alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
©2015	– Aerial	360	Imaging	– All	Rights	Reserved 1

N-Number:	 ACFT	TOTAL	TIME:	

Entered	into	logbook:	

Aerial	360	Imaging

Preflight	Form	and	Checklist

In	the	interest	of	public	safety	and	the	safety	of	manned	aircraft,	the	Pilot-in-Command	(PIC)	must	complete	this	form	

prior	to	each	flight	of	the	UAS.	Aerial	360	Imaging	will	maintain	this	form for review	by	the	FAA	upon	request	at	anytime.

Date: 					Time:	 					Location:

Nearest	Airport: 					METAR:

WX	:					VFR					MVFR					IFR					MIFR Airspace Class:

Distance	from	Airport	(NM):	 					

Tower/ATC	Phone	Number:	 					Notified:					Yes					No

Contact	Name:	 					Time:	

Nearest	Major	Intersection:

Distance	from	Flight	Location	(NM):	

Safety	Concerns:	

Additional	Comments:	

Pre-Flight	Checklist:

Check	Batteries	

Inspect	Fuselage	for	damage

Inspect	Propellers	for	damage

Verify	Compass/Satellite

Check	WX (wind	advisory)

Check	for	Airport	Vicinity

Check	Airspace	(Overlying)

Check	Surroundings

Notify	Tower/ATC	if	applicable

Inspect	Takeoff and	Landing	area

Warning	Signs	(150	foot	barrier)

Check	Controller	Batteries
©2015	– Aerial	360	Imaging	– All	Rights	Reserved 2

N-Number:	 ACFT	TOTAL	TIME:	

Entered	into	logbook:	

In-Flight	Procedures:

Start	timer	– Watch

Preform	Hover	Check	

Takeoff	and	Land	same	area

Verify	Controller	Sticks	are	center

Maintain	Situational	Awareness

Maintain	”sterile standards”	during	flight

Constantly	Plan	for	Emergency

Emergency	Procedures:

The	UAS	will	be	landed	immediately if	any	of	the	following	occurs:

• Manned	aircraft	is	seen	or	heard	in	vicinity	of	flight

• Pilot	is	distracted	from	focusing	on	the	flight

• Change	in	weather,	preventing	the	flight	from	continuing

• Increase	of	bird	activity	in	the	vicinity	of	the	flight

• Any	 action	 or	 unsafe	 event,	 which can	 cause	 the	 pilot	 distraction,	 interruption or	

anything,	which can	be	deemed	unsafe.	

Takeoff	time:	 				Landing	time:	 									Total	Flt	Time:	

Squawks:	

Corrective	Action	Taken:	

I	certify I	have	completed	 the	above	 form	and	checklist	prior	 to	 flight	of	 the	UAS	and the	

information	documented,	is	true	and	correct	to	the	best	of	my	knowledge.

PIC	Name:	 					Observer’s	Name:	

Signature:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 188 (Tuesday, December 16, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10975]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                Washington, DC, December 16, 2008.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     John D. Rockefeller, a Senator from the State of West 
     Virginia, to perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                   Robert C. Byrd,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. ROCKEFELLER thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

          WHEREAS, ALCAN ALUMINIUM LIMITED, a Canadian corporation (the
"Company"), proposes shortly to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended (the
"Act"), the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Act.

          WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the
Company as indicated below;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Serge
Fecteau, D. McAusland and R. Millington and each of them, as attorneys for the
undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, and in each of the
undersigned's offices and capacities as an Officer and/or a Director of the
Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving and
granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and
every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be
done, by virtue hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of
March 2000.

                                          /s/ E. R. Clitheroe
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Name:  E.R. Clitheroe
                                          Title: Director
Petition for Exemption

Elkhorn Aviation, Inc. dba Baker Aircraft

(a) Company Identification

Company Name: Elkhorn Aviation, Inc. dba Baker Aircraft

Contact: Genevieve Woydziak – Secretary Treasurer

Address: 43769 Heilner Road, Baker City, OR 97814

Telephone: (541) 523-5663

Email: Genevieve@bakercityairport.com

(b) Elkhorn Aviation, Inc., 135 certificate number K2ZA350L, and Part 91 ID No: K2ZJNM11,

would like to apply for a grant of exemption from Title 14, Part 120, to permit us, 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover, with an equivalent level of 

safety, our safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. We 

are currently covered by an approved FAA/DOT drug and alcohol testing program 

through a Consortium/Third Party Administrator:

Wienhoff Drug Testing

Program Manager: Colleen Wienhoff

5125 Glenwood Street, Boise, ID 83714 Telephone (208) 376-5600

(c) Relief: The relief we seek is acceptance of our existing program for both operations, in 

order to avoid redundant effort and expense. 

(d) Public Interest: Reducing our cost helps us maintain the lowest possible rates for our 

services, as well as minimizes the effort that the FAA must expend managing our drug

and alcohol program. Both are in the public interest. 

(e) Safety: The level of public safety remains the same or better. Our current program 

covering our 135 operations meets the drug testing requirements for both FAA Part 

91.147 and Part 135.

(f) Federal Register Summary: Request to allow existing FAA approved Drug Testing 

Program to be used for both Part 135 and Part 91.147 operations for a small company 

with very limited air tour operations.

(g) Summary: We are a small company that has been in business since 2004. Since this 

time we have had no drug/alcohol incidences.

(h) Outside the US: At this time, we have no plans to operate outside of the United States.

Thank you for your time. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I 

am available at (541) 523-5663.

Sincerely,

Genevieve Woydziak

Secretary-Treasurer

Elkhorn Aviation, Inc. dba Baker Aircraft
#### Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico, Respondent, v Ernst & Young et al., Appellants.

[631 NYS2d 147]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered August 4, 1994, which granted reargument and, upon reargument, adhered to a prior decision denying defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously modified, on the law, to provide that the denial is without prejudice, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly denied defendants’ motion to dismiss on Statute of Limitations grounds, as defendants did not show that, on the facts as alleged or as conceded by plaintiff, the action was time-barred. However, the timeliness of the action clearly depends on factual issues relating to the time at which the cause of action accrued. Because defendants had neither notice that the court would treat the motion as one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c) nor an opportunity to explore the outstanding factual issues by way of discovery, the denial should have been without prejudice to further consideration of such factual issues, upon a motion by defendants for summary judgment, or, if necessary, at trial. Whether there should be expedited and limited discovery on the timeliness issue is a question that should be left to the IAS Court. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 1 of 210/09/2008 15:28:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Docket (050- 00424)

Communication / IR160 - No communication / information not communicated A - Administrative Support A - Administrative 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Human-System Interface & Environmnt / IR170 - HSI or information availability / quality LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 

16

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / IR111 - Procedure / reference document technical content E - Electrical M - Maintenance / Repair 

111 - Procedure / reference document technical content E - Electrical T - Testing 111 - Procedure / reference document technical content M - Mechanical F - Modification 

319

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Problem Identification & Resolution / IR146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 

146 - Evaluation LTA G - Engineering S - Surveillance 

213

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Work Planning & Practices / IR185 - Procedural adherence LTA A - Administrative Support A - Administrative 

185 - Procedural adherence LTA O - Operations O - Control Room Ops 

186 - Failure to take action / meet requirements G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 187 - Action implementation LTA G - Engineering G - Design 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA H - Health Physics H - Health Physics 188 - Work practice or craft skill LTA M - Mechanical F - Modification 

744

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content E - Electrical F - Modification 
Human Factors Information System (HFIS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

From 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2007Page 2 of 210/09/2008 15:28:32

2x N

Total 

N

Document Types: IR, LER IR/LER Category Analysis by Docket Report

N

Average for Se

Details Department Work Type 

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Docket (050- 00424)

Procedures & Reference Document / LER111 - Procedure / reference document technical content E - Electrical F - Modification 

213

Number of Items for this Docket: 

Percent of Total for this Docket: 

Total Items for this Docket: 16
No. 86-1067.

#### Atisha *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Andersen Kicks Off 69th Operation Christmas Drop with Push Ceremony 

By Staff Sgt. Divine Cox36th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN PAD & PAPER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 517,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           277
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   517,837
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               663,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.84)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Resin Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg Pendura, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: | March 2, 2004                              
|----- | -------------------------------------------
|By:   | /s/ Greg Pendura                           
|      | Name: Greg Pendura                         
|      | Title:President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Pankey, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 766]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered January 6, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant contends that he was denied his right to a public trial *(see,*US Const 6th Amend; Civil Rights Law § 12; Judiciary Law § 4; *People v Jones,*47 NY2d 409, *cert denied*444 US 946) when the trial court closed the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover police officer. We agree. The officer’s testimony at the *Hinton*hearing *(see, People v Hinton,*31 NY2d 71, *cert denied*410 US 911) failed to establish a link between the officer’s fear for her safety and her open-court testimony *(see, People v Martinez,*82 NY2d 436). The record does not reflect that the undercover officer was still working in the locale where the defendant was arrested or that she expected to return there *(see, e.g., People v Cepeda,*209 AD2d 631). Moreover, the closure was broader than necessary since there was no finding by the court that the presence of the defendant’s girlfriend in the courtroom posed any threat to the undercover officer. Therefore, we conclude that the closing of the courtroom to everyone, including the defendant’s girlfriend, amounted to a violation of the defendant’s right to a public trial *(see, People v Kin Kan,*78 NY2d 54; *People v Green,*215 AD2d 309).

The defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Mangano, P. J., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
#### In re William Eugene EARNHARDT, Debtor. William Eugene EARNHARDT a/k/a William E. Earnhardt, Plaintiff, v. HERRING NATIONAL LEASE, INC., Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00635.

Complaint No. 81-0387.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina.

Oct. 19, 1981.

Deena J. Smith, Columbia, S. C., for plaintiff.

Danny C. Crowe, Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, Columbia, S. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. BRATTON DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor, William Eugene Earnhardt (plaintiff), by complaint, seeks to avoid a judgment lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1).1

*87FACTS

Herring National Lease, Inc. (defendant) obtained a judgment against plaintiff on September 29, 1980, in the amount of $34,-813. This judgment was recorded in Lexington County, South Carolina, as Judgment Roll Number 36,509. There has been no levy or execution on this judgment.

ISSUE

The issue in this case is whether or not the judgment lien may be avoided under § 522(f)(1).

DISCUSSION

Under § 15-35-810, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), a judgment creates a lien only on the judgment debtor’s real estate located in any county in *South Carolina*in which the judgment or transcript of judgment is entered. Since plaintiffs only real property is located in the State of North Carolina, and the judgment was recorded only in Lexington County, South Carolina, there is no lien against any *real property*avoidable under § 522(f)(1).

Nor is there a lien against plaintiff’s *personal property*by virtue of § 15-39-100, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), since a lien on *personal property*does not attach until levy and execution. There has been no levy and execution.

CONCLUSION

It appearing that the judgment creates no enforceable lien on any of the plaintiff’s real or personal property, there is, therefore, no lien avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1).

ORDER

Now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint should be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

1

. Section 522(f): “Notwithstanding any waiver of exemptions, the debtor may avoid the fixing of a lien on an interest of the debtor in property to the extent that such lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled under subsection (b) of this section, if such lien is — (1) a judicial lien; * *
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 8/8/2014 Sample Number: 142596-001 Date Collected:07/22/2014 09:10 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### WWTP Inlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 286000 10000 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4000 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-002 Date Collected:07/22/2014 09:03 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 202 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-003 Date Collected:07/22/2014 09:07 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Primary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 174 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-004 Date Collected:07/22/2014 08:55 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet A Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 16.8 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-005 Date Collected:07/22/2014 08:57 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Secondary Clarifier Outlet B Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 22.8 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-006 Date Collected:07/22/2014 09:00 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### WWTP Outlet Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 21.2 5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 2 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-007 Date Collected:07/22/2014 08:28 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 29.5 10 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 4 08/01/2014 Amos Plant, 142596 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 8/8/2014 Sample Number: 142596-008 Date Collected:07/22/2014 08:28 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.1 1 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.4 08/01/2014 

### Sample Number: 142596-009 Date Collected:07/22/2014 08:19 Date Received:7/22/2014 

### Clearwater Pond at Weir Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 4.3 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 08/01/2014

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Dave Conover, Senior Chemist Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 142596 Page 2 of 2
No. 91-6192.

#### Bourque *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.