### 5781 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices

1 This and the subsequent notices mentioned in this notice, as well as comments received, supporting and related materials, and other documents can be viewed at http:// www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/ main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS–2007–0044. of § 340.6 describe the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status must take and the information that must be included in the petition.

In a notice published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2005 (70 FR 36917– 36919, Docket No. 04–085–3), APHIS advised the public of its determination, effective June 14, 2005, that the Monsanto and Forage Genetics International GE glyphosate-tolerant alfalfa lines designated as events J101 and J163 were no longer considered regulated articles under the regulations governing the introduction of certain GE organisms. That determination was subsequently challenged in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by the Center for Food Safety, other associations, and several organic alfalfa growers. The lawsuit alleged that APHIS’ decision to deregulate the GE alfalfa events J101 and J163 violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act, and the Plant Protection Act.

On February 13, 2007, the court in that case issued its memorandum and order in which it determined that APHIS had violated NEPA by not preparing an EIS in connection with its deregulation determination. The court ruled that the environmental assessment prepared by APHIS for its deregulation determination failed to adequately consider certain environmental impacts in violation of NEPA. The deregulation determination was vacated and APHIS was directed by the court to prepare an EIS in connection with making a new determination on the regulated status of the GE alfalfa.

On December 18, 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register (74 FR 67206–67207, Docket No. ER–FRL–8986–6) announcing the availability of a draft EIS in connection with making a determination on the regulated status of the GE alfalfa. Comments on the draft EIS were to have been received on or before February 16, 2010. APHIS subsequently published a notice 1 in the Federal Register on February 24, 2010 (75 FR 8299–8300, Docket No. APHIS–2007–0044), extending the comment period through March 3, 2010.

In December 2010, APHIS published and distributed the final EIS, which included discussion of the public comments received on the draft EIS. On December 23, 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register (75 FR 80807– 80808, Docket No. ER–FRL–8994–3) announcing the availability of the final EIS. The NEPA implementing regulations in 40 CFR 1506.10 require a 30-day review period between the time a final EIS is published and the time an agency makes a decision on an action covered by the EIS. APHIS received more than 16,000 comments on the final EIS by the time this review period ended on January 24, 2011.

APHIS has reviewed the final EIS and has concluded that it has fully analyzed the issues covered by the draft EIS and those comments and suggestions submitted by commenters. APHIS has now prepared a record of decision based on the final EIS and is making that record available to the public. The record of decision and the final EIS on which the record of decision is based may be viewed on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/ component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2007-0044. Copies of those documents may also be obtained from the person listed under **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
**CONTACT**

.

The record of decision has been prepared in accordance with: (1) NEPA, (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).

Done in Washington, DC, this January 27,
2011. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–2268 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**Forest Service**

**Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Resource Advisory Committee** 

**AGENCY :**  Forest Service, USDA.

**ACTION :**  Notice of meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  The Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah. The committee is meeting as authorized under the SecureRural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose is to continue the review of project submittals.

**DATES :**  The meeting will be held on February 17, 2011, from 3 p.m. to 5:30
p.m.
**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Salt Lake County Government Center, Room S1002, 2001 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. Written comments should be sent to Loyal Clark, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601. Comments may also be sent via e-mail
to lfclark@fs.fed.us, via facsimile to
801–342–5144.

All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for inspection and copying. The public mayinspect comments received at the UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest, 88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Loyal Clark, RAC Coordinator, USDA, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601; 801–342–5117; lfclark@fs.fed.us.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The meeting is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) review Forest Service project approval letter, and (2) review new proposals. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.

Dated: January 21, 2011. Cheryl Probert, Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–2163 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P**

**COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS**

**Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory Committee** 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of the Texas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by conference call at 10 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 12 noon on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2300 E. University Drive, Denton, TX, 76206. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Committee’s civil rights project on human trafficking.

Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the


### 5782 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2011 / Notices

comments must be received in the regional office by March 23, 2011. The address is 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, California 90012. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments or who desire additional information should contact Angelica Trevino, Administrative Assistant, at (213) 894–3437 or (800) 877–8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail to: atrevino@usccr.gov.

Hearing-impaired persons who wish to submit written comments and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission’s Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact theWestern Regional Office at the above email or street address.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, January 27,
2011. Peter Minarik, Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011–2213 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6335–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Title: Tag Recapture Card. OMB Control Number: 0648–0259. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission. Number of Respondents: 240. Average Hours per Response: 2 minutes.

Burden Hours: 8. Needs and Uses: This request is for the renewal of a currently approved information collection. The Cooperative Game Fish Tagging Program (CGFTP) was initiated in 1954 by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). In 1973 the CGFTP became a cooperative effort between WHOI and the National Marine Fisheries (NMFS) as part of a comprehensive research program resulting from passage of the Migratory Game Fish Study Act of 1959 (Pub. L. 86–359) and other legislative acts under which the NMFS operates. In 1980 sole control of the CGFTP was handed over to the NMFS. The CGFTP was later renamed the Cooperative Tagging Center (CTC). The CTC attempts to determine the migratory patterns and other biological information of billfish, tunas, and swordfish by having fishermen tag and release their catch, so that fish can be subsequently recaptured.

The primary objectives of a tagging program are to obtain scientific information on fish growth and movements necessary to assist in stock assessment and management. This is accomplished by the random recapture of tagged fish by fishermen and the subsequent voluntary submission of the appropriate data.

Affected Public: Individuals or households.

Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. OMB Desk Officer: OIRA

_ Submission@omb.eop.gov.

Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov ).

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA

_ Submission@omb.eop.gov.

Dated: January 28, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–2232 Filed 2–1–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE** 

**International Trade Administration**

**[A–122–853]**

**Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Preliminary Results of**  **Antidumping Duty Administrative Review** 

**AGENCY :**  Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

**SUMMARY :**  In response to a timely request by one manufacturer/exporter, Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (JBL Canada), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Canada with respect to JBL Canada. The review covers the period November 20, 2008, through May 19, 2009, and May 29, 2009, through April 30, 2010. We preliminarily determine that JBL Canada made sales below normal value (NV).

If the preliminary results are adopted in our final results of the administrative review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 4929, respectively.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

In response to a timely request by JBL Canada, on June 30, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid from Canada with respect to JBL Canada covering the period November 20, 2008, through May 19, 2009, and May 29, 2009, through April 30, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010).

Also on June 30, 2010, we issued the antidumping duty questionnaire to JBL Canada. In August 2010, we received responses to sections A (i.e., the section covering general information about the company), B (i.e., the section covering comparison-market sales), C ( i.e., the section covering U.S. sales), and D (the