alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Military Sealift Command-Charter Cape Hudson Sails the Pacific Pathways, Delivers for Cobra Gold

By Grady Fontana Military Sealift Command Far East 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E78]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, January 13, 2009

  Mr. GRAVES. Madam Speaker, I would like to state for the record my 
position on the following votes I missed due to personal reasons.
  On Wednesday, January 7, 2009, and Friday, January 9, 2009, I missed 
rollcall votes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Had I been present, I would have 
voted ``aye'' on rollcall votes 5, 6, 7 and 10 and ``nay'' on rollcall 
votes 8 and 9.

                          ____________________
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Santa Fe Visits Western Australia following Training

Submarine Group 7 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7135

KATHY REAVES, a/k/a Kathy Juanita Reaves,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORPORAL CHARLES M. DICKENS, Individually; SOUTH CAROLINA 

HIGHWAY PATROL; SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION; 

SOUTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES; SOUTH CAROLINA 

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; COUNTY OF MARLBORO,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARLBORO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:22-cv-00639-TLW)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7135 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Kathy Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX BUYCK & 

WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee South Carolina Law Enforcement 

Division. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7135 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Kathy Reaves appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for contempt 

and an order to show cause. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reaves’ informal brief does not challenge 

the basis for the district court’s disposition of the motion—namely, that it lacked 

jurisdiction over the motion due to Reaves’ then-pending appeal of the district court’s prior 

orders—she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Reaves v. Dickens, No. 4:22-cv-00639-TLW (D.S.C. 

Oct. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7135 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41135 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE RAMOS-CERDA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-718-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Ramos-Cerda has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramos-Cerda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
#### Guy BASS, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 84-1684.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 27, 1984.

Decided July 30, 1984.

Guy Bass, Jr., pro se.

Before HEANEY, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Guy Bass, Jr. appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set *406aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. While represented by counsel, Bass pled guilty to distributing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The United States Attorney recommended that Bass serve his federal sentence in the state institution in which he was already serving a fifteen year state sentence. The district court declined to follow this recommendation and sentenced Bass to three years federal imprisonment after expiration of his state sentence.

Under section 2255, after a guilty plea, the focus of collateral attack is limited to the nature of counsel’s advice and the voluntariness of the plea. *Tollett v. Henderson,*411 U.S. 258, 266, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 1607, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973). Bass attacks the voluntariness of his plea, alleging that he did not understand the consequences of his plea. Specifically, he maintains that he understood that he would be sentenced to a five year term to run concurrently with his state sentence. A thorough reading of the transcript of his change of plea proceeding suggests that the government initially offered this bargain but retracted it when it appeared impossible to achieve. In fact, the government twice stated that its only recommendation was that Bass serve his time in a state institution. In addition, the district court closely questioned Bass regarding his understanding that the court was not barred by the prosecution’s recommendation.

The change of plea transcript conclusively demonstrates that Bass did not have the expectation which he claimed in his petition. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), David Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|Date: October 29, 2010 | /s/ DAVID DUTTON
                     David DuttonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 11

- 00196

- CV

TIM P. DITTMAN AND DEBBIE L. DITTMAN

v. ANTHONY A. CERONE AND OOTZIE PROPERTIES

- HOU, LLC FORMERLY NAMED OOTZIE OF TEXAS, LLC
On Appeal from the 80th District Court of Harris County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2008

- 06679

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjud ged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 31, 2013
<PAGE>


CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC
EXHIBITS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Cingular Wireless LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stanley T. Sigman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.






                                        By:     /s/ Stanley T. Sigman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stanley T. Sigman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: March 7, 2005
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 11

<TABLE>

                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
          EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months Ended September 30,                
                                                      --------------------------------------------------------------- 
                                                                       1996                           1995          
                                                      -------------------------------- ------------------------------ 
                                                           Shares     Amount     EPS      Shares     Amount     EPS 
                                                      -------------------------------- ------------------------------ 
<S>                                                         <C>     <C>        <C>         <C>     <C>        <C>    
Net income attributable to common                                                                                   
   shareholders                                                     $   1,470                      $   924        
                                                                    =========                      =======        

Sharebase:
   Shares deemed outstanding at beginning of period         10,845                         7,282                    
   Weighted average shares issued pursuant to July                                                                    
       1996 public offering                                  1,953                             -                    
   Weighted average common share equivalents                   201                           536                    
   Weighted average shares issuable                             35                             -                    
                                                            ------                         -----                    
                                                                                                                      
                                                            13,034                         7,818                    
                                                            ======                         =====                    
                                                                                                                      
Net income per share                                                           $   0.11                       $  0.12
                                                                               ========                       =======
</TABLE>
No. 82-934.

#### Basic/Four Corp. *v.*Central Microfilm Service Corp.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Alexandria Visits Sasebo during Indo-Asia-Pacific Deployment 

By Lt. j. g. Justin HigginsUSS Alexandria Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Report of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Christopher F. Zerull, Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 16, 2005 /s/ Christopher F. Zerull
Christopher F. Zerull
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
#### State, Plaintiff in error, vs. Kitzerow and others, Defendants in error.

*April 3*

April *28, 1936.*

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, J. E. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, *William A. Zabel,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *Herman A. Mosher,*deputy district attorney, and *Francis A. Darnieder,*special assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Darnieder*and *Mr. Mosher.*

Per Curiam.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State v. Kitzerow, ante,*p. 436, 267 N. W. 71, and is ruled by the decision in that case.

The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
No. 90-5446.

#### Bolton *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Cottrill, Respondent, vs. Pinkerton, Appellant.

*November 1*0

December *8, 1931.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *D. K. Allen*and *A. H. Gruenewald,*both of Oshkosh, and oral argument by *Mr. Allen.*

*219For the respondent there was a brief by *B. A. Husting*and *J. L. Kelley,*both of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by *Mr. Kelley.*

Owen, J.

The plaintiff, Katherine Cottrill, resided at Oshkosh. She was an employee of the Equitable Reserve Association at Neenah. While riding from Oshkosh to Neenah on the morning of the 11th day of March, 1930, the automobile in which she was riding collided with an automobile driven by the defendant. She brought this action against the defendant to recover the damages sustained by her in the collision. The defendant pleaded in abatement that she had accepted compensation from her employer, by reason of which her cause of action against the defendant was assigned, and that at the time of the commencement of the action she had no right to maintain the same. The plea in abatement was overruled by the court. The appeal is from that order.

The order is not appealable. It does not “in effect determine the action nor prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken.” Nor does it fall within any of the other classes of orders made appealable by the provisions of sec. 274.33, Stats. Notwithstanding the order, a trial of the action may be had on the merits, and the order of the court overruling the plea in abatement may be reviewed upon an appeal from the final judgment. Sec. 274.34, Stats.; *Schlecht v. Anderson,*202 Wis. 305, 232 N. W. 566. If the issue presented by the plea had been raised by demurrer, an order sustaining or overruling the demurrer would have been appealable under the express provisions of sec. 274.33. Likewise, if the plea in abatement had been sustained it would have prevented a final judgment in the action, in which event the order would have been appealable under the express provisions of said section.

*220In this case the issue presented by the plea in abatement was tried by the court, resulting in the order overruling the plea. The case should have then proceeded to trial upon the merits, and the propriety of the order appealed from could have been raised upon an appeal from the final judgment. It follows that the court has no jurisdiction and the appeal should be dismissed.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1
                        EQUITY CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three months ended March 31, 
                                                       1997        1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>
Computation of earnings per 
  common and equivalent share:
Net income attributable to common stock............... $4,490,509  $2,237,126
                                                       ==========  ==========
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding........................... 20,089,372  14,849,260
Additional shares assuming 
  conversion of stock options.........................    303,171     222,897
Effect of restricted stock issued.....................     19,053      12,750
                                                       ----------  ----------

Weighted average shares for primary earnings
  per share........................................... 20,411,596  15,084,907

Incremental shares issuable using
  quarter-end market price:
    Conversion of stock options.......................     10,332      49,998
    Effect of restricted stock issued.................      1,029       4,903
                                                       ----------  ----------

Weighted average shares for fully diluted
  earnings per share.................................. 20,422,957  15,139,808
                                                       ==========  ==========

Primary earnings per common and
  equivalent share.................................... $     0.22  $     0.15
                                                       ==========  ==========

Fully diluted earnings per common and 
  equivalent share.................................... $     0.22  $     0.15
                                                       ==========  ==========
</TABLE>

                                       1