alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                          MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                  1,449,350
<SECURITIES>                                                            1,253,231
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           1,563,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                                33,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        4,973,148
<PP&E>                                                                    244,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          7,669,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   3,632,003
<BONDS>                                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                                    4,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              3,642,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            7,669,364
<SALES>                                                                 3,117,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        3,117,496
<CGS>                                                                   1,628,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           3,627,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        1,242,483 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           186,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       186,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              186,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                 .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 .04
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edd Robinson, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1006]

Judgment unani*859mously affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Warren,*47 NY2d 740). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
P130874c

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0874 0875, 0876, 0877 Focus Ready Draft 9/23/2013

ENGINEER: Hall \ REC

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

TLV/PEL:

None established.

Page 1P130874c

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (09/10/2013):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 10.00 ppb)

Page 2P130874c

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0874 0875, 0876, 0877

Page 3P130874c

Page 4P130874c

Page 5P130874c

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0874 0875, 0876, 0877

Page 6P130874c

Page 7P130874c

Page 8P130874c

Page 9
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1273 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1273

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication of 
  the basis for determinations that species are endangered species or 
              threatened species, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2017

   Mr. Newhouse (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Harper, Mr. 
  Cramer, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Chaffetz, and Mr. Tipton) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require publication of 
  the basis for determinations that species are endangered species or 
              threatened species, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Endangered Species 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH ON THE INTERNET THE BASIS FOR LISTINGS.

    Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1533(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) The Secretary shall make publicly available on the 
        Internet the best scientific and commercial data available that 
        are the basis for each regulation, including each proposed 
        regulation, promulgated under subsection (a)(1), except that, 
        at the request of a Governor or legislature of a State, the 
        Secretary shall not make available under this paragraph 
        information regarding which the State has determined public 
        disclosure is prohibited by a law of that State relating to the 
        protection of personal information.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. THOMAS LONG.

*Indictment r- Overseer of Road — Ineurribent of OJfiee,.*

One who professes to be the incumbent of an office and performs the duties of the same is estopped from denying the legality of his appointment ; Therefore, where in an indictment for failure to keep a public road in repair it was proven by *parol*evidence that the defendant professed to be overseer of the road and had in all respects acted as such *-r Held,*to be unnecessary to show his appointment by the Court record..

*(State*v. *Cansler, 75*N. C. 442, cited and approved.)

INDICTMENT against the defendant as Overseer of a Public Road, tried at Fall Term, 1876, of Alexander Superior Court, before Buxton, *J.*

The bill charging that the defendant had neglected to> keep the road over which he was overseer in good repair (Bat. Rev. eh. 82, § 41) was found at Spring Term, 1876, and it was in evidence that defendant for three or four years-previous to January, 1876, had acted as overseer of this road, occasionally summoning hands to work on it, and that.since that date some one else had acted as overseer.

The defendant denied that he was overseer and insisted that the State should produce the order of appointment of the Township Trustees. (Bat. Rev. ch. 104, § § 7-8)

By consent the question of law was reserved and a verdict of guilty rendered.

His Honor being of opinion that there was no evidence of a *de jure*appointment of defendant as overseer and that the fact that he hadjacted *de facto*as such was not sufficient to render him'liable in a criminal prosecution for mere non-feasance, decided the point of law in favor of defendant, directed the verdict to be set aside and a verdict of not guilty to be entered. From which ruling the Solicitor for the State appealed.

*255
      *Attorney General,*for the State.

*Mr. R. F. Armfield,*for the defendant.

Eaircloth, J.

The defendant was indicted as an overseer of a public road for failing to keep it in repair and was. convicted. The ground of appeal is that his appointment was proved by parol and not by the Court record ' The-proof was that he had professed to be overseer for three or-four years, had summoned the road hands and worked the road repeatedly, in other words had acted as overseer in all respects except that he failed to keep it in good order at all. times.”

It would be better to produce the record in such cases, but we think the defendant has concluded himself by his-own acts.

lie took the benefit of his office by not working as a hand,, and its other emoluments if any there be.

We have held that a Justice of the Peace who assumed, •the duties of the office and received the fees belonging; thereto, although he had not taken the oath of office, was - indictable for misbehavior in office. *State*v. *Cansler,*75 N. C. 442. And on the same principle we hold that the defendant is liable in the present case.

There is error. Let this be certified to the end that the? Court below may proceed according to law.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed-
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Joint Tactic Army Ground Station Reinforces Soldiers' Combat Tactics Training

By Airman 1st Class Sadie Colbert35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
[Cite as State ex rel. Whitt v. Coshocton Common Pleas Court , 2013-Ohio-3550.]

COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., STEPHEN H. WHITT Relator

-vsCOSHOCTON COMMON PLEAS COURT Respondent JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Hon. John W. Wise, J.

Case No. 2013CA0011

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Peti tion for Writ of Mandamus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 15, 2013

APPEARANCES: For Relator For Respondent STEPHEN H. WHITT JASON W. GIVEN L. E. C. I. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 56 318 Chestnut Street Lebanon, Ohio 45036 Coshocton, Ohio 43812Coshocton County, Case No. 2013CA0011 2
Wise, J. {¶1} Relator, Stephen H. Whitt, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Although it is not entirely clear what relief Relator seeks, the Court believes Relator is requesting the Respondent be ordered to cause certain people to be arrested on kidnapping charges. {¶2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss essentially arguing Relator has no clear legal right to the relief requested. {¶3} We find it unnecessary to address the claim raised in the Petition because we find Relator has failed to comply with the procedural requirements for a mandamus complaint. {¶4} Relator has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25 by failing to file an affidavit detailing his prior civil filings. The Supreme Court has held, “[t]he requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate's action to dismissal.” State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003–Ohio–2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5. Noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25 warrants dismissal. State ex rel. Graham v. Niemeyer (2005), 106 Ohio St.3d 466, 106–467, 835 N.E.2d 1250, 1251.Coshocton County, Case No. 2012CA0011 3
{¶5} Relator's failure to include the affidavit requires dismissal of this case. For this reason, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is dismissed.

By: Wise, J. Gwin, P. J., and Farmer, J., concur.

___________________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE

___________________________________ HON. W. SCOTT GWIN

___________________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER JWW/d 0722Coshocton County, Case No. 2013CA0011 4
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., STEPHEN H. : WHITT : : Relator : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : COSHOCTON COMMON PLEAS COURT : : Respondent : Case No. 2013CA0011

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Coshocton County, Ohio, is
dismissed. Costs assessed to Relator.

___________________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE

___________________________________ HON. W. SCOTT GWIN

___________________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER
#### John Seawell v. William Shomberger.

1 From Moore.

Action *qui tam.*— In an action to recover the penalty given by the statute against usury, it is not necessary to shew that the principle money has been paid. The offence is complete, when any thing is received for the forbearance, over and above the rate of six per cent per year.

This was an action *qui tam,*to recover the penalty given by the statute against usury *;*and the facts were, that one J abez York was indebted to the Defendant upon a judgment rendered by a Justice of the Peace, and for forbearing the payment of the said judgment, the Defendant accepted and received from York a sum greater than at the rate, of six per cent, per year. The principal sum was unpaid, when the action was brought, and the question submitted to this Court was, whether as the principal sum was not paid, the Defendant was liable for one double the amount thereof, (the penalty given by the statute.)

Lowrie, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court: Our act of Assembly on this subject, is copied from the *12Hi Ann. ch.*16, and the construction given to this latter statute, ought to be given to ours. It is laid down by Lord Chief-Justice De Grey, in the case of *Loyd qui tam*v. *Williams,*(3 *Wills.*261,) that “wherever parties make a contract for monies or other tilings and above the rate of five per centum per annum is received by the lender, the offence against the statute is complete; and even if the principal money shall never be paid, yet the offence is committed.” Judgment for the Plaintiff.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 23, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-0732 Lower Tribunal No. F09-25476A

________________ 

### Exzavier Robinson, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge. Exzavier Robinson, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gregory E. Abel, President of MidAmerican Funding, LLC  (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
 the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: August 6, 2010/s/ Gregory E. AbelGregory E. AbelPresident(principal executive officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JEROME RAHEEM SIMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-1265

August 14, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Julie Lyn Sercus, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (88)
<INVENTORY>                                          4
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,218
<PP&E>                                           2,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,079)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,681
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,483
<SALES>                                          1,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,511
<CGS>                                              570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 93602-93603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27794]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. P085405]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Extension; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') published a 
document in the Federal Register of November 4, 2024, concerning its 
proposal to extend for an additional three years the Office of 
Management and Budget (``OMB'') clearance for information collection 
requirements contained in the rules and regulations under the Pay-Per-
Call Rule. Shortly after publication, Commission staff learned the 
document contained an incorrect date. The Commission issues this 
correction to reflect the corrected date. The current information 
collection clearance expires on January 31, 2025, not January 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: P. Connell McNulty, Attorney, Division 
of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade 
Commission, (202) 326-2061, [email protected].

[[Page 93603]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice document submitted by Commission 
staff for publication contained a typographical error; specifically, 
the expiration date for the current OMB clearance was off by one year 
in the SUMMARY.

Correction

    In notice FR Doc. 2024-25559 appearing at 89 FR 87575 in the 
Federal Register of Monday, November 4, 2024, make the following 
correction. On page 87576, in the last sentence of the SUMMARY section, 
the date of ``January 30, 2024'' is corrected to read ``January 31, 
2025''.

    Dated: November 20, 2024.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27794 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
```
No. 82-34.

No. 82-226.

#### American Paper Institute, Inc. *v.*American Electric Power Service Corp. et al.; and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission *v.*American Electric Power Service Corp. et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 904.] Motion of Edison Electric Institute for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III's Phone Call with Australian Minister of Defense Linda Reynolds

DoD Release

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News