alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Stantec Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the
Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Robert J. Gomes, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                             |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 25, 2015 |  | /s/ Robert J. Gomes                                         |  | 
|                        |  | ROBERT J. GOMES, P. ENG President &
Chief Executive Officer |  |
No. 82-725.

#### Gilboe *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Pacific Dragon 2022 Concludes 

By Courtesy StoryCommander, U.S. 3rd Fleet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
**Trial 1 Trial 2**  **Trial 3**

Shipments 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Average Rated Wattage 104 104 104 Percent Variable Speed (Assume ECM) 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% Hours per Year 2,167 3,170 2,167 TWh 0.33 0.49 0.33 Percent Savings from ECM (Constant Full Load) 45% 45% 45% TWh Savings (Switching to ECM, Full Load) 0.15 0.22 0.15 Lifetime 10 10 10 Quads Savings Over 30 Years **0.38 0.55**  **0.38** Electricity Cost 0.115 $ 0.115

$ 0.115

$ Annual Elec Cost Savings 11.66 $ 17.06

$ 11.66

$
Incremental Motor Cost $112.50 $112.50 $71.81 **Payback (years) 9.6**  **6.6 6.2**  Assumptions

Percent Potable Recirc 22% 22% 22% Percent Hydronic Heating 78% 78% 78% Operating Hours Potable Recirc 2,190 5,475 2,190 Operating Hours Hydronic Heating 2,160 2,520 2,160

**Literature Range** Min Mid Max Potable Water Recirc 2,190 5,475 7,300 Hydronic Heating 2,160 2,520 3,000

**Sources** : John Siegenthaler presentation, NYSERDA report, TACO white papers, CA IOUs estimate, manufacturer estimates

Percent Savings Running ECM at 80% Speed Compared to AC Induction at Full Speed 73% **1/25 - 1/4 HP**

Assume power draw is constant across loads.**Trial 4**

1,500,000 104 2.6% 3,170
0.49
45%
0.22
10
**0.55**
0.115 $
17.06 $

$71.81
**4.2**

22% 78% 5,475 2,520

: John Siegenthaler presentation, NYSERDA report, TACO white papers, CA IOUs estimate, manufacturer estimates Assume power draw is constant across loads.
#### In re Thomas BOFFEY, Louise Boffey & Margaret Boffey, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 80-00855-BKC-TCB.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

Aug. 11, 1981.

*3Raymond B. Ray, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for P. L. & G. Enterprises, Inc.

William Layton, West Palm Beach, Fla., for second mortgagee.

Daniel L. Bakst, West Palm Beach, Fla., for trustee.

Sam Costa, Jr., Boca Raton, Fla., for buyers of real property.

Richard W. Smith, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Robert C. Furr, Boca Raton, Flai, co-counsel, for debtors.

ORDER ON MORTGAGEE’S APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY’S FEE

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor’s principal asset was certain commercial property. The property has been liquidated by the trustee. It was encumbered by various liens, including a second mortgage of $180,000. The mortgage note provides for the reasonable costs of collection including attorney’s fees. This creditor’s attorney, William Layton received an award of $10,000 for his services in the enforcement of this lien in a State court proceeding before bankruptcy. The foreclosure was interrupted by bankruptcy. He now seeks an additional $5,000 for his services during bankruptcy. That sum of money has been escrowed by the trustee from the sale proceeds pending determination of this application.

The application, which was opposed, was heard on August 4. Although no time records were kept, it was agreed that counsel spent 50 hours in this representation, and that his customary billing rate for services of this nature was from $100 to $120 per hour during this period. From the date of the bankruptcy petition until the sale of the property covered an interval of six months during most of which the case was in chapter 11. A plan was ultimately presented and confirmation was denied. Much of counsel’s time was spent in following the proceedings, including about 20 hours in attendance at various hearings relating to the plan.

The creditor never filed an adversary proceeding nor formally sought any other relief in this case. Its recovery of its lien was never in doubt. Counsel did produce evidence bearing upon the feasibility of the debtor’s plan which furnished one of the bases for denial of confirmation. Other parties also resisted confirmation.

