45962 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of nonregulatory SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or nonattainment area 

State submittal date/ 

effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 1997 Fine Particulate Matter 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Tennessee .............. 12/14/2007 .............. 8/2/2012 [Insert citation of publication].

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 2006 Fine Particulate Matter 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Tennessee .............. 10/19/2009 .............. 8/2/2012 [Insert citation of publication].

[FR Doc. 2012–18797 Filed 8–1–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0194; FRL–9709–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of State 

Implementation Plans: Idaho; BoiseNorthern Ada County Air Quality 

Maintenance Area Second 10-Year 

Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of Idaho (the 

State). The Idaho State Department of 

Environmental Quality (IDEQ) 

submitted the Northern Ada County Air 

Quality Maintenance Area Second 10- 

year Carbon Monoxide Maintenance 

Plan on February 10, 2011. In 

accordance with the requirements of the 

Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), EPA is 

approving the revision because the State 

adequately demonstrates that the BoiseNorthern Ada County Air Quality 

Maintenance Area will maintain air 

quality standards for carbon monoxide 

(CO) through the year 2022. 

DATES: This rule is effective on October 

1, 2012, without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by 

September 4, 2012. If EPA receives 

adverse comment, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– 

OAR–2011–0194, by any of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: chi.john@epa.gov. 

• Mail: John Chi, U.S. EPA Region 10, 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT– 

107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, 

Seattle, WA 98101. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. EPA 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 

900, Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: John 

Chi, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, 

AWT—107. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2011– 

0194. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy 

during normal business hours at the 

Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, U.S. 

EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, 

Seattle, WA 98101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Chi at telephone number: (206) 553– 

1230, email address: chi.john@epa.gov, 

fax number: (206) 553–0110, or Claudia 

Vergnani Vaupel at telephone number: 

(206) 553–6121, email address: 

vaupel.claudia@epa.gov, or the above 

EPA, Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. Information is organized as 

follows: 

Table of Contents 

I. What is the purpose of this action? 

II. What is the background for this action? 

III. How have the public and stakeholders 

been involved in this rulemaking 

process? 

IV. Evaluation of Idaho’s Submittal 

V. Transportation and General Conformity 

VI. Final Action 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the purpose of this action? 

EPA is taking direct final action to 

approve the second 10-year CO 

maintenance plan for the Northern Ada 

County, Idaho Air Quality Maintenance 

Area. The Northern Ada County Area 

attained the CO national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS) in 2002 and 

has not violated the standard since 

1986. The second 10-year CO 

maintenance plan submitted by the 

State is designed to keep the Northern 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 45963 

Ada County Area in attainment for the 

CO standard for a second 10-year period 

beyond redesignation. 

II. What is the background for this 

action? 

Under section 107(d)(1)(C) of the Act, 

any area designated before the date of 

enactment of the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990 was to be 

designated upon enactment by 

operation of law. CO nonattainment 

areas that had not violated the CO 

standard in either year for the two-year 

period 1988–1989 were to be designated 

nonattainment and identified as ‘‘not 

classified’’ nonattainment areas. 

Accordingly, on November 6, 1991, the 

Boise-Northern Ada County Area was 

designated nonattainment for the CO 

NAAQS and identified as ‘‘notclassified’’ (56 FR 56746). 

On January 17, 2002, the State 

requested EPA redesignate the Northern 

Ada County nonattainment area to 

attainment and submitted a limited 

maintenance plan to demonstrate 

maintenance of the standard for a 10- 

year period. EPA published approval of 

the redesignation request and 

maintenance plan on October 28, 2002 

(67 FR 65713). The State submitted a 

second 10-year maintenance plan to 

EPA on February 10, 2011. 

The 8-hour CO standard is attained 

when the daily average 8-hour CO 

concentration of 9.0 parts per million 

(ppm) is not exceeded more than once 

a year. Since the redesignation of the 

Northern Ada County Area to 

attainment for CO on December 27, 

2002, the second highest concentration 

in any calendar year measured by the 

EPA approved monitoring network was 

3.3 ppm, which is less than 9.0 ppm. 

