alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

prevnext

# Joint Task Force-Red Hill Residual Fuel Update

**24-001** |  Feb. 19, 2024    

EMAIL

PRINT

**HONOLULU, Hawaii — **
Joint Task Force-Red Hill (JTF-RH) released an updated dashboard Monday tracking residual fuel removal and key upcoming events. 

As of Feb. 19, JTF-RH safely removed 59,117 gallons of residual fuel from the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (RHBFSF). 

For more information about JTF-RH, visit pacom.mil/jtf-red-hill/ or download the App by searching for “JTF–Red Hill” in the Apple App store or Google Play store.

                                - JTF-RH Public Affairs
                                - Phone: (808) 501-8320  
                                - JTFRH-PAO@us.navy.mil

EMAIL

PRINT
American
Airlines, Inc.
 3219-08   Page
3


3219-08








American
Airlines, Inc.


P.O. Box
619616


Dallas-Fort
Worth Airport


Texas
75261-9616








Subject:                      Open
Configuration Matters








Reference:
            Purchase
      Agreement 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company
      (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer) relating to
      Model 787-923 aircraft (the
Aircraft)








This
Letter Agreement amends the Purchase Agreement. All terms used but not defined
in this Letter Agreement have the same meaning as in the Purchase
Agreement.





1.           Aircraft
Configuration.





1.1           Initial
Configuration.  The initial configuration of Customer's Model
787-923 Aircraft has been defined by Detail Specification 787B1-4102-Rev B,
July 9, 2007 as described in Article 1 and Exhibit A of the Purchase
Agreement (the Aircraft Configuration). [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].





1.2           Final Configuration
Schedule.  [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].





P.A. No.
3219 80111
 Open_Configuration_Matters Rev.:
12/17/03
 BOEING
PROPRIETARY
 
 American
Airlines, Inc.
 3219-08   Page
3


2.           Effect on Purchase
Agreement.





2.1           Basic
Specification.  Changes applicable to the basic Model 787-9
aircraft which are developed by Boeing between the date of signing of the
Purchase Agreement and completion of the final configuration review described in
paragraph 1.2 above will be incorporated into the Aircraft Configuration by
written amendment.





2.2           Exhibit
A.  The effects of all Options, which are mutually agreed upon
between Boeing and Customer for incorporation into the Aircraft Configuration
will be incorporated into Exhibit A of the Purchase Agreement by written
amendment.





2.3           Performance
Guarantees. [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].





2.4           Price
Adjustments.  [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT].


P.A. No.
3219
 Open_Configuration_Matters Rev.:
12/17/03
 BOEING
PROPRIETARY
 
 American
Airlines, Inc.
 3219-08   Page
3





3.           Purchase Agreement
Amendment.





Within [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED
AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]. after reaching agreement as to the final Aircraft Configuration,
Boeing will provide Customer an amendment to the Purchase Agreement reflecting
the effects of the configuration changes agreed to by the parties.





Very
truly yours,





THE
BOEING COMPANY








By





ItsAttorney-In-Fact








ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO this





Date:
,
2008








AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.





By





Its





P.A. No.
3219
 Open_Configuration_Matters Rev.:
12/17/03
 BOEING
PROPRIETARY
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 23, 2015

No. 04-14-00879-CR

Matthew Douglas HAYES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10842W

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 21, 201. On January 21, 

2015, appellant’s attorney filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief. Although the 

clerk of this court can administratively grant a first motion for extension of time for up to thirty 

days, appellant’s attorney requests a sixty-day extension. The motion is GRANTED; however, 

given the length of the extension granted, THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME 

THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by 

March 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6605** 

FREEMAN WRAY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. CECILIA R. REYNOLDS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cv - 02676

- RBH )

Submitted : August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curi am opinion
. Freeman Wray, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Freeman Wray seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition as untimely
. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or jud ge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
ex_206438.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 


 


October 6, 2020


 


 


J. Christopher Hurt


 


 


Re:     Consent to Reduced 2020 Target Bonus Opportunity


 


Reference is made to that certain Employment, Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement that you entered into with Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of March 7, 2016, as amended (the “Agreement”). Section 3(b) of the Agreement provides in part:


 


Should Company meet or exceed the sales, profits and other objectives established by the Compensation Committee for any fiscal year, Employee shall be eligible to receive a bonus for such fiscal year in the amount as determined by the Compensation Committee; provided however, the target bonus opportunity established for Employee in any given fiscal year will be set by the Compensation Committee at not less than fifty percent (50%) of Employee’s earned annual base pay for such fiscal year.


 


In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has requested that you agree to a reduced target bonus opportunity of 30% of your Eligible Quarterly Earnings (as defined in the Fiscal 2020 Performance Objectives For C-Level Employees) for each fiscal quarter of 2020. Consent to this adjustment is requested for fiscal 2020 only.


 


Please sign below to acknowledge and give your consent to this change to your target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


	 	
			Sincerely,


			 


			BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP, INC.


			 


			/s/ Eric Fencl


			 


			Eric Fencl


			Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel


			and Secretary

			



 


 


As described in this letter, I consent to the change to my target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


 


/s/ J. Christopher Hurt                  


J. Christopher Hurt


 


Date:      October 6, 2020
# Official Journal C 233A/28 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 233A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4928 September 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 233A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4928 September 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 233A/1 | Notice to readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 233A/1

Notice to readers

1

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2006/C 233A/2 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/69-70/06 to constitute a reserve of Linguistic Administrators (Conference Interpreters) (AD5 and AD7) with main language English | 3 |

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2006/C 233A/2

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/69-70/06 to constitute a reserve of Linguistic Administrators (Conference Interpreters) (AD5 and AD7) with main language English

EPSO/AD/69-70/06

AD5

AD7

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 466 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-420, K2025-418.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27233 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Appellant, vs. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin, Respondent. [Cab curtain case.]

*Filed March 1, 1927.*

Per Curiam.

Appeal by the *Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company*to review an order of the *Railroad Commission*requiring railroad companies operating in the state of Wisconsin to equip their locomotives with cab curtains as specified in said order.

This is a companion case to *Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Railroad Comm.,*and was argued and decided therewith by *242both courts. Therefore, in accordance with the ruling in *Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Railroad Comm.*47 Sup. Ct. 207:

It is ordered and adjudged that said mandate so filed be entered in this- court, and that pursuant to the command thereof the judgment entered in this court in said action on the 17th day of November, 1925, affirming the judgment of the circuit court for Dane county herein, be and the same is in all things vacated and set aside.

And it is further ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court for Dane county affirming the order of the *Railroad Commission*be and the same is hereby reversed, and that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to said trial court with directions to set aside the order of the *Railroad Commission.*

Stevens, J., took no part.
alv-ex101_168.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Amendment No. 1 to International Assignment Employment Agreement

October 1, 2020

Brad Murray (the “Executive”) and Autoliv, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”), together referred to as the “Parties”, have entered into an International Assignment Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) on January 23, 2020. 

This amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement is made between the Parties.


	
1.
	
Employment and Term





	
1.1
	
Effective November 1, 2020, Mr. Murray’s role as “President, Asia” and as a member of the Executive Management Team will end and his new role shall be “Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company” with such duties, responsibilities, and authority as shall be assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer. 





	
1.2
	
The principal workplace for the Executive shall be the United States of America (“Host Country”). 





	
1.3
	
The Executive shall continue to be deemed a senior executive officer of the Company, a Section 16 officer, PDMR, and Rule 144 Affiliate until his final date of employment. 





	
1.4
	
The Executive’s employment income will continue to be tax equalized to the USA in accordance with the Company’s tax equalization policy. A tax equalization settlement will be made for each calendar year where such employment income is earned or paid. The annual reconciliation will be performed by a third party tax provider appointed by the Company. In the equalization settlement, the tax provider will calculate the Executive’s final hypothetical USA tax and social security liability which would have been due if the Executive would have worked in the USA. This final hypothetical tax liability will be compared with the taxes paid by the Executive during the year (both hypothetical and actual final tax). Assignment specific benefits such as housing and home leave travel are excluded from the equalization reconciliation as the Company covers the tax on such benefits. The Company will pay the associated costs for the equalization reconciliation. The settlement payment from the equalization calculation must be made within 60 days from receiving the calculation. The Company reserves the rights to deduct any amount due to the Company from any other payments due from the Company to the Executive.    





	
2.
	
Other Conditions




All other terms and conditions linked to the Agreement remain unchanged.


	
On behalf of Autoliv, Inc.
	
 
	
The Executive

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Mikael Bratt
	
 
	
Brad Murray

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
President and CEO
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent the use of our reports dated March 10, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (“Oncolytics”) as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Oncolytics as of December 31, 2015, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”).


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-171625 and 333-205708) of our reports dated March 10, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oncolytics as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for each of the years in the three  year  period  ended  December 31,  2015,  and  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  of Oncolytics as of December 31, 2015, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.


Calgary, CanadaMarch 24, 2016Chartered Accountants
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2024

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 26

2. Cases Added to Docket 1

Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc.

23-0938

Direction for Review on February 8, 2024

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket 0

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 27
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v. OSHRC Docket No. 19-1736

SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC.,

Respondent. 

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief the issues presented in Respondent’s petition for 

discretionary review. The parties are advised that when a case is directed for review to consider 

either the merits or characterization of an item, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject 

to review. Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1

 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party not intending to file a brief shall notify the Commission 

in accordance with Commission Rule 93. The time for filing any responsive briefs (or letters filed 

in lieu of briefs) shall commence on the date of service.

 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: October 16, 2023 /s/ 

 John X. Cerveny 

 Executive Secretary

1 The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, regulations, case law, 

law journal articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. 

Parties should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, David Szostak, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PetroAlgae
Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PetroAlgae Inc.



|                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------- |  | 
|/S/    DAVID
SZOSTAK              
|Name: David Szostak               
|Title: Principal Executive Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)     

Dated: May 17,
2010

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.