Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 91335 

1See Mattresses from Indonesia: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 47528 (June 3, 2024) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 23, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of 2022–2023 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated October 2, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022– 

2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Mattresses from Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, Republic of Turkey, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 

Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order). 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4. 

uncoated, that has been folded (or creased in 

preparation to be folded), glued, taped, 

bound, or otherwise assembled to be suitable 

for holding documents. The scope includes 

all such folders, regardless of color, whether 

or not expanding, whether or not laminated, 

and with or without tabs, fasteners, closures, 

hooks, rods, hangers, pockets, gussets, or 

internal dividers. The term ‘‘primarily’’ as 

used in the first sentence of this scope means 

50 percent or more of the total product 

weight, exclusive of the weight of fasteners, 

closures, hooks, rods, hangers, removable 

tabs, and similar accessories, and exclusive 

of the weight of the packaging. 

Subject folders have the following 

dimensions in their folded and closed 

position: lengths and widths of at least 8 

inches and no greater than 17 inches, 

regardless of depth. 

The scope covers all varieties of folders, 

including but not limited to manila folders, 

hanging folders, fastener folders, 

classification folders, expanding folders, 

pockets, jackets, and wallets. 

Excluded from the scope are: 

• mailing envelopes with a flap bearing 

one or more adhesive strips that can be used 

permanently to seal the entire length of a side 

such that, when sealed, the folder is closed 

on all four sides; 

• binders, with two or more rings to hold 

documents in place, made of paperboard or 

pressboard encased entirely in plastic; 

• binders consisting of a front cover, back 

cover, and spine, with or without a flap; to 

be excluded, a mechanism with two or more 

metal rings must be included on or adjacent 

to the interior spine; 

• non-expanding folders with a depth 

exceeding 2.5 inches and that are closed or 

closeable on the top, bottom, and all four 

sides (e.g., boxes or cartons); 

• expanding folders that have: (1) 13 or 

more pockets; (2) a flap covering the top; (3) 

a latching mechanism made of plastic and/ 

or metal to close the flap; and (4) an affixed 

plastic or metal carry handle; 

• folders that have an outer surface (other 

than the gusset, handles, and/or closing 

mechanisms, if any) that is covered entirely 

with fabric, leather, and/or faux leather; 

• fashion folders, which are defined as 

folders with all of the following 

characteristics: (1) plastic lamination 

covering the entire exterior of the folder; (2) 

printing, foil stamping, embossing (i.e., 

raised relief patterns that are recessed on the 

opposite side), and/or debossing (i.e., 

recessed relief patterns that are raised on the 

opposite side), covering the entire exterior 

surface area of the folder; (3) at least two 

visible and printed or foil stamped colors 

(other than the color of the base paper), each 

of which separately covers no less than 10 

percent of the entire exterior surface area; 

and (4) patterns, pictures, designs, or artwork 

covering no less than thirty percent of the 

exterior surface area of the folder; 

• portfolios, which are folders having: (1) 

a width of at least 16 inches when open flat; 

(2) no tabs or dividers; and (3) one or more 

pockets that are suitable for holding letter 

size documents and that cover at least 15 

percent of the surface area of the relevant 

interior side or sides; and 

• report covers, which are folders having: 

(1) no tabs, dividers, or pockets; and (2) one 

or more fasteners or clips, each of which is 

permanently affixed to the center fold, to 

hold papers securely in place. 

Imports of the subject merchandise are 

provided for under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

category 4820.30.0040. Subject imports may 

also enter under other HTSUS classifications. 

While the HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

investigation is dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2024–26888 Filed 11–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–836] 

Mattresses From Indonesia: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT Grantec 

Jaya Indonesia (collectively, Ecos/ 

Grantec) and one non-individually 

examined company made sales of 

subject merchandise in the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR), 

May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023. 

Additionally, Commerce determines 

that PT. Zinus Global Indonesia (Zinus 

Indonesia) did not make sales of 

mattresses from Indonesia at prices 

below NV during the POR. Moreover, 

we are rescinding this review with 

respect to one company that withdrew 

its request for review and 29 companies 

that had no reviewable entries during 

the POR. 

DATES: Applicable November 19, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Noah Wetzel, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–7466, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 3, 2024, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review and invited 

interested parties to comment.1 On July 

23, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.2 On October 

2, 2024, Commerce extended the 

deadline for the final results of this 

administrative review until November 

12, 2024.3 For a summary of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is mattresses from Indonesia. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is included in 

appendix I. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received, we made one change to the 

margin calculation in the Preliminary 

Results for Ecos/Grantec.6


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
91336 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, in Part,’’ dated June 4, 2024. 

8See, e.g., Forged Steel Fittings from Taiwan: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 71317, 71318 (November 

9, 2020); see also Certain Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe from Mexico: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 83 FR 54084 (October 26, 2018). 

9See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, in Part,’’ dated October 3, 2024. 

11See appendix II, where all companies for which 

we have rescinded this review are listed. 12We are treating these companies as a single 

entity for purposes of this review. For a complete 

discussion, see Memorandum, ‘‘Affiliation and 

Collapsing of PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia and PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia,’’ dated December 8, 2022. 

