alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1109 

To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. MCNERNEY, 

and Mr. MULLIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF FACILITY MERGER AU4 THORIZATION. 

5 Section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 824b(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘such facili7 ties or any part thereof’’ and inserting ‘‘such facilities, or 

8 any part thereof, of a value in excess of $10,000,000’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1109 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION FOR CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS. 

2 Section 203(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

3 824b(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

4 new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(7)(A) Not later than 180 days after the date 

6 of enactment of this paragraph, the Commission 

7 shall promulgate a rule requiring any public utility 

8 that is seeking to merge or consolidate, directly or 

9 indirectly, its facilities subject to the jurisdiction of 

10 the Commission, or any part thereof, with those of 

11 any other person, to notify the Commission of such 

12 transaction not later than 30 days after the date on 

13 which the transaction is consummated if— 

14 ‘‘(i) such facilities, or any part thereof, are 

15 of a value in excess of $1,000,000; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) such public utility is not required to 

17 secure an order of the Commission under para18 graph (1)(B). 

19 ‘‘(B) In establishing any notification require20 ment under subparagraph (A), the Commission 

21 shall, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize 

22 the paperwork burden resulting from the collection 

23 of information.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1109 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 

3 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Nesky, Anthony

From: Dawn Kolkman <dkolkman@uranerz.com>

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 4:21 PM

To: Nesky, Anthony

Subject: RE: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Thank You!

Dawn Kolkman 

Permitting Manager

Uranerz Energy Corporation

1701 East “E” Street

PO Box 50850

Casper, WY 82605‐0850 USA

T: 307‐289‐8900 | F: 307‐265‐8904 | E: dkolkman@uranerz.com

This electronic coummunication, and any attachments, may contain information which is confidential and/or privileged.  If you are not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying or reliance upon the contents of this coummunication is strictly prohibited.  If you

have received this coummunication in error, please notify the sender immediately and kindly delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.

From: Nesky, Anthony [mailto:Nesky.Tony@epa.gov]  

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:14 PM

To: Dawn Kolkman

Cc: Rosencrantz, Ingrid

Subject: RE: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Dear Ms. Kolkman:

Thank you for your interest in hearings about the proposed rulemaking for 40 CFR 192 .  I wanted to acknowledge your

request for an extension of the comment period.  You do not need to take any further action:  I have forwarded your

request for an extension to management, and it is under consideration.  

Tony Nesky 

Center for Radiation Information and Outreach 

Tel: 202-343-9597 

nesky.tony@epa.gov

From: Dawn Kolkman [mailto:dkolkman@uranerz.com]  

Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:27 PM

To: Nesky, Anthony

Subject: Public Hearing for proposed rule making 40 CFR Part 192

Tony,

Thank you for returning my call earlier today regarding my request for public hearing.  I understood from your message

that it looks like there may be a March 10th hearing.  I look forward to receiving the registration information for that

date.
2

Also,  I would like to formally request an extension, if possible, for the review of the proposal – can that occur and how

do I officially go about it?

Thank you again for all your assistance.

Regards,

Dawn Kolkman 

Permitting Manager

Uranerz Energy Corporation

1701 East “E” Street

PO Box 50850

Casper, WY 82605‐0850 USA

T: 307‐289‐8900 | F: 307‐265‐8904 | E: dkolkman@uranerz.com

This electronic coummunication, and any attachments, may contain information which is confidential and/or privileged.  If you are not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution, copying or reliance upon the contents of this coummunication is strictly prohibited.  If you

have received this coummunication in error, please notify the sender immediately and kindly delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40141

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

YESENIA LEAL

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:99-CR-372-7

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Yesenia Leal, federal prisoner # 92524-079, appeals the district court’s

denial of her motion to compel the Government to file a motion for reduction of

sentence pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(b).

Rule 35(b) does not provide a jurisdictional basis upon which to entertain

Leal’s motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994).

The Government’s refusal to file a Rule 35 motion is reviewable only if it is based

on an unconstitutional motive, which Leal does not allege. See United States v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 5, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40141

2

Sneed, 63 F.3d 381, 389 n. 6 (5th Cir.1995). Leal’s motion is thus unauthorized

and the district court and this court both lack jurisdiction to consider it.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Exhibit 24.2**POWER OF ATTORNEY**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS     WHEREAS, ALCAN INC., a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), proposes shortly to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended(the “Act”), the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.     WHEREAS, the undersigned is an Officer and/or a Director of the Company as indicated below;     NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints R. Millington, D. McAuslandand P. Chenard and each of them, as attorneys for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name,place and stead, and in each of the undersigned’s offices and capacities as an Officer and/or aDirector of the Company, to execute and file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, hereby giving andgranting to said attorneys full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thingwhatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully, to all intentsand purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof,hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to bedone, by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of February 2007.         Signed: /s/ L. Denis Desautels   Name:  L. Denis Desautels   Title:  Director
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 9 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S590]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  Mr. REID. I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to a period 
of morning business, with Senators allowed to speak therein for up to 
10 minutes each.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert B. Barnhill,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended July 1, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| Date:   August 15, 2007 |   | /s/ Robert B. Barnhill, Jr. |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                              |   | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.     |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in thisperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
|   | August 7, 2008 | /s/ Stephanie G. DiMarco                                                    |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                | Stephanie G. DiMarco                                                        |
|   |                | Principal Executive Officer and President, and  Principal Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by AdventSoftware, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ISSUER'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001002132
<NAME>                        AlphaNet Solutions, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U. S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,350
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                   549
<INVENTORY>                                    7,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,170
<PP&E>                                         8,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29,361
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       63
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,877
<SALES>                                        104,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,803
<CGS>                                          92,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,557
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Commission Monthly Case Activity for February 2022

1. Cases Pending Beginning of Month 18

2. Cases Added to Docket 1 

Anthony Marano Co.

19-0622

Directed for Review on February 10, 2022 

3. Cases Subtracted from Docket 0 

4. Total Cases Pending End of Month 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928420
<NAME> COHESANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         170,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,214,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,344
<INVENTORY>                                  3,171,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,820,982
<PP&E>                                       1,156,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 526,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,787,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,446,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,688,343
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,450,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,787,468
<SALES>                                      3,053,923
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,053,923
<CGS>                                        1,683,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,902,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (33,509)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                39,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                250,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,641
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

J. R. WILKERSON, AKA Adonai El

Shaddai, AKA James Wilkerson

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

M. D. STAINER, Secretary, CDCR, Individual Capacity; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 55287

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 09313

- RGK

- JC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER , Circuit Judges.

J.R. Wilkerson

, aka Adonai El

- Shaddai

, aka James Wilkerson (“El

Shaddai”) ap peals pro se from the district court’ s judgment dismissing his action

brought under 4 2 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use a nd Inst itutionalized

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 55287

Persons Act

, alleging constitutional and statutory violations related to the exercise

of his religion

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, El

- Shaddai failed to challenge the district court’s

screening order dismissing his second amended complaint for failure to state a

claim , and therefore El

- Shaddai has waived any such challenge. See Smith v.

Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in

its opening brief are deemed waived.”) ; G reenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th

Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare

assert ion does not preserve a claim . . . . ”)

.

In light of our disposition, a ppellees ’ motion s to revoke El

- Shaddai’s in

forma pauperis status (Docket Entry No. 5) and to take judicial notice (Docket

Entry No. 6) are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          86,304
<SECURITIES>                                    61,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                       269
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,143
<PP&E>                                           3,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       185,845
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,230
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,267
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                       341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (228)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Community Bankshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) for  the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                    



Date: August 13, 2003

| | /s/ Harry L. Stephens
          Harry L. Stephens
          Executive Vice-President and
          Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. The State, Respondent.

*February 10, 1928.*

The following order was filed February 10, 1928:

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to *Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. State, ante,*p. 190, and the statement of facts being substantially the same, it is unnecessary to set them forth at length.

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court having been received by the clerk of this court and filed,—

It is now here ordered and adjudged that, pursuant to the command thereof, the judgment entered in this court in said action on the 9th day of February, 1926, affirming the judgment of the circuit court for Dane county herein, be and the same is in all things vacated and set aside; and

It is further ordered and adjudged that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the circuit court for Dane county, Wisconsin, with direction to said court to reverse its judgment in this action dismissing the complaint upon the merits; and said court is further directed to reverse its order entered May 28, 1925, and enter an order overruling the demurrer of the defendant and for further proceedings according to law.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

p0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137737

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137737 COA: 285185 Bay CC: 03-010439-FH RICHARD WAYNE ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).