alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           391,897
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    897,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                      41,292
<INVENTORY>                                      785,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,900,847
<PP&E>                                         1,651,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                   331,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,875,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,477,471
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          500
<COMMON>                                             729
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,516,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,875,574
<SALES>                                        1,940,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,940,351
<CGS>                                          1,351,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,351,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,185,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (601,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (120,367)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (481,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (481,474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marines Showcase Marksmanship Skills at the 2018 Far East Marksmanship Competition on Okinawa

By Pfc. Brennan BeautonMarine Corps Installations Pacific

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H378]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            LEAVE OF ABSENCE

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to:
  Mr. Sessions (at the request of Mr. Boehner) for today on account of 
attending a funeral.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1
                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  EXHIBIT 12 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In thousands)

                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED        NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         MARCH 31,                MARCH 31,
                                     -------------------       -----------------
                                       2000         1999       2000       1999
                                       ----         ----       ----       ----
Consolidated pretax income
    from continuing operations       $  1,268   $ (9,344)   $  1,805   $(45,354)
Interest expense                        3,580      3,809      10,693      9,990
Interest portion of rent expense          126        126         405        429
                                     --------   ---------   --------   ---------
   EARNINGS                          $  4,974   $ (5,409)   $ 12,903   $(34,935)
                                     ========   =========   ========   =========

Interest expense                     $  3,580   $  3,809    $ 10,693   $  9,990
Interest capitalized                       94         90         290        548
Interest portion of rent expense          126        126         405        429
Preferred shares accretion                605       --         1,208       --
                                     --------   ---------   --------   ---------
   FIXED CHARGES                     $  4,405   $  4,025    $ 12,596   $ 10,967
                                     ========   =========   ========   =========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES        1.1       --           1.0       --
                                     ========   =========   ========   =========

For purposes of calculating the unaudited ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of income (loss) from continuing operations before provision
for income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest charges
and amortization of debt issuance costs, whether expensed or capitalized, that
portion of rental expense that is representative of interest, and preferred
shares accretion. In the three months ended March 31, 1999, earnings were
inadequate to cover fixed charge requirements by $9,434. In the nine months
ended March 31, 1999, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charge
requirements by $45,902.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Linda C. Potts, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Insignia Solutions plc;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

1

----

 

(a)          allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)         anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2003       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |
|   | /s/ LINDA C.  POTTS      |   |
|   | Linda C.  Potts          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|        |                          |        |  |  |

 

2

----
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Christopher F. Zerull, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report, any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: January 21, 2005
/s/ Christopher F. Zerull
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID YARBOROUGH

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 397 , 2017

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No s

. 1202006406,

§ 120101825 3, 1402013417

§

§

§

Submitted: October 10 , 201 7

Decided: October 26 , 2017

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; VALIHURA and VAUGHN

, Justices.

ORDER

This 26 th day of October 2017

, upon consideration of the notice to show cause

and the appellant’s response , it appears to the Court that:

(1) On September 28, 2017 , the appellant , David Yarborough

, filed a notice

of appeal from an August 31, 2017 Superior Court order d enying his motion for

appointment of counsel and granting his motion to amend his motion for

postconviction relief

. T he Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to show cause directing

Yarborough to show why his appeal should not be dismissed based on this Court’ s

lack of jurisdiction under Article IV, § 11(1)(b) of the Delaware Constitution to hear2

an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case

. In his response to the notice to show

cause, Yarborough argues the merits of his motion for appointment of counsel

.

(2) Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may review only a final

judgment in a criminal case. 1 The Superior Court’ s denial of Yarborough’s motion

to appoint counsel is an interlocutory, not final, order

. 2 This Court therefore does

not have jurisdiction to review this appeal. 3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29 (b ),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b).

2 See, e.g.

, Harris v. State , 2013 WL 4858990, at *1 (Del. Sept. 10, 2013) ( holding Superior Court

order denying motion for appointment of counsel is an interlocutory order )

. 3 Gottlieb v. State , 697 A.2d 400, 401 (Del. 1997).
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of INSIGNIA SOLUTIONS
PLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, Michael Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/Michael MooreMichael
      MooreChief Financial OfficerMarch
      19, 2009
No. 91-6116.

#### Moreno Mendoza *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>
Date: 11/09/2010 08:02AM
Subject: Vinyl Institute Letter on Resin Stripping and 10-26-10 Meeting


Dear Ms. Howard,

 

Thank you for taking time to meet with the Vinyl Institute and some of its members on October 26, 2010.  As you requested as a follow up to the discussion from that meeting, I am attaching a brief letter and chart that documents some of our comments regarding resin stripping and other items that were reviewed.  Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.  Thank you.  



Richard Krock
Technical Director
 
The Vinyl Institute
1737 King Street Suite 390
Alexandria, VA 22314
Direct:  571.970.3392
Mobile:  571.216.4474
Fax:  571.970.3271
Email:  rkrock@vinylinfo.org
http://www.vinylinfo.org
http://www.vinylindesign.com
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

# Misawa F-16 Maintainers Crank 100 Percent Mission Readiness

By Senior Airman Brittany A. Chase35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES ALEXANDER MOORE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2937

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 2, 2020. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Daniel Muller, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-112735 and 333-122016) pertaining to
the Corgentech Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2003 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Non-Plan Option Grants of our report dated
January 25, 2005 except for Note 11 as for which the date is March 11, 2005 with respect to the financial statements of Corgentech Inc. included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo
Alto, California
March 21, 2005

---



QuickLinks
#### West Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Josiah T. Estep.

1, *Instructions—Abstract*Propositions_ *of*Law.—The refusal to instruct upon abstract questions of law is not error, nor is it necessarily error to give such instructions.

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 11, 1896.

Egbert Jamieson and John A. Rose, attorneys for appellant.

Edward R. Woodle, attorney for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

November 17, 1891, the appellee was a passenger on a cable car which was .stopped by the contraction of the slot in which the grip runs, by reason of the cold weather. More cars were called to push the one the appellee was on, and when it was forced forward, the start was quick and sudden, so that the appellee was thrown down, and—as the jury have found upon conflicting evidence—severely hurt.

He recovered a judgment for $1,800, from which the appellant appealed.

The supposed error upon which the appellant relies, is the *618refusal by the court of two instructions asked by the appellant, as follows:

> “ The jury are instructed that while the law permits a plaintiff in a case to testify on his own behalf, nevertheless the jury have a right in weighing his evidence and determining how much credence is to be given to it, to take into consideration that he is the plaintiff and his interest in the result of the suit.”

> “ It is the duty of a passenger upon a street car to obey the reasonable instructions of those in charge of the same, and if such passenger is injured because of his failure to obey such reasonable instructions, he can not recover damages for such injury.”

These instructions do not, in terms, refer to the pending case, and are only statements of law in the abstract. It is therefore a sufficient, though technical, answer to the assigned error, that the refusal to instruct upon abstract propositions of law is not error. Devlin v. People, 104 Ill. 504; A. T. & S. F. R. R. v. Feehan, 149 Ill. 202; Ill. Cent. R. R. v. Larson, 152 Ill. 326.

Nor is it necessarily error to give instructions. Little v. Munson, 54 Ill. App. 437.

The second instruction is based upon evidence that the conductor and gripman said to the appellee that he had better get off while the endeavor to start the car was being made, but it can hardly be said that such evidence shows more than advice, not instructions which required obedience.

The judgment must be affirmed, but that this appeal was only for delay, is not so clear to us, that we may comply with the request of the counsel for the appellee to award damages. Affirmed.
No. 90-778.

#### Kraemer *v.*Spellacy et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Jill R. JACOWAY, etc., petitioner, v. Bruce ANDERSON, et al.

No. 87-71.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 5, 1987.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF EDWARD C. 

WAGNER, DECEASED

PETITION OF: JANET S. WAGNER AND 

JAMES R. WAGNER, JR.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 223 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.