alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Combat Logistics Battalion 31 Explosive Ordnance Disposal Marines Refine Counter-improvised Explosive Device Tactics

By Lance Cpl. Jonah Baase31st Marine Expeditionary Unit

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MATTHEW J. CRAIG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-729

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg 

Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2009-CF-012402-AXXX-MB.

Matthew Craig, Malone, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
         drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Federal-State

              

 Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle Class Tax Relief and Job 
Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing Appropriate Occupations 
for Drug Testing of Unemployment Compensation Applicants'' (published 
at 81 Fed. Reg. 50298 (August 1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no 
force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
         drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants.
```
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Oct. 27, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>We are aware of the ballistic missile launches and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launches highlight the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)I, Robert W. Pawlak, the Chief Financial Officer of Cohesant Inc. (the “Company”), certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;  (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  (4) The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
 

 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and (5) The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the Company’s internal controls over financialreporting.        /s/ Robert W. Pawlak   Robert W. Pawlak   Cohesant Inc.Chief Financial Officer   April 11, 2008
No. 91-5999.

#### Forgione *v.*Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of DRAVCO MINING INC. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rodney Lozinski, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.









|/s/Rodney Lozinski                                 
|---------------------------------------------------
|Rodney Lozinski                                    
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|March 30, 2004
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-45324, No. 33-57339,No. 333-108312, No. 333-111093 and No. 333-112450), and S-8 (No. 2-96127, No. 33-24068, No. 33-41434, No. 33-53733, No. 33-55449, No. 33-45970, No. 33-14458, No. 33-50149, No. 33-55456,No. 333-15509, No. 333-76939, No. 333-67008, No. 333-64154, No. 333-59668, No. 333-89318, No. 333-98619, No. 333-98623, No. 333-125005 and No. 333-133814) of Wyeth of our report datedFebruary 22, 2007 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in theAnnual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

     Florham Park, New Jersey 

     February 23, 2007
Exhibit 23.1
  Consent
    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    (1)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8,
    No. 333-138541)
    pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive
    Plan, the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2006 Director
    Option Plan of Acme Packet, Inc.,(2)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8,
    No. 333-151507)
    pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the
    2006 Director Option Plan of Acme Packet, Inc.,(3)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8,
    No. 333-157944)
    pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the
    2006 Director Option Plan of Acme Packet, Inc.,(4)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-3,
    No. 333-159613)
    and related Prospectus of Acme Packet, Inc. for the registration
    of 2,874,383 shares of its common stock, and(5)
    Registration Statement
    (Form S-8,
    No. 333-165372)
    pertaining to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the
    2006 Director Option Plan of Acme Packet, Inc.;  (Form 10-K)
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLPBoston, MassachusettsFebruary 18, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# How the Marine Corps is Leading the Way in the Information Environment

By Cpl. Alexis BetancesIII MEF Information Group 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1277 

To permit indefinite extensions for certain previously extended Medicaid 

managed care waivers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2017 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To permit indefinite extensions for certain previously 

extended Medicaid managed care waivers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Medicaid Waiver 

5 Flexibility Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANDFATHERING CERTAIN MEDICAID MANAGED 

7 CARE WAIVERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a State with a 

9 grandfathered managed care waiver, the State may con10 tinue to implement the managed care delivery system that 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1277 IH

1 is the subject of such waiver in perpetuity under the State 

2 plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act (or a waiv3 er of such plan) without submitting an application to the 

4 Secretary for a new waiver to implement such managed 

5 care delivery system, so long as the terms and conditions 

6 of the waiver involved are not modified. If the State seeks 

7 to modify the terms or conditions of such a waiver, the 

8 State shall submit to the Secretary an application for ap9 proval of a new waiver under such modified terms and con10 ditions. 

11 (b) STATE WITH A GRANDFATHERED MANAGED

12 CARE WAIVER DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

13 ‘‘State with a grandfathered managed care waiver’’ means 

14 a State— 

15 (1) with a waiver approved by the Secretary of 

16 Health and Human Services under section 1915(b) 

17 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u–2(b)) 

18 with respect to the authority of the State to imple19 ment a managed care delivery system under the 

20 State plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act 

21 (or under a waiver of such plan under section 1115 

22 of such Act) that is in effect as of January 1, 2017; 

23 and 

24 (2) the renewal of such waiver was approved no 

25 less than two times. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1277 IH

1 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec2 tion shall be construed, with respect to a waiver approved 

3 by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under 

4 section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315), 

5 to allow for the continued application in perpetuity of such 

6 waiver with respect to any aspect of the implementation 

7 of the Medicaid program under title XIX of such Act in 

8 such State other than the authority of the State to imple9 ment a managed care delivery system in such State. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
( O R D E RL IST : 5 52 U.S .) T U E S DAY, OCTO BE R 1 6, 20 07 O RD E RIN PE ND IN G CASE 0 7A 3 1 1 N O R R I S, DIR ., A RDOC, ET AL. V. J O N ES, JACKH . T h ea ppl ica ti on tova ca teth e s t ay of exe cu ti on of se nt enc e o f de ath en te re d b yt h eU nit ed St at es Cou rto fA ppe al s forth e E i g h t h C irc ui t on Oct ob er11 , 2 0 0 7 , pr ese nt ed toJu st ic e A lit o a n d b yh im re fe rre d t o th e C our t, i s d eni ed . J u s t i ce Sca li a, di sse nt in g. I v o t et og r a n tth e S t a t e ’s app li ca tio n t o va cat e t h es tay b e c a u se in myv iewth e de cis ion o f theEi gh th Ci rcu itwas bas ed o n th e m ist ak en pr emi set hatou r gr antofc e r tio rar i in Ba ze v. Re es , ___ S . Ct . ___ (2 00 7), ca ll s for th e st ay of ev er y e x e c u tio n i n wh ich an i n d ivi dua l ra ise s a n Ei ght h Am e n d men t c h a l l eng e t o th e l eth al i nje cti on p rot oco l. Thegr an t of c e r t i ora ri in a si ngl e ca se doe s no t a lte r th e a ppl ic at ion of n o r m a l r ule s ofpr oce du re , i ncl ud in g t hos e re lat ed tot ime lin es s. I n th is cas e, J one s’s c h a lle nget o thele th al in jec ti on pr oto co l, w h i c h wa s b r o u g ht nin e ye ars af te r his co nv ic tio n a n d s ent enc e b e c am ef ina l, w as dil at or y.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

EFFECTIVE DATE:  AS OF JANUARY 1, 2001

WOOLEY:          JOHN C. WOOLEY

COMPANY:         SCHLOTZSKY'S, INC., a Texas corporation
                 203 Colorado Street
                 Austin, Texas  78701

AGREEMENT:       Amended and Restated  Employment  Agreement,  effective as of
                 January 1, 2001, by and between WOOLEY and COMPANY.

WHEREAS, the Parties listed above entered into the AGREEMENT described above;
and

WHEREAS, WOOLEY and COMPANY have determined that it is in their mutual best
interest to modify the terms of the AGREEMENT;

NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual obligations contained herein and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1.   EFFECT OF AMENDMENT. The AGREEMENT is hereby supplemented and modified by
the provisions of this First Amendment to Employment Agreement ("AMENDMENT").
Wherever there is any conflict between the provisions of the AGREEMENT and the
provisions of this AMENDMENT, the provisions of this AMENDMENT are paramount and
shall control, and the AGREEMENT shall be construed accordingly. Any terms that
are defined in the AGREEMENT shall have the same meanings in this AMENDMENT. Any
provision in the AGREEMENT not expressly changed by or inconsistent with the
provisions of this AMENDMENT shall remain the same.

2.   AMENDMENT OF ADVANCE. The AGREEMENT is hereby amended to restate
PARAGRAPH 5. as follows:

     5. ADVANCE. On or before January 31, 2001, the Company shall pay Wooley a
cash advance against Wooley's future bonuses earned in the amount of $150,000.
The advance shall be recovered by applying the following amounts until the full
amount is recovered: $50,000 of the 2002 bonus, $50,000 of the 2003 bonus, and
$50,000 of the 2004 bonus. If all or any portion of the advance remains after
application of the 2004 bonus, such remainder shall be deemed fully earned by
Wooley and not to be recovered by the Company.

<Page>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this original of this
AMENDMENT to be effective on the EFFECTIVE DATE.

COMPANY:
SCHLOTZSKY'S, INC.,
a Texas corporation

By:
       ----------------------------------
       Richard H. Valade
Title: Chief Financial Officer                      Date: 1/4/02
       Executive Vice President & Treasurer

WOOLEY:

                                                    Date: 12/28/01
-----------------------------------------
John C. Wooley

                                        2
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on July 31, 2019
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
14-1688
Science Applications International Corp., d/b/a SAIC
06/23/16
DFR
10/31/16
Closed

2
15-1121
Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.
06/30/16
DFR
11/09/16
Closed

3
14-1268
Dover High Performance Plastics
07/19/16
DFR
11/01/16
Closed

4
15-1347
Gate Precast Co.
11/10/16
DFR 
12/05/16
Closed

 5
 16-1533
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, d/b/a Blakeley Boatworks, Inc.
 04/27/17
DFR
04/27/17
Closed




 6
16-0803
The Lane Construction Corporation 
05/23/17
DFR
09/14/17
Closed

 7
16-1167
Aerospace Testing Alliance
08/22/17
DFR
11/20/17
Closed

 8
15-1069
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc.
10/27/17
DFR
11/13/17
   Closed

 9
16-0940
Angel Brothers Enterprises, Ltd.
11/17/17
DFR
12/15/17
Closed

10
17-0190
Shelly & Sands, Inc.
05/02/18
DFR
05/10/18
Closed

11
15-1574
MasTec North America dba MasTec Advanced Technologies, Inc.
06/20/18
DFR
07/10/18
Closed

12
17-0949
Walmart, Inc.
07/12/18
DFR
08/09/18
   Closed

13
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
10/16/18
DFR
10/30/18
Closed

14
17-1214
Mansfield Industrial, Inc.
11/23/18
DFR
01/03/19
Closed

15
17-0483
Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
11/28/18
DFR
12/19/18
Closed

16
16-1628
Schaad Detective Agency, Inc.
12/18/18
DFR
01/07/19
Closed

17
17-1174
Wayne Farms, LLC
03/01/19
DFR
03/21/19
Closed

18
17-2144
Tampa Electric Company
04/09/19
DFR
04/23/19
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 98-30676 Conference Calendar

__________________ MILDRED BARROIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GOUX ENTERPRISES, INC., doing business as Pontchartrain Health Centre, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-175-D

- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mildred Barrois appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of her complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Barrois, a Louisiana citizen, alleged that Goux Enterprises, which operated a nursing home in Mandeville, La., mistreated her since-deceased husband, Victor, while he resided at the nursing home and that Goux “blocked” her application to the Social Security Administration to become Victor’s “representative payee.” The district court did not err in holding that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Barrois’sNo. 98-30676 -2- claims. See F ED . R. C IV . P. 12(h)(3). Inasmuch as she was raising a claim regarding Social Security benefits, Barrois did not invoke the federal-question jurisdiction of the district court because she failed to demonstrate that she had exhausted administrative remedies provided the Social Security Administration. See Paul v. Shalala , 29 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994). Moreover, Barrois has not invoked the diversity jurisdiction of the court because she has failed to sustain her burden of proving that complete diversity exists. See Getty Oil Corp., Div. of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North Am. , 841 F.2d 1254, 1258-59 (5th Cir. 1988); 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Because this appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This is Barrois’ second frivolous lawsuit and appeal involving the same subject matter. Accordingly, we caution Barrois that any further suits or appeals involving these matters will result in sanctions. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.