alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129577 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129577 

 COA: 262931 

Muskegon CC: 03-049444-FH

ROBERT MILTON SEVREY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
#### Smith, Appellant, vs. Weigand and another, Respondents.

*February 12*

March *10, 1931.*

*209For the appellant there were briefs by *Alexander Wiley*and *Robert L. Wiley,*both of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by *Alexander Witey.*

*Roy P. Wilcox*of Eau Claire, for the respondents.

Nelson, J.

This case, and the case of Anna Kruse v. Arthur J. Weigand and Ray Wilcox, decided herewith *(ante,*p. 195, 235 N. W. 426), were tried together. This case, therefore, is ruled by the decision in the case in which Anna Kruse was plaintiff.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed. No costs to be taxed, except clerk’s fees to be taxed against appellant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Addison, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 462]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Keegan, J.), rendered May 11, 1993, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defendant stands convicted following a jury trial of burglary in the second degree, based on allegations that in the early morning hours of June 18, 1992, defendant climbed through the window of a private residence on Park Avenue in the City of Albany, intending to commit a crime. Defendant was sentenced as a predicate felon to an indeterminate period of *783incarceration of 71⁄2 to 15 years. Defendant contends that his judgment of conviction should now be reversed on the ground that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to sustain it. We disagree.

The victim testified that she awoke on the morning in question to find a man, answering defendant’s description, standing in her bedroom door. The man was unknown to both the victim and her two female roommates, none of whom had given him permission to enter the premises. The victim later noticed that a chair had been removed from her porch and positioned under a kitchen window, in an apparent effort to gain entry to the residence.

Detective Timothy Carroll of the Albany Police Department then testified that he had lifted latent fingerprints from the door jamb of the victim’s bedroom. James Ruszas of the State Division of Criminal Justice Services testified that his analysis of the fingerprints lifted by Carroll disclosed that there were 13 points of comparison between the latent fingerprints and those of defendant. Ruszas stated that only 8 points of comparison are usually required to confirm a match. We find that the combined testimony of these witnesses clearly constituted sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding defendant guilty of second degree burglary *(see, People v Ivory,*99 AD2d 154, 157; *see also, People v Mackey,*49 NY2d 274, 278-280).

Defendant’s remaining contention that he received ineffective assistance *of*counsel at trial based on defense counsel’s failure to move for dismissal of the indictment on the ground that its terms were too general is equally without merit. Our review of the indictment discloses that it is valid on its face and does not suffer from the lack of specificity charged by defendant *(see, People v Mackey, supra,*at 278). Defense counsel’s failure to object to the indictment cannot, therefore, be characterized as a failure to provide defendant with an adequate legal defense in that "defense counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to make a meritless motion” *(People v Meslin,*201 AD2d 744, *lv denied*83 NY2d 913).

Mikoll, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended March 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ludger Viefhues, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: May 17, 2006 | /s/ Ludger Viefhues
                     Ludger ViefhuesChief Financial Officer
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements of Agway Inc. on Form S-3 (No.  333-59808) and (No. 333-62509) and on
Form S-8  (No333-93531) of our report dated August 17, 2001,  except for Note 9,
as to which the date is September 14, 2001, relating to the financial statements
and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Syracuse, New York
September 18, 2001
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H67-H68]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 3 o'clock and 14 minutes

[[Page H68]]

p.m.), the House adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, January 8, 2009, 
at 10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
United States of America 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036-3457 

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

Complainant, 

OSHRC Docket No. 12-0318 

v. 

TORRE MACKLE GROUP, LLC, 

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE 

The Commission requests that the parties address whether the judge erred in 

affirming Citation 1, Item 1, which alleged a serious violation of 29 C.F.R. 

§ 1926.501(c)(3) (protection from falling objects). In particular, the parties are asked to 

brief the issues raised in the respondent’s petition for discretionary review. 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are 

before the Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The first brief 

review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so 

choose. 

1 

is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief 

must notify the Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the 

applicable time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for 

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the lefthand margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. 

The Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the 

opposing party. Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only 

if appropriate. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

filing briefs (or similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date 

of service. 

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION 

Dated: October 4, 2012	 /s/____________________________ 

John X. Cerveny 

Deputy Executive Secretary 

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S399]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 10 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
stand adjourned under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 8:35 p.m., adjourned until 
Thursday, January 15, 2009, at 10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
No. 82-771.

#### Union Oil Company of California et al. *v.*United States Department of Energy et al.

Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2010
/s/Daniel W. HollisName:  Daniel W. Hollis

Title:  Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive)





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KMS RESTAURANT CORP.
, Appellant,

v.

KATZMAN WASSERMAN BENNARDINI & RUBINSTEIN, P.A. f/k/a

KATZM AN WASSERMAN & BENNARDINI, P.A., STEVEN M. KATZMAN, ESQ. and CRAIG RUBINSTEIN, individually

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 3664

[ July 27, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Thomas H. Barkdull

, III , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502011CA010384

- XXXX

- MB

.

Frederick J. Keitel, III, Palm Beach, for appellant.

A ndrew J. Marchese of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, K UNTZ

, JJ., and C YNAMON

, A BBY , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## UAS Flight Log SAMPLE
Make: DJI Vision 2+ CAUCHI PHOTOGRAPHY Model: PV331

Year: 2014 Vehicle ID Number: PH645273496

Date of Service Hrs at Service Work Performed and Service Schedule By Cost Notes 11/27/14 5 Replace 2 propellers (black) JC $ 0
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

            SECTION 906 -- CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and in connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Doane Pet Care Company for the quarter ended June 28, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer of Doane Pet Care Company hereby certifies
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Doane Pet Care Company.

Date: July 30, 2003

                                           /s/ Douglas J. Cahill
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Douglas J. Cahill
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Doane Pet Care Company








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Doane Pet Care Company and will be
retained by Doane Pet Care Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Fac ID Facility Name**  **Street City**  **County State**  **Zip**

74 APACHE STAINLESS EQUIPMENT CORP. 200 W . INDUSTRIAL DR.

BEAVER DAM

DODGE WI 53916 4702 Astra Plating 1535 W . Pierce St. Milwaukee WI 53204 96 ASTRO INDS. INC. 810 PARKVIEWRD. GREEN BAY

BROW N WI 54304 182 CHILTON PLATING CO. INC. 420 E. MAIN ST. CHILTON CALUMET WI 53014 196 CHROMETECH OF W ISCONSIN 10020 S. 54TH ST. FRANKLIN MILWAUKEE WI 53132 380 Griep, Inc., Tri-City Plating 2237 LIBERTY AVENUE/ HW Y 81 BELOIT WI 53511 426 HYDRO-PLATERS INC. 3525 W . KIEHNAU AVE. MILWAUKEE

MILWAUKEE

WI 53209 438 INDIANHEAD PLATING INC. 1610 PALMER ST. CHIPPEWA FALLS

CHIPPEWA

WI 54729 473 JAGEMANN PLATING COMPANY 1324 S. 26TH MANITOW OC

MANITOW OC

WI 54220 537 Master Lock Co. 2600 N 32ND MILWAUKEE WI 53210 5044 Metalplate & Products Inc. 2900 W est Vliet Street Milwaukee WI 53208 584 MILWAUKEE PLATING CO. 1434 N. 4TH ST. MILWAUKEE

MILWAUKEE

WI 53212 5072 National Plating Co. 1565 W est Bruce Street Milwaukee WI 53204 1290 5090 Oshkosh Plating Services, Inc. 1228 W . South Park Ave. Oshkosh WI 54901 665 PHILLIPS PLATING CORP. 984 N. LAKE AVE. PHILLIPS PRICE WI 54555 5113 Plating Engineering Co. 1928 S. 62nd St. Milwaukee Milwaukee WI 53234 1187 735 RACINE PLATING 620 STANNARD ST. RACINE RACINE WI 53403 792 SCOT INDS. 810 E. NEBRASKA ST. MUSCODAGRANT WI 53573 809 SK W ILLIAMS CO. 4600 N. 124TH ST. WA UWATOSA

MILWAUKEE

WI 53225 817 SOUTHW EST METAL FINISHING - Dakota East 2795 S. 166TH ST.

