alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ludger
Viefhues, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




August 12, 2003                                /s/ LUDGER VIEFHUES
                                               ---------------------------
                                                   Ludger Viefhues
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Mattson Technology, Inc. and will
be retained by Mattson Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

To extend the pilot program under section 258 of the National Housing 

Act that establishes an automated process for providing alternative credit 

rating information for mortgagors and prospective mortgagors under 

certain mortgages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To extend the pilot program under section 258 of the National Housing Act that establishes an automated process 

for providing alternative credit rating information for 

mortgagors and prospective mortgagors under certain 

mortgages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Alternative Cred5 it Pilot Program Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 123 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

2 Section 258(d) of the National Housing Act (12 

3 U.S.C. 1715z–24(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘5-year’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘14-year’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal A\'iadon Administration

14 CFR Pan 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1067; Dil"ectorate Identifier 2009-NM-071-AD; Amendme

1

11516 ;J.?' ••J-io 9-""". AD 201()..•• j:'.••. 1

RlN 2120-AA64

I

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2-1 C, B2K-3C, 82-203. 84-2C,

B4--103, and 84-203 Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, 84-620. B4-622,

B4-605R. B4-622R.. and F4--G05R Airplanes

I

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration fF¥), Department of Trans po nation

(DOT).

A\4'M- "t-

'-"'" ',''",

(,~

ACTION: Final rule. I

SUMM.-\RY; Weare superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

products listed above. This AD results from manhatory continuing airworthiocss

infom~ation (MeAl) originated by an aviaLion JUlOTitY of another country \0 ldenli fy ."," '".I"

I ~-Im

and correcl an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe .''''.11.'''',

condition as:

Following the occurrence of cracks on fur MLG [main landing gearl rib 5

RH [right~hand) and LH [left-hand] anac~ment fining lower nanges.

IXiAC [Direction Generale de I'Aviation Civile] France AD 1003-3 J 8(8)

[parallel to part of FAA AD 2006.12~131Iwas issued 10 require repetitive

inspections and, as tenninaling action"'. "*[.]

,.".,',..
EXHIBIT 32.1

             Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mattson  Technology,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 26, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2004

                                                     By:    /s/ DAVID DUTTON
                                                         -----------------------
                                                              David Dutton
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




DUTCH
      GOLD RESOURCES, INC.;





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Certified Services, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2007 (the "Report"), the undersigned,
      in
      the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  
      The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10–QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
      Certification is signed on November 15, 2007.







/s/Daniel
                W.
                HollisDaniel
                W.
                HollisChief
                Executive and Financial
                OfficerDutch
                Gold Resources, Inc.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                             ------------

                            CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal
quarter ended March 28, 2003, I, William F. Wright, Chairman and Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: May 12, 2003               /s/ William F. Wright
                                -------------------------
                                Title: Chairman and Principal
                                        Executive Officer

                                AMCON Distributing Company


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to AMCON Distributing Company and will be retained by AMCON
Distributing Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 24.1
                       Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Orange-co, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-
17386) on Form S-8 of Orange-co, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
December 4, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Orange-co Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for the year then ended, which report appears in the September 30,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Orange-co, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Orlando, Florida
December 4, 1997


                                       -50-
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Andy Moring, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|Date: August 1, 2008 | /s/ ANDY MORING
                     Andy MoringExecutive Vice President — Finance and Chief
                   Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
.i^j^ciBrjza^ doo^r c>f &99&iuu4> Tkng-t? C>^^v^cx 6pT©<P^

