_GEt~E- ~ 

_...,_-------P-AR_T_I_C_UL_A_T_I< Re_r_s-_ \ t Dcrte : 

c,;;: f.] [ ... '1 

'Se('t -C \ 

SULFUR DIOXIDE, NITROGEN ( -

1 ,.,,--t DiD. 

n r -: : ~ __ , 

-I I I I ! L-C ;.r_ J / 

'S 

• 

CONDUCTED ON THE 

TUNNEL KILN #38 

IN 

LOIDSVILLE, KENTUCKY 

FOR 

GENERALSHALEPRODUCTSCORPORATION 

ON 

SE;PTEMBER 21, 2001 

APPROVED BY __L...n_r {u-+!VTommy Lotz, Jr 

Director, Field services 

\/ 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
, 

Chapter 

I 

II 

Ill 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Introduction and Process Description 

Test Results 

Page 

1 

Summary of Test Results ......................... 2 

Tables 

1 Summarized Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

Graphs 

1 Particulate & HF Emissions .................. 5 

2 Sulfur Dioxide Results ...................... 6 

3 Nitrogen Oxide Results ...................... 7 

Particulate Input Parameters and Results ............ 8 

S02 Input Parameters and Complete Results . . . . . . . . . 12 

NO. Input Parameters and Complete Results ......... 22 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures ................. 32 

Figures 

1 Stack Breeching Diagram 

and Sample Point Location ...................... 44 

2 Orsat Sampling Train .......................... 45 

3 Method 26A Sampling Train (Particulate and HF) .... 46 

3 S02 Sampling Train ........................... 47 

4 NO. Sampling Train ........................... 48 

IV Field Data 

Nomenclature & Equations Particulate ................. 49 

Particulate Hand Calculations ........................ 56 

Nomenclature & Equations S02 ••.•.•.....••....•.... 58 

Nomenclature & Equations NO. . ..................... 59 

Field Data Sheets ................................. 60 

Particulate Analysis ................................ 64 

HF Analysis ...................................... 70 

Visual Emissions Sheets ............................ 79 

S02 Instrument Data Sheets ......................... 82 

NO. Data Sheets .................................. 87 

Outlet Orsat Analysis .............................. 92 

Fluke Hydra Data Logger Printout ..................... 94 

v Plant Operational Data ..................................... . 104 

VI Calibrations 105 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
r 

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

On September 21, 2001 Guardian System Inc., performed a series of testing for 

particulate, hydrogen fluoride, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and visual emissions on the 

#38 Tunnel Kiln baghouse exhaust stack for General Shale Products Corporation in 

Louisville, Kentucky. These tests were conducted in accordance with the rules and 

regulations expressed in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Reference 

Methods 1-4, 6C, ?E, 9 & 26a, as amended. 

Individual bricks are formed and stacked onto kiln cars. Cars are inserted on a 

regular basis into a long, continuous- fired tunnel kiln. As one car is discharged another 

is inserted. This provides a constant moving mass inside the kiln. Cars are pushed through 

the kiln at a slow, methodical pace requiring several days for the complete travel. By 

means of a coal and natural gas firing process, heat is increased in each chamber until the 

total firing is complete. As the car continues through the kiln from the main firing chamber, 

the temperatures are reduced to provide necessary cooling. 

The exhaust gases pass through a hydrated lime scrubber and then to a bag house. 

Mr. Phil Towles represented General Shale Products Corporation, and is 

responsible for all production data. Ms. Jeani Bryant, Jefferson County Air Pollution 

Control District, observed the tests. Mr. Lalan Kirby, Mr. Tommy Lotz, Jr., Mr. David 

Bailey, and Mr. Terry Gaither of Guardian Systems, Inc., performed these tests. 

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 
II. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 

The following is a summary of the test results conducted on the Kiln Baghouse 

Exhaust Stack on September 21, 2001. For complete information see Table 1. 

KILN EXHAUST STACK EMISSION TESTS 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Process Rate, # 

bricklhr 26,440 26,440 26,440 26,440 

Particulate Mass 

Rate, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Mass Rate, #/hr <0.0014 0.0028 <.0015 <0.0019 

Nitrogen Oxides, 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 

ppm 

Sulfur Dioxide, - -,"i, loe 

orains per 100 dscf f-4! (VV' 

n OJ" n& nR n? n4 '"' 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS enc 

2 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Stack Gas Temperature, F 270 269 273 271 

Moisture Content, % v/v 11.11 10.39 8.45 9.98 

Oxygen Content, % v/v 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 

Carbon Dioxide Content, % v/v 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 

,tack Gas Velocity 

Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 

Volumetric Flow 

Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,019 

Volumetric Flow 

Dry Std Cubic Feet per Minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,990 

Concentration 

Grains per Actual Cubic Foot 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 

Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 

Allowable 

Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 19.24 19.24 19.24 19.24 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 

Allowable 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 20 20 20 20 

Table 1 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS Inc 

3 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. ·· 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Hydrogen Fluoride Rate, #/hr < 0.0014 0.0028 < 0.0015 < 0.0019 

% lsokinetic 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 

Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 

Allowable 

·~itrogen Oxides,ppm 300 300 300 300 

Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 35.95 33.34 40.62 36.64 

Allowable 

Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 28.63 28.63 28.63 28.63 

Table 1- Continued 

Gt IARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

4 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

s .••.....••.•. ·.·. '·*········.•mmn•R~tor•·GeMrai·SMret>toauetico·······.•······.·ti· ·. ···.·.····.•.•.· · .. · ... ·.·· ... ·.··.··.·.·.·.· .··.·.·.··•· ... ·.·.·.··.···.···•·.· .. · .. ··.·.·.·.·.· .. ·.·.· .. ·.··.······.··.···.·.·· .. ·.·.· .. · . rp 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

~-------------------------------------------------~ 

I GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORPORATION 

#38 Kiln Emissions on September21, 2001 

0.7 ... 

:::J 

0 0.6 :J: 

... 

CD 

c. 0.5 

1/) 

"0 

c 

:::J 0.4 

0 

a.. 

I 0.3 CD 

-ra 

:::J 0.2 

u 

:e 

ra 0.1 a.. 

0 

1 2 3 

Run Number 

] • Particulate D Hydrogen Flouride I 

Graph 1 

Average 

0.005 

0.004 ... 

:::J 

0 

:J: 

... 0.003 8. 

1/) 

"0 

c 

0.002 5 

a.. 

u. 

0.001 :J: 

0 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

5 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Barometric Pressure, in Hg 29.97 29.97 29.97 29.97 

Static Pressure, in H20 -0.24 -0.24 -0.24 -0.240 

Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60 

Meter Volume, CF 39.624 44.765 41.757 42.049 

..,eter Correction factor, MCF 0.9704 0.9704 0.9704 

Meter Volume (Corrected) 38.451 43.440 40.521 40.804 

Stack Temperature, F 270 269 273 271 

Meter Temperature, F 70 85 85 80 

Meter Pressure, in H20 1.313 1.707 1.461 1.494 

Sqr Velocity Pressure 0.523 0.585 0.545 0.551 

Mass of Particulate, mg 7.1 13.3 6.0 8.8 

Mass of Hydrogen Fluoride,ug < 30.000 57.000 < 30.000 < 39.000 

Ml of Water Collected 102.2 104.3 77.4 94.6 

%Oxygen 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 

% Carbon Dioxide 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

8 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computer Input Parameters for General Shale ProductS Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Stack Area, Sq ft 10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 

Pilot Correction Factor 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828 

Nozzle Diameter, in 0.285 0.285 0.285 0.285 

Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 

Sulfur Dioxide, ppm 308.66 286.27 348.83 314.59 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS •nc 

9 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

1. Stack Pressure 

Inches Hg 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95 

Millimeters Hg 760.79 760.79 760.79 760.79 

2. Meter Pressure 

Inches Hg 30.07 30.10 30.08 30.08 

Millimeters Hg 763.69 764.43 763.97 764.03 

.l. Meter Volume 

Dry Std Cubic Feet 38.494 42.332 39.464 40.096 

Dry Std Cubic Meters 1.090 1.199 1.118 1.136 

4. Water Volume 

Std Cubic Feet 4.811 4.909 3.643 4.454 

Std Cubic Meters 0.136 0.139 0.103 0.126 

5. Moisture Content, % 11.11 10.39 8.45 9.98 

6. Molecular Weight Dry 29.22 29.22 29.26 29.23 

7. Molecular Weight Wet 27.97 28.06 28.30 28.11 

8. Stack Velocity 

Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 

Meters per Second 10.53 11.76 10.93 11.07 

9. Volumetric Flow 

Actual Cubic Ft per minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,019 

Actual Cubic M per second 10.33 11.53 10.73 10.86 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

10 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

1 0. Volumetric Flow 

Dry Std Cubic Ft per minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,990 

Dry Std Cubic M per second 6.65 7.49 7.08 7.08 

11. Concentration 

Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft 0.0028 0.0048 0.0023 0.0033 

Grams per Dry Std Cubic M 0.0065 0.0111 0.0053 0.0076 

11 a. Concentration Hydrogen Fluoride 

Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft < 1.20E-005 2.07E-005 < 1.17E-005 < 1.48E-005 

Grams per Dry Std Cubic M ,...----.....,, < 2.75E-005 4.75E-005 < 2.68E-005 < 3.39E-005 

12a. S02 Concentration \; 1,,1'•,,. '<. I 

Pounds per Dry Std Cubic Ft 5.14E-005 4.76E-005 5.80E-005 5.23E-005 I 

15. Particulate Mass Rate 

Pounds per Hour, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 

15a. Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate 

Pounds per Hour, #/hr < 0.0014 0.0028 < 0.0015 < 0.0019 

16. Volume at Nozzle 

Actual Cubic Feet 59.811 65.159 59.782 61.584 

Actual Cubic Meters 1.694 1.845 1.693 1.744 

17. Concentration 

Grains per Actual Cubic Ft 0.0018 0.0031 0.0015 0.0022 

Grams per Actual Cubic M 0.0042 0.0072 0.0035 0.0050 

18. lsokinetic, % 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 

I I 
II. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 

The following is a summary of the test results conducted on the Kiln Baghouse 

Exhaust Stack on September 21, 2001. For complete information see the following tables 

(Tables 1-2). 

KILN EXHAUST STACK EMISSION TESTS 

Run Number 1 

Process Rate,# 

bricklhr 26,440 

Particulate Mass 

Rate, #/hr 0.34 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Mass Rate, #/hr <1.45 

Nitrogen Oxides, 44.86 

ppm 

Sulfur Dioxide, 35.95 

grains per 100 dscf 

% 114 

2 

26,440 

0.66 

2.82 

44.83 

33.34 

11R 

' I c;. ~/' ~ 

2 

3 Average 

26,440 26,440 

0.30 0.43 

<1.51 1.44 

44.67 44.79 

40.62 36.64 

11? 

GUARDIAN BVSTEIVIS 1nc 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Stack Gas Temperature. F 270 269 273 271 

Moisture Content, % v/v 11.11 10.39 845 10.00 

Oxygen Content, % v/v 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 

Carbon Dioxide Content, % v/v 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 

Stack Gas Velocity 

Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 

Volumetric Flow 

Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,020 

Volumetric Flow 

Dry Std Cubic Feet per Minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,988 

Concentration 

Grains per Actual Cubic Foot 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 

Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 

Allowable 

Particulate Mass Rate. #/hr 19.24 19.24 19.24 19.24 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0.4 0.6 0.2 

Allowable 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 20 20 20 

Table 1 

3 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Hydrogen Fluoride Rate, #/hr ,£ 1.45 2.82 < 1.51 1.44 

% lsokinetic 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 

Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 

Allowable 

Nitrogen Oxides,ppm 300 300 300 300 

Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 35.95 33.34 40.62 36.64 

Allowable 

Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 28.63 28.63 28.63 28.63 

Table 1· Continued 

4 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS IMC 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

I GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORP. 

i #38 Kiln Emissions on September21, 2001 

:::::1 

~3~~~~~~~~~~ 

0 2.5 

I 

~ 2 

Q) 

0. 1.5 

rn 

"0 1 

c: 

:::::1 0 0.5 

a. 0 

1.45 1.51 1.44 

0.66 0.43 

2 3 Average 

Run Number 

1 • Particulate D Hydrogen Fluoride I 

Graph 1 

5 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS •nc 
 

 

GENERAL SHALE #38 KILN EXHAUST 

S02 Emissions on September 21, 2001 

• 

• ' 

Time (120 readings- 30 seconds apart) 

I • Run #1 • Run #2 • Run #3 I 

z 

c 

! 

'0 
GENERAL SHALE #38 KILN EXHAUST 

• 

• • y

 II II II Ill I 

• 

• 

NOx Emissions on September 21, 2001 

... 

Time (120 readings- 30 seconds apart) 

• Run #1 • Run #2 • Run #3 I 

11111111111111111111111.~-----" ~ 2 c( ~ ,.._ 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Barometric Pressure. in Hg 29.97 29.97 29.97 29.97 

Static Pressure. in H20 -0.24 -0.24 -0.24 -0.240 

Run Time. minutes 60 60 60 60 

Meter Volume, CF 39.624 44.765 41.757 42.049 

Meter Correction factor, MCF 0.9704 0.9704 0.9704 

Meter Volume (Corrected) 38.451 43.440 40.521 40.804 

Stack Temperature, F 270 269 273 271 

Meter Temperature, F 70 85 85 80 

Meter Pressure, in H20 1.313 1.707 1.461 1.494 

Sqr Velocity Pressure 0.523 0.585 0.545 0.551 

Mass of Particulate. mg 7.1 13.3 6.0 8.8 

Mass of Hydrogen Fluoride, mg < 30.000 57.000 < 30.000 29.250 

Ml of Water Collected 102.2 104.3 77.4 94.6 

%Oxygen 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 

% Carbon Dioxide 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

8 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Average 

9-21-01 

Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

Stack Area, Sq ft 10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 

Pilot Correction Factor 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828 

Nozzle Diameter, in 0.285 0.285 0.285 0.285 

Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 

Sulfur Dioxide, ppm 308.66 286.27 348.83 314.59 

Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0 1 0 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

9 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

1. Stack Pressure 

Inches Hg 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95 

Millimeters Hg 760.79 760.79 760.79 760.79 

2. Meter Pressure 

Inches Hg 30.07 30.10 30.08 30.08 

Millimeters Hg 763.69 764.43 763.97 764.03 

3. Meter Volume 

Dry Std Cubic Feet 38.494 42.332 39.464 40.110 

Dry Std Cubic Meters 1.090 1.199 1.118 1.136 

4. Water Volume 

Std Cubic Feet 4.811 4.909 3.643 4.454 

Std Cubic Meters 0.136 0.139 0.103 0.126 

5. Moisture Content, % 11.11 10.39 8.45 10.00 

6. Molecular Weight Dry 29.22 29.22 29.26 29.23 

7. Molecular Weight Wet 27.97 28.06 28.30 28.11 

8. Stack Velocity 

Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 

Meters per Second 10.53 11.76 10.93 11.07 

9. Volumetric Flow 

Actual Cubic Ft per minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,020 

Actual Cubic M per second 10.33 11.53 10.73 10.87 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

10 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 , 

800-738-5719 

Tunnel Kiln 38 

Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Average 

Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 

Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet 

Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 

10. Volumetric Flow 

Dry Std Cubic Ft per minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,988 

Dry Std Cubic M per second 6.65 7.49 7.08 7.07 

11. Concentration 

Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft 0.0028 0.0048 0.0023 0.0034 

Grams per Dry Std Cubic M 0.0065 0. 0111 0.0053 0.0077 

11 a. Concentration Hydrogen Fluoride 

Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft < 0.0120 0.0207 < 0.0117 0.0112 

Grams per Dry Std Cubic M < 0.0275 0.0475 < 0.0268 0.0257 

12a. S02 Concentration 

Pounds per Dry Std Cubic Ft 5.14E-005 4.76E-005 5.80E-005 5.23E-005 

15. Particulate Mass Rate 

Pounds per Hour, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 

15a. Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate 

Pounds per Hour, #/hr < 1.45 2.82 < 1.51 1.44 

16. Volume at Nozzle 

Actual Cubic Feet 59.811 65.159 59.782 61.608 

Actual Cubic Meters 1.694 1.845 1.693 1.745 

17. Concentration 

Grains per Actual Cubic Ft 0.0018 0.0031 0.0015 0.0022 

Grams per Actual Cubic M 0.0042 0.0072 0.0035 0.0050 

18. lsokinetic, % 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

II 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

Level 

Mid 

High 

Cylinder 

Value 1212m 

0.00 

249.40 

452.00 

Vendor 

soc 

soc 

-------

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

502 

Instrument setup for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Protocol Gas Identification ·----------- ------ -------

Certified Cone. Carrier Container Cylinder 

PPM Gas ~e ID# ----

249.4 Nitrogen Alu-minum CC18510 

452.0 Nitrogen Aluminum CC29440 

Response Time Determinations 

( based on 95% of span change in instrument reading ) 

Gas Cone 

0 to 452 

452 to 0 

2 times response = 

Avg time 

Time, sec 

124 

132 

128.00 sec 

256.00 sec 

Analyzer Calibration Data 

Analyzer 

Calibration 

Value pj:)l11__ 

7.70 

252.80 

451.20 

Absolute 

Difference 

7.70 

3.40 

Date of 

EXJ2iration 

1-3-03 

8-15-02 

Analyzer 

Calibration 

Error,%_ 

----------------- --------- ------cc-co::.:.~8 o=--o- _ _ ____ _ 

1.54% 

0.68% 

0.16% 

Span (ppm) 500 Allowable Value 2.00% 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

12 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

Reading 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run 1 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Date Time 

09/21/01 08:46:34 

09/21/01 08:47:04 

09/21/01 08:47:34 

09/21/01 08:48:04 

09/21/01 08:48:35 

09/21/01 08:49:04 

09/21/01 08:49:34 

09/21/01 08:50:04 

09/21/01 08:50:34 

09/21/01 08:51:04 

09/21/01 08:51:34 

09/21/01 08:52:04 

09/21/01 08:52:34 

09/21/01 08:53:04 

09/21/01 08:53:34 

09/21/01 08:54:05 

09/21/01 08:54:34 

09/21/01 08:55:04 

09/21/01 08:55:34 

09/21/01 08:56:04 

09/21/01 08:56:34 

09/21/01 08:57:04 

09/21/01 08:57:34 

09/21/01 08:58:05 

09/21/01 08:58:34 

09/21/01 08:59:04 

09/21/01 08:59:34 

09/21/01 09:00:04 

09/21/01 09:00:34 

09/21/01 09:01:04 

09/21/01 09:01:34 

09/21/01 09:02:05 

09/21/01 09:02:34 

09/21/01 09:03:04 

09/21/01 09:03:35 

09/21/01 09:04:04 

09/21/01 09:04:34 

09/21/01 09:05:04 

Uncorrected 

PPMS02 

329.09 

329.74 

331.9 

339.45 

345.28 

342.48 

297.14 

251.15 

239.6 

235.5 

235.82 

244.16 

250.4 

249.21 

250.72 

256.87 

301.35 

313.87 

295.41 

289.8 

275.66 

288.5 

301.02 

298.11 

289.26 

290.99 

295.2 

297.79 

296.06 

300.16 

303.51 

314.52 

316.57 

313.26 

310.09 

311.53 

316.79 

319.27 

13 

Corrected 

PPM S02 

335.47 

336.15 

338.41 

346.32 

352.42 

349.49 

302.02 

253.87 

241.78 

237.49 

237.82 

246.56 

253.09 

251.84 

253.42 

259.86 

306.43 

319.54 

300.21 

294.34 

279.53 

292.98 

306.08 

303.04 

293.77 

295.58 

299.99 

302.70 

300.89 

305.18 

308.69 

320.22 

322.36 

318.90 

315.58 

317.09 

322.59 

325.19 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
39 09/21/01 09:05:34 322.07 328.12 

40 09/21/01 09:06:05 325.42 331.63 

41 09/21/01 09:06:34 334.38 341.01 

42 09/21/01 09:07:04 346.79 354.00 

43 09/21/01 09:07:35 346.15 353.33 

44 09/21/01 09:08:05 346.15 353.33 

45 09/21/01 09:08:35 342.58 349.59 

46 09/21/01 09:09:05 342.04 349.03 

47 09/21/01 09:09:35 347.66 354.91 

48 09/21/01 09:10:05 347.23 354.46 

49 09/21/01 09:10:35 332.98 339.54 

50 09/21/01 09:11:05 317.54 323.38 

51 09/21/01 09:11:35 317.76 323.61 

52 09/21/01 09:12:05 319.7 325.64 

53 09/21/01 09:12:35 319.38 325.30 

54 09/21/01 09:13:05 312.14 317.72 

55 09/21/01 09:13:35 313.76 319.42 

56 09/21/01 09:14:05 322.51 328.58 

57 09/21/01 09:14:35 318.3 324.17 

58 09/21/01 09:15:05 317.22 323.04 

59 09/21/01 09:15:35 311.71 317.27 

60 09/21/01 09:16:05 318.87 324.77 

61 09/21/01 09:16:35 241.55 243.82 

62 09/21/01 09:17:05 117.94 114.42 

63 09/21/01 09:17:35 69.517 63.72 

64 09/21/01 09:18:05 52.091 45.48 

65 09/21/01 09:18:35 44.22 37.24 

66 09/21/01 09:19:05 150.07 148.05 

67 09/21/01 09:19:35 248.99 251.61 

68 09/21/01 09:20:05 285.59 289.93 

69 09/21/01 09:20:35 298.33 303.27 

70 09/21/01 09:21:05 313.9 319.57 

71 09/21/01 09:21:35 315.17 320.90 

72 09/21/01 09:22:05 314.95 320.67 

73 09/21/01 09:22:35 314.3 319.99 

74 09/21/01 09:23:05 323.26 329.37 

75 09/21/01 09:23:35 328.12 334.45 

76 09/21/01 09:24:05 324.99 331.18 

77 09/21/01 09:24:35 311.6 317.16 

78 09/21/01 09:25:05 312.36 317.95 

79 09/21/01 09:25:35 319.92 325.87 

80 09/21/01 09:26:05 324.56 330.73 

81 09/21/01 09:26:35 327.58 333.89 

82 09/21/01 09:27:05 332.44 338.98 

83 09/21/01 09:27:35 341.07 348.01 

84 09/21/01 09:28:05 351.11 358.52 

85 09/21/01 09:28:35 352.84 360.33 

86 09/21/01 09:29:05 352.95 360.45 

87 09/21/01 09:29:35 347.98 355.25 

88 09/21/01 09:30:05 351.44 358.87 

89 09/21/01 09:30:35 357.91 365.64 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 14 
90 09/21/01 09:31:05 356.73 364.41 

91 09/21/01 09:31:35 345.39 352.53 

92 09/21/01 09:32:05 325.85 332.08 

93 09/21/01 09:32:35 325.85 332.08 

94 09/21/01 09:33:05 328.55 334.90 

95 09/21/01 09:33:35 324.45 330.61 

96 09/21/01 09:34:05 314.41 320.10 

97 09/21/01 09:34:35 307.29 312.65 

98 09/21/01 09:35:05 316.39 322.17 

99 09/21/01 09:35:35 321.64 327.67 

100 09/21/01 09:36:05 322.43 328.50 

101 09/21/01 09:36:35 320.78 326.77 

102 09/21/01 09:37:05 324.56 330.73 

103 09/21/01 09:37:35 319.05 324.96 

104 09/21/01 09:38:05 316.25 322.03 

105 09/21/01 09:38:35 313.65 319.31 

106 09/21/01 09:39:05 311.71 317.27 

107 09/21/01 09:39:35 313.58 319.23 

108 09/21/01 09:40:05 317.54 323.38 

109 09/21/01 09:40:35 312.04 317.62 

110 09/21/01 09:41:05 310.74 316.26 

111 09/21/01 09:41:35 308.58 314.00 

112 09/21/01 09:42:05 313.33 318.97 

113 09/21/01 09:42:35 314.73 320.44 

114 09/21/01 09:43:05 311.93 317.50 

115 09/21/01 09:43:35 309.66 315.13 

116 09/21/01 09:44:05 314.52 320.22 

117 09/21/01 09:44:35 320.27 326.24 

118 09/21/01 09:45:05 324.45 330.61 

119 09/21/01 09:45:35 319.27 325.19 

120 09/21/01 09:46:05 316.25 322.03 

Avera9e 303.48 308.66 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Value Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 

7.70 7.60 9.70 -0.02% 0.40% 0.42% 

451.20 440.30 440.50 -2.18% -2.14% 0.04% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 308.66 

15 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run2 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Uncorrected Corrected 

Reading Date Time PPMS02 PPMS02 

1 09/21/0110:18:31 263.6 265.08 

2 09/21/01 10:19:01 262.49 263.92 

3 09/21/01 10:19:31 249.97 250.85 

4 09/21/01 10:20:01 245.97 246.67 

5 09/21/01 10:20:31 252.99 254.00 

6 09/21/01 10:21:01 259.68 260.99 

7 09/21/01 10:21:31 256.77 257.95 

8 09/21/01 10:22:01 252.37 253.35 

9 09/21/0110:22:31 253.1 254.12 

10 09/21/01 10:23:01 263.06 264.52 

11 09/21/01 10:23:31 268.35 270.04 

12 09/21/0110:24:01 268.1 269.78 

13 09/21/01 10:24:31 264.86 266.40 

14 09/21/01 10:25:01 267.99 269.66 

15 09/21/01 10:25:31 267.88 269.55 

16 09/21/01 10:26:01 264.65 266.18 

17 09/21/01 10:26:31 260.22 261.55 

18 09/21/01 10:27:01 260.22 261.55 

19 09/21/0110:27:31 264.54 266.06 

20 09/21/01 10:28:01 273.28 275.19 

21 09/21/01 10:28:31 277.71 279.81 

22 09/21/0110:29:01 280.73 282.97 

23 09/21/01 10:29:31 279.22 281.39 

24 09/21/01 10:30:01 282.24 284.55 

25 09/21/01 10:30:31 285.8 288.26 

26 09/21/01 10:31:01 286.24 288.72 

27 09/21/0110:31:31 287.1 289.62 

28 09/21/01 10:32:01 293.36 296.16 

29 09/21/01 10:32:31 299.87 302.96 

30 09/21/01 10:33:01 300.05 303.14 

31 09/21/01 10:33:31 298.54 301.57 

32 09/21/01 10:34:01 298.54 301.57 

33 09/21/01 10:34:31 301.24 304.39 

34 09/21/01 10:35:01 304.48 307.77 

35 09/21/0110:35:31 292.5 295.26 

36 09/21/01 10:36:01 269.83 271.59 

37 09/21/01 10:36:31 257.09 258.28 

38 09/21/01 10:37:01 264.43 265.95 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS •nc 

16 
39 09/21/01 10:37:31 267.48 269.13 

40 09/21/01 10:38:01 264.43 265.95 

41 09/21/01 10:38:31 265.29 266.85 

42 09/21/01 10:39:01 263.46 264.93 

43 09/21/01 10:39:31 268.64 270.34 

44 09/21/01 10:40:01 267.35 269.00 

45 09/21/01 10:40:31 264.97 266.51 

46 09/21/01 10:41:01 267.78 269.45 

47 09/21/01 10:41:31 269.83 271.59 

48 09/21/01 10:42:01 277.06 279.14 

49 09/21/01 10:42:31 272.96 274.85 

50 09/21/01 10:43:01 270.61 272.40 

51 09/21/01 10:43:31 267.24 268.88 

52 09/21/01 10:44:01 272.09 273.95 

53 09/21/01 10:44:31 274.36 276.32 

54 09/21/01 10:45:01 258.93 260.20 

55 09/21/01 10:45:31 260.33 261.67 

56 09/21/01 10:46:01 270.58 272.37 

57 09/21/01 10:46:31 272.23 274.09 

58 09/21/01 10:47:01 270.26 272.04 

59 09/21/01 10:47:31 266.91 268.54 

60 09/21/01 10:48:01 258.82 260.09 

61 09/21/01 10:48:31 261.95 263.36 

62 09/21/01 10:49:01 274.36 276.32 

63 09/21/01 10:49:31 274.47 276.43 

64 09/21/01 10:50:01 276.09 278.12 

65 09/21/01 10:50:31 274.36 276.32 

66 09/21/01 10:51:01 284.94 287.36 

67 09/21/01 10:51:31 293.04 295.82 

68 09/21/01 10:52:01 293.14 295.93 

69 09/21/01 10:52:31 288.97 291.57 

70 09/21/01 10:53:01 290.12 292.77 

71 09/21/01 10:53:31 304.91 308.22 

72 09/21/01 10:54:01 313.65 317.35 

73 09/21/01 10:54:31 312.58 316.23 

74 09/21/01 10:55:01 311.1 314.68 

75 09/21/01 10:55:31 308.69 312.17 

76 09/21/01 10:56:01 314.09 317.80 

77 09/21/01 10:56:31 308.9 312.38 

78 09/21/01 10:57:01 296.6 299.54 

79 09/21/01 10:57:31 283.54 285.90 

80 09/21/01 10:58:01 285.05 287.48 

81 09/21/01 10:58:31 285.16 287.59 

82 09/21/01 10:59:01 284.94 287.36 

83 09/21/01 10:59:31 282 67 284.99 

84 09/21/01 11:00:01 279.11 281.28 

85 09/21/01 11:00:31 280.08 282.29 

86 09/21/01 11:01:01 280.76 283.00 

87 09/21/01 11:01:31 280.51 282.74 

88 09/21/01 11:02:01 280.84 283.08 

89 09/21/01 11:02:31 278.03 280.15 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 17 
90 09/21/01 11:03:01 288.83 291.43 

91 09/21/01 11:03:31 290.55 293.22 

92 09/21/01 11:04:01 286.88 289.39 

93 09/21/01 11:04:31 285.48 287.93 

94 09/21/01 11:05:01 286.56 289.06 

95 09/21/01 11:05:31 287.56 290.10 

96 09/21/01 11:06:01 291.31 294.02 

97 09/21/01 11:06:31 291.42 294.13 

98 09/21/01 11:07:01 297.68 300.67 

99 09/21/01 11:07:31 304.51 307.80 

100 09/21/01 11:08:01 302.75 305.96 

101 09/21/01 11:08:31 298.22 301.23 

102 09/21/01 11:09:01 295.2 298.08 

103 09/21/01 11:09:31 291.96 294.70 

104 09/21/0111:10:01 295.41 298.30 

105 09/21/01 11:10:31 294.9 297.77 

106 09/21/0111:11:01 296.28 299.21 

107 09/21/0111:11:31 293.79 296.61 

108 09/21/0111:12:01 303.08 306.31 

109 09/21/01 11:12:31 306.64 310.02 

110 09/21/0111:13:01 305.45 308.78 

111 09/21/0111:13:31 300.92 304.05 

112 09/21/01 11:14:01 303.08 306.31 

113 09/21/01 11:14:31 310.23 313.77 

114 09/21/01 11:15:01 322.07 326.14 

115 09/21/01 11:15:31 327.58 331.89 

116 09/21/0111:16:01 327.51 331.82 

117 09/21/01 11:16:31 329.63 334.03 

118 09/21/0111:17:01 339.89 344.75 

119 09/21/0111:17:31 337.73 342.49 

120 09/21/0111:18:01 320.46 324.46 

Avera!le 283.89 286.27 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 

7.70 9.70 9.80 0.40% 0.42% 0.02% 

451.20 440.50 444.70 -2.14% -1.30% 0.84% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 500% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 286.27 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS tnc 

18 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

... Reading ____ ~ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run 3 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Date Time 

.~o=9~,2-=11o1 11:47:24 

09/21/01 11:47:54 

og/21/01 11:48:24 

og/21/01 11:48:54 

09/21/01 11:49:24 

09/21/0111:49:54 

09/21/0111:50:24 

09/21/01 11:50:54 

09/21/01 11:51:24 

09/21/01 11:51:54 

09/21/01 11:52:24 

09/21/0111:52:54 

09/21/01 11:53:24 

09/21/0111:53:54 

09/21/01 11:54:24 

09/21/01 11:54:54 

og/21/01 11:55:24 

09/21/01 11:55:54 

09/21/01 11:56:24 

09/21/01 11:56:54 

09/21/01 11:57:24 

09/21/01 11:57:54 

09/21/01 11 :58:24 

09/21/01 11 :58:54 

09/21/01 11:59:24 

09/21/0111:59:54 

09/21/01 12:00:24 

09/21/01 12:00:54 

09/21/01 12:01:24 

09/21/01 12:01:54 

09/21/01 12:02:24 

09/21/01 12:02:54 

09/21/01 12:03:24 

09/21/01 12:03:54 

09/21/01 12:04:24 

09/21/01 12:04:54 

09/21/01 12:05:24 

09/21/01 12:05:54 

Uncorrected 

PPMS02 

317.47 

313.11 

318.44 

324.23 

324.48 

319.48 

320.02 

333.41 

336.76 

335.14 

335.57 

339.24 

343.56 

345.82 

351.11 

354.03 

359.53 

370.43 

367.og 

364.5 

364.93 

377.38 

378.75 

377.56 

375.87 

369.03 

369.36 

351.54 

338.05 

3346 

342.26 

351.33 

348.52 

344.42 

344.85 

348.74 

342.91 

338.59 

19 

Corrected 

PPM S02 

320.76 

316.21 

321.77 

327.82 

328.08 

322.86 

323.42 

337.40 

340.90 

339.21 

339.66 

343.49 

348.00 

350.36 

355.89 

358.94 

364.68 

376.06 

372.57 

369.87 

370.32 

383.32 

384.75 

383.51 

381.74 

374.60 

374.95 

356.34 

342.25 

338.65 

346.65 

356.12 

353.18 

348.90 

349.35 

353.41 

347.33 

342.81 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
39 09/21/01 12:06:24 336.86 341.01 

40 09/21/01 12:06:54 341.22 345.56 

41 09/21/01 12:07:24 347.12 351.72 

42 09/21/01 12:07:54 347.12 351.72 

43 09121/01 12:08:24 341.86 346.23 

44 09/21/01 12:08:54 339.02 343.26 

45 09/21/01 12:09:24 341.72 346.08 

46 09/21/01 12:09:54 342.3 346.69 

47 09/21/01 12:10:24 336.47 340.60 

48 09/21/01 12:10:54 338.81 343.04 

49 09/21/01 12:11:24 338.05 342.25 

50 09/21/0112:11:54 348.31 352.96 

51 09/21/01 12:12:24 350.9 355.67 

52 09/21/01 12:12:54 348.31 352.96 

53 09/21/0112:13:24 341.4 345.75 

54 09/21/01 12:13:54 342.15 346.53 

55 09/21/01 12:14:24 346.9 351.49 

56 09/21/01 12:14:54 348.31 352.96 

57 09/21/0112:15:24 348.85 353.53 

58 09/21/01 12:15:54 350.68 355.44 

59 09/21/01 12:16:24 353.92 358.82 

60 09/21/01 12:16:54 359.42 364.57 

61 09/21/01 12:17:24 361.58 366.82 

62 09/21/01 12:17:54 363.42 368.74 

63 09/21/01 12:18:24 362.34 367.61 

64 09/21/01 12:18:54 373.67 379.45 

65 09/21/01 12:19:24 377.24 383.17 

66 09/21/01 12:19:54 371.84 377.54 

67 09/21/01 12:20:24 367.3 372.79 

68 09/21/01 12:20:54 372.05 377.75 

69 09/21/01 12:21:24 378.64 384.64 

70 09/21/01 12:21:54 366.26 371.71 

71 09/21/01 12:22:24 350.07 354.80 

72 09/21/01 12:22:54 338.91 343.15 

73 09/21/01 12:23:24 335.28 339.36 

74 09/21/01 12:23:54 342.37 346.76 

75 09/21/01 12:24:24 341.29 345.63 

76 09/21/01 12:24:54 340.53 344.84 

77 09/21/01 12:25:24 333.98 338.00 

78 09/21/01 12:25:54 340.75 345.07 

79 09/21/01 12:26:24 332.98 336.96 

80 09/21/01 12:26:54 327.04 330.75 

81 09/21/01 12:27:24 317.03 320.30 

82 09/21/01 12:27:54 319.38 322.75 

83 09/21/01 12:28:24 327.9 331.65 

84 09/21/01 12:28:54 333.3 337.29 

85 09/21/01 12:29:24 333.52 337.52 

86 09/21/01 12:29:54 336.68 340.82 

87 09/21/01 12:30:24 337.3 341.47 

88 09/21/01 12:30:54 342.58 346.98 

89 09/21/01 12:31:24 337.3 341.47 

GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc 20 
90 09/21/01 12:31:54 334.16 338.19 

91 09/21/01 12:32:24 330.49 334.36 

92 09/21/01 12:32:54 338.48 342.70 

93 09/21/01 12:33:24 343.77 348.22 

94 09/21/01 12:33:54 341.5 345.85 

95 09/21/01 12:34:24 334.27 338.30 

96 09/21/01 12:34:54 332.44 336.39 

97 09/21/01 12:35:24 339.45 343.71 

98 09/21/01 12:35:54 339.78 344.06 

99 09/21/01 12:36:24 336.86 341.01 

100 09/21/01 12:36:54 333.3 337.29 

101 09/21/01 12:37:24 337.51 341.69 

102 09/21/01 12:37:54 345.07 349.58 

103 09/21/01 12:38:24 345.39 349.91 

104 09/21/01 12:38:54 345.07 349.58 

105 09/21/01 12:39:24 346.36 350.93 

106 09/21/01 12:39:54 351.44 356.23 

107 09/21/01 12:40:24 351.11 355.89 

108 09/21/0112:40:54 346.04 350.59 

109 09/21/01 12:41:24 346.25 350.81 

110 09/21/0112:41:54 347.33 351.94 

111 09/21/01 12:42:24 353.49 358.37 

112 09/21/01 12:42:54 353.38 358.26 

113 09/21/0112:43:24 335.14 339.21 

114 09/21/01 12:43:54 329.52 333.34 

115 09/21/01 12:44:24 325.35 328.99 

116 09/21/01 12:44:54 328.44 332.22 

117 09/21/01 12:45:24 328.23 332.00 

118 09/21/01 12:45:54 325.53 329.18 

119 09/21/01 12:46:24 324.13 327.71 

120 09/21/01 12:46:54 328.88 332.67 

Averase 344.35 348.83 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 

7.70 9.80 10.80 0.42% 0.62% 0.20% 

451.20 444.70 441.60 -1.30% -1.92% -0.62% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 348.83 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

21 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

Level Vendor 

Mid soc 

High sot 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

NOx 

Instrument setup for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Protocol Gas Identification 

-C"e-rt"ifi",e'dcoC'o-n-'-'c. Carrier -'--';C'o-nc:-ta~in-er 

PPM Gas TYQE!_ 

·248.3 Nitrogen Aluminum 

Cylinder 

ID# 

XC000210B 

469.5 Nitrogen Aluminum CC95905 

Response Time Determinations 

( based on 95% of span change in instrument reading ) 

Gas Cone 

0 to 469.5 

469.5 to 0 

2 times response = 

Avg time 

Time, sec 

87 

83 

85.00 sec 

170.00 sec 

Analyzer Calibration Data 

Analyzer 

Date of 

Expiration 

10-17-02 

11-29-02 

Cylinder Calibration Absolute 

Analyzer 

Calibration 

• X~u~ ppm·==~ ~=~==· V~a~l;"tJe""c. 8Pm_ -~ _ ~-·~-------. _ _Di=ffe=r=en==c=e= ==~~-Error,%_~ 

0.00 

248.30 

469.50 

-------- Span (ppm) 

1.70 

252.40 

4 71.30 

500 

22 

1.70 

4.10 

1.80 ---------

Allowable Value 

0.34% 

0.82% 

0.36% 

2.00% 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

Reading 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run 1 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Date Time 

09/21/01 08:46:34 

09/21/01 08:47:04 

09/21/01 08:47:34 

09/21/01 08:48:04 

09/21/01 08:48:35 

09/21/01 08:49:04 

09/21/01 08:49:34 

09/21/01 08:50:04 

09/21/01 08:50:34 

09/21/01 08:51:04 

09/21/01 08:51:34 

09/21/01 08:52:04 

09/21/01 08:52:34 

09/21/01 08:53:04 

09/21/01 08:53:34 

09/21/01 08:54:05 

09/21/01 08:54:34 

09/21/01 08:55:04 

09/21/01 08:55:34 

09/21/01 08:56:04 

09/21/01 08:56:34 

09/21/01 08:57:04 

09/21/01 08:57:34 

09/21/01 08:58:05 

09/21/01 08:58:34 

09/21/01 08:59:04 

09/21/01 08:59:34 

09/21/01 09:00:04 

09/21/01 09:00:34 

09/21/01 09:01:04 

09/21/01 09:01 :34 

09/21/01 09:02:05 

09/21/01 09:02:34 

09/21/01 09:03:04 

09/21/01 09:03:35 

09/21/01 09:04:04 

09/21/01 09:04:34 

09/21/01 09:05:04 

Uncorrected 

PPM NOx 

49.589 

51.05 

47.006 

47.445 

49.594 

49.685 

42.588 

35.256 

31.991 

30.816 

30.373 

30.863 

30.003 

30.203 

31.186 

32.308 

36.583 

39.518 

42.488 

44.593 

45.876 

45.667 

46.815 

47.898 

49.859 

49.328 

46.384 

46.641 

48.867 

49.293 

48.189 

45.789 

47.737 

49.733 

50.95 

47.911 

46.984 

49.42 

23 

Corrected 

PPM NOx 

48.30 

49.77 

45.70 

46.14 

48.31 

48.40 

41.24 

33.84 

30.55 

29.37 

28.92 

29.41 

28.55 

28.75 

29.74 

30.87 

35.18 

38.14 

41.14 

43.26 

44.56 

44.34 

45.50 

46.59 

48.57 

48.04 

45.07 

45.33 

47.57 

48.00 

46.89 

44.47 

46.43 

48.45 

49.67 

46.61 

45.67 

48.13 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS tnc 
39 09/21/01 09:05:34 51.694 50.42 

40 09/21/01 09:06:05 50.811 49.53 

41 09/21/01 09:06:34 47.241 45.93 

42 09/21/01 09:07:04 48.359 47.06 

43 09/21/01 09:07:35 49.272 47.98 

44 09/21/01 09:08:05 50.65 49.37 

45 09/21/01 09:08:35 49.437 48.15 

46 09/21/01 09:09:05 47.124 45.81 

47 09/21/01 09:09:35 48.137 46.84 

48 09/21/01 09:10:05 49.759 48.47 

49 09/21/01 09:10:35 49.08 47.79 

50 09/21/01 09:11:05 46.089 44.77 

51 09/21/01 09:11:35 43.545 42.20 

52 09/21/01 09:12:05 45.001 43.67 

53 09/21/01 09:12:35 46.245 44.93 

54 09/21/01 09:13:05 47.371 46.06 

55 09/21/01 09:13:35 44.554 43.22 

56 09/21/01 09:14:05 43.936 42.60 

57 09/21/01 09:14:35 45.806 44.48 

58 09/21/01 09:15:05 46.78 45.47 

59 09/21/01 09:15:35 47.184 45.87 

60 09/21/01 09:16:05 44.58 43.25 

61 09/21/01 09:16:35 45.23 43.90 

62 09/21/01 09:17:05 43.9555 42.62 

63 09/21/01 09:17:35 41.0596 39.70 

64 09/21/01 09:18:05 40.28535 38.92 

65 09/21/01 09:18:35 35.8515 34.44 

66 09/21/01 09:19:05 36.365 34.96 

67 09/21/01 09:19:35 44.067 42.73 

68 09/21/01 09:20:05 46.663 45.35 

69 09/21/01 09:20:35 45.071 43.74 

70 09/21/01 09:21:05 44.054 42.72 

71 09/21/01 09:21:35 45.115 43.79 

72 09/21/01 09:22:05 46.55 45.24 

73 09/21/01 09:22:35 46.876 45.56 

74 09/21/01 09:23:05 43.397 42.06 

75 09/21/01 09:23:35 45.323 44.00 

76 09/21/01 09:24:05 46.119 44.80 

77 09/21/01 09:24:35 47.876 46.57 

78 09/21/01 09:25:05 46.745 45.43 

79 09/21/01 09:25:35 44.941 43.61 

80 09/21/01 09:26:05 47.032 45.72 

81 09/21/01 09:26:35 50.068 48.78 

82 09/21/01 09:27:05 50.35 49.07 

83 09/21/01 09:27:35 47.754 46.45 

84 09/21/01 09:28:05 47.789 46.49 

85 09/21/01 09:28:35 49.02 47.73 

86 09/21/01 09:29:05 50.894 49.62 

87 09/21/01 09:29:35 50.585 49.31 

88 09/21/01 09:30:05 47.015 45.70 

89 09/21/01 09:30:35 48.124 46.82 

GUARDIAN SVSTEIVIS 1nc 

24 
90 09/21/01 09:31:05 49.65 48.36 

91 09/21/01 09:31:35 50.65 49.37 

92 09/21/01 09:32:05 49.25 47.96 

93 09/21/01 09:32:35 46.493 45.18 

94 09/21/01 09:33:05 48.002 46.70 

95 09/21/01 09:33:35 49.494 48.20 

96 09/21/01 09:34:05 49.672 48.38 

97 09/21/01 09:34:35 48.045 46.74 

98 09/21/01 09:35:05 46.585 45.27 

99 09/21/01 09:35:35 48.241 46.94 

100 09/21/01 09:36:05 50.316 49.03 

101 09/21/01 09:36:35 50.946 49.67 

102 09/21/01 09:37:05 47.967 46.66 

103 09/21/01 09:37:35 48.141 46.84 

104 09/21/01 09:38:05 49.567 48.28 

105 09/21/01 09:38:35 49.528 48.24 

106 09/21/01 09:39:05 49.228 47.94 

107 09/21/01 09:39:35 46.733 45.42 

108 09/21/01 09:40:05 48.606 47.31 

109 09/21/01 09:40:35 49.937 48.65 

110 09/21/01 09:41 :05 50.576 49.30 

111 09/21/01 09:41:35 49.641 48.35 

112 09/21/01 09:42:05 48.302 47.00 

113 09/21/01 09:42:35 49.25 47.96 

114 09/21/01 09:43:05 50.95 49.67 

115 09/21/01 09:43:35 50.907 49.63 

116 09/21/01 09:44:05 48.563 47.27 

117 09/21/01 09:44:35 49.646 48.36 

118 09/21/01 09:45:05 50.202 48.92 

119 09/21/01 09:45:35 51.385 50.11 

120 09/21/01 09:46:05 51.868 50.60 

Averalle 46.18 44.86 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Value Initial . Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error, % 

1.70 2.40 1.00 0.14% -0.14% -0.28% 

471.30 471.60 462.80 0.06% -1.70% -1.76% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 44.86 

25 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

·P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run2 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Uncorrected Corrected 

Reading Date Time PPM NOx PPM NOx 

1 09/21/01 10:18:31 42.775 42.14 

2 09/21/01 10:19:01 45.006 44.41 

3 09/21/01 10:19:31 45.889 45.31 

4 09/21/01 10:20:01 47.115 46.56 

5 09/21/01 10:20:31 46.419 45.85 

6 09/21/0110:21:01 48.063 47.52 

7 09/21/0110:21:31 48.885 48.36 

8 09/21/01 10:22:01 49.646 49.13 

9 09/21/01 10:22:31 47.611 47.06 

10 09/21/0110:23:01 47.085 46.53 

11 09/21/01 10:23:31 48.646 48.12 

12 09/21/01 10:24:01 50.376 49.88 

13 09/21/0110:24:31 50.346 49.85 

14 09/21/01 10:25:01 47.998 47.46 

15 09/21/01 10:25:31 48.028 47.49 

16 09/21/01 10:26:01 48.95 48.43 

17 09/21/01 10:26:31 48.919 48.39 

18 09/21/0110:27:01 48.419 47.88 

19 09/21/01 10:27:31 46.815 46.25 

20 09/21/0110:28:01 48.428 47.89 

21 09/21/01 10:28:31 49.698 49.19 

22 09/21/01 10:29:01 48.95 48.43 

23 09/21/01 10:29:31 47.998 47.46 

24 09/21/01 10:30:01 47.932 47.39 

25 09/21/01 10:30:31 49.663 49.15 

26 09/21/0110:31:01 49.785 49.27 

27 09/21/0110:31:31 49.541 49.03 

28 09/21/01 10:32:01 47.754 47.21 

29 09/21/01 10:32:31 48.859 48.33 

30 09/21/01 10:33:01 49.711 49.20 

31 09/21/01 10:33:31 50.189 49.69 

32 09/21/01 10:34:01 49.067 48.54 

33 09/21/01 10:34:31 46.945 46.39 

34 09/21/01 10:35:01 47.35 46.80 

35 09/21/01 10:35:31 47.68 47.13 

36 09/21/01 10:36:01 46.91 46.35 

37 09/21/01 10:36:31 46 071 45.50 

38 09/21/01 10:37:01 44.923 44.33 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 26 
39 09/21/01 10:37:31 45.541 44.96 

40 09/21/01 10:38:01 46.293 45.72 

41 09/21/01 10:38:31 46.876 46.32 

42 09/21/0110:39:01 45.175 44.58 

43 09/21/01 10:39:31 44.671 44.07 

44 09/21/01 10:40:01 45.219 44.63 

45 09/21/01 10:40:31 46.645 46.08 

46 09/21/01 10:41:01 46.75 46.19 

47 09/21/01 10:41:31 44.614 44.01 

48 09/21/01 10:42:01 44.914 44.32 

49 09/21/01 10:42:31 46.432 45.86 

50 09/21/01 10:43:01 46.772 46.21 

51 09/21/01 10:43:31 45.954 45.38 

52 09/21/01 10:44:01 43.901 43.29 

53 09/21/01 10:44:31 45.11 44.52 

54 09/21/01 10:45:01 46.945 46.39 

55 09/21/01 10:45:31 48.624 48.09 

56 09/21/0110:46:01 46.506 45.94 

57 09/21/01 10:46:31 45.397 44.81 

58 09/21/01 10:47:01 46.35 45.78 

59 09/21/01 10:47:31 46.689 46.12 

60 09/21/01 10:48:01 46.728 46.16 

61 09/21/01 10:48:31 44.871 44.28 

62 09/21/01 10:49:01 45.728 45.15 

63 09/21/01 10:49:31 47.493 46.94 

64 09/21/01 10:50:01 47.619 47.07 

65 09/21/01 10:50:31 47.954 47.41 

66 09/21/01 10:51:01 46.223 45.65 

67 09/21/01 10:51:31 47.371 46.82 

68 09/21/01 10:52:01 49.067 48.54 

69 09/21/01 10:52:31 49.381 48.86 

70 09/21/01 10:53:01 48.024 47.48 

71 09/21/01 10:53:31 47.798 47.25 

72 09/21/01 10:54:01 50.054 49.55 

73 09/21/01 10:54:31 51.407 50.92 

74 09/21/01 10:55:01 51.034 50.55 

75 09/21/01 10:55:31 48.137 47.60 

76 09/21/01 10:56:01 48.511 47.98 

77 09/21/01 10:56:31 49.659 49.15 

78 09/21/01 10:57:01 49.646 49.13 

79 09/21/01 10:57:31 49.215 48.69 

80 09/21/01 10:58:01 47.01 46.45 

81 09/21/01 10:58:31 48.554 48.02 

82 09/21/01 10:59:01 50.05 49.54 

83 09/21/01 10:59:31 50.846 50.35 

84 09/21/01 11:00:01 49.285 48.77 

85 09/21/01 11:00:31 47.002 46.44 

86 09/21/01 11:01:01 49.351 48.83 

87 09/21/01 11:01:31 50.011 49.50 

88 09/21/01 11:02:01 50.772 50.28 

89 09/21/01 11:02:31 48.519 47.99 

GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc 

27 
90 09/21/01 11:03:01 48.241 47.70 

91 09/21/01 11:03:31 50.459 49.96 

92 09/21/01 11:04:01 50.955 50.46 

93 09/21/01 11:04:31 50.472 49.97 

94 09/21/01 11:05:01 47.967 47.43 

95 09/21/01 11:05:31 48.459 47.93 

96 09/21/01 11:06:01 49.498 48.98 

97 09/21/0111:06:31 51.337 50.85 

98 09/21/01 11:07:01 50.607 50.11 

99 09/21/01 11:07:31 49.781 49.27 

100 09/21/01 11:08:01 50.054 49.55 

101 09/21/01 11:08:31 51.885 51.41 

102 09/21/01 11:09:01 52.485 52.02 

103 09/21/0111:09:31 49.376 48.86 

104 09/21/01 11:10:01 48.885 48.36 

105 09/21/01 11:10:31 50.033 49.53 

106 09/21/01 11:11:01 50.95 50.46 

107 09/21/0111:11:31 52.12 51.65 

108 09/21/0111:12:01 49.146 48.62 

109 09/21/01 11:12:31 49.598 49.08 

110 09/21/01 11:13:01 51.707 51.23 

111 09/21/0111:13:31 52.39 51.92 

112 09/21/01 11:14:01 51.955 51.48 

113 09/21/01 11:14:31 48.524 47.99 

114 09/21/01 11:15:01 49.05 48.53 

115 09/21/0111:15:31 50.294 49.79 

116 09/21/01 11:16:01 52.017 51.55 

117 09/21/0111:16:31 50.25 49.75 

118 09/21/0111:17:01 49.063 48.54 

119 09/21/01 11:17:31 49.867 49.36 

120 09/21/01 11:18:01 48.915 48.39 

Avera9e 48.36 47.83 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error.% Error,% Error,% Error,% 

1.70 1.00 1.70 -0.14% 0.00% 0.14% 

471.30 462.80 462.90 -1.70% -1.68% 0.02% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 47.83 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS enc 

28 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

. P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Run 3 

Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 

9-21-01 

Uncorrected Corrected 

Reading Date Time PPM NOx PPM NOx 

1 09/21/0111:47:24 47.333 46.08 

2 09/21/01 11:47:54 46.363 45.10 

3 09/21/01 11 :48:24 44.745 43.46 

4 09/21/01 11:48:54 46.623 45.36 

5 09/21/01 11:49:24 48.163 46.92 

6 09/21/01 11:49:54 48.385 47.15 

7 09/21/0111:50:24 46.097 44.83 

8 09/21/0111:50:54 45.797 44.53 

9 09/21/01 11:51:24 47.206 45.95 

10 09/21/01 11:51:54 47.993 46.75 

11 09/21/01 11:52:24 47.78 46.53 

12 09/21/01 11:52:54 45.789 44.52 

13 09/21/0111:53:24 45.871 44.60 

14 09/21/0111:53:54 47.954 46.71 

15 09/21/01 11:54:24 49.046 47.82 

16 09/21/0111:54:54 48.106 46.86 

17 09/21/0111:55:24 47.063 45.81 

18 09/21/01 11:55:54 48.554 47.32 

19 09/21/01 11:56:24 49.133 47.91 

20 09/21/0111:56:54 48.967 47.74 

21 09/21/01 11:57:24 46.689 45.43 

22 09/21/01 11:57:54 46.467 45.20 

23 09/21/01 11:58:24 46.793 45.53 

24 09/21/0111:58:54 49.167 47.94 

25 09/21/0111:59:24 50.638 49.43 

26 09/21/01 11:59:54 47.241 45.99 

27 09/21/01 12:00:24 46.61 45.35 

28 09/21/0112:00:54 45.271 43.99 

29 09/21/0112:01:24 44.575 43.29 

30 09/21/0112:01:54 44.123 42.83 

31 09/21/01 12:02:24 42.497 41.18 

32 09/21/0112:02:54 43.727 42.43 

33 09/21/01 12:03:24 45.141 43.86 

34 09/21/01 12:03:54 45.797 44.53 

35 09/21/01 12:04:24 44.928 43.65 

36 09/21/01 12:04:54 43.697 42.40 

37 09/21/01 12:05:24 43.371 42.07 

38 09/21/01 12:05 54 44.462 43.17 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 29 
39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

76 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

09/21/01 12:06:24 

09/21/01 12:06:54 

09/21/01 12:07:24 

09121/01 12:07:54 

09/21/01 12:08:24 

09/21/01 12:08:54 

09121/01 12:09:24 

09/21/01 12:09:54 

09/21/01 12:10:24 

09/21/01 12:10:54 

09121/0112:1.1:24 

09/21/0112:11:54 

09/21/01 12:12:24 

09/21/01 12:12:54 

09/21/01 12:13:24 

09/21/01 12:13:54 

09/21/01 12:14:24 

09/21/01 12:14:54 

09/21/01 12:15:24 

09/21/0112:15:54 

09/21/01 12:16:24 

09/21/01 12:16:54 

09/21/01 12:17:24 

09/21/0112:17:54 

09/21/01 12:18:24 

09/21/0112:18:54 

09/21/01 12:19:24 

09/21/01 12:19:54 

09/21/01 12:20:24 

09/21/01 12:20:54 

09/21/01 12:21:24 

09/21/01 12:21:54 

09/21/01 12:22:24 

09121/01 12:22:54 

09/21/01 12:23:24 

09/21/01 12:23:54 

09/21/01 12:24:24 

09/21/01 12:24:54 

09/21/01 12:25:24 

09/21/01 12:25:54 

09/21/01 12:26:24 

09/21/01 12:26:54 

09/21/01 12:27:24 

09/21/01 12:27:54 

09/21/01 12:28:24 

09/21/01 12:28:54 

09/21/01 12:29:24 

09/21/01 12:29:54 

09/21/01 12:30:24 

09/21/01 12:30:54 

09/21/01 12:31 :24 

44.923 

44.014 

42.318 

44.488 

45.106 

45.349 

42.897 

42.958 

44.51 

45.232 

43.514 

43.219 

44.332 

45.336 

45.884 

44.032 

43.323 

44.14 

45.819 

46.384 

45.984 

46.554 

47.228 

48.419 

47.389 

45.876 

47.902 

48.698 

49.05 

47.584 

47.719 

47.541 

47.011 

47.315 

45.076 

45.976 

47.832 

49.38 

48.998 

46.432 

47.284 

48.511 

49.02 

47.119 

45.306 

46.541 

48.502 

49.929 

46.637 

47.393 

48.867 

30 

43.64 

42.72 

41.00 

43.20 

43.83 

44.07 

41.59 

41.65 

43.22 

43.95 

42.21 

41.91 

43.04 

44.06 

44.61 

42.74 

42.02 

42.85 

44.55 

45.12 

44.71 

45.29 

45.98 

47.18 

46.14 

44.61 

46.66 

47.46 

47.82 

46.34 

46.47 

46.29 

45.76 

46.06 

43.80 

44.71 

46.59 

48.16 

47.77 

45.17 

46.03 

47.28 

47.79 

45.86 

44.03 

45.28 

47.27 

48.71 

45.38 

46.14 

47.64 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
90 09/21/01 12:31:54 49.507 48.28 

91 09121/01 12:32:24 48.946 47.72 

92 09/21/01 12:32:54 47.197 45.94 

93 09/21/01 12:33:24 47.845 46.60 

94 09121/01 12:33:54 49.607 48.39 

95 09/21/01 12:34:24 50.681 49.47 

96 09/21/01 12:34:54 49.02 47.79 

97 09/21/01 12:35:24 47.445 46.20 

98 09/21/01 12:35:54 48.228 46.99 

99 09/21/01 12:36:24 49.393 48.17 

100 09121/01 12:36:54 51.059 49.86 

101 09/21/01 12:37:24 48.906 47.68 

102 09/21/01 12:37:54 48.285 47.05 

103 09/21/01 12:38:24 49.767 48.55 

104 09/21/01 12:38:54 51.911 50.72 

105 09121/01 12:39:24 50.594 49.39 

106 09121/01 12:39:54 48.267 47.03 

107 09/21/01 12:40:24 49.293 48.07 

108 09/21/01 12:40:54 50.281 49.07 

109 09/21/01 12:41:24 50.581 49.37 

110 09/21/01 12:41:54 50.228 49.01 

111 09/21/01 12:42:24 48.741 47.51 

112 09/21/01 12:42:54 48.402 47.16 

113 09/21/01 12:43:24 48.132 46.89 

114 09/21/01 12:43:54 46.145 44.88 

115 09/21/01 12:44:24 45.615 44.34 

116 09/21/01 12:44:54 44.136 42.84 

117 09121/01 12:45:24 45.145 43.86 

118 09/21/01 12:45:54 47.263 46.01 

119 09121/01 12:46:24 47.35 46.10 

120 09/21/01 12:46:54 44.645 43.36 

Average 46.93 45.67 

System Calibration Bias and Drift Data 

Analyzer Initial Final 

Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift 

Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 

1.70 1.70 2.00 0.00% 0.06% 0.06% 

471.30 462.90 467.60 -1.68% -0.74% 0.94% 

Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 

Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 45.67 

31 

GUARCIIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Ill. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

General 

All sampling and analytical procedures for the determination of the particulate 

emissions from these sources were conducted in strict adherence with the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1-4, 6C, ?E, 9 & 26a, as amended. 

The sampling equipment used in these tests was manufactured by Nuetech Corporation 

and was properly calibrated before and after these tests (See Calibrations). The 

particulate mass was determined gravimetrically after removal of the uncombined water. 

The hydrogen fluoride mass was determined by ion chromatography (I C). 

METHOD 1 

"To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total 

volumetric flow rate from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent 

stream is flowing in a known direction is selected, and the cross-section of the stack is 

divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then located within each of these 

equal areas. This method is applicable to flowing gas streams in ducts, stacks, and flues. 

The method cannot be used when: (1) flow is cyclonic or swirling, (2) a stack is smaller 

than about 0.30 meter (12 in.) in diameter, or 0.071 m2 (113 in2

) in cross-sectional area, 

or (3) the measurement site is less than two stack or duct diameters downstream or less 

than a half diameter upstream from a flow disturbance. 

Sampling or velocity measurement is performed at a site located at least eight stack 

or duct diameters downstream and two diameters upstream from any flow disturbance 

such as a bend, expansion, or contraction in the stack, or from a visible flame. If 

necessary, an alternative location may be selected, at a position at least two stack or duct 

diameters downstream and a half diameter upstream from any flow disturbance. 

For a rectangular cross section, an equivalent diameter (D.) shall be calculated from 

the following equation, to determine the upstream and downstream distances: 

0 = e 

2LW 

L+W 

where L = length and W = width."' 

This method was used to select the number of sampling points and the required 

sampling matrix. The dimensions of the sample locations (see Figure 1 ) indicated that 

12 points would be required to sample the Kiln exhaust stack. We sampled 6 points per 

'Method 1 -Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

32 
port for five minutes a point for the test. Verification of absence of cyclonic flow was not 

determined because cyclonic flow did not seem to exist from the stack exhaust. 

METHOD2 

"The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from 

measurement of the average velocity head with a TypeS (Stausscheibe or reverse type) 

pitot tube. This method is applicable for measurement of the average velocity of a gas 

stream and for quantifying gas flow. This procedure is not applicable at measurement sites 

that fail to meet the criteria of Method 1. Also, the method cannot be used for direct 

measurement in cyclonic or swirling gas streams. ltWJen unacceptable conditions exist, 

alternative procedures, subject to the approval of the Administrator. U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, must be employed to make accurate flow rate determinations; 

examples of such alternative procedures are: (1) to install straightening vanes; (2) to 

calculate the total volumetric flow rate stoichiometrically, or (3) to move to another 

measurement site at which the flow is acceptable. 

Specifications for the apparatus are given below. Any other apparatus that has 

been demonstrated (subject to approval of the Administrator) to be capable of meeting the 

specifications will be considered acceptable. Pitot tube made of metal tubing (e.g., 

stainless steel). It is recommended that the external tubing diameter be between 0.48 and 

0. 95 em (3/16 and 318 inch). There shall be an equal distance from the base of each leg 

oft he pitot tube to its face-opening plane; it is recommended that this distance be between 

1.05 and 1.50 times the external tubing diameter. The TypeS pitot tube shall have a 

known coefficient. An inclined manometer or equivalent device. Most sampling trains are 

equipped with a 1 0-in. (water column) inclined-vertical manometer. having 0. 01-in. H20 

divisions on the 0- to l-in. inclined scale, and 0.1-in. H20 divisions on the 1- to 10-in. vertical 

scale. This type of manometer (or other gauge of equivalent sensitivity) is satisfactory for 

the measurement of r.p values as low as 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HzO. However, a differential 

pressure gauge of greater sensitivity shall be used (subject to the approval of the 

Administrator), if any of the following is found to be true: (1) the arithmetic average of all 

!Jp readings at the traverse points in the stack is less than 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HzO,· (2) for 

traverses of 12 or more points, more than 10 percent of the individual !Jp readings are 

below 1. 3 mm (0. 05 in.) H20; (3) for traverses offewer than 12 points, more than one !Jp 

reading is below 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HP "' 

Velocity readings were taken with a properly calibrated S type pilot tube and a 0-

10.0 inch inclined-vertical manometer; which had 0.01 inch H20 divisions on the Oto 1 inch 

inclined scale, and 0.1 inch HP divisions on the 1 to 10 inch vertical scale for the dryer 

stack. A micromanometer (0-0.25 inch scale), having 0.001 inch H20 divisions on the 0 

to 0.25 inch inclined scale was used on the exhaust stack due to the sufficient number of 

the low velocity pressures as specified in Method 2. 

2

Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pilot 

Tube), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

33 
METHOD3 

"This method is applicable for determining carbon dioxide (CO.) and oxygen (0.) 

concentrations and dry molecular weight of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel 

combustion process. The method may also be applicable to other processes where it has 

been determined that compounds other than C02, 02, carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen 

(NJ are not present in concentrations sufficient to affect the results. A gas sample is 

extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; 

(2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas 

sample is analyzed for percent C02, percent 02, and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry 

molecular weight determination, either an Orsat or a Fyrite analyzer may be used for the 

analysis .. a 

Gas composition for CO 2, 0 2, and N 2 by difference was performed twice during 

each particulate test by using the grab sample technique and analyzed with a Hays Orsat 

Gas Analyzer (0-50% scale with 0.2% divisions). 

METHOD4 

"A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed 

from the sample stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This 

method is applicable for determining the moisture content of stack gas. 

Two procedures are given. The first is a reference method, for accurate determinations of moisture content (such as are needed to calculate emission data). The second is 

an approximation method, which provides estimates of percent moisture to aid in setting 

isokinetic sampling rates prior to a pollutant emission measurement run. The approximation method described herein is only a suggested approach; alternative means for 

approximating the moisture content, e.g., drying tubes, wet bulb-dry bulb techniques, 

condensation techniques, stoichiometric calculations, previous experience, etc., are also 

acceptable. 

The reference method is often conducted simultaneously with a pollutant emission 

measurement run; when it is, calculation of percent isokinetic, pollutant emission rate, etc., 

for the run shall be based upon the results of the reference method or its equivalent; these 

calculations shall not be based upon the results of the approximation method, unless the 

approximation method is shown, to the satisfaction of the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to be capable of yielding results within I percent H20 of the reference 

method. 

The reference method may yield questionable results when applied to saturated gas 

streams or to streams that contain water droplets. Therefore, when these conditions exist 

or are suspected, a second determination of the moisture content shall be made simultaneously with the reference method, as follows: Assume that the gas stream is saturated. 

Attach a temperature sensor [capable of measuring to within fC (Z'F)] to the reference 

method probe. Measure the stack gas temperature at each traverse point during the 

reference method traverse; calculate the average stack gas temperature. Next, determine 

the moisture percentage, either by: (0 using a psychometric chart and making appropriate 

3

Method 3 - Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1. 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

34 
corrections if stack pressure is different from that of the chart, or (2) using saturation vapor 

pressure tables."' 

The moisture content of the stack gases was determined in conjunction with each 

Method 26a test by measuring the amount of water collected in the impingers, condenser 

and the increase in weight of the silica gel. These weights were combined to give the total 

amount of water collected. 

METHOD 6C 

"This method is applicable to the determination of sulfur dioxide (SO.} concentrations in controlled and uncontrolled emissions from stationary sources only when specified 

within the regulations. A gas sample is continuously extracted from a stack, and a portion 

of the sample is conveyed to an instrumental analyzer for determination of S02 gas 

concentration using an ultraviolet (UV), nondispersive infrared (NDJR), or fluorescence 

analyzer. Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure reliable 

data. 

The analytical range is determined by the instrumental design. For this method, a 

portion of the analytical range is selected by choosing the span of the monitoring system. 

The span of the monitoring system shall be selected such that the pollutant gas 

concentration equivalent to the emission standard is not Jess than 30 percent of the span. 

If at any time during a run the measured gas concentration exceeds the span, the run shall 

be considered invalid. 

The minimum detectable limit depends on the analytical range, span, and signal-tonoise ratio of the measurement system. For a well designed system, the minimum 

detectable limit should be less than 2 percent of the span. 

Span. The upper limit of the gas concentration measurement range displayed on 

the data recorder. 

Calibration Gas. A known concentration of a gas in an appropriate diluent gas. 

Analyzer Calibration E"or. The difference between the gas concentration exhibited 

by the gas analyzer and the known concentration of the calibration gas when the calibration 

gas is introduced directly to the analyzer. 

Sampling System Bias. The difference between the gas concentrations exhibited 

by the measurement system when a known concentration gas is introduced at the outlet 

of the sampling probe and when the same gas is introduced directly to the analyzer. 

Zero Drift. The difference in the measurement system output reading from the initial 

calibration response at the zero concentration level after a stated period of operation during 

which no unscheduled maintenance, repair, or adjustment took place. 

Calibration Drift. The difference in the measurement system output reading from 

the initial calibration response at a mid-range calibration value after a stated period of 

operation during which no unscheduled maintenance, repair, or adjustment took place. 

Response Time. The amount of time required for the measurement system to 

display 95 percent of a step change in gas concentration on the data recorder. 

4

Method 4 - Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

35 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Interference Check. A method for detecting analytical interferences and excessive 

biases through direct comparison of gas concentrations provided by the measurement 

system and by a modified Method 6 procedure. For this check, the modified Method 6 

samples are acquired at the sample by-pass discharge vent.,.; 

General 

The sampling train consisted of a sample probe, heated sampling line, calibration 

valve assembly, a condenser to remove condensate from the sample gas while maintaining 

minimal contact between any condensate and the sample gas, particulate filter, sample 

pump, sample flow rate control, sample gas manifold, S02 analyzer (Horiba VIA-51 0 serial 

# 4278) and a Fluke Data Logger (2625a/6204605). See Figure 4. 

The following measurement system performance specifications were complied with 

during these tests: 

1. Analyzer Calibration Error- Less than± 2% of the span for the zero, mid-range, 

and high-range calibration gases. 

2. Sampling System Bias - Less than± 5% of the span for the zero, and mid- or 

high-range calibration gases. 

3. Zero Drift - Less than±. 3% of the span over the period of each run. 

4. Calibration Drift - Less than ± 3% of the span over the period of each run. 

Measurement System Preparation 

The system was assembled by following the manufacturer's written instruction for 

preparing and preconditioning the gas analyzer and the other system components. 

Various calibration gases were then introduced and all necessary adjustments were made 

to calibrate the analyzer and the data recorder. 

Then an analyzer calibration error check was conducted by introducing calibration 

gases to the measurement system at the back of the analyzer and all measurements were 

less than± 2% of the span for any ofthe calibration gases. Next the sampling system bias 

check was conducted by introducing calibration gases at the calibration valve installed at 

the outlet of the sampling probe. A zero, mid-range, and high-range gas were introduced. 

During this check, the system was operated at the normal sampling rate, and no 

adjustments to the measurement system other than those necessary to achieve proper 

5

Method 6C - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources ( 

Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

36 
calibration gas flow rates to the analyzer was done. The response time was determined 

during this check. All measurements were less than.± 5% of the span for either the zero 

or upscale calibration gas. 

Emission Test Procedure 

The probe was positioned at the sampling location and sampling began at the same 

rate as used during the system calibration drift test. A constant sampling rate was 

maintained during the entire run. The sampling time per run was 60 minutes, and data was 

not collected until twice the system response time had elapsed. Immediately following 

each run, the sampling system bias check was redone without making any adjustments to 

the measurement system. All values were within acceptable limits. The average of the 

initial and final bias check values were used to calculate the gas concentration for the run. 

An inference check for this source category was determined at an earlier date using a 

modified method 6. The results of the modified method 6 were compared to the results 

taken at the same time for method 6c. The difference was less than or equal 7%. 

METHOD7E 

"This method is applicable to the determination of nitrogen oxides (NO,J concentrations in emissions from stationary sources only when specified within the regulations. A 

sample is continuously extracted from the effluent stream; a portion ofthe sample stream 

is conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination of NO, 

concentration. Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure 

reliable data. Range and sensitivity is the same as in Method 6C. The Sample Interface, 

Gas Analyzer, and Data Recorder are the same as in Method 6C. A N02 to NO Converter 

is a device that converts the nitrogen dioxide (NO.) in the sample gas to nitrogen oxide 

(NO). The Span, Calibration Gas, Analyzer Calibration Error, Sampling System Bias, Zero 

Drift, Calibration Drift, and Response Time are the same as in Method 6C. "

6 

General 

The sampling train consisted of a sample probe, heated sampling line, calibration 

valve assembly, a refrigerator-type condenser to remove condensate from the sample gas 

while maintaining minimal contact between any condensate and the sample gas, 

particulate filter, sample pump, sample flow rate control, sample gas manifold, NO, 

6

Method 7E- Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, 

Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

37 
analyzer (Beckman 921A NO/NOx Analyzer serial# 0100084) and a Fluke Data Logger 

(2625a/6205604 ). See Figure 5. 

Upon receipt of the NOx Analyzer an interference response test was conducted 

using 500 ppm CO, 200 ppm S02 , 10.5% C02, and 20.7% 0 2• These gases were 

introduced as a gas mixture to the analyzer and the total interference response was Jess 

than 2% of the span value of 249 ppm NOx. 

Before field use the N02 to NO conversion efficiency was determined by adding gas 

from the mid-level NO in N2 (505 ppm) to a clean, evacuated, leak-tight Tedlar bag. This 

gas was diluted approximately 1:1 with 20.9%02, purified air. The bag was immediately 

attached to the calibration valve assembly and sampling begun, recording the NOx 

response for 30 minutes. The N02 to NO conversion was 100% as the instrument 

response was stable at the highest peak value observed and did not decrease more than 

2.0% of the highest peak value. ! 

The following measurement system performance specifications were complied with 

during these tests: 

1. Analyzer Calibration Error - Less than.± 2% of the span for the zero, 

mid-range, and high-range calibration gases. 

2. Sampling System Bias - Less than .± 5% of the span for the zero, and 

mid or high range calibration gases. 

3. Zero Drift- Less than.± 3% of the span over the period of each run. 

4. Calibration Drift - Less than .± 3% of the span over the period of each 

run. 

Measurement System Preparation 

The system was assembled by following the manufacturer's written instruction for 

preparing and preconditioning the gas analyzer and the other system components. 

Various calibration gases were then introduced and all necessary adjustments were made 

to calibrate the analyzer and the data recorder. 

Then an analyzer calibration error check was conducted by introducing calibration 

gases to the measurement system at the back of the analyzer and all measurements were 

less than.± 2% of the span for any of the calibration gases. Next the sampling system bias 

check was conducted by introducing calibration gases at the calibration valve installed at 

the outlet of the sampling probe. A zero, mid-range, and high-range gas was introduced. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

38 
During this check, the system was operated at the normal sampling rate, and no adjustments to the measurement system other than those necessary to achieve proper 

calibration gas flow rates to the analyzer were done. The response time was determined 

during this check. All measurements were less than .± 5% of the span for either the zero 

or upscale calibration gas. 

Emission Test Procedure 

The probe was positioned at the sampling location and sampling began at the same 

rate as used during the system calibration drift test. A constant sampling rate was 

maintained during the entire run. The sampling time per run was 60 minutes, and data was 

not collected until twice the system response time had elapsed. Immediately following 

each run, the sampling system bias check was redone without making any adjustments to 

the measurement system. All values were within acceptable limits. The average of the 

initial and final bias check values were used to calculate the gas concentration for the run. 

METHOD 9 

"Many stationary sources discharge visible emissions into the atmosphere; these 

emissions are usually in the shape of a plume. This method involves the determination of 

plume opacity by qualified observers. The methods includes procedures for the training 

and certification of observers and procedures to be used in the field for determination of 

plume opacity. 

The appearance of a plume as viewed by an observer depends upon a number of 

variables, some of which may be controllable in the field. Variables which can be 

controlled to an extent.to which they no longer exert a significant influence upon plume 

appearance include: angle of the observer with respect to the plume; angle of the observer 

with respect to the sun; point of observation of attached and detached steam plume; and 

angle of the observer with respect to a plume emitted from a rectangular stack with a large 

length to width ratio. The method includes specific criteria applicable to these variables. 

Other variables which may not be controllable in the field are luminescence and 

color contrast between the plume and the background against which the plume is viewed. 

These variables exert an influence upon the appearance of a plume as viewed by an 

observer and can affect the ability of the observer to assign accurately opacity values to 

the observed plume. Studies of the theory of plume opacity and field studies have 

demonstrated that a plume is most visible and presents the greatest apparent opacity when 

viewed against a contrasting background. Accordingly, the opacity of a plume viewed 

under conditions where a contrasting background is present can be assigned with the 

greatest degree of accuracy. However, the potential for a positive error is also the greatest 

when a plume is viewed under such contrasting conditions. Under conditions presenting 

a less contrasting background, the apparent opacity of a plume is less and approaches 

zero as the color and luminescence contrast decrease toward zero. As a result, significant 

negative bias and negative errors can be made when a plume is viewed under less 

contrasting conditions. A negative bias decreases rather than increases the possibility that 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS IMC 

39 
a plant operator will be incorrectly cited for a violation of opacity standards as a result of 

obseNer error. 

Studies have been undertaken to determine the magnitude of positive errors made 

by qualified obseNers while reading plumes under contrasting conditions and using the 

procedures set forth in this method. The results of these studies (field trials) which involve 

a total of 769 sets of 25 readings each are as follows: 

(1) For black plumes (133 sets at a smoke generator), 100 percent of the sets were read 

with a positive error of less than 7. 5 percent opacity; 99 percent were read with a positive 

error of Jess than 5 percent opacity. (Note: For a set, positive error = average opacity 

determined by obseNers' 25 obseNations -average opacity determined from 

transmissometer's 25 recordings.) 

(2) For white plumes (170 sets at a smoke generator, 168 sets at a coal-fired power plant, 

298 sets at a sulfuric acid plant), 99 percent of the sets were read with a positive error of 

less than 7.5 percent opacity; 95 percent were read with a positive error of less than 5 

percent opacity. 

The positive obseNational error associated with an average of twenty-five readings 

is therefore established. The accuracy of the method must be taken into account when 

determining possible violations of applicable opacity standards. 

PROCEDURES 

Position. The qualified obseNer shall stand at a distance sufficient to provide a clear 

view of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140 o sector to his back. Consistent with 

maintaining the above requirement, the obseNer shall, as much as possible, make his 

obseNations from a position such that his line of vision is approximately perpendicular to 

the plume direction and, when obseNing opacity of emissions from rectangular outlets 

(e. g., roof monitors, open baghouses, noncircular stacks), approximately perpendicular to 

the longer axis of the outlet. The obseNer's line of sight should not include more than one 

plume at a time when multiple stacks are involved, and in any case the obseNer should 

make his obseNations with his line of sight perpendicular to the longer axis of such a set 

of multiple stacks (e.g., stub stacks on baghouses). 

The obseNer shall record the name of the plant, emission location, facility type, 

obseNer's name and affiliation, and the date on a field data sheet (Figure 9-1). The time, 

estimated distance to the emission location, approximate wind direction, estimated wind 

speed, description of the sky condition (presence and color of clouds), and plume 

background are recorded on a field data sheet at the time opacity readings are initiated and 

completed. "

7 

Three (3) one hour readings were performed on this source by Mr. Terry Gaither, 

an ADEM certified VE reader, #3433. A position with a clear view of the emissions was 

chosen with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back. 

7

Method 9 - Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources, 

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

40 
METHOD26A 

"This method is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides and 

halogens from stationary sources. Gaseous and particulate pollutants are withdrawn 

isokinetically from the source and collected in an optional cyclone, on a filter , and in 

absorbing solutions. If desired, the particulate matter recovered from the filter and the 

probe is analyzed following the procedures in Method 5. '

6 

Sampling Techniques 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. A 

HP Palmtop 200LX computer and a HP-20S were used to calculate the sampling rate for 

isokinetic sampling. The particulate determinations were made by utilizing the sample 

train in Figure 3. The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and 

final leak checks of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in 

Method 5 and were recorded on the data sheets (See Field Data). The nozzle (glass with 

an angle of taper of 30 degrees and of button hook design) was calibrated before and after 

each test using a micrometer and was also recorded on the data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling 

time of 60 minutes. The gases were drawn through a glass nozzle attached to a heated 

glass lined probe. The probe was maintained at the proper setting to obtain an exit 

temperature of 248 .:': 25 ° F (See Calibrations). The gases then proceeded through 

borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through a quartz fiber filter 

(Pallflex) to remove particulate matter. The filter was maintained at a temperature of 248 

.:': 25 ° F. These temperatures were recorded at each point on the data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers to capture 

hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. (The optional first impinger for a knockout 

for moisture was not used.) The first and second impingers contained approximately 100 

ml of a 0.1 N H2S04 solution and were ofthe Greenburg-Smith design. The third impinger 

contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution and was of the modified 

Greenburg-Smith design, and the fourth contained approximately 200 grams of silica gel. 

'Method 26A- Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From Stationary 

Sources - lsokinetic Method, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, 

July 1, 2000. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS tnc 

41 
The gases then pass through a condenser placed in an ice bath to maintain a maximum 

exit temperature of 68 ° F. This temperature was also recorded on the data sheets. The 

gases then pass through a pre-weighed drying column filled with indicating silica gel to 

remove any remaining moisture. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box 

where the gas flow and temperature were measured. (See Field Data) 

WITH NO VISIBLE MOISTURE PRESENT, THIS PROCEDURE WAS NOT USED 

DURING THESE TESTS. Upon completion of the sampling and the final leak checks, the 

ambient air conditioning tube was connected at the probe inlet and the sample train 

operated with the filter heating system at 248 + 25 °F at a flow rate of ah = 1 inch H20 to 

vaporize any liquid and hydrogen halides in the cyclone or on the filter and pull them 

through the train into the impingers. After 30 minutes, the flow was turned off, and the 

cyclone and filter were examined for any visible moisture. If any moisture was visible, this 

process was repeated for 15 minutes. 

After the post-test moisture removal procedure, the sampling train and the probe 

nozzle assembly was transferred to the cleanup area making sure no particulate was lost. 

The cleanup data was recorded on Particulate Sample Recovery and Integrity Sheet 

located in the Field Data Section. 

Particulate catches were placed in sealed petri dishes. Each acetone rinse from 

the nozzle, probe, and filter holder was combined and placed in a sealed container. For 

the group of tests an acetone blank of approximately 200 milliliters was placed in a sealed 

container. The first and second impinger contents were transferred to its tared container, 

weighed and the rinsings from the glassware were added to this container. The third 

impinger was transferred to its respective tared container, weighed and the rinsings from 

the glassware were added to this container. The silica gel from the fourth impinger was 

transferred to its respective tared container and weighed. A blank of the sulfuric acid 

solution was taken. These containers were clearly marked and transported to our 

laboratory for analysis. 

Analysis 

The filters (Pallflex, quartz-fiber) were prepared for the field test by first heating for 

2 hours 220 degrees F then desiccating at 68 ± 10 ° Fat ambient pressure for 24 hours 

and weighing at intervals of at least six (6) hours to a constant weight to the nearest 0.1 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

42 
milligrams (less than 0.5 milligrams change from previous reading). Upon return to the 

laboratory, the filters were subjected to the same procedures as outlined above. The 

weights were recorded in a bound laboratory book and transferred to the sheets in this 

report (Method 5 Train Analytical Particulate Data). During each weighing the filter was 

not exposed to laboratory atmosphere for more than two (2) minutes and a relative 

humidity of less than fifty percent (50%). 

The acetone (reagent grade, 0.001% residue, in glass bottles) blank {Blank 

Analytical Data) for the group of tests and the acetone rinses for each test were 

evaporated to dryness in tared glass beakers. They were then desiccated for twenty-four 

(24) hours and weighed to a constant weight as described above. 

The sulfuric acid capture solutions were analyzed at our laboratory using ion 

chromatography (IC). 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

43 
STACK BREECHING AND SAMPLE POINT LOCATION 

0 

#38 KILN EXHAUST STACK 

"' j 

i 

I 

119" 

Figure 1 

44 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

1.9 

6.5 

13.0 

31.6 

37.5 

42.1 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
INTEGRA TED SAMPLING TRAIN 

METHOD3 

AIR..COOLEil 

CONOE.'IS£!1 

FILTER 

(GlASS 'HtJOll 

I 

I 

RAHMETEFI. 

QUJCX OISCO!I!IEC1' ---;j 

- ~ . c!G. VAlVE • . 

RIGIO CONTAINER 

Figure 2 

BAG 

GUAJ:IOIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

45 
f 

G' 

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN 

METHOD 26A 

'!'etlOA ot' Quar~: 

ru~ ... ---r-X---, 

lleaucl holM · 

epticaal SUiea 

o. Ul !laO! 

O.lll ~ 

Calillra~ad 

Orilic:e 

Cry Gas Vac .. ,.. 

w..ar· P'oap 

Figure 3 

46 GUARCIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 
HEATED 

PROSE 

SULFUR DIOXIDE (502) SAMPLING TRAIN 

METHOD6C 

STACX IIAU. 

H[ATED Fll TER 

CAUBRATIOH VALV£ 

MOISTURE 

·REMOVAl 

SYSTEH 

HEATED 

SA14PlE l!IIE SAMPLE BY -Pi\SS 

BY-PASS FLOW 

CONTROl VALVE 

SAMPLE TRAIISPORT LINE 

VENT 

SA.'1PLE 

GAS 

NAill FOLD 

SAI1PLE 

FlOW CONTROL VAlVE 

Figure 6C-l. ""•surement system schematic. 

EXCESS 

SAI1PLE VENT 

SAI1PLE 

BY-PASS VENT 

HEEDlE 

VALVE 

J: ~~.zoz 

(15 ml each) 

ROTAMfTER 

Figure 4 

GAS 

NIAlYlER 

ANAL HER 

FLQ\1 CONTROL VAlVE 

ORT GAS 

I'ITEJ! 

47 GUAROIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
•• 

NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) SAMPLING TRAIN 

METHOD 7E 

HEATED 

PROBE 

BY-PASS fl(l\1 

CONTROl YAlYE 

SAMPlE TiWISPORT liNE 

SAMPlE BY -PASS 

VENT 

CA.S HOISTIIR£ 

·RLHOYAl 

SYSTE!I 

SA.'1Pl£ 

CA.S 

Mit I FOlD 

SAI'l'lE 

FlOW CONTROl VA.lYE l AltA.l TZER 

.l.~AI. TZER 

flOW CONTROl YA.lYE 

Figure 5 

( 

GUAI=IOIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 

48 
NOMENCLATURE 

ACF- Actual Cubic Feet 

ACFM- Actual Cubic Feet per minute 

ACM -Actual Cubic Meters 

ACMS- Actual Cubic Meters per second 

An - Cross sectional area of nozzle, (ff) 

A. - Area of Stack, (ff) 

Bws - Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume (dimensionless) 

c.- Acetone blank residue concentration, mg/g 

c. - Particulate Concentration, ACF 

CFM - Cubic feet per minute 

C0 - Pitot tube coefficient, (dimensionless) 

c.- Particulate Concentration, grains/DSCF 

Cso2 - Concentration of sulfur dioxide (dry basis) corrected to 

standard conditions, lb/DSCF 

C12 - Particulate concentration (c. adjusted to 12% excess air), grains/DSCF 

C50 - Particulate concentration (c. adjusted to 50% excess air), grains/DSCF 

DSCF - Dry Standard Cubic Feet 

DSCFM - Dry Standard Cubic Feet per minute 

DSCM - Dry Standard Cubic Meters 

DSCMS - Dry Standard Cubic Meters per second 

EA - Excess Air, % 

I - lsokinetic Sampling, % 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

49 
NOMENCLATURE - continued 

Km - Orifice Correction Factor, (dimensionless) 

KP- Pitot tube constant, 85.49 llb/lb-mole)(in.HqlY:. 

(

0

R) (in. H20) 

L. - Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or for a 

leak check following a component change; equal to 0.02 CFM or 4 percent 

of the average sampling rate, whichever is less. 

L,- Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted prior to 

the "i1

h" component change (I = 1 ,2,3, ... n), CFM. 

LP- Leakage rate observed during the post test leak check, ft3

/min. (cfm). 

M. - Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg. 

Md- Molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole. 

Mn- Total amount of particulate matter collected, mg. 

M,- Molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole. 

Mw- Molecular weight of water, 18.0g/g-mole(18.011b/lb-mole) 

"P- Velocity head of stack gas, in. H20 

P.- Density of acetone, mg/ml 

Pbarm - Barometric pressure at the sampling site, in. Hg 

P9 - Stack static pressure, in. HP 

P m - Meter pressure, in. Hg 

PMR -Particulate Mass Rate, Lbs per hour 

P,- Absolute stack pressure, in. Hg 

P,1

d- Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg 

P w- Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml (0.002201 lb/ml) 

a.- Volumetric flow rate, ACFM 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

50 
NOMENCLATURE - continued 

0, - Volumetric flow rate, DSCFM 

R- Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 mm Hg- m3

fK-g-mole (21.85 in. Hg-ft"fR-Ib 

-mole) · 

SCF - Standard Cubic Foot 

t.- Ambient Temperature, °F 

tm - Average Temperature of meter, °F 

t,- Average Temperature of stack, °F 

t,,d- Standard Temperature, 68°F 

NOTE: Capital "T" denotes degrees Rankine 

v.- Volume of acetone blank, ml 

v.w - Volume of acetone used in wash, ml 

V,c- Total volume of liquid collected in condenser and silica 

gel, ml 

V m - Volume of gas sample, as measured by the dry gas meter, ACF 

Vmc- Volume of gas sample, corrected for leak, ACF 

Vmstd- Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter, 

corrected to standard conditions, DSCF 

Vn - Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF 

V,- Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec. 

Vwstd- Volume of water in the gas sample, corrected to 

standard conditions, SCF 

w.- Weight of residue in acetone wash, mg 

Y- Dry gas meter calibration factor, (dimensionless) 

.6.H - Average pressure differential across the calibrated orifice, in. H,O 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

51 
NOMENCLATURE - continued 

LI.H@- Value of H measured for a specific orifice when operated 

under the following conditions: 0.75 cfm of dry air 

(M.W. = 29) at 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg . 

.f LI.P - Average of the square roots of the velocity pressure, in. H20 

0- Total Sampling time, min. 

01 - Sampling time interval from the beginning of a run until the first 

component change, minutes. 

0i - Sampling time interval between two successive component changes, 

beginning with the interval between the first and second changes, 

minutes. 

0p- Sampling time interval from the final {n1

h) component change until the end 

of the sampling run, minutes. 

%C02 , %02 , %N2 , %CO- Number percent{%) by volume (dry basis) of each 

compound in the stack gas. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

52 
EQUATIONS 

1. 

p 

p "'p 

13 6 

2. 

b H 

p = p 

·-

13 . 6 

3. 

T p .. . v V Y(--){--) 

• T p .. 

4. 

v = 0 04707 v 

• 

5. 

v 

8 - v • v ... -

6. 

M =0 440 (%CO 2 )+0.320 {% )~0.280 (% N % co 

7. 

M I • 18 { B 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

53 
EQUATIONS - Continued 

8. 

v 

. 

o K 

' ' 

C ({:"";)avg 

-~ ~ ~ 

9. 

Q o (v )(A )(60 . . . 

10. 

528 p 

>I --)I _ ___:__ 

T 29 92 

11. 

c = [0 .0154 {M IV )J • n mud 

12. 

%0 -0.5%CO 

EA o I ' I 100 

0.264 % N

2 -(% 0 2 -0.5% CO) 

13. 

( 1 . 5 ) (% 0 2 ) - 0 . 133 (% N 2 ) - 0 . 75 (% CO ) 

c = c /1 - [ l " . 21 

14. 

12 

c 12 = { c • ) ( 

% co 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

54 
EQUATIONS - Continued 

15. 

60 

PMR • I c )( Q )( ___.;::...__ 

' ' 7000 

16. 

T v 

' m 

v • -{ ( 0 002669 I I v I · -1 Y I I P I I • m p T 

17. 

c • • I o . 0154 I I M .JI v 

18. 

100 v 

I• __ ____::__ 

60 v 6 A 

' 

19. 

V •V ·IL ·L 16 m ' • 

20. 

w ~ c v p . . -

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

55 
HAND EQUATIONS 

2. Pm =Pbarm + (n H/13.6) = (fr~l + (1.313)113.6 = 1CJ :."'1- / ~ 

3. Vm(std) = Vm Y (Tstd!T mHPm/Pstd) 

= (flP4

)(,.no')(528/', iv )( 'lp·b'~'/29.92) = 

4. vw(std) = 0.04707 vic: 0.04707C{]".,) = L\~ \\ / 

6. Md = 0.44 %C02 + 0.32 %02 + 0.28(%N2 + %CO) = " " / 

.44( j.v) + .32( '"b)+ .28( 'IJO~) = f'· <r c7 

8. v. = Kpcp (/np) !(T.J(M.P.)) 

