alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE TO THE USE OF SUSANNAH JUSTIS *vs.*GEORGE LEDBETTER.

In tlie case of a proceeding against the putative father of a bastard child, an examination of the mother, which does not appear to have been taken on oath is radically defective, and, the procedings should be quashed.

The proceeding case, of the State v *Ledbetter,*referred to and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Burke County at Spring Term, 1844, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.

This was a proceeding to charge the defendant, as father of a bastard child of one Susannah Justis. The examination of the mother did not purport to have been on oath, nor *to*have been taken within three years after the birth of the child. The defendant was bound to the Comity Court; and he appeared and moved that the proceedings should be quashed. That was refused, and he appealed to the Superi- or Court, where the motion was allowed, and therefrom the Solicitor for the State appealed.

*246
      *Attorney General*for the State.

No counsel in this Court for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

In a previous case at this term, *State*v *Ledbetter,*ante p. 242, we have given our reasons for affirming a similar judgment, quashing proceedings in bastardy, where the examination did not appear to have been taken in due time. The present is still a stronger case; since it is unquestionable, that an examination, not appearing to have been taken on oath, is radically defective.

Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2009Page 1 of 110/17/2014 10:09:33

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: D.C. Cook 2 Docket (050- 00316)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated Z - Other / Unknown Z - Other / Unknown 

113

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

113

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content P - Procedure Writers P - Procedure Dev 

225

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR148 - Action not yet started or untimely O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

113

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Training / IR102 - Individual knowledge LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

113

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 189 - Recognition of adverse condition / questioning attitude LTA O - Control Room Ops 

O - Operations

225

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 8
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135423 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135423 

 COA: 271039 

Muskegon CC: 05-052215-FH 

ALVIN ANTONIO JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRAVCO MINING INC. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodney Lozinski, Principle Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.
| |    

RODNEY LOZINSKIRodney LozinskiPrincipal Executive and Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2009


















---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27886]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 753 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-442, K2025-439.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27886 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
From: Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Rochelle Bo yd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/09/2010 02:24 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Information Collection Request for the Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category Based on the FR notice (http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA - WATER/2007/March/Day12/w1073.pdf

) issued b y the Office of Ground water and Drinking Water, I determine that Method 3500 Cr- C or D would be acceptable alternative s to Method 218.6. Peter Westlin Measurement Policy

Group OAQPS, SPPD 919 - 541 - 1058

---- Forwarded b y Rochelle Bo yd/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/02/2010 03:40 PM ----- From: jeffrey .hummel@gm.com To: Rochelle Bo yd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/02/2010 02:26 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Information Collection Request for the Secondary Aluminum Production Source Category

Rochelle, My lab informed me that they use method 6010C for non - Hg metals because they do not put "dirty samples" such as baghouse dust int o their 6020 MS. They also use 3500CR - D instead of 218.6 for Cr+6. Are these methods acceptable? Also, what does "IDL" mean? Please advise, **Jeffrey S. Hummel, MS, CHMM Sr. Environmental Engineer** **(812) 279 -**  **7271**

**(812) 279 -**  **7367 (Fax) jeffrey.hummel@gm.com**  **General Motors LLC 105 GM Drive, Bedford, IN 47421**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,720
<SECURITIES>                                    64,029
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (386)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,722
<PP&E>                                          25,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,022
<SALES>                                         27,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,847
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby                           ( print page 94778)                        gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 21, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 479 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-478, K2025-475.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27944 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Figure 1. IMPROVE monitoring data for ammonium nitrate beta e xtinction (Mm

showing numerous days with visibility i IMPROVE monitor operates every third day, so data i s not available for all days. - 1) from 2001 to 2003, showing numerous days with visibility i mpairment in the range from 10 to 30 Mm- 1. Note that the IMPROVE monitor operates every third day, so data i s not available for all days. 1) from 2001 to 2003, 1. Note that the
Memorandum to File

Subject: Communications between EPA and Lhoist on BART FIP for Nelson Lime Plant in 

Yavapai County,, Arizona

From: Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division

To: File

Date: June 13, 2014

Participants: 

Lhoist: Edward Barry, Western Environmental Manager, Lhoist

 Herbert Verville, Environmental Manager, Lhoist

 Eric Hiser, Attorney

 Mark Johnson

 Grant McCullough

 Jason Graham

EPA: Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division 

 Eugene Chen, Engineer, Permits Office

 Thomas Webb, Project Lead, Planning Office

 Charlotte Withey, Attorney-Advisor, Office of Regional Counsel

 

Summary: Lhoist and EPA had multiple communications to clarify the operation of the facility, 

to understand the impact of startup and shutdown on facility emissions and to identify 

information that could be made public in light of the Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

claim made by Lhoist.

Materials: 4/28/14 email with four attachments (two CBI attachments removed)

 5/9/14 letter from Lhoist to EPA

 6/3/14 email with summary data
Phone calls: 4/10/14 phone call between Ed Barry, Lhoist, and Colleen McKaughan, EPA

 5/2/14 call to discuss materials in 4/28/14 email

 5/7/14 call between EPA and Lhoist to continue 5/2/14 discussion

 6/4/13 call between Ed Barry and Herbert Verville, Lhoist, and Colleen 

 McKaughan, EPA
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1545 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose certain patient information to State controlled substance 

monitoring programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1545 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Prescription Data 

3 Accountability Act 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS DISCLOSURE 

5 OF PATIENT INFORMATION TO STATE CON6 TROLLED SUBSTANCE MONITORING PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 Section 5701(l) of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Under’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘a veteran or the dependent of 

12 a veteran’’ and inserting ‘‘a covered individual’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, a ‘covered individual’ is an 

16 individual who is dispensed medication prescribed by an 

17 employee of the Department or by a non-Department pro18 vider authorized to prescribe such medication by the De19 partment.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1545 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify 

for other purposes. controlled substance monitoring programs, and to disclose certain patient information to State the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Complex Mine Warfare Training Complete in RIMPAC Southern California

By MC2 Curtis SpencerU.S. 3rd Fleet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








Teton
      Energy Corporation


Denver,
      Colorado






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
      Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-129014) of Teton Energy Corporation of our report
      dated March 6, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements for the
      years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, which appears in this Form
      10-K.










/s/
      Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC


Ehrhardt
      Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC


Denver,
      Colorado


March
      8,
      2006
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Shant
S. Hovnanian, certify that:1.
  I have
  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Speedus Corp.;2.
  Based on my
  knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
  Based on my
  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
  for, the periods presented in this report;4.
  The
  registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)
  Designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
  Evaluated
  the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
  this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
  Disclosed in
  this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
  (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
  has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
  The
  registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
  registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
  All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and(b)
  Any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting.  Date:
  August 15,
  2005By:
  /s/ Shant S.
  HovnanianName:
  Shant S.
  HovnanianTitle:
  Chairman of
  the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer 18
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo-Yung Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. 

Date: April 25, 2017 

 

 
1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),Richard P. Powers, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Corgentech Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:**

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32.2 (the “***Periodic Report***”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 30th day of March 2006. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Corgentech Inc. and will be retained by Corgentech Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of Corgentech Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.