alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEP 

## HYDRAULIC FRACTURING & STATE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
NGWA - Hydraulic Fracturing Workshop May 05, 2011DEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management (717)783 - 5469 joslee@state.pa.us 

## Joseph J. Lee, Jr., P.G PresidentDEP 1. State Oil & Gas (O&G) regulations are adequate to protect water resources 2. Well construction regulations are adequate for Hydraulic Fracturing (HF); However, development of adaptable BMPs would assist operators and states 3. There are environmental challenges for water and drinking water programs posed by gas shale development 4. We know surface water & ground water stressed by past mineral extraction in area of Marcellus Shale 5. We have holes in our understanding of ground water going forward 

## KEY MESSAGESDEP

### Depth to Marcellus Shale in feetDEPDEPDEP 

## Impacts on Water Resources 

## What We Know

• Water withdraws for HF solutions: streams, CWS •Produced water containment, transport, treatment, discharge or disposal. •Earth disturbance / construction, access & pipelines • Site waste – equipment maintenance repair & other operations.DEP 

## • Marcellus and Other Shale IssuesDEP 

## Water Pollution Causes: 

## What We Know

• Loss of produced water or wastes at the surface • Improper well casing design or construction •Aquifer disturbance during drilling • Improper treatment •No evidence or concern in Pennsylvania that HF has caused direct migration of fluids to underground sources of drinking waterDEPDEPDEPDEP 

# State Ground Water Quality Monitoring USGS Data Series Report 314 (2009): Most available data from ground waterDEPDEP 

## • Abandoned Mine DrainageDEPDEPDEPDEPDEP • 10/2008 - Elevated total dissolved solids (TDS) > than SDWA standard (500 mg/l) • Potential sources of TDS in watershed include abandoned & active surface and deep coal mines, waste water and industrial discharges (receiving HF flow -back) • PA DEP reduced HF % flow at wastewater treatment plants • River under historic low flow conditions • TDS concentrations returned to normal in December 2008 after recovery of river flowDEPDEP 

## • Marcellus and Other Shale IssuesDEPDEPDEP Gas Well Water Well Intake Gas WellsDEPDEPDEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management (717)783 - 5469 joslee@state.pa.us 

## Joseph J. Lee, Jr., P.G President
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Fai Cheung and Jhong Zheng, Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 545]

Appeal by the People from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DeMakos, J.), dated November 16, 1993, which granted the motion of the defendant Fai Cheung to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and to dismiss the indictment, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, also dated November 16, 1993, as granted the motion of the defendant Jhong Zheng to set aside a jury verdict to the extent of reducing the conviction of robbery in the second degree (two counts) to a single count of robbery in the third degree.

Ordered that the first order dated November 16, 1993, is reversed, the motion of the defendant Fai Cheung is denied, and *734the indictment and verdict convicting that defendant of robbery in the second degree (two counts) are reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the second order dated November 16, 1993, is reversed insofar as appealed from, the motion of the defendant Jhong Zheng is denied, the conviction for robbery in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon are vacated, and the conviction of robbery in the second degree (two counts) is reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the matters are remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County for the sentencing of the defendant Fai Cheung and the resentencing of the defendant Jhong Zheng.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of the defendant Fai Cheung for a trial order of dismissal since the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to demonstrate every element of these crimes *(see,*CPL 290.10 [1]; 70.10 [1]; *People v Batashure,*75 NY2d 306, 309-310; *People v Singh,*191 AD2d 731; *People v Barnes,*178 AD2d 482, 483).

The Supreme Court also erred in granting the motion of the defendant Jhong Zheng to the extent of modifying the verdict since the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to establish his guilt of two counts of robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*CPL 330.30 [1]; *People v Colon,*65 NY2d 888, 890; *People v Floyd,*176 AD2d 554, 555).

We do not pass in any respect upon the weight of the evidence nor upon any other aspect of this case which may be the subject of future appeals by the defendants from the judgments of conviction *(see, People v Goodfriend,*64 NY2d 695; *People v Brown,*141 AD2d 657, 658). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit No. 32.1
----------------
Form 10-QSB
Million Dollar Saloon, Inc.
File No. 0-27006

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Million  Dollar  Saloon,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Nick  Mehmeti,  Chief  Executive  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 18, 2008                           By:    /s/ Nick Mehmeti
---------------------                                  -------------------------
                                                                    Nick Mehmeti
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Million Dollar  Saloon,  Inc. and will be retained by Million Dollar
Saloon,  Inc. to be furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Readout of Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III's Meeting with Republic of Korea Minister of National Defense Lee Jong-Sup

DoD Release

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1208 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1208

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, Texas, as the ``Converse Veterans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONVERSE VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Converse Veterans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Converse 
Veterans Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          69,829
<SECURITIES>                                   110,545
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (300)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,367
<PP&E>                                           8,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       202,593
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,368)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,773
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (77)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
No. 91-6232.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2398

STARSHA SEWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:12-cv-02522-DKC)

Submitted: April 11, 2016 Decided: April 21, 2016

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie A. Lewis, Assistant 

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying 

as moot her motion for recusal and denying her motion for relief 

from judgment and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince 

George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02522-DKC (D. 

Md. Oct. 21 & Nov. 2, 2015). The motions to transfer, for 

telephone conference, and for default and summary judgment are 

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
December 3, 1979

#### Halberg v. State Accident Insurance Fund

(13374).

Reversed with instructions to enter an order denying compensation. *Weller v. Union Carbide,*35 Or App 355, 582 P2d 8 (1978), *aff'd*288 Or 27, 602 P2d 259 (1979); *Gibson v. SAIF,*37 Or App 375, 587 P2d 116 (1978), *aff'd*288 Or 45, 602 P2d 266 (1979). (603 P2d 368)
l  Page #

February 28, 2003



RESIN SYSTEMS INC.

14604  115 A Avenue

Edmonton, AB, T5M 3C5

Tel: 780-482-1953                   Fax: 780-452-8755



Managements Responsibility for Financial Reporting

August 31, 2002



The accompanying consolidated financial statements and all of the information included in this report have been prepared by and are the responsibility of, management and the Board of Directors of Resin Systems Inc.  The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and reflect managements best estimates and judgments based on currently available information.  The significant accounting policies which management believes are appropriate for the Company are described in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements.



Additionally, management has prepared, as a supplement to the consolidated financial statements, a reconciliation of the financial information to conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles.  The Company became a reporting issuer of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as announced on December 3, 2002.



The Company has developed and maintains an appropriate system of internal controls in order to ensure, on a reasonable and cost-effective basis, that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.



The Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements and overseeing managements performance of its financial reporting responsibilities.  The Board has appointed an Audit Committee comprised of one officer and two independent Directors.



The Audit Committee reviews the financial statements, the adequacy of internal controls, the audit process and financial reporting with management and the external auditors.  The Audit Committee reports to the Board of Directors prior to the approval of the audited financial statements for publication.



KPMG LLP, the external auditors, have performed an audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards on behalf of the shareholders.



January 8, 2003









Signed  Greg Pendura

Signed  Keith Gerrard

Greg Pendura

Keith Gerrard

President and CEO

Controller



















MR 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7776

MICHAEL GLEASON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GEORGE JANICE, Warden, Stevens Correctional Center,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

HONORABLE DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, 

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00061-GMG-JES)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 28, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Gregory Dyer, DYER LAW OFFICE, Clarksburg, West Virginia; 

David J. Joffe, JOFFE LAW, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for 

Appellant. Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST 

VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Gleason seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gleason has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.3 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 OF 

APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. 
 DEFERRED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (2005 Restatement) 

The “APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. DEFERRED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN” as adopted by APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and first
effective February 27, 1986, and as amended and restated in a document entitled “Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (2005 Restatement)” effective January 1, 2005 and as amended by prior amendments was
further amended by the Board of Directors on October 6, 2010 in the following respect: 
 1. SEPARATION FROM SERVICE. Effective as of
October 6, 2010, Section 1.3.13(b) of the Plan Statement is amended by replacing “twelve (12) month period” with “thirty-six (36) month period” and “twelve” with “thirty-six”.

 2. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as herein expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect.
ACC Resin Statistics Summary

U.S. PRODUCTION, SALES & CAPTIVE USE

(millions of pounds, dry weight basis)(1)

Production Total Sales & Captive Use

Resin % Chg % Chg

2009 2008 09/08 2009 2008 09/08

Epoxy (2) 535 583 -8.2 497 603 -17.6

Other Thermosets (5) 12,152 14,508 -16.2 12,108 14,443 -16.2

 Total Thermosets 12,687 15,091 -15.9 12,605 15,046 -16.2

LDPE (2)(3) 6,667 7,003 -4.8 6,740 7,143 -5.6

LLDPE (2)(3) 13,126 12,058 8.9 12,913 12,385 4.3

HDPE (2)(3) 16,956 16,247 4.4 17,010 16,823 1.1

PP (2)(4) 16,623 16,768 -0.9 16,754 17,235 -2.8

PS (2)(3) 4,865 5,220 -6.8 4,969 5,364 -7.4

Nylon (2)(4) 943 1,148 -17.9 951 1,164 -18.3

PVC (3) 12,754 12,789 -0.3 12,781 12,948 -1.3

Other Thermoplastics (6) 14,049 15,222 -7.7 15,282 16,054 -4.8

 Total Thermoplastics 85,983 86,455 -0.5 87,400 89,116 -1.9

GRAND TOTAL PLASTICS 98,670 101,546 -2.8 100,005 104,162 -4.0

(1) Except Phenolic resins, which are reported on a gross weight basis.

(2) Sales & Captive Use data include imports.

(3) Canadian production and sales data included.

(4) Canadian and Mexican production and sales data included.

(5) Includes: polyurethanes (TDI, MDI and polyols), phenolic, urea, melamine, unsaturated polyester and other thermosets.

(6) Includes: PET, ABS, engineering resins, SB Latex, and other thermoplastics.

Sources: Plastics Industry Producers' Statistics Group (PIPS), as compiled by Veris Consulting, Inc.; ACC

2009 vs. 2008

Year End 2009 Stats
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1298/2004

of 15 July 2004         

amending the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the milk and milk products sector (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1162/2004 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1787/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 121).

(2)OJ L 224, 25.6.2004, p. 9.

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 16 July 2004 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131350 & (23) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 131350 COA: 266135 Wayne CC: 86-006461-FY TERRY LYNN COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk