alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1234 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1234

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain contract 
               research eligible for the research credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2017

 Mr. Meehan (for himself, Mr. Holding, and Mr. Butterfield) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain contract 
               research eligible for the research credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Domestic Research Enhancement Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH CREDIT EXPANDED TO MAKE CERTAIN RESEARCH ELIGIBLE FOR 
              THE CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Section 41(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
        is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A), 
        by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting ``, and'', and by adding at the end the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(C) contracted research expenses.''.
            (2) Section 41(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the 
        end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Contracted research expenses.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `contracted research 
                expenses' means 35 percent of the in-house research 
                expenses for the taxable year paid or incurred by the 
                taxpayer contracted to do research, but only when the 
                contracting taxpayer pays or incurs contract research 
                expenses for such taxable year.
                    ``(B) Funded research allowed.--For purposes of 
                this section, the prohibition contained in subsection 
                (d)(4)(H) shall not apply.
                    ``(C) Denial of double benefit.--The amount of any 
                in-house research expenses taken into account under 
                this section (without regard to this paragraph) by a 
                contracted taxpayer for a taxable year shall be reduced 
                by the amount of in-house research expenses taken into 
                account by such taxpayer under subparagraph (A) for 
                taxable year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedcertifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Advent Software, Inc.

 

 
| August 6,  2010 | /s/  James S. Cox        |
|----------------------|--------------------------|
|                 | James  S. Cox            |
|                 | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Advent Software, Inc. and will be retained by Advent Software, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 6 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Page S313]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mrs. BOXER:
  S. 207. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 
deduction for health insurance premiums; to the Committee on Finance.
  Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, today I am introducing the Health 
Insurance Tax Relief Act to help our Nation's workers and working 
families deal with dramatic increases in health care costs. The 
legislation would allow taxpayers to deduct their health insurance 
premiums up to $2,000 for individuals and $4,000 for families.
  While this deduction will certainly not solve all of the problems in 
our health care system, it will provide help for working individuals 
and families who have seen health care premium costs drastically rise. 
Since 1999, the average health insurance premium for workers covering 
their families has more than doubled. A recent survey by the Kaiser 
Family Foundation found that 40 percent of employers that offer health 
benefits are likely to increase the amount their employees pay in 
premiums.
  This is an issue of fairness. Current law provides a patchwork of tax 
deductions for health care costs depending upon an individual's 
employer, the type of health care plan provided by their employer, and/
or percentage of income spent on health care, among other things.
  Unfortunately this patchwork has left out many employees who face 
increasing premiums or are buying high cost health plans on their own. 
This legislation rectifies that unfairness and will help people meet 
rising health care costs. It would help those currently purchasing 
coverage to continue to do so, as well as helping people who are 
uninsured to purchase coverage.
  This legislation is particularly important for employees in small 
businesses. Many small businesses across the country have been forced 
by the rising cost of health care to shift an increasing amount of 
health insurance costs to their employees. These are hard working 
Americans struggling to make ends meet in a weak economy.
  Now more than ever we need legislation that provides targeted 
assistance to help families pay for health care. I urge my colleagues 
to support my legislation.
                                 ______
```
EXHIBIT 23



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement
Nos. 2-80776, 33-2139,  33-7901,  33-15062,  33-43635,  33-62799 and 33-59803 on
Form S-8 and  Registration  Statement No.  333-70967 on Form S-3 of Albertson's,
Inc.  and  subsidiaries  of our report  dated March 17,  1999,  incorporated  by
reference  in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  Albertson's,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries for the year ended January 28, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boise, Idaho
April 8, 1999




                                     Page 1
EXHIBIT 32.2
                             ------------

                            CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the
"Report") of AMCON Distributing Company (the "Company") for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2004, I, Michael D. James, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

    (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 19, 2005            /s/ Michael D. James
                                 -------------------------
                                 Title: Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 3, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Paul R. Cook

-----------------------------------
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  September 1, 2006
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

I, Robert B. Barnhill,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

# 1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the period ended September 24, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

# 2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| Date: November 8, 2006 |   |   |   | /s/ Robert B. Barnhill, Jr. |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   |   |   | Robert B. Barnhill, Jr.     |

##  

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
#### The State *v.*Samuel Jackson and Jesse Davis.

1 *I From*Wake. J

A *scire facias*issued to shew cause why a forfeiture should not be made absolute. The Defendants showed cause, and the County Courtremit-ted the forfeiture. The Solicitor for the State appealed to the Superior Court. In that Court, the case must be heard *de novo ;*and tiie Defendants shew cause in the same manner as in the County Court.

The Defendants were under recognizance to appear at Wake County Court, at February Term, 1818 5 they failed to appear, and their recognizances were forfeited. *Scire fadases*were issued, and upon their appearing in Court and *231shewing cause, their forfeitures were remitted. From this judgment of the County Court, the Solicitor for the State appealed to the Superior Court, and the presiding Judge enquired of the Attorney-General what reason he had to offer, why the judgment of the County Court should not be affirmed. The Attorney-General contended, that as this was an appeal, there must be a trial *de novo*in the Superior Court, and that the Defendants should be compelled to shew cause why then1 forfeiture should not be made absolute, in the same manner as if the *scire fadases*had issued from the Superior Court. The Judge was of opinion, that the Attorney-General must shew that the judgment of the County Court was wrong; and that not ■boing shewn, the judgment of the County Court was affirmed, and the Attorney-General appealed to this Court.

Heatsersok, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Upon an appeal from the County to the Superior Court, the law directs that there shall be a trial *de novo ;*that is, it shall be tried in the same manner as it should havebeen tried in the County Court. On the motion to remit the forfeiture in the County Court, the Defendants were bound to shew some reason or cause wherefore it should be remitted. When the case came into the Superior Court, upon an appeal, the Defendants should again, as in the County Court, have shewn the reason wherefore their forfeiture should bo remitted. The opinion, therefore, of the presiding Judge, was erroneous in affirming the judgment of the County Court, merely because the State did not shew it to be wrong. He should have heard the case *de novo.*The judgment of the Superior Court must therefore be reversed, and the case remanded to the Superior Court, with instructions to hear it *de novo.*
```

[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H199]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

  A message from the Senate by Ms. Curtis, one of its clerks, announced 
that the Senate has passed a bill of the following title in which the 
concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 60. An act to prohibit the sale and counterfeiting of 
     Presidential inaugural tickets.

                          ____________________
```
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-7145

DARRELL J. HAMPTON, Claimant-Appellant,

v. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretar y of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

__________ ________________ DECIDED: March 9, 2006

__________________________

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM. Darrell J. Hampton appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of mandamus

as moot. Hampton v. Nicholson , No. 04-2199 (Vet. App. April 19, 2005). Because the United States Court of Appeals for Veter ans Claims granted Hampton’s motion for a panel hearing on his underlying appeal, 03-927, it did not ab use its discretion in dismissing his petition for the writ, which requested extr aordinary procedural action in aid of that appeal. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976) (providing the standard for grant ing a writ of mandamus); Lamb v. Principi , 284 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (finding jurisdiction to revi ew denials of a writ of mandamus by the Veterans Court). Therefore, we affirm

.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY (AFFSA)

4 Apr 10

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/ARM-100

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF (AJW31AF)

6500 South MacArthur Building 4, Room 124 Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4633 (Regulatory Docket FAA-2002-12189)

1. Title 14 CFR Exemption 4633 was granted to the United States Air Force on 6 Jun 86 and was renewed as 4633M on 28 May 10. The exemption expires 30 Sep 12. Exemption 4633M relieves USAF aircraft from the provisions of Section 91.215 (b) and (c).

2. Under this exemption, the USAF conducts m ilitary training flight operations in designated airspace above 10,000 feet MSL with out operating aircraft transponde rs, subject to provisions established by the FAA. The provisions of 4633, as amended in 4633M, will remain a part of this renewal, if approved. The requirement for the USAF to conduct these operations remains unchanged. Extension of the exemption is essential for USAF aircrews to accomplish transponder-off operations and training. These pro cedures are critical to continuation training for wartime scenarios and training operations. The procedures, affected areas, and operations constraints outlined in Exemption 4633 (as amended in 2006) have provided invaluable training to USAF aircrews. We hereby request an exte nsion IAW Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations,

Part 11.

2. As operations under this exemption have been sa fely conducted for the past twenty-six years, the Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption through 30 Sep 15. Please contact me with any questions at (405) 739-9640 or e-mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil

.

ALEX E. KRAUSE, Maj, USAF Chief, Flight Standards Division
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 111 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.111

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Arbitration Agreements'' (82 Fed. Reg. 33210 (July 19, 2017)), and 
such rule shall have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2  
 C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending May 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
 /s/ Paul R. Cook
 Paul R. Cook
 Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
 American Consumers, Inc.
 
 
 Date:  August 28, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1168 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1168

To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 
United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted active 
military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of 
                 Veterans Affairs, and other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2017

  Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Lance, Ms. McCollum, Ms. DeLauro, Mrs. 
Dingell, Mr. Engel, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Ms. Hanabusa, Mr. 
  McGovern, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Keating, and Mr. Polis) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
  Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 
United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted active 
military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of 
                 Veterans Affairs, and other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Cadet Nurse Corps 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. SERVICE DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 401(a)(1)(A) of the GI 
Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (38 U.S.C. 106 note), the Secretary of 
Defense is deemed to have determined that qualified service of a person 
constituted active military service.
    (b) Determination of Discharge Status.--The Secretary of Defense 
shall issue an honorable discharge under section 401(a)(1)(B) of the GI 
Bill Improvement Act of 1977 to each person whose qualified service 
warrants an honorable discharge. Such discharge shall be issued before 
the end of the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE BENEFITS.

    No benefits may be paid to any person as a result of the enactment 
of this Act for any period before the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``qualified service'' means service of a 
person as a member of the organization known as the United States Cadet 
Nurse Corps during the period beginning on July 1, 1943, and ending on 
December 31, 1948.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT NO. 99: CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR"
PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Written or oral statements made by Alcan or its representatives, including
statements set forth in Alcan's Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 1997,
which describe the Company's or management's objectives, projections, estimates,
expectations or predictions of the future may be "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such
as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "estimates," "anticipates" or
the negative thereof or other variations thereon. The Company cautions that, by
their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty and that
the Company's actual results could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a
particular projection is realized.

Important factors which could cause the Company's actual performance to differ
materially from projections or expectations included in forward-looking
statements include global aluminum supply and demand conditions, aluminum ingot
prices and changes in other raw materials costs and availability, cyclical
demand and pricing within the principal markets for the Company's products,
changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting environmental,
health or safety compliance, economic developments and other factors within the
countries in which the Company operates or sells its products and other factors
relating to the Company's ongoing operations including, but not limited to,
litigation, labour negotiations and fiscal regimes.

Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, but are not
necessarily limited to, those discussed under the heading "Risks and
Uncertainties" in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section of Alcan's
Annual Report 1997, incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 7 of, and filed
as an exhibit to, the Company's report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31
December 1997. The text under such heading is incorporated herein by reference.
Copies of the Company's filings may be obtained by contacting the Company or the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission.