alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Blanca Nieto, * From the 358th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. D-129810.

Vs. No. 11-13-00012-CV * January 30, 2014

Permian Basin Community Centers * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

for MHMR, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Bailey, J., and McCall, sitting by 

 assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal 

are taxed against Blanca Nieto.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2348

GLORIA K. SORGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM S. COHEN, Secretary of the Department

of Defense,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-1737-A)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gloria K. Sorge, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Rehnquist, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

the civil action she filed against her former employer. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Sorge v. Cohen, No. CA-96-1737-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 2,

1997). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           4,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,984
<INVENTORY>                                     72,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,955
<PP&E>                                         347,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                (58,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 905,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,442
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   905,535
<SALES>                                        415,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               415,155
<CGS>                                          314,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  385,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (821)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,981
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1,496)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1,496)


</TABLE>
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Joint Task Force-Red Hill Residual Fuel Update
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="adetail" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/NewsArticle">
    <meta itemprop="datePublished" content="2024-02-12T17:44:00.0000000" />
    <h1 itemprop="headline">Joint Task Force-Red Hill Residual Fuel Update</h1>
    <p class="info">
        <strong>24-001</strong> |  Feb. 12, 2024
    </p>
    <div class="content">
        
        
        
        <div class="body" itemprop="articleBody">
            <strong>HONOLULU, Hawaii — </strong>
            <p>Joint Task Force-Red Hill (JTF-RH) released an updated dashboard Monday tracking residual fuel removal and key upcoming events.</p>

<p>As of Feb. 12, JTF-RH safely removed 29,273 gallons of residual fuel from the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (RHBFSF).</p>

<p>For more information about JTF-RH, visit pacom.mil/jtf-red-hill/ or download the App by searching for “JTF–Red Hill” in the Apple App store or Google Play store.</p>

        </div>
    </div>

    <ul class="contact">
        
        
        <li><strong>JTF-RH Public Affairs</strong></li>
        
        
        
        <li><strong>Phone:</strong>808-501-8320</li>
        
        
        
        
        <li>jtfrh-pao@us.navy.mil</li>
        
    </ul>


    
</div>


    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quest Minerals & Mining Corp., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr., President of the Company, certify
the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                   13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.        The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                   all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                   operations of the Company.



/s/ EUGENE CHIARAMONTE, JR.
--------------------------------
Eugene Chiaramonte, Jr.,
President
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
July 19, 2007
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,691
<SECURITIES>                                   159,226
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                       266
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         113,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       286,541
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,957
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                     161
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,229
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 55 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 55

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the final rule of the Office of Natural 
      Resources Revenue relating to ``Amendments to Civil Penalty 
                             Regulations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

 Mr. Stewart (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gohmert, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. 
Cramer, and Mr. Biggs) submitted the following joint resolution; which 
was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the final rule of the Office of Natural 
      Resources Revenue relating to ``Amendments to Civil Penalty 
                             Regulations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of Natural Resources Revenue relating to 
``Amendments to Civil Penalty Regulations'' (81 Fed. Reg. 50306 (August 
1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David Samuel Coats, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Schlotzsky’s, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 11, 2004      By: /s/ DAVID SAMUEL COATS       David Samuel Coats   President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00300-CR

David Wade Hubbard

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 355th District Court of 

Hood County (CR11218)

May 1, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect 

court costs of $450 and the order to withdraw funds to reflect a total amount of 

$4,341. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8109

JAMES D. TINSLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SHERIFF RICK DAVIS; CAPTAIN GILBERT; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 

STEVE WYATT; COUNTY OF HENDERSON, N.C.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00379-GCM)

Submitted: April 13, 2010 Decided: May 12, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James D. Tinsley appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his 

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s orders. Tinsley v. Sheriff Rick Davis, No. 1:09-cv00379-GCM (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009; Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered November 22, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00717
- CV
JOE ERVIN LOCKRIDGE , Appellant

V. STEPHANIE MARTIN , Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 02578

O RDER By letter filed November 1 8 , 2021, appellant informs the Court that t he copy of appellant’s motion for new trial included in the clerk’ s record in this appeal is incomp lete. The motion consisted of six pages, and only the first two pages are in
the record. Appellant also notes the record omits any order on the new trial
motion. We construe appellant’s letter as a motion to supplement the clerk’s record.
We GRANT the m otion and ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre tofile , no later than November 29, 2021, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a

complete copy of appellant’s six

- page motion for new trial as well as a copy of any
order on the motion. If no order exists, Ms. Pitre shall state so in writing. In light of the incomplete record, w e RESET the deadline for the filing of appellant’s corrected brief to December 17, 2021.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre
and the parties. We further DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to mail appellant a paper copy of the supplemental record upon its filing.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Phillip DeZwirek Phillip DeZwirekChairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerMarch 17, 2008
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184
sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

April 18, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division George Wellington Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta and Gol for an Ame nded Statement of Authorization and Codeshare Exemption

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0095

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application filed on April 13, 2011 and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be gran ted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Bob Finamore, DOT Brian Hedberg, DOT Charlie Donley, Counsel for Gol info@airlineinfo.com
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Greetings Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Greetings Corporation and will be retained by American
Greetings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date: May 11, 2005

/s/ Zev Weiss
----------------------------
Zev Weiss

Chief Executive Officer,
(principal executive officer)

/s/ Joseph B. Cipollone
-----------------------------
Joseph B. Cipollone

Vice President and Corporate
Controller; Chief Accounting Officer
(interim principal financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001002175
<NAME>                        LABTEC INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          1,474,985
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  21,781,768
<ALLOWANCES>                   (1,303,048)
<INVENTORY>                    16,041,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               39,928,978
<PP&E>                          5,800,275
<DEPRECIATION>                 (3,190,232)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 63,585,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          28,991,646
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           40,132
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   63,585,175
<SALES>                        24,088,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               24,088,354
<CGS>                          14,441,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   7,279,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   57,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,171,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   637,780
<INCOME-TAX>                      248,862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               388,918
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      388,918
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.10



</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Chadwick Daray Heath, Appellant

No. 06-23-00191-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-22-

28584). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Rambin. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Chadwick Daray Heath, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 14, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk