##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1



---



|x | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



or



| ̈ | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Commission file number: 0-26994



---



ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                              |  |                                     
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                      |  | 94-2901952                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation ororganization) |  | (IRS Employer Identification Number)



301 Brannan Street,
San Francisco, California 94107

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)



(415) 543-7696

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈



Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes  x    No ̈



The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding as of July 30, 2004 was 33,205,062.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

INDEX



|                              |  |    |  |                                                                                       |  |   
|----------------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |  | 3 
|Item 1.                       |  |    |  | Financial Statements                                                                  |  | 3 
|                              |  |    |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets                                                 |  | 3 
|                              |  |    |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations                                       |  | 4 
|                              |  |    |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                                       |  | 5 
|                              |  |    |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                                  |  | 6 
|Item 2.                       |  |    |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 17
|Item 3.                       |  |    |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                            |  | 38
|Item 4.                       |  |    |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               |  | 39
|                              | 
|PART II. OTHER INFORMATION    |  | 40
|Item 1.                       |  |    |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  | 40
|Item 2.                       |  |    |  | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds                                             |  | 40
|Item 3.                       |  |    |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                       |  | 41
|Item 4.                       |  |    |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                   |  | 41
|Item 5.                       |  |    |  | Other Information                                                                     |  | 42
|Item 6.                       |  |    |  | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                      |  | 42
|                              | 
|Signatures                    |  | 43



EXPLANATORY NOTE



This Amendment No. 1 to Advent Software, Inc.s (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, is being filed in order to correct its previously issued condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004, and to correct our managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations. As a result, we have also updated Item 4. Controls and Procedures, as appropriate. The corrections are to properly account for restructuring charges for abandoned property and equipment; correct income taxes payable, deferred
income tax assets and liabilities; and, correct our classification of revenue and cost of revenue from our subsidiary, Second Street Securities, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. See Note 2
to the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussion. This Form 10-Q/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the original Form 10-Q, or modify or update the disclosures
therein in any way other than as required to reflect the amendment set forth in Note 2.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1. Financial Statements



ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------- | ------- | - | --------------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                           |  | (Restated,See Note 2) |         |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |  
|                                           |  | June 302004           |         |   | December 312003       |  
|ASSETS                                     |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Current assets:                            |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                  |  | $                     | 35,562  |   |                       | $ | 34,761  |  
|Marketable securities                      |  |                       | 131,348 |   |                       |   | 125,311 |  
|Accounts receivable, net                   |  |                       | 27,699  |   |                       |   | 17,448  |  
|Prepaid expenses and other                 |  |                       | 10,682  |   |                       |   | 11,526  |  
|Income taxes receivable                    |  |                       | 1,639   |   |                       |   | 1,639   |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total current assets                       |  |                       | 206,930 |   |                       |   | 190,685 |  
|Property and equipment, net                |  |                       | 19,140  |   |                       |   | 23,381  |  
|Goodwill                                   |  |                       | 92,822  |   |                       |   | 86,504  |  
|Other intangibles, net                     |  |                       | 25,557  |   |                       |   | 30,495  |  
|Other assets, net                          |  |                       | 13,707  |   |                       |   | 15,438  |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total assets                               |  | $                     | 358,156 |   |                       | $ | 346,503 |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|                                           |  |                      
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY       |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Current liabilities:                       |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Accounts payable                           |  | $                     | 2,540   |   |                       | $ | 1,320   |  
|Accrued liabilities                        |  |                       | 18,210  |   |                       |   | 16,101  |  
|Deferred revenues                          |  |                       | 50,604  |   |                       |   | 36,123  |  
|Income taxes payable                       |  |                       | 3,202   |   |                       |   | 3,596   |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                  |  |                       | 74,556  |   |                       |   | 57,140  |  
|Deferred income taxes                      |  |                       | 3,066   |   |                       |   | 2,812   |  
|Other long-term liabilities                |  |                       | 6,377   |   |                       |   | 3,482   |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total liabilities                          |  |                       | 83,999  |   |                       |   | 63,434  |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Stockholders equity:                      |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Common stock                               |  |                       | 332     |   |                       |   | 329     |  
|Additional paid-in capital                 |  |                       | 344,174 |   |                       |   | 340,394 |  
|Accumulated deficit                        |  |                       | (77,246 | ) |                       |   | (66,483 | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive income     |  |                       | 6,897   |   |                       |   | 8,829   |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total stockholders equity                 |  |                       | 274,157 |   |                       |   | 283,069 |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity |  | $                     | 358,156 |   |                       | $ | 346,503 |  
|                                           |  |                       |         |   |                       |   |         |  



The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ | - | ------- | --------------------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                             |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |   | Six Months Ended June 30 |  
|                                                                             |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |   |                          |   |         | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |   |         |  
|                                                                             |  | 2004                      |        |   | 2003                     |   |         | 2004                  |  |   | 2003    |  
|Net revenues:                                                                |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|License and development fees                                                 |  | $                         | 8,719  |   |                          | $ | 6,470   |                       |  | $ | 16,727  |   |  | $ | 13,212  |  
|Maintenance and other recurring                                              |  |                           | 23,314 |   |                          |   | 21,154  |                       |  |   | 46,200  |   |  |   | 42,294  |  
|Professional services and other                                              |  |                           | 3,991  |   |                          |   | 5,134   |                       |  |   | 8,819   |   |  |   | 10,296  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total net revenues                                                           |  |                           | 36,024 |   |                          |   | 32,758  |                       |  |   | 71,746  |   |  |   | 65,802  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |  
|Cost of revenues:                                                            |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|License and development fees                                                 |  |                           | 426    |   |                          |   | 703     |                       |  |   | 1,020   |   |  |   | 1,257   |  
|Maintenance and other recurring                                              |  |                           | 7,320  |   |                          |   | 7,662   |                       |  |   | 14,200  |   |  |   | 15,041  |  
|Professional services and other                                              |  |                           | 4,107  |   |                          |   | 4,740   |                       |  |   | 7,680   |   |  |   | 8,547   |  
|Amortization of developed technology                                         |  |                           | 1,350  |   |                          |   | 1,436   |                       |  |   | 2,692   |   |  |   | 2,871   |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total cost of revenues                                                       |  |                           | 13,203 |   |                          |   | 14,541  |                       |  |   | 25,592  |   |  |   | 27,716  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Gross margin                                                                 |  |                           | 22,821 |   |                          |   | 18,217  |                       |  |   | 46,154  |   |  |   | 38,086  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |  
|Operating expenses:                                                          |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Sales and marketing                                                          |  |                           | 9,276  |   |                          |   | 11,263  |                       |  |   | 18,069  |   |  |   | 22,718  |  
|Product development                                                          |  |                           | 8,501  |   |                          |   | 9,692   |                       |  |   | 16,353  |   |  |   | 19,059  |  
|General and administrative                                                   |  |                           | 6,207  |   |                          |   | 6,602   |                       |  |   | 12,188  |   |  |   | 11,914  |  
|Amortization of other intangibles                                            |  |                           | 2,060  |   |                          |   | 1,966   |                       |  |   | 4,084   |   |  |   | 3,891   |  
|Restructuring charges                                                        |  |                           | 5,903  |   |                          |   | 2,671   |                       |  |   | 5,860   |   |  |   | 6,160   |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total operating expenses                                                     |  |                           | 31,947 |   |                          |   | 32,194  |                       |  |   | 56,554  |   |  |   | 63,742  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss from operations                                                         |  |                           | (9,126 | ) |                          |   | (13,977 | )                     |  |   | (10,400 | ) |  |   | (25,656 | )
|Interest income and other expense, net                                       |  |                           | (142   | ) |                          |   | (3      | )                     |  |   | (16     | ) |  |   | 169     |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss before income taxes                                                     |  |                           | (9,268 | ) |                          |   | (13,980 | )                     |  |   | (10,416 | ) |  |   | (25,487 | )
|Benefit from income taxes                                                    |  |                           | (21    | ) |                          |   | (4,384  | )                     |  |   | (21     | ) |  |   | (8,411  | )
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                     |  | $                         | (9,247 | ) |                          | $ | (9,596  | )                     |  | $ | (10,395 | ) |  | $ | (17,076 | )
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                                         |  | $                         | (0.28  | ) |                          | $ | (0.30   | )                     |  | $ | (0.31   | ) |  | $ | (0.53   | )
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                          |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share |  |                           | 33,179 |   |                          |   | 32,123  |                       |  |   | 33,122  |   |  |   | 32,266  |  



The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                |  | Six Months EndedJune 30 |        
|                                                                                |  | (Restated,See Note 2)   |         |   |      |  
|                                                                                |  | 2004                    |         |   | 2003 |  
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net loss                                                                        |  | $                       | (10,395 | ) |      | $ | (17,076 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Non-cash stock based compensation                                               |  |                         | 18      |   |      |   | 171     |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                   |  |                         | 11,134  |   |      |   | 11,099  |  
|Non-cash restructuring charges                                                  |  |                         | 863     |   |      |   | 499     |  
|Loss on dispositions of fixed assets                                            |  |                         | 372     |   |      |   |        |  
|Provision for (reduction of) doubtful accounts                                  |  |                         | (175    | ) |      |   | (398    | )
|Other than temporary loss on investments                                        |  |                         |        |   |      |   | 1,732   |  
|Loss on investments                                                             |  |                         | 717     |   |      |   | 109     |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                           |  |                         | (100    | ) |      |   | (6,715  | )
|Other                                                                           |  |                         | (232    | ) |      |   | 53      |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:     |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Accounts receivable                                                             |  |                         | (8,538  | ) |      |   | 3,490   |  
|Prepaid and other assets                                                        |  |                         | 3,499   |   |      |   | 2,339   |  
|Income taxes receivable                                                         |  |                         |        |   |      |   | 4,650   |  
|Accounts payable                                                                |  |                         | 120     |   |      |   | (567    | )
|Accrued liabilities                                                             |  |                         | 1,771   |   |      |   | (126    | )
|Deferred revenues                                                               |  |                         | 13,816  |   |      |   | 2,149   |  
|Income taxes payable                                                            |  |                         | (394    | ) |      |   | 1,551   |  
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                       |  |                         | 12,476  |   |      |   | 2,960   |  
|                                                                                |  |                        
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash used in acquisitions                                                   |  |                         | (5,756  | ) |      |   | (9,877  | )
|Purchases of property and equipment                                             |  |                         | (1,265  | ) |      |   | (4,082  | )
|Purchases of marketable securities                                              |  |                         | (73,505 | ) |      |   | (98,090 | )
|Sales and maturities of marketable securities                                   |  |                         | 65,498  |   |      |   | 113,637 |  
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities                             |  |                         | (15,028 | ) |      |   | 1,588   |  
|                                                                                |  |                        
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Proceeds from issuance of common stock                                          |  |                         | 4,263   |   |      |   | 4,455   |  
|Repurchase of common stock                                                      |  |                         | (858    | ) |      |   | (14,308 | )
|Repayment of capital leases                                                     |  |                         |        |   |      |   | (77     | )
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                             |  |                         | 3,405   |   |      |   | (9,930  | )
|                                                                                |  |                        
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents                    |  |                         | (52     | ) |      |   | 450     |  
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net change in cash and cash equivalents                                         |  |                         | 801     |   |      |   | (4,932  | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                |  |                         | 34,761  |   |      |   | 29,981  |  
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                      |  |                         | 35,562  |   |      | $ | 25,049  |  
|                                                                                |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |  



The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



Note 1Basis of Presentation



The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Advent Software, Inc. (Advent or the Company) and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.



Advent has prepared these condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) applicable to interim financial information. Certain information and footnote disclosures included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been omitted in these interim statements pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in Advents 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year, and no representation is made thereto.



These condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to state fairly the financial position
and results of operations for each interim period shown. All such adjustments occur in the ordinary course of business and are of a normal, recurring nature. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. These reclassifications do not affect net revenues, net loss or stockholders equity.



Accrued Restructuring.Certain restructuring liabilities have been reclassified from short-term to long-term. Advent has historically classified
all amounts accrued for restructuring expense as accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Based upon Advents re-evaluation of these liabilities, the Company has reclassified restructuring liabilities that
are to be paid more than a year after the balance sheet date to other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys results of operations or cash flows.
The following is a summary of the effect of these reclassifications on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004 (in thousands):



|                            |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ------ | -------------- |  | - | ------
|                            |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|                            |  | As PreviouslyReported                 |        | Reclassifications |   |        | AsReclassified
|December 31, 2003           |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|Accrued liabilities         |  | $                                     | 17,245 |                   | $ | (1,144 | )              |  | $ | 16,101
|Other long-term liabilities |  | $                                     | 2,338  |                   | $ | 1,144  |                |  | $ | 3,482 
|                            |  |                                       |       
|June 30, 2004               |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|Accrued liabilities         |  | $                                     | 22,334 |                   | $ | (4,124 | )              |  | $ | 18,210
|Other long-term liabilities |  | $                                     | 2,253  |                   | $ | 4,124  |                |  | $ | 6,377 



Auction Rate
Securities. Certain auction rate securities have been reclassified from cash equivalents to short-term marketable securities. Auction rate securities are variable rate bonds tied to short term interest rates with maturities on the face of the
securities in excess of 90 days. Auction rate securities have interest rate resets through a modified Dutch auction, at predetermined short term intervals, usually 7, 28 or 35 days. They trade at par and are callable at par on any interest payment
date at the option of the issuer. Interest paid during a given period is based upon the interest rate determined during the prior auction.



Although these securities are issued and rated as long term bonds, they are priced and traded as short term instruments because of their liquidity
provided through the interest rate reset. Advent has historically classified these instruments as cash equivalents if the period between interest rate resets was 90 days or less, which was based on Advents ability to either liquidate its
holding or roll the investment over to the next reset period.



Based upon Advents re-evaluation of the maturity dates associated with the underlying bonds, the Company has reclassified its auction rate securities, previously classified as cash equivalents, as short-term marketable securities in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004. In addition, Purchases of marketable securities and Sales and maturities of marketable securities, included in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, have been revised to reflect the purchase and sale of auction rate securities during the periods presented. As of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Company held approximately $48.6 million and
$74.3 million of these auction rate securities, which were reclassified. These reclassifications had no impact on the results of operations of the Company. The following is a summary of the effect of these reclassifications on the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, as well as the effect of these changes on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 (in
thousands):



|                                                     |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | ------- | -------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                     |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets           |        
|                                                     |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |         |   | Reclassifications |   |         | AsReclassified | 
|December 31, 2003                                    |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                            |  | $                                               | 83,334  |   |                   | $ | (48,573 | )              |  | $ | 34,761  |  
|Marketable securities                                |  | $                                               | 76,738  |   |                   | $ | 48,573  |                |  | $ | 125,311 |  
|                                                     |  |                                                 |        
|June 30, 2004                                        |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                            |  | $                                               | 109,847 |   |                   | $ | (74,285 | )              |  | $ | 35,562  |  
|Marketable securities                                |  | $                                               | 57,063  |   |                   | $ | 74,285  |                |  | $ | 131,348 |  
|                                                     | 
|                                                     |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |        
|                                                     |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |         |   | Reclassifications |   |         | AsReclassified | 
|Six months ended June 30, 2003                       |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Purchases of marketable securities                   |  | $                                               | (95,091 | ) |                   | $ | (2,999  | )              |  | $ | (98,090 | )
|Sales and maturities of marketable securities        |  | $                                               | 110,195 |   |                   | $ | 3,442   |                |  | $ | 113,637 |  
|Net cash provided by investing activities            |  | $                                               | 1,145   |   |                   | $ | 443     |                |  | $ | 1,588   |  
|Net change in cash and cash equivalents              |  | $                                               | (5,375  | ) |                   | $ | 443     |                |  | $ | (4,932  | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |  | $                                               | 78,906  |   |                   | $ | (48,925 | )              |  | $ | 29,981  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period       |  | $                                               | 73,531  |   |                   | $ | (48,482 | )              |  | $ | 25,049  |  
|                                                     |  |                                                 |        
|Six months ended June 30, 2004                       |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Purchases of marketable securities                   |  | $                                               | (45,014 | ) |                   | $ | (28,491 | )              |  | $ | (73,505 | )
|Sales and maturities of marketable securities        |  | $                                               | 62,719  |   |                   | $ | 2,779   |                |  | $ | 65,498  |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  |  | $                                               | 10,684  |   |                   | $ | (25,712 | )              |  | $ | (15,028 | )
|Net change in cash and cash equivalents              |  | $                                               | 26,513  |   |                   | $ | (25,712 | )              |  | $ | 801     |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |  | $                                               | 83,334  |   |                   | $ | (48,573 | )              |  | $ | 34,761  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period       |  | $                                               | 109,847 |   |                   | $ | (74,285 | )              |  | $ | 35,562  |  



Note 2Restatement of
Financial Statements



In connection with its preparation
of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, management of the Company determined that the previously issued financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 should be restated to correct errors in those financial statements. The decision to restate these financial
statements was made after managements discovery of the following errors:



| |  |  | Included in the Companys balance for income taxes payable at December 31, 2003 was a tax contingency reserve of $5.8 million. This reserve had been specifically established
for certain tax deductions that were included in the deferred tax asset balance at that date. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The establishment of this full valuation
allowance against the Companys deferred tax assets is described in Note 7, Income Taxes, to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Advent believes that the tax contingency reserve, which was established for the probable disallowance of certain tax deductions, should have been classified as a reduction of the related deferred tax assets and not as a separate liability at
December 31, 2003. As a result, the valuation allowance that was recorded in that year should be reduced by $5.8 million;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Estimated state income tax liabilities of $1.2 million had not been accrued in the year ended December 31, 2003. This error was not detected in the review process for the
Companys tax provision;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the Company vacated a facility in San Francisco, California and should have recognized additional non-cash restructuring charges related to
abandoned property and equipment. As a result, the Company has recognized additional non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 to reduce impaired property and equipment assets, and reduced depreciation expense
of $36,000 and $35,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Effective January 1, 2004, Advent corrected the classification of revenue from its subsidiary, Second Street Securities, when it enters into soft dollar
arrangements for third party
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



6



---

##### Table of Contents

| | products or services. Under such arrangements, Second Street Securities returns a portion of its commission revenues received from its customers in the form
of third party products or services. As a result, revenues and cost of revenues for the three quarterly periods ending March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004 have been restated to reflect revenue recognition on a net basis from these transactions
as Second Street Securities is not the primary obligor. This change does not affect gross margin, operating loss, or net loss for any periods presented. Advent has not changed revenues and cost of revenues in periods prior to fiscal 2004 as the
amounts were not material.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



These corrections
had no significant impact on the Companys financial statements in periods prior to the quarter ended December 31, 2003.



The following is a summary of the effect of these changes on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30,
2004, as well as the effect of these changes on the Companys condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, and condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2004 (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                           |  |                                       |         |   |             |   |        |             |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ----------- | - | ------ | ----------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                           |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |        
|December 31, 2003                          |  | As PreviouslyReported                 |         |   | Adjustments |   |        | As Restated | 
|Income taxes payable                       |  | $                                     | 8,206   |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 3,596   |  
|Total current liabilities                  |  | $                                     | 61,750  |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 57,140  |  
|Total liabilities                          |  | $                                     | 68,044  |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 63,434  |  
|Accumulated deficit                        |  | $                                     | (71,093 | ) |             | $ | 4,610  |             |  | $ | (66,483 | )
|Total stockholders equity                 |  | $                                     | 278,459 |   |             | $ | 4,610  |             |  | $ | 283,069 |  
|                                           |  |                                       |        
|June 30, 2004                              |  |                                       |         |   |             |   |        |             |  |   |         |  
|Property and equipment, net                |  | $                                     | 20,003  |   |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | 19,140  |  
|Total assets                               |  | $                                     | 359,019 |   |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | 358,156 |  
|Income taxes payable                       |  | $                                     | 7,812   |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 3,202   |  
|Total current liabilities                  |  | $                                     | 79,166  |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 74,556  |  
|Total liabilities                          |  | $                                     | 88,609  |   |             | $ | (4,610 | )           |  | $ | 83,999  |  
|Accumulated deficit                        |  | $                                     | (80,993 | ) |             | $ | 3,747  |             |  | $ | (77,246 | )
|Total stockholders equity                 |  | $                                     | 270,410 |   |             | $ | 3,747  |             |  | $ | 274,157 |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity |  | $                                     | 359,019 |   |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | 358,156 |  



7



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                |  |                                                 |        |   |             |   |        |             |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- | ------ | - | ----------- | - | ------ | ----------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |       
|Three months ended June 30, 2004                |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |        |   | Adjustments |   |        | As Restated | 
|Professional service and other revenues         |  | $                                               | 4,970  |   |             | $ | (979   | )           |  | $ | 3,991   |  
|Net revenues                                    |  | $                                               | 37,003 |   |             | $ | (979   | )           |  | $ | 36,024  |  
|Cost of professional service and other revenues |  | $                                               | 5,086  |   |             | $ | (979   | )           |  | $ | 4,107   |  
|Cost of revenues                                |  | $                                               | 14,182 |   |             | $ | (979   | )           |  | $ | 13,203  |  
|Gross margin                                    |  | $                                               | 22,821 |   |             | $ |       |             |  | $ | 22,821  |  
|Restructuring charges                           |  | $                                               | 5,040  |   |             | $ | 863    |             |  | $ | 5,903   |  
|Total operating expenses                        |  | $                                               | 31,084 |   |             | $ | 863    |             |  | $ | 31,947  |  
|Loss from operations                            |  | $                                               | (8,263 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (9,126  | )
|Loss before income taxes                        |  | $                                               | (8,405 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (9,268  | )
|Net loss                                        |  | $                                               | (8,384 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (9,247  | )
|Net loss per share                              |  | $                                               | (0.25  | ) |             | $ | (0.03  | )           |  | $ | (0.28   | )
|                                                |  |                                                 |       
|Six months ended June 30, 2004                  |  |                                                 |        |   |             |   |        |             | 
|Professional service and other revenues         |  | $                                               | 10,912 |   |             | $ | (2,093 | )           |  | $ | 8,819   |  
|Net revenues                                    |  | $                                               | 73,839 |   |             | $ | (2,093 | )           |  | $ | 71,746  |  
|Cost of professional service and other revenues |  | $                                               | 9,773  |   |             | $ | (2,093 | )           |  | $ | 7,680   |  
|Cost of revenues                                |  | $                                               | 27,685 |   |             | $ | (2,093 | )           |  | $ | 25,592  |  
|Gross margin                                    |  | $                                               | 46,154 |   |             | $ |       |             |  | $ | 46,154  |  
|Restructuring charges                           |  | $                                               | 4,997  |   |             | $ | 863    |             |  | $ | 5,860   |  
|Total operating expenses                        |  | $                                               | 55,691 |   |             | $ | 863    |             |  | $ | 56,554  |  
|Loss from operations                            |  | $                                               | (9,537 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (10,400 | )
|Loss before income taxes                        |  | $                                               | (9,553 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (10,416 | )
|Net loss                                        |  | $                                               | (9,532 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (10,395 | )
|Net loss per share                              |  | $                                               | (0.29  | ) |             | $ | (0.02  | )           |  | $ | (0.31   | )
|                                                | 
|                                                |  | Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  |       
|Six months ended June 30, 2004                  |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |        |   | Adjustments |   |        | As Restated | 
|Net loss                                        |  | $                                               | (9,532 | ) |             | $ | (863   | )           |  | $ | (10,395 | )
|Non-cash restructuring charges                  |  | $                                               |       |   |             | $ | 863    |             |  | $ | 863     |  



Note 3Recent Accounting
Pronouncements



In January 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was amended by FIN 46R in December 2003 (collectively FIN 46). FIN 46 expands upon and strengthens existing
accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used
for business purposes in which either (a) the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or (b) the equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest
entitys activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns or both (primary beneficiary).



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Advent adopted the provisions of FIN 46 in the first quarter of 2004. In conjunction with the adoption of
FIN 46, it was determined that Advents independent European distributor, Advent Europe Holding BV (Advent Europe) was a variable interest entity, but that Advent was not the primary beneficiary. In accordance with FIN 46, Advent
was not required to consolidate this distributor. Advent established a relationship with Advent Europe in 1998. Advent Europe and its subsidiaries have had the exclusive right to sell Advents software products, excluding Geneva, in certain
locations in Europe and the Middle East. From 2001 through 2003, Advent purchased five of Advent Europes subsidiaries. As discussed in Note 12, Acquisitions, Advent purchased on May 3, 2004 the remaining independent distributor
businesses of Advent Europe in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, as well as certain assets of Advent Europe, for initial consideration of $5.8 million and additional potential consideration of approximately $3.6 million, of which $1.8 million was
earned during the second quarter of 2004 and recorded as additional goodwill. Advent currently has no other exposure to loss as a result of involvement with Advent Europe.



In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition,
which supercedes Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. The primary purpose of SAB 104 is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple
element revenue arrangements, which was superceded as a result of the issuance of Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. SAB 104 also incorporated
certain sections of the SECs Revenue Recognition in Financial StatementsFrequently Asked Questions and Answers document. While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition
principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material impact on Advents condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Note 4Stock-Based Compensation



Advent uses the intrinsic value-based method as prescribed in the Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) to account for all stock-based employee compensation plans and has adopted the disclosure-only alternative of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation  Transition and Disclosure. Advent is required to
disclose the pro forma effects on operating results as if Advent had elected to use the fair value approach to account for all stock-based employee compensation plans. Stock-based compensation for non-employees is based on the fair value of the
related stock or options.



The fair value of warrants, options
or stock exchanged for services is expensed over the period benefited. The warrants and options are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.



If compensation had been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003,
consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, net loss and net loss per share would have been as follows (in thousands, except per-share data):



|                                                                                                                        |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------- | - | ----------------------- | - | ------- | --------------------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                        |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |         |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  
|                                                                                                                        |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |         |   |                         |   |         | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |   |         |  
|                                                                                                                        |  | 2004                      |         |   | 2003                    |   |         | 2004                  |  |   | 2003    |  
|Net loss - as reported                                                                                                  |  | $                         | (9,247  | ) |                         | $ | (9,596  | )                     |  | $ | (10,395 | ) |  | $ | (17,076 | )
|Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss, net of tax(1)                                  |  |                           | 6       |   |                         |   | 180     |                       |  |   | 18      |   |  |   | 175     |  
|Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all options, net of tax(1) |  |                           | (2,516  | ) |                         |   | (2,372  | )                     |  |   | (5,168  | ) |  |   | (4,020  | )
|                                                                                                                        |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss - pro forma                                                                                                    |  | $                         | (11,757 | ) |                         | $ | (11,788 | )                     |  | $ | (15,545 | ) |  |   | (20,921 | )
|                                                                                                                        |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net loss per share:                                                                                                     |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted - as reported                                                                                         |  | $                         | (0.28   | ) |                         | $ | (0.30   | )                     |  | $ | (0.31   | ) |  | $ | (0.53   | )
|                                                                                                                        |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted - pro forma                                                                                           |  | $                         | (0.35   | ) |                         | $ | (0.37   | )                     |  | $ | (0.47   | ) |  | $ | (0.65   | )
|                                                                                                                        |  |                           |         |   |                         |   |         |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  

---

|(1) | Assumes an effective tax rate of 0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and rates of 31% and 33% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003,
respectively.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The weighted-average grant-date
fair values of options granted were $18.95 and $18.71 per option for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $19.65 and $18.12 per option for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The weighted-average
fair values of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) rights were $15.21 per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and $12.82 per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

The fair value of each option grant and ESPP rights were estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:



|                             |  |                           |  |                         |  |          |  |         
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | -------- |  | --------
|                             |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |  | Six Months EndedJune 30
|Stock Options                |  | 2004                      |  | 2003                    |  | 2004     |  | 2003    
|Risk-free interest rate      |  | 3.7%                      |  | 2.5%                    |  | 3.3%     |  | 2.6%    
|Volatility                   |  | 66.0%                     |  | 72.0%                   |  | 66.0%    |  | 72.1%   
|Expected life                |  | 5 years                   |  | 5 years                 |  | 5 years  |  | 5 years 
|Expected dividends           |  | None                      |  | None                    |  | None     |  | None    
|                             |  |                           |  |                        
|Employee Stock Purchase Plan |  |                           |  |                         |  |          |  |         
|Risk-free interest rate      |  | 1.4%                      |  | 1.1%                    |  | 1.4%     |  | 1.1%    
|Volatility                   |  | 35.8%                     |  | 74.5%                   |  | 35.8%    |  | 74.5%   
|Expected life                |  | 6 months                  |  | 6 months                |  | 6 months |  | 6 months
|Expected dividends           |  | None                      |  | None                    |  | None     |  | None    



The ESPP periods begin
every six months in the second and fourth quarter of each year.



In the second quarter of 2003, in connection with the Companys voluntary stock option exchange program initiated in the fourth quarter of 2002, Advent granted 1,770,786 option shares to employees at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of the stock on the date of grant, which was $18.88 per share.



Note 5Net Loss Per Share



Basic net loss
per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock
options using the treasury stock method. Due to Advents net losses in the periods presented, options to purchase 5.6 million and 5.5 million common shares as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were excluded from the
computation of diluted net loss per share, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.



The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per-share data):



|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ----------------------- | - | ------ | --------------------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                             |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  
|                                                                             |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |   |                         |   |        | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |   |         |  
|                                                                             |  | 2004                      |        |   | 2003                    |   |        | 2004                  |  |   | 2003    |  
|Net loss                                                                     |  | $                         | (9,247 | ) |                         | $ | (9,596 | )                     |  | $ | (10,395 | ) |  | $ | (17,076 | )
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share |  |                           | 33,179 |   |                         |   | 32,123 |                       |  |   | 33,122  |   |  |   | 32,266  |  
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                                         |  | $                         | (0.28  | ) |                         | $ | (0.30  | )                     |  | $ | (0.31   | ) |  | $ | (0.53   | )
|                                                                             |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  



Note 6Goodwill



The changes in the carrying value of goodwill during the
six months ended June 30, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):



|                             |  |          |        |  
|---------------------------- |  | -------- | ------ | -
|                             |  | Goodwill |       
|Balance at December 31, 2003 |  | $        | 86,504 |  
|Additions                    |  |          | 7,482  |  
|Translation adjustments      |  |          | (1,164 | )
|                             |  |          |        |  
|Balance at June 30, 2004     |  | $        | 92,822 |  
|                             |  |          |        |  



Additions to goodwill
during the six months ended June 30, 2004 consisted of $1,796,000 for the achievement of certain earn-out provisions of the Advent Outsource Data Management acquisition agreement, consideration of $261,000 paid to the former shareholders of Techfi
Corporation which had been held in escrow for protection against undisclosed liabilities and $5,425,000 for the acquisition of Advent United Kingdom (UK) and Switzerland.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Advent reviews
goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year and more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss has occurred. During the fourth quarter of 2003, Advent completed the annual impairment
test which indicated that there was no impairment. Furthermore, there were no events or changes in circumstances during the first and second quarters of 2004 which triggered an impairment review.



Note 7Other Intangibles



The following is a summary of other intangibles as of June 30, 2004 (in
thousands):



|                         |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | ------
|                         |  | AverageAmortizationPeriod(Years) |  | OtherIntangibles,Gross |        | AccumulatedAmortization |   |         | OtherIntangibles,Net
|Purchased technologies   |  | 4.2                              |  | $                      | 20,481 |                         | $ | (13,706 | )                    |  | $ | 6,775 
|Customer relationships   |  | 4.9                              |  |                        | 32,130 |                         |   | (16,198 | )                    |  |   | 15,932
|Other intangibles        |  | 4.9                              |  |                        | 6,634  |                         |   | (3,784  | )                    |  |   | 2,850 
|                         |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       
|Balance at June 30, 2004 |  |                                  |  | $                      | 59,245 |                         | $ | (33,688 | )                    |  | $ | 25,557
|                         |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       



The following is a
summary of other intangibles as of December 31, 2003 (in thousands):



|                             |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | ------
|                             |  | AverageAmortizationPeriod(Years) |  | OtherIntangibles,Gross |        | AccumulatedAmortization |   |         | OtherIntangibles,Net
|Purchased technologies       |  | 4.2                              |  | $                      | 19,784 |                         | $ | (11,024 | )                    |  | $ | 8,760 
|Customer relationships       |  | 4.9                              |  |                        | 31,444 |                         |   | (12,840 | )                    |  |   | 18,604
|Other intangibles            |  | 5.0                              |  |                        | 6,405  |                         |   | (3,274  | )                    |  |   | 3,131 
|                             |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       
|Balance at December 31, 2003 |  |                                  |  | $                      | 57,633 |                         | $ | (27,138 | )                    |  | $ | 30,495
|                             |  |                                  |  |                        |        |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |       



The changes in the
carrying value of other intangibles during the six months ended June 30, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):



|                             |  |                        |        |   |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | - | ----------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | ------ | -
|                             |  | OtherIntangibles,Gross |        |   | AccumulatedAmortization |   |         | OtherIntangibles,Net | 
|Balance at December 31, 2003 |  | $                      | 57,633 |   |                         | $ | (27,138 | )                    |  | $ | 30,495 |  
|Additions                    |  |                        | 2,178  |   |                         |   |        |                      |  |   | 2,178  |  
|Amortization                 |  |                        |       |   |                         |   | (6,776  | )                    |  |   | (6,776 | )
|Translation adjustments      |  |                        | (566   | ) |                         |   | 226     |                      |  |   | (340   | )
|                             |  |                        |        |   |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |        |  
|Balance at June 30, 2004     |  | $                      | 59,245 |   |                         | $ | (33,688 | )                    |  | $ | 25,557 |  
|                             |  |                        |        |   |                         |   |         |                      |  |   |        |  



Amortization of
developed technology totaled $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and $2.7 million and $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Amortization of non-technology related intangibles totaled
$2.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and $4.1 million and $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Based on the carrying amount of other intangibles as of June 30, 2004, the estimated future amortization
is as follows (in thousands):



|                                                                    |  |                                   |       |                        |      |       |      |   |       |  |            |       |       |   |       |  |   |     |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ----- | ---------------------- | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---------- | ----- | ----- | - | ----- |  | - | --- |  | - | ------
|                                                                    |  | Six Months Ended December 31 2004 |       | Year Ended December 31 |      |       |      |  
|                                                                    |  |                                   | 2005  |                        | 2006 |       | 2007 |   | 2008  |  | Thereafter |       | Total
|Estimated future amortization of developed technology intangibles   |  | $                                 | 2,695 |                        | $    | 3,400 |      | $ | 600   |  | $          | 80    |       | $ |      |  | $ |    |  | $ | 6,775 
|Estimated future amortization of non-technology related intangibles |  |                                   | 4,171 |                        |      | 5,427 |      |   | 4,835 |  |            | 2,591 |       |   | 1,268 |  |   | 490 |  |   | 18,782
|                                                                    |  |                                   |       |                        |      |       |      |   |       |  |            |       |       |   |       |  |   |     |  |   |       
|                                                                    |  | $                                 | 6,866 |                        | $    | 8,827 |      | $ | 5,435 |  | $          | 2,671 |       | $ | 1,268 |  | $ | 490 |  | $ | 25,557
|                                                                    |  |                                   |       |                        |      |       |      |   |       |  |            |       |       |   |       |  |   |     |  |   |       



Note 8Balance Sheet Detail



Effective April 1, 2004, Advent changed its methodology
for recording accounts receivable and deferred revenues. In prior periods, Advent netted down any amounts in deferred revenues that were still outstanding as a receivable. Beginning on April 1, 2004, accounts receivable and deferred revenues are
presented gross instead of net, as no offset entry is made. This has the effect of increasing accounts receivable and deferred revenues by equal amounts. There is no impact on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.



Supplemental comparative disclosures, as if the change had been retroactively
applied, are presented below (in thousands):



|                         |  |                 |       
|------------------------ |  | --------------- | ------
|                         |  | December 312003
|Accounts receivable, net |  | $               | 32,752
|                         |  |                 |       
|Deferred revenues        |  | $               | 51,427
|                         |  |                 |       



The following is a
summary of other assets, net (in thousands):



|                        |  |             |        |                 |   |       
|----------------------- |  | ----------- | ------ | --------------- | - | ------
|                        |  | June 302004 |        | December 312003
|Long-term investments   |  | $           | 8,297  |                 | $ | 8,903 
|Long-term prepaids      |  |             | 4,026  |                 |   | 5,096 
|Other                   |  |             | 1,384  |                 |   | 1,439 
|                        |  |             |        |                 |   |       
|Total other assets, net |  | $           | 13,707 |                 | $ | 15,438
|                        |  |             |        |                 |   |       



Long-term investments
include equity investments in several privately held companies, most of which can still be considered in the start-up or development stages. In 2002, Advent acquired approximately 15% of the outstanding stock of LatentZero Limited
(LatentZero), a privately-held company located in the United Kingdom, for $7.0 million. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as Advents Chief Executive Officer is a member of LatentZeros
board of directors.



During the three and six months ended June
30, 2003, Advent recorded write-downs of $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, on various long-term equity investments, as a result of other-than-temporary declines in the estimated fair value of such investments. No write-downs were recorded
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. Advent recorded a loss of $335,000 and $606,000 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and $38,000 and $27,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003,
respectively, as a result of Advents pro rata share of net losses on its equity method investment. These amounts are included in interest income and other expense, net on Advents condensed consolidated statements of operations.



The following is a summary of accrued liabilities (in
thousands):



|                              |  |             |        |                 |   |       
|----------------------------- |  | ----------- | ------ | --------------- | - | ------
|                              |  | June 302004 |        | December 312003
|Salaries and benefits payable |  | $           | 5,990  |                 | $ | 7,479 
|Accrued restructuring         |  |             | 2,377  |                 |   | 1,201 
|Other                         |  |             | 9,843  |                 |   | 7,421 
|                              |  |             |        |                 |   |       
|Total accrued liabilities     |  | $           | 18,210 |                 | $ | 16,101
|                              |  |             |        |                 |   |       



Accrued restructuring
charges are discussed further in Note 10, Restructuring Charges. Other accrued liabilities include accruals for royalties, sales and business taxes, acquisition related costs, and other miscellaneous items.



The following is a summary of other long-term liabilities (in thousands):



|                                         |  |             |       |                 |   |      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | ----- | --------------- | - | -----
|                                         |  | June 302004 |       | December 312003
|Deferred rent                            |  | $           | 1,777 |                 | $ | 2,156
|Accrued restructuring, long-term portion |  |             | 4,124 |                 |   | 1,144
|Other                                    |  |             | 476   |                 |   | 182  
|                                         |  |             |       |                 |   |      
|Total other long-term liabilities        |  | $           | 6,377 |                 | $ | 3,482
|                                         |  |             |       |                 |   |      



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Note 9Comprehensive Income (Loss)



The components of comprehensive loss were as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):



|                                                            |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ----------------------- | - | ------ | --------------------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                            |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  
|                                                            |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |   |                         |   |        | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |   |         |  
|                                                            |  | 2004                      |        |   | 2003                    |   |        | 2004                  |  |   | 2003    |  
|Net loss                                                    |  | $                         | (9,247 | ) |                         | $ | (9,596 | )                     |  | $ | (10,395 | ) |  | $ | (17,076 | )
|Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax |  |                           | (496   | ) |                         |   | 144    |                       |  |   | (556    | ) |  |   | 94      |  
|Foreign currency translation adjustment                     |  |                           | (24    | ) |                         |   | 1,875  |                       |  |   | (1,376  | ) |  |   | 2,299   |  
|                                                            |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Comprehensive loss                                          |  | $                         | (9,767 | ) |                         | $ | (7,577 | )                     |  | $ | (12,327 | ) |  |   | (14,683 | )
|                                                            |  |                           |        |   |                         |   |        |                       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  



The components of
accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):



|                                                         |  |             |       |   |                 |   |       |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | ----- | - | --------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                                         |  | June 302004 |       |   | December 312003 |  
|Accumulated net unrealized loss on marketable securities |  | $           | (623  | ) |                 | $ | (67   | )
|Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments     |  |             | 7,520 |   |                 |   | 8,896 |  
|                                                         |  |             |       |   |                 |   |       |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                   |  | $           | 6,897 |   |                 | $ | 8,829 |  
|                                                         |  |             |       |   |                 |   |       |  



Note 10Restructuring Charges



In response to the downturn in the financial services
industry, the decline in information technology spending and duplicative efforts in parts of the business as a result of various acquisitions, Advent implemented several phases of restructuring beginning in 2003. These plans were implemented to
reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies by better aligning Advent with its near term revenue opportunities.



The restructuring charges recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows (in thousands):



|                                 |  |                           |       |                          |   |                       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------ | - | --------------------- |  | ---- | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                 |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       | Six Months Ended June 30
|                                 |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |       |                          |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |     
|                                 |  | 2004                      |       | 2003                     |   | 2004                  |  | 2003
|Facility exit costs              |  | $                         | 5,028 |                          | $ |                      |  | $    | 4,865 |  | $ | 2,101
|Severance and benefits           |  |                           | 12    |                          |   | 2,671                 |  |      | 132   |  |   | 3,650
|Property and equipment abandoned |  |                           | 863   |                          |   |                      |  |      | 863   |  |   | 409  
|                                 |  |                           |       |                          |   |                       |  |      |       |  |   |      
|Total                            |  | $                         | 5,903 |                          | $ | 2,671                 |  | $    | 5,860 |  | $ | 6,160
|                                 |  |                           |       |                          |   |                       |  |      |       |  |   |      



For the three months
ended June 30, 2004, Advent recorded a restructuring charge of $5.9 million primarily consisting of $4.9 million of facility and exit costs and $0.9 million of property and equipment impairment charges related to vacating a facility in San
Francisco, California, $72,000 related to vacating a portion of a facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a $12,000 adjustment related to severance for employees terminated in the first quarter of 2004. For the first quarter of fiscal 2004, Advent
recorded a net restructuring benefit of $43,000 consisting of a $163,000 adjustment related to entering into a final sub-lease agreement on one of the vacated facilities in New York, New York and a $16,000 adjustment to non-cash severance. These
adjustments were partially offset by a restructuring charge of $136,000 related to the termination of nine employees, located primarily in New York.



For the three months ended June 30, 2003, Advent recorded a restructuring charge of $2.7 million, primarily for severance and benefits related to the
termination of approximately 90 employees, from functions all across the company. For the first quarter of 2003, Advent recorded restructuring charges of $3.5 million or total charges of $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The
restructuring charges for the first quarter of 2003 consisted of $2.1 million related to the closing and consolidating of excess office space, primarily in New York and Australia; $1.0 million of severance and benefits related to the termination of
39 employees; and $410,000 related to the abandonment and write-off of certain equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth an analysis of the components of the restructuring charges, payments and
non-cash charges made against the accrual during the six months ended June 30, 2004 (in thousands):



|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- | ---- | - | ------------------ | - | ----- | --------------------- |  | - | --------------------------- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                       |  | PropertyandEquipmentAbandoned |      |   | Facility ExitCosts |   |       | Severance andBenefits |  |   | (Restated,See Note 2) Total |  
|Balance of restructuring accrual at December 31, 2003  |  | $                             |     |   |                    | $ | 2,181 |                       |  | $ | 164                         |   |  | $ | 2,345  |  
|Restructuring charges                                  |  |                               | 863  |   |                    |   | 5,028 |                       |  |   | 136                         |   |  |   | 6,027  |  
|Reversal of deferred rent related to facilities exited |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | 272   |                       |  |   |                            |   |  |   | 272    |  
|Cash payments                                          |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | (924  | )                     |  |   | (189                        | ) |  |   | (1,113 | )
|Adjustment of prior restructuring costs                |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | (163  | )                     |  |   | (4                          | ) |  |   | (167   | )
|Non-cash charges                                       |  |                               | (863 | ) |                    |   |      |                       |  |   |                            |   |  |   | (863   | )
|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance of restructuring accrual at June 30, 2004      |  | $                             |     |   |                    | $ | 6,394 |                       |  | $ | 107                         |   |  | $ | 6,501  |  
|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  



Of the remaining
restructuring accrual of $6.5 million at June 30, 2004, $2.4 million and $4.1 million are included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The remaining excess
facility costs are stated at estimated fair value, net of estimated sub-lease income of approximately $6.3 million. Advent expects to pay remaining obligations in connection with vacated facilities no later than over the remaining lease terms, which
expire on various dates through 2012. Advent expects to pay the remaining severance and benefits in 2004.



As of June 30, 2004, cumulative restructuring charges incurred since inception of Advents restructuring program in 2003 were $15 million, consisting
of $8.1 million, $5.1 million and $1.7 million relating to facility exit costs, severance and benefits, and property and equipment abandoned, respectively.



Note 11Common Stock Repurchase Programs



Advents Board of Directors (the Board) has approved common stock repurchase programs authorizing management to repurchase shares of the
Companys common stock in the open market. The timing and actual number of shares subject to repurchase are made at the discretion of Advents management and are contingent on a number of factors, including the price of Advents
stock, general market conditions, the Companys level of available cash and alternative investment opportunities. The purchases are funded from available working capital.



During 2001 and 2002, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 4.0 million shares of outstanding common stock. During
the first six months of 2003, Advent repurchased and retired 1.0 million shares of common stock at a cost of $14.3 million under this program. As of June 30, 2004, Advent has repurchased and retired 3.8 million shares of common stock since inception
of this stock repurchase program at a total cost of $78.8 million. Advent does not intend to make further purchases under this program.



In May 2004, the Board authorized the repurchase of an additional 1.2 million shares of outstanding common stock. During the six months ended June 30,
2004, 48,000 shares of common stock at a cost of $858,000 were repurchased under this program.



Note 12Acquisitions



On May 3, 2004, Advent acquired the remaining independent distributor businesses from its independent European distributor, Advent Europe, in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, as well as certain assets of Advent Europe. Advent made these
acquisitions in order to gain direct control over all of its European operations, which it views as an increasingly important market. The initial consideration of $5.8 million consisted of $5.7 million in cash, $91,000 of assumed liabilities and
$79,000 of closing costs. A total of $5.5 million of the cash consideration was paid at closing and the remaining $0.2 million was retained by the Company for possible breach of general representations and warranties. The Company will pay this
amount to Advent Europe approximately one year after the closing date in the event no such breach of general representations or warranties exists. In addition, there is a potential earn-out distribution to the selling stockholders of approximately
$3.6 million through December 31, 2004 under a formula based on revenue bookings. During the second quarter of 2004, approximately $1.8 million of the contingent consideration was earned and recorded as additional goodwill.



The acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired on the basis of their respective fair values on the acquisition date. The amounts allocated to identifiable
intangibles were determined based upon managements estimates using established valuation techniques. The results of operations of Advent United Kingdom and Advent Switzerland are included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations
from the date of acquisition.



The following unaudited pro
forma summary presents the consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. This does not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the acquisition been
made as of those dates nor of the results which may occur in the future (in thousands, except per share data):



|                                     |  |                                |        |   |                                |   |        |                              |  |   |                              |   |  |         |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------ | ------ | - | ------------------------------ | - | ------ | ---------------------------- |  | - | ---------------------------- | - |  | ------- | -
|                                     |  | (Restated,See Note 2)          |        |   |                                |   |        | (Restated,See Note 2)        |  |   |                              |  
|                                     |  | Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2004 |        |   | Three MonthsEndedJune 30, 2003 |   |        | Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2004 |  |   | Six MonthsEndedJune 30, 2003 |  
|Net revenues                         |  | $                              | 36,322 |   |                                | $ | 33,387 |                              |  | $ | 72,974                       |   |  | 66,680  |  
|Net loss                             |  | $                              | (9,400 | ) |                                | $ | (9,961 | )                            |  | $ | (11,145                      | ) |  | (17,997 | )
|Net loss per sharebasic and diluted |  | $                              | (0.28  | ) |                                | $ | (0.31  | )                            |  | $ | (0.34                        | ) |  | (0.56   | )



14



---

##### Table of Contents

The preliminary allocation of the purchase price for Advent United Kingdom, Advent Switzerland and
certain assets of Advent Europe was as follows (in thousands, except estimated remaining useful life):



|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------ | -
|                         |  | Estimated RemainingUseful Life(Years) |  | Purchase PriceAllocation |       
|Goodwill                 |  |                                       |  | $                        | 5,425  |  
|Customer relationships   |  | 4                                     |  |                          | 328    |  
|Sub-licensing agreements |  | 4                                     |  |                          | 908    |  
|Employment agreements    |  | 3                                     |  |                          | 232    |  
|Developed technology     |  | 3                                     |  |                          | 710    |  
|Tangible assets          |  |                                       |  |                          | 2,755  |  
|Current liabilities      |  |                                       |  |                          | (2,387 | )
|Deferred tax liabilities |  |                                       |  |                          | (337   | )
|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  
|Total purchase price     |  |                                       |  | $                        | 7,634  |  
|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  



In May 2003, Advent
purchased all of the common stock of Advent Netherlands BV from its independent European distributor for a total purchase price of $9.6 million, which includes repayment of a loan and is net of approximately $180,000 in cash acquired. In addition,
there was a potential earn-out distribution to the selling stockholders of up to $1.6 million through December 31, 2003 under a formula based on revenue results for the eight months ended December 31, 2003, plus 50% of any operating margins which
exceed 20% for the year ending December 31, 2004. The right to receive this earn-out was effectively terminated with the purchase of certain assets of Advent Europe on May 3, 2004. Through this date, no additional consideration had been earned or
paid.



The acquisition has been accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired on the basis of their respective fair values on the acquisition date. The amounts
allocated to identifiable intangibles were determined based upon managements estimates using established valuation techniques. The acquisition includes distribution rights in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The results of
operations of Advent Netherlands BV were included in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date. Advent has not presented the pro forma results of operations of Advent Netherlands BV as the results are not
material to Advents results of operations. The allocation of the Advent Netherlands BV purchase price was as follows (in thousands, except estimated remaining useful life):



|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------ | -
|                         |  | Estimated RemainingUseful Life(Years) |  | Purchase PriceAllocation |       
|Goodwill                 |  |                                       |  | $                        | 8,908  |  
|Customer relationships   |  | 5                                     |  |                          | 347    |  
|Sub-licensing agreement  |  | 5                                     |  |                          | 1,875  |  
|Non-compete agreements   |  | 1                                     |  |                          | 70     |  
|Tangible assets          |  |                                       |  |                          | 1,809  |  
|Current liabilities      |  |                                       |  |                          | (2,600 | )
|Deferred tax liabilities |  |                                       |  |                          | (800   | )
|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  
|Total purchase price     |  |                                       |  | $                        | 9,609  |  
|                         |  |                                       |  |                          |        |  



Note 13Commitments and
Contingencies



Advent leases office space and equipment
under non-cancelable operating lease agreements, which expire at various dates through May 2012. As of June 30, 2004, Advents remaining operating lease commitments through 2012 are approximately $41.9 million. Future minimum rental income to
be received under non-cancelable sub-leases total $0.9 million.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

Advent has contingent liabilities related to acquisitions of the remaining independent distributor
businesses of Advent Europe in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, and Advent Outsource Data Management in the form of potential earn-out distributions. These earn-outs will be recorded as additional goodwill, if earned.



Under the terms of the purchase agreement with Advent Europe, an earn-out
distribution of $3.6 million is due upon achievement of certain revenue goals in 2004. As of June 30, 2004, $1.8 million has been earned and recorded as additional goodwill and will be paid in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Additional amounts, if
earned, will be paid in the first quarter of 2005.



Under the
terms of the purchase agreement of Advent Outsource Data Management, there is an earn-out provision of up to $5.0 million under a formula based on revenue results through December 31, 2004. Through June 30, 2004, $1.8 million has been earned and
recorded as additional goodwill under this provision, of which approximately $1.0 million was paid in the second quarter of 2004 and the remaining $0.8 million will be paid in the third quarter of 2004. Additional consideration, if earned under this
earn-out provision, will be paid in the fourth quarter of 2004 or first quarter of 2005.



From time to time, Advent is subject to various other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The ultimate costs to resolve these matters is not expected to have a material
adverse effect on the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.



Note 14Segment and Geographic Information



SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, established standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires
selected information about operating segments in interim reports. It also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.



Advents chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.
Advent operates under a single reportable segment consisting of the development, marketing and sale of stand-alone and client/server software products, data interfaces and related maintenance and services that automate, integrate and support certain
mission critical functions of investment management organizations.



Geographical information as of and for the periods presented is as follows (in thousands):



|                            |  |                       |        |                 |   |       
|--------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ------ | --------------- | - | ------
|                            |  | (Restated,See Note 2) |        |                
|                            |  | June 30 2004          |        | December 312003
|Long-lived tangible assets: |  |                       |        |                 |   |       
|United States               |  | $                     | 32,427 |                 | $ | 38,538
|Foreign                     |  |                       | 420    |                 |   | 281   
|                            |  |                       |        |                 |   |       
|Total                       |  | $                     | 32,847 |                 | $ | 38,819
|                            |  |                       |        |                 |   |       



|                      |  |                           |        |                         |   |                       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | ----------------------- | - | --------------------- |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                      |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        | Six Months EndedJune 30
|                      |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |                         |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |  |     
|                      |  | 2004                      |        | 2003                    |   | 2004                  |  | 2003
|Geographic net sales: |  |                           |        |                         |   |                       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|United States         |  | $                         | 33,925 |                         | $ | 31,087                |  | $    | 68,098 |  | $ | 63,362
|Foreign               |  |                           | 2,099  |                         |   | 1,671                 |  |      | 3,648  |  |   | 2,440 
|                      |  |                           |        |                         |   |                       |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Total                 |  | $                         | 36,024 |                         | $ | 32,758                |  | $    | 71,746 |  | $ | 65,802
|                      |  |                           |        |                         |   |                       |  |      |        |  |   |       



No one customer
accounted for more than 10% of net revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Note 15Related Party Transactions



Stephanie DiMarco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is a director of LatentZero. When purchasing certain Advent
products, customers have the option to purchase LatentZero products to provide additional functionality. Based on sales of the LatentZero products by the Company, Advent pays a royalty fee to LatentZero. Advent has made royalty payments of $324,000
and $88,000 to LatentZero during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. No amounts were owed to LatentZero as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.



