alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Excelligence Learning Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: April 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Ronald Elliott                
|                      |  | Ronald Elliott                    
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and       
|                      |  | Acting Principal Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1312 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1312

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 to require 
   an annual review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the 
  annual government-business forum on capital formation that is held 
                         pursuant to such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Capital Formation 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT-BUSINESS FORUM ON CAPITAL 
              FORMATION.

    Section 503 of the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 
(15 U.S.C. 80c-1) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The Commission shall--
            ``(1) review the findings and recommendations of the forum; 
        and
            ``(2) each time the forum submits a finding or 
        recommendation to the Commission, promptly issue a public 
        statement--
                    ``(A) assessing the finding or recommendation of 
                the forum; and
                    ``(B) disclosing the action, if any, the Commission 
                intends to take with respect to the finding or 
                recommendation.
    ``(f) Forum Findings.--Nothing in this section shall require the 
Commission to agree to or act upon any finding or recommendation of the 
forum.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

 

CONTACT REPORT

Date/Time Project Name Project Number

August 17, 2011 10:30am Ferroalloys RTR MME-411

EC/R Originator Contact Phone Number

Bradley Nelson Justyna Krupa – Calgon Carbon Corp. (412) 787-4762

General Subject

The purpose of the telephone call was to discuss mercury control options for an electric arc 

furnace equipped with a wet scrubber. Ms. Krupa stated that Calgon Carbon installs both 

activated carbon injection (ACI) and carbon bed systems. However, based on the stack gas 

parameters provided to the company, they believe that the carbon bed is not feasible or 

practical based on the high exhaust flow rate. Additional information with regards to the 

mercury control of the EAF was sent by the vendor and is included as an attachment to this 

contact report.
Attachment 1. Email Correspondence

From: Justyna Krupa [mailto:JKrupa@calgoncarbon-us.com] 

Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 12:37 PM

To: Brad Nelson

Subject: Initial Remarks

Brad,

At this time, a fixed bed carbon system for treating this high flowrate for Hg removal is not feasible or 

practical.

The linear velocity for a carbon fixed bed needs to be less than 100 fpm, so for the flow rate of 183,671 

acfm, that is a large surface area which means several large adsorbers. 

We may have other ideas to offer but that will take a few days to investigate. 

Please also be aware that the PAH will adsorb on carbon, but without knowing the 

composition/concentration, we cannot estimate carbon usage rate. The Formaldehyde will not physically 

adsorb on carbon. I hope this information is sufficient for your meeting today and I will follow-up in a few 

days after we have come up with a potential solution. Thank you for your patience.

Regards,

Justyna Krupa

Inside Technical Sales Representative-East Region

412-787-4762 (direct)

412-787-4523 (fax)

jkrupa@calgoncarbon-us.com

This email and attachment(s) contain proprietary and/or confidential information which is protected from 

disclosure. It is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, 

or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s),please contact the sender by reply 

email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to 

the original message.

This email is for your information only and is not intended to be legally binding. Neither Calgon Carbon 

Corporation nor its affiliates or subsidiaries will have any legally binding obligation until execution by both 

parties of formal contract documents, all of the terms of which, including the terms herein, must first have 

been reviewed and approved by Calgon Carbon Corporation’s Management and/or, if required by Calgon 

Carbon Corporation’s authority limitations, its Board of Directors.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1520

PORTFOLIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.,

Intervenor,

and

INTELLX, INC. and MEDTECH PRODUCTS, LTD.,

Intervenors.

Richard P. Beem , Beem Patent Law Firm, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant.

With him on the brief was John R. Linzer . Of counsel on the brief were Paul J. Kozacky

and Jerome R. Weitzel , Kozacky & Weitzel, of Chicago, Illinois.

Mark B. Rees , Attorney, Office of the General C ounsel, United States International

Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued fo r appellee. With him on the brief were

James M. Lyons , General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson , Assistant General Counsel for

Litigation.

James H. Shalek , Proskauer Rose LLP, of New York, New York, argued for

intervenors Church & Dwight Co., Inc. With him on the brief were Alan Federbush and

Baldassare Vinti . Of counsel on the brief were Steven P. Hollman

, Lewis E. Leibowitz

, Susan M. Cook , and Rebecca C. Mandel , Hogan & Hartson, LLP, of Washington, DC.

David Lieberworth , Garvey Schubert Barer, of Seattl e, Washington, for intervenors

Intellix, Inc., and Medtech Products, Ltd. With him on the brief was Lizabeth Levinson , of

Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States International Trade CommissionNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1520

PORTFOLIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.,

Intervenor,

and

INTELLX, INC. and MEDTECH PRODUCTS, LTD.,

Intervenors.



# Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission

in CASE NO(S). 337-TA-546

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it i s

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (SCHALL, Circuit Judge , CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge , and

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge )

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.



### ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED

_ June 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly_

_ ____________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Exhibit 31.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeffery A. Mason, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Jeffery A. Mason Chief Financial Officer
|----- |  | --------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# B-1s Conduct Bilateral Training with Koku-Jieitai in Vicinity of Japan

By 1st Lt. Joshua Sinclair28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Visits Forward Edge of Indo-Pacific

Senior Airman Michael Murphy

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Exhibit 13.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sadia S.A. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Fontana Filho, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

               (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter Fontana Filho
Name: Walter Fontana Filho
Title: Chief Executive Officer

June 25,  2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Sadia S.A. and will be retained by Sadia S.A. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### GEORGE ACHENBACH v. THOMAS P. JOHNSTON.

*Field*— Murninff *Woods*— Penalty.

A field grown up-in broom-sedge and- wire-grass, surrounded" by an old fence and used as a pasture, is not “woods within the meaning of the statute, Bat. Rev. ch. 13, § 1^ and the owner burning off the samé-is not liable to the penalty imposed by the act for an alleged injury to-an adjoining proprietor.

*{Hall*v. *Orawford,*5 Jones, 3; cited, distinguished and approved.)

Civil Action tried at August Special Term,. 1880, of Rowan Superior Court, before *McKoy, J.*

The action was brought to recover damages for an injury alleged to- have been caused by the defendant in- burning-off the broom sedge on his land when there was -a strong wind blowing towards the land of plaintiff, which by the alleged negligence of defendant caused the fire to be communicated to plaintiff’s fence, destroying a part of the same. The defendant denied the allegation of negligence, and among other things averred that he and five other persons used every effort to- prevent the fire from spreading so as to injure the plaintiff.

The evidence tended to show that the defendant’s land (burned off) consisted of a field grown up in broom sedge and wire grass, surrounded by an old fence and used as *265pasture land. There was no evidence that defendant notified plaintiff of bis intention to barn, off'the fields but there was evidence showing that after the fire reached plaintiff’s land, the defendant used great diligence in trying to prevent its spreading and injuring plaintiff s fences.

The plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to charge the jury that the policy of the law (Bat. Rev. ch. 13) forbids any one from setting fire to his woods unless two day’s written notice is first given to all persons owning adjoining land,, which the court gave, but added that there was no, evidence that the defendant had set fire to his woods, to which the plaintiff excepted. The jury found the issues in favor of defendant,, judgment,, appeal by plaintiff.

Mr. *J. M.*McOorkU, for plaintiff

No counsel for defendant.

Ruffes, J.

The question presented in this ease is» whether “a field grown up in broom sedge and wire grass,, surrounded by an old fence and used as a pasture,” can be construed to be “woods”' within, the meaning of the statute-. Bat. Rev. ch. 13, § 1. His Honor below held that it c©.uld not, and we concur in his opinion. *'*

The case of *Hall*v. *Crawford,*5 Jones, 3, in which it was held tha-t “an old field which had been turned out *without any fence around it cmd whieh had grown up- in broom sedge and pine bushes, some of which were %oaist-liigh and others- head-high,”'*did come within its meaning, stretched, the doctrine of being liberal in construing statutes in order to- reach the mischief intended to be remedied, as far as it is safe to follow. We therefore hold that in the ruling of the superior court there was no error.

No error. Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America’s Suppliers, Inc.,
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Michael Moore, principal financial officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/Michael MooreMichael
      MoorePrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      9, 2010
#### WILLIAM WOOTEN at. al. vs. ELIJAH POPE et al.

In a petition for the partition of land, or for the sale of it, for that purpose, under the act of 1812, (1 Rev. St. eh. 85, sec. 7) if the statements as to the persons entitled to the land and their respective shares therein, be not sufficiently precise and distinct, the Court will direct a reference to the Clerk and Master, for the necessary inquiries as to the interests of the parties.

This was a petition by some of the tenants in common of a certain tract of land, against their co-tenants for a sale of the land for partition, under the act of 1812; (1 Rev. St. c. *85,*sec. 7,) but the persons entitled to the land, and their respective shares therein, Avere not distinctly and precisely shown either in the statements of the petition, or by the evidence produced to establish them. Nor did it plainly appear from the record, who had been served with process, or had appeared as defendants to the^ petition; but, nevertheless, the cause Avas set for hearing, and transferred to the Supreme Court to be heard.

*307
      *B. F. Moore*for the petitioners.

*Badger*and the *Attorney General*for the defendants.

Gaston, Judge.

The statements in the petition as to the persons entitled to the premises, and of their respective shares therein, are wanting in distinctness and precision, and the evidence to establish these statements is as vague. We think it proper, therefore, to adopt a practice which prevails in an-alagous cases in England, which is there found convenient; and which, in our country, where the subdivision of estates, under the law of descents, so greatly increases the difficulty of ascertaining the remote collateral heirs of a deceased person, is almost indispensable. The plaintiffs there, in a bill for partition, state upon the record, their titles and those of the defendants; and whenever there is a difficulty respecting them, the Court directs a reference to ascertain what are the respective interests of the parties; and if it appear that they, or some of them, are entitled to the whole, then a partition is decreed according to the rights of those entitled, dismissing the bill as against those having no right. *Agar*vs. *Fairfax*—and *the same*vs. *Holdsworth,*17 Ves. 552. In this case, indeed, the application is for a sale under our act of 1812 *(1*Rev. Stat. ch. 85, sec. 7,) but that sale is but a substitute for partition; and, before it is decreed, there ought to be an ascertainment of the interests of the parties. The Clerk of this Court is therefore directed to make these inquiries. At the same time, he is directed to inquire and report whether a sale of the premises be necessary; and, as the transcript from the Court below does not plainly shew who have been served with process, or appeared as defendants to this petition, and as to whom it has been taken pro *confesso,*he will report thereon also.

Per Curiam. Order accordingly.