alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wyeth (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009 (the Report), I, Gregory Norden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 26, 2009



By

/s/ Gregory NordenGregory Norden Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Abe of Japan at Pearl Harbor

By Office of the Press SecretaryThe White House

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Blanca Nieto

, * From the 358th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D

- 129810

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00012

- CV * January 30, 2014

Permian Basin Community Centers * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J

. for MHMR, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Bailey, J. , and McCall, sitting by

assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this ap peal

are taxed against Blanca Nieto

.
log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.21 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption; Hydrolysis Half-life = 3.5 hours @ 50 °C and pH 7, 

134.3 hours @ 25 °C and pH 7, 24 hours @ 20 °C and pH 9.

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin and poor through the 

lungs and GI tract (pchem). There is concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to eye 

(test data: corrosive), skin (test data), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant 

properties of the compounds; and liver toxicity based on submitted test data for this compound 

when submitted as There is also concern for neurotoxicity for the quaternary moiety. 

Moderate high concern.

 Test Data: Submitted with 

(-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) oral mouse micronucleus assay; rat oral LD50 = 

912 mg/kg (M), 542 mg/kg (F); rat dermal LD50 = 2.37 mL/kg (F), 6.9 mL/kg (M); corrosive to 

the eye in rabbits; moderate skin irritation in rabbits, persisted to day 14; no skin sensitization in 

guinea pigs using the Magnusson-Kligman assay; rat 28-day oral NOEL = 178 mg/kg (M), 100 

mg/kg (F), signs of GI tract mucosal irritation/corrosion, changes in blood chemistry that may be 

indicative of liver toxicity

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 10

daphnid 48-h LC50 3.4

green algal 96-h EC50 20

fish _ chronic 

value

0.56 ACR 18

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.24 ACR 14

algal _ chronic 

value

5.0 ACR 4

Sewage 

Sludge

3-h EC50 _

Sewage 

Sludge

_ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog method for 

monoalkyl quaternary ammonium cationic surfactants with 12C in linear alkyl hydrophobe; 
SAR chemical class = surfactant-cationic-quat- monoalkyl-C12; MW 342; S = dispersible in 

water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) 

Acute 

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) Chronic

24

SARs cationic surfactants

SAR Class surfactant-cationic-monoalkyl-C

12

TSCA New Chemcial 

Category 

Cationic (quaternary ammonium) 

surfactants

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: 

 Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-45324 and No. 33-57339), S-4 (No. 333-59642), and
S-8 (No. 2-96127, No. 33-24068, No. 33-41434, No. 33-53733, No. 33-55449,
33-45970, No. 33-14458, No. 33-50149, No. 33-55456, No. 333-15509, No.
333-76939, No. 333-67008, No. 333-64154, No. 333-59668, No. 333-89318, No.
333-98619 and No. 333-98623) of Wyeth of our report dated January 27, 2003,
except for Note 16 which is as of March 3, 2003, relating to the financial
statements, which appears in Wyeth's 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders, which
is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 27, 2003 relating
to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
March 28, 2003
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	USINDOPACOM Statement on Unsafe Intercept of U.S. aircraft over South China Sea
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4870" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Joint/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/55/INDOPACOM2018_100x100.png?ver=J6xEsvouw9aaqHcHjhoIIQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">USINDOPACOM Statement on Unsafe Intercept of U.S. aircraft over South China Sea</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Dec. 29, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>On Dec. 21 (China Standard Time), a People’s Liberation Army - Navy J-11 fighter pilot performed an unsafe maneuver during an intercept of a U.S. Air Force RC-135 aircraft, which was lawfully conducting routine operations over the South China Sea in international airspace. The PLAN pilot flew an unsafe maneuver by flying in front of and within 20 feet of the nose of the RC-135, forcing the RC-135 to take evasive maneuvers to avoid a collision.</p>

<p>The U.S. Indo-Pacific Joint Force is dedicated to a free and open Indo-Pacific region and will continue to fly, sail and operate at sea and in international airspace with due regard for the safety of all vessels and aircraft under international law. We expect all countries in the Indo-Pacific region to use international airspace safely and in accordance with international law.</p>

<p>View video here: <div style="text-align:center"><iframe width = "500" height = "300" scrolling = "no" frameborder = "0" style = "border: none; overflow: hidden; width: 500px; height: 300px;" allowtransparency = "true"src = "https://www.dvidshub.net/video/embed/869869" ></iframe></div></p>
<br />
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 28 , 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00014

- CR

Nathaniel Briscoe, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE AND GOODWIN
AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS ORDE RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified

be low for observance.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darvel Beaner, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 51]

Judgment unani*828mously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh and excessive does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal *(see, People v Allen,*82 NY2d 761; *People v Saunders,*190 AD2d 1092, 1093, *lv denied*81 NY2d 1019).

The further contention of defendant that his sentence is illegal is without merit. Although County Court did not expressly state that the periods of six months’ incarceration and five years’ probation to which defendant was sentenced were to run concurrently, the period of probation runs concurrently with the period of imprisonment by operation of law *(see,*Penal Law § 60.01 [2] [d]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analogic Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Millerick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | /S/    JOHN J.
MILLERICK                             
|Date: September 29, 2008 |  | John J. Millerick                                    
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
----

----

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |

| Date:  May 7, 2010 | /s/ Thomas B. Specketer       |   |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Thomas B. Specketer           |   |
|                              | Vice President and Controller |   |
|                              | (principal financial officer) |   |

----

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S337-S338]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

  The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were 
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

           By Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. 
             Martinez):

[[Page S338]]

       S. Res. 13. A resolution congratulating the University of 
     Florida football team for winning the 2008 Bowl Championship 
     Series (BCS) national championship; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.

                          ____________________
```
#### Clifford, Appellant, vs. City of Hartford, Respondent.

*February 12*

March *10, 1931.*

*219For the appellant there was a brief by *Russell & Goetz*of Hartford, and oral argument by /. *C. Russell.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *H. U. Amidon,*city attorney, and *Sawyer & Gehl*of counsel, all of Hartford.

FowleR, J.

The original writing was not a contract signed by both parties binding the plaintiff to sell and the *220defendant to purchase. It was only an option signed by the plaintiff and imposed no obligation on the defendant. The resolution of the common council of June ,7th did not purport to be an acceptance of the option. It merely expressed the then intention of the council that it would purchase certain property therein described. But that purchase would not and could not be consummated until and unless the intention was followed up by acceptance of a deed. The council might and did change its collective mind for reasons satisfactory to itself and concluded not to purchase. Thus no contract to purchase was ever entered into by the city. The plaintiff has no right to specific performance of a contract for the very simple reason that a contract was never made. Nor did obligation to pay the $2,500 arise from the resolution of the council. Such obligation could only arise from acceptance of a deed. On such acceptance, liability to pay the consideration named in the deed would arise, but the obligation would rest on the deed itself. All this seems so plain as not to require citation of authorities to support it.

Counsel for plaintiff urge that the city is estopped to accept the deed because the city attorney put the plaintiff to the trouble of going to his office to sign it. Merely going down town would be too slight a thing to adjudge specific performance upon, even if estoppel could be successfully invoked to compel specific performance of a contract when there was no contract. Estoppel may be the basis in equity for precluding one from interposing as a defense to specific performance the invalidity of agreements for want of requisite legal formalities or the like. But this principle has no application here. And in actions for specific performance compulsion is usually, if not always, a matter of discretion rather than of right.

By *the Court*— The judgment is affirmed.'
AFS-12-379-E May 31, 2012

Exemption No. 10553 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0544

Ms. Tracy McGinnis

Parent of Brendan B. McGinnis 5960 Dudley Court Arvada, CO 80004

Dear Ms. McGinnis:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 14, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Brendan McGinnis for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Brendan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Brendan.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security2

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Brendan McGinnis exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Brendan is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Brendan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Brendan’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Brendan McGinnis may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Brendan’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H203]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 SCHIP

  (Mr. PETERS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. PETERS. Madam Speaker, today the House will consider legislation 
to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Program and provide 
health insurance coverage for more than 11 million children nationwide.
  The current recession makes this legislation particularly important. 
Children living in low-income families in Michigan rose a staggering 40 
percent between 2000 and 2007. Parents are losing their jobs and their 
health insurance. And kids who do not have health coverage forgo 
regular checkups and preventive t reatments. They miss more school 
days, and are less likely to finish high school. And untreated health 
problems can severely impact a young child's development. SCHIP 
provides a lifeline for children so that they can be healthy kids who 
have the opportunity to grow into healthy productive adults.
  The SCHIP bill we will consider today is fiscally responsible. It is 
more cost-effective for taxpayers to provide proper care for our kids 
rather than footing the bill for unnecessary emergency room visits. 
Passing this legislation is the right thing to do for our Nation's 
kids.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          26,581
<SECURITIES>                                    80,816
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,944)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,469
<PP&E>                                          99,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                (55,020)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 188,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,142
<BONDS>                                         10,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   188,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,030
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,030
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>