alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_206439.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 


October 6, 2020


 


 


Sharon Price John


 


 


Re:     Consent to Reduced 2020 Target Bonus Opportunity


 


Reference is made to that certain Employment, Confidentiality and Noncompete Agreement that you entered into with Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of March 7, 2016, as amended (the “Agreement”). Section 3(b) of the Agreement provides in part:


 


Should Company meet or exceed the sales, profits and other objectives established by the Compensation Committee for any fiscal year, Employee shall be eligible to receive a bonus for such fiscal year in the amount as determined by the Compensation Committee; provided however, the target bonus opportunity established for Employee in any given fiscal year will be set by the Compensation Committee at not less than one hundred percent (100%) of Employee’s earned annual base pay for such fiscal year.


 


In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has requested that you agree to a reduced target bonus opportunity of 30% of your Eligible Quarterly Earnings (as defined in the Fiscal 2020 Performance Objectives For C-Level Employees) for each fiscal quarter of 2020. Consent to this adjustment is requested for fiscal 2020 only.


 


Please sign below to acknowledge and give your consent to this change to your target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


	 	
			Sincerely,


			 


			BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP, INC.


			 


			/s/ Eric Fencl


			 


			Eric Fencl


			Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel


			and Secretary

			



 


 


As described in this letter, I consent to the change to my target bonus opportunity for 2020.


 


 


/s/ Sharon Price John                   


Sharon Price John


 


 


Date:      October 6, 2020
output_EmissionLocation

FacilityID SourceID LocationTypeLongitude Latitude UTMzone SourceTypeLengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_mStackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_mExitGasTemp_K Elevation_mHillHeight

01073NEI8456 M_CC0002L -86.5293 33.54132 P 0 0 0 0 12.8016 3.076204 16.0212 300.3695

01073NEI8456 M_CP0003L -86.53 33.54127 P 0 0 0 0 38.1 0.9144 9.292159 354.9709

01073NEI8456 M_CU0001L -86.5297 33.54171 P 0 0 0 0 18.8976 0.508 15.80611 301.4805

01113NEI8627 M_CN0001L -84.9777 32.42984 P 0 0 0 0 60.96 2.5908 0.935246 565.343

01113NEI8627 M_CP0002L -84.9779 32.42979 P 0 0 0 0 60.96 2.4384 1.659797 606.45

18069NEI11753 M_CP0001L -85.468 40.88719 P 0 0 0 0 14.9352 1.2192 17.22071 361.9068

18169NEI32636 M_CL0003 L -85.8607 40.79631 P 0 0 0 0 10.668 0.8636 16.0212 300.3695

18169NEI32636 M_CO0002L -85.861 40.79607 P 0 0 0 0 10.9728 1.2192 16.0212 300.3695

18169NEI32636 M_CP0004L -85.861 40.79565 P 0 0 0 0 17.6784 1.2192 5.954979 385.1758

18169NEI32636 M_CP0005L -85.861 40.79565 P 0 0 0 0 17.6784 1.2192 7.456194 420.9842

18169NEI32636 M_CU0001L -85.8608 40.7958 P 0 0 0 0 10.0584 1.0668 12.50368 466.14

27049NEI12308 M_CP0001L -92.4834 44.55627 P 0 0 0 0 54.864 0.79248 68.17709 1114.798

48027NEI7836 M_CP0001L -97.5701 31.07539 P 0 0 0 0 59.436 1.03632 12.17714 320.3768

55127NEIWM_CP0001 IT$8308 L -88.6032 42.53709 P 0 0 0 0 20.7264 1.0668 11.5586 413.2002

Page 1
January 13, 2009 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S351 

take the oath or affirmation of office for the 

office of President of the United States or 

the office of Vice President of the United 

States, respectively.’’. 

(b) AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER ANALYSIS.— 

The chapter analysis for chapter 25 of title 

18, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘515. Prohibition on sale and counterfeiting 

of inaugural tickets.’’. 

f 

ORDERS FOR WEDNESDAY, 

JANUARY 14, 2009 

Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I 

ask unanimous consent that when the 

Senate completes its business today, it 

stand in adjournment until 9:30 a.m. 

tomorrow, January 14; that following 

the prayer and pledge, the Journal of 

proceedings be approved to date, the 

morning hour be deemed expired, the 

time for the two leaders be reserved for 

their use later in the day; that the Senate then resume consideration of S. 22, 

the lands bill, with time until 10:30 

a.m. divided equally and controlled between the two leaders or their designees; and that the cloture vote with 

respect to S. 22 occur at 10:30 a.m. 

I further ask that the filing deadline 

for second-degree amendments be 10 

a.m. tomorrow. 

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered. 

PROGRAM 

Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, 

the manager of the bill was unable to 

reach an agreement to consider amendments today. As a result of this impasse, the Senate will proceed to a cloture vote on the bill at 10:30 tomorrow. 

f 

ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M. 

TOMORROW 

Mr. LAUTENBERG. If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it 

adjourn under the previous order. 

There being no objection, the Senate, 

at 7:38 p.m., adjourned until Wednesday, January 14, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with SENATE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S319]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader is 
recognized.

                          ____________________
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 2805

_____________________________
B RYAN K EITH K INGERY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

. September 28, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , O STERHAUS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender; and Joel Arnold
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General; and Steven E. Woods
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion issued August 9, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00442-CR

———————————

JOHN JOE VALENCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1397404

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, John Joe Valencia, was found guilty by a jury of the capital felony 

offense of capital murder. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.03(a)(2) (West 2011). 

The trial court sentenced appellant to life imprisonment without parole. See TEX.
2

PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.31 (West Supp. 2015). Appellant timely filed a notice of 

appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, along 

with a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error and the appeal is 

without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396 (1967). Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record 

and legal authority. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel indicates that she has 

thoroughly reviewed the record and is unable to advance any grounds of error that 

warrant reversal. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State, 

193 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we 

conclude that no reversible error exists in the record, there are no arguable grounds 

for review, and the appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 

(emphasizing that reviewing court—and not counsel—determines, after full 

examination of proceedings, whether appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State, 

300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine 

whether arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–

27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (same); Mitchell, 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court 
3

determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record). We note that 

an appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds for appeal 

by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 

See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n.6.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw. Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this 

appeal and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1997). Attorney Deborah Summers must immediately send appellant the required 

notice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

6.5(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
----

----

| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                      |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

| Date:  May 2,      2008 | /s/ Thomas B.      Specketer       |   |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   | Thomas      B. Specketer           |   |
|                                   | Vice      President and Controller |   |
|                                   | (principal      financial officer) |   |

----

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of Absolute Potential, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that:

          1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Date: June 19, 2006                         /s/  Thomas F. Duszynski
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas F. Duszynski
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer



     This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for July 2021

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month			19

2. Cases Added to Docket				 0

  
3. Cases Subtracted from Docket				-1

Roy Rock, LLC 
No. 18-0068
Decision issued on July 22, 2021


4. Total Cases Pending End of Month			18
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Mission Community Bancorp (“the Company”) for the period ended December 31,2007, I, Anita M. Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             ThisForm 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 27, 2008

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Anita M. Robinson                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | Anita M. Robinson                     |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
0tfr-0ST-mU"l2 ^ 

Gogebic-Iron County Airport 

GOCit-niC'-TRON AIRPOR r BOARD 

Joseph Bonovetz. Chainnan 

Robert Berg Jim Oliver 

LeRoy Kangas Brian Tarro 

Bob Morm John Wiita 

Paul Muiiard Donna Scorse 

E5560 Airport Road 

Ironwood, Michigan 49938 

Phone: 906-932-3121 

FAX- 906-932^401 

e-mail: 

iwdairplane@flyfromironwood com 

Duane R. DuRay. Manager 

Mindy PrenderviHe, Admm Asst, 

January 10. 2012 

Dennis J. DcVany 

Chief, r-sscntial Air Son ice J^i\isio]i. .\-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Depailmcnl ot" Iransponation 

400 7'" street-SW 

Washinmon-D.C. 20050 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

At the regular scheduled niceling of the Gogehie-iron County Airport Board (iWD) held 

on Januiiry 9. 2012. the Airport Board had discussed the air ser\"ice proposal DO! -OST1W6-1266 submitted by Great Lakes Airlines. Lid. 

The Airport Board welcomes the proposal to pro\'ide air service into MSP with some 

reservations. J be schedule provided uidiin ihe proposal (see below) would put an 

undesirable burden on our traveling public trying to utilize this service with connecting 

nights compared to the schedule shown below in the next paragraph. 

Arrivals 

lime 

9:30AM 

4:00 PM 

Frequency 

12345() 

12.3457 

Departures 

rime 

^•.A5 A M 

4.4 5 PV 

[requcncv 

123456 

123457 

Our current flight schedule (sec below) with early morning, midaftemoon, and evening 

nights has established a very sueeessfUiU ridership record and repose with both business 

and leisure travelers utilizing this air sen. ice. 

Arrival 

(line 

4:18 PM 

*J:28 PM 

Frequency 

1234567 

123457 

Departures 

rime 

5:12 A M 

10:12 A M 

4:-l3 I'M 

1 requcncv 

123456 

-I 

! 23457 

i n understand cuiTeellv. 49 l.iSC. section 41732. basic essential air service requires 

nights at reasonable times considering the needs of pa.ssengers with connecting tlights. 

'I he Gogebic- Iron County Airport has experienced t)vcr a 30()"li increase in passenger 

enplanements and deplanemenis over the previous 8 month period with the current 

schedule (see above). This schedule meets the needs and desires olpassengers with 

connecting llighls. 
Aside Irotn the Hight schedule, the Air^iorl Board Feels (he reintroduclion oFMSP as the 

hub airport will be a very welcomed change that would prove to be a Favorable 

connecting airport. 

Sincereh'. 

/ G 

Duane DuRay 

Airport Manager 

/ / ' ^-^ 

Joseph Botiovetz 

Airport Board Chairman
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 330

June 1995

Walter Cartwright

Department of Industrial Relations

State Programs Division

602 Madison Avenue

Montgomery, Alabama 36131

TOPIC: GUIDELINES ON "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" FOR MINING

INQUIRY: We are looking for a copy of a state's manual or guidelines on "best 

management practices" for coal or non-coal mining or mineral extraction. 

SEARCH RESULTS: Pennsylvania provided a copy of their Guidelines. These are 

attached. 

ATTACHMENTS

A. Hellier, William W., P.E. "Best Professional Judgment Analysis For The 

Treatment Of Post-Mining Discharges From Surface Mining Activities" (8/94).
(September 19, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orlando Brisko, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 516]

Judgment, *494Supreme County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered July 26, 1991, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and attempted sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s plea of guilty operated as a waiver of his statutory speedy trial claim under CPL 30.30 *(People v Friscia,*51 NY2d 845; *People v Penna,*203 AD2d 392, *lv denied*84 NY2d 830). Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim, raised *pro se,*was properly rejected without a hearing for failure to adduce facts concerning the claimed delay (CPL 210.45 [5]; *People v Price,*145 AD2d 445, *lv denied*73 NY2d 895). Insofar as that issue was raised by counsel in a motion that was served on the People but never filed with the court, review is precluded by lack of an adequate record that includes, among other things, the minutes of any adjournments *(People v Anderson,*216 AD2d 257; *People v James,*188 AD2d 296). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
**Outline of Transport Rule Revisions for Program Implementation**

III. Specific Revisions A. Budgets/New Unit Set - aside Revisions
 Of approximately 3,600 units in the Transport Rule EGU inventory, proposal would revise control assumptions at only about a dozen units , based on updated information about planned controls.  Proposal includes re - calculation of new unit set - asides in a couple of states to account for new facilities coming online, to ensure allowance availability to new units  Proposal also conside rs new information provided by utilities and system operators regarding immediate - term operational constraints that drive out - of -merit - order dispatch of certain units, whose emissions would affect the calculation of Transport Rule state budgets  Results in revisions to budgets in FL, LA, MI, MS, NE, NJ, NY, TX, and WI, and revisions to new unit set - asides in AR and TX B. Allowance Allocation Revisions to Units Covered by Existing Utility Consent Decrees  Proposal aligns allocations to units under consent decrees to match their maximum allowable emissions, which ensures that all other allowances under that state budget remain available to other sourcesC. Amend the Assurance Penalty Provisions to Make Them

E ffective S tarting in 2014  Starting the assurance p rovisions in 2014 will help promote the pace of robust allowance market development and will encourage trading to go forward immediately for reductions in the 2012 - 2013 timeframe  Smoothes transition from CAIR to Transport Rule programs D. Correct Typographical Errors  These edits are cosmetic corrections . IV . Recordation of Transport Rule Allowances

 EPA will record 99.7% of allowances from final Transport Rule on schedule for program implementation and promotion of markets ; the other 0.3%, plus any new allowances resulting from the proposed revisions, will be recorded promptly after issuance of the final revisions rule.
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-45324, No. 33-57339,
No. 333-108312, No. 333-111093 and No. 333-112450), and S-8 (No. 2-96127, No. 33-24068, No. 33-41434, No. 33-53733, No. 33-55449, No. 33-45970, No. 33-14458, No. 33-50149, No. 33-55456,
No. 333-15509, No. 333-76939, No. 333-67008, No. 333-64154, No. 333-59668, No. 333-89318, No. 333-98619, No. 333-98623 and No. 333-125005) of Wyeth of our report dated February 23, 2006 relating to the
financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
|Florham Park, NJ February 27, 2006
|
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Stephen G. Allen

Page 1 of 1

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 88

July 30, 1987

Ron Reeves, Legal Counsel

Texas Railroad Commission

Surface Mining & Reclamation Division

1701 N. Congress Ave.

William B. Travis Bldg., 7th Floor

Austin, Texas 78704

TOPIC: PRE-EXISTING STRUCTURES

INQUIRY: (1) What is the definition of pre-existing structures? (2) Would a stream that was 

diverted from its original channel prior to enactment of SMCRA be considered a pre-existing 

structure? (3) Locate any cases, legislative history, etc. on pre-existing structures. 

SEARCH RESULTS: Pre-existing structures are discussed in the applicability section of 30 

CFR Sec. 710.11(d). This discussion is in connection with the initial regulatory program and 

bringing these pre-existing, nonconforming structures or facilities up to standards and into 

compliance with interim program regulations. (30 CFR Sec. 710.11(d)(2)). The scope of this 

section appears to cover only those structures that are pre-existing, noncomforming and used to 

facilitate mining on or after the date set by the regulatory authority. Structures used on or after 

this date, even though classified pre-existing must have been modified to meet interim program 

standards. 

___________________________________________________________________________

Four cases were found that relate to pre-existing structures. Most relate to litigation over whether 

the particular structure met appropriate compliance standards, and generally did not define a 

"pre-existing" structure.

ATTACHMENTS

A. Excerpt, 30 CFR Sec. 710.11. 

B. JOSEPHINE COAL CO. v OSM, No. CH 0-52-R, NX 5-18-P (1986). 

C. BELVA COAL CO., INC. v OSM, No. CH 0-17-P (1980). 

D. N&G CONSTRUCTION v OSM, No. CH 9-15-R (1980). 

E. ZAPATA COAL CORP., 2 IBSMA 9 (1980).