UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549








FORM 10-Q/A


(Amendment No. 2)





x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011





Commission file number:   333-72163




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.





Nevada
58-2550089(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)





3500 Lenox Road, NESuite 1500Atlanta, Georgia  30326(Address of principal executive offices)(404) 419-2440(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x           No  ̈





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).


Yes  ̈ No  ̈





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a larger accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)





Large accelerated filer             ̈
Accelerated filer  ̈Non-accelerated filer               ̈
Smaller reporting company x





Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:
Yes  ̈
No x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes   ̈              No x





State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:


Class

Outstanding at August 15, 2011Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

499,250,000





Explanatory Note:  The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-Q/A to Dutch Gold Resources, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2009 and subsequently amended on Amendment No.1 on Form 10-Q/A, filed on September 14, 201, is to revise the information contained in Item 4. Controls and Procedures and to correct the dates and titles of the certifications included therein.









DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.





FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011


TABLE OF CONTENTS





INDEX
PagePART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATIONITEM 1 – Financial Statements – Unaudited
3Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010
3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and 2010 (Unaudited)
4Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)
5Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6ITEM 2- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
20ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
24ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures
24PART II- OTHER INFORMATIONITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings
26ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
26ITEM 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
26ITEM 4 – Removed and Reserved
26ITEM 5 – Other information
26ITEM 6 – Exhibits
27SIGNATURES
27EXHIBITS





2





PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION





ITEM 1.  Financial Statements





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(Unaudited)





June 30,


December 31,2011


2010ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash and cash equivalents

$
21,425


$
127,397Investments available for sale at fair value


366,645



3,188,250Deferred financing costs, net


13,172



-Other current assets


414,306



150,000Total current assets


815,548



3,465,647LONG-TERM ASSETS:Mineral properties


2,581,155



2,581,155Property, plant and equipment at cost


2,173,628



2,358,424Less accumulated depreciation


(2,167,091
)


(2,112,009
)Net mineral properties and property, plant and equipment


2,587,692



2,827,570Other assets


11,600



11,600TOTAL ASSETS

$
3,414,840


$
6,304,817LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCURRENT LIABILITIES:Accounts payable

$
1,059,344


$
957,626Accounts payable-related parties


669,378



742,947Notes payable-related parties


2,398,000



2,473,962Loans from shareholders


141,907



150,000Convertible notes payable, net


616,282



582,084Payroll liabilities


602,612



658,112Accrued liabilities


388,355



337,443Total current liabilities


5,875,878



5,902,174LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:Warrant liability


1,213,752



1,661,163TOTAL LIABILITIES


7,089,630



7,563,337Commitments and contingenciesSTOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITPreferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized, none issued or outstanding


-



-Series A, Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010


2,000



2,000Series B, Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized,4,500,000 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011;  none authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010


4,500



-Common stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 499,250,000 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011; 372,008,907 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010


499,250



372,009Additional paid-in-capital


20,241,872



17,547,573Stock subscriptions


104,058



104,058Accumulated deficit


(23,850,910
)


(21,246,160
)Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income


(675,560
)


1,962,000Total stockholders' deficit


(3,674,790
)


(1,258,520
)TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

$
3,414,840


$
6,304,817





See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements




3





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


(Unaudited)





Three Months Ended June 30,


Six Months Ended June 30,2011


2010


2011


2010(as restated)





(as restated)RevenueSales

$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-Cost of sales


-



-



-



-Gross profit


-



-



-



-Operational ExpensesSelling, general and administrative expenses


453,278



(1,153
)


870,516



344,234Professional fees


250,856



705,156



479,730



1,645,888Rent and repairs and maintenance


11,845



11,914



29,517



25,498Depreciation


119,939



119,939



239,878



239,878Total operating expenses


835,918



835,856



1,619,641



2,255,498Operating loss


(835,918
)


(835,856
)


(1,619,641
)


(2,255,498
)Other income (expense)Interest expense, net


(596,130
)


-



(1,015,765
)


-Financial settlement expense


(10,981
)


-



(54,181
)


(36,250
)Write-off of other assets


-



-



-



(110,000
)Gain from sale of equipment


55,500



-



55,500



-Change in fair value of warrants


(364
)


(60,049
)


(9,232
)


(60,049
)Gain from reversal of accruals


-



-



-



361,277Gain from settlement of accounts payable


-



80,046



-



80,046Gain from sale of Aultra investment


-



-



-



217,177Realized (loss) gain on sale of securities


(28,001
)


-



38,569



-Loss before income taxes


(1,415,894
)


(815,859
)


(2,604,750
)


(1,803,297
)Provision for income taxes


-



-



-



-Net loss


(1,415,894
)


(815,859
)


(2,604,750
)


(1,803,297
)Basic and diluted loss per share

$
(0.00
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)Weighted average shares outstanding


473,307,535



142,587,709



435,629,454



156,897,542





See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements




4





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(Unaudited)





Six Months Ended June 30,2011


2010(as restated)Operating activities:Net loss

$
(2,604,750
)

$
(1,803,297
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activitiesGain from debt settlement


-



(361,277
)Loss from write-off of other assets


-



110,000Gain from sale of equipment


(55,500
)


-Common stock issued for services


-



1,386,000Common stock issued to extend certain convertible note maturity dates


48,800



-Common stock issued for other settlements


54,181



36,250Preferred stock issued in exchange for services


61,000



-Preferred stock issued to extend certain convertible note maturity dates


228,750



-Accretion of debt discount


516,185



-Depreciation


239,878



239,878Stock compensation expense


52,017



-Change in fair value of warrants


9,232



60,049Amortization of deferred financing costs


13,378



-Gain on sale of Aultra Investment


-



(217,177
)Net realized loss on sale of securities


(38,569
)


-Changes in assets and liabilitiesOther current assets


(1,000
)


-Accounts payable


101,718



68,363Accounts payable-related parties


(73,569
)


158,688Accrued liabilities


129,019



-Net cash used in operating activities


(1,319,230
)


(322,523
)Investing activities:Proceeds from sale of available-for- sale securities


266,236



-Purchases of available-for-sale securities


(43,622
)


-Purchases under subscription agreement


(100,000
)


-Investments in notes receivable


(41,306
)


-Net cash provided by investing activities


81,308



-Financing activities:Proceeds from sale of common stock


-



69,600Proceeds from stock subscriptions


-



40,320Deferred financing costs


(26,550
)


-Proceeds from loans from shareholders


111,000



-Proceeds from notes payable-related parties


625,000



-Proceeds from convertible notes payable


422,500



205,000Net cash provided by financing activities


1,131,950



314,920Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents


(105,972
)


(7,603
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


127,397



24,522Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
21,425


$
16,919SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATIONCash paid during year for interest

$
-


$
-Non-cash Transactions:Common stock issued to settle debt

$
1,057,483


$
115,000Common stock issued to settle accrued expenses


78,107



29,612Proceeds from sale of equipment applied to payroll liability


55,500



-





See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements




5




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION





The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All terms used but not defined elsewhere herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods presented have been included. The 2010 year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.





