alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00876**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00876\00876_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00876\00876_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00876\00876_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00876\00876_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00876\00876_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00876\00876_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00876\00876_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00876\00876_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00876\00876_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00876\Supplemental Documents\00876_HW_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00876\Supplemental Documents\00876_HW_A5-3_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00876\Supplemental Documents\00876_HW_D3-1 POND DRAWING.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00876\Supplemental Documents\00876_HW_D5_10_Bid Proposal.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00876\Supplemental Documents\00876_HW_D5_10_Engineer Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 00876\00876_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Ladies
      and Gentleman:





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Featherlite, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Conrad D. Clement, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







**Featherlite,
                Inc.**Date: November
                10, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Conrad
                D.
                ClementChief
                Executive Officer
No. 90-732.

#### In re Kerlinsky.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certio-rari denied.
#### Will of Akin: First Wisconsin Trust Company, Executor, and others, Respondents, vs. The State, Appellant.

*November 12, 1936*

January *12, 1937.*

For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Joseph G. Hirschberg,*deputy attorney general, attorneys, and *Neil Conway,*inheritance tax counsel, of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Hirschberg*and *Mr. Conway.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Carbys, Kenney & Wolf,*attorneys, and *H. A. Sawyer,*guardian *ad litem,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *John 0. Carbys.*

Per Curiam.

The issues in this case are the same as those in *Will of LeFeber, ante,*p. 393, 271 N. W. 95, and the case is ruled by the decision therein. The order of the county court is affirmed.
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-3549

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Peter Hanson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 17, 2011 Filed: April 12, 2011

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Peter Hanson was charged with conspiri ng to distribute 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana. The government filed an info rmation alleging that he had a prior felony drug conviction, which increased the mandatory minimum sentence for a conviction to twenty years in prison. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 851. A jury found Hanson guilty of the charged conspiracy, and the district court 1 imposed the mandatory twenty-year sentence. Hanson appeals the sentence. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).-2- Hanson argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because, while he admittedly was involved ina marijuana trafficking conspiracy, the government’s evidence “was simply too unreliable to prove the drug quantity -- 1,000 or more kilograms -- beyond a reasonable doubt.” Although drug quantity is not an element of the crime unless it increases the statutory maximum punishment, see United States v. Webb , 545 F.3d 673, 678 (8th Cir. 2008), cert. denied , 129 S. Ct. 2013, 2021 (2009), Hanson’s statutory maximum sentence with a prior felony drug conviction would be ten years if he was c onvicted of conspiring to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D). Accordingly, at least this quantity question was properly submitted to the jury.
At trial, Hanson’s coconspirators testif ied about trips to Texas to buy marijuana that Hanson resold in Iowa. If believe d by the jury, the total amounts purchased, together with marijuana seized when two conspirators were arrested and additional quantities found in warrant searches of c onspirators’ homes, totaled well over 1000 kilograms of marijuana. These prosecu tion witnesses explai ned their cooperation agreements with the government, and it was up to the jury to determine their credibility. See United States v. Hodge , 594 F.3d 614, 618 (8th Cir. 20101). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdic t, as we must, the evidence was more than sufficient to support a quantity finding warranting the mandatory minimum twenty-year sentence.
After reviewing the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues fo r appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We gran t counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Hanson about the procedures for seeking rehearing by this court and filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court.

______________________________
Th, Jul. 31 EPA Hearing on proposed C02 limits Testify at 1:45 

Target parking lot, 6416 Carlisle Pike, Mechanicsburg 

Bus will depart promptly at 6:30a.m. and return by 7 p.m. 

Moorhead Federal Building, 1000 Liberty Avenue, Room 1310, Pittsburgh, PA 

Joy Bergey bergey@pennfuture.org 215-313-1311 

I am Steven Todd, a resident of Hummelstown, Pennsylvania. I am a municipal engineer. The EPA's 

proposed standard should be adopted as soon as possible without being changed in any way. 

As the science has now proven beyond any reasonable doubt the effect of man-made, global climate 

change, it is imperative to leave a livable planet to future generations, not only, but especially, for my 

12-yr old son Derek and for the children of those of lesser means who have no real chance to affect 

climate change. Lakota Grandmother Debra White Plume recently said, "We must protect our Sacred 

Water. For us this is spiritual work." No less sacred than the water we drink is the air we breathe. 

Here in Pennsylvania, we create nearly one percent of the world's total heat-trapping emissions, far 

disproportionate to our population. In live in Dauphin County which had 210 asthma attacks, 27 heart 

attacks and 15 deaths in 2012 caused by power plant pollution according to research from the Clean Air 

Task Force. Statistics like those are all the reason the EPA needs to implement the proposed standard. 

Implementing the standard will be a start to addressing the carbon emissions problem. It will not 

magically scrub our atmosphere of its excess carbon dioxide but it is a sound beginning. 

The EPA should consider what will happen if it decides not to implement the standard or water it down. 

Power plants will continue to dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into the air for free. They, the 

American public and the world will receive the message that the US has no interest in adopting 

reasonable carbon pollution safeguards to slow climate change. 

That disastrous outcome would doom Pennsylvania, the US and the planet to a future with poor air 

quality, rising temperatures and frequent extreme weather. 

Please implement the standard as written as soon as possible, and remember that natural gas-fired 

power plants are not the answer. Clean energy is the answer, and NG is not clean energy. Thank you. 

f#l# 

Steve Todd, PE, LEED AP, 629 Bullfrog Valley Road, Hummelstown, PA 17036-97 43, 

steventodd@hotmail.com
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E41]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      CELEBRATION OF MRS. MAGGIE KATIE BROWN KIDD'S 104TH BIRTHDAY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DAVID SCOTT

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 8, 2009

  Mr. SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, as the Proverb states, ``Who can 
find a virtuous woman? For her price is far above rubies.'' I rise 
today to recognize a truly virtuous woman whose life is not only far 
above rubies, but one of great milestones and accomplishments that is 
worthy of celebration. On December 8, 2008, Mrs. Maggie Katie Brown 
Kidd will turn 104 years old and I am honored to serve as a spokesman 
for Mrs. Kidd's family members and friends who will recognized her 
birthday with a party in November of last year.
  Born during President Theodore Roosevelt's second term in office, 
Mrs. Kidd has been blessed to see 17 Presidents in her lifetime. The 
eleventh and youngest child of William and Lucy Brown, Mrs. Kidd 
learned the importance of hard work and faith in God at an early age. 
Baptized at the Mount Zion Baptist by the Reverend Henry Gresham, she 
served under the leadership of the Reverend W.M. Combs until to she 
moved to her current home in Atlanta Ga. However, her faith is her Lord 
and her dedication to the church never left her and she instilled the 
traditions of faith and her work in her own family. She married the 
late Willie Kidd, III on November 30, 1940, and together they raised 
their two children, John and Rosalyn. She is also the proud grandmother 
to four and the great-grandmother to three and serves as the matriarch 
of her loving family.
  Mrs. Kidd's family describes her as a loving and selfless member of 
her community, offering her time and whatever she has to those in need. 
She is also an avid quilter and participates in family gathers and 
activities outside of Georgia. Her most favorite moments, however, are 
the ones on a quiet afternoon stitching in her favorite chair.
  Madam Speaker, I am so honored to serve Mrs. Kidds representative. 
Her life is a living history of the times and events that have shaped 
our great land and is a monument to how far we've come as a Nation. 
Moreover, her life serves as a testament to individuals and families 
everywhere that a strong unbinding faith in the Lord, coupled with hard 
work and a dedication to family will carry you far in life. As the 
Proverb states, ``favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman 
that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised''. Mrs. Maggie Katie Brown 
Kidd truly embodies the example of a virtuous woman and I ask my 
colleagues to join me in recognizing her life by wishing her a very 
happy 104th birthday.

                          ____________________
```
#### Gerbing, Respondent, vs. McDonald, Appellant.

*February 8*

March *4, 1930.*

*223For the appellant there was a brief by Richmond, *Jack-man, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison, and oral argument by *Harold M. Wilkie.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander, and oral argument by *A. J. O’Melia.*

Per Curiam.

This case is ruled by the case of *Gerbing v. McDonald,*decided herewith *Xante,*p. 214, 229 N. W. 860). Judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Fritz, J., dissents.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Carl Vinson Strike Group, Japan Air Self-Defense Forces Conduct Bilateral Joint Exercise

By U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1378 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of doctors of chiropractic in the National Health Service Corps scholarship and loan repayment programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. HARPER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of doctors of chiropractic in the National Health Service Corps scholarship and loan repayment programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Health Serv5 ice Corps Improvement Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1378 IH

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF DOCTORS OF CHIROPRACTIC IN 

2 NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

3 (1) PRIMARY HEALTH CARE SERVICES.—Sec4 tion 331 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 254d) is amended— 

6 (A) in subsection (a)(3)(D), by striking 

7 ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘chiropractic, 

8 or mental health,’’; and 

9 (B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

10 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘doctors of 

11 chiropractic, and physician assistants’’. 

12 (2) SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 338A of 

13 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l) is 

14 amended— 

15 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘and 

16 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘doctors of 

17 chiropractic, and physician assistants’’; and 

18 (B) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘or 

19 other health profession’’ and inserting ‘‘chiro20 practic, or other health profession’’. 

21 (3) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.— 

22 (A) PARTICIPATION.—Section 338B of the 

23 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) 

24 is amended— 

25 (i) in subsection (a)(1), by striking 

26 ‘‘and physician assistants’’ and inserting 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1378 IH

1 ‘‘doctors of chiropractic, and physician as2 sistants’’; 

3 (ii) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by strik4 ing ‘‘or another health profession’’ and in5 serting ‘‘chiropractic, or another health 

6 profession’’; and 

7 (iii) in subsections (b)(1)(B) and 

8 (b)(1)(C)(ii), by striking the term ‘‘or 

9 other health profession’’ each place such 

10 term appears and inserting ‘‘chiropractic, 

11 or other health profession’’. 

12 (B) PERIOD OF OBLIGATED SERVICE.— 

13 Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 338C(b)(5)(C) 

14 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

15 254m(b)(5)(C)) are amended by striking the 

16 term ‘‘or other health profession’’ each place 

17 such term appears and inserting ‘‘chiropractic, 

18 or other health profession’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1406 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1406

 To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the slaughter of dogs and 
                      cats for human consumption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

Mr. Hastings (for himself, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Trott, and Mr. Brendan F. 
    Boyle of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit the slaughter of dogs and 
                      cats for human consumption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SLAUGHTER OF DOGS AND CATS FOR HUMAN 
              CONSUMPTION.

    The Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 30. PROHIBITION OF SLAUGHTER OF DOGS AND CATS FOR HUMAN 
              CONSUMPTION.

    ``(a) Prohibition.--No person may--
            ``(1) knowingly slaughter a dog or cat for human 
        consumption; or
            ``(2) knowingly ship, transport, move, deliver, receive, 
        possess, purchase, sell, or donate--
                    ``(A) a dog or cat to be slaughtered for human 
                consumption; or
                    ``(B) dog or cat parts for human consumption.
    ``(b) Penalty.--Any person who violates this section shall be 
subject to imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or a fine of not more 
than $2,500, or both.
    ``(c) Scope.--Subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to 
conduct in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or within the 
special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
    ``(d) Conflict With State Law.--This section shall not be construed 
to limit any State or local law or regulations protecting the welfare 
of animals or to prevent a State or local governing body from adopting 
and enforcing animal welfare laws and regulations that are more 
stringent than this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 24.7**POWER OF ATTORNEY**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS     WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), proposes shortly to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended(the “Act”), the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.     WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington, D. McAuslandand P. Chenard and each of them, as attorneys for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name,place and stead, and in each of the undersigned’s offices and capacities as an Officer and/or aDirector of the Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving andgranting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thingwhatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to all intentsand purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof,hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to bedone, by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of February 2007.         Signed: /s/ H. Onno Ruding   Name:  H. Onno Ruding   Title:  Director