alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 2, 2015

Mr. William A. Wilburn

Martin Instrument Inc.

12077 Starcrest Drive

San Antonio, TX 78247

Dear Mr. Wilburn:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 8, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Martin Instrument Inc. filed 

in Docket No. FAA−2015−2799, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines Combined Anti-Armor Team Acquire Targets at an Unknown Distance

By 3rd Marine Division  Sgt. Ricky Gomez

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### THOMAS S. DEAVER *vs.*JAMES CARTER’S ADM’R.

On the compromise of a suit, the defendant agreed to pay the fee of the plaintiff’s attorney — neglected to do so, and the plaintiff' was obliged to pay it himself. *Held,*that the statute of limitations did not begin to run against the plaintiff’s claim, until he paid the money, and that it was not necessary to give notice of the payment to the other party to entitle the plaintiff to bring his suit.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Yancy County, Spring Term 1851, his Honor Judge Settle, presiding.

This was assumpsit. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*J. W. Woodfin,*for the plaintiff.

*N. W. Woodfin*and *Gaither,*for the defendant.

Nash, J.

A suit existed between these parties. It was compromised; and one of the conditions was, that Carter should pay the fee of the plaintiff’s attorney, and for which he held the plaintiff’s note. This money Carter neglected to pay, and the plaintiff was obliged to discharge the note. The action is in assumpsit to recover the money so paid. The defendant relied on the Statute of limitations and the want of notice — more than three years having elapsed since the promise was made upon the compromise of the. suit, but less than three years since the payment made bv the plaintiff.

The decision of his Honor, who ruled against the defendants on both points, is correct. The Statute did not begin to run until the plaintiff discharged the note given to his attorney. Before that time, he had, and could have, no cause of action against the defendant. No, notice of the *268payment was necessary. The parties, after the compromise, stood *towards each other*in the relation of principal and surety. The whole of this case is covered by that of *Ponder against these.same defendants,*decided at this Term. In addition to the authorities there cited, may be added, 1 St. N. Pri. 316.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 1.5 Million Pfizer Vaccine Doses, Donated by the United States, Arrive in Thailand

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Thailand

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2119

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor 

Child A.M.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VTT MANAGEMENT INC.; VTT CHARLOTTE LLC; DEBBIE HICKS; 

CHRISTOPHER LOEBSACK; LATONYA CAMERON; BRITTANY BANKS; 

VICTOR JIMENEZ; MECKLENBURG COUNTY; MARTA CARSON, in her 

individual and official capacity; BECKY T. TIN, in her individual and official 

capacity; DONNIE HOOVER, in his individual and official capacity; ELIZABETH 

THORTON TROSCH, in her individual and official capacity; JOHN AND JANE 

DOES, 1 - 30,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00826-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment in favor of Defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f); denying 

McDaniel’s motion for judgment as a matter of law; and denying as moot McDaniel’s

motion for sanctions and motion in limine. 

We review an order granting summary judgment de novo, “drawing reasonable 

inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Butler v. Drive Auto. 

Indus. of Am., Inc., 793 F.3d 404, 407 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

“Summary judgment is proper ‘if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to 

any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’” Id. at 408

(quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). The relevant inquiry is whether the evidence “presents a 

sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that 

one party must prevail as a matter of law.” McAirlaids, Inc. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 

756 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). To survive 

summary judgment, “the nonmoving party must rely on more than conclusory 

allegations, mere speculation, the building of one inference upon another, or the mere 

existence of a scintilla of evidence.” Dash v. Mayweather, 731 F.3d 303, 311 (4th Cir. 

2013). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. McDaniel v. VTT Mgmt. Inc., 
3

No. 3:16-cv-00826-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US Seabee Divers Complete Infrastructure Assessment of Tinian Harbor

By Petty Officer 2nd Class Cole Pielop

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Military Sealift Command’s USNS Pecos Delivers Project Handclasp to Thai Kids

By Grady FontanaMilitary Sealift Command Far East

                SRIRACHA, Thailand  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# ​Joint Readout of Quad Ministerial Meeting

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
No. 86-5980.

#### Creel *v.*Alabama et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### THE STATE vs. DOUGALD MUNROE & AL.

Although a certiorari has once been issued upon a suggestion of a defect in the record, and returned; yet the Court may, upon a further suggestion, a second time or oftener, direct writs of *certiorari*to issue, if it sees reason to think the transcript defective.

The case of the *Slate*v. *Reid,*1 Dev. &,Bat. 389, cited and approyed..

.Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Cumberland County, at the Spring Term, 184S, his Honor Judge Bailey presiding.

The indictment in this casé, was returned to the June term, 1846, of Cumberland County Court, and the defendants, being convicted, appealed to the Superior Court. Upon a suggestion of a diminution of the record, in the latter Court, a writ of *certiorari*was, on motion, ordered to bring up a more perfect transcript. Upon the return of this writ, an affidavit was filed by the prosecutor, alleging the transcript was still defective ¿ whereupon the Court ordered another or *air alias*writ, as it is termed in *259the proceedings, to issue. From this order the defendants were allowed to appeal to this Court.

*Attorney General,*for the State.

*Strange, D. Reid*and *McRae,*for the defendants.

Nash, J.

An appellate Court acts upon the transcript of the record from the Court, granting the appeal, and it is the duty of the Court to have before them a true copy, in order that justice may be done between the parties. Upon its being made to appear that the copy is not a true and full copy, the Court has the power, and it is its duty, to cause a perfect transcript to be filed. This is not denied, but it is said the power of the Court is exhausted by the first order. For this position no reason is or can be assigned. In truth the same reason exists for a second or third *certiorari,*as the first; the duty of the Court to have before them a full copy. The want of truth is the only suggestion that can authorise the Court to require another transcript. If that suggestion be made a second time, or oftener, *and the Court sees reason to think the transcript defective,*it *may*order other writs of *certio-rari*to issue. *State*v. *Reid,*1st Dev. & Bat. 382. The Court, in this case, did see reason to believe that the second transcript was defective, and, in the legitimate exercise of its power, ordered a second *certiorari to*issue. In this we see no error.

Per Curiam, Ordered to be certified accordingly.
#### State, Appellant, vs. Guaranteed Investment Company, Respondent.

*February 3*

May *23, 1916.*

*Petition of Wausau Investment Co., ante,*p. 283, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida county: A. H. Reid, Circuit Judge.

*Continued.*

The *Attorney General*and *J. T.*Dithmar, assistant attorney general, for the appellant.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *L. A. Doolittle.*

Winslow, O. J.

The state brought this action to quiet its title to ninety-one descriptions of land in Oneida county deeded to it October 31, 1901, to form a part of the so-called forest reserve. The defendant owned tax deeds on the lands executed May 21, 1911, based on the tax sale of 1908 for the taxes of 1901. The state claimed that the tax deeds were void because (1) the land was exempt from taxation in the year 1907 by reason' of its transfer to the state, and (2) because of certain irregularities in the tax proceedings.

The trial court held that the land was subject to taxation, but that the tax deeds were void because of defects in the tax proceedings, and adjudged that the defendant release all claim to the lands on condition of the payment by the state within sixty days of the amounts for which the lands were sold with fifteen per cent, interest, and in case of refusal so to do ordered that the complaint be dismissed on the merits.

The defendant is satisfied with the judgment, but the state appeals and makes practically the same contentions as are made in *Petition of Wausau Investment Company, ante,*p. 283, 158 N. W. 81, namely, that the lands were exempt from taxation in 1907 and that in any event the state cannot be required to pay any sum to redeem them.

*293Upon tbe question of exemption tbe case is ruled against tbe state’s contention by tbe decision in tbe case just cited. As to tbe contention tbat tbe state cannot be required to redeem, we tbink it eminently proper tbat tbe legislature be given tbe first opportunity to determine wbat tbe policy of tbe state should be. These lands are a part of tbe lands purchased under tbe forest reserve legislation, as are tbe lands in tbe *Wausau Investment Company*Case, and it seems tbat tbe two cases might very appropriately receive legislative consideration at tbe same time. This appeal will therefore be continued until tbe further order of tbe court in order tbat tbe legislature of 1917 may have opportunity to consider tbe question as to tbe policy of tbe state under such circumstances.

*By the Gourt.*— Action continued until tbe further order of tbe court.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# UK, Japan Medical Staff Saves Life in Yap during Pacific Partnership 2018

By  Petty Officer 1st Class Byron LinderCommander, Logistics Group Western Pacific

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News