# Official Journal C 235/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5929 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5929 June 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 235/01 | Commission Recommendation of 28 June 2016 on the monitoring of the presence of nickel in feed (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Commission

2016/C 235/01

Commission Recommendation of 28 June 2016 on the monitoring of the presence of nickel in feed (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 235/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7849 — Mol Hungarian Oil and Gas/Eni Hungaria/Eni Slovenija) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2016/C 235/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8064 — Bain Capital/Vista/Vertafore) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2016/C 235/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group) (
  1
  ) | 4 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 235/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7849 — Mol Hungarian Oil and Gas/Eni Hungaria/Eni Slovenija) (
  1
  )

1

3

2016/C 235/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8064 — Bain Capital/Vista/Vertafore) (
  1
  )

1

3

2016/C 235/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group) (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 235/05 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2016/C 235/06 | Special Report No 11/2016 — Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 235/05

Euro exchange rates

5

Court of Auditors

2016/C 235/06

Special Report No 11/2016 — Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 235/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7927 — EPH/Enel/SE) (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2016/C 235/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8100 — IK/Five Arrows/I@D) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 235/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7927 — EPH/Enel/SE) (
  1
  )

1

7

2016/C 235/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8100 — IK/Five Arrows/I@D) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Commission

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

of 28 June 2016

on the monitoring of the presence of nickel in feed

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/01)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The presence of nickel (Ni) in feed can arise from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Additionally, certain feed materials contain metallic nickel, since it is used as a catalyst in their production. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The presence of nickel (Ni) in feed can arise from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Additionally, certain feed materials contain metallic nickel, since it is used as a catalyst in their production.

| (2) | The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) has provided a scientific opinion on the risks to animal and public health and the environment to the presence of Ni in feed (1). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) has provided a scientific opinion on the risks to animal and public health and the environment to the presence of Ni in feed (1).

| (3) | The CONTAM Panel concluded that any adverse impact of Ni via feed to cattle, pigs, rabbits, ducks, fish, dogs, chickens, horses, sheep, goats and cats is unlikely. Concerning the assessment of human health risks from the presence of Ni in food of animal origin, the CONTAM Panel concluded that in the average population the current levels of chronic exposure to Ni, considering only foods of animal origin, might be of potential concern in the young population. Regarding acute dietary exposure, the CONTAM Panel concluded that nickel-sensitized individuals are also at risk of developing eczematous flare-up skin reactions through the consumption of food of animal origin. The contribution of food of animal origin to human dietary exposure to Ni should therefore not be underestimated, particularly in age classes with high dietary exposure to Ni. However from the available data it was not possible to determine carry-over rates from feed to food of animal origin. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The CONTAM Panel concluded that any adverse impact of Ni via feed to cattle, pigs, rabbits, ducks, fish, dogs, chickens, horses, sheep, goats and cats is unlikely. Concerning the assessment of human health risks from the presence of Ni in food of animal origin, the CONTAM Panel concluded that in the average population the current levels of chronic exposure to Ni, considering only foods of animal origin, might be of potential concern in the young population. Regarding acute dietary exposure, the CONTAM Panel concluded that nickel-sensitized individuals are also at risk of developing eczematous flare-up skin reactions through the consumption of food of animal origin. The contribution of food of animal origin to human dietary exposure to Ni should therefore not be underestimated, particularly in age classes with high dietary exposure to Ni. However from the available data it was not possible to determine carry-over rates from feed to food of animal origin.

| (4) | It is observed that the occurrence data on Ni in feed used in the EFSA scientific opinion were mainly originating from one Member State and are therefore not necessarily representative for the presence of Ni in feed in the EU. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

It is observed that the occurrence data on Ni in feed used in the EFSA scientific opinion were mainly originating from one Member State and are therefore not necessarily representative for the presence of Ni in feed in the EU.

| (5) | It is therefore appropriate to monitor the presence of Ni in feed across the EU before considering the setting of maximum levels of Ni in feed or any other risk management measures needed to ensure a high level of animal and human health protection, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

It is therefore appropriate to monitor the presence of Ni in feed across the EU before considering the setting of maximum levels of Ni in feed or any other risk management measures needed to ensure a high level of animal and human health protection,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

| (1) | Member States should, with the active involvement of feed business operators, perform monitoring for the presence of Ni in feed. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States should, with the active involvement of feed business operators, perform monitoring for the presence of Ni in feed.

| (2) | In order to ensure that the samples are representative for the sampled lot, Member States should follow the sampling procedure laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In order to ensure that the samples are representative for the sampled lot, Member States should follow the sampling procedure laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 (2).

| (3) | Member States should ensure that the analytical results are provided on a regular basis and at the latest by 31 October 2017 to EFSA in the EFSA data submission format in line with the requirements of EFSA’s Guidance on Standard Sample Description (SSD) for Food and Feed (3) and the additional EFSA’s specific reporting requirements. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Member States should ensure that the analytical results are provided on a regular basis and at the latest by 31 October 2017 to EFSA in the EFSA data submission format in line with the requirements of EFSA’s Guidance on Standard Sample Description (SSD) for Food and Feed (3) and the additional EFSA’s specific reporting requirements.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2016.

For the Commission

Vytenis ANDRIUKAITIS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  EFSA CONTAM Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain), 2015. Scientific Opinion on the risks to animal and public health and the environment related to the presence of nickel in feed. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4074, 76 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4074 www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (OJ L 54, 26.2.2009, p. 1).

2

(3)  http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/datex/datexsubmitdata.htm

3

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7849 — Mol Hungarian Oil and Gas/Eni Hungaria/Eni Slovenija)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/02)

On 7 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7849. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7849. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8064 — Bain Capital/Vista/Vertafore)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/03)

On 20 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8064. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8064. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/04)

On 21 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8057. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8057. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2016

(2016/C 235/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1073 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4425 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0845 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,108 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 317,67 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4413 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5247 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2201 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4984 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4438 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5925 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5671 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5006 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 294,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8831 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3606 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 595,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5077 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,150 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,6883 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,062 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7183 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9827 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,2070 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1073

JPY

Japanese yen

113,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4425

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0845

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,108

HUF

Hungarian forint

317,67

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4413

RON

Romanian leu

4,5247

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2201

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4984

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4438

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5925

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5671

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5006

KRW

South Korean won

1 294,19

ZAR

South African rand

16,8831

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3606

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 595,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5077

PHP

Philippine peso

52,150

RUB

Russian rouble

71,6883

THB

Thai baht

39,062

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7183

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9827

INR

Indian rupee

75,2070

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

Court of Auditors

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/6

---

Special Report No 11/2016

‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’

(2016/C 235/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2016 ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---

V Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.7927 — EPH/Enel/SE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/07)

| 1. | On 20 June 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Energetický a průmyslový holding, a.s. (‘EPH’, Czech Republic) and Enel SpA (‘Enel’, Italy) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Slovenske elektrarne, a.s. (‘SE’, Slovakia), by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 20 June 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Energetický a průmyslový holding, a.s. (‘EPH’, Czech Republic) and Enel SpA (‘Enel’, Italy) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Slovenske elektrarne, a.s. (‘SE’, Slovakia), by way of purchase of shares.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | SE is active in electricity generation, wholesale and retail supply of electricity, as well as balancing and ancillary services in Slovakia. SE is currently solely controlled by Enel, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

SE is active in electricity generation, wholesale and retail supply of electricity, as well as balancing and ancillary services in Slovakia. SE is currently solely controlled by Enel,

| — | Enel is a global player, active in electricity and gas generation, distribution and supply, |
| --- | --- |

—

Enel is a global player, active in electricity and gas generation, distribution and supply,

| — | EPH is a vertically integrated utility company engaged in coal extraction, electricity and heat production, distribution and supply as well as gas transmission, distribution, storage and supply. |
| --- | --- |

—

EPH is a vertically integrated utility company engaged in coal extraction, electricity and heat production, distribution and supply as well as gas transmission, distribution, storage and supply.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7927 — EPH/Enel/SE, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7927 — EPH/Enel/SE, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.8100 — IK/Five Arrows/I@D)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/08)

| 1. | On 21 June 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking(s) IK VII Limited (‘IK’, United Kingdom) belonging to the IK Investment Partners group and Five Arrows Managers (‘Five Arrows’, France) controlled by Rothschild & Co. acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of I@D Holding and its subsidiaries (‘I@D’, France), by way of purchase of shares through investment funds they manage and/or advise and related acquisition vehicles. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 21 June 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking(s) IK VII Limited (‘IK’, United Kingdom) belonging to the IK Investment Partners group and Five Arrows Managers (‘Five Arrows’, France) controlled by Rothschild & Co. acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of I@D Holding and its subsidiaries (‘I@D’, France), by way of purchase of shares through investment funds they manage and/or advise and related acquisition vehicles.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
  —   for IK: portfolio management activities on behalf of third parties,
  —   for Five Arrows: portfolio management activities on behalf of third parties,
  —   for I@D: real estate platform. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for IK: portfolio management activities on behalf of third parties,

—   for Five Arrows: portfolio management activities on behalf of third parties,

—   for I@D: real estate platform.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in this Notice.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8100 — IK/Five Arrows/I@D, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.8100 — IK/Five Arrows/I@D, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

---