alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

# J92/J95 Strategic Partnerships/Public Diplomacy

Aloha and Welcome to Strategic Partnerships!

The J92 guiding vision is to inspire strategic leaders to solve problems of sustainability by working with the civil, private and public sectors.

#### Mission

Develop dynamic partnerships with the public, private and civil sectors that promote a mutual understanding of security and build partnership capacity between nations.

In order to accomplish this we strive to achieve the following goals:

**Goal 1:** Promote & develop dynamic partnerships with the public and private sectors that facilitate joint ventures which share resources and rewards while reducing risks

**Goal 2**: Maintain & expand relationships with other regional partners in order to promote mutual understanding and collaboration

**Goal 3**: Facilitate collaboration with institutions, scholars and practitioners in the world that can  assist J00 in improved planning and informed decision making. 

About DoDDoD CareersJoin the MilitaryNewsUSA.govPhotos & VideosPrivacy & SecurityTop Issues

US INDOPACOM Inspector GeneralDoD Inspector GeneralAccessibility/Section 508DoD FOIAUS INDOPACOM FOIALink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActRecovery ActINDOPACOM Webmaster

                  - Facebook
                  - X
                  - YouTube
                  - Instagram
                  - RSS

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2018

No. 04-18-00520-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.R.T, C.C.T., A.T., CHILDREN,

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-16-59

The Honorable Selina Nava Mireles, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due September 4, 2018. On September 7, 2018, appellant filed a 

“Corrected Motion for Additional Records and to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief,”

requesting an extension of time to file her brief because the reporter’s record is not complete. In 

her motion, appellant states a copy of the record from the trial proceedings held on September 

15, 2017 has not been filed in this court. A review of the clerk’s record indicates trial 

proceedings occurred on several dates, including September 15, 2017, and copy of the reporter’s 

record for that day has not been filed. 

Based on the foregoing, we GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time, and we 

ORDER the court reporter, Mary Buitron, to file the missing portion of the reporter’s record on 

or before September 18, 2018. The court reporter is reminded that by statute, this appeal is 

accelerated, and is to take precedence over other matters. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(a1) (West Supp. 2017). Moreover, strict deadlines exist with regard to disposal of appeals dealing 

with termination of parental rights — specifically, the appellate court must dispose of the appeal 

within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed in the trial court. Appellant’s brief is due 

twenty (20) days after the reporter’s record is filed. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court 

reporter, Mary Buitron. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# VOR T

DODG E Airpor t Februar y 8 , 201 0 

### FOR T DODG EREGIONA LAIRPOR I 163 9 Nelso n Avenue , Suit e 2 • For t Dodge , l

A 5050 1 515.571388 1 Ext . 3 • Fdairportt'Ofortclodgeiowa.or g Dennis) . DeVany , Chie f EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 

## D6<^<« TtiOTOiTXx)o|./OU2 -

RE : DELT

A AIRLINE S PROPOSALFO REAS CONTRAC T CHANG E DIREC T FLIGHT S FRO M FO D T O MS P Dea rMr . DeVany : Ou r Airpor t Commissio n enthusiasticall y endorse s th e recen t proposa l b y Delt aAirline s t o provicte; ' u s wit htw o dail y direc t

roun dtri p flight s connectin g wit hMinneapolis-St . Pau l Airport . Thes e r 5 flight s ar e propose dt o b e seve n day s pe r week . Sinc e thi s propose dchang e necessitate s arevisiof f withi n ou r

Essentia l Ai

r Servic e (EAS ) progra mcontract , w e encourag e yo u t o suppor t an dapprov e thi s servic e enhancemen t for Fort Dodge . Th e transitio n fro mNW

A t o Delt aha s bee n seamles s an dth e servic e level s hav e bee n wel l received . Th e EA

S i s avita l componen t

of ou r region' s economi c an dtransportatio n mode l an dw e encourag e you r

continue dsuppor t We ar e confiden t

tha t th e adoptio n o f

th e proposa l wil l serv e Delt aan dou r regio n well . Ou r anticipatio n i s tha t

th e direc t

flight componen t

wil l increas e utilizatio n an dsuppor t fo r ou r servic e b y ou r are abusinesse s an dcustomers . Perceptio n o f ou r accessibilit y t o th e natio n an dworl d woul dals o b e enhanced . Than k yo u fo r th e opportunit y t o commen t o n th e propose dchange s t o ou r EA S contrac t

a s Delt ai s offerin g agrea t

enhancemen t

an dbenefi t

t o ou r ai r service .

,nv>i.xi\ . Debr aJohnspn , Vice-Chairma n X-<:-^-> . ^ u 

# : ^A' C Dea n Getting , Airpor t

Commissione r 

## •^^ ^ f)'^'i \ 1 To mKregel.'Airpdr t

Commissione r 

# • A^-V't ' Joh n Blrkett , Airpor t

Commissione r
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.2 [CONSOLIDATED WATER LOGO] CERTIFIED EXTRACT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING OF CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD. (THE COMPANY) HELD ON
THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2004. IT WAS RESOLVED as a Special Resolution that the Companys Articles of
Association be amended as follows: (1) By the deletion of Article 8.04;  (2)
    
    By the renumbering of the first of the two Articles numbered 8.05 as 8.04; (3) By the deletion from the first sentence of Article 9.02 of the words but
in either case the Directors shall have the same right to decline or suspend
registration as they would have had in the case of a transfer by the holder,
together with the comma immediately preceding these words. /s/ Brent Santha  
 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 115 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 115

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Thin Blue Line Act''.

SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY.

    Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (16) the following:
            ``(17) Killing or targeting of law enforcement officer.--
                    ``(A) The defendant killed or attempted to kill, in 
                the circumstance described in subparagraph (B), a 
                person who is authorized by law--
                            ``(i) to engage in or supervise the 
                        prevention, detention, investigation, or 
                        prosecution, or the incarceration of any person 
                        for any criminal violation of law;
                            ``(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or prosecute 
                        an individual for any criminal violation of 
                        law; or
                            ``(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 
                        responder.
                    ``(B) The circumstance referred to in subparagraph 
                (A) is that the person was killed or targeted--
                            ``(i) while he or she was engaged in the 
                        performance of his or her official duties;
                            ``(ii) because of the performance of his or 
                        her official duties; or
                            ``(iii) because of his or her status as a 
                        public official or employee.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 115

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.
```
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on April 30, 2022
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

2
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

3
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

4
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

5
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

6
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

 7
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 
11/18/20
DFR
12/10/20
Closed

8
18-1864
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
12/07/20
DFR
12/23/20
Closed

9
18-0242
Onekey, LLC
02/05/21
DFR
02/18/21
Closed

10 
18-0731
UHS of Delaware, Inc. and Premier Behavioral Health Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral Health Center
05/19/21
DFR
05/21/21
Closed

11
18-1287
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

12
18-1288
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

13
18-0701
Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.
10/21/21
DFR
11/09/21
Closed

14
20-0762
CentiMark Corporation
10/27/21
DFR
11/09/21
Closed

15
20-0653
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
10/28/21
DFR
11/05/21
Closed

16
19-0622
Anthony Marano Co.
02/10/22
DFR
02/16/22
Open

17
20-0541
Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey Cleary Builders
03/03/22
DFR
03/11/22
Open

18
19-0550
UHS of Denver, Inc., d/b/a Highlands Behavioral Health System
03/31/22
DFR
04/06/22
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
#### THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES.

*Practice — Supreme Court — Record.*

When the record of a case brought up on appeal to this Court is imperfect, the case will bo remanded to the Court below

Civil ActioN to recover possession of land, tried at Eall Term, 1876, of Polii Superior Court, before *Schenck, J.*

In consequence of an imperfect record there was no decision upon the merits and the case was rema..ded to the Court below.

*Messrs. Smith £*Strong, for plaintiff.

*Messrs. M. JET. 'Justice*and *W. J.*Montgomery, for defendant..

Reade, J,

There is no complaint'in the record. There is only an amended answer. There is no statement of the *205case made out by tbe appellant and none by the appellee ; nor is there any agreement that His Honor should make one. There is however a statement by His Honor that it was an action for two parcels ‘ of land, that the plaintiff offered in evidence a number of deeds, none of which are set out or appended, some of which were admitted as color of title only, .one rejected because not properly proved and registered, that a number of witnesses were introduced as to possession and boundaries, and that he nonsuited the plaintiff. But why he nonsuited him is not stated.

There are no points stated or questions presented for the decision of this Court. It is possible that we might hit upon the matters in dispute, but we cannot jeopardize the rights of the parties upon such records.

The case is remanded, each party paying his own costs in this Court.

Pee, Cx/RiAM. Judgment accordingly.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

Committee (FRRCC)

MEETING AGENDA

December 12, 2011

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ariel Rios North Building, Room 3530

9:30 am Registration

10:00 Call to Order / Discussion of Meeting Agenda

 Alicia Kaiser, FRRCC Designated Federal Officer

 Steven Balling, FRRCC Chair

 Lawrence Elworth, Agricultural Counselor to the Administrator, 

EPA

10:15 Formal Approval of Final FRRCC Report

11:00 Discuss Briefing Schedule for Senior EPA and USDA Officials

11:15 Discuss Ideas for Future of FRRCC

12:00 pm Adjourn
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 28, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40536

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH W. TURNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-1417-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth W. Turner appeals his conviction on two counts of

transporting aliens within the United States for private

financial gain by means of a motor vehicle in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1324. Turner argues that the district court erred by

refusing to give a requested jury instruction on the requirement

that the Government provide additional evidence of a defendant’s

guilty knowledge when contraband is found in a hidden

compartment.
No. 03-40536

-2-

The type of instruction Turner requests is generally given

only in controlled substance cases. See Note, FIFTH CIRCUIT PATTERN

JURY INSTRUCTION 1.31 (Criminal Cases). Neither party has cited a

decision addressing the applicability of such an instruction when

the hidden cargo consists of human beings rather than controlled

substances. However, assuming arguendo that such an instruction

is available in this type of case, we conclude that Turner has

not shown that he was entitled to the instruction.

If contraband is not “clearly visible or readily

accessible,” control over the vehicle alone is insufficient to

prove knowledge of the contraband. See United States v.

Pennington, 20 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal quotation

and citation omitted). The “threshold issue” is whether the

contraband is “hidden”; if it is hidden, then the Government must

produce “further evidence of knowledge.” Id.

We conclude that the aliens discovered in the sleeper

compartment of Turner’s tractor-trailer were not “hidden.” Even

if we assume that the aliens were not “clearly visible” from the

driver’s seat, they clearly were “readily accessible” from that

position. Because the aliens were not hidden, Turner was not

entitled to the requested instruction, and the district court did

not abuse its discretion in refusing to give the instruction. 

See United States v. Barnett, 197 F.3d 138, 142 (5th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), David Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|Date: July 31, 2009 | /s/ DAVID DUTTON
                     David DuttonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H93]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   HONORING THE LIFE OF DENNIS BARNEY

  (Mr. FLAKE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. FLAKE. Madam Speaker, every so often a community is blessed with 
a giant of a man, a man whose imprint and influence will be felt for 
generations to come. Such is the case with Dennis Barney, who passed 
away this week at the far too young age of 62.
  Countless organizations like the United Way, the Boy Scouts, the Boys 
and Girls Club, the United Food Bank and the Arizona Interfaith 
Movement have profited from his generosity. Thousands of students, 
families and individuals have benefited from his kindness, his example 
and his inspired counsel.
  Still, it was within the walls of his own home that his most 
important work was accomplished. Along with his wife, Ann, he raised a 
remarkable family of 10 children who will surely carry on his great 
legacy.
  May every community in every State across this great land be so 
blessed as to know such a giant of a man as Dennis Barney.

                          ____________________
```
#### In the Matter of Peter Santiago, Appellant, v Elizabeth Roman, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 753]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated September 30, 2002, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Levy, H.E.), dated June 13, 2002, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the mother’s petition for an upward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order dated September 30, 2002, is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the objections are sustained, the order dated June 13, 2002, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing and determination in accordance herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that pending the new hearing and determination, the father shall pay child support in the sum of $56 per month, in accordance with the order dated June 13, 2002.

