alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2022

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 18-1451 Summit Contracting Group, Inc. 08/24/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

2 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

3 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

4 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

5 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

6 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

7 16-1865 AJM Packaging Corporation 10/07/20 DFR 10/14/20 Closed

8 19-0723 Midwest Equipment Company 10/23/20 DFR 11/25/20 Closed

 9 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 11/18/20 DFR 12/10/20 Closed

10 18-1864 Henkels & McCoy, Inc. 12/07/20 DFR 12/23/20 Closed

11 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Closed

12 18-0731

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a 

Suncoast Behavioral Health 

Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Closed

13 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

14 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

15 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box Company, 

Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

16 20-0762 CentiMark Corporation 10/27/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

17 20-0653 Eastern Gas Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Closed

18 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Open

19 20-0541 Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey 

Cleary Builders 03/03/22 DFR 03/11/22 Open

20 18-0523 New River Electrical Corporation 03/28/22 REM
Page 2 of 2 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on March 31, 2022

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

21 19-0550

UHS of Denver, Inc., d/b/a 

Highlands Behavioral Health 

System

03/31/22 DFR

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quartertly Report of G/O International, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Jack L. Burns, President, Treasurer and director of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 11/15/04                              /s/Jack L. Burns
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Jack L. Burns
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director
No. 91-5789.

#### Villegas *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Anytime, Anywhere: Gryphon Pacific 20-1 Challenges Special Operators

By Staff Sgt. Benjamin Sutton18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Kunsan Safety: Leading through Hazards

By Tech. Sgt. Joshua Arends8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Wisconsin Guard Develops Partnership with Papua New Guinea

By Staff Sgt. Alice RipbergerWisconsin National Guard

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-50710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. EDUARDO DE LA CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1928-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eduardo De L a Cruz-Rodrigu ez ( De L a Cruz) appeals the s entence imposed following h i s g uilty plea to c onspiracy to possess with intent to distribute ma r ijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. The d istrict co u rt sentenced De La Cruz to 35 m o n t h s o f i mprisonment on each count, to run c onsecuti v e l y , f or a total o f 7 0 months and a t hree-year term of supervised release on each count, to be served concurrently. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 17, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-50710 Document: 00512211479 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2013No. 12-50710

De La Cruz argues that his s entence is procedurally u nreasonable because it is based on a clearly e rroneous finding that he lied either to the d istrict court

or to the probation officer a b o ut his employment status between 2008 and the time o f his arrest. We reject his argument that he preserved this is s u e for appeal. Cf. United States v. Gerezano-Rosales , 692 F.3d 393, 3 9 9 (5th Cir. 2012)(describing circumstances where objection w ould be futile) 1

. Accordingly,

we review De La Cruz’s argument for plain error. S ee Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); United States v. Lopez-Velasq u ez , 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir. 2008). Our review of the r ecord as a whole shows that the d istrict c ourt’s finding is plausible and, thus, n ot clearly e rron e o u s . S ee U n ited States v. C i sneros-Gutierrez , 517 F.3d 751, 764 ( 5th Cir. 2 008). Because there i s n o clearly erroneous fact, D e La Cruz cannot show that the district court clearly or obviously procedurally erred by basing the sentence o n a clearly erroneous fact. 2 See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. Moreover, nothing in the c ontext of the sentencing record o r in the d istrict co u rt’s statements o f i t s reasons for the s entence indicates that the d istrict co u rt s e l e c t ed the sentenced imposed based on its belief that De La Cruz lied. AFFIRMED.

1 Unlik e the s ituation in that cas e, here the d is trict jud ge did not im p ly that rais ing an objection w ould res ult in a lengthier s entence.

2 Als o as a res ult, the stand ard of review is not outcom e- d eterm inative here. 2 Case: 12-50710 Document: 00512211479 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2013
No. 82-759.

#### Kawasaki Motors Corp. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (No. 333-108144) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-104307 and 333-64932) of Commerce One, Inc.
of our report dated February 5, 2004, except for the 4th paragraph of Note 1 and Note 16,
which are as of March 14, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Commerce One, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

San Francisco, California
March 18, 2004

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

---
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 12, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Heather Brown, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the May 14, 2010 EPA site visit to the DCP Midstream Gas 

Processing Plant 

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the EPA site visit to the DCP 

Midstream Goldsmith Plant located near the town of Midland, Texas. The Goldsmith Plant is a 

natural gas processing plant equipped with a sulfur recovery unit.

II. LOCATION & DATE

Site visits were conducted near the town of Midland, in Ector County, Texas. The site 

visit took place on May 14, 2010.

III. ATTENDEES

DCP Midstream, LP

Greg Kaidos

John Igoe

Marty Smith

Michael Betz

EMS

Sean Mooney

Rion Carlos

TCEQ

Alice Cone

Robert Bradshaw
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/OAQPS)

Alex MacPherson, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Air Benefit and Cost Group

Bruce Moore, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Jodi Howard, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Nick Parsons, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Rachel Agnew, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Measurement Policy Group

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Phil Norwood

Robert Vogt

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
#### H. Hohensee Construction Company, Inc., Respondent, vs. City of Oshkosh, Appellant.

*March 11*—

April *9, 1940.*

*278
      *Harry E.*Meyer, city attorney, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Laus & Cook*of Oshkosh, and oral argument by *R. C. Laus*and L. /. *Cook.*

Martin, J.

From the foregoing findings, it appears that respondent company on April 27, 1936, entered into separate contracts, in writing, with the appellant city for the construction of what is known as the “North Bank Interceptor” and the “High Street Interceptor,” both being in connection with the construction of an intercepting sewer system' for the city of Oshkosh. The matter in dispute relates only to the amount due respondent company for the pumping of the accumulating waste and water out of the sewer in connection with the construction of the two^ interceptors.

There is no dispute as to the terms of the contracts between the parties concerning compensation to be paid respondent company for the pumping. Nor is there any dispute as to the number of days respondent was actually engaged in pumping during the construction of the two interceptors. The contracts required respondent to keep the sump free from accumulating waste and water, for which work respondent was to be paid on the basis of $12 per day on the North Bank Interceptor and on the basis of $15 per day on the High Street Interceptor. These prices call for the pumping of not to exceed one hundred fifty gallons per minute on the North Bank Interceptor and not to exceed one hundred gallons per minute on the High Street Interceptor. The estimated number of days for pumping on the North *279Bank Interceptor was one hundred twenty days and on the High Street Interceptor ninety days. The contracts provide for the collection of wastes from each interceptor in a sump and require the contractor, respondent, to keep the sump free from the accumulation of such waste by pumping.

It is conceded that the number of days referred to in the contracts were only estimates. It is further conceded that respondent is entitled to' be paid for the number of days of pumping actually necessary under its contracts. It further appears that when one interceptor was completed the supervising engineer by verbal order attempted to- require the contractor to do all of the pumping under one contract. The contracts are in writing and clearly the engineer had no power to alter the terms of the written contracts; that could only be accomplished by mutual consent.

We have carefully examined both contracts and all of the documents which by reference are made a part of each contract. No claim is made that the contracts were in any respect changed or modified by mutual consent of the parties. We fail to find any issue for trial other than an interpretation of the contracts. Respondent’s claims are not for “extras.” They are based strictly on and in accordance with the terms of the written contracts.

There being no issue of fact for trial, we are of the opinion that the court properly entered the summary judgment.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Buddy Squadron is Back for 51st Fighter Wing, Republic of Korea Air Forces

By  Staff Sgt. Skyler Combs51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6504

GARY WOMACK MCDONALD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RAYMOND SMITH, Administrator Caswell Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00362-JAB) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 31, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Tracy Cunningham, Jr., LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE T. CUNNINGHAM, JR., Southern Pines, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gary Womack McDonald seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McDonald has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1181 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1181

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

   Mr. Roe of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Conaway, and Mr. Wenstrup) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONS AS ADJUDICATED 
              MENTALLY INCOMPETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 5501A the following new section:
``Sec. 5501B. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as 
              adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes
    ``Notwithstanding any determination made by the Secretary under 
section 5501A of this title, in any case arising out of the 
administration by the Secretary of laws and benefits under this title, 
a person who is mentally incapacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or 
experiencing an extended loss of consciousness shall not be considered 
adjudicated as a mental defective under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of 
section 922 of title 18 without the order or finding of a judge, 
magistrate, or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that 
such person is a danger to himself or herself or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 5501A the following new item:

``5501B. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
                            mentally incompetent for certain 
                            purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```