alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 93555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE483]

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management Councils 
(Councils) will hold a public meeting of their joint Northeast Trawl 
Advisory Panel (NTAP).

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, December 13, 2024, from 12 
p.m. to 1:30 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the calendar at www.mafmc.org prior to the meeting.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Councils' NTAP will meet to discuss the 
Operational Manual and Orientation Document. The intent of this meeting 
is to discuss NTAP in detail, including background, organization, 
purpose, and member expectation. This meeting will be an opportunity 
for new and existing NTAP members to discuss and learn about the goals 
and purposes of NTAP.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 21, 2024.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-27769 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
Exhibit
99.6




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Stantec
Inc. (the "Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission.
  I, Daniel
J. Lefaivre, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   Date:  February
      25, 2010
              /s/ Daniel J. LefaivreDANIEL
      J. LEFAIVRE, CMASenior
      Vice President & Chief Financial
Officer







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Stantec
Inc. (the "Company") is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission.
  I, Robert
J. Gomes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
                    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
                    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   Date:  February
      25, 2010
                    /s/ Robert J. GomesROBERT
      J. GOMES, P. ENGPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92696-92697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27434]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Vaccine Research 
Center Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAID.
    The meeting will be open to the public via Zoom, https://nih.zoomgov.com/j/1617772822?pwd=UaZ1sTjftGCftXjzaWVccw9rIifRg9.1. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance

[[Page 92697]]

with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual 
intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute Of 
Allergy And Infectious Diseases, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Vaccine Research Center Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIAID.
    Date: December 10, 2024.
    Closed: 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.

    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Address: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, Convent Drive, Room 1100, Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Open: 11:45 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

    Agenda: Concept review.
    Address: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, Convent Drive, Room 1100, Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Closed: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

    Agenda: To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Address: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, Convent Drive, Room 1100, Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sarah J. Austin, Vaccine Research Center, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 40 Convent Drive, Room 1100, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 761-7187, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 19, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-27434 Filed 11-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### Mary A. Bisconti et al., Respondents, v Louis Turitto, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[631 NYS2d 521]

In an action to *574recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Louis Turitto appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated May 24, 1994, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in answering. The appeal brings up for review so much of the order of the same court, dated August 17, 1994, as, upon renewal and reargument, substantially adhered to its original determination (CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 24, 1994, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated August 17, 1994, made upon renewal and reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 17, 1994, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The appellant has failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for his default in interposing an answer *(see, State Farm Ins. Co. v Sheeran,*204 AD2d 617). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




AmeriChip
      International, Inc.


Plymouth,
        MI
 
 **REPORT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  We
        have
        audited the accompanying balance sheets of AmeriChip International, Inc.
        as of
        November 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of operations,
        stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial
        statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
        responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
        on
        our audit.
 
 We
        conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
        Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
        we plan
        and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
        statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
        on a
        test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
        statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
        and
        significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
        financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
        reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In
        our
        opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
        material respects, the financial position of AmeriChip International, Inc.
        as of
        November 30, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations, stockholders’
deficit and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
        accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
        America.
 
 The
        accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
        will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial
        statements, the Company’s significant operating losses raise substantial doubt
        about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding
        the resolution of this issue are also discussed in Note 2. The financial
        statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
        of
        this uncertainty.
 
 
 
 Williams
        & Webster, P.S.
 *Certified
        Public Accountants*
 Spokane,
        Washington
 February
        26, 2007
Page 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30428 Summary Calendar

PLES BELL, ET AL Plaintiffs PLES BELL; WOODROW WILEY Plaintiffs-Appellants

versus TENSAS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD; ET AL Defendants TENSAS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Lousiana (USDC No. 3:75-CV-275)

______________________ __________________________________* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. Page 2 

### Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* 1 Ples Bell and Woodrow Wiley filed this school racial discrimination lawsuit in 1975. In March 2005, a related case originally filed in 1969, United States v. Tensas Parish , was dismissed with prejudice upon a finding that the school district had reached unitary status. After this dismissal, Bell and Wiley filed a motion for enforcement of judgment, injunctive relief, and contempt of court- all of which looked to the jurisdiction and oversight of the federal court in the 1969 suit. Their motion was denied as moot in light of the earlier order of dismissal in United States v. Tensas Parish . For the following reasons, we dismiss this appeal as moot and without jurisdiction. 1. A case may become moot if 1) there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur, and 2) interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects the alleged violation. County of Los Angeles v. Davis , 440 U.S. 625, 631, 99 S. Ct. 1379, 1383 (1979). The district court’s finding of unitary status in United States v. Tensas Parish also impinges on the facts at issue in Bell, at al v. Tensas Parish

. 2. Davis ’ first element is satisfied because the population of Tensas Parish, as well as the organization of the school district serving it and the conduct of the schoolPage 3

board, are far different from that which existed in the 1970's. For this reason, there is no reasonable expectation that segregation will be reimposed. Davis ’ second element is satisfied because, under the finding and judgment of the court, the 36- year duration of the integration order has spanned several generations of school children in the parish, eradicating the effects of past segregation to the extent practicable. 3. Insofar as the appeal seeks by filing this brief to contest or appeal the order of March 2005, it comes too late to confer jurisdiction on this court. DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Scipio M.
Carnecchia, President and Chief Executive Officer of Accelrys, Inc. (the Company) and I, Michael A. Piraino, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the period covered by this Report.



/s/ Scipio M. CarnecchiaScipio M. CarnecchiaPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Michael A. PirainoMichael A. PirainoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)Date: August 9, 2010


A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1389 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide States with flexibility 

to provide care coordination under Medicaid for the most vulnerable 

through managed care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

States with flexibility to provide care coordination under 

Medicaid for the most vulnerable through managed care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increasing State Flexi5 bility in Care Coordination for the Most Vulnerable Act 

6 of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1389 IH

1 SEC. 2. STATE FLEXIBILITY TO PROVIDE CARE COORDINA2 TION UNDER MEDICAID FOR THE MOST VUL3 NERABLE THROUGH MANAGED CARE. 

4 Section 1932(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1396u–2(a)(2)) is amended by striking subpara6 graphs (A) and (B). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 91-6210.

#### Clark *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Michael Clark, Appellant, v Gail Clark, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 467]

Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered August 17, 1994 in Clinton County, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s application for reinstatement of an income execution against plaintiffs retirement benefits.

The parties were divorced in August 1988. Equitable distribution of their marital property was ordered by Supreme Court in January 1990, except for the division of plaintiff’s pension, 46.88% of which was awarded to defendant by order of Supreme Court in April 1992. In September 1992, plaintiff filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 7 of the US Bankruptcy Code (11 USC) and, in July 1993, Bankruptcy Court issued plaintiff a discharge in bankruptcy.

The following year, defendant successfully moved in Supreme Court, *inter alia,*to enforce her right to receive her judicially decreed share of plaintiff’s pension benefits; Supreme Court directed plaintiff to pay defendant $2,706.75 in arrears, representing the amount defendant should have received as her share of those benefits, and reinstated defendant’s income execution against them.

Plaintiff maintains that Supreme Court had no jurisdiction *788to rule on the issue of his pension benefits because Bankruptcy Court had exclusive jurisdiction over these benefits from the moment plaintiff filed his bankruptcy petition. We are unpersuaded.

Pension benefits, earned during the course of a marriage and prior to the commencement of an action for divorce or the signing of a separation agreement, constitute marital property over which Supreme Court has jurisdiction when determining issues of equitable distribution *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c]; *see also, Majauskas v Majauskas,*61 NY2d 481, 485-486). That being so, Supreme Court had jurisdiction to issue its order of April 1992, distributing to defendant her interest in plaintiffs pension. With the entry of Supreme Court’s judgment of divorce and order equitably distributing the parties’ marital property, defendant’s interest in plaintiffs pension vested and became her exclusive property *(see, In re Potter v Potter,*159 Bankr 672, 675).

Plaintiffs subsequent petition in bankruptcy had no effect upon defendant’s interest in his pension fund, for by the time plaintiff filed his petition in September 1992 defendant’s interest therein had already become her sole and separate property *(see, Chandler v Chandler,*805 F2d 555, 557, *cert denied*481 US 1049) and, hence, could not be counted as one of plaintiffs debts, nor discharged by order of Bankruptcy Court *(see, In re Potter v Potter, supra).*

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
EX-4.5





 Exhibit 4.5 

FORM 51–102F3 
 MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

  

	Item 1	 Name and Address of Company: 



Absolute Software Corporation (“Absolute”) 
 1055 Dunsmuir Street,
Suite 1400 
 Vancouver, BC 
 V7X 1K8 

 

	Item 2	 Date of Material Change: 



October 20, 2020 
  

	Item 3	 News Release: 



Absolute issued a news release on October 20, 2020 that was disseminated via Business Wire and filed on SEDAR. 

 

	Item 4	 Summary of Material Change: 



Absolute announced the appointment of Steven Gatoff as Absolute’s new Chief Financial Officer, effective November 10, 2020. 

 

	Item 5	 Full Description of Material Change: 



 

	5.1	 Full Description of Material Change: 



Absolute announced that Steven Gatoff will join Absolute as Chief Financial Officer effective November 10, 2020. Reporting directly to Christy
Wyatt, Absolute’s President and CEO, Mr. Gatoff will have responsibility for all global finance, accounting, financial reporting, audit, tax, investor relations, and capital planning functions. 

 

	5.2	 Disclosure for Restructuring Transactions: 



Not applicable. 
  

	Item 6	 Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102:



 Not applicable. 
  

	Item 7	 Omitted Information: 



Not applicable. 
  

	Item 8	 Executive Officer: 



The name and business telephone number of an executive officer of Absolute who is knowledgeable about the material change and this material change report
is: 
 Maninder Malli 
 Vice President, Legal and Corporate Secretary 

604-730-9851 
  

	Item 9	 Date of Report: 



October 20, 2020
No. 90-5814.

#### Martinez *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00093-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 096-318102-20

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE N^3 OWNER, L.P. D/B/A N^3 L.P., WRIA 2017-3, L.P., WRIA

2017-2, L.P., WRIA 2017-7, L.P., AIRW 2016-6, L.P., WRIA 2016-7, L.P.,

WRIA 2017-5, L.P., WRIA 2017-6, L.P. AND WRIA 2017-4, L.P., Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 9, 2021
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Casino Journal
Publishing Group, Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby
certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2002

/s/ Glenn Fine Glenn Fine,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Casino Journal
Publishing Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2002

 /s/ Alan R. Woinski
Alan R. Woinski, President and Chief Financial
Officer