alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1. Job Set−Up Subtask 27−34−01−010−004 A. Open the access panels that follow: B. REFERENCE DESIGNATION

332AT Access Panel 332BT Access Panel 332CT Access Panel 332DB Access Panel 332EB Access Panel 342AT Access Panel MAINTENANCE TASK CARD MANUAL 000−27−900−710
MECH Rev 24 Jun 05/2011 FNC 2.50 12,000 FH 333, 343ALL
**Functional Check of the Elevator Free Play**

273000−213 AMM TASK 27−34−01−720−801



# 000−27−900−710 Page 1 of 3 Rev 24 Jun 05/2011 Aircraft Serial Number Aircraft Series Task Card Number Component EffectivityS/N OFF: S/N ON: Aircraft Hours CyclesAirline Designator Code Skill Task Card Revision Work Order Task Type Man Hours Interval Zone(s) Aircraft Effectivity

TASK DESCRIPTION:

MRM TASK NUMBER: REFERENCE (S):REFERENCE DESIGNATION 342BT Access Panel 342CT Access Panel 342DB Access Panel 342EB Access Panel 2. Procedure Subtask 27−34−01−720−001 A. Do the functional check of the elevator free play (Refer to AMM TASK 27−34−01−700− 801). 3. Close Out Subtask 27−34−01−941−004 A. Remove all tools, equipment and unwanted materials from the work area. Subtask 27−34−01−410−003 B. Close the access panels that follow: C. REFERENCE DESIGNATION

332AT Access Panel 332BT Access Panel 332CT Access Panel 332DB Access Panel 332EB Access Panel 342AT Access Panel 342BT Access Panel 342CT Access Panel 342DB Access Panel 342EB Access Panel MAINTENANCE TASK CARD MANUAL



# 000−27−900−710 Page 2 of 3 Rev 24 Jun 05/2011MAINTENANCE TASK CARD MANUAL

Yes No Details: **Task Completion Sign Off** NAME (Print) DATE SIGNATURE **MECHANIC INSPECTOR**  (if required): MCO Item moved to: Date: Total Man Hours: **FINDINGS**bru17a.dg, pt, 04/06/00



# 000−27−900−710 Page 3 of 3 Rev 24 Jun 05/2011
January 16, 2009 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H387 

By Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, 

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

CLYBURN, Mr. NADLER of New York, 

Mr. WATT, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WEINER, 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. MOORE

of Kansas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. 

SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. MEEKS of New 

York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. BARROW, Mr. 

FILNER, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. ROSS, Mr. 

MARKEY of Massachusetts, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. MASSA, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

PERRIELLO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. BISHOP of 

Georgia, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. KENNEDY, 

Mr. DRIEHAUS, Mr. HARE, Mr. PETERS, 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. 

MORAN of Virginia, and Mr. PLATTS): 

H. Res. 73. A resolution observing the 

birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., and encouraging the people of the United States to 

observe the birthday of Martin Luther King, 

Jr., and the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and for other purposes; to the 

Committee on the Judiciary. 

f 

ADDITIONAL SPONSORS 

Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors 

were added to public bills and resolutions as follows: 

H.R. 156: Mr. ROE of Tennessee. 

H.R. 205: Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, 

Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. AKIN, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, and Mr. LINDER. 

H.R. 333: Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. FILNER. 

H.R. 460: Ms. HIRONO, Mr. STARK, Mr. CROWLEY, and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. 

H.R. 546: Mrs. BONO MACK. 

H. Res. 39: Mr. KING of New York, Ms. 

DELAURO, and Mr. WOLF. 

H. Res. 49: Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of 

Texas, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. 

BACA, Mr. COHEN, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. STARK, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, and Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of 

California. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with HOUSE
#### In re Ronald R. FONTAINE, Debtor. Kathleen Ruth NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. Ronald R. FONTAINE, Debtor, Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 8000842.

Adv. No. 810013.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.

Sept. 11, 1981.

*11Robert Oster, Oster, Groff & Prescott, Lincoln, R.I., for plaintiff.

David C. Moretti, Jeffrey S. Perlow, Law Offices of David C. Moretti, Cranston, R.I., for defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT TO HAVE DEBT DETERMINED TO BE NONDISCHARGEABLE

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Heard on the Plaintiff’s complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt owed by the Debtor to Industrial National Bank. The issue in this case is whether an order of the Rhode Island Family Court requiring the Defendant to pay a loan owed jointly by him and his then wife constitutes alimony, support or maintenance under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(5), 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).

The Plaintiff and the Defendant were married in October, 1978, separated in April, 1979, and were granted a final decree of divorce on November 30, 1979 (a total of 13 months). According to the terms of a consent decree, the Defendant was ordered to pay an outstanding loan to Industrial National Bank, on which the Plaintiff and Defendant were both obligated. The decree also provides that both parties waived “any and all rights of alimony.” Both parties were represented by counsel in Rhode Island Family Court. The Defendant filed a Chapter 7, 11 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., bankruptcy petition with this Court in November, 1980. Realizing that if her former husband’s debt to the Bank was discharged she would be solely liable on the loan, the Plaintiff filed the instant complaint seeking a determination that the Defendant’s payments on the loan were in the nature of alimony, maintenance, and support, and therefore nondischargeable pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(5), 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).

The party contesting the dischargeability of a debt bears the burden of proof. *Hill v. Smith,*260 U.S. 592, 43 S.Ct. 219, 67 L.Ed. 419 (1923); *Public Finance Corp. v. Walker,*7 B.R. 216 (Bkrtcy.D.R.I.1980). The parties lived together as hus band and wife for only six months, they have no children, and most importantly, the Plaintiff, with the advice of counsel, consented to a decree waiving “any and all rights of alimony.” The Plaintiff has not produced any evidence to rebut the strong inference in this case that the Family Court order requiring the Defendant to pay the loan in question was not intended to be in the nature of alimony.

The debt in question is discharged. Judgment should be entered for the Defendant.
THERMACELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                    Computation of Loss Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           For the Three Months Ended               For the Nine Months Ended
                                                                    June 30,                                 June 30,
                                                        ----------------------------------      -----------------------------------
                                                             1998               1997                 1998               1997
                                                        ---------------    ---------------      ----------------   ----------------
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Shares  outstanding:                                         4,245,021          2,859,551             4,245,021          2,859,550
Weighted average shares outstanding w/o options              3,902,338          2,859,551             3,181,202          1,745,345
Incremental shares attributed to outstanding options           700,000                  -               350,000                  -
Weighted average number of shares repurchased                 (448,718)                 -               (98,718)                 -
                                                        ---------------    ---------------      ----------------   ----------------
Weighted average shares outstanding                          4,153,620          2,859,551             3,432,484          1,745,345
Net loss                                              $       (111,685)  $       (282,610)    $        (271,842) $        (866,104)
 
Net loss per share                                    $         (0.03)   $          (0.10)    $           (0.08) $           (0.50)

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                       Cancer Capital Corp.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned officer of Cancer Capital Corp. certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.


                                       /s/ John W. Peters
Date:   March 12, 2004                ___________________________________
                                      John W. Peters
                                      Principal Executive and Financial
                                      Officer
No. 90-654.

#### Sheehan *v.*California.

App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., Alameda County. Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register: April 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 75)]
[Notices]               
[Page 20579]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap10-45]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0050]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete two systems of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete two systems of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
May 20, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics 
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, 
VA 22060-6221.
    The Agency proposes to delete two system of records notices in its 
inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletions are not within the 
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system 
report.

    Dated: April 14, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
    S900.10

System name:
    Personnel Roster/Locator Files (December 26, 2002; 67 FR 78780).

