alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1081 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1081

   To eliminate the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security 
regarding the definition of the term ``official purpose'' as it applies 
 to drivers' licenses and personal identification cards, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2017

  Mr. Emmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To eliminate the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security 
regarding the definition of the term ``official purpose'' as it applies 
 to drivers' licenses and personal identification cards, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ``OFFICIAL PURPOSE'' FOR DRIVERS' LICENSES AND 
              PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION CARDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 201(3) of the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami 
Relief, 2005 (Public Law 109-13; 119 Stat. 312; 49 U.S.C. 30301 note) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes but is not limited to'' and 
        inserting ``means'';
            (2) by striking ``aircraft, entering'' and inserting 
        ``aircraft, and entering''; and
            (3) by striking ``, and any other purposes that the 
        Secretary shall determine''.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
submit to Congress a report on the implementation of the amendments 
made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MATTHEW P. DEC, 

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 23 WM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2022, the “Application for Extra Ordinary [sic] 

Relief in the Form of Supercedeas [sic]” is DENIED.
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-12892) of Mission Community Bancorp of our report of independent registered
public accounting firm dated March 12, 2009, on our audit of the consolidated
balance sheets of Mission Community Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholder’s equity and cash flows for the years then ended, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY
& CO., LLP


Laguna
Hills, California


March 13,
2009
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50096 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LETICIA MARTINEZ, also known as Leticia Torres, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-214-1

- - - - - - - - - - September 20, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leticia Martinez appeals from her conviction and sentence following her guilty plea to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. She argues that her guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary, that she received ineffective assistance of counsel because her attorney advised her that she would probably receive probation if she pleaded guilty, and that the district court erred by refusing to grant her a reduction forNo. 96-50096 -2- acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Martinez's guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered. See United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Martinez has not demonstrated a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged statement by her attorney regarding her probable sentence, she would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted upon going to trial. See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 57-58 (1985). Finally, the district court did not clearly err by denying her a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Wilder , 15 F.3d 1292, 1298 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1210 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2017 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PLEASANTON VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 122 W. Goodwin Street, 

6 Pleasanton, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1210 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Pleasanton Veterans 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
#### In re John M. and Marilyn KAPSOS, Debtors.

Bankruptcy No. 81-01105-BKC-TCB.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S. D. Florida.

Feb. 8, 1982.

Margaret Cangilos, Miami, Fla., for trustee.

Mikel D. Greene, West Palm Beach, Fla., for debtors.

ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The debtors in this chapter 7 case have moved for voluntary dismissal. (C. P. No. *8917). The trustee has objected. (C. P. No. 19). The motion was heard on February 2.

The debtors’ discharge was denied under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) and (B) [fraudulent transfers both before and after bankruptcy]) (4)(A) [false oath], and (5) [failure to explain loss of assets]. Bkrtcy, 16 B.R. 280. Discharge had been opposed by the trustee. The trustee has scheduled a public auction sale of the debtors’ non-exempt household furnishings. It was at this point that the debtors, concluding that bankruptcy now offered them no benefit, moved for dismissal.

The matter is governed by § 707, which merely requires notice, a hearing and “cause”. Though there is no indication in § 707 that a voluntary dismissal for the debtor’s benefit is permissible, I conclude that it is not foreclosed and that B.R. 120(a) insofar as it permits a voluntary dismissal is still applicable. Pub.L. 95-598, § 405(d); 4 *Collier on Bankruptcy*(15th ed.) § 707.01.

Dismissal, unless this court orders otherwise, would permit the debtors to move to another district, file again and, possibly, obtain the discharge that has been denied here. § 349(a). Dismissal would also block the sale and, therefore, preclude compensation to the trustee for his efforts to date and preclude any present distribution to the creditors. While beneficial to the debtors, these results would clearly be against the creditors’ interests.

Neither the Code nor this court exist for the exclusive benefit of either the debtor or his creditors whose interests are inherently opposed. In this instance, the adjustment of those competing interests has been left to the court’s discretion. To me, the question is not even close. The motion to dismiss is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - [Docket No. USCG-2024-0884]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice; request for applications; correction.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard published a notice on October 22, 2024, regarding two vacancies on the Great Lakes Pilotage Advisory Committee (Committee). The Great Lakes Pilotage Advisory Committee provides advice and makes recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security via the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard on matters relating to Great Lakes pilotage. The October 22 notice contained incorrect vacancy descriptions. This document corrects those errors.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Francis Levesque, Alternate Designated Federal Officer of the Great Lakes Pilotage Advisory Committee; telephone 571-308-4941 or email at                         *francis.r.levesque@uscg.mil.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 22, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-0884, on page 84360, in the third column, correct sub-paragraphs one and two to read: 1. “One member chosen from among nominations made by Great Lakes port authorities and marine terminals;”                    

2. One member chosen from among nominations made by Great Lakes maritime labor organizations.”

Dated: November 1, 2024.

Michael T. Cunningham,

Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.

[FR Doc. 2024-25770 Filed 11-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 20

- 00233

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 462nd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 60916

- 393

B ef ore Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### J.L. AND 

### J.L., C HILDREN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant ’ s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal

, ” which is

uno pposed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)( 1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : January 14, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED
LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,082
<SECURITIES>                                    15,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                     13,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,319
<PP&E>                                          25,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,474
<BONDS>                                            969
<COMMON>                                            13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,370
<SALES>                                         18,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,335
<CGS>                                            9,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (72)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                       831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
No. 86-517.

No. 86-5431.

No. 86-5453.

No. 86-5589.

No. 86-5597.

No. 86-5605.

No. 86-5606.

No. 86-5838.

#### Boles *v.*Ellis et al., Martin *v.*Sears, Roebuck *&*Co., Tichnell *v.*Maryland, Taylor *v.*Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Becker *v.*Suffolk County Legal Aid Division, Becker *v.*Arcadian Gardens, Becker *v.*Henry Modells & Co., Inc., In re Clough,

*ante,*p. 962;

*ante,*p. 990;

*ante,*p. 995;

*ante,*p. 990;

*ante,*p. 991;

*ante,*p. 991;

*ante,*p. 991; and

*ante,*p. 1004. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation May 24

, 2016

Docket Management Sy stem

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ExemptionNo. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) is requesting an amendment to our FAA Exemption No.

11467, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. AIR

wishes to add the following aircraft to it’s section 333 exemption :

1. MMC Spider

- E6x (exhibit 1)

2. MMC Phoenix

- A6 (exhibit 2)

3. MMC Swift

- F4 (exhibit 3)

For your ease in reviewing this request, pleas e refer to the exhibit list which begins on page 2 and

3

.

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503

- 312

- 9804 or via email at Drew.P@air

- uas.com.

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director of Regulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc.

### Table of Contents

Exhibits

Exhibit 1:



# MMC S pider

- E6 x

Parameter Value

L

- W

- H(mm) 1315 ( L ) *1190 ( W ) *520 ( H )

Pro peller(mm) 410( 16	inches )

Weight 3.60kg (7.93	pounds)

Max.	take

- off	w e ight 12kg (26.45	pounds)

Max.	flight time 25minutes

Fuselage & arm &	landing	gear Carbon	fiber	&	aviation	&	CNC	aluminum

Structure Foldable

Battery 1000/16000/22000mAh

Max. wind	resistance 12m/s (23.3knots )

Operating	Temp,

- 10°	to	50°	C

### Exhibit 2 :



# MMC Phoenix

- A6

Parameter Value

L

- W

- H(mm) 2280

- 2 0 70

- 620

Pro peller(mm) 730	( 28	inches )

Max.	take

- off	w e ight 18kg	(39.7	pounds)

Max. L oad payload 3kg (6.6	pounds)

Max.	flight time 75 minutes

Fuselage & arm &	landing	gear Carbon	fiber	&	aviation	&	CNC	aluminum

Battery 1000/16000/22000mAh

Max.	wind resistance 9 m/s (17.5	knots)

Operating	Temp.

- 10	°to	50°	C



### Exhibit 3:



# MMC	Swift

- F4

Parameter Value

Propeller L

- W

- H(mm) 2000

- 1200

- 400

Max.	take

- off	w e ight 22.6	kg	(49.8	pounds)

Max. L oad payload 10	kg	(22	pounds)

Max.	flight ti me 16	min

Fuselage & arm &	landing	gear Carbon	fiber	&	aviation	&	CNC	aluminum

Battery 1 6000 mAh

Max.	wind	resistance 10 m/s ( 19.4 knots)

Operating	Temp.

- 10	°to	50°	C
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H281-H282]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

  Mr. MANZULLO. Mr. Speaker, a family emergency required me to miss the 
last series of votes held today. Had I been present, I would have voted 
``no'' on rollcall No. 17 (H. Res. 53) and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 18 
(H. Res. 40).

[[Page H282]]

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (23,752)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                                                          State of
Subsidiary                                             Incorporation
----------                                             -------------

AMREP Metro Services, Inc.                             New York
AMREP Saratoga Construction, Inc.                      New York
AMREP Solutions, Inc.                                  New York
AMREP Southwest Inc.                                   New Mexico
      Advance Financial Corp.                          New Mexico
      AMREP Construction Corporation                   New Mexico
      AMREP Financial Corp.                            New Mexico
      AMREP Insurance Agency, Inc.                     New Mexico
      AMREP Metro Works, Inc.                          New York
             PERMA Corp.                               New York
                  Strickland Construction Corp.        New Jersey
      AMREP Southeast, Inc.                            Florida
             AMREP Saratoga Square Homes, Inc.         Florida
      AMREPCO Inc.                                     Colorado
      Carity-Hoffman Associates, Inc.                  New York
      Double R Realty, Inc.                            New Mexico
      Eldorado at Santa Fe, Inc.                       New Mexico
      Lexington Homes Northwest, Inc.                  Oregon
      M.F.G. Realty Corp.                              New York
      New Mexico Foreign Trade Zone Corp.              New Mexico
      Rancho Homes, Inc.                               New Mexico
      Rio Rancho Golf & Country Club, Inc.             New Mexico
      S.G.R. Realty Corp.                              New Jersey
      Shasta Real Estate Company                       California
      Sun Oaks Realty Corp.                            Florida
      Rio Venture XV, Inc.                             New Mexico
El Dorado Utilities, Inc.                              New Mexico
Florida Ridge Utilities Corp.                          Florida
Kable News Company, Inc.                               Illinois
      Kable Fulfillment Services of Ohio, Inc.         Delaware
      Kable News Company of Canada, Ltd.               Ontario, Canada
      Kable News Export, Ltd.                          Delaware
      Kable News International, Inc.                   Delaware
      Distribunet Inc.                                 Delaware
      Magazine Connection Inc.                         Delaware