alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Worldwide
Entertainment & Sports Corp. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                  0001002325
<NAME>                                 WORLDWIDE ENTERTAINMENT & SPORTS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                           1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                   2,109,581
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              436,023
<ALLOWANCES>                               276,208
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,636,483
<PP&E>                                     107,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           4,469,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      866,536
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                130,903
<OTHER-SE>                               3,603,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             4,469,700
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           404,996
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,251,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,935,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,935,424)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,935,424)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Resin Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Pendura, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ Greg Pendura

Greg Pendura

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006
#### Paul E. Traviglia, Appellant, v Fleet Bank, N. A., Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 423]

In an action to recover damages, *inter alia,*for termination of employment in violation of Executive Law § 296 and defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered February 3, 1994, which, *inter alia,*granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, Paul Traviglia; formerly vice president of the defendant bank, was charged with sexual harassment by two subordinate female employees. Following an internal investigation of the complaints, the bank discharged the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action against the bank alleging, *inter alia,*that employees of the bank slandered him when they told bank customers that he had been discharged for sexual harassment, that the bank was obligated to pay him severance pay, and that his discharge was the product of sexual discrimination proscribed by Executive Law § 296.

Although an at-will employee, such as the plaintiff, may be terminated from employment for any reason, *(see, Sabetay v Sterling Drug,*69 NY2d 329; *Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293), such termination may not be based on the statutorily impermissible practices of the employer *(see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v County of Onondaga Sheriff’s Dept.,*71 NY2d 623, 630). The plaintiff contends that his termination constituted unlawful sexual discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296 because the bank’s sexual harassment policy was applied differently on the basis of the employee’s gender.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s cause of action based on the alleged violation of Executive Law § 296. The plaintiff’s factual allegations failed to make out a prima facie case of sexual discrimination since he did not show that he was treated differently from female employees in the same situation *(cf., State Div. of Human Rights v County of Onondaga Sheriff’s Dept., supra).*

The plaintiff’s defamation causes of action, which were based on statements by his fellow employees to bank customers, were *645properly dismissed *(see, Liberman v Gelstein,*80 NY2d 429; *Browne v Prudden-Winslow Co.,*195 App Div 419). In addition, the plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to severance pay as he was terminated "for cause”, and eligibility under the bank’s severance pay plan was explicitly limited to those employees dismissed "other than for cause”.

We find the plaintiffs remaining contentions to be without merit. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1323 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1323

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reduce unnecessary 
           emergency room visits under the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

  Mr. Collins of New York (for himself and Mr. Flores) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reduce unnecessary 
           emergency room visits under the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Unnecessary Emergency Room 
Visits under Medicaid Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE OPTION TO IMPOSE HIGHER COST SHARING FOR NONEMERGENCY USE 
              OF EMERGENCY ROOM SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1916 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396o) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ``up to twice the 
        nominal amount'' and inserting ``up to $25''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ``up to twice the 
        nominal amount'' and inserting ``up to $25''.
    (b) State Option for Alternative Premiums and Cost Sharing.--
Section 1916A(e)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396o-
1(e)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``twice the amount 
        determined to be nominal under section 1916'' and inserting 
        ``the amount specified in paragraph (3) of subsection (a) or 
        (b) (as applicable) of section 1916 with respect to non-
        emergency services''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``a nominal amount (as 
        otherwise determined under section 1916)'' and inserting ``the 
        amount specified in paragraph (3) of subsection (a) or (b) (as 
        applicable) of section 1916 with respect to non-emergency 
        services''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to items and services furnished on or after October 
1, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 3, 2013

p0626 

# Order

Clerk July 3, 2013

146652

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146652

COA: 306868

Kalamazoo CC: 2007

- 000165

- FC

ERVINE LEE DAVENPORT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. While the Court

o f Appeals erroneously failed to consider defendant’s claim in light of the United States

Supreme Court decision in Holbrook v Flynn , 475 US 560, 570; 106 S Ct 1340; 89 L Ed

2d 525 (1986) (“the question must be not whether jurors actually articulated a

cons ciousness of some prejudicial effect, but rather whether ‘an unacceptable risk is

presented of impermissible factors coming into play’”), citing Estelle v Williams , 425 US

501, 505; 96 S Ct 1691; 48 L Ed 2d 126 (1976), the error was harmless under the fact s of

this case. Given the substantial evidence of guilt presented at trial, we cannot conclude

that there was an unacceptable risk of impermissible factors coming into play.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

WILLIS L. DOUGLAS,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1600

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 21

- 4976, Judge Scott Laurer.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Willis L. Douglas ’s unopposed motion to voluntarily withdraw his appeal and the parties’ agreement as to the allocation of costs,

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is gr anted to the extent that t he appeal

is withdrawn

. Case: 23-1600 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 05/24/2023DOUGLAS v. MCDONOUGH 2

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

May 24

, 2023

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 24, 2023 Case: 23-1600 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 05/24/2023
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer and chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: May 18, 2010
/s/ Daniel W. HollisName:  Daniel W. HollisTitle: Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 21

List of Subsidiaries



|                                                       |  |                                
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------
|Name                                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation  
|                                                      
|Analogic Limited                                       |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANALOGIC FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION                     |  | U.S. Virgin Islands            
|Analogic Holding Luxembourg S.a.r.l.                   |  | Luxembourg                     
|ANALOGIC SECURITIES CORPORATION                        |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE II CORPORATION                             |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANA/DVENTURE 3 CORPORATION                             |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANADVENTURE DELAWARE, INC.                             |  | Delaware                       
|AnaSky Limited (formerly known as SKY COMPUTERS, INC.) |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANATEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION                      |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANEXA Corporation                                      |  | Massachusetts                  
|Anexa Financial Services, Inc.                         |  | Massachusetts                  
|ANRAD CORPORATION                                      |  | Province of Nova Scotia, Canada
|B-K Medical Holding ApS                                |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical ApS                                        |  | Denmark                        
|B-K Medical AB                                         |  | Sweden                         
|B-K Medical (Asia) Pte. Ltd.                           |  | Singapore                      
|B-K Medical Benelux NV/SA                              |  | Belgium                        
|B-K Medical Medizinische Systeme GmbH                  |  | Germany                        
|B-K Medicale S.r.L                                     |  | Italy                          
|B-K Medical Systems, Inc.                              |  | Massachusetts                  
|B-K Medical (China) Limited                            |  | Hong Kong                      
|Copley Controls Corporation                            |  | Massachusetts                  
|Copley Motion Systems, LLC                             |  | Delaware                       
|FTNI Inc.                                              |  | Province of Quebec, Canada     
|International Security Systems Corporation             |  | Massachusetts                  
|SKY Computers (Europe) Ltd.                            |  | England                        
|Sound Technology, Inc.                                 |  | Pennsylvania
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51076 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GABRIEL SANCHEZ-GARCIA, also known as Gabriel Andres Sanchez-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-73-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gabriel SanchezGarcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 2nd Infantry Division Artillery Stays Ready to 'Fight Tonight' with Training Exercise

By Pfc. Ethan Valetski

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    MEASURES PLACED ON THE CALENDAR

  The following bill was read the second time, and placed on the 
calendar:

       S. 22. A bill to designate certain land components of the 
     National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain 
     programs and activities in the Department of the Interior and 
     the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Yokota Passenger Terminal; Gateway to the Far East 

By Senior Airman Gabrielle Spalding374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas B. Specketer, Vice President and Controller of MidAmerican Energy Company (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended  March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 6, 2011/s/ Thomas B. SpecketerThomas B. SpecketerVice President and Controller(principal financial officer)
#### Hoeper and another, Appellants, vs. Wisconsin Tax Commission, Respondent.

*February 12, 1932.*

The following order was filed February 12, 1932:

Per Curiam.

The mandate of the United States supreme court upon appeal to review the judgment of this court in the above entitled cause having been received by the clerk of this court, on motion of the attorneys for the appellants it is ordered and adjudged that said mandate be filed and entered in this court, and that pursuant to the mandate thereof the judgment entered in this court in the above entitled cause on November 11, 1930 (202 Wis. 493, 233 N. W. 100), affirming the judgment of the circuit court for Marathon county therein, be and the same is in all things vacated and set aside.

It is further ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court for Marathon county appealed from be, and the same is hereby, reversed with costs in favor of the appellants and against the respondent Marathon ’ county, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said circuit court with directions to reverse that part of the judgment affecting income subsequent to October 22, 1927, and to render judgment in favor of appellants .in accordance with the opinion of the United States supreme court in *Hoeper v. Wisconsin Tax Comm.*284 U. S. 206, 52 Sup. Ct. 120.