alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 1 of 4

COALEX STATE COMPARISON REPORT - 247

March 1993

Shari Zook

Ohio Department of Natural Resources

Division of Reclamation

1855 Fountain Square Court, Building H

Columbus, Ohio 43224

TOPIC: COAL SEVERANCE TAX (Includes Report No. 59) 

INQUIRY: Please locate states with coal severance taxes. 

SEARCH RESULTS: Using LEXIS, the following states' codes were researched for 

sections pertaining severance taxes on mining, in general, or specifically, coal: 

Alabama, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky (Codes and Statutes), Maryland, 

Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. Sections on severance 

taxes were retrieved for these states: Alabama, Colorado, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio,

Virginia and West Virginia. Copies of all relevant sections are attached. 

ATTACHMENTS

A. Alabama: Code of Alabama (1992). Sections: 

1. 40-13-1 

2. 40-13-2 

3. 40-13-3 

4. 40-13-4 

5. 40-13-5 

6. 40-13-6 

7. 40-13-7 

8. 40-13-8 

9. 40-13-9 

10.40-13-10 

B. Colorado: Colorado Revised Statutes (1992). Sections: 

1. 39-29-106 

2. 39-29-108 

3. 39-29-110 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 2 of 4

C. Kentucky: 

a. Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated (Michie 1992). Sections: 

1. 42.470 

2. 42.4582 

3. 51 

4. 61.878 

5. 65.710 

6. 143.020 

7. 143.023 

8. 143.100 

b. Baldwin's Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated (1992). Sections: 

1. 42.455 

2. 42.470 

3. 42.4582 

4. 42.4585 

5. 67.083 

6. 131.190 

7. 135.050 

8. 143.010 

9. 143.020 

10.143.023 

11.143.030 

12.143.035 

13.143.090 

14.143.100 

15.143A.010 

16.143A.020 

17.143A.040 

18.143A.060 

Maryland: Annotated Code of Maryland (1992). Section 7-504 

Ohio: Baldwin's Ohio Revised Code Annotated (1992). Sections: 

0. 1514.11 

1. 5749.01 

2. 5749.02 

3. 5749.03 

4. 5749.04 

5. 5749.06 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 3 of 4

6. 5749.07 

7. 5749.08 

8. 5749.09 

9. 5749.10 

10.5749.11 

11.5749.12 

12.5749.13 

13.5749.15 

14.5749.99

Virginia: Code of Virginia (1992). Sections: 

0. 45.1-21 

1. 45.1-179.7 

2. 45.1-361.38 

3. 58.1-3286 

4. 58.1-3712 

5. 58.1-3713.2 

6. 58.1-3713.3 

West Virginia: West Virginia Code Annotated (1992). Sections: 

0. 11-12B-1 

1. 11-12B-2 

2. 11-12B-3 

3. 11-12B-4 

4. 11-12B-5 

5. 11-12B-6 

6. 11-12B-7 

7. 11-12B-8 

8. 11-12B-9 

9. 11-12B-10 

10.11-12B-11 

11.11-12B-12 

12.11-12B-13 

13.11-12B-14 

14.11-12B-15 

15.11-12B-16 

16.11-12B-17 

17.11-12B-18 

18.11-13A-2 

19.11-13A-3 

20.11-13A-4 
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of the Interior

Search conducted by: Joyce Zweben Scall Page 4 of 4

21.11-13A-6 

22.11-13A-10a 

23.11-13A-23 

24.11-13C-14 

25.11-24-9a 

26.22-1-18 

COALEX STATE INQUIRY REPORT - 59, "Coal severance tax" (1985).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S628]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 23. Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) 
     proposed an amendment to the bill S. 22, to designate certain 
     land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation 
     System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the 
     Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture, 
     and for other purposes.
       SA 24. Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) 
     proposed an amendment to the bill S. 22, supra.
       SA 25. Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. Martinez, Mr. 
     Grassley, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Enzi, 
     Mr. Thune, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Burr, and Mr. Corker) proposed 
     an amendment to the bill S. 181, to amend title VII of the 
     Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in 
     Employment Act of 1967, and to modify the operation of the 
     Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the 
     Rehabilitation Act of 1973, to clarify that a discriminatory 
     compensation decision or other practice that is unlawful 
     under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid 
     pursuant to the discriminatory compensation decision or other 
     practice, and for other purposes.
       SA 26. Mr. SPECTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 181, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 27. Mr. SPECTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 181, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to theincorporation of our report dated June 11, 2008 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of American Science and Engineering, Inc. for theyear ended March 31, 2008 included in this form 10-K into the Company’spreviously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-05797,  333-13259, 333-27929, 333-69717, 333-91801,333-53842, 333-102338, 333-117843, 333-117844, and 333-129851) and Form S-3(Nos. 033-61903, 333-09151 and 333-89836).

 

 
| /s/  Vitale, Caturano, and Company, Ltd. |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Boston,  MA                              |   |
| June 11,  2008                      |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H373-H374]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman) is recognized for 5 minutes.

[[Page H374]]

  (Mr. SHERMAN addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.)

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 74 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 74

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2017

Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Ryan of 
Ohio, Mr. Takano, Ms. Norton, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Cummings, Mr. 
   Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Ms. Moore, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. 
 Garamendi, Mr. Lowenthal, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
    Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Norcross, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
 Blumenauer, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Veasey, Mr. 
 Conyers, Mr. Grijalva, and Ms. Roybal-Allard) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated October 16, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2039 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-239867) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 16, 2020
### Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. FAA

# 7.0 J<;" 

# -c 

# e -oo3 -lJ-0 Directorate Identifier: -AD lfyou make changes to the values iu the table he/ow. you must ensure tile totals update accordingly. ({ 

### they do not , 

### click (or Tub; into u11d then out of the clumged

### cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per 

### Product (e .g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., lnspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

# u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, 

### (@$85/h parts) 

### Registered and close-up) our) 

### Products 

### Control Column Pivot Bearing 2.0 ' ...<It I 

### $0 • I l ' 

### 360 

### Torque Check Control Column Pivot Bearing 8.0 ':> 

### 'J" i' 

### $ 300

- OS( II) 

### 360 \ 

### " Replacement New Control Column Pivot Bearing Replacement, New 

# -. Design 20.0 $2,450 l I ,( 

### 360 

### (Terminating Action for Repetitive Replacement) Replace Elevator 4.0 "' ,.:!.

**-~** i 

### $10 

### Rod End Bolt 

### ' ' 

### ' ' 

### 360 

## . '

! (: .\ l•

**~-** 1,1 ·' l ' .,, '

**,l) ~**  . \1 

## ,, .,, I "- O t: 

## ·. ' 

# ,, I

**~** t

**~** ' ' 

# " (l i l 

## -. II { I ' ' • .fll . 

## ., I .. •, 0,1\ 

# . il • 

### : I I !) ( )", ' 

### • .1"• ) 

# ' '), 

### I I 

# " I: 0 \ ' \ "II(!
. ('' II I ,. ., ii .\ll' : , 11 .fJU , '' llf I I \ ( (if

**~** 1\(J(I ·, 1 n, I I
..... f} \( \ ll.Ctl1 

### ' i " I

**~...** !l.ll! { I (I(J ' ', (I• i!

**~** •; 1lP I

**·~** . ) 0· ' 0(• 

## s l' .l

_ '''

**~;** I) fi ll I 

### The known number ofproducts in 

### compliance: Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S. fleet: $2,034 ,000 

### Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

## 9On-Condition Costs:



# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

### • { . :1 r \ ! i. I 

### ' ·• ' II I

**~** I ' ' i 0:, I I " /,,qp ' n 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significan t regulatory action"?



# ~ YES* 

# 0 N0[8] *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

- YES* 

# D NO [8] *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No



# answer.

**·** YESO N0[8] Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation?



# ~ YES* 

# 0 N0[8] *Explanation:



### 10
## Summary Statement

In summary, Phantom 3 seeks an exemption from the FARs set forth above and in Appendix A to allow commercial operations of a small unmanned vehicle conducting aerial video/photographs of residential property. Approval of the exemption allowing commercial operations of the DJI Phantom 3for aerial video/photographs will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional aerial video/photography operations, using conventional aircraft, present risks associated with vehicles that weigh several thousand pounds, carry large quantities of fuel and passengers. Such aircraft must fly to and from the work location. In contrast, a DJI Phantom 3 , weighing less than 3lbs and powered by ba tteries, eliminates a portion of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The Phantom 3is carried to the survey location, not fl own there. The Phantom 3 will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose any individuals to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. Additionally, no national security issue is raised by the grant of the requested exemptions. Given the size, load carrying capacity, speed at which it operates, and the fact that it carries no explosives or other dangerous materials, the Phantom 3 poses no threat to national security. The operation of the Phantom 3 , weighing less than 3lbs, for aerial video/photography in accordance with the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting Carroll Engineers PLLC from the requirements of Part 21

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 21, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 726 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 92204)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-408, K2025-406.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-27204 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 6 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S304]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

REPORT RELATIVE TO THE EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008--PM 
                                   2

  The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message 
from the President of the United States, together with an accompanying 
report; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs:

To the Congress of the United States:
  Consistent with section 115(a)(3) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-343) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
transmit a report detailing the plan of the Secretary of the Treasury 
to exercise the authority under the Act.
                                                      George W. Bush.  
The White House, January 12, 2009.

                          ____________________
```
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

TRACY NIXON, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 2183

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:19

- cv

- 00287

- JRG

- RSP, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

Tracy Nixon appeals from the district court’s dismissal
of his complaint and moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In a prior attempt to appeal from this suit , we explained that M r . Nixon’s complaint fail ed “ to present a

non

- frivolous claim arising under the patent laws ” and that
his case was “ outside of our limited jurisdictio n.” Nixon v. Gen. Motors Corp. , No. 2021

- 1120, slip. op. at 2 (Fed. Cir. Case: 22-2183 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2022NIXON v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 2

Jan. 21, 2021) ( citation and internal quot ation marks omitted ). Nothing has changed that would warrant a different
conclusion here. We therefore transfer this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to the appropriate regional circuit,
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, this appeal and all transmittals are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

October 19

, 2022
Date F OR THE C OURT

s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-2183 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2022
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 29, 2010
    /s/ Spiro RombotisSpiro RombotisPresident & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21

                Subsidiaries of Wireless Age Communications, Inc.

Prime Wireless Corporation is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary does
business under its own name.

Marlon Distributors Ltd. is a company incorporated under the Canada Business
Corporations Act. The subsidiary does business under its own name.

Prime Battery Products Limited is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary does
business under its own name.

Wireless Source Distribution Ltd. is a Saskatchewan corporation. The subsidiary
does business under its own name.

Wireless Age Communications Ltd. (94% owned by Wireless Age Communications,
Inc.) is a Saskatchewan corporation. The subsidiary does business under its own
name.

DB Sim Holdings Ltd. is a Saskatchewan corporation and is an inactive subsidiary
of the Company.

1588102 Ontario Inc. is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary is a special
purpose administrative subsidiary and conducts no operating businesses.

mmwave Technologies Inc. is an Ontario corporation. The subsidiary company does
business under its own name.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1430
          FEDERAL TAX CREDITS FOR STUDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES

  (Mr. DOGGETT asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. DOGGETT. Madam Speaker, since the broad outlines of economic 
recovery legislation were first announced, Representative Tom Perriello 
and I have been working with our colleagues to see that that 
legislation was strengthened to include additional assistance for 
students and their families, students who deserve all the education 
that they are willing to work for.
  Today we are pleased to announce success. The legislation that will 
be filed to improve and strengthen our economy at this time of economic 
downturn will include about $12.5 billion in new federal assistance 
over the next 2 years in the form of federal tax credits. These tax 
credits will be expanded to include textbooks and course materials. 
They will help now so that every family that is spending a dollar on 
higher education this year will know they will get that dollar back, up 
to $2,500 next year when they pay their tax return.
  For the first time in history, this will be a refundable credit, as 
we proposed it, so that families making less than $40,000 a year, who 
did not qualify for the full credit in the past, will now be entitled 
to get up to $1,000 of their expenses. At a time of economic downturn, 
this is the time to support our students and their families. Help them 
and help rebuild our economy.

                          ____________________
```
Order entered October 17 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00226

- CR

MATTHEW JOSEPH ALLEN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 80447

- 2016



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 16, 2017 second motion to extend time to file a

brief. We GRANT the motion. Appellant’s brief shall be filed by October 31, 2017. We caution

appellant that further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27174]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 708 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-386, K2025-384.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27174 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```