I agree with the objector that this representation did not reasonably require the services of this highly qualified attorney. This was work for a junior associate. It is probable that at least one-third of the time devoted to this matter was spent in attendance awaiting the call of this particular matter. When one is over-qualified for a task, he cannot expect the same compensation he receives for services that require his special skill, particularly when the attorney is to be paid, not by his client, but by someone else who has no control over those services. I find that a reasonable fee for the services rendered on behalf of this mortgagee since bankruptcy in this court is $3,000.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                      PIXAR

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                 September 30,           September 30,
                                              ------------------     --------------------
                                               1997       1996        1997         1996
                                              ------     -------     -------     --------
<S>                                            <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>  
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding                                 41,717      38,698      40,913       38,445
Common stock equivalents                       7,176       8,016       7,525        8,528
                                              ------     -------     -------     --------
Total shares used in computing net income
  (loss) per share                            48,893      46,714      48,438       46,973
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========

Net income from continuing operations         $3,559     $10,224     $17,713     $ 21,247
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
Net income per share from continuing         
operations                                    $ 0.07     $  0.22     $  0.37     $   0.45
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations                                    $  113     $  (624)    $    36     $   (578)
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
Net income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations                       $ 0.01     $ (0.01)    $  0.00     $  (0.01)
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
Net income                                    $3,672     $ 9,600     $17,749     $ 20,669
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
Net income per share                          $ 0.08     $  0.21     $  0.37     $   0.44
                                              ======     =======     =======     ========
</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US Military Personnel, Aircraft Attend Aerospace & Defence Exposition and Airshow 19

U.S. Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
**Exhibit 10.1****Summary of Lease Agreement between Micromet AG and GEK****GrundstücksverwaltungsgesellschaftmbH & Co. Objekt Eins KG, dated 09./10.12.2002**     Effective as of July 1, 2002, Micromet AG has rented an area of 7,349 square meters, orapproximately 79,000 square feet, for a fixed term of 10 years in order to perform its businessoperations in a new building which has been particularly developed for biotech companies. Under thelease agreement, Micromet AG had the option to increase its rentable area by an additional 2,700square meters, but this option was not exercised and has since expired.     Currently, regular monthly payments are equal to (i) EUR 144,882.22, or approximately $190,000as of March 7, 2007, plus Germany’s Value Added Tax (VAT) (currently at the rate of 16%), forrentable area and parking places, and (ii) EUR 30,867.77, or approximately $41,000 as of March 7,2007, for ancillary expenses (similar to operating expenses reimbursed to commercial lessors in theUnited States). The lease payments are subject to annual increases based upon the German GeneralPrice Index, similar to the U.S. Consumer Price Index, and the ancillary expenses are subject toincreases based on Micromet’s consumption.     In the event of a default under the terms of the lease agreement which results in prematuretermination of the lease agreement, Micromet AG is obligated to reimburse GEK for laboratoryfixtures provided exclusively for Micromet. The original obligation was EUR 511,291.88, orapproximately $671,000 as of March 7, 2007, and the reimbursement costs are prorated over the lifeof the lease and, as such, decrease in equal annual amounts so that no reimbursement will remainupon expiration of the lease agreement. Micromet was required to deliver a deposit equal to 3months’ gross rent, which will be reimbursed after expiration of the lease term unless amounts arewithheld to cover renovation costs of GEK. Pursuant to the lease agreement, Micromet AG wasentitled to terminate the agreement effective as of June 30, 2007 in the event of a majorimpairment in its economic situation, but Micromet AG waived this special termination right in anamendment to the lease dated 09./16.06.2005. Subject to the conditions of the lease agreement, thelease agreement is no longer terminable by Micromet AG prior to the expiration of its term.     In the amendment to the lease agreement dated 09./16.06.2005, Micromet and GEK agreed upon apartial and temporary deferral of monthly payments in 2005 and 2006, which amounts deferred wouldbe charged interest at a rate of 4% per annum. The total amount of the deferred payment in 2005 wasEUR 350,000, plus VAT, and EUR 145,833.35 in 2006. Amounts deferred, together with an interestpayment in the amount of EUR 13,567.07, for a total of approximately $623,000, were repaid to GEKon June 22, 2006.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Snow and Ice Control 2019

By Senior Airman Kevin West374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1410 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall 

Interceptor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nogales Wastewater 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, 

7 OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section: 

9 (1) AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘Agreement’’ 

10 means the memorandum of agreement between the 

11 United States Section of the International Boundary 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1410 IH

1 and Water Commission and the City of Nogales, Ar2 izona, dated January 20, 2006. 

