AAMA 2604-05 

Voluntary Specification,

Performance Requirements

and Test Procedures for 

High Performance Organic

Coatings on Aluminum

Extrusions and Panels

MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface...................................................................................1

Superceed...............................................................................1

1.0 Scope ...............................................................................1

2.0 Purpose ............................................................................1

3.0 Definitions ........................................................................1

4.0 General.............................................................................1

5.0 Test Specimens ..................................................................2

6.0 Metal Preparation And Pre-treatment.....................................2

7.0 Tests ................................................................................2

8.0 Test Reports ......................................................................6

9.0 Referenced Standards..........................................................7

AAMA. The Source of Performance Standards, Product Certification and

Educational Programs for the Fenestration Industry.

This voluntary specification was developed by representative members of AAMA

as advisory information and published as a public service. AAMA disclaims all

liability for the use, application or adaptation of materials published herein.

©2005

American Architectural Manufacturers Association

1827 Walden Office Square, Suite 550, Schaumburg, IL 60173

PHONE (847)303-5664 FAX (847)303-5774

EMAIL webmaster@aamanet.org WEBSITE www.aamanet.org

All AAMA documents may be ordered at our web site in the “Publications Store”.

Originally Published: 1998

Preceeding Document: 2604-02

Revised And Published: 7/2005

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 1 

PREFACE 

For years, the architectural community has recognized 

AAMA 603 and AAMA 605 as the standards for testing 

and performance of organic coatings on architectural 

aluminum extrusions and panels. Significant advances 

have been made in technology which have created the need 

to revise these specifications. 

AAMA 2603, "Voluntary Specification, Performance 

Requirements and Test Procedures for Pigmented Organic 

Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels;" 

AAMA 2604, "Voluntary Specification, Performance 

Requirements and Test Procedures for High Performance 

Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels;" 

AAMA 2605, "Voluntary Specification, Performance 

Requirements and Test Procedures for Superior Performing 

Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels." 

SUPERCEED 

AAMA 603, "Voluntary Performance Requirements and 

Test Procedures for Pigmented Organic Coatings on 

Extruded Aluminum;" and 

AAMA 605, "Voluntary Specification for High 

Performance Organic Coatings on Architectural 

Extrusions and Panels;" as well as all revisions to these 

documents. 

AAMA 2604 is a new five-year high performance 

specification similar in performance criteria to the 

original version of AAMA 605.2-92 (the original version 

does not include any subsequent Addenda) with the 

exception of the pre-treatment section, which allows for 

non-chrome pre-treatment. 

1.0 SCOPE 

1.1 This specification describes test procedures and 

performance requirements for high performance organic 

coatings applied to aluminum extrusions and panels for 

architectural products. 

1.2 This specification covers factory-applied spray 

coatings only. 

1.3 The primary units of measure in this document are 

metric. The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as 

the standard. The values given in parentheses are for 

reference only. 

2.0 PURPOSE 

The specification will assist the architect, owner and 

contractor to specify and obtain factory-applied organic 

coatings which will provide and maintain a high level of 

performance in terms of film integrity, exterior 

weatherability and general appearance over a period of 

many years. 

3.0 DEFINITIONS 

3.1 The terms "film" and "coating" are used 

interchangeably in this specification and are defined as 

meaning the layer of organic material applied to the 

surface of the aluminum. 

3.2 Exposed surfaces are those surfaces which are visible 

when the coated product is installed. These may include 

both closed and open positions of operating sash, 

ventilators, doors or panels. 

3.3 Spray Coating: The process of applying a resinous 

coating by atomizing it into a spray or mist, and curing it 

into a continuous film. 

4.0 GENERAL 

4.1 To qualify as meeting this specification, products 

tested shall meet all requirements as specified herein. 

4.2 Coatings shall be visibly free from flow lines, streaks, 

blisters or other surface imperfections in the dry-film state 

on exposed surfaces when observed at a distance of 3 m 

(10 ft) from the metal surface and inspected at an angle of 

90 degrees to the surface. 

4.3 The total dry-film thickness shall be assessed utilizing 

the ASTM D 1400 method. Eighty percent of 

measurements on primary exposed surfaces shall meet or 

exceed 30 microns (1.2 mil) total film thickness. Paint 

process capability may result in readings below 25 

microns (1.0 mil). No more than 5% of the total readings, 

on primary exposed surfaces, shall be below 25 microns 

(1.0 mil) (or, 85% of film thickness specified), assuming 

appropriate color and hide. Film thickness specified may 

be increased to be consistent with color selection and type 

of coating as recommended by the coating manufacturer. 

NOTE: Due to the complexities of extrusion dies and 

limitations of application equipment, it may not be 

possible to achieve minimum recommended dry film 

thickness on all areas of an extrusion, such as inside 

corners and channels. For details of these affected areas, 

contact the coating applicator prior to painting. 

4.4 Cleaning and metal preparation shall be to ensure 

compliance with the performance requirements. 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 2 

4.5 Minor scratches and blemishes shall be repairable 

with the coating manufacturer's recommended product or 

system. Such repairs shall match the original finish for 

color and gloss and shall adhere to the original finish 

when tested as outlined in Section 7.4.1.1, Dry Adhesion. 

After application, allow the repair coating to dry for at 

least 72 hours at 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F) before 

conducting the film adhesion test. 

NOTE: The size and number of touch-up repairs should 

be kept to a minimum. 

4.6 Sealant used in contact with an organic coating shall 

be compatible with the organic coating and meet the 

performance requirements of AAMA 800 sealant 

specification. There shall be no evidence of deleterious 

effects in the organic coating such as staining, coating 

separation, lifting, discoloration or loss of adhesion of the 

coating from the substrate. 

NOTE: It is strongly recommended that the fabricator of 

the finished products consult with the sealant 

manufacturer in the selection of the appropriate sealant. 

Pell adhesion testing as described in AAMA 800 is 

suggested. It is important to understand that the AAMA 

800 sealant specification does not ensure adhesion to a 

specific coating. The best way to ensure adhesion is to 

submit panel specimens of the specific coating to the 

sealant manufacturer or an AAMA accredited 

independent laboratory for tests and recommendations. 

5.0 TEST SPECIMENS 

5.1 Test specimens shall consist of finished panels or 

extrusions representative of the production coated 

aluminum. A sufficient number of specimens on which to 

conduct instrument measurements with flat coated 

surfaces of at least 150 mm (6 in) long and 75 mm (3 in) 

wide, shall be submitted to the testing laboratory. The 

coating applicator or fabricator shall indicate exposed 

surfaces or submit drawings. Tests shall be performed on 

exposed areas as indicated on drawings or as marked on 

test specimens. 

6.0 METAL PREPARATION AND PRETREATMENT 

NOTE: A multi-stage cleaning and pre-treatment system 

is required to remove organic and inorganic surface soils, 

remove residual oxides, and apply a chemical conversion 

coating to which organic coatings will firmly adhere. 

6.1 The pre-treatment when used in conjunction with a 

baked organic coating shall produce a total finishing system 

capable of meeting impact, adhesion, detergent, humidity 

and salt spray performance as specified in the appropriate 

test method. 

6.2 CHEMICAL CONVERSION COATING WEIGHT 

6.2.1 Procedure 

Measure in accordance with the latest issue of ASTM D 

5723, using x-ray fluorescence or other standard methods 

for determining coating weights. 

6.2.2 Performance 

Chrome containing conversion coating weights should be a 

minimum of 323 mg/m2

 (30 mg/ft2). 

Non-chrome conversion coating weights should be 

maintained according to supplier’s recommendations. 

NOTE: Frequent in-plant testing and control of pretreatment is required to insure satisfactory performance of 

the coating system. 

7.0 TESTS 

7.1 COLOR UNIFORMITY 

7.1.1 Procedure 

Check random samples visually under a uniform light 

source. Viewing should be done at multiple angles. In 

conjunction, instrumental methods are imperative. 

7.1.2 Performance 

Color uniformity shall be consistent with the color range or 

numerical value established between the approval source 

and the applicator. Suggested range is 2∆E per ASTM D 

2244, Section 6.3, from agreed upon color standard. 

NOTE: Color and finish appearance may vary upon 

factory application due to differences in spray equipment, 

line conditions or day-to-day process variations. It is 

strongly recommended that final color approval be made 

with actual production line samples or mock-ups, not 

laboratory prepared panels. 

Pearlescent mica and metallic flakes reflect and scatter 

light in random patterns; therefore, exact color uniformity 

should not be expected. Slight color shifting should also be 

expected when viewing from varying angles and distances. 

Equipment considerations affect color and are especially 

critical with multiple applicators. 

7.2 SPECULAR GLOSS 

7.2.1 Procedure 

Measure in accordance with the latest issue of ASTM D 

523 using a 60 degree gloss meter. Samples must meet 

minimum dry film thickness requirements. 

7.2.2 Performance 

Gloss values shall be within ± 5 units of the manufacturer's 

specification. 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 3 

NOTE: Standard gloss range reference values are: 

Gloss Colors Specular Gloss Value 

High 

Medium 

Low 

80-Over 

20-79 

19 or less 

7.3 DRY FILM HARDNESS 

7.3.1 Procedure 

Strip the wood from a Berol Eagle Turquoise pencil or 

equivalent, grade F minimum hardness, leaving a full 

diameter of lead exposed to a length of 6 mm minimum to 

10 mm maximum (1/4 in minimum to 3/8 in maximum). 

Flatten the end of the lead 90 degrees to the pencil axis 

using fine-grit sand or emery paper. Hold the pencil at a 45 

degree angle to the film surface and push forward about 6 

mm (1/4 in) using as much downward pressure as can be 

applied without breaking the lead. Reference ASTM D 

3363. 

7.3.2 Performance 

No rupture of film per ASTM D 3363. 

7.4 FILM ADHESION 

7.4.1 Procedure 

7.4.1.1 Dry Adhesion 

Make 11 parallel cuts, 1 mm (1/16 in) apart through the 

film. Make 11 similar cuts at 90 degrees to and crossing the 

first 11 cuts. Apply tape (Permacel 99 or equivalent) 20 

mm (3/4 in) wide over area of cuts by pressing down firmly 

against the coating to eliminate voids and air pockets. 

Sharply pull the tape off at a right angle to the plane of the 

surface being tested. Test pieces should be at ambient 

temperature [approximately 18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F)]. 

7.4.1.2 Wet Adhesion 

Make cuts as outlined in Section 7.4.1.1. Immerse the 

sample in distilled or deionized water at 38°C (100°F) for 

24 hours. Remove and wipe the sample dry. Repeat the 

test specified in Section 7.4.1.1 within five minutes. 

7.4.1.3 Boiling Water Adhesion 

Make cuts as outlined in Section 7.4.1.1. Immerse the 

sample in boiling distilled or deionized water 99°C to 

100°C (210°F to 212°F) for 20 minutes. The water shall 

remain boiling throughout the test. Remove the sample 

and wipe it dry. Repeat the test specified in Section 

7.4.1.1 within five minutes. 

7.4.2 Performance 

No removal of film under the tape within or outside of the 

crosshatched area or blistering anywhere on the test 

specimen. Report loss of adhesion as a percentage of 

squares affected, (i.e., 10 squares lifted is 10% failure). 

7.5 IMPACT RESISTANCE 

7.5.1 Procedure 

Using a 16 mm (5/8 in) diameter round-nosed impact 

tester 18 N-m (160 in-lb) range, such as a Gardner impact 

tester, apply a load directly to the coated surface of 

sufficient force to deform the test sample a minimum of 3 

mm ± 0.3 mm (0.10 in ± 0.01 in). Apply tape (Permacel 

99 or equivalent) 20 mm (3/4 in) wide over area of 

deformation by pressing down firmly against coating to 

eliminate voids and air pockets. Sharply pull tape off at a 

right angle to the plane of the surface being tested. Test 

pieces should be at ambient temperature approximately 

18°C to 27°C (65°F to 80°F). 

7.5.2 Performance 

No removal of film from substrate. 

NOTE: Minute cracking at the perimeter of the concave 

area of the test panel is permissible but no coating pickoff should be apparent. 

7.6 ABRASION RESISTANCE 

7.6.1 Procedure 

Using the falling sand test method, ASTM D 968, the 

Abrasion Coefficient shall be calculated according to the 

formula which follows. 

ABRASION COEFFICIENT - LITERS PER MIL = V/T 

where: V = volume of sand used in liters 

 T = thickness of coating in mils 

7.6.2 Performance 

The Abrasion Coefficient Value of the coating shall be 20 

minimum. 

7.7 CHEMICAL RESISTANCE 

7.7.1 Muriatic Acid Resistance 

(15-Minute Spot Test) 

7.7.1.1 Procedure 

Apply 10 drops of 10% (by volume) solution of muriatic 

acid (37% commercial grade hydrochloric acid) in tap 

water and cover it with a watch glass, convex side up. The 

acid solution and test shall be conducted at 18°C to 27°C 

(65°F to 80°F). After a 15 minute exposure, wash off with 

running tap water. 

7.7.1.2 Performance 

No blistering and no visual change in appearance when 

examined by the unaided eye. 

7.7.2 Mortar Resistance 

(24-Hour Pat Test) 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 4 

7.7.2.1 Procedure 

Prepare mortar by mixing 75 g (2.6 oz) of building lime 

(conforming to ASTM C 207) and 225 g (7.9 oz) of dry 

sand, both passing through a 10-mesh wire screen with 

sufficient water, approximately 100 g (3.5 oz), to make a 

soft paste. Immediately apply wet pats of mortar about 

1300 mm2 (2 in2) in area and 12 mm (1/2 in) in thickness 

to coated aluminum specimens, which have been aged at 

least 24 hours after coating. Immediately expose test 

sections for 24 hours to 100% relative humidity at 38°C 

(100°F). 

7.7.2.2 Performance 

Mortar shall dislodge easily from the painted surface, and 

any residue shall be removable with a damp cloth. Any 

lime residue should be easily removed with the 10% 

muriatic acid solution described in Section 7.7.1.1. There 

shall be no loss of film adhesion or visual change in 

appearance when examined by the unaided eye. 

NOTE: A slight staining or discoloration may be 

apparent on orange, yellow or metallic coatings. This 

should be discussed with the specifying source prior to 

selection of color. 

7.7.3 Nitric Acid Resistance 

7.7.3.1 Procedure 

Fill an eight-ounce wide-mouth bottle one-half full of nitric 

acid, 70% ACS reagent grade(1). Place the test panel 

completely over the mouth of the bottle painted side down, 

for 30 minutes. Rinse the sample with tap water, wipe it 

dry, and measure any color change after a one-hour 

recovery period. 

(1)The assay of the nitric acid (HNO3) should be Fisher A200 or equivalent; minimum 69.0%, maximum 71.0%. 

7.7.3.2 Performance 

Not more than 5∆E Units (Hunter) of color change, 

calculated in accordance with ASTM D 2244, when 

comparing measurements on the acid-exposed painted 

surface and the unexposed surface. 

7.7.4 Detergent Resistance 

7.7.4.1 Procedure 

Prepare a 3% (by weight) solution of detergent as 

prescribed in ASTM D 2248, and distilled water. Immerse 

at least two test specimens in the detergent solution at 38°C 

(100°F) for 72 hours. Remove and wipe the samples dry. 

Immediately apply tape (Permacel 99 or equivalent) 20 mm 

(3/4 in) wide by pressing down firmly against the coating to 

eliminate voids and air pockets. Place the tape 

longitudinally along the entire length of the test specimens. 

If blisters are visible, then the blistered area must be taped 

and rated. Sharply pull off at a right angle to the plane of 

the surface being tested, per ASTM D 3359. A typical 

solid detergent composition is as follows: 

Parts by 

Weight 

Tetrasodium pyrophosphate (Na4P2O7) 

anhydrous 53.0 

Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), anhydrous 19.0 

Sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3), anhydrous 7.0 

Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), anhydrous 1.0 

Sodium salt of a linear alkylarylsulfonate 

(90% flake grade) 20.0 

Total 100.0 

7.7.4.2 Performance 

No loss of adhesion of the film to the metal. No blistering 

and no significant visual change in appearance when 

examined by the unaided eye. 

7.7.5 Window Cleaner Resistance 

7.7.5.1 Procedure 

Prepare a solution of glass cleaner. Apply 10 drops of the 

window cleaner to the painted surface and immediately 

cover it with a watch glass, convex side up. Let the test sit 

for 24 hours, then rinse the specimen with running tap 

water. Record visual appearance. Let the specimen sit for 

four hours before conducting the dry adhesion test outlined 

in Section 7.4.1.1 

All purpose glass cleaner composition as follows: 

Raw Materials % By Weight 

Dowanol PM* 

Propylene glycol 

Isopropanol 

Water 

5 

5 

35 

55 

*Dow Chemical, propylene glycol methyl ether 

The solution and test should be conducted at 18°C to 27°C 

(65°F to 80°F). 

7.7.5.2 Performance 

There shall be no blistering or noticeable change in 

appearance when examined by the unaided eye and no 

removal of film under the tape within or outside of the 

cross-hatched area. 

7.8 CORROSION RESISTANCE 

7.8.1 Humidity Resistance 

7.8.1.1 Procedure 

Expose the sample in a controlled heat-and-humidity 

cabinet for 3,000 hours at 38°C (100°F) and 100% RH with 

the cabinet operated in accordance with ASTM D 2247 or 

ASTM D 4585. 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 5

7.8.1.2 Performance 

No formation of blisters to extent greater than "Few" 

blisters Size No. 8, as shown in Figure No. 4, ASTM D 

714. 

7.8.2 Salt Spray Resistance 

7.8.2.1 Procedure 

Score the film sufficiently deep to expose the base metal 

using a sharp knife or blade instrument. Expose the 

sample for 3,000 hours according to ASTM B 117 using a 

5% salt solution. Remove and wipe sample dry. 

Immediately apply tape (Permacel 99 or equivalent) 20 

mm (3/4 in) wide over scored area by pressing down 

firmly against the coating to eliminate voids and air 

pockets. Sharply pull the tape off at a right angle to the 

plane of the surface being tested. 

7.8.2.2 Performance 

Minimum rating of seven on scribe or cut edges, and a 

minimum blister rating of eight within the test specimen 

field, in accordance with the following Table 1 and Table 

2 (Reference ASTM D 1654). 

TABLE 1 – Rating of Failure at Scribe (Procedure A)

Representative Mean Creepage From Scribe 

Millimeters Inches (Approx.) Rating Number

Zero 

Over 0 to 0.5 

Over 0.5 to 1.0 

Over 1.0 to 2.0 

Over 2.0 to 3.0 

Over 3.0 to 5.0 

Over 5.0 to 7.0 

Over 7.0 to 10.0 

Over 10.0 to 13.0 

Over 13.0 to 16.0 

Over 16.0 

0 

0 to 1/64 

1/64 to 1/32 

1/32 to 1/16 

1/16 to 1/8 

1/8 to 3/16 

3/16 to 1/4 

1/4 to 3/8 

3/8 to 1/2 

1/2 to 5/8 

Over 5/8 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

0 

TABLE 2 – Rating of Unscribed Areas (Procedure B) 

Area Failed, % Rating Number 

No Failure 

0 to 1 

2 to 3 

4 to 6 

7 to 10 

11 to 20 

21 to 30 

31 to 40 

41 to 55 

56 to 75 

Over 75 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

0 

NOTE: The use of a ruled plastic grid is recommended as 

an aid in evaluating this type of failure. A 6 mm (1/4 in) 

grid is suggested as most practical for the usual 

specimen. In using the grid, the number of squares in 

which one or more points of failure are found is related to 

the total number of squares covering the significant area 

of the specimen to get a percentage figure as used in the 

tabulation. In some instances, the rating numbers may be 

used as factors with exposure time intervals related 

thereto, to produce a performance index number which 

very accurately indicates relative quality. 

7.9 WEATHERING 

7.9.1 South Florida Exposure 

The coating shall maintain its film integrity and at a 

minimum meet the following color retention, chalk 

resistance, gloss retention and erosion resistance 

properties. The architect, owner or contractor should 

request data relative to the long-term durability of the 

color(s) selected. Exposure panels must be made available 

to the architect and/or owner upon request. 

7.9.1.1 Test Site and Duration 

Test sites for on-fence testing are acceptable as follows: 

Florida exposure South of latitude 27 degrees North at a 

45 degree angle facing South for a minimum of five (5) 

years. Time elapsed when the coating is off the test fence 

for evaluation, or other purposes, shall not be counted as 

part of the 5 year exposure minimum. 

7.9.1.2 Color Retention 

7.9.1.2.1 Performance 

Maximum of 5∆E Units (Hunter) of color change as 

calculated in accordance with ASTM D 2244, Section 6.3 

after the exposure test per Section 7.9.1.1. Color change 

shall be measured on the exposed painted surface which 

has been cleaned of external deposits with clear water and 

a soft cloth and corresponding values shall be measured 

on the original retained panel or the unexposed flap area 

of the panel. A portion of the exposed panel may be 

washed lightly to remove surface dirt only. Heavy 

scrubbing or any polishing to remove chalk formation or 

restore the surface is not permitted where color 

measurements are made. New colors, whether formulated 

by a paint manufacturer or blended by an applicator 

according to a paint manufacturer’s specifications, may be 

qualified without the exposure test per Section 7.9.1.1 

provided that they are produced with the same pigments 

in the same coating resin system as a color on which 

acceptable five (5) year test data is available and which is 

within ± 10 Hunter Units in lightness (L). 

7.9.1.3 Chalk Resistance 

7.9.1.3.1 Performance 

Chalking shall be no more than that represented by a No. 

8 rating based on ASTM D 4214, Test Method A (Method 

D 659) after test site (weathering) exposure (per Section 

7.9.1.1). Chalking shall be measured on an exposed, 

unwashed painted surface. 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 6

Dry film thickness exposed

Dry film thickness unexposed 

7.9.1.4 Gloss Retention 

7.9.1.4.1 Procedure 

After weathering exposure (per Section 7.9.1.1), measure 

60 degree gloss of exposed and unexposed areas of a test 

site exposure panel following ASTM D 523. The 

exposure panel may be washed lightly with clear water 

and a soft cloth to remove loose surface dirt. Heavy 

scrubbing or any polishing to restore the surface is not 

permitted where gloss measurements are made. 

7.9.1.4.2 Performance 

Gloss retention shall be a minimum of 30% after the 

exposure test per Section 7.9.1.1 expressed as: 

% Retention = X 100% 

7.9.1.5 Resistance to Erosion 

7.9.1.5.1 Procedure 

After weathering exposure (per Section 7.9.1.1), measure 

dry film thickness of exposed and adjacent unexposed 

areas of exposure panels using an Eddy Current Meter as 

defined in ASTM B 244 or other instrumental methods of 

equal precision. 

