alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  PHYTOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: May 14, 2007By:/s/ Greg WujekGreg Wujek
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0483 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEVIN CHARLES WALLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 5, 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 29 2023

12/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0483
No. 90-809.

#### Bernesser *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

James C. Holly and Kenneth R.
Taylor hereby certify as follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
Sierra Bancorp.

2. The Form 10-K of Sierra Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2010 complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Sierra Bancorp.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ James C. Holly                                                  
|Date           |  |  |  | James C. Holly President &
Chief Executive Officer                  
|               |  | 
|March 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth R. Taylor                                               
|Date           |  |  |  | Kenneth R. Taylor Executive
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Final Rule Technical Support

Document: Residential

Dishwashers, Dehumidifiers,

and Cooking Products, and

Commercial Clothes Washers

This report provides the technical analysis and

results in support of the information presented

in the final rule for residential dishwashers,

dehumidifiers, and cooking products, and

commercial clothes washers.

Some of the following documents are available

as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe

Reader.

Title Page (PDF 24 KB)

Table of Contents (PDF 32 KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1. Introduction (PDF 116 KB)

Chapter 2. Analytical Framework

(PDF 208 KB)

Chapter 3. Market and Technology

Assessment (PDF 1.2 MB)

Chapter 4. Screening Analysis (PDF 92

KB)

Chapter 5. Engineering Analysis

(PDF 580 KB)

Chapter 6. Energy and Water Use

Determination (PDF 332 KB)

Chapter 7. Markups for Equipment Price

Determination (PDF 220 KB)

Chapter 8. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback

Period Analysis (PDF 1.6 MB)

Chapter 9. Trial Standard Levels

(PDF 56 KB)

Chapter 10. Shipments Analysis

(PDF 768 KB)

Chapter 11. National Impact Analysis

(PDF 872 KB)

Chapter 12. Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group

Analysis (PDF 428 KB)

Chapter 13. Manufacturer Impact

Analysis (PDF 948 KB)

Chapter 14. Utility Impact Analysis

(PDF 608 KB)

Chapter 15. Employment Impact

Analysis (PDF 96 KB)

Chapter 16. Environmental Impact

Analysis (PDF 492 KB)

Chapter 17. Regulatory Impact Analysis

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Final Rule Technical ... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/...

1 of 2 5/6/2009 1:44 PM

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 64.2
(PDF 232 KB)

Appendix 5A AHAM Data Submittal

(PDF 336 KB)

Appendix 6A Cooktops and Ovens:

Determination of Energy-Using

Components (PDF 124 KB)

Appendix 8A User Instructions for LCC

and PBP Spreadsheets (PDF 56 KB)

Appendix 8B Uncertainty and Variability

(PDF 48 KB)

Appendix 8C Lifetime Distributions

(PDF 76 KB)

Appendix 8D Household Discount Rate

Distributions (PDF 236 KB)

Appendix 10A Relative Price Elasticity of

Demand for Appliances (PDF 288 KB)

Appendix 11A User Instructions for

Shipments and NIA Spreadsheets

(PDF 44 KB)

Appendix 11B National Equipment and

Operating Costs (PDF 372 KB)

Appendix 13A Manufacturer Impact

Analysis Interview Guides (PDF 192 KB)

Appendix 13B Government Regulatory

Impact Model (GRIM) (PDF 60 KB)

Appendix 14A Interpolation of Utility

and Environmental Results from

NEMS-BT Output (PDF 48 KB)

Appendix 17A Regulatory Impact

Analysis Supporting Material (PDF 208

KB)

Contact Information

Stephen Witkowski, P.E.

Project Manager

(202) 586-7463

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 04/30/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Final Rule Technical ... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/...

2 of 2 5/6/2009 1:44 PM

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 64.2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20761 and #20762; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number SC-20014]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4835-DR), dated September 29, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Debby.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 20, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         August 4, 2024 through August 22, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of South Carolina, dated September 29, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Beaufort, Florence.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-27637 Filed 11-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1848

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Maurice Malone, also known as Tito

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque

____________

 Submitted: October 14, 2016

Filed: October 19, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Malone appeals the sentence the district court imposed after revoking

1

his supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court

affirms.

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa.
The district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Merrival,

521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence

isreviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). The within-Guidelinesrange sentence was not substantively unreasonable, and the court considered the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.

2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence

within Guidelines range); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009)

(under substantive-reasonablenesstest, district court abusesits discretion if it failsto

consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant

factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing factors). 

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001002637
<NAME> MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,303
<SECURITIES>                                    37,370
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,417
<PP&E>                                          41,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,413)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,978
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (107,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (107,745)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (107,745)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# DOD Leaders Brief Congress on IT, Cybersecurity, Information Assurance

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### RICHARD CULBERTSON, EX'R, *against*SAMUEL FROST AND OTHERS.

A bequest to J., “to go to her after her husbands’s death, and if she dies before him, I allow *her part*to go to her sons (naming them) when they come to the age of twenty-one ” passes a present light to be enjoyed at the death of the husband with a limitation, over to the sons in the event of her dying before her husband.

Cause removed from the Spring Term 1854, of the Court of Equity of Rowan.

The hill was filed by the executor of Henry Robertson to obtain a construction of the testator’s will, and for instructions as to the disposition and management of the fund arising from the sale of the estate. Samuel Frost the husband of the legatee Jane, and the children of the said Jane, as well as the -other legatees in the will, are made parties defendant.

The .clause in the will upon which the advice of the court is ashed, is sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.

*Osborne*for plaintiff.

*Orange*for defendants.

Peakson J.

The testator-left him. surviving,his brother John, the children of a deceased brother', George, and his sister Jane, the wife of Samuel Frost. He directs that all his estate should be converted into money, and after payment of debts and funeral expenses, the fund is divided into three equal parts. He gives to his brother John one part; to the children of his brother George one part, and in regard to the other part, he expresses his intention in these words : “I give and bequeath to my sister Jane, one third of my estate, *to go to Tier*after her husband’s (Samuel Frost’s) death, and if she dies be*282fore him, I allow *her part*to go to her sons, Franklin R. Frost, James D. Frost, Ebenezer C. Frost, when they come to the age of twenty one years.”

The paramount intention tvas to give to his sister Jane one third of the fund. But he had a secondary intention, e. i. to exclude her husband from any benefit or control over her part. To effect this double purpose, he gives to his sister a *present right*to the fund, but poslpones the time of enjoyment until the death of her husband, and makes a limitation over in the event of her dying before her husband. Ilis right to make this restriction as to the time of enjoyment, and the validity of the limitation over, are fully settled by the authorities.

It must be declared to be the opinion of the court, that the executor is to retain the fund (upon investments so as to make interest.) to he paid over to the wife if she survives her husband : or to the children named (if she dies first) upon their arrival at the age of twenty one.

Per Curiam. Decree accordingly.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1093 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration and the Federal Transit 

Authority to provide appropriate Congressional notice of safety audits 

conducted with respect to railroads and rail transit agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 

Mr. SIRES (for himself and Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Railroad Administration and the Federal Transit Authority to provide appropriate Congressional notice of safety audits conducted with respect to 

railroads and rail transit agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTICE OF SAFETY AUDITS. 

4 (a) INITIAL NOTICE.—Not later than 10 days after 

5 beginning a safety audit of a railroad or rail transit agen6 cy, the Federal Railroad Administration or the Federal 

7 Transit Authority shall notify the Committee on Trans8 portation and Infrastructure of the House of RepresentaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:49 Feb 23, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1093.IH H1093

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1093 IH

1 tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

2 Transportation of the Senate, and each member of Con3 gress representing a State through which the railroad or 

4 transit agency operates service, of the beginning of that 

5 audit. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after comple7 tion of a safety audit described in subsection (a), the Fed8 eral Railroad Administration or the Federal Transit Au9 thority shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation 

10 and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 

11 the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

12 of the Senate, and to each member of Congress rep13 resenting a State through which the railroad or transit 

14 agency operates service, a report describing the results of 

15 that audit. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1150

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

  Mr. Holding (for himself and Mr. Peterson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                        indoor tanning services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON INDOOR TANNING SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 49 and by striking the item relating to 
such chapter in the table of chapters of such subtitle.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to services performed after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Appellant

v.

WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Cross-Appellant

______________________

2018-1400, 2018-1401, 2018-1402, 2018-1403, 2018-1537, 

2018-1540, 2018-1541

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-

01156, IPR2016-01157, IPR2016-01158, IPR2016-01159, 

IPR2017-00659, IPR2017-00709.

______________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

______________________

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, 

MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, 

HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Case: 18-1400 Document: 111 Page: 1 Filed: 09/04/2020
2 FACEBOOK, INC. v. WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC

O R D E R

Appellant Facebook, Inc. filed a combined petition for 

panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was 

first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, which 

granted the petition in part as indicated in the accompanying order. Thereafter, the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

2) The mandate of the court will issue on October 13, 

2020.

FOR THE COURT

 September 4, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 18-1400 Document: 111 Page: 2 Filed: 09/04/2020