alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TRIBAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

P.O. BOX 305 • LAPWAI, IDAHO 83540 • (208) 843-2253 

13 November 2015 

Docket Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, Room W12-140 

West Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590-001 

Re: Amendment to Nez Perce Tribe's July 28, 2015 Petition (FAA-2015-4929-0001) 

for a Summary Grant of an Expedited Sectio·n 333 Exemption to Operate Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems for Aerial Data Collection 

Dear Sir of Madam: 

The Nez Perce Tribe respectfully amends its July 28,2015 petition (FAA-2015-4929-0001) for a 

summary grant of an expedited exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations (F ARs ), pursuant 

to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization Act of2012 and 14 CFR Part 11 , to operate small 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) for aerial data collection to add the following sUAS: 

* DJI Phantom Professional 3. 

As set forth in the Tribe's July 28,2015 petition, the Tribe's use ofs UAS for aerial data 

collection will assist the Tribe in carrying out functions including biological, fisheries, wildlife, 

land, forestry, environmental and natural resources research, monitoring, and management. 

The FAA has granted numerous summary grants of exemptions for the DJI Phantom 

Professional 3 sUAS that the Tribe intends to use 1 and the operations the Tribe intends to 

conduct (aerial data collection for environmental monitoring and wildlife conservation). 

Please contact David J. Cummings in the Tribe's Office of Legal Counsel (208.843.7355) or me 

if you have any questions concerning this amendment to the Tribe's petition. 

Sincerely, 

t;~,#.9~ 

Anthor{1 D, Johnson 

Chairman 

1 For' example, the FAA has granted exemptions to use the DJI Phantom Professional 3 sUAS in Grants of 

Exemption #12073 (FAA-2015-1367); #12037 (FAA-20 15-1431); #12603 (FAA-2015-1087); #12425 (FA.A-2015-

1968).
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1343 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise its rules so 

as to increase the threshold amount for requiring issuers to provide 

certain disclosures relating to compensatory benefit plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. HULTGREN (for himself, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. STIVERS, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. 

HIGGINS of New York, and Mr. MACARTHUR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

its rules so as to increase the threshold amount for 

requiring issuers to provide certain disclosures relating 

to compensatory benefit plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Encouraging Employee 

5 Ownership Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1343 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED THRESHOLD FOR DISCLOSURES RELAT2 ING TO COMPENSATORY BENEFIT PLANS. 

3 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 

5 shall revise section 230.701(e) of title 17, Code of Federal 

6 Regulations, so as to increase from $5,000,000 to 

7 $10,000,000 the aggregate sales price or amount of secu8 rities sold during any consecutive 12-month period in ex9 cess of which the issuer is required under such section to 

10 deliver an additional disclosure to investors. The Commis11 sion shall index for inflation such aggregate sales price 

12 or amount every 5 years to reflect the change in the Con13 sumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by 

14 the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rounding to the nearest 

15 $1,000,000. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1153 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the definitions provided 

for points and fees in connection with a mortgage transaction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. HUIZENGA (for himself, Mr. ROYCE of California, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of 

Georgia, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. MEEKS, and Mr. JOYCE of Ohio) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

5 of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1153 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

5 ‘‘taxes’’; 

6 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

7 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

8 of their participation in an affiliated business 

9 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

10 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

11 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

12 and 

13 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

14 the following: 

15 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

16 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party charge 

17 not retained by the mortgage originator, 

18 creditor, or an affiliate of the creditor or 

19 mortgage originator; or 

20 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

21 106(e)(1);’’; and 

22 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

23 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in25 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1153 IH

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec2 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

5 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi6 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

8 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi9 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

10 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

11 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

12 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

13 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final regula14 tions to carry out the amendments made by this Act, and 

15 such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ex_206440.htm


Exhibit 10.7


 


 


October 6, 2020


 


 


Jennifer Kretchmar


 


 


Re:     Consent to Reduced 2020 Target Bonus Opportunity


 


Reference is made to that certain Employment, Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement that you entered into with Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of March 7, 2016, as amended (the “Agreement”). Section 3(b) of the Agreement provides in part:


 


Should Company meet or exceed the sales, profits and other objectives established by the Compensation Committee for any fiscal year, Employee shall be eligible to receive a bonus for such fiscal year in the amount as determined by the Compensation Committee; provided however, the target bonus opportunity established for Employee in any given fiscal year will be set by the Compensation Committee at not less than fifty percent (50%) of Employee’s earned annual base pay for such fiscal year.


 


In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has requested that you agree to a reduced target bonus opportunity of 30% of your Eligible Quarterly Earnings (as defined in the Fiscal 2020 Performance Objectives For C-Level Employees) for each fiscal quarter of 2020. Consent to this adjustment is requested for fiscal 2020 only.


 


Please sign below to acknowledge and give your consent to this change to your target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


	 	
			Sincerely,


			 


			BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP, INC.


			 


			/s/ Eric Fencl


			 


			Eric Fencl


			Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel


			and Secretary

			



 


 


As described in this letter, I consent to the change to my target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


 


/s/ Jennifer Kretchmar                  


Jennifer Kretchmar


 


 


Date:      October 6, 2020
#### Athos, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*May 4*

June *4, 1929.*

*Omar T. McMahon*of Milwaukee, for the plaintiff in error.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, George A. Bowman,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *George B. Skogmo*and *Louis S. Wiener,*assistant district attorneys, and oral argument by *Mr. Skogmo.*

*229Owen, J.

Defendant’s main contention is that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. The complaining witness, a girl fifteen years of age, testified that the defendant had sexual intercourse with her at the home of her parents, at about ten o’clock Sunday morning, November 18-, 1928, and that he had had intercourse with her eight times between August and November. A younger sister of the complaining witness testified that she saw the defendant leaving the house upon the Sunday in question. It is admitted by the defendant that when the complaining witness discovered that she was pregnant she went to see the defendant about it; The defendant denies that he had intercourse with her at the time in question or any other time.

There is nothing extraordinary about this state of the evidence. Convictions upon this kind of evidence have been sustained upon innumerable occasions. There is nothing incredible about the testimony of the complaining witness. It does not bear upon its face evidence of its unreliability. Upon various points the defendant’s testimony was contradicted by three or four witnesses. Either he or such other witnesses testified falsely. Under such circumstances the jury declined to believe his testimony. We see no reason for disturbing their verdict.

The complaining witness, her sister,-and her father and mother testified that she was fifteen years of age. Defendant insists that this testimony should be disregarded, because they were unable to testify as to the year in which complaining witness was born. It was a Greek and uneducated family. The fact that upon cross-examination they were unable to state the year in which the complaining witness was born, cannot be held to destroy their testimony that she was fifteen years of age.

It is further insisted that there was no proof of penetration. This essential element of the crime of rape was not brought out specifically and with particularity. The com*230plaining witness, however, testified that defendant had sexual intercourse with her. That she understood the nature of the completed act of sexual intercourse ’plainly appears from the fact that she had a ruptured hymen and that she was pregnant. The latter fact is conclusive that she had had sexual intercourse with some one. The completed act of sexual intercourse involves penetration to the extent necessary to constitute the crime of rape. When one of understanding testifies to a completed act of sexual intercourse it is sufficient proof of penetration. *Bailey v. Comm. 82*Va. 107.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Manuel Carrasco, Petitioner, v George Bartlett, as Superintendent of the Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 91]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from assaulting others when he was seen punching his wife during a visit at the prison. Petitioner argues that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. We disagree. Initially, the misbehavior report contained a correction officer’s description of petitioner’s wife with a cut and swollen lip and right cheek, along with her statement to him that petitioner was upset with her because she was late. In addition, a memorandum prepared by another correction officer indicated that petitioner’s wife admitted to him that petitioner had struck her. This evidence, coupled with the statements of confidential eyewitnesses who saw petitioner punch his wife in the face during the visit, provides substantial evidence supporting respondent’s determination.

*748Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 104 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1135 

[Report No. 115–157] 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Historic 

Preservation program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. CLYBURN (for himself, Mr. RICHMOND, Ms. ADAMS, Ms. BASS, Mrs. 

BEATTY, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. BROWN

of Maryland, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 

CLEAVER, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. EVANS, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. AL

GREEN of Texas, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. JEFFRIES, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, 

Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Ms. LEE, Ms. JACKSON LEE, 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MOORE, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. THOMPSON

of Mississippi, Mr. VEASEY, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. WILSON of 

Florida, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mrs. LOVE, and Ms. MAXINE

WATERS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

JUNE 2, 2017 

Additional sponsor: Mr. HIMES

JUNE 2, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1135 RH

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and 

Universities Historic Preservation program. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1135 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVER4 SITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM 

5 REAUTHORIZED. 

6 Section 507(d)(2) of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

7 Lands Management Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 302101 note) 

8 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

9 ‘‘and each of fiscal years 2018 through 2024.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 104 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1135 

[Report No. 115–157] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and 

Universities Historic Preservation program. 

JUNE 2, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 38 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 38

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known 
                     as the Stream Protection Rule.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
Enforcement of the Department of the Interior relating to the ``Stream

              

 Protection Rule'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 93066 (December 20, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3rd Medical Battalion Participates in Navy Medicine Augmentation Program Training

By Pfc. Terry Wong3rd Marine Logistics Group

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 7th Fleet Staff Join 12th Marine Regiment for Live Fire Exercise

By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Aron MontanoU.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs Office

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-A,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,304
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  40,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41,389
<PP&E>                                         2,989,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,193,019)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 837,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,615
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   837,813
<SALES>                                        35,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,397
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,688<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IBRAHIM M. LY,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL

BOARD (STAFF MANAGEMENT),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 150 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of December

, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.