alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph A. Mollica, Ph.D., Chairman of theBoard, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph  A. Mollica, Ph.D.                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A.  Mollica, Ph.D.                                      |
| Chairman of  the Board, President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                           |
| May 12, 2003                                                   |

 

----
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 955-01

EX P ART E SAM UE L NIN O JR., Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. F 42357-A

I N THE 18 DI STRI CT COURT F ROM JOHNSON COUNT Y

T H

P er cur iam

. Y E A R Y

, J.

, f

il ed a diss enti ng opin ion in which S L A U G H T E R

, J.

, joi ned.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f f o ur co un t s o f o n l i n e s o l i ci t at i o n o f a m

i n o r an d s en

t en ced t o t h

ree

y ears ’ i m pri s o n m en t i n co un t 1 an d f i v e y ear s ’ i

m pri s o n m en t i n eac h o f t h e rem ai

n i n g co un t s

.

A ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct

cl erk f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t al l eges

, am

o n g o t h er t h i

n gs

, t h at h i s co n

v i ct i o n s are b as ed o n an un co n s t i t ut i o n al

s t at ut e.

T h i s Co urt

, i

n E x par te Lo

, h el d un co n s t i

t ut i o n al t h e o n l i

n e s o l i ci t at i o n o f a m

i n o r s t at ut e f

o r

wh i ch A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed. E x par te Lo

, 424 S. W

. 3d 10 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2013). A

ppl i can t f i l ed

t h i s h ab eas appl i cat i o n b as ed o n t h e Lo deci s i o n an d as ks t h at h i s co n v i ct i o n s b e s et as i de. T h e St at e2

reco m m en ds t h at rel i ef b e gr an

t ed i n t h i s caus e.

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed b as ed o n A

ppl i can t ’ s cl ai m t h at h e was co n

v i ct ed un der aut h o ri t y o f an

un co n s t i t ut i o n al s t at ut e. T h e j udgm en t s i n Ca us e No

. F 42357 i

n t h e 18 Di s t ri ct Co urt o f J o h n s o n th

Co un t y are s et as i de an d t h e caus e i s rem an ded s o t h e t ri al co urt can di s m i s s t h e i n di ct m en t

. T h e t ri al

co urt s h al l i s s ue an

y n ece s s ary b en ch warran t wi t h i n t en day s f

ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d Pardo n s an d Paro l es Di v i s i o n

.

Del i v ered: No v em

b er 18, 2020

Do n o t pub l i s h
p. 1



# OAR Box 1672 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 6 ) ll-A-5 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/30/200811:01:00AM

Sheet 6 of 132J 

## A-13-/3 JT-/I-5 "

Unite dStatee Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Environmenta l ProtectionPlannino andStandard s EPA-453/R-93-02 6 JUNE 199 3 Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Par k NC 2771 1 AI R 

## AEP A Protoco lfo r Equipmen t

Lea k Emissio nEstimate sEPA-453/R-93-02 6



# Protocol forEquipmentLeak EmissionEstimates

Emissio nStandard s Division

- -U.S . ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO

N AGENCY Offic e o f Ai r an

dRadiation Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Planning an

dStandard s Researc hTriangl e Park, . North , Carolina 2771 1

Jun e 199 3



# -2 P. 3P. 4

TABL E O F CONTENT

S Sectio nPag e FOREWOR

D i 1. 0 INTRODUCTION1- 1 2. 0 DEVELOPMENT O F EQUIPMENT LEA K EMISSIO NESTIMATE S ... . 2- 1 2. 1 Introductio n 2- 1 2. 2 Genera l Informatio n o n th e Approache s fo r Estimatin g Equipmen t Lea k Emission s . 2- 2 2.2. 1 Equipmen t Lea k Emissio n Estimatio n Approache s 2- 2 2.2. 2 Overvie wo f Equipmen t Lea k Dat a Collectio n 2- 5 2. 3 Approache s fo r Estimating Equipmen t Lea k Emission s 2- 8 2.3. 1 Averag e Emissio n Facto r Approac h.2- 9 2.3. 2 Screenin g Range s Approac h2-1 5 2.3. 3 EP ACorrelatio n Approac h2-2 0 2.3. 4 Unit-Specifi c Correlatio n Approac h
... . 2-3 0 2. 4 Specia l Topic s 2-3 7 2.4. 1 Speciatin g Emission s 2-3 7 2.4. 2 Usin g Respons e Factor s . . . . 2-3 9 2.4. 3 Monitorin g Instrumen t Typ e an d Calibratio n Ga s 2-4 3 2.4. 4 Estimatin g Emission s fo r Equipmen t No t Screene d 2-4 4 2.4. 5 Usin g Screening Dat a Collecte d a t Severa l Differen t Time s 2-4 4 2.4. 6 Estimatin g VO C Emissio n Rate s fro mEquipmen t Containin g Non-VOC' s 2-4 5 2.4. 7 Estimatin g Equipmen t Lea k Emission s o f Inorgani c Compound s 2-4 6 2. 5 Reference s . 2-4 8 •3. 0 SOURC E SCREENING3- 1 3. 1 Introductio n ..3- 1 3. 2 Monitorin g Instrument s 3- 1 3.2. 1 Operatin g Principle s an d Limitation s o f Portabl e VO C Detectio n Device s .3- 2 3.2. 2 Specification s and Performanc e Criteri a o f Portabl e VO C Detectio n Device s . . . . . . .3- 4 3.2. 3 Us e o f Monitorin g Device s Tha t D o No t Mee t Metho d 2 1 Requirement s 3-1 0 3. 3 Th e Screenin g Program3-1 2 3.3. 1 Identificatio n o f Equipmen t t o b e Screene d 3-1 2 3.3. 2 Procedur e fo r Screening 3-1 4 i i 

# 3P. 5 

# 1

TABL E O F CONTENT S (Continued ) Sectio nPag e
APPENDICE S AExampl e Calculation s A- l B Lea k Rat e Screenin g Valu e Correlatio n Developmen t and Revisio n o f SOCM I Correlation s an d Emissio n Factor s . .B- l C Respons e Factor s . C- l D Selectio n o f Sampl e Siz e fo r Screenin g Connector s . . .D- 1 E Referenc e Metho d 2 1 E- l F Developmen t o f Lea k Rat e Versu s Fractio n Leakin g Equation s an d Determinatio n o f LDA R Contro l Effectivenes s F- l

i v 

# 4
Exhibit 32.0

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) by Intervest
Bancshares Corporation (the Company), each of the undersigned, as the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lowell S. Dansker                                  
|Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                          
|October 24, 2008                                       
|                                                       
|/s/ John J. Arvonio                                    
|John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                          
|October 24, 2008                                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



43
No. 91-5644.

#### Spreitzer v. Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 402nd Army Field Support Battalion-Hawaii supports inaugural Home Station Combat Training Center

By Katie Nelson, 402nd AFSB Public Affairs Officer402nd Army Field Support Battalion-Hawaii

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
:?!T?.:EMTOF 

.. "ONTATIGI'I 

:T C'FtRAT!C\;; 

li 2 1 P I;- Bt 

UNITE D 

Thomas Newton Boiling 

Associate General Counsel ~ Regulator}. 

AllianceaA International 

(713)324-5606 

thanias.bolling(gcoflir.com 

April 21,2011 

BY HAND 

Ms. Renee V. Wright 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Joint Motion of Air Canada,' Austrian, British Midland, Continental, Lufthansa, 

LOT. SAS, Swiss. TAP and United. Docket DQT-OS'1'-2008-0234 

Dear Ms. Wright: 

In conjunction with the above-referenced Joint Motion asking the Department to 

recogni/e Brussels Airlines' participation in the Alliance Agreements as covered by the grant of 

antitrust immunity pursuant to Order 2009-7-10 filed contemporaneously herewith, Continental, 

Lufthansa and United are hereby submitting: (i) four copies of the Joint Motion that includes 

certain confidential exhibits; and (ii) certifications signed on behalf of Continental, Lufthansa 

and United. 

The documents referenced in (i) above contain confidential business infonnation and are 

being provided under seal marked "Confidential Treatment Requested Under § 302.12," 

consistent with the Department's Rule 12 procedures. Continental, Lufthansa and United hereby 

incorporate by reference the pending Motion of Continental. Lufthansa and United for 

Confidential Treatment also filed concurrently in Docket DOT-OST-2008-0234, and request 

confidential treatment of the documents produced herewith, for all of the reasons set forth in the 

Motion. 

Common names are used for airlines. 
UNITE D 

Ms. Renee V. Wright 

April 21, 2011 

Page 2 

Please do not hesitate to contact me should have any questions or need additional 

information. , „-^ 

Resp^ctftilly submitted, 

ii, • / 

L, 

.•^• \ 

Thomas Newton Boiling :'' 

Associate General Counsel -

Regulatory, Alliances & International 

United Air Lines, Inc. 

Continental Airlines, Inc. 

1600 Smith Street - HQSLG 

Houston, Texas 77002 

ihyjll^^bo 1] i .i\tjV;',coair.coni 

cc: Todd Homan 

Peter Irvine
No. 91-6266.

#### Stark *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 1 of 210/31/2014 16:36:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Catawba 1 Docket (050- 00413)

Fitness for Duty / IR120 - Testing LTA T - Training N - Training 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 172 - Simulator use LTA T - Training N - Training 

419

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Oversight / IR130 - Inadequate suprevision / command and control T - Training N - Training 

15

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR140 - Problem not completely or accurately identified M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

141 - Problem not properly classified or prioritized M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 150 - Programmatic deficiency T - Training N - Training 

524

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA T - Training N - Training 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements Q - Quality assurance / oversight M - Maintenance / Repair 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements T - Training N - Training 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

629

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010Page 2 of 210/31/2014 16:36:12

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Catawba 1 Docket (050- 00413)

Procedures & Reference Document / LER110 - No procedure / reference documents O - Operations S - Surveillance 

112 - Procedure / reference document contains human factors deficienc S - Surveillance 

O - Operations

210

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER192 - Work untimely O - Operations S - Surveillance 

198 - Worker distracted / interrupted O - Operations S - Surveillance 

210

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 21
Argued and submitted February 19,

affirmed June 23, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Bertha M. Gray, Claimant. Bertha M. GRAY, *Petitioner, v.*SAIF CORPORATION and American Legion #45, *Respondents.*

(90-14568; CA A74858)

854 P2d 1008

*218Dan Steelhammer, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Brothers, Drew & Steelhammer, Bend.

Michael 0. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

ROSSMAN, P. J.

*219ROSSMAN, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing the referee and holding that her current low back condition is not compensable.

Claimant injured her back at work in February, 1989. Employer accepted a claim for the injury, which was diagnosed as “acute lumbosacral strain.” She has continued to suffer back pain since the injury. The claim was closed in November, 1989, with no award for permanent disability. In the meantime, claimant had been seeing her treating physician, and he diagnosed a degenerative condition of the low back requiring surgery. He requested authorization for surgery in January, 1990. SAIF denied the claim in June, 1990, on the grounds that the current condition is not related to the compensable strain, and the compensable strain is not the major contributing cause of the need for treatment.

The Board found that claimant’s current condition is the result of a combination of her compensable strain and preexisting degenerative disc disease, and that the degenerative condition is the major contributing cause of the current symptoms. The Board determined that ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) is applicable. That subsection provides:

> “If a compensable injury combines with a preexisting disease or condition to cause or prolong disability or a need for treatment, the resultant condition is compensable only to the extent the compensable injury is and remains the major contributing cause of the disability or need for treatment.”

The circumstances of this case fall squarely within the statute. Because claimant’s preexisting degenerative condition combines with her compensable injury to cause her disability and need for treatment, claimant must show that the compensable injury is the major contributing cause of the disability and need for treatment. The Board’s conclusion that she has not met that burden is supported by its findings, and those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Even assuming, as claimant contends, that she has experienced an aggravation of her compensable claim, her condition is not compensable, because she has not satisfied the requirements of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B). *See Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari,*
      *220117 Or App 409, 844 P2d 258 (1992), *on recon*120 Or App 590, 853 P2d 315 (1993).

Affirmed.
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement  - Randall Carrigan



 Exhibit 10.34 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment is
effective as of December 31, 2010 and extends and amends an Employment Agreement among the employee listed on the signature page attached hereto (“Employee”) and Aveon Management L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(the “Company”) dated as of October 29, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”). 
 RECITALS

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Employment Agreement, if a “Capitalization Transaction” (as defined in the Employment
Agreement) has not closed on or prior to December 31, 2010, then the Employment Agreement is void and of no further force and effect; and 
 WHEREAS, in order to secure Employee’s further services, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the period during which a Capitalization Transaction may occur before the
Employment Agreement becomes void and of no further force or effect. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1.    Effective December 31, 2010, Section IA. of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace December 31, 2010, each place it occurs therein with “February 15,
2011”. 
 2.    The Company and Employee hereby reaffirm all terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement not expressly amended herein and agree that such terms and conditions shall otherwise remain in place. 

3.    The Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding
among the Company and Employee concerning the matters addressed by the Employment Agreement, and supersedes any and all previous agreements or understandings, whether written or oral, between or among the Company and Employee concerning the same.
The Company and Employee agree and acknowledge that there are no restrictions, promises, representations, warranties, covenants or undertakings, other than those expressly set forth or referred to herein or therein. 

4.    This Amendment is effective December 31, 2010. 

5.    This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be deemed one and the same
agreement and shall be deemed delivered by the Company and Employee when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the Company and Employee. 







 6.    This amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions or the conflict of laws provisions of any other jurisdiction which would cause the application of any law other than that of the State of Delaware. 

[signature page follows] 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has executed this Amendment as of December 31,
2010. 
  

					
	EMPLOYEE
		
	 /s/ Randy Carrigan
	 	
	Randy Carrigan
	
	AVEON MANAGEMENT L.L.C.
			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ John J. Hassett
	 	
		 	        Name: John J. Hassett
		 	        Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



  
 3
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT**
 **TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of AmeriChip International, Inc. .(the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2006, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Thomas
        Schwanitz ,
        Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
        that:
 
 The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        March 1, 2007
 
 /s/ Thomas
        Schwanitz
 Thomas
        Schwanitz ,
 Chief
        Financial Officer
Order entered February 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01075-CR

FRANCISCO LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-35119-S

ORDER

Before the Court is Deputy Official Court Reporter LaToya Young-Martinez’s February 

1, 2019 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The Court GRANTS the 

request and extends the time to file the reporter’s record until February 11, 2019. If Ms. YoungMartinez fails to file the record by February 11, 2019, the Court may utilize its available 

remedies, including ordering that she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Amber GivensDavis, Presiding Judge, 282nd Judicial District Court; LaToya Young-Martinez, deputy official 

court reporter, 282nd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE