### TABLE 1: An nual Respondent Burden and Cost-NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart A AAAA)

REPORTING/RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT (A) Respondent Hours per Occurence (Technical hours) (B)

Number of Occurences per Respondent per Year

(C) Hours per Respondent per Year (C=A x B) (D)

Number of Respondents per Yeara (E)

Technical Hours per Year @ $97.59 (E=C x D) (F)

Managem en t Hours per Year @ $114.77 (F= E x 0.05) (G)

Clerical Hours per Year @ $48.26 (G= E x 0.1)

Total Labor Costs per Year

1. APPLICATIONS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. SURVEY AND STUDIES N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3. 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,326.18

4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
a. Read Instructions b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 b. Required Activities Repeat performance tests c 40 1 40 12.2 488 24.4 48.8 $52,779.40 Visible em ission (VE) report for material handling f 8 1 8 62 496 24.8 49.6 $53,644.63 Annual inspection of capture, collection, and transport system g 8 1 8 62 496 24.8 49.6 $53,644.63 Inspection and maintenance of affected sources, control devices, and monitoring systems according to operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan h 4 1 4 62 248 12.4 24.8 $26,822.32

c. Create Information d. Gather Existing Information
e. Wr ite Report Notification of Applicabilityb 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 Notification of Construction/Reconstruction b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 Notification of Anticipated Startup b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 Notification of Actual Startup b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 Notification of Special Compliance Requirements N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Compliance Extention Request b 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $216.31 Notification of Performance Test 2 1 2 13.2 26.4 1.32 2.64 $2,855.28 Notification of Opacity

/VE Observations 2 1 2 62 124 6.2 12.4 $13,411.16 Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan b 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,326.18 Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan b 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,326.18 Site-Specific Test Plan b 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,326.18 ACQUISITION, INSTALLATION, AND UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS b

------------------------Included in 4b---------------------------- ------------------------Included in 4b----------------------------Notification of Compliance Status b 8 1 8 1 8 0.4 0.8 $865.24 Wa iver Application N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sem iannual Com pliance Reports i 8 2 16 62 992 49.6 99.2 $107,289.26 Em ergency

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Reportsj, k 8 1 8 3.1 25 1.2 2.5 $2,682.23 1,305 65 131 TOTAL REPORTING BURDEN 1,501 Hours $141,163 5. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
a. Read Instructions b. Plan Activities 3 1 3 1 3 0.15 0.3 $324.46

c. Implement Activities l 12 1 12 1 12 0.6 1.2 $1,297.85 d. Develop Record System 3 1 3 1 3 0.15 0.3 $324.46

e. Time to Enter Information Record of All Information Required by Standards m 3 52 156 62 9,672 484 967 $1,046,070.32
f. Train Personnel n 3 1 3 1 3 0.15 0.3 $324.46

g. 3 1 3 1 3 0.15 0.3 $324.46
h. Time to Transmit or Disclose Information p 0.25 2 0.50 62 31 1.55 3.1 $3,352.79 g. Time for Audits N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11,497 575 1,150 TOTAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 13,222 Hours $1,243,452 12,802 640 1,280 TOTAL ANNUAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST 14,723 Hours $1,384,616 6. ANNUAL CAPITAL COSTS
a. 13.2 $17,750 b. Performance test for material handling c, e 13.2 $17,750

c. Bag Leak Detector p 62 $88,908 TOTAL ANNUAL CAPITAL and O&M COSTS $124,408

Assumptions

b. This is a one-time only activity

. c. To demonstrate continuous compliance, plants must conduct performance tests every 5 years. The number of respondents to repeat performance test is 12.2 performance tests per year (61 existing respondents/5years) . The cost to conduct a repeat Method 5 performance test is $5,000. The annualized capital cost to conduct this test is $1,250 per

Performance test for kilns c, d ------------------------Included in 4a----------------------------

a. Assumed that the average number of respondent that will be subject to the rule will be 61 existing respondents. There will be one additional new source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR.

Time to Adjust Existing W ast to Comply with Previously

Applicable Requirem ents o Total Reporting Hours by Labor Category

Total Recordkeeping Hours by Labor Category

Total Hours by

Labor Category

d. Assumed that there will be a total of three new kilns in production over the three year period of the ICR, which will average out to one unit per year. The cost for an initial Method 5 test is $10,000, and the annualized cost for an initial performance test is $2,500 per new unit. One new unit per year is expected to conduct an initial Method 5 test.e. Assumed that each existing plant has a material handling operation that would conduct a Method 5 performance test every 5 years. The number of respondents to conduct subsequent performance tests each year would be 61 existing respondents/5 years, or 12.2 respondents per year. Each respondent would incur an annual cost of $1,250 to perform subsequent Method 5 performance tests. Each new respondent is assumed to have a material handling operation that would conduct an initial Method 5 performance test. The cost of the initial test is $2,500 per new unit. f. Assumed that each respondent will take 8 hours to complete the annual visible emission (VE) tests for material handling. g. Assumed that each respondent will take 8 hours to complete the annual inspection of the capture, collection, and transport system. h. Assumed that each respondent will take 4 hours to complete the inspection and maintenance of affected sources, control devices, and monitoring systems according to operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan.REPORTING/RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENT (A) EPA Hours per Occurence (Technical hours) (B)

Number of Occurences per Plant per Year (C)

EPA Hours per Year (C=A x B) (D)

Plants per Year a (E)

Technical Hours per Year @ $45.52 (E=C x D) (F)

Managem ent Hours per Year @ $61.36 (F= E x 0.05) (G)

Clerical Hours per Year @ $24.64 (G= E x 0.1)

Costs per Year

INITIAL PERFORMANCE TESTS 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $2,042.08
2 1 2 12.2 24.4 1.22 2.44 $1,245.67
REPEAT PERFORMANCE TEST b, c 40 1 40 12.2 488 24.4 48.8 $24,913.38

Notification of Applicability 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $51.05 Notification of Construction/Reconstruction 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $51.05 Notification of Anticipated Startup 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $51.05 Notification of Actual Startup 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $51.05 Notification of Special Compliance N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notification of Initial Performance Tests 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 $51.05 Notification of Compliance Status 4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $204.21 Review of Repeat Performance Test Report b, d 2 1 2 12.2 24.4 1.22 2.44 $1,245.67 Review of Sem iannual Com pliance Report 4 2 8 62 496 24.8 49.6 $25,321.79 Review of W aiver Application N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Review of Em ergency

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Reporte 4 1 4 3.1 12.4 0.62 1.24 $633.04 SALARY BURDEN (per year) 1,094.2 54.71 109.42 $55,861 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN $55,861

Assumptions

c. Assumed that it will take 40 hours for respondents to repeat performance tests. d. Assumed that it will take 2 hours for respondents to review repeat performance test report. e. Assumed five percent of sources will need to submit emergency startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. a. Assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 61 existing respondents. There will be one additional new source per year that will becom e subject to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR for an average of 62 existing and new respondents per year. b. To demonstrate continuous compliance, plants must conduct repeat performance tests every 5 years. The number of respondents to repeat performance test is 12.2 test/year (61 existing respondents/5years = 12.2 performance tests per year) starting in the second year of this ICR. 1,258 

### TABLE 2: Annual A

gency Burden and Cost - NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart A AAAA)

REPORT REVIEW RETESTING PREPARATION FOR REPEAT PERFORMANCE TESTS b