alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20858 and #20859; SEMINOLE TRIBE of FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20018]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Seminole Tribe of Florida (FEMA-4844-DR), dated November 5, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Milton.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 20, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         October 5, 2024, through November 2, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         August 5, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Seminole Tribe of Florida, dated November 5, 2024, is hereby amended to update the incident period for this disaster as beginning October 5, 2024, and continuing through November 2, 2024.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-27690 Filed 11-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 680 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-345, K2025-343.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26623 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
#### Allen’s Ex’rs. *v.*Montfort Stokes.

A plea to tlie juris liction of the Court under the act of 1793 Rev• c. 392, is to be decided as to the amount for which the suit is brought, only by the writ and declaration.

Debt. The bond was foe one hundred pounds, but reduced by payments, as the Defendant aliedged, to about thirty .pounds; he pleaded to the jurisdiction of the Court according to the act of 1793, c. 19, which directs that from and after the passing of this act, no suit, shall he originally commenced in any of the Superior Courts in this State for any debt or demaud of less value than one hundred pounds, where the Plaintiff and Defendant lived in the same district; or ¡for less than fifty pounds, where the parties lived in different districts; and if any suit shall be commenced contrary to the true intent and meaning hereof, or if any person shall demand a greater smn than is due, on purpose to evade this act; in either case, the Plaiafiff shall be non-suited and pay costs : and the Defendant set forth in his plea, that the real and true demand of the Plaintiff was of less value than fifty pounds ; to which plea there was a replication and issue* *.El per curiam,*Judge A~he and Judge Wiuiams — This is an issue to be determined by the Court, and that, the writ and declaration was proof of the amount of the Plaintiff's demand, and as the sum demanded in the Writ and declaration was above the sum of fifty pounds, they ordered a *respondeas ouster. Quere de hoc.*

Note. — Vide *Sur. Part. of McNaugton & Co. v. Hunter, post*454. *Bell v. Bell,*1 *Mur. 95. McGhee*v. *Draughon*& *Jordan,*2 *Car. Luw Rep.*260.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001002396
<NAME>                          Million Dollar Saloon, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                               1
<CURRENCY>                                                        US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                            1
<CASH>                                                                724421
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            900
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                            24948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      833110
<PP&E>                                                               3585568
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       1670833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       2756875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 146142
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                5732
<OTHER-SE>                                                           2465753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         2756875
<SALES>                                                              1976413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     2316963
<CGS>                                                                1192441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         819088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      2129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       323524
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          100000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   223524
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          223524
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.04



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     FDS to Issuer's Current Report on Form 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
                                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         27,670
<SECURITIES>                                   532,813 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                   77,400
<INVENTORY>                                    263,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,776,261
<PP&E>                                         58,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0                               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,907,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,190
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71,372
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,166,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,907,074
<SALES>                                        226,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,349,130
<CGS>                                          180,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,754,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (63,793)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,337,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,974
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,340,022)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.34)
        



</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 8th TSC Year In Review

By Capt. Adam Cartier8th TSC

                ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Bennett, Respondent, vs. Bennett, Appellant.

*May 20*

June *21, 1938.*

*403The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Bagley, Spohn, Ross & Stevens*of Madison, and for the respondent on that of *Roberts, Roe & Boardman*of Madison.

Fairchild, J.

Beyond question, the circuit court for Dane county has jurisdiction over the custody of the children of this severed marriage, sec. 247.24, Stats. The question raised by the appellant as to whether there was an abuse of discretion in granting to the father, who had the custody of the children under an order of the court, permission to take the children from the state of Wisconsin and physically out of this jurisdiction, must be answered against the appellant. The father has an opportunity of employment in New York at a larger salary and with prospect of advancement. His reasons for moving were investigated by the court below and were found to be sufficient. For the father to- have the advantage of this opportunity was found to be consistent with the welfare of the children. In the order for change of residence there is provision for as full an opportunity of visitation by the mother as the circumstances warrant, and the evidence concerning the condition of the children under the father’s care is convincing that the wiser course is to- leave them with him. The arrangement for the boys to visit their *404mother during the summer is just, considering the means of the parents.

The circuit court of this state having jurisdiction of the parties, comity and the full-faith-and-credit clause of the federal constitution may be relied upon to furnish assurance of the recognition of its orders in other states. *Morill v. Morill*(1910), 83 Conn. 479, 77 Atl. 1; *Wakefield v. Ives*(1872), 35 Iowa, 238; *Stetson v. Stetson*(1888), 80 Me. 483, 15 Atl. 60; *State ex rel. Nipp v. District Court*(1912), 46 Mont. 425, 128 Pac. 590.

The hardships which appellant says have been visited upon her are but difficulties which inevitably must accompany the distressing situation in which she finds herself. We cannot say that any finding by the court is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence or that in any respect there has been an abuse of discretion.

*By the Court.*— The orders are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1349 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1349

    To amend the Wilderness Act to ensure that the use of bicycles, 
wheelchairs, strollers, and game carts is not prohibited in Wilderness 
                     Areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

Mr. McClintock (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Westerman, and Mr. Pearce) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Wilderness Act to ensure that the use of bicycles, 
wheelchairs, strollers, and game carts is not prohibited in Wilderness 
                     Areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN WHEELED DEVICES NOT PROHIBITED IN WILDERNESS 
              AREAS.

    Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``Nothing in this section shall 
prohibit the use of motorized wheelchairs, non-motorized wheelchairs, 
non-motorized bicycles, strollers, wheelbarrows, survey wheels, 
measuring wheels, or game carts within any wilderness area.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Richard Saviano, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[774 NYS2d 82]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants City of New York and the New York City Police Department appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated October 11, 2002, which denied the cross motion of the defendant City of New York for sum*582mary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant New York City Police Department is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the order appealed from *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant City of New York; and it is further,

Ordered that upon searching the record, summary judgment is granted to the New York City Police Department and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against that defendant; and it is further,

Ordered that the action against the remaining defendants is severed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant City of New York.

This action arose from an automobile accident on the Belt Parkway. A New York City Sanitation Department (hereinafter Sanitation Department) truck was involved in an accident with another vehicle on the parkway. Sanitation Department employees and New York City Police Department (hereinafter the NYPD) officers arrived to assess the damage and to secure the scene of the accident. Shortly thereafter the defendant Andre Blackburn, who had consumed several glasses of wine before driving, came upon the scene. After observing the vehicles stopped on the parkway, Blackburn fell asleep and his car struck the rear of the vehicles which were present at the scene of the first accident. The evidence demonstrated that any alleged negligence of the City and the NYPD in failing to properly secure the area of the first accident merely set the scene for the second accident, but was not the proximate cause of the accident *(see Ely v Pierce,*302 AD2d 489 [2003]; *Comolli v 81 & 13 Cortland Assoc.,*285 AD2d 863 [2001]). Therefore, the City’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Since the actions of the NYPD are identical to those of the City and the NYPD is a subdivision of a municipality, the same considerations apply to both the NYPD and the City. Under those circumstances, we search the record and grant summary judgment to the NYPD *(see Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp.,*90 NY2d 966 [1997]; *Miller v State of New York,*62 NY2d 506 [1984]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., Philippines Conduct Maritime Security Review

U.S. Embassy in the Philippines

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
exv10w3







Exhibit 10.3




APOLLO GROUP, INC.

4025 SOUTH RIVERPOINT PARKWAY

PHOENIX, AZ 85040




September 29,
2010



Mr. Charles B. Edelstein

c/o Apollo Group, Inc.

3025 South RiverPoint Parkway

Phoenix, AZ 85040




Dear Chas:



Under the terms of your existing Employment Agreement with Apollo Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
dated July 7, 2008 and subsequently amended on several separate occasions (the “Employment
Agreement”), you may become entitled to certain severance benefits should your employment with the
Company terminate under certain specified circumstances. However, in order for you to actually
receive any severance benefits under those circumstances, you must execute and deliver a general
release of all claims you may have against the Company and its affiliates.



The purpose of this letter is to resolve any potential ambiguity that might otherwise arise as to
the impact which that release requirement would have upon the commencement date of the payment of
any such severance benefits to which you may become entitled under your Employment Agreement,
whether payable in cash or equity, in the event the delayed commencement date provisions of
Section 14(b) of your Employment Agreement were not otherwise applicable at that time. As a point
of clarification in that event, each of the references in your Employment Agreement to “any
applicable revocation period” is intended to refer to the maximum applicable review/delivery and
revocation periods to which you are entitled under your Employment Agreement and applicable law
with respect to the release. That maximum aggregate period will accordingly be used to determine
the date (and taxable year) for the commencement of such severance benefits, and no such severance
benefits will be paid until that maximum aggregate review/delivery and revocation periods have
expired. In no event will you have the opportunity to determine the taxable year in which such
severance benefits will commence.



Except for the clarifications set forth in this letter, all the terms and provisions of your
Employment Agreement will continue in full force and effect.




	 	 	 

	/s/ Fred Newton
 

Fred Newton

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Title: Executive Vice President, Human Resources
	 	 






 









 






APPROVAL



I hereby approve and accept the clarifying changes to my Employment Agreement set forth above.




	 	 	 

	/s/ Charles B. Edelstein
 

Charles B. Edelstein

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Dated: September 28, 2010