T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN NA M. B UE NR OS T R O, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 56620 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 6 - c v - 0 6 8 1 4 - SJ O - SH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , a n d T H O M A S , C ir c u it J u d g e s . A nn a M . B uenrostro appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary j udgm e nti n f

a vorof he re m pl oy e ri n he ra c t i on a l l e gi ng di s c r i m i na t i on a nd h a r a s s m e n t in v io la tio n o f T itle V I I . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, V

asqu ezv. 

# FI LED JAN 07 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 56620 2 Cnt y. of L os A ng eles , 349 F . 3d 634, 639 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd f orabus e of d is c r e tio n its d e n ia l o f

ar e q u e s t to r e o p e n d is c o v e ry , P a n a tro n i c U S A v. A T&T C or p. , 2 8 7 F. 3 d 8 4 0 , 8 4 6 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton the di s c r i m i na t i on cl ai m because B uenrostro fa i l ed t o sho w thatshe w as tre at ed l es s f avorabl y than sim il ar ly-s itu ated em p lo ye es o u tsid e h erp ro tected clas s o r th at h erem p lo ye r’s proffe re d n on di sc ri m i nat ory r ea sons for i t s a ct i on s, such as denyi ng her a p r o m o tio n , w e r e p r e te x tu a l. See L eongv. P ot ter , 34 7 F . 3d 11 17 , 11 24 (9th C i r. 2003) . S i m i l a r l y , the di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton the h a r a s s m e n t c la im b e c au s e B u e n r o s tr o f a ile d to s h o w th a t s h e w a s s u b je c te d to c o n d u c t s e v e r e o rp e rv a s iv e e n o u g h to c r e a te ah o s tile w o rke n v ir o n m e n t. See V asqu ez , 349 F . 3d a t642- 44. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng B ue nr os tr o’ s s e c ond re qu es tfor a dd i t i on al di sc ov ery und erF eder alR ul e of C i vi l P roce du re 56 (f ) because s he fa i l ed t o sho w thatshe di l i gent l y pursued her previ ou s di sc ov ery op po rtun i t i es and h ow al l ow i ng addi t i on al di sc ov ery w ou l d h ave prec l ud ed s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t. Se e P anatr oni c U SA , 2 8 7 F .3 d a t 8 4 6 .08- 56620 3 W e do notc ons i de rB ue nr os tr o’ s c ont e nt i ons r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on ap p e a l. Se e T

r av e le rs P r op. Cas . C o. of A m . v . C onoc oP hi l l i

ps C o. , 546 F . 3d 11 42 , 11 46 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). B uenrostro’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .