alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928420
<NAME> COHESANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         116,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,186,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                   164,100
<INVENTORY>                                  3,434,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,892,221
<PP&E>                                       1,368,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                 742,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,725,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,480,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,688
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,193,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,725,399
<SALES>                                      3,844,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,844,303
<CGS>                                        2,126,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,126,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               265,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,069
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                372,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                   131,476
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            241,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   241,067
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                               |

----
Exhibit 24.10

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadiancorporation (the "Company"), proposes shortly to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Actof 1934 as amended (the "Act"), the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuantto Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.

WHEREAS, the undersigned is anOfficer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersignedhereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington, D. McAusland and P. Chenard andeach of them, as attorneys for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name,place and stead, and in each of the undersigned's offices and capacities as anOfficer and/or a Director of the Company, to execute and file such AnnualReport on Form 10-K, hereby giving and granting to said attorneys full powerand authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoeverrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to allintents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personallypresent at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand this 11th day of March 2005. 

 

| Signed:   /s/ Milton K. Wong              Name:    Milton K. WongTitle:       Director |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                     As Adopted Pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 26, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Ludger Viefhues, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|Date: May 26, 2006 | /s/ Ludger Viefhues
                     Ludger ViefhuesChief Financial Officer
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
## Imperial Sugar Co., Imperial-Savannah

Secretary of Labor v. Imperial Sugar Co., Imperial-Savannah, L.P.**OSHRC Docket 08-1104**

 

Last Updated: May 17, 2010
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1165 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Segal AmeriCorps 

5 Education Award Tax Relief Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS 

7 EDUCATIONAL AWARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (B), by striking the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1165 IH

1 period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘, 

2 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new subpara3 graph: 

4 ‘‘(D) a national service educational award 

5 under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

6 Community Service Act of 1990.’’. 

7 (b) EXCLUSION OF DISCHARGE OF STUDENT LOAN

8 DEBT.—Subsection (f) of section 108 of such Code is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new para10 graph: 

11 ‘‘(5) PAYMENTS UNDER NATIONAL SERVICE

12 EDUCATIONAL AWARD PROGRAMS.—In the case of 

13 an individual, gross income shall not include any 

14 amount received under a national service educational 

15 award under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

16 Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 

17 et seq.).’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Willoughby D. Barnard *v.*Arthur Gregory *Ex'r. of*Jonathan Roberts.

'■One who sets up a claim to goods of an intestate, under a fraudulent conveyance, and thereby injures the sale of them, does not render himself an executor *de soil tori.*

Debt upon a single bond ; and on the trial before his Honor Judge Martin, at Camden, on the last circuit, the only question was upon the plea of *munques executor.*To make the defendant an executor of his own wrong) the plaintiff proved that the Sheriff having an execution, the *testé*of which overreached the death of Roberts, levied it upon a negro in his possession at his death ; that the defendant at the sale produced an unregistered bill of sale fob the same negro and claimed title *;*that the slave¿ in consequence of this claim, went at a small price, and that the defendant paid the purchaser an advance upon his hid, and took a bill of sale from the sheriff to himself»

The plaintiff then offered evidence, tending to prove tllat the defendant’s bill of sale from *Roberts*was fraudulent and contended in that case, that the defendant by forbidding the sale, and causing the negro to sell for less than its value, liad,made himself an executor of his own wrong. But his Honor being of a different opinion, directed the jury to find for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Kimmj,*for the plaintiff.

*Iredell,*'for the defendant.

Haee» Judge.

‘An executor of his own wrong is defined to he a person, who without any authority inter-meddles with the estate of the deceased, and does such acts as properly belong to the officé of an executor or administrator. *(Went Off. of Ex.*171). And by *stat.*43 *Eliz. ch.*8, he is declared to be an executor of his own wrong, who holds any goods of, or who owes any debt to the intestate, for which he holds a fraudulent release or discharge, and without such valuable consideration as shall amount to the value of the same goods or -debts or thereabouts.

*224But I am not aware that it has ever been adjudged, that a person was an executor of his own wrong, who has not intermeddled with the estate of the deceased, or who does not hold any ofhis estate in his hands, but who only sets up a claim against the estate, although that claim may not be a valid, but in truth a fraudulent one. This may have been the defendant’s case, but it has not been proved. It is not stated, although probably the fact was so, that *Roberts’*estate was insolvent. Nor has it been made to appear, that the defendant’s unregistered bill of sale was fraudulent. To be sure it appears that he had not all confidence in it, when he purchased the title of the person who bid off the negro. Be that as it may, I think the judge did not err when he decided, that although the bill of sale was fraudulent, and although the defendant forbid the sale, claiming under it, and thereby caused the property to sell for a loss price, yet that did not constitute him an'executor of his own wrong.

¡Per Curiam — Judgment aeeirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E75]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING MARY ANN RIOJAS

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JIM COSTA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, January 13, 2009

  Mr. COSTA. Madam Speaker, I rise today along with my colleague from 
California Mr. Nunes to commend and congratulate Mary Ann Riojas upon 
being honored by ABC's reality show ``Extreme Makeover: Home Edition.'' 
Ms. Riojas and family were surprised by Ty Pennington and crew on 
January 8, 2009 at their home in central Fresno located on East 
Robinson, Fresno, CA, at the heart of the Central Valley.
  Ms. Riojas was born without legs and only one fully developed arm. As 
a child, Mary Ann was placed in foster care and grew up in an unstable 
household and poverty. Even though Mary Ann was no stranger to 
adversity her challenges continued after expanding her family with four 
children. In financial distress she turned to public assistance to keep 
her family afloat.
  Regardless of Mary Ann's disabilities and financial struggles she 
continued to live life to the fullest. Her vibrant determination led 
her to become the first in her family to earn a college degree when she 
graduated in 2002 from San Joaquin Valley College with an associate 
degree in Business Administration. She also obtained a drivers license 
in 2002 which gave her the ability to drive a special hand-controlled 
vehicle.
  Determined to excel, Mary Ann not only became an employee of Easter 
Seals but also served as a State and national Ambassador. She has 
traveled all over the country with the Easter Seals program, spreading 
her joy and enthusiasm for life. Mary Ann eventually switched jobs and 
decided to help others in her community and that is when she began 
working for the Fresno Housing Authority as a counselor to other 
families who are struggling with life's adversities.
  Mary Ann does not see herself as a person with disabilities. Mary Ann 
is a strong woman who has raise four children Nichole 18, Victoria 17, 
Angel 15, and Jessie 14, and she continues to inspire others on a daily 
basis. The Extreme Makeover: Home Edition will forever change her life 
and make her home a better and more user friendly place for her to 
enjoy with her children.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today to commend and congratulate Mary Ann 
Riojas. I invite my colleagues to join me in wishing Ms. Riojas and her 
family many years of continued success.

                          ____________________
```
OSMRE NEPA HANDBOOK 1 JULY 2019

APPENDIX 3.1 OSMRE REVIEW PROCESS FOR AML ENVIRONMENTAL 

DOCUMENTS

The OSMRE Review Process for AML Environmental Documents 

Prepared by a State or Tribal Agency 

for NEPA Compliance 

After the state or tribal agency completes the required environmental review document, the state 

or tribal agency must send the completed environmental document to the appropriate OSMRE 

awarding office for review. 

Review Process

1. The awarding office will conduct a systematic review to determine adequacy of 

the environmental document. This review may include a site visit to verify the 

accuracy of information in the document.

2. Any issues raised during review of the document should be resolved with the state 

or tribe through telephone conversations, meetings or site visits.

3. If the document is adequate, the RD or authorized official signs the FONSI or 

Categorical Exclusion Determination, and notifies the state or tribal agency that 

the NEPA review is complete.

If the environmental document is not adequate, the awarding office may return the 

environmental document to the state or tribe with the reasons why it is not 

adequate, or may supplement the document as needed to make it adequate. 

Although rare, the awarding office could determine that a detailed environmental 

impact statement is required. If so, the awarding office will notify the state or 

tribe with the reasons why. 

4. The awarding office will select AML projects to inspect during and after 

construction to confirm the implementation of any commitments or stipulations 

stated in the environmental document.
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

 Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

ALL STAR REALTY COMPANY, INC.,

d/b/a ALL STAR REALTY & 

CONSTRUCTION CO.,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 12-1597

BRIEFING NOTICE 

 The Commission requests that the parties brief the following issues: 

(1) Did the Secretary establish that All Star Realty Company (“All Star”) was an employer of 

the workers referenced in the citation? In addressing this question, the parties are asked 

to discuss the evidence in this case as it relates to the factors set out in Nationwide 

Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 323-24 (1992). See Sharon & Walter 

Constr., Inc., 23 BNA OSHC 1286, 1289, 2011 CCH OSHD ¶ 33,103, pp. 54,896-97 

(No. 00-1402, 2010). In particular, the parties should address the factors relating to the 

extent of All Star’s “right to control the manner and means by which the product [was] 

accomplished,” including: 

(a) the extent of the workers’ discretion over when and how long to work; 

(b) whether All Star had the right to assign additional projects to the workers; 

(c) the source of the instrumentalities and tools used by the workers; and 

(d) the method of payment. 

(2) In answering the employment relationship question, the parties are asked to identify what 

assignment and instructions, if any, All Star gave to the workers with respect to the site 

where the subject inspection was conducted. 

(3) If an employment relationship existed, did the judge err in concluding that the Secretary 

failed to establish that All Star had constructive knowledge of the violative conditions? 

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose. 
2

All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.1 The first brief is to be 

filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief must notify the 

Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable time for filing 

briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or similar notices of 

intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: March 21, 2013 /s/

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

 

1

The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles, and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE REGISTRANT IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. [***] INDICATES THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED.

 

Exhibit 10.30

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT

 

Dated as of July 2, 2018

 

Between:

 

AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, as Seller

 

and

 

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Buyer

 

1.                                      THIS AMENDMENT

 

The Parties agree hereby to amend the Master Repurchase Agreement dated August 17, 2017 between AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Original MRA”, as amended hereby and supplemented, further amended or restated hereafter from time to time, the “MRA”) to extend the latest Termination Date, and they hereby amend the Original MRA as follows.

 

All capitalized terms used in the Original MRA and used, but not defined differently, in this amendment (the “First Amendment to MRA” or within itself only, this “Amendment”) have the same meanings here as there.

 

The numbered Paragraphs of this Amendment are numbered to correspond with the numbers of the Paragraphs of the Original MRA amended hereby and are consequently sometimes nonsequential.

 

2.                                      Definitions; Interpretation

 

(a)                                 Definitions

 

The definition of Termination Date is amended to read as follows:

 

“Termination Date” means the earliest of (i) the Business Day, if any, that Seller or Buyer designates as the Termination Date by written notice given to the other Party at least [***] days before such date, (ii) the Business Day, if any, that Buyer designates as the Termination Date by written notice given to Seller at any time after [***] days shall have elapsed after any Change in Control, (iii) the date of declaration of the Termination Date pursuant to Section 12(b)(i) and (iv) September 20, 2018.

 

(The remainder of this page is intentionally blank)

 











 

As amended hereby, the MRA remains in full force and effect, and the Parties hereby ratify and confirm it.

 


	
JPMORGAN   CHASE BANK, N.A.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Carolyn W. Johnson
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Authorized Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
AMERIHOME   MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
Occupational Safety And Health Review Commission
Commissioners' Monthly Docket Report at Close of Business on April 30, 2023 DOCKET
NUMBERRESPONDENT'S
NAMEDOCKETED
TYPE*
BRIEFING
NOTICE DATEBRIEFING STATUSCOMMISSIONER NOT PARTICIPATING118-0701Midvale Paper Box Company, Inc.10/21/21DFR11/09/21Closed220-0653Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.10/28/21DFR11/05/21Closed319-0622Anthony Marano Co.02/10/22DFR02/16/22Closed420-0541Harvey Builders d/b/a Harvey Cleary Builders03/03/22DFR03/11/22Closed521-0432Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a Liberty Tax Service07/01/22DFR07/13/22Closed620-1212Roy Rock, LLC07/14/22DFR07/15/22Closed720-0232U.S. Ceiling Corp.09/29/22DFR10/05/22Closed821-0794U.S. Postal Service - Canovanas Post Office11/16/22DFR11/18/22Open920-0032UHS of Fuller, Inc.,
UHS of Delaware, Inc.03/02/23DFR03/20/23Open1021-0295Poinsett Hutterian Brethren, Inc.03/16/23DFR03/27/23Open1120-1437K.M. Davis Contracting Co., Inc.03/23/23DFR03/31/23Open1217-0053Joon, LLC d/b/a Ajin USA03/23/23DFR03/29/23Open1320-0559MasTec Services, Inc.04/04/23DFR04/06/23Open1419-1667A Crane Rental LLC04/27/23DFR04/27/23Open *DFR - Direction For Review
  REM - Appellate Remand
  INT REV - Interlocutory Review
 




Page 2 of 2