Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2024 / Notices 92721 

4The Commission subsequently revised its 

schedule in a notice published in the Federal 

Register on August 16, 2024 (89 FR 66738). 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective October 4, 2023, 

following receipt of petitions filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by the 

U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition 

(consisting of Alexandria Extrusion 

Company, Alexandria, Minnesota; APEL 

Extrusions Inc., Coburg, Oregon; 

Bonnell Aluminum, Newnan, Georgia; 

Brazeway, Adrian, Michigan; Custom 

Aluminum Products, South Elgin, 

Illinois; Extrudex Aluminum, North 

Jackson, Ohio; International Extrusions, 

Garden City, Michigan; Jordan 

Aluminum Company, Memphis, 

Tennessee; M–D Building Products, 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Merit 

Aluminum, Corona, California; MI 

Metals, Oldsmar, Florida; Pennex 

Aluminum, Wellsville, Pennsylvania; 

Tower Extrusions, Olney, Texas; and 

Western Extrusions, Carrollton, Texas) 

and the United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union, 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The final 

phase of the investigations was 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of aluminum extrusions from 

China, Indonesia, Mexico, and Turkey 

were subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)) and that imports of aluminum 

extrusions from China, Colombia, 

Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, 

Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, 

Thailand, Turkey, United Arab 

Emirates, and Vietnam were sold at 

LTFV within the meaning of 733(b) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of 

the scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on May 23, 2024 (89 FR 

45677).4 The Commission conducted its 

hearing on October 1, 2024. All persons 

who requested the opportunity were 

permitted to participate. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) 

and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these investigations on November 18, 

2024. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5560 

(November 2024), entitled Aluminum 

Extrusions from China, Colombia, 

Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, 

Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, 

Thailand, Turkey, United Arab 

Emirates, and Vietnam: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–695–698 and 731–TA– 

1643–1644 and 1646–1657 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 18, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–27376 Filed 11–21–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1351 (Remand)] 

Certain Active Matrix Organic LightEmitting Diode Display Panels and 

Modules for Mobile Devices, and 

Components Thereof; Notice of 

Request for Submissions on the Public 

Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on 

November 15, 2024, the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued 

an Initial Determination on Violation of 

Section 337. The ALJ also issued a 

Recommended Determination on 

remedy and bonding should a violation 

be found in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission is 

soliciting submissions on public interest 

issues raised by the recommended relief 

should the Commission find a violation. 

This notice is soliciting comments from 

the public and interested government 

agencies only. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides 

that, if the Commission finds a 

violation, it shall exclude the articles 

concerned from the United States 

unless, after considering the effect of 

such exclusion upon the public health 

and welfare, competitive conditions in 

the United States economy, the 

production of like or directly 

competitive articles in the United 

States, and United States consumers, it 

finds that such articles should not be 

excluded from entry. (19 U.S.C. 

1337(d)(1)). A similar provision applies 

to cease and desist orders. (19 U.S.C. 

1337(f)(1)). 

The Commission is soliciting 

submissions on public interest issues 

raised by the recommended relief 

should the Commission find a violation, 

specifically: a limited exclusion order 

directed to certain active matrix organic 

light-emitting diode display panels and 

modules for mobile devices, and 

components thereof imported, sold for 

importation, and/or sold after 

importation by respondents Injured 

Gadgets, LLC; Wholesale Gadget Parts, 

Inc.; Phone LCD Parts LLC; Parts4LCD; 

Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics 

Technology Co., Ltd.; Captain Mobile 

Parts, Inc.; Group Vertical, LLC; 

Sourcely Plus, LLC; Mengtor Inc.; 

Electronics Universe, Inc, d/b/a 

Fixez.com and Repairs Universe, Inc.; 

LCTech International Inc. d/b/a/ 

SEGMobile.com; Parts4Cells Inc.; DFW 

Imports LLC d/b/a DFW Cellphone and 

Parts; Gadgetfix Corp.; and eTech Parts 

Plus LLC; and cease and desist orders 

directed to those same respondents 

except Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics 

Technology Co., Ltd. Parties are to file 

public interest submissions pursuant to 

19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). 