The Company is restating its historical financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The restatement primarily relates to certain errors in processing transactions resulting in expenses being recorded in the incorrect period and for the incorrect value and the reclassification of the statement of operations to properly reflect expenses by function. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 have been restated to correct for these errors and are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.  For the three months ended June 30, 2010, these corrections in the aggregate increased the Company’s previously reported net loss by $275,235, or ($0.01) per share and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, these corrections in the aggregate reduced the Company’s previously reported net loss by $591,323, or $0.01 per share . Note 15 provides the effect of the restatement on the June 30, 2010 condensed consolidated financial statements.





NATURE OF OPERATIONS





Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of gold mining projects in the Americas. The Company is focused on developing its existing mining properties in North America and acquiring and developing new mines with the expectation that the properties can enter production within 12 to 24 months. The Company operates in one reporting segment.





PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION





We generally act as a sole proprietor, but may enter joint agreements with other companies in an effort to achieve our stated operating objectives. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and include our accounts and our wholly-owned subsidiaries’ accounts (collectively, the “Company”).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in prior year presentations have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.





USE OF ESTIMATES AND PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.




6




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 2 – ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF AULTRA GOLD





Stock Purchase Agreement – Aultra Gold





Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Rauno Perttu, Strategic Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Aultra Gold Capital Inc., a Turks and Caicos corporation, the Company acquired a 67% controlling interest of Aultra Gold, Inc. (“Aultra” or “Aultra Gold”) by acquiring 6,442,500 of Aultra’s existing common shares for a purchase price of one million newly-issued shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The transaction closed on January 6, 2010. The total value of the one million shares issued based on the Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. common share closing price of $0.135 per share was $135,000.





In addition, in accordance with the Stock Purchase Agreement, in 2010 the Company forgave $269,919 in advances that the Company previously made to Aultra Gold which were secured by a promissory note and recorded as an Other Current Asset by the Company as of December 31, 2009. As the forgiveness of the advances occurred resulting from the execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement, management determined that the amount forgiven should be included in the overall value of the controlling interest acquired; therefore, the Company determined that the fair value of the Aultra controlling interest was $404,919.





Asset Purchase Agreement – Aultra Gold





On January 6, 2010, Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with DGRI ADGI Acquisition Corporation (the “Purchaser” and a Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. wholly owned subsidiary) and Aultra Gold, Inc. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of Aultra Gold’s assets, which primarily consisted of the mining rights to a project in Montana and a project in Nevada.  As consideration for these assets, the Company issued 9,614,667 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to Aultra Gold for a total value of $1,297,980 based on the $0.135 per share market price of Dutch Gold’s common stock.  In addition, in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. executive and an Aultra Gold executive collectively 9,505,000 Dutch Gold common shares for a total value of $1,283,175 based on the $0.135 per share market price of Dutch Gold’s common stock. The purpose for issuing these shares was to incentivize these executives that were instrumental in the transaction and to ensure that these key executives would continue to be involved with the acquired projects. The Company does not believe the substance of the issuance of shares to the executives was to provide compensation for these executives and therefore have accounted for the consideration in accordance with the acquisition method. Based on these transactions, the Company determined that the consideration paid resulting from the Asset Purchase Agreement was $2,581,155 and has accounted for the transaction using the acquisition method of accounting with the purchase price assigned to the net assets acquired based on the fair value of such assets at the date of acquisition.





In accordance with the transaction, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets related to Aultra Gold’s gold and mineral business. Management determined that the value of the assets obtained primarily relate to the mineral rights associated with the property in Basin Gulch, Montana. Dutch Gold was granted an assignment of the Basin Gulch Mine lease between Aultra Gold and Strategic Minerals as a result of the acquisition.





In order to determine fair value the mineral rights acquired, management utilized a compilation and review report prepared by a third-party which documented the estimated mineralization related to the Basin Gulch Mine property. Based on these findings, management estimated the value beyond estimated mineralization (VBEM) and the Company determined that the fair value of the total consideration paid of $2,581,155 resulting from the Asset Purchase Agreement should be allocated to the mineral rights acquired. The Company has recorded the acquired mineral rights fair value as Mineral properties on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a separate component of property, plant and equipment. As the mineral rights represent a tangible asset, the assigned fair value should be amortized over the useful life of the mineral right based on the units of production method. Management will begin the amortization of the asset once development of the site commences in accordance with the units of production method.





Summary of Stock Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement – Aultra Gold





As a result of the Stock Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 6, 2010, Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. owned 67% of the common shares of publicly traded Aultra and the assets of Aultra Gold which primarily related to mineral rights. Subsequent to these transactions, Aultra was basically a public shell consisting of liabilities that were not assumed by the Company and a deficit.




7




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 2 – ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF AULTRA GOLD (CONTINUED)





Aultra Gold is engaged in the business of acquiring and exploring gold and mineral properties, with the objective of identifying gold and mineralized deposits economically worthy of continued production and/or subsequent development, mining or sale.





Dutch Gold pursued the transactions with Aultra as the Company’s mission is to become a recognized gold producer within two years with a key to this objective being the acquisition of late stage exploration projects that can be quickly advanced to production. Based on the assets that Aultra controlled, specifically the rights to the Basin Gulch Mine property, the Company determined that the acquisition met its strategic objectives and that management believes that it has the financial resources to produce and realize the mineral rights related to the property.





Except as noted in the preceding paragraphs and as disclosed in the Stock Purchase Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement, there were no material relationships among the Company and Aultra or any of their respective affiliates. It is the policy of the Company to segregate each of its mining projects into separate, wholly owned special purpose vehicles, for the purposes of risk mitigation and financing. The acquisition of the controlling interest in Aultra Gold was made as an investment to be held either for a spin-off or other value creation event. The Asset Purchase Agreement was executed as the Company believes that it has the resources to develop the mineral rights related to the projects acquired.





Shamika Transaction





On March 26, 2010, Aultra Gold, Inc., which had been a 67% owned subsidiary of Dutch Gold since the January 6th transactions discussed previously, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with Shamika 2 Gold Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“Shamika”).   In general terms, Aultra was a public shell with limited assets and Shamika was a private company that acquired the Aultra public shell in a reverse acquisition allowing Shamika, after the transaction, to be a registrant.





Pursuant to the agreement, Aultra acquired all of the outstanding shares (the “Shamika Shares”) from the Shamika Holders in exchange for an aggregate of 25,500,000 newly issues shares of Aultra’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Exchange”). As a result of the acquisition and other concurrent transactions in Aultra’s shares, Aultra Gold, Inc. (now publically traded as Shamika 2 Gold) had 50,000,000 million shares outstanding with 967,467 pertaining to the reversed Aultra shell. Accordingly, the Exchange represented a change in control.





For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of Aultra by Shamika, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with Shamika as the acquirer. Upon consummation of the Exchange, Aultra adopted the business plan of Shamika.





The business purpose of this transaction was that Shamika wanted to be a publicly traded company in order to have access to the capital markets which would provide access to funding for mining development opportunities.  As Aultra had no operations subsequent to the Asset Purchase agreement noted above, issuing shares that would result in Shamika having a controlling interest allowed Aultra (and Dutch Gold) to retain shares in a company that had the financial resources to pursue and develop new mining opportunities.





