alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R E CONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Galveston County Judge Mark H enry, Galveston County

Commissioner Ryan Dennard, Galveston County Commissioner Joe

Giusti, Galveston County Commissioner Stephen Holmes, and

Galveston County Commissioner Ken Clark, in Their Official

Capacities as the Galveston County Commissioners C ourt

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00 820

- CV

Trial court: 56 th District Court of Galveston County

Date motion filed: February 1 9 , 201 5

Party filing motion: Relators

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny relators ’ motion for en banc

reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ T erry Jennings

Acting for the Court *

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle , and Lloyd; Justice Massengale , joined by Justice Brown,

concurring in denial of en banc reconsideration.

Date: April 1 4 , 2015
# LawOffices ofMorelli& 

# Raval

FredM. Morelli, Jr. October 15, 2013 Richard C. Goodwin 403 W. Galena Blvd., P.O. Box 1416 Aurora, IL 60507-1416 630-892-6665

U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office of Hearings, Attn: Room E-11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 RE: Dennis McGlynn FDMS No. FAA 2013-0615 DearJudge Goodwin, Nischal Raval 

# RECEIVED OCT 2 22013 

# HEARING DOCKET

I am in receipt ofthe notice for direction of future communications. To my knowledge this case has notyet been set; and Iam advising you, Patricia Matthews staff assistant, and all persons on the service list, Iwill be unavailable from October 15, 2013 until November 10, 2013, the lastweek in December, first week in January, and the lastweek in January, first week in February, afterthat I am very much open. Thank you foryour consideration. Sincerely, LAW OFFICES OF MORELLI 

### & RAVAL

Fred M. Morelli, Jr. FMM:mmm Cc: See Service List Patricia Matthews, Staff Assistantvia emailFDMS NO. FAA 2013-0615 (Civil Penalty Action)


### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention : Hearing Docket Clerk , AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building -Suite 2W1000


### ONE COPY Christopher Merrill, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.3 Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles CA 90009-2007 TEL310·725-7105 FAX 310-725-6816 Dennis McGlynn Respondent 659 Dorothy Way Auburn, CA 95603-3862 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) Washington D.C. 20590 TEL 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX 202-366-7536
Complete UAS LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

December 29, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 13598, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2795 under 

Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, Complete UAS LLC (CUAS), seeks to amend exemption No. 13598, Regulatory Docket No. 

FAA–2015–2795; Submitted by AeroUAVs for review June 8 2015 and subsequently granted by the FAA 

on November 16, 2015. 

The original exemption made a request to allow operations of different Airframe models for:

 Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate, construction, and utilities industries 

 Agricultural Surveying and Application 

 sUAS Operator Training 

 Product Demonstrations 

 Research and Development

There have been no changes in the request for exemption from specific regulations or conditions and 

reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

This letter requests the addition of additional Airframe models for commercial use in the 

aforementioned service operations. We are petitioning for exemption to enable AeroUAVs to operate 

additional UAS platforms that have been previously approved by exemption. The Requested UAVs are 

listed in Proprietary/Confidential Appendix A which is filed separately.

All those sUAS all weigh less than 55 lbs, have a built- in capability to limit the height flown above the 

ground, to limit the radius of the distance it flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class B, C and 

D airspace including a no fly zone feature. Each system also has the failsafe function of the autopilot 

system, which means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is lost, 

the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will land safely.

This submission does not include the Operating Manuals for models requested, as they have been 

reviewed by the Administrator in granting previous exemptions. Model specifics are listed in the 

AeroUAVs Operating Manual. Copies of all Operating Manuals for the individual models listed will be 

submitted on request.
Complete UAS LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

Accompanying this submission electronically via e-mail are a copies of the Operations Manual and 

Appendix A submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Regards,

Timothy Ford

President and CEO

Complete UAS LLC

11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353

Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

(314) 397-1110
**Exhibit
      32.2**  **Certification**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Teton Energy Corporation
      (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 to be filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Patrick A. Quinn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





It
      is not
      intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934.








Dated: March
      9,
      2006











/s/
      Patrick A. Quinn


Name:
      Patrick A. Quinn


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer
No. 91-6019.

#### Taylor *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 3, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00620-CV 

RICKEY SHANNON, Appellant 

V. 

SM FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-04422-C 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Goldstein, and Justice Smith 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s June 25, 2021 judgment. We 

questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared the trial court was 

without plenary power to sign the judgment. See State ex rel. Latty v. Owens, 907 

S.W.2d 484, 486 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam) (judgment signed after trial court’s 

plenary power expires is a nullity). At the Court’s request, the parties filed letter 

briefs addressing the Court’s concern. 

The trial court signed a final judgment on January 11, 2021. Appellant filed 

a timely motion for new trial on February 4, 2021. The record before the Court does 

not contain a written order on the motion for new trial. Without having set aside the 
 –2– 

January 11 judgment, the trial court signed another judgment on June 25, 2021. The 

trial court’s plenary power, however, expired on April 16, 2021, 105 days after the 

January 11 judgment. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(e). Thus, the trial court’s June 25 

judgment was a nullity. See Latty, 907 S.W.2d at 486. 

Although appellant filed a letter brief, he failed to address the jurisdictional 

issue. Because the court acted beyond its plenary power in signing the June 25 

judgment, the judgment is void. See id. This leaves the January 11 order as the final 

judgment of the trial court. 

When, as here, a judgment is rendered by a court after its plenary power has 

expired, an appellate court’s jurisdiction is limited to setting aside the judgment and 

dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Latty, 907 S.W.2d at 486. 

Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s June 25, 2021 judgment and dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Latty, 907 S.W.2d at 486. 

210620F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICKEY SHANNON, Appellant 

No. 05-21-00620-CV V. 

SM FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-04422-

C. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Goldstein and Smith 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial 

court’s June 25, 2021 judgment and DISMISS the appeal. 

 

Judgment entered December 3, 2021 .
D28 

Monday, January 12, 2009 

Daily Digest 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

Routine Proceedings, pages S275–S317 

Measures Introduced: Fourteen bills and one resolution were introduced, as follows: S. 201–214, and 

S. Res. 12. Pages S308–09 

Measures Considered: 

Lands Bill: Senate began consideration of S. 22, 

to designate certain land components of the National 

Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain 

programs and activities in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture, after 

agreeing to the motion to proceed to consideration 

thereto, and taking action on the following amendments proposed thereto: Page S287–99 

Pending: 

Reid Amendment No. 15, to change the enactment date. Page S299 

Reid Amendment No. 16 (to Reid Amendment 

No. 15), of a perfecting nature. Page S299 

Motion to recommit the bill to the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources, with instructions to 

report back forthwith, with Reid Amendment No. 

17, to change the enactment date. Page S299 

Reid Amendment No. 18 (to the instructions of 

the motion to recommit), of a perfecting nature. 

 Page S299 

Reid Amendment No. 19 (to Reid Amendment 

No. 18), of a perfecting nature. Page S299 

A motion was entered to close further debate on 

the bill, and, in accordance with the provisions of 

rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, a 

vote on cloture will occur on Wednesday, January 

14, 2009. Page S299 

A unanimous-consent agreement was reached providing for further consideration of the bill at approximately 11 a.m., on Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 

and that all first-degree amendments be filed at the 

desk by 2:30 p.m., on Tuesday, January 13, 2009. 

 Pages S316–17 

Message from the President: Senate received the 

following message from the President of the United 

States: 

Transmitting, pursuant to law, a report relative to 

the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; 

which was referred to the Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs. (PM–2) Page S304 

Messages from the House: Page S304 

Executive Communications: Pages S304–08 

Petitions and Memorials: Page S308 

Additional Cosponsors: Page S309 

Statements on Introduced Bills/Resolutions: 

 Pages S309–16 

Additional Statements: Pages S303–04 

Amendments Submitted: Page S316 

Adjournment: Senate convened at 2 p.m. and adjourned at 7:09 p.m., until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, January 13, 2009. (For Senate’s program, see the remarks of the Majority Leader in today’s Record on 

pages S316–17.) 

Committee Meetings 

(Committees not listed did not meet) 

No committee meetings were held. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with DIGEST
#### Frank A. Hecht v. Newman G. Hall et al.

1. Broker— *When Entitled to*Commission.—Where a broker procures a satisfactory purchaser, able, willing and ready to carry out the contract, and the trade falls through because of the vendor’s inability to comply with the conditions of the contract, the broker will be entitled to his commission.

Assumpsit, for commission. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard W. Clifford, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 22, 1896.

Statement of the Case.

On January 31,1894, appellant and one Joseph E. Putnam entered into a contract, under seal, whereby the parties mutually agreed to convey certain real estate owned by them respectively.

The agreement of sale is under seal, signed by Joseph E. Putnam and the defendant, dated January 31, 1895; in it Pnt.na.iTi agrees to sell and convey to the defendant by warranty deed, certain property, describing it, and defendant agrees to sell and convey to Putnam by warranty deed certain other property, describing it, the parties mutually agreeing that 'as part and consideration of this agreement, each party is to provide, for the use of the other, proper abstracts of title, the brokerage fees to be paid as follows: Putnam to pay to Hall, Dresser & Co. $1,500; defendant to pay to Hall, Dresser & Co. $2,500. Commissions for the securing of the $41,000 loan to be paid by the party of the first part. Deeds to be passed and contract to be closed within twenty-eight days from date of agreement. Time is declared to be the essence of the contract. Trial by the court without a jury. Finding in favor of plaintiffs, and judgment for $2,500 and costs.

Defendant appeals.

Remy & Mann, attorneys for appellant.

*101Smith, Helmer, Moulton & Price, attorneys for appellees.

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellees procured the making of the written contracts by Putnam, who was able, willing and ready to carry out the same. The trade fell through because of the inability of appellant to obtain a loan of $41,000. Appellant contends that it was known to appellees that the final consummation of the trade depended upon appellant’s ability to make this loan, and that as between appellant and appellees, appellant was to use all reasonable effort to make the loan. The appellant made such effort, and having failed, appellees are not entitled to commissions for having made a sale, because, as he insists, the obtaining of a loan of $41,000 was known by all to be essential to the carrying out of the proposed transaction with Putnam. Appellees do not appear to have undertaken or done the business of negotiating a sale of appellant’s property upon the condition that no commissions for effecting such sale would be paid unless appellant, by procuring a loan of $41,000, was able to carry out his proposed sale.

Appellees did procure a satisfactory purchaser, and the trade fell through because of appellant’s inability to comply with conditions they had agreed to.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Shepard, J¡, dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 67

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
     savings arrangements established by qualified State political 
              subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida (for himself, Mr. Walberg, and Ms. Foxx) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
     savings arrangements established by qualified State political 
              subdivisions for non-governmental employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Savings 
Arrangements Established by Qualified State Political Subdivisions for 
Non-Governmental Employees'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 92639 (December 
20, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army Must Be Ready For Multi-Domain Battle In Pacific 'Tomorrow'

By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.Deputy Editor, Breaking Defense

**To read the full story, click on the link under RELATED MEDIA **

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Army Must Be Ready For Multi-Domain Battle In Pacific 'Tomorrow'

More News
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Christopher G. Payan, certify that:

 

| 1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Emerging Vision, Inc.; |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; 

 

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date:       May 15, 2007 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|

 

 

| /s/ Christopher G. Payan |
|--------------------------|
| Christopher G. Payan     |
| Chief Executive Officer  |

 

 

 

 

1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRAVCO MINING INC. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodney Lozinski, Principle Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.
| |    

RODNEY LOZINSKIRodney LozinskiPrincipal Executive and Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2008
































---