alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40438 Conference Calendar

__________________
DON WAYNE BASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; JOHN STICE, Deputy Director; LESLIE W. WOODS, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-41

--------------------- December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Don Wayne Basey moves this court for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.No. 95-40438 -2-
Because Basey does not challenge whether the district court properly dismissed his action for failure to file a complete application for IFP status, but instead argues the merits of his claims, he has not addressed the proper issue on appeal. The district court did not, however, abuse its discretion in dismissing Basey's action without prejudice. Basey fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Basey's motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. Basey argues, as he has previously, that prison officials intentionally delayed information to allow him to timely complete his IFP application in the district court. His contention is without merit. Basey is setting a pattern of abuse that will not be tolerated. Accordingly, Basey is hereby sanctioned in the amount of $100, and he is barred from filing any further civil,
pro se , in forma pauperis appeals in this court, without the advance written permission of a judge of this court, until the sanction is paid. Basey is cautioned to avoid any filings with this meritless contention.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Bombers Project Power from the Last Frontier, Once Again

By Tech. Sgt. Jerilyn Quintanilla354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27198]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 462 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-402, K2025-400.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27198 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00629]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8595]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Italian Futurism, 1909-1944: Reconstructing the 
Universe''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Italian Futurism, 1909-1944: 
Reconstructing the Universe,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, 
NY, from on or about February 21, 2014, until on or about September 1, 
2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 9, 2014.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00629 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2413

KASANGISHA PAPY KABANGU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-282-521)

Submitted: November 8, 2006 Decided: November 30, 2006

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright,

OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION; Karen E. Torrent, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kasangisha Papy Kabangu, a native and citizen of the

Democratic Republic of Congo, petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to

reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the

immigration judge’s denial of his request for asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to

reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435

F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition

for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re:

Kabangu, No. A96-282-521 (B.I.A. Nov. 29, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Air Defense Soldier Inducted into Sergeant Audie Murphy Club

By Sgt. Malcolm Cohens-Ashley

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
23Sep2011

Maverick Helicopters, Inc. and Maverick Airstar, LLC are seeking relief from 14 CFR Part 93.323 and is asking for an exemption from that part of 14 CFR Part 93.323 which requires the filing of f light plans prior to conducting operations in the vicinity of Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP) , AZ. The pertinent parts of the “Las Vegas Flight Standards District Office Grand Canyon National Park Special Flight Rules Area Procedures Manual” will continue to be adhered to regarding reporting on a q uarterly basis until the referenced document is revised or rescinded
. The following is submitted as justification for issuance of the requested exemption: 1. Flight locating is done within the company using the satellite based tracking system, “Outerlink” , providing superior flight locating and monitoring as required by our GOM and in compliance with FAR Part 135
. Flight locating procedures are in place and being used with each flight into the GCNP SFAR50
- 2 airspace. 2. The filing of flight plans prior to operation within the GCNP area is required as an auditing resource and not for flight locating
. It is not done for “safety of flight”. 3
. The filing of referenced flight plans is a duplication of the information contained in quarterly GCNP operations reporting and is more than suspect if used for auditing purposes
. It does not reference other parent data sources to validate quarterly report data. 4 . There are many other more accurate method s of auditing the q uarterly allocation report (14 CFR Part 93.325) than to use the FAA FSS as and accounting office . These can be demonstrated with p ossible audit options that will provide for more than adequate oversight by the responsible agency. These methods would meet the GAAP standards for accounting and b e a more exact assessment of the validity of the quarterlyreport which by Part 93.323 has never been used because of

questionable/tainted data. 5. The exemption would cut the duties of the FSS from being an accounting office/ tool and allow them focus on their primary task of being a flight following agency , thus lowering its operational cost and increasing its cap ability to perform its needed safety task. The technical aspects would also be eliminated allowing flights to depart o n time instead of being d elayed because of a busy fax machine, adding to a better stream
- lined operation and an increase in safety. Also, the exemption puts the burden of proof on the user not the oversight agency. Your kind attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Dale Cowley Steve Hall Director of Operations Director of Operations Maverick Helicopters, Inc. Maverick Airstar, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                           	                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       1,012,684
<SECURITIES>                                                    38,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                               	   35,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                                	        0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             1,090,760
<PP&E>                                                          18,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   4,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               1,436,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          183,361
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                         1,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0         
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         	         1,251,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 1,436,812
<SALES>                                                         29,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               134,922
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   63,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 80,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             80,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    80,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
10.4


LETTER
OF REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY




As of
November 11, 2009





TO:
            Manufacturers
      and Traders Trust Company


One
      M & T Plaza, Buffalo, New York
14240





RE:           REAFFIRMATION
of Guaranty of All Liability (the "Guaranty") of OG ACQUISITION, INC., COMBINE BUYING
GROUP, INC. AND 1725758 ONTARIO INC. D/B/A THE OPTICAL
GROUP  to MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST
COMPANY (the “Bank") dated as of August 7, 2007 in connection with loans
made to EMERGING VISION, INC. (“Borrower”) by Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company (collectively, the “Loan”).





Dear
Sirs:





The
undersigned hereby reaffirm and ratify all the terms, conditions,
representations, and covenants contained in the Guaranty, certify that there are
no defenses, offsets, or counterclaims thereto as of the date hereof and
represent, warrant, and covenant that the most recent financial statements
heretofore delivered to you are true and correct in all respects, fairly present
the financial condition of the undersigned as of the date thereof and that no
material adverse change has occurred in the financial condition reflected
therein since the date thereof.





Each of
the undersigned further covenants and agrees (i) that its liability under the
Guaranty is unaffected by the execution of that certain ALLONGE TO NOTE and that
certain LIMITED WAIVER AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT evidencing, among other things,
(i) the reduction of the Principal amount of the Loan as set forth therein and
(ii) the waiver of certain financial covenants for fiscal period ended 9/30/09,
and any related documents dated of even date herewith, copies of which the
undersigned acknowledge having received and reviewed and (ii) that the Guaranty
is in full force and effect.





Very
truly yours,





GUARANTORS:





OG
ACQUISITION, INC.





By:           /s/ Brian P.
Alessi


Name: Brian P. Alessi


Title: Chief Financial
Officer








COMBINE
BUYING GROUP, INC.





By:           /s/ Brian P.
Alessi


Name: Brian P. Alessi


Title: Chief Financial
Officer







1725758
ONTARIO INC. D/B/A THE OPTICAL GROUP





By:           /s/ Brian P.
Alessi


Name: Brian P. Alessi


Title: Chief Financial
Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: STEPHEN W. JOHNSON AND

REUBEN R. RIOS,

 Relators.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-10-00078-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Relators’ unopposed motion to dismissthis original proceeding. 

The motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

December 8, 2010

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Chew, C.J., not participating
```

[Federal Register: May 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 96)]
[Notices]               
[Page 28095]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19my10-120]                         

[[Page 28095]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7017]

 
Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``E Ku Ana Ka Paia: Unification, Responsibility and the 
Ku Images''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``E Ku Ana Ka Paia: Unification, 
Responsibility and the Ku Images,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The 
object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner 
or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit object at the Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, from on or about 
June 5, 2010, until on or about October 4, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12000 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### STATE ON RELATION OF JOHN L. FAIRLEY *vs.*STEPHEN WALL & OTHERS.

Gaston, J.

As this case is, in all respects, except as to •parties, the same with that brought on the relation of *Alex under Little against these defendants,*(supra p. 272) there must be the same judgment in it.

Per Chhiam, Judgment affirmed.
#### Mary Lou Castrigno, Appellant, v Leonard Castrigno, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 759]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 26, 1989, the former wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.) dated April 5, 1994, which denied her motion to amend the parties’ qualified domestic relations order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the former wife’s mo*695tion to modify the qualified domestic relations order *(see,*26 USC 414 [p]; 29 USC 1056 [d]) that was included in the parties’ agreement dated March 23, 1989. The proposed modification would have substantively changed a provision of the order by eliminating the conditions under which an increase in the former husband’s pension benefits would entitle the former wife to a recalculation of her share of those benefits *(see, Christian v Christian,*42 NY2d 63, 71-72). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the Company) and I,
Rick E. Russo, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by this Report.



/s/ Mark J. EmkjerMark J. EmkjerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Rick E. RussoRick E. RussoSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 6, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the
Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report and irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.