93656 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2024 / Notices 

change the title from ‘Records of 

Acquisition and Disposition, Registered 

Importers of Arms, Ammunition & 

Implements of War on the U.S. 

Munitions Import List’ to ‘Records of 

Acquisition and Disposition, Registered 

Importers of Arms, Ammunition & 

Defense Articles on the U.S. Munitions 

Import List’ to reflect a change in 

terminology. 

5. Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. 

The statutory requirements are 

implemented in per aw 22 U.S.C. 2778 

and regulations 27 CFR 447.54. 

6. Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 50 respondents. 

7. Estimated Time per Respondent: 5 

hours. 

8. Frequency: Once annually. 

9. Total Estimated Annual Time 

Burden: 250 hours. 

10. Total Estimated Annual Other 

Costs Burden: $0. 

If additional information is required, 

contact: Darwin Arceo, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street 

NE, 4W–218 Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: November 22, 2024. 

Darwin Arceo, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2024–27820 Filed 11–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[CPCLO Order No. 007–2024 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, 

United States Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of a new system of 

records. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 

1974, Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Circular No. A–108, and Federal 

law, notice is hereby given that the 

DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) 

proposes a new system of records notice 

titled the Peer Review Management 

System (PRMS), JUSTICE/OJP–020. The 

DOJ uses the PRMS, a web-based tool, 

to manage the planning, selection, and 

assignment of peer reviewers as part of 

the merit review of DOJ’s funding 

opportunities. 

DATES: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552a(e)(4) and (11), this system of 

records is effective upon publication, 

subject to a 30-day period in which to 

comment on the routine uses described 

below. Please submit any comments by 

December 27, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: The public, OMB, and 

Congress are invited to submit any 

comments by mail to the United States 

Department of Justice, Office of Privacy 

and Civil Liberties, ATTN: Privacy 

Analyst, 145 N St. NE, Suite 8W, 

Washington, DC 20002; by facsimile at 

202–307–0693; or by email at 

privacy.compliance@usdoj.gov. To 

ensure proper handling, please 

reference the above CPCLO Order No. 

on your correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryce Mitchell, Division Director; 

Enterprise Application Development 

Division, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, Office of Justice Programs; 999 

North Capitol Street NE, Washington, 

DC 20002, Bryce.Mitchell@usdoj.gov, 

(202) 598–9418. 

Jennifer Tyson, Deputy Director, 

Grants Management Division, Audit, 

Assessment, and Management, Office of 

Justice Programs; 999 North Capitol 

Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, 

Jennifer.Tyson@usdoj.gov, (202) 307– 

0750. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Potential peer reviewers, who may be 

members of the public or Federal 

Government personnel, use the PRMS 

online tool to enter their records via 

enrollment applications (i.e., profiles) to 

be considered for peer review 

assignments. Authorized DOJ users (i.e. 

DOJ program office and contract staff) 

can search these profiles to nominate 

and invite a peer reviewer to review and 

score DOJ funding opportunity 

applications. Authorized users (i.e., 

those members of the public or Federal 

Government personnel invited by a DOJ 

program office staff to serve as peer 

reviewer) may log into PRMS to review 

their profiles and obtain access to 

assigned peer review tasks. 

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), 

the DOJ has provided a report to OMB 

and Congress on this new system of 

records. 

Dated: November 19, 2024 

Peter A. Winn, 

Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties 

Officer, United States Department of Justice. 

JUSTICE/OJP—020 

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER: \ 

Peer Review Management System 

(PRMS), JUSTICE/OJP—020 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: 

The system is unclassified. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Records in this system are maintained 

at the following locations: Office of 

Justice Programs (OJP); 999 North 

Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 

20002; and cloud service providers at 

AWS GovCloud; 1200 12th Avenue; 

South Seattle, WA 98144. The cloud 

computing service providers and their 

location may change from time to time, 

and this document may not reflect the 

most current information available. To 

confirm information about the current 

cloud computing service provider, 

please contact OJP through the OJP 

service desk at email address 

OJP.ITservicedesk@ojp.usdoj.gov. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S): 

Bryce Mitchell, Division Director, 

Enterprise Application Development 

Division, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, Office of Justice Programs, 999 

North Capitol Street NE, Washington, 

DC 20002, Bryce.Mitchell@usdoj.gov, 

(202) 514–2412. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

28 U.S.C. 530C, Authority to use 

available funds; 34 U.S.C. 10226(b), 

Personnel and Administrative Authority 

PURPOSE(S) OF THE SYSTEM: 

The Peer Review Management System 

(PRMS) supports DOJ’s overall 

grantmaking and research efforts toward 

fair, equitable, and objective funding 

decisions by providing a centralized 

directory for DOJ staff to obtain peer 

reviewers. DOJ peer reviewers consist of 

Federal Government staff or members of 

the public, who offer their expertise in 

merit reviewing and scoring OJP 

funding opportunities. The system 

achieves this purpose through its two 

main components, the Peer Reviewer 

Database (PRD) and the Peer Review 

Support System (PRSS). 

The PRD maintains and disseminates 

records of peer reviewers and potential 

peer reviewers, including their 

electronic enrollment information. This 

component collects records about 

potential peer reviewers who 

voluntarily complete a multi-step online 

application process to be assigned peer 

review as needed by DOJ. The PRD 

allows authorized DOJ users (DOJ 

program and contractor staff) to 

nominate and invite a potential peer 

reviewer for a peer review assignment. 

Authorized DOJ users can also review 

and evaluate work performed once a 

peer reviewer completes an assignment. 

The PRSS maintains details of the 

peer review process necessary for 

authorized DOJ users to manage the peer 

review process, including application 

review criteria from funding 

opportunities, application data, and 

peer reviewer assignments. The PRSS 

also converts raw peer review scores 

into normalized scores or tiers, which 

are uploaded into OJP’s grants 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2024 / Notices 93657 

management system for programmatic 

review. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Individuals applying to serve as peer 

reviewers and individuals selected by 

DOJ to serve as peer reviewers 

(including members of the public or 

Federal Government personnel); and 

DOJ personnel and DOJ contractors who 

have access to the system as permitted 

and authorized by the DOJ. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Records in the PRMS include an 

individual’s name, mailing address, 

personal email address, telephone 

number, work-related information (e.g., 

current occupation, job title, work 

address, email address, work address, 

and work history), areas of expertise, 

and information on any relevant lived 

justice-involved experience. In addition, 

information regarding potential peer 

reviewers’ education level, race, cultural 

or ethnic identity, education, sex or 

gender identity, Tribal affiliation, and 

former incarceration (as self-reported by 

the potential peer reviewers) may be 

provided. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

The records in the system may 

obtained from, among other sources, 

individuals applying to serve as peer 

reviewers, individuals selected by DOJ 

to serve as peer reviewers, and OJP’s 

grants management system, which 

provides grant application data. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

In addition to those disclosures 

generally permitted under 5 U.S.C. 

552a(b), all or a portion of the records 

contained in this system of records may 

be disclosed as a routine use pursuant 

to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) under the 

circumstances or for the purposes 

described below, to the extent such 

disclosures are compatible with the 

purposes for which the information was 

collected: 

1. Where a record, either alone or in 

conjunction with other information, 

may be relevant to investigating a 

violation or potential violation of law— 

criminal, civil, or regulatory in nature— 

the relevant records may be referred to 

the appropriate Federal, State, local, 

territorial, Tribal, or foreign law 

enforcement authority or other 

appropriate entity charged with the 

responsibility for investigating or 

prosecuting such violation or charged 

with enforcing or implementing such 

law. 

2. To appropriate officials and 

employees of a Federal agency or entity 

to the extent necessary for making 

decisions about peer review 

assignments, such as but not limited to 

knowledge and skills needed to evaluate 

DOJ funding opportunities. 

3. To any person or entity that the 

DOJ has reason to believe possesses 

knowledge regarding matters pertaining 

to DOJ programs and activities, to the 

extent deemed to be necessary by the 

DOJ to elicit information about the 

potential peer reviewer for use in 

conferring the DOJ peer reviewer 

assignments. 

4. To any person or entity that the 

DOJ has reason to believe possesses 

information regarding a matter within 

the jurisdiction of the DOJ, to the extent 

deemed to be necessary by the DOJ to 

elicit such information or cooperation 

from the recipient for use in the 

performance of an authorized activity. 

5. In an appropriate proceeding before 

a court, grand jury, or administrative or 

adjudicative body, when the DOJ 

determines that the records are arguably 

relevant to the proceeding; or in an 

appropriate proceeding before an 

administrative or adjudicative body 

when the adjudicator determines the 

records to be relevant to the proceeding. 

6. To the news media and the public, 

including but not limited to disclosures 

pursuant to 28 CFR 50.2, unless it is 

determined that release of the specific 

information in the context of a 

particular case or matter would 

constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

personal privacy. While disclosures 

under 28 CFR 50.2 are in connection 

with a civil or criminal proceeding, 

disclosures under this routine use may 

also pertain to administrative 

proceedings as well as investigations of 

Federal employee misconduct 

prejudicial to the interests of members 

of the public. 

7. To contractors, recipients, experts, 

consultants, students, and others 

performing or working on a contract, 

service, grant, cooperative agreement, or 

other assignment for the Federal 

Government, when necessary to 

accomplish an agency function related 

to this system of records. 

8. To a former employee of the DOJ 

for official purposes where the DOJ 

requires information and/or 

consultation assistance from the former 

employee regarding a matter within that 

person’s former area of responsibility. 

9. To a Member of Congress or staff 

acting upon the Member’s behalf when 

the Member or staff requests the 

information on behalf of, and at the 

request of, the individual who is the 

subject of the record. 

10. To the National Archives and 

Records Administration for purposes of 

records management inspections 

conducted under the authority of 44 

U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. 

11. To appropriate agencies, entities, 

and persons when (1) the DOJ suspects 

or has confirmed that there has been a 

breach of the system of records; (2) the 

DOJ has determined that as a result of 

the suspected or confirmed breach there 

is a risk of harm to individuals, the DOJ 

(including its information systems, 

programs, and operations), the Federal 

Government, or national security; and 

(3) the disclosure made to such 

agencies, entities, and persons is 

reasonably necessary to assist in 

connection with the DOJ’s efforts to 

respond to the suspected or confirmed 

breach or to prevent, minimize, or 

remedy such harm. 

12. To another Federal agency or 

Federal entity, when the DOJ 

determines that information from this 

system of records is reasonably 

necessary to assist the recipient agency 

or entity in (1) responding to a 

suspected or confirmed breach, or (2) 

preventing, minimizing, or remedying 

the risk of harm to individuals, the 

recipient agency or entity (including its 

information systems, programs, and 

operations), the Federal Government, or 

national security, resulting from a 

suspected or confirmed breach. 

13. To any agency, organization, or 

individual for the purpose of performing 

authorized audit or oversight operations 

of DOJ and meeting related reporting 

requirements. 

14. To such recipients and under such 

circumstances and procedures as are 

mandated by Federal statute or treaty. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF

RECORDS: 

Records in the PRMS are stored in 

electronic format in the OJP cloud 

platforms. Records are stored securely 

in accordance with applicable Federal 

laws, regulations, Department 

directives, and guidance. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETRIEVAL OF

RECORDS: 

Records can be retrieved within 

PRMS by a peer reviewer’s personal 

identifier to obtain profiles or other data 

matching the search criteria necessary 

for the merit review of DOJ funding 

opportunities. 

The records are retrievable by the peer 

reviewer’s name, employee type (other 

Federal agency or other), education 

level, job category, race, cultural and 

ethnic identities, subject matter 

expertise, research expertise, business 

organization, organization unit, job title, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
93658 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 27, 2024 / Notices 

phone number (home and business), 

address (home and business), and 

gender and sexual identities. The 

records are searchable and retrievable 

using those identifiers for diversifying 

the pool of reviewers needed to meet the 

objectives conducive to a full and fair 

evaluation of the relevant OJP funding 

opportunities. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND

DISPOSAL OF RECORDS: 

Records in this system are stored in 

electronic format and retained as well as 

disposed of in accordance with the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration, General Records 

Schedule 1.2, which covers grant and 

cooperative agreement records. 

ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL

SAFEGUARDS: 

This system meets all DOJ 

requirements for authorization to 

operate per DOJ Order 0904, 

Cybersecurity Program. Specifically, 

information in this system is maintained 

in accordance with applicable laws, 

rules, and policies on protecting 

individual privacy. 

The system leverages cloud service 

providers that maintain an authority to 

operate in accordance with applicable 

laws, rules, and policies, including 

Federal Risk and Authorization 

Management Program (FedRAMP) 

requirements. 

Backup information is maintained in 

accordance with a government contract 

that requires adherence to applicable 

laws, rules, and policies. Internet 

connections are protected by multiple 

firewalls. Security personnel conduct 

periodic vulnerability scans using DOJapproved software to ensure security 

compliance and security logs are 

enabled for all computers to assist in 

troubleshooting and forensics analysis 

during incident investigations. Users of 

individual computers can only gain 

access to the data by a valid user’s 

identification and authentication. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

All requests for access to records must 

be in writing and should be addressed 

to the relevant component: 

OJP FOIA Officer; Office of Justice 

Programs; Office of the General Counsel; 

999 North Capitol Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20002. 

The envelope and letter should be 

clearly marked ‘‘Privacy Act Access 

Request.’’ The request must describe the 

records sought in sufficient detail to 

enable DOJ personnel to locate them 

with a reasonable amount of effort. The 

request must include a general 

description of the records sought and 

must include the requester’s full name, 

current address, and date and place of 

birth. The request must be signed and 

either notarized or submitted under 

penalty of perjury. Although no specific 

form is required, you may obtain forms 

for this purpose from the FOIA/Privacy 

Act Mail Referral Unit, United States 

Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530, or 

on the Department of Justice website at 

https://www.justice.gov/oip/oiprequest.html. 

More information regarding the DOJ’s 

procedures for accessing records in 

accordance with the Privacy Act can be 

found at 28 CFR part 16 Subpart D, 

‘‘Protection of Privacy and Access to 

Individual Records Under the Privacy 

Act of 1974.’’ 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to contest or 

amend records pertaining to them, 

maintained in this system of records, 

must direct their requests to the address 

indicated in the ‘‘RECORD ACCESS 

PROCEDURES’’ paragraph, above. All 

requests to contest or amend records 

must be in writing and the envelope and 

letter should be clearly marked ‘‘Privacy 

Act Amendment Request.’’ All requests 

must state clearly and concisely what 

record is being contested, the reasons 

for contesting it, and the proposed 

amendment to the record. 

More information regarding the DOJ’s 

procedures for amending or contesting 

records in accordance with the Privacy 

Act can be found at 28 CFR 16.46, 

‘‘Requests for Amendment or Correction 

of Records.’’ 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: 

Individuals may request to be notified 

if a record in this system of records 

pertains to them by utilizing the same 

procedures as those identified in the 

‘‘RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES’’ 

paragraph, above. 

EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

HISTORY: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2024–27570 Filed 11–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB 1140–0060] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Firearms 

Disabilities for Nonimmigrant Aliens 

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 30 days until 

December 27, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have comments especially on the 

estimated public burden or associated 

response time, suggestions, or need a 

copy of the proposed information 

collection instrument with instructions 

or additional information, please 

contact: Lindsay Babbie, EPS/FEID/ 

FIPB, either by mail at Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 

Explosives; 99 New York Ave. NE, Mail 

Stop 6N–518, Washington, DC 20226, by 

email at Lindsay.Babbie@atf.gov, or 

telephone at 202–648–7252. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register, volume 89, page 80265, on 

Wednesday, October 2, 2024, allowing a 

60-day comment period. Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and/or 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1