alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          79,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,183)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,122
<PP&E>                                       1,556,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                (88,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,693,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,985
<BONDS>                                        706,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           438
<OTHER-SE>                                     608,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,693,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,802
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,196
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analogic Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael L. Levitz, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                            
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /S/    MICHAEL L.
LEVITZ                                                                   
|Date: October 4, 2011 |  | Michael L. Levitz                                                                          
|                      |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### THE STATE *v.*ANDREW HEMPHILL, et al.

An indictment charging a forcible trespass for taking a slain deer, is not supported by evidence of the forcible taking of a deerskin severed from the body of the deer.

The defendants were tried at Burke on the last circuit before his Honor Judge Dick, upon an indictment for forcibly and with a strong hand taking from the possession of the prosecutor a slain deer. The evidence offered showed that the defendants were hunters, and were, with their dogs, in chase of the deer, and that the prosecutor, not being one of the hunting party, shot and killed the deer. A dispute arose between the defendants and prosecutor as to who had the better title to the game thus taken. They compromised the matter; and it was agreed that the deer should be then skinned, and that the carcass should be the property of the defendants, and the skin should be the property of the prosecutor. Jn pursuance of this agreement, the deer was skinned ; and the defendants immediately thereafter, with strong hand, took the skin from the possession of the prosecutor. His Honor was of opinion,- and so instructed the jury, that this evidence supported the indictment. - The jury found *110the defendants guilty, and judgment being pronounced thereon> the defendants appealed.

Dec. 1838.

No counsel appeared for the defendants in this Court. 1 1

The *Attorney General,*for the State.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the case as above, proceeded : It is not necessary for us to decide the question who in law was entitled to the slain deer, if no agreement had been made between the parties concerning it. The parties having first disputed the title, are now bound by the compromise and agreement. The carcass was by the agreement the property of the defendants ; the skin when severed from the body of the deer, was the property and in the possession of *the*prosecutor. We do not agree with the Judge, *that the*evidence of a forcible trespass in taking a deer skin severed from the body, will support an indictment charging the defendants with forcibly taking a slain deer. These articles of property are very different and distinct. If a man indicted for forcibly taking one species of personal property, could be convicted by proof that he took another species of personal property, no man would know how to defend himself: —he would be constantly liable to be entrapped. We are of opinion that there must be a new trial.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H378]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO CUBA--MESSAGE FROM 
         THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES (H. DOC. NO. 111-9)

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following message 
from the President of the United States; which was read and, together 
with the accompanying papers, without objection, referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed:

To the Congress of the United States:
  Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) 
provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, 
prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President 
publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a 
notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the 
anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent the 
enclosed notice to the Federal Register for publication, stating that 
the national emergency declared with respect to the Government of 
Cuba's destruction of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in 
international airspace north of Cuba on February 24, 1996, as amended 
and expanded on February 26, 2004, is to continue in effect beyond 
March 1, 2009.
                                                      George W. Bush.  
The White House, January 15, 2009.

                          ____________________
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

J. R. WILKERSON, AKA Adonai ElShaddai, AKA James Wilkerson, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

M. D. STAINER, Secretary, CDCR, 

Individual Capacity; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55287 

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-09313-RGK-JC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

J.R. Wilkerson, aka Adonai El-Shaddai, aka James Wilkerson (“ElShaddai”) appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action 

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-55287 

Persons Act, alleging constitutional and statutory violations related to the exercise 

of his religion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, El-Shaddai failed to challenge the district court’s 

screening order dismissing his second amended complaint for failure to state a 

claim, and therefore El-Shaddai has waived any such challenge. See Smith v. 

Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in 

its opening brief are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th 

Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare 

assertion does not preserve a claim . . . .”).

In light of our disposition, appellees’ motions to revoke El-Shaddai’s in 

forma pauperis status (Docket Entry No. 5) and to take judicial notice (Docket 

Entry No. 6) are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2481

RITU CHANDRA, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY; RICHARD BROOKMAN, M.D.;

ROBIN FOSTER, M.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-99-55-3)

Submitted: June 9, 2000 Decided: July 24, 2000

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ritu Chandra, Appellant Pro Se. Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ritu Chandra appeals from the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Medical College of Virginia (“MCV”) and

other defendants in her civil action alleging she was improperly

discharged from MCV’s residency program due to her race and

national origin. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. See Chandra v. Medical

College of Virginia, No. CA-99-55-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED
LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,626
<SECURITIES>                                       350
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                       831
<INVENTORY>                                     44,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,992
<PP&E>                                         125,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,547
<BONDS>                                        109,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,352
<SALES>                                        138,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,324
<CGS>                                           92,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,166)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.35)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1210 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1210

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ``Pleasanton 
                        Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLEASANTON VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Pleasanton Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Pleasanton 
Veterans Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1210

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ``Pleasanton 
                        Veterans Post Office''.
```
No. 86-646.

#### TWC Holdings, Inc. *v.*John F. Harkins Co., Inc.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White and Justice O’Connor would grant certiorari.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-52265, 333-04835, and 333-64998 on Form S-3 of Alaska Airlines, Inc. of our
report dated February 27, 2004 (May 20, 2004 for Note 13) (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets", discussed in Note 12 to the financial statements and the
revision described in Note 13), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of Alaska Airlines, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington

May 20, 2004
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1012 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar limitation 

on employer-provided group term life insurance that can be excluded 

from the gross income of the employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the dollar limitation on employer-provided group term 

life insurance that can be excluded from the gross income 

of the employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Group Term Life In5 surance Increase Act of 2017’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1012 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION FOR EM2 PLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP TERM LIFE IN3 SURANCE PURCHASED FOR EMPLOYEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 79(a)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘$375,000’’. 

7 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 79 of such 

8 Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 subsection: 

10 ‘‘(g) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable 

12 year beginning after 2018, the $375,000 amount 

13 under subsection (a)(1) shall be increased by an 

14 amount equal to— 

15 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

16 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter17 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

18 year in which the taxable year begins, deter19 mined by substituting ‘2017’ for ‘1992’ in sub20 paragraph (B) thereof. 

21 ‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If any amount as adjusted 

22 under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, 

23 such amount shall be rounded to the nearest mul24 tiple of $10,000.’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1012 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1181 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 

which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. CONAWAY, and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under which certain persons may be treated as 

adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans 2nd Amend5 ment Protection Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1181 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER2 SONS AS ADJUDICATED MENTALLY INCOM3 PETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 5501A 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 5501B. Conditions for treatment of certain persons 

8 as adjudicated mentally incompetent for 

9 certain purposes 

10 ‘‘Notwithstanding any determination made by the 

11 Secretary under section 5501A of this title, in any case 

12 arising out of the administration by the Secretary of laws 

13 and benefits under this title, a person who is mentally in14 capacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or experi15 encing an extended loss of consciousness shall not be con16 sidered adjudicated as a mental defective under subsection 

17 (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18 without the order 

18 or finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial author19 ity of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger 

20 to himself or herself or others.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended 

23 by inserting after the item relating to section 5501A the 

24 following new item: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1181 IH

‘‘5501B. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Marine Military Police Complete Field Training Exercise in Okinawa

By Cpl. Jonah BaaseIII Marine Expeditionary Force

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Morew News