T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T h e p a r tie s c o n s e n te d to p r o c e e d b e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 ** U . S . C . § 6 36 (c ).

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on *** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AS ON E L L S WOR T H C OA P L AN D, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. LONG , Sg t . ; I DA HO ST ATE C OR R E C T I ON AL I NS T I T UT I ON , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35952 D. C. No . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 4 8 6 - BL W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

I da ho M i ke l H . W i l l i a m s , M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng * * S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r27, 2011 *** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: F A R R IS , B E E Z E R , an d L E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JAN 03 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSP age 2 of 3

Ja son C oapl and app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof sum m ary j ud gm entt o S gt . S andra L on g o n h i s E i gh th A m endm entdel i bera t e i nd i ff er ence c l a i m . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on ove rthi s m a tt e rpur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. T he fa ct s of thi s c as e a re kn ow n t o the part i es . W e nee d n otre peatthem here . Th e d i s tr i c tc o u r tp r o p e r l y g r a n t e d s u mm a ry j u d g me n tt o Sg t . Lo n g . To prov e a n E i gh th A m endm entdel i bera t e i nd i ff er ence cl ai m , a pri soner- pl ai nt i ff m us ts how tha tthe pr i s on of f i c i a l w a s s ubj e c t i ve l y a w a r e of the r i s k. Farm erv. B r e nnan , 51 1 U . S . 82 5, 82 8 (19 94 ). C oapl and p rovi ded n o evi dence, other than hi s unsup po rt ed al l egat i on s, t o sug gestthatS gt . L on g k new the i dent i ty of the m an w ho a l l e ge dl y a s s aul t e d C oapl a nd, a nd “ thi s c our tha s r e f us e d t o f i nd age nui ne i s s ue w he r e the onl y e vi de nc e pr e s e nt e d i s unc orr obor a t e d a nd s e l f - s e rvi ng t es t i m on y. ” V

i l l i ari m o v. A loh a Islan d A i r, Inc. , 28 1 F . 3d 10 54 , 10 61 (9th C i r. 2002) ( i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt e d) . W e a l s o not e tha tC ope l a nd ga ve c o n f lic tin g a c c o u n ts r e g a r d in g h is o w n k n o w le d g e o f th e id e n tity o f

th e a s s a ila n t, an d h e n ev er i d en t i fi ed th e assai l an ti n th e p l ead i n g s o r o th er fi l i n g s. C oapl and argues s tre nu ou sl y thatdi sc ov ery w as i nadequ at e, bu thi s proper r e c o u r s e w o u ld h a v e b e e n aR u le 5 6 ( f ) m o tio n . See F e d . R . C iv . P . 5 6 ( f ) . A d is tr ic t c o u r t m a y e n te rs u m m a ry ju d g m e n t, w h e r e it is o th e rw is e ap p r o p r ia te , if the non- m ovi ng pa r ty f

a i l s t o f i l e aR ul e 56( f

) appl i c a t i on. See Carpent erv.P age 3 of 3

Un i v e rs a l

S ta rSh i p p i n g, S. A. , 924 F . 2d 1539, 1547 ( 9th C i r . 1991) . F orthe r e a s ons s t a t e d above , the di s tr i c tc our tpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ry j udgm e nt , thus C oapl a nd’ s f

a i l ur e t o m ove f

oraR ul e 56( f

) c ont i nua nc e pr e ve nt s hi m f r om chal l engi ng the i nadequ ac y of e vi dence before the di stri ctcourt . E ven i f w e w er e t o tr e a thi s f

i na l m ot i on t o c om pe l di s c ove rya s aR ul e 56( f ) appl i c a t i on, he ha s not p r o v id e d s u f

f ic ie n t f a c ts to s h o w th a t th e a lle g e d tap e r e c o r d in g e x is ts . Se e B lough v. H ol lan d R eal t

y, Inc. , 57 4 F . 3d 10 84 , 10 91 n. 5 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e have re vi ew ed C oapl and’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, and d et erm i ne that th e y la c km e r it. AF F I R ME D.