Therefore the area is attaining the CO 

NAAQS. 

In addition, areas that can 

demonstrate design values at or below 

7.65 ppm (85 percent of exceedance 

levels of the CO NAAQS) for 8 

consecutive quarters may use a limited 

maintenance plan option. The State has 

opted to develop a limited maintenance 

plan to fulfill the second 10-year 

maintenance plan required by the Act. 

The base year in the State’s second 10- 

year maintenance plan is 2008, which 

has a design value of 2.9 ppm. EPA 

reviewed air quality monitoring data 

(2010–2011) and the 8-hour CO design 

value for the Northern Ada County Area 

is 1.6 ppm. Thus, the area qualifies to 

use the limited maintenance plan 

option. 

III. How have the public and 

stakeholders been involved in this 

rulemaking process? 

Section 110(a)(2) of the Act requires 

that each SIP revision be adopted after 

reasonable notice and public hearing. 

This must occur prior to the revision 

being submitted by a State to EPA. The 

State of Idaho held a public hearing on 

January 26, 2011, in Boise, Idaho. A 

notice of public hearing was published 

in the Idaho Statesman on December 27, 

2010. A notice was also published in the 

Valley News on January 10, 2011. This 

SIP revision became State effective on 

February 10, 2011, and was submitted 

by the Governor’s designee to the EPA 

on February 10, 2011. EPA has 

evaluated the State’s submittal and 

determined that the State met the 

requirements for reasonable notice and 

public hearing under section 110(a)(2) 

of the Act. 

IV. Evaluation of Idaho’s Submittal 

EPA has reviewed the Northern Ada 

County second 10-year CO maintenance 

plan and concludes that the submittal 

meets the requirements of section 

175A(b) of the Act. The following is a 

summary of the requirements and EPA’s 

evaluation of how each requirement is 

met. 

A. Base Year Emissions Inventory 

The plan must contain an attainment 

year emissions inventory to identify a 

level of emissions in the area which is 

sufficient to attain the CO NAAQS. The 

Northern Ada County second 10-year 

CO maintenance plan contains an 

emissions inventory for the base year 

2008 that is consistent with EPA’s most 

recent guidance on maintenance plan 

emission inventories. The emissions 

inventory is a list, by source, of the air 

contaminants directly emitted into the 

Northern Ada County CO Area. The data 

in the emissions inventory is based on 

calculations and is developed using 

emission factors, which is a method for 

converting source activity levels into an 

estimate of emissions contributions for 

those sources. Because violations of the 

CO NAAQS are most like to occur on 

winter weekdays, the inventory 

prepared is in a ‘‘typical winter day’’ 

format. The table below shows the tons 

of CO emitted per winter day in 2008 by 

source category. 

2008 AVERAGE WINTER DAY CO 

EMISSION INVENTORY

Main source category 

CO Emissions 

tons per winter 

day 

Point Sources ....................... 0.5 

2008 AVERAGE WINTER DAY CO 

EMISSION INVENTORY—Continued 

Main source category 

CO Emissions 

tons per winter 

day 

Major Point Sources w/in 25 

miles .................................. 4.2 

Onroad Mobile Sources ........ 146.1 

Non-road Mobile Sources ..... 62.5 

Area Sources ........................ 49.7 

Biogenic ................................ 1.5 

Total ............................... 264.5 

B. Demonstration of Maintenance 

The maintenance plan demonstration 

requirement is considered to be satisfied 

for areas using the limited maintenance 

plan option, which are required to 

demonstrate design values at or below 

7.65 ppm (85 percent of exceedance 

levels of the CO NAAQS) for 8 

consecutive quarters. The State has 

opted to develop a limited maintenance 

plan to fulfill the Northern Ada County 

Area second 10-year maintenance plam 

required by the Act. 

With the limited maintenance plan 

option, there is no requirement to 

project emissions of air quality over the 

maintenance period. EPA believes that 

if the area begins the maintenance 

period at, or below, 85 percent of the 

level of the CO 8-hour NAAQS, the 

applicability of prevention of significant 

deterioration requirements, the control 

measures already in the SIP, and 

Federal measures, should provide 

adequate assurance of maintenance over 

the 10-year maintenance period. The 

last monitored violation of the CO 

NAAQS in the Northern Ada County 

Area occurred in 1986, the last 

exceedance was in January 1991, and 

the monitored CO levels have been 

steadily in decline ever since. The 8- 

hour CO design value for Northern Ada 

County is 1.6 ppm based on 2010–2011 

data, which is below the limited 

maintenance plan requirement of 7.65 

ppm. Therefore, the Northern Ada 

County Area has adequately 

demonstrated that it will maintain the 

CO NAAQS into the future. 

C. Monitoring Network and Verification 

of Continued Attainment 

To verify the attainment status of the 

area over the maintenance period, the 

maintenance plan should contain 

provisions for continued operation of an 

appropriate, EPA-approved monitoring 

network in accordance with 40 CFR part 

58. The State has an approved 

monitoring network that includes the 

Northern Ada County Area. The 

monitoring network was most recently 

approved by EPA on September 6, 2011. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
45964 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

In the Northern Ada County second 10- 

year CO maintenance plan, IDEQ 

commits to verify continued attainment 

through the EPA-approved monitoring 

network in accordance with 40 CFR part 

58. 

D. Contingency Plan 

Section 175A(d) of the Act requires 

that a maintenance plan include 

contingency provisions. The Northern 

Ada County second 10-year CO limited 

maintenance plan contains a 

contingency plan that would institute 

an oxygenated fuels program or another 

equivalent CO reduction measure based 

on the EPA’s guidance and 

recommendations. The contingency 

plan is triggered either when an 

exceedance of the 8 hour CO standard 

is recorded on any monitor, or when a 

monitor records non-overlapping 8 hour 

CO concentrations of 8 ppm on 4 or 

more days within a single winter season 

within the nonattainment area. EPA 

finds that the contingency measures 

provided in the maintenance plan are 

adequate to ensure prompt correction of 

a violation. 

V. Transportation and General 

Conformity 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Act. EPA’s 

conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, programs, and 

projects that are funded under 23 U.S.C. 

or the Federal Transit Act conform to 

SIPs. Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the NAAQS. 

The transportation conformity rule 

(40 CFR parts 51 and 93) and the general 

conformity rule (40 CFR parts 51 and 

93) apply to nonattainment areas and 

maintenance areas covered by an 

approved maintenance plan. Under 

either conformity rule, an acceptable 

method of demonstrating that a Federal 

action conforms to the applicable SIP is 

to demonstrate that expected emissions 

from the planned action are consistent 

with the emissions budget for the area. 

While EPA’s limited maintenance 

plan option does not exempt an area 

from the need to affirm conformity, it 

explains that the area may demonstrate 

conformity without submitting an 

emissions budget. Under the limited 

maintenance plan option, emissions 

budgets are treated as essentially not 

constraining for the length of the 

maintenance period because it is 

unreasonable to expect that the 

qualifying areas would experience so 

much growth in that period that a 

violation of the CO NAAQS would 

result. Similarly, Federal actions subject 

to the general conformity rule could be 

considered to satisfy the ‘‘budget test’’ 

specified in section 93.158(a)(5)(i)(A) for 

the same reasons that the budgets are 

essentially considered to be unlimited. 

While areas with maintenance plans 

approved under the limited 

maintenance plan option are not subject 

to the budget test, the areas remain 

subject to other transportation 

conformity requirements of 40 CFR part 

93, subpart A. Thus, the metropolitan 

planning organization (MPO) in the area 

or the State must document and ensure 

that: 

a. Transportation plans and projects 

provide for timely implementation of 

SIP transportation control measures in 

accordance with 40 CFR 93.113; 

b. Transportation plans and projects 

comply with the fiscal constraint 

element per 40 CFR 93.108; 

c. The MPO’s interagency 

consultation procedures meet applicable 

requirements of 40 CFR 93.105; 

d. Conformity of transportation plans 

is determined no less frequently than 

every four years, and conformity of plan 

amendments and transportation projects 

is demonstrated in accordance with the 

timing requirements specified in 40 CFR 

93.104; 

e. The latest planning assumptions 

and emissions model are used as set 

forth in 40 CFR 93.110 and 40 CFR 

93.111; 

f. Projects do not cause or contribute 

to any new localized CO or particulate 

matter violations, in accordance with 

procedures specified in 40 CFR 93.123; 

and 

g. Project sponsors and/or operators 

provide written commitments as 

specified in 40 CFR 93.125. 

The lead transportation agency in 

Northern Ada County is the Community 

Planning Association of Southwest 

Idaho (COMPASS), the MPO. 

COMPASS oversees transportation 

conformity determinations of the 

Interagency Consultation Committee 

established in Idaho Administrative 

Rule IDAPA 58.01.01.567, which 

includes IDEQ, the Idaho Transportation 

Department, the Federal Highway 

Administration, Ada County Highway 

District, the City of Boise, Valley 

Regional Transit, and the EPA; as 

specified under 40 CFR part 93. 

Northern Ada County is currently 

meeting the requirements under 40 CFR 

part 93, subpart A. 

VI. Final Action 

In accordance with the requirements 

of the Act, EPA is approving this 

revision to the SIP because the State 

adequately demonstrates that the 

Northern Ada County Air Quality 

Maintenance Area will maintain air 

quality standards for CO through the 

year 2022. EPA is publishing this action 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

amendment and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should adverse comments be filed. This 

rule will be effective October 1, 2012 

without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

September 4, 2012. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. All 

public comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed rule. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this rule. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this rule 

should do so at this time. If no such 

comments are received, the public is 

advised that this rule will be effective 

on October 1, 2012 and no further action 

will be taken on the proposed rule. 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 45965 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by October 1, 2012. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: July 23, 2012. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator EPA Region 10. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart N—Idaho 

■ 2. Amend the table in § 52.670(e) 

entitled ‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory 

Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory 

Measures’’ by adding an entry to the end 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.670 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES

Name of SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or nonattainment 

area 

State submittal 

date EPA approval date Comments 

*******

Northern Ada County Air Quality 

Maintenance Area Second 10- 

year Carbon Monoxide Limited 

Maintenance Plan.

State-wide .............................................. 2/10/11 8/2/12 [Insert page number 

where the document begins].

■ 3. Amend § 52.672 by adding 

paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 52.672 Approval of plans. 

(a) * * * 

(2) EPA approves as a revision to the 

Idaho State Implementation Plan, the 

Northern Ada County Air Quality 

Maintenance Area Second 10-year 

Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance 

Plan submitted by the State on February 

10, 2011. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–18787 Filed 8–1–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0234; FRL–9708–4] 

Determination of Attainment for the 

Paul Spur/Douglas PM10

Nonattainment Area, Arizona; 

Determination Regarding Applicability 

of Clean Air Act Requirements 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing a 

determination that the Paul Spur/ 

Douglas nonattainment area in Arizona 

is currently attaining the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

for particulate matter with an 

aerodynamic diameter of less than or 

equal to a nominal ten micrometers 

(PM10) based on certified, qualityassured ambient air monitoring data for 

the years 2009–2011. Given our 

determination that the Paul Spur/ 

Douglas nonattainment area is currently 

attaining the PM10 NAAQS, EPA is also 

determining that Arizona’s obligation to 

make submissions to meet certain Clean 

Air Act requirements related to 

attainment of the NAAQS is not 

applicable for as long as the Paul Spur/ 

Douglas nonattainment area continues 

to attain the NAAQS and that the 

obligation on EPA to promulgate a 

Federal Implementation Plan to address 

the State’s attainment-related 

requirements is also suspended for as 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES