alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Allis-Chalmers Corporation.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.


DATE: May 2, 2005                   BY: /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                        ---------------------------
                                        MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DATE: May 2, 2005                   BY: /S/ VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                        ---------------------------
                                        VICTOR M. PEREZ
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Statement by U.S. Ambassador to Nepal Dean R. Thompson
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Statement by U.S. Ambassador to Nepal Dean R. Thompson</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By U.S. EMBASSY KATHMANDU</b> <span class="date">/ Published Oct. 26, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>U.S. Embassy in Nepal -- It is an honor to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Nepal. I am humbled by the opportunity and determined to serve with an unwavering commitment to the U.S. – Nepal relationship, one that is based on respect for sovereignty and common values.<br />
<br />
Right now is an important moment for our countries, and I look forward to working with all Nepalis to address the most pressing issues of our time. In the coming years, the United States will continue to support Nepal in achieving its goal of sustainable and inclusive economic growth. As the climate crisis impacts the Himalayan region, we will help bolster Nepal’s climate resilience through innovative programming and partnership. Finally, working with civil society, free media, and government, our countries will continue defending democracy and strengthening the will of the people, free from corruption, disinformation, and repression.<br />
<br />
In our 75th year of U.S. – Nepal diplomatic relations, I look ahead to my tenure with immense optimism that the successes of the next 75 years will surpass even the greatest achievements of our last.<br />
<br />
Thank you.</p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 731 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-415, K2025-413.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27234 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2242/2004

of 22 December 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 976/1999 laying down the requirements for the implementation of Community operations, other than those of development cooperation, which, within the framework of Community cooperation policy, contribute to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law and to that of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms in third countries

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181a(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 976/1999 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

C. VEERMAN            

----

(1)  Opinion of 16 december 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2)OJ L 120, 8.5.1999, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 120, 8.5.1999, p. 8. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).

(4)OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1. Interinstitutional Agreement as amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 25).

(5)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2.

(7)OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1216 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide veterans affected by 

school closures certain relief and restoration of educational benefits, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2017 

Mr. MESSER (for himself, Mr. BANKS of Indiana, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. 

BUCSHON, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

BARLETTA, Mr. DESANTIS, and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide veterans 

affected by school closures certain relief and restoration 

of educational benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Veterans 

5 From School Closures Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1216 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF ENTITLEMENT TO POST-9/11 EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR VETERANS AF3 FECTED BY CLOSURES OF EDUCATIONAL IN4 STITUTIONS. 

5 (1) EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.—Section 3312 

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) DISCONTINUATION OF EDUCATION DUE TO

9 CLOSURE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any payment of edu11 cational assistance described in paragraph (2) shall 

12 not— 

13 ‘‘(A) be charged against any entitlement to 

14 educational assistance of the individual con15 cerned under this chapter; or 

16 ‘‘(B) be counted against the aggregate pe17 riod for which section 3695 of this title limits 

18 the individual’s receipt of educational assistance 

19 under this chapter. 

20 ‘‘(2) DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT OF EDU21 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE.—Subject to paragraph (3), 

22 the payment of educational assistance described in 

23 this paragraph is the payment of such assistance to 

24 an individual for pursuit of a course or courses 

25 under this chapter if the Secretary finds that the in26 dividual— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1216 IH

1 ‘‘(A) was forced to discontinue such course 

2 of study pursuit as a result of a permanent or 

3 temporary closure of an educational institution; 

4 or 

5 ‘‘(B) did not receive credit, or lost training 

6 time, toward completion of the program of edu7 cation being pursued at the time of such clo8 sure. 

9 ‘‘(3) PERIOD FOR WHICH PAYMENT NOT

10 CHARGED.—The period for which, by reason of this 

11 subsection, educational assistance is not charged 

12 against entitlement or counted toward the applicable 

13 aggregate period under section 3695 of this title 

14 shall not exceed the aggregate period permitted 

15 under such section.’’. 

16 (2) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (d) of such 

17 section, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply with 

18 respect to courses and programs of education discon19 tinued as described in paragraph (2) of such sub20 section after August 1, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,078,192
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,296,119
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,867,260
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,861,066
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     40,091,150
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (609,977)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,056,482
<DEPOSITS>                                  46,084,328
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            346,522
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,004
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,618,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              58,056,482
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,648,297
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              464,684
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               118,442
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,231,423
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,378,906
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,941
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,676,576
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  176,640
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,415,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                280,107
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     280,107
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   190,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.63
<LOANS-NON>                                     31,951
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               480,544
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   63,818
<RECOVERIES>                                    16,611
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              609,977
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        609,977
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund 24 LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Marni J. Nygard, President of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., the Managing Member of the Company, and Keith E. Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








| | /s/ Marni J Nygard                         | 
| | ------------------------------------------ | 
| | Marni J. Nygard, President                 | 
| | AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.              | 
| | Managing General Partner                   | 
| | March 30, 2022                             | 
| |                                            | 
| |                                            | 
| |                                            | 
| | /s/ Keith E Petersen                       | 
| | Keith E. Petersen, Chief Financial Officer | 
| | AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.              | 
| | Managing General Partner                   | 
| | March 30, 2022                             |
#### JACOB SIMMS *vs.*JOHN KILLIAN.

A. contracted to purchase from B. a tract of land at a stipulated price, and gave his written obligation to that effect. Afterwards, C., by parol, agreed to purchase A.’s interest in the contract, and A. by endorsement on his obligation directed B. to convey to C. Held, that the contract between A. and C. was void by the statute of frauds, and, of course, no action could be sustained on it.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Haywood County, Spring Term 1851, his Honor Judge Settle presiding.

■ This is assumpsit, in which the plaintiff sought to recover the sum of $200, part of the price, which the intestate promised to pay the plaintiff for his iitterest in a tract of land. On the general issue, the facts were these: The plaintiff contracted with one Wilde for the purchase of the land at $600, and paid him $210, and took' his obligation to convey to him upon the payment of the residue of the purchase money<■ Afterwards Jones, the defendant’s, intestate, contracted orally with the plaintiff for the purchase of his interest in the land at $>800; whereof he promised *253the plaintiff to pay $590 to Wikle in full of the balance due him, and to pay the plaintiff the remaining $210. Thereupon the plaintiff signed a written memorandum on Wikle’s obligation, that Jones was authorised to take a deed from Wikle in his own name, and delivered the paper to Jones ; who afterwards paid the purchase money io Wikle and got a deed from him, and also paid the plaintiff the sum of $10 in part of the $210, but died without making any farther payment. The defendant insisted, that the action would not lie, because the agreement was not in writing; and the presiding Judge was of that opinion and non-suited the plaintiff, and he appealed.

*J. W. Woodfin,*for the plaintiff.

*N. W. Woodfin,*for the defendant.

Ruffin, C. J.

The Court concurs in the opinion of his Honor, which is in accordance with the case of *Rice*v. *Carter,*decided here a year ago. The contract concerns the sale of an interest in land, and by the statute of frauds a party to it cannot be charged therewith, unless it be in writing and signed by the party thus sought to be charged. It was argued at-the bar, that the policy of the act was to protect owners of real estate from being deprived of it without written evidence under their own hand, and that a promise to pay money for land is not within the mischief. But the danger seems as great, that a purchase at an ex-horbitant price may by perjury be imposed on one, who did not contract for it, as that by similar means a feigned contract of sale should be established against the owner of land. Hence the act in terms avoids entirely every contract, of which the sale of land is the subject, in respect of a party, that is, either party, who does not charge himself by his signature to it after it has been reduced to writing.

Per Curiam. J udgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1135 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1135

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
                     Historic Preservation program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES HISTORIC 
              PRESERVATION PROGRAM REAUTHORIZED.

    Section 507(d)(2) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management 
Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 302101 note) is amended by striking the period 
at the end and inserting ``and each of fiscal years 2018 through 
2024.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### WILLIAM P. WITHERSPOON et al. v. WILLIAM B. DULA et al.

When the depositions of the witnesses in an equity suit, transmitted to the Supreme Court for hearing, are in such direct conflict with each other, that it is evident perjury has been committed, hut the court cannot tell on which side the guilt lies, it will direct feigned issues to be made up and tried in the Superior Court, where ’ the witnesses may be personally examined in open court, instead of empannelling a jury before it, the Supreme Court, under the special authority conferred upon it for that purpose, where such personal examination cannot be had.

Per Curiam.

' The Court is wholly unable to satisfy itself,upon the proofs which have been taken in this cause* as to the truth of the matters of fact therein put in issue.— Witnesses are in direct conflict with each other, so that there is-certainly perjury on one side or the other, and the Court cannot tell on which side this guilt lies. To satisfy its con-' science* it is obliged to call in the aid of a jury; but before a jury empannelled in this Court, under the special authority which the law has conferred for summoning such a jury, the witnesses cannot be personally examined. Such a jury, therefore, would have no further means of testing the credit of t-he witnesses,- than is possessed by the Court. Under *280these circumstances, the Court deems it proper to direct feigned issues to be made up and tried in the Superior Court of law for the county of Wilkes, to ascertain, 1st, whether a certain bond for the sum of ¡$395, or thereabouts, executed on or about the 25th of September, 1829, by the defendants William B. Dula and David E. Horton, payable twelve months after date, to William Dula, Senior, and John With-erspoon, administrators of Thomas Dula, deceased, was destroyed by the said William Dula, Sen., in his life time; 2ndly, whether the said bond was executed by the defendants upon an engagement of the said William Dula, Sen., that he would settle the same in account with his intestate’s estate, and the said defendant should not be required to pay the same; and, 3rdly, did the said William Dula, Sen., in his life time, account for the said bond, in settlement with his co-administrator, as being paid off by him. The decretal order, will, particulary, specify the manner of trial of said issues.