alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) 

 ) DOCKET OST-2007-0038 

 for renewal of exemption authority ) 

(Guadalajara-San Antonio) ) 

__________________________________________) 

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

(202) 747-5212 

(240) 396-5362 fax 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, 

S.A. DE C.V.

 

February 1, 2013
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) 

 ) DOCKET OST-2007-0038 

 for renewal of exemption authority ) February 1, 2013 

(Guadalajara-San Antonio) ) 

__________________________________________) 

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF 

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

 By application dated November 30, 2012, Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de 

C.V. ("Aeromexico") requested renewal of the above-captioned exemption 

authority to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, 

property, and mail between Guadalajara, Mexico and San Antonio, Texas. 

That request was included in an application that aggregated renewal 

applications from ten separate dockets. 

Aeromexico respectfully amends that application to withdraw its 

application for renewal of Guadalajara-San Antonio authority, leaving no 

unexpired authority in Docket OST-2007-0038. (This is not intended to affect 

Aeromexico’s pending renewal requests in the remaining nine dockets 

referred to in the November 30 document.)
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 110/09/2008 15:08:07

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Harris 1 Docket (050- 00400)

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR173 - Physical conditions LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Oversight / IR130 - Inadequate suprevision / command and control O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR141 - Problem not properly classified or prioritized M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 146 - Evaluation LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 147 - Individual corrective action LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 

323

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA I - Instrumentation & Control H - Health Physics 185 - Procedural adherence LTA M - Mechanical M - Maintenance / Repair 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements D - Emergency Planning Q - Fire Protection 186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements H - Health Physics S - Surveillance 

646

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content O - Operations T - Testing 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / LER187 - Action implementation LTA O - Operations M - Maintenance / Repair 

18

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 13
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00137

- CV
Emory Powitzky Jr. v. Tilson Custom Homes , a/k/a Tilson Home Corporation

On Appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- 06

- 76483

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT O F APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this dec ision certified below for observance. October 29, 2015
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 732nd Air Mobility Squadron Supports 4/25 Deployment

By Airman 1st Class Christopher R. Morales673d Air Base Wing / Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6934
ANDRE HARVIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-68-2) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Andre Harvin, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harvin v. Angelone , No. CA-97-68-2 (E.D. Va. June 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

p0324

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

147955

RANDY BERKSHIRE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147955

COA: 314467

Ingham CC: 12-000277-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
16-11-12 Complainants Reply to Answer / Motion to Dismiss Exhibit 46

See Official Docket File @ FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC.

For assistance, please call 202-267-3473 or 202-267-3199.
ANTOINE DYSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0679

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Antoine Dyson, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for bel ated appeal is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         361,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               455,485
<PP&E>                                       3,505,808
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,409,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,607,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          431,518
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,010
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,631,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,607,969
<SALES>                                        951,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               951,875
<CGS>                                          473,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                232,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            178,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   178,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        



</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Camp Zama Teacher Volunteers to Teach Evening English Class for JGSDF Members

By Noriko KudoU.S. Army Garrison Japan Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Bartley, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 690]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered July 6, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Two police officers observed defendant standing in front of a building in an area known for drug trafficking, holding a shopping bag. A male approached defendant, whereupon the two looked up and down the street and then proceeded through the unlocked doors into the building lobby. The police followed, and observed defendant reaching into the bag as the other man held out currency. When the two made eye contact with the officers, defendant dropped the bag he had been holding and ran down a hallway, while the other man escaped up the *567stairs. A search of the bag revealed two packets of cocaine, ten vials of crack, thirteen $20 bills and thirty-three $1 bills.

Since a rational jury could conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People, showed that defendant intended to sell the drugs in his possession, the evidence was not legally insufficient to support the conviction *(see, People v Williams,*84 NY2d 925). Nor was the verdict against the weight of the evidence, since it cannot be concluded on this record that the jury’s findings of credibility and fact were "manifestly erroneous and so plainly unjustified by the evidence that rejection is required in the interest of justice” *(People v Corporan,*169 AD2d 643, *lv denied*77 NY2d 959; *see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the bag containing drugs and money since defendant abandoned the bag, and the abandonment was not prompted by any illegal action by the police, who merely entered a public lobby where defendant had no legitimate expectation of privacy *(People v Riley,*202 AD2d 336, *lv dismissed*84 NY2d 831; *People v Marrero,*173 AD2d 244, *lv dismissed*78 NY2d 969). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of G/O International, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the year ending March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Brian E. Rodriguez, President, Treasurer and director
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
  operations of the Registrant.

Dated: 5/11/06                               /s/Brian E. Rodriguez
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Brian E. Rodriguez
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ann Mather, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pixar; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2004     /s/ ANN MATHER   Ann Mather Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
31
No. 86-5977.

#### Stevenson *v.*Griswold.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Haw. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.