alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.24


 


 Execution
template


 


 




 


	
        _________________________________________________________

         

        Amendment
        of the

        convertible
        Loan AGREEMENT

        _________________________________________________________

         

        (“Amendment”)

         

        of

         

         

        ___________________

         

        between

         

         

        NLSPharmaCEUTICS
        AG

        as Borrower

         

         

        and

         

         

        [...]

        as Lender

         

         

         

        each a “Party”, together the
        “Parties”



 





 


 


 


Amendment of Convertible Loan Agreement       Confidential 


 



     


     


    

 


WHEREAS the Parties entered
into a convertible loan agreement dated ____________________ (“Convertible Loan Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS Section 4 of the
Convertible Loan Agreement sets forth that the Borrower may at its own and entire discretion repay the loan with accrued
interests, if any, starting December 23 2020 (“Conversion Date Borrower”).


 


WHEREAS the Parties agree in
accordance with Section 10.6 of the Convertible Loan Agreement to amend Section 4 of the Convertible Loan Agreement and to
extend the Conversion Date Borrower for a period of six (6) month until June 23 2021.


 


		1.	Extension of Conversion Date Borrower



 


The Parties hereby agree to extend the
Conversion Date Borrower by six (6) month from December 23 2020 to June 23 2021.


 


		2.	Remaining Provisions



 


Except for the amendments provided herein,
all remaining provisions of the Convertible Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged and binding for the Parties.


This Amendment shall form an integral part
of the Convertible Loan Agreement.


 


		3.	Governing Law and Jurisdiction



 


This Amendment shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the substantive laws of Switzerland, without reference to principles of conflict of laws or choice
of laws.


 


All disputes arising out of or in connection
with the Amendment, including disputes on its conclusion, binding effect, amendment and termination, shall be resolved by the ordinary
courts of Zurich, canton of Zurich, Switzerland, venue being Zurich 1.


 


 


[signature page to follow]


 









    	Amendment Convertible Loan Agreement	Confidential
	-2-



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
acknowledges their understanding and acceptance of the terms of this Agreement and have agreed to sign it on the date first written
above


 


The Borrower


 


NLS Pharmaceutics AG


 


	 	 	 
	Alexander Zwyer	 	Ronald Hafner
	Member of the Board 	 	Chairman of the Board



 


 


The Lender


 


 





 






Name:


 


 


 


	Amendment Convertible Loan Agreement	Confidential	-3-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

h1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

145779

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145779

COA: 304998

Oakland CC: 2011

- 235532

- FC

DAJUAN MARTELL GEORGE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 20, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the July 24,

2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Hardy (Docket No. 144327) and People v Glenn (Docket No. 144979). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 29, 2013, 494 Mich 430 (2013),

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6201

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KERMIT C. BROWN, a/k/a Bear, a/k/a Destruction, a/k/a Brian Mackey, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-98-47; CA-01-774-02) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: July 8, 2004 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kermit C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kermit C. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, in which he sought reconsideration of the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); see Reid v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, 2004 WL 1119646, No. 03-6146 (4th Cir. May 19, 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From Boucher Michael

Sent Thursday November 13 2008 843 PM GMT

To Ross.Philipepamail.epa.gov

Cc Edwards.Dennis@epamail.epa.gov Boucher Michael mbouchermckennalong com

Subject RE Your courier address

Dear Phil

Will do

Sincerely

Michael Boucher

McKENNA LONG ALDRIDGE LLP Attorneys at Law

Michael Boucher

Tel 202 496-7729

Fax 202 496-7756

Cell 202 306-1645

rnboucher@rnckennalong corn

1900 Street NW Suite 100

Washington D.C 20006-1102

United States of Arnerica

Tel 202 496-7500

http //www.rnckennalong corn

ALBANY ATLANTA BRUSSELS DENVER LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA SAN DIEGO

SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON D.C

Original Message

Frorn Ross.Philip@eparnail.epa.gov Ross.Philip@eparnail.epa gov

Sent Thursday Novernber 13 2008 339 PM

To Boucher Michael

Cc Edwards.Denniseparnail.epa.gov

Subject Re Your courier address

Please send rny copy in the package you send to Dennis Edwards and also please send rne pdf copy atross.philip@epa.gov

Thanks

Philip Ross

United States Environrnental Protection Agency Office of General Counsel Pesticides and Toxic Substances Law Office

202-564-5637
Boucher

Michael

mboucher@mckenn To

along.com Philip Ross/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

11/13/2008 0247

PM Subject

Your courier address

Would you kindly send it to me Thank you

McKENNA LONG ALDRIDGE LLP

Attorneys at Law

Michael Boucher 1900 Street NW Suite 100

Tel 202 496-7729 Washington D.C 20006-1102

Fax 202 496-7756 United States of America

Cell 202 306-1645 Tel 202 496-7500

mbouchermckennalong com http//www.mckennalong.com

ALBANY ATLANTA

BRUSSELS DENVER LOS

ANGELES NEW YORK

PHILADELPHIA SAN DIEGO

SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTONJ

D.C

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of McKenna Long Aldridge LLP and are intended solely

for the use of the named recipient or recipients This e-mail may contain privileged attorney/client communications or work product

Any dissemination of this e-mail by anyone other than an intended recipient is strictly prohibited If you are not named recipient you

are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments If you

believe you have received this e-mail in error notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail any attachments and

all copies thereof from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts of the e-mail or attachments
**Exhibit 31(c)2**

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Cliff S. Thrasher, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Georgia Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 27, 2006

                  /s/Cliff S. Thrasher                  

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westell Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
     as of and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ E. Van Cullens
-----------------------------
E. Van Cullens
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003

/s/ Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.
-----------------------------
Nicholas C. Hindman, Sr.
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003
#### HARRY SKINNER and others v. THEOPHILUS BLAND.

*Judge of Superior Coun.*

A judge of the superior court has no power to entertain a motion in a cause, which by appeal is in the supreme court.

*(Isler*v. Brown, 69 N. C., 125, cited and approved.)

Motion to set aside a judgment, heard at Spring Term, 1882, of Pitt Superior Court, before *Gilmer, J.*

This is another motion made in the cause of *Sheppard*v. *Bland,*the preceding case, and to which reference is made for the better understanding of the facts of this case.

After the motion of the defendant, Bland, to set aside the execution, under which bis land had been sold and purchased by Skinner, had been heard at fall term, 1881, of the superior court of Pitt county, and refused by the court, and after the said Bland had taken an appeal and caused the same to be docketed in this court, he served notice on Skinner and the officers of the court, that at spring term, 1882, he should move the court to set aside the order refusing his motion to vacate the execution, and to grant him a new trial.

Accordingly at spring term, 1882, he made such motion before *Judge Gilmer,*and supported the same by his affidavit setting forth that after the trial had at fall term, 1881, the same being before *Judge Shipp,*the plaintiffs had been allowed to introduce evidence which was considered by the court after the trial in the court house had closed, and while the judge had the cause under consideration, of which the defendant and his counsel had no notice, and while in fact he and one of his attorneys were absent and another one sick — thus taking him by surprise.

To this the plaintiffs replied by counter-affidavits, denying that any such evidence had been received after the trial *169was closed, alleging on the contrary, that the evidence was all taken openly in the court house, and when the cause was regularly called for trial, and when, if the defendant or his attorneys were absent, it was their own fault.

His Honer Judge Gilmer refused to entertain the defendant’s motion upon the ground that the cause by appeal was in the supreme court, and He had therefore no power to hear the motion or grant a new trial, and accordingly dismissed the defendant’s motion, and he appealed.

No counsel for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Strong & Smedes,*for defendant.

Ruffin, J.

His Honor’s ruling is in itself manifestly correct, and is. fully, supported by the authority of *Isler*v. *Brown,*69 N. C., 125, and for the very reasons assigned by him. There is no error.

No error. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|           |                                                                   |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 9, 2005 | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                                    |
|           | Graham V. Smith                                                        |
|           | Executive Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

English Summary of a lease agreement dated May 4, 2020 (the “Lease”) by and between Galecto Biotech ApS (“Galecto”) and COBIS A/S (the
“Landlord”) 
  

	•	 	 Leased Property: the Lease is for the purpose of office space, with its address: Ole Maaloes Vej 3,
DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.


  

	•	 	 Term: The term started at June 1, 2020 and will end on October 31, 2021



  

	•	 	 Deposit: Galecto must provide a deposit equivalent to four months’ rent, excluding VAT for securing
its obligations. 


  

	•	 	 Permitted Use: The permitted use is for laboratory and office space 



 

	•	 	 Sublease: Galecto is allowed to sublease the property contingent on a new tenant working within the same
industry. 


  

	•	 	 Rent: DKK 73,300, including VAT, based on the rental area of 1,300 square feet.



  

	•	 	 Modifications to leased Premises: Galecto is permitted to effect modifications to the leased premises only
with the prior written approval of the Landlord. Galecto and the Landlord will agree on the costs, reimbursement and potential obligations to build-back modifications.
EDGAR HTML



      

      

         


      



      Exhibit 4.3
      


      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
      


      We have issued our report dated October 20, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 493 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-239866) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”. 


      


      
         	

                  


               	

                  /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S597]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 REPORT ON THE CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO CUBA 
   AND OF THE EMERGENCY AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE 
                ANCHORAGE AND MOVEMENT OF VESSELS--PM 5

  The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message 
from the President of the United States, together with an accompanying 
report; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs:

To the Congress of the United States:
  Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) 
provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, 
prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President 
publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a 
notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the 
anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent the 
enclosed notice to the Federal Register for publication, stating that 
the national emergency declared with respect to the Government of 
Cuba's destruction of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in 
international airspace north of Cuba on February 24, 1996, as amended 
and expanded on February 26, 2004, is to continue in effect beyond 
March 1, 2009.
                                                      George W. Bush.  
The White House, January 15, 2009.
                                  ____
                                  

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of Form S-8 (File Nos. 033-05913, 33-53381, 33-27372, 333-40715, 333-55588, 333-113039, 333-113040, 333-129010, and 333-143743) of Analogic Corporation of our report dated September 27, 2007
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP          
|Boston, Massachusetts September 27, 2007
EX-10.2.1





 Exhibit 10.2.1 

BIODESIX, INC. 

STOCK OPTION GRANT NOTICE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2006 EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND
CONSULTANT STOCK PLAN 
 Biodesix, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to its Amended
and Restated 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan (the “Plan”), hereby grants to Optionholder an option to purchase the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock set forth below. This option is
subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth herein and in the Option Agreement, the Plan, and the Notice of Exercise, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein in their entirety. 

 

			
	Optionholder:	 	  

	Date of Grant:	 	  

	Vesting Commencement Date:	 	  

	Number of Shares Subject to Option:	 	  

	Exercise Price (Per Share):	 	  

	Total Exercise Price:	 	  

	Expiration Date:	 	  


  

							
	Type of Grant:	 	☐	 	Incentive Stock Option1	 	 ☐  Nonstatutory Stock Option

				
	Exercise Schedule:	 	☐	 	Same as Vesting Schedule	 	 ☐  Early Exercise Permitted

		
	Vesting Schedule:	 	2/5th of the shares vest two years after the Vesting Commencement Date; the balance of the shares vest in a series of
thirty-six (36) successive equal monthly installments measured from the second anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date.
		
	Payment:	 	By one or a combination of the following methods of payment (described in the Option Agreement): (i) Cash,
	check, bank draft or money order payable to the Company; (ii) Pursuant to a Regulation T Program (cashless exercise) if the shares are publicly traded; or (iii) one or more of the following methods IF the box
opposite such method is checked by the Company:
			
		 	☐	 	Delivery of already-owned shares if the shares are publicly traded
		 	☐	 	Net exercise2
		 	☐	 	Deferred Payment

 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements: The undersigned Optionholder acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to,
this Stock Option Grant Notice, the Option Agreement and the Plan. Optionholder further acknowledges that as of the Date of Grant, this Stock Option Grant Notice, the Option Agreement, and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between
Optionholder and the Company regarding the acquisition of stock in the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception of (i) options previously granted and delivered to Optionholder under the
Plan, and (ii) the following agreements only: 
  

			
	OTHER AGREEMENTS:	  	  

		  	  


  

									
	BIODESIX, INC.	 		 	OPTIONHOLDER:
				
	By:	 	  
	 		 	  

		 	Signature	 		 		 	Signature
					
	Title:	 	  
	 		 	Date:	 	  

					
	Date:	 	  
	 		 		 	

 ATTACHMENTS: Option Agreement, Amended and Restated 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant
Stock Plan and Notice of 
 Exercise 
  

	1 	 If this is an Incentive Stock Option, it (plus other outstanding Incentive Stock Options) cannot be first
exercisable for more than $100,000 in value (measured by exercise price) in any calendar year. Any excess over $100,000 is a Nonstatutory Stock Option. 



	2 	 An Incentive Stock Option may not be exercised by a net exercise arrangement.