alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Robert John KELLEHER, Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-144-BK-J-GP.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M. D. Florida, Jacksonville Division.

July 28, 1981.

*897Victor E. Raymos, Jacksonville, Fla., for trustee.

Gregory K. Crews, Jacksonville, Fla., for debtor.

ORDER SUSTAINING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor has claimed as exempt his interest in a testamentary trust set up by the last will and testament of Ellen C. Kelleher. The parties have stipulated that the trust is a spendthrift trust.

The Trustee contends that the debtor’s interest in the spendthrift trust may not be claimed as exempt under § 522. He is correct. There is no federal, state, or local law which exempts an interest in a spendthrift trust. However, the Trustee’s victory is a hollow one.

Although the question has not been squarely presented to the Court, it appears that the debtor’s interest in the property claimed as exempt is not property of the estate. Section § 541(c)(2) excepts from the estate interests in spendthrift trusts to the extent their restrictions are enforceable under applicable non-bankruptcy law. Spendthrift trusts are enforced and upheld as valid in Florida. *Waterbary v. Munn,*159 Fla. 754, 32 So.2d 603 (Fla.1947).

Wherefore, the Trustee’s objection is sustained, but in the interest of judicial economy, the Court here states that it would rule that the property is not property of the estate.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**EQUINOXHOLDINGS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Equinox Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | August 15, 2005 |   | By:                           | /s/ Harvey Spevak |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|   |            |   |                          |              |   |
|   |            |   | Harvey Spevak                 |
|   |            |   | Director, President and       |
|   |            |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |            |   | (principal executive officer) |

 

----
STEPHEN V. MANGRUM,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5177

Opinion filed December 28, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Stephen V. Mangrum, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 86-738.

#### Caucus Distributors, Inc., et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Mark E. McMillan, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Insignia Solutions plc;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(a)   all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

1

----

 

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2003       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |
|   | /s/ MARK E.  MCMILLAN    |   |
|   | Mark E.  McMillan        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|        |                          |        |  |  |

 

2

----
No. 91-6222.

#### Daniel *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
To whom it may concern, 

I would like to recommend Paul Eisenhart II for the appointment cif Designated Mechanics.Examiner. I 

have known Paul for about 10 years. We worked together in the past on both reciprocating and turbine 

engine aircraft in Martinsburg, West Virginia. In the years that I have known him, he has demonstrated 

integrity in his work practices, sound judgment in his decision making, and professionalism with the 

customers and his fellow mechanics. 

Paul was always willing to provide assistance, and was willing to learn new skills and procedures. He 

maintained a good attitude and a high level of quality and safety in the work he did on aircraft. It is my 

opinion that because of these characteristics, Paul would be an ideal candidate for the DME. 

Sincerely, 
PIITSBURGH INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS 

P. 0. Box 10897 • Pittsburgh PA 15236-0897 

(412) 346-2100 o (412) 462-9011 o FAX (412) 466-0513 

November 3, 2015 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am pleased to extend this letter of recommendation for Mr. Paul Eisenhart, an instructor here at 

Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics, for a Designated Mechanical Examiner. 

During the time that Mr. Eisenhart has been an instructor, I have been most impressed with his 

ability to handle students and their instruction, while maintaining an outstanding relationship 

with his peers. He has always been firm, fair, using sound judgment, and professionalism. 

Without bias or partiality, he is willing to assist on the proper techniques to perform an approved 

repair. 

I recommend Paul Eisenhart for DME, Designated Mechanical Examiner. 

Yours Truly, 

Bernard Adams 

Campus Director 

Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics 

badams@pia.edu 

412-915-2234
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that an employee’s ‘regular rate’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation 

will not be affected by certain additional payments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

that an employee’s ‘regular rate’ for purposes of calculating overtime compensation will not be affected by certain additional payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Bonus Pro5 tection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULAR RATE FOR OVERTIME PURPOSES. 

7 Section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

8 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1070 IH

1 (1) by inserting before the semicolon at the end 

2 of paragraph (3) the following: ‘‘; or (d) the pay3 ments are made to reward an employee or group of 

4 employees for meeting or exceeding the productivity, 

5 quality, efficiency, or sales goals as specified in a 

6 gainsharing plan, incentive bonus plan, commission 

7 plan, or performance contingent bonus plan’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘A plan described in clause (d) of paragraph (3) shall 

10 be in writing and made available to employees, provided 

11 that the amount of the payments to be made under the 

12 plan be based upon a formula that is stated in the plan, 

13 and be established and maintained in good faith for the 

14 purpose of distributing to employees additional remunera15 tion over and above the wages and salaries that are not 

16 dependent upon the existence of such plan or payments 

17 made pursuant to such plan.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published May 30, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii -- “We are aware of the DPRK’s launch using ballistic missile technology, which, is a brazen violation of multiple unanimous UN Security Council resolutions, raises tensions, and risks destabilizing the security situation in the region and beyond. This launch involved technologies that are directly related to the DPRK intercontinental ballistic missile program. We are assessing the situation in close coordination with our allies and partners. We have assessed that this event did not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel, territory, or that of our allies, but will continue to monitor the situation. The U.S. commitment to homeland defense and the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan, remains ironclad”<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
H. Con. Res. 103 Agreed to February 26, 2018

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF 

REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized 

to be used on April 9, 2018, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. 

Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 

accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol 

may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Maui General Store, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard H. Miller, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The
information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and results of  operations of the Company.

/s/  Richard
H. Miller
Richard H. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 13, 2003

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. and Thai Army Engineers Share Best Practices in Combat Engineering

By Ana Allen, U.S. Army Corps of EngineersPacific Ocean Division

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                          Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                  1,153,193
<SECURITIES>                                                               56,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             920,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                                30,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        2,579,741
<PP&E>                                                                    268,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          5,737,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   1,876,226
<BONDS>                                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                                    4,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              3,100,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            5,737,364
<SALES>                                                                 4,705,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        4,705,033
<CGS>                                                                   2,182,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           2,182,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        2,272,438  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           256,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              128,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       128,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              128,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                 .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 .03
        

</TABLE>
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 110/09/2008 15:27:36

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Three Mile Island 1 Docket (050- 00289)

Communication / IR161 - Communication LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

17

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Fitness for Duty / IR122 - Behavioral observation LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

129 - Impairment O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

213

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR141 - Problem not properly classified or prioritized G - Engineering G - Design 

142 - Operating experience (OE) review LTA G - Engineering G - Design 148 - Action not yet started or untimely G - Engineering M - Maintenance / Repair 148 - Action not yet started or untimely H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

427

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering D - Emergency Drill 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA O - Operations T - Testing 

853

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 15
AFS-13-470-E

August 28, 2013

 Exemption No. 10858

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0652

Mrs. Christy Keating

Parent of Karis Keating

427 Kimmel Dr.

Cedar Hill, TX 75104

Dear Mrs. Keating:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received July 18, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Karis Keating for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Karis to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Karis.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No. 9834.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Karis Keating an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Karis is aboard 

its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow

him to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Karis’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Karis Keating may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Karis’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure