alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1100 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate copayments by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for medicines relating to preventive 

health services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2017 

Mr. ZELDIN (for himself and Ms. GABBARD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate copayments by the Department of Veterans Affairs for medicines relating to preventive health services, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Preventive 

5 Health Coverage Fairness Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1100 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT TO PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES 

2 FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

3 AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) ELIMINATION OF MEDICATION COPAYMENTS.— 

5 Section 1722A(a)(3) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

9 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(E) medication that is or is part of a preven13 tive health service.’’. 

14 (b) ELIMINATION OF HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL

15 SERVICES COPAYMENTS.—Section 1710 of such title is 

16 amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (f)— 

18 (A) by redesignating paragraph (5) as 

19 paragraph (6); and 

20 (B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the 

21 following new paragraph (5): 

22 ‘‘(5) A veteran shall not be liable to the United 

23 States under this subsection for any amounts for 

24 preventive health services.’’; and 

25 (2) in subsection (g)(3), by adding at the end 

26 the following new subparagraph: 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1100 IH

1 ‘‘(C) Preventive health services.’’. 

2 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 1701(9) of such title is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (J), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

5 and inserting a semicolon; 

6 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (K) as sub7 paragraph (N); and 

8 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (J) the fol9 lowing new subparagraphs: 

10 ‘‘(K) evidence-based items or services that 

11 have in effect a rating of ‘A’ or ‘B’ in the cur12 rent recommendations of the United States Pre13 ventive Services Task Force; 

14 ‘‘(L) immunizations that have in effect a 

15 recommendation from the Advisory Committee 

16 on Immunization Practices of the Centers for 

17 Disease Control and Prevention with respect to 

18 the individual involved; 

19 ‘‘(M) with respect to women, such addi20 tional preventive care and screenings not other21 wise described in subparagraph (K) as provided 

22 for in comprehensive guidelines supported by 

23 the Health Resources and Services Administra24 tion; and’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregory Norden, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wyeth (the registrant); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 30, 2009



By:

/s/ Gregory NordenGregory NordenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
10.25






Narrative Summary of
American Consumers, Inc.


Director Compensation
Arrangements





The
following is a description of the current director compensation arrangements for
American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”).  The Board of Directors of
the Company, acting upon the recommendation of the Board’s Compensation
Committee, has elected to leave these arrangements unchanged for the Company’s
fiscal year ending in May 2009 as compared to the Company’s fiscal 2008 and
prior years.





During
fiscal 2009, all Company directors (including both employee and non-employee
directors) will receive cash payments of $300.00 per month for service as
directors, plus reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in attending
meetings of the Board of Directors and any Board committee on which a director
serves.  Directors who are members of the Audit Committee and the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors do not receive any additional
compensation for such committee service.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sylvia Morrison and Rick Morrison, * From the 441st District Court

 of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CV55942.

Vs. No. 11-20-00125-CV * May 12, 2022

Nancy Asamoa, M.D.; John McKenna, * Opinion by Williams, J.

M.D.; Satish Mocherla, M.D.; Hayan (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Orfaly, M.D.; Permian Premier Health Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

Services, Inc.; Asif Ali Khan Ansari, M.D.; 

Rachna Bharti, M.D.; and Texas Tech 

University Health Sciences Center at Odessa,

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we 

reverse the trial court’s order and we render a judgment of dismissal with prejudice 

as to Sylvia Morrison’s and Rick Morrison’s claims against Texas Tech University 

Health Sciences Center at Odessa. We also reverse the trial court’s order insofar 

as it dismissed Sylvia and Rick Morrison’s claims against Nancy Asamoa, M.D.; 

John McKenna, M.D.; Satish Mocherla, M.D.; Hayan Orfaly, M.D.; Permian 

Premier Health Services, Inc.; Asif Ali Khan Ansari, M.D.; and Rachna Bharti, 

M.D., and we remand those claims to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this court’s opinion. The costs incurred by reason of the crossappeal by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at Odessa are taxed

against Sylvia and Rick Morrison, and the remainder of the costs are taxed against 

Appellees Nancy Asamoa, M.D.; John McKenna, M.D.; Satish Mocherla, M.D.; 

Hayan Orfaly, M.D.; Permian Premier Health Services, Inc.; Asif Ali Khan Ansari, 

M.D.; and Rachna Bharti, M.D.
#### J. R. Dowdy, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Dougald McLellan, defendant in error.

(Trippe, Judge, was providentially prevented from presiding in this case.)

1. That a note was given for slaves who were made free by the results of the late war, is no defense to a suit thereon.

2. Where a verdict is contrary to a correct charge of the court, a new trial should be granted on the ground that it is contrary to law. *

*409Promissory notes. Slaves. New trial. Before Judge Steozer. Worth Superior Court. April Term, 1874.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

D. H. Pope, for plaintiff in error.

G. J. Weight; W. A. Harris, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

J. R. Dowdy brought complaint against Dougald McLellan on a promissory note for $1,000 00, dated August 4th, 1860, payable by the 1st of January next thereafter, to James L. Kinchen or bearer, with a credit thereon of $350 00, of date March 12th, 1861. The defendant pleaded the general issue, failure of consideration, payment of $190 00 on the note, and that the plaintiff took it after maturity. The plaintiff introduced the note sued on and closed. The defendant testified substantially as follows: The note was given in part payment for James L. Kinchen’s interest in some negroes belonging to the Holliday estate, to which he was entitled. In 1861, just before the payee traded the note, he paid him $190 00. This amount was in addition to the credit of $350 00 entered thereon. The payee did not part with the note until after its maturity. In 1865 or 1866, Kinchen wrote him that he could not deliver the negroes, and not to pay the note. Mrs. Holliday, under the will, liad the right to keep the negroes until she died. She is still living. Kinchen resided in Tel-fair county. When Mrs. Holliday died the defendant expected to get the negroes himself. He did not expect Kinchen to come from Telfair county to deliver them to him. These negroes were slaves when the note was given, but have become free by the results of the late war. He was aware of the fact that he could not get possession of them until the death of Mrs. Holliday, but expected to get the use of some of them during her life, as the other heirs had done. He never applied to Mrs. Holliday for the use of any of them. *410
      *W.*L. Lane controlled the negroes, and he could not get them. The jury found for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, because the verdict was contrary to law, contrary to the evidence and the following charge of the court: “That if this note was given for negroes, who were slaves at the time it was given, or an interest in them, and they had been freed by the results of the war, that still it was a good consideration." The motion was overruled, and plaintiff excepted.

Assuming that the charge of the court was right, as we think it was, then the verdict was contrary to law, and it was error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

Commission Monthly Case Activity for June 2010 

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 29 

2. Cases Added to Docket 

LandCoast Insulation Inc. 

No. 09-0625 

Direction for Review on 6/14/10 

Stark Excavating, Inc. 

Nos. 09-0004 and 09-0005 

Direction for Review on 6/15/10 

3 

3. Cases Subtracted From Docket 

Compass Environmental, Inc. 

No. 06-1036 

Decision issued on 6/10/10 

ConocoPhillips Bayway Refinery 

No. 07-1045 

Decision issued on 6/15/10 

2 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 30
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129202 Marilyn Kelly 129203 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

TOWNSHIP OF CHESTONIA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129202 

 COA: 250933 
 Antrim CC: 03-007911-CZ 

TOWNSHIP OF STAR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

STEPHEN ORDWAY, et al,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 129203 

 COA: 255509 

Antrim CC: 03-007967-AW 

TOWNSHIP OF STAR, ARLEN TURNER,

MARILYN RYPKOWSKI, KAY RINGLE, 

and CECILE WOODWARD, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S10859]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  Mr. REID. Madam President, I now ask the Senate proceed to a period 
of morning business, with Senators permitted to speak therein for up to 
10 minutes each.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. REID. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HARKIN. I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum 
call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
TROY VAUGHAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

,
Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR R EHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4188

Opinion filed February 20, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.
Troy Vaughan, pro se , Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, A ssistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits

.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ.

, CONCUR.
#### State on relation of THE COMMISSIONERS OF WAKE COUNTY v. ALBERT MAGNIN, and others.

*Bounty Treasurer--Action on Official Bondby County Commissioners' —Sufficiency of Complaint.*

1. An action upon the official bond of a County Treasurer for the recovery of money due the County collected by him. anl not p lid *or*is properly brought in the name of the Board of Commissioners of the County.

*:2.*In such action, where the complaint alleged the execution of the bond and that the defendant collected the money as Treasurer, &c., and there was no allegation that the defendant was Treasurer at auy time not covered by the bond ; field,'that the complaint substantially alleged that the money was collected during the term covered by the bond and was sufficient.

Civil Action tried at Eall Term, 18(77, of Wake Superior •Court, before *McKoy, J.*

This was an action on the bond of the defendant Magnin .as Treasurer of Wake County, iri which the plaintiff alleged the execution of the bond in the penal sum of $52,000 conditioned that the said Magnin during his continuance in •office shall faithfully execute the duties thereof, pay out all moneys which may come into his hands and render a true account of the same when required by law. It was further .alleged that Magnin as Treasurer aforesaid had collected $1111,36 and had failed to pay over the same as required by law.

The defendants demurred to the complaint and assigned as cause, (1) that the Board of Commissioners were not the proper relators to institute this action, and that the County 'Treasurer should have been the relator, and (2) that it is not alleged that the money which was collected by Magnin .as Treasurer of Wake County, and which it was averred that he failed to pay to the relators, was so collected by him *187by virtue of bis appointment to said office for the same term of said office for which the bond declared on was conditioned that said Magnin should faithfully execute &c. His Honor overruled the demurrer and the defendants appealed.

Same counsel as in preceding case.

Reade, J.

The first ground for demurrer, that the County Commissioners are not the proper relators, is *overruled!*for the reason stated in a case between the same parties at this term, *oMe*181.

The second ground for demurrer, that it is not alleged in the complaint that the money was collected during the term covered by the bond, is overruled; for the reason that it is so alleged substantially. It is not alleged that he was County Treasurer at any time not covered by the bond, and it is alleged that he collected the money “ *as Treasurer.”*There is no error. This will be certified to the end that the defendants may answer, if so advised.

No error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Argued November 2,

dismissed November 13, 1973

#### CITY OF MT. ANGEL, *Respondent, v.*VAN CLEVE (No. 79949), *Appellant.*

515 P2d 730

*Clemens E. Ady,*Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Jerry G. Kleen, Salem.

*Robert L. Engle,*Assistant City Attorney, Mt. Angel, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Thornton, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. ORS 221.360; *Tillamook City v. Bogart,*9 Or App 428, 496 P2d 34 (1972).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifiesthat this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|   | November  8, 2010 | /s/  James S. Cox        |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------------|
|   |              | James  S. Cox            |   |
|   |              | Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fiscal fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 19, 2011
    /s/ Christopher H. AtayanChristopher H. Atayan,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	US to Attend 2023 Australian International Airshow and Aerospace and Defence Exposition
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">US to Attend 2023 Australian International Airshow and Aerospace and Defence Exposition</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Feb. 28, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii --<br />The U.S. is honored to participate in the 2023 Australian International Airshow and Aerospace and Defence Exposition at Avalon International Airport, Victoria, Australia, Feb. 28 - March 5, 2023. Approximately 300 U.S. military personnel and four aircraft are attending, and the DoD plans to feature the M142 HIMARS, AH-64 Apache, F-22 Raptor, KC-46 Pegasus and the C-17 Globemaster III among other equipment. The U.S. participates in events like this to demonstrate our focus on regional security and stability in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific.<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 12



QUALITY STORES, INC.
Schedule Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In Thousands, Except Ratio)



                                                 -----------------------------
                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                  April 29,           May 1,
                                                     2000              1999
                                                 ----------         ----------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                $ 10,722           $  5,475
  Portion of rent expense representing interest      1,391                805
                                                  --------           --------
                                                    12,113              6,280
                                                  ========           ========

Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes                 (7,382)             2,422
  Fixed charges                                     12,113              6,280
                                                  --------           --------
                                                  $  4,731           $  8,702
                                                  ========           ========


Ratio (deficiency) of earnings to fixed charges   $ (7,382)             1.4 x
                                                  ========           ========