alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1445 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1445

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the circumstances 
      under which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall provide 
            reimbursement for emergency ambulance services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2017

  Mr. Coffman (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Ms. DeLauro, and Mr. Takano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the circumstances 
      under which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall provide 
            reimbursement for emergency ambulance services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Reimbursement for Emergency 
Ambulance Services Act'' or the ``VREASA''.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMERGENCY 
              AMBULANCE SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1725(c) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) In delineating the circumstances under which reimbursement 
may be made under this section for ambulance services for an 
individual, the Secretary shall treat such services as emergency 
services for which reimbursement may be made under this section if the 
Secretary determines that--
            ``(A) the request for ambulance services was made as a 
        result of the sudden onset of a medical condition of such a 
        nature that a prudent layperson who possesses an average 
        knowledge of health and medicine--
                    ``(i) would have reasonably expected that a delay 
                in seeking immediate medical attention would have been 
                hazardous to the life or health of the individual; or
                    ``(ii) could reasonably expect the absence of 
                immediate medical attention to result in placing the 
                health of the individual in serious jeopardy, the 
                serious impairment of bodily functions, or the serious 
                dysfunction of any bodily organ or part; and
            ``(B) the individual is transported to the closest and most 
        appropriate medical facility capable of treating such emergency 
        medical condition.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to ambulance services provided on or after January 
1, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 22, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 481 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-483, K2025-480.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27946 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Mark B. Hoffman, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The annual report on Form 10-K to which this statement is an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Commerce One, Inc.

Date: March 18, 2004

/s/ Mark B.
Hoffman
Mark B. Hoffman

Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Charles Boynton, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The annual report on Form 10-K to which this statement is an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Commerce One, Inc.

Date: March 18, 2004

/s/ Charles
Boynton
Charles Boynton

Chief Financial Officer
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2015

No. 04-14-00256-CR

Jeffrey LEE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6806

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 24, 2014. Appellant’s appointed

counsel, Mr. Edward F. Shaughnessy, III, has been granted two extensions of time in which to 

file appellant’s brief, the latest until January 28, 2015. On January 29, 2015, Mr. Shaughnessy 

requested a third extension of time until February 27, 2015. The motion is GRANTED, and it is 

ORDERED that Mr. Shaughnessy file appellant’s brief no later than February 27, 2015. NO 

FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:07 PM

To: cchilds@jlfrench.com

Subject: Trip Report

Hi Corey, this is a courtesy e-mail letting you know that the trip report that we sent back for you to review will be classified 

as non-CBI and is considered to be an accurate account of your aluminum operations. Comments were due back to our 

office on August 26, 2010. Thanks

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
#### P. ROLLINS and others v. HUGH BISHOP.

*Aetion to Recover Real Estate--Eviction of Tenant*— Practise.

If, in an action for the recovery of real estate in which a third person claiming as landlord of the defendant has been made a party defendant, judgment is taken against the tenant defendant and he is evicted, he is-entitled to be restored to possession until the determination of the controversy between the plaintiff and the interpleading defendant.

Civil ActioN; to recover possession of Real Estate tried at Eall Term, 1875, of Buncombe Superior Court, before Henry, *J.*

The facts in this case are the same as in the preceding case.

*Mr. J. H.*Merrimon, for. plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Battle Mordecai*and *J. G. Martin $ Son,*for defendant.

Bynum, J.

*These four actions are instituted by the same plaintiffs for the same premises and under the same claim of title, as in the case of *P. Rollins et al*v. *Ham Rollins*and *R. M. Henry,*decided at the present term. The same questions are involved and the decision in that' case is referred to as the decision of the Court in these actions. If the defendants or either of them have been evicted on judgments obtained in these actions they are entitled to restitution of possession until the determination of the issue made in them all between the plaintiffs and R. M. Henry who has *269applied and has the right to be made defendant either with or in the place of the tenants.

Error.

Per- Curiam. *Venire ele novo.*

*

*Rollins*v. *Edward Sams; Rollins*v. *Bishop Johnson; Rollins*v. *James Bishop.*
No. 82-1062.

#### Armstrong *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO OF ATARI, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atari, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruno Bonnell,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                   By: /s/ Bruno Bonnell
                                       ----------------------------
                                   Name:  Bruno Bonnell
                                   Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 13, 2003

                                     Page 37
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:22:09

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Sequoyah 1 Docket (050- 00327)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR110 - No procedure / reference documents E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

424

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

212

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Training / IR101 - Training process problem O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

101 - Training process problem O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 101 - Training process problem O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 101 - Training process problem O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

424

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR180 - Scheduling and planning LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:22:09

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Sequoyah 1 Docket (050- 00327)

Work Planning & Practices / IR187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

635

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 17
#### In the Matter of E & M Associates et al., Appellants, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 747]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated August 28, 1992, which denied administrative review of an order of the District Rent Administrator dated February 28, 1991, finding, *inter alia,*a rent overcharge, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated March 21, 1994, as dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to the petitioners, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing to determine whether the petitioners actually received notice of the order of the District Rent Administrator dated February 28, 1991, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

On February 28, 1991, the District Rent Administrator issued an order finding, *inter alia,*that the petitioners willfully overcharged rent to the respondent tenant Thomas Cumella. The petitioners brought a petition for administrative review of the order of the District Rent Administrator which was denied as untimely because it was filed more than 35 days after the issuance of the order. The petitioners commenced the instant proceeding asserting that they were entitled to review of the order of the District Rent Administrator because they had not received notice of it until judgment was entered against them on February 4, 1992, for $42,112.50. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78, without a hearing, finding that the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal established that the order of the District Rent Administrator had been mailed to the petitioners, giving rise to the presumption of receipt *(cf., Nassau Ins. Co. v Murray,*46 NY2d 828).

*719The petitioners submitted sufficient evidence to establish an issue of fact as to whether they received notice of the order of the District Rent Administrator prior to February 1992 *(see, Vita v Heller,*97 AD2d 464). Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 without a hearing on that issue *(see, Stone v Goldberg,*215 AD2d 180; *Matter of Black Realty Co. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*201 AD2d 432; *Woodner Co. v Higgins,*179 AD2d 444). Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

Epsilon Lambda Electronics Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract Nos. F A9453-1 O-C-0029 ) 

N68335-07-C-0460 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60704 

Mr. Robert M. Knox 

President 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Lawrence S. Rabyne, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Arlington Heights, IL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On 6 September 2017, Mr. Knox, on behalf of appellant, executed a settlement 

agreement with the government disposing of the subject matter of this appeal by 

establishing a payment plan with the government. The settlement agreement required 

appellant to file a motion to dismiss with prejudice within 10 days of its execution. 

This, appellant did not do. The government requested that we dismiss the matter 

anyway, and appellant opposed that request. Consequently, we conducted a telephonic 

status conference with the parties today to discuss the matter. During that status 

conference, Mr. Knox represented that he wished to dismiss his appeal with prejudice to 

bring this matter to closure. We inquired with Mr. Knox to make sure that he 

understood the ramifications of this request and that he understood that he would not be 

able to bring a new appeal on the same subject matter if the request were granted. 

Mr. Knox stated that he understood and that he still desired the prejudicial dismissal. 

We also inquired of the government whether it would still consider itself bound by the 

settlement agreement in light of appellant's failure to file a timely request for dismissal. 

On behalf of the government, Mr. Rabyne stated that the government would remain 

bound by the agreement. Mr. Rabyne also stated that the government had no objection 

to the motion to dismiss. 
In light of the government's agreement to abide by the terms of the settlement 

agreement and Mr. Knox's unopposed request to dismiss this appeal with prejudice, 

this appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Dated: 7 November 2017 

J.)IB1BPROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60704, Appeal of Epsilon 

Lambda Electronics Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,791,743               3,791,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,932                 114,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,906,675               3,906,675
<PP&E>                                          60,473                  60,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,970,364               3,970,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,414                  46,414
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         39                      39
<COMMON>                                         7,250                   7,250
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,970,364               3,970,364
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,815                 378,823
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               490,629               1,256,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (338,814)               (877,518)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (338,814)               (887,518)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)                  (0.10)
        


</TABLE>
|ALPHANET SOLUTIONS, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This
Certification is to accompany the Quarterly Report of AlphaNet Solutions, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report).


I,
Richard G. Erickson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2) |  | Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ RICHARD G. ERICKSON
Richard G. EricksonPresident and Chief Executive Officer, AlphaNet Solutions, Inc.
August 13, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |