alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Benjamin H. BENNETT, Jr., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-10184-BKC-SMW.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Oct. 29, 1981.

Reggie David Sanger, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for creditor.

Richard Smith, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for debtor.

ORDER

' SIDNEY M. WEAVER, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER having come before this Court on the creditor, NATALIE BLOCK’S Objection to Exemptions, and after considering the evidence introduced, the testimony of the witnesses, and the demeanor and credibility of the witnesses, this Court finds as follows:

1. The debtor, BENJAMIN H. BENNETT, JR., filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy on July 15, 1981.

2. At that time, the debtor, while being obligated to provide support to his two minor children pursuant to a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, had failed to make the payments on a regular basis and had accumulated an arrears of $4,551.00.

3. The debtor nevertheless claimed his exemption under Article X Section 4 of the Florida Constitution on the basis that he was the head of the family by providing the principal means of support for his mother, with whom he presently resides.

4. The debtor testified that he paid his mother approximately $500.00 per month, out of this sum she paid a car payment of $220.46 on a 1981 Thunderbird, which the debtor exclusively uses. Also, the debtor’s mother pays from the remaining sum the following expenses for the debtor’s benefit:

> (a) Auto insurance $227.50 bi-annually

> (b) Cable T.V. $ 34.00 per month

> (c) Extra electricity $ 50.00 per month

> (d) Extra food $100.00 per month

5. After considering the payments made specifically for the benefit of the debtor, by virtue *of*his residing with his mother, there remains $57.62 on a monthly basis to defer the remaining household expenses of both the debtor and his mother.

6. The debtor's mother has her own income from social security which totals $288.00 per month. This covers her normal monthly expenses.

7. With these facts considered and the fact that the debtor had previously testified that he considered the amount paid to his mother, over and above the monies necessary for the maintenance of the automobile, as rent, it is hereby

ORDERED that the debtor does not qualify as head of a family under Article X Section 4 of the Florida Constitution and the objections claimed by him shall be disallowed with the property or its value to be turned over to the trustee of this estate for liquidation.
J-A08010-22

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

ADOPTION OF: Z.K.S.I., U.Z.M.I., 

AND E.K.I., JR.

APPEAL OF: B.S., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1114 WDA 2021

Appeal from the Decree Entered August 27, 2021

In the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County Orphans' Court at 

No(s): No. 2020-720 IVT, 

No. 2020-721 IVT, No. 2020-722 IVT

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and McCAFFERY, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY McCAFFERY, J.: FILED: May 3, 2022

While I agree that we are bound by Commonwealth v. Walker, 185

A.3d 969 (Pa. 2018), and its progeny, I write to express my concern about

the ramifications of this line of case law which results in quashal, or waiver,

situations like the outcome of this case. Counsel’s inaction effectively

amounted to an abandonment of Appellant at a crucial stage in appellate

proceedings, wherein counsel: (1) did not request a correction in order to

perfect the appeal; (2) did not respond to this Court’s rule to show cause

which pointed out the problem; and (3) did not address the issue in the

appellate brief. Due to counsel’s inaction, Appellant has no legal recourse in

a consequential life-altering decision, in which her parental rights to her three

children are irrevocably terminated.
J-A08010-22

- 2 -

President Judge Emeritus Bender Joins this Concurring Statement.

Judge Lazarus Joins this Concurring Statement.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Senate Confirms Dunford for Additional 2-Year Term as Chairman

By Jim GaramoneDoD News, Defense Media Activity

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### In re Frank GREEN, Jo Ann Green, Debtors. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOUISVILLE, Plaintiff, v. Frank GREEN, Jo Ann Green, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 3800345.

Adv. No. 3800157.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W. D. Kentucky.

Sept. 16, 1981.

David T. Stosberg, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff.

John W. Fleck, Louisville, Ky., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The winter of 1979-80 was a dismal season indeed for Frank Green. Already providing for a resident granddaughter’s food, clothing and tuition, the Green family was called upon in November, 1979, to provide also for their son, who had been laid off his construction job at the Marble Hill power plant site. The grocery bill doubled.

In December, Green was laid off *his*construction job near Owensboro. He sought and obtained a subcontracting job with Sears, an engagement of short duration because of a mismatch between Sears’ job requirements and Green’s job skills.

Throughout this period, Green was looking for his salvation to the profitable disposition of two commercial properties, six tract homes and 40 acres zoned for development. The properties had a combined market value of $534,000. Green hoped to realize a total profit of about $100,000. All were sold at foreclosure in December or January. Green had prided himself on having built 130 homes and survived the real estate market collapse of 1974 without a single foreclosure.

During this time of travail, Green and/or his wife incurred First National Bank Mast-ercharge debts in excess of his credit limit of $900. At the time the petition was filed, the total indebtedness was $2,210, most of which was incurred in December, 1979 and January, 1980. Green filed his bankruptcy petition with his wife in February. The next month this nondischargeability action was brought, alleging that the credit card transactions were accomplished with the fraudulent intent prohibited by Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The allegation is unconvincing. The record is absent any convincing proof of the reprehensible motive. It is rather convincing of a man’s effort to survive an unholy trinity of circumstances: (1) his son’s unemployment and resulting dependency by virtue of a power-plant shutdown; (2) his own unemployment, and (3) a loss of equity in speculative properties anticipating a housing need near a power-plant development which was postponed for two years.

The case generates a feeling not of mis-ereance, but rather of sympathy for a debt- or struggling against economic forces beyond his understanding or control. Based upon the depositions and testimony at trial, we would rather applaud the entrepreneuri*14al spirit of men such as this willing to take chances (at their potential profit and their creditors’) rather than to impute to them evil motives in the retrospective view of their failure.

Without any discernable proof of fraudulent motive, always an elusive state of mind to prove, we therefore ORDER that the indebtedness of Frank and Jo Ann Green to First National Bank of Louisville is dis-chargeable in bankruptcy. This is a final order.
No. 90-786.

#### Gray *v.*Indiana.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of FUSA Capital Corporation (the"Company"),
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  Report"),  I,  Jenifer  Osterwalder,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge,  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




/s/ Jenifer Osterwalder
-------------------
Jenifer Osterwalder
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: March 30, 2005
Order entered November 22, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00717-CV

JOE ERVIN LOCKRIDGE, Appellant

V.

STEPHANIE MARTIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-02578

ORDER

By letter filed November 18, 2021, appellant informs the Court that the copy 

of appellant’s motion for new trial included in the clerk’s record in this appeal is 

incomplete. The motion consisted of six pages, and only the first two pages are in 

the record. Appellant also notes the record omits any order on the new trial 

motion.

We construe appellant’s letter as a motion to supplement the clerk’s record. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to 
file, no later than November 29, 2021, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a 

complete copy of appellant’s six-page motion for new trial as well as a copy of any 

order on the motion. If no order exists, Ms. Pitre shall state so in writing. 

In light of the incomplete record, we RESET the deadline for the filing of 

appellant’s corrected brief to December 17, 2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre 

and the parties. We further DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to mail appellant a 

paper copy of the supplemental record upon its filing.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 94 Forces Squadron Rolls with 36th Airlift Squadron, 36th Contingency Response Support Squadron 

By Senior Airman Michael S. Murphy36th Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7000

ANTHONY MCQUEEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CLINTON E. FLOYD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-323-5-BR)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony McQueen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony McQueen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McQueen v. Floyd, No. CA-98-323-

5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21

AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

Subsidiaries of the Registrant





|                                      |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                            |  |  |  | State / Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                      |  | 
|A.G. (U.K.), Inc.                     |  |  |  | Ohio                                 
|AGC Funding Corporation               |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|AGC Holdings, Inc.                    |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|AGC, Inc.                             |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|A.G.C. Investments, Inc.              |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|A.G. Industries, Inc.                 |  |  |  | North Carolina                       
|AG Interactive, Inc.                  |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|Carlton Cards Limited                 |  |  |  | Canada                               
|Carlton Cards Limited                 |  |  |  | United Kingdom                       
|Carlton Cards Retail, Inc.            |  |  |  | Connecticut                          
|Cloudco, Inc.                         |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|Gibson Hanson Graphics Ltd.           |  |  |  | United Kingdom                       
|John Sands (Australia) Ltd.           |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|John Sands (N.Z.) Ltd.                |  |  |  | Delaware                             
|Plus Mark, Inc.                       |  |  |  | Ohio                                 
|Those Characters From Cleveland, Inc. |  |  |  | Ohio                                 
|UK Greetings Limited                  |  |  |  | United Kingdom
EXHIBIT  32.2



     CERTIFICATION  OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Jean  Wilson,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  of  XA,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
presents  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations  of  XA,  Inc.

                   By:/s/  Jean  Wilson
                   --------------------------
                   Name:  Jean  Wilson
                   Title:  Principal  Financial  Officer

March 24,  2006

<PAGE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Rushmore, 13th MEU Strengthen Partnerships in Sri Lanka

By Amphibious Squadron 1

                COLOMBO, Sri Lanka  –              
 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1207 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 334
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1207

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 15, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, with an amendment
                     [Omit the part struck through]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 306 River Street in Tilden, Texas, as the ``Tilden Veterans Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST TILDEN VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 306 River Street in Tilden, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tilden Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tilden 
Veterans Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 334

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1207

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 306 River Street in Tilden, Texas, as the ``Tilden Veterans Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2018

                       Reported with an amendment
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7602

CURTIS LEE MAYFIELD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; P. A.

TERRANGI, Warden; M. PORCHER, Therapeutic

Community Director; L. CORNERS, Assistant

Warden of Programs; J. JONES, Clinical Social

Worker; S. SNYDER, Clinical Social Worker; J.

LEWIS, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-1773-AM)

Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lee Mayfield, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Lee Mayfield appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

Mayfield was a prisoner in the Therapeutic Community at the Indian

Creek Correctional Center (“ICCC”). As the district court noted,

Mayfield is no longer a prisoner in that facility; consequently,

his claim for injunctive relief is moot. Mayfield v. Fleming, No.

CA-00-1773-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2001). Further, the district

court correctly concluded that Mayfield’s claim for money damages

is barred because he can show no physical injury. 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1997e(e) (West Supp. 2001). Accordingly, the district court

properly granted summary judgment against Mayfield. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 91-6172.

#### Flor *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.