alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
by BBC Graphics of Palm Beach, Inc. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Robert Druzak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

December 22, 2006                    By:/s/ Robert Druzak
                                        ------------------------
                                            Robert Druzak
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Espinal, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 1019]

Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Saunders,*190 AD2d 1092, *8171093, *lv denied*81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DOANE
PRODUCTS COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,009
<PP&E>                                          98,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,096
<BONDS>                                        160,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     22,624
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,844
<SALES>                                        355,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               355,957
<CGS>                                          314,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  337,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,163)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (6,705)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Contact : Directory : J1

# J1 Manpower and Personnel

Directory Links

                        -  J0 Special Staff   
                        -  J1 Manpower and Personnel   
                        -  J2 Intelligence   
                        -  J3 Operations   
                        -  J4 Logistics   
                        -  J5 Strategic Planning & Policy   
                        -  J6 Communications Systems   
                        -  J7 Training and Exercises Directorate   
                        -  J8 Requirements and Resources Directorate   
                        -  Joint Interagency Task Force - West   

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector GeneralAccessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Flickr
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 
Commission Monthly Case Activity for November 2015 
 
 
  
 
1. 
 Cases Pending Beginning of Month  
 36 
 
 
  
 
  
 
2. 
 Cases Added to Docket  
 
 
 0 
 
 
3. 
 Cases Subtracted From Docket 
 
Dana Container, Inc. 
No. 09-1184 
Decision on November 19, 2015 
 
Charles W. Mason, DDS & Associates, PLLC 
No. 10-2313 
Decision on November 20, 2015 
 
 
 -2 
 
4. 
 Total Cases Pending End of Month 
 34
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Greg Pendura, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Resin Systems Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:

July 29, 2005

/s/ Greg Pendura__________________

Greg Pendura
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATTQRN6Y GENERIL 

Hon. R. F. Robinson 

'coullt~, Attorney 

UillaoJ cmLi.i* 

Ragmmdvllle, Texas 

n 

Dear Sir: 

and Rovember 3, 

OS this departa basis of faots 

are quoted as 

ads in part as 

property held or owxmd.by 

11 be liable ror all State 

owner thereoi, illol~ tax 

propert axid poll tax. . . . 1 

er authorit of the above statute the 

lllaqj-County hwrefksed to aooept 

r of real estate or all taxes against 

on the grcmnd that a poll,tax has been 

the wife of said owner, the owner 

said poll tax vith his other taxes. 

"Klndl~ adtise, at your earliest oonvenienoe, 

whether the Tax Goll.e.otor Is justiiied in reiusing the 

tender~undim the abov6 oiroumstanoea." 
-. 

365 

Ron..R. F. Robinstin, plrgq 2

to pay $he taxes assisse& a&iinst the iaaei uitheut at the 

Same t* ylng the poll tu assessed a 

Ye think 8s pctsitien is swklneU ,in S ei 

%mthQ Mfei 

Bb v1 ltabba 

207 &W-636, holding that the 8tak does not have a'lien 

onrealprapertyto ~bimrethepbymsnt 0rmh0~p0rs~l 

PrOPerCy or poll me8 dw bJ th0 omer Of the 18d. 
y;;. 366 

_.. 

. . 

Eon. R. B. Robi.rqon, page 3 

SumarisIng our oonolwlon, we hold that the 

%3xColleota is within Us legal rights to retire the 

pamnt of the poll tax assessed against both the husband 

aad the vtfe in the paJaant,of State end County ad valorem 

taxes assessed against the oormnrnit~ property, other than 

I the-hsmestcurd. Bat if the property @e the separate 

property~of the hu∧ he may pay the State- and Cmty 

-. ~a& talerem taxes thereon without paylug the poll t+ 

* . ~'a2isessed against his pife. 

* I:, 

. W-3 t=W Jaurs 4'; ".," .: ATToRm GRREUL OF TRXAS 

-.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>          5
       
<S>                  <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>        3-MOS
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        280208
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 137710
<ALLOWANCES>                  0 
<INVENTORY>                   11344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              362521
<PP&E>                        3506458
<DEPRECIATION>                1432526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3490335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         328078
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      5010
<OTHER-SE>                    2620362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3490335
<SALES>                       1772768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1993380
<CGS>                         1040515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 613451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            34339
<INCOME-PRETAX>               407932
<INCOME-TAX>                  96700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           311232
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  311232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
The financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 1997


AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
Financial statements in Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,1997.

[/LEGEND]

  

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS John S. McCain Passes Inspection and Survey Assessment

By MC3 Joshua MortensenUSS John S. McCain Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E90]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. J. GRESHAM BARRETT

                           of south carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, January 14, 2009

  Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina. Madam Speaker, unfortunately I missed 
recorded votes on the House floor on Tuesday January 13, 2009.
  Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on Rollcall vote No. 
11 (Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to H. Res. 41), ``yes'' on 
Rollcall vote No. 12 (Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to H. Res. 
50), ``no'' on Rollcall vote No. 13 (Motion to Suspend the Rules and 
Agree to H. Res. 43).

                          ____________________
```
NUMBER 13-20-00026-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

EDWARD JEROME HUFF, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 272nd District Court 

of Brazos County, Texas.

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. Having reviewed the documents 

on file, this Court has determined that this cause was reinstated prematurely. Our 

February 23, 2022 order of abatement remanded to the trial court to determine the 

feasibility of a retrospective competency inquiry given the passage of time, availability of 
2

evidence, and any other pertinent considerations. See Turner v. State, 422 S.W.3d 676, 

696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citing 43 GEORGE E. DIX & JOHN M. SCHMOLESKY, TEXAS 

PRACTICE: CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 31:81, at 89–90 & n.10 (3d ed. 2011)). 

The trial court has complied with this directive, determining that a competency hearing is 

feasible. As such, on remand, the trial court is instructed to conduct an informal inquiry 

into Edward Jerome Huff’s competency to stand trial. If the informal inquiry establishes 

that there is some evidence of incompetency, the trial court shall conduct a formal 

competency trial. It is hereby ORDERED that the supplemental clerk’s record and the 

supplemental reporter’s record of the trial court’s proceedings on remand shall be filed 

with this Court on or before ninety days from the date of this order for reinstatement of 

this appeal. See Bautista v. State, 605 S.W.3d 520, 530–31 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] 2020, no pet.).

We abate this appeal and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with 

this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of January, 2023.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 49 9

. KEVI N EATON v . RONALD W ELBORN, A / K / A ROBERT W ELBORN, A/ K/ A RONALD BENNETT W ELBORN, J R.

In t h i s ci v i l act i o n , t h e p l ai n t i ff Kev in Eat on d i rect l y ap p eal s t h e t ri al co urt ’ s

o rd er d en y i n g h i s m o t i o n f o r a n ew t ri al
, fo l l owi n g a ju d g m en t i n h i s fav o r i n t h e

am ou n t o f $ 4 ,0 0 0 .0 0

. Th e d efen d an t h as fi led a m o ti o n t o d i sm i s s t h e ap peal

. Ap p eal s i n act io n s f

o r d a m ag es i n wh i ch t he ju d g m en t i s $ 1 0 ,0 0 0

. 0 0 o r l es s

m u st b e i n i t i at ed b y

fi li n g an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary rev i ew. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (6 ), ( b ) ; J

e n n i ng s v. Mo s s , 2 3 5 Ga. A p p

. 3 57 (5 0 9 SE2 d 6 5 5 ) (1 9 98 ). Eat o n ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l ow t h e req u ired ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s di ct io n o v er t h i s
ap p eal

. Acco rd i n gl y , t h e d efen d an t ’ s m ot i o n t o d i sm i s s i s hereb y GRANTED, an d

t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 10, 2018

05/10/2018
#### Lott, Respondent, vs. Grant, imp., Appellant.

*February 5*

March *5, 1929.*

*292For the appellant there was a brief by *Lines, Spooner & Quarles*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Charles B. Quarles.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *I. A. Dinerstein*and *Aaron L. Weiss,*and oral argument by *Michael Levin,*all of Milwaukee.

Eschweiler, J.

Appellant Grant was a dealer in secondhand automobiles. Defendant Stoner, accompanied by his father, visited Grant for a purchase of automobile parts, and Grant suggested making an exchange of their Studebaker automobile. Grant, an experienced driver, took Stoner with him in a car similar in make to the car that Stoner had been for some time operating. Grant drove the car for several blocks with Stoner in the front seat. They exchanged seats, and Stoner drove the car for about a block and a half up to the point of accident. Grant gave no specific directions to Stoner as to the latter’s method of driving, but testified that his purpose in so remaining on the front seat while Stoner was driving was that he, Grant, could direct the operations of the automobile in case of accident.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a judgment of his liability for this accident on either of the two grounds claimed by respondent, namely, that the appellant and Stoner were then engaged in a joint enterprise; or that defendant Stoner was, while driving the car, the agent of appellant so as to charge him with Stoner’s negligence.

• It must be held in a situation such as here presented, where the owner of the car, desirous of effecting a sale, and while *293it was being operated for demonstration purposes as an aid to effect such prospective sale, that it was being driven to further Grant’s business, and then Grant’s continued presence on the front seat in a situation where he could instantly give directions, if necessary, to Stoner as driver, created a relationship between the two wherein Stoner was Grant’s agent and his negligence became imputable to Grant.

This disposition of the case makes it unnecessary to consider any other suggested questions.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-18-00821-CR, 04-18-00822-CR, 04-18-00823-CR, 04-18-00827-CR, 04-18-00855-CR

Jake Eric ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 16-10-12125-CR, 16-05-11980-CR, 18-04-12822-CR, 

16-05-11973-CR, 16-10-12126-CR 

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED November 27, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 
| May  1, 2006 | /s/  Stephanie G. DiMarco              |   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|         | Stephanie  G. DiMarco                  |   |
|         | Chief  Executive Officer and President |   |

 

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

----