= 85.49(~q,fo)(;c;i'J) /(1'-,J /(.;/)(?"' ~) = ·I _./ 

( L' !.) ~~ 

/ 

10. O. = 0.(1-Bws)(528fT.)(P.I29.92) 

= (;'. .t'')(1:\\' )(528/1"ov)(;J"~t,/29.92) = ~-

56 

,I c...· .... 

f) \ c • 

' I 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
HAND EQUATIONS - Continued 

I 

15. PMR = C5 0 5 (60/7000) = (oe'"u; )( ·· f)(60/7000) = 'J ·- ./ 

16. Vn = T.fPs X {(0.002669)V1

c + Vm Y PmlTm} 

= (1:".~)/l.'l {(0.002669)(1v;..·) + ()~ v'>)( 0~~(,o )/(~",')} 

""\ ... 0\~\ 

18. I= Vn(100)/{(60)8V5An} = 100(.:-;:\f{60(c,cJ)(1·"''}(.ifiJ1t = 

' :' _)1,-<)'j~ l! ·(~. ;' ': 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

57 
NOMENCLATURE FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE 

Coas = Effluent gas concentration, dry basis, ppm 

C = Average gas concentration indicated by gas analyzer, dry basis, 

ppm 

Co = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses for 

the zero gas, ppm 

em = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses for 

the upscale calibration gas, ppm 

Cma = Actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas, ppm 

MW = Molecular weight of S02, which is equal to 64.07 

S02 PPH = Sulfur dioxide mass rate in pounds per hour 

385.1 x 106 = Conversion factor 

EQUATIONS FOR S02 

C gas = (C-Co ) X (Cma) I (Cm -Co) 

= ( }-~ q J -{, !, "'; ) X ( 1../5 ¢- ) I ( (- • c.. - ' ,. - (. ~/ 

<;.f' 

so2 #IDSCF = cgas X MW I 385.1 X 106 

= ( ,3C) 4_"' ) X (64.07)1(385.1 X 106) = 

--;vc-~ l\:)o 

= S02 #IDSCF x DSGF"M x'6Q 

- I , = ( 4 .U-"Y, IV ) X ( f' v-'- ) X (60) = 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

58 
NOMENCLATURE FOR NITROGEN OXIDES 

C9as = Effluent gas concentration, dry basis, ppm 

C = Average gas concentration indicated by gas analyzer, dry basis , 

ppm 

C0 = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses 

for the zero gas, ppm. 

em = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses 

for the upscale calibration gas, ppm 

Cma = Actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas, ppm 

MW = Molecular weight of N02 , which is equal to 46.01 

NO. PPH = Nitrogen oxides (as N02) mass rate in pounds per hour 

385.1 X 106 = Conversion factor 

EQUATIONS FOR NOX 

Cgas = (C-C0 ) x (Cmal I (Cm - Co) 

= (t.f.(~ -/? ) x (~~"~~I ( (jP J -17 ) - ,/(/ ?·~· -~ {'Q 

NO. #/DSCF = C9as x MW I 385.1 x 106 ~ ,-~osf'P = ( ~ ! •. [ b ) X ( 46.01 )1(385.1 X 1 06 ) = 0 0'-''-' 

NO. PPH = NO. #IDSCF x DSCFM x 60 

= ( ) X ( ) X (60) = 

NO. #IMBTU = NO. #/DSCF x F-Factor x (20.91(20.9-%02)) 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

59 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC 

Method J~ A Field Data Sheet 

Source¥ 3B¥d,v txre!Jrt 

Run#_\,_____Time,StartOfrliL/ EndCAL/D Bpd;.~7 "HgKFactor Ia 5510 

Port & Time 

Point# Min. 

Meter 

Volume 

Ft' 

Stack Meter Temp GF Imp Box 

Temp t-----.----.-----i Temp Temp 

'F In Out Avg •F 'F 

Meter 

Pressure 

'H 0 

Velocity Vac., 

Pressure ~Hg 

'HO 

Static Pressure ~H 0 

--f), J4 

'A\ 5 C1J3.l- [,Jt,() (RJ.. ~ ( ~& 33 :J.Id.o I 00, it;>_J3 /-) Pretest Post test 

d. to ~n o bli-1 ~btl &3 bt.J 33 bt-5 t.3ci fJ-XO t-B .fJ.,Je;s e cJr->5 

Sample Box# T f) 

Meter Box # J 000 

Metert.H@ .59 

Meter Y Factor -e.~ 70-/ 

t-r emperature Device # ) D 

Probe# Lj - J 

Pilot c, .f). b:lb 

Probe Liner Material ~ /{DSJ 

Probe heat setting, J. 'Sl) 

~mbient Temperature (ai 

fynte? I Orsat? .-/ 

p,o, I% co, 

I Leak .Is 

Pilot 

Pretest Post Test 

R '-(.(p sJ. (.,. R S,( S t.{.d._ 

Pretest Leak ,/-&-.LOBCFM @ IS '• 

Post test Leak !{,I. ~.(;;A__ CFM @ 1.(-() 

Notes '7 )[J_ ) (h 

Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.r 
Run# d 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC 

Method M Field Data Sheet 

Source t\ 392 K:\.;, 1 Meust Date "7/;) f f Jco ( 

Time, Start lbl 0 End !liD Bp ~"1.'7?- "Hg K Factor _ _,&"-'.~5.,5<-..!r-""()'-----

Port & Time Meter Stack Meter Temp ~F Imp Box Meter Velocity Vac. Static Pressure UH20 

Point# Min. Volume Temp Temp Temp Pressure Pressure "Hg _ e . '"'IL/ 

Ft' 'F In Out Avg •f 'F "H 0 "H 0 o'-

.·.··········· .......... ~'::(). {p{J1 •· ••:·•. ••· · ... •I ,< .:.:·.·· .. ··•·. : I > , .····· · I ? > •·· > Nozzle Diameter, Inches 

1\1 5 9 5\.\,L, l~lol ?J:i ff) 9.7( 41 _('):t/J.. /. 0:2 .(Jjj- 25 Pretest Post test 

!) IO '15Z),(p -l1~ l'btp ~\ BLI 3E> B.LJ/ J. IY f:J.LJU 3-D .O.:/d5 E- ~'J6'C 

/!.. I 3'3 "\"'ft.,.S ~(/5 "''D C05 €5tJ 3l.{ fJl{/- I.J'/ ~ .Jb t.9.C f"L collected f3L, I 

Sample Box # q ~eter Box # ( CliJ 

~eter llH@ /. D ~ 

~eter Y Factor £) /1'k.J'J 

emperature Device# { 0 

Probe # L _ ;;} 

Pilot C, {;) . Q/)D 

Probe Liner Material ?;/m.£f 

Probe heat setting, 8<)() 

Ambient Temperature 

lfyrite? / Orsat? __... 

J Leak .Is 

fJrtfice 

Pretest Post Test 

R5./ S4.J. R(./ Sj_"l_ 

Pretest Leak ./(.;.coL/ CFM@ ( J ~ 

Posttest Leak ./ ,Y.!()( CFM@ t,r() •r 

Notes CfiS: t..(f ~ 

Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.r U!/ 

61 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC 

Method Jlo 4- Field Data Sheet 

Source~ 35 }(;\).) [ tkuSt Date'11 J II Jco 1 

Run# 3 Time, Start \ ilj$' End J.)_L{j- BpJ3."l7- "HgKFactor ~.55l0 

Port & Time Meter Stack Meter Temp oF Imp Box Meter Velocity Vac. Static Pressure "H20 

Point# Min. Volume Temp Temp Temp Pressure Pressure "Hg 

Ft' "F In Out Avg "F "F "HO "H 0 - {). JL/ · .. · .... Cfl5.553 I ··. < •.··· 

>········.····· 

... •··.· - .• .• _.· < << 

I·•······ 

Nozzle Diameter, Inches ,· 

AI 5 0"'1'7 D :3-.10 '?71£? fXp 6?- 3;). ldst /.51 ~~( l2.~ Pretest Post test 

~ \1) J"'\ 8.--=tJ 9)1- 55 I Plio 3J {)fl1 Il-l IQJ5 .30 .(:1. J&") ~.~f.15 

3 tS I. (p 8-:}'J-- !Q:t I 'n'1 5& 31 ~~ /.1() -G§ 3.() tJ. Jf,5 -0C/DS 

L/ ;i.O 10.3 cHb B<o B5 I f) ;r.. J-1 l'il 1-~5 -§.-Jt.f 3.0 .6J ;JDS 0-Jn5 

5' .9S \3."0 d11- ~ 55 Af- .SY 6~ 1.4/o ejD 1.2 .f) Moisture 

v 3D \0 ilo.IA4 .AD 159 6") ~::r- y; Q53 -e-B~ -&' ff<, /. 't pet#~~ Cond# :;.-

10 ( 35 . ~\J. I ()?{) 81-:' 55 2{p 3:7 J<.((o i.d7- ~-J!.? lJ.s lnl collected 

:J YD JJ. '-{ J74 6b t>J5 '07- 35 Olfi /Sf 'ra .31 2-'0 Grams collected 

'<, 45' ~-=l-. I c9-=A S<f:, 3\J SG? 3') IJ~ /.It/) 'e.Jif J.o otal moisture 

"1 "SD '30.'1 1N'J C)O SLI fFl- 3') I~ 1. r() ~.]5 Jc Test Team Personnel 

5 55 Jt.j' G, 9".7") 6'1 <;w B~ .J5 ~~~ 1. &o ~ .'3.J 3-C) Mfter Box .-, Probe 

(p I..O IOJ1.JID cn~.t 2>7 Bli !~} 35 IJ.t. -6). 86 e./$ :I.D !'1X,r h, rBtkl ~ample Bo~# to 

ifv1eter Box# lffJJ 

Meter liH@ 1. 'ill ~eter Y Factor -G.1A-ol1 

emperature Device # \() 

Probe# L\-a 

Pitot Cp -e. n~o 

Probe Liner Material (, lcSJ 

Probe heat setting, )'Sl) 

Ambient Temperature "1-'1 

Fyrite? Orsat? ,_/ 

~02 I% C02 

I leak ./"s 

§rifice 

Pitot 

Pretest Post Test 

R~l S5.7- R ')._3 s~s 

Pretest Leak ./ GJ-()!}3 CFM@ /() •, 

Post test Leak 1,1 ~ / CFM @ 4.{) 

Notes 3 + 'Ji-1 f., 

)'?-: 3 vc:: 

Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. ~,-- GCU( 

LJI 7-57- '15 7'1- I L/f.ol BS45 

(S; @ 62 

I 

I 

I 
Particulate Sample Recovery and Integrity 

Client: ~co.\ Stp,\..Q_ Sample Date: g I () 1l Sbo 1 

Source:# 3'6 ,\{. l N (,rho.LL"'f Recovery Date: "'\ ;!J I ;)oo 1 

Sampling Personnel: L.J(;~, D. 'fx,;/,,t Balance ID: ~\\;....,_( 1 

Recovery I : ' """ Personnel: L . ;1~ BP: _ _:o:A~.'1..!.r.!._ ____ _ 

Balance Type: Triple Beam Electronic---"'----

Moisture Data 

Run No. \ Run No. J Run No. __ 3,L.__ 

Final volume in impingers (ml) e,c,, 5 f'.i.>. I 11.3 

Initial volume in impingers (ml) fr & 

Net volume increase (ml) 'b'l'. 5 ?1., I 

Silica gel container number \~ IL\ 

Final silica gel weight (g) CJL(z, J. 9t..S . .4 

Initial silica gel weight (g) 031..,,5 CZ'ft. J 

Net weight increase (g) n+ IS. Q Cf, I 

Color of silica gel ~~ :ia..J. ""-''l.d 

Total moisture /Q ~. J_ k1Lf.3 7-1 y 

Sample Recovery 

Run No. Run No. {)__ Run No. __3 

Filter Number 303 6:1 JQ3fcJ0 JD3J5l/, 

Filter container number ~~\ 'V._v..d 

Color of material on filter L,.)l,k IvA'~-->-

Filter container sealed? ./ 

Probe and filter wash container no. '\(_""" I ~~~ 

Liquid level marked? ./ / 

Acetone ~water_ blank no. 'Gh ... .....-k.-

Samples stored and locked? ~ 

---- Sample Chain of Custody 

Were all individual sample seals intact? Yes ......-111o _Initials 1£.{_ 

If no. indicate sample n 

1 

Relinquished by7"~L~t;z.:_ ______ _ 

-7-7"""::--------zf'-7~-- Date _____ Time ____ _ 

Analyzed by --=~:;;f_?~~'::'~~':A5Z'::-Date /!Gtkt Time !/.(V 

Duplicate analysis by Date '7/i!/cr Time OEXD 

Comments 

63 

GUAROIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
. .~. 

3136 
Ltt----- I 

J1!-P--L_ ~,J-: ntlr.t! rcw1 ~ ---~i~/~id3~o7£1~5u~~---=30~0~.~l/ ____ ~00ft -----~2~1J~0~3~tv~-~~----~~~q]j£ ____ u6JL.~~~~~~~4- ____ ~J~I1~C~')~I~~/.3~ __ ~3=u~j·~b~--~~b£,~~~~~c~~4-

~- JJ ~-----~ JT~ Ll-<---- 1 -~-~-- 1.:--1---~ <--__ to_o ___ ------,-'~~~--.!!..£.1.':~4--
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

·Blank Analytical Data 

Plant: General Shale Products Corp. 

Sample location: Outlet 

Relative humidity: 46% 

Type of blank: Acetone 

Liquid level at mark and container sealed: 

Density of blank: 

Blank Volume 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time of wt.: 

Concentration of Blank 

0.7847 g/ml 

200 ml 

9-26-01 1100 Gross wt 

9-27-01 0800 Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Weight of blank 

o.oob-o. mg/g ----

Yes 

82087.3 

82087.3 

82087.3 

82087.3 

0.00 

0.0000%. 

Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (0.01mg/g) or 0.001% of the weight 

of the blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. 

Remarks: 

Signature of analyst: --· ··--

Signature of reviewer: 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

of weight 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

66 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data 

Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Run Number: 

Sample location: 

Relative humidity: 

Density of Acetone: 

Outlet 

46% 

0.7847 g/ml 

Liquid level at mark and container sealed: 

Filter marked and container sealed: 

Acetone rinse container number: 

Acetone rinse volume: 100 ml 

1 

Acetone blank residue concentration: 

Acetone blank weight 

0.0000 

0.0 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time of wt.: 

ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 

9-26-01 1100 

9-27-01 0800 

Gross wt. 

Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Less weight of acetone blank 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

PARTICULATE WEIGHT 

Filter(s) container number: 1 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time of wt.: 

9-26-01 

9-27-01 

11 00 Gross wt. 

0800 Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Weight of particulate on filter (s) 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE 

Yes 

Yes 

mg/g 

mg 

1 

81497.1 mg 

81497.4 mg 

81497.3 mg 

81489.2 mg 

0.0 mg 

8.1 mg 

302.4 mg 

302.5 mg 

302.5 mg 

303.4 mg 

-0.9 mg 

. __ __!lJ_ mg 

7J_mg 

Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (0.01 mg/g) or 0.001% of the weight 

of the blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. 

Remarks: 

Signature of analyst: 

Signature of reviewer: 

67 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
-------------------------------------------

GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data 

Plant: General Shale Products Corp. 

Sample location: 

Relative humidity: 

Density of Acetone: 

Outlet 

46% 

0.7847 

Liquid level at mark and container sealed: 

Filter marked and container sealed: 

Acetone rinse container number: 

Acetone rinse volume: 120 

Run Number: 

g/ml 

ml 

2 

Acetone blank residue concentration: 

Acetone blank weight 

0.0000 

0.0 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time of wt.: 

ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 

9-26-01 1100 

9-27-01 0800 

Gross wt. 

Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Less weight of acetone blank 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

PARTICULATE WEIGHT 

Filter(s) container number: 2 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time of wt.: 

9-26-01 

9-27-01 

11 00 Gross wt. 

0800 Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Weight of particulate on filter (s) 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE 

Yes 

Yes 

mg/g 

mg 

~--

2 

83848.9 

83849.0 

83849.0 

83836.1 

0.0 

12.9 

294.0 

294.1 

294.1 

293.6 

0.4 

12.9 

13.3 

Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (0.01mg/g) or 0.001% of the weight 

of the blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. 

Remarks: 

Signature of analyst: 

Signature of reviewer: 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

mg 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

68 
GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED 

P.O. BOX 190 

LEEDS, AL 35094 

800-738-5719 

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data 

Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Run Number: 

Sample location: Outlet 

Relative humidity: 46% 

Density of Acetone: 0.7847 g/ml 

Liquid level at mark and container sealed: 

Filter marked and container sealed: 

Acetone rinse container number: 

Acetone rinse volume: 100 ml 

3 

Yes 

Yes 

3 

Acetone blank residue concentration: 0.0000 mg/g 

Acetone blank weight 

Date & time ofwt.: 

Date & time ofwt.: 

ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 

9-26-01 1100 Gross wt. 

9-27-01 0800 Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Less weight of acetone blank 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

PARTICULATE WEIGHT 

Filter(s) container number: 3 

Date & time of wt.: 

Date & time ofwt.: 

9-26-01 

9-27-01 

11 00 Gross wt. 

0800 Gross wt. 

Average Gross wt. 

Tare wt. 

Weight of particulate on filter (s) 

Weight of particulate in acetone rinse 

TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE 

0.0 mg 

71301.3 mg 

71301.1 mg 

71301.2 mg 

71294.5 mg 

0.0 mg 

6.7 mg 

302.1 mg 

302.0 mg 

302.1 mg 

302.8 mg 

-0.8 mg 

---- -~z.mg ___ 6.0_ mg 

Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (0.01 mg/g) or 0.001% of the weight 

of the blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. 

Remarks: 

Signature of analyst: 

Signature of reviewer: 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

69 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

P.O. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Report Date: 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Page: 1 

9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Control No: 0109-00412 Sample# 001 

Sampler LK 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

Sample ID : Run 1 Acid 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 1 0:00 NIOSH 

- METHOO REFERENCES-

{i) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600.14-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination ot Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition. 1992 

(3) Test Methods tor Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code ot Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, Appen~. ReVJsed July 1995 

(6) Methods tor the Determination ot Organic Compounds in Drink1ng Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

P.O. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Report Date: 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Page: 1 

9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Control No : 0109-0041 2 Sample # 002 

Sampler : LK 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

Sample ID : Run 1 Base 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by: )7 .. 1'· .e~ ~ 

-METHOD REFERENCES-

(1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993. May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition. 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chem1cal Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

{4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, AppendiJ f-. Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4·88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

P.O. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

321 1 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No : 0109-00412 Sample # 003 

Sampler : LK 

Sample ID : Run 2 Acid 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 1 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) 57.0 Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by:_...,../7==;;z_../j,'--"-='~=~:'?'6="'-' _____ _ J 

-METHOD REFERENCES-

(1) Methods for Chemical Analysis at Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846. 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part i 36, Appencf1r'~. Revised July i 995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4·88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

P.O. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

Report Date: 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 1 

9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Control No : 01 09-0041 2 Sample # 004 

Sampler LK 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

Sample ID : Run 2 Base 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by: ~ 6£-.-...;4 y 

-METHOD REFERENCES-

{1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA~S00/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1 993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th_ Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Part 136, Appenq13A. Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Orgariic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

PO. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No : 01 09-00412 Sample # 005 

Sampler LK 

Sample ID : Run 3 Acid 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by: 

?! ~ ~ 

-METHOD REFERENCES -

(1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, AppendMA, Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991. August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

PO. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson CitY, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No : 01 09-0041 2 Sample # 006 

Sampler LK 

Sample ID : Run 3 Base 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 1 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21 /01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by: j 7 ~ 

-METHOD REFERENCES-

(1) Methods tor Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods tor the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, Appencf11j'. Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

PO. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No : 01 09-0041 2 Sample # 007 

Sampler : LK 

Sample ID : Blank Acid 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 1 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by:~ ~~ 

- METHOD REFERENCES -

{1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-20. revised March 1983. August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Part 136. Appe~A. Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039. Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

PO. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No : 0109-00412 Sample # 008 

Sampler : LK 

Sample ID : Blank Base 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by: 1

? 7 ~ 

~METHOD REFERENCES~ 

(1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993. May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition. 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Sdid wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update tV December 1996 

(4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136. Appen~:syrA. Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC. 

305 Ashville Road 

PO. Box 190 

Leeds, Alabama 35094 

General Shale Products Co. 

P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 

3211 Roan St. 

Johnson City, TN 37601 

Attention: Mr. Phil Towles 

Control No: 0109-00412 Sample # 009 

Sampler LK 

Sample ID : Blank Dl Water 

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE 

Telephone 

Wats 

Fax 

205/699-664 7 

800/738-5719 

205/699-3882 

Page: 1 

Report Date: 9/28/01 

9/24/01 

14:26 

Receive Date: 

Receive Time: 

Sample Date: 9/21/01 

Sample Time: 0:00 

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD 

Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH 

Approved by:)/ ~~~::;::,=. ______ _ 

./ 

-METHOD REFERENCES-

(1) Methods for Chemical Analysis atWater and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 

(2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 

(3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Methcx:l SW-846. 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 

{4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards 

(5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, Appenqt8A, Revised July 1995 

(6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995 
• VISUAL EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT 

·FACILITY NAME. bEHa-~ SB+>? 

LOCATION l-cui sv ll<- Kv ~EMISSION SOURCE.#: 3& 1<'.· ~~ e.[hou5f I coNTROL DEVICE l : ..,.._ Stn,,J,J;,.., ft.rh.us ..... DRAW NORTH ARROW 

} ~ 

STACK HEIGHT 10' 

SYMBOLS 

SUN WINO 

. ' 

DISTANCE FROM SOURCE. )-?Q 0 ~ 

-co-

' DIRECTION FROM SOURCE.C.} C PlUYE & STAC)( a.....--

---

SECONDS 

:MIN 0 15 I 30 45 

0 

2 

0 0. Cl>'O 

0 0 0 0 

' 3 

4 

0:8) 62 0 

0 0 C) 0 

5 0 

6 'D 6 0 

7 '5 0 0 

8 0 b 0 C>~ 

9 C> 0 0 0 

10 0 0 1

0 

11 0 0 0 0 

12 'C) 0 0 0 

13 0 0 0 0 

14 0 0 v 0 

COMMENTS 

CONDENSED WATER IN 1HE PLut/E.?-Al..JJ__ 

SECONDS SECONDS 

MIN 45 ' 0 i 15 30 45 I MIN 0 15 ; 30 

; ' 0 ' ., . . 30 OO•o'O 45 v'o!£2 

'" : o , 0 : o o 31 0 D ' b o 46 0 : 5 , o , 0 

17 f>C>ao 32ooos47oooo 

18 0 ; 0 . 0 0 33 () 0 ' 0 I 0 46 I 0 0 , 5 ; 0 

-"'9,_,_· =0:_:_· ,_O'__;._cCJ..-____,.Oc.,' 34 0 c') <t) a_ 49 i ~ 0 o C) 

~20--''--'1!>"'--.__,o~_.oJ.._c_j 35 o c o o so o 0 o 5 ~''~l.IO:_:_• =0+"'0--'-'0"'-JI , 36 CJ 0 • 0 : 0 51 : 0 · Q o o : 

o o o o~ 37 D · o ·a :a 52' o ,0 o o 22 

~23__,0"-c--.,.,_0 ~~ 38 0 ' 0 0 0 53 0 ' 0 2___0_ 

24 o · b o -~ '-'-' _Q..le 'a o_ 54 : o o · o o . ' '· ~! 25 0 -~- 0 ~__Q__J) . 0 lY_ ~ 0 0 Q_~ 

o o o o 41 G 0 0 o 56 ' o o o a 

! ~27_:_6-.-_,_,.0'"'-,.. ,.o._ ~ 42 o o o G 57 ; 4> 0 a o 

28 0 0 0 0 ~43 Q Q . e I (!) I 56 · Q 5 Q 0 

26 

29 · o o · o o ·--~ _~_o_Q_JQ __ ~~~ .. Q_!? __ ,<>_ 

---.. _______ ,_... --

---·------- -

'REDUCTION- HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE (SMAJ _M 

ALLOWABLE ---'% OPACITY 

NO SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE= 

CERTlFICATlCN EXP!RATlON DATES LECTURE _ _!f__,3_,Q!j 

S'GNA~ r1 :Hz . 

TOTAl MINUTES OBSERVED _kj_]__ 

ALLOWABLE ---'% OPACil'r' 

NO SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE~ 

FIElD}QJ!i..;QJ CERTIFIED BY (±p£!!11 3'133 

OA7'E ---

9 ,t,J 1 "' 

79 

• 

• 
• 

• 

VISUAL EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT 

:FACILITY NAME;{-)tN~/1\.. Stlftl-" 

LOCATION; Ln iSI·•'ll~ Kv 

EMISSION SOURCE; Jf Jt-' kl~ f ,deusf 

:CONTROL DEVICE; L ;,.< SoJJ,,r f.u.k 

:STACK HEIGHT: 

DRAW NORTH ARROW 

!DISTANCE FROM SOURCE / OBSERVER POSITION 

:DIRECTION FROM SOURCE:t: S e I CONDITIONS· 

:wiND DIRECTION FROM: 

:WIND SPEED: 

. AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 

isKY COVER: 

i PLUME BACKGROUND: 

, PLUME COLOR 

~CLOCK TIME: 

C0N0ENSED WATER IN THE PlUUE? ~ 

ATTAC>EI> 

I ~ 

------~S~E~CO~N~D~S~--~ ~----~SE~~CO~~~~---c SECONDS SECONDS 

MIN 0 15 30 45 I MIN Q ; 15 I 30 45 0 15 I 3Q 45 ! PJIN 0 15 30 45 

o • G • o C> c; 1 15 o 1 o 1 o · c ,o £!1 o o e 

• t) 0 . C) () : 16 ' 0 : a I 0 0 c-''.''--"'O:___:_;;;J5L-LOL_~o~ 

2 0 

' ' 0 

6 iJ . o I 11 . o : o I 0 o c-'-"'2---"'0'---_..o<---or..L 0 

(2 0 0 ' 16 ; 8 i ri . l'i -o " 0 0 l " . 0 

4 : o o o o 19 o • o o o ,. a o 1

o e 

f---"-5 ---;·_J_OJ.___-'0~-'6 u 20 ' () 0 8 0 35 t) 0 (l_LL 1 

6 I 0 -II 0 0_; 21 0 • 0 0 o 36 u "' 0 ~.o 0 

70000 2201000 370QOQ 

___-_B____c0"---'-f2z.__,..O~- 23 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 

9~{;'='---'-"' 0,-___ 0 __Q_, 24 (j 0 ' 0 6 39 5 0 • 0 f> 

10 (} 0 6 ~-- ~fJ._JL 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 

_1_1 -.-O.___Q__{J___Q~ I 26 Q · () 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 _ 

12 · o o o a r- 27 • 0 · o o o 42 5 o o · o · ~_Q__Q_fLQ. ! 28 . 0 '0 . 0 __ Q__ ., 0 D. 0 0 

~._~ 0- f?_ ?_._ _o_~~~ ~~-.D - -~ -9 o --~ o 

COMMENTS 

45 0 tJoo 

46 0 

47 () 0 0, 0 

46 0 

49 I[) 

50 5 D 

51 o.o 

52 0 0 

53 0 0 

54 0 0 

55 0 0 

56 0 0 

57;(!) 0 

() 0 

oo 

a o 

oo 

5' 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

56 o a o a 

590060 

REDUCTION HIGHEST SIX MINlJTE AVERAGE (SMA) ~ TOTAl t.INUTE$ OBSERVED f..t.:;::(l 

AllOWABLE ____ % OPACJTV 

NO SW:S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE= 

AI..~OWABL£ ---- % OPACITY 

~ sw.·s S<CEEOING AllDWAaE= 

CERTl""ICATlON EXPIRATION DATES LECTURE _ _!j_,J._p t./ ""IELD /D t.!::!__,_QJ_ CERTIFIED 8Y AtEI'tt ..3 v 3? 

SiGNATURE 

~A. 'ry ,IJq, r~ DA~ 2_,~1r~ 

80 

• 
VISUN.. EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT 

,FACILITY NAME GfNet:.AL ,S /4At.G : 

! LOCATION: L CUI sv. f{_. ry I 

I EMISSION souRCE #-)8 f((v fd1cult ! 

, CONTROL 08/ICEL;,.,.._ Xi'l.1fk<v &;t~! / ' 

:STACK HEIGHT: 70 I I 

r------- I' ! 

!<:>ISTANCE FROM SOURCE: c?-'? D 

~·DIRECTION FROM SOURCLs f 

:CONDITIONS: -··---··-~RT STOP! 

WINO DIRECTION FROM: , 5 VV C,vJ 1 

I WINO SPEED: I 0 - IS' I 0 - ,c;, 

IAMBIENT TEMPERATURE: '79. 0 ;..,q"' 1 

isKY coveR: ClD'I 'ln .. l i PLUME BACKGROUND: ,/f.~(!S rf£E5 I 

i PLUME COLOR 7fJiTrf? ~iiJ7fi 

SYIBJLS 

"'"' 0 

PlUME & STACK a..--

-

DRAW NORTH ARROW 

/ OBSERVER POSITION 

~4~ v 

CONDENSED 'NA.TER IN lHE PLUME.?~ 

ATTACHED 1 I R. < DETACHED 

_ -~__.s,..E,-.c":o'!'No,s,_ __ _ , c_l -,---SE=C:":O'!'NOS,.,__---jl' 1- I SECONDS I I SECONDS 

I I I ' ' I 

_M_I~ 0 15 __ 30 45 ~-_____Q____j_~~-~ ! MIN 0 15 30 45 

0 • ' I I' ' 

I MIN I 0 15 30 45 i 

~ 45'6'05o! o 0 0 0 1s : <1 , o : o : () 1 ' ,. 6 0 : 0 

' 1 I 0 C) 0 I 0 ~ ' 16 ! () ' ~ i Q i 0 ~ i 31 I 0 0 i 0 0 ' ' (;) '0 i 

0 0 '6 I · 2: () 0 'D _QJ 111lo_.jo__;.o •o ~ f-E-'5 ~ 'o a_ ~o o 0 D !~o : 0 i o. ~ · 33 · ~ o o o 48 , o_ o ~ ~ 1 o , '0 0 0 I ' ' ' i I i 4 1 ~ o '_:--'-"--!- c> ,__ a _j__Q~ ~ o o J:2.... 49 o 0 a> , ,2 

0 A 0 ' I I -- 1 ' A 50 ,/!\. A ..._ ,'Q i 

,_s -~- · v , _ _Q_ 1_2Q __ ~_LL <' ' _Q__J.;_ 35 : o v .a___Q~ "" v ,., 

8 : o o "0 iJ : 21 'o ~ o i o : 36 ',? o o o_ s1 o o I (:J • o 

_.' o o -~ o , 6 ~o · 6 I e> _Q_ 37 s o • (f) o , 52 e o ? o ! 

8 0 0 0 : 0 ~' 0 : 6 I 0 +o-: :_ 38 0 0 f) 0 I 53 {I ' 0 0 0 ' 

• c> C) or'-~-,' 24 o Oi c2 o 39 0 o ~ o· W" 0 0 o•O 

~' lS) D ! 0 (j ! 25 0 0: 0 0 ~ I 40 '6 0 (;_ D ~ ! 55 0 C> 0: 0 

!--" o " ~_o___aj 26 o o • c o 41 C9 o I o o : s• o o i a 1 a 

12 o b I 0 0 J 21 i o o ; o o i ~D D o o i s1 o 0! 0 :a 

:.-.'~ 0 0 1

6£j 1

28'0 ojO 43 f9 o'Q 0 Iss Q 0 O;Q i 

.. '~ ~ : _{2~--~Ci___Q:&_ _ _o_~' ~ · C:> _c:l~,.o'----~s•"--'-'0-' __ c.Q 1

:;:, • 0 

COMMENTS ------------

·---- '-------------------' ·-- -------------

-------

REDUCTION HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE (SMA) w. TOTAL MINLJTES OBSERVED (cC 

ALLOWABLE ---"' OPACITY AllOWABLE "' OPACITY 

NO SMA.'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE"' __ NO SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE"' ---

CERTlFICATlON EXPIRATION DATES LECTIJRE..:/.._/_1_1 0 lf FIEt.D-/.12._;..!:[_,Q!__ CERTIFIED avA-JJC /)'\ 3'1-33 

S!GNA~Ar:p._,;t(c:u.' . ...,. _..e:,__ __ DATE ~~!_L_E!_ 

··----- ---- -------··------ -- ... -----~-·----------- ---

81 

I~ 
METHOD 6C FIELD DATA 

Instrument setup Data 

Facility: Sn Je:f&v s;:ff-kVE 

Samplinglocation: /135' l(;;i_ &ocv/ 

Date(s) of tests : 9-::'9/-o / Data Logger Channel )I 

Analyzer Manufacturer: ----'-lf{p--"'...ecl.r _,f>:..:c-Pr-=-------------------

AnalyzerModei#/Serial#: V ( fS- t;l V ( t:;r/i 779d{z.._. I 

Recorder Manufacturer: fL tJ iCE fly&,f i/117tr Co9c.22'2-

RecorderModei#/Serial#: ,2020Lfr /taZv Y? 0!): ,-,,-.., 

Anticipated S02 Concentration (ppm): U - ? '- u 

Calibration Gases 

Level 0% 40-60% 80-100% 

Vendor /).,cL /,oc, hoc 

Conc(ppm) ' 0 :JL/q. { tlc;-2, 0 

Carrier I 

gas fV-:J- ~ 

7 

Container S:> ;4=-( ~ Type / 

Cylinder 

ID# Cc.r8sro C C ?-0 t.(lfo 

Date of 

Expiration - t(5/o3 R/15/o·~ 

Cylinder 

Pres. Z7()CU 170 (8 o1J (psi) /1 

Signature: j!(tc~:P 

/ 

82 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 6C 

Analyzer Calibration Data 

Facility: ~etJe]J!-1... Runs: --f-f-:=3,.2------

Location: .j/3g' /c/UJ fuAusT Operator: {/0 7k Jt<- Span: o-s-oo 

i 

Date: ~ja-1 /o; Flow Setting: D-~ Manifold Pres: 4 

Range of Gas Zero Mid High 

Cylinder Value ppm c) () l(_ '(. '{ '{?/ 

Analyzer calibration :/'5 -;f '-!51} response, ppm 77 

Absolute Difference 7./ s.'f {. )-

%of Span {.;)-{ Dio'f 6 d-'-/ 

All values must be less than 2% of span. 

83 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 6C 

System Calibration Bias 

and Drift Data 

Customer: bw'f'AL- SIIIJL--c Run#: _ ___,/~--

Location: #38 j{j(;J fx-JtAvsr Operator. 7r lor?-, Uc Span: 

Date: 7,/o-t /o 1 Time: Og4t ~o'ftl' ''I Flow Setting:_____,()"-,: "",.t.)L-"-""-=----

Manifold Pressure: f.?. f 

Response Time (sec) 1. __ /f-?-~~(,----- 2. (3 "").., 

Ranqe Zero Upscale 

Analyzer Calibration 77 t.fjlcf Response, ppm 

Initial 

System Calibration 

Response, ppm 7-~ '-( L{ 0 3 

Initial 

System Cal. Bias, % !)_ )_ ).lt 

Final 

System Calibration 1-7 l(L/e, 5 ReSQonse, ppm 

Final 

System Cal. Bias, % D.t_{ A.t'-( 

Drift,% o'-tY b- () lf 

System Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response - Analyzer Calibration 

Response)/Span x 100 

Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response- Initial System Calibration Response)/Span 

X 100 

Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is~ 5%. 

Maximum allowable Drift is 

Signature: 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

84 
Method 6C 

System Calibration Bias 

and Drift Data 

Customer: bt;t-Jl<£A< Run#: ____ _ 

Location: .zl 3 8 /Ci CN WfAvSt6perator:--'-z"-'. (,.,..r272""-L=--J._,VZ=-~-Span: "' - 5c_,--v 

j/ c( _ /} 

Date : z/:2!,/c?l Time: toft -ill'{ Flow Setting: _--~._,.·,~-...<i_-AJ..L>-<"'----

Manifold Pressure: ___ (;,_.+/_' __ 

I 

Range Zero Upscale 

Analyzer Calibration 

Response, ppm 7. ) lf.5t. )_ 

Initial 

System Calibration 

Response, ppm 1. 7 4. L(u '5 

Initial 

System CaL Bias, % ()' ~/ ) I Lj 

Final 

System Calibration 

Response, ~·6 l{Lfl( 7 ppm 

Final 

System CaL Bias, % oy_r- 13 

Drift,% (), -ao D)~ 

System CaL Bias, % = (System Calibration Response - Analyzer Calibration 

Response)/Span x 100 

Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial System Calibration Response)/Span 

X 100 

Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is± 5%. 

Maximum allowable Dri~ _:%-

Signature: :;{!A :!--z_'7 

85 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 6C 

System Calibration Bias 

and Drift Data 

Customer: Gtrv&721Jc.- GlfAu;= 

Location: ;i-.30 /?rc& G:-&ztus70perator: T!or"2Je 

I I . J ?'{ r;-1 Date· q 2f 6( Time· J/1? -t('fb FlowSetting· ) I 

Manifold Pressure: bt 

( 

Range Zero Upscale 

Analyzer Calibration 

Response, ppm 7/ 4St )-

Initial 

(. 0 System Calibration 

Response, ppm cr\.{V 7 

I 

Initial 

System Cal. Bias, % [) '-{ )- ;.5 

Final 

System Calibration 

Response, ppm {0~ 4!..(1~ 

Final 

System Cal. Bias, % D 0 )- ( 9. )---

Drift,% ('>t.../:.2 t!).{o r 

Span: 6 - 20<) 

6-r/1. . 

System Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response - Analyzer Calibration 

Response)/Span x 100 

Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial System Calibration Response)/Span 

X 100 

Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is.± 5%. 

Maximum allowable Drift is+ 

Signature: -----7'-+-'-~-"'~'-/<-(;-=C.'----t...--7.:::..C"""T"" ________ _ 

~-

86 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
METHOD 7E FIELD DATA 

Facility:_--=-k__::_tu----'-j_cf._:_:h:..::_·~____./e-"-/-----------

Date(s) of tests: -----'--1_--=CY_--o.:::.--L..( _____ Data LoggerChanne1~_5,:__ __ _ 

0 

Analyzer Manufacturer: _./-"/?t-4:____:·=-:!· '<:.=:1-::.::'"'-""----------------

Analyzer Model #/Serial#: --"1-"'5"-yL'-/'f'-1f-/_o.:__c_!""O-"-c1-=.J_.Y'-'V __________ _ 

Recorder Manufacturer: M f,_ lfr .t.._ {JJi.._ /&:,(<-. 

Recorder Model #/Serial#: c2 t :?S,~/;; ?o L/ (p '-' ~ 

Anticipated NOx Concentration (ppm): 6 - ) "'J 

Calibration Gases 

Level 0% 40-60% 80-100% 

Vendor /30<:- Bvc_ Be:· c__ 

Conc(ppm) 0 ,-) '-(.'!;. <, :It,( 5 

Carrier ( ·~ gas rl .r 

r 

Container 

Type <)) ;4-0 7 

Cylinder 

10# XC:J)ff,JIDIJ ~C.J1>ic 5 

Date of 

Expiration 

-----

/l -/7 -D)- u-7(-J9 

Cylinder ?oqo I Pres. r;cc I ;5 L) 0 (psi) 

Signature: 

(/ 

?$J~ / 

87 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 7E 

Analyzer Calibration Data 

Facility: --'~"-',"'•P-'("'"'~:::....::If""~-"""'-~------- Runs: /~ 3 

Location: If<>? J,lc.._f/A,.j" Operator: __,_/_-_to_n.c_· _li __ Span: 6 - §?N 

Date: ----"Z----"'9'---+-(_--=o~{ __ Flow Setting: ----"'@""--""e~::pp'-1..-- Manifold Pres: #-

Range of Gas Zero Mid High 

Cylinder Value ppm D :7-'Lrl' 'I (/r. 5 

Analyzer calibration 

response, ppm /. 7 )"7J..f 471.~ 

Absolute Difference 1-7 Li. I l. ~ 

%of Span 0 "3-( t:J-<&r 03<p 

All values must be less than 2% of span. 

88 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 7E 

System Calibration Bias 

and Drift Data 

Customer: __ 0,_se'-'· =..fwwu)"'-"""'--. -~----'1d--=-·_,_-L_· _________ Run#:_---'/ __ 

Location: /2. ?, t: /,, {3,J..~..r Operator: f: Cdcf/[ Span: t -Sc- o 

G . 31 . ~'{ . Date: I ifi-0( T1me: Or 't' -C9<16 FlowSettlng:---'./t"-·-=-'-'=C"-t-4-b"------

Manifold Pressure: { { 

Response Time (sec) 1·----rt"":r--"7'---- 2. ___ g""--'3=-----

Range Zero Upscale 

Analyzer Calibration 7 t(?f) 

I . ~·-_L 

Response, ppm ,7'//.'-f 

Initial 

System Calibration d,L/ '-17 (. ~ Response, ppm 

Initial 

System CaL Bias, % o.L-{ [ro~ 

Final 

System Calibration 

Response, ppm \D 4~'J.S 

Final 

System CaL Bias. % D i~ I. 7 

Drift,% or& I. rt 

System CaL Bias. % = (System Calibration Response - Analyzer Calibration 

Response)/Span x 100 

Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial System Calibration Response)/Span 

X 100 

Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is :t 5%. 

M"im"m •llow•ble Dcift ~ Signature: ~L_ 

89 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Method 7E 

System Calibration Bias 

and Drift Data 

Customer: __ b_~--"·"'-'~=--'-~-'--"'-"-/_,z_-=----------Run #: __ __)__ _ 

Location: #!;<{ /!~;-..&/;a:/ Operator: rf-t.~l~ 7)(_ S c) .....,.-,. ' 

pan: __ ~-=-----

6' 

Date: t(~.)'-u( Time: /cit :rt_ /Iff 

Manifold Pressure: ___ ,_· _L{_,___ 

Fiow Setting: ---'~='...::Cc::;'S;z...;/.:.:J.t.A--::=-__ 

Range Zero Upscale 

Analyzer Calibration 

I 7 Response, ppm l/7(] 

Initial 

System Calibration (. 0 L((~'{ Response, ppm 

Initial 

System Cal. Bias, % 6tlf ;. 7 

Final 

System Calibration 

Response, ppm /, ) '-i~). i 

Final 

System Cal. Bias, % D. u /. l9S 

Drift,% ID.{Lj bb-;rSystem Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response - Analyzer Calibration 

Response)/Span x 100 

Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial System Calibration Response)/Span 

X 100 

Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is :t 5%. 

90 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
INTEGRATED BAG SAMPLE FIELD DATA 

Plant 0-enevcJ Skle . 

Location # :S 8' f1, \,.,_ td""' '-' :J= 

Date -"-fh- Sfz..t /o l 

Fj 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg. zs 7 + 

Sample Bag Leak Checked .____.---- ~ 

Operator /0?!1,,.:1 Liz )r. 

Sample Train Leak Checked __ .t...::::_ ___ _ 

Run# I Bag ID# P.wv,P \ Run# I Bag JD# ~;s;.\ '(__ Run# I Bag ID# f)...v.- .J1 .3 

TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. 

Point »1m Point .!lE Point 

~ 

1;/~ (')~<fLIA- I I;;~ I ,,_n /0/f_ /A I "..., ~ t) /) ill./<: It- I /o.~ I tl." 

' I I I 7 

' ~ '? I ~ I I '· I !L ~ I I 4-- ~ ,.,.-

I 1n I I '· I 1 I I,) I I I A- I I 1£ i 

r 7 I ' 2 I 7 I I I ~ ? I 

I I I I I 1.; 4 I I 

I<" I I (' ~ 

/(~Cl<lY> I I I ' 1\J Ill~ I 1. \ I l7li:f-l ~ v I \\/ 

I I I 

I I I I I - __ _!__ ____ 

I l I I I I 

I I I I I 

I I I I 

I I I 

I T I I 

I I I I I 

I I I I I I I 

I I I l I I I 

I I I I I I I I I 

I I I I I I I I I 

I I I i I I I I 

I I I I I I I I 

I I I I I I I I 

I I I I I I I I I 

I I I I I I I I I I 

A•terase [ (). ) I o u Average I o) I c~.o I Ave rase j ;J, ') f 0 , (_) 

GUA~DIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 

92 
- 

----------------------

/' 

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION ' 

'!ant G,Q_I-...)e__lal SI-B.~ Time of Analysis /C ·co l£31~ (_]tJG 

.::>ource 1P- "'S K.i N p () hAuft Orsat I Fyrite 10 # >fl4,rS '2 

Sample Type(~lntegrated, ~) __ ~ Fyrite Leak Check 7 () 

Analytical Method 02S);/ Date 0 /d.d .:r (.l I 

Run _I 1 2 3 Average Net Multiplier Molecular 

I Actual 

Volume Weight 

Actual Net Actual Net Net 

co, I 3.~v I 3-~ I JL- 0,_[,.. I 3-i"" 3lc I 3. Lo I 0.44 I '· sp,v o, IS l<· I \L,.r Is l.., I L.,.D \Q -lr I ll.-(1 lie-D I 0.32 Is-- I.Jo 

co I I I 0.28 I 

N, I 'Co.y 0.28 GJ.SJJ 

COMMENTS: TOTAL lA. d tLP 

Run_j_ 1 I 2 3 Average Net Multiplier Molecular 

Volume Weight 

Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net 

co, 3.tc j-(_, 3LP I 3.(_, 3G 3 .lo 3L- 0.44 IJ. 5bl-1 

o, )Ci,_r. l~.d- l c, .'[\ ll·. d \Ci c, I 11c. ; I \{,, J. I 0.32 -c~ I 5, /'OU 

co I I I 0.28 I 

N, I ft_---,_J_ I 0.28 [;zJ.45(c 

COMMENTS: TOTAL (;2<; ,J)Lf 

Run_3 1 I 2 3 Average Net Multiplier ~\-Jolec:.Jlar 

I Actual I Actual I Volume Weight 

Actual Net Net Net 

I co, 3 -~ I 3 t:} I :s.0, I 3 f'.· I 3o I 3 e I JS I 0.44 IJ.t...-=+:J I 

o, L~o[, l,{c a I .lb o l,r,...) I~Jb I ltc.J I \L ~ I 0.32 1'5./f:l/ 

co I I I I I I I 0.23 I I 

I N, I I I I I I I f';o c I ln,%c I 

0.23 I 

COMMENTS: ;} ' ;) I I TOTAL 1A. ~!}(,_- I 

AL YST (Signat1.1re/Oate) ill; ~cr;-1-- I Cf-2/-c/ 

I v 

'-~! I 

GUAJ:lDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

93 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

S02 NOx 

TIME 

GENKY.DAT 

09/21/01 12:19:56 

ppm ppm 

General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

S02 NOx 

TIME ppm ppm 

CALIBRATIONS 

09121/01 05:30:54 -55.387 1.6682 

09/21/01 05:35:12 -53.084 472.35 

09/21/01 05:35:17 -52.751 471.26 

09121/01 06:40:20 -38.738 254.07 

09/21/01 06:40:22 -38.443 253.75 

09/21/01 06:40:29 -38.619 252.42 

09/21/01 07:26:22 9.842 471.57 

09/21/01 07:26:23 9.591 462.13 

09121/01 07:26:26 9.6881 460.3 

09/21/01 07:29:21 10.325 2.3596 

09121/01 07:37:24 7.7254 0.32023 

09/21/01 07:39:56 451.18 -0.12776 

09/21/01 07:42:31 252.77 1.6725 

09121/01 07:47:28 7.643 0.2376 

09121/01 08:06:41 440.25 -0.34519 

RUN 1 

09/21/01 08:46:34 329.09 49.589 

09121/01 08:47:04 329.74 51.05 

09/21/01 08:47:34 331.9 47.006 

09/21/01 08:48:04 339.45 47.445 

09121/01 08:48:35 345.28 49.594 

09/21/01 08:49:04 342.48 49.685 

09/21/01 08:49:34 297.14 42.588 

09/21/01 08:50:04 251.15 35.256 

09/21/01 08:50:34 239.6 31.991 

09121/01 08:51:04 235.5 30.816 

09/21/01 08:51:34 235.82 30.373 

09/21/01 08:52:04 244.16 30.863 

09/21/01 08:52:34 250.4 30.003 

09121/01 08:53:04 249.21 30.203 

94 GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc 
r General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/01 08:53:34 

09/21/01 08:54:05 

09/21/01 08:54:34 

09/21/01 08:55:04 

09/21/01 08:55:34 

09/21/01 08:56:04 

09/21/01 08:56:34 

09/21/01 08:57:04 

09/21/01 08:57:34 

09/21/01 08:58:05 

09/21/01 08:58:34 

09/21/01 08:59:04 

09/21/01 08:59:34 

09/21/01 09:00:04 

09/21/01 09:00:34 

09/21/01 09:01 :04 

09/21/01 09:01:34 

09/21/01 09:02:05 

09/21/01 09:02:34 

09/21/01 09:03:04 

09/21/01 09:03:35 

09/21/01 09:04:04 

09/21/01 09:04:34 

09/21/01 09:05:04 

09/21/01 09:05:34 

09/21/01 09:06:05 

09/21/01 09:06:34 

09/21/01 09:07:04 

09/21/01 09:07:35 

09/21/01 09:08:05 

09/21/01 09:08:35 

09/21/01 09:09:05 

09/21/01 09:09:35 

09/21/01 09;10:05 

09/21/01 09:10:35 

09/21/01 09:11:05 

09/21/01 09:11:35 

09/21/01 09:12:05 

09/21/01 09:12:35 

09/21/01 09:13:05 

09/21/01 09:13:35 

09/21/01 09:14:05 

09/21/01 09:14:35 

09/21/01 09:15:05 

09/21/01 09:15:35 

95 

502 NOx 

ppm 

250.72 

256.87 

301.35 

313.87 

295.41 

289.8 

275.66 

288.5 

301.02 

298.11 

289.26 

290.99 

295.2 

297.79 

296.06 

300.16 

303.51 

314.52 

316.57 

313.26 

310.09 

311.53 

316.79 

319.27 

322.07 

325.42 

334.38 

346.79 

346.15 

346.15 

342.58 

342.04 

347.66 

347.23 

332.98 

317.54 

317.76 

319.7 

319.38 

312.14 

313.76 

322.51 

318.3 

317.22 

311.71 

ppm 

31.186 

32.308 

36.583 

39.518 

42.488 

44.593 

45.876 

45.667 

46.815 

47.898 

49.859 

49.328 

46.384 

46.641 

48.867 

49.293 

48.189 

45.789 

47.737 

49.733 

50.95 

47.911 

46.984 

49.42 

51.694 

50.811 

47.241 

48.359 

49.272 

50.65 

49.437 

47.124 

48.137 

49.759 

49.08 

46.089 

43.545 

45.001 

46.245 

47.371 

44.554 

43.936 

45.806 

46.78 

47.184 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09121/01 09:16:35 

09/21/01 09:17:05 

09/21/01 09:17:35 

09121/01 09:18:05 

09/21/01 09:18:35 

09121/01 09:19:05 

09/21/01 09:19:35 

09121/01 09:20:05 

09/21/01 09:20:35 

09121/01 09:21:05 

09121/01 09:21:35 

09/21/01 09:22:05 

09121/01 09:22:35 

09/21/01 09:23:05 

09/21/01 09:23:35 

09121/01 09:24:05 

09121/01 09:24:35 

09121/01 09:25:05 

09121/01 09:25:35 

09/21/01 09:26:05 

09121/01 09:26:35 

09121/01 09:27:05 

09/21/01 09:27:35 

09121/01 09:28:05 

09/21/01 09:28:35 

09121/01 09:29:05 

09/21/01 09:29:35 

09/21/01 09:30:05 

09/21/01 09:30:35 

09121/01 09:31:05 

09/21/01 09:31:35 

09/21/01 09:32:05 

09/21/01 09:32:35 

09/21/01 09:33:05 

09121/01 09:33:35 

09/21/01 09:34:05 

09121/01 09:34:35 

09/21/01 09:35:05 

09/21/01 09:35:35 

09/21/01 09:36:05 

09/21/01 09:36:35 

09121/01 09:37:05 

09/21/01 09:37:35 

09/21/01 09:38:05 

09/21/01 09:38:35 

96 

502 NOx 

ppm 

241.55 

117.94 

69.517 

52.091 

44.22 

150.07 

248.99 

285.59 

298.33 

313.9 

315.17 

314.95 

314.3 

323.26 

328.12 

324.99 

311.6 

312.36 

319.92 

324.56 

327.58 

332.44 

341.07 

351.11 

352.84 

352.95 

347.98 

351.44 

357.91 

356.73 

345.39 

325.85 

325.85 

328.55 

324.45 

314.41 

307.29 

316.39 

321.64 

322.43 

320.78 

324.56 

319.05 

316.25 

313.65 

ppm 

45.23 

43.9555 

41.0596 

40.28535 

35.8515 

36.365 

44.067 

46.663 

45.071 

44.054 

45.115 

46.55 

46.876 

43.397 

45.323 

46.119 

47.876 

46.745 

44.941 

47.032 

50.068 

50.35 

47.754 

47.789 

49.02 

50.894 

50.585 

47.015 

48.124 

49.65 

50.65 

49.25 

46.493 

48.002 

49.494 

49.672 

48.045 

46.585 

48.241 

50.316 

50.946 

47.967 

48.141 

49.567 

49.528 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/01 09:39:35 

09/21/01 09:40:05 

09/21/01 09:40:35 

09/21/01 09:41:05 

09/21/01 09:41:35 

09/21/01 09:42:05 

09/21/01 09:42:35 

09/21/01 09:43:05 

09/21/01 09:43:35 

09/21/01 09:44:05 

09/21/01 09:44:35 

09/21/01 09:45:05 

09/21/01 09:45:35 

09/21/01 09:46:05 

09/21/01 09:46:35 

09/21/01 09:51:37 

09/21/01 09:52:16 

09/21/01 09:55:09 

09/21/01 09:55:11 

09/21/01 09:55:13 

09/21/01 09:58:10 

09/21/01 10:18:31 

09/21/01 10:19:01 

09/21/01 10:19:31 

09/21/01 10:20:01 

09/21/01 10:20:31 

09/21/0110:21:01 

09/21/01 10:21:31 

09/21/01 10:22:01 

09/21/01 10:22:31 

09/21/01 10:23:01 

09/21/01 10:23:31 

09/21/01 10:24:01 

09/21/01 10:24:31 

09/21/01 10:25:01 

09/21/01 10:25:31 

09/21/01 10:26:01 

09/21/01 10:26:31 

09/21/01 10:27:01 

502 

ppm 

313.58 

317.54 

312.04 

310.74 

308.58 

313.33 

314.73 

311.93 

309.66 

314.52 

320.27 

324.45 

319.27 

316.25 

318.73 

436.5 

440.49 

42.578 

42.265 

41.844 

9.6797 

RUN 2 

97 

263.6 

262.49 

249.97 

245.97 

252.99 

259.68 

256.77 

252.37 

253.1 

263.06 

268.35 

268.1 

264.86 

267.99 

267.88 

264.65 

260.22 

260.22 

NOx 

ppm 

46.733 

48.606 

49.937 

50.576 

49.641 

48.302 

49.25 

50.95 

50.907 

48.563 

49.646 

50.202 

51.385 

51.868 

49.067 

-0.3017 

42.823 

462.82 

460.52 

460 

0.96388 

42.775 

45.006 

45.889 

47.115 

46.419 

48.063 

48.885 

49.646 

47.611 

47.085 

48.646 

50.376 

50.346 

47.998 

48.028 

48.95 

48.919 

48.419 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
( General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

.TIME 

09/21/0110:28:01 

09/21/01 10:28:31 

09/21/0110:29:01 

09/21/0110:29:31 

09/21/0110:30:01 

09/21/01 10:30:31 

09/21/0110:31:01 

09/21/01 10:31:31 

09/21/0110:32:01 

09/21/0110:32:31 

09/21/0110:33:01 

09/21/0110:33:31 

09/21/01 10:34:01 

09/21/0110:34:31 

09/21/01 10:35:01 

09/21/0110:35:31 

09/21/0110:36:01 

09/21/01 10:36:31 

09/21/01 10:37:01 

09/21/01 10:37:31 

09/21/01 10:38:01 

09/21/01 10:38:31 

09/21/01 10:39:01 

09/21/01 10:39:31 

09/21/0110:40:01 

09/21/01 10:40:31 

09/21/01 10:41:01 

09/21/0110:41:31 

09/21/01 10:42:01 

09/21/0110:42:31 

09/21/01 10:43:01 

09/21/0110:43:31 

09/21/01 10:44:01 

09/21/0110:44:31 

09/21/01 10:45:01 

09/21/01 10:45:31 

09/21/01 10:46:01 

09/21/01 10:46:31 

09/21/0110:47:01 

09/21/01 10:47:31 

09/21/0110:48:01 

09/21/01 10:48:31 

09/21/01 10:49:01 

09/21/01 10:49:31 

09/21/01 10:50:01 

98 

502 NOx 

ppm 

273.28 

277.71 

280.73 

279.22 

282.24 

285.8 

286.24 

287.1 

293.36 

299.87 

300.05 

298.54 

298.54 

301.24 

304.48 

292.5 

269.83 

257.09 

264.43 

267.48 

264.43 

265.29 

263.46 

268.64 

267.35 

264.97 

267.78 

269.83 

277.06 

272.96 

270.61 

267.24 

272.09 

274.36 

258.93 

260.33 

270.58 

272.23 

270.26 

266.91 

258.82 

261.95 

274.36 

274.47 

276.09 

ppm 

48.428 

49.698 

48.95 

47.998 

47.932 

49.663 

49.785 

49.541 

47.754 

48.859 

49.711 

50.189 

49.067 

46.945 

47.35 

47.68 

46.91 

46.071 

44.923 

45.541 

46.293 

46.876 

45.175 

44.671 

45.219 

46.645 

46.75 

44.614 

44.914 

46.432 

46.772 

45.954 

43.901 

45.11 

46.945 

48.624 

46.506 

45.397 

46.35 

46.689 

46.728 

44.871 

45.728 

47.493 

47.619 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/01 10:51:01 

09/21/01 10:51:31 

09/21/01 10:52:01 

09/21/01 10:52:31 

09/21/01 10:53:01 

09/21/0110:53:31 

09/21/01 10:54:01 

09/21/01 10:54:31 

09/21/0110:55:01 

09/21/01 10:55:31 

09/21/01 10:56:01 

09/21/01 10:56:31 

09/21/0110:57:01 

09/21/01 10:57:31 

09/21/01 10:58:01 

09/21/01 10:58:31 

09121/01 10:59:01 

09/21/01 10:59:31 

09/21/01 11.:00:01 

09/21/01 11:00:31 

09/21/01 11:01:01 

09/21/01 11:01:31 

09121/0111:02:01 

09/21/01 11:02:31 

09/21/01 11:03:01 

09/21/01 11:03:31 

09/21/01 11:04:01 

09/21/01 11:04:31 

09/21/0111:05:01 

09/21/01 11:05:31 

09/21/01 11:06:01 

09/21/01 11:06:31 

09/21/01 11:07:01 

09/21/01 11:07:31 

09/21/01 11:08:01 

09/21/01 11:08:31 

09/21/01 11:09:01 

09/21/01 11:09:31 

09121/0111:10:01 

09/21/0111:10:31 

09/21/01 11:11:01 

09/21/0111:11:31 

09/21/01 11:12:01 

09/21/01 11:12:31 

09/21/0111:13:01 

99 

802 NOx 

ppm 

284.94 

293.04 

293.14 

288.97 

290.12 

304.91 

313.65 

312.58 

311.1 

308.69 

314.09 

308.9 

296.6 

283.54 

285.05 

285.16 

284.94 

282.67 

279.11 

280.08 

280.76 

280.51 

280.84 

278.03 

288.83 

290.55 

286.88 

285.48 

286.56 

287.56 

291.31 

291.42 

297.68 

304.51 

302.75 

298.22 

295.2 

291.96 

295.41 

294.9 

296.28 

293.79 

303.08 

306.64 

305.45 

ppm 

46.223 

47.371 

49.067 

49.381 

48.024 

47.798 

50.054 

51.407 

51.034 

48.137 

48.511 

49.659 

49.646 

49.215 

47.01 

48.554 

50.05 

50.846 

49.285 

47.002 

49.351 

50.011 

50.772 

48.519 

48.241 

50.459 

50.955 

50.472 

47.967 

48.459 

49.498 

51.337 

50.607 

49.781 

50.054 

51.885 

52.485 

49.376 

48.885 

50.033 

50.95 

5212 

49.146 

49.598 

51.707 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

502 NOx 

TIME ppm ppm 

09/21/01 11:14:01 303.08 51.955 

09/21/0111:14:31 310.23 48.524 

09/21/01 11:15:01 322.07 49.05 

09/21/01 11:15:31 327.58 50.294 

09/21/0111:16:01 327.51 52.017 

09/21/01 11:16:31 329.63 50.25 

09/21/0111:17:01 339.89 49.063 

09/21/0111:17:31 337.73 49.867 

09/21/01 11:18:01 320.46 48.915 

09/21/0111:18:31 296.71 47.354 

09/21/01 11:19:01 295.52 44.667 

09/21/01 11:19:31 304.48 44.401 

09/21/0111:32:13 444.27 1.7331 

09/21/01 11 :32:43 444.7 21.228 

09/21/01 11:38:42 9.7938 462.87 

RUN 3 

09/21/01 11:47:24 317.47 47.333 

09/21/0111:47:54 313.11 46.363 

09/21/01 11:48:24 318.44 44.745 

09/21/01 11:48:54 324.23 46.623 

09/21/01 11:49:24 324.48 48.163 

09/21/01 11:49:54 319.48 48.385 

09/21/0111:50:24 320.02 46.097 

09/21/01 11:50:54 333.41 45.797 

09/21/0111:51:24 336.76 47.206 

09/21/0111:51:54 335.14 47.993 

09/21/0111:52:24 335.57 47.78 

09/21/01 11:52:54 339.24 45.789 

09/21/01 11 :53:24 343.56 45.871 

09/21/0111:53:54 345.82 47.954 

09/21/0111:54:24 351.11 49.046 

09/21/01 11:54:54 354.03 48.106 

09/21/0111:55:24 359.53 47.063 

09/21/01 11:55:54 370.43 48.554 

09/21/01 11:56:24 367.09 49.133 

09/21/0111:56:54 364.5 48.967 

09/21/01 11:57:24 364.93 46.689 

09/21/01 11:57:54 377.38 46.467 

09/21/0111:58:24 378.75 46.793 

09/21/01 11:58:54 377.56 49.167 

GUARDIAN 

100 

SYSTEMS Inc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/0111:59:54 

09/21/01 12:00:24 

09/21/01 12:00:54 

09/21/0112:01:24 

09/21/01 12:01:54 

09/21/01 12:02:24 

09/21/01 12:02:54 

09/21/01 12:03:24 

09/21/01 12:03:54 

09/21/01 12:04:24 

09/21/01 12:04:54 

09/21/01 12:05:24 

09/21/01 12:05:54 

09/21/01 12:06:24 

09/21/01 12:06:54 

09/21/01 12:07:24 

09/21/01 12:07:54 

09/21/01 12:08:24 

09/21/01 12:08:54 

09/21/01 12:09:24 

09/21/01 12:09:54 

09/21/01 12:10:24 

09/21/01 12:10:54 

09/21/01 12:11:24 

09/21/0112:11:54 

09/21/01 12:12:24 

09/21/01 12:12:54 

09/21/01 12:13:24 

09/21101 12:13:54 

09/21/01 12:14:24 

09/21101 12:14:54 

09/21101 12:15:24 

09/21/01 12:15:54 

09/21101 12:16:24 

09/21/01 12:16:54 

09/21/01 12:17:24 

09/21101 12:17:54 

09/21/01 12:18:24 

09/21/01 12:18:54 

09/21101 12:19:24 

09/21/01 12:19:54 

09/21/01 12:20:24 

09/21/01 12:20:54 

09/21/01 12:21:24 

09/21/0112:21:54 

101 

502 NOx 

ppm 

369.03 

369.36 

351.54 

338.05 

334.6 

342.26 

351.33 

348.52 

344.42 

344.85 

348.74 

342.91 

338.59 

336.86 

341.22 

347.12 

347.12 

341.86 

339.02 

341.72 

342.3 

336.47 

338.81 

338.05 

348.31 

350.9 

348.31 

341.4 

342.15 

346.9 

348.31 

348.85 

350.68 

353.92 

359.42 

361.58 

363.42 

362.34 

373.67 

377.24 

371.84 

367.3 

372.05 

378.64 

366.26 

ppm 

47.241 

46.61 

45.271 

44.575 

44.123 

42.497 

43.727 

45.141 

45.797 

44.928 

43.697 

43.371 

44.462 

44.923 

44.014 

42.318 

44.488 

45.106 

45.349 

42.897 

42.958 

44.51 

45.232 

43.514 

43.219 

44.332 

45.336 

45.884 

44.032 

43.323 

44.14 

45.819 

46.384 

45.984 

46.554 

47.228 

48.419 

47.389 

45.876 

47.902 

48.698 

49.05 

47.584 

47.719 

47.541 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/01 12:22:54 

09/21/01 12:23:24 

09/21/01 12:23:54 

09/21/0112:24:24 

09/21/01 12:24:54 

09/21/01 12:25:24 

09/21/01 12:25:54 

09/21/01 12:26:24 

09/21/0112:26:54 

09/21/01 12:27:24 

09/21/01 12:27:54 

09/21/01 12:28:24 

09/21/01 12:28:54 

09/21/01 12:29:24 

09/21/01 12:29:54 

09/21/01 12:30:24 

09/21/01 12:30:54 

09/21/01 12:31:24 

09/21/01 12:31:54 

09/21/01 12:32:24 

09/21/01 12:32:54 

09/21/01 12:33:24 

09/21/0112:33:54 

09/21/01 12:34:24 

09/21/01 12:34:54 

09/21/01 12:35:24 

09/21/01 12:35:54 

09/21/01 12:36:24 

09/21/01 12:36:54 

09/21/01 12:37:24 

09/21/01 12:37:54 

09/21/01 12:38:24 

09/21/01 12:38:54 

09/21/01 12:39:24 

09/21/01 12:39:54 

09/21/01 1:1:40:24 

09/21/01 12:40:54 

09/21/01 12:41:24 

09/21/01 12:41:54 

09/21/01 12:42:24 

09/21/01 12:42:54 

09/21/01 12:43:24 

09/21/01 12:43:54 

09/21/01 12:44:24 

09/21/01 12:44:54 

102 

502 

ppm 

338.91 

335.28 

342.37 

341.29 

340.53 

333.98 

340.75 

332.98 

327.04 

317.03 

319.38 

327.9 

333.3 

333.52 

336.68 

337.3 

342.58 

337.3 

334.16 

330.49 

338.48 

343.77 

341.5 

334.27 

332.44 

339.45 

339.78 

336.86 

333.3 

337.51 

345.07 

345.39 

345.07 

346.36 

351.44 

351.11 

346.04 

346.25 

347.33 

353.49 

353.38 

335.14 

329.52 

325.35 

328.44 

NOx 

ppm 

47.315 

45.076 

45.976 

47.832 

49.38 

48.998 

46.432 

47.284 

48.511 

49.02 

47.119 

45.306 

46.541 

48.502 

49.929 

46.637 

47.393 

48.867 

49.507 

48.946 

47.197 

47.845 

49.607 

50.681 

49.02 

47.445 

48.228 

49.393 

51.059 

48.906 

48.285 

49.767 

51.911 

50.594 

48.267 

49.293 

50.281 

50.581 

50.228 

48.741 

48.402 

48.132 

46.145 

45.615 

44.136 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
General Shale 

Louisville, Kentucky 

#38 Kiln Exhaust 

TIME 

09/21/01 12:45:54 

09/21/01 12:46:24 

09/21/01 12:46:54 

09/21/01 12:47:24 

09/21/01 12:47:54 

09/21/01 12:48:24 

09/21/01 12:48:54 

09/21/01 12:49:24 

09/21/01 12:49:54 

09/21/01 12:50:24 

09/21/01 12:50:54 

09/21/01 12:51:24 

09/21/01 12:51:54 

09/21/01 12:52:24 

09/21/01 12:55:14 

09/21/01 13:00:26 

09/21/01 13:03:49 

09/21/01 13:18:59 

103 

502 

ppm 

325.53 

324.13 

328.88 

329.85 

326.5 

322.94 

318.84 

319.48 

324.45 

325.31 

320.13 

315.09 

320.17 

-809.69 

47.941 

441.62 

48.517 

10.79 

NOx 

ppm 

47.263 

47.35 

44.645 

46.515 

47.767 

48.493 

47.637 

45.336 

46.45 

48.393 

49.25 

47.307 

46.302 

52.646 

467.57 

1.97329 

-1.2529 

-2.8166 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
VI. CALl BRA TIONS 

Meter Box 

The meter box is initially calibrated every 6 months at fixed settings using a set of 

calibrated orifices. Upon return to the laboratory from this test the meter box was recalibrated using the average meter pressure for the test series. The recalibration point shall be 

the closest point to the initial calibration (for an average meter pressure of 1.494 a 2.0 

"H20 was used as the recalibration point). These recalibrations produced a single point 

MCF and a ~H@ which shall be compared to the original average calibration to see if they 

are within the 5% allowed at the highest vacuum seen. These recalibration sheets are 

located behind the original calibration sheets 

Pitot Tubes 

The S type tubes are calibrated against a standard pitot tube (Cp=0.99) in a wind 

tunnel with a capacity to generate a test section velocity of approximately 3000feet/minute 

every 6 months. Additionally the pitot tube is measured as to its specifications and 

alignment. Upon return, the intercomponent spacings and the face opening alignment of 

the pitot tube assembly were rechecked and if no changes are noticed; it shall be assumed 

that the coefficient of the assembly had not changed. 

Temperature Measurements 

All temperature devices (impinger, meter box, hot box and stack) are calibrated 

every 6 months against an ASTM mercury-in-glass reference thermometer or a reference 

thermocouple and potentiometer calibrated by fixed points, e.g., ice bath and boiling water 

(corrected to barometric pressure). Upon return the stack temperature device was 

recalibrated within 10% of the average absolute stack temperature. If the device being 

tested agrees within 1.5% of the reference device, the temperature data taken in the field 

shall be considered valid. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS enc 

105 
V. PLANT OPERATIONAL DATA 

The following information was supplied by Mr. Phil Towles of General Shale 

Products Corporation for the emission tests on the #38 Tunnel Kiln on September.21, 2001 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

106 
\ 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 

PARTICULATE FIELD QA/QC DATA 

(to be filled out on test site) 

cuENT. ~ue cal ShaJ.e DATE: 9/Jji@J 

SOURCE TESTED:# 38 j{; }N erfau;t 1YPE CONTROL DEVICE: L !m-e $Ciubbet t ¥uee__ 

TEST METHOD USED: c2(o A 

CONTROLAGEN1CY::~~~~~~. 

1. Was Calibration 

2. Was orifice leak 

:/:: 

.. 

What was leak 

3. 

4. Was previous source used to determine K factor? 

5. 

::~~l~~ ........ 6. e n1air1tai11ed at 248 ± 25' F? } 

7. 

8. Were gas sampling bags leak checked? 

9. Were sample containers labeled and levels marked? 

10. Were sample bottles stored in a secured container? 

11 . Was sample recovery performed on site? 

List filter #'s 1. 30 J !51 2. 30J /0 le 3. 30 lt S 3 

Additional comments: 

GUAI=lDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

107 
1. 

2. 

3. 

4 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 

PARTICULATE FIELD QA/QC DATA 

Pitot leak c.'leck. 

Nozzle 

Ambient o, 

Ambient co, 

Probe;; 

TemperattJre Device~ 

Hot Box# 

Nozzle I 0 # 

Condenser# 

(continued) 

Run 1 R 4-le ts 3,(, 

'5.1 /g 4.,;) ' 

tsS-+ 

\D 

oost-test 

R S Its y,J 

R/o.lts5.f.. 

R s.~, s'-15 

CFM 

Ci=,'.! 

INc:-;::s 

-"· INC:-:ES 

INC:-i::S 

0/ 

,, 

" ,, 

GUAf=iDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

108 

. 
VI. CALl BRA TIONS Continued 

Barometric Pressure 

An aneroid barometer capable of measuring atmospheric pressure to within 0.1 

inches Hg was used. If this device is defective the following alternate method shall be 

used. The barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service 

station, in which case the station value (which is the absolute barometric pressure) shall 

be requested and an adjustment for elevation differences between the weather station and 

sampling point shall be applied at a rate of minus 0.1 inches Hg per 100 feet elevation 

increase or vice versa for elevation decrease. 

Specific Test Equipment and Measurements 

The equipment used during these tests was as follows: 

Location: Exhaust 

Probe: 4-2 

Meter Box: 1000 

Stack Temp: n 10 

Sample Box: #10 & #9 

lmpinger #7 

Avg. Temp: 271 

Rec. Temp: 250 

The Omega 10 was recalibrated at the recalibration temperatures indicated. The 

temperature devices agreed exactly with its initial calibration values. The intercomponent 

spacing and the face opening alignment of the Pitot Tube assembly was rechecked and 

no changes were noticed; therefore, it was assumed that the coefficient of the assembly 

had not changed. 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

109 
Type A 

Glass Fiber Filters 

FEATURES 

• High tensile strength. • Excellent handling characteristics. • Good wetting properties. • Minimum of 99.9% 

retention _for particles of .3 I'm as determined by DOP 

tests. • Binder free. 

This is the original glass fiber filter pioneered by Gelman 

Instrument Company over 15 years ago. It continues to 

be widely used for high volume sampling. Since zinc is 

one of the raw materials incorporated in the glass fibers. 

Type A Filters have a variable zinc content. Another component of the filter, sulfuric acid, is used as a dispersion 

medium. making the sheets unsuitable for measurement 

of sulfates. 

Type A Glass Fiber Filters are less likely to develop static 

charge ortear than other glass fiber media types. They are 

used extensively in applications where zinc and iron content is not important. or where sulfate content is not being 

determined. 

Size 37 mm 47 mm 102 mm s··x1o·· 

Product No. 61715 61694 61696 61701 

Filters/ Pkg. 500 100 100 100 

TYPE A GLASS FIBER FILTER 

SPECIFICATION REPORT 

The following pnysoc:allcl'lemucal propenoes reprnenl tygoc:al. -age vatun OOIOionecl 

in accordanc:e wotn Oiccepted tesl mesnods. Tney ate sub,ect 10 normal manulac:sunnq 

'W.IIIOiiiOns and Ill SUCIPiiecl U I tecnnocao SlrYICe. Tlttl ltl.ii)'siS hU Oeen tr1¥le Ill 

acco~f!CI .,,,,.. EPA proc•tJures tmoetogtilms.B" .- ur shflt}. 

ELEMENTS: 

Antimony ................. 30 

Arsenic ................... 30 

Beryllium .................. 1 

Bismuth .•.•.............. 10 

Cadmium ....•............. 5 

Chromium ................ 10 

Cobalt .................... 10 

Copper . . . . . . . . . ...• 2 

Iron . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .2300 

Lead . .. .. .. .. 20 

Manganese .............. 200 

Mercury ................. 100 

Molybdenum .............. 10 

Nickel .................... 10 

Selenium ............... 5000 

Tin ....................... 10 

Titanium ...... ~· ....... ·.170 

Vanadium .•.•.. , : . ....... 10 

Zinc ................... 5000 

to 25.000 

OTHER PHYSICALS: 

BSO 

"pH ............ .. 

OOP @320/cm/min 

.. 522 

.. .. 8.5 

(ASTM Method 2986 .99.9% 

Tensile Strength 

(Fed. Spec. UUP318) .750 gr 

Weight. 

8"xl0" sheet ....... 4.0:::.3 gr. 

Flow Resistance (Max.) 

@ 320 em/min ......... 60 mm 

Flow Rate (air) 

lpm/cm1 @ 70 em Hg ..... SO 

Max. Use Temp ......... 40()-C 

Static Properties ...... Low 

Ability to 

Fold . . . . . . . . . . .Excellent 

WATER EXTRACTABLE IONS: 

Sulfate .100 Chloride.... . .1500 

Nitrate ........... .50 Fluoride . . . ......... 15 

Ammonia.... . .. 20 

';:111 G•1m01n Proceour• 

A 500 ml doslllled ..,;u•r 

a. Add 15 drOOS ntur~J·d l<CI SOlUtiOn 

C. Shred one !"•10'' SMHI ~ncl soa11. on or•oari'Cl ..,~fer lor one hour 

0. Aun OH ~~ amoo•nt~emo.ratur•. 

TypeAJE 

Glass Fiber Filters 

FEATURES 

• Low trace metals. • Medium Handling characteristics. 

• Available in all sizes. • Minimum of 99..9% retention 

for particles of .31'm as determined byOOPtests. • Binder'free. 

type .AJE Gl~ Fiber Filters are composed of low acid soluble glass fiber. They contain low levels of both zinc and 

iron. The filters do react with atmospheric sulfur dioxide; 

and therefore. when high levels of sulfur are expected. 

corrections for this reaction should be accounted for. 

Type .AJE Glass Fiber Filters are binder free and ideal far 

gravimetric analysis of air pollutants. This pure. organic 

free filter is the basis far procedures widely used in determining municipal and industrial air polluting substances. 

Size 25mm 37mm 47mm 102mm S'"x10'" 

Product No. 61630 61652 61631 61633 61638 

Filters/Pkg. 500 500 100 100 100 

TYPE AlE GLASS FIBER FILTER 

SPECIFICATION REPORT 

Thelollowtng pn)'Sieallchenvcaf prop«t1es represent rypoca.~..wes oa1ame<1 

in .lccordance -ch Oiccec:nld test ITMthods. They,,. JUbtKt ID,....... manufacturing 

var111ions &rtd 1r• SIJCIPii«< as a tech"'cal Hrv•CI. n.. ~ liar Men made "' 

ICCOI'dance -rft EPA DI'OCttiUfe$ (ff'HCrOI}ratfl£r ~ 1fT" m-J. 

ELEMENTS: 

Antimony ................• 20 

Arsenic ................... 20 

Beryllium .................. 1 

Bismuth ................•. 10 

Cadmium .................. 2 

Chromium .......•.......• 10 

Cobalt ...................• 10 

Copper .....•.......•...•.. 2 

Iron ..•............. 1Q0-1800 

Lead ....•..•........•...• 10 

Manganese ................ 2 

Mercury .................. 80 

Molybdenum .............. 10 

Nickel .................... 10 

Selenium ................ 200 

Tin ••••.........•••.••.•.. 10 

Titanium .................. 10 

Vanadium ................ 10 

Zinc •......•.•............ 90 

OTHER PHYSICALS: 

BSO .................... 522 

"pH ...................... 9.0 

DOP @320/cm/min 

ASTM Methods 2986) .. 99.9% 

Tensile Strength . 

(Fed. Spec. UUP31 8) .. 600 gr. 

Weight 

8''x10''sheet ....... 4.0::: .3 gr. 

Flow Resistance (Max.) 

@ 320 em/min. • ...•••. 80 mm 

Flow Rate (air) 

lpm/cm1@ 70 em Hg ..... 60 

M.ax. Use Temp ..•..... .4oo•c 

Static Properties ..... Medium 

Ability to 

F.old.......... . ... Good 

WATER EXTRACTABLE IONS: 

Sulfate .. . . . . ........... 600 Chloride. 

Nitrate....... . ..... 115 Fluoride ....... 

Ammonia. . ...... 13 

'pH-Getman Pro<;~ure: 

A. 500 ml dostolled wal•• 

a Add 15 droos Solllur~ted l<CJ solutoon. 

C Snread on• 8''l10'' $1'1"1 lncl so~Jt on ororo~•.;, ·~ler lOt 

onel'lour. 

0. Aun OH at ~moo•nt temoer~lure. 

.. .. 1500 

.... 87 

GUAI=lOIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 
l» ~ 

o-.·lm HI PIOB£ IS- IARIIUI') ~lllll 1-1~ PliOIE ua· ... UJIIIUPJ ~ 

... 

.. ~z:iD ~2SI - -.. .. ~liiD ~liiD "' ... 

1!5 ~ 

.... ~ ::llll c:; ... 

.... giQD !;100 

"' Q 

... -;! :Ill - IIU I Ill ul ~~~~ 

~ .. I 0 

• 2Q 411 II ID 0 & ~ iD u POWI$TAT S£TIUIG,) POIWTAT SfniiiC. \ 

1-11 PRO&£ (IS-c•A IAiliiUPi 

2!1 411 10 10 

POrtRHAT SETTih~. \ 

,,., GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

I I I 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

INITIAL CALl BRA TION 

Run Number 

Barometric Pres, in Hg 

Orifice pres drop, in H20 

Critical Orifice ld # 

K Factor 

Actual Vacuum, in Hg 

Gas Volume Dry !nit, CF 

Gas Volume Dry Final, CF 

Ambient Temp Initial, F 

Ambient Temp Final, F 

Dry Gas Temp !nit In, F 

Dry Gas Temp Final in, F 

Dry Gas Temp !nit Out, F 

Dry Gas Temp Final Out, F 

Run Time, sec 

Meter Calibration Factor, Y 

Average Y 

Less than +/- 0.02 from average 

Delta H@ 

Average H@ 

Less than +/- 0.20 from average 

Meter Box 1 000, Omega 10 

on 4-2-01 

1 2 3 

30.32 30.32 30.32 

0.66 1.2 2.1 

EG-48 EG-55 EG-63 

0.3456 0.4596 0.5946 

22.0 21.0 19.5 

922.676 927.679 932.873 

927.679 932.873 937.880 

73 68 68 

66 67 69 

75 70 71 

70 71 71 

74 70 70 

70 70 70 

642 504 378 

0.9676 0.9700 0.9737 

0.9704 

YES YES YES 

1.80 1.85 1.94 

1.89 

YES YES YES 

Signature ~ r/li-t=-

4 

30.32 

4 

EG-73 

0.8170 

17.0 

937.880 

942.889 

69 

68 

71 

72 

70 

71 

274 

0.9659 

YES 

1.95 

YES 

5 

30.32 

5.95 

EG-81 

1.0110 

15.0 

942.889 

947.985 

69 

69 

72 

74 

71 

71 

228 

0.9745 

YES 

1.90 

YES 

112 GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 
GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

Recalibration of Box 1000, OMEGA 10 

Project: 

Run Number 

Barometric Pres, in Hg 

Orifice pres drop, in H20 

Critical Orifice ld # 

K Factor 

Actual Vacuum, in Hg 

Gas Volume Dry lnit, CF 

Gas Volume Dry Final, CF 

Ambient Temp Initial, F 

Ambient Temp Final, F 

Dry Gas Temp lnit In, F 

Dry Gas Temp Final In, F 

Dry Gas Temp lnit Out, F 

Dry Gas Temp Final Out, F 

Run Time, sec 

Meter Calibration Factor, Y 

Delta H@ 

Previous Y 

Previous H@ 

Calibrated by: 

9-24-01 

General Shale Products Corp. Stack: 

Average Meter Pressure 1.494 

1 2 3 

29.92 29.92 29.92 

2.00 2.00 2.00 

EG-63 EG-63 EG-63 

0.5946 0.5946 0.5946 

20.0 20.0 20.0 

47.281 52.283 57.285 

52.283 57.285 62.311 

67 68 67 

67 67 68 

67 68 69 

68 69 70 

66 66 67 

66 67 67 

379 379 383 

0.9719 0.9729 0.9794 

1.88 1.88 1.88 

0.9704 % Difference 

1.89 % Difference 

'1. ; ;}/- ~ ..-------- ~---':.0__,~---·· .. ~~~~~-

Outlet 

Average 

29.92 

2.0 

EG-63 

0.5946 

20.0 

52.283 

57.293 

67 

67 

68 

69 

66 

67 

380.33 

0.9747 

1.88 

0.45% 

-0.54% 

Signature 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS enc 

113 
Actual 

Temperature. F 

50 

100 

150 

200 

250 

300 

350 

400 

450 

500 

550 

600 

650 

700 

750 

800 

850 

900 

950 

1000 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

Temperature Calibration for Omega-10 

on 4-2-01 on Box #1 000 

Reading 

Temperature. F 

Correction 

51 

101 

152 

202 

253 

303 

351 

401 

450 

500 

551 

602 

652 

701 

751 

800 

851 

900 

951 

1001 

in Reading. F 

-1 

-1 

-2 

-2 

-3 

-3 

-1 

-1 

0 

0 

-1 

-2 

-2 

-1 

-1 

0 

-1 

0 

-1 

-1 

Regression Output: 

Constant 

Std Err of Y Est 

R Squared 

No. of Observations 

Degrees of Freedom 

X Coefficient(s) 

Std Err of Coef. 

SIGNATURE 

1.001227 

0.0006523 

-1.845623 

0.8400857 

0.9999924 

20 

18 

Read Actual 

56 __ __:__; 54. 

~ct.~"i~---------

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS IMC 

114 
Hot Box 9 

Hot Box 10 

Hot Box 11 

Hot Box 12 

Hot Box 13 

Hot Box 14 

Hot Box 15 

SIGNATURE 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

Temperature Calibration for Hotboxes (Cont'd) 

4-2-01 

220 220 

250 251 

275 276 

220 220 

250 250 

275 275 

220 220 

250 251 

275 276 

220 222 

250 253 

275 276 

220 220 

250 252 

275 277 

220 221 

250 249 

275 274 

220 220 

250 251 

275 274 

0 

-1 

-1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

-1 

-1 

-2 

-3 

-1 

0 

-2 

-2 

-1 

1 

1 

0 

-1 

1 

115 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 
Device 

lmpinger 1 

lmpinger 2 

lmpinger3 

lmpinger4 

lmpinger 5 

lmpinger 6 

lmpinger7 

lmpinger 8 

SIGNATURE 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

Temperature Calibration for lmpingers 

on 4-2-01 

Actual Reading Correction 

Tem11erature, F Tem~rature, F in Reading, F 

40 41 -1 

55 57 -2 

75 77 -2 

40 40 0 

55 55 0 

75 76 -1 

40 40 0 

55 55 0 

75 75 0 

40 40 0 

55 56 -1 

75 76 -1 

40 41 -1 

55 56 -1 

75 75 0 

40 41 -1 

55 55 0 

75 77 -2 

40 38 2 

55 54 1 

75 75 0 

40 41 -1 

55 56 -1 

75 75 0 

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 

116 
Date: 4-30-01 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC 

Pitot Calibration Form 

Without nozzle 

Probe#: 4-2 

Calibrated By: lalan Kirby Average Velocity, f/m 3,944 

Run# 

1 

2 

3 

Pstd 

0.98 

0.98 

0.98 

Side A 

Ptype s 

1.40 

1.40 

1.40 

Is average deviation less than or equal to 0.01? 

Run# 

1 

2 

3 

Pstd 

0.98 

0.98 

0.98 

Side B 

Ptype s 

1.40 

1.40 

1.40 

Is average deviation less than or equal to 0.01? 

Is absolute value of the difference between each side 

equal to or less than 0.01 

Avg Cp= 

Avg Cp = 

Average PCF = 

SIGNATURE 

117 

Cp(s) 

0.828 

0.828 

0.828 

0.828 

Cp(s) 

0.828 

0.828 

0.828 

0.828 

0.828 

Avg= 

YES 

Avg = 

YES 

YES 

Deviation 

0.000 

0.000 

0.000 

0.000 

Deviation 

0.000 

0.000 

0.000 

0.000 

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS IMC 
IA'I BOC GASES 

CUSTOMER 

BOG KNOXVILLE TN 

2300 SYCAMORE DR 

KNOXVILLE, TN 37921 1773 

CUSTOMER PD NO: URS RADIAN FM088 

Previous Certification Oate(s): 

CYLINDER NO 

EXPIRATION DATE 

CERTIFICATION DATE 

CYLINDER PRESSURE 

PRODUCT ID NO 

LOT NUMBER 

Assay Laboratory 

SOC GASES 

1075 Cindare Drive 

Port Allen,LA 70767 

(225) 388 0900 

XC0002108 

10117102 

10/17/00 

2000 psig 

02003508 

408813 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

s calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Do~ment EPA-600197/121, Using Procedure G1. Ail Values certified 

le +/-1% NIST Traceable, 

. ~: ..• _if_ •• ' ~ ~- ' omP~-n·eribt~- · 

ITRICOXIDE -_j _, 

,:X,oEs oF NITROGEN, .• - ti. 

ITROGE'rJ' 

Type 

NTRM 81685 

Instrument/Make/Model 

Nico!e!/550/AO 19603531 

'age: 1 Of 1 

Do Not Use This Cytinder below 150 psig. Le. 1.0 Megapascal 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

LOTIO Cylinder No Concentration 

98060706 XC0035318 252.20 +I· 1.90 ppm NO/N2 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Principle 

FTIR 

118 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

10/13/00 

QA Approved c:J 

Expiration 

05101/02 
Assay Laboratory 

BOG GASES 

~11· BOC GASES 1075 Cinclare Drive 

Port Allen. LA 70767 

(225) 388 0900 

CUSTOMER 

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 

305 ASHEVILLE ROAD 

LEEDS, AL 350941406 

CUSTOMER PO NO: 146069 

Previous Certification Oate(s): 

·.CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

EPA Protocol Gas 

CYLINDER NO CC95905 

EXPIRATION DATE 11/29/02 

CERTIFICATION DATE 11/29/00 

CYLINDER PRESSURE 2000 psig 

PRODUCT ID NO 02003951 

LOT NUMBER 415381 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

'· 

.. \ 

This calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocot, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified 

to be +/-1% NIST Traceable. 

Compori8nts 

NITRIC OXIDE 

.AL OXIDES OF NITROGEN 

NITROGEN 

Type 

NTRM 81686 

lnstrumenUMake/Model 

- ----~--~--~--

NicoleU550/AD19603531 

Page: 1 Of 1 

LOTIO 

98060505 

Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. i.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

. Analytical Results 

Requested Mixture j:ertified ""- · · Conci!iltration 

475,00 PPITl - -

BALANCE GAS 

.. .469.5ppm 

',469.5ppm 

Analyticat 

uncertaifi~ _ ~; 

+f-1.00% NISTTraceable 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

Cylinder No Concentration 

XC-()03483B 502.00 +/- 3.50 ppm NO/N2 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Princi pie 

FTIR 

119 

QA Approved 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

~=:c--.··--·--

11/09/00 

Assay Oates 

11/20/00 & 11/28/00 

11/28/00 

Expiration 

02/01/02 
JSTOMER 

~~._;-

JARDIAN SYS-FIELD SEFy 

il'"::.:.SHEVILLE ROAD 

'EDS. AC 3509414J0 

JSTOMER P0 NO: GUARDIAN SYS. E7056 

evious ~ertificatio~ Date(s}: 

--~ 

< 

···-

-~-f' 

-. 

. CYLJNDER NO 

EXP,IRATION DATE 01103/03 

:CERTIFICATION DATE 01/03/01 

, CYuNDER PRESSURE 2000 psig 

PRODUCT ID NO : 02001315 

LOT NUMBER .:;, 413~~4 

.--···. --, 

;;:i?~'::':- libration'.Sfandard has 

-1 '*!Ntsrtiaceable. 

been certified per 1!1e 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-000/97/121, Using 

; .. ---.-"' 

pe 

RM 81661X 

;truiiientJMake/Model 

;oleV550/AD1{603531 

Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 pslg._i.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

LOTIO Cylinder No Concentration 

98061112 XC004998B 246.10 +1- 1. 70 ppm S02f!'l2 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Principle 

FTIR 

120 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

01/02101 

/)' 

._.:':, 

: ,.-_: 

".:..:lt., 

Expiration _ -~l 

10/02/02 

;~~: 
( 

I.IIBOC GASES 

Assay Laboratory 

BOC Gases 

1075 Cindaire Drive 

Port Allen, LA 70767 

(225) 338 0900 

CUSTOMER 

GUARDIAN SYS-FIELD SERV 

305 ASHEVILLE ROAD 

ATIN: TOM LOTZ SR 

LEEDS, AL 350941406 

CUSTOMER PO NO: 11057 

Previous Certification Date(s): 

CYUNDERNO 

EXPIRATION DATE 

CERn FICA TION DATE 

CYLINDER PRESSURE 

PRODUCT ID NO: 

LOT NUMBER 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION 

CC29440 

08/15102 

08115100 

2000 psig 

RSTU327553 

398n3 

.. 

This calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability ProtocoJ, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. 

All Values certified to be +/-1% NJSTTraceable. 

Type LOT ID 

NTRM 81662 98060313 

lnstrumenUMake/Model 

NicoleV550/AD19603531 

Page: 1 Of 1 

BG 416A (7/99) 

Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. I.e. 1.0 Megapascal 

CALIBRATION SfANDARDS USED IN ASSAY 

Cylinder No Concentration Expiration 

XC005113B 997 +/- 9 ppm S02/N2 06103/01 

ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY 

Analytical Principle 

FTIR 

121 QA Approved 

Last Multipoint 

Calibration 

07/19/00 

d-. j::." ·~