alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 8/8/2014

Sample Number: 142596-001 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 09:10 Date Received: 7/22/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 286000 ng/L 10000 4000 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-002 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 09:03 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 202 ng/L 20 8 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-003 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 09:07 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 174 ng/L 20 8 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-004 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 08:55 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 16.8 ng/L 5 2 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-005 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 08:57 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 22.8 ng/L 5 2 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-006 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 09:00 Date Received: 7/22/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 21.2 ng/L 5 2 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-007 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 08:28 Date Received: 7/22/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 29.5 ng/L 10 4 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 142596 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 8/8/2014

Sample Number: 142596-008 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 08:28 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 3.1 ng/L 1 0.4 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142596-009 Date Collected: 07/22/2014 08:19 Date Received: 7/22/2014

Clearwater Pond at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 4.3 ng/L 2 0.8 JAB 08/01/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Dave Conover, Senior Chemist

Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 142596 Page 2 of 2
#### Baker, Appellant, vs. Onsrud and another, Respondents.

*March 15*—

April *12, 1938.*

*452For the appellant there was a brief by *Darrell MacIntyre,*and oral argument by *Mr. MacIntyre*and *Mr. I. Philip Koberstein,*both of Madison.

*Alvin M. Loverud*of Stoughton, for the respondents.

Nelson, J.

Upon the motions made, after the coming in of the verdict, the court was of the opinion that the amount of the damages which the jury found the plaintiff had sustained as a result of the assault and battery committed upon him by the defendant, Lawrence Onsrud, was excessive and was not sustained by the evidence. The court thereupon, in pursuance of the established law of this state, ordered that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiff should elect to remit the excess of the damages found and consent to take judgment for the least amount that an unprejudiced jury, properly instructed, would probably find, or unless the defendant should elect to permit judgment to go against him for the highest amount that an unprejudiced jury, properly instructed, would probably find. *Baxter v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.*104 Wis. 307, 80 N. W. 644; *Heimlich v. Tabor,*123 Wis. 565, 102 N. W. 10; *Campbell v. Sutliff,*193 Wis. 370, 214 N. W. 374; *Risch v. Lawhead,*211 Wis. 270, 248 N. W. 127; *Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co.*221 Wis. 628, 267 N. W. 292. A new trial was not in fact granted, *453since the defendant, Lawrence Onsrud, in pursuance of the option given him, elected that judgment might be taken against him for $350.

The plaintiff’s appeal is grounded upon the assertion that a new trial was granted. Although an order which grants a new trial is appealable, sec. 274.33 (3), Stats., no such order was made. Judgment should have been entered on the conditional order of the court when the defendant, Lawrence Onsrud, elected to have judgment entered against him before the appeal was taken. Unless an appeal is authorized by statute, no appeal lies. *Witt v. Wonser,*195 Wis. 593, 219 N. W. 344; *Baxter v. Sleeman,*196 Wis. 562, 221 N. W. 382; *Appleton v. Greenspon,*202 Wis. 322, 232 N. W. 598; *Manns v. Marinette & M. P. Co.*205 Wis. 349, 235 N. W. 426, 238 N. W. 624; *First Wisconsin Nat. Bank v. Carpenter,*218 Wis. 30, 259 N. W. 836. There is no statute which permits an appeal to this court from an order like the one here. An appeal from an order which is nonap-pealable confers upon this court no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal, even though the parties consent that this court take jurisdiction, *Hyde v. German Nat. Bank,*96 Wis. 406, 71 N. W. 659; *Estate of Fish,*200 Wis. 61, 227 N. W. 272; *Gilbert v. Hoard,*201 Wis. 572, 230 N. W. 720; *Paraffine Companies v. Kipp,*219 Wis. 419, 263 N. W. 84, or the respondent fails to. raise objection to the appellant’s right to appeal. No jurisdiction is conferred upon this court to pass upon the merits, if there is in fact no right of appeal. *Richter v. Standard Mfg. Co.*224 Wis. 121, 271 N. W. 14, 271 N. W. 914.

Since no appealable order is before us, we can only dismiss the appeal.

*By the Court.*— The appeal is dismissed.
In the Senate of the United States, 

May 24, 2017. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1238) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the Homeland 

Security Act of 2002 to make the Assistant Secretary of 

Homeland Security for Health Affairs responsible for coordinating the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security 

related to food, agriculture, and veterinary defense against 

terrorism, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 4, lines 1 and 2, strike ørelating to food and 

2 agriculture¿ and insert ‘‘or the Secretary of Health and 

3 Human Services’’. 

4 Ω2æOn page 4, strike line 3 and all that follows through 

5 the end of the matter following line 6 and insert the fol6 lowing: 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in 

8 section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is 

9 amended— 
2 

† HR 1238 EAS 

1 (1) by striking the items relating to sections 523, 

2 524, 525, 526, and 527; and 

3 (2) by inserting after the item relating to section 

4 522 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 523. Guidance and recommendations. 

‘‘Sec. 524. Voluntary private sector preparedness accreditation and certification 

program. 

‘‘Sec. 525. Acceptance of gifts. 

‘‘Sec. 526. Integrated public alert and warning system modernization. 

‘‘Sec. 527. National planning and education. 

‘‘Sec. 528. Coordination of Department of Homeland Security efforts related to 

food, agriculture, and veterinary defense against terrorism.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 1238 

AMENDMENTS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20016

QUALITY INFUSION CARE INC

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-2929

Before Reavley, Smith, and Garza, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Quality Infusion Care, Inc. brought suit under the

Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.

against Aetna Life Ins. Co. Quality contends that Aetna wrongfully denied

claims for benefits related to services performed by Quality for R.A., who was

indisputably covered under the employee welfare benefits plan funded by a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20016

1 R.A. assigned his rights, benefits, and claims under the plan to Quality, including the

right to receive payments for benefits. Aetna does not challenge Quality’s status as a valid

assignee.

2

group insurance policy issued by Aetna.1 Quality appeals the district court’s

grant of summary judgment to Aetna. For the following reasons, we affirm the

district court’s judgment.

1. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.

Texas Indus., Inc. v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co., 486 F.3d 844, 846 (5th

Cir. 2007). Summary judgment is appropriate if the record shows

“that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the

moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” FED. R.

CIV. P. 56(c). 

2. Quality alleges that summary judgment to Aetna is improper

because Aetna ignored medical information submitted by Quality

and because Aetna’s reviewing nurses and physicians were not

qualified to determine whether treatment Quality provided to R.A.

was medically necessary. 

Quality’s arguments fail. Aetna did not ignore the medical

information submitted by Quality. It merely relied on its prepublished clinical policy specifying when intravenous

immunoglobulin (“IVIG”) treatments are considered medically

necessary and determined that the criteria was not met. We have

held that an insurer’s reliance on a pre-published plan to determine

what is “medically necessary” can be reasonable under ERISA.

Dowden v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc., 126 F.3d 641,

644 (5th Cir. 1997). And, contrary to Quality’s contention, Aetna

accurately followed its pre-published policy, Aetna Clinical Policy

Bulletin 206 (“CPB 206”), when denying Quality’s request that it
No. 07-20016

3

cover the IVIG services provided to R.A. CPB 206 plainly precludes

coverage for R.A.’s treatments, so we find no merit to Quality’s

contention that Aetna’s reviewers were unqualified to make this

determination. Because Quality does not argue that CPB 206’s

requirements are improper, there is no basis to hold that Aetna

wrongfully denied coverage for Quality’s services. 

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fitzroy Jackson, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 706]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), rendered October 24, 1989, as amended, convicting him. of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

It cannot be said that the defendant was denied fair notice of the charges against him, since he received notice prior to trial of the fact that the People were prosecuting him on an "acting in concert” theory *(cf., People v Rivera,*198 AD2d 529, 530, *affd*84 NY2d 766; *People v Gaskin,*184 AD2d 525). Moreover, the trial court’s charge on acting in concert did not prejudice the defendant, since "[tjhere is no distinction between liability as a principal and criminal culpability as an accessory and the status for which the defendant is convicted has no bearing upon the theory of the prosecution” *(see, People v Duncan,*46 NY2d 74, 79-80, *rearg denied*46 NY2d 940, *cert denied*442 US 910).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Delgado,*80 NY2d 780; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 82-1000.

#### Halsell *v.*Kimberly-Clark Corp.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|   | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      17, 2008 |                                      |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                      |
|                                 |                                      |
|                                 |                                      |
|                                 | Joseph      Isaac Gutnick            |
|                                 | Chairman      of the Board, President and |
|                                 | Chief      Executive Officer         |
|                                 | (Principal      Executive Officer)   |
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Sam Bhatt, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Emtec, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.             Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

                a)             designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;

                b)            evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                c)             disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                a)             all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

                b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS John S. McCain Sails Alongside HMAS Ballarat

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Markus Castaneda |

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
No. 91-6166.

#### Andino *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1  Libra Alliance Corporation  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned officer of Libra Alliance Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:   March 27, 2007  /s/ April L. Marino April L. Marino Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Director to Visit Thailand July 18-22, 2022

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Thailand

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25 Conducts Search and Rescue

By Joint Region Marianas Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News