alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                                                 January 1, 2003

Mr. Ian Strachan
30 Bloomfield Terrace
London SW1W 8PQ
England

      Re:   Non-Executive Chairman

Dear Ian:

      On behalf of Instinet Group Incorporated ("Instinet"), we are pleased that
you accepted the role of Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Set forth below
are the agreed upon terms and conditions relating to this position:
<TABLE>

<S>                                       <C>

TERM:                                     Commences January 1, 2003 and expires upon Spring 2005 annual
                                          shareholders meeting, absent earlier resignation, removal, death
                                          or disqualification


AMOUNT OF TIME ANTICIPATED TO BE          Seven days per month (including two travel days).
DEVOTED TO ROLE:

RETAINER (INCLUSIVE OF ALL MEETING        $275,000 per annum, payable monthly.
FEES):

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD:                   $75,000 value annually to be awarded as of the date of the annual
                                          shareholders meeting in 2003 and 2004, with one-year vesting; pro-rata
                                          award based upon $75,000 annualized value from January 1, 2005 through
                                          the date of the annual shareholders meeting in Spring 2005, with
                                          one-year vesting

ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN:              Non eligible.

INSTINET 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN:          Non eligible.


EXPENSES:                                 Instinet shall reimburse you for all reasonable travel, lodging,
                                          meal and other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the
                                          performance of your duties and responsibilities as Non-Executive
                                          Chairman

</TABLE>



<PAGE>
Ian Strachan
Non-Executive Chairman
- Page 2 -


      We are indeed pleased that you will assume responsibilities of this
position and we look forward to working closely with you to help Instinet
succeed.

      Best regards.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   /s/ Paul A. Merolla

                                                   Paul A. Merolla
                                                   Executive Vice President,
                                                   General Counsel and Secretary



Accepted and Agreed
this 1st day of January, 2003

/s/ Ian Strachan
----------------------------------
Ian Strachan
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00271

- CR

Luz Albert Hernandez

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- 05

- 29349

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 26, 2018
<PAGE>   1
                 ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 EXHIBIT 12 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                         --------------------------------
                                                               1999            1998
                                                             -------         -------

<S>                                                          <C>             <C>
Consolidated pretax income from continuing operations        $  (564)        $  (845)
Interest expense                                               3,790           2,741
Interest portion of rent expense                                 135             136
                                                             -------         -------

     EARNINGS                                                $ 3,361         $ 2,032
                                                             =======         =======


Interest expense                                             $ 3,790         $ 2,741
Interest capitalized                                              16             209
Interest portion of rent expense                                 135             136
                                                             -------         -------

     FIXED CHARGES                                           $ 3,941         $ 3,086
                                                             =======         =======


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                               0.9             0.7
                                                             =======         =======
</TABLE>



For purposes of calculating the unaudited ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of income (loss) before provision for income taxes plus fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest charges and amortization of debt
issuance costs, whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental
expense that is representative of interest. In the three months ended September
30, 1999, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charge requirements by $580.
In the three months ended September 30, 1998, earnings were inadequate to cover
fixed charge requirements by $1,054.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Worldwide Entertainment & Sports Corp. 
</LEGEND>
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,041
<SECURITIES>                                   518
<RECEIVABLES>                                  292
<ALLOWANCES>                                   32
<INVENTORY>                                    327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,519
<PP&E>                                         49
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          73
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,632
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (41)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.18)
        




</TABLE>
No. 86-5723.

#### Moore *v.*Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1499. KEVIN EATON v. RONALD WELBORN, A/K/A ROBERT 

WELBORN, A/K/A RONALD BENNETT WELBORN, JR.

In this civil action, the plaintiff Kevin Eaton directly appeals the trial court’s

order denying his motion for a new trial, following a judgment in his favor in the

amount of $4,000.00. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less

must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35

(a) (6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998). Eaton’s

failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this

appeal. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and

this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 10, 2018

05/10/2018
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Japan Air Self-Defense Force Conducts Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Training at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni

By Cpl. Aaron HensonMarine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.














In connection with the ANNUAL Report of AMERICHIP INTERNATIONAL, INC..(the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Marc Walther, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 28, 2006





/s/
      Marc Walther


Marc
      Walther,


Chief
      Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7121

KEVIN L. CHOICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT BROGTON, Kershaw Correctional

Institution, South Carolina Department of

Corrections; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-00-1620-0-18BD)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin L. Choice appeals the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint and order denying his motion to reconsider. The court

dismissed Choice’s complaint based on his failure to exhaust his

state and administrative remedies. Because Choice may proceed with

this action by first exhausting his remedies and thereafter

amending his complaint to provide the exhaustion information requested by the court, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject

to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S., South Korea Repatriate Remains of 147 Korean Soldiers

By Terri Moon CronkDOD NEWS

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In re William Noah KNIGHT, Sr., a/k/a W.N. Wright, a/k/a Bill Knight a/k/a Noah Knight, Debtor. Charles A. GOWER, as Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Noah KNIGHT, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-8779.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 8, 1987.

Charles C. Carter, Columbus, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

Michael P. Cielinski, Columbus, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, William Noah Knight, appeals the entry of a default judgment against him in this bankruptcy case. We affirm.

Knight filed a petition in bankruptcy. On January 16, 1986, the Trustee filed a *1516complaint to deny Knight’s discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727. Knight did not file an answer within thirty days, and on March 4, 1986, the Trustee filed an application for entry of default under bankruptcy rule 7055. The same day, Knight filed his answer to the complaint. The next day, the bankruptcy court entered a default judgment against Knight. About nine days later, after a hearing, the bankruptcy court granted Knight’s motion to set aside the default and allow the answer. The Trustee appealed to the district court which reversed the bankruptcy court.

On appeal, we review the district court’s decision to reverse the setting aside of the default judgment. *Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp.,*722 F.2d 677 (11th Cir.1984); *Moldwood Corp. v. Stutts,*410 F.2d 351 (5th Cir.1969). Where a party offers no good reason for the late filing of its answer, entry of default judgment against that party is appropriate. *McGrady v. D'Andrea Electric, Inc.,*434 F.2d 1000, 1001 (5th Cir.1970). Likewise, the setting aside of a default judgment where no good reason has been offered for the default constitutes an abuse of discretion. In explaining the default, Knight’s lawyer, stated: “The reason for default is basically my own responsibility and I will say that I very foolishly relied on the elements of professional courtesy in this case.... ” Knight’s lawyer also characterized his failure to file a timely answer as an “oversight.” At no time did the lawyer attempt to show excusable neglect. Despite the lawyer’s reference to his “foolish reliance on the elements of professional courtesy,” he has not alleged any misconduct by the adverse party which led to the late filing. We agree with the district court that the interests of justice will be better served by enforcing the rule of procedure than by allowing this case to proceed on the merits.

AFFIRMED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1424 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 

National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Ms. MOORE, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. 

KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and 

New England National Scenic Trails as units of the 

National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Scenic Trails 

5 Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

7 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1424 IH

1 inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System’’ before 

2 the period at the end. 

3 SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third 

6 and fourth sentences and inserting ‘‘The trail shall be ad7 ministered by the Secretary of the Interior as a unit of 

8 the National Park System.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

10 Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act 

11 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence 

12 by inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System,’’ 

13 after ‘‘administer the trail’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00247-CV

MARGARET STONE, Appellant

V.

JEFFREY C. STONE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCV-190152

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order disqualifying counsel. Generally, 

appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 

S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if 

permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 

(Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) 
2

(orig. proceeding). This appeal is not from a final judgment or an appealable

interlocutory order. 

On April 19, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a 

response within ten days showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal. 

Appellant filed no response. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
Docket No: FAA- 2014 - 1047 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 157 -AD

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  7/29/14 **Regional Airline Association**  7/29/14 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  7/29/14 **Airlines for America Robert Ireland**  7/29/14
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Japan Kick Off Exercise Keen Sword

U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
##### 



Exhibit 10.41 December 22, 2004
    
    (Photon Dymanics Logo)
 Dr. Malcolm Thompson
c/o Photon Dynamics, Inc.
5970 Optical Court
San Jose, CA 95138 Dear Malcolm: As you are aware, Photon Dynamics, Inc. (the Company) and you are party to a consulting agreement
dated March 18, 2004 (the Agreement) pursuant to which you provide Consulting Services (as
defined in the Agreement) to the Company in the position of Executive Chairman of the Companys
board of directors. The Company is pleased to offer to extend the Consulting Period (as defined in
Section 1 of the Agreement) from December 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005. If you are in agreement to the extension of the Consulting Period to March 31, 2005, please sign
and return to me the original of this Agreement and retain a copy for your files. Other than the
extension of the Consulting Period, all provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged by this
letter. We look forward to continuing to work with you pursuant to the Agreement. Sincerely,Photon Dynamics, Inc.By:
    /s/ Richard OkumotoRichard OkumotoChief Financial OfficerAccepted and Agreed:/s/ Malcolm ThompsonMalcolm Thompson