NEWBERLIN

WA UKESHA

WI 53151 5200 Standard Plating Co., Inc. 5734 W est Florist Ave. Milwaukee WI 53218 911 U.S. CHROME CORP. OF W ISCONSIN 650 OAK PARK AVE. FOND DU LAC

FOND DU LAC

WI 54935 913 ULTRA PLATING 345 S. PEARL ST. GREEN BAY

BROW N WI 54306 969 WI SCONSIN PLATING W ORKS INC. 931 CARROLL ST. PLANT 1 RACINE RACINE WI 53403**Hard Decorative**  **An odizing** 

X

X X

X

X

X 53204 1290

X 53234 1187 X X

X X

X

X X

X
## Settlement Talks Mandatory in Pilot Program for Complex Job Safety Cases

 

 

 

 

**SETTLEMENT TALKS MANDATORY IN PILOT PROGRAM FOR COMPLEX JOB SAFETY CASES**

Employers who receive job safety or health citations that include proposed penalties of $200,000 or more must participate in formal settlement talks under a pilot program, according to Stuart E. Weisberg, head of the federal agency that decides such cases. Referred to as the Settlement Part, the rules were published in the February 19, 1999 Federal Register (64 FR 8243-8247).  The new part supplements the agency's settlement judge procedure and will be evaluated after one year to determine if requiring litigants to appear before a settlement judge speeds resolution.

When employers contest workplace safety citations, they are not required to correct allegedly unsafe conditions until the Review Commission issues a final decision; thus settlement often brings swifter correction of potential workplace hazards. The new settlement procedure provides for a negotiation period of 120 days and for a one-time, 30 day extension of that time at the judge's discretion.

Settlement negotiations will be presided over by a judge who will not hear the case should the effort fail to resolve the issues.  OSHRC's Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) may act as a settlement judge or appoint another judge to do so. Four judges have been trained in settlement techniques and procedures -- Chief ALJ Irving Sommer and  ALJs Benjamin R. Loye, Stephen J. Simko, Jr. and Robert A. Yetman.  Decisions on assigning a settlement judge or ending settlement efforts are not subject to review. To enhance the chances of success, settlement conferences must be attended by officials with the authority to settle. Information and documents shared during such negotiations will be confidential and protected from later disclosure unless all parties agree.

The Review Commission is the independent federal adjudicatory agency that issues decisions in disputes arising from citations issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. By providing the Settlement Part as a more structured and formal setting in the preliminary stages of cases to promote the resolution of disputes, it believes litigation costs may be reduced in both the judicial hearing and review processes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                135,549
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      24,957,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                        1,540,554
<INVENTORY>                                        11,517,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   36,745,920
<PP&E>                                              7,159,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                      4,829,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     62,271,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              25,233,922
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               40,103
<OTHER-SE>                                          7,509,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       62,271,732
<SALES>                                            64,565,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   64,565,793
<CGS>                                              38,801,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      21,486,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       62,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,941,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,272,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                          626,092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   646,604
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                          (1,015,550)
<NET-INCOME>                                         (368,946)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.10)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,200
<SECURITIES>                                    11,132
<RECEIVABLES>                                      435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,487
<PP&E>                                           1,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,811
<SALES>                                            708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   708
<CGS>                                            1,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,192)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
        

</TABLE>
Date: March 19, 2015 

Meeting: Hawaii Electric 

Rule(s) Discussed: 

Written Materials? Yes/No 

~--------------~-------------~--------------~ 

Name Organization 

--=---...!....__\.:-------=------i---=- ll1tN __:__ 

N e.ss r~Af'l 

-Hawn 'f::;T~~Q....> 

I I 

I I 

If 

I } 

Phone Number 

zoz.. 2-'16 t<t 3o 

8'0~ 6L(-?; - L}'f!] C' 

'J.f) 2 ~ ~ ~ r _, g 6! 

---~--------------4---------------~