alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1153 

AN ACT 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1153 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

3 of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec6 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

12 ‘‘taxes’’; 

13 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

14 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

15 of their participation in an affiliated business 

16 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

17 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

18 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

19 and 

20 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

21 the following: 

22 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

23 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party charge 

24 not retained by the mortgage originator, 

25 creditor, or an affiliate of the creditor or 

26 mortgage originator; or 
3 

•HR 1153 EH

1 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

2 106(e)(1);’’; and 

3 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in6 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 

7 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

11 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi12 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

14 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi15 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

16 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

17 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

18 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

19 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final regula-
4 

•HR 1153 EH

1 tions to carry out the amendments made by this Act, and 

2 such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1153 

AN ACT 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve 

in connection with a mortgage transaction. upon the definitions provided for points and fees
Exhibit 99.10


Certification Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Relating to Reports Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Ford
Credit Auto Receivables Two LLC


I,  Ann Marie Petach, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the following documents:

(a)     All reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
        filed by Ford Credit Auto Receivables Two LLC for the year ended
        December, 31 2002 (the "8-K Reports"); and

(b)     The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December, 31 2002
        (the "Annual Report," together with the 8-K Reports, the "Reports") to
        be filed by Ford Credit Auto Receivables Two LLC;

 in each case, relating to the following entities:

                o Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2002-A;
                o Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2002-B;
                o Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2002-C; and
                o Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2002-D.

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a whole, does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
covered by the Annual Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included in the Reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in the Reports.

Date: March 27, 2003


                                        By: /s/ Ann Marie Petach
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Vice President
                                                (Chief Securitization Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92195-92196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27154]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

[[Page 92196]]

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 450 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-359, K2025-357.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27154 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7704

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES EDWARD RANCHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-268, CA-96-31-5)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Rancher, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Rancher, Nos. CR-89-268; CA-96-31-5 (N.D.W.

Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covenant Transportation Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard B. Cribbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  November 9, 2010
/s/ Richard B. CribbsRichard B. CribbsChief Financial Officer
 
 Back to Form 10-Q
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Forces Japan J3 Director of Operations Visits USS Shiloh, Increases Joint Ballistic Missile Defense Cooperation

By Religious Programs Specialist 3rd Class Curran Croft-GreenwellUSS Shiloh (CG 67) Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
#### John Wagstaff *v.*Charles Smith.

A tenant in common, in possession, is not protected by the statute of limitation from an account to his co-tenant of the rents and profits, until three years after a partition.

This bill prayed an account of the issues and profits of land, of which the plaintiff and defendant were ten*265ants in common. The defence by plea and answer was the statute of limitations.

Upon the proof, it turned out, that the bill was filed in the court, of Equity for Granville, in February, 1829, and a partition had been made of the land held in common in November, 1826.

*Nash*and *Devereux*for the plaintiff.

*Badger*for the defendant.

Henderson, Chief-Justice,

after stating the above facts, proceeded : The statue of limitations commenced running when the partition was made, for it is not the receipt of each particular item of an account which puts the statute in motion, but the *cesser*of the privity or connection frompvhich the accountability’ arises. So long as that relationship or privity or connection continues, the statute does not commence running. During that time there is nothing adverse, no -withholding by the one, to the prejudice of the other. ' The very act of receiving affirms the confidential relationship in law or in fact. Any other construction would destroy all confidence, and necessarily put a limit of three -years to all those confidential connections in pecuniary matters, which tend so much to facilitate the transactions of society. The defendant must come to an account.

Pee Curiam. — Decree accord inguy.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32
                          Rule 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Leisure Direct,
Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Leisure Direct, Inc. and will be retained by Leisure Direct, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

April 2, 2007                    /s/  John R. Ayling
                                 --------------------------
                                 John R. Ayling
                                 (Chief executive officer)












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

American Vanguard Corporation 

Newport Beach, CA 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements Form S-8 (Nos. 333-125813, 333-102381, 333-76218 and 333-64220) of American Vanguard Corporation of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules, and the effectiveness of American Vanguard Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, CA 

March 13, 2009
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Readout of Assistant Secretary of Defense Ely Ratner's Meeting With Australia's First Assistant Secretary Bernard Philip
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Readout of Assistant Secretary of Defense Ely Ratner's Meeting With Australia's First Assistant Secretary Bernard Philip</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Jan. 31, 2024</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p><span style="font-size:larger;">Department of Defense Spokesman Lt. Col. Martin Meiners provided the following readout:</span></p>

<p><span style="font-size:larger;">Assistant Secretary of Defense Ely Ratner met with Australia's First Assistant Secretary Bernard Philip at the Pentagon today to discuss growing defense and security cooperation between the United States and Australia.</span></p>

<p><span style="font-size:larger;">The two officials emphasized their commitment to further deepen defense cooperation across several key priority areas for the U.S.-Australia alliance, including defense industrial base collaboration through Australia's Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise, and bilateral force posture initiatives that focus on implementing last year's announcements of priority locations for build-out in Australia. They also discussed a range of regional security issues, including the importance of operational safety in the East and South China Seas, and they reaffirmed the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and across the Indo-Pacific region.</span></p>

<p><span style="font-size:larger;">Both officials affirmed their countries' commitment to advancing a shared regional vision for peace and security in a free and open Indo-Pacific, including through enhanced cooperation with regional allies and partners like Japan, as the "Unbreakable Alliance" between the United States and Australia continues to strengthen.</span></p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK SEDDEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 157 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
From: "Serne, Jim (Raleigh,NC - US)" <JSerne@trcsolutions.com>

To: Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/21/2010 10:28 AM Subject: Secondary Aluminum Tests

Peter, The target compound list for Secondary Aluminum includes 1,2 - Dichloropropane and 1,3 - Dichloropropene on the VOST list, but the lab reported 1,2 - Dichloropropane and 1,3 - Dichloropropane. The lab normally looks for 1,3 - Dichloropropane, not 1,3 - Dichloropropene. Does EPA want emissions data for 1,3 - Dichloropropene or was that possi bly a typo on the EPA target list?? The lab didn’t calibrate for 1,3 - Dichloropropene, but they said that they can go back and report it as a TIC. The results for 1,3 - Dichloropropane were all Non Detects. Jim Serne, PE, QSTI TRC Environmental Cor poration 5540 Centerview Drive Raleigh, NC 27606 (919) 256 -6231 (919) 302 -2520 (cell) (919) 838 -9661 (fax)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|               |                      |
|--------------------|---------------------------|
| May 10,  2010 | /s/  Stephanie G. DiMarco |
|               | Stephanie  G. DiMarco     |
|               | Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 25, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00810

- CR

Mario RIOS, Ap pellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR5416 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 1 8 , 2017, court reporter Linda A. Hernandez filed a notice of late reporter’s record. The notice states Appellant has not paid the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the date of this order that the reporter’s record has been requested and either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or ( 2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, Appellant’s brief will be due within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in

A ppellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 25th day of January, 2017

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00321

- CR

D ERRICK R ESHORD W ALTON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 431st District Court

of Denton County (F17

- 2959

- 431)

October 31, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisd iction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H85-H86]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:

[[Page H86]]

  (The following Members (at the request of Ms. Hirono) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Ms. Woolsey, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. DeFazio, for 5 minutes, today.
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Sherman, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Westmoreland) to revise 
and extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Wolf, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Poe of Texas, for 5 minutes, January 15.
  Mr. Jones, for 5 minutes, January 15.
  Mr. Gohmert, for 5 minutes, today.
  (The following Member (at his request) to revise and extend his 
remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Mr. Boozman, for 5 minutes, today.

                          ____________________
```