alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,    certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K/A-2    of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      BY: /s/  VICTOR    M. PEREZ    VICTOR M. PEREZ    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     DATE: July 21, 2006
Exhibit 99.14


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Wyeth (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 12, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Kenneth J. Martin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 31, 2003
                                         By /s/   Kenneth J. Martin
                                         -------------------------------
                                                  Kenneth J. Martin
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
No. 82-5806.

No. 82-5919.

#### In re DeJarnette; and In re Faraci.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H144-H145]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Neugebauer) is recognized for 5 minutes.

[[Page H145]]

  (Mr. NEUGEBAUER addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for April 2022

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month							21

2. Cases Added to Docket								 	 0



3. Cases Subtracted from Docket							 	-3
AJM Packaging Corporation 
16-1865
Decision on April 1, 2022

New River Electrical Corporation
18-0523
Remand Order on April 6, 2022

Midwest Equipment Company
19-0723
Decision on April 15, 2022


4. Total Cases Pending End of Month							18
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E62]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BEN CHANDLER

                              of kentucky

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. CHANDLER. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize Israel's 
enduring friendship with the United States of America, as well as its 
right to self-defense in an appropriate and proportional manner from 
the threats posed to it by its neighbors who seek its demise.
  As most Palestinians hunger for peace, the actions of Hamas, 
sponsored by Iran and often attempting to maximize Palestinian civilian 
casualties, make this road to peace much more difficult. Israel 
withdrew from Gaza in 2005, hoping that this withdrawal would usher in 
peace between the two rivals. However, since 2005 Hamas has fired 
thousands of rockets into Israel. Over the past 6 weeks alone, Hamas, 
outside the confines of the ceasefire agreement, fired hundreds of 
rockets and mortars into Israel without warning, killing men, women and 
children. These continuous acts of terror have left Israel with no 
other choice but to defend its citizens.
  An important and reliable ally in an unstable region, Israel is 
fundamental to our foreign policy in the Middle East. I am disappointed 
to see an end to the 6-month ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, as 
this ultimately leads to more civilian casualties on both sides. 
However, I think it is important to recognize that Israel faces great 
threats along its border from which it has every right to defend 
itself.
  During the 6-month ceasefire, Israel's support of the people of 
Gaza--such as supplying food, medical and other supplies--was 
commendable. This assistance highlights the potential for a peaceful 
resolution to this enduring conflict, which I hope to see in my 
lifetime.

                          ____________________
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RUSSELL A. ROGERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1299

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 13, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, 

Judge.

Russell A. Rogers, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999); Dale v. State, 

703 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1997); Franke v. State, 997 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); 

Pratte v. State, 946 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 1 of 2

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 145 

July 12, 1990 

Robert Herron

Division of Mined Land Reclamation 

Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy

P.O. Drawer U

Big Stone Gap, 24219 

TOPICS: STATUS OF REMINING BILLS

INQUIRY: What is the status of the remining bill introduced by Representative Rahall at the 

beginning of this year? Is there any information available on two earlier versions of remining 

bills introduced by Representatives Clinger and Boucher? 

SEARCH RESULTS: Research was conducted using the bill tracking materials available in 

LEXIS. A summary of actions on the bills follows. Copies of the "Bill Tracking Reports" and 

both versions of the Rahall bill are attached. 

SUMMARY OF ACTIONS

1. Earlier bills. 

In June, 1989 (101st Cong, 1st Sess), two bills were introduced and referred to the House Interior 

and Insular Affairs Committee. The purpose of the bills was "to encourage the remining and 

reclamation of abandoned mined lands by active mining operations." 

HR 2719 was introduced by William F. Clinger (R-PA).

HR 2791 was introduced by Rick Boucher (D-VA).

The House Subcommittee on Mining and Natural Resources held a hearing on both bills in July, 

1989. 

2. Coalfield Environment Enhancement Act of 1990. 

The result of the hearing and "subsequent work on this matter" was the introduction of HR 4053 

in February, 1990 (101st Cong, 2nd Sess). Introduced by Nick J. Rahall (D-VW), the bill is 

cosponsored by the following Representatives: 

Boucher (D-VA)

Clinger (R-PA)

Murphy (D-PA)
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall

Page 2 of 2

McCloskey (D-IN)

Udall (D-AZ)

The House Subcommittee on Mining and Natural Resources held a hearing on the bill on March 

13, 1990. On April 26, 1990, the Subcommittee approved an amended version of the bill for full 

Committee action. The House Interior and Insular Affairs Committee voted unanimously for the 

amended bill on May 16, 1990. 

On June 6, 1990, HR 4053, with an amendment, was reported in the House (H Rept 101-527). 

ATTACHMENTS

A. Bill Tracking Report for HR 4053, 101st Cong, 2nd Sess. 

B. Bill Tracking Report for HR 2719, 101st Cong, 1st Sess. 

C. Bill Tracking Report for HR 2791, 101st Cong, 1st Sess. 

D. HR 4053, Version 2, 101st Cong, 2nd Sess (June 8, 1990). 

E. HR 4053, Version 1, 101st Cong, 1st Sess (February 21, 1990) (with Extension of 

Remarks by Rep. Rahall). 

Update of COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 145 

Status of the remining bill

November 29, 1990 

Updated activity on H.R. 4053 - Coalfield Environment Enhancement Act of 1990: 

7/10/90 House agreed to suspend the rules and pass, amended, by voice vote

7/11/90 House requested the concurrence of the Senate

7/11/90 Referred to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

The following materials are attached: 

The updated Bill Tracking Report 

Copy of the bill as referred in the Senate (Version 5) 

Copy of the bill as engrossed in the House (Version 3)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent the use of our reports dated March 13, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (“Oncolytics”) as at December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Oncolytics as of December 31, 2014, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”).


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-197633) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-171625) of our reports dated March 13, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oncolytics as at December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Oncolytics as of December 31, 2014, included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Oncolytics for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC.





Calgary, CanadaMarch 19, 2015Chartered Accountants
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H182]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1830
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Larsen of Washington) at 6 o'clock and 30 
minutes p.m.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H299]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  (Mr. CUMMINGS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
M. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  June 26, 2003                By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Parker
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Jeffrey M. Parker
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and
will be retained by Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 23, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132865 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132865 

 COA: 273652 

Shiawassee CC: 05-003367-FH 

JEFFERY KEITH SNYDER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Shiawassee County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after 

the date of this order. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

p0516 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 23, 2007 

 Clerk
OSTI.GOV
All News Articles *(filtered)*
*2022 OSTP Public Access Memo Release*

# 2022 OSTP Public Access Memo Release

Filter for News

                                            - Share on Facebook
                                            - Share on Twitter
                                            - Send a Link via E-mail
                                            - Print
                                            - More share options ... -  LinkedIn
-  Pinterest
-  Tumblr

On August 25th, 2022, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released a memo titled *Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research*. This 2022 memo builds upon the solid foundation of the 2013 OSTP memo - *Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research* - and was developed through many years of feedback from the public, federal agencies, researchers, libraries, publishers, and scholarly societies. The 2013 memo was a transformative policy that catalyzed a strong open science movement across the US by requiring federal agencies with research and development expenditures exceeding $100M to develop public access plans. The DOE Public Access Plan (link is external), published in 2014 in response to the OSTP memo, made DOE-funded journal articles freely available within 12 months of publication and ensured effective data management through the development of data management plans.

With the release of the 2022 memo, OSTP is updating public access policy guidance for federal agencies to ensure equitable delivery of federally funded research to the public, free of charge, and without delay. The new guidance moves from a 12-month embargo to immediate, free access to publications; ensures that publications are machine readable; provides immediate access to data underlying publications; and empowers adoption of persistent identifiers for researchers, awards, organizations, and research outputs. The new memo asks agencies that have an existing public access plan to develop or update their plans within 180 days from August 25th, 2022.

DOE is in the process of analyzing the memo's requirements and developing proposed implementation steps for inclusion in our new public access plan. Further updates will be provided by DOE through various communication channels, including to those facilities and researchers who are DOE-funded, once a new DOE Public Access Plan is completed and approved. If you have any questions, please contact us at comments@osti.gov.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7696

CHARLES C. RAMSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CA-02-664-7)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles C. Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Walter Kilgore, Attorney

General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles C. Ramsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the

petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ramsey has not made the requisite showing.

See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL 431659 (U.S. Feb.

25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

__________________________________________

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :

:

Complainant, :

:

v. : OSHRC Docket No. 09-1048

:

BRAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC, :

:

Respondent. :

__________________________________________:

BRIEFING NOTICE

The parties are requested to brief all issues presented in the Respondent’s Petition for 

Discretionary Review.1 All briefs are to be filed in accordance with Commission Rule 93.2 The 

first brief is to be filed within 40 days of this notice. A party who does not intend to file a brief 

must notify the Commission in writing setting forth the reason therefor within the applicable 

time for filing briefs, and shall serve a copy on all other parties. The time for filing briefs (or 

similar notices of intent) of opposing parties shall commence on the date of service.

BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMISSION

Dated: September 7, 2010 /s/

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

 

1

The parties are advised that when the merits or characterization of an item are before the 

Commission for review, the appropriateness of the penalty is also subject to review. 

Accordingly, the parties may address the amount of the penalty if they so choose.

2

The Commission requests that all briefs include an alphabetical table of authorities with 

references to the pages on which they are cited, and that an asterisk be placed in the left-hand 

margin of the table to indicate those authorities on which the brief principally relies. The 

Commission also requests that copies of cited authority, other than statutes, case law, law journal 

articles and legal treatises, be provided to the Commission and to the opposing party. Parties 

should be cautioned that these materials will be considered only if appropriate.
09-1048

NOTICE IS GIVEN TO THE FOLLOWING:

Charles F. James, Counsel for Appellate Litigation

Heather R. Phillips, Counsel for Appellate Litigation

Office of the Solicitor, U.S. DOL

Room S4004

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

J. Albert Kroemer, Esq. 

Cantey Hanger LLP

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 3330

Dallas, TX 75201-3100
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    The Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 19, 2010
    /s/ Paul McBarronPaul McBarronChief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President, Finance