7.9.1.5.2 Performance 

Less than 10 percent film loss after the exposure test per 

Section 7.9.1.1 expressed as a percent loss of total film: 

Loss = 100% X 100% 

8.0 TEST REPORTS 

8.1 Test reports on file with the applicator shall include 

the following information: 

8.1.1 Date when tests were performed and date of issue of 

report. 

8.1.2 Identification of organic coating and/or coating 

system tested, including production date, batch or lot 

number, cure conditions, pre-treatment data, 

manufacturer's name and name of company submitting 

coated samples used in test. 

8.1.3 Copy of drawings submitted showing exposed 

surfaces. 

8.1.4 Test results. 

8.1.5 A statement indicating that the organic coating 

and/or coating system tested passed all tests or failed one 

or more. 

8.1.6 In the case of a failure, which test(s) and a 

description of the failure(s). 

8.1.7 Statement that all tests were conducted in 

accordance with this standard. 

8.1.8 Name and address of the laboratory which 

conducted tests and issued the report. 

60° gloss exposed

60° gloss unexposed 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
AAMA 2604-05 Page 7

9.0 REFERENCED STANDARDS 

References to the standards listed below shall be to the 

edition indicated. Any undated reference to a code or 

standard appearing in the requirements of this standard 

shall be interpreted as to referring to the latest edition of 

that code or standard. 

AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL 

MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (AAMA) 

AAMA 800-05, Voluntary Specifications and Test 

Methods for Sealants 

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND 

MATERIALS (ASTM) 

ASTM B 117-03, Standard Practice for Operating Salt 

Spray (Fog) Apparatus 

ASTM B 244-97(2002), Standard Test Method for 

Measurement of Thickness of Anodic Coatings on 

Aluminum and of Other Nonconductive Coatings on 

Nonmagnetic Basis Metals with Eddy-Current 

Instruments 

ASTM C 207-05, Standard Specification for Hydrated 

Lime for Masonry Purposes 

ASTM D 523-89(1999), Standard Test Method for 

Specular Gloss 

ASTM D 714-02, Standard Test Method for Evaluating 

Degree of Blistering of Paints 

ASTM D 968-93(2001), Standard Test Methods for 

Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by Falling 

Abrasive 

ASTM D 1400-00, Standard Test Method for 

Nondestructive Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of 

Nonconductive Coatings Applied to a Nonferrous Metal 

Base 

ASTM D 1654-05, Standard Test Method for Evaluation 

of Painted or Coated Specimens Subjected to Corrosive 

Environments 

ASTM D 2244-02e1, Standard Practice for Calculation of 

Color Tolerances and Color Differences from 

Instrumentally Measured Color Coordinates 

ASTM D 2247-02, Standard Practice for Testing Water 

Resistance of Coatings in 100% Relative Humidity 

ASTM D 2248-01a, Standard Practice for Detergent 

Resistance of Organic Finishes 

ASTM D 3359-02, Standard Test Methods for Measuring 

Adhesion by Tape Test 

ASTM D 3363-05, Standard Test Method for Film 

Hardness by Pencil Test 

ASTM D 4214-98, Standard Test Methods for Evaluating 

the Degree of Chalking of Exterior Paint Films 

ASTM D 4585-99, Standard Practice for Testing Water 

Resistance of Coatings Using Controlled Condensation 

ASTM D 5723-95(2002), Standard Practice for 

Determination of Chromium Treatment Weight on Metal 

Substrates by X-Ray Fluorescene 

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.
American Architectural Manufacturers Association 

1827 Walden Office Square, Suite 550 

Schaumburg, IL 60173 

PHONE (847)303-5664 FAX (847)303-5774

EMAIL webmaster@aamanet.org

WEBSITE www.aamanet.org

Copyright by the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA). This document was purchased by Husain Waheed of State Of Maryland, Dept. of Enviroment, ARMA on Fri Sep 6

2013. It may not be reproduced, republished or distributed in any format without the express written consent of AAMA.