3 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 

4 Nogales, Arizona. 

5 (3) NOGALES SANITATION PROJECT.—The term 

6 ‘‘Nogales sanitation project’’ means the project 

7 owned by the City and the United States Section of 

8 the International Boundary and Water Commission 

9 and includes— 

10 (A) the International Outfall Interceptor 

11 (IOI) and the trunkline; and 

12 (B) the Nogales International Wastewater 

13 Treatment Plant (NIWTP). 

14 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con15 gress that, pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 

16 U.S.C. 277d–10 et seq.), and notwithstanding the Agree17 ment, an equitable proportion of the costs of operation and 

18 maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be con19 tributed by the City should be based on the average daily 

20 volume of wastewater originating from the City. 

21 (c) CAPITAL COSTS EXCLUDED.—Pursuant to the 

22 Agreement and the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 

23 277d–10 et seq.), the City shall have no obligation to con24 tribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading the 

25 Nogales sanitation project. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1410 IH

1 (d) OVERCHARGES.—Notwithstanding the Agree2 ment, the United States Section of the International 

3 Boundary and Water Commission shall not charge the 

4 City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 

5 and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion 

6 of the costs, as described in subsection (b). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN GROVER

SELLERS ATTQRN6Y

GENERIL Hon. R. F. Robinson 'coullt~, Attorney UillaoJcmLi.i* Ragmmdvllle, Texas n Dear Sir:

and Rovember 3, OS this departa basis of faots are quotedas ads in part as property

held or owxmd.by 11 be liableror all State owner thereoi,

illol~ tax propert axid

poll tax. . . . 1 er authorit of the above statute the lllaqj-County

hwrefksed to aooept r of real estateor all taxesagainst on the grcmnd that a poll,tax has been the wife of said owner, the owner said poll tax vith his other taxes. "Klndl~ adtise,at your earliest oonvenienoe, whetherthe Tax Goll.e.otor Is justiiied

in reiusing

the tender~undim

the abov6 oiroumstanoea."-. 365



### Ron..R.

**F.** 

### Robinstin,

plrgq 2



## to pay $he taxes

### assisse& a&iinst the iaaei



### uitheut

at 

### the Same 

### t* ylngthepolltu assessed 

### a Ye think

8s pctsitien

is swklneU ,in

S ei %mthQ Mfei Bb v1 ltabba 207 &W-636, 

### holding thatthe 8tak does not 

### havea'lien onrealprapertyto

~bimrethepbymsnt

0rmh0~p0rs~l PrOPerCy

or 

### pollme8 dw bJ th0 omer Of the 18d.

### 366 

## y;;. _.. .. Eon. R. B. Robi.rqon, page 3 SumarisIng our oonolwlon, we hold that the %3xColleota is withinUs legal rights to retire the pamnt of the poll tax assessed against

both the husband aad the vtfe in the paJaant,of State end Countyad valorem taxes assessed

againstthe oormnrnit~ property,

other than I the-hsmestcurd. Bat if the property @e the separate property~of

the hu∧ he may pay the State- and Cmty -. ~a& taleremtaxes thereon without

paylug the poll t+ * . ~'a2isessed

against

his pife. * I:,

. W-3 t=W Jaurs 4'; ".," .: ATToRm GRREUL **OF** TRXAS

-.
TS – 11KK4D, Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, PBT Profiler Estimates

Redacted
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1385 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1385

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit recruitment and 
retention bonuses for employees who spend certain durations of time on 
                 official time, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

   Ms. Foxx introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit recruitment and 
retention bonuses for employees who spend certain durations of time on 
                 official time, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Service Incentives Integrity 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN BONUSES.

    (a) Recruitment and Relocation Bonuses.--
            (1) In general.--Section 5753 of title 5, United States 
        Code, is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (g) by inserting ``or the bonus 
                is subject to retraction under subsection (h)'' before 
                the period at the end; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) A bonus awarded under this section shall be retracted and 
subject to repayment under subsection (g) in any case in which an 
employee has spent at least 80 percent of the time such employee would 
otherwise be in a duty status on official time granted under section 
7131 during the period ending on the date that is 6 months after the 
appointment or relocation of such employee, as applicable.''.
            (2) Applicability.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply with respect to any applicable bonus awarded on or 
        after October 1, 2017.
    (b) Retention Bonuses.--Section 5754(d) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(5)(A) A retention bonus may not be paid to an employee who, for 
a period of 6 consecutive months of service associated with the bonus, 
has spent at least 80 percent of the time such employee would otherwise 
be in a duty status on official time granted under section 7131.
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall apply with respect to any 6 
consecutive months of service beginning on or after October 1, 2017.''.
                                 <all>
```