alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          52,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,733,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,818,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        724,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,818,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,417
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Vera Minka, Respondent, v Peter Minka, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 736]

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding against respondent to enforce the child support provision of a 1987 judgment of divorce. Respondent appeals from an order of Family Court denying his objections and confirming the findings of fact and order of the Hearing Examiner, thereby adjudging respondent to be liable for $15,400 in arrears. Although Family Court found that respondent’s objections were not timely filed, it considered those objections in the interest of justice. We agree that the objections were untimely, but conclude that the court should have dismissed them on *811that ground *(see,*Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; *Matter of Zunino v Mahoney,*204 AD2d 469, 469-470; *Matter of Oliver v Oliver,*202 AD2d 309, 311; *Matter of Menaldino [Aletha TT.J v Mark UU.,*141 AD2d 265, 267; *Matter of Werner v Werner, 130*AD2d 754). Further, respondent’s failure to file objections in a timely fashion bars appellate review of those objections *(see, Matter of Werner v Werner, supra).*

Were we to reach the merits, we would conclude that the decision of the Hearing Examiner is supported by the evidence and is not contrary to law. Respondent contends that he should be credited with payments made to the child by his wholly-owned corporation. The Hearing Examiner properly credited the child’s testimony, which was unequivocally supported by documentary evidence, that the weekly payments made between May 1987 and August 1991 were wages. With respect to the large payments made in August 1991 and August 1992, we agree with the Hearing Examiner’s reasoning that money paid directly to the child to enable him to pay his college-related expenses cannot defray respondent’s court-ordered obligation to pay child support to petitioner *(see, O’Brien v O’Brien,*136 AD2d 531, 532; *Fabrizio v Fabrizio,*125 AD2d 634, *lv denied*70 NY2d 614; *cf., Garguiolo v Topp,*184 AD2d 1027, 1028). (Appeal from Order of-Monroe County Family Court, Miller, J.— Child Support.) Present — Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Data Summit Syncs Joint Strategy, Standards

JUSTIN EIMERS, PEO C3T

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Director, IMCOM-P Highlights People and Environment during Tour of USAG Daegu

By y Mathew Gleeson

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
EXHIBIT 10.25  Hittite Microwave Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan  Directors who are our employees receive no separate compensation for
their services as directors. Our non-employee directors receive cash fees and
equity-based compensation in the form of awards under our 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan, as follows:  ·each
non-employee director receives an annual cash fee in the amount of $15,000; ·the chairperson
of each of our board committees receives an additional cash fee as follows:
audit committee chair, $10,000; compensation committee chair, $8,000; and nominating
committee chair, $8,000; and ·each other
member of a board committee receives an additional annual cash fee of $8,000.  The cash fees described above are paid quarterly in arrears.
Non-employee directors are also reimbursed upon request for travel and other
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at meetings
of the board and of committees on which they serve.  In addition, each non-employee director who is first elected to the
board or who is elected to an additional one-year term at any annual meeting of
stockholders, will upon such election receive a restricted stock award of 1,500
shares of our common stock. Each such restricted stock award will vest on the
earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the date of the next
annual meeting of stockholders.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BOBBY LAMONT FLETCHER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# A Key Enabler in the Navy's Supply Chain: Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka Site Hong Kong

By Tina C. StillionsNaval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka Director of Corporate Communications

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Joins with Indian Diaspora Luminaries to Celebrate 75 Years of U.S.-India Relations

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-06-007

Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of a Proposed Regulation for Mobile Cargo 

Handling Equipment at Ports and Intermodal Rail Yards

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2005, the Air Resources Board (the Board or ARB) 

conducted a public hearing to consider adoption of regulation to reduce emissions of

diesel particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) from mobile cargo handling 

equipment that operate at ports and intermodal rail yards in the State of California, as 

set forth in the Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public on October 21, 2005;

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on December 8, 2005, the Board adopted 

Resolution 05-62 in which the Board approved adoption of new section 2479 of article 3, 

chapter 3, division 3, title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR), as set forth in 

Attachment A thereto;

WHEREAS, Resolution 05-62 directed the Executive Officer to take final action to adopt 

the regulation set forth in Attachment A to Resolution 05-62, with specified modifications 

and such other conforming modifications as may be appropriate, after making the 

modified regulatory language available for public comment for a period of at least 

15 days, provided that the Executive Officer shall consider such written comments as 

may be submitted during this period, shall make further modifications as may be 

appropriate in light of the comments received, and shall present the regulation to the 

Board for further consideration if she determines that this is warranted;

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2006, the modified regulatory text, reflecting the modifications 

approved by the Board and other changes made to best reflect the intent of the Board at 

the hearing, were made available for public comment for a period of 15 days, with the 

changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the 

provisions of title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; Attachment 1 hereto 

reflects the modified regulation as made available for comment; and 

WHEREAS, written comments were received during the 15-day comment period and 

those comments have been considered by the Executive Officer.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in 

Resolution 05-62 are incorporated by reference herein.
Executive Order R-06-007 -2-

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that adoption of new section 2479, title 13, CCR are 

adopted as set forth in Attachment 1 hereto.

Executed this 17th day of October , 2006, at Sacramento, California.

/s/

Catherine Witherspoon

Executive Officer

Attachment
No. 90-685.

#### Alday *v.*Container Corporation of America et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                              <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1998              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                        21,042                   19,628
<SECURITIES>                                       0                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,158                    5,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                        0
<INVENTORY>                                        0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0                        0
<PP&E>                                     3,570,822                4,223,677
<DEPRECIATION>                               183,639                  262,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,780,131                4,119,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0                        0
<BONDS>                                    1,847,854                1,901,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                        0
<COMMON>                                           0                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,016,148                2,098,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,780,131                4,119,224
<SALES>                                            0                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             125,307                  150,648
<CGS>                                              0                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 33,689                   43,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              24,408                   31,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            29,267                   28,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               37,943                   47,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           46,969                   52,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                        0
<CHANGES>                                          0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  39,545                   42,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.69                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.69                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
No. 91-6131.

#### Parikh *v.*Choy.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 18-3120

___________________________ Matthew Todd Watkins lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Commissioner, Social S ecurity Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________ Submitted: June 5, 2019 Filed: June 10, 2019 [Unpublished]

____________ Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Matthew Todd Watkins appeals the district court’s 1 affirmance of the Commissioner’s decision denying him disability insurance benefits (DIB). We find that the decision denying DIB is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Chesser v. Berryhill , 858 F.3d 1161, 1164 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review; where it is possible to draw two inconsistent conclusions from evidence and one of them represents Commissioner’s findings , this court must affirm). Specifically, we conclude that the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) resi dual functional capacity (RFC) determinati on was proper, see Combs v. Berryhill , 878 F.3d 642, 646 (8th Cir. 2017) (ALJ determines RFC based on a ll relevant evidence, including medical records, observations of treating physic ians and others, and claimant’s own description of his limitations), in part because the opinion of Watkins’s treating neurologist that he would miss at least f our days of work per month was properly discounted, see Wildman v. Astrue , 596 F.3d 959, 964 (8th Cir. 2010) (treating physician’s opinion was properly discounted as conclusory, as it was in checklist format, cited no medical evidence, and o ffered little or no elaboration); see also Gieseke v. Colvin , 770 F.3d 1186, 1189 (8th Cir. 2014) (ALJ properly relies on vocational expert’s testimony when hypothetical question captures concrete consequences of claimant’s deficiencies). We also conclude that the credibility findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ ) were entitled to defe rence, as they were supported by valid reasons. See Julin v. Colvin , 826 F.3d 1082, 1086 (8th Cir. 2016) (where good reasons and substantial evidence support ALJ’s credibility determination, it is entitled to deference). The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
No. 90-537.

#### Gulley et al. *v.*Sunbelt Savings, FSB, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# US Navy Kicks Off 26th RIMPAC Exercise

By U.S. Third Fleet

                JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News