alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Milwaukee County, Respondent, vs. Illinois Surety Company, imp., Appellant.

*October 24*

November *14, 1916.*

*Principal and surety: Bonds: “Obligations:” “Indebtedness.”*

Promissory notes given by the buyer pursuant to a contract for the purchase of goods were “obligations” arising out of the contract, and the amount due on them was “indebtedness arising out of” the contract, within the meaning of a bond given to secure payment of such obligations and indebtedness.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: W. J. TueNee, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *-Flanders, Bottum, Fawsett & Bottum,*attorneys, and *Albert J. Hopkins,*of counsel, and oral argument by *B. II. Bottum*and *F. L. McNamara.*

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *Winfred 0. Zabel,*district attorney, *William L. Tibbs,*special assistant district attorney, and *Daniel W. Sullivan,*assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Tibbs.*

WiNsnow, C. J.

The case may be simply stated. The Carson Manufacturing Company contracted in writing with the respondent county to purchase a large quantity of chairs to be manufactured at the Milwaukee house of correction during a certain period, paying therefor by promissory notes to be given at the end of each month, and the appellant at the same time gave a bond conditioned to pay all obligations and indebtedness to the county “arising or to arise out of said agreement-.” In the present action it appears that notes were given and not paid, and this judgment was rendered against the surety for the amount due on such notes. We cannot doubt that the notes were “obligations” arising out of the contract and that the amount due on them is “indebtedness aris*260ing out of” tbe contract. Statement of the proposition seems to us to constitute its proof. We know of no way to make tbe argument stronger.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1159 

AN ACT 

To provide for continuing cooperation between the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Israel 

Space Agency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1159 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States and 

3 Israel Space Cooperation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 The Congress finds that— 

6 (1) authorized in 1958, the National Aero7 nautics and Space Administration (NASA) supports 

8 and coordinates United States Government research 

9 in aeronautics, human exploration and operations, 

10 science, and space technology; 

11 (2) established in 1983, the Israel Space Agen12 cy (ISA) supports the growth of Israel’s space indus13 try by supporting academic research, technological 

14 innovation, and educational activities; 

15 (3) the mutual interest of the United States 

16 and Israel in space exploration affords both nations 

17 an opportunity to leverage their unique abilities to 

18 advance scientific discovery; 

19 (4) in 1996, NASA and the ISA entered into 

20 their first agreement outlining areas of mutual co21 operation, which remained in force until 2005; 

22 (5) since 1996, NASA and the ISA have suc23 cessfully cooperated on many space programs sup24 porting the Global Positioning System and research 

25 related to the sun, earth science, and the environ26 ment; 
3 

•HR 1159 EH

1 (6) the bond between NASA and the ISA was 

2 permanently forged on February 1, 2003, with the 

3 loss of the crew of STS–107 including Israeli Astro4 naut Ilan Ramon; 

5 (7) the United States-Israel Strategic Partner6 ship Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–296) designated 

7 Israel as a Major Strategic Partner of the United 

8 States; and 

9 (8) on October 13, 2015, the United States and 

10 Israel signed the Framework Agreement between the 

11 National Aeronautics and Space Administration of 

12 the United States of America and the Israel Space 

13 Agency for Cooperation in Aeronautics and the Ex14 ploration and Use of Airspace and Outer Space for 

15 Peaceful Purposes. 

16 SEC. 3. CONTINUING COOPERATION. 

17 The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and 

18 Space Administration shall continue to work with the 

19 Israel Space Agency to identify and cooperatively pursue 

20 peaceful space exploration and science initiatives in areas 

21 of mutual interest, taking all appropriate measures to pro-
4 

•HR 1159 EH

1 tect sensitive information, intellectual property, trade se2 crets, and economic interests of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1159 

AN ACT 

To provide for continuing cooperation between the 

poses. and the Israel Space Agency, and for other purNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 168 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Saint Lucie 1 Docket (050- 00335)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated L - Licensing / regulatory affairs A - Administrative 

160 - No communication / information not communicated O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

210

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Fitness for Duty / IR128 - Non-compliance O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content F - Fuel Handling R - Refueling 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

315

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA C - Chemistry Z - Other / Unknown 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 185 - Procedural adherence LTA H - Health Physics M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA H - Health Physics M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering T - Testing 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 169 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Saint Lucie 1 Docket (050- 00335)

Work Planning & Practices / IR186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Y - Shipping / transportation Y - Shipping / transportatio 

