alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SPIN MASTER LTD.,

Appellant

v.

CHOIROCK CONTENTS FACTORY CO., LTD.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-1348, 2021-1349, 2021-1350

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-

00897, IPR2019-00900, IPR2019-00901.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by CLIFFORD T.

BRAZEN, MEGAN JOANNA REDMOND. 

 SIHO YOO, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, San 

Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

THOMAS JAMES DALY, SYED A. HASAN, Glendale, CA. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-1348 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 10/12/2021
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

October 12, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1348 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 10/12/2021
FEDERAL REGISTER: 51 FR 40026 (November 4, 1986)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)

30 CFR Part 705

Restriction on Financial Interests of State Employees

ACTION: Correction 

In FR Doc. 86-23462 beginning on page 37118 in the issue of Friday, October 17, 1986, make the following correction: 

On page 37121, in the third column, in the paragraph under "Section 705.13 Time for filing.", in the eleventh and twelfth 

lines, remove "(Insert: * * * publication.)", and insert "March 16, 1987." 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Unveiled: Lone Sailor Statue Stands Watch in Guam

Joint Region Marianas Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the annual report of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Doug Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Doug Ball


__________________________________


Doug Ball, CA


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Accounting and Financial Officer


March 23, 2012








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and will be retained by Oncolytics Biotech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re Robert L. WILBUR, Joyce A. Wilbur, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 182-00013.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine.

Nov. 15, 1982.

Richard Joyce, South Windham, Me., trustee.

Louis Kornreich, Gross, Minsky, Mogul & Singal, Bangor, Me., for debtors.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FREDERICK A. JOHNSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtors filed a joint petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on January 15, 1982. In Schedule B-4, the debtors claimed the following exemption: “1944 Aeronaca Airplane claimed to the extent of $1200.00.” The debtors assert that they are entitled to the exemption under 14 M.R.S.A. § 4422(2), which provides an exemption for “[t]he debtor’s interest, not to exceed $1,200 in value, in one motor vehicle.”

On March 23, 1982, the trustee objected to the exemption of the airplane under section 4422(2).

The sole issue is whether or not the debtors are entitled to exempt their 1944 Aero-naca airplane as a motor vehicle. The court concludes that they may not. “Motor vehicle” is not defined in the Maine exemption statute. The debtors argue that since the term is not defined, the court should apply the common definition of the term.

29 M.R.S.A. § 1.7 defines a motor vehicle as “any self-propelled vehicle not operated exclusively on tracks, including motorcycles, but not including snowmobiles.... ”

It must be conceded that the debtors’ aircraft would fit within this definition. It is a self-propelled vehicle which does not operate exclusively on tracks.

*4066 M.R.S.A. § 3.5 defines an aircraft as “any contrivance .. . used or designed for navigation of or flight in the air....”

This definition puts the debtors’ argument back on the ground where it belongs.

The court admires the debtors’ ingenuity. However, they fail to perceive the purpose of the exemption statute. The purpose of the statute is to leave the debtors with property needed for their support and the support of their family. *In re Breau,*17 B.R. 697 (Bankr.Me.1982).

The Maine Legislature provided an exemption in a motor vehicle to ensure that a debtor will have the transportation necessary to enable him to work and to perform the other tasks which are necessary if he is to have a true fresh start.

It is difficult to believe that the Maine Legislature intended that a debtor exempt “any contrivance ... used or designed for navigation of or flight in the air ...” or even an antique aircraft, which is defined by 6 M.R.S.A. § 3.10-A as “an aircraft in excess of 30 years of age which is flown only for purposes of demonstration or show.”

The trustee’s objection to the debtors’ claimed exemption under 14 M.R.S.A. § 4422(2) must be sustained.

An appropriate order will be entered.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.



|             |  |  |  |                                                                                
|------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | 
|May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                                            
|             |  |  |  |                                                                                
|             |  |  |  | Graham V. Smith Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H196]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     PRIVATE BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 3 of rule XII,

        Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts introduced a bill (H.R. 492) 
     for the relief of Esther Karinge; which was referred to the 
     Committee on the Judiciary.

                          ____________________
```
No. 82-598.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**



# Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

**Committee (FRRCC)**  **MEETING AGENDA**  **December 12, 2011**  **U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW**  **Washington, DC 20460 Ariel Rios North Building, Room 3530** 

**9:3 0 a**  **m Registration**  **10:0 0**  **Call to Orde r /**  **Discussion of Meeting Agenda**

 **Alicia Kaiser**, FRRCC Designated Federal Officer
 **Steven Balling** , FRRCC Chair
 **Lawrence Elworth** , Agricul tu ral Counsel or to the Administrator, EPA **10:15 Formal Approval of Final FRRCC Repo**  **rt 11:00**  **Discuss Briefing Schedule**  **for Senior EPA and USDA Officials**  **11:15 Discuss Ideas for Future of FRRCC**  **12 :00**  **pm Adjourn**
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1073 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1073

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish a structure for 
visitor services on the Arlington Ridge tract, in the area of the U.S. 
           Marine Corps War Memorial, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``Arlington Ridge tract'' means the parcel of 
Federal land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as the Nevius 
Tract and transferred to the Department of the Interior in 1953, that 
is bounded generally by--
            (1) Arlington Boulevard (United States Route 50) to the 
        north;
            (2) Jefferson Davis Highway (Virginia Route 110) to the 
        east;
            (3) Marshall Drive to the south; and
            (4) North Meade Street to the west.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF A VISITOR SERVICES FACILITY ON THE ARLINGTON 
              RIDGE TRACT.

    Notwithstanding section 2863(g) of Public Law 107-107, the 
Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct a structure for 
visitor services to include a public restroom facility on the Arlington 
Ridge tract in the area of the U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Second Department,

September, 1995

(September 8, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael P. Romano, on Behalf of Conchita Link, Petitioner, v Gerald Burckhard, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 520]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Westchester County Indictment No. 95-00904.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail on Westchester County Indictment No. 95-00904 to the sum of $35,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum as a cash bail alternative. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Wing Support Squadron 171 Completes Exercise Kamoshika Wrath 17-1

By Cpl. Donato MaffinMarine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92139-92140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Revocation of AmSpec LLC (Christiansted, St. Croix, USVI)

    as a Customs-Accredited Laboratory and Customs-Approved Gauger
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: General notice of revocation of AmSpec LLC (Christiansted, St. 
Croix, USVI) as a Customs-accredited laboratory and Customs-approved 
gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP) regulations, that CBP has revoked the 
accreditation and approval for AmSpec LLC's

[[Page 92140]]

Christiansted, St. Croix, USVI, laboratory and gauging facility to test 
petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes and to gauge 
petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes.

DATES: The effective date of revocation is October 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Eugene Bondoc, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, CB-03 Mail 
Stop #1110, Washington, DC 20229-1110, tel. 202-344-1060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with 
the provisions of Sections 151.12(k)(2)(i) and 151.13(i)(2)(i) of Title 
19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), that CBP has revoked the 
accreditation and approval of the AmSpec, LLC laboratory and gauging 
facility at 9010 Estate Cottage, Suite 3, Christiansted, St. Croix, 
USVI 00820, to test petroleum and petroleum products and to gauge 
petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes. The duration of 
the revocation of accreditation and approval is indefinite.
    Inquiries regarding the entity's status as an approved gauger and/
or as an accredited laboratory may be directed to CBP by calling (202) 
344-1060 or by sending an email to [email protected]. Please 
reference the website listed below for a complete listing of CBP 
approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.http://www.cbp.gov/about/labs-scientific/commercial-gaugers-and-laboratories.

    Dated: November 15, 2024.
Larry D. Fluty,
Assistant Commissioner, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2024-27252 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```
1. Emergency

hazard arises

2. States/Tribes submit 

a request for 

emergency declaration

7. Emergency 

Abated 4. Finding of Fact

6. State/Tribe spends 

emergency funds on 

approved project

APPENDIX 4.2-6

Emergency AML Reclamation Process

3. Declaration of 

Emergency

OSMRE assesses 

environmental review in 

the ATP request 

(EA or DEIS)

OSMRE evaluates 

significance of impacts and 

prepares appropriate 

NEPA documentation

(FEIS)

OSMRE makes a finding 

and prepares a decision 

document

(FONSI, Significance 

Determination, or ROD)

5. OSMRE issues an 

Authorization to 

Proceed

Conduct Other Regulatory Processes

(See Emergency Procedures Chapter 3.3)

3. CE, EA, 

or EIS Determination

(See Chapter 2)

4. Identify 

Alternatives

(if any) and Study 

Methodologies

1. Identify the 

Proposal and Need

2.Identify Federal 

Action(s)

5. Complete 

Studies/Technical 

Reports 

DEIS or EA

6. Alternative 

Selection and 

Decision 

Document

* NEPA Compliance 

Complete

Start 

NEPA Review

(Data Collection 

Complete)

Note depending on the emergency and danger, the NEPA evaluation can be deferred in order to provide 

immediate assistance as needed. (See Chapter 2 for more information)

Note: This flowchart only illustrates an approval process. An applicant 

can withdraw the proposal, and/or OSMRE can request additional 

information, and/or not approve the proposal at anytime throughout 

the review process.

Legend

Beginning or End Point Task Direction Arrows

Required Project Tasks Iterative Task Direction Arrows

State or Tribal Program Responsibility

OSMRE Program Responsibility

OSMRE NEPA Review Tasks

OSMRE Tasks for Other Regulatory Processes 

Timing Guide in relation to Tasks

Milestone and Decisions Points

NEPA Schedule Guide

Guidelines for Milestones and Decisions 

Point Timing (Note: Approximately located as a 

sliding scale based on specific project circumstances)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.



|               |  |                                      
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|April 27, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephanie G. DiMarco             
|               |  | Stephanie G. DiMarco                 
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8078

JOSHUA BRENT MCCLARY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse; CLARK, Mrs., Doctor; C. D. DAVIS, Capt.; J. MERRITT, Lt.; W. BEST,

Defendants – Appellees,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Party-in-Interest – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB)

Submitted: June 8, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Brent McClary, Appellant Pro Se. William Wayne Muse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; John Otto Easton, Virginia Margaret Sadler, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, LLP, Fairfax, Virginia; Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court’s

order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. McClary v. Fowlkes , No. 1:07-cv01080-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
No. 91-5696.

#### Busacca *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 706 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-384, K2025-382.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27179 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P