alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E94]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2009

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                          HON. LYNN C. WOOLSEY

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, January 14, 2009

  Ms. WOOLSEY. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 2, the 
Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009. In 
2007, more than 8 million children were uninsured, and with the growing 
recession, this number will only grow. Passing this bill will ensure 
that 4 million of those children will receive CHIP, bringing the total 
number of children covered by CHIP to 11 million.
  Expanding health care coverage for our most vulnerable populations, 
including legal immigrant children and some pregnant women, is an 
obligation we cannot afford to ignore. Nearly 400,000 legal immigrant 
children come from families with incomes below 200 percent of the 
Federal poverty level and are ineligible for CHIP solely because they 
are recent immigrants. These families, uninsured and unable to purchase 
private health insurance on their own, are left to fend for themselves 
when they desperately need health care for their children. This is 
unacceptable, and with this legislation, we will reverse this shameful 
practice by providing States with the option of covering these 
deserving low-income families.
  The passage of this bill is a great start, but we must do better. 
While this bill extends coverage to an additional 4 million children, 
including legal immigrants, over 4 million children will still suffer 
without health care coverage. In addition, nearly 90 million people 
went without health coverage for all or part of 2006 and 2007, most of 
them in working families. These numbers are disgraceful. This Congress, 
I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure that our 
children and their families have access to high quality, affordable 
healthcare as a basic human right, not as a luxury.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          67,736
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61,940
<OTHER-SE>                                     (129,676)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .002




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S597]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               2009 NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL STRATEGY--PM 4

  The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message 
from the President of the United States, together with an accompanying 
report; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary:

To The Congress of the United States:
  I am pleased to transmit the 2009 National Drug Control Strategy, 
consistent with the provisions of section 201 of the Office of National 
Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006.
  My Administration released its first National Drug Control Strategy 
in 2002 with the commitment to turn the tide against a problem that 
truly threatens everything that is good about our country. As we 
prepare to pass this noble charge to a new team of leaders, we can look 
back with satisfaction on what we have achieved together as a Nation. 
From community coalitions to our international partnerships, we pursued 
a balanced strategy that emphasized stopping initiation, reducing drug 
abuse and addiction, and disrupting drug markets.
  The results of our efforts are clear. Together we have helped reduce 
teenage drug use by 25 percent since 2001. This means 900,000 fewer 
American teens are using drugs. The Access to Recovery program alone 
has extended treatment services to more than 260,000 Americans. Through 
law enforcement cooperation and international partnerships, the United 
States has caused serious disruptions in the availability of drugs such 
as cocaine and methamphetamine, reducing the threat such drugs pose to 
the American people, while also denying profits to drug traffickers and 
terrorists.
  Our work is by no means complete--we must build on these efforts both 
to further reduce drug use and to rise to new challenges. I thank the 
Congress for its support and ask that it continue to support this 
critical endeavor.
                                                      George W. Bush.  
The White House, January 15, 2009.

                          ____________________
```
1 

### Tax, Wienke

From: Flagg, MichaelA

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:56 AM

To: Wehling, Jefferson

Cc: Tax, Wienke; Kurpius, Meredith; Lakin, Matt Subject: Review of AQMIS Data in Earthjustice Comments on So uth Coast CDD

All (but mostly Jeff) –

After reviewing the data in the comment letter, I h ave determined that it will likely be impossible to recreate these numbers and know exactly what they represent.

I am 99% sure that the data is coming from the cont inuous FEM monitors (w/ waivers and reported under a nonregulatory parameter code in AQS) at the sites iden tified. This difficult part is the Earthjustice num bers are entirely dependent on when they pulled the data from AQMIS. It also seems tha t the data for the “-“ monitors that are referenced in the footnotes are no longer available . I have listed what is currently available in AQMI S as well as what monitor was used for my AQMIS comparison calculatio n.

Below is an assessment of the data:

Essentially, there are a few sources for the discre pancies between the annual means in the table.

(1) “AQMIS Calculated” vs. “Earthjustice Annual Mean” - Timing of AQMIS pull (i.e. different number of sam ples used to calculate the mean) (2) “AQMIS Calculated” vs. “Earthjustice Annual Mean” - The preliminary nature of the data (i.e. sometimes data changes over time) (3) “AQMIS Calculated” vs. “Earthjustice” vs. “AQS FRM” – Bias due to the difference in the method (i.e. F RM vs. FEM)

That being said, I think our main response to their comment should be that the data referenced in thei r letter is nonregulatory and not appropriate to compare against t he NAAQS. We only rely on regulatory data for offic ial design values in a CDD or other regulatory actions. In this case, that is the FRM data in AQS.

Hope this helps!

Let me know if you have questions.2 Thanks!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             185
<SECURITIES>                                     9,864
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                       203
<INVENTORY>                                      1,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,898
<PP&E>                                           1,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                     680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,528
<SALES>                                          2,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,083
<CGS>                                              662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MEDIRISK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1998 AND THE MEDIRISK, INC. CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                       386
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,447
<PP&E>                                           4,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,877
<SALES>                                         10,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.29)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mattson Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
Dutton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



August 14, 2002                   /S/ DAVID DUTTON
                                  -------------------------
                                  David Dutton
                                  Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2198

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRENDA J. DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.

(CA-97-2509-S)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appellant's claims of extortion, libel, and slander under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Davis, No.

CA-97-2509-S (D. Md. Aug. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H170]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                                         House of Representatives,

                                          Office of the Clerk,

                                 Washington, DC, January 12, 2009.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     The Speaker,
     House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on January 9, 2009, at 
     5:15 p.m. and said to contain a message from the President 
     whereby he transmits an agreement between the United States 
     and new NATO Parties on the provision of atomic information.
       With best wishes, I am
           Sincerely,
                                               Lorraine C. Miller,
     Clerk of the House.

                          ____________________
```
CENTRAL TRACTOR FARM & COUNTRY, INC.
Schedule Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands except ratios)
                                                                     Exhibit 12




                                                 Three months ended
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                          SUCCESSOR       |      PREDECESSOR  
                                      -----------------   |   ----------------
                                      January 31, 1998    |   February 1, 1997
                                      -----------------   |   ----------------
                                                          |                    
                                                          |                    
Fixed Charges:                                            |
  Interest expense                         $5,284         |     $  525
  Portion of rent expense                                 |   
    representing interest                     756         |        482
                                           ------         |     ------
                                            6,040         |      1,007
                                           ======         |     ======
                                                          |   
                                                          |   
                                                          |   
Earnings:                                                 |   
  Income  before income taxes               1,375         |      2,013
  Fixed charges                             6,040         |      1,007
                                           ------         |     ------
                                           $7,415         |     $3,020
                                           ======         |     ======
                                                          |
                                                          |                    
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          1.2x          |      3.0x
                                           ======         |     ======
FILED: March 9, 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1839

(8:17

- cv

- 01596

- PJM)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official

capacity and in his individual capacity,

Defendant

- Appellant.

---------------------------------------------------------------

SCHOLAR SETH BARRETT TILLMAN; JUDICIAL EDUCATION PROJECT,

Amici Supporting Appellant

.

ORDER

T he Supreme Court granted Donald J. Trump’s petition for a writ of certiorari from

earlier action in this case , vacated our earlier opinion in In re: Trump , 958 F.3d 274 (4th

Cir. 2020) (en banc), and remanded with instructions to dismiss the case as moot under

United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. , 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950) (noting that the “established

practice” when a case has become moot while on appeal is “to reverse or va cate the2 judgment below and remand with a direction to dismiss”). Accordingly, we dismiss this

appeal as moot

, vacate the decisions below in District of Columbia v. Trump

, 291 F. Supp.

3d 725 (D. Md. 20 18 ) ; 315 F. Supp. 3d 875 (D. Md. 2018 ); and 344 F . Supp. 3d 828 (D.

Md. 2018) , and remand with instructions to dismiss th e case.

FOR THE COURT

/s/Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,540
<SECURITIES>                                    82,234
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,137)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,175
<PP&E>                                         115,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,931)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,462
<BONDS>                                          9,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           318
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,817
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,786
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>