There was insufficient evidence before the Family Court to ensure a proper determination of the father’s child support obligation under the Child Support Standards Act (hereinafter CSSA) (Family Ct Act § 413). The hearing examiner, in its application of the CSSA, allocated 100% of the parental income to the father. In addition, the hearing examiner found that no deviation from the CSSA was warranted based on the needs of the father’s other three children whom he supports, because his current wife made a lifestyle choice to home school those children, and not to work outside the home. Without any inquiry having been made concerning the mother’s ability to work, we cannot determine whether the support obligation imposed upon *690the father was proper under the CSSA, or was otherwise unjust or inappropriate (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f] [8]; *cf. Matter of Wevers v Brizzi,*90 AD2d 797 [1982]).

Accordingly, we remit the matter for a new hearing to determine the father’s child support obligation. Pending that determination, the father shall continue to pay child support of $56 per month. Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.70**

**[Form of U.S. Award Letter –Letterhead]**

**Grant Date:            **

**Award Amount:$             (USD)**

[Name] 

[Address] 

Dear [Name]: 

Wyeth considers it essential to continue to provide long-term incentives for key personnel of Wyeth to remain employed with Wyeth and focused on achieving a high level ofperformance. To this end, in order to provide you with sufficient long-term incentives to continue to use your best efforts to perform your duties and responsibilities diligently and in the best interests of Wyeth and Wyeth’s stockholders,Wyeth has elected to establish the Wyeth 2009 Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan. All capitalized terms not defined in this letter are defined in the Plan document (a copy of which can be found at http://insidewyeth.com/WyethLTInformation).

I am pleased to inform you that you have been selected as a Participant in the Plan. This letter constitutes your Award Letter under the Plan. Subject inall instances to the terms and conditions of the Plan, you and Wyeth agree to the following: 

1. Grant Date. You are hereby grantedthis Award on the Grant Date specified above. 

2. Award Opportunity. The grant of this Award provides you with the opportunity toearn a payment equal to the Award Amount (specified above), pursuant to the terms of Section 5 of the Plan. If you reside outside of the United States, the amount of your Award payable will be converted, on the date such Award is to be paid,using the exchange rate in effect on such date, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion, into the currency in which you receive payment of your salary or wages from the Company. 

3. Vesting and Payment of Award. Subject to Sections 5(c) and (d) of the Plan, your Award will become immediately vested as to 100% of theAward Amount on the third anniversary of the Grant Date, subject to your continued employment with the Company through such date. In general, subject to Section 5(e) of the Plan, your Award will be paid in a lump sum as promptly as practicableafter the date the Award vests (but in no event later than ten (10) Business Days after such date). For the avoidance of doubt, your Award will not become immediately vested upon any voluntary resignation by you due to your retirement with theCompany. 

4. Amendment. The terms of this Award Letter may not be amended, modified or terminated other than by a written agreementexecuted by the parties hereto (or their respective successors). The laws of the State of New Jersey will govern this Award Letter, without reference to the principles of conflict of laws.