alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1011 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1011

 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health and Human Services Hiree 
Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL CONSULTANTS AND FELLOWS FOR THE PUBLIC 
              HEALTH SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 207(f) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 209(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``This subsection and subsection (g) do not authorize the designation, 
appointment, or employment of any special consultant, fellow, or other 
employee by an agency outside of the Department of Health and Human 
Services.''.
    (b) Technical Corrections.--Section 207(h) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 209(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``subsection (f)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (g)''; and
            (2) by striking ``subsection (e)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (f)''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to special consultants, fellows, and other employees appointed 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Dec. 30, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>We are aware of the ballistic missile launches and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launches highlight the destabilizing impact of the DPRK's unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Wyeth (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on February 29, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Bernard Poussot, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: February 29, 2008
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Research conducted by: S. Michele Manning

Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 76

December 5, 1986

Allan J. Hartlein

Chairman, Rules & Regulations Committee

Oklahoma Department of Mines

4040 N. Lincoln, Suite 107

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105

TOPIC: EXPLORATION PERMIT TERMS

INQUIRY: What states, if any, limit the terms of "test burn" permits that allow the removal of 

more than 250 tons of coal?

SEARCH RESULTS: A COALEX search was conducted to determine which states limit the 

term of an exploration permit. Three states were identified as having some type of time limit on 

the term of an exploration permit. 

_____________________________________________________________________________

Alabama's regulations allow the regulatory authority to set the term of an exploration permit. If 

the exploration will involve the removal of more than 250 tons of coal, the permit will be valid 

"for a period determined by the Regulatory Authority". (Alabama Surface Mining Commission 

Rules and Regulations 880-X-8C-.06(3) (1981))

The Alaska regulations allow exploration permits to be issued for a term of two years. These 

permits may be renewed. (11 Alaska Admin. Code 90.165(e) (1983)) Louisiana's regulations set 

an exploration permit term of one year. (Louisiana Surface Mining Regulations 176.2(b) (1983)) 

Mr. Gary Merritt, Director of the Office of Environmental Policy, Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Resources, reported that in Pennsylvania, the term of the permit is set by the 

operator. Thus, is an operator says in his permit application that he will be exploring for six 

months, that will be the term of the permit.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Alabama Surface Mining Commission Rules and Regs., Sec. 880-X-8C-.06(3) (1981). 

B. 11 Alaska Admin. Code Sec. 90.165(e) (1983). 

C. Louisiana Surface Mining Regs., Sec. 176.2(b) (1983).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Martin, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1013]

Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Collins,*203 AD2d 888, *lv denied*84 NY2d 934, 85 NY2d 861). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie Washington, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 333]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered March 17, 1993, convicting defendant, -after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a *503persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly interjected itself into the questioning of two police witnesses and defendant, so as to deny him a fair trial, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, since he failed to make an appropriate objection (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Charleston,*56 NY2d 886), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find that the trial court acted within reasonable limits to clarify confusing questions and testimony and to elicit relevant facts *(People v Yut Wai Tom,*53 NY2d 44, 56-57).

Further without merit is defendant’s argument that the prosecutor improperly violated the trial court’s *Sandoval*ruling, which only permitted questioning of the defendant regarding the fact that he had two prior convictions for attempted robbery in the second degree, and that they were class D violent felonies, unless defendant by his own testimony opened the door, allowing the prosecutor to inquire into the underlying facts and circumstances of the 1980 and 1986 charges. In view of the fact that defendant in his trial testimony raised the issue of false arrest, which was the precise issue he had previously raised in his 1986 trial testimony, we find that the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it permitted the prosecutor to cross-examine defendant about that strikingly similar 1986 testimony. Such testimony was clearly relevant in that it permitted the jury to fairly assess the credibility of defendant’s current false arrest claim.

Finally, we have considered the remaining contentions of defendant and find them to be meritless. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             903,179
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      532,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                        19,211
<INVENTORY>                                        352,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,331,396
<PP&E>                                             478,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                      81,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,252,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              982,048
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            500
<COMMON>                                               286
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,269,228      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,252,062
<SALES>                                            878,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   878,511
<CGS>                                              492,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,607,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   194,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161,566    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (923,443) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       177,178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (746,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (746,265)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.36)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S401]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             SENATOR BIDEN'S FAREWELL SPEECH TO THE SENATE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, Senator Biden is here to give his farewell 
address to the U.S. Senate. Over the many decades he has served in the 
Senate, he has given many speeches in the Senate. We all look forward 
to his final remarks, recognizing the loss of his service in the Senate 
is significant. However, being Vice President, he will still be 
President of the Senate.
  I will always remember Senator Biden telling me, after the time he 
had been selected to be Vice President: I am a Senate guy. I will 
always be a Senate guy.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 15





AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








MidAmerican Energy Company


Des Moines, Iowa





We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited consolidated interim financial information of MidAmerican Energy Company and subsidiaries for the periods ended  March 31, 2011 and 2010, as indicated in our report dated May 6, 2011; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.





We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  March 31, 2011, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153777 on Form S-3.





We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Des Moines, Iowa


May 6, 2011
From: Rogers, Bob

To: Fritchie, Denis

Cc: Holt, Jim

Subject: FW: Preliminary Comments on 1997 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Update

Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:54:26 PM

Attachments: Comment-Prehearing-01302014-Shelby.pdf

Bob Rogers, Manager

Pollution Control

Shelby County Health Department

814 Jefferson Ave.

Memphis TN 38105

(901)222-9599

From: Lakeman, Sean [mailto:Lakeman.Sean@epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:17 AM

To: Rogers, Bob

Cc: Benjamin, Lynorae

Subject: Preliminary Comments on 1997 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Update

Bob, attached you will find our preliminary comments on the 1997 8-hour Ozone

Maintenance Plan Update we discussed on March 5, 2014.  If you have any questions feel

free to contact me.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter M. Caswell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Advent Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Advent Software, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/PETER M. CASWELL                  
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Peter M. Caswell                     
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

I, Irv H. Lichtenwald, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advent
Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/IRV H. LICHTENWALD                                          
| |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Irv H. Lichtenwald                                             
| |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

---

QuickLinks
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on January 31, 2021
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

2
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

3
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

4
17-2144
Tampa Electric Co.
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Closed

5
18-0034
Armstrong Utilities, Inc. d/b/a Armstrong Cable Services
10/15/19
DFR
10/24/19
Closed

6
17-0138
Home Rubber Company, LP
10/22/19
DFR
  11/04/19
Closed

7
18-0970
FreightCar America, Inc.
10/28/19
DFR
11/04/19
Closed

8
18-0758
RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.
10/30/19
DFR
11/01/19
Closed

9
17-1894
Maxim Crane Works
02/06/20
DFR
02/14/20
Closed

10
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

11
19-0593
StormForce of Jacksonville, LLC
06/04/20
DFR
07/28/20
Closed

12
18-0068
Roy Rock, LLC
08/21/20
DFR
08/28/20
Open

13
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

14
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

15
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

16
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

17
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

18
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Open

19
16-1865
AJM Packaging Corporation
10/07/20
DFR
10/14/20
Open

20
19-0723
Midwest Equipment Company
10/23/20
DFR
11/25/20
Open

21
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 
11/18/20
DFR
12/10/20
Open

22 
18-1864
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
12/07/20
DFR
12/23/20
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Joint Task Force-Red Hill Residual Fuel Update
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="adetail" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/NewsArticle">
    <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2024-02-19T18:50:51.5400000" />
    <h1 itemprop="headline">Joint Task Force-Red Hill Residual Fuel Update</h1>
    <p class="info">
        <strong>24-001</strong> |  Feb. 19, 2024
    </p>
    <div class="content">
        
        
        
        <div class="body" itemprop="articleBody">
            <strong>HONOLULU, Hawaii — </strong>
            <p>Joint Task Force-Red Hill (JTF-RH) released an updated dashboard Monday tracking residual fuel removal and key upcoming events. </p>

<p>As of Feb. 19, JTF-RH safely removed 59,117 gallons of residual fuel from the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (RHBFSF). </p>

<p>For more information about JTF-RH, visit pacom.mil/jtf-red-hill/ or download the App by searching for “JTF–Red Hill” in the Apple App store or Google Play store.</p>

        </div>
    </div>

    <ul class="contact">
        
        
        <li><strong>JTF-RH Public Affairs</strong></li>
        
        
        
        <li><strong>Phone:</strong>(808) 501-8320  </li>
        
        
        
        
        <li>JTFRH-PAO@us.navy.mil</li>
        
    </ul>


    
</div>


    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
(September 21, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alan G. Bigwarfe, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 453]

Mercure, J.

*776Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered May 23, 1994, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal trespass in the second degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

Defendant’s criminal conviction arose out of incidents that took place in the early morning hours of March 22, 1993 at the residence of Elmer Ashe and Barbara Ashe, parents of defendant’s girlfriend, Jodie Keech. The Ashes were awakened by the sound of defendant arguing with Keech. When they asked defendant to leave, he responded by pushing, punching and kicking them and by clubbing them with their portable telephone, destroying the telephone in the process.

The primary contention advanced on appeal is that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to support defendant’s conviction of criminal mischief in the fourth degree because it established his clear intent to use the telephone as a weapon and not to damage property of another person (see, Penal Law § 145.00 [1]). We disagree. In our view, testimony concerning defendant’s efforts to prevent the Ashes from summoning help supported a finding that he intentionally disabled the telephone in order to keep them from calling the police. Thus, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and bearing in mind that credibility is a matter to be determined by the trier of fact, we find that "the record contains evidence sufficient in quantity and quality to support the verdictt ]” *(People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, 757, *cert denied*469 US 932).

We have examined defendant’s contention that he was denied the right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 and find it to be without merit (see, *People v Harris,*82 NY2d 409, 413).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 29, 2010
    /s/ Paul McBarronPaul McBarronChief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President, Finance
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-05797,  333-09257, 333-13259,333-27929, 333-69717, 333-91801, 333-53842, 333-102338, 333-117843, 333-117844,and 333-129851) and Form S-3 (Nos. 033-61903, 333-09151 and 333-89836) ofAmerican Science and Engineering, Inc. of our report dated June 12, 2007relating to the financial statements and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K.
| /s/ Vitale, Caturano, and Company, Ltd. |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Boston, MA                              |
| June 12, 2007                           |

 

----