# Final Effluent Pond Sludge Sampling and Analysis Plan

BWX Technologies, Inc.

, Mt. Athos Site

Lynchburg, Virginia

Prepared by:



## BWXTechnologies. Inc.



# June 2004 

# PRI APPROVED JUN: 16- 2004

# c1.-~.~ 

# ..**-~** ESH&S ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 

### DATE

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 

## 6/10/04 

# EXHIBIT 7 ( 

# FINAL EFFLUENT POND SLUDGE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN I. Overview To provide a comprehensive sludge sampling strategy ofthe Final Effluent Pond (PEP), a twophase sampling plan is proposed. Phase 1 Will collect sludge from four representative locations in each pond and analyze the samples for the comprehensive list ofchemical compounds and other analytical parameters shown in Table 1. The analytical parameter list includes the 40 Code ofFederal Regulations 264 Appendix IX (Groundwater Monitoring List) analytes for the metal, volatile organic compound (VOC), semivolatile organic compound, polychlorinated biphenyl, and dioxin/furan groups. Excluded from the analyte list because ofprocess knowledge are the herbicide and pesticide groupings ofcompounds. Three additional compounds from the 40 Code ofFederal Regulations Appendix 

# vrn (Hazardous Constituent List) are included based onprocess knowledge: dibutyl phthalate, acetone, and formaldehyde. Other analytical parameters will include total oil and grease, fluoride, cyanide, total sulfide, water content, corrosivity, and**igni~bility.** 

## The Phase 1 testing will include analyses for both (a) total concentrations and 

## (b) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)-extractable concentrations. Past sampling ofthe sludges 

## has shown them to have a high water content. Therefore, chemical concentrations will 

# ( be reported on a wet-weight basis. 

## In addition to the standard TCLP extraction, one Phase 1 sample from each pond will be subjected to extract testing at two additional pH values. The multiple pH extract testing will follow the recommendations in the EPA RCRA DelistingProgram, Guidance Manual for the Petitioner, March 2000. Besides the standard extract described in TCLP Method 1311, the sludge will be extracted at two other pH values and analyzed. The two alternate extract fluids will be:
• . Distilled deionized 

## (OI) water 

## • An alkaline solution ofsodium hydroxide with a pH between 10 and 12. The Phase 1 samples for the multiple pH extractions will be collected from the sampling location that is anticipated to have the greatest sludge thickness. Exhibit 7-A presents the map ofpond sediment (i.e., sludge) depth determined in a 1993 study ofthe FEPs. The TCLP extractions and the multiple·pH extractions will be analyzed for all constituents, except total sulfide, total oil and grease, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) characteristics ofignitability and corrosivity. Note that organics that are not detected in the total analyses do**n~t** 

## need to be analyzed in the TCLP and multiple
. pH extracts. Phase 2 will collect samples from more numerous locations that are randomly selected according to the method recommended for surface impoundments 

## in EPA RCRA Delisting Program, 

## 1

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04

/' 

## Guidance Manual for the Petitioner, 

## March 2000. The Phase 2 samples will be analyzed for a subset ofanalytes to be detennined bythe Phase 1 results, as described in Section IV.C. 

## II. Sampling Locations The plan for sampling the FEP sludges is to collect a sufficient number ofsamples using an unbiased approach to characterize the material in the ponds. The sampling plan accounts for potential vertical and horizontal variability in the sludge. Horizontal variability is accounted for in the sampling strategy ofeach pond, as described later in this section. Vertical variability ofthe sludge will be addressed bytaking a representative sample from the full thickness ofsludge at each sampling location. Volatile organic compounds (VOC) will be analyzed on a subsample taken from the middle portion ofthe sludge core. The remainder ofthe core will be homogenized and sampled for the other analytical parameters.



## _

A.
.Phase 1 Sampling Locations To obtain a representative sampling ofeach pond for the Phase 1 analysis, a systematic sampling approach will be used. Each pond will be divided into four approximately equal surface areas, and the center ofeach area will be sampled. The total number ofsamples will be eight, four from FEPI and four from FEP2. The sludge from each sample location will be analyzed as an independent sample. 

## B. Phase 2 Sampling Locations B.1 Phase 2 Overview Sample locations for Phase 2 are selected using the random sampling selection process for surface impoundments as described inEPA ReRA 

## DelistingProgram, Guidance Manual for the Petitioner, 

## March 2000. First, the total area ofeach pond is detennined. Secondly, each pond is divided into equal sampling sections ofless than or equal to 10,000 square feet (sq ft) (FEPI will be divided into 7 sections and FEP2 into 6 sections). Thirdly, each 10,000-sq-ft section

- is divided into a grid of**~quares** 

## orrectangles roughly 10 feet on each side. Finally, a random numbertable is used to select four squares for sampling within each section. Each ofthe four locations within a section will be sampled for sludge, and the four sludge cores from each section will be composited into a single sample for analysis (except for VOCs). The resulting number ofsamples for analysis will be 7 from FEPI and 6 from FEP2. However, ifVOC analysis is necessary in Phase 2 (depending on the Phase 1 results), then a single sample from the middle ofeach sludge core will be submitted for VOC analysis. In 

## this case, there will be 28 samples fQr VOC analysis from FEPI and 24 from FEP2, in addition to the 7 samples from FEP1 and 6 from FEP2 that are given full analysis.

2

## 6/10/04 BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition B.2 Determination ofSurface Area 

## ( FEPI is ofan irregular shape, and its surface area is 68,500 sq ft. FEP2 is rectangular, and its approximate surface area is 54,800 sq ft. Plan views and surface area calculations for the FEPs
' are presented in Exhibit 7-B. 

## B.3 Determination ofSampling Sections FEP1 is divided into seven (7) 1O,000-sq-ft sections. Due to the irregular shape ofFEP1, the surface area ofthe sections varies from approximately 9,559 to 9,853 sq ft. The sampling section layout for FEP1 is presented in Exhibit 7-C. FEP2 is divided into six (6) equal sections, each having a surface area of9,133 sq ft. The sampling section layout for FEP2 is presented in Exhibit 7-D. 

# c. Determination ofPhase 2 Sample Locations Each ofthe sampling sections is divided into squares orrectangles (hereafter referred to as "squares") approx- imately 10 feet on a side. Due to the irregular shape ofsome sections ofFEP1, some ofthe squares varied from 10 feet in size. The squares are consecutively numbered from 1 to 100, beginning in the northwest comer ofthe section and proceeding east, then south. The random number table presented in

## EPA ReRA 

## DelistingProgram, Guidance Manual for the Petitioner, March 2000, is used to randomly select four squares for sampling within each section. 

# ( The table is presented in Exhibit 7-E. Sampling points will be located in the centers ofthe squares. Each ofthe sampling points selected using the random number table was assigned a unique coordinate address, measured in feet to the east and to the south from the northwest comer ofthe pond to the center ofthe square selected bythe random number table (e.g., [S3, E7] is the point 7 feet east and 3 feet south ofthe northwest comer ofFEP2, the center ofsquare 01 ofSection 1 ofFEP2, selected bythe random number table for sampling). 

## C.l FEPI FEP1 has 28 Phase 2 sampling locations. The sampling location layout for FEP1 is presented in Exhibit 7-C. Table 2 presents the coordinates for the Phase 2

- sampling locations 

## at FEPI. 

## C.2 FEP2 FEP2 has 24 Phase 2 sampling locations. The sampling location layout for FEP2 is presented in Exhibit 7-D. Table 3 presents the coordinates for the Phase 2 sampling locations at FEP2.



## 3

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6110/04 

## ( 

## Ill. Sample Collection

- Phases 1 and 2 The sludge-sampling method described in this plan is the same that was used for the 1993 study, except no samples for VOC analysis were collected in the previous work. 

## A. Field Health and Safety The most recent revision to the site-specific health and safety plan prepared for the RCRA corrective action program at the Mt. Athos site will be used to guide implementation ofthe sample collection activity 

## (Site-Specific Health and Safety PlanforBWX Technologies, Inc, Mt. Athos Facility, Lynchburg, Virginia, August 6, 2003). Prior to the fieldwork: the health and safetyplan will be reviewed to ensure that it addresses hazards particular to the work described in this sampling plan. 

## B. Sampling Rig and Navigation Method A sampling rig will be fabricated from two boats positioned in opposing directions, stem to stem, clamped together using lumber and 

# "c" clamps to give a working length ofapproximately 26 feet for the equipment and two sampling technicians. A rope aligned in a north-south direction will be strung across the pond to pull the vessel to the designated sample locations. To guide the boat rig, rows ofpin flags spaced 50 feet apart will be set up, aligned north-south and east-west along the pond sides.
. 

## C. Sampling Equipment and Preparation Samples will be taken using new, clearpolycarbonate tubes with a wall thickness of 1116 inch. A typical tube diameter is 

## 2-5/8 inches, but other diameters maybe used. A cap or stopper will be used to seal the sample tube after each sample is taken. The polycarbonate sampling tubes will be decontaminated prior to collecting samples. Personnel will wear new latex gloves when handling samples or sampling equipment. Sampling tubes will beprepared as follows:
• DI water rinse • Liquinox® soap solution wash • DI water rinse, twice • Dilute nitric acid solution rinse • Final DI water rinse • Air dried and wrapped in aluminum foil.



## 4

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04 

## D. Sample Handling Area ( A work area will be established to decontaminate the sampling equipment and to prepare and process the samples for transport to the laboratory. The area will include separate tables for sample collection preparation and sample processing, DI water, cleaning chemicals, a container for solid waste, and a vessel for liquid waste. The solid waste will be disposed ofas 

## dry, lowlevel radioactive (LLR) mixed waste, and the liquid waste will be treated at the LLR Waste Treatment Facility. 

## E. Sampling Method Sludge samples will be collected as follows: 1. At each sample location, the polycarbonate tubing will be pushed through the sludge layers and twisted forcefully into the clay layer onthe bottom ofthe pond. The stiffclay will serve as a plug to keep the sample in the tube and as a visual confinnation that the base ofthe sludge is reached. 2. Ifthe sludge is thin at all four sampling locations within a section, then more 

## than one sludge core will be collected from each ofthose sampling locations, to obtain enough material to perform all the analyses on the composited sample. 

## In such case, the same number ofcores will be collected from all four sampling locations within a section, and all the tubes will be composited (this is to ensure that the final composite is representative ofthe sludge throughout the section). See Table 11 for sample volumes and QC sample requirements. 3. A cap or stopper will be inserted on the top end ofthe sample tube to serve as a seal to retain the sample as the tube is withdrawn from the bottom ofthe pond. The tube containing the sample will be lifted at an angle to reduce the downward pressure on the column. 4. The sample tube will be held over the side ofthe boat, and the outside ofthe sample tube will berinsed with DI water. The sample end cap will be wrapped with heavy polypropylene tape to ensure that the sample will not fall out ofthe tube during handling. 5. The sample tubes will be numbered in accordance with the pond number and the coordinates, as previouslypresented. 6. Immediately after sample collection, the total sludge depth will be measured, including measurements ofany stratification in the sample. The sludge will be described for color and any other visual characteristics, looking through the polycarbonate tube wall. The total sludge depth and description will be recorded on a Sample Collection Log. A hole will be drilled in the sample tube at the top ofthe sediment layer to allow the water column above the sample to weep out ofthe rube. The sludge description may be annotated the following day, after the frozen sludge core is extruded from the tube and the 

# vac sample is containerized, as the sludge may be more easily

_

examined then.


## 5I 

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6110/04 

## ( 7. The sample tubes will be wrapped with new aluminum foil at the top end. The bottom end will be secured with a plastic end cap that will be taped inplace. 8. The sample tubes will be moved to the sample handling area and frozen. 

## F. Sample Preparation The sample tubes will be frozen overnight as described later in this section. The next day, the frozen cores will be extruded (pushed) from the tubes. Previous experience with sampling the FEP sludges found that the frozen cores are not hard, but rather slushy. Sample aliquots for VOC analysis will be cut or cored from the frozen cores and placed in the appropriate sample containers. The remaining portions ofthe four frozen cores from each pond section will be combined. The combined samples will be thawed and homogenized before they are placed in the sample shipping containers. Table 4 lists the sample containers, preservation requirements, and holding times for the various analytical parameters. The sample freezing system will consist oftwo (2) 55-gallon open head drums, several pieces of 

## 6" polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe cut in lengths slightly longer than the sample tubes and capped at one end, and 

## dry ice pellets. The PVC pipe sections will be placed into a new 55-gallon drum and the sample tubes will be lowered into the PVC pipes in groups ofthree (3) or fewer. 

## Dry ice pellets will be poured into the spaces between the sample tubes until the PVC pipes are full and the sample tubes are completely covered. A second drum will be inverted and placed overthe bottom drum. Both drums will be wrapped inplastic sheeting and taped to prevent air from coming into contact with the 

## dry ice, which will help insulate the freezing system. The samples will be left in the 

## dry ice overnight to ensure that they will be frozen before being cut into layers. To prevent tampering while the samples are left overnight in the drums, custody tape seals will be placed across the overlapping edges ofeither the drums or the plastic sheeting. The custody
" seals will be initialed and dated by one ofthe sampling team members. The next day, the sample tubes will be removed from the PVC pipes to process the samples for submission to the laboratory. The exterior surface ofthe frozen sample tube will be sprayed with DI water to slightly thaw the sample for removal from the tube. As 

### soon as the sludge is extruded from the sampling tube, the sample aliquot for VOC analysis will be removed from the middle ofthe sludge core and p" laced into 

## the appropriate container. Sample aliquots for VOC analysis will be removed from the frozen sludge by coring, such as with a cork borer orwith an EnCore® sampler. The coring device will be selected to closely match the diameter ofthe VOC vial orjar container, and thus minimize headspace in the container. The frozen sludge will be cored in lengths that are longer than the VOC container(s), and the end will be trimmed as needed to cap the container. The VOC sample container will be

.filled completely to minimize headspace.


## 6I 

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04



## The remainder ofthe four cores from each 1O,OOO-sq-ft section will beplaced in a new aluminumpan, or other suitable, cleaned metal container. The combined sludges will be thawed and then homogenized within the container by stirring with a cleaned utensil. Aliquots ofthe homogenized sludge will beplaced in the appropriate sample bottles. After each sample is bottled, a custody seal will be placed across the sample container lid. The sample containers will beplaced in coolers with ice to maintain a temperature of4 degrees Celsius C<>C). A temperature blank will be included in each cooler for the laboratory to monitor the temperature in the coolerupon receipt. Samples for VOC analysis will be delivered to the laboratory the same day they are removed from the cores. Other samples preferably will be delivered to the laboratory the same day also; but ifthey are held overnight, then the coolers will be kept in a secure, locked location. Custody ofthe samples will be maintained following the chain-of-custody procedures in the BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT), Data Collection Quality Assurance Plan (DCQAP), which is presented in Exhibit 7-F.
. 

## G. Field Documentation The sludge sampling activities will be documented on the following kinds offield forms:
• Field DailyActivity Log • Sample Collection Log • Chain ofCustody Form. Examples ofthese forms, and how they are used, are included in the DCQAP, Appendix F, which is being issued as a separate document: The daily narrative ofthe fieldwork for the sludge sampling will be documented on Field Daily Activity Logs. Each sludge tube or other sample collected will be documented on a Sample Collection Log. The Sample Collection Log will provide the following information about the sample: pond identifier (ID), sample location ID, number oftubes collected at the sampling point, sludge depth and description, collection ofadditional material for quality control (QC) samples, and any comments or observations. All samples sent to the laboratory for analysis will be accompanied by a chain-of-custody form, which will also include the request for analysis. 

## IV. Sample Analysis A. 

## Analytical Laboratories It is anticipated that the entire laboratory analyses, except dioxins/furans and oil and grease, will be performed bythe BWXT Services Nuclear Environmental Laboratory. Dioxins/furans will be

7

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04



# ( analyzed byEno River Labs ofOur ham, North Carolina. Oil and grease will be analyzed by Severn Trent Laboratory-St. Louis, Earth City, Missouri. The current certificates of accreditation for the laboratories are presented in Appendix G as part ofthe OCQAP. Ifanother laboratory is used for some ofthe analyses, that laboratory shall be accredited bythe National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program for the analyses the laboratory will perform. 

## B. Phase 1 Analytical Parameters

< 

### The parameters to be analyzed in the Phase 1 sludge samples are listed in Table 1. The specific analytical methods and the laboratories' standard reporting limits for the various parameter groups are listed in Tables 5 through 10. 

## C. Phase 2 Analytical Parameters After the Phase 1 analysis results are completed and compiled, a summary will be provided to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). To provide a cost-effective and comprehensive sampling analysis for Phase 2, a telephone conference call or meeting will be held with the EPA to determine the final list ofanalytes for the Phase 2 sludge samples. It is anticipated that the Phase 2 samples will be analyzed for a significantly shorter list ofanalytes. 

# v. Quality Control Samples

- Phases 1 and·2 QC samples will be collected and analyzed to verify the integrity ofthe sampling and analytical program. The types ofQC samples that will be collected and their general collection frequencies are described below. 

## A. Trip Blanks Trip blanks are applicable only to samples being analyzed for VOCs. The blanks are prepared in the laboratory using laboratory-grade 

## 01 water. The blanks are transported to the site and back to the laboratory without being opened until the site samples are analyzed. One trip blank will accompany each cooler that contains samples to be analyzed for VOCs. The trip blank will be analyzed for VOCs along with the sludge samples that it accompanied from the field. 

## B. Temperature Blanks A temperature blank consists ofa tap water sample in ajar kept in the cooler along with the site samples. A temperature blank will be placed in each cooler to verify that samples received by the laboratory are at 4°C, plus or minus 2°C. The laboratory will measure the temperature ofthe blank upon receipt ofthe cooler
. Observ.ed blank sample temperatures greater than 6°C will be noted in the laboratory analytical report. For VOC samples received at 6 to lOoC, the data usability will be evaluated and a decision will be made whether to continue with analysis or recollect samples. Resampling will


## 8

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04

occur ifVOC samples show a temperature blank greater than 1

# <rC. The data validation process 

# ( willjudge the usability ofthe corresponding data depending on the observed temperature and the susceptibility ofthe particular analytical parameter to degradation under elevated temperature. 

# c. Equipment RiDsates Equipment rinsate samples will be collected during sampling to verify the effectiveness of sampling equipment cleaning and to monitor for potential to inadvertently transport constituents ofinterest between samples. Equipment rinsates will be collected from the final DI water rinses ofthe polycarbonate sampling tubes orthe sludge homogenization containers (sequential rinsate samples will alternate between the two). One rinsate sample will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, ortwo per sampling event (e.g., sampling phase), whichever is greater. The rinsate samples will be analyzed for total concentrations ofall the chemical parameters. 

## D. Field Blanks Field blanks will be prepared in the field from the source ofthe DI water used for cleaning. Analysis offield blanks will ensure that all water sources used during cleaning ofsampling equipment are free ofthe parameters ofinterest. One field blank will 

## be collected per day and analyzed for total concentrations ofall the chemical parameters. 

## E. Field Duplicates Field duplicate samples ofthe sludges will be collected
. The aliquots offield duplicates for 

# ( VOC analysis will be collected from adjacent positions on the same sludge core. Field duplicate aliquots for the other analytical parameters will be collected from the homogenized sludge. A minimum ofone field duplicate will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling phase, whichever is greater. Field duplicates will be analyzed for the same parameters as the other sludge samples. 

## F. Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Samples Separate field samples will be collected for the laboratory matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate 

## (MSIMSD) analyses. 

## MSIMSD samples are described in the DCQAP. Onepair ofMSIMSD samples will 

## be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event, whichever is greater. 

## VI. Sample Quantities Table 11 lists the estimated numbers ofsludge samples and QC samples and the sample containers**fo~** 

## the Phase 1 sampling. 

## VII. Data Validation The analytical data will be validated by Shaw Environmental, Inc., in accordance with the EPA Region

# m InnovativeApproaches to Data Validation (June 1995). The validation will evaluate
9

## BWXT - FEP Delisting Petition 6/10/04 

## the laboratory analytical reports and the associated field documentation to detennine whether the sampling and analytical method requirements are achieved. The analytical data generated will be analyzed for precision, accuracy, completeness, representativeness, and comparability. The minimum acceptable completeness goal for Phase 1 will be 7 out of8 sample analyses, except for the mUltiple pH extractions, for which 100 percent completeness is required. If necessary, more samples will be taken and analyzed to generate a data set that is acceptably complete. The completeness goal for Phase 2 will
.be at a minimum of90 percent.



## 10

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6110/04 

## LIST OF TABLES 

# ( 1 Analytical Parameters for Phase 1 Sampling and Analysis ofthe FEP Sludges 2 Sludge Sampling Locations

- FEPI 3 

## Sludge Sampling Locations

- FEP2 4 

## Laboratory Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 5 

## Reporting Limits for Metals, Inorganics, and Formaldehyde, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 6 

## Reporting Limits for Miscellaneous Parameters, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 7 Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 8 

## Reporting Limits for Semivolatile Organics, Phase 1

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 9 

## Reporting Limits for Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 10 

## Reporting Limits for Dioxins and Furans, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges 11 

## Numbers ofSludge and Quality Control Samples, Phase 1 

## Analyses ofFEP Sludges

LIST OF EXHIBITS 

## EXHffiIT7-A Isopach Map ofSediment Material in Ponds 1 

## and 2 (Figure 2 from the Report of Findings, Sediment Sampling from the Final Effluent Ponds, 

## by IT Corp., October 1993) 

## EXHffiIT7-B Plan Views and Surface Area Calculations for the FEPs EXHffiIT7-C Sampling Section Layout for FEPI EXHffiIT7-D Sampling Section Layout for FEP2 EXHffiIT7-E Random Number Table

11

### Table 1 Analytical Parameters for Phase 1 Sampling and Analysis of the FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia NO. OF SAMPLES(note 1) IANALYTICAL PARAMETERS 

### I FEP 1 

### I FEP2 TOTAL Total Analyses**~ppendix** IX VOCs (note 2>­**~ppendix** IX SVOCs (note 2) Appendix IX Metals (note 3) Appendix IX PCBs Appendix /IX Dioxins/Furans Oil and Grease (note 4) 4 4 Total Sulfide Total Cyanide (note 5) Formaldehyde Fluoride ITCLP-Extract Analyses**~ppendix** IX VOCs (notes 2 and 6)**~pendix** IX SVOCs (notes 2 and 6)**~ppendix** IX Metals (note 4)**~pendix** IX PCBs**~pendlx** IX Dloxins/Furans 4 4 Cyanide (notes 5 and 7) Formaldehyde Fluoride Multiple pH Leaching (note 8) r Appendix IX VOCs (notes 2 and 6) \.**~~endlx** IX SVOCs {notes 2 and 6) App_endix IX Metals (note 4>­ Appendix IX PCBs Appendix IX Dioxins/Furans 1 1 Cyanide (note 5) Formaldehyde Fluoride Other Analyses Percent water content or percent solids Ifnote 9) Corrosivity 4 

### 4 Ilgnltability App. IX 

### = 40 CFR 264 Appendix IX, Ground-Water Monitoring List FEP 

# = Final Effluent Pond Notes: 8

8

2



### 8

1. All samples from four locations in each pond will be tested for all parameters, except only one sample from each pond will be subjected to multiple pH extractions. 2. Analyses will include the following constituents not included in 40 CFR 261 Appendix VIII: acetone, ethylbenzene, isophorone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, styrene, and xylenes (total). 3. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by Method 7196A. 4. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent, then extractable metals will be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure SW-846 Method 1330) in lieu ofTCLP extraction. 5. If no total cyanide is detected, then 

### it is unnecessary to analyze for TCLP-extractable cyanide. 6. OrganiCS that are not detected in the total analyses do not need to be analyzed in the TCLP extracts. 7. TCLP extraction for cyanide will use deionized water as the leaching fluid. 8. TCLP analyses for all constituents using two extraction fluids other than the standard TCLP extraction fluid: (1) distilled deionized water; and (2) NaOH solution of 10<pH<12. This is described in the EPA RCRA Del/sting Program Guidance Manual for the Petitioner, March 2000, Appendix H, Elements of the Region 6's Evaluation Process, 8Attachment 4, Multiple pH Test Protocol, at 

### www.epa.gov/earth1rt>/6pd/rcra clpd-o/dlistpdthtm. 9. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basis. KN4IBwxnFEP\SAPlExhlblt 7\FEP SAP Table 1 (5-19.04).xlsI6l10/2004110:57 AM_ _ 

### Table 2 Sludge Sampling Locations - FEP1 

# ( LOCATION 

### 10 5ection 

### # / Grid 

### # 1/20 1/22 1/74 1/94 .-,.' 

# ... "'.

### ~¥b~;~J], .,. :"i""<-n. , A '" 

### 2/16 2/44 2/45 2/93

# ~(:lt1~jrj.~~~" 

# .. 

# iiL**-.~ ~c.;.~.**  '. ,.,;':., .•.., ,i,·,/
. .**~,;;** ,_, 

### 3/03 ( 

### 3/04 3/32 3/62

t ';":.­

## .,

. -**,'~<1.** ' ••.... 

### 4/01 4/27 4/61 4/89 Coordinates 512,E112 521,E18 562,E53 579,E53

, '.' 

### 596,E65 5121, E41 5121,E53 5162,E30



# ..**~(.** .; 

## .

_ c 

### 5171, E30 5171, E41 S196,E18 5221, E18

• .t·,.:.,' ,­


# - '-'. 

## .. . 

### S 6, E122 S 32, E167 584, E122 S 110, E182 LOCATION 

### 10 5ection 

### # / Grid 

### # 5/05 5/26 5/74 5/87

,

" 

### 6/05 6/08 6/37 6/95

, 

# '.'
.**_''-~t(t~tl~~F~~ ~**  •. . ... '. 

### 7/40 7/55 7/67 7/85



# - '.
I ,'. 

### Coordinates 56, E227 532, E235 597, E220 5110, E243 

### .,<**L~' ::·~~~~~,.-,.<-~,~~t~:~-t4f** **j**

:. ",">('1"0**'t'J~:~'l:"rt~'''''1··;m;-;.~ ~.**  --:!
....**~ -.,~-=.~.;.,::**  ...-:**~ ',.~**  -1\.-=;



### 5132, E186 5132, E231 5156, E126 5223, E126



## ... cN" , _ -:. ", _."**.I:~-":::C:.,,:** ..... ;'tj,_
.**~!.** " .""" , •. u." <- •.

### ,**;'~'"f~** .. ,",



# .**t~~i:t1i" ~~~~~A}** **~ ~_**  _ _**~** 

### 529, E339 542, E339 555, E327 581, E301



# - '. r •

### .....:~:;,~l,t.I..~;'W"·,···/>'i~!~y'**~**

KN4\BWX1iFEPISAPlExhibit 7\FEP SAP Table2-3 (S-20-04).doc\6/1 012004\11 :02 AM

### Table 3 Sludge Sampling Locations - FEP2 ID LOCATION 10 

### LOCATION 10 

### 5ection 

### # I 

### Coordinates 5ection 

### # I 

### Grid 

### # Coordinates 5ection 

### # I 

### Grid 

### # Coordinates

Grid 

### # 1 101 

### 53, E7 3/07 

### 53,E218 5/02 

### 53, E284 1 116 

### 510, E 73 3 110 

### 53, E 258 5/08 

### 53, E 364 1 129 

### 517,E112 3 114 

### 510, E 178 5/44 

### 531, E 310 1 198 

### 566, E 99 3/35 

### 524, E 192 5 I 86 

### 559, E 337



## .. ,­ 

### 2 I 61 

### 5 114, E 7 4 112 

### 579, E 152 6/23 

### 586, E298 2/71 5121,E7 4 I 27 

### 586,E218 6 I 61 

### 5114, E 271 2/72



# .. 5121, E 20 4 I 35 

### 593, E 192 6/67 

### 5114, E 351 2 I 81 

### 5128, E 7 4/95 

### 5135, E 192 6/89 

### 5128, E 377

KN4\BWXT\FEP\sAP\Exhibit 7\FEP SAP Tablc2-3 (S

-20-04).doc16/I0I2004\11 :02 AM/ .......... 

# -.....
Table 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, and Preservation Requirements Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1 of3

Analyses IlAPpendix IX VOCs**I~pendix** IX SVOCs IlAooendix IX Metals (note 2)

IlAnoendix IX Dioxins/Furans 4 oz glass 

### I 60 grams 

### I SW846-3051A and 7471A 40zglass 20 grams 3545Aor 4 oz glass 60 grams SW846-8280A 4 oz glass 60 grams SW846-90718 8 oz glass 100 grams SW846-90308 SW846-9034 40zglass 30 grams SW846-90108 SW846-9014 40zglass 10 grams 40zglass 10 grams EPA 300.0 sect 11.7 SW8:46-9056 4 ozglass 10 grams 14/40 days 4°C 180 days, 

### I 4°C Hg28d 14/40 days I 4°C 14/40 days 

### I 4°C 28 days 

### I

. 4°C 717 days 

# I 4°C 14 days 

# I 4°C 14 days 

# I 4°C 28 days 

# I 4°C Notes: 1. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basis. 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Note that the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analysis is 28 days. 3. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent, then extractable metals will be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu of TClP extraction. 4. If no total cyanide is detected, then it is unnecessary to analyze for TClP-extractable cyanide. 5. Organics that are not detected in the total analyses do not need to be analyzed in the TClP extracts. 6. TClP extraction for cyanide will use deionized water as the leaching fluid. 7. 1# 12#days means 1#days until TClP extraction, 2# days from TClP extraction until determinative analysis. 8. 1# 12# 13# days means 1#days until TClP extraction, 2# days from TClP extraction until preparative extraction, 3# days from preparative extraction until analysis. 9. TClP analyses for all constituents using 

### two extraction fluids other than the standard TClP extraction fluid: (1) distilled deiOnized water; and (2) NaOH solution of 10<pH<12.

KN4IBWlmFEPlSAPlEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables
.... 11**(S.1~).x1s(Table** 4)1611012004(11:03 AM)

## , --...
Table 4 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers,**an~** 

### Preservation Requirements Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 2 of3 Preparation

Method SW846-1311 SW846-5030B SW846-351OC or 3520C SW846-3015A and 7470A SW846-351OC or 3520C

SW846-9010B 40zglass 40zglass SW846-8280A 4 oz glass SW846-9014 4 oz glass 4 oz glass SW846-9056 40zglass 100 grams 4°C 100 grams .4°C 100 grams 4°C 100 grams 4°C 10 grams 4°C 10 grams 10 grams 4°C 1. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basis. 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Note that the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analYSis is 28 days. 3
. Ifthe content ofoil and grease equals or exceeds one percent. then extractable metals wi" be determined using the Oily Waste Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu of TCLP extraction. 4. If no total cyanide is detected. then it is unnecessary to analyze for TCLP-extractable cyanide. 5. Organics that are not detected in the total analyses do not need to be analyzed in the TCLP extracts. 6 •
. TCLP extraction for cyanide wi" use deionized water as the leaching flUid. 7. 1# 12#days means 1# days until TCLP extraction. 2# days from TCLP extraction until determinative analysiS
. B. 1# 12# 13#days means 1# days until TCLP extraction. 2# days from TCLP extraction until preparative extraction. 3#days from preparative extraction until analysis. 9. TCLP analyses for a" constituents using 

### two extraction fluids other than the standard TCLP extraction fluid: (1) distilled deionized water; and (2) NaOH solution of 10<pH<12.

KN4IBWXT\FEPlSAPlEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11**(5-1~~lds(Table** 4)1811012004(11 :03 AM)

### --... 

## "'
Table 4 Analytical Methods, SamRIe 

### Containers, and Preservation Requirements Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges 

# Bwxi Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 30f3

lMultlDle pH Leaching (note 9) I!ADpendix IX VOCs (note 5) !\Appendix IX SVOCs (note 5)

!\Appendix IX PCBs llAnoendix IX Dioxins/Furans lCyanide (notes 4 and 6)**fm~nt** water content (note 1) PreparaUon Method Multiple pH Test Protocol SW846-5030B SW846-351OC or 3520C SW846-3015A and 7470A SW846-351OG or 3520C

SW846-9010B

NA NA NA SW846-3665A or SW846­ 3665A1363OC

NA NA NA HACH SW846-8270C 8 oz glass 

## I 300 grams 8 oz glass 

### I 300 grams SW846-8082 8 oz glass 

## I 300 grams SW846-8280A 8 oz glass 

### I 300 grams SW846-9014 4 oz glass 

### I 30 grams (MBTH I 4 oz glass 

## I 30 grams

CLPModified NA NA SW846-9045C 2 oz glass 

### I 20 grams SW846-1010 2 oz glass 

## I 30 grams 4°C 4°C 40C 4°C 4°C 4°C

NA NA ASAP 4°C 7 days 40C
1. Analytical results will be reported on a wet weight basis. 2. Ifthe total chromium content exceeds one percent, then analyze for hexavalent chromium by method 7196A. Note that the soil holding time for hexavalent chromium analysis is 28 days
. 3. Ifthe content of oil and grease equals or exceeds one percent. then extractable metals 

### win be determined using the Oily Waste ·Extraction Procedure (SW-846 method 1330) in lieu of TCLP extraction. 4
. If no total cyanide is detected, then it is unnecessary to analyze for TCLP-extractable cyanide. 5. Organics that are not detected in the total analyses do not need to be analyzed in the TCLP extracts. 6. TCLP extraction for cyanide will use deionized water as the leaching fluid
. 7.1# 12#days means 1# days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until determinative analysis. 8. 1# 12# 13#days means 1#days until TCLP extraction, 2# days from TCLP extraction until preparative extraction, 3# days from preparative extraction until analysis
. 9. TCLP analyses for all constituents using 

### two extraction fluids otherthan the standard TCLP extraction fluid : (1) distilled deionized water; and (2) NaOH solution of 10<pH<12.

KN4IBWXT\FEPlSAPlEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables
.... 11**(~l9-04 xIs(Tabie**  4)1611012004(11 :03 AM),

### Table 5 Reporting Limits for Metals, Inorganics, and Formaldehyde Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia
Method: see below Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors.



# ( Metals**Antimon~** Arsenic Barium**8e~lIium** Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Coee!!r lead**Mercu~** Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Tin Vanadium Zinc CAS 

### # 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7439-97-6 7440-02-0 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-28-0 7440-31-5 7440-62-2 7440-66-6 Method 7041 7060A 60108 60108 60108 60108 60108 60108 7421 7470AI 7471A 60108 60108 60108 7841 60108 60108 60108 Water or TCLP Extract Detection Limit Reporting Limit uS/L ug/L 0.0003 0.0003 0.0013 0.0013 0.0011 0.0011 0.00015 0.00015 0.0014 0.0014 0.0029 0.0029 0.0023 0.0023 0.0053 0.0053 0.0005 0.0005 0.00004 0.0001 0.0062 0.0062 0.0252 0.0252 0.0049 0.0049 0.0005 0.0005 0.0173 0.0173 0.0033 0.0033 0.0036 0.0036 Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit uglkg uS/kg 0.06 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.03 0,28 0.28 0.58 0.58 0.46 0.46 1.06 1.06 0.1 0.1 0.007 0.017 1.24 1.24 5.04 5.04 0.98 0.98 0.1 0.1 3.46 3.46 0.66 0.66 0.72 0.72

Miscellaneous Comeounds**C~anide** Fluoride Sulfide**~Acid Soluble~**  Formaldehyde CAS 

### # 57-12-5 9014 16984-48-8 9056 18496-25-8
. 9034 HACH 50-00-0 Formaldehyde (M8TH Methodl Water or TClP Extract Detection Limit Reporting Limit 

### mall maIL 0.004 0.005

0.2 0.25 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit 

### ma/ka ma!ka 0.20 0.25 2.0 2.5 10 20 10.0 10.0

KN41BWXT\FEPlSAPlEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11 (5-19-04).xls(Table 5)\611412004(1:27 PM)

# ( Table 6 Reporting Limits for Miscellaneous Parameters Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia
Method: see below 

### Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia

Parameter 

### Percent water content Corrosivity Ignitability Method 

### CLP Modified 9045C 1010 ' Units 

### Oto 100 

### %



# oto14 pH units 70 to 150 deg F

I

KN4IBWXnFEPISAPIEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11 (5-19-04).xls(Table 6 )\6/14/2004(1:27 PM)

### Table 7 Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics

Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1 of2 Method: SW846-8260B Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not**adjuste~** for % moisture or sample dilution factors. Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit Compound CAS # ug/L ug/L uQlkg uglkg 1,1,1,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 2 10 2 10 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 2 10 2 10 1,1,2.2- TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 2 10 2 10

. 1,1,2- TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 2 10 2 10 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 2 10 2 10 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 2 10 2 10 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 2 10 2 10 1,2.3- TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 2 10 2 10 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 2 10 2 10 1,2.4- TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 2 10 2 10 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 2 10 2 10 1,2-DIBROMQ-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 2 10 2 10 1.2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 2 10 2 10 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 2 10 2 10 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 2 10 2 10 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 2 10 

### 2 10 1,3,5- TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 2 10 2 10 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 2 10 2 10 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 2 10 2 10 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 2 10 2 10 1A-DIOXANE 123-91-1 20 100 20 100 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 2 10 2 10 2-BUTANONE 78-93-3 2 10 2 10 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 110-75-8 2 10 2 10 2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 2 10 2 10 2-HEXANONE 591-78-6 2 10 2 10 4-CHLOROTOLUENE 108-43-4 · 2 10 2 10 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 108-10-1 2 10 2 10 ACETONE 67-64-1 2 10 2 10 ACETONITRILE 75-05-8 20 100 20 100 ACROLEIN 107-02-8 20 100 20 100 ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 20 100 20 100 ALLYL CHLORIDE 107-05-1 2 10 2 10 BENZENE 71-43-2 2 10 2 10 BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 2 10 2 10 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 74-97-5 2 10 2 10 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 2 10 2 10 BROMOFORM 75-25-2 2 10 2 10 BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 2 10 2 10 CARBON DISULFIDE 75-15-0 2 10 

### 2 10 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 2 10 

### 2 10 CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 2 10 2 10 CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 2 10 2 10 CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 2 10 2 10 CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 2 10 2 10 CHLOROPRENE 126-99-8 2 10 2 10 CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 2 10 2 10 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 2 10 2 10 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 124-48-1 2 10 2 10 DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 2 10 2 10 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 2 10 2 10 ETHYL METHACRYLATE 97-63-2 2 10 2 10 ETHYLBENZENE**1~1-4** 2 10 2 10 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 87-68-3 2 10 2 10 IODOMETHANE 74-88-4 2 10 2 10
KN4I8WlmFEP\SAP.eXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11 (6-19-04)
.xls(Tabie**7)16/1~(3:05** PM)

### Table 7 Reporting Limits for Volatile Organics

Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia 

# ( Page 2 of 2 Method : SW846-8260B Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors. Water or TCLP Extract Solid Detection limit Reporting Limit Detection limit Reporting Limit Come2und CAS # ull!L ull!L**u~g** ull!kg ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL 78-83-1 20 100 20 100 ISOPROPYL BENZENE 98-82-8 2 10 2 10 M,P-XYLENES 000-00-0 2 10 2 10 METHACRYLONITRILE 126-98-7 20 100 20 100 METHYL METHACRYLATE 80-62-6 2 10 2 10 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 2 10 2 10 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 2 10 2 10 NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 2 10 2 10 N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 2 10 2 10 N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 2 10 2 10 O-XYLENE 95-47-6 2 10 2 10 P-ISOPROPYL TOLUENE 99-87-6 2 10 2 10 PROPIONITRILE 107-12-0 20 100 20 100**SE~BUTYLBENZENE** 135-98-8 2 10 2 10 STYRENE 100-42-5 2 10 2 10 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 2 10 2 10 TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 2 10 2 10 TOLUENE 108-88-3 2 10 2 10 ( TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 2 10 2 10 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 2 10 2 10 TRANS-1,4-DICHLOR0-2-BUTENE 110-57-6 2 10 2 10 TR
. ICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 2 10 2 10 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 2 10 2 10 VINYL ACETATE 108-05-4 2 10 2 10 VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 2 10 2 10

KN4l8wxnFEPlSAPlEXHIBlT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11 (5-1944).xis[Table 7)\6/1412004(3:05 PM)Table 8 Reporting Limits for Semlvolatlle Organics Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia Page 1 of 2 Method: SW84S-8270C Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors
. Water or TCLP Extract Detection Limit Reporting Umlt C0!!!e2und CAS. uS/L uS/L 1,2,4,5- TETRACHLOROBENZENE 95-94-3 2
.5 10 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 2
.5 10 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 2
.5 10 1,3,5- TRINITROBENZENE 99-35-4 2
.5 10 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 2.5 10 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 2
.5 10 1,4-NAPTHOQUINONE 130-15-4 2
.5 10 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 90-12-0 2.5 10 1-NAPHTHYLAMINE 134-32-7 2
.5 10 2,2'-QXYBIS(1-CHLOROPROPANE) 108-60-1 2
.5 10 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 58-90-2 2.5 10 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 95-95-4 2.5 10 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 88-06-2 2.5 10 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 120-83-2 2.5 10 2,4-DIMETHYPHENOL 105-67-9 2
.5 10 2 ,4-DINITROPHENOL 51 -28-5 2.5 10 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 121-14-2 2
.5 10 2,6-DICHLOROPHENOL 87-65-0 2
.5 10 2 ,6-DINITROTOLUENE 606-20-2 2.5 10 2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE 53-96-3 2.5 10 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 91-58-7 2
.5 10 2-CHLOROPHENOL 95-57-8 2
.5 10 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 91-57-6 2
.5 10 2-METHYLPHENOL 95-48-7 2
.5 10 2-NAPHTHYLAMINE 91-59-8 2.5 10 2-NITROANILINE 86-74-4 2.5 10 2-NITROPHENOL 86-75-5 2.5 10 2-PICOLINE 109-06-08 2
.5 10 2-5EC-BUTYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 86-85-7 2
.5 10 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 91-94-1 2.5 10 3,3'-QIMETHYLBENZIDINE 119-93-7 2.5 10**3~ETHYLCHOLANTHRENE** 56-49-5 2
.5 10 3-METHYLPHENOL 108-39-4 2
.5 10 3-NITROANILINE 99-09-2 2.5 10 4,6-DINITR0-2-METHYLPHENOL 534-52-1 2.5 10 4-AMINOBIPHENYL 92-67-1 2
.5 10 4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER 101-55-3 2
.5 10**4-CHLORO~ETHYLPHENOL** 59-50-7 2
.5 10 4-CHLOROANILINE 106-47-8 2
.5 10 4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER 7005-72-3 2
.5 10 4-METHYLPHENOL 106-44-5 2
.5 10 4-NITROANILINE 100-01-6 2
.5 10 4-NITROPHENOL 100-02-7 2.5 10 4-NITROQUINOLINE-N-QXIDE 56-57-5 2.5 10 5-NITRO-O-TOLUIDINE 99-55-8 2
.5 10 7,12-DIMETHYLBENZ(A)ANTHRACENE 57-97-6 2.5 10 ACENAPHTHENE 83-32-9 2
.5 10 ACENAPHTHYLENE 208-96-8 2
.5 10 ACETOPHENONE 98-86-2 2.5 10 alpha, alpha-DIMETHYLPHYENETHYLAMINE 122-09-8 no standard available ANILINE 62-53-3 2.5 10 ANTHRACENE 120-12-7 2.5 10 AZOBENZENE 103-33-3 2.5 10 BENZIDINE 92-87-5 2
.5 10 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 56-55-3 2
.5 10 BENZO(A)PYRENE 50-32-8 2
.5 10 BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 205-99-2 2
.5 10 BENZO(G,H,I)PERYLENE 191-24-2 2
.5 10 BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 207-08-9 2
.5 10 BENZOIC ACID 65-85-0 2
.5 10 BENZYL ALCOHOL 100-51-6 2
.5 10 BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE 111-91-1 2.5 10 BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER 111-44-4 2
.5 10 Solid Detection Umlt Reporting Umlt uSlkS us!!gj

100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 

### 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330

no standard available 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330 100 330
I<N'IBWXTIFEPISAPIEXHIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11**(S.I~) xIs(T_**  8)\811412004(3:06 PM)Table 8 Reporting Limits for Semlvolatlle Organics Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia 

# ( Page 2 of2 Method: SWB46-827OC Laboratory: BWXT Services NEL Lynchburg. Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors
. Water orTCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting LImit**Com~und** CAS # us!L uS/L uSIkS uli!II BIS(2-ETHYlHEXYL)PHTHALA TE 117-81-7 2
.5 10 100 330 BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE 85-68-7 2.5 10 100 330 CARBAZOLE 86-74-8
... 2.5 10 100 330 CHLOROBENZILATE 510-15-6 2.5 10 100 330 CHRYSENE 218-01-9 2
.5 10 100 330 DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE 53-70-3 2.5 10 100 330 DIBENZOFURAN 132-64-9 2.5 10 100 330 DIETHYLPHTHALATE 84-66-2 2.5 10 100 330 DIMETHYLPHTHALATE 131-11-3 2.5 10 100 330 DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE 84-74-2 2
.5 10 100 330 DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE 117-84-0 2.5 10 100 330 DIPHENYLAMINE 122-39-4 2.5 10 100 330 ETHYL METHANESULFONATE 62-50-0 2.5 10 100 330 FLUORANTHENE 206-44-0 2
.5 10 100 330 FLUORENE 86-73-7 2
.5 10 100 330 HEXACHLOROBENZENE 118-74-1 2.5 10 100 330 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 87-68-3 2.5 10 100 330 HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE 77-47-4 2.5 10 100 330 HEXACHLOROETHANE 67-72-1 2.5 10 100 330 HEXACHLOROPHENE 70-30-4 unstable - inconsistent response unstable - inconsistent response HEXACHLOROPROPENE 1888-71-7 2.5 10 100 330 INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE 193-39-5 2.5 10 100 330 ISOPHORONE 78-59-1 · 2.5 10 100 330 ISOSAFROLE 120-58-1 2
.5 10 100 330 M-DINITROBENZENE 99-65-0 2.5 10 100 330 METHAPYRILENE 91-80-5 2.5 10 100 330 METHYL METHANESULFONATE 66-27-3 2.5 10 100 330 NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 2.5 10 100 330 NITROBENZENE 98-95-3 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE 55-18-5 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE 62-75-9 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSODI-N-BUTYLAMINE 924-16-3 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSODINPROPYLAMINE 621-64-7 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSOMETHYLETHYLAMINE 10595-95-6 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSOMORPHOLINE 59-89-2 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSOPIPERIDINE 100-75-4 2.5 10 100 330 N-NITROSOPYRROLDINE 930-55-2 2.5 10 100 330 0-TOLUIDINE 95-53-4 2.5 10 100 330 P-DIMETHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE 60-11-7 2.5 10 100 330 PENTACHLOROBENZENE 608-93-5 2.5 10 100 330 PENTACHLOROETHANE 76..Q1-7 2.5 10 100 330 PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE 82-68-8 2
.5 10 100 330 PENTACHLOROPHENOL 87-86-5 2.5 10 100 330 PHENACETIN 62-44-2 2.5 10 100 330 PHENANTHRENE 85-01-8 2.5 10 100 330 PHENOL 108-95-2 2.5 10 100 330 P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE 106-50-3 2
.5 10 100 330 PRONAMIDE 23950-58-5 2.5 10 100 330 PYRENE 129-00-0 2.5 10 100 330 PYRIDINE 110-86-1 2.5 10 100 330 SAFROLE 94-59-7 2.5 10 100 330

KN4I8WXNEPlSAPlEXHIBrr 7IFEP SAP Tables 4-11 (5-1&-04).xIsCT_ 8)1811412004(3:0& PM)

### Table 9 Reporting Limits for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges 

# ( BWXT Mt. Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Method: SW846-8082 Laboratory: BWXT Services NEl lynchburg, Virginia Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % moisture or sample dilution factors. Water or TClP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting limit Compound CAS # ugJl ug/l ug/kg ug/kg AROCLOR-1016 12674-11-2 0
.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1016 12674-11-2 0
.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1221 11104-28-2 0
.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1232 11141-16-5 0.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1242 53469-21-9 0.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1248 12672-29-6 0.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1254 11097-69-1 0.5 20 33 AROCLOR-1260 11096-82-5 0
.5 20 33

KN4\BWXTIFEPISAPIEIBIT 7IFEP SAP Tables "-11**(~ll1004)Jds(T abie**  9)\811<412004(1:27 PM)

## Table 10 Reporting Limits for Dioxins and Furans Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt. Athas Site, Lynchburg, Virginia
Method: SW846-8080A Laboratory: Eno River Labs, LLC Durham, North Carolina Note: Detection and reporting limits are not adjusted for % 

### moisture or sample dilution factors. Water orTCLP Extract Solid Detection Limit Reporting Limit Detection Limit Reporting Limit Compound CAS 

### # nglL nglL ng/kg ng/kg 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1746-01-6 

### 0.4 10.0 0.09 1.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 40321-76-4 2.2 25.0 0.45 2.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 39227-28-6 

## 2 25.0 0.46 2.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 57653-85-7 1.3 25.0 0.55 2.5 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 19408-74-3 0.72 25.0 0.33 2.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 35822-39-4 0.9 25.0 0.28 2.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 3268-87-9 1.7 50.0 0.57 5.0 2,3,7,8-TCDF 51207-31-9 

### 0.54 10,0 0.1 · 1 

### 1.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 57117-41-6 1.9 25.0 0.35 2.5 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 57117-31-4 2.1 25.0 0.42 2.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 70648-26-9 

### 1.4 25.0 0:21 2.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 57117-44-9 

## 2 25.0 0.21 2.5 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 60851-34-5 2.8 25.0 0.34 2.5 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 72918-21-9 2.4 25.0 0.31 2.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
. 67562-39-4 0.75 25.0 0.32 2.5 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 55673-89-7 

## 2.2 25.0 0.29 2.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF 39001-02-0 

## 2.2 50.0 0.65 5.0

KN4\BWXl\FEP\sAP\EXHIBIT 7\FEP SAP Tables 4-11 (5-19-04}.xls(Table 10}\6/14/2004(1 :27 PM)

## " 

# ""
Table 11 Numbers of Sludge and Quality Control Samples Phase 1 Analyses of FEP Sludges BWXT Mt Athos Site, Lynchburg, Virginia

Notes: (1) Four sludge samples from each pond will 

### tie analyzed for al parameters, except only one sample from each pond will be subjected to multiple pH extractions. (2) One field duplicate for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event, whichever Is more frequent. (3) One pair of MSIMSD samples will be collected for every 20 sludge samples, or one per sampling event. whichever is more frequent. (4) One equipment rinsate per 20 sludge samples or 2 per sampling event, whichever is more frequent. (5) One trip blank for each cooler containing samples for VOC analysis. Assumes one cooler per day for four days. (6) One field blank per day. Assumes sampling will take 4 clays. (7) In addition to these sample numbers, all coolers win also contain a temperature blank. (8) A separate container is not required for the moisture content sample. MS - Matrix spike. MSD - Matrix spike duplicate.

KN4IBWlCNEPlSAPlEXHIBlT 7IFEP SAP robles 4-11**(5-t~)Jds(T_II)\IIIt4l2OO4(t 27**  PM)

## , '

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/4/04 

## EXHIBIT7-A ISOPACH MAP OF SEDIMENT**~TERIAL** 

## IN PONDS 1 AND 2 (FIGURE 2 FROM THE REPORTOFFINDINGS, SEDIMENTSAMPLINGFROM THE FINAL EFFLUENTPONDS, BY IT CORP., OCTOBER 1993)

/

# - - 

# - 

# --- · 

## ...



# -

# -­
...... 

# "'"

....... 

# -

# ""'" ,**,,~** 

# - '\\\ 

# '"'1/1 1
,J /./1/

// II ./ 

# / 5)./ / 

## ""/


# ......

. ON) . .. .

....


### '.:.:.:.:. x ' 

### .. ' 

### ..**~**

### ..**~.:.:**


### ..... ' 

### .. ' 

### ..

.... ' 

### .. .:.::. :. x 

## .: ..:.:.

. ', \ , '
.



### . '. 

# EQUALIZING
' 

### . . ' 

### .. 

# POND 

# 112 (1.800,000 GALLON) 

# N**LEGE~D;**

-X(s
.o) MEASUREMENT LOCAnON AND READING (FEET) 

## --"'4--- SEDIMENT ISOPACHrJFEW DASHED WHERE IN RRE EOW EDGE OF WATER 

### -x- FENCE


# NOTES;

,. GRAVEL ACROSS DRIVE AT APPROXIMATE ELEVATION 485.0 2. SURFACE OF WATER IN POND " AND 

# 12 AT APPROXIMATE ELEVAnON 482.5.



# SCALE: 

# o 60 120 FEET 

# FIGURE 2 ISOPACH MAP OF SEDIMENT MATERIAJ- IN PONDS 1 

# AND 

# 2

BWX Technologies, Inc. Nuclear Products Division Lynchburg, Virginia INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 

# [I] CORPORATION

## I P') 0 I !D I 

# ... ... 01) I/) 

# ... ... 0> en**~ ~**  

### d d z z -:l 0

### ~ It: C Q,

## ~ It:**~** :l**~** :::I CJ Ii

.C; Ii (,') :::E

# ~ ..: -:l 

### E 0 It:**~** Q, III**~**

## ~ It: ..: ii: 

## i3 Ii 

### c; ;>.: ;>.: en ID

## ~ is 0**~** 

## is 

## t <

### ~ 0: Z C W P')**~** P') 

### .::::. 

## §**~** ID 

## ;;; w -i 0: ;>.: III

# ~ i j!:! < < 0: C 0 P')**~** 

# .., S" It:**~**

## ~ -i ;>.: III 

## i < 0: 0

# ~ 

# .. ... < 

## e Q. 

### ,.... 0**~** 

# ..,**~** P') 

### .::::. 0> 0 

# ..,**~** I/) 

# ... )( 

## . :.:

. :.:.
..... .

... .



## :... . .. . 

## '::':',': '.:.:

.:.:

' 

### . . 

## .....
..... )( 

## '
.:.:.:.: ' 

### . . ' 

### . . . '. 

### . '
. 

## :....

# :.
. ... 

## ... .

.. -x .: .:: .:.



### ....



## .... .
.. .

..
..... . ' 

## ..

.. .. 

## ...... )(

X(2.75) - X(2
.7S) 

# -X{3
.S) (4.0)

# ~--- X{3
.S)
. X{3.7S) X(2.S) INFlUEI PIPE, XQ.S) ,"--X(S
.7S)**~**

# '(/1~/",<55) ('.0) X(2.oj'" 

# 3.. 

# (y '(5.5)



# .'T t· O ) X(5
.5) X{1.0} X(4.S) X(S.S)

# (,~)**'(~O)I** ___

## ...-,n:m'­
X{1.0) 

# J X(1.5) X(
.S)



# EQUAUZING 

# POND '1 (1,200,000

• I

(II SOURCE: J.E. SIRRINE COMPANY, 9/10/71 DRAWING NO. lP-2704E REV. 9**~**

## • • 

# L


# r )

1

### 6/4/04 

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition EXHIBIT7-B PLAN VIEWS AND SURFACE AREA CALCULATIONS FORTHE FEPS

"

### ,. '­



# ,I

- z. : ";nrr..

## /l.z­ ,+-**~'17",,'b** LEGEND;

;**5'~ 7T",~**  £0111 met OF WA1tII

- x- FDICE

## =~~::J/~:~::;

NQIESi.. t. ORAva ACROSS CAM: IJ .ll'PROXllWt EllVAlION 48S
.0 2.

### l¥~~J{I4A~~:I:IIM~s~D'2

SCALE: i 

# aU 60**ii <** **F.~ .**  .'" • I

# ';**M~~td ?U~**  

# 1**~ ~~.**  

## R:?'s 

# v; e-w PLAN**~OURCE :** **~VElff**



### . :.:.:.

:: :::::::**lo~'** 

### (P 

# J "7' ® I 2.9 @


### , /41 

## --<::::

. .... ":'.:.:' 

### ....**I ~.**  '_','



### frn:' I .,-;,.._ A-,.....,q (J)= IIg " lSO ..2':51)D SF (J!) ,**(.~** .. /'17 ,;<oA "t( 

### ©,. 

### y .. (IQ7 " 4-7) • '_6D**~** 2 Y >- (9Z

- 

### 1011)

-**"=~ ~4-"'"** 

J
.E, SIRRINE CO,Af'oWo'. 9/10/71 ORAWIIIG NO
. LP - 2704£ REV
. 9**::: ~-;**  

# ..**~**

# •• 

# )

-)

### 6/4/04

I ( 

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition EXHIBIT 7-C
. SAMPLING SECTION LAYOUT FOR FEPI

# .;)y»<
.**·)~::::~Hf~(;>** 

# ....

.**~iLLL_·** 

# _ ._

. __ '"
.: .--'---

_..._-- -----­ (

, 

# -

-1'**~, ~'**  C!)' I 

### I 

## I 

## I 1 

## I 

## I

# t-----------~.**~** I,**~** 

## "**I~** 

## I 1 

# I I 

## I I I



# - t 

## I i)-I



# G

.. 0- ...0: .... : .... : .... :.... ." .. . .. .. ..**~.:-.....'** -=-..'.....:....:... ••......:..-.••• :...:.... '.:.. • ..:...:.,;

•••

### ~.~ •• •• ••

### ~.:**:~.: .~'**  ••

### ~. • •• •••••• , , 

## . " 

## ..... . ' 

### . 

# ­ . ... ....

.. .·0 ..

.. .. 0.



# - ' " .. " 

# . '".oo ..

" .. " .. , '

, ' " .. " ..

...

# -:
..

, ' " .. " ..



# . . . 

# . '

.. - ..... ..

.. .. .. .."

.: 

### ..**.~** 

### .. - - _ .. - - .._­**~&**



# ."



# (

JNFLU PIPE ... 

## :

## -:- . 

# I .

0



# FFP / S "'1
...../ P

### t. I NG 

# St: "n ed



## t
..

1 i 

### '("n PUlo d 

# \/;("14**· '~** **·- ·** **--- ----**  _ _ _ __o

___ _

- · - ----- --

______ 0

__ _ ___ _ _ __ _

### . GKA"I 

# . . (



# x



# ( -x

­

# . . . . 

# . . . 

# . 1 

# .**~f'.** n: 

### 1-
.. .,.., 

# · 0,0

### ~\ 'I--. 

# ·**~-** I /1 <J? /0 S.,.". 

### 75 D



### .. II 10; 

# - 

# · 

# · II 

### !**~1** ";>.;l ... S- 3D



### , 3/ '5S- , '/-0



## - f·-- 

# ·**S?'~I** 

### 'l'-S"'r, , 

### , 5"b 

### , , 

# · s, 

# . I

# S~! '0 

# · I 6/ t.£ 

### 70 

# · j i1 '71 i 7+ 

# . 3"0**~** .75' 

## - 

# · I 

# · 

# "I I 1s '10 

### 12.' I 

# · , 

### 91 cr+**"1~** 

## ! luo i S-
o 1(, 

# · ,;l7 ! 

# ·**3~** ; D

### 4r:-~ 

### :\ 

# · +tQ::?'j., ( 

### \:: 

### V ! 

# · v 

### , 

# I , 

## 7 ,-- 

# -- - 

# -- " ! 

# : 7'i

- ; 

# · 8"



### - ...

### -. --" I :**~5** 

# I 

# · ! 

# I**~** 

## i III 4-
.. 

# ! 

# · I 

### . j f't 

# ! ; I 

### i I/Z


# - \...: 

### V II 

### i 

# ! ! ;;' 1 

## , 

# ! i 

# r:**~** 

# mLUEjNT , 

# i 

# P1P[E r,fKz. 

# 1 

# !

---

- 

# l 3/2- i , _.- 

### ----- 

# +._----- 1

- _ . ... ,.. -·.. 1-----·· -.-.. 

### -- -- 

## , ! 

## I i : ._. 

## 1 ---·- 7 0 

### : I j _. 

### -- . 

### ,-_. - -•..



### _ - -.-- 

## ._..

### _. -_.:_.

### __ . i j 

# I j i i 

### j i ; I I 

## , 

# . 

# . . . 

# . 

# . . . . 

# . . . . 

# . 

# . 

# . . . . x 

# /

### ~)

)



# . )

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition 6/4/04
. 

## EXHIBIT7-D SAMPLING SECTION LAYOUT FOR FEP2, . ; .
. '.'

.)



# .. . . . .

. ' 

## . 

# ,..

# ---:=====~~:~ y.-----­

# . ,**,~** . • ; ' , r "

: : 

### . 

# II":.-

.

# ­ x: " " " 

# :**:;: :** **~< ,**  • . 1 , t • "

. ,'
. 

### '.' ,



# . " 

# :'t:,:



# · " " 

# ·
" 

# · · ·

·



# -**. ~**  

## -4 II
ff-ot-
,iii



# ...**~**

# ~

...... 

## _'!



# -

"



# .**~** 

# · 

# · • 

# · · " ..... 

### '"**~** ;j



### ,**I~**

"- 

## 1'.\**~** 

# 1 I 

# '- '"**~** 

# "**~-**

# "\J~~I~] 

# 1 - -**~ ~** **~** 0: :i ' p!**~**



# 1**~ ~** 



# (

# ~ 1-**~.** 

# • ..s

, .

Of 'm [ 'Ii :0 

# ,.. ... e=- 0- 

### ......s 2- 

# .: Ci 

### • P.**~** 

## ., 

## 1 

# .. ....**.~ I~** 


# r:. rl '-v



# .

OJ 

### -,;;**~** 

### a-'" ", ; ;lO i=- 

# "**~** 

### '-S**~ ~**  {**~** .oS -:;i**~ ~**  .!
I



# - ; 

# I. )I

'- 

# C )**~**

.

# ~**~** II

.......**.~** 

# •

- 

# - ;:f

..**~** 

### .:tI\)'..tii**. ~**  i"**~ ~** **~ ~**  t 111 0**~** 

## '" '"

l

## Ir.;~ 

# "**~** 

# rx In



# .....

• •

# ~**.~** 

# -

# "i~ )'-.. 

# - "-**~** ;:;

# :~ ;:.. II 

# 10. 

# .

51

0 V'

J); 

# • ..

. 

# •**~ ~** 

" 

# ·

..**'**



### , 

# · ·
oF 

# · \**~.** 

# \ 

# . " " 

# . I ' ,1. j

I J '. 

## · . : '

.' :

. ,"'**~ ~,**  

### .


# .. }..•::..< ­

x

'

# ..

• 

# x"

•



# · , ' 

# · I

### ',"**~** •

" 

### ..**~** 

# • _.:-!

• .! ,'



# . " : 

# x 

# · ,,

# . '



# .' ,', : I \

' 

# · ..

.**~** :. !



# . 

# · ' "



# . " : 

# . ,

. ' ' 

# · ·



# ..

.:,



# . " '. ,'
. 

# x,:"::" "

. . 

# . . . " 

# · ,

## ( I , ,:. I I • • " 0

!
. ; I. 

# .**.~** ,

. t , ' . ' '.. 

## - n­ 'I-----! e ,; . t ! •

### '~



# . .. 

# '> .- :**t---=t--I--t- -I--h-** **I--1 -~-I----l~..:..-I--I---** **-I --I-"I--liIii** **trl---l--I-t~r--f** " 

## , - 

# .

, ,0

. . W·



# .' ,.



# "" II 

## . ' ,. : . ' .' J
.. -, 

# . 

# .**~** 

### .**~** 

# .

• a**-!**



# ., 

## ..... 1'·**~** .. '



# .

# ' ­

. '

'­ 

# ....

# ---

# ..

, 

# .

f •( 

### Ff;P-.z.. S e:C-T'7o '" /



## pel' 

## z.. S:n:::TlC'",;<



## F1:t'.:z... Se-z:n.,; ;, 

## FE'f 

# r**~o;J4- ~".2.** **~no"'<6" ~~** **~no"/<O** ,­ ( 5704 81 71 1746 53 %9 7346 +2 73 77 63 6% 58 60 S9 89 sa 77 %3 6108 6390 80 38 +2 71 8570 0481 05 

## so 09 3S-' oa 54 51 96 9% 75 5839 :14 a3 

### :S 19 8997 91 %9 16 34'
. 49 

### aa S: 96 8934 17 II 

### 06 91 %4 3

### 8 5506 8359 80 54 7099 %4 64 II 38 

### 8] 65 :7 a3 4C 37 8458 +85j 41 

### Sa 7937 00**~S** 98 54 5389 %634 +01 3 60 38 0886 66 18 76 Sa U 18 6190 90 6] 7 8 S7 3: 06 3995 7594
. 4:1 34 00 49 9753 33 16 %69 1 575 8 +a 48 5 105 48 %7 90 84 a: 1
. 6 %696 

### S4II 01 g6 ' ,5881 3797 80 98 7% 8 I 3343 013: 58 39 1954 56 57 2358 %4 87 77 36 ' 30 97

. 1789 87 04 %8 J3 I34S S9 0] 9 10

### 8 69%4 84++ 4% 8J

36 87 98 73 77 64 75 19 0561 II 64 3 1 75 493 8 9660 15 58 1968
. 9547 %S 69 U90 a6I9 074C 8J 59 90 95 +55 3 %7 J5 8681 16 %9 3760 3935 05 %4 4900 a907 7% 7% 81 84 36 58 

## os 10 70 50 3 1 04 1: 67 74 01 7% 90 0668 5% 50 3955 . 9% :8 %889 64 87 8000 8453 9797 9573 .·809% %649 HSo 4 1 %1 066: 739 1 JS 05 %1 J7 96 %3 . 1646 15 5 I 60 J I 55 %7 84 14 71 58 9471 48 35 H9 6 J% 68 48 %% 40 17 43 %5 33 3 1 %6 a6 59 H 99 00 07 19 9446 17 51 oJ 73
. 99 89 ' a8 ++ 1687 56 16 56 09 3708 0846 56 76 %948 3J 

### 87 70 79 oJ 80 9681 79 68 1801 67 19 %949 5867 '08 56 :7**~** %070 46 31 04 J% 08 79 1878 00 J% 8674 7855 5573 S854 7607 5J 7J %6 J9 745 8 5955 87 II 74 06 4946 3194 8666 6697 664% 90 7+ 13 71 0071**~4I** 67 6: 38 9a 39 %6 30 %9 5% 14 490% 19 3 I %8 IS 5 I 01 1909 9794 5% 43 %% %1 1766 8956 3 1 41 37 87 a8 16 6% 48 01 84 4606 04 J9 9410 76 %1 6594 oS 93 0668 34 7% 7J 17 6534 00 65 757 8 %397 13 04 IJ 08 1575 0% 83 48 %6 5377 6% 96 56 5% :8 a6 U IS 7553 03 18 3357 16 7 I 60 %7 15 18 39 J% 37 0 1 05 86 %5 14 3541 100+ 00 95 85 04 3% 80 19 01 85 

### OJ 39 %9 80 04 %1 5% 1476 %394 97 %8 60 43 4% %S %648 48 13
. 3+ 68 39 l.% 74 85 03 25 35 63 4% 90 90 74 33 17 58 77 833 6 76 %: 00 89 61 55 IJ 17 4% 86 03 J6 45 33 60 77 7% 9% 1076 %% 55 II 00 37 60 o1-77J 67 %6 9% 87 0996 85 J7 8% 61 39 01 70 oS n66 1739 99 H 9 1 93 885 6 35 ;6 97 35 1937 14 66 0757 %4 41 0690 07 ";'% 37 14 7J 35 3% 01 0794 ;8 %8 90 33 7lS6 6377 89 ::l4 %4 %il 0746 50 58 08 73 4% 97 %04% 64 68 48 35 043 8 %8 %8 3694 9% 18 OQ 46 9499 17 

### ·u %860 

### 67 94 %654 6370 8473 ;661 00 49 9 8 43 39 67 68 40 .41 3 1 '9% %8 4957 15 55 I I 8 I 41 89 08 59 4 1 41 J3 59 43 :8 14 S t 0% 71 %.4 45 41 57 %% II 7979 6705 1954 3 a 33 34 68 a793 39 J5 6% 51 35 55 40 99 461 9 %499 4 8 06 9641 %1 25 :9 oJ 577 1 96 49 9474 9890 al 5:Z
. 65 86 %7 46 70 93 %7 39 6437 01 6] %103 4378 1874 77 07 52 70 03 20 8496 14 37 51 oS 6399 810% 845 6

- 17 i8 48 45 32 88 %993 53 21 i I OS 68 S8 79 08 86 37 9876 70 45 66 23 54 16 3940 98 S7 oa 05 6S IS 73 %3 5 I SI 75 06 38 I] 51 68 95 %% 18 59 54 57 44 %:z ;% 35 81 %4 1+ 

### 94 %.4 04 +% %6 9% 14 93 10 %794 90 45 J93J 5026 8846 90 57 40 47 7 163 62 S9 19 :0 85 %0 15 67 78 OJ J2 23 So 59 %.4 83 6499 1800 78 So Each digit is In indef'cndent sample from I populztlon in which the diliu 0 to 9 are equally likelT 

# '"

. iI each has a probability of 

# -to. . Reprinted from c..bridge**El~t.ry 5tltisti~L**  hbLes, o.y. Lindley and J.e.p. Mil Ler, 195Z.

# ~~Lf

# · 

# .

. ,

## 6/4/04 

## BWXT

- FEP Delisting Petition EXHIBIT7-E 

# ( RANDOM NUMBER TABLE

# (' 570<4 8171 1746 53 %9 73
...6 42 73 77 63 6% 58 60 59**~** I 

### Fi;P-z. 

### ' 19 52 77 %3 6108 6390 

### 80 38 42 71 8570 048J 055 0 09 35
. - 02 54 51 96 9275 58 29 2.4 2] %5 19 

## 19 97 9 1 %9 

### Se-c..rrD,.j/ 16 34' . 4922 5% 96 8934 17 II 06 91**~38** 5506 8359 

### 80 54 70 99 24 64 II 38 8365 %7 %3 4C 37 

## 84 58 5j 

### Fe!- 

## z.. 41 82 98 54 5289 26 34 401 3 60 38 0886 66 18 76 82 U 18 61 90 90 63 78 57 3206 3995 7594
. 79 J7 00**~S** 

### S!rcno..t".< 42 J4 00 49 9753 33 16 269 1 575 8 4-Z 48 5 105 48 27 90 8
... 22 16 26 96 54U 0106 ' 5 88 1 3797 80 98 7281 3343 01 J2 58 J9 1954 56 57 2358**~87** " ' 36 ' %097 

### Fe-t'.-'­ 17 89 87 04 28 3% IJ 45 59 03 9108 692.4- 8444 428 3 

### S-e-z:n.,.t ;, 3687 98 7J 77 64 75 19 05 6 1 It 64 3 1 75 493 8 96 60 15 58 1968
. 9547 25 69 119O 2619 0740 8359 90 95 455 2 %735 86 SI 1629 37 60 3935 0524 4900 2907 

## Fe-?' ,:z.. 72 i2 8184 36 58 05 10 70 50 31 0<4 1267 7
... CII 7 2 90



## .. "'4­ 0668 5 2 50 3955 92 28 :8 89 64 87 8000 8453 9797 9573 .· So 9% 26 49 54 50 4121 0662 739 1 35 05 21 37 9623 . 16 .6 r 5 S I 60 3 1 55 %7 

# s... 14 7 1 58 94 71 48 35 H96 3268 482% 401 7 43 %5 3331 2626 59 J4 9900 :fi'f=C 77 o,.{ 

### £**~,z.** 07 19 94 46 17 51 0373
. 99 89 :844 1687 56 16 5609 37 08 08 46 56 76 2948 3387 70 79 03 80 9681 79 68**~~** 1801 67 19 2949 5 867 '08 56 2724 2070 +63 1 0432 >er:.71o'/(0 08 79 1878 00 32 86 74 7 8 55 5572 58 54 7607 53 i3 %639 7458 5955 

## 87(1 7406 4946 3 1 94 8666 6697 6642 90 74 13 il 0071 Z-441 6762 3

### 8 92 39 %6 3029 5% 14 49 02 19 31 28 IS 51 01 1909 97 94 52 43 22 %1 1766 

### ( 8956 3 I 41 37 87 28 16 6248 0184 460' 6 0+ 39 9410 76 21 6594 oS 93 0668 34 ;2 73 17 6534 00 65 7578 2397 1304 13 08 IS 75 028 3 48 %6 5377 6a 96 56 52 2826 12 15 75 53 03 18 33 57 16 71 60 %7 IS 18 3932 3701 oS 86 25 14 35 41 1004 00 95 85 04 3280 1901 85 03 2929 8004 21 5% 1476 2394
. 97 %8 60 43 42 %5 %648 48 13**6~ .**  39 %% 7" 85 03 2S 35 63 4% 90 9074 33 17 5 8 77 833 6 

### 76 %Z 00 89 61 55 13 17 4286 0336 45 J3 &077 ;% 92 1076 :1:l55 II 00 37 60 .7 iJ 6726 9% 87 0996 85 37 Sa 61 39 01 70 oS 1% 66 1739 99**J~** 91 93 8856 3576 9735 1937 14 66 0757 %44 1 06 90 0i 7l J7 14 iJ 3S 3 20 1 0794 i828 90 33 71 56 63 i7 8924 24 lil 07. 6 50 58 08 73 42 97 2042 64 68 48 35 043 8 28 %8 36 94 92 18 0946 9499 17 41 2860 

### 67 94 %654 6370 8·Q3 i 6 61 00 49 9 8 43 39 67 6840 4 1 3 I " 9% %8 4957 IS 55 I I 8 I .p 89 08 59 41 41 33 59 43 28 14 5 I 0% 71 Z-445 41 57 2% II 7979 67 05 1954 32 33 3468 %793 393S 6% SI 35 55 40 99 4619 2499 4806 96 41 %1 %5 29 03 5771 96 49 9474 9890 2 1 52 65 86 2746 ';'093 27 39 64 J7 0163 %103 4378 18 i4 77 07 5270 03 20 8496 14 37 51 05 6J 99 81 02 845 6 1778 48 45 J2 88 :993 53 1 I ';'1 OS 68 58 79 08 8631 9876 7 0 45 6623 54 16 3940 98 57 02 OS 6S 15 73 23 51 51 7S 06 38 13 51 68 95 22 IS 59 54 57 44 22 'i2 J5 81 24 1494 2.4- 04 4% 26 92 14 93 10 2794 90 45 39 J3 50 26 8846 90 57 40 47 71 63 6: 59 1920 85.0 IS 07 78 OJ 32 23 So 59 Z-4 83 6499 1800 78 SO



# ... E2ch dig1f is an independent sample from I popuiatlon In which the dialu 0 to 9 are equally likelT ia ncb has a probability of 

## 10
.**Rep~ ;** **nted f~om**  c..tridge**El~t.ry** statistical Tables, O
. V. L indley and J.e.p. Mi**lle~,** 19S2. 

# \="Lf