alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas 

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00141-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 322nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 322-644937-18

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J., A.T., J.T., AND J.J., CHILDREN
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant is J.J.’s father.

1 The Department of Family and Protective Services

(DFPS) removed J.J. and his three half-siblings from Mother and placed them with 

their maternal grandmother while seeking family reunification and, alternatively, 

termination of parental rights. At the trial’s conclusion, the trial court made the 

grandmother the children’s permanent managing conservator and made Father a 

possessory conservator. 

Father’s brief is not a model of clarity. But to the extent we can identify his 

issues, we do not reach his argument that “the grounds for termination were not 

proven” because the trial court did not actually terminate Father’s parental rights.

2

And we overrule Father’s due-process complaints because he did not preserve them.

3

See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1 (setting out preservation-of-error requirements); Tex. R. Civ. 

1

We use aliases to refer to the child and his family members. See Tex. Fam. 

Code Ann. § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2).

2

Father argues that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to 

terminate his parental rights, but his rights were not terminated. We encourage greater 

attention to the record in the future. Further, as DFPS notes, Father’s brief does not 

address the trial court’s conservatorship order, and—in any event—the record before 

us does not reflect an abuse of discretion. See In re J.M., No. 02-17-00156-CV, 2017

WL 4542674, at *1, *5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 12, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).

3

Father complains that his due-process rights were violated because he did not 

receive any services from DFPS, but he did not raise or receive a ruling on this issue 

at trial. He also complains that he was not contacted by his counsel before trial, but he 

does not explain how he was harmed by any lack of contact in light of the record and 

the trial’s outcome. Cf. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1, 44.1.
3

P. 251 (setting out continuance requirements); In re L.M.I., 119 S.W.3d 707, 711 (Tex. 

2003); In re J.P.-L., 592 S.W.3d 559, 575 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2019, pet. denied).

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr

Elizabeth Kerr

Justice

Delivered: August 26, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,584
<SECURITIES>                                     2,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                      136
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,672
<PP&E>                                           2,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,887)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,974
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   149
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (110)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,063)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     736
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,327)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 760 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-451, K2025-448.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27918 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Edward W. ENGLANDER, et ux., petitioners, v. George E. MILLS, et al.

No. 96-1314.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 21, 1997.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      | Stantec Inc. |                                                |
|---------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                      |         |                                                |   |
| Date:      March 27, 2008 | By:          | /s/ Anthony      P. Franceschini               |   |
|                      |         | Name:      ANTHONY P. FRANCESCHINI, P. ENG          |   |
|                      |         | Title:      President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                      |         |                                                |   |

----

|                      | Stantec Inc. |                                                            |
|---------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |         |                                                            |   |
| Date:      March 27, 2008 | By:          | /s/ Donald      W. Wilson                                  |   |
|                      |         | Name:      DONALD W. WILSON, CA                                 |   |
|                      |         | Title:      Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                      |         |                                                            |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-30303

STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CUMMINS MID-SOUTH, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee

ROMEO PAPA, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:11-CV-2207

Before JONES, WIENER and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, 

record excerpts, and pertinent parts of the record. Having done so, we find no 

reversible error of law or fact and AFFIRM essentially for the reasons stated 

by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 9, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-30303 Document: 00512465176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2013
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00322-CV

In re The Oaklands Owners Association, Inc.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Based on the record before us, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Filed: July 17, 2015
No. 86-6029.

#### Rooney *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Speedus Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Finn,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2003


By:    /s/ Thomas M. Finn
       ---------------------
Name:  Thomas M. Finn
Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
No. 91-6115.

#### Brown et al. *v.*Casscells, Trustee for Casscells.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 337 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1399 

[Report No. 115–455] 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. COOK (for himself, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. SCHRADER, Mr. KNIGHT, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. HIMES, Mr. VALADAO, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. 

YODER, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. WEBER of Texas, 

Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, and Mr. KELLY of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 11, 2017 

Additional sponsors: Mr. STEWART, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. JORDAN, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. 

COFFMAN, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER, Mr. 

BARR, and Mr. PERLMUTTER

DECEMBER 11, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1399 RH

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1399 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Soda Ash 

5 Competitiveness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

7 Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal 

8 Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 

9 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

10 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under that Act, 

11 the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the out12 put of sodium compounds and related products at the 

13 point of shipment to market from Federal land in the 5- 

14 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 

15 Act shall be 2 percent. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 337 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1399 

[Report No. 115–455] 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be 

for other purposes. paid for sodium produced on Federal lands, and 

DECEMBER 11, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Statement by NSC Spokesperson Adrienne Watson on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s Trilateral Dialogue with Japan and the Republic of Korea

White House Briefing Room

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, National Security Secretariat Secretary General Akiba Takeo of Japan, and Director of the National Security Office of the Republic of Korea (ROK) Kim Sung-han will meet at the Headquarters of the United States Indo-Pacific Command in Honolulu, Hawaii on September 1, 2022.  The officials will meet bilaterally on August 31.  After the trilateral meeting, Mr. Sullivan will visit the United States Indo-Pacific Command to discuss our alliances in defense of the free and open Indo-Pacific.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 02, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 02, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A0978. MARCUS BROWN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
exv10w13






Exhibit 10.13




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

CHS INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

(2010 Restatement)



CHS Inc., pursuant to the power of amendment reserved to it in Section 7.1 of the CHS Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Plan”), hereby amends the Plan in the manner set forth
below effective as of the date executed below.




Section 4.4 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following new paragraph (f):




     (f) Special 2011 Contribution Credit for Carl Casale. Due to the fact that Mr. Casale
will not have satisfied the eligibility service requirements to become an active participant in the
Pension Plan for 2011, his 2011 contribution credits determined under both the Pension Plan and
Section 4.2(b) of this Plan will equal zero dollars ($0). Accordingly, if Carl Casale is an Active
Participant in this Plan on December 31, 2011, then notwithstanding Section 4.2(b), his Pension
Plan Account shall be credited with a contribution credit equal to the amount of the contribution
credit which would have been credited under the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2011 if he had been
an active participant in the Pension Plan since January 1, 2011, except that such credit shall be
determined as if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the
Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon his election under any
nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to
be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid
under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by
such an employer or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS
or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CHS Inc. has caused its name to be hereunto subscribed on this
15th day of December, 2010.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CHS INC.

 	 
	 	By 	/s/ John D. Johnson
 	 
	 	 	John D. Johnson 	 
	 	 	Its President and CEO
No. 91-6207.

#### Blackston *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-41031

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR ALBERTO RIOS-MELENDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:18-CR-940-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Alberto RiosMelendez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rios-Melendez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-41031 Document: 00514977913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2019
No. 18-41031

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-41031 Document: 00514977913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2019
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, Larry B. Prescott, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed thisQuarterly report on Form 10-Q of T.J.T., Inc.;

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, thisQuarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this Quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisQuarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Quarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)             designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisQuarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly report (the Evaluation Date);and

 

c)             presented in this Quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)            all significant deficiencies in the design or operationof internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data andhave identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

 

6.     The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this Quarterly report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/Larry B. Prescott    |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Larry B. Prescott       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 13, 2004            |

 

1

----