alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60087

Summary Calendar

 

MADATALI KASSAMALI CHATOOR,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A91-907-305

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Madatali Kassamali Chatoor, a native and citizen of India,

entered the United States in 1985 without inspection and became

a lawful permanent resident in 1990. In 1996, Chatoor pleaded

guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320, trafficking in

counterfeit goods or services and aiding and abetting, and was

sentenced to eighteen months’ imprisonment and three years’

supervised release. 
No. 02-60087

-2-

In 2000, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) ordered

Chatoor removed and deported to India. Chatoor departed the

United States as ordered. 

In September 2001, Chatoor moved the BIA to reopen his

removal proceedings. Id. at 14. He alleged that under INS

v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), he was entitled to relief, and

he argued that his departure from the United States did not moot

or bar his action. The BIA denied Chatoor’s motion to reopen,

citing 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(d) and explaining that because Chatoor had

been deported, it lacked jurisdiction to consider his motion. 

Chatoor filed a timely petition for review. 

Chatoor contends that the BIA erred in relying on § 3.2(d). 

He argues that under St. Cyr, he is eligible for relief from

removal. He contends that the BIA may exercise its discretion to

reopen his case as an exceptional situation based on a change in

the law.

Chatoor’s position is foreclosed by our opinion in NavarroMiranda v. Ashcroft, ___ F.3d ___, 2003 WL 565800 (5th Cir.

Feb. 28, 2003) (No. 01-60945). Accordingly, Chatoor’s petition

for review is DENIED.

PETITION DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Navy Releases Official Logo for 75th Anniversary of WWII 

By Naval History and Heritage CommandCommunication and Outreach Division

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
No. 91-6186.

#### Nunn *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00093

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 096

- 31810 2

- 20

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### N^3 O WNER



### , L.P. D 

### / B 

### / A 

### N^3 L.P., WRIA 2017

- 3, L.P., WRIA

2017

- 2, L.P., WRIA 2017

- 7, L.P., AIRW 2 016

- 6, L.P., WRIA 2016

- 7, L.P.,

WRIA 2017

- 5, L.P., WRIA 2017

- 6, L.P. AND 

### WRIA 2017

- 4, L.P. , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Ac cordingly, relator s’ petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : April 9, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRAVCO MINING INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rodney Lozinski, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.
 

RODNEY LOZINSKIRodney Lozinski
Principal Executive and Financial Officer
March 23, 2006
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130515 & (56) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130515 

 COA: 256120 

Wexford CC: 03-006996-FC 

EDMUND THURMAN HERNDON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 Certification
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of AMERICHIP INTERNATIONAL, INC..(the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Thomas Schwanitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2001, that:
 
 The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        February 28, 2006
 
 /s/
        Thomas Schwanitz
 Thomas
        Schwanitz
 Chief
        Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Fadlin, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 719]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered March 23, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The undercover police officer testified that, before he purchased cocaine from the defendant, a few people approached the defendant, handed him something, and the defendant handed them something back. This testimony was inextricably interwoven with testimony about the entire transaction. It was also necessary to complete the narrative and to explain why the defendant was targeted by the undercover police officer *(see, People v Coleman,*205 AD2d 795, 796; *People v Rodriguez,*207 AD2d 917; *People v Campbell,*204 AD2d 474, 475; *People v Green,*170 AD2d 530, 531).

The People should have obtained a ruling from the trial court regarding the admissibility of the aforementioned uncharged drug transactions before evidence of them was introduced *(People v Williams,*197 AD2d 722, 723). However, the error was harmless because the evidence was admissible, the trial court offered to provide limiting instructions, and the proof of the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming *(see, People v Williams, supra).*O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 64

 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the United States Capitol 
Police and their role in securing the United States Capitol complex and 
  protecting Members of Congress, their staff, and the general public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2017

  Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Reichert, Mr. 
Carson of Indiana, and Mr. Pascrell) submitted the following concurrent 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the United States Capitol 
Police and their role in securing the United States Capitol complex and 
  protecting Members of Congress, their staff, and the general public.

Whereas the United States Capitol Police (USCP) has provided protection for 
        Congress since 1828;
Whereas the USCP is governed by the Capitol Police Board and comprised of USCP 
        Chief of Police Matthew Verderosa and more than 2,200 officers and 
        civilian personnel;
Whereas the USCP has exclusive jurisdiction within all buildings and grounds of 
        the United States Capitol complex, including the Library of Congress, 
        and shares concurrent jurisdiction in an established area around the 
        Capitol complex;
Whereas USCP officers work tirelessly to protect life and property in and around 
        the Capitol complex;
Whereas the dynamic nature of threats and dangers posed to Congress and our 
        society in the 21st century present new obstacles for USCP to overcome;
Whereas the USCP has demonstrated its commitment to the institution of Congress 
        by quickly and effectively responding to such obstacles and threats 
        while minimizing loss to life and property; and
Whereas recent attacks targeting law enforcement across the United States 
        further exemplify the risks faced by USCP officers each and every day: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States Capitol Police is an invaluable asset 
        to Congress and the community;
            (2) the United States Capitol Police deserve utmost 
        appreciation and respect; and
            (3) the Congressional community is expressly grateful for 
        the innumerable contributions and sacrifices made by the United 
        States Capitol Police to secure the United States Capitol 
        complex and protect Members of Congress, their staff, and the 
        general public.
                                 <all>
```
No. 90-5865.

#### Manns *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Contact : Directory : J0 : Protocol (J01P)

# Protocol (J01P)

#### Mission

Provide professional protocol support to U.S. Indo-Pacific Command leadership, visitors to the command, action officers, and ceremony participants to enhance INDOPACOM mission effectiveness. 

#### USINDOPACOM AOR Flags

Barge Request Forms  
                        -  COMPACFLT Commander's (4 Star) Barge Tour Request Form 
                        -  COMPACFLT Deputy Commander's (2 Star) Barge Tour Request Form   
                        -  COMPACFLT Remembrance Barge Tour Regulations and Request Form  (For a **Barge Tour reservation**, please call **(808) 474-2194) **     

 

(Last updated - July 2022)

 

Directory Links

                            -  J0 Special Staff   
                            -  J1 Manpower and Personnel   
                            -  J2 Intelligence   
                            -  J3 Operations   
                            -  J4 Logistics   
                            -  J5 Strategic Planning & Policy   
                            -  J6 Communications Systems   
                            -  J7 Training & Exercises   
                            -  J8 Resources & Assessment   
                            -  J9 Pacific Outreach   

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector GeneralAccessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JULIO CESAR MARTINEZ-OCASIO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 78 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. Although counsel was negligent, Petitioner is 

entitled to a counsel-filed Petition for Allowance of Appeal. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122. 

Counsel is DIRECTED to file the already-prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

within five days.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1428 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1428

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2017

   Mr. Hurd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US Soldiers, South Korea Conduct First Combined Short Range Air Defense Exercise on Korean Peninsula

By Capt. Jonathon Daniell

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### JOHN W. GORDON v. SAMUEL J. LOWTHER and wife.

Owners of executory bequests and other contingent interests cannot re cover damages for waste already committed. They are entitled, however, to have their interest protected from threatened waste or destruc tion by injunctive relief.

*{Braswell*v. *Moreheacl,*Bush. Eq., S3 ; *DoutJiet*v. *Bodenhammer, 4*Jones Eq., 444 ; *Watson*v. *Watson,*3 Jones Eq., 400, cited and approved.)

This was a Civil Action, application for an Injunction, tried before his Honor, Judge Eure, at the Fall Term, 1875,, of Gates Superior Court.

*195child or children to arrive at the above age, my desire is that they shall have it after her death.”

This makes the defendant, Martha Lowther, a tenant for life, with a contingent remainder in fee to such child or children as she may have, who live to the age of twenty-one years, with an executory devise over to the plaintiff in the event that no child of Martha Lowther lives to the age of twenty-one years.

The allegations of the complaint are that the defendants, at various times, from 1863 to 1875, have sold timber trees from the land and have torn down buildings, and have allowed the farm, to go to ruin ; thereby committing voluntary and allowing permissive waste; and that the defendants are now, at the time of commencing this action, still committing waste by selling timber trees from the land, and that the injury to the estate of inheritance is equal to the value of the life estate.

And, therefore, the plaintiff brings this action:

1st. To restrain waste; 2d, to recover damages for the ■waste already committed. The defendants demur.

While owners of executory bequests and other contingent interests cannot recover damages for waste already committed, they are entitled to have their interests protected from threatened waste or destruction by injunctive relief.

This is clear, both upon principle and authority. *Braswell*v. *Morehead,*Busbee Eq., 26; *Douthet*v. *Bodenhammer,*4 Jones Eq., 444; *Watson*v. *Watson,*3 Jones Eq., 400.

Inasmuch as Martha Lowther is now fifty-two years of age, has been married twelve years and has never had a child, and admits by the demurrer the waste charged in the complaint, this would seem to be a very proper case for such relief.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Let this be certified, <fcc.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 22, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0106. KENNETH BRADLEY BARNES v. MELANIE CHEEK BARNES. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV0062
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Legend International
Holdings,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"report"), the undersigned, Joseph Isaac Gutnick, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: March 29, 2006

                                         /s/ Joseph Isaac Gutnick
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Joseph Isaac Gutnick
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)