alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
04-14-2011 03:19pm De-LA IRIZARRY AND ASSO +7872763846 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES 

JEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON D.C 

T-Z97 P.001/003 F-169 

Application 01 DOCKET: OST~97-3077 -

Servicios Aer?Os ProfesfOnale$ S.A 

For a foreign air carrier oerr'"ut 

pursuant to Section 402 01 :he 

Federal A vi at on Act of -! 958 as amendect 

REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

Communication with feSDec to this document should be sent to: 

Luis A. lrizarr,f 

Aviation Con3ultant 

L.A. Irizarry c. Associates, Inc 

P.O. Box 37: 17 Airport S1atior 

San Juan, Puerto Rico P R. 00937-0217 

Tel: (787) 75.2-7621 

Fax: (787) 2~ 5·3846 

NOTICE: An" person rna" 5UpOOn- or approved this application by filing an answer with the 

Documentar:: Service Divisior . .)epartment of~ransportation, within 15 days and serving a copy 

of the answe' on all persons listed in the service Jist attached to this applicant 

Date: April 4, 201'-
04-14-Z011 03: 19pm De-LA IRIZARRY AND ASSO +7872763846 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES 

VEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON 

WASHINGTON D_C 

----- .--- --------

T-Z9i p.OOZ/003 F-169 

Application cf DOCKET.- OST-97-3077-

Servicios Ae-eos Profesionales S.f!-

For a foreigr air carrier Dermv 

pursuant to ~~ect;on 402 of ~he 

Federal Avia:ion Act of ~952 as amended 

,-----._-- ----_ .. 

REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

COMES NO'Iii!, SERVICIOS AEREOS PROFESIONALES, S.A_ (SAPSA) thru the undersigned, 

and formally -equest an extenSIOp. of time to respond to the request for update information letter. 

1. SAIJSA is obta~n!ng a\t the available accounting information from its accountant, but 

due to the tirr e of the year wfllct" we have to present the taxes to the government SA PSA will 

need addition al time to comolete the information and provided to the Department. 

2. Th;::t SAPSA formal/\( ~uest an extension of at least 30 days to complete the 

information and answer the ::::>eoartment in a prooer manner. 

WHEREFORE, SAPSA resoectfully request the Department to grant an extension of at least 30 

days. 

Respectfully submitted this .Aon; ~ 4. 201 -:. 

s . 

L.A. Irizarry & ssoci 

P.O. Box 37217 / 

San Juan, P,R. 

Tel (787) 752-76?1 

Fax: (787) 276-3'846 
04-14-2011 03:19pm De-LA IRIZARRY AND ASSO +7872763846 T-297 P.003/003 F-169 

CERTlFICll -E OF SERViCE 

I hereby cer:ify that the foregoing Application for Renewal for Exemption has been mailed by 

Regular Ma~1 to all persons ana entities shown on the attached service list in accordance with 

the Departrr'ent procedures rf':qulations 

SERVICE LSi 

Department of T ransportatior 

Office of thE Secretary 

400 Sevent!-, Street, N. \/'v 

Washington DC 2059C,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

lN THE MATTER OF: DocketNo. FAA-2015-3320 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, lNC
.. FAA Case No. 2012S0700374 Respondent Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan

COMPLAINANT'S JOINT RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDE PROCEEDINGS AND REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE HEARING VENUE AND THE COURT'S APRIL 5, 2016 ORDER
Pursuantto Section 14 C.F.R. § 13.218(d), Complainant, by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby files this Joint Response to Respondent's Motionto Consolidate Proceedings and Request for Alternate Hearing Venue, served on April 1, 2016, and the Court's Order served AprilS, 2016. In support ofthis response, Complainant offers the following: I. Consolidation Complainant opposes the Motionto Consolidate at this time, as it is premature to consider such a motion. Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure Rule 42 allows for the court to consolidate cases that have "commonquestions oflaw or fact." Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). While there are some issues in this matter that are common withthe other two complaints, this is not unusual. However, the facts in each ofthe three complaints involve different incidents on different dates, with shipments that originated from different locations involving different hazardous materials. The complaints are only2 related inthat they assert UPS, Inc. violated the Hazardous Material Regulations ineach
case. Without an Answer, Complainant is unable to knowwhat "related" issues actually exist and ifconsolidation is reasonable. Additionally, consolidation will not remove the obligationthat UPS, Inc. has to respond to the allegations found ineach ofthe complaints. Therefore, Complainant asks the court to deny the Motionto Consolidate. III. Venue Complainant consents to Respondent's request for venue inLouisville, Kentucky. IV. ProperParty The proper Respondent inthis matter is United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS Ground). Complainant is neither claiming violations by, nor seeking a civil penalty from, United Parcel Service Co. (UPS Airlines). To the extent that United Parcel Service Co. (UPS Airlines) is inadvertently a party to this matter, Complainant moves that United Parcel Service Co. (UPS Airlines) be dismissed.
Respectfully submittedthis 11th day ofApril, 2016. 

# Ryan Landers Attorney Southern Team EnforcementDivision (AGC-300)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing has beenmailedthis date by Federal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration (original+ 1 copy in each case) 600 Independence A venue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 Administrative LawJudge J. E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Meaghan GoodwinBoyd meaghan.boyd@aiston.com Alston & BirdLLP 1201 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 FROSTBROWNTODD LLC Winston E. Miller wmiller@fbtlaw.com Miles 

### R. Harrison mharrison@fblaw.com 400 W. Market Street, 32nd Fl. Louisville, KY40202 Paul Alp Crowell & MoringLLP 1001 PennsylvaniaAve.,NW Washington DC 20004-2595

# ~A~&: Program Analyst

Dated 3
Order entered August 25, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00696-CV 

PAULA WICKLIFFE, Appellant 

V. 

CHARLES TOOLEY, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. PR-14-04150-1 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we MODIFY the trial court’s May 12, 2015 

order and reduce the amount of the supersedeas bond to $5,400. In all other respects, we 

AFFIRM the trial court’s order. 

We LIFT the stay imposed by this Court’s order dated June 26, 2015. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
us. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation ·;::.:.·.f, : '·)\1 a 0 I- 53 '-·'.';i - t. .. 

MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET 2009-0155 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

On September 15, 2010, the Secretary of Transportation received a call from Senator Klobuchar 

on several transportation issues. One of the issues was the application of Delta Air Lines and the 

Virgin Blue group for antitrust immunity. Senator Klobuchar expressed her support for Delta's 

application and encouraged the Secretary to grant the antitrust immunity requested. The 

Secretary listened to Senator Klobuchar and thanked her for the call.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------

                     ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                                State or
                                                                 Other
                                                             Jurisdiction
                                                                  of
         Subsidiary                                          Incorporation
         ----------                                          -------------

Alberto-Culver (Australia) Pty. Ltd.                         Australia
Alberto-Culver Canada, Inc.                                  Canada
Alberto-Culver Company (U.K.), Limited                       United Kingdom
Alberto-Culver International, Inc.                           Delaware
Alberto-Culver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico
Alberto-Culver (P.R.), Inc.                                  Delaware
Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.                                     Delaware
Beauty Systems Group, Inc.                                   Delaware
Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc.                          Canada
BDM Grange, Ltd.                                             New Zealand
Cederroth International AB                                   Sweden
CIFCO, Inc.                                                  Delaware
Indola Cosmetics, B.V.                                       The Netherlands
IHB SpA                                                      Italy
La Farmaco Argentina I. y C.S.A.                             Argentina
Pro-Line International, Inc.                                 Delaware
Sally Beauty Company, Inc.                                   Delaware
Soraya, S.A.                                                 Poland
St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.                                  Delaware


Subsidiaries of the company omitted from the above table, considered in the
aggregate, would not be considered significant.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22256-22257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09215]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9101]

U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law (ACPIL): Public Meeting on Insolvency-Related 
Judgments and Enterprise Group Insolvency Issues

    The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International 
Law, Department of State, gives notice of a public meeting to discuss 
ongoing work in the United Nations Commission on International Trade 
Law (UNCITRAL) related to the recognition and enforcement of 
insolvency-derived judgments and the insolvency of cross-border 
enterprise groups. The public meeting will take place on Monday, May 
11, 2015 from 9:30 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. EDT. This is not a meeting of 
the full Advisory Committee.
    In 2014, the UNCITRAL Commission gave Working Group V a mandate to 
develop a model law or model legislative provisions on the recognition 
and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments. The Working Group 
began

