alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DECEMBER TERM, 1827.

#### Thomas D. Watts v. Thomas Scott,

From Orange.

1 he act of 1802, c. 29, regulating the town of Hillsborough, enables the Treasurer of the Corporation to sue, in his o\vn name, for penalties incurred under the by-laws authorised by that act, as well as for those incurred under the act itself.

Tito Plaintiff, as Treasurer of the towu of Hillsbo-rough, warranted (he Defendant for a penalty incurred by the breach of an ordinance, passed by the Commissioners in the year 1822.

In the Superior Court, on the last Circuit, the Plaintiff relied upon the fifth section of the act of 1802, c. 29, entitled “ An act for the better regulation of the town of Hillsborough j” which section is as follows: “Arid be it further enacted, that the Commissioners of said town shall hereafter appoint a Treasurer, who, &c. and it shall be the duty of said Treasurer, in his own name, to sue for arid recover all forfeitures which shall accrue under this, or any other act heretofore passed and in force for the regulation of said town and contended, that under it, he was entitled to maintain the present action in his own name. His honor Judge Strange being of *292a (5i(ferent opinion, nonsuited the Plaintiff who appealed to this Court.

No Counsel appeared for the Plaintiff.

Badger, for the Defendant, submitted the case.

Ham, Judge.

The by-law under which the penalty in question is claimed, is not stated in the case ; but we are told that the Plaintiff founds his right to sue for it, under the 5th section of' the act of 1802, c. 29.. That section declares, that “ it shall be the duty of said Treasurer, in his own name, to sue for and recover all forfeitures which shall accrue *under this or any other act ■heretofore passed.”*

Now the penalty sought to be recovered, is not a penalty accruing for a direct breach of the act itself, as where the Constable refuses to execute a warrant, or process, directed to him from the Magistrate of Police *;*but I think, by a liberal construction, it is a penalty *accruing under the act.*If the Commissioners are authorised to make by laws, (which is not disputed,) no doubt penalties are imposed for a breach of them, and such penalties indirectly accrue finder the provisions of the act which gave the power of imposing them, although they accrued directly under the by-law. No inconvenience can result from this construction of the act. The case is substantially within its meaning. — I therefore think, the nonsuit should be set aside, and a new trial granted.

Per Curiam. — Judgment reversed, and a new trial ' granted.
Exhibit 32.2

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),
Richard P. Powers, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Anesiva, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 12thday of March 2007.



By:

/s/    RICHARD P. POWERSRichard P. Powers Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Anesiva, Inc. and will be retained by Anesiva, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Anesiva, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
EXHIBIT 12.1
AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(Dollars in millions)

|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | ----- | 
|                                           |  | Years
  Ended December 31, |      
|                                           |  |                            |      
|                                           |  | 2006                       |       | 2005 |   | 2004  |  | 2003 |       | 2002 |  
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |  
|Earnings:                                  |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Net income                                 |  | $                          | 622   |      | $ | 415   |  | $    | 234   |      | $ | 260   |  | $ | 228   | 
|Income tax
  provision                     |  |                            | 95    |      |   | 50    |  |      | 75    |      |   | 135   |  |   | 118   | 
|Interest expense                           |  |                            | 1,614 |      |   | 1,141 |  |      | 863   |      |   | 852   |  |   | 916   | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Total earnings
  (a)                       |  | $                          | 2,331 |      | $ | 1,606 |  | $    | 1,172 |      | $ | 1,247 |  | $ | 1,262 | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Fixed charges -
  interest expense (b)     |  | $                          | 1,614 |      | $ | 1,141 |  | $    | 863   |      | $ | 852   |  | $ | 916   | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 
|Ratio of
  earnings to fixed charges (a/b) |  |                            | 1.44  |      |   | 1.41  |  |      | 1.36  |      |   | 1.46  |  |   | 1.38  | 
|                                           |  |                            |       |      |   |       |  |      |       |      |   |       |  |   |       | 

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 18, 2021

No. 04-21-00168-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.R.M., III AND M.R.M., CHILDREN,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01894

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which 

must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R.

JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. On May 18, 2021, appellant filed a “Motion to Unseal Records,” which notes 

that “the last part of the [reporter’s] record states ‘child conference, sealed.’” Appellant requests 

authorization to receive a copy of the “sealed” portion of the record, arguing that she “must be 

able to review the entire reporter’s record in order to appeal the termination order.”

The court hereby requests a response to the motion from the appellee. Any response must be 

filed in this court by May 25, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DOANE
PRODUCTS COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (93)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,614
<PP&E>                                         101,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,455)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,412
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,277
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,728
<SALES>                                        144,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,497
<CGS>                                          119,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1,547
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Guam’s Second Fast Response Cutter Arrives in Apra Harbo

U.S. Coast Guard District 14 Hawaii Pacific

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NitroMed, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth M. Bate,President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

###### (1)                                The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

######  

###### (2)                                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 7, 2008 |                                                                                                                                       |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                       |
|                     | /s/  KENNETH M. BATE                                                                                                                       |
|                     | Kenneth  M. Bate                                                                                                                           |
|                     | President,  Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial   Officer *(Principal Executive Officer and Principal  Financial Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Zion Oil & Gas, Inc.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (File Nos. 333-148982 and 333-164563, including a base prospectus dated April 16, 2010 and a prospectus supplement dated September 29, 2010) on Form S-3 of Zion Oil & Gas, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the balance sheets of Zion Oil & Gas, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and for the period from April 6, 2000 (inception) to December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zion
Oil & Gas, Inc.





Our report dated March 16, 2011 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Zion Oil & Gas Inc. is in the development stage and has no operating revenue, limited capital resources and a loss from operations, all of which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.





/s/ Somekh Chaikin


Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)


A Member of KPMG International





Tel Aviv Israel


March 16, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1382 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1382

To establish requirements and restrictions for the commercial, charter, 
and recreational red snapper fishing seasons in the Gulf of Mexico for 
       the 2017 and 2018 fishing seasons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

 Mr. Weber of Texas (for himself, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, and Mr. 
    Byrne) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish requirements and restrictions for the commercial, charter, 
and recreational red snapper fishing seasons in the Gulf of Mexico for 
       the 2017 and 2018 fishing seasons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Give Our Fishermen Immediate Snapper 
Help Act'' or the ``GOFISH Act''.

SEC. 2. RED SNAPPER FISHING SEASONS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), any fishery management plan under that Act, or any other Federal 
law, for each of the 2017 fishing season and 2018 fishing season--
            (1) the red snapper fishing season for the recreational 
        fishing sector in the Gulf of Mexico--
                    (A) shall be 62 consecutive days in duration; and
                    (B) shall begin on July 1;
            (2) the allocation of red snapper, and the duration of the 
        red snapper fishing season, for the commercial fishing sector 
        in the Gulf of Mexico shall be the same as the allocation and 
        duration, respectively, that applied to such sector for the 
        2016 fishing season;
            (3) the allocation of red snapper, and the duration of the 
        red snapper fishing season, for the charter fishing sector in 
        the Gulf of Mexico may not be less than the allocation and 
        duration that applied to such sector for the 2016 fishing 
        season; and
            (4) the red snapper catch limit and size limit for each 
        such sector shall be no less than the catch limit and size 
        limit, respectively, that applied to such sector for the 2016 
        fishing season.
    (b) Proposed Rule.--The Secretary of Commerce shall issue a 
proposed rule to implement subsection (a) for the 2017 fishing season 
and 2018 fishing season, respectively.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-02095-BKC-TCB.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

Feb. 5, 1982.

*76Gary Zwickel, Lake Worth, Fla., for debt- or.

Robert S. Levy, West Palm Beach, Fla., for Gordon Associates.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Gordon Associates, a creditor in this bankruptcy proceeding, has filed a motion to dismiss this voluntary chapter 7 petition. (C.P.No. 7). The debtor opposes the motion on the ground that the creditor has no standing to challenge the corporation’s bankruptcy petition. (C.P.Nos. 16, 17, 18). The matter was heard on February 2.

The debtor, a corporation, filed its petition on December 17. The commencement of a voluntary case constitutes an order for relief. 11 U.S.C. § 301.

The grounds for dismissal challenge the form and verification of the petition, the authority of Donald Campagna to sign the petition on behalf of the corporation, and the lack of corporate authorization for the filing. The creditor challenges the substance of the petition and the court’s jurisdiction over the corporate debtor by relying on the ground of lack of authorization.

Creditors may not move to vacate a voluntary order for relief because of some irregularity in the meeting authorizing the filing of the petition, or on the ground that it was not authorized by the stockholders or corporate directors. 2 *Collier on Bankruptcy*(15th ed.) ¶ 301.20[3] n. 18.

The Fifth Circuit precedent, which of course I follow, is clear that a creditor lacks standing to oppose an adjudication. The creditor lacks standing whether the grounds assert lack of jurisdiction or irregularity in the substance and procedure of adjudication. *In re Jack Kardow Plumbing Co.,*5 Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 123, 129.

Accordingly, the creditor lacks standing to move for dismissal of this bankruptcy petition. The motion is denied with prejudice.
ex10-1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


This INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT is entered into as of December 31, 2010 by and between AGILITY CAPITAL II, LLC (“Lender”) and ACCELERIZE NEW MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Grantor”).


 


Recitals


 


Lender has agreed to make certain advances of money and to extend certain financial accommodation to Grantor (the “Loans”) in the amounts and manner set forth in that certain Loan Agreement by and between Lender and Grantor (as amended from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) dated on or about the date hereof.  Capitalized terms used herein have the meaning assigned in the Loan Agreement.  Lender is willing to make the credit extensions to Grantor, but only upon the condition, among others, that Grantor shall grant to Lender a security interest in all of Grantor’s right title, and interest in, to and under all of the Collateral whether presently existing or hereafter acquired


 


Now, Therefore, Grantor agrees as follows:


 


Agreement


 


To secure performance of Grantor’s obligations under the Loan Agreement, Grantor grants to Lender a security interest in all of Grantor’s right, title and interest in Grantor’s intellectual property (including without limitation those Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks listed on Exhibits A, B and C hereto), including without limitation all proceeds thereof (such as, by way of example but not by way of limitation, license royalties and proceeds of infringement suits).  This security interest is granted in conjunction with the security interest granted to Lender under the Loan Agreement.  Each right, power and remedy of Lender provided for herein shall not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise by Lender of any or all other rights, powers or remedies.


 


In Witness Whereof, the parties have caused this Intellectual Property Security Agreement to be duly executed as of the first date written above.


 



	
Address of Grantor:

	
ACCELERIZE NEW MEDIA, INC.


	
204 Riverside Ave.


Newport Beach, CA 92663


Attn:  Brian Ross

	
By: /s/ Brian Ross                                                         


 


Title: Chief Executive Officer                                       


	  	  
	
Address of Lender:

	
AGILITY CAPITAL II, LLC


	
812 Anacapa Street, Suite A


Santa Barbara, CA 93101


Attn:  Jeff Carmody

	
By: /s/ Jeff Carmody                                                      


 


Title: Managing Partner                                                











 


  





  











  








EXHIBIT A


 


Copyrights


 



	

Title



	

Registration Number



	

Registration Date




	  	  	  
	  	  	  









 


  





  











  








EXHIBIT B


 


Patents


 



	

Title



	

Serial No./ Patent Number



	

Application No./ Issue Date




	  	  	  
	
Lead generation management system

	
61/301,811

	
02/05/10


	  	  	  
	  	  	  









 


  





  











  








EXHIBIT C


 


Trademarks


 



	
Description

	
Registration No./Issue Date

	
Application  No./Filing Date