alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Legend International Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the
undersigned, Joseph Isaac Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  March
25, 2009




graphicJoseph
      Isaac GutnickChairman
      of the Board, President andChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)




69
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JON GALANTE,

Petitioner

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

BOARD OF REVIEW,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 288 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AN NA VE R ON I C A MUR R I E T A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10465 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 1 7 2 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A nn a V er on i caM urri et a app ea l s f rom the 37 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h e rg u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rp o s s e s s io n w ith in te n t to d is tr ib u te m a r i j ua na , i n vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) , ( b) ( 1) ( C ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED NO V 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10465 2 M u rr ie tac o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e d u r a llye rr e db yf a ilin g to c ons i de rhe ri ndi vi dua l c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd ar gum e nt s f oral ow e rs e nt e nc e . T he r e c or d i ndi c a t e s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d M urr i e t a ’ s a r gum e nt s i n l i ghtof th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s a n dd idn o t o th e rw is e p r o c e d u r a llye rr . Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 1 - 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . M urri et a a l so cont ends thather s ent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e. In l i g h to f th e t o t a l i tyo f

th e c i r c u ms t a n c e s a n dth e f a c t o r s s e tf

o rth i n 1 8 U . S. C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , h e rs e n te n c e a t th e b o tto m o f th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e is r e a s o n ab le . See Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d a t993- 94. AF F I RME D.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 14 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Browns Ferry 1 Docket (050- 00259)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated H - Health Physics O - Control Room Ops 160 - No communication / information not communicated O - Operations H - Health Physics 

29

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR173 - Physical conditions LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Oversight / IR131 - Management expectations or directions LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 143 - Tracking / trending LTA X - Site-wide X - Site-wide 143 - Tracking / trending LTA X - Site-wide X - Site-wide 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering H - Health Physics 146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

730

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA G - Engineering G - Design 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering G - Design 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA H - Health Physics 

H - Health Physics
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 15 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Browns Ferry 1 Docket (050- 00259)

Work Planning & Practices / IR191 - Team interactions LTA H - Health Physics O - Control Room Ops 191 - Team interactions LTA O - Operations H - Health Physics 

1148

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / LER146 - Evaluation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

14

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 23
1 

### Green, David A.
From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:07 PM To: cchilds@jlfrench.com Subject: Trip Report
Hi Corey, this is a courtesy e

- mail letting you know that the trip report that we sent back for you to review will be classified as non - CBI and is considered to be an accurate account of your aluminum operations. Comments were due back to our office on Au gust 26, 2010. Thanks Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243

- 02 Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207 Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
No. 91-6177.

#### Martin et al. *v.*Medical Center of Delaware.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
J

- A08010

- 22

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

ADOPTION OF: Z.K.S.I., U.Z.M.I.,

AND E.K.I., JR.

APPEAL OF: B.S., MOTHER :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1114 WDA 2021

Appeal from the Decree Entered August 27, 2021

In the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County Orphans' Court at

No(s): No. 2020

- 720 IVT,

No. 2020

- 721 IVT, No. 2020

- 722 IVT

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and McCAFFERY, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY McCAFFERY, J.: FILED: May 3, 2022

While I agree that we are bound by Commonwealth v. Walker

, 185

A.3d 969 (Pa. 2018), and its progeny, I write to express my concern about

the ramifications of this line of case law which results in quashal, or waiver,

situations like the outcome of this case. C ounsel ’ s inaction effectively

amount ed to an abandonment of Appellant at a crucial stage in appell ate

proceedings, wherein counsel: (1) did not request a correction in order to

perfect the appeal; (2) did not respond to this Court’s rule to show cause

which pointed out the problem ; and (3) did not address the issue in the

appellate brief. Due to counsel ’ s inaction, Appellant has no legal recourse in

a consequential life

- altering decision

, in which her parental rights to her three

children are irrevocably terminated

.J

- A08010

- 22

- 2

-

President Judge Emeritus Bender Joins this Concurring Statement.

Judge La zarus Joins this Concurring Statement.
#### Carthew, Appellant, vs. City of Platteville, Respondent.

*April 13*

May *2, 1916.*

*Johns v. Platteville, ante,*p. 219, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Grant county: Geoeg-e ClemeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed..*

*Calvert Spensley,*for tbe appellant.

*R. A. Ooodell,*attorney, and *J. W. Murphy,*of counsel, for tbe respondent.

RoseNbeeey, J.

Tbe issues in tbis ease are tbe same as those in tbe case of *Johns v. Platteville, ante,*p. 219, 157 N. W. 761, and tbis case is controlled by tbe decision, in that case, and tbe mandate will therefore be tbe same.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with tbe opinion in *Johns v. Platteville,*tbe circuit court to assess damages upon tbis record or take further testimony upon that point, as it may determine.
No. 82-5417.

#### Angle, aka McClure *v.*Bowen et al.

Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00523-CV

In re Frank E. Parramore

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had

not timely ruled on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, since relator filed his petition,

the trial court has acted on the petition. Because relator has received a ruling on his habeas petition,

which was the same relief he sought via his mandamus proceeding, we deny the petition for writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Filed: August 30, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          50,295
<SECURITIES>                                    35,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,394
<PP&E>                                          46,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,155
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,043
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-4982

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODNEY J. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-02-46)

Submitted: October 24, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony F. Anderson, Melissa W. Friedman, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Andrew

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney J. Brown appeals the judgment of the district court

convicting him of possession with intent to distribute more than

fifty grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841

(2000). On appeal, Brown claims that the Government produced

insufficient evidence of its informant’s reliability to support its

search warrant. As noted by Brown in his brief, this court has

previously addressed the reliability of informants with respect to

controlled purchases of narcotics and found such use entirely

appropriate. See United States v. Clyburn, 24 F.3d 613, 618 (4th

Cir. 1994). Moreover, we find Brown’s attempts to distinguish the

facts of his case from Clyburn to be unpersuasive. Accordingly, we

affirm Brown’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
U.S. Department **Transport Airplane Directorate**

of Transportation **Aircraft Certification Service Federal A** 

**viation** 1601 Lind Avenue, S. W. **Ad ministration**  Renton, Washington 98057 - 3356 May 3 , 2012 Mr. Robert G. Filacchione Program Manager, CAS/TS Regulatory

Administration The Boeing Company PO Box 3707, MC 03
- 52 Seattle, WA 98124
- 2207
Dear Mr. Filacchione : We have received your April 18, 2012 petition , on behalf of The Boeing Company , requesting exemption from § § 25.855(b), 25.855(h)(2), 25.857(e)(2), and 25
. 857(e)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulation s . This exemption, if granted, would permit relief from the design and performance requirements regarding fire protection sy stems for the lower lo be cargo compartment on Boeing Model 747
- 400 large cargo freighters. Your petition has been added to public docket n o. FAA
- 20 1 2
- 0 45 5 and is being processed
. We will contact you if we need additional information. A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 day s before the proposed effective date of the exemption. Although you requested that we not delay

your petition by

publishing a summary

notice in the Federal Register , we did not find good cause to waive publication of the notice
. Therefore, we will publish a summary of the petition in the Federal Register so that the public may comment on it. We will advise you of our final decision on your petition as soon as possible
. If you have questions in the meanti me, you may call Steph en Happenn y , Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Sy stems, at (425) 227
- 2147 , e - mail s tephen. happenny @faa.gov. Sincerel y, /S/ Kenna Sinclair Standardization Branch Transport Airplane Directorate Federal Aviation Administration
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Joint Base Lewis-McChord Senior Leaders Meet with Consulate General of Japan in Seattle

By Sgt. Youtoy Martin 5th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27952]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 776 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-474, K2025-471.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27952 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Joseph Gutnick                                                 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Joseph I. Gutnick                                            |   |
|   | Title: Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer |   |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                      |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 786 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-489, K2025-486.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27962 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 783 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-485, K2025-482.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27959 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```