## _GEt~E-

**~** 

## _...,_-------P-AR_T_I_C_UL_A_T_I< 

# Re_r_s-_\t Dcrte : c,;;: f.] [

... 

## '1 

# 'Se('t

-C \ SULFURDIOXIDE, NITROGEN (
-1

## ,.,,--t 

# DiD. n r -: :

**~** __, -I I I I ! L-C ;.r_ J / 

# 'S • 

## CONDUCTED ON THE


## TUNNEL KILN#38


# IN LOIDSVILLE, KENTUCKY
FOR GENERALSHALEPRODUCTSCORPORATION
ON SE;PTEMBER 21, 2001

APPROVED BY

# __L...n_r

# {u-+!VTommy Lotz, Jr Director, Field services \/



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# ,

Chapter 

### I II

Ill 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction and Process Description Test Results Page 

### 1 Summary ofTest Results
......................... 2 Tables 1 Summarized Results

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Graphs 1 Particulate 

### &HF Emissions
.................. 5 2 Sulfur Dioxide Results
...................... 6 3 Nitrogen Oxide Results
...................... 7 Particulate Input Parameters and Results
............ 8 S02 

### Input Parameters and Complete Results

. . . . . . . . . 12 NO. Input Parameters and Complete Results

......... 22 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
................. 32 Figures 1 Stack Breeching Diagram and Sample Point Location
...................... 44 2 Orsat Sampling Train
.......................... 45 3 Method 26A Sampling Train (Particulate and HF)

.... 46 3 S02 

### Sampling Train
........................... 47 4 NO. Sampling Train
........................... 48 IV Field Data Nomenclature 

### &Equations Particulate
................. 49 Particulate Hand Calculations
........................ 56 Nomenclature 

### &Equations S02 ••.•.•.....••....•.... 

### 58 Nomenclature 

### &Equations NO.

. ..................... 59 Field Data Sheets
................................. 60 Particulate Analysis
................................ 64 HF Analysis ...................................... 70 Visual Emissions Sheets
............................ 79 S02 

### Instrument Data Sheets
......................... 82 NO. Data Sheets
.................................. 87 Outlet Orsat Analysis
.............................. 92 Fluke Hydra Data Logger Printout
..................... 94


# v Plant Operational Data ..................................... . 104 VI Calibrations 105



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## r 

# I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION

On September 21, 2001 Guardian System Inc., performed a series oftesting for particulate, hydrogenfluoride, nitrogen oxides, sulfurdioxide, and visual emissions on the #38 Tunnel Kiln baghouse exhaust stack for General Shale Products Corporation in Louisville, Kentucky. These tests were conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations expressed in the Code ofFederal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Reference Methods 1-4, 6C, ?E, 9 

### &26a, as amended. Individual bricks are formed and stacked onto kiln cars. Cars are inserted on a regular basis into a long, continuous- fired tunnel kiln. As one car is discharged another is inserted. This provides aconstant moving mass insidethe kiln. Cars are pushed through the kiln at a slow, methodical pace requiring several days for the complete travel. By means ofa coal and natural gasfiring process, heat is increased in each chamber untilthe total firing is complete. As the car continues through the kiln from the main firing chamber, the temperatures are reduced to provide necessary cooling. The exhaustgases passthrough a hydrated lime scrubberand then to a baghouse. Mr. Phil Towles represented General Shale Products Corporation, and is responsible for all production data. Ms. Jeani Bryant, Jefferson County Air Pollution Control District, observed the tests. Mr. Lalan Kirby, Mr. Tommy Lotz, Jr., Mr. David Bailey, and Mr. Terry Gaither ofGuardian Systems, Inc., performed these tests.



### GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc

# II. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

The following is a summary of the test results conducted on the Kiln Baghouse Exhaust Stack on September 21, 2001. For complete information see Table 1.



### KILN EXHAUST STACK EMISSION TESTS Run Number 1 2 3 Average Process Rate, # bricklhr 26,440 26,440 26,440 26,440 Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate, #/hr <0.0014 0.0028 <.0015 <0.0019 Nitrogen Oxides, 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 ppm Sulfur Dioxide,

- 

## -,"i, loe orains per 100 dscf f-4! (VV' 

### n OJ" 

### n& 

## nR n? n4 

# '"'

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### enc 2

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 

### 1 2 3 Date 

### 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 

### 9-21-01

Outlet Time 

### 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Stack Gas Temperature, F 

### 270 269 273 271 Moisture Content, % v/v 

### 11.11 10.39 8.45 9.98 Oxygen Content, % v/v 

### 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 Carbon Dioxide Content, % v/v 

### 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 ,tack Gas Velocity Feet per Second 

### 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 Volumetric Flow Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 

### 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,019 Volumetric Flow Dry Std Cubic Feet per Minute 

### 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,990 Concentration Grains per Actual Cubic Foot 

### 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 

### 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 Allowable Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 

### 19.24 19.24 19.24 19.24 Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 

### 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 Allowable Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 

### 20 20 20 20
Table 1



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMSInc 

### 3

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. ·· Run Number 1 2 3 Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 9-21-01 Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Hydrogen Fluoride Rate, #/hr < 0.0014 0.0028 < 0.0015 < 0.0019 % lsokinetic 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 Allowable

**·~itrogen** Oxides,ppm 300 300 300 300 Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 35.95 33.34 40.62 36.64 Allowable Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 28.63 28.63 28.63 28.63

Table 1- Continued



### Gt IARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 4

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 

# s .••.....••.•. ·.·.**'·*········.•mmn•R~tor•·GeMrai·SMret>toauetico·······.•······.·ti·**

# ·. ···.·.····.•.•.· ·..· ...·.··...·.··.··.·.·.·.· .··.·.·.··•· ...·.·.·.··.···.···•·.·..· ..··.·.·.·.·.·..·.·.·..·.··.······.··.···.·.··..·.·.·..· . rp Run Number 1 

### 2 

### 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247

**~-------------------------------------------------~**

I 

# GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORPORATION #38 Kiln Emissions on September21, 2001

0.7


# ... :::J 0 0.6 :J:



# ... CD 

### c. 0.5 1/) "0 

### c :::J 0.4 0 

## a..

I 0.3 CD 

# - ra :::J 0.2 

### u 

# :e ra 0.1 

## a.. 0 

### 1 2 

### 3 Run Number 

### ] • Particulate 

# D Hydrogen Flouride 

## I Graph 1 Average 0.005

0.004
... :::J 0 :J:



# ... 0.003 

# 8. 1/) "0 

### c 0.002 

# 5 a.. u. 0.001 :J:

0



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 5

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Barometric Pressure, in Hg 29.97 29.97 29.97 29.97 Static Pressure, in H20 -0.24 -0.24 -0.24 -0.240 Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60 MeterVolume, CF 39.624 44.765 41.757 42.049 ..,eter Correction factor, MCF 0.9704 0.9704 0.9704 MeterVolume (Corrected) 38.451 43.440 40.521 40.804 Stack Temperature, F 270 269 273 271 MeterTemperature, F 70 85 85 80 Meter Pressure, in H20 1.313 1.707 1.461 1.494 SqrVelocity Pressure 0.523 0.585 0.545 0.551 Mass of Particulate, mg 7.1 13.3 6.0 8.8 Mass of Hydrogen Fluoride,ug < 30.000 57.000 < 30.000 < 39.000 Ml ofWater Collected 102.2 104.3 77.4 94.6 %Oxygen 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 % Carbon Dioxide 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 8

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computer Input Parameters for General Shale ProductS Corp. Run Number 

### 1 2 3 Average Date 

### 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 

### 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Stack Area, Sq ft 

### 10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 Pilot Correction Factor 

### 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828 Nozzle Diameter, in 

### 0.285 0.285 0.285 0.285 Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 

### 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 Sulfur Dioxide,ppm 

### 308.66 286.27 348.83 314.59 Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 

### 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### •nc 9

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 1. Stack Pressure Inches Hg 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95 Millimeters Hg 760.79 760.79 760.79 760.79 2. Meter Pressure Inches Hg 30.07 30.10 30.08 30.08 Millimeters Hg 763.69 764.43 763.97 764.03 .l. MeterVolume Dry Std Cubic Feet 38.494 42.332 39.464 40.096 Dry Std Cubic Meters 1.090 1.199 1.118 1.136 4. WaterVolume Std Cubic Feet 4.811 4.909 3.643 4.454 Std Cubic Meters 0.136 0.139 0.103 0.126 5. Moisture Content, % 11.11 10.39 8.45 9.98 6. Molecular Weight Dry 29.22 29.22 29.26 29.23 7. Molecular Weight Wet 27.97 28.06 28.30 28.11 8. Stack Velocity Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 Meters per Second 10.53 11.76 10.93 11.07 9. Volumetric Flow Actual Cubic Ft per minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,019 Actual Cubic M per second 10.33 11.53 10.73 10.86



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 10

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 10. Volumetric Flow Dry Std Cubic Ft per minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,990 Dry Std Cubic M per second 6.65 7.49 7.08 7.08 11. Concentration Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft 0.0028 0.0048 0.0023 0.0033 Grams per Dry Std Cubic M 0.0065 0.0111 0.0053 0.0076 

## 11a. Concentration Hydrogen Fluoride Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft < 1.20E-005 2.07E-005 < 1.17E-005 < 1.48E-005 Grams per Dry Std Cubic M ,...----.....,, < 2.75E-005 4.75E-005 < 2.68E-005 < 3.39E-005 12a. S02 Concentration \; 1,,1'•,,. '<. I Pounds per Dry Std Cubic Ft 5.14E-005 4.76E-005 5.80E-005 5.23E-005 I 15. Particulate Mass Rate Pounds per Hour, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 15a. Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate Pounds per Hour, #/hr < 0.0014 0.0028 < 0.0015 < 0.0019 16. Volume at Nozzle Actual Cubic Feet 59.811 65.159 59.782 61.584 Actual Cubic Meters 1.694 1.845 1.693 1.744 17. Concentration Grains per Actual Cubic Ft 0.0018 0.0031 0.0015 0.0022 Grams perActual Cubic M 0.0042 0.0072 0.0035 0.0050 18. lsokinetic, % 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32



### GUARDIAN sYSTEMS 1nc I I

# II. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

The following is a summary of the test results conducted on the Kiln Baghouse Exhaust Stack on September21, 2001. Forcomplete information see the following tables (Tables 1-2).

KILN EXHAUST STACK EMISSION TESTS



### Run Number 1 Process Rate,# bricklhr 26,440 Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 0.34 Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate, #/hr <1.45 Nitrogen Oxides, 44.86 ppm Sulfur Dioxide, 35.95 grains per 100 dscf % 114 

### 2 26,440

0.66 2.82 44.83 33.34

11R

' I c;.**~/' ~** 



### 2 3 Average 26,440 26,440

0.30 0.43 <1.51 1.44 44.67 44.79 40.62 36.64

11?



### GUARDIAN BVSTEIVIS1nc

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 9-21-01 Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Stack Gas Temperature. F 270 269 273 271 Moisture Content, % v/v 11.11 10.39 845 10.00 Oxygen Content, % v/v 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 Carbon Dioxide Content, % v/v 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67 Stack Gas Velocity Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 Volumetric Flow Actual Cubic Feet per Minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,020 Volumetric Flow Dry Std Cubic Feet per Minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,988 Concentration Grains perActual Cubic Foot 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 Particulate Mass Rate, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 Allowable Particulate Mass Rate. #/hr 19.24 19.24 19.24 19.24 Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0.4 0.6 0.2 Allowable Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 20 20 20
Table 1

3 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Summarized Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 9-21-01 Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Hydrogen Fluoride Rate, #/hr ,£ 1.45 2.82 < 1.51 1.44 % lsokinetic 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32 Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 Allowable Nitrogen Oxides,ppm 300 300 300 300 Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 35.95 33.34 40.62 36.64 Allowable Sulfur Dioxide, grains per 100 dscf 28.63 28.63 28.63 28.63

Table 1· Continued



### 4 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS IMC

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38

Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247



## I

# GENERAL SHALE PRODUCTS CORP. i #38 Kiln Emissions on September21, 2001



## ~3~~~~~~~~~~ :::::1 0 2.5 

### I

**~** 2 Q) 0. 1.5 

## rn "0 1 

### c: :::::1 0 0.5 

## a. 0 1.45 1.51 1.44
0.66 0.43

2 3 Average 

## Run Number

1 • 

## Particulate 

# D Hydrogen Fluoride I

Graph 1

5 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### •nc500.0400.0<:300.0>:2:a..a..200.0100.000.,Ei=GENERALSHALE#38KILNEXHAUSTS02EmissionsonSeptember21,2001••'Time(120readings-30secondsapart)I•Run#1•Run#2•Run#3Izc!'055.0 50.0 45.0 > > **~** 40.0 a.. a.. 35.0 30.0

I I 25.0 GENERAL SHALE #38 KILN EXHAUST • • •yII II II II II Ill

I .. E i= .. 1ii 0

• • NOx Emissions
on September 21, 2001 ... Time (120 readings-
30 seconds apart) • Run #1

• Run #2

• Run #3

I **11111111111111111111111.~-----"**

**~** 2 c( **~** ,.._

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 9-21-01 Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Barometric Pressure. in Hg 29.97 29.97 29.97 29.97 Static Pressure. in H20 -0.24 -0.24 -0.24 -0.240 Run Time. minutes 60 60 60 60 Meter Volume, CF 39.624 44.765 41.757 42.049 Meter Correction factor, MCF 0.9704 0.9704 0.9704 MeterVolume (Corrected) 38.451 43.440 40.521 40.804 Stack Temperature, F 270 269 273 271 MeterTemperature, F 70 85 85 80 Meter Pressure, in H20 1.313 1.707 1.461 1.494 SqrVelocity Pressure 0.523 0.585 0.545 0.551 Mass of Particulate. mg 7.1 13.3 6.0 8.8 Mass of Hydrogen Fluoride, mg < 30.000 57.000 < 30.000 29.250 Ml ofWater Collected 102.2 104.3 77.4 94.6 %Oxygen 16.00 16.20 16.20 16.13 % Carbon Dioxide 3.60 3.60 3.80 3.67



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 8

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computer Input Parameters for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Average 9-21-01 Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 Stack Area, Sq ft 10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 Pilot Correction Factor 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828 Nozzle Diameter, in 0.285 0.285 0.285 0.285 Nitrogen Oxides, ppm 44.86 44.83 44.67 44.79 Sulfur Dioxide,ppm 308.66 286.27 348.83 314.59 Visible Emissions, Highest SMA 0 1 0



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 9

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 1. Stack Pressure Inches Hg 29.95 29.95 29.95 29.95 Millimeters Hg 760.79 760.79 760.79 760.79 2. Meter Pressure Inches Hg 30.07 30.10 30.08 30.08 Millimeters Hg 763.69 764.43 763.97 764.03 3. Meter Volume Dry Std Cubic Feet 38.494 42.332 39.464 40.110 Dry Std Cubic Meters 1.090 1.199 1.118 1.136 4. WaterVolume Std Cubic Feet 4.811 4.909 3.643 4.454 Std Cubic Meters 0.136 0.139 0.103 0.126 5. Moisture Content, % 11.11 10.39 8.45 10.00 6. Molecular Weight Dry 29.22 29.22 29.26 29.23 7. MolecularWeight Wet 27.97 28.06 28.30 28.11 8. Stack Velocity Feet per Second 34.56 38.57 35.87 36.33 Meters per Second 10.53 11.76 10.93 11.07 9. Volumetric Flow Actual Cubic Ft per minute 21,894 24,435 22,727 23,020 Actual Cubic M per second 10.33 11.53 10.73 10.87



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 10

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 , 800-738-5719

Tunnel Kiln 38 Computed Results for General Shale Products Corp. Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 9-21-01 Location Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Time 0844-0948 1016-1118 1145-1247 0844-1247 10. Volumetric Flow Dry Std Cubic Ft per minute 14,092 15,876 15,003 14,988 Dry Std Cubic M per second 6.65 7.49 7.08 7.07 11. Concentration Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft 0.0028 0.0048 0.0023 0.0034 Grams per Dry Std Cubic M 0.0065 0.0111 0.0053 0.0077 11a. Concentration Hydrogen Fluoride Grains per Dry Std Cubic Ft < 0.0120 0.0207 < 0.0117 0.0112 Grams per Dry Std Cubic M < 0.0275 0.0475 < 0.0268 0.0257 12a. S02 Concentration Pounds per Dry Std Cubic Ft 5.14E-005 4.76E-005 5.80E-005 5.23E-005 15. Particulate Mass Rate Pounds per Hour, #/hr 0.34 0.66 0.30 0.43 15a. Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Rate Pounds per Hour, #/hr < 1.45 2.82 < 1.51 1.44 16. Volume at Nozzle Actual Cubic Feet 59.811 65.159 59.782 61.608 Actual Cubic Meters 1.694 1.845 1.693 1.745 17. Concentration Grains per Actual Cubic Ft 0.0018 0.0031 0.0015 0.0022 Grams per Actual Cubic M 0.0042 0.0072 0.0035 0.0050 18. lsokinetic, % 108.52 105.93 104.50 106.32



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc II

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190

Level 

### Mid High

Cylinder Value 1212m 0.00 249.40 452.00 Vendor 

# soc
soc

------- 

## LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 502 Instrument setup for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01 Protocol Gas Identification

·----------- ------ ------- Certified Cone. Carrier Container Cylinder PPM Gas**~e** ID#

---- 249.4 Nitrogen Alu-minum CC18510
452.0 Nitrogen Aluminum CC29440

Response Time Determinations ( based on 95% of span change in instrument reading )

Gas Cone 0 to 452 452 to 0

2 times response 

### =Avg time Time, sec 124 132 128.00 sec 256.00 sec Analyzer Calibration Data Analyzer Calibration Value pj:)l11__ 7.70 252.80 451.20 Absolute Difference 7.70 3.40 Date of EXJ2iration

1-3-03
8-15-02

Analyzer Calibration

Error,%_

----------------- ---------**------cc-co::.:.~8** 

### o=--o-
_ _ _____ 1.54% 0.68% 0.16% 2.00% Span (ppm) 500 Allowable Value



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 12

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190

Reading 1 

### 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 

### 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 

## LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run 1 Data Logger Reading for#38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01
Date Time 09/21/01 08:46:34 09/21/01 08:47:04 09/21/01 08:47:34 09/21/01 08:48:04 09/21/01 08:48:35 09/21/01 08:49:04 09/21/01 08:49:34 09/21/01 08:50:04 09/21/01 08:50:34 09/21/01 08:51:04 09/21/01 08:51:34 09/21/01 08:52:04 09/21/01 08:52:34 09/21/01 08:53:04 09/21/01 08:53:34 09/21/01 08:54:05 09/21/01 08:54:34 09/21/01 08:55:04 09/21/01 08:55:34 09/21/01 08:56:04 09/21/01 08:56:34 09/21/01 08:57:04 09/21/01 08:57:34 09/21/01 08:58:05 09/21/01 08:58:34 09/21/01 08:59:04 09/21/01 08:59:34 09/21/01 09:00:04 09/21/01 09:00:34 09/21/01 09:01:04 09/21/01 09:01:34 09/21/01 09:02:05 09/21/01 09:02:34 09/21/01 09:03:04 09/21/01 09:03:35 09/21/01 09:04:04 09/21/01 09:04:34 09/21/01 09:05:04 Uncorrected PPMS02 329.09 329.74

331.9 339.45 345.28 342.48 297.14 251.15

239.6 235.5 235.82 244.16

250.4 249.21 250.72 256.87 301.35 313.87 295.41

289.8 275.66

288.5 301.02 298.11 289.26 290.99

295.2 297.79 296.06 300.16 303.51 314.52 316.57 313.26 310.09 311.53 316.79 319.27

13 Corrected PPM S02 335.47 336.15 338.41 346.32 352.42 349.49 302.02 253.87 241.78 237.49 237.82 246.56 253.09 251.84 253.42 259.86 306.43 319.54 300.21 294.34 279.53 292.98 306.08 303.04 293.77 295.58 299.99 302.70 300.89 305.18 308.69 320.22 322.36 318.90 315.58 317.09 322.59 325.19


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc39 09/21/01 09:05:34 322.07 328.12 40 09/21/01 09:06:05 325.42 331.63 41 09/21/01 09:06:34 334.38 341.01 42 09/21/01 09:07:04 346.79 354.00 43 09/21/01 09:07:35 346.15 353.33 44 09/21/01 09:08:05 346.15 353.33 45 09/21/01 09:08:35 342.58 349.59 46 09/21/01 09:09:05 342.04 349.03 47 09/21/01 09:09:35 347.66 354.91 48 09/21/01 09:10:05 347.23 354.46 49 09/21/01 09:10:35 332.98 339.54 50 09/21/01 09:11:05 317.54 323.38 51 09/21/01 09:11:35 317.76 323.61 52 09/21/01 09:12:05 319.7 325.64 53 09/21/01 09:12:35 319.38 325.30 54 09/21/01 09:13:05 312.14 317.72 55 09/21/01 09:13:35 313.76 319.42 56 09/21/01 09:14:05 322.51 328.58 57 09/21/01 09:14:35 318.3 324.17 58 09/21/01 09:15:05 317.22 323.04 59 09/21/01 09:15:35 311.71 317.27 60 09/21/01 09:16:05 318.87 324.77 61 09/21/01 09:16:35 241.55 243.82 62 09/21/01 09:17:05 117.94 114.42 63 09/21/01 09:17:35 69.517 63.72 64 09/21/01 09:18:05 52.091 45.48 65 09/21/01 09:18:35 44.22 37.24 66 09/21/01 09:19:05 150.07 148.05 67 09/21/01 09:19:35 248.99 251.61 68 09/21/01 09:20:05 285.59 289.93 69 09/21/01 09:20:35 298.33 303.27 70 09/21/01 09:21:05 313.9 319.57 71 09/21/01 09:21:35 315.17 320.90 72 09/21/01 09:22:05 314.95 320.67 73 09/21/01 09:22:35 314.3 319.99 74 09/21/01 09:23:05 323.26 329.37 75 09/21/01 09:23:35 328.12 334.45 76 09/21/01 09:24:05 324.99 331.18 77 09/21/01 09:24:35 311.6 317.16 78 09/21/01 09:25:05 312.36 317.95 79 09/21/01 09:25:35 319.92 325.87 80 09/21/01 09:26:05 324.56 330.73 81 09/21/01 09:26:35 327.58 333.89 82 09/21/01 09:27:05 332.44 338.98 83 09/21/01 09:27:35 341.07 348.01 84 09/21/01 09:28:05 351.11 358.52 85 09/21/01 09:28:35 352.84 360.33 86 09/21/01 09:29:05 352.95 360.45 87 09/21/01 09:29:35 347.98 355.25 88 09/21/01 09:30:05 351.44 358.87 89 09/21/01 09:30:35 357.91 365.64 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 1490 09/21/01 09:31:05 356.73 364.41 91 09/21/01 09:31:35 345.39 352.53 92 09/21/01 09:32:05 325.85 332.08 93 09/21/01 09:32:35 325.85 332.08 94 09/21/01 09:33:05 328.55 334.90 95 09/21/01 09:33:35 324.45 330.61 96 09/21/01 09:34:05 314.41 320.10 97 09/21/01 09:34:35 307.29 312.65 98 09/21/01 09:35:05 316.39 322.17 99 09/21/01 09:35:35 321.64 327.67 100 09/21/01 09:36:05 322.43 328.50 101 09/21/01 09:36:35 320.78 326.77 102 09/21/01 09:37:05 324.56 330.73 103 09/21/01 09:37:35 319.05 324.96 104 09/21/01 09:38:05 316.25 322.03 105 09/21/01 09:38:35 313.65 319.31 106 09/21/01 09:39:05 311.71 317.27 107 09/21/01 09:39:35 313.58 319.23 108 09/21/01 09:40:05 317.54 323.38 109 09/21/01 09:40:35 312.04 317.62 110 09/21/01 09:41:05 310.74 316.26 111 09/21/01 09:41:35 308.58 314.00 112 09/21/01 09:42:05 313.33 318.97 113 09/21/01 09:42:35 314.73 320.44 114 09/21/01 09:43:05 311.93 317.50 115 09/21/01 09:43:35 309.66 315.13 116 09/21/01 09:44:05 314.52 320.22 117 09/21/01 09:44:35 320.27 326.24 118 09/21/01 09:45:05 324.45 330.61 119 09/21/01 09:45:35 319.27 325.19 120 09/21/01 09:46:05 316.25 322.03 Avera9e 303.48 308.66 System Calibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Value Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 7.70 7.60 9.70 -0.02% 0.40% 0.42% 451.20 440.30 440.50 -2.18% -2.14% 0.04% Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 308.66

15 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run2 Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01 Uncorrected Corrected Reading Date Time PPMS02 PPMS02 1 09/21/0110:18:31 263.6 265.08 2 09/21/01 10:19:01 262.49 263.92 3 09/21/01 10:19:31 249.97 250.85 4 09/21/01 10:20:01 245.97 246.67 5 09/21/01 10:20:31 252.99 254.00 6 09/21/01 10:21:01 259.68 260.99 7 09/21/01 10:21:31 256.77 257.95 8 09/21/01 10:22:01 252.37 253.35 9 09/21/0110:22:31 253.1 254.12 10 09/21/01 10:23:01 263.06 264.52 11 09/21/01 10:23:31 268.35 270.04 12 09/21/0110:24:01 268.1 269.78 13 09/21/01 10:24:31 264.86 266.40 14 09/21/01 10:25:01 267.99 269.66 15 09/21/01 10:25:31 267.88 269.55 16 09/21/01 10:26:01 264.65 266.18 17 09/21/01 10:26:31 260.22 261.55 18 09/21/01 10:27:01 260.22 261.55 19 09/21/0110:27:31 264.54 266.06 20 09/21/01 10:28:01 273.28 275.19 21 09/21/01 10:28:31 277.71 279.81 22 09/21/0110:29:01 280.73 282.97 23 09/21/01 10:29:31 279.22 281.39 24 09/21/01 10:30:01 282.24 284.55 25 09/21/01 10:30:31 285.8 288.26 26 09/21/01 10:31:01 286.24 288.72 27 09/21/0110:31:31 287.1 289.62 28 09/21/01 10:32:01 293.36 296.16 29 09/21/01 10:32:31 299.87 302.96 30 09/21/01 10:33:01 300.05 303.14 31 09/21/01 10:33:31 298.54 301.57 32 09/21/01 10:34:01 298.54 301.57 33 09/21/01 10:34:31 301.24 304.39 34 09/21/01 10:35:01 304.48 307.77 35 09/21/0110:35:31 292.5 295.26 36 09/21/01 10:36:01 269.83 271.59 37 09/21/01 10:36:31 257.09 258.28 38 09/21/01 10:37:01 264.43 265.95


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS•nc 1639 09/21/01 10:37:31 267.48 269.13 40 09/21/01 10:38:01 264.43 265.95 41 09/21/01 10:38:31 265.29 266.85 42 09/21/01 10:39:01 263.46 264.93 43 09/21/01 10:39:31 268.64 270.34 44 09/21/01 10:40:01 267.35 269.00 45 09/21/01 10:40:31 264.97 266.51 46 09/21/01 10:41:01 267.78 269.45 47 09/21/01 10:41:31 269.83 271.59 48 09/21/01 10:42:01 277.06 279.14 49 09/21/01 10:42:31 272.96 274.85 50 09/21/01 10:43:01 270.61 272.40 51 09/21/01 10:43:31 267.24 268.88 52 09/21/01 10:44:01 272.09 273.95 53 09/21/01 10:44:31 274.36 276.32 54 09/21/01 10:45:01 258.93 260.20 55 09/21/01 10:45:31 260.33 261.67 56 09/21/01 10:46:01 270.58 272.37 57 09/21/01 10:46:31 272.23 274.09 58 09/21/01 10:47:01 270.26 272.04 59 09/21/01 10:47:31 266.91 268.54 60 09/21/01 10:48:01 258.82 260.09 61 09/21/01 10:48:31 261.95 263.36 62 09/21/01 10:49:01 274.36 276.32 63 09/21/01 10:49:31 274.47 276.43 64 09/21/01 10:50:01 276.09 278.12 65 09/21/01 10:50:31 274.36 276.32 66 09/21/01 10:51:01 284.94 287.36 67 09/21/01 10:51:31 293.04 295.82 68 09/21/01 10:52:01 293.14 295.93 69 09/21/01 10:52:31 288.97 291.57 70 09/21/01 10:53:01 290.12 292.77 71 09/21/01 10:53:31 304.91 308.22 72 09/21/01 10:54:01 313.65 317.35 73 09/21/01 10:54:31 312.58 316.23 74 09/21/01 10:55:01 311.1 314.68 75 09/21/01 10:55:31 308.69 312.17 76 09/21/01 10:56:01 314.09 317.80 77 09/21/01 10:56:31 308.9 312.38 78 09/21/01 10:57:01 296.6 299.54 79 09/21/01 10:57:31 283.54 285.90 80 09/21/01 10:58:01 285.05 287.48 81 09/21/01 10:58:31 285.16 287.59 82 09/21/01 10:59:01 284.94 287.36 83 09/21/01 10:59:31 282 67 284.99 84 09/21/01 11:00:01 279.11 281.28 85 09/21/01 11:00:31 280.08 282.29 86 09/21/01 11:01:01 280.76 283.00 87 09/21/01 11:01:31 280.51 282.74 88 09/21/01 11:02:01 280.84 283.08 89 09/21/01 11:02:31 278.03 280.15 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 1790 09/21/01 11:03:01 288.83 291.43 91 09/21/01 11:03:31 290.55 293.22 92 09/21/01 11:04:01 286.88 289.39 93 09/21/01 11:04:31 285.48 287.93 94 09/21/01 11:05:01 286.56 289.06 95 09/21/01 11:05:31 287.56 290.10 96 09/21/01 11:06:01 291.31 294.02 97 09/21/01 11:06:31 291.42 294.13 98 09/21/01 11:07:01 297.68 300.67 99 09/21/01 11:07:31 304.51 307.80 100 09/21/01 11:08:01 302.75 305.96 101 09/21/01 11:08:31 298.22 301.23 102 09/21/01 11:09:01 295.2 298.08 103 09/21/01 11:09:31 291.96 294.70 104 09/21/0111:10:01 295.41 298.30 105 09/21/01 11:10:31 294.9 297.77 106 09/21/0111:11:01 296.28 299.21 107 09/21/0111:11:31 293.79 296.61 108 09/21/0111:12:01 303.08 306.31 109 09/21/01 11:12:31 306.64 310.02 110 09/21/0111:13:01 305.45 308.78 111 09/21/0111:13:31 300.92 304.05 112 09/21/01 11:14:01 303.08 306.31 113 09/21/01 11:14:31 310.23 313.77 114 09/21/01 11:15:01 322.07 326.14 115 09/21/01 11:15:31 327.58 331.89 116 09/21/0111:16:01 327.51 331.82 117 09/21/01 11:16:31 329.63 334.03 118 09/21/0111:17:01 339.89 344.75 119 09/21/0111:17:31 337.73 342.49 120 09/21/0111:18:01 320.46 324.46
Avera!le 283.89 286.27 System Calibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 7.70 9.70 9.80 0.40% 0.42% 0.02% 451.20 440.50 444.70 -2.14% -1.30% 0.84% Allowable Values 5.00% 500% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 286.27



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMStnc 18

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190

... Reading
____
**~** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 

## LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run 3 Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01
Date Time



### .~o=9~,2-=11o1 11:47:24

09/21/01 11:47:54 og/21/01 11:48:24 og/21/01 11:48:54 09/21/01 11:49:24 09/21/0111:49:54 09/21/0111:50:24 09/21/01 11:50:54 09/21/01 11:51:24 09/21/01 11:51:54 09/21/01 11:52:24 09/21/0111:52:54 09/21/01 11:53:24 09/21/0111:53:54 09/21/01 11:54:24 09/21/01 11:54:54 og/21/01 11:55:24 09/21/01 11:55:54 09/21/01 11:56:24 09/21/01 11:56:54 09/21/01 11:57:24 09/21/01 11:57:54 09/21/01 11:58:24 09/21/01 11 :58:54 09/21/01 11:59:24 09/21/0111:59:54 09/21/01 12:00:24 09/21/01 12:00:54 09/21/01 12:01:24 09/21/01 12:01:54 09/21/01 12:02:24 09/21/01 12:02:54 09/21/01 12:03:24 09/21/01 12:03:54 09/21/01 12:04:24 09/21/01 12:04:54 09/21/01 12:05:24 09/21/01 12:05:54 Uncorrected PPMS02 317.47 313.11 318.44 324.23 324.48 319.48 320.02 333.41 336.76 335.14 335.57 339.24 343.56 345.82 351.11 354.03 359.53 370.43 367.og

364.5 364.93 377.38 378.75 377.56 375.87 369.03 369.36 351.54 338.05

3346 342.26 351.33 348.52 344.42 344.85 348.74 342.91 338.59

19 Corrected PPM S02 320.76 316.21 321.77 327.82 328.08 322.86 323.42 337.40 340.90 339.21 339.66 343.49 348.00 350.36 355.89 358.94 364.68 376.06 372.57 369.87 370.32 383.32 384.75 383.51 381.74 374.60 374.95 356.34 342.25 338.65 346.65 356.12 353.18 348.90 349.35 353.41 347.33 342.81


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc39 09/21/01 12:06:24 336.86 341.01 40 09/21/01 12:06:54 341.22 345.56 41 09/21/01 12:07:24 347.12 351.72 42 09/21/01 12:07:54 347.12 351.72 43 09121/01 12:08:24 341.86 346.23 44 09/21/01 12:08:54 339.02 343.26 45 09/21/01 12:09:24 341.72 346.08 46 09/21/01 12:09:54 342.3 346.69 47 09/21/01 12:10:24 336.47 340.60 48 09/21/01 12:10:54 338.81 343.04 49 09/21/01 12:11:24 338.05 342.25 50 09/21/0112:11:54 348.31 352.96 51 09/21/01 12:12:24 350.9 355.67 52 09/21/01 12:12:54 348.31 352.96 53 09/21/0112:13:24 341.4 345.75 54 09/21/01 12:13:54 342.15 346.53 55 09/21/01 12:14:24 346.9 351.49 56 09/21/01 12:14:54 348.31 352.96 57 09/21/0112:15:24 348.85 353.53 58 09/21/01 12:15:54 350.68 355.44 59 09/21/01 12:16:24 353.92 358.82 60 09/21/01 12:16:54 359.42 364.57 61 09/21/01 12:17:24 361.58 366.82 62 09/21/01 12:17:54 363.42 368.74 63 09/21/01 12:18:24 362.34 367.61 64 09/21/01 12:18:54 373.67 379.45 65 09/21/01 12:19:24 377.24 383.17 66 09/21/01 12:19:54 371.84 377.54 67 09/21/01 12:20:24 367.3 372.79 68 09/21/01 12:20:54 372.05 377.75 69 09/21/01 12:21:24 378.64 384.64 70 09/21/01 12:21:54 366.26 371.71 71 09/21/01 12:22:24 350.07 354.80 72 09/21/01 12:22:54 338.91 343.15 73 09/21/01 12:23:24 335.28 339.36 74 09/21/01 12:23:54 342.37 346.76 75 09/21/01 12:24:24 341.29 345.63 76 09/21/01 12:24:54 340.53 344.84 77 09/21/01 12:25:24 333.98 338.00 78 09/21/01 12:25:54 340.75 345.07 79 09/21/01 12:26:24 332.98 336.96 80 09/21/01 12:26:54 327.04 330.75 81 09/21/01 12:27:24 317.03 320.30 82 09/21/01 12:27:54 319.38 322.75 83 09/21/01 12:28:24 327.9 331.65 84 09/21/01 12:28:54 333.3 337.29 85 09/21/01 12:29:24 333.52 337.52 86 09/21/01 12:29:54 336.68 340.82 87 09/21/01 12:30:24 337.3 341.47 88 09/21/01 12:30:54 342.58 346.98 89 09/21/01 12:31:24 337.3 341.47 

### GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc 

### 2090 09/21/01 12:31:54 334.16 338.19 91 09/21/01 12:32:24 330.49 334.36 92 09/21/01 12:32:54 338.48 342.70 93 09/21/01 12:33:24 343.77 348.22 94 09/21/01 12:33:54 341.5 345.85 95 09/21/01 12:34:24 334.27 338.30 96 09/21/01 12:34:54 332.44 336.39 97 09/21/01 12:35:24 339.45 343.71 98 09/21/01 12:35:54 339.78 344.06 99 09/21/01 12:36:24 336.86 341.01 100 09/21/01 12:36:54 333.3 337.29 101 09/21/01 12:37:24 337.51 341.69 102 09/21/01 12:37:54 345.07 349.58 103 09/21/01 12:38:24 345.39 349.91 104 09/21/01 12:38:54 345.07 349.58 105 09/21/01 12:39:24 346.36 350.93 106 09/21/01 12:39:54 351.44 356.23 107 09/21/01 12:40:24 351.11 355.89 108 09/21/0112:40:54 346.04 350.59 109 09/21/01 12:41:24 346.25 350.81 110 09/21/0112:41:54 347.33 351.94 111 09/21/01 12:42:24 353.49 358.37 112 09/21/01 12:42:54 353.38 358.26 113 09/21/0112:43:24 335.14 339.21 114 09/21/01 12:43:54 329.52 333.34 115 09/21/01 12:44:24 325.35 328.99 116 09/21/01 12:44:54 328.44 332.22 117 09/21/01 12:45:24 328.23 332.00 118 09/21/01 12:45:54 325.53 329.18 119 09/21/01 12:46:24 324.13 327.71 120 09/21/01 12:46:54 328.88 332.67 Averase 344.35 348.83 System Calibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 7.70 9.80 10.80 0.42% 0.62% 0.20% 451.20 444.70 441.60 -1.30% -1.92% -0.62% Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 348.83



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

### 21

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190

Level Vendor Mid 

## soc High 

## sot LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 NOx Instrument setup for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01 Protocol Gas Identification -C"e-rt"ifi",e'dcoC'o-n-'-'c. Carrier

**-'--';C'o-nc:-ta~in-er** PPM Gas TYQE!_ ·248.3 Nitrogen Aluminum Cylinder ID# XC000210B
469.5 Nitrogen Aluminum CC95905
Response Time Determinations ( based on 95% of span change in instrument reading )

Gas Cone 0 to 469.5 469.5 to 0

2 times response =Avg time Time, sec 87 83 85.00 sec 170.00 sec Analyzer Calibration Data Analyzer Date of Expiration 10-17-02
11-29-02

Cylinder Calibration Absolute Analyzer Calibration

**==~~-Error,%_~** •

**X~u~ ppm·==~**  **~=~==· V~a~l;"tJe""c.** 8Pm_

**-~** _ **~-·~-------.** _ _Di=ffe=r=en==c=e= 0.00 248.30 469.50

-------- Span (ppm) 1.70 252.40 471.30 500



### 22 1.70 4.10 1.80

--------- Allowable Value 0.34% 0.82% 0.36% 2.00%



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190

Reading 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 

## LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run 1 Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01
Date Time 09/21/01 08:46:34 09/21/01 08:47:04 09/21/01 08:47:34 09/21/01 08:48:04 09/21/01 08:48:35 09/21/01 08:49:04 09/21/01 08:49:34 09/21/01 08:50:04 09/21/01 08:50:34 09/21/01 08:51:04 09/21/01 08:51:34 09/21/01 08:52:04 09/21/01 08:52:34 09/21/01 08:53:04 09/21/01 08:53:34 09/21/01 08:54:05 09/21/01 08:54:34 09/21/01 08:55:04 09/21/01 08:55:34 09/21/01 08:56:04 09/21/01 08:56:34 09/21/01 08:57:04 09/21/01 08:57:34 09/21/01 08:58:05 09/21/01 08:58:34 09/21/01 08:59:04 09/21/01 08:59:34 09/21/01 09:00:04 09/21/01 09:00:34 09/21/01 09:01:04 09/21/01 09:01 :34 09/21/01 09:02:05 09/21/01 09:02:34 09/21/01 09:03:04 09/21/01 09:03:35 09/21/01 09:04:04 09/21/01 09:04:34 09/21/01 09:05:04 Uncorrected PPM NOx 49.589

51.05 47.006 47.445 49.594 49.685 42.588 35.256 31.991 30.816 30.373 30.863 30.003 30.203 31.186 32.308 36.583 39.518 42.488 44.593 45.876 45.667 46.815 47.898 49.859 49.328 46.384 46.641 48.867 49.293 48.189 45.789 47.737 49.733

50.95 47.911 46.984

49.42



### 23 Corrected PPM NOx 48.30 49.77 45.70 46.14 48.31 48.40 41.24 33.84 30.55 29.37 28.92 29.41 28.55 28.75 29.74 30.87 35.18 38.14 41.14 43.26 44.56 44.34 45.50 46.59 48.57 48.04 45.07 45.33 47.57 48.00 46.89 44.47 46.43 48.45 49.67 46.61 45.67 48.13 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMStnc39 09/21/01 09:05:34 51.694 50.42 40 09/21/01 09:06:05 50.811 49.53 41 09/21/01 09:06:34 47.241 45.93 42 09/21/01 09:07:04 48.359 47.06 43 09/21/01 09:07:35 49.272 47.98 44 09/21/01 09:08:05 50.65 49.37 45 09/21/01 09:08:35 49.437 48.15 46 09/21/01 09:09:05 47.124 45.81 47 09/21/01 09:09:35 48.137 46.84 48 09/21/01 09:10:05 49.759 48.47 49 09/21/01 09:10:35 49.08 47.79 50 09/21/01 09:11:05 46.089 44.77 51 09/21/01 09:11:35 43.545 42.20 52 09/21/01 09:12:05 45.001 43.67 53 09/21/01 09:12:35 46.245 44.93 54 09/21/01 09:13:05 47.371 46.06 55 09/21/01 09:13:35 44.554 43.22 56 09/21/01 09:14:05 43.936 42.60 57 09/21/01 09:14:35 45.806 44.48 58 09/21/01 09:15:05 46.78 45.47 59 09/21/01 09:15:35 47.184 45.87 60 09/21/01 09:16:05 44.58 43.25 61 09/21/01 09:16:35 45.23 43.90 62 09/21/01 09:17:05 43.9555 42.62 63 09/21/01 09:17:35 41.0596 39.70 64 09/21/01 09:18:05 40.28535 38.92 65 09/21/01 09:18:35 35.8515 34.44 66 09/21/01 09:19:05 36.365 34.96 67 09/21/01 09:19:35 44.067 42.73 68 09/21/01 09:20:05 46.663 45.35 69 09/21/01 09:20:35 45.071 43.74 70 09/21/01 09:21:05 44.054 42.72 71 09/21/01 09:21:35 45.115 43.79 72 09/21/01 09:22:05 46.55 45.24 73 09/21/01 09:22:35 46.876 45.56 74 09/21/01 09:23:05 43.397 42.06 75 09/21/01 09:23:35 45.323 44.00 76 09/21/01 09:24:05 46.119 44.80 77 09/21/01 09:24:35 47.876 46.57 78 09/21/01 09:25:05 46.745 45.43 79 09/21/01 09:25:35 44.941 43.61 80 09/21/01 09:26:05 47.032 45.72 81 09/21/01 09:26:35 50.068 48.78 82 09/21/01 09:27:05 50.35 49.07 83 09/21/01 09:27:35 47.754 46.45 84 09/21/01 09:28:05 47.789 46.49 85 09/21/01 09:28:35 49.02 47.73 86 09/21/01 09:29:05 50.894 49.62 87 09/21/01 09:29:35 50.585 49.31 88 09/21/01 09:30:05 47.015 45.70 89 09/21/01 09:30:35 48.124 46.82 

### GUARDIAN SVSTEIVIS1nc 

### 2490 09/21/01 09:31:05 49.65 48.36 91 09/21/01 09:31:35 50.65 49.37 92 09/21/01 09:32:05 49.25 47.96 93 09/21/01 09:32:35 46.493 45.18 94 09/21/01 09:33:05 48.002 46.70 95 09/21/01 09:33:35 49.494 48.20 96 09/21/01 09:34:05 49.672 48.38 97 09/21/01 09:34:35 48.045 46.74 98 09/21/01 09:35:05 46.585 45.27 99 09/21/01 09:35:35 48.241 46.94 100 09/21/01 09:36:05 50.316 49.03 101 09/21/01 09:36:35 50.946 49.67 102 09/21/01 09:37:05 47.967 46.66 103 09/21/01 09:37:35 48.141 46.84 104 09/21/01 09:38:05 49.567 48.28 105 09/21/01 09:38:35 49.528 48.24 106 09/21/01 09:39:05 49.228 47.94 107 09/21/01 09:39:35 46.733 45.42 108 09/21/01 09:40:05 48.606 47.31 109 09/21/01 09:40:35 49.937 48.65 110 09/21/01 09:41 :05 50.576 49.30 111 09/21/01 09:41:35 49.641 48.35 112 09/21/01 09:42:05 48.302 47.00 113 09/21/01 09:42:35 49.25 47.96 114 09/21/01 09:43:05 50.95 49.67 115 09/21/01 09:43:35 50.907 49.63 116 09/21/01 09:44:05 48.563 47.27 117 09/21/01 09:44:35 49.646 48.36 118 09/21/01 09:45:05 50.202 48.92 119 09/21/01 09:45:35 51.385 50.11 120 09/21/01 09:46:05 51.868 50.60 Averalle 46.18 44.86 SystemCalibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Value Initial

. Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error, % 1.70 2.40 1.00 0.14% -0.14% -0.28% 471.30 471.60 462.80 0.06% -1.70% -1.76% Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 44.86



### 25 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED ·P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run2 Data Logger Reading for#38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01 Uncorrected Corrected Reading Date Time PPM NOx PPM NOx 1 09/21/01 10:18:31 42.775 42.14 2 09/21/01 10:19:01 45.006 44.41 3 09/21/01 10:19:31 45.889 45.31 4 09/21/01 10:20:01 47.115 46.56 5 09/21/01 10:20:31 46.419 45.85 6 09/21/0110:21:01 48.063 47.52 7 09/21/0110:21:31 48.885 48.36 8 09/21/01 10:22:01 49.646 49.13 9 09/21/01 10:22:31 47.611 47.06 10 09/21/0110:23:01 47.085 46.53 11 09/21/01 10:23:31 48.646 48.12 12 09/21/01 10:24:01 50.376 49.88 13 09/21/0110:24:31 50.346 49.85 14 09/21/01 10:25:01 47.998 47.46 15 09/21/01 10:25:31 48.028 47.49 16 09/21/01 10:26:01 48.95 48.43 17 09/21/01 10:26:31 48.919 48.39 18 09/21/0110:27:01 48.419 47.88 19 09/21/01 10:27:31 46.815 46.25 20 09/21/0110:28:01 48.428 47.89 21 09/21/01 10:28:31 49.698 49.19 22 09/21/01 10:29:01 48.95 48.43 23 09/21/01 10:29:31 47.998 47.46 24 09/21/01 10:30:01 47.932 47.39 25 09/21/01 10:30:31 49.663 49.15 26 09/21/0110:31:01 49.785 49.27 27 09/21/0110:31:31 49.541 49.03 28 09/21/01 10:32:01 47.754 47.21 29 09/21/01 10:32:31 48.859 48.33 30 09/21/01 10:33:01 49.711 49.20 31 09/21/01 10:33:31 50.189 49.69 32 09/21/01 10:34:01 49.067 48.54 33 09/21/01 10:34:31 46.945 46.39 34 09/21/01 10:35:01 47.35 46.80 35 09/21/01 10:35:31 47.68 47.13 36 09/21/01 10:36:01 46.91 46.35 37 09/21/01 10:36:31 46 071 45.50 38 09/21/01 10:37:01 44.923 44.33


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 2639 09/21/01 10:37:31 45.541 44.96 40 09/21/01 10:38:01 46.293 45.72 41 09/21/01 10:38:31 46.876 46.32 42 09/21/0110:39:01 45.175 44.58 43 09/21/01 10:39:31 44.671 44.07 44 09/21/01 10:40:01 45.219 44.63 45 09/21/01 10:40:31 46.645 46.08 46 09/21/01 10:41:01 46.75 46.19 47 09/21/01 10:41:31 44.614 44.01 48 09/21/01 10:42:01 44.914 44.32 49 09/21/01 10:42:31 46.432 45.86 50 09/21/01 10:43:01 46.772 46.21 51 09/21/01 10:43:31 45.954 45.38 52 09/21/01 10:44:01 43.901 43.29 53 09/21/01 10:44:31 45.11 44.52 54 09/21/01 10:45:01 46.945 46.39 55 09/21/01 10:45:31 48.624 48.09 56 09/21/0110:46:01 46.506 45.94 57 09/21/01 10:46:31 45.397 44.81 58 09/21/01 10:47:01 46.35 45.78 59 09/21/01 10:47:31 46.689 46.12 60 09/21/01 10:48:01 46.728 46.16 61 09/21/01 10:48:31 44.871 44.28 62 09/21/01 10:49:01 45.728 45.15 63 09/21/01 10:49:31 47.493 46.94 64 09/21/01 10:50:01 47.619 47.07 65 09/21/01 10:50:31 47.954 47.41 66 09/21/01 10:51:01 46.223 45.65 67 09/21/01 10:51:31 47.371 46.82 68 09/21/01 10:52:01 49.067 48.54 69 09/21/01 10:52:31 49.381 48.86 70 09/21/01 10:53:01 48.024 47.48 71 09/21/01 10:53:31 47.798 47.25 72 09/21/01 10:54:01 50.054 49.55 73 09/21/01 10:54:31 51.407 50.92 74 09/21/01 10:55:01 51.034 50.55 75 09/21/01 10:55:31 48.137 47.60 76 09/21/01 10:56:01 48.511 47.98 77 09/21/01 10:56:31 49.659 49.15 78 09/21/01 10:57:01 49.646 49.13 79 09/21/01 10:57:31 49.215 48.69 80 09/21/01 10:58:01 47.01 46.45 81 09/21/01 10:58:31 48.554 48.02 82 09/21/01 10:59:01 50.05 49.54 83 09/21/01 10:59:31 50.846 50.35 84 09/21/01 11:00:01 49.285 48.77 85 09/21/01 11:00:31 47.002 46.44 86 09/21/01 11:01:01 49.351 48.83 87 09/21/01 11:01:31 50.011 49.50 88 09/21/01 11:02:01 50.772 50.28 89 09/21/01 11:02:31 48.519 47.99 

### GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc 2790 09/21/01 11:03:01 48.241 47.70 91 09/21/01 11:03:31 50.459 49.96 92 09/21/01 11:04:01 50.955 50.46 93 09/21/01 11:04:31 50.472 49.97 94 09/21/01 11:05:01 47.967 47.43 95 09/21/01 11:05:31 48.459 47.93 96 09/21/01 11:06:01 49.498 48.98 97 09/21/0111:06:31 51.337 50.85 98 09/21/01 11:07:01 50.607 50.11 99 09/21/01 11:07:31 49.781 49.27 100 09/21/01 11:08:01 50.054 49.55 101 09/21/01 11:08:31 51.885 51.41 102 09/21/01 11:09:01 52.485 52.02 103 09/21/0111:09:31 49.376 48.86 104 09/21/01 11:10:01 48.885 48.36 105 09/21/01 11:10:31 50.033 49.53 106 09/21/01 11:11:01 50.95 50.46 107 09/21/0111:11:31 52.12 51.65 108 09/21/0111:12:01 49.146 48.62 109 09/21/01 11:12:31 49.598 49.08 110 09/21/01 11:13:01 51.707 51.23 111 09/21/0111:13:31 52.39 51.92 112 09/21/01 11:14:01 51.955 51.48 113 09/21/01 11:14:31 48.524 47.99 114 09/21/01 11:15:01 49.05 48.53 115 09/21/0111:15:31 50.294 49.79 116 09/21/01 11:16:01 52.017 51.55 117 09/21/0111:16:31 50.25 49.75 118 09/21/0111:17:01 49.063 48.54 119 09/21/01 11:17:31 49.867 49.36 120 09/21/01 11:18:01 48.915 48.39
Avera9e 48.36 47.83 System Calibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error.% Error,% Error,% Error,% 1.70 1.00 1.70 -0.14% 0.00% 0.14% 471.30 462.80 462.90 -1.70% -1.68% 0.02% Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 47.83



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### enc 28

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED

.P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719 Run 3 Data Logger Reading for #38 Kiln Exhaust General Shale 9-21-01 Uncorrected Corrected Reading Date Time PPM NOx PPM NOx 1 09/21/0111:47:24 47.333 46.08 2 09/21/01 11:47:54 46.363 45.10 3 09/21/01 11 :48:24 44.745 43.46 4 09/21/01 11:48:54 46.623 45.36 5 09/21/01 11:49:24 48.163 46.92 6 09/21/01 11:49:54 48.385 47.15 7 09/21/0111:50:24 46.097 44.83 8 09/21/0111:50:54 45.797 44.53 9 09/21/01 11:51:24 47.206 45.95 10 09/21/01 11:51:54 47.993 46.75 11 09/21/01 11:52:24 47.78 46.53 12 09/21/01 11:52:54 45.789 44.52 13 09/21/0111:53:24 45.871 44.60 14 09/21/0111:53:54 47.954 46.71 15 09/21/01 11:54:24 49.046 47.82 16 09/21/0111:54:54 48.106 46.86 17 09/21/0111:55:24 47.063 45.81 18 09/21/01 11:55:54 48.554 47.32 19 09/21/01 11:56:24 49.133 47.91 20 09/21/0111:56:54 48.967 47.74 21 09/21/01 11:57:24 46.689 45.43 22 09/21/01 11:57:54 46.467 45.20 23 09/21/01 11:58:24 46.793 45.53 24 09/21/0111:58:54 49.167 47.94 25 09/21/0111:59:24 50.638 49.43 26 09/21/01 11:59:54 47.241 45.99 27 09/21/01 12:00:24 46.61 45.35 28 09/21/0112:00:54 45.271 43.99 29 09/21/0112:01:24 44.575 43.29 30 09/21/0112:01:54 44.123 42.83 31 09/21/01 12:02:24 42.497 41.18 32 09/21/0112:02:54 43.727 42.43 33 09/21/01 12:03:24 45.141 43.86 34 09/21/01 12:03:54 45.797 44.53 35 09/21/01 12:04:24 44.928 43.65 36 09/21/01 12:04:54 43.697 42.40 37 09/21/01 12:05:24 43.371 42.07 38 09/21/01 12:05 54 44.462 43.17


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 2939 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 09/21/01 12:06:24 09/21/01 12:06:54 09/21/01 12:07:24 09121/01 12:07:54 09/21/01 12:08:24 09/21/01 12:08:54 09121/01 12:09:24 09/21/01 12:09:54 09/21/01 12:10:24 09/21/01 12:10:54 09121/0112:1.1:24 09/21/0112:11:54 09/21/01 12:12:24 09/21/01 12:12:54 09/21/01 12:13:24 09/21/01 12:13:54 09/21/01 12:14:24 09/21/01 12:14:54 09/21/01 12:15:24 09/21/0112:15:54 09/21/01 12:16:24 09/21/01 12:16:54 09/21/01 12:17:24 09/21/0112:17:54 09/21/01 12:18:24 09/21/0112:18:54 09/21/01 12:19:24 09/21/01 12:19:54 09/21/01 12:20:24 09/21/01 12:20:54 09/21/01 12:21:24 09/21/01 12:21:54 09/21/01 12:22:24 09121/01 12:22:54 09/21/01 12:23:24 09/21/01 12:23:54 09/21/01 12:24:24 09/21/01 12:24:54 09/21/01 12:25:24 09/21/01 12:25:54 09/21/01 12:26:24 09/21/01 12:26:54 09/21/01 12:27:24 09/21/01 12:27:54 09/21/01 12:28:24 09/21/01 12:28:54 09/21/01 12:29:24 09/21/01 12:29:54 09/21/01 12:30:24 09/21/01 12:30:54 09/21/01 12:31 :24 44.923 44.014 42.318 44.488 45.106 45.349 42.897 42.958

44.51 45.232 43.514 43.219 44.332 45.336 45.884 44.032 43.323

44.14 45.819 46.384 45.984 46.554 47.228 48.419 47.389 45.876 47.902 48.698

49.05 47.584 47.719 47.541 47.011 47.315 45.076 45.976 47.832

49.38 48.998 46.432 47.284 48.511

49.02 47.119 45.306 46.541 48.502 49.929 46.637 47.393 48.867



### 30 43.64 42.72 41.00 43.20 43.83 44.07 41.59 41.65 43.22 43.95 42.21 41.91 43.04 44.06 44.61 42.74 42.02 42.85 44.55 45.12 44.71 45.29 45.98 47.18 46.14 44.61 46.66 47.46 47.82 46.34 46.47 46.29 45.76 46.06 43.80 44.71 46.59 48.16 47.77 45.17 46.03 47.28 47.79 45.86 44.03 45.28 47.27 48.71 45.38 46.14 47.64 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc90 09/21/01 12:31:54 49.507 48.28 91 09121/01 12:32:24 48.946 47.72 92 09/21/01 12:32:54 47.197 45.94 93 09/21/01 12:33:24 47.845 46.60 94 09121/01 12:33:54 49.607 48.39 95 09/21/01 12:34:24 50.681 49.47 96 09/21/01 12:34:54 49.02 47.79 97 09/21/01 12:35:24 47.445 46.20 98 09/21/01 12:35:54 48.228 46.99 99 09/21/01 12:36:24 49.393 48.17 100 09121/01 12:36:54 51.059 49.86 101 09/21/01 12:37:24 48.906 47.68 102 09/21/01 12:37:54 48.285 47.05 103 09/21/01 12:38:24 49.767 48.55 104 09/21/01 12:38:54 51.911 50.72 105 09121/01 12:39:24 50.594 49.39 106 09121/01 12:39:54 48.267 47.03 107 09/21/01 12:40:24 49.293 48.07 108 09/21/01 12:40:54 50.281 49.07 109 09/21/01 12:41:24 50.581 49.37 110 09/21/01 12:41:54 50.228 49.01 111 09/21/01 12:42:24 48.741 47.51 112 09/21/01 12:42:54 48.402 47.16 113 09/21/01 12:43:24 48.132 46.89 114 09/21/01 12:43:54 46.145 44.88 115 09/21/01 12:44:24 45.615 44.34 116 09/21/01 12:44:54 44.136 42.84 117 09121/01 12:45:24 45.145 43.86 118 09/21/01 12:45:54 47.263 46.01 119 09121/01 12:46:24 47.35 46.10 120 09/21/01 12:46:54 44.645 43.36 Average 46.93 45.67 System Calibration Bias and Drift Data Analyzer Initial Final Calib Initial Final System Bias System Bias 0 Drift Cal Drift Value ppm Value ppm Value ppm Error,% Error,% Error,% Error,% 1.70 1.70 2.00 0.00% 0.06% 0.06% 471.30 462.90 467.60 -1.68% -0.74% 0.94% Allowable Values 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% Span Value 500 ppm Gas Concentration, ppm 45.67



### 31 

### GUARCIIAN SYSTEMS 1nc

# Ill. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

General All sampling and analytical procedures for the determination of the particulate emissionsfrom thesesourceswere conducted in strictadherence with the Code ofFederal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1-4, 6C, ?E, 9 & 

### 26a, as amended. The sampling equipment used in these tests was manufactured by Nuetech Corporation and was properly calibrated before and after these tests (See Calibrations). 

### The particulate mass was determined gravimetrically after removal ofthe uncombined water. The hydrogen fluoride mass was determined by ion chromatography (IC).


### METHOD 1 "To aid in the representative measurement ofpollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from 

### a stationary source, 

### a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in 

### a known direction is selected, and the cross-section ofthe stack is dividedinto 

### a numberofequalareas. A traversepointis then located within each ofthese equalareas. This methodis applicable to flowing gas streams in ducts, stacks, andflues. The method cannotbe used when: (1) flow is cyclonic orswirling, (2) 

### a stack is smaller than about 0.30 meter(12 in.) in diameter, or0.071 m2 (113 in2 ) in cross-sectionalarea, or(3) the measurementsite is less than two stackorduct diameters downstream orless than 

### a halfdiameterupstream from 

### a flow disturbance. Sampling orvelocitymeasurementisperformedat

### a sitelocatedatleasteightstack orduct diameters downstream and two diameters upstream from any flow disturbance such as 

### a bend, expansion, or contraction in the stack, or from 

### a visible flame. If necessary, an alternative location maybeselected, at

### a position atleasttwo stackorduct diameters downstream and

### a halfdiameterupstream from anyflow disturbance. For

### a rectangularcrosssection, anequivalentdiameter(D.) shallbecalculatedfrom the following equation, to determine the upstream anddownstream distances:


### 0 

### =

e 

### 2LW L+W where L 

### = length and W

### = width."' 

### This method was used to select the number of sampling points and the required sampling matrix. The dimensions ofthe sample locations (see Figure 1 ) 

### indicated that 12 points would be required to sample the Kiln exhaust stack. We sampled 6 points per 'Method 1 -Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 32port forfive minutes a point for the test. Verification ofabsence ofcyclonic flow was not determined because cyclonic flow did not seem to exist from the stack exhaust. 

### METHOD2 "The average gas velocityin a stackis determinedfrom the gas densityandfrom measurement ofthe average velocityheadwith a TypeS (Stausscheibe orreverse type) pitot tube. This method is applicable formeasurement ofthe average velocity ofa gas stream andforquantifyinggas flow. Thisprocedureisnotapplicableatmeasurementsites that fail to meet the criteria ofMethod 1. Also, the method cannot be used for direct measurement in cyclonic orswirling gas streams. ltWJen unacceptable conditions exist, alternative procedures, subject to the approval ofthe Administrator. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, must be employed to make accurate flow rate determinations; examples ofsuch alternative procedures are: (1) to install straightening vanes; (2) to calculate the total volumetric flow rate stoichiometrically, or (3) to move to another measurement site at which the flow is acceptable. Specifications for the apparatus are given below. Any otherapparatus that has been demonstrated(subjectto approvaloftheAdministrator) to be capable of meeting the specifications will be considered acceptable. Pitot tube made of metal tubing (e.g., stainless steel). Itis recommendedthatthe externaltubingdiameterbe between 0.48and 0. 95 em (3/16 and318 inch). There shallbe an equal distance from the base ofeach leg oft hepitottube to its face-openingplane; itis recommendedthatthis distancebebetween 1.05 and 1.50 times the external tubing diameter. The TypeS pitot tube shall have a known coefficient. An inclinedmanometerorequivalentdevice. Mostsampling trains are equipped with a 10-in. (watercolumn) inclined-vertical manometer. having 0. 01-in. H 2

### 0 divisions on the 0- to l-in. inclinedscale, and0.1-in. H 20divisions on the 1- to 10-in. vertical scale. This type ofmanometer(orothergauge ofequivalentsensitivity) is satisfactoryfor the measurement ofr.p values as lowas 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HzO. However, a differential pressure gauge of greater sensitivity shall be used (subject to the approval of the Administrator), ifanyofthe following is found to be true: (1) the arithmetic average ofall !Jp readings at the traverse points in the stackis less than 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HzO,· (2) for traverses of 12 ormore points, more than 10percent ofthe individual !Jp readings are below 1.3 mm (0. 05 in.) H 20; (3) for traverses offewerthan 12points, more than one !Jp reading is below 1.3 mm (0.05 in.) HP "' Velocity readings were taken with a properly calibrated S type pilot tube and a 0- 

### 10.0 inch inclined-vertical manometer; which had 

### 0.01 inch 

### H2

### 0 divisions on the Oto 

### 1inch inclined scale, and 

### 0.1 inch 

### HP divisions on the 

### 1 to 

### 10 inch vertical scale for the dryer stack. 

### A micromanometer 

### (0-0.25 inch scale), having 

### 0.001 inch 

### H20 divisions on the 

### 0 to 

### 0.25 inch inclined scale was used on the exhaust stack due to the sufficient number of the low velocity pressures as specified in Method 2.

2Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pilot Tube), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 33

### METHOD3 "This method is applicable fordetermining carbon dioxide 

### (CO.) andoxygen 

### (0.) concentrations and drymolecular weight of

### a sample from 

### a gas stream of

### a fossil-fuel combustionprocess. The methodmayalsobe applicable to other processes where ithas been determinedthatcompounds otherthan 

### C0 2, 

### 0 2, 

### carbon monoxide 

### (CO), andnitrogen (NJ are notpresent in concentrations sufficient to affect the results. A gas sample is extracted from 

### a stackbyone ofthe following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzedforpercent

### C0 2, 

### percent

### 0 2, 

### andifnecessary, forpercent 

### CO. Fordry molecular weight determination, eitheran Orsator

### a Fyrite analyzermaybe usedforthe analysis

.. a Gas composition for CO 2, 0 2, and N 2 by difference was performed twice during each particulate test by using the grab sampletechnique and analyzed with a Hays Orsat Gas Analyzer (0-50% scale with 0.2% divisions). 

### METHOD4 "A gas sample is extractedat

### a constantrate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample stream and determined either volumetrically orgravimetrically. This methodis applicable fordetermining the moisture content ofstackgas. Twoprocedures aregiven. The firstis

### a reference method, foraccurate determinations ofmoisture content(such as are neededto calculate emission data). The secondis an approximation method, which provides estimates of percentmoisture to aidin setting isokinetic samplingratespriorto

### a pollutantemission measurementrun. The approximation method described herein is only 

### a suggested approach; alternative means for approximating the moisture content, e.g., drying tubes, wet bulb-dry bulb techniques, condensation techniques, stoichiometric calculations, previous experience, etc., are also acceptable. The reference methodis often conductedsimultaneouslywith 

### a pollutantemission measurementrun; when itis, calculation of percentisokinetic, pollutantemission rate, etc., forthe run shallbe basedupon the results ofthe reference methodorits equivalent; these calculations shallnotbe basedupon the results ofthe approximation method, unless the approximation methodisshown, to thesatisfaction oftheAdministrator, U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency, to be capable of yieldingresults within IpercentH 2

### 0ofthe reference method. The reference methodmay yieldquestionableresults when appliedtosaturatedgas streams orto streams thatcontain waterdroplets. Therefore, when these conditions exist orare suspected, 

### a seconddetermination ofthe moisture contentshallbe made simultaneously with the reference method, as follows: Assume thatthe gas stream is saturated. Attach 

### a temperature sensor[capable ofmeasuring to within 

### fC (Z'F)] to the reference methodprobe. Measure the stack gas temperature at each traverse point during the reference methodtraverse; calculate the average stackgas temperature. Next, determine the moisturepercentage, eitherby: 

## (0 using

### apsychometric chartandmakingappropriate

3Method 3 - Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1. 2000. 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 34

### corrections ifstackpressure is differentfrom thatofthe chart, or(2) usingsaturation vapor pressure tables."' The moisture content ofthe stack gases was determined in conjunction with each Method 26a test by measuring the amount ofwater collected in the impingers, condenser and the increase in weight ofthe silica gel. Theseweightswere combined to givethetotal amount ofwater collected. 

### METHOD 6C "This methodis applicable to the determination ofsulfurdioxide (SO.} concentrationsin controlledanduncontrolledemissionsfrom stationarysourcesonlywhen specified within the regulations. A gassample is continuouslyextractedfrom 

### a stack, and

### a portion of the sample is conveyed to an instrumental analyzer for determination of S0 2 

### gas concentration using an ultraviolet (UV), nondispersive infrared (NDJR), orfluorescence analyzer. Performance specifications andtestprocedures areprovidedto ensure reliable data. The analyticalrange is determinedbythe instrumental design. Forthis method, 

### a portion ofthe analyticalrange is selectedbychoosing the span ofthe monitoringsystem. The span of the monitoring system shall be selected such that the pollutant gas concentration equivalent to the emission standardis notJess than

### 30percentofthe span. If

### atanytime during

### a run the measuredgas concentration exceeds thespan, the run shall be consideredinvalid. The minimum detectable limitdepends on the analyticalrange, span, andsignal-tonoise ratio of the measurement system. For 

### a well designed system, the minimum detectable limitshouldbe less than 2 percentofthe span. Span. The upperlimit ofthe gas concentration measurement range displayedon the data recorder. Calibration Gas. 

### A known concentration ofa 

### gas in an appropriate diluentgas. AnalyzerCalibration E"or. The differencebetween thegasconcentration exhibited bythegasanalyzerandtheknown concentration of the calibrationgas when the calibration gas is introduced directly to the analyzer. Sampling System Bias. The difference between the gas concentrations exhibited bythe measurementsystem when 

### a known concentration gas is introducedat the outlet ofthe samplingprobe and when the same gas is introduced directlyto the analyzer. Zero Drift. The difference in themeasurementsystem outputreadingfrom theinitial calibration response atthezeroconcentrationlevelafter

### a stated periodofoperation during which no unscheduledmaintenance, repair, oradjustment tookplace. Calibration Drift. The difference in the measurementsystem outputreading from the initial calibration response at 

### a mid-range calibration value after

### a statedperiod of operation during which no unscheduledmaintenance, repair, oradjustment tookplace. Response Time. The amount oftime required for the measurement system to display 95percent ofa 

### step change in gas 

### concentration on the data recorder.

4Method 4 - Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000.
35 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

### Interference Check. A methodfordetectinganalyticalinterferences andexcessive biases through direct comparison ofgas concentrations providedby the measurement system andby

### a modified Method 6procedure. For this check, the modified Method 6 samples are acquiredat the sample by-pass discharge vent.,.; General The sampling train consisted of a sample probe, heated sampling line, calibration valve assembly, acondenserto removecondensatefromthe samplegaswhile maintaining minimal contact between any condensate and the sample gas, particulate filter, sample pump, sampleflow rate control, sample gas manifold, S02 analyzer (HoribaVIA-510serial 

### # 4278) and a Fluke Data Logger (2625a/6204605). See Figure 4. Thefollowing measurementsystem performancespecificationswerecomplied with during these tests: 1. Analyzer Calibration Error- Less than±2% ofthe span for thezero, mid-range, and high-range calibration gases. 2. Sampling System Bias
- Less than± 5% ofthe span for the zero, and mid- or high-range calibration gases. 3. Zero Drift
- Less than±.3% ofthe span overthe period of each run. 4. Calibration Drift
- Less than ± 3% ofthe span overthe period ofeach run. Measurement System Preparation The system was assembled by following the manufacturer's written instruction for preparing and preconditioning the gas analyzer and the other system components. Various calibration gaseswerethen introducedand all necessaryadjustmentswere made to calibrate the analyzer and the data recorder. Then an analyzer calibration error check was conducted by introducing calibration gases to the measurementsystem atthe back ofthe analyzerand all measurementswere lessthan±2% ofthe span forany ofthe calibration gases. Nextthe sampling system bias check was conducted by introducing calibration gases at the calibration valve installed at the outlet ofthe sampling probe. A zero, mid-range, and high-range gas were introduced. During this check, the system was operated at the normal sampling rate, and no adjustments to the measurement system other than those necessary to achieve proper

5Method 6C
- Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources ( Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000.


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 36calibration gas flow rates to the analyzer was done. The response time was determined during this check. All measurementswere less than.± 5% ofthe span for eitherthe zero or upscale calibration gas. Emission Test Procedure The probewas positioned atthe sampling location and sampling began atthe same rate as used during the system calibration drift test. A constant sampling rate was maintainedduringthe entire run. The samplingtime per run was 60 minutes, and datawas not collected until twice the system response time had elapsed. Immediately following each run, the sampling system bias checkwas redonewithout making any adjustmentsto the measurement system. All valueswere within acceptable limits. The average ofthe initial and final bias checkvalues were used to calculate the gasconcentration forthe run. An inference check for this source category was determined at an earlier date using a modified method 6. The results ofthe modified method 6 were compared to the results taken at the same time for method 6c. The difference was less than or equal 7%. 

### METHOD7E "This methodis applicable to the determination ofnitrogen oxides (NO,J concentrations in emissions from stationarysources only when specified within the regulations. A sample is continuouslyextractedfrom the effluentstream; aportion ofthe sample stream is conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination of NO, concentration. Performance specifications and testprocedures are provided to ensure reliable data. Range andsensitivityis the same as 

### in Method6C. The Sample Interface, Gas

### Analyzer, andData Recorderare the same as 

### in Method6C. A N0 2 

### to NO Converter is a device that converts the nitrogen dioxide (NO.) in the sample gas to nitrogen oxide (NO). The Span, Calibration Gas, 

### AnalyzerCalibration Error, Sampling System Bias, Zero Drift, Calibration Drift, andResponse Time are the same as 

### in Method 6C."6 General The sampling train consisted ofa sample probe, heated sampling line, calibration valve assembly, a refrigerator-type condenserto remove condensatefrom the sample gas while maintaining minimal contact between any condensate and the sample gas, particulate filter, sample pump, sample flow rate control, sample gas manifold, NO,

6Method 7E- Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure), Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000.


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 37

### analyzer (Beckman 921A NO/NOx Analyzer serial# 0100084) and a Fluke Data Logger (2625a/6205604). See Figure 5. 

### Upon receipt of the NOx Analyzer an interference response test was conducted using 500 ppm CO, 200 ppm S02, 

### 10.5% C02, 

### and 20.7% 0 2• 

### These gases were introduced as a gas mixture to the analyzer and the total interference response was Jess than 2% ofthe span value of 249 ppm NOx. Beforefield use the N02

### to NO conversion efficiencywas determined by adding gas from the mid-level NO in N2 

### (505 ppm) to a clean, evacuated, leak-tight Tedlar bag. This gas was diluted approximately 1:1 with 20.9%02, 

### purified air. The bag was immediately attached to the calibration valve assembly and sampling begun, recording the NOx response for 30 minutes. The N02 

### to NO conversion was 100% as the instrument response was stable atthe highest peak value observed and did not decrease more than 2.0% ofthe highest peak value. ! 

### Thefollowing measurementsystem performancespecificationswere complied with during these tests: 1. Analyzer Calibration Error
- Less than.± 2% ofthe span for the zero, mid-range, and high-range calibration gases. 2. Sampling System Bias
- Less than .± 5% of the span for the zero, and mid or high range calibration gases. 3. Zero Drift- Less than.± 3% ofthe span overthe period ofeach run. 4. Calibration Drift
- Less than .± 3% of the span over the period of each run. Measurement System Preparation The system was assembled by following the manufacturer's written instruction for preparing and preconditioning the gas analyzer and the other system components. Various calibration gaseswerethen introduced and all necessaryadjustmentswere made to calibrate the analyzer and the data recorder. Then an analyzer calibration error check was conducted by introducing calibration gasesto the measurementsystem atthe back ofthe analyzer and all measurements were less than.±2% ofthe span for any ofthe calibration gases. Nextthe sampling system bias check was conducted by introducing calibration gases at the calibration valve installed at the outlet ofthe sampling probe. A zero, mid-range, and high-range gas was introduced. 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 38

### During this check, the system was operated at the normal sampling rate, and no adjustments to the measurement system other than those necessary to achieve proper calibration gas flow rates to the analyzerwere done. The response time was determined during this check. All measurements were less than 

## .± 5% ofthe span for either the zero or upscale calibration gas. Emission Test Procedure The probewas positioned atthesampling location and sampling began atthesame rate as used during the system calibration drift test. A constant sampling rate was maintained duringthe entire run. The samplingtime per run was 60 minutes, and data was not collected until twice the system response time had elapsed. Immediately following each run, the sampling system bias check was redone without making anyadjustments to the measurement system. All values were within acceptable limits. The average ofthe initial and final bias check values were used to calculate the gas concentration forthe run. 

### METHOD 9 "Manystationarysources discharge visible emissions into the atmosphere; these emissions are usuallyin the shape of

### a plume. This methodinvolves the determination of plume opacityby qualifiedobservers. The methods includes procedures forthe training and certification ofobservers andprocedures to be usedin the field fordetermination of plume opacity. The appearance of

### a plume as viewedbyan observerdepends upon

### a numberof variables, some of which may be controllable in the field. Variables which can be controlled to an extent.to which they no longerexert

### a significant influence upon plume appearanceinclude: angle ofthe observerwith respectto theplume; angleofthe observer with respect to the sun; pointofobservation ofattachedanddetachedsteamplume; and angle ofthe observerwith respectto 

### aplume emittedfrom 

### a rectangularstack with 

### a large length to width ratio. The methodincludes specific criteria applicable to these variables. Other variables which may not be controllable in the field are luminescence and colorcontrastbetween theplume andthe backgroundagainstwhich theplume is viewed. These variables exert an influence upon the appearance of

### a plume as viewed by an observerand can affect the abilityofthe observerto assign accuratelyopacity values to the observed plume. Studies of the theory ofplume opacity and field studies have demonstratedthat

### aplumeismostvisibleand presentsthegreatestapparentopacitywhen viewed against

### a contrasting background. Accordingly, the opacity of

### a plume viewed under conditions where 

### a contrasting background is present can be assigned with the greatestdegree of accuracy. However, thepotentialfor

### apositive errorisalso thegreatest when 

### a plume is viewed undersuch contrasting conditions. Underconditionspresenting 

### a less contrasting background, the apparent opacityof

### a plume is less andapproaches zero 

### as the colorandluminescence contrastdecrease towardzero. As

### a result, significant negative bias and negative errors can be made when 

### a plume is viewed under less contrasting conditions. A negativebias decreases ratherthanincreases thepossibilitythat 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS IMC 

### 39a plant operator willbe incorrectly citedfora violation ofopacitystandards as a result of obseNererror. Studies have been undertaken to determine the magnitude of positive errors made by qualified obseNers while reading plumes undercontrasting conditions andusing the proceduressetforth in thismethod. The results ofthese studies (fieldtrials) which involve a total of769 sets of25 readings each are as follows: (1) Forblackplumes (133 sets ata smoke generator), 100percentofthe sets were read with apositive errorofless than 

### 7. 5percentopacity; 99percent were read with apositive errorofJess than 5 percent opacity. (Note: Fora set, positive error

### = average opacity determined by obseNers' 25 obseNations -average opacity determined from transmissometer's 25 recordings.) (2) Forwhite plumes (170 sets at

### a smoke generator, 168sets at

### a coal-firedpower plant, 298 sets at

### a sulfuric acidplant), 99percent ofthe sets were read with 

### a positive errorof less than 7.5 percent opacity; 95 percent were read with 

### a positive error ofless than 5 percentopacity. Thepositive obseNationalerrorassociatedwith an average oftwenty-five readings is therefore established. The accuracyofthe methodmust be taken into account when determiningpossible violations ofapplicable opacitystandards. 

### PROCEDURES Position. The qualifiedobseNershallstandat

### a distancesufficienttoprovide

### a clear viewofthe emissions with the sun orientedin the 140 osectorto his back. Consistent with maintaining the above requirement, the obseNershall, as much as possible, make his obseNations from 

### a position such thathis line ofvision is approximatelyperpendicularto the plume direction and, when obseNing opacity ofemissions from rectangular outlets (e. g., roofmonitors, open baghouses, noncircularstacks), approximatelyperpendicularto the longeraxis ofthe outlet. The obseNer's line ofsightshouldnotinclude more than one plume at

### a time when multiple stacks are involved, andin anycase the obseNershould make his obseNations with his line ofsightperpendicularto the longeraxis ofsuch a set ofmultiple stacks (e.g., stub stacks on baghouses). The obseNershall record the name ofthe plant, emission location, facility type, obseNer's name andaffiliation, andthe date on 

### a fielddata sheet (Figure 9-1). The time, estimated distance to the emission location, approximate wind direction, estimated wind speed, description of the sky condition (presence and color of clouds), and plume backgroundare recordedon

### a fielddata sheetatthe time opacityreadingsareinitiatedand completed."7 Three (3) one hour readings were performed on this source by Mr. Terry Gaither, an ADEM certified VE reader, #3433. A position with a clear view ofthe emissions was chosen with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back.

7Method 9 - Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000. 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 40

### METHOD26A "This method is applicable for determining emissions ofhydrogen halides and halogens from stationary sources. Gaseous andparticulate pollutants are withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected in an optional cyclone, on a filter , and in absorbing solutions. 

### Ifdesired, the particulate matterrecovered from the filterand the probe is analyzedfollowing the procedures in Method

### 5. ' 6 Sampling Techniques Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, range of velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecularweight priorto sampling. A HP Palmtop 200LX computer and a HP-20S were used to calculate the sampling rate for isokinetic sampling. The particulate determinations were made by utilizing the sample train in Figure3. The meterboxwas leak checkedfromthe pumptothe orifice. Initial and final leak checks ofthe sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 andwere recorded on the data sheets (See Field Data). The nozzle (glasswith an angle oftaperof30 degrees and ofbutton hookdesign) was calibrated beforeand after each test using a micrometer and was also recorded on the data sheets. The sampling probe was placed at each sampling pointto provide atotal sampling time of60 minutes. The gases were drawn through a glass nozzle attached to a heated glass lined probe. The probe was maintained at the proper setting to obtain an exit temperature of 248 .:': 25

# °F (See Calibrations). The gases then proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through a quartz fiber filter (Pallflex) to remove particulate matter. The filter was maintained at a temperature of248 .:': 25

# °F. These temperatures were recorded at each point on the data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers to capture hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. (The optional first impingerfor a knockout for moisture was not used.) The first and second impingers contained approximately 100 ml ofa 0.1 N H2S04 solution and were ofthe Greenburg-Smith design. The third impinger contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution and was of the modified Greenburg-Smith design, and the fourth contained approximately 200 grams ofsilica gel.
'Method 26A- Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From Stationary Sources
- lsokinetic Method, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Section 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000.


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMStnc 41

### The gases then pass through a condenser placed in an ice bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of68

# °F. This temperature was also recorded on the data sheets. The gases then pass through a pre-weighed drying column filled with indicating silica gel to remove any remaining moisture. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box where the gas flow and temperature were measured. (See Field Data) WITH NOVISIBLEMOISTURE PRESENT, THIS PROCEDUREWAS NOT USED DURING THESE TESTS. 

### Upon completion ofthe sampling and the final leak checks, the ambient air conditioning tube was connected at the probe inlet and the sample train operated with the filter heating system at 

### 248 +

### 25 °F at a flow rate ofah 

### = 1 

### inch H2

### 0 to vaporize any liquid and hydrogen halides in the cyclone or on the filter and pull them through the train into the impingers. After 

### 30 minutes, the flow was turned off, and the cyclone and filter were examined for anyvisible moisture. Ifany moisture was visible, this process was repeated for 

### 15 minutes. After the post-test moisture removal procedure, the sampling train and the probe nozzle assemblywas transferred to the cleanup area making sure no particulatewas lost. The cleanup data was recorded on Particulate Sample Recovery and Integrity Sheet 

### located in the Field Data Section. Particulate catches were placed in sealed petri dishes. Each acetone rinse from the nozzle, probe, and filter holderwas combined and placed in a sealed container. For the group oftests an acetone blank ofapproximately

### 200 milliliters was placed in a sealed container. The first and second impinger contents were transferred to its tared container, weighed and the rinsings from the glassware were added to this container. The third impingerwas transferred to its respective tared container, weighed and the rinsings from the glassware were added to this container. The silica gel from the fourth impingerwas transferred to its respective tared container and weighed. A blank of the sulfuric acid solution was taken. These containers were clearly marked and transported to our laboratory for analysis. Analysis The filters (Pallflex, quartz-fiber) were prepared for the field test byfirst heating for 

### 2 hours 

### 220 degrees F then desiccating at 68 

## ± 10

# °Fat ambient pressure for 

### 24 hours and weighing at intervals ofat least six (6) hours to a constant weight to the nearest 

### 0.1

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 42

### milligrams (less than 0.5 milligrams change from previous reading). Upon return to the laboratory, the filters were subjected to the same procedures as outlined above. The weights were recorded in a bound laboratory book and transferred to the sheets in this report (Method 5TrainAnalytical Particulate Data). 

### During each weighing the filterwas not exposed to laboratory atmosphere for more than two (2) minutes and a relative humidity of less than fifty percent (50%). The acetone (reagent grade, 0.001% residue, in glass bottles) blank {Blank Analytical Data) 

### for the group of tests and the acetone rinses for each test were evaporated to dryness in tared glass beakers. They were then desiccated fortwenty-four (24) hours and weighed to a constant weight as described above. The sulfuric acid capture solutions were analyzed at our laboratory using ion chromatography (IC).



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 43

# STACK BREECHING AND SAMPLE POINT LOCATION



# 0 #38 KILN EXHAUST STACK



# "' j i I

119"



### Figure 1



### 44 1 

### 2 3 4 

### 5 6 1.9 6.5 13.0 31.6 37.5 42.1



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc

## INTEGRA TED SAMPLING TRAIN METHOD3

AIR..COOLEil CONOE.'IS£!1

FILTER (GlASS'HtJOll 

# I I RAHMETEFI.

QUJCX OISCO!I!IEC1'

### ---;j



# -

# ~ 

# .c!G. VAlVE • .

RIGIO CONTAINER



### Figure 2 BAG



### GUAJ:IOIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 45

# f

G' 

# HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN METHOD 26A

'!'etlOA ot'**Quar~: ru~** 

### ...---r-X---,

lleaucl holM ·

epticaal SUiea 

### o. Ul !laO! O.lll**~ Calillra~ad**  Orilic:e

Cry Gas Vac

..,.. w..ar· P'oap



### Figure 3



### 46 GUARCIAN sYSTEMS 1ncHEATED PROSE 

# SULFUR DIOXIDE (502) 

# SAMPLING TRAIN METHOD6C

STACX IIAU.H[ATED Fll TER CAUBRATIOH VALV£

MOISTURE ·REMOVAl SYSTEH HEATED SA14PlE l!IIE SAMPLE BY-Pi\SS BY-PASS FLOW CONTROl VALVE

SAMPLE TRAIISPORT LINE VENT

SA.'1PLE

GAS NAillFOLD
SAI1PLE FlOW CONTROL VAlVE Figure 6C-l. ""•surement system schematic.
EXCESS SAI1PLE VENT

SAI1PLE BY-PASS VENT HEEDlE VALVE

J:**~~.zoz** (15 ml each) ROTAMfTER



### Figure 4 GAS NIAlYlER

ANALHER FLQ\1 CONTROL VAlVE

ORT GAS

I'ITEJ!



### 47 GUAROIAN SYSTEMS 1nc

## •• 

# NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) SAMPLING TRAIN METHOD 7E

HEATED PROBE BY-PASS fl(l\1 CONTROl YAlYE

SAMPlE TiWISPORT liNE SAMPlE BY-PASS VENT

CA.S HOISTIIR£ ·RLHOYAl SYSTE!I SA.'1Pl£ CA.S MitIFOlD
SAI'l'lE FlOW CONTROl VA.lYE 

# l AltA.lTZER

**.l.~AI.**TZER flOW CONTROl YA.lYE

Figure 5 

### (

GUAI=IOIAN sYSTEMS 1nc 48

# NOMENCLATURE ACF- Actual Cubic Feet ACFM- Actual Cubic Feet per minute ACM -Actual Cubic Meters ACMS- Actual Cubic Meters per second An
- Cross sectional area ofnozzle, 

### (ff) A.
- Area of Stack, 

### (ff) 

### Bws

- Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by volume (dimensionless) 

# c.- Acetone blank residue concentration, mg/g
c. - Particulate Concentration, ACF CFM
- Cubic feet per minute C0 - 

### Pitot tube coefficient, (dimensionless)
c.- Particulate Concentration, grains/DSCF Cso2- 

### Concentration ofsulfur dioxide (dry basis) corrected to standard conditions, lb/DSCF C12 - 

### Particulate concentration (c. adjusted to 12% excess air), grains/DSCF C50 - 

### Particulate concentration (c. adjusted to 50% excess air), grains/DSCF DSCF
- Dry Standard Cubic Feet DSCFM
- Dry Standard Cubic Feet per minute DSCM
- Dry Standard Cubic Meters DSCMS
- Dry Standard Cubic Meters per second EA
- Excess Air, % I
- lsokinetic Sampling, 

### %

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 49

# NOMENCLATURE - continued

Km
- Orifice Correction Factor, (dimensionless) KP- Pitot tube constant, 85.49 llb/lb-mole)(in.HqlY:. (0

### R) (in. H2

### 0) L.
- Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a pretest leak check or for a leak check following a component change; equal to 0.02 CFM or 4 percent ofthe average sampling rate, whichever is less. L,- Individual leakage rate observed during the leak check conducted prior to the "i1 h" 

### component change (I = 1,2,3,

...n), CFM. LP- Leakage rate observed during the post test leak check, ft3

### /min. (cfm). M.
- Mass of residue ofacetone after evaporation, mg. Md- Molecular weight ofstack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole. Mn- Total amount ofparticulate matter collected, mg. M,- Molecularweight ofstack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole. Mw- Molecularweight ofwater, 18.0g/g-mole(18.011b/lb-mole) "P- Velocity head ofstack gas, in. H2

### 0 P.- Density of acetone, mg/ml Pbarm
- Barometric pressure at the sampling site, in. Hg P9 - 

### Stack static pressure, in. HP Pm- Meter pressure, in. Hg PMR -Particulate Mass Rate, Lbs per hour P,- Absolute stack pressure, in. Hg P,1

### d- Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg P

w- Density ofwater, 0.9982 g/ml (0.002201 lb/ml) 

# a.- Volumetric flow rate, ACFM


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 50

# NOMENCLATURE - continued
0,

- Volumetric flow rate, DSCFM R- Ideal gas constant, 0.06236 mm Hg- m3

### fK-g-mole (21.85 in. Hg-ft"fR-Ib -mole) · SCF
- Standard Cubic Foot t.- Ambient Temperature, °F tm - Average Temperature ofmeter, °F t,- Average Temperature ofstack, °F t,,d- Standard Temperature, 68°F 

### NOTE: Capital "T" denotes degrees Rankine

v.- Volume ofacetone blank, ml
v.w - Volume of acetone used in wash, ml V,c- Total volume of liquid collected in condenser and silica gel, ml V m - Volume ofgas sample, as measured by the dry gas meter, ACF Vmc- Volume ofgas sample, corrected for leak, ACF Vmstd- Volume ofgas sample measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, DSCF Vn - Volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, ACF V,- Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec. Vwstd- Volume ofwater in the gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, SCF 

# w.- Weight of residue in acetone wash, mg Y- Dry gas meter calibration factor, (dimensionless) .6.H - Average pressure differential across the calibrated orifice, in. H,O


### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 51

# NOMENCLATURE - continued

LI.H@- Value of H measured for a specific orifice when operated underthe following conditions: 0.75 cfm ofdry air (M.W. = 29) at 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg

. 

### .f

LI.P
- Average ofthe square roots ofthe velocity pressure, in. H20 0- Total Sampling time, min. 01 - Sampling time interval from the beginning of a run until the first component change, minutes. 0i
- Sampling time interval between two successive component changes, beginning with the interval between the first and second changes, minutes. 0p- Sampling time interval from the final {n1 h) component change until the end ofthe sampling run, minutes. %C02, %02, %N2, %CO- Number percent{%) by volume (dry basis) ofeach compound in the stack gas.



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 52

# EQUATIONS

1.
p p "'p 13 6



### 2.
b H p = p

# ·- 13 . 6

3.
T p 

# .. . v V Y(--){--) • T p

# ..

4.
v = 0 04707 v 

### •


### 5.
v

# - 8 v • v 

# ... 

# -

6.
M =0 440 (%CO 2 )+0.320 {%

**)~0.280** (% N % co



### 7.
M I • 18 {B



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 

### 53

# EQUATIONS
- Continued

8.

v o K C ({:"";)avg



# ~ . ' '



## -~ **~**
9.
Q o (v )(A )(60 

# . 

# . 

# .
10.

528 p >I --)I

_ ___:__ T 29 92



### 11.

c = [0 .0154 {M IV )J • n mud


### 12.
%0 -0.5%CO 

### ' EA o I I 100 0.264 % N 2 -(% 0 2 -0.5% CO)



### 13. ( 1 . 5 ) (% 0 2 )

- 0
. 133 (% N 2 )

- 0
. 75 (% CO ) c = c /1 - [ l



### " 

# . 21



### 14.

12 c 12 = { c •)( % 

### co 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 54

# EQUATIONS - Continued

15.
60 PMR • I c )( Q )( ___.;::...__ ' ' 7000


### 16.
T v ' m v • -{(0 002669 I I v I · -1 Y I I P I I • m p T



### 17.
c • • Io .0154 I I M .JI v

18.
100 v I• __ ____::__ 60 v 6 A '

19.
V •V ·IL ·L 16 m ' •
20.
w

**~** c v p 

# . . 

# -

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 55

## HAND EQUATIONS

2. Pm =Pbarm 

### + (n H/13.6) =



## (fr~l + (1.313)113.6

# = 1CJ :."'1- /

**~** 

### 3. Vm(std) = Vm Y (Tstd!TmHPm/Pstd)

= (flP4 

### )(,.no')(528/',

### iv )(



### 'lp·b'~'/29.92)

# =

4. vw(std) 

### = 0.04707 vic: 0.04707C{]".,) 

### =



## L\~ \\ /



### 6. Md 

### = 0.44 %C02 

### + 0.32 %02 

### + 0.28(%N2 

### + %CO) 

### = " " / .44(

### j.v) 

### + .32( 

### '"b)+ .28(



## 'IJO~) = 

# f'· <r c7



### 8. 

## v. = 

### Kpcp (/np) !(T.J(M.P.)) 

# =

**85.49(~q,fo)(;c;i'J)** /(1'-,J



# /(.;/)(?"' **~)**

# = ·I _./ ( L' !.)

**~~** /



### 10. O.

# =0.(1-Bws)(528fT.)(P.I29.92) 

# =(;'. .t'')(1:\\'



## )(528/1"ov)(;J"~t,/29.92)

# =

**~-**



### 56 ,I c...· .... f) \ 

### c • ' I



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# HAND EQUATIONS - Continued

I 

### 15. PMR = C5

## 0 5

### (60/7000) = 

# (oe'"u;)(··f)(60/7000) = 'J ·- ./


### 16. Vn 

# =T.fPs X 

### {(0.002669)V1 

### c+ VmY PmlTm} 

# =

**(1:".~)/l.'l** {(0.002669)(

### 1 v;..·) +



## ()~**v'>)( 0~~(,o**  **)/(~",')}** ""\
...

**0\~\** 

### 18. I= Vn(100)/{(60)8V5

### An} = 100(.:-;:\f{60(c,cJ)(1·"''}(.ifiJ1t = ' :'

**_)1,-<)'j~** l!

**·(~.** ;' ':



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 57

# NOMENCLATURE FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE

Coas = Effluent gas concentration, dry basis, ppm C = Average gas concentration indicated by gas analyzer, dry basis, ppm Co 

### = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses for the zero gas, ppm em 

# = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses for the upscale calibration gas, ppm Cma = Actual concentration ofthe upscale calibration gas, ppm MW = Molecular weight ofS02, which is equal to 

### 64.07 S02 PPH 

### = Sulfur dioxide mass rate in pounds per hour 

### 385.1 x 

### 106 

# = Conversion factor


# EQUATIONS FOR S02



### Cgas 

# =(C-Co ) X 

### (Cma) I 

### (Cm -Co) 

# = (}-

**~**

# q 

# J

-{, !,"'; ) X ( 

## 1../5 ¢- )

## I ( (- • c.. 

# - ' 

## ,.
- 

### (.

**~/** <;.f' so2

### #IDSCF

# =cgas X

# MW I 385.1 X 

### 106 

## = (,3C) 

## 4_"' ) X 

### (64.07)1(385.1 X 

### 106) 

## =

**--;vc-~** l\:)o 

# =S02 

### #IDSCF x DSGF"M x'6Q

- I , 

# = ( 4 .U-"Y, IV ) X ( 

### f' v-'- ) X 

### (60)

# =

GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 58

# NOMENCLATURE FOR NITROGEN OXIDES

C9as 

### = Effluent gas concentration, dry basis, ppm C 

### = Average gas concentration indicated by gas analyzer, dry basis , ppm C0 = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses forthe zero gas, ppm. em 

### = Average of initial and final system calibration bias check responses for the upscale calibration gas, ppm Cma = Actual concentration ofthe upscale calibration gas, ppm MW = Molecular weight of N02, which is equal to 46.01 NO. PPH = Nitrogen oxides (as N02) mass rate in pounds per hour 385.1 X 106 = Conversion factor


# EQUATIONS FOR NOX
Cgas 

# =(C-C0 ) 

### x (Cmal 

### I (Cm
- Co)


## =



# (t.f.(~ 

# -/? ) x



# (~~"~~I ( (jP 

## J 

# -17 ) - ,/(/

**?·~·**

**-~** {'Q


### NO. #/DSCF 

## = C9

### as 

### x MW 

### I 385.1 

### x 106



### ~

**,-~osf'P** 

# = (

**~** ! •.[ 

### b ) X (

### 46.01)1(385.1 X 

### 106) 

# =0 0'-''-'


### NO. PPH 

# = NO. #IDSCF x DSCFM x 60 

## = ( ) X ( ) X 

### (60) 

# =
NO. #IMBTU 

# =NO. #/DSCF 

### x F-Factor

### x (20.91(20.9-%02))



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 59

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC Method



### J~A Field Data Sheet Source¥

## 3B¥d,v 

# txre!Jrt Run#_\,_____Time,StartOfrliL/ EndCAL/D



### Bpd;.~7 "HgKFactor 

### Ia 

## 5510

Port & Time Point# Min. Meter Volume Ft' Stack Meter Temp GF Imp Box Temp t-----.----.-----iTemp Temp

'F In Out Avg •F 'F Meter Pressure

'H 0 Velocity Vac., Pressure

**~Hg**

'HO Static Pressure

**~H 0**  

### --f),

# J4 'A\ 5 C1J3.l- [,Jt,() 

## (RJ..

**~** 

## (

**~&** 

## 33 

## :J.Id.o 

## I00, 

### it;>_J3 /-) Pretest Post test 

### d. 

## to

**~n** 

# o bli-1

**~btl** 

## &3 bt.J 

## 33 

# bt-5 t.3ci fJ-XO 

# t-B .fJ.,Je;s 

# e cJr->5

Sample Box# 

### T f) Meter Box # 

### J 

## 000 Metert.H@ 

## .59 Meter Y Factor

**-e.~**

### 70-/ t-remperature Device # )

### D Probe# Lj
- 

## J Pilot

### c, .f). 

## b:lb Probe Liner Material

**~**

### /{DSJ Probe heat setting, 

## J. 'Sl)

**~mbient** Temperature 

## (ai fynte? 

# I Orsat? .-/ 

### p,o, 

## I% co, I Leak .Is
Pilot Pretest Post Test R '-(.(p 

### sJ.(.,. R S,( S t.{.d._ Pretest Leak ,/-&- .LOBCFM @ 

### IS'• Post test Leak 

### !{,I.

**~.(;;A__** CFM @1.(-() Notes 

## '7 )[J_ ) (h

Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.rRun# 

# d GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC Method

# M Field Data Sheet Source 

### t\

# 392 K:\.;, 

# 1 Meust Date

## "7/;)f

# f Jco( Time, Start 

## lbl0 End 

# !liD Bp

### ~"1.'7?- "Hg K Factor

_

### _,&"-'.~5.,5<-..!r-""()'----- Port & Time Meter Stack Meter Temp**~F** Imp Box Meter Velocity Vac. Static Pressure UH2 0 Point# Min. Volume Temp Temp Temp Pressure Pressure "Hg

_ 

# e . '"'IL/ Ft' 'F In Out Avg •f 'F "H 0 "H 0 o'-


### .·.··········· ..........**~'::().**

### {p{J1 •· ••:·•.••· · ... •I ,< .:.:·.··..··•·. : I 

### > , .····· · 

# I ? > •·· > Nozzle Diameter, Inches 

### 1\1 5 

### 9 5\.\,L,**l~lol** 

# ?J:i ff) 9.7( 

## 41 _('):t/J.. /.

# 0:2 .(Jjj- 

## 25 Pretest Post test 

### !) IO 

## '15Z),(p**-l1~** 

# l'btp**~\** 

## BLI 3E> B.LJ/ 

## J. IY f:J.LJU 

### 3-D 

# .O.:/d5 E-**~'J6'C**



### /!.. I 3'3 

## "\"'ft.,.S**~(/5** "''D 

## C05 

## €5tJ 3l.{ 

## fJl{/- 

## I.J'/**~**

## .Jb t.9.C f"L collected 

### f3L, I

Sample Box # 

# q**~eter** Box # (

## CliJ**~eter** llH@ /.

# D**~ ~eter**  Y Factor £)

## /1'k.J'J emperature Device# {

### 0 Probe # L

_;;} Pilot C, {;)

.

## Q/)D Probe Liner Material 

### ?;/m.£f Probe heat setting, 8<)() Ambient Temperature lfyrite? / Orsat? __...

J Leak .Is fJrtfice

Pretest Post Test R5./ S4.J. R(./ Sj_"l_ Pretest Leak ./(.;.coL/CFM@ (

## J**~** Posttest Leak ./ ,Y.!()( CFM@

### t,r() •r Notes 

## CfiS: t..(f**~**
Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.r 

### U!/
61

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC Method 

### Jlo4- Field Data Sheet

# Source~

# 35 }(;\).) [ tkuSt Date'11 

### J

# II Jco 1 

### Run# 

# 3 Time, Start \

## ilj$' End 

## J.)_L{j- BpJ3."l7- "HgKFactor

### ~.55l0

Port & Time Meter Stack Meter Temp oF Imp Box Meter Velocity Vac. Static Pressure "H20 Point# Min. Volume Temp Temp Temp Pressure Pressure "Hg



## - {). JL/ Ft' "F In Out Avg "F "F "HO "H 0

· .. ·

### .... 

## Cfl5.553 I ··. < 

# •.···
>········.····· 

### ...

# •··.·

- 

# .• .• _.· < << 

### I·•······ Nozzle Diameter, Inches ,· 

## AI 5 0"'1'7 

## D :3-.10 '?71£? 

### fXp 

## 6?- 3;). 

# ldst 

# /.51**~~( l2.~**  Pretest Post test**~** \1) 

### J"'\ 

# 8.--=tJ 9)1- 

# 55 

# I Plio 

## 3J {)fl1 Il-l 

## IQJ5 .30 .(:1. 

## J&")**~.~f.15** 

## 3 tS 

### I. (p 

### 8-:}'J-- 

## !Q:t I

## 'n'1 

# 5& 31**~~** 

### /.1() 

### -G§ 3.() 

## tJ. Jf,5 

## -0C/DS L/ ;i.O 10.3 

## cHb 

# B<o B5 I

### f)

# ;r.. J-1 

## l'il**1-~5** 

## -§.-Jt.f 

## 3.0 .6J 

### ;JDS 

## 0-Jn5 5' 

### .9S 

### \3."0 

## d11-**~** 

# 55 

# Af- .SY**6~** 

## 1.4/o 

## ejD 1.2 .f) Moisture 

## v 3D \0 ilo.IA4 

## .AD 

# 159 6")**~::r-** 

# y; Q53

### -e-B~ -&'

### ff<, 

## /. 't**pet#~~** Cond# 

## :;.- 

# 10 ( 35

.**~\J.** 

### I 

### ()?{) 

## 81-:' 

# 55 2{p 

## 3:7 J<.((o 

## i.d7-**~-J!.?** 

# lJ.s lnl collected 

### :J 

### YD 

## JJ.'-{ J74 

## 6b 

# t>J5 '07- 35 Olfi /Sf 

# 'ra

# .31 2-'0 Grams collected '<, 

### 45'**~-=l-.** 

### I 

### c9-=A S<f:, 

## 3\J 

## SG? 3')

### IJ~ 

### /.It/) 

## 'e.Jif J.o otal moisture "1 "SD 

## '30.'1 1N'J C)O 

## SLI fFl- 3')

### I~ 

### 1. r()**~.]5** 

# Jc Test Team Personnel 

### 5 55 

### Jt.j' G, 

### 9".7") 

### 6'1 

## <;w**B~** 

## .J5**~~~** 

### 1. 

## &o**~** 

### .'3.J 3-C) Mfter Box .-, Probe (p I..O 

### IOJ1.JID**cn~.t** 

## 2>7 

## Bli**!~}** 

## 35 

## IJ.t. -6). 

# 86 e./$ :I.D 

### !'1X,rh, 

## rBtkl**~ample Bo~#**  

## to ifv1eter Box# 

## lffJJ Meter liH@ 

## 1. 

## 'ill**~eter** Y Factor 

## -G.1A-ol1

emperature Device # 

### \() Probe# 

# L\-a Pitot Cp 

# -e.**n~o** Probe Liner Material (, lcSJ Probe heat setting, )'Sl) Ambient Temperature 

### "1-'1 Fyrite? Orsat? ,_/

### ~02 

## I% C02 

# I leak ./"s §rifice Pitot Pretest Post Test**R~l** S5.7- R ')._3**s~s** Pretest Leak ./GJ-()!}3 CFM@ /() •, Post test Leak 

### 1,1**~**

### / CFM @ 

### 4.{) Notes 

## 3

# + 'Ji-1 f., )'?-:

## 3 

# vc:: Total Total Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.**~,--** GCU( 

### LJI 7-57- '15 

## 7'1- 

## IL/f.ol BS45 

# (S; @ 62 

# I I I

## Particulate Sample Recovery and Integrity Client:



# ~co.\ Stp,\..Q_ Sample Date: 

## g

# I() 1l

## Sbo 1 Source:#

## 3'6 ,\{.l N 

### (,rho.LL"'f Recovery Date: "'\ ;!J

## I;)oo 

### 1 Sampling Personnel:



### L.J(;~, 

# D. 'fx,;/,,t Balance ID:



### ~\\;....,_( 1 I : ' """ Recovery Personnel: 

## L

.

**;1~** BP:

_ **_:o:A~.'1..!.r.!._**

### ____ _ Balance Type: Triple Beam Electronic---"'---- 

### Moisture Data
Run No. 

# \ Run No. 

# J Run No.
__ 

## 3,L.__ Final volume in impingers (ml) 

# e,c,,5 

## f'.i.>. I 

## 11.3 Initial volume in impingers (ml) 

## fr & Net volume increase (ml) 

### 'b'l'.

# 5 ?1., I Silica gel container number



## \~ 

# IL\ Final silica gel weight (g) 

### CJL(z,

# J. 9t..S
. .4 Initial silica gel weight (g) 

### 031..,,5 

## CZ'ft. J Net weight increase (g) 

# n+ IS. Q 

### Cf, 

### I Color of silica gel

**~~**

## :ia..J. 

# ""-''l.d Total moisture 

# /Q

**~.**

### J_ 

## k1Lf.3 7-1 

## y Sample Recovery Run No. Run No. 

### {)__ Run No. 

## __3 Filter Number 

## 303 6:1 JQ3fcJ0 

## JD3J5l/, Filter container number



### ~~\ 

## 'V._v..d Color of material on filter L,.)l,k



### IvA'~-->- Filter container sealed? ./ Probe and filter wash container no. 

### '\(_""" I

**~~~** Liquid level marked? ./ 

### / Acetone



## ~water_ blank no. 

# 'Gh
........-k.- Samples stored and locked?

**~** 

# ---- Sample Chain of Custody
Were all individual sample seals intact? Yes ......-111o _Initials

# 1£.{_ If no. indicate sample n 1 Relinquished

**by7"~L~t;z.:_**______ _

**-7-7"""::--------zf'-7~--** Date
_____Time
____ _ Analyzed by



# --=~:;;f_?~~'::'~~':A5Z'::-Date 

# /!Gtkt Time !/.(V Duplicate analysis by Date 

# '7/i!/cr Time 

## OEXD Comments 63 

### GUAROIAN SYSTEMS 1nc.

**.~.**



# 3136Ltt----- I J1!-P--L_

# ~,J-: ntlr.t! rcw1

# ~**---~i~/~id3~o7£1~5u~~---=30~0~.~l/**____

# ~00ft

# -----~2~1J~0~3~tv~-~~----~~~q]j£ ____

# u6JL.~~~~~~~4-

____

# ~J~I1~C~')~I~~/.3~__

# ~3=u~j·~b~--~~b£,~~~~~c~~4-

# ~- 

# JJ**~---- -~** **JT~** Ll-<---- 

## 1

## -~-~--**1.:--1---~** <-- __

# to_o
___**------,-'~~~--.!!..£.1.':~4--**

### GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

·BlankAnalytical Data

Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Sample location: Outlet Relative humidity: 46% Type of blank: Acetone Liquid level at mark and container sealed: Density of blank: Blank Volume Date & time ofwt.: Date & time of

### wt.:

Concentration of Blank 0.7847 g/ml 200 ml 9-26-01 1100 Gross 

### wt 9-27-01 0800 Gross

### wt. Average Gross

### wt. Tare 

### wt. Weight of blank



## o.oob-o. mg/g

---- Yes

82087.3 82087.3 82087.3 82087.3 0.00 0.0000%. Note: In no case shall a blank residue greater than (0.01mg/g) or 0.001% ofthe weight ofthe blank used be subtracted from the sample weight.
Remarks:

Signature of analyst:

--· ··-- Signature of reviewer: mg mg mg mg mg ofweight



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 66

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Run Number: Sample location: Relative humidity: Density ofAcetone: Outlet 46% 0.7847 g/ml Liquid level at mark and container sealed: Filter marked and container sealed: Acetone rinse container number: Acetone rinse volume: 100 ml 1 Acetone blank residue concentration: Acetone blank weight 0.0000 0.0 Date & time of

### wt.: Date & time of

### wt.: ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 9-26-01 1100 9-27-01 0800 Gross 

### wt. Gross 

### wt. Average Gross

### wt. Tare 

### wt. Less weight ofacetone blank Weight of particulate in acetone rinse PARTICULATE WEIGHT Filter(s) container number: 1 Date & time of

### wt.: Date & time of

### wt.: 9-26-01 9-27-01 1100 Gross 

### wt. 0800 Gross 

### wt. Average Gross 

### wt. Tare 

### wt. Weight of particulate on filter (s) Weight of particulate in acetone rinse TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE Yes Yes mg/g mg 1

81497.1 mg 81497.4 mg 81497.3 mg 81489.2 mg 0.0 mg 8.1 mg

302.4 mg 302.5 mg 302.5 mg 303.4 mg

-0.9 mg



### .__ __!lJ_ mg

7J_mg Note: In no case shall a blank residue greaterthan (0.01 mg/g) or 0.001% ofthe weight ofthe blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. Remarks: Signature of analyst: Signature of reviewer:



### 67 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# -------------------------------------------

GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Sample location: Relative humidity: Density ofAcetone: Outlet 46% 0.7847 Liquid level at mark and container sealed: Filter marked and container sealed: Acetone rinse container number: Acetone rinse volume: 120 Run Number:
g/ml

ml 2 Acetone blank residue concentration: Acetone blank weight 0.0000 0.0 Date & time of wt.: Date & time ofwt.: ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 9-26-01 1100 9-27-01 0800 Gross wt. Gross wt. Average Gross wt. Tare wt. Less weight ofacetone blank Weight of particulate in acetone rinse PARTICULATE WEIGHT Filter(s) container number: 2 Date & time ofwt.: Date & time ofwt.: 9-26-01 9-27-01 1100 Gross wt. 0800 Gross wt. Average Gross wt. Tare wt. Weight of particulate on filter (s) Weight of particulate in acetone rinse TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE Yes Yes mg/g mg**~--** 2

83848.9 83849.0 83849.0 83836.1 0.0 12.9

294.0 294.1 294.1 293.6 0.4 12.9 13.3 Note: In no case shall a blank residue greaterthan (0.01mg/g) or 0.001% ofthe weight ofthe blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. Remarks: Signature of analyst: Signature of reviewer: mg mg mg mg mg mg

mg mg mg mg mg mg mg



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 68

## GUARDIAN* SYSTEMS* INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 190 LEEDS, AL 35094 800-738-5719

Method 5 Analytical Particulate Data Plant: General Shale Products Corp. Run Number: Sample location: Outlet Relative humidity: 46% Density ofAcetone: 0.7847 g/ml Liquid level at mark and container sealed: Filter marked and container sealed: Acetone rinse container number: Acetone rinse volume: 100 ml 3 Yes Yes 3

Acetone blank residue concentration: 0.0000 mg/g Acetone blank weight Date & time ofwt.: Date & time ofwt.: ACETONE RINSE WEIGHT 9-26-01 1100 Gross 

### wt. 9-27-01 0800 Gross

### wt. Average Gross 

### wt. Tare 

### wt. Less weight ofacetone blank Weight of particulate in acetone rinse PARTICULATE WEIGHT Filter(s) container number: 3 Date & time ofwt.: Date & time ofwt.: 9-26-01 9-27-01 1100 Gross 

### wt. 0800 Gross 

### wt. Average Gross

### wt. Tare 

### wt. Weight of particulate on filter (s) Weight ofparticulate in acetone rinse TOTAL WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE 0.0 mg 71301.3 mg 71301.1 mg 71301.2 mg 71294.5 mg 0.0 mg 6.7 mg

302.1 mg 302.0 mg 302.1 mg 302.8 mg

-0.8 mg



### ----**-~z.mg**

___ 6.0_ mg Note: In no case shall a blank residue greaterthan (0.01 mg/g) or 0.001% of the weight ofthe blank used be subtracted from the sample weight. Remarks: Signature of analyst: Signature of reviewer:



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 69

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road P.O. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094 Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Report Date: Receive Date: Receive Time: Page: 1 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26

Control No: 0109-00412 Sample#001 Sampler LK Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00 Sample ID : Run 1 Acid LABORATORY CERTIFICATE PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

- METHOO REFERENCES- {i) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600.14-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination ot Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition. 1992 (3) Test Methods tor Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code ot Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136,**Appen~.** ReVJsed July 1995 (6) Methods tor the Determination ot Organic Compounds in Drink1ng Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.

305 Ashville Road P.O. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094 Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Report Date: Receive Date: Receive Time: Page: 1 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26

Control No : 0109-0041 2 Sample # 002 Sampler : LK Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time:0:00 Sample ID : Run 1 Base LABORATORY CERTIFICATE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by: 

# )7
.. 

# 1'·**.e~ ~** -METHOD REFERENCES- (1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993. May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition. 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chem1cal Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 {4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, AppendiJ

### f-. Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4·88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road P.O. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 321 1 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No : 0109-00412 Sample # 003 Sampler : LK Sample ID : Run 2 Acid LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: 1 Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD



### --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) 57.0 Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved



# by:_...,../7==;;z_..**/j,'--"-='~=~:'?'6="'-'**

# _____ _ 

# J -METHOD REFERENCES- (1) Methods for Chemical Analysis at Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846. 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part i 36,

**Appencf1r'~.** Revised July i 995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4·88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road P.O. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Telephone Wats Fax

Report Date: Receive Date: Receive Time:205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: 1 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26

Control No : 01 09-0041 2 Sample # 004 Sampler LK Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00 Sample ID : Run 2 Base LABORATORY CERTIFICATE PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by:

# ~ 

# 6£-.-...;4 y -METHOD REFERENCES- {1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes,**EPA~S00/4-79-20,** revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th_ Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Part 136, Appenq13A. Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Orgariic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road PO. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No : 0109-00412 Sample # 005 Sampler LK Sample ID : Run 3 Acid LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by:

# ~**~** 

# ?! -METHOD REFERENCES
- (1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, AppendMA, Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991. August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road PO. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson CitY, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No : 01 09-00412 Sample # 006 Sampler LK Sample ID : Run 3 Base LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: 1 Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by: 

# 7

**~** j -METHOD REFERENCES- (1) Methods tor Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods tor the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, Appencf11j'. Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road PO. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No : 01 09-0041 2 Sample # 007 Sampler : LK Sample ID : Blank Acid LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: 1 Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved



# by:~ **~~**

- METHOD REFERENCES
- {1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-20. revised March 1983. August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 18th. Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Part 136.

**Appe~A.** Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039. Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road PO. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No : 0109-00412 Sample # 008 Sampler : LK Sample ID : Blank Base LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by: 

# 1 

# 7

**~** 

# ?

**~METHOD REFERENCES~**  (1) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993. May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 18th. Edition. 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Sdid wastes Physical Chemical Method SW-846, 3rd Edition, Update tV December 1996 (4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136.

**Appen~:syrA.** Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
305 Ashville Road PO. Box 190 Leeds, Alabama 35094

General Shale Products Co. P.O. Box 3547, C.R.S. 3211 Roan St. Johnson City, TN 37601 Attention: Mr. Phil Towles Control No: 0109-00412 Sample # 009 Sampler LK Sample ID : Blank Dl Water LABORATORY CERTIFICATE Telephone Wats Fax 205/699-6647 800/738-5719 205/699-3882

Page: 1 Report Date: 9/28/01 9/24/01 14:26 Receive Date: Receive Time:

Sample Date: 9/21/01 Sample Time: 0:00

PARAMETER RESULTS UNITS ANAL DATE TIME METHOD Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) <30. Total ug LSC 9/25/01 10:00 NIOSH

Approved by:)/



## ~~~::;::,=. ______ _ ./ -METHOD REFERENCES- (1) Methods for Chemical Analysis atWater and Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-20, revised March 1983, August 1993, May 1994 (2) Standard Methods for the Examination ofWater and Waste Water, 18th. Edition, 1992 (3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes Physical Chemical Methcx:l SW-846. 3rd Edition, Update IV December 1996 {4) 1987 ASTM Annual Standards (5) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136, Appenqt8A, Revised July 1995 (6) Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water. EPA-600/4-88/039, Revised July 1991, August 1995

# • VISUAL EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT ·FACILITY NAME.



### bEHa-~ 

### SB+>? LOCATION 

### l-cui svll<- 

# Kv

**~EMISSION** SOURCE.#:

## 3& 1<'.·



## ~~ 

## e.[hou5f

IcoNTROL DEVICE 

## l : ..,.._Stn,,J,J;,..,

## ft.rh.us
..... DRAW NORTH ARROW }

**~** STACK HEIGHT 

## 10' SYMBOLS SUN WINO

. 

## ' DISTANCE FROM SOURCE. )-?Q 0

**~** 

# -co- 'DIRECTION FROM SOURCE.C.} C 

# --- PlUYE & STAC)(

## a.....--

SECONDS :MIN 0 15 I 30 45

0

2 

### 0 0. Cl>'O 

### 0 

### 0 0 0 ' 3

4 

### 0:8) 62 0 

### 0 C) 

## 0 0 5 

### 0 6 

### 'D 

### 6 0 7 

### '5 0 0 8 0 b 0

**C>~** 9 C> 0 

### 0 0 10 

## 0 0 1 

### 0 11 

### 0 0 0 0 12 'C) 0 0 0 13 

### 0 0 0 

## 0 

# v 0 14 

### 0 

### 0 COMMENTS CONDENSED WATER IN 1HE PLut/E.?-Al..JJ__

SECONDS SECONDS 45 MIN ' 0 i 15 

### I MIN 0 15 ; 30 30 45 ; ' 0 ' ., . . 30 

### OO•o'O 45 

### v'o!£2 

## '" : o ,0 : o 

## o 31 0 D ' b 

## o 46 0 :

## 5 ,o , 0 17 

## f>C>ao 32ooos47oooo 18 0 ;

### 0
.0 0 33 () 0 ' 0 I 0 46 I 0 

### 0 , 5 ; 0 -"'9,_,_· =0:_:_·,_O'__;._cCJ..-____,.Oc.,' 34 

### 0 c') <t) a_ 49 i



### ~ 

### 0 

## o C)



### ~20--''--'1!>"'--.__,o~_.oJ.._c_j 35 

### o 

## c o 

## o so 

### o 0 

## o 5

**~''~l.IO:_:_•**=0+"'0--'-'0"'-JI , 36 

### CJ 0 •

### 0 :

## 0 51 : 

## 0 ·Q 

### o o : 

# o o 

# o

**o~** 37 

### D ·

## o ·a :a 52'

## o ,0 

# o o 22

**~23__,0"-c--.,.,_0 ~~**  38 

### 0 '0 0 

### 0 53 

### 0 '

### 0 2___0_

24 

### o · b 

# o

**-~** 

# '-'-'_Q..le 'a 

# o_ 54 :

# o o ·o o

. ' '·

**~!** 25 0

**-~-** 0

**~__Q__J)** .0 lY_

**~** 0 0

**Q_~** 

### o o 

### o o 41 G 0 0 

# o 56 ' 

### o o o 

# a !

**~27_:_6-.-_,_,.0'"'-,..**

## ,.o._

**~** 42 

# o o 

# o G 57 ; 

### 4> 0 

### a 

# o

28 0 0 0 0

**~43** Q Q
. e I (!) I 56 · Q 

## 5 Q 

### 0 26

29 ·

## o o ·o o

**·--~ _~_o_Q_JQ** 

### __ **~~~** 

### .. Q_!?
__ ,<>_

--- .. 

## _______,_... --

---·-------
-

'REDUCTION- HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE (SMAJ

## _M

ALLOWABLE --- '% OPACITY NO SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE=

CERTlFICATlCN EXP!RATlON DATES LECTURE

_ 

### _!f__,3_,Q!j



# S'GNA~ 

# r1:Hz
. TOTAl MINUTES OBSERVED 

### _kj_]__

ALLOWABLE --- '% OPACil'r' NO SMA'S EXCEEDING

**ALLOWABLE~**

FIElD}QJ!i..;QJ CERTIFIED BY 

### (±p£!!11 

### 3'133

OA7'E 

### 9 ,t,J 1 "' 

### ---


### 79 

# •

•

# •

• VISUAL EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT :FACILITY

**NAME;{-)tN~/1\..** 

### Stlftl-" LOCATION;



### Ln **iSI·•'ll~** 

# Kv EMISSION SOURCE;

### Jf

## Jt-'



## kl~ 

## f ,deusf :CONTROL DEVICE;

## L ;,.<

## SoJJ,,r f.u.k
:STACK HEIGHT: DRAW NORTH ARROW

!DISTANCE FROM SOURCE / OBSERVER POSITION :DIRECTION FROM SOURCE:t:

### S 

# e

ICONDITIONS· :wiND DIRECTION FROM: :WIND SPEED:

.AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: isKY COVER: i PLUME BACKGROUND:

,PLUME COLOR

**~CLOCK** TIME: C0N0ENSED WATER IN THE PlUUE?

**~** ATTAC>EI>
I

**~**

**------~S~E~CO~N~D~S~--~ ~----~SE~**  **~CO~~~~---c** SECONDS SECONDS

MIN 0 15 30 45 I MIN Q ; 15 I 30 45 0 15 I 3Q 45 ! PJIN 0 15 30 45 o •

## G •

# o C> 

### c;

1 15 

## o 1 

## o 1 

### o ·c ,o 

### £!1 

## o o e • t) 

### 0
.

### C) () : 16 ' 

### 0 :

# aI 0 0



## c-''.''--"'O:___:_;;;J5L**-LOL_~o~** 2 

### 0 ' ' 0 6 

### iJ

.

### o I 11
. 

## o :o I 

### 0 

### o c-'-"'2---"'0'---_..o<---or..L 0 (2 

## 0 0 ' 16 ; 

### 8 

## i ri

. l'i 

## -o " 0 0 l "

. 0 4 : 

## o 

# o o o 19 

# o • 

# o o o ,. a 

# o 1

# o e f---"-5



### ---;·_J_OJ.___-'0~-'6 

## u 20 ' () 0 

### 8 0 35 

### t) 0 (l_LL

1 • 

# o "'

**~.o** 6 I 0 

### -II 0 0_; 21 0 0 0 36 u 0 0 70000 2201000 370QOQ

**___-_B____c0"---'-f2z.__,..O~-** 23 

### 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 

### 0

**9~{;'='---'-"'** 

### 0,-___ 0 __Q_, 24 (j 0 ' 

### 0 6 39 

# 5 0 •0 f> 10 (} 

### 0 

## 6

**~-- ~fJ._JL**  0 

### 0 40 

### 0 0 0 0 _1_1

**-.-O.___Q__{J___Q~** I 26 Q · () 

### 0 0 41 0 

### 0 0 0

_ 12 · 

# o o o 

# a r- 27 • 

### 0 · 

# o o o 42 

# 5 o o ·

# o ·

**~_Q__Q_fLQ.** ! 28
. 0 

### '0

.0

__ Q__ ., 0 D. 

### 0 0



### ~._~ 

## 0- f?_ 

# ?_._

**_o_~~~ ~~-.D**  -



### -~ 

## -9 

# o

**--~** 

# o COMMENTS 45 

### 0 

## tJoo
46 

### 0 47 () 

### 0 0, 

### 0 46 

### 0 49 I[) 50 

## 5 D 51 

# o.o 52 0 0 53 

### 0 0 54 

### 0 0 55 0 0 56 

### 0 0 57;(!) 

### 0 () 0 

## oo 

# a o 

# oo 5' 0 0 0 0 

### 0 0 0 56 

## o 

## a o a 590060

REDUCTION HIGHEST SIX MINlJTE AVERAGE (SMA)

**~** TOTAl t.INUTE$ OBSERVED f..t.:;::(l

AllOWABLE
____ % OPACJTV NO SW:S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE= **AI..~OWABL£** ---- % OPACITY

**~** sw.·s S<CEEOING AllDWAaE=

CERTl""ICATlON EXPIRATION DATES LECTURE

_ 

### _!j_,J._p 

### t./ ""IELD/D t.!::!__,_QJ_ CERTIFIED 8Y

### AtEI'tt ..3

## v3?



### ~A. SiGNATURE 

# 'ry ,IJq,



### r~ **DA~ 2_,~1r~** 
80 

# •VISUN.. EMISSION OBSERVATION REPORT ,FACILITY NAME 

### GfNet:.AL 

### ,S /4At.G :

! LOCATION: 

## L CUI

## sv.f{_. 

# ry I

IEMISSION souRCE

### #-)8 

### f((vfd1cult !

,CONTROL 08/ICEL;,.,.._

### Xi'l.1fk<v

**&;t~!** / ' :STACK HEIGHT: 70 I I r------- I' ! !<:>ISTANCE FROM SOURCE: 

## c?-'?D

**~·DIRECTION** FROM SOURCLs

### f :CONDITIONS:

**-··---··-~RT** STOP! WINO DIRECTION FROM: ,

## 5 VV C,vJ 1 IWINO SPEED: 

### I0 - IS' I0 -

### ,c;, IAMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 

### '79. 0 

### ;..,q"' 1 isKY coveR: 

### ClD'I 'ln
.. 

## l
iPLUME BACKGROUND:

**,/f.~(!S** rf£E5 I iPLUME COLOR 

## 7fJiTrf?

**~iiJ7fi** SYIBJLS 

## "'"' 0 

# - PlUME & STACK

## a..-- DRAW NORTH ARROW

/ OBSERVER POSITION



# ~4~ v

CONDENSED 'NA.TER IN lHE

**PLUME.?~** ATTACHED 1 IR.< DETACHED

_ **-~__.s,..E,-.c":o'!'No,s,_**__ _ , c_l -,---SE=C:":O'!'NOS,.,__---jl' 1- I SECONDS I 

## I SECONDS I I I ' ' I

**_M_I~** 0 15

__ 30 45

**~-_____Q____j_~~-~** ! MIN 0 15 30 45 

## 0 • ' I I' ' I MIN I 0 15 30 45 i 

### 45'6'05o!

**~** o 

### 0 

## 0 0 1s :

### <1 , 

### o :o :()

1 ' ,. 6 0 : 0 ' 1 I 

## 0 C) 

### 0 I 

## 0

**~** 

## ' 16 ! () '



### ~ 

### i Q i 0



### ~ i 31 

## I 0 0 i 0 0 ' ' (;) '0 i 

### 0 0 

## '6 I 

## · 2: () 

# 0 'D _QJ 

# 111lo_.jo__;.o •o



### ~ 

### f-E-'5

**~** 'o 

# a_

**~o** 

## o 0 

### D

**!~o** 

## :0 i 

### o.

**~** 

### · 33 ·

**~** 

# o o o 48 ,

## o_ o

**~ ~**  1 

### o , '0 0 

### 0 I ' ' ' i I i 4 1

**~** 

# o '_:--'-"--!- 

### c> ,__ 

# a

**_j__Q~ ~**  

## o o J:2.... 49 

### o 0 a> , ,

### 2 

## 0 A 

### 0 ' I I -- 1 ' A 50 

### ,/!\. A ..._ ,'Q i ,_s

**-~-** · v , _ _Q_ 1_2Q
__**~_LL** 

### <' '_Q__J.;_ 35 : 

### o v

**.a___Q~** "" v ,., 8 : 

## o 

# o "0 iJ : 21 

# 'o

**~**

# o i

# o : 36 ',? 

## o 

## o o_ s1 

## o o I (:J • 

### o 

# _.' o o



# -~ 

# o ,6



# ~o 

# ·6 I 

## e> _Q_ 37 

# s o• (f) 

# o , 52 

## e 

## o ? 

# o !

8 

## 0 

## 0 0 :0



## ~' 0 : 6 I 0 

# +o-: :_ 38 0 

### 0 f) 0 I 53 {I ' 

### 0 0 

### 0 ' 

## • c> C)

**or'-~-,'** 24 

# o Oi c2 

### o 39 

## 0 o

**~** 

### o· 

## W" 0 0 o•O



# ~' lS) D ! 

### 0 (j ! 25 

### 0 

# 0: 0 0



# ~ I 40 

# '6 0 (;_ D



# ~ ! 55 0 

### C> 

# 0: 0 !--" 

## o "

**~_o___aj** 26 

## o 

## o •c 

## o 41 C9 

# o I 

## o o : s• 

# o o i 

## a 1 

## a 12 o 

### b I 

### 0 0

# J 21 i 

## o o ;o 

## o i



### ~D D 

## o o i s1 o 

### 0! 0 :a



## :.-.'~ 0 0 1

## 6£j 1 28'0 ojO



## 43 f9 

### o'Q 0 Iss Q 0 O;Q i



### ..



### '~ **~** :



### _{2~--~Ci___Q:&__ 

### _o_~' **~** ·C:>



### _c:l~,.o'----~s•"--'-'0-'__c.Q 1

:;:, • 0 COMMENTS

------------

·-- -- '---------- ---------' ·-- -------------

-------

REDUCTION HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE (SMA)

# w. TOTAL MINLJTES OBSERVED (cC

ALLOWABLE ---"' OPACITY AllOWABLE "' OPACITY NO SMA.'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE"'
__ NO SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE"' ---

CERTlFICATlON EXPIRATION DATES LECTIJRE..:/.._/_1_10 

### lf FIEt.D-/.12._;..!:[_,Q!__ CERTIFIED 

### avA-JJC /)'\ 3'1-33



# S!GNA~Ar:p._,;t(c:u.' ....,. _..e:,__ __ DATE

**~~!_L_E!_**

··----- ---- -------··------ -- ... **-----~-·-----------** ---


### 81 

### I~

# METHOD 6C FIELD DATA Instrumentsetup Data 

### Facility: 

# SnJe:f&v s;:ff-kVE Samplinglocation: 

# /135' l(;;i_ 

# &ocv/ Date(s) oftests : 

# 9-

# ::'9/-o / Data Logger Channel 

# )I AnalyzerManufacturer:----'-lf{p--"'...ecl.r 

## _,f>:..:c-Pr-=------------------- AnalyzerModei#/Serial#: 

# V( fS- 

## t;l V ( 

## t:;r/i 779d{z.._. I 

### RecorderManufacturer: 

## fL tJ iCE 

# fly&,f i/117tr Co9c.22'2- RecorderModei#/Serial#: 

## ,2020Lfr 

## /taZv 

# Y? 0!):

,-,,-.., 

### Anticipated S02 

### Concentration (ppm): 

# U
- ? '- 

### u 

### Calibration Gases Level 0% 40-60% 80-100% 

### Vendor /).,cL 

# /,oc, 

# hoc Conc(ppm) 

### ' 

## :JL/q. { tlc;-2, 0 0 Carrier I 

### gas 

# fV-:J-

**~** 7 

### Container 

# S:> ;4=-(

**~** 

### Type / 

### Cylinder ID# 

# Cc.r8sro 

# C C

# ?-0 t.(lfo Date of 

# - t(5/o3

**R/15/o·~** Expiration Cylinder 

### Z7()CU 

# 170 (8o1J Pres. (psi) /1 

### Signature: 

# j!(tc~:P /

82 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# Method 6C Analyzer Calibration Data

Facility:



# ~etJe]J!-1... Runs:

# --f-f-:=3,.2------ Location: 

# .j/3g' 

# /c/UJ fuAusT Operator: 

# {/07k

# Jt<- Span: 

# o-s-oo i 

### Date:



# ~ja-1 /o; Flow Setting:



# D-~ Manifold Pres:

# 4

Range of Gas Zero Mid High CylinderValue ppm 

# c) ()l(_ '(. '{ 

## '{?/ Analyzer calibration 

# :/'5 -;f 

# '-!51} response, ppm 

# 77 Absolute Difference 

# 7./ 

# s.'f {. 

### )- %ofSpan 

### {.;)-{ 

### Dio'f 

## 6 

# d-'-/ All values must be less than 2% ofspan.



### 83 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## Method 6C System Calibration Bias and Drift Data

Customer: 

# bw'f'AL- SIIIJL--c Run#:

_ 

# ___,/~-- Location: 

# #38 j{j(;J 

## fx-JtAvsr Operator. 

# 7r lor?-, 

# Uc Span: Date: 

# 7,/o-t 

# /o 1 Time: 

## Og4t



# ~o'ftl' ''I Flow Setting:_____,()"-,: 

### "",.t.)L-"-""-=---- Manifold Pressure: 

## f.?.

# f
Response Time (sec) 1.

__ 

# /f-?-~~(,----- 2. 

# (3"").., Ranqe Zero Upscale Analyzer Calibration 

# 77 t.fjlcf Response, ppm 

### Initial System Calibration



# 7-~ 

# '-(L{0 

# 3 Response, ppm 

### Initial !)_ )_ 

# ).lt System Cal. Bias, 

### % Final System Calibration 

# 1-7 l(L/e,

# 5 ReSQonse, ppm 

### Final 

# D.t_{ A.t'-( System Cal. Bias, 

### % Drift,% 

### o'-tY b-()

## lf System Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response
- Analyzer Calibration Response)/Span x 100 Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response- Initial System Calibration Response)/Span X 

### 100 Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias

**is~** 

### 5%. Maximum allowable Drift is Signature: 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 84

# Method 6C System Calibration Bias and Drift Data

Customer: 

### bt;t-Jl<£A< Run#:
____ _ Location: 

## .zl 

## 3 

# 8 /CiCN 

### WfAvSt6perator:--'-z"-'.

**(,.,..r272""-L=--J._,VZ=-~-Span:** 

### "'

- 5c_,--v j/ c(

_ /} 

### Date : 

# z/:2!,/c?l Time: 

### toft -ill'{ Flow Setting:



### _--~. **_,.·,~-...<i_-AJ..L>-<"'----** Manifold Pressure:

___ 

## (;,_.+/_'

__ I Range Zero Upscale Analyzer Calibration 

# 7. ) lf.5t. )_ Response, ppm Initial System Calibration 

# 1. 7 4. L(u 

# '5 Response, ppm Initial ()'



## ~/ 

## ) I 

# Lj System CaL Bias, % Final System Calibration



# ~·6 l{Lfl(

# 7 Response, ppm Final 

# oy_r- 13 System CaL Bias, % Drift,% 

# (),-ao

**D)~** System CaL Bias, % = 

### (System Calibration Response
- Analyzer Calibration Response)/Span x 

### 100 Drift,%= (Final SystemCalibration Response -Initial SystemCalibration Response)/Span X 

### 100 Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is±5%. Maximum allowable

**Dri~**

# _:%- Signature: 

# :;{!A :!--z_'7

85 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# Method 6C System Calibration Bias and Drift Data

Customer: 

## Gtrv&721Jc.- GlfAu;= Location: 

# ;i- 

# .30 

# /?rc& G:-&ztus70perator: 

# T!or"2Je 

# I 

# I . J ?'{ 

### r;-1 Date· 

## q 2f 6( 

### Time· 

## J/1? -t('fb FlowSetting· ) I 

# bt Manifold Pressure: 

### (

Range Zero Upscale Analyzer Calibration 

# 7/ 4St )- Response, ppm Initial 

# (.0 System Calibration 

# cr\.{V 7 Response, ppm I 

### Initial 

### [) 

# '-{)- 

# ;.5 System Cal. Bias, % Final System Calibration

# {0~**4!..(1~** Response, ppm Final 

## D 

# 0 )- ( 9. )--- System Cal. Bias, % Drift,% 

### ('>t.../:.2 t!).{o 

# r Span: 

### 6

- 

# 20<) 

# 6-r/1.

.

System Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response
- Analyzer Calibration Response)/Span x 100 

### Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial SystemCalibration Response)/Span X 

### 100 

### Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is.± 5%. Maximum allowable Drift is+ Signature:

# -----7'-+-'-~-"'~'-/<-(;-=C.'----t...--7.:::..C"""T""________ _**~-** 

### 86 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## METHOD 7E FIELD DATA

# Facility:_--=-k__::_tu----'-j_cf._:_:h:..::_·~____./e-"-/-----------
Date(s)oftests:

## -----'--1_--=CY_--o.:::.--L..(

_____ Data

## LoggerChanne1~_5,:____ _ 0 

### AnalyzerManufacturer:

### _./-"/?t-4:____:·=-:!· '<:.=:1-::.::'"'-""---------------- 

### AnalyzerModel#/Serial#:

## --"1-"'5"-yL'-/'f'-1 

### f-/_o.:__c_!""O-"-c 1

## -=.J_.Y'-'V

__________ _ RecorderManufacturer: 

# M f,_ 

# lfr

# .t.._ {JJi.._ /&:,(<-. RecorderModel#/Serial#: 

# c2t

# :?S,~/;;?oL/(p '-'

# ~ Anticipated 

### NOx Concentration (ppm): 

### 6

- ) "'J 

### Calibration Gases Level 

### 0% 40-60% 80-100% Vendor 

# /30<:- 

# Bvc_ 

# Be:· c__ Conc(ppm) 

## 0 ,-) '-(.'!;. 

## <, 

# :It,(

# 5 Carrier (

### ·~ gas 

# rl .r r 

### Container 

# <)) 

# ;4-0 7 Type Cylinder 10# 

## XC:J)ff,JIDIJ**~C.J1>ic**

# 5 Date of 

# ----- Expiration /l

## -/7-D)- 

## u-7(-J9 Cylinder 

# ?oqo I r;cc 

# I ;5 L)

## 0 Pres. (psi) Signature:

# ?$J~ (/ 

## /

87 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# Method 7E Analyzer Calibration Data

Facility:



# --'~"-',"'•P-'("'"'~:::....::If""~-"""'-~------- Runs:



### /~

## 3 Location: 

## If<>? J,lc.._f/A,.j" Operator:

# __,_/_-_to_n.c_· _li

__Span: 

### 6 - §?N 

### Date:



# ----"Z----"'9'---+-(_--=o~{ __ Flow Setting:



# ----"'@""--""e~::pp'-1..-- Manifold Pres:

# #-

Range of Gas Zero Mid High CylinderValue ppm 

# D :7-'Lrl' 

# 'I(/r. 

# 5 Analyzer calibration 

# /. 7 )"7J..f



# 471.~ response, ppm Absolute Difference 

# 1-7 Li. I 

# l.

**~** %ofSpan 

## 0 

## "3-( t:J-<&r 

## 03<p All values must be less than 2% ofspan.



### 88 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc

## Method 7E System Calibration Bias and Drift Data
Customer:

__ 0,_se'-'· 

### =..fwwu)"'-"""'--.



# -~----'1d--=-·_,_-L_· _________

### Run#:_---'/

__ Location: 

# /2. ?, 

# t:/,,

**{3,J..~..r** Operator: 

# f:Cdcf/[ Span: 

## t -Sc-

### o G
. 

### 31
.

**~'{** 

### . Date: I 

### ifi-0( T1me: 

## Or 

# 't' -C9<16 FlowSettlng:---'./t"-·-=-'-'=C"-t-4-b"------ Manifold Pressure: { { Response Time (sec) 

## 1·----rt"":r--"7'---- 2.
___ 

# g""--'3=----- Range Zero Upscale Analyzer Calibration 

# 7 t(?f) 

# I

. **~·-_L** 

### Response, ppm ,7'//.'-f 

### Initial System Calibration 

## d,L/ 

# '-17(.

**~** Response, ppm 

### Initial 

# o.L-{

**[ro~** System CaL Bias, % 

### Final System Calibration 

# \D

**4~'J.S** Response, ppm 

### Final 

# D

**i~** 

# I. 

# 7 System CaL Bias. % Drift,% 

# or& I.

# rt System CaL Bias. 

### % = (System Calibration Response
- Analyzer Calibration Response)/Span x 

### 100 Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -Initial System Calibration Response)/Span X 

### 100 Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is 

### :t5%. 

### M"im"m•llow•ble Dcift



# ~ Signature:



# ~L_ 89 GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# Method 7E System Calibration Bias and Drift Data

Customer:

__ 

# b_~--"·"'-'~=--'-~-'--"'-"-/_,z_-=----------Run#:
__ __)_
_ _ Location: 

## #!;<{



## /!~;-..&/;a:/ Operator:



## rf-t.~l~ 7)(_ S c) .....,.-,. ' 

### pan:__ **~-=-----** 6' 

### Date:



## t(~.)'-u( Time: 

## /cit :rt_ 

## /Iff Manifold Pressure:
___ ,_· 

# _L{_,___ Fiow Setting:



## ---'~='...::Cc::;'S;z...;/.:.:J.t.A--::=-__
Range Zero Upscale Analyzer Calibration 

# I 

# 7 l/7(] Response, ppm Initial System Calibration (. 0



## L((~'{ Response, ppm Initial 

# 6tlf 

# ;. 7 System Cal. Bias, % Final System Calibration 

# /, )

**'-i~).**

# i Response, ppm Final 

# /.l9S System Cal. Bias, % 

## D. 

## u Drift,% ID.{Lj 

## bb-;rSystem Cal. Bias, % = (System Calibration Response
- Analyzer Calibration Response)/Span x 100 Drift,%= (Final System Calibration Response -InitialSystem Calibration Response)/Span X 

### 100 Maximum allowable System Calibration Bias is 

### :t5%.



### 90 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

### INTEGRATED BAG SAMPLE FIELD DATA
Plant 

# 0-enevcJ Skle

. Location 

# # :S

## 8' 

# f1,\,.,_ td""''-'

# :J= Date 

# -"-fh- Sfz..t

# /o l Fj Barometric Pressure, in. Hg. 

## zs 

# 7 + Sample Bag Leak Checked .____.----

**~** Operator 

## /0?!1,,.:1 

# Liz )r. Sample Train Leak Checked

__ .t...::::_ ___ _

Run# I Bag ID# 

# P.wv,P \ Run# I Bag JD#

**~;s;.\** '(__ Run# I Bag ID# f)...v.-

### .J1 

## .3 TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. TIME Traverse FLOW % DEV. Point 

# »1m Point 

# .!lE Point



# 1;/~ **~**



### (')~<fLIA- I



### I;;~ 

## I ,,_n 

### /0/f_ /A 

## I "...,

**~** t) /) 

## ill./<: 

## It- I

**/o.~** 

## Itl." 

## ' 

## I I I 7 

# '

**~** '? 

## I

**~** 

## I I '· 

## I !L

**~** 

## I 

## I 4-- ,.,.-

**~** 

## I 1n 

## I I 

# '· I 1 

## I 

## I,) I 

## I I A- I 

## I 

# 1£ i 

## r 7 

## I ' 

### 2 

## I
7 

## I I I

**~** ? 

## I I I 

## I I 

## I 1.; 4 

## I I I<" 

## I I ('

**~**



### /(~Cl<lY> 

## I I 

## I ' 

## 1\J

**Ill~** 

## I 1. \ I l7li:f-l

**~** 

# v I\\/ I I 

## I I I I I 

## I

- __ _!__
____ 

## I 

## l I I I I 

## I 

## I I I 

## I 

## I I 

## I I 

## I I I 

## I 

# T I I I I 

## I I I 

## I I I I I 

## I I I I I 

## l I 

## I I I I I I I 

## I I I I 

## I I I I I 

## I I I I I 

## I I 

## i I I I I I I 

## I I I 

## I I I I I I 

## I I I I 

## I I I 

## I I 

## I I I I I I I 

## I 

## I I I 

## I I I I A•terase [ ().

# ) I 

# o u Average 

## I o) 

## I

**c~.o** 

# I Averase j 

### ;J, ') f 0 , (_)

**GUA~DIAN** 

### sYSTEMS 1nc 92- 

### -------------------------- 

# /' 

# ' DRY MOLECULARWEIGHT DETERMINATION '!ant 

### G,Q_I-...)e__lal



# SI-B.~ Time ofAnalysis /C 

### ·co

**l£31~** (_]tJG 

### .::>ource 

## 1P- "'S 

# K.i N 

## p()hAuft Orsat I Fyrite 10 

### # 

## >fl4,rS '2 Sample

**Type(~lntegrated, ~)** 

### __ 

## ~ Fyrite Leak Check 

# 7() Analytical Method 

# 02S);/ Date 

### 0 

# /d.d .:r (.l 

### I

Run

## _I 1 2 3 Average Net Multiplier Molecular 

# I Actual Volume Weight Actual Net Actual Net Net 

## co, 

# I

**3.~v** 

# I

**3-~** 

# I JL- 0,_[,.. 

# I 3-i"" 

## 3lc 

# I 3. 

## Lo 

# I 0.44 

# I'·sp,v o, IS l<· 

# I \L,.r 

## Is l.., IL.,.D \Q 

## -lr 

# I ll.-(1 

## lie-D 

# I 0.32 

# Is-- I.Jo 

## co 

# I I I 0.28 

# I N, 

# I 'Co.y 0.28 

## GJ.SJJ COMMENTS: TOTAL 

# lA. d

## tLP Run_j_ 

### 1 

# I 2 3 Average Net Multiplier Molecular Volume Weight Actual Net Actual Net Actual Net 

## co, 

## 3.tc j- (_, 

### 3LP 

# I 3.(_, 

# 3G 3.lo 

## 3L- 0.44 

# IJ. 5bl-1 o, )Ci,_r.



### l~.d- 

### l

## c, .'[\ ll·. 

## d \Ci c, 

# I 11c. ; 

# I \{,, J. 

# I 0.32 

# I5, /'OU

**-c~** 

## co 

## I 

# I I 0.28 

# I N, 

# I ft_---,_J_ 

# I 0.28 

## [;zJ.45(c COMMENTS: TOTAL 

# (;2<; ,J)Lf
Run_3 

### 1 

# I 2 3 Average Net Multiplier

**~\-Jolec:.Jlar** 

# I Actual 

# I Actual 

# I Volume Weight Actual Net Net Net 

# I co, 3



# -~ I 3 

# t:} 

# I:s.0, 

# I3 

## f'.· 

# I

# 3o I 3

# e I 

# JS I 0.44 

## IJ.t...-=+:J 

# I o,



## L~o[, 

# l,{c 

# a I.lb 

## o 

# l,r,...)

**I~Jb** 

# I ltc.J 

# I \L

**~** 

# I 0.32 

### 1'5./f:l/ 

## co 

# I 

# I I 

# I I 

# I I 0.23 

# I I I N, 

# I I I I 

# I I I f';o 

# c 

# I 

# ln,%c I 0.23 

## I COMMENTS: ;} 

### ' ;) 

# I 

# I TOTAL 

# 1A.

**~!}(,_-** 

# I ALYST (Signat1.1re/Oate) 

# ill;

**~cr;-**

# 1-- I Cf-2/-c/ I v



### '-~! 

# I GUAJ:lDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 93

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust S02 NOx TIME GENKY.DAT 09/21/01 12:19:56 ppm ppm


## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust S02 NOx TIME ppm ppm CALIBRATIONS 09121/01 05:30:54 -55.387 1.6682 09/21/01 05:35:12 -53.084 472.35 09/21/01 05:35:17 -52.751 471.26 09121/01 06:40:20 -38.738 254.07 09/21/01 06:40:22 -38.443 253.75 09/21/01 06:40:29 -38.619 252.42 09/21/01 07:26:22 9.842 471.57 09/21/01 07:26:23 9.591 462.13 09121/01 07:26:26 9.6881 460.3 09/21/01 07:29:21 10.325 2.3596 09121/01 07:37:24 7.7254 0.32023 09/21/01 07:39:56 451.18 -0.12776 09/21/01 07:42:31 252.77 1.6725 09121/01 07:47:28 7.643 0.2376 09121/01 08:06:41 440.25 -0.34519 RUN 1 09/21/01 08:46:34 329.09 49.589 09121/01 08:47:04 329.74 51.05 09/21/01 08:47:34 331.9 47.006 09/21/01 08:48:04 339.45 47.445 09121/01 08:48:35 345.28 49.594 09/21/01 08:49:04 342.48 49.685 09/21/01 08:49:34 297.14 42.588 09/21/01 08:50:04 251.15 35.256 09/21/01 08:50:34 239.6 31.991 09121/01 08:51:04 235.5 30.816 09/21/01 08:51:34 235.82 30.373 09/21/01 08:52:04 244.16 30.863 09/21/01 08:52:34 250.4 30.003 09121/01 08:53:04 249.21 30.203 

### 94 

### GUARDIAN SVSTEMS•nc

# r General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09/21/01 08:53:34 09/21/01 08:54:05 09/21/01 08:54:34 09/21/01 08:55:04 09/21/01 08:55:34 09/21/01 08:56:04 09/21/01 08:56:34 09/21/01 08:57:04 09/21/01 08:57:34 09/21/01 08:58:05 09/21/01 08:58:34 09/21/01 08:59:04 09/21/01 08:59:34 09/21/01 09:00:04 09/21/01 09:00:34 09/21/01 09:01:04 09/21/01 09:01:34 09/21/01 09:02:05 09/21/01 09:02:34 09/21/01 09:03:04 09/21/01 09:03:35 09/21/01 09:04:04 09/21/01 09:04:34 09/21/01 09:05:04 09/21/01 09:05:34 09/21/01 09:06:05 09/21/01 09:06:34 09/21/01 09:07:04 09/21/01 09:07:35 09/21/01 09:08:05 09/21/01 09:08:35 09/21/01 09:09:05 09/21/01 09:09:35 09/21/01 09;10:05 09/21/01 09:10:35 09/21/01 09:11:05 09/21/01 09:11:35 09/21/01 09:12:05 09/21/01 09:12:35 09/21/01 09:13:05 09/21/01 09:13:35 09/21/01 09:14:05 09/21/01 09:14:35 09/21/01 09:15:05 09/21/01 09:15:35
95 502 NOx ppm

250.72 256.87 301.35 313.87 295.41

289.8 275.66

288.5 301.02 298.11 289.26 290.99

295.2 297.79 296.06 300.16 303.51 314.52 316.57 313.26 310.09 311.53 316.79 319.27 322.07 325.42 334.38 346.79 346.15 346.15 342.58 342.04 347.66 347.23 332.98 317.54 317.76

319.7 319.38 312.14 313.76 322.51

318.3 317.22 311.71 ppm 31.186 32.308 36.583 39.518 42.488 44.593 45.876 45.667 46.815 47.898 49.859 49.328 46.384 46.641 48.867 49.293 48.189 45.789 47.737 49.733

50.95 47.911 46.984

49.42 51.694 50.811 47.241 48.359 49.272

50.65 49.437 47.124 48.137 49.759

49.08 46.089 43.545 45.001 46.245 47.371 44.554 43.936 45.806

46.78 47.184 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09121/01 09:16:35 09/21/01 09:17:05 09/21/01 09:17:35 09121/01 09:18:05 09/21/01 09:18:35 09121/01 09:19:05 09/21/01 09:19:35 09121/01 09:20:05 09/21/01 09:20:35 09121/01 09:21:05 09121/01 09:21:35 09/21/01 09:22:05 09121/01 09:22:35 09/21/01 09:23:05 09/21/01 09:23:35 09121/01 09:24:05 09121/01 09:24:35 09121/01 09:25:05 09121/01 09:25:35 09/21/01 09:26:05 09121/01 09:26:35 09121/01 09:27:05 09/21/01 09:27:35 09121/01 09:28:05 09/21/01 09:28:35 09121/01 09:29:05 09/21/01 09:29:35 09/21/01 09:30:05 09/21/01 09:30:35 09121/01 09:31:05 09/21/01 09:31:35 09/21/01 09:32:05 09/21/01 09:32:35 09/21/01 09:33:05 09121/01 09:33:35 09/21/01 09:34:05 09121/01 09:34:35 09/21/01 09:35:05 09/21/01 09:35:35 09/21/01 09:36:05 09/21/01 09:36:35 09121/01 09:37:05 09/21/01 09:37:35 09/21/01 09:38:05 09/21/01 09:38:35
96 502 NOx ppm

241.55 117.94 69.517 52.091

44.22 150.07 248.99 285.59 298.33

313.9 315.17 314.95

314.3 323.26 328.12 324.99

311.6 312.36 319.92 324.56 327.58 332.44 341.07 351.11 352.84 352.95 347.98 351.44 357.91 356.73 345.39 325.85 325.85 328.55 324.45 314.41 307.29 316.39 321.64 322.43 320.78 324.56 319.05 316.25 313.65 ppm 45.23 43.9555 41.0596 40.28535

35.8515

36.365 44.067 46.663 45.071 44.054 45.115

46.55 46.876 43.397 45.323 46.119 47.876 46.745 44.941 47.032 50.068

50.35 47.754 47.789

49.02 50.894 50.585 47.015 48.124

49.65 50.65 49.25 46.493 48.002 49.494 49.672 48.045 46.585 48.241 50.316 50.946 47.967 48.141 49.567 49.528 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09/21/01 09:39:35 09/21/01 09:40:05 09/21/01 09:40:35 09/21/01 09:41:05 09/21/01 09:41:35 09/21/01 09:42:05 09/21/01 09:42:35 09/21/01 09:43:05 09/21/01 09:43:35 09/21/01 09:44:05 09/21/01 09:44:35 09/21/01 09:45:05 09/21/01 09:45:35 09/21/01 09:46:05

09/21/01 09:46:35 09/21/01 09:51:37 09/21/01 09:52:16 09/21/01 09:55:09 09/21/01 09:55:11 09/21/01 09:55:13 09/21/01 09:58:10

09/21/01 10:18:31 09/21/01 10:19:01 09/21/01 10:19:31 09/21/01 10:20:01 09/21/01 10:20:31 09/21/0110:21:01 09/21/01 10:21:31 09/21/01 10:22:01 09/21/01 10:22:31 09/21/01 10:23:01 09/21/01 10:23:31 09/21/01 10:24:01 09/21/01 10:24:31 09/21/01 10:25:01 09/21/01 10:25:31 09/21/01 10:26:01 09/21/01 10:26:31 09/21/01 10:27:01 502 

### ppm

313.58 317.54 312.04 310.74 308.58 313.33 314.73 311.93 309.66 314.52 320.27 324.45 319.27 316.25

318.73

436.5 440.49 42.578 42.265 41.844 9.6797 RUN 2

97 263.6 262.49 249.97 245.97 252.99 259.68 256.77 252.37

253.1 263.06 268.35

268.1 264.86 267.99 267.88 264.65 260.22 260.22 NOx 

### ppm

46.733 48.606 49.937 50.576 49.641 48.302

49.25 50.95 50.907 48.563 49.646 50.202 51.385 51.868

49.067 -0.3017 42.823 462.82 460.52 460 0.96388

42.775 45.006 45.889 47.115 46.419 48.063 48.885 49.646 47.611 47.085 48.646 50.376 50.346 47.998 48.028

48.95 48.919 48.419 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# ( General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

.TIME 09/21/0110:28:01 09/21/01 10:28:31 09/21/0110:29:01 09/21/0110:29:31 09/21/0110:30:01 09/21/01 10:30:31 09/21/0110:31:01 09/21/01 10:31:31 09/21/0110:32:01 09/21/0110:32:31 09/21/0110:33:01 09/21/0110:33:31 09/21/01 10:34:01 09/21/0110:34:31 09/21/01 10:35:01 09/21/0110:35:31 09/21/0110:36:01 09/21/01 10:36:31 09/21/01 10:37:01 09/21/01 10:37:31 09/21/01 10:38:01 09/21/01 10:38:31 09/21/01 10:39:01 09/21/01 10:39:31 09/21/0110:40:01 09/21/01 10:40:31 09/21/01 10:41:01 09/21/0110:41:31 09/21/01 10:42:01 09/21/0110:42:31 09/21/01 10:43:01 09/21/0110:43:31 09/21/01 10:44:01 09/21/0110:44:31 09/21/01 10:45:01 09/21/01 10:45:31 09/21/01 10:46:01 09/21/01 10:46:31 09/21/0110:47:01 09/21/01 10:47:31 09/21/0110:48:01 09/21/01 10:48:31 09/21/01 10:49:01 09/21/01 10:49:31 09/21/01 10:50:01


### 98 502 NOx ppm

273.28 277.71 280.73 279.22 282.24

285.8 286.24

287.1 293.36 299.87 300.05 298.54 298.54 301.24 304.48

292.5 269.83 257.09 264.43 267.48 264.43 265.29 263.46 268.64 267.35 264.97 267.78 269.83 277.06 272.96 270.61 267.24 272.09 274.36 258.93 260.33 270.58 272.23 270.26 266.91 258.82 261.95 274.36 274.47 276.09 ppm 48.428 49.698

48.95 47.998 47.932 49.663 49.785 49.541 47.754 48.859 49.711 50.189 49.067 46.945

47.35 47.68 46.91 46.071 44.923 45.541 46.293 46.876 45.175 44.671 45.219 46.645

46.75 44.614 44.914 46.432 46.772 45.954 43.901

45.11 46.945 48.624 46.506 45.397

46.35 46.689 46.728 44.871 45.728 47.493 47.619 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09/21/01 10:51:01 09/21/01 10:51:31 09/21/01 10:52:01 09/21/01 10:52:31 09/21/01 10:53:01 09/21/0110:53:31 09/21/01 10:54:01 09/21/01 10:54:31 09/21/0110:55:01 09/21/01 10:55:31 09/21/01 10:56:01 09/21/01 10:56:31 09/21/0110:57:01 09/21/01 10:57:31 09/21/01 10:58:01 09/21/01 10:58:31 09121/01 10:59:01 09/21/01 10:59:31 09/21/01 11.:00:01 09/21/01 11:00:31 09/21/01 11:01:01 09/21/01 11:01:31 09121/0111:02:01 09/21/01 11:02:31 09/21/01 11:03:01 09/21/01 11:03:31 09/21/01 11:04:01 09/21/01 11:04:31 09/21/0111:05:01 09/21/01 11:05:31 09/21/01 11:06:01 09/21/01 11:06:31 09/21/01 11:07:01 09/21/01 11:07:31 09/21/01 11:08:01 09/21/01 11:08:31 09/21/01 11:09:01 09/21/01 11:09:31 09121/0111:10:01 09/21/0111:10:31 09/21/01 11:11:01 09/21/0111:11:31 09/21/01 11:12:01 09/21/01 11:12:31 09/21/0111:13:01


### 99 802 NOx ppm

284.94 293.04 293.14 288.97 290.12 304.91 313.65 312.58

311.1 308.69 314.09

308.9 296.6 283.54 285.05 285.16 284.94 282.67 279.11 280.08 280.76 280.51 280.84 278.03 288.83 290.55 286.88 285.48 286.56 287.56 291.31 291.42 297.68 304.51 302.75 298.22

295.2 291.96 295.41

294.9 296.28 293.79 303.08 306.64 305.45 ppm 46.223 47.371 49.067 49.381 48.024 47.798 50.054 51.407 51.034 48.137 48.511 49.659 49.646 49.215

47.01 48.554

50.05 50.846 49.285 47.002 49.351 50.011 50.772 48.519 48.241 50.459 50.955 50.472 47.967 48.459 49.498 51.337 50.607 49.781 50.054 51.885 52.485 49.376 48.885 50.033

50.95 5212 49.146 49.598 51.707 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust 502 NOx TIME ppm ppm 09/21/01 11:14:01 303.08 51.955 09/21/0111:14:31 310.23 48.524 09/21/01 11:15:01 322.07 49.05 09/21/01 11:15:31 327.58 50.294 09/21/0111:16:01 327.51 52.017 09/21/01 11:16:31 329.63 50.25 09/21/0111:17:01 339.89 49.063 09/21/0111:17:31 337.73 49.867 09/21/01 11:18:01 320.46 48.915

09/21/0111:18:31 296.71 47.354 09/21/01 11:19:01 295.52 44.667 09/21/01 11:19:31 304.48 44.401 09/21/0111:32:13 444.27 1.7331 09/21/01 11:32:43 444.7 21.228 09/21/01 11:38:42 9.7938 462.87 RUN 3 09/21/01 11:47:24 317.47 47.333 09/21/0111:47:54 313.11 46.363 09/21/01 11:48:24 318.44 44.745 09/21/01 11:48:54 324.23 46.623 09/21/01 11:49:24 324.48 48.163 09/21/01 11:49:54 319.48 48.385 09/21/0111:50:24 320.02 46.097 09/21/01 11:50:54 333.41 45.797 09/21/0111:51:24 336.76 47.206 09/21/0111:51:54 335.14 47.993 09/21/0111:52:24 335.57 47.78 09/21/01 11:52:54 339.24 45.789 09/21/01 11 :53:24 343.56 45.871 09/21/0111:53:54 345.82 47.954 09/21/0111:54:24 351.11 49.046 09/21/01 11:54:54 354.03 48.106 09/21/0111:55:24 359.53 47.063 09/21/01 11:55:54 370.43 48.554 09/21/01 11:56:24 367.09 49.133 09/21/0111:56:54 364.5 48.967 09/21/01 11:57:24 364.93 46.689 09/21/01 11:57:54 377.38 46.467 09/21/0111:58:24 378.75 46.793 09/21/01 11:58:54 377.56 49.167 

### GUARDIAN 100 

### SYSTEMSInc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09/21/0111:59:54 09/21/01 12:00:24 09/21/01 12:00:54 09/21/0112:01:24 09/21/01 12:01:54 09/21/01 12:02:24 09/21/01 12:02:54 09/21/01 12:03:24 09/21/01 12:03:54 09/21/01 12:04:24 09/21/01 12:04:54 09/21/01 12:05:24 09/21/01 12:05:54 09/21/01 12:06:24 09/21/01 12:06:54 09/21/01 12:07:24 09/21/01 12:07:54 09/21/01 12:08:24 09/21/01 12:08:54 09/21/01 12:09:24 09/21/01 12:09:54 09/21/01 12:10:24 09/21/01 12:10:54 09/21/01 12:11:24 09/21/0112:11:54 09/21/01 12:12:24 09/21/01 12:12:54 09/21/01 12:13:24 09/21101 12:13:54 09/21/01 12:14:24 09/21101 12:14:54 09/21101 12:15:24 09/21/01 12:15:54 09/21101 12:16:24 09/21/01 12:16:54 09/21/01 12:17:24 09/21101 12:17:54 09/21/01 12:18:24 09/21/01 12:18:54 09/21101 12:19:24 09/21/01 12:19:54 09/21/01 12:20:24 09/21/01 12:20:54 09/21/01 12:21:24 09/21/0112:21:54
101 502 NOx ppm

369.03 369.36 351.54 338.05

334.6 342.26 351.33 348.52 344.42 344.85 348.74 342.91 338.59 336.86 341.22 347.12 347.12 341.86 339.02 341.72

342.3 336.47 338.81 338.05 348.31

350.9 348.31

341.4 342.15

346.9 348.31 348.85 350.68 353.92 359.42 361.58 363.42 362.34 373.67 377.24 371.84

367.3 372.05 378.64 366.26 ppm 47.241

46.61 45.271 44.575 44.123 42.497 43.727 45.141 45.797 44.928 43.697 43.371 44.462 44.923 44.014 42.318 44.488 45.106 45.349 42.897 42.958

44.51 45.232 43.514 43.219 44.332 45.336 45.884 44.032 43.323

44.14 45.819 46.384 45.984 46.554 47.228 48.419 47.389 45.876 47.902 48.698

49.05 47.584 47.719 47.541 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust

TIME 09/21/01 12:22:54 09/21/01 12:23:24 09/21/01 12:23:54 09/21/0112:24:24 09/21/01 12:24:54 09/21/01 12:25:24 09/21/01 12:25:54 09/21/01 12:26:24 09/21/0112:26:54 09/21/01 12:27:24 09/21/01 12:27:54 09/21/01 12:28:24 09/21/01 12:28:54 09/21/01 12:29:24 09/21/01 12:29:54 09/21/01 12:30:24 09/21/01 12:30:54 09/21/01 12:31:24 09/21/01 12:31:54 09/21/01 12:32:24 09/21/01 12:32:54 09/21/01 12:33:24 09/21/0112:33:54 09/21/01 12:34:24 09/21/01 12:34:54 09/21/01 12:35:24 09/21/01 12:35:54 09/21/01 12:36:24 09/21/01 12:36:54 09/21/01 12:37:24 09/21/01 12:37:54 09/21/01 12:38:24 09/21/01 12:38:54 09/21/01 12:39:24 09/21/01 12:39:54 09/21/01 1:1:40:24 09/21/01 12:40:54 09/21/01 12:41:24 09/21/01 12:41:54 09/21/01 12:42:24 09/21/01 12:42:54 09/21/01 12:43:24 09/21/01 12:43:54 09/21/01 12:44:24 09/21/01 12:44:54
102 502 ppm

338.91 335.28 342.37 341.29 340.53 333.98 340.75 332.98 327.04 317.03 319.38

327.9 333.3 333.52 336.68

337.3 342.58

337.3 334.16 330.49 338.48 343.77

341.5 334.27 332.44 339.45 339.78 336.86

333.3 337.51 345.07 345.39 345.07 346.36 351.44 351.11 346.04 346.25 347.33 353.49 353.38 335.14 329.52 325.35 328.44 NOx ppm

47.315 45.076 45.976 47.832

49.38 48.998 46.432 47.284 48.511

49.02 47.119 45.306 46.541 48.502 49.929 46.637 47.393 48.867 49.507 48.946 47.197 47.845 49.607 50.681

49.02 47.445 48.228 49.393 51.059 48.906 48.285 49.767 51.911 50.594 48.267 49.293 50.281 50.581 50.228 48.741 48.402 48.132 46.145 45.615 44.136 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

## General Shale Louisville, Kentucky #38 Kiln Exhaust
TIME 09/21/01 12:45:54 09/21/01 12:46:24 09/21/01 12:46:54

09/21/01 12:47:24 09/21/01 12:47:54 09/21/01 12:48:24 09/21/01 12:48:54 09/21/01 12:49:24 09/21/01 12:49:54 09/21/01 12:50:24 09/21/01 12:50:54 09/21/01 12:51:24 09/21/01 12:51:54 09/21/01 12:52:24 09/21/01 12:55:14 09/21/01 13:00:26 09/21/01 13:03:49 09/21/01 13:18:59

103 502 ppm

325.53 324.13 328.88

329.85

326.5 322.94 318.84 319.48 324.45 325.31 320.13 315.09 320.17 -809.69 47.941 441.62 48.517

10.79 NOx ppm

47.263

47.35 44.645

46.515 47.767 48.493 47.637 45.336

46.45 48.393

49.25 47.307 46.302 52.646 467.57 1.97329 -1.2529 -2.8166



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc

# VI. CALlBRATIONS

Meter Box The meter box is initially calibrated every 6 months at fixed settings using a set of calibrated orifices. Upon return to the laboratory from this testthe meterboxwas recalibrated using the average meter pressure forthe test series. The recalibration pointshall be the closest point to the initial calibration (for an average meter pressure of 1.494 a 2.0 "H2

### 0 was used as the recalibration point). These recalibrations produced a single point MCF and a**~H@** 

### which shall be compared to the original average calibration to see ifthey are within the 5% allowed at the highest vacuum seen. These recalibration sheets are located behind the original calibration sheets

Pitot Tubes The S type tubes are calibrated against a standard pitot tube (Cp=0.99) in a wind tunnelwith a capacityto generate atestsectionvelocityofapproximately3000feet/minute every 6 months. Additionally the pitot tube is measured as to its specifications and alignment. Upon return, the intercomponent spacings and the face opening alignment of the pitottube assemblywere rechecked and ifno changes are noticed; itshall be assumed that the coefficient ofthe assembly had not changed. Temperature Measurements All temperature devices (impinger, meter box, hot box and stack) are calibrated every 6 months against an ASTM mercury-in-glass reference thermometeror a reference thermocouple and potentiometercalibrated byfixed points, e.g., ice bath and boilingwater (corrected to barometric pressure). Upon return the stack temperature device was recalibrated within 10% of the average absolute stack temperature. Ifthe device being tested agrees within 1.5% ofthe reference device, the temperature datataken in the field shall be considered valid.



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### enc 105

# V. PLANT OPERATIONAL DATA

The following information was supplied by Mr. Phil Towles of General Shale Products Corporationforthe emission tests on the#38Tunnel Kiln on September.21, 2001



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 106

# \ GUARDIAN SYSTEMS PARTICULATE FIELD QA/QC DATA (to be filled out on test site)
cuENT.

# ~uecal 

# ShaJ.e DATE: 

# 9/Jji@J SOURCETESTED:#

# 38

# j{;}N 

# erfau;t 1YPE CONTROL DEVICE:

# L !m-e 

## $Ciubbet 

# t ¥uee__ TEST METHOD USED: 

### c2(o

# A**CONTROLAGEN1CY::~~~~~~.**

1. Was Calibration 2. Was orifice leak

## :/::

.. Whatwas leak 3.
4. Was previous source used to determine K factor? 5.

# ::~~l~~

# ........ 6. 

## en1air1tai11ed at 248 ± 25' F? }
7. 8. Were gas sampling bags leak checked? 9. Were sample containers labeled and levels marked? 10. Were sample bottles stored in a secured container? 11
. Was sample recovery performed on site? List filter #'s 1. 

### 30J 

### !51 2. 30J

### /0le 3. 

### 30

## ltS

### 3

Additional comments:

GUAI=lDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 1071.

2.

3.

4 

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS PARTICULATE FIELD QA/QC DATA

Pitot leak c.'leck.

Nozzle

Ambient

## o, Ambient

## co,

Probe;; TemperattJre

**Device~** Hot Box# Nozzle I 0 # Condenser# (continued)

Run 1 R 

## 4-le ts 3,(, '5.1 /g 

### 4.,;) ' 

## tsS-+



# \D oost-test R 

### S 

### Its y,J 

## R/o.lts5.f.. R

**s.~,**

### s'-15

CFM Ci=,'.! 

### INc:-;::s -"· INC:-:ES INC:-i::S

0/ 

### ,, 

## " 

## ,,

GUAf=iDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc 108 

### .

# VI. CALlBRATIONS Continued

Barometric Pressure An aneroid barometer capable of measuring atmospheric pressure to within 0.1 inches Hg was used. If this device is defective the following alternate method shall be used. The barometric reading may be obtained from a nearby national weather service station, in which case the station value (which is the absolute barometric pressure) shall be requested and an adjustmentforelevationdifferences betweentheweatherstation and sampling point shall be applied at a rate of minus 0.1 inches Hg per 100 feet elevation increase orvice versa for elevation decrease. Specific Test Equipment and Measurements The equipment used during these tests was as follows: Location: Exhaust Probe: 4-2 Meter Box: 1000 Stack Temp: 

## n 10 Sample Box: #10 

### 	 lmpinger #7 Avg. Temp: 271 Rec. Temp: 250 The Omega 10 was recalibrated 

### at the recalibration temperatures indicated. The temperature devices agreed exactlywith its initial calibration values. The intercomponent spacing and the face opening alignment ofthe Pitot Tube assembly was rechecked and no changes were noticed; therefore, it was assumed that the coefficient ofthe assembly had not changed.



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1nc 

### 109

# TypeA Glass Fiber Filters FEATURES • High tensile strength. • Excellent handling characteristics. • Good wetting properties. • Minimum of 99.9% retention_for particles of .3 I'm as determined by DOP tests. • Binderfree. This is the original glass fiber filter pioneered by Gelman Instrument Company over 15 years ago. It continues to be widely used for high volume sampling. Since zinc is one of the raw materials incorporated in the glass fibers. Type A Filters have avariable zinc content. Another component of the filter, sulfuric acid, is used as a dispersion medium. making the sheets unsuitable for measurement ofsulfates. Type A Glass Fiber Filters are less likely to develop static charge ortearthanotherglass fiber mediatypes.They are used extensively in applications where zinc and iron content is notimportant.orwheresulfate contentis not being determined. Size 37 mm 47 mm 102 mm s··x1o·· Product No. 61715 61694 61696 61701 Filters/Pkg. 500 100 100 100 TYPEA GLASS FIBER FILTER

SPECIFICATION REPORT Thefollowing pnysoc:allcl'lemucal propenoesreprnenl tygoc:al. -agevatunOOIOionecl in accordanc:ewotn Oiccepted teslmesnods. Tney ate sub,ect 10 normal manulac:sunnq 'W.IIIOiiiOns and Ill SUCIPiiecl U I tecnnocao SlrYICe. Tlttl ltl.ii)'siS hU Oeen tr1¥le Ill

**acco~f!CI** .,,,,.. EPA proc•tJures tmoetogtilms.B" .- urshflt}. ELEMENTS: Antimony ................. 30 Arsenic ................... 30 Beryllium ..................1 Bismuth .•.•..............10 Cadmium ....•............. 5 Chromium
................10 Cobalt ....................10 Copper . . . . . . . . . ...•2 Iron

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .2300 Lead

. .. .. .. ..20 Manganese
.............. 200 Mercury .................100 Molybdenum
..............10 Nickel ....................10 Selenium
............... 5000 Tin .......................10 Titanium
......

**~·** .......·.170 Vanadium .•.•.., :. .......10 Zinc ................... 5000 to 25.000 OTHER PHYSICALS: BSO "pH
............ .. OOP @320/cm/min ..522

.. ..8.5 (ASTM Method 2986 .99.9% Tensile Strength (Fed. Spec. UUP318) .750 gr Weight. 8"xl0" sheet
.......4.0:::.3 gr. Flow Resistance (Max.) @320 em/min
......... 60 mm Flow Rate (air) lpm/cm1 @ 70 em Hg
.....SO Max. Use Temp
......... 40()-C Static Properties
......Low Ability to Fold
. . . . . . . . . . .Excellent WATER EXTRACTABLE IONS: Sulfate .100 Chloride....

. .1500 Nitrate
............50 Fluoride
. . . ......... 15 Ammonia....

. ..20 ';:111 G•1m01n Proceour•

A 500 ml doslllled ..,;u•r a. Add 15 drOOS

**ntur~J·d** l<CI SOlUtiOn C. Shred one !"•10'' SMHI

**~ncl** soa11. on or•oari'Cl

**..,~fer** lor

one hour 0. Aun OH

**~~ amoo•nt~emo.ratur•.**  

# TypeAJE Glass Fiber Filters
FEATURES • Lowtrace metals. • Medium Handlingcharacteristics. • Available in all sizes. • Minimum of 99..9% retention forparticlesof.31'masdetermined byOOPtests. • Binder'free. type.AJE

**Gl~** Fiber Filters are composed of low acidsolubleglass fiber. They contain low levels ofboth zinc and iron. The filters do react with atmospheric sulfurdioxide; and therefore. when high levels of sulfur are expected. corrections forthis reaction should be accounted for. Type .AJE Glass Fiber Filters are binder free and ideal far gravimetric analysis of air pollutants. This pure. organic free filter is the basis far procedureswidely used in determining municipal and industrial air polluting substances. Size 25mm 37mm 47mm 102mm S'"x10'" Product No. 61630 61652 61631 61633 61638 Filters/Pkg. 500 500 100 100 100 TYPE AlE GLASS FIBER FILTER SPECIFICATION REPORT Thelollowtng pn)'Sieallchenvcaf prop«t1esrepresent

**rypoca.~..wes** oa1ame<1 in .lccordance-ch Oiccec:nld test ITMthods.They,,. JUbtKt ID,.......manufacturing var111ions &rtd 1r• SIJCIPii«< as a tech"'cal Hrv•CI. n..

**~** liar Men made "' ICCOI'dance-rftEPADI'OCttiUfe$ (ff'HCrOI}ratfl£r

**~** 1fT"m-J. ELEMENTS: Antimony ................• 20 Arsenic ................... 20 Beryllium ..................1 Bismuth ................•.10 Cadmium .................. 2 Chromium .......•.......•10 Cobalt ...................•10 Copper .....•.......•...•.. 2 Iron ..•.............1Q0-1800 Lead ....•..•........•...•10 Manganese ................ 2 Mercury .................. 80 Molybdenum
..............10 Nickel ....................10 Selenium
................ 200 Tin ••••.........•••.••.•..10 Titanium ..................10 Vanadium ................10 Zinc •......•.•............ 90 OTHER PHYSICALS: BSO .................... 522 "pH ...................... 9.0 DOP @320/cm/min ASTM Methods 2986)

..99.9% Tensile Strength

. (Fed. Spec. UUP31 8)

..600 gr. Weight 8''x10''sheet
....... 4.0::: .3 gr. Flow Resistance (Max.) @320 em/min. •...•••.80 mm Flow Rate (air) lpm/cm1@ 70 em Hg
.....60 M.ax. Use Temp..•......4oo•c Static Properties

.....Medium Ability to F.old..........

. ...Good WATER EXTRACTABLE IONS: Sulfate

.. . . . . ...........600 Chloride. Nitrate.......

. .....115 Fluoride
....... Ammonia.

. ......13 'pH-Getman

**Pro<;~ure:**

A. 500 ml dostolled wal•• a Add 15 droos

**Solllur~ted** l<CJ solutoon. C Snreadon•8''l10'' $1'1"1 lncl

**so~Jt** on

**ororo~•.;, ·~ler** lOt

onel'lour. 0. Aun OH at

**~moo•nt temoer~lure.**  .. ..1500

....87

GUAI=lOIAN sYSTEMS 1ncl»

**~** o-.·lm HIPIOB£ IS-IARIIUI')

**~lllll**

**1-1~** PliOIE

## ua·...UJIIIUPJ


# ...

**~** 

# ..

**~z:iD**

**~2SI** 

## - 

# - .. .. "'

**~liiD**

**~liiD** 

# ...

**~** 

### 1!5



## ....

**~** ::llll 

### c:; 

# ...
.... 

## giQD !;100 

# "' Q 

# ... 

# - ;! :Ill
- IIU I Illul

**~~~~**

**~** 

# .. I 0



# • 2Q 411 II ID 0 &

**~** iD 

### u POWI$TAT S£TIUIG,) POIWTAT SfniiiC.\

1-11PRO&£ (IS-c•A IAiliiUPi

2!1 411 10 10 POrtRHAT

**SETTih~.** \



## ,,., GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 1nc I I I

# GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC INITIAL CALlBRATION

Run Number Barometric Pres, in Hg Orifice pres drop, in H20 Critical Orifice ld # K Factor Actual Vacuum, in Hg Gas Volume Dry !nit, CF Gas Volume Dry Final, CF Ambient Temp Initial, F Ambient Temp Final, F Dry Gas Temp !nit In, F Dry Gas Temp Final in, F Dry Gas Temp !nit Out, F Dry Gas Temp Final Out, F Run Time, sec
Meter Calibration Factor, Y Average Y Less than +/- 0.02 from average
Delta H@ Average H@ Less than +/- 0.20 from average 

### Meter Box 1000, Omega 10 on 4-2-01

1 2 3 30.32 30.32 30.32

0.66 1.2 2.1 EG-48 EG-55 EG-63

0.3456 0.4596 0.5946 22.0 21.0 19.5 922.676 927.679 932.873 927.679 932.873 937.880 73 68 68 66 67 69 75 70 71 70 71 71 74 70 70 70 70 70 642 504 378
0.9676 0.9700 0.9737 0.9704 YES YES YES
1.80 1.85 1.94 1.89 YES YES YES

Signature



# ~ 

# r/li-t=- 4 30.32 4 EG-73

0.8170 17.0 937.880 942.889 69 68 71 72 70 71 274
0.9659 YES
1.95 YES 5 30.32

5.95 EG-81 1.0110 15.0 942.889 947.985 69 69 72 74 71 71 228
0.9745 YES
1.90 YES

112 

### GUARDIAN sYSTEMS1nc

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC Recalibration of Box 1000, OMEGA 10

Project:

Run Number Barometric Pres, in Hg Orifice pres drop, in H20 Critical Orifice ld # K Factor Actual Vacuum, in Hg Gas Volume Dry lnit, CF Gas Volume Dry Final, CF Ambient Temp Initial, F Ambient Temp Final, F Dry Gas Temp lnit In, F Dry Gas Temp Final In, F Dry Gas Temp lnit Out, F Dry Gas Temp Final Out, F Run Time, sec
Meter Calibration Factor, Y Delta H@ Previous Y Previous H@

Calibrated by: 

### 9-24-01
General Shale Products Corp. Stack:

Average Meter Pressure 1.494 1 2 3 29.92 29.92 29.92

2.00 2.00 2.00 EG-63 EG-63 EG-63

0.5946 0.5946 0.5946 20.0 20.0 20.0 47.281 52.283 57.285 52.283 57.285 62.311 67 68 67 67 67 68 67 68 69 68 69 70 66 66 67 66 67 67 379 379 383
0.9719 0.9729 0.9794 1.88 1.88 1.88 0.9704 % Difference 1.89 % Difference 

# '1. ;;}/-

**~** 

# ..--------

**~---':.0__,~---··**..



## ~~~~~- Outlet

Average 29.92 2.0 EG-63 0.5946 20.0 52.283 57.293 67 67 68 69 66 67 380.33
0.9747 1.88 0.45% -0.54%

Signature



### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS

### enc 113Actual Temperature. F 

### 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 

### 900 950 1000 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC Temperature Calibration for Omega-10 on 4-2-01 on Box #1000
Reading Temperature. F Correction 

### 51 101 152 202 253 303 351 401 450 500 551 

### 602 652 

### 701 751 800 

### 851 900 

### 951 1001 in Reading. F -1 -1 -2 -2 -3 -3 -1 -1 0 0 -1 -2 -2 -1 -1 0 -1 0 -1 -1 Regression Output: Constant Std Err ofY Est R Squared No. of Observations Degrees of Freedom X Coefficient(s) Std Err of Coef.

SIGNATURE 

### 1.001227 0.0006523 -1.845623 0.8400857 0.9999924 20 18 

### Read Actual 56 54. 

# __ __:__;



# ~ct.~"i~- --------

GUARDIAN sYSTEMS IMC 114

### Hot Box 9

Hot Box 10

Hot Box 11

Hot Box 12

Hot Box 13

Hot Box 14

Hot Box 15

SIGNATURE 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC Temperature Calibration for Hotboxes (Cont'd) 

### 4-2-01
220 220 250 251 275 276 220 220 250 250 275 275 220 220 250 251 275 276 220 222 250 253 275 276 220 220 250 252 275 277 220 221 250 249 275 274 220 220 250 251 275 274 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -3 -1 0 -2 -2 -1

1 1 0 -1

1

115 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS1ncDevice lmpinger 1
lmpinger 2
lmpinger3
lmpinger4
lmpinger 5
lmpinger 6
lmpinger7
lmpinger 8

SIGNATURE 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC Temperature Calibration for lmpingers on 4-2-01

Actual Reading Correction Tem11erature, F

**Tem~rature,** F in Reading, F 40 41 -1 55 57 -2 75 77 -2 40 40 0 55 55 0 75 76 -1 40 40 0 55 55 0 75 75 0 40 40 0 55 56 -1 75 76 -1 40 41 -1 55 56 -1 75 75 0 40 41 -1 55 55 0 75 77 -2 40 38 2 55 54 1 75 75 0 40 41 -1 55 56 -1 75 75 0



### GUARDIAN sYSTEMS1nc 116Date: 4-30-01 

### GUARDIAN SYSTEMS INC Pitot Calibration Form Without nozzle

Probe#: 4-2 Calibrated By: lalan Kirby Average Velocity, f/m 3,944

Run# 1 2 3 Pstd 0.98 0.98 0.98 Side A Ptype s 1.40 1.40 1.40

Is average deviation less than or equal to 0.01?

Run# 1 2 3 Pstd 0.98 0.98 0.98 Side B Ptype s 1.40 1.40 1.40

Is average deviation less than or equal to 0.01?

Is absolute value ofthe difference between each side equal to or less than 0.01 Avg Cp=

Avg Cp =



### Average PCF

# =

SIGNATURE

117 Cp(s) 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828

Cp(s) 0.828 0.828 0.828 0.828



## 0.828 Avg= 

### YES

Avg = 

### YES
YES Deviation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Deviation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000



### GUARDIAN sYSTEMS IMC

# IA'IBOC GASES

CUSTOMER BOG KNOXVILLE TN 2300 SYCAMORE DR KNOXVILLE, TN 37921 1773
CUSTOMER PD NO: URS RADIAN FM088 Previous Certification Oate(s): CYLINDER NO EXPIRATION DATE CERTIFICATION DATE CYLINDER PRESSURE PRODUCT ID NO LOT NUMBER Assay Laboratory SOC GASES 1075 Cindare Drive Port Allen,LA 70767 (225) 388 0900

XC0002108 10117102 10/17/00 2000 psig 02003508 408813



### ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
s calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol,

**Do~ment** EPA-600197/121, Using Procedure G1. Ail Values certified le +/-1% NISTTraceable,

.

**~:**..•_if_ •• '

**~ ~-**  '

**omP~-n·eribt~-** 

### · ITRICOXIDE -_j _, ,:X,oEs oF NITROGEN, .• - ti. ITROGE'rJ'

Type NTRM 81685

Instrument/Make/Model Nico!e!/550/AO19603531

'age: 1 Of 1 Do Not Use This Cytinder below 150 psig. Le. 1.0 Megapascal



### CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY LOTIO Cylinder No Concentration 98060706 XC0035318 252.20 +I· 1.90 ppm NO/N2 

### ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY
Analytical Principle FTIR

118 Last Multipoint Calibration 10/13/00

QA Approved 

# c:J Expiration 05101/02Assay Laboratory BOG GASES

**~11·**

## BOC GASES 1075 Cinclare Drive Port Allen.LA 70767 (225) 388 0900

CUSTOMER GUARDIAN SYSTEMS 305 ASHEVILLE ROAD LEEDS, AL 350941406
CUSTOMER PO NO: 146069 Previous Certification Oate(s): 

### ·.CERTIFICATE OF 

### ANALYSIS EPA 

### Protocol Gas CYLINDER NO CC95905 EXPIRATION DATE 11/29/02 CERTIFICATION DATE 11/29/00 CYLINDER PRESSURE 2000 psig PRODUCT ID NO 02003951 LOT NUMBER 415381


### ANALYTICAL INFORMATION '·

..\

This calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability Protocot, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified to be +/-1% NIST Traceable.

Compori8nts NITRIC OXIDE .AL OXIDES OF NITROGEN NITROGEN

Type NTRM 81686

lnstrumenUMake/Model

- **----~--~--~--** NicoleU550/AD19603531

Page: 1 Of 1 LOTIO 98060505 Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. i.e. 1.0 Megapascal

. Analytical Results RequestedMixture j:ertified ""- · · Conci!iltration 475,00 PPITl
- -
BALANCE GAS .. .469.5ppm ',469.5ppm Analyticat

**uncertaifi~**_ **~;** +f-1.00% NISTTraceable

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY Cylinder No Concentration XC-()03483B 502.00 +/- 3.50 ppm NO/N2 ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY
Analytical Principie FTIR

119 QA Approved Last Multipoint Calibration

**~=:c--.··--·--** 11/09/00 Assay Oates
11/20/00 & 11/28/00 11/28/00

Expiration 02/01/02JSTOMER

**~~._;-** JARDIAN SYS-FIELD SEFy il'"::.:.SHEVILLE ROAD 'EDS. AC 3509414J0
JSTOMER P0 NO: GUARDIAN SYS. E7056 evious

**~ertificatio~** Date(s}: **--~**
<

···-

**-~-f'** -. . CYLJNDER NO EXP,IRATION DATE 01103/03 :CERTIFICATION DATE 01/03/01

, CYuNDER PRESSURE 2000 psig

PRODUCT ID NO : 02001315 LOTNUMBER .:;, **413~~4** .--···. --,



# ;;:i?~'::':- libration'.Sfandard has -1 '*!Ntsrtiaceable. been certified per 1!1e 1997 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-000/97/121, Using

;..---.-"'

pe RM 81661X

;truiiientJMake/Model ;oleV550/AD1{603531 Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 pslg._i.e. 1.0 Megapascal

CALIBRATION STANDARDS USED IN ASSAY LOTIO Cylinder No Concentration 98061112 XC004998B 246.10 +1- 1.70 ppm S02f!'l2 ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USED IN ASSAY
Analytical Principle FTIR



### 120 Last Multipoint Calibration 01/02101

/)' ._.:':, : ,.-_: ".:..:lt., Expiration
_ **-~l** 10/02/02



# ;~~:

### ( 

# I.IIBOC GASES Assay Laboratory BOC Gases 1075 Cindaire Drive Port Allen, LA 70767 (225) 338 0900

CUSTOMER GUARDIAN SYS-FIELD SERV 305 ASHEVILLE ROAD ATIN: TOM LOTZ SR LEEDS, AL 350941406
CUSTOMER PO NO: 11057 Previous Certification Date(s): CYUNDERNO EXPIRATION DATE CERnFICATION DATE CYLINDER PRESSURE PRODUCT ID NO: LOT NUMBER

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION CC29440 08/15102 08115100 2000 psig RSTU327553 398n3 

# ..

This calibration standard has been certified per the 1997 EPA Traceability ProtocoJ, Document EPA-600/97/121, Using Procedure G1. All Values certified to be +/-1% NJSTTraceable.

Type LOT ID NTRM 81662 98060313

lnstrumenUMake/Model
NicoleV550/AD19603531

Page: 1 Of 1 BG 416A (7/99) Do Not Use This Cylinder below 150 psig. I.e. 1.0 Megapascal

CALIBRATION SfANDARDSUSED IN ASSAY Cylinder No Concentration Expiration XC005113B 997 +/- 9 ppm S02/N2 06103/01 ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS USEDIN ASSAY Analytical Principle

FTIR

121 QA Approved Last Multipoint Calibration 07/19/00



# d-. j::."



# ·~