alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Newsroom

The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement supports a culture of openness with the news media and the public that values the free exchange of ideas, data, and information and that provides for the dissemination of accurate scientific, scholarly, technical and management information. OSMRE is committed to keeping its constituencies and the general public informed and welcomes public interest in its programs and activities through news media coverage and other forms of communication. 

OSMRE’s Office of Communications responds to queries and interview requests from journalists, coordinates press briefings and media events, and plans, implements, and directs internal and external communications for OSMRE.

**For press inquiries, contact:  osm-news@osmre.gov**

News Releases
Find news releases from the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
Read more

Social Media
Learn about OSMRE's social media accounts and join the conversation.
Read more

Stories
Read stories about OSMRE's mission and impact.
Read more

Fact Sheets
This page contains links to OSMRE Fact Sheets, divided into categories.
Read more
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0427. IN THE INTEREST OF: B. M., A CHILD (MOTHER).

On August 28, 2015, the juvenile court entered an order adjudicating minor

child B. M. to be dependent. On October 21, 2015, B. M.’s mother filed a notice of

appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be

appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is

an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Perlman v. Perlman,

318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012). The mother’s notice of appeal,

filed 54 days after entry of the dependency order, is untimely. Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/14/2016

October 14, 2016
#### Den ex. dem. of Jonathan S. Tayloe & another *v.*Fen & David Gaskins,

From Bertie.

A sale made by the Sheriff on the return-day of the Fi. *fa.*is good.

Ejectment, and on the trial the case was, that the lessors of the Plaintiff claimed the premises under a deed from the Sheriff of Bertie. The judgment and execution were regular ; but the sale was made by the Sheriff on the second Monday of August, 1825, which was, the return day of the writ.

His honor Judge Martin, instructed the Jury, that the sale was good in law, A verdict being returned for the Plaintiff, the Defendant appealed.

*Hogg,*for the Appellant,

submitted the case, only referring to *Doe ex dem.*of *Basden*v. *McKinne,*(4 *Hawks 279).*

No Counsel appeared for the Plaintiff.

Tayior, Chief-Justice

The lessors .of the Plaintiff claim title under a Sheriff’s sale, (nade on the day the *Fi. fa.*was returnable *;*and the only question in the case is, whether such a sale is legal ? Xthas been repeatedly decided, that the Sheriff may lawfully execute an execution on the day it is returnable. As to chattels, if he levy before, he may sell after the return-day; and. as to land, a sale on the day is unquestionably valid. The *296general rule is explicitly stated in 1 Salk. 321, and the cases there cited. The case cited for the Defendant,from 4tb *Hawks,*was where tin* sale took place more than a year after the *teste*of the execution, and without a *venditioni exponas ;*where tfie writ had never been returned, and the endorsement of the levy made under questionable circumstances, being after the sale. There the execution was dead in law *;*here it was in full vigor.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Ham, Judge.

The question made in this case is, whether the Sheriff can legally sell lands on the first day of the term to which the execution is returnable ? Against it, is cited *Basden*v. *McKinne.*In that case, the Sheriff sold about two years after the execution was returnable and without any new execution. But this question is put at rest by the judgment given in the case of *Lanier*v. *Stone,*(1 *Hawks*829). It. is there stated to be the daily practice, and no inconvenience has been experienced from it. It is often done at the importunity of Defendants, to give them the longest possible time to raise the money.

The rule for a new trial must be discharged.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1026 

To revise the authorized route of the North Country National Scenic Trail 

in northeastern Minnesota and to extend the trail into Vermont to 

connect with the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. NOLAN (for himself, Mr. WELCH, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. 

PETERSON, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. WALZ, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MEEKS, 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. KILDEE, 

Mr. BEYER, Mr. TONKO, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. FASO, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. PAULSEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the authorized route of the North Country National 

Scenic Trail in northeastern Minnesota and to extend 

the trail into Vermont to connect with the Appalachian 

National Scenic Trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Country Na5 tional Scenic Trail Route Adjustment Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1026 IH

1 SEC. 2. ROUTE ADJUSTMENT. 

2 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the first sentence— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘thirty-two hundred miles, ex5 tending from eastern New York State’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘4,600 miles, extending from the Appalachian Trail 

7 in Vermont’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘Proposed North Country Trail’’ 

9 and all that follows through ‘‘June 1975.’’ and in10 serting ‘‘ ‘North Country National Scenic Trail, Au11 thorized Route’, dated February 2014, and num12 bered 649/116870.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Retired Marine Keeps Combined Arms Training Center Camp Fuji Safe

Marine Corps Installations Pacific

                COMBINED ARMS TRAINING CENTER CAMP FUJI, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Conrad D. Clement, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Featherlite, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Conrad D. Clement Chief Executive
Officer
|----- |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32  Certification of Periodic Financial Report



James C. Holly and Kenneth R. Taylor hereby
certify as follows:



1.  They are the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Sierra Bancorp.



2.  The Form 10-K of Sierra
Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (together the “Report”), complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Bancorp.



|July 22, 2014 | /s/ James C. Holly        
|------------- | --------------------------
|Date          | James C. Holly            
|              | Chief Executive Officer   
|              |                           
|July 22, 2014 | /s/  Kenneth R. Taylor    
|Date          | Kenneth R. Taylor         
|              | Executive Vice President &
|              | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Doane
Products Company's unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,988
<PP&E>                                         114,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,913
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     28,864
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,465
<SALES>                                        399,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,044
<CGS>                                          351,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1,323)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Leadership : Biographies : Article View
# Official Journal C 164/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 164 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6024 May 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 164

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6024 May 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 164/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | European Data Protection Supervisor |
| 2017/C 164/02 | Summary of EDPS Opinion on the proposal for a regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 164/01

Euro exchange rates

1

European Data Protection Supervisor

2017/C 164/02

Summary of EDPS Opinion on the proposal for a regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 164/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8433 — Zalando/Bestseller United/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 164/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8433 — Zalando/Bestseller United/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### JOHN L. HINTON v. B. F. WHITEHURST, Adm’r., and others.

A creditor has the right to subject the land *itself*of his deceased debtor to the satisfaction of his debt, although there has been partition among the heirs. And one of the heirs cannot discharge his share of the land by offering to pay his part of the debt, or the amount at which it was assessed to him in the partition.

(See same case, 68 N. C. Rep., 816; VI N. C. Rep., 66; and 73 N. C Rep., 157.)

Civil Action, originally brought to subject land to the payment of debts, tried before Eure, J., at Spring Term, 1876, of PasquotANK Superior Court.

The facts of the case have been heretofore fully set out in the several reports thereof, to be found in the 68 N. C. Rep., 316; 71 N. C. Rep., 66; and 73 N. C. Rep., 157.

The judgment of this Court at June Term, 1875, being-sent down to the Court below, the presiding Judge proceeded in accordance with that judgment, to declare the rights of the parties and adjudge agreeably thereto.

From his judgment the defendant, W. T. Whitehurst, appealed. The points raised by defendant are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*179No counsel for appellant in this Court.

*Smith & Strong,*contra.

Reade, J.

This case has been heretofore twice before us, and the rights of the parties so fully declared that there is no necessity to consider them further. His Honor followed those cases, and of course there is no error.

A creditor has the right to subject the land *itself*of his deceased debtor to the satisfaction of his debt, although there has been partition among the heirs. And one of the heirs cannot discharge his share of the land by offering to pay *Ms part*of the debt; or the amount at which it was assessed to him in the partition. Nor will it make any difference that his share has increased in value, as in this case by the diminished burden of a life estate, unless by improvements, which he has made above the rents and profits; in which case, it may be, he would be allowed for the improvements to the extent that they increased the market value of the land.

There is no error. *Hinton*v. *Whitehunt,*Adm., 73 N. C. Rep., 157.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Weapons Evaluators Secure Perfection in the Skies 

By Tech. Sgt. Araceli Alarcon35th Fighter Wing

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,916,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  313,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,868,024
<PP&E>                                       6,256,795
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,966,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,204,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,387,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    41,001,632
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,204,512
<SALES>                                      1,637,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          522,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,338,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             699,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,822,784)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 91-6114.

#### Largo-Montenegro *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.