alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Darrell Jay GRIMES, Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 81-11360.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland.

Feb. 24, 1982.

Melvin Feldman, Rockville, Md., trustee.

Gregory Johnson, Milwaukee, Wis., for debtor.

*133ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION

PAUL MANNES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came on for hearing upon the Trustee’s Objection to Homestead Exemption. Counsel for the parties presented oral argument thereon. The Trustee urges (1) that *Md.Code Ann.,*Courts and Judicial Proceedings § 11 — 504(f), does not apply to the Debtor’s real property located in the State of Wisconsin; (2) that the Maryland statute does not apply to property located outside of Maryland, and (3) that the Debt- or may not use this statute to exempt real property that he does not occupy. The subject property is occupied by the Debtor’s former wife and minor children.

Were the property located in Maryland, the law of Maryland provides that the exemption could apply to real property used by the Debtor’s dependent children. The pertinent provision of state law provides:

> (f) *Additional exemption; condition.*—In addition to the exemptions provided in § ll-504(b) of this subtitle, and in other statutes of this State, in any proceeding under Title 11 of the United States Code, entitled “Bankruptcy,” any individual debtor domiciled in this State may exempt the debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $4,500 in value, in real property or personal property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, or in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence. *Md.Code Ann.,*Courts and Judicial Proceedings, § 11 — 504(f)(1).

 The fact that the property is located in Wisconsin does not bar the exemption. Chapter 765 of the Laws of Maryland, enacted May 19, 1981, dealt both with changing the exemptions allowed under Md. Constitution III, § 44, and with specifically denying Maryland debtors the ability to elect the federal exemptions under 11 U.S.C. 522(d). The heading of Chapter 765 states it was enacted:

> “FOR the purpose of altering the exemptions from execution on a judgment *and in bankruptcy;*and prohibiting a debtor from electing the federal bankruptcy exemptions.”

It is clear that the Maryland Legislature intended that the exemption deal both with exemptions from execution by Maryland court officials and with bankruptcy exemptions under the Bankruptcy Code. It chose not to impose geographical limitations. While this court has declared unconstitutional § ll-504(f)(2) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code, § 11-504(f)(l) remains in effect. *In re Davis,*16 B.R. 62, Bkrtcy.1981.

For the foregoing reasons, it is, this 24th day of February, 1982, by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland,

ORDERED, That the Trustee’s objection to the “homestead exemption” is overruled.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00298-CV

__________________

DAMIEN CHAVEZ, Appellant

V.

CITY OF PORT NECHES, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-206,463

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Damien Chavez filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment 

signed on September 9, 2021. Appellant has neither asserted that he is unable to 

afford payment of costs for the appeal nor paid the filing fee for the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 5, 20.1. On November 1, 2021, we sent a letter to the parties warning that 

the appeal would be dismissed without further notice unless Appellant paid the filing 

fee. Appellant did not respond to the Clerk’s notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Id.; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 15, 2021

Opinion Delivered December 16, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of meeting.

                    The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     concerning a meeting of the Utah Advisory Committee. The meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, November 20, 2024, at 3 p.m. MT, has been cancelled. The notice is in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Tuesday, November 19, 2024, in FR Document Number 2024-26723 at 89 FR 91319-91320.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Liliana Schiller, Support Services Specialist, at                         *lschiller@usccr.gov*                         or (202) 770-1856.                    

Dated: November 21, 2024.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2024-27738 Filed 11-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
        STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                     --------------------------
                                                       2002              2001
                                                     --------          --------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes,
  minority interest and cumulative
  effect of accounting change                        $ (1,127)         $(15,644)
Interest expense                                        2,789             3,093
Interest portion of rent expense                          208               243
                                                     --------          --------

  EARNINGS                                           $  1,870          $(12,308)
                                                     ========          ========


Interest expense                                     $  2,789          $  3,093
Interest capitalized                                      107               296
Interest portion of rent expense                          208               243
Preferred share accretion                                 699               653
                                                     --------          --------

  FIXED CHARGES                                      $  3,803          $  4,285
                                                     ========          ========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                        0.5                --
                                                     ========          ========
</TABLE>

For purposes of calculating the unaudited ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of income (loss) before provision for income taxes plus fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest charges and amortization of debt
issuance costs, whether expensed or capitalized, the portion of rental expense
that is representative of interest, and preferred share accretion. For the three
months ended September 30, 2002, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charge
requirements by $1,933. For the three months ended September 30, 2001, earnings
were inadequate to cover fixed charge requirements by $16,593.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92666-92667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27406]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2024-OS-0088]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer (CIO), Department of 
Defense, (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
23, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Basic Employee and Security 
Tracking Systems (BEAST); OMB Control Number 0704-0507.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 150.

[[Page 92667]]

    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 150.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 37.5.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain, track, and record the personnel security data, training 
information, and travel history within the White House Military Office 
and White House Communications Agency.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: November 19, 2024.
Stephanie J. Bost,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-27406 Filed 11-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
#### In re Richard S. SOLOMON and Joan F. Solomon, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00555G.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 22, 1981.

Jack Miller, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtors, Richard S. Solomon and Joan F. Solomon.

Leonard P. Goldberger, Philadelphia, Pa., trustee.

*106MEMORANDUM OPINION1

WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge:

The instant case is before us on the application of the debtors for a hearing on the approval of a reaffirmation agreement filed three days after the debtors received a discharge at their discharge hearing. The application is based on Interim Rule 4004 which requires the court to hold a hearing under § 524(d) of the Bankruptcy Code2 within 30 days of the entry of an order granting or denying a discharge. Since the debtors filed their application only three days after their discharge, they assert there is still plenty of time for a hearing under § 524(d) to consider the reaffirmation agreement.

We conclude, however, that the debtors have already had the hearing required by § 524(d). It is the practice of this court to enter an order granting or denying a discharge at the time of the actual § 524(d) hearing. It is that hearing which the debtors herein have already had. Therefore, because a reaffirmation agreement must be approved by the court at the time of the § 524(d) hearing, it is too late for such approval in this case.

However, the debtors raise several reasons why their reaffirmation agreement should be approved. The agreement is in settlement of litigation with a secured creditor and is, the debtors assert, in their best interests. Further, the litigation between the debtors and the creditor was started a little more than a month before the discharge hearing and was not settled before that hearing. As a result, we conclude that there are sufficient equities in the instant case for us to vacate our prior order granting the debtors’ discharge and to reschedule the § 524(d) hearing.

1

. This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 752 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

2

. Section 524(d) requires the court to hold a hearing to inform the debtor whether his discharge is granted or denied and to approve or disapprove any reaffirmation agreements made by the debtor.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2014

s1217

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2014

146357 & (66)(71)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146357

COA: 300460

Grand Traverse CC:

10-011026-FC

ALAN STARR TROWBRIDGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to expand the record is GRANTED. By order of 

October 3, 2014, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave 

to appeal the September 25, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals. The answer having 

been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered. We direct the 

Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. 

MCR 7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of 

Appeals correctly resolved the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim in light 

of People v Douglas, 496 Mich 557 (2014). The parties may file supplemental briefs 

within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of 

their application papers.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Ministerial Joint Press Statement
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Ministerial Joint Press Statement</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Dec. 19, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>Today, the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea announce that they have fully activated a real-time DPRK missile warning data sharing mechanism and jointly established a multi-year trilateral exercise plan. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III, Minister of Defense Kihara Minoru, and Minister of National Defense Shin Wonsik recently agreed to finalize the two initiatives by the end of 2023 at the United States-Japan-Republic of Korea Trilateral Ministerial Meeting in November.  <br />
 </p>

<p>Following the historic 2023 Camp David Summit and the 2022 Phnom Penh Summit, today’s milestones will further advance a new era of trilateral security cooperation under the leadership of President Biden, Prime Minister Kishida, and President Yoon. <br />
 </p>

<p>Following recent tests that verified the full operational capability of the DPRK missile warning data sharing mechanism, the mechanism is now active. The three countries established this mechanism to improve their ability to ensure the safety of their peoples by trilaterally detecting and assessing missiles launched by the DPRK in real-time.<br />
 </p>

<p>Additionally, the three countries have established a multi-year trilateral exercise plan that will begin in early 2024. The three countries have made significant progress on improving the quality and quantity of their exercises over the past year, and this plan will regularize trilateral exercises and execute them more systematically and efficiently moving forward.<br />
 </p>

<p>These achievements and other ongoing efforts demonstrate the unprecedented depth, scale, and scope of trilateral security cooperation by the United States, the Republic of Korea, and Japan. The three countries will continue to build upon their cooperation to respond to regional challenges and ensure peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula, in the Indo-Pacific, and beyond.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
e 

U.S.Deportment of 1200 New jersey Avenue, SE 

Transportation Woshington, DC 20590 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

June 10. 2010 

By Fax; (954) 321-0252 

Mr. Christopher Behnam 

President 

Friendship Airways, Inc, d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi 

4201 Ravenswood Road 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312 

Re: Docket OST-2005-21533 

For Authority to Resume Scheduled Passenger Operations 

as a Commuter Air Carrier 

Dear Mr. Behnam: 

On April 23, 2010, the Department requested further information from Friendship Airways 

Inc., d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi ("YAT") to supplement its application to resume scheduled 

passenger operations as a commuter air caixier. The company's response to our request was 

due May 24, 2010. 

To date, however, we have yet to receive any additional information or response from YAT 

regarding our request for additional information. It is not the Department's policy to keep 

incomplete applications open indefinitely. Therefore, unless YAT provides a complete 

response to our April 23"* Information Request within 14 days of the date of this letter, we 

intend to dismiss its application without further notice. 

Thaiik you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this 

letter, please feel free to contact Katy O'TooIe at (202) 366-9998. 

Sincerely, 

Vanessa R. BalgoBin ^ 

Acting Chief 

Air Camer Fitness Division 
cc: Docket DOT-OST-2005-21533 

Mr. Jerry Proenza 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2895 SW 145"" Avenue 

Suite 120 

Miramar, FL 33027
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1402 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1402

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
provide for a macadamia tree health initiative, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

  Ms. Gabbard (for herself and Ms. Hanabusa) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
provide for a macadamia tree health initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Macadamia Tree Health Initiative''.

SEC. 2. MACADAMIA TREE HEALTH INITIATIVE.

    Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade 
Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Macadamia tree health initiative.--Research and 
        extension grants may be made under this section for the 
        purposes of--
                    ``(A) developing and disseminating science-based 
                tools and treatments to combat the macadamia felted 
                coccid (Eriococcus ironsidei); and
                    ``(B) establishing an areawide integrated pest 
                management program in areas affected by, or areas at 
                risk of being affected by, the macadamia felted 
                coccid.''.
                                 <all>
```
264-14 SAS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## Hi=AF11 OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THEMATTER OF: ) FAA CASE NO. 2014-GL-70-0239 ) COMPASS SYSTEMS & SALES, INC. Respondent. ) FDMS No. FAA-2015-2440 ) ) JUDGE J.E. SULLIVAN ) ) RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF ) SERVICE OF INITIAL ) DISCLOSURES PURSUANT ) TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)
NOW COMES Respondent, Compass Systems & Sales, Inc. (herein, "Respondent"), by and through their legal counsel, and hereby notifies the Court that Respondent's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) were served upon Brian Kalm, Esq., counsel for the Claimant, the Federal Aviation Administration

- U.S. Department of Transportation, by OvernightMail onNovember 19, 2015. Respectfully Submitted,

### ~-=--=--=--~=--....'::__:::::.-=====--·~ Stuart A. Strasfeld, E q. (Ohio #0012399) Louis P. Alexander, Jr., Esq. (Ohio #0076529) Roth, Blair, Roberts, Strasfeld & Lodge, L.P.A. 100 EastFederal Street, Suite 600 Youngstown, Ohio 44503 Telephone: (330) 744-5211 Facsimile: (330) 744-3184 Email: sstrasfeld@roth-blair.com lalexander@roth-blair.com Attorney for Respondent, Compass Systems & Sales, IncCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that, in accordance with 14 CFR 13.210, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Respondent's Notice ofService oflnitialDisclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) were sent via Overnight Mail this 19th day ofNovember, 2015, to the following address for filing withthe Federal Aviation Administration: FederalAviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2W1000 Washington D.C. 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk,AGC-430
I HEREBY CERTIFY that, in accordance with 14 CFR 13.211, a true and accurate copy ofthe foregoing Respondent's Notice ofService oflnitialDisclosures Pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) was served uponthe following via Overnight Mail this 19th day ofNovember, 2015.
Brian K. Kahn, Esq. FederalAviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 EastDevon Avenue, AGL-7H Des Plaines, IL 60018 Attorney for Complainant, FederalAviationAdministration
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing Respondent's Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) was served upon the following via OvernightMail this 19th day ofNovember, 2015. Hon. J.E. Sullivan, AdministrateLaw Judge Office ofHearings,M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590

# ---

**/---~** 

# ---

**~-** ) 

# L

**~** 

# /
. 6



### ~ .c./



### ~?2~/ **~c:-** 

# 2/----- STUART A. STRASFlLD (Ohio #0012399) Attorney for Respondent, Compass Systems & Sales, Inc.
Date: November 19,2015 I

# ?)
No. 91-6233.

#### McGhee *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.