During fiscal 2004, Advent entered into a sub-lease agreement with LatentZero on one of Advents facilities in New
York, New York. Sub-lease income from LatentZero was $34,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Accounts receivable from LatentZero was $8,000 as of June 30, 2004.



Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. The following discussion
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, including, but not limited to, statements referencing our expectations
relating to future revenues and expenses. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as may, will, should, expect, plan anticipate,
believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue or other similar terms and the negative of such terms and include statements about our products and expected financial performance.Such forward-looking statements are based on our current plans and expectations and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause our actual results or performance to be materially different from any results or performance
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the Risk Factors set forth below as well as other risks identified from time to time in other SEC reports. You should not place undue
reliance on our forward-looking statements, as they are not guarantees of future results, levels of activity or performance and represent our expectations only as of the date they are made.



Unless expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, the terms
we, our, us and Advent refer to Advent Software, Inc. and its subsidiaries.



Restatement of Financial Statements



In connection with our preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, management of the Company
determined that the previously issued financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004
and September 30, 2004 should be restated to correct errors in those financial statements. The decision to restate these financial statements was made after managements discovery of the following errors:



| |  |  | Included in our income taxes payable balance at December 31, 2003 was a tax contingency reserve of $5.8 million. This reserve had been specifically established for certain tax
deductions that were included in the deferred tax asset balance at that date. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. The establishment of this full valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets is described in Note 7, Income Taxes, to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003. We believe that the tax contingency
reserve, which was established for the probable disallowance of certain tax deductions, should have been classified as a reduction of the related deferred tax assets and not as a separate liability at December 31, 2003. As a result, the valuation
allowance that was recorded in that year should be reduced by $5.8 million;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Estimated state income tax liabilities of $1.2 million had not been accrued in the year ended December 31, 2003. This error was not detected in the review process for our tax
provision;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we vacated a facility in San Francisco, California and should have recognized additional non-cash restructuring charges related to abandoned
property and equipment. As a result, we recognized additional non-cash impairment charges of $0.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 to reduce impaired property and equipment assets, and reduced depreciation expense of $36,000 and $35,000
for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Effective January 1, 2004, we corrected the classification of revenue from our subsidiary, Second Street Securities, when they enter into soft dollar arrangements for third party
products or services. Under such arrangements, Second Street Securities returns a portion of its commission revenues received from its customers in the form of third party products or services. As a result, revenues and cost of revenues for the
three quarterly periods ending March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004 have been restated to reflect revenue recognition on a net basis from these transactions as we are not the primary obligor. This change does not affect gross margin, operating
loss, or net loss for any periods presented.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



17



---

##### Table of Contents

We have not changed revenues and cost of revenues in periods prior to fiscal 2004 as the amounts were not
material.



These corrections had no significant impact on the
Companys financial statements in periods prior to the quarter ended December 31, 2003.



See Note 2, Restatement of Financial Statements, of this Report for a summary of the effect of these changes on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, as well
as our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The accompanying Managements Discussion and
Analysis gives effect to these corrections.



Overview and Strategy



Advent was founded and incorporated in 1983 in California
and reincorporated in Delaware in November 1995. We offer integrated software solutions for automating and integrating data and work flows across the investment management organization, as well as the information flows between the investment
management organization and external parties. Our products are intended to increase operational efficiency, improve the accuracy of client information and enable better decision-making. Each solution focuses on specific mission-critical functions of
the investment management organization and is tailored to meet the needs of the particular client, as determined by size, assets under management and complexity of the investment environment.



We also have a wholly-owned subsidiary, Second Street Securities, which is an
SEC-registered broker/dealer that provides independent research and brokerage services to institutional investors and registered investment advisors on a fully-disclosed basis. Second Street Securities offers our customers the ability to pay for
Advent products and services through brokerage commissions and to soft dollar third-party products and services.



During the second quarter of 2004, we continued to focus on growing and strengthening our core business and related services. Approximately two-thirds of
our quarterly license revenue came from existing clients. Our software revenues came from activity in our core products: Axys, Moxy, Partner and Geneva. Our growth in software license revenues primarily came from sales of these core products in
small and mid-sized asset managers.



We have also focused on
bringing enhanced functionality to the market. In the second quarter of 2004, we released a new product which is geared toward separately managed account managers. Separately managed accounts, or SMAs, are customized portfolios of stocks and
bonds managed professionally, where investors have greater control over the securities in their accounts than in traditional mutual funds. Our new product, Open SMA Manager, works with our Moxy product to streamline trade processing and consolidate
order creation for easier execution with trading partners.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

We have also been aligning our cost structure so that it is more in line with current revenue levels. Our
total cost of revenues and operating expenses of $82.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004 are down from $91.5 million in the same period last year. The current cost structure reflects the restructuring activities from the prior year and
continued cost-cutting initiatives.



In the second quarter of
2004, we purchased the remaining independent distributor businesses of Advent Europe Holding BV (Advent Europe) in the United Kingdom and Switzerland as well as certain assets of Advent Europe. We now control all of our European
operations. Over the last nine months, we have added significant customers in the European and Middle East regions and view this as an increasingly important market for us in the future. Our challenge will be to successfully integrate the new
European entities and continue growth in those markets.



Going
forward, our goal is to return to profitability. Our ability to achieve this target will depend upon our ability to license software and sell services to new and existing customers, to successfully develop new products and to renew maintenance
contracts at similar levels to what we achieved during the first half of 2004. While recent experience indicates that our customers and prospects are willing to make capital investments, there is still uncertainty as to our ability to achieve the
amount of revenue growth required for profitability. Our cost structure, excluding the impact of our acquisitions of the remaining distributor businesses of Advent Europe in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, must remain relatively flat with
current levels of expenditure or decrease in order to reach profitability.



It is also our intent to increase the proportion of license revenues from term licenses. While revenue from term licenses has not been material to date as a proportion of total license revenue, we expect this
proportion to increase in future periods, which would result in a greater portion of license revenue being deferred and could therefore impact the level and timing of our profitability.



In addition, worldwide demand for large investment management software systems has decreased over the past several years.
The global economic slowdown has resulted in many organizations reducing their information technology budgets and related expenditures on software and related services. This has not only limited sales of licenses to new and existing customers but
has also resulted in longer customer evaluation and decision-making processes and deferral or delay of information technology projects.



We believe these macroeconomic trends have hindered the growth of our revenues. Despite these trends, our restructuring activities over the past year and
our management of operating expenses have allowed us to decrease our net loss. We continue to focus on aggressively managing costs and are achieving positive cash flow from operations while investing in areas we deem appropriate, such as the recent
expansion of our European operations.



Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates



Our discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and
judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, valuation of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.



We believe our most
critical accounting policies and estimates include the following:



| |  |  | revenue recognition;
| | - |  | --------------------



| |  |  | income taxes;
| | - |  | -------------



| |  |  | impairment of long-lived assets; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | restructuring charges and related accruals.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



Revenue recognition. We recognize revenue from software licenses, development fees, maintenance, other recurring revenues, professional services
and other revenues. In addition, we earn commissions from customers who use our broker/dealer, Second Street Securities, to soft dollar the purchase of non-Advent products and services. Soft dollaring enables the customers to
use the commissions earned on trades to pay all or part of the fees owed to us for non-Advent products or services, which are initially paid for by Second Street Securities. The commission revenues earned from soft dollaring non-Advent
products or services are recorded as other revenues in professional services and other revenues on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.



We offer a wide variety of products and services to a large number of financially sophisticated customers. While many of our lower-priced license
transactions, maintenance contracts, subscription-based transactions and professional services projects conform to a standard structure, many of our larger transactions are complex and may require significant review and judgment in our application
of generally accepted accounting principles.



Software
license and development fees. We recognize revenue from the licensing of software when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is
reasonably assured. We generally use a signed license agreement as evidence of an arrangement. Sales through our distributors are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship together with binding



19



---

##### Table of Contents

order forms and signed contracts from the distributors customers. Revenue is recognized upon shipment to the
distributors customer and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Delivery occurs when product is delivered to a common carrier F.O.B shipping point. While many of our arrangements generally do not include acceptance
provisions, certain complex deals may involve acceptance criteria. If acceptance provisions are provided, delivery is deemed to occur upon acceptance. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the
transaction. We assess whether the collectibility of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured based on a number of factors, including the credit worthiness of the customer determined through review of credit reports, our transaction history
with the customer, other available information and pertinent country risk if the customer is located outside the United States. Our standard payment terms are due on receipt; however, terms may vary based on the country in which the
agreement is executed. Software licenses are sold with maintenance and, frequently, professional services. We allocate revenue to delivered components, normally the license component of the arrangement, using the residual method, based on vendor
specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair value of the undelivered elements (generally the maintenance and professional services components), which is specific to us. We determine the fair value of the undelivered elements based on the
historical evidence of the Companys stand-alone sales of these elements to third parties. When VSOE does not exist for undelivered elements, then the entire arrangement fee is deferred until delivery of the element. We offer term licenses as
an alternative to perpetual licenses and generally recognize revenue for term licenses ratably over the period of the contract term. We have begun a transition from selling mostly perpetual licenses to selling a mix of term and perpetual contracts,
and we expect term license revenue to increase as a proportion of total license revenue in the future.



Development fees are derived from contracts that we have entered into with other companies, including customers and development partners. Agreements for
which we receive development fees generally provide for the development of technologies and products that are expected to become part of our general product offerings in the future. Revenues for license development projects are recognized primarily
using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, based on costs incurred to date compared with the estimated cost of completion, or using the completed contract method, when the development project is finished.



If a customer buys our software and chooses to enter into a soft
dollar arrangement through our in-house broker/dealer subsidiary, Second Street Securities, the soft dollar arrangement does not change or modify the original fixed or determinable fee in the written contract. The customer is
required to pay the original fee for our software within one year. If insufficient trading volume is generated to pay the entire original fee within one year, the customer is still required to render payment within one year. If the customer chooses
to use a third-party broker/dealer, the original payment terms apply, regardless of the arrangement with the third-party broker/dealer. The option to soft dollar a transaction does not alter the underlying revenue recognition for the
transaction; all the revenue recognition criteria listed in the Software license section above must be assessed in determining how the revenue will be recognized.



Our standard practice is to enforce our contract terms and not allow our customers to return software. We have, however,
allowed customers to return software on a limited case-by-case basis and have recorded sales returns reserves as offsets to revenue in the period the sales return becomes probable, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 48, Revenue Recognition
when Right of Return Exists. The estimates for returns are adjusted periodically based upon historical rates of returns and other related factors.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

We do have three situations where we provide a contractual limited right of return to end-user customers
only: in shrink-wrap license agreements for Advent products, our MicroEdge product and our NPO product. The shrink-wrap license agreement for Advent products provides for a right of return within seven days of delivery of the software. The MicroEdge
software license agreement allows for a thirty-day money back guarantee. The NPO license agreement allows for a seven-day right of return. We recognize revenue on delivery since the fee is fixed or determinable, the buyer is obligated to pay, the
risk of loss passes to the customer, and we have the ability to estimate returns. Our ability to estimate returns is based on a long history of experience with relatively homogenous transactions and the fact that the return period is short. We have
recorded a sales returns reserve (contra revenue account) to account for these situations based on our historical experience.



Maintenance and other recurring revenues. We offer annual maintenance programs that provide for technical support and updates to our software
products. Maintenance fees are bundled in the initial licensing year and charged separately for renewals of annual maintenance in subsequent years. We offer other recurring revenue services that are either subscription-based or transaction-based,
and primarily include the provision of software interfaces to, and the capability to download securities information from, third party data providers. Fair value for maintenance is based upon renewal rates stated in the contracts or, in limited
cases, separate sales of renewals to other customers. We recognize revenue for maintenance ratably over the contract term. We recognize revenue from recurring revenue transactions either ratably over the subscription period or as the transactions
occur.



Subscription-based revenues and any related set-up fees
are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.



Professional services and other revenues. We offer a variety of professional services that include project management, implementation, data conversion, integration, custom report writing and training. Fair value for professional
services is based upon separate sales of these services by us to other customers. Our professional services are generally billed based on hourly rates together with reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses. Our professional services and
other revenue also include revenue from our annual user conferences. We generally recognize revenue as these professional services are performed. Certain professional services arrangements involve acceptance criteria. In these cases, revenue and
related expenses are recognized upon acceptance.



Effective
January 1, 2004, commission revenues received from soft dollar transactions for products and services not related to Advent products and services are recorded as other revenues on a net basis as we are not the primary obligor in these
transactions. Revenues for these soft dollar transactions are recognized on a trade-date basis as securities transactions occur.



Income taxes. We account for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that requires the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities be recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Generally accepted accounting principles require us to evaluate whether or not we will realize a benefit from net deferred tax
assets on an ongoing basis. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the net deferred tax assets to an amount that will more likely than not be realized. Significant factors considered by management in assessing the need for a valuation allowance
include the following:



| |  |  | our historical operating results;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | the length of time over which the differences will be realized;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | tax planning opportunities; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------



| |  |  | expectations for future earnings.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



In considering whether or not we will realize a benefit from net deferred tax assets, recent losses must be given substantially more weight than any
projections of future profitability. In 2003, we determined that, under applicable accounting principles, based on our history of consecutive losses since the second quarter of 2002, it was more likely than not that we would not realize any value
for our net deferred tax assets. Accordingly, we established a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the amount of these assets. Income tax expense recorded in the future will be reduced to the extent sufficient positive evidence materializes to
support a reversal of, or decrease in, the valuation allowance.



Impairment of long-lived assets. We review our goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year and more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss has occurred. We are
required to test our goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. We have determined that we have only one reporting unit. The test for goodwill impairment is a two-step process:



The first step compares the fair value of our reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value
of our reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of our reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary.



The second step, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of our reporting unit
goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of our reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.



During the fourth quarter of 2003, we completed our annual impairment test
which indicated there was no impairment. There were no events or changes in circumstances during the first and second quarters of 2004 which triggered an impairment review.



We review our other long-lived assets including property and equipment and other intangibles for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:



| |  |  | significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | significant negative market or economic trends;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our market capitalization relative to net book value.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------





21



---

##### Table of Contents

Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the assets carrying amount to their expected future
undiscounted net cash flows. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.



For the second quarter of 2004, we recorded non-cash property and equipment
impairment charges of approximately $0.9 million as part of our restructuring activities related to vacating a facility in San Francisco, California.



We hold minority interests in several privately held companies having operations or technology in areas within our strategic focus. Most of these
investments can be considered as early stage investment opportunities and are classified as other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. One of these investments is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We record an
investment write-down when we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an
inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investments current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. We estimate an investments carrying value based
primarily on its revenue and implied valuation based on revenue multiples for similar public companies, supplemented by any recent valuation events, such as an equity financing.



Restructuring charges and related accruals. Beginning in 2003, we developed and implemented formalized plans for
restructuring our business to better align our resources to market conditions and recorded significant charges. In connection with these plans, we recorded estimated expenses for severance and benefits, lease cancellations, asset write-offs and
other restructuring costs. Given the significance of, and the timing of the execution of such activities, this process is complex and involves periodic reassessments of estimates made at the time the original decisions were made, including
evaluating real estate market conditions for expected vacancy periods and sub-lease rents. We continually evaluate the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under our restructuring initiatives. Although we believe that these estimates accurately
reflect the costs of our restructuring plans, actual results may differ, thereby requiring us to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, which was amended by FIN 46R in December 2003. FIN 46 expands upon and strengthens existing accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and
activities of another entity. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for business purposes in which either (a) the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest or (b) the equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 requires a variable interest
entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entitys activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns or both (primary
beneficiary).



We adopted the provisions of FIN 46 in the first
quarter of 2004. In conjunction with the adoption of FIN 46, we determined that our independent European distributor, Advent Europe, was a variable interest entity, but that we were not the primary beneficiary. In accordance with FIN 46, we were not
required to consolidate this distributor. On May 3, 2004, we purchased the remaining independent distributor businesses of Advent Europe in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, as well as certain assets of Advent Europe, for initial consideration of
$5.8 million and additional potential consideration of approximately $3.6 million, of which $1.8 million was earned and recorded as additional goodwill during the second quarter of 2004. We have no other exposure to loss as we do not have any
involvement anymore with Advent Europe.



In December 2003, the
SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition, which supercedes Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. The
primary purpose of SAB 104 is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, which was superceded as a result of the issuance of Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21),
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. SAB 104 also incorporated certain sections of the SECs Revenue Recognition in Financial StatementsFrequently Asked Questions and Answers document.
While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Reclassifications



Certain prior period
amounts, as detailed below, have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation to better reflect our view of the current business. These reclassifications do not affect total net revenues, net loss, cash flows, or
stockholders equity.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Amortization of Developed Technology. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we began presenting
amortization of developed technology within cost of revenues. Through our various acquisitions, we have purchased technologies which are either licensed directly to our customers or used internally to provide services to our customers for which we
derive revenue. As a result of our acquisitions from 2001 through the middle of 2004, the amortization related to purchased technology has increased. We believe that presenting this amortization within cost of revenues more accurately presents our
total cost of revenues and gross margin. We have reclassified approximately $1.4 million and $2.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, which was previously included in amortization of other intangibles within operating
expenses, to amortization of developed technology within cost of revenues.



Accounts Receivable and Deferred Revenues. In the first quarter of 2004, we discontinued netting down specific revenue reserves which were included in deferred revenues against their corresponding receivables.
We have determined that for presentation purposes, the discontinuation of the net-down for the reserves gives more visibility to our receivables and deferred revenue accounts. We have reclassified $1.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2003
resulting in corresponding increases in both accounts receivable and deferred revenues.



In addition to the reclassifications described above, corresponding reclassifications were also made on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows.



In addition to discontinuing the specific reserve net down noted above in the
first quarter of 2004, we also changed our methodology for recording accounts receivable and deferred revenues in the second quarter of 2004. In prior periods, we netted down any amounts in deferred revenues that were still outstanding as a
receivable. Beginning on April 1, 2004, accounts receivable and deferred revenues are presented gross instead of net, as no offset entry is made. This has the effect of increasing accounts receivable and deferred revenues are presented by equal
amounts. There is no impact on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.



Supplemental comparative disclosures, as if the change had been retroactively applied are presented below (in thousands):



|                         |  |                  |       
|------------------------ |  | ---------------- | ------
|                         |  | December 31 2003
|Accounts receivable, net |  | $                | 32,752
|                         |  |                  |       
|Deferred revenues        |  | $                | 51,427
|                         |  |                  |       



Accrued
Restructuring.Certain restructuring liabilities have been reclassified from short-term to long-term. We have historically classified all amounts accrued for restructuring expense as accrued liabilities on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Based upon our re-evaluation of these liabilities, we have reclassified restructuring liabilities that are to be paid more than a year after the balance sheet date to other long-term liabilities on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. These reclassifications had no impact on our results of operations or cash flows. The following is a summary of the effect of these reclassifications on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003
and June 30, 2004 (in thousands):



|                            |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ------ | -------------- |  | - | ------
|                            |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|                            |  | As PreviouslyReported                 |        | Reclassifications |   |        | AsReclassified
|December 31, 2003           |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|Accrued liabilities         |  | $                                     | 17,245 |                   | $ | (1,144 | )              |  | $ | 16,101
|Other long-term liabilities |  | $                                     | 2,338  |                   | $ | 1,144  |                |  | $ | 3,482 
|                            |  |                                       |       
|June 30, 2004               |  |                                       |        |                   |   |        |                |  |   |       
|Accrued liabilities         |  | $                                     | 22,334 |                   | $ | (4,124 | )              |  | $ | 18,210
|Other long-term liabilities |  | $                                     | 2,253  |                   | $ | 4,124  |                |  | $ | 6,377 



Auction Rate
Securities. Certain auction rate securities have been reclassified from cash equivalents to short-term marketable securities. Auction rate securities are variable rate bonds tied to short term interest rates with maturities on the face of the
securities in excess of 90 days. Auction rate securities have interest rate resets through a modified Dutch auction, at predetermined short term intervals, usually 7, 28 or 35 days. They trade at par and are callable at par on any interest payment
date at the option of the issuer. Interest paid during a given period is based upon the interest rate determined during the prior auction.



Although these securities are issued and rated as long term bonds, they are priced and traded as short term instruments because of their liquidity
provided through the interest rate reset. We had historically classified these instruments as cash equivalents if the period between interest rate resets was 90 days or less, which was based on our ability to either liquidate our holding or roll our
investment over to the next reset period.



Based upon our
re-evaluation of the maturity dates associated with the underlying bonds, we have reclassified our auction rate securities, previously classified as cash equivalents, as short-term marketable securities in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004. In addition, Purchases of marketable securities and Sales and maturities of marketable securities, included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows, have been revised to reflect the purchase and sale of auction rate securities during the periods presented. As of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Company held approximately $48.6 million and $74.3 million of these auction rate
securities, which were reclassified. These reclassifications had no impact on the results of operations of the Company. The following is a summary of the effect of these reclassifications on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets
as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, as well as the effect of these changes on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 (in thousands):



|                                                     |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | ------- | -------------- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                     |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets           |        
|                                                     |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |         |   | Reclassifications |   |         | AsReclassified | 
|December 31, 2003                                    |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                            |  | $                                               | 83,334  |   |                   | $ | (48,573 | )              |  | $ | 34,761  |  
|Marketable securities                                |  | $                                               | 76,738  |   |                   | $ | 48,573  |                |  | $ | 125,311 |  
|                                                     |  |                                                 |        
|June 30, 2004                                        |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                            |  | $                                               | 109,847 |   |                   | $ | (74,285 | )              |  | $ | 35,562  |  
|Marketable securities                                |  | $                                               | 57,063  |   |                   | $ | 74,285  |                |  | $ | 131,348 |  
|                                                     | 
|                                                     |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |        
|                                                     |  | As PreviouslyReported                           |         |   | Reclassifications |   |         | AsReclassified | 
|Six months ended June 30, 2003                       |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Purchases of marketable securities                   |  | $                                               | (95,091 | ) |                   | $ | (2,999  | )              |  | $ | (98,090 | )
|Sales and maturities of marketable securities        |  | $                                               | 110,195 |   |                   | $ | 3,442   |                |  | $ | 113,637 |  
|Net cash provided by investing activities            |  | $                                               | 1,145   |   |                   | $ | 443     |                |  | $ | 1,588   |  
|Net change in cash and cash equivalents              |  | $                                               | (5,375  | ) |                   | $ | 443     |                |  | $ | (4,932  | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |  | $                                               | 78,906  |   |                   | $ | (48,925 | )              |  | $ | 29,981  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period       |  | $                                               | 73,531  |   |                   | $ | (48,482 | )              |  | $ | 25,049  |  
|                                                     |  |                                                 |        
|Six months ended June 30, 2004                       |  |                                                 |         |   |                   |   |         |                |  |   |         |  
|Purchases of marketable securities                   |  | $                                               | (45,014 | ) |                   | $ | (28,491 | )              |  | $ | (73,505 | )
|Sales and maturities of marketable securities        |  | $                                               | 62,719  |   |                   | $ | 2,779   |                |  | $ | 65,498  |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  |  | $                                               | 10,684  |   |                   | $ | (25,712 | )              |  | $ | (15,028 | )
|Net change in cash and cash equivalents              |  | $                                               | 26,513  |   |                   | $ | (25,712 | )              |  | $ | 801     |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |  | $                                               | 83,334  |   |                   | $ | (48,573 | )              |  | $ | 34,761  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period       |  | $                                               | 109,847 |   |                   | $ | (74,285 | )              |  | $ | 35,562  |  



23



---

##### Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 AND 2003



The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain financial
information as a percentage of total net revenues:



|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | -- |  | ----------------------- | -- |  | --------------------- | -- |  | ---- | --
|                                       |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |    |  | Six Months EndedJune 30 |   
|                                       |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |    |  |                         |    |  | (Restated,See Note 2) |    |  |      |   
|                                       |  | 2004                      |    |  | 2003                    |    |  | 2004                  |    |  | 2003 |   
|Net revenues:                          |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|License and development fees           |  | 24                        | %  |  | 20                      | %  |  | 23                    | %  |  | 20   | % 
|Maintenance and other recurring        |  | 65                        |    |  | 64                      |    |  | 65                    |    |  | 64   |   
|Professional services and other        |  | 11                        |    |  | 16                      |    |  | 12                    |    |  | 16   |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Total net revenues                     |  | 100                       |    |  | 100                     |    |  | 100                   |    |  | 100  |   
|                                       |  |                           |    | 
|Cost of revenues:                      |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|License and development fees           |  | 1                         |    |  | 2                       |    |  | 1                     |    |  | 2    |   
|Maintenance and other recurring        |  | 20                        |    |  | 24                      |    |  | 20                    |    |  | 23   |   
|Professional services and other        |  | 12                        |    |  | 15                      |    |  | 11                    |    |  | 13   |   
|Amortization of developed technology   |  | 4                         |    |  | 4                       |    |  | 4                     |    |  | 4    |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Total cost of revenues                 |  | 37                        |    |  | 45                      |    |  | 36                    |    |  | 42   |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Gross margin                           |  | 63                        |    |  | 55                      |    |  | 64                    |    |  | 58   |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Operating expenses:                    |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Sales and marketing                    |  | 26                        |    |  | 34                      |    |  | 25                    |    |  | 35   |   
|Product development                    |  | 23                        |    |  | 30                      |    |  | 23                    |    |  | 29   |   
|General and administrative             |  | 17                        |    |  | 20                      |    |  | 17                    |    |  | 18   |   
|Amortization of other intangibles      |  | 6                         |    |  | 6                       |    |  | 6                     |    |  | 6    |   
|Restructuring charges                  |  | 16                        |    |  | 8                       |    |  | 8                     |    |  | 9    |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Total operating expenses               |  | 88                        |    |  | 98                      |    |  | 79                    |    |  | 97   |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Loss from operations                   |  | (25                       | )  |  | (43                     | )  |  | (15                   | )  |  | (39  | ) 
|Interest income and other expense, net |  | (1                        | )  |  | 0                       |    |  | 0                     |    |  | 0    |   
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Loss before income taxes               |  | (26                       | )  |  | (43                     | )  |  | (15                   | )  |  | (39  | ) 
|Benefit from income taxes              |  | 0                         |    |  | (14                     | )  |  | 0                     |    |  | (13  | ) 
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   
|Net loss                               |  | (26                       | )% |  | (29                     | )% |  | (15                   | )% |  | (26  | )%
|                                       |  |                           |    |  |                         |    |  |                       |    |  |      |   



NET REVENUES



|                                  |  |                           |        |      |   |                         |  |                       |       |      |   |        |  |   |        |  |   |      
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ----------------------- |  | --------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------ |  | - | -----
|                                  |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |      |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |                      
|                                  |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |      |   |                         |  | (Restated,See Note 2) |       |      |   |       
|                                  |  | 2004                      |        | 2003 |   | Change                  |  | 2004                  |       | 2003 |   | Change
|Total net revenues (in thousands) |  | $                         | 36,024 |      | $ | 32,758                  |  | $                     | 3,266 |      | $ | 71,746 |  | $ | 65,802 |  | $ | 5,944



Our net revenues are
made up of three components: license and development fees; maintenance and other recurring; and professional services and other. License revenues are derived from the licensing of software products, while development fees are derived from
development contracts that we have entered into with other companies, including customers and development partners. Maintenance and other recurring revenues are derived from maintenance fees charged in the initial licensing year, renewals of annual
maintenance services in subsequent years and recurring revenues derived from our subscription-based and transaction-based services. Professional services and other revenues include fees for consulting, training services, soft dollaring
of third-party products and services and our user conferences.



Each of the major revenue categories has historically varied as a percentage of net revenues and we expect this variability to continue in future periods. This variability is partially due to the timing of the introduction of new products,
the relative size and timing of individual software licenses, as well as the size of the implementation, the resulting proportion of the maintenance and professional services components of these license transactions and the amount of client use of
pricing and related data. We expect total net revenues to be in the range of $36 million to $38 million in the third quarter of 2004.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

License Revenue and Development Fees



|                                            |  |                           |       |   |      |   |                         |        |  |      |       |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | ----- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | -----
|                                            |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |        |  |     
|                                            |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |                         | Change |  | 2004 |       |  | 2003 |        |   | Change
|License and development fees (in thousands) |  | $                         | 8,719 |   |      | $ | 6,470                   |        |  | $    | 2,249 |  | $    | 16,727 |   |        | $ | 13,212 |   |  | $ | 3,515
|Percent of total net revenues               |  |                           | 24    | % |      |   | 20                      | %      |  |      |       |  |      | 23     | % |        |   | 20     | % |  |   |      



The increase in
license revenue and development fees in the three and six month periods reflected an improved overall economic outlook and improved conditions within the financial services industry, which contributed to increases in capital expenditures by our
customers. In addition, our focus on selling our core products resulted in higher sales, particularly in our Advent Office products. We also recognized approximately $800,000 in the second quarter of 2004 from a reduction in deferred license
revenues. We do not expect a significant change in deferred revenue in the third quarter of 2004.



Revenues from Axys, Moxy and Partner comprised more than half of license sales in the second quarter of 2004. Axys, Moxy and Qube revenues increased
substantially in both the three and six month periods. Revenues from Geneva products increased in the second quarter of 2004 compared with the second quarter of 2003, but were relatively flat for the six month periods. The volume of larger license
contracts recognized during the three and six month periods also increased.



We typically license our products on a per server, per user basis with the price per customer varying based on the selection of the products licensed, the number of site installations and the number of authorized
users. We earn development fees when we provide product solutions, which are not part of our standard product offering. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, revenue from development fees was less than 10% of total license and
development fees revenue.For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, soft dollar revenues generated from Advent related licenses paid for through soft dollar transactions represented less than 5% of total license and
development revenues.



We expect license and development fee
revenue to be relatively flat in the third quarter of 2004 with modest growth year over year.



Maintenance and Other Recurring Revenues



|                                                        |  |                           |        |   |      |   |                         |        |  |      |       |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | ----- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | -----
|                                                        |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |   |      |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |        |  |     
|                                                        |  | 2004                      |        |   | 2003 |   |                         | Change |  | 2004 |       |  | 2003 |        |   | Change
|Maintenance and other recurring revenues (in thousands) |  | $                         | 23,314 |   |      | $ | 21,154                  |        |  | $    | 2,160 |  | $    | 46,200 |   |        | $ | 42,294 |   |  | $ | 3,906
|Percent of total net revenues                           |  |                           | 65     | % |      |   | 64                      | %      |  |      |       |  |      | 65     | % |        |   | 64     | % |  |   |      



The increase in
maintenance and other recurring revenues in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 reflected an increase in new maintenance support contracts as a result of an increase in the number of new license deals, continuing maintenance revenues from
our established customer base, an increase in wealth subscription services and an increase in commissions generated by a partner program. The maintenance renewal rate was within the 82% to 88% range that we have experienced over the past year.



Maintenance revenue has remained relatively flat as a
proportion of total maintenance and recurring revenues at approximately 68% to 69% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. We expect maintenance and recurring revenues will increase slightly in the third quarter of 2004,
reflecting additions to the customer base.



Professional Services and Other
Revenues



|                                                        |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |                       |   |  |      |       |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | --------------------- | - |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                        |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |                       |  
|                                                        |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |   |  |      |       |   |        |  
|                                                        |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004                  |   |  | 2003 |       |   | Change |  
|Professional services and other revenues (in thousands) |  | $                         | 3,991 |   |      | $ | 5,134 |                         |  | $ | (1,143                | ) |  | $    | 8,819 |   |        | $ | 10,296 |   |  | $ | (1,477 | )
|Percent of total net revenues                           |  |                           | 11    | % |      |   | 16    | %                       |  |   |                       |   |  |      | 12    | % |        |   | 16     | % |  |   |        |  



Professional services
and other revenues include consulting, project management, custom integration, custom work, training and soft dollar transactions for products and services not related to Advent products and services. Professional services related to Advent Office
products generally can be completed and accepted in a relatively short time period while services related to Geneva products may require a six to nine month implementation period. Therefore, the revenues associated with professional services reflect
a mix of services related to current quarter license revenue as well as transactions from prior quarters. Generally, our consulting revenues lag our license revenues by one or two quarters, but can also be affected by specific project milestone
completions.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

The decreases in professional services and other revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004
were primarily due to lower revenues earned from third party products paid for through soft dollar transactions. The decline in revenues from soft dollar transactions resulted from our change in revenue classification from our Second Street
Securities subsidiary when they engage in the soft dollaring of third party products. Other revenues and cost of revenues for fiscal 2004 have been changed to reflect revenue recognition on a net basis from these transactions. This change impacted
professional services and other revenues by a total of $1.0 million and $2.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. Additionally, the decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2004 was partially offset by
revenue recognized from milestone completions during the first quarter of 2004 with two significant customers and increased implementation services related to our Geneva product during this same period. We expect that revenues from professional
services will increase slightly in the third quarter of 2004 due to the recognition of a milestone payment from a large implementation.



COST OF REVENUES



|                                      |  |                           |        |   |      |   |        |                         |  |   |                       |   |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | ----------------------- |  | - | --------------------- | - |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                      |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |        |   |      |   |        | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |                       |  
|                                      |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |        |   |      |   |        |                         |  |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |   |  |      |        |   |        |  
|                                      |  | 2004                      |        |   | 2003 |   |        | Change                  |  |   | 2004                  |   |  | 2003 |        |   | Change |  
|Total cost of revenues (in thousands) |  | $                         | 13,203 |   |      | $ | 14,541 |                         |  | $ | (1,338                | ) |  | $    | 25,592 |   |        | $ | 27,716 |   |  | $ | (2,124 | )
|Percent of total net revenues         |  |                           | 37     | % |      |   | 45     | %                       |  |   |                       |   |  |      | 36     | % |        |   | 42     | % |  |   |        |  



Our cost of revenues
is made up of four components: cost of license and development fees; cost of maintenance and other recurring; cost of professional services and other; and amortization of developed technology.



Cost of License and Development Fees



|                                                    |  |                           |     |   |      |   |     |                         |  |   |      |   |  |      |       |   |        |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | --- | - | ---- | - | --- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                    |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |     |   |      |   |     | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |      |  
|                                                    |  | 2004                      |     |   | 2003 |   |     | Change                  |  |   | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |       |   | Change |  
|Cost of license and development fees (in thousands) |  | $                         | 426 |   |      | $ | 703 |                         |  | $ | (277 | ) |  | $    | 1,020 |   |        | $ | 1,257 |   |  | $ | (237 | )
|Percent of total license revenues                   |  |                           | 5   | % |      |   | 11  | %                       |  |   |      |   |  |      | 6     | % |        |   | 10    | % |  |   |      |  



Cost of license and
development fees consists primarily of royalties and other fees paid to third parties, the fixed direct labor involved in producing and distributing our software, labor costs associated with generating development fees and cost of product media
including duplication, manuals and packaging materials. The decrease in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily reflected a decrease in third party implementation fees associated with the implementation of our software to a European
client as well as a decrease in royalties paid to a third party vendor related to products sold, which included their technology. We expect cost of license and development fees to remain relatively flat in the third quarter of 2004.



Cost of Maintenance and Other Recurring



|                                                       |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |      |   |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                       |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |      |  
|                                                       |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |        |   | Change |  
|Cost of maintenance and other recurring (in thousands) |  | $                         | 7,320 |   |      | $ | 7,662 |                         |  | $ | (342 | ) |  | $    | 14,200 |   |        | $ | 15,041 |   |  | $ | (841 | )
|Percent of total maintenance revenue                   |  |                           | 31    | % |      |   | 36    | %                       |  |   |      |   |  |      | 31     | % |        |   | 36     | % |  |   |      |  



Cost of maintenance
and other recurring revenues is primarily comprised of the direct costs of providing technical support and other services for recurring revenues and royalties paid to third party subscription-based and transaction-based vendors. The decrease in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was due primarily to the reduction in personnel and related costs associated with restructuring activities implemented during 2003. The decrease was partially offset by increases in royalties related to the
increase in our data subscription revenues. We expect cost of maintenance and other recurring revenues to be relatively flat in the third quarter of 2004.



Cost of Professional Services and Other



|                                                       |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |                       |   |  |      |       |   |        |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | --------------------- | - |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                       |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |                       |  
|                                                       |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   | (Restated,See Note 2) |   |  |      |       |   |        |  
|                                                       |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004                  |   |  | 2003 |       |   | Change |  
|Cost of professional services and other (in thousands) |  | $                         | 4,107 |   |      | $ | 4,740 |                         |  | $ | (633                  | ) |  | $    | 7,680 |   |        | $ | 8,547 |   |  | $ | (867 | )
|Percent of total professional services revenues        |  |                           | 103   | % |      |   | 92    | %                       |  |   |                       |   |  |      | 87    | % |        |   | 83    | % |  |   |      |  



Cost of professional
services and other revenue consists primarily of personnel related costs associated with the client services and support organization in providing consulting, custom report writing and conversions of data from clients previous systems. Also
included are direct costs associated with third-party consultants, travel expenses and soft dollar transactions for third party products.



The decreases in cost of professional services and other for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily reflected lower cost of revenues from
third party products paid for through soft dollar transactions partially offset by an increase in employee bonus programs. The decline in cost of revenues from soft dollar transactions resulted from our change in revenue classification from our
Second Street Securities subsidiary when they engage in the soft dollaring of third party products. Other revenues and cost of revenues for fiscal 2004 have been changed to reflect revenue recognition on a net basis from these transactions. This
change impacted cost of professional services and other by a total of $1.0 million and $2.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. We expect cost of professional services and other revenues to remain relatively flat
in the third quarter of 2004.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Amortization of Developed Technology



|                                                    |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |      |   |  |      |       |   |        |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                    |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |      |  
|                                                    |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |       |   | Change |  
|Amortization of developed technology (in thousands) |  | $                         | 1,350 |   |      | $ | 1,436 |                         |  | $ | (86  | ) |  | $    | 2,692 |   |        | $ | 2,871 |   |  | $ | (179 | )
|Percent of total net revenues                       |  |                           | 4     | % |      |   | 4     | %                       |  |   |      |   |  |      | 4     | % |        |   | 4     | % |  |   |      |  



Amortization of
developed technology represents amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets. The decrease in amortization of developed technology reflected technology related intangible assets from prior acquisitions becoming fully amortized, partially
offset by amortization of technology related intangible assets associated with our acquisitions in the United Kingdom and Switzerland. We expect amortization of developed technology to be approximately $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2004.



OPERATING EXPENSES



Sales and Marketing



|                                   |  |                           |       |   |      |   |        |                         |  |   |        |   |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ------ | ----------------------- |  | - | ------ | - |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                   |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |        | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |        |  
|                                   |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |        | Change                  |  |   | 2004   |   |  | 2003 |        |   | Change |  
|Sales and marketing (in thousands) |  | $                         | 9,276 |   |      | $ | 11,263 |                         |  | $ | (1,987 | ) |  | $    | 18,069 |   |        | $ | 22,718 |   |  | $ | (4,649 | )
|Percent of total net revenues      |  |                           | 26    | % |      |   | 34     | %                       |  |   |        |   |  |      | 25     | % |        |   | 35     | % |  |   |        |  



Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of the costs of personnel involved in the sales and marketing process, sales commissions, advertising and promotional materials, sales facilities expense, trade shows, and seminars. The decrease in expense for both the
three and six month periods was primarily due to a decrease in personnel and related costs related to restructuring activities in 2003 and program marketing expenses. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase slightly in the third quarter
of 2004 as a result of incurring a full quarter of expenses from our acquisitions in the United Kingdom and Switzerland.



Product Development



|                                   |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |        |   |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | ------ | - |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                   |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |        |  
|                                   |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004   |   |  | 2003 |        |   | Change |  
|Product development (in thousands) |  | $                         | 8,501 |   |      | $ | 9,692 |                         |  | $ | (1,191 | ) |  | $    | 16,353 |   |        | $ | 19,059 |   |  | $ | (2,706 | )
|Percent of total net revenues      |  |                           | 23    | % |      |   | 30    | %                       |  |   |        |   |  |      | 23     | % |        |   | 29     | % |  |   |        |  



Product development
expenses consist primarily of salary and benefits for our development staff as well as contractors fees and other costs associated with the enhancements of existing products and services and development of new products and services. The
decrease in expenses for the three and six month periods was due to a reduction in personnel and related costs associated with restructuring activities implemented during 2003 and reductions in the utilization of outside contractors and services. We
expect product development expenses to be relatively flat in the third quarter of 2004 as we continue progress on new product introductions.



Rapid technological advances in hardware and software development, evolving standards in computer hardware and software technology, changing customer
needs and frequent new product introductions and enhancements characterize the software markets in which we compete. We plan on continuing to dedicate a significant amount of resources to research and development efforts to maintain and improve our
competitive position in these markets.



General and Administrative



|                                          |  |                           |       |   |      |   |       |                         |  |   |      |   |  |      |        |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ------ | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | ---
|                                          |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   |       | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |     
|                                          |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |       | Change                  |  |   | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |        |   | Change
|General and administrative (in thousands) |  | $                         | 6,207 |   |      | $ | 6,602 |                         |  | $ | (395 | ) |  | $    | 12,188 |   |        | $ | 11,914 |   |  | $ | 274
|Percent of total net revenues             |  |                           | 17    | % |      |   | 20    | %                       |  |   |      |   |  |      | 17     | % |        |   | 18     | % |  |   |    



General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for finance, administration, operations and general management, as well as legal and accounting expenses. The decrease in expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was due to a
$1.3 million settlement and legal expenses related to a claim brought by a former employee incurred in the second quarter of 2003, partially offset by an increase in accounting and compliance costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Act of 2002 of approximately $700,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was due to
increased accounting and compliance costs of $733,000 associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, costs of $425,000 associated with discontinuing an offsite web hosting service and costs of $318,000 for employee bonus programs, partially offset
by the litigation settlement incurred during 2003. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase slightly in the third quarter of 2004 as a result of continuing accounting and compliance costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 as well as incurring a full quarter of expenses from our acquisitions in the United Kingdom and Switzerland.



Amortization of Other Intangibles



|                                                 |  |                           |       |   |      |   |                         |        |  |      |    |  |      |       |   |        |   |       |   |  |   |    
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | -- |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---
|                                                 |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |        |  |     
|                                                 |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |                         | Change |  | 2004 |    |  | 2003 |       |   | Change
|Amortization of other intangibles (in thousands) |  | $                         | 2,060 |   |      | $ | 1,966                   |        |  | $    | 94 |  | $    | 4,084 |   |        | $ | 3,891 |   |  | $ | 193
|Percent of total net revenues                    |  |                           | 6     | % |      |   | 6                       | %      |  |      |    |  |      | 6     | % |        |   | 6     | % |  |   |    



Amortization of other
intangibles represents amortization of non-technology related intangible assets. Amortization of other intangibles increased slightly as a result of our acquisitions in the United Kingdom and Switzerland. We expect amortization of other intangibles
to be approximately $2.1 million in the third quarter of 2004.



Restructuring Charges



|                                     |  |                           |       |   |      |   |                         |        |  |                       |       |  |      |       |   |        |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----------------------- | ------ |  | --------------------- | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------ | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                     |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |       |   |      |   | Six Months EndedJune 30 |        |  |                       |      
|                                     |  | (Restated,See Note 2)     |       |   |      |   |                         |        |  | (Restated,See Note 2) |       |  |      |       |   |        |  
|                                     |  | 2004                      |       |   | 2003 |   |                         | Change |  | 2004                  |       |  | 2003 |       |   | Change |  
|Restructuring charges (in thousands) |  | $                         | 5,903 |   |      | $ | 2,671                   |        |  | $                     | 3,232 |  | $    | 5,860 |   |        | $ | 6,160 |   |  | $ | (300 | )
|Percent of total net revenues        |  |                           | 16    | % |      |   | 8                       | %      |  |                       |       |  |      | 8     | % |        |   | 9     | % |  |   |      |  



In response to the
downturn in the financial services industry, the decline in information technology spending and duplicative efforts in parts of our business as a result of our acquisitions, we implemented several phases of restructuring beginning in 2003. These
plans were implemented to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies by better aligning our resources to our near term revenue opportunities.



For the three months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded a net restructuring expense of $5.9 million primarily consisting of $4.9 million of facility exit
costs and $0.9 million of property and equipment impairment charges related to vacating a facility in San Francisco, California, $72,000 related to vacating a portion of a facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a $12,000 adjustment related to
severance for employees terminated in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. For the first quarter of 2004, we recorded a net restructuring benefit of $43,000 consisting of a $163,000 adjustment related to entering into a final sub-lease agreement on one
of the vacated facilities in New York, New York and a $16,000 adjustment to non-cash severance. These adjustments were partially offset by a restructuring charge of $136,000 related to the termination of nine employees, located in New York.



For the three months ended June 30, 2003, we recorded a
restructuring charge of $2.7 million, primarily for severance and benefits related to the termination of approximately 90 employees, from functions all across the company. For the first quarter of 2003, we recorded restructuring charges of $3.5
million or total charges of $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The restructuring charges for the first quarter of 2003 consisted of consisted of $2.1 million related to the closing and consolidating excess office space, primarily
in New York, New York and Australia; $1.0 million of severance and benefits related to the termination of 39 employees; and $410,000 related to the abandonment and write-off of certain equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements.



The following table sets forth an analysis of the components of the
restructuring charges, payments and non-cash charges made against the accrual during the six months ended June 30, 2004 (in thousands):



|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- | ---- | - | ------------------ | - | ----- | --------------------- |  | - | --------------------------- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                       |  | PropertyandEquipmentAbandoned |      |   | Facility ExitCosts |   |       | Severance andBenefits |  |   | (Restated,See Note 2) Total |  
|Balance of restructuring accrual at December 31, 2003  |  | $                             |     |   |                    | $ | 2,181 |                       |  | $ | 164                         |   |  | $ | 2,345  |  
|Restructuring charges                                  |  |                               | 863  |   |                    |   | 5,028 |                       |  |   | 136                         |   |  |   | 6,027  |  
|Reversal of deferred rent related to facilities exited |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | 272   |                       |  |   |                            |   |  |   | 272    |  
|Cash payments                                          |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | (924  | )                     |  |   | (189                        | ) |  |   | (1,113 | )
|Adjustment of prior restructuring costs                |  |                               |     |   |                    |   | (163  | )                     |  |   | (4                          | ) |  |   | (167   | )
|Non-cash charges                                       |  |                               | (863 | ) |                    |   |      |                       |  |   |                            |   |  |   | (863   | )
|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance of restructuring accrual at June 30, 2004      |  | $                             |     |   |                    | $ | 6,394 |                       |  | $ | 107                         |   |  | $ | 6,501  |  
|                                                       |  |                               |      |   |                    |   |       |                       |  |   |                             |   |  |   |        |  



Of the remaining
restructuring accrual of $6.5 million at June 30, 2004, $2.4 million and $4.1 million are included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The remaining excess
facility costs are stated at estimated fair value, net of estimated sublease income of approximately $6.3 million. We expect to pay remaining obligations in connection with vacated facilities no later than over the remaining lease terms, which
expire on various dates through 2012. We expect to pay the remaining severance and benefits in 2004.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2004, cumulative restructuring charges incurred since inception of Advents
restructuring program in 2003 were $15 million, consisting of $8.1 million, $5.1 million and $1.7 million relating to facility exit costs, severance and benefits, and property and equipment abandoned, respectively. As a result of our restructuring
activities implemented to date, we have reduced our total expenses by approximately $21 million on an annual basis.



Interest Income and Other Expense, Net



|                                       |  |                           |      |    |      |   |    |                         |  |   |      |   |  |      |     |   |        |   |     |   |  |   |      |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ---- | -- | ---- | - | -- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | --- | - | ------ | - | --- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                       |  | Three Months EndedJune 30 |      |    |      |   |    | Six Months EndedJune 30 |  |   |      |  
|                                       |  | 2004                      |      |    | 2003 |   |    | Change                  |  |   | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |     |   | Change |  
|Interest income and other expense, net |  | $                         | (142 | )  |      | $ | (3 | )                       |  | $ | (139 | ) |  | $    | (16 | ) |        | $ | 169 |   |  | $ | (185 | )
|Percent of total net revenues          |  |                           | (1   | )% |      |   | 0  | %                       |  |   |      |   |  |      | 0   | % |        |   | 0   | % |  |   |      |  



Interest income and
other expense, net consists of interest income, realized gains and losses on short-term investments, our pro rata share of net income or loss on our equity method investment and foreign currency gains and losses. The decreases in interest income and
other expense, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 reflected reduced interest income as a result of lower interest rates and the sale of certain fixed income investments prior to maturity. Interest income was $449,000 and $1.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and $745,000 and $1.4 million in the corresponding periods in 2003. The three and six months ended June 30, 2004 also reflected losses on retirement of fixed assets of $125,000 and
$372,000, respectively, and our pro rata share of net losses on our equity method investments of $335,000 and $606,000, respectively. The three and six months ended June 30, 2003 reflected write-downs of $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively,
from other-than-temporary declines in the estimated fair market value of various long-term equity investments, and the three month period ended June 30, 2003 reflected other income of $629,000 in connection with a lease buy-out related to a vacant
facility assumed in our acquisition of Kinexus.



The remaining
components of interest income and other expense, net fluctuate primarily due to foreign currency gains and losses.



Benefit from Income Taxes



|                              |  |                            |     |   |      |   |                          |        |  |      |       |  |      |     |   |        |   |        |   |  |   |      
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --- | - | ---- | - | ------------------------ | ------ |  | ---- | ----- |  | ---- | --- | - | ------ | - | ------ | - |  | - | -----
|                              |  | Three Months Ended June 30 |     |   |      |   | Six Months Ended June 30 |        |  |     
|                              |  | 2004                       |     |   | 2003 |   |                          | Change |  | 2004 |       |  | 2003 |     |   | Change
|Benefit from income taxes     |  | $                          | (21 | ) |      | $ | (4,384                   | )      |  | $    | 4,363 |  | $    | (21 | ) |        | $ | (8,411 | ) |  | $ | 8,390
|Percent of total net revenues |  |                            | 0   | % |      |   | -14                      | %      |  |      |       |  |      | 0   | % |        |   | -13    | % |  |   |      



For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded a benefit of $21,000, compared to a benefit from income taxes of $4.4 million and $8.4 million recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. We account for income taxes under an asset and liability
approach that requires the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities to be recognized as deferred tax assets and liabilities. During the fourth quarter of 2003, we established a
full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in the United States because we determined it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future. Therefore our tax provision will typically
reflect only small foreign tax charges or benefits.



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES



Our aggregate cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities at June 30, 2004 were $166.9 million, compared with $160.1 million at December 31, 2003. Cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of 90 days or less.



The table below, for the periods indicated, provides selected
condensed consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):



|                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                    |  | Six Months Ended June30 |        
|                                                    |  | 2004                    |         |   | 2003 |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities           |  | $                       | 12,476  |   |      | $ | 2,960  |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  | $                       | (15,028 | ) |      | $ | 1,588  |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  | $                       | 3,405   |   |      | $ | (9,930 | )



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Operating Activities



Our cash flows from operating activities represent the most significant source of funding for our operations. Operating
activities provided $12.5 million and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our cash provided by operating activities generally follows the trend in our net revenues and operating results. Our net losses in the
six months ended June 30, 2004 were more than offset by non-cash charges including depreciation, amortization, loss on disposition of fixed assets, and loss on investments.



Other sources of cash in the first six months of 2004 included a decrease in prepaid and other assets, and an increase in
accrued liabilities. The decrease in prepaid and other assets reflected prepaid expense amortization and collection of a receivable for a litigation settlement recorded in the fourth quarter of 2003. The increase in accrued liabilities was primarily
due to additional accrued restructuring charges during the period. Effective April 1, 2004, we changed the methodology for recording accounts receivable and deferred revenue. In prior periods, we netted down any amounts in deferred revenue that were
still outstanding as a receivable. Beginning on April 1, 2004 accounts receivable and deferred revenue are shown gross instead of net, as no offset entry is made. Using a comparable balance at December 31, 2003 (See Note 8, Balance Sheet
Detail to the condensed consolidated financial statements), accounts receivable would have decreased by approximately $5.1 million which reflects strong collections during the period. Further, deferred revenues would have decreased $0.8
million which reflects recognition of revenue related to license contracts signed primarily during the third quarter of 2003.



We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors including fluctuations in our net
revenues and operating results, amount of revenue deferred, collection of accounts receivable, and timing of payments.



Cash Flows from Investing Activities



Net cash used in investing activities of $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, consisted primarily of net purchase marketable securities
of $8.0 million, cash used in acquisitions, including payments of assumed liabilities, of $5.8 million, and purchases of property and equipment of $1.3 million. Net cash provided by investing activities of $1.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2003 consisted of net sales and maturities of marketable securities of $15.5 million and was partially offset by cash used in acquisitions, including payments of assumed liabilities, of $9.9 million and purchases of property and equipment of
$4.1 million.



On May 3, 2004, we purchased the remaining
independent distributor businesses from our independent European distributor, Advent Europe, in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, as well as certain assets of Advent Europe, for initial consideration of $5.8 million and additional potential
consideration of approximately $3.6 million, of which $1.8 million was earned during the second quarter of 2004 and recorded as additional goodwill. The $1.8 million will be paid during the third quarter of 2004. Over the last year, we have added
significant customers in the European, Middle East and African regions and view this as an increasingly important market for us in the future. See Note 12, Acquisitions to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional
information regarding the acquisition. Going forward, we may consider acquiring additional businesses from time to time. We expect our expenditures for property and equipment in 2004 to remain relatively flat to down as compared to 2003.



Cash Flows from Financing Activities



Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30,
2004 of $3.4 million reflected proceeds of $4.3 million from the issuance of common stock related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan, offset by the repurchase of 48,000 shares of common stock for $0.9 million. Net cash
used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of $9.9 million primarily reflected the repurchase of 1.0 million shares of our common stock for $14.3 million, partially offset by stock issued through employee stock purchase and
stock option plans of $4.5 million.



Our liquidity, capital
resources and results of operations in any period could be affected by the exercise of outstanding stock options and issuance of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan. The resulting increase in the number of outstanding shares could
also affect, our per share results of operations. However, we cannot predict the timing or amount of proceeds from the exercise of these securities, or whether they will be exercised at all. Furthermore, we intend to continue our common stock
repurchase activity under the share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors and publicly announced in May 2004.



At June 30, 2004, we had $132.4 million in working capital. We currently have no significant capital commitments other than commitments under our
operating leases, which declined from $46.2 million at December 31, 2003 to $41.9 million at June 30, 2004.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations (in thousands):



|                            |  |                                  |       |                        |      |       |      |   |       |  |            |       |       |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |       
|--------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ----- | ---------------------- | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---------- | ----- | ----- | - | ----- |  | - | ----- |  | - | ------
|                            |  | Six Months EndedDecember 31 2004 |       | Year Ended December 31 |      |       |      |  
|                            |  |                                  | 2005  |                        | 2006 |       | 2007 |   | 2008  |  | Thereafter |       | Total
|Operating lease obligations |  | $                                | 4,370 |                        | $    | 8,685 |      | $ | 8,143 |  | $          | 6,656 |       | $ | 6,252 |  | $ | 7,836 |  | $ | 41,942
|                            |  |                                  |       |                        |      |       |      |   |       |  |            |       |       |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |       



At June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.



We have taken numerous actions over the last year to
strengthen our cash position and balance sheet and to improve our ability to generate positive cash flow from operating activities. Many of these actions were taken in the last half of 2003 in order to offset the negative impacts on our net revenues
resulting from the downturn in the financial services industry and decreased information technology spending.



We expect that for the foreseeable future, our operating expenses will continue to constitute a significant use of our cash balances. In addition, we may
use cash to fund acquisitions or invest in other businesses. Based upon our past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to
satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements, stock repurchases, commitments and financing activities for at least the next 12 months.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations



Our off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2004 consist of obligations under operating leases. See Note 13,
Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements and the Liquidity and Capital Resources section above for further discussion and a tabular presentation of our contractual obligations.



RISK FACTORS



Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. These risks are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock
could decline due to any of these risks. In assessing these risks, investors should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.



Our Operating Results May Fluctuate Significantly.



Licenses into multi-user networked environments have varied both in individual size and number, and the timing and size of individual license transactions are important factors in quarterly operating results. The
sales and contracting cycles for these transactions are often lengthy and unpredictable. We may not be successful in closing large license transactions such as these on a timely basis or at all. Accordingly, because revenues from large licenses may
vary as a portion of our net revenues, the timing of such licenses causes additional variability in our quarterly operating results. Software product backlog at the beginning of any quarter may not represent a material portion of that quarters
revenues. Our backlog is primarily comprised of deferred revenues from our maintenance and term contracts, professional services not yet delivered, and certain software license orders that have not met all requirements for revenue recognition. It is
our intent to increase the proportion of license revenue from term licenses, and as a result of selling to larger clients we may enter into more complex transactions which involve acceptance criteria. Therefore, more of our revenue may be required
to be deferred. Our expense levels are based in significant part on our expectations of future revenues and therefore are relatively fixed in the short term. Due to the fixed nature of these expenses, combined with the relatively high gross margin
historically achieved on our products, an unanticipated decline in net revenues in any particular quarter may adversely affect our operating results. We have often recognized a substantial portion of each quarters license revenues in the last
month, weeks or even days of the quarter. As a result, the magnitude of quarterly fluctuations in revenue or earnings may not be evident until late in or after the close of a particular quarter and a disruption late in the quarter may have a
disproportionately large negative impact on our quarterly results. These factors have impacted and may continue to impact our results.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition, we experience seasonality in our license revenue. The fourth quarter of the year typically
has the highest license revenue, followed by lower revenue in the first quarter of the succeeding year. We believe that this seasonality results primarily from customer budgeting cycles. We expect this seasonality to continue in the future.



Because of the above factors, we believe that period-to-period
comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance.



Our Sales Cycle is Long and We Have Limited Ability to Forecast the Timing and Amount of Specific Sales.



The purchase of our software products often requires prospective customers
to provide significant executive-level sponsorship and to make major systems architecture decisions. As a result, we must generally engage in a relatively lengthy sales and contracting effort. Sales transactions may therefore be delayed during the
customer decision process because we must provide a significant level of education to prospective customers regarding the use and benefit of our products. This has been exacerbated by the adverse and uncertain economic conditions that have caused
existing and potential clients to reduce or cancel expenditures and delay decisions related to acquisition of software and related services. While we have seen somewhat improved economic conditions in the past three quarters, customers are still
very cautious about capital and information technology expenditures. As a result, the sales cycle associated with the purchase of our solutions is typically between two and twelve months depending upon the size of the client, and is subject to a
number of significant risks over which we have little or no control, including customers budgeting constraints, internal selection procedures, and changes in customer personnel, among others. As a result of a lengthy and unpredictable sales
cycle, we have limited ability to forecast the timing and amount of specific license sales. The timing of large individual license sales is especially difficult to forecast, and we may not be successful in closing large license transactions on a
timely basis or at all. In addition, customers may postpone their purchases of our existing products or product enhancements in advance of the anticipated introduction of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors. Because our
expenses are relatively fixed in the near term, any shortfall from anticipated revenues could result in a significant variation in our operating results from quarter to quarter.



We Depend upon Financial Markets.



The target clients for our products include a range of financial services organizations that manage investment portfolios, including asset managers,
investment advisors, brokerage firms, banks, family offices, hedge funds and others. In addition, we target corporations, public funds, universities and non-profit organizations, which also manage investment portfolios and have many of the same
needs. The success of many of our clients is intrinsically linked to the health of the financial markets. We believe that demand for our solutions has been, and could continue to be, disproportionately affected by fluctuations, disruptions,
instability or downturns in the financial services industry which may cause clients and potential clients to exit the industry or delay, cancel or reduce any planned expenditures for investment management systems and software products. Also, recent
investigative efforts into various mutual fund and other financial industry practices could impact our business if the industry experiences a decline in business. In addition, a slowdown in the formation of new investment firms or a decline in the
growth of assets under management would cause a decline in demand for our solutions. We believe that the downturn in the financial services industry and the decline in information technology spending continued to negatively impact the demand for our
products in the past two years, and that continuing uncertainty about financial markets and the financial services sector could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.



We Depend Heavily on Our Product, Axys.



Historically, we have derived a majority of our net revenues from the
licensing of Axys, and related ancillary products and services. In addition, many of our other applications, such as Partner, Moxy, Qube and various data interfaces were designed to operate with Axys to provide an integrated solution. As a result,
we believe that for the foreseeable future a majority of our net revenues will depend upon continued market acceptance of Axys, enhancements or upgrades to Axys and related products and services. As our clients include a range of organizations,
including asset managers, investment advisors, brokerage firms, banks, family offices, hedge funds and others, the degree of continued market acceptance also will depend on the number of firms within each type of organization and the degree to which
Axys previously penetrated those firms.



Uncertain Economic Conditions May
Continue to Affect our Revenues.



We believe that the
market for large investment management software systems may be negatively impacted by a number of factors, including reductions in capital expenditures by large customers, poor performance of major financial markets, and increasing competition.
Those factors may, in turn, give rise to a number of market trends which we have experienced in the past two years that have slowed revenue growth across the financial services industry, including longer sales and contracting cycles, deferral or
delay of information technology projects and generally reduced expenditures for software and related services. If the downturn in the financial services industry and information technology spending continues, the presence of these factors in the
market for large investment management solutions will likely materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

We Face Intense Competition.



The market for investment management software is intensely competitive and highly fragmented, is subject to rapid change and
is sensitive to new product introductions and marketing efforts by industry participants. Our largest single source of competition is from proprietary systems used by existing and potential clients, many of whom develop their own software for their
particular needs and therefore may be reluctant to license software products offered by independent vendors like Advent. Other competitors include providers of software and related services as well as providers of outsourced services, and include
some of the following vendors: Beauchamp, Charles River Development, CheckFree Corporation, divisions of SunGard, Eagle, a subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation, Eze Castle Software, Financial Models Company, Inc., Financial Interactive Data,
Indata, Linedata, Macgregor Financial Technologies, Schwab Performance Technologies, SS&C Technologies, Inc., and the Portia division of Thomson Financial.



Our competitors vary in size, scope of services offered and platforms supported. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories and greater
financial, technical, sales and marketing resources than we do. In addition, we also face competition from potential new entrants into our market that may develop innovative technologies or business models. We cannot guarantee that we will be able
to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressures will not result in price reductions, reduced operating margins or loss of market share, any one of which could seriously harm our business.



We Must Continue to Introduce New Products and Product Enhancements.



The market for our products is characterized by rapid technological change,
changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards. New products based on new technologies or new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, our future success will continue to depend upon our
ability to develop new products or product enhancements that address the future needs of our target markets and to respond to these changing standards and practices. We may not be successful in developing, introducing and marketing new products or
product enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis, or at all, and our new products and product enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace or achieve market acceptance. Delays in the commencement of commercial
shipments of new products or enhancements may result in client dissatisfaction and delay or loss of product revenues. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products or enhancements of existing products in
a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or client requirements, or if new products or new versions of existing products do not achieve market acceptance, our business would be seriously harmed. In addition, our ability to develop
new products and product enhancements is dependent upon the products of other software vendors, including certain system software vendors, such as Microsoft Corporation, Sun Microsystems, database vendors and development tool vendors. If the
products of such vendors have design defects or flaws, are unexpectedly delayed in their introduction, or are unavailable on acceptable terms, our business could be seriously harmed. Our software products are complex and may contain undetected
defects or errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. Although we have not experienced adverse effects resulting from any software errors, we cannot be sure that, despite testing by us and our clients, defects or errors will not
be found in new products after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or delay in market acceptance, which could seriously harm our business.



We Must Retain Key Employees and Recruit Qualified Technical and Sales Personnel.



We believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our
senior management and other key personnel. Additionally, our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to identify, attract, motivate and retain qualified technical, sales and other personnel. Because our future success is dependent on our
ability to continue to enhance and introduce new products, we are particularly dependent on our ability to identify, attract, motivate and retain qualified engineers with the requisite education, backgrounds and industry experience. The loss of the
services of a significant number of our engineers or sales people could be disruptive to our development efforts or business relationships and could seriously harm our business. We may also be required to create additional performance and retention
incentives in order to retain our employees, including the granting of additional stock options to employees at current prices or issuing incentive cash bonuses. Such incentives may either dilute our existing stockholder base or result in unforeseen
operating expenses, which may cause our stock price to fall.



Difficulties
in Integrating Our Acquisitions Have Impacted and Could Continue to Adversely Impact Our Business and We Face Risks Associated With Potential Acquisitions, Investments or Divestitures.



From 2001 through the middle of 2003, our strategy focused on growth through
the acquisition of additional complementary businesses. During those years, we made five major acquisitions and also acquired all of the common stock of five of our European distributors subsidiaries. In addition, in May of 2004, we purchased
our distributors in the United Kingdom and Switzerland.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

The complex process of integrating our acquisitions has required and will continue to require significant
resources, particularly in light of our relative inexperience in integrating acquisitions. Integrating these acquisitions has been and will continue to be time-consuming, expensive and disruptive to our business. This integration process has in the
past, and could continue to strain our managerial resources and result in the diversion of these resources from our core business objectives. Failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions or to successfully integrate the
operations of these entities has harmed and could continue to harm our business, results of operations and cash flows. For example, in the first quarter of 2003, we closed our Australian subsidiary because it failed to perform at a satisfactory
profit level. We may not realize the benefits we anticipate from these acquisitions because of the following significant challenges:



| |  |  | expected synergy benefits from these acquisitions, such as lower costs or increased revenues, may not be realized or may be realized more slowly than anticipated, particularly with
regard to costs associated with reductions in headcount and facilities;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | potentially incompatible cultural differences between the companies;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incorporating these companies technologies and products into our current and future product lines;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | geographic dispersion of operations and the complexities of international operations;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | integrating the technical teams of these companies with our engineering organizations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | generating market demand for an expanded product line;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | integrating the products of these companies with our business, because we do not have distribution, manufacturing, marketing or support experience for these products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the difficulty of leveraging our combined technologies and capabilities across all product lines and customer bases; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our inability to retain significant customers or key employees of these entities.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs and commit significant management time in integrating the
operations, technology, development programs, products, administrative and information systems, customers and personnel of these acquisitions. These costs have been and will likely continue to be substantial and include costs for:



| |  |  | integrating and reorganizing operations, including combining teams, facilities and processes in various functional areas;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | identifying duplicative or redundant resources and facilities, developing plans for resource consolidation and implementing those plans;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fees and expenses of professionals and consultants involved in completing the integration process;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | settling existing liabilities of these companies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | uncovering through our audit process new issues reflected on the companies financial statements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | vacating, subleasing and closing facilities;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | employee relocation, redeployment or severance costs;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | discontinuing certain products and services;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | integrating technology and products; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | other transaction costs associated with the acquisition, including financial advisor, attorney, accountant and exchange agent fees.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



We may make additional acquisitions of complementary companies, products or
technologies in the future. In addition, we continually evaluate the performance of all our products and product lines and may sell or discontinue current products or product lines. Failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of any future
acquisition or divestiture could also harm our business, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, we may have to incur debt, write-off investments, infrastructure costs or other assets, incur severance liabilities, write-off impaired
goodwill or other intangible assets or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions. The issuance of equity securities could dilute our existing stockholders ownership. Finally, we may not identify suitable businesses to acquire
or negotiate acceptable terms for acquisitions.



Difficulties We May
Encounter Managing Changes in the Size of Our Business Could Adversely Affect Our Operating Results.



Our business has experienced years of rapid growth through both internal expansion and acquisitions, followed by reduced revenues in 2002 and 2003, and
significant downsizing during 2003. These changes have caused and may continue to cause a significant strain on our infrastructure, internal systems and managerial resources. Beginning in 2003, we took steps to better align our resources with our
operating requirements in order to increase our efficiency. Through these steps, we reduced our headcount, closed selected offices and incurred charges for employee severance and excess facilities capacity. While we believe



34



---

##### Table of Contents

that these steps help us achieve greater operating efficiency, we have limited history with such measures and the results
of these measures are less than predictable. Additional restructuring efforts may be required. To manage our business effectively, we must continue to improve our infrastructure, including operating and administrative systems and controls; and
continue managing headcount, capital and processes in an efficient manner. Our productivity and the quality of our products may be adversely affected if we do not integrate and train our employees quickly and effectively and coordinate among our
executive, engineering, finance, marketing, sales, operations and customer support organizations, all of which add to the complexity of our organization. We believe workforce reductions, management changes and facility consolidation create anxiety
and uncertainty and may adversely affect employee morale. These measures could adversely affect our employees that we wish to retain and may also adversely affect our ability to hire new personnel. They may also affect customers. In addition, our
revenues may not grow in alignment with our headcount.



We Face Risks
Related to Our New Business Areas.



During 2001 and 2002
we expanded into a number of new business areas, for example international operations, strategic alliances, acquisitions such as Advent Wealth Service, Techfi and Advent BackOffice and offerings such as Wealthline. These areas are still relatively
new to our product development and sales personnel. Some of these new business areas have required significant management time and resources without generating significant revenues, and have diverted and may continue to divert management from our
core business. While our traditional offerings are marketed to investment managers and advisors, Advent Wealth Service and Wealthline are also targeted for use by our clients customers. We have had difficulty and may continue to have
difficulty creating demand from our clients customers as we market to them indirectly, through our clients. Revenue growth has suffered and may continue to suffer if we cannot create demand among our clients customers.



We Face Challenges in Expanding Our International Operations.



We market and sell our products in the United States and, to a lesser
extent, internationally. In 1999, we entered into a distributor relationship with Advent Europe, an independent distributor of our products in selected European markets. In November 2001, we acquired the Norwegian, Swedish, and Danish companies of
this independent distributor. In September 2002, we purchased their Greek subsidiary; in May 2003, we purchased their Dutch subsidiary; and in May 2004, we purchased their remaining subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Switzerland and certain
assets of Advent Europe. To further expand our international operations, we would need to establish additional locations, acquire other businesses or enter into additional distribution relationships in other parts of the world. Any further expansion
of our existing international operations and entry into new international markets could require significant management attention and financial resources. We cannot be certain that establishing businesses in other countries will produce the desired
levels of revenues. We currently have limited experience in developing localized versions of our products and marketing and distributing our products internationally. In addition, international operations are subject to other inherent risks,
including:



| |  |  | the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in successfully adapting our products to the language, regulatory and technology standards of other countries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | potentially adverse tax consequences; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | political and economic instability.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



The revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of our international subsidiaries are primarily denominated in local currencies. We have not historically
undertaken foreign exchange hedging transactions to cover potential foreign currency exposure. Future fluctuations in currency exchange rates may adversely affect revenues and accounts receivable from international sales and the U.S. dollar value of
our foreign subsidiaries revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. Our international revenues from our distributors are generally denominated in local foreign currencies with the exception of our Geneva license transactions.



Writing Off Investments Could Harm Our Results of Operations.



We have made investments in privately held companies, which we classify as
other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The value of these investments is influenced by many factors, including the operating effectiveness of these companies, the overall health of these companies industries, the strength
of the private equity markets and general market conditions. Due to these and other factors, we have previously determined, and may in the future determine, that the value of these investments is impaired, which has caused and would cause us to
write down the carrying value of these investments, such as the write downs of our investments of $2.0 million, $13.5 million and $2.0 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Furthermore,



35



---

##### Table of Contents

we cannot be sure that future investment, license, fixed asset or other asset write-downs will not happen, particularly
if the downturn in the financial services industry and the decline in information technology spending continues. If future write-downs do occur, they could harm our business and results of operations.



Information We Provide to Investors is Accurate Only as of the Date We Disseminate it.



From time to time, we may publicly disseminate
forward-looking information or guidance in compliance with Regulation FD. This information or guidance represents our outlook only as of the date we disseminate it, and we do not undertake to update such information or guidance.



Our Stock Price has Fluctuated Significantly.



Like many companies in the technology and emerging growth sector, our stock
price may be subject to wide fluctuations, particularly during times of high market volatility. If net revenues or earnings in any quarter fail to meet the investment communitys expectations, our stock price is likely to decline. In addition,
our stock price is affected by trends in the financial services sector and by broader market trends unrelated to our performance. For instance, in the event of increased hostilities in the Middle East or additional terrorist attacks, there could be
increased market volatility, which could negatively impact our stock price.



If Our Relationship with Interactive Data Corporation Is Terminated, Our Business May Be Harmed.



Many of our clients use our proprietary interface to electronically retrieve pricing and other data from Interactive Data Corporation (IDC). IDC pays us a
commission based on their revenues from providing this data to our clients. Our software products have been customized to be compatible with their system and this software would need to be redesigned if their services were unavailable for any
reason. Termination of our agreement with IDC would require at least two years notice by either us or them, or 90 days in the case of material breach. Our revenue could be adversely impacted if our relationship with IDC were terminated or their
services were unavailable to our clients for any reason.



If We Are Unable
to Protect Our Intellectual Property We May Be Subject to Increased Competition That Could Seriously Harm Our Business.



Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary technology. We currently rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets,
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We have registered trademarks for many of our products and services and will continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as appropriate. We
generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and with our resellers and customers. We seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only limited
protection. Despite these efforts, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of our products or to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary information. We do not have any patents, and existing
copyright laws afford only limited protection. In addition, we cannot be certain that others will not develop substantially equivalent or superseding proprietary technology, or that equivalent products will not be marketed in competition with our
products, thereby substantially reducing the value of our proprietary rights. We cannot be sure that we will develop proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any patent, if issued, would provide us with any competitive
advantages or would not be challenged by third parties, or that the patents of others will not adversely affect our ability to do business. Litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary technology. This litigation may be time-consuming and
expensive. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not
protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. We cannot be sure that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology,
duplicate our products or design around any patent that may be issued to us or other intellectual property rights of ours.



If We Infringe the Intellectual Property Rights of Others, We May Incur Additional Costs or Be Prevented from Selling our Products and Services.



We cannot be certain that our products or services do not infringe the
intellectual property rights of others. As a result, we may be subject to litigation and claims, including claims of infringement of patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights of third parties that would be time-consuming and costly
to resolve. If we discovered that our products or services violated the intellectual property rights of third parties, we would have to make substantial changes to our products or services or obtain licenses from such third parties. We might not be
able to obtain such licenses on favorable terms or at all, and we may be unable to change our products successfully or in a timely manner. Failure to resolve an infringement matter successfully or in a timely manner, would force us to incur
significant costs, including damages, redevelopment costs, diversion of managements attention and satisfaction of indemnification obligations that we have with our clients, as well as prevent us from selling certain products or services.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

Business Interruptions Could Adversely Affect Our Business.



Our operations are exposed to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss,
telecommunications failure, and other events beyond our control. Additionally, we are vulnerable to interruption caused by political and terrorist incidents. For example, our facilities in New York were temporarily closed due to the September 11,
2001 terrorist attacks. Immediately after the terrorist attacks, our clients who were located in the World Trade Center area were concentrating on disaster recovery rather than licensing additional software components, while the grounding of
transportation impeded our ability to deliver professional services at client sites. Additionally, during the temporary closure of the U.S. stock markets, our clients did not use our market data services. Such interruptions could affect our ability
to sell and deliver products and services and other critical functions of our business and could seriously harm us. Further, such attacks could cause instability in the financial markets upon which we depend.



Undetected Software Errors or Failures Found in New Products May Result in Loss of or
Delay in Market Acceptance of Our Products That Could Seriously Harm Our Business.



Our products may contain undetected software errors or failures or scalability limitations at any point in the life of the product, but particularly when first introduced or as new versions are released. Despite
testing by us and by current and potential customers, errors may not be found in new products until after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or a delay in market acceptance, damage to our reputation, customer dissatisfaction
and reductions in revenues and margins, any of which could seriously harm our business. Additionally, our agreements with customers that attempt to limit our exposure to liability claims may not be enforceable in jurisdictions where we operate.



Recently Enacted and Proposed Changes in Securities Laws and Regulations
Will Increase Our Costs.



The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(the Act) of 2002, which became law in July 2002, requires changes in some of our corporate governance and securities disclosure and/or compliance practices. As part of the Acts requirements, the Securities and Exchange Commission
has been promulgating new rules on a variety of subjects, in addition to other rule proposals, and the NASDAQ Stock Market has enacted new corporate governance listing requirements. These developments have and will continue to increase our
accounting and legal compliance costs, particularly in 2004, and could also expose us to additional liability. In addition, such developments may make retention and recruitment of qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or executive
management more difficult. We continue to evaluate and monitor regulatory and legislative developments and cannot reliably estimate the timing or magnitude of all costs we may incur as a result of the Act or other related legislation or regulation.



Our Financial Results Could be Affected by Potential Changes in the
Accounting Rules Governing the Recognition of Stock-based Compensation Expense.



We measure compensation expense for our employee stock compensation plans under the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. On March
31, 2004, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft of a proposed new Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (Statement) entitled Share-Based Payments, which proposes a requirement to use a fair-value based method similar to the
fair-value method prescribed in FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The FASB is currently receiving comments on this proposed Statement and has proposed the adoption of a final Statement effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2004. There is ongoing debate as to whether stock option and employee stock purchase plan shares should be treated as compensation, and if so, how to value such compensation charges. The ultimate requirements of
any new accounting standard are uncertain. However, if we are required to record an expense for our stock-based compensation plans using a fair-value method, we could have significant accounting charges. For example, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2004, had we accounted for stock-based compensation plans using the fair-value method prescribed in FASB Statement No. 123, our net loss would have increased by $2.5 million and $5.2 million respectively.



Security Risks May Harm Our Business.



A significant barrier to commerce and communications over public networks is
the secure transmission of confidential information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments could result in compromises or breaches of our security systems. Anyone who
circumvents our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services or operations. In addition, computer viruses or software programs that disable or impair computers could be introduced into our
systems or those of our customers or other third parties, which could disrupt or make our systems inaccessible to customers. Our security measures may be inadequate to prevent security breaches, which could harm our business, exposing us to a risk
of loss, litigation and other possible liabilities, as well as possibly requiring us expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting May Not Be Considered Effective Which Could Result in a Loss of Investor
Confidence in Our Financial Reports, and in Turn Have an Adverse Effect on Our Stock Price.



Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, we
will be required to furnish a report which we have not been previously required to furnish, a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. Such report will contain, among other matters, our assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by management. Such report will also contain a statement that our auditors have issued an attestation report on managements assessment of such internal controls.
This report requires management to make subjective judgments and, particularly because it is newly required, some of the judgments will be in areas that may be open to interpretation and therefore the report may be uniquely difficult to prepare and
our auditors may not agree with our assessments.



The Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) provides a framework for companies to assess and improve their internal control systems. While we believe our internal controls are operating effectively, we continue to enhance our
internal control over financial reporting by adding additional resources in key functional areas and bringing all of our operations up to the level of documentation, segregation of duties, and systems security necessary, as well as transactional
control procedures required, under the COSO standard (and interpretations thereof) for internal control.



If our management identifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert such internal
control is effective. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective (or if our auditors are unable to attest that our managements report is fairly stated or they are unable to express an opinion on
our managements evaluation or on the effectiveness of the internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our stock price.



Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk



We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Historically, much of our revenues and
capital spending was transacted in U.S. dollars. However, since the acquisitions of Advent Denmark, Advent Norway, Advent Sweden, Advent Hellas, Advent Netherlands, and Advent Europes remaining distributors in the United Kingdom and
Switzerland, whose revenues, with the exception of Geneva transactions and capital spending, are transacted in local country currencies, we have greater exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. The results of operations from these territories are
not material to our operating results; therefore, we believe that foreign currency exchange rates should not materially adversely affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Our interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio, which
consisted of $26.7 million in cash equivalents and $131.3 million in marketable securities as of June 30, 2004. An immediate sharp increase in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the fair value of our investment portfolio.
Conversely, immediate sharp declines in interest rates could seriously harm interest earnings of our investment portfolio. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio, nor hedge for these interest rate
exposures.



By policy, we limit our exposure to
longer-term investments, and a majority of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 had maturities of less than one year. As a result of the relatively short duration of our portfolio, an immediate hypothetical parallel shift
to the yield curve of plus 25 basis points (BPS), 50 BPS and 100 BPS would result in a reduction of 0.11%, 0.22% and 0.44%, respectively, in the market value of our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2004.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

We have also invested in several privately-held companies, most of which can still be considered in the
start-up or development stages. These non-marketable investments are classified as other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Our investments in privately-held companies could be affected by an adverse movement in the financial
markets for publicly-traded equity securities, although the impact cannot be directly quantified. These investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products these privately-held companies have under development are
typically in the early stages and may never materialize. The value of these investments is also influenced by factors including the operating effectiveness of these companies, the overall health of the companies industries and the strength of
the private equity markets. We could lose our entire investment in these companies. At June 30, 2004 our net investments in privately-held companies totaled $8.3 million.



Item 4. Controls and Procedures



Evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures



We maintain a set of
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information relating to Advent Software, Inc. required to be disclosed in periodic filings under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported in a timely manner under the Exchange Act.



In
connection with the original filing of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as required under Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2004.



Subsequent to the period covered by this report, in connection with our
preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, management of the Company determined that the previously issued financial statements contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2003 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 should be restated to correct errors in those financial statements. This restatement is further
discussed in Note 2, Restatement of Financial Statements to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.



As a result, we are implementing a change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) to remediate internal control deficiencies that led to the restatements noted above. Management has concluded that these internal control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected. Management identified the following material weaknesses in its assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting:



| |  |  | As of December 31, 2004, the Company did not maintain effective controls over the valuation of its property and equipment accounts, including the related restructuring provision.
Specifically, the Companys impairment analysis of its property and equipment accounts related to its decision to vacate a facility failed to identify and include all applicable assets. This control deficiency resulted in a restatement of the
Companys financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 and an adjustment to the fourth quarter 2004 financial statements. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the property
and equipment accounts and related restructuring provision that would result in a material misstatement to annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has determined that this condition
constitutes a material weakness.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As of December 31, 2004, the Company did not maintain effective controls over the accounting for income taxes, including the determination of income taxes payable, deferred income
tax assets and liabilities and the related income tax provision. Specifically, the Company did not have controls to identify that deferred income tax assets and related deferred income tax valuation allowances had been inappropriately recorded.
Further, the Company did not have controls in place to include all state income tax liabilities in its income taxes payable account. These control deficiencies resulted in a restatement of the Companys financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2003, the quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004, and an adjustment to the fourth quarter 2004 financial statements. Additionally, these control deficiencies could result in a misstatement to the income
taxes payable, deferred income tax asset and liabilities, and income tax provision accounts that would result in a material misstatement to annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has
determined that these conditions constitute material weaknesses.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Because of these material weaknesses, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2004, as well as at June 30, 2004, based on the
criteria set forth in the COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework.



Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

The Companys management has identified the steps necessary to address the material weaknesses in
our internal control over financial reporting described above. Our remediation plan is:



| |  |  | To document the standards established by our principal financial and accounting officer and other senior accounting personnel for the review, analysis, verification and final
determination of the proper accounting treatment for all charges associated with the termination or abandonment of building leases, including establishing a checklist of items to be reviewed in connection with such transactions;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To improve the skills, knowledge and experience available to the Company for the preparation and review of our tax provision calculations, through potentially hiring additional tax
accounting personnel and by utilizing outside tax consultants;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To improve the process, procedures and documentation standards relating to the preparation of the income tax provision calculations; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To increase the level of review of the preparation of the quarterly and annual income tax provision calculations.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Company has begun executing on a remediation plan and expects to have
implemented the new control procedures and to have hired additional tax accounting personnel by the end of the second quarter of 2005.



Changes in internal controls over financial reporting



In July 2004, we reviewed our stock repurchases in 2001, 2002 and 2003 and determined that our allocation of the entire cash paid in excess of par value
for these repurchases to additional paid-in capital was not the correct accounting treatment. The correct accounting treatment is to calculate the average additional paid-in capital per outstanding share at the beginning of each period in which
stock was repurchased, and then allocate the difference between the repurchase price per share and the sum of the par value and average additional paid-in capital per share as a reduction to retained earnings. We have restated our financial
statements for these periods to reflect the proper allocation, resulting in additional paid-in capital increasing by a cumulative amount of approximately $41 million and retained earnings decreasing by the same amount. See Note 13 to our
consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K/A for fiscal 2003 filed on July 30, 2004. Advents income statement, cash and cash equivalents, total stockholders equity and shares of common stock outstanding are unaffected by
these adjustments for all periods. We have determined that, under Auditing Standard No. 2 and the prior relevant professional auditing standards, this deficiency constituted a significant deficiency, but not a material
weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. We have advised our independent auditors, who concur with our determination, and our audit committee of this significant deficiency in our internal controls over financial
reporting. We believe that we have addressed this deficiency by establishing additional controls to review equity transactions.



Accordingly, there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting which was identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule
13(a)-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months June 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1. Legal Proceedings



From
time to time Advent is involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Advent is not party to any lawsuit or proceeding that, in Advents opinion, is likely to seriously harm the Companys business.



Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds



During 2001 and 2002, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to 4.0 million shares of Advents common stock in the open market. As of June 30, 2004, Advent has repurchased and retired 3.8 million
shares for a total cost of $78.8 million under this repurchase plan. None of these shares were repurchased during the three months ended June 30, 2004. Advent does not intend to make further purchases under this stock repurchase program.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

In May 2004, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to an additional 1.2 million shares
of Advents common stock in the open market. The following table provides a month-to-month summary of the repurchase activity under the May 2004 stock repurchase program during the three months ended June 30, 2004:



|           |  |                               |  |                           |       |                                                                              |    |                                                                                        |      
|---------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----
|           |  | TotalNumberof SharesPurchased |  | AveragePricePaidPer Share |       | TotalNumber of SharesPurchased as Part ofPublicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs |    | MaximumNumber of Shares ThatMay Yet Be PurchasedUnder Our ShareRepurchase Programs (1)
|           |  | (shares in thousands)        
|April 2004 |  |                              |  | $                         |      |                                                                              |   |                                                                                        | 215  
|May 2004   |  |                              |  |                           |      |                                                                              |   |                                                                                        | 1,415
|June 2004  |  | 48                            |  |                           | 17.88 |                                                                              | 48 |                                                                                        | 1,367
|           |  |                               |  |                           |       |                                                                              |    |                                                                                        |      
|Total      |  | 48                            |  | $                         | 17.88 |                                                                              | 48 |                                                                                        | 1,367
|           |  |                               |  |                           |       |                                                                              |    |                                                                                        |      

---

|(1) | Includes 215,000 shares repurchasable under the suspended 2001 and 2002 program.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities



None.



Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Advent Software, Inc. was held at the principal office of the Company at 301 Brannan Street, 6thFloor, San Francisco, California 94107 on May 12, 2004. Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2004 (the Record Date) were
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. As of the Record Date, 33,107,797 shares of the Companys common stock were issued and outstanding, and a quorum of 30,631,703 shares of common stock were represented in person or by proxy at
the Annual Meeting.



At the Annual Meeting, four items were voted upon:



1. To elect six directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified.



|                     |           |                  |          |          
|-------------------- | --------- | ---------------- | -------- | ---------
|                     |           | Number of Shares
|                     | Voted For |                  | Withheld
|John H. Scully       |           | 29,281,668       |          | 1,350,035
|Stephanie G. DiMarco |           | 29,729,779       |          | 901,924  
|Terry H. Carlitz     |           | 28,616,161       |          | 2,015,542
|James P. Roemer      |           | 29,704,337       |          | 927,366  
|Wendell G. Van Auken |           | 29,079,229       |          | 1,552,474
|William F. Zuendt    |           | 29,075,987       |          | 1,555,716



2. To approve the 2004 Director
Option Plan and reserve 600,000 shares of Company common stock for issuance thereunder.



|                           |  |                  |  |            |  |           |  |                 
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ---------- |  | --------- |  | ----------------
|                           |  | Number of Shares
|                           |  | For              |  | Against    |  | Abstained |  | Broker Non-Votes
|                           |  |                  | 
|2004 Director Option Plan* |  | 11,983,020       |  | 15,462,811 |  | 15,949    |  | 3,169,923       



41



---

##### Table of Contents

|3. | To approve the amended and restated 2002 Stock Plan.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |                  |  |            |  |           |  |                
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ---------- |  | --------- |  | ---------------
|                                      |  | Number of Shares
|                                      |  | For              |  | Against    |  | Abstained |  | BrokerNon-Votes
|Amended and restated 2002 Stock Plan* |  | 12,125,133       |  | 15,316,539 |  | 20,108    |  | 3,169,923      



|4. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2004.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          |  |                  |  |         |  |           |  |                
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------- |  | --------- |  | ---------------
|                                                          |  | Number of Shares
|                                                          |  | For              |  | Against |  | Abstained |  | BrokerNon-Votes
|Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |  | 30,037,972       |  | 581,861 |  | 11,870    |  |               

---

|* | These resolutions did not get the requisite shareholder approval. Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Item 5. Other Information



None.



Item 6. Exhibits and Reports On Form 8-K



|     |  |                                                                                             
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(a)  |  | Exhibits:                                                                                   
|     | 
|3.1* |  | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company                                                  
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|     | 
|32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

|* | Incorporated by reference to Advents Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 which was filed on August 9, 2004.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(b)          Reports on
Form 8-K:



The Company filed the following report on Form 8-K
during the three months ended June 30, 2004:



On April 22, 2004, Advent furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K to the SEC including the Companys press release announcing the results of operations for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004.



42



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                      |  |  |  |                       |  |                     |  |                                                                                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 27, 2005 |  |  |  | By:                   |  | /s/ Graham V. Smith
|                      |  |  |  |                       |  |                     |  | Graham V. Smith Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



43