[[Page 22257]]

its discussions of this topic in December 2014. For the report of this 
session, see document A/CN.9/829, available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/commission/working_groups/5Insolvency.html.
    Also at its December 2014 session, Working Group V continued its 
efforts to address enterprise group insolvency issues. It plans to 
develop model legislative provisions that would facilitate the cross-
border insolvency of enterprise group members, addressing topics such 
as provision of access to foreign courts for representatives and 
creditors of insolvency proceedings involving enterprise group members, 
provision of standing for group members to participate in the 
insolvency proceedings of other members, the use of synthetic 
proceedings, and appropriate forms of relief.
    The purpose of the public meeting is to obtain the views of 
concerned stakeholders on draft instruments prepared by the UNCITRAL 
Secretariat on both topics: The recognition and enforcement of 
insolvency-related judgments and the insolvency of cross-border 
enterprise groups. The drafts will be posted by the Secretariat at 
http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/commission/working_groups/5Insolvency.html
    Time and Place: The meeting will take place on May 11, 2015, from 
9:30 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. via a teleconference. Those who cannot 
participate but wish to comment are welcome to do so by email to Tim 
Schnabel at SchnabelTR@state.gov.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to participate by telephone, please email pil@state.gov to 
obtain the call-in number and other information.

    Dated: April 9, 2015.
Timothy R. Schnabel,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of Legal 
Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-09215 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject:. Bill & Cheryl Crawford <dinksink@gmail.com> Friday, August 03, 2012 1:27 PM Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Sky West to RHI 

### ··b Saw the article about RHI in the Lakeland Times this A.M.. Wywife and I vote for SkyWest! So does our son, thepilot, who flies for Sky West out ofDenver. Also, it is a hell ofa lot easier-to get round MSP than 0 Hare. Please decide on SkyWest. Bill & Cheryl Crawford, Harshaw, WI

1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Absolute Potential, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:

          1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Thomas F. Duszynski
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas F. Duszynski
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date: March 23, 2007

     This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Jackson, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 424]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 21, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree (four counts), burglary in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his constitutional and statutory right to be present at the suppression hearing *(see,*CPL 260.20; *People v Morales,*80 NY2d 450; *People v Anderson,*16 NY2d 282), was not violated after the hearing court continued the hearing in his absence. The defendant’s presence is required only where it has "a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend [himself]” *(Snyder v Massachusetts,*291 US 97, 106; *see also, People v Velasco,*77 NY2d 469, 472). Because the proceeding related solely to issues regarding the codefendant, the defendant’s presence would have been meaningless.

Further, the sentencing court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences with respect to two counts of felony murder. Although the two victims’ deaths may have occurred in the course of a single extended transaction, separate acts caused their deaths and neither act was a material act of the other *(see,*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; *People v Truesdall,*70 NY2d 809). Nor was the defendant’s sentence excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Te*
      *676
      *vaha,*84 NY2d 879; *People v Hopkins,*76 NY2d 872; *People v Medina,*53 NY2d 951; *People v Tutt,*38 NY2d 1011) or do not require reversal. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-84292,Form S-3 No. 333-74937 and Form S-3 No. 333-110760-01) of American Airlines, Inc., and in therelated Prospectus, of our reports dated February 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of American Airlines, Inc., American Airlines management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of American Airlines, included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.**/s/ Ernst & Young LLP**Dallas, Texas
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 21293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08696]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services; Sunshine Act Meeting of 
the National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises 
the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services on general 
policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authority of the 
Institute relating to museum, library and information services, will 
meet on May 8, 2014.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, May 8, 2014, from 2:30 to 6:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Institute of Museum and Library 
Services, 1800 M Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036. 
Telephone: (202) 653-4798.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

AGENDA: Twenty-Ninth Meeting of the National Museum and Library Service 
Board Meeting:

I. Welcome
II. Financial Update
III. Legislative Update
IV. Program Updates
V. Research Update
VI. Board Program
VII. Board Discussion
VIII. Adjournment

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Program Specialist, 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676. Please provide advance 
notice of any special needs or accommodations.

    Dated: April 9, 2014.
Andrew Christopher,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-08696 Filed 4-11-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Douglas J. Cahill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Doane Pet CareCompany, hereby certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Doane Pet CareCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004    /s/ DOUGLAS J. CAHILL  Douglas J. Cahill President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Doane Pet Care Company