alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Douglas J. Cahill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doane Pet CareCompany, hereby certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Doane Pet CareCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004        /s/ DOUGLAS J. CAHILL       Douglas J. Cahill   President and Chief Executive Officer   Doane Pet Care Company
##### 



Exhibit 10.11.1

February 27, 2001

Stephen A. Herman, Esq.
Senior Vice President General Counsel
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road, 13th Flr.
Bethesda, MD 20814-6161

Dear Steve:

You are an essential member of our senior executive team and I view your
contribution as vital to getting the Corporation through its current
challenges, achieving the Corporations objectives, and providing strong
returns to shareholders.

The Board of Directors recently approved a Senior Executive Retention program
which includes you. Under this program, you will receive a grant of phantom
PG&E Corporation restricted stock units granted under the PG&E Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan. The amount of your grant is $1,250,000 and it
translates into 95,715 units calculated at the closing price of PG&E
Corporation common stock on February 21, 2001, of $13.06 per share. An
extremely small number of individuals are included in this arrangement. For
this reason, it is absolutely necessary for you to restrict any conversation on
this subject to me, Brent Stanley, or Tom Boren.

Your grant of phantom PG&E Corporation restricted stock units is effective
February 21, 2001, and will vest on December 31, 2004, subject to either one of
the following conditions:



| |  | 50 percent will automatically vest on December 31, 2004. The remaining
50 percent will vest on December 31, 2004 only if the Corporations
performance, as measured by relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) on a
cumulative basis over four years, is at or above the 55th percentile of
its comparator group; or
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
| |  | if, at the end of the third year of the grant, December 31, 2003, the
Corporations performance as measured by relative TSR on a cumulative
basis, is at or above the 75th percentile of its comparator group, the
entire grant will vest.                                                                          

You may elect to defer your actual award payments under the PG&E Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan prior to the award cliff-vesting. Such
deferrals will be made in PG&E Corporation phantom stock units





---



##### 



Stephen A. Herman
February 27, 2001
Page 2

on the first
business day of January of the year following vesting. Awards not deferred
will be paid in cash in January of the year following vesting.

If a monetizing event occurs (i.e., IPO or sale) which affects NEG, you will be
given the opportunity of exchanging your grant of phantom PG&E corporation
stock units under this program for an equity-type interest of comparable value
in the new entity.

Steve, I look forward to your continued strong contributions to PG&E
Corporations success.

Sincerely,

/s/ Bob Glynn
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN TRIPODI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-17

[November 19, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432016CF000692A.

John Tripodi, Perry, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina JimenezOrosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 'Iron Rangers' Hone Skills during Counter Weapon of Mass Destruction Training

By Capt. Jonathan Camire 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 658 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-316, K2025-314.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26604 Filed 11-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 10.8

Severance Benefit letters in the form attached hereto were given by the Company
to 31 of its employees, including Anthony M. Vincent.

<PAGE>



TO:                                                            November 7, 1996

FROM:  John L. Morgan

                               SEVERANCE BENEFIT

        As you know, the Company recently announced a possible sale of the
Company (the Transaction). This letter describes the severance benefit that the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved in contemplation
that the Transaction will be completed.

        You have been selected to participate in the American Filtrona
Corporation Severance Benefit Plan (the Severance Plan). A summary plan
description for the Severance Plan will be distributed in the near future.
You will receive a severance benefit if (a) your employment with the Company
and its Affiliates is terminated without Cause before the second anniversary of
the Control Change Date or (b) you resign from the Company and its Affiliates
with Good Reason before the second anniversary of the Control Change Date.

        Your benefit under the Severance Plan will equal 100% of your base
pay as in effect on the date you terminate employment or the Control Change
Date, whichever is larger. Your benefit will be paid in a single sum, in
cash. Applicable income and employment taxes will be deducted from the
severance benefit.

        The terms "Affiliate," "Control Change Date," "Cause" and "Good
Reason" are defined in the Severance Plan. Those definitions will also be
included in the SPD.

        The Compensation Committee approved the Severance Plan subject to the
completion of the Transaction. No payments will be made under the Severance

<PAGE>

Plan if the Transaction is not completed. In addition, the Compensation
Committee reserved the right to amend or withdraw the Severance Plan at any time
before the completion of the Transaction.
AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 3


THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made effective as of the 8 th day of March, 2016.


BETWEEN:


ONCOYLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.,


("OBUS")


- and -


GEORGE M. GILL, M.D.


(the "Employee")


WHEREAS the Employee is an officer of OBUS whose terms of employment are set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated effective January 1, 2011;


AND WHEREAS OBUS and the Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement;


NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:


Section 1 - Amendments





The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 3(1) with the following:





“Commencing January 1, 2016, OBUS shall pay to the Employee a salary of THREE HUNDRED THIRTY EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY ($338,890) U.S. DOLLARS per annum, exclusive of bonuses, benefits and other compensation, payable in equal installments of FOURTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS AND FORTY TWO CENTS ($14,120.41) U.S. DOLLARS on the 15 th and last day of each month.”





Section 2 - Effective Date





(1)    This Amending Agreement shall be effective from and after January 1, 2016.





(2)    In all other respects the parties confirm that the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.


ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.Per:/s/ Alan TuchmanAlan TuchmandDirectorPer:/s/ Giles GosselinGiles GosselinDirector





/s/ George GillGEORGE M. GILL, M.D.
S· DEPARTMENT OF THE ADS-16-l 

Fl1J 25 

Title: 

Office of surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Directive 

ADS-16, dated August 3, 1992, is changed to delete paragraph 

4c(6), pertaining to the composition of and responsibilities 

assigned to the Uniform Committee. With the recently enacted 

changes to the composition and calor of the uniform, the 

committee has served its purpose and is hereby disbanded. 

CHANGE NOTICE
EXHIBIT 99.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ludger
Viefhues, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



August 14, 2002                   /S/ LUDGER VIEFHUES
                                  -----------------------------
                                  Ludger Viefhues
                                  Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

h0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148414

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148414

COA: 314449

Calhoun CC: 2010-003471-FH

QWAN DELL EDISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE COMPARISON INQUIRY REPORT – 137

January 4, 1990

Richard D. McNabb, Director

Indiana Department of Natural Resources

Division of Reclamation

309 W. Washington Street, Suite 201

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

TOPIC: UPDATED INFORMATION ON BOND RATES

INQUIRY: What are the current bond rates set by other states?

SEARCH RESULTS: A list of bonding requirements for individual states was prepared in 

September, 1989 by Gary Behrns, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Land Reclamation 

Commission. Gary conducted a telephone survey of 22 states, requesting the following 

information:

1. The dollar per acre bonding rate required for surface coal mining permits. 

2. The existence of alternate bonding plans, such as bonding severance taxes, bond pools or 

bond funds. 

3. If bond funds exist, are they tied to phase I bonding? Can it be spent on phase I 

reclamation? 

A copy of the results of the survey are attached.

Additional information on bonding programs may be found in REPORT 124 (August 7, 1989).

ATTACHMENTS

A. BONDING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUAL STATES, a survey prepared by Gary 

Behrns, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Land Reclamation Commission 

(Sept., 1989). 

B. COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 124 (August 7, 1989). Bonding programs.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Stephen C. Donnelly, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emtec, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
  and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
  end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of
  an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
  registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/ Stephen C. Donnelly      
| |  |                              
| |  | Stephen C. Donnelly          
| |  | Chief Financial Officer      
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)

Date:
  November 30, 2006



---
AMENDING AGREEMENT NO. 2


THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT made effective as of the 12 th day of March, 2015.


BETWEEN:


ONCOYLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.,


("OBUS")


- and -


GEORGE M. GILL, M.D.


(the "Employee")


WHEREAS the Employee is an officer of OBUS whose terms of employment are set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement ("Employment Agreement") dated effective January 1, 2011;


AND WHEREAS OBUS and the Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement;


NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amending Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:


Section 1 – Amendments





The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 3(1) with the following:





“Commencing January 1, 2015, OBUS shall pay to the Employee a salary of THREE HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FOURTY-TWO DOLLARS AND TWELVE CENTS ($316,742.12) U.S. DOLLARS per annum, exclusive of bonuses, benefits and other compensation, payable in equal installments of THIRTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND FIFTY-NINE CENTS ($13,197.59) U.S. DOLLARS on the 15 th and last day of each month.”











Section 2 – Effective Date





(1)    This Amending Agreement shall be effective from and after January 1, 2015.





(2)    In all other respects the parties confirm that the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.


ONCOLYTICS BIOTECH (U.S.), INC.Per:/s/ Mary Ann DillahuntyMary Ann DillahuntyPresidentPer:/s/ Kirk LookKirk LookChief Financial Officer





/s/ Margaret Kowalczewski/s/ George M. GillWITNESSGEORGE M. GILL, M.D.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-044-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|   | May 10, 2006 | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                            |   |
|--------|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         | Graham V. Smith                                                |
|   |         | Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will beretained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----