alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tli c lionorabi e Rn y L.iIJoo d Secretar y orTr:iiisporlatio n U.S . Ocparimcn t

orTr<ins|iorta(iu n nOONc^ v Jerse y Ave . S h Washington , D C 2059 0 111'. I Auyust24 . 2(H 0 

### .^cPARTMENTO F ^:^^^.HSP0RTAT10 N 

## .:C.KE TOPERATION

S mOC T- ! A O 2 3

Deal " Secretary LaHood . I d mwriiin g l o yo u toda y i n support oTth e Kugeu c Airport' s applicatio n fa r aSmal l Cnmmunil y Air

Servic e Developmen t

progra mgran t

t o establis ha

n air servic e lin

k l o Sa n Jose , California . Curren t

dati i sugges t

San Jos e a s bein g th e mos t underused , nonsto p ai r

ser v ic e marke t t o pursue . 1 a

mtol dth e Sa

n Jos e destinatio n marfce

i i s th e twelft

hto p destinatio n o f passengcr e usin g th e Eugen e Airport (EUG) . However . EUGi s onl y abl e t o retai n 15 % o f local passenger s withmor e tiia n S0 % drivin g t o Portland . Fundin g th e EU Gproposa l may provid e a n opportunity t

o recaptur e marke t

shar e l o Sa

n Jos e whil e filling a

n identifie dtransportatio n nee di n th e comntunity . Ne w tionsto p route s hav e als o bee n show n l o stimulat e passenge r irarfi c o n th e ne w route i n additio n l o buildin u busines s relationship s bciwea i ih c tw o communities . Pleas e giv e th e Eugen e Airport' s applicatio n fo r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

progra mgran t

you r fai r am i ful l consideration . I

f yo u hav e further

question s pleas e cal l Juin e Chad ain my Eugen e offic e a t 541-431'022") . Sincerely , Ro n Wyde n Unite dState s Senato r
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

JUAN E. RIVERA III,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 528 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert B. Barnhill, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended December 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

#  

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

#  

#  

| Date: February 13, 2008 |   | /s/ Robert B.  Barnhill, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.      |
|                         |   |                              |

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##  

##
No. 86-5934.

#### Adams *v.*Hamilton, Superintendent, Harnett Youth Center, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 91-6229.

No. 91-6261.

#### Smith *v.*United States; and Jenkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 936 P. 2d 1243.
Fac ID Facility Name Street City County State Zip

74 APACHE STAINLESS EQUIPMENT CORP. 200 W. INDUSTRIAL DR. BEAVER DAMDODGE WI 53916

4702 Astra Plating 1535 W. Pierce St. Milwaukee WI 53204

96 ASTRO INDS. INC. 810 PARKVIEW GREEN BAY RD. BROWN WI 54304

182 CHILTON PLATING CO. INC. 420 E. MAIN ST. CHILTON CALUMET WI 53014

196 CHROMETECH OF WISCONSIN 10020 S. 54TH ST. FRANKLINMILWAUKEEWI 53132

380 Griep, Inc., Tri-City Plating 2237 LIBERTY AVENUE/ HW BELOIT Y 81WI 53511

426 HYDRO-PLATERS INC. 3525 W. KIEHNAU AVE. MILWAUKEEMILWAUKEEWI 53209

438 INDIANHEAD PLATING INC. 1610 PALMER ST. CHIPPEWA FALLS CHIPPEWAWI 54729

473 JAGEMANN PLATING COMPANY 1324 S. 26THMANITOWOCMANITOWOCWI 54220

537 Master Lock Co. 2600 N 32NDMILWAUKEE WI 53210

5044 Metalplate & Products Inc. 2900 West Vliet Street Milwaukee WI 53208

584 MILWAUKEE PLATING CO. 1434 N. 4TH ST. MILWAUKEEMILWAUKEEWI 53212

5072 National Plating Co. 1565 West Bruce Street Milwaukee WI 53204 1290

5090 Oshkosh Plating Services, Inc. 1228 W. South Park Ave. Oshkosh WI 54901

665 PHILLIPS PLATING CORP. 984 N. LAKE AVE. PHILLIPS PRICE WI 54555

5113 Plating Engineering Co. 1928 S. 62nd St. Milwaukee Milwaukee WI 53234 1187

735 RACINE PLATING 620 STANNARD ST. RACINE RACINE WI 53403

792 SCOT INDS. 810 E. NEBRASKA ST. MUSCODAGRANT WI 53573

809 SK WILLIAMS CO. 4600 N. 124TH ST. WAUWATOSA MILWAUKEEWI 53225

817 SOUTHWEST METAL FINISHING - Dakota East 2795 S. 166TH ST. NEW BERLINWAUKESHAWI 53151

5200 Standard Plating Co., Inc. 5734 West Florist Ave. Milwaukee WI 53218

911 U.S. CHROME CORP. OF WISCONSIN650 OAK PARK AVE. FOND DU LAC FOND DU LAC WI 54935

913 ULTRA PLATING 345 S. PEARL ST. GREEN BAYBROWN WI 54306

969 WISCONSIN PLATING WORKS INC. 931 CARROLL ST. PLANT 1 RACINE RACINE WI 53403
Hard DecorativeAnodizing

X

X X

X

X

X

53204 1290

X

53234 1187

X X

X X

X

X X

X
#### Vanmeter and Others v. Fulkimore.

Monday, June 15, 1807.

Judgment by Default — Entry—Appearance Bail.-* -If an oi'iice judgment be set aside and the suit defended by the appearance bail, and he afterwards waives his plea, judgment is to be entered against the defendant as well as the ball.

*

See Wallace v. Baker, 2 Munf. 334; Lee v. Carter, 3 Munf. 121; monographic *note*on "Judgments” appended to Smith v. Charlton, *7*Gratt. 425.

This was an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Hardy rendered in an action of debt upon a bond.

An office judgment was obtained against the defendants, and their appearance bail, at the rules held in the Clerk’s office, in October, 1805. At the May term, 1806, the entry on the record is, “on the motion of the defendants, by their attorney, the office judgment is set aside: and thereupon, Lhe appearance bail pleaded payment, upon which issue was joined.” At a subsequent term the appearance bail waived his former plea, and judgment was entered against the ■defendants and the appearance bail, for the debt, &c.

It was stated to have been the uniform practice of the old General Court, where the appearance bail defended *the suit, as in this case, to suspend the conditional judgment against the principal, till a final judgment was obtained against the appearance bai¡.

JUDGE TUCKER

observed that, if there had been a confession of judgment by the appearance bail, it might well be doubted whether it would not have been error to enter a judgment against the principals; on the authority of the case of Fisher and others v. Riddell, (1) decided in April, 1805. But the bail, having waived his former plea, left the defendants undefended; and therefore the court was warranted in entering up judgment against them.

By the whole Court, judgment affirmed.

(1)

 The ease of Fisher and others v. Riddell* was this. After a conditional judgment, the defendants appeared by attorney, and set it aside, and confessed a judgment. The plaintiff then proceeded to a judgment against the appearance bail. This judgment was reversed by the Court of Appeals; because the conditional judgment having been set aside, and the defendants having appeared by their attorney and confessed the plaintiffs a-ction. the appearance bail was thereby discharged, and no judgment ought to have been rendered against him. —Note in Original Edition.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1473 

To prohibit the deployment of members of the Armed Forces to Syria for 

purposes of engaging in ground combat operations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. POCAN, 

Mr. PALLONE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. BASS, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. RASKIN, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the deployment of members of the Armed Forces 

to Syria for purposes of engaging in ground combat 

operations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibit Expansion 

5 of U.S. Combat Troops into Syria Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1473 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES GROUND COM2 BAT PRESENCE IN SYRIA. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

4 (b), no funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 

5 made available for the Department of Defense may be ob6 ligated or expended for the purpose of— 

7 (1) deploying members of the United States 

8 Armed Forces on to the ground of Syria for the pur9 poses of engaging in ground combat operations; 

10 (2) awarding a contract to a private security 

11 contractor to conduct any activity on the ground of 

12 Syria; or 

13 (3) otherwise establishing or maintaining any 

14 presence of members of the United States Armed 

15 Forces or private security contractors on the ground 

16 of Syria, unless the purpose of such presence is lim17 ited solely to rescuing or protecting members of the 

18 United States Armed Forces from imminent danger. 

19 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition under subsection 

20 (a) does not apply to the deployment of United States 

21 Armed Forces to protect, rescue, or remove United States 

22 personnel. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

LETTER PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T



                         [ASCENT ENERGY INC LETTERHEAD]

April 29, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         By letter dated April 29, 2002, addressed to the Board of Directors of
Ascent Energy Inc., our independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP,
pursuant to the requirements of Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos.
33-8070 and 34-45590, represented that their audit of Ascent Energy Inc. was
subject to Arthur Andersen LLP's quality control systems for U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of
the audit.


                                Sincerely,

                                /s/ KEVIN D. McMILLAN
                                -------------------------
                                Kevin D. McMillan
                                Senior Vice President and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1411 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1411

  To continue in effect for the 2017 and 2018 fishing seasons certain 
 fishing specifications for the summer flounder fishery, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

  Mr. Pallone (for himself and Mr. LoBiondo) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To continue in effect for the 2017 and 2018 fishing seasons certain 
 fishing specifications for the summer flounder fishery, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparent Summer Flounder Quotas 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF FISHING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUMMER FLOUNDER 
              FISHERY.

    (a) Limitation.--The final rule published by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service titled ``Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; 
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fisheries; 2017-2018 Summer 
Flounder Specifications and Announcement of 2017 Summer Flounder and 
Black Sea Bass Commercial Accountability Measures'' and published 
December 22, 2016 (81 Fed. Reg. 93842), shall not apply with respect to 
the summer flounder fishery.
    (b) Continuation of Previous Specifications.--The specifications 
for summer flounder established in the rule titled ``Fisheries of the 
Northeastern United States; Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass 
Fisheries; 2016-2018 Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass 
Specifications'' and published December 28, 2015 (80 Fed. Reg. 80689), 
shall apply with respect to the summer flounder fishery until the date 
on which--
            (1) a new summer flounder stock assessment is completed 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) a new rule based on such stock assessment takes effect.
    (c) Relationship to Existing Law.--Subsections (a) and (b)--
            (1) shall apply notwithstanding section 302(h)(6) of the 
        Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 
        U.S.C. 1852(h)(6)); and
            (2) shall not be construed to affect any other provision of 
        such Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 86-76.

#### Branch Banking & Trust Co. et al. *v.*National Credit Union Administration Board et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	U.S., Philippine Air Forces to Conduct Cope Thunder, First Since 1990
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">U.S., Philippine Air Forces to Conduct Cope Thunder, First Since 1990</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published April 26, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii -- Cope Thunder - Philippines 23-1, a Pacific Air Forces-sponsored exercise, is scheduled to begin May 1 with primary flight operations over Clark Air Force Base, Philippines, and is scheduled to run through May 12. Cope Thunder Philippines is designed to provide bilateral fighter training with the Philippine Air Force and improve combined interoperability.<br />
<br />
Approximately 160 USAF service members are expected to fly, maintain and support more than 12 aircraft from the 35 Fighter Wing, Misawa Air Base, Japan units during this iteration of the exercise. Service members from the Armed Force of the Philippines will exchange tactics, techniques and procedures while improving interoperability.<br />
<br />
Cope Thunder began in the Philippines in 1976. It was moved to Eielson Air Force Base in 1992, and eventually renamed Red Flag Alaska. (For 23-1) This is the first iteration of Cope Thunder in the Philippines since 1990. It provides a unique opportunity to integrate forces and improve interoperability between the Philippines and the United States.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                    936,856
<SECURITIES>                                                            1,845,172
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           2,432,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                                60,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        5,801,079
<PP&E>                                                                    260,014
<DEPRECIATION>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          8,472,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   4,036,412
<BONDS>                                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                                    6,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              4,104,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            8,472,729
<SALES>                                                                 3,401,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        3,401,922
<CGS>                                                                   1,918,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           1,918,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        1,461,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            36,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        36,931
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                               36,931
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                 .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 .01



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne**, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment 1 of Photon Dynamics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /S/ Jeffrey A. Hawthorne     **Jeffrey A. Hawthorne**  **President and Chief Executive Officer**Date:November 21, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
--------------------------------------------

                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ---------------------
                                                  1996           1995
                                                 ------         ------

Net income....................................   $   52         $  563

Computation of weighted average
 common and common equivalent shares
 outstanding:
   Common stock...............................    6,955          5,664
   Options and warrants.......................      667            890
                                                 ------         ------
Total weighted average common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding.........    7,622          6,554
                                                 ------         ------
Net income per share..........................   $ 0.01         $ 0.09
                                                 ======         ======

                                      15