alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule 227.3. Transcript of Testimony.

All post-trial motions shall contain a request designating that portion of the record 

to be transcribed in order to enable the court to dispose of the motion. Within ten days 

after the filing of the motion, any other party may file an objection requesting that an 

additional, lesser or different portion of the record be transcribed. If no portion is 

indicated, the transcription of the record shall be deemed unnecessary to the disposition 

of the motion. The trial judge shall promptly decide the objection to the portion of the 

record to be transcribed.

Note: [Pa. R.J.A. 5000.5(a) requires the request to be delivered 

to (1) the reporter, (2) the clerk of the trial court in which the 

proceeding took place or in which the reporter is employed, (3) 

the district court administrator or the administrator’s 

designee, and (4) in the case of an appeal, to the clerk of the 

appellate court. The request for transcription of the record 

may also be made in open court. See Pa. R.J.A. 5000.5(b).

For rules governing transcript fees and their payment, see Pa. 

R.J.A. 5000.6, 5000.7, and 5000.11.]

For rules governing transcript requests, and transcript fees 

and their payment, see Pa.R.J.A. Nos. 4007, 4008, and 4009.

* * *
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mark E. McMillan, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofInsignia Solutions plc;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Dated: May  17, 2004 |
|----------------------|
|                 |   |
|                 | /s/ Mark E.  McMillan |   |
|                 | Mark E.  McMillan |
|                 | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 82-662.

No. 82-703.

#### Middlesex County Utilities Authority *v.*City of New Brunswick et al.; and Borough of Milltown *v.*City of New Brunswick et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 686 F. 2d 120.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Sterett Visits Hong Kong during 7th Fleet Deployment

By MC2 Richard L.J. Gourley, USS Sterett 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka Completes Second COOP Exercise, Expands Scope and Participation

By Brandon Taylor & Lt. j.g. Russell PicoDirector of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs - NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 1061.

*Ginoris Vizcarra*for petitioner.

Reported below: — P. R. —.

#### Union Obreros Cerveceria Corona *v.*Vega.

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.. Certiorari denied. .
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus XUYEN THI VU, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-354-A) Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Xuyen Thi Vu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 5, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 7, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.3d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Xuyen Thi Vu seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Vu , No. CR-95-354-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Chief of Naval Operations Visits Japan, Engages with Sailors and Leadership

Chief of Naval Operations Public Affairs

TOKYO, Japan -- Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday visited Japan, Sept. 23-24, to engage with U.S. Seventh Fleet Sailors as well senior leaders from Japan’s Ministry of Defense and Self-Defense Force.Gilday first visited Fleet Activities Yokosuka where he met with Sailors aboard the guided-missile cruiser USS Shiloh (CG 67) and the U.S. Seventh Fleet flagship USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19).The ship tours provided Gilday the opportunity to hold several small-group discussions with Sailors to listen to their feedback.“It was important to visit Seventh Fleet and engage with our forward-deployed Sailors,” said Gilday. “Meeting with them gives me the opportunity to hear what’s on their minds and see the great work they are doing in this vital region.”Gilday then traveled to Tokyo where he met Japan’s Minister of Defense Taro Kono, Joint Staff Chief of Staff General Koji Yamazaki, and Maritime Chief of Staff Admiral Hiroshi Yamamura.During each engagement, Gilday reaffirmed the U.S. Navy’s commitment to strengthening the U.S. and Japan alliance and maritime partnership.“The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force a key strategic partner and it was important for me to come here and meet with our naval counterparts to discuss areas for continued cooperation,” said Gilday. “I look forward to further collaboration that will help maintain security, stability, and prosperity within this region.”

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Exhibit
21







Subsidiaries
of Wireless Age Communications, Inc.







Prime Wireless
Corporation is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary does business under its
own name.





Prime Battery
Products Limited is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary does business under
its own name.





Wireless Source
Distribution Ltd. is a Saskatchewan corporation. The subsidiary does business
under its own name.





Wireless Age
Communications Ltd. (94% owned by Wireless Age Communications, Inc.) is a
Saskatchewan corporation. The subsidiary does business under its own
name.





DB Sim Holdings
Ltd. is a Saskatchewan corporation and is an inactive subsidiary of the
Company.





1588102 Ontario
Inc. is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary is a special purpose
administrative subsidiary and conducts no operating
businesses.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth P. Wang, Deceased. Ann W. Houck et al., Respondents; Lily Wang et al., Appellants.

[776 NYS2d 486]

Motion by the appellants on appeals from (1) a decision of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated August 8, 2002, (2) an order of the same court dated October 18, 2002, (3) a decree of the same court dated October 18, 2002, and (4) letters testamentary of the same court dated October 25, 2002, to strike the brief of the petitioner-respondent and the respondents-respondents on the ground that it refers to matter dehors the record, and cross motion by the petitioner-respondent and the respondents-respondents to strike the appellants’ brief and reply brief, and to dismiss the appeals on the ground that the brief and the reply brief raise issues that are not properly raised on the appeals. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 12, 2003, the motion and cross motion were referred to the justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereto.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeals, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that footnote 3 on page 30 and footnote 4 on page 35 of the brief of the petitioner-respondent and the respondents-respondents are deemed stricken and have not been considered in the determination of the appeals; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross motion is denied.

The subject footnotes in the brief of the petitioner-respondent and the respondents-respondents (hereinafter the respondents) consist of allegations and/or information relating to other actions allegedly commenced by the parties hereto which are not related to this matter and allegations of the existence of another or different will which is not a part of this record. This information is dehors , the record. Therefore, it would be improper to consider it *(see Matter of Scuderi,*247 AD2d 393 [1998]; *Allstate Ins. Co. v Hertz Corp.,*119 AD2d 612 [1986]).

The appellants’ brief alleges no new facts, but rather, raises legal arguments which could not have been avoided by the respondents if they had been raised in the Surrogate’s Court. Thus, the arguments raised by the appellants may be considered *(see Block v Magee,*146 AD2d 730 [1989]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### Carter’s Executors *v.*Rutland.

Negroes sent with a daughter upon her marriage, or with a son-in-law and daughter, *is prima facie*evidence of a gift; and if the prop- rty remains any length of time with them, very strong proof will be re- • quired to show that only a loan, and not a gift, was intended.

The following facts were stated in this case by the parties as a *case agreed,*and submitted to a jury on the issue *non detinet,*under the direction of the court as to the law.

Facts agreed to, in the case of *Lazarus Carter,*Executor of *Isaac Carter,*v. *Shadrach Rutland,*

*113
      *8/uulrach Rutland*and *Parthena Carter,*daughter of *Isaac Carter,*of Hertford comity, were married the 12th day of November, 1775. About the middle of tiie year *1776,*a negro woman, *Nairn,*with a young child, *Saul,*was sent by *Mr.*Carter, to said *Shadrach*and *Parthena. —Naim’s*issue since is, *Bob, Hastie, Tibbie*and *Lydia.*Some time in the year 1781, said *Shadrach*and *Parthena*were on a visit at *Mr. Carter’s,*and they were directed to take a negro boy, *Peter,*home with them. Again, in the year 1782 or 1783. said *Shadrach*and *Parthena*were on a visit at *Mr. Carter’s,*and they were directed to take a negro girl, *Maggy,*home with *them*— Maggy’s issue is, Homer, *Penny, Violet*and *fFillis.*

*Mrs. Parthena Rutland*died in August, 1788, and *Mr.' Isaac Carter*died the 8th July, 1792.

It was also admitted on the trial, that *Isaac Carter*bad bequeathed these negroes by his last will, to his grandchildren by *Parthena,*and the executor had made the usual demand, and that the Defendant was in possession.

*Per Curiam*

When a man sends property with his daughter upon her marriage, or to his son-in-law and daughter any short time alter the marriage, it is to be, presumed *prima facie,*that the properly is given abso-lately in advancement of bis daughter ; and when the property is permitted to remain in the possession of the son-in-law for a considerable length of time, au in this case, it will he necessary to prove very clearly, that the property was only lent by the father, and that it was expressly and notoriously understood not to be a gift at the time. The peace of families and thesecurify of creditors, are greatly concerned in the law being thus settled_ Every transaction in human life ought to be considered under its ordinary circumstances — these will sufficiently express the intention of the parties, and generally more unequivocally than the, appointed solemnities of the law. This property was given in the usual manner — that is, sent with them on their going to house-keeping, as it is called, or sent to them as soon as the parent could make the necessary arrangements in his farm or family for that purpose.

Under this charge, there was a verdict and judgment for the Defendant.

Note. — Vide Note to *Farrel v. Perry, ante*2.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Secretary Blinken’s Call with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Locsin

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
No. 90-5178.

#### Khan *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0001002396
<NAME>                    Million Dollar Saloon, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                      US Dollars

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                579735
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            900
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                            22436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      685412
<PP&E>                                               3585568
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1648981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2637936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 137996
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                5732
<OTHER-SE>                                           2354960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2637936
<SALES>                                              1166856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1166856
<CGS>                                                 617426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         397372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       163306
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (50575)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   112731
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          112731
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.02


</TABLE>