alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 1, 2012 

t0125 

Order 

 

February 1, 2012 

143786 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143786 

 COA: 304210 

Saginaw CC: 09-033163-FH 

CHENE LAQUTION STEVENSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Town of Greenbush, Appellant, vs. City of Plymouth, imp., Respondent.

*September 16,*1938

February 7, *1939.*

*211For the appellant there was a brief by *Bassuener, Humke & Poole*of Sheboygan, and oral argument by *John M: Poole.*

*G. D. Ga-ynor,*city attorney, for the respondent.

A brief was also filed by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, as *amicus curice.*

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1938:

Fritz, J.

Upon the appeal to this court, the town of Greenbush contends that the Industrial Commission was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the proceeding commenced by the city of Plymouth under sec. 49.03 (8a) (a), Stats., because that section is unconstitutional for the reason that it purports to confer judicial powers on an agency other than a court contrary to the provisions of secs. 2 and 8 of art. VII, and sec. 5 of art. I of the constitution of this state. Those contentions cannot be sustained for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in *Holland v. Cedar Grove, ante,*p. 177, 282 N. W. 111.

However, as is also stated in that opinion, “sec. 49.03, Stats., makes no provision for an action by anyone except by the county where the relief is furnished against the munici*212pality of settlement. . . . The only action to be begun is by the county against which the relief is charged against the municipality of legal settlement. This clearly applies to counties and not to the municipality furnishing relief. . . . The whole proceeding began by the village of Cedar Grove filing a so-called complaint against the county of Sheboygan and the town of Holland. As already pointed out it was the duty of the county of Sheboygan to pay the claim and in the event that it refused to do so, the remedy of the village of Cedar Grove was by *mandamus*to compel the performance of a statutory duty.” Therefore we concluded in that case that the Industrial Commission had no power, under sec. 49.03, Stats., to try and determine the claim of the village of Cedar Grove against the town of Holland which was involved in that case. For the same reasons we must likewise conclude in this case that the proceedings instituted by the city of Plymouth before the Industrial Commission were wholly unauthorized, and that therefore everything that the commission undertook to do therein was unauthorized and void. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court confirming the commission’s determination must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to vacate the determination by the Industrial Commission without prejudice to the right of the city of Plymouth and the county of Sheboygan to assert such rights as they may have in a proper action or proceeding under the law.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on February *7,*1939.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS
E ASTLAND , T EXAS
J UDGMENT

Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak, * From the County Court at Law of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 1

- 1268

- 12

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00177

- CV * August 15, 2013
City of Abilene
, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has considered Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak’s motion for voluntary
dismissal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in
accordance with this court = s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Joseph “Joe” Walter Darlak.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

INSIGNIA SOLUTIONS PLC

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Insignia Solutions plc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. McMillan, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/   MARK E. MCMILLAN |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Mark E.  McMillan                 |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer          |   |
| November 14,  2003                |   |

 

1

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Leader and Japan Self-Defense Forces Chief of Joint Staff Address Students 

By Jeanette Steele U.S. Naval War College Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2016

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT
PARTICIPATING
1
09-1901
Seward Ship’s Drydock, Inc.
11/14/11
DFR
11/21/11,
04/17/13
Closed

2
10-1372
Briones Utility Co.
08/20/12
DFR
09/05/12
Closed

3
08-1774
Angelica Textile Services, Inc.
09/28/12
DFR
10/16/12
Closed

4
11-2395
Kiewit Power Constructors Co.
01/24/13
DFR
03/04/13
Closed

5
12-0643
K.M. Davis Contracting, Inc.
01/25/13
DFR
01/30/13
Closed


6

10-2096
United Contractors Midwest, Inc. d/b/a
R.A. Cullinan & Son

03/20/13

DFR

03/29/13

Closed

7
11-2780
Peacock Engineering, Inc.
05/22/13
DFR
05/30/13
Closed

8
11-1734
Calpine Corporation
06/24/13
DFR
06/26/13
Closed


9

10-0637
BP Products North America, Inc., & BP-Husky
Refining, LLC

09/16/13

DFR

11/01/13

Closed

10
11-2559
Jim Boyd Construction, Inc.
01/22/14
DFR
01/31/14
Closed

11
12-1600
Envision Waste
Services
02/10/14
DFR
02/24/14
04/16/14
Closed


12

13-1034
Empire Roofing
Company Southeast, LLC

04/11/14

DFR

05/05/14

Closed


13

12-2142
Meadows Construction Company, LLC

06/05/14

DFR

06/24/14

Closed

14
12-2385
Evergreen Construction Co.
08/11/14
DFR
10/24/14
Closed

15
12-1617
Houston Aquarium, Inc.
09/18/14
DFR
10/20/14
Closed


16

13-1022
Mid South Waffles, Inc., d/b/a
Waffle House #1283

12/31/14

DFR

02/03/15

Closed

17
14-0948
Florida Gas Contractors, Inc.
01/15/15
DFR
02/06/15
Closed

18
12-1287
CSA Equipment Company, LLC
01/16/15
DFR
02/09/15
Closed


Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on August 31, 2016

DOCKET NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S NAME
DOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING NOTICE
DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT
PARTICIPATING
19
13-0224
A.H. Sturgill Roofing, Inc.
03/23/15
DFR
04/08/15
Closed

20
13-1817
Missouri Basin Well Service Inc.
04/23/15
DFR
05/07/15
Closed

21
14-0844
Quick Transport of Arkansas, LLC
07/01/15
DFR
07/28/15
Closed

22
13-1124
Integra Health Management, Inc.
07/21/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

23
13-0900
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc.
08/31/15
DFR
09/18/15
Closed

24
13-1169
North Eastern Precast LLC
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

25
13-1170
Masonry Services Inc. dba MSI
10/29/15
DFR
11/02/15
Closed

26
13-0644
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed

27
13-0791
Wynnewood Refining Co., LLC
03/03/16
DFR
03/18/16
Closed


28

14-1688
Science Applications
International Corp., d/b/a SAIC

06/23/16

DFR



29
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR




30

15-1121
Dover High
Performance Plastics

07/19/16

DFR



*DFR – Direction for Review REM – Appellate Remand
INT REV - Interlocutory Review
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Department of Defense Issues Guidelines to Personnel on Coronavirus 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
From: ALDRIDGE Steve

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Knauf Insulation - 114 ICR Attachment 1 A & B

Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:38:08 PM

Attachments: Non CBI - Completed Knuaf Lanett WoolFib_Sec114_ Spreadsheet - Dec 2011 (2).xls

Non CBI - Completed Knauf Shasta WoolFib_Sec114_ Spreadsheet - Dec 2011 (2).xls

Cindy,

Per our phone conversation I have made the corrections as discussed and removed the CBI information

erroneously left in the non-CBI version sent to Susan Fairchild last month. .

Sorry for the trouble. Please let me know if these look OK.

Stephen R. Aldridge

Manager Corporate EH&S

KNAUFINSULATION

Tel: 866-445-2363, Ext. 8408 | Fax: 317-398-5501 | Mobile: 317-401-0564

-----Original Message-----

From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org]

Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:51 PM

To: ALDRIDGE Steve

Subject: FW: Knauf Insulation - 114 ICR Attachment 1 A & B

Steve,

We received these ICR forms from Susan Fairchild. In reviewing these files it seems that the Lanett

spreadsheet contains CBI. Could you please confirm that this is correct?

Regards,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623

Fax: (919) 316-3420

----- Forwarded by Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/18/2012 10:26 AM

-----

From: ALDRIDGE Steve <steve.aldridge@us.knaufinsulation.com>

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/16/2011 01:49 PM

Subject: Knauf Insulation - 114 ICR Attachment 1 A & B

Susan,

Please find attached Knauf Insulation’s completed Attachments A & B in non-CBI form. The CBI
versions will be FedEx’d on Monday to the appropriate address.

Please let me know if submittal via this email is sufficient for the non-CBI version. If not I can always

generate a disk and send it to you.

 Stephen R. Aldridge

 Manager Corporate EH&S

 KNAUFINSULATION

 Tel: 866-445-2363, Ext. 8408 | Fax: 317-398-5501 | Mobile:

 317-401-0564

 P Before printing, please think about the environment!

DISCLAIMER of Knauf Insulation: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be confidential

and/or privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.

If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. If you

have received this message in error please notify postmaster@us.knaufinsulation.com and delete the

message and any attachments accompanying it immediately. Although Knauf Insulation operates an

active anti-virus policy, the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted

by this e-mail. Please note that any views expressed in this e-mail may be those of the originator and

do not necessarily reflect those of the organization.(See attached file: Non CBI - Completed Knauf

Shelbyville WoolFib_Sec114_ Spreadsheet - Dec 2011 (2).xls)(See attached file: Non CBI - Completed

Knuaf Lanett WoolFib_Sec114_ Spreadsheet - Dec 2011 (2).xls)(See attached file: Non CBI - Completed

Knauf Shasta WoolFib_Sec114_ Spreadsheet - Dec 2011 (2).xls)
No. 86-87.

#### United States *v.*Salerno et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 929.] Motion of respondent Cafaro to join brief of respondent Salerno granted.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09068**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09068\09068_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09068\09068_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09068\09068_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09068\09068_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09068\09068_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09068\09068_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09068\Certification Statement_09068.pdf Plant certification statement x 09068\Supporting Documentation\09068_Part A MAP-1 - FINAL.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09068\Supporting Documentation\09068_Part A WB-1 - FINAL.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1093 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1093

To require the Federal Railroad Administration and the Federal Transit 
Authority to provide appropriate Congressional notice of safety audits 
     conducted with respect to railroads and rail transit agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2017

 Mr. Sires (for himself and Mr. Payne) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Railroad Administration and the Federal Transit 
Authority to provide appropriate Congressional notice of safety audits 
     conducted with respect to railroads and rail transit agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTICE OF SAFETY AUDITS.

    (a) Initial Notice.--Not later than 10 days after beginning a 
safety audit of a railroad or rail transit agency, the Federal Railroad 
Administration or the Federal Transit Authority shall notify the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate, and each member of Congress representing 
a State through which the railroad or transit agency operates service, 
of the beginning of that audit.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after completion of a safety 
audit described in subsection (a), the Federal Railroad Administration 
or the Federal Transit Authority shall transmit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, 
and to each member of Congress representing a State through which the 
railroad or transit agency operates service, a report describing the 
results of that audit.
                                 <all>
```
PETITION FOR RULEMAKING OF

E DWARD L. PERKINS

---------------------------------------------------------

COMES NOW Edward L. Perkins
, pro bono publico , and files this Petition for Rulemaking pursuant to

14 CFR 302.16.

Petitioner requests that the Department clarify and enforce its order (Docket No. DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0140) regarding airfare displays : Prices displayed for airline air/hotel packages must include the full price of the

hotel component as well as the full airfare in the total bundled price display.

The final ruling on fare displays ( in 14 CFR 399.84) explicitly states: “Any advertised price for air transportation, an air tour or an air tour component [emphasis added] must be the entire price to be paid by the customer for that transportation, tour or tour component.” When airlines (as well as OTAs) sell bundled air/hotel and air/hotel/car packages , they display the airfare component honestly, includ in g taxes and mandatory fees. But their bundled price displays routinely exclude mandatory hotel charges that travelers must pay upon arrival at the hotel

. Hotels label the most pernicious such charges “resort fees,”

but some hotels call them “housekeeping,” “concierge,” and other charges. In popular tourist areas such as Las Vegas and Hawaii these fees often reach $30 per night.

As with airline “fuel surcharges,” any mandatory hotel fee is actually an integral and undifferentiated part of the price. A lso a s with the airline case, carving out part of the real price, then featuring the artificially low remainder of the price

, seriously distorts price comparison and the purchase process. A pplying a plausible label to th e carve

- out, and listing supposed individua l components

, presumably makes the fees more palatable to unsuspecting consumers. But, in reality, the fees bear no direct relationship to the amenities provided. The labels just sound better than fees labeled for “air conditioning,” “elevators,” or

even “ the owner’ s private jet.”

Understating the true cost of an air/hotel package by as much as $30 per night is clearly deceptive. The Federal Trade Commission recognize s this form of deception, which it calls “drip pricing,” and on 11/28/2012 notified 22 major hotel chains of possible law violation

. In 1997, the Florida Attorney General specifically de s cribed a similar practice by cruiselines as “inherently deceptive.” Unfortunately,

n o hotel chain has yet responded to this FTC action.

Although the Department of Transportation lacks authority over hotel price advertising, in isolation, the

rul e says that the Department does have authority over total pricing when a hotel is offered as co mponent
of a package that includes air travel. Petitioner therefore requests that the Department clarify and enforce

its rule as written.

Respectfully submitted,

Edward L. Perkins

As Ed Perkins Syndicated travel columnist ; Consumer activist Retired Founding Editor, Consumer Reports Travel Letter

Box 8, Ashland OR 97520 eperkins@mind.net
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1214 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1214

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
   to conduct a program to use simplified procedures to issue public 
 assistance for certain projects under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
      Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disaster Simplified Assistance Value 
Enhancement Act'' or the ``Disaster SAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE PROGRAM.

    (a) Threshold.--The Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall immediately establish the threshold for 
eligibility pursuant to section 422(b)(2) of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5189(b)(2)) at 
$500,000.
    (b) Report.--Not later than May 1, 2021, the Administrator shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report containing the results of a 
comprehensive review of the program conducted under section 422 of the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5189), as modified by this section, to include an assessment of 
cost-effectiveness, speed of recovery, capacity of the grantees, past 
performance, and accountability measures.
    (c) Sunset.--This Act shall expire on September 30, 2021.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```