13See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012). 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if all parties who requested a 

review withdraw their requests within 

90 days of the date that the notice of 

initiation of the requested review was 

published in the Federal Register. In the 

Preliminary Results, we intended to 

rescind this review with respect to PT 

Champion Mattress Indonesia 

Manufacturing (PTC) because PTC had 

timely withdrawn its request for review 

and no other interested party requested 

a review of this company. However, 

because we inadvertently did not 

rescind this review with respect to PTC 

in the Preliminary Results, we issued an 

intent-to-rescind memorandum and 

provided interested parties with the 

opportunity to comment on this matter.7

Because PTC timely withdrew its 

request for review of itself and no other 

parties requested a review of PTC, 

Commerce is rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

PTC. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), 

when there are no reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

subject to the antidumping duty order 

for which liquidation is suspended, 

Commerce may also rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or only 

with respect to a particular exporter or 

producer.8 At the end of the 

administrative review, any suspended 

entries are liquidated at the assessment 

rate computed for the review period.9

Therefore, for an administrative review 

to be conducted, there must be a 

reviewable, suspended entry to be 

liquidated at the newly calculated 

assessment rate. On October 3, 2024, 

Commerce informed interested parties 

that it intended to rescind this review 

with respect to 29 companies because 

those companies had no reviewable, 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise and invited parties to 

comment.10 We received no comments 

on our preliminary rescission of the 

review with respect to these companies. 

Accordingly, in the absence of 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for these 

29 companies for which this review was 

initiated, we are hereby rescinding this 

administrative review, in part, with 

respect to these companies, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3).11

Rate for Non-Examined Respondent 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a weighted-average 

dumping margin to be determined for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when determining the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. 

Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 

the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an 

amount equal to the weighted average of 

the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins established for 

exporters and producers individually 

investigated, excluding any zero or de 

minimis margins, and any margins 

determined entirely {on the basis of 

facts available}.’’ We calculated a 

dumping margin for Ecos/Grantec that is 

not zero, de minimis, or determined 

entirely on the basis of facts available. 

Accordingly, we assigned a margin of 

30.32 percent based on Ecos/Grantec’s 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margin to the non-selected respondent, 

PT Graha Seribusatujaya. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

PT Ecos Jaya Indonesia/PT 

Grantec Jaya Indonesia 12 ...... 30.32 

PT. Zinus Global Indonesia ........ 0.00 

PT Graha Seribusatujaya ........... 30.32 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.13

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results of 

review to interested parties within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where the respondent Ecos/Grantec 

reported the entered value for their U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those sales. Where Ecos/ 

Grantec did not report entered value, we 

calculated an importer-specific, per-unit 

assessment rate based on the ratio of the 

total amount of dumping calculated for 

the importer’s examined sales to the 

total quantity of those sales. For Zinus 

Indonesia, whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero, and for any 

importers whose importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.14

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Ecos/Grantec or Zinus Indonesia for 

which the reviewed companies did not 

know that the merchandise they sold to 

the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2024 / Notices 91337 

15For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

16See Order. 

1See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 50639 (October 9, 

2018) (Order). 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.15

For the company that was not selected 

for individual review, we assigned an 

assessment rate calculated as noted in 

the ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined 

Respondent’’ section, above. 

For the companies for which this 

review is rescinded with these final 

results (see appendix II), we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on any suspended entries at a 

rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review; (2) for producers or exporters 

not covered in this review but covered 

in a prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the most recently 

completed segment; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will continue to be 2.22 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation in this 

proceeding.16 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 12, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Treatment of Disputed 

Expenses 

Comment 2: Application of the 

Transactions Disregarded Rule 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies for Which We Are 

Rescinding the Administrative Review 

1. Bali Natural Latex 

2. CV. Aumireta Anggun 

3. CV. Lautan Rezeki 

4. Duta Abadi Primantara, Pt 

5. Ecos Jaya JL Pasir Awi 

6. Mimpi 

7. P.T. Barat Daya Gemilang 

8. PT Celebes Putra Prima 

9. PT Champion Mattress Indonesia 

Manufacturing 

10. PT Demak Putra Mandiri 

11. PT Graha Anom Jaya 

12. PT Kline Total Logistics Indonesia 

13. PT Rubberfoam Indonesia 

14. PT Solo Murni Epte 

15. PT. Ateja Multi Industri 

16. PT. Ateja Tritunggal 

17. PT. Aurora World Cianjur 

18. PT. Cahaya Buana Furindotama 

19. PT. CJ Logistics Indonesia 

20. PT. Dinamika Indonusa Prima 

21. PT. Dunlopillo Indonesia 

22. PT. Dynasti Indomegah 

23. PT. Massindo International 

24. PT. Ocean Centra Furnindo 

25. PT. Quantum Tosan Internasional 

26. PT. Romance Bedding & Furniture 

27. PT. Royal Abadi Sejahtera 

28. PT. Transporindo Buana Kargotama 

29. Sonder Canada Inc 

30. Super Poly Industry PT 

[FR Doc. 2024–26906 Filed 11–18–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–877] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Preliminary Results and Rescission, in 

Part, of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers and/or exporters of 

stainless steel flanges (flanges) from 

India made sales of subject merchandise 

in the United States at prices below 

normal value (NV) during the period of 

review (POR) October 1, 2022, through 

September 30, 2023. In addition, we are 

rescinding this review for three 

companies. We invite interested parties 

to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable November 19, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benito Ballesteros or Eric Chen, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4725 or (202) 482–2860, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 9, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on flanges from 

India.1 On December 6, 2023, based on 

timely requests for review, Commerce 

initiated an administrative review (AD) 

of the Order covering 16 companies, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1