alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USS Ashland Visits Malaysia during 7th Fleet Operations

By MC2 Markus CastanedaUSS Ashland Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1312 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1312

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 to require 
   an annual review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the 
  annual government-business forum on capital formation that is held 
                         pursuant to such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Capital Formation 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT-BUSINESS FORUM ON CAPITAL 
              FORMATION.

    Section 503 of the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 
(15 U.S.C. 80c-1) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The Commission shall--
            ``(1) review the findings and recommendations of the forum; 
        and
            ``(2) each time the forum submits a finding or 
        recommendation to the Commission, promptly issue a public 
        statement--
                    ``(A) assessing the finding or recommendation of 
                the forum; and
                    ``(B) disclosing the action, if any, the Commission 
                intends to take with respect to the finding or 
                recommendation.
    ``(f) Forum Findings.--Nothing in this section shall require the 
Commission to agree to or act upon any finding or recommendation of the 
forum.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1312

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 to require 
   an annual review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the 
  annual government-business forum on capital formation that is held 
                         pursuant to such Act.
```
June 15, 2015

Mr. Shayn Mitchell 

812 Palm Terrace 

Escondido, CA 92025 

Dear Mr. Mitchell: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2113), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Navy Fire and Emergency Services Personnel Respond to Yokosuka Warehouse Fire 

By Petty Officer 1st Class Peter BurghartFleet Activities Yokosuka

                YOKOSUKA, Japan  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Report of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc., an Ohio
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Wayne R. Hellman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Wayne R. Hellman
-----------------------
Wayne R. Hellman
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2002
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 127 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to urbanized area 

formula grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

urbanized area formula grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation for He5 roes Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. URBANIZED AREA FORMULA GRANTS. 

7 Section 5307(c)(1)(D) of title 49, United States 

8 Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 127 IH

1 (2) in clause (iii) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the 

2 semicolon at the end; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(iv) veteran (as such term is defined 

5 in section 101 of title 38);’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|   | November 8, 2007 | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                            |   |
|--------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |             | Graham V. Smith                                                |
|   |             | Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will beretained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### In re Joseph A. DUFFY and Leslie K. Duffy, Debtors. John BOYAJIAN, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF RHODE ISLAND, INC., Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 7900043.

Adv. No. 800078.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.

Sept. 11, 1981.

John Boyajian, Boyajian, Coleman & Harrington, Providence, R. I., for trustee.

Thomas C. Mullaney, Jr., Connors & Kil-guss, Providence, R. I., for defendant.

ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S COMPLAINT ALLEGING TRUTH IN LENDING VIOLATIONS

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Heard on the Trustee’s complaint alleging that the Defendant, in several respects, violated the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601, et seq. (Truth in Lending Act), and Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. §§ 226.1, et seq., in connection with a loan made to the Debtors.

Specifically, the Trustee alleges that the Defendant failed to: (1) make necessary *10disclosures clearly, conspicuously or in meaningful sequence; (2) accurately state the amount of the finance charge; (3) accurately state the annual percentage rate; and (4) provide a duplicate copy of the disclosure statement to the Debtors.

Based on the entire record, and for the reasons stated in the Trustee’s Memorandum of Law, I find for the Trustee as to allegations (2), (3), and (4) of his complaint. The Trustee has failed to satisfy the burden of proof regarding allegation (1), and as to that item, I conclude that there is no violation.

Also, based on the evidence, I make the specific finding of fact that the boxes checked, indicating acceptance of credit life insurance and credit health and accident insurance, on the original copy of the loan disclosure statement, Defendant’s Exh. No. 2, but not the Debtors’ copy, Trustee’s Exh. A, were marked by Associates *after*the Debtors signed and returned the original to the lender.

Violation of any disclosure requirement mandates that damages be assessed against the creditor. 15 U.S.C. § 1640. Accordingly, damages are assessed in the amount of $1,000.00 as to each Debtor,1 plus interest, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees. *See Boyajian v. Associates Financial Services (In re Sherman),*13 B.R. 259 (Bkrtcy.D.R.I.1981). The attorney for the Trustee shall file his application for costs and attorney’s fees within ten days. The Defendant should request a hearing within ten days thereafter if it desires to question the reasonableness of said application.

1

. The Truth in Lending Act requires that damages be awarded in the amount of twice the finance charge, except that liability shall not be less than $100.00 nor greater than $1,000.00. 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(2)(A)(i). Here, the finance charge amounts to $699.46. It is with reluctance that I award damages to each Debtor, but feel constrained to do so because of *Tarplain v. Baker Ford, Inc.,*466 F.Supp. 1340 (D.R.I.1979), reversed on other grounds, 618 F.2d 94 (1st Cir. 1980).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(a)

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      AIG SUNAMERICA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY

      Pursuant to the authority of A.R.S. Section 10-1006, the Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation for AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company are
amended as follows:

1.    The preamble of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is
amended in its entirety to read as follows:

            In line 1 of the preamble, reference to incorporators is changed to
      directors.

                  We, the undersigned directors, for the purposes of amending
            and restating the Articles of Incorporation of SunAmerica National
            Life Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation, do hereby adopt the
            following Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation for said
            corporation

2.    ARTICLE IV is amended in its entirety as follows:

            In lines 8-9 of the Article, reference to SunAmerica National Life
      Insurance Company is changed to AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company.

                                   ARTICLE IV

                  Upon the approval of the Amended and Restated Articles of
            Incorporation by the necessary regulatory authorities, AIG
            SunAmerica Life Assurance Company shall be and continue to be
            possessed of all privileges, franchises and powers to the same
            extent as if it had been originally incorporated under the laws of
            the State of Arizona; and all privileges, franchises and powers
            belonging to said corporation, and all property, real, personal and
            mixed, and all debts due on whatever account, all Certificates of
            Authority, agent appointments, and all choses in action, shall be
            and the same are hereby ratified approved, confirmed and assured to
            AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company with like effect and to all
            intents and purposes as if it had been originally incorporated under
            the laws of the State of Arizona.

3.    Each and every other Article of the Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation shall be unchanged and remain in full force and effect.

<PAGE>
4.    The Board of Directors approved the amendments on September 20, 2002.

5.    Shareholder approval was not required.


Dated: September 30, 2002.


                                       AIG SUNAMERICA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY

                                       By:    /s/ CHRISTINE A. NIXON
                                              ----------------------------------
                                       Name:  Christine A. Nixon
                                       Title: Secretary


Attested to this 30th day of September, 2002:


By: /s/ VIRGINIA N. PUZON
    ---------------------------
    Name: Virginia N. Puzon
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0163

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LUIS MARTINEZ MONTOYA, 

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until July 16, 2021, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 16 2021

06/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0163
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55002-55003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22667]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a briefing and planning 
meeting of the Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will be 
held at the Legislative Building, Hearing Group Room 2C, 210 Capitol 
Avenue, Hartford, CT, 06106, and will convene at 9 a.m. on Tuesday, 
September 20, 2011. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to discuss 
police practices and the changing demographics in Connecticut. The 
purpose of the planning meeting is to plan future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Thursday, October 
20, 2011. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, fax to (202) 376-7548, or e-mail to ero@usccr.gov. Persons 
wishing to present their comments verbally at the meeting, should 
contact Ivy Davis, Director, Eastern Regional Office at (202) 376-7533 
(or for the hearing impaired at TDD 800-877-8339).
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,

[[Page 55003]]

http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 31, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-22667 Filed 9-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
No. 81-1717.

#### American Bank & Trust Co. et al. *v.*Dallas County et al.; Bank of Texas et al. *v.*Childs et al.; and Wynnewood Bank & Trust et al. *v.*Childs et al.

Ct. App. Tex., 5th Sup. Jud. Dist. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 966.] Motion of Texas Association of Appraisal Districts et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       12785 
<SECURITIES>                                951448 
<RECEIVABLES>                               198520 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  73522 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            313785 
<PP&E>                                      119653 
<DEPRECIATION>                                6142 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              433438 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       306994 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   6914773 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                (5390083)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                433438 
<SALES>                                      53136 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             53136 
<CGS>                                        37122 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                37122 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            372263 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (356249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (356249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (356249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)
        

</TABLE>
No. 90-499.

No. 90-680.

#### Acmat Corp. *v.*School District of Philadelphia; and School District of Philadelphia *v.*Acmat Corp.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 904 F. 2d 693 and 696.