alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RICHARDSON NICHOLS et. al. *vs.*JOHN DUNN et. al.

When an executor returns an account of sales in which he sets forth, besides the property, the amount of sales whereof is stated, several lots of corn, cotton, &c., as being sold at the same time, with the prices pet-bushel or pound stated, but without giving the quantity of any one of them, or carrying out their amount in money, a commissioner, in ta-lcing an account of the estate, cannot reject these articles; but should call upon the executor, upon whom the burthen of proof is thrown in such case, for explanation in regard to them; and, if none be afforded should charge him with an amount making the assets at least equal to the disbursements.

On taking the account of the administration of the person*288al assets of William Keeling, deceased, by his executor, the defendant, 'Dunn,- as directed by the decretal order of this Court, the Commissioner reported that the said executor received assets but to the amount of $180:04 cents, while he paid debts of his testator, and made other disbursements on account of the estate of his testator, to the sum of $308:07, leaving a balance due to the said executor, and for which he was, in equity, a creditor, as against the real estate of the testator, in the qum of $128:03 cents. To this report the' defendants, the devisees of said real estate, excepted, and all their-exceptions substantially presented the same objection. It appeared, from the evidence accompanying, and referred to in the report, that the commissioner fixed the amount of assets at the said sum of $180:04 cents, from that amount being charged by the executor against himself, in an account of sales returned by him to the County Court. But the same account sets forth,1 besides the property, the amount of the., sales whereof was stated as aforesaid, several !t lots of corn, wheat, cotton and wool,” as being sold at the same time; stated the prices per bushel or pound at which these articles were severally sold; but gave not the quantity of any of them, nor carried out their amount in money. Upon this evidence, unexplained, the commissioner, being unable -to ascertain the value of those omitted articles, left them out of his account of the amount of assets — and to this the said defendants excepted.

*Badger*for the plaintiff.

*W. A. Graham*and *J W. Norwood*for the defendants.

Gastojv, Judge,

having stated the case as above, proceeded as follows: The Court is of opinion that the exceptions are to be allowed, and the report set aside. This evidence threw the burthen of explanation on the executor, and those who claim through him, the alleged creditor of *the*real estate. If no explanation were given, the commissioner ought to have inferred that the assets were at least equal to his disbursements. As the mistake of the Commissioner may have prevented explanations which otherwise might and would have been rendered, the Court, while it sets aside the report, *289re-commits the cause for making the inquiries heretofore ordered. '

Per Curiam. Order accordingly.
#### Kalb and wife, Appellants, vs. Feuerstein and wife, Respondents.

*March 15*—

May 7, *1940.*

*J. J. McManamy*of Madison, for the appellants.

*Moran & O’Brien*of Delavan, for the respondents.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The facts briefly stated are as follows : On March 7, 1933, in the county court of Walworth *508county the defendants Feuerstein began a foreclosure on the farm of Kalb, the plaintiff. On April 21, 1933, judgment of foreclosure was entered. On October 2, 1934, the plaintiff filed a petition under the Frazier-Lemke Act. On June 27, 1935, Kalb’s petition was dismissed in the federal court. On July 20, 1935, the sheriff sold the premises in foreclosure. On August 2, 1935, sheriff’s deed was delivered to the purchaser. On August 28, 1935, congress passed the second Frazier-Lemke Act. On September 6, 1935, plaintiff’s petition in the bankruptcy court was reinstated, and the June 27, 1935, order was vacated. On September 9, 1935, a certified copy of this order was filed with the clerk of the county court. On September 16, 1935, the sheriff’s sale was on due notice confirmed. On December 16, 1935, the county court on application of the Feuersteins issued a writ of assistance which was executed by George O’Brien as sheriff and under which the Feuersteins were put in possession of the premises.

This action was begun by the plaintiffs to recover possession of their premises on the ground that the confirmation of sale made September 16, 1935, and the writ of assistance which was issued December 16, 1935, were void and of no effect. That contention of the .plaintiffs has been upheld by the supreme court of the United States. Under the decision of this court in *Allen v. Elderkin*(1885), 62 Wis. 627, 22 N. W. 842, and *Gerhardt v. Ellis*(1908), 134 Wis. 191, 114 N. W. 495, it is held that the rights of the defendants in the foreclosure proceeding are those of a purchaser at a foreclosure sale before confirmation of the sale, and that the defendants were therefore not entitled to the possession of the premises until the sale was duly confirmed. As of the date when this action was begun it does not appear from the complaint that a valid confirmation has ever been had. It must be held therefore that the complaint states a cause of action and that the trial court was in error in sustaining the demurrer.

*509
      *By the Court.-*— The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the plaintiffs’ action is reversed in accordance with the mandate of the supreme court of the United States. Likewise the order of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer of the defendants to the complaint is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Naval Base Guam Paves the Way for Safe Haven Liberty Ports

By Valerie MaigueU.S. Naval Base Guam Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# PACAF Airmen take Rapid Airfield Damage Assessment System to New Heights

By Airman 1st Class Jordan Smith673 ABW

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 93388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27634]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20732 and #20733; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
20014]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida 
(FEMA-4828-DR), dated October 5, 2024.
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.

DATES: Issued on November 1, 2024.
    Incident Period: September 23, 2024 through October 7, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 4, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 7, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Florida, dated October 5, 2024, is hereby amended to update the 
incident period for this disaster as beginning September 23, 2024 and 
continuing through October 7, 2024.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-27634 Filed 11-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Order entered January 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01296-CV

TERRELL E. BITTEN, Appellant

V.

STATE FARM INSURANCE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08190

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 17, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file 

an amended brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to February 19, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
AFS-13-339-E

May 23, 2013

 Exemption No. 10777

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0377

Ms. Nicole Hill

Parent of Kyle Hill

Curkish, Bailieborough

County Cavan, Ireland

Dear Ms. Loucks:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received April 18, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Kyle Hill for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Kyle to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Kyle.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Kyle Hill exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). 

In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Kyle is 

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent

necessary to allow Kyle to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS 

during use of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Kyle’s parents or a 

caregiver accompanying him. Kyle Hill may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger 

seated behind him. In addition, Kyle’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2612

_____________________________

SEAN FLEMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

July 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Sean Flemon, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is correcting a notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 11, 2024. This document, noticing a closed meeting held on October 8, 2024, contained an incorrect report of the vote regarding the closing of the meeting.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Friday, October 11, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-23688, on page 82608 in the second column, correct the text “vote of Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis Hill, Director Jonathan McKernan, Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)” to read: “vote of Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis Hill, Director Jonathan McKernan, and Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)”.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary, at 202-898-8748.

Dated: November 18, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-27312 Filed 11-18-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 3 & 4 of the
company's Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               5,227
<SECURITIES>                                         8,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                      111,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (4335)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    92,199
<PP&E>                                              34,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (6,607)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     237,658 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,406 
<BONDS>                                             73,844 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                14
<OTHER-SE>                                         126,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       237,658
<SALES>                                             18,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18,554
<CGS>                                               10,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       15,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,217
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.14
        


</TABLE>
Information Collection Request NRG Vienna 

8

Acid Gas HAP Grou

p Method Test Length Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Report

HCl/HF 26A 180 8:55-11:55 13:08-16:18 16:39-19:39 lb/mHCN CTM-033 180 8:55-11:55 13:08-16:18 16:39-19:39 lb/mNOx 7E 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, pSO2 6C 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, pProcess Data Time 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35Process Data Date 2-24-10 2-24-10 2-24-10F-factorMercury and Metallic HAP GroupMercury 30B 120 8:43-10:43 16:25-18:25 21:30-23:30 lb/mMetals + Filterable PM 29 240 8:03-14:06 16:18-20:35 21:20-01:30 lb/mPM (Runs 2 and 3) 5 60 - 15:52-17:42 21:25-23:04 lb/mPM2.5 + Total PM (Run 1) OTM-027 214 7:00-12:30 - - lb/mCondensable PM OTM-028 214/60 7:00-12:30 15:52-17:42 21:25-23:04 lb/mProcess Data Time 7:00-14:06 15:52-20:35 21:20-01:30Process Data Date 2-23-10 2-23-10 2-23/24-10F-factorNon-Dioxin Organic HAP GroupVOST 0031 120 9:44-11:35 13:05-15:20 16:49-18:42 lb/mmBtu, ugMethane 18 120 9:44-11:44 13:05-15:05 16:39-18:39 lb/mmBtu, pPOM 0011 120 9:44-12:12 13:05-15:38 16:39-19:35 lb/mmBtu, ugFormaldehyde 0011 120 9:44-12:12 13:05-15:38 16:39-19:35 lb/mmBtu, pTHC 25A 120 9:50-11:50 13:06-15:06 16:39-18:39 lb/mmBtu, pCO 10 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, pSO2 6C 180 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35 lb/mmBtu, pProcess Data Time 9:00-12:00 13:15-16:15 16:35-19:35Process Data Date 2-24-10 2-24-10 2-24-10F-factorDioxin/Furan Organic HAP GroupDioxin/Furan/PCB 23 480 6:46-15:03 15:43-23:54 7:55-18:26 lb/mmBtu, ngProcess Data Time 6:46-15:03 15:43-23:54 7:55-18:26Process Data Date 2-23-10 2-23-10 2-24-10F-factor
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 26, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 26, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0444. LUCY BEDELLE NIX v. FRANK EUGENE SCARBROUGH.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SPDR201901152