alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1206 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the cost of applying 

to an institution of higher learning as part of the benefits provided 

under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2017 

Mr. MESSER (for himself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. WALKER, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Miss 

RICE of New York, Mr. RUSH, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. HECK, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. KATKO, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

PERLMUTTER, Mr. WITTMAN, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. ISSA, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. FASO, and Mr. FRANKS of Arizona) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the cost 

of applying to an institution of higher learning as part 

of the benefits provided under the Post-9/11 Educational 

Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1206 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Barriers for 

3 Veterans Education Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COSTS OF APPLYING TO INSTITUTION OF HIGHER 

5 LEARNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3315A 

8 the following new section: 

9 ‘‘§ 3315B. Costs of applying to institution of higher 

10 learning 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—An individual entitled to edu12 cational assistance under this chapter shall also be entitled 

13 to educational assistance for the application fee required 

14 to apply to an approved program of education at an insti15 tution of higher learning. 

16 ‘‘(b) AMOUNT.—The total amount of educational as17 sistance payable under this chapter to an individual for 

18 applications described in subsection (a) is the lesser of— 

19 ‘‘(1) the total application fees charged to the in20 dividual by the institutions of higher learning; or 

21 ‘‘(2) $750. 

22 ‘‘(c) CHARGE AGAINST ENTITLEMENT.—The number 

23 of months (and any fraction thereof) of entitlement 

24 charged an individual under this chapter for an applica25 tion described in subsection (a) shall be determined at the 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1206 IH

1 rate of one month for each amount that equals the amount 

2 determined under section 3315A(c)(2) of this title.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

5 after the item relating to section 3315A the following new 

6 item: 

‘‘3315B. Costs of applying to institution of higher learning.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30630

Conference Calendar

 

ALCY JOSEPH, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ST. CHARLES PARISH GUIDE;

UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1306-F

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Alcy Joseph, Jr., #20731, appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his in forma pauperis complaint. We have reviewed

the record and Joseph’s brief and find no abuse of discretion. 

Because Joseph’s appeal lacks an arguable basis in law, it is

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th
No. 96-30630

- 2 -

Cir. R. 42.2. 

 This court previously cautioned Joseph that he risked the

imposition of sanctions if he continued to file meritless

complaints and cautioned him to review any pending appeals to

avoid the imposition of sanctions. See Joseph v. Lewis, No.

95-30846 (Oct. 18, 1995). Accordingly, Joseph is BARRED from

filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this court.

Further he is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis,

civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of

all federal district courts subject to the jurisdiction of this

court are directed to return to Joseph, unfiled, any attempted

submission inconsistent with this bar. 

 APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          49,462
<SECURITIES>                                   122,911
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                       263
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,763
<PP&E>                                          24,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       208,430
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,872
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                      36
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,749
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Document

Exhibit 10.5

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE 
[AMENDED AND RESTATED] CHANGE IN CONTROL
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
BY AND BETWEEN 
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND 
[___________]


    THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the [Amended and Restated] Change in Control Severance Agreement dated as of [________] by and between Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and [________] (the “Executive”) (the “Agreement”), is effective as of August 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).  Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 
    Section 7(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(c)  Subject to the foregoing, the Executive shall have the status of a general unsecured creditor of the Company and shall have no right to, or security interest in, any assets or property of the Company (or any Subsidiary) or any trust established by the Company to fund the payment of benefits hereunder (the “Trust”), and all funds contained in the Trust shall remain subject to the claims of the Company’s general creditors.  In furtherance of the foregoing, in the event of a Potential Change in Control or a Change in Control (as such terms are defined in the Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. Rabbi Trust Agreement by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (or its successor trustee) effective as of August 1, 2020 (or any successor trust agreement to the foregoing agreement) (the “Trust Agreement”)) or upon any other event specified in the Trust Agreement, the Company shall contribute (or cause to be contributed) to the Trust established thereunder assets in the amounts, and in accordance with the terms and conditions, as set forth in the Trust Agreement, provided that any such contribution would not result in a transfer of property within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code as contemplated by Sections 409A(b)(2) or (3) of the Code.”


This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one executed Amendment, and this Amendment may be signed via PDF, DocuSign or by any other electronic means and will have the same effect as original signatures.








[Signatures on the following page]


















        
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date set forth above. 


LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS, INC.






By:    


Name:   Michele R. Kuhrt


Title:     Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer










EXECUTIVE




    
[Executive]




    -2-
No. 82-729.

#### Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. *v.*Time, Inc.

Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. §1350

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Millennium Pharmaceuticals,Inc.

 

 
| Dated: May 6, 2003 |   | /s/ MARK J. LEVIN                       |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Mark J. Levin                           |
|               |   | Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer |
|               |   | (Principal executive officer)           |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Henry GOLDING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84-1608.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1984.

*184Craig A. Washington, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Helen M. Eversberg, U.S. Atty., Sidney Powell, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RUBIN, TATE, GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

, On June 18, 1984, the district court set bond at $1,000,000 cash or corporate surety for Robert Henry Golding who is awaiting trial on four counts of narcotics law violations, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, 841(a)(1), 846, 848, 952, 963 and one count of making a false statement in an application for a United States passport in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1542. The record before us contains a Notice of Appeal filed later than ten days, but less than forty days after the entry of the order appealed from. The notice of appeal in a criminal case must be “filed in the district court within 10 days after the entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” Fed.R.App.P. 4(b);' *see Wood v. U.S.,*391 F.2d 981, 983 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1968); *see generally*3A C. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 772 at 160 (2d ed. West 1982). However, Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) allows the district court to grant an additional thirty days with or without motion and notice. The filing of an untimely notice of appeal within the additional thirty-day period is customarily treated by this Court in criminal, cases “as a motion for a determination as to whether excusable neglect entitled a defendant to an extension of time to appeal.” *U.S. v. Awalt,*728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir.1984). Golding’s notice was filed within the additional period for excusable neglect.

We are compelled to raise *sua sponte*the issue of timeliness for a timely notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction on appeal. *Nelson v. Foti,*707 F.2d 170 (5th Cir.1983). The ten day period prescribed by Rule 4(B) for noticing an appeal in a criminal case may be extended by the district court upon a finding of excusable negiect. *See United States v. Scott,*672 F.2d 454 (5th Cir.1982). We presume neither the presence nor absence of excusable neglect but defer to the district court for this determination.

Remanded for a determination whether the Notice of Appeal should be deemed timely under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b).

REMANDED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 8, 2021

No. 04-21-00234-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.J.Z., CHILDREN,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01562

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Notification of Late Clerk's Record is hereby NOTED. The clerk's record is deemed 

filed.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AS PAGES TWO AND THREE
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,868,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,351,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,848,884
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,043,815
<PP&E>                                      26,749,704
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,098,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,582,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,658,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,291
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,085,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,582,683
<SALES>                                     19,337,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,806,656
<CGS>                                        5,711,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,597,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,729,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,627,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (955,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,672,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,672,083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# D-2 THAAD Battery: First Gunnery Certification on Foreign Soil

By 2nd Lt. Kelsey Burns 35th Air Defense Artillery Brigade

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CERTFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SEXTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OKLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elwood
H. Spedden., President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the
           end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations
           of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

Dated: February 14, 2003

/s/ ELWOOD H. SPEDDEN
---------------------------------
Elwood H. Spedden
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CERTFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SEXTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OKLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard L. Dissly, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
         of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the
         Company for the period covered by the Report.

Dated: February 14, 2003

/s/ RICHARD L. DISSLY
---------------------------------
Richard L. Dissly
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28026]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

B-59-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 35, Notification of Proposed Production 
Activity; PCI Pharma Services; (Pharmaceutical Products); Croydon and 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    PCI Pharma Services (PCI) submitted a notification of proposed 
production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facilities in 
Croydon, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania within Subzone 
35L. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's 
regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on November 21, 2024.
    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be 
limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and 
specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification 
(summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The 
benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ 
procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's 
website--accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    The proposed finished products include: tulisokibart dosages packed 
in assembled device in single or multi-dose packaging and sotatercept 
dosages packed in assembled device in single or multi-dose packaging 
(duty-free).
    The proposed foreign-status materials/components include: auto-
injector sub assembly for sotatercept; auto-injector sub assembly for 
tulisokibart; tulisokibart in pre-filled syringes; and sotatercept in 
pre-filled syringes (duty-free). The request indicates that certain 
materials/components are subject to duties under section 301 of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (section 301), depending on the country of origin. 
The applicable section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be 
admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
[email protected]. The closing period for their receipt is January 8, 2025.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information System'' section of the Board's 
website.
    For further information, contact Kolade Osho at 
[email protected].

    Dated: November 22, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-28026 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
Uvalde County Appraisal

District, Albert Mireles, Chief

s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00533

- CV

Kenneth W. ARTHUR , et al,

Appellant

v.

UVALDE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial Dist rict Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 04

- 28619

- TX

Honorable Watt Murrah, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason K. Pulliam , Justic e

The panel has considered the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED

.

_______________________________ __ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court