In connection with the Reverse Acquisition and on the same date, Shamika issued 23,546,067 shares of its common stock in order to satisfy certain liabilities in the amount of $301,512. As part of this transaction Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. was issued 4,950,000 shares (9.9%) of Shamika Gold Inc. The Company determined the fair value of the 4,950,000 common shares received as $1,237,500 which approximated the value of the shares on the first day that Shamika’s common shares were publicly traded. As a result of the reverse acquisition by Shamika, Dutch Gold retained the remaining Aultra liabilities not acquired of $616,154 which represents amounts owed to a former officer of Aultra (now a Dutch Gold executive), Rauno Perttu. Dutch Gold issued 10,000,000 shares to Rauno Perttu in July 2010 which reduced this liability by $200,000 ($200,000 represented the fair value of the shares on the date of issuance). Therefore, the Company has remaining a $416,154 liability which is recorded in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 within the Accounts payable-related parties account line.




8




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 2 – ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF AULTRA GOLD (CONTINUED)





At March 26, 2010, resulting from the Shamika transaction, the Aultra Board of Directors and Officers was reconstituted by the resignation of: Rauno Perttu from his role as President, Secretary and Director, Daniel Hollis from his role as Chief Executive Officer and Director, Lance Rosmarin from his role as Director, and the appointment of Robert Vivian as President and Chief Executive Officer and Terence Orstlan as Secretary and Director. The Company owns less than 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of Shamika as of June 30, 2011. Subsequent to the transaction date, Dutch Gold no longer has a controlling interest in Aultra nor does management have the ability to exercise significant influence over Shamika’s operating and financial policies. The Company has classified the fair value of its investment in Shamika as an available-for-sale security. Refer to Note 4 for additional discussion on this investment.





Management viewed its initial controlling interest in Aultra as substantive during the period from January 6, 2010 through March 26, 2010 as the Company’s involvement and expertise was needed in order to execute an agreement with Shamika. In addition, during this interim period Aultra’s board of directors consisted of two directors from Dutch Gold. These directors were instrumental in the Shamika transaction. Although the controlling interest was obtained on January 6, 2010 and subsequently sold on March 26, 2010, the Company did not consolidate the financial results of Aultra for this interim period as Aultra’s results were not material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. In addition, pro-forma financials related to Aultra’s operations have not been provided as we deem this information not to be beneficial to our shareholders as Aultra’s operating activity was minimal and would not have a material effect on our operations.





We recorded our $404,169 investment in Aultra resulting from the Stock Purchase Agreement under the equity method. As stated above, we effectively sold Aultra through a reverse acquisition by Shamika on March 26, 2010. A gain on the disposition of the controlling interest of Aultra resulted from the sale to Shamika. Management determined that the gain recorded would be the difference in our initial fair value investment in Aultra ($404,169) less the $621,346 fair value of the consideration received from the Shamika transaction ($621,346 calculated as the fair value of the Shamika shares received of $1,237,500 less Aultra debt assumed of $616,154). Thus, the Company recorded in our statement of operations a $217,177 gain on sale of our Aultra investment for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.





NOTE 3—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT





The Company measures its investments based on a fair value hierarchy disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of asset or liability and their characteristics. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:





•
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.





•
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.





•
Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.





The Company categorizes its investments as either trading, available for sale, or held to maturity.  The Company does not hold any securities for trading purposes or that we believe would be considered held to maturity.  The Company’s investments are comprised of available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable income taxes, recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income.  The Company reviews its investments quarterly for declines in market value that are other than temporary in addition to re-evaluating the investment classification.





The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts payable, notes payables, loans from shareholders and accrued expenses.  The Company considers the carrying values of its financial instruments in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short term nature of such items. The fair values of the Company's debt instruments are calculated based on debt with similar maturities, credit quality and current market rates of interest. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest risks arising from these financial instruments.




9




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 4—INVESTMENTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE





As disclosed in Note 2, resulting from the Shamika Gold transaction, in 2010 the Company acquired 4,950,000 shares of common stock of Shamika 2 Gold with an investment value of $1,237,500.  Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time, but not necessarily to be held to maturity or on a long-term basis, are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of shareholders' deficit in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.  Based on management’s current intent of holding the majority of the shares in Shamika 2 Gold equity security, the investment is classified as a short term investment in available for sale securities. The common stock of Shamika 2 Gold is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “SHMX” and is, therefore, considered a Level 1 investment in the fair value hierarchy.





As of December 31, 2010, the Company held 4,905,000 Shamika 2 Gold shares and recorded a fair value of $3,188,250 as investments available for sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2011, the Company held 4,073,836 shares with a fair value recorded of $366,645 and a $675,560 unrealized loss in its investment due to the decrease in the fair market value of Shamika 2 Gold’s shares during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. Management believes that the decline its investment is considered temporary and therefore no write down of the investment value as of June 30, 2011 is needed.





NOTE 5—OTHER CURRENT ASSETS





Other current assets are comprised of:





June 30,


December 31,2011


2010Subscription payment for Shamika 2 Gold shares

$
200,000


$
100,000Performance Bond


50,000



50,000Note Receivable - Trellis Corporation


41,306



-Pre-paid management fees


122,000



-Other current assets


1,000



-Total other current assets

$
414,306


$
150,000





As a result of subscription agreements that were executed with Shamika 2 Gold, the Company has remitted $100,000 and $200,000 in payments as of December 31, 2010 and as of June 30, 2011, respectively, to acquire additional common shares of Shamika 2 Gold. These shares were not received as of June 30, 2011 and therefore the payments are recorded as an Other Current Asset on the consolidated balance sheet. Receipts of the shares are expected prior to September 30, 2011.





In March, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Trellis Corporation in the amount of $41,000 as an advance to Trellis pertaining to their mining operations.  The note bears an annual interest rate of 8% and is due upon demand and interest income in the amount of $306 has been recorded for the period ending June 30, 2011.





Refer to Note 8 for discussion on the $122,000 other current asset recorded as of June 30, 2011.




10





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 6—MINERAL PROPERTIES AND PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT





June 30,


December 31,2011


2010Mine and Mill Equipment

$
2,173,628


$
2,358,424Mineral Properties


2,581,155



2,581,155$
4,754,783


$
4,939,579Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization


2,167,091



2,112,009Net carrying value

$
2,587,692


$
2,827,570





There was $239,878 and $239,878 charged to operations for depreciation expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.





The Internal Revenue Service has a Federal lien on the Company’s subsidiary Dutch Mining, LLC’s equipment, real property and leases in the amount of $567,062 as of June 30, 2011. The State of Oregon Department of Revenue has a lien on the Company’s subsidiary Dutch Mining, LLC’s personal and real property in the amount of $35,550 as of June 30, 2011. These liens arose from unpaid Federal and state payroll taxes from the closed Benton Mine operation in Oregon. The unpaid taxes aggregating $602,612 as of June 30, 2011 and $658,112 as of December 31, 2010, respectively, are recorded as Payroll Liabilities, under Current Liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold certain fully depreciated equipment and applied the $55,000 in proceeds received against the Company’s State of Oregon Department of Revenue payroll liability lien. Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. has not accrued for penalties and interest associated with these liens as it is more likely than not that the Company will not be liable for such amounts.





NOTE 7—CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE





Convertible Notes Payable is comprised of:





June 30,


December 31,2011


2010Convertible Promissory Notes

$
616,170


$
577,060Convertible Debentures


355,000



200,000$
971,170


$
777,060Less: unamortized debt discount


354,888



194,976Net carrying value

$
616,282


$
582,084





The Company had convertible promissory notes outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 in the amount of $616,170 and $577,060 respectively. These notes bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 21% per annum and mature within the next twelve months. Under the convertibility terms of the convertible promissory notes, the principal, plus accrued interest can be converted immediately upon maturity, at the option of the holder, either in whole, or in part, into fully paid common shares of the Company.





The Company had convertible debentures outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 in the amount of $355,000 and $200,000 respectively. The debentures bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 12% per annum. Under the convertibility terms of the debenture, the principal, plus accrued interest can be converted immediately, at the option of the holder, either in whole, or in part, into fully paid common shares of the Company.





The convertible promissory notes and the convertible debenture contain a beneficial conversion feature which allows the holder of the note to convert the note into common shares of the Company at a price less than market. The Company has computed and recorded a $719,074 and $293,046 value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, for the beneficial conversion feature pertaining to the convertible notes. This amount is recorded as a discount to the principal amount of the note and is amortized to interest expense utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related note as the results are not materially different from those which would result from the interest method. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $354,888 and $194,976, respectively, in unamortized discount remained associated with the beneficial conversion feature.




11




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 7—CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)





Deferred financing costs of $106,050 were incurred and capitalized as of June 30, 2011 related to obtaining the convertible notes executed in fiscal 2011. The deferred financing fees are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related convertible note agreement.





On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with two convertible promissory noteholders which resulted in the issuance of 4,000,000 common shares and 2,500,000 in Series B Convertible Preferred stock. As a result of the forbearance agreement and the consideration provided by the Company to these noteholders, the noteholders agreed to defer their conversion rights for an additional 90 days pertaining to $195,810 in convertible notes payable. The common share issuance was valued at $48,800 based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. In addition, the Series B Convertible Preferred stock issuance was valued at $228,750 based on utilizing the market value (the price of the last reported trade) of the DGRI stock on the date of issue, application of a preference premium as well as factoring in a liquidity discount. These fair value amounts have been recorded as interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as the forbearance agreements provided, which resulted from the issuance of shares by the Company, extended the conversion term for a period that primarily relates to the three month period ended June 30, 2011.





On July 27, 2011, the Company entered into an extension agreement with the two aforementioned convertible promissory noteholders whereby the Company was required to transfer the rights of 600,000 shares of its Shamika 2 Gold shares to these noteholders. As a result of this transaction, the noteholders extended the forbearance of their rights to convert the notes into shares of common stock to September 15, 2011. These forbearance agreements were executed as the Company did not have sufficient shares of common stock to satisfy the conversion terms of the notes.





NOTE 8—CAPITAL STOCK





Preferred Stock





As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 2,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value Series A Convertible Preferred stock issued and outstanding. During 2010, 1,000,000 shares were issued each to two executives in order to compensate these executives for compensation owed to them in accordance with their employment agreements. The value of the stock issued approximated the fair value of the services performed which was $250,000. The Series A Convertible Preferred stock provides the conversion right to common shares along with voting rights over common shareholders. There have been no Series A Convertible Preferred stock issuances in 2011.





On April 8, 2011, in addition to the 2,500,000 Series B Convertible Preferred share issuance discussed in Note 7, 1,000,000 in Series B Convertible Preferred shares were issued each to two executives in order to compensate these executives for their services.  The $183,000 total fair value of the stock issued was computed based on utilizing the market value (the price of the last reported trade) of the DGRI stock on the date of issue, application of a preference premium as well as factoring in a liquidity discount. A total of $61,000 was expensed for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and is reflected within Selling, general and administrative expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations at June 30, 2011. The balance of the total valuation in the amount of $122,000, is reflected as another current asset in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and will be amortized to Selling, general and administrative expense over the service period. The Series B Convertible Preferred stock provides the conversion right to common shares along with voting rights over common shareholders.





Common Stock





As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 499,250,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding. Common Stock was issued during the three months ended June 30, 2011, to retire various debt and payable obligations of the Company based upon the actual balance and any accrued interest.  The consideration for settlement amounts for payments from the Company’s common shares was arrived at by utilizing the market value (the price of the last reported trade) of the DGRI stock on the date of issue.




12





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 8—CAPITAL STOCK (CONTINUED)





Warrants





As of June 30, 2011, the Company had the following warrants for the purchase of shares of common stock issued and outstanding:





Warrants Outstanding


Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


Aggregate

Intrinsic

ValueOutstanding, December 31, 2010


11,635,833


$
0.48



-Granted


-



-



-Forfeited/Expired


(3,333,333
)


(0.50
)


-Exercised


-



-



-Outstanding, June 30, 2011


8,302,500


$
0.23


$
0





No Share Purchase Warrants were issued for the period ending June 30, 2011. These common share purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and as such, we estimate the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the issuance date. Some of the warrants provide that in the event the Company is unable to issue registered shares upon exercise, the warrant holders are entitled, under securities laws, to receive freely tradable shares pursuant to a "cashless exercise" provision. However, based on interpretation of ASC 815, there is a required presumption of net cash settlement.





We determined that these warrants issued create a related liability in accordance with ASC 480-10-55-29 & 30 due to the fact that some of the warrants could be settled for cash.  In our estimation of the value of this liability, we interpreted and applied the concept of "Fair Value" from ASC 820. We took into account the remote probability of the occurrence of a fundamental transaction triggering a right to cash settlement as a probability factor in applying a Black-Scholes valuation of the warrants. The warrants have been recorded at their relative fair values at issuance and will continue to be recorded at fair value each subsequent balance sheet date.  Any change in value between reporting periods is recorded as Other Income (expense) each reporting date.  The warrants are reported as a liability rather than as equity.  The fair value of the warrants is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.





As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the warrants was determined to be $1,213,752 and $1,661,163, respectively. Accordingly, we recorded $9,232 and $60,049 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, in losses from the valuation of the warrant liability related to the change in the fair value of the warrants. The 3,333,333 warrants issued in 2009, expired in the period ended March 31, 2011, with $456,643 being reclassified from liabilities to stockholders' deficit in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2011 have exercise prices ranging from $0.02 to $1.15 with expiration dates ranging from June 9, 2012 to December 9, 2014. The remaining weighted average contractual life of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2011 is 1.97 years.




13




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 9—STOCK BASED COMPENSATION





Effective April 1, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a 4,000,000 nonqualified stock option grant to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board, pursuant to the Company's Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. The options granted were immediately vested and exercisable on the grant date, expire two years from the grant date, and were issued to compensate Embassy International, LLC for entering into previous lending arrangements which has allowed the Company to fund operations and to continue its development activities. The grant date fair value of these options was $52,017. The Company has recorded stock-based compensation expense of $52,017 within Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to this option grant during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. No stock options were granted or outstanding in 2010. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has 4,000,000 stock options outstanding.





The Company estimated the fair value of its 2011 stock option grant utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions:





Risk-free interest rate


0.80
%Expected life

2.0 yearsExpected volatility


355.0
%Dividend yield


0.00
%





The risk-free interest rate is based on the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatilities are based on historical daily volatility of the Company’s stock. As the option was awarded to a nonemployee, the expected life is estimated as the contractual term of the option agreement.





NOTE 10—PER SHARE DATA





Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus common stock equivalents (if dilutive) related to warrants, convertible notes and convertible preferred stock.





The Company has excluded all common equivalent shares outstanding for warrants, convertible notes and convertible preferred stock to purchase common stock from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because all such securities are antidilutive for the periods presented. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 8,302,500 warrants, 175,086,445 potential shares which may be issued resulting from the provisions of convertible notes and 6,500,000 in convertible preferred stock to purchase common stock were outstanding. As of December 31, 2010, 11,635,833 warrants, 75,454,246 potential shares which may be issued resulting from the provisions of convertible notes and 2,000,000 in convertible preferred stock to purchase common stock were outstanding.





NOTE 11—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS





Notes Payable-related parties





The Company assumed a note that was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $1,214,926 to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. This is a demand note with $900,000 secured by the mill equipment with a 0% interest rate. The balance outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $0 and $650,962, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the balance was settled through the issuance of stock.





The Company assumed a note that was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $250,000 to Gabriela Dienhart-Engel, who is the daughter of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%. The note is partially secured by the title to the Gold Bug mine. The balance outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $250,000.





The Company assumed a note that was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $100,000 to Caruso-Dienhart TBE Family Trust, LLC., a Company related to the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%. The note is partially secured by the Gold Bug mine and certain equipment used by the Company.  The balance outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $50,000 and $100,000, respectively.




14




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 11—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)





Notes Payable-related parties (continued)





The Company assumed a note that was issued by Dutch Mining LLC in the amount of $950,000 to Josef Bauer for working capital.  The note is guaranteed by Ewald Dienhart and carries an interest rate of 8.0%. The balance outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $950,000.





All notes listed above are due on demand.





The Company owes $129,000 and $129,000 at an interest rate of 7% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures on November 10, 2011.





The Company owes $136,000 and $136,000 at an interest rate of 7% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures on November 10, 2011.





The Company owes $258,000 and $258,000 at an interest rate of 6% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures on February 16, 2012.





The Company owes in aggregate $300,000 and $0 at an interest rate of 7% for four short term notes at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. These notes mature on February 15, 2012.





The Company owes $82,500 and $0 at an interest rate of 6% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures in twelve months from March 31, 2011.The Company owes $117,500 and $0 at an interest rate of 7% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures in twelve months from April 1, 2011.





The Company owes $35,000 and $0 at an interest rate of 7% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures in twelve months from May 5, 2011.





The Company owes $90,000 and $0 at an interest rate of 6% for a short term note at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, to Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board. This note matures in twelve months from May 26, 2011.





Accounts Payable-related parties





Daniel W. Hollis, CEO of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. has advanced a total of $233,374 and $265,934 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  The cash was used for general corporate purposes by the Company.





Rauno Perttu, COO of Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. has a balance owing to him of $436,004 and $477,013 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. In 2010, Dutch Gold retained the remaining Aultra liabilities not acquired of $616,154 which represents amounts owed to the now former officer of Aultra, Rauno Perttu. Dutch Gold issued 10,000,000 shares to Rauno Perttu in July 2010 which reduced this liability by $200,000 ($200,000 represented the fair value of the shares on the date of issuance). Therefore, the Company has remaining a $416,154 liability related to the Aultra transaction which is included in the balance owed as of June 30, 2011.




15





NOTE 12—FINANCIAL CONDITION AND GOING CONCERN





As of June 30, 2011, the Company had cash on hand of $21,425, investments available for sale of $366,645, a working capital deficit of approximately $5.2 million and has incurred a loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuance is dependent on raising capital and generating revenues sufficient to sustain operations. The Company believes that the necessary capital will be raised and has entered into discussions to do so with certain individuals and companies. However, as of the date of these condensed consolidated financial statements, no formal agreement exists.





The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to secure the necessary capital and continue as a going concern.





NOTE 13—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES





The Company leases office space in Atlanta, Georgia under a one-year renewable contract presently at approximately $2,500 per month.





NOTE 14 – MINING LEASE AND OPTION TO PURCHASE





BASIN GULCH





Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. was granted an assignment of the Basin Gulch Mine lease between Aultra Gold, Inc. and Strategic Minerals, Inc. in 2010 as a result of the Asset Purchase agreement with Aultra as discussed in Note 2.





On May 31, 2006, AGDI entered into a Mining Lease Agreement with Strategic Minerals, Inc. (“Strategic”) whereby Strategic granted AGDI the exclusive right to explore, evaluate, develop, and mine the Basin Gulch Property, Montana. The advanced exploration and test mining project consists of eleven patented mineral claims, surrounded by the Deer Lodge National Forest, totaling about 217.9 acres. The claims are all located at the head of Basin Gulch, on the northern slopes of the West Fork Buttes, within the Sapphire Range of the Western Montana Rocky Mountains. The three-stage Mining Lease Agreement for Basin Gulch is structured as follows:





Stage 1 initial payment:





ADGI paid its initial cash payment of $10,000 and prior to July 30, 2006 satisfied its reporting obligations to Strategic regarding all the exploration and studies conducted on the premises of Basin Gulch Property. This initial payment was expensed when paid.





Stage 2 advance production royalties:





To further evaluate and develop the minerals, AGDI fulfilled the following obligations:





i) By June 10, 2006, it paid a cash payment of $15,000 directly to the underlying property owner;





ii) By September 10, 2006 made cash payment of $25,000 directly to the underlying property owner, and at the end of each following


six month period to date.





iii) Since 2008, Dutch Gold Resources, Inc. made such payments under an agreement with Aultra Gold, which granted a security interest in all the claims to the AGDI.   Since 2008, DGRI has made semi- annual cash payments of $25,000 to the underlying land owner. No further payments have been or will be made to Strategic based on subsequent agreements between Strategic and the Company.





Stage 3 production royalties:





Upon commencement of production, the Company must pay the greater of:





i) A twice annual cash payment of $25,000 due on March 10 and September 10 of each year; or





ii) 3% of the gross sales receipts of the gold and silver sold, due semi-annually on March 10 and September 10 of each year;




16





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 14 – MINING LEASE AND OPTION TO PURCHASE (CONTINUED)





Should production be suspended for a period of 6 months or longer, the twice annual advance production royalty of $25,000 listed above resumes. Upon the completion of payments totaling $8,000,000, the Company will have purchased the mineral rights to this property. As of June 30, 2011, production had not commenced and, therefore, the Stage 3 related production royalties were not owed.





JUNGO





On June 1, 2007, the Company entered into a formal binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale (the "Agreement") with W.R. Hansen, an individual (the “Seller”), pursuant to which the Company acquired from the Seller certain mining claims together with all improvements and all equipment owned by the Seller located thereon, located in Humboldt County, State of Nevada (the “Property”). In consideration of the purchase of the Property, the Company agreed to: (i) reimburse the Seller for all staking and filing costs related to the Property, (ii) issue to the Seller 50,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), valued at $0.50 per share, (iii) upon its sole determination of sufficient mineralization to place the Property in production, to further issue to the Seller an additional 50,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock, such that the Company shall make such a determination not later than 30 days following the acquisition of the data contemplated by paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement, (iv) not later than 10 days following the date the Property is placed into development for production of metals, to issue to the Seller an additional 100,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and (v) as further consideration after the Property is placed in production, to direct to the Seller a monthly Net Smelter Royalty of 2% upon all gold, silver, copper, or other metals (the “Metals”) produced and sold from the Property (each royalty payment shall be paid not later than 30 days following the last day of the month in which the metals were produced and sold). Closing of the sale and purchase of the Property occurred on the same date, as under the Agreement both the Company and the Seller have performed their mutual obligations under paragraph 2.2 and Section 4 thereof. As of June 30, 2011, the Jungo property was not in production.





17





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 15 –RESTAMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The Company is restating its historical financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The restatement primarily relates to certain errors in processing transactions resulting in expenses being recorded in the incorrect period and for the incorrect value and the reclassification of the statement of operations to properly reflect expenses by function. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 have been restated to correct for these errors and are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.  For the three months ended June 30, 2010, these corrections in the aggregate increased the Company’s previously reported net loss by $275,235, or ($0.01) per share and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, these corrections in the aggregate reduced the Company’s previously reported net loss by $591,323, or $0.01 per share.





The restatement effect on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 is reflected below.




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED AS RESTATED)





Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)


Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)As previously








As previouslyreported


Adjustments


As restated


reported


Adjustments


As restatedRevenueSales

$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-


$
-Cost of sales


-



-



-



-



-



-Gross profit


-



-



-



-



-



-Operational ExpensesSelling, general and administrative expenses


298,771



(299,924
)


(1,153
)


1,903,902



(1,559,668
)


344,234Professional fees


-



705,156



705,156



-



1,645,888



1,645,888Rent and repairs and maintenance


11,914



-



11,914



25,498



-



25,498Depreciation


119,939



-



119,939



239,878



-



239,878Total operating expenses


430,624



405,232



835,856



2,169,278



86,220



2,255,498Operating loss


(430,624
)


(405,232
)


(835,856
)


(2,169,278
)


(86,220
)


(2,255,498
)Other income (expense)Interest expense, net


(110,000
)


110,000



-



(225,342
)


225,342



-Financial settlement expense


-



-



-



-



(36,250
)


(36,250
)Gain from reversal of accruals


-



-



-



-



361,277



361,277Write-off of other assets


-



-



-



-



(110,000
)


(110,000
)Change in fair value of waarnts


-



(60,049
)


(60,049
)


-



(60,049
)


(60,049
)Gain from settlement of accounts payable


-



80,046



80,046



-



80,046



80,046Gain from sale of Aultra investment


-



-



-



-



217,177



217,177Loss before income taxes


(540,624
)


(275,235
)


(815,859
)


(2,394,620
)


591,323



(1,803,297
)Provision for income taxes


-



-



-



-



-



-Net loss


(540,624
)


(275,235
)


(815,859
)


(2,394,620
)


591,323



(1,803,297
)Basic and diluted loss per share

$
(0.00
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.02
)

$
0.01


$
(0.01
)Weighted average shares outstanding


149,744,622



(7,156,914
)


142,587,709



149,744,622



7,152,920



156,897,542





18




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 15 –RESTAMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)





The restatement effect on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is reflected below.





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED AS RESTATED)





Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)As previouslyreported


Adjustments


As restatedOperating activities:Net loss

$
(2,394,620
)

$
591,323


$
(1,803,297
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activitiesWrite-off of accounts payable


265,366



(265,366
)


-Gain from debt settlement


-



(361,277
)


(361,277
)Loss from write-off of other assets


-



110,000



110,000Common stock issued to retire debt


106,525



(106,525
)


-Common stock issued for services


1,174,072



211,928



1,386,000Common stock issued for payment of interest


225,342



(225,342
)


-Common stock issued for other settlements


-



36,250



36,250Depreciation


239,878



-



239,878Change in fair value of warrants


-



60,049



60,049Gain on sale of Aultra investment


-



(217,177
)


(217,177
)Changes in assets and liabilitiesOther current assets


349,669



(349,669
)


-Accounts payable


(201,663
)


270,026



68,363Accounts payable-related parties


(7,312
)


166,000



158,688Accrued liabilities


(149,536
)


149,536



-Net cash used in operating activities


(392,279
)


69,756



(322,523
)Financing activities:Proceeds from loans from sale of debentures


357,000



(357,000
)


-Proceeds from loans from sale of common stock, net


25,946



43,654



69,600Proceeds from stock subscriptions


-



40,320



40,320Proceeds from loans from convertible notes payable


-



205,000



205,000Net cash provided by financing activities


382,946



(68,026
)


314,920Net increase in cash and cash equivalents


(9,333
)


1,730



(7,603
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


25,845



(1,323
)


24,522Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
16,512


$
407


$
16,919SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATIONCash paid during year for interest

$
-


$
-


$
-Non-cash Transactions:Common shares issued to settle debt

$
106,525


$
8,475


$
115,000Common shares issued to settle accrued expenses


-



29,612



29,612




NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:





The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued.  The Management of the Company determined that there were no subsequent events required to be disclosed.





19




DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations





Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:





•
unexpected changes in business and economic conditions;


•
significant increases or decreases in gold prices;


•
unanticipated grade changes;


•
metallurgy, processing, access, availability of materials, equipment, supplies and water;


•
results of current and future exploration activities;


•
results of pending and future feasibility studies;


•
joint venture relationships;


•
local and community impacts and issues;


•
timing of receipt of government approvals;


•
accidents and labor disputes;


•
environmental costs and risks;


•
competitive factors, including competition for property acquisitions; and


•
availability of external financing at reasonable rates or at all.





This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled “Risk Factors and Uncertainties”, “Description of the Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” in our 2010 Form 10-K.  Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law.





Stockholders and other users of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are urged to carefully consider these factors in connection with the forward-looking statements. We do not intend to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.





20





Overview and Results of Operations





Our objective is to increase the value of our shares through the exploration, development and extraction of gold, silver and other valuable minerals. We generally conduct our business as sole operator, but we may enter into arrangements with other companies through joint venture or similar agreements in an effort to achieve our strategic objectives. We own or lease our mineral interests and properties and operate our business through various subsidiary companies, each of which is owned entirely, directly or indirectly, by us.





We own a leasehold interest in a property near Philipsburg, Montana  which is of 217 acres of patented land and approximately 900 acres of Bureau of Land Management  (BLM) land, referred to as Basin Gulch. We acquired the property in 2010 and commenced a regional exploration program in 2010. Over the next two years, we estimate we will spend approximately $4 million on exploration and development at the Basin Gulch Project, which will mainly consist of drilling and test mining.





The Jungo gold exploration project is located approximately 50 miles northwest of the town of Winnemucca in Humboldt County, Nevada. The property is situated on the eastern margin of the Jackson Mountains.





The property is on BLM land and is held by 95 unpatented lode mining claims.  Twenty five of the claims have a two percent net smelter return royalty to William (Bill) Hansen.  The other 70 claims are owned by DGRI.





The property was acquired by DGRI by the transaction with Aultra Gold in January 2010.  Mr. Hansen originally showed the property to Aultra Gold, which acquired it and staked additional claims.





Principal Executive Offices





Our principal executive office is located at 3500 Lenox Road, Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia 30326.  Our phone number is 404-419-2440. Our website is www.DutchGold.com. We currently lease office space for our corporate office and operations under a one-year renewable contract with monthly rental charges approximately $2,500 per month. We believe that these offices adequately meet the current needs of the Company. We make available  periodic reports and press releases on our website. Our common shares trade on the Over the Counter market under the symbol "DGRI."





General Government Regulations





United States





Mining in the State of Nevada and in the State of Montana is subject to Federal, state and local law. Three types of laws are of particular importance to our U.S. mineral properties: those affecting land ownership and mining rights; those regulating mining operations; and those dealing with the environment.





Land Ownership and Mining Rights





The Jungo Project in Nevada  is situated on lands owned by the United States (Federal Lands). On Federal Lands, mining rights are governed by the General Mining Law of 1872 (General Mining Law) as amended, 30 U.S.C. §§ 21-161 (various sections), which allows the location of mining claims on certain Federal Lands upon the discovery of a valuable mineral deposit and proper compliance with claim location requirements. A valid mining claim provides the holder with the right to conduct mining operations for the removal of locatable minerals, subject to compliance with the General Mining Law and Nevada state law governing the staking and registration of mining claims, as well as compliance with various federal, state and local operating and environmental laws, regulations and ordinances. As the owner or lessee of the unpatented mining claims, we have the right to conduct mining operations on the lands subject to the prior procurement of required operating permits and approvals, compliance with the terms and conditions of any applicable mining lease, and compliance with applicable Federal, state, and local laws, regulations and ordinances.





Mining Operations





The exploration of mining properties and operation of mines is governed by both federal and state laws. The Jungo property is administered by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, which we refer to as the "BLM." In general, the Federal laws that govern mining claim location and maintenance and mining operations on Federal Lands, including the Tonkin Springs property, are administered by the BLM. Additional Federal laws, such as those governing the purchase, transport or storage of explosives and those governing mine safety and health, also apply.





21





The State of Nevada, likewise, requires various permits and approvals before mining operations can begin, although the state and Federal regulatory agencies usually cooperate to minimize duplication of permitting efforts. Among other things, a detailed reclamation plan must be prepared and approved, with bonding in the amount of projected reclamation costs.





Mining Operations (continued)





The bond is used to ensure that proper reclamation takes place, and the bond will not be released until this is completed. The Nevada Department of  Environmental Protection, which we refer to as the NDEP, is the state agency that administers the reclamation permits, mine permits and related closure plans on our Nevada property. Local jurisdictions (such as Humboldt County) may also impose permitting requirements (such as conditional use permits or zoning approvals).





Environmental Law





The exploration, operation, closure and reclamation of mining projects in the United States requires numerous notifications, permits, authorizations and public agency decisions. Compliance with environmental and related laws and regulations requires us to obtain permits issued by regulatory agencies, and to file various reports and keep records of our operations. Certain of these permits require periodic renewal or review of their conditions and may be subject to a public review process during which opposition to our proposed operations may be encountered. We are currently operating under various permits for activities connected to mineral exploration, reclamation and environmental considerations. Unless and until a mineral resource is proved, it is unlikely our operations will move beyond the exploration stage. If in the future we decide to proceed beyond exploration, there will be numerous notifications, permit applications and other decisions to be addressed at that time.





The State of Montana likewise requires various permits and approvals before mining operations can begin, although the state and Federal regulatory agencies usually cooperate to minimize duplication of permitting efforts. Among other things, a detailed reclamation plan must be prepared and approved, with bonding in the amount of projected reclamation costs. The bond is used to ensure that proper reclamation takes place, and the bond will not be released until this is completed. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality, which we refer to as the MDEQ, is the state agency that administers the reclamation permits, mine permits and related closure plans on our Montana property. Local jurisdictions (such as Humboldt County) may also impose permitting requirements (such as conditional use permits or zoning approvals).





Gold Uses





Gold is generally used for fabrication or investment. Fabricated gold has a variety of end uses including jewelry, electronics, dentistry, industrial and decorative uses, medals, medallions and official coins. Gold investors buy gold bullion, official coins and jewelry.





Gold Supply





A combination of current mine production and draw-down of existing gold stocks held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals make up the annual gold supply. Based on public information available for the years 2008 through 2010, on average, current mine production has accounted for approximately 61% of the annual gold supply.





On August 8, 2011, the afternoon fixing gold price on the London Bullion Market was $1,693 per ounce and the spot market gold price on the New York Commodity Exchange was $1,713 per ounce.





Gold Price History





The price of gold is volatile and is affected by numerous factors all of which are beyond our control such as the sale or purchase of gold by various central banks and financial institutions, inflation, recession, fluctuation in the relative values of the US dollar and foreign currencies, changes in global and regional gold demand, and the political and economic conditions of major gold-producing countries throughout the world.





The following table presents the high, low and average afternoon fixed prices in U.S. dollars for gold per ounce on the London Bullion Market over the past nine years:





Year

High


Low


Average2002


349



278



3102003


416



320



3632004


454



375



4102005


537



411



4452006


725



525



6032007


841



608



6952008


1,011



713



8722009


1,146



810



9782010


1,421



1,058



1,225





22




Competition





We compete with major mining companies and other mining companies in the acquisition, exploration, financing and development of new projects.   Many of these companies have more established human and materials resources, and are better capitalized than the Company.  There is significant competition for the limited number of gold acquisition and exploration opportunities. Our competitive position depends upon our ability to successfully and economically explore, acquire and develop new and existing mineral prospects. Factors that allow producers to remain competitive over the long-term include the quality and size of ore bodies, costs of operation, and the acquisition and retention of qualified employees. The Company competes with mining companies for skilled mining engineers, mine and processing plant operators and mechanics, geologists, geophysicists and other technical personnel. This competition could result in higher employee turnover and may result in higher labor costs.





Seasonality





Seasonality is not a material factor to the Company for its projects.  Certain surface exploration work may need to be conducted when there is no snow but it is not a significant issue for the Company.





Employees





As of June 30, 2011, we had 5 employees. Our employees in the U.S. include geologists, environmentalists, information technologists and office administrators. The Company believes we have good relations with our employees. We also engage independent contractors in connection with the exploration of our properties, such as drillers, geophysicists, geologists and other technical disciplines.





Results of Operations





During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred operating expenses of $835,918 and $1,619,641 respectively, as compared to $835,856 and $2,255,498 for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2010, respectively.





Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $454,431 and $526,282 for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase results primarily from the following: $52,017 in stock-based compensation expense related to 2011 options granted in Q2 2011 with no comparable grant in 2010; $61,000 in general and administrative expense recorded in 2011 pertaining to Series B Convertible Preferred stock issued in Q2 2011 with no comparable issuance in 2011; a $200,000 reversal of a reserve related to a contingent liability in Q2 2010 which reduced selling, general and administrative expense for the Q2 2010 quarter as management determined that payment of the liability no longer was probable during the quarter with there being no similar adjustment recorded in the current year comparable periods and an increase in other general and administrative related expenditures including but not limited to expenditures incurred related to current exploration activities.





The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by a reduction in professional fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of $454,300 and $1,166,158 respectively. A large portion of the 2010 professional fees were related to stock issued to financial consultants in connection with assisting the Company in raising funds and pursuing possible acquisitions. In 2011, as the Company still incurred related expenditures, management was able to rely less on outside consultants and raise additional funds internally through previously established relationships.





The Company reported interest expense of $596,130 and $1,015,765 for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011. No interest expense was reported for the comparable prior year periods. As a result of the fiscal 2010 audit, management determined that interest expense of $72,942 should have been recorded for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The interest error related to the 2010 quarterly periods was corrected and properly stated in the Company’s fiscal 2010 audited financial statements. However, the Company has not restated its 2010 quarterly results to correct the interest expense error on the respective quarters as management has determined that the uncorrected error on the 2010 quarterly periods is not material to the quarterly financial statement results when analyzing the error on both a qualitative and quantitative basis. An increase in interest expense for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011 results from interest recorded on  a large number of convertible notes that were issued in late 2010 and during the three and six month period ended June 30, 2011. The accretion of the related debt discount and amortization of the related deferred financing costs incurred in obtaining these convertible notes has resulted in an increase in interest expense reported in 2011. In addition, $277,550 in interest expense was recorded for the three and six month period June 30, 2011 related to forbearance agreements executed with two noteholders.





The net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1,415,894 and $2,604,750 respectively, as compared to $815,859 and $1,803,297for three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively. Net loss increased for these periods resulting from an increase in selling, general and administrative expenditures along with an increase in interest expense incurred resulting from the convertible notes issuances as discussed above.





23





Twelve-Month Business Outlook





In order to act upon our operating plan discussed herein, we must be able to raise sufficient funds from (i) debt financing; or, (ii) new investments from private investors.





Operating Expenses and Capital Expenditures





Operating Expenses





Assuming that the Company is successful raising funds, we anticipate incurring operating expenses of approximately $3.2 million  during the next twelve months to fund the costs relating to the development of our properties and the identification of new acquisitions.





Source of Revenue





When produced, the Company expects to sell gold concentrates and ore to brokers and/or refineries. The Company has not produced any revenue since 2008. The Company cannot predict with certainty, when, if ever, revenues will be produced.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





We currently have limited sources of capital, including the public and private placement of equity securities and the possibility of debt. With limited liquid assets and depreciating fixed assets, the availability of funds from traditional sources of debt will be limited and we cannot assure that there will be a source of funds in the future. The Company will take sufficient action to raise additional debt and or equity as the markets will allow.




As of June 30, 2011, we had a cash balance of $21,425. We estimate that, based upon our current business, we will require up to $5 million over the next two years.  However, the Company cannot properly anticipate the capital expenditures and working capital needed in connection with its operations and development.  As part of the Shamika transaction, Dutch Gold holds 4,073,836 shares of Shamika 2 Gold, Inc.’s (ticker:  SHMX) common stock, which as of June 30, 2011, approximates a total market value of $366,645. Although not certain or guaranteed, the Company believes it has access to sufficient funding for the next twelve months.





Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





In the second quarter of 2011, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Plan of Operation and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.





ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





Not required for smaller reporting companies.





ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures




Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.




24




As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s chief executive and chief financial officer has determined that there are material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures.  It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.




The material weaknesses in our disclosure control procedures are as follows:




1.           Lack of formal policies and procedures necessary to adequately review significant accounting transactions. The Company utilizes a third party independent contractor for the preparation of its financial statements. Although the financial statements and footnotes are reviewed by our management, we do not have a formal policy to review significant accounting transactions and the accounting treatment of such transactions. The third party independent contractor is not involved in the day to day operations of the Company and may not be provided information from management on a timely basis to allow for adequate reporting/consideration of certain transactions.




2.           Audit Committee and Financial Expert. The Company does not have a formal audit committee with a financial expert, and thus the Company lacks the board oversight role within the financial reporting process.




We intend to initiate measures to remediate the identified material weaknesses including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:




1.Establishing a formal review process of significant accounting transactions including the appropriate segregation of duties that includes participation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s corporate legal counsel; and




2.Form an Audit Committee that will establish policies and procedures that will provide the Board of Directors a formal review process that will, among other things, assure that management controls and procedures are in place and being maintained consistently.




(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting




As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, management is aware that there a significant deficiency and a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and therefore has concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2010. The significant deficiency relates to a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees involvement with general administrative and financial matters.  The material weakness relates to a lack of formal policies and procedures necessary to adequately review significant accounting transactions.




There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.




25




PART II — OTHER INFORMATION





Item 1.    Legal Proceedings





From time to time, we are involved in claims and suits that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Although management currently believes that resolving any such claims against us will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position or results of operations, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. In addition to any such claims and suits, we are involved in the following legal proceedings.





On April 8, 2010, the Company was advised that the Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation in the Company in the matter identified as Dutch Gold Resources, Inc, Case No. A-03222.  In accordance with the investigation, the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Daniel W. Hollis, received subpoenas to produce documents and testify before the Commission.  Neither the Company nor Mr. Hollis have been notified of the nature of the investigation.  The Company has fully cooperated with the investigation supplying both documentation and testimony in response to the request for information.





We are not aware of any other pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.





Item 1A.   Risk Factors





Not required for smaller reporting companies.





Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.





On April 14, 2011, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $55,000 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.  Principal and interest on the note are due on April 12, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the rate of $0.0075 per share.





On May 24, 2011, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $52,500 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.  Principal and interest on the note are due on February 27, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the rate equal to fifty-five percent (55%) of the of the average of the lowest three trading prices for the ten trading days preceding a conversion notice by the lender.





On June 7, 2011, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $100,000 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.  Principal and interest on the note are due on September 3, 2011 and is convertible into 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.  In connection with the subscription for the note, the Company issued a warrant to the subscriber to purchase 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock at the exercise prices of $0.02 per share.





The Company believes that all of the above transactions were transactions not involving any public offering within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, since (a) each of the transactions involved the offering of such securities to a substantially limited number of persons; (b) each person took the securities as an investment for his/her/its own account and not with a view to distribution; (c) each person had access to information equivalent to that which would be included in a registration statement on the applicable form under the Securities Act; and (d) each person had knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to understand the merits and risk of the investment; therefore no registration statement needed to be in effect prior to such issuances.





Use of proceeds





The proceeds from these financings were used for general corporate purposes including working capital, and in the exploration and the development of the Company’s projects.





Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities





None.





Item 4.    (Removed and Reserved)








Item 5.    Other Information





None.





26





Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K





Exhibits .





Exhibit

Description of Exhibit31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a(14a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a(14a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Reports on Form 8-K . During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K:





The Company filed a Form 8-K on May 4, 2011 to disclose the resignation of Steven Keaveney as Chief Financial Officer and appoint Tom Leahey as his   replacement.





SIGNATURES





In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





DUTCH GOLD RESOURCES, INC.By:
/s/Daniel W. HollisDaniel W. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer, Director(principal executive officer)By:
/s/ Tom LeaheyTom Leahey , Chief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)By:
/s/ Lance RosemarinLance Rosemarin, Director





Date:  October 25, 2011





27