f?P. gxsx tZg-4"7



### ^

#"N .Austin!.,..T^. /7©*1ii 

### "T£pA*LCouru-r Cj\<?<£ M<? : _p.•1•> p£.-i^"^cfHofciM/iysXzflJS NJSTOgyf)imcgtt0^



### fl-^Afre: -£g»p w^ej^^-i ^ ^^rj:_ caio Rgpw flg£ogC>*t^<£>W At^P -^opgy^ocy T\»v>eL.v.

5"-rv-^ uv<rwjst T**e_&y$x> o^ < r,_.for. the ^o^nst. th^ 

### AL-^ it i$- m^ onc^evKrAiUDfvo^ o^oga. Apo-, LOST

### .!Tev_, CpQs Cgirvv.. Pe.cc.v Ei&>H-7*b (DF- g7fcg toci^tg/7, x:
|1S y&ju-> C^F *^M£> 16 PP^l^LE^ A.r^C? 3_7 |0©§T? TO ^\Jfe'_ Wirv A^lr^r £><?- g^rotlH UiA&£A>lT ££#. A£pg:A&A^<C PyEft^EL. kOO^Jf jv\i2 ^>o "IPWvT ;r ^v^ 6x£T- T^uec? A6 ^ocnT A.-b /pv TfrA^K ^DQ fbP-. Voya A^l^TyU43g Al^K7 Gp^iQgg^T7flhS- ^CCTpjlIV' 04A*nJ§3 A. WA/U-CU;=F a&- ~l&x?to \c\-7 <g> 5^ o

feWf^O \jKiiT <S-*l£- lO 

## Hv.i_______\u-e,,. ~H 1_a3XOa) in .1.-:, •\l .i:.-. ••..I iC



### K r t e 

## ** 

# 15 *4' : ^
» -4 > 

### 3 •3 

### 3 

## ?3 V* ^ 0<v 

### %

•s?
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of AMREP  Corporation  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned
does hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter M. Pizza
--------------------
Peter M. Pizza*
Date: July 23, 2004

/s/ James Wall
--------------------
James Wall*
Date: July 23, 2004

/s/ Michael P. Duloc
--------------------
Michael P. Duloc*
Date: July 23, 2004









-----------------------
*The Company is a holding company which does  substantially  all of its business
through  two  wholly-owned   subsidiaries   (and  their   subsidiaries).   Those
wholly-owned  subsidiaries  are AMREP  Southwest  Inc.  ("ASW")  and Kable  News
Company, Inc. ("Kable"). Mr. Wall is the principal executive officer of ASW, and
Mr. Duloc is the principal  executive officer of Kable. The Company has no chief
executive  officer and its only executive  officers are James Wall,  Senior Vice
President,  Peter M. Pizza,  Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
Michael  P.  Duloc,  who may be deemed  an  executive  officer  by reason of his
position with Kable.
Order entered April 3, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00844 - CV ABBAS ZAHRAEI, Appellant

V. MOHAMMAD - REZA KHOSH - SIRAT, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429 - 05451 - 2016



### O RDER Appellee’s motion for leave to file a sur - reply is GRANTED . Appellee’s sur

- reply is due on April 8 , 2019.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02569]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

DATE AND TIME:  Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE:  1335 East West Highway (First Floor Conference Room), Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.

STATUS:  This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair
Accreditation Decision for Pro V&V
Briefing and Discussion of Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG 
1.1)
Briefing and Discussion of Program Manuals
Discussion and Consideration of Roles and Responsibilities Document

AGENDA: Commissioners will meet to select a chair and vice-chair and to 
discuss the following items: Accreditation Decision for Pro V&V; 
Briefing and Discussion of Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG 
1.1); Briefing and Discussion of Program Manuals; and Discussion and 
Consideration of Roles and Responsibilities Document.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Members of the public who wish to speak at the meeting 
on proposed changes to the Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines VVSG 1.1 
may send a request to participate to the EAC no later than 5:00 p.m. 
EDT on Thursday, February 12, 2015. Due to time constraints, the EAC 
will select no more than 7 participants to speak. Each of those 
selected will be allotted 5 minutes. Participants will be selected on a 
first-come, first-served basis. However, to maximize diversity of 
input, only one participant per organization or entity will be chosen, 
if necessary. Participants will receive confirmation by 12:00 p.m. EDT 
on Thursday, February 13, 2015. Requests to speak may be sent to the 
EAC via email at testimony@eac.gov, via standard mail addressed to the 
U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1335 East West Highway, Suite 
4300, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or by fax at 301-734-3108. All requests 
must include a description of the topic to be discussed, contact 
information that will be used to notify the requestor with status of 
request (phone number or email); include on the subject/attention line 
or on the outside of the envelope if by standard mail: EAC Public 
Meeting.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (301) 
563-3961.

    Submitted: February 4, 2015.
Signed: Bryan Whitener,
Director of Communications & Clearinghouse.
[FR Doc. 2015-02569 Filed 2-4-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                   Exhibit 10.18


    SUMMARY OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Named Executive Officer                  Annual Base Salary Effective           Cash Bonus Award Payable For 2004
                                         April 1, 2005 Service

<S>                                      <C>                                    <C>
Thomas B. Crowley, Jr.                   $817,680                               $610,685
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer


William A. Pennella                      $420,000                               $120,000
Vice Chairman of the Board and
Executive Vice President

William P. Verdon                        $297,000                               $60,000
Senior Vice President
and General Counsel

Albert M. Marucco                        $246,960(1)                            $27,000
Vice President and
Treasurer

Richard L. Swinton                       $192,300                               $23,925
Vice President, Tax &
Audit(2)
</TABLE>

Description of Compensatory Arrangements As to Directors
--------------------------------------------------------

Effective May 1, 2005, each member of the Board of Directors of the Company who
is not an employee of the Company will be entitled to: (a) an annual retainer of
$40,000; (b) a fee of $900 for each Board of Directors' meeting attended in
person; (c) a fee of $650 for each Board of Directors' meeting attended by
conference call; and (d) a fee of $1,500 for each Board of Directors' committee
meeting attended in person or by conference call. The Company also reimburses
each member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of the Company for
expenses reasonably incurred in attending in person a Board of Directors'
meeting or a Board of Directors' committee meeting.

Directors who are also officers or employees of the Company do not receive any
fees or compensation for service on the Board of Directors or of any committee
thereof

--------------
(1) Mr. Marucco also is entitled to receive in September 2005 a $7,400 lump sum
merit payment.
(2) On January 7, 2005, Richard L. Swinton ceased to perform the functions of
the Company's principal financial officer and principal accounting officer and,
as a result, ceased serving as an executive officer of the Company. However, Mr.
Swinton continues to serve as the Company's Vice President of Tax and Audit.
No. 86-5998.

#### Skozen *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### W. T. Doster, plaintiff in error, *vs.*J. Conklin Brown, defendant in error. W. T. Doster, plaintiff in error, *vs.*J. B. Y. Warner, defendant in error.

1. When a jury brought in a verdict “ for the plaintiff,” it was not error in the judge to ask them how much they intended to find, and on the foreman stating the amount (which was the amount claimed) to direct the verdict to be so amended and then read and received as the verdict.

2. When a defendant had pleaded the general issue, as well as a set-off, a general verdict of the jury “for the defendant” is not improper.

■3. The verdicts in these cases are not contrary to evidence.

Practice in the Superior Court. Verdict. Pleadings. Set-off. New trial. Before Judge Bartlett. Greene Superior Court. March Term, 1874.

The two cases above stated were tried together in the superior court. In the first, the jury found a verdict “for the plaintiff.” The court instructed them to return to their room .and to find a definite sum. The foreman stated that they intended *to*find the amount claimed, to-wit: $58 79. The court inquired if they meant that by their verdict. The jury assented. The court then instructed plaintiff’s counsel to insert that amount in the presence of the defendant’s counsel and of the jury. To which defendant excepted.

In the second case, the defendant pleaded the general issue and set-off. The jury found for the defendant. Whereupon W. T. Doster, the defendant in the first case and the plaintiff in the second, moved for a new trial in the first case, because of alleged error in the court in directing said verdict to be amended; in the second, because said verdict expressed no amount; and in both eases, because the verdicts were contrary to the law and the evidence. There was testimony to sustain the verdicts. The motions were overruled, and movant excepted.

E. C. Kinnebrew, for plaintiff in error.

*544P. B. Robinson; W. H. Branch; M. W. Lewis & Son, for defendants.

McCay, Judge.

1, 2. We see no objection to the course pursued by the judge in correcting the verdict. In effect, it was the same thing as though the amount was written by the foreman’s own hand. It was done in the presence of the jury and by their direction. We have all of us seen the same thing done often, and have never heard it objected to before. The verdict in the other case was for the defendant, and needed no correction. It was found that nothing was due from the defendant to the plaintiff, according to evidence under the pleadings.

3. Nor do we think the verdict contrary to the evidence. There is the positive proof of the plaintiff on one side and really no very definite proof on the other. That there is not so much lumber in the house is not conclusive, as it might have been stolen. Again, it seems difficult to understand how the expert could tell the quality of any of the lumber, such as the sleepers, joists, scantling, etc., as they could not be got at to inspect, and he would have to depend on others for the size and number. We suspect the jury did not have as high an opinion of his skill as a calculator as he has himself.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.