## Petition for Determin ation of Nonregulated Status

for Rootworm

- Resistant Event 5307 Corn

Petition Number 10

- 336

- 01p

OECD Unique Identifier: SYN

- Ø53Ø7

- 1

Submitted By :



### D emetra Vlachos Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc.

P.O. Box 12257

3054 E. Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

S ubmission Date : 

### April 22 , 201 1

Author s :



### Demetra Vlachos and Scott A. Huber

Contributors:



### Mark Bednarcik, Anic de Framond, Gerson Graser, Brian Harper, Hope Hart, Wendelyn Jones, Karen Launis, Andrew Noe, Lisa McCormick, Moez Meghji, Linda Meyer, Heather Moore, Andrea Nelson, Stephen New, Narendra 

### Palekar,

Katie Pence, Alan Raybould, Alaina Sauvé

, Laura Seastrum, Shuang Song,

Frederick W alters, Dennis Ward , Keith Ward

, and James White

Syngenta Petition ID:



### 5307

- USDA

- 1

Page 1 of 2115307

- USDA

- 1 Page 2 of 211 

### Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status



### The undersigned submits this petition under 7 CFR § 340.6 to request that the Administrator make a determination that the article should not be regulated under 7 CFR § 340.

Certification



### The undersigned certifies that, to the best knowledge and belief of the undersigned, this petition includes all information and views on which to base a determination, and that it includes relevant data and information known to the petitioner that are unfavorable to the petition.

Petitioner:

Demetra Vlachos , M.S. Regulatory Affairs Manager

Mailing Address: Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc.

P.O. Box 12257

3054 East Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

USA

Telephone : 919. 226

- 7383

Facsimile : 919. 226

- 7462

Email: demetra.vlachos@syngenta.com

© 2010 , 2011 Syn genta. All Rights Reserved.

This document is protected under copyright law. This document is for use only by the regulatory authority to which this has been submitted by Syngenta, and only in support of actions requested by Syngenta. Any other use of th is material, without prior written consent of Syngenta, is strictly prohibited. By submitting this document, Syngenta does not grant any party or entity any right or license to the information or intellectual property described

in this document.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 3 of 211 

### Release of Information



### Syngenta Biotechnology, Incorporated (Syngenta) is subm itting the information in this

p etition for review by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as part of a federal regulatory process. Except in accordance with the following , Syngenta does not authorize the release, publication, or other distribution of this information (including internet posting) to any third party without prior notice and Syngenta ’s consent

. In responding to a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. §552 and 7 CFR § 1, relating to all or some of the information in this petition, Syngenta expects that, in advance of the release of the information, USDA will provide Syngenta with a copy of the FOIA request and the material proposed to b e released, and the opportunity to object to the release of information based on appropriate legal grounds (e.g.

, responsiveness, trade secret, and/or commercial concerns). Syngenta expects that no information submitted with this petition

and identified a s Confidential Business Information (CBI) will be disclosed to any third
party.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 4 of 211 

### Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status

for Rootworm

- Resistant Event 5307 Corn

Summary of the Petition



### Using the techniques of modern molecular biology, Syngenta has transformed corn ( maize

, Zea mays L.), to produce E vent 5307 corn ( also referred to hereafter to as “ 5307 corn ” ), a

new cultivar t hat is highly resistant to larval feeding damage by western corn rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera virgif era Le Conte ) , northern corn rootworm ( D

. longicornis barberi

Smith and Lawrence ) and Mexican corn rootworm ( D. virgifera zeae Krysan and Smith )

. These important coleopteran pests cause significant damage to the U.S. corn crop annually.

Event 5307 corn plants contain the transgene ecry3.1Ab encoding a novel rootworm

- control protein, eCry3.1Ab

, and the trans gene pmi (also known as manA ) encoding the enzyme phosphomannose isomerase (PMI). The eCry3.1Ab protein is an engineered chimera of the

modified Cry3A (mCry3A) and Cry1Ab proteins , members of a class of insecticidal proteins

derived from Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt )

. The gene pmi was obtained from Escherichia coli

strain K

- 12 and the protein it encodes was utilized as a plant selectable marke r duri ng development of 5307 corn

.

Event 5307 corn was produced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

- mediated transformation of

immature corn embryos using plasmid vector pSYN12274 . The region between the left and right borders of the transformation plasmid included ec ry3.1Ab and pmi gene expression cassettes; this DNA was transferred into the corn genome during transformation. The ecry3.1Ab expression cassette consisted of the ecry3.1Ab coding region regulated by the CMP promoter region from the cestrum yellow leaf virus and the nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator sequence . The pmi expression cassette consisted of the pmi coding region regulated by the ZmUbiInt promoter and the NOS terminator sequence.

Southern blot analyses demonstrate t hat 5307 corn (1) contains, at a single locus within the

corn genome, a single copy each of the gene ecry3.1Ab , its CMP promoter sequence, the marker gene pmi , its ZmUbiInt promoter sequence, and the two expected copies of the NOS terminator sequence, one NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry3.1Ab and one NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ; (2) does not contain any extraneous DNA fragments of

these functional elements inserted elsewhere in the corn genome; and (3) does not contain backbone sequence fr om the transformation plasmid, pSYN12274.

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the transferred DNA (T

- DNA) insert in 5307 corn confirms that the insert is intact and that the organization of the functional elements therein is identical to their organization wit hin pSYN12274. One nucleotide change from the sequence of pSYN12274 was identified 48 base pairs (bp) upstream of the CMP promoter in

a non coding region of the Event 5307 insert in corn . However, this nucleotide change had no effect on the functionality of the insert. Additionally, the analysis indicates that some truncation of the nucleotide sequence occurred at the 5' and 3' ends of the T

- DNA during the transformation process that resulted in Event 5307 corn ; such truncation occurs commonly

in transfor mation via Agrobacterium . The entire right border and three bp of non coding5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 5 of 211 

### sequence at the 5 ′ end of the insert, and eight bp of the left border were truncated; however, these deletions had no effect on the functionality of the insert.

Sequence analysis of the T

- DNA insertion site demonstrate d that 3 3 b p of corn genomic sequence were deleted when the 5307 insert integrated into the corn genome. Bioinformatic analyses indicated that the insert does not disrupt any known endogenous corn gene. A putative 243

- bp nov el open reading frame (ORF) spanning the junction between corn genomic sequence and the 3 ′ region of the 5307 corn insert was identified. The translated

81

- amino

- acid sequence encoded by the putative ORF showed no biologically relevant

sequence similarity to known or putative toxins or allergens. These data collectively demonstrate that there are no deleterious changes in the 5307 corn genome as a result of the

T

- DNA insertion.

Observations of ecry3.1Ab and pmi segregation ratios over several generations of 5307 corn plants are consistent with linkage of these transgenes at a single locus in the corn genome. These data and the results from Southern blot analyses of several generations of 5307 corn plants indicat e that the T

- DNA inser t has integrated into the nuclea r genome and that the transgenic locus is stably inherited during conventional breeding.

These genetic characterization data demonstrate that, apart from a single nucleotide change in a noncoding region of the T

- DNA insert, there are no unintended changes in the 5307

corn genome as a result of the T

- DNA insertion.

Laboratory, greenhouse, growth chamber, and field investigations with 5307 corn confirmed that there were no changes in seed, pollen, plant phenotypic, or composition parameters suggestive of increased plant pest risk. Compositional assessment of the grain and forage from multiple U.S. field sites demonstrate that 5307 corn is nutritionally and compositionally equivalent to, and as safe and n utritious as, its conventional counterpart. Corn does not possess weedy properties or outcross to wild relatives in the U.S.; these properties of corn have not been altered in 5307 corn.

W ell

- characterized mode s of action, physi c ochemical properties, and results of safety

studies demonstrate that the eCry3.1Ab and PMI proteins present in 5307 corn present no risk of harm for mammalian species.

Laboratory testing has shown n o adverse effects on survival associated with exposures of eCry3.1Ab in a range of nontarget indicator species appropriate for a corn ecosystem. There

was a 20% reduction in adult ground beetle weight observed after larvae of P oecilus cupreus were exposed to 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet throughout their development , but b ecause the

larvae we re tested at extreme exposure concentrations with no adverse effects on survival and only minor effects on growth, the effects of eCry3.1Ab on ground beetles are likely to be negligible under field exposure conditions . The eCry3.1Ab exposures in all studi es were in excess of estimated environmental exposure levels for the nontarget organism groups represented, indicating a low probability of harm for nontarget organisms inhabiting corn ecosystems.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 6 of 211 

### The narrow spectrum of insecticidal activity observed fo r eCry3.1Ab indicates with high certainty that no endangered or threatened species , with the potential exception of those belonging to the order Coleoptera

, c ould be harmed by eCry3.1Ab via 5307 corn if opportunities for exposure existed

. However, none of the 17 species of endangered or threatened Coleoptera listed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service is a member of the Chrysomelidae family, which is the only family of Coleoptera shown to be susceptible to eCry3.1Ab at the concentrations in 5307 plants. Moreover, due to their feeding habits and

non

- agricultural habitats, the re is negligible opportunity for endangered or threatened Coleoptera to be expose d to eCry3.1Ab via 5307 corn cultivation.

Syngenta knows of no study results or observat ions associated with 5307 corn that are anticipated to result in adverse consequences to the quality of the human environment, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. This includes a lack of anticipated adverse effects on endangered or threatened species l isted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , unique geographic areas, critical habitats, public health and safety (including children and minorities), genetic diversity of corn , farmer or consumer choice, insect resistance, or the economy, either within or outside the U.S. In the near future, Syngenta intends to submit an Environmental Report containing additional information and analysis of potential environmental impacts that is not required by the regulations governing petitions for non

regulated status , but which is intended to assist APHIS in fulfilling its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq ., as well as other applicable statutes and regulations.

Event 5307 corn will not be commercialized as a stand

- alone product. Rather, it will be combined via conventional plant breeding with other insect

- control traits as well as

herbicide

- tolerance traits in hybrid corn product offerings to growers . These hybrids will

offer high efficacy, convenience, and an ad ditional choice for protection of corn crops from feeding damage caused by important corn pests. As such, the use of 5307 corn as a component of these corn hybrids is expected to produce beneficial effects similar to previously deregulated Bt corn products that are commercially available. These benefits

include reduced insecticide use, improved worker safety, reductions in the use of fossil fuels to apply chemical insecticides, economic benefits for growers, and increased competition in

the market place for insect

- protected seed products. Moreover, the novel mode of action of

the eCry3.1Ab protein is expected to extend the useful life of Bt corn technology , as well as other methods, for corn rootworm control in general

, by reducing the selection pr essure for resistance among target pests.

The combination of eCry3.1Ab and modified Cry3A (via Syngenta’s deregulated E vent MIR604 corn) in the same corn hybrids will also justify a reduction in the size of the required on

- farm refuge from a minimum of 2 0% of a grower’s corn acres to 5%. This will have additional economic benefits for the grower, will further reduce insecticide use for rootworm control, and will promote grower compliance with refuge requirements

. Appropriate refuge requirements will be implemented in the context of a comprehensive insect resistance management program mandated by the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 7 of 211 

### Table of Contents
Page

Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status

................................ ...................... 2

Certification

................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 2

Release of Information

................................ ................................ ................................ . 3

Summary of the Petition

................................ ................................ ............................... 4

List of Tables

................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 12

List of Figures

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 14

Abbreviations and Acronyms

................................ ................................ ...................... 16

I. Rationale for Submission of Request for Deregulation

................................ ....... 19

I.A. Basis for the Request for a Determinat ion of Nonregulated Status

............................. 19

I.B. Rationale for Development of Event 5307 Corn

................................ ....................... 20

I.C. Regulatory Process

................................ ................................ .............................. 21

I.C.1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

................................ ........................ 22

I.C.2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

................................ ............................. 23

I.C.3. Foreign Governments

................................ ................................ ................ 23

II. The Biology of Corn

................................ ................................ ............................ 25

II.A. OECD Consensus Document on the Biology of Zea mays subsp . mays

....................... 25

II.B. Characteristics of the Recipient Germplasm

................................ ........................... 25

III. Transformation and Development of Event 5307 Corn

................................ ....... 26

III.A. Description of the Transformation System

................................ ............................ 26

III.B. Development of Event 5307 Corn

................................ ................................ ........ 27

III.C. Production of Test and Control Materials

................................ .............................. 29

III.D. Quality Control Testing of Seed Ma terials

................................ ............................. 32

IV. Donor Genes and Regulatory Sequences

................................ ............................ 33

V. Genetic Characterization of Event 5307 Corn

................................ ..................... 38

V.A. Nucleotide Sequence of the T

- DNA Insert

................................ .............................. 38

V.B. Copy Number of Functional Elements

................................ ................................ .... 38

V.B.1. Copy Number of Functional Elements: ecry3.1Ab Gene

................................ 40

V.B.2. Copy Number of Functional Elements: CMP promoter

................................ .. 44
V.B.3. Copy Number of Functional Elements: pmi Gene

................................ ......... 47
V.B.4. Copy Number of Functional Elements: ZmUbiInt promoter

........................... 50

V.B.5. Copy Number of Functional Elements: NOS terminator

................................ 55

V.C. Absence of Plasmid Backbone Elem ents

................................ ................................ . 58

V.D. Genetic Stability of 5307 Corn Over Four Generations

................................ ............. 61

V.D.1. Stability of the T

- DNA Using a Full

- Length T

- DNA

- specific Probe

.................... 61

V.D.2. Confirmation of Absence of Plasmid Backbone DNA Using a Backbone

- Specific

... Probe

................... ................................ ................................ ...................... 69

V.E. Mendelian Inheritance of the T

- DNA Insert

................................ ............................. 735307

- USDA

- 1 Page 8 of 211 V.F. Flanking Sequence Analysis to Determine if T

- DNA Inserted into a Known Corn Gene

.. 74

V.G. Analysis of Putative Open Reading Frames Spanning the Genome to Insert Junction

... 76

V.H. Summary of the Genetic Characterization of Event 5307 Corn

................................ .. 76

VI. Characterization of the eCry3.1Ab and PMI Proteins

................................ .......... 78

VI.A. eCry3.1Ab

– Origin, Mode of Action, and Insecticidal Specificity

............................... 78

VI.A.1. Characterization of eCry3.1Ab

................................ ................................ .. 79

VI.A.1.a. Production of eCry3.1Ab for Safety Test ing

................................ ........ 79

VI.A.1.b. Equivalence of eCry3.1Ab in Test Substance and in 5307 Plants

........... 80

VI.A.2. Safety Assessment for eCry3.1Ab

................................ ............................. 81

VI.B. Phosphomannose Isomerase

– Origin and Function

................................ ................ 83

VI.B.1. Mechanism of Action

................................ ................................ ............... 83

VI.B.2. Characterization of Phosphomannose Isomerase

................................ ........ 83

VI.B.1.a. Production of PMI for Safety Testing

................................ ................. 83

VI.B.1.b. Equivalence of PMI in Test Substance and in 5307 Plants

.................... 84

VI.B.3. Safety Assessment for Phosphomannos e Isomerase

................................ .... 84

VI.C. eCry3.1Ab and PMI Concentrations in 5307 Corn

................................ ................... 86

VII. Phenotypic and Compositional Evaluation

................................ .......................... 90

VII.A. Phenotypic Assessment of 5307 Plants

................................ ................................ 90

VII.A.1. Seed Dormancy and Germination

................................ ............................ 92

VII.A.2. Field Agronomic Performance

................................ ................................ .. 96

VII.A.3. Plant Disease Trials

................................ ................................ .............. 102

VII.A.4. General Observations from Field Trials

................................ .................... 102

VII.A.5. Pollen Viability and Morphology

................................ .............................. 103

VII.A.6. Seed Dispersal

................................ ................................ ..................... 105

VII.B. Compositional Assessment of 5307 Forage and Grain

................................ ........... 105

VII.B.1. Design and methods used in compositional analysis study

......................... 105

VII.B.1.a. Statistical analysis for across

- location comparisons

.......................... 106

VII.B.1.b. Statistical analysis for individual

- location comparisons

...................... 106

VII.B.1.c. Comparison with ILSI Crop Composition Database

............................ 106

VII.B.2. Results of statistic al analysis for forage

................................ ................... 107

VII.B.3. Results of statistical analysis for grain

................................ ..................... 108

VII.B.4. Conclusion of compositional analyses

................................ ...................... 108

VII.C. Summary of Phenotypic and Compositional Evaluations

................................ ........ 127

VIII. Environmental Consequences of Introduction

................................ ............... 128

VIII.A. Spectrum of eCry3.1Ab Insecticidal Activity

................................ ....................... 128

VIII.B. Activity of eCry3.1Ab and 5307 Corn Against Target Insects

................................ 131

VIII.C. Estimated Environmental Conce ntrations of eCry3.1Ab

................................ ....... 134

VIII.C.1. Concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 Corn

................................ ............. 134

VIII.C.2. Fate of eCry3.1Ab in Soil

................................ ................................ ...... 135

VIII.C.3. Expected eCry3.1Ab Environmental Concentrations for Nontarget Organisms

................................ ................................ ..................... 135

VIII.C.3.a. EEC for Wild Birds

................................ ................................ ....... 1355307

- USDA

- 1 Page 9 of 211 VIII.C.3.b. EEC for Wild Mammals

................................ ................................ . 136

VIII.C.3.c. EEC for Pollinators

................................ ................................ ....... 137

VIII.C.3.d. EEC for Above

- Ground Nontarget Arthropods

................................ . 137

VIII.C.3.e. EEC for Soil

- Dwelling Nontarget Invertebrates

................................ 138

VIII.C.3.f. EEC for Aquatic Organisms

................................ ........................... 139

VIII.C.3.g. EEC for Farmed Fish

................................ ................................ .... 140

VIII.C.3.h. Summary of Environmental Exposure Estimates

............................. 140

VIII.D. Impact on Nontarget Organisms

................................ ................................ ...... 141

VIII.D.1. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Wild Birds

................................ .......................... 142

VIII.D.1.a Effect of eCry3.1Ab on bobwhite quail

................................ ............ 142

VIII.D.1.b Effect of eCry3.1Ab on broiler chickens

................................ ........... 142

VIII.D.2. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Wild Mammals

................................ ................... 143

VIII.D.3. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Pollinators

................................ ......................... 143

VIII.D.4. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Above

- ground Arthropods

................................ .... 145

VIII.D.4.a. Ladybeetles

................................ ................................ ............... 145

VIII.D.4.b. Flower bugs

................................ ................................ ............... 146
VIII.D.5. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Soil

- dwelling Invertebrates

................................ .. 146

VIII.D.5.a. Carabid beetles

................................ ................................ .......... 146

VI II.D.5.b. Rove beetles

................................ ................................ .............. 147

VIII.D.5.c. Earthworms

................................ ................................ ............... 147
VIII.D.6. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Aquatic Organisms

................................ ............. 1 48

VIII.D.6.a. Freshwater shrimp

................................ ................................ ...... 148

VIII.D.6.b. Channel catfish

................................ ................................ ........... 148

VIII.E. Toxicity Exposure Ratios for Nontarget Organisms

................................ .............. 149

VIII.F. Safety Assessment for Endangered and Threatened Species

............................... 150

VIII.G. Conclusion of Low Environmental Risk

................................ .............................. 151

VIII.H. Gene Flow Assessment

................................ ................................ ................... 152

VIII.I. Gene Flow to Wild Species

................................ ................................ ............... 152

VIII.J. Potential for Horizontal Gene Transfer

................................ .............................. 153

IX. Insect Resistance Management

................................ ................................ ........ 154

X. Adverse Consequences of Introduction

................................ ............................ 156

XI. References

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 157

Acknowledgemen ts

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 169

Appendix A. USDA Notifications for Field Trials with Event 5307 Corn

.................... 170

Appendix B. Materials and Methods Used in the Genetic Characterization of

Event 5307 Corn

................................ ................................ .............................. 171

B.1. Plant Material

................................ ................................ ................................ .. 171

B.2. Real

- Time PCR Analysis

................................ ................................ ..................... 171

B.3. Genomic DNA Extraction

................................ ................................ ................... 172

B.4. DNA Quantitation

................................ ................................ ............................. 173

B.5. Nucleotide Sequence of the T

- DNA Inser t

................................ ............................ 1735307

- USDA

- 1 Page 10 of 211 B.6. Southern Blot Analyses

................................ ................................ ..................... 174

B.7. Nucleotide Sequencing of T

- DNA Flanking Regions in Corn Genome

........................ 176

B.8. Flanking Sequence Analysis to Determine if T

- DNA Inserted into a Known Corn

Gene

................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 177

B.9. Amino Acid Sequence Comparison of Query Peptide to Known or Putative Toxins

..... 177

B.10. Amino A cid Sequence Comparison of Query Peptide to Known or Putative Allergens

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 178

Appendix C. Materials, Methods and Results of Charact erization Studies on the eCry3.1Ab and PMI Proteins

................................ ................................ ............ 180

C.1. Materials and Methods for Comparison of eCry3.1Ab Produced in 5307 Corn Plants

and Recombinant E. coli

................................ ................................ ..................... 180

Event 5307 Corn Leaf Tis sue and Negative Control Corn Leaf Tissue

........................ 180

Extracts of 5307 Corn and Control Corn Leaf Tissue for Western Blot Analysis

.......... 180

Extracts of 5307 Corn and Control Corn Leaf Tissue for Insect Bioassays

.................. 180

Immunoaffinity

- Purified Plant

- Produced Protein

................................ .................... 181

Microbially Produced Test Substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208

................................ ........... 182

eCry3.1Ab Quantification

................................ ................................ .................... 182

Total Protein Determination

................................ ................................ ................ 182

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination

................................ .......... 182

Insecticidal Activity

................................ ................................ ..................... 183

Glycosylation Analysis

................................ ................................ ..................... 183

Peptide Mass Mapping Analysis

................................ ................................ ........... 184

N

- Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

................................ ........................... 184

Statistical Methods

................................ ................................ ..................... 184

C.2. Results of Comparison of eCry3.1Ab Produced in 5307 Corn Plants and

Recombinant E. coli

................................ ................................ ........................... 185

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight

................................ ............................... 185

Insecticidal Activity

................................ ................................ ..................... 186

Glycosyl ation Analysis

................................ ................................ ..................... 186

Peptide Mass Mapping

................................ ................................ ..................... 188

N

- Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

................................ ........................... 189

C.3. Materials and Methods for Comparison of PMI Produced in 5307 Corn Plants and

Recombinant E. coli

................................ ................................ ........................... 190

Event 5307 Corn Leaf Tissue and Negative Control Corn Leaf Tissue

........................ 190

Extracts of 5307 and Control Corn Leaf Tissue

................................ ...................... 190

Extract of Control Leaf Tissue Fortified with Test Substance PMI

- 0105

..................... 190

PMI Protein Quantification

................................ ................................ .................. 190

Total Protein Determination

................................ ................................ ................ 191

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination

................................ .......... 191

Enzymatic Activity

......... ................................ ................................ ..................... 192

C.4. R esults of Comparison of PMI Produced in 5307 Corn and Recombinant E. coli

.......... 193

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination

................................ .......... 1935307

- USDA

- 1 Page 11 of 211 Appendix D. Quantification of eCry3.1Ab and PMI in 5307 Corn

.............................. 196

D.1. Plant Tissue Production

................................ ................................ ...................... 196

D. 2. Plant Tissue Processing

................................ ................................ ...................... 196

D.3. Tissue Extraction and Analysis

................................ ................................ ............. 196

D.4. eCry3.1Ab Quantification

– Extraction and ELISA Procedures

................................ .. 196

D.5. PMI Quantification

– Extraction and ELISA Procedures

................................ ............. 198

Appendix E. Compositional Analysis of 5307 Forage and Grain

............................... 2005307

- USDA

- 1 Page 12 of 211 

### List of Tables

Page

Table III

- 1. Event 5307 and control seed materials used in studies described in this

Petition.

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 30

Ta ble IV

- 1. Description of genetic elements in vector pSYN12274.

................................ ... 34

Table V

- 1. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using an ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Kpn I,

Nco I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ............ 43

Table V

- 2. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using a CMP promoter

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Kpn I, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ .... 47

Table V

- 3. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using a pmi

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I,

and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ..................... 50

Table V

- 4. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using a ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe and restriction

enz ymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ..................... 53

Table V

- 5. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

530 7 corn, using a NOS terminator

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Kpn I, Nco I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ .... 58

Table V

- 6. Expected and obse rved hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using a plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ .... 61

Table V

- 7. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn, using a full length T

- DNA

- specific probe and restriction enz ymes
Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ .. 66

Table V

- 8. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

530 7 corn, using a plasmid backbone

- specific probe and restriction enzymes

Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ .. 72

Table V

- 9. Observed vers us expected frequencies for ecry3.1Ab across generations.

......... 73

Table V

- 10. Observed versus expected frequencies for pmi across generations.

.................. 74

Table VI

- 1. Comparison of Colorado potato beetle larvae LC 50 values for eCry3.1Ab from 5307 plants and test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.

................................ . 81

Table VI

- 2. Mean tissue concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 plants.

................................ 88

Table VI

- 3. Mean tissue concentrations of PMI in 5307 plants.

................................ ......... 89

Table VII

- 1. Phenotypic characteristics evaluated for 5307 cor n hybrids.

............................ 90

Table VII

- 2. Event 5307, control, and reference seed varieties used in seed germination and dormancy tests.

................................ ................................ .................. 92

Table VII

- 3. Summary of 5307 corn seed germination and dormancy frequencies at nonoptimal temperatures.

................................ ................................ .......... 94

Table VII

- 4. Summary of 5307 corn seed germination and dormancy frequencies at optimal temperatures.

................................ ................................ ................ 95

Table VII

- 5. Event 5307 and control hybrids evaluated for agronomic performance.

............ 97

Table VII

- 6. Locations and dates of agronomic performance trials (2007

– 2008).

............... 97

Table VII

- 7. 2007 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates subjected to statistical comparisons.

................................ ................................ ............ 100

Table VII

- 8. 2007 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates not subjected to formal statistical comparisons.

................................ .............................. 100

Table VII

- 9. 2008 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates subjected to statistical comparisons.

................................ ................................ ............ 1015307

- USDA

- 1 Page 13 of 211 Table VII

- 10. 2008 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates not subjected to formal statistical analysis.

................................ ................................ ..... 101

Table VII

- 11. Plant Disease Ratings in Field Trials

................................ ........................... 102

Table VII

- 12. Pollen viability and diameter measurement s

. ................................ .............. 103

Table VII

- 13. Forage and grain components measured in 5307 and conventional corn.

........ 107

Table VII

- 14. Proximate composition of forage from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

...... 109

Table VII

- 15. Calcium and phosphorus composition of forage from 5307 cornand nontransgenic corn.

................................ ................................ ................. 11 1

Table VII

- 16. Pro ximate and starch composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

................................ ................................ ................. 113

Table VII

- 17. Mineral composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

............ 115

T able VII

- 18. Vitamin composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

........... 117

Table VII

- 19. Amino acid composition of grain from corn 5307 corn and nontransgenic

corn.

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 119

Table VII

- 20. Fatty acid composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

........ 123

Table VII

- 21. Secondary metabolite and antinutrient composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn.

................................ ................................ ........... 125

Table VIII

- 1. Insect species screened for sensitivity to eCry3.1Ab.

................................ ... 129

Table VIII

- 2

. Bioassays of coleopteran and lepidopteran pest larvae with eCry3.1Ab

. .......... 130

Table VIII

- 3

. Bioassays of l epidopteran p est l arvae with l eaf p ieces from 5307 c orn.

.......... 131

Table VIII

- 4

. Tissue concentrations of eCry3.1Ab used for computation of EECs.

................ 134

Table VIII

- 5

. Tabulation of EEC and DDD values for nontarget organisms.

......................... 141

Table VIII

- 6

. Source of eCry3.1Ab used to assess the hazard to NTOs.

............................. 142

Table VIII

- 7 Nontarget organism TER values for eCry3.1Ab.

................................ ........... 150

Table VIII

- 8

. Threatened or endangered Coleoptera listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 151

Table A

- 1. List of USDA

- APHIS field release permits and notifications under which plantings of Event 5307 corn have occurred.

................................ ............... 170

Table B

- 1. Real

- time PCR primers and probes used for the detection of ecry3.1Ab, pmi,

and adh1

................................ ................................ ................................ 172

Table B

- 2. Primers used to amplify the insert of 5307 corn

................................ ........... 173

Table B

- 3. Cycling parameters for PCR amplification of insert Fragment 1

...................... 174

Table B

- 4. Cycling parameters for PCR amplification of insert Fragment 2

...................... 174

Table B

- 5. Primers used to amplify the flanking regions of 5307 DNA inse rt

................... 176

Table B

- 6. PCR cycling parameters for the flanking regions of 5307 DNA insert

............... 176

Table C

- 1. Enzymatic activity of PMI in 5307 corn leaf extract, control corn leaf extract

fortified with test substance PMI

- 0105, test substance PMI

- 0105, and

control cor n leaf extract.

................................ ................................ .......... 1955307

- USDA

- 1 Page 14 of 211 

### List of Figures

Page

Figure III

- 1. Plasmid map for vector pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 27

Figure III

- 2. Steps in the development of 5307 corn.

................................ ....................... 28

Figure III

- 3. Pedigree diagram of Event 5307 and control seed materials

............................ 31

Figure IV

- 1. A. Schematic illustrating the origin of the amino acid residues present in eCry3.1Ab.

B. Nucleotide alignment between ecry3.1Ab and mcry3A and corresponding amino acids present at the N

- termini o f eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A.

..................... 37

Figure V

- 1. Map of plasmid pSYN12274 indicating the restriction sites used in the Southern blot analys es (shown in bold type).

................................ ................ 40

Figure V

- 2. Location of the Kpn I, Nco I , Sma I , and Pme I restriction sites and position of

the 1962

- bp ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 41

Figure V

- 3. Southern blot analysis of 53 07 corn for copy number of functional elements:

1962

- bp ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I , Nco I

, and Sma I + Pme I

................................ ................................ ...................... 42

Figure V

- 4. Location of the Kpn I, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position of

the 346

- bp CMP promoter

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 44

Figure V

- 5. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of functional elements:

346

- bp CMP promoter

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I, Spe I,

and Sma I + Pme I

................................ ................................ ...................... 46

Figure V

- 6. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 1176

- bp pmi

- specific probe in t he T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ................................ .................. 48

Figure V

- 7. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of fun ctional elements:

1176

- bp pmi

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and

Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ........................... 49

Figure V

- 8. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 1993

- bp ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 51

Figure V

- 9. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of functional elements:

1993

- bp ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes

Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ .. 52

Figure V

- 10. Location of t he Kpn I, Nco I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position of

the 253

- bp NOS terminator

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 55

Figure V

- 11. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of functional elements:

253

- bp NOS terminator

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I,

Nco I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ............ 57

Figure V

- 12. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe in the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ................................ .................. 59

Figure V

- 13

. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of functional elements:

5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ............ 60

Figure V

- 14. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 6423

- bp full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

................................ ............................ 635307

- USDA

- 1 Page 15 of 211 Figure V

- 15. Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the 6423

- bp full

length T

- DNA

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and

Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ........................... 64

Figure V

- 16. Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the 5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I,

and Sma I + Pme I.

................................ ................................ ..................... 70

Figure VII

- 1. Photographs of stained pollen collected from control and 5307 plants.

........... 104

Figure VIII

- 1. Root mass of a 5307 hybrid compared to a control hybrid under high western corn rootworm pressure.

................................ .............................. 132

Figure VIII

- 2. Rootworm e fficacy of 5307, MIR604 x 5307, and MIR604 corn hybrids;
Illinois and Minnesota trials, 2005

- 2009.

................................ .................... 133

Figure B

- 1. Locations of real

- time PCR primers and probes in the plasmid pSYN12274 T

DNA

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 172

Figure B

- 2

. Map of the 5307 corn insert and location of PCR

- amplified fragments from 5307 corn to determine insert sequence

................................ ..................... 173

Figure C

- 3. Predicted amino acid sequence of eCry3.1Ab and sequence identified by peptide mass mapping analysis of eCry3.1Ab from immuno purified p lant

produced sample IAP5307.

................................ ................................ ....... 188

Figure C

- 4. Predicted amino acid sequence of eCry3.1Ab and sequence identified by peptide mass mapping analysis of eCry3.1Ab from microbially produced test

substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.

................................ ................................ ..... 188

Figure C

- 5. Western blot analysis for PMI in LP5307, LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105, test

substance PMI

- 0105, and LP

- NEG.

................................ ............................. 1945307

- USDA

- 1 Page 16 of 211 

### Abbreviations and Acronyms



### 5307 Event 5307; derived from corn transformation event 5307

ADF a cid detergent fiber

AEBSF 4

- (2

- aminoethyl)

- benzenesulfonylfluoride HCl

AOAC Association of Analytical Communities

AOSA Association of Seed Analysts

APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

ATG translation start codon consisting of adenine, thymine, and guanine

BC b ackcross

BCA bicinchoninic acid

BCW black cutworm ( Agrotis ipsilon )

BCIP/NBT 5

- bromo

- 4

- chloro

- 3

- indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium bp b ase pair

BME beta

- mercaptoethanol

BSA bovine serum albumin

Bt Bacillus thuringiensis

bw body weight

Bt11 transformation event designation for lepidopteran

- resistant corn producing a Cry1Ab protein

CEW corn earworm ( Helicoverpa zea)

CFR U.S. Code of Federal Regulations

cm centimeter

CMP cestrum yellow leaf curling virus promoter

CmYLCV cestrum yellow leaf curling virus

CPB Colorado potato beetle ( Leptinotarsa decemlineata ) Cry c rystal protein from B. thuringiensis

CTAB c etyl t rimethyl a mmonium b romide

Da daltons

dCTP d eoxycytidine triphosphate

DDD d aily dietary dose

DNA deoxyribonucleic acid

dsDNA double

- stranded deoxyribonucleic acid

DTT dithiothreitol

dw dry weight

ECB European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis )

EDTA ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

EEC estimated environmental concentration

ELISA e nzyme

- linked immunosorbent assay

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

F first generation of progeny from a breeding cross

1 

### Fig. figure

FARRP Food Allergy Research and Resource Program

FAW fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda )5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 17 of 211 

### FDA United States Food and Drug Administration

FFDCA Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act

FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act

fw fresh weight

G6PDH glucose 6

- phosphate dehydrogenase

GA21 transformation event designation for glyphosate

- tolerant corn producing

a double mutated 5

- enolpyruvyl shikimate

- 3

- phosphate synthase

enzyme ha hectare IgG immunoglobulin G

ILSI International Life Sciences Institute

IRM insect resistance management

kb kilobase

kilodaltons kDa

LB left border

LC m edian lethal concentration 50 

### LOD l imit of detection LOQ l imit of quantification

LTR long terminal repeat

m meter(s)

MES 2

- (N

- morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid

MIR162 transformation event designation for insect resistant corn producing a Vip3Aa20 protein for lepidopteran control

MIR604 transformation event designation for insect resistant corn producing a modified Cry3A protein for corn rootworm control

MW m olecular weight

N n umber of samples

N/A not a nalyzed

NADP β

- nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NADPH β

- nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced

NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information

NDF n eutral detergent fiber

No. number

NO A EC no

- observable

- adverse

- effect concentration

NO A EL no

- observable

- adverse

- effect level

NOS nopaline synthase

OD o ptical density

OECD Organisation for Economic Co

- operation and Development

ORF open reading frame

PBS p hosphate buffered saline

PBW pink bollworm ( Pectinophora gossypiella )

PCR p olymerase chain reaction

PMI p hosphomannose isomerase

Prob. probability

PVDF p olyvinylidene difloride5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 18 of 211 

### PVP p olyvinylpyrrolidone

RB r ight border repA pVS1 replication gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

SD standard deviation

SCR southern corn rootworm ( Diabrotica undecimpunctata

howardi )

SDS sodium dodecylsulfate

SDS

- PAGE s odium dodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SEM standard error of the mean

spec s trept omycin adenylyltransferase gene from Escherichia coli

SSC saline

- sodium citrate buffer

TAA translation stop codon consisting of the nucleotides thymine, adenine,

and adenine

TAG translation stop codon consisting of the nucleotides thymine, adenine, and guanine

TC1507 transformation event designation for lepidopteran

- resistant corn producing a Cry1F protein

TDF t otal dietary fiber

T

- DNA t ransf er DNA

, transferred DNA

TER toxicity exposure ratio

TGA translation stop codon consisting of the nucleotides thymine, guanine,

and adenine

TMB tetramethylbenzidine

Tris t ris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane

U.S. United States

U.S.C. United States Code

USDA U nited States Department of Agriculture

vir virulence regulon in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

v/v v olume per volume

WCR western corn rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera virgifera )

w/v w eight per volume

w/w w eight per weight

ZmUbiInt Zea mays ubiquitin promoter with intron5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 19 of 211 

### I. Rationale for Submission of Request for Deregulation



### The introduction of crops improved through modern biotechnology has been the single most important technological innovation brought to U nited S tates (U.S.) agriculture in the past 25 years. Adoption of genetically engineered crops with insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits has increased dramatically since the the first commercial introduction s of transgenic corn , cotton and soybeans in 1996 . Net economic benefits at the farm level have been substantial ( Brookes and Barfoo t, 2006 ; Hutchison et al., 2010 ). Impr oved insect and

weed control have led to increased crop yields

, reductions in conventional pest icide applications , and environmental benefi ts (Brookes and Barfoot, 2010 ). The continued development and introduction of transgenic crop varieties with novel traits will benefit

growers
, consum ers and the environment

.

Corn ( Zea mays L., maize) derived from Syngenta’s t ransformation e vent 5307

, hereafter

referred to as “Event 5307 corn ” or “5307 corn ,” contains a n engineered insecticidal protein

, eCry3.1Ab, that is active on three economically important corn rootworm ( Diabrotica ) species . Event 5307 corn demonstrate s excellent efficacy in contro lling these damaging pests. As future product offerings to U.S. growers, the rootworm

- control trait in 5307 corn will be combined via conventional corn breeding methods with other coleopteran

- control, lepidopteran

- control and herbicide

- tolerance traits in previously deregulated corn cultivars;

5307 corn will not be deployed as a stand

- alone product.

I.A. Basis for the Request for a Determination of Nonregulated Status



### The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U

. S

. Department of Agriculture ( USDA ) has responsibility under the Plant Protection Act (Title IV Public Law

106

- 224, 114 Statute 438, 7 U.S.C. § 7701

- 7772) and the Plant Quarantine Act (7 U.S.C. §

151

- 167) to prohibit or restrict the importation, exportation, and interstate movement of plants, plant products, certain biological control organisms, noxious weeds, and plant pests. APHIS regulations under 7 CFR § 340.1 stipulate that any organism that has been altered or produced through genetic engineering is co nsidered a regulated article if the donor organism, recipient organism, or vector or vector agent belongs to an y genera or taxa designated under §340.2 and meets the definition of a plant pest, or is an unclassified organism and/or an organism whose classi fication is unknown, or any product that contains such an organism, or any other organism or product altered or produced through genetic engi neering that the Administrator determines is a plant pest or has reason to believe is a plant pest. The vector age nt used to produce Event 5307 corn was from the genus Agrobacterium , an organism listed under 7 CFR § 340.2. Additionally, regulatory sequences from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and a plant virus, the cestrum yellow yellow leaf curling virus ( CmYLCV ), were i ntroduced in the production of Event 5307 corn

.

The APH IS regulation 7 CFR § 340.6 provides that any person may petition APHIS seeking

a determination that an article should no longer be regulated. Syngenta herein presents data and justification for a n APHIS determination of nonregulated status for Event 5307 corn based on an absence of plant pest risk

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 20 of 211 

### Although the vector agent, Agrobacterium tumefaciens

, is a plant pathogen, the transformation process that created 5307 corn used a disarmed strain . Fur ther

, no nucleotide

sequences from A

. tumefaciens imparting plant pest properties were transferred to 5307

corn. The A

. tumefaciens sequences transferred to corn in the transformation process consisted of the right border region of T

- DNA from the nopaline Ti plasmid and the NOS terminator sequence from the nopaline synthase gene.

CmYLCV is a double

- stranded DNA plant pararetrovirus belonging to the Caulimoviridae family , and has an extremely narrow host range among the Solana ce ae (Stavolone et al., 2003a)

. Although the CMP (CmYLCV) promoter (Stavolone et al., 2003b) from this virus is present in 5307 corn plants, this regulatory sequence per se does not impart plant pest properties.

I.B. Rationale for Development of Event 5307 Corn



### Corn rootworm larvae feed on the roots of growing corn plants and are widespread and major pests of U.S. corn. Prior to the recent introduction of transgenic corn cultivars for rootworm control, the average economic costs of rootworm damage to the U.S. co rn crop were estimated at $1 billion annually (Metcalf, 1986 ; Chandler, 2003 )

. The damage inflicted by rootworm larv a e can significantly reduce grain yield by interfering with photosynthetic rates, limiting the uptake of water and nutrients, and by increa sing the plant's susceptibility to lodging (Oleson et al., 2005). Lodging (leaning) further reduces the effective grain yield by making the plants more susceptible to breaking, reducing their access to sunlight, and increasing the difficulty with which th e grain can be harvested

e fficiently.

Syngenta scientists (Walters et al., 2010) engineered a novel gene, ec ry3.1Ab

, by combining portions of two existing Cry genes, modified c ry3A ( mcry3A ) and c ry1Ab , each of which is

derived from a native gene of Baci llus thuringiensis , a ubiquitous soil bacterium

. Using the tools of modern biotechnology, the gene ecry3.1Ab was introduced in to a n elite corn cultivar, along with the gene pmi (also known as manA ) from Escherichia coli strain K

- 12,

which encodes a selectable marker. The phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) enzyme encoded by pmi allows transformed cells to survive on mannose as the primary carbon source ( Negrotto et al

. , 2000 ); it serves no agronomic purpose in transformed plants (e.g., it

does not conf er herbicide tolerance).

The eCry3.1Ab protein produced in 5307 corn is highly effective in controlling three of the major rootworm pests of corn in the U.S., specifically : D iabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (western corn rootworm) , D. longicornis barberi Smith and Lawrence (northern corn rootworm)

, and D. virgifera zeae Krysan and Smith (Mexican corn rootworm). Expressing the ecry3.1Ab gene at adequate levels in corn plants is a logical approach for limiting crop losses attributable to these pests , especially considering the limitations of conventional insecticides in controlling corn rootworms

.

In hybrid s offer ed for sale to U.S. growers, the gene ecry3.1Ab in 5307 corn will be combined through traditional breeding with the transgenes of other deregulated corn events containing insect

- protection traits as well as herbicide

- tolerance traits . The hybrid offerings5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 21 of 211 

### currently planned represent breeding “stacks” of events Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21. One of the stack components, Syngenta’s MIR604 corn, also produces a rootworm

- control protein, mCry3A, that is active on the same three rootworm pests targeted by eCry3.1Ab.

The combination of eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A in the same corn hybrid s offers important advantages for insect resistance management. It has been demonstrated that eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A have unique properties that, when combined, will serve to prevent, delay, or mitigate the evolution of target pest resistance to either prot ein. Al though the proteins act by the same general mechanism, i.e., pore formation in the target pest gut, the evidence indicates that they have unique gut binding sites in the target pest, thus effectively representing different modes of action (Walters et al., 2010). The concurrent deployment of both eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A in the same hybrid offerings to growers is expected to help preserve pest susceptibility to both proteins. Additionally, by reducing the selection pressure on target pest populations t o evolve resistance to any single method of rootworm control, this strategy is predicted to help prolong pest susceptibility to other B. thuringiensis

derived proteins in transgenic corn cultivars used for rootworm control

, as well as to other

traditional control methods (e.g., insecticides and crop rotation).

Corn is the most widely cultivated U.S. crop, in terms of acreage planted and net value. Transgenic corn hybrids delivering targeted rootworm control have been availab le in the U.S. since 2003. Prior to their introduction, control of Diabrotica rootworms accounted for the largest single use of conventional insecticides in the U.S

. (Ward et al., 2005). Transgenic corn hybrids have significantly improved grower s ’ abilit y to control these pests effectively and easily , while dramatically reducing the ir use of broad

- spectrum soil

- applied

insecticides for rootworm control. The attendant benefits of the current transgenic h ybrids

on the market include higher and more consist ent grain yield, economic benefits to growers, healthier plants, improved worker safety, and reduced use of fossil fuels to apply insecticide

treatment s . The de ployment of 5307 corn (in hybrid combinations with other agronomically important traits) will o ffer similar benefits as well additional choices in pest control, thus promoting marketplace competition and higher adoption rates, and helping to preserve target pest susceptibility to current rootworm control methods.

I. C

. Regulatory Process



### Syngenta is actively pursuing regulatory approvals fo r 5307 corn cultivation in the U.S. and

Canada , and may seek additional cultivation approvals in the future

. In hybrid offerings to growers, 5307 corn will not be marketed as a stand

- alone product, but will be c ombined via traditional breeding with other approved corn cultivars containing additional insect

protection traits as well as herbicide

- tolerance traits, i.e., as Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 corn hybrids. Syngenta is also actively seeking regulatory approvals of products containing 5307

corn in countries that import corn from the U.S. or Canada and have functioning systems for regulating imports of genetically modified crops

.

Under the Fed eral Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology, commercial biotechnology products like 5307 corn are subject to the regulatory authority of5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 22 of 211 

### multiple federal agencies, whose regulatory processes can operate simultaneously along parallel trac ks. This section describes Syngenta’s plan for obtaining regulatory approval from all of the relevant agencies. This information is intended to assist the agencies in coordinating their efforts where it is appropriate.

Syngenta will not offer hybrids con taining the 5307 transgenes for sale in the U.S. or Canada until the necessary approvals in key export markets with functioning regulatory systems have been granted.

I.C.1. USDA

- APHIS



### Under the Plant Protection Act, APHIS has regulatory oversight over products of modern biotechnology to the extent that they could pose a plant pest risk. Under this system, any plant that has been altered or produced through genetic engineering starts out as a “regulated

article.” APHIS regulates the import, handling, i nterstate movement, and release into the environment of regulated articles, including genetically engineered plants that are undergoing confined experimental use or field trials.

APHIS regulations allow companies like Syngenta to petition the agency for a determination

of non

- regulated status. 7 CFR § 340.6. If APHIS grants that petition, the product of biotechnology at issue will no longer be subject to oversight as a regulated article. To

determine whether non

- regulated status is appropriate, APHIS eva luates a variety of issues including the potential for plant pest risk; disease and pest susceptibilities; the expression of gene products, new enzymes, or changes to plant metabolism; weediness and impact on sexually compatible plants; agricultural or cul tivation practices; effects on non

- target organisms; and the potential for gene transfer to other types of organisms.

This Petition is being submitted in compliance with APHIS regulations as a request for a

determination of non

- regulated status for 5307 co rn. In the near future, Syngenta intends to submit an Environmental Report containing additional information and analysis of potential environmental impacts that is not required by the regulations governing petitions for non

regulated status, but which is intended to assist APHIS in fulfilling its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq ., as well as other applicable statutes and regulations.

I.C. 2

. U.S. E nvironmental P rotection A gency 

### Substances that are pe sticides as defined under the F ederal I nsecticide, F ungicide, and

R odenticide A ct (FIFRA) are subject to regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA )

. The eCry3.1Ab protein encoded by the genetic insert in 5307 corn has insecticidal properties and is, therefore, regulated by EPA. The EPA regulatory process includes issuance of Experimental Use Permits for field testing and “registration” of pesticidal products prior to their sale and distribution. As part of the registration process, EPA may establish conditions on the use of the product. EPA also sets “tolerance limits” for the presence of pesticide residues on and in food and animal feed. In some cases, EPA may establish an exemption from the tolerance limits under the Federal Food, Drug a nd Cosmetic

Act.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 23 of 211 

### Syngenta has obtained an Experimental Use P ermit (67979

- EUP

- 8) from EPA that allow s for broad

- scale field testing of 5307 corn and various breeding sta ck combinations that

include 5307 corn

. T his permit was initially granted on June 1, 20 10 with effect through February 28, 2012 (EPA , 2010 f ) and was extended on March 3, 2011 with effect through December 31, 2013 (EPA, 2011 a)

. In connection with this Experimental Use Permit

, EPA

established and extended a temporary exemption from the requir ement of a tolerance for eCry3.1Ab residues in corn commodities , pursuant to §408(d) of the F ederal F ood, D rug, and C osmetic A ct

, 21 U.S.C. § 346a(d) ( EPA, 2010 a , 2011b )

. Phosphomannose isomerase (PMI), the selectable m arker protein produced by 5307 corn plants, is exempt from food and

feed tolerances (EPA, 20 07 ).

P ursuant to FIFRA §3(c)(5)

, in April 2011 Syngenta submit ted application s to the U

. S

. EPA for registration of the eCry3.1Ab plant

- incorporated protectant in 5307 corn (file symbol

67979

- EE) and in two breeding stacks thereof, specifically Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 corn

. The registration sought for the plant

- incorporated protectant in 5307 corn as a stand

- alone

cultivar will be for a manufacturing

- use product ( 40 CFR § 152.3 ) ; Syngenta will not seek

a n end

- use product registration for 5307 corn, per se . Rather, commercial registrations will be sought for the two breeding stack products, described above, that include 5307 corn.

Conc urrently, Syngenta also submit ted a p etition (Petition No. 1F7857) to the EPA to

establish a nonexpiring e xemption from the requirement of a tolerance for eCry3.1Ab

residues in food and feed commodities

.

I.C. 3

. U.S. F ood and D rug A dministration



### The Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology gives FDA the responsibility to regulate the safety and proper labeling of plant

- derived foods and feeds that are developed using the techniques of modern biotechnology. Under the Federal Food,

Dru g, and Cosmetic Act, food and feed manufacturers must ensure that the products they market are safe and properly labeled. The FDA helps sponsors of foods and feeds derived from genetically engineered crops comply with their obligations by encouraging them to participate in a voluntary consultation process.

Event 5307 corn falls within the scope of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) policy statement concerning regulation of food products derived from new plant varieties, including those developed by rec ombinant DNA techniques (FDA, 1992). Syngenta

initiate d a voluntary pre

- market consultation process with FDA and submit ted a safety and

nutritional assessment for 5307 corn in January 2011 (File BNF 000128)

.

I.C. 4

. Foreign Governments


### Syngenta intends to commercialize 5307 corn , as part of the breeding

- stack combinations

Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 corn
, for cultivation in Canada and will concurrently seek regulatory approvals t o enable this. In April 2011, Syngenta submitted an application to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) for unconfined environmental release of 5307 corn.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 24 of 211 

### Additional applications to Health Canada and CFIA for food and feed use approval

, respectively, of 5307 corn will be submitted in May 2011.

Syngenta is also pursu ing regulatory approvals for importation of corn commodities and processed goods containing 5307 corn in key export markets for U

. S

. and Canadian corn

. Regulatory filings fo r 5307 corn import approvals have been made in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia/New Zealand and the European Union. Applications are currently planned for additional countries including Mexico, Colombia, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, South Afri ca, and Russia.

In June 2010, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan granted Syngenta approval to conduct a local field trial of 5307 corn under isolated conditions as a prerequisite for future cultivation/import approval from an envi ronmental safety perspective. This 5307 corn was successfully harvested in October 2010.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 25 of 211 

### II. The Biology of Corn

II.A

. OECD Consensus Document on the Biology of Zea mays subsp . mays



### The Consensus Document on the Biology of Zea mays subsp . mays (Maize) , published by

the Organisation for Economic Co

- operation and Development (OECD, 2003), provides comprehensive information regarding the biology of corn. This Consensus Document is referenced in support of this Petition, and includes the following information:

**•** Uses of corn as a crop plant

**•** Taxonomic status of the genus Zea

**•** Identification methods among races of Zea mays and wild species

**•** Centers of origin and diversity of corn

**•** Reproductive biology of corn

**•** Intra

- specific and inter

- specific crosses of corn and gene flow

**•** Agro

- ecology of corn, including cultivation, volunteers, weediness, soil ecology and

corn

- insect interactions

**•** Corn biotechnology

**•** Common diseases and insect pests of corn

II.B

. Characteristics of the Reci pient Germplasm



### The recipient ge rmplasm for transformation to produce Event 5307 corn was an elite Syngenta inbred corn line

, NP2 2 22 (Plant Variety Protection certificate 200200071

, issued

November 2004 ; USDA

- AMS, 2010 )

. This inbred line was used be cause it is well

- suited to Agrobacterium transformation and regeneration from tissue culture. NP2222 is a Stiff

- Stalk family, yellow dent inbred.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 26 of 211 

### III. Transformation and Development of Event 5307 Corn

III.A. Description of the Transformation System



### Transformation of Z. mays t o produce 5307 corn was accomplished via Agrobacterium tumefaciens

- mediated transformation ( as described in Negrotto et al

., 2000 ) using immature embryos of Syngenta inbred corn line NP2222

. Agrobacterium

- mediated transformation is

an efficient method for generating transfor mants containing simple and low

- copy

- number insertions with stable inheritance at a high frequency (Grimsley et al., 1987; Ishida et al., 1996)

. Using this method, DNA between the left border (LB) and right border (RB) of a transformation plasmid, referred to as t he transferred DNA (T

- DNA), is efficiently

transferred integr ated into the genome of the plant cell, while genetic elements beyond the plasmid borders are generally not transferred

.

Event 5307 corn transformatio n employed a binary vector sys tem (de Framond et al., 1983). A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 carries a disarmed Ti plasmid from which the native T

- DNA

has be en removed (Ooms et al., 1982). The Ti plasmid carries the vir genes which encode proteins that are required for release of the T

- DNA from the transformation plasmid and its integration into the corn nuclear genome. The transformation plasmid used to create 5307

corn was p SYN12274 (see Figure III

- 1 ).

Immature embryos were excised from 8

- 12 day old corn ears and rinsed with fresh culture medium in preparation for transformation. Embryos were mixed with a suspension of A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring plasmid pSB1 (Komari et al.

, 1996) and the transformation plasmid pSYN12274, vortexed for 30 seconds, and allowed to incubate for

an additional five minutes. Excess A. tumefaciens suspension was aspirated, and embryos

were m oved to plates containing a non selective culture medium. Embryos were co

- cultured with the remaining A. tumefaciens at 22 ° C for two to three days in the dark. Embryos were then transferred to culture medium supplemented with ticarcillin (200 mg/l) and silver nitrate (1.6 mg/l), and incubated in the dark for 10 days. Embryos producing embryogenic

callus were transferred to c ell culture medium containing mannose. The gene pmi was used as a selectable marker during the transformation process (Negrotto et al

. , 2000). It encodes the enzyme phosphomannose isomerase (PMI), which enables transformed cells to survive

on a mannose s ubstrate (Negrotto et al., 2000).

After initial incubation with A. tumefaciens , transformed tissue was transferred to selective media containing 500 mg/l of the broad

- spectrum antibiotic cefotaxime and grown for four months, ensuring that the A. tumefaciens was cleared from the transformed tissue.

Cefotaxime has been shown to kill A. tumefaciens at this concentration (Xing et al

. , 2008). Regenerated plantlets were tested for the presence of both ecry3.1Ab and pmi , and for the absence of the sp ectinomycin ( spec ) resistance gene present on the vector backbone, by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) analysis (Ingham et al

. , 2001). This screen

allows for the selection of transforma nts that carry the T

- DNA and are free of vector

backbone DNA. Plants that tested positive for both ecry3.1Ab and pmi but negative for spec were transferred to a greenhouse for further propagation.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 27 of 211 Figure III

- 1

. Plasmid map f or vector pSYN12274

.

III.B. Development of Event 5307 Corn



### Progeny of the original transformants (T 0 

### plants) were field tested for resistance to insect feeding dam age and for agronomic performance after introgression of the transgenes into multiple elite lines of corn . Event 5307 corn was selected as the lead commercial candidate

and underwent further f ield testing and development

. A schematic showing the ste ps in development of 5307 corn is shown in Figure III

- 2

. All interstate movements and field plantings of 5307 seed were conducted under USDA APHIS notification s ; these are listed in Appendix A. 

## pSYN12274

11769 bp

pmi (1176 bp) spec (789 bp) virG (726 bp) repA (1074 bp) ecry3.1Ab (1962 bp) CMP promoter (346 bp)

VS1 ori (405 bp) ColE1 ori (807 bp)

NOS terminator (253 bp) NOS terminator (253 bp)

LB (25 bp) RB (25 bp)

ZmUbiInt promoter (1993 bp)5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 28 of 211 Figure III

- 2

. Steps in the development of 5307 corn

. 

### Synthetic gene ecry3.1Ab engineered

from parts of mcry3A and cry1Ab

Assembly of ecry3.1Ab and pmi genes and regulatory

elements in plasmid vector p SYN12274 in E. coli

Transformation of elite inbred NP2222 e mbryos with

A

. tumefaciens containing plasmid vector p SYN12274

Selection of transformation events on

culture medium containing mannose

Regeneratio n of transformed

cells into maize plants

Evaluation of transformants for insecticidal efficacy

Introgression of transformation events into elite inbred lines for evaluation of agronomic performance

Selection of Event 5307 maize as

lead candidate for development

Introgression of 5307 transgenes into commercial breeding lines ; field tests Re gulatory studies to assess
human and environmental risks5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 29 of 211 III.C. Production of Test and Control Materials



### Table III

- 1 lists the genotypes and descript ions of the various 5307 corn and nontransgenic control corn seed genotypes used in the studies described within this Petition. The breeding pedigree diagram in Figure III

- 3 indicates how each of the 5307 genotypes was derived via conventional breeding cr osses from the original Event 5307 T 0



### Several Syngenta studies described in this Petition were conducted using 5307 hybrid corn of genotype NP2171 x NP2460(5307), which was hemizygous for the transgenes; a hemizygous genotype is representative of future h ybrids containing the 5307 transgenes that would be grown commercially. This 5307 hybrid is indicated by the letter code “E” in the breeding diagram ( Figure III

- 3), and is alternatively referred to within this Petition as

“NP2171 x BC5F transformant. Figure III

- 3 also indicates the derivation of related control seed materials of genotypes that were near

isogenic to the 5307 hybrid seed genotypes. Seed genotypes used in studies described

herein are i dentified in the pedigree diagram by a single letter code (A through J ); these correspond to seed lot identifiers in Table III

- 1. In Figure III

- 3, genotypes enclosed in ovals represent transgenic 5307 corn genotypes that were used in studies described her ein; genotypes enclosed in rectangles represent nontransgenic, near

- isogenic control genotypes. The goal in producing all control hybrids was to match their genetic background with that of the 5307 hybrids so that the effect of the transformation event co uld be assessed in an

unbiased manner.

3. 

### ” As indicated i n Figure III

- 3, it was produced by crossing a nontransgenic inbred parent, NP2171, with the F 3 

### (third generation) transgenic progeny of

self

- pollinated plants following five successive generations of backcross (BC) breeding of the transgenes into to a recurrent NP2460 inbred. This backcross process fully introgressed the transgenes from the initia l transformed germplasm (inbred line NP2222) into NP2460 germplasm. The corresponding nontransgenic control seed material was produced by crossing nontransgenic inbreds NP2171 and NP2 4 60. Except for the presence of the transgenes, control hybrid NP2171 × NP2460 is nearly genetically identical to the corresponding transgenic hybrid; thus, this control is considered near

- isogenic to the NP2171 × NP2460(5307) hybrid. The NP2171 × NP2460 seed material (indicated by the letter code “F” in Figure III

- 3) served as a control for two NP2171 x NP2460(5307) hybrids, one created using the 5307 BC5F 3 

### generation (letter code “E”) and one created using the preceding 5307 generation, BC5F 2



### The NP2391 × NP2222 control hybrid seed material (letter code “H” in Figure III

- 3), which corresponds to the transgenic hybrid seed genotype NP2391 × NP2222(5307) (letter code G), was not produced by direct crossing of the nontransgenic inbreds NP2391 × NP2222. Rather, it was derived from the null segregants of the hemizygous F (letter code “D”).

2 

### progeny of the initial

T 0



### Two genetic characterization studies described in this Petition (genetic stability studies and Mendelian inheritance studies) required seed from multiple generations in the 5307 breeding pedigree, as indicated in Table III

- 1. transformant, that is , those progeny that did not inherit the transgenes from a transgenic parent as a consequence of Mendelian gene segregation. This material is also considered a

suitable nontransgenic control for the corresponding 5307 hybrid material.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 30 of 211 Table III

- 1. Event 5307 and control seed materials used in studies described in this

P etition.

The female parent germplasm is shown first in each hybrid genotype description; the male parent germplasm

is listed second. The pedigree diag ram in Figure VIII

- 3 indicates the origin of E vent 5307 seed and control

seed materials of these genotypes by seed lot identifier (Lot ID)

.

Study Description (Relevant Part of Petition) Event 5307 Seed Material Nontransgenic Control Seed Material

Lot

ID Genotype Lot

ID Genotype

Nucleotide sequence inserted (Part V.A.) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307 )(BC5F 3 )* None

Southern blot s for copy

n o. of functional elements (Part V.B.) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 ) * F NP2171 × NP2460 + parental inbred lines NP2222

, NP2460

, NP2171

Southern blot analysis
of genetic stability (Part V.D.) A
B
C

E F 1 BC6
BC7 NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 ) * F P arental inbred lines NP2222

, NP2460

, and NP2171

NP2171 × NP2460

Mendelian inheritance

a nalysis (Part V.E.) A
B
C F 1 BC6
BC7 None

Determination of insert flanking s equence s (Part V.F., Appendix B) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 ) * None

Equivalence of eCry3.1Ab produced in

5307 corn and
recombinant E

. coli (Part VI. A

. 1.b

. ) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 )* F NP2171 × NP2460

eCry3.1Ab and PMI
concentrations in 5307 corn tissues (Part VI.C.) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 )* F NP2171 × NP2460

Seed germination and dormancy evaluation (Part VII.A.1.) E
G NP2171 × NP2460(5307 ) (BC5F 3 )* NP2391 × NP2222(5307) F
H NP2171 × NP2460
NP 2391 × NP 2222

Field agronomic performance

– 2007 (Part VII.A.2.) D NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 2 ) F NP2171 × NP2460

Field agronomic performance

– 2008 (Part VII.A.2.) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 ) * F NP2171 × NP2460

Plant disease trials (Part VII.A.3) I 5XH751 × NP2222(5307) J 5XH751 × NP2222

Pollen viability and morphology evaluation (Part VII.A. 5 .) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 )* F NP2171 × NP2460

Compositional assessment of forage and grain (Part VII.B.) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 )* F NP2171 × NP2460

Broiler chicken and
catfish feeding studies
with grain (Parts VIII.D.2 & VIII.D.6.b., respectively) E NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 )* F NP2171 × NP2460

* This 5307 hybrid is alternatively referred to within this P etition as “NP2171 x BC5F 3 ” or “NP2171 x NP2 4 60 (5307).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 31 of 211 

### ⊗

× NP2391* **⊗ ⊗**  F2

F3

F4 **⊗** homozygo tes



### ⊗

F5 × NP2391* NP2391 × 

### NP2222(5307) F3

F4 

### ⊗

**⊗**

F5

Nontransgenic Control Hybrid

NP2391 × 

### NP2222 negative segregants

× NP2460 * × NP2460 * 

### × NP2460* × NP2460* NP2222* × 5307

F1

BC1

BC5 × NP2460*

**⊗** × NP2222* 5307 T 0 

### ( NP2222 * )

× NP2460* BC2

BC3

× NP2460*

BC4

BC5F 2



### BC5F 3



### NP2171* × h omozygo tes

NP2171 x NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 

### ) **⊗** homozygo tes 

### BC6 BC7 

## A

B

C G

Non transgenic

Control Hybrid

NP2171 × 

### NP2460 NP2171* × NP2460* × NP2460*

NP2171* × homozygotes



## E D NP2171 x NP2460(5307) (BC5F 2 

### )



## F H F6

F7 F8 x 5XHY751* 5XHY751 × 

### NP2222(5307)

Nontransgenic Control Hybrid

5XHY751 × 

### NP2222



## J 5 X HY751* × NP2222* **⊗**

**⊗**

**⊗**



## I

Figure III

- 3. Pedigree diagram of Event 5307 and control seed materials

Generations in ovals were Event 5307 materials used in studies described in t his P etition . Generations in rectangles were used as controls. B oxed letter code s correspond to specific seed lots used in studies listed in

Table III

- 1. A backcross (BC) is a cross of an individual with one of its parents. The initial Event 5307 F 1 generation was crossed with one of its inbred parents, NP2460, to create generation BC1. Likewi se, BC2 originated from a cross of the BC1 with the parental line NP2460. Successive backcross es with the recurrent parent followed similarly to introgress the transgenes into NP2460 germplasm

. T 0 = original transformant

x = cross

BC = backcross

**⊗** = self

- pollination

* = field corn inbred5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 32 of 211 III.D. Quality Control Testing of Seed Materials



### All test a nd control seed lots were analyzed for the presence of Event 5307 DNA and

adventitious DNA from other transformation events using the real

- time PCR method

described in Appendix B. All Event 5307 seed lots were confirmed to contain the genes ecry3.1Ab and pmi based on nucleotide sequence . Additionally, all Event 5307 seed lots

were confirmed to contain Event

- 5307

- specific DNA based on nucleotide sequences at the junction of the T

- DNA insert and the corn genome. The analyses did not detect these
components in control seed lots. All test and control seed lots had no detectable sequences

that would be indicative of DNA from other regulated events under development at Syngenta, or deregulated events for which testing methodology is available.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 33 of 211 

### IV. Donor Genes and Regulatory Sequences



### Event 5307 corn was produced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

- mediated transformation of

immature corn embryos using the transformation plasmid vector pSYN12274. The DNA region between the left and right borders of the transform ation plasmid included gene expression cassettes for ecry3.1Ab and pmi (also known as manA ) ; this T

- DNA was

transferred into the corn genome during transformation. The ecry3.1Ab expression cassette

consisted of the ecry3.1Ab coding region regulated by a c estrum yellow leaf curling virus promoter (CMP) and a nopaline synthase (NOS) polyadenylation (terminator) sequence.

The pmi expression cassette consisted of the pmi coding region regulated by a Zea mays polyubiquitin (ZmUbiInt) promoter and the NOS termi nator sequence. A schematic of the plasmid vector is shown in F igure III

- 1 . The size and description of each genetic element in

the vector are shown in Table IV

- 1 below

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 34 of 211 Table IV

- 1 . Description of genetic elements in vector pSYN12274.

Genetic
element Size (bp) Position Description

Active ingredient cassette

Intervening

sequence 203 26 to 228 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

CMP promoter 346 229 to 574 Cestrum Yellow Leaf Curling Virus promoter region (Hohn et al., 2007; Stavolone et al., 2003 b ). Provides constitutive expression in

corn

.
Intervening

sequence 9 575 to 583 Noncoding ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

ecry3.1Ab 1962 584 to 2545 An engineered Cry gene active against certain corn rootworm ( Diabrotica ) species (Entrez® Accession No. GU327680 [NCBI, 2010a]). The gene ecry3.1Ab (Walters et al., 2010) consists of a
fusion between the 5 ′ end (Domain I, Domain II and 15 amino acids of
Doma in III) of a modified Cry3A gene ( mcry3A ) and the 3 ′ end (Domain III and Variable Region 6 [H ö fte and Whiteley, 1989]) of a synthetic Cry1Ab gene ( see descriptions of mcry3A and cry1Ab and Figure IV

- 1 below). Upstream of the mcry3A domain, the gene ecry3.1Ab carries a 67

- bp

- long oligomer extension at its 5 ′ end, which was introduced during the engineering of the variable regions and is translated into the following 22 amino acid residues: MTSNGRQCAGIRPYDGRQQHRG. The next 459 amino acid
residues are identical to a portion of mCry3A, followed by 172 residues that are identical to a portion of Cry1Ab. Figure IV

- 1 illustrates the origins of the corresponding amino acid sequences in eCry3.1Ab.

Description of mcry3A : a corn

- optimized cry3A was synthesized to accommodate the preferred codon usage for corn (Murray et al., 1989). The synthetic sequence was based on the native Cry3A protein sequence from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp . tenebrionis (Sekar et al., 1987). The corn

- optimized gene w as then modified to incorporate a consensus cathepsin

- G protease recognition site within the expressed protein. The amino acid sequence of the encoded mCry3A corresponds to that of the native Cry3A, except that (1) its N

terminus corresponds to methionine 48 of the native protein and (2) a cathepsin G protease recognition site has been introduced, beginning at amino acid residue 155 of the native protein. This cathepsin

- G recognition site has the sequence alanine

- alanine

- proline

phenylalanine, and has rep laced the amino acids valine

- 155, serine

156, and serine

- 157 in the native protein (Chen and Stacy, 2003).

Description of cry1Ab : The gene cry1Ab was originally cloned from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp . kurstaki strain HD

- 1 (Geiser et al., 1986). Its sequence was codon

- optimized (Koziel et al., 1997) to accommodate the preferred codon usage for corn (Murray et al., 1989).

Intervening

sequence 30 2546 to 2575 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

NOS 253 2576 to 2828 Terminator sequence from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Entrez Accession Number V00087 [NCBI, 2010a ]). This sequence provides a polyadenylation site (Depicker et al., 1982).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 35 of 211 Table IV

- 1 ( Continued ) . Description of genetic elements in vector pSYN12274

Genetic
element Size (bp) Position Description

Selectable marker cassette

Intervening

sequence 25 2829 to 2853 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

ZmUbiInt promoter 1993 2854 to 4846 Promoter region from the maize polyubiquitin gene which contains the first intron (Entrez® Accession Number S94464 [NCBI, 2010a]).

Provides constitutive expression in monocots (Christensen et al., 1992)

Intervening

sequence 12 4847 to 4858 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

pmi 1176 4859 to 6034 Escherichia coli strain K

- 12 gene pmi encoding the enzyme phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) (Entrez Accession Number M15380 [NCBI, 2010a]); this gene is also known as manA

. Catalyzes the isomerization of mannose

- 6

- phosphate to fructose

- 6

- phosphate (Negrotto et al., 2000).

Intervening

sequence 60 6035 to 6094 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

NOS 253 6095 to 6347 Terminator sequence from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Entrez Accession Number V00087 [NCBI, 2010a]). This sequence provides a polyadenylation site (Depicker et al., 1982).

Intervening

sequence 88 6348 to 6435 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

Plasmid backbone

Left border (LB) 25 6436 to 6460 Left border region of T

- DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline Ti

- plasmid (Entrez® Accession Number J01825 [NCBI, 2010a]). Short direct repeat sequence that flanks the T

- DNA and is required for the transfer of the T

- DNA in to the plant cell (Zambryski et al., 1982)

Intervening

sequence 349 6461 to 6809 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

spec 789 6810 to 7598 Streptomycin adenylyltransferase gene, aadA , from Escherichia coli transposon Tn7 (similar to Entrez® Accession Number X03043 [NCBI, 2010a]). Confers resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin and is used as a bacterial selectable marker (Fling et al., 1985)

Intervening

sequence 299 7599 to 7897 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

virG 726 7898 to 8623 The VirGN54D gene ( virG ) from pAD1289 (similar to Entrez® Accession Number AF242881 [NCBI, 2010a). The N54D substitution

results in a constitutive virG phenotype. VirG is part of the two

component regulatory system for the virulence ( vir ) regulon in Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Hansen et al., 1994).

Intervening

sequence 29 8624 to 8652 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 36 of 211 Table IV

- 1 ( Continued ) . Description of genetic elements in vector pSYN12274

Genetic
element Size (bp) Position Description

Plasmid backbone ( **continued** )

repA 1074 8653 to 9726 Gene encoding the pVS1 replication protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (similar to Entrez® Accession Number AF133831 [NCBI, 2010a]), which is a part of the minimal pVS1 replicon that is
functional in Gram

- negative, plant

- associated bacteria (Heeb et al., 2000)

Intervening

sequence 42 9727 to 9768 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

VS1 ori 405 9769 to 10173 Consensus sequence for the origin of replication and partitioning region from plasmid pVS1 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Entrez® Accession Number U10487 [NCBI 2010a]). Serves as origin of replication in Agrobacterium tumefaciens host (Itoh et al., 1984)

Intervening

sequence 677 10174 to
10850 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

ColE1 ori 807 10851 to
11657 Origin of replication (similar to Entrez® Accession Number V00268 [NCBI 2010a]) that permits replication of plasmids in Escherichia coli (Itoh and Tomizawa, 1979)

Intervening

sequence 112 11658 to

11769 Noncoding i ntervening sequence with restriction sites used for cloning

Right border (RB) 25 1 to 25 Right border region of T

- DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline Ti

- plasmid (Entrez® Accession Number J01826 [NCBI 2010a]). Short direct repeat that flanks the T

- DNA and is required
for the transfer of the T

- DNA into the plant cell (Wang et al ., 1984)5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 37 of 211 A

.

B

.

ecry3.1Ab ATG ACT AGT AAC GGC CGC CAG TGT GCT GGT ATT CGC CCT T AT GAC GGC CG A eCry3.1Ab M T S N G R Q C A G I R P Y D G R

mcry3A

............................................ ......... ATG ACG GCC G AC
mCry3A M T A D

ecry3.1Ab CAA CAA CAC CGA GGC C

- TG GAC AGC AGC ACC ACC AAG GAC GTG
eCry3.1Ab Q Q H R G L D S S T T K D V

mcry3A AAC AAC ACC GAG GCC CTG GAC AGC AGC ACC ACC AAG GAC GTG
mCry3A N N T E A L D S S T T K D V

Figure IV

- 1. A

. Schematic illustrating the origin of the amino acid residues present in eCry3.1Ab. B. Nucleotide alignment between ecry3.1Ab and mcry3A and corresponding amino acids present at the N

- termini of eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A.

(A) The black rectangles represent the variable regions 1 through 6 (V1 through V6) of Cry1Ab; the rectangles with diagonal lines represent the conserved blocks 1 through 5 (CB1 through CB5) of Cry1Ab ; the gray rectangles represent the Cry1Ab tail sequence. The white rectangles represent the variable regions 1 through 5 of mCry3A; the rectangles with crosshatch lines represent the conserved blocks 1 through 5 of mCry3A. T he vertically striped portion of eCry3.1Ab represents the N

- terminal amino

- acids unique to eCry3.1Ab (see Figure

IV

- 1B).

(B) The dotted line symbolizes sequence absent from m Cry3A; the dash indicates a one

- base

- pair deletion in ecry3.1Ab . The first 40 nucleotides of ecry3.1Ab (and the 13 amino acids they encode) are in bold text to highlight their addition during the engineering of the gene. The 9 amino acids LDSSTTKDV shown for both
proteins in bold text indicate where the amino acid s equence of eCry3.1Ab is restored to that of mCry3A. 

## V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6

CB1 CB2 CB3 CB4 CB5 Domain I Domain II Domain III

V1 V2 V3 V4 V5

CB1 CB2 CB3 CB4 CB5

V1 V2 V3 V4 V5

CB1 CB2 CB3 CB4 CB5 

# Cry1Ab

mCry3A

eCry3.1Ab V65307

- USDA

- 1 Page 38 of 211 

### V. Genetic Characterization of Event 5307 Corn



### An extensive genetic characterization of the T

- DNA insert in Event 5307 corn was conducted by Southern blot analyses and nucleotide sequencing. Further, the genetic stability of the insert was assessed both by Southern blot analyses and by examining the inheritance patterns of the transgene s over multiple generations of 5307 plants. Additionally, the corn genomic sequences flanking the Event 5307 insert w ere identified and

characterized. Finally, it was determined that the Event 5307 T

- DNA insertion into the corn genome did not disrupt the function of any known corn gene. T hese data collectively demonstrate that there are no deleterious changes in the 53 07 corn genome as a result of the

T

- DNA insertion.

Descriptions, results and conclusions of each genetic characte rization study are provided in

P arts V.A to V. G. , below. Details of the material s and methods used in these studies are provided in Appendix B. A general summary of the conclusions of these studies is provided

in P art V. H

. , b elow.

V.A

. Nucleotide Sequenc e of the T

- DNA Insert



### Two overlapping DNA fragments that span the 5307 corn insert were amplified from genomic DNA extracted from 5307 corn using a polymerase chain reaction method

. These fragments were cloned, and sequences of the clones were aligned to create a consensus of

the T

- DNA sequence. The consensus nucleotide sequence data for th e 5307 corn insert were compared to the sequence of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274 ( Figure III

- 1 ). The data demonstrated that the insert was intact and that the organization of the functional elements within the insert, as present in plasmid pSYN12274, was maintained. The

functional elements ecry3.1 Ab

, pmi, the CMP promoter, the ZmUbiInt promoter, and the

NOS terminators in 5307 corn were identical to those in the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

One nucleotide change was identified in the 5307 corn insert 48 bp upstream of the CMP promoter in a n on

- codin g region of the T

- DNA (Figure III

- 1 ). This nucleotide change has

no effect on the trans genes encoded by 5307 corn

.

Sequence analysis revealed that some truncation occurred at the right border (RB) and left border (LB) ends of the T

- DNA during the transformation process. The entire RB, three bp

of non

- coding sequence at the 5 ′ end of the insert , and eight bp of the LB were truncated. These deletions had no effect on the functionality of the insert ; similar deletions have previousl y been observed in transformations with Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Tinland and

Hohn

, 1995 ; Brunaud et al.

, 2002 ; Chilton and Que

, 2003).

V.B . Copy Number of Functional Elements



### Southern blot analyses demonstrated that 5307 corn contains a single copy of ecry3.1Ab, pmi , the CMP promoter sequence, and the ZmUbiInt promoter sequence and two copies of the NOS terminator sequence, as expected for a single insertion site. Results also indicated that there are no extraneous DNA fragments of the functional eleme nts elsewhere in the5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 39 of 211 

### 5307 corn genome, and that 5307 corn is free of backbone sequence from the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

Southern blot analyses to establish the copy number of each functional element utilized five

element

- specific probes (the ecry 3.1Ab

- specific probe, the pmi

- specific probe, the CMP
promoter

- specific probe, the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, and the NOS terminator

specific probe). Southern blot analyses included genomic DNA extracted from 5307 plants of genotype 5307 NP2171 × B C5F 3



### For these experiments, genomic DNA was analyzed using two restriction enzyme digestion strategies to assess the pre sence, size, intactness, and copy number of each functional

element

. The locations of restriction endonuclease sites are indicated in Figure V

- 1

. In the first strategy, the corn genomic DNA was digested with an enzyme that cut once within the

5307 corn i nsert. The other recognition sites for this enzyme were located in the corn genome flanking the 5307 corn insert. This first strategy was used twice with two different enzymes to determine the copy number of the functional element and the presence or

abs ence of extraneous DNA fragments of the functional elements of plasmid pSYN12274 in other regions of the 5307 corn genome. For Southern blot analyses with the ecry3.1Ab

specific probe, enzymes Kpn I and Nco I were used; for Southern blot analyses with the p mi

specific probe, enzymes Bst EII and Spe I were used; for Southern blot analyses with the CMP promoter

- specific probe, enzymes Kpn I and Spe I were used; for Southern blot analyses with the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, enzymes Bst EII and Spe I were used; and for Southern blot analyses with the NOS terminator

- specific probe, enzymes Kpn I and

Nco I were used. and the near

- isogenic control plants of genotype

NP2171 × NP2460 (see breeding pedigree in Figure III

- 3 ). Each Southern blot contained a positive control and a negative control. The positive control, representing one copy of a fragment of known size in the corn genome, was included to demonstrate the sensitivity of each experiment

. T he negative control, DNA extracted from plants grown from nontransgenic corn seed, was included to identify possible endogenous DNA sequences that hybridize with the pro be. T he ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe cross

- hybridizes to genomic DNA fragments of different sizes in the different corn genotypes due to restriction fragment length polymorphism of the genomic DNA that carries the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter. For the Southern blot analyses with the ZmUbiInt promoter

specific probe, genomic DNA extracts from control plants of inbred geno types NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171 were also needed because the 5307 corn generation analyzed was created by crossing with these corn lines.

For Southern blot analyses with the ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe, the pmi

- specific probe, the CMP promoter

- specific probe, and the ZmUbiInt promoter

- spec ific probe, these digests were expected to result in only one hybridization band specific to the corresponding functional element. More than one band with either digest would have indicated that there were multiple copies of the corresponding functional e lement in the plant genome. For Southern blot analyses with the NOS terminator

- specific probe, the digests used were expected to result in two hybridization bands corresponding to the two NOS terminator sequences in the 5307 corn insert (the NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry3.1Ab and5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 40 of 211 Figure V

- 1. Map of plasmid pSYN12274 indicating the restriction sites used in the Southern blot analyses (shown in bold type).



### the NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ). More than two ban ds with either digest would have indicated additional copies of the NOS terminator sequence in the plant genome. In the second strategy, the corn genomic DNA was digested with two enzymes, which released a DNA fragment of predictable size. This strateg y was used to determine the presence or absence of any closely linked extraneous DNA fragments of the functional elements in plasmid pSYN12274. For this strategy, enzymes Sma I + Pme I were used for all Southern blot analyses with element

- specific probes.

Details of each Southern blot analysis are described below. For each analysis , there is a map showing the location of the restriction en donuclease s ites in relation to each element probe

used.

V.B.1

. Copy Number of Functional Elements: ecry3.1Ab Gene



### A probe containing the entire sequence of ecry3.1Ab was used for the ecry3.1Ab Southern

blot analyse s. A map of the T

- DNA region i n plasmid p SYN12 274 indicating location s of

the ecry3.1Ab coding sequence and the restriction endonuclease sites targeted in these Southern blot analyses is shown in Figure V

- 2

. The results of these analyses are displayed in Figure V

- 3 . Table V

- 1 shows a comparison of expected versus observed hybridization

band sizes.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 41 of 211 

### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Kp n I and p robed with the ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 8.5 kb was observed in

the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Nco I and probed with the ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 19 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants ( Figure V

- 3 A, Lane

A 3) (Table V

- 1). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 3 A, Lane A 4) and was, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert. One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in th e lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and

loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 3 A, Lane A 5).

3 

### plants (Figure V

- 3 B, Lane

B 3) (Table V

- 1). This hybridization band was absent in the lan e containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 3 B, Lane B 4) and was, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert. One hybridization band of approximately 3.9 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pS YN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I +

Nco I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 3 B, Lane

B 5 ).

Figure V

- 2. Location of the Kpn I, Nco I , Sma I , and Pme I restriction sites and position of

the 1962

- bp ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 42 of 211 (A ) Kpn I

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers
Lane A2 = blank
Lane A3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I digested with Kpn I

Lane A5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I) (B) Nco I

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers
Lane B2 = blank
Lane B3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane B4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I digested with Nco I

Lane B5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I +
Nco I) (C) Sma I + Pme I

Lane C1 = molecular weight markers
Lane C2 = blank
Lane C3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3

Lane C4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I +
Pme I digested with
Sma I + Pme I

Lane C5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 3

. Southern blot analysi s of 5307 corn for copy number of functional elements : 1962

- bp ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I , Nco I , and Sma I + Pme I5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 43 of 211 Table V

- 1 . Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using an ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Kpn I, Nco I, and

Sma I + Pme I.

1 Digestion of pSYN12274 with Nco I was the result of addition to NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and p robed with the ecry3.1Ab

- specific probe , one hybridization band of approximately 6. 3 kb was observed in

the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analyses with the ecry3.1Ab

- specfic probe, detection of only one hybridization band of the expected size for each restric tion enzyme digestion strategy

demonstrated that the 5307 corn insert contains a single copy of ecry3.1Ab at a single locus. No unexpected bands were detected, indicating that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of ecry3.1Ab in the 5307 corn genome. plants ( Figure V

- 3 C, Lane

C 3) (Table V

- 1 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 3 C, Lane C 4) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and

loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 3 C, Lane C 5 ). Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb)

Fig. V

- 3 A,
Lane A 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Kpn I 3 1 > 2.8

~ 8.5

Fig

. V

- 3 A,
Lane A 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Kpn I none none none

Fig

. V

- 3 A,
Lane A 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig

. V

- 3 B,
Lane B 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Nco I 3 1 > 3.9

~ 19

Fig. V

- 3 B,
Lane B 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Nco I none none none

Fig

. V

- 3 B,
Lane B 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I ) Sma I + Pme I

+ Nco I 1 1

~ 3.9

~ 3.9

Fig. V

- 3 C,
Lane C 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I 3 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig

. V

- 3 C,
Lane C 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig. V

- 3 C,
Lane C 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × P2460 digested with Sma I +
Pme I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.35307

- USDA

- 1 Page 44 of 211 V

. B .2

. Copy Number of Functional Elements: CMP promoter



### A probe con taining the entire sequence of the CMP promoter was used for the CMP
promoter Southern blot analyses. A map of the T

- DNA region in plasmid pSYN12274 indicating locations of the CMP promoter sequence and the restriction endonuclease sites targeted in these Southern blot analyses is shown in Figure V

- 4 . The results of these analyses are displayed in Figure V

- 5 . Table V

- 2 shows a comparison of expected versus observed hybridization band sizes.

Figure V

- 4. Location of the Kpn I, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction site s and position of

the 346

- bp CMP promoter

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 45 of 211 

### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Kpn I and p robed with the CMP
promoter

- specific probe, one hybridi zation band of approximately 8.5 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Spe I and probed with the CMP
promoter

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 2.6 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected (Figure

V

- 5 A, Lane A 3) (Table V

- 2 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 5 A, Lane A 4 ) and was therefore , specific

to the 5307 corn insert

. One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in

the lane contain ing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants ) (Figure

V

- 5 A, Lane A 5).

3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the CMP promoter

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected (Figure

V

- 5 B, Lane B 3) (Table V

- 2 ). This hybridization band was a bsent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 5 B, Lane B 4) and was therefore, specific

to the 5307 corn insert . One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 p g of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure

V

- 5 B, Lane B 5).

3



### For Southern blot analyses with the CMP promoter

- specfic probe, detection of only one hybridization band of the expected size for each restriction enzyme digestion strategy

demonstrated that the 5307 corn insert contains a single copy of the CMP promoter

s equence at a single locus. No unexpected bands were detected, indicating that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of the CMP promoter sequence in the 5307 corn genome. plants as expected (Figure V

- 5 C, Lane C 3) (Table V

- 2 ). This hybridization band was a bsent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 5 C, Lane C 4) and was therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 p g of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 5 C, Lane C 5 ).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 46 of 211 (A) Kpn I

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers
Lane A2 = blank
Lane A3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I digested with Kpn I

Lane A5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Kpn I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested
with Sma I + Pme I) (B) Spe I

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers
Lane B2 = blank
Lane B3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane B4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane B5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Spe I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested
with Sma I + Pme I) (C) Sma I + Pme I

Lane C1 = molecular weight markers
Lane C2 = blank
Lane C3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3

Lane C4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I +
Pme I

Lane C5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Sma I + Pme I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 5. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for c opy number of functional elements: 346

- bp CMP promoter

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 47 of 211 Table V

- 2. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a CMP promoter

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Kpn I, Spe I,

and Sma I + Pme I.

Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb) Fig. V

- 5 A,
Lane A 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Kpn I 3 1 > 2.8

~ 8.5

Fig. V

- 5 A,
Lane A 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Kpn I none none None

Fig.V

- 5 A,
Lane A 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig. V

- 5 B,
Lane B 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Spe I 3 1 > 0.6

~ 2.6

Fig. V

- 5 B,
Lane B 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Spe I none none none

Fig. V

- 5 B,
Lane B 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig. V

- 5 C,
Lane C 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I 3 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig. V

- 5 C,

Lane C 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig. V

- 5 C,
Lane C 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I +
Pme I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

V.B

. 3

. Copy Number of Functional Elements: pmi Gene



### A probe containing the entire sequence of pmi was used for the pmi Southern blot analyses

. Figure V

- 6 shows a map of the T

- DNA of 5307 corn transformation plasmid pSYN12274, indicating the location of the pmi

- specific probe and restriction sites for Bst EII , Spe I , Sma I,

and Pme I. Figure V

- 7 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and

Table V

- 3 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Bst EII and probed with the pmi

specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 7.2 kb was observed in the lan e containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Spe I and probed with the pmi

specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 7.0 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants (Figure V

- 7 , Lane 3) (Table

V

- 3 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 7 , Lane 4) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert

.

3 

### plants (Figure V

- 7, Lane 5) (Table

V

- 3). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 7, Lane 6) and was, therefore , specific to the 5307 corn insert

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 48 of 211 Figure V

- 6. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 1176

- bp pmi

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the pmi

- specific probe, one hybridization b and of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analyses with the pmi

- specfic probe, detection of only one hybridization band of the expected size for each restriction enzyme digestion strategy demonst rated that

the 5307 corn insert contains a single copy of pmi at a single locus. No unexpected bands were detected, indicating that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of pmi in the 5307

corn genome. plants (Figure V

- 7 , Lane 7) (Table

V

- 3 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 7 , La ne 8) and was, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with

DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 7 , Lane 9).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 49 of 211 Lane 1 = molecular weight markers

Lane 2 = bl ank

Lane 3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane 5 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 6 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane 7 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 8 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane 9 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with

Sma I + Pme I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with

Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 7. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for c opy number of functional

elements: 1176

- bp pmi

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and

Sma I + Pme I

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 50 of 211 Table V

- 3 . Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a pmi

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I

+ Pme I

.

Fig. V

- 7
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb)

3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Bst EII 3 1 > 4.0 kb ~ 7.2 kb

4 NP2171 × NP2460 Bst EII none none none

5 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Spe I 3 1 > 5.9 kb ~ 7.0 kb

6 NP2171 × NP2460 Spe I none none none

7 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I 3 1

~ 6.3 kb

~ 6.3 kb

8 NP2171 × NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

9 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with NP2171

× NP2460 digested with Sma I +
Pme I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3 kb

~ 6.3 kb

V.B. 4 . Copy Number of Functional Elements: ZmUbiInt promoter



### A probe containing the entire sequence of the ZmUbiInt promoter was used for the

ZmUbiInt promoter Southern blot analyses

. Figure V

- 8 shows a map of the T

- DNA of 5307

corn transformation plasmid pSYN12274, indicating the location of the ZmUbiInt promoter

specific probe and restriction sites for Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I. Figure V

- 9 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and Table V

- 4 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Bst EII and probed with the

ZmUbiI nt promoter

- specific probe, a hybridization band of approximately 7.2 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### Additional bands resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence were also detected in all material analyzed. Two hybrid ization bands of approximately 12 kb and 18 kb corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 6) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 5 ), plants as expected (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 3) (Table V

- 4 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lanes containing DNA extracted from the control plants NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane 4) and additional controls NP2171, NP2222 and NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 A, Lanes A 5, A 6,

and A 7) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . Three hybridization bands of approximately 3.9 kb, 8.4 kb, and 18 kb were observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I + Bst EII and

loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 8).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 51 of 211 

### respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants ( Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 3). Two hybridization bands of approximately 8.4 kb and 18 kb corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 7) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane 5), respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 A, Lane A 4) and the lane containing the positive control (Figure

V

- 9 A, Lane A 8)

.

Figure V

- 8. Location of the Bst EI I

, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction site s and position

of the 1993

- bp ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 52 of 211 (A) Bst EII

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers
Lane A2 = blank
Lane A3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EI l I

Lane A5 = NP2171 digested with Bst EII Lane A6 = NP2222 digested with Bst EII Lane A7 = NP2460 digested with Bst EII
Lane A8 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Bst EII and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I + Bst EII) (B) Spe I

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers
Lane B2 = blank
Lane B3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane B4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane B5 = NP2171 digested with Spe I Lane B6 = NP2222 digested with Spe I Lane B7 = NP2460 digested with Spe I
Lane B8 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Spe I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested

with Sma I + Pme I) (C) Sma I + Pme I

L ane C1 = molecular weight markers
Lane C2 = blank
Lane C3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3

Lane C4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I

+ Pme I digested with Sma I +
Pme I

Lane C5 = NP2171 digested with Sma I + Pme I Lane C6 = NP2222 digested with Sma I + Pme I Lane C7 = NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I
Lane C8 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Sma I + Pme I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 9. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for c opy number of functional elements: 1993

- bp ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EI I

, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 53 of 211 Table V

- 4 . Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

.
Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb)

Fig. V

- 9 A,
Lane A 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Bst EII 3 1 5307 insert x endogenous > 4.0
unknown ~ 7.2

~ 12 (endogenous)

~ 18 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 9 A

, Lane A 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Bst EII x endogenous unknown ~ 8.4 (endogenous)

~ 18 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 9 A,
Lane A 5 NP2171 Bst EII x endogenous unknown

~ 18 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 A,
Lane A 6 NP2222 Bst EII x endogenous unknown

~ 12 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 9 A,
Lane A 7 NP2460 Bst EII x endogenous unknown

~ 8.4 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 A,
Lane A 8 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with

NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Bst EII ) Sma I + Pme I

+ Bst EII 1 pSYN12274

1 x endogenous ~ 3.9
unknown ~ 3.9

~ 8.4 (endogenous)

~ 18 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9B

, Lane B 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Spe I 3 1 5307 insert x endogenous > 5.9

unknown ~ 7.0

~ 14 (endogenous)

~ 25 (endogenous) Fig

. V

- 9 B,
Lane B 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Spe I x endogenous unknown ~ 14 (endogenous)

~ 20 (endogenous) Fig

. V

- 9B

, Lane B 5 NP2171 Spe I x endogenous unknown

~ 14 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9B

, Lane B 6 NP2222 Spe I x endogenous unknown

~ 25 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9B

, Lane B 7 NP2460 Spe I x endogenous unknown

~ 20 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 9 B,
Lane B 8 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with
NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Spe I ) Sma I + Pme I 1 pSYN12274 x endogenous ~ 6.3
unknown ~ 6.3

~ 14 (endogenous)

~ 20 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 C,

Lane C 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I 3 1 5307 insert x endogenous ~ 6.3

unknown ~ 6.3

~ 18 (endogenous)

> 30 (endogenous) Fig

. V

- 9 C,
Lane C 4 NP2171 × NP2460 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown > 30 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 C,
Lane C 5 NP2171 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown > 30 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 C,
Lane C 6 NP2222 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown

~ 18 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 C,
Lane C 7 NP2460 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous U nknown > 30 (endogenous)

Fig

. V

- 9 C,
Lane C 8 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with

NP2171 × NP2460 digested

with Sma I + Pme I ) Sma I + Pme I 1 pSYN12274 x endogenous ~ 6.3

u n known ~ 6.3

> 30 (endogenous)

x = unknown number

1 Digestion of pSYN12274 with Bst EII was the result of addition to NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 54 of 211 

### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Spe I and p robed with the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, a hybridization band of approximately 7.0 k b was

observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### Additional bands resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence were also det ected in all material analyzed. Two hybridization bands of approximately 25 kb and 14 kb corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 6) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 5)

, respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 3) (Table V

- 4 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 B,

Lane B 4) and additional controls NP2171, NP2222, and NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 B, Lanes B 5,

B 6, and B 7) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . Three hybridization bands of approximately 6.3 kb, 14 kb, and 20 kb were observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with

DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 8).

3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was

observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 3). Finally, two hybridization bands of approximately 20 kb and 14 kb corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes contain ing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 7) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 9 B,

Lane B 5), respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 B, Lane B 4) and the lane containing the positive control (Figure

V

- 9 B, Lane B 8).

3



### At least one additional band resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiInt promoter

specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence was also detected in all material analyzed. One hybridization band of approximately 18 kb corresponding to the hybridization band observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 6) was observed in the lane containing DNA

extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 3) (Table V

- 4 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 C,

Lane C 4) an d additional controls NP2171, NP2222, and NP2460 (Figure V

- 9 C, Lanes C 5,

C 6, and C 7) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert . A hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb and a high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from N P2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure

V

- 9 C, Lane C 8).

3 

### plants (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 3). An additional high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Fig u re V

- 9 C, Lane C 7) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 5). This faint high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was also observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 3), the5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 55 of 211 

### lane containing DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 4), and the lane containing the positive control (Figure V

- 9 C, Lane C 8).

For Southern blot analyses with the ZmUbiInt promoter

- specfic probe, detection of only one hybridization band specific to 5307 corn for each restriction enzyme digestion enzyme

demonstrated that the 5307 corn genome contains a single copy of the ZmUbiInt promoter sequence at a single locus. No unexpected bands were detected, indicating that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of t he ZmUbiInt promoter sequence in the 5307 corn

genome.

V.B. 5 . Copy Number of Functional Elements: NOS terminator


### A probe containing the entire sequence of the NOS terminator was used for the NOS

terminator Southern blot analyses. Figure V

- 10 shows a map of the T

- DNA of 5307 corn transformation plasmid pSYN12274, indicating the location of the NOS terminator

- specific probe and restriction sites for Kpn I, Nco I, and Sma I + Pme I. Figure V

- 1 1 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and Table V

- 5 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

Figure V

- 10. Location of the Kpn I

, Nco I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction site s and position

of the 253

- bp NOS terminator

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 56 of 211 

### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Kpn I and probed with the NOS

terminator

- specific probe, two hybridization bands of approximately 6.4 kb and 8.5 kb were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Nco I and probed with the NOS

terminator

- specific probe, two hybridization bands of approximately 16 kb and 19 kb were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected ( Figure V

- 1 1 A, Lane A 3) (Table V

- 5 ). These hybridization bands were absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 1 A , Lanes A 4) and

were
, therefore, specific to the two copies o f the NOS terminator sequence in the 5307 corn insert (one NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry3.1Ab and one NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ). One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive contro l (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure

V

- 1 1 A, Lane A 5).

3



### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the

NOS terminator

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F plants as expected (Figure V

- 1 1 B, Lane B 3) (Table V

- 5 ). These hybridiza tion bands were absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 1 B, Lanes B 4) and

were
, therefore, specific to the two copies of the NOS terminator sequence in the 5307 corn insert (one NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry 3.1Ab and one NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ). Two hybridization bands of approximately 2.5 kb and 3.9 kb were observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I + Nco I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 1 1 B, Lane B 5).

3



### For Southern blot analyses with the NOS terminator

- spec i fic probe, detection of two hybridization bands of the expected size for each restriction enzyme digestion strategy

demonstrated that 5307 corn contains two c opies of the NOS terminator sequence (one NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry3.1Ab and one NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ) at a single locus. No unexpected bands were detected, indicating that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of the NOS terminator sequence in the 5307 corn genome. plants as expected (Figure V

- 1 1 C, Lane C 3) (Table V

- 5 ). This hybridization band was absent in the lane containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 1 C, Lanes C 4) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert. One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb was observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 1 C, Lane C 9).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 57 of 211 (A) Kpn I

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers

Lane A2 = blank

Lane A3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I digested with Kpn I

Lane A5 = Positive control ( NP217 1 × NP2460 digested with Kpn I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I) (B) Nco I

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers

Lane B2 = blank

Lane B3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane B4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I digested with Nco I

Lane B5 = Positive control (NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Nco I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I +
Nco I) (C) Sma I + Pme I

Lane C1 = molecular weight markers

Lane C2 = blank

Lane C3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3

Lane C4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I +
Pme digested with Sma I

+ Pme I

Lane C5 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 11. Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for c opy number of functional elements: 253

- bp NOS terminator

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Kpn I

, Nco I, and Sma I + Pme I

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 58 of 211 Table V

- 5 . Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a NOS terminator

- specific probe and rest riction enzymes Kpn I

, Nco I,

and Sma I + Pme I

.

Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb)

Fig. V

- 1 1 A

, Lane A 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Kpn I 2 > 2.8

> 3.6 ~ 6.4

~ 8.5 Fig. V

- 11 A,
Lane A 4 NP2171/NP2460 Kpn I none none none

Fig. V

- 11 A,
Lane A 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with
NP2171/NP2460 digested with Kpn I ) Sma I + Pme I 1 ~6.3

~ 6.3

Fig. V

- 1 1 B,
Lane B 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Nco I 2 > 2.5

> 3.9 ~ 16

~ 19 Fig. V

- 11 B,
Lane B 4 NP2171/NP2460 Nco I none none None

Fig. V

- 11 B,
Lane B 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with
NP2171/NP2460 digested with
Nco I ) Sma I + Pme I + Nco I 1 2 ~ 2.5

~ 3.9 ~ 2.5

~ 3.9

Fig. V

- 11 C,
Lane C 3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

Fig. V

- 11 C,
Lane C 4 NP2171/NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig. V

- 11 C,
Lane C 5 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274 mixed with
NP2171/NP2460 digested with
Sma I + Pme I ) Sma I + Pme I 1

~ 6.3

~ 6.3

1 Digestion of pSYN12274 with Nco I was the result of addition to NP2171/NP2460 digested with Nco I

V.C . Absence of Plasmid Backbone Elements



### Figure V

- 1 2 shows a map of the plasmid pSYN12274 indicating the location of the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe and restriction sites for Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I +

Pme I. Figure V

- 1 3 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and

Table V

- 6 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

For Southern blot analyses with genomic DNA digested with Bst EII and probed with the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were observed in the

lanes conta ining DNA extracted from plants grown from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### (Figure V

13, Lane 3) (Table V

- 6) and NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 13, Lane 4) (Table V

- 6 ) as expected.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 59 of 211 Figure V

- 12. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position

of the 5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe in the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.



### For Southern blot analyses with genomic DNA digested with Spe I and probed with the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were obse rved in the lanes containing DNA extracted from plants grown from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3



### For Southern blot analyses with genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were observed in the lanes containing DNA extracted from plants grown from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F (Figure V

13 , Lane 5) (Table V

- 6 ) and NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 1 3 , Lane 6) (Table V

- 6 ) as expected.

3



### No hybridization bands were detected in the 5307 plant DNA , illustrating that 5307 NP2171

× BC5F (Figure

V

- 1 3 , Lane 7) (Table V

- 6 ) and NP2171 × NP2460 (Figure V

- 1 3 , La ne 8) (Table V

- 6 ) as expected. The positive control ( 16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sma I

+ Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants ) produced the expected hybridization bands of approximately 4.2 kb and 1.2 kb band ( Figure V

- 1 3 , Lane 9).

3 

### corn does not contain any backbone sequences from the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 60 of 211 Lane 1 = molecular weight markers

Lane 2 = blank

Lane 3 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 4 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane 5 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 6 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane 7 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane 8 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane 9 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I
and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 13 . Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn for copy number of functional

elements: 5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 61 of 211 Table V

- 6 . Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe and restriction

enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

.

Lane No. in Figure

V

- 1 3 Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

bands Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb)

3 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Bst EII none none none

4 NP2171/NP2460 Bst EII none none none

5 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Spe I none none none

6 NP2171/NP2460 Spe I none none none

7 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Sma I + Pme I none none none

8 NP2171/NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

9 Positive control (16.53 pg of pSYN12274
mixed with NP2171/NP2460 digested with
Sma I + Pme I) Sma I + Pme I 2 ~ 1.2

~ 4.2 ~ 1.2

~ 4.2

V. D

. Genetic Stability of 5307 Corn Over Four Generation s



### Molecular analyses were performed to demonstrate the genetic stability of the 5307 corn insert over four generations. Southern blot analyses were performed using standard molecular biology techniques. Each Southern blot contained a positive control and a negative control. The positive control, representing one copy of a fragment of known size in

the corn genome, was included to demonstrate the sensitivity of each experiment; the negative control, DNA e xtracted from plants grown from nontransgenic corn se ed, was included in order to identify possible endogenous DNA sequences that hybridize with the probe. Two probes were used: a full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe containing every base of the plasmid pSYN12274 T

- DNA and a plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe containing every base of plasmid pSYN12274 present outside of the T

- DNA region.

These Southern blot analyses demonstrated that the 5307 corn genome contains a single, complete copy of the insert and that there are no extraneous DNA fragments of p lasmid pSYN12274 T

- DNA inserted elsewhere in the 5307 corn genome. Identical hybridization patterns across all generations of 5307 corn analyzed in this study indicate that the insert is stably inherited from one generation to the next. Additionally, eve ry generation of 5307

corn examined was free of backbone sequence from the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.

D e scripti ons and results of the se Southern blot analyse s to assess genetic stability of 5307

corn are provided below . Details of the methods used are provided in Appendix B.

V.D.1

. Stability of the T

- DNA Using a Full

- Length T

- DNA

- s pecific Probe


### Genetic stability of the insert during conventional breeding of 5307 corn was determined by Southern blot analyses using a fu ll length T

- DNA

- specific probe

. The Southern blot5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 62 of 211 

### analyses included genomic DNA extracted from 5307 plants of four generations (5307 F 1


### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### ) and the corresponding nontransgenic, near

isogenic control genotypes ( NP2171 × NP2460, NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171) ( see Figure

III

- 3 breeding pedigree). The full length T

- DNA

- specific probe, which contains seque nce of the maize polyubiquitin promoter (ZmUbiInt), cross

- hybridizes to genomic DNA fragments

of different sizes in the different corn lines due to restriction fragment length polymorphism of the genomic DNA that carries the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter. Control genomic DNA from inbred lines NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171 was needed because the

5307 corn generat ions analyzed were created by crossing with these corn lines. For these experiments, genomic DNA was analyzed using two restriction enzyme digestion strategies.

In the first strategy, the corn genomic DNA was digested with an enzyme that cut once

withi n the 5307 corn insert. The other recognition sites for this enzyme were located in the

corn genome flanking the 5307 corn insert. This first strategy was used twice with two different enzymes ( Bst EII and Spe I) to determine the copy number of the 5307 corn insert and the presence or absence of extraneous DNA fragments of the plasmid pSYN12274 T

DNA in other regions of the 5307 corn genome. These digests were expected to result in only two hybridization bands corresponding to the 5307 corn insert when a full length T

DNA

- specific probe was used. More than two bands with either digest would have

indicated that there were multiple copies of the insert in the plant genome.

In the second strategy, the corn genomic DNA was digested with Sma I + Pme I, which cut
within the 5307 corn insert such that a DNA fragment of predictable size was released. This strategy was used to determine the presence of any closely linked extraneous DNA fragments of the plasmid pSYN12274 T

- DNA.

Figure V

- 1 4 shows a map of the T

- DNA of the 5307 corn transformation plasmid pSYN12274, indi cating the location of the full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe and restriction

sites for Bst EII , Spe I , Sma I, and Pme I. Figure V

- 1 5 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and Table V

- 7 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Bst EII and probed with the full length T

- DNA

- speci fic probe, two hybridization bands of approximately 2.9 kb and 7.2 kb were observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from 5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and

5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants as expected (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6) (Table V

- 7 ). These hybridization bands were absent in lanes containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lanes 7, 8, 9, and 10) and were

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert. Three hybridization bands of approximately 11.8 kb, 14 kb, and 20 kb were observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Spe I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × N P2460 plants) (Figure V

- 1 5

, Lane 19).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 63 of 211 Figure V

- 14. Location of the Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I restriction sites and position of the 6423

- bp full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe in the T

- DNA region of the transformation plasmid pSYN12274.



### Additional bands resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiInt promoter sequence present on the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence were also detected in all material analyzed. Two hybridization bands of approximately 8.4 kb and 12 kb, corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 9) and NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 8), respectively, were observed in lanes containing D NA extracted from

5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, and 5307 BC7 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lanes 3, 4, and 5). Two hybridization bands of approximately 12 kb and 18 kb, corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants (Fi gure V

- 1 5 , Lane 8) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 10), respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 6). Finally, two hybridization bands of approximately 8.4 kb and 18 kb, corres ponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 9) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 , Lane 10), respectively, were observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figu re V

- 1 5

, Lane 7).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 64 of 211 

### For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Spe I and probed with the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe, two hybridization bands of approximately 2.6 kb and 7.0 kb were observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from 5307 F 1


### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and

5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants as expected (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lanes 11, 12, 13, and 14) (Table

V

- 7 ). These bands were absent in lanes containing DNA extracted from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lanes 15, 16, 17, and 18) and were

, there fore

, specific to the 5307 corn insert. Three hybridization bands of approximately 11.8 kb, 14 kb, and 20 kb were observed in the lane containing the positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested

with Spe I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane 19).

(A) Bst EII or Spe I

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers
Lane A2 = blank
Lane A3 = 5307 F 1 Lane A4 = 5307 BC6 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane A5 = 5307 BC7 digested with Bst EII
Lane A6 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A7 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane A8 = NP2222 digested with Bst EII Lane A9 = NP2460 digested with Bst EII Lane A10 = NP2171 digested with Bst EII
Lane A11 = 5307 F 1 Lane A12 = 5307 BC6 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane A13 = 5307 BC7 digested with Spe I
Lane A14 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A15 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane A16 = NP2222 digested with Spe I Lane A17 = NP2460 digested with Spe I Lane A18 = NP2171 digested with Spe I Lane A19 = Positive control (NP2171 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Spe I)

Figure V

- 15. Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the 6423

- bp

full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I +

Pme I.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 65 of 211 (B) **Sma** I + **Pme** I

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers

Lane B2 = blank

Lane B3 = 5307 F 1 Lane B4 = 5307 BC6 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B5 = 5307 BC7 digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B6 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane B7 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B8 = NP2222 digested with Sma I + Pme I
Lane B9 = NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B10 = NP2171 digested with Sma I + Pme I Lane B11 = Positive control (NP2171 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I)

Figure V

- 15 (continued). Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the

6423

- bp full

- length T

- DNA

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes BstEII, SpeI, and

SmaI + PmeI.



### Additional bands resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiIn t promoter sequence present on the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence were also detected in all material analyzed. Two hybridization bands of approximately 20 kb and 25 kb, corresponding to the hybri dization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 17) and NP2222 plants (FigureV

- 1 5 A, Lane A 16), respectively, were observed in lanes containing DNA

extracted from 5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, and 5307 BC7 plants (Figu re V

- 1 5 A, Lanes A 11, A 12,

and A 13). Two hybridization bands of approximately 14 kb and 25 kb, corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 18) and NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 16), respectively, were observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 14).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 66 of 211 Table V

- 7

. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a full length T

- DNA

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

.

Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of bands Expected band size (kb) Observed band size (kb)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 3 5307 F Bst EII 1 2 5307 insert x endogenous >2.4

>4
unknown ~2.9

~7.2
~8.4 (endogenous)

~12 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 4 5307 BC6 Bst EII 2 5307 insert x endogenous >2.4

>4
unknown ~2.9

~7.2

~8.4 (endogenous)

~12 (endogenous)

Fig.V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 5 5307 BC7 Bst EII 2 5307 insert x endogenous >2.4

>4
unknown ~2.9

~7.2

~8.4 (endogenous)

~12 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 6 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Bst EII 3 2 5307 insert x endogenous >2.4

>4
unknown ~2.9

~7.2

~12 (endogenous)

~18 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 7 NP2171 × NP2460 Bst EII x endogenous unknown ~8.4 (endogenous)

~18 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 8 NP2222 Bst EII x endogenous unknown ~12 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 9 NP2460 Bst EII x endogenous unknown ~8.4 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 10 NP2171 Bst EII x endogenous unknown ~18 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 11 5307 F Spe I 1 2 5307 insert x endogenous >0.6
>5.8
unknown ~2.6

~7
~20 (endogenous)

~25 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 12 5307 BC6 Spe I 2 5307 insert x endogenous >0.6
>5.8
unknown ~2.6

~7
~20 (endogenous)

~25 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 13 5307 BC7 Spe I 2 5307 insert x endogenous >0.6
>5.8
unknown ~2.6

~7
~20 (endogenous)

~25 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 14 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Spe I 3 2 5307 insert x endogenous >0.6
>5.8
unknown ~2.6

~7

~14 (endogenous)

~25 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 15 NP2171 × NP2460 Spe I x endogenous unknown ~14 (endogenous)

~20 (endogenous) Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 16 NP2222 Spe I x endogenous unknown ~25 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 17 NP2460 Spe I x endogenous unknown ~20 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 18 NP2171 Spe I x endogenous unknown ~14 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 A,
Lane A 19 Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460
and 16. 5 3 pg of pSYN12274) Spe I 1 pSYN12274 x endogenous 11.8
U nknown ~11.8

~14 (endogenous)

~20 (endogenous)

x = unknown number5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 67 of 211 Table V

- 7 (continued). Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn , using a full length T

- DNA

- specific probe and restriction

enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

.

Figure &
Lane No. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of bands Expected band size (kb) Observed band size (kb)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 3 5307 F Sma I + Pme I 1 1 5307 insert x endogenous 6.3
U nknown ~6.3 ~18 (endogenous) >30 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 4 5307 BC6 Sma I + Pme I 1 5307 insert x endogenous 6.3

u nknown ~6.3 ~18 (endogenous) >30 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 5 5307 BC7 Sma I + Pme I 1 5307 insert x endogenous 6.3

u nknown ~6.3 ~18 (endogenous) >30 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 6 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I

3 1 5307 insert x endogenous 6.3

u nknown ~6.3 ~18 (endogenous) >30 (endogenous)
Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 7 NP2171 ×
NP2460 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown >30 (endogenous)

Fig . V

- 15 B,
Lane B 8 NP2222 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown ~18 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 9 NP2460 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown >30 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 10 NP2171 Sma I + Pme I x endogenous unknown >30 (endogenous)

Fig. V

- 1 5 B,
Lane B 11 Positive control ( NP2171 ×
NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274) Sma I + Pme I 1 pSYN12274 x endogenous 6.3
unknown ~6.3 >30 (endogenous)

x = unknown number



### Finally, two hybridization bands of approximately 14 kb and 20 kb, corresponding to the hybridization bands observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 18) and NP246 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A, Lane A 17), respectively, were observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 A,

Lane A 15). For Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe, one hybridization band of approximately

6.3 kb was observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from 5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and 53 07 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### plants as expected (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lanes B 3, B 4, B 5, and

B 6) (Table V

- 7 ). This hybridization band was absent in lanes containing DNA extracted

from the control plants (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lanes B 7, B 8, B 9, and B 10) and was

, therefore, specific to the 5307 corn insert. One hybridization band of approximately 6.3 kb and a high

molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was observed in the lane containing the positive

control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Sm a I + Pme I and loaded with

DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lane B 11). At least one additional band resulting from cross

- hybridization of the ZmUbiInt promoter sequence present on the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe with the endog enous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence was also detected in all material analyzed. One hybridization band of approximately 18 kb, corresponding to the hybridization band observed in the lane containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lane B 8), was observed in lanes containing DNA extracted from 5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7 and 5307 NP2171 ×5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 68 of 211 

### BC5F 3 

### plants (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lanes B 3, B 4, B 5, and B 6). An additional high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was observed in lanes conta ining DNA extracted from NP2460 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lane B 9) and NP2171 plants (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lane B 10). This faint high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) was observed in all lanes containing DNA extracted from plants carrying either the NP2460 polyubiquitin promoter allele (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and NP2171 × NP2460) (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lanes B 3,

B 4, B 5, and B 7) and/or the NP2171 polyubiquitin promoter allele (5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### and NP2171 × NP2460) (Figure V

- 1 5 B, Lanes B 6 and B 7).

Data from these Southern blot analyses demonstrated that the 5307 corn insert integrated into a single locus of the corn genome as only two hybridization bands specific to the 5307

corn insert were observed when genomic DNA was digested with Bst EII and probed with a full length T

- DNA

- specific probe and only two hybridization bands specific to the 5307

corn insert were observed when the genomic DNA was digested with Spe I and probed with a full length T

- DNA

- specific probe. These hybridization bands were s pecific to the 5307 corn insert and corresponded to each side of the restriction site of the enzyme used for Southern blot analysis. Additional hybridization bands observed resulted from cross

- hybridization

between the ZmUbiInt promoter sequence present o n the full length T

- DNA

- specific probe with the endogenous maize polyubiquitin promoter sequence; these bands were consistent

with the genetic make

- up of the various generations analyzed. As expected, the 5307 F 1


### , 5307 BC6, and 5307 BC7 generations carry the maize polyubiquitin promoter allelic forms present in NP2222 and NP2460, the 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### generation carries the maize polyubiquitin promoter allelic forms present in NP2171 and NP2222, and the control

NP2171 × NP2460 material carries the maize polyubiquitin promoter allelic forms present in

NP2171 and NP2460.

Data from these Southern blot analyses also demonstrated that a complete copy of the 5307

corn insert integrated into the corn genome as the hybridization band specific to the 5307

corn insert observed when the genomic DNA was digested with Sma I + Pme I was the predicted size. The approximately 18 kb band observed on this Southern blot was present in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2222 plants and all generations carrying the

NP222 2 polyubiquitin promoter allelic form (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and 5307

NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### ). The faint and high molecular weight band (greater than 30 kb) observed on this Southern blot was present in lanes containing DNA extracted from NP2460 plants

and NP2171 plants and all generations carrying either the NP2460 polyubiquitin promoter allelic form (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and NP2171 × NP2460) and/or the NP2171 polyubiquitin promoter allelic form (5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### and NP2171 × NP2460).

Because n o additional bands were observed (other than those associated with the 5307 corn insert and the corn endogenous sequence), Southern blot analyses indicated that there were no extraneous DNA fragments of plasmid pSYN12274 T

- DNA in other regions of the 5307

corn genome. The data depicted in the Southern blot analyses showed that the hybridization bands specific to the insert were identical in lanes containing DNA extracted from plants grown from all generations (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, and 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### );

these results indicated that the 5307 corn insert is stably inherited from one generation to the

next. Southern blot analyses demonstrated that the 5307 corn genome contains a single, complete copy of the insert and that there are no extraneous D NA fragments of plasmid5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 69 of 211 

### pSYN12274 T

- D N A inserted elsewhere in the 5307 corn genome. Identical hybridization
patterns across all generations of 5307 corn analyzed in this study indicates that the insert is stably inherited from one generation to the next.

V.D .2. Confirmation of Absence of Plasmid Backbone DNA Using a Backbone

- S pecific

Probe


### The absence of plasmid backbone sequence in 5307 corn in multiple generations of 5307 plants was assessed by Southern blot analyses using plasmid pSYN12274 backbone sequence as a probe on Southern blots of DNA subjected to the two restriction enzyme digestion strategies described above. This plasmid backbone

- specific probe contained every base of the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone present outside of the T

- DNA region. With both restriction enzyme digestion strategies, no hybridization bands were expected.

The Southern blot analyses included genomic DNA from four generations of 5307 corn plants (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### ) and the corresponding nontransgenic control plants ( NP2171 × NP2460, NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171) (see pedigree diagram, Figure III

- 3 )

. F igure V

- 1 2 shows a map of the plasmid pSYN12274 indicating the location of the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe and restriction

sites for Bst EII, Spe I, Sma I, and Pme I. Figure V

- 1 6 depicts the results of the corresponding Southern blot analyses, and Table V

- 8 provides the expected and observed sizes of the hybridization bands.

Fo r Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA digested with Bst EII and probed with the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were observed in the lanes containing DNA extracted from plants grown from the test and control substances (5 307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### , NP2171 × NP2460, NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171) (Figure V

- 1 6 A , Lanes A 3, A 4, A 5, A 6, A 7, A 8, A 9, and A 10)

, as expected. The positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Spe I

and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) produced the expected 11.8

kb band (Figure V

- 1 6 A, Lane 19). For Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA digested

with Spe I and probed with the plasmid pSYN12274 backbone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were observed in the test and control substances (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3


### , NP2171 × NP2460, NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171) (Figure V

- 1 6 A, Lanes A 11, A 12, A 13, A 14, A 15, A 16, A 17, and A 18) as expected. The positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with Spe I and loaded with

DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) produced the expected 11.8 kb band (Figure

V

- 1 6 A, Lane 19). For Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA digested with Sma I + Pme I and probed with the back bone

- specific probe, no hybridization bands were observed in the

test and control substances (5307 F 1 

### , 5307 BC6, 5307 BC7, 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3


### , NP2171

× NP2460, NP2222, NP2460, and NP2171) (Figure V

- 1 6 B, Lanes B 3, B 4, B 5, B 6, B 7, B 8,

B 9, and B 10). The positive control (16.53 pg of plasmid pSYN12274 DNA digested with

Sma I + Pme I and loaded with DNA extracted from NP2171 × NP2460 plants) produced the expected 4.2 kb and 1.2 kb bands (Figure V

- 1 6 B, Lane B 11). The data from the three

Southern blot anal yses demonstrated that all the 5307 corn generations analyzed are free of plasmid pSYN12274 backbone sequence.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 70 of 211 (A) **Bst** EII or **Spe** I

Lane A1 = molecular weight markers

Lane A2 = blank

Lane A3 = 5307 F 1 Lane A4 = 5307 BC6 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane A5 = 5307 BC7 digested with Bst EII

Lane A6 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A7 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Bst EII digested with Bst EII

Lane A8 = NP2222 digested with Bst EII Lane A9 = NP2460 digested with Bst EII

La ne A10 = NP2171 digested with Bst EII

Lane A11 = 5307 F 1 Lane A12 = 5307 BC6 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane A13 = 5307 BC7 digested with Spe I

Lane A14 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3 Lane A15 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Spe I digested with Spe I

Lane A16 = NP2222 digested with Spe I Lane A17 = NP2460 digested with Spe I Lane A18 = NP2171 digested with Spe I Lane A19 = Positive control (NP2171 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Spe I)

Figure V

- 16. Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the 5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I +

Pme I.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 71 of 211 (B) Sma **I** + Pme **I**

Lane B1 = molecular weight markers

Lane B2 = blank

Lane B3 = 5307 F 1 Lane B4 = 5307 BC6 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B5 = 5307 BC7 digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B6 = 5307 NP2171 × BC5F 3
Lane B7 = NP2171 × NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B8 = NP2222 digested with Sma I + Pme I
Lane B9 = NP2460 digested with Sma I + Pme I
Lane B10 = NP2171 digested with Sma I + Pme I

Lane B11 = Positive control ( NP2171 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274 digested with Sma I + Pme I )

Figure V

- 16 (continued). Genetic stability Southern blot analysis of 5307 corn with the

5312

- bp plasmid backbone

- specific probe, using restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and

Sma I + Pme I.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 72 of 211 Table V

- 8

. Expected and observed hybridization band sizes in Southern blot analysis of

5307 corn , using a plasmid backbone

- specific probe and restriction enzymes Bst EII, Spe I, and Sma I + Pme I

. Figure &
Lane N o. Source of DNA Restriction

enzyme Expected
number of

band s Expected
band size (kb) Observed
band size (kb) Fig . V

- 1 6 A,
Lane A 3 5307 F Bst EII 1 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 4 5307 BC6 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 5 5307 BC7 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 6 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Bst EII 3 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 7 NP2171 × NP2460 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 8 NP2222 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 9 NP2460 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 10 NP2171 Bst EII none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 11 5307 F Spe I 1 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 12 5307 BC6 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 13 5307 BC7 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 14 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Spe I 3 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 15 NP2171 × NP2460 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 16 NP2222 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 17 NP2460 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 18 NP2171 Spe I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 A

, Lane A 19 Positive control ( NP 2171 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274) Spe I 1 11.8 ~11.8

Fig

. V

- 16 B

, Lane B 3 5307 F Sma I + Pme I 1 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 4 5307 BC6 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 5 5307 BC7 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 6 5307 NP2171 × BC5F Sma I + Pme I 3 none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 7 NP2171 × NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 8 NP2222 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 9 NP2460 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig . V

- 16 B

, Lane B 10 NP2171 Sma I + Pme I none none none

Fig. V

- 16 B,
Lane B 11 Positive control ( NP21 71 × NP2460 and 16.53 pg of pSYN12274) Sma I + Pme I 2 4.2

1.2 ~4.2

~1.25307

- USDA

- 1 Page 73 of 211 V

. E

. Mendelian Inheritance of the T

- DNA Insert



### A c hi

- square ( Χ

2 

### ) a nalysis of ecry3.1Ab and pmi inheritance data over three generations of

Event 5307 corn was performed to test the hypothesis that the trans genes are inherited in

a ccordance with the laws of Mendelian genetics

. The c hi

- square analysis wa s based on a compari son of observed and expected gene segregation ratio s from each generation

. Real

time P CR analyses (Ingham et al., 2001) were conducted on DNA extracted from leaf tissue

of three generations of 5307 corn plants to determine the number of plants that were positive or negative for both the trans genes ecry3.1Ab and pmi (see method in Appendix B)

. Ninety

two plants from 5307 F 1



### Genotypic data generated for the t hree 5307 corn generations were used to assess the goodness

- of

- fit of the observed genotypic ratios to the expected genotypic ratios using c hi

square analysis with Yates’ correction factor as in Armitage and Berry (1987). seed, 91 plants from 5307 BC6 seed and 90 plants from 5307 BC7

seed were grown in a Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. greenhouse in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA (see pedigree diagram in Fig. III

- 3). During breeding, o nly progeny that tested positive for the two trans genes were selected for further crossing; thus, the expected inheritance ratio for positive to negative plants was 1:1 in each generation

.

Χ

2 = ∑ [|(observed

– expected)|

- 0.5] 2 

### All plants tested positive for the control assay targeting the endogenous corn gene adh1, confirming that DNA was present in all real

- time PCR reactions. The expected and observed frequencies of ecry3.1Ab a nd pmi for each generation are presented in Table s V

- 9

and V

- 10 . The critical value for reject ion of the null hypothesis at the 5% level wa s 3.84 (Strickberger, 1976) . The c hi

- square value s for each generation tested were found to be le ss than 3.84. Thi s analysis demonstrates that b oth the ecry3.1Ab and pmi are inherited in a predictable manner according to Mendelian principles. These results are consistent with the genetic characterization data for 5307 corn , which indicate stable integration of the T

- DNA at a single locus in the genome. / expected

Table V

- 9 . O bserved versus expected frequencies for ecry3.1Ab across generations

.

Trait F 1 B C6 B C7

Observed Expected Observed Expected Observed Expected

Positive 44 46 40 45.5 43 45

Negative 48 46 51 45.5 47 45

Total 92 92 91 91 90 90

Χ

2 0.098

value 1.099 0.1005307

- USDA

- 1 Page 74 of 211 Table V

- 10 . O bserved versus expected frequencies for pmi across generations.

Trait F 1 BC6 BC7

Observed Expected Observed Expected Observed Expected

Positive 44 46 40 45.5 43 45

Negative 48 46 51 45.5 47 45

Total 92 92 91 91 90 90

Χ

2 0.098

value 1.099 0.100

V

. F

. Flanking Sequence Analysis to Determine if T

- DNA Inserted into a Known Corn

Gene



### N ucleotide sequence s flanking the 5 **′** and 3 **′** ends of the T

- DNA in 5307 corn w ere identified by PCR, as described in Appendix B. These seq uences, representing 1000 bp at the 5 **′** end

of the T

- DNA and 1000 at the 3 **′** end of the T

- DNA , were screened for similarity with sequences found in public databases. This comparison provided an indica tion of whether

the 5307 corn T

- DNA inserted into a known plant gene. A sequence similarity analysis was performed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for Nucleotides ( BLASTN ) software

, version 2.2.19 (Altschul et al., 1997) which compared the flanking sequences with nucleotide sequences in the National Center fo r Biotechnology Information Nucleotide Collection (nr/nt) database (NCBI

, 2010 a ). The nr/nt database contains all sequences from

the National Institutes of Hea lth genetic sequence database (GenBank®), RefSeq Nucleotides, the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, the DNA Database of Japan, and nucleotide sequences derived from the three

- dimensional structure s from the Brookhaven

Protein Data B ank. At th e time t he BLAS T N analysis was run (May 7, 2010), the nr/nt database contained over 11 million sequences. Details of the parameters used in the BLASTN analysis are provided in Appendix B.

BLASTN analysis was conducted using the 1000 bp of corn genomic sequence flanking the

5 ʹ end of the 5307 T

- DNA insert as the query sequence. The search identified all alignments to sequences in the nr/nt database with search results yielding an E

- value of 10 or

lower. This analysis was repeated using the 1000 bp of corn geno mic sequence flanking the

3 ʹ end of the 5307 T

- DNA as the query sequence

. The E

- value , or “expectation value,” is a measure of the probability that matches between sequences occurred by chance. Search results involving comparisons between nucleotide s equences with highly similar sequences yield E

- values approaching zero

. T he probability that sequence similarities occurred by chance increases with higher E

- values (Ponting, 2001).

Using the results of each BLASTN query, t he 20 a lignments with the lowest E

- values were examined for this analysis. The corn genomic sequences flanking the 5 ʹ region and the 3 ʹ

reg ion of the 5307 corn insert aligned to multiple bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)

corn sequences that were annotated as various corn chromosome numbers ( i.e., corn5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 75 of 211 

### chromosome numbers 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10). This suggests that the 5307 corn insert is located in a repetitive region of the corn genome. Both flanking sequences aligned to NCBI

nucleotide database accession numbers AY53095 0.1, AY530951.1 and AY530952.1

, which were annotated as containing gene sequences. However, the regions of AY530950.1, AY530951.1, and AY530952.1 that were similar to the corn genomic sequences flanking the

5 ʹ region and the 3 ʹ region of the 5307 insert w ere not annotated as a gene. Both flanking

sequence s also aligned to accession numbers AY664416.1, AY664413.1, AY664419.1, and

AY664415.1

. ( However, alignments of corn genomic sequence flanking the 3 ′ region of the

5307 insert to accession numb ers AY664419.1 and AY664415.1 were not among those with the 20 highest similarity scores. ) These accession numbers are all annotated as containing

sequence s of various genes and repeat regions. However, the regions of AY664416.1, AY664413.1, AY664419.1, and AY664415.1 that were similar to the corn genomic sequences flanking the 5 ʹ region and the 3 ʹ region of the 5307 insert were not annotated as a

gene. The corn genomic sequences flanking the 5 ʹ region and the 3 ʹ region of the 5307 insert aligned to a region of AY664413.1 that was annotated as repeat region Giepumx19002_LTR retrotransposon. Additionally

, short regions of both flanking sequences ( i.e., ~20 to 40 base pairs in length) aligned to multiple regions of multiple sequences in the database. Some of these regions were also annotated as repeat regions in accession numbers AY664416.1, AY664413.1, AY664419.1, and AY664415.1. These repeat regions were also associated with retrotransposons. Approximately 49 to 78% of the

corn genome is suggested to be compris ed of retrotransposons (San Miguel and Bennetzen

, 1998). However, only approximately 5% of the retrotransposon sequences in the corn genome are predicted to produce proteins (Meyers et al.

, 2001). Because retrotranposons are repetitive, the repeat regions that align to corn genomic sequences flanking the 5 ʹ region

and the 3 ʹ region of the 5307 insert are likely to be repeated elsewhere in the corn genome.

BLASTN analysis indicated that the corn genomic sequence flanking the 3 ′ region of the

5307 corn insert is also similar to accession number EU954153.1, which was annotated as a hypothetical protein mRNA sequence from Zea mays

. The region of the flanking sequence that is similar to EU954153.1 was located 109 bp downstream of the genome

- to

- insert junction. BLASTN analysis also indicate d that the corn genomic sequence flanking the 3 ′ region of the 5307 corn insert is similar to accession number EZ054274.1, annotated as

mRNA sequence from Zea mays

. The region of the flanking sequence that is simila r to
EZ054274.1 was located 376 bp downstream of the genome

- to

- insert junction. The corn genomic sequence flanking the 5 ʹ region of the 5307 corn insert did not align to sequence
EU954153.1 or EZ054274.1. None of the alignments retrieved indicate s that a known endogenous corn gene was interrupted by the Event 5307 T

- DNA insert

.

A comparison of the sequence of the genomic insertion site from nontransgenic maize (inbred line NP2222) with the genomic sequences flanking the 5307 corn T

- DNA insert

dete rmined that 33 bp of corn genomic sequence were deleted when the 5307 insert integrated into the corn genome.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 76 of 211 V.G. Analysis of Putative Open Reading Frames Spanning the Genome to Insert

Junction



### The Vector NTI AdvanceTM program, version 10.3.0, was used to identify any putative open reading frames (ORFs) that span the junctions between the corn genomic sequence and the

5307 corn T

- DNA insert. For this analysis, putative ORFs were defined as DNA sequences in any reading frame that are contained between a putative start codon (ATG) and a putative stop codon (TAG, TAA, or TGA), and have a minimum translation size of 30 amino acids. This analysis identified one putative ORF of 243 bp; it spanned the junction between the

corn genomic sequence and the 3 ʹ regio n of the 5307 corn insert

. This putative ORF was identified solely by bioinformatic analysis; there is no evidence that it results in the production of a corresponding protein.

Bioinformatic analyses demonstrated that the translated 81

- amino

- acid sequence of this putative ORF had no significant sequence similarity to known or putative toxins or allergens. The methods used for these toxin and allergen similarity searches are desc ribed in Appendix B.

V

. H

. Summary of the Genetic Characterization of Event 5307 Corn



### Southern blot analyses demonstrate that Event 5307 corn (1) contains, at a single locus

within the corn genome, a single copy each of the gene ecry3.1Ab , its CMP promoter sequence, the marker gene pmi , its ZmUbiInt promoter sequence, and the two expected copies of the NOS terminator sequence, one NOS terminator sequence regulating ecry3.1Ab and one NOS terminator sequence regulating pmi ; (2) does not cont ain any extraneous DNA fragments of these functional elements inserted elsewhere in the corn genome; (3) and does

not contain plasmid backbone sequence from the transformation plasmid, pSYN12274.

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the entire Event 5307 insert confirms that the insert is intact and that the organization of the functional elements within the insert is identical to their organization within pSYN12274. One nucleotide change compared to the sequence of pSYN12274 was identified 48 base pairs (bp) u pstream of the CMP promoter in a

non coding region of the insert in Event 5307 corn . However, this nucleotide change had no effect on the functionality of the insert. Additionally, the analysis indicates that some truncation of the nucleotide sequence occ urred at the 5 ′ and 3 ′ ends of the T

- DNA during the transformation process that resulted in Event 5307 corn ; such truncation occurs commonly

in transformation via Agrobacterium . The entire RB and three bp of non coding sequence at

the 5 ′ end of the insert, and eight bp of the LB were truncated; however, these deletions had no effect on the functionality of the insert.

Sequence analysis of the Event 5307 insertion site demonstrates that 3 3 bp of corn genomic sequence were deleted when the Event 5307 insert integrated into the corn genome. BLAST N analyses comparing the corn genomic sequence flanking the Event 5307 insert to sequences in public databases indicate that the insert does not disrupt any known endogenous corn gene.

A putative 243

- bp novel open r eading frame (ORF) spanning the junction between corn genomic sequence and the 3 ′ region of the 5307 corn insert was identified. The translated5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 77 of 211 

### 81

- amino

- acid sequence encoded by the putative ORF was screened for amino acid sequence similarity to known or putative allergens or toxins. Comparisons to the FARRP AllergenOnline database indicate that the amino acid translation of the identified putative ORF shows no biologically relevant amino acid sequence similarity to any known or putative protein allergens. Additionally, the results of a comprehensive amino acid similarity s earch of the NCBI Entrez® Protein Database indicate that the amino acid translation of the identified putative ORF shows no biologically relevant amino acid sequence similarity to any known or putative toxins. T hese data collectively demonstrate

that ther e are no deleterious changes in the 5307 corn genome as a result of the T

- DNA

insertion.

The ecry3.1Ab and pmi segregation ratios over several generations of Event 5307 corn plants are consistent with linkage of these transgenes at a single locus in the c orn nuclear genome. These data and the results from Southern blot analyses of multiple generations of

Event 5307 corn indicate that the transgenic locus is stably inherited during conventional breeding.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 78 of 211 

### V I . Cha racterization of the eCry3.1Ab and PMI Prot eins



### The eCry3.1Ab and PMI proteins produced in Event 5307 corn have been characterized and tested to determine their potential for causing adverse effects in humans, livestock and

wildlife

. This process included an assessment of the : 1 ) origin and funct ion of each protein;

2 ) mode of action of each protein ; 3 ) physi c ochemical properties of the proteins ; 4 ) biological activity of the proteins ; and 5 ) potential toxicity of each protein . The

concentrations of eCry3.1Ab and PMI in 5307 corn tissues were also determined for use in

risk assessment

.

V I .A. eCry3.1Ab

– Origin

, Mode of Action , and Insecticidal Specificity



### The Cry (crystal) proteins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis share structural similarities ; thus , chimeric Cry genes can be engineered via the exchange of domains that are homologous between different Cry genes. As described in Table IV

- 1 , Figure IV

- 1, and Walters et al. (2010) , the eCry3.1Ab 1 

### protein in Event 5307 represents a chimeric protein

com prised of portions of two B

. - thuringiensis

- derived crystal proteins, modified Cry3A (mCry3A) and Cry1Ab. Additionally there are 22 amino acids at the N

- terminus of eCry3.1Ab that are not derived from a Cry protein, per se , but were the result of a PCR

ind uced mutation that resulted in a reading

- frame shift in the nucleotide sequence of a portion of the gene mcry3A . Following the 22 N

- terminal amino acids, there are 459 consecutive amino acids from mCry3A , followed by 172 consecutive amino acids from Cry1A b at the C

- terminus , resulting in a total eCry3.1Ab polypeptide of 653 amino acids

with a molecular weight of 73.7 kDa

.

The mCry3A protein is a modified form of the native Cry3A produced by B. thuringiensis subsp

. tenebrionis , and is present in Syngenta’s coleopteran

- resistant Event MIR604 corn
, which was deregulated by APHIS in 2007 (in response to APHIS Petition 04

- 362

- 01p)

. Cry1Ab is a native protein produced by B. thuringiensis subsp. HD

- 1. A truncated version

of this protein is present in Syngenta’s lepidopteran

- resistant Event Bt11 corn , which was deregulated by APHIS in 1996 (in response to APHIS Petition 95

- 195

- 01p). T he native

forms of both Cry3A and Cry1Ab are present in U.S. EPA

- registered microbial B. thuringie nsis insecticide products for coleopteran and lepidopteran control, respectively.

As an engineered chimeric protein, eCry3.1Ab has similarities to other well characterized Cry proteins. The spectrum of insecticidal activity of a ny individual Cry prote in is quite

narrow. Any given Cry protein is typically active against only a few species within a phylogenic Order. The specificity of each B. t huringiensis Cry protein is the result of the efficiency of the necessary steps involved in producing an activ e protein toxin and its subsequent interaction with the epithelial cells in the insect midgut. To exert their

insecticidal activity , most known B. t huringiensis Cry proteins must: (1) be ingested by the

1 The descriptor “eCry3.1Ab” was assigned by Syngenta; the “e” denotes that it was engineered, and the

“ Cry3” and “1Ab” descriptors relate to the respective source Cry (crystal) proteins, modified Cry3A (mCry3A) and Cry1Ab. The eCry3.1Ab protein has not bee n assigned an official Cry protein designation under the

formal nomenclature scheme for B. thuringiensis Cry proteins (Crickmore et al., 2010).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 79 of 211 

### insect and solubilized in the insect gut, (2) be activated by specific proteolytic cleavage by midgut enzymes , (3) bind to specific receptors on the surface of the insect midgut and (4)

form ion channels in the gut membrane . The completion of all these four processes results in disruption o f the normal function of the midgut leading to the death of the insect. The eCry3.1Ab protein exhibits the same behavior as other coleopteran

- active B. t huringiensis Cry proteins, including alkaline solubility, cleavage by chymotrypsin, specificity of bru sh border membrane binding and ion channel formation (Walters et al., 2010 )

. The mode of

action of eCry3.1Ab

, like that of most other Cry proteins

, is highly specific to insects and is

not operable in mammalian or other vertebrate species.

As indicated b y the insect activity profile in Table VIII

- 1 and the results of additional tests on multiple nontarg et organisms (described in Part VIII of this Petition) , eCry3.1Ab is not

active on species outside the Chrysomelidae family of Coleoptera. It demonstrates no lepidopteran activity , despite containing sequences from a lepidopteran

- active protein ( Cry1Ab )

.

V I .A.1 . Characterization of eCry3.1Ab



### A number o f analytic al methods were used to characterize the eCry3.1Ab protein produced

in 5307 corn plants

. Significant quantities of eCry3.1Ab were required to conduct

mammalian and environmental safety studies with the protein . Because it was not feasible to extract the required quantities of eCry3.1Ab from 5307 plants for this safety testing program, eCry3.1 Ab was produced in a recombinant E

. coli fermentation system and purified in active form

. B iochemical and bioactivity analyses were then conducted to establish the equivalence of the microbially produced eCry3.1Ab to eCry3.1Ab as produced in 5307 plants, to justify use of the microbially produced material as a surrogate for testing

purposes.

VI .A.1

. a. Production of eCry3.1Ab for Safety Testing


### Syngenta undertook extensive efforts to produc e the identical eCry3.1Ab protein in 5307 plants via microbial production systems. However, these efforts did not yield sufficient quantities of bioactive protein, and it proved necessary to produce eCry3.1Ab with an N

terminal tag of histidine residues as a purification aid. This is a com mon procedure for protein synthesis and purification

. Except for an N

- terminal tag consisting of one methionine and six histidine residues, the microbially produced eCry3.1Ab has the identical amino acid sequence as eCr y3.1Ab produced in 5307 plants. The amino acid sequence of the plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab can be deduced from the observation that the nucleotide sequence of ecry3.1Ab recovered from 5307 plants is identical to the intended sequence (see

Part V. A. Nucleotide Sequence of the T

- DNA Insert)

.

T he microbially produced eCry3.1Ab is hereafter also referred to a s the eCry3.1Ab test substance, or by its batch code, ECRY3.1AB

- 0208. The eCry3.1Ab test substance was determined by spectrophotometric analysis to contain 92.4% protein, and densitometric

a nalysis indicated that 97.0% of the total protein in the test substance was eCry3.1Ab. Thus, the purity of test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was calculated to be 89.6% eCry3.1Ab by weight. The molecular weight of eCry3.1Ab in the test substance was 74,833 Da as measured by mass spectrometry ; this was consistent with the predicted molecular weight

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 80 of 211 

### The production and characterization of test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 are described in Appendix C.

VI .A.1

. b. Equivalence of eCry3.1Ab in Test Substance and in 5307 Plants


### To justify the use of the eCry3.1Ab test substance as a suitable surrogate for eCry3.1Ab produced in 5307 plants, the proteins were compared biochemically and functionally. Both sources of eCry3.1Ab were compared with re gard to their molecula r weight, integrity (intactness), immunoreactivity against an antibody capable of detecting eCry3.1Ab, glycosylation status , and insecticidal activity against a sensitive species

. Additionally, N

terminal sequence analysis and peptide mass mapping were do ne to confirm the identity of both proteins. The genotypes of the 5307 and control plants used in this study were NP2171

× NP2460 (BC5F 3 

### ) (5307) and NP2171 × NP2460 , respectively. ( See also Table III

- 1 and the breeding pedigree diagram in Figure III

- 3.) T he plants used for this study were grown in a Syngenta greenhouse facility.

The eCry3.1Ab protein s from 5307 corn plants and microbially produced test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 had apparent molecular weights consistent with the predicted molecular weights of 73.7 and 74.8 kDa, respectively, and immunologically cross

- reacted with antibodies capable of de tecting the eCry3.1Ab protein. There was no evidence of post

translational glycosylation of eCry3.1Ab from either the 5307 plants or the microbially produced test substance. N

- terminal sequence analysis and peptide mass mapping confirmed the identity of eCry3.1Ab from both sources. B oth the plant

- produced and microbially produced eCry3.1Ab showed comparable insecticidal activity against Colorado potato beetle larvae 2 

### ( Leptinotarsa decemlineata ) , as indicated by the 144

- hour LC 50 

### values

in Table VI

- 1

. Th ese results confirm that the addition of one methionine and six histidine

residues at the N

- terminus in microbially produced eCry3.1Ab does not affect the function of eCry3.1Ab.

2 Although L

. decemlineata is not a corn rootworm, it is a member of the same family of Coleoptera (Chrysomeli dae) as are the Diabrotica rootworms and is sensitive to eCry3.1Ab, a s indicated in Table VIII

- 1.

L

. decemlineata larvae were used for this study because they are more amenable than rootworms to laboratory bioassays.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 81 of 211 Table VI

- 1. Comparison of Colorado potato beetle larvae LC 50

First instars were exposed to diets containing eCry3.1Ab from 5307 plants or ECRY3.1AB

- 0208. Leaf extract from control plants was included in the bioassays with ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 to control for leaf matrix effects. Details of these bioassays are provided in Appendix C. For each replicate assay, N = 24 larvae per treatment. values for eC ry3.1Ab from 5307 plants and test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.

Replicate LP5307 a LP

- NEG b + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208

μg eCry3.1Ab/ml insect diet

LC 50 95% CI LC 50 95% CI

#1 1.316 0.631

- 3.187 1.780 0.924

- 3.19 0

#2 1.669 0.875

- 3.279 1.113 0.113

- 4.001

#3 2.888 1.765

- 4.655 3.226 1.955

- 5.134

a Leaf protein extract of 5307 plants containing eCry3.1Ab

. b Leaf protein extract of control plants, tested in combination with eCry3.1Ab from test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.



### These characterization and bioactivity results support the conclusion that eCry3.1Ab produced in recombinant E. coli (test substance ECRY3.1A B

- 0208) is biochemically and functionally equivalent to the eCry3.1Ab produced in Event 5307 corn plants

. These data support the use of eCry3.1Ab in test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 as a suitable surrogate for eCry3.1Ab produced in 5307 corn for safety testi ng purposes

. Appendix C provides further

details of the methods and the results for these analyses of biochemical and functional equivalence.

V I .A.2 . Safety Assessment for eCry3.1Ab


### A mammalian safety data package was reviewed by the U.S. EPA in connection with the approval of the current Experimental Use Permit for 5307 corn, which was granted in June

2010 (67979

- EUP

- 8) . Effective June 16, 2010, EPA established a temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for eCry3.1Ab residues in corn commodities, pursuant to §408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §346a(d) (EPA, 2010a ; 40 CFR § 174.532 ). Syngenta will soon petition the EPA to convert this tempor ary tolerance exemption to a permanent exemption, in connection with an application for FIFRA Section 3 registration of the eCry3.1 Ab protein in 5307 corn. An assessment of human and animal safety of the eCry3.1Ab protein will be submitted to the U.S. FDA in December

2010 in connection with a premarket consultation.

The conclusions of the safety assessment for eCry3.1Ab are summarized below.

1. The donor organism for the source genes used to create ecry3.1Ab is Bacillus thuringiensis , a ubiquitous soil ba cterium. Insecticidal Cry proteins from B. thuringiensis , including the source proteins from which eCry3.1Ab was engineered, have a long history of safe use in food crops. Their modes of action are highly s pecific within

narrow range s of related insect s pecies , and are not relevant to mammals or other

vertebrates. Additionallly, b acteria are not known to be sources of allergenic proteins (Taylor and Hefle, 2001; FAO/WHO, 2001 )

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 82 of 211 

### 2. Bioinformatic analyses showed that t he eCry3.1Ab amino acid sequence (653 amino acids) has no significant sequence similarity to any toxins

, other than other Cry proteins (also identified as δ

- endotoxins or insecticidal crystal proteins in the search results). This comparison was conducted using the latest posting of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Ent rez® Protein Database (NCBI

, 2010 b ) , and searching th e database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for Proteins (BLASTP) program 3



### 3. The eCry3.1Ab protein is not acute ly toxic to mice when administered orally at a very high dose, 2000 mg/kg body weight. (See study summary in Part VIII.D.2.) (Altschul et al., 1997).

4. The eCry3.1Ab protein is rapidly degraded in simulated gastric fluid containing pepsin at pH 1.2 . No intact eCry3.1Ab or eCry3. 1Ab

- derived fragments were immunologically

detectable by Western blot analysis after 30 seconds of exposure to simulated gastric

fluid

. In simulated intestinal fluid containing pancreatin, intact eCry3.1Ab was readily degraded within one minute, but small er fragments of the protei n remained undegraded following a 48

- hour exposure. This behavior in simulated intestinal fluid is a common feature of Cry proteins. Additional intestinal proteases not present in pancreatin are involved in protein digestion in vivo , and would be expected to further degrade any fragments of eCry3.1Ab as part of normal digestive processes in mammals

.
5. Bioinformatic analyses showed that the eCry3.1Ab amino acid sequence has no significant similarity to the sequences of known or puta tive allergens in the current posting of the Food Allergy Research and Resource Program (FARRP) AllergenOnline database, version 10.0 (FARRP, 2010). Sequential 80

- amino

- acid peptides of the eCry3.1Ab sequence were compared to the protein sequences in the Allergen Online database using the FASTA search algorit hm 4



### 6. The eCry3.1Ab protein is inactivated by heating at temperatures of of 95oC and above

. (Pearson and Lipman, 1988). Additionally, the eCry3.1Ab sequence was also examined for matches of eight contiguous amino acids ( Hileman et al., 2002) with any allergen sequences

, to screen for short, local regions of amino acid identity that might indicate the presence of common T

- cell binding epitopes.

7. The eCry3.1Ab protein is not glycosylated . (See Appendix C. )

8. A standard weight

- of

- evidence analysis for allergenic potential (Codex, 2009) indicates that eCry3.1Ab is unlikely to be a food allergen and is unlikely to be cross

- reactive to known allergens

.

3 BLASTP version 2.2.8 was used with the following parameters: no complexity filter; expectation score = 10; word size = 3; gap costs: existence = 11 and extension = 1. The similarity matrix was Blocks Substitution Matrix62 (BLOSUM62).

4 FASTA version 3 .45 was used with the following parameters: extension penalty of 2 and gap creation penalty of 12. The scoring matrix was the Blocks Substitution Matrix 50 (BLOSUM50).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 83 of 211 V I .B. P hosphomannose Isomerase

– Ori gin and Function



### Event 5307 corn plants express the gene pmi (also knows as manA ) from E. coli strain K

- 12 (Miles and Guest, 1984). This gene encodes the enzyme phosphomannose isomerase ( PMI ) that catalyzes the reversible conversion of mannose 6

- phosphate and fructose 6

- phosphate and enables many microorganisms to utilize mannose as a carbon and energy source. PMI

enzymes are ubiquitous in nature, and are essential for many organisms, includi ng humans. The purpose of PMI in 5307 corn was as a selectable marker; it does not have agronomic utility , e.g., it does not confer herbicide tolerance

.

V I .B.1

. Mechanism of Action



### PMI has utility as a selectable marker for transformation of many plant species (Bojsen et al., 1994; Joersbo, et al., 1998; Negrotto et al., 2000). Plant cells that have been transformed with the gene pmi are able to survive and grow on media containing mannose as the only or primary energ y source

. When placed in med ium co ntaining mannose as the sole or primary sugar source, nontransformed tissue remains dormant and becomes outgrown by

transformed tissue. Mannose itself is not toxic to plant cells. Inclusion of pmi in the T

DNA of transformation plasmid pSYN12274 allowed for selection of successfully

transformed corn plantlets.

V I .B.2. Characterization of P hosphomannose Isomerase


### A number of analytical methods were used to characterize the PMI protein produced in 5307 corn plants. Significant quantities of PMI were required to conduct mammalian safety studies with the protein. Because it was not feasible to extract the required quantities of

PMI from 5307 plants for this safety testing program, PMI was produced in a recombinant

E. coli fermentation system and purified in active form. Biochemical and bioactivity analyses were then conducted to establish the equivalence of the microbially produced PMI

to PMI as produced in 5307 plants, to justify use of the microbially produced mater ial as a surrogate for testing purposes.

VI .B.1

. a. Production of PMI for Safety Testing



### PMI test substance was produced in recombinant E. coli by over

- expressing the same pmi gene that was introduced into 5307 corn . The gene pmi ( manA ) from E. coli strain K

- 12 was cloned into the inducible, over

- expression pET

- 24a vector and transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3)RP. The PMI protein as encoded in this vector was identical in amino acid sequence to that encoded b y the vector used to produce 5307 co rn

.

E. coli cell pellets were ruptured in 25 mM Tris

- HCl (pH 7.5) and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The PMI present in the supernatant was purified with protamine sulfate precipitation followed by anion exchange chromatography using a Q Sepharose FF column. PMI was eluted from the column using a NaCl gradient, concentrated and subjected to gel filtration using a Superdex

- 200 column and 50 mM NH 4 

### HCO 3 

### (pH 8.0) buffer. Fractions containing PMI were pooled, frozen and lyophilized. The ly ophilized PMI sample preparation was designated test substance PMI

- 0105. This test substance was determined by spectrophotometric analysis to contain 89.9% protein, and densitometric analysis indicated that 99.6% of the total protein in the test substance was PMI. Thus the5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 84 of 211 

### purity of test substance PMI

- 0105 was calculated to be 89.5% PMI by weight. The predicted PMI molecular weight of 42.8 kDa was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Western blot analysis of test substance PMI

- 0105 revealed a dominant immuno reactive band corresponding to the expected PMI molecular weight. N

- terminal sequencing confirmed that the first 15 amino acids of the test protein corresponded to the predicted N

- terminal sequence of PMI.

VI .B.1

. b. Equivalence of PMI in Test Substance and in 5307 Plants


### A series of analytical methods were used to characterize the PMI protein produced in 5307

corn and to demonstrate that a PMI test substance (PMI

- 0105) produced in recombinant E.

coli is a suitable surrogate for use in food and feed safe ty studies. The genotypes of the 5307 and control plants used in this study were NP2171 × NP2460 (BC5F 3 

### ) (5307) and NP2171 × NP2460, respectively. (See also Table III

- 1 and the breeding pedigree diagram in Figure III

- 3.) The plants used for this study were grown in a Syngenta greenhouse facility.

The identities of both the plant

- produced and microbially produced PMI proteins were confirmed by apparent molecular weight, immunoreactivity, and enzymatic activity. Plant

produced and microbially produced P MI proteins were demonstrated to have the predicted molecular weights of approximately 42.8 kDa and both immunologically cross

- reacted with

the same anti

- PMI antibodies, as determined by Western blot analysis, thus confirming the identity and integrity of the PMI proteins from both sources. It was also confirmed that both sources of PMI proteins catalyzed the same chemica l reaction 5



### Based on these results, the identities of the plant

- and microbially produced PMI proteins were verified and it can be concluded that the PMI produced in 5307 corn and recombinant

E. coli are biochemically and functionally equivalent. Therefore, the microbially produced

PMI , as contained in test substance PMI

- 0105, is a suitable surrogate for PMI expressed in

5307 corn for use in safety studies

. A more detailed description of the methods and results for this protein characterization work can be f ound in Appendix C. and had similar specific activity of 455.67 U/mg PMI for the plant

- produced PMI and 526.26 U/mg PMI for the microbially produ ced PMI.

V I .B.3. Safety Assessment for Phosphomannose Isomerase


### Based on its safety profile, t he U.S. EPA has established a permanent exemption from the requirement of food or feed tolerances for phosphomannose isomerise (PMI) in all crops (EPA , 2007; 40 CFR §174.527). PMI is also present as a selectable marker in two other Syngenta corn events that have been deregulated by APHIS, namely MIR604 corn (for rootworm control) and MIR162 corn (for lepidopteran control). An updated assessment of

hum an and animal safety of PMI will be submitted to the U.S. FDA in December 2010 in connection with a premarket consultation for 5307 corn

.

5 One unit (U) of PMI activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to catalyze the conversion of 1 μmol of mannose 6

- phosphate to fructose 6

- phosphate per minute (equivalent to 1 μmol NADP reduced per min). Reaction: Mannose 6

- P (catalyzed by PMI)  Fructose 6

- P (catalyzed by phosphoglucose isomerase)
 Glucose 6

- P +NADP (catalyzed by glucose 6

- P dehydrogenase)  6

- Gluconolactone + NADPH5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 85 of 211 

### The conclusions of the safety assessment for PMI are summarized below.

1. The source of the gene pmi is E. coli strain K

- 12, a non

- pathogenic strain of this ubiquitous bacterium. The PMI protein encoded by this gene has a nontoxic mode of action. PMI enzymes serve an essential function in many organisms, including humans.

B acteria are not known to be sources of allergenic proteins (Taylor and Hefle, 2001; FAO/WHO, 2001).

2. Bioinformatic analyses showed that the PMI amino acid sequence ( 391 amino acids) has no significant sequence similarity to any toxins

. This comparison was conducted using the latest posting of t he National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Entrez® Protein Database (NCBI, 2010b), and searching the database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for Proteins (BLASTP) program 6



### 3. PMI (as test substance PMI

- 0105 , containing 89.5 % PMI by weight) wa s not acutely toxic to mice when administered orally at a very high dose, 2000 mg PMI /kg body weight

. There were no mortalities and no adverse clinical signs of toxicity in mice

treated with PMI and observed for 14 days . There were no adverse test substance

related effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology, organ weights, macroscopic pathology or microscopic pathology. In 1998, a previous PMI acute oral toxicity study was conducted using test substan ce PMI

- 0198 (60% PMI by weight), in which the mice received 3030 mg PMI/kg and were observed for 14 days. This study evaluated a more condensed list of parameters than the acute toxicity study utilizing test

substance PMI

- 0105, and examined organ weights of the liver, spleen, kidneys and brain

. Similarly, however, t here were no mortalities due to ingestion of the test substance, no adverse clinical signs of toxicity , no effects on body weight, and no effects on organ weights in mice treated with PMI

- 0198

. This 1998 toxicity study was used to support the permanent tolerance exemption granted for PMI (EPA, 2007). (Altschul et al., 1997).

4. PMI is rapidly degraded in simulated gastric fluid containing pepsin at pH 1.2. No intact PMI or degradation products were visible on the Western blot following one minute of exposure to simulated gastric fluid

. In simulated intestinal fluid containing pancreatin,

t he majority of intact PMI was digested within 5 minutes and no intact PMI or degradation products were detected by Western blot analys is upon sampling of the

reaction mixture after 15 minutes.

5. Bioinformatic analyses showed that the PMI amino acid sequence has no biologically relevant similarity to the sequences of known or putative allergens in the current posting of FARRP AllergenOnline database, version 10.0 (FARRP, 2010). Sequential 80

- amino

- acid peptides of the PMI sequence were compared to the protein sequences in the Allergen Online database using the FASTA search algorithm 7

6 BLASTP version 2.2.8 was used with the following parameters: no complexity filter; expectation score = 10; word size = 3; gap costs: existence = 11 and extension = 1. The similarity matrix was Blocks Substitution Matrix62 (BLOSUM62). 

### (Pearson and Lipman,

7 FASTA version 3.45 was used with the following parameters: extension penalty of 2 and gap creation penalty of 12. The scor ing matrix was the Blocks Substitution Matrix 50 (BLOSUM50).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 86 of 211 

### 1988). Additionally, the PMI sequen ce was also examined for matches of eight contiguous amino acids (Hileman et al., 2002) with any allergen sequences, to screen for short, local regions of amino acid identity that might indicate the presence of common T

cell binding epitopes. As previousl y identified, there was one sequence identity match of eight contiguous identical amino acids between PMI and a known allergen, α

parvalbumin from Rana species CH2001 (unidentified edible frog) ( Hilger et al., 2002).

Further investigation using IgE

- specif ic serum screening methodology (C odex , 2009)

demonstrated no cross

- reactivity between PMI and the allergen α

- parvalbumin, using serum from the single individual known to have demonstrated IgE

- mediated allergy to this specific α

- parvalbumin. The allergic p atient’s serum IgE did not recognize any portion of PMI as an allergenic epitope. These results support the conclusion that the eight

- amino

- acid sequence identity between the PMI protein and α

- parvalbumin from

Rana species CH2001 is not biologically relev ant and has no implications for the potential cross

- reactivity between PMI and α

- parvalbumin. Therefore, the short sequence identity match with α

- parvalbumin has no implications for the potential allergenicity of PMI.

6. PMI is inactivated by heating at tem peratures of of 65oC and above.

7. PMI is predicted not to be glycosylated in 5307 corn. The same PMI protein is not glycosylated in other transgenic corn cultivars.

8. A standard weight

- of

- evidence analysis for allergenic potential (Codex, 2009) indicates that PMI is unlikely to be a food allergen and is unlikely to be cross

- reactive to known allergens

.

V I

. C. eCry3.1Ab and PMI Concentrations in 5307 Corn



### The concentrations of the eCry3.1Ab and PMI proteins in various 5307 plant tissues were quantified us ing enzyme

- linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA )

. The tissues analyzed were

l eaves, roots, and whole plants at four growth stages ( whorl, ant hesis, maturity and senescence), kernels at two stages (maturity and senescence) and pollen. T issues were

collected from a 5307 corn hybrid and a nontransgenic, near

- isogenic control hybrid grown concurrently according to local agronomic practices and sampled at four US Corn Belt

locations in 2008 . The genotypes of the plants used in these studies were NP2171 ×

NP2460 ( BC5F 3



### At each location, ten plants of the 5307 hybrid were collected at each sampling stage. Five of these plants were retained as whole

- plant samples

, and individual tissues were collected from the remaining five plants. P ollen was collected from at least 10 plants and pooled to create a single composite sample per location. Each pollen sample was air

- dried and sieved to remove nonpollen debris (e.g., anthers and aphids)

. Tissues were also collected from nontransgenic control plants to assess the impact, if any, of the plant matrices on the ELISA. All plant tissue samples were shipped overnig ht on ice to Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc., where they were stored at

- 80°C ± 10°C until processed for analysis. Details of the tissue processing, extraction, and ELISA method s are provided in Appendix D. ) (5307) and NP2171 × NP2460, respectively, as also indicated in Table III

- 1 and Figure III

- 3. These plants were grown under USDA APHIS notification 08

- 051

- 104n

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 87 of 211 

### T he mean tissue and whole

- plant concentrations of e Cry3.1Ab and PMI across all four

locations were determined on a fresh

- weight and dry

- weight basis ( Tables VI

- 2 and VI

- 3 ). Except where noted, all values were corrected for extraction efficiency. Where the

measured concentrations were below the lower limi t of quantit ation (< LOQ) or the limit of detection (< LOD), the respective LOQs and LODs are indicated on the data tables.

On a fresh

- weight basis, t he concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in individual sampl es across all locations and plant stages ranged from < LOQ to 71.21 μg/g in leaves, 0.40 μg/g to 9.29 μg/g in roots , 1.60 μg/g to 7.29 μg/g in kernels, < LOQ to 0.09 μg/g in pollen and 1.70 μg/g to 28.64 μg/g in whole plants (Table VI

- 2 ). On a fresh

- weigh t basis, the concentrations of PMI in individual samples across all locations and plant stages ranged from < LOD to 1.66 μg/g in leaves, < LOQ to 1.07 μg/g in roots, 0.50 μg/g to 2.38 μg/g in kernels, 5.16 μg/g to 6.06 μg/g in pollen and 0.15 μg/g to 2.13 μg/g in whole plants (Table VI

- 3 ).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 88 of 211 Table VI

- 2 . Mean tissue concentr ations of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 plants

. Tissue c oncentrations are presented on a fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) basis. Low eCry3.1Ab concentrations in pollen precluded the determi nation of method extraction efficiency for this tissue; all other

ELISA results are corrected for extraction efficiency

. Control plant tissues had no detectable eCry3.1Ab.

Tissue Type Whorl Anthesis Maturity Senescence

eCry3.1Ab μg/g fresh weight (r ange)

Leaves 23.75 1 (16.81

– 33.80) 20.23 (13.83

– 27.59) 25.33 (0.89

– 71.21 ) ( < LOQ 2

– 20.29 )

Roots 5.54 (3.67

– 9.29) 3.27 (1.88

– 5.99) 2.98 (1.02

– 5.97) 2.73 (0.40

– 7.81)

Kernels N/A N/A 3 4.56 (1.60

– 7.29) 3.24 (2.38

– 4.66)

Pollen N/A < LOQ

– 0.09 N/A N/A

Whole Plant s 15.78 (11.41

– 28.64) 8.11 (3.10

– 13.12) 8.86 (3.36

– 21.96) 3.60 (1.70

– 10.65)

eCry3.1Ab μg/g dry weight (r ange)

Leaves 142.96 1 (88.65

– 279.79) 84.34 (61.37

– 112.62) 49.04 (1.46

– 105.60) ( < LOQ

– 26.50 )

Roots 42.72 (30.47

– 69.66) 18.20 (12.39

– 29.59) 11.96 (3.18

– 22.25) 9.13 (1.40

– 21.74)

Kernels N/A N/A 6.19 (2.37

– 9.64) 4.45 (2.92

– 6.76)

Pollen N/A < LOQ

– 0. 10 N/A N/A

Whole Plants 111.08 (75.16

– 178.22) 38.14 (14.18

– 55.67) 16.03 (6.37

– 38.94) 8.27 (3.41

– 25.46)

1 Means were not calculated where the values for one or more plants were less than the lower limit of quantification (< LOQ); in such cases, only the range of values is shown

2 LOQ = 0.08 μg/g FW and 0.10 μg/g DW pollen; 0.02 μg/g FW and 0.10 μg/g DW leaves at senescence

3 N/A = not analyzed5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 89 of 211 Table VI

- 3

. Mean t issue c oncentrations of PMI in 5307 plants

. P lant tissue oncentrations are presented on a fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) basis. All ELISA results have been corrected for method extraction efficiency. Control plant tissues had no detectable PMI.

Tissue Type Whorl Anthesis Maturity Senescence

PMI μg/g fresh weight ( r ange)

Leaves 0.81 (0.59

– 1.13) 1 0.70 (0.43

– 1.28) (< LOQ 2 ( < LOD

– 1.66) 3

– 0.42)

Roots 0.28 (0.15

– 0.49) 1 0.31 (0.16

– 0.57) 0.45 (0.17

– 0.64) (< LOQ

– 1.07)

Kernels N/A N/A 4 1.36 ( 0.74

– 2.38 ) 0.82 ( 0.50

– 1.28 )

Pollen N/A 5.47 ( 5.16

- 6.06 ) N/A N/A

Whole Plant 0.62 ( 0.34

– 1.13 ) 0.93 ( 0.44

– 2.13 ) 0.96 ( 0.41

– 1.57 ) 0.43 ( 0.15

– 0.71 )

PMI μg/g dry weight (r ange)

Leaves 4.83 ( 2.97

– 8.33 ) 1 2.91 ( 1.74

– 5.20 ) ( < LOQ

– 3.50 ) ( < LOD

– 0.54 )

Roots 2.11 ( 1.30

– 3.75 ) 1 1.69 ( 0.97

– 3.13 ) 1.85 ( 0.92

– 2.88 ) ( < LOQ

– 3.02 )

Kernels N/A N/A 2.08 ( 1.04

– 3.82 ) 1.11 ( 0.70

– 1.62 )

Pollen N/A 6.51 ( 5.79

- 7.23 ) N/A N/A

Whole Plants 4.23 ( 2.59

– 7.69 ) 4.38 ( 2.00

– 8.83 ) 1.83 ( 0.68

– 2.56 ) 0.97 ( 0.39

– 2.02 )

1 Means were not calculated where the values for one or more plants were less than the lower limit of quantification (< LOQ) or the limit of detection (< LOD) ; in such cases, only the range of values are shown

2 LOQ = 0.03 μg/g FW and 0.06 μg/g DW leaves at maturity ; 0.03 μg/g FW and 0.10 μg/g DW roots at

senescence

3 LOD = 0.01 μg/g FW and DW leaves at senescence

4 N/A = not analyzed5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 90 of 211 

### V I I. Phenotypic and Compositional Evaluation



### Laboratory, greenhouse, growth chamber, and field investigations were conducted to assess the phenotype and biochemical composition of 5307 corn . The purpose of these investigations was to determine if unintended changes occurred in 5307 corn as a result of the transformation process and to determine if any unintended changes conferred a plant pest risk pote ntial to the new cultivar. Multiple ph enotypic and compositional endpoints were evaluated and compared between 5307 corn and nontrangenic near

- isogenic control corn

. For several assessments, additional nontransgenic corn varieties were also used for comparison.

VII.A. Phenotypic Assessment o f 5307 Plants



### A range of phenotypic parameters assessing seed germination and dormancy, growth characteristics, reproductive capability, seed dispersal, and interactions with abiotic stressors

and biotic stressors were examined for 5307 and control plants. Table VII

- 1 provides a listing of the parameters evaluated. The purpose of these evaluations was to ascertain

whether the transformation that created 5307 corn imparted a phenotypic characteristic that

could increase the environmental persistence of the new cultivar or result in invasive

characteristics. Persistence or invasiveness could be indicative of increased weediness potential and plant pest risk. If no significant differences in these characteristics are found

between 5307 cor n and nontransgen i c control corn , it supports the conclusion that 5307 corn does not have increased plant pest potential.

Table VII

- 1. Phenotypic characteristics evaluated for 5307 corn hybrids

. Evaluations were made in laboratory, greenhouse, growth cha mber, or field experiments.

Phenotypic
Characteristic Variable
Measured Timing 1 Description 1

Dormancy/
Germination Dormancy and germination After 4, 7, and 12 days Percent normal germinated, abnormal germinated, dead seed, firm swollen seed and hard seed

Emergence Early emergence vigor Before V3 stage Early emergence vigor rating recorded before 14 days after planting on a scale of 1

- 9, 1 being most vigorous

Emerged plants Stage V3 stage Number of emerged plants per plot

Vegetative
Growth Early growth vigor At or after V6 stage Early growth vigor rating recorded at or after V6 stage on a scale of 1

- 9, 1 being most vigorous

Early root lodging Before anthesis Percent plants per plot leaning greater than 30 degrees from vertical at the root prior to anthesis

Snapped plants Before anthesis Percent of plants per plot broken prior to anthesis due to adverse environmental conditions, such as high wind speeds5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 91 of 211 Table VII

- 1 ( C ontinued ) . Phenotypic characteristics evaluated for 5307 corn hybrids.

1 Plant stages described are as follows: V3 = 3

- leaf stage; V6 = 6

- leaf stage; R2 = kernel blister stage (10

- 14 days after silking); R4 = kernel dough stage (24

- 28 days after silking); R6 = physiologic maturity Phenotypic
Characteristic Variable
Measured Timing 1 Description 1

Vegetative
Growth (continued) Ear height After anthesis Ear height (cm) from base of plant to node where ear connects to plant. Data collected when plant is
between R2 and R6

Plant height After anthesis Plant height (cm) from base of plant to collar of flag leaf. Data collected when plant is between R2 and
R6

Leaf color rating After anthesis Leaf color rating collected between R4 and R6 stage of corn development; 5 = same as commercial check hybrid, 1 = darker, 9 = severely
chlorotic

Late season
intactness Harvest Rating of late

- season integrity of the plant above the ear; 1 = all plant parts intact at harvest; 9 = 100% of plants in the plot are broken at the ear
node prior to harvest

Late root lodging Harvest Percent plants per plot leaning greater than 30 °
from vertical at the root after anthesis

Push test Harvest Number of plants out of 10 plants tested that break the stalk or have root failure after pushing to 45 degrees from vertical

Stalk lodging Harvest Number of plants per plot with broken stalks below
the ear at harvest

Reproductive
Growth Heat units to 50% pollen shed Flowering Heat units to 50% of plants shedding pollen

Pollen viability Pollen shed Percent viable pollen based on staining
characteristics

Pollen morphology Pollen shed Diameter (μm) of viable pollen grains

Heat units to 50% silking Flowering Heat units to 50% of plants extruding silks

Plant population
at harvest Harvest Extrapolated estimate of plant harvest population (plants per acre)

Barren plants Harvest Number of plants per plot that do not develop an

ear

Grain moisture Harvest Percent grain moisture at harvest

Test weight Harvest Grain test weight (pounds/bushel) converted to
standard 15.5% moisture

Grain yield Harvest Grain yield (bushels/acre) converted to standard 15.5% grain moisture

Seed

Retention Dropped ears Prior to
harvest Number of plants per plot that have dropped a developed ear prior to harvest

Plant

ecological
Interactions Disease susceptibility Planting to
harvest Observations of occurrence of gray leaf spot or northern corn leaf blight disease on a 1

– 9 rating scale; 1 = no visible disease on plant, 9 = plant shows complete susceptibility to disease5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 92 of 211 VII.A.1. Seed Dormancy and Germination



### Enh anced germination or seed dormancy are characteristics that can be indicative of plant pest potential. Dormancy mechanisms are used to distribute seed germination across multiple growing seasons. Primary dormancy is conferred by physical traits, such as hard seeds, or physiological traits of the seed that prevent immediate germination under

conditions that would otherwise favor it

. Primary dormancy is extremely rare or nonexistent in most field crops, including corn (Galinat, 1988). Secondary dormancy o ccurs when the seed is capable of germination, but environmental conditions are unsuitable to induce germination. Overwintering of corn seed occurs via secondary dormancy.

A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the germination and dormancy characte ristics

of 5307 corn seed using a modification of the testing protocol established by the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA). Seed samples of two 5307 hybrids, their respective nontransgenic

, near

- isogenic controls, and three conventional hybrid s served as test, control, and reference materials, respectively, for the study. Table VII

- 2 shows the genotypes of the test, control, and reference hybrids . (S ee also Table III

- 1 and the breeding pedigree diagram

in Figure III

- 3

. )

Table VII

- 2. Event 5307, control, and reference seed varieties used in

seed germination and dormancy tests.

Hybrid Designation Variety

5307 Hybrid #1 NP217 1 × NP2460(5307)

Control Hybrid #1 NP217 1 × NP2460

5307 Hybrid #2 NP 2391 × NP2 222 (5307)

Control Hybrid #2 NP 2391 × NP2 222

Reference Hybrid #1 N69

- P9

Reference Hybrid #2 NX6176

Reference Hybrid #3 H

- 8991



### The study design followed that described by AOSA (2005a) for assessment of germination and dormancy characteristics of corn seed under optimal temperature conditions for seed germination (25°C and 20°C/30°C). Additionally, similar assessments were conducted under nonoptimal temperature conditions (5°C, 10°C, 10°C/20°C, and 10°C/30°C). Seed

lots were d ivided into four replica tes of 100 seeds per replicate per temperature regime. Six temperature regimes were utilized:

**•** constant temperatures: 5°C, 10°C, and 25°C

**•** alternating temperatures: 10°C/20°C, 10°C/30°C and 20°C/30°C5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 93 of 211 

### Experiments were conducted in unlighted temperature

- controlled growth chambers. For the alternating temperature regimes, the lower temperature was maintained for 16 hours and the higher temperature for 8 hours, and then the cycle was repeated. The study was initiated by rolling 100 seeds in moistened ger mination towels and then placing the rolled towels into the growth chambers.

For the tests carried out at 25°C and 20°C/30°C (the standard temperatures used in the AOSA method), each germination towel was carefully unrolled and examined four and

seven days after study initiation. Each seed was examined and categorized as one of the following:

**•** normal germinated (seed exhibited normal development of the root and shoot with a shoot length of at least 0.5 in (1.3 cm))

**•** abnormal germinated (seed lacked a we ll

- developed root and shoot, or possessed a hollow coleoptile, or exhibited mechanical damage)

**•** dead seed (seed not germinated and visibly deteriorated and soft to the touch)

**•** firm swollen seed (seed visibly swollen and firm to the touch)

**•** hard seed (seed tha t had not imbibed water and was firm to the touch)

For the tests carried out at the nonoptimal temperature regimes of 5°C, 10°C, 10/20°C, and 10/30°C, each germination towel was carefully unrolled and examined 4, 7, and 12 days after study initiation. Ea ch seed was examined and categorized as one of the following:

**•** germinated (seed with a radicle protruding beyond the seed coat)

**•** dead seed (seed not germinated and visibly deteriorated and soft to the touch)

**•** firm swollen seed (seed visibly swollen and firm to the touch)

**•** hard seed (seed that had not imbibed water and was firm to the touch)

At the end of each experiment, all firm swollen and hard seeds were subjected to a tetrazolium test to evaluate their viability (AOSA, 2005b). Seeds subjected to the

tetr azolium test were then categorized as ‘viable firm swollen,’ ‘viable hard,’ or ‘dead’ (nonviable firm swollen or nonviable hard). Viable hard seed are indicative of dormancy potential.

The results of these seed germination and dormancy experiments are su mmarized in Tables

VII

- 3 and VII

- 4. For each of the two 5307 hybrids and nontransgenic control hybrids, the data reported represent the combined data, averaged over four replicates, for observations at 4 and 7 days for the optimal temperature regimes and at 4, 7, and 12 days for the nonoptimal temperature regimes. For the three reference hybrids, the data reported represent the range in values across all four replicates per hybrid (12 total replicates).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 94 of 211 

### As shown in Tables VII

- 3 and VII

- 4, many of the data points for seed germination and dormancy approached or equaled 10 0% or 0%. Such data are not well suited to statistical comparison by analysis of variance because they do not satisfy the assumptions upon which the validity of an analysis of variance depends. Instead, an alternative method of statistical analysis was a pplied. F or each temperature regime, data for each 5307 hybrid was combined across replicates and compared to the corresponding data for its control hybrid using Fisher’s Exact Test. For the nonoptimal temperature regimes (5 o 

### C, 10 o 

### C, 10/20 o 

### C,

and 10/30 o 

### C )

, comparisons were made for the proportion of seeds classified as germinated (i.e., versus the sum of viable firm swollen seed, hard seed, and dead seed). For the AOSA

Table VII

- 3. Summary of 5307 corn seed germination and dormancy frequencies at

nono ptimal temperatures.

Mean germination responses across four replicates from two 5307 and two control hybrids evaluated under different temperature regimes. Reference ranges across four replicates of each of three reference hybrids are provided for comparison. P values are provided for comparisons of the proportion of germinated seed within hybrid pairs; for values in bold text, P < 0.05.

Temp.

( °C) N Genotype Germinated Viable Firm Swollen (%) Viable Hard (%) Dead (%)
% **p** value

5 400 5307 Hybrid #1 0.0 1.000 91.0 0.0 9.0

400 Control Hybrid #1 0.0 97.0 0.0 3.0

400 5307 Hybrid #2 0.0 1.000 97.0 0.0 3.0

400 Control Hybrid #2 0.0 97.0 0.0 3.0

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 0

– 0 93

– 100 0

– 0 0

– 7

10 400 5307 Hybrid #1 96.2 0.018 0.8 0.0 3.0

400 Control Hybrid #1 99.0 0.8 0.0 0.2

401 5307 Hybrid #2 a 97.8 0.263 0.7 0.0 1.5

400 Control Hybrid #2 99.0 0.8 0.0 0.2

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 67

- 100 0

– 26 0

- 0 0

– 7

10/20 400 5307 Hybrid #1 97.2 < 0.001 0.0 0.0 2.8

400 Control Hybrid #1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

400 5307 Hybrid #2 98.2 0.177 0.0 0.0 1.8

400 Control Hybrid #2 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.5

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 97

– 100 0

– 1 0

- 0 0

– 2

10/30 400 5307 Hybrid #1 97.0 < 0.001 0.0 0.0 3.0

400 Control Hybrid #1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

400 5307 Hybrid #2 99.0 0.686 0.0 0.0 1.0

400 Control Hybrid #2 99.5 0.0 0.0 0.5

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 98

– 100 0

– 0 0

– 0 0

– 2

N = Number of seeds tested

a One replicate inadvertently had an extra seed5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 95 of 211 Table VII

- 4. Summary of 5307 corn seed germination and dormancy frequencies at optimal temperatures.

Mean germination responses across four replicates from two 5307 and two control hybrids evaluated under

d ifferent temperature regimes. Reference ranges across four replicates of each of three reference hybrids are provided for comparison. P values are provided for comparisons of the proportion of normally germinated seed within hybrid pairs; for values in bold text, P < 0.05.

Temp.

(°C) N Genotype Normally
Germinated Abnormally
Germinated (%) Viable Firm
Swollen (%) Viable
Hard (%) Dead (%) % p value

25 400 5307 Hybrid #1 97.8 0.420 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.8

400 Control Hybrid #1 98.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8

400 5307 Hybrid #2 97.8 0.021 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.0

400 Control Hybrid #2 99.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 98.0

– 100 0

– 2 0

– 1 0

– 0 0

– 1

20/30 400 5307 Hybrid #1 94.0 < 0.001 2.5 0.0 0.0 3.5

400 Control Hybrid #1 99.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2

398 5307 Hybrid #2 a 97.7 0.297 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.8

400 Control Hybrid #2 98.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

400 Range of Reference Hybrids #1, 2, and 3 97.0

- 100 0

– 3 0

– 0 0

– 0 0

– 2

N = Number of seeds tested

a One of the four replicates inadvertently contained 98 seeds instead of 100



### temperature regimes (25 o 

### C and 20/30 o 

### C)

, statistical comparisons were made for the proportion of seeds classified as normally germinated (i.e., versus the sum of abnormally germinated seed

, viable firm swollen seed , viable hard seed , and dead seed ). The purpose of this comparison was to determine whether there were enhanced germination characteristics for the 5307 seeds as compared to the nontransgenic control seeds ; statistically significant

increases ( p < 0.05) for the 5307 hybrid would provide evidence that such a difference

exists.

A t 5°C, the percentage of seeds that germinated normally was zero for all 5307, control and reference hybrids. Under all other temperature regimes, average germination ranged from 94.0% to 99.0% for the two 5307 hybrids and 98.8% to 100% for the correspond ing nontransgenic controls. Under the same temperature regimes, germination ranged from 67% (at 10°C) to 100% across all replicates of the three reference hybrids. Under individual temperature regimes that supported germination, the percent germinated se ed (at nonoptimal temperatures) or normally germinated seed (at optimal temperatures) was slightly lower for the 5307 hybrids when compared to the corresponding nontransgenic controls; some values for the 5307 hybrids were within the reference range and so me were slightly below the reference range. Under the 10°C, 10°C/20°C, and 10°C/30°C temperature regimes (Table

VII

- 3), germination was statistically significantly lower for 5307 Hybrid #1 than Control Hybrid #1, however, the differences between 5307 Hybr id #2 and Control Hybrid #2 were not significant. Similarly, under the 20°C/30°C regime (Table VII

- 4), normal germination5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 96 of 211 

### was statistically significantly lower for 5307 Hybrid #1 than Control Hybrid #1, and the differences between 5307 Hybrid #2 and Contr ol Hybrid #2 were not significant. Under the

25 °C regime, however, 5307 Hybrid #2 had statistically significantly lower normally germinated seed than Control Hybrid #2, while the differences between 5307 Hybrid #1 and Control Hybrid #1 were not significan t. At no single temperature regime did both 5307 hybrids display significantly different germination than the corresponding control hybrids. The observation that 5307 corn hybrids did not show increased seed germination compared to control hybrids suppor ts the conclusion that 5307 corn does not have plant pest characteristics or increased weediness potential.

Corresponding to the small decreases in germinated seed, small increases in the percent dead

seed at all temperature regimes were observed for the 5307 hybrids compared to their corresponding controls. The observed values were within the corresponding reference range for six comparisons and slightly above the reference range for the remaining six comparisons. Under each temperature regime, t he perc ent of viable firm swollen seed was identical among the 5307 and control hybrids for all comparisons except for 5307 Hybrid #1 at 5°C, for which the value was lower (9 1 %) and slightly below the reference range (93 to 100%).

Most important from the persp ective of plant pest risk is the consid eration of whether the

seed of the transgenic hybrids has increased dormancy potential, as measured by the presence of viable hard seeds. No viable hard seeds were found for any of the hybrids tested under any temper ature regime, thus confirming that dormancy is not a normal characteristic

of corn seeds and that 5307 corn demonstrates no increase in seed dormancy potential.

VII.A.2. Field Agronomic Performance



### Field trials were conducted in the U.S. during the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons to compare a range of agronomic characteristics of a 5307 corn hybrid to a near

- isogenic, nontransgenic hybrid. Table VII

- 5 shows the genotypes of the 5307 and control hybrids planted in these trials (see also Tabl e III

- 1 and Figure III

- 3 ). The near

- isogenic hybrid pairs were grown in five locations in 2007 and 12 locations in 2008. These agronomic trials were

conducted under USDA APHIS notifications 07

- 043

- 109n and 08

- 051

- 104n. The locations

of the trial sites a re representative of major corn growing regions of the U.S. and are listed in

Table VII

- 6.

The trials were planted in a randomized complete block design. In 2007, three replicate plots were planted per location. In 2008, four replicate plots were plan ted per location. Plot size was 0.002 acres (8 m 2 

### ), using two

- row plots that were 17.5 feet long (5.3 meters), with

30

- inch (0.8 m) spacing between the rows. Each plot contained approximately 68 plants. At each trial location, normal agricultural practi ces for pest control were followed , and the same products and application rates were used for both the 5307 plots and control plots.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 97 of 211 

### Insecticides for rootworm control were applied to the control plots as well as the 5307 plots to minimize any rootworm

- c ontrol advantage of the 5307 plants in these trials; soil and foliar applications were made for larval and adult rootworm control, respectively. No attempts were made to enhance natural rootworm infestation levels. The intent of these trials was to compare the underlying agronomic characteristics of 5307 and control corn in the absence of significant rootworm pressure.

Table VII

- 5 . Event 5307 and control hybrids evaluated for agronomic performance.

Year Hybrid Designation Lineage

2007 5307 hybrid NP2171 × NP2460 (BC5F 2 ) (5307)

Control hybrid NP2171 × NP2460

2008 5307 hybrid NP2171 × NP2460(5307) (BC5F 3 ) (5307)

Control hybrid NP2171 × NP2460

Table VII

- 6 . Locations and dates of agronomic performance trials (2007

– 2008).

Year City State Planting Date Harvest Date

2007 Brookings South Dakota May 12 October 22

Waldorf Minnesota May 15 October 25

Corwith Iowa 1 June 7 October 13

Green Valley Illinois May 10 September 21

El Paso Illinois May 11 October 4

2008 Brookings South Dakota May 22 November 5

Minnesota Lake Minnesota May 16 October 21

Northfield Minnesota 2 May 15 October 27

Janesville Wisconsin May 21 October 31

New Haven Indiana May 25 October 31

Beaver Crossing Nebraska June 2 October 5

El Paso Illinois May 21 October 14

Bloomington Illinois June 1 October 22

Shirley Illinois June 18 November 1

St. Joseph Illinois May 29 October 30

La Salle Illinois May 20 October 28

Marshall Missouri May 21 October 1

1 Data were recorded for two replicate plots of the 5307 hybrid and control hybrid at this location. For all other locations in

2007 , data for three replicate plots per genotype were recorded.

2 Data were recorded for three replicate plots of the control hybrid at this location. For the 5307 hybrid at this location and both genotypes at all other locations in 2008, data for four replicate plots per genotype were recorded.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 98 of 211 

### The agronomic characteristics assessed and the timing of each assessment are listed in Table

VII

- 1. The agronomic characteristics chosen for comparison were those typically observed by professional corn breeders and agronomists, and represent a broad rang e of characteristics throughout the development of the corn plant. Not all characteristics were assessed at every trial location; the numbers of replicate plots (N) assessed for each variate are provided in the tables of results, described below. Natural disease infections were measured in trials where infections were sufficiently high to warrant assessment.

Data for several variates (characteristics) were subjected to an analysis of variance across locations using the model (Obert et al., 2004)

Y ijk 

### = U + T i 

### + L j 

### + B(L) jk 

### + LT ij 

### + e ijk



### where Y ijk 

### is the observed response for genotype i at location j block k

, U is the overall

mean, T i 

### is the genotype effect, L j 

### is the location effect, B(L) jk 

### is the effect of block within location, LT ij 

### is the location x genotype interaction effect and e ijk 

### is the residual error. For grain yield, results from analogous within

- location analys e s are also presented.

For each variate, the statistical significance of genotype (5307 versus near

- isogenic cont rol) effect was determined using a standard F

- test. An F

- test probability of < 5% indicates that the difference between the two genotypes was statistically significant at the customary 5%

level. The JMP statistics program, version 7.0, was used for these analyses (SAS Institute; Cary, NC ).

The data for other variates did not lend themselves to formal statistical analysis because they did not conform to the assumptions upon which the vali dity of the analysis depends. In some cases, the issue was that the data were too discrete, with values taking one of a very limited range of options. In other cases

, the data set contained too few non

- zero data points on which to base a reasonable estimate of residual error. Consequently, results for such

variates are presented as means.

The standard error estimates of the means (SE M ) were computed for the variates subjected to analysis of variance by dividing the appropriate error mean square by the sample size and then taking the square root of the resulting value. For variates not subjected to analysis of variance, the range of data values are presented because it is not possible to calculate a good estimate of error variance that takes into account the design structure. The sample sizes (N)

for each of the trait s were computed by summing the number of replications within or over

locations.

Seventeen key agronomic traits were evaluated in the 2007 trials. Additionally, ratings for the severity of gray leaf spot and northern corn leaf blight diseases were recorded at a limited number of locations where ratings were possible. The data for these assessments are

summarized i n Tables VII

- 7 and VII

- 8. In these trials, the 5307 hybrid performed similarly to the corresponding nontransgenic, near

- isogenic control hybrid. For seven out of the ten the traits subjected to statistical comparisons (Table VII

- 7), there were no signifi cant differences between the 5307 hybrid and the control hybrid. For grain moisture, plant5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 99 of 211 

### height, and the number of heat units to 50% pollen shed, there were small but statistically significant differences between the 5307 and control hybrids. Approxima tely 20 to 25 heat units were accumulated each day during pollination. Therefore, the observed average difference of 17 heat units between the 5307 hybrid and the control hybrid corresponds to less than one day, and would not have affected pollination. Th e absence of significant effects on grain yield suggest that the observed statistical differences in these three variates are not biologically significant.

Among the nine variates not subjected to statistical comparisons in the 2007 trials (Table

VII

- 8) , identical mean values were observed for the 5307 and control plants for four variates, and similar means were observed for three other variates. The 5307 plants did not show increased susceptibility to gray leaf spot or northern corn leaf blight disease s. The largest percent differences observed between the 5307 plots and control plots were in late root lodging and the number of barren plants. There were fewer 5307 plants with late root lodging (mean of 0.9% of plants per plot), compared to control pla nts (mean of 2.3% of plants per plot). (In the 2008 trials summarized below, there were not fewer 5307 plants with late root lodging.) There were a mean of 6.3 barren plants per plot for the 5307 hybrid and 2.7 barren plants per plot for the control hybr id. However, it is not possible to assign biological significance to the differences in the number of barren plants , because these observations were based on evaluation of three replicate plots at one location ; as noted above, there were no significant di fferences in grain yield across the 2007 trial locations. Moreover, the mean number of barren plants per plot was identical between the 5307 and control plots in the 2008 trials, in which this variate was assessed in multiple locations (see below).

Twe nty key agronomic traits were evaluated in the 2008 trials ; the 5307 hybrid again performed similarly to the corresponding control hybrid. For the 10 the traits compared

statistical ly (Table VII

- 9), there were no significant differences between the 5307 a nd control hybrid s , except f or grain yield, which was higher in the 5307 hybrid. Among the

10 other variates not compared statistical ly (Table VII

- 10), identical mean values were observed for the 5307 and control plants for four traits, and similar means were observed for the other variates. The largest percentage differences between mean values occurred for snapped plants, for which fewer were recorded in the 5307 plots (15%) than in the control plots (24%), and for late root lodging, which was higher i n th e 5307 plots (0.6%) versus the control plots (0.1%). This difference , however, was the result of higher numbers of root

lodged 5307 plants at a single trial location among the eight locations at which this trait was

evaluated and , as such, does not su ggest an agronomic deficit

.

The results of these phenotypic assessments indicate that 5307 corn is not phenotypically different from conventional corn with respect to characteristics that would increase its weediness potential. Additionally, no deficits in agronomic performance of 5307 corn were

observed.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 100 of 211 Table VII

- 7 . 2007 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates subjected

to s tatistical comparisons

. M

eans across all locations, sample sizes (N = number of plots) , standard errors, and statistical inferences for

variates subjected to analysis of variance and F

- test; significance assigned at p < 0.05 level.

Trait N 5307
Mean Control
Mean SEM % Difference
in Means Prob. >
F

- value Signifi

cance

Emerged plants/plot 12 59 58 0.57 1 .7 15% NS 1

Early growth vigor (1

– 9 rating) 6 1.8 1.8 0.24 0 .0 100% NS

Ear height (cm) 14 94 94 1.13 0 .0 84% NS

Plant height (cm) 14 216 210 1.39 2.9 3% *

Heat units to 50% pollen shed 12 1230 1247 0.89

− 1 .4 0% *

Heat units to 50% silking 12 1251 1265 7.92

− 1 .1 29% NS

Plant population at harvest (plants/acre) 14 27927 28524 870.14

− 2.1 65% NS

Grain moisture (%) 14 17.9 16.9 0.18 5.9 3% *

Test weight (pounds/bushel) 14 53.8 53.4 0.22 0. 7 31.1% NS

Yield (bushels/acre) 14 149.5 154.0 2.35

− 2.9 26.1% NS

NS = F

- test was not significant at the customary 5% level

* = F

- test was significant

Table VII

- 8. 2007 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates not subjected to formal statistical comparisons.

M

eans across locations, sample sizes (N = number of plots) , and ranges of values for variates

.

N 5307 Hybrid Control Hybrid %
Difference
in Means Trait Mean Range of
values Mean Range of
values
Early emergence vigor (1

– 9 rating) 9 2.6 1

- 4 3.0 1

- 5

− 13.3

Leaf color rating (1

– 9) 9 5.0 5 5.0 5 0.0

Late

- season intactness (1

– 9 rating) 14 6.4 4

– 8 6.2 4

- 8 3 .2

Late root lodging (% plants/plot) 11 0.9 0

- 10 2.3 0

- 25

− 60.9

Stalk lodging (plants/plot) 11 0.2 0

– 1 0.2 0

- 1 0.0

Barren Plants (plants/plot) 3 6.3 5

– 9 2.7 2

- 4 133.3

Plants with dropped ears (plants/ plot) 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Gray leaf spot disease rating (1

– 9 scale) 9 2.3 1

- 4 2.6 0

- 5

− 11.5

Northern corn leaf blight disease rating (1

– 9 scale) 2 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.05307

- USDA

- 1 Page 101 of 211 Table VII

- 9 . 2008 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates subjected to statistical comparisons.

Means across all locations, sample sizes (N = number of plots) , standard errors, and statistical inferences for

variates subjected to analysis of variance and F

- test; significance assigned at p < 0.05 level.

Trait 5307 Hybrid Control Hybrid %
Differ ence in Means Prob.

> F

value Signifi

cance N Mean SEM N Mean SEM

Emerged plants/plot 44 62 0.71 43 61 0.73 1 .6 70% NS

Early growth vigor (1

- 9 rating) 32 2.5 0.17 31 2.5 0.18 0 .0 74% NS

Ear height (cm) 40 113 1.81 39 117 1.87

− 3. 4 16% NS

Plant height (cm) 40 247 2.25 39 239 2.32 3.3 10% NS

Heat units to 50% pollen shed 29 1330 2.28 28 1325 2.35 0. 4 88% NS

Heat units to 50% silking 29 1327 3.24 28 1325 3.34 0. 2 61% NS

Plant population at harvest (plants/acre) 48 29040 192.29 47 29092 197.56

− 0. 2 75% NS

Grain moisture (%) 48 20.8 0.14 47 20.3 0.14 2 .5 9% NS

Test weight (pounds/bushel) 48 57.0 0.12 47 57.0 0.12 0 .0 35% NS

Yield (bushels/ac) 48 151.6 2.34 47 138.6 2.36 9.4 0.47% *

* = F

- test was significant

. NS = F

- test was not significant at the customary 5% level

Table VII

- 1 0 . 2008 agronomic performance trials: Comparisons for variates not subjected to formal statistical analysis.

Means across locations, sample sizes (N = number of plots) , and ranges of values for variates.

5307 Hybrid Control Hybrid %
Difference
in Means Trait N Mean Range of
values N Mean Range of
values

Early emergence vigor (1

- 9) 12 3.9 3

- 5 11 4.0 3

- 5

− 2.5

Early root lodging (% plants) 4 0.0 0 3 0.0 0 0.0

Snapped plants (%) 32 15 0

- 87 31 24 0

- 81

− 37.5

Leaf color rating (1

– 9) 32 5 5 31 5 5 0 .0

Late

- season intactness (1

- 9) 41 5.2 1

- 9 40 5.5 1

- 9

− 5.4

Late root lodging (% plants/plot) 32 0.6 0

- 5 30 0 .1 0

- 2 50 0

Push test (no./10 plants) 24 5.9 1

- 10 24 6.9 2

- 10

− 14.5

Stalk lodging (plants/plot) 40 0.7 0

- 2 39 0.8 0

- 5

− 12.5

Barren plants (plants/plot) 28 1 0

- 4 27 1 0

- 4 0 .0

Plants with dropped ears (plants/plot) 22 0 0

- 1 22 0 0 0 .05307

- USDA

- 1 Page 102 of 2 11 VII.A.3. Plant Disease Trials


### Targeted field studies were conducted to examine whether 5307 hybrid corn plants were more susceptible to common plant fungal diseases as compared to their nontransgenic, near

isogenic counterparts grown concurrently under the same conditions. These trials were

conducted in 20 09 under USDA APHIS notifi cation 09

- 063

- 103n. At one Minnesota location, sus ceptibility to eyespot disease ( Kabatiella zeae ) was assessed. At one Illinois location, susceptibility to southern corn leaf blight ( Helminthosporium maydis ) and gray leaf spot disease ( Cercospora zeae

- m aydis ) were assessed. The genotypes of the plants tested were 5XH751 × NP2222(5307) and 5XH751 × NP2222, as also described in Table III

- 1 and Figure III

- 3. Standard agronomic practices were used for all plots, except that foliar fungicides were not appli ed. All plots were planted in a randomized complete block design, using three replicate plot s per genotype, and were artificially inoculated. Disease ratings were conducted on a 1 to 9 rating scale ( ranging from no symptoms to severe symptoms).

The dise ases assessed and the test locations are shown in Table VII

- 11. The data were compared by anal ysis of variance. (Additional entries for other research

- stage corn products in these trials are not shown.) No significant differences were observed in diseas e ratings between the 5307 hybrid and the control hybrid in these trials, indicating that 5307 corn is no more susceptible to these plant disease s than nontransgenic corn of the same genetic background.

Table VII

- 1 1

. Plant Disease Ratings in Field Trials

Hybrid Genotype Eyespot Disease Rating (Least Squares Mean) Southern Corn Leaf Blight Disease Rating (Least Squares Mean) Gray Leaf Spot Disease Rating (Least Squares Mean)

Stanton, MN Shirley, IL Shirley, IL

5307 corn 5.67 2.33 5.33

Control corn 5.33 2.67 5.00

p value 0.714 0.356 0.457

VII.A.4. General Observations from Field Trials


### In connection with its field trial compliance activities, Syngenta required information from

the managers of each of the field sites at which 5307 corn was grown (under various USDA

APHIS notifications, see Appendix A) in 2007, 2008 and 2009 . (Information collection from the 2010 field trials is in progress.) This information included any observations of

whether 5307 corn plants differed from control corn plants in the following characteristics:

**•** Plant health (e.g., susceptibility to disease, pests)

**•** Plant morphology (e.g., leaf color, seed set)

**•** Agronomic characteristics (e.g., weediness, response to drought)

**•** Impact on beneficial i nsects (e.g., ladybeetles)

**•** Impact on nontarget pest insects (e.g., mites)

Excluding any obvious differences in rootworm damage, no observations of differences in

the above characteristics were recorded.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 103 of 211 VII.A.5 . Pollen Viability and Morphology



### Pollen v iability and morphology were evaluated to assess whether 5307 corn differed from

near

- isogenic, nontransgenic control corn in these characteristics

. The 5307 and control hybrid genotypes used in these studies were NP217 1 × NP2460 (BC5F 3 

### ) (5307) and NP217 1

× NP2460 , respectively. These genotypes are also indicated i n Table III

- 1 , and the breeding pedigree is shown in Figure III

- 3

. Pollen grains were examined microscopically after fixing and staining according to the method described by Pedersen et al. (2004 ).

Twenty 5307 hybrid plants and 20 near

- isogenic, nontransgenic control hybrid plants were grown in an environmentally controlled greenhouse. The greenhouse operated on a 16

h ou r/8 hour light/dark cycle with daytime temperatures ranging from 26°C

- 29°C and nighttime temperatures ranging from 21°C

- 23°C. Pollen was collected from the plants 67

- 6 9 days after planting. Pollen samples were immediately fixed in a 70% (v/v) ethanol solution and refrigerated. Samples were stained with a small volume of a KI/I 2 

### (iodine potassium iodide) solution and examined by light microscopy. Viability determinations were made at 50X magnification. Starch contained in the viable pollen ce lls readily bound to the iodine stain. Nonviable cells with little or no starch content were weakly stained and readily identifiable. Percent viability was determined by examining a minimum of 100 pollen cells per sample. Mean percent viable pollen was determined for the Event 5307 and

control corn samples. T hese means were compared by a t

- test with significance assigned at

the standard p < 0.05 level. There was no significant difference in percent viable pollen

detected between 5307 and control. The results of this analysis are presented in Table VII

12. Pollen viability for both hybrids was 99%.

The morphology and diameter of pollen grains in stained pollen samples from five 5307 and five control plants were examined. Morphology was assessed by a microscopic examination

of all cells in the field of view. There were no discernible differences between Event 5307

and control corn pollen morphology. Pollen diameter was measured for ten pollen grains per sample. Mean diameter was calculated for the 5307 and control corn samples. The means were compared by a t

- test with significance assigned at p < 0.05. Pollen cell diameter statistics are presented in Table VII

- 1 2 . Photographs of representative Event 5307

and control corn pollen samples are shown in Figure VII

- 1. No significant differences in average cell diameter were detected between 5307 and control pollen samples.

Therefore, there were no discernible differences in pollen morphology, diameter

, or viability

between 5 307 corn and nontransgenic control corn

.

Table VII

- 12. Pollen viability and diameter measurement s

. Mean percent viability and mean diameter for 5307 and control corn pollen are presented with their standard deviations (SD); means were compared by a t

- test

.

Variable N 5307
Mean + SD Control

Mean + SD **p** value

Pollen viability (%) 20 99.1 + 0.76 98.8 + 1.16 0.486

Pollen diameter (μm) 5 94.0 + 0.001 93.9 + 0.005 0.6985307

- USDA

- 1 Page 104 of 211 Figure VII

- 1. Photographs of stained pollen collected from control and 5307 plants.

Magnification was 80X. 5307 Plant

#129541 80X

100 μm Nonviable Cell

Viable Cell Control Plant

#129519 80X

100 μm Viable Cell

Nonviable Cell5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 105 of 211 VII.A.6

. Seed Dispersal


### Dispersal of individual corn seeds does not occur naturally. The kernels are held inside the husks of the cob and are too heavy to be wind

- blown. There was no significant difference in the propensity of 5307 corn to drop ears than that of conventional corn ( see Tables VII

- 8

and VII

- 1 0 ). Dispersal of individual kernels does, however, take place as a result of mechanical harvesting and transportation. In this regard, 5307 corn kernels would be no

different than conventional corn kernels. Because corn seeds lack dormancy, those that are dispersed outside of cultivated fields c ould germinate if environmental conditions were favorable. However, corn does not have weedy or invasive characteristics. As a highly domesticated crop, corn has los t the ability to reproduce without human intervention.

VII.B. Compositional Assessment of 5307 Forage and Grain



### Compositional analyses of 5307 corn were performed to identify any changes in nutrient or

anti

- nutrient content of the new crop in the contex t of its use as food or feed and to assess its biochemical equivalence and familiarity to conventional corn . This assessment was undertaken by performing quantitative analyses of 59 biochemical components of 5307 hybrid corn forage and grain including key food and feed nutrients, antinutrients, and secondary plant met abolites . An identical set of analyses was performed on nontransgenic,

near

- isogenic control hybrid corn

.

VII.B.1 . Design and methods used in compositional analysis study


### The 5307 hybrid pla nts were genotype NP2171 × NP2460(5307) and the control plants were
genotype NP2171 × NP2460. The seed materials used to plant these composition trials are

also identified in Table III

- 1 and in the pedigree diagram in Figure III

- 3. The trials were

conduc ted under USDA APHIS notification 08

- 051

- 104n.

Forage and grain from the 5307 and control hybrid s were harvested from six locations in the

U

. S

. during 200 8:

Location Code City and State

L1 Stanton, MN

L2 Janesville, WI

L4 New Haven, IN

L6 Shirl ey, IL

L7 Marshall, MO

L8 Bloomington, IL

These locations are representative of major corn growing regions of the U.S. At each location, the hybrids were planted in a randomized complete block design, with three replicates for each genotype. All plots were managed according to local agronomic practices for the respective regions. Plants were self

- pollinated by hand and the developing ears were bagged to avoid cross

- pollination.

The component s measured in this study were selected based on r ecomm endations of the Organis ation for Economic Co

- operation and Development (OECD, 2002 ) for comparative5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 106 of 211 

### assessment of composition of new varieties of corn . The components analyzed are listed in

Table VII

- 13 below.

All analyses were conducted using methods p ublished and approved by the Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC) International or other industry

- standard analytical methods. Based on the moisture content of each sample, analyte levels were converted to equivalent units of dry weight. A detail ed description of the study design and methodology for the compositional analyses is provided in Appendix E.

VII.B.1.a. Statistical analysis for across

- location comparisons


### The data for each component were subjected to analysis of variance using the follo wing

mixed model:

Y ijk 

### = U + T i 

### + L j 

### + B(L) jk 

### + LT ij 

### + e ijk



### In this model, Y ijk 

### is the observed response for genotype i at location j block k

, U is the overall mean, T i 

### is the genotype effect, L j 

### is the location effect, B(L) jk 

### is the effect of block within a location, LT ij 

### is the location

- by

- genotype interaction effect, and e ijk



### For each quantifiable component, an F test was used to assess the statistical significance of the genotype effect with an alpha level of 0.05 and with the denominator degrees of freedom

determined using the Kenward

- Roger method (Kenward and Roger, 1997). Moisture content of grain was not statistically analyzed because the samples had been mechanically

dried. is the residual error. Genotype was regarded as a fixed effect, while the effects of location, block within location, and location

- by

- genotype were rega rded as random.

VII.B.1.b. Statistical analysis for individual

- location comparisons


### The data for each component at each location were subjected to an analysis of variance with genotype and block included in the statistical model. Significance was based on an alpha

level of 0.05.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS v. 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc.; Cary, NC).

VII.B.1.c. Comparison with ILSI Crop Composition Database


### The mean levels of each component for each location and across locations were calculated and compared nonstatistically with means and ranges for forage and grain composition published in the ILSI Crop Composition Database (2008). The ILSI database is the most comprehensive and current source of crop composition data for most nutritional
components.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 107 of 211 Table VII

- 13. Forage and grain components measured in 5307 and con ventional corn

. Forage Grain

Minerals Minerals Amino acids Secondary
Metabolites Fatty acids

Calcium Calcium Alanine (Ala) ρ

- Coumaric acid 16:0 p almitic

Phosphorus Copper Arginine (Arg) Ferulic acid 18:0 s tearic

Proximates Iron Aspartic acid (Asp) Furfural 18:1 o leic

Acid detergent fiber (ADF) Magnesium Cystine (Cys) Inositol 18:2 l inoleic

Ash Manganese Glutamic acid (Glu) Vitamins 18:3 l inolenic

Carbohydrates Phosphorus Glycine (Gly) Vitamin A (β

- carotene) 20:0 arachidic

Fat Potassium Histidine (His) Vitamin B 1 20:1 eicosenoic (thiamine)

Moisture Selenium Isoleucine (Ile) Vitamin B 2 22:0 behenic (riboflavin)

Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) Sodium Leucine (Leu) Vitamin B 3 Anti

- nutrients (niacin)

Protein Zinc Lysine (Lys) Vitamin B 6 Phytic acid (pyridoxine)

Proximates Methionine (Met) Vitamin B 9 Raffinose (folic acid)

ADF Phenylalanine (Phe) Vitamin E (α

- tocopherol) Trypsin inhibitor

Ash Proline (Pro)

Carbohydrates Serine (Ser)

Fat Threonine (Thr)

Moisture Tryptophan (Trp)

NDF Tyrosine (Tyr)

Protein Valine (Val)

Starch

Total Dietary Fiber (TDF)



### Tables VII

- 14 through VII

- 21 report the statistical comparisons of nutritional component levels in forage and grain between 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn , the mean levels for each genotype across locations and at each location, a range of individual replicate values, and the levels for conventional hybrid corn reported in the ILSI Crop Composition Database (2008).

All data were compared with the ranges rep orted in the ILSI database to establish whether the results were within the range of natural variation and to provide an indication of whether the results were likely to be of biological significance.

VII.B.2. Results of statistical analysis for forage



### Wh en analyzed across all six locations, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the measured forage components (proximates, calcium, and phosphorus) between genotypes (Tables VII

- 14 and VII

- 15).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 108 of 211 

### When analyzing the results at each indi vidual location, s tatistically significant differences were observed in moisture, protein, calcium, and phosphorus values , but all of these components were only different at one location (out of six) and all means fe l l within the range of natural variation of corn reported in the ILSI database (ILSI 2008)

.

VII.B.3. Results of statistical analysis for grain


### When analyzed across all six locations, there were no statistically significant differences in 52 of the 59 components including: proximates, starch, and fiber components (Table VII

16), minerals (Table VII

- 17), vitamins B 1 

### , B 2 

### , B 3



### There were a few statistically significant differences observed in vitamins A, B and E (Table VII

- 18), amino acids (Table

VII

- 19), oleic, linoleic, arachidic, and behenic fatty acids (Table VII

- 20), antinutrients, or secondary metabolites (Table VII

- 21).

6 

### , and B 9



### Some statistically significant differences were observed in values for individual locations but all of these components were only different at one or two lo cations and all per

- location

means fell within th e range of natural variation for corn reported in the ILSI database (ILSI 2008) , with the exception of starch and Vitamin B (Table VII

- 18), as well as 16:0 palmitic, 18:0 stearic, 18:3 linolenic, and 20:1 eicosenoic acids (Table VII

- 20). However, the differences observed were small and the mean values

observed for these vitamins and all but one fatty acid (18:3 linolenic) were all within the ranges of values observed for the nontransgenic grain

, and all means fell within the natural

variation of corn reported in the ILSI database (ILSI 2008).

2

VII. B.4. Conclusion of compositional analyses 

### in the nontransgenic grain, for which the values exceeded the reported range

.

For all 59 chemical components that were measured in 5307 forage and grain , including those for which statistically significant differences were observed, the average values (when quantifiable) were within the ran ges of natural variation reported in the ILSI database (2008). No biologically significant changes in composition were found to have occurred as an unintended result of the transformation process or expression of the transgenes in 5307

corn

. In conclusio n, f orage and grain from 5307 corn hybrids are considered similar in composition to forage and grain from both the nontransgenic comparator and conventional

corn hybrids.

These data support the conclusion that 5307 corn will be as safe and nutritious as

co nventional corn.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 109 of 211 Table VII

- 14. Proximate c omposition of forage from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Proximate levels are shown in % DW, except for moisture (% FW). Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data sour ce Statistic Moisture Protein Fat Ash Carbo

hydrates ADF NDF

Across Event 5307 mean 73.0 7.72 1.90 4.12 86.3 29.1 44.9

all range 66.5

– 79.5 5.91

– 10.3 0.893

– 2.81 2.89

– 5.35 82.9

– 88.9 22.3

– 40.1 35.5

– 56.1

Nontransgenic mean 72.3 7.57 1.89 4.34 86.2 28.6 45.4

range 66.7

– 78.0 6.27

– 10.0 0.843

– 2.63 3.43

– 6.18 82.3

– 89.0 19.0

– 41.5 32.3

– 57.4

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P 0.126 0.525 0.893 0.076 0.895 0.696 0.785

SEM 1.49 0.449 0.118 0.295 0.64 1.33 1.91

ILSI (2008) mean 70.2 7.78 2.039 4.628 85.6 27.00 41.51

range 49.1

– 81.3 3.14

– 11.57 <LOQ

– 4.570 1.527

– 9.638 76.4

– 92.1 16.13

– 47.39 20.29

– 63.71

N 945

a 945 921 945 945 945 945

a N is the number of ILSI values used to calculate the mean and excludes values <LOQ5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 110 of 211 Table VII

- 14 ( Continued ). Proximate composition of forage from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Proximate levels are shown in % DW, except for moisture (% FW). Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Moisture Protein Fat Ash Carbo

hydrates ADF N DF

L1 Event 5307 mean 70.2 7.98 2.23 3.50 86.3 26.9 36.4

Nontransgenic mean 68.8 7.28 1.73 3.67 87.3 26.4 40.1

P 0.208 0.286 0.415 0.162 0.162 0.887 0.480

SEM 0.53 0.340 0.346 0.055 0.35 2.48 3.04

L2 Event 5307 mean 72.1 6.96 2.01 4.59 86.4 29.7 44.1

Nontransgenic mean 71.4 6.77 2.11 4.82 86.3 33.8 48.9

P 0.630 0.731 0.772 0.363 0.961 0.433 0.563

SEM 0.96 0.340 0.207 0.139 0.43 2.98 4.97

L4 Event 5307 mean 72.5 7.46 2.15 3.64 86.8 28.1 46.7

Nontransgenic mean 71.3 6.96 2.30 4.01 86.7 26.4 41.1

P 0.105 **0.033** 0.795 0.417 0.771 0.738 0.295

SEM 0.31 0.066 0.350 0.258 0.21 3.13 2.82

L6 Event 5307 mean 76.0 8.40 1.41 4.64 85.5 29.1 47.7

Nontransgenic mean 76.7 9.07 1.77 4.41 84.8 27.0 45.5

P 0.654 0.521 0.192 0.646 0.349 0.092 0.077

SEM 0.99 0.610 0.131 0.300 0.41 0.49 0.46

L7 Event 5307 mean 78.5 9.35 1.73 5.05 84.0 33.8 48.6

Nontransgenic mean 76.7 8.80 1.83 5.47 83.9 32.4 52.9

P **0.007** 0.141 0.695 0.377 0.804 0.672 0.541

SEM 0.10 0.162 0.162 0.265 0.42 2.06 4.19

L8 Event 5307 mean 68.6 6.19 1.89 3.33 88.6 26.7 45.7

Nontransgenic mean 68.7 6.54 1.57 3.65 88.3 25.5 43.7

P 0.225 0.057 0.323 0.162 0.625 0.688 0.594

SEM 0.04 0.061 0.174 0.104 0.33 1.88 2.335307

- USDA

- 1 Page 111 of 211 Table VII

- 15. Calcium and phosphorus c omposition of forage from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Calcium and phosphorus levels shown in mg/kg DW. Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Ca P

Across Event 5307 mean 2346 1906

all range 1450

– 3470 1420

– 2870

Nontransgenic mean 2354 1953

range 1660

– 3350 1390

– 2890

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P 0.886 0.491

SEM 209.3 163.9

ILSI (2008) mean 2028.6 2066.1

range 713.9

– 5767.9 936.2

– 3704.1

N 481 4815307

- USDA

- 1 Page 112 of 211 Table VII

- 15 (Continued) . Calcium and phosphorus c omposition of forage from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Calcium and phosphorus levels shown in mg/kg DW. Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Ca P

L1 Event 5307 mean 2370 1723

Nontransgenic mean 2210 1523

P 0.208 **0.003**

SEM 61.6 8.2

L2 Event 5307 mean 2130 1500

Nontransgenic mean 2223 1457

P 0.711 0.694

SEM 154.5 67.4

L4 Event 5307 mean 2217 1783

Nontransgenic mean 2303 1813

P 0.087 0.869

SEM 19.3 113.1

L6 Event 5307 mean 2497 2493

Nontransgenic mean 2407 2677

P 0.771 0.662

SEM 191.4 255.6

L7 Event 5307 mean 3287 1947

Nontransgenic mean 3190 2043

P **0.032** 0.585

SEM 12.5 105.9

L8 Event 5307 mean 1573 1990

Nontransgenic mean 1793 2203

P 0.138 0.076

SEM 64.8 44.05307

- USDA

- 1 Page 113 of 211 Table VII

- 16. Proximate and starch composition of gr ain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Proximate and starch levels shown in % DW, except moisture (% FW). Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Moisturea Protein Fat Ash Carbo

hydrates ADF NDF TDF Starch

Across Eve nt 5307 mean 10.13 10.86 4.54 1.46 83.1 2.74 8.85 11.8 69.4

all range 9.54

– 11.4 9.12

– 12.6 3.85

– 4.93 1.22

– 1.60 81.0

– 85.3 2.23

– 3.34 7.68

– 9.52 10.8

– 13.4 62.0

– 73.7

Nontransgenic mean 10.18 10.92 4.72 1.40 83.0 2.85 8.83 11.7 70.3

range 9.21

– 12.2 9.20

– 13.0 4.43

– 5.09 1.09

– 1.67 80.7

– 84.7 2.47

– 3.48 7.79

– 10.2 10.6

– 13.5 63.1

– 77.3

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P

– 0.737 0.053 0.138 0.515 0.281 0.930 0.700 0.589

SEM

– 0.375 0.067 0.044 0.44 0.069 0.128 0.19 1.21

ILSI (2008) mean 11.3 10.30 3.555 1.439 84.6 4.05 11.23 16.43 57.7

range 6.1

– 40.5 6.15

– 17.26 1.742

– 5.823 0.616

– 6.282 77.4

– 89.5 1.82

– 11.34 5.59

– 22.64 8.85

– 35.31 26.5

– 73.8

N 1434 1434 1174 1410 1410 1350 1349 397 168

– = not ap plicable

a Grain was mechanically dried after harvest; moisture levels were not subject to ANOVA5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 114 of 211 Table VII

- 16 (Continued). Proximate and starch composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Proximate and starch levels shown in % DW, except moisture (% FW). Results significantly different at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Moisturea Protein Fat Ash Carbo

hydrates ADF NDF TDF Starch

L1 Event 5307 mean 10.54 10.93 4.38 1.43 83.2 2.63 8.66 11.2 69.4 Nontransgenic mean 11.13 10.60 4.79 1.29 83.3 2.89 9.27 11.9 71.7

P

– 0.405 0.068 **0.038** 0.578 0.390 0.623 0.456 0.401

SEM

– 0.225 0.080 0.019 0.14 0.169 0.754 0.54 1.54

L2 Event 5307 mean 10.73 9.38 4.53 1.34 84.8 2.89 9.01 11.7 71.9 Nontransgenic mean 11.00 9.97 4.68 1.25 84.1 2.67 8.73 11.2 74.7

P

– **0.011** 0.358 0.594 0.070 0.152 0.407 0.431 0.090

SEM

– 0.044 0.090 0.094 0.13 0.069 0.188 0.41 0.64

L4 Event 5307 mean 9.77 10.97 4.84 1.42 82.8 2.84 9.20 11.6 72.5 Nontransgenic mean 9.48 10.50 4.84 1.39 83.3 2.73 8.65 11.9 66.0

P

– 0.630 0.974 0.628 0.621 0.391 0.406 0.710 **0.019**

SEM

– 0.586 0.126 0.037 0.65 0.076 0.372 0.50 0.65

L6 Event 5307 mean 9.79 12.37 4.59 1.54 81.5 2.85 9.10 12.5 67.3 Nontransgenic mean 9.56 12.50 4.77 1.62 81.1 2.87 8.89 12.4 67.8

P

– 0.801 0.257 0.159 0.593 0.962 0.442 0.978 0.940

SEM

– 0.327 0.080 0.025 0.41 0.217 0.154 0.75 3.87

L7 Event 5307 mean 10.20 10.60 4.25 1.52 83.6 2.54 8.55 12.0 65.9 Nontransgenic mean 10.27 10.67 4.56 1.38 83.4 2.97 8.45 11.4 68.9

P

– 0.868 0.384 0.112 0.805 0.188 0.842 0.135 0.222

SEM

– 0.249 0.198 0.037 0.42 0.156 0.322 0.19 1.23

L8 Event 5307 mean 9.74 10.90 4.68 1.50 82.9 2.67 8.57 11.7 69.7 Nontransgenic mean 9.64 11.27 4.66 1.47 82.6 2.95 8.99 11.4 72.9

P

– 0.053 0.792 0.159 0.057 0.479 0.519 0.189 0.283

SEM

– 0.062 0.047 0.012 0.05 0.229 0.389 0.11 1.59

– = not applicable. a Grain was mechanically dried after harvest; moisture levels were not subject to ANOVA5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 115 of 211 Table VII

- 17. Mineral composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Mineral levels shown in mg/kg DW. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Ca Cu Fe Mg Mn P K Se a,c Na b,c Zn

A cross Event 5307 mean 43.9 1.52 23.7 1323 5.65 3228 3758

– – 23.0

all range 38.6

– 49.3 0.89

– 4.20 21.2

– 28.0 1150

– 1430 4.69

– 6.61 2620

– 3520 3400

– 4010 <LOQ

– 0.363 < LOQ 19.5

– 26.9

Nontransgenic mean 44.0 1.89 23.3 1336 5.43 3307 3776

– – 23.4

range 40.3

– 50.1 1.02

– 4.36 20.3

– 28.1 1220

– 1450 4.43

– 6.38 2650

– 3600 3240

– 4150 <LOQ

– 0.400 < LOQ 20.5

– 27.9

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P 0.891 0.058 0.308 0.401 0.131 0.110 0.707

– – 0.355

SEM 1.28 0.253 0.85 21.2 0.249 94.7 81.0

– – 0.78

ILSI (2 008) mean 46.4 1.75 21.81 1193.8 6.18 3273.5 3842 0.20 31.75 21.6

range 12.7

– 208.4 <LOQ

– 18.50 10.42

– 49.07 594.0

– 1940.0 1.69

– 14.30 1470.0

– 5330.0 1810.0

– 6030.0 <LOQ

– 0.75 <LOQ

– 731.54 6.5

– 37.2

N 1344

d 1249 1255 1257 1256 1349 1257 89 223 1257

– = not applicable

a The LOQ for selenium was 0.055

– 0.056 mg/kg DW

b The LOQ for sodium was 110

– 114 mg/kg DW

c Where some or all values were <LOQ, calculation of the mean and statistical comparison were not possible, thus only the range is shown

d N is the number of I LSI values used to calculate the mean and excludes values <LOQ5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 116 of 211 Table VII

- 17 (Continued) . Mineral composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Mineral levels shown in mg/kg DW. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Ca Cu Fe Mg Mn P K Se a Na a Zn

L1 Event 5307 mean 47.6 2.66 23.6 1347 5.66 3163 3803 <LOQ

– 0.086 <LOQ 22.3

Nontransgenic mean 45.4 2.89 22.0 1330 5.03 3103 3680 0.079 <LOQ 22.1

P 0.198 0.556 0.187 0.755 0.096 0.712 0.381

– – 0.915

SEM 0.81 0.232 0.55 33.0 0.149 99.7 78.1

– – 0.78

L2 Eve nt 5307 mean 41.6 1.35 22.4 1307 5.16 2857 3473 0.113 <LOQ 20.4

Nontransgenic mean 41.0 1.88 23.1 1337 5.31 2903 3403 0.125 <LOQ 22.1

P 0.657 0.200 0.482 0.644 0.669 0.866 0.724 0.211

– 0.138

SEM 0.87 0.198 0.63 39.4 0.219 172.4 121.7 0.0046

– 0.49

L4 Eve nt 5307 mean 39.7 1.45 27.2 1297 5.09 3293 3657 0.348 <LOQ 25.7

Nontransgenic mean 41.2 1.28 27.5 1283 5.11 3413 3760 0.364 <LOQ 26.8

P 0.200 0.453 0.701 0.732 0.910 0.230 0.446 0.569

– **0.045**

SEM 0.59 0.133 0.42 23.9 0.128 49.7 77.7 0.0160

– 0.16

L6 Event 5307 mean 46.7 0.95 22.5 1347 6.44 3383 3920 <LOQ

– 0.058 <LOQ 22.1

Nontransgenic mean 47.7 1.09 22.5 1353 6.25 3487 3930 <LOQ

– 0.063 <LOQ 21.4

P 0.118 0.271 1.000 0.900 0.369 0.335 0.946

– – 0.559

SEM 0.27 0.066 0.27 33.2 0.117 58.1 92.7

– – 0.78

L7 Eve nt 5307 mean 46.8 1.36 24.3 1243 6.32 3227 3750 <LOQ

– 0.063 <LOQ 24.1

Nontransgenic mean 45.5 2.09 23.4 1297 6.14 3417 3883 <LOQ

– 0.107 <LOQ 23.9

P 0.156 0.302 0.459 **0.047** 0.366 **0.033** 0.231

– – 0.841

SEM 0.40 0.372 0.73 8.5 0.108 24.8 55.4

– – 0.83

L8 Event 5307 mean 40.8 1.34 22.1 1400 5.25 3443 3947 <LOQ

– 0.061 <LOQ 23.5

Nontransgenic mean 42.9 2.14 21.0 1417 4.73 3520 3997 <LOQ

– 0.062 <LOQ 24.2

P 0.152 0.156 0.200 0.588 **0.018** 0.323 0.286

– – 0.417

SEM 0.66 0.252 0.39 18.4 0.049 41.7 24.5

– – 0.51

– = not applicable

a Where some or all values were <LOQ, calculation of the mean and statistical comparison were not possible, thus only the range is shown5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 117 of 211 Table VII

- 18. Vitamin composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Vitamin levels s hown in mg/100 g DW except as indicated for vitamin E (mg/g). Results significant at P <0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Vitamin A

**β**

- carotene Vitamin B1

Thiamine Vitamin B2

Riboflavin Vitamin B3

Niacin Vitamin B6
Pyridoxine Vitamin B9

Folic Acid Vitamin E

α
- tocopherol a

Across Event 5307 mean 0.155 0.449 0.198 3.13 0.692 0.0397 0.0093

all range 0.133

– 0.185 0.399

– 0.511 0.156

– 0.264 2.53

– 4.11 0.587

– 0.769 0.0305

– 0.0460 0.00719

– 0.0111

Nontransgenic mean 0.176 0.458 0.198 3.18 0.737 0.0382 0.0090

range 0.155

– 0.216 0.408

– 0.518 0.152

– 0.318 2.51

– 3.70 0.621

– 0.815 0.0289

– 0.0463 0.00607

– 0.0110

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P **<0.001** 0.146 0.941 0.674 **0.005 0.031**  0.074

SEM 0.0049 0.0126 0.0096 0.104 0.0167 0.00199 0.00055

ILSI (2008) mean 0.684 0.530 0.125 2.376 0.644 0.0651 0.0103

range 0.019

– 4.681 0.126

– 4.000 0.050

– 0.236 1.037

– 4.694 0.368

– 1.132 0.0147

– 0.1464 0.0015

– 0.0687

N 276 894 704 415 415 895 863

a Original units of mg/100 g reported by the testing laboratory were converted to mg/g5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 118 of 211 Table VII

- 18 (Continued) . Vitamin composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Vitamin levels shown in mg/100 g DW except as indicated for vitamin E (mg/g). Results significant at P <0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Vitamin A **β**

- carotene Vitamin B1

Thiamine Vitamin B2

Riboflavin Vitamin B3

Niacin Vitamin B6 Pyridoxine Vitamin B9

Folic Acid Vitamin Ea

α
- tocopherol

L1 Event 5307 mean 0.152 0.473 0.219 3.27 0.611 0.0448 0.0075

Nontransgenic mean 0.171 0.476 0.205 3.29 0.716 0.0434 0.0069

P 0.297 0.939 0.612 0.963 0.105 0.399 0.176

SEM 0.0096 0.0220 0.0162 0.225 0.0261 0.00091 0.00022

L2 Event 5307 mean 0.151 0.456 0.175 3.53 0.660 0.0422 0.0082

Nontransgenic mean 0.167 0.476 0.202 3.33 0.684 0.0424 0.0078

P 0.082 0.232 0.587 0.657 0.645 0.807 0.313

SEM 0.0035 0.0083 0.0294 0.279 0.0321 0.00059 0.00018

L4 Event 5307 mean 0.141 0.488 0.197 3.16 0.739 0.0393 0.0093

Nontransgenic mean 0.159 0.504 0.169 3.20 0.748 0.0360 0.0090

P **0.016** 0.548 0.222 0.903 0.609 0.093 0.289

SEM 0.0017 0.0164 0.0112 0.239 0.0098 0.00078 0.00011

L6 Event 5307 mean 0.172 0.432 0.213 2.89 0.699 0.0427 0.0095

Nontransgenic mean 0.188 0.424 0.246 2.85 0.749 0.0407 0.0094

P 0.061 0.218 0.403 0.826 0.484 0.506 0.743

SEM 0.0029 0.0033 0.0222 0.104 0.0421 0.00176 0.00028

L7 Event 5307 mean 0.157 0.434 0.183 3.16 0.721 0.0317 0.0107

Nontransgenic mean 0.176 0.435 0.172 3.25 0.759 0.0299 0.0109

P 0.218 0.808 0.519 0.709 0.076 0.346 0.733

SEM 0.0076 0.0009 0.0100 0.153 0.0079 0.00104 0.00030

L8 Event 5307 mean 0.160 0.410 0.203 2.77 0.723 0.0377 0.0105

Nontransgenic mean 0.195 0.432 0.191 3.17 0.767 0.0368 0.0098

P **0.025** 0.077 0.560 0.498 **0.003** 0.744 0.454

SEM 0.0040 0.0045 0.0123 0.345 0.0018 0.00176 0.00056

a Original units of mg/100 g reported by testing laboratory were converted to mg/g5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 119 of 211 Table VII

- 19. Amino acid composition of grain from corn 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Amino acid levels shown in mg/g DW. Results significant at P <0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Asp Thr Ser Glu Pro Gly Ala Cys Val

Across Event 5307 mean 6.93 3.80 5.14 20.4 9.23 3.95 8.21 2.33 5.12

all range 5.82

– 8.15 3.19

– 4.39 4.10

– 6.10 16.4

– 24.9 7.55

– 11.0 3.52

– 4.39 6.64

– 9.97 2.07

– 2.50 4.33

– 6.08

Nontransgenic mean 6.88 3.79 5.17 20.6 9.24 3.97 8.24 2.36 5.13

range 6.00

– 8.20 3.36

– 4.47 4.44

– 6.28 17.4

– 25.3 7.84

– 10.9 3.61

– 4.35 7.06

– 10.0 2.14

– 2.59 4.28

– 6.01

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P 0.625 0.908 0.736 0.715 0.973 0.761 0.846 0.284 0.877

SEM 0.236 0.123 0.203 0.90 0.375 0.087 0.345 0.043 0.179

ILSI (2008) mean 6.88 3.75 5.12 20.09 9.51 3.85 7.90 2.21 4.90

range 3.35

– 12.08 2.24

– 6.66 2.35

– 7.69 9.65

– 35.36 4.62

– 16.32 1.84

– 5.39 4.39

– 13.93 1.25

– 5.14 2.66

– 8.55

N 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 13505307

- USDA

- 1 Page 120 of 211 Table VII

- 19 (Continued) . Amino acid composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Amino acid levels shown in mg/g DW. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Asp Thr Ser Glu Pro Gly Ala Cys Val

L1 Event 5307 mean 7.07 3.82 5.09 21.1 9.25 3.86 8.42 2.33 5.25

Nontransgenic mean 6.74 3.71 4.98 19.9 8.51 3.80 7.97 2.34 5.00

P 0.133 0.197 0.431 0.239 0.408 0.059 0.212 0.707 0.179

SEM 0.096 0.043 0.082 0.51 0.499 0.011 0.176 0.016 0.088

L2 Event 5307 mean 5.94 3.26 4.28 16.8 7.78 3.56 6.78 2.12 4.40

Nontransgenic mean 6.27 3.48 4.63 18.3 8.18 3.75 7.30 2.26 4.66

P **0.030 0.018**  0.118 **0.010** 0.380 **0.028 0.010**  0.148 **0.012**

SEM 0.041 0.021 0.092 0.10 0.255 0.024 0.037 0.045 0.020

L4 Event 5307 mean 6.96 3.81 5.25 20.5 9.08 4.04 8.23 2.36 5.17

Nontransgenic mean 6.97 3.84 5.32 20.9 9.78 4.13 8.40 2.36 5.30

P 0.961 0.833 0.761 0.591 0.247 0.485 0.591 0.940 0.367

SEM 0.128 0.088 0.149 0.48 0.307 0.075 0.186 0.028 0.079

L6 Event 5307 mean 7.89 4.31 5.94 24.0 10.90 4.28 9.60 2.47 5.82

Nontransgenic mean 7.73 4.22 5.95 23.9 10.14 4.18 9.48 2.54 5.72

P 0.747 0.668 0.976 0.967 0.301 0.606 0.849 0.277 0.820

SEM 0.306 0.123 0.206 1.01 0.390 0.124 0.393 0.033 0.272

L7 Event 5307 mean 6.69 3.68 4.98 19.3 8.82 3.95 7.85 2.32 4.91

Nontransgenic mean 6.48 3.61 4.93 19.0 8.92 3.86 7.68 2.32 4.74

P 0.514 0.680 0.885 0.772 0.763 0.554 0.725 0.840 0.533

SEM 0.192 0.109 0.186 0.78 0.219 0.084 0.292 0.021 0.167

L8 Event 5307 mean 7.03 3.89 5.30 20.9 9.55 4.02 8.36 2.39 5.16

Nontransgenic mean 7.09 3.88 5.19 21.5 9.89 4.08 8.59 2.36 5.38

P 0.835 0.933 0.519 0.661 0.584 0.594 0.648 0.311 0.508

SEM 0.189 0.075 0.097 0.83 0.368 0.064 0.306 0.019 0.1985307

- USDA

- 1 Page 121 of 211 Table VII

- 19 ( Continued ). Amino acid composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Amino acid levels shown in mg/g DW. Results significant at P <0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Location Data source Statistic Met Ile Leu Tyr Phe Lys His Arg Trp

Across Event 5307 mean 2.29 3.92 13.8 3.18 5.50 3.10 2.99 4.81 0.570

all range 1.97

– 2.51 3.19

– 4.77 10.8

– 17.1 1.57

– 4.18 4.34

– 6.68 2.76

– 3.36 2.57

– 3.44 3.72

– 5.56 0.381

– 0.704

Nontransgenic mean 2.36 3.91 13.8 3.26 5.52 3.09 3.01 4.82 0.557

range 2.08

– 2.56 3.23

– 4.71 11.5

– 17.3 1.67

– 3.98 4.73

– 6.70 2.74

– 3.38 2.57

– 3.43 4.20

– 5.32 0.380

– 0.700

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P 0.102 0.947 0.789 0.711 0.883 0.902 0.684 0.892 0.722

SEM 0.049 0.163 0.66 0.153 0.239 0.059 0.088 0.144 0.0298

ILSI (2008) mean 2.09 3.68 13.41 3.36 5.25 3.15 2.96 4.33 0.627

range 1.24

– 4.68 1.79

– 6.92 6.42

– 24.92 1.03

– 6.42 2.44

– 9.30 1.72

– 6.68 1.37

– 4.34 1.19

– 6.39 0.271

– 2.150

N 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350 13505307

- USDA

- 1 Page 122 of 211 Table VII

- 19 ( Continued ). Amino acid composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Amino acid levels shown in mg/g DW. Results significant at P <0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Met Ile Leu Tyr Phe Lys His Arg Trp

L1 Event 5307 mean 2.32 4.03 14.3 2.88 5.63 3.08 3.01 4.43 0.497

Nontransgenic mean 2.32 3.74 13.3 3.47 5.26 3.06 2.92 4.61 0.601

P 0.915 0.150 0.231 0.334 0.283 0.319 0.175 0.429 0.552

SEM 0.039 0.092 0.39 0.330 0.177 0.014 0.031 0.132 0.1039

L2 Event 5307 mean 2.02 3.26 11.1 2.57 4.49 2.81 2.62 4.19 0.494

Nontransgenic mean 2.23 3.49 12.2 3.02 4.86 2.95 2.80 4.44 0.539

P 0.144 0.066 **0.007** 0.228 0.079 0.072 **0.009** 0.161 0.656

SEM 0.061 0.043 0.06 0.187 0.077 0.029 0.012 0.083 0.0605

L4 Event 5307 mean 2.28 3.95 13.8 3.16 5.50 3.19 3.03 5.02 0.680

Nontransgenic mean 2.36 4.01 14.1 3.52 5.63 3.22 3.11 5.29 0.588

P 0.279 0.535 0.589 0.622 0.515 0.762 0.402 0.343 0.169

SEM 0.037 0.057 0.30 0.441 0.114 0.068 0.058 0.157 0.0307

L6 Event 5307 mean 2.42 4.56 16.4 3.54 6.46 3.31 3.34 5.23 0.624

Nontransgenic mean 2.52 4.46 16.3 3.06 6.31 3.21 3.28 4.92 0.658

P 0.115 0.793 0.931 0.524 0.724 0.578 0.721 0.523 0.427

SEM 0.027 0.229 0.72 0.446 0.255 0.100 0.109 0.279 0.0238

L7 Event 5307 mean 2.37 3.74 13.0 3.43 5.27 3.08 2.91 5.02 0.554

Nontransgenic mean 2.39 3.58 12.7 3.39 5.18 2.97 2.82 4.84 0.502

P 0.823 0.538 0.761 0.895 0.781 0.333 0.589 0.555 0.403

SEM 0.037 0.154 0.61 0.189 0.193 0.063 0.100 0.178 0.0350

L8 Event 5307 mean 2.32 3.98 14.0 3.48 5.68 3.12 3.04 4.95 0.573

Nontransgenic mean 2.32 4.21 14.5 3.08 5.88 3.15 3.13 4.80 0.454

P 0.919 0.477 0.644 0.665 0.592 0.607 0.509 0.703 0.134

SEM 0.021 0.187 0.61 0.562 0.231 0.031 0.086 0.236 0.03425307

- USDA

- 1 Page 123 of 211 Table VII

- 20. Fatty acid composition a
Fatty acids shown as % of total fatty acids. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided. of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

.

Location Data source Statistic 16:0
Palmitic 16:1
Palmitoleic b 18:0
Stearic 18:1
Oleic 18:2
Linoleic 18:3
Linolenic 20:0
Arachidic 20:1
Eicosenoic 22:0
Behenic

Across Event 5307 mean 15.7

– 1.74 24.5 55.6 1.60 0.392 0.250 0.220

all range 15.1

– 16.1 <LOQ

– 0.137 1.50

– 2.04 22.0

– 27.0 53.2

– 58.1 1.48

– 1.71 0.353

– 0.453 0.238

– 0.265 0.186

– 0.252

Nontransgenic mean 15.2

– 1.81 24.9 55.7 1.50 0.387 0.242 0.213

range 14.6

– 15.9 <LOQ

– 0.450 1.54

– 2.17 22.6

– 26.4 53.8

– 58.4 1.40

– 1.57 0.361

– 0.437 0.232

– 0.261 0.194

– 0.247

ANOVA ( F test)

Genotype effect P **<0.001**

– **0.038** 0.108 0.599 **<0.001** 0.186 **<0.001** 0.243

SEM 0.07

– 0.059 0.54 0.60 0.017 0.0098 0.0029 0.0056

ILSI (2008) mean 11.50 0.154 1.82 25.8 57.6 1.20 0.412 0.297 0.176

range 7.94

– 20.71 <LOQ

– 0.447 1.02

– 3.40 17.4

– 40.2 36.2

– 66.5 0.57

– 2.25 0.279

– 0.965 0.170

– 1.917 <LOQ

– 0.349

N 1344 596 1344 1344 1344 1344 988 987 924

– = not applicable

a Where some or all values were <LOQ, % of total fatty acids could not be calculated and statistical analysis could not be performed. Levels <LOQ were observed for all replicates at all locations for 8:0 caprylic, 10:0 capric, 12:0 lauric, 14:0 myristic, 14:1 myristoleic, 15:0 pentade canoic, 15:1 pentadecenoic, 17:0 heptadecanoic, 17:1 heptadecenoic, 20:2 eicosadienoic, 20 :3 eicosatrienoic, and 20:4 arachidonic fatty acids

b Some values were <LOQ, therefore, only the range is shown5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 124 of 211 Table VII

- 20 ( Continued ). Fatty acid composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Fatty acids shown as % of total fatty acids. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic 16:0
Palmitic 16:1
Palmitoleic a 18:0
Stearic 18:1
Oleic 18:2
Linoleic 18:3
Linolenic 20:0
Arachidic 20:1
Eicosenoic 22:0
Behenic

L1 Event 5307 mean 15.5 <LOQ 1.53 22.4 58.1 1.63 0.374 0.247 0.210

Nontransgenic mean 15.1 <LOQ 1.58 22.7 58.2 1.51 0.371 0.237 0.204

P 0.225

– **0.013** 0.286 0.199 0.122 0.641 0.061 0.730

SEM 0.16

– 0.004 0.15 0.06 0.033 0.0043 0.0019 0.0107

L2 Event 5307 mean 15.8 <LOQ 1.77 23.5 56.4 1.67 0.397 0.242 0.216

Nontransgenic mean 15.5 <LOQ

– 0.450 1.93 24.3 55.8 1.54 0.388 0.238 0.202

P 0.149

– 0.202 0.120 0.406 **0.017** 0.467 0.476 0.100

SEM 0.10

– 0.060 0.22 0.43 0.012 0.0077 0.0038 0.0035

L4 Event 5307 mean 15.7 0.134 1.76 25.3 54.8 1.57 0.391 0.245 0.200

Nontransgenic mean 15.2 0.132 1.86 25.5 55.0 1.47 0.391 0.240 0.212

P **0.013** 0.372 **0.023** 0.319 0.478 **0.019** 0.960 **0.047** 0.373

SEM 0.04 0.0017 0.011 0.14 0.16 0.010 0.0042 0.0009 0.0075

L6 Event 5307 mean 15.8 <LOQ

– 0.132 1.68 24.5 55.5 1.60 0.368 0.246 0.228

Nontransgenic mean 15.1 <LOQ

– 0.134 1.72 24.7 56.1 1.54 0.370 0.239 0.206

P 0.069

– 0.270 0.560 0.210 0.203 0.606 0.242 0.072

SEM 0.14

– 0.019 0.17 0.25 0.023 0.0027 0.0029 0.0045

L7 Event 5307 mean 15.5 <LOQ 1.98 26.4 53.6 1.55 0.441 0.263 0.242

Nontransgenic mean 15.4 <LOQ

– 0.143 1.96 26.1 54.1 1.47 0.427 0.253 0.235

P **0.038**

– 0.701 0.493 0.291 0.086 0.336 0.132 0.678

SEM 0.02

– 0.032 0.26 0.23 0.017 0.0077 0.0030 0.0098

L8 Event 5307 mean 15.7 <LOQ

– 0.137 1.71 24.9 55.1 1.59 0.380 0.254 0.221

Nontransgenic mean 15.0 <LOQ

– 0.124 1.80 25.9 54.9 1.45 0.378 0.247 0.220

P 0.053

– 0.082 0.211 0.678 0.093 0.878 0.294 0.946

SEM 0.13

– 0.020 0.39 0.29 0.032 0.0054 0.0037 0.0061

– = not applicable

a Where some or all values were < LOQ, % of total fatty acids could not be calculated, statistical analysis could not be performed, and only the range is shown5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 125 of 211 Table VII

- 21. Secondary metabolite and antinutrient composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Analyte units as in column headings. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type.
For across

- location analyses, N = 18; the range of values among these replicates is provided.

Ferulic acid ρ
- Coumaric
acid Inositol Phytic acid Try psin
inhibitor Furfural a,b Raffinose

Location Data source Statistic (mg/kg DW) (mg/kg DW) (ppm DW) (% DW) (TIU/mg DW) (mg/kg DW) (% DW)

Across Event 5307 mean 1906 186 2510 0.910 3.34

– 0.156

all range 1670

– 2190 153

– 229 2120

– 3160 0.671

– 1.03 2.39

– 4.42 < LOQ 0.115

– 0.199

Nontransgenic mean 1889 186 2504 0.942 3.46

– 0.163

range 1620

– 2090 148

– 226 1980

– 3060 0.729

– 1.06 2.22

– 3.94 < LOQ 0.119

– 0.188

ANOVA ( F test)
Genotype effect P 0.691 0.926 0.951 0.216 0.393

– 0.066

SEM 52.4 9.1 86.1 0.0261 0.118

– 0.0087

ILSI (2008) mean 2201.1 218.4 1331.5 0.745 2.73 3.697 0.312

range 291.9

– 3885.8 53.4

– 576.2 89.0

– 3765.4 0.111

– 1.570 <LOQ

– 7.18 <LOQ

– 6.340 <LOQ

– 0.320

N 817

c 817 504 1196 696 14 701

– = not applicable

a The LOQ for furfural was 0.55

– 0.57 mg/kg DW

b All values were <LOQ and therefore statistical comparison was not possible

c N is the number of ILSI values used to calculate the mean and excludes values <LOQ5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 126 of 211 Table VII

- 21 (Continued). Secondary metabolite and antinutrient composition of grain from 5307 corn and nontransgenic corn

. Analyte units as in column headings. Results significant at P < 0.05 are shown in bold italic type. For individual location means, N = 3.

Location Data source Statistic Ferulic acid (mg/kg DW) ρ
- Coumaric acid (mg/kg DW) Inositol (ppm DW) Phytic acid (% DW) Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/mg DW) Furfural a (m g/kg DW) Raffinose (% DW)

L1 Event 5307 mean 1770 169 2323 0.903 3.31 <LOQ 0.179

Nontransgenic mean 1883 187 2160 0.878 3.58 <LOQ 0.174

P 0.579 0.494 0.062 0.577 0.124

– 0.707

SEM 122.2 15.9 30.1 0.0268 0.073

– 0.0082

L2 Event 5307 mean 1747 197 2517 0.840 2.90 <LOQ 0.166

Nontransgenic mean 1827 207 2230 0.848 3.48 <LOQ 0.178

P 0.463 0.375 0.323 0.938 0.111

– 0.607

SEM 62.8 6.5 155.8 0.0592 0.149

– 0.0133

L4 Event 5307 mean 2137 226 2790 1.000 3.58 <LOQ 0.164

Nontransgenic mean 1977 209 2760 1.006 3.73 <LOQ 0.175

P 0.186 0.193 0.896 0.818 0.702

– 0.093

SEM 57.2 6.3 143.5 0.0171 0.241

– 0.0026

L6 Event 5307 mean 2017 177 2527 0.842 3.44 <LOQ 0.167

Nontransgenic mean 1990 185 2523 0.965 3.64 <LOQ 0.173

P 0.829 0.702 0.959 0.156 0.412

– 0.234

SEM 76.6 12.8 40.9 0.0390 0.140

– 0.0027

L7 Event 5307 mean 1800 159 2470 0.912 3.40 <LOQ 0.139

Nontransgenic mean 1753 154 2627 0.984 3.28 <LOQ 0.156

P 0.340 0.225 0.691 0.053 0.861

– 0.091

SEM 26.6 2.0 241.1 0.0123 0.403

– 0.0039

L8 Event 5307 mean 1967 186 2433 0.964 3.41 <LOQ 0.122

Nontransgenic mean 1903 175 2727 0.971 3.02 <LOQ 0.123

P 0.604 0.601 0.081 0.864 0.311

– 0.893

SEM 73.5 13.0 62.8 0.0230 0.205

– 0.0031

– = not applicable

a All values were <LOQ and therefore statistical comparison was not possible5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 127 of 211 V I I.C. Su mmary of Phenotypic and Compositional Evaluation s



### The results of laboratory, greenhouse, and field studies indicate that 5307 corn is no

different than conventional corn with regard to phenotypic and compositional properties that bear on weediness potential for the new culti var. C orn as a crop has lost the ability to

survive outside of cultivation (OECD, 2003). It can overwinter and germinate in a subsequent crop as a volunteer weed; for example, corn is a common volunteer in soybeans. Nevertheless, several features of corn make it unlikely to form troublesome or self

sustaining weedy populations in agricultural systems: 1 ) it is easily controlled in subsequent crops by selective herbicides; 2 ) seed dispersal is limited because seeds are held inside the husks of the cob; an d 3 ) the seeds lack dormancy characteristics

. Corn does not persist in habitats outside agriculture because, in addition to the features listed above, it requires disturbed ground to germinate and it is very uncompetitive a gainst perennial vegetation.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 128 of 211 

### VIII. Environmental Consequences of Introduction



### Event 5307 corn contains a novel protein, eCry3.1Ab, that has insecticidal activity against a number of coleopteran species that are pests of U.S. agriculture. Studies have been

conducted to define the spectrum of insecticidal activity for eCry3.1Ab and to assess the efficacy of 5307 corn hybrids in resisting corn rootworm larval feeding damage. An assessment of risk for nontarget organisms and endangered species that might be exposed to eCry3.1Ab in 53 07 corn has been performed. This risk assessment is comprised of multiple
parts:

**•** A determination of estimated environmental concentrations (EECs) for eCry3.1Ab;

**•** A characterization of potential hazards posed by eCry3.1Ab to nontarget indicator organism s appropriate for a corn ecosystem;

**•** A comparison of EECs to no

- observable

- effect concentrations for nontarget organisms; and

**•** A specific characterization of risk to endangered or threatened species.

Given the ubiquitous distribution of PMI enzymes in n ature, their nontoxic mode of action, and the apparent absence of environmental risk associated with PMI enzymes, it can reasonably be assumed that the presence of PMI as a selectable marker in 5307 corn will not alter the ecological balance within corn ec osystems. PMI is also present as a selectable marker in two other Syngenta corn events that have been deregulated by APHIS, namely

MIR604 corn (for rootworm control) and MIR162 corn (for lepidopteran control).

VIII.A. Spectrum of eCry3.1Ab Insecticidal A ctivity



### Syngenta has conducted mortality bioassays using 5307 corn tissue or diets containing microbially produced eCry3.1Ab in a range of insect species to identify those that are susceptible to the toxin. (A description of the microbially produced eCry 3.1Ab test

substance used in several of these studies is provided in Part VI.A.1.a. Production of eCry3.1Ab for Safety Testing.) The results of these bioassays demonstrate that activity of eCry3.1Ab is limited to species within the order Coleoptera, yet all coleopteran species are not sensitive to the protein. This narrow spectrum of activity for eCry3.1Ab is a very positive attribute from an ecological perspective; corn plants containing eCry3.1Ab are unlikely to pose a risk to nontarget organisms inhab iting corn ecosystems. Table VIII

- 1 lists the insect species that have been found by Syngenta to be sensitive or insensitive to eCry3.1Ab. These results have been compiled from a combination of both laboratory and

in

- field assessments.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 129 of 211 Table VIII

- 1. Insect species screened for sensitivity to eCry3.1Ab.

Activity was assessed in insects fed diets comprised of 5307 corn leaf tissue or diets containing microbially produced eCry3.1Ab, or based on field evaluations of 5307 plants.

Order: Family Genus and Species Common name (s) eCry3.1Ab Activity

Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae Leptinotarsa decemlineata Colorado potato beetle Active 1

Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Western corn rootworm Active 2

Diabrotica longicornis barberi Northern corn rootworm Active 1 3

Diabrotica virgifera zeae Mexican corn rootworm Active 1 3

Diabrotica undecimpunctata

howardi Southern corn rootworm Spotted cucumber beetle Not Active 4

Coleoptera: Coccinellidae Coleomegilla maculata Spotted ladybird beetle Not Active 5

Coleoptera: Staphylinidae Aleochara bilineata Rove beetle Not Active 6

Coleoptera: Carabidae Poecilus cupreus Ground beetle Not Active 7

Lepidoptera: Noctuidae Agrotis ipsilon Black cutworm Not Active 8

Helicoverpa zea Corn earworm

Cotton bollworm Not Active 8

Spodoptera frugiperda Fall armyworm Not Active 8

Heliothis virescens Tobacco budworm Not Active 8

Lepidoptera: Crambidae Ostrinia nubilalis European corn borer Not Active 8

Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae Pectinophora gossypiella Pink bollworm Not Active 9

Hemiptera: Anthocoridae Orius laevigatus Flower bug Not Active 10

1 Activity against this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay described below ( see Table VIII

- 2) and confirmed in additional laboratory assays described in Part VI.A.1.b and Appendix C

. 2 Activity against this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay described below (see Table VIII

- 2) and confirmed in laboratory assays described by Walters et al. (2010). Activity was also confirmed in field evaluations described in Part VIII.B.

3 Activity against this species was determined in field evaluations described in Part VIII.B.

4 Inactivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay described below; see Table VIII

- 2.

5 Inactivity in this specie s was determined in the laboratory bioassay described in Part VIII.D.4.a.

6 Inactivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay described in Part VIII.D.5.b.

7 Inactivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay describe d in Part VIII.D.5.a.

8 Inactivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassays described below; see Tables VIII

- 2 and VIII

- 3.

9 Inactivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassay described below; see Table VIII

- 2.

10 Ina ctivity in this species was determined in the laboratory bioassays described in Part VIII.D.4.b.



### Presented below (Table VIII

- 2 ) are the results of qualitative insect screening bioassays with three coleopteran and six lepidopteran pest species listed in Table VIII

- 1

. Included among the test species were those known to be sensitive to one of the component Cry proteins (mCry3A or Cry1Ab) represented in eCry3.1Ab (Figure IV

- 1) . Western corn rootworm and Colorado potato beetle are sensitive to mC ry3A (EPA, 2010e), whereas corn earworm, tobacco budworm, and European corn borer are sensitive to Cry1Ab (Crickmore, 2010)

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 130 of 211 

### The screening bioassay s were conducted using the cell lysate from an E. coli expression system producing eCry3.1Ab. Aliquots of t he cell lysate were mixed 1:1 (v/v) with molten artificial diet appropriate for each insect and the diet was allowed to solidify. For each species tested, an aliquot of the diet mixture containing eCry3.1Ab was placed in a 50 × 9 mm culture dish, to which 20 neonate larvae were then added. Control culture dishes containing larvae and untreated diet were prepared concurrently in the same manner. Additional controls were concurrently treated with cell lysate from E. coli transformed with

a blank version of the plasmid vector (i.e., lacking the gene ecry3.1Ab ). Lids were placed on the culture dishes and the larvae were incubated at approximately 25°C in the dark. Mortality was assessed after 5

- 6 days.

Among the three coleopteran species tested in this set of assays, western corn rootworm and Colorado potato beetle appeared to be highly sensitive to eCry3.1Ab and exhibited 90 % and 100% mortality, respectively (Table VIII

- 2)

. (The precise eCry3.1Ab concentration in the

test diets was not determined in this screening experiment , but evidently exceeded the LC 50

Table VIII

- 2

. Bioassays of coleopteran and lepidopteran pest larvae with eCry3.1Ab

. 

### s for the sensitive species, based on the high mortality observed.) Southern corn rootworm

was insensitive to eCry3.1Ab at the same concentration that was highly toxic to the other coleopteran species t ested ; only 10% mortality was observed, and this was within the range of control mortality seen across this series of assays (0

– 20%)

. All six of the lepidopteran species tested were insensitive to eCry3.1Ab. The absence of lepidopteran activity is

cons istent with the fact that, although eCry3.1Ab contains a portion of Cry1Ab (Figure IV

1), that portion does not include the region responsible for lepidopteran activity.

Treatment % Mortality ( **N** = 20)

WCR SCR CPB FAW BCW CEW TBW ECB PBW

eCry3A.1Ab from
E. coli lysate + diet 90 10 100 0 10 0 0 0 20
Control E. coli lysate + diet 10 NT NT 1 0 20 10 0 0 20

Diet only 0 NT NT 0 0 20 0 0 0

WCR = w estern c orn r ootworm ; SCR = southern c orn r ootworm ; CPB = Colorado p otato b eetle ; FAW = f all a rmyworm ; BCW = b lack c utworm ; CEW = corn e arworm ; TBW = tobacco b udworm ; ECB = European corn borer; PBW = pink
bollworm

, 1 NT = Not tested



### Presented below (Table VIII

- 3) are the results of insect bioassays conducted using leaf pieces of 5307 corn and nontransgenic, near

- isogenic corn. Plants were grown in a greenhouse until they had reached the V6 (six

- leaf) stage. Five lepidopteran pest species were tested in five repli cate cultures each per treatment. Each replicate consisted of 10 first instars placed in a culture dish with a moistened absorbent pad and a one

- inch square piece of leaf tissue. After 120 hours, the percent leaf damage by the larvae was recorded. For

e ach species, the percent of leaf area damaged was compared between the 5307 corn leaf treatments and the control corn leaf treatments by analysis of variance.

There were no statistically significant differences between the 5307 and control leaves in the percent leaf area damaged by any pest species; all the larvae fed extensively on the leaf5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 131 of 211 

### tissue from both sources and continued to develop normally during the test period. This study confirmed that 5307 corn containing eCry3.1Ab does not have lepidopter an activity.

Table VIII

- 3 . Bioassays of l epidopteran p est l arvae with l eaf p ieces from 5307 c orn.

Corn Leaf
Source Replicate 1 Percent Leaf Area Damaged by Pest Species 2

ECB FAW BCW CEW TBW

C ontrol 1 85 100 40 35 40
C ontrol 2 95 95 60 35 95
C ontrol 3 65 100 50 30 45
C ontrol 4 45 100 30 40 80
C ontrol 5 70 100 50 35 55

5307 1 75 95 50 40 45

5307 2 75 85 45 30 75

5307 3 50 90 35 35 95

5307 4 65 100 45 35 85

5307 5 40 100 40 40 90

C ontrol Mean ± SD 72 ± 19 99 ± 2.2 46 ± 11 35 ± 3.5 63 ± 24

5307 Mean ± SD 61 ± 16 94 ± 6.5 43 ± 5.7 36 ± 4.2 78 ± 20



### F

- Test Probability 0.349 0.143 0.613 0.694 0.309

1 N = 10 larvae per replicate.

2

VIII.B. Activity of eCry3.1Ab and 5307 Corn Against Target Insects

ECB = European corn borer; FAW = fall armyworm; BCW = black cutworm ; CEW = corn earworm; TBW = tobacco
budworm



### As shown in Table VIII

- 1, eCry3 .1Ab has activity against three of the major rootworm pests

of corn in the U.S., specifically: D. virgifera virgifera LeConte (western corn rootworm)

, D. longicornis barberi Smith and Lawrence (northern corn rootworm)

, and D. virgifera zeae Krysan and Smith (Mexican corn rootworm). Expressing an ecry3.1Ab gene at adequate

levels in corn is a logic al approach for limiting crop losses attributable to these pests, especially considering the limitations of conventional insecticides in controlling corn rootworms. Thus, 5307 corn was developed. In hybrid offerings to growers, the gene

e c ry3.1Ab in 5307 corn will be combined through traditional breeding with other deregulated corn varieties containing additional insect

- protection traits, as well as herb icide

tolerance traits (i.e. , as Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC15 07 × 5307 × GA21 corn hybrids).

Field trials to date have demonstrated excellent efficacy of 5307 corn in controlling root feeding damage by western, northern and Mexican corn rootworms. While western and northern corn rootworms are pests of corn throu ghout the midwestern states, the Mexican corn rootworm occurs in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico (Krysan, 1986). The photograph in Figure VIII

- 1 illustrates how destructive western corn rootworm larva l feeding can be to a control hybrid under high pest pr essure and how highly effective the 5307 hybrid is in preventing damage under the same pest pressure.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 132 of 211 Figure VIII

- 1. Root mass of a 5307 hybrid compared to a control hybrid under high western corn rootworm pressure.

A typical root mass of a 5307 hybrid is shown on the left (Shirley, IL, 2008). Note the loss of entire nodes of roots from the control hybrid on the right due to extensive feeding by corn

rootworm larvae.



### Representative efficacy results from five yea rs of field trials (2005

– 2009) are shown in Figure VIII

- 2 . These trials were conducted in 21 locations in Illinois and Minnesota under

USDA APHIS notifications 05

- 062

- 02n, 06

- 055

- 08n, 07

- 043

- 109n, 08

- 051

- 104n, and 09

- 063

- 103n. Efficacy was assessed und er natural rootworm infestation, which was facilitated by planting a cucurbit trap crop the previous season to attract corn rootworm beetles for increased egg accumulation (Branson and Sutter, 1989)

. T he efficacy of a 5307 hybrid was compared to a control hybrid and also to a MIR604 corn hybrid, both alone and in stacked combination by conventional breeding (referred to as a “MIR604 x 5307” hybrid). MIR604

corn produces a modified Cry3A (mCry3A) protein for corn rootworm control; Syngenta currently market s MIR604 corn as Agrisure® RW rootworm control.

Root damage ratings were assigned on a scale of 0.01 (no damage) to 3.0 (heavy damage) using a modification of the Iowa State University node

- injury linear (0

– 3) scale for rating damage by corn rootworm larvae (Oleson et al., 2005). At the Illinois trial locations, the predominant rootworm species was western corn rootworm, whereas the trials in Minnesota

had mixed infestations of western and northern corn rootworms.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 133 of 211 

### The results of these trials demons trate the high rootworm control efficacy of the eCry3.1Ab protein in 5307 hybrids. This was evident whether 5307 corn was tested as a stand

- alone event or whether it was combined with mCry3A in MIR604 corn.

Fig ure VIII

- 2 . Rootworm e fficacy of 5307, MIR604 x 5307, and MIR604 corn hybrids;

Illinois and Minnesota trials, 2005

- 2009.

Western corn rootworm was the predominant rootworm species in the Illinois trials, while mixed infestations of western and northern corn rootworms were present in the Minnesota trials. 

## 0.05 0.05 0.17 1.75

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

5307 MIR604x5307 MIR604 Negative Control Mean root damage ratings, 0.01

– 3.0 rating scale 

### Natural rootworm infestation, preceded by trap cucurbit crop in prior season 

# 5 years, 21 locations5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 134 of 211 VIII.C. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of eCry3.1Ab



### Data on the concentration of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 corn were used to calculate the estimate d environmental concentrations (EEC s ) o f eCry3.1Ab for groups of organisms potentially exposed via 5307 corn . Estimates of exposure based on conservative assumptions about the dilution of eCry3.1Ab in prey and in soil have been made. Additionally, conserv ative assumptions about eCry3.1Ab concentrations in bodies of water near corn cultivation are a s have been made. The EECs derived are suitable for protecting populations of nontarget organisms. Potential exposures and risks for endangered and threatened s pecies are addressed separately in Part VIII.F

. , below.

VIII.C.1. Concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 Corn


### The concentration of eCry3.1Ab was measured by enzyme

- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in several corn tissues and whole plants at four growth sta ges : whorl, anthesis, seed maturity and senescence (refer to Table VI

- 2 ). The values chosen for computation of

EECs are shown in Table VIII

- 4 . These values represent the mean 8 

### eCry3.1Ab

concentration across four locations at the 5307 hybrid corn growth stage with the highest expression level . EECs were calculated from eCry3.1Ab tissue concentrations expressed on

a fresh

- weight basi s.

Table VIII

- 4 . Tissue concentrations of eCry3.1Ab used for computation of EECs.

Highest mean concentrations of eC ry3.1Ab as determined by ELISA in tissues of 5307 corn hybrids grown in four field locations. All values are reported on a fresh

- weight basis and are corrected for extraction efficiency

.
Tissue eCry3.1Ab (μg/g) Growth stage

Leaf 25.33 Maturity

Kernel 4.56 Maturity

Root 5.54 Whorl

Pollen 0.14 Anthesis a

Whole plants 15.78 Whorl

a Extraction efficiency could not be derived for pollen samples, due to very low eCry3.1Ab concentrations. However, the data have been adjusted using conservative estimates of extraction efficiency for this tissue.

8 Because these values represent the mean eCry3.1Ab concentrations at the growth stage with the highest expression level, they represent a conservative estimate for risk assessment purposes, and are appropriate for estimating potential exposure at a population level. Although a rare individual organism might theoretically be exposed to the highest single eCry3.1Ab concentration observed among all samples of a relevant tissue type, any such exposu re is likely to be relatively brief and represent only a small portion of the total diet of the organism. This contrasts to the extended exposure to a continuous, no

- choice eCry3.1Ab

- treated diet in laboratory studies using nontarget indicator organisms; these factors represent additional sources of conservatism in the risk assessment, because they are unlikely to occur under natural conditions. The approach used for deriving EECs herein is similar to that used by Raybould et al. (2007) and Raybould and V lachos (2010) for other insecticidal corn varieties.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 135 of 211 VIII.C.2. Fate of eCry3.1Ab in Soil


### Most proteins do not persist or accumulate in soil because they are inherently degradable in

soils that have normal microbial populations ( e.g.
, Burns

, 1982; Marx et al.

, 2005). Multiple investigations have demonstrated that Cry proteins from B. thuringiensis are rapidly degraded in a variety of soil types and that the proteins do not accumulate (Mendelsohn et
al.

, 2003; Head et al.

, 2002; Dubelman et al.

, 2005). There is no evidence that they accumulate in soil or are protected from the activity of proteases in soil.

A laboratory study was conducted to examine the fate of eCry3.1Ab in live soil. For this investigation, l ive soil representing a loam soil texture w as used to examine the rate at which eCry3.1Ab biological activity declined . Microbially produced eCry3.1Ab (in test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208; see P arts VI.A.1.a and VI.A.1.b. ) was added to the s oil at a concentration of 50 μg/g dry weight

- equivalent soil. A rapid decline in eCry3.1Ab bioactivity was observed. There was no biological activity detected above background

control levels after 14 days of eCry3.1Ab incubation in live soil. The result s of this study

demonstrate that eCry3.1Ab biological activity is rapidly lost in healthy soils.

VIII.C.3. Expected eCry3.1Ab Environmental Concentrations for Nontarget Organisms


### This section provides conservative estimates of environmental concentratio ns of eCry3.1Ab for multiple classes of nontarget organisms that may be exposed via cultivation of 5307

corn . Exposure through soil run

- off or gene flow is unlikely for the reasons stated elsewhere in the petition (see Parts VIII.C.2

. and VIII .I. ) and is not considered. The approach to estimating environmental exposures for eCry3.1Ab is similar to that previously described

for insect

- control events MIR604 corn (Raybould et al.

, 2007) and MIR162 corn (Raybould

and Vlachos

, 2010).

VIII .C.3.a. EEC for Wild Birds



### Some birds such as crows ( Corvus brachyrhynchos ), grackles ( Quiscalus quiscula ) and sandhill cranes ( Grus canadensis ) uproot sprouting corn to feed on the germinating kernels (e.g., Steffey et al.

, 1999; Blackwell et al.

, 2001; Sterner et al

. , 2003 ). Blackbirds typically slit open husks with their bills and puncture kernels in the milk stage ( Steffey et al.

, 1999).

Blackbirds are also common in corn stubble where they forage for spilled kernels and weed seeds (Linz et al.

, 2003). Therefore, the exposure of wild birds to eCry3.1Ab via cultivation

of 5307 corn was estimated using the concentration of eCry3.1Ab in kernels.

The mean eCry3.1Ab concentration at the growth stage with the highest concentrations in

5307 corn ker nels was 4.56 μg eCry3.1Ab/g fresh weight (Table VIII

- 4 ). Exposure to birds may be expressed more suitably as a daily dietary dose (DDD), which is given by a simple formula (Crocker et al.

, 2002):

DDD = FIR

bw × C

where FIR = daily food intake rate; bw = body weight; and C = concentration of eCry3.1Ab

in food.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 136 of 211 

### FIR/bw ratios for cereal seed

- eating birds consuming fresh food were estimated by Crocker

et al. (2002). Among the seven species represented, ratios range from 0.11 (g seeds/g bw) for the phe asant ( Phasianus colchicus ) to 0.35 for the tree sparrow ( Passer montanus ); these species also represent the extreme range of body weights, i.e.

, 22 g for the sparrow to 953 g for the pheasant. Because smaller birds (e.g.

, the tree sparrow) have a higher food intake rate compared to body mass, and hence a higher DDD, the estimate of risk using the higher

ratio of FIR/bw is more conservative.

Wild birds are unlikely to consume a diet of 100% corn kernels. A conservative estimate of exposure can be derived from the proportion of corn kernels in the diet of birds feeding in

corn growing areas. Studies by McNichol et al. (1979) and Homan et al . (1994) of the diets

of red

- winged blackbirds and common grackles, respectively, showed that corn kernels comprise up to 50% of their diet. An EEC for wild birds can be calculated based on a diet of

50% 5307 corn kernels containing 4.56 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels. This yields a conservative

EEC for wild birds of:

0.5 × 4.56 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g kernels = 2.2 8 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g kernels

With a DDD for wild birds of:

0.5 × 0.35 g kernels/g bw × 4.56 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g kernels = 0.80 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g bw

VIII.C.3.b. EEC for Wild Mammals


### The main potential route of exposure of wild mammals to eCry3.1Ab in 5307 corn is consumption of kernels. Rodents such as thirteen

- lined ground squirrels ( Spermophilus

tridecemlineatus ), deer mice ( Peromysus maniculatus ), house mice ( Mus domesticus ), prairie and meadow voles ( Microtus spp.), and woodchucks ( Marmota monax ) feed on

g erminating corn seeds.

Larger mammals such as white

- tailed deer ( Odocoilus virginianus ) and raccoons ( Procyon

lotor ) cause injury to ripening ears. Deer typically nip off ear tips, whereas raccoons chew through husks.

The mean eCry3.1Ab concentration at the growth stage with the highest concentrations in

5307 corn kernels was 4.56 μg/g fresh weight (Table VIII

- 4 ). As with birds, exposure to

wild mammals may be expressed more suitably as a daily dietary dose (DDD) calcu lated by

the formula in Part VIII.C.3.a , above.

Crocker et al. (2002) estimated the ratio of daily food intake and body weight (FIR/bw) for several rodent species. The ratios for the harvest mouse ( Micromys minutus ) and the wood mouse ( Apodemus sylvaticu s ) consuming cereal seeds are 0.33 and 0.28, resp ectively. Higher FIR/bw ratios give higher DDDs, and therefore more conservative estimates of risk.

Wild mammals are unlikely to consume a diet of 100% corn kernels. A conservative

exposure estimate can b e deriv ed from the proportion of corn kernels in the diet of rodents5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 137 of 211 

### feeding in corn growing areas. The proportion of corn kernels in wild rodent diets varies greatly according to species (Houtcooper

, 1978; Ellis et al.

, 199 8 ), but can be up to 73%.

An E EC can therefore be calculated based on a diet of 73% corn kernels containing 4.56 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels. These estimates give a conservative EEC for wild mammals of:

0.73 × 4.56 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels = 3.33 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels

with a DDD for wild mammals of :

0.73 × 0.33 g kernels/g bw × 4.56 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g kernels = 1.10 μ g eCry3.1Ab/g b w

VIII.C.3.c. EEC for Pollinators



### Honey bees could potentially forage for corn pollen (Severson and Perry

, 1981) and

therefore c ould be exposed to eCry3.1Ab via 5307 pollen. Honey bees can successfully rear young on a diet of 100% corn pollen; however, it is unlikely that corn pollen regularly comprises more than 50% of their diet (Babendreier et al.

, 2004). Assuming a diet of 5 0%

5307 corn pollen at the mean p ollen concentration of eCry3.1Ab (Table VIII

- 4 ) , a conservative EEC for honey bees and other pollinators is:

0.5 × 0.14 μg eCry3.1Ab/g pollen = 0.07 μg eCry3.1Ab/g pollen

VIII.C.3.d. EEC for Above

- Ground Nontarget Arthropods



### Non target arthropods rarely, if ever, eat leaves of corn plants . The more likely route of exposure to transgenic proteins is consumption of prey that have fed on corn plants (e.g.,

Harwood et al.

, 2005), or consumption of pollen if prey are scarce (Coll and Guershon

, 2002).

The concentration of eCry3.1Ab in the prey of nona target arthropods will vary depending on the prey species, its developmental stage, and the concentration of eCry3.1Ab in plant parts on which they are feeding. Several studies have exami ned the concentration of Cry proteins in herbivores relative to the concentration of plants on which they are feeding; most tested the concentration of Cry1Ab in herbivores feeding on Bt corn (Head et al.

, 2001; Raps et al.

, 2001; Dutton et al.

, 2002; Obri st et al.

, 2005; Obrist et al. , 2006a, 2006 b), and other studies have been published that examine herbivores feeding on cotton and oilseed rape expressing Cry1Ac (Torres et al.

, 2006; Howald et al.

, 2003).

In general, the results show that herbivorous arthropods contain lower concentrations of Bt toxin than the plants on which they are feeding. Sucking insects, such as aphids, contain only trace amounts of Cry1Ab when feeding on Bt corn (Head et al.

, 2001; Raps et al.

, 2001;

Dutton et al.

, 2002; Obrist et al.

, 2006a). Lepidopteran larvae contain between 0.1 and 0.25X the concentration of Cry1Ab in Bt corn on which they are feeding (Raps et al.

, 2001;

Dutton et al.

, 2002; Obrist et al.

, 2006b), and similar r esults were obtained by Torres et al. (2006) with Spodoptera exigua feeding on cotton expressing Cry1Ac. Thrips ( Frankliniella

tenuicornis ) contain up to 0.35X the concentration of Cry1Ab in Bt corn , although this5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 138 of 211 

### concentration is transitory; adults conta in about half this amount and pupae less than 1/40th the concentration in larvae (Obrist et al.

, 2005). The herbivores with the highest concentrations of Cry protein are spider mites ( Tetranychus urticae ); they have been found

to contain between 0.7 and a pproximately 4.6X the concentration of Cry1Ab in Bt corn (Dutton et al.

, 2002; Obrist et al. , 2006a, 2006 b; Alvarez

- Alfageme et al.

, 2008).

A precise conservative EEC is difficult to set giv en the variety of food that non target arthropods are likely to consume. Setting the EEC at 0.2X the overall mean le af concentration at the highest

- expressing developmental stage seems reasonably conservative as many lepidopteran larvae contain less than this amount, and aphids and eggs of Lepidoptera contain consider ably less. Spider mites may contain higher concentrations of eCry3.1Ab than leaf tissue, and serious outbreaks of spider mites can occur in corn
, particularly under drought (Holtzer et al.

, 1988). However, most predators in corn fields are generalist fee ders that do not depend on a single pest species for food (Steffey et al.

, 1999), and, therefore, nontarget arthropods are highly unlikely to consume a diet comprising solely spider mites.

Possible exceptions are the specialist spider mite predators Ste thorus spp. (Coccinellidae). S. punctillum is found in corn (e.g., Obrist et al.

, 2006a), and third instars and adults of this species preferentially eat spider mite eggs (Ragkou et al.

, 2004), which are likely to contain

low , if any, concentrations of to xin compared with adult mites. Experiments have been conducted to examine the transfer of Cry toxins to S. punctillum via prey consumption.

Alvarez

- Alfageme (2008) observed that the concentration of Cry1Ab in spider mites was 4.6 times greater than the c oncentration in corn leaves

, while the concentration in S. punctillum

adults was about 50% of the corn leaf concentration. Li and Romeis (2010) observed that

the Cry3Bb1 concentration in spider mites was 55.9% of the concentration in Bt corn leaves

, while larvae of S. punctillum that were supplied with only Bt

- corn

- reared mites for three or six days contained 10.6% or 7.5% , respectively, of the Cry3Bb1 concentration measured in leaves. After longer exposure to Bt

- corn reared mites (up to 56 days) the conc entration of Cry3Bb1 in S. punctillum was even lower

, indicating that the Cry protein did not accumulate (Li and Romeis 2010).

Hence, 0.2X the leaf concentration of eCry3.1Ab is a reasonably conservative EEC.

The mean eCry3.1Ab concentration measured in above

- ground tissue of 5307 corn at the growth stage with the highest expression wa s 25.33 μg/g leaf ( at maturity) (Table VIII

- 4 )

. The conservative EEC for above

- ground non target arthropods is:

0.2 × 25.33 μg eCry3.1Ab/g fresh weight diet = 5. 07 μg eCry3.1Ab/g fresh weight diet

VIII.C.3.e. EEC for Soil

- Dwelling Nontarget Invertebrates



### A conservative EEC for soil

- dwelling nontarget invertebrates can be calculated as the concentration of eCry3.1Ab in soil following incorporation of corn plants into soil post

harvest. The best estimate of the eCry3.1Ab concentration i n plants post

- harvest is the concentration at senescence; however

, a conservative EEC was calculated using the5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 139 of 211 

### eCry3.1Ab concentration in whole plants at the 5307 plant growth stage with the highest

mean concentration.

The t ypical planting density of corn in the U.S. is 65,500 plants per hectare and the average fresh weight of a corn plant is 750 g. Using the mean whole

- plant eCry3.1Ab concentration of 15.78 μg eCry3.1Ab/g fresh we ight at the 5307 corn growth stage with the highest levels (Table VIII

- 4 ), one hectare (ha) of 5307 corn contains:

65,500 plants /ha × 750 g/plant × 15.78 μg eCry3.1Ab/g = 7.75 × 10 8 

### μg eCry3.1Ab /ha

If the corn is plowed into the top 15 cm of soil, the eCry3.1Ab will be incorporated into 100 m × 100 m × 0.15 m = 1,500 m 3 

### of so il per hectare. The average density of soil is 1,500 kg/m 3 

### and

, therefore

, the corn will be incorporated into 1,500 m 3 

### /ha x 1,500 kg/m 3



### = 2,250,000 kg soil per hectare. Dividing the amount of eCry3.1Ab per hectare by the mass of soil per hectare gives the realistic EEC for soil organisms of:

7.75 × 10 8



### × μg eCry3.1Ab ha

× 1 kg soil

= 0.34 μg eCry3.1Ab

ha 2,250,000 kg soil 1000 g soil g soil

VIII.C.3.f. EEC for Aquatic Organisms


### A potential route of exposure of aquatic organisms to eCry3.1Ab is through 5307 pollen deposited in to water bodies adjacent to corn fields. However, corn pollen is heavy and

wind

- borne pollen densities decrease rapidly from the source ( e.g.
, Luna et al.

, 2001)

. Corn anthesis lasts for up to 14 days, and any pollen deposited into water bodies from adjacent fields during this period is unlikely to remain in suspension ( Webster et al.

, 1999). In addition, the bioactivity of eCry3.1Ab is likely to degrade in pollen grains suspended in water for 14 days (e.g.

, Pusch et al.

, 1998). The very low concentration of eCry3.1Ab in

5307 corn pollen (0.14 μ g/g, Table V III

- 4 ), along with the limited dispersal of pollen and likely eCry3.1Ab degradability in the environment

, indicates that any exposure to eCry3.1Ab from 5307 corn pollen via water would be negligible

.

The transfer of unharvested corn material to aquatic sy stems has been studied in water bodies adjacent to fields. Litter traps set alongside streams collected corn by

- products of up to 7.9 g ash

- free dry mass (AFDM)/m 2 

### over a year, while benthic sediments contained up to 6.4 g AFDM/m 2 

### (Rosi

- Marshall et al.

, 2 007). Jensen et al. (2010) observed that input of crop by

- products into waterways was highest several months after field harvest.

Significant degradation of protein is likely to occur during the period between harvest and transfer to the waterways. Add itionally, analysis of 5307 corn tissues by ELISA showed that the mean concentration of eCry3.1Ab was the lowest at senescence (see Table VI

- 2 );

the plant stage from which most post

- harvest plant debris will originate.

Cry1Ab activity was not detectable in target organism bioassays after Bt corn leaves containing the protein were incubated for two weeks in a terrestrial habitat (Jensen et al.

,5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 140 of 211 

### 2010). Because many environmental parameters may affect the concentration of eCry3.1Ab present in 5307 corn crop by

- products entering waterways

, it is difficult to predict the

concentration to which aquatic invertebrates would be exposed

. H owever
, any resulting aquatic concentrations of eCry3.1Ab are expected to be far below those at which biological activity is observed among known eCry3.1Ab

- sensitive species

.

Nevertheless, a conservative risk assessment was conducted based on a worst

- case

- exposure scenario to aquatic organisms of a diet comprised of 100% corn leaf tissue; this tissue had the highest measured concentration of eCry3.1Ab ( Table VIII

- 4 )

.

VIII.C.3.g. EEC for Farmed Fish



### About 30% corn grain by weight is typical in commercial fish feed s used in aquaculture (National Research Council

, 1983). Fish feed is heat

- treated during preparation and

, therefore

, it is likely that eCry3.1Ab would, to at least some extent, be denatured and lose activity in feed prepared from 5307 corn grain. However, a worst

- case assumption is that no activity is lost.

Corn in fish feed is unlikely to comprise 100% 5307 grain. Insect

- protected corn comprised approximately 63% of corn acres planted in the United States in 20 10 (USDA

- NASS, 20 10 ). In the unlikely event that 5307 corn obtains 50% market share of insect

- protected corn , and using the conservative assumption of no degradation of eCry3.1Ab, the conservative EEC for farmed fish would be a diet consisting of 9.5% Event 5307 corn grain:

0.30 Event 5307 corn grain in fish feed × 0.63 US corn acres × 0. 5 market share = 9.5%.

VIII.C.3.h. Summary of Environmental Exposure Estimates


### Conservative EECs have been computed for groups of nontarget organisms that will be potentially exposed to eCry3.1Ab via cultivation of 5307 corn . These EEC values are compil ed in Table VIII

- 5 and are appropriate for estimating the risks to populations of nontarget organisms. Once defined, these EEC or DDD values can be directly compared to eCry3.1Ab exposure or dose levels that cause no adverse effects in test species. This comparison results in a toxicity exposure ratio (TER).

It is unlikely that nontarget organisms will be exposed to eCry3.1Ab in environments beyond corn cultivat ion

. Corn pollen does not drift great distances nor are corn seeds wind

borne. The transfer of plant material into waterways surrounding fields may occur ; however

, it is unlikely to result in ecologically relevant concentrations of eCry3.1Ab. The probability of spread of eCry3.1Ab beyond areas of corn cultivation through volunteers and

self

- sustaining feral populations of 5307 corn is also very low (see Part VIII.H

. ).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 141 of 211 Table VIII

- 5 . Tabulation of EEC and DDD values for nontarget organisms.

Each EEC value presented is based on the average concentration of eCry3.1Ab at the plant stage with the highest concentrations for that 5307 corn tissue and conservative estimates for consumption of these tissues by nontarget organisms. DDD values are com puted where appropriate.

Nontarget Organism Group Estimated Environmental Concentration (EEC) Daily Dietary Dose (DDD)

Birds 2.28 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels 0.80 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw

Wild mammals 3.33 μg eCry3.1Ab/g kernels 1.10 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw

Pollinator 0.07 μg eCry3.1Ab/g pollen

Above

- ground arthropods 5.07 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Soil

- dwelling invertebrates 0.34 μg eCry3.1Ab/g soil

Aquatic organisms 100% 5307 corn leaf tissue

Farmed fish 9.5% incorporation of 5307 corn grain in feed

VIII.D. Impact on Nontarget Organisms



### Eleven species representing groups of nontarget organisms potentially exposed to eCry3.1Ab via cultivation of 5307 corn were exposed to eCry3.1Ab via a microbial ly produced, purified protein preparation (test substance ECRY3.1 AB

- 0208, containing 89.6% eCry3.1Ab by weight; see Part VI.A.1.a. Production of eCry3.1Ab for Safety Testing ) or as 5307 corn tissue in laboratory bioassays

. T he purpose of these bioassays was to identify potential adverse effects and establish a no observable adverse effect concentration (NOAEC) or level (NOAEL). The source of eCry3.1Ab, test concentration or dose, and route of exposure in each study are listed in Table VIII

- 6

.

The microbially produced eCry3.1Ab protein is biochemically and functionally equivalent to the eCry3.1Ab produced in 5307 corn (see Part VI.A.1.b. Equivalence of eCry3.1Ab in Test

Substance and in 5307 Plants ); therefore, it is a suitable surrogate for use in tests of the effects of eCry3. 1Ab in 5307 corn

.

Positive assay controls were included in the honeybee, spotted ladybird beetle, flower bug, ground beetle, earthworm, and rove beetle studies to validate the bioassay methodology. Responses for test organisms exposed to the positive con trol substance were observed in all studies. The presence of eCry3.1Ab was confirmed in the freshwater shrimp and catfish diets using immunostrips specific for detecting eCry3.1Ab. The intactness, concentration, and bioactivity of eCry3.1Ab were confirme d in artificial diets and soil by Western blot analysis, ELISA and bioassay of sensitive coleopteran larvae, respectively.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 142 of 211 Table VIII

- 6

. Source of eCry3.1Ab used to assess the hazard to NTOs

.
Species Tested Source Route of exposure Concentration or dose

Bobwhite quail microbial eCry3.1Ab gelatin capsule 900 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw

Chicken 5307 corn grain incorporated in feed 0.34

- 2.13 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet (52

– 64% Event 5307 corn grain in diet)

Mouse microbial eCry3.1Ab gavage 2000 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw

Honeybee microbial eCry3.1Ab sucrose solution 50 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Spotted ladybird

beetle microbial eCry3.1Ab artificial diet 353 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Flower bug microbial eCry3.1Ab artificial diet 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Ground beetle microbial eCry3.1Ab artificial diet 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Rove beetle microbial eCry3.1Ab artificial diet 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet

Earthworm microbial eCry3.1Ab artificial soil 4.06 μg eCry3.1Ab/g soil

Freshwater shrimp 5307 corn leaf discs 100% Event 5307 corn leaf

discs

Channel catfish 5307 corn grain incorporated in feed 9.5% Event 5307 corn grain

VIII.D.1

. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Wild Birds

VIII.D.1. a Effect of eCry3.1Ab on bobwhite quail


### The bobwhite quail was tested as a representative of wild birds. Five male and five female juvenile bobwhite quail ( Colinus virginianus ) were exposed to a single dose of microbial

eC ry3.1Ab at 900 mg/kg bw by gelatin capsule. The effects on bird mortality, body weight and feed consumption were compared with a c ontrol group for 14 days after dosing. No adverse effects were observed in the treatment group and the NOAEL was shown to be 900 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw, the highest dose tested. Additionally, no difference in feed consumption was detected between the study g roups, and no abnormal behaviors were

observed among the test animals

.

VIII.D.1

. b Effect of eCry3.1Ab on broiler chickens



### B roiler chick en s ( Gallus gallus domesticus ) were exposed to eCry3.1Ab via starter, grower and finisher diets prepared from 5307 corn grain; the corn grain concentrations in the diets ranged from 52% to 64%. Nontransgenic, near

- isogenic corn grain and grain from a commercially available lot of corn were used to prepare negative control diets. The transgenic 5307 grain and near

- iso genic control grain were produced from field

- grown hybrid plants of genotypes NP2171 x NP2460 (BC5F 3 

### ) (5307) and NP2171 and NP2460, respectively , that were concurrently grown in the same location under USDA APHIS

notification 08

- 051

- 107n

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 143 of 211 

### The broilers were fed the diets for 49 days. The concentration of eCry3.1Ab in the starter, grower and finisher diets was 2.13 μg/g diet, 0.34 μg/g diet, and 0.38 μg/g diet, respectively;

these concentrations were corrected for extraction efficiency. Various endpoints we re measured, including mortality, body weight, carcass yield, and feed conversion ratio. There were no adverse effects of the eCry3.1Ab

- containing feed on any study parameter.

The results of this study are complementary to the acute toxicity study examini ng the effects of eCry3.1Ab on bobwhite quail ( Part VIII.D.1 .a. ) and support the hypothesis that

cultivation of 5307 corn will pose negligible risk to wild birds.

VIII.D.2. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Wild Mammals



### F ive male and five female mice ( Mus musculus ; strain Crl:CD

- 1) were exposed to a single dose of eCry3.1Ab, 2000 mg/kg bw by oral gavage. The effects on mortality and body weight were compared with a control group for 14 days after exposure, and multiple histological and biochemical endpoints were a ssessed at the end of the test. The test

substance was well tolerated. All mice survived without clinical signs of distress or impairment, and anatomical pathology results did not identify any specific target organ toxicity. The necropsies included, but were not limited to, examination of the external surface, all orifices, and the cranial, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic cavities, including

viscera. The organs examined included the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, Peyer’s patches, ileum, cecum, co lon, rectum, selected lymph nodes, spleen, and thymus.

There was no test substance

- related alteration in the prevalence, severity or histologic character of any incidental tissue alterations. There were no test substance

- related effects on body weight or food consumption. No adverse effects were observed in the treatment goup and the NOAEL was shown to be 2000 mg eCry3.1Ab/kg bw, the highest dose tested.

VIII.D.3. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Pollinators


### Honey bees were exposed to microbially produced eCry3 .1Ab following the guideline protocol of Oomen et al. (1992). The eCry3.1Ab was provided fresh daily to the bees at 50 μg/g diet in a 50% sucrose solution (200 ml diet/day) for the first five days of the study. The negative control diet for this treatmen t was 50% sucrose solution without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. The hives were spatially separated (4 hives/treatment) and the diet was placed

outside the hive. Worker bees collected the sucrose solutions and fed them to the brood. In each hive, 100 egg c ells and 100 larval cells were marked and the development of the brood in those cells was recorded at various assessment timepoints throughout the 24

- day study.

Pre

- imaginal mortality of brood (egg and larval cells) and the number of dead adult bees,

larv ae and pupae expelled from the hive were monitored and compared with the control group. Additionally, the condition of the hive was examined by measuring the relative proportions of brood and food cells within the hive.

There were no statistically signi ficant differences in 24

- day mortality between brood in hives exposed to diet containing eCry3.1Ab when compared to the negative control diet at any developmental stage. Treatment mortality, averaged over the replicates, was 38.2% and 2.3% for the egg and larval cells, respectively. Control mortality, averaged over the replicates, was 25.5% and 16.7% for egg and larval cells, respectively. The study guideline by Oomen et al. (1992) indicates that control mortality should not be, “generally above 15%.”5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 144 of 211 

### T his criterion was met for the larval cells, however it was not met for the egg cells. Both the

egg

- and larval

- cell data provide useful information to evaluate the effects of eCry3.1Ab on brood development, however

, the larval data are more robust because the control mortality meets the guideline recommendation . There was a statistically significant difference in mortality between brood in hives exposed to the toxic reference substance (diflubenzuron), 99.8% and 100% mortality for egg and larval cells

, re spectively, when compared to the negative control at all developmental stages.

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of dead adult bees expelled from the hive between the eCry3.1Ab treatment group (12.0 dead bees/hive) and

th e negative control (22.4 dead bees/hive). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of dead adult bees expelled from the hive between the toxic reference treatment group (25.3 dead bees/hive) and the negative control. Although the toxic

reference substance did not have an adverse effect on the survival of adult bees this is expected because the acute oral and contact toxicity of the reference substance is reported to be greater than 100 μg active ingredient/bee (Anon.

, 200 9 ); the ef fect on the brood was

ob vious as indicated by the high percent mortality in brood cells

. The low number of dead adult bees indicated that the honey bees were healthy during the observation period. Exposure to eCry3.1Ab did not adversely affect the colony condition.

Because the egg cell control mortality exceeded the level that the guideline recommends, a second larval honey bee study was conducted to investigate the effects of eCry3.1Ab on honey bees. In the second study

, the colony of honey bees was fed a 50 μg eCry3.1Ab/g sucrose solution fresh daily (200 g diet/day) for five days . The negative control diet for this treatment was 50% sucrose solution without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. The toxic reference substance (fenoxycarb) was also present ed to the bees in a 50% sucrose solution. Prior to

exposure
, at least 100 egg cells were marked in three replicate colonies per treatment (at least 300 egg cells/treatment). The diet was placed inside the colony and the colony was monitored for 22 days a fter the initiation of exposure to the diets. The brood termination rate (percentage of egg cells that did not develop into adults) and the number of dead bees expelled from the hive were monitored and compared with the control group. The overall

conditi on of the hive was also examined.

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean post

- feeding number of dead bees/hive/day between the control (15.7 dead bees/hive/day) and eCry3.1Ab treatment (14.4 dead bees/hive/day) groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean number of bees expelled from the hive after exposure to the toxic reference substance (178.6 dead bees/hive/day) when compared to the control. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean post

- feeding number of dead pupae/hive/day between the control group (0.6 dead pupae/hive/day) and the treatment group (0.9 dead pupae/hive/day). There was a statistically significant difference between the mean number of pupae expelled

from the hive after exposure to the toxic reference substance (118.3 dead pupae/hive/day) when compared to the control.

The mean brood termination rate was 20.0% for the control group, 7.9% for the treatment group and 24.2% for the reference substance group. In this s tudy the control mortality was5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 14 5 of 211 

### closer to the 15% level recommended by the Oomen et al. guideline (1992). The effects of the reference substance were not indicated by examining only the brood termination rate in isolation, however, effects of the toxic ref erence substance were demonstrated by the relatively large number of bees expelled from the hive. Fenoxycarb is a growth regulator

that is known to affect honey bees late in development (pupal stage, after the cells are capped). Due to the late

- acting na ture of the reference substance the cells marked as empty at the end of the monitoring period were assumed to have emerged successfully as adults. However, it is possible that dead pupae affected by the toxic reference substance were

instead removed from the cells by nurse bees. This is likely the case due to the large number of bees expelled from the hive with the sickle eye symptom, which is a commonly found in bees exposed to fenoxycarb. In summary, although the brood termination rate alone does

not s how effects of the toxic reference substance, the weight of evidence presented indicates that the honey bees were exposed to and affected by the reference substance.

Both of the honey bee studies demonstrated that exposure to eCry3.1Ab causes no adverse effects on survival, brood development, or the condition of the colonies.

VIII.D.4. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Above

- ground Arthropods

VIII.D.4.a. L adybeetle s



### Three

- to five

- day

- old spotted ladybird beetle larvae ( Coleomegilla maculata ) were exposed

to a nominal eCry3.1Ab concentration of 5 00 μg/g diet for 21 days

. The eCry3.1Ab protein was incorporated into a diet containing “bee pollen” (pollen collected by bees from various flowers) and Ephestia (moth) eggs. The negative control diet contained bee p ollen and Ephestia eggs without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. Potassium arsenate (a known stomach poison to many insects) mixed with the diet of bee pollen and Ephestia eggs was included in the study as the positive control substance. Forty individual larva e were treated in both the test group and the positive control group; due to a n error, only 30 larvae received the negative control treatment. Fresh diet was provided to individual larvae every other day, and any unconsumed diet from the previous feeding was removed. Diet analysis confirmed that the treatment group was exposed to at least 353 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet. Western blot analysis confirmed that eCry3.1Ab remained intact in the diet matrix, and bioassays confirmed that the diet was highly bioactive a gainst sensitive coleopteran larvae ( Leptinotarsa decemlineata ). The negative cont rol diet was confirmed to not contain eCry3.1Ab.

The survival and development of the larvae were monitored and compared to the negative control group. Larval mortality wa s 13.8% in the negative control group, 2.5% in the eCry3.1Ab

- treated group, and 100% in the positive control group. Larval pupation was 86.2% in the negative control group and 97.5% in the eCry3.1Ab

- treated group. Percent adult emergence was 92.0% in the negative control group and 97.4% in the eCry3.1Ab

- treated group. Adult beetle mortality was 14.3% in the negative control group and 10.5% in the eCry3.1Ab

- treated group. The above differences between the negative control and the treated group were not s tatistically significant. However, the larvae in the eCry3.1Ab

treated group developed into pupae significantly more quickly (mean of 9.6 days to pupate) than the larvae in the control group (mean of 12.0 days to pupate). Additionally, the adults5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 146 of 211 

### that em erged from the eCry3.1Ab treatment weighed significantly more (mean of 0.0142 g) than the negative controls (mean of 0.0118). However, these are not considered adverse

effects. Therefore, the NOAEC was shown to be 353 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet, the highest

con centration tested.

VIII.D.4.b. Flower bugs



### Second

- instar flower bugs ( Orius laevigatus ) were exposed to eCry3.1Ab via incorporation into an artificial, meat

- based diet at a rate of 400 μg/g diet. A negative control group was fed an artificial, meat

- based diet without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. A positive control group received the same diet treated with teflubenzuron. Each group contained 40 nymphs,

which were individually provided fresh diet daily for 12 days or until they became adults.

The positive control group had 100% mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between the treatment group (5% mortality) and the negative control group (0% mortality) . Therefore, the NOAEC was shown to be 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet, the highe st
concentration tested.

Analysis of the test diet by ELISA confirmed that eCry3.1Ab was present at the nominal concentration. Western blot analysis confirmed that eCry3.1Ab remained intact in the diet matrix, and bioassays confirmed that the diet was hi ghly bioactive against sensitive coleopteran larvae ( L

. decemlineata ). The negative cont rol diet was confirmed to not contain eCry3.1Ab.

VIII.D.5. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Soil

- dwelling Invertebrates

VIII.D.5.a. Carabid beetles



### Larvae of Poecilus cupreus , a carabid beetle (ground beetle) , were exposed to eCry3.1Ab

via an artificial, meat

- based diet containing 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet. The negative control group was fed an artificial, meat

- based diet without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. A positive control group received the same diet treated with teflubenzuron. Each group contained 40

larvae , which were individually provided fresh diet daily in their culture tubes until they ceased feeding as pre

- pupae ; the first pupae appeared in the cu lture tubes 27 days after

initiation of treatment. Thereafter, the emergence of adults was monitored.

There was no significant difference between the pre

- imaginal mortality of the eCry3.1Ab

treatment group (8%) and the negative control group (10%)

. Th e positive control group had 100% pre

- imaginal mortality. The time to adult emergence was longer (range of 4 1

- 55 days)

in the eCry3.1Ab treatment group compared to the negative control (range of 4 1

- 48 days) and there was a statistically significant differ ence between the mean weight of the adult

beetles from the treatment group (52.7 mg) and the control group (65.7 mg) , representing a 20% reduction in mean beetle weight. P. cupreus was tested under extreme exposure

concentrations , with continuous exposure to a nominal concentration of 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet throughout development, with no adverse effects on survival and minor effects on growth. Therefore, effects of eCry3.1Ab on ground beetles are likely to be negligible during field exposure.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 147 of 211 

### Analysis of the test diet by ELISA confirmed that eCry3.1Ab was present at a minimum of 362.2 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet, representing 90.6% of the nominal concentration. Western blot analysis confirmed that eCry3.1Ab remained intact in the diet matrix, and bioassays

confirmed that the test diet was highly bioactive against sensitive coleopteran larvae ( L

. decemlineata ). Based on the re sults for the three endpoints evaluated in the diet analysis study, it was assumed that eCry3.1Ab was present at the nominal concentration of 400 μg/g

diet. The negative control diet was confirmed to not contain eCry3.1Ab.

VIII.D.5.b. Rove beetles



### Adul t rove beetles ( Aleochara bilineata ) were exposed to eCry3.1Ab following the guideline protocol of Grimm et al. (2000) . The treatment group was fed an artificial, meat

based diet containing 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet. The negative control was the same artif icial,

meat

- based diet without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. A positive control group received the same diet treated with teflubenzuron. Each group contained a total of 80 beetles, allocated in four replicates of 20 beetles each (10 males and 10 females). The adult beetles were fed the treated diet for 35 days after which they were removed from the test arena and the parasitic success of their offspring from fly pupae was monitored. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of progeny from the treatment group ( 824)

and the control group (828), whereas no progeny were produced by the teflubenzuron

treated group . Therefore, the NOAEC was shown to be 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet, the highest concentration tested.

Analysis of the test diet by ELISA confirmed that eCry3.1Ab was present at a minimum of

78.1 % of the nominal concentration. Western blot analysis confirmed that eCry3.1Ab remained intact in the diet matrix, and bioassays confirmed that the test diet was h ighly bioactive against sensitive coleopteran larvae ( L

. decemlineata ). Based on the results for the three endpoints evaluated in the diet analysis study, it was assumed that eCry3.1Ab was present at the nominal concentration of 400 μg/g diet. The negati ve control diet was confirmed to not contain eCry3.1Ab.

VIII.D.5.c. Earthworms



### Adult earthworms ( Eisenia fetida ) were exposed to eCry3.1Ab via incorporation into an

artificial soil substrate at a rate equivalent to 50 μg eCry3.1Ab/g dry wt of soil

. The artificial soil was comprised of 10% w/w sphagnum peat

, 20% w/w kaolinite clay

, 69.8% w/w industrial quartz sand , and 0.2% w/w calcium carbonate to adjust the soil pH to 6 ± 0.5.

The negative control group was placed in the same artificial soil substrate but without the addition of eCry3.1Ab. Each group contained a total of 40 worms, allocated in four replicates of 10 worms each. The treatment and control groups were monitored for 14 days. The stock earthworm culture used for this study was shown to have the expected sensitivity to chloroacetamide, a positive control substance, when mixed into artificial soil. There was

100% survival in both the eCry3.1Ab

- treat ed and control groups and ther e were no statistically significant differences in the change in biomass between the groups. There were

no visible lesions or effects on earthworm behavior observed in the study.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 148 of 211 

### Analysis of the treated soil sampled at test initiation by ELISA confirm ed that the E. fetida were exposed to at least 4.06 μg eCry3.1Ab/g dry weight soil

. The relatively low recovery of eCry3.1Ab by ELISA likely reflects the physicochemical properties of the soil matrix, because low recovery was also seen in direct eCry3.1Ab spike and recovery experiments with the same artificial soil matrix. Western blot analysis indicated that eCry3.1Ab remained substantially intact in the artificial soil, and bioassays of L. decemlineata fed diets containing the treated soil indicated tha t the eCry3.1Ab retained bioactivity in the artificial

soil matrix. Thus , it is likely that the earthworms were exposed to higher test concentrations than indicated by the ELISA results. Nevertheless, T he NOAEC was shown to be 4.06 μg eCry3.1Ab/g soil, t he highest concentration of eCry3.1Ab measured in the soil. The soil used in the negative control treatment was confirmed to not contain eCry3.1Ab.

VIII.D.6. Effect of eCry3.1Ab on Aquatic Organisms

VIII.D.6.a. Freshwater shrimp



### Gammarid freshwater shrimp ( Gammarus fasciatus ) were selected as the test species

because they are easily cultured and are sensitive to a variety of toxic substances. This species has also been observed to feed on leaves by shredding (Arsuffi and Suber kropp

, 1989) , which makes it suitable for testing the effects of transgenic corn leaves containing pesticidal proteins. Forty adult gammarids were exposed to a diet comprised of 100% 5307

corn leaf tissue ; no other source of food was provided

. The same n umber in a negative control group were fed a diet of nontransgenic, near

- isogenic corn leaf tissue. For each treatment group, the gammarids were contained in four replicate one

- liter glass vessels of fresh water, each containing ten organisms. Corn leaf discs were pre

- soaked in the culture water prior to introducing fresh leaf discs to each culture vessel daily. The effects on

survival in the group exposed to 5307 leaf tissue were compared with the control group. The study was terminated at day 5 becaus e control mortality reached 20%. At study termination, mortality was 12% in the 5307 corn treatment group. Typically

, mortality caused by Cry proteins to sensitive target larvae occurs within three to five days of exposure

, therefore, biologically meaningful conclusions can be drawn from this study. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between G. fasciatus fed the 5307 corn leaf tissue and those fed the nontransgenic, near

- isogenic control corn leaf tissue. Examination of the leaf discs confirmed that the gammarids had consumed leaf tissue. Analysis of the

leaf discs by immunostrip assay confirmed that eCry3.1Ab was present in the 5307 corn tissue, as expected, and absent from the control corn leaf tissue.

VIII.D.6.b. Channel catfish



### Juvenile channel catfish ( Ictalurus punctatus ) were exposed to 5307 corn grain via a pelleted diet. The diet was made by incorporating 41% 5307 corn grain into a fish diet formulation (prepared with typical ingredie nts) and using a “cold

- pelleting” process

, which minimized heating that could denature the eCry3.1Ab protein. (Standard, commercial fish diets are pelletted at higher temperatures to promote feed efficiency.) The negative control diet was prepared in the same manner using grain from nontransgenic, near

- isogenic corn

. The transgenic 5307 grain and near

- isogenic control grain used to prepare these diets were produced from field

- grown hybrid plants of genotypes NP2171 x NP2460 (BC3F 5 

### ) (5307)5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 149 of 211 

### and NP2171 and NP 2460, respectively, that were concurrently grown in the same location

under USDA APHIS notification 08

- 0 85

- 10 5 n

.

Four separate aquaria containing 20 catfish each (i.e., 80 total fish) were tested in each group, which received feed daily at the rate of approximately 8% of the fish biomass. The effects on survival and growth were compared for a 28

- day observation peri od. There was 100% survival in both study groups. There were no statistically significant differences in mean total biomass, mean weight gain and feed conversion ratios. There were no adverse

effects observed when 5307 corn grain was incorporated as 41% of the catfish diet. An immunostrip test confirmed that eCry3.1Ab was present in the treated fish diet and absent

from the control diet.

VIII.E. Toxicity Exposure Ratios for Nontarget Organisms



### The EEC and DDD values are compared with results of eCry3.1 Ab hazard studies in order to make judgements about risk. The effects studies identified any potential for eCry3.1Ab proteins to cause adverse effects in representative nontarget organism species applicable for

a corn ecosystem. In each study, a represen tative species was exposed to a high concentration or dose of eCry3.1Ab. No harmful effect of such exposure on survival was observed in any species tested, and the concentration of eCry3.1Ab in each study can be interpreted as the minimum value of the NOA EC for the mortality endpoint. Computing a ratio of the NOAEC to the EEC or DDD results in the toxicity exposure ratio (TER). This ratio is also known as the ‘margin of exposure’ or ‘margin of safety

. ’ A TER ≥ 1.0 provides a degree of confidence that th e absence of adverse effects in these hazard studies with indicator species is predictive of the safety of eCry3.1Ab in cultivation of 5307 corn for nontarget organisms in general. The larger the TER

, the higher the degree of confidence in the safety judg ement and the lower the risk. Table VIII

- 7 contains the NOAEC and corresponding TER values for each indicator test species.

No adverse effects in mortality were observed in any study that exposed representative nontarget organisms to eCry3.1Ab. The conc entration of eCry3.1Ab tested in the studies

was sufficient to achieve TERs of ≥ 1 for all species based on conservative EEC values.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 150 of 211 Table VIII

- 7 Nontarget organism TER values for eCry3.1Ab.

TER values are computed as the ratio of NOAEC: EEC (or NOAEC : DDD) and are b ased on estimates of exposure to eCry3.1Ab via cultivation of 5307 corn

.

Test Species NOAEC /NOAEL EEC or DDD TER

Bobwhite quail 900 mg/kg bw 0.80 mg/kg bw 1100

Mouse 2000 mg/kg bw 1.10 mg/kg bw 1800

Honeybee 50 μg/g diet 0.07 μg/g diet 710

Spotted ladybird beetle 353 μg/g diet 5.07 μg/g diet 70

Flower bug 400 μg/g diet 5.07 μg/g diet 79

Carabid beetle 400 μg/g diet 0.34 μg/g diet 1 1200 (mortality) < 1200 (weight)

Rove beetle 400 μg/g diet 0.34 μg/g diet 1200

Earthworm 4.06 μg/g soil 0.34 μg/g diet 12

Freshwater shrimp 100% 5307 corn < 100% 5307 corn > 1 a

Farmed fish 41% 5307 corn grain 9.5% 5307 corn grain 4.3

1 This NOAEC is based on the mortality endpoint for this species; a 20% reduction in weight was observed at this test

concentration , the only concentration tested

.
a

VIII.F. Safety Assessment for Endangered and Threatened Species

Limitations of the study design precluded a higher TER for freshwater shrimp. The test organism is a leaf shredder, and

therefore leaves of 5307 corn were provided as the source of eCry3.1Ab in the study; higher test concentrations could not be achieved using leaves. However, the test diet consisted of 100% 5307 corn leaves for the duration of the study (in comparison to the low and intermittent exposu res that might occur under more realistic exposure scenarios) and thus, represented a very conservative exposure scenario.



### No effects of eCry3.1Ab protein on mortality were observed in any of the species tested. These studies with a wide range of taxa demonstrate that there is negligible risk associated with exposure to estimated environmental concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in 5307 corn (see

Table VIII

- 7 ). There is a weight of evidence that at concentrations in 5307 corn the toxicity of eCry3.1Ab will be limited to the family Chrysomelidae in the order Coleoptera. Its
receptor

- mediated mechanism of action and absence of activity in bioassays with multip le species outside the order Coleoptera and outside the family Chrysomelidae support this

conclusion.

As shown in Table VIII

- 8 , currently there are 17 species of Coleoptera listed as endangered or threatened species by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (U S FWS, 2010). None of these is from the same family that are potentially susceptible to eCry3.1Ab at concentrations resulting from the cultivation of 5307 corn

. Moreover, due to their feeding habits and non

agricultural habitats, none of these species is expected to be exposed to eCry3.1Ab directly

from 5307 corn plants, and any indirect exposure (e.g., through prey consumption) would be negligible. None of the listed species is known to feed on corn or have host plants near corn fields. Most are predat ory and consume other insects; some are detritivores or consume

carrion. Several are aquatic species, or inhabit saline wetlands, mud flats, stream edges, aquifers, or b eaches; others inhabit caves. Therefore, due to a lack of exposure to corn as5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 151 of 211 

### well as likely insensitivity to eCry3.1Ab at concentrations in 5307 corn , no endangered or threatened beetles are expected to be harmed by eCry3.1Ab produced in 5307 corn hybrids.

In 2010, the U.S. EPA completed an extensive review of the data and information

sup porting the continued registration of several Cry protein “active ingredients” in Bt corn products, including multiple rootworm

- control products (US EPA, 2010 b ; 2010 c ; 2010e). In all cases, EPA concluded that these products did not pose a risk to any enda ngered or

threatened Coleoptera or other nontarget species listed by the US Fish and Wild l ife Service. Additionally, EPA determined that there would be no indirect effects on endangered or threatened plant species, such as impacts on pollinators that are important and/or essential to

an y endangered or threatened plant.

Table VIII

- 8

. Threatened or endangered Coleoptera listed by the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service.

Order: Family Genus + Species Status

Coleoptera: Carabidae Elaphrus viridis Threatened

Rhadine persephone Endangered

Rhadine exilis Endangered

Rhadine infernalis Endangered

Cicindela dorsalis dorsalis Threatened

Cicindela ohlone Endangered

Cicindela puritan a Threatened

Cicindela nevadica lincolniana Endangered

Coleoptera: Staphylinidae Batrisodes venyivi Endangered

Texamaurops reddelli Endangered

Batrisodes texanus Endangered

Coleoptera: Silphidae Nicrophorus americanus Endangered

Coleoptera: Dryopidae Stygoparnus comalensis Endangered

Coleoptera: Elmidae Heterelmis comalensis Endangered

Coleoptera: Haliplidae Brychius hungerfordi Endangered

Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae Polyphylla barbata Endangered

Coleoptera: Cerambycidae Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Threatened

VIII.G. Conclusion of Low Environmental Risk



### No adverse effects on survival were associated with exposures of eCry3.1Ab in a range of indicator species appropriate for a corn ecosystem. There was an effect , a 20% reduction in adult beetle weight

, observed after larvae of P. cupreus were exposed to 400 μg eCry3.1Ab/g diet throughout their development

. Because the P. cupreus larvae were tested at extreme exposure concentrations with no adverse effects on survival and only minor5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 152 of 211 

### effects on growth

, the effects of eCry3.1Ab on gr ound beetles are likely to be negligible during field exposure. The exposures in all studies were in excess of EEC or DDD levels for the nontarget organism groups represented, indicating a low probability of harm to these groups from exposure of eCry3.1Ab via cultivation of 5307 corn

.

VIII.H. Gene Flow Assessment



### An assessment of the environmental fate of eCry3.1Ab resulting from the cultivation of

5307 corn requires consideration not only of the production and degradation of the protein

within corn f ields, but also the possibility that eCry3.1Ab could persist, or spread from,

areas of corn cultivation because of gene flow or the establishment of weedy populations of

5307 corn . It is highly unlikely that eCry3.1Ab will appear in environments outside o f

cultivated corn

. Corn pollen does not drift great distances nor are corn seeds wind

- borne. The probability of spread of eCry3.1Ab outside corn cultivation through volunteers and self

sustaining feral populations of 5307 corn is also very low.

As descr ibed in Part VII above, 5307 corn is not phenotypically or compositionally different

from conventional corn other than in its ability to resist insect feeding damage. Thus, 5307

corn has not acquired any properties indicative of increased weediness potential. The

likelihood that the ecry3.1Ab gene will move to other species as a result of either vertical or horizontal gene transfer is also extremely low.

VIII.I. Gene Flow to Wild Sp ecies



### Z. mays L. subsp. mays hybridizes with a group of taxa collectively called teosinte. Several types of teosinte are classified as subspecies of Zea mays , whereas others are regarded as separate species of Zea . Teosinte species are natives of Central America and have co

existed with cultivated varieties despite occasional introgression (Baltazar et al.

, 2005). Teosinte species are not natives of the US, but isolated populations have been recorded in Florida and Texas, the former a possible remnant of the use of annual teosinte as a forage grass. These populations are apparently now extinct in both states. Teosinte species are grown in botanical gardens, but as corn pollen is heavy and relatively short

- lived ( e.g., EPA

, 2010 d ; Byrne and Fromherz

, 200 3 ; Devos et al.

, 2005), fertilization of these plants with pollen from 5307 corn is extremely unlikely.

Species of the genus Tripsacum are considered close relatives of Zea species and some theories postulate that a Tripsacum species may be a progenitor o f domesticated corn via hybridization and introgression with teosinte ( e.g.
, Poggio et al.

, 2005). There are sixteen species of Tripsacum worldwide, of which three occur in the US: T. dactyloides , a widespread forage grass; T. floridanum , known from southern Florida; and T. lanceolatum

, which is present in Arizona and possibly New Mexico (EPA

, 20 1 0 d ).

Corn breeders view Tripsacum as a potential source of useful genes for traits including apomixes, pest and disease resistance, and drought tolerance (OECD 2003). Therefore,

substantial effort has been made to obtain and characterize corn

- by

- Tripsacum hybrids. Hybrids between corn and Tripsacum species are difficult to obtain outside the laboratory or5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 153 of 211 

### greenhouse, and are often sterile. Onl y one record exists of an open

- pollinated hybrid

between Zea and Tripsacum , which involved species native to Guatemala. After consultation with experts on improvement of forage grasses, the EPA (20 1 0 d ) concluded that the chance of natural introgression of genes from corn to Tripsacum was ‘extremely remote’ and that no other species in the continental US would interbreed with commercial

corn

.

These observations indicate a very low probability for transfer of the ecry3.1Ab gene from

5307 corn to wild relati ves in the US. Species of Zea other than corn are not recorded outside botanical gardens in the US. Tripsacum dactyloides is widespread, but does not hybridize readily with Z. mays , and the probability of backcross of F 2

VIII.J. Potential for Horizontal Gene Transfer 

### progeny of Tripsacum

- by

- Zea hybri ds being produced in the field is negligible. Therefore, eCry3.1Ab is unlikely to spread from corn cultivation and persist in the environment as the result of vertical gene flow.

An extensive review of infor mation relevant to the potential risks of horizontal gene transfer

for Bt crops to soil microbes was conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA

, 20 1 0 d ). Studies reviewed by the EPA showed no evidence of horizontal gene transfer under field conditions, and only equivocal evidence for horizontal gene transfer under laboratory conditions designed to maximize the recovery of transformants. Conner et al. (2003) also review ed the literature and found very few examples where horizontal gene transfer had been demonstrated convincingly, and these cases relied on artificially high sequence homology between the transgene and the potential recipient organism (e.g., de

Vries et al.

, 2001). The codons in the ecry3.1Ab gene are optim ized for expression in plants, and hence the gene is likely to have low sequence homology with genes of soil microbes. Therefore, horizontal gene transfer of ecry3.1Ab from 5307 corn to soil microbes is highly unlikely. The probability of spread of ecry3 .1Ab outside corn cultivation by horizontal gene transfer is negligible.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 154 of 211 

### IX

. Insect Resistance Management



### Following USDA APHIS deregulation of 5307 corn and EPA registration, 5307 corn will

not be commercialized as a stand

- alone product offering but wi ll be sold as part of corn hybrids with multiple pyramided traits that have been combined via conventional plant breeding . The initial product offerings planned in the U.S. are Bt11 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 and Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × TC1507 × 5307 × GA21 corn hybrids. These hybrids will combine two rootworm

- active proteins (eCry3.1Ab from 5307 corn and mCry3A from MIR604 corn) that each provide control of western, northern and Mexican corn rootworms. Additionally, the hybrids will combine ot her Bt

- derived proteins that will

deliver broad

- spectrum control of economically important lepidopteran pests. Finally, the hybrids will also contain traits that confer tolerance to glyphosate and glufosinate herbicide applications , as additional weed

- con trol options . Apart from 5307 corn, all the other corn

events in these breeding stacks have been deregulated by USDA.

An important aspect of combining eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A in a single product is that these proteins have been shown to not compete for th e same binding si te in western corn rootworm gut membranes (Walters et al., 2010). This means that they exert their toxicity to rootworms by different modes of action at the target site. This feature offers significant benefits from the perspective of in sect resistance management, because pests are far less likely to evolve resistance to two control mechanisms deployed concurrently than they are to any single control mechanism. Not only will the combination of eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A significantly reduce th e likelihood of resistance to either protein, but it can also be expected

to reduce the selection pressure on other Bt proteins currently available in commercial

rootworm

- control corn hybrids as well as other established control mechanisms, including

conve ntional insecticides and crop rotation. Some rootworm populations have evolved

resistance to insecticides or have overcome traditional crop rotation methods . Hybrids containing eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A will represent an important and effective new tool in th e corn grower’s arsenal of rootworm control mechanisms.

Current insect resistance management strategies for Bt corn products are centered around the planting of a structured refuge that can provide a source of susceptible adult insects with

which rare r esistant insects can mate. Matings of resistant and nonresistant insects serve to dilute the frequency and establishment of resistance genes in a population. The size and configuration of the structured refuge are determined by toxin dose and insect biol ogy. A second important aspect of combining eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A in a single product is that the

minimum size of the on

- farm refuge required to delay resistance can be reduced from 20% of a grower’s total corn acreage (e.g., for MIR604 corn or other corn products with single

rootworm

- control traits) to 5% of a grower’s acreage. This will (1) offer additional pest control benefits on what would previously have been refuge acres, (2) reduce the environmental impact of insecticide use on refuge acres, and (3 ) increase grower compliance with refuge requirements.

Syngenta is committed to implementing a product stewardship program that will help preserve the long

- term efficacy o f its corn hybrids. Syngenta has developed a5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 155 of 211 

### comprehensive insect resistance management plan , which will soon be submitted to the EPA for their review and approval. The key elements of this plan are the standard components of a robust insect resistance plan for Bt crop deployment, and include:

**•** A d escription of pest biology and ecology

**•** High

- dose or effective

- dose expression of insecticidal proteins

**•** An appropriate non

- Bt refuge

**•** A extensive product stewardship program that includes grower

education, programs to promote grower compliance, monitoring of
pest popula tions, and remedial action plans

These multiple components will operate synergistically to provide long

- term protection against the development of target pest resistance.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 156 of 211 

### X . Adverse Consequences of Introduction



### Syngenta is not aware of any unfavorab le information that would have bearing on this Petition for deregulation.

Syngenta ’s development and testing of 5307 corn has not revealed any data o r observations indicating that 5307 corn would pose a greater plant pest risk than conventional corn

. Further, based on its extensive research, Syngenta does not anticipate that deregulation of 5307 corn will have any adverse environmentalconsequences. Nonetheless, Syngenta intends to submit an Environmental Report that will be submitted as a supplemen t to this Petition. As noted above, this Environmental Report is specifically intended to provide information that will assist APHIS in fulfilling its obligations under NEPA, as well as other applicable statutes and regulations.

The Environmental Report will discuss a range of issues related to the deregulation of 5307 corn, including any potential direct, indirect or cumulative impact s on the quality of the human environment, endangered species, unique geographic areas, critical habitats, public

health a nd safety (including children and minorities), genetic diversity of corn , farmer or consumer choice, insect resistance

, or the economy, either within or outside the U.S. Moreover, because 5307 corn offers growers an additional choice for protection of cor n

crops from feeding damage caused by rootworm pests, it is expected to convey benefits

similar to those associated with previously deregulated Bt corn products that are commercially available

. T hese benefits include reduced insecticide use, improved pest control and worker safety, better yield, and fewer environmental impacts . Additional

benefits will include increased product choice for growers

, increased price competition

, and

extended useful life of Bt corn as well as other approaches for rootworm con trol. These beneficial impacts are also expected to be part of the Environmental Report.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 157 of 211 

### X I . References



### Note

Altschul, S.F., T. L. Madden, A.A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. Lipman (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI

- BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25 :3389

- 3402. : This list of references also includes those cited in Appendices B, C, and D.

Alvarez

- Alfageme, F., N. Ferry, P. Castanera, F. Orteg o, and A. M.R. Gatehouse (2008). Prey mediated effects of Bt maize on fitness and digestive physiology of the red spider mite predator Stethorus punctillum Weise (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Transgenic

Research 17 :943

- 954.

Anonymous (2009). The Pesticid e Manual (15 th



### AOSA (2005a). Rules for Testing Seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Stillwater,

Oklahoma. edition). The British Crop Protection Council, Hampshire, UK, ISBN 978 1 901396 18 8.

AOSA (2005b). Tetrazolium Testing Handbook . Contri bution No. 29 to the Handbook on Seed Testing. J. Peters (ed.) Association of Official Seed Analysts, Stillwater, Oklahoma. Accessed on October 24,

2006: http://www.aosaseed.com/TZwebsite/2005pdf/2005Summary.pdf

Armitage, P. and G. Berry (1987). Statistical Methods in Medical Research , 2 nd



### Arsuffi ed. Oxford:

Blackwell Scientific Publica tions. pp. 129

- 130.

, T.L. and K. Suberkropp (1989). Selective feeding by shredders on leaf

- colonizing stream fungi: comparison of macroinvertebrate taxa. Oecologia 79 : 30

- 37.

Arumuganathan, K. and E. D. Earle (1991). Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9 :208

– 218.

Babendreier, D., N. Kalberer, J. Romeis, P. Fluri, and F. Bigler (2004) . Pollen consumption in honey bee larvae: a step forward in the risk assessment of transgenic plants. Apidologie 35 :293

- 300.

Baltazar, B. M., J.J. Sánchez

- Gonzales, L. de la Cruz

- Larios, and J.B. Schoper (2005).

Pollination between maize and teosinte: an important determinant of gene flow in

Mexico. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110 :519

- 526.

Blackwell, B.F., D. A. Helon, and R.A. Dolbeer (2001). Repelling sandhill cranes from

corn: Whole

- kernel experiments with captive birds. Crop Protection 20 :65

- 68.

Bojsen, K., I. Donaldson, A. Haldrup, M. Joersbo, J. D. Kreiberg, J. Nielsen, and F.T. Okkels (1994). Mannose or xylose based posi tive selection. U.S. Patent No. 5,767,378.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 158 of 211 

### Branson, T.F. and G.R . Sutter (1989). Evaluating and breeding for maize resistance to the rootworm complex. In: Toward Insect Resistant Maize for the Third World: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Methodologies for Developing Host

Plant Resistance to Maize Insects

, pp 130

- 139. Mexico, DF : CIMMYT.

Brauer, A. W., C. Oman, and M.N. Margolis (1984). Use of o

- phthalaldehyde to reduce background during automated Edman degradation. Analytical Biochemistry 137 :134

- 142.

Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2006). Global impact of biotech crops: socio

- economic and

environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum 9 :139

- 151. Available at: http://www.agbioforum.org

.

Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2010). Global impact of biotech crops: Environmental effects,

1996

- 2008. AgBioForum 13 :76

- 94. Available at: http://www.agbioforum.org

.

Brunaud, V ., S. Balzergue , B. Dubreucq , S. Aubourg, F. Samson, S. Chauvin, N. Bechtold,

C. Cruaud, R. DeRose, G. Pelletier, L. Lepiniec, M. Caboche, and A. Lecharny (2002).

T

- DNA integration into the Arabidopsis genome depends on sequences of pre

insertion sites. EMBO Rep orts 3 :1152

- 7.

Burns, R.G. (1 982). Enzyme activity in soil: location an d a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14 :423

- 427.

Byrne, P. F. and S. Fromherz (2003). Can GM and non

- GM crops coexist? Setting a precedent in Boulder Country, Colorado, USA. Food, Agriculture and Environment 1 : 258

- 261.

Chandler, L.D. (2003) Corn rootworm areawide management program: United States Department of Agriculture

– Agricultural Research Service. Pest Management

Science 59: 605

- 608. http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10 .1002/ps.683/abstract

.

Chen, E. and C. Stacy (2003). Modified Cry3A toxins and nucleic acid sequences coding therefor. Syngenta Participations AG, applicant. Publication No. WO/2003/018810. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization

.

Chilton, M. and O. Que (2003). Targeted integration of T

- DNA into the tobacco genome at

double

- stranded breaks: New insights on the mechanism of T

- DNA integration. Plant Physiology 133 :956

- 65.

Chomczynski, P. (1992). One

- hour downward alkaline capill ary transfer for blottin g of

DNA and RNA. Analytical Biochemistry 201: 134

- 139.

Christensen, A. H., R.A. Sharrock, and P.H. Quail (1992). Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter

activi ty following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Molecular Biology

18 : 675

- 689.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 159 of 211 

### Codex (2009). Codex Alimentarius Commision. Guideline for the conduct of food safety

assessment of foods derived from recombinant

- DNA plants. Second edition . pp. 7

- 23 Joint World Health Organization/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

Nations Food Standard Programme: Rome, Italy. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/a1554e/a1554e00.p df

Coll, M. and M. Guershon (2002). Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annual Review of Entomology 47 :267

- 297.

Conner, A. J., T.R. Glare, and J.

- P. Nap (2003). The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. The Plant

Journal 33 : 19

- 46.

Crickmore, N., D.R. Zeigler, E. Schnepf, J. Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, A. Bravo, and D.H. Dean (2010). Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature. http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/

Crocker, D., A. Hart, J. Gurney, and C. McCoy (2002). Project PN0908: Methods for estimating daily food intake of wild birds and mammals. Central Science Laboratory. Report to the (UK) Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/W eb_Assets/PSD/Research_PN0908.pdf

de Framond, A.J., K.A. Barton, and M.

- D. Chilton (1983). Mini

- Ti: A new vector strategy for plant genetic engineering. Nature Biotechnology 1 :262

- 269.

d e Vries, J., P. Meier, and W. Wackernagel (2001). The natural transformation of the soil

bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Acinetobacter sp. by transgenic plant DNA strictly depends on homologous sequences in the recipient cells. FEMS Microbiology Letter s 195 : 211

- 215.

Depicker, A., S. Stachel, P. Dhaese, P. Zambryski, and H.M. Goodman (1982). Nopaline synthase: transcript mapping and DNA sequence. Journal of Molecular and Applied

Genetics 1 : 561

- 573.

Devos, Y., D. Reheul, and A. De Schrijver (2005). The co

- existence between transgenic and

non

- transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross

fertilization. Environmental Biosafety Resear ch 4 : 71

- 87.

Dube, S. and E. Flynn (1988). Estimating protein molecular weights using SDS

- PAGE.

Focus 20 : 24

- 25.

Dubelman, S., B. R. Ayden, B.M. Bader, C.R. Brown, C. Jiang, and D. Vlachos (2005). Cry1Ab protein does not persist in soil after 3 years of sustained Bt corn use. Environmental Entomology 34 : 915

- 921.

Dutton, A., H. Klein, J. Romeis, and F. Bigler (2002). Uptake of Bt

- toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea

. Ecological Entomology 27 : 441

- 447.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 160 of 211 

### Ellis, B.A., J. N. Mills, G.E. Glass, K.T. McKee, D.A. Enria, and J.E. Childs (1998). Dietary habits of the common rodents in an agroecosystem in Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 79 : 1203

- 1220.

EPA (2007). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Phosphomannose isomerase in all plants; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. 40 CFR § 174.527.

EPA (2010a). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Bacillus thuringiensis eCry3.1Ab protein in corn; temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. 40 CFR §

174.532.

EPA (2010b). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticides Registration Action

Document

- Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 Protein and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production (Vector PV

- ZMIR13L) in MON 863 Corn (OECD Unique Identifier: MON

- ØØ863

- 5) and Bacill us thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 Protein and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production (Vector PV

- ZMIR39) in MON 88017 Corn (OECD Unique Identifier: MON

- 88Ø17

- 3). Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division. http://www.r egulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0607

- 0029.

Accessed March 26, 2011

.

EPA (2010c). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticides Registration Action

Document

- Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 Proteins and the Genetic Material Necessary for Their Production (Plasmid Insert PHP17662) in Event DAS

59122

- 7 Corn (OECD Unique Identifier: DAS

- 59122

- 7). Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetai l;D=EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0607

- 0026.

Accessed March 26, 2011

.

EPA (2010d). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticides Registration Action

Document

– Cry1Ab and Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Corn Plant

- Incorporated

Protectants. Office of Pesticid e Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention

Division. http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/cry1f

- cry1ab

- brad.pdf

. Accessed November 6, 2010.

EPA (2010e). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticides Registration Action

Document

- Modified Cry3A Protein and the Genetic Material Necessary for its Production (via Elements of pZM26) in Event MIR604 Corn SYN

- IR604

- 8. Office of

Pesticide Pr ograms, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention

Division. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0607

- 0027

. Accessed March 29

. 2011.

EPA (201 0f). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Issuance of an Experimental Use

Permit. Federal Register 75 :57778

- 57779. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010

- 23720.htm

EPA (2011a). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

. Pesticide Experimental Use Permit;

r eceipt of e xtension a pplication; c omment r equest

. Federal Register. 76 : 3135

-5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 161 of 211 

### 3136

. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pk g/FR

- 2011

- 01

- 19/html/2011

- 1021.htm

. (Note: As of April 21, 2011, the notice of amendment/extension of the Experimental Use Permit had not yet been published in the Federal Register . The Federal Register notice described here announced EPA’s receipt of Syngenta’s application to amend/extend the Experimental Use Permit.)

EPA (2011b). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

. Bacillus thuringiensis eCry3.1Ab protein in corn; temporary exemption from the requ irement of a tolerance. 40 CFR §

174.532. Federal Register 76 : 14289

- 14290

. http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi

bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=uRGKUr/0/1/0&WAISaction=retrieve

Ewing, B. and P. Green (1998). Base

- calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred II. Error probabilities. Genome Research 8 : 186

- 194.

FAO/WHO (2001). Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Cons ultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Rome, Italy. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/en/ec_jan2001.pdf

FARRP (2010). FARRP Protein AllergenOnline Database, version 10.0, updated January 2010. Lincoln, NB: Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska at Lincoln. http://www.allergenonline.com. Accessed January 28, 2010.

FDA (1992). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. Federal Register 57 (104): 22984

- 23001.

Fling, M. E., J. Kopf, and C. Richards (1985). Nucleotide sequence of the transposon Tn7 gene encoding an aminoglycoside

- modifying enzyme, 3''(9)

- O

- nucleotidyltransferase.

Nucleic Acids Research 13 : 7095

- 7106.

Galinat, W. C . (1988). The origin of corn. Pp. 1

- 31. In : Corn and Corn Improvement,

Third Edition. G. F. Sprague and J. W. Dudley (eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America : Madison, Wisconsin.

Geis er, M., S. Schweizer, and C. Grimm (1986). The hypervariable region in the genes coding for entomopathogenic crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis : nucleotide sequence of the kurhd1 gene of subsp. kurstaki HD

- 1. Gene 48 : 109

- 118.

Gill, J.F., V. Deretic, and A.M. Chakrabarty (1986). Overproduction and assay of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phosphomannose isomerase. Journal of Bacteriology 167 : 611

- 615.

Gracy, R.W. and E.A. Noltmann (1968). Studies on phosphomannose isomerase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 243 : 3161

- 3168.

Grimm, C., B. Reber, M. Barth, M.P. Candolfi, A. Drexler, C. Maus, L. Moreth, A. Ufer, and A. Walterdorfer (2000). A test for evaluating the chronic effects of plant5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 162 of 211 

### protection products on the rove beetle Aleochara b ilineata Gyll. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) under laboratory and extended laboratory conditions. Pp 1

- 10. In

Guidelines to Evaluate Side

- effects of Plant Protection to Non

- target Arthropods . M. P. Candolfi, S. Blümel, R. Forster, F. M. Bakker, C. Grimm, S. A. Hassan, U. Heimbach, M. A. Mead

- Briggs, B. Reber, R. Schmuck, and H. Vogt (eds.). International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Paleartic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS). ISBN 92

- 9067

- 129

- 7.

IOBC: Gent, Belgium.

Grimsley, N., T. Hohn, J.W. Davies, and B. Hohn (1987). Agrobacterium

- mediated delivery of infectious maize streak virus into maize plants. Nature 325 : 177

- 179.

Hansen, G., A. Das, and M.

- D. Chilton (1994). Constitutive expression of the virulence genes improves the efficiency of plant transformation by Agrobacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91 : 7603

- 7607.

Harwood, J.D., W.G. Wallin, and J.J. Obrycki (2005). Uptake of Bt endotoxins by nontarget

herbivores a nd higher order arthropod predators: molecular evidence from a transgenic
corn agroecosystem. Molecular Ecology 14 : 2815

- 2823.

Head, G., C. . Brown, M.E. Groth, and J.J. Duan (2001). Cry1Ab protein levels in phytophagous insects feeding on transgenic cor n: implications for secondary exposure

risk assessment. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99 : 37

- 45.

Head, G., J.B. Surber, J.A. Watson, J.W. Martin, and J.J. Duan (2002). No detection of Cry1Ac protein in soil after multiple years of Bt cotton (Bollgard) use. Environmental Entomology 31 : 30

- 36.

Heeb, S., Y. Itoh, T. Nishijyo, U. Schnider, C. Keel, J. Wade, U. Walsh, F. O’Gara, and D. Haas (2000). Small, stable shuttle vectors based on the minimal pVS1 replicon for use

in Gram

- negative, plant

- associated bacteria. Molecular Plant

- Microbe Interactions

13 : 232

- 237.

Hileman, R. E., A. Silvanovich, R.E. Goodman, E.A. Rice, G. Holleschak, J.D. Astwood, and S. L. Hefle (2002). Bioinformati c methods f or allergenicity assessment using a comprehe nsive allergen database. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

128 : 280

- 291.

Hilger, C., F. Grigioni, L. Thill, L. Mertens, and F. Hentges (2002). Severe IgE

- mediated anaphylaxis following consumption of fried frog legs : definition of **α**

- parva lbumin as the allergen in cause. Allergy 57 : 1053

- 1058.

Hill, H.D. and J.G. Straka (1988). Protein determination using bicinchoninic acid in the presence of sulfhydryl reagents. Analytical Biochemistry 170 : 203

- 208.

Höfte H. and H. Whiteley (1989). Ins ecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis

. Microbio log ical Reviews 53: 242

- 255.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 163 of 211 

### Hohn, T., L. Stavolone, P. De Haan, H. Ligon, M. Kononova. (2007). Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus promoters. U.S. Patent No.7,166,770. Washington DC: U.S. patent
Office.

Holtzer, T.O., J.M. Norman, T.M. Perring, J.S. Berry, and J.C. Heintz (1988). Effects of microenvironment on the dynamics of spider

- mite populations. Ex perimental and Applied Acarolo gy 4 : 247

- 264.

Homan, H.J., G.M. Linz, and W.J. Bleier (1 994). Effect of crop phenology and habitat on the diet of common grackles ( Quiscalus quiscula ). American Midland Naturalist 131 : 381

- 385.

Houtcooper, W.C. (1978). Food habits of rodents in a cultivated ecosystem. Journal of Mammalogy 59 : 427

- 430.

Howal d, R., C. Zwahlen, and W. Nentwig (2003). Evaluation of Bt oilseed rape on the non

target herbivore Athalia rosae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 106 : 87

- 93.

Hutchison, W.D., E.C. Burkness, P.D. Mitchell, R.D. Moon, T.W. Leslie, S.J. Fleischer, M. Abrahamson, K.L. Hamilton, K.L. Steffey, M.E. Gray, R.L. Hellmich, L.V. Kaster, T.E. Hunt, R.J. Wright, K. Pecinovsky, T.L. Rabaey, B.R. Flood, and E.S. Raun

. (2010). Areawide suppression of European corn borer with Bt maize reaps savings to

non

- Bt mai ze growers. Science 330 : 222

- 225. DOI: 10.1126/science.1190242.

ILSI (2008). International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database, v. 3.0. http://www.cropcomposition.org/cgi

- perl/search_ora.cgi; search parameters: crop type = “CORN_FIELD,” tissue type = “FORAGE” or “GRAIN,” crop year = “All”, country = “All,” and state = “All”; searching not restricted by analysis method or value range (accessed February 9, 2010).

Ingham, D.J., S. Beer, S. Money, and G. Hansen (2001). Quantitative real

- tim e PCR assay for determining transgene copy number in transformed plants. Biotechniques 31 : 13 2

- 140.

Ishida, Y.H. Saito, S. Ohta, Y. Hiei, T. Komari, and T. Kumashiro (1996). High efficiency transformation of maize ( Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

. Nature Biotechnology 14 : 745

- 750.

Itoh, T. and J. Tomizawa (1979). Initiation of replication of plasmid ColE1 DNA by RNA polymerase, ribonuclease H and DNA polymerase I. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 43 : 409

- 417

.

Itoh, Y., J. Watson, D. Haas, and T. Leisinger (1984). Genetic and molecular

characterization of the Pseudomonas plasmid pVS1. Plasmid 11 : 206

- 220.

Jensen, P.D., G.P. Dively, C.M. Swan, and W.O. Lamp (2010). Exposure and nontarget effects of transgenic Bt corn debris in streams. Environmental Entomology 39 : 707

- 714.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 164 of 211 

### Joersbo, M., I. Donaldson, J. Kreiber, S.J. Petersen, J. Brunstedt, and F.T. Okkels (1998). Analysis of mannose selection used for transformation of sugar beet. Molecular Breeding 4 : 111

- 117.

Komari, T., Y. Hiei, Y. Saito, N. Murai, and T. Kumashiro (1996). Vectors carrying two separate T

- DNAs for co

- transformation of higher plants me diated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. The Plant

Journal 10 : 165

- 174.

Koziel, M.G., N.M. Desai, K.S. Lewis, V.C. Kramer, G.W. Warren, S.V. Evola, L.D. Crossland, M.S. Wright, E.J. Merlin, K.L. Lau nis, S.J. Rothstein, C.G. Bowman, J.L. Dawson, E.M. Dunder, G.M. Pace, and J.L. Suttie (1997). Synthetic DNA sequence having enhanced insecticidal activity in maize. Syngenta, assignee. U. S. Patent No. 5,625,136. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent Office.

K rysan, J.L. (1986). Introduction: biology, distribution, and identification of pest

Diabrotica , pp. 1

- 24, In J.L. Krysan and T.A. Miller (eds.), Methods for the Study of

Pest Diabrotica

. Springer

- Verlag, New York.

Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of struc tural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T 4



### . Nature 227 : 680

- 685.

Li, Y. and J. Romeis (2010). Bt maize expressing Cry3Bb1 does not harm the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae , or its ladybird beetle predator, Stethorus punctillum

. Biological

Control 53 : 337

- 344.

Linz, G.M., G.A. Knutsen, H.J. Homan, and W.J. Bleier (2003). Baiting blackbirds (Icteridae) in stubble grain fields during spring migration in South Dakota. Crop

Protection 22 : 261

- 264.

Luna, S., J. Figuerroa, B. Balthaz ar, R. Gomez, R. Townsend, and J. B. Schoper (2001). Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Science 41 : 1551

- 1557.

Martinez, A., J.A. Traverso, B. Valot , M. Ferro, C. Espagne, G. Ephritikhine, M. Zivy , C. Giglione, and T. Meinnel (2008). Extent of N

- terminal modifications in cytosolic proteins from eukaryotes. Proteomics 8 : 2809

- 2831.

Marx, M

- C., E. Kandeler, M. Wood, N. Wermbter, and S. C. Jarvis (2005). Exploring the enzymatic landscape: distrib ution and kinetics of hydrolytic enzymes in soil particle

size fractions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37 : 35

- 48.

McNichol, D.K., R.J. Robertson, and P.J. Weatherhead (1979). Seasonal, habitat and sex

specific patterns of food utilization by red

- winged blackbirds ( Agelaius phoeniceous ) in eastern Ontario and their economic importance. University of Nebraska,

Lincoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmbirdcontrol/37/ . (Accessed August 20

, 2007).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 165 of 211 

### Mendelsohn, M., J. Kough, Z. Vaituzis, and K. Matthews (2003). Are Bt crops safe? Nature Biotechnology 21 : 1003

- 1009.

Metcalf, R.L. (1986). Foreword. In J.L. Krysan and T.A. Miller (eds.), Methods for the Study of Pest Diabrotica

. Springer

- Verlag : New York.

Meyers, B.C., S.V. Tingey, and M. Morgante (2001). Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome. Genome Research

11 : 1660

– 1676.

Miles, J.S. and J.R. Guest (1984). Nucleot ide sequence and transcriptional start point of the phosphomannose isomerase gene ( manA ) of Escherichia coli. Gene 32 : 41

- 48.

Murray, E.E., J. Lotzer, and M. Eberle (1989). Codon usage in plant genes. Nucleic Acids

Research 17 : 477

- 498.

National Research Council (1983). Diet formulation and processing. In Nutrient Requirements of Warmwater Fishes and Shellfishes. National Academy Press : Washington, D C

.

NCBI. 2009. Entrez® Protein database. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnolog y Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of

Health. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=Protein . Accessed May 21,

2009.

NCBI. (2010a). Entrez® Nucleotide D atabase, including GenBank®. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine,

National Institutes of Health. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ entrez?db=nucleotide

. A ccessed May 7, 2010.

NCBI (2010b). Entrez ® Protein Database, Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of

Health. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Protein . Accessed January 18, 2010; February 12, 2010; April 12, 2010.

Negrotto, D., M. Jolley, S. Beer, A.R. Wenck, and G. Hansen (2000) . The use of phosphomannose

- isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants ( Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation. Plant Cell Reports 19 : 798

- 803.

Obert, J. C., W.P. Ridley, R.W. Schneider, S.G. Riordan, M.A. Nemeth, W.A. Truj illo, M.L. Breeze, R. Sorbet, and J.D. Astwood. (2004). The composition of grain and forage from glyphosate tolerant wheat MON 71800 is equivalent to that of conventional wheat ( Triticum aestivum L .) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 1375

- 1384. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf035218u

.

Obrist, L.B., A. Dutton, R. Albajes, and F. Bigler (2006a). Exposure of arthropod predators to Cry1Ab toxin in Bt maize fields. Ec ological Entomology 31 : 143

- 154.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 166 of 211 

### Obrist, L.B., A. Dutton, J. Romeis, and F. Bigler (2006b). Biological activity of Cry1Ab toxin expressed by Bt maize following ingestion by herbivorous arthropods and exposure of the predator Chrysoperla carnea

. BioContro l 51 : 31

- 48.

Obrist, L.B., H. Klein, A. Dutton, and F. Bigler (2005). Effects of Bt maize on Frankliniella

tenuicornis and exposure of thrips predators to prey

- mediated Bt toxin. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115 : 409

- 416.

OECD (2002). Consens us document on the compositional considerations for new varieties of maize ( Zea mays ): Key food and feed nutrients, anti

- nutirents and secondary

metabolites. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, No. 6. OECD

Environment Directorate. Joint meet ing of the chemicals committee and the working party on chemicals, pesticides and biotechnology. Paris, 42

pp. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/

ef 5acb7d10c9cd66c1256c1b004323e8/$FILE/JT00130429.PDF (accessed January 28, 2010).

OECD (2003). Consensus document on the biology of Zea mays subsp. mays (maize).

Series on Harmo nization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 27 . OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Paris, 49 pp. http://www.oecd.org /officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2003 )11&doclanguage=en

Oleson, J. D., Y. Park, T.M. Nowatzki and J.J. Tollefson (2005). Node

- injury scale to evaluate root injury by corn rootworms. Journal of Economic Entomology 98 : 1

- 8.

Oom en, P. A., A. de Ruijter, and J. van der Steen (1992). Method for honeybee brood feeding tests with insect growth

- regulating insecticides. EPPO Bulletin 22 : 613

- 616.

Ooms, G., P.J.J. Hooykaas, R.J.M. Van Veen, P. Van Beelen, T.J.G. Regensburg

- Tu ї nk, and

R.A. Sc hilperoort (1982). Octopine Ti

- plasmid deletion mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with emphasis on the right side of the T

- region

.

Pearson, W. R. and D.J. Lipman (1988). Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85 : 2444

- 2448. Plasmid 7 : 15

- 29.

Pedersen, J.F., S.R. Bean, D.L. Funnell, and R.A. Graybosch (2004). Rapid iodine staining technique for identifying the waxy phenotype in sorghum grain and waxy genotype in sorghum pollen. Crop Scienc e 44 : 764

- 767.

Poggio, L., G. Gonzales, V. Confalonieri, C. Comas, and C. A. Naranjo (2005). The genome organization and diversification of maize and its allied species revisited:

evidences from classical and FISH

- GISH cytogenetic analy sis. Cytogenetic an d

Genome Research 109 : 259

- 267.

Ponting, C. (2001). Issues in predicting protein function from sequence. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2 : 19

- 29.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 167 of 211 

### Pusch, M., D. Fiebig, I. Brettar, H. Eisenmann, B.K. Ellis, L.A. Kaplan, M.A. Lock, M.W. Naegeli, and W. Traunsp urger (1998). The role of micro

- organisms in the ecological connectivity of running waters. Freshwater Biology 40 : 453

- 495.

Ragkou, V.S., C.G. Athanassiou, N.G. Kavallieratos, and Z. Tomanovic (2004). Daily consumption and predation rate of different Stethorus punctillum instars feeding on Tetranychus urticae

. Phytoparasitica 32 : 154

- 159.

Raps, A., J. Kehr, P. Gugerli, W. J. Moar, F. Bigler, and A. Hilbeck (2001). Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarg et herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) for the presence of Cry1Ab. Molecular Ecology 10 : 525

- 533.

Raybould, A., D. Stacey, D. Vlachos, G. Graser, X. Li, and R. Joseph (2007). Non

- target organism risk assessment of MIR604 maize expressing mCry3A for control of corn

rootworm. Journal of Applied Entomology 131 : 391

- 399.

Raybould, A. and D. Vlachos (2010). Non

- target organism effects tests on Vip3A and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of MIR162 maize. Transgenic Research. Published online in advance of print version. DOI

10.1007/s1124 8

- 010

- 9442

- 1.

Rosi

- Marshall, E.J., J.L. Tank, T.V. Royer, M.R. Whiles, M. Evans

- White, C. Chambers, N.A. Griffiths, J. Pokelsek, and M.L. Stephen (2007). Toxins in transgenic crop by

products may affect headwater stream ecosystems. Proceedings of the Na tional Academy of Science USA 104 : 16204

- 16208.

Sadeghi, M., M. Hajivandi, R. Bogoev, and J. Amshey (2003). Molecular weight estimation of proteins by gel electrophoresis revisited. Focus 25 : 35

- 39.

Saghai

- Maroof, M. A., K.M. Soliman, R.A. Jorgensen, and R.W. Allard (1984). Ribosomal DNA spacer

- length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science

USA 81 : 8014

– 8018.

San Miguel, P. and J.L. Bennetzen (1998). Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by the massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Annals of Botany 82 (Supplement A): 37

- 44.

Sekar, V., D.V. Thompson, M.J. Maroney, R.G. Bookland, and M.J. Adang (1987). Molecular cloning and characterization of the insecticidal crystal protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis

. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Science USA 8 4 : 7036

– 7040.

Severson, D.W. and J.E. Parry (1981). A chronology of pollen collection by honeybees. Journal of Apicultural Research 20 : 97

- 103.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 168 of 211 

### Stavolone, L., A. Ragozzino, and T. Hohn (2003a). Characterization of cestrum yellow leaf curling virus : a new member of the family Caulimoviridae

. Journal of General Virology 84 : 3459

– 3464.

Stavolone, L., M. Kononova, S. Pauli, A. Ragozzino, P. de Hann, S. Milligan, K. Lawton, and T. Hohn (2003 b). Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus (CmYLCV) promoter: a new

str ong constitutive promoter for heterologous gene expression in a wide variety of

crops. Plant Molecular Biology 53 : 703

- 713.

Steffey, K.L., M.E. Rice, J. All, D.A. Andow, M.E. Gray, and J.W. van Duyn (1999). In

Handbook of Corn Insects

. Entomological Society of America: Lanham, Maryland.

Sterner, R.T., B.E. Petersen, S.E. Gaddis, K.L. Tope, and D.J. Poss (2003). Impacts of small

mammals and birds on low

- tillage, dryland crops. Crop Protection 22 :595

- 602.

Strickberger, M. W. (1976). Probability and s tatistical testing. pp 140

- 163 In Genetics , 2 nd



### Taylor, S. L.and S.L. Hefle (2001). Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 107 : 765

- 771. ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Tijssen, P. (1985) . Processing of data and reporting of results of enzyme immunoassays. pp

385

- 421. In : Practice and Theory of Enzyme Immunoassays. Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Volume 15. Elsevier Science Publishers : Amsterdam.

Tinland , B. and B. Hohn (1995). Recombination between prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA: Integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens T

- DNA into the plant genome. Genetic Engineering 17 : 209

- 229.

Torres, J. B., J. R. Ruberson, and M. J. Adang (2006). Expression of Ba cillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protein in cotton plants, acquisition by pests and predators: A tritrophic analysis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 8 : 191

- 202.

US FWS. 2010. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of the Interior. Endangered Species Program Database. http://endangered.fws.gov/ Date accessed: October 7,

2010.

USDA

- AMS (2010). United States De partment of Agriculture. Agricultural Marketing Service. Plant Variety Protection Office. http://apps.ams.usda.gov/CMS/ . Accessed November 29, 2010.

USDA

- NASS (2010). United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Acreage Report. Released June 30,

2010. http://usda.mannlib.cornel l.edu/usda/current/Acre/Acre

- 06

- 30

- 2010.pdf

Walling, L. L. (2006). Recycling or regulation? The role of amino

- terminal modifying

enzymes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9 : 227

- 233.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 169 of 211 

### Walters, F.S., C.M. deFontes, H.Hart, G.W. Warren, and J.S. Chen (2010). Lepidopteran

active variable

- region sequence imparts coleopteran activity in eCry3.1Ab, an engineered Bacillus thuringiensis hybrid insecticidal protein. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76 : 3082

- 308 8.

Wang, K., L. Herrera

- Estrella, M. Van Montagu, and P. Zambryski (1984). Right 25 bp terminus sequence of the nopaline T

- DNA is essential for and determines direction of

DNA transfer from Agrobacterium to the p lant genome. Cell 38 : 455

- 462.

Ward, D., T. D eGooyer, T. Vaughn, G. Head, M. McKee, J. Astwood, and J. Pershing. (2005). Genetically enhanced maize as a potential management option for corn

rootworm: YieldGard ®



### Webster, J.R., E.F. Benfield, T.P. Ehrman, M.A. Schaeffer, J.L. Tank, J.J. Hutchens, and D.J. D’Angelo (1999). What happens to allochthonous material that fa lls into streams? A synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta. Freshwater Biology 41 : 687

- 705. rootworm maize case study. Pp 239

- 262. In Western Corn Rootworm: Ecology and Managem ent. S. Vidal, U. Kuhlmann, and C. Edwards (eds.). CAB International : Wallingford, Oxfordshire.

Xing, Y.

- J., Q. Ji, Q. Yang, Y.

- M. Luo, Q. Li, X. Wang. 2008. Studies on Agrobacterium

mediated genetic transformation of embryogenic suspensio n cultures of sweet potato. African Journal of Biotechnology 7 : 534

- 540.

Zambryski, P., A. Depicker, K. Kruger, and H.M. Goodman (1982). Tumor induction by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: Analysis of the boundaries of T

- DNA. Journal of Molecular and Applied Genetics 1 : 361

- 370.

Acknowledgements



### The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dennis Ward for his critical review s of and

e ditorial contributions to this P etition and Larry Zeph for his guidance in its preparation

.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 170 of 211 

### Appendix A. USDA Notifications for Field Trials with Event 5307 Corn



### Field trials with transformation Event 5307 corn have been conducted in the U.S. under

USDA

- APHIS release permits or notifications since 2005 . A listing of these notifications, along with a status of the field test report f or each, is provided in Table A

- 1.

Table A

- 1. List of USDA

- APHIS field release permits and notifications under which plantings of Event 5307 corn have occurred

.

APHIS
Reference
Number 1 Effective Dates (MM/DD/YY) Release States or Puerto Rico (PR) 2 Field Test Report Status 3

05

- 062

- 02n 4/25/05

- 4/25/06 HI

, IL

, MN

, NE

, WI Submitted

05

- 104

- 09n 5/12/05

- 5/12/06 HI Submitted

06

- 055

- 08n 4/27/06

- 4/27/07 HI

, IA

, IL

, MN

, MO

, NE Submitted

07

- 043

- 109n 4/5/07

- 4/5/08 HI

, IL

, IN

, IA

, KS

, MN

, MO

, NE

, SD

, WI Submitted

07

- 166

- 101n 7/16/07

- 7/16/08 IA Submitted

07

- 240

- 103n 11/21/07

- 11/21/08 HI

, PR Submitted

08

- 051

- 104n 3/20/08

- 3/20

- 09 HI

, IA

, IL

, IN

, MN

, MO

, PR

, SD

, WI Submitted

08

- 051

- 107n 3/20/08

- 3/20/09 NE Submitted

08

- 085

- 105n 4/25/08

- 4/25/09 WA Submitted

08

- 224

- 102n 9/22/08

- 9/22/09 HI Submitted

08

- 304

- 106n 11/30/08

- 11/30/09 HI

, PR Submitted

09

- 013

- 105n 3/1/09

- 3/1/10 HI

, PR Submitted

09

- 050

- 108n 3/20/09

- 3/20/10 CA

, CO

, NE Submitted

09

- 062

- 103n 4/1/09

- 4/1/10 AR

, IA

, IL

, MI

, MO

, NE

, OH

, OK

, SC

, WA Submitted

09

- 063

- 103n 4/1/09

- 4/1/10 HI

, IL

, KY

, IA

, IN

, MN

, MO

, NE

, SD

, WI Submitted

09

- 084

- 109n 4/14/09

- 4/14/10 IA Submitted

09

- 086

- 102n 4/13/09

- 4/13/10 NE Submitted

09

- 114

- 102n 5/13/09

- 5/13/10 IA

, NC

, WI Submitted

09

- 231

- 102n 9/25/09

- 9/25/10 HI, PR S ubmitted

10

- 056

- 103n 3/26/10

- 3/26/11 CO

, FL

, PR

, HI

, IA

, IL

, IN

, KY

, MN

, MO

, NE

, SD

, WI N ot submitted

10

- 064

- 109n 4/6/10

- 4/6/11 AR

, KY

, LA

, PR

, CO

, IA

, IN

, MN

, HI

, IL

, KS

, MO

, NE

, WI

, SD N ot submitted

10

- 235

- 105n 9/23/10

- 9/23/11 HI, PR N ot submitted

1 Only the permits and notifications under which plantings of 5307 corn actually occurred are listed

.

2 States listed are the actual release states if the Field Test Report has been submitted, or approved release

states if the Field Test Report has not yet been submitted

.

3 Field Test Reports shown as “Not Submitted” are due to APHIS by six months after expiration of the permit

o r notification (i.e., they are due to be submitted in 2011 or 2012).5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 171 of 211 

### Appendix B. Materials and Methods Used in the Genetic

Characterization of Event 5307 Corn



### This appendix provides details of the materials and methods used in the various studies performed to genetically characterize Event 5307 corn . The design, results and conclusions of these experiments are described in Part V of this Petition , titled Genetic

Characteriza tion of Event 5307 Corn

. All literature references cited in this a ppendix are

listed in Part IX of this Petition, titled References

.

B.1. Plant Material



### Event 5307 corn and nontransgenic control corn seeds were planted and grown in a Syngenta Biotechnolo gy, Inc. greenhouse in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA under standard greenhouse conditions and then processed to extract genomic DNA. The specific generations of 5307 plants used and the corresponding control plants used are specified in the descriptions of the studies described in Part V of this Petition. Appropriate quality control methods were used to verify the purity and identity of the plant material used in each study. The pedigree showing the gen otypes of Event 5307 seed for the vari ous studies is provided in Figure III

- 1. Table III

- 1 provides a list of the sources of plant material used for each study.

B.2. Real

- Time PCR Analysis



### All plants grown for genetic characterization studies were individually analyzed for the presence of ecry3.1Ab and pmi by real

- time PCR analysis (Ingham et al., 2001). A control assay targeting the endogenous corn alcohol dehydrogenase gene 1 ( adh1 ) was used to confirm the presence of DNA in each reaction. Leaf discs were sampled from each individual pl ant. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was isolated from leaf discs of each individual plant using a method adapted from the Wizard® Magnetic 96 DNA Plant System

for real

- time PCR analysis.

Table B

- 1 lists the primers and probes used to detect ecry3.1Ab, pmi a nd adh1. Figure B

- 1

shows the locations of the ecry3.1Ab

- specific and pmi

- specific primers and probes in the transferred DNA (T

- DNA) of plasmid pSYN12274, the transformation plasmid used to generate 5307 corn

.

The following cycling parameters were used for this reaction: 95°C for five minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for five seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds.

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 172 of 211 Table B

- 1. Real

- time PCR primers and probes used for the detection of ecry3.1Ab, pmi

, and adh1

Amplicon of interest Forward primer sequence (5 ʹ to 3ʹ) Reverse primer sequence (5 ʹ to 3ʹ) Probe sequence (5 ʹ to
3 ʹ)

ecry3.1Ab TACGAGAGCTGGGTG
AACTTCA CGATCAGGTCCAGCA
CGG CCGCTACCGCCGCG
AGATGA

pmi CCGGGTGAATCAGCG

TTT GCCGTGGCCTTTGAC
AGT TGCCGCCAACGAATC
ACCGG

adh1 GAACGGTGTTGGGTTT
GCAT TGCAGCCTAACCATG
CGCAGGGTA TCCAGCAATCCTTGC
ACCTT

Figure B

- 1. Locations of real

- time PCR primers and probes in the plasmid pSYN12274

T

- DNA

B.3. Genomic DNA Extraction



### Following verification of the plants’ identity by real

- time PCR analysis (see above ), leaf tissue for 10 plants of each genotype was pooled into a sampling bag and stored at

- 80°C ± 10°C. Genomic DNA used for nucleotide sequencing and Southern blot analyses was isolated from the pooled leaf tissue from 10 plants per genotype using a mod ification of the method described in Saghai

- Maroof et al . (1984). Pooled leaf tissue was ground into a fine powder using a pre

- chilled mortar and pestle, with liquid nitrogen, and then placed into a bottle for storage. For each DNA extraction, approximat ely 40 g of this tissue and 200 ml of prewarmed CTAB buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 2% CTAB [w/v], 0.2% [v/v] β

- mercaptoethanol) were combined in a bottle; the sample was then mixed gently and incubated for 90 minutes at 65°C ± 5°C. An equal volume of chloro

form: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was then added, followed by gentle mixing and centrifugation

for 10 minutes at 7277 × g at room temperature. The resulting aqueous phase was trans

ferred to a clean container, and 10 μg of ribon uclease per ml of aqueous phase was added. The sample was mixed and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C ± 2°C. An equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was then added, followed by gentle mixing and centrifu

gation for 10 minutes at 7277 × g at room temperature. The aqueous phase was collected in a clean bottle, and the DNA was precipitated with a 0.8 volume of isopropanol. The DNA was then pelleted by centrifugation at 291 × g and washed once with 70% ethanol. The DNA pellet was air dried and dissolved in 2.5 ml of prewarmed 0.1X T ris

- E DTA

.

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 173 of 211 B.4. DNA Quantitation



### The concentration of DNA was measured using a Quant

- iTTM PicoGreen® dsDNA kit. A

two

- point standard curve was generated using a Lambda DNA standard. Genomic DNA was quantified by interpolation from the two point standard curve using the TBS

- 380 Mini

Fluorometer.

B.5. Nucleotide Sequence of the T

- DNA Insert

(See Part V.A. of this Petition)



### Two overlapping fragments that span the 5307 corn insert were amplified from genomic

DNA us ing PCR analysis (Figure B

- 3). The 5307 plants used for this analysis were from the

NP2171 × BC5F 3 

### generation, as identified in the pedigree chart of plant materials (Figure

III

- 3). PCR amplification was carried out using the ExpandTM Long Template PCR Sy stem.
Table B

- 3 lists the primers used to amplify the insert fragments; Tables B

- 4 and B

- 5 contain the thermalcycling parameters.

Figure B

- 2. Map of the 5307 corn insert and location of PCR

- amplified fragments from

5307 corn to determine insert sequence

Table B

- 2. Primers used to amplify the insert of 5307 corn

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 174 of 211 Table B

- 3. Cycling parameters for PCR amplification of insert Fragment 1

Table B

- 4. Cycling parameters for PCR amplification of insert Fragment 2



### The PCR fragments were cloned into pCR® 4

- TOPO® vector , and three colonies for each PCR product were randomly selected and grown . T he plasmid DNA was then independently extracted , and t he resulting plasmid preparations , which contained the PCR amplification products

, were subsequently sequenced

.

Dye

- terminator sequencing, a modification of the dideoxynucleotide chain

- terminator sequencing method, was carried out using the ABI3730XL analyzer with ABI BigDye® 3.1 terminator chemistry. The sequence analysis was done using the Phred, Phrap, and Con sed package (from the University of Washington), and was carried out to an error rate of less than 1 in 10,000 bases (Ewing and Green

, 1998).

Three individual clones for each PCR product were sequenced individually, and a consensus sequence was generated for each clone. These sequences were aligned using AlignXTM, a component of Vector NTI AdvanceTM, version 10.3.0, to obtain the final consensus sequence for each segment of the insert sequence.

B.6. Southern Blot Analyses

(See Parts V.B., V.C. and V.D. of this Petition)



### Southern blot analyses were performed using standard molecular biology techniques (Chomczynski, 1992). Each lane contained 7.5 μg of genomic DNA that was digested with the appropriate restriction enzyme(s) for 8 to 16 hours.

A positive control, representing one copy of a fragment of known size in the corn genome, was included on each Southern blot. The positive control for these Southern blot analyses was digested DNA from plasmid pSYN12274. This positive control was loaded i n a well

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 175 of 211 

### together with 7.5 μg of digested DNA from NP2171 × NP2460 plants, so that the migration of this positive control DNA reflected, more accurately, the migration of the restriction fragment in the corn genome. The amount of positive control (picogra ms for one copy) was calculated by the following formula with a corn genome size of 2.67 × 10 9 

### bp (Arumuganathan and Earle, 1991).

The molecular weight marker (serving as the reference substance), the digested genomic DNA, and the positive control wer e loaded onto 1% SeaKem® Gold agarose gels, and the DNA fragments were then separated by electrophoresis in 1X T ris

- acetate

- E DTA buffer.

Following a 10 minute depurination in 0.25 N HCl, the DNA in the gel was denatured in 0.5

M NaOH and 1.5 M NaCl for 30 minutes. The DNA was then transferred to a Zeta

- Probe GT membrane, by downward alkaline transfer, for 90 minutes using a Bio

- Rad Applige ne Vacuum Blotter. After rinsing the membrane briefly in 2X SSC, the DNA was cross

- linked to the membrane using ultraviolet light.

All PCR

- generated probes and the molecular weight marker

- specific probe were labeled with phosphorus

- 32

- deoxycytidine tr ip hosphate ([α

- 32 

### P]

- dCTP) by random priming using the MegaprimeTM DNA labeling system. Unincorporated label ([α

- 32 

### P]

- dCTP) was removed using the Micro Bio

- Spin® Chromatography Columns.

Membranes were incubated in 30 ml of PerfectHybTM Plus Hybridization Buf fer (which contained 100 μg/ml denatured Calf Thymus DNA) for at least 30 minutes at 65°C ± 5°C. Both the molecular weight marker

- specific probe and either the full length T

- DNAspecific probe or backbone

- specific probe were added to the hybridization solu tion, and the membranes were incubated for 16 hours at 65°C ± 5°C. Incubation was followed by a

combination of washes at 65°C ± 5°C in 2X SSC with 0.1% SDS and washes at 65°C ± 5°C in 0.1X SSC with 0.1% SDS. Finally, the membranes were subjected to imagi ng using a Molecular Dynamics Storm 860® phosphorimager.

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 176 of 211 B.7. Nucleotide Sequencing of T

- DNA Flanking Regions in Corn Genome

(See Part V.F. of this Petition)



### The 5 ʹ and 3 ʹ corn genomic sequences flanking the 5307 corn insert were previously recovered. This preliminary sequence was used to design primers for amplification of the flanking regions from 5307 corn . The flanking regions were amplified from genomic DNA

extracted from 5307 corn using the ExpandTM High

- Fidelit y PCR System. Table B

- 5 lists the primers used to amplify the flanking regions; Table B

- 6 contains the thermal cycling
parameters.

Table B

- 5. Primers used to amplify the flanking regions of 5307 DNA insert

Table B

- 6. PCR c ycling parameters for the flanking regions of 5307 DNA insert



### The PCR fragments were cloned into pCR®4

- TOPO® vector, and three colonies for each PCR product were randomly selected and grown. The plasmid DNA was then independently extracted, and the resulting plasmid preparations, which contained the PCR amplification products, were subsequently sequenced as described above ( see Nucleotide Sequence of the T

- DNA Insert).

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 177 of 211 B.8. Flanking Sequence Analysis to Determine if T

- DNA Inserted into a Known Corn

Gene

(See Part V.F. of this Petition)



### The following parameters were used for the BLASTN analysis against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Nucleotide Database (NCBI, 2010a) to identify corn genomic sequences having identity or high similarity to sequences flanking the 5 ′ and 3′

ends of the 5307 T

- DNA insert:

**•** 

### Expect = 10. The expectation value ( E

- value) is a measure of the probability that matches between sequences occurred by chance. Search results involving comparisons

between nucleotides with highly similar sequences yield E

- values approaching zero; the probability that sequence similarities occurred by chance increases with higher E

- values (Ponting, 2001). The search identified all sequences in the database with search results yielding an E

- v alue of 10 or lower; this is the conservative default search setting for this
parameter.

**•** 

### The scoring scheme used was the default for nucleotides: +1 for a match and

- 3 for a

mismatch.

**•** 

### The following gap penalties were used for this scoring matrix: Existence = 5 and Extension = 2. A gap is a space introduced into an alignment to compensate for insertions and/or deletions in one sequence relative to another. The introduction of a gap causes the deduction of a fixed value from the alignment score to prevent the accumulation of excessive gaps in an alignment. Extension of the gap to encompass additional nucleotides is also penalized in determining the score of an alignment. The

resultant score is derived from the number of identical matches between t he query sequence and the database entry, with higher scores indicating more identity between the
two sequences.

**•** 

### A low complexity filter was used for this search.

B.9. Amino Acid Sequence Comparison of Query Peptide to Known or Putative Toxins

(See Part V .G. of this Petition)



### The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for Proteins (BLASTP) program, version 2.2.19, (Altschul et al ., 1997) was used to compare the query peptide representing the translated sequence of the putative 243

- bp ORF to all entries in the NCBI Entrez® Protein Database (containing over 10 million amino acid sequences) (NCBI, 2010b). Information associated with the sequences having the highest similarity to the query sequence was examined to determine if any of the sequences was a toxin or p utative toxin.

The BLASTP algorithm is optimized to identify regions of local similarity between protein sequences. This approach detects more similarities than would a search that aligns two sequences over their entire length. The following default pa rameters were used in the BLASTP comparisons:

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 178 of 211 

### • Expectation value ( E

- value) = 10.

**•** Word size = 3

**•** Gap costs: existence = 11 and extension = 1

**•** Similarity matrix: Blocks Substitution Matrix62 (BLOSUM62)

**•** No complexity filter

The E

- value is a measure of the probability that matches between sequences occurred by chance. Search results involving comparisons between proteins with highly similar sequences yield E

- values approaching zero; the probability that sequence similarities

occur red by chance increases with higher E

- values (Ponting, 2001). The search identified all sequences in the database with search results yielding an E

- value of 10 or lower. These sequences were evaluated for source and biological function. Any sequences de scribed as toxins or putative toxins were identified.

B.10. Amino Acid Sequence Comparison of Query Peptide to Known or Putative Allergens

(See Part V.G. of this Petition)



### The 81

- amino

- acid query peptide sequence representing the translated sequence of the putative 243

- bp ORF was screened for biologically relevant amino acid sequence similarity to any of the known or putative protein allergens within the FARRP AllergenOnline database (FARRP, 2010). The FARRP AllergenOnline database is a curated, peer

- re viewed database containing proteins identified as food allergens, respiratory allergens, allergenic venom proteins, contact allergens, gliadins, and glutenins. Entries were compiled primarily from searches of publicly available protein databases using the NCBI Entrez® search and retrieval system, most recently searched in 2009 (NCBI, 2009). The NCBI dataset was screened by searches for entries associated with allergy or celiac disease; duplicate entries were removed, and additional entries were identified from publications. The list of candidate entries was then reviewed by an international panel of allergy experts who reviewed published clinical and laboratory evidence to support the candidate sequences as allergens. Proteins are classified as known or putative allergens according to predetermined criteria set by the FARRP expert review panel. The latest version of the FARRP AllergenOnline database (2010) contains 1,471 nonredundant entries. Similarity searches were performed using an exact copy of the entire list of sequences in the current version of the FARRP AllergenOnline database (2010) (maintained at Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA). Two different sequence searches were performed to
compare t he translated junction s equence with sequences in the FARRP AllergenOnline database. In the first search, the FASTA search algorithm, version 3.45 (Pearson and Lipman, 1988), was used to assess overall sequence similarity by comparing sequential 80

- amino

- acid peptides of the que ry sequence with the sequences in the FARRP AllergenOnline database. Each successive “window” of 80 amino acids was offset from the previous window by one residue, such that each peptide overlapped the previous peptide by

79 amino acids. The default FAST A settings used include an extension penalty of two and

### Appendix B

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 179 of 211 

### gap creation penalty of 12. The scoring matrix for FASTA was the Blocks Substitution Matrix50 (BLOSUM50), the same scoring matrix used by the authors of the FARRP AllergenOnline database. The BLOSUM 50 matrix is weighted to favor identical amino acids likely to impact protein structure. In the second search, the query sequence was screened for matches of eight or more contiguous amino acids (Hileman et al

. , 2002) using a program developed by Syngenta; this program compared every possible peptide of eight contiguous amino acids of the translated putative ORF with the sequences in the FARRP AllergenOnline database.

The FASTA search produces alignments between the 80

- amino

- acid peptides of the query sequence and the sequences in the allergen database. The evaluation of each query peptide sequence alignment utilizes the minimum criterion of 80 amino acids of alignment length with greater than 35% shared amino acid identity. Any alignments exceeding this criterion for shared sequence similarity indicate the potential for immunologically relevant sequence similarity (Codex

, 200 9 ). Additionally, any match of eight (or more) identical contiguous

amino acids between any query sequence and any sequence in the allergen database indicates the potential for immunologically relevant sequence similarit y (Codex , 200 9 ).

### Appendix C

. Materials, Methods and Results of C haracterization Studies

on t he eCry3.1Ab and PMI Proteins



### This appendix presents materials, methods and detailed results of analyses of the biochemical properties and biological activity of the eCry3.1Ab and PMI proteins in 5307 corn and in the corresponding eCry3.1Ab and PMI test substances used in safety studies. A summary of the results and conclusions of these analyses is provided in Part VI of this Petition, titled Characterization of the eCry3.1Ab and PMI Proteins

. All literature references cited in this appendix a re listed in Part IX of this Petition, titled References

.

C.1. Materials and Methods for Comparison of eCry3.1Ab Produced in 5307 Corn Plant s and Recombinant E

. coli



### Three preparations containing eCry3.1Ab were evaluated in this study: (1) LP5307,

extra cted from leaf material of 5307 corn plants ; ( 2 ) IAP5307, immunopurified eCry3.1Ab

derived from lea f material of 5307 corn plants ; and (3 ) microbial test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, prepared from a recombinant E

. coli overexpression system

. The sample designated LP5307 was used for Western blot analysis and insecticidal activity assays. The sample designated IAP5307 was used as the source of purified plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab for Western blot, glycosylation, N

- terminal sequencing and peptide mass mapping analysis. Nontransgenic, near

- isogenic plants were used as negative control plant material, the source of the LP

- NEG material.

Event 5307 Corn Leaf Tissue and Negative Control Corn Leaf Tissue


### Young leaves from greenhouse

- grown 5307 plants an d nontransgenic, near

- isogenic plants

were collected 4

- 6 weeks after emergence, frozen at

– 80°C ± 10°C, and ground into a fine powder using a Grindomix Knife Mill (Retsch).

Extracts of 5307 Corn and Control Corn Leaf Tissue for Western Blot Analysis



### Leaf powder was resuspended in extraction buffer containin g 100 mM sodium borate ( pH 10.0), 0.2% p olyvinylpyrrolidone ( PVP ) , 7.69 mM sodium azide, 0.5% Tween 20 , and supplemented with one Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet/50 ml of buffer (Roche). The mixture was homogenized with an Omni

- P rep H omogenizer (Omni International), incubated for 30 minutes on ice and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C (Sorvall Legend RT). The resulting supernatants were stored overnight at 2°C to 8°C and then stored

at

- 20°C ± 8°C in 4X NuPage LDS Sample Bu ffer (Invitrogen ) containing NuPage Sample Reducing Agent (Invitrogen ) for subsequent Western blot analysis. The sample extracts from the 5307 and control corn leaves were designated LP5307 and LP

- NEG, resp ectively.

Extracts of 5307 Corn and Control Corn Leaf Tissue for Insect Bioassay s 

### Extracts for bioassays were prepared by resuspending leaf powder from 5307 and control plants as described above, in a 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate

, pH 10.0 buffer. The

extrac tion mixtures were homogenized in a Waring blender for 45 seconds, incubated on ice for 1.5 hours and centrifuged (Sorvall RC5B) at 8,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was filtered through cheesecloth, centrifuged for an additional 30 minutes at 8,000 rpm at 4°C, and filtered through cheesecloth again. The resulting clear

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 181 of 211 

### supernatant was concentrated using centrifugal filter devices (Millipore). The sample was then stored overnight at 2

- 8°C for subsequent insect diet incorporation and ELISA analysis. The sample extract s from the 5307 and control corn leaves were designated LP5307 and LP

NEG, respectively.

Extracts of Control Leaf Ti ssue Fortified with Test Substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 for Western Blot Analysis



### T o determine whether the plant matrix affect s eCry3.1Ab mobility or immunoreactivity,

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was added to control leaf extract. This sample allow ed fo r comparison of the microbially produced eCry3.1Ab and plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab in the same matrix. For Western blot analysis, ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was added to LP

- NEG, as prepared for above Western blot analysis, such that the total protein and amount of eCry3.1Ab loaded on the gel was equivalent to that estimated for sample LP5307, as prepared for Western b lot analysis. This sample was designated LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.

Extracts of Control Leaf Tissue Fortified with Microbially Produced Test Substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 for Insect Bioassays



### To determine if the plant matrix affects bioactivity, ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was added to control

leaf extract. This sample allow ed for comparison of the microbially produced eCry3.1Ab and plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab in the same matrix. For the bioassays, ECRY3.1AB

- 0208

was added to LP

- NEG, as prepared for bioassays, such that when incorporated into the diet

the concentra tion of eCry3.1Ab in the diet was equivalent to the eCry3.1Ab concentration in the diet containing only the ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 test substance. This sample was designated

LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208.

Immunoaffinity

- Purified Plant

- Produced Protein


### Leaf powder from 5307 corn, prepared as described above, was resuspended in extraction buffer (pH 7.5) containing 100 mM sodiu m borate , 0.2% PVP, 7.69 mM sodium azide, 1.2% concentrated hydrochloric acid, 0.5% Tween 20, supplemented with one Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet/50 ml of buffer (Roche ) . The mixture was homogenized with an

Omni

- P rep H omogenizer and incubated for up to 2 hours on ice. The mixture was then centrifuged at approximately 2700 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C (Sorvall Legend RT). The
supernatant was filtered through cheesecloth and centrifuged at approximately 3100 rpm for

15 minutes at 4°C (Sorvall Legend RT). After a second centrifugation step (10,000 rpm for 12 minutes (Sorvall RC5B) the clarified supe rnatant was then loaded onto an equilibrated immunoaffinity column with mouse anti

- mCry3A antibodies bound to the matrix. To remove any proteins not bound to the antibodies, the column was washed with a 50 mM sodium bicarbonate buffer pH 8.0 containing 15 0 mM sodium chloride. After an additional wash step with a 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.8, eCry3.1Ab was eluted in 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 2.5), neutralized, and fractions were analyzed for eCry3.1Ab protein by

ELISA. Fractions containing eCry3.1 Ab protein were pooled, concentrated by ultrafiltration, and stored at 2°C to 8°C until further use. The resulting sample, designated IAP5307, was used as the source of purified plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab for Western blot, glycosylation, N

- terminal sequenci ng and peptide mass mapping analysis.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 182 of 211 Microbially Produced Test Substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208



### Test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was prepared from an E. coli overexpression system. The eCry3.1Ab protein in test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 is identical to that expressed in 5307

corn except that it contains one additional methionine and six histidine residues at the N

terminus. The intended additional seven amino acids aid in purification from the E. coli overexpression system. The ecry3.1Ab gene used for micro bial expression was linked to the

bacterial tac promoter in a vector derived from pET24a (Novagen) and transformed into E.

coli strain DH5α (New England Biolabs ). ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was prepared from pooled

batches of E. coli cell paste

. E. coli cells were ruptured and the cell debris removed by centrifugation. The soluble material was filtered, applied to an immobilized metal affinity column (GE Healthcare Nickel Sepharose Fast Flow column), and eluted using an imidazole step gradient. Fractions containin g the eCry3.1Ab protein were then further purified via anion exchange chromatography and eCry3.1Ab was eluted with a sodium chloride gradient. The eluted eCry3.1Ab

- containing fractions were pooled, concentrated and the buffer was exchanged. The solution was lyophilized and designated ECRY3.1AB

- 0208. The test

substance was stored at

- 20°C ± 8°C until further use. ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was determined to contain 89.6% eCry3.1Ab by weight and the intact mass of the eCry3.1Ab protein, as measured by mass spectromet ry, was 74.8 kDa.

eCry3.1Ab Quantification


### The Beacon Analytical Systems (BAS) eCry3.1Ab ELISA kit was used as described in Appendix D., section D.4., to quantify eCry3.1Ab.

Total Protein Determination


### Total protein in samples, LP5307, LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, and LP

- NEG as prepared for Western blot analysis, was quantified via the bicinchoninic acid metho d (Hill and Straka, 1988), using bovine serum albumin as the reference protein standard. The results were analyzed with BioMetallics DeltaSoft PC Micro plate Analysis Software, v. 1.71.2 using a

four

- parameter fit of the standard curve.

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination


### Western blot analysis was used to investigate the integrity of eCry3.1Ab in ECRY3.1AB

0208, LP5307, LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 and IAP5307. Aliquots containing 10 ng of eCry3.1Ab prepared in NuPag e LDS Sample Buffer (Invitrogen ) were subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS

- PAGE) with a NuPAGE 4

- 12% Bis

- Tris polyacrylamide gradient ge l (Invitrogen ) using 3

- (N

- morpholino)propane

- sulfonic acid ( MOPS ) running buffer (Bio

- Rad). An aliquot of the control plant sample LP

- NEG, equivalent in total protein to the amount lo aded on the gel for LP5307 (29.6 μg total protein), was included in the analysis as a negativ e control. The molecular

- weight standard was SeeBlue Plus2 pre

- stained stan dard (Invitrogen ). After electroblotting, the membrane was probed with polyclonal goat antibodies capable of detecting eCry3.1Ab protein.

Alkaline phosphatase

- conjugated donkey a nti

- goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted to 1:3,000 in Tris

- buffered saline with Tween 20 (Sigma

- Aldrich ) and 5% normal donkey serum was used to bind to the primary antibody and was visualized by development with 5

- bromo

- 4

- chloro

- 3

- indolyl phosphate/n itro blue tetrazolium ( BCIP/NBT ) alkaline

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 183 of 211 

### phosphatase substrate soluti on (Sigma

- Aldrich ). The Western blot was examined for the presence of intact immunoreactive eCry3.1Ab or immunoreactive eCry3.1Ab fragments.

Insecticidal Activity



### The insecticidal activ ity of eCry3.1Ab was assessed in feeding assays with freshly hatched

first

- instar Colorado potato beetles (L. decemlineata) in three independent bioassays

. The insect diet was prepared by blending a boiling mixture of 2.6 grams of agar and 169 ml of

Milli

- Q water with 28.1 grams of Colorado potato beetle diet powder mix and 1 gram of potassium hydroxide as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio

- Serv). The diet mixture was cooled to approximately 55°C in a water bath. Antibacterial and antifungal agents were each added to the cooled diet.

Bioassay treatments consis ted of (1) test subs tance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, (2) eCry3.1Ab

extracted from 5307 corn leaves ; LP5307, (3) control leaf extract fortified with test
substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 ; LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208

, and (4) control corn leaf tissue extract; LP

- NEG. A a stock solution o f ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 was prepared in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 10.0) to a concentration of 5 mg eCry3.1Ab/ml. Fr om th is , a 50 μg eCry3.1Ab/ml solution was prepared and serially diluted 1:1 (v/v) in 10 mM

ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 10.0) to produce eight solutions with concentrations ranging from 50 to 0.390 μg eCry3.1Ab/ml. The dilution series was t hen mixed 1:1 (v/v)

with the freshly prepared Colorado potato beetl e diet to produce eight diets with eCry3.1Ab

concentrations ranging from 25 to 0.195 μg/ml diet. Additional treatments containing eCry3.1Ab extracted from 5307 corn leaves, LP5307 (treatment 2), control leaf extract

fortified with the microbially

- produced test substance

, LP

- NEG + ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 (treatment 3) and control leaf tissue extract LP

- NEG (treatment 4) as prepared for bioassays were also serially diluted 1:1 (v/v) in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 10.0) and subsequently mixed 1:1 (v/v) with freshly prepared Colorado potato beetle diet. Each of these treatments was analyzed as a series of eight dilutions. Water and buffer controls were prepared in the same manner for each bioassay. The water control was prepared by mixing 1:1 (v/v) of purified water with freshly prepared Colorado potato beetle diet. The buffer control was prepared by mixing 1:1 (v/v) of 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 10.0) with freshly prepared Colorado potato beetle diet.

The bioassays were conducted in 24

- wel l culture plates. Each well contained one freshly

hatched L. decemlineata insect larva and 100 μl of insect diet. Larvae were transferred to each well manually using a small paint brush. The wells were covered with silicone stoppers and stored at ambien t laboratory conditions. Mortality readings were taken periodically starting at 72 hours and continued until at least 144 hours.

Glycosylation Analysis



### To determ ine whether eCry3.1Ab in ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 and eCry3.1Ab immuno

- affinity purified fro m 5307 corn leaf extract (IAP5307) were glycosylated, aliquots equivalent to 1 and 2 μg of eCry3.1Ab were analyzed with the DIG Glycan Detection Kit (Roche), in

accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The positive control was transferrin (a glycosylated protein) at 100, 50, 25 and 10 ng, and the negative control was creatinase (a nonglycosylated protein) at 2 μg. Samples were separated by SDS

- PAGE with a

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 184 of 211 

### NuPAGE4

- 12% Bis

- Tris polyacrylamide gradient gel and NuPAGE MES SDS running

buffer and electroblotted to nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen). While on the membrane, glycan moieties were oxidized with periodate, labeled with digoxigenin (DIG), and detected

with an alkaline

- phosphatase

- linked anti

- DIG antibody.

Peptide Mass Mapping Analysis


### eCry3.1Ab puri fied from an extract of 5307 corn leaves (IAP5307) and from ECRY3.1AB

0208 were analyzed by peptide mass mapping. Aliquots containing 2.5 to 5 μ g of eCry3.1Ab purified from 5307 corn leaf extract (IAP5307) and from test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 were subje cted to SDS

- PAGE using a NuPAGE 4

- 12% Bis

- Tris polyacrylamide gradient gel and NuPAGE MES SDS running buffer. The gel was stained with Coomassie G250 (Invitrogen), the protein band corresponding to the molecular weight of eCry3.1Ab was excised from the gel, and the protein was reduced, alkylated with iodoacetamide, and independently digested with trypsin and chymotrypsin. The mass analysis of the eCry3.1Ab

- produced peptides was performed using a quadrupole time

- of

flight mass spectrometer (Waters/Microm ass Q

- TOF Premier) connected to a Waters CapLC capillary liquid chromatography instrument. The detected peptide masses were searched using Mascot Software (Matrix Science) against a protein database containing the eCry3.1Ab protein sequence. The Mascot s earch parameters included likely N

- terminal modifications, which have previously been reported to occur in plants. Specifically, the

modifications investigated included α

- N

- acetylation, protein N

- formylation and protein N

methylation.

N

- Terminal Amino Aci d Sequence Analysis



### To determine the N

- terminal amino acid sequence of eCry3. 1Ab from test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 and eCry3.1Ab purified from 5307 corn leaf extract (IAP5307) were both subjected to SDS

- PAGE followed by electroblotting to a PVDF membrane. The blot was stained with amido black, and the band corresponding to eCry3.1Ab was excised and subjected to N

- terminal amino acid sequence analysis using automated Edman

- based chemistry (Brauer et al.

, 1984).

Statistical Methods



### The LC 50 

### values determine d in the insecticidal activity assay were calculated using the U.S. EPA Probit Analysis Program, version 1.5.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 185 of 211 C.2. R esults of Comparison of eCry3.1Ab Produced in 5307 Corn Plant s and

Recombinant E. coli

Immuno reactivity and Molecular Weight


### Western blot analysis of eCry3.1Ab in test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, LP

- NEG +

E CRY3.1AB

- 0208, LP5307, and IAP5307 revealed immunoreactive bands consistent with the predicted molecular weight 9 

### o f 74.8 kDa for samples containing eCry3.1Ab from

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 ( Figure C

- 1, L anes 2, 3 and 6) an d 73. 7 kDa for samples containing plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab ( L anes 4 and 5).

Figure C

- 1. Western blot analysis of eCry3.1Ab in test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, LP

- NEG +
ECRY3.1AB

- 0208, LP5307, IAP5307 and the negative control LP

- NEG.

Lane 1: Molecular

- weight markers

Lane 2: Microbially produced test substance E CRY3.1AB

- 0208 (10 ng eCry3.1Ab)

Lane 3: Control corn leaf extract, LP

- NEG (29.6 μg total protein) with the addition of test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 (10 ng eCry 3.1Ab )

Lane 4: 5307 corn leaf extract, LP5307 (10 ng eCry3.1Ab / 29.6 μg total protein )

Lane 5: Immunopurified eCry3.1Ab protein from 5307 corn leaf extract, IAP5307 (10 ng eCry3.1Ab)

Lane 6: T est substance E CRY3.1AB

- 0208 (10 ng eCry3.1Ab)

Lane 7: Contro l corn leaf extract, LP

- NEG (29.6 μg total protein)

Lane 8: Molecular

- weight markers

9 Although the eCry3.1Ab protein band showed slightly higher mobility (and therefore an apparent lower molecular weight) in comparison to the molecular weight standards on the Western blot ( Figure C

- 1 ), the difference between the expected and observed molecular weights on the gels can be explained by the limitations of SDS

- PAGE for accurate determination of molecular weight. Dube and Flynn (1988) have reviewed the reliability of SDS

- PAGE for molecular weight determinations and concluded that the apparent molecular weight of a protein by this method is typically within 10% of its true molecular weight.
This depends greatly on the similarity between the properties of the protein of interest and the prote ins in the standard set (Sadeghi et al

. , 2003). Additionally, the intact mass of eCry3.1Ab in ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 waspreviously me asured as 74.8 kDa

.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 186 of 211 

### The slight difference in molecular weight between the microbial and plant sources of eCry3.1Ab was consistent with the presence of the seven additional N

- terminal amino acids in the microbially produced protein. As expected, no immunoreactive bands were observed

in the plant

- produced control substance

, LP

- NEG (Figure C

- 1, Lane 7).

Insecticidal Activit y 

### The results of the insect bioassays were presented in Table VI

- 1 and discussed in Part

VI.A.1.b. of this Petition: Equivalence of eCry3.1Ab Test Substance and eCry3.1Ab in

5307 Plants

.

Glycosylation Analysis


### The positive control protein

, transferrin, a t 10 ng generated a clearly visible band (Figure C

2, L ane 4). Transferrin has a molecular weight of approximately 80 ,000 Da and contains approximately 5% glycan moieties by weight. This corresponds to approximately 25 glucose equivalents per molecule (b ased on a calculated molecular weight of 162 Da for the glycan moiety). Of the 10 ng of transferrin loaded on the gel, 0.5 ng could be attributed to glycan moieties and was clearly detectable. The highest concentration of eCry3.1Ab from both plant and microbial sources (IAP5307 and ECRY3.1AB

- 0208) loaded on the blot was 2 μg (2,000 ng). If 0.5 ng of glycan were detected in eCry3.1Ab, this would correspond to 0.025% by weight (0.5/2,000 ng), or 0.115 glucose equivalents per molecule. In other words, i f eCry3 .1Ab bands were stained as strongly as 10 ng of transferrin in L ane 4, this would indicate glycosylation of about 1 in 8.7 of the eCry3.1Ab molecules. No bands corresponding to glycosylated eCry3.1Ab were visible for the sample prepared from the

mi crobially

- produced ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 test substance ( Figure C

- 2, L anes 9 and 10) or immunopurified plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab

, IAP5307 ( L anes 7 and 8). Therefore, the

results indicate that neither the microbially

- produced nor the plant produced eCry3.1Ab
prote in was glycosylated.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 187 of 211 Figure C

- 2. Glycosylation analysis of eCry3.1Ab i n IAP5307 (immunopurified p lant

- produced protein ) and ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 ( microbially produced test substance ).

Lane 1: Transferrin (positive control), 100 ng
Lane 2: Tr ansferrin (positive control), 5 0 ng
Lane 3: Tr ansferrin (positive control), 25 ng
Lane 4: Transferrin (positive control), 10 ng Lane 5: Creatinase (negative control), 2 μg

. Lan e 6: Molecular

- weight markers.

Lane 7: Immunopurified eCry3.1Ab protein from Event 5307 corn leaf extract, IAP5307; 1 μg Lane 8: Immunopurified eCry3.1Ab protein from Event 5307 corn leaf extract, IAP5307; 2 μg
Lane 9: eCry3.1Ab from microbially produced test substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208; 1 μg

Lane 10: eCry3.1Ab from microbially produced test sub stance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208; 2 μg

.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 188 of 211 Peptide Mass Mapping


### Analysis of the plant

- produced eCry3.1Ab yielded coverage equivalent to 76% of the total predicted eCry3.1Ab amino acid sequence, as shown in Figure C

- 3. Analysis of the microbially produced eCry3.1Ab yielded coverage equivalent to 87% of the total predicted eCry3.1Ab amino acid sequence, as shown in Figure C

- 4. The identified peptides corresponded to regions throughout the sequence of eCry3.1Ab including the N

- termini of both proteins. The results of the peptide mass mapping analysis confirmed the identity of the purified proteins from both sources as eCry3.1Ab.

M **TSNGRQCAGIRPY** DGRQQHR **GLDSSTTKDVIQK** GISVVGDLLGVVGFPFGGALVSFYTNF

LNTIWPSEDPW **KAFMEQVEALMDQK** IADYAKNKALAELQGLQNNVEDYVSALSSWQK **NPAA**
**PFRNPHSQGRIRELFSQAESHFRNSMPSFAISGYEVLFLTTYAQAANTHLFLLKDAQIYGE**

**EWGYEKEDIAEFYKR** QLK **LTQEYTDHCVKWYNVGLDKLRGSSYESWVNFNR** YRR **EMTLTVL**

**DLIALFPLYDVRLYPKEVKTELTRDVLTDPIVGVNNLRGYGTTFSNIENYIRKPHLFDYLH**

**R** IQF **HTRFQPGYY** GNDSFNYWSGNY **VSTRPSIGSNDIITSPFYGNKSSEPVQNLEFNGEK** V

Y **RAVANTN LAVWPSAVYSGVTKVEFSQYNDQTDEASTQTYDSKR**  NVGAVSWDSIDQLPPET

TDEPLEK **GYSHQLNYVMCFLMQGSRGTIPVLTWTHKSVDFFNMIDSKKITQLPLTKSTNLG**

**SGTSVVKGPGFTGGDILR** R **TSPGQISTLRVNITAPLSQR** YRVRIR **YASTTNLQFHTSIDGR**
**PINQGNFSATMSSGSNLQSGSFR** TVGFTTPFNFSNGSSVF **TLSAHVFNSGNEVYIDR** IEF **V**

**PAEVTF** EAEY **DLERAQKAVN ELFTSSNQIGLKTDVTDYHID** 

Figure C

- 3. Predicted amino acid sequence of eCry3.1Ab and sequence identified by peptide mass mapping analysis of eCry3.1Ab from immuno purified p lant

- produced sample IAP5307. 

### QV

Identified eCry3.1Ab protein fragments are bold and un derlined.



### MHHHHHHMTSNGRQCAGIRPY DGRQQHR **GLDSSTTKDVIQK** GISVVGDLLGVVGFPFGGAL

VSFYTNFLNTIWPSEDPW **KAFMEQVEALMDQK** IADY **AKNKALAELQGLQNNVEDYVSALSS**
**WQKNPAAPFRNPHSQGRIRELFSQAESHFRNSMPSFAISGYEVLFLTTYAQAANTHLFLLK**
**DAQIYGEEWGYEKEDIAEFYKR** QLK **LTQEYTDHCVKWYNVGLDKLRGSSYESWVNFNR** YR R

**EMTLTVLDLIALFPLYDVRLYPKEVKTELTRDVLTDPIVGVNNLRGYGTTFSNIENYIRKP**
**HLFDYLHRIQF** HTRFQPGYYGNDSFNYWSGNY **VSTRPSIGSNDIITSPFYGNKSSEPVQNL**

**EFNGEK** VYR **AVANTNLAVWPSAVYSGVTKVEFSQYNDQTDEASTQTYDSKRNVGAVSWDSI**
**DQLPPETTDEPLEKGYSHQLNYVMCFLMQGSRGTIPVLTWTHKSVDFFNMIDSKKITQLPL**
**TKSTNLGSGTSVVKGPGFTGGDILRRTSPGQISTLRVNITAPLSQR** YRVRIR

Figure C

- 4. Predicted amino acid sequence of eCry3.1Ab and sequence identified by peptide mass mapping analysis of eCry3.1Ab from microbially produced test substance

ECRY3.1AB

- 0208. 

### YASTTNLQF
**HTSIDGRPINQGNFSATMSSGSNLQSGSFRTVGFTTPFNFSNGSSVFTLSAHVFNSGNEVY**

**IDRIEFVPAEVTFEAEYDLER AQKAVNELFTSSNQIGLKTDVTDYHIDQV** 

Identified eCry3.1Ab protein fragments are bold and underlined.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 189 of 211 

### T he peptide mass analysis provided two additional results regarding the structure of the proteins. Firstly, the intact N

- terminus of the plant

- produced protein could be identified. The analysis showed that the N

- terminal methionine was removed leaving the penultimate amino acid, threonine, at the N

- terminus of the eCry3.1Ab protein. This is a common process for many proteins occurring during translation (Walling, 2006). Secondly, the

nature of the N

- terminal block found for the pl ant produced protein, as described under N

Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

, below

, was identified. The analysis of the N

terminal peptide of the plant

- produced protein suggested the addition of an acetyl

- residue at the primary amino group of the N

- t erminal threonine

. This is a common modification known for plant

- expressed proteins (Martinez et al., 2008).

N

- Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis



### The N

- terminal sequence results confirmed that eCr y3.1Ab in the microbially produced test

substance ECRY3.1AB

- 0208 had the predicted N

- terminal amino acid sequence:

Predicted s equence: MHHHHHHMTS

eCry3.1Ab in ECRY3.1AB

- 0208: MHHHHHHMTS

N

- terminal sequencing analy sis of eCry3.1Ab immunoaffinity

- purified from 5307 corn leaves (IAP5307) revealed that the m ajority of the protein was naturally blocked at the N

termin us . However, the N

- terminal peptide was identified by peptide mass mapping ( see Peptide Mass Mapping

, above) and confirmed the expected sequence for the eCry3.1Ab protein

, starting at threonine a s described above. The analysis of the N

- terminal peptide of the plant

- produced protein suggested the addition of an acetyl

- residue at the primary amino group of the N

- terminal threonine

.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 190 of 211 C.3

. Materials and Methods for Comparison of PMI Produced in 5307 Corn Plant s and

Recombinant E

. coli



### The purpose of these analyses was to compare PMI from 5307 corn plants with PMI from

test substance PMI

- 0105, which was produced by overexpressing the gene pmi in

recombinant E. coli . The PMI proteins from both sou rces were compared biochemically and functionally to justify use of PMI in PMI

- 0105 as a surrogate for PMI in 5307 corn plants, for safety testing purposes. Both sources of PMI were predicted to have the identical amino acid sequence, because the gene pmi in both the plant and E. coli transformation vectors encoded the same PMI enzyme.

The conclusions of these analyses are described in Part VI.B.1.b of this Petition

, Equivalence of PMI in Test Substance and in 5307 Plants

.

Event 5307 Corn Leaf Tissue and Negative Control Corn Leaf Tissue


### Young leaves from greenhouse

- grown 5307 plants and nontransgenic, near

- isogenic plants

were collected 4

- 6 weeks after emergence, frozen at

– 80°C ± 10°C, and ground into a fine powder using a Grindomix Knife Mill (Retsch). The leaf powder was then lyophilized and

stored at

- 80 ± 10°C.

Extracts of 5307 and Control Corn Leaf Tissue


### Approximately 100 mg of lyophilized leaf powder was suspended in 3 ml extraction buffer (pH 7.0) containing 50 mM Tris, 2 mM DTT), 1 mM AEBSF, and 1 μM leupeptin. The mixture was then homogenized using an Omni

- Prep Homogenizer (Omni International) and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 10,000 rpm at approximately 4°C. The supernatant was desalted using PD

- 10 columns (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and eluted in extraction buffer. The resulting supernatant was then concentrated using the Millipore Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter devices (Millipore) and Tween 20 was added to achieve a final concentration of 0.1%. The samples derived f rom the 5307 and control corn tissues were designated LP5307 and LP

- NEG, respectively. They were stored at 2

- 8°C overnight prior to ELISA and enzymatic activity assays.

Extract of Control Leaf Tissue Fortified with Test Substance PMI

- 0105



### PMI from test s ubstance PMI

- 0105 was added to the extraction buffer with an aliquot of control leaf tissue to determine if the plant matrix or extraction procedure has an effect on PMI. For this sample preparation, 600 ng PMI from test substance PMI

- 0105 was added to

3 ml of extraction buffer containing 100 mg of control leaf tissue prior to homogenization. The sample was then homogenized, centrifuged, desalted and concentrated as described above (see Extracts of 5307 and Control Corn Leaf Tissue) . This sample was desi gnated

LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105.

PMI Protein Quantification


### The concentration of PMI in the plant extract samples (LP5307), negative control samples (LP

- NEG), and the negative control sample fortified with test substance PMI

- 0105 (LP

NEG + PMI

- 0105) was determine d by ELISA (Tijssen 1985). Polyclonal rabbit antibody generated against PMI protein was diluted to 2 μg/ml in a buffer containing 35 mM sodium bicarbonate and 15 mM sodium carbonate (pH 9.5) and used to coat a Nunc MaxiSorp 96

-

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 191 of 211 

### well plate (ThermoFisher Sci entific) at a volume of 100 μl/well. The plates were incubated overnight at 5°C ± 3°C. The plate contents were then emptied and tapped on paper towels to

remove residual solution. The p lates were blocked with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH

7.4 conta ining 1% nonfat milk for at least 30 minutes at room temperature. The plates were

washed five times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and incubated for 2 hours at 20°C

± 2°C with diluted plant extract samples and PMI

- 0105 standards at a volume of 100 μl/well

. Dilutions were made in ELISA dilution buffer (PBS plus 1% nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20). The plant extract samples and standards were assayed in triplicate. After washing, the plates were incubated with 100 μl/well monoclonal mouse antibody ( 1 μg/ml) generated against PMI protein diluted in ELISA dilution buffer for 1 hour at 20°C ± 2°C. The p lates were washed and subsequently incubated with 100 μl/well rabbit anti

- mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma

- Aldrich ) diluted 1:20, 000 in ELISA dilution

buffer for 1 hour at 20°C ±2°C. The plates were washed again and incubated in 0.1 mg/ml

TMB substrate solution (Sigma

- Aldrich ) in citrate buffer (24 mM citric acid monohydrate,

60 mM dibasic sodium phosphate

, 

### pH 5.0 containing 0.006% hydrogen peroxide) at a

volume of 100 μl/well. Color was allowed to develop for 30 minutes in the dark at room
temperature. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μl 3 M sulfuric acid per well,

and absorbance at 450 nm was measured with a Tecan Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan US). The results were analyzed with BioMetallics DeltaSoft PC Microplate Analysis Software, v. 1.71.2 using a four

- parameter algorithm.

Total Protein Determination


### Total protein of the plant extract samples (LP5307, LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105 and LP

- NEG) were quantified via the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Hill and Straka

, 1988), using

bovine serum albumin as the reference protein standard. The results were analyzed with

BioMetallics DeltaSoft PC Microplate Analysis Software, v. 1.71.2 using a 4

- parameter fit

of the standard curve.

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination


### Western blot analysis was used to investigate the integrity of PMI in the plant extract sample LP5307, the control leaf extract fortified with the mi crobially produced test substance ( LP

NEG + PMI

- 0105 ) and the microbially produced test substance PMI

- 0105. Aliquots equivalent to 5 ng PMI from sample LP5307, LPNEG + PMI

- 0105 and test substance PMI

0105 diluted in 10X Sample Buffer (as described by Laem mli (1970) containing 8% glycerol, 1% BME, 2% SDS, 65 mM Tris, and 0.01% bromophenol blue) were subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS

- PAGE) with a NuPAGE 4

- 12% Bis

- Tris ge l (Invitrogen ) and NuPAGE MES SDS running buffer (Invitrogen). An aliquot of the negative control sample (LP

- NEG); equivalent to 92.8 μg total protein ( the total amount of protein loaded on the gel for LP5307 ) , was included in the analysis as a negative control. Additionally, based on total protein, LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105 w as supplemented with

additional LP

- NEG extract to equal 86.8 μg total protein. The molecular

- weight standard was SeeBlue Plus2 pre

- stained standard (Invitrogen). After electroblotting, the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane was probed with immunoa ffinity

- purified polyclonal goat antibody ge nerated against PMI diluted to 1 μg/ml in Tris

- b uffered saline, pH 8.0 with 3% nonfat milk

. Alkalinephosphatase

- conjugated donkey anti

- goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:3000 in Tris

- buffered Saline wit h Tween 20, pH 8.0 )

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 192 of 211 

### was used to bind to the primary antibody and was visualized by development with BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase substrate solution (Sigma

- Aldrich ). The Western blot was examined for the presence of intact immunoreactive PMI or immunoreactive PMI fragments.

Enzymatic Activity


### The enzymatic activity of PMI was measured in triplicate using a continuous coupled spectrophotometric assay based on the method described by Gracy and Noltmann (1968)

and Gill et al. (1986). PMI activity w as measured by linking the formation of fructose 6

- phosphate (resulting from the isomerization of mannose 6

- phosphate) to the reduction of

NADP via phosphoglucose isomerase and glucose 6

- phosphate dehydrogenase (as shown in

the diagram below). The molar r eduction of NADP in this system can be directly converted

into the molar isomerization of mannose 6

- phosphate via PMI. The enzymatic reactions

were conducted in 96

- well plates. Microbially

- produced and plant produced PMI were

diluted in 50 mM Tris buffer , pH 7.0 containing 0.1% Tween 20. The reaction was initiated by adding 5 ng PMI from triplicate plant extract samples LP5307, LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105, or

PMI from test substance PMI

- 0105 to an assay mixture containing 10 mM mannose 6

- phosphate (Sigma

- Aldrich ), 1 mM β

- nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP)

sodium sal t hydrate (Sigma

- Aldrich ), 2 U/ml phosphoglucose isomerase (Sigma

- Aldrich ) and 2 U/ml glucose 6

- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) (Sigma

- Aldrich ) in 50 mM Tris

buffer

, pH 7.0. The total vol ume of the reaction mixture was 200 μl.

The assay mixture was preincubated at 25°C ± 2°C for 10 minutes prior to the addition of PMI. Following the 10 minute preincubation, PMI was added to the assay mixture and the plate was read by a SpectraMax Plus384 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices) to determine the pathlength of the sample in each well. The reduction of NADP was monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm at 25oC ± 2oC over 10 minutes with readings taken every 15 seconds. The change in a bsorbance over time was monitored using SoftMax Pro version 5.2. The extinction coefficient of NADPH, 6.22 cm

- 1 

### mM

- 1 

### , was used for calculating the amount of NADPH formed. One unit (U) of PMI activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to catalyz e the conversion of 1 μmol of mannose 6

- phosphate to

fructose 6

- phosphate per min (equivalent to 1 μmol NADP reduced per min) under the described reaction conditions. Results are reported as the mean and standard deviation of triplicate enzymatic assays.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 193 of 211 C.4. Results of Comparison of PMI Produced in 5307 Corn and Recombinant E. coli

Immunoreactivity and Molecular Weight Determination


### Western blot analysis of PMI in the plant extract sample LP5307, the control leaf extract

fortified with PMI test substance PMI

- 0105 (LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105), and test substance PMI

0105 reveals a dominant immunoreactive band consistent with the predicted molecular weight of PMI ( Figure C

- 5, L anes 2, 3, and 4). The intensity of the PMI bands in the presence of the p lant matrix (L anes 2 and 3) is diminished compared to the intensity of the

PMI band in the absence of the matrix ( L ane 4). However, there is similar intensity between

the PMI bands from test substance PMI

- 0105 in the prese nce of plant matrix (Figure C

- 5, Lane 3) and PMI from 5307 corn extract (Lane 2). Thus, the relative diminished intensity of the PMI bands in the presence of the plant matrix is most likely due to matrix effects. The matrix effect can be attributed to the nature of the sample. Crude pl ant extract preparations contain all soluble cell proteins of varying molecular weights that may interfere with the mobility of the analyzed protein and with antibody binding. The co

- migration of the matrix with PMI or PMI fragments may limit access of the antibody to epitopes of the target protein and therefore diminish the signal.

The Western blot analysis also revealed some faint bands combined with a diffuse background signal in molecular weight range above 62 kDa in both LP5307 and LP

- NEG +

PMI

- 0105 (Figure C

- 5, Lanes 2 and 3). As this effect (with exactly the same band pattern) was also detected in the negative plant extract sample LP

- NEG (Lane 5) it is not related to PMI prote in and most likely represents an unspecific response on the Western blot. As expected, no immunoreactive band corresponding to the molecular weight of PMI was observed in the negative plant extract sample LP

- NEG (Lane 5). The Western blot analysis

also r evealed a very faint protein band with a molecular weight of approximately 30 kDa in the microbially

- produced test substance PMI

- 0105. Because this protein cross

- reacted with

the anti

- PMI antibody it is most likely a PMI degradation product. The degradat ion product is not visible in the sample with the control leaf extract fortified with the microbially

produced test substance (LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105) due to the matrix effect described above.

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 194 of 211 Figure C

- 5

. Western blot analysis for PMI in LP5307, LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105, test

substance PMI

- 0105, and LP

- NEG.

Lane 1: Molecular weight standard SeeBlue Plus2
Lane 2: Plant extract sample LP5307 (Invitrogen)

Lane 3: Plant extract sample LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105 Lane 4: Microbially

- p roduced test substance PMI

- 0105
Lane 5 : Plant extract sample LP

- NEG
Lane 6: Molecular weight standard SeeBlue Plus2

### Appendix C

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 195 of 211 

### The average PMI enzymatic activity was 455.67 U/mg PMI in the triplicate plant extract samples LP5307 and 526.26 U/mg PMI in the microbially

- produced test substance PMI

0105 ( Table C

- 1). The control leaf extract fortified with the microbially

- produced test

substance (LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105) had a specific activity of 518.81 U/mg PMI (Table C

- 1 )

, demonstrating that the plant matrix had little effect on the enzymatic activity of PMI

. As expected, no PMI activity was detected in the negative control plant extract sample

, LP

NEG ( Table C

- 1)

.

Table C

- 1. Enzymatic activity of PMI in 5307 corn leaf extract, control corn leaf extract

fortified with test substance PMI

- 0105, test substanc e PMI

- 0105, and control corn leaf

extract.

LP5307 is leaf extract of 5307 corn plants. LP

- NEG + PMI

- 0105 is control corn leaf extract fortified with microbially produced PMI test substance PMI

- 0105. LP

- NEG is control corn leaf extract.

1 One unit of PMI activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to catalyze the conversion of 1 μmol of mannose 6

- phosphate to fructose 6

- phosphate per min (equivalent to 1 μmol NADP reduced per min) under the desc ribed reaction
conditions

.

2 Assay

LP5307

- 1,

- 2, and

- 3 represent three independent extractions. Replicate PMI Activity 1 (U/mg PMI) Average PMI Activity of

Assay Replicates (U/mg PMI) SD of Assay Replicate s (U/mg PMI) CV of Assay Replicates (%) Overall Average PMI Activity (U/mg PMI) Overall SD (U/mg PMI) Overall CV (%)

1 469.58

2 490.03

3 479.21

1 478.77

2 474.93

3 439.47

1 418.44

2 448.30

3 402.34

1 514.24

2 534.33

3 507.86

1 519.00

2 531.87

3 527.90

1 below LOD

2 below LOD

3 below LOD LP5307

- 1 2

LP5307

- 2

LP5307

- 3

LPNEG + PMI

- 0105 423.03

518.81

PMI

- 0105

LPNEG 526.26

below LOD 10.23

21.67

23.32

13.82

6.59

not applicable 479.60

464.39 6.7%

1.3%

not applicable 455.67 30.37

2.1%

4.7%

5.5%

2.7%5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 196 of 211 

### Appendix D

. Quantification of eCry3.1Ab and PMI in 5307 Corn



### This appendix provides details of the materials and methods used to determine the concentrations of eCry3.1Ab and PMI in the tissues of 5307 plants at various growth stages.

Refer to Part VI.C. of this P etition, eCry3.1Ab and PMI Concentrations in 5307 Co rn, for a description of the study and results. All literature references cited in this appendix are listed

in Part IX of this Petition, titled References

.

D.1. Plant Tissue Pro duction



### Plants were grown for the collection of tissues in Bloomington, IL; Sadorus, IL; Shirley, IL; and Stanton, MN in two plots per location; one for the 5307 hybrid and one for the control hybrid.

D.2. Plant Tissue Processing



### In the presence of dry ice, the leaf, root, kernel and whole

- plant samples were individually

proces sed to a fine powder. A subsample from each homogeneous, powdered sample was lyophilized and stored at

– 80 oC ± 10oC. The percent dry weight of each sample was determined from the sample weight before and after lyophilization. Frozen pollen samples

were analyzed without further processing.

D.3. Tissue Extraction and Analysis



### Protein extractions were performed on representative aliquots of the lyophilized leaf, root,

kernel

, and whole

- plant samples, and fresh frozen pollen samples. The e xtracts were analyzed by ELISA (Tijssen

, 1985) t o quantify the amount of eCry3.1Ab and PMI in each sample. Sample extracts were analyzed in triplicate, and standard curves were generated with known amounts of the corresponding reference protein. Standard curves were generated for each ELISA plate. Nontransgenic plant tissue extracts were analyzed in parallel to evaluate any impact of the plant matrix on the ELISA.

D.4. eCry3.1Ab Quantification

– Extraction and ELISA Procedures

Buffers



### The buffers used for extraction and ELISA analysis of eCry3.1Ab are listed in the following

table:

### Appendix D

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 197 of 211 Name of buffer Constituents

Phosphate

- buffered saline (PBS) 140 mM sodium chloride, 8.24 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 1.81mM sodium phosphate monobasic, pH 6.75

Borate buffer (pollen) 0.1 M Sodium tetraborate decahydrate, 0.2% PVP

- 360, 7.69 mM sodium azide, 1.2% Concentrated hydrochloric acid, 0.5% Tween 20; pH approximately 7.5. Compl ete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science) added on day of extraction

Borate buffer (leaves, roots,

whole plants, kernels) 0.1 M Sodium tetraborate decahydrate, 0.2% PVP

- 360, 7.69 mM sodium azide, 0.5% Tween 20; titrated to pH 10.0. Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science) added on day of extraction

Dilution buffer PBS, 0.05% Tween 20, 1% BSA, 0.02% sodium azide

Wash buffer 10 mM Tris, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.02% sodium azide

eCry3.1Ab Extraction



### Leaves, Roots, Whole Plants, and Kernels. A ratio of 3 ml of borate buffer pH 10.0 was added to 100 mg of lyophilized tissue. The samples were vortexed, placed on wet ice for at least 30 minutes, homogenized using an Omni

- Prep Homogenizer, and centrifuged at 2°C to

8°C to form a pellet. The supernatants were removed and stored at 2°C to 8°C until analysis.

Pollen. For each sample, 25 mg of fresh frozen pollen was weighed into a 2

- ml Eppendorf tube containing three 4

- mm glass beads and stored at

- 80°C ± 10 ° C for at lea st two hours. Each tube was then placed into a Four Station Titer Plate/Micro Tube Grinding Mill and set at ~3000 strokes per minute for approximately 45 seconds. The tubes were then placed on wet ice and 1.5 ml of borate buffer, pH 7.5 was added to each sample. The samples were mixed and set on wet ice for at least 30 minutes then centrifuged at 2°C to 8°C to form a pellet. The supernatants were removed and stored at 2°C to 8°C until analysis.

eCry3.1Ab Quanti t ation



### The eCry3.1Ab ELISA kit was manufac tured at Beacon Analytical Systems (BAS), Portland, ME. The assay is a double

- antibody sandwich assay in which the eCry3.1Ab protein is affixed to the wells of a microtiter plate using a monoclonal, anti

- mCry3A antibody that binds to the mCry3A domains of the eCry3.1Ab protein. The primary antibody was diluted and added to each well of a 96

- well microtiter plate. The plate was then blocked using a proprietary method. Dilutions of each tissue extract and appropriate serial dilutions of eCry3.1Ab referenc e protein (ECRY3.1AB

- 0208), prepared in dilution buffer, were applied to the pre

- coated plates at a total volume of 100 μl/well. The plates were incubated at room temperature on a titre plate shaker at 400 rpm for 1 hour. The plates

were washed five time s with wash buffer in a BioTek ELx405 Microplate Washer. After washing the plates, a secondary, rabbit polyclonal anti

- Cry1Ab antibody (provided in the kit) was then used to bind the Cry1Ab domain of the eCry3.1Ab protein at 100 μl/well. The plates were incubated at room temperature on a titre plate shaker at 400 rpm for one hour

and washed five times as described above.

### Appendix D

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 198 of 211 

### After the plates were washed, a tertiary donkey anti

- rabbit conjugated with alkaline phosphatase diluted in dilution buffer was added to each of the wells (100 μl/well) and incubated at room temperature on a titre plate shaker at 400 rpm for one hour. The plates were then washed five times as described above, and alkaline phosphatase substrate solution provided in the kit was added at a v olume of 100 μl/well. The plates were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature on a titre plate shaker at 400 rpm. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 3N sodium hydroxide (100 μl/well), and absorbance of the reaction was

measured at a dual wa velengths (405 and 492 nm) with a Tecan Sunrise Microplate Reader. The results were analyzed with BioMetallics DeltaSoft PC Microplate Analysis Software, v. 1.71.2, using a four

- parameter algorithm. The results for kernel samples were analyzed with

SoftM ax Pro, v. 5.2, using a four

- parameter algorithm.

The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) or limit of detection (LOD) of eCry3.1Ab is shown

on Table VI

- 2 (Part VI.C.) for any tissue type in which eCry3.1Ab could not be quantified or detected, respectively. The concentrations of eCry3.1Ab in pollen were too low to

determine the efficiency of e xtraction from this tissue. For all other tissues, extraction efficiencies ranged from 75% to 88%; the reported tissue concentrations have been adjusted

for extractio n efficiency.

D.5. PMI Quantification

– Extraction and ELISA Procedures

Buffers



### The buffers used for extraction and ELISA analysis of PMI are listed in the following table :

Name of buffer Constituents

PBS 138 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, 10.1 mM disodium phosphate, 1.8 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate, pH 7.4

Blocking buffer PBS, 1% powdered milk

Borate buffer 0.1 M sodium tetraborate decahydrate, 0.2% PVP

- 360, 7.69 mM sodium azide, 1.2% concentrated hydrochloric acid, 0.5% Tween 20; pH will be approximately 7.5. Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science) added on day of extraction

Carbonate

- bicarbonate buffer 34.9 mM sodium bicarbonate, 15.0 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.5

Citrate

- phosphate buffer 23.8 mM citric acid, 59.9 mM disodium phosphate, pH 5.0

Dilution buffer PBS, 0.05% Tween 20, 1% powdered milk

Wash buffer PBS, 0.05% Tween 20

PMI Extraction



### Leaves, Roots, Whole Plants, and Kernels. A ratio of 3 ml of borate buffer, pH 7.5 was added to 100 mg of lyophilized tissue. The samples were mixed, placed on wet ice for at least 30 minutes, homogenized using an Omni

- Prep Homogenizer, an d centrifuged at 2°C to 8°C to form a pellet. The supernatants were removed and stored at 2°C to 8°C until analysis. For root tissue, the pellet was retained and then processed through the aforementioned extraction procedure again. The supernatant remov ed from the second extraction was combined with that of the first extraction, mixed well and stored at 2°C to 8°C until analysis.

### Appendix D

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 199 of 211 

### Pollen. For each sample, 25 mg of fresh, frozen pollen was weighed into a 2

- ml Eppendorf tube containing three 4

- mm glass bea ds and stored at

- 80°C ± 10 ° C for at least two hours. Each tube was then placed into a Four Station Titer Plate/Micro Tube Grinding Mill and set at ~3000 strokes per minute for approximately 45 seconds. The tubes were then placed on

wet ice and 1.5 ml of borate buffer, pH 7.5 was added to each sample. The samples were mixed and set on wet ice for at least 20 minutes then centrifuged at 2°C to 8°C to form a pellet. The supernatants were removed and stored at 2°C to 8°C until analysis.

PMI Quantification



### Rabbit polyclonal anti

- PMI antibody was diluted in carbonate

- bicarbonate buffer and added

to each well of a 96

- well microtiter plate at a volume of 100 μl/well. The plates were stored overnight in a refrigerator set at 2°C to 8°C. The antibody solution was removed and blocking buffer was added to the plate at a volume of 250 μl/well and then incubated at room temperature for at least 30 minutes. After blocking incubation, the plates were washed five times with wash buffer in a BioTek ELx405 microplate w asher and dilutions of each tissue extract and appropriate serial dilutions of PMI reference protein (PMI

- 0105) prepared in dilution buffer were applied to the plates at a total volume of 100 μl/well. The plates

were incubated at 18°C to 22°C for 2 hours. After incubation, plates were washed five times

as described above and a monoclonal anti

- PMI antibody diluted in dilution buffer was added to the plate at a volume of 100 μl/well and incubated at 18°C to 22°C for one hour.

The plates were washed five tim es after incubation and a horseradish

- peroxidase

- conjugated

rabbit anti

- mouse immunoglobin diluted in dilution buffer was added at a volume of 100 μl/well and incubated at 18°C to 22°C for one hour. After incubation, the plates were washed five times, and TMB substrate solution was added at a volume of 100 μl/well (one tablet per 10 ml of citrate

- phosphate buffer) and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped by addition of 3 M sulfuric acid at a volume of 50 μl/w ell, and the absorbance of the reaction was measured at 450 nm with a Tecan Sunrise microplate reader. The results were analyzed with BioMetallics DeltaSoft PC Microplate Analysis Software, v. 1.71.2, using a four

- parameter algorithm.

The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) or limit of detection (LOD) of PMI is shown on

Table VI

- 3 (Part VI.C. ) for any tissue type in which PMI could not be quantified or detected, respectively. PMI extraction efficiencies ranged from 72% to 95% across al l tissue types analyzed; the reported tissue concentrations have been adjusted for extraction efficiency.5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 200 of 211 

### Appendix E. Compositional Analysis of 5307 Forage and Grain



### This a ppendix describes the methods used to conduct the compositional analysis study

described in Part VII of this P etition, wherein the results are also provided. References for individual methods cited in this appendix are listed at the end of the appendix.

Study Design



### Forage and grain for compositional analyses were harvested from multiple locations planted in the U.S. in 2008. The locations chosen were representative of major corn producing regions in the country. For all locations, trials were planted with a 5307 hybrid and near

isogenic, nontransgenic hybrid in a randomized complete block design with three replicated plots, and were managed following local agronomic practices. The plants were self

pollinated by hand and the developing ears were bagged to avoid cross

- pollination. Trials were planted in eight locations in an effort to ensure that grain and forage from at least six

locations could be harvested in the event of loss due to adverse environmental conditions (early freeze, drought, etc

. ). Six locations that produced sufficient grain and forage were selected for this study (see Part VII.B.1 ).

Forage Sampling and Processing



### For each genotype, t he entire above

- ground port ion of five plants from each of the three replicate plots at each location was harvested at dough stage (R4), the stage at which silage typically is prepared. Plants were pooled to create a composite sample for each replicate plot, then ground using a chi pper

- shredder. A subsample from each well

- mixed composite sample was shipped overnight on ice packs to Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (Greensboro, NC). The samples were stored at

– 20°C ± 10°C, then finely ground and shipped on dry ice

to a contract resea rch laboratory , where they were stored at

– 20°C ± 10°C until they were analyzed.

Grain Sampling and Processing



### For each genotype, ears were collected from 15 plants from each replicate plot at each location. Ears were harvested after reaching physiologica l maturity (R6) and then mechanically dried to approximately 9% to 12% moisture content. (Mechanical drying after harvest is standard practice for improving storage characteristics of corn grain.) Each sample consisted of grain shelled from ears collected from 15 plants from one replicate plot. A

well

- mixed subsample of approximately 500 g of grain from each plot was shipped at ambient temperature to Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., where it was stored at

– 20°C ± 10°C, then finely ground and shipped on dry ice to the contract testing facililty . The samples were stored at

– 20°C ± 10°C until they were analyzed.

### Appendix E

Compositional Analyses



### As detailed in Table VII

- 1 3 (Part VII of this P etition), forage was analyzed for proximates

and the minerals calcium and phosphorus. Grain was analyzed for major constituents (proximates, including starch), minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and selected

anti

- nutrients and secondary metabolites.

All compositional analyses were conducted using methods published and approved by AOAC International, or other industry

- standard analytical methods (described below). Based on the moisture content of each sample, analyte levels were converted to equivalent units of dry weight.

Statistical Analyses



### Across

- location comparisons

The data for each variate (component) were subjected to analysis of variance using the following mixed model (Obert et al., 2004) :

Y

ijk 

### = U + T i 

### + L j 

### + B(L) jk 

### + LT ij 

### + e ijk



### In this model, Y ijk 

### is the observed response for genotype i at location j block k

, U is the overall mean, T i 

### is the genotype effect, L j 

### is the location effect, B(L) jk 

### is the effect of block within a location, LT ij 

### is the location

- by

- genotype interaction effect, and e ijk 

### is th e residual error. Genotype was regarded as a fixed effect, while the effects of location, block within location, and location

- by

- genotype were regarded as random. For each quantifiable component, an F test was used to assess the statistical significance of the genotype effect with an alpha level of 0.05 and with the denominator degrees of freedom determined using

the Kenward

- Roger method (Kenward and Roger, 1997). Moisture content of grain was not statistically analyzed because the samples had been mecha nically dried.

Individual

- location comparisons

The data for each variate at each location were subjected to an analysis of variance with genotype and block included in the statistical model. Significance was based on an alpha level of 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS v. 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary NC).

Comparison with ILSI Crop Composition Database


### The mean levels of each component for each location and across locations were calculated and compared nonstatistically with means and ranges for forage and grain composition published in the ILSI Crop Composi tion Database (2008). The ILSI database is the most comprehensive and current source of crop composition data for most nutritional
components.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 202 of 211 

### Analytical Methods and Reference Standards for Compositional Analysis

2

- Furaldehyde (Albala

- Hurtado et al., 1997)



### The ground sample was extracted with 4% trichloroacetic acid and injected directly on a high

- performance liquid chromatography system for quantitation of free furfurals by ultraviolet detection. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for this study was 0.5 00 ppm,

calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Acid Detergent Fiber (USDA, 1970) 

### : Acros 2

- Furaldehyde, 99.7%, Lot Number A0219180

The sample was washed with acetone to remove fats and pigments. It was then placed in a filter bag and positioned in an Ankom analyzer where it was washed with an acidic boiling detergent solution that dissolved the protein, carbohydrate, and ash. The lignocellulose fraction remaining was determined gravimetrically. The LOQ for this study was 0.100%,

calc ulated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Amino Acid Composition (AOAC, 2005k)



### Total aspartic acid (including asparagine)

Total threonine

Total serine Total glutamic acid (including glutamine) Total proline Total glycine

Total alanine

Total valine

Total isoleucine

Total leucine Total tyrosine Total phenylalanine

Total histidine Total lysine Total arginine Total tryptophan

Sulfur

- containing amino acids: Total methionine Total cystine (including cysteine)

The sample was assayed by three methods to obtain the full pro file. Tryptophan required a base hydrolysis with sodium hydroxide. The sulfur

- containing amino acids required an oxidation with performic acid prior to hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid. Analysis of the samples for the remaining amino acids was accompli shed through direct acid hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid. Once hydrolyzed, the individual amino acids were then quantitated using an automated amino acid analyzer. The LOQ for each amino acid assay was 0.100 mg/g, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 203 of 211 

### R eference Standards

Sigma, L

- Tryptophan, 100%, Lot Number 076K0075 : ThermoScientific K18, 2.5 μmol/mL per constituent except cystine (1.25 μmol/mL), Lot Number JK126327

Sigma/BioChemika, L

- Cysteic Acid Monohydrate, >99% (used as 100%), Lot Number 1305674

Sigma, L

- Methionine Sulfone, 100%, Lot Number 047K1321

Ash (AOAC, 2005b)



### The sample was placed in an electric furnace at 550°C and ignited to drive off all volatile organic matter. The nonvolatile matter remaining was quantitated gravimetrically and calculated to determine percent ash. The LOQ for this study was 0.100%, calcu lated on a

fresh

- weight basis.

Beta

- Carotene (AOAC, 2005e; Quackenbush, 1987)



### The sample was saponified and extracted with hexane. The sample was then injected on a reverse phase high

- performance liquid chromatography system with ultraviolet light

detect ion. Quantitation was achieved with a linear regression analysis. The LOQ for beta

carotene was 0.0200 mg/100 g, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Carbohydrates (USDA, 1973) 

### : Sigma

- Aldrich, Beta

- carotene, Type I, 100% (stock standard

concentration determined s pectrophotometrically), Lot Number

068K2561

The total carbohydrate level was calculated by difference using the fresh weight

- derived data and the following equation:

% carbohydrates = 100 %

- (% protein + % fat + % moisture + % ash)

The LOQ for this study was 0.100%, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Fat by Acid Hydrolysis (AOAC, 2005a)



### The sample was hydrolyzed with hydrochloric acid at an elevated temperature. The fat was extracted with ether and hexane. The extract was evap orated on a steambath, redissolved in hexane and filtered through a sodium sulfate column. The hexane extract was then vaporated again on a steambath under nitrogen, dried, and weighed. The LOQfor this study was 0.1%, calculated on a fresh weight basis.

Fatty Acids (AOAC, 2005 l ; AOCS, 1997b and 2001)



### The lipid was extracted and saponified with 0.5N sodium hydroxide in methanol. The saponification mixture was methylated with 14% boron trifluoride in methanol. The resulting methyl esters were extracted with heptane containing an internal standard. The methyl esters of the fatty acids were analyzed by gas chromatography using external standards for quantitation. The LOQ was 0.00500%, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 204 of 211 

### Reference Standards

Nu Chek Prep GLC Reference Standard Hazelton No. 1, Lot Number AU18

- S :

Nu Chek Prep GLC Reference Standard Hazelton No. 2, Lot Number M13

- O Nu Chek Prep GLC Reference Standard Hazelton No. 3, Lot Number MA18

- S Nu Chek Prep GLC Reference Standard Hazelton No. 4, Lot Number JA16

- T Nu Chek Prep Methyl Gamma Linolenate, used as 100%, Lot Number U

- 63M

- JY12

- R Nu Chek Prep Methyl Tridecanoate, used as 100%, Lot Number N

- 13M

- JA16

- T

Folic acid (AOAC, 2005i; Infant Formula Council, 1985)



### The sample was hydrolyzed in a potassium phosphate buffer with the addition of ascorbic acid to protect the folic acid during autoclaving. Following hydrolysis by autoclaving, the sample was treated with a chicken

- pancreas enzyme and incubated approximate ly 18 hours to liberate the bound folic acid. The amount of folic acid was determined by comparing the growth response of the sample, using the bacteria Lactobacillus casei , with the growth response of a folic acid standard. This response was measured tu rbidimetrically. The LOQ was 0.00600 mg/100 g, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

ICP Emission Spectrometry (AOAC, 2005m) 

### : USP, Folic acid, 98.9%, Lot Number Q0G151

The sample was dried, precharred, and ashed overnight in a muffle se t to maintain 500 ° C. The ashed sample was re

- ashed with nitric acid, treated with hydrochloric acid, taken to dryness, and put into a solution of 5% hydrochloric acid. The amount of each element was determined at appropriate wavelengths by comparing the emission of the unknown sample, measured on the inductively coupled plasma spectrometer, with the emission of the standard solutions. The LOQs ( Table E

- 1 ) were calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 205 of 211 Table E

- 1

. Inorganic Ventures Reference Standards and Limits of Quantitation

Mineral Lot Numbers Calibration Standard Concentration (μg/ml) LOQ (ppm)

Calcium B2

- MEB280039

B2

- MEB266040 200

1000 20.0

Copper B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB280036 2
10 0.50

Iron B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB280035 10
50 2.00

Magnesium B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB280036 50
250 20.0

Manganese B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB280036 2
10 0.30

Phosphorus B2

- MEB280039

B2

- MEB266040 200

1000 20.0

Potassium B2

- MEB280039

B2

- MEB266040 200

1000 100

Sodium B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB266040 200
1000 100

Zinc B2

- MEB280039
B2

- MEB280036 10
50 0.40

ICP

- Mass Spectrometry (AOAC, 2005o)



### The sample was wet

- ashed with nitric acid using microwave digestion. Using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, the amount of each element was determined by comparing the counts generated by the unknowns to those generated by standard solutions of known concentrations. The LOQ for this study was 50.0 ppb, calculated on a fresh

- weight

basis.

Reference Standard

Inositol (Infant Formula Council, 1985b; Atkins et al., 1943) 

### : SPEX, Selenium, 100 mg/L, Lot Num ber 6

- 74GS

The inositol sample was extracted with dilute hydrochloric acid at a high temperature. The amount of inositol was determined by comparing the growth response of the sample, using the yeast Saccharomyces carlsbergenesis , with the growth response of an inos itol standard. The response was measured turbidimetrically. The LOQ for this study was 40.0 μg/g,

calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Moisture (AOAC, 2005c) 

### : Sigma

- Aldrich, Myo

- Inositol, 100%, Lot Number 065K0018

The sample was dried in a vacuum oven at approximately 100°C to a constant weight. The moisture weight loss was determined and converted to percent moisture. The LOQ for this study was 0.100%, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 206 of 211 Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), Enzyme Method ( AACC, 1998; USDA, 1970)



### The sample was washed with acetone to remove fats and pigments. It was then placed in a filter bag and positioned in an Ankom analyzer where it was washed with a neutral boiling detergent solution that dissolved the protein, carboh ydrate, enzyme, and ash. The remaining hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin fractions were determined gravimetrically. The LOQ for this study was 0.100%.

Niacin (AOAC, 2005g)



### The sample was hydrolyzed with sulfuric acid and the pH was adjusted to remove interferences. The amount of niacin was determined by comparing the growth response of the sample, using the bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum, with the growth response of a niacin standard. This response was measured turbidimetrically. The LOQ for this study was 0.0300 mg/100 g.

Reference Standard:

p

- Coumaric Acid and Ferulic Acid (Hagerman and Nicholson, 1982) 

### USP, Niacin, 99.8%, Lot Number I0E295

The sample was extracted with methanol using ultrasonication, hydrolyzed using 4N sodium hydroxide, buffered using acetic acid/sodium hydroxide, acidified with 3N hydrochloric acid, and filtered. The levels of p

- coumaric and ferulic acids in the extract were determined by reverse phase high

- performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The LOQ for p

- coumaric acid and ferulic acid was 50.0 ppm, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standards

Acros Organics, p

- Hydroxycinnamic acid (p

- co umaric Acid), 99.4%, Lot Number A0236839 : Acros Organics, 4

- Hydroxy

- 3

- methoxycinnamic acid (ferulic acid), 99.4%, Lot Number A0248008

Phytic Acid (Lehrfeld, 1989 and 1994 

### )

The sample was extracted using 0.5 M HCl with ultrasonication. Purification and concentration were accomplished on a silica

- based anion

- exchange column. The sample was analy zed on a polymer high

- performance liquid chromatography column PRP

- 1, 5 μm (150 x 4.1 mm) with a refractive index detector. The LOQ for this study was approximately 0.100%, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Protein (AOAC, 2005h; Bradstreet, 1965; Kalthoff and Sandell, 1948) 

### : Aldrich, Phytic Acid, Dod ecasodium Salt Hydrate, 95%,

Lot Number 077K0693

Nitrogenous compounds in the sample were reduced in the presence of boiling sulfuric acid and a mercury catalyst mixture to form ammonia. The acid digest was made alkaline. The ammonia was distilled and then titrated with a previously standardized acid. The percent nitrogen was calculated and converted to protein using the factor 6.25. The LOQ for this study was 0.100%, calculated on a f resh

- weight basis.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 207 of 211 Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (AOAC, 2005j; Atkins et al., 1943)



### The sample was hydrolyzed with dilute sulfuric acid in the autoclave and the pH was adjusted to remove interferences. The amount of pyridoxine was determined by comparing the growth response of the sample, using the yeast Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, wit h the growth response of a pyridoxine standard. The response was measured turbidimetrically. Results were reported as pyridoxine hydrochloride. The LOQ for this study was 0.00700 mg/100 g, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Raffinose (Brobst, 1972; Mason and Stover, 1971) 

### : USP, Py ridoxine hydrochloride, 99.8%, Lot Number Q0G409

The sample was extracted with deionized water and the extract treated with a hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution in pyridine, containing phenyl

- β

- D

- glucoside as an internal standard. The resulting oximes were converted to silyl derivatives by treatment with hexamethyldisilazane and trifluoracetic acid and analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector. The acceptable LOQ for this study was 0.100%, calculated on a fresh weight basis.

Reference Standards

Starch (AOAC, 2005p) 

### : Sigma, D(+)

- Raffinose Pentahydrate, 99% (84.0% after correction for

degree of hydration), Lot Number 037K1059

The sample was extracted with alcohol to remove carbohydrates other than starch, i.e. sugars. Then it was hydrolyzed into glucose with α

- amylase and amyloglucosidase. Glucose was oxidized with glucose oxidase to form peroxide, which reacted with a dye in the presence of peroxidase to give a stable co lored product proportional to glucose concentration. The glucose concentration was quantitated by measurement on a spectrophotometer at 540 nm. Percent starch was then calculated from the glucose concentration. The LOQ for this study was 0.05%, calculat ed on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard : Sigma D(+)

- Glucose, 99.9%, Lot Number 123K0095

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 208 of 211 Thiamine Hydrochloride (AOAC, 2005f) 

### The sample was autoclaved under weak acid conditions to extract the thiamine. The resulting solution was incubated with a buffered enzyme solution to release any bound thiamine. The solution was purified on a cation

- exchange column. An aliquot was reacted with potassium ferricyanide to convert thiamine to thiochrome. The thiochrome was extracted into isobutyl alcohol, m easured on a fluorometer, and quantitated by comparison to a known standard. The limit of quantitation was calculated and reported on a fresh weight basis. The LOQ for this study was 0.01 mg/100 g. Results were reported as thiamine hydrochloride.

Refer ence Standard

Total Dietary Fiber (TDF) (AOAC, 2005n) 

### : USP, Thiamine Hydrochloride, Purity 99.8% (used as 95.9% after

correction for moisture content), Lot Number 01F236

Duplicate samples were gelatinized with α

- amylase and digested with enzymes to break

do wn starch and protein. Ethanol was added to each sample to precipitate the soluble fiber. The samples were filtered, and the residue was rinsed with ethanol and acetone to remove starch and protein degradation products and moisture. Protein content was determined for one of the duplicates; ash content was determined for the other. The total dietary fiber in the sample was calculated using the protein and ash values. The LOQ for this study was 1.00%,

calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Trypsin Inhibitor (AOCS, 1997a) 

### The sample was ground and defatted with petroleum ether. A sample of matrix was extracted with 0.01N sodium hydroxide. Varying aliquots of the sample suspension were exposed to a known amount of trypsin and benzoy1

- DL

- argi nine~p~nitroanilide hydrochloride. The sample was allowed to react for 10 minutes at 37°C. After 10 minutes, the reaction was halted by the addition of acetic acid. The solution was centrifuged, then the absorbance was determined at 410 nm. Trypsin inh ibitor activity was determined by photometrically measuring the inhibition of trypsin’s reaction with benzoyl

- DL

arginine~p~nitroanilide hydrochloride. The LOQ for this study was 1.00 Trypsin Inhibitor Units (TIU)/mg, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

V itamin B2 (Riboflavin) (AOAC, 2005d; US Pharmacopeia, 2005) 

### The sample was hydrolyzed with dilute hydrochloric acid and the pH was adjusted to remove interferences. The amount of riboflavin was determined by comparing the growth response of the sample, us ing the bacteria Lactobacillus casei , with the growth response of multipoint riboflavin standards. The growth response was measured turbidimetrically. The LOQ for this study was 0.0200 mg/100 g, calculated on a fresh

- weight basis.

Reference Standard

Vitamin E (Cort et al., 1983; McMurray et al., 1980; Speek et al., 1983) 

### : U SP, Riboflavin, 100%, Lot Number N0C021

The sample was saponified to break down any fat and release vitamin E. The saponified mixture was extracted with ethyl ether and then quantita ted by high

- performance liquid chromatography using a silica column. The LOQ for this study was 0.500 mg/100 g, calculated on a fresh weight basis.

Reference Standard : USP, Alpha

- Tocopherol, 100%, Lot Number M

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 209 of 211 

### References Cited in Appendix E



### AACC (1998). Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists , 9th Ed., Method 32.20. AACC International: St. Paul, Minnesota.

Albala

- Hurtado, S., M. T. Veciana

- Nogues, M. Izquierdo

- Pulido, and M. C. Vidal

- Carou (1997). Determination of free and total furfural compounds in infant milk formulas by high

- performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

45 : 2128

- 2133.

AOAC (2005a Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods

Methods 922 .06 and 954.02, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005b). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 923.03, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005c). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTER NATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods 926.08 and 925.09, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005d). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods 940.33 and 960.46, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005e) Of ficial Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 941.15, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005f). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods 942.23, 953.17, and 957.17, AOAC International: Gai thersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005g). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 944.13, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005h). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed.,

Methods 955.04 and 9 79.09, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005i). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods 960.46 and 992.05, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005j). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INT ERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 961.15, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005k). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 982.30, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005l). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 983.23, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005m). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Methods 984.27 and 985.01, AOAC International: Gaithersbu rg, Maryland.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 210 of 211 

### AOAC (2005n) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 985.29, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005o). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 993.14, AOAC Internati onal: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOAC (2005p). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 18th Ed., Method 996.11, AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.

AOCS (1997a). Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS , 5th Ed.

Method Ba 12

- 75. American Oil Chemists’ Society: Champaign, Illinois.

AOCS (1997b). Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS , 5th Ed.

Method Ce 2

- 66. American Oil Chemists’ Society: Champaign, Illinois.

AOCS (2001). Official Methods and Recomm ended Practices of the AOCS , 5th Ed. Method

Ce 1e

- 92. American Oil Chemists’ Society: Champaign, Illinois.

Atkins, L., A. S. Schultz, W. L. Williams, and C. N. Frey (1943). Yeast microbiological

methods for determination of vitamins. Industrial and Eng ineering Chemistry, Analytical Edition 15 : 141

- 144.

Bradstreet, R. B. (1965). The Kjeldahl Method for Organic Nitrogen. Academic Press: New York, New York.

Brobst, K. M. (1972). Gas

- liquid chromatography of trimethylsilyl derivatives. In:

Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Volume 6: General Carbohydrate Methods . R.

N. Whistler and J. N. BeMiller, Eds. Academic Press: New York, New York.

Cort, W. M., T. S. Vincente, E. H. Waysek, and B. D. Williams (1983). Vitamin E content

of feedstuffs determine d by high

- performance liquid chromatographic fluorescence. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 31 : 1330

- 1333.

Hagerman, A. E. and R. L. Nicholson (1982). High

- performance liquid chromatographic determination of hydroxycinnamic acids in maize mesocotyl. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 30 : 1098

- 1102

ILSI (2008). International Life Sciences Institute C rop Composition Database, v. 3.0. http://www.cropcomposition.org/cgi

- perl/search_ora.cgi; search parameters: crop type = “CORN_FIELD,” tissue type = “FORAGE” or “GRAIN,” crop year = “All”, country = “All,” and state = “All”; searching not restricted by ana lysis method or value range (accessed February 9, 2010).

Infant Formula Council (1985a). Methods of Analysis for Infant Formulas. Section C

- 2. Atlanta, Georgia.

Infant Formula Council (1985b). Methods of Analysis for Infant Formulas. Section C

- 7.

At lanta, Georgia.

### Appendix E

5307

- USDA

- 1 Page 211 of 211 

### Kalthoff, I. M. and E. B. Sandell (1948). Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. MacMillan: New

York.

Kenward, M. G. and J. H. Roger (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from

restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53 : 983

– 997.

Lehrfeld, J. (1989). High

- performance liquid chromatography analysis of phytic acid on a pH

- stable, macroporous polymer column. Cereal Chemistry 66 : 510

- 515.

Lehrfeld, J. (1994). HPLC separation and quantitation of phytic acid and some inositol phosphates in foods: Problem and solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 42 : 2726

- 2731.

Mason, B. S. and H. T. Slover (1971). A gas chromatographic me thod for the determination of sugars in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 19: 551

- 554.

McMurray, C. H., W. J. Blanchflower, and D. A. Rice (1980). Influence of extraction techniques on determination of alpha

- tocopherol in animal feedstu ffs. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 63 : 1258

- 1261.

Obert, J.C., W.P. Ridley, R.W. Schneider, S.G. Riordan, M.A. Nemeth, W.A. Trujillo, M.L. Breeze, R. Sorbet, and J.D. Astwood. (2004). The composition of grain and forage

fro m glyphosate tolerant wheat MON 71800 is equivalent to that of conventional wheat ( Triticum aestivum L .) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 1375

- 1384. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10. 1021/jf035218u

.

Quackenbush, F. W. (1987). Reverse phase HPLC separation of cis

- and trans

- carotenoids and its application to β

- carotenes in food materials. Journal of Liquid Chro matography

10 : 643

- 653.

Speek, A. J., J. Schijver, and W. H. P. Schreurs (1983) Vitamin E composition of some seed oils as determined by high

- performance liquid chromatography with fluorometric quantitation. Journal of Food Science 50 : 121

- 124.

USDA (1970). Forage fiber analy ses. Agriculture Handbook No. 379 . United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC.

USDA (1973). Energy value of foods. Agriculture Handbook No. 74, pp. 2

- 11

. United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC.

US Pharmacopeia (2005). The United States Pharmacopeia, Twenty

- Ninth Revision, p. 1913, United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.: Rockville, Maryland.