alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          34,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                       311
<INVENTORY>                                     19,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,135
<PP&E>                                          61,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,889
<BONDS>                                            650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,735
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,266
<SALES>                                        176,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,848
<CGS>                                          142,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.70
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.2







Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
      S-8 No. 333-136355 and Form S-8 No. 333-122609) pertaining to the Emtec,
      Inc 2006 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and to the Emtec, Inc. 1996
      Stock Option Plan of
      our
      report dated December 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements
      of
      operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Emtec, Inc. for year ended
      August 31, 2005, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
      August 31, 2007.








/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania


November
      27, 2007
CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of Chelsea Property Group, Inc.,
the sole general partner of CPG Partners, L.P. ("the OP"), pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the OP for the period ended March 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the OP.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this
4th day of May, 2005.

| | /s/ Michael J. Clarke
          Michael J. Clarke
          Executive Vice President
          and Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to CPG Partners L.P. and will be retained by CPG Partners
L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0347 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM173AD

767 - 29 - 0057, R2 --- 9/24/09 767 - 29 - 0057, R1 --- 8/14/03 767 - 29 - 0057 --- 12/16/93

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122609) pertaining to the Emtec, Inc 1996 Stock  Option Plan of our report dated December 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements of Emtec, Inc. for year ended August 31, 2005, the period  from April 17, 2004 to August 31, 2004 (Successor Period) and the  period from September 1, 2003 to April 16, 2004 (Predecessor Period),  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and included in this Form  10-K/A.

|                                                      | ** ** |                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|
|                                                      |       |                           |   |
|                                                      |       | /s/ Ernst & Young      LLP |   |
|  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania       June 30, 2006 |       |                           |   |

 

----
TIMOTHY B. COOKSTON,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPT. OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5595

Opinion filed September 7, 2016. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Timothy B. Cookston, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel A. Johnson, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6939
LARRIANTE SUMBRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus INDIANA STATE PRISON; GOVERNOR, Indiana, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00227-sgw) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larriante Sumbry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larriante Sumbry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sumbry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


                                                                Jurisdiction of
         Subsidiary                                             Organization
         ----------                                             ------------
AMREP Southwest Inc.                                            New Mexico
         AMREP Southeast, Inc.                                  Florida
         AMREPCO Inc.                                           Colorado
         Eldorado at Santa Fe, Inc.                             New Mexico
El Dorado Utilities, Inc.                                       New Mexico
Kable News Company, Inc.                                        Illinois
         Kable Fulfillment Services, Inc.                       Delaware
         Kable Fulfillment Services of Ohio, Inc.               Delaware
         Kable News Company of Canada, Ltd.                     Ontario, Canada
         Kable Distribution Services, Inc.                      Delaware
              Kable News Export, Ltd.                           Delaware
              Kable News International, Inc.                    Delaware
Metadata Field Name AM TR CO PD ST Book Patent TD FS Dataset Software

OSTI IDxxxxxxxxxxx

Author Affiliationxxxxxxxxxx

Author Emailxxxxxxxxxx

Author ORCIDxxxxxxxxxx

Author(s)xxxxxxxxxx

Availabilityxxxxxxxxxx

Award DOIxxxxxxxxxxx

Award Funder Namexxxxxxxxxxx

B&R Codesx

Collaboration Name(s)x

Conference/Event Informationxx

Contact Informationxxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor Organization(s)xxxxxxxxxxx

Contributing Organization Type

xxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor(s)xxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor Affiliationxxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor Emailxxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor ORCIDxxxxxxxxxxx

Contributor Typexxxxxxxxxxx

Country of Originxxxxxxxxxxx

Dataset File Extensionx

Dataset Product Number(s)x

Dataset Sizex

Dataset Typex

Description/Abstractxxxxxxxxxxx

Developer(s)x

Developer Affiliationx

Developer Emailx
Metadata Field Name AM TR CO PD ST Book Patent TD FS Dataset Software

Developer ORCID x

Digital Object Identifer/DOI x x x x x x x x x x x

Distribution/Access Limitation(s) x x x x x x x x x x x

Distribution/Access Limitation(s) 

Other Information

x x x x x x x x x x x

Documentation URL x

DOE Award/Contract

Number/Primary Contract

x x x x x x x x x x x

FWP Numbers x

Geolocation Place Name x

Geolocation Type x

Journal Associated Conference

Information

x x

Journal Issue x x

Journal Name x x

Journal Page Range x x

Journal Serial Identifier x x

Journal Type x

Journal Volume x x

Keywords x x x x x x x x x x x

Landing Page x

Language x x x x x x x x x x

Licenses x

License URL x

Medium x x x x x x x x x
Metadata Field Name AM TR CO PD ST Book Patent TD FS Dataset Software

Non-DOE Contract/Award

Number(s)/Additional Awards

xx

NSA Numberxxxxxxxxxx

Originating Research

Organization(s)

xxxxxxxxxxx

Other Identifying Number(s)xxxxxxxxxx

Other Special Requirementsx

Patent Application Numberx

Patent Assigneex

Patent Classification (CPC)x

Patent File Datex

Patent Issue Datex

Patent Number(s)x

Patent Priority Datex

Programming Languagex

Project Typex

Publication/Issue Datexxxxxxxxxx

Publisher Name and Locationxxxxxxxxx

R&D Project IDxxxxxxxxx

Related Document Informationxxxxxxxxxx

Related Identifier(s)xxxxxxxxxxx

Related Identifier Typexxxxxxxxxxx

Related Identifier Relation Typexxxxxxxxxxx

Release Datex

Report/Product Number(s)xxxxxxxxxx

Report Type/Sub Typex

Repository URLx

Research Organizationxxxxxxxxxxx
Metadata Field Name AM TR CO PD ST Book Patent TD FS Dataset Software

Short Name or Acronymx

Site Accession Numberxx

Site Codexxxxxxxxxx

Software needed to utlize the

dataset

x

Sponsoring Organization(s)xxxxxxxxxxx

STI Product Typexxxxxxxxx

STI Product Type Sub Typex

Subject Categoriesxxxxxxxxxx

Titlexxxxxxxxxxx

URLx

Version Numberx

Work Authorization Numberxxxxxxxxx

Work Proposal Numberxxxxxxxxx
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2020

No. 04-19-00836-CV

Al SUAREZ, as Mayor of the City of Converse; Jeff Beehler, as Place 5 Member, City Counsel 

of the City of Converse; Kathy Richel as place 1 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; 

Shawn Russell, as Place 3 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; Marc Gilbert, as Place 

6 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; Le Ann Piatt, as City Manager of the City of 

Converse; Holly Nagy, as Secretary of the City of Converse and City of Converse,

Appellants

v.

Katherine SILVAS,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI22419

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 27, 2020, appellee filed an unopposed motion for a fourteen-day extension of 

time to file appellee’s brief. The unopposed motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that 

appellee’s brief is due no later than February 12, 2020.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) Records

## Figure 270920: OSTIMARC Records System Logo

OSTIMARC Records System

OSTI MARC Records SystemMARC FAQs

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) offers librarians and the library community the opportunity to download records of DOE scientific and technical information (STI) in Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) record format (see MARC FAQs).  By using OSTI's MARC Records System, librarians can now easily expand access to a variety of DOE research and development (R&D) straight from their local catalogs.  This is a free public service provided by OSTI.  We appreciate receiving your thoughts, comments, and questions at MARCrecords@osti.gov. 

MARC format has been the cataloging file format preferred by libraries since its development in the 1960s and has since evolved into MARC 21 format.  MARC 21, which prevents duplication of work and allows for sharing of bibliographic resources across information systems using a common format, is developed and maintained by the Library of Congress.  MARC 21 breaks down record metadata into a series of fields (0xx-9xx) and subfields (a-z) in a way that can be easily ingested into existing cataloging systems.

OSTI MARC Records are derived from existing OSTI records.  The number of MARC records currently available can be found by visiting the OSTI MARC Records System.

## Contents of OSTI.GOV MARC records:

OSTI.GOV provides free public access to full-text documents and bibliographic citations of DOE research literature.  Full-text documents are primarily from 1991 forward, but approximately 25% of the records with full-text are from earlier years.  OSTI.GOV includes STI documents that were produced by DOE, the DOE contractor community, and DOE grantees.  STI documents from DOE predecessor agencies - the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) - are also included.  Legacy documents are added as they become available in electronic format.  MARC Records are available as soon as full-text documents are added to OSTI.GOV.

For more information on MARC records, see the Library of Congress MARC Standards and Understanding MARC information.

                                - Persistent Identifier Services
                                - API Documentation
                                - DOE MARC Records System
                                - Open Archives Initiatives
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodicreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
| August  9, 2005 | /s/  Stephanie G. DiMarco              |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------|
|            | Stephanie  G. DiMarco                  |
|            | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** JUDGMENT N os. 04 - 18 - 00821 - CR, 04 - 18 - 00822 - CR, 04 - 18 - 00823 - CR, 04 - 18 - 00827 - CR, 04 - 18 - 00855 - CR Jake Eric ALVARADO , Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 16 - 10 - 12125 - CR, 16 - 05 - 11980 - CR, 18 - 04 - 12822 - CR, 16 - 05 - 11973 - CR, 16 - 10 - 12126 - CR Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION , JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are AFFIRMED. SIGNED November 27, 2019.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1210 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1210

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ``Pleasanton 
                        Veterans Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2017

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, as the ``Pleasanton 
                        Veterans Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLEASANTON VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 W. Goodwin Street, Pleasanton, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Pleasanton Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Pleasanton 
Veterans Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         19928
<SECURITIES>                                   37900
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18922
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                   423836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              512646
<PP&E>                                        128790
<DEPRECIATION>                                 45457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                610042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         344477
<BONDS>                                        35733
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         205
<OTHER-SE>                                    173157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  610042
<SALES>                                      2233118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2259612
<CGS>                                        1604364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1604364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              589015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                53633
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            34546
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   34546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.46
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covenant Transportation Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David R. Parker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: August 11, 2010
/s/ David R. ParkerDavid R. ParkerChief Executive Officer






Back to Form 10-Q
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  October 25, 2011





/s/ Daniel W. HollisName: Daniel W. HollisTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Director(principal executive officer)