alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 111 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: North Anna 1 Docket (050- 00338)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Fitness for Duty / IR123 - Self-declaration LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 128 - Non-compliance O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

215

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

323

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR182 - Work package quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

538

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER187 - Action implementation LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,383                   6,417
<SECURITIES>                                     6,605                     178
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,179                   7,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,420                   1,051
<INVENTORY>                                      6,763                   7,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   360                     554
<PP&E>                                           1,830                   1,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,428                  23,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,709                   5,068
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        46,064                  45,044
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,345)                (26,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,428                  23,330
<SALES>                                         16,871                   6,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,871                   6,504
<CGS>                                            9,283                   4,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,752                   3,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40                      90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,912                 (1,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       390                    (46)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,522                 (1,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,522                 (1,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16                  (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14                  (0.16)


</TABLE>
No. 82-6057.

No. 82-6079.

#### In re West; and In re Tanner.

Petitions for writs of ha-beas corpus denied.
NO. 07-07-0047-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	SEPTEMBER 18, 2007

	______________________________

	C. WILLIENELL ZIMMER HAYNES, ET AL., APPELLANTS

	V.

	MOORE COUNTY GAS PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL., APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;

	NO. 01-72; HONORABLE RON ENNS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	C. Willienell Zimmer Haynes, et al., appellants, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  All costs incurred are adjudged against the party incurring the same.   No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Mackey K. Hancock

						         Justice
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas M.
Finn, certify that: 1.
I have
  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Speedus Corp.;2.
Based on my
  knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my
  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
  for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The
  registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
Designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
Evaluated
  the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
  this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in
  this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
  (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
The
  registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
  registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting.  Date:
May 15, 2006By:
/s/ Thomas
  M. FinnName:
Thomas M.
  FinnTitle:
Treasurer
  and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer 20
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# PACAF Hosts Pacific Unity Multi-Lateral Civil Engineer Key Leader Engagement in Guam

By Staff Sgt. Divine Cox36th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### In the Matter of Kevin M. Wenke, Respondent, v Janet L. Wenke, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 54]

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Memorandum: Absent any showing of exigent circumstances, Family Court erred in granting an ex parte order that transferred "placement” of the parties’ son to the paternal grandparents without affording respondent mother any notice or opportunity to be heard in opposition to the bare allegations made by petitioner father. Under the circumstances of this case, had a timely application been made to this Court prior to the completion of visitation directed in the ex parte order, this Court would have granted leave to appeal and vacated such order pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a). Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Multipurpose Room Dedication Draws Cobra Gold Conclusion, Seals International Ties

By Petty Officer 2nd Class Marc Castaneda American Forces Network Pacific

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Green Bay, Royal Thai Navy Kick Off Cobra Gold 2017

More News
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILLY DALTON FROST,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-253, CA-95-265-3-P)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Frost appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)), and his application for

a writ of Audita Querela under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1994). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Frost, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-95-265-

3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1501 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1501

 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2017

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Ms. Esty, Mr. Palazzo, and 
 Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 
       to small transit intensive cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Community Transit Improvement 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENTS.

    Section 5336(h)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(3) of amounts not apportioned under paragraphs (1) and 
        (2), 3.0 percent shall be apportioned to urbanized areas with 
        populations of less than 200,000 in accordance with subsection 
        (i);''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne**, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photon Dynamics, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/Jeffrey A. Hawthorne   **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne** **President and Chief Executive Officer**
Date: February 9, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7110
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MITCHELL LOCKLEAR, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-42, CA-97-146-5-H) Submitted: February 3, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mitchell Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. Chr istine Witcover Dean, Assistant United S tates Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Locklear , Nos. CR-92-42; CA-97-146-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 82-1091.

#### Thian *v.*Ray et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re William Andrew Allen, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-19-00507-CR, 01-19-00508-CR, 01-19-00535-CR, 01-19-

00536-CR, 01-19-00537-CR, 01-19-00538-CR, 01-19-00539-

CR, 01-19-00540-CR, 01-19-00541-CR, 01-19-00542-CR, 

01-19-00543-CR

Date Motion Filed: August 30, 2019

Party Filing Motion: Relator, William Andrew Allen

A majority of the panel has voted to deny rehearing.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sherry Radack___

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __November 21, 2019___
No. 91-6070.

#### Malik *v.*Phillips et al.

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          20,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         860,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 808,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        224,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     374,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   808,837
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,594
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,928
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,928
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49



</TABLE>