alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 18, 2022

NO. 03-22-00227-CR

Steven Duane Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Steven Duane 

Williams has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, 

allows Williams to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because Williams is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 114 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to search all public records 

to determine if an alien is inadmissible to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. BUCHANAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to search 

all public records to determine if an alien is inadmissible 

to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Media Screening 

5 for Terrorists Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO SEARCH RECORDS OF ALIENS 

7 APPLYING FOR ADMISSION TO THE UNITED 

8 STATES. 

9 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall search all 

10 public records, including Internet sites and social media 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 114 IH

1 profiles, to determine if an alien applying for admission 

2 to the United States is inadmissible under section 212 of 

3 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1207 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 306 River Street in Tilden, Texas, as the 

‘‘Tilden Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1207 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST TILDEN VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 306 River Street in Tilden, 

4 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tilden Vet5 erans Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tilden Veterans Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 48 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 48

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on any legislative day from Thursday, 
April 6, 2017, through Friday, April 21, 2017, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 25, 2017, 
or until the time of any reassembly

              

 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the House 
to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his 
opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
    (b) After reassembling pursuant to subsection (a), when the House 
adjourns on a motion offered pursuant to this subsection by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, the House shall again stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this concurrent resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 48

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

        Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 
                            Representatives.
```
#### In the Matter of Sharon L. McQUINN, Debtor. Sharon L. McQUINN, Plaintiff, v. DIAL FINANCE CO., and First National Bank of Omaha, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. BK80-611.

No. A80-249.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska.

Nov. 10, 1980.

*900Ted N. Sleder, Omaha, Neb., for debt- or/plaintiff.

Dennis J. Green, Omaha, Neb., for defendant, First Nat. Bank of Omaha.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID L. CRAWFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtor wishes to redeem a 1968 mobile home. The sole issue in this proceeding is the value of the home. The expert witnesses were in substantial agreement as to the retail value, which I find to be $2,800.00. However, the Bankruptcy Code does not necessarily contemplate that debtors should pay retail value in order to redeem property.

Section 722 of the Bankruptcy Code permits debtors to redeem by paying lienhold-ers the amount of the allowed secured claim. Section 506(a) of the Code states that the value of an allowed secured claim “shall be determined in light of the purpose of the valuation and of the proposed disposition or use ...” of the collateral. In this case, the purpose of the valuation is to give the debtor the first right to purchase property which would otherwise simply be repossessed and sold to someone else. H.R. Rep.No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 380-81 (1977), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1978, pp. 5787, 6336.

I find that the debtor should pay the replacement value which the collateral has for her. *Ford Motor Credit v. Miller,*4 B.R. 392, 6 Bkrtcy.Ct.Dec. 410 (S.D. Cal. 1980). However, the retail value of the collateral includes costs such as dealer overhead, salesman’s • commissions, and profit which the debtor should not be required to pay in this type of transaction. I find that those costs total $1,000.00. Therefore, the debtor should be permitted to redeem for $1,800.00. See *Ford Motor Credit v. Miller, supra.*
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET Docket DOT-OST-2011.0076
Application of ALLEGIANT AIR, LLC For exemption authority pursuant to 49 USC § 40109 Docket DOT-OST-2013-0128 Las Vegas - Hermosillo, Mexico Las Vegas - Los Cabos/San Jose del Cabo, Mexico

NOTICE OF DORMANCY


### Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

July 28, 2014 Aaron A. Goerlich Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC 1200 New Hampshire Ave NW Washington DC 20036- 6802 Tel 

### (202) 776-3970 Fax 

### (202) 776-3975 agoerlich@ggh-airlaw .com Counsel forAllegiantAir , LLCBEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET Docket DOT-OST-2011-0076
Application of ALLEGIANT AIR, LLC For exemption authority pursuant to 49 USC § 40109 Docket DOT-OST-2013-0128 Las Vegas - Hermosillo, Mexico Las Vegas - Los Cabos/San Jose del Cabo, Mexico
NOTICE OF DORMANCY 

### Allegiant Air has decided not to initiate scheduled service between Las Vegas, Nevada, on one hand, and Hermosillo and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, on the other hand, for the foreseeable future. This service was authorized by Notice of Action Taken dated July 22, 2013 (Docket DOT-OST-2013-0128). Expiration of the dormancy period for the routes is August 29, 2014. Respectfully submitted,

Aaron A. 

### Goerlich GAROFALO GO ERLICH HAINBACH PC Counsel for Allegiant Air, LLC 

### July 28, 2014Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on July 28, 2014, a copy of the foregoing notice of Allegiant Air was served by email upon each ofthe persons listed below.

Robert Kneisley (AirTran, Southwest) Marshall Sinick (Alaska) Robert Wirick (American, American Eagle) Robert Cohn (ASA, Frontier) Eileen Gleimer (ExpressJet) Jonathan Hill (JetBiue) Alexander Van der Sellen (Delta) Joanne Young (Spirit) John Fredericksen (Sun Country) Dan Weiss (United) Steve Morrissey (United) Howard Kass (US Airways) Barbara Russell (Virgin America) Chris Pappaioanou (Mesa) Gerry Murphy (Skywest) Brian Hedberg (DOT) Esta Rosenberg (DOT) Brett Kruger (DOT) Michael Koester bob.kneisley@wnco .com marshall .sinick@squiresanders.com robert .wirick@aa .com robert .cohn@hoganlovells .com egleimer@crowell.com jhill@cooley.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jyoung@yklaw.com john.fredericksen@suncountry.com dan.weiss@united .com steve.morrissey@united.com howard_kass@usairways.com barbara . russell@vi rginamerica.com chris.pappaioanou@mesa -air.com gmurphy@crowell.com brian.hedberg@dot .gov esta.rosenberg@dot .gov brett.kruger@dot.gov
#### Krolikowski and another, Respondents, vs. Mutual Building and Savings Association, Appellant.

*February 5*

March *4, 1930.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Schmitz, Wild & Gross*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Edwin J. Gross.*

*174For the respondents there was a brief by *Kleczka & Kleczka*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *John C. Kleczka.*

Stevens, J.

The defendant association adopted, a by-law which provided: “Members may repay their loans at any time, in full or in amounts of $100, by giving thirty days’ notice to the secretary and upon paying the withdrawal fee of $1 per share, together with one month’s additional interest on amount repaid.”

The question presented is the validity of this provision requiring one month’s additional interest to be paid. In order to determine that question we must examine the powers conferred upon such associations by statute. Sec. 215.07 confers power “to make loans to members . . . upon such terms and conditions as may be provided in the by-laws.” Under sec. 215.26 the articles of the association and by-laws must specify “the terms and conditions upon which loans may be obtained, paid and canceled,” but such by-laws shall not be “inconsistent with law.”

Sec. 215.18 provides that “A borrower may repay his loan at any time by giving thirty days’ written notice of his intention. He shall be charged with the amount of the original loan and interest, premium and fines in arrears, and be given credit for the withdrawal value of his shares pledged as security. The balance shall be received in full satisfaction of said loan.” By providing that the borrower shall be charged with the amount of the loan and *interest in arrears*and that, after being credited with the withdrawal value of his shares pledged to secure the loan, *“the balance shall be received in full satisfaction of said loan,”*the legislature has evidenced an intent to limit the interest that must be paid to the amount that is due at the time the loan was repaid.

*175The defendant association therefore had no power to adopt the by-law which required interest to be paid for one month after the principal of the loan has 'actually been paid.

By requiring the borrower to give thirty days’ notice of his desire to repay the loan, the statute has given the association time in which to make a new loan and thus keep its funds invested where they will be earning a return.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.

Feitz, J., took no part.
No. 90-6180.

#### In re Hertel et al.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<LEGEND>
                                          FDS - 4TH QUARTER
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0000006207
<NAME>                                    AMREP CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                             12,934
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      54,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        70,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                             31,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                     14,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    172,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                            31,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              740
<OTHER-SE>                                         91,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      172,436
<SALES>                                            62,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  119,833
<CGS>                                              49,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     102,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                          779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 1,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,169
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .16



</TABLE>
#### Klar Piquett Mining Company, Appellant, vs. Town of Platteville, Respondent.

*April 12*

May *2, 1916.*

*Klar Piquett M. Co. v. Platteville, post,*p. 215, followed.

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Grant county: Georue OlemeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. W.*Murphyfor the appellant.

For tbe respondent there was a brief by *Kopp & Brunclc-horst,*and oral argument by *A. W. Kopp.*

ViNJE, J.

This is an action to recover an alleged excess of income tax paid for tbe year 1911. Except as to dates and amounts it is identical with tbe case following and is ruled by it.

*By the Oourt.*— Order affirmed.
May-10 Jul-11 Mar-12

Revised Revised Revised 

Budgeted Budgeted Actual Budgeted Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual Bu

09-10 09-10 09-10 10-11 10-11 10-11 11-12 11-12 1

TOTAL PROG COST 9,983,350 9,983,350 8,252,716 9,172,132 8,943,046 8,466,373 9,327,735 8,676,137 8Other Non-Recurrent 2,498,991 2,498,991 1,687,828 2,293,170 2,293,170 1,832,097 2,610,943 1,850,044 2EPA FUNDING 505,880 508,430 508,430 737,516 508,430 508,430 546,883 508,430 PROGRAM COST 6,978,479 6,975,929 6,056,458 6,141,446 6,141,446 6,125,846 6,169,909 6,317,663 5$'s Over / (Under) MOE Goal 536,366 533,816 73,240 84,988 84,988 69,388 44,063 191,818 

(

FY13 Actual - FY12 Actual (304,157)

SBCAPCD EPA MOE FY 08/09 - 12/13
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 5 (Sunday, January 11, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S272]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         ADDITIONAL COSPONSORS

                                 S. 197

  At the request of Mr. Feingold, the name of the Senator from Florida 
(Mr. Martinez) was added as a cosponsor of S. 197, a bill to assist in 
the conservation of cranes by supporting and providing, through 
projects of persons and organizations with expertise in crane 
conservation, financial resources for the conservation programs of 
countries the activities of which directly or indirectly affect cranes 
and the ecosystem of cranes.

                          ____________________
```
No. 90-683.

#### Georgia Marble Co. *v.*Whitlock et ux.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Philip K. Woodlief, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Doane PetCare Company, hereby certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Doane Pet CareCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004                                               /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEF   Philip K. Woodlief   Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDoane Pet Care Company
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S353]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, following leader remarks, the Senate will 
resume consideration of the wilderness bill, S. 22, with the time until 
10:30 a.m. equally divided between the leaders or their designees. The 
Democratic time is given to Senator Bingaman of New Mexico. At 10:30 
a.m., the Senate will proceed to a rollcall vote on the motion to 
invoke cloture on S. 22. The filing deadline for second-degree 
amendments is 10 a.m. this morning.

                          ____________________
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army Conducts 1st RIMPAC Joint Live-fire Sinking Exercise as Multi-Domain Task Force

By Capt. Rachael Jeffcoat

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News