alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gustave Hagni, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

The verdict was not without evidence to sustain it, so as to authorize this court to hold that there was an abuse of discretion by the judge who tried the case, in refusing the motion for a new trial.

New trial. Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1873.

Hagni was placed on trial for the offense of taking and carrying away, with intent to steal the same, “ one pale, yellow, muly-headod cow, of the value of $30 00, of the personal goods and chattels of Edward Beehtoldt.” The defendant pleaded not guilty. The jury found to the contrary. Amotion was made for a new trial because the verdict ivas contrary to the evidence. The motion was overruled and the defend*585ant excepted. To report the evidence would illustrate no principle of law, and it is therefore omitted.

A. B. Culberson; W. F. Wright; Howard Van Epps, for plaintiff in error.

John T. Glenn, solicitor general, for the state.

Trippe, Judge.

This is one of those cases where this court will not interfere with the discretion of the judge who tried it, in refusing a new trial. The ground taken in the motion, is that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The court overruled the motion, and we cannot say there was an abuse of discretion, though there were pretty strong circumstances in the case which, if the jury had seen proper to construe as counsel do, would have tended with some force to have relieved the defendant from the charge. Of these the jury were to determine, and we let their decision stand.

Judgment affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: In the Interest of S.A.W

Appellate case number: 01-22-00320-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-46728

Trial court: 507th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s brief was due on June 21, 2022. On June 28, 2022, the Clerk of this Court 

notified appellant’s counsel that the time to file appellant’s brief had expired and requested a 

response. On July 5, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a motion requesting an extension of 30 days 

to file appellant’s brief. Our Court granted appellant’s motion and extended the time to file 

appellant’s brief to July 21, 2022. To date, however, appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief.

Because this is a termination appeal, this Court is required to dispose of this appeal within 

180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. ST. JUD.

ADMIN. R. 6.2(a). Here, the 180-day compliance deadline is set for September 30, 2022.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte abates this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing 

and appellant’s appointed counsel, Julie A. Ketterman, is required to show cause why she should 

not be relieved of her duties after a finding of good cause is rendered by the court on the record 

and, if so, to enter orders withdrawing counsel and appointing new counsel. See TEX. FAM. CODE

§ 107.016(2); In re M.V.G., 285 S.W.3d 573, 575–76 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, order). Any 

hearing shall be conducted within 10 days of the date of this Order. The trial court clerk shall file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s orders within 15 days of the date of this 

Order. If a hearing is held, the court reporter shall file a supplemental reporter’s record within 15 

days of the date of this Order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. 

The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s and 

reporter’s records, if any, that comply with this Order are filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sarah B. Landau___________

Acting individually

Date: ____August 5, 2022____
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Ambassador Cella Leads Pacific Panel for Indo-Pacific Business Forum

U.S. Embassy in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Tonga, and Tuvalu

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          38,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,296,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,279,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,157,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,023,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,276,267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             95,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
25% Fuel Category FacilityID CombustorID_common Gas 1 (NG Only) ILUSSGraniteCity No. 8 Galvanizing Line Furnace Gas 1 (NG Only) INAlcoaWarrick Pre-Heat Furnace #36
Gas 1 (NG Only) INArcelorMittalBurnsHarbor Hot Dip Coating Line Annealing Furnace Gas 1 (NG Only) INNucorSteel Cold Mill Annealing Gas 1 (NG Only) INOutokumpuStainlessPlate Heppenstall Annealing Furnace Gas 1 (NG Only) NCCampLejeuneMCB C-AS-4151-16 Gas 1 (NG Only) SCEastmanColombia HTM Heater #3 (Equip ID 1101) Gas 1 (NG Only) SCMichelinSandySprings B:02:01 Gas 1 (NG Only) TXMeadWestvacoEvadale 21-2105 Gas 1 (NG Only) UTWestinghouse 202 AVERAGE Gas 1 (NG Only) Gas 1 (Other) KSCoffeyvilleRefinery EU-39-FH0027 AVERAGE Gas 1 (Other - FF control) Gas 1 (Other) CAConocoPhilipsLosAng D146 B-202 U90 Gas 1 (Other) CAConocoPhilipsLosAng D687 - Boiler 8 Gas 1 (Other) CAExxonMobil-Torrance 24F-1 Gas 1 (Other) CAExxonMobil-Torrance 75F-1 Gas 1 (Other) ILAkzoNobelMorris B-1 Nebraska Boiler Gas 1 (Other) MNStPaulParkRef EU 026 Gas 1 (Other) WYSinclairWyoming Pt 41 #9 HPB Gas 1 (Other) WYSinclairWyoming Pt 74 #2 H2 Plant Heater AVERAGE Gas 1 (Other)

Gas 2 GAGPSRMRiincon EU BO02

Gas 2 WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 AVERAGE Gas 2 - FF/DSI control Gas 2 INRollsRoyceIndianapolis 70-65 Gas 2 INTateLyleSagamore 21B501 Gas 2 INUSSteelGaryWorks O4B10459 Gas 2 LAShellChemicaGeismar Furnace F-S801 Gas 2 MDSeverstalSparrows 1BLR (No. 1 Boiler) Gas 2 SCBMWManufacturingCo HB03

Gas 2 WVMountainStateCarbonFollansb ee S1 AVERAGE Gas 2 - UncontrolledTotal Baseline Control Mercury Emissions Mercury Emissions

Units Number of Test Runs in

Average No HAP APCD Control 3.31595E-08 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 2.6818E-06 lb/MMBtu 3

No HAP APCD Control 1.50533E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.29078E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.16682E-06 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 9.35133E-08 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 3.35223E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 3.54526E-07lb/MMBtu 3 Cyclone or Multiclone 3.73333E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 7.49853E-07lb/MMBtu 3 6.07E-07 10 Fabric Filter 3.63E-07lb/MMBtu 3 3.63E-07 1 No HAP APCD Control 1.21E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.74E-08 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.59E-06 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 8.17E-05 lb/MMBtu 1 No HAP APCD Control 1.27E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.87E-06 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 7.02E-10 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 5.40E-10 lb/MMBtu 3 1.07E-05 8
Fabric FilterDry Sorbent Injection 0.000000567lb/MMBtu 2 Fabric FilterDry Sorbent Injection 4.29771E-07lb/MMBtu 12 4.98E-07 2 No HAP APCD Control 2.50938E-07lb/MMBtu 2 No HAP APCD Control 1.58036E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 7.79216E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.06946E-07lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 1.29742E-06 lb/MMBtu 3 No HAP APCD Control 8.25161E-08 lb/MMBtu 3

No HAP APCD Control 6.20333E-06 lb/MMBtu 3 1.27E-06 7
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 51011 consolidated with No. 21

- 51023 Summary Calendar

United States of America, Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus
Sebastian Batz

- Mejia, Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 488

- 1 USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 525

- 1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED Feb ruary 16, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-51011 Document: 00516205346 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/16/2022No. 21

- 51011 c/w No. 21

- 51023

2 Sebastian Batz

- Mej i a appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)( 1 ) , along with the revocation of the term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense

. He has not briefed the validit y of the revocation of his supervised release or his revocation sentence and has, therefore, abandoned any challenge to them. See United States v. Reagan , 596 F.3d 251, 254

- 55 (5th Cir. 2010). For the first time on appeal, Batz

- Me ji a contends that the enh ancement of his illegal reentry sentence pursuant to § 1326(b) was unconstitutional because the fact of his prior conviction was not charged in his indictment or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed an unopposed motion for summary disp osition and a letter brief explaining that he has raised this issue only to preserve it for further review and conceding correctly that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F .3d 546, 553

- 54 (5th Cir. 2019)

. Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Batz

- Mej i a ’s motion is GRANTED , and the district court’s judgmen t s are AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-51011 Document: 00516205346 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/16/2022
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1028. MIONA MCBRIDE v. CHARLES WILLIAMS.

The Appellant’s Motion titled Withdrawal of Appeal, filed in the above-styled

case, is hereby GRANTED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 06, 2018

02/06/2018
#### State, Plaintiff in error, vs. Wilkinson and others, Defendants in error.

*April 3*

April *28, 1936.*

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, J. E. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, *William A. Zabel,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *Herman A. Mosher,*deputy district attorney, and *Francis A. Darnieder,*special assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Darnieder*and *Mr. Mosher.*

' For the defendants in error there was a brief by *Sullivan & Sullivan,*attorneys for John J. Wilkinson; *Albert M. Kelly,*attorney for Frank A. Marz, Edwin F. Flintrop, and Leo Napientelc; *George A. Hanley,*attorney for Andrew Wesolowski; *Cyrus D. Shabaz,*attorney for Charles H. Hathaway; *Paul E. Bornemann,*attorney for James God-sell; and *Lyman G. Wheeler,*attorney for Samuel J. Brew, and oral argument by *Mr. Eugene J. Sullivan, Mr. Kelly,*
      *441
      *Mr. Hanley, Mr. Sh,abate, Mr. Wheeler,*all of Milwaukee, and *Mr. Willis E. Donley*of Menomonie.

Pee Curiam.

This case was argued and submitted with, the case of *State v. Kitzerow, ante,*p. 436, 267 N. W. 71. and is ruled by the decision in that case.

The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<MULTIPLIER> 1000

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              2,410
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      29,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                        1,199
<INVENTORY>                                         3,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   19,028
<PP&E>                                             13,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                      3,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     48,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              15,190
<BONDS>                                            20,483
<COMMON>                                              124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         23,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       48,284
<SALES>                                             6,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    9,474
<CGS>                                               1,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      11,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.13)
<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported at -0- herein.

* Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
doubtful account in the Statement of Financial Position.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS: TEST PROCEDURE FOR CLOTHES WASHERS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, October 28, 2010

9 a.m. – 4 p.m. ET, Room 1E-245

Purpose

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present the notice of proposed

rulemaking on test procedures for clothes washers in standby mode, off mode, and active 

mode. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested parties with DOE’s statutory 

requirements and proposed test procedures.

Agenda

9:00-9:05 am Welcome

9:05-9:15 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9:15-9:40 am Stakeholder Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

9:40-9:45 am Introduction and Regulatory History

Stephen Witkowski

Overview of past and current clothes washer rulemakings, 

including statutory authority, schedules, and associated 

documents.

9:45-10:30 am Overview and Standby Mode, Off Mode, and 

Additional Active Mode Test Procedures

Judith Reich

Covered products, compliance date, incorporation by 

reference of IEC Standard 62301, and determination of 

modes to be incorporated.

10:30-10:45 am Break

10:45-11:30 am Standby Mode, Off Mode, and Additional Active Mode 

Test Procedures -- Continued

Judith Reich

Adding specifications for the test methods and 

measurements for these modes, calculation of energy use 

associated with each operating mode, and measures of 

energy consumption.
11:30 am-12:00 pm Clothes Washer Active Mode Test Procedure

Timothy Sutherland

Technologies not covered by the current clothes washer test 

procedure and changes to reflect current usage patterns and 

capabilities (annual cycles and test load size).

12:00-1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:00-2:00 pm Clothes Washer Active Mode Test Procedure --

Continued

Timothy Sutherland

Changes to reflect current usage patterns and capabilities 

(use factors), test cloth, capacity measurement, water 

consumption factor, and energy test cycle.

2:00-2:15 pm Break

2:15-2:45 pm Clothes Washer Active Mode Test Procedure --

Continued

Timothy Sutherland

Other revisions and clarifications (detergent specifications, 

clothes washer for test cloth preconditioning, water supply 

pressure, and miscellaneous revisions and clarifications) 

and test procedure performance specifications.

2:45-3:15 pm Compliance with Other EPCA Requirements, Impact of 

the Proposed Amendments on EnergyGuide and 

ENERGY STAR, and Elimination of the Obsolete 

Clothes Washer Test Procedure

Judith Reich

3:15-3:30 pm Discussion of Other Issues

Doug Brookman

Open forum to discuss any remaining questions or issues 

identified by the participants.

3:30-3:45 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Stephen Witkowski

3:45 pm Adjourn
| Date:      March 31, 2010 |   | /s/ J. Sherman HendersonIII                |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                      |   |                                       |   |   |
|                      |   | J.      Sherman Henderson                  |   |   |
|                      |   |                                       |   |   |
|                      |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

|                      |   | /s/      Elaine G. Bush      |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Date:      March 31, 2010 |   |                         |   |   |
|                      |   | Elaine      G. Bush          |   |   |
|                      |   |                         |   |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marines with Tactical Readiness and Training Platoon Take on the Jungle

By Lance Cpl. Armando Elizalde3rd Marine Logistics Group 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News