alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Polymer Group Inc.'s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         31,855
<SECURITIES>                                   12,677
<RECEIVABLES>                                  79,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,885
<INVENTORY>                                    61,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              199,091
<PP&E>                                        485,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 78,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                718,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          74,206
<BONDS>                                       390,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          320
<OTHER-SE>                                    199,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  718,494
<SALES>                                       260,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              260,455
<CGS>                                         193,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 193,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .34
        



</TABLE>
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) ) DOCKET OST-2007-0038 for renewal of exemption authority ) (Guadalajara-San Antonio) ) __________________________________________)

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.

February 1, 2013BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. ) ) DOCKET OST-2007-0038 for renewal of exemption authority ) February 1, 2013 (Guadalajara-San Antonio) ) __________________________________________)

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OF AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION

By application dated November 30, 2012, Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de

C.V. ("Aeromexico") requested renewa l of the above-captioned exemption

authority to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons,

property, and mail between Guadalajara, Mexico and San Antonio, Texas.

That request was included in an a pplication that aggregated renewal

applications from ten separate dockets.

Aeromexico respectfully amends that application to withdraw its

application for renewal of Guadalajara-San Antonio authority, leaving no

unexpired authority in Docket OST-2007-0038. (This is not intended to affect

Aeromexico’s pending renewal requests in the remaining nine dockets

referred to in the November 30 document.)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 186 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10944]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT

  A message from the President of the United States was communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Williams, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1343 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1343

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 
 as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 
      certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

 Mr. Hultgren (for himself, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Stivers, Ms. Sinema, Mr. 
Higgins of New York, and Mr. MacArthur) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 
 as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 
      certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Encouraging Employee Ownership Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED THRESHOLD FOR DISCLOSURES RELATING TO COMPENSATORY 
              BENEFIT PLANS.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise section 230.701(e) 
of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, so as to increase from 
$5,000,000 to $10,000,000 the aggregate sales price or amount of 
securities sold during any consecutive 12-month period in excess of 
which the issuer is required under such section to deliver an 
additional disclosure to investors. The Commission shall index for 
inflation such aggregate sales price or amount every 5 years to reflect 
the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 
published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rounding to the nearest 
$1,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136355 and Form S-8 No. 333-122609) pertaining to the Emtec, Inc 2006 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation  Plan and to the Emtec, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan of our report dated December 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Emtec, Inc. for year ended August 31, 2005, the period from April  17, 2004 to August 31, 2004 (Successor Period) and the period from September 1, 2003 to April 16, 2004 (Predecessor Period), included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPPhiladelphia, PANovember 28, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1211 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1211

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 N. Main Street, Encinal, Texas, as the ``Encinal Veterans Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENCINAL VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 400 N. Main Street, Encinal, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Encinal Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Encinal 
Veterans Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1211

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 N. Main Street, Encinal, Texas, as the ``Encinal Veterans Post 
                               Office''.
```
GO »

Skip navigation

Learn About Cancer

Find information and resources for a specific cancer topic

SELECT A CANCER TYPE

Learn about a specific type of cancer, its risk factors, early detection,

diagnosis, treatment and more.

Select a Cancer Type

See List View »

Learn More

Prostate Cancer Early Detection»

Learn about the tests used to try to find prostate cancer early and the issues you need to

think about before deciding whether to be tested.

Learn About Cancer Page 1 of 3

http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/index 6/28/2011
Skin Cancer Prevention and Early Detection»

Skin cancer is by far the most common type of cancer in the United States. Here you can

learn about the risk factors for skin cancer and what you can do to help protect yourself

and your loved ones.

Coping with Cancer After a Natural Disaster»

If you (or a loved one) have cancer and your treatment plan needs to change due to a

recent natural disaster, the following questions and answers may help you figure out what

you need to do to get your treatment back on schedule.

SELECT A CANCER TYPE

• Adrenal Cortical Cancer

• Advanced Cancer

• Anal Cancer

• Aplastic Anemia

• Bile Duct Cancer

• Bladder Cancer

• Bone Cancer

• Bone Metastasis

• Brain/CNS Tumors In Adults

• Brain/CNS Tumors In Children

• Breast Cancer

• Breast Cancer In Men

• Cancer in Children

• Cancer of Unknown Primary

• Castleman Disease

• Cervical Cancer

• Colon/Rectum Cancer

• Endometrial Cancer

• Esophagus Cancer

• Ewing Family Of Tumors

• Eye Cancer

• Gallbladder Cancer

Learn About Cancer Page 2 of 3

http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/index 6/28/2011
• Gastrointestinal Carcinoid Tumors

• Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

• Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

• Hodgkin Disease

• Kaposi Sarcoma

• Kidney Cancer

• Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer

• Leukemia - Acute Lymphocytic (ALL) in Adults

• Leukemia - Acute Myeloid (AML)

• Leukemia - Chronic Lymphocytic (CLL)

• Leukemia - Chronic Myeloid (CML)

• Leukemia - Chronic Myelomonocytic (CMML)

• Leukemia in Children

• Liver Cancer

• Lung Cancer - Non-Small Cell

• Lung Cancer - Small Cell

• Lung Carcinoid Tumor

• Lymphoma of the Skin

• Malignant Mesothelioma

• Multiple Myeloma

• Myelodysplastic Syndrome

• Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus Cancer

• Nasopharyngeal Cancer

• Neuroblastoma

• Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

• Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma In Children

• Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer

• Osteosarcoma

• Ovarian Cancer

• Pancreatic Cancer

• Penile Cancer

• Pituitary Tumors

• Prostate Cancer

• Retinoblastoma

• Rhabdomyosarcoma

• Salivary Gland Cancer

• Sarcoma - Adult Soft Tissue Cancer

• Skin Cancer - Basal and Squamous Cell

• Skin Cancer - Melanoma

• Small Intestine Cancer

• Stomach Cancer

• Testicular Cancer

• Thymus Cancer

• Thyroid Cancer

• Uterine Sarcoma

• Vaginal Cancer

• Vulvar Cancer

• Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

• Wilms Tumor

Learn About Cancer Page 3 of 3

http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/index 6/28/2011
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1261 

To clarify the definition of navigable waters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2017 

Mr. THORNBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To clarify the definition of navigable waters, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Regulatory 

5 Certainty for Water Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AGENCY REGULATIONS. 

7 The final rule issued by the Administrator of the En8 vironmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the 

9 Army entitled ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘Waters 

10 of the United States’ ’’, signed by the Administrator and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1261 IH

1 the Assistant Secretary on May 27, 2015, shall have no 

2 force or effect. 

3 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS. 

4 Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

5 Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended by striking paragraph 

6 (7) and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(7) NAVIGABLE WATERS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘navigable 

9 waters’ means the waters of the United States, 

10 including the territorial seas, that are— 

11 ‘‘(i) navigable-in-fact; or 

12 ‘‘(ii) permanent or continuously flow13 ing bodies of water that form geographical 

14 features commonly known as streams, 

15 oceans, rivers, and lakes that are con16 nected to waters that are navigable-in-fact. 

17 ‘‘(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The term ‘navigable 

18 waters’ does not include— 

19 ‘‘(i) waters that do not physically abut 

20 waters described in subparagraph (A) 

21 through an actual and continuous surface 

22 water connection; 

23 ‘‘(ii) man-made or natural structures 

24 or channels through which water flows 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1261 IH

1 intermittently or ephemerally, including for 

2 the periodic drainage of rainfall; or 

3 ‘‘(iii) wetlands, including playa lakes, 

4 prairie potholes, wet meadows, wet prai5 ries, and vernal pools, that lack a contin6 uous surface water connection to bodies of 

7 water that are waters described in sub8 paragraph (A). 

9 ‘‘(C) NO AGGREGATION.—The aggregation 

10 of wetlands or waters shall not be used to de11 termine whether the wetlands or waters are 

12 navigable waters.’’. 

13 SEC. 4. COAST GUARD. 

14 Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this 

15 Act shall be construed to impair, diminish, or otherwise 

16 affect the authority, function, jurisdiction, or power of the 

17 Coast Guard, or any member thereof, with respect to the 

18 navigable waters of the United States, or to affect or alter 

19 the status of such waters as navigable waters of the 

20 United States for such purposes. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Establishing a “Habit of Environmental Security Dialogue”

By Justin PummellU.S. Army Corps of Engineers

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### Thoenes, Appellant, vs. Hamburg and wife, Respondents.

*October 11*

November 7, *1928.*

*210For the appellant there was a brief by *McFaricine &*Loomis, and oral argument by *I. A. McFarlane,*all of Mauston.

*Frank H. Hanson*of Mauston, for the’ respondents.

The following opinion was filed November 7, 1928:

Eschweiler, J.

Defendant, prior to his negotiations with the plaintiff, duly conveyed the two lots, 15 and 16, to Fred Krueger, and since then nothing appears to have been done as between Hamburg and Krueger to in any wise change the effect of such conveyance, and Krueger, after abandoning possession of lot 17 in 1920, has been in continuous possession of both lots 15 and 16. Part of lot 17 on the further side of the creek crossing it was at no time in the possession of Krueger claiming to own such part.

In 1915 defendant by written agreement promised to convey, with other property, this particular lot 17, and then executed his warranty deed also containing the identical description. These writings were made under his direction and the property specifically pointed out by defendant .to the scrivener from the map that plaintiff and defendant had used at the time of the negotiations and showing Krueger’s owhership of lots 16 and 15. Defendant admits that he did not intend to retain for himself any of the property north of Krueger’s at the time of his negotiations with plaintiff.

The effect of the decision by the trial court is to revest title in this lot 17, lying, as it does, between Krueger’s lot 16 and lot 18 concededly conveyed to plaintiff, back in defendant; it takes from plaintiff’s specified description what was evidently the most valuable, if not the largest as well, of the eight several parcels. If there was a mistake in the drafting of the land contract between the parties in 1915 it was clearly, and it is so stated in defendant’s own answer, the mistake of the scrivener, the-bank official who drew the writings at the time and under-’ defendant’s specific direction. - Defendant is in no position to assert such a mistake if mistake *211there was. He intended, as shown by his own admission, to convey, to plaintiff the property north of Krueger. Krueger is now asserting no claim to lot 17 and no title to property other than to lots 15 and 16 mentioned in the deed to him of 1912. If there was a mistake as to plaintiff’s description there must have been one in the prior conveyance to Krueger, but the latter now submits to an undisturbed possession of the two lots described in his deed. We can find nothing in the facts or in the law controlling such situations which warrants such a result, and the result is clearly inequitable.

It follows that the prayer of the counterclaim should have been denied and the plaintiff is entitled to his appropriate relief upon his complaint.

*By the Court.*— The part of the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to enter, judgment in accordance with this opinion.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on January 23, 1929.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of America’s Suppliers, Inc.
(the “Company”), for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Marc Joseph, President and acting principal executive officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
                  /s/Marc JosephMarc
      JosephPresidentAugust
      4, 2010
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

554 Bloomfield LLC 

Under Contract No. DACA51-5-10-213 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 58819 

Ms. Wendy Bond 

Managing Member 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Lorraine C. Lee, Esq. 

District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, New York 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By order dated 7 January 2015, the Board dismissed this appeal without 

prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 18(b ). The order stated that unless either party or the 

Board acted to reinstate the appeal within one year, the dismissal would be deemed 

with prejudice. By letter dated 19 October 2015, appellant requested the dismissal 

without prejudice be continued through 31March2016. The government does not 

object to appellant's request. 

Accordingly, this appeal was reinstated to the Board's docket and is hereby 

dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Board Rule 18(b ). Unless either party or the 

Board acts to reinstate the appeal by 31 March 2016, the dismissal shall be deemed 

with prejudice. 

Dated: 12 November 2015 

»c~wO<df4_;{- - rMARKN. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58819, Appeal of 

554 Bloomfield LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 69318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28922]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7680]

In the Matter of the Designation of Shamil Salmanovich Basayev as 
a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Shamil Salmanovich Basayev no longer meets the 
criteria for designation under the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke 
the designation of the aforementioned individual as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 24, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-28922 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
OMB Control No. 2070-0054; EPA ICR No. 0586.12

Attachment F

Dioxin/Furan Report (EPA Form 7710-51)

Available electronically in Portable Document Format at 

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pubs/7710.51.pdf