alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Full throttle: 909th Aircraft Maintenance Unit Conducts Power Run

By Senior Airman Omari Bernard 18th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Esther C. Moran, Deceased. Marjorie Brigandi, Appellant-Respondent; Robert Martin et al., Respondents-Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[632 NYS2d 913]

Appeals unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Eric D.*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051). (Appeals from Order of Monroe County Surrogate’s Court, Ciaccio, S.— Will Probate.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
No. 91-6163.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Patrizio DiMonda, Petitioner, v William Bristol, as Licensing Officer, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 968]

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that respondent acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying petitioner’s application for a pistol permit. A licensing officer has broad discretion whether to grant or deny a permit under Penal Law § 400.00 (1) *(Matter of Fromson v Nelson,*178 AD2d 479; *Matter of Covell v Aison,*153 AD2d 1001, *lv denied*74 NY2d 615). The failure of petitioner to report on his application a prior arrest for driving while intoxicated provided a sufficient basis to deny the application *(see, Matter of Conciatori v Brown,*201 AD2d 323; *Matter of Willis v Treder, 127*AD2d 667; *Matter of Anderson v Mogavero,*116 AD2d 885). Respondent’s rejection of the explanation of petitioner that he did not understand that he had been arrested when he was given an appearance ticket, especially in view of the fact that petitioner was thereafter convicted of a lesser count, was not arbitrary and capricious and was not made "without sound basis in reason [or] * * * without regard to the facts” *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 231; *see, Matter of Marlow v Buckley,*105 AD2d 1160; *Matter of Bernstein v Police Dept.,*85 AD2d 574).

*831Petitioner did not dispute the factual basis for denial of his application but sought a hearing to explain further his misunderstanding. That request was denied by respondent. Penal Law § 400.00 (4-a) requires that respondent "either deny the application for reasons specifically and concisely stated in writing or grant the application and issue the license applied for” *(see, Davis v Clyne,*56 AD2d 692). That requirement is met when "[t]he petitioner [is] given the specific reasons for the denial of the pistol license, and given an opportunity to respond to the objections to [his] application” *(Matter of Savitch v Lange,*114 AD2d 372, 373). Because petitioner received a specific reason for the denial of his application and an opportunity to respond, his contention that he was denied due process is without merit. (Original CPLR art 78 Proceeding— Pistol Permit.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
steam_record - Re: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - PLANT ID 09166 - MILTON R. YOUNG 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----Craig Bleth <cbleth@minnkota.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: Craig Bleth <cbleth@minnkota.com> 

Date: 07/07/2010 05:52PM 

cc: John Graves <jgraves@minnkota.com>, Scott Hopfauf <SHopfauf@minnkota.com>, Gerry 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Craig Bleth <cbleth@minnkota.com>

Date: 7/9/2010 12:14 PM

Subject: Re: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - PLANT ID 09166 - MILTON R. YOUNG

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3712B5DO... 8/24/2011
Pfau <gpfau@minnkota.com>, Luther Kvernen <lkvernen@minnkota.com> 

Subject: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION - PLANT ID 09166 - MILTON R. YOUNG 

Ms. Alicea, 

Minnkota Power requests a 30-day extension for submittal of the Effluent Guidelines ICR, received

by our facility on June 18, 2010. The reason for our extension request is the present staff 

workload related to construction of Consent Decree air pollution control projects and planning for 

the upcoming fall outage on Unit 2 (which begins on September 11). 

Please contact me with any questions you may have. Will you be confirming the request has 

been granted? 

Regards, 

Craig J. Bleth 

Plant Environmental Superintendent 

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. 

Milton R. Young Station 

Office: 701-794-7261 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3712B5DO... 8/24/2011
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 20-F/A



[ ]

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,OR



[X]

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, For the fiscal period ended AUGUST 31, 2002, OR



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 1934, For the transition period from

______________ to _______________



Commission File Number - 000-31070



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



NOT APPLICABLE

(Translation of Registrant's Name into English)



ALBERTA, CANADA

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)



14604 - 115A AVENUE, EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CANADA, T5M 3C5

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



(Title of Each Class)

(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)

NONE

NONE



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

COMMON SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE



Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

NONE



Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Company's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report.  33,713,085



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ___  NoX



Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17X  Item 18



Index:



Ex 4

Audited Annual Financial Statements for Fiscal Year August 31, 2002









SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F/A and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Form-20F/A Fiscal 2002 year end 8/31/02 annual report on its behalf.



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.

(Registrant)



"Keith Gerrard"

_______________________________________

By: Keith Gerrard

Controller
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00125-CR

Juan MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5481

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

As stated in our previous order, the reporter’s record was due on August 25, 2014. On 

August 28, 2014, the court reporter responsible for filing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed 

a second notification of late record requesting more than thirty additional days to complete and 

file the reporter’s record. Although Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(b) allows the 

appellate court to extend the deadline to file the record if requested by the court reporter, it also 

provides that “[e]ach extension must not exceed 30 days in an ordinary [] appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 35.3(b). Accordingly, we GRANT the court reporter a thirty-day extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record is due on September 24, 2014. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         178,850
<SECURITIES>                                       289
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,928
<INVENTORY>                                      5,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               333,633
<PP&E>                                          66,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,742
<BONDS>                                         18,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          130,997
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,353
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 22, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Kristi Rene Nix, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-13-00569-CR and Tr. Ct. No. B11614

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED. Any other pending motions for relief are DENIED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 29, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1346 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1346

To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
    Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
         Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

   Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Minnesota, Ms. Esty, Mr. 
  Hultgren, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Webster of 
    Florida, Mr. Nolan, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Costa, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. 
   Quigley, and Mr. Denham) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
    Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
         Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    The rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform'' (81 Fed. Reg. 
93448 (December 20, 2016)) shall have no force or effect, and any 
regulation revised by that rule shall be applied as if that rule had 
not been issued.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10996 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DOMINGO MORA-HINOJOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CR-21-1-C

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Domingo Mora-Hinojos (“Mora”) appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mora argues that a prior aggravated-felony conviction is an element of the offense of reentry following deportation after an aggravated-felony conviction in violation of § 1326(b) and that, because the indictment to which he pleaded guilty failed to allege a prior felony conviction, his sentence is illegal. Mora concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v.No. 00-10996 -2- Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348, 2362 (2000), casts doubt

on Almendarez-Torres and asserts that he is raising the argument to preserve it for Supreme Court review. Although the Supreme Court noted in Apprendi that, arguably, Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided, the Court expressly declined to overrule Almendarez-Torres
. Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362-63 & n.15; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert . filed (U.S. Jan. 26, 2001) (No. 00-8299). This court is compelled to follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation and citation omitted). The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Double Down: Vipers Pack 2X The Ordnance

By  Lance Cpl. Luke KuennenMarine Light Attack Helicopter Squadron 367 (HMLA-367)

                MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII, Hawaii  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 44 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 6), 2017 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the 

Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 44 RDS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu2 reau of Land Management of the Department of the Inte3 rior relating to ‘‘Resource Management Planning’’ (pub4 lished at 81 Fed. Reg. 89580 (December 12, 2016)), and 

5 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 7, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's unaudited interim  Consolidated  Financial  Statements as of September
30, 2000 contained in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended  September  30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        16,150
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 21,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  4,023
<INVENTORY>                                                   1,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              37,378
<PP&E>                                                        12,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                                9,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                43,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         11,450
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      67
<OTHER-SE>                                                    31,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  43,419
<SALES>                                                       70,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              70,751
<CGS>                                                         62,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 19,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              1,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (12,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (12,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (12,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (2.01)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (2.01)<F1>


<FN>
<F1>
This amount is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 128
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Resin Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg Pendura, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: | March 2, 2004      
|----- | -------------------
|By:   | /s/ Keith Gerrard  
|      | Name: Keith Gerrard
|      | Title:Controller