alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC

EXHIBITS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Cingular Wireless LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stanley T. Sigman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, tO the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       By: /s/  Stanley T. Sigman
                                           ----------------------
                                           Stanley T. Sigman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: February 24, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2017

a0620 

# Order

Clerk June 23, 2017

154444

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154444

COA: 331947

Oakland CC: 2002

- 187234

- FC

TRACY LYNN COWAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 3, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Oakland County Pr osecuting

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this

order. In particular, we direct the prosecutor to address whether the defendant has

adequately raised and demonstrated good cause under MCR 6.508(D) bas ed on a

showing that the performance of her appellate counsel on direct appeal was ineffective,

People v Reed , 449 Mich 375, 382 (1995), and whether the defendant was actually

prejudiced as a result.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Indian, Japanese and U.S. Maritime Forces to Participate in Exercise Malabar 2018

Commander, Task Force 70 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10473

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Daniel Murillo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-362-11

Before Clement, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Daniel Murillo appeals the 210-month prison term and the three-year 

term of supervised release imposed on his guilty plea conviction for 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, 

namely, a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10473 Document: 00515816687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2021
No. 20-10473

2

methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 846; see also 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 

(b)(1)(C). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The district court declined to reduce Murillo’s adjusted offense level 

by two levels under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(18) because the court determined 

that Murillo possessed firearms in connection with the crime of conviction

and thus could not meet that subsection’s requirement that he satisfy all the 

criteria of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a). As the Government shows, applying the 

reduction under § 2D1.1(b)(18) does not change the 240-month guidelines 

sentencing range calculated by the district court because the requested 

reduction produces that same range. Both with and without the reduction, 

the applicable guidelines range is above the statutory maximum sentence of 

20 years and therefore the guidelines range is 240 months. See U.S.S.G. 

§ 5G1.1(a); 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), 846. Consequently, 

because it does not affect the guidelines sentencing range, the alleged error 

causes no harm. See United States v. Chon, 713 F.3d 812, 822 n.7 (5th Cir. 

2013). Because the Government has carried its burden of establishing that 

the district court’s decision not to apply the § 2D1.1(b)(18) offense level 

reduction was harmless, we need not consider the propriety of that decision. 

See United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 765 (5th Cir. 2005); see also

Chon, 713 F.3d at 822 n.7; United States v. Rodriguez, 523 F.3d 519, 525 (5th 

Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10473 Document: 00515816687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Explosive Ordnance Disposal Teams Vie for Best in the 

By Sgt. 1st Class John Brown 8th Theater Sustainment Command  

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7699

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAY LEE CASON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:03-cr-00005-LHT; 1:06-cv-00301)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 23, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Lee Cason, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ray Lee Cason seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of

appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (internal quotation marks and citations

omitted). Accord Bowles v. Russell, 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

May 25, 2007. In a September 11, 2007, order, the court reopened

the time for filing an appeal for fourteen days following the entry

of the order. The notice of appeal was filed on November 19, 2007,

after the reopened appeal period expired. Because Cason failed to

file a timely notice of appeal and no authority permits the court

to further extend or reopen the appeal period, we dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 91-6135.

#### Robbins *v.*Lynn.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Wayne R. Hellman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and
 c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter on the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005
/s/ Wayne R. Hellman
Document

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Executive Change of Control Severance Agreement by and between Civeo Corporation (the “Company”) and Al Schoening (“Executive”), dated July 13, 2015 (the “Executive Agreement”), is hereby entered into by the Company and Executive, effective as of July 20, 2020 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Executive Agreement. 
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Executive Agreement on the terms set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, the Executive Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.Section 4(A) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“(A)    Within 15 days of the expiration of the Release Period (as defined in Section 12), the Company shall pay to Executive in a lump sum, in cash, an amount equal to 2.0 times the sum of Executive’s (i) Termination Base Salary and (ii) Target AICP.”
2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the Executive Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
3.This Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas without regard to conflicts of law principles.
4.This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, including by electronic mail or facsimile, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Each counterpart may consist of a copy hereof containing multiple signature pages, each signed by one party, but together signed by both parties hereto.




103985817.2







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment effective for all purposes as of the Amendment Effective Date.  
                            
CIVEO CORPORATION




                            
By:     /s/ Bradley J. Dodson            
                            Name:  Bradley J. Dodson
                            Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer




                            EXECUTIVE






By:    /s/ Al Schoening            
                            Name: Al Schoening
                            
Signature Page to First Amendment to
Executive Change of Control Severance Agreement
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT

NUMBER                                                                  SHARES
________                        MEDCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.              _______
                                AUTHORIZED STOCK: 1,000,000
                                    CUSIP # 58404T 10 6
                                
THIS CERTIFIES THAT ____________________________

IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF ___________

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or duly authorized 
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the 
Registrar.

     Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures 
of its duly authorized officers. 

Dated: June 24, 1997         PREFERRED SERIES A STOCK


                                                        Countersigned
                                                HOLLADAY STOCK TRANSFER, INC.
                                            4350 East Camelback Road, Suite 100F
                                                   Phoenix, Arizona 85018
                                                       (602) 840-9019

[SEAL]    -----------------  -----------------           By:-------------------
          SECRETARY          PRESIDENT                   Authorized Signature
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1230 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1230

  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2017

  Ms. Lee (for herself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27924]

[[Page 94774]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 766 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-459, K2025-456.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27924 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 91805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27325]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2024-0001]

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  Week of November 18, 2024.

PLACE: Via Teleconference.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of November 18, 2024

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

10:00 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative); Kairos 
Power, LLC (Hermes 2 Test Reactor Facility), Docket Nos. 50-611-CP & 
50-612-CP, Mandatory Hearing Decision (Tentative) (Contact: Wesley 
Held: 301-287-3591).

    Additional Information: By a vote of 4-0 on November 18, 2024, the 
Commission determined pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1) and 10 CFR 9.107 
that this item be affirmed with less than one week notice to the 
public. The item will be affirmed in the meeting being held on November 
20, 2024. The public is invited to attend the Commission's meeting 
live; via teleconference. Details for joining the teleconference in 
listen only mode can be found at https://www.nrc.gov/pmns/mtg.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For more information or to verify 
the status of meetings, contact Wesley Held at 301-287-3591 or via 
email at [email protected]. The schedule for Commission meetings is 
subject to change on short notice.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the internet 
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/schedule.html.
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g., braille, large print), please notify Anne Silk, NRC 
Disability Program Specialist, at 301-287-0745, by videophone at 240-
428-3217, or by email at [email protected]. Determinations on requests 
for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    Members of the public may request to receive this information 
electronically. If you would like to be added to the distribution, 
please contact the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the 
Secretary, Washington, DC 20555, at 301-415-1969, or by email at 
[email protected] or [email protected].
    The NRC is holding the meeting under the authority of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

     Dated: November 18, 2024.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Wesley W. Held,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27325 Filed 11-18-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```