alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2 9 , 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00845- CR

BRANDON JAY FAUNCE, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1501146

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement with the State, appellant pleaded guilty to sexual assault and was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He filed a notice of appeal from his conviction, and we dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Faunce v. State , No. 14- 18 -00093-CR, 2018 WL 2139199 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 10, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). In June 2018, appellant filed a document in the trial court called, “Motion for2

Judgment on the Pleadings.” The trial court denied the motion on August 16, 2018. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that denial. Generally, appeals in criminal cases may only be taken from final judgments of convictions. Workman v. State , 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 ( Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). We know of no exception to the general rule t hat allows an appeal from an order denying a post

- conviction “motion for judgment on the pleadings.” Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FAUSTO RENATO QUEVEDO, a.k.a.

Apple, a.k.a. Fausto Quevedo Guarcas,

a.k.a. Calvin Martinez, a.k.a. Raul

Martinez, a.k.a. Frausto Quevedo,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50387

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00067-GAF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Fausto Renato Quevedo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being an illegal

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-50387

alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Quevedo’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Quevedo the opportunity to file

a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
No. 82-242.

#### Gorsuch, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency *v.*Sierra Club et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 942.] Motion of respondents for leave to file motion for divided argument out of time denied.
(see attached scope of accreditation for field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)

Print Date: 04/25/2011 Page 1 of 2

This is to signify that

FORESTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.

578 SOUND AVENUE

WADING RIVER, NEW YORK 11792

Inspection Agency AA-720

Type A (Third-Party) Inspection Body

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Inspection Agencies (AC98), has demonstrated compliance with 

ISO/IEC Standard 17020, General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection, and has been 

accredited, commencing April 7, 2011, to provide inspection services in the approved scope of accreditation.

Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.

Vice President President
Forestwood Industries, Inc. AA-720

Type A (Third-Party) Inspection Body

April 7, 2011

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 04/25/2011 Page 2 of 2

Forestwood Industries, Inc. Gary Poserina

578 Sound Avenue Quality Control Manager

Wading River, NY 11792 (631) 929-3197

FIELDS OF 

INSPECTIONS

TYPE AND RANGE OF

INSPECTIONS

INSPECTION METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

Wood-based building products

- Formaldehyde emissions

In-plant California Code of Regulation, Section 93120 Title 17; 

Forestwood Industries Inc., inspection procedure SAP-01 

and Quality Program Audit Work Sheet
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Combatant Command Enlisted Leaders Discuss Operations, Noncommissioned Officers Empowerment

By Jim GaramoneDoD News, Defense Media Activity

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 185 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H10869]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           DISPENSING WITH CALENDAR WEDNESDAY BUSINESS TODAY

  Mr. LARSEN of Washington. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that 
the business in order under the Calendar Wednesday rule be dispensed 
with today.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Washington?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AdventSoftware, Inc.

 

 
|   | May 10, 2006 | /s/ Stephanie G. DiMarco              |   |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         | Stephanie G. DiMarco                  |
|   |         | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will beretained by Advent Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Feather River Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 10.9 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended October 6, 2014

Rule Title(s): Rice Straw Emission Reduction Credits and Banking

Date Submitted to ARB: October 24, 2014

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted 4/6/2009

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Timothy Mitro Phone Number: (530) 634-7659 ext 208 E-mail Address: tmitro@fraqmd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The District amended the definition of the Historic Burn Fraction (HBF) from 96% to 100%. This District always 

intended the HBF to be 100%, but the language in the original 2009 rule had this administrative oversight, and so it 

has been corrected.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission 

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: Yuba and Sutter Counties

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible):

N/A
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): E Reporting Requirements in Section(s): E
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: 

5/1/2002
CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of
Chelsea Property Group, Inc., the sole general partner of CPG Partners, L.P.
("the OP"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the OP for the period ended June 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the OP.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 4th
day of August, 2005.

| | /s/ Michael J. Clarke
        Michael J. Clarke, Executive Vice
        President and Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to CPG Partners L.P. and will be retained by CPG Partners
L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>   1
                      ADVANCED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  EXHIBIT 12 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                           1999           1998
                                                         --------       --------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>      
Consolidated pretax loss from continuing operations      $(37,474)      $(21,320)
Interest expense                                            9,958          1,649
Interest portion of rent expense                              429            474
                                                         --------       --------

     EARNINGS (LOSS)                                     $(27,087)      $(19,197)
                                                         ========       ========


Interest expense                                         $  9,958       $  1,649
Interest capitalized                                          548            680
Interest portion of rent expense                              429            474
                                                         --------       --------

     FIXED CHARGES                                       $ 10,935       $  2,803
                                                         ========       ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                           --             --
                                                         ========       ========
</TABLE>

For purposes of calculating the unaudited ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings consist of loss from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest charges and
amortization of debt issuance costs, whether expensed or capitalized, and that
portion of rental expense that is representative of interest. In the nine months
ended March 31, 1999, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charge
requirements by $38,022. In the nine months ended March 31, 1998, earnings were
inadequate to cover fixed charge requirements by $22,000.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Exercise Courageous Channel 2017

By Staff Sgt. Franklin R. Ramos51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
Exhibit 10.4


 


CORPORATE AGREEMENT
(Translated)


 


Party A: Dongguan City Zhenghao Shiye Investment Co., Ltd.


Party B: KUBE Development. Ltd.


 


Intent: Based on the taste preference of Party A, Party B has customized
a Coffee Blend formula, defined as 613 (henceforth denoted as “613”). This agreement maintains without prejudice to
the interests of either signing parties’.


 


1. Party A is willing and accepting the adoption of
613 prepared by Party B and acknowledging that Party B is the designer of 613 and the only person who owns this intellectual
property. It agrees to fulfill and guarantee the following terms:


 


a. During the cooperation period, from January 1, 2020 to
December 31, 2021, Party A


guarantees that it will continue or maintain the purchase
of coffee beans from Party B, purchase will continue within 45 days previous purchase of 613.


b. In the event that Party A fails to meet the above commitments
(a), Party B shall


withdraw the right to use 613 as violation of the commitments
of Party A.


c. Since Party B agrees to render reseller and user rights
of 613 to Party A, with the understanding that Party A guarantees to only use 613 for the manufacture of coffee products for sale
to Party A’s clients, including coffee beans and coffee powder packaging, but will never disclose to any Third Party the
composition and content of 613.


 


2. During the cooperation period, Party B will guarantee
and promise not to disclose, share


and/or sell 613’s formula and user rights to any
third party if Party A performs (1)(a) and (c).


 


3. Both parties are required to sign a written consent
60 days prior to the termination date of


this cooperation agreement to extend Party A's right to
use 613. Otherwise, Party A's right to use 613 will terminate on the termination date, and Party B will be free to sell or use
613.


 


4. This cooperation agreement is governed by and based
on the laws of the Hong Kong


Special Administrative Region.


 


5. If any party breaches the contract and the other party
has a loss, it will be compensated


according to the common law.


 





	On Behalf of KUBE Development Ltd.	 	On Behalf
of 东莞市正好实业投资有限公司
(Agility)
	 	 	 
	/s/ Winson H Wong	 	/s/ Kwok Hei Leung 
	Mr Winson H Wong, CEO	 	Mr Kwok Hei
Leung, director
	Date: January 1, 2020	 	Date: January
1, 2020



 


 


Room 1502, 15/F Beverly
House, 93~107 Lockhart Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong

TEL +852 5462 8398/ +86 147 1493 9077
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


     MATERIAL TERMS FOR PAYMENT OF ANNUAL EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

          The Company has adopted criteria for the payment of annual incentive
compensation to the Company's most highly compensated executive officers under
the Company's annual incentive plan.  The material terms for the payment of such
compensation are described below.

          Any executive officer of the Company is eligible to be selected by the
Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Compensation
Committee") for participation in the annual incentive plan. Payment of an 
annual incentive to an executive officer under the plan will be contingent
upon the attainment of one or more performance goals (which may be stated as
alternative goals) established in writing by the Compensation Committee for a
covered executive officer for each performance period, which is generally the
Company's taxable year. Performance goals will be based on one or more of the
following business criteria, which may be stated either on an absolute or
relative basis: earnings per share, total stockholder return, operating
earnings, growth in assets, return on equity, return on capital, market share,
stock price, net income, cash flow, sales growth (in general, by type of product
and by type of customer), retained earnings, completion of acquisitions,
completion of divestitures and asset sales, cost or expense reductions,

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
introduction or conversion of product brands and achievement of specified
management information systems objectives.

          The maximum annual incentive award that may be granted to any covered
executive officer based on attainment of the performance goals established by
the Compensation Committee is $2 million.

          The Compensation Committee from time to time may approve payment of
discretionary annual incentive compensation based on business criteria other
than the pre-established performance goals. 


                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000006474
<NAME> THE ANDERSONS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         4163000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 92629000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3514000
<INVENTORY>                                  269930000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             364694000
<PP&E>                                       212257000
<DEPRECIATION>                               130395000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               451415000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        306413000
<BONDS>                                       74139000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    66258000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 451415000
<SALES>                                     1092409000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1097516000
<CGS>                                        944175000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                944175000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             129202000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            14019000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               10120000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           10120000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  10120000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .165
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>