alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08-0279-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JANUARY 12, 2009

	______________________________

	TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

										Appellant

	V.

	GOETZ INSURORS, INC. AND

	GOETZ INSURORS, INC., AS ASSIGNEE

	OF THE CLAIMS OF CATTLECO, INC.,

										Appellees

	______________________________

	FROM THE 64th DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

	NO. A-10810-05-11; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Appellant Texas Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the final judgment of the trial court.  On August 11, 2008, the clerk’s record was filed.  The reporter’s record was due on October 15, 2008.  No extension motion or reporter’s record was filed.  On October 22, 2008, this court directed the court reporter by letter “to advise the Court of the status of the reporter’s record on or before November 3, 2008."  In response, the Court received a motion for extension of time to file the record, which was granted to November 14, 2008.  No extension motion or record was filed by that date.  On December 1, 2008, the Court again notified the reporter that the record had not been filed and the reporter was asked to provide the status of the record by December 10, 2008.  On December 10, 2008, the reporter filed her second extension motion requesting until January 12, 2009, to file the record, which was granted.  On January 5, 2009, this Court received the court reporter’s third extension request asking for an additional thirty days to file the record.

	Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 64th District Court of Swisher County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine:

		when the reporter’s record can reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of their right to appeal.

	The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before February 11, 2009.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before February 11, 2009.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-3993 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-065-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 3.0 $ 255.00 $ 255.00 152 $38,760.00

Conditional -

Replacement 23.0 $1,955.0

0

$590,000 $591,955.00 152 $89,977,160.

00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $90,015,920

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM LUTHER YOUNG, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR96-393-DKC)

Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James K. Bredar, Federal Public Defender, Beth M. Faber, Chief

Assistant Federal Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.

Lynne A. Battagalia, United States Attorney, Deborah A. Johnston,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

William Luther Young, Jr. appeals his conviction and sentence

for interstate travel with intent to engage in a sex act with minor

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) (1994). Appellant contends that

the statute: (1) exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce

Clause; (2) is unconstitutionally vague; (3) impinges upon constitutionally protected behavior; and (4) does not require the necessary overt act.

Appellant, who was residing in Pennsylvania, established

contact through the Internet with a 12-year old Maryland girl. He

traveled to Maryland to meet her, at which time he had sexual

contact with her. He traveled again to Maryland to meet her and was

arrested. The Appellant moved to dismiss the indictment, raising

the same issues raised in the instant appeal. The district court

denied the motion. The Appellant then pled guilty and was sentenced

to 12 months' imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

We affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence on the reasoning

of the district court as expressed in its comprehensive memorandum

opinion denying Appellant's motion to dismiss the indictment.

United States v. Young, No. 96-CR-393 (D. Md. Feb. 18, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
4

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 137

  To amend title 11 of the United States Code to stop abusive student 
             loan collection practices in bankruptcy cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

   Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 11 of the United States Code to stop abusive student 
             loan collection practices in bankruptcy cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Abusive Student Loan 
Collection Practices in Bankruptcy Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 523(d) of title 11 of the United States Code is amended by 
striking ``of this section'' and inserting ``or the debtor requests a 
determination of the dischargeability of a debt based on undue hardship 
under subsection (a)(8)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this Act shall 
apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the United 
States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 176 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E2261]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  A TRIBUTE TO MRS. MARGARET WILLIAMS

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. WM. LACY CLAY

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2008

  Mr. CLAY. Madam Speaker, I rise today to honor Mrs. Margaret 
Williams, The Missouri Teacher of the Year 2008-2009 Recipient. The 
Missouri Teacher of the Year is a prestigious honors program that 
focuses public attention on excellence in teaching. Williams, a 37 year 
educator has earned the respect and admiration of students, parents, 
and colleagues alike. She inspires students of all backgrounds and 
abilities to learn. For the aforementioned reasons, I enthusiastically 
honor Mrs. Williams today before Congress.
  Mrs. Williams is a graduate of Beaumont High School in St. Louis, 
Missouri. She was inspired by her psychology teacher Mr. Brown to 
pursue a career in education. Mrs. Williams went on to graduate from 
the University of Missouri--St. Louis.
  Mrs. Williams is the social studies department chair for University 
City High School in University City, Missouri where she has been 
teaching for the last 18 years. Williams who also teaches history, 
government, and an African-American experience course was one of six 
finalists to compete in this year's competition.
  The Missouri Teacher of the Year program is conducted annually by the 
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, in conjunction with 
the National Teacher of the Year program. Major funding for Missouri's 
program is provided by The Boeing Company, St. Louis, Missouri.
  Before joining University City, Williams began her illustrious career 
in education as principal and administrator from 1986 to 1990 at West 
Side Christian Academy in St. Louis. After which she taught at the 
Visual and Performing Arts High School and Beaumont from 1971 to 1986.
  Williams is the first in the University City School District to be 
named Missouri Teacher of the year and was honored with a special drum 
line presentation, and video made by the district as part of her 
nomination package.
  Madam Speaker, Mrs. Williams has my absolute highest recommendation 
to be honored today. Her contributions to education and unyielding 
commitment to the youth of Missouri is unmatched. As a pioneer in the 
University City Schools and a role model to all educators that is 
worthy of recognition. I urge my colleagues to join me in honoring Mrs. 
Margaret Williams for being a top Missouri educator and being named the 
Missouri Teacher of the Year 2008-2009.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           5,576
<SECURITIES>                                   162,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                       291
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,590
<PP&E>                                          27,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       211,594
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       74
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,444
<DISCONTINUED>                                     374
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1214 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency to conduct a program to use simplified procedures to issue public assistance for certain 

projects under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

and Emergency Assistance Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1214 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Simplified 

3 Assistance Value Enhancement Act’’ or the ‘‘Disaster 

4 SAVE Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE PROGRAM. 

6 (a) THRESHOLD.—The Administrator of the Federal 

7 Emergency Management Agency shall immediately estab8 lish the threshold for eligibility pursuant to section 

9 422(b)(2) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

10 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5189(b)(2)) at 

11 $500,000. 

12 (b) REPORT.—Not later than May 1, 2021, the Ad13 ministrator shall submit to the Committee on Transpor14 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 

15 and the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern16 mental Affairs of the Senate a report containing the re17 sults of a comprehensive review of the program conducted 

18 under section 422 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re19 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5189), as 

20 modified by this section, to include an assessment of cost21 effectiveness, speed of recovery, capacity of the grantees, 

22 past performance, and accountability measures. 
3 

•HR 1214 EH

1 (c) SUNSET.—This Act shall expire on September 30, 

2 2021. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 27, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1214 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emerance Act, and for other purposes. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist- sistance for certain projects under the Robert T. to use simplified procedures to issue public as- gency Management Agency to conduct a program
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S385-S386]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGES FROM THE HOUSE

                                 ______
                                 

                    ENROLLED JOINT RESOLUTION SIGNED

  At 9:33 a.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by

[[Page S386]]

Mr. Zapata, one of its reading clerks, announced that the Speaker has 
signed the following enrolled joint resolution:

       S.J. Res. 3. Joint resolution ensuring that the 
     compensation and other emoluments attached to the office of 
     Secretary of the Interior are those which were in effect on 
     January 1, 2005.

  The enrolled joint resolution was subsequently signed by the 
President pro tempore (Mr. Byrd).
                                  ____

  At 3:10 p.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Ms. Cole, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
passed the following bill, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       H.R. 2. An act to amend title XXI of the Social Security 
     Act to extend and improve the Children's Health Insurance 
     Program, and for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00734

- CV

Michael A. SALAZAR, Appellant

v.

HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP and Wal

- Mart #1198,

App ellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 11032 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. We order appellant’s

brief due June 1, 2017

. No further extensions will be granted . If the brief is not filed by the date ordered, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice.

Appellant also asserts there are errors in the reporter’s record and asks that we order the reporter to turn over to the court her “recordings or original transcr ipts.” We deny the motion. If appellant believes there are material inaccuracies in the reporter’s record that require correction, he may bring them to this court’s attention by separate motion or by a supplement to his brief. Each alleged inaccuracy mu st be identified by page and line number, quoting the text in the record, and stating what appellant believes the accurate text should be.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of May, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal and Harbor Co. v. John Leatham et al.

1. *Statutes—Construction*of.—A law providing that the directors of a ship canal and harbor may regulate tolls upon all boats, vessels, steamboats and other craft, used in the transportation of freight and passengers upon such canal, does not authorize a charge of tolls on steam tugs used only for towing purposes.

*2. Same—Qualifying*Words.—In a charter of a harbor and canal company, authorizing the charging of tolls upon all water craft used in the transportation of freight and passengers, it was held that the qualifying words do not mean that such craft shall be used for the transportation of both freight and passengers, but for either.

Assumpsit, for tolls, etc.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook *Comity;*the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 11, 1896.

Schuyler & Kremer, and Herrick, Allen & Boyesen, attorneys for appellant.

E. A. Sherburne, counsel for appellees.

*Mr.*Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

No statement of facts is necessary in this case, as the single question is, whether section eight of the charter of the company authorizes it to charge tolls on steam tugs passing through the canal.

The words to be considered are: *“*The directors shall .have power to regulate tolls and charges upon all boats, *387vessels, steamboats and other craft used for the transportation of freight and passengers on and along the canal of said company, and for the use of any steam tugs owned by said company.”

*No*multiplication of words can make clearer than it is on the face of the sentence, that the words “ used for the transportation of freight and passengers,” apply to and 'qualify the words “ boats, vessels, steamboats, and other craft.”

A somewhat similar question was’ in Rice v. Tolman Co., 60 Ill. App. 516, and a like decision made, citing John A. Tolman Co. v. McClure, 10 Ind. App. 28.

The qualifying words do not mean that the boats, etc., shall be used for the transportation of both freight and passengers, but for either. “ And ” is often used interchangeably with “ or,” the meaning being determined by the context. 1 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 569.

The court below held that tugs not used for transportation of anything, but only for towing, were not required to pay tolls.

In this we concur, and the judgment is affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USNS Salvor, MDSU Divers Team Up with DPAA to Recover WWII Pilot's Remains Near Palau

By Grady T. Fontana CommanderTask Force 73 Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News