alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Christopher F. Zerull, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
 c)  Disclosed in this report, any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005
/s/ Christopher F. Zerull
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27891]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 745 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-433, K2025-430.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27891 Filed 11-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hittite Microwave Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen G. Daly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated: February 26, 2010

/s/ STEPHEN G. DALY Stephen G. Daly Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hittite Microwave Corporation and will be retained by Hittite Microwave Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1417 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to allow the Museum 

to acquire, receive, possess, collect, ship, transport, import, and display 

firearms, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to 

allow the Museum to acquire, receive, possess, collect, 

ship, transport, import, and display firearms, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Law Enforce5 ment Museum Exhibits Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1417 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MU2 SEUM TO ACQUIRE, RECEIVE, POSSESS, COL3 LECT, SHIP, TRANSPORT, IMPORT, AND DIS4 PLAY FIREARMS. 

5 The National Law Enforcement Museum Act (Public 

6 Law 106–492) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 5. AUTHORITY OF MUSEUM TO ACQUIRE, RECEIVE, 

9 POSSESS, COLLECT, SHIP, TRANSPORT, IM10 PORT, AND DISPLAY FIREARMS. 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro12 vision of Federal law, or any law or any rule or regulations 

13 of a State or any political subdivision thereof, the Museum 

14 may acquire, receive, possess, collect, ship, transport, im15 port, and display firearms (as defined in section 921(a)(3) 

16 of title 18, United States Code, or section 5845(a) of the 

17 Internal Revenue Code of 1986) in fulfilling the purposes 

18 of the Museum. 

19 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF STATE.—In subsection (a), the 

20 term ‘State’ means the several States, the District of Co21 lumbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, 

22 Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is23 lands, American Samoa, and the possessions of the United 

24 States.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-110085) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan, the 2003 Equity Incentive Award Plan and the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of CancerVax Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2004
(except note 10 as to which the date is March 15, 2004), included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
March 25, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2002, included
in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Apple Hospitality
Two, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6204

CHARLES RAYMOND VETTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; RON ANGELONE; L. W.

HUFFMAN; CHIEF PHYSICIAN; DOCTOR SMITH,

Urologist; DOCTOR HOLLAND; DOCTOR SAKER;

DOCTOR ALVIG; NURSE WILSON; D. T. MAHON;

WARDEN NEUMEYAR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-256-R)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Raymond Vette, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Sheridan

Brennan, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

request for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Vette v. Allen, No. CA-95-256-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 1996). We

deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We

also deny Appellant's motion to add a defendant to the action.

AFFIRMED
#### In re Mitchell Alvin SNYDERMAN, Debtor. Mark S. LONDON, P.A., Plaintiff, v. Mitchell Alvin SNYDERMAN, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00539-BKC-SMW.

Adv. No. 81-0278-BKC-SMW-A.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

Sept. 8, 1981.

Alan W. Kaback, Coral Springs, Fla., for defendant.

*551Robert W. Weiss, Hollywood, Fla., for plaintiff.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SIDNEY M. WEAVER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This Cause came to be heard upon plaintiff’s Complaint Objecting to Discharge filed herein. The Court, having heard the testimony and examined the evidence presented, having observed the candor and demeanor of the witnesses, having considered the arguments of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, does hereby make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. Section 1471.

The debtor, prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition had engaged the services of the plaintiff in this action, Mark London, P.A., to represent him in an action for dissolution of marriage. In the course of that employment, the debtor, Mitchell Snyderman, discussed the possibility of filing bankruptcy. It was decided, at that time, not to file a bankruptcy petition. Between that discussion and the filing of the voluntary bankruptcy petition by Mr. Sny-derman’s present attorney, Alan W. Kaback on April 9,1981 approximately one year had elapsed. In the interim, Mr. Snyderman had incurred additional expenses on credit which the plaintiff alleges were made with no intent to repay the debt. This allegation fails for lack of proof. It cannot be assumed, based on a conversation with his former attorney one year prior, that subsequent credit purchases of the debtor were made in anticipation of being discharged in-bankruptcy.

The plaintiff further alleges that the debtor had in his possession a cash fund of Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollars which he transferred, removed or concealed with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud his creditors. The debtor admits that during the one year period in question he had approximately Eight Thousand ($8,000.00) Dollars which he used to pay his living expenses. The evidence presented by the plaintiff fails to support the allegations that the defendant misused funds with the intent to defraud his creditors.

In accordance with the foregoing, the relief sought by the plaintiff is hereby denied, and a judgment will be entered based upon these findings and conclusions.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7667

GABRIEL JON RIOS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN WILLIAMS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02329-SAL)

Submitted: March 30, 2022 Decided: April 20, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gabriel Jon Rios, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gabriel Jon Rios seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Rios’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. Rios also seeks to appeal the court’s subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e) motion.

The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Rios’ informal brief, we

conclude that Rios has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,176
<INVENTORY>                                     39,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,717
<PP&E>                                         225,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,738
<BONDS>                                        283,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   492,693
<SALES>                                        122,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,366
<CGS>                                           90,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,456
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,456
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EX-10.(b)






Form of Indemnification Agreement between Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (formerly
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc) and Directors (filed as Exhibit 10(f) to Form 10-K of Cliffs Natural
Resources Inc. on February 2, 2001 and incorporated by reference)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fighter Squadrons Excel from Any Location

By Senior Airman Brittany A. Chase35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                         <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-Mos             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997       
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997       
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         8,070             
<SECURITIES>                                   105               
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,873           
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,774)           
<INVENTORY>                                    83,047            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,111           
<PP&E>                                         25,894            
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,642)           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,817           
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,638           
<BONDS>                                        40,400            
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0             
<PREFERRED>                                    0             
<COMMON>                                       671               
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,173           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,817           
<SALES>                                        317,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,108           
<CGS>                                          183,813           
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,813           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,291           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,034             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (990)            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                30,014            
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,565            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,449           
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0            
<CHANGES>                                      0            
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,449             
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.26              
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26
        

                       


</TABLE>