alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 3, 2013

p0626

Order 

Clerk

July 3, 2013

146652

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146652

COA: 306868

Kalamazoo CC: 2007-000165-FC

ERVINE LEE DAVENPORT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. While the Court 

of Appeals erroneously failed to consider defendant’s claim in light of the United States 

Supreme Court decision in Holbrook v Flynn, 475 US 560, 570; 106 S Ct 1340; 89 L Ed 

2d 525 (1986) (“the question must be not whether jurors actually articulated a 

consciousness of some prejudicial effect, but rather whether ‘an unacceptable risk is 

presented of impermissible factors coming into play’”), citing Estelle v Williams, 425 US 

501, 505; 96 S Ct 1691; 48 L Ed 2d 126 (1976), the error was harmless under the facts of 

this case. Given the substantial evidence of guilt presented at trial, we cannot conclude 

that there was an unacceptable risk of impermissible factors coming into play.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILIP G. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Irene M. Keeley, District

Judge. (CR-94-8)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a)(1)(1994), to abolish the

supervised release portion of his sentence. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-94-8 (N.D.W. Va. July 9,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Moscow CableCom Corp. for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Mikhail A. Smirnov, Chief
Executive Officer, and Tate Fite, Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moscow CableCom Corp.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                      
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------
|May 4, 2007 |  | /s/    MIKHAIL A.
SMIRNOV            
|            |  | Mikhail A. Smirnov                   
|            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|            | 
|May 4, 2007 |  | /s/    TATE
FITE                     
|            |  | Tate Fite                            
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer              

This certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge the Report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Spirent plc (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | Date:  March 31, 2005
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      
| |  | Date:  March 31, 2005
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.0

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) by Intervest
Bancshares Corporation (the Company), each of the undersigned, as the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lowell S. Dansker                                  
|Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                          
|August 2, 2007                                         
|                                                       
|/s/ John J. Arvonio                                    
|John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                          
|August 2, 2007                                         
|                                                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SERVED: OCTOBER 14, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF FELTS FIELD AVIATION, INC.

DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-3307 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015WP910090) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative L Attachment-Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Felts Field Aviation, Respondent 14 East MainAve. Spokane, WA 99201-0405 Mark J. Conlin, Respondent's Counsel Conlin, Maloney & Miller 421 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 911 Spokane, W A 99201 TEL: 509-624-3020 FAX: 509-623-1650 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel Northwest MountainRegion, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 

### ONE COPY

Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-3307 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: TheraSource, LLC, Tyson Lin, and Christine L. Lin v. 

Houston Occupational Therapy, PLLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00877-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-30261

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Appellee, Houston Occupational Therapy, PLLC, has filed an objection to this 

Court’s memorandum order of referral to mediation. Appellee’s objection was filed within 

10 days of the Court’s order, and it states a reasonable basis for the objection to mediation. 

See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 154.022(b), (c). Accordingly, we withdraw our 

December 6, 2019 Memorandum Order of Referral to Mediation.

Appellants, TheraSource, LLC, Tyson Lin, and Christine L. Lin, have filed their 

first motion to extend time in this accelerated appeal, seeking a 45-day extension. Appellee 

filed a response in opposition, and appellants filed a reply. We grant in part appellants’ 

motion, and extend appellants’ briefing deadline to January 10, 2020. 

No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __December 17, 2019___
#### Hanley (James J.), Respondent, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.

*November 6, 1935*

February *4, 1936.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *Sltaw, Muskat & Paulsen*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Martin R. Paulsen.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *B. L. Berkwich*and *Gold & McCann,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Berkwich*and *Mr. Ray T. McCann.*

The following opinion was filed December 3, 1935 :

Per Curiam.

This case was tried with and is ruled by the decision in *Hanley (Ella) v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co., ante,*p. 281, 263 N. W. 638. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the record remanded with instructions to enter an order for a new trial.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on February 4, 1936.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99(a)

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Howard B. Bernick
-------------------------
President and Chief
Executive Officer
December 12, 2002
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1208 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, Texas, as the 

‘‘Converse Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1208 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CONVERSE VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 9155 Schaefer Road, Converse, 

4 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Converse 

5 Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Converse Veterans 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In re Patricia Ann LYONS and Claude Douglas Lyons, Debtors. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Patricia Ann LYONS and Claude Douglas Lyons, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 81-00307N.

Adv. 82-0001N.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N. D. Georgia, Newnan Division.

April 14, 1982.

*67John G. McCullough, Wilkinson & McCullough, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

David P. Mills, Mills & Mills, Forest Park, Ga., for defendants.

ORDER

W. HOMER DRAKE, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

On August 27,1981, the above-referenced debtors filed their petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On January 4, 1982, General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) filed its Complaint for Relief from the Automatic Stay, seeking to repossess and foreclose on a 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass automobile. On January 20, 1982, the debtors filed their answer to GMAC’s complaint. Paragraph Four of said answer admitted that the debtors have no equity in the 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass automobile.

The debtors have argued that any default is due to (1) the filing of a petition under the Bankruptcy Code, and (2) the refusal of GMAC to timely apply installment payments to the defendants’ account. The debtors argue further that under 11 U.S.C. § 365 and the broad purpose of the Bankruptcy Code, these technical defaults may be cured and should not subject the debtors to an adversary proceeding requesting relief from the automatic stay. While this argument has appeal, such is not the state of the law.

11 U.S.C. § 362 does not condition relief from the automatic stay on the fact that there has been a default by a debtor, although this is typically the case. Section 362(d)(2) provides that the Court *shall*grant relief from the stay if

> (A) the debtor does not have an equity in such property; and

> (B) such property is not necessary to an effective reorganization.”

In the instant case, the debtor is proceeding under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, a reorganization is not contemplated by the debtors. As stated above, the debtors have admitted that there is no equity in the subject property. Accordingly, relief from the automatic stay is mandated because the conditions set forth in § 362(d)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code have been met. See *In re Edward Jefferson Hart, Jr. (GMAC v. Edward Jefferson Hart, Jr.),*5 B.R. 524 (Bkrtcy.C.N.D.Ga., 1980).

Therefore, for the above-stated reasons, the plaintiff’s complaint for relief from the automatic stay is granted, and the plaintiff is permitted to repossess and foreclose upon its security interest in a certain 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass automobile, Vehicle Identification No. 3M47FAD450599.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00384

- CV
Eno Williams and Anthony Welch v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Fort Bend County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- CCV

- 066910

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT O F APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this deci s ion certified below for observance. March 17, 2022
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

In connectionwith this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mission Community Bancorp (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2003, I, Anita M. Robinson,President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             This Form 10-KSB forthe period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 28, 2004 |                                   |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                            |                                   |   |
|                            |                                   |   |
|                            | By:                                    |   | /s/ Anita M.  Robinson |
|                            | Anita M.  Robinson                     |   |
|                            | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |                                        |  |  |  |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home: Contact: Directory: J7

# J7 Training and Exercises Directorate 

 

Directory Links 

                          -  J0 - Special Staff   
                          -  J1 - Manpower and Personnel Directorate   
                          -  J2 - Intelligence Directorate   
                          -  J3 - Operations Directorate   
                          -  J4 - Logistics and Engineering Directorate    
                          -  J5 - Strategic Planning and Policy Directorate   
                          -  J6 - Command, Control, Communications and Cyber Directorate   
                          -  J7 - Training and Exercises Directorate   
                          -  J8 - Requirements and Resources Directorate   
                          -  Joint Interagency Task Force West   

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector GeneralAccessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Flickr
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 6, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E3-E4]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

INTRODUCING LEGISLATION TO STUDY METHODS OF ERADICATING ASIAN CARP FROM 
                       THE GREAT LAKES ECOSYSTEM

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. MARK STEVEN KIRK

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, January 6, 2009

  Mr. KIRK. Madam Speaker, I am proud to stand here today to introduce 
legislation which provides for the exploration of methods to eradicate 
the dangerous Asian carp from the Great Lakes.
  Each year, invasive species in the Great Lakes cause more than $5 
billion in economic damage and irreparable harm to an ecosystem that 
provides more than 40 million people with jobs. water, food. and 
recreation. A new invader, the Asian carp, threatens to further destroy 
the region's ecosystem and economy, and it is imperative that we act to 
prevent this catastrophe.
  A single barrier in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, built as a 
temporary demonstration project 5 years ago, is the only thing 
preventing these invaders from entering Lake Michigan and drastically 
altering the entire region's ecosystem. While Congress recently 
provided full authorization and funding for this critical barrier, it 
may not be enough to prevent the Asian carp from infiltrating the Great 
Lakes and the devastating consequences that would follow.
  It is therefore critical that we also explore alternatives and 
supplements to the carp barrier. My legislation would direct the Fish 
and Wildlife Service in conjunction with the National Atmospheric and 
Oceanic Administration and

[[Page E4]]

Great Lakes States to conduct a study on the feasibility of a variety 
of approaches to eradicating Asian carp from the Great Lakes. The 
legislation specifically directs the agencies to study the feasibility 
of temporarily harvesting Asian carp as a means to eradicate the 
invasive species in an environmentally responsible manner.
  I urge my colleagues to support this legislation to explore all 
possibilities to effectively eliminate the threat that this dangerous 
species poses to our Nation's most precious natural resource.

                          ____________________
```