The Commission is interested in 

further development of the record on 

the public interest in this investigation. 

Accordingly, members of the public and 

interested government agencies are 

invited to file submissions of no more 

than five (5) pages, inclusive of 

attachments, concerning the public 

interest in light of the ALJ’s 

Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding issued in this 

investigation on November 15, 2024. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of the recommended remedial 

orders in this investigation, should the 

Commission find a violation, would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
92722 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2024 / Notices 

(i) explain how the articles potentially 

subject to the recommended remedial 

orders are used in the United States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the recommended orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or thirdparty suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the recommended 

orders within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the recommended 

orders would impact consumers in the 

United States. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business on 

December 18, 2024. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above. The Commission’s paper 

filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) 

are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 

(March 19, 2020). Submissions should 

refer to the investigation number (‘‘Inv. 

No. 337–TA–1351 Remand’’) in a 

prominent place on the cover page and/ 

or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, https://

www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_

notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_

filing.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment by marking each document 

with a header indicating that the 

document contains confidential 

information. This marking will be 

deemed to satisfy the request procedure 

set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which 

confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. Any non-party 

wishing to submit comments containing 

confidential information must serve 

those comments on the parties to the 

investigation pursuant to the applicable 

Administrative Protective Order. A 

redacted non-confidential version of the 

document must also be filed 

simultaneously with any confidential 

filing and must be served in accordance 

with Commission Rule 210.4(f)(7)(ii)(A) 

(19 CFR 210.4(f)(7)(ii)(A)). All 

information, including confidential 

business information and documents for 

which confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) by the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

Government employees and contract 

personnel, solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and in part 210 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

part 210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 18, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–27360 Filed 11–21–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1232 

(Enforcement)] 

Certain Chocolate Milk Powder and 

Packaging Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Finding 

Enforcement Respondents To Have 

Violated the GEO; Issuance of Cease 

and Desist Orders; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to find Bharat Bazar Inc. 

(‘‘Bharat Bazaar’’); Coconut Hill Inc. d/ 

b/a Coconut Hill (‘‘Coconut Hill’’); 

Organic Ingredients Inc. d/b/a Namaste 

Plaza Indian Super Market (‘‘Organic 

Ingredients’’); and New India Bazar Inc. 

d/b/a New India Bazar (‘‘New India’’) 

(collectively, ‘‘Enforcement 

Respondents’’) to have violated the 

General Exclusion Order (‘‘GEO’’) in 

this investigation. The Commission has 

also determined to issue cease and 

desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’) against each of 

these four defaulting Enforcement 

Respondents. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Lall, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2043. Copies of 

non-confidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, 

please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at https://

www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted the original 

investigation on December 1, 2020, 

based on a complaint filed on behalf of 

Meenaxi Enterprise Inc. (‘‘Meenaxi’’) of 

Edison, New Jersey. 85 FR 77237–38 

(Dec. 1, 2020). The complaint alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain chocolate milk 

powder and packaging thereof by reason 

of infringement of U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 4,206,026 (‘‘the ’026 

mark’’). The Commission’s notice of 

investigation named several 

respondents, including but not limited 

to Bharat Bazar of Union City, 

California; Coconut Hill of Sunnyvale, 

California; Organic Food Inc. d/b/a 

Namaste Plaza Indian Super Market 

(‘‘Organic Food’’) of Fremont, 

California; and New India of San Jose, 

California. Id. at 77237. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) 

was also a party to the investigation. Id. 

In the underlying investigation, all 

respondents were found in default. See 

Order No. 6 (Feb. 10, 2021), unreviewed 

by Comm’n Notice (Mar. 2, 2021); Order 

No. 23 (May 19, 2022), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Jun. 14, 2022). On May 

24, 2021, Meenaxi moved for summary 

determination of violation of section 

337 by the respondents found in default 

by Order No. 6 and requested a GEO. On 

December 1, 2021, the former chief 

administrative law judge (‘‘former 

CALJ’’) granted the motion as an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 15), but 

noted discrepancies with respect to 

respondent Organic Food, calling into 

question whether that respondent was 

ever properly served with the complaint 

and notice of investigation and with the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1