### 64150 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices

TABLE

### —D RAFT 

### R ISK 

### ASSESSMENTS 

### B EING 

### M ADE 

### AVAILABLE FOR 

### P UBLIC 

### COMMENT

Registration review case name (and case No.) Docket ID No. Chemical review manager, email address, and telephone No.

Carfentrazone-ethyl (7422) ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0815 ............................. Matthew Manupella, manupella.matthew@
epa.gov, (703) 347–0411. Copper Compounds: Copper sulfate (0636),

Copper compound group II (0649), Copper salts (4026), Copper and Oxides (4025). EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0212 ............................. Jordan Page, page.jordan@epa.gov, (703) 347–0467 Stephen Savage, savage.stephen@epa.gov, (703) 347–0345. Mineral Acids (4064) .......................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0766 ............................. Stephen Savage, savage.stephen@epa.gov, (703) 347–0345 Matthew Manupella, manupella.matthew@epa.gov, (703) 347– 0411. Spinosad (7421) ................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0667 ............................. Roy Johnson, johnson.roy@epa.gov, (703) 347–0492. Spinetoram (7448) .............................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0666 ............................. Roy Johnson johnson.roy@epa.gov, (703) 347–0492

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice of availability, for interested parties to provide comments and input concerning the Agency’s draft human health and/or ecological risk assessments for the chemicals listed in the Table in this Unit. Such comments and input could address, among other things, the Agency’s risk assessment methodologies and assumptions, as applied to these draft risk assessments. The Agency will consider all comments received during the public comment period and make changes, as appropriate, to the draft ecological and/ or human health risk assessments. EPA will then issue revised risk assessments, explain any changes to the draft risk assessments, and respond to comments. In the Federal Register notice announcing the availability of the revised risk assessments, if the revised risk assessment indicates risks of concern, the Agency may provide a comment period for the public to submit suggestions for mitigating the risk identified in the revised risk assessment before developing proposed registration review decisions for the chemicals listed in the Table in this Unit.

1. Other related information. Additional information on the registration review status of the chemicals listed in the Table in this Unit, as well as information on the Agency’s registration review program and on its implementing regulation is available at https://www.epa.gov/ pesticide-reevaluation.

2. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or information in response to this document. To be considered during a pesticide’s registration review, the submitted data or information must meet the following requirements:

• To ensure that EPA will consider data or information submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider data or information submitted at a later date.

• The data or information submitted must be presented in a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or electronic form.

• Submitters must clearly identify the source of any submitted data or information.

• Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider the data or information in the pesticide’s registration review.

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions required in the final decision on the registration review case have been completed.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. Dated: September 9, 2016. Yu-Ting Guilaran, Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016–22506 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL–9952–58–OA]**

**National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of advisory committee teleconference.

**SUMMARY :**  Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, EPA gives notice of a public meeting of the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to the EPA Administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, technology, and management issues. NACEPT members represent academia, industry, non-governmental organizations, and state, local and tribal governments. The purpose of this meeting is for NACEPT to discuss the Council’s draft report regarding actions that EPA should take in response to technological and sociological developments in the area of citizen science. A copy of the meeting agenda will be posted at http:// www2.epa.gov/faca/nacept

. **DATES :**  NACEPT will hold a public teleconference on October 17, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EDT).

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the EPA Headquarters, William Jefferson Clinton Federal Building East, Room 1132, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Eugene Green, Designated Federal Officer, green.eugene@epa.gov, (202) 564–2432, U.S. EPA, Office of Resources, Operations and Management; Federal Advisory Committee Management Division (MC1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.


### 64151 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Requests to make oral comments or to provide written comments to NACEPT should be sent to Eugene Green at green.eugene@
epa.gov by October 10, 2016. The teleconference is open to the public,with limited seating available on a firstcome, first-served basis. Members of the public wishing to participate in the teleconference should contact Eugene Green via email or calling (202) 564– 2432 no later than October 10, 2016.

Meeting Access: Information regarding accessibility and/or accommodations for individuals with disabilities should be directed to Eugene Green at the email address or phone number listed above. To ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for accommodations at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

Dated: September 7, 2016. Eugene Green, Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–22479 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0404; FRL–9952–57– OW]** 

**Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Proposed Information**  **Collection Request for the National Study of Nutrient Removal and**  **Secondary Technologies: Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)**  **Screener Questionnaire**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an information collection request (ICR) for a mandatory survey, ‘‘Proposed Information Collection Request for the National Study of Nutrient Removal and Secondary Technologies: Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) Screener Questionnaire’’ (EPA ICR No. 2553.01, OMB Control No. 2040–NEW). Before submitting the ICR to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. **DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before November 18, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OW–2016–0404 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by email to OW-Docket@
epa.gov, Attention Docket ID No. EPA– HQ–OW–2016–0404, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2016– 0404. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment along with any disk you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Dr. Paul Shriner, Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202–566–1076; email address: nutrient-removal-study@
epa.gov

.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?

EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA— EPA–HQ–OW–2016–0404, which is available at https:// www.regulations.gov, or for in person viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202)
566–2426.

Use https://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information supporting statement, obtain a draft of the screener, review the draft mailing list of screener respondents, submit or view public comments, view the index listing of the contents of the docket, and access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. What information is EPA particularly interested in?

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it
to:

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) Enhance the accuracy, quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology ( e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses). In particular, EPA is requesting comments from small POTWs (those that service a population of less than 50,000) on examples of specific additional ways EPA can reduce the paperwork burden on small facilities.