52080 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

orange handlers and producers may be 

classified as small entities. 

This rule continues in effect the 

changes that relaxed the size and grade 

requirements prescribed under the 

order. These changes allow additional 

late season fruit to be shipped to the 

fresh market, maximizing shipments 

and providing additional returns to both 

handlers and growers. This rule revises 

the provisions of section 905.306 by 

lowering the minimum size for 

interstate shipments of fresh Valencia 

and other late type oranges from 28⁄16

inches to 24⁄16 inches from May 15 to 

August 31 each season. This rule further 

revises section 905.306 by lowering the 

minimum grade for interstate shipments 

of Valencia and other late type oranges 

from a U.S. No. 1 to a U.S. No. 1 Golden 

from May 15, 2013, to June 14, 2013, 

and to a U.S. No. 2 external/U.S. No. 1 

internal from June 15, 2013, to August 

31, 2013. Authority for these changes is 

provided for in section 905.52. 

This action does not impose any 

additional costs on the industry. 

However, it is anticipated that this 

action will have a beneficial impact. 

Relaxing size and grade requirements 

for Valencia and other late type oranges 

from May 15 to August 31 will make 

additional fruit available for shipment 

to the fresh market, providing the 

opportunity to supply the potential food 

service industry market. The Committee 

believes that relaxing the size and grade 

requirements provides an outlet for fruit 

that may otherwise go un-harvested. 

This action allows more fruit to be 

shipped to the fresh market and 

increases returns to both handlers and 

growers. The benefits of this rule are 

expected to be equally available to all 

fresh citrus growers and handlers, 

regardless of their size. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the order’s information 

collection requirements have been 

previously approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) and 

assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic 

Fruit Crops. No changes in those 

requirements as a result of this action 

are necessary. Should any changes 

become necessary, they would be 

submitted to OMB for approval. 

This rule will not impose any 

additional reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements on either small or large 

Florida citrus handlers. As with all 

Federal marketing order programs, 

reports and forms are periodically 

reviewed to reduce information 

requirements and duplication by 

industry and public sector agencies. In 

addition, USDA has not identified any 

relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 

overlap, or conflict with this rule. 

Further, the Committee meeting was 

widely publicized throughout the 

Florida citrus industry. All interested 

persons were invited to attend the 

meeting and participate in Committee 

deliberations. Like all Committee 

meetings, the January 8, 2013, meeting 

was a public meeting. All entities, both 

large and small, were able to express 

their views on this issue. 

Comments on the interim rule were 

required to be received on or before July 

15, 2013. One comment in favor of the 

action was received. Therefore, for the 

reasons given in the interim rule, we are 

adopting the interim rule as a final rule, 

without change. 

To view the interim rule, go to: 

http://www.regulations.gov/ 

#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-13-0009- 

0001. 

This action also affirms information 

contained in the interim rule concerning 

Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 

U.S.C. 101). 

After consideration of all relevant 

material presented, it is found that 

finalizing the interim rule, without 

change, as published in the Federal 

Register (78 FR 28115, May 14, 2013) 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905 

Grapefruit, Marketing agreements, 

Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Tangelos, Tangerines. 

Accordingly, the interim rule that 

amended 7 CFR part 905, which was 

published at 78 FR 28115 on May 14, 

2013, is adopted as a final rule, without 

change. 

Dated: August 16, 2013. 

Rex A. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20479 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 1207 

[Document Number AMS–FV–13–0027] 

Potato Research and Promotion Plan; 

Amend the Administrative Committee 

Structure and Delete the Board’s 

Mailing Address 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule amends the 

structure of the Administrative 

Committee (Committee) of the U.S. 

Potato Board (Board) and deletes the 

Board’s mailing address from the Potato 

Research and Promotion Plan. The Plan 

is administered by the Board with 

oversight by the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture (USDA). Under the Plan, 

there are seven Committee ViceChairperson positions. The Board has 

recommended that these positions be 

increased to nine. This change is 

intended to facilitate increased 

involvement in the Board’s leadership 

opportunities. Further, the Board’s 

office has been relocated and the 

address must be changed in the 

regulations. The deletion of the Board’s 

mailing address from the regulations 

will require no further amendment to 

the regulations if the Board’s office is 

relocated again. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia A. Petrella, Marketing 

Specialist, Promotion and Economics 

Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244, 

Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone: 

(301) 334–2891; toll free (888) 720– 

9917; facsimile (202) 205–2800; or 

electronic mail: Patricia.Petrella@

ams.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

is issued under the Potato Research and 

Promotion Plan (Plan) (7 CFR part 

1207). The Plan is authorized under the 

Potato Research and Promotion Act 

(Act) (7 U.S.C. 2611–2627). 

Executive Order 12866 and Executive 

Order 13563 

Executive Order 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has been designated as ‘‘non-significant 

regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has waived the review process. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 52081 

Executive Order 12988 

This rule has been reviewed under 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. It is not intended to have 

retroactive effect. 

The Act provides that administrative 

proceedings must be exhausted before 

parties may file suit in court. Under 

section 311 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2620), 

a person subject to a plan may file a 

petition with USDA stating that such 

plan, any provision of such plan, or any 

obligation imposed in connection with 

such plan, is not in accordance with law 

and request a modification of such plan 

or to be exempted therefrom. Such 

person is afforded the opportunity for a 

hearing on the petition. After the 

hearing, USDA would rule on the 

petition. The Act provides that the 

district court of the United States in any 

district in which such person is an 

inhabitant, or has his or her principal 

place of business, has jurisdiction to 

review USDA’s ruling on the petition, 

provided that a complaint is filed not 

later than 20 days after date of the entry 

of the ruling. 

Background 

This rule amends the structure of the 

Committee of the Board and deletes the 

Board’s mailing address from the 

regulations. The Plan is administered by 

the Board with oversight by USDA. 

Under the Plan, assessments are 

collected from handlers and importers 

and used for projects to promote 

potatoes and potato products. 

This rule modifies the structure of the 

Board’s Administrative Committee as 

prescribed in the Plan by increasing the 

number of Vice-Chairperson positions 

on the Committee from seven to nine. 

These additional positions would be 

allocated, as provided in the Board’s 

bylaws, to the Northwest and North 

Central caucuses. The Northwest district 

includes Alaska, Idaho, Montana, 

Oregon and Washington. The North 

Central district includes Illinois, 

Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, 

Minnesota, North Dakota, Ohio, South 

Dakota, and Wisconsin. With this 

action, Board representation at the 

executive level for potato producers in 

the Northwest district increases from 

28.5 percent to 33 percent and in the 

North Central district from 14 percent to 

22 percent. 

Section 1207.327(b) of the regulations 

provides the authority to the Board to 

make rules and regulations, with USDA 

approval, to effectuate the terms and 

conditions of the Plan. Section 

1207.328(a) of the Plan provides the 

authority to the Board to select from its 

members such officers as may be 

necessary and to adopt such rules for 

the conduct of its business as the Board 

may deem advisable. 

Section 1207.507(a) of the Plan’s 

administrative rules delineates the 

structure of the Board’s Administrative 

Committee. The Committee is selected 

from among Board members, and is 

composed mostly of producer members, 

with one or more importer member(s), 

and the public member. The Board, 

through the adoption of its bylaws, may 

prescribe the manner of selection and 

the number of members; except that the 

regulations mandate that the Committee 

shall include a Chairperson and a fixed 

number of Vice-Chairpersons. The 

change is intended to facilitate 

increased involvement in the Board’s 

leadership opportunities from the 

Northwest and North Central caucuses 

and possibly increase diversity at higher 

positions on the Board. 

Prior to this change, the Plan 

provided for seven Vice-Chairperson 

positions on the Committee. ViceChairperson positions are allocated in 

the Board’s bylaws to represent 

production districts as determined by 

the Board. This action increases the 

number of Vice-Chairperson positions to 

nine. The additional Vice-Chairpersons 

would be allocated to the Northwest and 

North Central caucuses, which 

historically have been the caucuses with 

the greatest production. 

The second change will delete the 

Board’s mailing address from the Plan’s 

rules and regulations. Section 1207.501 

of the Plan specifies that all 

communications in connection with the 

Plan shall be addressed to: National 

Potato Promotion Board, 7555 East 

Hampden Avenue, Suite 412, Denver, 

Colorado, 80231. The Board moved to a 

new location within Denver, Colorado. 

Therefore, this section would need to be 

amended. However, USDA is 

recommending that this section be 

deleted so no further amendment would 

be required if the Board moves its office 

in the future. Interested persons wanting 

to contact the Board can reach them 

through their Web site, Facebook, or 

smartphone application. 

Board Recommendation 

The Board met on March 14, 2013, 

and unanimously recommended 

amending the Committee structure of 

the Board and amending the Board’s 

mailing address from the Plan. This 

action would contribute to effective 

administration of the program. 

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Analysis 

In accordance with the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601– 

612), AMS is required to examine the 

impact of the rule on small entities. 

Accordingly, AMS has considered the 

economic impact of this action on small 

entities. 

According to the Board, it is estimated 

that in 2013 there are about 2,500 

producers, 1,030 handlers and 240 

importers of potatoes and potato 

products who are subject to the 

provisions of the Plan. 

The purpose of the RFA is to fit 

regulatory actions to the scale of 

businesses subject to such actions so 

that small businesses will not be 

disproportionately burdened. The Small 

Business Administration defines, in 13 

CFR Part 121, small agricultural 

producers as those having annual 

receipts of no more than $750,000 and 

small agricultural service firms 

(domestic handlers and importers) as 

those having annual receipts of no more 

than $7.0 million. Under these 

definitions, the majority of the handlers, 

producers and importers that would be 

affected by this rule would be 

considered small entities. 

This rule amends the structure of the 

Administrative Committee of the Board 

and deletes the Board’s mailing address 

from the regulations. The Plan is 

administered by the Board with 

oversight by the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture (USDA). As provided for in 

the regulations, there are seven 

Committee Vice-Chairperson positions. 

The Board has recommended that these 

positions be increased to nine ViceChairpersons. This change is intended 

to facilitate increased involvement in 

the Board’s leadership opportunities. 

The deletion of the Board’s mailing 

address will require no further 

amendment to the regulations if the 

Board’s office is relocated. The Board’s 

office is being relocated without the 

amendment to the regulations made in 

this final rule. A change to the 

regulations would be necessary. 

This rule will amend section 

1207.507(a) of the regulations by 

changing the number of ViceChairperson positions from seven to 

nine. Also, the Board’s office address 

will be removed from § 1207.501 of the 

regulations. 

Regarding the economic impact of this 

rule on affected entities, this action will 

impose no costs on producers, handlers, 

and importers as a result of this action. 

Both changes are administrative in 

nature; it would merely provide 

additional opportunities for increased 

involvement by producers in the 

Board’s leadership opportunities from 

the larger production areas. 

Regarding alternatives, one option to 

the action would be to maintain the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
52082 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

status quo and not change the 

Administrative Committee structure. 

This will not alleviate the concerns 

voiced by the Northwest and North 

Central caucuses for more 

representation and leadership 

opportunities. The Board also 

considered combining the Southwest 

caucus into the Northwest caucus. The 

Board concluded that this would cause 

the Southwest producers to lose their 

representation as there are more 

Northwest producers and the available 

seats could possibly be absorbed by all 

Northwest producers. Therefore, the 

recommendation was approved, as it 

will allow greater opportunity for 

producers from the Board’s two largest 

caucus districts to become engaged in 

the Board’s leadership structure. This 

action will also make the representation 

on the Board more equitable according 

to production. 

A proposed rule concerning this 

action was published in the Federal 

Register on June 28, 2013 (78 FR 38846). 

The proposal was made available 

through the Internet by USDA, the 

Office of the Federal Register, and the 

Board. A 15-day comment period 

ending July 15, 2013, was provided to 

allow interested persons to submit 

comments. 

Analysis of Comment 

One comment was received in 

response to the proposed rule. The 

comment is addressed in the following 

paragraphs. The commenter raised a 

number of issues concerning the need 

for the program to spend American tax 

dollars and that another Federal 

bureaucracy is unnecessary; retaining 

the Board’s address in the regulatory 

text; decreasing the number of ViceChairpersons to five; and conducting 

meetings by video or webinar. 

One issue that the commenter raised 

was that there is no need for the 

program to spend American tax dollars 

and that another Federal bureaucracy is 

unnecessary. The program is paid for by 

the potato industry through assessments 

on domestic handlers and importers. 

Research and promotion programs 

overseen by USDA are self-help 

programs funded by their respective 

industry and do not receive taxpayer 

funds. The Potato Research and 

Promotion Program authorized by the 

Potato Research and Promotion Act and 

the Potato Research and Promotion Plan 

itself was established in March 1972. 

Another issue stated by the 

commenter was that the Board’s address 

should be retained in the regulatory 

text. The deletion of the Board’s mailing 

address from the regulatory text will 

require no further amendments to the 

regulations. The Board can easily be 

contacted by using their Web site, 

Facebook or smartphone application. 

Further, the Board’s Web site in 

addition to the USDA Web site contain 

the Board’s address. In addition, 

deleting the address is a cost savings 

measure to the potato industry since no 

further rulemaking will be necessary if 

the Board moves its offices in the future. 

The commenter also recommended 

that the Vice-Chairpersons should be 

decreased to five instead of nine as 

proposed by the Board. The Board 

recommended this change and 

discussed it thoroughly at various 

meetings. The change will facilitate 

increased involvement in the Board’s 

leadership opportunities from the 

Northwest and North Central caucuses 

and possibly increase diversity at higher 

positions on the Board. Decreasing the 

number of Vice-Chairpersons on the 

Board would not accomplish the intent 

of the change. 

Finally, the commenter commented 

that Board meetings should be on the 

web and videoed for the public to view. 

The Board meets in person once a year 

and the Administrative Committee 

meets three times a year. During certain 

circumstances committees will meet by 

teleconference. All meetings of the 

Board are open to the public and 

minutes of all the meetings are 

available. Accordingly, based upon our 

consideration of the comment received 

no changes have been made to the 

regulatory text. 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35), the information collection 

and recordkeeping requirements that are 

imposed by the Order have been 

approved previously under OMB 

control number 0581–0093. This rule 

will not result in a change to the 

information collection and 

recordkeeping requirements previously 

approved and will impose no additional 

reporting and recordkeeping burden on 

potato producers, handlers, and 

importers. 

As with all Federal promotion 

programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce 

information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public 

sector agencies. Finally, USDA has not 

identified any relevant Federal rules 

that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with 

this rule. 

AMS is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the Internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

Regarding outreach efforts, this action 

was discussed by the Board at meetings 

over the past year. Board members 

discussed the changes with their 

respective regions and received positive 

feedback. The Board met in March 2013 

and unanimously made its 

recommendation. All of the Board’s 

meetings, including meetings held via 

teleconference, are open to the public 

and interested persons are invited to 

participate and express their views. 

After consideration of all relevant 

matters presented, including the 

information and recommendation 

submitted by the Board and other 

available information, it is hereby found 

that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, 

will tend to effectuate the declared 

policy of the Act. 

It is further found that good cause 

exists for not postponing the effective 

date of this rule until 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register (5 

U.S.C. 553) because the Administrative 

Committee is meeting on October 21, 

2013, and it would be appropriate that 

the additional Vice-Chairpersons should 

be able to participate in those meetings. 

In addition, the Board’s office has 

already relocated so the address needs 

to be deleted promptly. Further, 

handlers, producers and importers are 

aware of this rule, which was 

recommended at a public meeting. Also, 

a 15-day comment period was provided 

for in the proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1207 

Advertising, Agricultural research, 

Imports, Potatoes, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 7 CFR part 1207 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 1207—POTATO RESEARCH 

AND PROMOTION PLAN 

■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 

part 1207 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2611–2627 and 7 

U.S.C. 7401. 

§ 1207.507 [Removed and Reserved] 

■ 2. Section 1207.501 is removed and 

reserved. 

■ 3. Section 1207.507(a) is revised to 

read as follows: 

§ 1207.507 Administrative Committee. 

(a) The Board shall annually select 

from among its members an 

Administrative Committee composed of 

producer members as provided for in 

the Board’s bylaws, one or more 

importer members, and the public 

member. Selection shall be made in 

such manner as the Board may 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 52083 

prescribe: Except that such committee 

shall include the Chairperson and nine 

Vice-Chairpersons, one of whom shall 

also serve as the Secretary and Treasurer 

of the Board. 

* * * * * 

Dated: August 16, 2013. 

Rex A. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20489 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0267; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASW–2] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Fort 

Polk, LA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

airspace at Fort Polk, LA. Additional 

controlled airspace is necessary to 

accommodate new Area Navigation 

(RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures at Polk Army Airfield 

(AAF). The airport’s geographic 

coordinates are also adjusted. This 

action enhances the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rule 

(IFR) operations at the airport. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

December 12, 2013. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321– 

7716. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On April 30, 2013, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 

Class E airspace for the Fort Polk, LA, 

area, creating additional controlled 

airspace at Polk AAF (77 FR 25228) 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0267. Interested 

parties were invited to participate in 

this rulemaking effort by submitting 

written comments on the proposal to the 

FAA. No comments were received. Class 

E airspace designations are published in 

paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9W 

dated August 8, 2012, and effective 

September 15, 2012, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by 

amending Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

to accommodate new standard 

instrument approach procedures at Polk 

AAF, Fort Polk, LA. A small segment 

extends from the current 7.6-mile radius 

of the airport to 20.2 miles north of the 

airport to provide adequate controlled 

airspace for the safety and management 

of IFR operations at the airport. 

Geographic coordinates are also be 

updated to coincide with the FAA’s 

aeronautical database. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends 

controlled airspace at Polk AAF, Fort 

Polk, LA. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 8, 2012, and 

effective September 15, 2012, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface 

* * * * * 

ASW LA E5 Fort Polk, LA [Amended] 

Fort Polk, Polk AAF, LA 

(Lat. 31°02′41′′ N., long. 93°11′30′′ W.) 

Polk VORTAC 

(Lat. 31°06′42′′ N., long. 93°13′04′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7.6-mile 

radius of Polk AAF, and within 8 miles west 

and 4 miles east of each side of the 340° 

radial from the Polk VORTAC extending from 

the 7.6-mile radius to 20.2 miles north of the 

airport, excluding that airspace within 

restricted areas R–3803A, R–3804A, and R– 

3804B. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 12, 

2013. 

David P. Medina, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20379 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES