# U.S. EPA Data Request

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Johns Manville

Cleburne Plant

200 West Industrial Boulevard

Cleburne, Texas 76031

Project No. 11-4191.02

February 22, 2012

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

(248) 548-8070

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 i 

# Executive Summary

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standa rd under Section 7412 of

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to requi re that persons who operate any emission source

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”

. Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has re quired that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions

for the purpose of providing resi dual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 1



# .

To assist in collecting the ag reed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack

associated with the Line 91 Melter Dust Collector located at Johns Manville in Cleburne, Texas:

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 

# ) using SW-846 Method 0061

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061

Table I on the following page summarizes the over all results of the emi ssions test program.

1 

# Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 ii 

# Table I

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector

Test Dates: January 24 th 

# and 25 th 

# , 2012

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 9.4 x 10 -2 

# 1.0

USEPA

Method 29 Filterable Chromium

(FCr) < 1.5 x 10 -5 

# 1.6 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) 3.2 x 10 -5 

# 3.5 x 10 -4



# Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.7 x 10 -5 

# 5.1 x 10 -4



# USEPA

Method 0061 Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) 4.4 x 10 -4 

# 4.7 x 10 -3



# Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.8 x 10 -3 

# 1.9 x 10 -2



# Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

# because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

# ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 iii 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

# M ONITORING 

# ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES .............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

# G AS 

# V ELOCITY



# , M OLECULAR 

# W EIGHT



# , AND 

# M OISTURE 

# C ONTENT 

# .................... 2

3.2 PM, FC R



# , VC R



# , AND 

# TC R 

# C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

# E MISSION 

# R ATES 

# ................................. 3

3.3 C R +6 

# AND 

# TC R 

# C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

# E MISSION 

# R ATES 

# ................................................... 3

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 4

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – Overall Emission Test Results Summary

Table 3 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Table 3 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Line 91 Melter Dust Collector Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 3 – Method 5/29 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 4 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Field and Co mputer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes

Appendix B – Process Data

Appendix C – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix D – Laboratory Analytical Reports

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 1 

# 1.0 Introduction

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standa rd under Section 7412 of

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to requi re that persons who operate any emission source

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”

. Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has re quired that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions

for the purpose of providing resi dual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2



# .

To assist in collecting the ag reed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack

associated with the Line 91 Melter Dust Collector located at Johns Manville in Cleburne, Texas:

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr +6 

# ) using SW-846 Method 0061

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061

The emissions test program was conducted on January 24 and 25, 2012. The test program

consisted of triplicate 240-minute emission tests for each parameter. The field sampling portion

of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

Barry Boulianne BTEC

Matthew Young BTEC

Shane Lee METCO Environmental

Matthew Gillen METCO Environmental

Shane Rennick METCO Environmental

Ricardo Santos Johns Manville

2 

# Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 2 

# 2.0 Process Description

Glass batch is fed to two electric melters which flow to a forehearth, from there it flows through

four spinner modules where the bi nder is added to form fibergla ss. The two melters exhaust to a

single dust collector.

2.1 Process Monitoring

Process and control equipment data collected during the emissions test program includes the

following:

(1) Total Melter's Pull Rate (lbs/hr)

(2) Melter Dust Co llector Pressure Drop (inches H2O)

Process production data is availabl e in Appendix B. Control equipm ent data will be available to

U.S. EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the em issions test program can be separated into

three categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates

using Methods 5/29; and

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas CR +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emission rates using

Method 0061.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.3, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content were conducted

using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Molecula r Weight of Dry Stack

Gas”(Integrated tedlar bags)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

These test methods were used to evaluate e xhaust gas flowrates in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies.

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 3 

# Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing.

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A, “Determination of Oxygen

and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emi ssions from Stationary Sources”. The O 2 

# content of

the exhaust gas was measured us ing an M&C Products PMA 100-L O 2 

# gas analyzer and the CO 2 

# content of the exhaust gas was measured usi ng a California Analytical Instruments (CAI) 600

Series CO 2 

# gas analyzer. A sample of the gas streamwas drawn through an insulated stainlesssteel probe into a sample conditioner to remove th e moisture from the sample before it entered

the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition

software.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated usin g Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

determined gravimetrically.

3.2 

# PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr Concen trations and Emission Rates

PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emi ssion rates were measured using the procedures

of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 5 and 29. Se lected metals concentrations and emission

rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling

system. This system consisted of (1) a borosi licate glass or quartz no zzle, (2) a steel probe

w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of four GS impingers, (5) a

length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5%

nitric acid (HNO 3 

# )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the

fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the

PM/metals sampling train is provided as Figure 3.

3.3 Cr +6 

# and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates

Measurement of Cr +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emissi on rates were measured using the

procedures Method 0061. Cr +6 

# and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using

BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack samp ling system. This system consisted

of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a

recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6 ) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control

case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first

impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were fille d with 75 mL of 0.1 N

KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinge r contained approximately 300 g of silica gel

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Met hod 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 4 

# 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions te st program are summarized by Table 2.

Table 2

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector

Test Methods Pollutant MDL

used Emission

Rate

(lbs/hour) Emission

Rate

(lbs/ton) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

USEPA

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 9.4 x 10 -2 

# 1.0

USEPA

Method 29 Filterable Chromium

(FCr) < 1.5 x 10 -5 

# 1.6 x 10 -4



# Vaporous Chromium

(VCr) 3.2 x 10 -5 

# 3.5 x 10 -4



# Total Chromium (TCr) < 4.7 x 10 -5 

# 5.1 x 10 -4



# USEPA

Method 0061 Hexavalent Chromium

(Cr +6 

# ) 4.4 x 10 -4 

# 4.7 x 10 -3



# Total Chromium (TCr) < 1.8 x 10 -3 

# 1.9 x 10 -2



# Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

# because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

# ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



# Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Field and

computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix A. Process data associated with the

emissions test program is provided in Appe ndix B. Equipment calibration documents are

provided in Appendix C. Labor atory analytical results are available in Appendix D.

# Johns Manville Cleburne BTEC Project No. 11-4191.02

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 5 

# Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this re port are exclusively for use by Johns Manville.

BTEC will not distribute or pub lish this report without Johns Manville’s consent except as

required by law or court order. BTEC accepts re sponsibility for the competent performance of

its duties in executing the assignment and prep aring reports in accordance with the normal

standards of the profession, but disclaims a ny responsibility for consequential damages.

This report was prepared by:

Brandon Chase

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# Tables

# Table 3

Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM cleburne

Source Designation L91 MBH

Test Date 1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 65.3 69.5 60.5 65.1

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 29.3 29.2 29.2 29.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 142.2 141.8 143.1 142.4

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 140.9 139.0 142.7 140.9

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 3.99 3.94 4.04 3.99

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 2.805 3.296 3.423 3.175

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0739 0.0739 0.0739 0.0739

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745 0.0745

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 10.63 10.51 10.80 10.64

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 10.50 10.36 10.64 10.50

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000357 0.000357 0.000357 0.000357

Isokinetic Variation - I 98.5 99.3 100.1 99.3

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 163.9 164.6 141.7 156.7

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.988 0.987 0.987 0.987

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.95 2.32 2.34 2.20

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0195 0.0232 0.0234 0.0220

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 27.9 27.8 27.8 27.8

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.0 35.5 34.8 35.4

Area of Stack (ft2) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Actual) 31,796 31,381 30,797 31,325

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Wet) 25,083 24,642 25,103 24,943

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Dry) 24,594 24,071 24,515 24,393

Flowrate m 3 

# (standard dry) 696 682 694 691

Total Particulate Weights (mg)

Acetone Rinse 4.0 1.7 5.7 3.8

Filter < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.3

Total < 4.3 < 2.0 < 6.0 4.1

Total Particulate Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 8.9E-04 < 4.2E-04 < 1.2E-03 8.5E-04

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 9.0E-04 < 4.3E-04 < 1.2E-03 8.6E-04

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.1E+00 < 5.1E-01 < 1.5E+00 1.0E+00

gr/dscf < 4.7E-04 < 2.2E-04 < 6.5E-04 4.5E-04

Total Particulate Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 1.0E-01 < 4.6E-02 < 1.4E-01 9.4E-02

lb/ ton product

Filterable Chromium Weights (ug)

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) < 0.60 < 0.60 0.71 0.64

Filterable Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.2E-07 < 1.3E-07 1.4E-07 1.3E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 1.3E-07 < 1.3E-07 1.5E-07 1.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.5E-04 < 1.5E-04 1.8E-04 1.6E-04

gr/dscf < 6.6E-08 < 6.7E-08 7.7E-08 7.0E-08

Filterable Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 1.4E-05 < 1.4E-05 1.6E-05 1.5E-05

lb/ ton product

Vaporous Chromium Weights (ug)

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 1.99 0.60 1.60 1.40

Vaporous Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) 4.1E-07 1.3E-07 3.3E-07 2.9E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) 4.2E-07 1.3E-07 3.3E-07 2.9E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 5.0E-04 1.5E-04 4.0E-04 3.5E-04

gr/dscf 2.2E-07 6.7E-08 1.7E-07 1.5E-07

Vaporous Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr 4.6E-05 1.4E-05 3.6E-05 3.2E-05

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weights (ug)

Total Chromium < 2.59 < 1.20 2.31 2.03

Total Chromium Concentrations

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 5.4E-07 < 2.5E-07 4.7E-07 4.2E-07

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 5.4E-07 < 2.6E-07 4.8E-07 4.3E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 6.5E-04 < 3.0E-04 5.7E-04 5.1E-04

gr/dscf < 2.8E-07 < 1.3E-07 2.5E-07 2.2E-07

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 6.0E-05 < 2.8E-05 5.3E-05 4.7E-05

lb/ ton product

# Table 4

Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company Johns Mansville

Source Designation L91-MBH

Test Date 1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 62.2 66.1 58.4 62.2

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 29.3 29.2 29.2 29.2

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 143.3 138.6 146.0 142.6

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 140.9 134.8 144.2 140.0

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 3.99 3.82 4.08 3.96

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 2.508 2.475 3.117 2.700

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0742 0.0741 0.0739 0.0741

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0746 0.0746 0.0745 0.0746

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 10.64 10.18 10.88 10.57

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 10.52 10.06 10.74 10.44

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000349 0.000349 0.000349 0.000349

Isokinetic Variation - I 100.3 99.2 100.1 99.9

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 168.4 167.7 142.5 159.5

Oxygen Concentration (%) 20.0 20.0 20.2

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.9 28.9 28.8 28.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.7 28.7 28.6 28.7

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.991 0.990 0.987 0.990

Percent Moisture (Bws) 1.75 1.80 2.12 1.89

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0175 0.0180 0.0212 0.0189

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 27.9 27.8 27.8 27.8

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 36.3 35.2 36.0 35.8

Area of Stack (ft2) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Actual) 32,113 31,148 31,798 31,686

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Wet) 25,152 24,337 25,884 25,124

Flowrate ft 3 

# (Standard Dry) 24,712 23,898 25,336 24,649

Flowrate m 3 

# (standard dry) 700 677 717 698

Total Hexavalent Chromium Weight (ug)

Hexavalent Chromium 1.68 2.75 52.30 18.91

Total Hexavalent Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) 3.5E-07 6.0E-07 1.1E-05 3.8E-06

lb/1000 lb (dry) 3.5E-07 6.0E-07 1.1E-05 3.9E-06

mg/dscm (dry) 4.2E-04 7.2E-04 1.3E-02 4.7E-03

Total Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr 3.9E-05 6.5E-05 1.2E-03 4.4E-04

lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weight (ug)

Back Half Chromium < 4.00 < 3.00 190.00 65.67

Rinse Chromium 1.00 8.00 31.00 13.33

Total Chromium < 5.00 < 11.00 221.00 79.00

Total Chromium Concentration

lb/1000 lb (wet) < 1.0E-06 < 2.4E-06 4.5E-05 1.6E-05

lb/1000 lb (dry) < 1.0E-06 < 2.4E-06 4.5E-05 1.6E-05

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.3E-03 < 2.9E-03 5.4E-02 1.9E-02

Total Chromium Emission Rate

lb/ hr < 1.2E-04 < 2.6E-04 5.2E-03 1.8E-03

lb/ ton product

# Figures

# diameter = 52"

Points Distance "

8 1

. 7

7 5

. 5

6 10.1

5 16.8

4 35.2

3 41.9

2 46.5

1 50.3



# Figure 1

Site: Sampling Dates:

Johns Manv ille January 25-26, 2012

Cleburne, Texas

Line 91 Melter Dust Collector BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan Not to Scale > 2 diameter

> 8 diameter

# Bags Samples

to analyzers



# Figure 2

Site: Sampling Dates:

USEPA Method 3 A January 24-25, 2012

Johns Manville

Cleburne, Texas BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan Data Acquisition System



# Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O

2 

# Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO

2 

# Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site:Sampling Dates:USEPA Methods 5/29January 24-25, 2012Johns ManvilleCleburne, TexasBT Environmental Consulting Inc.4949 Fernlee AvenueRoyal Oak, Michigan 48073PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 4Site:Sampling Dates:USEPA Method 0061January 24-25, 2012Johns ManvilleCleburn, TexasBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.4949 Fernlee AvenueRoyal Oak, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOH

# Appendix A

Field and Computer Generate d Raw Data and Field NotesOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryJohns Manville - Cleburne, TexasBTEC Project No. 11-4191.02Sampling Dates: 1/24/12-1/25/12ParameterRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 AverageTest Run Date1/24/2012 1/24/2012 1/25/2012Test Time8:39-12:38 13:36-17:36 7:31-11:45Oxygen concentration (%)20.2020.11 20.15 20.15Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 7E)19.8520.14 20.13 20.04Carbon Dioxide concentration (%)0.070.11 0.13 0.10Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 7E)0.100.11 0.14 0.12CO2CorrectionO2Correction1 2312 3Co-0.03-0.01 -0.01Co-0.03 -0.03 -0.03Cma10.9010.90 10.90Cma11.00 11.00 11.00Cm10.8011.15 10.88Cm11.19 10.97 11.00Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gasesCompanyJM cleburneSource DesignationL91 MBHTest Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)3Test NumberMtls-Run 1Condensate Volume (Vlc)33.6OperatorBBSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)25.9Filter Number11112520Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.20Leak Rate Initial0.002@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.002@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.806Pitot Tube Number51-5-6Meter Corr. Factor (Y)1.008Meter NumberT6-2Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)-CO20.1Delta∆H@1.7O219.85Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 8:35 5 142 0.40 1.23 1.25 609.38 66 66 55250254 612.64 109.4255 165 0.42 1.29 1.28 612.94 66 65 49249256 616.21 97.63105 157 0.42 1.29 1.28 616.13 66 65 49250256 619.42 102.44155 157 0.42 1.29 1.24 619.50 64 63 42250256 622.78 97.65204 164 0.39 1.20 1.10 622.70 66 63 42251255 625.85 102.36254 165 0.30 0.92 0.90 625.92 66 63 42250251 628.68 102.17304 161 0.32 0.98 0.92 628.74 66 63 42250251 631.60 96.88354 161 0.30 0.92 0.90 631.51 65 63 41251250 634.28 97.29405 161 0.44 1.35 1.30 634.20 65 63 42251252 637.55 97.110454 159 0.35 1.07 1.03 637.45 65 64 42252258 640.45 97.511504 166 0.28 0.86 0.83 640.37 64 63 42251254 643.03 99.212554 170 0.22 0.67 0.65 643.01 64 63 42251255 645.36 98.213604 166 0.25 0.77 0.74 645.32 63 63 48250251 647.83 97.114655 170 0.34 1.04 1.00 647.76 65 64 50247252 650.69 100.515705 164 0.35 1.07 1.00 650.70 65 64 50248252 653.68 97.516754 166 0.35 1.07 1.00 653.61 65 64 49247250 656.59 100.717804 167 0.32 0.98 0.95 656.61 65 63 51248251 659.45 98.118854 170 0.25 0.77 0.74 659.40 65 64 51247250 661.91 103.119905 142 0.43 1.32 1.28 661.99 65 64 50249256 665.36 96.620955 132 0.44 1.35 1.32 665.24 65 64 52249258 668.68 96.2211005 166 0.43 1.32 1.30 668.54 63 63 53251257 671.83 97.6221055 165 0.44 1.35 1.30 671.75 64 63 54251257 675.09 97.5231104 169 0.27 0.83 0.80 675.00 64 65 53250257 677.61 99.2241154 162 0.26 0.80 0.77 677.59 63 65 53251258 680.16 92.4120 10:35679.971120 10:46 4 150 0.26 0.80 0.82 680.09 65 66 56248256 682.70 102.021254 165 0.36 1.10 1.10 682.75 65 66 57250255 685.78 99.431305 169 0.33 1.01 1.00 685.76 66 66 56250254 688.66 101.641355 160 0.30 0.92 0.95 688.70 66 65 57251254 691.48 99.751405 170 0.33 1.01 1.05 691.47 66 65 58252253 694.36 101.461455 166 0.36 1.10 1.14 694.40 66 65 59251254 697.43 100.171505 166 0.39 1.20 1.24 697.43 66 67 60250254 700.59 99.981554 168 0.33 1.01 1.00 700.58 65 67 60251252 703.48 96.391604 170 0.28 0.86 0.90 703.37 64 66 59250252 706.03 101.9101655 170 0.34 1.04 1.08 706.08 66 67 54250256 709.02 100.1111705 173 0.34 1.04 1.08 709.02 66 66 53251256 711.95 99.1121754 176 0.26 0.80 0.83 711.92 67 66 54250255 714.48 104.8131805 169 0.38 1.16 1.20 714.60 67 65 54251256 717.71 100.2141855 169 0.40 1.23 1.25 717.71 67 66 55252254 720.90 97.0151905 173 0.36 1.11 1.10 720.80 67 64 53251255 723.81 99.7161955 162 0.40 1.23 1.20 723.80 66 65 52250257 727.00 103.5172005 174 0.40 1.23 1.20 727.11 67 65 52250257 730.28 99.3182055 164 0.50 1.54 1.60 730.26 67 66 53251258 733.84 94.3192105 165 0.45 1.39 1.44 733.63 67 67 54251256 737.03 99.9202154 165 0.33 1.02 1.06 737.02 68 67 54251254 739.93 101.0212204 165 0.30 0.93 0.97 739.96 67 68 54250257 742.74 103.0222254 165 0.32 0.99 1.00 742.82 67 68 54254253 745.69 99.8232304 164 0.30 0.93 0.98 745.68 68 68 54252254 748.46 100.0242355 163 0.44 1.37 1.40 748.46 68 67 54251253 751.83 94.8240 12:46751.65Average 240163.9 0.35 1.08 1.07 142.150 65.6 65.0 51.5 250.3 254.4 681.999.465.28CompanyJM cleburnSource DesignationL91 MBHTest Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)3Test NumberMtls-Run 2Condensate Volume (Vlc)45.8OperatorBBSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)24.1Filter Number11112519Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.10Leak Rate Initial0.001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.001@12"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.806Pitot Tube Number51-5-6Meter Corr. Factor (Y)1.008Meter NumberT6-2Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.11Delta∆H@1.7O220.14Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 13:35 4 156 0.33 1.02 1.00 752.80 69 69 62248256 755.75 101.5254 169 0.30 0.93 0.92 755.79 68 69 62250257 758.57 101.23104 167 0.35 1.08 1.10 758.60 70 69 61251253 761.61 101.44155 169 0.47 1.46 1.45 761.65 70 70 60252257 765.14 100.55205 170 0.45 1.40 1.40 765.15 70 70 60251256 768.56 100.26255 171 0.33 1.02 1.00 768.56 71 70 61251255 771.48 100.17304 170 0.29 0.90 0.90 771.48 70 70 61251257 774.22 102.38354 173 0.30 0.93 0.93 774.28 71 70 60252257 777.06 99.79405 166 0.50 1.56 1.50 777.05 69 71 61251256 780.65 98.910455 168 0.48 1.50 1.50 780.61 70 70 57252255 784.14 99.111505 165 0.35 1.09 1.09 784.10 71 70 58252253 787.12 100.012555 164 0.35 1.09 1.09 787.12 71 70 56251253 790.14 95.013604 169 0.30 0.94 0.93 789.99 70 70 55251253 792.78 99.814654 169 0.33 1.03 1.00 792.77 70 71 54252253 795.69 101.615704 165 0.40 1.25 1.25 795.74 70 72 55251253 798.97 99.416755 165 0.41 1.29 1.28 798.95 71 72 56250254 802.23 99.017805 165 0.40 1.26 1.25 802.19 70 72 55250251 805.42 99.718854 165 0.29 0.91 0.91 805.41 69 72 55251252 808.16 99.719904 165 0.30 0.95 0.94 808.15 69 71 55250251 810.94 99.520954 162 0.33 1.04 1.04 810.93 69 71 54252249 813.87 102.5211004 161 0.28 0.88 0.88 813.94 68 70 53251248 816.64 99.9221054 162 0.29 0.92 0.91 816.64 68 70 55251250 819.39 99.0231104 162 0.28 0.89 0.88 819.36 68 70 55250256 822.06 100.0241154 161 0.30 0.95 0.95 822.06 69 70 55251256 824.86 90.7120 15:35824.601120 15:45 4 161 0.35 1.11 1.10 824.91 68 70 56250255 827.93 100.021254 162 0.30 0.95 0.95 827.93 70 71 56250255 830.73 99.931304 161 0.29 0.92 0.92 830.73 69 70 55251254 833.48 97.041354 161 0.25 0.80 0.80 833.40 69 71 56251254 835.96 97.751404 161 0.30 0.96 0.96 835.90 68 70 56250255 838.70 100.561454 160 0.25 0.80 0.80 838.71 68 70 56251253 841.27 101.371504 161 0.39 1.25 1.25 841.30 69 70 56250255 844.49 99.781554 164 0.39 1.25 1.25 844.48 70 71 55251253 847.67 96.991604 167 0.35 1.12 1.12 847.57 70 71 56254254 850.59 100.5101654 170 0.29 0.93 0.93 850.60 70 71 55250257 853.34 100.1111704 166 0.29 0.93 0.93 853.34 70 71 55252256 856.09 99.7121754 166 0.25 0.80 0.80 856.08 70 71 55251256 858.63 100.3131804 179 0.39 1.26 1.25 858.64 71 72 56252257 861.80 100.7141855 162 0.45 1.45 1.45 861.82 68 69 57251254 865.24 100.4151905 161 0.42 1.36 1.35 865.25 68 68 57251254 868.55 98.5161955 160 0.35 1.13 1.13 868.50 67 69 57254254 871.52 100.1172004 164 0.32 1.04 1.03 871.52 67 69 57248258 874.40 100.5182054 170 0.30 0.97 0.98 874.41 68 67 56247255 877.18 102.6192105 161 0.41 1.33 1.30 877.25 68 68 55248249 880.51 100.0202154 160 0.35 1.14 1.13 880.51 68 69 56248250 883.53 101.0212204 160 0.30 0.98 0.97 883.56 67 68 54248252 886.35 100.0222254 161 0.30 0.98 0.97 886.35 67 68 55250251 889.14 100.0232304 161 0.31 1.01 1.00 889.14 67 68 55251252 891.98 103.0242354 161 0.30 0.98 0.98 892.06 66 68 56250252 894.85 103.7240 17:45894.95Average 240164.6 0.34 1.08 1.07 141.840 69 70 5725125482610069.51CompanyJM cleburnSource DesignationL91 MBHTest Date1/25/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)3Test NumberMtls-Run 3Condensate Volume (Vlc)44.7OperatorBBSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)27.9Filter Number11112519Nozzle Diameter (in.)0.256Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.10Leak Rate Initial0.00@13"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.00@7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.806Pitot Tube Number51-5-6Meter Corr. Factor (Y)1.008Meter NumberT6-2Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.14Delta∆H@1.7O220.13Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 7:30 4 161 0.35 1.10 1.00 906.63 58 57 48252252 909.59 96.1254 137 0.25 0.79 0.77 909.47 57 58 46253259 912.02 101.23105 139 0.35 1.10 1.09 912.05 58 58 45251257 915.06 103.34154 132 0.25 0.79 0.78 915.16 58 58 44252259 917.72 105.45204 138 0.30 0.94 0.94 917.86 58 58 45251255 920.65 101.86255 135 0.47 1.48 1.48 920.70 59 58 44251256 924.21 102.37304 134 0.30 0.94 0.95 924.28 59 58 43252259 927.08 101.78354 141 0.29 0.91 0.92 927.13 59 58 43252259 929.87 104.79404 142 0.29 0.91 0.92 930.00 59 60 44253249 932.74 99.910454 141 0.33 1.04 1.05 932.74 59 60 43246253 935.67 99.711504 136 0.33 1.04 1.05 935.66 59 60 43242259 938.60 100.012555 137 0.45 1.42 1.43 938.60 59 60 43241254 942.03 101.013604 135 0.26 0.82 0.83 942.06 60 61 44253256 944.68 104.314654 143 0.27 0.85 0.86 944.79 60 61 44251258 947.44 101.915704 146 0.30 0.94 0.96 947.49 60 61 44251255 950.28 97.316754 145 0.30 0.94 0.96 950.20 60 61 44247259 952.99 96.817804 138 0.30 0.94 0.96 952.90 60 62 44249254 955.71 96.218855 138 0.45 1.42 1.44 955.60 60 62 44249254 959.04 99.019905 136 0.34 1.07 1.09 959.00 60 62 44251254 961.99 100.920954 141 0.24 0.76 0.77 962.02 60 62 44251256 964.53 98.6211004 131 0.30 0.94 0.97 964.49 60 62 46252258 967.31 100.2221054 140 0.24 0.76 0.77 967.32 60 61 45252257 969.82 101.8231105 135 0.40 1.26 1.29 969.87 60 61 45251253 973.12 100.2241155 137 0.45 1.42 1.46 973.12 59 61 46249254 976.55 99.1120 9:30976.521120 9:43 5 140 0.35 1.10 1.10 976.95 60 61 44245263 979.97 99.221255 136 0.32 1.01 1.00 979.95 60 61 43244262 982.85 102.031305 137 0.45 1.42 1.45 982.91 60 59 44250257 986.34 100.141355 137 0.45 1.42 1.46 986.34 59 61 46251253 989.77 93.651404 144 0.28 0.88 0.91 989.55 59 61 46248255 992.24 104.361454 144 0.28 0.88 0.91 992.36 59 61 46253258 995.05 102.171504 135 0.32 1.01 1.04 995.11 60 61 46249257 998.01 96.181554 145 0.30 0.94 0.98 997.90 60 61 47254256 1000.69 100.491605 140 0.50 1.57 1.64 1000.70 60 61 49252256 1004.32 95.6101655 141 0.48 1.51 1.57 1004.15 60 62 52250259 1007.69 102.6111704 144 0.31 0.98 1.02 1007.78 60 62 54251261 1010.62 102.9121754 149 0.28 0.88 0.92 1010.70 61 62 55253256 1013.39 102.2131805 139 0.33 1.04 1.08 1013.45 61 62 55251252 1016.40 94.4141855 148 0.33 1.04 1.08 1016.23 61 62 55252255 1019.15 99.9151905 143 0.48 1.51 1.58 1019.15 61 63 55252257 1022.69 102.1161955 143 0.40 1.26 1.32 1022.76 61 63 57252252 1025.99 100.6172005 147 0.30 0.95 0.99 1026.01 61 63 59252255 1028.80 106.4182055 153 0.29 0.92 0.96 1028.98 61 63 60252254 1031.71 100.3192105 137 0.35 1.11 1.16 1031.72 61 63 59251255 1034.76 100.0202155 154 0.28 0.89 0.93 1034.76 61 63 60251258 1037.44 104.4212205 146 0.45 1.43 1.49 1037.56 62 63 60251257 1040.99 102.3222255 149 0.44 1.40 1.46 1041.06 62 63 60252259 1044.44 103.4232305 154 0.30 0.96 0.99 1044.55 62 64 62252257 1047.33 106.1242355 158 0.28 0.89 0.93 1047.50 62 64 63249259 1050.18 100.4240 11:431050.19Average 240141.7 0.34 1.07 1.10 143.130 59.9 61.0 48.8 250.4 256.3 978.9 100.760.46CompanyJohns Mansville CleburneSource DesignationL91-MBHTest Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number0061-Run 1Condensate Volume (Vlc)10.4OperatorM. GillenSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)42.8Filter NumberNANozzle Diameter (in.)0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.20Leak Rate Initial0.003@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.005@18"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.808Pitot Tube NumberT6-5-2Meter Corr. Factor (Y)0.994Meter Number51-4Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.5Delta∆H@1.7O220Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 8:35 5 161 0.39 1.15 1.25 930.58 59 63 60NANANA 933.72 99.025 8:40 5 161 0.46 1.36 1.40 933.68 59 63 60NANANA 937.09 100.2310 8:45 5 158 0.45 1.33 1.40 937.09 59 63 62NANANA 940.47 94.3415 8:50 5 151 0.42 1.24 1.30 940.27 59 63 66NANANA 943.55 98.8520 8:55 5 167 0.28 0.83 0.87 943.51 59 62 64NANANA 946.15 135.3625 9:00 5.5 157 0.30 0.88 0.94 947.09 60 62 62NANANA 949.85 128.1730 9:05 5 168 0.32 0.94 1.00 950.62 60 62 59NANANA 953.45 53.8835 9:10 5 163 0.40 1.18 1.25 952.14 60 62 57NANANA 955.31 90.9940 9:15 5 161 0.41 1.21 1.30 955.02 60 62 57NANANA 958.24 90.21045 9:20 5 161 0.28 0.83 0.88 957.92 60 61 56NANANA 960.58 128.01150 9:25 5 168 0.24 0.71 0.75 961.32 60 61 57NANANA 963.77 122.31255 9:30 5 164 0.27 0.80 0.85 964.31 60 61 57NANANA 966.91 134.91360 9:35 5 168 0.25 0.74 0.79 967.82 60 61 60NANANA 970.32 121.81465 9:40 4 173 0.35 1.03 1.10 970.86 60 61 57NANANA 973.80 82.01570 9:45 4 167 0.40 1.18 1.25 973.27 60 61 57NANANA 976.43 96.01675 9:50 4 167 0.42 1.24 1.30 976.30 60 61 57NANANA 979.54 95.61780 9:55 5 170 0.32 0.94 1.00 979.39 60 61 57NANANA 982.21 98.31885 10:00 5 173 0.30 0.88 0.90 982.16 60 61 58NANANA 984.88 101.01990 10:05 5 169 0.30 0.88 0.90 984.91 60 61 57NANANA 987.64 99.22095 10:10 4.5 172 0.40 1.18 1.20 987.62 61 61 57NANANA 990.77 98.521100 10:15 4.5 164 0.36 1.06 1.10 990.72 61 61 58NANANA 993.73 98.522105 10:20 4.5 164 0.45 1.33 1.35 993.68 61 61 58NANANA 997.04 99.523110 10:25 5 167 0.28 0.83 0.85 997.02 61 61 58NANANA 999.67 97.924115 10:30 4.5 171 0.30 0.88 0.90 999.61 61 61 58NANANA 1002.34 101.5120 10:301002.381120 10:46 4 163 0.31 0.91 0.94 1002.73 62 62 53NANANA 1005.52 98.42125 10:51 4 169 0.29 0.86 0.88 1005.48 62 62 54NANANA 1008.17 101.73130 10:56 4 173 0.28 0.83 0.85 1008.22 62 62 54NANANA 1010.86 98.64135 11:01 4 176 0.34 1.00 1.05 1010.82 62 62 55NANANA 1013.72 99.35140 11:06 4 173 0.30 0.88 0.92 1013.70 63 62 56NANANA 1016.43 102.16145 11:11 4.5 176 0.45 1.33 1.40 1016.49 63 63 57NANANA 1019.83 99.77150 11:16 5 171 0.47 1.39 1.45 1019.82 63 63 58NANANA 1023.25 98.78155 11:21 5 171 0.30 0.88 0.92 1023.20 63 63 60NANANA 1025.94 98.99160 11:26 5 176 0.28 0.83 0.86 1025.91 63 63 61NANANA 1028.55 100.510165 11:31 5 175 0.37 1.09 1.15 1028.56 64 63 61NANANA 1031.60 100.511170 11:36 4.5 174 0.32 0.94 0.98 1031.61 64 63 61NANANA 1034.44 98.012175 11:41 4.5 178 0.49 1.45 1.50 1034.38 64 64 61NANANA 1037.87 98.713180 11:46 5 171 0.38 1.12 1.20 1037.82 64 64 63NANANA 1040.91 103.314185 11:51 4.5 170 0.36 1.06 1.10 1041.01 64 64 65NANANA 1044.02 99.715190 11:56 4.5 174 0.28 0.83 0.86 1044.01 64 64 60NANANA 1046.66 100.916195 12:01 4.5 163 0.36 1.07 1.10 1046.68 64 64 58NANANA 1049.71 100.517200 12:06 4 174 0.29 0.86 0.90 1049.72 64 64 57NANANA 1052.41 100.618205 12:11 4 178 0.47 1.39 1.45 1052.43 64 64 56NANANA 1055.85 97.619210 12:16 5 169 0.45 1.34 1.40 1055.76 65 65 56NANANA 1059.13 99.420215 12:21 5 170 0.45 1.34 1.40 1059.11 65 65 56NANANA 1062.48 100.421220 12:26 4 173 0.30 0.89 0.93 1062.49 65 65 56NANANA 1065.24 99.822225 12:31 4.5 162 0.35 1.04 1.10 1065.23 65 65 54NANANA 1068.22 98.623230 12:36 4.5 173 0.30 0.90 0.93 1068.18 65 65 55NANANA 1070.93 99.424235 12:41 5 167 0.52 1.55 1.60 1070.91 65 65 55NANANA 1074.54 91.5240 12:461074.23Average 240168.4 0.36 1.05 1.10 143.303 61.9 62.6 58.1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!101.162.21CompanyJM- CleaburnSource DesignationL91-MBHTest Date1/24/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number0061-Run 2Condensate Volume (Vlc)12.3OperatorM.GillenSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)40.2Filter NumberNANozzle Diameter (in.)0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.10Leak Rate Initial0.006@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.004@13"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.808Pitot Tube NumberT6-5-2Meter Corr. Factor (Y)0.994Meter Number51-4Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.5Delta∆H@1.7O220Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 13:35 9 170 0.28 0.83 0.83 76.72 66 67 62NANANA79.39 101.225 13:40 9 176 0.26 0.77 0.77 79.42 66 67 58NANANA81.9899.5310 13:45 10 169 0.32 0.95 0.95 81.97 66 67 57NANANA84.8398.3415 13:50 10 169 0.46 1.37 1.35 84.78 66 67 57NANANA88.2197.3520 13:55 10 172 0.28 0.84 0.83 88.11 66 67 58NANANA90.7899.3625 14:00 10 174 0.26 0.78 0.77 90.76 67 67 60NANANA93.3395.4730 14:05 10 168 0.27 0.81 0.81 93.21 67 67 62NANANA95.8499.2835 14:10 10 176 0.30 0.90 0.89 95.82 67 68 60NANANA98.58 101.9940 14:15 10 169 0.42 1.26 1.25 98.63 67 68 55NANANA 101.91 97.01045 14:20 10 169 0.47 1.41 1.40 101.81 67 68 55NANANA 105.28 95.51150 14:25 10 173 0.32 0.96 0.96 105.12 67 68 55NANANA 107.98 97.11255 14:30 10 175 0.35 1.05 1.05 107.89 67 68 56NANANA 110.87 98.31360 14:35 10 168 0.32 0.97 0.96 110.82 67 68 58NANANA 113.69 99.11465 14:40 10 175 0.28 0.85 0.84 113.66 67 68 58NANANA 116.33 95.31570 14:45 10 166 0.36 1.09 1.10 116.20 67 68 55NANANA 119.25 99.91675 14:50 10 167 0.49 1.48 1.50 119.24 66 68 55NANANA 122.79 99.41780 14:55 10 171 0.30 0.91 0.90 122.76 66 68 55NANANA 125.53 100.91885 15:00 10 172 0.38 1.15 1.15 125.55 66 68 57NANANA 128.66 97.51990 15:05 10 167 0.30 0.91 0.91 128.58 66 68 57NANANA 131.36 99.52095 15:10 10 170 0.31 0.94 0.94 131.34 66 68 55NANANA 134.15 98.521100 15:15 10 166 0.47 1.43 1.40 134.11 66 68 55NANANA 137.59 101.122105 15:20 10 168 0.49 1.49 1.50 137.62 66 68 55NANANA 141.16 98.123110 15:25 10 172 0.29 0.89 0.88 141.09 66 67 57NANANA 143.81 103.924115 15:30 10 175 0.24 0.73 0.73 143.91 66 67 56NANANA 146.37 104.0120 15:35146.471120 15:45 10 155 0.31 0.95 0.95 147.13 66 67 54NANANA 149.98 93.12125 15:50 10 161 0.43 1.32 1.30 149.78 66 67 52NANANA 153.12 99.73130 15:55 10 159 0.26 0.80 0.80 153.10 65 67 49NANANA 155.70 103.74135 16:00 10 157 0.32 0.98 0.98 155.79 65 67 48NANANA 158.67 98.25140 16:05 10 165 0.28 0.86 0.86 158.62 65 67 50NANANA 161.30 99.66145 16:10 10 170 0.29 0.89 0.89 161.29 65 67 50NANANA 164.01 102.77150 16:15 10 166 0.39 1.20 1.20 164.08 65 67 50NANANA 167.24 101.78155 16:20 10 165 0.47 1.45 1.45 167.29 65 67 50NANANA 170.76 98.99160 16:25 10 170 0.31 0.96 0.96 170.72 65 66 51NANANA 173.53 99.110165 16:30 10 173 0.29 0.90 0.90 173.50 65 66 52NANANA 176.21 99.411170 16:35 10 169 0.31 0.96 0.96 176.19 65 66 55NANANA 179.00 100.512175 16:40 10 165 0.42 1.30 1.30 179.01 65 66 55NANANA 182.29 97.413180 16:45 10 162 0.28 0.87 0.87 182.20 64 66 56NANANA 184.88 100.714185 16:50 10 164 0.43 1.34 1.35 184.90 64 66 56NANANA 188.22 99.915190 16:55 10 165 0.26 0.81 0.81 188.21 64 66 58NANANA 190.79 99.716195 17:00 10 167 0.29 0.90 0.90 190.78 63 65 58NANANA 193.49 101.017200 17:05 10 166 0.26 0.81 0.81 193.52 63 65 57NANANA 196.09 101.518205 17:10 10 172 0.29 0.91 0.90 196.13 63 65 58NANANA 198.83 101.119210 17:15 10 165 0.37 1.16 1.15 198.86 63 65 56NANANA 201.93 98.520215 17:20 10 163 0.29 0.91 0.91 201.88 63 65 56NANANA 204.60 101.121220 17:25 10 163 0.31 0.97 0.97 204.63 63 65 55NANANA 207.44 98.822225 17:30 10 166 0.32 1.00 1.00 207.41 63 65 55NANANA 210.26 100.723230 17:35 10 161 0.29 0.91 0.91 210.28 63 65 54NANANA 213.01 101.324235 17:40 10 163 0.32 1.01 1.00 213.04 63 65 55NANANA 215.90 101.5240 17:45215.94Average 240167.7 0.33 1.02 1.02 138.565 65 67 55 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!99.566.05CompanyJM- CleaburnSource DesignationL91-MBHTest Date1/25/2012Assumed Moisture (Bws)2Test Number0061-Run 3Condensate Volume (Vlc)27.5OperatorM.GillenSilica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc)38.6Filter NumberNANozzle Diameter (in.)0.253Barometric Pressure (Pb)29.10Leak Rate Initial0.002@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps)-17.8Leak Rate Final0.003@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.)52Traverse points16*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.)Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp)0.808Pitot Tube NumberT6-5-2Meter Corr. Factor (Y)0.994Meter Number51-4Fyrite Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso)CO20.1Delta∆H@1.7O220.2Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres.Desired Orifice Orifice Sample VolumeDry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit Expected IsokineticPoint (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature DGM VariationNumber ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts∆Ps ("H2O)∆H ("H2O)∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F)(F)(F)(F) (cubic feet) %10 7:30 6 136 0.28 0.85 0.86 238.80 54 57 49NANANA 241.49 98.925 7:35 5 139 0.26 0.79 0.80 241.46 54 57 47NANANA 244.05 101.2310 7:40 5 131 0.33 1.01 1.00 244.08 55 57 47NANANA 247.02 101.5415 7:45 5 132 0.39 1.19 1.20 247.06 55 57 47NANANA 250.25 100.7520 7:50 5 134 0.32 0.98 0.99 250.27 55 57 48NANANA 253.16 98.5625 7:55 5 137 0.39 1.19 1.20 253.11 55 57 48NANANA 256.29 98.6730 8:00 5 135 0.28 0.85 0.87 256.24 55 57 49NANANA 258.94 98.6835 8:05 5 137 0.27 0.82 0.84 258.90 55 57 50NANANA 261.54 99.1940 8:10 5 139 0.34 1.04 1.05 261.52 55 57 50NANANA 264.48 98.61045 8:15 5 132 0.28 0.85 0.87 264.44 56 57 49NANANA 267.15 99.41150 8:20 6 146 0.37 1.13 1.15 267.13 56 57 50NANANA 270.20 98.91255 8:25 6 139 0.44 1.34 1.35 270.17 56 58 50NANANA 273.55 99.11360 8:30 6 138 0.40 1.22 1.25 273.51 56 58 52NANANA 276.73 100.71465 8:35 6 144 0.31 0.95 0.96 276.75 56 58 50NANANA 279.57 97.81570 8:40 6 147 0.36 1.10 1.10 279.51 56 58 50NANANA 282.54 101.61675 8:45 6.5 144 0.34 1.04 1.05 282.59 57 58 50NANANA 285.55 99.81780 8:50 6.5 137 0.42 1.28 1.30 285.54 57 58 50NANANA 288.85 102.01885 8:55 6.5 138 0.51 1.56 1.60 288.91 57 58 52NANANA 292.55 101.01990 9:00 6.5 137 0.35 1.07 1.10 292.58 56 58 53NANANA 295.60 101.22095 9:05 6.5 142 0.31 0.95 0.97 295.63 56 28 52NANANA 298.37 99.121100 9:10 6 142 0.30 0.92 0.94 298.35 56 58 51NANANA 301.13 100.722105 9:15 6 138 0.31 0.95 0.97 301.15 56 58 51NANANA 303.99 100.923110 9:20 6 136 0.54 1.65 1.70 304.01 57 58 51NANANA 307.76 99.624115 9:25 6.5 137 0.51 1.56 1.60 307.74 57 58 51NANANA 311.38 99.6120 9:30311.361120 9:43 6.5 138 0.27 0.82 0.85 311.91 59 59 49NANANA 314.57 97.12125 9:48 5 148 0.28 0.85 0.88 314.49 58 59 50NANANA 317.17 101.53130 9:53 6 141 0.51 1.56 1.60 317.21 58 59 50NANANA 320.85 99.44135 9:58 6 143 0.46 1.40 1.45 320.82 59 60 53NANANA 324.28 100.55140 10:03 6 148 0.28 0.85 0.88 324.29 59 60 53NANANA 326.98 99.86145 10:08 6 150 0.27 0.82 0.85 326.97 59 60 54NANANA 329.60 101.47150 10:13 6 140 0.28 0.85 0.89 329.64 59 60 53NANANA 332.34 98.88155 10:18 6 149 0.26 0.79 0.82 332.31 59 60 54NANANA 334.90 100.99160 10:23 5 143 0.47 1.43 1.50 334.92 60 61 54NANANA 338.42 102.710165 10:28 6 143 0.48 1.47 1.50 338.51 60 61 55NANANA 342.05 98.211170 10:33 6.5 148 0.30 0.92 0.95 341.98 60 61 56NANANA 344.77 100.912175 10:38 6 152 0.28 0.85 0.89 344.79 61 62 55NANANA 347.48 101.213180 10:43 6 147 0.32 0.98 1.00 347.51 61 62 55NANANA 350.39 100.614185 10:48 6 151 0.29 0.89 0.92 350.41 61 62 55NANANA 353.15 101.915190 10:53 6 142 0.52 1.59 1.65 353.20 61 62 55NANANA 356.89 99.916195 10:58 6 145 0.51 1.56 1.65 356.88 61 62 56NANANA 360.53 99.417200 11:03 6 145 0.32 0.98 1.00 360.50 61 62 57NANANA 363.39 101.818205 11:08 6 145 0.38 1.17 1.20 363.44 62 63 57NANANA 366.59 101.219210 11:13 6 145 0.35 1.08 1.10 366.63 62 63 58NANANA 369.66 98.220215 11:18 6 150 0.36 1.11 1.15 369.60 61 63 57NANANA 372.65 100.221220 11:23 6 148 0.50 1.54 1.60 372.66 61 63 58NANANA 376.27 100.622225 11:28 6 150 0.46 1.42 1.50 376.28 61 63 58NANANA 379.73 99.223230 11:33 6 153 0.33 1.02 1.05 379.70 61 63 58NANANA 382.62 99.824235 11:38 6.5 159 0.29 0.90 0.93 382.61 61 63 58NANANA 385.33 99.8240 11:43385.33Average 240142.5 0.36 1.11 1.14 145.981 58.0 58.8 52.4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!100.058.41

# Appendix B

Process Data

# Appendix C

Equipment Calibration Documents

# Appendix D

Laboratory Analytical ResultsAcetoneRinseVolume(mL)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)ParticulateWeight onFilter (mg)ParticulateWeight inAcetoneRinse (mg)CombinedParticulateWeight(mg)Run 192 4.0 0.06 4.04.3Run 282 1.7 0.06 1.72.0Run 389 5.7 0.06 5.76.0Blank72 0.2 0.06Note:Run detection limits of 0.3 mgon the filter were used inplaceof the corrected values listed aboveMethod 5 PM Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.02Cleburne, TexasJohns ManvilleCompound/FractionBlankFilterResult(μg)BlankFilterDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit(μg)FilterblankCorrectionAcetoneBlankCorrectionRun 1(μg)Run 2(μg)Run 3(μg)Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 1.16 0.15 3.15 1.76 2.76 0.15 1.16 0.001.99 0.60 1.60Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 1.46 0.30 1.64 1.85 2.17 0.60 1.46 0.000.60 0.60 0.71Note:For Runs 1 and 2, the test run detection limit of 0.6 μg was used for the front half result.Johns ManvilleMethod 29 Lab ResultsCorrectedSampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.02Cleburne, TexasCorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)HexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg] RDLHexavalentChromium,Cr6+ [μg]Run 18156152.30 0.301.68Run 27395493.30 0.302.75Run 385469453.00 2.0052.30Blank KOH2990.30 0.20CorrectedTotal Volume(ml)ImpingerKOH (ml)Back HalfChromium(μg)Back HalfRDLRinseChromium(μg)RinseRDLTotalChromium,Cr [μg]Run 18156152.004.00 1.00 1.005.00Run 27395492.003.00 8.00 1.0011.00Run 3854694190.004.00 31.00 0.90221.00Blank KOH2991.00 2.00 0.50 1.00Method 0061 Lab ResultsSampling Date: January 24 and 25, 2012BTEC job #11-4191.02Cleburne, TexasJohns Manville

# Your Project #: 12-41

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/08



# CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B212459

Received: 2012/01/26, 12:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) 4 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 BRL SOP-00103 / BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) 4 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) 4 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) 4 N/A 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00109

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.



# Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX



# RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M I 9 8 8 1 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 3 M I 9 8 8 4

Sampling Date 2012/01/25 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/25

14:10 14:10

U n i t s FIELD RUN 1-M5/29 RUN 2-M5/29 RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 0.2 J 4.0 1.7 2.0 0.5 2748217

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.060 U 0.30 2748215

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 72 92 82 89 1 2748218

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX



# ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M I 9 8 8 1 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 2 M I 9 8 8 3 M I 9 8 8 4

Sampling Date 2012/01/25 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/25

14:10 14:10 14:10

U n i t s FIELD RDL RUN 1-M5/29 RUN RUN 2-M5/29 RUN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-M5/29 1-M5/29 Lab-Dup 3-M5/29

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.16 0.15 3.15 3.18 1.76 2.76 0.15 2753940

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.46 0.30 1.64 1.60 1.85 2.17 0.60 2756471

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9881 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID FIELD BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9882 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9882 D u p Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/03 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Maxxam ID MI9883 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Maxxam ID MI9884 Collected 2012/01/25

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2753940 2012/02/02 2012/02/03 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2756471 2012/02/06 2012/02/06 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2748217 2012/01/27 2012/02/06 BRENDA MOORE

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2748215 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2748218 N/A 2012/02/01 BRENDA MOORE

Page 4 of 7

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212459 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201): Sample MI9882-02 is oily in appearance.

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020): Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MI9882.

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except MI9881, due to the matrix

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample MI9882.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7

# BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 12-41

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE, TX



# Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB212459

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2748217 RSU Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2012/02/06 0.1 J, MDL=0.1 mg

2753940 N_R Matrix Spike

(MI9882) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9882) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 97 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 2.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 100 % 85 - 115

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.4 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.113 J, MDL=0.070 ug

Method Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 0.099 J, MDL=0.070 ug

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/03 1.1 % 20

2756471 N_R Matrix Spike

(MI9882) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9882) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 103 % 85 - 115

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.7 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 0.10 U, MDL=0.10 ug

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/06 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 7

# Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B212459

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 7 of 7

# Your Project #: 12-41

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, MI

USA 48073

Report Date: 2012/02/08



# CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B212412

Received: 2012/01/26, 12:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 5

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Chromium in Impinger by ICP 5 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061

SOP-00102

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP 4 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061

SOP-00102

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2012/02/01

Final Volume of Train Rinse 4 N/A 2012/02/01

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.



# Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX



# RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 7 8 M I 9 4 7 9 M I 9 4 8 0 M I 9 4 8 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

17:30 17:30 15:50 15:50

U n i t s BLANK-M0061 BLANK RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 Lab-Dup

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 299 413 1 615 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 240 1 200 1 2751517

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.3 0.03 U 0.2 2.3 2.3 0.3 2752200

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 8 1 M I 9 4 8 2

Sampling Date 2012/01/24

19:25

U n i t s RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 549 1 694 1 2751510

Rinse Volume ml 190 1 160 1 2751517

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 3.3 0.3 53 2 2752200

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX



# ELEMENTS BY ICP-AES (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 7 8 M I 9 4 7 9 M I 9 4 8 0 M I 9 4 8 0

Sampling Date 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24 2012/01/24

17:30 17:30 15:50 15:50

U n i t s BLANK-M0061 BLANK RDL RUN 1-M0061 RUN 1-M0061 RDL QC Batch

H20-M0061 Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 1 U 2 2 U 2 U 4 2751507

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 0.5 U 1 1 1 1 2751508

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID M I 9 4 8 1 M I 9 4 8 2

Sampling Date 2012/01/24

19:25

U n i t s RUN 2-M0061 RDL RUN RDL QC Batch

3-M0061

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 2 J 3 190 4 2751507

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 8 1 31 0.9 2751508

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9478 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID BLANK-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9479 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID BLANK H20-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9480 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID MI9480 D u p Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Maxxam ID MI9481 Collected 2012/01/24

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Page 4 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX



# Test Summary

Maxxam ID MI9482 Collected

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/01/26

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2752200 2012/02/01 2012/02/01 LANG LE

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2751507 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2751508 2012/01/31 2012/02/01 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2751510 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2751517 N/A 2012/02/01 FRANK MO

Page 5 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B212412 Client Project #: 12-41

Report Date: 2012/02/08 Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 8

# BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 12-41

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM LINE 91 BAGHOUSE STACK - CLEBURNE,TX



# Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB212412

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2751507 SUK Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 95 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9480) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 95 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/02 100 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 100 % 90 - 110

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.2 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 NC % 20

2751508 SUK Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 102 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(MI9480) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 103 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 100 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 102 % 90 - 110

RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 1.1 % 20

Method Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2012/02/01 NC % 20

2752200 LLE Matrix Spike

(MI9480) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 103 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 98 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 0.03 U, MDL=0.03 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2012/02/01 3.6 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 8

# Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B212412

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 8 of 8