alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 92205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27238]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 735 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-421, K2025-419.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-27238 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 21

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiaries of the Company and the jurisdiction in which each company was
incorporated are listed below. Unless otherwise indicated parenthetically, 100% of the voting securities of each subsidiary are owned by the Company. All companies indicated with an asterisk (*) are subsidiaries of AMVAC. All of the following
subsidiaries are included in the Companys consolidated financial statements:



|                                                        |  |                
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|AMVAC Chemical Corporation                              |  | California     
|GemChem, Inc.                                           |  | California     
|2110 Davie Corporation (formerly ABSCO Distributing)    |  | California     
|AMVAC Chemical UK Ltd.*                                 |  | Surrey, England
|AMVAC Chemical GmbH                                     |  | Switzerland    
|AMVAC do Brasil Representácoes Ltda                     |  | Brasil         
|Agroservicios Amvac, SA de CV                           |  | Mexico         
|Quimica Amvac de Mexico SA de CV                        |  | Mexico         
|AMVAC de Costa Rica Sociedad Anonima                    |  | Costa Rica     
|Environmental Mediation, Inc.                           |  | California     
|Calhart Corporation                                     |  | California     
|Manufacturers Mirror & Glass Co., Inc.                  |  | California     
|Todagco (80%)*                                          |  | California     
|American Vanguard Corporation of Imperial Valley (90%)* |  | California     
|AMVAC Ag-Chem*                                          |  | California     
|AMVAC Chemical Corporation-Nevada*                      |  | Nevada
** **

**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-12892)of Mission Community Bancorp of our report of independent registered publicaccounting firm dated March 27, 2008, on our audit of the consolidatedbalance sheets of Mission Community Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31,2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes inshareholder’s equity and cash flows for the years then ended, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB.

 
| /s/ Vavrinek, Trine,  Day & Co., LLP |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Laguna Hills,  California                     |
| March 28, 2008                           |

 

----
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

SEAN PARNELL. GOVERNOR 

3132 CHANNEL DRIVE 

PO Box 112500 

JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-2500 

FAX: 

PHONE: 

(907) 586-8365 

(907) 465-3900 

November 16, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-1995-492 

~ J 

V 

'•>? 

en 

o 

• •-• '--• - O 

- ^'" .7* ->• 

^3S 

nn^ m 

ooo 

oo 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of scheduled transportation. The 

communities of McCarthy, Gulkana and May Creek depend on scheduled air freight, passenger 

and mail service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

to comment on. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at McCarthy, Gulkana, and 

May Creek. 

Marc Limfen 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

Cc: Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, DOT&PF 

"ProviJini: for the Siife movi'inent of penple iinJ ^ooJs and tht' Jelivery oj sinic vi/n/'i f.v. '
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1030 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a study on cyber 

attack standards of measurement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to conduct 

a study on cyber attack standards of measurement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cyber Attack Stand5 ards of Measurement Study’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CYBER ATTACK STANDARDS OF MEASUREMENT 

7 STUDY. 

8 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Director of National In9 telligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland 

10 Security, the Director of the Federal Bureau of InvestigaVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:13 Feb 18, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1030.IH H1030

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1030 IH

1 tion, and the Secretary of Defense, shall carry out a study 

2 to determine appropriate standards that— 

3 (1) can be used to measure the damage of cyber 

4 incidents for the purposes of determining the re5 sponse to such incidents; and 

6 (2) include a method for quantifying the dam7 age caused to affected computers, systems, and de8 vices. 

9 (b) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.— 

10 (1) PRELIMINARY FINDINGS.—Not later than 

11 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

12 the Director of National Intelligence shall provide to 

13 the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

14 on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 

15 and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Sen16 ate and the Committee on Armed Services, the Com17 mittee on Homeland Security, and the Permanent 

18 Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

19 Representatives the initial findings of the study re20 quired under subsection (a). 

21 (2) REPORT.—Not later than 360 days after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director 

23 of National Intelligence shall submit to the Com24 mittee on Armed Services, the Committee on Home25 land Security and Governmental Affairs, and the SeVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:13 Feb 18, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1030.IH H1030

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1030 IH

1 lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the 

2 Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

3 Homeland Security, and the Permanent Select Com4 mittee on Intelligence of the House of Representa5 tives a report containing the complete findings of 

6 such study. 

7 (3) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by 

8 paragraph (2) shall be submitted in unclassified 

9 form, but may contain a classified annex. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 189 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[House]
[Page S10977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 154

WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2008

No. 189
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

             SECTION 906 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and in connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Doane Pet Care Company for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of Doane Pet Care Company hereby certifies that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Doane
        Pet Care Company.


Date: May 8, 2003


                                             /s/ PHILIP K. WOODLIEF
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Philip K. Woodlief
                                             Vice-President, Finance and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             Doane Pet Care Company




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Doane Pet Care Company and will be retained by Doane Pet Care
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE ADOPTION OF: A.L.E. AND K.J.E., MINORS

PETITION OF: V.C., NATURAL MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 239 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### In the Matter of American Home Assurance Company, Appellant, v Tammi Malborough et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 541]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, *710Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated June 2,1994, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated October 25, 1994, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination *(see,*CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 2, 1994, is dismissed since that order was superseded by the order dated October 25, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 25, 1994, is affirmed insofar as reviewed for reasons stated by Justice Lockman at the Supreme Court in the orders dated June 2, 1994, and October 25, 1994; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent General Accident Insurance Company of New York is awarded one bill of costs. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 3 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H75]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 RECESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Holden). Pursuant to clause 12(a) of 
rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess until approximately 
12:55 p.m. today.
  Accordingly (at 10 o'clock and 20 minutes a.m.), the House stood in 
recess until approximately 12:55 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 59

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
     Protection Agency relating to ``Accidental Release Prevention 
   Requirements: Risk Management Programs under the Clean Air Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

   Mr. Mullin (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. 
   Blackburn, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Collins of 
 Georgia, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida, Mr. 
  Newhouse, Mr. Perry, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Tipton, and Mr. 
Aderholt) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental 
     Protection Agency relating to ``Accidental Release Prevention 
   Requirements: Risk Management Programs under the Clean Air Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 
under the Clean Air Act'' (published at 82 Fed. Reg. 4594 (January 13, 
2017)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frank Simons, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

There was not such an abuse of the discretion of the judge who tried the ease, in refusing the motion for a new trial, as calls for the interference of this court.

New trial. ^ Criminal law. Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1873.

This case turns purely upon the weight attached by the jury to the evidence introduced. To set forth the testimony would illustrate no principle of law.

Thrasher *&*Thrasher; Howell C. GlbnN, forplaintiff in error.

*588John T. Glenn, solicitor general, for the state.

Tripue, Judge.

This is another one of those cases which rests upon the question whether the judge who presided at the trial abused that discretion with which he is by law invested, in granting or refusing motions for new trial, founded upon the ground that the verdict is against the evidence, etc. In such cases, where no argument could illustrate any principle of law, and the court below has not abused his discretion, it is sufficient to say that the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Desert Mining, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Peter K. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Peter K. Nelson

Peter K. Nelson

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 30, 2005
CERTIFICATION

I, David Bloom, Chief Executive Officer of Chelsea
Property Group, Inc., the sole general partner of CPG Partners, L.P., (the
"OP"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby
certify as follows:

|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the OP for the period ended September 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the OP.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 12th
day of November 2004.

| | /s/ David Bloom
David Bloom
Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to, CPG Partners, L.P., and will be retained by CPG
Partners, L.P., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 4 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E54]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  ON THE OCCASION OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF SENATOR ROBERT C. BYRD'S 
                       SERVICE IN THE U.S. SENATE

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. NICK J. RAHALL II

                            of west virginia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Friday, January 9, 2009

  Mr. RAHALL. Madam Speaker, this week, in this Capitol, we are 
witnessing a convergence of a number of events that will long stand out 
in our Nation's collective memories. We are on the front edge of a new 
session of Congress, preparing for a landmark moment in the history of 
America's presidency. And, at the same time, we are celebrating a major 
milestone for one of this Nation's most devoted and accomplished public 
servants--U.S. Senator Robert C. Byrd.
  It was 50 years ago, that Senator Byrd, for the first time, took the 
oath of office to serve in the United States Senate--an oath he has now 
taken a record-setting nine times.
  Yesterday, as numerous Members of the House and Senate raised their 
own hands and took their own very first oaths, I could not help but 
think about what it must have been like for our Senior Senator from 
West Virginia to watch these new ranks at the start of their own 
Congressional careers.
  I was reminded of my first day of service in this body. I recall 
being humbled by the responsibility that had been placed in my hands 
and awed by the auspicious ceremony and the grandeur of this ornate 
Chamber.
  On that first day, I was relieved at the knowledge that I was blessed 
with the wisdom, the support, and the mentorship of Robert C. Byrd. 
Throughout my career here, he has been a constant source of 
encouragement and sage advice.
  Today, as we embark upon this new session cognizant of the tremendous 
challenges before us--a struggling economy, two wars, a strapped 
Federal budget, and growing public need--we can breathe easier knowing 
that we are all blessed to have the continuing service of Robert C. 
Byrd to steer us through the rocky shoals.
  Congratulations to Senator Byrd--our trailblazer, our Leader, our Big 
Daddy. May he continue to serve the people of West Virginia and the 
entire Nation for many years to come.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dinesh R. Desai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emtec, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
  the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
  and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
  end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of
  an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
  registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| |  |                                           
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Dinesh R. Desai                       
| |  |                                           
| |  | Dinesh R. Desai                           
| |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer         
| |  | and President(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:
  November 30, 2006



---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 17, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-968 Lower Tribunal No. F07-33060

________________ 

### John A. Andrews , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge. John A. Andrews, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Commission Monthly Case Activity for November 2012

1.Cases Pending Beginning of Month 312.Cases Added to Docket 


0
3.Cases Subtracted From Docket

Q3 Contracting, Inc.
No. 11-1788
Final Order on 11/2/12

-14.Total Cases Pending End of Month30