alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME ON PAGES TWO AND THREE OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,420,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,434,043
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,704,168)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,989,947
<PP&E>                                      22,131,589
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,724,370)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,887,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,364,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,971
<OTHER-SE>                                  75,382,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,887,767
<SALES>                                      2,543,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,562,081
<CGS>                                          768,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,786,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             260,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,233,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                   829,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,404,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,404,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
#### Patricia McELHANEY, Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & CO., etc., Appellee.

No. 83-2710.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 1984.

Decided July 17, 1984.

Rehearing en banc Denied Aug. 23, 1984.

Rick Johnson, Johnson, Eklund & Davis, Gregory, S.D., Jana Miner, Rapid City, S.D., for appellant.

Woods, Fuller, Shultz & Smith, William G. Taylor, Sioux Falls, S.D., Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Lane D. Bauer, Andrew See, Kansas City, Mo., for appellee Eli Lilly & Co.

Before ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD *, Senior District Judge.

*

 The Hon. Edward Dumbauld, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for strict liability in tort, plaintiff Patricia McElhaney claims to have sustained injuries as a result of her mother’s taking the prescription drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) during her pregnancy in 1949. The defendant Eli Lilly & Company' conceded that it manufactured the particular DES taken by the plaintiff’s mother.

Prior to trial, plaintiff indicated to the District Court that she would offer no proof that Eli Lilly knew or should have known of the dangerous condition of the drug. Defendant likewise conceded that no warnings, were given indicating potential dangers of the drug. Based on these concessions and comments j and k of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, the District Court granted the defendant’s motion for directed verdict.1

On appeal, McElhaney argues that the District Court erred in holding that the courts of South Dakota would apply comments k and j of § 402A. On questions of state law, we normally defer to the judgment of the District Court. Hence the District Court’s interpretation of South Dakota law was reasonable. *McElhaney v. Eli Lilly & Co.,*575 F.Supp. 228, 230 (D.S.D.1983).

The South Dakota Supreme Court has adopted strict liability as expressed in § 402A. *Engberg v. Ford Motor Co.,*87 S.D. 196, 205, 205 N.W.2d 104, 109 (S.D. 1973). Further, comment k has been applied in a previous South Dakota case involving a prescription drug. *Yarrow v.**341*Sterling Drug, Inc.,*263 F.Supp. 159 (D.S. D.1967), *affirmed,*408 F.2d 978 (8th Cir. 1969).

Affirmed.

1

. Under comment j, a seller is required to provide warnings of potential dangers created by a product which is unavoidably unsafe, "if he has knowledge, or by the application of reasonably developed human skill and foresight should have knowledge, of the presence of ... the danger."
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Naval Academy Celebrates 175 Years in 2020

U.S. Naval Academy Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,659,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,869,166
<PP&E>                                      26,800,273
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,272,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,614,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,029,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,614,858
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               662,478
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  404,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   285,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1439 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to revise its sponsorship 

identification rules so as to require the disclosure of the names of 

significant donors to persons paying for or furnishing broadcast matter 

or origination cablecasting matter that is political matter or matter 

involving the discussion of a controversial issue of public importance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. 

WELCH, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COHEN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. SARBANES, Mrs. DAVIS of California, 

Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. KILMER, Mr. MCNERNEY, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. RASKIN, 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. POCAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. KEATING, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. EVANS, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to revise 

its sponsorship identification rules so as to require the 

disclosure of the names of significant donors to persons 

paying for or furnishing broadcast matter or origination 

cablecasting matter that is political matter or matter 

involving the discussion of a controversial issue of public 

importance. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1439 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Cam5 paigns Honest Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVISION TO SPONSORSHIP IDENTIFICATION 

7 RULES. 

8 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commis10 sion shall revise its sponsorship identification rules (sec11 tions 73.1212 and 76.1615 of title 47, Code of Federal 

12 Regulations) so as to provide that, in the case of broadcast 

13 matter or origination cablecasting matter that is political 

14 matter or matter involving the discussion of a controver15 sial issue of public importance, the announcement required 

16 by such sections shall include the names of significant do17 nors to the person the identity of which is required to be 

18 disclosed in such announcement. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Military Donates COVID-19 Vaccine Cold Storage Units to the Armed Forces of the Philippines 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### Guardianship of Reffke: Reffke, Appellant, vs. Reffke and others, Respondents.

*February 5*

March *6, 1934.*

*355For the appellant Theodore Reffke there was a brief by *Sigman & Sigman*of Appleton, and oral argument by *Samuel Sigman.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Catlin & Catlin*of Appleton, and oral argument by *Mark Catlin*and *Mark Catlin, Jr.*

Fairchild, J.

It appears from the record that Reffke, who was upwards of seventy-eight years of age, is a man of low mentality and all his life his affairs have been managed by members of his family; that he has an acute and unusual interest in sex relations. In summarizing the evidence in relation to this departure from the normal the court said:

> “His first wife conducted all of the affairs during her lifetime and I do not believe that he is able to control his properties and his securities. . . . He is not insane or bordering on insanity unless his sexual delusions prompted by his senility might be considered as something approaching senile dementia.”

We do not consider it necessary to review with any detail the evidence submitted upon the trial below, and consider it sufficient to say that while evidence was offered on the part of casual acquaintances and old friends favorable to the appellant, they were unfamiliar with the abnormal tendencies which were manifested to others who testified concerning them, and which show the existence of peculiarities indicating a lack of capacity on appellant’s part ó*f handling and disposing of his property, and an absence of .appreciation of the significance and results of his methods in relation to his property.

*356We hold that the decision below is sustained by evidence showing that by reason of old age, low mentality, and because of abnormal tendencies in particulars leading him into unwarranted extravagances and which make him an easy prey to designing persons, he is mentally incapable of having the charge and management of his property. Secs. 319.16 and 319.17, Stats.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1453 

To reaffirm the commitment of the Department of Homeland Security to 

countering all forms of extremism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. SOTO, Mr. 

TAKANO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. GRIJALVA, and 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the commitment of the Department of Homeland 

Security to countering all forms of extremism, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reaffirming DHS 

5 Commitment to Countering All Forms of Extremism’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1453 IH

1 SEC. 2. COUNTERING EXTREMISM. 

2 (a) PROHIBITION ON NAME CHANGE.—The Sec3 retary of Homeland Security may not change the name 

4 of the Countering Violent Extremism Task Force of the 

5 Department of Homeland Security. 

6 (b) GRANTS TO COUNTER EXTREMISM.—Notwith7 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of 

8 Homeland Security— 

9 (1) may not make grants to counter Islamist 

10 extremism in an aggregate amount of more than 

11 $4,000,000 in any fiscal year; and 

12 (2) shall ensure that any grants made by the 

13 Secretary to counter Islamist extremism pursuant to 

14 paragraph (1) for a fiscal year are closely matched 

15 in aggregate dollar amounts in grants made by the 

16 Secretary to counter other forms of extremism for 

17 such fiscal year. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### DEN EX DEM. WILLIAM HOLLOWELL *vs.*GEORGE KORNEGAY.

A. by will in 1786, devised to his son R. a tract of land and then proceeded as follows: “ And my desire is, if my son R die without heir lawfully begotten of bis body, for it to be sold, and equally divided between his own sisters.” *Held,*that the limitation over was too remote, and that estates tail having by the Act of 1784 been converted into fee simple estate, the son R. took an absolute estate in fee simple in the land devised.

The case of *Saunders*v. *Hyatt,*1 Hawks 247, cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Wayne County, at the Spring Term, 1847, his Honor Judge PeaesoN, presiding.

The premises were devised by Richard Martin in 1786, as follows : “ I give to my son Richard my dwelling plantation ; only my wife to live on one half of the land, during her widowhood and no longer. And my desire is, if my son Richard die without heir lawfully begotten of his body, for it to be sold, and equally divided between his-own sisters.” The wife died, and then Richard died in 1843, without having had issue. The defendant claims under conveyances in fee made by Richard, the son, in 1798. The testator left several daughters, and they all died before their father Richard, except Sarah Flowers, who is the lessor of the plaintiff in one count of the declaration. The testator appointed two executors, who died before 1843, and after the death of Richard, administration with the will annexed was taken out, and the administrator sold and conveyed the premises in fee to William Hollowell, who is the lessor of the plaintiff in the other count of the declaration. Upon these facts, which were agreed between the parties, the Superior Court was of opinion, that the title was in the *defendant,*and from a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

*J. H. Bryan,*for the plaintiff.

*Badger,*and *Mordecai,.*for the defendant..

*262'Ruffin, 0. J.

The judgment must be affirmed. There is nothing in the will to tie up the period for the limitation over to take effect, to lives in being- and 21 years after, so as to make this an executory devise. “ His own sisters” only means “his sisters,” and cannot be understood as intending a benefit to the sisters *'personally,*but only as vesting the interest in them. The case of *Saunders*v. *Hyatt,*1 Hawks 247, is directly in point. The wills are almost literally the same. The only difference is, that the devise by Saunders was to his son, “ and if he die without any heir lawfully begotten of his body, the testator orders the land to be sold and the proceeds divided among his sisters.” But that difference is entirely immaterial, as in each case the disposition over is after the .death of the first taker “ without heir lawfully begotten of his body,” that is, of a remainder after an estate tail in possession ; which the act of ’84 makes void. The fee vested in Richard, and is now in the defendant. The decision of this point renders it unnecessary to consider the others, in respect to the power of the executors to sell under this will, ánd that of the administrator under the act of 1836.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
China
VantagePoint Acquisition Company

     

    465
Brickell Avenue, #617

    Miami,
Florida 33131

     

    _________________, 2011

    


    Ray Shi
Capital Group, LLC

    [Address]

    [Address]

     

    Gentlemen:

     

    This letter will confirm our agreement
that commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) relating to the initial public offering
of the securities of China VantagePoint Acquisition Company (the “Company”) and
continuing until the consummation by the Company of a business combination or
the distribution of the trust account to the Company’s then public shareholders
(as described in the Registration Statement), Ray Shi Capital Group, LLC (the
“Firm”) shall make available to the Company certain general and administrative
services, including the use of office space, utilities and secretarial support,
as may be required by the Company from time to time, at [__________________] (or
any successor location).  In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay
the Firm at the rate of $7,500 per month.

     

    
      
        	 
      	
                Very
      truly yours,

              
	 	 
	 
      	
                CHINA
      VANTAGEPOINT ACQUISITION COMPANY

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                By:

              	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                Name:
      Wei Li

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Title:
      Chief Executive Officer

              


      

    

    


    
      	
              Agreed
      to and Accepted by:

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
              RAY
      SHI CAPITAL GROUP, LLC

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              By: 

            	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with  Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Wireless Age
Communications,  Inc. (the  "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Gary Hokkanen,  Chief Financial
Officer of the  Registrant,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to his
knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



Date:  April 28, 2006                   By:  /s/ Gary Hokkanen
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Name:  Gary Hokkanen
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer