alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Emkjer, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Accelrys, Inc. (the “Company”) and I, Rick E. Russo, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company for the period covered by this Report.
|        |   | /s/ Mark J. Emkjer                    |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Mark J. Emkjer                        |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                  |
|   |   |                                  |
|   |   | /s/Rick E. Russo                      |   |
|   |   | Rick E. Russo                         |
|   |   | Senior Vice President                 |
|   |   | and Chief Financial Officer           |
|   |   |                                  |
|   |   | Date: August 2, 2007             |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which itrelates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, whether made before or after the date of the Report and irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
#### Joseph Quinones, Appellant, v Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 538]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated June 7, 1993, which denied his motion, in effect, for reargument.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable paper. By a decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 15, 1994, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, upon the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal; it is

Ordered that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(see, Robinson v Laurent,*205 AD2d 517). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Open Text Corporation (the Company) for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Shackleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ JOHN SHACKLETONJohn Shackleton President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 9, 2006
#### Northern Reduction Company, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Tax Commission and others, Respondents.

*February 7*

March *5, 1929.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Quarles, Spence & Quarles*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *J. V. Quarles*of Milwaukee and *Maurice Weigle*of Chicago, of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. J. V. Quarles*and *Mr. Weigle.*

For the respondents there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Franklin E. Bump,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Bump.*

The following opinion was filed March 5, 1929:

Crownhart, J.

This case was argued and submitted with *Plankinton Packing Co. v. Wisconsin Tax Commission,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 368, 224 N. W. 121), and is ruled in all respects by the opinion in that case.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied on April 30, 1929.
EXHIBIT
32.2
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of FUSA Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jenifer Osterwalder, in my capacity as Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Jenifer
      OsterwalderDate:  
      September 3, 2008
              Jenifer
      Osterwalder
                Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 9, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00672

- CV

FAMSA, INC

. , Appellant

v.

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 45th Ju dicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 06465 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to fil e a brief is GRANTED . We order A ppellee’s brief due February 26, 2018.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of February, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Olin Oulber,rron, Commlrdone~ 

Eailroad CorgPiorion Of TOXa8 

Au&in, 'petal 

,ut uhloh 

prior to 

bn for 

u&t 

in a total of &Q,295.60 anbwhen mram was 

prerontell an& apprwed by the Conmie8ion for 

payment they worm returned by the Oomptrol~~r 

with the rtatumnt tTheoo aoeaunt8 lnour prior 

to grant of Limitation Board and not payable 

out or grant.* 
fIonorabls Olin Culberson, page 2 

“In view of the fact that these items were 

rpsolfloally Inoluded In our request, I wauld 

like for you to answer the fallowIng questiont 

“Can the Comptroller legally authorize 

warrants for ‘payment of there aooounte rendared to the Oommi~,sIon under date or Au&u& 

6th. but whioh warm inourred prior to the 

applioation ror limitation grant?n 

The grant made by the Limitation of Payment8 Board 

upon the petition Of the Railroad Commission, datrd July 1, 

19W, was to permit 8aId. Railroad Commission to srpenb men108 

naoeraary to adequately perform the runotfon8 OS 8alil 8tatm bopartment rrom available funds thoretotore appropriated ami 

then on hanb. 

The approval of the applioation ot the Railroad 

Coxmi8sion to L%~O suoh available fund8 for the doaIgnato6 purpose wan not an appropriation by ruoh body but 8uoh aotion on 

the part of auoh boriy wa8 rather a permirri~e gan$ to the Railroad Commission allowing it to use the rpeoIii6d mottle8 f;; thr 

purpose an6 in the amount8 set out in the applloation. 

Ueny payment8 of obllgationm inourrad prior to the date of the 

grant made by the Limitation OS Paymanta Boar4 would ronbar the 

Railroad CommIsaion powerle88 to oarry out it8 statutory iunotionq, and the very purpose oontemplated by the Legl8lature. 

In creating the Limitation of Payment8 Bo,ard would, in raot, 

be dereatsd. 
Honorable Olin Oulberaon, pago 3 

You are aooordlngly advleed that it la the opinion 

of thirr department that the Comptroller oan legally authorlea 

-anti payment of aooount8~renderod to the Railroad Coniml$- 

aion under date of August 6, 1941, but whloh aooounta were 

inourred prior to the applloation for limltatlon grant. 

Tour8 very truly 

ATTOEUFEY GENERAI, OF TEMB
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jorge Luis Hernandez

- Palomares

,

Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 312

- CR

Appeal from the

265 th District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 14

- 32887

- R )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief

until June 27

, 201 6

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Kristin R. Brown , the Appellant ’s Attor ney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 27 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 st day of June , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 751 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-440, K2025-437.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27908 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit
31.1




Exhibit
31.1—CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Christian Itin, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micromet, Inc.;
and




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date:
July 20, 2010




/s/    Christian
      ItinChristian
      Itin
                President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
No. 82-1101.

#### Sentinel Financial Instruments et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Gyora G. Cohen et al., Respondents, v Jess J. Cohen et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[631 NYS2d 514]

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered August 3, 1993, which, after a non-jury trial, awarded damages in favor of plaintiff Gyora George Cohen, individually, and against defendant Jess J. Cohen, individually, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court did not err in entering judgment in favor of plaintiff Gyora George Cohen individually, as its decision was grounded in the eighth cause of action of the complaint, breach of contract, and not on a derivative cause of action. Specifically, the individual plaintiff was awarded damages for breach of the parties’ subscription agreement. This duty owed by defendant to plaintiff individually arose independently of any duty owed by defendant to the corporation, and was therefore a proper basis for an individual cause of action. The IAS Court’s credibility determinations are entitled to great deference on appeal and its conclusion that an agreement existed between plaintiff Gyora George Cohen and his brother, defendant Jess J. Cohen, which was breached by defendant, is amply supported by the record. Moreover, in our view, the result below achieved justice between the parties.

We are unpersuaded that the other contentions raised on appeal warrant reversal. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
No. 82-5668.

#### Slotnick *v.*O’Lone, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael V. Shustek, as the Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,the sole Manager of Vestin Fund II, LLC, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Vestin Fund II, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Fund II, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Vestin Fund II, LLC’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Fund II,LLC and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinFund II, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos 33-82377 and34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund II, LLC’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund II, LLC’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Fund II, LLC’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Vestin FundII, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
5. Vestin Fund II, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Fund II, LLC’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Fund II, LLC’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Fund II,LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Fund II,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 13, 2004
/s/ Michael V. ShustekMichael V. Shustek
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1410 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1410

 To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

  Ms. McSally (for herself and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nogales Wastewater Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, OPERATIONS, AND 
              MAINTENANCE.

    (a) Definition.--In this section:
            (1) Agreement.--The term ``Agreement'' means the memorandum 
        of agreement between the United States Section of the 
        International Boundary and Water Commission and the City of 
        Nogales, Arizona, dated January 20, 2006.
            (2) City.--The term ``City'' means the City of Nogales, 
        Arizona.
            (3) Nogales sanitation project.--The term ``Nogales 
        sanitation project'' means the project owned by the City and 
        the United States Section of the International Boundary and 
        Water Commission and includes--
                    (A) the International Outfall Interceptor (IOI) and 
                the trunkline; and
                    (B) the Nogales International Wastewater Treatment 
                Plant (NIWTP).
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, pursuant 
to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 277d-10 et seq.), and 
notwithstanding the Agreement, an equitable proportion of the costs of 
operation and maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be 
contributed by the City should be based on the average daily volume of 
wastewater originating from the City.
    (c) Capital Costs Excluded.--Pursuant to the Agreement and the Act 
of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 277d-10 et seq.), the City shall have no 
obligation to contribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading 
the Nogales sanitation project.
    (d) Overcharges.--Notwithstanding the Agreement, the United States 
Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission shall not 
charge the City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 
and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion of the 
costs, as described in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Brian E. Rodiguez, President, Treasurer and Director of G/O Business Solutions, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 11, 2009  /s/ Brian E. Rodiguez Brian E. Rodiguez President, Treasurer and Director   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to G/O Business Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by G/O Business Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), John P. McLaughlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Corgentech Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:

The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
"Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 24th day of March 2005.

| |  | By: |  | /s/JOHN P. MCLAUGHLINJohn P. McLaughlin
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Corgentech Inc. and will be retained by Corgentech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Corgentech Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
No. 90-6024.

#### Vaughan *v.*Rock Church, Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 91-6278.

#### Man Chiu Li *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Gives 100,260 Covid-19 Pfizer Vaccines to Nepal, Adding to 1.5M Johnson & Johnson Doses Donated

U.S. EMBASSY KATHMANDU

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More