alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1109 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1109

             To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

 Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Hudson, Mr. McNerney, and 
 Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF FACILITY MERGER AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
824b(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``such facilities or any part 
thereof'' and inserting ``such facilities, or any part thereof, of a 
value in excess of $10,000,000''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION FOR CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 203(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824b(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7)(A) Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph, the Commission shall promulgate a 
        rule requiring any public utility that is seeking to merge or 
        consolidate, directly or indirectly, its facilities subject to 
        the jurisdiction of the Commission, or any part thereof, with 
        those of any other person, to notify the Commission of such 
        transaction not later than 30 days after the date on which the 
        transaction is consummated if--
                    ``(i) such facilities, or any part thereof, are of 
                a value in excess of $1,000,000; and
                    ``(ii) such public utility is not required to 
                secure an order of the Commission under paragraph 
                (1)(B).
            ``(B) In establishing any notification requirement under 
        subparagraph (A), the Commission shall, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, minimize the paperwork burden resulting from the 
        collection of information.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 180 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S333]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       80TH ANNIVERSARY OF LULAC

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I rise to call the attention of the Senate 
to the 80th anniversary of the League of United Latin American 
Citizens, LULAC. As a pioneer of the Latino civil rights movement, 
LULAC has long fought to better the economic condition, educational 
attainment, political influence, housing, health and civil rights of 
Americans of Latino descent.
  Eighty years ago, three organizations in south Texas united to combat 
the rampant discrimination faced by Mexican Americans. After decades of 
disenfranchisement, the Latino community in south Texas created a 
movement for equality that has contributed greatly to enhancing the 
livelihood of Latinos throughout the United States. LULAC's successes 
and achievements are many--ranging from the desegregation of schools 
throughout the American Southwest to improving access to jobs and 
government programs.
  Today, as America's oldest national Latino organization, LULAC boasts 
continued service to America's Latino population through more than 48 
employment training centers, 16 regional centers, and employs its great 
knowledge of the needs of the Latino community by advising private, 
nonprofit, and public institutions. Moreover, its unique charter 
structure allows this organization to disseminate important information 
and provide worthwhile services via more than 600 councils throughout 
the United States and Puerto Rico. The need for LULAC's services has 
not subsided through the years and a new generation of Latinos calls 
upon the institutional strength that this organization can provide. The 
challenges we face as a nation can only be resolved by the inclusion of 
all American communities and I value the sage voice of LULAC on the 
strategies to empower Latino communities.
  The organization's early efforts for political and social inclusion 
created a strong base which LULAC and other organizations now utilize 
to improve the quality of life for all American Latinos. I congratulate 
and commend the League of United Latin American Citizens for their long 
record of service to the Latino community and wish them continued 
success.

                          ____________________
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136263 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136263 

 COA: 281978 

Ingham CC: 06-000401-FC

TIMOTHY PAUL HOLLAND, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0924 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 1, 2008 

 Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40429

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Edwin Orlando Tejada-Aria,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:20-CR-2039-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edwin Orlando 

Tejada-Aria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tejada-Aria has not filed a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 7, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40429 Document: 00516121108 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2021
No. 21-40429

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40429 Document: 00516121108 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2021
|ALPHANET SOLUTIONS,
INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This Certification is to
accompany the Quarterly Report of AlphaNet Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report).


I, William S. Medve,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2) |  | Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ WILLIAM S. MEDVE
William S. MedveExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer, AlphaNet Solutions, Inc.
August 13, 2002 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Indo-Pacific CommandUSINDOPACOM

U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Search

Search
Search

-  Home		 
-  Leadership    -  Commander         
  -  Deputy Commander         
  -  Chief of Staff         
  -  Senior Enlisted Leader 
-  About USINDOPACOM    -  History         
  -  USPACOM Area of Responsibility         
  -  USPACOM Previous Commanders         
  -  Women, Peace and Security 
-  Organization    -  Organization Chart 
-  Media    -  News      -  Spotlight 
  -  Photos         
  -  Speeches / Testimony         
  -  Freedom of Information Act      -  FOIA - Reading Room         
    -  Submit FOIA Request         
    -  Request Status         
    -  FOIA FAQS 
-  Resources    -  Travel Requirements         
  -  Useful Theater Information         
  -  FAQ         
  -  Useful Links 
-  Newcomers		 
-  Contact    -  Directory         
  -  Media Inquiries         
  -  Industry Engagements 
-  JTF - Red Hill		 
-  JTF-Micronesia		 

Home : Media : News : News Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# India and United States Renew Commitment to Joint Collaboration on Health

By U.S. Embassy & Consulates in India 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

