alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|   | May 1, 2006 | /s/ Graham V. Smith                                            |   |
|--------|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |        | Graham V. Smith                                                |
|   |        | Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will beretained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### R. L. DIBBRELL et al. v. THE GEORGIA HOME INSURANCE COMPANY.

*Printing Record*— Rules—Practice *in Supreme Court.*

When a- printed brief is filed under Rule 12, the party filing it is to be taken as asking a decision at such term and as opposing a continuance, and a motion by the opiiosite party t,o continue the case till next term will not be granted unless expressly assented to, or for good cause shown.

MotioN of plaintiff in Supreme Court to strike out order of continuance.

*Mr. A. C. Zollicoffer*(by brief), for plaintiffs. .

*Mr. J. W. Hinsdale,*for defendant.

*315Clark, J.:

Rule 12 of this Court provides: “'When a case is reached on the regular call of the docket, and a printed brief or argument shall be filed for either party, the case shall stand on the same footing as if there were an appearance by counsel.” When this cause was reached in the regular call of the docket there was a printed brief on file for plaintiff’s counsel, udio was not present. The defendant’s counsel, who was in Court, moved for a continuance, which was granted, not for any good cause, but because unopposed.

The plaintiff’s counsel moves to strike out the continuance, and that the cause stand for decision at this term. His contention is, that by going to the expense of printing and filing a brief, he gave notice that he desired and expected the cause to be disposed of at this term, and that the rule would be of practically little benefit to counsel not residing in Raleigh if, notwithstanding, they must attend in person to prevent the continuance ef their cases at the mere motion of the opposite party.

It seems to us that this contention is just, and is based on the proper construction of the rule. When the counsel files his printed brief that is his argument submitted to the Court, and the case stands for decision without further argument, unless he shall see fit to also aid us with an oral argument, or the other side shall present an oral or printed argument, when the case is called. When good cause is shown in support of a motion for continuance, the Court will grant it, whether the opposite party is represented by counsel in person or by brief, but such was not the case here.

The motion for a continuance was improvidently granted and must be stricken out. The counsel for defendant did not submit an oral argument when he had the opportunity, and he cannot do so now, as the district has been passed. The plaintiff is, however, not to be deprived of his right to have the case disposed of at this term, and the defendant *316will be allowed ten days from the filing of this opinion to submit a printed brief.

This is the first occasion on which the construction of this rule has been before the Court, and the embarrassment arising as to the conflicting rights of the parties, consequent upon the improper granting of the continuance, cannot again occur.

Motion allowed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

NET INCOME AND COMMON SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
FOR THE FIVE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 WERE COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS (AMOUNTS IN
THOUSANDS). THE 1993 THROUGH 1996 COMPUTATIONS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM TO
THE PROVISIONS OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS
PER SHARE".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                -----------------------------------------------------
                                                  1993        1994       1995       1996      1997
                                                --------    --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>     
Earnings:
---------
     Net Income                                 $ 24,127    $ 29,194   $ 32,639   $ 13,066   $ 23,349

     Less preferred stock dividends (1)           (2,180)       --         --           --         --
                                                --------    --------   --------   --------   --------
     Net income applicable to common
        stock - Basic                           $ 21,947    $ 29,194   $ 32,639   $ 13,066   $ 23,349

     Add:  Preferred stock dividends               2,180        --         --           --         --
               Convertible debenture interest        693         296       --         --           --
                                                --------    --------   --------   --------   --------
     Net income applicable to
        Common stock - Diluted                  $ 24,820    $ 29,490   $ 32,639   $ 13,066   $ 23,349
                                                ========    ========   ========   ========   ========
Common Shares:
--------------
     Weighted average common
        Shares outstanding - Basic                22,302      25,574     26,166     26,470     26,920
     Additional common shares issuable for:
        Assumed exercise of stock options            638         496        754        590        420
        Convertible securities                     3,410         356        125         --         --
                                                --------    --------   --------   --------   --------
     Common shares - Diluted                      26,350      26,426     27,045     27,060     27,340
                                                ========    ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>



(1)  In 1993, the Company exercised its redemption rights; however, prior to the
     planned redemption date, 2,289,615 shares of convertible Preferred Stock
     were converted into 4,579,230 shares of Common Stock of the Company.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

           WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the "Company"), proposes
shortly to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the
provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended (the "Act"), the Annual
Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.

           WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the
Company as indicated below;


           NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints R.
Millington, D. McAusland and P. Chenard and each of them, as attorneys for the
undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, and in each of the
undersigned's offices and capacities as an Officer and/or a Director of the
Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving and
granting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and
every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about
the premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be
done, by virtue hereof.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of
March 2002.

                                             /s/ W.R.C. Blundell
                                             --- --- ----------------
                                             Name:   W.R.C. Blundell
                                             Title:  Director
---

Exhibit 32




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Mymetics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July 6, 2012
By:
/s/ Grant PickeringPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: July 6, 2012
By:
/s/ Ronald KempersPrincipal Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
     and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
     undersigned officer of American Science & Engineering, Inc., a
     Massachusetts corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
     officer's knowledge and belief, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
     for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K
     fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul Theodore Owens
---------------------------
PAUL THEODORE OWENS

VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

JULY 29, 2003
Order entered September 3 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 21 - 00356 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 0035 7 - CR No. 05 - 21 - 00 453 - CR JEREMIAH LEE REEVES , Appellant V. THE STATE OF T EXA S , Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 20 - 41144 - M , F15 - 24191 - M & F16 - 24469 - M O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Belinda Baraka ’ s September 2, 2021 request for additional time to file the report er ’ s record in th ese appeal s . We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter ’ s record filed by October 1 , 2021. We caution Ms. Baraka that further requests are disfavored. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Order entered May 9, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00321-CR

MICHAEL FOY WALLING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-83626-2017

ORDER

In accordance with the parties’ request in this appeal, we ORDER the trial 

court to recalculate proper court costs in this case (1) employing the statutory 

framework in place on the date of appellant’s offense, December 27, 2016, and (2) 

deleting any time payment fee assessed.

We ORDER Lynne Finley, Collin County District Clerk, to file—within 

three weeks of the date of this order—a supplemental clerk’s record including the 

trial court’s order assessing the recalculated court costs.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable John Roach, Jr., Judge of Collin County’s 296th District Court, to Lynne 

Finley, and to the parties. 

We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply 

with this order. The appeal will be reinstated three weeks after the date of this 

order or when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed, whichever occurs sooner. 

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 23(1)

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-77318) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan of
American Biltrite Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84667)
pertaining to the 1993 Stock Award and Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as
of March 4, 1997 of American Biltrite Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-84669) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of American Biltrite Inc., of our report dated April 10, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American
Biltrite Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 10, 2003


                                      103
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1168 

To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 

United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted 

active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, and other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. LANCE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. 

DINGELL, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Ms. 

HANABUSA, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. KEATING, and Mr. 

POLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that service of the members of the organization 

known as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during 

World War II constituted active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, and other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1168 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Cadet 

3 Nurse Corps Equity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SERVICE DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE MILITARY SERV5 ICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 

7 401(a)(1)(A) of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (38 

8 U.S.C. 106 note), the Secretary of Defense is deemed to 

9 have determined that qualified service of a person con10 stituted active military service. 

11 (b) DETERMINATION OF DISCHARGE STATUS.—The 

12 Secretary of Defense shall issue an honorable discharge 

13 under section 401(a)(1)(B) of the GI Bill Improvement 

14 Act of 1977 to each person whose qualified service war15 rants an honorable discharge. Such discharge shall be 

16 issued before the end of the one-year period beginning on 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE BENEFITS. 

19 No benefits may be paid to any person as a result 

20 of the enactment of this Act for any period before the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act. 

22 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

23 In this Act, the term ‘‘qualified service’’ means serv24 ice of a person as a member of the organization known 

25 as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during the period 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1168 IH

1 beginning on July 1, 1943, and ending on December 31, 

2 1948. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of China Digital Animation
Development Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December
31,  2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









February
      25, 2010
            /s/ Fu
      QiangFu
      Qiang, Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      25, 2010
            /s/ Hu
      YumeiHu
      Yumei, Chief Financial Officer







This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6573

LARRY JOE STEVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; JOHN B. METZGER, III,

Chairman; SANDRA L. COMBS; LINDA R. PITMAN;

WINNIE D. DIXON; JOSEPH F. LEWIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-240-AM)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Joe Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Stevens v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-96-240-AM (E.D. Va.

Feb. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21



                                                             State of
        Subsidiary
        Incorporation

        AMREP Metro Services, Inc.                         New York
        AMREP Saratoga Construction, Inc.                  New York
        AMREP Solutions, Inc.                              New York
        AMREP Southwest Inc.                               New Mexico
            Advance Financial Corp.                        New Mexico
            AMREP Construction Corporation                 New Mexico
            AMREP Financial Corp.                          New Mexico
            AMREP Metro Works, Inc.                        New York
               PERMA Corp.                                 New York
                  Strickland Construction Corp.            New Jersey
            AMREP Southeast, Inc.                          Florida
               AMREP Saratoga Square Homes, Inc.           Florida
            AMREPCO Inc.                                   Colorado
            Carity-Hoffman Associates, Inc.                New York
            Double R Realty, Inc.                          New Mexico
            Eldorado at Sante Fe, Inc.                     New Mexico
            M.F.G. Realty Corp.                            New York
            New Mexico Foreign Trade Zone Corp.            New Mexico
            Panorama Inn of Florida, Inc.                  Florida
            Rancho Homes, Inc.                             New Mexico
            Rio Rancho Golf & Country Club, Inc.           New Mexico
            S.G.R. Realty Corp.                            New Jersey
            Shasta Real Estate Company                     California
            Sun Oaks Realty Corp.                          Florida
            Rio Venture Corp.                              New Mexico
            Rio Venture XV, Inc.                           New Mexico
        El Dorado Utilities, Inc.                          New Mexico
        Florida Ridge Utilities Corp.                      Florida
        Kable News Company, Inc.                           Illinois
            Kable Fulfillment Services of Ohio, Inc.       Delaware
            Kable News Company of Canada, Ltd.             Ontario, Canada
            Kable News Export, Ltd.                        Delaware
            Kable News International, Inc.                 Delaware
-  Resources 
          A-Z Index
Annual Reports
Budget and Planning
Careers at OSMRE
Coalex Reports
Education & Outreach
FAQs
Federal Assistance Manual
Forms
Glossary
Grants
Reclamation Bonds
Sustainability
Tribal Consultation
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

# Sustainability 

## Reducing Single-Use Plastic Pollution

The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) is taking action aligned with Secretary's Order 3407, *Department-Wide Approach to Reducing Plastic Pollution*, which aims to reduce the procurement, sale, and distribution of single-use plastic products and packaging with a goal of phasing out all single-use plastic products on Department-managed lands by 2032. 

For more information, including OSMRE's FY 2023 Sustainable Procurement Plan, please navigate to the Department of the Interior's Reducing Single-Use Plastic Pollution resource. 

 

For questions about OSMRE Sustainability, please message: 

OSM-GetInfo@osmre.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6696
ANTONIO LAMONE DUNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS P. SWAIN; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,North Carolina Division; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-59) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Lamone Dunson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dunson v. Swain , No. CA-96-59 (E.D.N.C. March 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED