alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1163 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt certain recipients of 

Department of Agriculture conservation assistance from certain reporting 

requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire (for herself, Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mr. ABRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to exempt certain 

recipients of Department of Agriculture conservation assistance from certain reporting requirements, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

5 Farm Conservation Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1163 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN RECIPIENTS OF DEPART2 MENT OF AGRICULTURE CONSERVATION AS3 SISTANCE FROM CERTAIN REPORTING RE4 QUIREMENTS. 

5 Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

6 U.S.C. 3844) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(m) EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN REPORTING RE9 QUIREMENTS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF EXEMPTED PRODUCER.— 

11 In this subsection, the term ‘exempted producer’ 

12 means a producer or landowner eligible to partici13 pate in any conservation program administered by 

14 the Secretary. 

15 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION.—Notwithstanding the Fed16 eral Funding Accountability and Transparency Act 

17 of 2006 (Public Law 109–282; 31 U.S.C. 6101 

18 note), the requirements of parts 25 and 170 of title 

19 2, Code of Federal Regulations (and any successor 

20 regulations), shall not apply with respect to assist21 ance received by an exempted producer from the 

22 Secretary, acting through the Natural Resources 

23 Conservation Service.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
## Ray H. Darling, Jr., Executive Secretary of the Review Commission, Retires

**Ray H. Darling, Jr., Executive Secretary of the Review Commission, Retires**

**John X. Cerveny Named Acting Executive Secretary**

Ray H. Darling, Jr., Executive Secretary of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, retired effective January 2, 2014, after more than 41 years of public service. Mr. Darling had been Executive Secretary at the Review Commission for more than 36 years. John Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, has been appointed Acting Executive Secretary effective today, January 13th, 2014.

According to Review Commission Chair Thomasina Rogers, "Ray Darling has served the Commission with dedication for the last 41 years. He has been a great source of institutional knowledge and wise counsel throughout my tenure. I wish Ray the best in his well-deserved retirement."

Mr. Darling began his service at the Review Commission in 1972 as an attorney advisor to Commissioner Alan F. Burch, and he subsequently served as attorney advisor to Commissioner Timothy F. Cleary. In 1977, then Chairman Cleary appointed Mr. Darling to serve as Executive Secretary for the Commission, a position he held until his retirement. As Executive Secretary, Mr. Darling supervised the docketing of employers' contests of citations issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). He also supervised the filing of documents before the Commissioners, and advised them with respect to various issues.

Mr. Darling earned a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and a Juris Doctor from the University of Wyoming. He also earned a Master of Science in Technology of Management from The American University.

Mr. Darling is a native of Minnesota. He and his wife currently reside in Arlington, Virginia.

____

John X. Cerveny began his legal career with the Review Commission in 1987 as an attorney advisor in the Office of the General Counsel. In 2006 he became the Deputy Executive Secretary for the Commission.

Mr. Cerveny received his Bachelor's degree from Emory University and his Juris Doctor from William & Mary Law School. He is admitted to the Virginia and District of Columbia Bars and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Mr. Cerveny is originally from Baltimore, Maryland. He and his wife currently reside in Potomac, Maryland with their two children.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent
J. Santha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Brent J. SanthaName: Brent J. SanthaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                                   AT&T CORP.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,      2003     2002     2001     2000      1999
                                     ------   ------   ------   -------   -------
                                                (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S>                                  <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>
Income from continuing operations
  before income taxes                $2,690   $2,836   $7,666   $12,480   $12,545
Add distributions of less
  than 50% owned affiliates               6        1        5        11        11
Add fixed charges, excluding
  capitalized interest                1,319    1,624    1,677     1,697       958
Total earnings from continuing
  operations before income taxes     ------   ------   ------   -------   -------
  and fixed charges                  $4,015   $4,461   $9,348   $14,188   $13,514
                                     ======   ======   ======   =======   =======

Fixed Charges:
Total interest expense                1,158    1,448    1,493     1,503       774
Capitalized interest                     35       61      121       143       123
Interest portion of rental
  expense                               161      176      184       194       184
                                     ------   ------   ------   -------   -------
Total fixed charges                  $1,354   $1,685   $1,798   $ 1,840   $ 1,081
                                     ======   ======   ======   =======   =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      3.0      2.6      5.2       7.7      12.5
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covenant Transportation Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: November 9, 2010
/s/ David R. ParkerDavid R. ParkerChief Executive Officer
 
 Back to Form 10-Q
QUICK CARDTM

Electrical Safety

Electrical hazards can cause burns, 

shocks and electrocution (death).

• Assume that all overhead wires are energized at 

deadly voltages. Never assume that a wire is safe to 

touch even if it is down or appears to be insulated.

• Never touch a fallen overhead power line. 

Call the electric utility company to report fallen 

electrical lines.

• Stay at least 10 feet (3 meters) away from 

overhead wires during cleanup and other 

activities. If working at heights or handling 

long objects, survey the area before starting 

work for the presence of overhead wires.

• If an overhead wire falls across your vehicle while 

you are driving, stay inside the vehicle and 

continue to drive away from the line. If the engine 

stalls, do not leave your vehicle. Warn people not 

to touch the vehicle or the wire. Call or ask 

someone to call the local electric utility company 

and emergency services.

• Never operate electrical equipment while you are 

standing in water.

• Never repair electrical cords or equipment unless 

qualified and authorized.

• Have a qualified electrician inspect electrical 

equipment that has gotten wet before energizing it.

• If working in damp locations, inspect electric cords 

and equipment to ensure that they are in good 

condition and free of defects, and use a ground-fault 

circuit interrupter (GFCI).

• Always use caution when working near electricity.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

OSHA 4281-08 2023 | Electrical Safety (Chinese Simplified)

For more information: 

Occupational

Safety and Health

Administration
速览卡

用电安全指南

电会导致灼伤、电击甚至触电(死亡)

等危险。

• 所有架空电线都可能已通电且为致命电压。永

远不要认为电线是安全的,即使它是垂下的或

看起来是绝缘的。

• 切勿接触掉落的架空电线,通知电力公司该掉

落的电线。

• 在清理和其他活动期间,与架空电线保持至少

10英尺(3米)的距离。如果您在高处工作或处

理长物体,请在工作开始前核实该区域是否存

在架空电线。

• 如果在您驾车时,架空电线掉落至您的车辆上,

请留在车内并继续驶离电线;如果发动机熄火,

请勿离开车辆。警告其他人不要触摸该车辆或

电线。致电或请人致电当地电力公司和紧急服

务中心。

• 站在水中时切勿操作电气设备。

• 除非有相关资质和授权,切勿修理插线板或电

气设备。

• 在通电前,让有资质的电工检查曾经受潮的电气

设备。

• 如果在潮湿的地方工作,检查电线和设备以确

保它们状况良好且没有缺陷,并使用接地故障

断路器(GFCI)。

• 在靠近通电的地方工作时,一定要谨慎小心。

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA (6742)

如需更多信息,请联络:

职业安全

与健康管

理局
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

991 

CA 12-00558 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

 

DIANE TORRENCE AND GEORGE TORRENCE, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V ORDER

SHEILA M. ELDRIDGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

DIXON & HAMILTON, LLP, GETZVILLE (MICHAEL B. DIXON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M.

Siwek, J.), entered June 27, 2011. The order denied the motion of

defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal

signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed on July 27, 2012, 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1177 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1177

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2017

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to release on behalf of the 
United States the condition that certain lands conveyed to the City of 
    Old Town, Maine, be used for a municipal airport, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Removing Outdated Restrictions to 
Allow for Job Growth Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST.

    (a) Release.--Notwithstanding section 32(c) of the Bankhead-Jones 
Farm Tenant Act (7 U.S.C. 1011(c)), if the City of Old Town, Maine, 
makes a written request to the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary 
shall release, convey, and quitclaim, without monetary consideration, 
all rights, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
lands specified in subsection (b).
    (b) Lands Specified.--The lands subject to subsection (a) include 
only the lands--
            (1) conveyed by the United States to the City of Old Town, 
        Maine, under section 32(c) of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant 
        Act (7 U.S.C. 1011(c)) by the deed dated June 5, 1941;
            (2) proposed for conveyance by the City of Old Town, Maine, 
        for the purpose of economic development; and
            (3) described in the written request submitted by the City 
        of Old Town, Maine, to the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to 
        subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

d1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143139(51)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143139 COA: 295980 Wayne CC: 09-011041-FC DARRYL ANTHON Y JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s September 26, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
### 096281 WETX130604228984771 G13C02
X X Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X 

## X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X X X X X X XXX XXX XXX Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

594 22.8 90.1 

### XXX XXX X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX XXX X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX XXX X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X Page 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X 33902 WET 500 CASIES Report - SAN.pdf 

## X XXX XXX See Attachment 002 (WET 500 Reaction Scheme - SAN.pdf)
WET 500 Reaction Scheme - SAN.pdf Page 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONNA

XXX Oxirane, alkyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono(3,5,5-trimethyl alkyl) ether 

## X Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

Substrate wetting additive XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X
Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX 

## X Page 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

XXX

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX



### X X X X X

Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 TEGO WET 500 CASIES Report - Sanitized WET 500 CASIES Report - SAN.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 2c. 1 002 TEGO WET 500 Reaction Scheme - Sanitized WET 500 Reaction Scheme - SAN.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. 1

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name TEGO WET 500 CASIES Report - Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number WETX130604228984771

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name TEGO WET 500 Reaction Scheme - Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number WETX130604228984771
Exhibit24.1

 

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS

              WHEREAS,ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the "Company"), proposes shortlyto file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions ofthe Securities Act of 1934 as amended (the "Act"), the Annual Reporton Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.

              WHEREAS,the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;

              NOW,THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington,D. McAusland and P. Chenard and each of them, as attorneys for the undersignedand in the undersigned's name, place and stead, and in each of theundersigned's offices and capacities as an Officer and/or a Director of theCompany, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving andgranting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all andevery act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and aboutthe premises as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying andconfirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to bedone, by virtue hereof.

              INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of March 2003. 

                                                                          Signed:        /s/ Roland Berger                                                                          Name:         RolandBerger                                                                          Title:            Director
**Exhibit21.1**

 

Listof Subsidiaries of the Company:

 
| **Name  of Entity**               | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                              |       |                       |
| United Sugars Corporation         |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Midwest Agri-Commodities Company  |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| ProGold Limited Liability Company |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Sidney Sugars Incorporated        |       | Minnesota                  |
|                              |       |                       |
| Crab Creek Sugar Company          |       | Minnesota                  |

 

----
SALISBURY,

SEPTEMBER TERM, 1794.

#### Samuel Bailey’s Adm’rs. *v.*Robt. Cochran’s Adm’r.

Former administrators removed, and another appointed, but not made ; a party to this suit. The latter administrator will not be allowed to plead any thing to this suit $ and the former administrators cannot plead the repeal of their letters, after the first term since their repeal. An account settled and signed by one adminístralo]' is binding upon all, and will bear interest from the time it was signed.

In this case it was moved on the part of the Defendant, that he might be at liberty to plead *puis darrein*con.-*121tínuance ; that a judgment had been obtained at the last term of this Court against the administrators of *Cock-*ran, for a sum which was more than sufficient to exhaust all the assets. It was objected on (he part of the Plaintiff, that this suit was brought against two persons, who at that time were the administrators, but who long since had been removed by the County Court of Cumberland, and. the present administrator appointed in their stead, but,.th(at this suit was never against the latter adminis-*tvtfm*;*and that this matter which is now sought to be pleaded, had never been pleaded by the former administrators *;*and that as the present administrator was not any party to this suit, he could not plead the plea moved for. *Et per curiam*— This latter administrator cannot plead any thing to (ha suit: and as to the former administrators, they cannot now plead the repeal of their letters of administration, they should have done so at the. first term after the repeal ,• but. several terms of this Court have intervened since the repeal, and they now-come too late.

The Plaintiff produced an account stated and signed by one of the former administrators, and insisted that by act 1786, *ch.*4, see. 3, he was entitled to interest on the balance of the'account from the time of its being signed j and to this, upon argument, the Court assented, saying the act of one shall bind both. And the Plaintiff had a verdict accordingly.

Noth. — The plea of the repeal of the letters would come as a plea *puis darrein continuance,*anti therefore not allowable, except plead at the proper time. See *Chit. Plead.*636. Whether the act of one administrator is binding upon the others, see *Mangum’s adm'rs. v. Sims,*1 *Car. Law Rep. 547.*—Gordon v. *Finlay,*3 *Hawks,*239.—*Toller on Ex'rs.*403.