More News
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 SECTION 906  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §
1350, and in connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Doane Pet Care Company for the quarter ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned officer of Doane Pet Care Company hereby certifies that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Doane Pet Care Company. Date: August 12, 2004 /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEFPhilip K. WoodliefVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDoane Pet Care Company
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Doane Pet Care Company and will be retained by Doane Pet Care
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chris Mickens, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 687]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered March 16, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of as*544sault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 21⁄2 to 5 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Evidence at trial was that defendant, angry with the victim, a fellow resident of his single-room occupancy hotel, for washing dishes in a public sink, hit him over the head with a baseball bat in a corridor of the hotel, defendant claiming that he did so in self-defense because he thought the victim had a knife. On appeal, defendant makes various claims of error in the court’s charge on justification, all of which are unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]), and in any event meritless. As for defendant’s contention that the court should have charged the jury on the use of ordinary force in self-defense, on this record, for the jury to have found defendant guilty, it necessarily had to find that he used deadly force. As for the instruction that defendant had a duty to retreat before using deadly force, there is no merit to defendant’s contention that the hotel corridor where the altercation took place was part of his dwelling and not a public place *(see,*Penal Law § 240.00 [1]; *People v Sullivan,*7 NY 396; *People v Powell,*54 NY2d 524, 526) and that he therefore did not have a duty to retreat. Unlike *People v McCurdy*(86 AD2d 493), the hotel hallway here was not restricted to residents or guests by a locked door, but was unlocked and generally accessible. As for the failure to charge that an initial aggressor can regain the right to self-defense by first withdrawing from the encounter, nothing in the record indicates that defendant withdrew after deadly force was used, which, under the court’s definition of "initial aggressor” as the person "who first uses or is about to use offensively deadly physical force”, could not have been found until defendant hit the victim over the head with the bat. Finally, as for the failure to charge that the jury should put itself in defendant’s place in judging the reasonableness of his actions, we find that the instruction to decide whether defendant’s beliefs were such that he "could fairly and reasonably have in his situation” adequately conveyed the appropriate legal principles. As this Court noted in *People v Hagi*(169 AD2d 203, 211), "further elaboration about the 'subjective’ factors * * * would * * * have been unnecessary in this case since these factors could not reasonably have played any role in the jurors’ assessment of the evidence”. Indeed, the record indicates that had the jury been specifically instructed •with respect to such subjective factors as height, weight, age, and health of the combatants, defendant’s position would hardly have been enhanced. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 7, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H41]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1015
             MAINTAINING AMERICA'S PROSPERITY AND DEMOCRACY

  (Mr. McCOTTER asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. McCOTTER. When the House last met in December, in the dying days 
of the 110th Congress, thanks to the leadership of the Speaker and of 
the chairman of Financial Services and of the people of this body, we 
sent a rescue package for the auto industry over to the Senate. 
Unfortunately, the Senate did not allow it to come up for a vote. 
Fortunately, President Bush and the administration offered and extended 
a bridge loan to the auto industry to keep the hardworking men and 
women employed and to keep America's manufacturing sector vital. We did 
not rejoice.
  We understand that restructuring is necessary and that it will be 
painful. It will intensify and it will continue, but we also vow to do 
what we need to do to ensure that America keeps its engine of 
prosperity and its arsenal of democracy. We will prove the doubters 
wrong.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          53,791
<SECURITIES>                                       152
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,586)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,771
<PP&E>                                       1,413,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                (58,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,569,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,375
<BONDS>                                        582,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     606,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,569,511
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               352,882
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,642
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,338)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

1) ll-K- (A) - 1 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:47 AM Sheet 1 of 325 
P.2 

Ik,Ml 

II-K-(A)-1 

ENERGY POLICY MODEL ASSESSMENT: OVERVIEW AND APPLICABILITY TO IFCAM 

Revised Draft, EEA. 

August 14, 1981. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(A)-1
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION December 29 , 2010 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with PACCAR FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Fri day, December 10 , 2010 b etween PACCAR, EPA, and NHTSA. The attendees included: PACCAR: Dan Kieffer EPA: By ron Bunker , Cle Jackson, Jay Smith, Arvon Mitcham, and Angela Cullen NHTSA: Maurice Hicks The discussion focused primarily on vehicle families .
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 3, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50132 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NELSON LEE HAISLER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

No. 6:04-CR-149-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, AND PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Nelson Haisler appeals his 151-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine
within 1000 feet of a school. Haisler argues that the sentence is
unreasonable under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 756 (2005). He assigns no error in the guidelines computations. He is effectively arguing that the district court erred by sentencing himNo. 05-50132 -2-
pursuant to the mandatory sentencing guidelines regime at the time of sentencing rather than considering the guidelines as only on
factor in determining his sentence. Because Haisler is raisingthis issue for the first time on appeal, plain error is the standard of review. See United States v. Malveaux , 411 F.3d 558, 560
n.9 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 2005 U.S. LEXIS 6485 (U.S. Oct. 3, 2005).
The district court committed error that is plain when it sentenced Haisler under a mandatory sentencing guidelines regime. S ee United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 2005 U.S. LEXIS 6700 (U.S. Oct. 3, 2005);
United States v. Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir. 2005),
cert. denied , 2005 U.S. LEXIS 7577 (U.S. Oct. 11, 2005). Haisler
fails t o meet his burden of showing that the error affected his substantial rights. See Valenzeuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d at 733-34;
United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir. 2005), cert.
denied , 2005 U.S. LEXIS 6132 (U.S. Oct. 3, 2005) ; see also United

States v. Bring ier , 405 F.3d 310, 317 n.4 (5th Cir. 2005), c ert.
denied , 2005 U.S. LEXIS 6686 (U.S. Oct. 3, 2005).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Emtec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dinesh R. Desai, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Dinesh R.
      DesaiDinesh
      R. DesaiChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      25, 2009