Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39607 

regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and 

COMAR 26.01.31, discussed previously 

in section II of this rulemaking. EPA has 

made, and will continue to make, these 

documents generally available 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or may be 

viewed at the appropriate EPA office 

(see the ADDRESSES section of this 

preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule to 

approve revisions to Maryland 

regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and to 

approve the addition of COMAR 

26.01.31 into the Maryland SIP does not 

have tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 27, 2016. 

Shawn M. Garvin, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14394 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 55 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2004–0091; FRL–9947–72– 

Region 9] 

Outer Continental Shelf Air 

Regulations; Consistency Update for 

California 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to update a 

portion of the Outer Continental Shelf 

(‘‘OCS’’) Air Regulations. Requirements 

applying to OCS sources located within 

25 miles of States’ seaward boundaries 

must be updated periodically to remain 

consistent with the requirements of the 

corresponding onshore area (‘‘COA’’), as 

mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the 

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (‘‘the 

Act’’). The portion of the OCS air 

regulations that is being updated 

pertains to the requirements for OCS 

sources for which the Ventura County 

Air Pollution Control District (‘‘Ventura 

County APCD’’ or ‘‘District’’) is the 

designated COA. The intended effect of 

approving the OCS requirements for the 

Ventura County APCD is to regulate 

emissions from OCS sources in 

accordance with the requirements 

onshore. The changes to the existing 

requirements discussed in this 

document are proposed to be 

incorporated by reference into the Code 

of Federal Regulations and listed in the 

appendix to the OCS air regulations. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

July 18, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 

OAR–2004–0091 at http://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office 

Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be removed or edited 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christine Vineyard, Air Division (Air-4), 

U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 

947–4125, vineyard.christine@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background Information 

A. Why is the EPA taking this action? 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation 

A. What criteria were used to evaluate 

rules submitted to update 40 CFR part 

55? 

B. What requirements were submitted to 

update 40 CFR part 55? 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

IV. Administrative Requirements 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
39608 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

1The reader may refer to the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking, December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and 

the preamble to the final rule promulgated 

September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further 

background and information on the OCS 

regulations. 

2Each COA which has been delegated the 

authority to implement and enforce part 55 will use 

its administrative and procedural rules as onshore. 

However, in those instances where the EPA has not 

delegated authority to implement and enforce part 

55, the EPA will use its own administrative and 

procedural requirements to implement the 

substantive requirements. 40 CFR 55.14(c)(4). 

I. Background Information 

A. Why is the EPA taking this action? 

On September 4, 1992, the EPA 

promulgated 40 CFR part 55,1 which 

established requirements to control air 

pollution from OCS sources in order to 

attain and maintain federal and state 

ambient air quality standards and to 

comply with the provisions of part C of 

title I of the Act. Part 55 applies to all 

OCS sources offshore of the States 

except those located in the Gulf of 

Mexico west of 87.5 degrees longitude. 

Section 328 of the Act requires that for 

such sources located within 25 miles of 

a State’s seaward boundary, the 

requirements shall be the same as would 

be applicable if the sources were located 

in the COA. Because the OCS 

requirements are based on onshore 

requirements, and onshore requirements 

may change, section 328(a)(1) requires 

that the EPA update the OCS 

requirements as necessary to maintain 

consistency with onshore requirements. 

Pursuant to section 55.12 of the OCS 

rule, consistency reviews will occur (1) 

at least annually; (2) upon receipt of a 

Notice of Intent under section 55.4; or 

(3) when a state or local agency submits 

a rule to the EPA to be considered for 

incorporation by reference in part 55. 

This proposed action is being taken in 

response to the submittal of 

requirements by the Ventura County 

APCD on January 8, 2016. Public 

comments received in writing within 30 

days of publication of this document 

will be considered by the EPA before 

publishing a final rule. Section 328(a) of 

the Act requires that the EPA establish 

requirements to control air pollution 

from OCS sources located within 25 

miles of States’ seaward boundaries that 

are the same as onshore requirements. 

To comply with this statutory mandate, 

the EPA must incorporate applicable 

onshore rules into part 55 as they exist 

onshore. This limits the EPA’s 

flexibility in deciding which 

requirements will be incorporated into 

part 55 and prevents the EPA from 

making substantive changes to the 

requirements it incorporates. As a 

result, the EPA may be incorporating 

rules into part 55 that do not conform 

to all of the EPA’s state implementation 

plan (SIP) guidance or certain 

requirements of the Act. Consistency 

updates may result in the inclusion of 

state or local rules or regulations into 

part 55, even though the same rules may 

ultimately be disapproved for inclusion 

as part of the SIP. Inclusion in the OCS 

rule does not imply that a rule meets the 

requirements of the Act for SIP 

approval, nor does it imply that the rule 

will be approved by the EPA for 

inclusion in the SIP. 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation 

A. What criteria were used to evaluate 

rules submitted to update 40 CFR part 

55? 

In updating 40 CFR part 55, the EPA 

reviewed the rules submitted for 

inclusion in part 55 to ensure that they 

are rationally related to the attainment 

or maintenance of federal or state 

ambient air quality standards or part C 

of title I of the Act, that they are not 

designed expressly to prevent 

exploration and development of the 

OCS and that they are applicable to OCS 

sources. 40 CFR 55.1. The EPA has also 

evaluated the rules to ensure they are 

not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR 

55.12(e). The EPA has excluded 

administrative and procedural rules 2

that regulate toxics, which are not 

related to the attainment and 

maintenance of federal and state 

ambient air quality standards. 

B. What requirements were submitted to 

update 40 CFR part 55? 

After review of the requirements 

submitted by the Ventura County APCD 

against the criteria set forth above and 

in 40 CFR part 55, the EPA is proposing 

to make the following Ventura County 

APCD requirements applicable to OCS 

sources. Earlier versions of these District 

rules are currently implemented on the 

OCS. 

Rule No. Name Adoption or 

amended date 

42 ...................... Permit Fees .......................................................................................................................................................... 04/14/15 

74.15.1 .............. Boilers, steam Generators, and Process Heaters ................................................................................................ 06/23/15 

26.13 ................. New Source Review-Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) .................................................................... 11/10/15 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is proposing to 

include in a final EPA rule regulatory 

text that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

the Ventura County APCD rules 

described in Table 1 of this preamble. 

The EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these materials available 

through www.regulations.gov and at the 

EPA Region IX Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

IV. Administrative Requirements 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to establish 

requirements to control air pollution 

from OCS sources located within 25 

miles of States’ seaward boundaries that 

are the same as onshore air control 

requirements. To comply with this 

statutory mandate, the EPA must 

incorporate applicable onshore rules 

into part 55 as they exist onshore. 42 

U.S.C. 7627(a)(1); 40 CFR 55.12. Thus, 

in promulgating OCS consistency 

updates, the EPA’s role is to maintain 

consistency between OCS regulations 

and the regulations of onshore areas, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action simply updates the existing OCS 

requirements to make them consistent 

with requirements onshore, without the 

exercise of any policy discretion by the 

EPA. For that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39609 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because it does not 

have a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

nor does it impose substantial direct 

compliance costs on tribal governments, 

nor preempt tribal law. 

Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq., an agency may not conduct 

or sponsor, and a person is not required 

to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

OMB has approved the information 

collection requirements contained in 40 

CFR part 55 and, by extension, this 

update to the rules, and has assigned 

OMB control number 2060–0249. Notice 

of OMB’s approval of the EPA 

Information Collection Request (‘‘ICR’’) 

No. 1601.07 was published in the 

Federal Register on February 17, 2009 

(74 FR 7432). The approval expired 

January 31, 2012. As the EPA previously 

indicated (70 FR 65897–65898 

(November 1, 2005)), the annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

collection of information under 40 CFR 

part 55 is estimated to average 549 

hours per response, using the definition 

of burden provided in 44 U.S.C. 3502(2). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by November 25, 

2013. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Nitrogen oxides, Outer 

Continental Shelf, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Permits, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: June 3, 2016. 

Alexis Strauss, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, title 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, part 55, is proposed to be 

amended as follows: 

PART 55—OUTER CONTINENTAL 

SHELF AIR REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 55 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Section 328 of the Clean Air 

Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) as amended by 

Public Law 101–549. 

■ 2. Section 55.14 is amended by 

revising paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(H) to read as 

follows: 

§ 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS 

sources located within 25 miles of States’ 

seaward boundaries, by State. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(3) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

(H) Ventura County Air Pollution 

Control District Requirements 

Applicable to OCS Sources. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Appendix A to part 55 is amended 

by revising under the heading 

‘‘California’’ paragraph (b)(8) to read as 

follows: 

Appendix A to Part 55—Listing of State 

and Local Requirements Incorporated 

by Reference Into Part 55, by State 

* * * * * 

California 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(8) The following requirements are 

contained in Ventura County Air Pollution 

Control District Requirements Applicable to 

OCS Sources: 

Rule 2 .............................................. Definitions (Adopted 04/12/11). 

Rule 5 .............................................. Effective Date (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 6 .............................................. Severability (Adopted 11/21/78). 

Rule 7 .............................................. Boundaries (Adopted 06/14/77). 

Rule 10 ............................................ Permits Required (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 11 ............................................ Definition for Regulation II (Adopted 03/14/06). 

Rule 12 ............................................ Applications for Permits (Adopted 06/13/95). 

Rule 13 ............................................ Action on Applications for an Authority To Construct (Adopted 06/13/95). 

Rule 14 ............................................ Action on Applications for a Permit To Operate (Adopted 06/13/95). 

Rule 15.1 ......................................... Sampling and Testing Facilities (Adopted 10/12/93). 

Rule 16 ............................................ BACT Certification (Adopted 06/13/95). 

Rule 19 ............................................ Posting of Permits (Adopted 05/23/72). 

Rule 20 ............................................ Transfer of Permit (Adopted 05/23/72). 

Rule 23 ............................................ Exemptions From Permits (Adopted 04/12/11). 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
39610 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

Rule 24 ............................................ Source Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Emission Statements (Adopted 09/15/92).

Rule 26 ............................................ New Source Review—General (Adopted 03/14/06). 

Rule 26.1 ......................................... New Source Review—Definitions (Adopted 11/14/06). 

Rule 26.2 ......................................... New Source Review—Requirements (Adopted 05/14/02). 

Rule 26.3 ......................................... New Source Review—Exemptions (Adopted 3/14/06). 

Rule 26.6 ......................................... New Source Review—Calculations (Adopted 3/14/06). 

Rule 26.8 ......................................... New Source Review—Permit To Operate (Adopted 10/22/91). 

Rule 26.10 ....................................... New Source Review—Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)(Repealed 06/28/11). 

Rule 26.11 ....................................... New Source Review—ERC Evaluation at Time of Use (Adopted 05/14/02). 

Rule 26.12 ....................................... Federal Major Modifications (Adopted 06/27/06). 

Rule 26.13 ....................................... New Source Review—Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) (Adopted 11/10/15). 

Rule 28 ............................................ Revocation of Permits (Adopted 07/18/72). 

Rule 29 ............................................ Conditions on Permits (Adopted 03/14/06). 

Rule 30 ............................................ Permit Renewal (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 32 ............................................ Breakdown Conditions: Emergency Variances, A., B.1., and D. only. (Adopted 02/20/79). 

Rule 33 ............................................ Part 70 Permits—General (Adopted 04/12/11). 

Rule 33.1 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Definitions (Adopted 04/12/11). 

Rule 33.2 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Application Contents (Adopted 04/10/01). 

Rule 33.3 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Permit Content (Adopted 09/12/06). 

Rule 33.4 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Operational Flexibility (Adopted 04/10/01). 

Rule 33.5 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Timeframes for Applications, Review and Issuance (Adopted 10/12/93). 

Rule 33.6 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Permit Term and Permit Reissuance (Adopted 10/12/93). 

Rule 33.7 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Notification (Adopted 04/10/01). 

Rule 33.8 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Reopening of Permits (Adopted 10/12/93). 

Rule 33.9 ......................................... Part 70 Permits—Compliance Provisions (Adopted 04/10/01). 

Rule 33.10 ....................................... Part 70 Permits—General Part 70 Permits (Adopted 10/12/93). 

Rule 34 ............................................ Acid Deposition Control (Adopted 03/14/95). 

Rule 35 ............................................ Elective Emission Limits (Adopted 04/12/11). 

Rule 36 ............................................ New Source Review—Hazardous Air Pollutants (Adopted 10/06/98). 

Rule 42 ............................................ Permit Fees (Adopted 04/14/15). 

Rule 44 ............................................ Exemption Evaluation Fee (Adopted 04/08/08). 

Rule 45 ............................................ Plan Fees (Adopted 06/19/90). 

Rule 45.2 ......................................... Asbestos Removal Fees (Adopted 08/04/92). 

Rule 47 ............................................ Source Test, Emission Monitor, and Call-Back Fees (Adopted 06/22/99). 

Rule 50 ............................................ Opacity (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 52 ............................................ Particulate Matter—Concentration (Grain Loading) (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 53 ............................................ Particulate Matter—Process Weight (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 54 ............................................ Sulfur Compounds (Adopted 06/14/94). 

Rule 56 ............................................ Open Burning (Adopted 11/11/03). 

Rule 57 ............................................ Incinerators (Adopted 01/11/05). 

Rule 57.1 ......................................... Particulate Matter Emissions From Fuel Burning Equipment (Adopted 01/11/05). 

Rule 62.7 ......................................... Asbestos—Demolition and Renovation (Adopted 09/01/92). 

Rule 63 ............................................ Separation and Combination of Emissions (Adopted 11/21/78). 

Rule 64 ............................................ Sulfur Content of Fuels (Adopted 04/13/99). 

Rule 67 ............................................ Vacuum Producing Devices (Adopted 07/05/83). 

Rule 68 ............................................ Carbon Monoxide (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 71 ............................................ Crude Oil and Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted 12/13/94). 

Rule 71.1 ......................................... Crude Oil Production and Separation (Adopted 06/16/92). 

Rule 71.2 ......................................... Storage of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted 09/26/89). 

Rule 71.3 ......................................... Transfer of Reactive Organic Compound Liquids (Adopted 06/16/92). 

Rule 71.4 ......................................... Petroleum Sumps, Pits, Ponds, and Well Cellars (Adopted 06/08/93). 

Rule 71.5 ......................................... Glycol Dehydrators (Adopted 12/13/94). 

Rule 72 ............................................ New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)(Adopted 09/9/08). 

Rule 73 ............................................ National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS (Adopted 09/9/08). 

Rule 74 ............................................ Specific Source Standards (Adopted 07/06/76). 

Rule 74.1 ......................................... Abrasive Blasting (Adopted 11/12/91). 

Rule 74.2 ......................................... Architectural Coatings (Adopted 01/12/10). 

Rule 74.6 ......................................... Surface Cleaning and Degreasing (Adopted 11/11/03—effective 07/01/04). 

Rule 74.6.1 ...................................... Batch Loaded Vapor Degreasers (Adopted 11/11/03—effective 07/01/04). 

Rule 74.7 ......................................... Fugitive Emissions of Reactive Organic Compounds at Petroleum Refineries and Chemical Plants (Adopted 10/10/95). 

Rule 74.8 ......................................... Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Waste-Water Separators and Process Turnarounds (Adopted 07/05/

83). 

Rule 74.9 ......................................... Stationary Internal Combustion Engines (Adopted 11/08/05). 

Rule 74.10 ....................................... Components at Crude Oil Production Facilities and Natural Gas Production and Processing Facilities 

(Adopted 03/10/98). 

Rule 74.11 ....................................... Natural Gas-Fired Residential Water Heaters—Control of NOX (Adopted 05/11/10). 

Rule 74.11.1 .................................... Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Adopted 09/14/99). 

Rule 74.12 ....................................... Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products (Adopted 04/08/08). 

Rule 74.15 ....................................... Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters (5MMBTUs and greater) (Adopted 11/08/94). 

Rule 74.15.1 .................................... Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters (1 to 5 MMBTUs) (Adopted 06/23/15). 

Rule 74.16 ....................................... Oil Field Drilling Operations (Adopted 01/08/91). 

Rule 74.20 ....................................... Adhesives and Sealants (Adopted 01/11/05). 

Rule 74.23 ....................................... Stationary Gas Turbines (Adopted 1/08/02). 

Rule 74.24 ....................................... Marine Coating Operations (Adopted 11/11/03). 

Rule 74.24.1 .................................... Pleasure Craft Coating and Commercial Boatyard Operations (Adopted 01/08/02). 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39611 

Rule 74.26 ....................................... Crude Oil Storage Tank Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/08/94). 

Rule 74.27 ....................................... Gasoline and ROC Liquid Storage Tank Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/08/94). 

Rule 74.28 ....................................... Asphalt Roofing Operations (Adopted 05/10/94). 

Rule 74.30 ....................................... Wood Products Coatings (Adopted 06/27/06). 

Rule 75 ............................................ Circumvention (Adopted 11/27/78). 

Rule 101 .......................................... Sampling and Testing Facilities (Adopted 05/23/72). 

Rule 102 .......................................... Source Tests (Adopted 04/13/04). 

Rule 103 .......................................... Continuous Monitoring Systems (Adopted 02/09/99). 

Rule 154 .......................................... Stage 1 Episode Actions (Adopted 09/17/91). 

Rule 155 .......................................... Stage 2 Episode Actions (Adopted 09/17/91). 

Rule 156 .......................................... Stage 3 Episode Actions (Adopted 09/17/91). 

Rule 158 .......................................... Source Abatement Plans (Adopted 09/17/91). 

Rule 159 .......................................... Traffic Abatement Procedures (Adopted 09/17/91). 

Rule 220 .......................................... General Conformity (Adopted 05/09/95). 

Rule 230 .......................................... Notice To Comply (Adopted 9/9/08). 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–14279 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 1 

[WT Docket No. 15–180; DA 16–519] 

Comment Sought on Proposed 

Amended Nationwide Programmatic 

Agreement for the Collocation of 

Wireless Antennas 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission’s 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 

(Bureau) seeks public comment on a 

proposed Amended Nationwide 

Programmatic Agreement for the 

Collocation of Wireless Antennas to 

address the review of deployments of 

small wireless antennas and associated 

equipment under Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act 

(NHPA). 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

June 27, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by DA No. 16–519; WT 

Docket No. 15–180, by any of the 

following methods: 

D Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the Internet by 

accessing the Commission’s Electronic 

Comment Filing System (ECFS): http:// 

fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. 

D Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper should file an original and 

one copy of each filing. If more than one 

docket or rulemaking number appears in 

the caption of this proceeding, filers 

should submit two additional copies for 

each additional docket or rulemaking 

number. 

D Filings can be sent by hand or 

messenger delivery, by commercial 

overnight courier, or by first-class or 

overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All 

filings must be addressed to the 

Commission’s Secretary, Office of the 

Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

Æ All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the 

Commission’s Secretary must be 

delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 

12th St. SW., Room TW–A325, 

Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours 

are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand 

deliveries must be held together with 

rubber bands or fasteners. Any 

envelopes and boxes must be disposed 

of before entering the building. 

Æ Commercial overnight mail (other 

than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail 

and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 

East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, 

MD 20743. 

U.S. Postal Service first-class, 

Express, and Priority mail must be 

addressed to 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen DelSordo, (202) 418–1986 or 

stephen.delsordo@fcc.gov, or Paul 

D’Ari, 202–418–1550 or paul.dari@

fcc.gov. Media contact: Cecilia Sulhoff, 

(202) 418–0587 or cecilia.sulhoff@

fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Bureau’s document in, 

DA No. 16–519, WT Docket No. 15–180, 

released May 12, 2016. The full text of 

this document, including the associated 

attachments, is available for inspection 

and copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

ET Monday through Thursday or from 

8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in 

the FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. The 

complete text is also available on the 

Commission’s Web site at http://

wireless.fcc.gov, or by using the search 

function on the ECFS Web page at 

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. 

Alternative formats are available to 

persons with disabilities by sending an 

email to FCC504@fcc.gov or by calling 

the Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 

418–0432 (TTY). 

By this document, the Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) 

seeks public comment on the proposed 

Amended Nationwide Programmatic 

Agreement for the Collocation of 

Wireless Antennas (Amended 

Collocation Agreement) to address the 

review of deployments of small wireless 

antennas and associated equipment 

under Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (54 

U.S.C. 306108 (formerly codified at 16 

U.S.C. 470f)). The Bureau proposes to 

amend the current Nationwide 

Programmatic Agreement for the 

Collocation of Wireless Antennas 

(Collocation Agreement) (47 CFR pt. 1, 

App. B) to account for the limited 

potential of small wireless antennas and 

associated equipment, including 

Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and 

small cell facilities, to affect historic 

properties. The Bureau also proposes 

minor amendments intended to clarify 

pre-existing provisions of the 

Collocation Agreement without 

modifying how those provisions will be 

administered going forward. 

The Bureau proposes these 

amendments in order to enable swift 

and responsible deployment of wireless 

broadband services—including 

deployments that will support next 

generation ‘‘5G’’ wireless service 

offerings—while maintaining the vital 

role that States and Tribal Nations play 

in reviewing projects with potentially 

significant effects. As Federal 

Communications Commission 

(‘‘Commission or FCC’’) Chairman 

Wheeler has observed, the evolution to 

5G is a ‘‘hinge moment’’ in 

technological advancement. The 

Bureau’s proposal is designed to 

leverage this moment and facilitate 

nationwide wireless broadband 

deployment while ensuring at the same 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS