alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary S. Clarke *et al.*v. Spencer D. Cotton *et al.*

*V legacy,*where the legatee is not described so as to take, sinks into the residue; but one given by a description which applies to several, goes to the sovereign as derelict,

After the decree pronounced at June term, 1831, *(ante*p. 51,) this case came on for further directions upon the report of the master stating, that by the fifteenth clause of her will, the testatrix devised as follows: *“*I give to *“ Martha Barrow,*daughter of *Beunet Barrow,*Esq. *“*four hundred dollars.” By the twenty-ninth clause, she gave to *Elizabeth Hunter*five hundred dollars. Mr. *Barrow*had not at the dato of the will, nor ever had, before or since that time, a daughter called or known by the name of *Martha;*he had two daughters named *Margaret*and *Olivia.*No evidence was before the master, that either of these were intended by the testatrix to bo described by the name of *Martha.*

Upon the other clause, the master reported, that there Were many persons known by the name of *Elizabeth Hunter;*but that it was entirely uncertain who the testatrix alluded to.

There being a deficiency of assets to pay the pecuniary legatees, Devereux. for them, moved for directions to divide the two sums mentioned in the report, between them *pro rata.*

Hendersd!N, Chief-Justice,

after stating the facts above mentioned, proceeded: As to the legacy *to,Martha*Barrow, there being no testimony, if admissible, to prove the identity of the person intended, and the question being presented on the will and facts before stated; it is but common learning to pronounce the bequest to be void for uncertainty. There is no legatee designated by name, or by any other description. The bequest is therefore void, and the case is to be considered as if it had never been made. It is property undisposed of. and is to be taken to pay general legacies, and if not needed for that purpose, it sinks into the residuum..

*302Upon the other clause of tlie will, it being as yet entirely uncertain, who is the *Elizabeth*Hunter, intended by the testatrix, it is unlike the case under the fifteenth clause. For here a legatee capable of taking, may yet appear. The ambiguity arises from the fact, that there are many answering to the description, and it may be shown by parol evidence, which of them the testatrix meant. The legacy then,- is not property undisposed of, but property given to a person who does not yet appear. It must therefore, be kept for her, and if after a reasonable time, it bo not claimed by the legatee, it goes to the sovereign as the trustee of-all derelict property. In this state, the Trustees of the University have succeeded to this right of the sovereign, and at a proper time, they can claim the legacy.

Per Curiam. — Direct accordINgut.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50216

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE DOMINIQUE KING,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CR-49-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrance Dominique King appeals the district court’s denial

of his motion to suppress and his sentence. King argues that the

unannounced entry of the police into the motel room violated the

Fourth Amendment. However, the district court found the

following exigent circumstances: (1) danger of destruction of

evidence due to the proximity of the bathroom in a motel room and

the fact that the drug was crack cocaine without any indicaton

that the drugs were in a large enough quantity that they could
not be easily disposed of, (2) danger of escape because one

suspect had fled from the police in the past, (3) greater danger

than in the single dwelling setting to innocent citizens

frequenting the motel or in nearby rooms, and (4) the information

that King had posted a lookout and the fact that the police were

dressed distinctively in raid gear increased each of the first

three dangers in this situation. These exigent circumstances

support a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing would

have been futile and allowed escape or destruction of evidence

and therefore justified the failure to knock and announce. See

Richards v. Wisconsin, 117 S. Ct. 1416, 1421-22 (1997). 

King also argues that the district court erred in assessing

criminal history points for three separate offenses for which he

was arrested on the same day and which he contends were part of a

common scheme or plan. The convictions were not related within

the meaning of the sentencing guidelines. See United States v.

Ford, 996 F.2d 83, 85-86 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-05797,
333-05795, 333-09257, 333-13259, 333-27927, 333-27929, 333-69717, 333-91801, 333-53842,
333-102338, 333-117843, and 333-117844) and Form S-3 (Nos. 033-61903, 333-09151 and 333-89836) of American
Science and Engineering, Inc. of our report dated June 9, 2005 relating to the financial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston,
MA
June 17, 2005

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H184]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SPECIAL ORDERS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 6, 2009, and under a previous order of the House, the following 
Members will be recognized for 5 minutes each.

                          ____________________
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Missouri Arrives in Pearl Harbor 

By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Shaun GriffinUSS Missouri Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
N-S 1STCOURT OF APPEALS iAVnMC,+^ CLzn^f- U?

HOUSTON, TEXAS ' f

(A -ThiO. €U\t cs^T^/vs JAN-5 2015 ^(^ 1\a^s ni^z g^

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE (H

Tfcxv/ (Wd £#st Ho, izfiltr -12% S£ ^

£l-km /fifths jAi^s h/d-/ "Thg^D'iS^e.^ A4*hart*y * k^\A(ll£. Afrnd pz Vo/^3 //^c/6/z- (St/t^t- Any 'TZisteucffcr^ em g^ ftboat

?-& m
' <• -j J f

'..! ! J I

: f' I i \ !•

4-

3^ ^?

'a

rf XKi

\i0

M c

3

v>

^

3

%

|1 - | J

en

v«

a)

o

(M

(M

Q.

Q
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |   |                               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      March 31, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Larry      J. Stinson     |   |
|                       |   | Larry      J. Stinson              |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Financial Officer       |   |
|                       |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |   |
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2016

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 34

2. Cases Added to Docket 0

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket

S.J. Louis Construction of Texas

No. 12-1045

Decision on February 5, 2016

The Davey Tree Expert Company

No. 11-2556

Decision on February 26, 2016

The Davey Tree Expert Comany

No. 12-1324

Decision on February 26, 2016

-3

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 31
# TRIBAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE P.O. BOX 305 • LAPWAI, IDAHO 83540 • (208) 843-2253 13 November 2015 Docket Operations U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, Room W12-140 West Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590-001 Re: Amendment to Nez Perce Tribe's July 28, 2015 Petition (FAA-2015-4929-0001) for a Summary Grant of an Expedited Sectio· n 333 Exemption to Operate Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Aerial Data Collection Dear Sir ofMadam: The Nez Perce Tribe respectfully amends its July 28,2015 petition (FAA-2015-4929-0001) for a summary grant of an expedited exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization Act of2012 and 14 CFR Part 11 , to operate small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) for aerial data collection to add the following sUAS: 

## * DJI Phantom Professional 3
. As set forth in the Tribe's July 28,2015 petition, the Tribe's use ofs UAS for aerial data collection will assist the Tribe in carrying out functions including biological, fisheries, wildlife, land, forestry, environmental and natural resources research, monitoring, and management. The FAA has granted numerous summary grants ofexemptions for the DJI Phantom Professional 3 sUAS that the Tribe intends to use 1 and the operations the Tribe intends to conduct (aerial data collection for environmental monitoring and wildlife conservation). Please contact David J
. Cummings in the Tribe's Office ofLegal Counsel (208
.843.7355) or me ifyou have any questions concerning this amendment to the Tribe's petition. Sincerely,



### t;~,#.9~ Anthor{1 D, Johnso n Chairman

1 For'example, the FAA has granted exemptions to use the DJI Phantom Professional 3 sUAS in Grants of Exemption #12073 (FAA-2015-1367); #12037 (FAA-20 15-1431); #12603 (FAA-2015-1087) ; # 12425 (FA
. A-2015- 1968).
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Wireless Age
      Communications, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending
      December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Brad Poulos, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      his knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






Date:
      April 30, 2007


By: /s/
      John
      G. Simmonds


Name:
      John G. Simmonds


Title:
      President, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Director
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                              |

----
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Jian Xue, Chief Financial Officer of China Ivy School, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 28, 2007 /s/ Jian Xue Name: Jian Xue Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,899,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,239,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,885,747
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,564,444
<PP&E>                                      19,318,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             175,552,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,906,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 87,509,402
<COMMON>                                         5,581
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               175,552,163
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,994,572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,008,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,140,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (814,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,326,175)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 1162 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program to provide 

access to magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy to veterans. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Hero Left Untreated Act’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy has 

successfully treated more than 400 veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, military sexual 

trauma, chronic pain, and opiate addiction. 

(2) Recent clinical trials and randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies have produced promising measurable outcomes in the evolution of magnetic EEG/EKG-guided 

resonance therapy. 

(3) The outcomes described in paragraph (2) have resulted 

in escalating demand from returning members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans who are seeking access to magnetic EEG/ 

EKG-guided resonance therapy. 

(4) Congress recognizes the importance of initiating innovative pilot programs that demonstrate the use and effectiveness 

of new treatment options for post-traumatic stress disorder, 

traumatic brain injury, military sexual trauma, chronic pain, 

and opiate addiction. 

SEC. 3. MAGNETIC EEG/EKG-GUIDED RESONANCE THERAPY PILOT 

PROGRAM. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—Commencing not later than 90 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs shall carry out a pilot program to provide access to magnetic 

EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy to treat veterans suffering 

from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, military 

sexual trauma, chronic pain, or opiate addiction. 

(b) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program 

under subsection (a) at not more than two facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(c) PARTICIPANTS.—In carrying out the pilot program under 

subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide access to magnetic EEG/ 

EKG-guided resonance therapy to not more than 50 veterans. 

(d) DURATION.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program 

under subsection (a) for a 1-year period. 
H. R. 1162—2 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the termination 

of the pilot program under subsection (d), the Secretary shall submit 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives a report 

on the pilot program. 

(f) NO AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—No additional 

amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the requirements of this section. Such requirements shall be carried out using 

amounts authorized under provisions of law other than this section. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.