1260

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 20
No. PD-0823-14 TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

v. JOHN BERRY JACKSON, Appellee

Appeal from Mitchell County * * * * * * JOHN BERRY JACKSON’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING HIS BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW * * * * * * Jeffrey A. Propst Attorney for Appellee, John Berry Jackson Texas Bar No. 24064062

P.O. Box 3717 Abilene, Texas 79604

Tel. (325) 455-1599 Fax (325) 455-1507 Email: jeff@keithandpropst.com PD-0823-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/29/2014 12:48:10 PM Accepted 12/29/2014 3:57:00 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKNo. PD-0823-14 TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

v. JOHN BERRY JACKSON, Appellee * * * * * * JOHN BERRY JACKSON’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING HIS BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW * * * * * * TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: Pursuant to the Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellee John Berry Jackson moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing his brief 15 days - until January 13, 2015. Mr. Jackson’s brief is currently due for filing on December 29, 2014. No previous motions to extend the deadline for filing the brief have beenfiled. In the last 30 days the undersigned counsel’s caseload has included a threeday jury trial, the filing of an appellate brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and multiple other hearings and appointments. Due to the undersigned counsel’s caseload and administrative duties, as well as the disruptive effect on business of the holiday season, counsel needs additional time to prepare the Appellee’s brief.WHEREFORE, the Appellee prays that his motion to extend the time for filing his brief until January 13, 2015, be granted. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey A. PROPST JEFFREY A. PROPST Texas Bar No. 24064062 P.O. Box 3717 Abilene, Texas 79604 Tel. (325) 455-1599 Fax (325) 455-1507 Email: jeff@keithandpropst.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeffrey A. Propst, hereby certify that on December 29, 2014, a copy of the Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time for Filing his Brief on Discretionary Review was served via certified electronic service provider to: Lisa McMinn State Prosecuting Attorney P.O. Box 13046 Austin, Texas 78711 information@spa.texas.gov Barrett Thomas Assistant District Attorney 100 E. 3rd St., Suite 202 Sweetwater, Texas 79556 barrett@32ndda-tx.us /s/ Jeffrey A. Propst JEFFREY A. PROPST Attorney for John Berry Jackson
Information Collection Request NRG Vienna8Acid Gas HAP GroupMethod Test Length Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Reported UnitsHCl/HF 26A 180 8:55-11:55 13:08-16:18 16:39-19:39 lb/mmBtuHCN CTM-033 180 8:55-11:55 13:08-16:18 16:39-19:39 lb/mmBtuNOx 7E 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2SO2 6C 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2Process Data Time 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35Process Data Date 2-24-10 2-24-10 2-24-10F-factorMercury and Metallic HAP GroupMercury 30B 120 8:43-10:43 16:25-18:25 21:30-23:30 lb/mmBtuMetals + Filterable PM 29 240 8:03-14:06 16:18-20:35 21:20-01:30 lb/mmBtuPM (Runs 2 and 3) 5 60 - 15:52-17:42 21:25-23:04 lb/mmBtuPM2.5 + Total PM (Run 1) OTM-027 214 7:00-12:30 - - lb/mmBtuCondensable PM OTM-028 214/60 7:00-12:30 15:52-17:42 21:25-23:04 lb/mmBtuProcess Data Time 7:00-14:06 15:52-20:35 21:20-01:30Process Data Date 2-23-10 2-23-10 2-23/24-10F-factorNon-Dioxin Organic HAP GroupVOST 0031 120 9:44-11:35 13:05-15:20 16:49-18:42 lb/mmBtu, ug/dscm@7%O2Methane 18 120 9:44-11:44 13:05-15:05 16:39-18:39 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2POM 0011 120 9:44-12:12 13:05-15:38 16:39-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ug/dscm@7%O2Formaldehyde 0011 120 9:44-12:12 13:05-15:38 16:39-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2THC 25A 120 9:50-11:50 13:06-15:06 16:39-18:39 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2CO 10 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2SO2 6C 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ppmvd @7%O2Process Data Time 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35Process Data Date 2-24-10 2-24-10 2-24-10F-factorDioxin/Furan Organic HAP GroupDioxin/Furan/PCB 23 480 6:46-15:03 15:43-23:54 7:55-18:26 lb/mmBtu, ng/dscm@7%O2Process Data Time 6:46-15:03 15:43-23:54 7:55-18:26Process Data Date 2-23-10 2-23-10 2-24-10F-factor
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1371 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care 

providers certain medical records of veterans who receive health care 

from such providers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2017 

Mr. O’ROURKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers certain 

medical records of veterans who receive health care from 

such providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Connect Act of 

5 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1371 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO DISCLOSE CERTAIN MEDICAL 

2 RECORDS OF VETERANS WHO RECEIVE NON3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 HEALTH CARE. 

5 Section 7332(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(H)(i) To a non-Department entity (including 

9 private entities and other departments or agencies of 

10 the Federal Government) that provides hospital care 

11 or medical treatment to veterans. 

12 ‘‘(ii) An entity to which a record is disclosed 

13 under this subparagraph may not redisclose or use 

14 such record for a purpose other than that for which 

15 the disclosure was made.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Partners Take to the Air

By Petty Officer 3rd Class Kylie Jagiello Commander, U.S. 3rd Fleet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Argued and submitted April 16,

reversed and remanded in part for reconsideration; otherwise affirmed June 23,

reconsideration denied September 30,

petition for review allowed November 16,1993 (318 Or 60)

See later issue Oregon Reports

#### LAKE OSWEGO HUNT, INC., *Respondent, v.*The filings of the NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, *Respondent below, and*SAIF CORPORATION, *Petitioner.*

(90-11-001; CA A75468)

854 P2d 947

*414Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Peter A. Ozanne, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William H. Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

LEESON, J.

*415LEESON, J.

SAIF seeks judicial review of an order of the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) finding that four horse trainers who provided services to Lake Oswego Hunt, Inc., during the audit period April 1, 1989, through March 31, 1990, were not “workers” under *former*ORS 656.005 (27)(renumbered ORS 656.005(28) in 1990).

DIF applied the four-factor right to control test of *Castle Homes, Inc. v. Whaite,*95 Or App 269, 769 P2d 215 (1989), for the entire audit period, and concluded that, because Lake Oswego Hunt neither controlled nor retained a right to control the manner and method used to train the students or horses, the trainers were not workers and were not subject to workers’ compensation premium assessment. That conclusion follows from DIF’s findings, which are supported by substantial evidence.

SAIF contends that DIF erred by not also applying the relative nature of the work test. We disagree. The right to control test enabled DIF to resolve the issues in this case. Therefore, it was unnecessary to apply the relative nature of the work test. *See Premsingh & Assoc. v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins.,*111 Or App 624, 627, 826 P2d 120, *rev den*313 Or 300 (1992).

SAIF also contends that DIF erred by failing to apply *former*ORS 701.025 (renumbered ORS 670.600 in 1991), which sets the standards for independent contractors, for the period from October 3, 1989, to March 31, 1990. We agree. *S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins.,*121 Or App 402, 854 P2d 944 (1993). We remand for application of the standards under *former*ORS 701.025 for the relevant portion of the audit period.

Portion of order relating to audit period from October 3, 1989, to March 31, 1990, reversed and remanded for reconsideration; otherwise affirmed.
No. 86-5344.

#### Miller *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 960.] Motion of American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted.
**Exhibit 99.1**

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002, as amended by Amendment No. 1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| Dated: November 22, 2002  | /s/  MARK J. LEVIN            |   |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |                                         |   |
|                           | Mark J. Levin                           |   |
|                           | Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                           | (Principal executive officer)           |   |
|                           |                                    |   |
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radiant Oil & Gas (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Jurasin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 22, 2011  RADIANT OIL & GAS(REGISTRANT)/s/ JOHN M. JURASINJohn M. Jurasin
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	U.S., Australian service members begin exercise PACIFIC EDGE
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">U.S., Australian service members begin exercise PACIFIC EDGE</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Nov. 30, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii, </span>
    <p>Members of the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marines, U.S. Navy, and Hawaii Air National Guard began a multi-faceted, training exercise alongside servicemembers from the Australian Defence Force at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, Nov. 28 – Dec. 9.<br />
The exercise, PACIFIC EDGE, will provide effective and realistic training, tailored to equip warfighters with skills to confront advanced challenges throughout the Indo-Pacific Region.<br />
This is the second iteration of PACIFIC EDGE and will include a variety of fourth and fifth generation aircraft integrating with the Royal Australian Navy’s guided missile destroyer, the HMAS Brisbane, increasing interoperability and integration across multiple domains.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by HASCO Medical, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Hal Compton, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.  /s/ Hal Compton, Jr. Name: Hal Compton, Jr. Title: Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer  Dated:  March 30, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Edwin William BONNELL, petitioner, v. AMTEX, INC.

No. 96-1257.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 14, 1997.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.