alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 134 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Peach Bottom 2 Docket (050- 00277)

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 113 - Procedure / reference document development and maintenance LT D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 

417

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified G - Engineering G - Design 142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 147 - Individual corrective action LTA E - Electrical S - Surveillance 147 - Individual corrective action LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely E - Electrical S - Surveillance 

626

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements E - Electrical S - Surveillance 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 187 - Action implementation LTA E - Electrical G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA Q - Fire Protection 

D - Emergency Planning

189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA M - Maintenance / Repair 

M - Mechanical

190 - Failure to stop work / non-conservative decision making Q - Fire Protection 

D - Emergency Planning
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2008 to 12/31/2008Page 135 of 22605/29/2009 10:01:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Peach Bottom 2 Docket (050- 00277)

Work Planning & Practices / IR194 - Housekeeping LTA M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 

1357

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 23
exhibit10-28.htm


Exhibit 10.28


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE


 


OF ALL THE SHARES


 


OF CAPITAL STOCK OF COLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC.


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF ALL THE SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OF COLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC. (" Third Amendment") is made and entered into by and between COLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation ("Collins"), FRANK W. COLLINS and JOSHUA GOODSELL ("Sellers") and GEOBIO ENERGY, INC., a publicly-traded Colorado corporation ("Purchaser"), WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered into that certain Agreement for the Purchase of All the Shares of Capital Stock of Collins Construction, Inc., having an effective date of March 31, 2010 as amended by the First Amendment to Agreement for the Purchase of All the Shares of Capital Stock of Collins Construction, Inc. dated June 1, 2010 and the Second Amendment to Agreement for the Purchase of All the Shares of Capital Stock of Collins Construction, Inc. (the "Purchase Agreement"); and


 


WHEREAS, in accordance with the Second Amendment to the Purchase Agreement, Purchaser elected to extend the Closing Date until September 15, 2010; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of further extending Closing as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree to amend the Purchase Agreement as follows:


 


1. Closing will take place on or before November 30, 2010.


 


2. All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between the Purchase Agreement and this Third Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Third Amendment shall control.


 


This document may be executed in various counterparts, and when all parties have executed a copy hereof, the executed copies taken together shall be deemed to be the full and complete agreement of the parties.


 


The signature of any party transmitted electronically shall be deemed as valid and binding as all original signature.


 


[Signatures follow on next page]


 







 







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment the _____ day of September, 2010.


 


SELLERS:                                                                BUYER:


 


_____________________                                                                GEOBIO ENERGY, INC.,


Frank W. Collins, President                                                                           a publicly-traded Colorado Corporation







_____________________                                                                By:


Joshua Goodsell












COLLINS CONSTRUCTION, INC.


a Colorado corporation







By: ___________________________


Frank W. Collins, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-3-1999             JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999             MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                          61,504                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,237                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    378,776                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               907,308                       0
<PP&E>                                         443,157                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,976,210                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          463,440                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     691,338                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,976,210                       0
<SALES>                                      1,471,076               1,338,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,471,076               1,338,138
<CGS>                                        1,197,795               1,090,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,695                 235,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,468                  15,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,118                  (2,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,637                     301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,481                  (3,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,481                  (3,260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANI,

Respondent

v.

TYRONE DYVON SAVAGE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 273 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Supports Bangladesh’s Launch of Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
Order entered December 3 0 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01523
- CR
MARTIN ROBELES JIMEN EZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2
- 13
- 378 

### O RDER
The Court GRANTS court reporter Mary Ann Gilbert’s December 21, 2013 motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. We ORDER Ms. Gilbert to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY (30) DAYS from
the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
July 3, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JANTE LANGAN, Appellant

NO. 14-12-01134-CV V.

ERIC SCOTT LANGAN, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the Final Decree of Divorce, signed September 

13, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record 

and find no error in the Final Decree of Divorce. We order the Final Decree of 

Divorce of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Jante Langan, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 23
                      CONSENT OF ACCOUNTANT





CLYDE BAILEY P.C.
Certified Public Accountant
10924 Vance Jackson #404
San Antonio, Texas 78230
(210) 699-1287(ofc.)
(888) 699-1287 - (210) 691-2911 (fax)

Member:
American Institute of CPA's
Texas Society of CPA's




March 11, 2002

I consent to the use of my report, dated March 11, 2001, in the
Form 10KSB on the financial statements of Synreal Services Corp.,
dated December 31, 2001, included herein and to the reference made to
me.

/s/ Clyde Bailey
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              10,621
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (945)
<INVENTORY>                                         13,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    45,947
<PP&E>                                              42,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (29,577)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      77,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               40,390<F1>
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               367
<OTHER-SE>                                          33,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        77,924
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    79,180
<CGS>                                               57,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       28,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (905)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (7,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (7,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0

<FN>
Includes 18,304 convertible debt.
</FN>




</TABLE>
CONTROL NO.

MAYORASHLEY SWEARENGIN February 

### 25, 2010

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### 1200NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 

### 20590 Docket DOT·OST

### 20I

### 0·" Dear SecretaryLaHood: Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the OneWorld< Alliance <to compete effectively with the Star and Sky Team Alliances. This increased alliance competition will, in turn, enhance the benefits ofthe Department ofTransportation's Open Skies policy

- first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization acrossAsia. After a thorough review, we encourage the< Department of Transportation to approve this application as 

### it would enable these OneW6tld <Alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AAiJAL Alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and willhelp to ensure that customers continue to benefit from the competitiofrafforded by three competitive air alliances
..< We respectfully urge you to quickly approve

# this f}pplication.Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. i < Sincerely,
Ashley Swearen Russell C.W: mar, AAE Mayor Directorof viation <

CITY OF FRESNO CITY HALL • 

### 2600 FRESNO STREET • FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 

### 93721-3600 (559) 621-8000· FAX 

### (559) 621-7990· www.fresno.gov
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 2 7, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00024

- CR

Hector RODRIGU EZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR8869

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

State ’ s second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The State ’ s brief

is due on February 15, 2017.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Cite as Percio v. Smith , 2016-Ohio-3482.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY VALERIE PERCIO, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants

v. DAVID C. SMITH, et al. Defendant-Appellee : : : : : : : : : : C.A. CASE NO. 2015-CA-81

T.C. NO. 12-CV-491 (Civil Appeal from Common Pleas Court)

. . . . . . . . . . . O P I N I O N Rendered on the ___17th___ day of ____June____, 2016.

. . . . . . . . . . . BRYAN O. STEWARD, Atty. Reg. No. 0082014 and WILLIAM W. JOHNSTON, Atty. Reg. No. 0021772, 800 Cross Pointe Rd., Suite E, Gahanna, Ohio 43215 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants DAVID C. SMITH, 12811 E. National Road, South Vienna, Ohio 45369 Defendant-Appellee DENNIS HANEY, 12811 E. National Road, South Vienna, Ohio 45369 Defendant-Appellee

. . . . . . . . . . . . . FROELICH, J. {¶ 1} Valerie Percio appeals from a judgment of the Clark County Court of Common Pleas, which entered judgment in favor of Percio and Joan Grieco and against-2- Dennis Haney in the amount of $66,500. 1 The trial court’s judgment did not address the claims against David Smith, another defendant. {¶ 2} In a prior appeal, this court reversed the trial court’s June 5, 2013 judgment in favor of both Haney and Smith, and remanded for further proceedings. As a result of that reversal, the June 5, 2013 judgment in favor of Smith was no longer effective. Upon remand, the trial court was required to address the claims against both Smith and Haney in order to have a final appealable order. {¶ 3} Because the trial court’s judgment failed to dispose of the claims against Smith, and in the absence of a proper Civ.R. 54(B) certification, this appeal must be dismissed for want of a final appealable order.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . DONOVAN, P.J. and WELBAUM, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Bryan O. Steward William W. Johnston David C. Smith Dennis Haney Hon. Douglas M. Rastatter

1 A merit brief was filed by Percio and Joan Grieco. However, only Percio filed a notice of appeal.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2015

s0603

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2015

150702 & (54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150702

COA: 316316

Wayne CC: 13-000550-FH

LAWRENCE VIRGIL WAGNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

a new trial or to remand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1467 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1467

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prescribe regulations establishing minimum standards for space for 
       passengers on passenger aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2017

  Mr. Cohen (for himself and Mr. Kinzinger) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prescribe regulations establishing minimum standards for space for 
       passengers on passenger aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seat Egress in Air Travel Act of 
2017'' or the ``SEAT Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO SPACE FOR PASSENGERS ON AIRCRAFT.

    (a) Air Carrier Defined.--In this section, the term ``air carrier'' 
means an air carrier (as defined in section 40102 of title 49, United 
States Code) that transports passengers by aircraft as a common carrier 
for compensation.
    (b) Regulations Relating to Space for Passengers on Aircraft.--Not 
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator shall prescribe regulations--
            (1) establishing minimum standards for space for passengers 
        on passenger aircraft, including the size, width, and pitch of 
        seats, the amount of leg room, and the width of aisles on such 
        aircraft for the safety and health of passengers; and
            (2) requiring each air carrier to prominently display on 
        the website of the air carrier the amount of space available 
        for each passenger on passenger aircraft operated by the air 
        carrier, including the size, width, and pitch of seats, the 
        amount of leg room, and the width of aisles on such aircraft.
    (c) Consultations.--In prescribing the regulations required under 
subsection (b), the Administrator shall consult with the Occupational 
Safety and Health Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, passenger advocacy organizations, physicians, and ergonomic 
engineers.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert.

1. *Verdicts—When*Conclusive.—A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive.

Replevin.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 22, 1896.

L. H. Bisbbe & W. H. Gemmill, attorneys for appellant.

Ho appearance for appellees.

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of replevin, the contest being as to the right to the possession of a stock of groceries, etc.

*302Only a question of fact was presented. The dispute was as to whether George W. Bennett had delivered possession of the goods to Messrs. Saddler *&*Orr, to whom he had made a sale; the contest was not, as appellant argues, whether he retained a lien upon goods with the possession of which he had parted. As to whether appellee had given possession of the goods the evidence was contradictory, and the verdict of the jury justifiable.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.