Reason:
    Records are now being maintained under a DoD-wide system of records 
identified as DPR 39 DoD, entitled ``DoD Personnel Accountability and 
Assessment System.
Deletion:
    S340.20 CAHS

System name:
    Official Records for Host Enrollee Programs (November 16, 2004; 69 
FR 67112).

Reason:
    System notice is no longer needed. The program has been 
discontinued and records have been destroyed.

[FR Doc. 2010-9004 Filed 4-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
/mb££i I

FILED IN

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

JUN 232015(1/^

lo-^e Si&fe o/1 T&&\'- Cour}

^7^_^^^/2/l^^Z^Z^7z SSe/n ^ H335tS^.

^P-e^oiL/fm^kn-^l^pOLSeJc&fa ce. ib /^gJ^JSas^

oL

-U&s us&ni

&.

as

Sol-L

£

a* A fe?) u-e^ troupe, ^ (as&<> /?& / rp/*<t</ied

y Ms*/-_f {'GofJr

Mi

(Ou (/? sicr

^^^^u^^x^^t^^c^Z

:^-

M4M^
|yP| KV

Wty

"received . FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAb

JUN 2 3 2015

CHRISTOPHER h. PHINE

ICLERK;

~? :-"0
**EXHIBIT 31.1**Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)I, Morris H. Wheeler, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cohesant Technologies Inc. (the“Company”), certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Companyas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.(4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
 

 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and(5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theCompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.   /s/ Morris H. Wheeler Morris H. Wheeler  Cohesant Technologies Inc.President and Chief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2007
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1809V

UNPUBLISHED

SUSAN LITTLE,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: January 21, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Uncontested; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Ronald Craig Homer, C onway, Homer, P.C., Bost on, MA, for petitioner.

Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Ju stice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On November 26, 2018, Susan Little fil ed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an in fluenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on October 3, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 21, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he states

that he does not contest that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “[i]t is

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Fe deral Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified mate rial fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 respondent’s position that petitioner has satisf ied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (‘Table’) and the Qualificati ons and Aids to Interp retation (‘QAI’).” Id. at 4.

In view of Respondent’s position a nd the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 226 (Tuesday, November 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73103-73104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29704]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1869; Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-9]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Newberry, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the legal description of a 
final rule published in the Federal Register of September 24, 2015, 
that establishes Class E airspace at the Newberry VHF Omni-Directional 
Range/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME), Newberry, MI. The legal 
description noted exclusionary language for Federal airways and 
Canadian airspace not required for this airspace.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, December 10, 2015. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
1 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, subject to the annual revision 
of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service 
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway., Fort Worth, TX 76177; 
telephone 817-222-5874.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On September 24, 2015, a final rule was published in the Federal 
Register establishing Class E airspace at the Newberry VOR/DME, 
Newberry, MI (80 FR 57522) Docket No. FAA-2015-1869. Subsequent to 
publication, the FAA found that the exclusionary language for Federal 
airways and Canadian airspace noted in the airspace description is not 
required and, therefore, is removed.

 Final Rule Correction

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the 
Federal Register of September 24, 2015, (80 FR 57522) FR Doc. 2015-
23987, on

[[Page 73104]]

page 57523, column 2, beginning on line 26, remove ``, excluding that 
airspace within Federal airways and within Canadian airspace''.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on November 10, 2015.
Robert W. Beck,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-29704 Filed 11-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 85-1551.

#### Karcher, Speaker of the New Jersey General Assembly, et al. *v.*May et al.

Appeal from C. A. 3d *1063Cir. Further consideration of question of jurisdiction postponed to hearing of case on the merits.
No. D-590.

#### In re Disbarment of Kazdoy.

[For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 958.]

Disbarment entered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LOTTOWORLD,  INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             876 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      482
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,281
<PP&E>                                             599  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     222   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,124
<BONDS>                                             13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,543 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,685
<SALES>                                            668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   668
<CGS>                                            1,415    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.62)

        

</TABLE>