alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U n i ted S tates C o u rt o f A p p ea ls

F o r th e S e v e n th C ir c u it C hi ca go, I l l i noi s 606 04 Dec em ber7, 2004 Befor e Ho n. R IC HARD A . PO SNE R, Cir c uitJu d ge Ho n. KE NNET H F. R IPPLE , Cir c uitJu d ge Ho n. ILA NA DIAM OND RO VNE R, Cir c uitJu d ge

No. 04- 1042 SALTON, INC OR PORAT ED ,

Pla inti ff- App ell ee, v. PHILI PS DOMESTIC APPLI ANCES AND PE RS ONAL C AR E B. V. ,

Def en d ant -Ap p ellan t, v. ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS LIM ITE D, Intervenor-Ap pellee.

_______________ No. 04- 1359 PHILI PS DOMESTIC APPLI ANCES AND PE RS ONAL C AR E B. V. ,

Plain tif f- Ap p ellan t, v. SALTON, INC OR PORAT ED ,

Defendant-Ap pellee, and. ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS LIM ITE D, Intervenor-Ap pellee. App eal s f rom the Uni ted States District Court for the Northern District of Illi nois, Eastern Divisi on. Nos . 03 C 5660 & 04 C 0058 JoanH um p hr ey Lef

ko w, Jud ge .Nos . 04- 1042, 04- 1359 & 04- 2994

_______________ No. 04- 2994 SALTON, INC OR PORAT ED , Pla inti ff, v. PHILI PS DOMESTIC APPLI ANCES AND PE RS ONAL C AR E B. V. ,

Defendant-Ap pellee, v. ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS LIM ITE D, Int erven or -Ap p ellan t. Pag e 2

O R D E R The opinion of this c ourt issu ed on December 7, 200 4, is amended as f oll ows: Onp age 8, lin e 8 , t he wo r d“o n” s ho uldbe in se r te ds o t hat th e s en te nc e w ill r ead : The r ule lis ts s eve r al f ac to r s as bear ing on“e quit y an dgo odc on sc ien c e.”
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


October 14, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2038


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2038 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-240140 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1195 

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to permit striped bass fishing in 

the Exclusive Economic Zone transit zone between Montauk, New York, 

and Point Judith, Rhode Island, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. ZELDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to permit striped 

bass fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone transit zone 

between Montauk, New York, and Point Judith, Rhode 

Island, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Fishing Access 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FISHING IN BLOCK ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce, in 

8 consultation with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1195 IH

1 Commission, may issue regulations to permit and regulate 

2 Atlantic striped bass fishing in the Block Island Sound 

3 Transit Zone. 

4 (b) BLOCK ISLAND SOUND TRANSIT ZONE DE5 FINED.—In this section the term ‘‘Block Island Sound 

6 transit zone’’ means the area of the exclusive economic 

7 zone north of a line connecting Montauk Light, Montauk 

8 Point, New York, and Block Island Southeast Light, 

9 Block Island, Rhode Island; and west of a line connecting 

10 Point Judith Light, Point Judith, Rhode Island, and 

11 Block Island Southeast Light, Block Island, Rhode Island. 

12 (c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this section or the 

13 regulations issued under this section shall affect— 

14 (1) any permit that— 

15 (A) is issued under any other provision of 

16 law by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

17 Administration, including a permit issued be18 fore the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

19 (B) authorizes fishing in the Block Island 

20 Sound Transit Zone; or 

21 (2) any activity authorized by such a permit. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 115 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 

aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on the status of the victim. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 115 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thin Blue Line Act’’. 

3 SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY. 

4 Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by inserting after paragraph (16) the following: 

6 ‘‘(17) KILLING OR TARGETING OF LAW EN7 FORCEMENT OFFICER.— 

8 ‘‘(A) The defendant killed or attempted to 

9 kill, in the circumstance described in subpara10 graph (B), a person who is authorized by law— 

11 ‘‘(i) to engage in or supervise the pre12 vention, detention, investigation, or pros13 ecution, or the incarceration of any person 

14 for any criminal violation of law; 

15 ‘‘(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or pros16 ecute an individual for any criminal viola17 tion of law; or 

18 ‘‘(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 

19 responder. 

20 ‘‘(B) The circumstance referred to in sub21 paragraph (A) is that the person was killed or 

22 targeted— 

23 ‘‘(i) while he or she was engaged in 

24 the performance of his or her official du25 ties; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 115 RFS

1 ‘‘(ii) because of the performance of his 

2 or her official duties; or 

3 ‘‘(iii) because of his or her status as 

4 a public official or employee.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
On petitioner’s petition for attorney fees filed January 11 and on respondents’ response to petitioner’s petition for attorney fees filed January 24,

petition for attorney fee denied August 10, 1983

#### GATES, *Petitioner, v.*EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, *Respondents.*

(82-AB-628; CA A24861)

668 P2d 432

Elizabeth A. Trainor, Portland, for petition.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, contra.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*336PER CURIAM

Petitioner, the prevailing party in *Gates v. Employment Division,*61 Or App 136, 655 P2d 226 (1982), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to ORS 183.495 and 183.497 of the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA). No award under either statute is appropriate. The Employment Division did not appear in the proceeding before the Employment Appeals Board (EAB), issue the order in question or appear in opposition to petitioner in this court. *Johnson v. Employment Division,*64 Or App 276, 668 P2d 416 (1983). EAB acted in this case only in a quasi-judicial capacity; no award is appropriate against it. *Wasco County v. AFSCME,*31 Or App 765, 767, 571 P2d 549 (1977); *Van Gordon v. Ore. State Bd. of Dental Examiners,*63 Or App 561, 666 P2d 276 (1983); *Johnson v. Employment Division, supra.*

Petition for attorney fee award denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,447
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             675
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,122
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,850
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,409
<LOANS>                                        714,321
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 804,269
<DEPOSITS>                                     558,582
<SHORT-TERM>                                    43,265
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,684
<LONG-TERM>                                    108,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,135
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 804,269
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  866
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,446
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,843
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,603
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      102
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,779
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,779
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.98
<LOANS-NON>                                        739
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,657
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       33
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,734
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,734
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED

May 14, 2020

v No. 334806

Macomb Circuit Court

DIONTE DESH AU N CLINGMAN, LC No. 2016

- 000099

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

ON REMAND

Before: B OONSTRA

, P .J., and B ECKERING and R ONAYNE K RAUSE , JJ.

B OONSTRA

, J . ( concurring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Mark T. Boonstra
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 21, 2016

s0914

Order 

Clerk

September 21, 2016

152688

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152688

COA: 321570

Wayne CC: 13-000751-FC

GIANDRE ROOSEVELT BURNS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                   |

| Date:  November 2,                2007 | /s/                William J. Fehrman    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  | William                J. Fehrman        |   |
|                                                  | President                                |   |
|                                                  | (chief                executive officer) |   |

----

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27202]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 14, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 461 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-394, K2025-392.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27202 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1219 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1219

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to expand the investor 
limitation for qualifying venture capital funds under an exemption from 
                the definition of an investment company.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting America's Innovators Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. INVESTOR LIMITATION FOR QUALIFYING VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDS.

    Section 3(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a-3(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting 
        ``(or, in the case of a qualifying venture capital fund, 250 
        persons)'' after ``one hundred persons''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C)(i) The term `qualifying venture capital fund' 
                means a venture capital fund that has not more than 
                $10,000,000 in aggregate capital contributions and 
                uncalled committed capital, with such dollar amount to 
                be indexed for inflation once every 5 years by the 
                Commission, beginning from a measurement made by the 
                Commission on a date selected by the Commission, 
                rounded to the nearest $1,000,000.
                    ``(ii) The term `venture capital fund' has the 
                meaning given the term in section 275.203(l)-1 of title 
                17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor 
                regulation.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1219

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to expand the investor 
limitation for qualifying venture capital funds under an exemption from 
                the definition of an investment company.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Gillard, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 544]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.), rendered September 22, 1992, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and menacing, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By a decision and order of this Court dated January 30, 1995, the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on whether the defendant was present at a *Sandoval*hearing conducted on June 12, 1992, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim *(see, People v Gillard,*211 AD2d 814). The Supreme Court has now filed its report.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the defendant’s absence from certain off-the-record bench conferences did not deprive him of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the *Sandoval*hearing *(see, People v Yhel,*215 AD2d 793; *People v Whethers,*212 AD2d 820).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00369
- CV

__________________
IN THE INTEREST OF L.R.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F
- 235,984

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On Septemb er 7, 2021, the trial court signed orders granting a nonsuit to
In t ervenor s C.J.M. and I. A .C. (“ a ppellants”) and terminating the parental rights of K.O. and J.R. to their child, L.R. On November 17, 2021, t he trial court denied

appellants ’ motion for new trial, and they filed a notice of appeal on that same date

. We questioned our jurisdiction and appellants filed a re sponse
. An appeal is accelerated in a case where the trial court order ed termination of parental rights

. See Tex. Fam. Cod e Ann. § § 109.002, 263.405(a) ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 2 8

. 4

. Accordingly, a notice of appeal is due twenty days after the trial court2 signs the final judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(b). An extension of time to file a notice of appeal may be gr anted if the notice of appeal is filed within fifteen days of the due date ; however, the filing of a post

- judgment motion does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, 28.1(b). Appellant s have not shown that they filed a notice of appeal within the time authorized for perfecting an accelerated appeal or for requesting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 26.3

. Therefore, w e dismiss the appeal for lac k of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 29, 2021 Opinion Delivered December 30, 2021 Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERTO A. GUTIERREZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00116-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D04381)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until May 17, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Gandara, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 17, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. ("TWE") of our reports
dated January 29, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of TWE and Warner Communications Inc. and the consolidated
financial statements of American Television and Communications Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 2002 included in TWE's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:

                  1) No. 333-69221
                  2) No. 333-70015
                  3) No. 333-67694

New York, New York
March 27, 2003