alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Westell
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Nicholas C. Hindman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Nicholas C. Hindman
Nicholas C. Hindman
Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2003
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all                the                Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | */s/                Rodney Lozinski*                                              |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Rodney                Lozinski                                                    |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |
|   | October                24th,                2005                                  |

----
Document

Exhibit 10.2
FORM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) by and between EastGroup Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and ____________ (the “Executive”) is effective as of ________ __, 2020.  
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a Severance and Change in Control Agreement dated as ___________ (the “Severance Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend certain provisions of the Severance Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, for good and valuable consideration and intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
1.Section 6(b) of the Severance Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“(b)    A lump sum severance payment in an amount equal to the product of 2.5 times the Executive’s Average Annual Compensation as of the Change in Control; and”


2.Except as so amended, the Severance Agreement is in all other respects hereby confirmed and defined terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Severance Agreement.


3.This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


[Signature Page Follows] 













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has set his or her hand to this Amendment and, pursuant to the authorization from the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.




By:___________________________________ 
                                                                                     Name:     
                                                                                     Title:    


By:___________________________________ 
                                                                                      Name:     
                                                                                      Title:    






EXECUTIVE




______________________________________ 
                                                                              Name:


Address:    


[Signature Page to the First Amendment to the Severance and Change in Control Agreement]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7847

KIMBERLY D. RATLIFFE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus POCAHONTAS CORRECTIONAL UNIT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00668-jct) Submitted: May 2, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kimberly D. Ratliffe, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kimberly D. Ratliffe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ratliffe has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout of 16th U.S.-India Military Cooperation Group

By Maj. Cassandra GeseckiU.S. Pacific Command

**CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii – **On Nov. 28-29, Deputy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command Lt. Gen. Bryan Fenton met with Indian Chief of Integrated Defense Staff, Lt. Gen. Satish Dua during the 16th Military Cooperation Group (MCG) at Camp H. M. Smith, Hawaii. Lt. Gen. Fenton and Lt. Gen. Dua co-chaired the event.

Both sides agreed to plan a joint service amphibious humanitarian assistance/disaster relief exercise in 2018 and a joint service counter terrorism exercise in 2019, involving a theoretical scenario to support a third country in the Indo-Pacific under a United Nations mandate.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<PAGE>

CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC
EXHIBITS - Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited).

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              Cingular Wireless LLC
          Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)
                              (Dollars in Millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Period from                Year Ended December 31,
                                           April 24, 2000 -            -----------------------
                                          December 31, 2000     2001            2002            2003
                                          -----------------  ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                       <C>                <C>             <C>             <C>
FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense                             $      231      $      822      $      911      $      856
Interest capitalized during
       the period                                     2              16              27              15
Amortization of debt issuance
       expenses                                      --              --              --              --
Portion of rental expense
       representative of interest                    27             135             152             163
                                             ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

             Total Fixed Charges                    260             973           1,090           1,034

EARNINGS
Income (loss) from continuing
       operations before income taxes               128           1,700           1,251           1,050
Add (deduct) the following:
       Amortization of capitalized
             interest                                --              --              --              --
                                             ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

             Subtotal                               128           1,700           1,251           1,050

Fixed charges per above                             260             973           1,090           1,034
Less interest capitalized during
       the period                                    (2)            (16)            (27)            (15)
                                             ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------

Total earnings                               $      386      $    2,657      $    2,314    $      2,069
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 1.49            2.73            2.12            2.00
=======================================================================================================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jens H. Mortensen, President of the Company, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allis-Chalmers
Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

DATE: APRIL 14, 2004 BY:                /S/ JENS H. MORTENSEN
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        JENS H. MORTENSEN
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS America Returns to Singapore

By Courtesy StoryLogistics Group Western Pacific

                SINGAPORE  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928420
<NAME> Cohesant Technologies Inc. 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                          54,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,283,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,711
<INVENTORY>                                  2,983,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,787,069
<PP&E>                                       1,097,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 478,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,759,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,636,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,688,343
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,450,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,759,358
<SALES>                                      3,181,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,181,190
<CGS>                                        1,819,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,013,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (30,919)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                177,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            177,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
#### Doe ex dem. of Hosea Galloway et al. v. Roe & Peter Yates,

From Beaufort.

The probate of a will, under the act of 1784, sec. *5,*is good, if the place of its deposit be proved by one witness only.

Ejectment, tried before Donneel, Judge, on the last Fall Circuit. The lessors of the Plaintiff claimed by descent from *Thomas Fates;*the Defendant, as bis devisee, and the only question was, whether the will was properly proved. *297The Jury returned a special verdict, the malerial fact of whidi was, the probate of f!¿e will of *Thomas Fates,*which was as follows: *“Michael Hill, George Hill, “*and *Terence Delaney,*being introduced to prove the *“*same, who being duly sworn, *Michael Hill*declared on *“*oath, that he was well acquainted wit!» the handwrit-*6S*ing of *Thomas Fates,*deceased ; that lie verily believed the paper purporting tobe the will and testament of said *Thomas Fates,*was in the proper Iiand- “ writing, as also the- signature of the said *Thomas “Fates;*that after the death of said *Thomas Fates,*he *“*was at the house of said *Thomas Fates,*and *Rachel*“ *Fates,*the widow of said deceased, brought the will to “ him, taking it out of a chest, in which he believes the “ deceased usually kept his valuable papers.” The other two witnesses only deposed to the handwriting of the testator, and said nothing of the place in which the paper was found. If the will was sufficiently proved, the verdict was to be entered for the *Defendant;*if not, for the lessors of the Plaintiffs.

Upon this verdict, his honor the presiding Judge, gave judgment for the Defendant, from which the lessors of the Plaintiff appealed.

The cause was submitted, without argument, by *Gas-ton*and *Hogg,*for the lessors of the Plaintiffs, and by *Badger,*for the Defendant.

Hare, Judge

It appears to me, that the judgment given in the Superior Court, upon the special verdict, was correct. The act of 1824, (BctJ. c. 225,) requires that the signature and handwriting of the testator should be proved by three witnesses. Here this has been done. Tiie other circumstances attending the probate, such as with whom the will was deposited for safe-keeping, or where it was found, are left by the act to be established by the same evidence that is ordinarily used in other cases. To establish these, three witnesses are not in*298dispensable *",*tlie testimony offered was relevant and pfo-por, and if believed, sufficient to authorise the probate.

I’thcrefore think, the judgment of the Superior Court. should be affirmed.

Pee Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,241
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,241
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    61
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       72
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (11)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>