alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1346 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  Union Calendar No. 49
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1346

                          [Report No. 115-85]

To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
    Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
         Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

   Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Minnesota, Ms. Esty, Mr. 
  Hultgren, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Webster of 
    Florida, Mr. Nolan, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Costa, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. 
   Quigley, and Mr. Denham) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             April 6, 2017

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Barletta, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Dent, Mr. Ryan of 
 Ohio, Mr. Sires, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Trott, Mr. Mast, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Schneider, 
       Ms. Frankel of Florida, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. Emmer

                             April 6, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
    Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
         Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    The rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform'' (81 Fed. Reg. 
93448 (December 20, 2016)) shall have no force or effect, and any 
regulation revised by that rule shall be applied as if that rule had 
not been issued.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 49

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1346

                          [Report No. 115-85]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the 
    Federal Transit Administration entitled ``Metropolitan Planning 
         Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 6, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1257 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1257

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the Securities 
  Exchange Commission to refund or credit excess payments made to the 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2017

Mr. Meeks (for himself and Mr. Hultgren) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the Securities 
  Exchange Commission to refund or credit excess payments made to the 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securities and Exchange Commission 
Overpayment Credit Act''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDING OR CREDITING OVERPAYMENT OF SECTION 31 FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 31 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78ee) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Overpayment.--If a national securities exchange or national 
securities association pays to the Commission an amount in excess of 
fees and assessments due under this section and informs the Commission 
of such amount paid in excess within 10 years of the date of the 
payment, the Commission shall offset future fees and assessments due by 
such exchange or association in an amount equal to such excess 
amount.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to any fees and assessments paid before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Royal Malaysian Navy Fires First Missile at Sea

By Petty Officer 3rd Class Kylie Jagiello Commander, U.S. 3rd Fleet

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1268 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1268

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2017

 Mr. Smith of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Schrader, Mr. Yoho, 
  Mr. Abraham, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Ms. Brownley of California, Ms. 
  DelBene, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Harper, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
  Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, and Mrs. Davis of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment 
Program Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'',
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        under section 1415A of the National Agricultural Research, 
        Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or 
        under any other State loan repayment or loan forgiveness 
        program that is intended to provide for increased access to 
        veterinary services in such State.'', and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of G/O International, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Jack L. Burns, President, Treasurer and director of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 8/11/05                               /s/Jack L. Burns
      -----------                            ----------------------
                                             Jack L. Burns
                                             President
                                             Treasurer
                                             Director
No. 91-6171.

#### Schillaci *v.*Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 91-6069.

#### Murphy *v.*Dowd et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Donates $510,000 in COVID-19 Relief Supplies 

U.S. Embassy in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Tonga, and Tuvalu

SUVA, U.S. Embassy in Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Tonga, and Tuvalu -- The United States Chargé d’Affaires Tony Greubel donated over FJ$510,000 (US$ 252,864) worth of locally-sourced COVID-19 relief supplies to the Government of Fiji at the Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Services building for the Ministry of Health.CDA Greubel said, “Fiji’s management and containment of COVID-19 has been and continues to be impressive. It is an honor to contribute to your effective management of the pandemic. I am pleased to donate locally-purchased equipment and supplies to support local businesses hit hard by this pandemic. The United States is happy to support the medical and security professionals keeping Fijians safe.”The donation consists of personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies including over 5,536 liters of Paradise Beverage manufactured hand sanitizer, 3,560 boxes of sanitizing wipes, 34,860 face masks, 2,015 surgical gowns, and 201,500 pairs of latex gloves. The donation also included 75 portable generators and 37 iPad Minis.These supplies will assist the Ministry of Health and the disciplined forces with setting up fever clinics and forward operating bases. All items were purchased locally to maximize the economic benefit to Fijian businesses. The donation was funded by the United States Indo-Pacific Com-mand’s Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid (OHDACA) program to help stop the spread of COVID-19.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
June 15, 2015

Mr. Shayn Mitchell

812 Palm Terrace Escondido, CA 92025

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2113), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Renaissance Guardsman: Aircrew Flight Equipment Keeps C-17 Aircrew Safe

By David Bedard176th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1194
In Re: CARL E. SNYDER, Debtor.

_________________________ ROY D. HANSEN MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARL E. SNYDER, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-4150-JFM, BK-91-44784) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jon Alexander Hoppe, HAFEY & HOPPE, L.L.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Carl E. Snyder, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2* Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 3 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by F ED . R. APP . P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by F ED . R. APP . P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under F ED . R. APP . P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by F ED . R. A PP . P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." * The district court entered its order on December 28, 1994; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on January 30, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny the Appellee's motion to submit the case on briefs as moot and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Ghanta, Venu To: Camobreco, Vincent Subject: FW: EO 12866 Comments on RFS Pathways 1 (RIN 2060-AR07) Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:33:44 AM

_____________________________________________ From: Simon, Karl Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 8:55 AM To: Whiteman, Chad Cc: Hengst, Benjamin; farber, glenn; hannon, john; Stewart, Lori; Jutras, Nathaniel; Argyropoulos, Paul; Lie, Sharyn; Ghanta, Venu Subject: Re: EO 12866 Comments on RFS Pathways 1 (RIN 2060-AR07) Chad, Per our discussion yesterday, here is the definition of energy cane that we will include in the rule. This would go in the definitions section of the regulations, and then any reference in the preamble or other parts of the regulations would be tied to this definition. The table 1 reference would be to "energy cane" as defined.
Karl

Energy cane means a complex hybrid in the Saccharum genus that has been bred to maximize cellulosic rather than sugar content. For the purposes of this section, energy cane excludes the species Saccharum spontaneum, but includes hybrids derived from S. spontaneum that have been developed and publicly released by USDA

.

From: "Whiteman, Chad" < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >
To: Venu Ghanta/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc: Benjamin Hengst/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Glenn Farber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karl Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lori Stewart/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Argyropoulos/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharyn Lie/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 02/08/2013 01:21 PM Subject: EO 12866 Comments on RFS Pathways 1 (RIN 2060-AR07) 

### Venu,

Attached are EO 12866 comments, highlighted in green and labeled 2/8/2013, on the noninvasive biomass pathways of the Pathways 1 rule. Regards, Chad[attachment "EO12866_New Fuel Pathways Rule under RFS2 2060-AR07 FRM FRN_2_8_2013 - comments on non-invasive pathways.docx" deleted by Karl Simon/DC/USEPA/US]
February 2009 and March 2009, no CEMS data

Nitric Acid Plant was off-line for the entire two month period.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

In connectionwith this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mission Community Bancorp (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Anita M. Robinson,President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       ThisForm 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 28, 2003 |                                  |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            |                                  |
| By:                             | /s/ Anita M. Robinson                 |
|                            | Anita M. Robinson                     |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Memorandum to File**

**Subject:** Communications between EPA and Lhoist o n BART FIP for Nelson Lime Plant in Yavapai County, , Arizona

**From:** Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division

**To:** File

**Date:** June 13, 2014
**Participants** :
**Lhoist :**  Edward Barry , Western Environmental Manager, Lhoist

Herb ert Verville, Environmental Manager, Lhoist
Eric Hiser, Attorney

Mark Johnson
Grant McCullough

Jason Graham

**EPA:** Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director , Air Division

Eugene Chen, Engineer , Permits Office

Tho mas Webb, Project Lead, Planning Office
Charlotte Withey, Attorney

- Advisor, Office of Regional Coun sel

**Summary:** Lhoist and EPA had multiple communications to clarify the operation of the facility, to understand the impact of startup and shutdown on facility emissions and to identify information that could be made public in light of the Confidential Business Information (CBI) claim made by Lhoist.

**Materials:** 4/28/14 email with four attachments (two CBI attachments removed )

5/9/14 letter from Lhoist to EPA
6/3/14 em ail with summary data**Phone calls:** 4/10/14 phone call between Ed Barry, Lhoist, and Colleen McKaughan, EPA
5/2/14 call to discuss materials in 4/28/14 email
5/7/14 call between EPA and Lhoist to continue 5/ 2/14 discussion 6/4/13 call between Ed Barry and Herbert Verville, Lhoist, and Colleen
McKaughan, EPA