alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Andy Moring, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|Date: April 30, 2010 | /s/ ANDY MORING
                     Andy MoringExecutive Vice President — Finance and Chief
                   Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## iJ! l WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive Practices and UnfairMethods ofCompetition, and Violations ofPublic Charter Rules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair and Deceptive Practices and UnfairMethods of Competition, and Violations ofPublic CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT 

### ?8 

### 2: 28

DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly
·Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22,2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed byRespondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 

### There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: September 28, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

# tv~tv William J. Wagner

# ~ Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-7152I 

### • 3

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certify that on this 28th day ofSeptember, 2012, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder ChiefAdministrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 By First Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** Sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK BRADY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

TIMOTHY FISHBACK; JESUS

JUAREZ; SIMON VILLA;

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15609

D.C. No. 1:06-cv-00136-ALA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Arthur L. Alarcón, Circuit Judge, Presiding **

Submitted August 10, 2010 *** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

AUG 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Patrick Brady, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment to Defendants in Brady’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment. Lovell v.

Chandler, 303 F.3d 1039, 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Brady did not raise a triable issue

as to whether Defendants were deliberately indifferent. Brady’s disagreement with

prison doctors regarding his access to Ritalin medication does not constitute

deliberate indifference to his Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder

(“ADHD”). See Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989) (a difference of

opinion regarding medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

Moreover, whether Defendants had a written policy discontinuing Ritalin in the

California prison system is not a material issue of fact because Brady does not

demonstrate that Ritalin was the only way to treat Brady’s ADHD. Rather, it is

undisputed that Defendants prescribed another ADHD medication and continued to

treat Brady’s condition. See id. 

To the extent Brady attempts to appeal the denial of a claim under the

Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), this contention fails because he does not

develop any arguments on appeal; all of his substantive arguments on appeal
3 09-15609

concern his claims under section 1983, not the ADA. See United States v. Kimble ,

107 F.3d 712, 715 n.2 (9th Cir. 1997) (“because this argument was not coherently

developed in his briefs on appeal, we deem it to have been abandoned.”).

Finally, Brady’s contention that the district court failed to view the facts in

the light most favorable to Brady is without merit.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 1 

Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission

Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on February 28, 2022

 DOCKET

NUMBER

RESPONDENT'S

NAME

DOCKETED TYPE* BRIEFING

NOTICE 

DATE

BRIEFING 

STATUS

COMMISSIONER 

NOT 

PARTICIPATING

1 17-0737

UHS of Westwood Pembroke, 

Inc.

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

03/19/20 DFR 03/25/20 Closed

2 18-1451 Summit Contracting Group, Inc. 08/24/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

3 16-1713 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

4 16-1813 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

5 16-1872 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

6 17-0023 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

7 17-0279 United States Postal Service 08/31/20 DFR 09/25/20 Closed

8 16-1865 AJM Packaging Corporation 10/07/20 DFR 10/14/20 Closed

9 19-0723 Midwest Equipment Company 10/23/20 DFR 11/25/20 Closed

10 16-1587 TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 11/18/20 DFR 12/10/20 Closed

11 18-1864 Henkels & McCoy, Inc. 12/07/20 DFR 12/23/20 Closed

12 18-0242 Onekey, LLC 02/05/21 DFR 02/18/21 Open

13 18-0731

UHS of Delaware, Inc. and 

Premier Behavioral Health 

Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a 

Suncoast Behavioral Health 

Center

05/19/21 DFR 05/21/21 Closed

14 18-1287 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

15 18-1288 First Marine, LLC 05/19/21 DFR 05/27/21 Closed

16 18-0701 Midvale Paper Box Company, 

Inc. 10/21/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

17 20-0762 CentiMark Corporation 10/27/21 DFR 11/09/21 Closed

18 20-0653 Eastern Gas Transmission and 

Storage, Inc. 10/28/21 DFR 11/05/21 Open

19 19-0622 Anthony Marano Co. 02/10/22 DFR 02/16/22 Open

*DFR – Direction For Review

 REM – Appellate Remand

 INT REV – Interlocutory Review
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1247 

To extend the period of availability of the Multinational Species Conservation 

Funds Semipostal Stamp, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2017 

Mr. DONOVAN (for himself and Mr. CLAY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 

and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To extend the period of availability of the Multinational 

Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AVAILABILITY OF THE MULTI4 NATIONAL SPECIES CONSERVATION FUNDS 

5 SEMIPOSTAL STAMP. 

6 Subsection (c) of section 2 of the Multinational Spe7 cies Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Act of 2010 

8 (Public Law 111–241; 39 U.S.C. 416 note) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1247 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘6 years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘10 years’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end of the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(5) STAMP DEPICTIONS.—Members of the 

6 public shall be offered a choice of two stamps under 

7 this section, one depicting an African elephant and 

8 another depicting a tiger, respectively.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50473

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Julian Rivera, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:18-CR-283-14

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Julian Rivera appeals the sentence imposed for his conviction of 

conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 

methamphetamine. He argues that the written judgment conflicts with the 

district court’s oral pronouncement of the sentence because the written 

judgment contains 19 discretionary conditions of supervised release that were 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 17, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50473 Document: 00516361129 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2022
No. 21-50473

2

not orally pronounced at sentencing. Specifically, he challenges the eighth 

mandatory condition, the ninth mandatory condition, and all 17 standard 

conditions in the written judgment.

The district court failed to give Rivera adequate notice at sentencing 

that it was imposing the challenged conditions, and they must be excised 

from the written judgment to the extent they conflict with the district court’s 

oral pronouncement of the sentence. See United States v. Diggles, 957 F.3d 

551, 557-59 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc); United States v. Mudd, 685 F.3d 473, 

480 (5th Cir. 2012). The Government disputes whether the eighth and ninth 

mandatory conditions must be stricken despite our conclusion that the 

district court did not pronounce them at sentencing.

The eighth mandatory condition need not be excised because it is 

consistent with the district court’s oral pronouncement of a special 

assessment, the statute mandating the special assessment, and the district 

court’s intent that Rivera be required to pay the special assessment. See

Mudd, 685 F.3d at 480. The ninth mandatory condition and the 17 standard 

conditions must be excised. See Diggles, 957 F.3d at 557-59; Mudd, 685 F.3d 

at 480.

Accordingly, we VACATE in part and REMAND for the district 

court to amend the written judgment in accordance with this opinion. In all 

other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50473 Document: 00516361129 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0082

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

SONNY JOE PAULEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 18, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 12 2024

09/12/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0082
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jay S. Wintrob, Chief Executive Officer of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b)  [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: April 15,2005       /s/ JAY S. WINTROB    Jay S. Wintrob  Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

         Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time
it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such
registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition
such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among
others, an accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part
of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in
connection with the registration statement.

         American Science and Engineering, Inc. (the "Company") decided to no
longer engage Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent auditors,
effective July 18, 2002. For additional information, see the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company
has been unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by
reference into the Company's previously filed registration statements on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-13259, 333-05795, 333-05797, 333-53842, 333-69717,
333-27927, 333-27929, 333-09257, and 333-91801) and on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 033-61903 and their respective related prospectuses (collectively, the
"Registration Statements") of Andersen's audit report with respect to the
Company's consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2002 and for the
two years in the period then ended.

         Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits
the Company to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by
reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from
Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in the Company's securities
pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date that
this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the
financial statements audited by Andersen or any omissions of a material fact
required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a
claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1160 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1160

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

   Mr. Kilmer (for himself and Ms. Jenkins of Kansas) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ACO Assignment Improvement Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIARIES UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM.

    Section 1899(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395jjj(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) in the case of performance years beginning on or 
        after January 1, 2019, primary care services provided under 
        this title by an ACO professional described in subsection 
        (h)(1)(B).''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S 10Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                           6,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,805
<PP&E>                                          10,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,970
<SALES>                                         67,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,637
<CGS>                                           34,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>