alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1283 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1283

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2017

Mr. Hultgren (for himself, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, and Mr. Messer) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Student Lending 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURES.

    Section 455(p) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(p)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Each institution'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Each institution''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Disclosure of apr at time of application.--In 
        addition to the disclosures required under paragraph (1), each 
        institution and contractor described in such paragraph shall 
        disclose to a borrower before disbursement of a loan made under 
        this part, in writing and in a form the borrower may keep, the 
        annual percentage rate applicable to the loan, taking into 
        account--
                    ``(A) the amount of the loan;
                    ``(B) the stated interest rate of the loan;
                    ``(C) the standard term for a loan of the same 
                type;
                    ``(D) any fees or additional costs associated with 
                the loan; and
                    ``(E) any capitalization of interest on the 
                loan.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 337/2 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 337 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 652 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 337

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 652 September 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 337/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 337/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 20 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 337/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 337/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AdventSoftware, Inc.

 

 
|   | November 8, 2007 | /s/ Stephanie G. DiMarco              |   |
|--------|------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |             | Stephanie G. DiMarco                  |
|   |             | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will beretained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
M. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  June 12, 2003                By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Parker
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Jeffrey M. Parker
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and
will be retained by Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Wayne J. Vespoli, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report, any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: February 9, 2007     /s/ Wayne J. Vespoli   Wayne J. Vespoli  Chief Financial Officer
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners’ Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on December 31, 2021
 
DOCKET
NUMBER
RESPONDENT'S
NAME
DOCKETED

TYPE*

BRIEFING
NOTICE DATE
BRIEFING STATUS
COMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING
1
17-0737
UHS of Westwood Pembroke, Inc.
UHS of Delaware, Inc.
03/19/20
DFR
03/25/20
Closed

2
18-1451
Summit Contracting Group, Inc.
08/24/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

3
16-1713
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

4
16-1813
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

5
16-1872
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

6
17-0023
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

7
17-0279
United States Postal Service
08/31/20
DFR
09/25/20
Closed

8
16-1865
AJM Packaging Corporation
10/07/20
DFR
10/14/20
Closed

9
19-0723
Midwest Equipment Company
10/23/20
DFR
11/25/20
Closed

10
16-1587
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc. 
11/18/20
DFR
12/10/20
Closed

11 
18-1864
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
12/07/20
DFR
12/23/20
Closed

12
18-0242
Onekey, LLC
02/05/21
DFR
02/18/21
Open

13 
18-0731
UHS of Delaware, Inc. and Premier Behavioral Health Solutions of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Suncoast Behavioral Health Center
05/19/21
DFR
05/21/21
Open

14
18-1287
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

15
18-1288
First Marine, LLC
05/19/21
DFR
05/27/21
Closed

16
18-0701
Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.
10/21/21
DFR
11/09/21
Open

17
20-0762
CentiMark Corporation
10/27/21
DFR
11/09/21
Open

18
20-0653
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
10/28/21
DFR
11/05/21
Open

 *DFR – Direction For Review
  REM – Appellate Remand
  INT REV – Interlocutory Review
No. 91-5706.

No. 91-5753.

#### Dean *v.*United States; and Hudson *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below. 932 F. 2d 976.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board of Directors 

Alaska Airlines, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (No. 333-64998) on Form S-3 of Alaska Airlines, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2009, with respect to the balance sheets of Alaska Airlines, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form10-K of Alaska Airlines, Inc. 

As discussed in the notes to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, *Fair Value Measurements*, for financial instruments. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

February 25, 2009
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-15-00322- CV In re The Oaklan ds Ow ners Association, Inc. ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Ba sed o n the rec ord befor e us, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Filed: Jul y

17, 2015
#### In the Matter of WEKIVA DEVELOPMENT CORP., Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 82-440-Orl-BK-P.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M. D. Florida, Orlando Division.

Aug. 2, 1982.

*302ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR SPECIAL MEETING TO ELECT SECURED CREDITORS’ COMMITTEE

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE came on for consideration, ex parte, upon a Motion for Special Meeting to Elect Secured Creditors’ Committee and an Amended Motion for Special Meeting to Elect Secured Creditors’ Committee filed by Hawaiiana Investment Co., Inc., a secured creditor of the above-named Debtor corporation. The amended Motion seeks an Order directing a special meeting for the purpose of electing a secured creditors’ committee pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 214. The Motion seeks an appointment for the purpose of permitting the secured creditors’ committee to perform all functions granted to a committee by 11 U.S.C. § 705(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Court considered the Motion and is satisfied that the Motion is without merit and should be denied for the following reasons.

Bankruptcy Rule 214 authorized the Court to call a special meeting for the purpose of naming a committee of three or more creditors. It provides, however, that only creditors who are entitled to vote for a trustee may elect the committee. It is evident that Bankruptcy Rule 214 has no application in a Chapter 11 case filed under the Code simply because, while a trustee may be appointed in a Chapter 11 case, see § 1104, creditors do not have a right to elect a trustee. The committee in Chapter 11 cases under the Code are dealt with in § 1102(a)(1) of the Code which directs the Court to appoint a committee of creditors holding “unsecured claims.” (emphasis supplied)

In addition, the Section permits, § 1102(a)(2), on request of a party in interest, to order the appointment of additional committees of creditors or of equity security holders. The Section is silent with regard to the rights of secured creditors to form a committee.

In light of the fact that it is rare, indeed, if not non-existent, that the interest of secured creditors are identical, the omission of the Code to provide for the appointment of secured creditors’ committee is understandable. Having concluded that Bankruptcy Rule 214 is in conflict with a specific provision of the Code, therefore, it is not applicable to a Chapter 11 case under the Code and in light of the fact that the Code fails to provide for the appointment of a committee of secured creditors. This Court is satisfied that the Motion is without merit and should be denied.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Amended Motion for Special Meeting to Elect Secured Creditors’ Committee be, and the same hereby is, denied.
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit

No. 97-6306.

Walter HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Joe S. HOPPER, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections,

Defendant-Appellee.

April 25, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Alabama (No. 97-T-476-N), Myron H. Thompson, Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On April 24, 1997, Appellant Walter Hill filed with this Court

a "Motion for Injunction Against Execution Pending Disposition of

Petition for Writ of Certiorari." The motion requests that this

Court enjoin the State of Alabama from executing Hill pending the

United States Supreme Court's disposition of his petition for

certiorari. The petition for certiorari seeks review of a decision

issued by this Court on April 17, 1997. See Hill v. Hopper, ---

F.3d ----, No. 97-6306 (11th Cir. Apr. 17, 1997). On April 25,

1997, the State of Alabama filed a response to Appellant Hill's

motion. After careful consideration, we hereby deny Appellant

Hill's Motion for Injunction.

DENIED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1038 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit prescription 

drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted 

by pharmacies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Mr. GRIFFITH (for himself, Mr. WELCH, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. JONES, 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. BLUM, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. CARTER of 

Georgia, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. BABIN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

BARLETTA, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. HARPER, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. GOODLATTE, 

Mr. DOGGETT, and Mrs. ROBY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

prescription drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted by pharmacies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1038 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Trans3 parency and Accuracy in Medicare Part D Spending Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEDICARE PDP SPONSORS AND MA– 

5 PD ORGANIZATIONS FROM RETROACTIVELY 

6 REDUCING PAYMENT ON CLEAN CLAIMS SUB7 MITTED BY PHARMACIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–12(b)(4)(A) of 

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–112(b)(4)(A)) 

10 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(iv) PROHIBITING RETROACTIVE RE12 DUCTIONS IN PAYMENTS ON CLEAN

13 CLAIMS.—Each contract entered into with 

14 a PDP sponsor under this part with re15 spect to a prescription drug plan offered 

16 by such sponsor shall provide that after 

17 the date of receipt of a clean claim sub18 mitted by a pharmacy, the PDP sponsor 

19 (or an agent of the PDP sponsor) may not 

20 retroactively reduce payment on such claim 

21 directly or indirectly through aggregated 

22 effective rate or otherwise except in the 

23 case such claim is found to not be a clean 

24 claim (such as in the case of a claim lack25 ing required substantiating documentation) 

26 during the course of a routine audit as 


rfrederick on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1038 IH

1 permitted pursuant to written agreement 

2 between the PDP sponsor (or such an 

3 agent) and such pharmacy. The previous 

4 sentence shall not prohibit any retroactive 

5 increase in payment to a pharmacy pursu6 ant to a written agreement between a PDP 

7 sponsor (or an agent of such sponsor) and 

8 such pharmacy.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered 

11 into on or after January 1, 2018. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 25, 2017

No. 04-16-00810-CR

Mario RIOS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR5416

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 18, 2017, court reporter Linda A. Hernandez filed a notice of late reporter’s 

record. The notice states Appellant has not paid the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order that the reporter’s record has been requested and either (1) the reporter’s fee 

has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) Appellant is 

entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. 

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, Appellant’s brief will be due within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in 

Appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(c). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of January, 2017.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of ThermaCell  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on August 21, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, James
Hagarman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ James Hagarman
-------------------------
James Hagarman
Chief Executive Officer
August 21, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK SEDDEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 157 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.