alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (J06) 
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint bio">
    <div class="header">
        
        

        

        

        
        
        <h1 class="title">Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (J06) </h1>
        <h2 class="subtitle">Captain Damian D. “Dom” Flatt, U.S. Navy</h2>
        <h2 class="subtitle"></h2>
        <h2 class="subtitle"></h2>
    </div>
    <div>
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <p>Captain Dom Flatt is the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.<br />
<br />
Among other assignments during 26 years of active duty service, Captain Flatt served as the Fleet Judge Advocate to Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet; as the Principal Deputy Legal Counsel to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Commanding Officer of Region Legal Service Office Japan; the senior legal advisor to the Vice Chief of Naval Operations; the Director of Legislation at the Navy Office of Legislative Affairs; the Executive Assistant to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy; professor of leadership, ethics and law at the U.S. Naval Academy; and as a trial defense counsel at Naval Legal Service Office Mid-Atlantic.<br />
<br />
In deployed settings, Captain Flatt served as the senior advisor to Afghanistan’s Ministry of Interior and the Afghan National Police - Specialized Police Units while assigned to Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan; the staff judge advocate to Commander, Carrier Strike Group NINE embarked in USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) with deployments to the Western Pacific and Arabian Gulf; and, as the staff judge advocate to Amphibious Squadron FOUR in USS Kearsarge (LHD-3) and USS Carter Hall (LSD-50) to Western Africa, and the Mediterranean, Aegean and Black Seas alongside the Marines of the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit.<br />
<br />
Captain Flatt holds an undergraduate degree from Trinity University in San Antonio, TX and his law degree from the Northwestern School of Law at Lewis & Clark College. He was a fellow in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Seminar XXI foreign policy program. Captain Flatt is entitled to wear the Defense Distinguished Service Medal and the Legion of Merit (four awards) among other personal, unit and campaign awards.<br />
<br />
<br />
(as of February 2022)</p>

    </div>
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment**Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MAURICE BAILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 217 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Maui General Store, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 8, 2007 By: /s/ Richard Miller  Richard Miller, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 90087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26370]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 610 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-254, K2025-252.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-26370 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03 - 20 - 00463 - CV
Texas Department of State Health Services and John Hellerstedt, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Texas D epartment of S tate H ealth S ervices , Appellant s
v. Crown Distr ibuting LLC; America Juice Co. LLC; Custom Botanical Dispensary, LLC; and 1937 Apothecary, LLC , Appellee s

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D - 1 - GN - 20 - 004053 , THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R
PER CURIAM

A ppellees have filed an emergen cy motion for Rule 29.3 t emporary relief , seek ing reinstate ment of the trial court ’ s o rder granti ng their application for a temporary injunction and enjoining appellants from enforcing Rule 3 00.104

. See 25 Tex. Admin . Code § 300 .104 (2020) (Dep ’ t of State H ealth Servs., Manufacture, Processing, Distribution, and Retail Sale of Hemp Products for Smoking) ( “ The manufacture, processing, distribution, or retail sale of consumable hemp products for smoking is prohibited. ” ). We req ues ted a response and issued a t emporary order granting the relief while we considered the motion and res ponse. See Tex as Dep ’ t of State Health Serv s . v. Crown Distrib. LLC , No. 03

- 20

- 00463

- CV, 2020 WL 5778128, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Sept. 23, 2020, orde r ) (per curiam).2 For the rea so ns stated in this Court ’ s opinion in this case, see Tex as Dep ’ t of State Health Serv s . v. Crown Distrib. LLC , No. 03

- 20

- 00463

- CV, 202 1 WL

________ , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 5 , 202 1 , no pet. h. ) (mem. op.) , w e exercise o u r discretion under Rule 29.3

an d grant appellees ’ Rule 29.3 motion in par t and deny it in part , s ee Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. We temporarily enjoin appellants from enforc ing Rule 300.104 ’ s prohibitions against distribution or retail sale of consumable hemp p r oduc ts for smoking until disp os ition of the a ppeal

. See id. R. 18 ( “ The appellate court ’ s judgment on an appeal from an interlocutory order takes effect when the mandate is issued. ” ).

It is ordered on August 5, 2021

.

Befo re Justices Goodwin, Triana , a n d Kelly
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications I, Richard Miller, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Maui General Store, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: November 13, 2006 /s/ Richard Miller Richard Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### E. JENNINGS *against*J. AND A. J. HARDIN AND OTHERS.

The interest of a vendee of lands, where the contract rests in articles of conveyance, is not the subject of sale under execution, while the purchase money or any part of it remains unpaid.

(The case of *Frost*v. *Reynolds, 4 Ire.*Eq. *494,*cited and approved.)

Cause removed from the Court of Equity for Cleaveland county, at Spring Term,,1853. The allegations of the bill are sufficiently set forth in the opinion delivered by this Court, and the Reporter deems it unnecessary to state the pleadings further, which are very voluminous — the defendants’ answer denying any equity in the plaintiff, according to his own .showing, upon which point the case turned in this Court.

*Lander,*for the plaintiff.

*G. W. Baxter*and *Guión,*for the defendants.

*276Nash, C. J.

In *Frost*v. *Reynolds,*4 Ire. Eq. 494, it was decided that the interest of a vendee of land where the contract rests in articles of conveyance is not the subject of sale under execution while the purchase money *or any part of it*remains unpaid ; and where a sale does take place of such interest, the purchaser gains no title, nor any right which can enable him to call for a conveyance to his own use. This decision was made in-1847, and the bill in this case was filed in April, 1852. It alleges that the defendant, Carrell, was the owner of a lot in the town of Shelby, in Cleaveland county, which he agreed to sell to the defendants, A. J. Hardin and Joseph Hardin, at a price between eight and nine hundred dollars ; and to secure the payment thereof, the Hardins executed to Carrell their joint bond, and Carrell executed and delivered to them his bond to make a good and sufficient title to tlie lot, when the purchase money was paid. The bill states that the Hardins paid to Carrell two hundred and ten dollars upon their bond, and that the plaintiff, at May Term, 1849, of Cleaveland Superior Court, obtained a judgment against A. J. Hardin, and that the execution,-by his direction, was levied on the interest of said Hardin in said lot, and at the sale he became the purchaser. The interests of the other defendants are shown by the bill, which prays an acconnt and conveyance of one-half of the lot. ■

At the time when the plaintiff’s execution was levied, and the sale made, A. J. Hardin had no such interest in the lot as was subject to an execution, and the plaintiff, by his purchase, acquired no right to call for a conveyance of the legal title to himself.- The Hardins only held upon Carrell a bond to make them a title when they paid up the purchase money : but a small part of it had been paid at the time of the sale. In the case of *Reynolds,*the Court say there has been no instance in which this interest was held saleable under the Act o( 1812, either as a trust or an equity of redemption ; nor any principle laid down from which it can be adduced. 'It is unnecessary to repeat here the reasons which governed their decision in that case, we entirety concur in them ; and unless we were disposed to overrule that decision, which we are not, it governs and controls this case.

Pee. CuRiam. Bill dismissed with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           32184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 34112
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  138812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           157443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         61554
<OTHER-SE>                                     (123091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    138812
<SALES>                                          77850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 77850
<CGS>                                            27100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                114402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (41518)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (41518)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S353]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl TtlE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Steven Allender v. Judith Cooper, Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a

Katy Area Chamber of Commerce, and Katy Chamber of Commerce

d/b/a Katy Rice Harvest Festival

Appellate case number: 01-12-00430-CV

Trial court case number: 0859572

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Appellees Katy Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Area Chamber of Commerce and Katy

Chamber of Commerce d/b/a Katy Rice Harvest Festival have filed a motion to dismiss the

above-referenced appeal. The motion is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Sherry Radack

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 6, 2012
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H328]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              TARP REFORM

  (Mr. HALL of New York asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. HALL of New York. Mr. Speaker, the House approved the $700 
billion financial rescue package last October only under the condition 
that banks would be accountable and that taxpayers would know what the 
banks did with the money. We all know that that hasn't happened.
  The Bush administration and the Treasury Secretary never held up 
their end of the deal. They've ignored the measures Congress put in the 
package to protect the taxpayers. The result: blank checks to big banks 
and nothing to protect middle class families from foreclosures.
  Today, the House is going to vote to change this and will strengthen 
oversight on what the banks and the administration are doing with the 
funds. The taxpayers have the right to finally know exactly how their 
money was spent.

                          ____________________
```
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on DPRK Missile Launch</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Sept. 28, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p><span class="bumpedfont15">We are aware of the two ballistic missile launches and are consulting closely with our allies and partners. While we have assessed that this event does not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to our allies, the missile launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s unlawful WMD and ballistic missile programs. The U.S. commitments to the defense of the Republic of Korea and Japan remain ironclad.</span></p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of American Science & Engineering, Inc. (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

1.                    the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007 (“10-K”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                    theinformation contained in the Company’s 10-K being filed fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany
| Date: June 12, 2007 |
|---------------------|
|                |
|                | /s/ KENNETH J.  GALAZNIK |   |
|                | Kenneth J.  Galaznik |   |
| * *            | *Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer* | * * |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Science& Engineering, Inc. and will be retained by American Science &Engineering, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
     and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
     undersigned officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a
     Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
     officer's knowledge and belief, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K
     for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K
     fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul Theodore Owens
---------------------------
PAUL THEODORE OWENS

VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

JUNE 30, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H182]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, proceedings 
will resume on motions to suspend the rules previously postponed.
  Votes will be taken in the following order:
  House Resolution 41, by the yeas and nays;
  House Resolution 50, by the yeas and nays;
  House Resolution 43, by the yeas and nays.
  The first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote. 
Remaining electronic votes will be conducted as 5-minute votes.

                          ____________________
```
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00298-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M. AND C. F., A CHILD

Appeal from the 306th District Court of Galveston County (Tr. Ct. No. 13-CP-0068)

TO THE 306TH DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 2nd day of June, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to dismiss this appeal 

filed by the appellant, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. 

It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the 

appeal be dismissed. It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified 

below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 2, 2015.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices

Higley and Massengale.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 
in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 31, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT