alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
  Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Greg Wujek, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)     
the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)     The
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.
 
 PHYTOMEDICAL
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:November 6,
      2008
                  By:
                  /s/ Greg WujekGreg
      WujekPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         4687840
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         9400079
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   60747069
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        27350869
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          27426661
<LOANS>                                      404934675
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3436150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               518661385
<DEPOSITS>                                   428470621
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            9279879
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7665887
<OTHER-SE>                                    73244998
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               518661385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8412847
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1529766
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9942613
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5387132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5387132
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4555481
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    30000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (61325)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 343327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3012307
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3012307
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1991048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.02
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3406150
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3436150
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            839750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2596400
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KAREEM OLIVER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 4 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of May, 2022, the “Petition for Review (In the Nature of a 

Complaint in Mandamus)” and the “Application for Special Relief (In the Nature of 

Peremptory Judgment)” are DENIED.
**Exhibit31.4**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Marsha H. Fanucci,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 onForm 10-Q/A of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.
| Date: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ MARSHA H. FANUCCI                              |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Marsha H. Fanucci                                  |
|                        |   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Freezers EV 188NYWS from Whirlpool Home Appliances Page 1 of 2 

Filters & Aecesl!loriea Offers & Events Owner Center Search 

home, products> kitchen gallery> freezers, EV188NYWS 

'~zoom 

PROIlUCT fEATUl!ES 

Features 

ENERGY STAR® Qualified 

Flat Smooth Door 

Frost Free Defrost mQre 

Icemaker Capable 

Interior Light mme 

Up-Front Temperature Controls ffiQr(l 

Fast Freeze Setting mQre 

Adjustable Mid Basket 

Bottom Storage Basket 

4 Adjustable Glass Shelves 

Slida Out Shelves 

6 Adjustable Door Bins 

1 Lower Door Shalf - Gallon 

4 Rollers 

(::;:) J;miJil Pgge Print P<Jgf) 

EV188NYWS 

This Whirlpool® Sidekick® all-free~er provides a unique 

solution to your food storage needs, p",ir with the 

mE1tching Sidekick® all-refrigerator to have all of your 

groceries in one side-br-side configuration and a totE11 

combined 35.4 cu, ft, of storage! 

White-on-White 

Model: EV188N"'("NQ 

rl'lSRP: $1'249,00 

Stainless Steel 

Model: EV188NYWS 

M8RP: $144'3,00 

Dimensions 

Depth: 31 Inches ................ " ................ "... Width: 30 Inches 

Dimensions shown are for pl,mning 

purposes only. For complete 

information, see Installation 

Instructions packed with product. 

Electrical Requirements 

60 Hz. 120 V. 

MSRP is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price and may not necessarily be the price at which the product is sold in tile consumer's area. Dealer alone 

http://www.whirlpool.comlcatalog/product.j Sp ?src= FREEZERS&cat=506&prod= 1952 12/312010 
Freezers EV 188NYWS from Whirlpool Home Appliances Page 20f2 

determines actual price. 

I1HfRNAII(f)IM §U[5 SHE INDEX 

® Registered trademark/TM Trademark of Whirlpool, U.S.A. © 2010 Whirlpool Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 

All other trademarks are owned by their respective companies. Privacy statement I Terms of use 

http://www.whirlpool.com/catalog/product.j Sp ?src=FREEZERS&cat=506&prod= 1952 12/6/2010 
Freedom® Collection 24 inch Built-in Freezer Columns Model T24IF70NSP Page 1 of 1 

FIND A DEALER GET A QUOTE ABOUT CONTACT ENTER KEYWORD 

COOKING REFRIGERATION DISHWASHERS PlANNING TRADE CULINARY SUPPORT .. MY lFlfRMAOOR 

FREEDOM® COLLECTION 24 INCH BUILT-IN FREEZER 

COLUMNS MODEL T241F70NSP 

Home> Refrigeration> Freezer Columns> Freedom® Collection 24 inch Built-in Freezer Columns Model T24IF70NSP 

Ov~rv'~w Features Ac;cessories Spec:;:s/Dimensions 

Related Products 

Freedom® Hinge 

Electroni.; Control Board 

Insulated Door Compartment 

Large Capacity Freezer Drilwer 

Multiple Handle Options 

Newly-Engineered Ice-Maker 

Newly-Engineered Ice-Maker produces convenient sized cubes for all parties and 

occasions. 

View All Features 

ADD TO MY FAVORITES 

VieW this product in 

a designer kitchen 

SHARE PRINT 

View recipes for this 

product 

GET A QUOTE 

SITEMAP I PRESS ROOM I LEGAL/PRIVACY I DIGITAL. TOOLBOX I SAFETY NOTICES I 

Warranty Product Manuals 

Copyright 2010 Thermador Wg!) O~$l9fl by W~b A.dvcm~ed 

http://www.thermador.com!refrigeration/freezer-columns/t24if70nsp-freedom-collection-... 1112312010
### NO. 03-15-00271-CV

CYNTHIA WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY § IN THE THIRD DISTRICT AND ON BEHALF OF § THE ESTATE OF NORMAN WALKER; § STEPHEN WALKER; § STEPHANIE WALKER HATTON; § JORDAN WALKER; AND § CAREN ANN JOHNSON, § Appellant

, § § V. § COURT OF APPEALS § UME, INC. D/B/A CAMP HUACO § SPRINGS; WWGAF, INC. D/B/A § ROCKIN ‘R’ RIVER RIDES; § WILLIAM GEORGE RIVERS; AND § RICHARD DUANE RIVERS § Appellees

. § AUSTIN, TEXAS

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Comes now, Karen L. Landinger, and makes her entry of appearance as lead appellate

counsel for Appellee WWGAF, INC. D/B/A ROCKIN ‘R’ RIVER RIDES.

1. The necessary information for Karen L. Landinger is as follows:

Karen L. Landinger State Bar No. 00787873 Cokinos, Bosien & Young 10999 West IH-10, Suite 800 San Antonio, Texas 78230 (210) 293-8700 (Office) (210) 293-8743 (Direct) (210) 293-8733 (Fax) klandinger@cbylaw.com

2. Please forward all notices, orders, correspondence and communication to Ms.

Landinger at the above provided information.

KLL\SLD\G:\WPDOCS\4662001\W ALKER V

. WWGAF\P LEADINGS \APPEAL (3 RD COA)\WWGAF

- E NTRY OF A PPEARANCE

- K AREN L ANDINGER

. WPD P AGE 1 OF 3 ACCEPTED 03-15-00271-CV 5411721 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/26/2015 10:18:28 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

### Respectf ully submitt ed,

COKI NOS, BO SI EN & YOUNG

By 

# /s/ Karen

L. La ndin ger KAREN L . L ANDI

NGER State Ba r No. 00787873 ANDRES R. GONZ AL EZ State Ba r No. 24032240 10999 West I H-10, Suite 800 San Antonio, Texas 78230 (210) 293- 8700 (Off

ice) (210) 293- 8743 (Dire ct - L anding er) (210) 293- 8752 (Dire ct - Gonzalez) (210) 293- 8733 (F ax) klanding er@c by law.com
ag onzalez@cby law.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPEL L EE, WW GAF
, I NC. D/B/A ROCKI

N ‘R’ RI VER RI DES

K LL \SLD\G:\W

PDOCS\4662001\W

A L K E R V

. W W GA F\P L

E A D IN G S \A PPE A L (3 RD COA )\WW GA F

- E N T RY O F A P P E

A RA N CE

- K A RE N L A N D IN G E R

. W P D P A G E 2 O F 3

### CERTIFIC ATE OF SERVICE

I cer tify on May 26, 2015, I serve d a copy of the fore g oing Entry of Appearance on the parties listed below by elec tronic s er v i ce and that the elec tronic transmission was repor ted as complete. My

email addr ess is klanding er@c by law.com

.

C O U N S E L F O R 

### A P P E L L A N T S 

### Clark Richards RI CHARDS RODRI GUEZ & SKEI TH 816 Congr ess Avenue , Suite 1200 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 476- 0005 (F ax) (512) 476- 1513 (Off

ice) cric hards@r

rsfirm.com

C O U N S E L F O R 

### A P P E L L E E S 

### , UME, I

N C



### . D 

### / B 

### / A 

### C A M P 

### H U A C O 

### S P R I N G S 

### , W I L L I A M 

### G E O R G E 

### R I V E R S 

### , A N D 

### R I C H A R D 

### D U A N E 

### R I V E R S 

### Wil lie Be n Daw I I I DAW & RAY, L L P 5718 Westheimer Road, Suite 1750 Houston, Texas 77057 (713) 266- 3121 (Off

ice) (713) 266- 3188 (F ax) wbdaw@ dawr ay .com



# /s/ Kar en L. Lan dinger
KAREN L . L ANDI

NGER

K LL \SLD\G:\W

PDOCS\4662001\W

A L K E R V

. W W GA F\P L

E A D IN G S \A PPE A L (3 RD COA )\WW GA F

- E N T RY O F A P P E

A RA N CE

- K A RE N L A N D IN G E R

. W P D P A G E 3 O F 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2414

ADAM J. CIRALSKY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GEORGE J. TENET, individually and in his capacity as 

Director of Central Intelligence; LOUIS JOSEPH FREEH, in 

his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation; ROBERT MCNAMARA, JR., individually and in 

his capacity as the General Counsel Central Intelligence 

Agency; JOHN DOE, individually and in his capacity as the 

Chief, Counterintelligence Center, CIA; EDWARD CURRAN, 

individually and in his capacity as Chief, 

Counterintelligence Group, CIA; JOHN LEWIS, individually 

and in his capacity as Assistant Director of the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation; RICHARD CALDER, individually and 

in his capacity as Deputy Director for Administration, CIA; 

DAWN EILENBERGER, individually and in her capacity as the 

Principal Deputy General Counsel, CIA; KATHLEEN MCGINN, 

individually and in her capacity as Complaints Attorney, 

Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, CIA,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

INVESTIGATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00911-LMB-JFA)
2

Submitted: August 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & 

SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tony West, 

Assistant Attorney General, Neil H. MacBride, United States 

Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Douglas N. Letter, Dana Kaersvang, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Adam J. Ciralsky appeals the district court’s judgment

dismissing his complaint alleging various causes of action under 

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 

403 U.S. 388 (1971), for violations of his constitutional rights 

and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2006). All of Ciralsky’s 

claims arise from the revocation of his security clearance and 

his subsequent termination from federal employment. The 

district court dismissed Ciralsky’s complaint for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, based 

on qualified immunity, and as barred by the applicable statute 

of limitations. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we 

conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 728 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-410, K2025-408.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27226 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph
Wagner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of XA,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of XA,
Inc.





By:/s/ Joseph
Wagner


Joseph
Wagner


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





April  15,
2008
#### The Justices of Currituck v. Dennis Dozier *et al.*

A bond, made by a guardian and his sureties to A, B, and the rest of the justices, is not in pursuance of the act of 1762 ( *He»,*c. 69, s. 7 ) and c.an be supported only at common law. If one of the obligors be a justice at its execution, it is void as to all.

This was an action of debt upon a guardian bond. The bond was made payable to *ff Willis Qtheriige, Jo-'*' *288*sepjh Ferebee*and the other justices of Currituck county.” uP°n *°-icr*^a(^’ an(l *nnn*esi *factum*pleaded, it was proved that *Dozier,*one of the obligors, was at the execu--t[ori ()f tlie bond a justice of the peace. The action was brought in the name of those justices who were in office at its commencement.*

*Kinney*and *Bevereux,*for the plaintiffs.

*Hogg, contra.*

*

 The record in this case also was lost, and. the. reporter is therefore-unable to give a more particular statement of the facts.

Ruffin, Judge.

The principal question in this case has been already decided in *Justices of Cumberland,*v. *Armstrong et al.*at this term. The act of If62 (Rev. *c.*69. *s. 7 )*directs a guardian bond to be made payable to the “justices present in court, the survivor or survivors of them, their executors or administrators”. Under the statute therefore, the bond is nothing more than a common law bond, payable to inviduals and their personal representatives, in trust for another. This being the case, this bond must be taken to have been given to the individuals who were justices, by the description of their office. *Dozier,*^hen, was both obligor and obligee, and the bond is void. There has been an attempt to distinguish this case from that of the *Justices*v. *Armstrong,*by the circumstance that it is payable to “ *Willis Etheridge, Joseph Ferebee, and the other justices of Currituck county*This is said to exclude, by necessary implication, that justice who was obligor ; as if it had been expressed, *“*the rest *except Dozier.”*That depends upon what the word “ rest” refers to. It is introduced in that part of the bond, in which the obligees are set forth, and was designed to describe them *;*and it plainly refers to the obligees, *Etheridge*and *Ferebee,*who are expressly named, and was designed to include, and does include as obligees all that class of persons, of which those two form parts. This is the plain and obvious grammatical construction of the words ; and we cannot imply an intention of the parties, or insert an exception against those words. Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.†

†

 The case of *the Justices of Martin*v. *Stewart,*was in every respect' similar to the above, and the same opinion-was filgd in both.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1301 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                        February 9 (legislative day, February 8), 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1301) entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the Department of 
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and for other 
purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

    Sec. 101.  The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018 (division D of 
Public Law 115-56) is further amended by inserting after section 165 
the following new section:
    ``Sec. 166. (a) Employees furloughed as a result of any lapse in 
appropriations which begins on or about February 9, 2018, shall be 
compensated at their standard rate of compensation, for the period of 
such lapse in appropriations, as soon as practicable after such lapse 
in appropriations ends.
    ``(b) For purposes of this section, `employee' means:
            ``(1) a Federal employee;
            ``(2) an employee of the District of Columbia Courts;
            ``(3) an employee of the Public Defender Service for the 
        District of Columbia; or
            ``(4) a District of Columbia Government employee.
    ``(c) All obligations incurred in anticipation of the 
appropriations made and authority granted by this division for the 
purposes of maintaining the essential level of activity to protect life 
and property and bringing about orderly termination of Government 
functions, and for purposes as otherwise authorized by law, are hereby 
ratified and approved if otherwise in accord with the provisions of 
this division.''.
    Sec. 102.  For the purposes of division D of Public Law 115-56, the 
time covered by such division shall be considered to include the period 
which began on or about February 9, 2018, during which there occurred a 
lapse in appropriations.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Appropriations Amendments 
Act, 2018''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1301

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
#### In re REY CAFE COFFEE SERVICES, LTD. Edward J. CUNION, Appellant, v. Robert N. SINGER, Rey Cafe Coffee Company, Inc., Luther Stewart and Raymond Flores, Appellees.

Bankruptcy No. 82-00689MA.

CIV 82-1315 HB.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico.

Dec. 6, 1982.

ORDER

This matter comes on upon the motion to dismiss the appeal of the movant Edward J. *744Cunion. It appears that no leave has been granted to file the appeal from an interlocutory order of the Bankruptcy Court, 24 B.R. 680 (Bkrtcy.), denying movant Cun-ion’s motion to dismiss the involuntary petition in bankruptcy against him; Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the appeal of Edward J. Cunion is dismissed.