1 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 3 M I 9 8 8 4

Sampling Date 2012/01/25 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/25

14:10 14:10

 U n i t s FIELD RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.2 J 4.0 1.7 2.0 0.5 2748217

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.30 2748215

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 72 92 82 89 1 2748218

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M I 9 8 8 1 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 3 M I 9 8 8 4

Sampling Date 2012/01/25 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/25

14:10 14:10 14:10

 U n i t s FIELD RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 1-M5/29 Lab-Dup 3-M5/29

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.16 0.15 3.15 3.18 1.76 2.76 0.15 2753940

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.46 0.30 1.64 1.60 1.85 2.17 0.60 2756471

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9881 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID FIELD BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9882 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9882 D u p Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Maxxam ID MI9883 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9884 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201): Sample MI9882-02 is oily in appearance.

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020): Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MI9882.

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except MI9881, due to the matrix

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MI9882.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 12-41

P.O. #: 

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB212459

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2748217 RSU Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2012/02/06 0.1 J, MDL=0.1 mg

2753940 N_R Matrix Spike

(MI9882) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9882) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 2.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.4 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.113 J, MDL=0.070 ug

Method Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.099 J, MDL=0.070 ug

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 1.1 % 20

2756471 N_R Matrix Spike

(MI9882) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9882) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 103 % 85 - 115

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.7 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 7
Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B212459

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager 

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 7 of 7
Your Project #: 12-41 

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/08

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B212412

Received: 2012/01/26, 12:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Chromium in Impinger by ICP 5 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061 

SOP-00102

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP 4 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061 

SOP-00102

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2012/02/01 

Final Volume of Train Rinse 4 N/A 2012/02/01 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 7 8 M I 9 4 7 9 M I 9 4 8 0 M I 9 4 8 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

17:30 17:30 15:50 15:50

 U n i t s BLANK-M0061 BLANK RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 Lab-Dup

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 299 413 1 615 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 240 1 200 1 2751517

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.3 0.03 U 0.2 2.3 2.3 0.3 2752200

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 8 1 M I 9 4 8 2

Sampling Date 2012/01/24

19:25

 U n i t s RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 549 1 694 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 190 1 160 1 2751517

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 3.3 0.3 53 2 2752200

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

ELEMENTS BY ICP-AES (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 7 8 M I 9 4 7 9 M I 9 4 8 0 M I 9 4 8 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

17:30 17:30 15:50 15:50

 U n i t s BLANK-M0061 BLANK RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 1 U 2 2 U 2 U 4 2751507

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 0.5 U 1 1 1 1 2751508

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 8 1 M I 9 4 8 2

Sampling Date 2012/01/24

19:25

 U n i t s RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 2 J 3 190 4 2751507

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 8 1 31 0.9 2751508

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9478 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID BLANK-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9479 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID BLANK H20-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9480 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9480 D u p Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Maxxam ID MI9481 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9482 Collected

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 12-41

P.O. #: 

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB212412

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2751507 SUK Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 95 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9480) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 95 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/02 100 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 100 % 90 - 110

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.2 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 NC % 20

2751508 SUK Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 102 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9480) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 103 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 100 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 102 % 90 - 110

RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 1.1 % 20

Method Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 NC % 20

2752200 LLE Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 103 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 98 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 0.03 U, MDL=0.03 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 3.6 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 8
Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B212412

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager 

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 8 of 8